60949 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
Holding Company Report (FR 2320), as 
applicable. 
(ii) If a company does not calculate its 
total consolidated assets under GAAP for any regulatory purpose (including compliance with applicable securities laws), the company may request that the Board permit the company to file a quarterly estimate of its total consolidated assets. The Board may, in 
its discretion and subject to Board review and adjustment, permit the company to provide estimated total consolidated assets on a quarterly basis. For purposes of this part, the company’s total consolidated assets will be the average of the estimated total consolidated assets provided for the assessment period. 
(b) Is a top-tier foreign bank holding 
company on December 31 of the assessment period, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based on the average of the foreign bank holding company’s total consolidated assets reported for the assessment period on the Federal Reserve’s Form FR Y–7Q (‘‘FR Y–7Q’’), provided, however, that if any such company has filed only one FR Y–7Q during the assessment period, the Board shall use an average of the foreign bank holding company’s total consolidated assets reported on that FR Y–7Q and on the FR Y–7Q for the corresponding period in the year prior to the assessment period. 
(c) Is a top-tier foreign savings and 
loan holding company on December 31 of the assessment period, with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as determined based on the average of the foreign savings and loan holding company’s total consolidated assets reported for the assessment period on the reporting forms applicable during the assessment period, provided, however, that if any such company has filed only one reporting form during the assessment period, the Board shall use an average of the foreign savings and loan holding company’s total consolidated assets reported on that reporting form and on the reporting form for the corresponding period in the year prior to the assessment period, or 
(d) Is a nonbank financial company 
supervised by the Board. 
■5. Section 246.4, is amended by 
revising paragraph (c)(1) and adding paragraphs (d)(3) and (4) to read as follows: 
§ 246.4 Assessments. 
* * * * * 
(c) Assessment rates. Assessment 
rates means, with regard to a given assessment period, the two rates published by the Board for the calculation of assessments for Category IV and ‘‘other’’ firms and for Category I, II, and III firms. 
(1)(i) The assessment rate for Category 
IV and ‘‘other’’ firms will be calculated according to this formula: 
[(Net Assessment Basis × Category IV and ‘‘other’’ 
firms’ share of total assessable Assessment rate 
assets of all assessed companies) × (1 ¥ S)] 
Category IV and ‘‘other’’ firms’ total assessable 
assets 
(ii) The assessment rate for Category 
I, II, and III firms will be calculated 
according to this formula: 
Assessment rate = [(Net Assessment Basis × Cat-
egory I, II, and III firms’ share of total assess-
able assets of all assessed companies) + (Net Assessment Basis × Category IV and ‘‘other’’ 
firms’ share of total assessable assets × S)] 
Category I, II, and III firms’ total assessable assets 
* * * * * 
(d) * * * 
(3) Net Assessment Basis is the 
assessment basis, as defined by 
paragraph (d)(2), net of the total $50,000 base amount charged to all assessed companies. Net Assessment Basis = 
assessment basis ¥ (number of assessed 
companies × $50,000). 
(4) The variable S represents the 
estimated share of total costs attributable to changes in supervisory and regulatory responsibilities resulting from EGRRCPA for Category IV and ‘‘other’’ firms. S = 0.1 (10 percent). 
* * * * * 
By order of the Board of Governors of the 
Federal Reserve System, November 5, 2019. 
Ann Misback, Secretary of the Board. 
[FR Doc. 2019–24491 Filed 11–8–19; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 
COMMISSION 
16 CFR Parts 1112, 1130, and 1236 
[CPSC Docket No. 2017–0020] 
Safety Standard for Infant Sleep 
Products 
AGENCY : Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
ACTION : Supplemental notice of 
proposed rulemaking. 
SUMMARY : In the Federal Register of 
April 7, 2017, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (2017 NPR) pursuant to the Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), to promulgate a consumer product safety standard for infant inclined sleep products (inclined sleep products). The 2017 NPR allowed an incline between 10 and 30 degrees for the seat back angle of an inclined sleep product. The 2017 NPR proposed to adopt a voluntary standard for inclined sleep products developed by ASTM International, with a modification to the standard’s definition of ‘‘accessory.’’ Based on subsequent information and events, the Commission is now issuing a supplemental proposed rule (Supplemental NPR), proposing to adopt the current ASTM standard for inclined sleep products, with modifications that would make the mandatory standard more stringent than the voluntary standard. The proposed changes include limiting the seat back angle for sleep to 10 degrees or less. CPSC’s proposed standard would cover products intended for infant sleep that are not already addressed by another standard. Additionally, the Commission proposes to include the mandatory standard for infant sleep products in the Commission’s list of notices of requirements (NORs). The Commission also proposes to amend the consumer registration rule to identify explicitly infant sleep products as a durable infant or toddler product subject to CPSC’s consumer registration requirements. 
DATES : Submit comments by January 27, 
2020. 
ADDRESSES : Comments related to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act aspects of the marking, labeling, and instructional literature requirements of the proposed mandatory standard for infant sleep products should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: CPSC Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 
Other comments, identified by Docket 
No. CPSC–2017–0020, may be submitted electronically or in writing: 
Electronic Submissions: Submit 
electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. CPSC does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov. CPSC encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above. 
Written Submissions: Submit written 
submissions in the following way: Mail/ Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions) to: Division of the Secretariat, Consumer Product 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160950 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
1ASTM International website: www.astm.org, 
About ASTM International. Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the agency name and docket number for this proposed rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: http://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit 
electronically any confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not want to be available to the public. If you wish to provide such information, please submit it in writing. 
Docket: For access to the docket to 
read background documents or comments received, go to: http://www.regulations.gov, and insert the 
docket number, CPSC–2017–0020, into the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Celestine T. Kish, Project Manager, Directorate for Engineering, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850; telephone: (301) 987–2547; email: ckish@cpsc.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Background and Statutory Authority 
A. Statutory Authority 
Section 104(b) of the CPSIA, 15 U.S.C. 
2056a(b), requires the Commission to: 
(1) Examine and assess the effectiveness of voluntary consumer product safety standards for durable infant or toddler products, in consultation with representatives of consumer groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and independent child product engineers and experts; and (2) promulgate consumer product safety standards for durable infant or toddler products. Standards issued under section 104 are to be ‘‘substantially the same as’’ the applicable voluntary standards, or more stringent than the voluntary standard if the Commission concludes that more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of injury associated with the product. 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(1)(B). 
Section 104 of the CPSIA requires the 
Commission to consult with representatives of consumer groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and independent child product engineers and experts to examine and assess the effectiveness of the relevant voluntary standards. CPSC staff regularly participates in the juvenile products subcommittee meetings of ASTM International (ASTM). ASTM subcommittees consist of members who represent producers, users, consumers, 
government, and academia.
1The 
consultation process for the inclined sleep products rulemaking commenced in 2011, and CPSC staff has been actively participating in the development of the new standard since that time. 
A ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ 
is a ‘‘durable product intended for use, or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children under the age of 5 years.’’ Id. 2056a(f)(1). The CPSIA 
includes a non-exhaustive list of categories of products that are durable infant or toddler products, such as cribs, toddler beds, and bassinets and cradles. Id. 2056a(f)(2). As discussed in section 
I.B of this preamble, in the 2017 NPR CPSC proposed to categorize infant inclined sleep products as a ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ under section 104 of the CPSIA, as a subset of the bassinet and cradle category. In this Supplemental NPR, CPSC proposes to identify ‘‘infant sleep products’’ as a category of durable infant or toddler products under section 104(f) of the CPSIA. CPSC proposes to define ‘‘infant 
sleep products’’ as products that provide sleeping accommodations for infants and are not currently covered by bassinets/cradles, cribs (full-size and non-full size), play yards, and bedside sleepers, as a durable infant or toddler product under section 104(f) of the CPSIA. Section 104(d) of the CPSIA requires durable infant or toddler products to establish product registration programs and comply with CPSC’s implementing rule, 16 CFR part 1130. Under section 14 of the CPSA, children’s products (such as durable infant or toddler products) must comply with testing and certification requirements that are implemented through 16 CFR parts 1107 and 1109. 
B. 2017 NPR 
When staff began work on the bassinet 
and cradle standard, staff considered 
infant inclined sleep products to fall within the scope of the bassinet/cradle standard. However, because the bassinet/cradle standard did not address products on the market that had a sleep incline greater than 10 degrees, the Commission directed staff to initiate a separate rulemaking effort for infant inclined sleep products. Accordingly, the infant inclined sleep products safety standard was an outgrowth of the bassinet/cradle safety standard, intended to address products with an incline greater than 10 degrees from horizontal. In 2011, at the time CPSC separated 
infant inclined sleep products from the bassinet/cradle standard, ASTM simultaneously began work on developing a voluntary standard for infant inclined sleep products. ASTM published the resulting infant inclined sleep products standard in May 2015, and updated the standard twice in 2016 and twice in 2017. ASTM’s latest standard for this product category is designated, ASTM F3118–17a, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Inclined Sleep Products (ASTM F3118–17a). 
Pursuant to the procedure described 
in section 104 of the CPSIA, the 2017 NPR proposed a mandatory standard for infant inclined sleep products, incorporating by reference the then- current voluntary standard, ASTM F3118–17, with a modification to the standard’s definition of ‘‘accessory.’’ 82 FR 16964 (April 7, 2017). At the time of the 2017 NPR for infant inclined sleep products, which included hammocks, the Commission was aware of 14 fatal incidents related to infant inclined sleep products, which were reported to have occurred between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2016. Staff determined that 8 of the 14 infant deaths involved freestanding, framed inclined sleep products, and that 3 infant deaths involved an unrestrained infant who was found to have rolled over into a facedown position. Staff found that in two additional deaths, the infant reportedly rolled over into a facedown position, but the reports did not include any information about use of a restraint. CPSC staff had little information about the cause or manner of the three remaining infant deaths. Id. at 16965– 
66. Staff’s incident data analysis in the 2017 NPR considered that these 14 fatalities and other reported incidents could be addressed by the requirements in the voluntary standard, ASTM F3118–17. Id. at 16967–68. 
