RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONS/C/W/47
9 July 1998
(98-2748)
Council for Trade in Services
ADVERTISING SERVICES
Background Note by the Secretariat
1. This Note is intended to contribute to the information exchange programme currently
conducted by the Council for Trade in Services.  Complementing similar Notes on other sectors, it
briefly discusses economic and regulatory developments, in the advertising industry as well as relatedsectors, deemed to affect trade in advertising services.  The purpose of the Note is to stimulate, rather
than to substitute for, the exchange of more  specific information between WTO Members and, in
addition, draw attention to some generic issues that may warrant further consideration.
2. The Note is organized in five Sections.  While Section I describes the main economic forces
deemed to determine level and structure of advertising activities, Section II discusses the strengthsand weaknesses of different regulatory approaches towards the sector.  Section III provides a brief
overview of existing commitments under Articles XVI and XVII of the GATS and the – relatively
few – limitations made (except for Mode 4).  Building on preceding parts of the Note, Section IV then
suggests themes Members may find useful to discuss further.  A closing Section lists some national
and international business associations and other sources which may be able to provide additionalinformation on the sector.
I. MAIN ECONOMIC FEATURES
3. Advertising is generally considered to be a "growth industry" with a significant potential for
future expansion in many countries.  As people grow richer and markets more diversified, companies
commit additional funds to attracting consumer attention, building brand loyalties and/or creating
niches for new products.  Thus, the intensity of advertising tends to be positively correlated with percapita income.  While in certain developed markets, advertisers may spend over US$300 annually per
head of population, the corresponding figures for developing countries typically remain below US$50.
However, there are significant country-specific variations.  For example, in the United States and
Japan, more than twice as much is spent on advertisements (per capita) than in Italy, Spain or Canada
(Table A1).
1
4. To understand the economic forces governing production and trade in this sector, it is
important to bear in mind that most advertising activities are ancillary business services.
Advertisements are not normally destined for consumption as such, but as stimulants promoting
demand for individual goods and services.  The structural changes affecting the advertising industry
are thus strongly influenced by developments in related product markets, including trends towardsincreased cross-border integration ("globalization").
                                                     
1 As a share of GDP, available estimates for advertising expenditure in the United States and the United
Kingdom range between 1.10 to 1.30 per cent, estimates for Germany, Spain, Sweden and Denmark between
0.80 and 1 per cent, and those for Belgium, France and Italy between 0.50 and 0.70 per cent (1994).  See
European Commission (1997), Panorama of EU Industries , Vol. 2, Luxembourg.
Of course, these figures tend to overstate the economic weight of the advertising sector – in terms of its
own contribution to GDP - as they include goods and services inputs provided by a wide range of relatedindustries (printed and audiovisual media, etc.).S/C/W/47
Page 2
5. In order to build and strengthen international brand identities for their products, multinational
companies tend to contract advertisers that are represented in all important markets.  In turn, this
implies that a growing portion of advertising expenditure is in the hands of large agencies with strong
international links and alliances.  Observers point out two main developments in the sector that have
ensued;  on the one hand, a general increase in the level of sectoral concentration and, on the other
hand, increasing polarization between small local agen cies and large international networks. In the
European Union, for example, a series of mergers and acquisitions over the past 15 years has led to
the emergence of four large international gr oups;  Publicis, Euro RSCG, Cordiant, and WWP. 2  The
world's 20 leading agencies - based mainly in the United States, the European Union and Japan - are
estimated to account for at least one quarter of global commercial advertising expenditure.  TableA2
provides an overview of the largest agencies in selected markets.
Box 1:  What are "Advertising Services"?
Advertising Services are listed in the Services Sectoral Classification List (document MTN.GNS/W/120),
which has been developed for scheduling purposes under the GATS, as a sub-category of "Other Business
Services".  The activities covered are defined through reference to group 871 of the UN provisional Central
Product Classification (CPC).  In turn, CPC 871 is made up of three sub-categories:
(i) Sale or leasing services of advertising space or time (services provided in soliciting advertising space
or time for newspapers, other periodicals, and television stations);
(ii) planning, creating and placement services of adve rtising (planning, creating and placement services of
advertisements to be displayed through the advertising media);  and
(iii) other advertising services (oth er advertising services not elsewhere classified, including outdoor and
aerial advertising services and delivery services of sample and other advertising material.
