# NSs: the multifaceted bunyavirus virulence factor

Maëva Duboeuf, Anne-Flore Legrand, Pierre-Yves Lozach, Carine Maisse

► To cite this version:

Maëva Duboeuf, Anne-Flore Legrand, Pierre-Yves Lozach, Carine Maisse. NSs: the multifaceted bunyavirus virulence factor. npj Viruses, 2025, 3 (1), pp.65. 10.1038/s44298-025-00146-5. hal-05310561

HAL Id: hal-05310561

https://hal.science/hal-05310561v1

Submitted on 13 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44298-025-00146-5

# NSs: the multifaceted bunyavirus virulence factor

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

Maëva Duboeuf, Anne-Flore Legrand, Pierre-Yves Lozach & Carine Maisse

Bunyaviricetes represents a diverse class of RNA viruses, including hundreds of species distributed worldwide that threaten human and animal health. This Perspective briefly overviews bunyaviruses infecting humans and other mammals, focusing on their key virulence factor, the nonstructural protein NSs. By subverting host cell processes, NSs promotes immune evasion and viral replication. Here, we discuss its role in bunyavirus cytotoxicity and virulence and highlight its implications for pathogenesis.

Until 2017, the *Bunyaviridae* family comprised five genera of arthropod- and rodent-borne viruses with trisegmented, negative-sense RNA genomes related to Bunyamwera virus (BUNV)¹. In 2017, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses promoted the family into the order *Bunyavirales* and later into the class *Bunyaviricetes*, reflecting the growing diversity of newly identified species¹. As of 2025, *Bunyaviricetes* includes two orders, more than a dozen viral families, and more than 600 species. Most available information on bunyaviruses comes from studies using a limited number of strains and species. In this *Perspective*, we use the term “bunyaviruses” in a broad sense to refer to all members of the class *Bunyaviricetes*. However, there is a wide variety of bunyavirus species, vectors, hosts, diseases, and geographical distributions. Bunyaviruses are unique in the sense that they infect a broad range of hosts, including humans and other vertebrates, invertebrates, fungi, plants, and protists. Except for arenaviruses and hantaviruses, which are transmitted via contaminated aerosols, most bunyaviruses are arthropod-borne and belong to the supergroup of arboviruses.

The bunyavirus mode of transmission and their ability to cause serious disease in humans and domestic animals, combined with global warming and human activity, highlight the potential of these viruses as agents of emerging disease and their relevance to public and veterinary health. Examples include the *Bandavirus dabieense*, commonly referred to as Dabie virus (DABV) and previously known as severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus or SFTSV, Toscana virus (TOSV), and La Crosse virus (LACV), which cause thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic fever, with case fatality rates ranging from 10 to 30%, in Asia; meningoencephalitis in Europe; and pediatric encephalitis in North America, respectively²⁻⁴. Other examples include Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) in Africa, Schmallenberg virus (SBV), which emerged in 2011 in Central Europe, and Heartland virus (HRTV) in North America. RVFV infection often results in acute hepatitis, encephalitis, and birth defects in several mammalian hosts, including cattle⁵, SBV is teratogenic in ruminants⁶, and HRTV clusters closely with DABV and shares key virological and biological features⁷. In the absence of vaccines or specific antiviral treatments approved for human use, the World Health Organization has classified two bunyaviruses, RVFV and Crimean-Congo

hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), as priority pathogens for which there is an urgent need to accelerate research and development efforts⁸.

We recommend that comprehensive information on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and socioeconomic impact of bunyaviruses be obtained from recent studies⁹⁻¹¹. Here, we provide an overview of the bunyavirus cellular life cycle. We next address the latest insights into how NSs proteins counteract host defenses and responses in humans and other mammals, particularly by modulating innate immunity and cell death to increase viral replication. Finally, we examine the implications for bunyavirus-induced cytotoxicity, virulence, and pathogenesis.

## The bunyavirus cellular life cycle

The diversity within *Bunyaviricetes* is reflected at both cellular and molecular levels. The viral particles are enveloped, roughly spherical, and heterogeneous in size, ranging from 80 to 160 nm in diameter (Fig. 1a). Most bunyaviruses discussed in this *Perspective* have a multisegmented, single-stranded RNA genome, typically composed of three segments of predominantly negative polarity¹. However, members of *Bunyaviricetes* can display considerable genomic variability, including mono- to poly-segmented RNA genomes. The name of a viral genomic RNA segment refers to its size in nucleic acids: “L” for the largest segment, “M” the medium sized segment, and “S” for the smallest segment. Together, they encode four structural proteins, which constitute the viral particles, namely, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), a nucleoprotein, and two trans-membrane glycoproteins. Arenaviruses differ from other bunyaviruses in that they encode a matrix protein (Z), which decorates the inner part of the viral envelope (Fig. 1a). Other bunyaviruses do not have rigid internal structures, and their nucleoproteins therefore play an important role in protecting their genetic information.

Each of the viral RNA segments has conserved complementary sequences at the 5' and 3' ends that anneal into short double-stranded (ds) structures¹². The viral RdRp L binds to these terminal sequences, rather than to the annealed structure itself. This assembly results in the pseudocirculation of each segment, which typically has a panhandle or hairpin appearance within the viral particles¹². Within a viral particle, the
**Fig. 1** | **Structural organization of bunyaviruses, their S RNA genomic segment, and their NSs protein.** a Bunyaviral particles. Schematic representations of typical bunyavirus particles. The viral RNA genome is segmented, and each segment is named according to its relative size: S (small), M (medium), and L (large). b Bunyavirus S segment. c Percentage identity matrix based on multiple sequence alignment of representative NSs protein amino acid sequences across bunyaviruses. Alignment was performed using MAFFT v7.490. The identity values are color-coded: <25% (light gray), 25–50% (medium gray), and >50% (dark gray). Color code for virus families: *Hantaviridae* (yellow), *Nairoviridae* (green), *Peribunyaviridae* (blue), and *Phenuiviridae* (red). ANDV Andes virus, BUNV Bunyamwera virus, CCHFV Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, DABV Dabie virus, DUGV Dugbe virus, GERV Germiston virus, Gc glycoprotein c, Gn glycoprotein n, GP glycoprotein, GTV Guertu virus, HRTV Heartland virus, HTNV Hantaan virus, LACV La Crosse virus, LASV Lassa virus, LCMV lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, N nucleoprotein, NP nucleoprotein, PTV Punta Toro virus, RdRp RNA-dependent RNA polymerase L, RVFV Rift Valley fever virus, SBV Schmallenberg virus, SFSV Sandfly fever Sicilian virus, TOSV Toscana virus, UUKV Uukuniemi virus, Z protein Z. Created in part with BioRender.com.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 2** | **Interaction between the nonstructural protein NSs and the host cellular machinery.** Bunyaviruses attach to host cell surfaces via various receptors and are internalized before escaping from late endosomes into the cytosol (1). After genome release, the RNA segments are either transcribed into mRNAs for protein synthesis (2) or replicated for packaging into new virions (3). Throughout the replication cycle, NSs proteins interfere with multiple host antiviral pathways (highlighted in red). ANDV Andes virus, BUNV Bunyamwera virus, CCHFV Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, cRNA complementary RNA, DABV Dabie virus, HRTV Heartland virus, IFN interferon, IKK IκB kinase, IRF IFN regulatory factor, LACV

