[image] [image] Ressource protégée - Université Clermont
Auvergne Accéder directement au contenu
*[image] [image]*

* [Documentation](#)

• FR
Français (FR)

• Anglais (EN)
Se connecter

• [Portail HAL Clermont Auvergne](#)

• Recherche
Loading...

Recherche avancée

Information de documents
Titres

○ Titres

○ Sous-titre

○ Titre de l'ouvrage

○ Titre du volume (Série)

○ Champ de recherche par défaut (multicritères) + texte
intégral des PDF

Résumé

○ Texte intégral indexé des documents PDF

○ Mots-clés

○ Type de document

○ Sous-type de document

○ Tous les identifiants du document

○ Identifiant HAL du dépôt

○ Langue du document (texte)

○ Pays (Texte)

○ Ville

○ À paraître (true ou false)

Ajouter

Auteur
# TRP Channels in Brain Tumors

Giorgia Chinigò, Hélène Castel, Oana Chever, Dimitra Gkika

► To cite this version:

Giorgia Chinigò, Hélène Castel, Oana Chever, Dimitra Gkika. TRP Channels in Brain Tumors. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2021, 9 (617801), pp.1-17. 10.3389/fcell.2021.617801. hal-04503098

HAL Id: hal-04503098

https://uca.hal.science/hal-04503098v1

Submitted on 4 Apr 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
## Auteur (multicritères)

○ Auteur (multicritères)

○ Auteur : Nom complet

○ Auteur : Nom de famille

○ Auteur : Prénom

○ Auteur : Complément de nom, deuxième prénom

○ Auteur : Organisme payeur

○ Auteur : IdHal (chaîne de caractères)

○ Auteur : Fonction

○ Auteur : personID (entier)

○ Auteur : Identifiant de l'organisme payeur

○ Auteur : Identifiant de la structure

○ Directeur de thèse

○ Éditeur

○ Éditeur scientifique

○ Éditeur de la série

## Ajouter

### Structure

### Structure (multicritères)

○ Structure (multicritères)

○ Structure : Acronyme

○ Structure : Nom

○ Structure : Code

○ Structure : Pays

○ Structure : Type

○ Structure : État dans le référentiel

○ Structure : Identifiant HAL de la structure

○ Structure/équipe de recherche : Pays

○ Structure/regroupement d'équipes : Pays

○ Structure/laboratoire : Pays

○ Structure/regroupement de laboratoires : Pays

○ Structure/institution : Pays

○ Structure/regroupement d'institutions : Pays

## Ajouter

## Autres
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# TRP Channels in Brain Tumors

Giorgia Chinigò<sup>1,2*</sup>, Hélène Castel<sup>3,4</sup>, Oana Chever<sup>3,4</sup> and Dimitra Gkika<sup>5,6*</sup>

OPEN ACCESS

**Edited by:**
Sandra Derouiche,
National Institute for Physiological
Sciences (NIPS), Japan

**Reviewed by:**
Giorgio Santoni,
University of Camerino, Italy
Peter S. Reinach,
Wenzhou Medical University, China
Massimo Nabissi,
University of Camerino, Italy
Maria Beatrice Morelli,
University of Camerino, Italy
Stefan Mergler,
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin,
Germany

*Correspondence:
Giorgia Chinigò
giorgia.chinigo@unito.it
Dimitra Gkika
dimitra.gkika@univ-lille.fr

**Specialty section:**
This article was submitted to
*Signaling,*
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental
Biology

Received: 15 October 2020

Accepted: 17 March 2021

Published: 13 April 2021

**Citation:**
Chinigò G, Castel H, Chever O and Gkika D (2021) TRP Channels in Brain Tumors. *Front. Cell Dev. Biol.* 9:617801. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.617801

Malignant glioma including glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common group of primary brain tumors. Despite standard optimized treatment consisting of extensive resection followed by radiotherapy/concomitant and adjuvant therapy, GBM remains one of the most aggressive human cancers. GBM is a typical example of intra-heterogeneity modeled by different micro-environmental situations, one of the main causes of resistance to conventional treatments. The resistance to treatment is associated with angiogenesis, hypoxic and necrotic tumor areas while heterogeneity would accumulate during glioma cell invasion, supporting recurrence. These complex mechanisms require a focus on potential new molecular actors to consider new treatment options for gliomas. Among emerging and underexplored targets, transient receptor potential (TRP) channels belonging to a superfamily of non-selective cation channels which play critical roles in the responses to a number of external stimuli from the external environment were found to be related to cancer development, including glioma. Here, we discuss the potential as biological markers of diagnosis and prognosis of TRPC6, TRPM8, TRPV4, or TRPV1/V2 being associated with glioma patient overall survival. TRPs-inducing common or distinct mechanisms associated with their Ca<sup>2+</sup>-channel permeability and/or kinase function were detailed as involving miRNA or secondary effector signaling cascades in turn controlling proliferation, cell cycle, apoptotic pathways, DNA repair, resistance to treatment as well as migration/invasion. These recent observations of the key role played by TRPs such as TRPC6 in GBM growth and invasiveness, TRPV2 in proliferation and glioma-stem cell differentiation and TRPM2 as channel carriers of cytotoxic chemotherapy within glioma cells, should offer new directions for innovation in treatment strategies of high-grade glioma as GBM to overcome high resistance and recurrence.

**Keywords:** ion channel, TRP channel, brain tumor, glioma, glioblastoma

## INTRODUCTION

Malignant gliomas are the most prevalent group of primary brain tumors in adults, with an incidence of 8.9 cases per 100,000 persons/year in the US (Ostrom et al., 2015, 2017). Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive human cancers. Glial tumors or glioma represent a wide spectrum of malignancies including grades II and III oligodendroglioma, grades II and III

<footnote n="1"><sup>1</sup> Laboratory of Cell Physiology, Department of Life Sciences, Univ. Lille, Inserm, U1003 - PHYCEL, University of Lille, Lille, France, <sup>2</sup> Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Angiogenesis, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy, <sup>3</sup> UNIROUEN, Inserm U1239, DC2N, Normandie Université, Rouen, France, <sup>4</sup> Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen, France, <sup>5</sup> CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Centre Oscar Lambret, UMR 9020-UMR 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France, <sup>6</sup> Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France</footnote>
Champ de recherche par défaut (multicritères)

○ <u>Champ de recherche par défaut (multicritères)</u>

○

○ <u>Revues (multicritères)</u>

○ <u>Revue : Éditeur</u>

○ <u>Revue : Titre abrégé</u>

○ <u>Revue : Titre</u>

○ <u>Revue : Identifiant interne</u>

○ <u>Revue : Date de début de publication</u>

○ <u>Revue : ISSN électronique</u>

○ <u>Revue : ISSN</u>

○ <u>Revue : Éditeur</u>

○ <u>Revue : Couleur dans SHERPA/RoMEO</u>

○ <u>Revue : État dans le référentiel</u>

○

○ <u>Colloque (multicritères)</u>

○ <u>Colloque : Titre</u>

○ <u>Colloque : Organisateur</u>

○ <u>Colloque : date de début (Année)</u>

○ <u>Colloque : date de fin (Année)</u>

○ <u>Conférence invitée (oui/non)</u>

○

○ <u>Projets ANR (multicritères)</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : Acronyme</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : Acronyme du programme</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : Code décision (référence)</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : Nom</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : Identifiant interne</u>

○ <u>Projet ANR : État dans le référentiel</u>

○

○ <u>Projets européens (multicritères)</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Acronyme</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Identifiant de l'appel à projet</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Référence</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Nom</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Date de fin</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Financement</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : Date de début</u>

○ <u>Projet européen : État dans le référentiel</u>
astrocytoma and glioblastoma from initial classification based on anatomocytopathological criteria related to the morphotypic characteristics and numerous cytonuclear atypologies, accompanied by anaplasia for high-grade glioma (GBM, grade IV) (Louis et al., 2007; Miller and Perry, 2007). The diagnosis of GBM was based on the presence of vascular micro-proliferations signs of intense vascularization, associated with zones of necrosis delimited by a hypoxic pseudopalissadic cellular zone, evidencing important intra-tumoral heterogeneity (Karsy et al., 2012; Aliferis and Trafalis, 2015). Now, brain tumors and glioma are classified according to the histomolecular classification recently published by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Louis et al., 2016), which represents a major clinical improvement for both diagnosis and treatments, as well as patient prognosis. The aim was to implement the histopathological classification with the following molecular signatures: first including the mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase1/2 (IDH1/2mut) and/or the co-deletion 1p/19q associated with oligodendroglioma or mutation of TP53; second the l'α-thalassemia mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATX) or amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were associated with GBM IDHwt; finally the hypermethylation of the O6-methyl guanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter constitutes an important parameter of the GBM aggressiveness (Louis et al., 2016).

Despite these molecular attempts to stratify glioma patients with the objective to allow personalization of the treatments, the median survival of GBM patients currently ranges from 15 to 17 months, despite a safe maximal surgical resection, radiation/concomitant and adjuvant alkylating-based chemotherapy by temozolomide (TMZ) (Stupp et al., 2005, 2009; Wen and Brandes, 2009). However, more than 95% of GBM recur in the margin of the resection cavity, an area in which glioma tumor cells acting as a tumor reservoir are found (Giese et al., 2003). This invasiveness associated with X-ray and/or intrinsic or acquired chemoresistance of the glioma cells and the presence of an intrinsic or acquired blood-brain barrier (BBB), limit the effectiveness and/or the delivery of anti-neoplastic agents and justify the development of new strategies. In agreement, over the last decade, despite very important advances in the field of targeted therapy, none of them, e.g., drug/antibody or combination of small molecule inhibitors, has been shown to be more effective than TMZ or capable of increasing the efficacy of standard therapy in patients with primary or recurrent GBM (Stepanenko and Chekhonin, 2018), and no curative treatment is currently identified in GBM. This failure may be explained at least in part by the intratumoral heterogeneity which is a conserved consequence of the GBM micro-environment (Prabhu et al., 2017), referring to the physico-chemical characteristics and matrices interacting with the tumor. Indeed, the GBM heterogeneity is tightly related to angiogenic and hypoxic features as well as invasive processes, thus future strategies should consider targeting mechanisms associated with resistance and invasion. In particular, Watkins et al. (2014) showed that GBM cells can thus control the regulation of vascular tone, via the release of K⁺ through K⁺ channels activated in response to Ca²⁺, leading to an adaptation of cell volume to facilitate their invasion.

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are a superfamily of cationic tetrameric channels, mostly permeable to Ca²⁺, involved in various physiological functions, and for the most part sustain calcium homeostasis and calcium signaling. Calcium-dependent mechanisms determine several aspects of brain tumor cell homeostasis including survival, proliferation, invasion or treatment resistance, making TRP channels putative potent modulators of tumorigenesis and glioma progression. Approximately 30 TRPs have been identified and are classified into TRPA (ankyrin family), TRPC (canonical family), TRPM (melastatin family), TRPN (NomPC family), TRPML (mucolipin family), TRPP (polycystin family), and TRPV (vanilloid family) (Li, 2017). These cationic channels have been shown to be gated by many physical or chemical stimuli (temperature, membrane potential, pH, hormones, vitamins ...). TRP channels are expressed in various excitable and non-excitable cell types and are present in many organs, including brain, heart, liver, lung, kidney, spleen, muscle, skin, pancreas (Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007). Since a decade, TRP channels have attracted much interest in the cancer field and tumorigenesis. Activities of TRP channels have been linked to cell growth, survival or migration, being involved in a plethora of cancers, especially for TRPC, TRPM, and TRPV (Prevarskaya et al., 2007; Gkika and Prevarskaya, 2009; Fiorio Pla and Gkika, 2013). Recent research unravels the role of some TRP channels in glioma growth and progression or glioma stem-like cell fate determination. In this review, we will mainly focus on a new class of molecular players, TRP channels emerging in gliomas and for which we will develop three aspects: (i) the expression profile and use as clinical markers; (ii) the molecular mechanisms through which they act; and (iii) their potential use in therapeutics.

## TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL (TRP) EXPRESSION PROFILE AND PUTATIVE BIOMARKERS

Changes in expression of TRP channels have been related to cancer development and progression, thus making them valuable diagnostic and/or prognostic markers in several tumor types, including glioma. Furthermore, a strong correlation between clinical-pathological findings and mRNA and/or protein expression of different TRPs has been recently provided. For instance, mRNA encoding TRPC1, TRPC6, TRPM7, TRPM8, TRPV4, and TRPML2 appeared up-regulated in GBM tumor specimens in comparison with normal tissues and their expression was found to increase with glioma tumor grade with the highest mRNA level found in GBM patient samples (Ding et al., 2010; Alptekin et al., 2015). These findings are consistent with a pro-tumorigenic role of these channels in glioma progression and aggressiveness, as described in more detail in the next paragraph. According to a qPCR screening of 33 GBM patient tumors, additional mRNA-encoding TRP channels including TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPV1, TRPV2 showed significantly higher expression levels in GBM compared with control normal brain tissues (Alptekin et al., 2015). However, other studies reported opposite results, more consistent with an
○ Projet européen : Identifiant interne

O

○ Date de production : année

○ Date de mise en ligne : année

○ Date de publication : année

○ Date d'écriture : année

○ Date de modification du dépôt : année

○ Date de dépôt : année

○ Date de publication électronique : année

O

○ Collection HAL (multicritères)

Collection HAL : catégorie

○ Collection HAL : Code

○ Collection HAL : Nom

○ Collection HAL : Identifiant interne

O

○ Identifiant interne du contributeur/déposant

○ Nom complet du contributeur/déposant

O

○ Domaines

○ Domaine primaire

○ Domaine racine

○ Sous-domaine niveau 1

○ Sous-domaine niveau 2

○ Sous-domaine niveau 3

O

○ Statut du document

○ Version du document

○ Type de dépôt

○ Type de document

○ ISBN

○ Numéro - référence

○ Identifiant DOI

O

○ Classification

○ Audience

○ Vulgarisation

○ Comité de lecture - texte (oui ou non)

○ Actes de colloque

○ Référence interne
anti-tumorigenic function of these channels, as confirmed by
several experimental data (Amantini et al., 2007; Nabissi et al.,
2010; Ying et al., 2013; Morelli et al., 2019). These discrepancies
could be due to the relatively low number of patients considered
in the first study (Alptekin et al., 2015), which may not be very
representative enough while further investigations should now
be reconsidered in light of the new molecular GBM patient
stratification and the methylome.

Among more than 20 TRP channels investigated, TRPM8
showed the highest mRNA upregulation in GBM as compared
with normal brain tissue (Alptekin et al., 2015; Zeng et al.,
2019), suggesting a pivotal function of TRPM8 in gliomagenesis.
Moreover, TRPM8 expression in human GBM specimens and
established GBM cell lines was found to be up-regulated at
both mRNA and protein level to a variable extent (Klumpp
et al., 2017) and to be significantly correlated with worse
patient overall survival (Zeng et al., 2019). Interestingly, it
was previously reported that TRPM8 is a primary androgen-
responsive gene since its promoter is located downstream an
androgen response elements (AREs) to which androgen receptor
(AR) may bind once activated by androgens thus promoting
TRPM8 expression (Bidaux et al., 2005; Asuthkar et al., 2015).
Therefore, TRPM8 overexpression in high-grade glioma might
be associated with the documented upregulation of AR in GBM
(Yu et al., 2015). Moreover, it has been recently found that AR
may also directly regulate TRPM8 channel activity via protein-
protein interaction and/or TRPM8 phosphorylation, further
accentuating the close TRPM8-androgens relationship (Grolez
et al., 2019a; Gkika et al., 2020). Similarly to TRPM8, TRPV4
has been shown to positively correlate with glioma progression,
since high levels of TRPV4 gene and protein expression were
associated with a poorer patient prognosis (Ou-yang et al.,
2018). Thus, TRPM8 and TRPV4 may be currently considered
promising biomarkers accompanying aggressiveness of glioma
and signature of GBM while constituting potential therapeutic
targets for future treatment options. TRPML2 expression was
also detected in normal astrocytes and neural stem/progenitor
cells and to be up-regulated at both mRNA and protein level
in glioma to a variable extent, increasing with the pathological
grade (Morelli et al., 2016). Such observation was linked to the
up-regulation of the transcriptional activator of the TRPML-
2 gene Paired box 5 (PAX5) (Valadez and Cuajungco, 2015)
found in human astrocytoma and correlated with malignancy and
pathological grade of glioma (Stuart et al., 1995).

Moreover, the loss of TRPM3, TRPV1, TRPV2, and TRPML1
expression has been proposed as a negative prognostic marker
for GBM patients, because of their significant and progressive
down-regulation as the tumor grade increases. For instance, a
study focusing on the role of miR-204 in high-grade glioma
cell lines has revealed a significant down-regulation of TRPM3,
due to the hypermethylation of its promoter (Ying et al., 2013).
Interestingly, miR-204 is an intronic miRNA located between
exons 7 and 8 of the TRPM3 gene and its loss in glioma, due to
the high methylation of its host gene TRPM3, is associated with
an enhancement in cell migration and cellular stemness (Ying
et al., 2013) questioning the direct role of TRPM3 and the indirect
regulatory functions of miR-204 via its target genes. Consistently,

restoration of miR-204 in LN382T and SNB19 cells orthotopically
xenografted in the brains of nude mice suppressed tumorigenesis
and invasiveness and increased animal survival (Ying et al., 2013).
Taken together, these findings might suggest a potential tumor-
suppressive function of TRPM3 in glioma, but further studies
are required to clarify its involvement in cancer development
and/or progression and to establish whether TRPM3 and miR-
204 might cooperate with each other in the pathogenesis of
gliomas. Concerning TRPV1 and TRPV2, the preventing role
in gliomagenesis and tumor progression has been more clearly
established and characterized (see next paragraph). First, TRPV1
and TRPV2 genes and protein expression appeared inversely
correlated with glioma grade, showing an almost undetectable
level in GBM (Amantini et al., 2007; Nabissi et al., 2010; Morelli
et al., 2016). In particular, a study performed by Nabissi and
coworkers has shown that GBM and glioma stem-like cells (GSC)
selectively express the TRPV1 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR)
variant three (TRPV1v3), one of the four variants resulting
from alternative first exon splicing (Nabissi et al., 2016). The
5'UTR can generate different transcripts encoding the same
protein but characterized by different stability and translation
efficacy (Audic and Hartley, 2004; Gebauer and Hentze, 2004;
Hinnebusch et al., 2016) and TRPV1v3 is the most stable TRPV1
5'UTR transcript. In GBM, the mRNA expression of the unique
TRPV1v3 variant correlates with the patient's survival, suggesting
that its loss or low mRNA expression may represent a potential
marker of poor prognosis in GBM patients (Nabissi et al., 2016).
Similarly, the clinical relevance of the overexpression of TRPV2
in GBM was confirmed through the analysis of the TRPV2-
interactome based signature using a systematic proteomics and
computational analysis approach (Doñate-Macián et al., 2018),
predicting GBM patient overall survival. Indeed, high TRPV2
interactome protein expression was correlated with tumor
progression, recurrence, TMZ-resistance and a poor prognosis
(Doñate-Macián et al., 2018). Finally, also TRPML1 might have
a potential role as a negative prognostic marker for GBM patients
(Morelli et al., 2019) since TRPML1 mRNA down-regulation or
loss strongly correlates with reduced overall survival in GBM
patients. However, additional studies are needed in order to
further investigate the relationship between TRPML1 expression
and lower glioma grades (Morelli et al., 2019). However,
TRPML1 expression at mRNA and protein levels displayed
variability within patient samples and its subcellular localization
may also be distinct since TRPML1 is mainly expressed in
the late endosome/lysosome of normal cells while found in
endolysosomes and as dot spots in the nuclear cell compartment
in glioma cells (Morelli et al., 2019). The mechanisms underlying
this nuclear localization in tumor cells and the effects of this
specific localization are not completely characterized, although it
has been shown that TRPML1 is able to bind DNA somehow and
thus, it might affect the transcription of some genes involved in
tumor progression (Morelli et al., 2019).

Together, these studies highlight that some TRPM, TRPV,
and/or TRPML channels overexpressed in glioma should be
considered as predictive and specific biomarkers of high-grade
glioma and GBM, and through changes in their permeability to
cations they may play a role in GBM aggressiveness.
○ Financement

○ Collaborations

Ajouter

Lancer la recherche

Recherche experte (SolR)

Recherche experte (SolR)

Lancer la recherche
Vers la recherche avancée

• Déposer

[image]

• Accueil

• Consulter

○ tous les dépôts

○ par collection

○ par type de document

○ par auteur

○ par période

○ par domaine

• Liens

○ UCA

○ BCU

○ HAL

X

X

X

Loading...

X

Le document avec l'identifiant n'est pas visible actuellement !
## MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF TRP CHANNELS ACTION

Transient receptor potential channels have revealed a direct involvement in determining many hallmarks of glioma and GBM (Table 1), including some typical histological cellular abnormalities (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008), its relentless growth, and its intrinsic severe aggressiveness due to its high capability to diffuse into the non-neoplastic brain parenchyma, which contributes to treatments resistance and bad prognosis (Demuth and Berens, 2004; Schwartzbaum et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2018). TRP channels may exert both anti-tumorigenic and pro-tumorigenic functions in gliomas and the main TRPs-mediated signaling pathways associated with gliomas progression are schematically summarized in Figure 1. Most of the TRP channels involved in gliomagenesis and tumor progression were found to affect more than one cellular process related to carcinogenesis. In this chapter, we will therefore discuss the molecular mechanisms by which each TRP affects cancer cell behavior, subgrouping them into subfamilies.

### Canonical TRPs

It has been suggested that TRPC channels-relayed mechanisms may contribute to some of the most common histopathological hallmarks of GBM such as nuclear atypia and enlarged cell shape (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008). Glioma cell lines and surgical patient-derived tumors have revealed the expression of four TRP channels belonging to the TRP canonical subfamily that are TRPC1, TRPC3, TRPC5, and TRPC6. Further investigations on their role in glioma cells have suggested an involvement of these channels in a Ca²⁺ influx pathway impacting cellular growth. More specifically, it has been shown that TRPC channels contribute to the resting conductance of glioma cells while their acute pharmacological inhibition with SKF96365 increased membrane resistance of glioma cells and caused a transient hyperpolarization followed by a sustain depolarization of the cells' membrane (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008). Additionally, chronic application of the TRPC inhibitor SKF96365 (from 0 to 5 days) would lead to an almost complete growth arrest at the G₂/M phase of GBM D54MG cell cycle, as revealed by FACS analysis (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008). In most cases the blockage of the cell cycle during the G₂/M transition leads to cell death (Stark and Taylor, 2006), or in the particular case of D54MG cells, TRPC inhibition was accompanied by a continued growth exhibiting multinuclear and enlarged cells due to incomplete cytokinesis. This phenotype might render impossible a dynamic adaptation of the cell volume to invade the brain parenchyma, through the narrow extracellular brain spaces compatible with less recurrence.

Glioma cells display a depolarized resting membrane potential around -30 mV. Some TRPC channels are opened at rest and contribute to this membrane potentials (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008). Activation of TRPC channels can also lead to membrane potentials fluctuations by various ways. First of all, TRPC channels are non-selective cation channels and they directly depolarize cells following activation. In addition, TRP

channels are functionally coupled with other ion channels, so their activation can indirectly lead to depolarizations or hyperpolarizations, depending on the channels involved (Gees et al., 2010). In particular, major conductances of glioma cells are mediated by Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels (Ransom et al., 2001) and Cl⁻ channels such as ClC3 or ClC2 (Mcferrin and Sontheimer, 2006), which both are modulated by TRPC channels. Glioma cells do express many types of channels and transporters (Cuddapah and Sontheimer, 2011; Molenaar, 2011), which are sensitive to membrane potential fluctuations. Furthermore, glioma cells have been shown to display electrical activities similar to Na⁺ spikes, which are sustained by TTX-sensitive voltage-gated Na⁺ channels (Bordey and Sontheimer, 1998). Thus, TRPC channels may impact many voltage-dependent cellular processes and modulate electrical behavior of glioma cells.

Among the TRPCs, TRPC1, and TRPC6 are those for which the mechanism of action has been best characterized in human malignant glioma. For instance, TRPC1 was found to act on several hallmarks of cancer, including growth, cell cycle and migration. Interestingly, all the TRPC1 effects on glioma cell behavior strictly resulted from lipid regulation, e.g., in some cases the channel activity is directly affected by lipids [phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate PIP₂, phosphoinositides, diacylglycerol, cholesterol, etc.] localized on the plasma membrane, in other cases, it can be by signaling pathways which lead to the production of specific lipids such as sphingolipids. It has been shown that the loss of TRPC1-mediated Ca²⁺ influx upon pharmacological inhibition or constitutive/inducible shRNA silencing, is associated with reduced cell proliferation and incomplete cell division, thus resulting in multinucleated cells similar to those found in patient biopsies (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2010). The important role of TRPC1 in glioma cell division has been also confirmed *in vivo* through a shRNA knockdown approach on a flank GBM cell tumor model: TRPC1 downregulation led to a significant decrease in tumor size, most likely impairing calcium signaling during cytokinesis (late M-phase) (Bomben and Sontheimer, 2010). TRPC1 has also revealed a role in controlling glioma cell migration. In particular, it has been shown that TRPC1 is essential for chemotactic migration in human malignant gliomas in response to chemoattractant growth factors like epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) which affect TRPC1 activity through different signaling pathways (Bomben et al., 2011; Lepannetier et al., 2016). Stimulation with EGF was associated with a re-localization of TRPC1 channel at the leading edge of migrating D54MG glioma cells within lipid rafts, specialized membrane microdomains enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids (Mollinedo and Gajate, 2015). In agreement, it has been shown that both TRPC1 channel activity and lipid raft integrity were required for gliomas chemotaxis (Bomben et al., 2011). Moreover, the disruption of lipid rafts by depletion of cholesterol not only affected chemotaxis but also impaired TRPC currents in whole-cell recordings and decreased store-operated Ca²⁺ entry (SOCE), confirming a direct interplay between lipid rafts and TRPC1 channels and localized Ca²⁺ rise in regulating the chemotactic movement of
Retourner à l'accueil
*[image]*

Contact

•

Ressources

• Documentation

• FAQ

• API

• OAI-PMH

• AuréHAL

Informations

• À propos

• Données personnelles

• Mentions légales

• Accessibilité

• Conformité RGAA

Questions juridiques

• Je publie, quels sont mes droits ?

