# True Value of Telecentre Contribution to Bario Community Development

Ghazala Tabassum, Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer, Roger Harris, Alvin W. Yeo

► To cite this version:

Ghazala Tabassum, Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer, Roger Harris, Alvin W. Yeo. True Value of Telecentre Contribution to Bario Community Development. 14th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (ICT4D), May 2017, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. pp.640-653, 10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_52. hal-01650104

HAL Id: hal-01650104

https://inria.hal.science/hal-01650104

Submitted on 28 Nov 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# True Value of Telecentre Contribution to Bario Community Development

Ghazala Tabassum¹, Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer², Roger Harris³ and Alvin W. Yeo⁴

¹,²,³Institute of Social Informatics and Technological Innovations (ISITI), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), ⁴University of Waikato

¹ghazala.tabasum@gmail.com, ²nara@fit.unimas.my,

³roger.harris@rogharris.org, ⁴awyeo@waikato.ac.nz

**Abstract.** Telecentres have been widely deployed worldwide particularly in the area of ICTD to bridge the gap between urban and rural development. This paper explores the value and impact of a telecentre on the community living in Bario, a small village in the highlands of Malaysia. The focus is mainly on the less studied tangible and intangible impacts of the telecentre on users and non-users. This topic is discussed based on stories collected through "Most Significant Change Technique (MSC)" providing facts from the insights of the local community. In nutshell, Bario community has greatly benefited from the use of the telecentre, whether directly or indirectly, particularly in the areas of connectedness, psychological empowerment, and financial improvement. Greater awareness and use of the telecentre shall continue to benefit this small rural community in their social and economic wellbeing.

**Keywords:** ICTD; Telecentre; ICTs, Users; Non-Users; Intangible impact; Tangible impact; Socio-Economic Impact.

## 1 Introduction

The emergence of ICTD interventions has played a crucial role in driving developing countries towards modernization particularly in the area of socio-economic development. The growing body of literature has further strengthens the impacts of ICTD interventions in measuring the tangible contributions of ICT, forgoing the intangible impact evaluation of ICTs especially on the non-user beneficiaries [27]. Thus, a question arises whether or not these unquantifiable intangible impacts such as self-esteem, sense of self-efficacy, self-confidence, enhanced capabilities, social cohesion, social capital etc. are important for community well-being and growth. Sey et al. [24] accentuate on the "impacts of public access to ICT" on users and non-users, stating that this issue needs to be put in focus to study the dynamics of public access impacts on non-users". The assessment of public access impacts often neglects to examine non-users, although they could constitute past and potential beneficiaries [23]. Confirmation is made by studying the numerous benefits that ICT's have given to both users and non-users beneficiaries in their respective socio-economic spheres. Grunfeld [14] claims that numerous ICT4D project appraisals frequently neglect to answer key inquiries
concerning how these ICT activities can add to empowerment, capability and sustain-
ability. According to [4], “by fostering a sense of belonging and connectedness to
community and to a larger world, public access to computers often leads to feelings of
empowerment and development of social capital, two intangible factors that are criti-
cal for community development”. According to [13], “Measuring the development
impacts of ICTD interventions continues to be an unresolved problem when trying to
include non-traditional development measures beyond economic growth, particularly
empowerment and social capital”. According to [27], evaluating, the intangible im-
pact of ICTs remains an unresolved issue, particularly when it comes to measuring
intangible impact on non-user. Although these outcomes were mostly measured quan-
titatively in social sciences using self-efficacy and self-esteem scales, focus was less
on its ICTD perspective [26]. This strengthens that the point of ICTs impact in non-
traditional and intangible contexts remain unreciprocated [11] [13] [19] to an extent
that it is not enough to place emphasis only on the tangible and quantifiable benefits
of ICT that is easily measurable. According to researchers, intangible impact of ICTs
is hard to measure on people’s well-being [9] [11] but social impact can be measured
and explained qualitatively [27]. Amartya Sen Development approach was adopted to
understand the development experienced by the telecentre users and non-users. This
Capability Approach (CA) sees development as “a process of expanding the real free-
doms that people enjoy” and emphasizes the need for the “expansion of ‘capabilities’
of persons to lead the kinds of lives they value [22]. Empowerment is reflected in
Sen’s CA whereby human development is viewed as expanding people’s capabilities
and achievements. Empowerment is an important dimension of human development
[15] and the capacity to make and transform choices is influenced by two factors;
namely, agency and opportunity structure [2].

