# Impact of the Syn / Anti Relative Configuration of Cryptophane-222 on the Binding Affinity of Cesium and Thallium

Thierry Brotin, Patrick Berthault, Kévin Chighine, Erwann Jeanneau

► To cite this version:

Thierry Brotin, Patrick Berthault, Kévin Chighine, Erwann Jeanneau. Impact of the Syn / Anti Relative Configuration of Cryptophane-222 on the Binding Affinity of Cesium and Thallium. ACS Omega, 2022, 7 (51), pp.48361-48371. 10.1021/acsomega.2c06570. hal-04194498

HAL Id: hal-04194498

https://hal.science/hal-04194498v1

Submitted on 3 Sep 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# Impact of the syn/anti relative configuration of cryptophane-222 on the binding affinity of cesium and thallium

Thierry Brotin*, †, Patrick Berthault‡, Kévin Chighine‡, Erwann Jeanneau§

† ENSL, CNRS, Laboratoire de Chimie UMR 5182, 46 Allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon France

‡ Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Nanosciences et Innovation pour les Matériaux, la Biomédecine et l'Energie, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

§ Centre de Diffractométrie Henri Longchambon Université de Lyon 1, 5 rue la Doua 69100 Villeurbanne, France.

**ABSTRACT:** We report in this article the synthesis, the X-ray crystal structure of compound syn-2 and its binding properties with cesium and thallium in aqueous solution under basic conditions. Compound syn-2 is the diastereomeric compound of anti-1 that shows very high affinity for cesium and thallium in aqueous solution in the same conditions. Despite the close structural similarities that exists between the syn-2 and anti-1 compounds, they show large discrepancy in their ability to bind cesium and thallium cations in the same conditions. Indeed, the syn-2 derivative has a lower affinity for these two cationic species and the binding constants are measured to be several orders of magnitude lower than those found for its congener. The large differences in affinity observed with these two compounds can be explained by the relative position of the six hydroxyl groups to each other.

## Introduction

The development of human activities all over the world has strongly modified our planet and the ecosystems in many ways. For instance, it significantly contributed to the pollution of groundwater, soil and air by toxic substances such as metallic species. Of the
various metals involved, thallium has not received as much publicity as mercury and lead,
although its toxicity to human health is considered higher.¹ However, nowadays, the danger
caused by thallium pollution is well recognized by governmental agencies in different
countries and the elimination of this metallic species from groundwater and soil has become a
top priority.²

Several options have been proposed to recover thallium salts, mainly thallium (I),
dispersed in the environment. For instance, mineral matrices seem to be interesting materials
to extract thallium from groundwater.³ These materials are easier to prepare than organic
compounds and they can be produced in larger quantities more easily. On the other hand, non-
natural compounds, mainly macrocyclic compounds, with a high affinity for thallium salts
have been specifically developed for this purpose.⁴ Interestingly, the physical properties of
these molecular hosts can be tuned more easily in order to maximize interactions with the
cations of interest.

On the other hand, the ¹³³Cs cation is not as toxic as thallium, but the radioactive
isotopes of cesium (mainly ¹³⁷Cs) can represent a significant environmental problem as
observed during the Fukushima (2011) and Chernobyl (1986) nuclear accidents. When
released in the atmosphere, this species can spread over great distances and contaminate large
areas for a long period of time. Many methods to recover ¹³⁷Cs and decontaminate soils and
groundwater have been proposed. For example, different sorbents such as clays, zeolites, and
organic compounds including macrocyclic derivatives have been developed for this
purpose.⁵,⁶

Covalently bound molecular capsules, called *cryptophanes*, decorated with phenol
functions exhibit very high affinity for cesium and thallium cations in aqueous solution under
basic conditions.⁷ For instance, cryptophane *anti-1* bearing six phenol functions shows high
binding properties for alkali cations ($Rb^+, Cs^+$) and $Tl^+$ in $LiOH/H_2O$ or $NaOH/H_2O$ (chart 1).
These complexes have been thoroughly studied by different techniques such as $^{133}Cs$ and $^{205}Tl$
NMR spectroscopy, Electronic and Vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy or Isothermal
Titration Calorimetry (ITC) experiments.

All the cryptophanes studied so far for cesium and thallium complexation possess the
relative configuration *anti*. This means that the linkers connecting the two cyclotribenzylene
units adopt a helical arrangement. Consequently, the two cyclotribenzylene (CTB) units are
tilted from each other and these structures possess an inherent chirality regardless of the
nature of the substituents grafted on the six benzene rings. This particular arrangement of the
linkers allows the cryptophane to adopt a higher flexibility and to maximize interactions with
the encapsulated species.⁸ On the other hand, cryptophanes with a small cavity ($V_{vdw} < 100$
Å³) and the *syn* configuration have been little described and only a few examples have been
reported in the literature.⁹ Recently, a new synthetic approach has allowed us to extend the
synthesis to cryptophanes with the *syn* configuration. For example, *syn*-cryptophane-B, the
diastereomer of *anti*-cryptophane-A, was prepared in this way (see Chart 1).¹⁰

Interestingly, the synthetic strategy developed for syn-cryptophane-B can also be used
to prepare the new syn-2 derivative (Scheme 1), which is nothing but the diastereomer of anti-
1 (see Chart 1). At first glance, considering that cesium and thallium cations do not interact
with the alkyl chains and that the cavities of anti-1 and syn-2 possess similar volumes, it
seems reasonable to assume that compound syn-2 will behave like compound anti-1 in the
presence of these two cationic species. Thus, high binding constants for the Cs⁺@syn-2 and
Tl⁺@syn-2 complexes are also expected with this compound as observed with the anti-1
derivative.

In this work, we report the binding properties of both the $Cs^+@syn-2$ and $Tl^+@syn-2$
complexes by means of NMR spectroscopy and isothermal titration experiments (ITC). These
conditions are identical as those reported in a previous article for the study of the Cs⁺@anti-1
and Tl⁺@anti-1 complexes. Finally, we compare the results obtained with these two
compounds to evaluate the impact of the spatial arrangement of the three O-CH₂-CH₂-O
linkers on the molecular recognition properties of this new host.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>Chart 1: chemical structure of compound *anti*-cryptophane-A, *syn*-cryptophane-B, cryptophanes *anti*-1 and *syn*-2.</figcaption></figure>

RESULTS

**Synthesis:** Hexa-phenol 2 was prepared in a single step from the known derivative *syn*-3, the latter being prepared in 8 steps from the commercially available 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde.¹⁰

A hydrogenation step in presence of a catalytic amount of palladium on charcoal in a
CH₂Cl₂/MeOH mixture (50/50: v/v) provides rapidly the desired *syn-2* derivative. Extraction
with a NaOH (0.5 M)/H₂O solution followed by acidification at 0°C with few drops of a
concentrated HCl solution gives rise to compound *syn-2* with 83 % yield. This compound can
be recrystallized from a hot acetone solution. Compound *syn-2* was fully characterized by ¹H,
¹³C NMR spectroscopy and HRMS. The ¹H NMR spectrum (3.0 - 9.0 ppm; DMSO-d₆) of 2 is shown Figure 1 and compared to the known hexa-phenol derivative *anti*-1. The two spectra look very similar, with the exception of the diastereotopic protons of compound *syn*-2 which appear as two sets of signals instead of one for its congener. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of compound *syn*-2 are reported Figures S1-S2.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Scheme 1: synthesis of compound *syn*-2 from the tris-phenol derivative *syn*-3</figcaption></figure>

