WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 68
IV. TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR
(1) OVERVIEW
1. Since the last El Salvador trade policy review, the importance of the manufacturing sector has
increased appreciably in terms of its contribution to GDP and foreign trade.  This is mainly due to the
expansion of the industries operating under special regimes such as free zones and outward processing
warehouses.  With the notable exception of some agro-industrial activities, El Salvador has made onlylimited use of trade policy measures as instruments of industrial policy and the level of tariff
protection accorded to the manufacturing sector is relatively low.
2. Although manufacturing may have grown more rapidly than agriculture, the agricultural
sector continues to be important in terms of its contribution to value added and national employment,
as well as in terms of its ability to generate foreign exchange.  The Government has defined a specificagricultural trade policy whose general objective is to create favourable conditions for Salvadoran
agricultural producers that help to make them more competitive and facilitate their integration into the
national production chains and the world market by ensuring an adequate domestic supply and
promoting their participation in the growth of exports .  To this end, it has undertaken a review of the
tariff structure for "sensitive" agricultural products, a review which by the end of 2002 had resulted inan increase in the tariffs applicable to imports of cheese, rice, white corn and pig meat.  The two main
agricultural exports, coffee and sugar, have been exposed to adverse market conditions, including a
collapse in international prices.
3. Since 1996, there have been considerable changes in the services sector, especially in the area
of telecommunications and financial services.  These have made possible significant advances in the
process of modernizing sectors of fundamental importance for national development.  At the same
time, the electrical sector has been extensively reformed to ensure the greater participation of theprivate sector and greater efficiency in the generation, distribution and marketing of electrical power.
With respect to multilateral commitments, El Salv ador has participated in the negotiations on
financial services as well as in the GATS negotiations on basic telecommunications and has accepted
both protocols.
(2) 
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
(i) Market structure and results
4. The economic importance of the agricultural sector has declined since the last El Salvador
trade policy review, although the sector continues to exert considerable influence in terms of
contribution to value added and national employment .  The sector's contribution (including hunting,
forestry and fishing) to total GDP fell from 13.5% in 1996 to 12.3% in 2001.  This contribution risesto more than 20% if the agro-industrial sector (food, beverages and tobacco) is included (Table IV.1).
The importance of the agricultural sector for El Salvador's social development is reflected in the fact
that the rural population accounts for more than 40% of the total population and more than 35% of the
labour force; moreover, the highest concentration of poverty-stricken households is to be found in the
rural areas.
1
5. According to the Salvadoran Foundation for Economic and Social Development (FUSADES),
the loss of dynamism in the agricultural sector during the second half of the nineties can be attributed
                                                     
1 FUSADES (2001), The State of our Economy: 2000-2001 , Department of Economic and Social
Studies.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 69
to a number of factors and in particular to adverse weather conditions, low levels of productivity
(especially in the case of sugar and basic grains), insufficient business training and poor
infrastructure.  FUSADES also mentions the lack of a legal and institutional framework for promoting
and protecting free competition, as well as the deterioration of the environment.  With respect to the
environmental problems that the country is experiencing, it should be noted that in 1998 the
Legislative Assembly adopted an Environment Law (Decree No. 233 of 2 March 1998, published inOfficial Journal No. 79, Volume 339 of 4 May 1998) intended to ensure the protection, conservation
and recovery of the environment and the sustainable use of natural resources, as well as to regulate
environmental management, both public and private.  A year before the Law was adopted, the
Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources was set up and made responsible for monitoring
compliance with the environmental protection legislation in El Salvador.
Table IV.1
Contribution of the agricultural and agro-industrial sector to GDP, 1996-2000a
(%)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing 13.51 13.01 12.45 12.96 12.28
Coffee, “oro” 3.13 2.81 2.48 2.77 2.31
Basic grains 2.71 2.48 2.2 2.53 2.27
Sugar cane 0.61 0.73 0.81 0.76 0.73
Other agricultural products 2.29 2.25 2.21 2.2 2.19
Livestock farming 2.16 2.24 2.2 2.18 2.18
Poultry farming 1.37 1.39 1.45 1.51 1.59
Forestry 0.76 0.74 0.71 0.7 0.69
Hunting and fishery products 0.48 0.36 0.39 0.31 0.29
Agro-industrya8.01 8.16 7.96 7.99 8.17
a Includes the food industry (meat and meat products, dairy products, processed fish products, milling and bakery products, suga r,
other processed food products, beverages, processed tobacco).
Data at constant prices.
Source : Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador.
6. Between 1996 and 2001, on average, the area rese rved for growing the main crops (coffee,
sugar cane and basic grains) amounted to some 710,000 hectares;  however, this area fluctuated
sharply reaching a peak of some 762,000 hectares in 1997 and a minimum of barely 678,000 hectares
in 2000.  The two main crops in terms of cultivated area are maize and coffee;  whereas the areaplanted with maize fluctuated considerably during the period under review, the area planted with
coffee remained more or less constant.  In this connection, the authorities have noted that in
El Salvador there are no legal or de facto  restrictions to prevent the coffee-growing areas from being
expanded or reduced.  Apart from maize, the main crops for domestic consumption are sorghum and
beans;  for these two products the cultivated area (and production) have followed opposing trends.Whereas the area planted with beans has increased by more than 25%, that planted with sorghum has
receded by a little over 18%.  Likewise, the indicators for rice point to a considerable contraction, in
terms of both cultivated area and production, over the last two years.  During the same period, the
figures for the main fruit crops remained relatively constant (Table IV.2).WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 70
Table IV.2
Main crop production indicators, 1996-2001
(Thousands of hectares and tonnes)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Traditional
Green coffee
Cultivated area 163.9 164.2 162.0 162.1 162.2 162.2
Production 148.9 124.2 117.2 160.8 114.1 112.2
Cane sugar
Cultivated area 55.8 69.9 74.9 77.1 75.3 64.4
Production 4.908.5 5.169.9 4.966.2 5.306.6 5.071.2 4.589.5
Basic grains
Maize
Cultivated area 279.1 306.1 295.4 263.4 259.3 294.1
Production 630.0 507.7 563.1 659.8 583.0 565.0
Sorghum
Cultivated area 119.4 124.4 109.3 106.4 93.9 97.5
Production 182.0 199.7 168.6 139.5 149.0 148.8
Beans
Cultivated area 67.7 83.0 78.1 74.4 79.0 85.2
Production 59.1 67.5 46.6 66.5 68.2 74.1
Rice
Cultivated area 10.7 14.9 10.3 10.9 8.2 6.3
Production 55.3 66.1 51.4 57.4 47.2 37.3
Fruit
Bananas
Cultivated area 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.0 6.0
Production 40.9 70.0 70.0 70.0 65.0 65.0
Oranges
Cultivated area 4.9 5.6 5.1 4.9 5.2 5.2
Production 33.0 36.3 26.1 37.0 37.3 37.3
Avocados
Cultivated area 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.0
Production 41.5 42.0 42.5 42.5 40.0 40.0
Lemons
Cultivated area 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8
Production 23.5 23.5 23.5 24.0 25.0 25.0
Mangoes
Cultivated area 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.5
Production 17.9 17.9 17.9 18.0 17.5 17.5
Source : WTO Secretariat, based on  FAOSTAT data.
(a) Coffee
7. Up to the year 2000, coffee’s contribution to El Salvador’s agricultural value added was about
20% and its contribution to total merchandise exports about 10% (Table IV.3).  The coffee sector has
traditionally been one of the principal generators of jobs in El Salvador’s rural areas:  during the
nineties, the sector employed, on average, 155,000 people each year, about 17% of the rural labourEl Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 71
force.  Accordingly, the crisis through which the sector has been passing since 1997 has had a
considerable economic and social impact on the rural areas of the country.  During this period,
Salvadoran producers have not only suffered losses due to various natural phenomena, including the
earthquakes which shook the country at the beginning of 2001 and which cost the sector more than
US$600 million, but have also had to confront a collapse in prices on the world market to levels of
less than 50 dollars per quintal (one quintal is equal to 45 kg).2
Table IV.3
Volume and value of coffee and sugar exports, 1996-2000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001a
Coffee
Volume (thousands of tonnes) 138.2 166.4 101.5 113.9 150.4 92.1
Value (millions of US$)) 339.0 520.5 323.7 245.1 297.9 115.1
% of total exports 19.0 21.5 13.3 9.8 10.1 4.0
Sugar
Volume (thousands of tonnes) 97.6 174 245.5 219.3 256.5 310.4
Value (millions of US$) 36.6 56.1 67 46.5 39.9 70
% of total exports 2.0 2.3 2.7 1.9 1.4 2.4
a Preliminary figures.
Source : WTO Secretariat, based on figures published by the Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador.
8. According to a study by the Salvadoran Coffee Council ( Consejo Salvadoreño del Café ),
during the last four years the trend in coffee prices has reflected the surplus in world supply relative to
consumption.3  In particular, the study mentions the entry into the world market of Vietnam, a country
which increased its share of the global supply from 4% in 1995 to 13% in 2001, as well as the sharpincrease in the productive capacity of Brazil in recent years, as two of the factors that have
contributed to the sharp growth in world supply.
9. In the case of El Salvador, the fall in coffee prices has been translated into significant
decreases production, which declined from an average of 3.1 million quintals of " ora-uva " in the
nineties to 2.4 million during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 seasons.  In terms of the incomegenerated by coffee exports in the five-year period 1994-1998, during the period 1999-2001
El Salvador lost on average US$138 million a year.
10. According to the estimates of PROCAFE and the Salvadoran Coffee Council, for the
2000-2001 season the losses of the Salvadoran coffee producers amounted on average to 12 dollars
per quintal.
4  The fall in prices had the greatest impact on the profitability of the cooperatives and
micro-producers (those with less than seven hectares under cultivation).  Faced with this drastic
decline in profitability, the producers have been  reducing their investment in inputs for the
maintenance of the coffee plantations, sowing and re-sowing, pest control and fertilization, so that
during the 2000-2001 season investment in each of these activities fell by between 26 and 90%
relative to the average for the period 1995-1999.  If this trend continues, it will have an adverse
                                                     
2 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLA) (April 2002), Central America:
The impact of the fall in coffee prices  (Mexico-United Nations).
3 Salvadoran Coffee Council, The Coffee Market in 2002 (copy supplied by the authorities), undated.
4 Estimates cited in ECLA (2002).WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 72
impact on the future productivity of the Salvadoran coffee plantations.  The current crisis has also
affected other activities linked with coffee, particularly transport.
11. The abandonment of numerous plantations as a result of the crisis in the sector has led to a
considerable increase in unemployment in the countryside and a reduction in the income of many
rural workers, whose numbers fell to 96,000 in the 2001-2002 season.  It is estimated that in 2002-
2003 the demand for labour will fall by an additional 35%.  According to UNICEF, as a result of thegrowing unemployment and the lack of alternative so urces of income for many of the families that
depend on coffee, in some municipalities up to 80% of the children are suffering from malnutrition.
5
12. In response to the crisis in the sector, in July 2001 the Government established the
Environmental Trust for the Conservation of the Coffee Forest ( Fideicomiso ambiental para la
conservación del bosque cafetalero  - FICAFE), to which the coffee debt portfolios of seven banks
have been transferred.  At the same time, the sector's 20-year credit was restructured and the farmers
were granted loans partially guaranteed by the Government.  Although these measures are bringing
short-term relief, given the high levels of indebtedness in the sector (about 3,540 dollars per worker),
in the medium and long-term the survival of many coffee-growers will depend on the trend in world
prices and their ability to develop products that earn them higher profit margins in internationalmarkets.
13. Recognizing this, the Government has been pr omoting the cultivation of specialty (gourmet
and organic) coffees by granting a subsidy equivalent to 6% of the total value of exports
(Chapter III.3 (vi)).  In recent years there has been an extraordinary increase in the demand for these
coffees in the mature markets (mainly the United States and the European Union).  Nevertheless, even
though coffees already grown in El Salvador predom inate in the specialty coffee blend, at present
exports of gourmet and organic coffees amount to less than 2% of total Salvadoran coffee exports.
(b) Sugar
14. In volume terms, sugar production has fluctuated considerably since 1996.  After recording an
increase of almost 7% in 1999, production fell by mo re than 30% in the two following years, reaching
its lowest level since 1996 (Table IV.2).  Meanwhile, there was a clear upward trend in the volume of
sugar for export.  This rose from less than 100,000 tonnes in 1996 to more than 310,000 tonnes in2001 (Table IV.3).
15. The sugar sector benefits from a high level of protection with nominal tariffs of 40%.
According to a study published by the Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador (BCR), the level of
protection is even higher because "in order to import sugar it is necessary to obtain the approval of the
Ministry of the Economy which is only granted if it considers sugar to be in 'short supply'".
6  The
Member countries of the CACM apply a technical standard which requires sugar for the domestic
market to be fortified with vitamin A, as a means of counteracting malnutrition, especially among
children (Chapter III.2 (x)).
16. At the end of the year 2000, the sector found itself faced with a series of difficulties including,
in particular, according to FUSADES, a fall in  the world price of the product and non-compliance
                                                     
