<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple

Augusto Zanella, Nicolas Bernier, Roberto Zampedri, Silvia Fusaro, Giacomo

Mei, Jean André, Jean-François Ponge, Raffaello Giannini

► To cite this version:

Augusto Zanella, Nicolas Bernier, Roberto Zampedri, Silvia Fusaro, Giacomo Mei, et al.. The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple. iForest: Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2024, 17 (4), pp.252-268. 10.3832/ifor4584-017. hal-04679362

HAL Id: hal-04679362

https://hal.science/hal-04679362v1

Submitted on 27 Aug 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

Public Domain
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple

Augusto Zanella<sup>(1)</sup>,
Nicolas Bernier<sup>(2)</sup>,
Roberto Zampedri<sup>(3)</sup>,
Silvia Fusaro<sup>(4)</sup>,
Giacomo Mei<sup>(5)</sup>,
Jean André<sup>(6)</sup>,
Jean-François Ponge<sup>(2)</sup>,
Raffaello Giannini<sup>(7)</sup>

In this article, we propose a silvicultural approach that takes soil health into account. Using a biblical metaphor, the first chapter highlights the forest's critical role in the planet's future, emphasizing that forest biodiversity is essential for sustaining a planet inhabited by complex life forms like humans. The second chapter focuses to the soil, explaining how the biological dynamics of the soil are interconnected with the forest cycle, demonstrating that vegetation and soil form a continuous, co-evolving system. The third chapter explores the possibility of extending the forest cycle to restore soil functionality, illustrating how the recycling of the forest's biological past facilitates the emergence of a new, evolving soil-vegetation system. Examples of forest management practices in France, Italy, and Switzerland are presented, including graphs and mathematical models depicting the evolution of organic carbon in the soil and the distribution of tree stems by diameter, age, and stature. The description of uneven-aged Swiss forests, featuring fir and beech, is sourced from the Helvetica Pro-Silva website.

**Keywords:** Anthropocene, Adam and Eve, Forest Soil, Humus, Soil-conscious Forestry, Envers Forest, Forest Dynamic, Old-growth Forest

## Introduction

### The forbidden apple

Well-known biblical recommendation: "You can do whatever you want, planet Earth is yours, plants, animals, mountains, sea, clouds, everything. That apple tree you see in the middle of the meadow, only that one, behold, don't eat its apples." (Fig. 1).

Some 6-7 million years ago, the lineage we share with chimpanzees bifurcated, generating a branch of hominids. They differed from their ancestors because they preferred to stand upright position, on two feet instead of four (Brunet et al. 1995, Brunet et al. 2002). Until then, and for a few million years more, evolution depended on environmental conditions, first astronomical, chemical, physical, then increasingly biological. A list of incomplete, scientifically shared in the essential ecological

synthetic lines, that explains evolution and supports the content and conclusions of this article, is available in Appendix 1 (Supplementary material).

Little by little, the hominids changed the cards on the table: for ten thousand years now, but above all and definitely in the last century, evolution depends directly on the needs of this new species of living beings that we are.

We know that Hominids were an integral part of the forest in the Paleolithic and also in a large part of the Neolithic. It is contravening a hypothetical divine warning that *Homo sapiens* entered the Anthropocene. Only in the last decades of human history, the consideration of non-log products, under the names of ecosystem services or biodiversity, indicates a forest exploitation with a more conscious view of the biological value of this ecosystem.

The causes of human impact on our

planet are summarized in Appendix 2 (Supplementary material).

### The forests of the world

#### State of the art

The surface of the planet (51 billion ha = 51 × 10⁹ ha) consists of 71% oceans and 29%

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 1 - Adam and Eve in the Trauttmansdorff Castle Park, Merano, Italy. It is possible to conceive the primary forests that remain, like other biodiversity-rich environments on our planet, as “forbidden apples” for humans. In the sense of being able to understand that it is better “not to eat them”, as they are really essential for us, we humans as a dependent part of a living planet.</figcaption></figure>

@ Augusto Zanella (augusto.zanella@unipd.it)

Received: Feb 07, 2024 - Accepted: Jun 11, 2024

**Citation:** Zanella A, Bernier N, Zampedri R, Fusaro S, Mei G, André J, Ponge J-F, Giannini R (2024). The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple. iForest 17: 252-268. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4584-017 [online 2024-08-15]

Communicated by: Marco Borghetti

<footnote>(1) Dipartimento TESAF, Università degli Studi di Padova (Italy); (2) Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (France); (3) Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Trento (Italy); (4) Dipartimento DAFNAE, Università degli Studi di Padova (Italy); (5) Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (Italy); (6) Université Savoie-Mont-Blanc, Chambéry (France); (7) Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Forestali, Università di Firenze (Italy)</footnote>
of emerged lands (14.9 × 10⁹ ha). Of these emerged lands, 71% (10.6 × 10⁹ ha) is habitable (it is not bare rock, desert or ice). Ten thousand years ago, forests covered 57% (6 × 10⁹ ha) of habitable land; today 38% (~4.02 × 10⁹ ha), half (2 × 10⁹ ha) are almost intact and one third (1.33 × 10⁹ ha) are in the state of primary forest, i.e., naturally regenerating with primary species (FAO/UNEP 2020).

In 1700, the area devoted to agriculture occupied 3% of the habitable land, and grazing 6%; in 2020, these values became 15% and 31%, respectively; the part occupied by ungrazed prairies and shrublands reaches 14%.

Gradually, cultivation, grazing and urbanization have occupied 1/3 of the forest area (FAO 2020). As human populations living in forests are relatively disarmed and declining (Zhouri 2010), and urban populations continue to grow and require resources and food, the replacement process is called for to continue to meet the needs of humans and domestic animals (FAO 2022).

Can humans live far from Earth? Let's try to argue in the affirmative. It would be enough to take with us greenhouses full of plants and animals that will produce food for us in space, when we set out in search of other worlds as in science fiction movies. Is this journey in the company of a small productive part of the planet really possible? This topic is covered in Appendix 3 (Supplementary material).

What if “forest ecosystem services” did not exist? This is also a topic that goes beyond the heart of our article. If it were true, however, we would have to review our mentality. The in-depth analysis is proposed in Appendix 4 (Supplementary material).

## Indisputable facts

(i) For reasons essentially related to food and the contingent needs of humanity, humans have taken over half of the area that once belonged to the forest to make cultivation fields and cities (FAO 2020). About 4 billion hectares of forest remain on the planet.

(ii) A quarter (about 1 billion ha) of the forest surface is still in the natural state of “old-growth forest”, i.e., a forest that has reached a very advanced age without having undergone major disturbances by human activities (Leckie et al. 2000, Hilbert & Wiensczyk 2007, Adamic et al. 2016, Wikipedia 2024), and 20% of this can be classified as “intact forest landscape”, a forest area of at least 500 km² without remote human action (Potapov et al. 2017, Potapov et al. 2020).

(iii) About half of the planet's biodiversity is found in tropical forests. As their surface area has decreased, so has biodiversity. Overall estimated biodiversity losses outside forests in the period between 1970 and 2022 range from 18% to 94% depending on the region of the planet (Almond et al. 2022, Lambertini 2022).

(iv) Human needs for wood will increase by 37% between now and 2050 (FAO 2022).

(v) In 2021 we lost another 3.75 million primary forests (World Resources Institute 2022).

If we continue at this rate, we will lose all primary forests. Is that a big deal? If all forests were managed according to the rules of the latest close-to-nature (Aszalós et al. 2022), would this be a problem for the planet and for us humans? Why would soil-conscious forestry be more suitable for forest management than nature-friendly forestry? What does soil do that is important in practice that is not covered by close-to-nature silviculture?

## The questions we are trying to answer

The article revolves around the concept of forest soil and is divided in three chapters: Soil, Soil Conscious Forestry and Conclusion. Following the model adopted in the introduction, the insights are placed in the Supplementary material to streamline the article. Below is the list of questions we addressed.

(i) Soil: what is the dying process? Does the soil have an ecosystem history? What is humipedon? Does the soil carbon storage and quality change as trees age?

(ii) How do forest manager identify the key elements of a forest soil ecosystem? In how much time does a forest renew itself? How can exotic species be managed? How to tackle climate change? To what extent are coppices, urban parks and tree plantations forests? How much biomass can we remove from forests? Are the last primary forests really important for humanity?

(iii) What is the point of view of two forest managers?

## The soil and the forest

To imagine the underground world of a forest, we suggest that you turn the trees upside down in your mind to give them two tips, one outside and one inside the ground. The new double forest is closer to reality than you might think. Physically it is not symmetrical; underfoot the forest is more complex than above, because the soil matrix is denser, richer and different from that of the air. Considering that there are algae and cyanobacteria active even in the first 3-5 cm of soil, we can say that the luminous part of the photosynthetic process occurs above this depth and to a large extent outside the soil.

It is possible to see the soil complexity in Appendix 5 (Supplementary materials).

## The future of a living forest is preceded by its death in the soil

Without soil water, photosynthesis in vascular plants would also stop; the first step in the process is the splitting of water molecules to recover the energy from the released electron. The products of photosynthesis are transported everywhere, including in the roots and the soil. To bring light to the solar panel-like leaves, the trees

must grow above the other plants, and to do so they also need the mineral elements that are present in the soil. These mineral elements are not only those of the parent rock, but also those of the organic matter continuously recycled by the soil microorganisms. We are talking about wood, leaves, bark, flowers, bracts, cones, etc. or exudates inside and outside the soil, and also animal's excrements, dead animals or parts of them that live out and in the soil. These are hundreds of grams per m² per year that continuously “feed” the microorganisms and animals or fungi in the soil. In turn, these organisms die and are recycled, releasing the mineral elements that make up their tissues and molecules. In simple words, the soil is the belly of the forest, a belly fed by the living system of which it is a part.

Much of the forest is therefore under the forester's feet. Water, energy, nutrients, biodiversity, forest production and renewal all depend on the soil. We know that it is useful to distinguish at least three layers (herbaceous, shrubby and arboreal) to be able to understand the dynamics of the vegetation. From a functional point of view, to better study its complexity, the soil can also be divided vertically into three sections (Zanella et al. 2022):

(i) The Humipedon, with the organic horizons OL, OF, OH, and the surface organomineral A horizons. Much of the soil's biodiversity lives these horizons. These organisms evolve with the soil and are the key to understanding the litter recycling processes and the relationships between plants and soil;

(ii) The Copedon, in more developed soils, composed of newly formed mineral horizons E and B. In this layer, the processes of formation of new clays take place which migrate biologically and not in the profile and which can be related to the water cycle in the soil;

(iii) The Lithopedon including the horizon of fragmented rock (C) and the superficial part of the rock more or less altered but still in place (R).

A good knowledge of the soil is essential for forest management. Particular attention should be paid to the humipedon, whose relationships with the evolution of the forest are illustrated below.