• Loi pour une République numérique

• Stratégie de non-cession des droits

• SHERPA/RoMEO

Portails

• Portails institutionnels

• HAL

• HAL SHS

• HAL Thèses

• MédiHAL

CCSD

• CCSD
<table><caption>**TABLE 1** | TRP channels expression and functionality in gliomas/glioblastomas.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Channel</th><th colspan="2">Expression</th><th rowspan="2">Biological effect</th><th rowspan="2">Mechanism</th><th rowspan="2">Potential therapeutic tools</th><th rowspan="2">References</th></tr><tr><th>Healthy</th><th>Tumor progression</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TRPC1</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑</td><td>Cell growth (+)</td><td>↑ Cytokinesis</td><td>TRPC1/SPK/PI3K inhibitors</td><td>Bomben and Sontheimer, 2008; Bomben and Sontheimer, 2010</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">TRPC6</td><td rowspan="3">Low</td><td rowspan="3">↑</td><td>Cell migration (+)</td><td>↑ Chemotaxis</td><td rowspan="3">TRPC6/NFAT inhibitors</td><td>Bomben et al., 2011; Lepannetier et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Cell growth (+)</td><td>→ NFAT</td><td>Chigurupati et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2010</td></tr><tr><td>Cell migration (+)<br>Angiogenesis (+)<br>Radioresistance (+)</td><td>→ RhoA<br>→ NFAT<br>↑ G<sub>2</sub>/M (Cdc25C)</td><td>Chigurupati et al., 2010</td></tr><tr><td>TRPM2</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑</td><td>Cell death (+)</td><td>↑ ROS-induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx</td><td>TRPM2 gene insertion (+ Se and DXT)</td><td>Ding et al., 2010</td></tr><tr><td>TRPM3</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑/↓</td><td>n.d.</td><td>n.d.</td><td>n.d.</td><td>Ishii et al., 2007; Ertilav et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>TRPM7</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑</td><td>Cell growth (+)</td><td>↑ STAT3/Notch</td><td>TRPM7/STAT3/Notch/ALDH1 inhibitors miR-28-5p</td><td>Ying et al., 2013; Alptekin et al., 2015<br>Liu et al., 2014; Wan et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">TRPM8</td><td rowspan="3">Yes</td><td rowspan="3">↑</td><td>Cell invasion (+)<br>Stem cell renewal and differentiation (+)</td><td>-miR-28-5p ↓ Rap1b<br>-miR-28-5p ↓ Rap1b<br>STAT3-ALDH1 ↑</td><td></td><td>Wan et al., 2019<br>Liu et al., 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Cell migration (+)</td><td>↑ BK channels RTK signaling</td><td></td><td>Wondergem et al., 2008; Wondergem and Bartley, 2009; Klumpp et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>Cell growth (+)<br>Cell death (-)<br>Radioresistance (+)</td><td>→ BK channels → CaMKII-cdc25C-cdc2 MAPK signaling<br>MAPK signaling<br>Supporting DNA repair and cell cycle upon genotoxic stress</td><td></td><td>Klumpp et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2019<br>Klumpp et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2019<br>Klumpp et al., 2017</td></tr><tr><td>TRPV1</td><td>Yes</td><td>↓</td><td>Apoptosis (+)</td><td>→ p38 MAPK<br>↑ ER stress (ATF3)</td><td></td><td>Amantini et al., 2007<br>Stock et al., 2012</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">TRPV2</td><td rowspan="3">Yes</td><td rowspan="3">↓</td><td>Cell proliferation (-)<br>Apoptosis (+)<br>Cell differentiation (+)</td><td>ERK signaling<br>Fas signaling<br>↑ GFAP and β<sub>III</sub>-tubulin expression ↑ Aml-1 a (PI3K/AKT pathway)</td><td>CBD</td><td>Nabissi et al., 2010; Morelli et al., 2012<br>Nabissi et al., 2010<br>Morelli et al., 2012; Nabissi et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Drug sensitivity (+)</td><td>↑ drug uptake ↑ drug-mediated apoptotic pathway</td><td>CBD + TMZ/BCNU/DOXO</td><td>Nabissi et al., 2013, 2015</td></tr></tbody></table>

(Continued)
• Episciences

• Sciencesconf
<table><caption>TABLE 1 | Continued</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Channel</th><th rowspan="2">Healthy</th><th colspan="2">Expression</th><th rowspan="2">Mechanism</th><th rowspan="2">Potential therapeutic tools</th><th rowspan="2">References</th></tr><tr><th>Tumor progression</th><th>Biological effect</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TRPV4</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑</td><td>Cell migration (+)</td><td>AKT/Rac1 signaling</td><td>TRPV4 inhibitors (HC-067047)</td><td>Ou-yang et al., 2018</td></tr><tr><td>TRPA1</td><td>n.d.</td><td>n.d.</td><td>Cell apoptosis (+)</td><td>↑ mitochondrial stress</td><td>TRPA1 activators</td><td>Deveci et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>TRPML1</td><td>Yes</td><td>↓</td><td>Cell apoptosis (+)<br>Autophagy (+)</td><td></td><td></td><td>Morelli et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>TRPML2</td><td>Yes</td><td>↑</td><td>Cell proliferation (+)<br>Cell apoptosis (+)</td><td>PI3K/AKT - ERK 1/2 signaling</td><td></td><td>Morelli et al., 2016</td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviations: +, increase; -, decrease; ↑, increase; ↓, reduction; →, activation; ↓, inhibition. SPK, sphingosine kinase; PI3K, phosphoinositide-3 kinase; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T-cells; Se, selenium; DXT, docetaxel; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; miR-28-5p, miRNA 28-5p; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; BK, large-conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ membrane ion channels; RTK, Met receptor tyrosine kinase; CaMKII, Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; Cdc25C, M-phase inducer phosphatase 3; Cdc2, subunit of the M phase-promoting factor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ATF3, transcription factor-3; CBD, cannabidiol; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; Aml-1 a, acute myeloid leukemia variant a; AKT, protein kinase B; TMZ, temozolomide; BCNU, carmustine; DOXO, doxorubicin. n.d., not determined.

glioma cells (Bomben et al., 2011). It must be noted that TRPC pharmacological inhibition through non-selective inhibitors caused an almost complete loss of chemotactic migration but TRPC1 knockdown through shRNA compromised directional migration but did not eliminate it and did not affect non-directional motility. This suggests TRPC1 specific implication in chemotactic migration and the potential implication of other TRPC channels in migration processes (Bomben et al., 2011). As shown by a more recent study by Lepannetier et al. (2016), lipids are not only important for the regulation of TRPC1 at the membrane level, but also through their signaling. The authors shed light on another store-independent mechanism by which TRPC1 may be activated and thus affect cell migration in GBM. In particular, they have shown that PDGF may induce the translocation of TRPC1 from the cytosolic compartment to the front of migrating cells through a mechanism requiring the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) and at the same time induces the production of the lipid second messenger sphingosine-1-P (S1P) which in turn, activates TRPC1-mediated Ca²⁺ entry. Indeed, the PDGF-induced Ca²⁺ influx through TRPC1 can be partially inhibited by pretreatment of the cells with a specific inhibitor of the sphingosine kinase (SPK) producing S1P (Lepannetier et al., 2016). However, whether S1P directly or indirectly triggers TRPC1-mediated and store-independent entry of Ca²⁺ channel remains to be clarified (Lepannetier et al., 2016). In any case, it has been well established that both TRPC1 targeting to the leading edge of lamellipodia and its activation by S1P are essential in regulating PDGF-induced chemotaxis in U251 glioblastoma cells (Lepannetier et al., 2016).

Another member of the TRPC subfamily specifically implicated in glioma progression is TRPC6. Indeed, TRPC6 was found to affect different hallmarks of GBM including tumor growth, cell survival, invasiveness and angiogenesis (Chigurupati et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2010). More specifically, it has been demonstrated that under hypoxia, which is one of the main characteristics of GBM aggressiveness, invasion and resistance to treatment (Flynn et al., 2008), Notch1 activation consequently led to TRPC6 upregulation in primary GBM samples and cell lines (Chigurupati et al., 2010). Indeed, the inhibition/silencing of TRPC6 was associated with a reduction in glioma growth, invasion and angiogenesis. This Notch1-mediated induction of TRPC6 expression in hypoxic U373 cell line was subtype-specific, since other members of the TRPC subfamily were unaffected, indicating that TRPC6 is primarily responsible for the hypoxia-induced sustained increase in the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration. Additionally, it has been proven that TRPC6 is essential for GBM cell survival, since its downregulation not only suppressed cell growth *in vitro* and reduced tumor volume *in vivo*, but also impaired clonogenic ability, induced cell cycle arrest at the G₂/M phase, and enhanced the antiproliferative effect of ionizing radiation.

An accelerated G₂ phase progression may lead to an impaired DNA damage checkpoint and thus to an enhanced genomic instability, explaining the TRPC6 association with enhanced glioma cell malignancy. Mechanistically, TRPC6 effects on cell proliferation, tumor growth and angiogenesis seemed to be directly mediated by the Ca²⁺-induced activation of the
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** | TRPs-mediated signaling pathways in gliomas. (A) Anti-tumorigenic TRPs-mediated signaling pathways in gliomas. Cartoon depicting TRP channels signaling pathways suppressing gliomas progression through the inhibition of pro-tumorigenic pathways (in red) and/or the activation of anti-tumorigenic signaling pathways (in green). TRPM2 and TRPML1 upon ROS activation promote cell apoptosis through an increase in oxidative stress and intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration; due to its localization on the lysosomal membrane TRPML1 may also mediates the autophagic cell death pathway through the interaction with HSP; TRPA1 under hypoxia promotes apoptosis inducing ROS formation and inhibiting antioxidants such as GSH; TRPV1 upon stimulation with CPS triggers the apoptotic pathway through p38 MAPK and reduces glioma expansion via ER pathway in a ATF3-dependent manner; TRPV2 reduces cell proliferation and enhances the Fas-induced</figcaption></figure>

(Continued)
<caption>**FIGURE 1** | Continued</caption>

apoptosis in an ERK-dependent manner; TRPV2 also acts on cell differentiation since its overexpression is associated with GFAP and βIII-tubulin increased expression and its activation by CBD promotes Aml-1 up-regulation via PI3K/AKT pathway; finally, TRPV2 activation by CBD can improve cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents favoring drug uptake. (B) Pro-tumorigenic TRPs-mediated signaling pathways in gliomas. Cartoon depicting TRP channels signaling pathways promoting gliomas progression through the activation of pro-tumorigenic pathways (in red) and/or the inhibition of anti-tumorigenic signaling pathways (in green). TRPC1 affects cell growth and cell proliferation mainly promoting cytokinesis in response to lipid activation, whereas upon stimulation with growth factors it induces chemotactic migration; TRPC6 affects cell proliferation, tumor growth and angiogenesis likely through the Ca²⁺-induced activation of the calcineurin-NFAT pathway, whereas TRPC6 effects on cell migration might rather involve Rho activation and subsequent actin cytoskeleton rearrangements; TRPV4 promotes cell migration and tumor invasiveness through the AKT-mediated Rac1 activation; TRPM8 supports glioma progression by inhibiting apoptosis through MAPK pathway and impairing the cell cycle through the activation of BK channels and the subsequent CaMKII-mediated inhibition of phosphatases like Cdc25C and Cdc2; TRPM8 effects on cell migration/invasion are also associated with BK channels activation and the function of TRPM8 in aggressiveness and resistance to treatment may also be potentiated by TKR-mediated HGF/SF stimulation; TRPM7 increases glioma cell proliferation and invasion through the down-regulation of miR-28-5p and the subsequent up-regulation of oncogenic signaling pathways involving AKT, ERK, IGF-1 and Rap1b; TRPM7 effects on glioma proliferation may also be mediated by Notch and/or JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways and through the activation of STAT3; TRPM7 might also be involved in GSC renewal and differentiation thanks to the up-regulation of the well-known GSC marker ALDH1; the hypermethylation of TRPM3 promoter through the down-regulation of miR-204 enhances cell migration; TRPML2 enhances cell proliferation and slows down apoptosis improving DNA repair and inhibiting Caspase 3 likely through PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 pathways. Abbreviations: ROS, reactive oxygen species; HSP, heat shock proteins; GSH, glutathione; CPS, capsaicin; ATF3, transcription factor-3; CBD, cannabidiol; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; Aml-1, acute myeloid leukemia transcription factors; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinases; AKT, protein-kinase B; HGF/SF, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; TKR, tyrosine kinase receptor; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T-cells; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; BK, big potassium channels; CaMKII, Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; Cdc25C and Cdc2, cell division cycle proteins; JAK2, janus kinase 2; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; GSC, glioma stem cells; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1.

calcineurin-NFAT pathway (Chigurupati et al., 2010), whereas TRPC6 effects on cell migration might rather involve Rho activation and subsequent actin cytoskeleton rearrangements (Singh et al., 2007). Together, these data stress a possible role of TRPC6 as a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of human GBM (Chigurupati et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2010).