The 2017 NPR indicated that ASTM 
F3118–17 addressed the primary hazard patterns CPSC identified in the 657 incidents (including 14 deaths), except for the definition of ‘‘accessory.’’ Specifically, the 2017 NPR proposed that CPSC’s standard would not include the term ‘‘rigid frame’’ in the definition of ‘‘accessory inclined sleep product’’ in section 3.1.1 of ASTM F3118–17, broadening the definition to encompass a new product that did not have a rigid frame. Id. at 16968–69, and 16975. The 
Commission concluded that these more stringent requirements were necessary to further reduce the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products relating to the use of an 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160951 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
2The October 16, 2019, Staff Briefing Package: 
Draft Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
for Infant Sleep Products under the Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act (Staff Supplemental Briefing Package) is available at: https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/ SupplementalNoticeofProposedRulemakingforInfantSleepProducts _10_16_2019.pdf?
TPVAJZEQcz9x9sKeEGltm4LskkonxUWv. 3This would include marketing information 
(such as on websites or in ad campaigns), product 
and retail package labeling, as well as supplier statements about the product. 
4These include: Safety Standard for Full-Size 
Baby Cribs (16 CFR 1219); Safety Standard for Non- Full-Size Baby Cribs and Ply Yards (16 CFR 1220 and 1221); Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers (16 CFR 1222); and Safety Standard for Bassinets and 
Cradles (16 CFR 1218). inclined sleep product accessory. Id. at 
16967. 
As the 2017 NPR explained, durable 
infant or toddler products are children’s 
products that must be certified as complying with all applicable CPSC- enforced requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a); 82 FR at 16969. Certification must be based on testing conducted by a CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body (test laboratory). 15 U.S.C. 20163(a)(2). CPSC must publish a NOR for the accreditation of test laboratories to assess a product’s conformity with a children’s product safety rule, such as the proposed rule on infant inclined sleep products. Accordingly, the 2017 NPR proposed that if issued as a final rule, the new Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Inclined Sleep Products, to be codified at 16 CFR part 
1236, would be added to the list of 
NORs for children’s product safety rules in 16 CFR part 1112, so that test laboratories applying for CPSC- acceptance could seek accreditation to test inclined infant sleep products. 82 FR at 16969. 
Finally, the 2017 NPR proposed to 
amend 16 CFR part 1130, the Commission’s requirements for consumer registration for durable infant or toddler products. Id. at 16969–70. 
The Commission proposed to amend the definition of ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ to clarify that infant inclined sleep products fall within the term, and are subject to the product registration card requirements in part 1130. Id. 
On June 12, 2019, CPSC staff 
submitted a briefing package and a draft Federal Register notice to the Commission recommending that the Commission terminate the 2017 NPR. Staff recommended terminating the 2017 NPR because, by that time, CPSC had received reports of 42 additional fatalities since issuing the 2017 NPR, which were associated with rocker-like inclined sleep products, and because the Commission had issued additional safety alerts and recalls involving infant inclined sleep products. On October 16, 2019, staff provided the Commission with a briefing package recommending that the Commission instead issue this Supplemental NPR.
2 C. 2019 Supplemental NPR—Overview 
In this Supplemental NPR, the 
Commission proposes to issue a 
standard for infant sleep products, i.e., products that (1) Provide sleeping accommodations for infants and (2) are not currently covered by bassinets/ cradles, cribs (full-size and non-full size), play yards, and bedside sleepers. The Supplemental NPR proposes to incorporate by reference ASTM F 3118– 17a with modifications to require that: (1) The seat back angle intended for sleep must be equal to or less than 10° and (2) the infant sleep product must meet the requirements for a bassinet/ cradle in the standard at 16 CFR part 1218. The Commission also proposes to amend the consumer registration rule to identify ‘‘infant sleep products’’ as a category of durable infant or toddler products under section 104(f) of the CPSIA. Additionally, the Commission proposes to amend its regulation at 16 CFR part 1112 to add infant sleep products to the list of products that require third party testing. 
II. Product Description A. Scope of Products Within the 
Supplemental NPR 
The scope of products covered by the 
2017 NPR tracked the scope of ASTM F3118–17, covering ‘‘a free standing product with an inclined sleep surface primarily intended and marketed to provide sleeping accommodations for an infant up to 5 months old or when the 
infant begins to roll over or pull up on sides, whichever comes first.’’ The Supplemental NPR proposes to incorporate ASTM F3118–17a with substantial modifications, including revisions in the scope of the standard, section 1.3, to remove the term ‘‘inclined,’’ and to include any infant sleep product not currently covered by another mandatory rule for infant sleep products: Bassinets/cradles, cribs (full- size and non-full-size), play yards, and bedside sleepers. Accordingly, the scope of the Supplemental NPR includes all of the products in the 2017 NPR, plus additional infant sleep products not covered by any other infant sleep product standard. The following types of infant sleep products fall within the scope of the Supplemental NPR: 
•Frame-Type Inclined Sleep 
Products—Frame-type inclined sleep products are elevated, intended to be placed on the floor, and are self- supporting. Typically, this design uses a metal frame covered by a fabric insert that contains the occupant. Some frame- type products have a rigid plastic insert under the sleeping surface, and/or extra padding with head positioning cushions. The base may be stationary or 
allow side-to-side/head-to-toe rocking. This type of product could have a fixed incline or be adjustable. Frame-type products can be intended for use by newborns or infants, or both, depending on the size of the product. 
•Hammocks—Hammocks are 
typically constructed of fabric and suspended from one or two points, either above or on either side. Hammock products are constructed of various materials and generally conform to the shape of the child when placed in the product. However, some hammock designs use a mat, mattress, or other type of pad to provide a semi-rigid sleeping surface that maintains the product’s form. Hammocks are intended to be suspended and can be supported by a frame or other structure, such as a ceiling. 
•Compact Inclined Sleep Products— 
Compact inclined sleep products are freestanding, with the bottom of the seat a maximum of 6 inches (152 mm) above the floor. These products tend to be constructed of foam and are intended to be used on the floor. 
•Accessory Inclined Sleep 
Products—An accessory inclined sleep product is intended to provide sleeping accommodations for infants or newborns and are attached to, or supported in some way, by another product. These products can be fixed or adjustable. An inclined sleep accessory is typically a rigid-frame product that has a stationary or fixed base and, in some cases, inclined sleep product accessories may be removed and used independently. 
B. Market Description 
The Supplemental NPR proposes to 
cover any infant product ‘‘primarily 
intended and marketed
3to provide 
sleeping accommodations’’ that is designed for infants five months old or younger and that is not covered by another standard.
4In general, the 
Supplemental NPR does not propose to cover products with adjustable seat back positions that are covered by other mandatory or voluntary standards in inclined position(s), such as bouncers, rockers, hand-held carriers, or infant swings, unless they have a seat back angle that is specifically marketed for sleep for children 5 months or younger. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160952 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
5The average price for an infant hammock 
supplied by a home-based manufacturer is 
approximately $200. 
6Staff averaged prices across all models found for 
a particular type. Staff ignored as unknown shipping costs for a few hammock models delivered from overseas suppliers, which means that the average cost for an infant hammock may be a low estimate, depending upon how many hammocks are 
entering the U.S. via these overseas suppliers. To date, CPSC staff has found one 
bouncer on the market with an inclined position marketed for sleep for children in this age range. 
Inclined infant sleep products sell on 
the U.S. market for approximately $65 for a frame-style inclined sleeper, $110 for a compact sleeper, $165 for an infant hammock,
5and $236 for a play yard 
with an inclined sleeper accessory.6A 
hammock-style crib accessory that would be covered by the Supplemental NPR (but does not currently fall under the voluntary inclined sleeper standard or another sleep standard) sells for approximately $50. 
Several product categories would not 
fall under the scope of the Supplemental NPR: (1) Sleep positioners; (2) sleep wedges, many of which are marketed as medical devices, putting them under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration; and (3) miniature infant hammocks marketed exclusively for use as photographic props (i.e., photos of 
newborn babies). 
III. Incident Data and Hazard Patterns 
At the time of the 2017 NPR, the 
Commission was aware of 14 fatal 
incidents related to infant inclined sleep products, which were reported to have occurred between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2016. Eight of the 14 deaths involved rocker-like inclined sleep products; in three cases, the unstrapped decedent was found to have rolled over into a facedown position. Two additional cases also reported a rollover into a facedown position, but the reports did not include any information about use of a restraint. CPSC had little information about the cause or manner of the three remaining deaths. The NPR recognized that reporting was ongoing and the number of reported fatalities could change. This Supplemental NPR updates fatal and nonfatal incident reports associated with the use of an infant inclined sleep product. 
CPSC is aware of 451 incidents (59 
fatal and 392 nonfatal) related to infant inclined sleep products that occurred from January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2019 and reported between October 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019. This count includes incidents reported after the reporting end date stated in the 2017 NPR. Forty-three percent of the incident 
reports (196 out of 451) are based solely on information from manufacturers/ retailers. Various sources, such as hotlines, internet reports, newspaper clippings, medical examiners, and other state/local authorities provided the remaining incident reports to CPSC. Reporting is ongoing, and therefore, the number of reported fatalities, nonfatal injuries, and non-injury incidents may change in the future. Tab A of the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package describes the incident data and the hazard patterns associated infant inclined sleep products. 
A. Fatalities 
Since the 2017 NPR, through June 30, 
2019, CPSC received reports of 59 
deaths. One fatality involved a foam- based infant reclined sleeper; two fatalities occurred in napper attachments of play yards; and the remaining fatalities occurred in freestanding framed inclined sleep products. CPSC staff reviewed and categorized incident reports associated with the fatalities: 
•Twenty-eight of the 59 reports 
contain unclear, conflicting, and/or inconsistent information. For example, in this category medical examiners often conclude the cause of death to be Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) along with a co-contributing condition such as unsafe sleep environment (e.g., soft bedding, inclined 
sleep surface) or other pre-existing medical condition. Considering all factors in each report confounds staff’s ability to determine the pre-dominant factor causing a fatality. Occasionally, wording on the documents cite ‘‘several possibilities’’ and the cause of death is coded as Undetermined. Lack of clarity in these reports make it difficult for CPSC staff to consistently classify the 28 deaths. 
•Eighteen reports describe infants 
placed in the product supine but who ended up in a compromised position in the product, resulting in suffocations or positional asphyxiations. In 11 of the 18 cases, no restraints were used; another six infants were placed in a supine position, but the use of restraints is unknown; and in one case, the infant was left restrained and supine, but found supine, slumped in a chin-to- chest position. One additional unrestrained infant fell out of the product and became wedged in a confined space. 
•Eight reports provide very little 
information on the incidents. Lack of any information on the circumstances leading up to the death does not allow staff to classify these deaths. 
•Four reports describe infant 
placement issues; three of the four decedents were reportedly placed prone on soft bedding in the product; and another decedent suffocated when a young sibling climbed into the sleep product on top of her. 
