# The TOTUM-63 Supplement and High-Intensity Interval Training Combination Limits Weight Gain, Improves Glycemic Control, and Influences the Composition of Gut Mucosa-Associated Bacteria in Rats on a High Fat Diet

Marine Dupuit, Vivien Chavanelle, Benoit Chassaing, Fanny Perriere, Monique Etienne, Claire Plissonneau, Audrey Boscaro, Nicolas Barnich, Vincent Pialoux, Thierry Maugard, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Marine Dupuit, Vivien Chavanelle, Benoit Chassaing, Fanny Perriere, Monique Etienne, et al. The TOTUM-63 Supplement and High-Intensity Interval Training Combination Limits Weight Gain, Improves Glycemic Control, and Influences the Composition of Gut Mucosa-Associated Bacteria in Rats on a High Fat Diet. Nutrients, 2021, 13 (5), pp.1-24. 10.3390/nu13051569. hal-03220475

HAL Id: hal-03220475

https://uca.hal.science/hal-03220475

Submitted on 7 May 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# The TOTUM-63 Supplement and High-Intensity Interval Training Combination Limits Weight Gain, Improves Glycemic Control, and Influences the Composition of Gut Mucosa-Associated Bacteria in Rats on a High Fat Diet

Marine Dupuit<fnref n="1" />, Vivien Chavanelle<fnref n="2" />, Benoit Chassaing<fnref n="3" /> ID, Fanny Perriere<fnref n="4" />, Monique Etienne<fnref n="1" />, Claire Plissonneau<fnref n="1" />, Audrey Boscaro<fnref n="1" />, Nicolas Barnich<fnref n="5" /> ID, Vincent Pialoux<fnref n="6" />, Thierry Maugard<fnref n="7" /> ID, Florian Le Joubioux<fnref n="8" />, Sébastien Peltier<fnref n="8" />, Pascal Sirvent<fnref n="2" />, Yolanda F. Otero<fnref n="2" /> and Nathalie Boisseau <fnref n="1" />,* ID

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Dupuit, M.; Chavanelle, V.; Chassaing, B.; Perriere, F.; Etienne, M.; Plissonneau, C.; Boscaro, A.; Barnich, N.; Pialoux, V.; Maugard, T.; et al. The TOTUM-63 Supplement and High-Intensity Interval Training Combination Limits Weight Gain, Improves Glycemic Control, and Influences the Composition of Gut Mucosa-Associated Bacteria in Rats on a High Fat Diet. *Nutrients* **2021**, *13*, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051569

Academic Editor: Antonio Brunetti

Received: 7 April 2021

Accepted: 2 May 2021

Published: 7 May 2021

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** Obesity and prediabetes are the two strongest risk factors of type 2 diabetes. It has been reported that TOTUM-63, a polyphenol-rich plant extract, has beneficial effects on body weight (BW) and insulin resistance in mice fed a high fat diet (HFD). The study aim was to determine whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and/or TOTUM-63 supplementation improved body composition and glycemic control and gut microbiota composition in a Western diet-induced obesity rat model. Wistar rats received a standard diet (CTRL; control; *n* = 12) or HFD (HFD; *n* = 48) for 16 weeks. Then, HFD rats were divided in four groups: HFD, HFD + TOTUM-63 (T63), HFD + HIIT (HIIT), and HFD + HIIT + T63 (HIIT + T63). Training was performed 4 days/week for 12 weeks. TOTUM-63 was included in diet composition (2%). The HIIT + T63 combination significantly limited BW gain, without any energy intake modulation, and improved glycemic control. BW variation was correlated with increased α-diversity of the colon mucosa microbiota in the HIIT + T63 group. Moreover, the relative abundance of *Anaeroplasma*, *Christensenellaceae* and *Oscillospira* was higher in the HIIT + T63 group. Altogether, these results suggest that the HIIT and TOTUM-63 combination could be proposed for the management of obesity and prediabetes.

**Keywords:** high-intensity interval training; plant extract supplementation; glycemic control; body composition; microbiota

## 1. Introduction

Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) prevalence has been increasing worldwide in the last decades [1]. Overweight/obesity and prediabetes (a non-pathological stage characterized by increased

<footnote n="1">¹ Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques (AME2P), Université Clermont Auvergne, CRNH Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; marine.dupuit@uca.fr (M.D.); monique.etienne@uca.fr (M.E.); claire.plissonneau@uca.fr (C.P.); audrey.boscaro@uca.fr (A.B.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Valbiotis R&D, Riom Center, 63200 Riom, France; Vivien.Chavanelle@valbiotis.com (V.C.); pascal.sirvent@valbiotis.com (P.S.); yolanda.otero@valbiotis.com (Y.F.O.)</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Inserm U1016, Team "Mucosal Microbiota in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases", Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 8104, 75014 Paris, France; benoit.chassaing@inserm.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Laboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement (LMGE), Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; fanny.perriere@uca.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Microbes, Intestin, Inflammation et Susceptibilité de l’Hôte (M2iSH), UMR 1071 Inserm, USC-INRAE 2018, Université Clermont Auvergne, CRNH Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; nicolas.barnich@uca.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de la Biologie et de la Motricité (LIBM), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EA 7424, 69266 Villeurbane, France; vincent.pialoux@univ-lyon1.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="7">7 UMR 7266 CNRS-ULR, LIENSs, Equipe BCBS, La Rochelle Université, 17042 La Rochelle, France; thierry.maugard@univ-lr.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="8">8 Valbiotis R&D, La Rochelle Center, 17000 La Rochelle, France; florian.lejoubioux@valbiotis.com (F.L.J.); sebastien.peltier@valbiotis.com (S.P.)</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: Nathalie.BOISSEAU@uca.fr; Tel.: +33-4-73-40-55-19</footnote>
fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose and/or elevated hemoglobin A1c [2]) are the two strongest risk factors of T2D development [3]. Indeed, 5–10% of patients with prediabetes typically progress to T2D each year [4], and 70% will develop T2D during their lifetime [5]. Obesity, which is characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue and large (intra-)abdominal fat mass (FM), is correlated with insulin resistance [6], and increases by 95% the risk of T2D [7]. Thus, preventing and treating prediabetes and obesity are relevant strategies for avoiding or slowing down T2D.

Lifestyle interventions, including diet and/or physical activity programs, may help in this context. The American College of Sports Medicine has recommended low- to moderate-intensity continuous training for patients with obesity and (pre)diabetes [8]. Currently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), which includes repeated bouts of high-intensity effort followed by varied recovery times [9], is considered a time-efficient and safe strategy to reduce total FM, particularly intra-abdominal FM [10,11]. Moreover, many studies have reported glucose homeostasis improvement following HIIT programs [12–14]. HIIT effects on glycemic control could be partly explained by an increase in the skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and higher glucose transport activity [15]. In addition, a growing body of evidence suggests that combining HIIT and nutritional strategies (such as plant extract supplementations) may result in more favorable outcomes by enhancing energy metabolism, or by increasing the adaptive response during recovery [16].

TOTUM-63 (T63) is a polyphenol-rich extract obtained from five plants (olive leaves, bilberry, artichoke, chrysanthellum, and black pepper) and designed to reduce T2D risk factors. T63 has positive effects on body composition and whole-body glucose homeostasis in high fat diet (HFD)-fed mice [17]. In these mice, addition of T63 in the food for 16 weeks prevents diet-induced excessive weight and FM gains and limits the HFD effects on glucose homeostasis. Specifically, fasting insulin levels were reduced, the insulin response to an oral glucose challenge was improved, and insulin-stimulated AKT phosphorylation in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue was restored [17]. In humans, T63 shows good tolerability and safety, and T63 supplementation for 4 weeks (5g·d⁻¹) improves the response to an oral carbohydrate tolerance test. This suggests that T63 is a promising candidate for glucose management.

T63 also shows beneficial effects on gut microbiota, by partially restoring the α and β diversity index and by improving bacterial taxonomy in mice [17]. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been proposed as a possible contributor to obesity and metabolic diseases, such as T2D [18]. Therefore, improving intestinal microbiota could be an innovative therapeutic target for diabetes prevention [19]. Gut microbiota composition and function are influenced by regular physical activity and diet interventions [20]. Furthermore, several authors suggest that physical activity effects on gut microbiota composition and function could improve glycemic control in subjects with (pre)-diabetes [19]. Physical activity could restore gut microbiota equilibrium by enhancing the number of beneficial bacteria and simultaneously reducing pathogenic bacteria and by improving microbiota diversity [21].

On the basis of these data, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 12-week intervention program that included physical activity (HIIT) and/or T63 supplementation on body composition and glycemic control in a rodent model of obesity. We first hypothesized that HIIT and T63 would positively affect whole body FM and whole body glucose homeostasis, and that their combination (HIIT + T63) might induce greater positive effects. We also hypothesized that each intervention could specifically affect the mucosa-associated gut microbiota composition (α and β diversity), with more favorable adaptations in the HIIT + T63 group. A better understanding of the effects of physical activity, T63 consumption, and their potential interaction will help to develop personalized intervention strategies to reduce adiposity and glucose homeostasis impairment and ultimately T2D development.
## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animals Characteristics

The required sample size (n = 8 animals/group) was calculated on the basis of the main outcome (glycemic control) with a statistical significance of <0.05, power of 0.8, and assuming a variance of 25% in the outcome of interest. Additional animals were added in each group to account for the refusal to exercise by some rats (about 10–20%). This led to a total of 60 male Wistar rats (Charles River, France). Rats (8 weeks of age) were housed in individual cages in controlled conditions (22 ± 1 °C; 12-h light/12-h dark cycle). All experiments were approved by the local ethics committee (C2EA-02, Auvergne, France; APAFIS 15853-2018070413182792), and were performed in accordance with the animal welfare regulations and guidelines (European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and scientific purposes). All efforts were made to protect animal welfare and to minimize suffering at each protocol step.