## Either it is alive, in which case it is really “soil”, or it remains “rock”

There are no living organisms on the moon. For this reason, soil like that of our planet has not formed on this natural satellite. Constantly exposed to the disaggregating action of the physical and chemical agents of space, the lunar rock (identical in composition to that of the earth's crust) has and continues to alter on the surface, remaining inert. On Earth, instead, rock has been transformed into soil by living beings. You only have to imagine the process to realize the importance of this phenomenon. Ecosystems emerge from spatial dust (it is
possible that life originated from carbon molecules coming from space), first elementary and without walls, and then enclosed in even larger systems (single cell, groups of cells, etc.), composed of systems, and composing systems of systems. On Fig. 2 the animals do not appear, because the most important and numerous of them are barely visible microarthropods (Jernigan et al. 2022) or the invisible ones such as microorganisms (Baldrian 2016).

Regarding the functioning of the soil, there is a fundamental principle. Discoversed in the agricultural field, it can be stated with this phrase: "if you want to feed the plants you have to feed the soil organisms". For an illustrated study on this topic, please read Appendix 6 in the Supplementary material.

Bringing the discussion back to a practical and forestry field, just to take an example of this biological complexity, the role of bacteria in the digestive tract of earthworms, with the "priming effect" played by intestinal mucus, has been studied by several researchers (Barois et al. 1993, Lavelle et al. 1993, Fontaine et al. 2003, Bastida et al. 2019, Kuzyakov 2010, Li et al. 2020). There is also the role played by the mucus secreted outside (Barois 1992). Recently, Guhra et al. (2020) concluded that the specific adsorption of earthworm mucus constituents to soil minerals leads to the formation of mucus-mineral associations. The worms are not essential to the action of the bacteria, they just stimulate it, as do the root exudates, and the clays play a role through their developed surface. Without considering the biological aspects, Bramble et al. (2023) highlight a contrast between 1:1 clays like kaolinite, with a low developed surface area, and 2:1 clays like hillite or montmorillonite ("swelling" clays) which offer a contact surface (and therefore a habitat) much more important for soil bacteria. Earthworms also serve to promote contact between bacteria and clays and play a role in their transport because most bacteria need a vector to move and find their food (Lavelle 2002, 2009), unless it arrives via percolation for example or diffusion.

The relationship between the living and dead parts of an ecosystem in the process of natural evolution is also very curious, and involves the soil activity (Zanella 2024). Much of this underground world still escapes us, but it exists and we need to know it, even if we are still at the first steps in using this biodiversity. Recently, there has been a large debate about the topsoil microbiome (Bahram et al. 2018). For example, we know that climate change and human activities are causing a crisis in cork production, and that this problem is triggered by changes detected at the rhizospheric microbiome level (Maghnia et al. 2019). We must be able to prevent this trigger, to continue to grow cork oaks. We also know that soil carbon is found in aggregates and that microorganisms form

these aggregates (Jeewani et al. 2020). The large stable aggregates are in the Mulls, and disappear in the Moders. In the latter, organic carbonium is found in unprocessed or poorly transformed plant remains. Here we need to be able to recognize these humus systems in the field. Everyone now agrees that we need to know the microbiome to manage the forest well, a microbiome that changes in and out of the soil with the number of tree species involved (Uroz et al. 2016).

## The humipedon and the forest soil functioning

The evolution of the soil is linked to the evolution of the living organisms that inhabit it. To understand this phenomenon, it is necessary to carefully analyze the humipedon. In it, living beings build two types of structures that are extremely important for the functioning of the soil: the organic OH horizon and the organo-mineral A horizon. They are functionally related structures, as when one increases, the other decreases, and vice versa. The OH thickness increases under difficult environmental conditions. Essentially these are low temperatures, drought, frost, or harmful polluted/asphyxiated substrate for living organisms. The A horizon, on the other hand, increases in thickness (to the detriment of the OH horizon if present, which disappears) when conditions are favorable for the development of life in the soil, such as available water and suitable temperature, digestible and transformable organic matter. In order to understand the humipedon,

it is therefore necessary to look at the profile and keep an eye on these two diagnostic horizons (Fig. S3 and Fig. S5 in Supplementary material). In general, they are produced by different pedofauna and microorganisms: the OH horizon is the result of arthropods, enthytraeids and epigeal earthworms; the A horizon is instead produced by endogeic and anecic earthworms. There are two easy-to-find exceptions: (i) when soil conditions are difficult for living organisms, the OH horizons are almost devoid of animals and the biodegradation of the organic substrate is carried out by fungi. The resulting horizon is a nozOF, i.e., a non-zoogenic OF horizon matted with fungal hyphae; the OF is not transformed into OH as usual because it is not eaten by animals but digested by fungi; (ii) earthworms periodically abandon dry environments, leaving the organic matter to be ingested and transformed by arthropods; these are ants or termites, or insect larvae that can produce an A horizon morphofunctionally similar to that of endogeans and anecic earthworms (savannas, steppes, scrublands and Mediterranean forests).

Fig. 3 illustrates the dynamics of these horizons in an Alpine spruce forest environment. The phenomenon was studied for the first time in France (Bernier & Ponge 1994, Bernier 1998) and then ecologically circumscribed and confirmed in Italy (Zam pedri 2005). The opening of the forest draws light and water at the soil surface; large earthworms arrive and feed in the OH horizon, expelling organo-mineral drop-

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 2 - Soil has a history. On our planet the soil is undergoing an evolution that follows that of the rest of living beings. Crusto humipedons (Zanella et al. 2018) are thin and cover a series of very young soils ranging from biofilms to desert crusts. They are formed by microorganisms or very small plants, fungi and animals. In the forest they are very common on rock outcrops or on tree trunks. Bryo are humipedons of greater thicknesses made of mosses and lichens, and pedofauna. Rhizo are humipedons that are formed by the strong action of the roots of herbaceous or shrubby plants, in cooperation with pedofauna. Along a gradient that runs from the high mountains to the plains, Mor and Moder or Tangel and Amphi humipedons form, respectively on acidic or basic parent rock respectively. In milder, lowland environments the dominant humipedon is the Mull. Moving through the figure from left to right we travel through the time of natural evolution and soil formation.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** - Amphi humipedon in a montane spruce forest in the Alps. Left: a black organic OH horizon overlies an ochre organo-mineral A horizon. Arthropods or enchytraeids develop in the OH horizon; target earthworms inhabit and produce the A horizon. On the right: graph from Bernier (1998). There are many earthworms in the young or old stages of the forest and here the A horizon is very present and rather thick; in the central part of the graph corresponding to the stage of intermediate age of the forest, the A horizon tends to disappear in favor of a more organic OH horizon.</figcaption></figure>

pings. As the trees grow, they deplete the soil of nutrients and water, the earthworms retreat and the OH horizon reform.

When trees are young, they feed on soil resources. When the trees are adults and vigorous, they can return nutrients to the soil. Finally, when the trees are old, they fall and feed the soil with all their mass (André 2005). In general, the soil releases nutrients in the first stages of the life of a forest, then gradually rebuilt its capital immobilizing nutrients in shallow organic layers. And towards the end, it surpasses in nutrients to fuel the natural renewal of the

forest and start the cycle again. The duration of the periods of depletion, restoration and preparation for renewal change with the tree species and the forest environment.

In addition to the stage of the sylvogenic cycle, this alternation of soil horizons depends on the parent rock and the climatic conditions, which we know are particularly linked to altitude. This last aspect was carefully studied by Bernier (1997) (Fig. 4).

In a forest, the thickness of the superficial organic (OL, OF and OH) and organo-mineral (A) horizons change in space and time:

(i) when the climate becomes harsher for soil organisms, or when the soil becomes nutrient-poor during the growth of young trees, the biodegradation of the organic horizons slows down. The organic horizons are fed from above (loss by young trees of the leaves of low branches in the shade) and are also digested more slowly by the soil fauna. At the same time, the organo-mineral horizon A loses the entry of nutrients, which instead escape more rapidly because nourishing the roots of the rapidly growing trees; the A horizon becomes lighter in color and its glomerular structure breaks down and gives way to particular or massive structure;

(ii) at the end of the forest cycle when the canopy opens, sun, water, fauna arrive and the organic horizons can be eaten to become the organo-mineral horizon A; this horizon regains its glomerular structure and its storage capacity to store water and nutritive elements for the plants.

These two situations of the humipedon are called Moder and Mull humus systems. Named Amphi, a third system also develops between the two (Zampedri et al. 2023a); called humus "gemellare" (twin humus) by Franz Hartman (Hartmann & Marcuzzi 1970) and Amphimus in France (Zanella et al. 2001), also known in Germany (Graefe 2007), this humus system helps to understand how forest soil works, with interdependent and alternating organic and organo-mineral horizons.

Forests in extremely cold and acidic environments have humipedons that are particularly rich in organic horizons and poor in pedofauna; the humus system is a Mor. Forests of extremely calcareous and dry environments have humipedons that are rich in organic horizons but in which a relatively active fauna is present in favorable periods; such a humus system is called Tangel. Even in these extreme environments the soil changes with the age of the trees but the renewal is not linked to the transformation of the organic horizons by earthworms but can involve a larger number of fungi and animals that feed on wood in humus systems called Ligno (Fig. 5 below, left and right corners).

Humipedon changes coinciding with the spruce forest stages studied in France were also observed in Trentino (Italy). A doctoral thesis has studied the physicochemical causes that led to soil modifications during the development stages of the alpine spruce forest (Zampedri 2005), and has been recently published (Zampedri et al. 2023b). Summarized in Fig. 6, the general characteristics reported on the plane of the two axes of the multivariate analysis are, from left to right, a decrease in temperature and an increase in soil moisture; from bottom to top we read an increase in pH and the thickness of the A horizons, a decrease in total organic carbon and the thickness of the organic horizons. Acid-North and Acid-South separate well for these characters and along the diagonal

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** - Variations in the humipedon of a spruce forest as a function of tree age and elevation. From Bernier (1997), modified to make it compatible with the modern classification of forest humus. With increasing altitude, the climate changes, becoming less conducive to the biodegradation of litter (the main factor is the lowering of the average air temperature). This favors the increase in thickness of the more superficial organic horizons (yellow and purple) to the detriment of the underlying organo-mineral horizons.</figcaption></figure>
that divides the plane in two from the
point on the upper left (South exposure)
and on the lower right (North). Formations
on basic substrate separate on the horizon-
tal axis, along a soil moisture gradient. In
the 4 series, we observe an evolution of
the cyclic humipedon, consistent with
what was illustrated in the previous figures
(Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5), with an increase in
organic layers in the stages of rapid growth
of the forest and a return towards an envi-
ronment inhabited by earthworms in the
opening stages and the first period of for-
est renewal.

In the herbaceous opening (yellow back-
ground) we find a Mull, and exceptionally
an Amphi in the most difficult condition
(AN = Acidic North). In the two basic ones
(BS and BN), the second stage of renewal
(green background) is still characterized by
a Mull, while in the acidic environment an
Amphi to the south and a Moder to the
north are found. The third stage is the criti-
cal one (orange background), in which the
soil empties itself of its nutritive elements
and water, giving them up to the rapidly
growing trees, it is Amphi on basic and
Moder or Mor on acid. The fourth (blue
background), which in our forests rarely
exceeds 200 years, is a Moder everywhere
except in the best condition of BS (Basic
Sud).