While Members are not legally bound to schedule in acco rdance with the Sectoral Classification List, a large
majority of the commitments made in the sector (see Section IV below) are in fact based on CPC 871.
However, the coverage of CPC 871 is subject to an element of uncertainty.  It is related to the composition of
audiovisual services in provisional CPC and, correspondingly, in the Sectoral Classification List.  Audiovisual
services are defined to include "Motion picture and video tape production and distribution services"
(CPC 9611). The latter group, in turn, embraces a sub-class CPC 96111, "Promotion or advertising services".
Unlike many other categories in provisional CPC, the content of this sub-class is not further defined, neither
directly nor through cross-reference to CPC 871.  Given the lack of further clarification, at least three
diverging interpretations are possible:  CPC 96111 is inte nded to cover activities rela ted to (i) production and
circulation of advertisements for audiovisual services;  (ii) broadcast of advertisements through  audiovisual
media;  and/or (iii) production of audiovisual advertisements, e.g. for TV commercials.  The potential for
interpretation problems is compounded by the fact that, while 51 Members have undertaken commitments on
"other business services/advertising services",  no more than 8  Members have committed on "promotion or
advertising services"  (CPC 96111).
A possible indication of what the authors of provisional CPC may have had in mind can be found in the draft
correspondence tables established by the editors of CPC version 1.  In these tables, the version 1-activity
(96121) deemed to correspond to provisional CPC 96111 – and, by implication, not to be captured by "other
business services/advertising services" – consists of "motion picture, video tape and television programme
production  services".
6. Strong international integration in the sector may have further benefited from the profession's
creativity and its flexibility in responding to, and capitalizing on, individual market trends.
Economies of scale and scope, production and network interdependencies – although significant
                                                     
2 European Commission, ed. (1997), The Single Market Review:  Impact on Services – Advertising ,
Luxembourg.S/C/W/47
Page 3
business parameters - appear to be less important for advertisers than, say, for suppliers of
telecommunication, insurance or transport services.
7. Developments in the media sector have been a further element of change.  While in the
United States and Japan, the use of individual media for advertising has remained relatively stable
over the past decade, deregulation of commercial television in Europe has had a major impact.  In the
U.S., the share of TV advertising increased from 31 to 35 per cent between 1980 and 1994 (in Japan:from 37 to 40 per cent), mainly at the expense of newspapers which fell from 43 to 39 per cent.  In
Europe, by contrast, the share of television expanded by no less than 14 percentage points to reach
32 per cent over the same period.
3   This expansion coincided with a rapid increase in the number of
national and cross-border television channels in the EU, up from 77 in 1988 to 129 in 1993.4  The
newly emerging stations, mainly satellite-based, are financed either through advertising or, possibly to
a lesser extent, subscription.
8. More recently, direct advertising through electronic channels has also been gaining in
importance, in turn benefiting from the deregulation of telecommunications.
II. REGULATORY STRUCTURE AND RESULTING TRADE EFFECTS
9. While the legal and institutional arrangements for foreign market participation differ widely -
subsidiaries, minority holdings, joint ventures or non-equity contractual links -, the preferred strategy
in many cases is based on wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries.  Leading international agenciessuch as McCann-Erickson, DDB or Needham maintain offices in over 70 countries (Table A3).
10. Apart from foreign equity ceilings and joint venture requirements indicated in several
Schedules of Commitments (Section III), the WTO Secretariat has found little information on policies
deliberately aimed at restricting foreign presence in the sector.
5   By the same token, there is hardly
any evidence of other measures, including subsidization, which governments may use to favourdomestic over foreign suppliers.  This is not really surprising as advertising services are not normally
among the sectors attracting particular policy attention in view, for example, of their perceived
infrastructural or developmental importance.  Yet Members may have additional information,
including on restrictions and disincentives operated by countries without commitments under the
GATS, to contribute to the Council discussion.