5 United Nations Radio, “Cases of child malnutrition in El Salvador increasing because of the coffee
crisis”, 22 October 2002, available at www.un.org/spanish/news/audiovis/radio/02/oct/02102200.htm.
6 Lazo, Carmen A. and Manuel Sánchez Masferrer, The protection of the sugar market in El Salvador,”
in Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador, Economic Bulletin 145, July-August 2001.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 73
with domestic sales quotas on the part of one mill, which helped to depress the domestic price.7  In
response to this situation, Parliament passed the El Salvador Sugar Agro-Industry Production,
Industrialization and Marketing Law, promulgated in Legislative Decree No. 490, published in the
Official Journal, Volume 352 of 17 August 2001.  The purpose of this law is to regulate the relations
between sugar mills and between the latter and the sugar cane producers.   Accordingly, it authorizes
the Ministers of the Economy and Agriculture to establish maximum domestic sugar and honey priceson the basis of a technical, economic and social analysis.
17. The Sugar Agro-Industry Production, Industrialization and Marketing Law also set up a
Salvadoran Sugar Agro-Industry Council ( Consejo Salvadoreño de la Agroindustria Azucarera )
composed of the Ministers of the Economy and Agriculture, three representatives of the sugar mills
and three representatives of the producers' associations.  On the basis of each mill's historical share ofsugar production and estimates of the domestic and foreign demand, the Council allocates the amount
of sugar that can be sold each year by each of the mills on the domestic and preferential markets.  The
law does not provide for the allocation of quotas to foreign sugar producers for supplying the
domestic market.
18. At the same time, the process of privatization which began with the entry into force of the
1994 Law on the Privatization of Distilleries has been considerably extended.  The Privatization Law
granted credit facilities to enable workers and cane growers linked to the distilleries to purchase
shares in the latter.  However, the workers who benefited from these credits were unable to fulfil their
obligations within the time limits laid down by the Privatization Law.
8  In view of this situation, on
29 July 2002, the Legislative Assembly adopted Decr ee No. 928 enabling the Salvadoran Investment
Corporation ( Corporación Salvadoreña de Inversiones , CORSAIN), the entity to which the accounts
payable in connection with the privatization of the distilleries had been transferred, to offer the
debtors new payment options.
(ii) Policy objectives and instruments
19. Within the framework of the agricultural policy formulated for the period 1999-2004, the
Ministry of the Economy, in close coordination wi th the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock
(MAG), has defined an agricultural trade policy whose general objective is to provide favourableconditions for Salvadoran agricultural producers that help to make them more competitive and
facilitate their integration into the national productive chains and the world market, by ensuring an
adequate domestic supply and promoting their participation in the growth of exports.  According to
the authorities, the interests of the consumers are al so being taken into account in formulating specific
measures within the context of agricultural trade policy.
20. For the purpose of achieving the general objective of agricultural trade policy, at the end of
2002, the tariffs applicable to "sensitive" agricultural products were being reviewed.  "Sensitive"
products are those "with unstable and distorted international markets important for the creation of
agricultural jobs and value added".
9  This exercise has resulted in increases in the tariffs applied to
                                                     
7 FUSADES (2001), The State of our Economy: 2000-2001 , Department of Economic and Social
Studies.
8 See recital IV of Legislative Decree No. 928, of 29 July 2000, and recital II of Legislative Decree
No. 674, of 28 July 1999.
9 Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock of El Salvador, Agricultural Policy and National Agrarian
Management 1999-2004 , San Salvador, 4 May 2000.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 74
imports of cheese, rice, white maize and pig meat.  The authorities have pointed out that, with the
exception of pig meat, the increase in the tariffs on these products is also subject to the process of
tariff harmonization initiated in connection with the establishment of a customs union between
El Salvador and Guatemala.
21. The Government has established an Interministerial Agricultural Trade Commission
(Comisión Interministerial de Comercio Agropecuario ) composed of representatives of the Ministries
of the Economy, Agriculture and Livestock, and Finance.  One of the main tasks of this Commission
is to guide and advise agricultural producers on matters relating to trade, tariff, fiscal and agricultural
health policy, as well as on any other matter of interest that requires technical recommendations for
decision-making at ministerial or presidential level.  For its part, the MAG, in collaboration with the
Ministry of Finance, has implemented the International Agricultural Product Price InformationSystem ( Sistema de Información de Precios Internacionales de Productos Agropecuarios ).  Through
this system the MAG regularly transmits to the Directorate-General of Customs Revenue ( Dirección
General de la Renta de Aduanas , DGRA) a list of "ordinary competitive prices" for imports, so that
the DGRA can detect possible underinvoicing or undervaluation.  In addition, it has set up a
Consultative Commission on the Management of Donations ( Comisión Consultiva sobre el Manejo de
Donaciones ) which analyses and approves any food donations and agricultural inputs that the country
may receive with a view to preventing distortions of the local market due to the entry of these
products.  A Technical Quotas Commission ( Comisión Técnica de Contingentes ), which specializes in
making recommendations on the opening and administration of quotas, has also been established.
22. Agricultural trade policy also includes measures to improve market access for Salvadoran
agricultural products.  To this end, the MAG provid es support for the efforts of the Ministry of the
Economy in negotiating trade treaties.  In addition, several of the specific programmes administeredby the MAG as part of the scheme Agricultural  Policy and National Agricultural Management 1999-
2004 are intended to acquire a larger share of the international market for Salvadoran agricultural
products.  At the end of 2002, there were specific programmes in such areas as research and
technology transfer, promotion of agri-business development, development of the physical support
infrastructure for productive activities, agricultural education, agricultural health and security oftenure.
23. As far as financing is concerned, in addition to the loans offered by the banks of the national
financial system and under the programmes described in Chapter III (Section (4) (v)), the agricultural
and agro-industrial sector has access to public resources channelled through special funds.  These
funds include the Environmental Loan Fund ( Fondo de Crédito para el Medio Ambiente , FOCAM),
which has about 20 million dollars available for promoting productive environmental conservation
activities and the Special Agricultural Development Trust ( Fideicomiso Especial de Desarrollo
Agropecuario , FEDA), whose resources of approximately 45 million dollars are intended for
financing investment in medium- and long-term research into various agricultural activities.  Both
programmes offer preferential terms for users.  The Government has pointed out that the guidelinesfor granting loans under these programmes are bein g reviewed in order to make the funds more
accessible.  At the same time, the Government is continuing to support the agricultural sector through
funds for refinancing the debts of those affected by natural phenomena, such as the Agricultural
Sector Finance Fund ( Fondo de Financiamiento para el Sector Agropecuario , FINSAGRO), whose
resources amount to 34 million dollars.
(iii) Support indicators
24. El Salvador's notifications to the Committee on Agriculture indicate that since 1997 no export
subsidy has been granted and no domestic support measure in favour of agricultural products has beenEl Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 75
introduced.10  The tariff protection granted to agricultural products (defined on the basis of Annex I of
the WTO Agreement on Agriculture) continues to be appreciably greater than that granted to
industrial products (Chapter III.2 (iii)).  However, there are no indicators, such as, for example, PSE
estimates, that would make it possible to assess the net global impact, on the sector and on specific
products, of the various protection and promotion measures.
25. Public expenditure on the agricultural sector has remained relatively constant in nominal
terms since the last El Salvador trade policy review.  However, as a proportion of total public sector
expenditure, public expenditure on agriculture has displayed a clear downward trend, falling from
2.5% of total public expenditure in 1996 to about 2% in 2000 (without taking into account the transfer
of US$47 million from the MAG to the Agricultural Development Bank in 2000 to strengthen the
latter's position).  According to the information provided by the authorities for the period 1996-2000,
out of the US$20 million disbursed on average each y ear for the benefit of the agricultural sector 70%
was for productive development, which includes the development of irrigation and drainage systems,
market improvement and development, and institutional reform programmes to encourage good
management, innovation, environmental regeneration and sustainable agriculture.
(3) MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
26. Since last El Salvador trade policy review, the manufacturing sector has performed strongly,
growing on average at rates higher than those for total GDP.  As a result, the manufacturing sector's
contribution to the economy has increased significantly, rising from 21.5% of GDP in 1996 to 23.5%
in 2001.  In terms of employment, the manufacturing sector employs 17.4% of the labour force.
Moreover, the sector has played an important role as a generator of foreign exchange, especially the
maquila  industry which in 2001 generated exports worth more than US$1,650 million (equivalent to
57.6% of the total value of Salvadoran exports).  However, the value of net maquila  industry exports
was much lower, about US$490 million, since the industry's imports increased to a little over
US$1,160 million.
27. On average, during the period 1997-2001, the items making the greatest contribution to
manufacturing production were as follows: basic and processed chemicals with 9.8% of
manufacturing GDP; milling and bakery products (9 .8%); beverages (9.7%); sugar (7.9%); other
processed food products (7.1%); and textiles and made-up textile articles (6.9%).11  At the same time,
the most dynamic branches were the rubber and plastics industry, with an average annual growth rate
of 9.2% between 1997 and 2001; transport equipment and miscellaneous manufactures (7.6%); paper,
board and paper and board products (6.4%); basic and processed metal products (6.2%); and the
beverage industry (6.1%) (Table IV.4).
                                                     