CPSC does not know the age for 10 
deceased infants. Staff concludes that for the remaining deaths, 39 infants were 5 months or less in age, while six infants were between 6- and 8-months of age. One decedent was 9-months old. 
B. Nonfatal Incidents 
Reports indicate that 96 of the 451 
inclined sleep product-related nonfatal 
incidents involved an injury to the infant during product use. The severity of the injury types among the 96 reported injuries are as follows: 
D Seven infants required hospital 
admission. Six of the seven infants suffered episodes of respiratory distress due to rolling over in the product; mold in the product; or undetermined reasons. One of the seven infants had to be hospitalized for scoliosis (curvature) 
of the back attributed to product use. 
D Sixteen infants were treated and 
released from emergency departments (EDs). Eleven of these infants were treated for head injuries and contusions/ bruises resulting from falls; three infants were treated for unexplained respiratory distress. Mold growth on the product was associated with respiratory distress in one additional infant and seizure symptoms in another. 
D Seventy-three infants received some 
professional medical care, first-aid treatment, or the level of care received was not reported. Among them, 32 infants suffered from plagiocephaly (flat head syndrome), torticollis (twisted neck syndrome), or both conditions, associated with the use of the inclined sleep product; 27 infants suffered mostly respiratory and some skin problems associated with mold on the product; infants sustained the remaining injuries due to a fall from the product or a minor electric shock, or their injuries are unspecified. 
The remaining 296 incident reports 
indicate that no injury occurred to the infant or provided no information about an injury. However, many of the descriptions indicate the potential for a serious injury, or even death, similar to those reported in the incident data. 
C. Hazard Pattern Identification 
The 2017 NPR identified nine hazard 
patterns among the 657 reported 
incidents. These hazard patterns included: Design issues, lack of 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160953 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
structural integrity, inadequate 
restraints, electrical issues, non- product-related or unknown issues, difficulty with correct positioning, miscellaneous product-related issues, unspecified falls, and consumer comments. Although the distribution of the data in this Supplemental NPR update varied somewhat, CPSC finds that the broader hazard categories are very similar. Within the broader hazard category of design, the Supplemental NPR identifies one new hazard pattern, as described below. 
CPSC staff considered all 451 reported 
incidents (59 fatal and 392 nonfatal) to identify hazard patterns associated with infant inclined sleep products. The infant inclined sleep products category includes a variety of products. Some products, like hammocks, are suspended in air, while other seat-like products are meant to be placed on a floor level (yet incident reports indicate these products often were not placed on floor level). Other products sit on top of larger nursery products as attachments. CPSC staff identified hazard patterns that are quite different depending on which product is involved and how the product is being used. In order of frequency of incident reports, CPSC staff grouped the hazard patterns into the following categories: 
1. Design of the infant inclined sleep 
product: One hundred and thirty-eight 
of the 451 reported incidents (31 percent) are in this category. Staff identified three major issues: 
a. Fifty-nine reported incidents (43 
percent) involved infants who developed respiratory and/or skin ailments due to the growth of mold on the product; 
b. Forty-six reported incidents (33 
percent) involved infants that rolled over—fully or partially—from their original supine position. Reports describe infants as young as 1- or 2- months of age as having rolled over; parents/caregivers, who witnessed and reported some of the nonfatal incidents, were able to rescue distressed infants quickly. Eighteen infants died due to suffocation or asphyxiation. Although a few of the infants were strapped into the product, a majority of the infants were either not restrained or the use of restraint is unreported. 
c. Thirty-three reported incidents (24 
percent) involved infants that developed physical deformations from extended product use, such as plagiocephaly (flat 
head syndrome), scoliosis (curvature) of 
the back, and/or torticollis (twisted neck 
syndrome). 
The design category includes 19 
deaths, 5 hospitalizations, and 4 emergency department (ED) visits. All but two of the deaths resulted from infants rolling over into a prone or semi- prone position, one decedent was found still supine and restrains, but slumped in a chin-to-chest position. The other infant rolled out of the product and wedged into a confined space. Infants unrestrained in the product caused two ED-treated falls. An additional 62 non- hospitalized, non-ED injuries are reported in this category. 
2. Electrical issues: One hundred and 
twenty-seven of the 451 incident reports (28 percent) report battery leakage, electric shock, and/or overheating/ melting of components, such as the vibrating unit, battery cover, switch, plug, or motor. Reports include two injuries in this category due to electric shock. 
3. Consumer comments: Ninety of the 
451 reports (20 percent) fall into this category. The reports consist of consumer comments/observations of perceived safety hazards, complaints about unauthorized sale of infant inclined sleep products, or inquiries regarding safety recall on inclined sleep products. One complaint describes misinformation in the instruction material. None of these reports indicate that an incident actually occurred. 
4. Undetermined due to confounding 
information: Thirty-four of the 451 
reports (8 percent) provide unclear, conflicting, and/or inconsistent information. Among the 28 deaths reported in this category, for example, medical examiners often concluded the cause of death to be SIDS or SUID, along with a co-contributing condition such as an unsafe sleep environment (e.g., soft 
bedding, inclined sleep surface) or pre- existing medical condition. Staff is unable to determine the role of the product when documents describe multiple potentially contributing factors. Occasionally, the wording on the documents cite ‘‘several possibilities,’’ and the cause of death is coded as Undetermined. For the 6 nonfatal injuries, including the 2 hospitalized and 2 ED-treated injuries, the report described respiratory distress due to temporary cessation of breathing; however, these reports contain no official diagnosis for these episodes. 
5. Lack of structural integrity: Twenty- 
eight of the 451 incidents (6 percent) report some sort of breakage of the product or its components. These reports include complaints of buckle/ straps breaking, components such as hub, rail, or leg detaching/disengaging, hardware coming loose, and other unspecified components breaking. This category includes two ED-treated injuries, both due to falls. 6. Other product-related issues: 
Thirteen of the 451 incidents (3 percent) 
report other product-related issues, such as instability (product tipping over), inadequacy of restraint (infants falling out in spite of being restrained), or product assembly/installation difficulties. This category contains seven fall-related injuries, including two injuries that were treated and released from a hospital ED. 
7. Infant placement issues: Four of the 
451 incidents reports (1 percent) indicate that infant placement contributed to the incident. Of the four fatalities, reports describe three infants placed in a prone position on soft bedding; and another infant being crushed by a young sibling who climbed on top of her. 
8. Insufficient information: For 17 of 
the 451 incidents (4 percent), reports contain insufficient information for staff to categorize them accurately. Staff has no information available on the circumstances of 8 deaths in this category. Reports for six injuries in this category describe unspecified falls treated in hospital EDs, with no information was on restraint usage. 
D. Product Recalls and Safety Alerts 
From May 10, 2000 to August 20, 
2019, CPSC conducted 13 consumer- 
level recalls involving infant inclined sleep products. The recalls were conducted in response to hazards involving strangulation, suffocation, fall, structural stability, entrapment, exposure to mold, and death. Six recalls involved infant hammocks, six recalls involved infant inclined sleep products, and one recall involved an infant inclined sleep accessory included with a play yard. Tab G in the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package contains a detailed chart outlining recalls involving infant inclined sleep products. 
The six infant hammocks were 
recalled for hazards including: Strangulation, suffocation, fall, structural stability, and entrapment. Recalls affected approximately 25,400 units of infant hammocks. 
The six infant inclined sleep products 
and one infant inclined sleep accessory included with a play yard were recalled due to hazards including: entrapment, suffocation, fall, exposure to mold, and death after infants rolled from their back to their stomach or side while unrestrained in the products. Recalls affected approximately 6.4 million units of infant inclined sleep products. One recall for exposure to mold affected 800,000 units, and two recalls for entrapment and suffocation affected 195,000 units. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160954 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
7https://www.cpsc.gov/content/cpsc-consumer- 
alert-caregivers-urged-to-use-restraints-with- 
inclined-sleep-products. 
8https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News- 
Releases/2019/CPSC–ALERT–CPSC-and-Fisher- Price-Warn-Consumers-About-Fisher-Price-Rock-N- Play-Due-to-Reports-of-Death-When-Infants-Roll- Over-in-the-Product. In 2019, two recalls occurred due to 
reports of infant deaths while using 
infant inclined sleep products, after the infants rolled from their back to their stomach or side while unrestrained, or under other circumstances. In response to the reported deaths in those products, CPSC conducted two additional recalls due to safety concerns with infant inclined sleep products, one with an 
infant inclined sleep product, and one with an infant inclined sleep accessory included with a play yard. Recalls involving infant inclined sleep products affected approximately 5.4 million units and the recall involving the infant inclined sleep accessory affected approximately 71,000 units. 
The Commission also has issued two 
safety alerts involving infant inclined sleep products. A May 31, 2018 safety alert
7advised of infant rollover deaths 
in inclined sleep products, and reminded caregivers to always use restraints and to stop using the product as soon as an infant can roll over. An April 5, 2019 safety alert
8advised 
consumers to stop use of the inclined sleep product when an infant reaches three months of age, or as soon as an infant exhibits rollover capabilities. 
IV. Mannen Study 
During the development of this 
Supplemental NPR briefing package, 
staff received reports of 451 new incidents, 59 of which were deaths that occurred while in infant inclined sleep products. Accordingly, Commission staff contracted with Dr. Erin Mannen, Ph.D., a mechanical engineer with a biomechanics specialization, to conduct infant testing to evaluate the design of inclined sleep products. Tab B of the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package contains Dr. Mannen’s study, Biomechanical Analysis of Inclined Sleep (Mannen Study). 
The Mannen Study examined how 10 
infants move and use their muscles on flat, inclined surfaces, and in selected inclined sleep products, and whether such product designs directly impact safety or present a risk factor that could contribute to the suffocation of an infant. Testing compared infants’ muscle movement and oxygen saturation on a flat crib mattress at 0°, 10°, and 20° versus seven different 
inclined sleep products. Researchers recorded infant muscle activity using surface electromyography (EMG), and recorded oxygen saturation using a medical grade pulse oximeter. Researchers placed infants in a random order in each of the 10 testing conditions, in both the supine and prone positions, for at least 60 seconds (unless the oximeter data fell below 95%, in which case they were removed early to ensure safety). 
Following are key findings of the 
Mannen Study: 
•Inclined surfaces and incline sleep 
products resulted in significantly higher muscle activity of the turn core muscle (abdominals), which may lead to quicker fatigue and suffocation if an infant finds themselves prone in an incline sleep product. 