11. Available sources suggest that the industry is predominantly concerned about trade
impediments caused by domestic regulation, i.e. measures not normally covered by the Market Access
and National Treatment obligations under Articles  XVI and XVII of the GATS.  In many product
areas, advertisers are confronted with, and need to adjust to, country-specific regulations and market
conditions.  Regulatory diversity may lead to additional information and adjustment costs foradvertisers, compelling international agencies to depart in individual markets from their preferred
strategy and/or preventing them from using standa rd productions (newspaper ads, TV commercials,
etc.) in various countries.  Observers feel that the ensuing cost burden on the industry and its clients
                                                     
3 Source:  Panorama of EU Industry .
Estimates for 1998, taken from another source, put the share of TV advertising in the United States at
39 per cent and in Japan at 45.5 per cent.  The shar es for individual EU Member States vary between
24.6 per cent  in Germany and 54.8 per cent in Italy (Chart A1).
4 Source:  The Single Market Review.
5 It needs to be noted that in scheduling limitations in a particular sector, a WTO Member reserves the
right to operate the measures covered.  However, it is free at any time to provide for more liberal tradingconditions.S/C/W/47
Page 4
has grown significantly over the past decade, possibly reflecting an increasing policy focus of national
administrations on improving consumer protection.6
12. The advertising industry's proneness to regulation seems to result in particular from three
factors:
(a) reliance on media, including newspapers and television, whose advertising activities
may be subject to public control;  and, finally,
(b) direct regulatory restrictions intended to prevent false or deceptive claims, protect
public morals, etc.;  and, finally,
(c) strong focus on a range of consumer products deemed sensitive on health and safety
grounds such as pharmaceuticals, alcoholic beverages and tobacco products.  (In
these three areas, the average share of advertising expenditure normally exceeds
5 per cent of the sales price.)
13. A study on the effects of EU internal market integration in the sector distinguishes between
two main categories of measures:  on the one hand, direct measures intended to abolish national
barriers to cross-border advertising, harmonize regulatory conditions in the sector (e.g. throughcommon rules on misleading advertising) and establish EU legislation on media access (e.g. through
the Television without Frontiers Directive) and, on the other hand, indirect measures doing away with
remaining EU-internal barriers to goods and services trade.  Based on a business survey, the study
suggests that the main impact on the sector resulted from indirect measures, such as the more efficient
application of Community law, which has allowed users of advertising services increasingly to adopt
a genuine Pan-European approach.7  However, this result lends itself to two conflicting
interpretations:  the profession may generally consider indirect measures to be more important thandirect measures or they may feel that EU harmonization policies have been more successful to date in
the former area.  Yet it is worth noting in this co ntext that, overall,  the respondents viewed cultural
differences, language problems and differences in trade and distribution practices between the
Member States as more problematic than any (remaining) regulatory or administrative obstacles.
14. At the international level, nevertheless, industry associations have continued to voice concern
about a maze of regulatory restrictions (including advertising bans for certain financial, health and
legal services), stringent packaging and labelling requirements as well as unfavourable tax treatment.8
Countries may maintain diverging legislation, if any, on issues such as vocabulary and language;testimonials and endorsements;  comparative advertising;  content targeted at children;  and use of
cartoon characters, pornography and sexism.  Mainly for cultural policy reasons, some governmentshave also sought to influence media use through tax and other incentives.
9  The above survey for the
                                                     
6 The main exceptions seem to be Commonwealth countries which tend to rely at least as heavily on
self-regulation as on legislated constraints.
7 Source:  The Single Market Review .
8 For example, in countries that do not operate genera l sales taxes on all services, or are in the process
of introducing such taxes (e.g. India), advertising tends to be among the first services to be covered.
9 For example, under Canada's Income Tax Act, companies are allowed to deduct the cost of
advertisements in Canadian newspapers or periodicals circulated in Canada;  similar tax breaks exist foradvertisements broadcast on Canadian TV channels. (A Canadian newspaper is defined to be at least 75 per centCanadian-owned, with 80 per cent of the content differing from that of a periodical edited or published abroad.)
