CORRECTION

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Correction: Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery

O. Hagelskjar<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />*, A. Creze<fnref n="3" />, G. Le Roux<fnref n="1" /> and J. E. Sonke<fnref n="2" />

Correction: *Micropl Nanopl 3, 22 (2023)*
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00071-5

The original publication of this article [1] contained incorrect widths for the error bars in Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8 due to human error in the visual processing. The depicted width was half of the true standard deviation. The incorrect and correct figures are shown in this correction article. The original article has been updated.

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00071-5.

*Correspondence:
O. Hagelskjar
oskar.hagelskjaer@univ-tlse3.fr

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1">¹ Universite de Toulouse, CNRS UMR5245, Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle Et Environnement, Avenue de L'Agrobiopole, 31326 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² CNRS UMR5563 - IRD UR 234, Geosciences Environnement Toulouse, Universite Paul Sabatier, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Arvalis, Institut du Vegetal, 6 Chemin de La Cote Vieille, 31450 Baziege, France</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Incorrect figure 6</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
Incorrect figure 7

A

SMP: RR versus A% (cumulated size range)

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

B

FMP: RR versus A% (cumulated size range)

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

C

SMP: RR versus A% (individual size groups)

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

D

FMP: RR versus A% (individual size groups)

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

Incorrect figure 8

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Correct figure 6</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>
Correct figure 7

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**B** FMP: RR versus A% (cumulated size range)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**C** SMP: RR versus A% (individual size groups)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**D** FMP: RR versus A% (individual size groups)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

Correct figure 8

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>

Published online: 27 November 2023

Reference

1. Hagelskjar O, et al. Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery. Micropl Nanopl. 2023;3:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00071-5.