## Melastatin TRPs

Four TRP melastatin subfamily members, TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM7, and TRPM8, have been implicated in glioma cell growth, proliferation and migration. Among them, TRPM2 and TRPM3 would exert anti-tumorigenic effects, while TRPM7 and TRPM8 may contribute to glioma malignancy.

TRPM2 is known for its role as a sensor of oxidative stress and inductor of necrotic cell death upon activation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Naziroğlu and Lückhoff, 2008; Takahashi et al., 2011). TRPM2 expression likely induced no effect on cell proliferation, migration and invasion. But in A172 human GBM cells the transfection with TRPM2 channels increased cell death induced by H₂O₂ in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (Ishii et al., 2007) and in human GBM (DBTRG) cells, TRPM2 activation led to an increase in oxidative stress and intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration, thus promoting GBM cell death through apoptosis (Ertilav et al., 2019). Concerning TRPM3, which is the most recently described melastatin subfamily member, Its roles and action mechanisms were only recently investigated (Zamudio-Bulcock et al., 2011). Like TRPM2, TRPM3 may show a protective role in glioma probably via the miR-204 regulation (Ying et al., 2013), but its function needs further studies.

TRPM7 also controls glioma progression through miRNA regulation in GBM cells with subsequent effects on cell proliferation and invasion (Wan et al., 2019). More specifically, TRPM7 expression can be associated with a decreased production of miR-28-5p, a tumor suppressor inhibiting the expression of oncogenic signaling pathways involving protein-kinase B (AKT) (Xiao et al., 2018), ERK (Liu et al., 2016), and

IGF-1 (Shi and Teng, 2015). Accordingly, the downregulation of miR-28-5p caused a significant increase in glioma cell proliferation and invasion. Among miR-28-5p targets, expression of Rap1b appeared as being positively correlated with TRPM7 in GBM and was up-regulated in tumor samples due to the suppression of the repressing role of miR-28-5p (Wan et al., 2019). This miR-28-5p/Rap1b axis shown in gliomagenesis is not the exclusive signaling route in which TRPM7 acts on GBM progression. Indeed, TRPM7 may also regulate the Notch pathway (Liu et al., 2014), recently shown as linked with Rap1b signaling and integrin-mediated cell adhesion in hematopoietic stem cells (Rho et al., 2019). This can be connected with the role of TRPM7 on cell proliferation, migration and invasion in glioma cells and GSCs through the upregulation of JAK2/STAT3 and/or Notch signaling pathways (Liu et al., 2014). Moreover, TRPM7 was found to activate STAT3, which in turn binds to the aldehyde dehydrogenase1 (ALDH1) promoter upregulating the expression of this well-known GSC marker involved in many pathways maintaining stem cell-like state (Rasper et al., 2010), when expanded as spheroids (Liu et al., 2014). Since ALDH1 is functionally involved in self-protection, differentiation, expansion and proliferation (Choudhary et al., 2005; Ma and Allan, 2011), this potentially means that TRPM7 is not only implicated in proliferation, migration and invasion, but also in GSC renewal and differentiation. This has to be put into the context that TRPM7 channel exhibits an intrinsic kinase activity, thus supporting that TRPM7 effects on glioma cell growth are mediated by its channel activity while cell migration and invasion required its kinase domain (Wan et al., 2019). The discovery of different cellular and molecular targets affecting gliomas development and progression through their modulation by TRPM7 provides key insights for the development of novel therapeutic agents for glioma treatments.

TRPM8 was found to affect the rate of GBM cell migration by mediating a significant increase in intracellular Ca²⁺
concentration upon stimulation with specific agonists such as menthol and icilin (Wondergem et al., 2008; Wondergem and Bartley, 2009; Klumpp et al., 2017). It has been shown that TRPM8 activation by icilin leads to a significant increase in the migration speed and chemotaxis of GBM cells and, consistently, TRPM8 downregulation by RNA interference as well as TRPM8 inhibition by the specific channel blocker BCTC [N-(4-tertiarybutylphenyl)-4-(3-cholorphyridin-2-yl)tetrahydropyrazine-1(2H)-carbox-amide] reduces cell migration rate and decreases transfilter chemotaxis (Klumpp et al., 2017). One of the possible mechanisms through which TRPM8-mediated Ca²⁺ influx may affect cell migration in glioma is by the activation of the large-conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ ion channels (BK channels) (Wondergem and Bartley, 2009). BK channels contribute to maintaining the plasma membrane ionic fluxes essential to support cell shrinkage-driven cell migration (Mcferrin and Sontheimer, 2006). Interestingly, BK overexpression was detected in human glioma cells (Ransom and Sontheimer, 2001) and pharmacological inhibition of BK channels was shown to abolish the menthol-stimulated Ca²⁺ influx within the cell cytoplasm and cell migration suggesting a key role of TRPM8. TRPM8 activation by agonists has been shown to increase the open probability of single BK channels (Wondergem and Bartley, 2009; Klumpp et al., 2017). In agreement, ionizing radiation, known to induce the migration through a Ca²⁺-mediated activation of BK channels (Steinle et al., 2011; Edalat et al., 2016), has been shown to activate and upregulate TRPM8-mediated Ca²⁺ influx in glioma cells (Klumpp et al., 2017), thus confirming a direct and reciprocal interplay between these two channel families in the control of GBM migration. The function of TRPM8 in aggressiveness and resistance to treatment was suggested by the potentiating impact of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), a multifunctional effector of cells expressing the Met tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR), on TRPM8-induced Ca²⁺ homeostasis and cell migration. This evidence suggests that TRPM8 might converge to a common HGF/SF and cMET, known to play a role in malignancy of solid tumors including glioma (Laterra et al., 1997; Birchmeier et al., 2003; Wondergem et al., 2008), signaling pathway leading to migration/invasion. An enhancement in the invasion rate of human GBM cells has also been associated with TRPM8 overexpression (Zeng et al., 2019). However, DBTRG cells would express two different variants of TRPM8 (Wondergem et al., 2008) as revealed in Western blot showing a molecular band at 130–140 kDa in the plasma membrane-enriched fraction and consistent with the molecular weight of TRPM8 full-length isoform (Peier et al., 2002), and a second molecular band at 95–100 kDa in microsome- and membrane-enriched fractions more consistent with a truncated TRPM8 splice variant expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Bidaux et al., 2007). The observed greater increase in menthol-induced Ca²⁺ influx among migrating cells compared with non-migrating cells (Wondergem et al., 2008), likely indicates that only migrating cells express full-length TRPM8 protein within the plasma membrane. However, these results have to be taken with caution in a future context of drug therapy,

since TRPM8 was shown to have an anti-migratory activity in other cancers including prostate cancer and may play a role in the tumoral and tumor-derived endothelial cells (Gkika et al., 2010, 2015; Genova et al., 2017; Grolez et al., 2019b). TRPM8 contribution to GBM progression was found to go far beyond its effects on cell migration and invasion, significantly affecting other determinant processes such as cell cycle, cell survival and radioresistance (Klumpp et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2019). Indeed, it has been proven that TRPM8 inhibition or knockdown impaired the cell cycle, triggered apoptotic cell death and attenuated DNA repair and clonogenic survival (Klumpp et al., 2017). A recent study by Zeng et al. (2019) have suggested an involvement of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in TRPM8-mediated effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis, since the expression of the channel was associated with the expression levels of important regulators of these pathways, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), cyclin D1 and the apoptosis-related protein Bcl-2 in human glioma cells. Moreover, it has been shown that TRPM8 signaling directly regulates the cell cycle, contributing to S phase progression and mitosis. These effects on glioma's cell cycle are most likely mediated by intracellular signaling pathways involving the Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and some Cdc phosphatases like Cdc25C and Cdc2, which control entry into, and progression through, various phases of the cell cycle (Klumpp et al., 2017). More specifically, the TRPM8-mediated Ca²⁺ entry, through the activation of BK channels, may increase the CaMKII activity, which in turn inhibits the Cdc2 subunit of the mitosis-promoting factor likely through the inhibitory phosphorylation of the Cdc25C phosphatase (Klumpp et al., 2017). Finally, TRPM8 channel might also modulate proliferation by dynamically control glioma resting potentials levels, which are key regulator of cell cycle. TRPM8 agonists have been shown to increase the Kir4.1 mediated membrane conductances of glioma cells (Ratto et al., 2020). Kir4.1 is an inward rectifier K⁺ channel, with an altered pattern of expression in glioma. In astrocytes, it is responsible for high potassium conductance and hyperpolarized membrane potential (Olsen and Sontheimer, 2008). Overexpression of this channel in glioma cell lines D54MG reduces cell proliferation (Higashimori and Sontheimer, 2007). Thus, TRPM8 channel by regulating K⁺ resting conductances of glioma cells may exert a regulation of cell cycle transitions. Moreover, TRPM8 has also been found to be a contributor to the genotoxic stress response of GBM upon treatment with ionizing radiation, restoring G₁/S transition and S phase progression to levels of unirradiated cells (Klumpp et al., 2017). Interestingly, it has been found that ionizing radiation stimulated TRPM8 availability both *in vitro* and *in vivo* and that TRPM8 played a role in the re-entry in mitosis and cell division upon radiation-induced G₂/M arrest, since its knockdown resulted in an impaired DNA repair and a decreased survival of irradiated cells (Klumpp et al., 2017). This, combined with the slowdown of apoptosis in irradiated GBM cells, may explain the enhanced radioresistance acquired by GBM cells overexpressing TRPM8, thus stressing that the key interest of targeting TRPM8 alone
or in combination with radiotherapy for future treatments of GBM.

## Vanilloid TRPs

Some TRP members of the vanilloid family have been related to gliomagenesis and progression. More specifically, TRPV1 and TRPV2 have revealed a protective role in glioma cells by regulating cell proliferation and survival, stem cell differentiation and sensitivity to drugs, whereas TRPV4 was found to increase cancer cell invasiveness.

The anti-tumorigenic functional role of TRPV1 in gliomas, suggested by its marked downregulation or loss in patients with the shortest overall survival, has been investigated and several findings highlighted a role of TRPV1 in the induction of apoptotic cell death signaling in gliomas (Amantini et al., 2007; Stock et al., 2012). Upon exposure to low doses of the TRPV1 specific agonist capsaicin (CPS), the TRPV1-Ca²⁺ may sustain apoptosis in gliomas through the selective activation of p38 MAPK, but not ERK MAPK (Amantini et al., 2007). More in detail, it has been shown that CPS-mediated TRPV1 activation leads to reduced cell viability, DNA fragmentation, externalization of phosphatidylserine on the outer layer of the plasma membrane, mitochondrial transmembrane potential dissipation, and caspase 3 activation (Amantini et al., 2007). Moreover, TRPV1 translation in GBM was found to be sensitive to interferon-gamma (INF-γ) and to the well-known autophagic inducer rapamycin (Rap), suggesting a link between TRPV1 channel and autophagy often related to pro-survival in tumors including GBM (Galluzzi et al., 2015) but also in migration (Coly et al., 2017). This biological effect might be achieved by the TRPV1-mediated induction of apoptosis previously reported in GBM cells (Amantini et al., 2007).

One of the mechanisms through which the brain, especially in the juvenile phase, can protect itself against high-grade astrocytoma (HGAs) involves the activation of TRPV1 by neural precursor cells (NPCs), known to show extensive tropism for brain tumors (Mayor et al., 2001). Interestingly, NPCs accumulate at HGA especially in the context of the juvenile brain, exhibiting a high proliferative activity in the stem cell niche (Walzlein et al., 2008), and can release tumor-suppressive factors, such as endovanilloids able to activate TRPV1 expressed by HGA cells (Stock et al., 2012). The activation of the latter would trigger astrocytoma cell death through the ER pathway in a transcription factor-3 (ATF3)-dependent manner, thus reducing glioma expansion mostly in young brain (Stock et al., 2012). In light of these data, the inverse correlation between TRPV1 expression and glioma grade from I to III and the reduced or lost TRPV1 expression found in GBM patients is most likely a mechanism by which tumor cells may evade anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic signals. This hypothesis is also supported by the finding that TRPV1 is also downregulated in GSCs (Stock et al., 2012), whose resistance to cytotoxic therapies and to pro-apoptotic signals is accepted (Bao et al., 2006a). Furthermore, the induction of GSCs differentiation was accompanied by TRPV1<sub>v3</sub> expression at a similar level than found in low-grade glioma, thus confirming a protective role of this channel against aggressiveness (Nabissi et al., 2016).