La Crosse virus, LEs late endosomes, MAVS mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein, mtDNA mitochondrial DNA, mTOR mammalian target of rapamycin, NFκB nuclear factor kappa B, NLRP3 NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3, PKR protein kinase R, RIG-I retinoic acid-inducible gene I, ROS reactive oxygen species, RVFV Rift Valley fever virus, SAFA scaffold attachment factor A, SBV Schmallenberg virus, SFSV Sandfly fever Sicilian virus, TBK1 TANK-binding kinase 1, TOSV Toscana virus, TRAF TNF receptor-associated factor, TRIF TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-β, vRNA viral genomic RNA. Created in part with BioRender.com.

genome prevents the translation of viral RNA segments by the host cell machinery. Instead, viral messenger RNAs (mRNAs) are transcribed, exhibiting a 5'-cap and a short stretch of a heterogeneous sequence, both of which are derived from the host cell, but no poly(A) tail¹⁷. The nucleoprotein interacts with viral genomic RNAs as they are being synthesized and favors their incorporation into nascent viral particles. Another exceptional trait of arenaviruses is that they leave cells via the plasma membrane¹⁸. In contrast, other bunyaviruses assemble and bud in the Golgi network, from which the viral particles acquire their lipidic bilayer envelopes before exiting host cells¹⁵,¹⁹. The viral progeny ensures the transfer of the viral genomes from infected cells to uninfected cells, although other mechanisms, notably cell-to-cell

transfer, have been proposed for bunyaviruses²⁰,²¹. Excellent reviews have addressed the most recent knowledge regarding the molecular mechanisms of bunyavirus replication¹²,¹⁷,²².

## Bunyavirus nonstructural proteins

Except for arenaviruses, bunyaviruses encode up to two nonstructural (NS) proteins, NSm and NSs. The number of NS proteins varies across viral families, genera, and even strains, and their expression has yet to be confirmed in many cases. However, most bunyaviruses encode an NSs protein (Fig. 1b), although the corresponding sequences are highly divergent across species, as illustrated in Fig. 1c. The NS proteins are typically small
(10–40 kDa) and expressed in infected cells, but not incorporated into viral particles²³⁻²⁵. In the case of arenaviruses, the nucleoprotein N and the matrix protein Z, two structural proteins, appear to affect the functions of the NS proteins of other bunyaviruses. The specific case of arenaviruses will only be partially addressed, as we will be concentrating on NS proteins here. We recommend the excellent review by Stott and colleagues for more details regarding arenaviruses and the N and Z proteins¹⁸.

The bunvirus NS proteins are generally not required for viral replication, but they play an essential role in virus amplification and propagation. They efficiently modulate host cell functions and defenses. NSm has been shown to facilitate the spread of RVFV by inhibiting the apoptosis triggered by infection²⁶. In insect cells, an alternative form of NSm is thought to play a structural role in virions²⁷ and appears to be a key determinant in bunvirus transmission between mosquitoes and vertebrates²⁸. However, the NSm protein remains largely uncharacterized beyond these findings. The NSs protein is somewhat better studied, although most of the available data pertain to those of RVFV, and to a lesser extent, DABV.

## The virulence factor NSs, a versatile viral protein

The accumulation of evidence has indicated that the bunvirus NSs protein is a major virulence factor, with a significant contribution to disease outcomes in mammalian hosts. A notable example is RVFV. A natural RVFV strain lacking most of the NSs sequence, clone 13, propagates in BALB/c mice; however, the animals are able to control viral replication, clear the infection, and survive²⁹. In contrast, infection with the wildtype (WT) RVFV strain induces nonlethal acute hepatitis, followed by fatal encephalitis, mirroring what is seen in severe human cases²⁹. Similar observations have been reported regarding BUNV, DABV, HRTV, SBV, and Punta Toro (PTV)³⁰⁻³⁶. Genetically engineered deletion of the NSs gene in the S segment attenuates each virus. Collectively, these studies establish NSs as the principal virulence factor of mammalian bunyaviruses.

Several observations have supported the hypothesis that NSs functions are correlated with bunvirus dissemination and disease severity. Bunyavirus NSs proteins exhibit diverse biological activities and generally act as multifunctional regulators of molecular and cellular processes. NSs has been shown to play a crucial role in the host antiviral defense evasion ability of several bunyaviruses. Therefore, NSs likely facilitates virus amplification and propagation throughout the host, although NSs has not been reported to be directly involved in viral replication and progeny production³⁷,³⁸. The following sections explore the various biological functions of NSs that contribute to molecular and cellular disorders, with a potential link to promote viral replication, cause cytotoxicity, and increase disease severity.

## NSs, the host cellular machinery, and viral replication

Several observations have indicated that NSs proteins encoded by species from different viral families cause a general shutdown of host gene expression following infection. First, RVFV NSs interacts with the p44 and p62 subunits of the TFIIH transcription complex, thereby inhibiting overall host transcription³⁹. Similarly, the BUNV, LACV, and SBV NSs proteins suppress host gene expression by targeting RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II), which is essential for cellular mRNA synthesis¹⁰⁻¹⁴. BUNV NSs was first shown to prevent phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of the RNA Pol II and impair the transition of initiation-to-elongation RNA synthesis⁴³. This process was later proposed to involve the interaction of NSs with MED8¹⁰, a subunit of the RNA Pol II preinitiation complex. In contrast, LACV and SBV NSs promote the proteasomal degradation of the RPB1 subunit of RNA Pol II⁴¹,⁴⁴; this process has been shown to involve the E3 ubiquitin ligase Elongin C and its cofactors Elongin A and B in the case of LACV⁴¹,⁴². In addition, RVFV NSs interacts with the nuclear pore and disrupt nuclear transport, resulting in the accumulation of host mRNAs in the nucleus¹⁵⁻¹⁷. In contrast, the NSs protein of the bunvirus Uukuniemi virus (UUKV) does not appear to affect cellular transcription or translation⁴⁸,⁴⁹. Unlike the NSs proteins of RVFV, LACV, SBV, and BUNV, which translocate to the nucleus⁴¹,⁵⁰⁻⁵², UUKV NSs remains strictly cytoplasmic, suggesting a correlation between NSs nuclear translocation and the

inhibition of general transcription. Overall, NSs undoubtedly makes it easier for bunyaviruses to subvert host cellular machinery for their own purposes and replicate their genetic materials.

## Antiviral responses: the interplay between NSs and cellular sensors

The host immune system employs two main lines of defense against invading pathogens: innate and adaptive immunity. While adaptive immunity against bunyaviruses remains poorly documented, the production of neutralizing antibodies, which primarily target viral glycoproteins on the surfaces of viral particles, appears to be critical for controlling infection across mammalian hosts²⁵. For the vast majority of bunyaviruses, dermal dendritic cells and macrophages are among the first cells to encounter incoming viral particles, and each cell type is highly susceptible to infection³³. Additionally, the rapid proliferation of neutrophils, B-cells, and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cells, which are key players in antiviral immunity, seems to be correlated with a reduced severity of disease in both humans and primates exposed to RVFV²⁵.

