WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 16
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME:  FRAMEWORK AND OBJECTIVES
(1) OVERVIEW
1. During its democratic transition, Indonesia has taken important constitutional and
governmental steps aimed at reducing presidential authority and strengthening the role of parliament.
Nonetheless, this transition is incomplete;  political consensus on further changes is still emerging.
The formulation of trade policy has changed little since the previous Trade Policy Review ofIndonesia in 1998, except that it now appears to be rather more ad hoc , especially with regard to
sensitive sectors.
2. Fiscal powers have been rapidly decentralized to provincial and local governments, with
major implications for business and investment that might also have a bearing on trade.  Regional
governments now seem to have greater control over at least non-oil and gas investment approvals andin practice may have greater latitude to implement provincial taxes, levies, and fees;  these might
potentially target business and investors, although the precise details are uncertain and still appear to
be evolving.  Indonesia’s relatively open investment regime has been further liberalized and the
approval processes streamlined.  New investment legislation is to be passed in 2003.  However, the
new, unclear investment rules and procedures, and the extent of regional involvement in investmentapprovals, including in the mining sector where some provinces wish to be directly engaged, add to
investor uncertainty by creating less predictable investment and tax regimes.
3. Indonesia’s main industrial and trade policy objectives are to implement the IMF reforms and
its WTO commitments.  In some cases it has unilaterally liberalized beyond its multilateral
obligations.  Trade liberalization is seen as a core element of poverty alleviation.  A high trade policy
priority is to expand and diversify exports.  Indonesia is committed to and participates actively in the
multilateral system.  It is neither a member nor observer of the plurilateral Agreement on GovernmentProcurement.  Indonesia has been involved in only a few disputes in the WTO since its last Review.
4. Indonesia’s regional trade liberalization is limited to the ASEAN Free-Trade Area (AFTA).
However, through ASEAN, Indonesia is actively pursuing greater regional trade links, including the
establishment of an ASEAN-China Free Trade Area within ten years, and the formation of an East
Asia Free-Trade Area between ASEAN members, China, Japan, and Korea (ASEAN +3).
(2) G
ENERAL CONSTITUTIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
5. Indonesia has made substantial changes as part of its democratic transition since its last Trade
Policy Review in 1998.  Democratic elections were held in June 1999.  Amendments in 1999 to the1945 Constitution limited the President’s tenure to  two five-year terms, and transferred certain
presidential legislative powers, including wide discretionary authority, to Parliament to develop a
more open parliamentary system.  As from 2002-03, the House of People's Representatives (DPR)
may pass legislation;  the approval of the President is no longer necessary.  Indonesia’s democratic
transition is incomplete.  Further governmental and political changes are expected to strengthenParliament's role and authority but are still uncertain as no political consensus has yet emerged.  There
have been four cabinets and two presidents since 1999.
6. Legislative authority is shared between the DPR and the People's Consultative Assembly
(MPR).  Fundamental changes in the composition of the DPR and MPR before the 1999 general
election resulted in broader representation, and reduced the armed forces' powerful influence onIndonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 17
government.1  The mix of the 500 members of the DPR, which are also in the MPR, was changed to
462 elected members (with five-year terms) and 38 presidential appointees from the armed forces and
police (previously 425 and 75, respectively).  The MPR was also reduced from 1,000 members to 700,
and presidential appointments removed.  Non-House members of the Assembly consist of
135 regional representatives (elected by provincial assemblies) and 65 interest group representatives,
selected by the General Election Commission (KPU).2  Military/police representation in the DPR and
MPR is to cease in 2004 and 2009, respectively;  representation of interest groups in the Assembly is
also expected to stop in 2004.  The MPR now convenes annually and plays an active role;  previously,
it met only every five years, normally following DPR elections.
7. Judicial independence was improved by the establishment of the independent National Law
Commission in December 1999, and transfer of the administrative and regulatory functions of courtsfrom the Ministry of Justice (now Justice and Human Rights) to the Supreme Court (Law on the
Judiciary, No. 35/1999).  An Ombudsma n's Office was also created in 2000.
3
(i) Regional decentralization
8. Indonesia quickly decentralized its highly centralized system of government from
January 2001 (Box II.1).  Regional autonomy was enhanced by devolving much greater authority forpublic expenditure and revenue to provincial and local governments (districts), and election of
regional parliaments (assemblies).  Previously, provinces were run by central government ministries;
the President also appointed the provincial governor.  The Regional Autonomy Advisory Council,
established in July 2000, oversees the new arrangements.
4  Overcoming weak regional governance
and administration will be a major challenge.
9. There are some 353 districts and 30 provinces, which are now responsible for key public
services, such as health, education, communications, agriculture, industry, and trade.  Regionalgovernments are to receive increased revenue shares from the central government, including from
mineral and forestry royalties for resource-rich provinces (e.g. Aceh, Irian Jaya, and East
Kalimantan), personal income and other taxes, as well as general purpose grants (general allocation
fund) and earmarked transfers (special allocation fund).  Regional governments were given additional,
albeit low, revenue-raising powers.
5  Many of these taxes, levies and fees have targeted business,
thereby creating private-sector uncertainty, especially in mining, which is vulnerable owing to the
location-specific nature of investment;  some province s also seem keen to engage in mining directly.
Confusion over who was responsible for issuing mining leases, land, and investment approvals
adversely affected the investment climate (section (8)).6  The private sector is also concerned that
                                                     
1 While the House (DPR) is the premier legislative institution and must approve all legislation (it can
initiate its own legislation, but never did so before 1999), the Assembly is the highest state authority.  It electsthe president and vice-president every five years, amends the constitution and establishes the Broad Guidelinesof State Policy (GBHN).  Direct (popular vote) election of the President is being considered for the nextelections in October 2004.
2 Previously, non-House members numbered 500 and were presidential appointees from political
parties, provinces, and interest groups.
3 Presidential Decree No. 44/2000 of 10 March 2000.
4 The Council, a national consultative forum, reports to the President (Presidential Decree No. 49,
No. 52/2000, 7 April 2000).
5 Provincial taxes apply to automotive and water transportation, and sale of such vehicles, automotive
gasoline, and land improvements, including for water reticulation.  A Kabupaten  tax covers, inter alia , hotel,
restaurant, entertainment, advertisement, and parking services.
