# The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus

Brigitte Dreno, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Giselle de Barros Silva, Julie Ryan Wolf, Delphine Kerob, Mark Trombetta, Etienne Atenguena, Pascale Dielenseger, Meng Pan, Florian Scotte, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Brigitte Dreno, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Giselle de Barros Silva, Julie Ryan Wolf, Delphine Kerob, et al.. The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31 (12), pp.672. 10.1007/s00520-023-08116-4. inserm-04271317

HAL Id: inserm-04271317

https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-04271317

Submitted on 6 Nov 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus

Brigitte Dreno¹ · Kiarash Khosrotehrani² · Giselle De Barros Silva³ · Julie Ryan Wolf⁴ · Delphine Kerob⁵ · Mark Trombetta⁶ · Etienne Atenguena⁷ · Pascale Dielenseger⁸,⁹,¹⁰ · Meng Pan¹¹ · Florian Scotte¹²,¹³ · Ivan Krakowski¹⁴,¹⁵ · Mario Lacouture¹⁶

Received: 16 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 October 2023 / Published online: 4 November 2023
© The Author(s) 2023

## Abstract

Skin toxicities are very common in patients undergoing cancer treatment and have been found to occur with all types of cancer therapeutic interventions (cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy). Further, skin toxicities can lead to interruption or even discontinuation of anticancer treatment in some patients, translating to sub-optimal outcomes. Dermocosmetics (or cosmeceuticals)—defined as skincare solutions incorporating dermatologically active ingredients (beyond vehicle effects) that directly improve symptoms of various skin conditions—are increasingly being used in cancer care to prevent and manage skin toxicities. The active ingredients in these products have a measurable biological action in skin; they typically improve skin integrity (barrier function/hydration and other factors) while relieving skin symptoms. The Association Francophone des Soins Oncologiques de Support (AFSOS) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) partnered to select a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients with cancer and skin toxicities. The group reviewed existing literature and created a summary of recommendations for managing these toxicities through online meetings and communication. In this publication, the group (1) reviews new skin toxicities seen with oncology drugs and (2) evaluates the role of dermocosmetics in improving patient outcomes and minimizing cancer treatment interruptions. We provide general recommendations for initiation and selection of skin care in all oncology patients as well as recommendations for what factors should be considered when using dermocosmetics in specific types of skin toxicities.

**Keywords** Oncodermatology · Dermocosmetics · Cosmeceuticals · Skin toxicity · Cancer management · Anticancer therapeutics

## Introduction

Recent advances in both anticancer treatments and understanding of pathogenesis of various cancers have led to individualized patient care. This has increased tolerability of treatments and steadily improved outcomes, with major benefits apparent in both the duration of survival and proportion of patients who survive [1–3]. Yet conventional cytotoxic, radiotherapeutic cancer treatments, and newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies have associated adverse events, among which skin toxicities are the most common [2–4]. It is important for members of the cancer treatment team to have solid knowledge of therapy-induced skin toxicities so that management can be optimized [3].

Patients with cancer have unique dermatologic needs, since skin toxicities are prevalent and are associated with a high physical burden [5, 6]. These toxicities may include pruritus, xosis, facial papules and pustules (drug-induced folliculitis, also known as acneiform rash), hand-foot reaction, alopecia, and other skin problems [5]. They can occur because anticancer agents affect rapidly proliferating cells, which include cancer cells but also normal cells such as skin [7–10]. While skin problems are very common, they can often be given a low priority compared to the clinical tumor responses or life-threatening side effects such as neutropenia [5]. However, skin problems may lead to an impairment in interpersonal and emotional well-being [5]. Further, skin problems may be painful or disfiguring or have a high emotional impact because patients may be forced to reveal their cancer whether they want to or not [1, 4, 5, 11]. Finally, skin

<footnote>Extended author information available on the last page of the article</footnote>
problems can affect the patient’s ability to continue anti-cancer treatment [5, 12]. Several studies have shown that facial skin rashes are associated with a high rate of oncologic treatment dose reductions and treatment discontinuation, which may be detrimental to treatment outcome [8, 12–14]. Patients have indicated that they need more information and support for handling adverse events, including skin toxicities [15].

Researchers are still working to elucidate the exact mechanisms of skin toxicities during cancer therapy [13]. However, it is thought that the primary mechanisms include alterations in skin barrier function and microbiota, inducing mainly inflammation, autoimmune responses, and phototoxicity. The risk for skin toxicities could be increased in older adults and those who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors; similarly, pigmentation abnormalities are a risk among those with darker skin types [16]. Minimizing alterations in skin barrier function and photoprotection are key to prevention of skin toxicities.

Since 2006, there has been interest in including dermatologists in the cancer care team, since dermatologic adverse events were frequently responsible for dose modification or interruption of anticancer therapy [17]. Since then the field of oncodermatology has blossomed, and there is increasing access for the cancer care team to dermatology protocols. As recently as 2022, Barrios et al. showed that involvement of dermatologists with the oncology care team increased the rate of positive outcomes and decreased potential for skin toxicity recurrence [18]. These researchers concluded that the result was “impactful reductions in interruption of anticancer therapy” [18]. In 2020, Chen et al. had reported similar beneficial results among a group of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [19]. The authors came together as a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals involved in cancer care—oncologists, radiation therapists, dermatologists, and nurses—with the goal of providing guidance on how to incorporate skin care into cancer management strategies. Today, “skin care” as an umbrella term covers a myriad of products, including a variety of cleansers, moisturizers, emollients, and others. A combination of cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen is important for all patients undergoing cancer therapy; in addition, daily skincare with more active ingredients may be prescribed for patients. In recent years, a category of products known as dermocosmetics or cosmeceuticals has risen to prominence [20]. These products can be defined as skincare solutions incorporating dermatologically active ingredients that directly improve symptoms of various skin conditions (beyond any expected vehicle effects). The active ingredients in these products have a measurable biological action in skin; they typically improve skin integrity (barrier function, hydration, and other factors) while relieving skin symptoms. We have provided recommendations for skin

care in cancer patients, with an emphasis on dermocosmetics when appropriate.

## Methods

A partnership between Association Francophone des Soins Oncologiques de Support (French-speaking Association for Oncological Supportive Care, AFSOS) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) was formed to select a multidisciplinary panel of healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients with cancer and skin toxicities. A total of 10 healthcare professionals represented the fields of dermatology, oncology, radiation sciences, and nursing and came from the main regions of the world.

The group evaluated a literature review of the latest data regarding new drugs approved and side effects as well as studies related to oncology skin supportive care. This review included guidelines, consensus papers, reviews on the management of skin toxicities, as well clinical and other research studies, with a focus on those published in the English language. Experts met for an online 4-h meeting to discuss role of dermocosmetics and their current best practices. The results are summarized in this publication.