### 2.2. Intervention

After one week of acclimation, animals were distributed in two dietary groups (food ad libitum): high-fat diet (HFD, n = 48; 45% of kcal from fat) (#D12451, Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA), and standard diet (CTRL, n = 12; 10% of kcal from fat) (#D12450H, Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA). After 16 weeks of obesity induction, animals in the HFD group were divided in four groups matched for body weight (BW), fat mass (FM) and fasting glycemia: (i) HFD alone (HFD group), (ii) HFD + HIIT (HIIT group), (iii) HFD + T63 supplementation (T63 group), and (iv) HFD + HIIT + T63 (HIIT + T63 group). T63 was added to the HFD at a dose of 2% (#D18091303, Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA) The T63 supplement contains extracts from olive leaves (*Olea europaea*), bilberry (*Vaccinium myrtillus*), artichoke (*Cynara scolymus*), chrysanthellum (*Chrysanthellum indicum* subsp. *afroamericanum* B.L. Turner) and black pepper (*Piper nigrum*). Table 1 summarizes T63 chemical characterization with the estimated total polyphenols and total fibers and the quantification of all other potential compounds of interest. The intervention was implemented for 12 weeks, from week 16 to week 28 (Figure 1).

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Chemical characterization of whole TOTUM-63 powder. Reprinted with permission from ref. [17] Copyright 2021 VALBIOTIS.</caption><thead><tr><th>Compound Type</th><th>Extract Content (g/100 g Dry Weight)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Total polyphenols</td><td>14.36</td></tr><tr><td>Total anthocyanins</td><td>0.81</td></tr><tr><td>Monocaffeoylquinic acids</td><td>1.18</td></tr><tr><td>Chlorogenic acid</td><td>0.85</td></tr><tr><td>Other monocaffeoylquinic acids</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>Dicaffeoylquinic acids</td><td>0.98</td></tr><tr><td>Cynarin</td><td>0.24</td></tr><tr><td>Other dicaffeoylquinic acids</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>Caffeic acid</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Oleuropein</td><td>3.72</td></tr><tr><td>Oleuropein isomers</td><td>0.20</td></tr><tr><td>Hydroxytyrosol</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Luteolin</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Luteolin-7-O-glucoside</td><td>0.38</td></tr><tr><td>Luteolin-7-O-glucuronide</td><td>0.38</td></tr><tr><td>Apigenin</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Apigenin-7-O-glucoside</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Apigenin-7-O-glucuronide</td><td>0.25</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** *Cont.*</caption><thead><tr><th>Compound Type</th><th>Extract Content (g/100 g Dry Weight)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Apigenin-6-C-glucoside-8-C-arabinoside (shaftoside)</td><td>0.06</td></tr><tr><td>Apigenin-6,8-C-diglucoside (vicenin 2)</td><td>0.06</td></tr><tr><td>Eriodictyol</td><td>&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Eriodictyol-7-O-glucoside</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td>Okanin-4-O-glucoside (marein)</td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Isokanin-7-O-glucoside (flavanomarein)</td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Maritimetin-6-O-glucoside (maritimein)</td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Saponins</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Chrysantellin A</td><td>0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Chrysantellin B</td><td>0.27</td></tr><tr><td>Alkaloids</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Piperine</td><td>0.004</td></tr><tr><td>Fibers</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Soluble fibers</td><td>13.7</td></tr><tr><td>Insoluble fibers</td><td>3.3</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Study design. Rats were randomized in two groups: control (CTRL; *n* = 12) and High-Fat Diet (HFD; *n* = 48) for 16 weeks (obesity induction). Then, the HFD group was divided in four groups (*n* = 12/group) matched for weight, fat mass and fasting blood glucose: HFD, TOTUM-63 (T63), High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), and HIIT + T63 (intervention period for 12 weeks). In the HIIT and HIIT + T63 groups, “no runner” rats were excluded from the study. Two rats from the T63 group died during glucose gavage due to intubation mishandling. Finally, 41 rats were included in the analysis (HFD: *n* = 12; T63: *n* = 10; HIIT: *n* = 10 and HIIT + T63: *n* = 9).</figcaption></figure>
Rats were euthanized after isoflurane anesthesia by exsanguination through cardiac puncture. Blood, skeletal muscle (i.e., gastrocnemius and soleus), white adipose tissues (i.e., epididymal, mesenteric and subcutaneous), brown adipose tissue, colon, cecal content, and liver were collected and stored appropriately for later analysis. Samples were collected at least 72 h after the last exercise session to avoid any interference of physical exercise acute effects on the analyses.

## 2.3. Food Consumption, Body Weight and Body Composition

Food consumption (g) and BW (g) were assessed three times per week. Food consumption corresponded the difference between the weight of the food given and the weight of the unconsumed food. This value and the energy values of each diet were used to calculate the energy intake (kCal). FM and lean body mass (LBM) were measured with an EchoMRI device (EchoMRI Medical System, Houston, TX, USA) every four weeks.

## 2.4. Training Protocol

Rats in the HIIT (n = 12) and HIIT + T63 (n = 12) groups underwent a 10-day acclimation on a treadmill (Matsport, France) during which speed and running time were progressively increased. Then, rats performed the 12-week HIIT program, 4 days per week, as follows: 6 × (3 min at 10 m·min⁻¹/4 min at 18 m·min⁻¹), for a total of 42 min/training session.

## 2.5. Fasting Glycemia, Fasting Insulinemia, and Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed at week 1, 16 and 28. Briefly, after 6h of fasting, the baseline glucose level (t = 0 min) was measured in tail vein blood (approximately 2 µL) using a standard glucose meter (Accu Check Performa®, Roche Diabetes Care, Montbonnot-Saint-Martin, France) to determine the fasting glycemia. Then, rats received glucose by gavage (2 g·kg⁻¹ of lean body mass), and glucose concentration was measured in blood samples collected from the tail vein at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the oral glucose load. The total area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoidal method. The plasma concentration of insulin was measured with a commercial ELISA kit (Alpco, Salem, NH, USA) in tail blood samples at 0 (i.e., fasting insulinemia), 30 and 120 min after the oral glucose load. The Insulin-Resistance index (HOMA-IR) was determined with the following formula: $HOMA-IR = (fasting insulinemia (µU·mL⁻¹) × fasting glycemia (mM))/22.5$ [22].

## 2.6. Citrate Synthase Activity

Citrate synthase activity, a marker of muscle oxidative activity [23], was measured in soleus and gastrocnemius muscle homogenates according to the method described by Stephenson et al. [24].

## 2.7. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Protein lysates from frozen soleus, gastrocnemius and colon were prepared using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.50% sodium deoxycholate, 0.10% sodium dodecyl sulfate, pH: 8.0) supplemented with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA) and phosphatase inhibitor tablets (#88667 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Tissues were homogenized on ice using a glass Potter homogenizer followed by 1h incubation at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min (+4 °C), and supernatants were collected. The supernatant protein content was determined using the commercial DC protein assay (Bio-Rad, USA). Western blotting was performed as described by Chavanelle et al. [25] with the following modifications. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) (IF8) (1:1000; Cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), and OXPHOS complexes (1:4000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). After incubation, membranes were washed three times with tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween 20
(TTBS) and incubated with the appropriate dilutions of anti-species horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Then, membranes were washed three times in TTBS before addition of the enhanced chemiluminescent solution (Clarity Western ECL; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for 5 min, using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc system. Band densities were determined using Image Lab V5.0 (Bio-Rad, USA). The Stain Free® (Bio-Rad, USA) total protein measurement was used as loading control and for data normalization [26].

## 2.8. RNA Isolation, Reverse Transcription and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from muscles (30 mg), colon (50–60 mg), and adipose tissue (50–60 mg) using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). In adipose tissue, total RNA was purified with the NucleoSpin® RNA Set (Marchey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France). cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg RNA with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). The relative expression of *Il1β*, *IL6*, *IL10*, *Tnfa*, *Ppargc1α* and *Nrf1* were evaluated by real-time PCR amplification using the CFX Bio-Rad system with SYBR® Green probe sets (Applied Biosystems, Beverly, MA, USA) (primer sequences in Table 2). Results were normalized to the expression level of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (*Gapdh*), and gene expression was quantified with the ΔΔCt method. Data are presented using the Rq normalized to the control group, or Rq = 2⁻ΔΔCt (ΔCt = Ct (target) – Ct (Gapdh); ΔΔCt = ΔCt (sample) – ΔCt (control)).