TRPV2 exerts its anti-tumorigenic function on gliomas through the regulation of several signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival, stem cell differentiation and sensitivity to drugs. Physiologically, the triggering of TRPV2 by agonists/activators such as growth factors, hormones and cannabinoids led to TRPV2 translocation from the endosome to the plasma membrane, where it mediates several pathways associated with cell proliferation and cell death (Liberati et al., 2014). Thus, loss or alterations of TRPV2 expression in cancer cells results in an impairment of these processes, as shown in prostate tumor-derived endothelial cells (Bernardini et al., 2019) and gliomas (Liberati et al., 2014). In gliomas, it has been shown that TRPV2 reduced cell proliferation and increased cell sensitivity to Fas-induced apoptosis in an ERK-dependent manner (Nabissi et al., 2010). Consistently, enhanced cell growth and rescuing from apoptotic cell death was observed when TRPV2 was silencing in U87MG GBM cells. In contrast, TRPV2 upregulation in MZC primary glioma cells, by inducing Fas overexpression led to reduced viability and increased spontaneous as well as Fas-induced apoptosis (Nabissi et al., 2010). Similar findings were also described in GSCs, whose proliferation appeared strongly impaired by TRPV2 pharmacological inhibition or knocking down (Morelli et al., 2012). In GSCs, TRPV2 acts also on differentiation (Morelli et al., 2012; Nabissi et al., 2015). More specifically, TRPV2 overexpression was associated with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and βIII-tubulin increased expression, thus promoting a glial phenotype differentiation while inhibiting GSCs proliferation both *in vitro* and *in vivo*. In agreement, TRPV2 silencing or inhibition during differentiation impaired differentiation and reduced GFAP and βIII-tubulin expression (Morelli et al., 2012). Moreover, TRPV2 activation through cannabidiol (CBD) was found to trigger GSCs differentiation activating the autophagic process, in addition to inhibiting GSCs proliferation and clonogenic capability (Nabissi et al., 2015). More specifically, it has been observed that CBD, through the TRPV2-mediated activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, upregulated the expression of acute myeloid leukemia (Aml-1) transcription factors, known for their pivotal role in GBM proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, it has also been shown that the spliced variant Aml-1 a, upregulated during GSCs differentiation, directly influenced the expression of TRPV2 by binding its gene promoter (Nabissi et al., 2015), thus establishing a positive feedback circuit, which on the whole caused glial differentiation.

Conversely to TRPV1 and TRPV2, TRPV4 has revealed a pivotal role in promoting glioma progression (Ou-yang et al., 2018). In particular, the tumorigenic potential of TRPV4 comes from its critical involvement in glioma cell migration and invasion. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that TRPV4-mediated Ca²⁺ influx upon stimulation with the selective agonist GSK1016790 A, is able to promote cell migration of glioma cells (Ou-yang et al., 2018), a similar mechanism previously reported in breast cancer (Lee et al., 2017). It was established that TRPV4 effects on cell migration are relayed by phosphorylation of AKT (P-AKT) and activation of Rac1 (Ou-yang et al., 2018), a
member of the Rho GTPases family known for its central role in cytoskeleton remodeling, cell motility and cell adhesion as well as for its involvement in the enhanced migration of several tumor types including GBM, colon, colorectal and ovarian cancer (Guo et al., 2015; Guéginou et al., 2016; Qin et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2018). Accordingly, TRPV4 blockade, induced by the specific TRPV4 inhibitor HC-067047, was found to decrease motility and invasiveness of U87 glioma cells through a P-AKT and Rac1 signaling pathway (Ou-yang et al., 2018).

## Mucolipin TRPs

The two TRP members of mucolipin subfamily have revealed opposite effects on glioma carcinogenesis.

TRPML1 showed a protective role against glioma progression. Indeed, it has been shown that TRPML1 activation by its specific agonist MK6-83 reduced T98 and U251 cell line viability and increased caspase 3-dependent apoptosis. Accordingly, TRPML1 silencing or pharmacological inhibition restored cell viability suppressing the $Ca^{2+}$ influx responsible for apoptosis induction. Furthermore, TRPML1 may also mediate the autophagic cell death pathway, upon cell treatment with the ROS inducer carbonyl cyanide *m*-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (Morelli et al., 2019). Indeed, high ROS levels may trigger a TRPML1-mediated lysosomal $Ca^{2+}$ release and the subsequent enhancement of autophagy (Zhang et al., 2016b). Accordingly, TRPML1 silencing or inhibition by sphingomyelin pre-treatment reverted CCCP effects (Morelli et al., 2019). In this context, it has also been demonstrated that TRPML1, through a large intraluminal loop between its first and second transmembrane domains, may interact with chaperone-mediated autophagy-related proteins such as the heat shock proteins Hsc70, and Hsp40 (Venugopal et al., 2009). Therefore, TRPML1 may exert its cytotoxic effects through two different pathways, e.g., (i) it can act as a ROS sensor on the lysosomal membrane and attenuate oxidative cell stress through an autophagy-dependent negative-feedback mechanism (Zhang et al., 2016a; Morelli et al., 2019) or (ii) it may trigger $Ca^{2+}$ release but no ROS production upon direct activation by its specific agonist, thus inducing apoptosis (Morelli et al., 2019). Moreover, the important role of TRPML1 in controlling intracellular $Ca^{2+}$ homeostasis has been further corroborated by the recent finding of a functional localization of TRPML1 at the so-called “mitochondria-lysosome contact sites” where it mediates a calcium flux from lysosomes to mitochondria adjuvanted by VDAC and MCU on the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes, respectively (Peng et al., 2020). Consequently, TRPML1 functions go beyond the regulation of lysosomal dynamics and function and, through the control of mitochondrial $Ca^{2+}$ dynamics, can affect other $Ca^{2+}$-dependent mitochondrial functions, including oxidative phosphorylation, motility, and ROS signaling (Peng et al., 2020).

Conversely to TRPML1, the other member of the mucolipin family, TRPML2, has revealed a pro-tumorigenic function in glioma progression. Indeed, it has been shown that TRPML2 enhanced glioma cell survival and proliferation (Morelli et al., 2016). More in detail, TRPML2 suppression leads to impaired cell cycle, reduced cell viability and decreased proliferation (Morelli et al., 2016). In addition, its knocking-down was found

to induce apoptosis by increasing DNA damage, Ser139 H2AX phosphorylation and caspase-3 activation (Morelli et al., 2016). TRPML2 effects on tumor progression are probably mediated by PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 pathways, since these pathways remained inactivated in TRPML2-silenced cells (Morelli et al., 2016). Thus, TRPML2 might also be an interesting therapeutic target to control GBM cell survival and proliferation.

## THERAPEUTIC TARGETING

Considering the altered expression and the great contribution given by TRP channels to the establishment and progression of glioma, they may be considered very promising new therapeutic molecular targets against which novel drug compounds must be developed. One of the main advantages provided by most TRPs is their accessibility from the extracellular side, which makes them efficient targetable sites via administration of specific TRPs inhibitors or blockers when these channels are overexpressed in high-grade glioma. For instance, some of the TRPC channels by interfering with cytokinesis pathways would be promising targets for the development of drugs able to interfere with the almost unrestrained growth of gliomas, making tumors more susceptible to surgical removal or focal radiotherapy. Moreover, the low specificity of some TRPC modulators might allow to achieve a higher antitumor effect, through the simultaneous triggering of more than one channel. The progressive understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying TRPC function in glioma has also provided opportunities and arguments in favor of small molecule targeted therapies. Through studies concerning TRPC1 and its specific pharmacological inhibition, the key option by inhibiting SPK or PI3K inhibitors is once again here confirmed to attempt controlling GBM growth and invasiveness. Among TRPC channels, great potential as a promising new candidate for GBM treatment comes from TRPC6. Among TRP, TRPC6 is to date the only one being implicated in GBM angiogenesis suggesting that specific TRPC6 inhibitors could simultaneously target both cancer progression and vascularization, thereby improving the efficacy of standard (radio-chemotherapy) options. The barely detectable TRPC6 expression in normal glial cells should limit the potential side effects on normal glial cells. But a possible impact of TRPC6 blockade on neurons must be considered in regards to the central role of TRPC6 in neuronal functions (Tai et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2017). A possible strategy to overcome this problem might be the use of viral vectors as a drug delivery system toward glioma cells since adenovirus may target glioma cells more efficiently than neurons (Ding et al., 2010).

As recurrence is due to migration and invasion (and resistance to treatment), pharmacological inhibition of TRPV4 might represent a potential new therapeutic approach in GBM treatment to control migratory and invasive capabilities of GBM cells (Ou-yang et al., 2018). One of the mechanisms through which tumor cells are able to sustain a prolonged survival is by the inhibition of apoptotic pathways (Thompson, 1995). In this context, TRPA1 has been recently proposed as a new potential therapeutic target in GBM treatment. Indeed, TRPA1 is
a ROS-sensitive cation channel and can subsequently be activated by hypoxia-induced oxidative stress (Naziroğlu, 2012; Takahashi et al., 2018). It has been shown that TRPA1 activation following cobalt chloride (CoCl₂) treatment with the aim to mimic hypoxia, may increase apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative effects on DBTRG cells (Deveci et al., 2019). More specifically, TRPA1-mediated Ca²⁺ entry was associated with an enhancement of ROS production and mitochondrial membrane depolarization (JC-1). Moreover, TRPA1 activation leads to increased levels of Annexin V, cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, and caspase 3 and 9 and decreased levels of thiol cycle antioxidants (GSH and GSH-Px) (Deveci et al., 2019). These effects were shown attenuated by α-lipoic acid (ALA) treatment, a physiological source of energy for cells which may exert both anti- and pro-oxidant functions (Moini et al., 2002). In glioma cells under hypoxia, ALA likely acts as an antioxidant agent, upregulating GSH and GSH-Px and down-regulating mitochondrial ROS production, thus blocking TRPA1-mediated induction of apoptotic cell death (Deveci et al., 2019). This suggests that targeting and activating TRPA1 or targeting TRPV1 in glioma exhibiting such expression, can restore apoptotic signaling and might provide new insights for the development of alternative therapies against glioma progression.

Besides being potential anti-tumor targets, TRP channels should play a role as “drug carriers” in cancer therapy, facilitating *via* the central pore chemotherapy drug uptake thus improving the efficacy of cancer therapies. For instance, TRPV2 activation by CBD can sensitize GBM cells to chemotherapeutic agents currently used, e.g., TMZ, carmustine (BCNU) and doxorubicin (DOXO) (Nabissi et al., 2013, 2015). The CBD-induced TRPV2 activation was found to increase GSCs sensitivity to cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents like BCNU favoring drug uptake (Nabissi et al., 2013), in synergy with the Ca²⁺-dependent triggering of apoptotic cell death, a mechanism not found in normal astrocytes (Nabissi et al., 2015). Specifically, by using the natural red fluorescent DOXO, it has been demonstrated that TRPV2 overexpression in MZC glioma cells markedly increased DOXO uptake in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner, since Ca²⁺ chelation by EGTA completely inhibited the CBD-induced TRPV2-mediated increase of DOXO-positive cells (Nabissi et al., 2013). Similar findings were also observed in hepatocellular carcinoma in which TRPV2 activation by CBD or 2-APB (Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate) was found to improve DOXO permeation into tumor cells, thus corroborating an intriguing role of TRPV2 in increasing tumor cell sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs (Neumann-Raizel et al., 2019). Taking into account other evidence on the role of TRP channels as “drug carriers” thanks to the permeation of chemotherapy agents into the cell through their pore domain (Santoni and Farfariello, 2011), it is reasonable to speculate that the activation of TRPV2 channel may cause a conformational change in the pore helix structure, which allow for intracellular non-specific chemotherapy uptake (Nabissi et al., 2013), opening the route for combinatorial co-administration of TRPV2 specific agonist CBD and lower chemotherapeutic doses to overcome the high resistance of GBM and GSCs to chemotherapeutic agents. In this context, recent developments on the role of the so-called

“pore turret,” i.e., the region of the extracellular ring that connects the S5 helix to the pore helix, in controlling the upper gate of some TRP channels including TRPV2 (Dosey et al., 2019) have provided new insights into the role of TRPV2 as a drug target to reduce GBM chemoresistance. Indeed, the well-defined pore turret, in addition to allowing the coupling between the lower gate and the upper gate in response to intracellular stimuli stabilizing a fully open unliganded channel, represents a possible and interesting binding site for extracellular modulators through which it may affect channel activity allowing the passage through the plasma membrane of partially hydrophilic molecules which otherwise could not enter the cell (Dosey et al., 2019).