In addition, to discourage the importation of magazines, whose editorial content is considered identical to that of
foreign publication ("split-run editions"), Canada has operated an excise tax of 80 per cent on all advertisingrevenue of those magazines.  A ruling by the Appellate Body (WT/DS31/AB/R of 30 June 1997), whilereversing certain elements of a previous panel ruling, generally upheld the United States' claim that themeasures were inconsistent with Articles III.2  of GATT 1994.S/C/W/47
Page 5
EU internal market, carried out in 1996, also suggests that certain measures have defied full
harmonization in the Community to date.  Cases in point are the rules governing comparative
advertising which is reported to be banned in at  least two Member States (Belgium and Luxembourg)
while allowed in others, or Member States' flexible implementation of the Television without Frontier
Directive.  (The profession feels that, as a result, it is still not possible to conduct cross-border media
buying campaigns.)10  Moreover, although the Directive bans TV advertising and sponsorship for
tobacco products, a Commission proposal extendin g this ban to all other media has long been
awaiting Member States' approval.
15. The diversity of regulation in the sector may be considered a natural expression of national
sensitivities, value judgements and preferences.  The very concept of free consumer choice – implying
in turn the producers' right to advertise and strive for public attention – can thrive only if basic social
and moral values are respected.  And as these values vary across countries, scope and coverage of
advertising regulation will vary as well.
16. In addition, observers have pointed out legal and institutional factors which may also translate
into different regulatory strategies.  Producer liability legislation plays an important role in this
context.  It has been argued, in particular, that countries with stringent liability legislation tend to be
more "liberal" than others in controlling adver tising content.  The possibility for consumers or
competitors to seek compensation for damage caused by misleading information may prove aninteresting alternative, in terms of both complian ce costs and trade effects, to detailed legislation.
Questions remain, however.  For example, could a similar level of enforcement be ensured vis-à-vis
advertisers located abroad, and what measures would be taken if the costs of infringement, for
example of social or ethical norms, are largely intangible?
17. To address public concerns and, certainly, to ease pressure for further regulatory action, the
advertising industry - agencies and customers - has developed their own guidelines.  One of the first
examples dates from 1938, when the International Chamber of Commerce issued its Code of
Standards of Advertising Practice.
11 The codes and guidelines currently in place in many countries – a
recent publications describes 38 country cases – may serve either to fill legal voids, for example in
certain developing economies, or to complement existing government regulation.  The AdvertisingStandards Authority (UK), reportedly one of the world's leading self-regulatory bodies, processes
some 12,000 cases a year, based both on its own monitoring activities and its solicitation of
complaints.  Out of millions of advertisements, the Authority has requested about one thousand to be
modified or withdrawn.
12
18. While self-regulation may be less effective in ensuring compliance, it may prove, on the other
hand, a cheaper and faster instrument than formal legal action for complainants to express concern
and seek redress; Table 1 seeks to summarize main features of the two approaches.13
19. International policy initiatives concerning the advertising industry have been aimed
predominantly at reaffirming the individual countries' right to regulate within their jurisdiction. For
example, the Guidelines on Consumer Protection, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1985
(Res. 39/2488 of 9 April 1985) recognize the governments' right to regulate advertising, including
messages originating from abroad, and calls on enterprises to respect the rules of their host
                                                     
10 Source:  The Single Market Review.
11 The ICC Code of Advertising Practice addresses issues such as compliance with prevailing standards
of decency;  honesty; truthful presentation;  use of comparisons, testimonials and endorsements;  denigration;protection of privacy;  exploitation of goodwill;  imitation;  safety;  and content destined for children.
12 According to Boddewyn, Jean J. (1992), Global Perspectives on Advertising Self-Regulation ,
Westport, Connecticut.
13 Although some entries may prove controversial, in particular the positive assessment of certain
aspects of self-regulation, the Table has been repr oduced with a view to promoting discussion among
delegations on the pros and cons of alternativ e regulatory strategies.  See also Section IV.S/C/W/47
Page 6
countries.14  In addition, specialized UN agencies, in particular WHO and FAO, have issued
recommendations on how advertising of sensitive he alth and food products should be controlled.
Some international industry associations have also established sector-specific guidelines;  for
example, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers has issued ethical criteria for
advertising drugs.
