61527 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 
18See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. transactions. If either respondent’s 
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific or customer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review, and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.
18 
For any respondent that was not 
selected for individual examination in this administrative review, including the Vietnam-wide entity, Commerce will instruct, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise at the rate of $0.14 per kilogram. 
Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a 
timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). 
Cash Deposit Requirements 
The following cash deposit 
requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the exporters listed above, the cash 
deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is de minimis, in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously-examined Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese exporters not listed above that at the time of entry are eligible for a separate rate base on a prior completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to the be the existing exporter-specific cash deposit rate; (3) for all non-Vietnamese exporters of subject merchandise which at the time of entry do not have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Vietnamese exporter that supplied the non-Vietnamese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Final Results of Review 
Unless otherwise extended, 
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 
Notification to Importers 
This notice serves as a preliminary 
reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. 
Notification to Interested Parties 
We are issuing and publishing the 
preliminary results of this review in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 
Dated: August 31, 2023. 
Lisa W. Wang, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance. 
Appendix I 
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
I. Summary 
II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Standing V. Intent To Rescind the Review, In Part VI. Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments 
VII. Discussion of the Methodology VIII. Recommendation 
Appendix II 
Companies for Which Commerce Intends To Rescind the Review 
Bien Dong Seafood Company Ltd. (also 
known as Bien Dong, Bien Dong Seafood, 
Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd., Biendong Seafood Co., Ltd., Bien Dong Seafood Limited Liability Company or Bien Dong Seafoods Co., Ltd.) 
C.P. Vietnam Corporation (also known as C.P. 
Vietnam Corp.) 
Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited (also 
known as DATHACO, Dai Thanh Seafoods or Dai Thanh Seafoods Co., Ltd.) 
East Sea Seafoods LLC (also known as East 
Sea Seafoods Limited Liability Company, ESS LLC, ESS, ESS JVC, or East Sea Seafoods Joint Venture Co., Ltd.) 
Hai Huong Seafood Joint Stock Company 
(also known as HHFish, HH Fish, or Hai Huong Seafood) NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (also 
known as NTSF, NTSF Seafoods or Ntsf 
Seafoods Jsc) 
PREFCO Distribution, LLC. Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (also 
known as Vinh Quang, Vinh Quang Fisheries Corp., Vinh Quang Fisheries Joint Stock Company, or Vinh Quang Fisheries Co., Ltd.) 
Appendix III 
Companies With No Shipments During the 
POR 
Fatifish Company Limited (also known as 
FATIFISH or FATIFISHCO or Fatfish Co., 
Ltd.) 
GF Seafood Corp. Green Farms Seafood JSC GODACO Seafood Joint Stock Company (also 
known as GODACO, GODACO Seafood, GODACO SEAFOOD, GODACO_SEAFOOD, or GODACO Seafood J.S.C.) 
Golden Quality Seafood Corporation (also 
known as Golden Quality, GoldenQuality, GOLDENQUALITY, or GoldenQuality Seafood Corporation) 
Green Farms Seafood Joint Stock Company 
(also known as Green Farms, Green Farms Seafood JSC, GreenFarm SeaFoods Joint Stock Company, or Green Farms Seafoods Joint Stock Company) 
Nam Viet Corporation (also known as 
NAVICO) 
Nha Trang Seafoods, Inc. (also known as Nha 
Trang Seafoods-F89, Nha Trang Seafoods, or Nha Trang Seaproduct Company) 
QMC Foods, Inc. QVD Food Co., Ltd.* 
* This is a collapsed entity comprised of 
QVD Food Co., Ltd, QVD Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. (also known as Dong Thap or QVD DT), and Thuan Hung Co., Ltd. (also known as THUFICO). 
[FR Doc. 2023–19337 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
National Institute of Standards and 
Technology 
[Docket No.: 230818–0199] 
Request for Information on Implementation of the United States Government National Standards Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technology (USG NSSCET) 
AGENCY : National Institute of Standards 
and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 
ACTION : Notice; request for information. 
SUMMARY : NIST is seeking information 
on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Government to support the development of an implementation plan for the United States Government National Standards Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technology (USG NSSCET). The USG NSSCET is intended to support and complement existing private sector-led 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Sep 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES161528 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 
activities and plans, including the 
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) United States Standards Strategy (USSS), with a focus on critical and emerging technology(ies) (CET). The USG NSSCET reinforces the U.S. Government’s support of a private sector-led, open, consensus-based international standards system, corresponding to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee decision that articulates and elaborates on principles that are fundamental to the development of an international standards: transparency; openness; impartiality and consensus; effectiveness and relevance; and coherence. 
To inform the USG NSSCET 
implementation, including how to best partner with relevant stakeholders, NIST is requesting information that will support the identification and prioritization of key activities that will optimize the USG NSSCET implementation and further enhance the U.S. Government’s ability to support a private sector-led, open, consensus- based international standards system, to which the U.S. Government is an active stakeholder and participant. 
DATES : Comments must be received by 
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 6, 2023. 
ADDRESSES : 
•Electronic submission: Submit 
electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. 
1. Go to www.regulations.gov and 
enter NIST–2023–0005 in the search field. 
2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon 
and complete the required fields. 
3. Enter or attach your comments. 
Comments containing references, 
studies, research, and other empirical 
data that are not widely published should include copies of the referenced materials. All submissions, including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. 
All comments responding to this 
document will be a matter of public record. Relevant comments will generally be available on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. After the 
comment period closes, relevant comments will generally be available on www.standards.gov. NIST will not 
accept comments accompanied by a request that part or all of the material be treated confidentially because of its business proprietary nature or for any other reason. Therefore, do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive, protected, or 
personal information, such as account numbers, Social Security numbers, or names of other individuals. 
For Public Meetings/Webcast: NIST 
may hold a series of ‘‘Listening Sessions’’ or ‘‘Stakeholder Events’’ in support of the USG NSSCET implementation. Information on these and any other NIST-sponsored events in connection with the USG NSSCET implementation will be announced at www.standards.gov. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : For 
questions about this notice please contact: Jennifer L. Marshall, Deputy Director, Standards Coordination Office (SCO), NIST via email at sco@nist.gov or 
by phone at (301) 975–3396. Please 
direct all media inquiries to Public Affairs Office (PAO), NIST via email at inquires@nist.gov or by phone at (301) 
975–2762. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : NIST is 
seeking information on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Government to support the development of an implementation plan for the United States Government National Standards Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technology (USG NSSCET). The USG NSSCET is intended to support and complement existing private sector-led activities and plans, including the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) United States Standards Strategy (USSS), with a focus on critical and emerging technology(ies) (CET). The U.S. standards development system is unique because it is built upon a wide variety of processes that are open, voluntary, decentralized, and led by the private sector. These processes feature openness to participation by materially interested stakeholders with consensus-based decision making. Finalized standards are primarily published by private sector standards organizations, not the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government supports standards development activities in accordance with the World Trade Organization (WTO) Technical Barriers to Trade Committee decision that articulates principles including transparency, openness, impartiality and consensus, effectiveness, relevance, and coherence. The USG NSSCET reinforces the U.S. Government’s support of a private sector-led, open, consensus-based international standards system, to which the U.S. Government is an active stakeholder and participant. To inform the USG NSSCET implementation, including how to best partner with relevant stakeholders, NIST is requesting information that will support the identification and prioritization of key activities that will optimize the USG NSSCET implementation and further enhance the U.S. Government’s ability to support a private sector-led, open, consensus- based international standards system. In addition to other agencies and Departments, bureaus across the U.S. Department of Commerce are involved in the USG NSSCET. They include the International Trade Administration (ITA), the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 
CET covered under the USG NSSCET 
include, but are not limited to: 
•Communication and Networking 
Technologies 
•Semiconductors and 
Microelectronics, including 
Computing, Memory, and Storage Technologies 
•Artificial Intelligence and Machine 
Learning 
•Biotechnologies 
•Positioning, Navigation, and Timing 
Services 
•Digital Identity Infrastructure and 
Distributed Ledger Technologies 
•Clean Energy Generation and Storage 
•Quantum Information Technologies 
There are also specific applications of 
CET that departments and agencies have determined will impact our global economy and national security. These include, but are not limited to: 
•Automated and Connected 
Infrastructure 
•Biobanking 
•Automated, Connected, and 
Electrified Transportation 
•Critical Minerals Supply Chains 
•Cybersecurity and Privacy 
•Carbon Capture, Removal, Utilization, 
and Storage 
A full list of CETs identified by the 
National Science and Technology 
Council (NSTC) can be found https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2022/02/02-2022-Critical-and- Emerging-Technologies-List-Update.pdf. 
The national interest in CET and 
associated areas of standardization demands a new and urgent level of coordination and effort. National policy priorities, as expressed in legislation and other statements of policy, will require new ways for public sector and private sector (i.e., industry, including 
start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) stakeholders to cooperate in order to advance U.S. economic competitiveness and national security. 
NIST is seeking comments on the 
following questions and encourages 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Sep 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES161529 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 
responses from the public, including 
key stakeholders from the private sector (i.e., industry, including start-ups and 
SMEs, academic community, and civil society organizations), standards developing organizations (SDOs), and international partners. The questions reflect the four Objectives in the USG NSSCET. However, the questions are not intended to limit the topics that may be addressed. Responses may include any topic believed to have implications for the implementation of the USG NSSCET. 
When responding, commenters may 
address the practices of their organization(s) or a group of organizations with which they are familiar. Commenters may also provide information about the type, size, and location of the organization(s). Provision of such information is optional and will not affect NIST’s consideration. 
General Questions 
1. Are there potential benefits, 
opportunities, or risks associated with 
increased U.S. participation in standards development activities for CET? 
2. What are the potential risks or 
implications of decreased U.S. participation in standards development activities for CET? 
3. What are the most important 
challenges faced by the private sector (i.e., industry, including start-ups and 
small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) when participating in standards development activities for CET, and how can these challenges be addressed? 
USG NSSCET Objective 1: Investment 
4. How can the U.S. Government 
establish policies that promote 
standards development for CET as a critical component of U.S. innovation culture? 
5. How can the U.S. Government 
utilize Federal spending on research and development to drive technical contributions for CET standards development activities? 
6. How can the U.S. Government 
facilitate the adoption of standards- based CET by industry stakeholders, including start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? 
7. How can the U.S. Government 
better support publicly funded and private research in standards development activities for CET? 
USG NSSCET Objective 2: Participation 
8. How can the U.S. Government 
increase the amount and consistency of 
private sector (i.e., industry, including start-ups and small- and medium-sized 
enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) engagement in standards development activities for CET? 
9. How can the U.S. Government 
improve communications among the 
public and private sector (i.e., industry, 
including start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) to address potential participation gaps in standards development activities for CET? 
10. How can the U.S. Government 
foster early collaboration with private sector (i.e., industry, including start-ups 
and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) stakeholders to identify standards for CET that would encourage market and regulatory acceptance as needed? At what stage is early collaboration most effective? 
11. What roles do the academic 
community and civil society organizations play in standards development activities for CET, and how can they increase their contributions to a private sector-led system? 
12. How can the U.S. Government 
better support state, local, and tribal governments in participating in standards development activities for CET? 
USG NSSCET Objective 3: Workforce 
13. How can the U.S. Government 
leverage existing or develop new digital 
tools and resources that facilitate access to standards development processes, and increase engagement by private sector (i.e., industry, including start-ups 
and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) CET stakeholders? 
14. How can the U.S. Government 
incentivize the modification of existing curricula and/or the creation of new curricula, to include faculty professional development, by educational institutions for pedagogy to support standards development activities for CET? 
15. What standards development 
activities for CET can U.S. government and private sector (i.e., industry, 
including start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) stakeholders promote or develop to encourage increased participation by students and trainees? 
16. How can the U.S. Government 
support both private sector and public sector recognition for standards development expertise and how can this recognition be utilized to increase standards development activities for CET? 
USG NSSCET Objective 4: Integrity and 
Inclusivity 
17. How can the U.S. Government 
work with private sector (i.e., industry, 
including start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), academic community, and civil society organizations) stakeholders to more effectively coordinate with international partners and reinforce private sector-led standards development activities for CET? 
18. How should the U.S. Government 
share information on standards development activities for CET with like-minded partners and allies? 
19. What standards information and 
tools can the U.S. government develop and promote to ensure U.S. exporters can compete in global markets for CET? 
20. How can the U.S. Government 
further advance the design and implementation of technical assistance programs for CET that enable broad and inclusive participation by developing countries in international SDOs? 
21. How can the U.S. Government 
work with international partners to ensure that standards for CET are developed in a way that supports U.S. interests, including a commitment to free and fair market competition in which the best technologies come to market? 
22. How can the U.S. Government 
make the United States a more desirable location to hold international standards meetings, events, and activities for CET? 
Alicia Chambers, 
NIST Executive Secretariat. 
[FR Doc. 2023–19245 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration 
[RTID 0648–XD161] 
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Hearings; Correction 
AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries 
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 
ACTION : Notice of correction to public 
hearings and webinars. 
SUMMARY : The Gulf of Mexico Fishery 
Management Council (Council) will hold two virtual/webinar public 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:19 Sep 06, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1