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Primers used for real-time PCR analyses. IL, interleukin; *Tnfa*, tumor necrosis factors-α; *Ppargc1α*, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1 α; *Nrf1*, nuclear respiratory factor 1; *Gapdh*, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.</caption><thead><tr><th>Genes</th><th>Forward Primer 5' → 3'</th><th>Reverse Primer 5' → 3'</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><i>Il1β</i></td><td>ATCTCACAGCAGCATCTCGA</td><td>TAGCAGGTCGTCATCATCCC</td></tr><tr><td><i>Il6</i></td><td>CCACTGCCTTCCCTACTTCA</td><td>TTCTGACAGTGCATCATCGC</td></tr><tr><td><i>Il10</i></td><td>AGAGAACCATGGCCCAGAAA</td><td>TGAGTGTCACGTAGGCTTCT</td></tr><tr><td><i>Tnfa</i></td><td>TCATCCGTTCTCTACCCAGC</td><td>TACTTCAGCGTCTCGTGTGT</td></tr><tr><td><i>Ppargc1α</i></td><td>AATGCAGCGGTCTTAGCACT</td><td>GTGTGAGGAGGGTCATCGTT</td></tr><tr><td><i>Nrf1</i></td><td>TTCCTCAGCCTCCGTCTTCT</td><td>ACACACCTTGCACTCACACC</td></tr><tr><td><i>Gapdh</i></td><td>CATGCCATCACTGCCACTCA</td><td>GCGGCATGTCAGATCCACAA</td></tr></tbody></table>

## 2.9. Other Biochemical Analyses

Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) were determined in plasma, liver, gastrocnemius and epididymal adipose tissue samples, as described by [27]. Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins (oxLDL) were measured in plasma using an ELISA kit (Elabscience®, Houston, TX, USA) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. SuperOxide Dismutase (SOD), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx) and catalase activities were determined in plasma, liver, muscle and epididymal adipose tissue, as described by Groussard et al. [27].

Plasma myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration was measured using a commercial ELISA kit (Myeloperoxidase DuoSet ELISA, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Plasma lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) was quantified with the LBP ELISA Kit for various species (Hycult Biotech, Frontstraat, Uden, The Netherlands), following the manufacturer's instructions.
## 2.10. Concentration of Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) by Gas Chromatography

Weighed fecal samples were ground with Milli-Q® water (500 µL for 100 mg), incubated at 4 °C for 2 h, and centrifuged at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min. Supernatants were weighted, and saturated phosphotungstic acid solution was added (1 g for 100 µL). After overnight incubation at 4 °C, samples were centrifuged again, and SCFAs (acetate, butyrate and propionate) concentration were determined by gas chromatography (Agilent Technologies™ 6850, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using DB-FFAP columns (30 m × 250 µm, 0.25 µm). The temperature of the inlet was 250 °C and the injection volume was 1 µL. The temperature program was as follows: initial oven temperature: 100 °C, ramped to 250 °C (10 °C·min⁻¹), and held for 5 min. The carrier gas was helium at a constant flow of 0.7 mL·min⁻¹. Samples were imported into the column using the split mode at a ratio of 10:1. Detection was performed with the flame ionization detector.

## 2.11. Microbiota Composition Analysis by Illumina Sequencing

Genomic DNA from colon samples was lysed in proteinase K at 56 °C in a shaking incubator overnight. DNA was extracted using the Nucleospin® Tissue Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France). DNA concentration was determined with a QubitTM Fluorometer (Invitrogen), and DNA quality (260/280 and 260/230 ratios) was assessed with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific, Courtaboeuf, France). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq technology and the Earth Microbiome Project protocol with some slight modifications in collaboration with the "Mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases" research group (Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR 8104, Université de Paris, France). Briefly, region V4 of the 16S rRNA gene was PCR-amplified from each sample using composite forward and reverse primers designed with the Golay error-correcting scheme, and used to tag the PCR products [28]. The sequence of the forward primer (515F) was: 5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACGCTXXXXXXXXXXXTATGGTAATTGTGTGCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3'. The italicized sequence is the 5' Illumina adapter, the 12 X sequence is the Golay barcode, the bold sequence is the primer pad, the italicized and bold sequence is the primer linker, and the underlined sequence is the conserved bacterial primer 515F. The sequence of the reverse primer (806R) was: 5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATAGTCAGCCAGCCGGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3'. The italicized sequence is the 3' reverse complement sequence of the Illumina adapter, the bold sequence is the primer pad, the italicized and bold sequence is the primer linker, and the underlined sequence is the conserved bacterial primer 806R. PCR reactions included the Hot Master PCR mix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA), 0.2 mM of each primer, and 10-100 ng template. The reaction conditions were 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 60 s at 50 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C on a BioRad thermocycler. PCR products were quantified with the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay. Then, a master DNA pool was generated from the purified products in equimolar ratios and purified with Ampure magnetic purification beads (Agencourt, Brea, CA, USA). The pooled product was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay and then sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer (paired-end reads, 2 × 250 bp) at Cornell University, Ithaca.

Using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) version 2019.7, 16S rRNA sequences were analyzed [29]. Sequences were demultiplexed and quality-filtered using the Dada2 method [30] with QIIME2 default parameters to detect and correct Illumina amplicon sequence data, and a table of QIIME2 artifacts was generated. Then, the α-diversity of bacterial communities was assessed by calculating the Shannon's diversity index based on the number of observed operational taxonomic units (OTU). β-diversity was used to analyze the dissimilarity among the group membership and structure. Therefore, at 9103 sequencing depth, based weighted/unweighted UniFrac distances were reported according to the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Group differences in α and β-diversity indices were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), respectively. For
taxonomy analysis, features were assigned to OTUs with a 99% threshold of pairwise identity to the Greengenes reference database 13.8 [31]. Differential taxon abundance among groups was tested with ANCOM [32]. The W-value generated by ANCOM is a count of the number of sub-hypotheses (Aitchison's log-ratio) that are significantly different across the tested groups for a given taxon. Correlations between gut microbiota composition (the relative abundance of features) and body or glycemic parameters were calculated with the Spearman's correlation and the GraphPad Prism software (version 7.0).

## 2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistica software (version 12.0). All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normality was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test, and homogeneity of variance was assessed with the Bartlett F-test. In the absence of normal distribution or variance homoscedasticity, data were log-transformed before analysis. One-way-ANOVA with the Newman Keuls's post-hoc test was used to compare the CTRL and HFD groups (effects of obesity induction). Then, one-way ANOVA (with or without repeated measures) followed by the Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used to determine group effects, and time (T), group (G) and $T \times G$ interactions in the four experimental groups (HFD, T63, HIIT and HIIT + T63). Spearman correlations were used to test relationships between variables. Differences were considered significant when *p*-values < 0.05. For easy comparison, the CTRL group values during the intervention period are presented with a gray dotted line/bar in the figures.

# 3. Results

## 3.1. HFD for 16 Weeks Significantly Alters Body Composition in Wistar Rats

After 16 weeks of ad libitum HFD, BW and total FM (g and %) were significantly increased in the HFD compared with the CTRL group (*p* < 0.05, Figure 2A,B) without difference in LBM (*p* = 0.29) (Figure 2C). Despite the significant body composition changes, fasting glycemia and insulinemia and glucose tolerance were similar in the HFD and CTRL groups (Figure 2D–G).

After the 16-week induction period, animals in the HFD group were divided in four homogeneous groups (*n* = 12) matched for BW and FM (Figure 1). The 12 rats in the HFD group became the control group to assess the effect of training and/or T63 supplementation during the next 12 weeks.

## 3.2. The T63-HIIT Combination Limits Body Weight and Fat Mass Gain, Independently of the Energy Intake

The mean energy intake during the 12-week intervention was not different in the four groups (Figure 3A). At the end of the intervention, BW change (%) was lower in the HIIT + T63 group (Figure 3B). Interestingly, BW change (%) was comparable in the HIIT and HIIT + T63 groups until week 24, but only the HIIT and T63 association allowed limiting BW gain in the last four weeks (Figure 3C). At the end of the intervention, FM gain (% of change) was lower in the HIIT groups (HIIT + T63 vs. HFD and T63 groups: *p* = 0.028 and *p* = 0.016, respectively; HIIT vs. T63: *p* = 0.046; HIIT vs. HFD: *p* = 0.053) (Figure 3D). Conversely, LBM and epididymal AT were comparable in the four groups (Figure 3E,F).
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Effect of obesity induction on body weight (BW) (A), total fat mass (FM) (B), total lean body mass (LBM) (C), fasting glycemia (D), fasting insulinemia (E), blood glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (F) and total area under the curve of glucose (AUC~glucose~) (G). \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005, \*\*\* *p* < 0.0005. G: group effect, T: time effect, G × T: group × time effect. CTRL: control group, HFD: high-fat diet.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Mean energy intake in the four groups (A). Changes in body weight (ΔBW) (B,C), fat mass (ΔFM) (D), lean body mass (LBM) (E), and epididymal adipose tissue (AT) (F) at the end of the 12-week intervention. \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005: HFD vs. T63, \*\*\* *p* < 0.005: HIIT vs. T63, \*\*\*\* *p* < 0.005, \*\*\*\*\* *p* < 0.0005: HIIT vs. HFD, \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005: HIIT + T63 vs. T63, \*\# *p* < 0.05, \*\*\# *p* < 0.005: HIIT + T63 vs. HFD. ΔBW = ((Week 28 BW – Week 16 BW)/Week 16 BW) × 100; ΔFM = ((Week 28 FM – Week 16 FM)/Week 16 FM) × 100, G: group effect, T: time effect, G × T: group × time effect.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.3. The HIIT-T63 Combination Improves Glycemic Control

After 12 weeks of intervention (supplementation and/or physical training), fasting glycemia and insulinemia were comparable among groups, leading to similar HOMA-IR values (Figure 4). A significant group effect was observed for the blood glucose values during OGTT between the HIIT + T63 and HFD groups ($p = 0.025$, Figure 4D). Similarly, the $AUC_{glucose}$ value was lower in the HIIT + T63 than in the HFD group, indicating that the T63 and HIIT combination improved glycemic control (Figure 4E). A trend was only observed when comparing the HIIT and HFD groups ($p = 0.07$). The insulin response was not different among groups (Figure 4F,G).