10 WTO documents G/AG/N/SLV/13 and G/AG/N/SLV/14, of 20 August 2002.
11 The manufacturing GDP figure used to calculate the weight of these sectors does not include
industrial maquila  services.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 76
Table IV.4
Breakdown of industrial sector value added, 1996-2001
(%)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Manufacturing industry (% of total GDP) 21.0 21.0 21.4 22.6 23.1 23.0
Food products 26.5 26.8 27.9 27.5 26.7 26.4
Beverages 7.6 7.7 6.8 6.7 6.5 9.0
Tobacco, processed 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Textiles and made-up textile articles (exc. clothing) 6.2 6.7 6.8 7.4 6.6 5.8
Clothing 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.7 1.8
Leather and leather products 4.9 4.3 5.0 4.2 4.0 3.7
Wood and wood products 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.2
Paper, board and products thereof 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 2.7
Products of the printing and allied industries 5.4 5.6 5.2 4.8 4.9 4.5
Basic and processed chemicals 7.3 6.5 7.6 8.1 7.3 8.5
Products of oil refining 6.7 6.1 5.4 6.1 7.1 5.0
Rubber and plastics products 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.7
Processed non-metallic mineral products 3.8 4.0 4.4 4.0 3.8 4.3
Basic and processed metal products 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.7 4.7
Machinery, equipment and supplies 4.4 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.1
Transport equipment and miscellaneous manufactures 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.5 5.0 3.5
Industrial maquila  services 6.3 8.0 8.1 8.6 9.9 13.3
Source : Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
28. In 2000, the main products exported by non- maquila  manufacturing industry were:  chemical
products (medicaments and cleaning products);  te xtile products (underwear, clothing, bed, table and
kitchen linen, cotton yarn);  metal products (rolled iron and steel products and manufactured
aluminium goods);  and electrical machinery and equipment.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 77
Chart IV.1
Tariff protection in the industrial sector, 2002a
(%)
0510152025303540
Average
9%
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
31 Manufacture of food products, beverages and tob acco
32 Textile, clothing and leather industries
33 Wood and wood products industry, including furniture
34 Manufacture of paper and paper products;  printing and publishing35 Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products derived from petroleum and carbon, rubber and
plastics
36 Manufacture of non-metallic mineral products, except for petroleum and carbon derivatives
37 Basic Metal Industries37 Manufacture of metal products, machinery and equipment38 Other manufacturing industry
a By 4-digit ISIC heading.
Source: WTO Secretariat estimates based on data supplied by the Salvadoran authorities.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 78
29. El Salvador has made only limited use of trade policy measures as instruments of industrial
policy, with the notable exception of some agro-industrial activities and the use of special export
procedures (Chapter III(3)(vi) and (vii)).  The level of tariff protection accorded to the industrial
sector is relatively low;  in 2002 the average tariff in the manufacturing sector amounted to 7.5%
(estimate based on the ISIC classification).12  However, some industrial activities continue to benefit
from levels of tariff protection much higher than the sector average.  In addition to some branches of
the food industry (ISIC 31), the textile, clothing a nd leather industry (ISIC 32) and the wood industry
continue to enjoy a level of tariff protection above the average for the manufacturing sector
(Chart IV(1)).  Other industrial sector promotion measures include support programmes for research
(Chapter III(4)(vi)) and various specific financing programmes generally focussed on small andmedium-sized enterprises (Chapter III(4)(v)).
30. Moreover, Salvadoran industry as a whole, and especially the textile and clothing maquila
industry, benefits from preferential access conditions under various unilateral concession
arrangements such as the Generalized System of Preferences and the Caribbean Basin Initiative
(Chapter III(3)(x) and Chapter II(4)(iii)).
31. There has been a considerable increase in the part played by the maquila  industry in the
national economy.  Sector exports rose from US$646.6 million in 1995 to 1,651.6 million in 2001, a
figure equivalent to slightly more than 57% of total Salvadoran exports for that year.  Another
development that reflects the dynamism of this sector is the marked increase in the number of free
zones, which totaled 15 in July 2002 and occupied about 595,000 square metres of industrial floor
space, more than twice the figure for 1996.
32. El Salvador’s maquila  industry specializes in the assembly of clothing.  In 2001,
approximately 95% of exports from the country’s free zones were items of clothing and made-up
textile articles, while the remaining 5% consisted mainly of electronic products, although
refrigerators, cookers, sewing machines and plastic sheeting were also exported.
13  The experience of
other countries suggests that the concentration of maquila  production on textiles and clothing is
hampering the establishment of links between the free zones and Salvadoran enterprises, which isresulting in low levels of local value added.
14  The exports of the Salvadoran maquila  sector are
highly concentrated not only in terms of production but also with respect to their geographical
destination, since almost all the sector’s exports are destined for the United States.
33. As the authorities have pointed out, one of the main benefits to be derived from the free zones
has been job creation.  In 2001, the free zones employed 81,220 workers, almost 20% of totalmanufacturing industry employment.  Moreover, almost another 38% of manufacturing jobs in
El Salvador are indirectly related with the free zones.
                                                     
12 According to the WTO definition of agricultural products, the average tariff for the non-agricultural
sector is 6.7%.
13 BCR (2002), Quarterly Review, January-March.
14 Jenkins, Mauricio;  Gerardo Esquivel and Felipe Larraín B.  (1998), "Export Processing Zones in
Central America," Development Discussion Paper  No. 646, Harvard Institute for International Development,
August.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 79
(4) ELECTRICAL SECTOR
34. It is estimated that the contribution of the electrical sector to GDP is 0.6%.  Until the middle
of the nineties, the Salvadoran electrical sector was dominated by a single State enterprise, the Rio
Lempa Hydroelectric Executive Commission ( Comisión Ejecutiva Hidroeléctrica del Río Lempa ,
CL).  In 1996, new laws were approved.  This led to the restructuring of the industry and the breakup
and partial privatization of this public enterprise.  The new legislative framework for the electricalsector includes the following laws and regulations: the General Electricity Law (Legislative Decree
No. 843 of 21 October 1996, published in Official  Journal No. 201 of 25 October 1996); its
Regulations (Executive Order No. 70 of 25 July 1997); the Law establishing the General
Superintendency for Electricity and Telecommunications (SIGET) (Legislative Decree No. 808 of
12 September 1996, published in Official Journal No. 189 of 9 October 1996); the Regulationsapplicable to electrical energy marketing activities (Executive Decree No. 90, 1 November 2000);
SIGET's standards and decisions; the Regulations of the Transactions Unit ( Unidad de Transacciones )
and the Regulations for the Operation of the Transmission System and the Wholesale Market, SIGET
Decision No. E-13-99 of 19 July 1999, published in Official Journal No. 138 of 23 July 1999.
35. This legislative framework provides for the separation of the electrical industry into four parts
(generation, transmission, distribution and marketing), the introduction of competition into the power
generation and heavy consumption market (wholesale electricity market or WEM), and competition at
the retail level through the action of marketers.  Sector policies are formulated by the Electrical
Energy Directorate of the Ministry of the Economy.  SIGET is responsible for monitoring compliance
with the provisions of international treaties on electricity and telecommunications and the laws that
regulate these sectors.  In particular, SIGET's responsibilities include: reviewing the terms, conditions
and maximum prices of the tariff schedules applicable to the end user; establishing technical standardsfor the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity; examining the granting of concessions
for the exploitation of hydroelectric and geothermal resources; issuing technical standards applicable
to the sectors under its supervision; carrying out technical audits of the generation, transmission and
distribution systems; and promoting competition.
36. Generation and distribution are open to private investment.  To generate electrical energy
from hydroelectric and geothermal resources it is necessary to obtain a concession from SIGET.  The
General Electricity Law places no limitations on the nationality or nature of the concessionaires who
may therefore be foreign private investors.  No concession is required for generation using other
resources or for transmission, distribution and marketing activities; the enterprises merely have to be
registered in SIGET's Register of Electricity Sector Operators.  Transmission is currently a monopolyoperated by the State-owned Empresa Transmisora de El Salvador .  The private sector plays a part in
marketing, which, however, is mainly concentrated in the hands of the State.
37. At the end of 2002, the Salvadoran electrical industry had: thirteen generating enterprises; one
enterprise devoted to transmission; five distribution enterprises; four marketers of electricity; and
three heavy consumers in the WEM.  Moreover, the sector included one independent private entity,the Transactions Unit (UT) responsible for coordinating and operating the WEM.  Its shareholders are
all operators (involved in generation, transmission or distribution) and end users participating directly
in the WEM.  At the end of 2002, four generators, the transmission company, four distribution
operators and two end users were participating in the UT.
38. Each of the distributors covers a geographical area but none of them has an exclusive supply
concession.  Of the five distributors (CAESS, DELSUR, AESCLESA, EEO and DEUSEM) four were
privatized in 1998 with the participation of Venezuelan, Chilean and United States capital; DEUSEMwas privatized at a later date.  The distributors are also exporters and importers of electricity.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 80
39. In 2001, total electrical energy production on the wholesale market was 3,647 GWh, of which
31% was generated by public enterprises and 69% by private generating companies; the net demand
for electrical energy amounted to 3,956 GWh, which exceeded domestic production, the national
supply being supplemented with imports from Guat emala equivalent to 309 GWh (Table IV.5).  In
terms of installed capacity, that same year, the private enterprises (exclusively thermal generation)
exceeded the installed capacity of the public enterprises (hydroelectric and geothermal generation),bringing total installed capacity to 1,118 MW distributed as follows: thermal generation 50%;
hydroelectric generation 36%; and geothermal generation 14%.
Table IV.5
Main indicators for the electrical sector, 1994-2002
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002a
Installed capacity (MW) b818 909 943 943 943 988 1,101 1,118 1,133
Public (%) 100 90 85 85 85 54 50 50 51
Private (%) 0 10 15 15 15 46 50 50 49
Maximum demand (MW) 566 592 626 666 694 718 758 734 748
Net demand for energyc (GWh) 3,064 3,236 3,361 3,636 3,775 3,889 4,074 3,956 1,942
Production (GWh) 3,075 3,271 3,340 3,548 3,737 3,638 3,377 3,647 1,811
Public (%) 100 94 80 74 75 64 56 31 31
P r i v a t e  ( % ) 0 62 0 2 62 52 7 4 46 96 9
Net importsd (GWh) -11 -35 21 88 38 250 696 309 131
Average price, residential sector (US$/kWh) 0.070 0.072 0.080 0.081 0.123 0.116 0.126 0.134 0.132
a On 30 June.
bW h o l e s a l e  m a r k e t .
c Sum of local production and net imports of electrical energy.
d Negative net imports represent exports to neighbouring countries.
Source : Information provided by the Salvadoran authorities.
40. With regard to generation per operator in the WEM, in 2001 the State enterprise CL covered
29% of the demand, followed by the enterprises Gesal (with Italian capital) and Nejapa (United States
capital) with 23 percent each, Duke (regional private enterprise) with 16%, and the Salvadoran
cement producer CESSA with 1%.  With respect to  hydroelectric and geothermal energy there are
only two generators in operation: the former State monopoly CL, which controls most of the
production, and the Salvadoran enterprise Geotérmica Salvadoreña, S.A.  de C.V .  However, in
October 2002, concessions were granted to four other private enterprises which are not yet in
operation.
41. El Salvador is participating in the SIEPAC Project (Electrical Interconnection System for
Central America) which involves the establishment and implementation of a Central American
wholesale electricity market and the development of the first regional transmission system.El Salvador, together with Guatemala, Honduras,  Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama, have approved
and ratified the Framework Treaty on the Central American Electricity Market, signed in
December 1996 and in force since January 1999, which is aimed at the establishment of a Regional
Electricity Market (REM).  The Framework Treaty opened up the national markets to the regional
market for the transmission and buying and selling of electricity and created a Regional Electrical
Interconnection Commission ( Comisión Regional de Interconexión Eléctrica , CRIE), responsible for
ensuring the implementation of the principles of the Framework Treaty and subsequent regulations,and a Regional Operating Body ( Ente Operador Regional , EOR), responsible for the technical
operation and commercial aspects of the regional market.  Both these entities were formally set up in
2000; in October 2002, it was decided that the EOR's permanent headquarters should be in
El Salvador and those of the CRIE in Guatemala.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 81
42. The Framework Treaty grants a concessi on for the network-owning enterprise ( Empresa
Propietaria de la Red , EPR) to build and operate the first regional transmission system known as the
SIEPAC Line.  Six public electricity enterprises from each of the member countries are participating
in the EPR, together with the Spanish enterprise ENDESA .  The line will be 1,830 km long and should
be completed in 2006; the estimated cost is US$320 million, 75% of which will be financed by a loan
from the Inter-American Development Bank, the rest being contributed by the partners.  At the end of2002, there were interconnections between El Salvador and Guatemala and between El Salvador and
Honduras.
43. The principal instrument used for regulating activity in the distribution branch is the retail end
consumer tariff.  For this purpose, the distribution network operators who act as marketers in the
geographical area in which their networks are situated must each year submit to SIGET, for approval,a tariff schedule containing the prices and conditions of electrical energy supply according to voltage
level, season and time of day.  The tariff schedule fixes approved maximum prices.  For this purpose,
the prices are broken down into three kinds of charges: a charge for energy consumption, a charge for
use of the network and a charge for customer service.  SIGET regulates these two latter charges;
however, the charge for energy consumption, which according to the authorities represents 70% of theprice, is not regulated but determined on the wholesale market.
44. The legislative framework for the sector does not include provisions concerning end-
consumer subsidies; however, the Government does grant direct subsidies focused on low-income
users.  In view of the shortage of resources, up to March 2001 the revenues of the public enterprise
CL were indirectly tapped through discounts granted by that enterprise on invoices for energy sales to
distributors.  Since April 2001, these subsidies have been covered by the State through the National
Electricity and Telephony Investment Fund ( Fondo de Inversión Nacional en Electricidad y
Telefonía , FINET) (see Section (iii)).
45. At present, government policy involves targeting subsidies and State resources on the
expansion of coverage and on low-income consumers.  The following tariff subsidies are in place: a
residential consumption subsidy for monthly consumption of less than 99 kWh; a subsidy on the
pumping of water for the consumption of the State enterprise ANDA and rural cooperatives.According to information provided by SIGET, in  2001, subsidies worth a total of US$26.3 million
were received by 551,000 users, while the imp licit ANDA subsidy amounted to some US$18 million
and the subsidy on the consumption of energy for pumping water to some US$2.5 million.  The tariffs
for these consumers have remained unadjusted, the difference being paid by the  State through
FINET. According to an ECLA report, the subsid ies represented a reduction of up to 76% in the
electricity bill for smaller consumers and, during the period 1998-2001, total subsidies amounted to
some US$167 million.
15 However,  the authorities have pointed out that subsidies were reduced by
more than 50% in 2001 as compared with 2000, totalling US$27 million.
(5) SERVICES
(i) Main characteristics
46. Since the previous Secretariat report there have been considerable changes in the services
sector, particularly in the areas of telecommunications and financial services.  In 2001, the services
sector made a contribution of about 62% to total GDP.  According to the breakdown of the national
                                                     