**Experimental procedure:** compound *syn*-3 (0.38 g, 0.35 mmol) prepared according to a known procedure was introduced in a 50 mL round bottom flask and dissolved in a mixture of CH₂Cl₂ (12 mL) and MeOH (12 mL) at room temperature.¹⁰ Then, a catalytic amount of Pd/C (10%) was introduced into the flask. The balloon was closed with a septum. Then, Hydrogen gas was bubbled into the flask for several minutes and the reaction was kept for 16 h at room temperature under a hydrogen atmosphere. The mixture was filtered over celite and the solid washed 4 times with CH₂Cl₂ then with a few mL of DMSO. The solution was poured into a separating funnel and the product was extracted twice with a NaOH (0.5 M)/H₂O solution. The aqueous solution was finally washed 4 times with CH₂Cl₂ and then cooled down at 0°C. Acidification with few drops of a concentrated HCl solution gives rise to a white precipitate, which was collected on a frit. The solid was washed with water, dried and finally washed with diethyl ether to give compound *syn*-2 as a white powder (0.24 g, 85 %). Compound *syn*-2 crystallized in acetone. Mp: 84°C. UV-Vis (LiOH-0.1M): λmax (log ε) 340 (4.5 shoulder), 300 (4.27). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d₆, 25 °C): δ 8.20 (s, 6H, broad), 6.74 (s, 6H), 6.66 (s,
6H), 4.44 (d, *J* = 13.2 Hz), 3.35 (m, 12 H, broad), 3.21 (d, *J* = 13.2 Hz). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (MHz, CDCl₃, 25 °C): δ 146.1 (6C), 143.7 (6C), 134.1 (6C), 130.2 (6C), 119.1 (6C), 117.2 (6C), 67.8 (6C), 35.1 (6C). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+Na]⁺ Calcd for C₄₈H₄₂NaO₁₂; 833,2577 Found 833,2568.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1: ¹H NMR spectra of compounds *anti*-1 and *syn*-2 recorded in DMSO-d₆ at 298 K. Full spectrum of *syn*-2 (0-10 ppm) is reported in Figure S1.</figcaption></figure>

Despite their structural similitude compound *anti*-1 and *syn*-2 show significant
differences in their physical properties. For instance, compared to compound *anti*-1, the new
derivative *syn*-2 appears to be only soluble in LiOH/H₂O or NaOH/H₂O solution at a
concentration around 0.1 M. At higher concentration compound *syn*-2 precipitates and at
lower LiOH concentration it gives rises to nano-aggregates as evidenced by Diffusion Light
Scattering (DLS). For instance, compound *syn*-2 dissolved at a concentration of c = 3 × 10⁻⁵ M
in LiOH/H₂O (10⁻³ M) gives rise to small aggregates whose size is estimated to be 90 nm
(Figure S3). This contrasts with compound *anti*-1 that shows better solubility in these
conditions. Thus, all the binding experiments reported with *syn*-2 in this article will be
performed at a LiOH/H₂O and NaOH/H₂O concentration close to 0.1 M.
**¹³³Cs NMR Spectroscopy.** The ability of compound *syn*-2 to encapsulate cesium in water under basic conditions was assessed by ¹³³Cs NMR Spectroscopy. *Syn*-2 was dissolved in a 0.1 M NaOD aqueous solution in the presence of an excess of CsNO₃ (Figure 2) and ¹³³Cs NMR spectra were recorded as a function of the temperature (275-340 K). At 290 K, the ¹³³Cs NMR spectrum reveals a broad signal at *δ* = -10 ppm, which has been identified as Cs⁺ dissolved in the bulk. We also distinguish another NMR signal located at *δ* = -130 ppm. Decreasing the temperature up to 275 K allows us to distinguish more easily the second ¹³³Cs NMR signal and to assign this resonance signal to the spectral signature of the Cs⁺@*syn*-2 complex. At 275 K, the Cs⁺@*syn*-2 complex resonates at higher frequency than the NMR signal observed for the *anti*-1 congener (*δ* = -270 ppm). Increasing the temperature decreases the chemical shift splitting between free and bound cesium signals and at 310 K they coalesce to give a single resonance signal located at *δ* = -55 ppm. Thanks to the Eyring relationship (Figure S3), this allows us to calculate an exchange constant *k*<sub>Tc</sub> ≈ 1.8 × 10⁴ s⁻¹ and an activation barrier of Δ*G*# = 12.1 kcal.mol⁻¹ at this temperature.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 2: <sup>133</sup>Cs NMR spectra of *syn*-2 dissolved in NaOD (0.1 M)/D<sub>2</sub>O in the presence of an excess of CsNO<sub>3</sub>. Spectra recorded as a function of temperature (275-340 K).</figcaption></figure>

**UV-visible Spectra:** Spectroscopic tools such as UV-visible and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectroscopy have been very useful to study compound *syn*-1 and its congeners upon binding with cationic species. However, in contrast to the *anti*-1 derivative, the achiral structure (C<sub>3</sub>h symmetry) of this *syn*-2 prevents us to use of ECD spectroscopy to characterize this compound and its complexes. Nevertheless, cryptophanes are made of six benzene chromophore that absorb light below 350 nm, which makes possible to record their UV-visible spectrum under different conditions. Thus, it is possible to detect the symmetry-forbidden <sup>1</sup>L<sub>b</sub> transition of the six benzene rings of cryptophanes that appears near 300 nm. The symmetry-forbidden <sup>1</sup>L<sub>a</sub> transition of the benzene chromophore, which is located at lower wavelengths is also accessible but more difficult to detect because it is buried below the
strong symmetry-allowed $^1B_b$ transition. The UV-visible spectrum of *syn-2* in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O is reported in Figure S4. This spectrum is very similar to that observed for its congener in the same conditions. For instance, the UV-visible spectrum shows a transition with a maximum at 305 nm that corresponds to the $^1L_b$ transitions. A shoulder is also observed at lower wavelengths and corresponds to the $^1L_a$ transitions of the benzene rings. Upon addition of Cs⁺ to the solution the UV-visible spectrum of *syn-2* is modified and a slight bathochromic shift of the spectrum is observed. This effect is more pronounced when Cs⁺ is replaced by the Tl⁺ cation as this was previously observed with its *anti-1* congener. Thus, the UV-visible spectra in the presence of these two cations allows us to ascertain that encapsulation of Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ takes place under these conditions. However, a quantitative description of this phenomenon seems difficult to achieve with this technique and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) experiments are more appropriate to measure the association constants in this case.

**X-ray structures of compounds 1-3:** X-ray quality single crystals have been obtained for compounds **1-3** in different solvents. Small colorless plate crystals of compound *anti-1* suitable for X-ray analysis have been obtained from slow evaporation of a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃CN mixture. Compound *anti-1* crystallizes in a monoclinic crystal system and in *P2₁/c* space group (Table S1). The unit cell contains four molecules and each cavity of the host molecules are filled with an acetonitrile molecule. From the ORTEP structure it can be seen that the three O-CH₂-CH₂-O linkers adopt dihedral angles 71.7°, -67.8° and 62.2° that are close to that observed for a *gauche* (g) conformation (Figure 3, Figure S5 and Table S2). This conformation results in a flattened structure of the *anti-1* compound where the two CTB caps are staggered with respect to each other. The volume of the internal cavity has been calculated to be 73 Å³ for this conformation and the intermolecular cavity has been estimated to be 92 Å³
(Table S3). It is noteworthy that compound *anti*-1 also showed residual intermolecular electronic density that could not be modelled by a solvent molecule. The contribution of this disordered solvent to the structure factors was taken into account with the SQUEEZE algorithm.¹¹