## Recommendations

### Skincare in prevention and treatment

While management approaches may be individualized in accordance with the specific oncologic treatment and patient risk profile, there are general daily skin care approaches that should be used for the majority of cancer patients from the initiation of therapy [1, 4]. Prevention is a key element of managing skin toxicities, although it is perhaps not as widely used as we could hope [14]. We recommend that the oncology multidisciplinary team familiarize themselves with skin care basics and develop a standard protocol for implementing cleansers and moisturizers for cancer patients, along with sunscreen in the appropriate times of year/regions. Some dermocosmetics are formulated for—and tested in—skin that is fragile, pathological, and sensitive; formulations should be free of additives, irritants such as fragrances or perfumes, sensitizing agents, and herbal extracts (as much as possible) [1, 13]. These may be more appropriate for prevention and management of skin toxicities [13]. Fig. 1 presents a graphic illustration of steps in managing skin toxicities.

Appropriate skin care supports and maintains the epidermal skin barrier and skin microbiota. It is crucial to maintain the diversity of microbiota since this affects

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Steps in managing skin toxicities</figcaption></figure>

innate immunity. Skin hydration relieves symptoms and, if a skin toxicity does occur, can reduce exacerbations that may lead to secondary infections [1, 13]. Cleansers should have a pH close to that of skin (~5), and basic and neutral pH cleansers should be avoided [1, 3, 13]. Emollients may include ingredients such as shea butter and niacinamide to improve skin barrier; and/or *Aqua Posae Filiformis* (APF) and microresyl to reinforce skin physical barrier and maintain a well-diversified microbiota. Urea can be important, particularly for hands and feet, since it has both exfoliating and hydrating actions [21]. However, urea should be avoided in cases of radiation dermatitis and used with caution in red or irritated areas. Topical moisturizers and emollients help maintain skin hydration, reducing the likelihood of fissures and cracks [3, 13]. Protecting epidermal barrier function can also reduce the risk of xerosis induced by treatments. Although not in the cancer setting, ceramide-rich moisturizers and cleansers have been shown to relieve moderate eczema due to their ability of modulate water and maintain skin permeability [22]. Increasing ceramides can help maintain a healthy diversified microbiome. Finally, gentle cover makeup may help cover lesions and improve quality of life and self-esteem for patients [3].

It is imperative to educate patients to avoid products containing allergens and irritants (preservatives, fragrances, perfumes) [14]. Alkaline cleansing products (especially with pH 7 or higher) should be avoided due to the potential for triggering inflammation and reducing microbiome diversity

[14]. Use alpha hydroxy acids (lactic acid, glycolic acid) with caution, since they may alter skin surface pH and/or be irritating [14].

## Active cosmetics used in specific toxicities

### Xerosis/pruritus

Xerosis and pruritus are associated with many types of cancer treatments (Table 1) and typically appear several weeks after initiation of antineoplastic treatment [3, 13, 23]. Xerosis, which often presents as diffuse fine scaling, may occur in up to 84% of patients, depending on the treatment [12, 13]. When present on hands or feet, xerosis may lead to pain and fissuring [3, 24]. Valentine et al. conducted a systematic review of xerosis in patients receiving targeted therapies, which included meta-analysis of clinical trials and covered the period of 1966 to 2013. The findings revealed that xerosis occurred in 17.9% of cancer-treated patients overall and was high grade in 1.0% [25]. Risk for xerosis was affected by older age, concomitant medications and comorbidities, and pre-existing malignancies or skin problems [25]. If xerosis progresses, asteatotic eczema can occur and can be a site for secondary infection with *Staphylococcus aureus* or *Herpes simplex* [3].