15 ECLA (2002), Central American Isthmus: the Regulation of the Distribution of Electrical Energy in
Countries with Private Enterprises: the cases of El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Panama. Available at
the following address:  http:///www.eclac.cl/publicacion es/Mexico/6/LCMEXL536/L536.pdf , 28 August 2002.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 82
accounts by the Central Reserve Bank, in 2001 the principal services subsectors in terms of
contribution to total value added were, in decreasing order of importance: commerce; rental housing;
transport and storage; construction; and financial services (Table IV.6).
Table IV.6
Contribution of the principal services sectors to GDP, 1996-2001
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001a
Electricity 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6
Water and sewage 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Construction 3.7 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.9
Commerce 16.7 16.7 16.8 16.5 16.7 16.7
Restaurants and hotels 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1
Transport and  storage 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.8
Communications 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.4 2.7 2.8
Banks, insurance and other financial institutions 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.8 3.8
Real estate and business services 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2
Rental housing 9.0 8.8 8.7 8.4 8.4 8.0
Community, personal and social services 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4
Domestic services 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6
Government services 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4
Industrial and maquila  services 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.1
Total 59.8 60.5 61.0 60.5 61.4 61.7
a Preliminary figures.
Source :B C R .
47. El Salvador’s Schedule of Specific Commitments under the WTO’s General Agreement on
Trade in Services (GATS) includes commitments relating to six of the twelve categories of services
(Table IV.7).16  As regards horizontal commitments, the Schedule of Specific Commitments
establishes the following limitations applicable to foreign investment:  net profits obtained in each
financial year from commercial and services activities may be remitted abroad in amounts of up to
50% of the registered investment;  and payments for rights to use foreign trademarks and patents,technical assistance and other similar services may be remitted freely, provided the value does not
exceed 10% of net sales.  Moreover, in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Law (see
Chapter II(3)), the Schedule stipulates that small-scale trade, industry and provision of services are
reserved exclusively for persons who are nationals of El Salvador by birth, and foreigners may not
hold the positions of administrator, director, manager or representative of such enterprises.  Inaddition, unless specially authorized by the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, every employer
must employ Salvadoran nationals in a proportion of at least 90% of the personnel of his enterprise,
and the amount of wages received by Salvadorans may not be less than 85% of the total wages paid.
48. The authorities have pointed out that the limitations on the repatriation of foreign capital and
the prohibition on foreign investors holding directorships contained in El Salvador’s Schedule ofCommitments corresponded to the legislation in force at the time that the Schedule was negotiated
and were expressly abolished by the 1999 Investment Law.
49. El Salvador’s Schedule of Specific Commitments includes MFN exemptions for all sectors in
favour of the member countries of the Central American Common Market (CACM).  Moreover, for
financial services, El Salvador incorporated exem ptions from MFN treatment in favour of Honduras
and Nicaragua on the basis of the Convention on Facilitating the Financial Integration of Countries of
the Central American Isthmus.
17
                                                     
16 WTO document GATS/SC/29 Supp.1 and 2, of 11 April 1997 and 26 February 1998, respectively.
17 WTO document GATS/EL/29, of 15 April 1994.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 83
Table IV.7
Summary of El Salvador’s commitments under the GATSa
Market access National treatment
Modes of supply:
Cross-border supply 1 1
Consumption abroad 2 2
Commercial presence 3 3
Presence of natural persons 4 4
Commitments (■ full;  ◨ partial;  □ no commitment;  - does not appear in Schedule)
Horizontalb□□◨◨◨◨◨◨
Sector-specific commitments
1. Business services
A. Professional services
a. legal c■■■◨■■■□
b. accounting c□□■□□□■□
c. tax advisory c□□■□□□■□
d. architectural c■■■□■■■□
e. engineering c■■■□■■■□
B. Computer and related services, solely:
c. data processing c■■■□■■■□
C. Research and development services −−−−−−−−
D. Real estate services −−−−−−−−
E. Rental/leasing services without operators
c. rental/leasing of vehicles c□■■□□■■□
F. Other business services
a. advertising c□□■□□□■□
2. Communication services
A. Postal services −−−−−−−−
B. Courier services −−−−−−−−
C. Telecommunications services, solely:
a. voice telephony ■■◨■■■■■
b. packet-switched data transmission ■■◨■■■■■
c. circuit-switched data transmission ■■◨■■■■■
d. telex ■■◨■■■■■
e. telegraph ■■◨■■■■■
f. facsimile ■■◨■■■■■
g. private leased circuits ■■◨■■■■■
o. other c■■◨■■■■■
D. Audiovisual services −−−−−−−−
3. Construction services −−−−−−−−
4. Distribution services −−−−−−−−
5. Educational services −−−−−−−−
6. Environmental services c□□◨□□□□□
7. Financial services
A. Insurance and related services −−−−−−−−
B. Banking and other financial services, solely:
a. Acceptance of deposits and other funds c□□◨□□□□□
b. Loans of all types c□□◨□□□□□WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 84
Market access National treatment
Modes of supply:
Cross-border supply 1 1
Consumption abroad 2 2
Commercial presence 3 3
Presence of natural persons 4 4
C. Other □□◨□□□□□
8. Health and social services −−−−−−−−
9. Tourism and travel related services
A. Hotels and restaurants
a. Hotel and other lodging c□■■□□■■□
b. Meal serving c□■■□□■■□
B. Travel agencies and tour operators c□□■□□□■□
C. Tourist guides services □□■□□□■□
D. Other −−−−−−−−
10. Recreational and sporting services −−−−−−−−
11. Transport services
A. Maritime −−−−−−−−
B. Inland waterway −−−−−−−−
C. Air
d. Maintenance and repair services ■■◨□■■■□
D. Space −−−−−−−−
E. Rail −−−−−−−−
F. Road −−−−−−−−
G. Pipeline −−−−−−−−
H. Auxiliary −−−−−−−−
I. Other −−−−−−−−
12. Other services −−−−−−−−
a The only authentic source of information concerning these commitments is El Salvador’s Schedule of Specific Commitments as
set out in documents GATS/SC/29 (15 April 1994), GATS/SC/29/Suppl.1 (11 April 1997) and GATS/SC/29/Suppl.2(26 February 1998).
b Applicable only to the services included in El Salvador’s Schedule of Commitments.
c Not applicable to all  the subdivisions of  the category (for more details see El Salvador’s Schedule of Commitments).
Source : WTO Secretariat.
(ii) Financial services
(a) Structure and performance
50. In 2001, the financial services sector (including insurance services) made a contribution of
3.8% to total GDP.18  The sector is composed of entities distributed among the following categories:
commercial banks; stock market entities (securities exchanges, stockbrokers, and companies
specializing in the deposit and custody of securities); foreign exchange dealers; forecasting entities;
public warehouses; financial intermediaries (cooperatives, federations, and savings and loan
societies); public credit institutions; and insurance and guarantee entities.
                                                     
18 Preliminary estimate published by the Central Reserve Bank (2002), Quarterly Review, October-
November-December 2001.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 85
51. The financial system is supervised by the following bodies: the Financial System
Superintendency ( Superintendencia del Sistema Financiero , SSF); the Securities Superintendency
(Superintendencia de Valores) ; and the Pensions Superintendency ( Superintendencia de Pensiones ).
The functions of the SSF include: ensuring compliance with the laws, regulations and other legal
provisions applicable to the Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador and other entities under its
supervision; issuing rules governing the functioning of the institutions under its control; authorizing
the establishment, operation and closure of the banks, insurance companies and other financial entities
designated by law; ensuring the transparency of information; applying sanctions; and intervening in
financial sector entities in difficulty.  The Securities Superintendency is responsible for overseeing
compliance with the provisions applicable to stock market entities and facilitating the development of
the securities market, while the Pensions Superintendency oversees the pension system.  At the sametime, the Central Reserve Bank is responsible for ensuring that the payment systems function
normally.
(b) Multilateral commitments
52. El Salvador participated in the financial services negotiations and accepted the Fifth Protocol
annexed to the GATS, incorporating it into its le gislation by means of Legislative Decree No. 653 of
13 March 1999, published in Official Journal No. 97 of 26 May 1999.  There are some differences
between the scope of the commitments undertaken on the basis of these negotiations and those
undertaken in the context of the Uruguay Round.  Fo r example, with respect to commercial presence
in the banking sector, in the Uruguay Round El Salvador undertook to grant access to foreign
financial institutions through the establishment of branches or participation in the ownership of
domestic banks and finance houses limited to a maximum of 50%.  In the new offer this level was
increased to 75% for prime foreign financial in stitutions subject to prudential regulation and
supervision in their countries of origin.  However, the maximum percentage that foreign natural
persons may acquire was reduced from 50 to 25%.  Moreover, the initial Schedule limited the holding
of shares by a natural or legal person to a maximum of 5% of the capital per institution, whereas in the
new Schedule this requirement was eliminated and replaced with a provision allowing a natural or
legal person to hold shares representing more than 1% of the capital of a financial institution onlywith the approval of the SSF.
19  At the same time, the most recent Schedule only includes
commitments with respect to measures of the ty pe specified in Article XVI:2 (f) of the GATS
(limitations on the participation of foreign capital) and does not explicitly include the possibility of
access through branches.
53. El Salvador did not include insurance services in its GATS commitments resulting from either
the Uruguay Round or the Fifth Protocol negotiations.
(c) Banking
Characteristics and performance
54. On 30 June 2002, the Salvadoran banking sector consisted of 13 operating banks (including a
subsidiary of a foreign bank, two State banks and two branches of foreign banks) and one financehouse authorized to accept funds from the public.
20  Of the shareholders in the entities covered by the
Banks Law established in El Salvador (that is to say, excluding the two branches of foreign banks)
                                                     