What can be seen in Fig. 6 regarding the
inversely correlated determinants reported
on opposite axes (two opposite horizontal
and two vertical), could be interpreted as
general trends in the functioning of the soil
in high mountain Alpine spruce forest (for
more details on soil horizon genesis, de-
scription and biology, see Zanella & Ascher-
Jenull 2018): (i) the thicknesses of meA and
mA horizons, both generated by large
earthworms (meA = biomesostructured A
horizon: the key fraction of the aggregate
volume has a diameter > 1 mm and ≤ 4 mm;
mA = biomacrostructured A horizon: the
key fraction of the aggregate volume has a
diameter greater than 4 mm), oppose the
thicknesses of OF, OH and miA horizons
(OF and OH = holorganic biotransformed
litter; miA = biomicrostructured A horizon,
from arthropods, the key fraction of the
aggregate volume has a diameter ≤ 1mm);
(ii) the temperature at 10 cm depth op-
poses the humidity of the soil; (iii) the total
organic carbon of the soil increases under
conditions of difficult bio-degradation of
the litter.

From a general point of view, two phases
can be identified in the forest soil of an
Alpine spruce forest (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6): (a) a
period of “extraction” of energy and mat-
ter to nourish the future of the forest (first
150 years), the autotrophic phase (André
2005); (b) a period of storage of matter
and energy necessary to replenish soil re-
serves and prepare new foundations for
the future generation (second 150 years),
the heterotrophic phase. In addition, the
renewal of spruce appears to be favored
by wood in the final stages of decomposi-

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 5** - Forest stages and corresponding change in humipedon. The 300-year cycle of an Alpine spruce forest can be subdivided into two important periods for the soil: the first 150 years of progressive impoverishment of the soil, with energy and mass migrating from it to the trees, followed by another 150 years of soil enrichment as energy and mass that returns from the trees to the soil. Three initial Para humus systems have been illustrated in Fig. 4: Crusto, Bryo and Rhizo. The Ligno system at the bottom of Fig. 5, which corresponds to the biodegradation of wood, is also classified as Para system. Generated by animals and fungi specific to this organic substrate, this biological process of wood recycling is particularly evident on the stumps and branches left to decompose-freely after the removal of the tree trunk. Decaying spruce stumps are often and vigorously colonized by the renewal of the same species. The Bryo system often precedes the spruce seedlings on the stumps.

tion, at least in non-megaforbiae areas
(Gensac 1990). The role of the mosses layer
has also been discussed for some time, as

it seems to favor regeneration in the long
term but not in the short term (Motta et al.
1994). Generally, the circumscribed humus

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 6** - The development stages of the Alpine spruce forest, the corresponding humus systems, arranged by an ACP in the space defined by climatic and pedological variables. Figure constructed from the work of Zampedri (2005), published in (Zampedri et al. 2023b). Cutting the graph along the diagonal that starts from the upper left corner and reaches the lower right, the stations on carbonate rock (B, basic: limestone and dolomite; S and N, South and North respectively) are positioned in the upper half on the right, while those on acidic rock (A, acidic: granites and porphyries) end in the lower half on the left. High pH, CEC%, thickness of the mA and meA horizons, average temperature for the month of May, soil humidity and number of days with temperatures below zero push the stations into the upper left box. High organic carbon, thickness of organic horizons OF and OH and thickness of organo-mineral horizon miA, average soil temperature at 10 cm depth of months 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, absolute minimum in spring and autumn and average of the month of January, variables linked to the radiation budget instead push the points towards the lower left corner.
system that develops around rotting wood (limited to the stump, branch or root transforming in the soil) is called “Ligno”; the mosses system is instead called “Bryo” (Tatti et al. 2018, Zanella et al. 2018). Bryo and Ligno can develop as a single system directly on the rock, or even on top of each other (Bryo on Ligno), or superimpose on Mull and Moder. It is important to note that the humus systems succeed each other in time in the forest stages; that the Mull system develops in clearings and under older trees, while the Moder develops in the intermediate stages. The Bryo and Ligno systems develop on Mull at the beginning and end of the cycle, and contribute favorably to the success of forest renewal. In contrast, Moder formation (intermediate stages of a non-overmature forest) slow down and prevent renewal (while still protecting the seeds?). The rotation shifts of forest production depend on the cultivated species. However, it rarely goes over 100-150 years in Europe. A part of the necessary return on investments in the soil is thus lost in this way (André 2005). Let's take dead wood as an example of energy entry into the soil. Ultimately, wood corresponds to stored solar energy whose use is possible by making it available to soil heterotrophs and generating new trophic chains. A new ecological pyramid takes place in the forest when wood reaches the ground. Once the energy source (in this case wood) is exhausted, these living organisms are reduced, becoming partly dead organic matter in the soil, with a consequent dilution of the release of nutrients into the soil as their bodies are mineralized. The same process of ecological complexation/restitution within the forest occurs every time dead organic matter reaches the ground.

This is what happened to agricultural land too, which lost its organic matter following intensive practices that did not give the necessary importance to soil biology (Lugato et al. 2014, Montanarella & Panagos 2021).

## A soil-conscious forestry

Autopoiesis is the property that Maturana & Varela (1980) attributed to living systems in 1980, regardless of scale. This is a very interesting concept for foresters because it explains well what a living system is. Further information in Appendix 7 (Supplementary material).

### How to practice soil-conscious forestry

A forestry manager begins by recognizing the real phytocoenoses to which associate the potential equivalent ones. In them, it plans a complete forestry cycle, respecting the foreseen potential evolution of the system (composition of species, especially tree species, length of the life cycle of trees, all compatible with the practical and economic needs of forestry). Each forest ecosystem corresponding to a given phytocoenoses is called “forest station” (Susmel

1980) or “forest type” (Delpech et al. 1985, Del Favero & Lasen 1993, Zanella 1998, Del Favero 2004). We know that the forest type contains a relatively homogeneous environment in terms of biological, geophysical and climatic characteristics, and that it is divided into parcels by man for forest management convenience.

To prefigure the potential evolution of the system, forest planning is also based on the historical past of stands; in the parcels the manager proceeds with an inventory of the structure, age, height and distribution of trees by species. Historical and recent examples in Italy can be found in Mencuccini et al. (1995), Dellagiacoma & Motta (1996), Motta et al. (1999, 2002, 2010), Berretti et al. (2004), Del Favero (2004, 2010, 2013, 2018), Notarangelo et al. (2023). There is also a model for Italy relating to the altitudinal increase over the decades of the phytoclimatic zones due to climate warming (Pignatti 2011). For an article dedicated to the importance of the non-homogeneous structure of the forest as supported by Susmel (1980), especially when aiming at the conservation of biodiversity, please refer to the recent work of Savilaakso et al. (2021).

In general, the management plans include an important chapter on wildlife, linked to the natural renewal of the forest. Aspects of the soil are considered such as depth, rockiness, type of parent rock, slope, degree of coverage; often in the management plans there are chemical-physical analyzes (pH, bases, texture) carried out in points representative of the forest type. However, 50-60 years ago much more importance was given to humus, a practice that was then abandoned. The reason for this abandonment is due to the fact that the soil classification was purely descriptive (Sofo et al. 2021). For the superficial part of the soil called “forest humus”, there was also a lot of confusion in the terms (Hartmann & Marcuzzi 1970, Feller & Boulaine 1987, Zanella et al. 2001, Jabiol et al. 2004). As a precaution, in Italy many forestry technicians often reported Mull-Moder type humus in their forest management plans, which corresponded to a wide range of humus between Mull and Moder (almost all existing humus), which is useless for practical purposes. Today there is a standardized international reference for an effective classification of what is called the Humipedon (the organic - OL, OF, OH; HF, HM, HS - and organo-mineral - A - surface horizons of the soil - Zanella et al. 2022).

Forestry that pays attention to the soil should include an inventory of humipedons by structural type, and an inventory of the animal biodiversity of the soil. Studies on microorganisms would also be desirable, since the decomposition process depends on the relationship between known categories of fungi and bacteria (Xu et al. 2023) and on the soil type (Brown & Jones 2023). Each stand development stage of the forest is important for maintaining the

gamma diversity (Whittaker et al. 2001) and the whole community nestedness (Porter et al. 2023). The authors of the latter work argue for example that each stage of population development corresponds to specific sets of soil bacteria, fungi and arthropods; to maintain all of the biodiversity in the soil after a forest fire, it is necessary to reconstruct a mosaic that contains all the stages of forest development, the most important of these stages being that of old settlements.

Below are some points to consider for the formulation of a soil-conscious forestry, i.e., the application of silvicultural techniques taking into account the functional potential of the soil.

### The renewal of the forest

It is known that the basic principle of silviculture is to maximize the product of the forest by ensuring that the value of the forest itself does not decrease over time, but remains or grows in the future (Leibundgut 1943, Schütz et al. 2016).

The second thing that a forest manager asks himself is this (after remembering that: “Damn, when are Romeo and Juliet, whom I left at the bar last night and who were supposed to help me early this morning, going to show up?” – We will ask them for their thoughts on the article in the conclusions): what is the natural evolution of the forest on which I am called to intervene? Where is “my” forest going, is it changing and how?

In fact, today foresters know that if they do not intervene, if they let it grow freely, the forest will do very well (unless humans act on it from distance, diverting water courses, causing the acidity of the rain, etc.). But the foresters must make the forest produce, for economic reasons, and this becomes difficult in a climate that changes faster than it should, because we have to know where the forest is going as it adapts to the new climate (and new humans that influence the climate). The forest has centuries-old cycles, many times longer than human ones. Foresters do not manage for purposes aimed at their own generation, but for that of their children's children, and even for those further away.

In order to survive, the forest system (plants + animals + microorganisms of that environment) must renew itself. The signs of renewal should be sought in areas that support a humipedon, i.e., the sequence of organic (OL, OF, OH, when present) and organo-mineral (A) horizons at the surface (first 30 cm) of the soil. The humipedon is different in regeneration sites compared to that found in the areas covered by intermediate age and non-perishable trees (Bernier & Ponge 1994, Zampedri et al. 2023b). It is necessary to study the humipedon in clearings, under old decaying trees with more or less open foliage, near stumps or decaying wood and in all uncovered areas with herbaceous/shrub vegetation which often contrasts with that built under the areas
covered by intermediate age and non-per-
ishable trees. The humipedon changes in
the areas where the forest prepares its re-
birth. Recent studies have partially clarified
the role of light, temperature and also
herbaceous cover on seed development
(Xu et al. 2023). The size of the canopy
opening appears to play a key role. There
are even-aged forests that are renewed
due to catastrophic events (wind, aval-
anches, fire). In these cases, the change of
the humipedon occurs a *posteriori* through-
out the area opened by the incident.

