# First report of kdr mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in the arbovirus vector, Aedes aegypti, from Nouakchott, Mauritania

Mohamed Aly Ould Lemrabott, Sébastien Briolant, Nicolas Gomez, L. Basco, Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary

► To cite this version:

Mohamed Aly Ould Lemrabott, Sébastien Briolant, Nicolas Gomez, L. Basco, Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary. First report of kdr mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in the arbovirus vector, Aedes aegypti, from Nouakchott, Mauritania. Parasites & Vectors, 2023, 16 (1), pp.464. 10.1186/s13071-023-06066-8. hal-04509818

HAL Id: hal-04509818

https://hal.science/hal-04509818v1

Submitted on 18 Mar 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
BRIEF REPORT

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# First report of *kdr* mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in the arbovirus vector, *Aedes aegypti*, from Nouakchott, Mauritania

Mohamed Aly Ould Lemrabott¹, Sébastien Briolant²,³,⁴*, Nicolas Gomez²,³,⁴, Leonardo Basco²,³ and Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary¹,²*

## Abstract

**Background** Since 2014, dengue epidemics have occurred almost annually in Nouakchott, the capital city of Mauritania, coinciding with the recent establishment of *Aedes aegypti*, the primary vector of dengue, in the city. *Anopheles arabiensis*, the primary vector of malaria, is also abundant not only in Nouakchott but also in most areas of the country. Resistance to insecticides has been studied in *An. arabiensis* but not in *Ae. aegypti* in Mauritania. The objective of the present study was to establish the baseline data on the frequencies of knockdown resistance (*kdr*) mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel (*vgsc*) gene in *Ae. aegypti* collected in Nouakchott to improve vector control.

**Methods** Resting *Ae. aegypti* mosquitoes were collected in 2017 and 2018 in Teyarett and Dar Naim districts in Nouakchott using a battery-powered aspirator. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing were performed to detect the presence of five *kdr* mutations known to be associated with pyrethroid resistance: L982W, S989P, I1011M/G, V1016G/I, and F1534C.

**Results** A total of 100 female *Ae. aegypti* mosquitoes were identified among collected resting culicid fauna, of which 60% (60/100) were unfed, 12% (12/100) freshly blood-fed, and 28% (28/100) gravid. Among the mutations investigated in this study, 989P, 1016G, and 1534C were found to be widespread, with the frequencies of 0.43, 0.44, and 0.55, respectively. Mutations were not found in codons 982 and 1011. No other mutations were detected within the fragments analyzed in this study. Genotype distribution did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The most frequent co-occurring point mutation patterns among *Ae. aegypti* mosquitoes were the heterozygous individuals 989SP/1016VG/1534FC detected in 45.1% of mosquitoes. In addition, homozygous mutant 1534CC co-occurred simultaneously with homozygous wild type 989SS and 1016VV in 30.5% of mosquito specimens. Inversely, homozygous wild-type 1534FF co-occurred simultaneously with homozygous mutant 989PP and 1016GG in 19.5% of the mosquitoes.

**Conclusions** To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the presence of three point mutations in the *vgsc* gene of *Ae. aegypti* in Mauritania. The findings of the present study are alarming because they predict a high level

<footnote>*Correspondence:
Sébastien Briolant
s briolant@wanadoo.fr
Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary
alimedsalem@gmail.com
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides which are commonly used in vector control in the country. Therefore, further studies are urgently needed, in particular phenotypic characterization of insecticide resistance using the standardized test.

**Keywords** *Aedes aegypti*, Mauritania, Voltage-gated sodium channel, *kdr*, Point mutation, Pyrethroids

**Introduction**

Dengue is the most widespread mosquito-borne viral disease in the world [1]. In Mauritania, dengue has also been a significant public health problem since the first documented dengue outbreak in 2014 in Nouakchott, the capital city [2, 3]. The emergence of dengue coincided with the first detection of *Aedes aegypti* in the city [4]. Since 2014, dengue cases and outbreaks have been reported annually in Nouakchott and other urban settings, particularly in the Oasian city of Atar and the mining city of Zouérat in the northern Saharan zone [5-7].

*Aedes aegypti* is the major vector of dengue as well as three other arboviruses of public health importance, namely yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika [8]. This mosquito species is well adapted to thrive in urban environments where suitable human-made habitats for mosquito vectors exist and contact between mosquito vectors and human hosts is frequent, facilitating arbovirus transmission [9]. At present, there is no specific treatment for dengue. Only one licensed vaccine (Dengvaxia®) is currently available in several Asian and Latin American countries, but it is not recommended for the general population; it may be administered only in children (aged 9–16 years) with a previous history of dengue residing in endemic areas [10]. Vector control based on the reduction of larval habitats and space-spraying of insecticides remains the most common approach to reduce the incidence of dengue in the general population [11, 12].

