# Sulfur allotropes and sulfur hydrides on the Venus cloud chemistry

Maxence Lefevre, Franck Lefevre, Anni Määttänen, Benjamin Frandsen, Robert Skog, Aurélizen Stolzenbach, Ashwin Braude

► To cite this version:

Maxence Lefevre, Franck Lefevre, Anni Määttänen, Benjamin Frandsen, Robert Skog, et al. Sulfur allotropes and sulfur hydrides on the Venus cloud chemistry. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2025, Sep 2025, Helsinki, Finland. 10.5194/epsc-dps2025-306. hal-05280496

HAL Id: hal-05280496

https://hal.science/hal-05280496v1

Submitted on 25 Sep 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Sulfur allotropes and sulfur hydrides on the Venus cloud chemistry

Maxence Lefèvre<fnref n="1" />, Franck Lefèvre<fnref n="1" />, Anni Määttänen<fnref n="1" />, Benjamin Frandsen<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />, Robert Skog<fnref n="2" />, Aurélizen Stolzenbach<fnref n="4" />, and Ashwin Braude<fnref n="5" />

## 1. Introduction

The cloud layer of Venus between 47 and 70 km is home to a vivid sulfur chemistry and microphysics, with SO₂ as the major gas species and condensed phase composed of H₂SO₄ and H₂O. This cloud layer has been extensively observed and modelled. The main discrepancy between the observation and models in the SO₂ vertical gradient throughout the cloud, no chemical model is able to reproduce the 3 order of magnitude decrease between the base and top of the cloud layer. Polysulfur chemistry could a candidate for buffering significant sulfur atoms, as it can grow into long chain and possibly condense. Strong absorption in Spectrophotometer data from VENERA 11, 12, 13 and 14 at 450–600 nm between 10 and 30 km recorded strong absorptions attributed most commonly to gaseous elemental sulfur Sₓ (Maiorov et al., 2005), and correlating S₃ spectral features from Venera-11 with an increase with altitude from 0.03 ppbv at 3 km to 0.1 ppbv at 19 km (Maiorov et al., 2005). The presence of S3 and other sulfur allotropes polysulfur (Sₓ) in the clouds has been hypothesized from Vega probes (Porshnev et al., 1987), but no definitive detection of Sₓ in this region has been performed. Sₓ is a potential candidate to the UV unknown absorbed (Toon et al., 1982; Pérez-Hoyos et al., 2018). H₂S were measured at ppm values below the clouds by the Pioneer Venus mission. (Hoffman et al., 1980; Oyama et al., 1980). DAVINCI will measure sulfur allotropes and H₂S in the deep atmosphere (Garvin et al., 2022). For the first time in 3D and with realistic photolysis, we studied the impact of these species into the Venus cloud chemistry.

## 2. Model

The 3D Venus Planetary Climate Model (PCM) is used (Garate-Lopez and Lebonnois, 2018). The photochemical model describes the comprehensive chemistries of CO₂, CO, hydrogen, oxygen, chlorine, sulfur and nitrogen down to roughly 35 km (Stolzenbach et al., 2023; Streel et al., 2025). In this study we added five species H₂S, HS, S₃, S₄, S₈ and 34 reactions to the gas phase chemistry. The PCM takes into account the condensation of H₂SO₄ and H₂O based on the hypothesis that clouds are at all times in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium, i.e. following exactly the saturation pressure profile of the calculated equilibrium H₂SO₄ aqueous solution. The same philosophy is used for the polysulfur condensation/evaporation in the model. We allow S₂, S₃, S₄ and S₈ to condense following (Zahnle et al., 2016). Photolysis rates are calculated online, following the same formalism as in the Mars version of the PCM (Lefèvre et al., 2021). The screening effect of all ultraviolet-absorbing species in the computation of the photolysis rates is taken into account. The radiative transfer computation is performed over the range of 0-815 nm. Four photodissociations were added following recent theoretical calculations, and the spectra of S₂ was updated.

<footnote n="1">¹LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, UVSQ, CNRS, Paris, France (maxence.lefevre@latmos.ipsl.fr)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Tampere University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Aerosol Physics, Finland</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³University of Helsinki, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Molecular Science unit, Finland</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA), Granada, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA</footnote>
### 3. Results

Fig 1 shows the zonal-mean distribution of condensed S₂, reaching 0.25 ppm at the cloud-top. It is the dominating species of the sulfur allotrope due to its low saturation mixing ratio. In total this chemistry can store up 0.5 ppm with a low SO₂ value below the clouds, and around 4 ppm with realistic SO₂ values. Polysulfur cloud chemistry appears to be a substantial sulfur buffers but not large enough to explain the SO₂ cloud vertical gradient. H₂S is stable with few tenths of ppm in the lower clouds.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Fig 1: Zonal-mean distribution of condensed S₂ in ppmv</figcaption></figure>

### References

* Garate-Lopez, I., & Lebonnois, S. (2018). Icarus, 314:1–11.

* Garvin, J. B., Getty, S. A., Arney, G. N., et al. (2022). The Planetary Science Journal, 3(5):117.

* Hoffman, J. H., Hodges, R. R., Donahue, T. M., et al. (1980). Journal of Geophysical Research, 85:7882–7890.

* Lefèvre, F., Trokhimovskiy, A., Fedorova, A., et al. (2021). Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 126(4):e06838.

* Maiorov, B. S., Ignat'ev, N. I., Moroz, V. I., et al. (2005). Solar System Research, 39(4):267–282.

* Oyama, V. I., Carle, G. C., Woeller, F., et al. (1980). Journal of Geophysical Research, 85:7891–7902.

* Pérez-Hoyos, S., Sánchez-Lavega, A., García-Muñoz, A., et al. (2018). Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 123:145–162.

* Porshnev, N. V., Mukhin, L. M., Gel'Man, B. G., et al. (1987). Kosmicheskie Issledovaniia, 25:715–720.

* Stolzenbach, A., Lefèvre, F., Lebonnois, S., et al. (2023). Icarus, 395:115447.

* Streel, N., Lefèvre, F., Martinez, A., et al. (2025). Submitted to JGR: Planets.

* Toon, O. B., Turco, R. P., & Pollack, J. B. (1982). Icarus, 51:358–373.

* Zahnle, K., Marley, M. S., Morley, C. V., et al. (2016). The Astrophysical Journal, 824:137.