Emollients are a key dermocosmetic to employ for xerosis, particularly those containing urea and niacinamide, as they maintain maximal skin hydration [3, 13, 26]. Emollient plus an acidic (pH 5.5) cleanser have been shown to
<table><caption>**Table 1** Summary of adverse effects and management approaches</caption><thead><tr><th>Type of AE</th><th>Type of treatment</th><th>Proactive (prevention/step 0)</th><th>Reactive (management in case of AE)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">Xerosis/pruritus</td><td>• Targeted therapy (EGFR inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, FGFR inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors)</td><td>• Initiate at same time as cancer treatment<br>• Gentle cleanser close to skin pH with lipid replenishing ingredient</td><td>• Gentle cleanser close to skin pH with lipid replenishing ingredient<br>• Emollients "plus" balm, able to rebalance microbiome, with key ingredients such as shea butter, niacinamide, and/or ceramides</td></tr><tr><td>• Cytotoxic chemotherapy</td><td>• Moisturizers, including moisturizers able to maintain diverse skin microbiome (emollient "plus"), with key ingredients such as shea butter, niacinamide, and/or ceramides</td><td>• Preferred formulas: moisturizing cream and balms<br>• Urea 3–10% in case of severe xerosis; avoid in red/irritated areas and with radiation dermatitis</td></tr><tr><td>• Radiation therapy</td><td>• Apply moisturizer to face, hands, feet, neck, and back daily plus re-apply as needed</td><td>• Hydrating lip balms, preferably with sunscreen<br>• If eczematiform eruption:<br>• TCS/TCI once-twice per day (maximum of 4 weeks for TCS) might be needed if pruritus uncontrolled by dermocosmetics</td></tr><tr><td>• Immune checkpoint inhibitors</td><td></td><td>• Antihistamines<br>• GABA agonist<br>• Doxepin/aprepitant/antidepressants<br>• TENS or acupuncture</td></tr><tr><td>• Targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitors)</td><td>• Emollients "plus" balm, able to rebalance microbiome, with key ingredients such as shea butter, niacinamide, and/or ceramides</td><td>• Continue Step 0<br>• Camphor-menthol-hydrocortisone cream<br>• Topical antiprurities</td></tr><tr><td>• Conventional chemotherapy<br>- Antimetabolites (5-FU etc.)</td><td>• Moisturizers with key ingredients such as shea butter, niacinamide, ceramides</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>- Alkylating agents (cyclophosamide, cisplatin)</td><td>• Sunscreen with UV broad spectrum UVA/UVB filters to prevent possible PIH in darker phototypes</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>- Mitotic inhibitors (taxanes, vinca alkaloids)</td><td></td><td>• TCS (once-twice per day for a maximum of 4 weeks)<br>• Oral antihistamines<br>• Oral corticosteroids for grade 3 toxicities<br>• Oncologist may suspend or alter treatment at grade 3; resume after 2 weeks if rash has faded to 0–1</td></tr><tr><td>• Immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-Nectin 4)</td><td></td><td>• Grade 4, admit to hospital<br>• Continue Step 0<br>• Moisturizing cream and balms<br>• Barrier repair cream on face such as soothing balm, able to rebalance microbiome with ingredients such as panthenol<br>• Acne dermocosmetics with niacinamide</td></tr><tr><td>• Targeted therapy (EGFR inhibitors including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors)</td><td>• Gentle cleanser with pH ~5<br>• Moisturizer<br>• Sunscreen with UV broad spectrum (UVA/UVB) on all sun exposed areas. Patients with darker phototypes are at higher risk for PIH</td><td>• Minocycline/doxycycline<br>• Topical corticosteroids after checking there is no local superinfection<br>• Systemic steroids³<br>• If not enough, oncologist may suspend or alter treatment</td></tr><tr><td>• Multikinase inhibitors</td><td>• Oral doxycycline² (100 mg BID) or minocycline when using EGFR and MEK inhibitors</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1 (continued)**</caption><thead><tr><th>Type of AE</th><th>Type of treatment</th><th>Proactive (prevention/step 0)</th><th>Reactive (management in case of AE)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">Photosensitivity</td><td>• BRAF inhibitors</td><td>• Gentle cleanser with pH ~ 5</td><td>• Continue Step 0</td></tr><tr><td>• EGFR inhibitors</td><td>• Sun avoidance: especially direct sun at mid-day*</td><td>• Cool colloidal oatmeal baths may help</td></tr><tr><td>• Multikinase inhibitors</td><td>• Sun protection when outside with UV broad spectrum UVB/UVA SPF 50 or greater sunscreens and strong UVA protection, especially with targeted therapy: clothing, sunglasses, and hats; patients with darker phototypes are at higher risk for PH</td><td>• Soothing emollients</td></tr><tr><td>• Vandetanib</td><td>• Reapply sunscreen q2h</td><td>• Aloe vera</td></tr><tr><td>• Chemotherapy (fluorouracil, dacarbazine, methotrexate, paclitaxel, vinblastine)</td><td>• Educate patient that sun can penetrate glass windows and in cloudy weather (home, car, workplace)</td><td>• NSAIDs, other painkillers</td></tr><tr><td>• Radiation therapy</td><td>• Gentle cleanser with pH ~ 5</td><td>• Topical corticosteroids</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10">Skin/nail pigmentation changes</td><td>• Conventional chemotherapy</td><td>• Sun avoidance: especially direct sun at mid-day*</td><td>• Continue Step 0</td></tr><tr><td>• Antimetabolites (5-FU etc.)</td><td>• Sun protection when outside with UV broad spectrum UVB/UVA SPF 50 or greater sunscreens and strong UVA protection, especially with targeted therapy: clothing, sunglasses, and hats; patients with darker phototypes are at higher risk for PH</td><td>• Dermocosmetics containing niacinamide</td></tr><tr><td>• Alkylating agents (cyclophosamide, cisplatin)</td><td>• Reapply sunscreen q2h</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• Mitotic inhibitors (taxanes, vinca alkaloids)</td><td>• Opaque nail lacquers</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• Cytotoxic (bleomycin)</td><td>• Avoid heat, humidity</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• EGFR/HER inhibitors</td><td>• Moisturizer with urea 10%⁴</td><td>• Topical corticosteroids</td></tr><tr><td>• Capecitabine</td><td>• For doxorubicin and taxane infusions – cooling gloves/socks during infusions including 15 min before and 30 min after⁵</td><td>• Hydroquinone for hyperpigmentation (limited to 6 months of use maximum)</td></tr><tr><td>• Multikinase, checkpoint inhibitors</td><td>• Optional</td><td>• Continue Step 0</td></tr><tr><td>• MEK/BRAF/VEGFR inhibitors</td><td>• Oral steroids for doxorubicin HFS, celecoxib for capecitabine⁶</td><td>• Moisturizing cream and balms</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Inflammatory hand and foot syndrome</td><td>• Conventional chemotherapy</td><td></td><td>• Monitor for change in severity</td></tr><tr><td>• Liposomal doxorubicin</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• Mitotic inhibitors (taxanes)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>• Capecitabine (5-FU)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Hyperkeratotic HFS</td><td>• Targeted therapy: RAS-BRAF MEK-ERK inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors</td><td>• Gentle cleanser with pH ~ 5</td><td>• TCS (once-twice per day for a maximum of 4 weeks) including under occlusion</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>• Moisturizer with urea 10% (2–3 times per day)⁷</td><td>• Oral dexamethasone</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>• Remove hyperkeratosis before the start of treatment (pedicure)</td><td>• For capecitabine, on/off regimens can help reduce HFS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>• Soft/padded footwear, avoid walking barefoot, avoid high heels</td><td>• Oncologists may reduce, interrupt, or discontinue treatment at higher grades</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1 (continued)**</caption><thead><tr><th>Type of AE</th><th>Type of treatment</th><th>Proactive (prevention/step 0)</th><th>Reactive (management in case of AE)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Acute radiation dermatitis</td><td><ul><li>Radiation therapy, enhanced by concomitant chemotherapy or targeted therapy (especially 5-fluorouracil and EGFR inhibitors) but not necessarily by checkpoint inhibitors</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Clobetasol<sup>8</sup></li><li>Cleanser with pH~5</li><li>Daily moisturizer* but not to be applied within 2 h before radiation therapy</li><li>Sun protection when outside with UV broad spectrum UVB/UVA SPF 50 or greater sunscreens and strong UVA protection, especially with targeted therapy; clothing, sunglasses, and hats; patients with darker phototypes are at higher risk for PIH</li><li>Avoidance of skin irritants</li><li>Compression stockings for field cancerization on legs</li><li>Aloe vera on Day 1 and throughout the course (apply post-treatment daily)</li><li>Cocoa butter prophylaxis daily during radiation therapy and one month beyond for darker skinned patients</li><li>Sterile transparent film dressing from Day 1 through one week post radiation therapy (applied continuously)</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Lidocaine patches/cream (as needed for pain)</li><li>Painkillers, NSAIDs</li><li>Potent topical corticosteroids</li><li>Oncologist may reduce, interrupt, or discontinue treatment at higher grades</li><li>Gentle skin care</li><li>Zinc oxide for low infectious risk dermatitis (non-immunosuppressed patients)</li><li>Silvadene if risk of superinfection or refractory to OTC topicals</li><li>Drying solution TID as drying/healing agent</li><li>Lidocaine 2% gel for pain</li><li>Wound hydrogel pads for inflammatory reactions in regions that can support the pad without adhesive (such as infirammary fold)</li><li>Medicated powder for initial moist desquamation, also provides antifungal activity</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic radiation dermatitis</td><td><ul><li>Radiation therapy, enhanced by concomitant chemotherapy or targeted therapy (especially 5-fluorouracil and EGFR inhibitors) but not necessarily by checkpoint inhibitors</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Proper radiation therapy techniques</li><li>Gentle cleanser with pH~5</li><li>Moisturizer</li><li>Sun protection</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Mid potency TCS</li><li>Monitor for secondary infection (culture and oral antibiotic as needed)</li><li>Antibiotics in case of superinfection</li><li>Oncologist may interrupt treatment in case of grade 3 ulceration</li><li>Gentle skin care</li><li>Educate patient about risk of late development of skin cancers in treated areas</li><li>Thermal water</li><li>Thermal cure</li><li>Pentoxifylline 400 mg TID to prevent radiation induced fibrosis (in later part of radiation therapy or following development of fibrosis; use for at least 6 months as long as it is still improving the condition)</li><li>Vitamin E (use with caution in patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy)</li><li>Microblading/semi-permanent tattooing of eyebrows</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Alopecia from chemotherapy</td><td><ul><li>Conventional chemotherapy (alkylating agents, antimetabolites, mitotic inhibitors)</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Scalp cooling for cytotoxic infused chemotherapy<sup>9</sup></li><li>Gentle shampoo</li><li>Moisturizing cream</li></ul></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1 (continued)**</caption><thead><tr><th>Type of AE</th><th>Type of treatment</th><th>Proactive (prevention/step 0)</th><th>Reactive (management in case of AE)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Alopecia from hormonal and targeted therapy</td><td><ul><li>Aromatase inhibitors</li><li>Kinase inhibitors: FGF, BRAF, CDK inhibitors</li><li>Sonic hedgehog inhibitors</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Gentle shampoo</li><li>Moisturizing cream</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Topical bimatoprost can be considered with eyelash loss</li><li>Oral vitamins (consider zinc in combination with spironolactone in zinc-deficient patients)</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Hypertrichosis and trichomegaly</td><td><ul><li>EGFR inhibitors</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>None</li></ul></td><td><ul><li>Topical 5% and oral minoxidil</li><li>PRP for patients who cannot tolerate minoxidil</li><li>Spironolactone</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><ul><li>Hypertrichosis: cosmetic techniques, laser, epilation, threading</li><li>Trichomegaly: eyelash clipping, referral to ophthalmologist</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table>