We successfully obtained X-ray quality crystals of compound *syn*-2 in two different solvents (acetone and acetonitrile). For instance, slow evaporation of an acetone solution provides colorless plate-shaped single crystals of *syn*-2 suitable for X-ray analysis. In this solvent, compound *syn*-2 crystallizes in an orthorhombic crystal system and in *Pbca* space group (Table S1). The unit cell contains 8 molecules of *syn*-2 and the cavity of the host are filled with an acetone molecule. The interstitial space between molecules has been estimated to be 298 Å³ and is filled with acetone and water molecules (Table S3). As observed for compound *anti*-1, The conformation of the three O-CH₂-CH₂-O linkers is close to that observed for a gauche conformation and dihedral angles of -56.3°, 48.3 and 62.6° have been measured from the ORTEP structure (Figure 3, Figure S6 and Table S2). This results in a measured internal cavity V = 93 Å³ for *syn*-2, a value 25% higher than that calculated for the *anti*-1 compound (Table S3). In pure acetonitrile compound *syn*-2 also gives rise to single colorless plate crystals suitable for X-ray analysis. In this solvent, this compound crystallizes in a monoclinic crystal system and in P2₁/c space group with four molecules per unit cell (Table S1). Both the cavities of the host molecules and the interstitial spaces are filled with acetonitrile molecules. From the ORTEP representation the internal cavity of the host and the intermolecular voids have been estimated to be V = 91 Å³ and V = 180 Å³, respectively (Table S3). This representation (Figure S7) allows us to measure three dihedral angles 51.9°, 62.6°, and -54.2° for the three O-CH₂-CH₂-O linkers resulting to angle values very close to those determined previously for the same compound (Table S2). It can be noticed that if we exclude
the nature of the guest molecule present in the cavity of syn-2, the two structures of compound syn-2 in acetone and acetonitrile look very similar.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Figure 3: ORTEP representation of compound CH₃CN@anti-1 (top view) and acetone@syn-2 (bottom view). Two spatial representations are given for each structure. Hydrogen atoms have been removed for clarity. The displacement ellipsoids were plotted at 30% probability level.

Finally, single crystals of the intermediate syn-3 suitable for X-ray analysis have been obtained by slow evaporation of a CH₂Cl₂/EtOH solution. Interestingly, in this example we observed that spontaneous resolution takes place. Compound syn-3 crystallizes in an orthorhombic crystal system and in a *Pca2*₁ space group (Table S1). Near zero values of the Flack (0.05) and Hooft (0.063) parameters indicates that a single enantiomer is present into the crystal lattice. In our example, the ORTEP representation (Figure 4, Figure S8) represents the syn-3 derivative with the *MP* absolute configuration, the first letter corresponding to the stereodescriptor of the CTB unit decorated with the OH group. Four molecules are present
per unit cell and the internal cavity of the host molecule (V = 95 Å³) is filled with a CH₂Cl₂ solvent molecule (Table S3). Large intermolecular voids (V = 305 Å³) calculated from the ORTEP representation are filled with CH₂Cl₂ molecules. As observed with the previous X-ray structures of compounds *anti-1* and *syn-2*, the three linkers of *syn-3* adopt conformation angles -53.4°, 51.0° and 56.8° close to that observed for a gauche (g) conformation (Table S2).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

Figure 4: ORTEP representation of compound CH₂Cl₂@MP-*syn-3*. The first stereodescriptor refers to CTB decorated with the three methoxy groups. The two spatial representations are given for each structure. Hydrogen atoms have been removed for clarity. The displacements ellipsoids were plotted at 30% probability level. In all these structures the ORTEP representation reveals the presence of intra and inter-molecular hydrogen bonding, which have been listed in Tables S4-S5.

**ITC experiments.** Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) is a very efficient method to characterize host-guest interactions in different conditions. This method gives access, in a single experiment, to the stoichiometry of the complex, the binding constant and the enthalpy of complexation ΔH⁰. Thus, the entropy of complexation ΔS⁰ and the free energy of complexation ΔG⁰ can be easily deduced from these parameters thereby giving a complete map of the binding process. For instance, titration experiments have been used with success in the case of cryptophane *anti-1* and its congeners in the presence of alkali cations and thallium(I) under different conditions.⁵b
In order to compare the binding properties of compound *anti*-1 with compound *syn*-2, a series of ITC experiments were first undertaken with *syn*-2 in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O in the presence of rubidium chloride (RbCl), cesium hydroxide (CsOH) and thallium acetate (TlOAc). The experimental conditions used to study compound *syn*-2 are similar to those used previously for the *anti*-1 derivative. Contrary to compound *anti*-1 that shows good recognition properties for Rb⁺, the titration experiments of *syn*-2 in the presence of Rb⁺ in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O reveal that this compound does not show any affinity for this cation (Figure S9). In the same solvent, compound *syn*-2 shows a moderate affinity for the Cs⁺ cation and an association constant K = 1.3×10⁴ M⁻¹ has been measured from the titration experiment (Figure S10). This value appears to be lower by five orders of magnitude to that observed for the Cs⁺@*anti*-1 complex in the same conditions.⁷b In the presence of Tl⁺ the situation appears to be different. Indeed, the *syn*-2 compound shows an enthalpogram that presents the classical S-shape (Figure S11), thus suggesting a strong interaction between *syn*-2 and this cation. Nevertheless, we failed to fit these experimental points regardless of the fitting model chosen. This difficulty in fitting the experimental data point arises from the fact that the enthalpy of dilution of the Tl⁺ cation in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O is lower from the enthalpy of dilution of the Tl⁺ cation in the presence of *syn*-2. Thus, the subtraction of these two enthalpograms results in a small negative enthalpic term that still remains once the cage is fully saturated. Two independent ITC experiments performed under the same conditions give similar results (Figure S11). It is noteworthy that ignoring this small contribution (data points set to zero), leads to a curve that fits perfectly the experimental data to give a binding constant K = 6.9×10⁵ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -8000 cal.mol⁻¹) for the Tl⁺@*syn*-2 (Figure 5). As observed in the case of the Cs⁺@*syn*-2 complex, the binding constant observed in this case is five orders of magnitude lower than the one observed in the same conditions for the Tl⁺@*anti*-1 complex.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

Figure 5: (left) Isothermal Calorimetric Titration data (forward titration) of compound syn-2 in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O at 298 K. The host solution (c = 0.993 mmol) was placed into the calorimeter cell (1.4 mL) and 28 successive aliquots (10 µL) of TlOAc (c = 0.099 mmol) were added at 3 min intervals (n = 0.8; K = 6.9×10⁵ M⁻¹; ΔH⁰ = -8500 cal.mol⁻¹; ΔS⁰ = -1.9 cal.mol⁻¹.K⁻¹; ΔG⁰ = -7950 cal.mol⁻¹). (right) Isothermal Calorimetric Titration data (reverse titration) of compound syn-2 recorded in the same conditions. TlOAc (c = 0.10 mmol) was placed into the calorimeter cell and 28 successive aliquots (10 µL) of syn-2 (c = 1.02 mmol) were added at 3 min intervals (n = 1.2; K = 3.25×10⁵ M⁻¹; ΔH⁰ = -8100 cal.mol⁻¹; ΔS⁰ = -2.0 cal.mol⁻¹.K⁻¹; ΔG⁰ = -7500 cal.mol⁻¹).

Although this procedure has a small impact on the measured binding constant, it remains questionable. Indeed, this small contribution may reflect additional interactions between the Tl⁺ cation and *syn*-2. In such a case, it is recommended to perform the reverse titration, which requires to introduce the ligand (Tl⁺) in the cell and the host molecule (*syn*-2) in the syringe.¹² In the case of a classic 1:1 complex such as the one encountered here, we expect the forward and reverse isothermal titrations experiment to be identical. In contrast, a difference between them may reveal a more complex host-guest binding process or additional interactions such as aggregation. It is interesting to note that this procedure was not used with
the *anti*-1 host because in all previously reported examples, the experimental ITC data were
fully consistent with a 1:1 complex, regardless of the nature of the cation. However, for
comparison, we decided to report in this article the reverse titration of *anti*-1 with the Rb+, Cs+
and Tl+ performed in the same conditions. A comparison of the reverse titration between these
two host molecules seems interesting and can provide additional information about their
behavior in the presence of these cationic species.