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on (i) Fasting glycemia (A), Fasting insulinemia (B), and HOMA-IR (C) and on (ii) blood glucose (D,E), and insulin (F,G) levels during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). \* *p* < 0.05. AUC: area under the curve, G: group effect, T: time effect, $G \times T$: group × time effect.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.4. The HIIT-T63 Combination Improves Muscle Oxidative Metabolism

The GLUT4 protein level in the soleus muscle was not different among groups, although it tended to be higher in rats undergoing training (Figure 5A). Citrate synthase activity was significantly higher in the HIIT + T63 than in all the other groups (*p* < 0.05) (Figure 5B). Western blot analysis showed a significant global increase in the total amount of OXPHOS complex proteins (Figure 5C) in the two HIIT groups vs. the T63 group (group effect: *p* < 0.05), and in the HIIT vs. HFD group (*p* = 0.025). The difference was not significant between the HIIT + T63 and HFD groups (*p* = 0.053). No difference among groups was observed in gastrocnemius samples (Supplementary Figure S1).

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on GLUT4 protein content (A), citrate synthase (CS) activity (B), and OXPHOS complex protein content (C) in soleus. \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005, \*\*\* *p* < 0.0005, G: group effect, T: time effect, G × T: group × time effect.</figcaption></figure>

No change was observed in the expression of *Ppargc1a* and *Nrf1*, two genes encoding regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis (Supplementary Figure S2).
### 3.5. T63 Supplementation and/or HIIT Enhances the Pro-/Anti-Oxidant Balance in Plasma

T63 supplementation and/or HIIT decreased HFD-induced oxidative stress, as shown by the lower oxLDL values (Figure 6A). AOPP concentration was not different among groups, although values were lower in the HIIT + T63 group (Figure 6B). Plasma SOD activity was higher only in the HIIT + T63 group ($p = 0.025$ vs. HFD) (Figure 6C), and plasma GPX activity was higher in the HIIT + 63 and HFD groups compared with the HIIT group ($p = 0.003$ and $p = 0.042$, respectively) (Figure 6D). No change was observed in the other tissues examined (gastrocnemius, adipose tissue and liver) (Supplementary Figure S3).

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) (A), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) (B), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (C), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity (D) in plasma. \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005, G: group effect.</figcaption></figure>
In plasma, MPO and LBP values were not different among groups (Supplementary Figure S4). Expression of the *Il10*, *Il1β* and *Il6* genes in colon, epididymal adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue was comparable among groups. *Il10* was not detected in subcutaneous adipose tissue and its expression levels in colon and epididymal adipose tissue were similar among groups (Supplementary Figure S5)

### 3.6. T63 and HIIT Differently Modulate the Intestinal Mucosa-Associated Microbiota

Analysis of the composition of the colonic mucosa microbiota by 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the α-diversity (Shannon diversity index) was different among groups (*p* = 0.034), and was significantly increased in the HIIT + T63 group (*p* = 0.023 and *p* = 0.002 vs the HFD and HIIT groups, respectively) (Figure 7A). Interestingly, the Shannon index was negatively correlated with BW variations (ΔBW) (Figure 7B), suggesting an association between rich microbiota and protection against metabolic deregulation.

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Mucosa-associated microbiota composition analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in colon DNA samples (Illumina MiSeq system). Shannon index (A), correlation between Shannon index and body weight change (%) (ΔBW) (B). Unweighted Unifrac analysis clustered in four groups (C) and two groups (T63 and no T63) (D), G: group effect. \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005.</figcaption></figure>
β-diversity analysis through computation by PCoA of unweighted Unifrac distance matrices highlighted two main clusters based on the presence/absence of T63 supplementation (Figure 7C,D). Indeed, although β-diversity was different between the HIIT and HFD groups, T63 displayed the main effect on the composition of the mucosa-associated microbiota (p = 0.001 for T63 vs. HIIT; p = 0.001 for HIIT + T63 vs. HIIT and HFD), demonstrating the ability of the T63 extract to modulate the mucosa-associated colonic microbiota.

The HIIT and T63 combination may differently influence metabolites or specific features compared with HIIT and T63 alone. As SCFAs are derived from the microbiota, major SCFAs (acetate, butyrate and propionate) were quantified in fecal samples to evaluate the microbiota global fermentative-metabolic capacity. Their concentrations and the total SCFA amount (acetate + butyrate + propionate) were similar among groups after the 12-week intervention (Table 3).

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Fecal acetate, butyrate and propionate concentration (µmol·g⁻¹ feces) at the end of intervention period. SCFAs, Short chain fatty acids; Total SCFAs = acetate + butyrate + propionate.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>HFD</th><th>T63</th><th>HIIT</th><th>HIIT+T63</th><th>p</th><th>η<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Acetate</td><td>26.1 ± 4.3</td><td>22.5 ± 5.6</td><td>26.7 ± 7.1</td><td>23.5 ± 3.1</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td>Butyrate</td><td>2.1 ± 1.0</td><td>2.1 ± 1.4</td><td>3.1 ± 1.9</td><td>1.6 ± 0.6</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Propionate</td><td>2.4 ± 0.8</td><td>2.2 ± 0.9</td><td>2.8 ± 1.7</td><td>1.9 ± 0.3</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>Total SCFAs</td><td>30.8 ± 5.5</td><td>26.8 ± 7.3</td><td>32.5 ± 9.9</td><td>27.1 ± 3.7</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.12</td></tr></tbody></table>

At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the most abundant in all groups (their combined mean abundance represented 88% of all microbiota). The Tenericutes phylum was more abundant in the HIIT groups (p < 0.0005), especially in the HIIT + T63 group (Figure 8A). No other global phylum difference was found. At the family level, *Anaeroplasmaceae* was more abundant in the HIIT groups and particularly in the HIIT + T63 group (Figure 8B). Interestingly, the ANCOM statistical analysis highlighted significant group differences. Specifically, the relative abundance of *Anaeroplasma* and *Christensenellaceae* was higher in the HIIT than in the HFD and T63 groups, and in the HIIT + T63 group compared with HIIT alone (p < 0.05) (Figure 8C,D). Finally, *Oscillospira* relative abundance was significantly higher in the HIIT + T63 group than in the others (p < 0.0005) (Figure 8E). The relative abundance of specific microbiota components was correlated with the body composition and glucose homeostasis parameters. BW and FM gains and ΔBW and ΔFM were negatively correlated with *Christensenellaceae* relative abundance. Only FM gain and ΔFM were negatively associated with *Anaeroplasma*. ΔBW tended to be negatively correlated with *Anaeroplasma* (p = 0.06) and *Oscillospira* (p = 0.07) relative abundance (Figure 9A). Moreover, fasting insulinemia and HOMA-IR were negatively associated with *Oscillospira* relative abundance (Figure 9B). Conversely, citrate synthase activity was positively associated with the abundance of all three bacterial groups, and GLUT4 protein expression with *Christensenellaceae* and *Anaeroplasma* abundance.
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Taxonomy at the phylum (A) and family (B) levels for the four groups. Relative abundance (%) of specific bacterial types in the mucosa-associated microbiota at the end of the 12-week intervention (C–E) * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005, G: group effect.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** Heat map showing the association of the abundance of the indicated microbiota components with body composition (A), and glucose homeostasis parameters (B). \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005, \*\*\* *p* < 0.005. BW: body weight; FM: fat mass; Δ: delta; AUC: area under the curve; CS: citrate synthase.</figcaption></figure>

**4. Discussion**

The aim of this study was to determine whether HIIT, combined with T63 supplementation or not, alters body composition and glycemic profile in a rat model of pre-obesity, specifically by modulating intestinal mucosa-associated microbiota. In our experimental conditions, the HIIT + T63 combination significantly limited BW gain, without any energy intake modulation, and improved glycemic control. BW variation was correlated with the α-diversity of the colon mucosa microbiota that was more important in the HIIT + T63 group. Moreover, the relative abundance of *Anaeroplasmaceae*, *Christensenellaceae* and *Oscillospira* was higher in the HIIT + T63 group.

The etiologies of obesity and prediabetes are very complex, due to the multiplicity of genetic and environmental determinants. However, dietary habits, sedentary time and physical inactivity play a major role in their increasing frequency. In this study, we chose a model of obesity induced by a Western-style diet rather than a genetic model, to better mimic our current lifestyle. Indeed, the Western diet, defined by high dietary intake of saturated fats and sucrose and low intake of fibers, contributes to the increased occurrence of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes and obesity [33].

Diet intervention and/or physical activity programs are necessary to fight against obesity and (pre)diabetes [34,35]. As nutritional strategy, we supplemented rats with T63,
a polyphenol-rich natural supplement based on five plant extracts designed to reduce T2D risk factors. Concerning physical activity, a growing body of evidence in humans and rodents shows that HIIT is a more interesting strategy than Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) for total and (intra-) abdominal FM reduction [36–38] and glucose control improvement [14,39]. In the study by Maillard et al. [38], Zucker rats performed the same HIIT protocol (6 × (3 min at 10 m·min⁻¹/4 min at 18 m·min⁻¹)), but only for 10 weeks, with significant body composition changes. In the present study, we added two additional weeks of training for two reasons. First, First, De Araujo et al. [40] defined short-term and long-term HIIT programs in function of their duration (<6 weeks and ≥12 weeks, respectively). Furthermore, nutritional supplementation-induced gut microbiota modulation is observed after at least 2 weeks of treatment and generally lasts less than 24 weeks [41–44]. Therefore, 12 weeks seemed a good compromise to obtain significant body composition and gut microbiota alterations, and was recently chosen also by Plissonneau et al. [45] with the same HIIT protocol.