When there are no signs of renewal, it is
necessary to find the causes of this lack by
studying the ecology of the forest. The
main characteristics of a healthy and bal-
anced forest are the presence of all the
stages of the forest (renewal, growth, sta-
sis and decay), occupying the surface of
the whole in due proportions and all with
their own specific humipedon, and a biodi-
versity correlated with the stages of the
forest. All this can be verified through phy-
tosociological surveys (list of plant species
by layers), census of wild fauna and pedo-
logical surveys (recognition of systems of
humus and, if necessary, list of soil animals
and microorganisms), in the different
stages of the forest. If a forest has a bal-
anced distribution of forest stages, then it
will also show an adequate renewal stage;
however, if this stage is absent, the rea-
sons for this lack may be related to the im-
balance of the system, in terms of specific
composition, excessive homogeneity of
age and structure of the forest, the ab-
sence or deficit of light on the ground
and/or decaying woody material. In a for-
est that lacks natural renewal it is very
likely that the older stage of decay does
not exist, or is not advanced enough. It is
then necessary to recreate the conditions
for its progressive and protected aging, in
order to lead it over time to the next stage
of renewal. The mistake of the silvicultural
past was not to recognize the importance
of this stage of forest aging. It corresponds
to the stage of reconstitution of the forest
floor, from which the renewal of the forest
ecosystem begins. At this stage, the soil is
biologically, physically and chemically the
most favorable for seed germination.

Remembering what was reported above,
also expressed in Fig. 3 to Fig. 6, we can
say that the forest shows a cyclical evolu-
tion, with phases of renewal, maturity and
death programmed in harmony with the
quality of the soil. When the forest is
young it removes energy and matter from
the soil to build the new population of
trees; when it is mature, it slowly replen-
ishes these withdrawals from the soil by in-
jecting organic substance (litter and exu-
dates) produced thanks to photosynthesis
and collaboration with soil organisms; dur-
ing the growth phase it gives up all its mass
to soil organisms so that they can grow
and nourish the new seedlings. These
phases are seen at the humipedon level,
with the growth in the forest of the OH

horizon, which shifts the Mull system
(without OH) towards systems with OH
(Amphi on limestone, Moder on acid rock),
to return towards a phase in Mull at the
end of the cycle when the stand opens up
due to loss of canopy.

Supporting the becoming of the forest

Each type of forest has its own stage of
regeneration characterized by typical vege-
tation and humipedon. The study of the
specific composition of the vegetation and
the characteristics of the humipedon of the
aging stage (deterioration of the topsoil
and revitalization of the soil) of the forest
provides valuable indications on the evolu-
tion of the system. By knowing the trend
of climate change and the phytoclimatic
bands of each region, the forester will be
able to interpret the dynamics observed
and glimpse the future of the forest.
Aware of the difficulty of the long-term
predictions required by forestry, the for-
esters will adopt a precautionary attitude:
they will intervene cautiously (with light
cuts) in order to accommodate the move-
ment they has perceived in the forest and
will periodically check the result of their ac-
tion. If the result is an increase in the vigor
of renewal and in the state of the forest in
general, the foresters will continue this line
of treatments (for example cuts in the old-
est stage of the forest); if the evolution of
the forest is not as expected, they will
carry out new studies to understand the re-
action of the forest, and on new bases they
will try a different intervention capable of
better accommodating the recent (even if
unexpected) movement of the forest (e.g.,
widening the holes, starting from the mar-
gins, not cutting species that you thought
were invasive, etc.).

Forest biodiversity

Respect for the evolution of the forest
concerns above all its biodiversity, even
the microbial one (Banerjee & Van Der Heij-
den 2023, Zhou et al. 2023). Biodiversity
should be understood as the functional bi-
ological whole of the forest (Ette et al.
2023, Kooch & Dolat Zarei 2023). It is well
known that old-growth forests contain old
trees of maximum height for each species,
and that the highest levels of biodiversity
are found in these forests (Müller & Bütler
2010, Della Rocca et al. 2014, Lachat et al.
2014, Adamic et al. 2016, Motta 2020, Savi-
laakso et al. 2021). It is also true that the
richest in terms of biodiversity are the hu-
mid tropical forests, where radiant energy
and water are never lacking (FAO/UNEP
2020) and where the trees occupy multiple
layers and reach impressive heights. It is
therefore likely that the “stature” of the
forest (height of the dominant trees) is re-
lated to the biodiversity of each formation
(Ette et al. 2023), in accordance with the
climatic region in which the trees grow.
From this point of view, Lucio Susmel’s for-
mulas (Susmel 1980) which relates height
(S = stature, the average height of the few

tallest trees in the forest, usually 3-5 trees
per hectare) to other parameters of un-
even-aged forests also have an ecological
meaning that could be re-evaluated. We
will show later how this can be taken into
account (see chapter “Examples in Alpine
environment”).

Exotic species

Out of respect for the original forest, the
forester should not introduce new species.
If species different from the local ones
have arrived in the forest, or have been in-
troduced in the past, the forester takes
care of the endemic species so that they
can resist the entry of the new species. If
the new species manage to replace the lo-
cal ones, the forester will support the for-
mation of the new ecosystem. The removal
of new species by complete eradication is
only possible at the beginning of coloniza-
tion. A few years after the new species in-
gression, it is useful to estimate whether
the intervention is more harmful and costly
in the long term than adapting to the pres-
ence of the new species.

This applies to all species, both plants or
animals. When the bark beetle kills spruce
forests, it means that this species that be-
came food for the bark beetle was no
longer in the natural balance of the system.
However, these trees are lost for our econ-
omy but not for that of the forest which in-
stead recovers them in the soil and will end
up returning them to a new forest popula-
tion, if left to evolve naturally. If the loss of
this species represents a significant eco-
nomic damage to the community, it will be
necessary to intervene with the awareness
that in the long term the replacement of
the attacked species with a new species in
equilibrium in the new environment must
be envisaged. Similarly, when the pressure
of ungulates prevents the renewal of the
forest, it is important to promote the rein-
troduction of natural predators to restore
the forest to its lost level of complexity. In
some cases, following agreed, careful and
respected conditions, the predator can
also be a human hunter. Functional biodi-
versity is the best way to guarantee the
homeostasis of the system and to combat
the arrival of exotic species and diseases.

The growth of the forest and the soil
organic carbon stock

The growth of the forest is continuous, as
its trees never stop growing (Stephenson
et al. 2014). For the future of the forest,
what really matters is the balance of the
entire forest for all the mineral elements
that compose it and in terms of biodiver-
sity. Those that remain in the forest as min-
eral elements useful for the development
of life are contained in the living and dead
organic matter (Ette et al. 2023). An eco-
system is in a state of growth when the
dead organic substance is greater than the
living one, as it is in the dead organic mat-
ter that all the living organisms in the
ecosystem draw in order to grow. Since
there are irremediably losses in the transition from dead to living organic matter (second principle of thermodynamics), the amount of dead matter is always greater than the amount of living matter. The growth of a living system depends on its biodiversity: if it continues to grow, it ensures the evolution and health of the whole (Hooper et al. 2005). It is not possible to stop the growth of the forest as a whole, except by reducing its functional biodiversity and its necromass.

It is known that in old forests, 2/3 of organic carbon is found in the soil (Luyssaert et al. 2008, Réseau Ecologique Forestier Rhône-Alpes 2016). We have not addressed the issue of carbon storage in forest soil because there is still a lack of a real connection between the quality of the humipedon (humus system) and the quantity and quality of the stored carbon. An Eumull can contain as much carbon as a Dysmoder, but the molecules in which the carbon is fixed are very different: in organo-mineral excrements from earthworms in the first case, in slightly decomposed organic substance and very organic excrements of enchytraeids and arthropods in the second.

The world's forest took 300 million years to form and reach this climate-dependent equilibrium; after to the last glaciation, current European forests took a few thousand years to recolonize the space freed by the retreat of the glaciers. Once the equilibrium is reached, storage should slow down and be equivalent to respiration loss. If it were natural, a thousand-year-old forest should have an accumulation rate close to zero.

Forest soils in France are sequestering substantial amounts of carbon (Jonard et al. 2017). The total stock (down to 1 m) was higher under coniferous than under broad-leaved stands (109.5 vs. 88.5 MgC ha⁻¹, p = 0.006). Throughout France, between 1993 and 2012, considering all phases (age classes) of the production cycle, forest soils substantially accumulated +0.35 MgC ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. Soil carbon sequestration (i.e., above- and below-ground litter production and decomposition, first 40 cm of soil, between 1993 and 2012) declined with tree age and was affected by stand structure. Jonard et al. (2017) proposed two linear models of carbon sequestration, for even-aged (y = 0.71 – 0.0056 x) and uneven-aged (y = 1.38 – 0.0056 x) forests, where y is the SOC sequestration in MgC ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and x is the stand age. Basically, these are two descending lines with a loss in storage rate close to 1.1 Mg ha⁻¹ in 200 years. For the uneven-aged forest the start is at 1 (for a 75 year-old stand) and the end at 0.26 MgC ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹; for the even-aged forest the start is at 0.71 and the end of the cycle at -0.41 MgC ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹. Roughly (average between coniferous and broadleaved), the total stock is around 100 Mg ha⁻¹; with the measured growth rate, and starting from a SOC value of zero, this corresponds to 100/0.35

= 285.7 years of storage.

As today's forests start from a relatively high SOC values (100 Mg ha⁻¹), why do we observe such a high positive storage rate? In non-Mediterranean environment, the measured high rate of SOC storage could be due to global warming, as a consequence of increased tree growth (Charru et al. 2017), though this does not happen in all forests, for example not in beech forests (Martinez Del Castillo et al. 2022). Higher in uneven-aged forest, it seems to be linked to different forest management (Achat et al. 2015). By extending the cycle beyond 200 years, the storage rate could become even higher (Saint-André et al. 2020, Ingyvarsson 2023), reversing the slope of the models of Jonard et al. (2017).

Jonard Mathieu, contacted via email, has expressed his thoughts on this topic in Appendix 8 (Supplementary material).

## Human economy and harvesting

From an economic point of view, the forester must decide what percentage of current growth that he can take from the forest to meet the needs of the human populations that depends on this resource. The lower that percentage, the less the loss to the soil will be and the better for the forest. It is not true that the forest would die, or burn, or become diseased without human intervention. This is a big misunderstanding that only applies to such artificial forests which lost their natural balance. There is no “right intervention measure”; there is only a withdrawal that interferes as little as possible with the growth of the forest. Withdrawal greater than the current average growth will inevitably leads to a decrease in biomass and a loss of biodiversity in the long term (through the soil, biodiversity feeds on and is therefore correlated with the primary production out of the soil). The removal of biomass (unless it is infected biomass that can reinfect the forest) corresponds to a loss of resource for the forest soil. We could also consider this loss in terms of DNA, with an impact on long-term evolution as suggested in Zanella (2024), but perhaps we are bordering on risky science. The reduction in the number of species in the forest is also harmful to the balance of the forest; the change in the percentage of tree species which tends to favor the woody species more suitable for the human market is a mistake if practiced on a large scale and in the long term.