## 2 Methodology

The MSC is a participatory monitoring and evaluation technique. It is used for collect-
ing, discussing & selecting stories about the significant changes that people experi-
ence resulting from a program or initiatives [7] [28]. According to [7] [28], consider
the importance of storytelling technique “as stories are one of the more participative
forms of communication. Stories can deal with complexity and context; sometimes
stories can carry hard messages. Stories told in casual conversation can harness an-
other sort of information; they provide insights into how storytellers construct reality
and to what they attach importance”. However, various research studies documented
around the world have used various methodologies to evaluate the telecentre impacts
on the rural communities, which aimed to obtain sufficient information from the
community. So far, researchers have succeeded to some extent in the impact evalua-
tion but some part of impact remains concealed. Thus, with the intention to evaluate
the intangible impact of the telecentre, we considered the MSC approach more suita-
ble than other orthodox research approaches.
## 2.1 Four Steps & Procedures Used in the Main Study Data Collection Process (Interviews)

This study has adopted 4 out of 10 steps of MSC method [7] for the main empirical study: Step 1 identify "domains of change" by gathering relevant stories from users and non-users of the telecentre with the aim to evaluate direct and indirect impacts resulting in tangible and intangible benefits. 'Domains of change' are used to categorize changes reported through the monitoring system [17]. Step 2 collect stories in an informal way by keeping participants relaxed and interview questions were kept simple. A total of 22 "tape-recorded" interviews were collected and transcribed from audio to text into two pages with formatted layout. Step 3 involves reviewing and representing process of selection & validation for identifying and selecting the MSC stories within the set of collected stories. Step 4 involves the analysis of the stories. The first method uses "content analysis" data into valid categories through inductive inferences via tentative constant comparable examination [21]. The purpose is to identify the domains and sub-domains of change in collected stories, extracting the MSC to illustrate covering the variables of respondents' life experiences [16]. Second method uses "Leximancer 4.5" semantic [31] technology to study the participants' linguistic research Douglas [8] converting textual documents into visually conceptualized mapping-context-extracted information. Leximancer functionalities employ two stages of information extraction: semantic and relational data, by calculating frequencies of each word for each stage using non-linear dynamics and machine learning algorithm. Results are displayed as hierarchical concept maps where relationship between individual concepts/themes can be explored [25].

# 3 Data Analysis

Data Analysis was categorized into three parts using three methods:

**Method 1:** Using Microsoft Excel to analyze charts/diagrams to interpret the demographic profile of respondents in the form of percentage of number people that obtained benefits from the telecentre.

**Method 2:** Involved two techniques, the first "Content Analysis" analyzes the collected stories and categorizing each significant stories (reviewed transcript) into information/themes, further ascertain for information validity and relevancy. The second technique used Leximancer 4.5 to provide results for the textual documents.

**Method 3:** In order to measure the extent of indirect intangible impact, percentages calculated method was adopted as it determines "the percentage of people experiencing a particular impact in a particular area, noting whether it was tangible, intangible, direct, indirect, positive or negative, or non-existent" [24].

### 3.1 Key Findings

Results are segregated into relevant parts: The first part illustrates the demographic profile of usage pattern. The second part describes the Content Analysis of the stories (see Table 1) and Leximancer analysis results. The demographic Profile illustrates that a total 22 participants of the semi-structured interview sessions were divided according to gender specification consisting 6 females and 16 males (refer Figure 1). Respondents (users & non-users) age varied from 19yrs to 50+yrs (refer Figure 2).
Interviewees were from all occupations representing male, female, young, old, users, and non-users (Refer Figure 3: Figure 4). Internet usage pattern for 11 users varied from “Twice a week” to “Twice a year” and “Proxy help”. Among 11 non-user respondents, only 3 obtained proxy help, whereas 6 benefited through friends and family help, and the remaining 2 have never experienced the telecentre facilities due to living outside. (Refer Figure 5).