6 While additional regional taxes outside a closed list were previously subject to approval from the
Ministry of Finance, new legislation allows provincial government councils to introduce non-stipulated taxesprovided they meet the statutory principles.  These prin ciples, although sound, are, poorly supervised, and theWT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 18
regional administration would add another layer of bureaucratic and official corruption.7  Regional
governments can also borrow, subject to debt lim its and additional controls imposed by the central
government, in the national interest (e.g. for macroeconomic stability).8
Box II.1:  Regional  decentralization
The Regional Autonomy Law (No. 22/99) governs the distribution of expenditure powers across
government levels, while the Law on Fiscal Balance (No. 25/99) controls the distribution of revenue acrossregions.  Regional authority was substantially rebalanced by elevating local governments to the samehierarchical relation with the central government as provinces, and having regional government heads
appointed by locally elected assemblies.
Local governments are responsible for health, education,  local infrastructure, and other public services.  A
negative list of functions, such as defence, foreign affairs, justice, religious affairs, macroeconomicmanagement, and national, strategic, and policy coordination, which are considered of national interest,
remain under central government control.  Provinces are responsible for services that span districts and for
inter-district coordination.
Central government transfers to regions were expanded substantially through revenue-sharing and grants.
The revenue-sharing base was changed to include oil, gas, forestry, fishing, and mining income as well as
income from taxes on land, real estate, and personal income.  Standard revenue-sharing rates for regions
were set at 15% for oil, 30% for gas, and 80% for other natural resources;  some provinces, such as Acehand Papua, with Special Autonomy Status were granted higher revenue-shares for oil and gas.  Sharedrevenue for regions totalled an estimated Rp 24,266 billion in 2002;  the 2003 forecast was
Rp 27,896 billion.
General purpose grants (general allocation fund (DAU)) were established to equalize fiscal capacities (and
thereby bridge the gap between regions' expenditure needs and revenue capacities).  These grants are to be aminimum of 25% of overall central government revenue, net of shared revenue.  A temporary formula usedin 2001, supplemented by historical factors to ensure that no region received less than previously, did not
achieve adequate fiscal equalization, and required add itional transfers to poorer regions.  A new formula was
adopted in 2002, along with an additional transitional component requiring no region to receive less than in
2001 (the "no harm" clause).  DAU funds totalled an estimated Rp 69,114 billion in 2002;  the 2003 forecastis Rp 76,978 billion.  Special earmarked  grants (under the special allocatio n fund (DAK)) also exist, but are
relatively small;  to date, they have been restricted to reforestation.  These totalled an estimated
Rp 658 billion in 2002, and are forecast at Rp 2,617 billion in 2003.
Regional governments were given increased, albeit still relatively low, revenue powers (Law on Regional
Taxes, No. 34/2000).  Regions can apply new taxes without central government approval provided certainlegislative criteria are met, including that they are in the public interest and do not cover areas already taxed
centrally.  The central government can cancel regional  taxes that do not meet these criteria.  Regional
governments also have greater borrowing autonomy;  direct central government control has been relaxed
and indebtedness limits have been applied;  long -term (domestic and external) debt cannot exceed 75% of
the region's revenue, and a ceiling revenue-debt service ratio of 2.5% applies.  External borrowings still
require central government approval.
Source: IMF, Indonesia: Selected Issues,  Country Report No. 02/154, July 2002, pp. 69-72 [Online].
Available at:  http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=15974.0].
                                                                                                                                                                    
courts for protecting citizens (and businessmen) against misuse of power by regional governments are weak
(World Bank, 2003, p. 22).
7 World Bank (2003), p. 21.
8 External borrowings still require central government approval.  Bans on regional borrowings were
imposed in 2001 and 2002 to assist fiscal stability;  at the time of completion of this report, no information wasavailable on whether such bans are still in place.Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 19
(3) STRUCTURE OF TRADE POLICY FORMULATION
(i) Executive branches of government
10. Final responsibility for the formulation and implementation of trade and other economic
policies remains largely with the President and Ca binet.  The President continues to chair the
Economic Stabilization Council and the Cabinet on Economic Affairs still considers policies before
submission to Council. The President also continues to chair the National Economic and Financial
Resilience Council, which supervises the implementation of the IMF programme.
11. The Minister of Industry and Trade has retained ministerial responsibility for trade and
industrial policy formulation;  since 1998 a new Directorate General for International Cooperation forIndustry and Trade has focussed on international, regional, and bilateral industrial and trade relations
as well as trade remedies (i.e. contingency measures).  The Government has only recently passed
legislation to establish an Anti-Corruption Co mmission as required under the IMF programme.
(ii) Advisory bodies
12. No independent body is responsible for publicly reviewing or advising government on trade
and sectoral assistance policies.  However, external advice is available to government from themultilateral institutions, such as the IMF and the World Bank, both of which have well-established
offices in Jakarta and have been instrumental in helping Indonesia to cope with the policy reforms
needed since the economic and financial crises.  Other institutions, such as the Asian Development
Bank, Partnership for Economic Growth–USAID, JICA , and the Harvard Institute for International
Development, also advise ministries on various trade and other economic policies.
(4) T
RADE POLICY OBJECTIVES
(i) General trade policy objectives
13. The aim of industrial and trade policies is to implement the structural reforms agreed with the
IMF and to meet WTO commitments.  As part of the IMF programme, Indonesia has adopted
unilateral reforms that in some cases, such as financial and other services, have substantially exceeded
its WTO commitments.
14. The Government is committed to further trade liberalization to promote economic
development and to alleviate poverty through social safety net programmes including food safety,
education, health, and employment creation.  According to the authorities, the role envisaged for trade
policy is to promote opportunity, community empowerment, and capacity building, focussing on
small and medium-sized enterprises.  National development and poverty alleviation are centralobjectives of the Assembly's 1999-04 State Policy Guidelines (GBHN).  National Development Plans
(Propenas and Repelita (now Repeta) programmes) also call for "economic recovery based on
increased competitiveness and economic efficiency".  Under GBHN, Propenas and Repeta the
development of industrial, trade, and investment policies is to increase Indonesia's global
competitiveness by providing access to employment and business opportunities in all regions.  Fivemajor strategies have been formulated to promote global competitiveness, i.e. development of exports,
industrial competitive advantage, and tourism;  strengthening of market institutions;  and
improvement of science and technology capabilities.WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 20
15. Indonesia is also committed  to voluntary unilateral trade liberalization within APEC  and
regional liberalization with other ASEAN members.  Expanding and diversifying higher value
processed exports is a high trade policy priority.
