Optimizing the feeding frequency to maximize the production of sterile males in tsetse mass-rearing colonies

Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera, Abdou Salam Belem, Adrien Marie Gaston Belem, Mamadou Ira, Bénéwendé Aristide Kaboré, Lassané Percoma, Issa Sidibé

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera, Abdou Salam Belem, et al.. Optimizing the feeding frequency to maximize the production of sterile males in tsetse mass-rearing colonies. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0245503. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503). This is the original version of the article.

HAL Id: hal-04296390

https://hal.science/hal-04296390v1

Submitted on 20 Nov 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Optimizing the feeding frequency to maximize the production of sterile males in tsetse mass-rearing colonies

Soumaïla Pagabeleguem<sup>1,2,*</sup>, Ange Irénée Toé<sup>1,2*</sup>, Sié Hermann Pooda<sup>1,2</sup>, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera<sup>2</sup>, Abdou Salam Belem<sup>2,3</sup>, Adrien Marie Gaston Belem<sup>4</sup>, Gisèle Marie Sophie Ouedraogo/Sanou<sup>2</sup>, Mamadou Ira<sup>2</sup>, Bénéwendé Aristide Kaboré<sup>2</sup>, Lassané Percoma<sup>2,5</sup>, Issa Sidibé<sup>2,6</sup>

1 Université de Dédougou (UDDG), Dédougou, Burkina Faso, 2 Insectarium de Bobo-Dioulasso - Campagne d'Eradication de la mouche Tsé-tsé et de la Trypanosomiase (IBD-CETT), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 3 Ecole Privée d'Elevage et de Santé Animale (EPESA), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 4 Université Nazi Boni (UNB), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 5 Ecole de Lutte Anti Tsé-tsé (ELAT), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 6 Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Élevage en Zone Subhumide (CIRDES), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

These authors contributed equally to this work.

* pagasoum@yahoo.fr

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

## OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Pagabeleguem S, Toé Al, Pooda SH, Dera KM, Belem AS, Belem AMG, et al. (2021) Optimizing the feeding frequency to maximize the production of sterile males in tsetse mass-rearing colonies. PLoS ONE 16(1): e0245503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503

**Editor:** Ahmed Ibrahim Hasaballah, Al-Azhar University, EGYPT

**Received:** August 8, 2020

**Accepted:** December 31, 2020

**Published:** January 14, 2021

**Copyright:** © 2021 Pagabeleguem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the manuscript and its [Supporting information files](#).

**Funding:** This work was supported by the Insectarium de Bobo-Dioulasso - Campagne d'Eradication de la mouche Tsé-tsé et de la Trypanosomose (IBD-CETT; https://www.pattec.bf/) through its operating budget 2018 allocated by the State of Burkina Faso and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA; https://www.iaea.org/) through the Research Contract No. 22660.

## Abstract

Tsetse flies are cyclical vectors of trypanosomes, the causative agents of sleeping sickness or Human African Trypanosomosis and nagana or African Animal Trypanosomosis in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Insectarium de Bobo-Dioulasso (IBD) was created and equipped in the frame of Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC) with the main goal to provide sterile males for the different eradication programs in West Africa which is already the case with the ongoing eradication program in Senegal. The aim of this study was to identify the best feeding regime in mass-rearing colonies of *Glossina palpalis gambiaensis* to optimize the yield of sterile males. We investigated the mortality and fecundity for various feeding regimes and day alternation (3x: Monday-Wednesday-Friday, 4x: Monday-Wednesday-Friday-Saturday, 4x: Monday-Wednesday-Thursday-Friday and 6x: all days except Sunday) on adult tsetse flies in routine rearing over 60 days after emergence. The day alternation in the 4 blood meals per week (feeding regimes 2 and 3) had no effect on tsetse fly mortality and fecundity. The best feeding regime was the regime of 4 blood meals per week which resulted in higher significant fecundity (PPIF = 2.5; P = 0.003) combined with lower mortality of females (P = 0.0003) than the 3 blood meals per week (PPIF = 2.0) and in similar fecundity (PPIF = 2.6; P = 0.70) and mortality (P = 0.51) than the 6 blood meals per week. This feeding regime was extended to the whole colonies, resulting in an improved yield of sterile males for the ongoing eradication program in Senegal and would be more cost-effective for the implementation of the next-coming sterile insect technique (SIT) programs in West Africa.
The funders had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.