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 2</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 4</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>Figure 5</figcaption></figure>

## 3.2 Content Analysis: Table 1. Domains and sub-domains of change based on 11 Users & 11 Non-Users

<table><thead><tr><td>Domain of Change</td><td>Sub-domain of Change</td><td>Sub-domain of Change</td><td>Sub-domain of Change</td><td>Sub-domain of Change</td><td>Sub-domain of Change</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Connectedness</td><td>Feelings of belongingness: being part of a stronger community of national or international</td><td>Ease of better communication and information access: Telecentre facilitates a faster communication and easy access to information</td><td>Communication via Proxy help</td><td>Strengthen social ties b/w Friends & Families (F&F)</td><td>Mobile: Basic call & WhatsApp</td></tr><tr><td>Psychological empowerment</td><td>Self-efficacy: the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations [20]</td><td>Self-Esteem: Self-esteem refers to the totality of the individual's thoughts and feeling including a positive or negative attitude toward the self [3]</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Telecentre sustainability</td><td>Internet connection e.g. poor internet connectivity</td><td>Demand for services: (Request to reopen Telecentre premises, ICT literacy Trainings, Staff member)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acknowledgement of Telecentre (TC) role in community development</td><td>Business opportunities: Telecentre provides various opportunities in the form of business solutions i.e. homestay and tour guides, handicrafts.</td><td>Associated developments: e.g. road, farming mechanization, new clinic, festival, road, tourism</td><td>Community Exposure: Experiencing the outside world</td><td>Boosterism: the enthusiastic promotion of a person, organization, or cause[30]</td><td>Financial & Time savings</td></tr><tr><td>Financial improvements</td><td>Tourism: e.g. Homestay, tour guide, handicrafts income</td><td>Agriculture: e.g. Farming</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Knowledge and skills</td><td>Knowledge transformation: knowledge sharing means an expertise, information, & skills are transferred from benefactor to beneficiaries</td><td>Knowledge gained through Internet: Learned new things: e.g. cooking recipes, dance, designing,</td><td>Staying updated on news: Keep updating oneself on local & global news</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Early communication issues</td><td>Communication via Postal Service & Radio Call</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
3.2.1 Content Analysis: Domains and sub domains of change

Figure 6 reflects responses received from both the telecentre users and non-users. The most common domains of change annotated by the respondents in the telecentre im- pact areas were early communication issues, connectedness, and the telecentre sus- tainability with a total percentage of 100%. This was followed by acknowledgement of TC role in community development (users: 100% & non-users:91%), psychological empowerment (users: 100% & non-users:82), financial improvements (users: 55% & non-users:36%), and Knowledge and skills (users:45% & non-users:27%). The find- ings indicate that all domains of change in the telecentre impact area showed greater improvements in the perception of both users and non-users about the telecentre role in community development.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Figure 6: Domains of change (Reported by Users & Non-users)</figcaption></figure>

A closer look at key findings shows both users and non-users perceived positive tangible and intangible impact of telecentre. Unlike non-users, users benefited at large. However, most surprisingly, the percentage ratio of non-users in the area of intangible impact was phenomenal such as connectedness at 100%, and psychological empowerment at 82%. It is interesting to note that unlike users, non-users lack the ICT skills. But through indirect assistance those non-users who had alterna- tive access to Internet exhibit feelings of connectedness and positive psychological empowerment. The study found that they have positive attitude towards themselves and the changes they have experienced both in tangible and intangible impacts. As illustrated, both respondent groups indicated communication as the major issue they faced earlier for the community inhabitants to be connected with their loved ones as well as keeping updated with the global & local events. But with the presence of the telecentre as a hub of easy internet access, the communication barrier is bridged and social ties with friends and families is strengthened. The business opportunities brought about by the telecentre have benefited both users and non-users. Baron, Gomez [4] stated, "This sense of connectedness is strengthened by the speed and ease with which people can now access multiple sources of information, and it results in a sense of empowerment and confidence building on the part of users of ICT".