(ii) Sectoral trade policy objectives
16. While committed to structural reforms, including trade liberalization, Indonesia maintains
substantial state involvement in the economy, and divestment of state-owned enterprises, which is a
major element of the IMF programme, has lagged.  Most trade reforms, including reducing tariffs and
non-tariff measures, were implemented at the st art of the programme.  There was, however, some
backtracking on trade liberalization in a few sensitive sectors (e.g. rice, sugar, steel, logs), albeit withthe IMF’s agreement.
(iii) The WTO agenda
17. The Government is committed to a strong rules- based multilateral system that secures market
access to promote global economic growth, development, and employment.  However, Indonesia in its
statement at the Doha Ministerial Conference in 2001, expressed concern with "implementation
issues", which it feels need to be resolved to restore WTO credibility.
9  It considers that some
members have not complied with their multilateral obligations, and various provisions need
improvement, such as those concerning anti-dumping, textiles and clothing, and subsidies and
countervailing rules.  Global benefits of trade liberalization would, in Indonesia's view, be more
equitably distributed if "special and differential" treatment were extended to developing countries,
including in agriculture, to accommodate their non-trade concerns, such as rural development, poverty
alleviation, and food security.  Meaningful safeguards in TRIPS are also needed to ensure developing
countries have full access to medicines to protect public health.  Indonesia supports the extension ofservices negotiations without a priori  sector exclusions, provided developing countries are allowed to
open fewer sectors and transactions, and the inclusion of emergency safeguard measures.
18. Since 1999, Indonesia has included independent WTO experts to strengthen its multilateral
trade negotiating team in the Doha Round
10;  other team participants are 26 first echelon officials from
related institutions/ministries and a representative of the Chamber of Commerce.
(5) TRADE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
19. Indonesia is keen to strengthen trade and business laws and regulations to improve the
commercial environment and encourage competition, efficiency, and corporate governance.  Manyrelevant laws, regulations, and decrees have been revised or introduced in many key areas, including
the prohibition of monopolistic practices
11, fiscal stimulus (i.e. reduction of luxury taxes, income tax,
and value-added tax for certain commodities ostensibly to cut production costs)12, financial services,
especially banking;  and more are expected.  More transparent laws and institutional arrangements
will also reduce public corruption and facilitate investment, including from overseas.  As the bankingcrisis showed, regulations must be backed with the institutional processes necessary to ensure
                                                     
9 WT/MIN(01)/ST/39, 11 November 2001.
10 The Jakarta Post , 6 February 2002;  Presidential Decrees No. 104, 1999 (Kepres 104 1999), No. 18,
2001 (Kepres 18, 2001), and No. 16, 2002.
11 Law No.5, 1999.
12 This fiscal stimulus was reportedly issued by the Ministry of Finance in January 2003;  no further
information on this measure was ma de available to the Secretariat.Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 21
compliance.  Despite improvements, remaining w eaknesses contribute to the perception abroad that
Indonesia is a high-risk country for investment and conducting business.
20. Accelerated implementation of legal and judicial reforms to establish rule of law is needed to
improve governance and the investment environment, which remain handicapped by the perception of
judicial corruption.13  The operation of the separate Commercial Courts, established in 1998, and
Indonesia’s Bankruptcy Law, for example, seem to provide little security for creditors on debtrecovery or contract enforcement, and, in practice, seem to treat foreign and domestic companies
differently.
14  The authorities maintain that the legal framework does not contain any discriminatory
elements.
21. Indonesian legislation is published in the Official Government Gazette .  Many laws,
regulations, and decrees are available in English.  For example, the Ministry of Industry and Tradepublishes trade laws and regulations on its website in English.
15  Bank Indonesia also publishes its
regulations and circular letters bi-annually in English.16  Ministries and agencies are increasingly
creating websites to disseminate information, some in English.
(6) TRADE AGREEMENTS AND ARRANGEMENTS
(i) Multilateral agreements
22. Indonesia is an active WTO Member.  In the period under review, Indonesia has made
numerous notifications to the WTO (Table II.1).  Incomplete notifications cover mainly bi-annual
reports of quantitative restrictions, state trading, safeguards, subsidies and countervailing measures,
import licensing (replies to questionnaire in 1997, 1999, 2000, and 2001), and customs valuation
(checklist, interest charges, and carriers media).17  Indonesia has regularly submitted tariff and import
data to the WTO Integrated Database.
23. Indonesia has observer status in the WTO plurilateral Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft,
but is neither a member nor observer of the Agreement on Government Procurement.  It is a party to
the Multilateral Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products (the Information
Technology Agreement).
24. Indonesia remains a member of the Cairns Group of agricultural producers and exporters, a
group of WTO Members pushing for multilateral trade liberalization in agriculture, including major
reforms to market access, domestic support, and export subsidies.  The authorities indicated that the
entire Cairns Group proposals are not necessarily in line with Indonesian national interests;  therefore,
Indonesia may possibly develop its own agri cultural proposals in certain areas.
                                                     