Pyrethroids are insecticides most commonly used to control adult *Ae. aegypti* [13]. Knockdown resistance (*kdr*) is one of the most important mechanisms of resistance to pesticides documented globally in a large number of arthropods of medical importance [14]. Pyrethroids (e.g., deltamethrin, permethrin) and organochlorines (e.g., dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, DDT) are insecticides that trigger the *kdr* phenotype [15]. Mutations in the gene encoding voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) are associated with the *kdr* phenotype. Overall, 12 non-synonymous mutations varying in frequency, geographical distribution, and impact on resistance phenotype, have so far been detected across the world, of which six (V410L, L982W + F1534C, S989P, I1011M/V, V1016G/I, and F1534C) have been demonstrated to be associated with pyrethroid resistance in *Ae. aegypti* [13, 16]. The mutations S989P, I1011M or V, V1016G or I, and F1534C occur within domains II and III of VGSC. Recent

studies have shown that three of these mutations, 1016G, 1016I, and 1534C, are widely distributed and detected in pyrethroid-resistant populations of *Aedes* mosquitoes in several African countries, including Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, and Ghana [17–22].

Historically, the first vector control program targeting malaria vector in Mauritania was implemented in the early 1990s. It was first based on the promotion of the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), and then a few years later, long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) were introduced to replace the conventional ITNs. Mass distribution of pyrethroid-impregnated (deltamethrin and permethrin) mosquito nets has been the main vector control intervention since 1997. Indoor residual spraying and larval control are also part of the priorities recently identified in the national malaria control policy, but they have not yet received the necessary funding for their implementation. Studies assessing the impact of LLINs in reducing the incidence of malaria and other vector-borne diseases in the country are lacking.

Among mosquitoes of medical importance, the phenotypic and molecular basis of resistance to insecticides has been studied in the malaria vector *Anopheles arabiensis* but not in *Ae. aegypti* in Mauritania [23, 24]. The present study assessed the frequencies of six point mutations known to confer pyrethroid resistance in *Ae. aegypti* collected in Nouakchott in 2017–2018, i.e., 3 years after the first documented dengue outbreak following the detection of the arboviral vector in the city [2, 4], with the objective of establishing baseline data for future arbovirus surveillance and vector control strategies.

**Methods**

**Study sites**

The study was part of the entomological surveillance of malaria and dengue vectors in Nouakchott, the capital city of Mauritania. It was carried out in the districts of Dar Naim and Teyarett located in northern and north-eastern areas of Nouakchott. A detailed description of the study sites was presented in our earlier works [4, 23, 25]. In Teyarett and Dar Naim, malaria is known to be endemic, and several epidemiological, parasitological, and entomological studies on malaria in Nouakchott have been conducted in these two districts [25–28]. Teyarett was also the epicenter of the first dengue outbreak that occurred in Mauritania in 2014. Dengue cases have been
reported from the district of Dar Naim as well. Based on clinical reports of dengue fever occurring in Nouakchott, entomological monitoring of *Ae. aegypti*, the most probable vector of dengue, was initiated in these two districts 3 years (i.e., from 2017) after the first detection of this mosquito species in Nouakchott.

## Mosquito sampling

A battery-powered Prokopack aspirator (John W. Hock Company, Gainsville, FL, USA) was used to collect indoor resting culicid fauna. The collection was carried out during the morning (between 07:00 and 09:00) for one to four consecutive days per month in each site (five houses/site and two rooms per house). Overall, mosquitoes were collected from March to June 2017 and during the month of September 2018. Upon collection, mosquitoes were euthanized by placing them in a -20 °C freezer. They were then sorted by species and sex using appropriate taxonomic keys [29]. Female *Ae. aegypti* were further classified according to abdominal status (unfed, fed, semi-gravid, or gravid), then stored at -80 °C until use for *kdr* genotyping.