Table 1:  Advertising Regulation versus Self-Regulation – Strengths and Weaknesses
Standards-related tasks Regulation Self-Regulation
Developing standards +  Greater sensitivity and faster
response to emerging public concerns-  Difficulty in responding to mattersof taste, opinion, etc.-  Difficulty in amending standards-  Greater lag in responding to
emerging concerns-  Ability to respond speedily in areasof taste, opinion, decency
Making standards known
and accepted+  Everybody is supposed to know thelaw-  Compulsion tends to generate
hostility and more evasion-  Public may not be aware of
standards and redress mechanisms+  Easier to encourage the industry's
adherence to letter and spirit of codes
Informing advertisers
about grey areas-  Not normally done by governments +  Increasingly done by associations
(even on a mandatory basis)
Monitoring compliance +/-  Routinely done, but often withlimited resources+/-  Increasingly done by the industry
(resource constraints)
Handling complaints +  Impartial treatment expected+  Many complaints can be handled-  Slower and more expensive-  Cannot put the burden of proofadvertisers in criminal cases-  Treatment more likely to be
perceived as partial-  Limited capability to handle manycomplaints  in some countries+  Faster and cheaper
+  Usually puts the burden of proof on
the incriminated advertiser
Penalizing infringements,
including  publicity+  Can force compliance-  Generates hostility, foot-dragging,appeals etc.-  Limited publicity of judgementsunless reported by the press-  Problems with non-compliers
+  Media normally refuse to publishincriminated ads or commercials+  More likely to obtain adherence tovoluntary standards
+  Greater publicity of wrongdoings
and (to a lesser  extent) of wrongdoers
Source: Boddewyn, Jean J. (1992), Global Perspectives on Advertising Self-Regulation , Westport, Connecticut
(editorial modifications  by WTO Secretariat).
III. CURRENT COMMITMENTS UNDER THE GATS
20. Advertising services have been committed by 51 WTO Members, counting the EU Member
Sates individually, which together represent slightly over 80 per cent of world merchandise trade.12
The commitments cover, with some variation in br eadth and depth, ten of the world's twelve largest
markets for advertisement (Table A1).
21. The majority of commitments in the sector, applying to 37 Members, are without
economically significant limitations on Market Access and National Treatment, except for Mode 4.
(This includes a few Members maintaining horizontal limitations on National Treatment, concerningfor example R&D subsidies, which do not seem to be economically relevant in this industry.)
15  Most
commitments cover the sector in full and do not exempt any specific market segments.  Where
exemptions have been made, these have not necessarily been motivated by trade policy
                                                     
14 According to Baudot, Barabara Sundberg (1990), International Advertising Handbook, Lexington.
15 One Member with full commitments for Market Access, Mode 3 ("none"), has nevertheless referred
to unspecified registration and licensing requirements.S/C/W/47
Page 7
considerations.  In a number of cases, they relate to advertisements for goods which may be
considered sensitive for health and safety reasons and/or have been made subject to import
authorization.   It is conceivable that other Members maintaining similar measures may have felt that
these are covered by Articles VI (domestic regulation) or XIV (health- and safety-related exceptions)
of the GATS and, thus, need not be scheduled.
22. Fourteen Members have scheduled Market Access and/or National Treatment limitations
under Modes 1 to 3, which may be deemed economically relevant;  they are reported in Table 2
below.  Eight limitations - mostly in the form of non-bindings - relate to cross-border trade or
consumption abroad and, as there is some over lap, an additional eight limitations to commercial
presence.  In six cases, the latter limitations are designed to provide cover for foreign equity ceilings
or for joint venture requirements;  with one exception, the relevant measures are sector-specific.
23. Under Mode 4, Members have generally referred to their horizontal limitations concerning the
movement of natural persons.  In addition, some EU Member States have included references toqualification requirements and the need for minimum periods of professional experience;  two EU
Members operate - or, rather, have reserved the right to operate - an economic needs test.
Table 2:  Commitments on Advertising Services (Modes 1, 2 and 3)
Developed Economies Developing and
Transition EconomiesTotal
Number of Schedules 23 28 51
Of these:
Limitations for Modes 1, 2 or 3
  (Foreign equity restrictions)-
(-)14
(5)14a
(5)
Commitments based on CPC
  (Coverage less than CPC 871 )b
No reference to CPC
  (Limited sectoral coverage)b22
(3)
1
(1)23
(9)
5
(2)45
(12)
6
(3)
Members concerned:  Argentina, Australia, Brazil*, Bulgaria, Burundi, Czech Republic, Dominican
Republic*, El Salvador*, Gambia*, Honduras*, Hong Kong*, Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Jamaica, Japan,
Republic of Korea, Kuwait*, Liechtenstein, Malaysia*, Mexico*, New Zealand, Norway, Panama*, Peru*,
Poland*, Switzerland, Sierra Leone*, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Thailand*, Turkey, United Arab
Emirates*, United States, Venezuela, and the 15 Member States of the European Union.