The HIIT program alone limited BW gain up to week 24 (i.e. week 7 of the intervention period), suggesting that HIIT was effective, at least at the beginning of the intervention. After this period, it could no longer compensate the adverse effect of HFD, but was still efficient when associated with T63. Moreover, T63 supplementation and HIIT program alone led reduced BW gain by 9 and 8 g, respectively, compared with HFD, which was not negligible although not significant. Importantly, in the HIIT + T63 group, BW gain was reduced by 27 g (and not 17 g, obtained by adding the weight restrictions of the T63 and HIIT groups), suggesting a synergistic effect. Furthermore, the BW gain in the HIIT + T63 group and CTRL group (normal diet) were similar, showing that the combined effects of the two interventions completely abolished the BW gain excess induced by HFD. Concerning FM, HIIT with/without T63 supplementation significantly limited adipose tissue deposits. Interestingly, FM gain was comparable in the HIIT + T63 and CTRL groups. All these results are consistent with other studies demonstrating body composition changes with HIIT programs [38,45]. However, unlike Chavanelle et al. (2021) [17] who reported that 16-week T63 supplementation (2.7% incorporated in the food) prevents HFD-induced excessive BW and FM gain in mice, we did not observe any significant body composition effect of T63 alone. This discrepancy could be partly explained by the T63 percentage (2%) in food and the shorter period of supplementation (12 weeks) in our study. Moreover, T63 supplementation was not used to prevent, but to reverse HFD-induced obesity. Thus, our findings indicated that the HIIT and T63 combination is more effective on BW and FM gain than HIIT or T63 alone. Several studies on polyphenol supplementation and exercise reported similar results. In 2009, Maki et al. [46] showed that tea catechins combined with a physical activity program result in loss of total and abdominal FM, but not exercise alone. More recently, Ghasemi and Nayebifar [47] showed that green tea catechins combined with HIIT significantly reduce BW and FM. Considering T63 composition, we could hypothesize that polyphenols (including lutolein, oleuropein, chlorogenic acid or apigenin), in combination with exercise regulate lipolysis, ameliorate mitochondrial functions, and increase fat oxidation [48–51], leading to a significant effect on body composition.

Chavanelle et al. (2021) [17] found that 16-week T63 supplementation prevents HFD-induced detrimental effects on glucose homeostasis in mice, with improvement of fasting insulinemia and insulin responses to the OGTT challenge. In humans, preclinical experiments showed that glucose and insulin responses during OGTT are improved after T63 supplementation for 4 weeks. HIIT effect on glycemic control are still unclear. After a 10-week HIIT program (5 × (2 min at 80–90%VO₂max/1 min 30–35%VO₂max)), Shanaki et al. [39] observed lower fasting glycemia, fasting insulinemia and HOMA-IR in Wistar rats with HFD-induced obesity and diabetes. Conversely, Khalafi et al. [52] did not detect any change in fasting insulinemia. Here, we did not observe any effect of HIIT alone on fasting glucose and insulin concentration and insulin responses during OGTT, but the HIIT + T63 combination significantly improved the glycemic responses during OGTT. On
their own, HIIT and T63 tended to improve the glycemic responses, but the glucose AUC did not show any significant difference. Skeletal muscle is the main tissue involved in postprandial glucose uptake regulation [53]. Thus, skeletal muscle adaptations to training might partly explain HIIT positive effects on glycemic control. In humans and in rodents, long-term physical training increases GLUT4 protein expression and favors GLUT4 translocation and glucose transport in skeletal muscle [54]. Physical training also stimulates the mitochondrial content and the pool of energy metabolism enzymes, such as citrate synthase, leading to higher carbohydrate use during high-intensity exercise [53]. These adaptations are involved in whole-body glucose homeostasis. In our study, GLUT4 content in the soleus muscle tended (not significant) to be higher and OXPHOS complex protein content was significantly increased in the HIIT groups. Moreover, citrate synthase activity was significantly increased in the HIIT + T63 group. These results support the hypothesis that greater skeletal muscle oxidative capacity could partly explain the improvement of glucose tolerance during the OGTT in the training groups, especially in the HIIT + T63 group. The larger effect in the HIIT + T63 vs. HIIT group confirmed T63 impact on glucose metabolism. Several recent studies indicate that combining plant-based supplements with HIIT may enhance energy metabolism [16]. Moreover, several individual compounds included in the T63 supplement have a beneficial effect on skeletal muscle glucose regulation. For example, recent studies showed that oleuropein improves glucose uptake [55], promotes GLUT4 translocation [56], and attenuates hyperglycemia and glucose tolerance impairment in rodents [57].

Pro-/anti-oxidant balance modulation might promote body composition changes [58] and glucose metabolism regulation [59]. Regular physical activity reduces oxLDL and increase SOD and GPx plasmatic activities [60]. Polyphenols also have anti-oxidant properties [61,62]. T63 high polyphenol content (including chlorogenic and oleanolic acids) might promote antioxidant effects [59,63]. Accordingly, in our study, oxLDL was significantly reduced in the HIIT, T63 and HIIT + T63 groups compared with HFD. Moreover, SOD activities in plasma were higher when HIIT and T63 were combined. Overall, these results suggest that HIIT and T63 supplementation could improve glucose homeostasis also by limiting plasma oxidative stress.

Finally, as metabolic diseases (like obesity and diabetes), physical activity, diet interventions and other circulating factors as antioxidants, cytokines, IGF-I, IGFBP3 are associated with changes in microbiota composition and structure [64], we evaluated the impact of HIIT and/or T63 supplementation on the microbiota associated with the intestinal mucosa. The HIIT + T63 combination increased α-diversity and modulated β-diversity of the mucosa-associated microbiota. Our analysis suggests that T63 main effect was on microbiota α- and β-diversity and that HIIT also influenced β-diversity, particularly when associated with T63. As T63 is a blend of five plant extracts, it is difficult to compare our results with literature data on specific compounds. Nevertheless, some studies demonstrated that phenolic compounds and fibers alter gut microbiota, resulting in greater abundance of beneficial bacteria [65]. On the other hand, the real impact of regular physical training on gut microbiota modulation is less clear-cut, and in rodents, conclusions are different depending on the exercise mode (voluntary/forced exercise) and nutritional status [66].

The analysis of specific mucosa-associated microbiota features highlighted several differences in the four groups. First, *Anaeroplasma* abundance was significantly increased in the two HIIT groups, especially in the HIIT + T63 group, and was correlated with FM gain (expressed as g and %), GLUT4 protein content, and soleus citrate synthase activity. *Anaeroplasma* belong to the Tenericutes phylum the abundance of which also was increased in the HIIT groups. Few studies reported Tenericutes phylum changes after physical training, but Allen et al. showed that a 6-week treadmill training increases Tenericutes, like in the present study. Recently, Yuan et al. [67] demonstrated that polysaccharide-rich extracts could reverse the gut microbiota dysbiosis observed in diabetic mice by increasing the abundance of *Anaeroplasma*. *Christensenellaceae* abundance also was increased in our HIIT groups, particularly in the HIIT + T63 group, compared with the HFD and
T63 groups. Its abundance was negatively correlated with BW and FM gains, and positively associated with GLUT4 protein content and citrate synthase activity. Similarly, *Christensenellaceae* abundance was increased after 6 weeks of training and energy restriction in adolescents with obesity [68]. Interestingly, this genus is associated with healthy BMI values and reduces diet-induced weight gain in mice [69] and in humans [70]. Recently, elevated gut microbiome abundance of *Christensenellaceae* was also associated with reduced visceral adipose tissue and healthier metabolic profile in Italian older adults [71]. Interestingly, this bacterium is depleted in inflammatory bowel diseases [72], further confirming its beneficial effect. Finally, *Oscillospira* abundance was significantly increased only in the HIIT + T63 group, and was negatively correlated with fasting insulinemia and HOMA-IR and positively correlated with citrate synthase activity. Haro et al. [73] found higher *Oscillospira* abundance in people with obesity following a Mediterranean, polyphenol- and fiber-rich diet. Surprisingly, T63 supplementation alone did not influence *Oscillospira* abundance. However, different studies showed a negative correlation between *Oscillospira* and glycemic parameters [74,75], like in the present work. Moreover, several studies found that *Oscillospira* abundance in microbiota is increased by physical activity [38,66]. Specifically, our laboratory recently demonstrated that a 12-week HIIT program increases *Oscillospira* abundance that is negatively correlated with BW and FM changes [45]. Taken together, these results suggest that *Anaeroplasmaceae*, *Christensenellaceae* and *Oscillospira* strains could be a promising new generation of probiotics in the context of obesity and T2D.