Innate immunity is also crucial for limiting bunvirus pathogenesis, and the NSs proteins of several bunyaviruses are well-known antagonists of this response³⁸,⁵⁴⁻⁵⁶. Briefly, innate immune activation relies on numerous cellular sensors, collectively known as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), that detect various molecular components of pathogens, such as viral nucleic acids and proteins. PRR activation typically leads to interferon (IFN) induction and the release of IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines. For example, PRRs such as RIG-I-like receptors, certain Toll-like receptors, and protein kinase R (PKR) specialize in the sensing of viral RNA. This triggers a kinase signaling cascade that leads to the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of NFκB (p65) and IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), ultimately resulting in the production of type I IFN (IFN-I). For a comprehensive review of these key players in innate immune activation, we refer readers to the recent review by Dalskov et al.⁵⁷.

There is a growing body of evidence that bunyaviruses have evolved strategies to target PRRs and suppress antiviral defenses via NSs³⁸,⁵⁵,⁵⁸. Among these strategies, the NSs protein of RVFV is the most extensively studied and is known to be a potent silencer of PKR⁵⁹,⁶⁰. A hallmark of RVFV infection is the formation of striking nuclear filaments, which were first reported by Swanepoel and colleagues in 1977⁵⁰. These structures have recently been identified as bundles of thin (10-nm wide) NSs fibrils resembling amyloid-like aggregates⁶¹. Recent structure-function studies have indicated that these fibrilar aggregates play a key role in PKR silencing and other biological functions of NSs⁶⁰,⁶¹. Mechanistically, RVFV NSs recruits an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex comprising Skp1, Cul1, FBXW11, and β-TRCP1 to promote PKR degradation via the proteasome, thereby preventing the amplification of IFN-I responses⁶²⁻⁶⁵. This also counteracts the PKR-mediated translation shutdown, allowing continued protein synthesis in infected cells. Similarly, the NSs protein of TOSV has been proposed to interact with PKR and promote its proteasomal degradation, although the specific molecules involved remain to be identified⁶⁶ (Fig. 2). In contrast, studies on Sandfly fever Sicilian virus, a bunvirus closely related to TOSV, have shown that NSs does not induce PKR degradation⁶⁷ but instead sustains viral protein synthesis by binding to the translation initiation factor eIF2B and preventing its inhibition by PKR-phosphorylated eIF2α⁶⁸, thereby bypassing the effects of PKR activation (Fig. 2).

Other bunyaviruses adopt distinct strategies to disrupt PRR signaling. For example, DABV NSs forms cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (IBs), large structures in which NSs accumulates and that sequester PRRs and associated host factors such as TRIM25, an E3 ubiquitin ligase essential for RIG-I ubiquitination and activation. By trapping TRIM25, DABV NSs prevents the sensor activity of RIG-I and thereby blocks IFN production at an early stage of PRR signaling. Ectopic expression of TOSV NSs has been shown to suppress IFN responses by promoting RIG-I degradation, potentially through an intrinsic E3 ubiquitin ligase activity⁶⁹ (Fig. 2). In addition, the NSs protein of Andes virus, a highly pathogenic hantavirus, antagonizes the innate immune response by interfering with IFN signaling downstream of
RIG-I and upstream of TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), likely through disrupting MAVS signaling²⁰. The precise mechanism, however, remains to be fully elucidated.

Similarly, arenaviruses block and evade the IFN response through their Z proteins. Specifically, Z prevents the interaction of RIG-I and the other dsRNA sensor, melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), with mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS), which is essential for activating IRF3, IRF7, and p65 (Fig. 2). Furthermore, arenaviruses utilize their nucleoproteins to degrade dsRNA replication intermediates, thereby circumventing PRR activation¹⁸. Through these mechanisms, arenaviruses manage to finely regulate viral genomic RNA replication to sustain progeny production while evading the innate immune system.

## Autophagy and antiviral responses

Recent studies have implicated autophagy in the host antiviral response to both DABV and RVFV (Fig. 2). DABV NSs colocalizes with the autophagy-related proteins LC3B and p62⁷¹, and promote autophagy induction by inactivating mTOR, a repressor of autophagy⁷². Consistently, NSs has been shown to activate Beclin1, a key positive regulator of autophagy, leading to enhanced autophagic activity and increased DABV replication⁷²,⁷³. NSs-induced autophagy has also been associated with the degradation of TBK1 and the RNA sensor scaffold attachment factor A (SAFA)⁷⁴,⁷⁵. While SAFA degradation requires NSs-mediated interactions with LC3⁷⁵, it remains unclear whether Beclin1 activation results from a direct interaction with NSs⁷³,⁷⁴, and whether sequestration within NSs-induced IBs or canonical autophagic degradation is involved.

Collectively, these findings support a model in which NSs-triggered autophagy facilitates immune evasion and favors DABV replication. In contrast, RVFV NSs contains multiple LC3-interacting regions and have been proposed to suppress autophagy in infected cells⁷⁶. However, whether autophagy plays a pro- or antiviral role during RVFV infection remains debatable⁷⁷,⁷⁸. Together, these observations highlight the complex and virus-specific interplay between bunyavirus NSs proteins and the autophagy machinery, and whether it promotes viral replication or contributes to antiviral defense remains to be investigated for most bunyaviruses.

## NSs, a potent antagonist of IFN induction and response

The NSs proteins of several hantaviruses and other pathogenic bunyaviruses interfere with the IFN pathway downstream of PRR signaling inhibition²⁴,³ ⁸,⁵⁵,⁵⁸,⁷⁹⁻⁸³. In RVFV-infected cells, nuclear NSs filaments retain the transcription factors Sin3A-associated protein (SAP30) and YY1. SAP30 is a transcriptional repressor that plays a central role in regulating gene expression and maintaining chromatin stability through histone deacetylation. Together with YY1, SAP30 forms a molecular complex that prevents the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP), an acetyl transferase, from accessing the IFN-β promoter, thereby repressing IFN-β gene expression⁸⁴. Additionally, this interaction leads to chromosome segregation defects during cell division⁸⁴. In parallel, SBV NSs has also been reported to localize to the nucleolus, where it induces nucleolar disorganization⁵². A potential link has been proposed between this disruption and the ability of NSs to suppress host transcription, thereby precluding cellular antiviral responses²².

Similarly, the NSs proteins of DABV and HRTV inhibit IFN-β responses at steps subsequent to PRR activation. First, the cytosolic IBs formed by DABV NSs sequester the downstream signaling proteins IkB kinase ε (IKKε) and TBK1, which are responsible for phosphorylating IRF3 and IRF7³⁸,⁸⁵,⁸⁶. As a result, the transcription factors IRF3 and IRF7 remain unphosphorylated, which prevents their translocation into the nucleus (Fig. 2). HRTV NSs similarly inhibits IRF3 activation by preventing its association with TBK1⁸⁷. In addition, DABV NSs has been shown to also sequester IRF7⁸⁸. Altogether, these interactions lead to a general suppression of IFN gene expression and IFN production.

Both DABV and HRTV NSs disrupt IFN signaling at a later stage by interfering with receptor-mediated responses⁸⁹⁻⁹². Similar to its effect on MAVS, TBK1, and IKKε, DABV NSs captures the transcription factors

STAT1 and STAT2 in IBs. Consequently, these factors are no longer phosphorylated upon IFN receptor activation, effectively abolishing the IFN response. In contrast, HRTV NSs selectively impairs the nuclear translocation of STAT2 without affecting STAT1⁹¹,⁹², suggesting a more targeted mechanism. However, the reduced phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT2 in HRTV-infected cells, along with the overall suppression of IFN signaling, suggests that additional viral factors beyond NSs are likely involved.

Regarding arenaviruses, the nucleoprotein NP and the matrix protein Z appear to compensate for the absence of NSs by fulfilling similar functions. For example, NP has been shown to suppress the IFN response by inhibiting key components of the RIG-I/MDA5 signaling pathway, including IKKε and IRF3⁹³⁻⁹⁵.

## Inflammatory responses, cell death, and fatal host defenses

In addition to limiting viral replication in infected cells, the IFN response alerts neighboring, uninfected cells to the presence of a potentially harmful pathogen. However, cells that emit such a danger signal in response to infection often undergo regulated cell death, either via an inflammatory mode, such as pyroptosis, or via a noninflammatory mode, primarily apoptosis. Pyroptosis is initiated in the cytosol by activation of the inflammasome in response to cellular stress or danger signals. This multiprotein platform ultimately activates caspase-1, a key enzyme that promotes pore formation in the plasma membrane and the release of proinflammatory cytokines, thereby recruiting immune cells to the site of infection⁹⁶. In contrast, apoptosis, a “silent” form of cell death, can be mediated either by p65-induced and IRF3-induced activation of death receptors at the plasma membrane or by mitochondrial damage.

In this context, the inflammatory response and regulated cell death represent ultimate host defense strategies, limiting viral spread by restricting the exposure of adjacent cells to the invading pathogen. The contribution of cellular stress responses, particularly cell death, to host antiviral defense mechanisms, both at the cellular scale and at the whole-organism level, is often underestimated. Importantly, cell death acts as a double-edged sword during viral infection. While it facilitates pathogen clearance and promotes the recruitment of immune cells to initiate adaptive immunity, excessive or highly immunogenic cell death can exacerbate pathogenicity at the systemic level. Like many other viruses, bunyaviruses commonly induce cytotoxicity and inflammation. Notably, the NSs protein has been implicated in these processes, suggesting that NSs may be a key determinant of the physiological outcomes associated with bunyavirus infection.

Specifically, RVFV NSs expression impedes the actin cytoskeleton by inhibiting Abl2, a critical regulator of the actin network, leading to pronounced morphological alterations⁹⁷. Furthermore, RVFV NSs and DABV NSs induce cell cycle arrest through distinct mechanisms (Fig. 2). In RVFV-infected cells, NSs promotes the phosphorylation of p53⁹⁸,⁹⁹, a posttranslational modification that plays a key role in halting cell cycle progression. Conversely, DABV NSs sequesters CDK1 within IBs and prevents the formation of the cyclin B1-CDK1 complex, which is also essential for cell cycle progression¹⁰⁰. In both cases, the resulting cell cycle arrest enhances viral replication.

Severe DABV infection is marked by a cytokine storm¹⁰¹,¹⁰² driven by excessive activation of p65¹⁰³ and likely also by NLRP3¹⁰⁴⁻¹⁰⁶, a pivotal innate immune sensor within the inflammasome⁹⁶. The NSs protein undoubtedly contributes to these exacerbated inflammatory processes. It has been shown to increase p65 activation¹⁰⁵ and to directly interact with NLRP3, promoting caspase-1 activation and, in turn, pyroptosis and inflammation¹⁰⁵. Conversely, it is noteworthy that DABV NSs appears to induce the production of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 by targeting the TPL2 signaling pathway¹⁰⁷ and, more specifically in macrophages, by promoting the over-expression of miR-146b¹⁰⁸, thereby dampening host defenses. This dual ability of NSs to both activate NLRP3 and promote IL-10 raises intriguing questions about how DABV fine-tunes host immune responses to support viral persistence and pathogenesis.
Overexpression of the PTV NSs protein has been shown to induce caspase activation, leading to apoptosis<sup>109</sup>. CCHFV NSs has been found to disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential via its C-terminal region (Fig. 2), leading to caspase activation and apoptosis<sup>110</sup>, although its precise role in regulating apoptosis during infection remains to be fully defined. In RVFV-infected cells, NSs colocalization with mitochondria correlated with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species, which also led to the activation of the p65 and p53 signaling pathways (Fig. 2)<sup>111</sup>. This finding is consistent with a potential contribution to mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of integrity, although a direct causal effect of NSs has not yet been established. Furthermore, RVFV NSs induces mitochondrial damage through the transcriptional downregulation of the antiapoptotic protein MCL1<sup>112</sup>. This results in the release of mitochondrial DNA, which can further activate the inflammasome via NLRP3<sup>112</sup>, as has also been observed regarding DABV<sup>106</sup>.

Conversely, alternative strategies involving the use of NSs proteins to modulate the balance between cell survival and death have been developed by some bunyaviruses. For example, activated caspase-3 accumulates within nuclear NSs filaments in RVFV-infected cells, preventing apoptosis<sup>113</sup>. In addition, BUNV NSs appears to counteract the activity of the transcription factor IRF3 and delay apoptosis (Fig. 2)<sup>114</sup>. While IRF3 is a crucial regulator of the innate immune response, it also performs proapoptotic functions, not only through its transcriptional activity but also via posttranslational interactions<sup>115</sup>. These findings suggest that IRF3 is a key link between antiviral immunity and regulated cell death.

Collectively, these reports suggest that while NSs proteins play a common role in targeting innate immune responses, their impact on cell death processes varies significantly among bunyaviruses. In any case, current evidence strongly supports the notion that NSs proteins are key drivers of the cytotoxicity associated with bunyavirus pathogenesis. It remains unclear whether NSs-mediated modulation of cell death is a primary function of the protein or a secondary consequence of its other activities. Nonetheless, while NSs may ultimately trigger cell death, the virus appears to have sufficient time to complete its replication cycle. Bunyaviruses typically complete their replication within 5-6 h, whereas infected cells generally undergo apoptosis no earlier than 24 h post-infection.

## Future perspective

Bunyaviruses exhibit remarkable diversity at both the molecular and cellular levels, with significant variations in genomic organization and structural features across families. This diversity is particularly evident in the encoding strategy, size, and sequence identity of NSs, the least conserved bunyavirus protein, whose sequence identity ranges from 8 to 29% (Fig. 1c)<sup>116</sup>. This raises the legitimate question of whether all these highly divergent proteins should retain the same “NSs” designation, which is currently based primarily on their genomic location within the S segment, rather than on sequence similarity. To date, half a dozen NSs proteins have been analyzed, most of which originate from pathogenic bunyaviruses and share the ability to counteract innate immune defenses. Further studies using a broader range of bunyavirus strains and species are necessary to determine whether, despite their apparent molecular diversity, all NSs proteins serve the same biological function in mammalian hosts, mainly facilitating viral immune evasion.

Accumulating evidence suggests that NSs proteins also disrupt cellular viability. This dual role likely underpins their function as virulence factors. By interfering with immune responses and cell death pathways, NSs may influence disease severity. For example, the NSs protein of UUKV, which is not associated with any mammalian disease, exhibits only weak IFN antagonism<sup>48</sup>, unlike the NSs proteins of the highly pathogenic bunyaviruses RVFV and DABV. Further investigations are essential to delineate the connections between NSs, immunity, cell death, and disease severity. Evidently, NSs has emerged as a valuable tool for exploring hard-to-investigate molecular mechanisms involved in the interplay between innate immunity and cell death pathways, a field that remains largely unexplored.

NSs filaments are a hallmark of RVFV infection, yet similar structures have not been reported for other bunyaviruses. However, this does not

preclude their existence. First, tools for studying the structure and cell biology of all NSs proteins are lacking. In addition, the NSs proteins of SBV and DABV do not form filaments under fluorescence microscopy observation but instead form large amorphous aggregates in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively<sup>52,86</sup>. Such structures have also been reported for RVFV NSs<sup>61</sup>. Electron micrographs clearly show that they consist of an accumulation of very thin, short fibrils<sup>61</sup>. It is therefore tempting to postulate that NSs also assembles into fibrils in cells infected with SBV and DABV, and also with other bunyaviruses. The biological functions and roles of such NSs aggregates in infection, if any, would remain to be elucidated.

Viral protein aggregates have also been reported regarding unrelated viruses. These aggregates often exhibit phase-separating properties, which are well known to facilitate the segregation of viral genetic material and the formation of specialized microenvironments that promote viral replication and the assembly of new viral particles<sup>117</sup>. NSs has not been associated with such functions; however, a growing body of evidence highlights its influence on the dynamics and extent of amplification and spread of several bunyaviruses<sup>118</sup>. It is also tempting to draw a link between the aggregation of certain NSs proteins and the formation of IBs observed during infection with some bunyaviruses.

While IFN antagonism is undoubtedly a contributing factor, NSs also modulates host cell machinery, creating a favorable environment for viral replication and dissemination. Investigating these aspects remains challenging, not because reverse genetics approaches are inherently flawed, but because genetic manipulations of the NSs-coding region can introduce confounding effects. In many cases, introducing point mutations or tags reduces NSs expression, making it difficult to distinguish a true loss of function from simply lower protein levels. In addition, such modifications can alter the organization and structure of the viral genomic RNA, thereby influencing the expression of other viral proteins rather than solely targeting NSs. Although reverse genetics has been highly informative in studying NSs functions, these limitations call for cautious interpretation and the use of complementary approaches.

The S-genomic segment of RVFV is relatively malleable, and strains lacking NSs replicates in peripheral tissues following transmission to mammalian hosts. Unlike the WT virus, these strains do not reach secondary target organs such as the liver and brain, underscoring the critical role of NSs in RVFV dissemination. The NSs protein indirectly shapes viral tropism and represents a promising model for studying the complex biology of zoonotic virus spread. In contrast to most other zoonotic viruses, which often encode multiple NS proteins, many bunyaviruses rely heavily on NSs to support replication and evade host immune responses. Most bunyaviruses of interest also encode an NSm protein, the other NS protein that can influence both vertebrate-to-arthropod transmission and replication in arthropod vectors, as notably observed for BUNV<sup>28</sup> and RVFV<sup>27,119,120</sup>. Nevertheless, the central role of NSs is particularly striking in the life cycle of viruses such as DABV and HRTV, which lack NSm altogether.

The transition from vector to host implies a profound biological shift, particularly when moving from arthropods to mammals, and influences molecular components and cellular processes. Unlike the cytotoxic effects observed in mammalian cells, infections by bunyaviruses and other arboviruses in arthropods are typically asymptomatic and persistent<sup>121,122</sup>. Interestingly, bunyavirus persistence in mosquito cells seems to rely on the downregulation of NSs expression by a specific RNA interference response<sup>123,124</sup>. Overall, the role of NSs in arthropods remains poorly understood, and their potential involvement in the vector-to-host transition is entirely unknown. Expanding research to a wider range of bunyaviruses and incorporating NSm are essential for elucidating NSs functions in arthropod viral persistence, species barrier crossing, and often fatal outcomes of infection in mammals. Unraveling these mechanisms is crucial for addressing why mammalian hosts often succumb to infection while arthropods survive.

## Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Received: 3 June 2025; Accepted: 16 August 2025;

Published online: 03 September 2025

References

1. Kuhn, J. H. et al. Promotion of order Bunyavirales to class Bunyaviricetes to accommodate a rapidly increasing number of related Polyploviricotine viruses. *J. Virol.* **98**, e0106924 (2024).

2. Yu, X.-J. et al. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunvavirus in China. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **364**, 1523–1532 (2011).

3. Moriconi, M. et al. Phlebotomine sand fly-borne pathogens in the Mediterranean Basin: human leishmaniasis and phlebovirus infections. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **11**, e0005660 (2017).

4. Edridge, A. W. D. & van der Hoek, L. Emerging orthobunyaviruses associated with CNS disease. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **14**, e0008856 (2020).

5. Wright, D., Kortekaas, J., Bowden, T. A. & Warimwe, G. M. Rift Valley fever: biology and epidemiology. *J. Gen. Virol.* **100**, 1187–1199 (2019).

6. Wernike, K. & Beer, M. Schmallenberg virus: to vaccinate, or not to vaccinate? *Vaccines* **8**, 287 (2020).

7. Brault, A. C., Savage, H. M., Duggal, N. K., Eisen, R. J. & Staples, J. E. Heartland virus epidemiology, vector association, and disease potential. *Viruses* **10**, 498 (2018).

8. WHO R&D Blueprint for Epidemics. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/blue-print/rd-blueprint_prioritization-2022_concept-note_v.1.pdf?sfvrsn=260e4e8f_3.

9. Ye, W. & Yan, F. Editorial: bunyaviruses-threatening to health and economy. *Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.* **14**, 1369530 (2024).

10. Chen, T., Ding, Z., Lan, J. & Wong, G. Advances and perspectives in the development of vaccines against highly pathogenic bunyaviruses. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **13**, 1174030 (2023).

11. Peyre, M. et al. A systematic scoping study of the socio-economic impact of rift valley fever: research gaps and needs. *Zoonoses Public Health* **62**, 309–325 (2015).

12. Malet, H., Williams, H. M., Cusack, S. & Rosenthal, M. The mechanism of genome replication and transcription in bunyaviruses. *PLoS Pathog.* **19**, e1011060 (2023).

13. Gao, H. et al. The role of orthobunyavirus glycoprotein Gc in the viral life cycle: from viral entry to egress. *Molecules* **30**, 503 (2025).

14. Koch, J., Xin, Q., Tischler, N. D. & Lozach, P.-Y. Entry of phenuiviruses into mammalian host cells. *Viruses* **13**, 299 (2021).

15. Spiegel, M., Plegge, T. & Pöhlmann, S. The role of phlebovirus glycoproteins in viral entry, assembly and release. *Viruses* **8**, 202 (2016).

16. Windhaber, S., Xin, Q. & Lozach, P.-Y. Orthobunyaviruses: from virus binding to penetration into mammalian host cells. *Viruses* **13**, 872 (2021).

17. Olschewski, S., Cusack, S. & Rosenthal, M. The cap-snatching mechanism of bunyaviruses. *Trends Microbiol.* **28**, 293–303 (2020).

18. Stott, R. J., Strecker, T. & Foster, T. L. Distinct molecular mechanisms of host immune response modulation by arenavirus NP and Z proteins. *Viruses* **12**, 784 (2020).

19. Léger, P. & Lozach, P.-Y. Bunyaviruses: from transmission by arthropods to virus entry into the mammalian host first-target cells. *Future Virol.* **10**, 859–881 (2015).

20. Silvas, J. A., Popov, V. L., Paulucci-Holthauzen, A. & Aguilar, P. V. Extracellular vesicles mediate receptor-independent transmission of novel tick-borne bunyavirus. *J. Virol.* **90**, 873–886 (2015).

21. Kerviel, A., Zhang, M. & Altan-Bonnet, N. A new infectious unit: extracellular vesicles carrying virus populations. *Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.* **37**, 171–197 (2021).

22. Sun, Y., Li, J., Gao, G. F., Tien, P. & Liu, W. Bunyavirales ribonucleoproteins: the viral replication and transcription machinery. *Crit. Rev. Microbiol.* **44**, 522–540 (2018).

23. Peng, K. & Lozach, P.-Y. Rift valley fever virus: a new avenue of research on the biological functions of amyloids? *Future Virol.* **16**, 677–689 (2021).

24. Eifan, S., Schnettler, E., Dietrich, I., Kohl, A. & Blomström, A.-L. Non-structural proteins of arthropod-borne bunyaviruses: roles and functions. *Viruses* **5**, 2447–2468 (2013).

25. Weber, F., Bouloy, M. & Lozach, P.-Y. An introduction to Rift Valley fever virus. *Methods Mol. Biol.* **2824**, 1–14 (2024).

26. Won, S., Ikegami, T., Peters, C. J. & Makino, S. NSm protein of Rift Valley fever virus suppresses virus-induced apoptosis. *J. Virol.* **81**, 13335–13345 (2007).

27. Kreher, F. et al. The Rift Valley fever accessory proteins NSm and P78/NSm-GN are distinct determinants of virus propagation in vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. *Emerg. Microbes Infect.* **3**, e71 (2014).

28. Terhzaz, S. et al. NSm is a critical determinant for bunyavirus transmission between vertebrate and mosquito hosts. *Nat. Commun.* **16**, 1214 (2025).

29. Bouloy, M. et al. Genetic evidence for an interferon-antagonistic function of Rift Valley fever virus nonstructural protein NSs. *J. Virol.* **75**, 1371–1377 (2001).

30. Bridgen, A., Weber, F., Fazakerley, J. K. & Elliott, R. M. Bunyamwera bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs is a nonessential gene product that contributes to viral pathogenesis. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **98**, 664–669 (2001).

31. Bryden, S. R. et al. Exploration of immunological responses underpinning severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus infection reveals IL-6 as a therapeutic target in an immunocompromised mouse model. *PNAS Nexus* **1**, pgac024 (2022).

32. Kraatz, F. et al. Deletion mutants of Schmallenberg virus are avirulent and protect from virus challenge. *J. Virol.* **89**, 1825–1837 (2015).

33. Nishiyama, S. et al. Attenuation of pathogenic Rift Valley fever virus strain through the chimeric S-segment encoding sandfly fever phlebovirus NSs or a dominant-negative PKR. *Virulence* **7**, 871–881 (2016).

34. Perrone, L. A., Narayanan, K., Worthy, M. & Peters, C. J. The S segment of Punta Toro virus (Bunyaviridae, Phlebovirus) is a major determinant of lethality in the Syrian hamster and codes for a type I interferon antagonist. *J. Virol.* **81**, 884–892 (2007).

35. Taniguchi, S. et al. Reverse genetics system for Heartland Bandavirus: NSs protein contributes to Heartland Bandavirus virulence. *J. Virol.* **96**, e0004922 (2022).

36. Varela, M. et al. Schmallenberg virus pathogenesis, tropism and interaction with the innate immune system of the host. *PLoS Pathog.* **9**, e1003133 (2013).

37. Boshra, H. An overview of the infectious cycle of bunyaviruses. *Viruses* **14**, 2139 (2022).

38. Leventhal, S. S., Wilson, D., Feldmann, H. & Hawman, D. W. A look into bunyavirales genomes: functions of non-structural (NS) proteins. *Viruses* **13**, 314 (2021).

39. Le May, N. et al. TFIIH transcription factor, a target for the Rift Valley hemorrhagic fever virus. *Cell* **116**, 541–550 (2004).

40. Léonard, V. H. J., Kohl, A., Hart, T. J. & Elliott, R. M. Interaction of bunyamwera orthobunyavirus NSs protein with mediator protein MED8: a mechanism for inhibiting the interferon response. *J. Virol.* **80**, 9667 (2006).

41. Verbruggen, P. et al. Interferon antagonist NSs of La Crosse virus triggers a DNA damage response-like degradation of transcribing RNA Polymerase II. *J. Biol. Chem.* **286**, 3681–3692 (2011).

42. Schoen, A., Lau, S., Verbruggen, P. & Weber, F. Elongin C contributes to RNA Polymerase II degradation by the interferon antagonist NSs of La Crosse Orthobunyavirus. *J. Virol.* **94**, e02134–19 (2020).
43. Thomas, D. et al. Inhibition of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation by a viral interferon antagonist. *J. Biol. Chem.* **279**, 31471–31477 (2004).

44. Barry, G. et al. NSs protein of Schmallenberg virus counteracts the antiviral response of the cell by inhibiting its transcriptional machinery. *J. Gen. Virol.* **95**, 1640–1646 (2014).

45. Copeland, A. M., Altamura, L. A., Van Deusen, N. M. & Schmaljohn, C. S. Nuclear relocalization of polyadenylate binding protein during Rift Valley fever virus infection involves expression of the NSs gene. *J. Virol.* **87**, 11659–11669 (2013).

46. Copeland, A. M., Van Deusen, N. M. & Schmaljohn, C. S. Rift Valley fever virus NSS gene expression correlates with a defect in nuclear mRNA export. *Virology* **486**, 88–93 (2015).

47. Lau, S. & Weber, F. Nuclear pore protein Nup98 is involved in replication of Rift Valley fever virus and nuclear import of virulence factor NSs. *J. Gen. Virol.* **101**, 712 (2019).

48. Rezelj, V. V., Överby, A. K. & Elliott, R. M. Generation of mutant Uukuniemi Viruses lacking the nonstructural protein NSs by reverse genetics indicates that NSs is a weak interferon antagonist. *J. Virol.* **89**, 4849–4856 (2015).

49. Simons, J. F., Hellman, U. & Pettersson, R. F. Uukuniemi virus S RNA segment: ambisense coding strategy, packaging of complementary strands into virions, and homology to members of the genus Phlebovirus. *J. Virol.* **64**, 247–255 (1990).

50. Swanepoel, R. & Blackburn, N. K. Demonstration of nuclear immunofluorescence in Rift Valley fever infected cells. *J. Gen. Virol.* **34**, 557–561 (1977).

51. Weber, F., Dunn, E. F., Bridgen, A. & Elliott, R. M. The Bunyamwera virus nonstructural protein NSs inhibits viral RNA synthesis in a minireplicon system. *Virology* **281**, 67–74 (2001).

52. Gouzil, J. et al. Nonstructural protein NSs of Schmallenberg Virus is targeted to the nucleolus and induces nucleolar disorganization. *J. Virol.* **91**, e01263-16 (2016).

53. Lozach, P.-Y. et al. DC-SIGN as a receptor for Phleboviruses. *Cell Host Microbe* **10**, 75–88 (2011).

54. Wuerth, J. D. & Weber, F. Phleboviruses and the type I interferon response. *Viruses* **8**, 174 (2016).

55. Ly, H. J. & Ikegami, T. Rift Valley fever virus NSs protein functions and the similarity to other bunyavirus NSs proteins. *ViroJ. J.* **13**, 118 (2016).

56. Blomström, A.-L. et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the host response to Schmallenberg virus in bovine cells and antagonistic effects of the NSs protein. *BMC Genom.* **16**, 324 (2015).