**Competing interests:** The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.

**Background**

Tsetse flies transmit trypanosomes which cause sleeping sickness or Human African Trypanosomoses (HAT) and nagana or African Animal Trypanosomoses (AAT), a debilitating diseases affecting humans and livestock, respectively [1]. The tsetse flies infest 38 countries of sub-Saharan Africa constraining the development of sustainable and productive agricultural systems in over 10 million km² [2]. The presence of this insect leads to potential losses in livestock and crop production estimated at USD 4,750 million annually [3]. In this context, vector control is considered as an important component of the integrated management of both HAT and AAT. The control of these diseases within an area-wide integrated pest management approach (AW-IPM) using the sterile insect technique (SIT) has shown its effectiveness in Burkina Faso [4], Nigeria [5] and Zanzibar [6]. Motivated by these encouraging results, the African Heads of States and Governments committed for better food security through better management of the tsetse flies and the parasites they transmit by creating in 2000 in Lome the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC) [7]. In Burkina Faso, 83% reduction of densities was observed for *Glossina palpalis gambiensis* and 92% reduction for *G. tachinoides* on 40000 km² has been achieved through an integrated control campaign including insecticide targets, traps and cattle, sequential aerial treatment (SAT) and the mass treatment of livestock using trypanocidal products, from June 2006 to December 2013 [8]. Moreover, during this phase of PATTEC Burkina, a mass-rearing facility named Insectarium de Bobo-Dioulasso (IBD) was built and equipped with capacities to produce about 1,000,000 sterile males weekly in cruise production. The main goal of this facility is to satisfy the needs in sterile males for the program of Burkina Faso and the other countries infected by the same tsetse species. The rearing started in July 2016 and currently, two species of flies are mass-reared, *G. palpalis gambiensis* and *G. morsitans submorsitans*. Some initiatives are underway to establish *G. tachinoides* colony.

Under the PATTEC initiative, the Government of Senegal initiated in 2005 a tsetse flies eradication program in the Niayes area that integrated the SIT with other control tactics such as insecticides treated targets and insecticides treated cattle [9–11]. For the SIT component, an agreement was made with the IBD to mass-produce *G. p. gambiensis* to supply 50,000 sterile male pupae weekly to Senegal for this AW-IPM program since 2017. The tsetse flies colony should double every 3–4 months if all conditions are optimal [12]. Since the start of this agreement, the IBD has not been able to supply the necessary quantity of sterile pupae, despite the improving of rearing conditions, thus limiting the possibilities of complying with the agreement.

In order to respond to that demand for the ongoing program in Senegal and the near future programs in Africa, IBD has recently undertaken experiments aiming to improve the rearing system and the quality of the tsetse flies produced. Indeed, *In vitro* blood feeding, the major factor determining the productivity and survival rate of tsetse, Glossina species is the qualitative and quantitative amount of blood imbibed during the interlarval period [13]. This study was therefore initiated to test various feeding regime to optimize the production of sterile males in the IBD tsetse mass-rearing facility.

**Materials and methods**

**Insectary**

The study was carried out at the Insectarium de Bobo-Dioulasso (IBD) localized at Darsa-
lamy, 15 Km from Bobo-Dioulasso (11°03'32.4"N and 4°21'10.9"W), Burkina Faso. The rear-
ing rooms included air circulation, cooling and humidification to manage environmental
parameters. The temperature and relative humidity of the holding rooms were kept at a standard tsetse colony rearing conditions 25 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5% RH [14] during the tests (see supplementary material (S1 Fig) for recorded data) and 12:12 light:dark photoperiod for pupae incubation, emergence, feeding and the monitoring of the flies.

## Tsetse species and strain

All experiments were carried out with a strain of *G. p. gambiensis* fed on silicone membranes at the IBD. The colony was derived from a strain that was established at Maisons-Alfort, France in 1972 and originated from Guinguette, a locality near Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. It was transferred in 1975 to the Centre de Recherche sur les Trypanosomiases Animales (CRTA), Burkina Faso [15–17] [CRTA is the former name of the Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'Elevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES)]. In 2016, 53,972 adult flies of this CIRDES colony were transferred to the IBD to where a colony was likewise established for mass production.