There is inter-individual variability in the metabolic responses to physical training [76]. Different factors, such as genetic and epigenetic features, nutrition, concomitant treatments, may explain this heterogeneity [77,78]. Gut microbiota composition also may be a potential factor to explain the training response variability [79]. Similarly, the metabolic adaptations to nutritional interventions also show variability, particularly upon exposure to polyphenolic compounds [80]. Moreover, metabolic adaptations induced by nutritional interventions might be influenced by the gut microbiota composition before the supplementation/diet [44,81]. Altogether, these findings suggest that the greater results of the HIIT + T63 combination on body composition and glucose metabolism in our study might be explained by its effect on the gut microbiota composition.

**5. Conclusions**

Obesity and prediabetes are the two strongest risks factors of T2D. Therefore, it is important to identify non-drug strategies to prevent and treat obesity and glucose tolerance impairment. Our preclinical study using an animal model of obesity induced by a Western-style diet showed that physical activity combined with T63, a natural-rich polyphenol plant extract supplement, limits FM gain, and improves glycemic control by increasing skeletal muscle oxidative capacity. Changes in the intestinal mucosa-associated microbiota (particularly *Anaeroplasma*, *Christensenellaceae* and *Oscillospira*) were more important in the HIIT + T63 group. Thus, the combination of HIIT and T63 supplementation could be proposed for the management of obesity and prediabetes and also of other chronic pathologies involving gut microbiota dysbiosis.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu13051569/s1, Figure S1: Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on GLUT4 protein content (A), citrate synthase (CS) activity (B), and OXPHOS complex protein content (C) in gastrocnemius. \* *p* < 0.05, \*\* *p* < 0.005, \*\*\* *p* < 0.0005, Figure S2: Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on Ppargc1α (A) and Nrf1 (B) gene expression in soleus. \* *p* < 0.05, Figure S3: Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in gastrocnemius (A-B-C), epididymal adipose tissue (D-E-F) and in liver (G-H-I), Figure S4: Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on myeloperoxidase (MPO) (A), and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) (B) concentration in plasma, Figure S5: Effects of T63 supplementation and/or HIIT on inflammatory gene expression in colon (A-B-C-D), epididymal adipose tissue (E-F-G-H) and in subcutaneous adipose tissue (I-J-K).
**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, V.C., P.S., Y.F.O. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Data cura-
tion, M.D. and V.C.; Formal analysis, M.D. and B.C.; Funding acquisition, N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau);
Investigation, M.D., V.C., B.C., F.P., M.E., C.P., A.B., N.B. (Nicolas Barnich), V.P., T.M., F.L.J., P.S., Y.F.O.
and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Methodology, V.C., P.S., Y.F.O. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Project
administration, N.B. (Nicolas Barnich), Y.F.O. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Resources, N.B. (Nicolas
Barnich), S.P., P.S. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Supervision, N.B. (Nicolas Barnich), P.S., Y.F.O. and
N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Validation, B.C., S.P., P.S. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Writing—original
draft, M.D. and N.B. (Nathalie Boisseau); Writing—review & editing, M.D. and N.B. (Nathalie
Boisseau). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This study was mainly funded by grants from Valbiotis. Benoit Chassaing's laboratory is supported by a Starting Grant from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. ERC-2018-StG-804135), a Chaire d'Excellence from IdEx Université de Paris—ANR-18-IDEX-0001, and an Innovator Award from the Kenneth Rainin Foundation.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** This animal study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of C2EA-02, Auvergne, France (APAFIS 17413-2018070413182792 obtained the 17 September 2018).

**Acknowledgments:** We thank the Installation Experimental de Nutrition (IEN) for animal care (INRAE, Theix, France) and the Centre Imagerie Cellulaire Santé (CICS) platform (Clermont Auvergne Université, Clermont-Ferrand, France). We also thank Lucy Garraud, Geoffrey Delcros, Alice Besson and. Allison for their valued technical help during the experiment. Thanks to Odd-Erik Johansen (Nestlé Health Science) for his scientific assistance and advices in the process of writing this article.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**References**

1. Cho, N.H.; Shaw, J.E.; Karuranga, S.; Huang, Y.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Ohlrogge, A.W.; Malanda, B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global Estimates of Diabetes Prevalence for 2017 and Projections for 2045. *Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.* **2018**, *138*, 271–281. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. ADA 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. *Diabetes Care* **2017**, *40*, S11–S24. [CrossRef]

3. Palacios, O.M.; Kramer, M.; Maki, K.C. Diet and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Beyond Weight Loss and Exercise. *Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab.* **2019**, *14*, 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Tabák, A.G.; Herder, C.; Rathmann, W.; Brunner, E.J.; Kivimäki, M. Prediabetes: A High-Risk State for Diabetes Development. *Lancet* **2012**, *379*, 2279–2290. [CrossRef]

5. Tuso, P. Prediabetes and Lifestyle Modification: Time to Prevent a Preventable Disease. *Perm. J.* **2014**, *18*, 88–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Gastaldelli, A.; Gaggini, M.; DeFronzo, R.A. Role of Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance in the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the San Antonio Metabolism Study. *Diabetes* **2017**, *66*, 815–822. [CrossRef]

7. Apovian, C.M.; Okemah, J.; O'Neil, P.M. Body Weight Considerations in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. *Adv. Ther.* **2019**, *36*, 44–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Donnelly, J.E.; Blair, S.N.; Jakicic, J.M.; Manore, M.M.; Rankin, J.W.; Smith, B.K.; American College of Sports Medicine American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate Physical Activity Intervention Strategies for Weight Loss and Prevention of Weight Regain for Adults. *Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.* **2009**, *41*, 459–471. [CrossRef]

9. Weston, K.S.; Wisløff, U.; Coombes, J.S. High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients with Lifestyle-Induced Cardiometabolic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. *Br. J. Sports Med.* **2014**, *48*, 1227–1234. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Maillard, F.; Pereira, B.; Boisseau, N. Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Total, Abdominal and Visceral Fat Mass: A Meta-Analysis. *Sports Med.* **2018**, *48*, 269–288. [CrossRef]

11. Dupuit, M.; Maillard, F.; Pereira, B.; Marquezi, M.L.; Lancha, A.H.; Boisseau, N. Effect of High Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition in Women before and after Menopause: A Meta-Analysis. *Exp. Physiol.* **2020**, *105*, 1470–1490. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Francois, M.E.; Little, J.P. Effectiveness and Safety of High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. *Diabetes Spectr.* **2015**, *28*, 39–44. [CrossRef]

13. Colberg, S.R.; Sigal, R.J.; Yardley, J.E.; Riddell, M.C.; Dunstan, D.W.; Dempsey, P.C.; Horton, E.S.; Castorino, K.; Tate, D.F. Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. *Diabetes Care* **2016**, *39*, 2065–2079. [CrossRef]

14. Wormgoor, S.G.; Dalleck, L.C.; Zinn, C.; Borotkanics, R.; Harris, N.K. High-Intensity Interval Training Is Equivalent to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes of Glucose Control, Cardiometabolic Risk, and Microvascular Complication Markers in Men with Type 2 Diabetes. *Front. Endocrinol.* **2018**, *9*. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Gibala, M.J.; Little, J.P.; Macdonald, M.J.; Hawley, J.A. Physiological Adaptations to Low-Volume, High-Intensity Interval Training in Health and Disease. *J. Physiol.* **2012**, *590*, 1077–1084. [CrossRef]

16. Forbes, S.C.; Candow, D.G.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; Hirsch, K.R.; Roberts, M.D.; VanDusseldorp, T.A.; Stratton, M.T.; Kaviani, M.; Little, J.P. Supplements and Nutritional Interventions to Augment High-Intensity Interval Training Physiological and Performance Adaptations-A Narrative Review. *Nutrients* **2020**, *12*, 390. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17. Chavanelle, V.; Otero, Y.F.; Le Joubioux, F.; Ripoche, D.; Bargetto, M.; Vluggens, A.; Montaurier, C.; Pickering, G.; Ducheix, G.; Dubray, C.; et al. Effects of Totum-63 on Glucose Homeostasis and Post-Prandial Glycemia: A Translational Study. *AJP-Endocrinol. Metabol.* **2021**. [CrossRef]

18. Blandino, G.; Inturri, R.; Lazzara, F.; Di Rosa, M.; Malaguarnera, L. Impact of Gut Microbiota on Diabetes Mellitus. *Diabetes Metab.* **2016**, *42*, 303–315. [CrossRef]

19. Pasini, E.; Corsetti, G.; Assanelli, D.; Testa, C.; Romano, C.; Dioguardi, F.S.; Aquilani, R. Effects of Chronic Exercise on Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Barrier in Human with Type 2 Diabetes. *Minerva Med.* **2019**, *110*, 3–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20. Campbell, S.C.; Wisniewski, P.J. Exercise Is a Novel Promoter of Intestinal Health and Microbial Diversity. *Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev.* **2017**, *45*, 41–47. [CrossRef]

21. Monda, V.; Villano, I.; Messina, A.; Valenzano, A.; Esposito, T.; Moscatelli, F.; Viggiano, A.; Cibelli, G.; Chieffi, S.; Monda, M.; et al. Exercise Modifies the Gut Microbiota with Positive Health Effects. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2017**, *2017*, 3831972. [CrossRef]

22. Matthews, D.R.; Hosker, J.P.; Rudenski, A.S.; Naylor, B.A.; Treacher, D.F.; Turner, R.C. Homeostasis Model Assessment: Insulin Resistance and β-Cell Function from Fasting Plasma Glucose and Insulin Concentrations in Man. *Diabetologia* **1985**, *28*, 412–419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Alp, P.R.; Newsholme, E.A.; Zammit, V.A. Activities of Citrate Synthase and NAD+-Linked and NADP+-Linked Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in Muscle from Vertebrates and Invertebrates. *Biochem. J.* **1976**, *154*, 689–700. [CrossRef]