## Genotyping *kdr*

*Aedes aegypti* specimens were placed in microtubes with 5-mm diameter stainless steel beads for use with the TissueLyser system (Qiagen S.A.S., Courtaboeuf, France) and 205 µl of lysis buffer (25 µl of proteinase K and 180 µl of T1 buffer in the NucleoSpin® 96 tissue core kit). Specimens were crushed in the TissueLyser II (Qiagen S.A.S., Courtaboeuf, France) with three cycles of 1 min at a frequency of 30/s separated by 20 s of pause time. Samples were incubated at 70 °C for 1 h. Mosquito DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin® 96 tissue core kit (Macherey Nagel AG, Oensingen, Switzerland) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Two fragments of the *vgsc* gene were amplified in two separate polymerase chain reactions (PCR) using primer pairs designed with Geneious Prime software version 2022.2.2 (https://www.geneious.com). In the reaction of the first fragment, primer pairs *vgsc* 20-21 F (forward primer, 5'-CTGCCACGGTGGAACTTC A-3') and *vgsc* 20-21 R (reverse primer, 5'-TTGTTC GTTTCGTTGTCGGC-3'; 0.25 µM each) were used to genotype L982W, S989P, I1011M/G, and V1016G/I codons. For the second fragment, primer pairs *vgsc* 28 F (forward primer, 5'-GTGGGAAAGCAGCCGATT C-3') and *vgsc* 28 R (reverse primer, 5'-CCTAGGCCG TGGAATAGCTT-3'; 0.375 µM each) were used to genotype F1534C codon. The primer pairs and 3 µl of eluted DNA template were added to PCR master mix containing DreamTaq DNA polymerase, buffer, 2 mM MgCl₂, and deoxyribose nucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (Thermo

Fisher DreamTaq™ Green PCR Master Mix; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). The thermal cycler (T1 Biometra, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) was programmed as follows: initial step of 95 °C for 5 min, then 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 59 °C (annealing temperature) for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by an extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The quality of PCR products was checked by visualizing under ultraviolet light the presence of a band of expected sizes (304 base pairs [bp] and 241 bp for the first and second *vgsc* gene fragments, respectively) after agarose gel electrophoresis.

Purification of PCR products and sequencing were outsourced to Biofidal Themis (Vaulx-en-Velin, France). Each fragment was sequenced from both 5' and 3' ends. The sequences were aligned and compared with those of GenBank accession nos. MK977832.1 and MF794973.1 using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA, version 10) software.

## Statistical analysis

Data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Office Excel 2007, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The proportions of unfed, fed, and gravid resting females were compared using Fisher's exact test. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for observed genotype frequencies for each *kdr* mutation was calculated using the Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at *P* < 0.05. All data were analyzed using Excel software or MedCalc® statistical software version 20.115 (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org; 2022).

## Results

A total of 100 *Ae. aegypti* female adults were collected in 2017 (n=50) and 2018 (n=50) during the entomological surveillance of *Anopheles* and *Aedes* mosquitoes in Tayarett and Dar Naim districts of Nouakchott.

The abdominal status of the resting female mosquitoes is summarized in Table 1. Sixty (60%) resting female *Aedes* mosquitoes were unfed, 28 (28%) were gravid, and 12 (12%) were freshly blood-fed.

<table><caption>**Table 1** Abdominal status of resting female *Aedes aegypti* mosquitoes collected in Nouakchott, Mauritania</caption><thead><tr><td>Abdominal status</td><td>Number</td><td>Frequency</td><td>P-value<sup>b</sup></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Unfed</td><td>60</td><td>0.60</td><td rowspan="3">0.005</td></tr><tr><td>Freshly blood-fed</td><td>12</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Gravid<sup>a</sup></td><td>28</td><td>0.28</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>100</td><td>1.00</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup> Including half-gravid female</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup> Comparison of frequencies between unfed and gravid female *Ae. aegypti* mosquitoes</footnote>
## Kdr genotyping

Table 2 presents the results of *vgsc* genotyping. All successfully genotyped mosquitoes were homozygous wild-type (i.e., monomorphic) for the *kdr* codons 982 (n=81) and 1011 (n=85). The three remaining *kdr* point mutations, 989P, 1016G, and 1534C, were found among the investigated *Aedes* mosquitoes with allelic frequencies of 0.43, 0.44, and 0.55, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the frequencies of *kdr* point mutations in *Aedes* mosquitoes collected in 2017 compared with those collected in 2018 (P=0.55, Fisher's exact test).

Genotype distribution did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at any of the three codons (i.e., S989P, V1016G, and F1534C). The most frequent genotypes detected were heterozygous 1534FC, 989SP, and 1016VG, with frequency of 48%, 41%, and 39%, respectively. The homozygous wild-type 1534FF and the homozygous mutant-type 1016GG and 989PP had the lowest frequencies (18%, 17%, and 16%, respectively).

## Haplotypes

The combination of *kdr* mutations in three polymorphic codons (i.e., S989P, V1016G, and F1534C) was analyzed, and the results are presented in Fig. 1. Six (22.2%) of 27 possible allelic combinations were observed among *Aedes* mosquitoes. Of 82 mosquitoes that were successfully genotyped, 37 (45.1%) were heterozygous for three mutations (i.e., 989SP/1016VG/1534FC), 25 (30.5%) were single-mutant for the 1534C allele (989SS/1016VV/1534CC), and 16 (19.5%) were double-mutant with 989P and

1016G mutations (989PP/1016GG/1534FF). None were homozygous wild-type (989SS/1016VV/1534FF) or homozygous mutant-type (989PP/1016GG/1534CC).