The entire cycle of the forest must be kept active at all its stages. And with all species. The forester wishes to keep the entire forest as much intact as possible, respecting “reasonable” human needs, to be discussed from time to time, depending on the regions in which one intervenes, and taking into account the global, social and long-term needs of the forest. The forecasters should carry out only cautious “thinning” in all stages of the forest, with the aim of not changing the structural and spe-

cific composition of the forest and aware that the more they log, the more they will influence the future of the forest, and the more difficult it will be to predict the future of the forest (Ciancio et al. 1994, Ciancio & Nocentini 1997, Ciancio 2010, 2014, Nocentini et al. 2021).

The key points of a silvicultural technique that gives importance to the soil are:

* minimum harvesting: cutting and removing the minimum possible (instead of removing the maximum while respecting the vitality of the forest);

* the maximum prolongation of the life of trees: maintaining even the decaying stage of the forest (instead of interrupting the cycle of production in the moment of stasis of growth to obtain a high productivity);

* respect for the current and future forest structure: carefully thinning at all stages of the forest (instead of thinning to plan the growth and final cutting of a mature stand);

* respect for the entire biodiversity of the forest in the long term (Aszalós et al. 2022, Motta & Larsen 2022, Springer et al. 2024): biodiversity becomes the main value of the forest (instead of favoring above all those tree species that are most useful for the timber market);

* replenishment of energy reserves and mineral elements in the forest soil: it is recognized that the decline stage of the forest floor must be maintained because it ensures the reconstruction of the soil's nutrient capital of the soil.

## Examples in Alpine environment

The Technical Lines for Corporate Forestry Planning of the Province of Trento (Provincia Autonoma di Trento 2016), in the chapter dedicated to “Thematic inventory and the description of the forests” (page 55), the point of view of an eminent forester on the duration of the life cycle of a forest is reported (Thomasius 1996): “Just as ecologically oriented silviculture distances itself from the spatial ordering of schematic cuts (cultivation ordering) and moves towards a subdivision of the forest based on natural-type spatial units, it must also move away from the mechanistic categories of the typical temporal ordering of the clear-cut forest and move towards biological time scales. In relation to this, it must be observed that the different stages of development of organisms (juvenile, growth, maturity and articulation stages), which are to be considered temporal indicators of their life course, are reached at different times depending on the biotope (faster in case of good fertility, less in case of poor fertility) of the tree species (earlier by pioneer species, later by definitive species) and by the environment (first by dominant species and later by dominated species)”.

To attempt to associate these principles with a practical case, let's take the easily imaginable example of a mixed Alpine fir
forest (fir, spruce and beech), montane, with an irregular structure and a rotation of 150-200 years (very common, that is), which we want to normalize. Nowadays, very sophisticated tools and techniques for both inventory and forecasting harvesting are available. For the purpose of this article, the method that was once taught (Cappelli 1987), with the real and normal curves and the humps of the first to be cut to “normalize” the structure, is hasty but gives a good idea of how a forester works in practice on the forest with a chainsaw (Fig. 7). The universal law of the forest, and common to many living systems, is that an adult tree produces a population of many young trees. These new individuals decrease in number over the course of their lives, until they reach the single, last dying, tree of their generation. When that tree falls, the story of a new generation begins again. On the curves of Fig. 7, the phenomenon can be seen by moving along the x-axis from left to right; traditionally, foresters count the trees starting from the 20 cm diameter class; the part missing from the graph, those with diameters < 17.5 cm, would count in dozens of thousands of trees per hectare, a number that is drastically reduced in the first 50 years of the forest's life. Darwin's theory of evolution (Darwin 1859) predicts that over time, the trees best adapted to the environment in which they evolve (and that changes with them) will survive. Those individuals that know how to best cooperate with each other and with the other species in the system to use of available resources will survive (Margulis et al. 2000).

Pro-Silva Helvetica offers real models of uneven-aged forests online. The first of these is the forest of “l’Envers à Couvet/NE” (Pro Silva Helvetica 2021), with 70-80 trees ha⁻¹ with a diameter of 20 cm which ending in a single tree with a diameter of 150 cm, 58 m high and 276 years old.

In order to mimic intervention, we propose a more irregular and more frequent structure when sliding upwards in formations with dominant spruce, defined as “multiplane” in the Forestry Typologies (UPF-BZ 2010). Due to climate warming, these spruce forests will experience the entry of broadleaved trees and silver firs from below, as a consequence of the upward movement of the vegetation belts corresponding to the beech forest. Moving the structure of spruce forests towards a diameter's distribution closer to that of mixed fir forests (similar to that of Pro Sylva mentioned above) could be a step that many foresters could share. Fig. 7 shows that two identical distributions of the number of trees in the forest stages were followed. In Fig. 8, however, the two curves have been grouped together to form a single cycle of double duration. The grouping assumes that the forest not subjected to a silvicultural regime can have a shift that lasts twice as long as the current one.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 7 - The normalization cuts. In the figure the “norm” (theoretical) lines are shown in green, the crosses (+) indicate the real trees to be removed to normalize the distribution of the number of trees with age. The black points at the end of the cycle correspond to old trees, released to improve the biodiversity of the forest. The diagram shows that two cycles of managed forest can be inserted in 300-400 years. It is as if, in order to increase the woody production of the forest, the forester had removed the forest from its “overripe” high forest stage and had forced the forest to remain young. This action determines the increase of the surface occupied by the central stages of the forestry cycle (2 and 3, young and mature high forest), to the detriment of that in which the regeneration and old age stages develop; the latter shorten and overlap (1-4). The middle stages with Moder humus systems become dominant.</figcaption></figure>

The nutrients are found in different “reservoirs”: the A horizon of the Mull system (macroaggregates of organo-mineral substance produced by earthworms); the organic

OH horizon (microaggregates and minute particles of organic substance produced by enthytraeids and arthropods) of the Moder system; the decomposing wood

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 8 - Soil-conscious forestry involves: (1) promoting the aging of the population; (2) checking the presence of renewal in balance with the biological functionality of the soil; (3) careful sampling of the woody biomass in the humps of the distribution of the number of trees by age class; (4) doubting about the silvicultural action undertaken, and consequently, repeated monitoring of the forest's response in the years following the felling. For the forest to continue to exist, it is necessary to respect the return to the soil of the nutrients that the trees have taken to grow. In the past, the length of the restitution phase was shortened because it was considered not essential for the functioning of the forest. The few trees of stage 4 correspond to rare individuals scattered among those of the three previous stages, released not for their action on the soil but to increase the biodiversity of the forest (Leckie et al. 2000, Hilbert & Wiensczyk 2007, Jose 2009). The space occupied by a long forestry cycle has been managed in such way as to generate two shorter cycles on the same surface, gaining in terms of volume produced and production times.</figcaption></figure>
of the Ligno system (ligOF and ligOH horizons - Zanella et al. 2018). The groups of animals in each system associate the humus systems with the dynamics of the forest, allowing the release or fixation of nutrients at the right time. The A horizon is ready to release the ions that bind the organic and mineral substance in the macroaggregates; the OH horizon is instead made up of blocked organic matter awaiting to be processed. It can be transformed into the A horizon by earthworms in a favorable environment for such animals. Dead wood is also very important in the forest (Szewczyk & Szwrączyk 1996). The transformation of wood into aggregates rich in nutrients available for plants is due to a specific fauna and fungi (Rodriguez et al. 1996, Hardersen & Zapponi 2018, Tatti et al. 2018) that transform branches, trunks and stumps into spongy horizons that release nutrients for the roots of the plants. The humipedon evolves with the stages of the forest in this way:

* in the senescent stage and in the early juvenile stages, the A horizon of the Mull system (earthworms) and the ligOF and ligOH horizons of the Ligno system (fungi and wood fauna) develop;

* in the intermediate stages the OH horizon increases in thickness at the expense of an A horizon which tends to disappear (from a thick A from earthworms in the Amphi of the first stages of development of the tall forest, to a thin A not from earthworms in the Moder of the dense

perches and in the adult tall forest still growing strongly;

* in the adult stages of relative stability, a redistribution of nutrients takes place outside and inside the soil, with a consequent decrease in the thickness of the OH horizon, storage of nutrient elements in the soil in the form of macroaggregates of the A horizon, or in any case of more organic substance easily recyclable in dead wood and partially biodegraded.

In all these stages, the allocation of the resources produced by photosynthesis evolves accordingly and should be studied in more detail. It is known that trees invest more in trunks than in branches or leaves as they age (Hu et al. 2020). It is also known that they grow less tall once they reach sexual maturity (Suzuki et al. 2019). Moreover, we are beginning to understand the process of rhizodeposition and estimate its importance in the carbon cycle in the storage of this element in the form of organic molecules of different complexity in the soil (Villarino et al. 2021). It has been found that such deposition is associated with selected soil microorganisms (Tian et al. 2020), and that these microorganisms are often symbionts of plant roots that activate a new process called rhizophagy (Lowenfels 2022). Finally, it has been reported that Rendzina in different environments are different plant-soil systems and produce humic acids with different molecular weight and functionality (Radmanović et al. 2018).

Regarding the productivity of mixed uneven-aged forests such as that of l'Envers, Switzerland, it has been reported that that from 1974 to 2008 (35 years), the volume of the forest measured in 1975 has been removed (Pro Silva Helvetica 2021). This means a stand renewal rate of 35 years and corresponds to a huge cutting rate of 10 m³ per hectare per year (1000 m³/100 years).

Hence, it seems possible to remove in 35 years what a forest produces in a cycle of a few hundred years. Although such figures look realistic, there is probably something missing in terms of how the system works. We took the liberty of reproducing the figure on page 4 of the factsheet (Pro Silva Helvetica 2021) - which corresponds to the evolution of the distribution curve of the stems in 1896 (yellow), 1946 (beige), 2001 (brown) and 2018 (red) - and adding two new curves (Fig. 9). The additional two distribution curves of the number of stems with age were calculated using two growth coefficients (K) and two maximum diameters ($D_{max}$) obtained by the Susmel's formulas for two hypothetical forests in the mountainous area of the Abieti-Fagetum, one dominated by fir (blue line) and one by beech (green line). In both cases, the height of the tallest tree in l'Envers (a 58 m tall silver fir) was taken as the stature S in the formulas. The values calculated with the equations of Susmel (1980) for S = 58 m are, with fir dominant (eqn. 1):

$$K = \frac{4.3}{3\sqrt{S}} = 1.110859 \quad (1)$$

with $D_{max} = 2.64$ and S = 153 cm, while with beech dominant (eqn. 2):

$$K = \frac{4.54}{3\sqrt{S}} = 1.172861 \quad (2)$$

with $D_{max} = 2.33$ and S = 135 cm. Susmel's formulas were constructed based on measurements in Italian relict nuclei and primary (virgin) forests in Croatia (Susmel 1955, 1956, 1980, Klepac 1978) as a potential ecological model for the Italian alpine forests. By the way, the search for a key parameter that could facilitate forest management, in the eco-functional line of thinking of the stature (S) of Susmel, is still ongoing. Seidel & Böttger (2023) recently proposed a parameter called box-dimension (Db), based on laser measurements addressing the quantity and vertical distribution of plant material. This parameter could represent a modern alternative to the stature (S) because it explains 86% of the variability in the functional complexity of the forest and it is linearly correlated with basal area, mean height of the greatest crown projection area and biomass of the stand.