24. Stephenson, E.J.; Camera, D.M.; Jenkins, T.A.; Kosari, S.; Lee, J.S.; Hawley, J.A.; Stepto, N.K. Skeletal Muscle Respiratory Capacity Is Enhanced in Rats Consuming an Obesogenic Western Diet. *Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.* **2012**, *302*, E1541–E1549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Chavanelle, V.; Boisseau, N.; Otero, Y.F.; Combaret, L.; Dardevet, D.; Montaurier, C.; Delcros, G.; Peltier, S.L.; Sirvent, P. Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Glycaemic Control and Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Function in Db/Db Mice. *Sci. Rep.* **2017**, *7*, 204. [CrossRef]

26. Gilda, J.E.; Ghosh, R.; Cheah, J.X.; West, T.M.; Bodine, S.C.; Gomes, A.V. Western Blotting Inaccuracies with Unverified Antibodies: Need for a Western Blotting Minimal Reporting Standard (WBMRS). *PLoS ONE* **2015**, *10*, e0135392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Groussard, C.; Maillard, F.; Vazeille, E.; Barnich, N.; Sirvent, P.; Otero, Y.F.; Combaret, L.; Madeuf, E.; Sourdrille, A.; Delcros, G.; et al. Tissue-Specific Oxidative Stress Modulation by Exercise: A Comparison between MICT and HIIT in an Obese Rat Model. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2019**, *2019*, 1965364. [CrossRef]

28. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-High-Throughput Microbial Community Analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq Platforms. *ISME J.* **2012**, *6*, 1621–1624. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science Using QIIME 2. *Nat. Biotechnol.* **2019**, *37*, 852–857. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data. *Nat. Methods* **2016**, *13*, 581–583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

31. McDonald, D.; Price, M.N.; Goodrich, J.; Nawrocki, E.P.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Probst, A.; Andersen, G.L.; Knight, R.; Hugenholtz, P. An Improved Greengenes Taxonomy with Explicit Ranks for Ecological and Evolutionary Analyses of Bacteria and Archaea. *ISME J.* **2012**, *6*, 610–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32. Mandal, S.; Van Treuren, W.; White, R.A.; Eggesbø, M.; Knight, R.; Peddada, S.D. Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes: A Novel Method for Studying Microbial Composition. *Microb. Ecol. Health Dis.* **2015**, *26*, 27663. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Cordain, L.; Eaton, S.B.; Sebastian, A.; Mann, N.; Lindeberg, S.; Watkins, B.A.; O'Keefe, J.H.; Brand-Miller, J. Origins and Evolution of the Western Diet: Health Implications for the 21st Century. *Am. J. Clin. Nutr.* **2005**, *81*, 341–354. [CrossRef]

34. Magkos, F.; Hjorth, M.F.; Astrup, A. Diet and Exercise in the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. *Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.* **2020**, *16*, 545–555. [CrossRef]

35. Montefusco, L.; D'Addio, F.; Loretelli, C.; Ben Nasr, M.; Garziano, M.; Rossi, A.; Pastore, I.; Plebani, L.; Lunati, M.E.; Bolla, A.M.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Diet and Caloric Restriction in Metabolic Syndrome. *J. Endocrinol. Investig.* **2021**. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36. Maillard, F.; Rousset, S.; Pereira, B.; Boirie, Y.; Duclos, M.; Boisseau, N. High-Intensity Interval Training Is More Effective than Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Reducing Abdominal Fat Mass in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study. *Diabetes Metab.* **2018**, *44*, 516–517. [CrossRef]

37. Wewege, M.; van den Berg, R.; Ward, R.E.; Keech, A. The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. *Obes. Rev.* **2017**, *18*, 635–646. [CrossRef]
38. Maillard, F.; Vazeille, E.; Sauvanet, P.; Sirvent, P.; Combaret, L.; Sourdrille, A.; Chavanelle, V.; Bonnet, R.; Otero, Y.F.; Delcros, G.; et al. High Intensity Interval Training Promotes Total and Visceral Fat Mass Loss in Obese Zucker Rats without Modulating Gut Microbiota. *PLoS ONE* **2019**, *14*, e0214660. [CrossRef]

39. Shanaki, M.; Khosravi, M.; Khoshdooni-Farahani, A.; Dadashi, A.; Heydari, M.F.; Delfan, M.; Jafary, H.; Gorgani-Firuzjaee, S. High-Intensity Interval Training Reversed High-Fat Diet-Induced M1-Macrophage Polarization in Rat Adipose Tissue via Inhibition of NOTCH Signaling. *J. Inflamm. Res.* **2020**, *13*, 165–174. [CrossRef]

40. de Araujo, G.G.; Papoti, M.; dos Reis, I.G.M.; de Mello, M.A.R.; Gobatto, C.A. Short and Long Term Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Hormones, Metabolites, Antioxidant System, Glycogen Concentration, and Aerobic Performance Adaptations in Rats. *Front. Physiol.* **2016**, *7*. [CrossRef]

41. Caesar, R.; Tremaroli, V.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Cani, P.D.; Bäckhed, F. Crosstalk between Gut Microbiota and Dietary Lipids Aggravates WAT Inflammation through TLR Signaling. *Cell Metab.* **2015**, *22*, 658–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

42. Millman, J.; Okamoto, S.; Kimura, A.; Uema, T.; Higa, M.; Yonamine, M.; Namba, T.; Ogata, E.; Yamazaki, S.; Shimabukuro, M.; et al. Metabolically and Immunologically Beneficial Impact of Extra Virgin Olive and Flaxseed Oils on Composition of Gut Microbiota in Mice. *Eur. J. Nutr.* **2020**, *59*, 2411–2425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Patterson, E.; Doherty, R.M.O.; Murphy, E.F.; Wall, R.; Sullivan, O.O.; Nilaweera, K.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Impact of Dietary Fatty Acids on Metabolic Activity and Host Intestinal Microbiota Composition in C57BL/6J Mice. *Br. J. Nutr.* **2014**, *111*, 1905–1917. [CrossRef]

44. Ramos-Romero, S.; Léniz, A.; Martínez-Maqueda, D.; Amézqueta, S.; Fernández-Quintela, A.; Hereu, M.; Torres, J.L.; Portillo, M.P.; Pérez-Jiménez, J. Inter-Individual Variability in Insulin Response after Grape Pomace Supplementation in Subjects at High Cardiometabolic Risk: Role of Microbiota and MiRNA. *Mol. Nutr. Food Res.* **2021**, *65*, 2000113. [CrossRef]

45. Plissonneau, C.; Capel, F.; Chassaing, B.; Dupuit, M.; Maillard, F.; Wawrzyniak, I.; Combaret, L.; Dutheil, F.; Etienne, M.; Mairesse, G.; et al. High-Intensity Interval Training and α-Linolenic Acid Supplementation Improve DHA Conversion and Increase the Abundance of Gut Mucosa-Associated Oscillospira Bacteria. *Nutrients* **2021**, *13*, 788. [CrossRef]

46. Maki, K.C.; Reeves, M.S.; Farmer, M.; Yasunaga, K.; Matsuo, N.; Katsuragi, Y.; Komikado, M.; Tokimitsu, I.; Wilder, D.; Jones, F.; et al. Green Tea Catechin Consumption Enhances Exercise-Induced Abdominal Fat Loss in Overweight and Obese Adults. *J. Nutr.* **2009**, *139*, 264–270. [CrossRef]

47. Ghasemi, E.; Nayebifar, S. Benefits of 10 Weeks of High-Intensity Interval Training and Green Tea Supplementation on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and VO2max in Overweight Women. *J. Res. Med. Sci.* **2019**, *24*, 79. [CrossRef]

48. Kwon, E.-Y.; Jung, U.J.; Park, T.; Yun, J.W.; Choi, M.-S. Luteolin Attenuates Hepatic Steatosis and Insulin Resistance Through the Interplay Between the Liver and Adipose Tissue in Mice with Diet-Induced Obesity. *Diabetes* **2015**, *64*, 1658–1669. [CrossRef]

49. Ebaid, G.M.; Seiva, F.R.; Rocha, K.K.; Souza, G.A.; Novelli, E.L. Effects of Olive Oil and Its Minor Phenolic Constituents on Obesity-Induced Cardiac Metabolic Changes. *Nutr. J.* **2010**, *9*, 46. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

50. Park, J.; Min, J.-S.; Chae, U.; Lee, J.Y.; Song, K.-S.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.-R.; Lee, D.-S. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Oleuropein on Microglia through Regulation of Drp1-Dependent Mitochondrial Fission. *J. Neuroimmunol.* **2017**, *306*, 46–52. [CrossRef]

51. Choi, W.H.; Son, H.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Ahn, J.; Jung, C.H.; Ha, T.Y. Apigenin Ameliorates the Obesity-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy by Attenuating Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Muscle of Obese Mice. *Mol. Nutr. Food Res.* **2017**, *61*, 1700218. [CrossRef]

52. Khalafi, M.; Mohebbi, H.; Symonds, M.E.; Karimi, P.; Akbari, A.; Tabari, E.; Faridnia, M.; Moghaddami, K. The Impact of Moderate-Intensity Continuous or High-Intensity Interval Training on Adipogenesis and Browning of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Obese Male Rats. *Nutrients* **2020**, *12*, 925. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