## Discussion

The present study was conducted to determine the frequencies of *kdr* mutations in adult female *Ae. aegypti* collected a few years after the establishment of the arbovirus vector in Nouakchott. The collection of indoor resting female mosquitoes showed that a high proportion of *Aedes* mosquitoes were unfed. Studies conducted in Asia and Latin America showed that *Ae. aegypti* populations are typically endophagic and endophilic, resting and feeding in human habitations [30, 31]; in West Africa, however, studies revealed a broader range of resting behaviors [32–34]. For instance, studies conducted in Niger showed endophilic and endophagic behavior of *Ae. aegypti* populations [32], while in Ghana and Senegal, *Ae. aegypti* populations were collected mostly outdoors rather than indoors [33, 34]. In the present study, *Ae. aegypti* exhibited a similar behavior as that reported from Senegal and Ghana, but given the low number of unfed mosquitoes, a solid conclusion cannot be drawn at present. However, this finding is important for vector control strategies and points to the need for more in-depth studies on the bioecology of *Ae. aegypti* in Mauritania.

Furthermore, we analyzed the prevalence of *kdr* mutations in the *vgsc* gene of individual *Ae. aegypti* mosquitoes in Nouakchott. Two major African-type *kdr* mutations strongly linked to pyrethroid resistance,

<table><caption>**Table 2** Allelic and genotypic frequencies of *kdr* mutations in female *Aedes aegypti* mosquitoes, Nouakchott, Mauritania</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Year</th><th rowspan="2">Number</th><th rowspan="2">kdr allele</th><th colspan="4">N (%)</th><th rowspan="2">Frequency<sup>a</sup></th><th rowspan="2">χ<sup>2</sup> HWE</th><th rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr><tr><th>SS</th><th>SR</th><th>RR</th><th>UI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">2017</td><td rowspan="5">50</td><td>L982W</td><td>37 (74)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>13 (26)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>S989P</td><td>18 (36)</td><td>18 (36)</td><td>5 (10)</td><td>9 (18)</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.87</td></tr><tr><td>I1011M</td><td>41 (82)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>9 (18)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>V1016G</td><td>17 (34)</td><td>16 (32)</td><td>5 (10)</td><td>12 (24)</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.69</td></tr><tr><td>F1534C</td><td>6 (12)</td><td>22 (44)</td><td>18 (36)</td><td>4 (8)</td><td>0.63</td><td>1.44</td><td>0.23</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">2018</td><td rowspan="5">50</td><td>L982W</td><td>44 (88)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>6 (12)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>S989P</td><td>10 (20)</td><td>23 (46)</td><td>11 (22)</td><td>6 (12)</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>I1011M</td><td>44 (88)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>6 (12)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>V1016G</td><td>10 (20)</td><td>23 (46)</td><td>12 (24)</td><td>5 (10)</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.87</td></tr><tr><td>F1534C</td><td>12 (24)</td><td>26 (52)</td><td>9 (18)</td><td>3 (6)</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.58</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">2017–2018</td><td rowspan="5">100</td><td>L982W</td><td>81 (81)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>19 (19)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>S989P</td><td>28 (28)</td><td>41 (41)</td><td>16 (16)</td><td>15 (15)</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>I1011M</td><td>85 (85)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>0 (0)</td><td>15 (15)</td><td>0</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td></tr><tr><td>V1016G</td><td>27 (27)</td><td>39 (39)</td><td>17 (17)</td><td>17 (17)</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.67</td></tr><tr><td>F1534C</td><td>18 (18)</td><td>48 (48)</td><td>27 (27)</td><td>7 (7)</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.69</td></tr></tbody></table>

S, susceptible; R, resistant; UI, uninterpretable; *kdr*, knockdown resistance; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at 5% significance level; NA, not applicable

<footnote><sup>a</sup> Frequency of mutant allele</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** The combinations of *kdr* point mutations S989P, V1016G, and F1534C in adult female *Aedes aegypti* mosquitoes in Nouakchott, Mauritania</figcaption></figure>

1016G and 1534C, were found in *Ae. aegypti* analyzed in this study with high allelic frequencies: 1016G (0.44) and 1534C (0.55). For the first time, the Asian-type *kdr* mutation linked to pyrethroid resistance 989P [35] was found in Mauritanian *Ae. aegypti* with high allelic frequency (0.43). More interestingly, a high proportion (45.1%) of *Aedes* mosquitoes harbored the triple mutations 989SP/1016VG/1534FC with the heterozygous status, suggesting a potentially high level of resistance to pyrethroids. Similar findings were reported from Myanmar [36]. However, in a study conducted in Senegal [37], no mutations in the *vgsc* gene associated with pyrethroid resistance were found despite the phenotypic resistance to pyrethroids observed in *Ae. aegypti* populations. In

that study, insecticide resistance of *Ae. aegypti* population was found to be associated with a remarkably high (20- to 70-fold) overexpression of the major detoxification genes, suggesting that insecticide resistance in investigated *Ae. aegypti* specimens was likely to be mediated by metabolic mechanisms. In another study conducted in Cape Verde [38], many of the mutations commonly associated with insecticide resistance, including V1016G/I, S989P, and F1534C, were detected in *Ae. aegypti* screened samples, but insecticide resistance/susceptibility phenotype was not determined in that study. However, in two West African countries, Ghana and Burkina Faso, two of the mutations detected in the present study (F1534C and V1016G) were found at a high frequency
among pyrethroid-resistant Ae. aegypti populations [19, 20, 39, 40]. These findings on high frequencies of *kdr* mutations are not surprising since pyrethroids remain the most commonly used class of insecticides in vector control worldwide [41].

Studies on *kdr* mutations in Ae. aegypti in West Africa are still scarce. However, point mutations reported here, in particular F1534C and V1016G, have been shown to play an important role in conferring insecticide resistance to local *Aedes* mosquitoes. Indeed, since its first detection in Ae. aegypti populations from Ghana [42], *Aedes* mosquitoes with the F1534C mutation have been spreading in Africa. This mutation has since then been reported from Côte d'Ivoire [18], Cameroon [43], Angola, and Cape Verde [20]. In Burkina Faso, the F1534C substitution was found to be almost fixed in the populations of Ae. aegypti in the capital city, Ouagadougou [39]. Concomitant presence of these point mutations was also reported to strongly increase the level of pyrethroid resistance in individual mosquitoes [44]. In our study, high proportions of female *Aedes* mosquitoes displayed double or triple mutations, possibly implying a high level of pyrethroid resistance [45].

In our study, we observed that homozygous wild-type genotypes at codon 1534 co-occurred with homozygous mutants at 989P and 1016G, and vice versa. This finding makes it more important to look for the other mutations present in domains II and III of VGSC in *Aedes*. In Asia, but not yet in Africa, novel mutations have been reported to be associated with pyrethroid resistance: A1007G [46], T1520I [47], and F1534L [48]. In our study, we did not observe F1534L and A1007G. Future studies in Africa should include monitoring of these mutations.

In Mauritania, the first report of Ae. aegypti in Nouakchott dates back to 2014 [4]. However, this situation alone cannot explain the potentially high frequencies of *kdr* mutations observed among Ae. aegypti mosquitoes collected 3 years later in two districts of Nouakchott. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that *Aedes* mosquitoes harboring different *kdr* point mutations may have been introduced in Nouakchott from other sites or countries, followed by cross-mating between them, resulting in highly heterogeneous mosquito populations. However, the unknown impact and contribution of vector control campaigns through aerial spraying of insecticide carried out in recent years to reduce mosquito nuisance, particularly in Nouakchott, cannot be overlooked [28].

With the rapid and disorganized urbanization process that Nouakchott has been experiencing over the past 20 years, along with the rapidly growing human population and massive importation of second-hand tires resulting from the growing demand of used cars imported from Europe, Nouakchott offers an environment that

is conducive to maintaining the habitats of Ae. aegypti. Indeed, studies from Kenya and Tanzania showed that tires provide good breeding sites for *Aedes* mosquitoes and are responsible for producing > 30% of immatures collected from larval habitats in urban areas [49, 50]. The alarming findings of the present study call for an effective vector control strategy based on reinforced entomological surveillance, integrated approaches to control both larval and adult stages of *Aedes* mosquitoes, and fully engaged community-led actions.

The main limitations of the present study are that the insecticide resistance/susceptibility phenotype of genotyped mosquitoes was not assessed during the study to correlate the observed genotypes with their corresponding insecticide resistance phenotypes and that the recently detected V410L *kdr* mutation associated with high levels of resistance to both types I and II of pyrethroids was not searched [51]. Another limitation was that our sample size was small.

## Conclusions

This is the first report on the presence of *kdr* mutations in Ae. aegypti from Mauritania since this mosquito species was established in Nouakchott. The findings of the present study are alarming because they predict a high level of resistance to pyrethroids in the Ae. aegypti population found in the capital city. Further studies are urgently needed, in particular phenotypic characterization of insecticide resistance using the standardized test in parallel with genotyping more recent collection of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. Furthermore, as insecticide resistance negatively impacts vector control, regular surveillance of the resistance/susceptibility status of the mosquito vector population should be implemented, with a primary focus on the chemical insecticides used in vector control in Mauritania.

### Abbreviations

bp Base pairs

DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

dNTP Deoxyribose nucleoside triphosphate

ITN Insecticide-treated nets

*kdr* Knockdown resistance

LLIN Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets

MEGA Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis

PCR Polymerase chain reaction

VGSC Voltage-gated sodium channel

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all inhabitants of the households in the districts of Teyarett and Dar Naim where mosquitoes were collected for their collaboration.

### Author contributions

AOMSB, SB and LKB conceived and designed the study. MAOL carried out the field work. SB designed and NG carried out molecular analysis. SB, LKB and
AOMSB analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Funding

Not applicable.

## Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

## Declarations

### Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study did not involve humans and related data or experiments on either endangered or protected animal species. Therefore, ethical approval was not required for this study. However, the study protocol was carefully explained to the heads of each household in which mosquito samples were collected before obtaining their informed oral consent.

### Consent for publication

Not applicable.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Author details

¹Université de Nouakchott, UR-GEMI, Nouveau Campus Universitaire, BP 5026, Nouakchott, Mauritania. ²Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, Marseille, France. ³IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France. ⁴Unité de Parasitologie Entomologie, Département de Microbiologie et Maladies Infectieuses, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Marseille, France.

Received: 7 June 2023 Accepted: 20 November 2023

Published online: 19 December 2023

## References

1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:504–7.

2. Mint Mohamed Lemine A, Ould Lemrabott MA, Hasni Ebou M, Mint Lekweiry K, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Ould Brahim K, et al. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Mauritania: a review of their biodiversity, distribution and medical importance. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:35.

3. Fourié T, El Bara A, Dubot-Pérès A, Grard G, Briolant S, Basco LK, et al. Emergence of dengue virus serotype 2 in Mauritania and molecular characterization of its circulation in West Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009829.

4. Mint Lekweiry K, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Ould Brahim K, Ould Lemrabott MA, Brengues C, Faye O, et al. *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: culicidae) in Mauritania: first report on the presence of the arbovirus mosquito vector in Nouakchott. J Med Entomol. 2015;52:730–3.

5. World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. WHO Health Emergencies Programme. Weekly bulletin on outbreaks and other emergencies. Week 27, 1–7 July; 2017 https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/disease-outbreaks/outbreaks-and-other-emergencies-updates. Accessed 01 June 2023.

6. World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. WHO Health Emergencies Programme. Weekly bulletin on outbreaks and other emergencies. Week 15, 7–13 Apr 2018; https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/disease-outbreaks/outbreaks-and-other-emergencies-updates. Accessed 01 June 2023.

7. World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. WHO Health Emergencies Programme. Weekly bulletin on outbreaks and other emergencies. Week 39, 21–27 September, 2020 https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/disease-outbreaks/outbreaks-and-other-emergencies-updates. Accessed 01 June 2023.

8. Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC, Monath TP, Heymann DL, Scott TW. Epidemic arboviral diseases: priorities for research and public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e101–6.

9. Wilke ABB, Vasquez C, Carvajal A, Medina J, Chase C, Cardena G, et al. Proliferation of *Aedes aegypti* in urban environments mediated by the availability of key aquatic habitats. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12925.

10. Pintado Silva J, Fernandez-Sesma A. Challenges on the development of a dengue vaccine: a comprehensive review of the state of the art. J Gen Virol. 2023;104:001831.

11. Dusfour I, Vontas J, David JP, Weetman D, Fonseca DM, Corbel V, et al. Management of insecticide resistance in the major *Aedes* vectors of arboviruses: advances and challenges. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007615.

12. Ritchie SA, Devine GJ, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Lenhart AE, Manrique-Saide P, Scott TW. Insecticide-Based Approaches for Dengue Vector Control. In: Ecology and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases. Wageningen, Netherland: Wageningen Academic Publishers. 2021.59–89.

13. Fan Y, O'Grady P, Yoshimizu M, Ponlawat A, Kaufman PE, Scott JG. Evidence for both sequential mutations and recombination in the evolution of kdr alleles in *Aedes aegypti*. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008154.

14. Smith LB, Kasai S, Scott JG. Pyrethroid resistance in *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus*: Important mosquito vectors of human diseases. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2016;133:1–12.

15. Coats JR. Mechanisms of toxic action and structure-activity relationships for organochlorine and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides. Environ Health Perspect. 1990;87:255–62. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9087255.

16. Moyes CL, Vontas J, Martins AJ, Ng LC, Koou SY, Dusfour I, et al. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major *Aedes* vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005625.

17. Kamgang B, Yougang AP, Tchoupo M, Riveron JM, Wondji C. Temporal distribution and insecticide resistance profile of two major arbovirus vectors *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* in Yaoundé, the capital city of Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:469.

18. Konan LY, Oumbouke WA, Silué UG, Coulibaly IZ, Ziogba JT, N'Guessan RK, et al. Insecticide resistance patterns and mechanisms in *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: culicidae) populations across Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire reveal emergent pyrethroid resistance. J Med Entomol. 2021;58:1808–16.

19. Toé HK, Zongo S, Guelbeogo MW, Kamgang B, Viana M, Tapsoba M, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance and first evidence of V410L kdr mutation in *Aedes* (Stegomyia) *aegypti* (Linnaeus) from Burkina Faso. Med Vet Entomol. 2022;36:309–19.

20. Ayres CFJ, Seixas G, Borrego S, Marques C, Monteiro I, Marques CS, et al. The V410L knockdown resistance mutation occurs in island and continental populations of *Aedes aegypti* in West and Central Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008216.

21. Abdulai A, Owusu-Asenso CM, Akosah-Brempong G, Mohamed AR, Sraku IK, Attah SK, et al. Insecticide resistance status of *Aedes aegypti* in southern and northern Ghana. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16:135.

22. Djiappi-Tchamen B, Nana-Ndjangwo MS, Mavridis K, Talipouo A, Nchoutpouen E, Makoudjou I, et al. Analyses of insecticide resistance genes in *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* mosquito populations from Cameroon. Genes. 2021;12:828.

23. Mint Mohamed Lemine A, Ould Lemrabott MA, Niang EHA, Basco LK, Bogreau H, Faye O, et al. Pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector *Anopheles arabiensis* in Nouakchott, Mauritania. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:344.

24. Ould Lemrabott MA, Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Ould Brahim K, Brengues C, Rossignol M, Bogreau H et al. Seasonal abundance, blood meal sources and insecticide susceptibility in major anopheline malaria vectors from southern Mauritania. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:232.

25. Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Basco LK, Ouldabdallahi M, Mint Lekweiry K, Konaté L, Faye O, et al. Malaria-associated morbidity during the rainy season in Saharan and Sahelian zones in Mauritania. Acta Trop. 2015;152:1–7.

26. Lekweiry KM, Abdallahi MO, Ba H, Arnathau C, Durand P, Trape JF, et al. Preliminary study of malaria incidence in Nouakchott. Mauritania Malar J. 2009;8:92.

27. Ould Ahmedou Salem MS, Mint Lekweiry K, Mint Deida J, Ould Emouh A, Ould Weddady M, Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary A, et al. Increasing prevalence of *Plasmodium vivax* among febrile patients in Nouakchott, Mauritania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:537–40.

28. El Moustapha I, Deida J, Dadina M, El Ghassem A, Begnoug M, Hamdïnou M, et al. Changing epidemiology of *Plasmodium vivax* malaria in
Nouakchott, Mauritania: a six-year (2015–2020) prospective study. Malar J. 2023;22:18.

29. Rueda LM. Pictorial keys for the identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: culicidae) associated with dengue virus transmission. Zootaxa. vol 589, Magnolia Press, Auckland, New Zealand; 2004. p. 1–60. http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Accessed 01 June 2023.

30. Chadee DD. Resting behaviour of *Aedes aegypti* in Trinidad: with evidence for the re-introduction of indoor residual spraying (IRS) for dengue control. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:255.

31. Seang-arwut C, Hanboonsong Y, Muenworn V, Rochlöv J, Haque U, Ekalaksananan T, et al. Indoor resting behavior of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16:127.

32. Labbo R, Doumma A, Mahamadou I, Arzika I, Soumana A, Kadri S, et al. Distribution and relative densities of *Aedes aegypti* in Niger. Med Sante Trop. 2019;29:47–54.

33. Captain-Esoah M, Kweku Baidoo P, Frempong KK, Adabie-Gomez D, Chabi J, Obuobi D, et al. Biting behavior and molecular identification of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: culicidae) subspecies in some selected recent yellow fever outbreak communities in Northern Ghana. J Med Entomol. 2020;57:1239–45.

34. Diallo D, Diallo M. Resting behavior of *Aedes aegypti* in southeastern Senegal. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:356.

35. Fernando SD, Hapugoda M, Perera R, Saavedra-Rodriguez K, Black WC 4th, De Silva NK. First report of V1016G and S989P knockdown resistant (kdr) mutations in pyrethroid-resistant Sri Lankan *Aedes aegypti* mosquitoes. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:526.

36. Naw H, Vô TC, Lê HG, Kang JM, Mya YY, Myint MK, et al. Knockdown resistance mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) in Myanmar. Insects. 2022;15:e0009393.

37. Sene NM, Mavridis K, Ndiaye EH, Diagne C, Gaye A, Ngom EHM, et al. Insecticide resistance status and mechanisms in *Aedes aegypti* populations from Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009393.

38. Campos M, Ward D, Morales RF, Gomes AR, Silva K, Sepúlveda N, et al. Surveillance of *Aedes aegypti* populations in the city of Praia, Cape Verde: Zika virus infection, insecticide resistance and genetic diversity. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:481.

39. Sombié A, Saiki E, Yaméogo F, Sakurai T, Shirozu T, Fukumoto S, et al. High frequencies of F1534C and V1016I *kdr* mutations and association with pyrethroid resistance in *Aedes aegypti* from Somgandé (Ouagadougou). Burkina Faso Trop Med Health. 2019;47:2.

40. Ablorde A, Ayettey J, Kroidl I, Wieser A, Kudom AA. Co-occurrence of multiple *kdr* mutations (F1534C, V1016I, V410L) in *Aedes aegypti* from coastal areas in Ghana and assessment of the role of mosquito coil in causing pyrethroid resistance. Acta Trop. 2023;243:106937.

41. van den Berg H, da Silva Bezerra HS, Al-Eryani S, Chanda E, Nagpal BN, Knox TB, et al. Recent trends in global insecticide use for disease vector control and potential implications for resistance management. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23867.

42. Kawada H, Higa Y, Futami K, Muranami Y, Kawashima E, Osei JH, et al. Discovery of point mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel from African *Aedes aegypti* populations: potential phylogenetic reasons for gene introgression. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004780.

43. Yougang AP, Kamgang B, Bahun TAW, Tedjou AN, Nguiffo-Nguete D, Njiokou F, et al. First detection of F1534C knockdown resistance mutation in *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) from Cameroon. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9:152.

44. Uemura N, Furutani S, Tomita T, Itokawa K, Komagata O, Kasai S. Concomitant knockdown resistance allele, L982W + F1534C, in *Aedes aegypti* has the potential to impose fitness costs without selection pressure. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2023;193:105422.

45. Brito LP, Carrara L, De Freitas RM, Lima JBP, Martins AJ. Levels of resistance to pyrethroid among distinct kdr alleles in *Aedes aegypti* laboratory lines and frequency of kdr alleles in 27 natural populations from Rio de Janeiro. Brazil Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2410819.

46. Zuharah WF, Sufian M. The discovery of a novel knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation A1007G on *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84669-w. PMID: 33664425; PMCID: PMC7970850.

47. Kushwah RB, Dykes CL, Kapoor N, Adak T, Singh OP. Pyrethroid-resistance and presence of two knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations, F1534C and a novel mutation T1520I, in Indian *Aedes aegypti*. PLoS Negl Trop Dis.

2015;9(1):e3332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003332. PMID: 25569164; PMCID: PMC4287524

48. Kushwah RBS, Kaur T, Dykes CL, Ravi Kumar H, Kapoor N, Singh OP. A new knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation, F1534L, in the voltage-gated sodium channel of *Aedes aegypti*, co-occurring with F1534C, S989P and V1016G. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04201-3. PMID: 32600469; PMCID: PMC7325290.

49. Philbert A, Ijumba J. Preferred breeding habitats of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: culicidae) mosquito and its public health implications in Dar es salaam. Tanzania J Environ Res Manag. 2013;4:344–51.

50. Ngugi HN, Mutuku FM, Ndenga BA, Musunzaji PS, Mbakaya JO, Aswani P. et al. Characterization and productivity profiles of *Aedes aegypti* (L.) breeding habitats across rural and urban landscapes in western and coastal Kenya. Parasit Vectors 2017; 10:331.

51. Haddi K, Tomé H, Du Y, Valbon WR, Nomura Y, Martins GF, et al. Detection of a new pyrethroid resistance mutation (V410L) in the sodium channel of *Aedes aegypti*: a potential challenge for mosquito control. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46549.

## Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ready to submit your research? Choose BMC and benefit from:

* fast, convenient online submission

* thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field

* rapid publication on acceptance

* support for research data, including large and complex data types

* gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations

* maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year

At BMC, research is always in progress.

Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>