In Fig. 9, the l'Envers forest lies between the blue and green curves obtained with the Susmel's equation. It is interesting to observe that the formation of dominant fir with beech (blue) delimits the model downwards, while that of dominant beech with fir places an upper limit (green). From

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 9 - Left: re-working of the figure on page 4 of Pro Silva Helvetica, Portrait de la forêt jardinée de l'Envers à Couvet / NE. Harmony that happens in the soil between utility and beauty (Pro Silva Helvetica 2021). The figure represents the number of stems per hectare on the ordinate for the list of 5 cm diameter categories on the abscissa. It originally showed the curves corresponding to four historical years (2018-red, 2002-brown, 1946-beige and 1896-yellow) and also the norms (discontinuous black lines) calculated by renowned forest managers (Liocourt and Schuetz, in Pro Silva Helvetica 2021). Two normal functions have been added to this graph in green (with beech dominant) and in blue (with fir dominant), defined starting from the same stature (that of the tallest tree in Envers, 58 m), using two maximum diameters ($D_{max}$) and two coefficients of passage from one 5 cm class to another (K). On the right: the cycle of withdrawal and return that occurs in the soil in harmony with the development of the chronological classes of the high forest, as illustrated in chapter 2, and which is missing from the figure.</figcaption></figure>
an ecological point of view, this means that with the climate warming and the consequent rise of the beech belt, we must expect shifts upwards and to the right. The Susmel's curves are already shifted further to the right on the graph, and deviate in a curious way from the real ones, as if the young stages were closer to those of the beech forest and the old ones closer to those of the fir forest. Another puzzling is the distance of the dominant beech curve from those of the real distribution (those of l'Envers forest): it is like if medium- and large-sized trees were missing. These are likely the trees removed by foresters with production cuts.

Fig. 9 also shows a cycle of returning nutrients to the soil, which is only partially covered by the real graph and also by the graphs produced using the Susmel equations. The balance between extraction and return is in favour of the former in the juvenile stages and instead becomes in favour of the latter in the final part of the cycle (100-200 cm of diameter; 150-400 years of age). Extending the shift could allow more nutrients to be returned to the forest by making the distribution curves evolve upwards and to the right, as indicated by the orange arrows in Fig. 9. The increase in necromass due to the extension of the shift would eventually feed the renewal, which could return to the historical values of 1896. In fact, at page 12 of the report Pro Silva Helvetica (2021) on the forest of l'Envers, it is stated: "...not to mention that the most important thing is not what we harvest, but what we leave (Couvet, division 109, never 2009)".

Always in the spirit of Pro-Silva, on page 19 of the description of the uneven-aged forest of Tscheppa Verda (Pro Silva Helvetica 2016), under the picture of a beautiful specimen of Silver fir, an observation by Walter Trepp dated Aug 26, 1986 is reported: "...Is this tree sick? I bet not! Every year, at the end of fall, part of the needles turns yellow. This is how tree get rid of the dead needles. Trees with wide crowns – typical of garden forests – produce more dry needles than trees with narrow crowns in regular high forests. The scientists have obviously not yet integrated these observations!".

This is probably a way of restoring the nutrient potential of the soil which needs to be re-evaluated in silvicultural terms, allowing the trees to age beyond what seems to us economically invalid. Old trees produce more seeds, more pine cones or more fruit (Pesendorfer et al. 2020) than younger ones, as in the last period of their life they distribute the maximum of their genetic potential as an inheritance.

## Planet forest management

From the point of view of forest management on a planetary scale, we know that even primary forests are affected by anthropogenic climate change and therefore cannot be longer considered strictly pri-

mary. However, there remain forests from which nothing is harvested, that complete their full cycle by investing all their dead parts in the soil.

We believe that the time has come to decide at the global level (FAO?) to prevent the direct exploitation of a relevant proportion of these forests (e.g., 20% of primary forests called “Intact Forest Landscape”), considering them an inviolable asset of Planet Earth. For these “untouched” forests, an income could be established equal to that which would result from their hypothetical naturalistic exploitation. This sum would be paid to the countries where these forests grow, in order to preserve them as an asset of the Planet and of humanity. We believe that soil-sensitive forestry should be applied to all the other forests in the world since it is the only one capable of guaranteeing the general conservation of the planet’s biodiversity.

Noteworthy, forests have a very important impact on the climate and that they constitute real “biotic pumps”: Makarieva & Gorshkov (2010) calculated that the forests of our planet can generate and feed “flying rivers” – rapid overview of this captivating discovery in Pearce (2020) – whose existence has been proved for the Amazonian and Congo forests (Zemp et al. 2014, FAO 2019, Silva et al. 2022, Ferrante et al. 2023).

## Soil-conscious forestry and new forestry plantings in climate change

Climate warming causes plant species from lower altitude or latitude belts to migrate to higher ones. Therefore, species belonging to the lower phytoclimatic belt should be favoured in the upper belt, allowing current ecosystems to follow the ongoing global warming and gradually lose the least adapted species. In the plains and in the low mountains where the dry period of the year is prolonged, an OH horizon appears above the A horizon with a consequent shift of the Mull system towards the Amphi. In the mountains or in a more continental environment, when the rainfall is sufficient, the transformation of the Moder into Amphi and Mull is observed, with the reduction in thickness or disappearance of the OH horizon, and the integration of its organic matter content by the earthworms in an underlying A horizon. This would mean that in the environments that tend to become drier, the earthworm fauna is replaced by arthropods; in the mountains, however, where there is no lack of water, the arthropods are displaced by earthworms. Obviously, the change in the soil will soon correspond to the arrival of different plant species. However, these are personal observations conducted in France and Italy that should be confirmed by scientific investigations.

## Coppice forest, wood arboriculture, urban parks

From the point of view of a soil-conscious

forestry, coppices, plantations and urban parks are anthropized systems similar to agroforestry. These are ecosystems that belong to anthropic evolutionary lines and create new biodiversity. Although interesting from a biological point of view, these ecosystems are recent in terms of evolution. When they are located in phytoclimatic zones allowing the ecosystem complexity to grow up, and left to evolve without human intervention, these systems become new forests, and mix with the existing ones. From an evolutionary point of view, the coppice is a mutilated forest: humans have decided to bring the foliage to the ground, removing the trunks of all the trees. By doing so, they limited the forest’s biospace, dramatically lowering its potential stature for economic reasons, such as the use of wood as a source of energy. Moreover, the specific tree composition of coppices is often reduced, making them monospecific cultures as in agriculture. In wood arboriculture, the planted species are selected to maximize wood production; a system layout is used that facilitates mechanization; even if polycyclic with the presence of shrubby species, these ecosystems have nothing to do with real forests.

The coppice has a long history of coexistence with man. In the Italian mountain regions (which is almost the entire country) these forests have played a fundamental role in the development of human societies, substantially supporting the economy. For this reason, these forests have also been well regulated so as not to be lost. With the oil revolution, coppices experienced widespread abandonment, triggering a series of ecological dynamics more complex than assumed in the past, which are much studied and debated nowadays. To date, depending on the socio-economic developments of the last decade, these formations were subjected to restoration in various areas, and are now exploited again for the production of firewood and poles, while the inland populations are rediscovering and adapting uses (craftsmanship, family-scale woodworking industries) that were thought to be forgotten forever. There is a biodiversity linked to the coppice forest (Mei et al. 2020), just as there is that linked to the mowing of secondary prairies, often subject to protection at community level. As with the latter, the coppice forest has also characterized the traditional landscape (Piussi & Alberti 2015), thus it is at the basis of ecological and landscape aspects, traditions, uses and customs and therefore it should be safeguarded (Maiotat a et al. 2016, Mei et al. 2020).

Urban forests are often exotic trees, juxtaposed with criteria reflecting the functional aesthetics of cities, interspersed with meadows which are also very simplified and related to human recreational activities. Their management is entirely dictated by principles of safety and practicality that are not those applied in the forest. These “tree systems” are simplified human
deviations and manipulations, practical and
convenient from an economic and social
point of view, but they are not forests,
though providing the planet with new an-
thropogenic plant covers.

The soil of these tree systems is also dif-
ferent from the natural one, resembling
the agricultural soil, often tillied before
planting, or urban soil often containing the
remains of buildings and debris of all kinds.
In the long run, the dynamics of living or-
ganisms will return these soils back to a
more natural stratification. Being in the
plains or in the city, the humipedons very
often tend to become earthworm Mulls,
especially when irrigated. From a soil point
of view, a diminished forest corresponds to
a diminished soil. As in other situations,
provided that urban forests, coppices and
plantations are sustainable in the long
term (probably because they are limited in
extension and receive inputs from out-
side), we can consider them as highly an-
thropized forests but almost essential to
human development.

Agroforestry

From the perspective of soil-conscious
forestry, we consider agroforestry as terri-
tory lost to the real forests. Agroforestry
areas are hybrids between forest and agri-
culture where the laws of the natural for-
est do not apply. With agroforestry, agri-
culture is brought into the forest (or vice
versa, as in the case of forestry revaluation
of areas abandoned by agriculture). The fo-
cus here is on some human "consumption"
(Avitabile et al. 2023, Bausano et al. 2023).
In non-tropical countries, private forests al-
ready more or less managed by man are
modified to make them compatible with a
different exploitation model often linked
to agritourism. In tropical countries, plant-
ing of trees for timber production on aban-
doned agricultural land is not uncommon
nowadays all over the world, also as an ac-
tion to mitigate the climate warming.

Agroforestry creates a new clade of natu-
ral evolution, which may be economically
interesting, but which must be scientifically
separated from forest biodiversity. A sa-
lami made with pork from free-range pigs
feeding in the forest is obviously tastier
(and maybe healthier) than those pro-
duced with pigs confined in battery-fed
pigs. Would it be possible to create forest-
like environments for these animals, start-
ing from non-forest environments? From
the point of view of the soil, agricultural
fields that become "half forests" should be
preferred to forests transformed into "half
crop fields", to put it more directly.

Conclusions

Soil-conscious forestry is the application
of forest sciences research to principles
that at first glance seem to contradict
those of the past, that is, as little interven-
tions and as long a cutting cycle as possi-
ble. Actually, if we have come to these res-
olutions, it is because things are not going

as hoped: if we continue as before, the
forests could disappear. Perhaps, we do
not have yet the knowledge necessary to
manage natural ecosystems in the long
term. Since the future of humanity de-
pends on forest health and on the ability of
humans to coexist with the largest possible
number of living organisms on the planet,
it is good to make a conscious decision not
to touch a relevant portion of the planet's
forests within the limits of a worthy coexis-
tence, with enough food and comfort for
humans as well... is that possible?