19 WTO document GATS/SC/29/Suppl.2 of 26 February 1998.
20 In addition to the entities mentioned, there is a bank in process of liquidation, Banco CREDISA ,
which has not been included in the figures given in this Section.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 86
52% were Salvadoran natural or legal persons, 31% were Central American persons and 17% were
persons from other countries, among which the largest investors were banks from Canada, the
United States and Germany.  Four banking entities  were controlled by foreign shareholders: two by
Nicaraguan shareholders, one by Canadian shareholde rs and another by Panamanian shareholders.  In
2001, under cover of the new Banks Law, the establishment or regularization plans for the adaptation
of a number of financial conglomerates, as defined in the new Law (see below), were approved.
55. In addition to the entities authorized to accept funds from the public, the Salvadoran financial
sector includes entities authorized to carry out active operations; on 31 December 2001, these entities
included four branch offices of foreign institutions, operating as information centres or placing funds
in El Salvador in the form of loans or investments, and 11 public credit institutions.
56. On 30 June 2002, the total assets of the banking system amounted to US$9,082 million
mainly distributed among loan portfolios (57.6% of total assets), financial investments (19%) and
liquid assets (12.64%); liabilities amounted to US$8,278 million and were mainly distributed between
deposits (77.8% of total liabilities) and loans (15.3%).
57. Since 1998, the banking sector's loan portfolio has not been very dynamic, especially since
2001, despite the fall in interest rates (Table IV.8).  Deposits increased in line with the trend ineconomic activity up to 2001, but then declined in the first half of 2002, in line with the banks'
increasing interest, following the en try into force of the Law on Monetary Integration, in raising funds
abroad (see below).
Table IV.8
Evolution of net loan portfolio and deposit taking, 1997 – June 2002
(US$ million)
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 (June)
Loans 4,556 5,052 5,132 5,120 5,118 5,229
Deposits 5,083 5,481 5,894 6,189 6,503 6,435
Source : Financial System Superintendency (2002), Statistical Bulletin: Banks, April - June 2002.  Available online at the following
address:  http://www.ssf.gob.sv/.
58. Although the volume of credit increased slightly in the first half of 2002, the increase (2.2%
relative to December 2001) was modest considering the substantial reduction in interest rates which,as a result of the Law on Monetary Integration, fell, in the case of loans with a term of up to one year,
from 9.6% in June 2001 to 6.9% in June 2002 and, in the case of loans with a term of more than year,
from 11.4 to 8.2%.  The banks are therefore in a very liquid situation, which has led them to place
funds abroad in the form of loans and investments in foreign government sovereign bonds.
21  The SSF
notes that the banks are seeking new users via regional expansion through financial conglomeratesand the opening of representative offices in other countries.
59. Despite the fall in interest rates, the slu ggish domestic credit market, together with the
dollarization of the economy, has also led the banks to raise long-term funds more cheaply on the
international market and to take less interest in attracting savings on the domestic market.  Another
consequence of the weakness of the demand for credit has been that the banking system has built upunnecessarily large reserves of liquidity.  At the end of June 2002, reserves totaled
US$1,384.7 million, as compared with required reserves of 1,367.9 million.
                                                     
21 Financial System Superintendency (2002), Statistical Bulletin: Banks.  Available at the Internet
address http://www.ssf.gob.sv/ .El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 87
60. According to a study published in 2000, between 1987 and 2000 the credit asset quality
indicators for the Salvadoran banking industry tended to deteriorate, in particular as a result of the
operations of the State banks, especially the Agricultural Development Bank.22  In order to improve
the solvency of the Salvadoran banking system, the new Banks Law (see below) established stricter
solvency requirements.  In principle, the banks must  always maintain a ratio of at least 12% between
their capital base and their total risk-weighted assets.  In practice, to meet this solvency requirement,provision has been made for a transition period with an interim target of 9.6% for the year 2000 and a
series of further increments until the objective of 12% is achieved in 2005.
61. The Salvadoran banking system has made considerable progress towards this goal.  On
30 June 2002, the base capital requirement with respect to the system’s weighted assets was 11.85%,
i.e. above the legal limit of 10.5% for 2002.  On the same date, loans in default amounted toUS$211.8 million or 3.9% of the total, an improvement on the levels for December 2000 due to the
fall in interest rates and the rescheduling of coffee sector debt (see below).
23  The bad debt provisions
are sufficient to provide more than 100% cover.
62. With respect to the situation at the Agricu ltural Development Bank, the authorities have
pointed out that at present it is under the disciplines of the Banks Law and is completing the processof transition from being a bank that receives a certain amount of State support into a bank that has to
compete with others.  The transition process includes cutbacks in personnel and the number of
branches and the sale of assets.  However, on 30 June 2002, the percentage of delinquent loans
(23.8%) was still high and the cover (58.7%) low.  In 2002, the Agricultural Development Bank
began granting loans again.
63. In recent years, an important aspect of financial policy was the establishment, in 2001, of the
Environmental Trust for the Conservation of the Coffee Forest (FICAFE).  The participating banks:Agrícola, Cuscatlán, Salvadoreño, Comercio, Hipo tecario and the Agricultural Development Bank
have contributed US$250.2 million of loan portfolios to the Trust in exchange for bonds.  FICAFE
has a US$40 million government guarantee.  Through the Trust and thanks to the government
guarantee, the loans have been restructured so as to offer longer terms and considerably lower interest
rates.  In June 2002, total coffee sector debt amounted to US$273.3 million.  Although the creation ofFICAFE constituted a form of risk reduction for the financial system, the persistently low level of
international coffee prices, far below that envisaged when the Trust was set up, has increased the
probability of some of the loans being written off.
Legislative framework
64. Since the last El Salvador trade policy review, the Salvadoran financial system has undergone
substantial changes, especially in the legislative area, with the adoption of the new Banks Law and the
Non-Banking Financial Intermediaries Law (Table IV.9).  Another significant development was the
entry into force, in 2001, of the Law on Monetary Integration which paved the way for the transition
to a dollarized economy (Chapter I).
                                                     
22 Lemus Gómez, R. (2000), The banking industry in the nineties, Research Series No. 2000-1,
FUSADES, 2000.
23 In December 2000, delinquent loans totalled US$268.6 million or 5% of total loans.  In
December 2001, total delinquent loans had fallen to US$216. 9 million or 4.2% of total loans.  Financial System
Superintendency, Financial Accounts and Indicators December 2001. Available at the Internet address
http://www.ssf.gob.sv/cont/pub/anuariob01/iii.doc.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 88
65. The Banks Law stipulates that all banks established in El Salvador must be organized and
operate as closed-end public limited companies with their capital divided into registered shares held
by not less than ten shareholders.  At least 51% of the shares must be owned by investors of the
following types: Salvadoran or Central American natural persons; Salvadoran legal persons whose
shareholders or majority members are Salvadoran or Central American natural persons or other
Salvadoran legal persons; foreign banks and other financial institutions which are subject in theircountry of origin to prudential regulation and supervision in accordance with international practice
and are classified as prime names by internationally recognized rating agencies.  The SSF maintains a
Register of Prime Foreign Banks and Financial Institutions which, in the second half of 2002, was
made up of 50 banks from Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Netherlands,
Panama, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States and Venezuela.
24
Table IV.9
Main financial system legislation
Title of law Date of entry into
force (publication)Description
Non-Banking Financial
Intermediaries Law31 March 2001 Regulates the organization, operation and financial intermediation activities of
cooperative savings and loan societies and associations which accept funds from
the public, as well as Federations.
Law on Monetary Integration 1 January 2001
(22 December2000)Makes the US dollar unlimited and unrestricted legal tender and fixes the colon-
dollar exchange rate at 8.75.
Banks Law 8 October 1999
(30 September1999)Establishes the legal framework for the operation of the banks based on
international principles of banking regulation and supervision.  Also establishesmechanisms for the consolidated supervision of financial conglomerates.  Creates
the Deposit Guarantee Institute ( Instituto de Garantía de Depósitos ).
Organic Law of the Pensions
Superintendency1 January 1997 Creates the public law institution responsible for supervising and monitoring
compliance with the legal provisions applicable to the operation of the pensionssavings system, the public pensions system and the pensions system for the
administrative institutions.
Pension Savings System Law 1 January 1997
(23 December
1996)Creates the pensions savings system for administering the funds for paying benefits
to members to cover the risks of disability, old age and death.
Insurance Companies Law 5 December 1996
(4 November 1996)Regulates the  establishment and operation of insurance companies and the
participation of intermediaries.
Organic Law of the SecuritiesSuperintendency13 October 1996
(4 October 1996)Creates the specialized public law institution responsible for overseeing and
regulating the securities market and its various participants.
Multisectoral Investment Bank(BMI) Establishment Law5 June 1994
(27 May 1994)Establishes the BMI as a public credit institution with legal personality and its own
resources to promote the development of private sector investment projects by
providing medium and long-term financing.
Securities Market Law 30 April 1994
(21 April 1994)Establishes the legal and institutional framework for the operation of the securities
market.
Organic Law of the Central Bank
of El Salvador12 May 1991
(3 May 1991)Grants the Central Reserve Bank institutional autonomy and assigns it, inter alia ,
the priority tasks of ensuring the normal operation of the payment systems andfostering a competitive and solvent financial system.
Organic Law of the FinancialSystem Superintendency19 December 1990
(10 December1990)Regulates the activities of the Superintendency in its capacity as overseer of the
financial system and grants it administrative and budgetary autonomy in theperformance of its functions, while investing it with powers to regulate the system
and sanction non-compliance.
Foreign Exchange Dealers Law 15 April 1990
(6 April 1990)Regulates the authorization and operations of companies routinely engaged in the
buying and selling of foreign currencies, while granting the Central Bank powers to
authorize their operations and the SSF powers to oversee them.
Small-Enterprise Finance
Company and Guarantee Fund
(FIGAPE) Law16 June 1973
(7 June 1973)Creates an autonomous credit and guarantee institution for small traders and
manufacturers.
Social Fund for Housing Law 15 June 1973
(6 June 1973)Establishes the Social Fund for Housing as a credit institution.
                                                     