With a view to looking ahead, some data indicate that TRP channels may constitute targets of gene therapy. It has been recently shown that TRPM2 can promote cell death (Ertilav et al., 2019). Therefore, TRPM2 might represent a good candidate for gene therapy to be used for instance in combination with γ-radiation and/or chemotherapeutic agents to improve the effectiveness of GBM treatments. Preliminary observations indicate that Selenium (Se) tested on GBM cells resistant to Docetaxel (DTX) may improve the apoptotic efficacy of DTX through the activation of TRPM2 by oxidative stress (Ertilav et al., 2019). The cytotoxic effect of DTX likely comes from the formation of excessive mitochondrial ROS and Ca²⁺ influx into the cells which causes DNA damage by triggering hyperactivation of the DNA nick sensor PARP, thus leading to NAD+ and ATP depletion and subsequent apoptotic cell death (Ertilav et al., 2019). In this case, Se, in particular, stimulated oxidative stress production in the mitochondria, which in turn activated a TRPM2-mediated Ca²⁺ influx, thus supporting and enhancing the same Ca²⁺-dependent apoptotic pathway induced by DTX and other chemotherapeutic agents, as seen also in other tumor types (Hazane-Puch et al., 2016; Çetin et al., 2017). Overall the combination and synergistic activity of Se and DTX in GBM expressing TRPM2 might offer a new option for adjuvant chemotherapy as treatment of GBM.

## FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Increasing understanding of the signaling pathways involved in tumorigenesis has made it possible to identify a wide range of molecular targets involved in self-renewal and proliferation, angiogenesis but also in invasion of GBM cells. A number of therapeutic strategies have therefore been developed during the last decade and few of them have proven to be effective, even though anti-angiogenic treatments appear to be able to provide a 6 months delay for GBM patients before recurrence. It is, therefore, necessary to identify other therapeutic targets that can be combined with anti-angiogenic, cytotoxic, DNA repair inhibitors and/or immunotherapy strategies. In this context, targeting the activity of factors or components expressed by glioma cells themselves and by other cell types of the micro-environment would also be promising. It has also to be considered that main RNAseq and/or transcriptomic databases were constituted by means of the glioma tumor
bulk composed of the different populations of GBM cells and other constituents such as endothelial cells, pericytes, reactive astrocytes, macrophages (M1 and/or M2), microglial, neurons, and potentially lymphocytes, depending on the level of heterogeneity GBM subgroup. New potential family targets, expressed at the plasma membrane and involved in survival, GSC differentiation, angiogenesis and invasion, constitute a choice option. TRP channels not systematically ubiquitously expressed, potentially playing pleiotropic mechanisms and being overexpressed in pathologic situations such as hypoxia in glioma cells deserve to be more explored, especially since they could be also expressed by other cell types belonging to the tumor micro-environment.

For instance, a direct involvement of TRP channels in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways affecting brain neovascularization and tumor growth it has been proven. GCSs positive for CD133 (human prominin-1/AC 133) not only are capable of self-renewal and proliferation, but also possess the capability to secrete high levels of VEGF (Bao et al., 2006b; Yao et al., 2008), known to play a crucial role in endothelial cell recruitment and angiogenesis of malignant human gliomas (Fischer et al., 2005; Bian et al., 2006). In GSCs isolated from U87 cell line the production of VEGF and the angiogenic CXCL8 (chemokine interleukin-8) by tumor cells appeared to be mediated by a G protein-coupled receptor named formylpeptide receptor (FPR) which, upon activation, induces directional migration, growth and angiogenic factors production through a Ca²⁺ mobilization. Although a direct involvement of TRPs in this Ca²⁺-mediated mechanism has not been highlighted, a GCPR-TRP axis in many signaling pathways is nowadays well established (Veldhuis et al., 2015). Moreover, an interesting crosstalk between TRPM8, TRPV1 and the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) it has been recently characterized in uveal melanoma, suggesting a good potential for TRPM8 as a pharmacological target for blocking brain neovascularization and tumor growth (Walcher et al., 2018). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that in different cell types including corneal epithelial and endothelial cells (Lucius et al., 2016) and uveal melanoma cells (Walcher et al., 2018) the activation of TRPM8 inhibits the VEGF transactivation of TRPV1 and the consequent pro-tumorigenic effects mediated by the VEGFR. These findings further highlighted the central role played by TRPs interactions with other TRP channels, other channels families like that of BK channels, and the GCPRs, in affecting signaling pathways directly involved in carcinogenesis and brain tumor progression. Moreover, they strongly sustain the possible TRPs application in anti-angiogenic therapy.

However, to date, to the best of our knowledge TRPC6 is the only TRP channel directly implicated in GBM angiogenesis. TRPC6 has been found to play a key role in promoting

GBM growth, angiogenesis and invasion under hypoxia through Notch1 (Chigurupati et al., 2010). TRPC6 knockdown or NFAT inhibition has been shown to reduce the number of branch points and thus impair the ability of the hypoxic U373MG to induce endothelial cell tube formation *in vitro*, suggesting a role of TRPC6 in the “vascular mimicry” played by glioma cells (Chigurupati et al., 2010).

Other TRPs among those previously described to have a function in gliomas, such as TRPM2, TRPM7, TRPV2, and TRPV4 have also been found in brain vasculature, thus suggesting a possible double function for these channels in affecting glioma progression (Hatano et al., 2013; Pires and Earley, 2017; Ouyang et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2019) and contributing to GBM angiogenesis. Regarding TRPA1 and TRPC3 not likely described in glioma, some studies highlighted their involvement in other brain vasculature diseases, exerting a protective role against ischemic damage, controlling vasodilation in brain endothelial cells (Sullivan et al., 2016; Pires and Earley, 2018). TRPC3, when overexpressed, would lead to an increase in the BBB permeability, leading to vasogenic edema formation (Ryu et al., 2013).

## CONCLUSION

Taken together all these data suggest a key role of some TRP channels in high-grade glioma development and angiogenesis. The current activators or inhibitors directed against these channels should provide lead compounds and knowledge for future research in the design of drugs targeting simultaneously glioma cells and key components of the micro-environment such as abnormal tumoral vascularization.

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

DG and HC provided a rational of the study. GC performed an in-depth analysis of the roles of TRP channels in inducing glioma behavior and generated a preliminary draft. GC, HC, OC, and DG performed the literature searches and contributed to writing and editing of the content. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

## FUNDING

DG was supported by the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF). GC was supported by the University of Torino as part of the Ph.D. Program in Complex Systems for Life Sciences. HC and OC's work on glioma invasion and angiogenesis are supported by the Ligue contre le Cancer Normandie, Géfluc charity, and Fondation ARC.

## REFERENCES

Alifieris, C., and Trafalis, D. T. (2015). Glioblastoma multiforme: pathogenesis and treatment. *Pharmacol. Ther.* 152, 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.05.005

Alptekin, M., Eroglu, S., Tutar, E., Sencan, S., Geyik, M. A., Ulasli, M., et al. (2015). Gene expressions of TRP channels in glioblastoma multiforme and relation with survival. *Tumor Biol.* 36, 9209–9213. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3577-x

Amantini, C., Mosca, M., Nabissi, M., Lucciarini, R., Caprodossi, S., Arcella, A., et al. (2007). Capsaicin-induced apoptosis of glioma cells is mediated by
TRPV1 vanilloid receptor and requires p38 MAPK activation. *J. Neurochem.* 102, 977-990. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04582.x

Asuthkar, S., Velpula, K. K., Elustondo, P. A., and Demirkhanyan, L. (2015). TRPM8 channel as a novel molecular target in androgen- regulated prostate cancer cells. *Oncotarget* 6, 17221-17236.

Audic, Y., and Hartley, R. S. (2004). Post-transcriptional regulation in cancer. *Biol. Cell* 96, 479-498. doi: 10.1016/j.biolcel.2004.05.002

Bao, S., Wu, Q., Mclendon, R. E., Hao, Y., Shi, Q., Hjelmeland, A. B., et al. (2006a). Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. *Nature* 444, 756-760. doi: 10.1038/nature05236

Bao, S., Wu, Q., Sathornsumetee, S., Hao, Y., Li, Z., Hjelmeland, A. B., et al. (2006b). Stem cell-like glioma cells promote tumor angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor. *Cancer Res.* 66, 7843-7848. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1010

Bernardini, M., Brossa, A., Chinigo, G., Grolez, G. P., Trimaglio, G., Allart, L., et al. (2019). Transient receptor potential channel expression signatures in tumor-derived endothelial cells: functional roles in prostate cancer angiogenesis. *Cancers* 11:956.

Bian, X. W., Jiang, X. F., Chen, J. H., Bai, J. S., Dai, C., Wang, Q. L., et al. (2006). Increased angiogenic capabilities of endothelial cells from microvessels of malignant human gliomas. *Int. Immunopharmacol.* 6, 90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.08.004

Bidaux, G., Flourakis, M., Thebault, S., Zholos, A., Beck, B., Gkika, D., et al. (2007). Prostate cell differentiation status determines transient receptor potential melastatin member 8 channel subcellular localization and function. *J. Clin. Invest.* 117, 1647-1657. doi: 10.1172/JCI30168

Bidaux, G., Roudbaraki, M., Merle, C., Crépin, A., Delcourt, P., Slomianny, C., et al. (2005). Evidence for specific TRPM8 expression in human prostate secretory epithelial cells: functional androgen receptor requirement. *Endocr. Relat. Cancer* 12, 367-382. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.00969

Birchmeier, C., Birchmeier, W., Gherardi, E., and Vande Woude, G. F. (2003). Met, metastasis, motility and more. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* 4, 915-925. doi: 10.1038/nrm1261

Bomben, V. C., and Sontheimer, H. (2010). Disruption of transient receptor potential canonical channel 1 causes incomplete cytokinesis and slows the growth of human malignant gliomas. *Glia* 58, 1145-1156. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.371

Bomben, V. C., and Sontheimer, H. W. (2008). Inhibition of transient receptor potential canonical channels impairs cytokinesis in human malignant gliomas. *Cell Prolif.* 41, 98-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00504.x

Bomben, V. C., Turner, K. L., Barclay, T. C., and Sontheimer, H. (2011). Transient receptor potential canonical channels are essential for chemotactic migration of human malignant gliomas. *J. Cell Physiol.* 226, 1879-1888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956839

Bordey, A., and Sontheimer, H. (1998). Electrophysiological properties of human astrocytic tumor cells in situ: enigma of spiking glial cells. *J. Neurophysiol.* 79, 2782-2793. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.5.2782

Çetin, E. S., Naziroğlu, M., Çiğ, B., Övey, YŞ., and Aslan, P. (2017). Selenium potentiates the anticancer effect of cisplatin against oxidative stress and calcium ion signaling-induced intracellular toxicity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: involvement of the TRPV1 channel. *J. Recept. Signal. Transduct. Res.* 37, 84-93. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2016.1160931

Chigurupati, S., Venkataraman, R., Barrera, D., Naganathan, A., Madan, M., Paul, L., et al. (2010). Receptor channel TRPC6 is a key mediator of notch-driven glioblastoma growth and invasiveness. *Cancer Res.* 6, 418-428. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2654

Choudhary, S., Xiao, T., Vergara, L. A., Srivastava, S., Nees, D., Piatigorsky, J., et al. (2005). Role of aldehyde dehydrogenase isozymes in the defense of rat lens and human lens epithelial cells against oxidative stress. *Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.* 46, 259-267. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0120

Coly, P. M., Gandolfo, P., Castel, H., and Morin, F. (2017). The autophagy machinery: a new player in chemotactic cell migration. *Front. Neurosci.* 11:78. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00078

Cuddapah, V. A., and Sontheimer, H. (2011). Ion channels and transporters in cancer. 2. Ion channels and the control of cancer cell migration. *Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.* 301, C541-C549. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00102.2011

Demuth, T., and Berens, M. E. (2004). Molecular mechanisms of glioma cell migration and invasion. *J. Neurooncol.* 70, 217-228.

Deveci, H. A., Akyuva, Y., Nur, G., and Naziroğlu, M. (2019). Alpha lipoic acid attenuates hypoxia-induced apoptosis, inflammation and mitochondrial oxidative stress via inhibition of TRPA1 channel in human glioblastoma cell line. *Biomed. Pharmacother.* 111, 292-304. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.077

Ding, X., He, Z., Zhou, K., Cheng, J., Yao, H., Lu, D., et al. (2010). Essential role of TRPC6 channels in G2/M phase transition and development of human glioma. *J. Natl. Cancer Inst.* 102, 1052-1068. doi: 10.1093/jnci/diq217

Doñate-Macián, P., Gómez, A., Dégano, I. R., and Perálvarez-Marín, A. (2018). A TRPV2 interactome-based signature for prognosis in glioblastoma patients. *Oncotarget* 9, 18400-18409. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24843

Dosey, T. L., Wang, Z., Fan, G., Zhang, Z., Serysheva, I. I., Chiu, W., et al. (2019). Structures of TRPV2 in distinct conformations provide insight into role of the pore turret. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* 26, 40-49. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0168-8. Structures

Edalat, L., Stegen, B., Klumpp, L., Haehl, E., Schilbach, K., Lukowski, R., et al. (2016). BK K + channel blockade inhibits radiation-induced migration/brain infiltration of glioblastoma cells. *Oncotarget* 7, 14259-14278.