•Muscle synergies (i.e., how muscles 
work together) are significantly different in inclined sleep products. If an infant rolls from supine to prone in an inclined sleep product, it is likely the first time the baby has experienced the position and the demands the position requires of the muscles. 
•Some inclined sleep products 
require greater neck and trunk adjustments during prone positioning, indicating that infants may struggle to adjust their posture to enable breathing and attempt to self-correct if a roll from supine to prone occurs. 
•Prone lying in the incline sleep 
products puts infant at higher risk of suffocation as evidenced by oxygen saturation results. 
•Some evidence was found that 
supports the idea that the inclined sleep products make the babies roll more easily from supine to prone. The flexed trunk and ease of head lifting during supine lying in an inclined sleep product may indicate that supine to prone rolling is achieved more easily. 
•If babies roll from supine to prone 
in an inclined sleep product, then, due to the high musculoskeletal demands necessary to maintain safe posture to prevent suffocation, babies would fatigue faster than they would on a stable, flat surface. 
•None of the inclined sleep products 
that were tested and evaluated as a part of this study are safe for infant sleep. 
Additionally, the Mannen Study 
concludes: 
•20-Degree Incline Puts Infants at 
Risk for Muscle Fatigue and Suffocation: Based on the results of the biomechanical study, the 20-degree incline resulted in significantly different muscle activity for the infants compared to the zero-degree incline surface. The increased demand on the abdominal muscles could lead to increased fatigue and suffocation if an infant is unable to reposition themselves after an accidental roll from supine to prone 
occurs. 
•10-Degree Incline Does Not 
Significantly Impact Infant Motion or Muscle Activity: Based on the results of the biomechanical study, fewer differences in muscle activity or lying posture were revealed at a 10-degree mattress incline compared to the zero- degree incline surface. Ten degrees is a safe incline for sleep on a crib mattress surface. 
•Inclines Between 10 and 20 Degrees 
Should Be More Thoroughly Studied: The experimental design of this study did not examine the angles between 10 and 20 degrees, so future work should focus on understanding which, if any, angles between 10 and 20 degrees may be safe for infant sleep. 
The Mannen Study further states: ‘‘It 
is likely that in incidents where babies were found deceased in the prone position, that an accidental roll occurred, and after some amount of struggling, the baby was fatigued and could no longer move into a position to prevent suffocation.’’ Dr. Mannen concludes that an incline of 20 degrees or more puts an infant at risk compared to a 0–10 degree incline. Although her study did not test infants on inclines 
between 10–20 degrees, and thus did not offer conclusions for these angles, CPSC staff advises that additional testing on inclines between 10–20 degrees is unnecessary, because staff concludes that a flat surface that does not exceed 10 degrees offers the safest sleep environment for infants. This conclusion comports with staff’s recommendations to remove the term ‘‘inclined’’ from the proposed mandatory standard, and to require that all sleep products not otherwise specified as cribs (full-size or non-full- size), play yards, or bedside sleepers meet the requirements in 16 CFR 1218 Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles, which, among other requirements, mandates that the seat back surface angle intended for sleep be 10 degrees or less. 
V. International Standards for Inclined 
Sleep Products 
The 2017 NPR described international 
standards that include infant inclined sleep products within their scope, noting that these standards are intended primarily to address hazards associated with products having flat sleeping surfaces, such as bassinets and cradles. These standards include: 
D The Cribs, Cradles, and Bassinets 
regulation included in the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act: The Canadian regulation has similar requirements to ASTM F3118, such as 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160955 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
warnings, labels, and general 
performance requirements (e.g. lead 
content, small parts, openings). The Canadian regulation has additional requirements for slat strength, mesh material, structural integrity, and mattress supports. CPSC staff determined that the Canadian regulation provides similar performance requirements as ASTM F3118, but contains a more stringent requirement limiting the sleep seat back angle to 7° or less. However, the Canadian regulation allows a product to be marketed as a ‘‘napper,’’ which the Supplemental NPR proposes not to allow. 
D The European standard (SS–EN 
1130: Furniture, Cribs, and Cradles Safety Requirements): EN 1130 covers only inclined sleep products with a body and frame. The European standard would not include hammocks or similar products that are suspended from ceilings or other structures. EN 1130 includes requirements for construction and materials similar to the general ASTM F3118 requirements. Additional requirements include labeling, use instructions, packaging, and stability. EN 1130 is intended primarily to address hazards associated with bassinets and cradles and not the unique hazards associated with inclined sleep products. CPSC staff believes the ASTM standard is more inclusive because it includes all hammock styles. Additionally, EN 1130 does not address the hazards identified in the Mannen Study. 
D The Australian standard (AS/NZS 
4385 Infants’ rocking cradles—Safety requirements): AS/NZS 4385 is 
intended for rocking cradles that swing, rock, or tilt, but specifically excludes hammocks that do not have this feature. Staff is unclear whether tilt means incline, thereby including in the Australian standard inclined sleep products as defined in ASTM F3118. AS/NZS 4385 contains requirements for construction, toxicology, and flammability, as well as general provisions, such as those for included toys. AS/NZS 4385 has some similar performance requirements as ASTM F3118, but is not as comprehensive. Additionally, the AS/NZS 4385 does not address the hazards identified in the Mannen Study. 
VI. Voluntary Standard—ASTM F3118 A. History of ASTM F3118 
Section 104(b)(1)(A) of the CPSIA 
requires the Commission to consult 
representatives of ‘‘consumer groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and independent child product engineers and experts’’ to ‘‘examine and assess the 
effectiveness of any voluntary consumer product safety standards for durable infant or toddler products.’’ As a result of incidents arising from inclined sleep products, the Commission directed CPSC staff to work with ASTM to develop voluntary requirements to address the hazard patterns related to the use of inclined sleep products. ASTM first approved ASTM F3118 on April 1, 2015, and published it in May 2015. Through the ASTM process, CPSC staff consulted with manufacturers, retailers, trade organizations, laboratories, consumer advocacy groups, consultants, and members of the public. The current standard, ASTM F3118– 17a, was approved on September 1, 2017, and published in October of 2017. This is the fourth revision to the standard since it was first published in May 2015. ASTM F3118–17a is intended to address the following hazards: (1) Falls, (2) positional 
asphyxiation, and (3) obstruction of 
nose and mouth by bedding. 
B. Description of the Current Voluntary 
Standard—ASTM F3118–17a 
The 2017 NPR described the key 
provisions of ASTM F3118–17, including: scope, terminology, general requirements, performance requirements, test methods, marking and labeling, and instructional literature. 82 FR at 16967. The Supplemental NPR proposes to incorporate by reference the most recent version of the voluntary standard, ASTM F3118–17a, which is substantially the same as ASTM F3118– 17, except that the accessory definition was updated to match the modification 
recommended in the 2017 NPR. Like the previous version, ASTM F3118–17a describes the scope of the voluntary standard, defines terms for various types of inclined sleep products, and sets out requirements for performance (such as for structural integrity and stability) and for warnings and instructions. As discussed elsewhere in this preamble, CPSC’s proposed standard would make substantial modifications to ASTM F3118–17a. 
VII. Assessment of the Voluntary 
Standard ASTM F3118–17a 
In the 2017 NPR, CPSC proposed that 
incorporating by reference ASTM F3118–17, with a modification to the definition of ‘‘accessory,’’ would address the primary hazard patterns identified in the incident data. 82 FR at 16967–68. However, since the 2017 NPR, CPSC has become aware of additional fatalities and contracted the Mannen Study. The Mannen Study and more recent incident data indicate that ASTM F3118–17a is not adequate to address the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products because the standard allows for products with a seat back angle greater than 10 degrees. The Commission finds that more stringent requirements than those found in ASTM F3118–17a are necessary in a mandatory rule to further reduce the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products. 
Following is an explanation of how 
the Supplemental NPR would address the product-related hazard patterns identified in section III.C of this preamble, discussing the proposed more stringent requirements where appropriate. 
A. Design Problems 1. Suffocation Hazard 
The Mannen Study results reveal that 
a 20° incline results in significantly 
different muscle activity for the infants 
compared to a 0° incline surface. The 
increased demand on infant abdominal muscles could lead to increased fatigue and suffocation if an infant is unable to reposition themselves after a roll from supine to prone occurs. At a 10° incline, 
fewer differences in muscle activity or lying posture were revealed compared to the 0° incline surface. According to 
Dr. Mannen’s report, ‘‘ten degrees is likely a safe incline for sleep on a crib mattress surface.’’ Accordingly, the Commission proposes modifications to the introduction, scope, definitions, and performance requirements in ASTM F3118–17a, as described in section VIII of this preamble, to address the potential hazards of an infant sleeping on an inclined surface. Although her study did not test infants on inclines between 10°–20°, and thus did not offer conclusions for these angles, CPSC staff advises that additional testing on inclines between 10°–20° is 
unnecessary, concluding that a flat surface that does not exceed 10° offers 
the safest sleep environment for infants and would further reduce the risk of injury associated with inclined sleep products. 
2. Additional Design Issues 
CPSC staff identified two additional 
design issues: (1) Infant respiratory and/ 
or skin ailments due to mold growth on the product, and (2) infant physical deformations such as plagiocephaly (flat 
head syndrome) and/or torticollis (twisted neck syndrome) from extended product use. In the reported cases of mold that resulted in respiratory problems for infants using the product, all cases were related to one particular 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160956 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
manufacturer’s inclined sleep product. 
CPSC conducted a recall of that product in 2013. Infants who use an inclined sleep product that is known to develop visible mold can be at risk of developing health effects such as allergies, asthma, mycosis, and effects of mycotoxins. However, because the mold growth was restricted to one manufacturer’s product and that product was recalled, the Commission is not proposing any modifications to address potential hazards associated with mold. 
Plagiocephaly, cranial deformity or 
asymmetry (commonly known as flat head) is a condition that may exist at birth due to mechanical constraint of fetal head movement in the womb, birth-related injuries during assisted delivery, or as a result of increased likelihood of skull deformity as a consequence of premature birth. Muscular torticollis (twisted neck) is a known risk factor associated with plagiocephaly caused by constraint of head and neck movement. Although incident data indicate that consumers believe use of an inclined sleep product is the cause for their child’s plagiocephaly/torticollis, no evidence supports this belief. Increase in the number of children with plagiocephaly may actually be attributed to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ (AAP) recommendation to place infants to sleep on their backs to decrease the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Because the development of plagiocephaly and torticollis is not exclusively attributable to the use of infant inclined sleep products, the conditions are not addressable with performance standards. The Commission is not proposing any modifications to the voluntary standard to address these issues. Tab E of the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package provides the Directorate for Health Science’s analysis of plagiocephaly and torticollis related to infant sleep products. 