13 IMF (2002c).
14 U.S. Embassy Jakarta (2001a).
15 Available at:  http:/www.dprin.go.id/regulasi1/english/inat2002.asp [12 December 2002].
16 For example, Bank Indonesia (2000).
17 WTO document G/L/223/Rev.9, 12 November 2002.WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 22
Table II.1
Status of notification requirements to the WTO, as at February 2003
WTO Agreement Description of requirement PeriodicityDocument symbol of most
recent notification
Anti-dumping (Article 18.5) Laws and regulations Once by March 1995,
then changesG/ADP/N/1/IDN/2/Suppl.1,
26 March 1999
Anti-dumping (Article 16.4) Anti-dumping actions taken Semi-annual G/ADP/N/98/IDN,
28 February 2003
Anti-dumping (Article 5.8) Time-period for determination of
negligible import volumesAd hoc G/ADP/N/100/IDN,
13 February 2003
Agriculture(Articles 10 and 18.2)Export subsidies (outlays and quantities) Annual G/AG/N/IND/25,
8 October 2001
Agriculture (Article 18.2) Domestic support Annual G/AG/N/IDN/26,
5 October 2001;
C/AG/N/IDN/26/Corr.1,
27 November 2001
Agriculture (Article 18.2) Information on tariff quotas
administration (MA:1)Once, then changes G/AG/N/IDN/24,
8 October 2001
Agriculture (Article 18.2) Volume of imports under tariff quotas
(MA:2)Annual G/AG/N/IND/23,
8 October 2001
Agriculture(Articles 5.7 and 18.2)Special safeguard measures Annual G/AG/N/IND/22,
8 October 2001
Customs Valuation(Article 22.2)Laws and regulations Once, then changes G/VAL/N/1/IND/1,
27 September 2001
Import Licensing Procedures(Articles 1.4(a) and 8.2(b))Laws and regulations relevant to import
licensingOnce, then changes G/LIC/N/1/IND/1,
2 November 1998
Import Licensing Procedures(Article 7.3)Questionnaire; rules and information
concerning procedures for the
submission of applicationsAnnual for
questionnaire; rules and
information, once thenchangesG/LIC/N/3/IND/1,
2 November 1998
GATT 1994(Article XVII:4(a) –
Understanding on the
Interpretation of Article XVII)Notification of products traded by state
enterprisesOnce, then changes G/STR/N/8/IDN, 23
August 2002
Preshipment Inspection(Article V)Laws/regulations (including those by
which the Agreement is brought intoforce)Once (upon entry into
force of the WTOAgreement) or ad hocG/PSI/N/1/Add.6, 6 June 1997
Rules of Origin
(Article 5.1 and Annex II(4))Preferential rules of origin Within 90 days of WTO
AgreementG/RO/N/16, 5 March 1997
Safeguards (Article 12.6) Laws and regulations Once by March 1995,
then changesG/SG/N/1/IND/1,
11 April 1995
Safeguards (Article 12.5) Consultations Ad hoc S/SG/N/12/IDN/1, 4 May 2000
Safeguards (Article 12.7) Pre-existing measures Within 60 days of the
WTO AgreementG/SG/N/3/IDN, 21 April 1995
Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures
(Article 6, Annex B)Notification of emergency measures, and
changesAd hoc G/SPS/N/IDN/18,
13 June 2002
Services (GATS Article III:3) Changes to laws and regulations
affecting servicesAd hoc S/C/N/81, 18 November 1998
Subsidies and Countervailing
Measures (Article 25.12)Authorities and procedures for initiating
and conducting investigationsOnce, then changes G/SCM/N/18/Add.6,
27 March 1998
Subsidies and CountervailingMeasures (Article 25.1)Subsidies programmes Annual G/SCM/N/16/IDN/Suppl.1,
19 March 1998
Subsidies and CountervailingMeasures (Article 32.6)Laws and regulations Once by March 1995,
then changesG/SCM/N/IDN/2/Suppl.1,
26 March 1999
Subsidies and CountervailingMeasures (Article 25.11)Countervailing duty actions taken Semi-annual and when
measure takenG/SCM/N/81/Add.1/Rev.1,
18 October 2002
Technical Barriers toTrade (Article 15.2)Laws and regulations Once, then change G/TBT/N/IDN/2,
10 December 2001
Table II.1 (cont'd)Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 23
WTO Agreement Description of requirement PeriodicityDocument symbol of most
recent notification
Technical Barriers to Trade
(Article 10.6 )Information about technical regulations,
standards and conformity assessment
proceduresAd hoc G/TBT/N/IDN/4,
23 April 2002
Textiles and Clothing(Articles 2.8 and 2:11)Notification of programmes of
integration12 months before their
coming into effectGTMB/N/381/Rev.1,
14 May 2001
TRIMs (Article 5.1) Investment measures Once by March 1995,
then changesG/TRIMS/N/1/IDN/1/Add.1,
31 October 1996
TRIPS (Article 63.2) Laws and regulations Once, then changes IP/N/1/IDN/P/1, 27 April 2000
TRIPS (Article 69) Contact points Once, then changes IP/N/3/Rev.6, 1 March 2002
Source : WTO Central Registry of Notifications.
(ii) Preferential, regional, and bilateral arrangements
(a) Preferential arrangements for developing and least developed countries
25. Indonesia provides preferential tariff treatment to certain imports from other developing
countries under the Global System of Trade Preferences (GSTP), which it joined in October 1989.
The Second Round of negotiations was concluded in December 1998, and Indonesia and 23 other
members exchanged additional preferential tariff concessions.  Members were to have ratified the
1998 Protocol by end 2001.  At present, Indonesia grants GSTP tariff concessions on 31 tariff items at
preferential margins of mainly 10%, but also 20%;  eligible products should have a cumulated valueof not less than 60% of their f.o.b. price from GSTP participating countries (GSTP certificates of
origin were renewed in January 2003).  The authorities consider that the GSTP scheme provides good
opportunities for Indonesia to diversify non-oil exports to developing country markets.  Indonesia
benefits from the Generalized System of Prefer ences (GSP) schemes operated by most developed
countries.  Indonesia graduated from GSP eligibil ity for EU exports of wood, footwear, and animal
fats and oils in January 1998;  apart from confirming that the EU scheme was still important to
Indonesia, the authorities provided no other information on the impact of this development.
(b) Regional arrangements
ASEAN
26. Indonesia, an ASEAN founding member, part icipates in the ASEAN Free-Trade Area
(AFTA).  For the six original members tariffs are to be reduced on intra-ASEAN trade (with at least
40% ASEAN content) under the Common Effective Pr eferential Tariff (CEPT) to a maximum 5% by
end 2002, or end 2003 on a few products.
18  At end 2001, the Inclusion List of tariff items covered by
the CEPT represented, on average, 85% of the tariff lines of all ASEAN member nations (98% for
original members)19;  93% of total tariff items covered by the CEPT for original members had
maximum tariffs of 5% (38% were duty free).  The average CEPT tariff on all members was 3.7%
(down from 12.8% in 1993), and is expected to fall to 2.7% in 2003.20  Members also agreed in 1999
to eliminate all import duties among original members by 2010, and, in principle, to advance such
                                                     
18 The original aim was to achieve the CEPT by 2008, but this was accelerated for the original
members to 2003 and subsequently to 2002 for most products following the financial crisis.  Longer transitional
periods were provided new ASEAN members:  2006 for Viet Nam;  2008 for Laos and Myanmar;  and 2010 forCambodia.