Soil-centered forestry means helping all
forests to evolve towards a stage very
close to "old growth-forest".

The metaphor of the forbidden apple ap-
plies to aspects of forestry that are not ob-
vious. They deserve the full attention of
science: soil reserves and biodiversity have
limits that must not be exceeded.

Soil cannot be exploited beyond a certain
point. It is not just a matter of quantity.
Soil also recycles the DNA of the ecosystem,
which is the DNA of all living biota
that inhabit the ecosphere. It is from the
ground that the life cycle of the forest begins again. Biodiversity is not only the number of species, but also the functional web of relationships between species: when an ecosystem is destroyed, the network of communication and exchange that kept it alive is also lost. When parents or grandparents are lost, the foundations on which the family rested are lost. All the components of a human society are necessary for the good functioning of the whole, and the same is true for the forest. In order to live and evolve, it is also necessary to age and even to die.

"Are you sure that everything you wrote is useful for forestry purposes?" asked Romeo and Juliet, forest managers who were asked to read the paper and express their opinions.

"It is a manual of ecological forestry. The planet's biodiversity and forests are in danger. It is necessary to consider the soil as a living system in both agriculture and forestry because everything comes from the soil. One approach is to stop using pesticides in agriculture; another is to allow forests to age more."

"These are things that were more or less known, right?", continued Romeo and Juliet, sharing their perspective.

"What about the idea that forests grow better without forest managers?"

"Ah. Do you think science is bad for forests?", reacted Romeo.

"If there were no humans on Earth,
would other plant and animal species be
healthier?"

"Mhhhm... maybe... no doubt", an-
swered Juliet first. "But this is natural. We
are born with an intrinsic and unstoppable
drive for development that requires en-
ergy. To stay alive, we must extract energy
from organic matter, which introduces
death and degradation into the cycle of
life."

"Yes, but there is a forbidden apple: we
can only hope to survive as a society con-
nected to a living and autonomous system.
From a biological and scientific perspec-
tive, for now, the only way out is on our
planet with enough forest. The rest might
be short-term economic planning."

"OK, about this ancient apple story,
where religion blamed women first – Juliet
was a little upset – I do not see what this
article says that is different from others."

"When it comes to the apple, it might seem like the woman is at fault, but it was the guy who brought her right to it, and now he looks like an idiot. The article explains that young and old forests function differently; that we know little about soil microorganisms; and that we need to learn how to classify humus. Do you know the difference between a Mull and a Moder?"

"My forestry professor", Romeo replied quickly, "told me that humus is like the phoenix, a bird that can control fire and be reborn from its ashes. Maybe that is why it is difficult to classify."

Funding

This research was funded by University of
Padua, through the Ordinary Endowment
Funds for Research (DOR, Dotazione Ordi-
naria Ricerca) attributed to prof. Augusto
Zanella from 2007 to 2022.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mathieu Jonard for carefully
answering some questions about carbon
storage in the soil of French forests. The
email exchange is reproduced in the chap-
ter "The growth of the forest". This article
also arises from a long discussion involving
Prof. Orazio Ciancio and Prof. Susanna No-
centini. The aim of the debate was to find
practical indications of systemic sylvicul-
ture. We thank the founders of this mod-
ern forestry for the numerous suggestions
and for the evolution of thinking that they
have provoked in this year of fruitful ex-
change of ideas.

Data Availability Statement

Data from Silvia Fusaro's and Roberto
Zampedri's doctoral thesis are available
upon request (fusaro.silvia.17@gmail.com;
roberto.zampedri@fmach.it).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Achat DL, Fortin M, Landmann G, Ringeval B, Au-
gusto L (2015). Forest soil carbon is threatened
by intensive biomass harvesting. Scientific Re-
ports 5: 15991-15991. doi: 10.1038/srep15991

Adamic M, Diaci J, Rozman A, Hladnik D (2016).
Long-term use of uneven-aged silviculture in
mixed mountain Dinaric forests: a comparison
of old-growth and managed stands. Forestry 2
(3-4): 423. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpw052

Almond REA, Grooten M, Juffe Bignoli D, Pe-
tersen T (2022). Living Planet Report 2022 -
The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple

Building a nature-positive society. World Wild-
life Fund and Zoological Society of London,
London, UK, pp. 34-35. [online] URL: http://
ourworldinda ta.org/biodiversity

André J (2005). Activité et diversité des organ-
ismes hétérotrophes: les clés du bouclage des
cycles biogéochimiques et sylvigénétiques [Ac-
tivity and diversity of heterotrophic organisms:
the keys to the completion of biogeochemical
and sylvagenetic cycles]. In: "Bois mort et à cav-
ités. Une clé pour des forêts vivantes" (Vallauri
D, André J, Dodelin B, Eynard-Machet R, Ram-
baud D eds). Lavoisier, Paris, France, pp. 89-98.
[in French]

Aszalós R, Thom D, Aakala T, Angelstam P, Bru-
melis G, Gálhidy L, Gratzer G, Hlásny T, Katzen-
steiner K, Kovács B, Knoke T, Larrieu L, Motta
R, Müller J, Odor P, Roenbergar D, Paillet Y,
Pitar D, Standovár T, Svoboda M, Szwagryk J,
Toscani P, Keeton WS (2022). Natural distur-
bance regimes as a guide for sustainable forest
management in Europe. Ecological Applications
32 (5): e2596. doi: 10.1002/eap.2596

Avitabile V, Baldoni E, Baruth B, Bausano G, Boy-
sen-Urban K, Caldeira C, Camia A, Cazzaniga N,
Ceccherini G, De Laurentiis V, Doerner H, Giun-
toli J, Gras M, Guillen Garcia J, Gurria P, Has-
segawa M, Jasinevičius G, Jonsson R, Konrad C,
Kupschus S, La Notte A, Barek R, Mannini A,
Migliavacca M, Mubareka S, Patani S, Pilli R, Re-
bours C, Ronchetti G, Ronzon T, Rougieux P,
Sala S, Sánchez López J, Sanye Mengual E,
Sinkko T, Sturm V, Van Leeuwen M, Verkerk PJ,
Virtanen J, Winker HGZ (2023). Biomass produc-
tion, supply, uses and flows in the European
Union. European Commission, Brussels, Bel-
gium, pp. 202. doi: 10.2760/811744.

Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Forslund SK, Anderson
JL, Soudzilovskaja NA, Bodegom PM, Bengts-
ton-Palme J, Anslan S, Coelho LP, Harend H,
Huerta-Cepas J, Medema MH, Maltz MR, Mun-
 dra S, Olsson PA, Pent M, Pölme S, Sunagawa S,
Ryberg M, Tedersoo L, Bork P (2018). Structure
and function of the global topsoil microbiome.
Nature 560 (7717): 233-237. doi: 10.1038/s415
8-018-0386-6

Baldrian P (2016). Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 201: fuw040. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw040

Banerjee S, Van Der Heijden MGA (2023). Soil mi-
crobiomes and one health. Nature Reviews Mi-
crobiology 21: 6-20. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-0079-w

Barois I (1992). Mucus production and microbial activity in the gut of two species of Amynthas (Megascolectidae) from cold and warm tropical climates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24 (12): 1507-1510. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90141-1

Barois I, Villemin G, Lavelle P, Toutain F (1993).
Transformation of the soil structure through
Pontoscolex corethrurus (Oligochaeta). intesti-
nal tract. Geoderma 56: 57-66. doi: 10.1016/001
6-7061(93)90100-Y

Bastida F, García C, Fierer N, Eldridge DJ, Bowker
MA, Abades S, Alfaro FD, Asefaw Berhe A, Cut-
ler NA, Gallardo A, García-Velázquez L, Hart SC,
Hayes PE, Hernández T, Hseu ZY, Jehmlich N,
Kirchmair M, Lambers H, Neuhauser S, Peña-
Ramírez VM, Pérez CA, Reed SC, Santos F, Sie-
be C, Sullivan BW, Trivedi P, Vera A, Williams

MA, Luis Moreno J, Delgado-Baquerizo M
(2019). Global ecological predictors of the soil
priming effect. Nature Communications 10 (1):
423. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11472-7

Bausano G, Masiero M, Migliavacca M, Pette-
nella D, Rougieux P (2023). Food, biofuels or
cosmetics? Land-use, deforestation and CO₂
emissions embodied in the palm oil consump-
tion of four European countries: a biophysical
accounting approach. Agricultural and Food
Economics 11: 35-35. doi: 10.1186/s40100-023-00268-5

Bernier N (1997). Fonctionnement biologique des humus et dynamique des pessières alpines. Le cas de la forêt de Macot-la-Plagne (Savoie) [Biological functioning of humus and dynamics of alpine spruce forests. The case of the Macot-la-Plagne forest (Savoie)]. Ecologie 28: 23-44. [in French]

Bernier N (1998). Earthworm feeding activity and development of the humus profile. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26: 215-223. doi: 10.1007/s003740050370

Bernier N, Ponge JF (1994). Humus form dynam-
ics during the sylvogenetic cycle in a mountain
spruce forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26
183-220. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90161-9

Berretti R, Lingua E, Motta R, Piussi P (2004).
Classificazione strutturale dei popolamenti
forestali nella Riserva forestale integrale della
Valbona a Paneveggio (TN) [Structural classifi-
cation of forest stands in the Valbona integral
forest reserve in Paneveggio (TN)]. L'Italia
Forestale e Montana 59: 98-118. [in Italian]

Bramble DSE, Ulrich S, Schöning I, Mikutta R,
Brandt L, Poll C, Kandeler E, Mikutta C, Konrad
A, Siemens J, Yang Y, Polle A, Schall P, Ammer
C, Kaiser K, Schrimpf M (2023). Formation of
mineral-associated organic matter in temper-
ate soils is primarily controlled by mineral type
and modified by land use and management in-
tensity. Global Change Biology 30 (1): 71. doi:
10.1111/gcb.17024

Brown RW, Jones DL (2023). Plasticity of micro-
bial substrate carbon use efficiency in response
to changes in plant carbon input and soil or-
ganic matter status. Soil Biology and Biochem-
istry 188: 109230. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.10
9230

Brunet M, Beauvilain A, Coppens Y, Heintz E,
Moutaye AHE, Pilbeam D (1995). The first aus-
tralopithecine 2,500 kilometres west of the Rift
Valley (Chad). Nature 378: 273-275. doi: 10.103
8/378273a0

Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, Mackaye HT, Likius
A, Ahounta D, Beauvilain A, Blondel C, Boche-
rens H, Boisserie J-R, Bonis LD, Coppens Y, De-
jax J, Denys C, Duringer P, Eisenmann V, Fano-
ne G, Fronty P, Geraads D, Lehmann T, Lihoreau
F, Louchart A, Mahamat A, Merceron G,
Mouchelin G, Otero O, Campomanes PP, Leon
MPD, Jean-Claude Rage Sapanet M, Schuster
M, Sudre J, Tassy P, Valentin X, Vignaud P, Viriot
L, Zazzo A, Zollikofer C (2002). A new hominid
from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central
Africa. Nature 418: 145-151. doi: 10.1038/nature
00879