The reverse titration performed with syn-2 in the presence of Cs+ shows an experimental ITC
curve that fits well with a one-site model. From this experiment a moderate binding constant
K = 7.4×10³ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -5300 cal.mol⁻¹) was measured, a value close to that measured for the
forward titration (Figure S10). In contrast, replacing Cs+ by Tl+ leads to a titration curve more
difficult to interpret since the theoretical curve does not fit perfectly well the experimental
data (Figure 5). Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the binding constant K = 3.3×10⁵
M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -7500 cal.mol⁻¹) extracted from this experiment is in good agreement with the
binding constant measured for the forward titration.

On the other hand, the forward and reverse titrations of compound *anti*-1 were found
identical regardless the nature of the cation. Thus, the forward and reverse titrations of the
Rb⁺@*anti*-1, the Cs⁺@*anti*-1 and the Tl⁺@*anti*-1 complexes fit perfectly with a 1:1 complex
(Figure S12-S14). For instance, the reverse titration gives a binding constant K = 7.3×10⁵ M⁻¹
(ΔG⁰ = -8000 cal.mol⁻¹) for the Rb⁺@*anti*-1 complex whereas an association constant K =
9.2×10⁵ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -8200 cal.mol⁻¹) was previously determined for the forward titration.⁵b
Similarly, an association constant K = 8.9×10⁸ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -12200 cal.mol⁻¹) was measured
for the Cs⁺@*anti*-1 complex instead of K = 2.7×10⁹ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -12900 cal.mol⁻¹) for the
reverse reaction. Finally, a binding constant K = 6.7×10¹⁰ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -14800 cal.mol⁻¹) was
measured for the reverse titration of the Tl⁺@*anti*-1 complex a value close to that measured
for the forward titration.⁷b Note that in the latter case, the presence of a competitor (Rb⁺) was
mandatory to accurately measure the association with Tl⁺. All together, these results show that compound *syn*-2 seems to behave differently from compound *anti*-1 towards cationic species and upon complexation with thallium gives enthalpograms more complex to interpret.

It is important to point out that the titration experiments described above are not performed at constant pH. Indeed, small injection of ligand during the forward and reverse titration experiments slightly modifies the pH of the solution. Thus, a possible change in the pH of the solution may affect the isothermal titration of the *syn*-2 compound compared to its congener *anti*-1. To test this hypothesis, a new series of experiments were performed in a NaOH/KCl buffer to maintain the pH of the solution around pH = 13. For comparison, the titration experiments (forward and reverse) of *anti*-1 were also performed in the same conditions.

The forward titration of *syn*-2 shows exothermic heat release upon injection of small amount of Cs⁺ cation in the NaOH/KCl buffer. Using these conditions, a one-site model fits perfectly the data points and allows an estimation of the binding constant K = 4.1×10³ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -4900 cal.mol⁻¹) (Figure S15). The reverse titration also results in an enthalpogram that fits well with a one-site model and a binding constant K = 2.2×10³ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -4600 cal.mol⁻¹) was extracted from this experiment. A change in the nature of the cation leads to a more complex situation since the addition of Tl⁺ to a buffer solution of *syn*-2 leads to a titration whose data points can only be correctly fitted with two sequential binding sites. Thus, this leads to the determination of two binding constants with different magnitude K₁ = 1.1×10⁵ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -6900 cal.mol⁻¹) and K₂ = 1.8×10³ M⁻¹ (ΔG⁰ = -4400 cal.mol⁻¹) (Figure 6). In contrast, the data point fits well with a one-site model for the reverse titration and give a binding constant K = 6.8×10⁴ M⁻¹. We can point out that the first binding constant is consistent with the data measured in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O for the forward and reverse experiments.
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

Figure 6: (left) Isothermal Calorimetric Titration data (forward titration) of compound syn-2 in NaOH/H₂O-KCl buffer (pH = 12.9) at 298 K. The host solution (c = 0.099 mmol) was placed into the calorimeter cell (1.4 mL) and 28 successive aliquots (10 µL) of TlOAc (c = 3.02 mmol) were added at 3 min intervals (sequential binding site: K₁ = 1.1×10⁵ M⁻¹; ΔH₁⁰ = -6100 cal.mol⁻¹; ΔS₁⁰ = 2.6 cal.mol⁻¹·K⁻¹; ΔG₁⁰ = -6900 cal.mol⁻¹; K₂ = 1.8×10³ M⁻¹; ΔH₂⁰ = -15200 cal.mol⁻¹; ΔS₂⁰ = -36.1 cal.mol⁻¹·K⁻¹; ΔG₂⁰ = -1100 cal.mol⁻¹). (right) Isothermal Calorimetric Titration data (reverse titration) of compound syn-2 recorded in the same conditions. TlOAc (c = 0.1 mmol) was placed into the calorimeter cell and 28 successive aliquots (10 µL) of syn-2 (c = 0.986 mmol) were added at 3 min intervals (n = 0.8; K = 6.8×10⁴ M⁻¹; ΔH⁰ = -8900 cal.mol⁻¹; ΔS⁰ = -7.8 cal.mol⁻¹·K⁻¹; ΔG⁰ = -6600 cal.mol⁻¹).

In the same conditions, the forward and reverse titrations have been performed with host *anti-1* and the ligands Rb⁺, Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ (Figure S16-S18). In all cases, we noticed that the experimental points fit very well with a 1:1 complex. In addition, both the forward and reverse titrations give similar results. It should be noticed that in these conditions the binding constants deduced from these experiments are smaller than those previously reported in pure NaOH (0.1 M)/H₂O.⁵b These are because the buffer contains potassium cations present in large excess. Indeed, K⁺ shows a moderate affinity (K = 500 – 1000 M⁻¹) for the host *anti-1* and
acts as a competitor, thus resulting in lower affinity for the Rb⁺@anti-1, Cs⁺@anti-1 and
Tl⁺@anti-1 complexes (Figure S19) in this solvent.

DISCUSSION

The intermediate syn-3 appears to be a useful derivative to prepare a wide range of C3-
symmetric derivatives with the syn-configuration, thanks to the presence of three unprotected
phenol groups and three other protected phenol functions that allow us to easily modify its
structure. For example, recent studies have suggested that cryptophanes with the syn
configuration possess superior characteristics for the design of ¹²⁹Xe NMR-based biosensors
compared to their anti-congeners. ¹³Therefore, the interest for the syn-compounds should
rapidly grow in the future. Interestingly, compound syn-3 allows us to give access to the syn-2
derivative in good yield and in a single step. In our case, this approach was preferred to the
demethylation step of syn-cryptophane-B with PPh2Li in THF. Indeed, although this
procedure has been successfully used to prepare the anti-1 derivative, the purification step for
the syn-2 compound would be more difficult with this approach. For instance, the presence of
the large excess of PPh2Li present in the reaction mixture and the lower solubility of the syn-2
compound would make its purification process more difficult. In addition, syn-cryptophane-B
also requires the synthesis of the syn-3 derivative to be prepared. Thus, a direct synthesis of
syn-2 from compound syn-3 is fully justified in our case. It is worth mentioning that, if
necessary, compound anti-1 can also be prepared by this way. Indeed, both anti-3 and syn-3
diastereomers are produced at the same time during the second ring closure reaction and they
can be separated from the crude product. ¹⁰ However, the synthesis of anti-1 is easier starting
from cryptophane-A and larger quantities of this compound can be obtained by this way.