## Blood origin and preparation

The bovine blood used to feed the *G. p. gambiensis* colony was collected from the slaughterhouse of Bobo-Dioulasso, with the consent from the slaughterhouse managers in order to obtain the blood samples from livestock. The blood was immediately defibrinated after collection and transported to laboratory for proportioning and quality control operations. Previously frozen at -20°C, the blood was irradiated with 1 KGry in a Cobalt 60 irradiator (model 812, Sn 002). The blood quality-control was tested after irradiation through the microbial contamination value that consisted of bacteriological cultures on agarose middle in petri dishes at 37°C. After 72 hours incubation, the blood batch is declared of good quality if the number of microbial colonies is less than 10 and used to feed the tsetse colony. Aliquots of the blood are thawed and used as required. The experimental flies were fed on an *in vitro* silicone membrane system with the blood which was heated to 36–37°C on controlled aluminum plates of Tsetse Production Unit (TPU4).

## Feeding regime

The study was run from March to May, 2018 and included 480 *G. p. gambiensis* (360 females and 120 males) from the same production batch (Table 1) and follow up at the same period of time.

Newly emerged flies were separated by sex and put into cages (13cm x 5cm x 8cm) covered with white tulle of large mesh (2.5 mm) following the initial male to female ratio of 1:3 [18]. The large mesh allowed third instar larvae (L3) to escape from the cage. The cages were placed in the same room as the main colony. Males and females remained together until the end of the experiment.

<table><caption>Table 1. Number of females and male *Glossina palpalis gambiensis* tested according to the feeding regimes.</caption><thead><tr><td>Feeding regime/week</td><td>Males</td><td>Females</td><td>Number of cages</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1 (3x: mon-wed-fri)</td><td>30</td><td>90</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>2 (4x: mon-wed-fri-sat)</td><td>30</td><td>90</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>3 (4x: mon-wed-thu-fri)</td><td>30</td><td>90</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>4 (6x: all days except Sunday)</td><td>30</td><td>90</td><td>3</td></tr></tbody></table>

mon = Monday, wed = Wednesday, fri = Friday, thu = Thursday, sat = Saturday.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.t001
Four feeding regimes were defined and differed from the number of blood meals per week as well as the alternation of days: regime 1: 3 times (Monday-Wednesday-Friday), regime 2: 4 times (Monday-Wednesday-Friday-Saturday), regime 3: 4 times (Monday-Wednesday-Thursday-Friday) and regime 4: 6 times (all days except Sunday). Those alternations of days had been chosen according to the work plan in the insectary, in order to be able to apply the best treatment with the technicians. Three cages by treatment were set and each cage contained 30 females and 10 males (Table 1).

## Fecundity and reproductive biology

Mating cages were placed in individual larviposition cups and pupae were collected daily (except Sundays) and sorted into normal and aborted L3. The normal pupae were weighed using an electronic balance of 0.0001 mg sensitivity and automatic calibration (Sartorius MSE2 7S-000-DM Cubis Ultra). The production of pupae was recorded daily per feeding regime and per cage. The first larval period (time between female emergence and the production of the first pupae) and the pupae produced per initial female (PPIF) was also recorded.

## Male and female adult mortality

Mortality was recorded daily (except on Sundays) for each treatment and per cage until 60 days after emergence. Dead flies were sorted into blood-fed and starved fly mortalities.

## Flight ability assessment in the insectarium

In the framework of the supplying in the sterile males to the ongoing AW-IPM program in Senegal, a standard quality control protocol was applied at the IBD. Flight ability data of *G. p. gambiensis* colony fed 4 times per week were collected from March to November 2019. Sterile males pupae are shipped twice per week to Senegal and at each shipment, 100 pupae were put in Petri dishes covered by a flight cylinder, i.e. a PVC tube 10 cm high and 8.4 cm in diameter [19,20]. The inner wall of the cylinder was coated with unscented talcum powder to prevent the flies from crawling out. Flies flying out of the tube were considered as “operational flies” (i.e. available for the SIT) [19,20]. This control protocol is to evaluate the quality of sterile males that is a quality indicator of the IBD *G. p. gambiensis* colony.

## Statistical analysis

The R Software (version 4.0.3) [21] using RStudio (RStudio, PBC. Boston, MA, USA, 2020) was used to perform the statistical analyses and the figures. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test the normality of data and the Tukey's test was applied. If the data was not normally distributed the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used then transformed to be normally distributed using the transform Tukey function in the *rcompanion* package [22]. The survival of flies was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and were compared using the coxme model [23] where the cage number was considered as a random effect, the feeding regime, the sex and their second order interactions were used as explanatory variables and survival rate as the response variable. The significant interactions were analyzed using the emmeans function (in package *emmeans*) [24]. A Generalized linear mixed effect model was used to analyze the number of pupae produced per initial female (PPIF) (with a Poisson distribution) and the pupal mass after 60 days of emergence (with a Gaussian distribution) [25] where the feeding regime, the cage and their interactions were considered as fixed variables. Differences between the levels of significant fixed factors were analyzed using post hoc Tukey tests (glht function in
package *multcomp*) [26]. All tests were done at the 5% significance level. The data analysis details are available as supplementary file (S1 Data).