19 The share for the four new members was 57%.
20 Average tariffs ranged from zero for Singapore to 7.4% for Thailand.WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 24
elimination for new members from 2018 to 2015, except for some sensitive products.  Quantitative
restrictions and other non-tariff barriers are also to be eliminated.
27. Products may be excluded from the CEPT scheme as either temporary or general exclusions,
or as sensitive products.21  Products temporarily excluded (i.e. placed on the Temporary Exclusion
List, TEL) were to be included in CEPT in equal instalments over five years, beginning on
1 January 1995.  However, a new Protocol was agreed in October 2000, under which the six originalfounding members may request temporary delay of CEPT tariff liberalization for products that were
in the TEL as of 31 December 1999
22;  Members are expected to agree on compensation to other
ASEAN partners.23  At end 2001, TEL products accounted for 0.6% of ASEAN tariff lines for
original members;  Brunei, Singapore, Thailand, and, according to the authorities, Indonesia had none
(nor did Indonesia have any intention to invoke the Protocol).  General (and permanent) exceptionsapply to products deemed necessary to protect national security, public morals, human, animal or
plant life and health, articles of artistic, historic, or archaeological value;  these cover about 1% of
ASEAN tariff lines.  The authorities indicated that Indonesia has 27 nine-digit HS items of alcoholic
beverages and 4 nine-digit HS items of explosives listed under general exceptions.
28. Indonesia has continued to transfer additional products progressively to the CEPT scheme;  at
end 2002, 99% of Indonesian tariff lines were covered, with tariff rates of 5% or less.
24  Indonesia's
CEPT tariffs averaged 4.6% at end 2001 (down from 7.0% in 1993), and are to fall to 3.7% in 2003.
At end 2001, Indonesia had 21 tariff items subject to temporary exclusions and another four items
were excluded as sensitive products.   The authorities indicated that Indonesia has had no TEL (or
sensitive products) since January 2003.
29. ASEAN countries are also negotiating intra-regional services liberalization (the 1995 ASEAN
Framework Agreement on trade in services).  Three packages of commitments from two rounds ofnegotiations have liberalized trade in air transport,  business services, construction, financial services,
maritime transport, telecommunications, and tourism.  A third round of negotiations was launched in
September 2001, to begin in 2002 and end in 2004, covering all specified sectors and modes of
supply.  Members agreed in 2001 to accelerate services liberalization and to negotiate mutual
recognition arrangements for professional services.
30. Other agreements aimed at promoting intra-ASEAN trade, investment and greater regional
integration include the ASEAN Industrial Coopera tion Scheme (AICO) and the ASEAN Investment
Area (AIA).  The AICO, signed in 1996, encourages  technology-based investments in ASEAN, and
any ASEAN-based company meeting certain conditions is eligible.
25  AICO-approved products, raw
                                                     
21 A small number of sensitive agricultural products will be allowed until 2010 to be integrated into the
CEPT scheme.  In an agreement yet to be fully finalized, tariff reductions on these products will begin between2000 and 2005, depending on the country and the product.
22 ASEAN (2000).  The Protocol covers the delayed transfer of products from TEL into CEPT and
suspension of concessions on the last tranche of TEL manufactured products at 31 December 1999 (or other
relevant dates for new members), where such liberalization would "cause real problems, by reasons not covered
by emergency measures" (Article 1).  Delays or suspensions may be reviewed annually by the AFTA Council(Article 8).
23 Compensatory adjustment measures are to "ens ure a general level of reciprocal and mutually
advantageous concessions not less favourable to trade than that provided for and prevailing" beforehand, andmust be applied on an MFN basis to all ASEAN members (Articles 3 and 5).
24 By 2003, at least 60% of CEPT items in Indonesia as well as other original ASEAN members are
expected to be duty free.
25 It must be incorporated in and operating in an ASEAN country;  have a minimum 30% ASEAN
equity;  and be engaged in some type of resource sharing (e.g. sharing of technology, market sharing, orconsolidated purchases of raw materials).  At least two companies in two ASEAN countries must participate.Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 25
materials, and intermediate inputs are immediately su bject to no more than 5% tariffs, and eligible for
local-content accreditation and non-tariff incentives.26  The AIA, signed in October 1998, aims to
increase foreign investment from ASEAN and non-ASEAN regional sources by removing barriers to
all ASEAN investors by 2010 and for all investors by 2020.27  Sectors specified in the temporary
exclusion and sensitive lists are to be excluded.28  Members (including Indonesia) agreed to remove
their temporary exclusion lists for ASEAN investors in manufacturing as from 2003.  Temporaryexclusion lists in manufacturing, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and mining are to be fully removed by
2010 for the ASEAN-6 and by 2015 for new members.
31. ASEAN members are increasingly pursuing bilateral cooperation with non-member States,
and other regional inter-governmental organizations.
29  The ASEAN +3 members (China, Japan, and
the Republic of Korea) agreed in November 2002 to study and formulate options to graduallyestablish an East Asia Free Trade Area
30;  Indonesia sees an opportunity to increase the level of
cooperation and to further expand trade and investment flows among the countries of East Asia.
Indonesia also has agreed to establish an ASEAN-China Free-Trade Area within ten years.31
Indonesia expects that such an FTA would increase intra-regional trade and investment, raiseeconomic efficiency and economies of scale, bring greater business opportunities, and expandeconomic cooperation.  Thus, Indonesia, through ASEAN, is actively pursuing regional trade
liberalization.
APEC
32. Indonesia intends to implement APEC's volunt ary target, set in the Bogor Declaration in
1994, of open and free trade, including in services and investment for developing country members by
2020.
32  APEC economies are to achieve their targets on a voluntary and non-binding basis
("concerted unilateral liberalization") using Individual Action Plans (IAPs).  These are updatedannually and contain the intended actions in 15 pol icy areas towards realizing APEC's liberalization
goals.  For example, Indonesia indicated in its 2002 IAP that, inter alia , tariff reductions would be
continuously implemented in the near future so that rates range between zero and 10% by 2003;
                                                                                                                                                                    
The conditions, particularly the 30% ASEAN equity requirement, may be waived under certain circumstances.
At April 2002, there were 90 approved AICO ventures, with an annual transaction value of US$1.09 billion.
26 Non-tariff incentives are to be determined individually by each country, and are yet to be specified.
27 It is based on opening all industries to foreign investment, and phasing out exclusions according to
schedules;  immediate national treatment for ASEAN investors, with few exceptions;  eliminating investment
impediments;  streamlining investment process and procedures;  enhancing transparency;  and undertaking
investment facilitation measures.