The fact that spontaneous resolution occurs with the *syn*-3 compound during the
crystallization process is also an interesting feature worth discussing. Indeed, the formation of
a racemate has rarely been observed with cryptophanes, since most of them crytallize as racemic compounds.¹⁴ Thus, the production of larger quantities of *syn*-3 would allow us to rapidly isolate the two enantiomers of this cryptophane without the use of costly HPLC methods.¹⁵ It is noteworthy that a large range of new enantiopure derivatives could be obtain by this way.

NMR spectroscopy appeared to be the spectroscopic tool of choice to investigate Cs⁺. Thanks to their large electronic cloud these two heavy atoms are known to be very sensitive to a change of their surrounding environment. For instance, in the presence of these two cations, the water-soluble *anti*-cryptophanes show a specific signature, which is usually observable at room temperature. The Cs@cryptophane complexes give a specific spectral signature shifted by several hundred of ppm towards low frequencies on the ¹³³Cs spectrum, as a consequence of the strong shielding effect induced by the aromatic ring current. Here, the chemical shift observed for the Cs⁺@*syn*-2 complex is shifted by δ = -120 ppm towards high frequency, a value significantly lower than the chemical shift observed with the *anti*-1 congener and other cryptophanes of *anti*-configuration.⁷b,⁷c The higher rigidity of the cryptophane backbone and the larger cavity of the *syn*-2 allows us to explain this result. Indeed, the *syn*-2 compound is not able to modify its structure to maximize the interaction with the cesium cation as easily as the *anti*-1 compound. As a consequence, the shielding effect induced by the aromatic ring current is not as effective as that observed with its congener.

A fast in-out exchange dynamics is also observed with the Cs⁺@*syn*-2 complex above room temperature, leading to a unique ¹³³Cs NMR signal. Decreasing the temperature allows us to slow down the exchange dynamics of ¹³³Cs and two distinct NMR signals start to appear at 285 K and below. Thus, in the presence of cesium, compound *syn*-2 differs significantly from the *anti*-1 congener. Previously, two distinct behaviors were observed with the water-soluble cryptophanes in the presence of cesium salt.⁷c For cryptophanes showing very high affinity for
the $Cs^+$ cation a sharpening of the $^{133}$Cs NMR signal was observed when increasing the temperature. This is the case of the $Cs^+@anti-1$ complex that gives rise to a very sharp $^{133}$Cs NMR signal at 345 K compared to that observed at room temperature. The sharpening of the $^{133}$Cs NMR signal depends on the molecular symmetry of the host. For instance, we have observed that the higher the symmetry of the cryptophane the sharper the $^{133}$Cs NMR signal.$^{7b,7d,16}$ An opposite effect was observed for cryptophanes showing a moderate or low affinity for the $Cs^+$ cation and a sharpening of the $^{133}$Cs NMR signal is observed upon decreasing the temperature. For, instance, the $Cs^+@cryptophane-233$ complex shows this behavior as a function of the temperature.$^{7b}$ Our results reveal that the $Cs^+@syn-2$ complex behave similarly. Thus, $^{133}$Cs NMR spectroscopy allows us to predict whether water-soluble cryptophanes show high or moderate affinity for this cation. Similar experiments were attempted with *syn-2* and thallium salts. Unfortunately, in each case, we observed the formation of a precipitate upon addition of a Thallium(I) salt, and the liquid-state NMR experiments were impossible.

Despite the structural similarities that exist between the *anti-1* and *syn-2*, these two compounds differ greatly in their physical properties from a general perspective. Thus, a little change in the arrangement of the O-CH₂-CH₂-O linkers has a strong impact on the overall physical properties of the *syn-2* derivative compared to *anti-1*. For instance, the solubility properties of *syn-2* are significantly modified compared to that of *anti-1* in the same conditions and this compound is only soluble in a limited range of pH. On the other hand, the arrangement of the three linkers also modifies significantly the binding properties of compound *syn-2* with respect to the *anti-1* derivative. Indeed, we observe that the affinity of this host for $Cs^+$ and $Tl^+$ cations are decreased by five orders of magnitude with respect to *anti-1*. In addition, compound *syn-2* does not show any affinity for the $Rb^+$ cation whereas a relatively high binding constant $K = 9.2 \times 10^5$ M⁻¹ has been measured with the diastereomer
*anti-1* in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O. Thus, despite the presence of six phenol functions grafted on its skeleton, the *syn-2* compound behaves like the recently studied C₃-cryptophane derivative whose skeleton is composed only of three phenol functions and three carboxylic acid functions.⁷ª

At first sight, a change in the volume of the cavity could be invoked to explain this
difference in behavior between these two cryptophanes but we have previously shown that
this parameter is not crucial to explain the recognition properties of cationic species by the
water-soluble cryptophanes. Indeed, we have shown that *anti*-cryptophanes with cavity
volume larger than that of *syn-2* show high affinity for the Rb⁺, Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ cations. For
instance, a cryptophane-233 derivative possessing one O-CH₂-CH₂-O linker and two O-CH₂-
CH₂-CH₂-O linkers still show good affinity for Rb⁺, Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ with measured binding
constants K = 3.2×10⁴, 4.1×10⁷ and 3.7×10⁸ M⁻¹, respectively.⁷b Thus, another explanation has
to be found to explain this difference of behavior. Previous studies have revealed that the
number of phenol groups grafted onto the cryptophane skeleton is pivotal to observe good
complexation constants with the Rb⁺, Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ cations.⁷c Thus, a decrease in the number of
phenolic functions has a strong impact on the ability of these hosts to bind cationic species.
For instance, the water-soluble cryptophane decorated with three phenol groups and three
carboxylic acid functions binds moderately the Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ cations in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O.⁷a
On the other hand, DFT calculations have suggested that coulombic interactions between the
cationic species and the phenolate group play an important role in the stabilization of these
complexes.¹⁶ Herein, both *anti-1* and *syn-2* possess the same number of OH groups and only
the spatial arrangement of the phenol functions is modified. Therefore, we must assume that a
change in the arrangement of the three O-CH₂-CH₂-O bonds affects the chemical properties of
the phenol groups to some extent, making the ionization state of the OH groups more difficult
in the case of the *syn-2* derivative. The difficulties to deprotonate in part the six OH groups in
compound syn-2, could explain the both the lower solubility of this derivative compared to the *anti*-1 derivative and the large difference in the association constants observed between these two derivatives. This assumption seems to be supported by a comparative study of the structure of these two compounds. In the case of syn-2 derivative it can be observed that the OH groups grafted on its skeleton are facing each other. In contrast, the six phenol functions are eclipsed in the structure of the *anti*-1 derivative, making them less likely to interact with each other. Consequently, a greater difference in the $pK_a$ of the OH groups should result in the case of the syn-2 derivative compared to the *anti*-1 derivative. This interpretation seems reasonable and allows us to explain the isothermal titration experiments measured for both compounds *anti*-1 and *syn*-2. Our assumption is also supported by the fact that the forward and reverse titration experiments of compound *syn*-2 are more sensitive to a small pH change of the solution compared to the *anti*-1 diastereomer. In addition, different enthalpograms are observed in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O and in the NaOH/H₂O-KCl buffer in the case of the thallium complexation for compound *syn*-2. In contrast, compound *anti*-1 does not show such variation and the forward and reverse titration are found similar in shape. Unfortunately, this assumption remains difficult to verify experimentally owing to the low solubility of *syn*-2 in aqueous solutions that prevents an accurate determination of the $pK_a$ of the phenol functions.