## Data accessibility

The complete data sets are available in S1–S4 Tables.

## Results

### Mortality

Overall dead flies (males and females), 2.82% had blood in the abdomen and 97.17% had starved. The statistical analysis showed that there was no link between the number of deaths with or without blood in the insect's abdomen and the feeding regime and sex (P > 0.05).

The mortality rate was significantly influenced by the feeding regime ($X_3^2 = 20.87, P < 0.001$, Fig 1) and the sex ($X_1^2 = 43.95, P < 0.001$, Fig 1). Moreover, the interaction between sex and feeding regime was significant ($X_1^2 = 15.76, P = 0.001$), showing that the effect of the feeding regime was not the same on the survival of females and males. Indeed, females survived significantly longer than males, irrespective of the feeding regime (P < 0.001; Table 2). For the females, the comparison between feeding regimes showed that the mortality rate was similar between flies fed 4 times a week (feeding regimes 2 and 3) and flies fed 6 times a week (feeding regime 4) (P > 0.2). While, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the feeding regime 1 (3 blood meals by week) compared to 3 other feeding regimes (P < 0.002; Table 2). For the males, the survival was similar between the feeding regimes (P > 0.1; Table 2). The day alternation in the 4 blood meals per week had no effect on tsetse fly mortality.

### Productivity

The first larva was deposited on average on day 20 for the feeding regimes 2, 3 and 4 (4 and 6 blood meals by week) and 24 hours after for the feeding regime 1 (day 21) (3 meals by week). The results indicated that at 60 days, the highest fecundity was observed for the feeding

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig 1. Survival curves of flies maintained on different feeding regimes and by sex.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.g001
<table><caption>Table 2. Summary of the best cox model for the survival of flies per sex after 60 days.</caption><thead><tr><th>Fixed effect</th><th>coef</th><th>exp(coef)</th><th>se(coef)</th><th>z-value</th><th>Pr(&gt;|z|)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>Females</strong></td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 2</td><td>-0.7788</td><td>0.4589</td><td>0.2119</td><td>-3.68</td><td>0.0002***</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 3</td><td>-0.7020</td><td>0.4956</td><td>0.2121</td><td>-3.31</td><td>0.0009***</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 4</td><td>-0.5234</td><td>0.5925</td><td>0.2061</td><td>-2.54</td><td>0.011*</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>Males</strong></td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 2</td><td>-0.0622</td><td>0.9397</td><td>0.3771</td><td>-0.17</td><td>0.870</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 3</td><td>-0.3085</td><td>0.7346</td><td>0.3834</td><td>-0.80</td><td>0.420</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 4</td><td>0.6188</td><td>1.8567</td><td>0.3743</td><td>1.65</td><td>0.098.</td></tr></tbody></table>

The feeding regime 1 (3 blood meals per week) is here considered as the reference level.

Abbreviation: Coef, coefficient; SE, standard error.

Significance:

***P ≤ 0.001;

* P ≤ 0.05 (these apply to values above).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.t002

<table><caption>Table 3. Fixed-effects coefficients of a mixed-effect Gaussian model of the impact of the number of blood meals by week and the alternation of days on the number of pupae produced per initial female (PPIF) and pupal mass after 60 days.</caption><thead><tr><th>Trait</th><th>Fixed effect</th><th>Estimate</th><th>Standard Error</th><th>z-value</th><th>Pr(&gt;|z|)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4">PPIF</td><td>(Intercrpt)</td><td>1.0573</td><td>0.0621</td><td>17.018</td><td>&lt; 2e-16***</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 2</td><td>0.2083</td><td>0.0836</td><td>2.491</td><td>0.0128*</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 3</td><td>0.3338</td><td>0.0814</td><td>4.101</td><td>4.11e-05***</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 4</td><td>0.3089</td><td>0.0818</td><td>3.776</td><td>0.00016***</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Pupal mass</td><td>(Intercrpt)</td><td>222.9581</td><td>2.4728</td><td>90.166</td><td>&lt;2e-16***</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 2</td><td>-2.1771</td><td>3.3667</td><td>-0.647</td><td>0.5180</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 3</td><td>-0.3749</td><td>3.2692</td><td>-0.115</td><td>0.9087</td></tr><tr><td>feeding regime 4</td><td>8.8992</td><td>3.2715</td><td>2.715</td><td>0.007**</td></tr></tbody></table>

The feeding regime 1 (3 blood meals per week) is here considered as the reference level.