53. Park, J.-S.; Holloszy, J.O.; Kim, K.; Koh, J.-H. Exercise Training-Induced PPARβ Increases PGC-1α Protein Stability and Improves Insulin-Induced Glucose Uptake in Rodent Muscles. *Nutrients* **2020**, *12*, 652. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54. Cunha, V.N.; de Lima, M.P.; Motta-Santos, D.; Pesquero, J.L.; de Andrade, R.V.; de Almeida, J.A.; Araujo, R.C.; Campbell, C.S.G.; Lewis, J.E.; Simões, H.G. Role of Exercise Intensity on GLUT4 Content, Aerobic Fitness and Fasting Plasma Glucose in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. *Cell Biochem. Funct.* **2015**, *33*, 435–442. [CrossRef]

55. Alkhateeb, H.; Al-Duais, M.; Qnais, E. Beneficial Effects of Oleuropein on Glucose Uptake and on Parameters Relevant to the Normal Homeostatic Mechanisms of Glucose Regulation in Rat Skeletal Muscle. *Phytother. Res.* **2018**, *32*, 651–656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56. Fujiwara, Y.; Tsukahara, C.; Ikeda, N.; Sone, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Ichi, I.; Koike, T.; Aoki, Y. Oleuropein Improves Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle by Promoting the Translocation of GLUT4. *J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr.* **2017**, *61*, 196–202. [CrossRef]

57. Murotomi, K.; Umeno, A.; Yasunaga, M.; Shichiri, M.; Ishida, N.; Koike, T.; Matsuo, T.; Abe, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Nakajima, Y. Oleuropein-Rich Diet Attenuates Hyperglycemia and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Type 2 Diabetes Model Mouse. *J. Agric. Food Chem.* **2015**, *63*, 6715–6722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

58. Emami, S.R.; Jafari, M.; Haghshenas, R.; Ravasi, A. Impact of Eight Weeks Endurance Training on Biochemical Parameters and Obesity-Induced Oxidative Stress in High Fat Diet-Fed Rats. *J. Exerc. Nutr. Biochem.* **2016**, *20*, 29–35. [CrossRef]

59. Ben Salem, M.; Ben Abdallah Kolsi, R.; Dhouibi, R.; Ksouda, K.; Charfi, S.; Yaich, M.; Hammami, S.; Sahnoun, Z.; Zeghal, K.M.; Jamoussi, K.; et al. Protective Effects of Cynara Scolymus Leaves Extract on Metabolic Disorders and Oxidative Stress in Alloxan-Diabetic Rats. *BMC Complement Altern. Med.* **2017**, *17*, 328. [CrossRef]
60. Elosua, R.; Molina, L.; Fito, M.; Arquer, A.; Sanchez-Quesada, J.L.; Covas, M.I.; Ordoñez-Llanos, J.; Marrugat, J. Response of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers to a 16-Week Aerobic Physical Activity Program, and to Acute Physical Activity, in Healthy Young Men and Women. *Atherosclerosis* **2003**, *167*, 327–334. [CrossRef]

61. Osawa, T. Protective Role of Dietary Polyphenols in Oxidative Stress. *Mechan. Ageing Dev.* **1999**, *111*, 133–139. [CrossRef]

62. Fraga, C.G.; Croft, K.D.; Kennedy, D.O.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. The Effects of Polyphenols and Other Bioactives on Human Health. *Food Funct.* **2019**, *10*, 514–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

63. Wang, X.; Liu, R.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Liao, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Qin, X.; Hai, C. Oleanolic Acid Improves Hepatic Insulin Resistance via Antioxidant, Hypolipidemic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects. *Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.* **2013**, *376*, 70–80. [CrossRef]

64. D'Addio, F.; La Rosa, S.; Maestroni, A.; Jung, P.; Orsenigo, E.; Ben Nasr, M.; Tezza, S.; Bassi, R.; Finzi, G.; Marando, A.; et al. Circulating IGF-I and IGFBP3 Levels Control Human Colonic Stem Cell Function and Are Disrupted in Diabetic Enteropathy. *Cell Stem Cell* **2015**, *17*, 486–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

65. Rinninella, E.; Cintoni, M.; Raoul, P.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F.; Pulcini, G.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. Food Components and Dietary Habits: Keys for a Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition. *Nutrients* **2019**, *11*, 2393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Allen, J.M.; Berg Miller, M.E.; Pence, B.D.; Whitlock, K.; Nehra, V.; Gaskins, H.R.; White, B.A.; Fryer, J.D.; Woods, J.A. Voluntary and Forced Exercise Differentially Alters the Gut Microbiome in C57BL/6J Mice. *J. Appl. Physiol.* **2015**, *118*, 1059–1066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

67. Yuan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, C. Beneficial Effects of Polysaccharide-Rich Extracts from Apocynum Venetum Leaves on Hypoglycemic and Gut Microbiota in Type 2 Diabetic Mice. *Biomed. Pharmacother.* **2020**, *127*, 110182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

68. Huang, J.; Liao, J.; Fang, Y.; Deng, H.; Yin, H.; Shen, B.; Hu, M. Six-Week Exercise Training with Dietary Restriction Improves Central Hemodynamics Associated With Altered Gut Microbiota in Adolescents With Obesity. *Front. Endocrinol.* **2020**, *11*, 569085. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

69. Goodrich, J.K.; Waters, J.L.; Poole, A.C.; Sutter, J.L.; Koren, O.; Blekhman, R.; Beaumont, M.; Van Treuren, W.; Knight, R.; Bell, J.T.; et al. Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome. *Cell* **2014**, *159*, 789–799. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

70. Ezzat-Zadeh, Z.; Henning, S.M.; Yang, J.; Woo, S.L.; Lee, R.-P.; Huang, J.; Thames, G.; Gilbuena, I.; Tseng, C.-H.; Heber, D.; et al. California Strawberry Consumption Increased the Abundance of Gut Microorganisms Related to Lean Body Weight, Health and Longevity in Healthy Subjects. *Nutr. Res.* **2020**, *85*, 60–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

71. Tavella, T.; Rampelli, S.; Guidarelli, G.; Bazzocchi, A.; Gasperini, C.; Pujos-Guillot, E.; Comte, B.; Barone, M.; Biagi, E.; Candela, M.; et al. Elevated Gut Microbiome Abundance of Christensenellaceae, Porphyromonadaceae and Rikenellaceae Is Associated with Reduced Visceral Adipose Tissue and Healthier Metabolic Profile in Italian Elderly. *Gut Microbes* **2021**, *13*, 1–19. [CrossRef]

72. Waters, J.L.; Ley, R.E. The Human Gut Bacteria Christensenellaceae Are Widespread, Heritable, and Associated with Health. *BMC Biol.* **2019**, *17*, 83. [CrossRef]

73. Haro, C.; Montes-Borrego, M.; Rangel-Zúñiga, O.A.; Alcalá-Díaz, J.F.; Gómez-Delgado, F.; Pérez-Martínez, P.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Tinahones, F.J.; Landa, B.B.; et al. Two Healthy Diets Modulate Gut Microbial Community Improving Insulin Sensitivity in a Human Obese Population. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* **2016**, *101*, 233–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

74. Taniguchi, H.; Tanisawa, K.; Sun, X.; Kubo, T.; Hoshino, Y.; Hosokawa, M.; Takeyama, H.; Higuchi, M. Effects of Short-Term Endurance Exercise on Gut Microbiota in Elderly Men. *Physiol. Rep.* **2018**, *6*, e13935. [CrossRef]

75. Quiroga, R.; Nistal, E.; Estébanez, B.; Porras, D.; Juárez-Fernández, M.; Martínez-Flórez, S.; García-Mediavilla, M.V.; de Paz, J.A.; González-Gallego, J.; Sánchez-Campos, S.; et al. Exercise Training Modulates the Gut Microbiota Profile and Impairs Inflammatory Signaling Pathways in Obese Children. *Exp. Mol. Med.* **2020**, *52*, 1048–1061. [CrossRef]

76. Stephens, N.A.; Sparks, L.M. Resistance to the Beneficial Effects of Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes: Are Some Individuals Programmed to Fail? *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* **2015**, *100*, 43–52. [CrossRef]

77. Solomon, T.P.J. Sources of Inter-Individual Variability in the Therapeutic Response of Blood Glucose Control to Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes: Going Beyond Exercise Dose. *Front. Physiol.* **2018**, *9*, 896. [CrossRef]

78. Malin, S.K.; Stewart, N.R. Metformin May Contribute to Inter-Individual Variability for Glycemic Responses to Exercise. *Front. Endocrinol.* **2020**, *11*, 519. [CrossRef]

79. Sparks, L.M. Exercise Training Response Heterogeneity: Physiological and Molecular Insights. *Diabetologia* **2017**, *60*, 2329–2336. [CrossRef]

80. Marino, M.; Del Bo', C.; Martini, D.; Porrini, M.; Riso, P. A Review of Registered Clinical Trials on Dietary (Poly)Phenols: Past Efforts and Possible Future Directions. *Foods* **2020**, *9*, 1606. [CrossRef]

81. Korpela, K.; Flint, H.J.; Johnstone, A.M.; Lappi, J.; Poutanen, K.; Dewulf, E.; Delzenne, N.; de Vos, W.M.; Salonen, A. Gut Microbiota Signatures Predict Host and Microbiota Responses to Dietary Interventions in Obese Individuals. *PLoS ONE* **2014**, *9*, e90702. [CrossRef] [PubMed]