**BRAF** BRAF gene, **CDK** cyclin dependent kinase, **EGFR** epidermal growth factor receptor gene, **ERK** extracellular signal-regulated kinase, **FGF** fibroblast growth factor, **FGFR** FGF receptor, **HER** human epidermal growth factor receptor, **MEK** mitogen activated protein kinase, **mTOR** mechanistic target of rapamycin, **PI3K** phosphoinositide 3-kinase, **PRP** platelet rich plasma, **RAS** renin angiotensin system inhibitor, **VEGFR** vascular epithelial growth factor

**AE** adverse event, **BID** twice daily, **5-FU** 5 fluorouracil, **GABA** gamma aminobutyric acid, **HFS** hand and foot syndrome, **NSAIDS** nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, **OTC** over the counter, **q2h** every two hours, **SPF** sun protection factor, **TCI** topical calcineurin inhibitors, **TCS** topical corticosteroids, **TENS** transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, **TID** three times daily, **UV** ultra-violet

<footnote n="1">¹Warning: Check that rash is not a cutaneous toxicity that would necessitate drug interruption, viral infection, or relapse of previous skin condition. Avoid oral steroids for maculopapular rash > grade 3 without a dermatology consultation. ²Can cause photosensitivity. ³In extreme cases, which occur rarely in clinical practice. ⁴With doxorubicin and antimetabolites, may use higher percentage depending on patient response. ⁵When using doxorubicin and taxanes, Bun et al. Support Care Cancer 2018. ⁶When using capecitabine in colorectal patients. ⁷May use higher percentage depending on patient response. ⁸With multikinase inhibitor regorafenib. ⁹Contraindications: hematologic cancers and cancers of head/neck, those receiving platinum-based therapy due to cold sensitivity</footnote>

<footnote>*Sun avoidance can depend on the region and individual patient variables</footnote>
increase stratum corneum hydration (*P* < 0.001) along with decreasing transepidermal water loss (*P* < 0.03) [27]. A small pilot study reported that prophylactic application of a niacinamide-containing emollient reduced the rate of skin toxicities while maintaining good quality of life [28]. Additionally, moisturizing was effective in managing xerosis in a small (*n* = 30) uncontrolled trial of cancer patients [29]. More recently, a systematic review concluded that moisturizer use reduced the occurrence of severe acute radiation dermatitis and there was weak evidence indicating moisturizer use improved quality of life [30]. Patients should also be educated to avoid harsh soaps and basic pH cleansers, limit shower time and avoid hot water, and frequently apply emollients [1, 3]. Ointments may lead to follicular occlusion and folliculitis, so these should be used with caution [3]. However, some patients may need ointments to achieve sufficient relief particularly when present on hands, feet, and very dry areas, or if fissures have occurred [3].

## Maculopapular rash

Maculopapular rash is also associated with a variety of anticancer treatments and may be both more common and more severe with combination therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors with cytotoxic drugs (Table 1) [31]. Maculopapular rashes may appear as early as within the first 2 weeks of anticancer treatment and may be accompanied by non-cutaneous symptoms such as fever [31]. There is evidence to show that Grade 1 rash may be managed with emollients and appropriate skin cleansers [32]. Rash severity may be a surrogate marker of anticancer therapy efficacy, so every effort should be made to manage the patient's symptoms with dermocosmetics and skin care to allow continuation of therapy as long as possible [13].

It is important to verify whether severe rash (grades 3 or higher by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition) is not a cutaneous toxicity that would necessitate drug interruption. In some cases, a topical corticosteroid and antihistamines can be added to allow therapy to continue.

## Folliculitis (formerly known as acneiform rash)

As shown in Table 1, targeted therapies and multikinase inhibitors are associated with a folliculitis which mimics acne (hence the widespread use of the term acneiform rash) [33]. Folliculitis has drawn attention to cancer therapy associated skin toxicities and is common among patients treated with EGFR inhibitors (up to 100%) [4, 33]. This skin toxicity may be associated with favorable response to anticancer therapy, yet folliculitis can impact patient quality of life and can be of sufficient severity to limit anticancer treatment [2, 33, 34]. Folliculitis usually occurs within 2–4 weeks after

initiation of therapy and manifests as erythema, papules, and pustules; unlike acne, folliculitis does not include comonal lesions and may cause itchiness, pain, and spontaneous lesional bleeding [4, 33]. The distribution of lesions is similar to that of acne (face, trunk), but may also include lower trunk, arms/legs, and buttocks (these areas are often a sign of superinfection) [2, 33]. Cyclines at low doses with anti-inflammatory activity should be included in prevention; however, they may be associated with only mild efficacy as treatment [4, 33, 34]. Topical dapsone gel prophylaxis may also have utility [4]. Moisturizers used twice daily are recommended, particularly those with urea 5% to 10%, along with photoprotection [34].

Topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide (BPO), and azelaic acid should be avoided due to potential for burning/irritation, although some authors use BPO at low concentration in the evening [3]. Dermocosmetics with niacinamide can be recommended as proactive/reactive approaches. We believe that it would be helpful to have a study showing efficacy of dermocosmetics as prophylaxis/treatment in this setting. Generally, patients should avoid sun exposure and frequent washing with hot water [34]. Bacterial culture should be considered in the case of suboptimal response, particularly when infection is suspected [2, 34].

## Photosensitivity

Sun exposure and ultraviolet (UV) light can exacerbate skin toxicities, including rash and xerosis [3]. UVA has a major role in this setting, and it is important to educate patients about the need to use broad-spectrum sunscreen with UVA (covering long UVA wavelengths: 330–450 nm) and UVB filters along with good sun protection (clothing, hats, UV films on windows) [1, 35]. In addition, sun exposure can lead to pigmentation changes in dark-skinned patients [3]. If the patient finds sunscreen irritating, sunscreens with physical blocks such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide can be used [1].

## Skin/nail changes

Anticancer treatments can cause nail changes by affecting the rapidly dividing matrix cells of the nail plate [36]. Nail changes are common with cytotoxic therapy, EGFR inhibitors, and radiotherapy (Table 1); they are usually—but not always—transient and resolve with discontinuation of therapy [2, 36]. They often occur after 1–2 months of treatment and can include onycholysis, paronychia, and changes in pigmentation/texture [2]. While some nail changes have primarily a cosmetic aspect, others may cause significant pain [36]. This toxicity has a high psychological impact and can be difficult to treat [36]. Patients should be educated about the potential for nail changes, including a discussion about preventive measures such as minimizing pressure, trauma,

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>
and friction on the nails [36]. Irritants such as frequent or prolonged water exposure, aggressive manicures, nail biting, and artificial nails should be avoided during treatment. Generally, nail toxicities are managed conservatively and do not require drug withdrawal [1]. However, discontinuation may be needed in severe cases [36]. Application of a nail polish to protect the nails as well as liquid bandages have been used to prevent nails from breaking [1, 3].

## Inflammatory hand and foot syndrome

Hand and foot syndrome (HFS) typically presents as an inflammatory condition, but multikinase inhibitors induce a hyperkeratotic HFS which differs from chemotherapy-induced HFS in pathophysiology, symptoms, and treatment options (discussed below) [37]. HFS with cytotoxic therapies is characterized by dysesthesia, erythema, and scaling and often has a symmetrical, diffuse presentation [38]. Patients may also have vesicles and bullae, which can desquamate [2]. Early recognition of HFS is essential, since this toxicity can quickly progress to debilitating stages [3].

Several preventive approaches have been studied—including use of COX inhibitors, pyridoxine, and urea creams [34, 37, 39]. According to a recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies, celecoxib and urea cream were associated with significant risk reduction and/or reduction of severity [37, 39]. Notably, celecoxib reduced risk of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine, urea cream was somewhat less effective in capecitabine-treated patients but showed greater risk reduction in sorafenib-treated patients [37]. Salicylic or urea ointments may also be beneficial [13]. Educate patients at risk to avoid irritants to hands and feet (environmental, chemical, other) [34]. Table 1 presents recommendations from our clinical experience.

## Hyperkeratotic HFS (under multikinase inhibitors)

A high proportion (up to 71%) of patients treated with multikinase inhibitors develop HFS; the incidence varies both with tumor type and the specific multikinase inhibitor [34, 38, 40]. Multikinase inhibitor HFS is sometimes referred to as hand-foot reaction, to distinguish from the HFS associated with conventional agents such as capecitabine [38]. The onset of HFS with multikinase therapy may be more rapid than with cytotoxic therapy: within days to a few weeks compared to weeks/months after treatment initiation [38]. Unlike the clinical presentation of inflammatory HFS, multikinase HFS often manifests with dysesthesia and erythema along with pain, fissures, blisters and hyperkeratosis; erythematous plaques may also develop [2, 38, 41]. It is typically localized to areas of hands and feet that serve as pressure points [38, 41]. In this setting, salicylic acid or urea may be useful, and the higher urea concentrations may be needed:

10% for prevention up to 40% for management of hyperkeratotic HFS [4]. Patients should be educated to avoid irritants to hands and feet (environmental, chemical, mechanical), long walks, and walking with bare feet [1]. Table 1 presents recommendations from our clinical experience.

## Acute radiation dermatitis

Among the side effects of radiotherapy, radiation dermatitis—or radiodermatitis—is among the most common [3, 42]. It can have a range of clinical manifestations from erythema or discomfort to severe confluent moist desquamation [3]. Up to 90% of patients with cancer develop acute skin toxicities during radiation therapy [43, 44]. Skin damage occurs in the area treated with radiation and can be exacerbated by systemic therapies [45]. Use of radiation therapy in combination with systemic therapy can worsen skin reactions, causing severe xerosis, skin thinning, and even necrosis of the upper skin layers [3]. It has been theorized that the makeup of the human microbiome is associated with the severity of radiation dermatitis. Skin microbiome analysis and appropriate management with personal care products to balance the microbiome could be a tool in the future to prevent or decrease the severity of radiodermatitis symptoms.

Acute radiation dermatitis occurs within 1 to 4 weeks of treatment and may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation of anticancer therapy [3, 42]. “Chronic radiation dermatitis” is usually defined as effects occurring after radiation therapy has completed (see below) [42].

Proactive skin care can safely minimize skin reactions and help support epidermal barrier function for patients undergoing radiotherapy [43, 46]. Berger et al. reported that a kit of 5 commercially available skin care products was associated with > 92% good-excellent tolerability of irradiation, and heavy product users had less skin toxicities vs low users [43]. Sun protection is also important, depending on location, since radiation therapy can increase sensitivity to UV light [42]. Topical treatments with hyaluronic acid may be beneficial, and those with niacinamide, panthenol, glycerin, allantoin, or squalene may be soothing [42]. In breast cancer patients, a skincare regimen including thermal water (La Roche-Posay), cleansers, moisturizer, healing balm, and sunscreen was associated with significantly less ($P \le 0.0001$) severe radiation dermatitis vs none or infrequent use of the skincare regimen [47].