Significance:

***P ≤ 0.001;

** P ≤ 0.01;

* P ≤ 0.05 (these apply to values above).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.t003

regime 3 (4 blood meals by week) (2.73 ± 1.32 PPIF). However, this did not differ significantly from the feeding regimes 2 (2.47 ± 1.31) and 4 (2.69 ± 1.28) (fed 4 and 6 times by week respectively, P > 0.3; Table 3). The lowest fecundity was observed for the feeding regime 1 (3 blood meals by week) (2.05 ± 1.36 PPIF) that was significantly different from the three others (P < 0.04; Fig 2; Table 3). The pupal mass was statistically similar between feeding regimes 1, 2 and 3 (P > 0.5; Table 3) and significantly different to that of the feeding regime 4 (P < 0.03); mean (± SD) values of 24.00 ± 2.01, 23.85 ± 2.29, 23.97 ± 2.10, 24.10 ± 0.20 and 24.56 ± 2.08 mg were obtained for the feeding regimes 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively.

## Flight ability in the insectarium

The flight ability data of 4378 pupae were recorded from March to November 2019 after the passing from 3 to 4 blood meals per week to the full colonies. The proportion of operational
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 2.** Number of pupae produced per initial female (PPIF) after 60 days according to the number of blood meals per week and the alternation of the days. The red points give the mean PPIF for each batch.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.g002

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 3.** Percentages of operational flies (%) over the time. The orange line gives the trend of performance evolution over the time.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245503.g003

flies was increased with the time corresponding to an average of 6% improving of the quality of IBD colony (Fig 3).

**Discussion**

The aim of this study was to assess the survival and productivity of adult *G. p. gambiensis* flies in colony cages at different feeding regimes per week and at alternation of the days.

We observed a low proportion (2.82%) of dead flies with blood in the abdomen. This means that the blood used to feed the experimental flies was of good quality and did not cause the observed mortalities.
We found that female flies survived significantly longer than males irrespective of the treatment. The similar results were obtained in previous studies under temperature variations with the same species, *G. p. gambiensis* [27] and with mosquitoes, such as *Anopheles arabiensis*, *An. funestus* [28] and *Aedes albopictus* [29]. The difference in lifespan between the sexes is common in insects and it seems to be genetically determined [30].

The results showed that under 25°C, the survival and productivity of flies that had 3 blood meals per week were lower than those fed 4 or 6 times per week. Our results are in line with the previously obtained data on *G. pallidipes* and *G. morsitans morsitans* [31]. This previous study on feeding regime in relation to reproduction showed a positive correlation between feeding regime and adult survival and fecundity. Indeed, a minimum number of blood meals per cycle (an inter-larval period of 9 days) which did not cause a decline in reproductive performance was 4 times for *G. m. morsitans* and five for *G. pallidipes* [31]. According to Gaston and Randolph (1993), the flies fed every third day, always engorged fully at every opportunity, whereas, flies offered food every second day refused to feed at all or did not engorge fully at every opportunity [32]. Our results confirm the previous study showing that in the laboratory, female flies which take a full blood meal every third day perform less (survival and productivity) than those which take on average rather smaller blood meals every second day [31,32]. Indeed, experiments carried out on *G. morsitans* showed that the greater proportion of larger meals is taken on day 7 of the inter-laval period [33,34] corresponding to the time of rapid larval growth [32]. This meal that is critical for normal larval development, could explain the better productivity observed with flies fed 4 times per week than those fed 3 times, since with the 4 meals, the flies have more opportunity to have meal at the critical time.