Ertilav, K., Naziroğlu, M., Ataizi, Z. S., and Braidy, N. (2019). Selenium enhances the apoptotic efficacy of docetaxel through activation of TRPM2 channel in DBTRG glioblastoma cells. *Neurotox. Res.* 35, 797-808. doi: 10.1007/s12640-019-0009-5

Fiorio Pla, A., and Gkika, D. (2013). Emerging role of TRP channels in cell migration: from tumor vascularization to metastasis. *Front. Physiol.* 4:311. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00311

Fischer, I., Gagner, J. P., Law, M., Newcomb, E. W., and Zagzag, D. (2005). Angiogenesis in gliomas: biology and molecular pathophysiology. *Brain Pathol.* 15, 297-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2005.tb00115.x

Flynn, J. R., Wang, L., Gillespie, D. L., Stoddard, G. J., Reid, J. K., Owens, J., et al. (2008). ). Hypoxia-regulated protein expression, patient characteristics, and preoperative imaging as predictors of survival in adults with glioblastoma multiforme. *Cancer* 113, 1032-1042.

Galluzzi, L., Pietrocola, F., Bravo-San Pedro, J. M., Amaravadi, R. K., Baehrecke, E. H., Cecconi, F., et al. (2015). Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression. *EMBO J.* 34, 856-880. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490784

Gebauer, F., and Hentze, M. W. (2004). Molecular mechanisms of translational control. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* 5, 827-835. doi: 10.1038/nrm1488

Gees, M., Colsoul, B., and Nilius, B. (2010). The role of transient receptor potential cation channels in Ca2+ signaling. *Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol.* 2, 1-32. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003962

Genova, T., Grolez, G. P., Camillo, C., Bernardini, M., Bokhobza, A., Richard, E., et al. (2017). TRPM8 inhibits endothelial cell migration via a nonchannel function by trapping the small GTPase Rap1. *J. Cell Biol.* 216, 2107-2130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201506024

Giese, A., Bjerkvig, R., Berens, M. E., and Westphal, M. (2003). Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 21, 1624-1636. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.063

Gkika, D., Flourakis, M., Lemonnier, L., and Prevarskaya, N. (2010). PSA reduces prostate cancer cell motility by stimulating TRPM8 activity and plasma membrane expression. *Oncogene* 29, 4611-4616. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.210

Gkika, D., Lemonnier, L., Shapovalov, G., Gordienko, D., Poux, C., Bernardini, M., et al. (2015). TRP channel-associated factors are a novel protein family that regulates TRPM8 trafficking and activity. *J. Cell Biol.* 208, 89-107. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201402076

Gkika, D., Lolignier, S., Grolez, G. P., Bavencoffe, A., Shapovalov, G., Gordienko, D., et al. (2020). Testosterone-androgen receptor: the steroid link inhibiting TRPM8-mediated cold sensitivity. *FASEB J.* 34, 7483-7499. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902270R

Gkika, D., and Prevarskaya, N. (2009). Molecular mechanisms of TRP regulation in tumor growth and metastasis. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1793, 953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.010

Grolez, G. P., Gordiendko, D. V., Clarisse, M., Hammadi, M., Desruelles, E., Fromont, G., et al. (2019a). TRPM8-androgen receptor association within lipid rafts promotes prostate cancer cell migration. *Cell Death Dis.* 10:652. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1891-8

Grolez, G. P., Hammadi, M., Barras, A., Gordienko, D., Slomianny, C., Völkel, P., et al. (2019b). Encapsulation of a TRPM8 Agonist, WS12, in lipid nanocapsules potentiates PC3 prostate cancer cell migration inhibition through channel activation. *Sci. Rep.* 9, 1-15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44452-4
Guéginouin, M., Harnois, T., Crottes, D., Uguen, A., Deliot, N., Gambade, A., et al. (2016). SK3/TRPC1/Orai1 complex regulates SOCE-dependent colon cancer cell migration: a novel opportunity to modulate anti-EGFR mAb action by the alkyl-lipid Ohmline. *Oncotarget* 7, 36168-36184. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8786

Guo, Y., Kenney, S. R., Muller, C. Y., Adams, S., Rutledge, T., Romero, E., et al. (2015). R-ketorolac targets Cdc42 and Rac1 and alters ovarian cancer cell behaviors critical for invasion and metastasis. *Mol. Cancer Ther.* 14, 2215-2227. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0419

Hatano, N., Suzuki, H., Itoh, Y., and Muraki, K. (2013). TRPV4 partially participates in proliferation of human brain capillary endothelial cells. *Life Sci.* 92, 317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.01.002

Hazane-Puch, F., Arnaud, J., Trocmé, C., Faure, P., Laporte, F., and Champelovier, P. (2016). Sodium selenite decreased HDAC activity, cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in three human glioblastoma cells. *Anticancer Agents Med. Chem.* 16, 490-500.

Higashimori, H., and Sontheimer, H. (2007). Role of Kir4.1 channels in growth control of glia. *Glia* 55, 1668-1679. doi: 10.1002/glia.20574

Hinnebusch, A. G., Ivanov, I. P., and Sonenberg, N. (2016). Translational control by 5'-untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. *Science* 352, 1413-1416. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9868

Ishii, M., Oyama, A., Hagiwara, T., Miyazaki, A., Mori, Y., Kiuchi, Y., et al. (2007). Facilitation of H2O2-induced A172 human glioblastoma cell death by insertion of oxidative stress-sensitive TRPM2 channels. *Anticancer Res.* 27, 3987-3992.

Karsy, M., Gelbman, M., Shah, P., Balumbu, O., Moy, F., and Arslan, E. (2012). Established and emerging variants of glioblastoma multiforme: review of morphological and molecular features. *Folia Neuropathol.* 50, 301-321. doi: 10.5114/fn.2012.32361

Kim, J. E., Park, J. Y., and Kang, T. C. (2017). TRPC6-mediated ERK1/2 activation regulates neuronal excitability via subcellular Kv4.3 localization in the rat hippocampus. *Front. Cell. Neurosci.* 11:413. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00413

Klumpp, D., Frank, S. C., Klumpp, L., Sezgin, E. C., Eckert, M., Edalat, L., et al. (2017). TRPM8 is required for survival and radioresistance of glioblastoma cells. *Oncotarget* 8, 95896-95913. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21436

Laterra, J., Rosen, E., Nam, M., Ranganathan, S., Fielding, K., and Johnston, P. (1997). Scatter Factor/Hepatocyte growth factor expression enhances human glioblastoma tumorigenicity and growth. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* 235, 743-747.

Lee, W. H., Choong, L. Y., Jin, T. H., Mon, N. N., Chong, S., Liew, C. S., et al. (2017). TRPV4 plays a role in breast cancer cell migration via Ca2+-dependent activation of AKT and downregulation of E-cadherin cell cortex protein. *Oncogenesis* 6:e338. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.39

Lepannetier, S., Zanou, N., Yerna, X., Emeriau, N., Dufour, I., Masquelier, J., et al. (2016). Sphingosine-1-phosphate-activated TRPC1 channel controls chemotaxis of glioblastoma cells. *Cell Calcium* 60, 373-383. doi: 10.1016/j.cea.2016.09.002

Li, H. (2017). "TRP channel classification," in *Transient Receptor Potential Canonical Channels and Brain Diseases Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology*, ed. Y. Wang (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 1-8. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-1088-4_1

Liberati, S., Morelli, M. B., Amantini, C., Santoni, M., Nabissi, M., Cardinali, C., et al. (2014). Advances in transient receptor potential vanilloid-2 channel expression and function in tumor growth and progression. *Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.* 15, 732-737.

Liu, C., Chang, C., Hsueh, K., Su, H., and Chiou, T. (2018). Migration/Invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for therapeutic treatment. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* 19:1115. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041115

Liu, J., Liu, X. U., Liu, Y., Sun, Y. N., Li, S., and Li, C. M. (2016). MicroRNA 28-5p regulates ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 via inhibiting extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2. *Mol. Med. Rep.* 13, 433-440. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4563

Liu, M., Inoue, K., Leng, T., Guo, S., and Xiong, Z. (2014). TRPM7 channels regulate glioma stem cell through STAT3 and Notch signaling pathways. *Cell. Signal.* 26, 2773-2781. doi: 10.1016/j cellsig.2014.08.020

Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., et al. (2007). The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. *Acta Neuropathol.* 114, 97-109. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

Louis, D. N., Perry, A., Reifenberger, G., von Deimling, A., Figarella-Branger, D., Cavenee, W. K., et al. (2016). The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. *Acta Neuropathol.* 131, 803-820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

Lucius, A., Khajavi, N., Reinach, P. S., Köhrle, J., Dhandapani, P., Huimann, P., et al. (2016). 3-Iodothyronamine increases transient receptor potential melastatin channel 8 (TRPM8) activity in immortalized human corneal epithelial cells. *Cell. Signal.* 28, 136-147. doi: 10.1016/j cellsig.2015.12.005

Luo, H., Rossi, E., Saubamea, B., Chasseigneaux, S., Cochois, V., Choublier, N., et al. (2019). Cannabidiol increases proliferation, migration, tubulogenesis, and integrity of human brain endothelial cells through TRPV2 activation. *Mol. Pharm.* 16, 1312-1326. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01252

Ma, I., and Allan, A. L. (2011). the role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells. *Stem Cell Rev. Rep.* 7, 292-306. doi: 10.1007/s12015-010-9208-4

Mayor, U., Johnson, C. M., Daggett, V., Brown, A., Nikolai, G., Bower, K. A., et al. (2001). Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: evidence from intracranial gliomas. *PNAS* 97, 12846-12851.

Mcferrin, M. B., and Sontheimer, H. (2006). A role for ion channels in glioma cell invasion. *Neuron Glia Biol.* 2, 39-49.

Miller, C. R., and Perry, A. (2007). Glioblastoma. *Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.* 131, 397-406.

Moini, H., Packer, L., and Saris, N. E. L. (2002). Antioxidant and prooxidant activities of α-lipoic acid and dihydrolipoic acid. *Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.* 182, 84-90. doi: 10.1006/taap.2002.9437

Molenaar, R. J. (2011). Ion channels in glioblastoma. *ISRN Neurol.* 2011, 1-7. doi: 10.5402/2011/590249

Mollinedo, F., and Gajate, C. (2015). Advances in biological regulation lipid rafts as major platforms for signaling regulation in cancer. *Adv. Biol. Regul.* 57, 130-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2014.10.003

Morelli, M. B., Amantini, C., Tomassoni, D., Nabissi, M., Arcella, A., and Santoni, G. (2019). Transient receptor potential mucolipin-1 channels in glioblastoma: role in patient's survival. *Cancers* 11:525. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040525

Morelli, M. B., Nabissi, M., Amantini, C., Farfariello, V., Ricci-Vitiani, L., Di Martino, S., et al. (2012). The transient receptor potential vanilloid-2 cation channel impairs glioblastoma stem-like cell proliferation and promotes differentiation. *Int. J. Cancer* 131, 1067-1077. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27588

Morelli, M. B., Nabissi, M., Amantini, C., Tomassoni, D., Rossi, F., Cardinali, C., et al. (2016). Overexpression of transient receptor potential mucolipin-2 ion channels in gliomas: role in tumor growth and progression. *Oncotarget* 7, 43654-43668. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9661

Nabissi, M., Morelli, M. B., Amantini, C., Farfariello, V., Ricci-Vitiani, L., Caprodossi, S., et al. (2010). TRPV2 channel negatively controls glioma cell proliferation and resistance to Fas-induced apoptosis in ERK-dependent manner. *Carcinogenesis* 31, 794-803. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq019

Nabissi, M., Morelli, M. B., Amantini, C., Liberati, S., Santoni, M., Ricci-Vitiani, L., et al. (2015). Cannabidiol stimulates AML-1a-dependent glial differentiation and inhibits glioma stem-like cells proliferation by inducing autophagy in a TRPV2-dependent manner. *Int. J. Cancer* 137, 1855-1869. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29573

Nabissi, M., Morelli, M. B., Arcella, A., Cardinali, C., Santoni, M., Bernardini, G., et al. (2016). Post-transcriptional regulation of 5'-untranslated regions of human transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1 (TRPV-1) channels: role in the survival of glioma patients. *Oncotarget* 7, 81541-81554. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13132

Nabissi, M., Morelli, M. B., Santoni, M., and Santoni, G. (2013). Triggering of the TRPV2 channel by cannabidiol sensitizes glioblastoma cells to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. *Carcinogenesis* 34, 48-57. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs328

Naziroğlu, M., and Lückhoff, A. (2008). Effects of antioxidants on calcium influx through TRPM2 channels in transfected cells activated by hydrogen peroxide
☆. *J. Neurol. Sci.* 270, 152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.03.003

Naziroğlu, M. (2012). Molecular role of catalase on oxidative stress-induced Ca2 signaling and TRP cation channel activation in nervous system. *J. Recept. Signal Transduct.* 32, 134-141. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2012.672994

Neumann-Raizel, H., Shilo, A., Lev, S., Mogilevsky, M., Katz, B., Shneor, D., et al. (2019). 2-APB and CBD-mediated targeting of charged cytotoxic compounds into tumor cells suggests the involvement of TRPV2 channels. *Front. Pharmacol.* 10:1198. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01198
Olsen, M. L., and Sontheimer, H. (2008). Functional implications for Kir4.1 channels in glial biology: from K + buffering to cell differentiation. *J. Neurochem.* 107, 589–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05615.x

Ostrom, Q. T., Gittleman, H., Fulop, J., Liu, M., Blanda, R., Kromer, C., et al. (2015). CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. *Neuro Oncol.* 17, iv1–iv62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov189

Ostrom, Q. T., Gittleman, H., Liao, P., Vecchione-Koval, T., Wolinsky, Y., Kruchko, C., et al. (2017). CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010–2014. *Neuro Oncol.* 19, v1–v88. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox158

Ou-yang, Q., Li, B., Xu, M., and Liang, H. (2018). TRPV4 promotes the migration and invasion of glioma cells via AKT/Rac1 signaling. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* 503, 876–881. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcrr.2018.06.090

Peier, A. M., Moqrich, A., Hergarden, A. C., Reeve, A. J., Andersson, D. A., Story, G. M., et al. (2002). A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli and menthol. *Cell* 108, 705–715.