Along with recommendations in Table 1, supportive therapy should be utilized as needed [42]. These may include the following: pain management, wound healing, psychological support, cosmetic interventions, special dressings for wounds with alginate, Mepilex® dressing with skin openings in axilla area, Mepitel Film® at beginning of treatment, silver, hydrocolloids, hydrofilm, and photobiomodulation
therapy (LEDs) [42]. If hyperpigmentation occurs, hydroquinone or tretinoin may be considered, but should be initiated no earlier than 2 months after radiation therapy; cocoa butter may be useful in patients with darker skin types. Interruption of anticancer therapy is at the discretion of the oncology team and will depend on the disease type. For head and neck tumors, an attempt should be made to continue therapy until Grade III symptoms occur unless the course of radiotherapy is nearly complete. For some other disease types, short breaks are not overly concerning [48].

## Chronic radiation dermatitis

Chronic radiation dermatitis can present as persistent pigmentary alterations (ranging from mild to severe), atrophy, skin necrosis, and telangiectasias [1]. Moisturizer and sunscreen have utility as preventive options, and thermal water can be used if symptoms occur (Table 1). In chronic radiation dermatitis, pentoxifylline + vitamin E to prevent radiation-induced fibrosis can be both prophylactic and reactively used. This is used mostly in breast cancer and should be prescribed by a clinician. Patients should be educated about their elevated risk for skin cancer in the long term. Supportive therapy for chronic radiation dermatitis includes pain management, wound healing, psychological support, cosmetic interventions, and physiotherapy for fibrosis and sclerosis. Some clinicians have hesitated to use deodorant and shampoo during treatment, but there is no evidence supporting a detrimental effect, and these may be allowed for patients [49].

## Alopecia

Alopecia can occur from chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or hormonal therapy and, depending on the anticancer treatment, may have distinct clinical management strategies. In all cases, use of hats, scarves, and wigs can be helpful, along with psychological support and cosmetic interventions. When accompanying chemotherapy, it is important to check levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D, zinc, and ferritin and correct deficiencies as needed. Targeted therapies that can induce alopecia include multikinase inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, FGF inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors, and CD4 inhibitors. Management of targeted-therapy induced alopecia can be difficult, and scalp cooling can be used in some chemotherapy-induced cases of alopecia but should not be used in association with endocrine therapies. For alopecia associated with hormonal therapy, minoxidil may be prescribed and platelet rich plasma for those who cannot tolerate minoxidil [50, 51]. Finasteride and dutasteride should be avoided in female breast cancer patients [52].

## Hypertrichosis and trichomegaly

Hypertrichosis can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, and it may be difficult to determine whether it is an adverse event related to treatment or syndrome-related. Before treating as an AE of cancer treatment, non-linkage to a paraneoplastic syndrome must be verified. Trichomegaly, manifesting as thickened, elongated, and curled lashes and brows, can occur in patients treated with EGFR inhibitors [2]. This may be managed by eyelash trimming or laser removal [2]. Psychological support and cosmetic interventions may also be useful. Epilation creams with glycolic acid and waxing should be avoided.

## Keratinocytic hyperproliferative tumors under BRAF-I

Approximately 20% of patients treated with BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy will develop secondary skin tumors and other hyperproliferative lesions, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and keratoacanthomas (KA) [4]. However, metastatic spread has not been reported from those secondary cancers, and there is usually no need for dose modification or treatment interruption. Interestingly, concomitant treatment with MEK inhibitors decreases the incidence of skin toxicities compared with a BRAF inhibitor alone by blocking the MAP kinase pathway downstream. As BRAF inhibitors are phototoxic, photoprotection with broad spectrum UVB and UVA protection is recommended [4].

## Discussion

While there is increasing appreciation of the widespread nature of skin toxicities with anticancer treatment, many persons involved in cancer care relegate discussions about dermatologic adverse events to a secondary priority [11, 14]. In addition to often being a visible reminder of cancer, skin toxicities can also cause significant emotional and physical discomfort [1, 11]. Treatment interruptions occur in as many as 50% of cancer treated patients—depending on the type of treatment and the severity of the side effect [1]. In many areas, access to dermatologists can be difficult in a timely fashion [11]. Yet the advances in cancer treatments mean that there will be an expanding population of cancer patients with skin toxicities [14]. Dermatologists have a vital role in working with the cancer care team on how to manage skin toxicities with a goal of optimizing outcomes [1, 11]. Creation of proactive and preemptive strategies to mitigate skin toxicities can be an effective way to minimize the likelihood and severity of skin problems for cancer patients [1, 14]. Daily skin care routines should be used for prevention and treatment. They

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>
should be discussed with the patient, to help them avoid skin-care products that could exacerbate problems. Active cosmetics can be used to manage skin toxicities of different types; these products have good efficacy but better tolerance and may allow use of alternative treatments or dosages. Severity of a skin toxicity should be assessed by checking for lesions affecting 10% or more skin surface area, fever, pain, involvement of the mucosa, and blood abnormalities [14]. A photographic glossary with key features identifying specific skin toxicities may help support prompt and effective management [14].

In addition to the evidence discussed in the introduction about how dermatology involvement can reduce skin toxicities and improve patient outcomes, there are also emerging data about use of dermocosmetics in this setting, as illustrated in the following examples. Prophylactic use of a niacinamide-based emollient maintained quality of life in women being treated for breast cancer (n = 73) [26]. In addition, preemptive skin care reduced the incidence of severe skin toxicities by 50% vs reactive skincare [53]. Luftner et al. studied use of a supportive and barrier-protective skincare regimen (a kit including 12 products) in prevention and treatment of skin toxicities during chemotherapy (n = 147) [54]. Again, skin toxicities were reported more frequently in casual users of the regimen compared to those who used it daily (p = 0.029) [54]. Erythema and desquamation were also more common in those who used skin-care less frequently (p < 0.05) [54]. In addition, a mobile application (app) for daily use of skincare was associated with a trend toward reduced cases of radiation dermatitis above grade 2 [55]. Daily use of an emollient containing an extract of *Aquaphilus dolomiae* reduced xerosis severity and improved quality of life score in an observational study of 319 cancer patients with xerosis [56].

Skin care has an important supportive role for patients with cancer [13]. Skin toxicities are primarily associated with skin barrier dysfunction and dysbiosis, and maintaining good skin barrier function can reduce the occurrence and severity of symptoms [13]. The literature is clear that use of emollients and mild soaps contributes to improved skin physiology and appearance [13]. Non-occlusive emollients are a well-established approach to treat maculopapular skin rash, one of the most common of skin toxicities [13]. Since exposure to sunlight can worsen rashes, photoprotection is a prudent addition, depending on time of year, likelihood of patient exposure, and geographic location [57]. It is important to begin skin care at the initiation of anticancer treatment [13]. Patients should be encouraged to report symptoms throughout therapy, and additional topical or systemic treatments implemented according to existing guidelines [13]. We hope the recommendations in this publication will enhance creation of skin care protocols to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

**Acknowledgements** Editorial support provided by Valerie Sanders, Sanders Medical Writing. The authors acknowledge the partnership of AFSOS and MASCC.