Members with partial commitments for Market Access or National Treatment are marked with an asterisk.
a Not including seven Schedules which, although free of limitations, are  limited in sectoral coverage.
b Members have exempted, for example, specified ad vertising activities (production of commercials for
radio and TV, skywriting) or advertising destin ed for "sensitive" products (tobacco, alcohols,
pharmaceuticals, etc.).
Source:  WTO Secretariat.
24. Except for Mode 4, the above observations suggest that some three-quarters of existing
specific commitments in the sector provide no room for further deepening.  As earlier indicated,
however, there may be scope for domestic policy initiatives to improve competitive conditions and,
thus, enhance business opportunities for both domestic and foreign advertisers.  Such initiatives may
include regulatory reforms aimed at enhancing th e industry's flexibility in complying with publicS/C/W/47
Page 8
policy objectives.  Institutional or organizational changes in "downstream" industries (media) are also
likely to affect the structure and, possibly, intensity of advertising activities.16
IV. THEMES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION
25. In completing this note, several themes have emerged which Members may find useful to
discuss further.  These include:
(a) Classification problems – is there a case for interpreting or modifying the current
definition of advertising services based on provisional CPC?
(b) Cross-sectoral effects of regulation – the impact of advertising restrictions (tobacco,
alcoholic beverages, etc.) and constraints on media use on the advertising industry.
- Consequences for future services negotiations:  Would it be helpful to discuss
cross-cutting regulatory issues for clusters of related sectors?
(c) Can industrial self-regulation obviate strict government legislation and control?  In
what areas?  What are the implications for trade and consumer policy?
(d) To what extent can general institutional arrangements (e.g. liability legislation) be
expected to substitute for  detailed regulatory control?  In what circumstances, with
what results?
(e) Scheduling practices:
- Constraints on  use of language and similar measures:  status under Articles II,
VI and XVII?
- Pros and cons of scheduling restrictions maintained on health and safety
grounds.
V. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS AND OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION
26. Advertisers, media and their clients have set up, and are represented by, various professional
associations at international, regional and national levels.  These organisations may be able, from their
perspective, to provide further information on challenges and constraints facing the profession;
several of them have issued own codes of advert ising standards. Identification of the competent
bodies may prove difficult in individual cases, however, as several associations may co-exist in the
same country or region.  Important contacts include:
International Advertising Association, 521 Fifth Avenue Suite 1807, New York NY 10175
(Tel. 212-557-1133) (Fax. 212-983-0455) (www.iaaglobal.org)
The IAA's 3,700 members are said to represent 99 per cent of the world's advertising
expenditure. The IAA is committed "to encourage adherence to codes of ethics andstandards of practice … which are consistent with those established by the
International Chamber of Commerce" (Section 2).  In 1980, the Association set up a
Public Action Committee "to serve as spokesman against unwarranted attack or
                                                     
16 Of course, any such policy changes can not be vi ewed exclusively from an economic perspective as
audiovisual and other media may be subject to a variety of social, educational and cultural policy objectives .S/C/W/47
Page 9
restrictions on advertising";  the Committ ee monitors "the international advertising
climate with regard to government regulation, legislation and consumerist action".
World Federation of Advertisers, Rue des Colonies 18-24, B-1000 Brussels (Tel. 32-2-
5025740).
Advertising Federation of Australia (AFA), 140 Arthur Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060.
American Advertising Federation, 1101 Vermont Ave. NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC
20005-6306.(Tel. (202) 898-0089).
Canadian Advertising Foundation (CAF), 350 Bl oor Street East, Toronto, Ontario M4W 1H5.
European Association of Advertising Agencies, Rue Saint-Quentin 5, B-1000 Brussels (Tel.
32-2-2801603).
Japan Advertising Agencies Association, 4-8-12 Ginza, Kochiwa Building, Tokyo.