Furthermore, in the case of *anti*-1 and *syn*-2, the quantum calculations did not allow for accurate determination of the $pK_a$ values of the phenolic functions. The difficulties in fitting the experimental ITC data in the case of Tl⁺@syn-2 complex also raise some questions.

Indeed, this problem does not seem to arise for the Cs⁺@syn-2 whatever the experimental conditions. It is therefore possible that additional interactions take place with the Tl⁺@syn-2 due to its lower solubility, as was the case in the <sup>205</sup>Tl NMR studies. Nevertheless, precipitation of this complex does not seem to occur in the cell since the enthalpogram shows
a very characteristic pattern in this case.¹⁷ Instead, small aggregates are formed in solution, resulting in additional interactions.

Overall, our results show that a change in the conformation of the O-CH₂-CH₂-O linkers of cryptophanes not only affects the cavity volume and the size of the portals, it also modifies the chemical properties of the chemical functions grafted onto the cryptophane skeleton. In the example reported here, a change in the chemical properties of the OH groups strongly affect the ability of compound *syn-2* to accommodate cationic species in basic solution as easily as its diastereomer *anti-1*. Thus, the difficulty for the *syn-2* compound to have all six phenol groups fully deprotonated can be suggested to explain the poor binding properties of this compound. As a result, in its ability to bind cationic species, the *syn-2* compound has more similarities with a previous cryptophane decorated with only three phenolic functions that moderately binds Cs⁺ and Tl⁺ than with its *anti-1* diastereomer that shows a very high affinity for these two species.

## CONCLUSION

We report the synthesis and the characterization of cryptophane *syn-2* as well as its crystal structure. This compound is the diastereomer molecule of cryptophane *anti-1*, which is known to bind very well the cesium and thallium(I) cations in aqueous solvent. However, despite the structural similarities that exist between these two compounds, our study reveals that from a general point of view, the physical properties of these two derivatives are significantly different. We noticed for instance, that these two hosts show large differences in their binding properties toward the Cs⁺ and the Tl⁺ cations. Indeed, isothermal calorimetric titration experiments performed in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O or in NaOH/H₂O-KCl buffer reveal that the *syn-2* compound has a decreased affinity of several orders of magnitude for these two cations compared to the *anti-1* diastereomer studied under the same conditions. In addition,
forward and reverse titration experiments of new derivative *syn*-2 were found more sensitive
to small pH variations compared to the *anti*-1 derivative. To explain this behavior, a larger
difference in the *pK*<sub>a</sub> of the phenol functions grafted onto the *syn*-2 derivative is assumed
compared to the *anti*-1 derivative in which the phenol functions can be more easily ionized at
the same pH. This result shows that a change in the linker arrangement not only alters the
cavity size and flexibility of the host, it can also change the chemical properties of the
substituents grafted onto the cryptophane backbone. In turn, this leads to a significant change
in the molecular recognition properties of the host.

Overall, the results presented in this paper, in combination with previous studies, show that
cryptophanes with an *anti*-configuration exhibit binding of Cs⁺ and TI⁺ cations stronger than
that of *syn*-congeners. Indeed, while the greater rigidity of *syn*-congeners has most often been
cited to explain the weaker binding properties of *syn*-cryptophanes, a change in the physical
properties of the substituents grafted onto the benzene rings may also have a strong impact on
the binding properties of these derivatives.

## EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

### Mass Spectroscopy

Mass spectra (HRMS) were performed by the Centre de Spectrométrie de Masse,
University of Lyon. Analyses were performed with a hybrid quadrupole-time-of-flight mass
spectrometer, microToF QII equipped with an electrospray ion source. Data Analysis 4.0 was
used for instrument control, data collection, and data treatment. HRMS analyses were
performed in full scan MS with a mass range from 50 to 2000 Da at an acquisition rate of 1
Hz. Transfer parameters were as follows: RF Funnel 1, 200 V; RF Funnel 2, 200 V; hexapole,
50 V; transfer time, 70 µs; and PrePulse storage time, 1 µs. Before each acquisition batch,
external calibration of the instrument was performed with a sodium formate clusters solution.
¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded at 300 and 75.5 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts are referenced to Me₄Si (¹H, ¹³C). Column chromatographic separations were carried out over Merck silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm). Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck silica gel TLC plates, F-254. The solvents were distilled prior to use: DMF and CH₂Cl₂ from CaH₂, THF from Na/benzophenone, and pyridine from KOH.

## Single-Crystal X-ray diffraction

Single-crystals were selected and mounted on an Xcalibur Gemini kappa-geometry diffractometer equipped with an Atlas CCD. Data collections were achieved at 150 K using Copper X-ray radiation (l = 1.54184 Å) for *anti-1*, *syn-2* and *syn-3* and Molybdenum radiation (l = 0.71073 Å) for the second X-ray structure of *syn-2*. Intensities were collected by means of the CrysalisPro software.¹⁸ Reflection indexing, unit-cell parameters refinement, Lorentz-polarization correction, peak integration and background determination were carried out with the CrysalisPro software.¹⁸ An analytical absorption correction was applied using the modeled faces of the crystal.¹⁹ The resulting set of *hkl* was used for structure solution and refinement. The structures were solved with the ShelXT structure solution program using the intrinsic phasing solution method and by using Olex2 [4] as the graphical interface.²⁰,²¹ The model was refined with version 2018/3 of ShelXL using least-squares minimization.²² CCDC 2152416-2152417-2152418-2152419 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

## ¹³³Cs NMR spectroscopy

These experiments were performed on a 11.7 T narrow-bore Bruker spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm BBI probehead and z-axis gradient.

## ASSOCIATED CONTENT
## Supporting Information

¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra of compound *syn-2*. Diffusion Light scattering (DLS) of *syn-2* in basic solution. X-ray crystallographic data of *anti-1*, *syn-2* and *syn-3* (CIF). ITC experiments of *anti-1* and *syn-2* in LiOH (0.1 M)/H₂O and NaOH/H₂O-KCl (buffer) (forward and reverse experiments).

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The French National Research Agency (ANR) is acknowledged for financial support (Project ANR19-CE19-0024 PHOENIX).

## AUTHOR INFORMATION

### Corresponding author

*E-mail: [thierry.brotin@ens-lyon.fr](mailto:thierry.brotin@ens-lyon.fr)

### Authors

Patrick Berthault;

E-Mail: [patrick.berthault@cea.fr](mailto:patrick.berthault@cea.fr)

Kevin Chighine;

E-Mail: [kevin.chighine@cea.fr](mailto:kevin.chighine@cea.fr)

Erwann Jeanneau;

E-Mail: [erwann.jeanneau@univ-lyon1.fr](mailto:erwann.jeanneau@univ-lyon1.fr)

## Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

## REFERENCES
(1) (a) Campanella, B.; Colombaioni, L.; Benedetti, E.; Di Ciaula, A.; Ghezzi, L.; Onor, M.; D'Orazio, M.; Giannecchini, R.; Petrini, R.; Bramanti, E. Toxicity of Thallium at Low Doses: A Review. *Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health* **2019**, *16* (23), 4732-4737. (b) Xiao, T.; Yang, F.; Li, S.; Zheng, B.; Ning, Z. Thallium Pollution in China: A Geo-Environmental Perspective. *Sci. Total Environ.* **2012**, *421-422*, 51-58. (c) Peter, A. L. J.; Viraraghavan, T. Thallium: A Review of Public Health and Environmental Concerns. *Environ. Int.* **2005**, *31* (4), 493-501.