24 Information available online at: http://www.ssf.gob.sv/.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 89
Title of law Date of entry into
force (publication)Description
Agricultural Development Bank
Law4 May 1973
(25 April 1973)Creates the official credit institution known as the Agricultural Development Bank,
whose fundamental objectives are to create, promote and maintain financialfacilities for contributing to agricultural development and to act as financial agentfor the organizations responsible for implementing rural welfare and agrarian
structural reform programmes.
Commercial Code 1 April 1971
(31 July 1970)Regulates the activities of traders, commercial transactions and commercial affairs,
thus constituting the basis of the financial legal system and, ultimately, one of the
main pieces of supplementary legislation.
Source : Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador, available at www.bcr.gob.sv/finan002.htm.
66. No natural or legal person, either directly or through an intermediary, may hold shares in a
bank that represent more than 1% of the institu tion’s capital, without the pr ior authorization of the
SSF.  The minimum capital required to establish a bank in El Salvador is US$11 million.
67. Subject to authorization by the SSF, foreign banks may establish branches in El Salvador to
carry out the same operations as domestic banks.  Likewise, subject to authorization, foreign banks
may open offices to serve as information centres for their customers or for placing funds in thecountry in the form of loans or investments, without engaging in deposit operations in the national
territory.  In both cases, authorization is granted for a period of two years which can be extended for
further identical periods.  Under the Law, depositors and creditors domiciled in El Salvador have
preferential rights over assets owned by a foreign financial institution in El Salvador.
68. With respect to national treatment, the Banks Law stipulates that, except where the law
provides otherwise, the branches and offices of foreign financial institutions operating in El Salvador
shall enjoy the same rights and privileges, be subject to the same laws and be governed by the same
rules and regulations as apply to domestic banks.  The authorities have pointed out that at present
there is no legislation providing for the non-applic ation of national treatment to foreign institutions.
69. The Banks Law also establishes mechanisms for the consolidated supervision of financial
conglomerates by the SSF.  A financial conglomerate is defined as a group of companies
characterized by the fact that more than 50% of their shareholders’ capital is owned by a holding
company, which is also a member of the conglomerate.  Nevertheless, the SSF may agree to a bank
established abroad forming part of a conglomerate, provided that the holding company owns at least
45% of the shares of the bank in question and a number of specific prudential requirements are met.
70. The holding company may be a company whose exclusive purpose is to invest in more than
50% of the capital of financial entities, or a bank established in El Salvador.  In the first case, the
holding company may hold minority investments, totalling not more than 25% of its base capital, in
the shares of Salvadoran institutions that administer pension funds.  However, if the holding company
is a bank, neither that bank nor its subsidiaries may invest in the share capital of pension fund
administering institutions or of insurance companie s.  Holding companies are subject to supervision
by the SSF, which is allowed access to their information for the purpose of supervising theconglomerate as a whole.
71. Apart from the holding company, a conglomerate may consist of a bank and one or more
financial sector entities such as insurance companies, institutions that administer pension funds,
stockbrokers, companies specializing in security deposit and custody, credit card companies, foreign
exchange dealers, leasing companies, and public warehouses, including their subsidiaries, dulyoverseen by the SSF or by the appropriate supervisory body.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 90
72. Salvadoran banks more than 50% of whose shares are owned by a foreign financial entity
(banks or financial conglomerates) may only share names, assets and infrastructure or offer joint
services to the public with other companies of the same conglomerate if the aforementioned entity
establishes a subsidiary holding company in El Salvador.  Foreign banks and financial institutions that
establish agencies or branches in El Salvador and whose parent companies or companies of the
financial conglomerate to which they belong own more than 50% of other financial sector companiesin El Salvador, may operate in the same way as a financial conglomerate without having to establish a
subsidiary holding company in the country.
73. Another important change introduced by the Banks Law was the creation of the Deposit
Guarantee Institute to guarantee the public's deposits in the event of the winding up of a bank or its
compulsory liquidation and to assist with the restructuring of banks with solvency problems.  TheInstitute's assets consist mainly of a one-off contribution of 250 million colons from the Central Bank
and the premiums paid by the member banks.  The maximum cover for deposits is US$6,285; all
private banks must be members of the Institute, with the exception of subsidiaries of foreign banks if
the deposits are guaranteed in the country in which those banks are established.  As far as State banks
are concerned, the El Salvador Mortgage Bank ( Banco Hipotecario ) is subject to the same deposit
insurance regime as a private bank, but in the case of the Agricultural Development Bank the
guarantee is provided by the State.
74. Article 20 of the Law on Monetary Integration introduced, as from 1 January 2001, new
provisions relating to the liquidity reserves that the banks must maintain.  Under this Law, the SSF
establishes a liquidity reserve which, in proportion to their deposits and liabilities, the banks have to
maintain and which is administered by the Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador.  For 2001 and 2002,
the liquidity reserve of each bank may consist of US dollar deposits in the Central Reserve Bank or ofsecurities issued by the latter in the same currency.  From 2003 onwards, the reserve may also be
invested abroad, in deposits with prime banks or in highly liquid low-risk securities.  The Law
stipulates that a weighted average of 20% of deposits must be maintained as a liquidity reserve, and
that the average liquidity reserve should not be more than 25% of deposits.
75. The implementation of the liquidity reserve requ irements is governed by Regulations NPB3-
06 "Regulations for the Calculation and Use of the Liquidity Reserve on Deposits and Other
Liabilities".  The SSF is responsible for verifying compliance with the reserve requirements, as well
as for determining the daily surpluses and shortf alls and providing the Central Reserve Bank with
information on the liquidity situation of each bank.  The liquidity reserve is deposited in the Central
Reserve Bank, 50% in the form of a sight deposit and 50% of the form of investment in nonnegotiablesecurities issued by the Central Bank, and is remunerated.  The Central Reserve Bank will receive a
commission for administering this reserve.  The first 25% of the funds maintained under the new
reserve mechanism is available without the payment of interest, whereas the second tranche of 25% is
subject to the collection of a fee proportional to the funds by the Central Reserve Bank.  The
disbursement of funds from the remaining 50% requires the approval of the SSF.
(d) Insurance
Characteristics and performance
76. On 30 June 2002, El Salvador had 20 insurance companies of which 18 were fully operational
and two were in process of liquidation.  The shares of these 20 companies were distributed as follows:
86.4% of the shares were owned by Salvadoran persons, 0.2% by persons from countries in the
Central American area, and the remaining 13.4% by persons from other countries, among which thebiggest investors were Spain with 7.9% and the United States with 3.5%.  Only two of theseEl Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 91
enterprises were controlled by foreign investors.  The State does not participate in the insurance
sector.  In October 2002, after the two companies mentioned above had been liquidated, the number
of insurers fell to 18.
77. According to the SSF, in 2002, the solvency situation of the insurance system, even though it
had experienced a number of difficulties, was acceptable.25  Despite the claims which it had had to
pay out for the earthquakes that occurred at the beginning of 2001, the sector's profits were 18.4%
higher than those for the previous year, while the profits recorded in the first half of 2002 were one-
third higher than those for the same period of the previous year.  The insurance companies received
claims for US$328.5 million for the total losses caused by the earthquakes of 2001.26  By 30 June
2002 almost 95% of these claims had been paid.  According to information provided by the SSF, the
resulting loss for the insurance system was of the order of US$6.4 million.
78. Despite the fact that the sector's losses were limited, one negative effect of the earthquakes
was an increase in the price of international reinsurance and a reduction in the coverage and exclusion
of some risks.  This was reflected in a generalized increase in premiums, which in its turn led to a fall
in the number of customers and a decline in policy renewals.  Overall, the rise in premiums offset the
fall in volume and made possible an increase in profits.
79. As a result of the legislative changes introduced with respect to financial conglomerates, the
structure of the insurance sector has changed considerably through a process of acquisitions and
mergers and conglomerate formation.  In May 2002, the SSF approved the acquisition of a majority of
the shares in the companies Seguros Universales, S.A.  Seguros de Personas and Compañía Mundial
de Seguros, S.A. by the company Corporación Excelencia, S.A. of C.V.
Legislative framework
80. Insurance activities are regulated by the Insurance Companies Law of 1997.  This Law
requires insurance companies established in El Salvador to be organized and to operate in the form of
closed-end public liability companies of indefinite duration with their capital divided into registered
shares.  As distinct from the banks, the Law does not require a minimum number of shareholders.
However, no natural or legal person may, either dire ctly or through an intermediary, own shares in an
insurance company that represent more than 1%  of the company's capital, without the prior
authorization of the SSF.
81. At least 75% of the shares of insurance companies must be held, individually or collectively,
by the following classes of persons: Salvadoran or Central American natural or legal persons, or
Central American or other foreign insurance or re insurance companies.  Foreign companies outside
the Central American area must have prime ratings as established by the SSF on the basis of the
ratings awarded by internationally recognized rating agencies.  The cross-border supply of insurance
services is not permitted.
                                                     
25 According to information provided by the SSF, based on a risk analysis by two international risk
classifiers, the Salvadoran insurance companies fall between categories EAA (very high capacity to meet their
obligations on the terms and within the periods agreed, strong protection factors and modest risk) and EBBB-
(adequate payment capacity, adequate protection factors).
26 Financial System Superintendency (2002), Statistical Bulletin: Insurance, April-June 2002.
Available at the following address:  http://www.ssf.gob.sv/.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 92
(iii) Telecommunications
82. The telecommunications sector has undergone considerable changes in recent years,
especially since the privatization of the State-owned company National Telecommunications
Administration ( Administración Nacional de Telecomunicaiones , ANTEL) and the adoption of a new
legislative framework.  The privatization of ANTEL was regulated by the Law Privatizing the
National Telecommunications Administration (Decree No. 53 of 24 July 1997, published in OfficialJournal No. 143 of 7 August 1997).  ANTEL was divided into two entities, the Telecommunications
Company of El Salvador ( Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de El Salvador , CTE), devoted mainly to
wire-based telephone services, and the International Telecommunications company ( Internacional de
Telecomunicaciones , INTEL), devoted mainly to wireless telephone services.  Control of CTE was
acquired by France Telecom  at auction; the State continues to hold the equivalent of 43% of the
company's share capital.  The authorities have pointed out that the aim is to privatize the enterprise
completely.  For its part, INTEL was acquired at auction by a consortium led by Telefónica de
España .
83. From the outset, both companies have had to compete with other operators in the market.  In
May 2002, El Salvador had 9 fixed line operators (AESTEL, Cablevisa, CTE, EMETEL, GCA,SALNET, SALTEL, Telefónica and Telemóvil) and f our mobile telephone operators (CTE Personal,
Telefónica, Telemóvil and DIGICEL).  CTE controlled  90% of the fixed telephone lines, while in
mobile telephony the principal operator was Telemóvil (45% of subscribers) followed by Telefónica
(29%), CTE Personal (23%) and DIGICEL (3%).
84. Communications sector value added increased considerably in real terms between 1998 and
2001; in terms of contribution to total value added, the telecommunications sector, together with the
postal services sector, contributed 2.8% in 2001 as compared with 1.9% in 1998.  With respect toinfrastructure, the trend in the indicators has likewise been accelerating: the number of fixed lines rose
from some 387,000 in 1988 to more than 709,000 in May 2002; meanwhile, the number of subscribers
to the cellular mobile telephone system rose from 137,000 to about 908,000 during the same period.
Moreover, the standard-of-service indicators provided by the Electricity and Telecommunications
Supervisory Authority (SIGET) point to an improvement in the situation.  However, the tariffs haveincreased for both local and national calls in the case of fixed telephony and have remained
unchanged since 1999 in the case of mobile telephony.   At the same time,  the tariffs for long-
distance calls have fallen considerably in recent years (Table IV.10).
Table IV.10
Telecommunications indicators
Size and quality of the telephone network 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002d
Telephone lines in operation 386,659 495,340 625,785 649,879 709,394
Total capacity of local telephone exchanges (number of users) 523,294 603,761 711,737 2,945,774 ..
Main lines connected to digital exchanges (%) 84 88 100 100 ..
Number of coin-operated public telephones 4,926 .. .. 1,754 ..
Number of prepaid card-operated public telephones .. 21,715 22,075 16,916 ..
Number of subscribers to the cellular mobile phone system 137,114 511,365 743,628 857,782 908,227
Number of telex subscriber lines 467 358 393 1,079 ..
Number of leased circuits .. 60 190 184 ..
Subscribers to public data networks .. 500 1,865 2,131 ..
Standard of service
Outstanding applications for residential telephone lines 174,163 103,617 72,566 37,991 ..
Outstanding applications for business telephone lines .. .. .. 256 ..
Telephone service faults repaired the next working day (%) .. .. 76 79 ..El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 93
Size and quality of the telephone network 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002d
Number of telephone service faults reported by users .. .. .. 234,073 ..
Peak-hour calls not completed (%) .. .. 5 11 ..
Operator services responding within 15 seconds (%) .. .. 91 87 ..
Traffica
Local telephone trafficb45,947 2,787,143 3,3345,513 3,492,329 ..
National telephone trafficb9,170 313,617 474,282 814,111 ..
International telephone traffic (incoming) 223,524 398,284 710,330 801,918 ..
International telephone traffic (outgoing) 38,843 53,562 138,815 157,673 ..
Tariffsc (US$)
Charge for installing telephone service 335,77 335,77 335,77 335,77 ..
Basic monthly charge, residential 6,84 7,13 7,13 8,12 9,43
Basic monthly charge, business 13,69 14,21 14,21 14,21 16,14
Cost per local minute (US cents) 1,94 2,01 2,29 2,29 2,65
Cost per national minute (US cents) 3,23 3,36 3,82 3,82 4,45
Cost per minute for calls from fixed to mobile 0,02 0,23 0,23 0,23 0,23
Cost per minute for international calls (United States only)
during business hours0,80 0,48 0,25 0,25 0,25
Investments
Total annual investment in telecommunications, including
land and buildings (US$ million)477 711 877 163 ..
.. Not available.
a In thousands of minutes.
b Not including CTE traffic for 1998.
c VAT included (tariffs applied by the responsible operator).
d Data obtained up to May 2002.
Source : Electricity and Telecommunications Supervisory Authority, Telecommunications Manager’s Office, Indicator Handbook.
Available at the following address:  http://www.siget.gob.sv/, 29 July 2002.
85. The legislative framework for the telecommunicatio ns sector consists mainly of the following
laws and regulations:  the Telecommunications Law (Legislative Decree No. 142, of
6 November 1997, published in Official Journal No. 218, of 21 November 1997), its amendments
(Legislative Decree No. 87, of 27 April 2001, pub lished in Official Journal No. 90 of 16 May 2001)
and its Regulations (Legislative Decree No. 64 of 15 May 1998);  the Law Establishing the General
Superintendency for Electricity and Telecommunications (Legislative Decree No. 808, of
12 November 1996, published in Official Journal No. 189, 9 October 1996), its amendments
(Legislative Decree No. 175, of 4 December 1997, published in Official Journal No. 239 of 22
December 1997) and its Regulations (Executive Decree No. 56 of 13 May 1998, published in OfficialJournal No. 88 of 15 May 1998);  and the Law on the National Electricity and Telephony Investment
Fund (Legislative Decree No. 354 of 29 July 1998, published in Official Journal No. 142 of 29 July
1998) and its amendments (Legislative Decree No. 859 of 30 May 2002, published in Official Journal
No. 115 of 24 June 2002).
86. The Ministry of the Economy is responsible for formulating telecommunications policy,
while the General Electricity and Telecommunications Superintendency (SIGET), an autonomous
entity assigned to the Ministry of the Economy, is the institution responsible for applying and
monitoring compliance with the sector's rules a nd regulations.  SIGET is also responsible for
administering, managing and overseeing the radio-frequency spectrum, which is owned by the State.
87. The Law on Telecommunications (LT) applies to the activities of the telecommunications
sector and, in particular, the regulation of the public telephone service, the use of the radio-frequencyWT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 94
spectrum, access to essential resources and the numbering system, including the allocation of codes
for accessing the multi-carrier system.  The objectives of the LT include: facilitating access to
telecommunications for all sectors of the population; protecting the rights of users and providers of
telecommunications services; ensuring the rational and efficient use of the radio-frequency spectrum;
and developing a competitive telecommunications market at all levels.
88. The LT requires the prices and conditions of telecommunications services to be negotiated
freely between operators, except as regards access to essential resources.  Operators interested in
providing public telephone services must apply to SIGET for a concession to operate the service,
which, provided that they comply with the regist ration requirements laid down, will be automatically
granted, once they are registered, for a period of 30 years without any limitation as to number or
location, it being possible for there to be more than one concession in the same geographical area.
89. The maximum public telephone service tariffs are determined and approved by SIGET in
accordance with the provisions of the LT.  The latter provides for the maximum access charges to be
those applied by the operators the day before the entry into force of the LT and stipulates that from
that date up to and including the year 2002 these prices may be adjusted annually by SIGET by the
same percentage as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) published by the Ministry of the Economy.  TheLaw also provides that up to 2002, inclusive, telephone network operators that control less than 10%
of a particular market or service and are not linked by crossholdings with any other operator, may opt
to request SIGET to approve their own maximum tariffs on the basis of their real costs or accept the
maximum tariffs that SIGET has approved for other operators.
27  Starting in 2003, SIGET was to have
adjusted the maximum telephone tariffs on the basis of an index that depended 50% on the CPI and
50% on the rate of depreciation of the colon in relation to the dollar.28  This ceased to apply with the
Law on Monetary Integration although, according to the competent authority, the indexationmechanism which will be used to replace it is still being studied.
90. To encourage investment in new telephone lines, the LT authorized SIGET to conclude five-
year investment contracts with the access network operators controlling more than 10% of the market
in which targets for the installation of new lines are agreed.  In return, when the maximum tariffs for
national services are approved, tariff adjustments additional to those previously mentioned may beintroduced.  In this connection, it is provided that, from the beginning of the investment contract,
SIGET may approve an additional percentage increment for the maximum charges for access and
additional telephone services equal to the growth of the telephone network of the operator concerned,
up to a maximum of 15% in the first year, and 20% in each of the remaining four years, subject to
certain time limitations.  A contract of this type was signed with CTE in 1998 and was in force at theend of 2002.  The authorities have pointed out that, in practice, under these arrangements tariffs
increased by an amount less than that permitted by the LT.
                                                     