Peng, W., Wong, Y. C., and Krainc, D. (2020). Mitochondria-lysosome contacts regulate mitochondrial Ca2+ dynamics via lysosomal TRPML1. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 117, 19266–19275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200326117

Pires, P. W., and Earley, S. (2017). Redox regulation of transient receptor potential channels in the endothelium. *Microcirculation* 24:10.1111/micc.12329. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040

Pires, P. W., and Earley, S. (2018). Neuroprotective effects of trpa1 channels in the cerebral endothelium following ischemic stroke. *eLife* 7, 1–29. doi: 10.7554/ eLife.35316

Prabhu, A., Kesarwani, P., Kant, S., Graham, S. F., and Chinnaiyan, P. (2017). Histologically defined intratumoral sequencing uncovers evolutionary cues into conserved molecular events driving gliomagenesis. *Neuro Oncol.* 19, 1599–1606. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox100

Prevarskaya, N., Zhang, L., and Barritt, G. (2007). TRP channels in cancer. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.* 1772, 937–946. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.05.006

Qin, W., Xiaofeng, R., Jiangchuan, D., Yu, C., and Juan, Y. (2017). MiR-142 inhibits the migration and invasion of glioma by targeting Rac1. *Oncol. Rep.* 38, 1543–1550. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5816

Ransom, C. B., O’Neal, J. T., and Sontheimer, H. (2001). Volume-activated chloride currents contribute to the resting conductance and invasive migration of human glioma cells. *J. Neurosci.* 21, 7674–7683. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-19- 07674.2001

Ransom, C. B., and Sontheimer, H. (2001). BK channels in human glioma cells. *J. Neurophysiol.* 85, 790–803.

Rasper, M., Schafer, A., Piontek, G., Teufel, J., Brockhoff, G., Ringel, F., et al. (2010). Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 positive glioblastoma cells show brain tumor stem cell capacity. *Neuro Oncol.* 12, 1024–1033.

Ratto, D., Ferrari, B., Roda, E., Brandalise, F., Siciliani, S., De Luca, F., et al. (2020). Squaring the circle: a new study of inward and outward-rectifying potassium currents in U251 GBM cells. *Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.* 40, 813–828. doi: 10.1007/ s10571-019-00776-3

Rho, S., Kobayashi, I., Rho, S., Kobayashi, I., Oguri-nakamura, E., Ando, K., et al. (2019). Rap1b promotes notch-signal-mediated hematopoietic stem cell development by enhancing integrin-mediated cell adhesion. *Dev. Cell* 49, 681.e6–696.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.023

Ryu, H. J., Kim, J. E., Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. Y., Kim, W. Il, Choi, S. Y., et al. (2013). Endothelial transient receptor potential conical channel (TRPC)-3 activation induces vasogenic edema formation in the rat piriform cortex following status epilepticus. *Cel. Mol. Neurobiol.* 33, 575–585. doi: 10.1007/s10571-013- 9931-x

Santoni, G., and Farfariello, V. (2011). TRP channels and cancer: new targets for diagnosis and chemotherapy. *Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets* 11, 54–67. doi: 10.2174/187153011794982068

Schwartzbaum, J. A., Fisher, J. L., Aldape, K. D., and Wrensch, M. (2006). Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma. *Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol.* 2, 494–503.

Shi, X., and Teng, F. (2015). Down-regulated miR-28-5p in human hepatocellular carcinoma correlated with tumor proliferation and migration by targeting. *Mol. Cell. Biochem.* 408, 283–293. doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2506-z

Singh, I., Knezevic, N., Ahmmed, G. U., Kini, V., Malik, A. B., and Mehta, D. (2007). Gαq -TRPC6-mediated Ca 2+ Entry Induces RhoA activation and

resultant endothelial cell shape change in response to thrombin. *J. Biol. Chem.* 282, 7833–7843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608288200

Stark, G. R., and Taylor, W. R. (2006). Control of the G2/M transition. *Mol. Biotechnol.* 32, 227–248. doi: 10.1385/MB:32:3:227

Steinle, M., Palme, D., Misovic, M., Rudner, J., Dittmann, K., Lukowski, R., et al. (2011). Ionizing radiation induces migration of glioblastoma cells by activating BK K + channels. *Radiother. Oncol.* 101, 122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011. 05.069

Stepanenko, A. A., and Chekhonin, V. P. (2018). Recent advances in oncolytic virotherapy and immunotherapy for glioblastoma: a glimmer of hope in the search for an effective therapy? *Cancers* 10:492. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120492

Stock, K., Kumar, J., Synowitz, M., Petrosino, S., Imperatore, R., Smith, E. S. J., et al. (2012). Neural precursor cells induce cell death of high-grade astrocytomas through stimulation of TRPV1. *Nat. Med.* 18, 1232–1238. doi: 10.1038/nm.2827

Stuart, E. T., Kioussi, C., Gruss, P., and Aguzzi, A. (1995). PAX5 expression correlates with increasing malignancy in human astrocytomas. *Clin. Cancer Res.* 1, 207–214.

Stupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Janzer, R. C., et al. (2009). Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. *Lancet. Oncol.* 10, 459–466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7

Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., et al. (2005). Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. *N. Engl. J. Med.* 352, 987–996. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa043330

Sullivan, M. N., Gonzales, A. L., Pires, P. W., Bruhl, A., Leo, M. D., Li, W., et al. (2016). Oxygen species promote cerebral artery dilation. *Sci. Signal.* 8, 1–26. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.20056595. Localized

Tai, Y., Feng, S., Ge, R., Du, W., Zhang, X., He, Z., et al. (2008). TRPC6 channels promote dendritic growth via the CaMKIV-CREB pathway. *J. Cell Sci.* 121, 2301–2307. doi: 10.1242/jcs.026906

Takahashi, N., Chen, H. Y., Harris, I. S., Stover, D. G., Selfors, L. M., Bronson, R. T., et al. (2018). Cancer cells co-opt the neuronal redox-sensing channel TRPA1 to promote oxidative-stress tolerance. *Cancer Cell* 33, 985.e7–1003.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.001

Takahashi, N., Kozai, D., Kobayashi, R., Ebert, M., and Mori, Y. (2011). Cell calcium roles of TRPM2 in oxidative stress. *Cell Calcium* 50, 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j. ceca.2011.04.006

Thompson, C. B. (1995). Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. *Science* 267, 1456–1462.

Valadez, J. A., and Cuajungco, M. P. (2015). PAX5 is the transcriptional activator of mucolipin-2 (MCOLN2) gene. *Gene* 555, 194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014. 11.003

Veldhuis, N. A., Poole, D. P., Grace, M., McIntyre, P., and Bunnett, N. W. (2015). The g protein-coupled receptor–transient receptor potential channel axis: molecular insights for targeting disorders of sensation and inflammation. *Pharmacol. Rev.* 67, 36–73. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009555

Venkatachalam, K., and Montell, C. (2007). TRP channels. *Annu. Rev. Biochem.* 76, 387–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142819

Venugopal, B., Mesires, N. T., Kennedy, J. C., Curcio-Morelli, C., Laplante, J. M., Dice, J. F., et al. (2009). Chaperone-mediated autophagy is defective in mucolipidosis type IV. *J. Cell. Physiol.* 219, 344–353. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21676

Walcher, L., Budde, C., Böhm, A., Reinach, P. S., Dhandapani, P., Ljubojevic, N., et al. (2018). Induced transactivation of TRPV1 in human uveal melanoma cells. *Front. Pharmacol.* 9:1234. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01234

Walzlein, J.-H., Synowitz, M., Engels, B., Markovic, D. S., Gabrusiewicz, K., Nikolaev, E., et al. (2008). Antitumorigenic response of neural precursors depends on subventricular proliferation and age. *Stem Cells* 26, 2945–2954. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0307

Wan, J., Guo, A. A., Chowdhury, I., and Guo, S. (2019). TRPM7 induces mechanistic target of rap1b through the downregulation of miR-28-5p in glioma proliferation and invasion. *Front. Oncol.* 9:1413. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019. 01413

Watkins, S., Robel, S., Kimbrough, I. F., Robert, S. M., Ellis-Davies, G., and Sontheimer, H. (2014). Disruption of astrocyte-vascular coupling and the blood-brain barrier by invading glioma cells. *Nat. Commun.* 5, 1–15. doi: 10. 1038/ncomms5196
Wen, P. Y., and Brandes, A. A. (2009). Treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. *Curr. Opin. Neurol.* 22, 657–664. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833229e3

Wondergem, R., and Bartley, J. W. (2009). Menthol increases human glioblastoma intracellular Ca2+, BK channel activity and cell migration. *J. Biomed. Sci.* 16, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-90

Wondergem, R., Ecay, T. W., Mahieu, F., Owsianik, G., and Nilius, B. (2008). Biochemical and biophysical research communications HGF/SF and menthol increase human glioblastoma cell calcium and migration. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* 372, 210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.032

Xiao, F., Cheng, Z., Wang, P., Gong, B., Huang, H., Xing, Y., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-28-5p inhibits the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by suppressing AKT phosphorylation. *Oncol. Lett.* 15, 9777–9785. doi: 10.3892/ol. 2018.8603

Yao, X. H., Ping, Y.-F., Chen, J.-H., Xu, C.-P., Chen, D.-L., Zhang, R., et al. (2008). Glioblastoma stem cells produce vascular endothelial growth factor by activation of a G-protein coupled formylpeptide receptor FPR. *J. Pathol.* 215, 369–376. doi: 10.1002/path.2356.Glioblastoma

Ying, Z., Li, Y., Wu, J., Zhu, X., Yang, Y., Tian, H., et al. (2013). Loss of miR-204 expression enhances glioma migration and stem cell-like phenotype. *Cancer Res.* 73, 990–1000. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2895

Yu, X., Jiang, Y., Wei, W., and Cong, P. (2015). Androgen receptor signaling regulates growth of glioblastoma multiforme in men. *Tumour. Biol.* 36, 967–972. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2709-z

Zamudio-Bulcock, P. A., Everett, J., Harteneck, C., and Valenzuela, C. F. (2011). Activation of steroid-sensitive TRPM3 channels potentiates glutamatergic transmission at cerebellar purkinje neurons from developing rats. *Neurochem. J.* 119, 474–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07441.x

Zeng, J., Wu, Y., Zhuang, S., Qin, L., Hua, S., Mungur, R., et al. (2019). Identification of the role of TRPM8 in glioblastoma and its effect on proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of the U251 human glioblastoma cell line. *Oncol. Rep.* 42, 1517–1526. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.7260

Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Yu, L., Yang, J., Calvo, R., Patnaik, S., et al. (2016a). MCOLN1 is a ROS sensor in lysosomes that regulates autophagy. *Nat. Commun.* 7:12109. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12109

Zhang, X., Yu, L., and Xu, H. (2016b). Lysosome calcium in ROS regulation of autophagy. *Autophagy* 12, 1954–1955. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1212787

Zhou, J., Du, W., Zhou, K., Tai, Y., Yao, H., Jia, Y., et al. (2008). Critical role of TRPC6 channels in the formation of excitatory synapses. *Nat. Neurosci.* 11, 741–743. doi: 10.1038/nn.2127

Zhou, K., Rao, J., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Z. H., Yao, X. H., Wu, F., et al. (2018). RAC1-GTP promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion of colorectal cancer by activation of STAT3. *Lab. Invest.* 98, 989–998. doi: 10.1038/s41374- 018-0071-2

**Conflict of Interest:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Chinigò, Castel, Chever and Gkika. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.