28 An initial list of temporary exclusions, covering agriculture, forestry, and mining, was adopted at the
AIA Ministerial Meeting in October 2000.
29 These include the Andean Council, the Australia–New Zealand Closer Economic Relations (CER),
the Economic Cooperation Organization, the Gulf Cooperation Council, MERCOSUR, the Rio Group, the South
Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, and the South Pacific Forum.  Most ASEAN members are also
active participants in the activities of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, the Asia-EuropeMeeting (ASEM), and the East As ia-Latin America Forum (EALAF).
30 ASEAN (2002).
31 ASEAN (2002).  The Report of the ASEAN–China Expert Group on Economic Co-operation,
considered at the ASEAN Leaders Summit (Bandar Seri Begawan, 5-6 November 2001), estimated that an
ASEAN-China FTA could increase ASEAN's exports to Ch ina by 48% and China's exports to ASEAN by 55%,
and boost respective GDPs by 0.9% and 0.3%.
32 Formed in 1989, APEC currently consists of:  Australia;  Brunei Darussalam;  Canada;  Chile;
China;  Chinese Taipei;  Hong Kong, China;  Indonesia;  Japan;  Korea;  Malaysia;  Mexico;  New Zealand;Papua New Guinea;  Peru;  Philippines;  Russia;  Singapore;  Thailand;  the United States;  and Viet Nam.WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 26
export restrictions (e.g. bans) would be further eliminated, and reduced export taxes would be
scheduled.33
33. APEC's liberalization objectives are based on key Bogor General Principles of
comprehensiveness, WTO consistency, and non-discrimination (or open regionalism), whereby
liberalization should not discriminate betwee n APEC economies, nor between them and non-APEC
countries.  Nonetheless, many APEC economies, in cluding ASEAN members, have either formed or
are contemplating regional trading arrangements th at discriminate against other APEC and non-APEC
economies.
34. APEC has strengthened its peer review proce ss to examine more rigorously the progress of
APEC economies in achieving their free and open trade and investment targets.34  Indonesia's review
is scheduled for 2005.
(c) Bilateral arrangements
35. At present, Indonesia is not a member of any bilateral trading arrangements and is not
negotiating any.  However, Indonesia intends to  establish comprehensive bilateral trading
arrangements (i.e. FTAs) with countries, such as Canada, Chile, Japan, and the United States.
(7) TRADE DISPUTES AND CONSULTATIONS
(i) Dispute settlement under the GATT/WTO
36. Indonesia has been involved in a few disputes within the GATT/WTO since its last Trade
Policy Review (Table II.2).  It was respondent in one case, "Certain Measures Affecting the
Automobile Industry", involving the EC, Japan, and the United States as complainants.  The Panel
concluded that both Indonesia’s 1993 Programme linking local-content requirements to certain sales
tax and custom duty benefits, and the 1996 National Car Programme violated its multilateral
commitments.  Indonesia agreed to comply fully with the decision.  Indonesia was allowed until23 July 1999 to implement the Panel's findings.
35  The 1996 Programme was repealed in
January 1998.  Indonesia notified the WTO that a new policy package on the automotive industry in
1999 had removed all WTO-inconsistent elements of the 1993 car programme.36
37. Indonesia was co-complainant in a Panel on the U.S. "Continued Dumping and Subsidy
Offset Act of 2000";  the Panel Report was issued in September 2002.  It concluded that the Act was
inconsistent with GATT, and that the legislation should preferably be repealed.37  The United States
appealed to the Appellate Body in October 2002.38
                                                     
33 APEC (2002a).
34 APEC (2002b).
35 WTO document WT/54/12, 7 December 1998.
36 WTO document WT/DS54/17/Add.1,  15 July 1999;  Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade
No. 275/SK/MPP/6/1999.
37 Specifically the Act was found to be inconsistent with AD Articles 5.4, 18.1 and 18.4, SCM Articles
11.4, 32.1 and 32.5, Articles VI:2 and VI:3 of the GATT 1994, and Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement.  SeeWTO document WT/DS217/R, 16 September 2002.
38 WTO document WT/DS217/8, 22 October 2002.Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 27
Table II.2
Involvement in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, as at February 2003
Defendant/ Dispute ComplainantRequest for
consultation/ panelPanel
established/
Panel reportcirculatedAppeal
requestedPanel/
Appellate
Body Reportadopted
Indonesia - Certain Measures
Affecting Automobile
IndustryEC (WT/DS54/1)
Japan (WT/DS55/1)
United States (WT/DS59/1)03.10.96/ 12.05.97
04.10.96/ 18.04.97
08.10.96/ 13.06.9712.06.97/
02.07.9823.07.98a
Argentina – Safeguard
Measures on Imports ofFootwearIndonesia (WT/DS123/1) 22.04.98/ 16.04.99b23.07.98/
25.06.9915.09.99 12.01.00/
12.01.00
United States – ContinuedDumping and Subsidy Act of
2000Australia, Brazil, Chile, the
EC, India, Indonesia, Japan,
Korea, and Thailand
(WT/DS217/1)21.12.00/ 13.07.01 23.08.01/
l6.09.0218.10.02 27.01.03
a Binding arbitration awarded Indonesia until 23 July 1999 to comply fully with the Panel's findings instead of 23 October as
proposed by Indonesia (WTO document WT/54/12, 7 December 1998).  Indonesia informed the WTO in 1999 (WTO document
WT/DS54/17/Add.1, 15 July) that it had removed all WTO-inconsistent elements of the 1993 car programme.
b Indonesia subsequently withdrew its request for a panel (WTO document WT/DS123/4, 11 May 1999), but participated as a third
party in the case requested by the EU.
Source: WTO Secretariat.
38. A request by Indonesia in April 1999 to establish a Panel on Argentina's "Safeguard Measures
on Imports of Footwear" was subsequently withdrawn.39  Indonesia, however, reserved its rights to
participate as a third party in the EU panel's proceedings.40
(ii) Other
39. ASEAN has a dispute settlement mechanism similar to the WTO to resolve disputes among
members regarding any economic agreement.  The authorities indicated that so far trade and economicdisputes between ASEAN members have been resolved amicably through bilateral
consultation/discussion;  Indonesia has never had recourse to ASEAN's dispute settlement
mechanism.