Thus, these results indicate that the social connectedness and access to all variety of information without limit further led to sense of empowerment and confidence-building, stronger self-esteem of the respondents. User and non-user respondents stated that their ability to cope with new challenges have improved along with their decision-making power. These insights reaffirmed the presence of intangible impacts of the telecentre within the community.
3.2.2 Content Analysis of Stories by Sub-Domains (Users and Non-Users)

Figure 7 below illustrates the elements that make up the domain “Connectedness” in accordance to the given percentages per elements. It is worth noting that non-users who are not able to access the telecentre services by themselves acquired proxy help while other non-users who gained access to information through external sources received benefits indirectly. Communication has been the main issue that was always in the limelight agenda of users and non-users through their collective stories. The telecentre brought positive changes encompassing “ease of better communication and information access”, “access to the world at large” to a “sense of belongingness”. This strengthens social bond among friends and family members living outside of the community. Putting further into focus is the use of mobile communications (smart phones, ordinary mobile phone) in particular the use of “WhatsApp” for digital inter-action.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Sub-domains of change within Connectedness Domains</figcaption></figure>

Figure 8 illustrates the elements that make up the domain of ‘the telecentre sustainability’, which indicate that all respondents reflect their need for telecentre. Figure 9 illustrates the elements that make up the domain “Psychological Empowerment”, which show the presence of the positive “Psychological Empowerment” pattern among users and non-users. Figure 10 illustrates the elements that make up the domain “Financial Improvements”, which provides stronger evidence of the business opportunities brought by the telecentre for the tourism livelihood increase the household income of the community. Figure 11 illustrates the elements that make up the domain “Knowledge and skills” revealed the positive impacts of the telecentre towards the community addressed by users and non-users in terms of improved viability of information and communication providing a catalyst for the community to enrich their knowledge about the outside world. Figure 12 below illustrates the elements that make up the domain “Acknowledgement of TC role in community development”, revealed the telecentre’s positive attributes that contributes to positive opportunities such as in Eco-Tourism and other sectors of developments etc., resulting in financial improvements amongst users and non-users lifestyle.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8:** Percentage of stories addressing sub domains of change within the telecentre Sustainability</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9:** Percentage of stories addressing sub domains of change within Psychological empowerment</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10** Percentage of stories addressing sub domains of change within Domain of Financial Improvements</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 11** Percentage of stories addressing sub domains of change within Domain of Knowledge and skills</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 12:** Sub-domains of change within Acknowledgement of TC role in community development</figcaption></figure>

## 3.3 Analysis of Collected Stories from Users and Non-Users with Leximancer 4.5

At this stage, Leximancer 4.5 assisted in the analytical review by calculating, extracting and displaying the collected stories, providing visual interpretation of the actual data uploaded from the MS Word database aligned by two sentences per block prose threshold of 1. The results are shown in (Users: Table 2 and Figure 13: Non-Users Table 4 and Figure 14), which depict concepts/themes along with its connectivity measurement extracted from analysis of results in the form of visual concepts to present interactive connectivity. The map entails conceptual clusters as colored circles to summarize semantic point connection of particular groups of concepts (colored circles for themes and small grey dots for annotated concepts). Relational value between concepts is dependent upon range between concepts, which represents top-level classification of noted stories, the larger the circle the richer the content impact factor of concept/themes.

## 3.4 Users Theme Map and Concept Nodes within Themes

These 7 themes highlight the users' perception of the telecentre's positive influence on beneficiaries, positive socio-economic change at individual level, and collective level. Dominant themes fall into the categories of "Internet", followed closely by "People", "Use", "Time", "Satisfied", and "Radio". Themes overlay depicts users' (individual and collective level) experience level in using the telecentre internet access to improve socio-economic status since these themes materialized larger conceptual semantic relationship, which exists within the threshold rate of 100%. Closer examination on these 7 major themes indicated the potential of expanding the telecentre's role towards improving rural development in terms of "Better Communication", "Information Access", connectivity to the outside world and financial improvement to further strengthen the sense of connectedness. Respondents were satisfied with their wellbeing and the changes that came into their livelihood through either direct or indirect approach provided by the telecentre as stated below:

**User1:** If the telecentre did not exist, we will have struggling to get access to the outside world; of course, it is a challenge to get something and a way to improve our life. **Users2:** Telecentre improved my motivation for living better life. The telecentre did motivate me because with the telecentre I can communicate with the outside world.
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>Figure 13 Users Theme Map and Concept</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 2:** Theme & Concept Coding Classifications and explanation</caption><thead><tr><td>Theme</td><td>Concepts</td><td>Hits</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Internet</td><td>Internet, outside, world, telecentre, telecentre, information, communicate, things, doing, development, access</td><td>268</td></tr><tr><td>people</td><td>people, Bario, example, Miri, coming, government, days, homestay</td><td>182</td></tr><tr><td>use</td><td>use, community, important, feel, better, life, family, internet, power</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>time</td><td>time, used, using, day, year, business</td><td>132</td></tr><tr><td>course</td><td>course, need, farming</td><td>81</td></tr><tr><td>satisfied</td><td>satisfied</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>radio</td><td>radio</td><td>13</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 3 indicates a summary of 10 high level concepts discovered in the collected stories represented as groups of parallel point connected text that is aligned to represent weighted themes/terms weighted, to present frequencies of influence that each text to determine the frequency of co-occurrence between concepts [41]. The percentage of relevance indicates relationship/linkage between frequently occurring concepts, represented in highly ranked concepts associated to indicate the path of travel between texts [21].