(2) (a) Cvjetko, P.; Cvjetko, I.; Pavlica, M. Thallium Toxicity in Humans. *Arch. Environ. Con. Toxicol.* **2010**, *61* (1), 111-118. (b) Saha, A. Thallium Toxicity: A Growing Concern. *Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med.* **2005**, *9* (2), 53-56. (c) Kazantzis, G. Thallium in the Environment and Health Effects. *Environ. Geochem. Hlth* **2000**, *22* (4), 275-280.

(3) (a) (1) López-García, I.; Muñoz-Sandoval, M. J.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Dispersive Micro-Solid Phase Extraction with a Magnetic Nanocomposite Followed by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Measurement for the Speciation of Thallium. *Talanta* **2021**, *228*, 122206.

(b) Liu, J.; Luo, X.; Sun, Y.; Tsang, D. C. W.; Qi, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, N.; Yin, M.; Wang, J.; Lippold, H.; Chen, Y.; Sheng, G. Thallium Pollution in China and Removal Technologies for Waters: A Review. *Environ. Int.*, **2019**, *126*, 771-790. (c) Li, H.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Long, J.; Zhang, G.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, P.; Li, C.; Zhuang, L.; Huang, W. Removal and Recovery of Thallium from Aqueous Solutions via a Magnetite-Mediated Reversible Adsorption-Desorption Process. *J. Clean. Prod.* **2018**, *199*, 705-715. (d) Li, H.; Li, X.; Xiao, T.; Chen, Y.; Long, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, P.; Li, C.; Zhuang, L.; Li, K. Efficient Removal of Thallium(I) from Wastewater Using Flower-Like Manganese Dioxide Coated Magnetic Pyrite Cylinder. *Chem. Eng. J.* **2018**, *353*, 867-877. (e) Huangfu, X.; Jiang, J.; Lu, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Pang, S.-Y.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J. Adsorption and Oxidation of Thallium(I) by a Nanosized Manganese Dioxide. *Water Air Soil Pollut.* **2014**, *226* (1), 2272.
(4) (a) Frei, A.; Rigby, A.; C. Yue, T. T.; Firth, G.; T. Ma, M.; J. Long, N. To Chelate
Thallium(I) - Synthesis and Evaluation of Kryptofix-Based Chelators for 201Tl. *Dalt. Trans.*
**2022**, *51* (23), 9039–9048. (b) Zhai, H.; Xiong, S.; Peng, S.; Sheng, W.; Xu, G.; Sessler, J. L.;
He, Q. Thallium(I) Salts: New Partners for Calix[4]Pyrroles. *Org. Lett.* **2021**, *23*, 7, 2638–
2642. (c) Zhao, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Cheng, X.; Hou, X.; Yang, Y.; Tian, Y.; You, J.; Xu, L.
Adsorptive Removal of Trace Thallium(I) from Wastewater: A Review and New
Perspectives. *J. Hazard. Mat.* **2020**, *393*, 122378. (d) Zhao, Z.; Tian, H.; Zhang, M.; Yang,
Y.; Zhang, H. Molecular Design of Macrocyclic Compounds for Complete Removal of
Thallium(I) from Wastewater. *Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.* **2018**, *25* (34), 34550–34558. (e)
Makrlík, E.; Dybal, J.; Vaňura, P. Interaction of the Thallium Cation with 1,3-Alternate-
25,27-Bis(1-Octyloxy)Calix[4]Arene-Crown-6: Experimental and Theoretical Study. *J. Mol.
Struct.*, **2013**, *1042*, 73–77. (f) Chester, R. T.; Couton, D.; Lobler, R.; Mocerino, M.; Ogden,
M. I.; Pettersen, J. K.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. The extraction of thallium(I) and silver(I)
ions with 1,3-alternate calix[4]arene derivatives. *J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem.*
**2011**, *71*, 471-477. (g) Haddadi, H.; Alizadeh, N.; Shamsipur, M.; Asfari, Z.; Lippolis, V.;
Bazzicalupi, C. Cation-π interaction in Complex Formation Between Tl⁺ Ion and
calix[4]crown-6 and Some calix[4]biscrown-6 Derivatives: Thallium-203 NMR, Proton
NMR, and X-ray Evidence. *Inorg. Chem.* **2010**, *49*, 15, 6874-6882. (h) Cuc, D.; Bouguet-
Bonnet, S.; Morel-Desrosiers, N.; Morel, J.-P.; Mutzenhardt, P.; Canet, D. Behavior of
Cesium and Thallium Cations inside a Calixarene Cavity as Probed by Nuclear Spin
Relaxation. Evidence of Cation-π Interactions in Water. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2009**, *113*, 31,
10800-10807. (i) Roper, E. D.; Talanov, V. S.; Butcher, R. J.; Talanova, G. G. Selective
Recognition of Thallium(I) by 1,3-Alternate Calix[4]arene-bis(crown-6 Ether) : A New Talent
of the Known Ionophore. *Supramol. Chem.* **2008**, *20*, 217-219. (j) Talanova, G. G.; Roper, E.
D.; Buie, N. M.; Gorbunova, M. G.; Bartsch, R. A.; Talanov, V. S. Novel Fluorogenic
Calix[4]arene-bis(crown-6-Ether) for Selective Recognition of Thallium(I). *Chem. Commun.* **2005**, *5673-5675*. (k) Matthews, S. E.; Rees, N. H.; Felix, V.; Drew, M. G. B.; Beer, P. D. Thallium π-Cation Complexation by Calix[4]tubes: <sup>205</sup>Tl NMR and X-ray Evidence. *Inorg. Chem.* **2003**, *42*, 729-734. (l) Parham, H.; Shamsipur, M. Spectrofluorometric Study of Thallium (I) Complexes with Several Macrocyclic Ligands in Methanol Solution. *Talanta* **1993**, *40* (9), 1353–1356. (m) Yang-Chih, L.; Allison, J.; Popov, A. I. Thallium-205 NMR Study of Tl(I) Macrocyclic Complexes in Nonaqueous Solvents. *Polyhedron* **1985**, *4* (3), 441–445. (n) Shamsipur, M.; Popov, A. I. Multinuclear Nmr Study of Some Alkali and Thallium Complexes with 1,10-Diaza-18-Crown-6 in Nonaqueous Solutions. *Inorg. Chim. Acta* **1980**, *43*, 243–247. (o) Shamsipur, M.; Rounaghi, G.; Popov, A. I. Sodium-23, Cesium-133 and Thallium-205 NMR Study of Sodium, Cesium and Thallium Complexes with Large Crown Ethers in Nonaqueous Solutions. *J. Solution Chem.* **1980**, *9* (9), 701–714.

(5) (a) Izosimova, Y.; Gurova, I.; Tolpeshta, I.; Karpukhin, M.; Zakusin, S.; Zakusina, O.; Samburskiy, A.; Krupskaya, V. Adsorption of Cs(I) and Sr(II) on Bentonites with Different Compositions at Different PH. *Minerals* **2022**, *12* (7), 862. (b) Jiménez-Reyes, M.; Almazán-Sánchez, P. T.; Solache-Ríos, M. Radioactive Waste Treatments by Using Zeolites. A Short Review. *J. Environ. Radioact.* **2021**, *233*, 1066-108.
(c) Estelrich, J.; Busquets, M. A. Prussian Blue: A Safe Pigment with Zeolitic-Like Activity. *Int. J Mol. Sci.* **2021**, *22* (2), 780.
(d) Wang, J.; Zhuang, S. Removal of Cesium Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Various Separation Technologies. *Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol* **2019**, *18* (2), 231–269.
(e) Figueiredo, B. R.; Cardoso, S. P.; Portugal, I.; Rocha, J.; Silva, C. M. Inorganic Ion Exchangers for Cesium Removal from Radioactive Wastewater. *Sep. Purif. Rev.* **2018**, *47* (4), 306–336.
(f) Johan, E.; Yamada, T.; Munthali, M. W.; Kabwadza-Corner, P.; Aono, H.; Matsue, N. Natural Zeolites as Potential Materials for Decontamination of Radioactive Cesium. *Procedia*
Environ. Sci. **2015**, *28*, 52–56. (g) Zhaoyi, T.; Zhaoya, H.; Dong, Z.; Xiaolin, W. Structural Characterization of Ammonium Molybdophosphate with Different Amount of Cesium Adsorption. *J Radioanal Nucl Chem* **2014**, *299* (3), 1165–1169.