(8) F
OREIGN INVESTMENT REGIME
(i) Recent performance and developments
40. Foreign direct investment collapsed after the financial crisis;  it has not yet recovered because
economic, political, and security uncertainties have affected investor confidence (Chapter I).
Indonesia quickly introduced measures to liberalize investment in 1997 and 1998, including allowing
foreign firms to operate retail outlets, opening the distribution and banking sectors much more to
foreign investment, and shortening the negative list of activities closed to foreign investment.41
41. Despite economic and political difficulties since then, Indonesia has maintained a relatively
open investment regime, and has introduced measures to streamline investment approvals and to
                                                     
39 The request was made in WTO document WT/DS123/3, 16 April 1999, and withdrawn in WTO
document WT/DS123/4, 11 May 1999.
40 The Panel Report is in WTO document WT/DS121/R, 25 June 1999, and the Appellate Body Report
is in WTO document WT/DS121/AB/R, 14 December 1999.
41 WTO (1999).WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 28
facilitate foreign investment.42  The Investment Co-ordinating Board (BKPM) is responsible for
promoting and approving both domestic and foreign non-oil and gas investment (apart from banking
and insurance).43  A new draft investment law, to replace the 1967 legislation, was released in
October 2000, and was to be submitted to Parliament in February 2003.  The draft law, inter alia ,
replaces investor approval with registration, allows for wholly foreign-owned enterprises to invest in
most sectors, and full national treatment of foreign investors, whenever possible.44
42. The investment negative list, aimed at, inter alia , protecting Indonesians from moral hazard,
ensuring state security, and supporting small and medium-sized enterprises, was relaxed in 2000.45  A
few activities (e.g. production of cyclamate, saccharine, and alcoholic drinks) remain closed to all
private investment;  some others (such as local taxi/bus transportation services, lumber contractors,
and the movie industry) are closed to foreign investors (Table II.3).  A number of activities are opento investment only as joint ventures (e.g. building and operation of seaports; power generation,
transmission and distribution; shipping; telecommuni cations; and commercial airliners) or if certain
(unspecified) conditions are met (e.g. certain s ea fishing, wood pulp production, special printing,
plywood production in the Papua province, and some freshwater fisheries if in conjunction with
small-scale businesses).   Foreign equity limits (not specified in the list) apply to joint ventures;
minimum local ownership of 5% of the total capital is required, depending upon the activity.
46
Foreign companies operating in Indonesia  must also divest a share (usually 1% to 5%) to an
Indonesian citizen and/or corporation, within 15 years from the date it started production.47
43. Although not on the negative list, some sectors remain reserved for small-scale enterprises,
and their coverage has been widened (covering 19 activities in the chicken, fishery, forestry, mining,
industrial, trading, transportation, telecommunications, and health industries).  Large-scale domestic
or foreign investors are allowed only in partnership with a small local business or cooperative (tubers-related agricultural businesses, certain fish cultivation, forestry).
48  The authorities consider
small-scale business activity to have a strategic role in national economic development.
44. Certain provinces, e.g. Jakarta District, West Java, West and East Kalimantan, took over the
approval of foreign investment proposals directly in January 2000.  This process was to have been
extended further in 2001 under the decentralization changes.  However, a degree of uncertaintyappears to have surrounded the devolution of investment approvals.  While provinces appear to be
keen to have much greater control over investment approvals (both foreign and domestic) and the new
legislation (Law 22/99) assigned such approval of non-oil and gas projects to the provinces, it seems
that this has remained a central government function by Presidential Decree.  Nonetheless, greater
responsibility seems to have been devolved to regions for investment approval, largely through themore autonomous provincial BKPM boards.  However, the existing arrangements, including the
likelihood of changes in the respective powers of the central and local governments as well as
amendments to the investment rules and procedures, are unclear;  and inconsistent investment
processes across regions may be the result.  Enhanced taxation powers may also enable local
governments to impose taxes or levies on investors (especially foreign);  this is another source ofinvestor uncertainty, especially in sectors like mi ning, which require long investment horizons, and
                                                     
42 U.S. Embassy Jakarta (2001a).
43 The BKPM is no longer merged with the Office of the State Minister for Investment (Presidential
Decree No. 03/2001).
44 Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia (2002).
45 Presidential Decree No. 96/2000.
46 Government Regulation PP No. 20/1994 Jo. No. 83/2001.
47 Government Regulation No. 20/1994 and Ministry of Investment Decree No. 15/1994.
48 Presidential Decree No. 99/98 on small-scale enterprises as amended by Presidential Decree
No. 127/2001 (published on 14 December 2001).Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 29
where predictable investment and taxation regimes are most needed.  There are also concerns that
decentralization of investment approval may accentuate corrupt practices.49
Table II.3
Investment negative list, as from 2000
No. Business activity
I. ABSOLUTELY CLOSED FOR INVESTMENT (DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN)
Agriculture
1. Cultivation and processing of marijuana and the like
Marine and fishery
2. Collection/utilization of sponge
Industrial and trading
3. Chemicals harmful to the environment, e.g. penta chlorophenol, dichloro dipenhul trichloro ethane (DDT), dieldrin, chlordane,
carbon tetra chloride, chloro fluoro carbon (CFC), methyl bromide, methyl chloroform, halon, etc.