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Table 3:** Count Related concepts and Relevance of the top identified concepts:</figcaption></figure>

### 3.3.2 Analysis of Non-User Stories with Leximancer 4.5.

Figure 14 depicts themes/concepts map from Leximancer analysis. Eight depicted themes represent non-users' evaluation of the telecentre. Closely interrelated concepts representing top-level classification of stories (gray dots) linked by solid lines, suggest how non-users perceived indirect benefits provided by the telecentre, improving their socio-economic status with proxy help. They also expressed satisfaction, which is another fact, that some non-users, even though lacking in IT skills benefit from the acts of others to help them use the telecentre facilities. According to non-users, Internet gave them seamless access to knowledge and social connectivity to, for example, exchange ideas to the outside world and improving farming techniques for sustainable livelihood. Telecentre contributed largely in domains such as "connectedness", "financial improvements" and "psychological empowerment" and enhanced technical skills. Following are the words of interviewees: *Non-User1: The presence of telecentre encouraged me and motivated to explore new opportunities homestays, hand phone.*
**Non-User2:** I did not use it but I know the advantages of this telecentre because it is easy to get information. It has motivated me to live a better life. I am satisfied and proud what I have but I want to improve.

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>Figure 14 Non user's themes/concepts map</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>Table 4: Presents a summary of 8 Higher-Level Themes.</caption><thead><tr><td>Themes</td><td>Concept</td><td>Hits</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Internet</td><td>Internet, people, Bario, use, coming, things, tourist, information</td><td>205</td></tr><tr><td>outside</td><td>outside, world, telecentre, communicate, community, using</td><td>135</td></tr><tr><td>homestay</td><td>homestay, improved, tourists, life, communication</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>family</td><td>family, doing, need, better, income, increased</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>time</td><td>time, change, living, money, farming</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>phone</td><td>phone, used, road</td><td>47</td></tr><tr><td>friends</td><td>friends, working</td><td>35</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>Table 5: Count Related concepts and Relevance of the top identified concepts</figcaption></figure>

## 3.5 Discussion

### 3.5.1 Succinct reflection on Tangible Impact of Telecentre from users and non-users' perspectives

The findings indicate that a domain of change addressed by participants in the area of the telecentre tangible impact was financial improvements at Users: 36%, Non-users: 55%. The percentages of non-users stories in the area of financial impact that addressed the domains of change were considerably higher even though they lack in ICT skills. This suggests that improvements experienced by non-users in this area involved indirect assistance from friends & family, proxy and those who had access to other Internet sources. The sub-domains of change indicate improvements in “Tourism” recorded at Users: 27% & Non-users:36%: “Agriculture” at users: 36%, non-user:27%. This indicates that users with ICT skills obtained considerable higher impact in “Agriculture” whereas non-users obtained in Tourism. Moreover, financial savings users & non-users reported at 27%, business opportunities users & non-users at 91%. The results further indicate that community have experienced the modern way
of farming which resulted in saving their time, labor cost, while some community
people still practices the traditional farming method. But, due to the unavailability of
required labor force, the modern way of farming takes its role in the agriculture socie-
ty of the community. In contrast, non-user farmers benefitted from knowledge shared
by tourists resulted in improving vegetables and fruits yields, which led to increase in
their income. Both respondent groups indicated that Tour guides always receive cli-
ents directly from their associated homestays owners that resulted in their household
income improvements. Both respondents' groups revealed that internet has a huge
role in promoting community to the outside world, which resulted in tourists' influx,
which further led to financial improvements in the business of homestays, tour guides
and farming.