27 Information on the maximum tariffs applicable in the current year is available online at SIGET’s
Internet address: http://www.siget.gob.sv/.
28 Up to 2002 the following adjustment formula was applied: P 1 = (P 0)  · (IPC 1/IPC 0), while from 2003
the formula will be:  P 1 = (P 0/2) · ((IPC 1/IPC 0) + (XR 1/XR 0)), where: P 1 is the value of each maximum charge
from the date of indexation; P 0 is the value of the same maximum charge corresponding to the reference date or
the immediately preceding indexation date; IPC 1 is the consumer price index from the first day of indexation;
IPC 0 is the consumer price index on the immediately preceding indexation date; XR 1 and XR 0 are the exchange
rates for current money in El Salvador against the US dollar from the first day of indexation and on the
immediately preceding indexation date, respectively. From 2001, under the Law on Monetary Integration, the
value of the ratio XR 1/XR 0 was statutorily fixed at 1.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 95
91. The radio-frequency spectrum is owned by the State and, in accordance with the LT, is
classified as for free use, official use, and regulated use.  No concession is needed to exploit the free-
use spectrum.  To exploit part of the regulated-use spectrum it is necessary to ask SIGET for a
concession, which is granted for a period of 20 years.  Concessions have been awarded mainly on the
basis of auctions, by means of which the Government collected US$221.4 million between 1998 in
2001.  The base price for a concession to exploit the radio-frequency spectrum is determined inaccordance with a formula which takes into account the total transmission and reception bandwidth,
the base unit price of the spectrum, and the target population.  A concession may be revoked if it is
not used within two years of being granted.
92. Satellite communications system operators that transmit from the national territory must,
among other things, have rights to use the spectrum clearly established by international conventions,treaties or agreements signed and ratified by El Salvador or by obtaining a concession to use the
spectrum granted by SIGET.
93. The services deemed to be essential include interconnection, at all levels, for the purpose of
terminating telecommunications or transferring telecommunications originating in the network of one
of the parties to another network selected by the end user; signaling; the handover of automaticidentification of the number of the user originating the communication; billing data; the portability of
the user's telephone number; and the recording of users in the telephone directory.  Under the LT,
every commercial telecommunications network operator must provide access to essential resources to
any operator that asks for them, subject to appr opriate payment and without discrimination of any
kind.
94. The prices and technical conditions for access to essential resources are negotiated between
the parties; if agreement cannot be reached on any or all of the points, the parties may call on SIGETto settle the dispute.  The LT also stipulates that network interconnection may be freely negotiated
except as regards access to the above-mentioned essential resources.
95. The LT incorporates safeguards against anti-competitive practices, in particular, it prohibits
operators from concluding any type of agreement on fixing, raising, concentrating or manipulating the
prices they charge for selling or leasing their services to third parties or end users, as well asdistribution agreements.  Cross subsidies in connection with services offered in competition with
other operators are also prohibited.
96. Finally, the LT establishes a special regime for the telecommunications activities of operators
providing the following services: free-reception sound broadcasting; free-reception television; sound
broadcasting by subscription via cable or radio; and television broadcasting by subscription via cableor radio.  The services require concessions which are granted for a period of 20 years.  Only natural
persons Salvadoran by birth or Salvadoran legal persons (entities with at least 51% of the capital in
Salvadoran hands) may obtain concessions for providing free-reception broadcasting services.
97. The National Electricity and Telephony Investment Fund (FINET) was established for the
purpose of facilitating access to electricity and telephone services for rural communities and low-income families.  FINET's functions include subsidizing telephone infrastructure and the supply of
telephone services (and of electrical energy, see Section 4) in rural and low-income areas, provided
that they benefit the community.
29  The Law provides for the Fund to subsidize these activities using
                                                     
29 Electricity consumption associat ed with water extraction and pumping projects and with buildings
used for providing educational and health services, if co mmunity owned or administered, are considered to be of
benefit to the community.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 96
the income obtained as a result of investing its res ources.  The assets of the Fund consist mainly of
contributions from the State, 98.5% of the resources generated by granting concessions to use the
radio-frequency spectrum, and all the resources produced by concessions for generating geothermal
and hydroelectric power.  In January 2002, 18 FINET-funded projects awarded by auction, with a
total value of US$1.64 million, were in progress, together with 57 projects awarded by competition
for funds ( concurso de fondos ), with a total value or US$5.54 million.
98. El Salvador bound the level of market access provided for by its legislation in its Schedule of
Commitments agreed during the GATS Negotiations on Basic Telecommunications.30  During those
negotiations, El Salvador significantly increased its commitments with respect to its 1994 offer,
binding services provided at national and international level via public and non-public basic
telecommunications networks for all modes of supply and with respect to both market access andnational treatment.
31
(iv) Transport
(a) Maritime transport
99. In October 2002, the Vice-Ministry of Transport, created in 1994 within the Ministry of
Public Works, Housing and Transport, was the body  responsible for regulating all maritime transport
policy.  This work was carried out through the Maritime Transport Directorate.  The Vice-Ministry
must also approve port charges and changes in those charges.
100. El Salvador's Port System comprises two commercial ports, the ports of Acajutla and Cutuco,
both managed, at the end of 2002, by the Executive Aut onomous Ports Commission ( Comisión
Ejecutiva Portuaria Autónoma,  CEPA).  The fishing ports are under the management of the Ministry
of the Economy.  Under its Organization Law,  CEPA has exclusive responsibility for: the
administration, exploitation, management and executi on of the port operations of all Salvadoran port
facilities not subject to a special regime, such as the custody, handling and storage of exports and
imports.  CEPA is also responsible for the facilities of El Salvador's International Airport (see Section
(iv) (b)).  CEPA may contract out certain tasks, bu t must retain direct management of the ports.  At
the end of 2002, the services subcontracted to private enterprises included, among other things:
mooring, loading, transferring cargo from hold to wharf and vice versa, and storage.
101. In mid-2002, all maritime cargo was being handled in the Port of Acajutla, the Port of Cutuco
being out of operation.  In 1999, the Port of Acaj utla handled 2.3 million tonnes of cargo; if the
petroleum and petroleum derivatives moved in the vessels of the RASA refinery -- a private enterprise
established by a consortium of the oil companies Esso and Shell -- are taken into account, the total
cargo moved increases to a little over 4 million tonnes.  Most of this volume (about 86%)corresponded to imports.  With respect to previous years, it is possible to observe a slight increase in
the volume of cargo handled in Salvadoran ports.  Export volumes have been affected by the decline
in coffee exports.
102. In October 2002, the Legislative Assembly approved the tendering procedure for giving out
the management and operation of the Port of Acajutla on concession to the private sector.
32  T h e
                                                     