4. Chemicals stipulated in schedule 1 of the Chemical Weapon Convention – sarin, soman, tabun, mustard, levisite, ricine,
saxitoxin
5. Weapons and related components
6. Cyclamate and saccharine
7. Alcoholic drinks e.g. liquor, wine and beer (drinks containing malt)
8. Casino and gambling facilities
Communication
9. Air traffic system providers (ATS providers), ship certification and classification inspections
10. Management and operation of radio frequency spectrum and satellite orbit monitoring stations
Mining and energy
11. Mining of radioactive minerals
II. CLOSED TO ANY FOREIGN INVESTMENT (CLOSED TO INVESTMENT IN WHICH A SHARE IS OWNED BY
FOREIGN CITIZEN AND/OR FOREIGN BUSINESS ENTITIES)
Forestry and plantation
12. Germ plasm cultivation
13. Concession for natural forests
14. Contractors in the field of lumbering
Communication
15. Taxi/bus transportation services
16. Small-scale sailing
Trading
17. Trading and trading support services, except large-scale retailers (malls, supermarkets, department stores, shopping centres ),
wholesale trading (distributors/wholesalers, exporters, and importers), exhibition/convention service providers, quality
certification service providers, market research service providers, warehousing services outside seaports, and after-sale servi ce
Information
18. Radio and television broadcasting, services providers, radio and closed-circuit television broadcasting services, and multim edia
and printed media
19. Motion picture production (film production, film technical services, export and import film business, film distributors and
operation of motion picture theatres
III. OPEN TO INVESTMENT UNDER THE CONDITION OF A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN FOREIGN AND
DOMESTIC INVESTORS
20. Building and operation of seaports
21. Electricity production, transmission and distribution
22. Shipping
23. Processing and provision of potable water for public use
24. Medical services, including the building and operation of hospitals, medical check-ups, clinical laboratories, mental
rehabilitation, public health maintenance security, rent of medical equipment, assistance services for health aid and evacuatio n
of patients under emergency conditions, hospital management services and services for testing, maintenance and repair of
medical equipment
Table II.3 (cont'd)
                                                     
49 World Bank (2003), p. 21.WT/TPR/S/117 Trade Policy Review
Page 30
No. Business activity
25. Telecommunications
26. Regular/non-regular commercial airliners
IV. OPEN TO INVESTMENT UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS
Marine and fishery sector
27. Cultivation of freshwater fish (a) open to foreign investment for freshwater turtles, nila gift, sidat, kodok lembu, freshwater
giant shrimps and thillapya sp (b) in cooperation with small-scale fishery business
28. Fishing of demersal fish (big fish, grouper and other sea fish, except ZEEI areas of the Malacca Strait and Arafura Sea
Industrial
29. Wood pulp (a) raw material obtained from imported chips or quarantine of raw material supplied from industrial timber estate s
(HTI) (b) other than sulphonating and/or chlorination (C 12)
30. Pulp made from cellulose fibres or other materials, except sulphonating and/or chlorination (C 12)
31. Chloro alkali, except using mercury
32. Finished/semi-finished goods made from mangrove wood – raw material coming from mangrove cultivation
33. Money printing – operational licences from BOTASUPAL-BAKIN and approval from Bank Indonesia required
34. Special printing – postal stamps, duty stamps, Bank Indonesia negotiable papers, passports and stamped postal matter;
operational licences needed from BOTASUPAL-BAKIN
35. Milk processing (powder and condensed sweetened condensed milk (processing not repackaging)
36. Plywood and rotary veneer (only for the Irian Jaya Province (Papua)
37. Sawn timber (a) only for the Irian Jaya province (Papua) (b) or outside, only using logs from non-natural forests
38. Ethyl alcohol – technical grade, being only used as raw materials and auxiliary materials of other industries
39. Raw materials for explosives (ammonium nitrate) – only in cooperation with business entities, which have security devices and
recommended by the Ministry of Defence
40. Explosives and components for industrial (commercial) use (a) only in cooperation with business entities recommended by the
Ministry of Defence, (b) only manufacturing;  storage and distribution are provided by companies appointed by the Government
41. Electricity planning and supervision consulting services, open to foreign investment provided capacities above (a) 50MW for
hydro power plant (PLTA), (b) 55MW for steam power plants (PLTU), (c) 55MW for geothermal power plants (PLTP), (d)
main electrical relay stations and transmission networks with voltage above 500 KV
42. Electricity equipment construction, maintenance, installation services, development of technology supporting the supply of
electricity and testing of electricity installations – open to foreign investment providing that main electrical relay stations  and
transmission networks have capacity above 500 KV
43. Petroleum and natural gas drilling services – open to foreign investment provided (a) only for offshore drilling, (b) especiall y
outside the eastern Indonesian region in cooperation with national partners of business field
44. Power plants in locations outside Java, Bali, and Madura
Trading
45. Restaurants – open to foreign investment if located in tourism areas/zones and/or integrated with hotels
46. Game services – open to foreign investment if located in tourism areas/zones and/or integrated with hotels
Source: BKPM, based on Presidential Decree No. 96/2000, jo.118/2000.
45. Foreign investors are not required to purchase locally or export a minimum share of
production.  Foreign investors are expected to contribute to the training and development ofIndonesian nationals.  Generally, a company can hire foreigners only for positions deemed open to
non-Indonesians by the Government.  Employers mu st put in place manpower-training programmes
aimed at replacing foreign workers with Indonesians.
46. The World Bank’s Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) resumed offering
political risk insurance coverage to foreign investors in Indonesia in February 2001.  This followedthe Government’s reimbursement to MIGA of a US$15 million claim paid in 2000 to Enron Java
Power Company (Enron) on a government-cancelled power project in 1997.  Indonesia also belongs
to the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and the United Nations
Commission on International Trade Laws (UNCIT RAL).  Investors may also use the Indonesian
Investment Arbitration Board (BANI) to help reso lve disputes. Indonesia has investment protection
agreements with 52 countries and double tax treaties with 50.Indonesia WT/TPR/S/117
Page 31
(a) Streamlining investment procedures
47. While BKPM is the main investment approval agency, investors also usually have to work
closely with other departments, such as the Ministry of Finance, and increasingly with regional and
local authorities as a result of decentralization.  A number of measures have simplified the approval
process, such as reducing cumbersome documentary requirements, including obtaining particular
approvals and permits from regional governments.  Initial investment approval periods have beenshortened from many months to ten working days, on average.  This provides a temporary operating
licence for up to three years (extendable) to comm ence commercial activities.  However, commercial
production requires BKPM to issue a permanent business licence;  this can take months.
(b) Incentives
48. Investment incentives apply to all, including foreign, investors.  They include duty and VAT
concessions on imported inputs and capital goods, and additional incentives for export-oriented
investment as well as investment in certain regions (e.g. eastern Indonesia).  Special investment
incentives, such as income tax, value-added tax, and luxury tax exemptions, may also be approved by
BKPM on a case-by-case basis.
50  The criteria for granting tax holidays, of up to eight years, for new
investors in designated "pioneer" industries, such as capital goods, sea and air transport, andagri-businesses, were clarified in 1999
51;  these measures were largely eliminated under the IMF
package in January 2000.
                                                     
50 U.S. Embassy Jakarta (2001a).
51 Presidential Decision No. 7, Evaluation Criteria for Taxation Facilities in Particular Industrial Fields.