**Author contribution** All authors contributed to writing of the manuscript and approved the content prior to submission.

**Funding** Funding for editorial support was provided by, La Roche-Posay Laboratoire International, a L'Oreal company.

**Data availability** Not applicable.

## Declarations

**Ethical approval** Not applicable.

**Competing interests** Pr. Dreno has served as consultant/speaker/ received honoraria from La Roche Posay, Pierre Fabre, and Galderma; Dr. Khosrotehrani has served as investigator or consultant to La Roche Posay, Novartis, Sanofi, and Eli Lilly; Dr. De Barros Silva has served as investigator or consultant to La Roche Posay, Bio Brazilian Information Oncology, Janssen, and Merck; Dr. Wolf has served as investigator or consultant to La Roche Posay, VisualDx (dba Logical Images), Argentum Medical, and Pfizer; Dr. Kerob is an employee of La Roche-Posay, a L'Oreal company; Dr. Trombetta has nothing to declare; Dr. Atenguena has served as consultant to La Roche Posay and Merck; Ms. Dielenseger has served as consultant to La Roche Posay, Pfizer, Glaxo SmithKline, Astra Zeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundi Pharma, and Servier; Dr. Pan has nothing to declare; Dr. Scotte and Dr Krakowski have no conflicts of interest to declare; Dr. Lacouture has a consultant role with Johnson and Johnson, Novocure, Janssen, Novartis, Deciphera, Kintara, RBC/La Roche Posay, Tmunity, Repare, Kinnate, Trifecta, Genentech, Loxo, Seattle Genetics, Lutris, OnQuality, Roche, Oncoderm, and Apricity. Dr. Lacouture also receives research funding from Lutris, Paxman, Novocure, OQL, Novartis, and AZ and is funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

**Disclaimer** MASCC does not endorse any brand names of therapeutics identified in this document or in any other documents.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

1. Lacouture ME, Choi J, Ho A et al (2021) Us cutaneous oncodermatology management (uscom): a practical algorithm. J Drugs Dermatol 20:3s-s19

2. Deutsch A, Leboeuf NR, Lacouture ME et al (2020) Dermatologic adverse events of systemic anticancer therapies: cytotoxic
chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Am Soc Clin
Oncol Educ Book 40:485–500

3. Bensadoun RJ, Humbert P, Krutman J et al (2013) Daily baseline skin care in the prevention, treatment, and supportive care of skin toxicity in oncology patients: recommendations from a multinational expert panel. Cancer Manag Res 5:401–408

4. Lacouture M, Sibaud V (2018) Toxic side effects of targeted therapies and immunotherapies affecting the skin, oral mucosa, hair, and nails. Am J Clin Dermatol 19:31–39

5. Lee J, Lim J, Park JS et al (2018) The impact of skin problems on the quality of life in patients treated with anticancer agents: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Res Treat 50:1186–1193

6. Behroozian T, Fatima S, Finkelstein S et al (2022) Current quality of life assessment tools may not fully address dermatological adverse events from anti-cancer therapies. Support Care Cancer 30:9681–9685

7. Byun HJ, Lee HJ, Yang JI et al (2012) Daily skin care habits and the risk of skin eruptions and symptoms in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 23:1992–1998

8. Boone SL, Rademaker A, Liu D et al (2007) Impact and management of skin toxicity associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy: survey results. Oncology 72:152–159

9. Lacouture ME (2009) The growing importance of skin toxicity in egfr inhibitor therapy. Oncology (Williston Park) 23(194):6

10. Huang V, Anadkat M (2011) Dermatologic manifestations of cytotoxic therapy. Dermatol Ther 24:401–410

11. Dreno B, Amici JM, Demessant-Flavigny AL et al (2021) The impact of acne, atopic dermatitis, skin toxicities and scars on quality of life and the importance of a holistic treatment approach. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 14:623–632

12. Ceglio W, Rebeis MM, Santana MF et al (2022) Cutaneous adverse events to systemic antineoplastic therapies: a retrospective study in a public oncologic hospital. An Bras Dermatol 97:14–21

13. Dreno B, Bensadoun RJ, Humbert P et al (2013) Algorithm for dermocosmetic use in the management of cutaneous side-effects associated with targeted therapy in oncology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27:1071–1080

14. Girnita A, Lorentzen H, Kauppi S et al (2021) Supplement individual article: skincare for cancer patients in scandinavia. J Drugs Dermatol 20:ss4-s14

15. Arditi C, Eicher M, Colomer-Lahiguera S et al (2022) Patients’ experiences with cancer care in switzerland: results of a multicentre cross-sectional survey. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 31:e13705

16. Daste A, Chakiba C, Domblides C et al (2016) Targeted therapy and elderly people: a review. Eur J Cancer 69:199–215

17. Bang AS, Anadkat MJ, Choi JN et al (2022) Oncodermatology: advancing the science and care of cancer patients and survivors. Am J Clin Dermatol 23:587–589

18. Barrios DM, Phillips GS, Freites-Martinez A et al (2020) Outpatient dermatology consultations for oncology patients with acute dermatologic adverse events impact anticancer therapy interruption: a retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 34:1340–1347

19. Chen ST, Molina GE, Lo JA et al (2020) Dermatology consultation reduces interruption of oncologic management among hospitalized patients with immune-related adverse events: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 82:994–996

20. Araviiskaia E, Dreno B (2016) The role of topical dermocosmetics in acne vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 30:926–935

21. Ren Z, Zhu K, Kang H et al (2015) Randomized controlled trial of the prophylactic effect of urea-based cream on sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 33:894–900

22. Spada F, Harrison IP, Barnes TM et al (2021) A daily regimen of a ceramide-dominant moisturizing cream and cleanser restores the skin permeability barrier in adults with moderate eczema: a randomized trial. Dermatol Ther 34:e14970

23. Clabbers JMK, Boers-Doets CB, Gelderblom H et al (2016) Xerosis and pruritus as major egfri-associated adverse events. Support Care Cancer 24:513–521

24. Galimont-Collen AF, Vos LE, Lavrijsen AP et al (2007) Classification and management of skin, hair, nail and mucosal side-effects of epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) inhibitors. Eur J Cancer 43:845–851

25. Valentine J, Belum VR, Duran J et al (2015) Incidence and risk of xerosis with targeted anticancer therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 72:656–667

26. Wohlrab J, Bangemann N, Kleine-Tebbe A et al (2014) Barrier protective use of skin care to prevent chemotherapy-induced cutaneous symptoms and to maintain quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 6:115–122