3.5.2 Succinct reflection on Intangible Impact of the telecentre from users and non-users perspectives

Empirical evidence from Bario rural community indicates that the telecentre’s ben-
efits were not limited to direct users but also benefited the non-users, demonstrating
the intangible impact area, all users & non-users (100%) experienced “Connected-
ness”. This finding indicates that “Connectedness” was deemed as the most important
value added benefit to the community with contribution towards bridging communica-
tion barrier between community and outside world, bringing closer family value ties
and business opportunities. Whereas all 11 users (100%) and 9 in 11 non-users (82%)
experienced psychological empowerment. Within the “Psychological Empowerment”,
the focus of change was on the sub-domains of change of “self-efficacy (Users: 100%
Non-users:90%) and “Self-esteem (Users: 100% Non-users:72%), it is pertinent to
mention that 3 non-users had access to other sources than the telecentre. This study
found strong evidence that easy access to communication and information encouraged
the users and non-users to explore new opportunities provided by telecentre for living
better life. Chamberlain [6], who views empowerment more in the perspective of
mental health rehabilitation, refers to empowerment as a process that has a number of
qualities such as decision making power, access to information and resources, and
having a range of options from which to make choices. These have been defined in
this study through data analysis of facts taken for respondent’s feedback. Empower-
ment through ICT means transforming skills into actions to produce a self-determined
change [1] of which non-users who have not been able to use computer and the inter-
net directly at the telecentre but obtained benefits in terms of communication with
family and friends and also dealt with business clients’ registration. In this context,
the results of this study show digital opportunities offered by the telecentre empow-
ered poor marginalized community people to achieve their desired goals.

Thus, the major finding of this study is that the sense of empowerment was not
worthy at an individual level among users, particularly non-users of the telecentre.
The evidence showed the influential impact of Empowerment was not only apparent
in users' beneficiaries group but also in non-users group such as being able to gain
control over social economic conditions results in stronger sense of empowerment,
and positive psychological empowerment (i.e. building confidence and efficacy level,
strengthened sense of self-esteem, enhanced motivation level). From the CA perspec-
tive, respondents who were interviewed from different life style did their best to ex-
pand their capabilities and use their resources from the Eco-Tourism business, farm-
ing or knowledge/skills, which resulted in their tangible and intangible outcomes achievements. Thus, these are the most important intangible outcomes found within collected stories.

### 3.5.3 Leximancer 4.5:
The comparative results obtained through Leximancer 4.5 has shown that the telecentre contributed to positive changes in community's well-being in terms of ease of communication and information access, promoting community to outside world which created/enhanced business opportunities. Analysis suggests the psychological empowerment experienced by users and non-users exhibit high self-esteem, self-efficacy, and positive level of confidence and motivation.

## 4 Conclusion

In conclusion, better communication with internet connectivity has enabled the community to strengthen social bonds among families, friends and business network, giving a sense of connectedness and sense of belonging, financial improvements, enhanced sense of empowerment, enhanced positive Psychological empowerment (building confidence, self-efficacy, strengthened sense of self-esteem, and motivation level). Thus, this study has shown a way to quantifying the intangible impact and shown at least as significant. The adopted theoretical lens provided a deeper understanding of how the telecentre expanded and extended the socio-economic opportunities for community people and how they utilized their abilities to achieve their desired goals. When this project was concluded in July 2016, the telecentre internet Wi-Fi facilities has ended, respondents then have started to make demand for the telecentre services to be re-operated. This study contributes a qualitative methodology approach to the analysis of collected data in the form of stories focused on the MSC within the context of the telecentre tangible/intangible impact on the users& non-users. Thus, the MSC approach was useful to chart stories based on the telecentre impact at individual and collective level.

## 5 References

1. Aji, Z.M. et al. (2010) A Conceptual Model for Psychological Empowerment of Telecentre Users. *Science*, 3(3), pp.71–79.

2. Alsop, R., Bertelsen, M. F., & Holland, J. (2006). *Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation*. World Bank Publications.

3. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies, NY: Cambridge University Press.

4. Baron, L. F., & Gomez, R. (2013). Relationships and connectedness: Weak ties that help social inclusion through public access computing. *Information Technology for Development, 19*(4), 271-295.

5. Brady, R.S.M. (2012). Where is the "System" in the Systemic Risk Literature. Virginia, US, The MITRE Corporation.

6. Chamberlin, J. (1997). A Working Definition of Empowerment. *Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal*, 20(4).

7. Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique. A guide to its use.

8. Douglas, H 2010, 'Building an analysis of new venture startup with Leximancer', in B. Gurd (ed.) *Proceedings of the 24th Annual Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference (ANZAM 2010)*, Adelaide, Australia, 8-10 December 2010, pp. 1-15.

9. Gomez, R. (2008). The quest for intangibles: Understanding ICTs for digital inclusion beyond socio-economic impact. Paper presented at the Prato CIRN 2008 Community Informatics Conference: ICTs for Social Inclusion: What is the Reality.
10. Gomez, R. (2011). Success Factors in Public Access Computing for Development. ICT Influences on Human Development, Interaction, and Collaboration, 97.

11. Gomez, R., & Pather, S. (2012). ICT Evaluation: Are we asking the right questions? *Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries*, 50(5), 1-14.

12. Gómez, R., Hunt, P., & Lamoureux, E. (1999). Telecentre Evaluation and Research: a global perspective. Paper presented at the Telecentre Evaluation: A Global Perspective (Report of an International Meeting on Telecentre Evaluation).

13. Gomez, R., Reed, P., & Chae, H. Y. (2013). Assessment of community wellness outcomes to measure ICT impact. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2.

14. Grunfeld, H. (2007). Framework for evaluating contributions of ICT to capabilities, empowerment and sustainability in disadvantaged communities. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Paper presented at the CPRSouth2 (Communication Policy Research) Conference, 'Empowering rural communities through ICT policy and research', December 15-17, Madras, Chennai.

15. Hamel, J.-Y. 2010. *ICT4D and the Human Development and Capabilities Approach*. Technical Report #37. Available: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdrp_2010_37.pdf

16. Heck, D., & Sweeney, T. (2013). Using most significant change stories to document the impact of the teaching teachers for the future project: An Australian teacher education story. *Australian Educational Computing*, 27(3), 36-47.

17. Keriger, R. (2004). MSC Guide: Based on the Experience of ADRA Laos. A guide to implementing the Most Significant Changes (MSC) monitoring system in ADRA country offices.

18. Kivunja, C. (2013) ‘Qualitative Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Using Leximancer Digital Software’, Lecture Notes on Information Theory 1(1): 53-55.

19. Kozma, R.B. (2005). Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT for Education Impact: A Review. In: D.A. Wagner, B. Day, T.James, R.B Kozma, J.Miller and T.Unwin (Eds.), *Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects. A Handbook for Developing Countries* (pp. 11-18). Washington, DC: infoDev/World Bank. Retrieved March 24, 2012 from http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.9.html.

20. M. Rosenberg, Society and the adolescent self-image (rev. ed.), vol. xxxii. Middletown, CT, England: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.

21. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative analysis and interpretation. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3, 431-539.

22. Sen, A. 1999. *Development as Freedom*. Oxford University Press.

23. Sey, A., Bar, F., Coward, C., Koepke, L., Rothschild, C., & Sciadas, G. (2015). There When You Need It: The Multiple Dimensions of Public Access ICT Uses and Impacts. *Information Technologies & International Development*, 11(1), pp-71.

24. Sey, A., Coward, C., Bar, F., Sciadas, G., Rothschild, C., & Koepke, L. (2013). Connecting people for development: Why public access ICTs matter.

25. Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M., S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research methods, 38(2), 262-279

26. Ssozi-Mugarura, F., Rivett, U., & Blake, E. (2016, June). Using Activity Theory to Understand Technology Use and Perception among Rural Users in Uganda. In *Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development* (p. 13). ACM.

27. Tabassum, G., & Yeo, A. W. (2015, May). Measurement of tangible and intangible impacts of Telecentres on rural communities. In *Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development* (p. 61). ACM.

28. Tarawe, J., & Harris, R. W. (2009). Stories from e-Bario. Living the Information Society in Asia, 365, 109.

29. URL: http://info.leximancer.com/

30. URL: https://www.google.com/search?q=Boosterism&oq=Boosterism&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i59l3j0l 2.1304j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

31. Zaitseva, E. (2012). How to make sense of the Leximancer analysis. Liverpool John Moores UniversityAcademic Enhancement Unit, 5th Floor, Kingsway House, Hatton Garden, Liverpool, L3 2AJ