B. Electrical Issues 
Staff determined that 127 of the 451 
new incidents are related to electrical 
issues. The electrical-related issues included battery leakage, electric shock, 
and overheating of components. Some inclined sleep products have accessories that provide music, rocking motion, or vibration, which are either battery- or a/ c-powered; however, F3118–17a does not include any performance requirements for electrical components. Other juvenile products that have similar features include performance requirements that could apply for infant sleep products. CPSC staff has raised this issue and is working with the ASTM Ad Hoc task group to develop 
performance requirements to address electrical hazards across juvenile products. Performance requirements would apply to other children’s product standards, such as bouncers, swings, and bassinets. Because these requirements are currently under development, the Commission is not proposing electrical requirements in this Supplemental NPR, and instead expects staff to continue working with applicable ASTM subcommittees to develop electrical requirements for all applicable durable infant or toddler products with electrical components. 
C. Structural Integrity and Other 
Product Related Issues 
Structural integrity and other product 
related issues identified in this Supplemental NPR are similar to issues previously found in bassinet/cradle incidents. Accordingly, performance 
and testing requirements in the bassinet/cradle standard will likely address these incidents for infant sleep products. 
D. Infant Placement Issues 
Infants placed prone on soft bedding 
in inclined sleep products are at great 
risk for suffocation because of the incline and the soft bedding. Although requiring infant sleep products to comply with the bassinet/cradle standard will reduce the incline angle, and will provide warnings about not using soft bedding, parents may still place infants prone in the product. Staff will continue to work with ASTM and other organizations with information and education campaigns to prevent infants’ deaths due to unsafe sleep practices. 
VIII. Proposed Standard for Infant 
Sleep Products 
This Supplemental NPR proposes to 
establish a children’s product safety standard for infant sleep products as a type of durable infant or toddler product under section 104 of the CPSIA. The Mannen Study findings and incident reports indicate that neither ASTM F3118–17, nor ASTM F3118–17a, are adequate to address the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products, because these voluntary standards allow for infant inclined sleep products with a seat back angle greater than 10 degrees. More stringent requirements are necessary in the mandatory standard to further reduce the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products. Accordingly, the Supplemental NPR proposes to incorporate by reference ASTM F3118– 17a as the mandatory standard for infant sleep products, with the following 
modifications: 
a. Modify the introduction and scope 
of the standard to state the purpose of the standard is to address all infant sleep products not already covered by traditional sleep product standards. 
b. Modify the definitions of accessory, 
compact, infant inclined sleep products, and newborn inclined sleep products to remove the term ‘‘inclined.’’ 
c. Modify seat back angle so the 
maximum allowable seat back angle must be equal to or less than 10° in all 
positions recommended for sleep. 
d. Add new requirement—infant sleep 
products must meet 16 CFR 1218 Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles. 
e. Remove all the performance 
requirements except for the above new or modified requirements. 
f. Remove all test methods except for 
maximum seat back angle. 
The Supplemental NPR proposes that 
infant sleep products meet 16 CFR 1218 
Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles because this standard is an established standard for products that provide sleep accommodations for infants, and the standard addresses the hazard associated with inclined sleep by limiting the seat back angle to 10 degrees or less. Additionally, the name of CPSC’s standard would not include the term ‘‘inclined,’’ and would be codified as 16 CFR part 1236, Safety Standard for Infant Sleep Products. A redline of these proposed changes is included at Tab C of the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package. 
The Supplemental NPR proposes that 
infant sleep products meet the warning requirements in the bassinet and cradle standard, instead of those stated in ASTM F3118–17a. For this proposed modification, the Supplemental NPR relies on focus groups with parents and grandparents of infants less than 1 year of age. Participants provided information on caregivers’ perceptions and reactions to safety messaging, indicating that participants were aware of warning labels on infant sleep products. Additionally, participants reported that the label shown during the focus group looked similar and contained comparable information to labels that they find on products they own. Some participants reported that they tend to gloss over warning labels, as they believe the language to be the same on every label. Some participants reported that they thought the main message on a warning label was to be careful and keep an eye on their infant. In contrast, a few participants believed that manufacturers use warning labels to protect themselves from liability or litigation. Participants’ 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160957 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
recommendations to improve warning 
labels included making the labels more concise and making the labels ‘‘stand out.’’ CPSC staff is working with a contractor to develop new safe sleep warnings and messaging, potentially across all sleep products. In the future, staff could recommend changes in warnings based on this work. 
IX. Proposed Amendment to 16 CFR 
Part 1112 To Include NOR for Infant Sleep Products 
The CPSA establishes certain 
requirements for product certification and testing. Products subject to a consumer product safety rule under the CPSA, or to a similar rule, ban, standard or regulation under any other act enforced by the Commission, must be certified as complying with all applicable CPSC-enforced requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Certification of children’s products subject to a children’s product safety rule must be based on testing conducted by a CPSC- accepted third party conformity assessment body. Id. 2063(a)(2). The 
Commission must publish an NOR for the accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess conformity with a children’s product safety rule to which a children’s product is subject. Id. 2063(a)(3). Thus, the 
proposed rule for 16 CFR part 1236, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Sleep Products, if issued as a final rule, would be a children’s product safety rule that requires the issuance of an NOR. 
The Commission published a final 
rule, Requirements Pertaining to Third 
Party Conformity Assessment Bodies, 78 FR 15836 (March 12, 2013), codified at 16 CFR part 1112 (‘‘part 1112’’) and effective on June 10, 2013, which establishes requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to test for conformity with a children’s product safety rule in accordance with section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA. Part 1112 also codifies all of the NORs issued previously by the Commission. 
All new NORs for new children’s 
product safety rules, such as the inclined sleep products standard, require an amendment to part 1112. To meet the requirement that the Commission issue an NOR for the inclined sleep products standard, as part of this NPR, the Commission proposes to amend the existing rule that codifies the list of all NORs issued by the Commission to add inclined sleep products to the list of children’s product safety rules for which the CPSC has issued an NOR. Test laboratories applying for 
acceptance as a CPSC-accepted third 
party conformity assessment body to test to the new standard for inclined sleep products would be required to meet the third party conformity assessment body accreditation requirements in part 1112. When a laboratory meets the requirements as a CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body, the laboratory can apply to the CPSC to have 16 CFR part 1236, Standard Consumer Safety 
Specification for Infant Sleep Products, included in the laboratory’s scope of accreditation of CPSC safety rules listed for the laboratory on the CPSC website at: www.cpsc.gov/labsearch. 
X. Proposed Amendment to Definitions in Consumer Registration Rule 
The statutory definition of ‘‘durable 
infant or toddler product’’ in section 104(f) applies to all of section 104 of the CPSIA. In addition to requiring the Commission to issue safety standards for durable infant or toddler products, section 104 of the CPSIA also directed the Commission to issue a rule requiring that manufacturers of durable infant or toddler products establish a program for consumer registration of those products. Public Law 110–314, section 104(d). 
Section 104(f) of the CPSIA defines 
the term ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ and lists examples of such products, including several types of infant sleep products, such as cribs and bassinets and cradles. Section 104(f)(2)(A) & (L). As discussed previously, the infant sleep products 
safety standard is an outgrowth of the bassinet safety standard. The Supplemental NPR proposes that any infant sleep product that is not already subject to a mandatory consumer product safety rule for infant sleep, be subject to proposed part 1236, which would limit the seat back incline angle to 10 degrees or less. Like bassinets, such sleep products are durable products within the meaning of section 104 of the CPSIA. 
Because this infant sleep product 
standard is an outgrowth of the bassinet standard, infant sleep products may be considered a sub-category of bassinets. To provide greater clarity that inclined sleep products are durable infant or toddler products, the Commission proposes to amend the Commission’s consumer registration rule to explicitly include infant sleep products. 
In 2009, the Commission issued a rule 
implementing the consumer registration requirement. 16 CFR part 1130. As the CPSIA directs, the consumer registration rule requires each manufacturer of a durable infant or toddler product to: provide a postage-paid consumer registration form with each product; keep records of consumers who register their products with the manufacturer; and permanently place the manufacturer’s name and certain other identifying information on the product. When the Commission issued the consumer registration rule, the Commission identified six additional products as ‘‘durable infant or toddler products’’: 
D Children’s folding chairs 
D changing tables; 
D infant bouncers; 
D infant bathtubs; 
D bed rails; and 
D infant slings. 
16 CFR 1130.2. The Commission 
stated that the specified statutory categories were not exclusive, but that the Commission should explicitly identify the product categories that are covered. The preamble to the 2009 final consumer registration rule states: ‘‘Because the statute has a broad definition of a durable infant or toddler product but also includes 12 specific product categories, additional items can and should be included in the definition, but should also be specifically listed in the rule.’’ 74 FR 68668, 68669 (Dec. 29, 2009). 
In this Supplemental NPR, the 
Commission proposes to amend the definition of ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ in the consumer registration rule to clarify that infant sleep products fall within the term ‘‘durable infant or toddler product’’ as a subset of bassinets and cradles, and must comply with the product registration card rule and section 104 of the CPSIA. 
XI. Incorporation by Reference 
The Commission proposes to 
incorporate by reference ASTM F3118– 
17a, with substantial modifications to further reduce the risk of injury. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) has regulations concerning incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part 51. For a proposed rule, agencies must discuss in the preamble of the NPR ways that the materials the agency proposes to incorporate by reference are reasonably available to interested persons or how the agency worked to make the materials reasonably available. In addition, the preamble of the proposed rule must summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(a). 
In accordance with the OFR’s 
requirements, section VIII of this preamble summarizes the provisions of ASTM F3118–17a that the Commission proposes to incorporate by reference. ASTM F3118–17a is copyrighted. By permission of ASTM, the standard can 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160958 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
9Some units may still be available for sale even 
for products that are no longer being produced (this 
does not include recalled models). 
10These suppliers were identified online, and 
staff believes that there may be additional home- based manufacturers supplying infant hammocks on a very small scale (possibly including some without an on-line presence). be viewed as a read-only document 
during the comment period on this NPR, at: http://www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. 
Interested persons may also purchase a copy of ASTM F3118–17 from ASTM International, 100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; http://www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. 
One may also inspect a copy at CPSC’s Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301–504–7923. 
XII. Effective Date 
The Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA) generally requires that the 
effective date of a rule be at least 30 days after publication of the final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). ASTM F3118–17a is a relatively new voluntary standard that covers a variety of products whose manufacturers may not be aware that their product must comply. The Commission is proposing to incorporate by reference ASTM F3118–17a, with substantial modifications to further reduce the risk of injury associated with infant inclined sleep products. To allow time for infant sleep product manufacturers to bring their products into compliance after a final rule is issued, the Commission proposes a 12- month effective date after publication of a final rule, for products manufactured or imported on or after that date. Because of the number of proposed modifications to ASTM F3118–17a, compliance with the mandatory standard may require time beyond the typical 6-month effective date for a section 104 rule. The Commission expects that most firms should be able to comply within the 12-month timeframe. Alternatively, given the hazards involved with infant inclined sleep products, the Commission could issue a final rule with a shorter effective date so that safer products would be available sooner. The Commission requests comments on whether either a longer or shorter effective date would be appropriate. 
XIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act A. Introduction 
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 
requires that agencies review a proposed 
rule for the rule’s potential economic impact on small entities, including small businesses. Section 603 of the RFA generally requires that agencies prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and make the analysis available to the public for comment when the agency publishes an NPR. 5 U.S.C. 603. Section 605 of the RFA provides that an IRFA is not required if the agency certifies that the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The IRFA must describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities and identify significant alternatives that accomplish the statutory objectives and minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. Specifically, the IRFA must contain: 
DA description of the reasons why 
action by the agency is being considered; 
Da succinct statement of the 
objectives of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule; 
Da description of, and where feasible, 
an estimate of the number of small entities to which the proposed rule will apply; 
Da description of the projected 
reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities subject to the requirements and the type of professional skills necessary for the preparation of reports or records; and 
Didentification, to the extent 
possible, of all relevant federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule; and 
Additionally, the IRFA must describe 
any significant alternatives to the proposed rule that accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. 
CPSC staff prepared an IRFA for this 
rulemaking which appears at Tab F of the Staff Supplemental Briefing Package. We provide a summary of the IRFA below. 
B. Reasons for Agency Action and Legal 
Basis for Supplemental NPR 
As explained elsewhere in this 
preamble, section 104 of the CPSIA authorizes the Commission to issue standards for durable infant or toddler products and requires that such products comply with product registration requirements. The Commission is issuing this Supplemental NPR in response to reports of deaths involving inclined sleep products. 
C. Supplemental NPR Requirements 
The Supplemental NPR would 
incorporate by reference the voluntary 
standard for inclined sleep products (ASTM F3118–17a) with substantial modifications described in section VIII of this preamble. Products subject to the proposed standard would need to have a sleep surface angle no greater than 10° 
and would need to meet the requirements of the CPSC standard for bassinets and cradles. If the Commission issues a final rule, the proposed rule would become a mandatory standard, and firms with a sleep product that is subject to the rule would need to evaluate their product, determine what changes would be required to meet the standard, and modify the product so that it complies with the standard or cease supplying the product to the U.S. market. The manufacture or importation of noncompliant products would be prohibited after the effective date of the standard. Additionally, manufacturers and importers must certify that their 
products comply with applicable children’s products safety standards, and this certification must be based on testing by a third party. 16 CFR part 1107. 
D. Small Entities Supplying Infant Sleep 
Products and the Supplemental NPR’s Impact on Small Businesses 
Since the Commission issued the 
2017 NPR, the U.S. inclined sleep product market has changed substantially. Manufacturers and importers have largely stopped producing for sale most frame-style inclined sleep products from the market, including some that were not subject to recalls, although one or two types of products remain.
9Additionally, 
a significant decline in the infant hammock market has occurred, both among larger-scale suppliers and home- based manufacturers. 
As part of the current market 
evaluation, staff identified 18 firms still supplying sleep products to the U.S. market with sleep surface angles greater than 10 degrees, but less than or equal to 30 degrees. Staff identified an additional firm supplying a sleep product with an incline of 10 degrees or less that is not being tested for compliance with either the bassinet standard or another sleep product standard (and thus, likely would be subject to the Supplemental NPR). Of these 19 total firms, six appear to be very small, home-based manufacturers of infant hammocks (two operating domestically and four overseas).
10The 
RFA covers only domestic suppliers. Seven of the 19 firms are not as small as the home-based infant hammock 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160959 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
11Staff considered whether adopting the 
voluntary inclined sleeper standard with no 
modifications might also be an alternative, but ruled it out because it would not address the injuries and deaths that led to the recent inclined sleeper recalls. manufacturers, but would meet the 
definition of ‘‘small’’ domestic entities based on U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) guidelines for their North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. These seven firms typically have only one inclined sleep model in their product lines. 
In summary, CPSC staff is aware of 
nine small domestic firms currently marketing products that would be impacted by the Supplemental NPR in the United States (two home-based domestic hammock manufacturers, four small domestic manufacturers of inclined sleep products, and three small 
importers of inclined sleep products). Staff cannot definitively determine the impact of the Supplemental NPR because the impact would depend on several unknown factors including: 
•How firms respond to the rule (e.g., 
they would redesign, remarket, or drop products subject to the Supplemental NPR); 
•The costs associated with 
redesigning, remarketing, or replacing an inclined sleep product; 
•The change, if any, on demand for 
that product. 
Staff estimates that third party testing 
costs could be $30 to $100 per sample for the maximum incline test alone, and testing to the bassinet standard could add costs up to another $1,000. Reliance on third party tests obtained by suppliers as allowed by the component part testing rule (16 CFR part 1109) could reduce testing costs to some extent. Staff found that third party costs are likely to be significant for the two very small home-based manufacturers of infant hammocks if they choose to redesign; and costs could be significant 
for an additional two small manufacturers, if they chose to redesign their products and testing as few as four units per model were required to provide a ‘‘high degree of assurance.’’ 
E. Alternatives 
At least two alternatives are available 
that could minimize the economic 
impact on small entities while also meeting the statutory objectives:
11(1) 
Eliminate the requirement that products must meet the bassinet standard if they do not already fall into another sleep product standard; or (2) allow a later effective date. However, under the first alternative, the cost of redesign would still likely be significant. Moreover, the Supplemental NPR is intended to 
ensure that all products providing sleep accommodations for infants meet a base set of safety requirements. This alternative would not accomplish this goal. 
Second, the Commission could also 
reduce the Supplemental NPR’s impact on small businesses by setting a later effective date than the proposed 12 months. A later effective date would reduce the economic impact on firms redesigning their existing products in two ways. Firms would be less likely to experience a lapse in production/ importation, which could result if they are unable to bring their products into compliance and certify compliance based on third party tests within the required timeframe. Also, firms could spread the costs of developing compliant products over a longer time period, thereby reducing their annual costs, as well as the present value of their total costs (i.e., they could time 
their spending to better accommodate their individual circumstances). The Commission requests comments on the 12-months effective date, which was set to help reduce the impact on affected firms, as well as feedback on how firms would likely respond to the Supplemental NPR. 
F. Small Business Impacts of the 
Accreditation Requirements for Testing Laboratories 
In accordance with section 14 of the 
CPSA, all children’s products that are subject to a children’s product safety rule must be tested by a CPSC-accepted third party conformity assessment body (i.e., testing laboratory) for compliance 
with applicable children’s product safety rules. Testing laboratories that want to conduct this testing must meet the NOR pertaining to third party conformity testing. NORs have been codified for existing rules at 16 CFR part 
1112. Consequently, the Commission proposes to amend 16 CFR part 1112 to establish the NOR for those testing laboratories that want to test for compliance with the infant sleep products final rule (in essence, test for maximum seat back angle). This section assesses the impact of the amendment on small laboratories. 
A final regulatory flexibility analysis 
(FRFA) was conducted as part of the promulgation of the original 1112 rule (78 FR 15836, 15855–58), as required by the RFA. Briefly, the FRFA concluded that the accreditation requirements would not have a significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small laboratories because no requirements were imposed on laboratories that did not intend to provide third party testing services. The only laboratories that were expected to provide such services were those that anticipated receiving sufficient revenue from the mandated testing to justify accepting the requirements as a business decision. 
Based on similar reasoning, amending 
the rule to include the NOR for the infant sleep product standard will not have a significant adverse impact on small laboratories. Moreover, based upon the number of laboratories in the United States that have applied for CPSC acceptance of the accreditation to test for conformance to other juvenile product standards, we expect that only a few laboratories will seek CPSC acceptance of their accreditation to test for conformance with the infant sleep product standard. Most of these laboratories will have already been accredited to test for conformance to other juvenile product standards, and the only costs to them would be the cost of adding the infant sleep product standard to their scope of accreditation, a cost that test laboratories have indicated is extremely low when they are already accredited for other section 104 rules. Consequently, the Commission certifies that the NOR for the infant sleep product standard will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
XIV. Environmental Considerations 
The Commission’s regulations address 
whether the agency is required to 
prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement. Under these regulations, certain categories of CPSC actions normally have ‘‘little or no potential for affecting the human environment,’’ and therefore do not require an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement. Safety standards providing requirements for products come under this categorical exclusion. 16 CFR 1021.5(c)(1). The Supplemental NPR falls within the categorical exclusion. 
XV. Paperwork Reduction Act 
This proposed rule contains 
information collection requirements that 
are subject to public comment and review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3521). In this document, pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D), we set forth: 
DA title for the collection of 
information; 
Da summary of the collection of 
information; 
Da brief description of the need for 
the information and the proposed use of the information; 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160960 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
Da description of the likely 
respondents and proposed frequency of 
response to the collection of information; 
Dan estimate of the burden that shall 
result from the collection of information; and 
Dnotice that comments may be 
submitted to the OMB. 
Title: Safety Standard for Infant Sleep 
Products. 
Description: The Supplemental NPR 
would incorporate by reference ASTM F3118–17a, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Inclined Sleep Products, but with modifications, 
including to sections 8 and 9 which contain requirements for marking, labeling, and instructional literature. The Supplemental NPR would exclude from the rule infant sleep products covered by another mandatory standard for sleep products (Section 1.3). However, the Supplemental NPR would modify section 5.2 of ASTM F3118–17a to require that accessory, compact, infant sleep products, and newborn sleep products meet the requirements of the Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles (16 CFR 1218), including the marking, labeling, and instructional requirements. These marking, labeling, and instructional requirements fall within the definition of ‘‘collection of information,’’ as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3). 
Description of Respondents: Persons 
who manufacture or import infant sleep products. 
Estimated Burden: We estimate the 
burden of this collection of information as follows: 
TABLE 1—E STIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN  
Burden type Type of supplier Number of 
respondents Frequency of 
responses Total annual 
responses Hours per 
response Total burden 
hours 
Labeling .............................. Home-based manufacturers 6 1 6 7 42 
Other Suppliers ................... 13 1 13 1 13 
Labeling Total .............. ............................................. ........................ ........................ ...... .................. ........................ 55 
Instructional literature ......... Home-based manufacturers 6 1 50 300 300 
Total Burden ................ ............................................. ........................ ........................ ...... .................. ........................ 355 
Our estimate is based on the 
following: 
Two groups of quantifiable entities 
supply infant sleep products to the U.S. market that will likely need to make some modifications to their existing warning labels to meet the requirements for bassinet and cradle warnings. The first group consists of very small home- based manufacturers, which may not currently have warning labels on their infant sleep products. Similar rulemakings (such as that for sling carriers) assumed that it would take home-based manufacturers approximately 15 hours to develop a new label. Given that some home-based manufacturers supply infant sleep products with warning labels already, we have estimated approximately 7 hours per response for this group of suppliers. Therefore, the total burden hours for very small home-based manufacturers is 7 hours per model × 6 
entities × 1 models per entity = 42 
hours. 
The second group of quantifiable 
entities supplying infant sleep products to the U.S. market that will need to make some modifications to their existing warning labels are non-home- based manufacturers and importers. These firms do not operate at the low production volume of the home-based firms. All of the firms in this second group have existing warning labels on their products, but not for bassinets and cradles and would therefore, have to make label modifications. Given that these firms are used to working with warning labels, we estimate that the time required to make any modifications now or in the future would be about 1 hour per model. Based on an evaluation of supplier product lines, each entity supplies an average of 1 model of infant sleeper; therefore, the estimated burden associated with labels for this second group is 1 hours per model × 13 entities 
× 1 models per entity = 13 hours. 
The total burden hours attributable to 
warning labels is the sum of the burden hours for both entity groups: Very small home-based manufacturers (42 burden hours) + non-home-based manufacturers and importers (13 burden hours) = 55 burden hours. We estimate the hourly compensation for the time required to create and update labels is $34.61 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘‘Employer Costs for Employee Compensation,’’ March 2019, total compensation for all sales and office workers in goods- producing private industries, series id CMU201G000200000D: http://
www.bls.gov/ncs/). Therefore, the estimated annual cost to industry associated with the labeling requirements is $1,904 ($34.61 per hour × 55 hours = $1,904). No operating, 
maintenance, or capital costs are associated with the collection. 
The Standard for Bassinets and 
Cradles (section 9) requires instructions to be supplied with the product. As already noted, the proposed Safety Standard for Infant Sleep Products requires accessory, compact, infant sleep products, and newborn sleep products to meet these requirements. Under the OMB’s regulations (5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2)), the time, effort, and financial resources necessary to comply 
with a collection of information that would be incurred by persons in the ‘‘normal course of their activities’’ are excluded from a burden estimate, where an agency demonstrates that the disclosure activities required to comply are ‘‘usual and customary.’’ 
We are unaware of infant sleep 
products that generally require use instructions but lack such instructions. However, it is possible that the six home-based manufacturers of infant hammocks may not supply instruction manuals as part of their ‘‘normal course of activities.’’ Based on information collected for the infant slings rulemaking, staff tentatively estimates 
that each small entity supplying homemade infant hammocks might require 50 hours to develop an instruction manual to accompany their products. These firms typically supply only one infant hammock model. Therefore, the costs of designing an instruction manual for these firms could be as high as $10,383 (50 hours per model × 6 entities × 1 models per entity 
= 300 hours × $34.61 per hour = 
$10,383). Not all firms would incur these costs every year, but new firms that enter the market would incur these costs, and this is a highly fluctuating market. Other firms are estimated to have no burden hours associated with section 9 of the Standard for Bassinets and Cradles because any burden associated with supplying instructions with infant sleep products would be ‘‘usual and customary’’ and not within 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160961 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
the definition of ‘‘burden’’ under the 
OMB’s regulations. 
Based on this analysis, CPSC staff 
estimates that the Supplemental NPR for infant sleep products would impose a burden to industry of 355 hours at a cost of $12,287 annually. 
In compliance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), we have submitted the information collection requirements of this rule to the OMB for review. Interested persons are requested to submit comments regarding information collection by December 12, 2019, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB (see the 
ADDRESSES section 
at the beginning of this notice). 
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), 
we invite comments on: 
DWhether the collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the CPSC’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; 
Dthe accuracy of the CPSC’s estimate 
of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 
Dways to enhance the quality, utility, 
and clarity of the information to be collected; 
Dways to reduce the burden of the 
collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology; 
Dthe estimated burden hours 
required for home-based manufacturers to modify warning labels; 
Dthe estimated burden hours 
associated with label modification for non-home-based suppliers, including any alternative estimates; 
Dthe estimated burden hours 
required for home-based manufacturers to modify (or, in some cases, create) instruction manuals. 
XVI. Preemption 
Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 
2075(a), provides that when a consumer 
product safety standard is in effect and applies to a product, no state or political subdivision of a state may either establish or continue in effect a standard or regulation that prescribes requirements for the performance, composition, contents, design, finish, construction, packaging, or labeling of such product dealing with the same risk of injury unless the state requirement is identical to the federal standard. Section 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that states or political subdivisions of states may apply to the Commission for an exemption from this preemption under certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of the CPSIA refers to the rules to be 
issued under that section as ‘‘consumer product safety rules.’’ Therefore, the preemption provision of section 26(a) of the CPSA would apply to a rule issued under section 104. 
XVII. Request for Comments 
This Supplemental NPR proposes a 
rule under section 104(b) of the CPSIA 
to issue a consumer product safety standard for infant sleep products, to amend part 1112 to add infant sleep products to the list of children’s product safety rules for which the CPSC has issued an NOR, and to amend part 1130 to identify infant sleep products as a durable infant or toddler product subject to CPSC consumer registration requirements. The Commission requests comments on the standard’s scope language; the proposed effective date; the costs of compliance with, and testing to, the proposed Safety Standard 
for Infant Sleep Products; and any aspect of this proposal. During the comment period, the ASTM F3118–17a Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Inclined Sleep Products, is available as a read-only document at: http://www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. 
The Commission requests comments 
on the following specific issues: 
•Products likely to be impacted by 
the Supplemental NPR, including the product categories discussed in the preamble and any additional types of products that commenters believe may be impacted by the Supplemental NPR. 
•How firms with inclined sleep 
surfaces will likely respond to the Supplemental NPR, including suppliers of products with inclines above 10 degrees and products with inclines less than or equal to 10 degrees that do not already comply with the bassinet standard. We would also appreciate any information on the possible responses of consumers to changes in marketing. Additionally, any information on the approximate percentage of revenue attributable to these types of products would be valuable. The Commission also requests any information regarding the safety of sleep angles in excess of 10 degrees but less than 20 degrees. 
•The impact that promulgating the 
Supplemental NPR would have on the cost of testing and certifying products, particularly on small manufacturers and importers. Any information on the number of samples that must be tested would be especially helpful. The Commission also requests comments on the third party testing costs of the maximum incline test in the Supplemental NPR. 
•The cost of redesign, the time 
required for redesign, the likely response of manufacturers to the 
Supplemental NPR’s requirements (i.e., redesign, remarket, or drop), the possible change in demand due to remarketing or changing the sleep surface’s degree of incline, the cost of (and time required for) remarketing, and (for firms supplying comments) the relative significance of inclined sleepers to their total revenue. The Commission also requests comments on testing costs, including the number of inclined sleeper units that typically need to be tested to provide a ‘‘high degree of assurance’’ of compliance. 
•The age and developmental 
milestones referenced in the scope and definitions of the various infant inclined sleep products covered by ASTM F3118–17a. Because this Supplemental NPR proposes to address ‘‘infant sleep products’’ not already covered by traditional sleep products, the Commission is considering removing 
the upper age limit from the scope of the mandatory standard, to accommodate a broad scope of infant sleep products within the standard. The Commission’s consideration is based on the fact that when staff knew the age of an infant, twenty percent of the fatalities and injuries involved infants 6 months and older. 
•The APA generally requires that the 
effective date of a rule be at least 30 days after publication of the final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Section XII of this preamble proposes a 12-month effective date after publication of a final rule, for products manufactured or imported on or after that date, stating that a longer effective date than the typical 6 months for a section 104 rule may be necessary because of the number of proposed modifications to ASTM F3118–17a. Given the hazards involved with infant inclined sleep products, the Commission could issue a final rule with a shorter effective date so that safer products would be available sooner. The Commission requests comments on whether either a longer or shorter effective date would be appropriate. 
Comments should be submitted in 
accordance with the instructions in the 
ADDRESSES section at the beginning of 
this notice. 
List of Subjects 16 CFR Part 1112 
Administrative practice and 
procedure, Audit, Consumer protection, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Third party conformity assessment body. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160962 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
16 CFR Part 1130 
Administrative practice and 
procedure, Business and industry, 
Consumer protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 
16 CFR Part 1236 
Consumer protection, Imports, 
Incorporation by reference, Infants and 
children, Labeling, Law enforcement, and Toys. 
For the reasons discussed in the 
preamble, the Commission proposes to amend Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: 
PART 1112—REQUIREMENTS 
PERTAINING TO THIRD PARTY CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES 
■1. The authority citation for part 1112 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: Pub. L. 110–314, section 3, 122 
Stat. 3016, 3017 (2008); 15 U.S.C. 2063. 
■2. Amend § 1112.15 by adding 
paragraph (b)(46) to read as follows: 
§ 1112.15 When can a third party 
conformity assessment body apply for CPSC acceptance for a particular CPSC rule or test method? 
* * * * * 
(b) * * * 
(46) 16 CFR part 1236, Safety 
Standard for Infant Sleep Products. 
* * * * * 
PART 1130—REQUIREMENTS FOR 
CONSUMER REGISTRATION OF DURABLE INFANT OR TODDLER PRODUCTS 
■3. The authority citation for part 1130 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2056a, 2065(b). 
■4. Amend § 1130.2 by revising 
paragraph (a)(12) to read as follows: 
§ 1130.2 Definitions. 
* * * * * 
(a) * * * 
(12) Bassinets and cradles, including 
bedside sleepers and infant sleep 
products; 
* * * * * 
■5. Add part 1236 to read as follows: 
PART 1236—SAFETY STANDARD FOR 
INFANT SLEEP PRODUCTS 
Sec. 
1236.1 Scope. 1236.2 Requirements for infant sleep 
products. 
Authority: Sec. 104, Pub. L. 110–314, 122 
Stat. 3016 (15 U.S.C. 2056a); Sec. 3, Pub. L. 112–28, 125 Stat. 273. § 1236.1 Scope. 
This part establishes a consumer 
product safety standard for infant sleep 
products, including: Frame-type, hammock, compact, and accessory. This consumer product safety standard covers all infant sleep products that are not covered by another consumer product safety standard, including: 
(a) 16 CFR part 1218 Safety Standard 
for Bassinets and Cradles; 
(b) 16 CFR part 1219 Safety Standard 
for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(c) 16 CFR part 1220 Safety Standard 
for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(d) 16 CFR part 1221 Safety Standard 
for Play Yards; and 
(e) 16 CFR part 1222 Safety Standard 
for Bedside Sleepers. 
§ 1236.2 Requirements for infant sleep 
products. 
(a) Except as provided in paragraph 
(b) of this section, each infant sleep 
product must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM F3118– 17a, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Inclined Sleep Products (approved on September 1, 2017). The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; http:// 
www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. You may 
inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301–504–7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: www.archives.gov/ 
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations. 
(b) Comply with ASTM F3118–17a 
with the following additions or exclusions: 
(1) Instead of complying with 
Introduction of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
(i) Introduction. (A) This consumer 
safety specification addresses incidents associated with infant inclined sleep products identified by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). 
(B) In response to incident data 
compiled by the CPSC, this consumer safety specification attempts to minimize the following: Fall hazards, positional asphyxiation, and obstruction of nose and mouth by bedding. The purpose of the standard is to address infant sleep products not already covered by traditional sleep product standards and to prevent deaths due to the use of Infant Sleep Products with a seat back angle greater than 10° from the 
horizontal. 
(C) This consumer safety specification 
is written within the current state-of- the-art of infant sleep product technology and will be updated whenever substantive information becomes available that necessitates additional requirements or justifies the revision of existing requirements. 
(ii) [Reserved]. 
(2) In section 1.1 of ASTM F3118–17a, 
replace the term ‘‘infant inclined sleep 
products’’ with ‘‘infant sleep products.’’ 
(3) In section 1.2 of ASTM F3118–17a, 
replace the term ‘‘infant inclined sleep products’’ with ‘‘infant sleep products.’’ 
(4) Instead of complying with section 
1.3 of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
(i) 1.3 This consumer safety 
performance specification covers products that are not covered by other ASTM standards such as: 
(A) ASTM F1169 Standard Consumer 
Safety Specification for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(B) ASTM F406 Standard Consumer 
Safety Specification for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs/Play Yards; 
(C) ASTM F2194 Standard Consumer 
Safety Specification for Bassinets and Cradles; and 
(D) ASTM F2906 Standard Consumer 
Safety Specification for Bedside Sleepers. This consumer safety performance specification covers free standing products with an infant sleep surface primarily intended and marketed to provide sleeping accommodations for an infant up to 5 months old or when the infant begins to roll over or pull up on sides, whichever comes first. It also covers smaller products intended for newborns up to 3 months old or when a newborn begins to wiggle out of position or turn over in the product or weighs more than 15 lb (6.8 kg), whichever comes first. It also covers infant and newborn sleep product accessories, which are attached to or supported by, another product with the same age or abilities, or both, as the free standing products. If the infant sleep product can be converted into a product for which another ASTM standard consumer safety specification exists, the product shall meet the applicable requirements of that standard. 
(ii) [Reserved]. 
(5) In section 1.4 of ASTM F3118–17a, 
replace the term ‘‘infant inclined sleep 
product’’ with ‘‘infant sleep product.’’ 
(6) Instead of complying with section 
2 of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP160963 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 12, 2019 / Proposed Rules 
12For referenced ASTM standard, visit the ASTM 
website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer 
Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of 
ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the 
standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website. 
13Available from U.S. Government Printing 
Office Superintendent of Documents, 732 N. Capitol St. NW, Mail Stop: SDE, Washington, DC 20401, http://www.access.gpo.gov. (i) 2. Referenced Documents. 
(ii) 2.1 ASTM Standards.12(A) F406 
Standard Consumer Safety Specification 
for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs/Play Yards; 
(B) F1169 Standard Consumer Safety 
Specification for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(C) F2194 Consumer Safety 
Specification for Bassinets and Cradles; 
(D) F2906 Standard Consumer Safety 
Specification for Bedside Sleepers. 
(iii) 2.2 Federal Standards.
13 
(A) 16 CFR part 1218—Safety 
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles; 
(B) 16 CFR part 1219—Safety 
Standard for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(C) 16 CFR part 1220—Safety 
Standard for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(D) 16 CFR part 1221—Safety 
Standard for Play Yards; and 
(E) 16 CFR part 1222—Safety 
Standard for Bedside Sleepers. 
(7) Do not comply with sections 2.3 
and 2.4 of ASTM F3118–17a, including Figures 1 and 2. 
(8) In section 3.1.1 of ASTM F3118– 
17a, replace the following terms: 
(i) Replace the term ‘‘accessory 
inclined sleep product’’ with ‘‘accessory infant sleep product.’’ 
(ii) Replace the term ‘‘inclined sleep 
product’’ with ‘‘infant sleep product.’’ 
(9) In section 3.1.2 of ASTM F3118– 
17a, replace the following terms: 
(i) Replace the term ‘‘compact 
inclined sleep product’’ with ‘‘compact infant sleep product.’’ 
(ii) Replace the term ‘‘newborn 
inclined sleep product’’ with ‘‘newborn infant sleep product.’’ 
(10) Do not comply with sections 
3.1.3 through 3.1.6 of ASTM F3118–17a. 
(11) Instead of complying with section 
3.1.7 of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
(i) 3.1.7 infant sleep product, n—a 
freestanding product, intended to provide a sleeping accommodation for an infant up to approximately 5 months of age, that is generally supported by a stationary or rocker base and that is not subject to any of the following standards: 
(A) 16 CFR part 1218—Safety 
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles; 
(B) 16 CFR part 1219—Safety 
Standard for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(C) 16 CFR parts 1220 and 1221— 
Safety Standard for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs and Play Yards; and (D) 16 CFR part 1222—Safety 
Standard for Bedside Sleepers. 
(ii) [Reserved]. 
(12) Do not comply with sections 
3.1.7.1 through 3.1.9 of ASTM F3118– 
17a. 
(13) Instead of complying with section 
3.1.10 of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
(i) 3.1.10 newborn sleep product, n— 
a free standing product, intended to provide sleeping accommodations for a newborn up to approximately 3 months of age, that is supported by a stationary or rocker base and whose seat back length, measured from the bight, is not greater than 17 in. (432 mm) and that is not subject to any of the following standards: 
(A) 16 CFR part 1218—Safety 
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles; 
(B) 16 CFR part 1219—Safety 
Standard for Full-Size Baby Cribs; 
(C) 16 CFR parts 1220 and 1221— 
Safety Standard for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs and Play Yards; and 
(D) 16 CFR part 1222—Safety 
Standard for Bedside Sleepers. 
(ii) [Reserved]. 
(14) Do not comply with sections 
3.1.11 through 3.1.13 of ASTM F3118– 
17a. 
(15) Do not comply with section 5 of 
ASTM F3118–17a. 
(16) Do not comply with sections 6.1 
through 6.8 of ASTM F3118–17a. 
(17) Instead of complying with section 
6.9 of ASTM F3118–17a, comply with the following: 
(i) 6.9 Maximum Seat Back Angle. 
(ii) 6.9.1 Accessory, Compact, and 
Infant Sleep Product—The angle of the seat back surface intended for sleep along the occupant’s head to toe axis relative to the horizontal shall not exceed 10° when tested in accordance 
with 7.11.2. 
(iii) 6.9.2 Accessory, Compact, and 
Newborn Sleep Product—The angle of the seat back surface intended for sleep along the occupant’s head to toe axis relative to the horizontal shall not exceed 10° when tested in accordance 
with 7.11.3. 
(iv) 6.9.3 Accessory, Compact, Infant 
Sleep Products, and Newborn Sleep Products—shall meet requirements of 16 CFR part 1218 Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles. 
(18) Do not comply with sections 6.10 
through 7.10 of ASTM F3118–17a. 
(19) In section 7.11.2.1 of ASTM 
F3118–17a, replace ‘‘Infant Inclined Sleep Product and Infant Inclined Sleep Product Accessory’’ with ‘‘Accessory, Compact, Infant Sleep Products, and Newborn Sleep Products.’’ 
(20) In section 7.11.2.1 of ASTM 
F3118–17a, replace ‘‘If applicable, place the product in the manufacturer’s recommended highest incline angle position.’’ with ‘‘If applicable, place the product in the manufacturer’s recommended highest seat back angle position intended for sleep.’’ 
(21) In section 7.11.3 of ASTM 
F3118–17a, replace ‘‘Newborn Inclined Sleep Product and Newborn Inclined Sleep Product Accessory’’ with ‘‘Accessory, Compact, Infant Sleep Products, and Newborn Sleep Products.’’ 
(22) Do not comply with sections 7.12 
through 9, or the Appendix, of ASTM F3118–17a. 
Alberta E. Mills, 
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
[FR Doc. 2019–23724 Filed 11–8–19; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 
COMMISSION 
17 CFR Part 160 
RIN 3038–AE91 
Privacy of Consumer Financial 
Information 
AGENCY : Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission. 
ACTION : Proposed rule. 
SUMMARY : The Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) is proposing to make a correction to one of the Commission’s regulations to restore text that was inadvertently deleted in a 2011 amendment to that regulation. 
DATES : Comments must be received on 
or before December 12, 2019. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments, 
identified by RIN 3038–AE91, by any of the following methods: 
•CFTC Comments Portal: https://
comments.cftc.gov. Select the ‘‘Submit 
Comments’’ link for this rulemaking and follow the instructions on the Public Comment Form. 
•Mail: Send to Christopher 
Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581. 
•Hand Delivery/Courier: Follow the 
same instructions as for Mail, above. 
Please submit your comments using 
only one of these methods. Submissions through the CFTC Comments Portal are encouraged. 
All comments must be submitted in 
English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP1