WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
4 December 2020  
(20-8735) Page: 1/10 
General Council  Original: English  
 
STRENGTHENING THE WTO TO PROMOTE DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUSIVITY  
COMMUNICATION FROM THE AFRICAN GROUP , CUBA AND INDIA  
Revision  
The following communication, dated 3 December 2020, is being circulated at the request of the 
African Group, Cuba and India . 
 
_______________  
 
 
1  IMBALANCES AND DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AT THE WTO  
1.1.  The Uruguay Round was concluded with many imbalances in the rul es for developing countries. 
Over the course of time, these imbalances have become even more problematic for developing 
countries many of whom were already facing financial crisis before the onset of COVID -19. Unlike 
the previous financial crises, the COVI D-19 pandemic exerted a much more radical and abrupt effect 
on both supply and demand, putting the real economy to a halt.    
1.2.  The preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the WTO recognizes that international 
trade is not an end in itself, but a mea ns towards 'raising standards of living and ensuring full 
employment'. More importantly, it recognizes that 'there is a need for positive efforts designed to 
ensure that developing countries, and especially the least developed among them, secure a share 
in the growth in international trade commensurate with the needs of their economic development'.  
1.3.  For the fulfilment of these founding objectives of the WTO, all Members, no matter their trade 
share, must have an equal say in decision -making.  
1.4.  Throughout its history, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has experienced a number of 
challenges. Recently, some of these relate to a wider 'crisis of multilateralism', but others can be 
understood as the result of a confluence of factors rooted in the le gal commitments that WTO 
Members undertook at the establishment of the Organization in 1995. Specifically, inequities and 
imbalances in some of the existing multilateral trade rules have provided an inherent advantage 
mainly to the developed Members. Thus,  whilst WTO rules such as those on border trade measures 
have helped developing countries by providing certainty to trade, more often than not, developing 
Members found themselves constrained from pursuing their development and industrialization 
objectives  due to other rules which have been overly intrusive or imbalanced. TRIPS rules, for 
instance, have facilitated monopoly rents, and diminished the possibility for technology transfer. The 
TRIMS Agreement has disallowed Members to use local content requirem ents. The Subsidies 
Agreement constrains the policy space developing countries need to nurture their industries. 
However, it has allowed advanced economies to provide substantial support throughout their 
industrialization  history, and yet they are using th em now to encourage the reshoring of traditional 
manufacturing and to keep the leading position in emerging industries including high -tech, 
knowledge -intensive industries deemed critical to their future prosperity. The Agreement on 
Agriculture has allowed developed countries to continue their high subsidies on agriculture products, 
including those exported to developing countries, impacting their small farmers' livelihoods and food 
security. This has been compounded by the lack of inclusiveness and transpar ency in the process of 
WTO negotiations.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 2 - 
 
  1.5.  Developing Members have called for certain reforms in the WTO since 1996 in an effort to 
address asymmetries and bring balance to the WTO rules, as well as create more policy space for 
themselves to pursue developm ent and to use the same policy tools as developed countries to 
industrialize. The reform agenda put forth by developing Members was incorporated into the Doha 
Development Agenda in 2001. This included the strengthening of Special and Differential Treatment  
Provisions, Implementation Issues, addressing the existing asymmetries in the WTO Agreements, 
particularly in Agriculture with a view to facilitating the realization of the SDGs on food security and 
alleviation of rural poverty. As well as agreement that the TRIPS Agreement does not and should 
not prevent members from taking measures to protect public health.  However, increasingly the WTO 
is moving away from the principles entailed in the Marrakesh Agreement and the negotiations 
mandate contained in the Do ha Development Agenda which sought to place the needs and interests 
of developing countries at the heart of the Work Programme.  
1.6.  In the last two years, some Members have suggested a broad range of reforms at the WTO 
including a slate of new rules, even thou gh existing mandates from the DDA remain unaddressed. 
'WTO reform' does not mean accepting either inherited inequities or new proposals that 
would worsen imbalances. Reforms must be premised on the principles of inclusivity and 
development  and respond to t he underlying causes of the current backlash against trade and the 
difficulties that developing Members continue to face vis-à-vis their industrialization challenges.  
Inclusivity would require, at a minimum, preserving consensus decisions in the WTO.  
1.7.  In addition to these challenges, the WTO is now confronting immediate existential crises: The 
resort to unilateral and protectionist measures and the breakdown of the Appellate Body (AB). 
Clearly reform is needed in these areas.  
1.8.  Through this concept paper, we  seek to identify the issues that must  be addressed if the WTO 
is to be strengthened in a balanced manner. In some areas, no change may be required but simply 
a reinforcement of existing rules and architecture as some of the existing foundational WTO rules  
are currently being sought to be changed or adjusted. The final section of this paper will address 
COVID -19 and how the WTO must be strengthened to support developing countries in their response 
to this very serious pandemic and economic crisis.  
1.9.  In variou s discussions, the functions of the WTO has sometimes been looked at from the 
viewpoint of 3 areas. We will also use this categorization for this paper:  
a. The negotiating function of the WTO.  
b. The dispute settlement function.  
c. The monitoring function of regu lar bodies.  
A. THE NEGOTIATING FUNCTION OF THE WTO  
The WTO serves as a forum negotiate, administer and monitor WTO agreements, including further 
negotiations concerning multilateral trade relations as decided by the Ministerial Conference. The 
negotiatin g function of the WTO is underpinned by the following:  
 
a. the core principles of the Multilateral Trading System including rules on decision -making 
and how amendments are made;  
b. the Special and Differential Treatment architecture; and  
c. rule-making and the cen tral role of development.  
2  PRESERVING CORE PRINCIPLES OF THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM  
2.1.  Recent actions by some WTO Members indicate a weakening of commitment to the multilateral 
trading system. Preserving and strengthening the WTO must include:  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 3 - 
 
  2.2.  First, laws and regulations of WTO Members which mandate unilateral action on trade issues 
that are inconsistent with WTO rules would need to be amended. This will ensure that WTO Members 
are not perpetually under threat of unilateral action on trade issue s by some Members.  
2.3.  Second, the following rules in the Marrakesh Agreement are fundamental and must be 
respected:  
a. Articles II and III on the multilateral functions of the WTO;  
b. Article IX on the continuation of the practice of decision -making by consensus;  
c. Article X – when there are amendments (additions or changes) to WTO rules, there must 
be consensus, followed by ratification by Members. New rules enter into force only when 
the ratification numbers required have been attained.  
2.4.  Third, multilateral avenues,  based on consensus, remain the most effective means to achieve 
inclusive development -oriented outcomes. In the post -MC 11 phase, many Members have evinced 
interest in pursuing outcomes in some areas through joint statement initiatives (JSIs). Provisions 
governing plurilateral agreements in the Marrakesh Agreement must be adhered to. If they are to 
be multilateral agreements, the outcomes of these initiatives, by way of new rules, can be introduced 
into the WTO when there is consensus; and Art. X of the Mar rakesh Agreement on amendments 
must govern any changes or additions to the WTO Agreement. The JSIs should not change the 
fundamental multilateral architecture of WTO and should not change consensus -decision making - a 
key principle that should continue to g overn multilateral relations.  In addition, JSIs should be without 
prejudice to the rights and obligations of non -participating Members in WTO Agreements.  
3  THE ARCHITECTURE OF SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT MUST BE PRESERVED  
3.1.  Special and Differential Treatment (S&D) is a treaty -embedded and non -negotiable right for all 
developing Members.1 The available data indicates that the gap in the standards of living between 
developing and developed countries has not narrowed since the establishmen t of WTO.2 In fact, the 
GDP per capita between developed and developing countries has widened considerably.  
GDP PER CAPITA IN CURRENT US$ OF SELECTED COUNTRIES AND 
COUNTRY GROUPS 1980 -2017  
  
 
Source: World Bank , https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD  
 
1 See WT/GC/202/Rev.1 . 
2 See WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2 . 
WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 4 - 
 
  3.2.  Most of the world 's poor also live in non -LDCs: 61.8 per  cent (non -LDCs) versus  38.2 per  cent 
(in LDCs). These non -LDCs are called the "new bottom billion".3,4 
3.3.  The development gap between developed and developing countries continues to be very wide.5 
This necessitates the preservation and strengthening of the S&D provisions in both current and 
future WTO agreements, with priority to outstanding LDC issues.  
3.4.  The purs uit of S&D does not mean that developing countries are seeking unlimited carve -outs 
from the MTS. Developing countries have consistently made a contribution to international trade 
commensurate with their level of development. This contribution is recognize d and was 
acknowledged as far back as the Marrakesh Declaration of 15 April 1994 that acknowledged the 
notable active role played by developing countries in delivering on the wide mandate of the Uruguay 
Round, including the significant measures of economic  reform and autonomous trade liberalization 
implemented by developing countries.   
3.5.  There is an indivisible relationship between developing country status and special and 
differential treatment . Any unilateral action depriving developing Members including LDCs of treaty -
embedded rights would be inconsistent with Members ' obligations, and would in fact erode the 
foundation of the multilateral trading system which functions on the basis of being 'rules-based '. 
This will cause lasting and systemic damage to the trading system.6  
3.6.  Thus the following principles must be upheld:  
• Developing countries ' unconditional rights to S&D must continue;  
• Developing countries must be allowed to make their own assessm ents regarding their own 
developing country status (self -determination);  
• Existing S&D provisions must be upheld;  
• S&D must be provided in current and future negotiations.7 
4  RULES MUST SAFEGUARD DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS  
4.1.  The multilateral trading system must give policy space for developing Members to fulfil their 
development goals including industrialization. Developing Members continue to confront many 
formidable challenges and capacity constraints, which underscores the continued relevance of S&DT 
provisions in their favour.  
4.2.  The long -awaited outstanding 'development' issues from the Doha Round continue to be 
paramount and include:  
• Implementation Issues8 – aimed at rebalancing the imbalanced rules from the Uruguay Round 
such as in the areas of agriculture, TRIMS  (Trade Related Investment Measures), TRIPS (Trade 
Related Intellectual Property Rights), Subsidies Agreement9 etc. Developing countries should 
be enabled to support their industries under the Subsidies Agreement. Developed countries 
are doing so through stimulus packages and incentives for manufacturing and reshoring of 
medical and related products. Local content requirements are another critical policy 
instrument – hence the need for flexibilities under the TRIMS Agreement and GATT articles III 
 
3 See WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2 . 
4 See Bellagio I nitiative on "Poverty in Middle -Income Countries ", in November 2011, 
www.cbm.org/article/downloads/82788/Summary_Poverty_in_MIC.pdf , accessed on 25 January 2019.  
5 A broad range of these statistics are provided in WT/GC /W/765/Rev.2 . 
6 This paragraph is from WT/GC/202/Rev.1 ‘Statement on Special and Differential Treatment to Promote 
Development’, Cosponsored by the African Group, the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Cambodia, China, Cuba, 
India, Lao People’s Democratic Rep ublic, Oman, Pakistan and the Bolivarian Republic  of Venezuela, 14 October 
2019.  
7 This paragraph is also from WT/G/202/Rev.1, ibid.  
8 Developing countries' requests are contained in the Implementation issues agenda or Para. 12 of the 
Doha Declaration, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 . 
9 See Para. 5.8 of the developing country submission WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 5 - 
 
  and XI. T here must be more technology transfer and access to technologies i.e. the TRIPS 
agreement needs re -examination. WTO safeguards and countervailing duties should well 
address developing members ' concerns and be accessible.  There should also be fewer 
conditions and constraints on the use of GATT Art . XVIII particularly regarding assistance to 
infant industries and balance of payments difficulties.  
• Special and Differential Treatment (S&D) – strengthening and making effective and 
operational the S&D pro visions in WTO Agreements, in accordance with paragraph 44 of the 
Doha Declaration.  
• Cotton – the imbalances in Agriculture Domestic Support due to AMS beyond de minimis  must 
be addressed. These supports, leading to subsidized exports by some, show up clear ly in the 
area of cotton, where cotton prices have been depressed. This has impacted negatively on 
rural livelihoods and employment across many developing countries including the C4 
Members.  
• Public Stockholding (PSH) – a permanent solution must be agreed upon and adopted by MC12 
which contains less onerous safeguard conditions, including less exacting transparency 
requirements. It must also allow for new programmes to be covered.  
• Special Safeguard Mechanism – Ministers in Nairobi (MC10, 2015) mandated Mem bers 'To 
pursue negotiations on an SSM for developing country Members in dedicated sessions of the 
Committee on Agriculture in Special Session'. An effective and easy to use SSM should be 
adopted in MC12.  
• Agriculture Domestic Supports – to rectify the imba lances in the existing rules due to some 
Members having Aggregate Measures of Support (AMS) entitlements whilst others do not. 
High per farmer subsidies by OECD countries, with huge flexibility continue to have serious 
implications on food insecurity and r ural poverty in developing countries.10 The first step - 
eliminating Aggregate Measures of Support (AMS) entitlements is urgent, with S&D for 
developing Members.  
4.3.  In addition to the issues mentioned above, work should also continue on the following issues 
emphasizing the development components and in accordance with existing mandates:  
• Fisheries Subsidies – in accordance with the Doha, Hong Kong and MC11 Ministerial 
Declarations. All of these emphasize the importance of S&D in the outcome of these 
negotiation s because of the 'importance of this sector to development priorities, poverty 
reduction, and livelihood and food security concerns.11 SDG 14.6 also reinforces S&D. Due to 
the COVID crisis which continues to unfold across many developing countries, the con clusion 
of the negotiations should be based on meaningful progress made that fulfills  the mandate set 
out in SDG 14.6.  
• E-Commerce discussions under the 1998 Work Programme12 - E-commerce and digital trade 
must be pursued in an inclusive manner or it will e xacerbate existing imbalances in global 
trade. COVID -19 has demonstrated the importance of the 1998 Work Programme and the 
need to address the digital divide. We must reinvigorate the work under the Work Programme 
to inform decision -making in MC12. This ne cessitates that all the relevant bodies take up this 
discussion based on their mandate, so as to make progress by MC12. We must also prioritise 
the work of the CTD that is mandated to discuss the developmental aspects that are key to 
ensuring inclusive par ticipation in the digital economy.  
Particularly important is the issue of the E -Commerce moratorium. As more goods are 
transmitted electronically, i) the loss of customs duties and ii) loss of  the possibility to use 
tariffs to support domestic industries,  will be increasingly costly. It is important for the 
Membership to come to a common understanding on the scope of the moratorium. Without 
 
10 See Graph 5 of WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2 for a comparison of agriculture subsidies between some developed 
and developing Members.  
11 WT/MIN(05)/DEC 2005  'Hong Kong Ministerial  Declaration', Annex D para. 9.   
12 WT/L/274 1998 'Work Programme on Electronic Commerce' adopted by the General Council on 
25 September 1998.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 6 - 
 
  clarity on this, there can be no predictability for business, trade and industry. Importantly, 
Members would also not  know their obligations and rights. Only a clear understanding on 
scope and an appreciation of its impact would help Ministers take a well -considered decision 
at MC12.  
 
4.4.  Another issue that must be addressed in any reform process relates to the alleged theft of 
traditional knowledge that is held, preserved and developed by traditional communities/indigenous 
people. The rules of the multilateral trading system must also support developing countries in 
building their technological capacities, and t heir access to affordable medicines and medical 
technologies.  
4.5.  The SDGs articulate important development challenges still confronting developing countries, 
including overcoming poverty and hunger. WTO rules must be supportive, rather than a constraint 
to these efforts.  
B. THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT FUNCTION OF THE WTO  
5  RESOLVING THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ISSUES  
5.1.  A functioning, independent and effective dispute settlement system is indispensable for 
preserving the rights and obligations of all WTO Members and for ensu ring that the rules are enforced 
in a fair and even -handed manner. Hence, a sine qua non  for strengthening the WTO system is the 
restoration of the Appellate Body. This is an urgent priority since without such a system the rationale 
for negotiating new rul es or to undertake reforms remains questionable. Therefore,  the resumption  
of the appointment process of the Appellate Body members must be high on the agenda of reforms 
and in fact needs to precede other reforms.  
5.2.  As per Articles 17.1 and 17.2 of the DSU, all WTO Members have a collective duty to ensure 
the maintenance of a stan ding Appellate Body. It would be disingenuous to use the pretext of the 
Appellate Body's alleged digression from the clear mandate of the DSU to justify wilful non -
compliance with the same by the Membership . 
5.3.  Attempts at addressing the crisis in the dispute  settlement system must preserve its essential 
features namely an independent, two -tier dispute settlement system, automaticity in the launch of 
proceedings and  decision -making by the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) by negative consensus, 
where provided. Dev eloping Members' concerns about affordability and equitable access to the use 
of the dispute settlement system are also very important.  
5.4.  The priority for the membership must be to find a permanent multilateral solution. Abandoning 
Appellate Body will fragm ent the dispute settlement system and will have a negative impact on the 
balance of rights and obligations that have been carefully negotiated in the DSU.  A two -stage dispute 
settlement system is essential to ensure security and predictability of the multi lateral trading system, 
including prompt, efficient and effective resolution of disputes to the benefit of all Members.  
C. THE MONITORING FUNCTION OF REGULAR BODIES  
The functioning of its Councils and Committees i.e. the regular work of the WTO, was carefu lly 
negotiated in the Uruguay Round. Mandates were agreed to. These were negotiated outcomes that 
must be respected.  
 
6  NO ADDITIONAL TRANSPARENCY AND NOTIFICATIONS OBLIGATIONS UNDER 
EXISTING AGREEMENTS  
6.1.  Developing countries face challenges in complying with  all their notification obligations due to 
human resource and institutional capacity constraints. Any non -compliance is not willful. Treaty 
obligations must be performed in good faith. Yet despite the best of intentions, the ability to fulfill 
all notifica tion obligations inevitably depends on capacities that are commensurate with a Member's 
level of development and resources available. In light of these difficulties, we do not agree to 
additional transparency obligations. Any work in this area must be in t he provision of capacity 
building to developing countries.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 7 - 
 
  6.2.  Developed Members themselves should lead by example in submitting comprehensive, timely 
and accurate notifications. They have not always done so, as seen below. Given this, surely the 
resources co nstraints of developing countries should be well appreciated?  
• In the area of Agriculture, developed Members, as they have Final Bound AMS entitlements 
should submit their notifications within 3 months of the end of the year (calendar, marketing 
or fiscal y ear).13 Many developed Members have taken up to two years or more to do so.  
• In the area of Services, GATS Art . III.3 requires Members to 'promptly and at least annually 
inform the Council for Trade in Services of the introduction of any new, or any changes to 
existing laws, regulations or administrative guidelines which significantly affect trade in 
services covered by its specific commitments under this Agreement '. Some developed 
Members have not been implementing this.14  
6.3.  Some Members have found in novative ways to undermine their WTO commitments, or not 
implement the spirit of those commitments. If the discussion on Transparency goes beyond 
addressing capacity issues, the first step must tackle the undermining of WTO commitments 
through:  
• Regular not ification of entry -related measures affecting existing Mode 4 commitments of 
Members;  
• Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement. Developed countries have a legal obligation in the area 
of technology transfer towards LDCs. More transparency would be supportive of  LDCs' efforts 
to build a viable technological base;  
• Disclosure of origin of traditional knowledge and genetic resources in patent applications;  
• Transparency in tariffs – non-ad valorem tariffs should be notified in ad valorem terms or 
converted to ad valo rem tariffs.  
6.4.  Transparency must also permeate the entire functioning of the WTO including:  
• Taking note of the resource constraints of small delegations and thus rationalizing meetings 
at the WTO so that there are no overlaps. In areas where there are active negotiations for 
outcomes, these meetings should as far as possible take place in formal mode. They should 
always be open, inclusive and transparent and take seriously the resource constraints of 
developing countries.  
• Ministerial Conferences (MCs) and the processes preceding them in Geneva. The basic 
principles and procedures for this Member -driven organization need to be agreed upon. For 
instance, all meetings in the MC, which is the body for decision -making, should be open to all 
Members without restricting the decision -making process to smaller Green Rooms.  
7  REGULAR COMMITTEES ARE ALREADY FU NCTIONING WELL  
7.1.  It has been suggested that there should be a 'strengthening ' of the WTO 's regular committees.  
7.2.  We support improving upon meeting arrangements: making available documents to be 
considered at a formal meeting available 15 days before the meeti ng; circulating at the end of each 
year, an indicative yearly schedule of meetings for each of the WTO bodies for the following year; 
and timely circulation of the agenda and minutes of meetings.  
7.3.  With regards to mandates for committees, these were careful ly negotiated in the Uruguay 
Round. We cannot give new mandates that upset the delicate balance that was struck.  
 
13 See p. 11 of G/AG/2, 1995 ‘Notification Requirements and Formats’ adopted by the Committee on 
Agriculture on 8 June 1995.  
14 See p. 6 of JOB(09)/10/Rev.10, 2020 ‘ Overview of Notifications Made Under Relevant GATS Provisions: 
Informal Note by the Secretariat’, 20 February.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 8 - 
 
  7.4.  There is also the suggestion to bring up trade concerns in every committee. Addressing specific 
trade concerns (STCs) is provided for under ce rtain agreements. Mainstreaming of STCs across all 
committees and councils is likely to prompt Members to raise STCs very frequently. This will increase 
the paralysis in the operation of the organization and will negatively impact developing countries 
who already do not have the capacity to cope with current challenges. We therefore do not believe 
that the horizontal implementation is acceptable.  
7.5.  The existing procedures already allow for trade concerns to be addressed. Additional obligations 
and onerous bu rdens on developing Members e.g. encouraging submission of written questions and 
replies within a specified period will overstretch our limited human and institutional capacities.  
7.6.  The WTO is a Member -driven organization. Chairs and the Secretariat must be  neutral. Their 
roles cannot be increased from their current mandates and functions.  
7.7.  The goals of development have not been raised in the discussion. Especially in the current 
COVID pandemic and economic crisis, discussions on the role of Regular Bodies mu st be seen 
through the lens of development.  
8  ALLOWING FOR DIFFERENT ECONOMIC MODELS  
8.1.  The objectives of the WTO were negotiated and are entailed in the Marrakesh Agreement. It is 
expected to contribute to strengthening the world economy and promote a rules b ased multilateral 
trading system, improve investment, employment, living -standards and income growth throughout 
the world in a fair and just manner.  
8.2.  The WTO consists of diverse countries with different levels of development, national challenges 
and develo pment priorities. Its contribution is important, distinct and clearly defined. It provides a 
legal framework for the conduct of international trade, a more effective and reliable dispute 
settlement mechanism and a forum for negotiations. The WTO was never conceptualized as a forum 
that will define nor change economic models of Members.  
8.3.  Whilst the role of the market is important, government policies are required to address market 
failures or to achieve development objectives. This is clearly seen in the cont ext of COVID -19 where 
many governments have stepped in to support businesses as well as give direction, incentives, and 
subsidies regarding production decisions. The role of the State is further amplified in a consensus 
resolution passed at the United Nati ons Human Right Council entitled 'The central role of the State 
in responding to pandemics and other health emergencies, and the socioeconomic consequences 
thereof in advancing sustainable development and the realization of all human rights ' 
(A/HRC/44/L.23 /Rev.1 of 15 July 2020).  
9  COVID -19 AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES – MEASURES TO ADDRESS THIS CRISIS  
9.1.  The world is facing its worst recession since the 1930s. Developing countries are 
disproportionately affected. The pandemic is exposing the fundamental weaknesses in our global 
system. The profound social and economic fragilities across developing countrie s, already very 
present pre -COVID, are now being exposed and further exacerbated with the crisis. These include 
entrenched poverty (SDG 1), hunger and food insecurity (SDG 2), lack of clean water and sanitation 
(SDG 6), weak economic growth and the absence  of decent work (SDG 8), pervasive inequalities 
(SDG 10).  
9.2.  Even prior to the crisis, developing countries were already experiencing deepening financial 
and debt vulnerabilities in the context of tepid economic growth, slowing trade, sluggish real 
investmen t and growing income inequalities. Almost half of poorer economies were assessed by the 
IMF to be at high risk of debt distress, or already in debt distress by end 2019. In 2018, the total 
debt of developing countries reached 191 per  cent of their combined  GDP, the highest level on 
record.15 The UNCTAD concludes that 'the current levels of reserves on average, cast a question 
mark over the ability of developing countries to stave off the C OVID -19 shock, in particular where 
 
15 UNCTAD 2020 'The Coronavirus Shock: A Story of another Global Crisis Foretold ', p. 5.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 9 - 
 
  reserve accumulation has occurred through borrowing rather than (or in addition to) export 
earnings '. COVID -19 thus exposes the importance of the trade, debt and finance nexus.  
9.3.  One hundred million people could be pushed into extreme poverty in 2020 (below $1.90 a day). 
A few more hundred m illion will join the ranks of the poor if the yardstick of $3.20 or $5.50 is used. 
We could see famines of historic proportions. Economic activity across the world has plummeted, 
and unemployment has soared. These impacts are especially bad for LDCs, Sub -Saharan Africa and 
countries in South Asia. 70 per  cent of LDC labour force is self -employed; 60 per  cent in South Asia 
are in the informal sector; and the same is true for over 60 per  cent in Sub -Saharan Africa. There is 
a need to preserve policy tools tha t are necessary to weather the health crises, promote economic 
recovery and economic resilience.16 
9.4.  The combination of very tight fiscal space, weak and fragile health care and social protection 
systems mean that developing countries will experience a much higher human and financial toll. Add 
to this the need to import specialised goods and services to deal with COVID -19 means that 
developing countries face huge pressures in their balance of payments situation.  
9.5.  There is a need to reflect on the role of the MTS in promoting economic recovery and in 
addressing the current and future health crisis. Multilateral cooperation is needed now more than 
ever to enable Members to effectively respond to the crisis based on their needs, one size fits all 
approaches are u nhelpful. Such cooperation should:  
a. ensure timely access to affordable medical products including the vaccine, diagnostic kits, 
PPE and ventilators;  
b. preserve policy tools to promote economic recovery;  
c. provide policy flexibility with a view to rebalance gl obal rules and national economic 
development imperatives; and  
d. ensure that trade rules support production -led growth, jobs and structural transformation.  
9.6.  Developing countries should preserve policy space to respond to the pandemic and to boost 
productive c apacity to respond to their development objectives and needs. This includes key policy 
tools such as tariffs and export restrictions which must be implemented in accordance with their 
obligations under the covered Agreements.  
A Moratorium on Trade Measures and Sufficient Flexibilities on Intellectual Property 
Disciplines  
9.7.  The severity of the COVID crisis requires that governments are enabled to take the measures 
needed to limit the human toll caused by the pandemic on their people.  
9.8.  The policy space is particularly important for developing countries since they lack the fiscal 
space developed Members have to support their economies and people such as through historically 
large stimulus packages. In contrast, developing countries have no other choice bu t to be more 
creative in their responses, including through the use of trade measures if these can be helpful. The 
trade regime should not penalize developing countries for taking action to support their citizens 
during such an extraordinarily difficult ti me. Developing countries should therefore be exempt from 
being taken to the WTO 's Dispute Settlement Body if they implement trade measures that are 
essential and necessary in response to the pandemic.  
9.9.  Such a moratorium on trade measures and flexibilities o n intellectual property disciplines shall 
have a clearly defined scope and should be maintained only temporarily for the duration of the 
COVID crisis. It is recognised that intellectual  property rights should be interpreted and implemented 
in a manner supp ortive of the right of members to protect public health, and in particular, to promote 
access to medicines for all and to ensure that IPRs are protected for the benefit of all.  
 
16 UNCTAD 2020 ibid.  WT/GC/W/778/Rev.3  
 
- 10 - 
 
  9.10.   The exact measures useful to individual Members to respond to the pandemic will  depend on 
their individual circumstances.  
10  IN CONCLUSION  
10.1.   The priorities for reform at the WTO must include:  
a. The negotiating function  of the WTO.  
• Strengthening the multilateral character of the WTO. Critically, this must include the 
preservation of consensus decision -making and respecting Art. X of the Marrakesh 
Agreement on Amendments with regards to new rules;  
• Addressing the unilateral and protec tionist actions taken by some Members;  
• Reaffirming the principle of Special and Differe ntial Treatment, which is a treaty -
embedded, non -negotiable right for all developing countries in the WTO; and promoting 
inclusive growth, widening spaces for states to pursue national development strategies in 
the broad framework and principles of a rules -based system;  
• Keeping development at its core through delivering on the long -promised development 
concerns, in particular the outstanding development issues of the DDA; as well as address 
the asymmetries in WTO Agreements such as those in Agriculture, the  Subsidies 
Agreement, TRIMS and the related GATT articles (Art . III and XI), TRIPS and other areas; 
continuing with the on -going multilaterally mandated negotiations; reinvigorating the 
discussions in the 1998 E -Commerce Work Programme particularly looking  at the E -
Commerce Moratorium and the issues of digital divide.  
b. The dispute settlement  function.  
• Restoring the Appellate Body and the two -tier WTO DSU.  
c. The monitoring function  of regular bodies.  
• Reaffirming existing commitments and not adding more obliga tions in the areas of 
transparency; specific trade concerns and the functioning of regular bodies. The WTO must 
also allow for different economic models rather than push for one form or another.  
d. COVID -19 
• Responding to the COVID -19 pandemic, including thro ugh introducing a Moratorium on 
trade measures and providing sufficient flexibilities on intellectual property disciplines for 
developing countries. Such a Moratorium will be in place for the duration of the pandemic 
for governmental action taken to direct ly respond to the pandemic. Unlike developed 
countries, developing countries without deep pockets must be more creative, including by 
using trade policy measures to provide medicines, diagnostics, health equipment, and to 
address the serious balance of pay ments crises many developing countries now find 
themselves in.  
• To address COVID -19, developing countries should not be asked to relinquish their 
required trade policy space such as through the permanent liberalization of tariffs or 
agreement to end the us e of export restrictions.  
 
__________