30 WTO document GATS/SC/29/suppl.1, 11 April 1997.
31 In the case of market access through commercial  presence, application must be made to the
Electricity and Telecommunications Supervis ory Authority for a concession or licence.
32 Decree No. 1014 of 3 October 2002, published in the Official Journal.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 97
concession will be granted for a period of 25 years and calls for a series of compulsory investments
which have to be made in the course of the first 3 years following contract signature, for a minimum
of US$10,875,000.  Moreover, the concessionaire will have to make other investments totalling
US$7,125,000.00 in the course of the first 10 years.
103. Until the latter part of 2002, there was no specific maritime transport law per se . The
authorities noted the need for this type of legislation and a bill was drafted which led to the GeneralMaritime Port Law, approved by the Legislative Assembly in Decree No. 994, published in Official
Journal No. 187 of 1 October 2002, which entered into force on 1 November 2002.  In October 2002,
the new Law was still in the process of entering into force.  It will regulate everything to do with
maritime navigation and port services.
104. The General Maritime Port Law establishes a Maritime Port Authority ( Autoridad Marítima
Portuaria , AMP), a regulatory body with legal personality and administrative, technical and financial
autonomy, for the technical and economic regulation of the maritime port transport subsector.  The
Law limits the jurisdiction of the Ministries of Public Works and Transport and of Housing and Urban
Development to the formulation of subsectorial maritime port policy, the associated outline planning
and the corresponding implementing regulations.  The AMP is also responsible for representingEl Salvador in international organizations and fo r participating in the negotiation of international
treaties and conventions on ports and maritime issues, in coordination with the competent
departments.  The AMP’s functions also include, inter alia , regulating port charges and establishing
port charge adjustment mechanisms, supervising and monitoring the granting and execution of
national port concession contracts, preventing anticompetitive and discriminatory practices among
users of maritime and port services, and approving all legal documents relating to the transfer,
extension, expiry and buy-back of concessions.
105. The General Maritime Port Law created a Managing Board of the Maritime Port Authority
(Consejo Directivo de la  Autoridad Marítima Portuaria , CDAMP), responsible for formulating
policies, directives and guidelines for the effective exercise of the AMP’s institutional powers.  The
administration of the AMP will be the responsibility of an Executive Manager.  The AMP will be
financed by:  Government contributions;  a percentage, not to exceed 6%, of the income derived fromthe charges for port services provided to ships and cargo in public-use or private ports;  the fees for
services provided by the AMP itself;  the dues collected by the various registries operated by the
AMP;  the proceeds of the fines and economic penalties levied by the AMP;  nonrecurrent receipts;
and any other lawfully obtained income.
106. El Salvador does not have a national merchant fleet, but the new General Maritime Port Law
makes provision for the registration of vessels.  The Law establishes a Salvadoran Maritime Register
(Registro Marítimo Salvadoreño , REMS), an integral part of the AMP, in which vessels and floating
structures and transactions such as buying and selling, building, leasing, chartering and mortgaging
must be registered.  To be registered in the REMS, a vessel must meet certain requirements with
respect to design and seaworthiness;  moreover, its owner must be domiciled in the country or, in the
case of a company, have been established in accordance with the laws of El Salvador, or if established
abroad, have a branch office in El Salvador.  A foreign vessel may be registered in the REMS only if
its registration in the issuing country has previously been cancelled.  The AMP will issue any vessel
or floating structure registered in the REMS a registration certificate conferring Salvadoran
nationality.  To form part of the crew of vessels registered in the REMS or exercise any profession,
office or occupation in the port jurisdiction or in an activity regulated or controlled by the AMP, it is
necessary to obtain the latter’s authorization and have it registered in the REMS.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 98
107. The tariff or price policy for the port services provided by the public ports or public-use
private ports operating in El Salvador will be formulated by the AMP in accordance with the Special
Regulations for the Application of Port Services Tariffs, under which port operators must submit to
the AMP, for its approval, a tariff schedule that includes the tariffs or prices for port services, the
methodology used to calculate them and the way in which these tariffs or prices will be adjusted in the
future.  To prevent cross subsidization, port services operators must implement a system of costaccounting per activity.  The AMP will be able to use several methods of determining tariffs:  tariffs
adjusted on the basis of inflation indices and operational improvements;  tariffs by comparison with
other competing ports;  tariffs based on calculation of the return on investment;  free market.  Port
tariffs approved by the AMP and changes in them must be registered and published in two national
newspapers at least 10 calendar days before they enter into force.
108. The Law provides for the AMP to define the port services that will be deregulated, where the
market is sufficiently competitive.  The Law expressly prohibits any act the intention or result of
which is improperly to restrict competition between ports and port services operators.  It is stipulated
that as long as the country lacks specific legislation in the field of competition policy, the Board of
Directors of the AMP will ensure compliance with the relevant principles as far as maritime and portactivities are concerned.
109. Ports, whether public or private, in operation on the date of entry into force of the Law, are
subject to the AMP’s regulatory regime, where applicable.  The CEPA will be the local maritime port
authority for the State commercial ports under its jurisdiction within which it will be competent for
administration, operation, maintenance and conservation.  At the CEPA’s representation, this
authority will be exercised by the port operator.
110. El Salvador is a signatory to a number of conferences administered by the International
Maritime Organization but not to the United Na tions Convention on a Code of Conduct for Liner
Conferences.  In the field of maritime transport, El Salvador has not made any commitments under the
GATS.
(b) Air transport
111. Air transport policy is the joint responsibility of the Vice-Ministry of Transport, under the
Ministry of Public Works, Housing and Transport, and of the Civil Aviation Authority ( Autoridad de
Aviación Civil , AAC).  CEPA is responsible for air traffic control services.
112. El Salvador has two public airports, the El Salvador International Airport and Ilopango
Airport, which has both military and civilian uses.  The El Salvador International Airport concentrates
all international traffic, both passenger and freight.  The activity indicators for this airport reveal a
significant increase in the number of landings and take-offs, mainly for passenger transport.  Between
1996 and 2000, passenger traffic grew steadily at an average annual rate of 13.4%, reaching about 1.6
million passengers in the year 2000.  The authorities have pointed out that there is capacity for
handling up to 3.5 million passengers a year.  The trend in freight traffic is less clear-cut; there was an
appreciable increase in imports between 1996 and 2000, whereas exports declined (Table IV.11).
113. El Salvador International Airport is administ ered by CEPA, which is responsible for the
management, administration, maintenance and expansion of all airport facilities (see also Section (iv)
(a)).  CEPA is in charge of the handling and storage of goods, but the possibility of contracting the
provision of these services out to a private compan y is being considered.  CEPA is also responsible
for airport security, together with the national civilian police ( Policía Nacional Civil , PNC), whileEl Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 99
private companies supply other services such as cleaning, restaurant services, flight information and
the maintenance of certain areas not connected with airport maintenance.
114. Since 1983, El Salvador International Airport has been the base for operations, reservations,
maintenance and administration of TACA Intern ational Airlines, S.A., a company in which
Salvadorans hold a majority interest.  TACA Intern ational Airlines, S.A. maintains administrative and
operational links with the flag carriers of other Central American countries in which it has acquiredholdings.  TACA International Airlines S.A. is by far the most important airline based in Central
America.  No other company domiciled in El Salvador offers commercial air services.
Table IV.11
Activity indicators for El Salvador International Airport, 1996-00
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Passengers
Arrivals 463,455 482,163 599,111 655,587 634,750
Departures 409,230 426,453 554,917 605,231 621,595
Subtotal 872,685 908,616 1,154,028 1,260,818 1,256,345
Transit passengers 32,095 21,480 26,491 111,349 85,360
Transfer passengers 60,735 30,511 23,006 188,782 256,636
Total 965,515 960,607 1,203,525 1,560,949 1,598,341
Aircrafta
Commercial aviation 22,967 22,093 25,188 27,742 30,796
General aviation 1,124 1,058 1,202 2,124 1,042
National aviation 124 268 302 156 120
Air taxis 102 680 1,402 1,326 68
Total 24,317 24,099 28,094 31,348 32,026
Freight and mail (kg)
Import freight 16,155,915 17,368,915 17,387,583 21,318,441 18,030,674
Export freight 16,510,552 14,350,104 13,792,576 14,651,080 14,437,271
Total freight 32,666,467 31,719,019 31,180,159 35,969,521 32,467,945
Arriving mail .. 227,676 267,028 211,310 223,044
Departing mail .. 92,060 104,747 71,924 103,643
Total mail .. 319,736 371,775 283,234 326,687
Total freight and mail 32,666,467 32,038,755 31,551,934 36,252,755 32,794,632
a Landings and take-offs.
Source : Executive Autonomous Ports Commission.
115. Legislative Decree No. 582 of 19 October 2001 approved the Civil Aviation Organization
Law.  The Law created the Civil Aviation Authority (AAC) and governs everything to do with the
granting of licences, public and private air transport services, ancillary services, and infrastructure.
The functions of the AAC include the regulation, supe rvision and control of all civil aviation activities
relating to the authorization, modification, cancellation and revocation of operators’ certificates and
operating permits, air transit services, aeronautical communications, aeronautical meteorologyservices, aeronautical information services, aerial navigation services and facilities, and the
registration, certification and supervision of aviation personnel, aircraft and other aeronautical
infrastructure.  Moreover, the AAC must ensure th e maintenance of healthy competition in the civil
aviation and air transport sector and guard against monopolistic practices.  Thus, the AAC isWT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 100
responsible for regulating the tariffs for airport, aeronautical, aerial navigation, air transit control and
flight protection services which have monopolistic characteristics and might be exposed to the
exploitation of a dominant position.  The AAC is authorized to impose sanctions for non-compliance
with the rules and regulations applicable to the civil aviation sector.
116. As far as the commitments assumed under GATS are concerned, El Salvador has bound repair
and maintenance services with respect to market access and national treatment for the cross-bordersupply, consumption abroad and commercial presence modes.  In this latter case, El Salvador’s
Schedule of Commitments stipulates that it is necessary to apply to the CEPA for a concession or
licence to provide these services, with the requiremen t that the applicant be domiciled in El Salvador.
The authorities have pointed out that, in the light of the new Civil Aviation Organization Law, a
permit from the AAC is now required and that in recent years permits of this type have been issued.
117. There are no limitations on foreign investment for establishing airlines in El Salvador.
Foreign investors receive national treatment in connection with investment in Salvadoran airlines and
there are no limitations on market access under the commercial presence mode.
118. El Salvador has signed a freedom of the air (fifth and sixth freedoms) agreement with the
United States.
33  It has also signed fourth freedom bilateral agreements with Chile, Spain and the
United Kingdom.34  Licences for landing slots are granted on the reciprocity principle in accordance
with the Chicago Convention.
                                                     
33 Generally speaking, the fifth freedom grants an airline of one country the right to transport freight or
passengers between two third countries provided that the flig ht originates or terminates in the carrier’s flag state.
The sixth freedom grants the right to transport freight or passengers between two third countries via the carrier’s
flag state.
34 In general, the fourth freedom grants an airline of one country the right to transport freight or
passengers from another country to its own flag state.El Salvador WT/TPR/S/111
Page 101
REFERENCES
World Bank, El Salvador:  Country Assistance Evaluation , Washington D.C., 2002.
Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance of El Salvador, National Emergency Committee,  La
Tormenta Tropical Mitch en El Salvador: Efectos, Respuesta y Análisis de las Experiencias
(Hurricane Mitch in El Salvador: Effects, Response and Analysis) , San Salvador, 1999. Economic
Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), El Salvador: Assessment of the
damage caused by Hurricane Mitch, Implications for econom ic and social development,
February 1999.
National Commission for Micro- and Small Enterprises, Características del Sector Microempresarial
Salvadoreño (Characteristics of El Salvador's Small and Micro-Enterprise Sector), 1999 ,
San Salvador, 1999.
WTO, Trade Policy Review of El Salvador , Geneva, 1996.
Centre for Export Requirements, Barreras no arancelarias que limitan el comercio regional
(Non-tariff barriers which restrict regional trade),  Gerencia Internacional (2000).
Permanent Secretariat of the General Treaty on Central American Economic Integration (SIECA),
Medidas Contrarias al Libre Comercio Intraregional (Measures contrary to intra-regional freetrade),  Guatemala, 2 October 2002.
WTO, Trade Policy Review of the Dominican Republic , Geneva, 2002.
WTO, Trade Policy Review of the United States , Geneva, 2001.
National Science and Technology Council (1999), Estadísticas e Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología
(Science and Technology Statistics and Indicators),  1994-1998.  Available on line at:
http://www.conacyt.gob.sv/, 14 July 2002.
International Intellectual Property Alliance, 2002 Special 301 Report on El Salvador .  Available on its
Web site:  http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2002/2002SPEC301ELSALVADOR.pdf.
ECLAC, Istmo Centroamericano: la Regulación de la Distribución de Energía Eléctrica en los
Países con Empresas Privadas: los Casos de El  Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua y Panamá (Central
American Isthmus: Regulation of the Distribution of Electric Power in Countries with Private
Enterprises: the Cases of El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Panama).  Available at the
following address: http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/Mexico/6/LCMEXL536/L536.pdf,
28 August 2002.
Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador, Quarterly Review, October-November-December 2001.Superintendency of the Financial System (2002), Bank Statistical Bulletin.  Available on line at the
following address:  http://www.ssf.gob.sv/.WT/TPR/S/111 Trade Policy Review
Page 102
Lemus Gómez, R. (2000) La industria bancaria en los noventa (The banking industry in the nineties),
Serie de investigación No. 2000-1, FUSADES, 2000.
Superintendency of the Financial System (2002), Bank Statistical Bulletin, April-June 2002.
Available on line at the following address:  http://www.ssf.gob.sv/.