27. Recent information on the sector, concerning both business and overall market developments,
are reported in Advertising Age International , a monthly publication with worldwide coverage
(http://adage.com/international).S/C/W/47
Page 10
ANNEX
Table A1:  The World's Twelve Largest Advertisement Markets, 1996/98
Total spending Country
1998 (forecast)  Growth  1998/97Expenditure
per capita (1996)
1. United Statesa$112.4 bn 6.0% $379.7
2. Japana$37.9 bn -21.2% $319.0
3. Germanya$22.3 bn -8.6% $257.9
4. United Kingdoma$18.9 bn 9.9% $284.2
5. Francea$10.6 bn 0.9% $174.5
6. Brazila$10.1 bn 23.2% $48.7
7. Italya$7.2 bn 16.1% $112.1
8. Spaina$5.2 bn 4.2% $122.4
9. Australiaa$5.1 bn 5.5% $255.4
10. Canada $4.9 bn 6.5% $147.4
11. China $4.8 bn -28.4% $2.1
12. Mexicoa$4.0 bn -19.6% $30.5
aCountries with full or partial commitments on advertising services under the GATS (see Section III).
Source: Advertising Age International , 11 May 1998;  WTO Secretariat.S/C/W/47
Page 11
Table A2:  The top five Advertising Agencies in Individual EU countries, Poland, South Africa
and Switzerland (1997)
(Gross income, US$ million)
FRANCE GERMANY ITALY
Euro RSCG France 275.8 BBDO Germany 201.0 Armando Testa
Group55.1
Publicis Conseil 176.6 Grey Gruppe
 Deutschland109.4 Barbella Gagliardi
Saffirio/DMB&B45.2
DDB France 143.5 Publicis 72.4 Young & Rubicam
Italia43.2
BDDP France 126.3 Ammirati Puris Lintas
Deutschland70.8 McCann-Erickson
Italia41.4
Ogilvy & Mather 69.3 Young & Rubicam 70.7 Saatchi & Saatchi 35.3
NETHERLANDS SPAIN UK
BBDO Nederland 45.0 Bassat, Ogilvy &
Mather41.1 J. Walther
Thompson London139.9
PMS & vW/Young &
 Rubicam37.1 McCann-Erickson Spain 37.3 Ogilvy & Mather 119.3
Publicis 30.4 Grey Espana 35.2 Saatchi & Saatchi
Group116.0
PPGH (JWT) 28.3 BBDO Espana 33.4 McCann-Erickson
UK112.5
Ogilvy & Mather 28.3 J. Walther Thompson
Madrid32.4 Young & Rubicam
UK108.5
POLAND  SOUTH AFRICA SWITZERLAND
ITI/McCann-Erickson
Poland79.2 O&M, Rightford 29.6 Advico Young &
Rubicam33.2
Ammirati Puris Lintas
Poland70.3 TBWA Hunt
Lascaris19.4 Wirz
Werbeberatung17.0
Saatchi & Saatchi Poland 56.5 Lindsay Smithers
/FCB12.7 McCann-Erickson
Switzerland15.7
JWT-Parintex Poland 56.6 Leo Burnett Group 11.9 Seiler DDB 15.6
Grey Warszawa 45.8 McCann-Erickson
South Africa9.7 Publicis 15.2
Source: Advertising Age International , 29 June 1998.S/C/W/47
Page 12
Table A3:  Multinational Agencies with Offices in more than 40 Countries (1994)
Advertising group Agency No of countries No of clients operating in
more than 10 countries
WWP Ogilvy & Mather
J. Walther Thompson61
6527
23
Omnicon BBDO
DDBNeedham63
747425
1616
Interpublic Lintas
Lowe GroupMcCann-Erickson49
549014
6
34
Cordiant Saatchi & Saatchi
Bates69
5722
19
Others Bozell
DMB & B
Leo BurnettEuro RSCGFCB PublicisGrey56
57
5047516718
8
13131436
Source: European Commission, ed. (1997), The Single Market Review – Impact on Services:
Advertising , Luxembourg.S/C/W/47
Page 13Chart A1:  Advertising Expenditure by Medium 
(1998 estimates)
020406080100
USA
Japan German
y
UK
Franc
e
Braz
il
Ital
y
Spai
n Au
straliaCanada
China
Mex
icoOthers
Radio
Magazines
Newspapers
TV
Source:  Advertising Age International , 11 May 1998.
__________