27. Fluhr JW, Miteva M, Primavera G et al (2007) Functional assessment of a skin care system in patients on chemotherapy. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 20:253–259

28. Wohlrab J, Luftner D, Johne A, Camara O, Dominik S, Runnebaum I (2011) The advantage of a proactive, barrier-protective, supportive skin care in patients with brest cancer on chemotherapy. Oncology 34:62

29. Roe E, Garcia Muret MP, Marcuello E et al (2006) Description and management of cutaneous side effects during cetuximab or erlotinib treatments: a prospective study of 30 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 55:429–437

30. Sekiguchi K, Sumi M, Saito A et al (2023) The effectiveness of moisturizer on acute radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer 30:2–12

31. Yahiro C, Takai T, Nakatani S et al (2022) Skin rash associated with combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy for cancer: a retrospective single-center case series. J Dermatol 50:357–363

32. Ocvirk J, Cencelj S (2010) Management of cutaneous side-effects of cetuximab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24:453–459

33. Bierbrier R, Lam M, Pehr K (2022) A systematic review of oral retinoids for treatment of acneiform eruptions induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Dermatol Ther 35:e15412

34. Lacouture ME, Sibaud V, Gerber PA et al (2021) Prevention and management of dermatological toxicities related to anticancer agents: Esmo clinical practice guidelines(☆). Ann Oncol 32:157–170

35. Dummer R, Rinderknecht J, Goldinger SM (2012) Ultraviolet a and photosensitivity during vemurafenib therapy. N Engl J Med 366:480–481

36. Mittal S, Khunger N, Kataria SP (2022) Nail changes with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies. Indian Dermatol Online J 13:13–22

37. Pandy JGP, Franco PIG, Li RK (2022) Prophylactic strategies for hand-foot syndrome/skin reaction associated with systemic cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer 30:8655–8666

38. McLellan B, Ciardiello F, Lacouture ME et al (2015) Regorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reaction: practical advice on diagnosis, prevention, and management. Ann Oncol 26:2017–2026

39. Lan TC, Tsou PH, Tam KW et al (2022) Effect of urea cream on hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs 45:378–386

40. Lee WJ, Lee JL, Chang SE et al (2009) Cutaneous adverse effects in patients treated with the multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib. Br J Dermatol 161:1045–1051
41. Lacouture ME, Sibaud V, Anadkat MJ et al (2021) Dermatologic adverse events associated with selective fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors: overview, prevention, and management guidelines. *Oncologist* 26:e316–e326

42. Hijal T, Sauder MB, Andriessen A, Claveau J, Lynde CW (2021) Canadian skin management in oncology group (casmo) algorithm for the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis. *Skin Ther Lett.* 1–3

43. Berger A, Regueiro C, Hijal T et al (2018) Interest of supportive and barrier protective skin care products in the daily prevention and treatment of cutaneous toxicity during radiotherapy for breast cancer. *Breast Cancer (Auckl)* 12:1178223417752772

44. Wolf JR HA (2023) Radiation dermatitis. Up to Date Wolters Kluwer

45. Leventhal J, Young MR (2017) Radiation dermatitis: recognition, prevention, and management. *Oncology (Williston Park)* 31(885–7):94–99

46. Bolderston A, Lloyd NS, Wong RK et al (2006) The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline. *Support Care Cancer* 14:802–817

47. Sauder M, Addona M, Andriessen A et al (2020) The role of skin care in oncology patients. *Skin Therapy Lett Oct (Suppl):*1–12

48. Trombetta M, Julian TB, Valakh V et al (2010) Reduction in radiation-induced morbidity by use of an intercurrent boost in the management of early-stage breast cancer. *Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys* 77:1303–1308

49. Hardefeldt PJ, Edirimanne S, Eslick GD (2012) Deodorant use and the risk of skin toxicity in patients undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. *Radiother Oncol* 105:378–379

50. Kuo AM-SRR, Ketosugbo K et al (2022) Oral minoxidil for the treatment of late alopecia in cancer survivors. *J Clin Oncol* 40:12022

51. Teng HC, Chen HH (2023) Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of alopecia areata after covid-19 vaccination. *Clin Case Rep* 11:e7342

52. Iamsumang W, Leerunyakul K, Suchonwanit P (2020) Finasteride and its potential for the treatment of female pattern hair loss: evidence to date. *Drug Des Devel Ther* 14:951–959

53. Lacouture ME, Mitchell EP, Piperdi B et al (2010) Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (stepp), a phase ii, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-emptive skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. *J Clin Oncol* 28:1351–1357

54. Luftner D, Dell'Acqua V, Selle F et al (2018) Evaluation of supportive and barrier-protective skin care products in the daily prevention and treatment of cutaneous toxicity during systemic chemotherapy. *Onco Targets Ther* 11:5865–5872

55. Rades D, Zwaan I, Cacicedo J et al (2022) Impact of a mobile application (reminder app) on acute toxicity during radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer - results of a randomized phase iii trial (rarest-02). *BMC Cancer* 22:989

56. Vendrely V, Mayor-Ibarguren A, Stennevin A et al (2022) An emollient plus balm is useful for the management of xerosis in patients treated for cancer: a real-world, prospective, observational, multicenter study. *Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)* 12:683–699

57. Luu M, Lai SE, Patel J et al (2007) Photosensitive rash due to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib. *Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed* 23:42–45

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Authors and Affiliations

Brigitte Dreno¹ · Kiarash Khosrotehrani² · Giselle De Barros Silva³ · Julie Ryan Wolf⁴ · Delphine Kerob⁵ ·

Mark Trombetta⁶ · Etienne Atenguena⁷ · Pascale Dielenseger⁸,⁹,¹⁰ · Meng Pan¹¹ · Florian Scotte¹²,¹³ ·

Ivan Krakowski¹⁴,¹⁵ · Mario Lacouture¹⁶

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

Delphine Kerob
delphine.kerob@loreal.com

1 Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in Immunotherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001. F-44000, Nantes, France

2 Experimental Dermatology Group, University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Australia

3 Department of Oncology, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paulo, Brazil

4 Departments of Dermatology and Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA

5 La Roche Posay International, Levallois, France

6 Department of the Radiologic Sciences, Allegheny Health Network, Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

7 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé Hospital General, Yaoundé, Cameroon

8 Research and Education for Paramedic Professionals Nursing Coordinator, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

9 École Des Sciences du Cancer, Université Paris Sud (XI), Paris, France

10 Association Française Des Infirmières de Cancerologie (AFIC), Paris, France

11 Department of Dermatology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

12 Interdisciplinary Patient Pathway Division, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

13 Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), Aurora, Canada

14 Medical Oncologist, Bordeaux, France

15 Association Francophone Des Soins Oncologiques de Support (AFSOS), Bègles, France

16 Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA