# A process for participatory co-design of "Agroecological Transition Pathways" at the landscape and food system levels: A process for the articulation of action-research activities and lessons learned from early implementation

Aymen Frija, Véronique Alary, Hatem Cheikh M'hamed, Udo Rudiger, Zied Idoudi, Haithem Bahri, Arbi Lajmi, Mourad Rekik, Hassen Ouerghemmi, Zahara Shiri

## ► To cite this version:

Aymen Frija, Véronique Alary, Hatem Cheikh M'hamed, Udo Rudiger, Zied Idoudi, et al.. A process for participatory co-design of "Agroecological Transition Pathways" at the landscape and food system levels: A process for the articulation of action-research activities and lessons learned from early implementation. Workshop on Governance, Practices, Potentials, and Tension in a Comparative Prespective, University of Kassel, Jul 2023, Kassel, Germany. 2 p. hal-05181791

HAL Id: hal-05181791

https://hal.science/hal-05181791v1

Submitted on 23 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# A process for participatory co-design of agroecological Transition pathways at the landscape and food system levels: a process for the articulation of action-research activities and lessons learned from early implementation

**Auteurs** : Aymen Frija, Veronique Alary, Hatem Cheikh M'hamed, Udo Rudiger, Zied Idoudi, Haithem Bahri, Larbi Ajmi, Mourad Rekik, Hassen Ouerghemmi, Zahra Shiri.

## URI

https://hdl.handle.net/10568/134969

## Résumé

Many questions and debates are being undertaken in the literature about the "context-specific transition pathways of agroecological transformations and their related conceptual, political, institutional, social, and other challenges and opportunities. Pilot projects for Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) are key areas where these questions and related assumptions can be tested, piloted, and reported for better lessons and future conceptualization. In this paper, we present the experience of the One CGIAR Initiative on Agroecology transformation for food, land and water systems, which adopted a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach aimed at enhancing food system resilience, equity, and sustainability. Even though the theory of change (ToC) of this initiative was quite clear and robust, its application on the ground, in seven countries, faced a strong challenge of contextualization, which then guided further adjustments of this ToC to better match local expectations thus leading to locally co-identified (co-designed) transition pathways which are the most relevant to local socioecological systems as well as to stakeholders' preferences and objectives. The paper presents some progress of the initiative implementation from Tunisia case studies thus highlighting a realistic approach (suite of activities), refined with national partners and local communities, for participatory co-design of "Agroecological Transition Pathways" at the living landscape (ALL) and food system levels. The identified (realistic) approach is composed of 10 key steps starting from 1) clearly defining the geographical and conceptual frontiers and intersections between living labs, innovation systems, production system, value chains, socioecological systems, etc. which will then support the clarification and identification of action areas and levels of operation of the ongoing program, 2) Stakeholders' mapping at different levels with identification of synergies and divergences amongst them, 3) Initial engagement activities of a number of key stakeholders in the living landscape with consolidation of a minimum level of trust amongst them, 4) predefine some "actionable" drivers of territorial change / development, 5) Sharing and validating, among key ALL members, an understanding of the context and of the purpose of the "vision-to-action" process which the project is adopting to design the agroecological transition pathway in the landscape, 6) Developing a shared vision for a desirable future amongst different ALL stakeholders and articulating this vision with the AE principles (by the support of experts and planning agents) through co-validation and participation, 7) Identifying the ALL theory of change and the context (system-) specific Agroecology transition pathways in the living landscape; 8) Identify behavioral change needed to progress on the co-designed transition pathway, 9) Identify behavioral drivers that hinder or support this behavior changes; and finally 10) identify the strategic actions to achieve the behavior changes thus leading to the full, or partial, implementation of the agroecological transition pathways. A year of implementation in semi-arid Tunisia (mostly for steps 1 to 7) thought us quite few lessons: while visioning, engagement, and planning for agroecology were relatively manageable and effective at the community levels, stakeholder engagement for the establishment of agroecological transition pathways at the food system level still faces contextual,
conceptual and practical challenges, such as representativeness, conflictual objectives of food system
actors and different interests and self-motivations, or even lack of public engagement for facilitation.
Furthermore, the landscape approach can be relevant for tailoring a mid-range theory for the
transformation of food systems, but the implementation of such a mid-range theory can only be
effective if we operate into a complexity-aware and adaptive program framework. Thirdly,
facilitation and engagement of food system actors can lead to more conducive environments for the
co-design of transition pathways that are well-appropriated by most actors, but the lack of good and
neutral facilitators, as well as seed funds for public facilitation are major constraints. Collective
learning and consolidation of social capital and collective cognitive capacities of food system actors
are key elements leading to "intermediary outcomes" such as sustainable cooperation, partnership,
etc., which can then lead to food system transformation. This communication occurred during the
'sustainable agroecology: governance, practices, potentials, and tensions in a comparative
perspective' workshop in Kassel, Germany, as part of the "Agriculture, Ecology and Societies
program" initiative and the DAAD-funded Global Partnership Network of University of Kassel, as well
as the DAAD-funded AURORA (Sustainable Agriculture and social-ecological systems approaches in
higher education in the MENA region) project, which aims to map sustainable agroecology in diverse
social-ecological, historical and geo-political contexts (University of Kassel – 17-18 July 2023).

Mots-clés

agroecology; research for development; pilot projects; food system; landscape approach; visioning;
transition pathways

Systems Transformation