In other tsetse facilities in Europe as at the FAO/IAEA Insect Pest Control Laboratory (IPCL) in Seibersdorf, Austria and the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) in Bratislava, Slovakia where the same species *G. p. gambiensis* is reared but not massively as that of IBD, 3 days feeding per week is used with acceptable production [12]. However, the use of the same 3 days feeding per week for the same tsetse species at the IBD and at the CIRDES facilities in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso [35] and for *G. pallidipes* at the Ethiopian Tsetse Eradication Project (STEP) facility [36], doesn't allow to reach the objective of production. Indeed, a reduction of the feeding frequency from 6 to 4 times per week for the CIRDES mass rearing colony of *G. p. gambiensis* [35] and an increasing from 3 to 5 meals per pregnancy cycle of the STEP mass rearing colony of *G. pallidipes* [36] had been demonstrated. Our results are in agreement with the findings by these authors who observed also that 3 blood meals per week affecting the mass rearing production (high mortality and low fecundity). Indeed, the quality of the blood used for the feeding could be the difference between European and African insectariums. The waiting period of veterinary drugs before the slaughter of the animal is well respected in Europe, which is not the same everywhere in Africa, so some drug residues could end up in the blood and impact the quality of the production, despite the biological feeding test that eliminates very poor quality blood (Quality Factor <1, [12,37]).

Following our results, 4 blood meals per week (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday) was applied to the full colonies at IBD (Instead of 3 meals per week, Monday, Wednesday and Friday) since December 2018, reducing then female mortality, increasing colony productivity and size. However, the young flies (less than one week old) are fed additionally on Wednesday and Saturday. As a reminder, in the framework of the ongoing elimination program in Senegal, an agreement was made with the IBD to mass-produce *G. p. gambiensis* to supply the sterile males needed for the SIT component of this AW-IPM program. Considering the *G. p. gambiensis* colony, the main target for this program, the size constituted of ~ 617,600 females on week 42 of 2019, corresponding to a weekly pupae collection of 130,400. Thus, the change of the feeding regime allowed increasing the number of sterile male pupae supplied to Senegal project from
less than 30,000 per week in December 2018 to more than 50,000 in June 2019 and contributed to reach the projected objective of receiving at ~ 50,000 sterile male pupae weekly.

Three to 4 meals per week would increase the quantity of blood used per week leading to an increase of the workload for the insectarium technical workers including blood collection at the slaughterhouse and the feeding activities. Indeed, with 617,000 females as colony size, around 50 liters of blood are used at each feeding. The cost of defibrinated and irradiated blood is less than 2 Euros per liter, i.e. a total cost of less than 80 Euros per day. From 30,000 sterile male pupae supplied to Senegal project per week in December 2018 to more than 50,000 in June 2019, the 20,000 pupae increase brings in 3,000 euros per week, without forgetting the 50% of females that will be re-injected into the colony. About the manpower for a day feeding, it should be noted that the staff of the IBD is not paid by the hour, but by monthly lump sum, therefore the increase in the number of meals does not lead to an increase in personnel costs. The additional charges would be related to depreciation of equipment and energy costs. However, an economic study will be necessary to verify the cost effectiveness of the production of sterile male flies according to the production systems in different facilities. For the performance of flies, a recent study carried out at CIRDES shown that the 4 meals per week gave a better flight ability than 3 meals per week [35]. Which supports the performance that we obtained with the IBD colony after the application of 4 meals per week, which has gradually improved over time, from 67% in March 2019 to 76.5% in November 2019 using pupae subjected to chilling (8 ± 2°C) for 24 to 72 hours followed by an irradiation treatment.

The number of blood meals per week was increased to 4 only and not 6 which gave similar results. Since 6 blood meals per week gave a similar survival and productivity, using a target 4 blood meals per week is thus more conservative.

## Conclusion

The best number of blood meals per week should be of 4 times for *G. p. gambiensis* to enhance its longevity and productivity. Thus, this mass-production improvement would allow the IBD to meet the needs for sterile males for the ongoing eradication program in Senegal and would give more capacity for the implementation of the future SIT programs in West Africa, such as in Burkina Faso and Chad.

## Supporting information

S1 Fig.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Database for the survival of flies maintained on different feeding regimes.

(CSV)

S2 Table. Database for the pupae produced per initial female after 60 days.

(CSV)

S3 Table. Database for the pupal mass after 60 days according to the number of blood meals by week.

(CSV)

S4 Table. Database for the flight ability assessment in the insectarium.

(CSV)

S1 Data.

(RMD)
**Acknowledgments**

We thank the managers of IBD-CETT for the excellent working conditions and all technicians in the IBD-CETT for their contributions to the success of this work. We thank Dr Thierry Lefevre for his assistance in the statistical analysis.

**Author Contributions**

**Conceptualization:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Gisèle Marie Sophie Ouedraogo/Sanou, Lassané Percoma, Issa Sidibé.

**Data curation:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Abdou Salam Belem.

**Formal analysis:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Abdou Salam Belem.

**Funding acquisition:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Issa Sidibé.

**Investigation:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé.

**Methodology:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera, Abdou Salam Belem, Adrien Marie Gaston Belem.

**Project administration:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Issa Sidibé.

**Resources:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Issa Sidibé.

**Software:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem.

**Supervision:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé.

**Validation:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Gisèle Marie Sophie Ouedraogo/Sanou, Lassané Percoma, Issa Sidibé.

**Visualization:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera, Abdou Salam Belem, Mamadou Ira, Bénéwendé Aristide Kaboré.

**Writing – original draft:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Abdou Salam Belem.

**Writing – review & editing:** Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Ange Irénée Toé, Sié Hermann Pooda, Kiswendsida Mikhailou Dera, Abdou Salam Belem, Adrien Marie Gaston Belem, Gisèle Marie Sophie Ouedraogo/Sanou, Mamadou Ira, Bénéwendé Aristide Kaboré, Lassané Percoma, Issa Sidibé.

**References**

1. Buxton PA. The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera). Lewis HK, editor. London, UK: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 1955.

2. Hursey BS, Slingenbergh J. The tsetse fly and its effects on agriculture in sub-saharan Africa. World Anim Rev. 1995; 2: 67–73.

3. Budd LT. DFID-Funded Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Research and Development Since 1980. United Kingdom: Department of International Development; 1999.

4. Cuisance D, Politzar H, Mérot P, Tamboura I. [Release of irradiated males in the integrated campaign against Glossina in the Sideradougou pastoral area (Burkina Faso)]. Rev Délevage Médecine Vét Pays Trop. 1984; 37: 449–467.

5. Takken V, Oladunmade MA, Dengwat L, Feldmann HU, Onah JA, Tenabe SO, et al. The eradication of Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera: Glossinidae) using traps, insecticide-impregnated targets and the sterile insect technique in central Nigeria. Bull Entomol Res. 1986; 76: 275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300014747

6. Vreysen MJB, Saleh KM, Ali MY, Abdulla AM, Zhu Z-R, Juma KG, et al. Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) Eradicated on the Island of Unguja, Zanzibar, Using the Sterile Insect Technique. J Econ Entomol. 2000; 93: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.1.123 PMID: 14658522
7. Kabayo JP. Aiming to eliminate tsetse from Africa. Trends Parasitol. 2002; 18: 473-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02371-1 PMID: 12473355

8. Percoma L, Sow A, Pagabeleguem S, Dicko AH, Serdebéogo O, Ouédraogo M, et al. Impact of an integrated control campaign on tsetse populations in Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors. 2018; 11: 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2609-3 PMID: 29703229

9. Bouyer J, Seck MT, Sall B, Ndiaye EY, Guerrini L, Vreysen MJB. Stratified Entomological Sampling in Preparation for an Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management Program: The Example of Glossina palpalis gambiensis (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the Niayes of Senegal. J Med Entomol. 2010; 47: 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1603/me09149 PMID: 20695269

10. Pagabeleguem S, Seck MT, Sall B, Vreysen MJB, Gimonneau G, Fall AG, et al. Long distance transport of irradiated male Glossina palpalis gambiensis pupae and its impact on sterile male yield. Parasit Vectors. 2015; 8: 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0869-3 PMID: 25927610

11. Bassène MD, Seck MT, Pagabeleguem S, Fall AG, Sall B, Vreysen MJB, et al. Competitiveness and survival of two strains of Glossina palpalis gambiensis in an urban area of Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017; 11: e0006172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006172 PMID: 29281634

12. FAO/IAEA. Standard operating procedures for mass-rearing tsetse flies. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2006. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/Tsetse_Rearing_SOP_web.pdf.

13. IAEA. Development of cost-effective diets for use in mass production of tsetse flies. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2000. Report No.: IAEA-314-D4-00CT02169. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/ipc-tsetse-diet.pdf.

14. Feldmann U. Guidelines for the rearing of tsetse flies using the membrane feeding technique. J. P. R. Ochieng'-Odero. Techniques of insect rearing for the development of integrated pest and vector management strategies. J. P. R. Ochieng'-Odero. Nairobi, Kenya: ICIPE Science Press.; 1994. p. 449-71.

15. Sellin E, Bourdoiseau G, Clair M, Cuisance D, Fevrier J, Taze Y, et al. Bilan de 4 années d'élevage de Glossina palpalis gambiensis Vanderplank 1949 (Diptera, Muscidae) à Bobo-Dioulasso (Haute-Volta), sur animaux nourriciers (lapins, cobayes). Rev Elev Med Veterinaire Pays Trop Fr. 1979; 32: 335-345.

16. Bauer B, Filledier J, Kabore I. Large scale rearing of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the C.R.T.A. Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina based on in vitro feeding techniques. Rev D'Elevage Médecine Vét Pays Trop. 1984; 37: 9-17. PMID: 6544970

17. Itard I. L'élevage de Glossina palpalis gambiensis Vanderplank, 1949 (Diptera- Muscidae) à Maisons-Alfort. Rev Délevage Médecine Vét Pays Trop. 1976; 29: 43-58.

18. Buxton PA, Lewis DJ. Climate and tsetse flies: laboratory studies upon Glossina submorsitans and tachinoides. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 1934; 175-242.

19. Diallo S, Seck MT, Rayaissé JB, Fall AG, Bassene MD, Sall B, et al. Chilling, irradiation and transport of male Glossina palpalis gambiensis pupae: Effect on the emergence, flight ability and survival. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0216802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216802 PMID: 31086401

20. Seck MT, Pagabeleguem S, Bassene MD, Fall AG, Diouf TAR, Sall B, et al. Quality of Sterile Male Tsetse after Long Distance Transport as Chilled, Irradiated Pupae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9: e0004229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004229 PMID: 26562521

21. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2019. http://www.r-project.org/index.html.

22. Mangiafico SS. Summary and Analysis of Extension Program Evaluation in R, version 1.18.1. Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Brunswick, NJ; 2016. https://rcompanion.org/documents/RHandbookProgramEvaluation.pdf.

23. Therneau TM. Mixed Effects Cox Models. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme.

24. Lenth RV, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Riebl H, Singmann H. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means, Version 1.5.3. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf.

25. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Package Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. 2014.

26. Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P. Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2011.

27. Pagabeleguem S, Ravel S, Dicko AH, Vreysen MJB, Parker A, Takac P, et al. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on survival and fecundity of three tsetse strains. Parasit Vectors. 2016; 9: 520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1805-x PMID: 27682638

28. Lyons CL, Coetzee M, Terblanche JS, Chown SL. Thermal limits of wild and laboratory strains of two African malaria vector species, Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Malar J. 2012; 11: 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-226 PMID: 22770378
29. Delatte H, Gimonneau G, Triboire A, Fontenille D. Influence of temperature on immature development, survival, longevity, fecundity, and gonotrophic cycles of Aedes albopictus, vector of chikungunya and dengue in the Indian Ocean. J Med Entomol. 2009; 46: 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1603/033.046.0105 PMID: 19198515

30. Tower J, Arbeitman M. The genetics of gender and life span. J Biol. 2009; 8: 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol141 PMID: 19439039

31. Langley PA, Stafford K. Feeding frequency in relation to reproduction in Glossina morsitans morsitans and G. pallidipes. Physiol Entomol. 1990; 15: 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1990.tb00530.x

32. Gaston KA, Randolph SE. Reproductive under-performance of tsetse flies in the laboratory, related to feeding frequency. Physiol Entomol. 1993; 18: 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00459.x

33. Langley PA, Pimley RW. Quantitative aspects of reproduction and larval nutrition in Glossina morsitans morsitans westw. (diptera, glossinidae) fed in vitro. Bull Entomol Res. 1975; 65: 129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485300005836

34. Langley PA, Pimley RW. Utilization of U14C amino acids or U14C protein by adult Glossina morsitans during in utero development of larva. J Insect Physiol. 1974; 20: 2157–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(74)90041-9 PMID: 4421619

35. Camara K, Ilboudo K, Salou E, Gimonneau G. Evaluation of Different Blood Feeding Frequencies on Glossina Palpalis Gambiensis Performance in A Mass Rearing Insectary. Parasit Vectors. 2020;Under revision: 12.

36. Tsegaye M, Meharenet B, Desta T, Lema B, Desalegni T, Shitu D. Feeding Frequency and its Related Effect on Productivity and Survival Rate of Glossina Pallidipes in Kality Tsetse Mass Rearing and Production Center for the Purpose of Sterile Insect Technique (SIT). Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2020; 28: 21313–21323. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2020.28.004604

37. De Beer CJ, Venter GJ, Vreysen MJB. Improving the Diet for the Rearing of Glossina brevipalpis News- tead and Glossina austeni Newstead: Blood Source and Collection—Processing—Feeding Proce- dures. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0168799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168799 PMID: 28006007