(6) see for instance: (a) Wang, J.; Zhuang, S. Cesium Separation from Radioactive Waste by Extraction and Adsorption Based on Crown Ethers and Calixarenes. *Nucl. Eng. Technol.* **2020**, *52* (2), 328–336. (b) Pichierri, F. Macrocycles for the Complexation of Radiocesium: A Concise Review of Crystallographic and Computational Studies. *J Radioanal Nucl Chem* **2017**, *311* (2), 1251–1263. (c) Albelda, M. T.; Frías, J. C.; García-España, E.; Schneider, H.-J. Supramolecular Complexation for Environmental Control. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2012**, *41* (10), 3859–3877. (d) Mokhtari, B.; Pourabdollah, K.; Dallali, N. A Review of Calixarene Applications in Nuclear Industries. *J Radioanal Nuclear Chem* **2010**, *287* (3), 921–934. (e) Wintergerst, M. P.; Levitskaia, T. G.; Moyer, B. A.; Sessler, J. L.; Delmau, L. H. Calix[4]Pyrrole: A New Ion-Pair Receptor As Demonstrated by Liquid–Liquid Extraction. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2008**, *130* (12), 4129–4139. (f) Casnati, A.; Pochini, A.; Ungaro, R.; Ugozzoli, F.; Arnaud, F.; Fanni, S.; Schwing, M.-J.; Egberink, R. J. M.; de Jong, F.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Synthesis, Complexation, and Membrane Transport Studies of 1,3-Alternate Calix[4]Arene-Crown-6 Conformers: A New Class of Cesium Selective Ionophores. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **1995**, *117* (10), 2767–2777. (g) Mei, E.; Popov, A. I.; Dye, J. L. Complexation of the Cesium Cation by Macrocyclic Polyethers in Various Solvents. A Cesium-133 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Exchange. *J. Phys. Chem.* **1977**, *81* (17), 1677–1681.

(7) (a) Brotin, T.; Berthault, P.; Pitrat, D.; Mulatier, J.-C. Selective capture of Thallium and Cesium by a Cryptophane Soluble at neutral pH. *J. Org. Chem.* **2020**, *85*, 15, 9622–9630. (b)
Brotin, T.; Goncalves, S.; Berthault, P.; Cavagnat, D.; Buffeteau, T. Influence of the Cavity Size of Water-Soluble Cryptophanes on Their Binding Properties for Cesium and Thallium Cations. *J. Phys. Chem B* **2013**, *117*, 41, 12593–12601. (c) Brotin, T.; Cavagnat, D.; Berthault, P.; Montserret, R.; Buffeteau, T. Water-Soluble Molecular Capsule for the Complexation of Cesium and Thallium Cations. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2012**, *116*, 35, 10905–10914. (d) Brotin, T.; Montserret, R.; Bouchet, A.; Cavagnat, D.; Linares, M.; Buffeteau, T. High Affinity of Water-Soluble Cryptophanes for Cesium Cations. *J. Org. Chem.* **2012**, *77*, 2, 1198–1201.

(8) Brotin, T.; Dutasta, J.-P. Cryptophanes and Their Complexes—Present and Future. *Chem. Rev.* **2009**, *109*, 1, 88–130.

(9) (a) Doll, M.; Berthault, P.; Léonce, E.; Boutin, C.; Jeanneau, E.; Brotin, T.; De Rycke, N. Study of syn and anti Xenon-Cryptophanes Complexes Decorated with Aromatic Amine Groups: Chemical Platforms for Accessing New Cryptophanes. *J. Org. Chem.* **2022**, *87*, 5, 2912-2920. (b) Doll, M.; Berthault, P.; Léonce, E.; Boutin, C.; Buffeteau, T.; Daugey, N.; Vanthuyne, N.; Jean, M.; Brotin, T.; De Rycke, N. Are the Physical Properties of Xe@Cryptophane Complexes Easily Predictable? The Case of syn- and anti-Tris-aza-Cryptophanes. *J. Org. Chem.* **2021**, *86*, 11, 7648-7658. (c) Canceill, J.; Césario, M.; Collet, A.; Guilhem, J.; Riche, C.; Pascard, C. Selective recognition of neutral molecules: ¹H n.m.r. Study of the complexation of CH₂Cl₂ and CH₂Br₂ by cryptophane-D in solution and crystal structure of its CH₂Cl₂ cavitate. *J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.* **1986**, 339-341.

(10) Brotin, T.; Jeanneau, E.; Berthault, P.; Léonce, E.; Pitrat, D.; Mulatier, J.-C. Synthesis of Cryptophane-B: Crystal Structure and Study of Its Complex with Xenon. *J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *83*, 23, 14465–14471.

(11) Spek, L. A. PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. *Acta Cryst.* **2015**, *C71*, 9-18.
(12) (a) Herrera, I.; Winnik, M. A. Differential Binding Models for Direct and Reverse Isothermal Titration Calorimetry. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2016**, *120*, 9, 2077-2086. (b) Grolier, J.-P. E.; Del Rio, J. M. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Application of the Gibbs-Duhem Equation to the Study of the Relationship Between Forward and Reverse Titrations. *J. Solution Chem.* **2015**, *44*, 987-1003.

(13) Léonce, E.; Brotin, T.; Berthault, P. syn-Cryptophanes: macrocyclic compounds with optimized characteristics for the design of ¹²⁹Xe NMR-based biosensors. *Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys.*, **2022**, *24*, 24793–24799.

(14) Canceill, J.; Cesario, M.; Collet, A.; Guilhem, J.; Riche, C.; Pascard, C. Selective Recognition of Neutral Molecules: ¹H NMR Study of the Complexation of CH₂Cl₂ and CH₂Br₂ by Cryptophane-D in Solution and Crystal Structure of Its CH₂Cl₂ Cavitate. *J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.* **1986**, 339-341.

(15) Jacques, J.; Collet, A.; Wilen, S. H. *Enantiomers, Racemates, and Resolutions*; Wiley, New York, **1981**.

(16) Chapellet, L. L.; Dognon, J.-P.; Jean, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Berthault, P.; Buffeteau, T.; Brotin, T. Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Complexation of Cesium and Thallium Cations by a Water-Soluble Cryptophane. *ChemistrySelect.*, **2017**, *2*, 5292-5300.

(17) Eggers, D. K.; Fu S.; Ngo, D. V.; Vuong, E. H.; Brotin, T. Thermodynamic Contribution of Water in Cryptophane Host-Guest Binding Reaction. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2020**, *124*, 30, 6585-6591.

(18) Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, CrysAlis(Pro) Software system, version 1.171.40.67a, Rigaku Corporation, Oxford, UK. **2019**

(19) Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. The analytical calculation of absorption in multifaceted crystals. *Acta Cryst.* **1995**, *A51*, 887-897.
(20) Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT – Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination *Acta Cryst.* **2015**, *A71*, 3-8.

(21) Dolomanov O.V.; Bourhis L.J.; Gildea R.J.; Howard J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a
complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. *J. Appl. Cryst.* **2009**, *42*, 339-
341.

(22) Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. *Acta Cryst.* **2015**, *C27*, 3-8.

For Table of Contents Only

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>