57. Dalskov, L., Gad, H. H. & Hartmann, R. Viral recognition and the antiviral interferon response. *EMBO J.* **42**, e112907 (2023).

58. Khalil, J., Kato, H. & Fujita, T. The role of non-structural protein NSs in the pathogenesis of severe fever with Thrombocytopenia syndrome. *Viruses* **13**, 876 (2021).

59. Ikegami, T. et al. Rift Valley fever virus NSs protein promotes post-transcriptional downregulation of protein kinase PKR and inhibits eIF2α phosphorylation. *PLoS Pathog.* **5**, e1000287 (2009).

60. Habjan, M. et al. NSs protein of Rift Valley fever virus induces the specific degradation of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. *J. Virol.* **83**, 4365–4375 (2009).

61. Léger, P. et al. NSs amyloid formation is associated with the virulence of Rift Valley fever virus in mice. *Nat. Commun.* **11**, 3281 (2020).

62. Kainulainen, M., Lau, S., Samuel, C. E., Hornung, V. & Weber, F. NSs virulence factor of Rift Valley fever virus engages the F-Box proteins FBXW11 and β-TRCP1 to degrade the antiviral protein kinase PKR. *J. Virol.* **90**, 6140–6147 (2016).

63. Mudhasani, R. et al. Protein Kinase R degradation is essential for Rift Valley fever virus infection and is regulated by SKP1-CUL1-F-box (SCF)FBXW11-NSs E3 ligase. *PLoS Pathog.* **12**, e1005437 (2016).

64. Li, H. et al. Rift Valley fever virus coordinates the assembly of a programmable E3 ligase to promote viral replication. *Cell* **187**, 6896–6913.e15 (2024).

65. Kainulainen, M. et al. Virulence factor NSs of rift valley fever virus recruits the F-box protein FBXO3 to degrade subunit p62 of general transcription factor TFIIH. *J. Virol.* **88**, 3464–3473 (2014).

66. Kalveram, B. & Ikegami, T. Toscana Virus NSs protein promotes degradation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. *J. Virol.* **87**, 3710–3718 (2013).

67. Lihoradova, O. A. et al. Characterization of Rift Valley fever virus MP-12 strain encoding NSs of Punta Toro virus or sandfly fever Sicilian virus. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **7**, e2181 (2013).

68. Wuerth, J. D. et al. eIF2B as a target for viral evasion of PKR-mediated translation inhibition. *mBio* **11**, e00976-20 (2020).

69. Gori Savellini, G., Anichini, G., Gandolfo, C., Prathyumanan, S. & Cusi, M. G. Toscana virus non-structural protein NSs acts as E3 ubiquitin ligase promoting RIG-I degradation. *PLoS Pathog.* **15**, e1008186 (2019).

70. Vera-Otarola, J. et al. The Andes Orthohantavirus NSs protein antagonizes the type I interferon response by inhibiting MAVS signaling. *J. Virol.* **94**, e00454-20 (2020).

71. Sun, Y., Liu, M., Lei, X. & Yu, X. SFTS phlebovirus promotes LC3-II accumulation and nonstructural protein of SFTS phlebovirus co-localizes with autophagy proteins. *Sci. Rep.* **8**, 5287 (2018).

72. Feng, K. et al. SFTS bunyavirus NSs protein sequestrates mTOR into inclusion bodies and deregulates mTOR-ULK1 signaling, provoking pro-viral autophagy. *J. Med. Virol.* **95**, e28371 (2023).

73. Liu, S. et al. The SFTSV nonstructural proteins induce autophagy to promote viral replication via interaction with Vimentin. *J. Virol.* **97**, e0030223 (2023).

74. Li, Z.-M. et al. Bunyavirus SFTSV NSs utilizes autophagy to escape the antiviral innate immune response. *Autophagy* **20**, 2133–2145 (2024).

75. Yu, T. et al. SFTSV NSs degrades SAFA via autophagy to suppress SAFA-dependent antiviral response. *PLoS Pathog.* **21**, e1013201 (2025).

76. Petraccione, K. et al. An LIR motif in the Rift Valley fever virus NSs protein is critical for the interaction with LC3 family members and inhibition of autophagy. *PLoS Pathog.* **20**, e1012093 (2024).

77. Moy, R. H. et al. Antiviral autophagy restricts Rift Valley fever virus infection and is conserved from flies to mammals. *Immunity* **40**, 51–65 (2014).

78. Zhu, X. et al. Rift valley fever virus nucleoprotein triggers autophagy to dampen antiviral innate immune responses. *J. Virol.* **97**, e0181422 (2023).

79. Binder, F. et al. Inhibition of interferon I induction by non-structural protein NSs of Puumala virus and other vole-associated orthohantaviruses: phenotypic plasticity of the protein and potential functional domains. *Arch. Virol.* **166**, 2999–3012 (2021).

80. Jääskeläinen, K. M. et al. Tula and Puumala hantavirus NSs ORFs are functional and the products inhibit activation of the interferon-beta promoter. *J. Med. Virol.* **79**, 1527–1536 (2007).

81. Jääskeläinen, K. M., Plyusnina, A., Lundkvist, A., Vaheri, A. & Plyusnin, A. Tula hantavirus isolate with the full-length ORF for nonstructural protein NSs survives for more consequent passages in interferon-competent cells than the isolate having truncated NSs ORF. *ViroJ. J.* **5**, 3 (2008).

82. Gallo, G. et al. Interactions of viral proteins from pathogenic and low or non-pathogenic orthohantaviruses with human type I interferon signaling. *Viruses* **13**, 140 (2021).

83. Weber, F. et al. Bunyamwera bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs counteracts the induction of alpha/beta interferon. *J. Virol.* **76**, 7949–7955 (2002).

84. Le May, N. et al. A SAP30 complex inhibits IFN-β expression in Rift Valley fever virus infected cells. *PLoS Pathog.* **4**, e13 (2008).

85. Lee, J. K. & Shin, O. S. Nonstructural protein of severe fever with Thrombocytopenia syndrome phlebovirus inhibits TBK1 to evade interferon-mediated response. *J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **31**, 226–232 (2021).
86. Ning, Y.-J. et al. Viral suppression of innate immunity via spatial isolation of TBK1/IKKε from mitochondrial antiviral platform. *J. Mol. Cell Biol.* **6**, 324–337 (2014).

87. Ning, Y.-J. et al. Heartland virus NSs protein disrupts host defenses by blocking the TBK1 kinase-IRF3 transcription factor interaction and signaling required for interferon induction. *J. Biol. Chem.* **292**, 16722–16733 (2017).

88. Hong, Y. et al. Suppression of the IFN-α and -β induction through sequestering IRF7 into viral inclusion bodies by nonstructural protein NSs in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus infection. *J. Immunol.* **202**, 841–856 (2019).

89. Chen, X. et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus inhibits exogenous Type I IFN signaling pathway through its NSs in vitro. *PLoS ONE* **12**, e0172744 (2017).

90. Ning, Y.-J. et al. Disruption of type I interferon signaling by the nonstructural protein of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus via the hijacking of STAT2 and STAT1 into inclusion bodies. *J. Virol.* **89**, 4227–4236 (2015).

91. Feng, K., Deng, F., Hu, Z., Wang, H. & Ning, Y.-J. Heartland virus antagonizes type I and III interferon antiviral signaling by inhibiting phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT2 and STAT1. *J. Biol. Chem.* **294**, 9503–9517 (2019).

92. Rezelj, V. V. et al. Differential antagonism of human innate immune responses by tick-borne phlebovirus nonstructural proteins. *mSphere* **2**, e00234-17 (2017).

93. Zhou, S. et al. Induction and inhibition of type I interferon responses by distinct components of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis virus. *J. Virol.* **84**, 9452–9462 (2010).

94. Martínez-Sobrido, L., Giannakas, P., Cubitt, B., García-Sastre, A. & de la Torre, J. C. Differential inhibition of type I interferon induction by arenavirus nucleoproteins. *J. Virol.* **81**, 12696–12703 (2007).

95. Pythoud, C. et al. Arenavirus nucleoprotein targets interferon regulatory factor-activating kinase IKKε. *J. Virol.* **86**, 7728–7738 (2012).

96. Almeida-da-Silva, C. L. C., Savio, L. E. B., Coutinho-Silva, R. & Ojcius, D. M. The role of NOD-like receptors in innate immunity. *Front. Immunol.* **14**, 1122586 (2023).

97. Bamia, A. et al. The NSs protein encoded by the virulent strain of Rift valley fever virus targets the expression of Abl2 and the actin cytoskeleton of the host, affecting cell mobility, cell shape, and cell-cell adhesion. *J. Virol.* **95**, e01768–20 (2020).

98. Baer, A. et al. Induction of DNA damage signaling upon Rift Valley fever virus infection results in cell cycle arrest and increased viral replication. *J. Biol. Chem.* **287**, 7399–7410 (2012).

99. Austin, D. et al. p53 activation following Rift Valley fever virus infection contributes to cell death and viral production. *PLoS ONE* **7**, e36327 (2012).

100. Liu, S. et al. The severe fever with Thrombocytopenia syndrome virus NSs protein interacts with CDK1 to induce G2 cell cycle arrest and positively regulate viral replication. *J. Virol.* **94**, e01575-19 (2020).

101. Sun, Y. et al. Host cytokine storm is associated with disease severity of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. *J. Infect. Dis.* **206**, 1085–1094 (2012).

102. Zhou, C. & Yu, X. Unraveling the underlying interaction mechanism between Dabie bandavirus and innate immune response. *Front. Immunol.* **12**, 676861 (2021).

103. Khalil, J. et al. The nonstructural protein NSs of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus causes a Cytokine storm through the hyperactivation of NF-κB. *Mol. Cell Biol.* **41**, e0054220 (2021).

104. Li, Z. et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and elevation of interleukin-1β secretion in infection by severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus. *Sci. Rep.* **12**, 2573 (2022).

105. Gao, C. et al. Nonstructural protein NSs activates inflammasome and pyroptosis through interaction with NLRP3 in human microglial

cells infected with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bandavirus. *J. Virol.* **96**, e00167-22 (2022).

106. Li, S. et al. SFTSV infection induces BAK/BAX-dependent mitochondrial DNA release to trigger NLRP3 inflammasome activation. *Cell Rep.* **30**, 4370–4385.e7 (2020).

107. Choi, Y. et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome phlebovirus non-structural protein activates TPL2 signalling pathway for viral immunopathogenesis. *Nat. Microbiol.* **4**, 429–437 (2019).

108. Zhang, L. et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus-induced macrophage differentiation is regulated by miR-146. *Front. Immunol.* **10**, 1095 (2019).

109. Li, G., Ren, J., Xu, F. & Ferguson, M. R. Non-structural and nucleocapsid proteins of Punta Toro virus induce apoptosis of hepatocytes through both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. *Microbiol. Immunol.* **54**, 20–30 (2010).

110. Barnwal, B., Karlberg, H., Mirazimi, A. & Tan, Y.-J. The non-structural protein of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus disrupts the mitochondrial membrane potential and induces apoptosis. *J. Biol. Chem.* **291**, 582–592 (2016).

111. Narayanan, A. et al. Reactive oxygen species activate NFκB (p65) and p53 and induce apoptosis in RVFV infected liver cells. *Virology* **449**, 270–286 (2014).

112. Guan, Z. et al. RVFV virulence factor NSs triggers the mitochondrial MCL-1-BAK axis to activate pathogenic NLRP3 pyroptosis. *PLoS Pathog.* **20**, e1012387 (2024).

113. Quellec, J. et al. Rift Valley fever virus modulates apoptosis and immune response during infection of human astrocytes. *Emerg. Microbes Infect.* **12**, 2207672 (2023).

114. Kohl, A. et al. Bunyamwera virus nonstructural protein NSs counteracts interferon regulatory factor 3-mediated induction of early cell death. *J. Virol.* **77**, 7999–8008 (2003).

115. Chattopadhyay, S., Kuzmanovic, T., Zhang, Y., Wetzel, J. L. & Sen, G. C. Ubiquitination of the transcription factor IRF-3 activates RIPA, the apoptotic pathway that protects mice from viral pathogenesis. *Immunity* **44**, 1151–1161 (2016).

116. Xu, F., Chen, H., Travassos da Rosa, A. P. A., Tesh, R. B. & Xiao, S.-Y. Phylogenetic relationships among sandfly fever group viruses (phlebovirus: bunyaviridae) based on the small genome segment. *J. Gen. Virol.* **88**, 2312–2319 (2007).

117. Gondelaud, F., Lozach, P.-Y. & Longhi, S. Viral amyloids: new opportunities for antiviral therapeutic strategies. *Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.* **83**, 102706 (2023).

118. Woelfl, F. et al. Novel Toscana virus reverse genetics system establishes NSs as an antagonist of type I interferon responses. *Viruses* **12**, 400 (2020).

119. Crabtree, M. B. et al. Infection and transmission of Rift Valley fever viruses lacking the NSs and/or NSm genes in mosquitoes: potential role for NSm in mosquito infection. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **6**, e1639 (2012).

120. Kading, R. C. et al. Deletion of the NSm virulence gene of Rift Valley fever virus inhibits virus replication in and dissemination from the midgut of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **8**, e2670 (2014).

121. Hedil, M. & Kormelink, R. Viral RNA silencing suppression: the enigma of Bunyavirus NSs proteins. *Viruses* **8**, 208 (2016).

122. Cappuccio, L. & Maisse, C. Infection of mammals and mosquitoes by alphiviruses: involvement of cell death. *Cells* **9**, 2612 (2020).

123. Blakqori, G. et al. La Crosse bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs serves to suppress the type I interferon system of mammalian hosts. *J. Virol.* **81**, 4991–4999 (2007).

124. Léger, P. et al. Dicer-2- and Piwi-mediated RNA interference in Rift Valley fever virus-infected mosquito cells. *J. Virol.* **87**, 1631–1648 (2013).
Acknowledgements

We thank Benjamin Riocreux-Verney for his help in generating the NSs phylogenetic matrix. We acknowledge funding to P.Y.L. from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, grant number ANR-22-CE15-0034) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, Team FRM, number EQU202403018032). This work was also supported by a fellowship from FRM to M.D. (FRM, FDT202404018225).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: C.M., M.D. and P.Y.L. Supervision: C.M. and P.Y.L.
Writing—original draft: C.M., M.D. and P.Y.L. Writing—review & editing: A.F.,
C.M., M.D. and P.Y.L.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

**Additional information**

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to
Pierre-Yves Lozach or Carine Maisse.

Reprints and permissions information is available at
http://www.nature.com/reprints

**Publisher's note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2025