Cappelli M (1987). Selvicoltura generale [General silviculture]. Edagricole, Bologna, Italy, pp. 300. [in Italian]

Charru M, Seynave I, Hervé J-C, Bertrand R, Bon-

temps J-D (2017). Recent growth changes in Western European forests are driven by climate warming and structured across tree species climatic habitats. Annals of Forest Science 74 (2): 4. doi: 10.1007/s13595-017-0626-1

Ciancio O (2010). La teoria della selvicoltura siste-
temica, le “sterili disquisizioni” e il sonnambu-
lismo dell'intellighenzia forestale [The theory
of systemic silviculture, the “sterile disquisi-
tions” and the sleepwalking of the forestry in-
telligentsia]. Italian Academy of Forest Sci-
ences, Firenze, Italy, pp. 789-794. [in Italian]

Ciancio O (2014). Storia del pensiero forestale. Selvicoltura, filosofia, etica [History of forestry thought. Forestry, philosophy, ethics]. Rubettino Ed., Soveria Mannelli, CZ, Italy, pp. 556. [in Italian]

Ciancio O, Nocentini S (1997). The forest and man: the evolution of forestry thought from modern humanism to the culture of complexity. Systemic silviculture and management on natural bases. In: "The Forest and Man". Academy Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Florence, Italy, pp. 23-114. [in Italian]

Ciancio O, Iovino F, Nocentini S (1994). La teoria del bosco normale [The theory of the normal forest]. L’italia Forestale e Montana 49: 446-462.

Darwin CMA (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, Albemarle Street, London, UK.

Del Favero R (2004). I boschi delle regioni alpine italiane. Tipologia, funzionamento, selvicoltura [The forests of the Italian Alpine regions. Typology, functioning, silviculture]. CLEUP, Padova, Italy. [in Italian]

Del Favero R (2010). I boschi delle regioni del-
l'Italia centrale. Tipologia, funzionamento, sel-
vicoltura [The forests of the regions of central
Italy. Typology, functioning, silviculture]. Scien-
ze agrarie Ed., CLEUP, Padova, Italy, pp. 426. [in
Italian]

Del Favero R (2013). I boschi delle regioni alpine italiane. Tipologia, funzionamento, selvicoltura [The forests of the Italian Alpine regions. Typology, functioning, silviculture] (2nd edn). Scienze forestali Ed., CLEUP, Padova, Italy, pp. 400. [in Italian]

Del Favero R (2018). I boschi delle regioni meridionali e insulari d’Italia. Tipologia, funzionamento, selvicoltura [The forests of the southern and insular regions of Italy. Typology, functioning, silviculture]. CLEUP, Padova, Italy, pp. 472. [in Italian]

Del Favero R, Lasen C (1993). La vegetazione forestale del Veneto [Forest vegetation of Veneto]. Libreria Progetto, Padova, Italy, pp. 313. [in Italian]

Della Rocca F, Stefanelli S, Pasquaretta C, Cam-
panaro A, Bogliani G (2014). Effect of dead-
wood management on saproxylic beetle rich-
ness in the floodplain forests of northern Italy:
some measures for deadwood sustainable use.
Journal of Insect Conservation 18: 121-136. doi:
10.1007/s10841-014-9620-1

Dellagiacoma F, Motta R (1996). Ricerche sul-
l'ecologia della peccata subalpina nella foresta
di Paneveggio [Research on the ecology of the
subalpine spruce forest in the Paneveggio for-
est]. Dendronatura 17 (1): 77-86 17: 77-86. [in
Italian]

Delpech R, Dumé G, Galmiche F, Timbal J (1985). Typologie des stations forestières - vocabulaire [Typology of forest stations - vocabulary]. Institut pour le Développement forestier, Ministère de l'agriculture et des forêts, Direction des forêts, Paris, France, pp. 244. [in French]

Ette J-S, Sallmannshofer M, Geburek T (2023). Assessing forest biodiversity: a novel index to consider ecosystem, species, and genetic diversity. Forests 14: 709. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00779-w

FAO/UNEP (2020). The state of the world's forests 2020. Forest, biodiversity and people. Food and Agriculture Organization - FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 190.

FAO (2019). Flying Rivers - how forests affect water availability downwind and not just downstream. Forest and Water Programme News, FAO, Rome, Italy, web site. [online] URL: http://www.fao.org/in-action/forest-and-water-programme/news/news-detail/en/c/1190278/

FAO (2020). Global forest resources assessment 2020: main report. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 14.

FAO (2022). Global forest sector outlook 2050: assessing future demand and sources of timber for a sustainable economy - Background paper for the state of the world's forests 2022. FAO Forestry Working Paper no. 31, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 118.

Feller C, Boulaine J (1987). La réapparition du mot humus au XVIIe siècle et sa signification agronomique [The reappearance of the word humus in the 17th century and its agronomic meaning]. Revue Forestière Française 39: 487-495. [in French] doi: 10.4267/2042/25821

Ferrante L, Getirana A, Baccaro FB, Schöngart J, Leonel ACM, Gaiga R, Garey MV, Fearnside PM (2023). Effects of Amazonian flying rivers on frog biodiversity and populations in the Atlantic rainforest. Conservation Biology 37 (3): 153. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14033

Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003). The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35: 837-843. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8

Gensac P (1990). Régénération en altitude de l'épicéa (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) sur les souches dans les Alpes françaises High altitude regeneration of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on stumps in the French Alps. Annales des Sciences Forestières 47: 173-182. [in French] doi: 10.1051/forest:19900208

Graefe U (2007). Gibt es in Deutschland die Humsform Amphi? [[Is there a humus form called Amphi in Germany?]. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft 110: 459-460. [in German]

Guhra T, Stolze K, Schweizer S, Totsche KU (2020). Earthworm mucus contributes to the formation of organo-mineral associations in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 145: 107785-107785. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107785

Hardersen S, Zapponi L (2018). Wood degradation and the role of saproxylic insects for ligno-forms. Applied Soil Ecology 123: 334-338. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.003

Hartmann F, Marcuzzi G (1970). Diagnosi degli humus forestali su basi biomorfologiche [Diagnosis of forest humus on biomorphological

bases]. CEDAM, Padova, Italy, pp. 284. [in Italian]

Hilbert J, Wiensczyk A (2007). Old-growth definitions and management: a literature review. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 8: 15-31.

Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3-35. doi: 10.1890/04-0922

Hu M, Lehtonen A, Minunno F, Mäkelä A (2020). Age effect on tree structure and biomass allocation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Annals of Forest Science 77: 90-90. doi: 10.1007/s13595-020-00988-4

Ingvarsson E (2023). Soil carbon stocks in old-growth forests. Drivers of variability in soil organic carbon stocks in old growth boreal forests. Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Umeå University, Sweden, pp. 1-18.

Jabiol B, Zanella A, Englisch M, Hager H, Katzensteiner K, De Waal R (2004). Towards a European classification of forest humus forms. In: Proceedings of the "Eurosoil Congress 2004". Freiburg (Germany) 4-12 Sept 2004. Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 10.

Jeewani PH, Gunina A, Tao L, Zhu Z, Kuzyakov Y, Van Zwieten L, Guggenberger G, Shen C, Yu G, Singh BP, Pan S, Luo Y, Xu J (2020). Rusty sink of rhizodeposits and associated keystone microbiomes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 147: 107840. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107840

Jernigan A, Kao-Kniffin J, Pethybridge S, Wicks K (2022). Soil microarthropod effects on plant growth and development. Plant and Soil 483 (1-2): 27-45. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05766-x

Jonard M, Nicolas M, Coomes DA, Caignet I, Saenger A, Ponette Q (2017). Forest soils in France are sequestering substantial amounts of carbon. Science of the Total Environment 574: 616-628. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.028

Jose S (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforestry Systems 76: 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

Klepac D (1978). Pianificazione e governo delle abetine disetanee e dei rovereti della Croazia [Planning and management of uneven-aged forest and oak forests in Croatia]. Corsi di Cultura in Ecologia 1976-1977, Padova, Italy, pp. 59. [in Italian]

Kooch Y, Dolat Zarei F (2023). Soil function indicators below shrublands with different species composition. Catena 227: 107111. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107111

Kuzyakov Y (2010). Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 1363-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003

Lachat T, Brang P, Bolliger M, Bollmann K, Brändli U-B, Bütler R, Herrmann S, Schneider O, Wermelinger B (2014). Bois mort en forêt. Formation, importance et conservation [Dead wood in forests. Formation, importance and conservation. Swiss Federal Institute for Scien-

tific Research]. Institut fédéral de recherches - WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland, pp. 12. [in French]

Lambertini M (2022). Living planet report 2022. Wildlife populations plummet by 69%, Director General, WWF International, web site. [online] URL: http://livingplanet.panda.org

Lavelle P, Blanchart E, Martin A, Martin S, Spain A (1993). A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25: 130-150. doi: 10.2307/2389178

Lavelle P (2002). Functional domains in soils. Ecological Research 17: 441-450. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00509.x

Lavelle P (2009). Ecology and the challenge of a multifunctional use of soil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44: 803-810. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2009000800003

Leckie S, Vellend M, Bell G, Waterway MJ, Lechowicz MJ (2000). The seed bank in an old-growth, temperate deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 181-192. doi: 10.1139/b99-176

Leibundgut H (1943). Über Waldbau auf naturgesetzliche Grundlage [About forestry based on natural laws]. In: "Beiheft zu den Zeitschriften des Schweizerischen Forstvereins", vol. 21. SLUB, Zürich, Switzerland, pp. 141-155. [in German]

Li J, Zhou M, Alaei S, Bengtson P (2020). Rhizosphere priming effects differ between Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine seedlings cultivated under two levels of light intensity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 145 (6): 107788. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107788

Lowenfels J (2022). Teaming with bacteria. The organic gardener's guide to endophytic bacteria and the rhizophagy cycle. Timber Press, Inc., Portland, OR, USA, pp. 172.

Lugato E, Bampa F, Panagos P, Montanarella L, Jones A (2014). Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modeling a comprehensive set of management practices. Global Change Biology 20: 3557-3567. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12551

Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Börner A, Knohl A, Hessemöller D, Law BE, Ciais P, Grace J (2008). Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455: 213-215. doi: 10.1038/nature07276

Maghnia FZ, Abbas Y, Mahé F, Prin Y, El Ghach-touli N, Duponnois R, Sanguin H (2019). The rhizosphere microbiome: a key component of sustainable cork oak forests in trouble. Forest Ecology and Management 434 (7): 29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.002

Mairota P, Manetti MC, Amorini E, Pelleri F, Terradura M, Frattegiani M, Savini P, Grohmann F, Mori P, Terzuolo PG, Piussi P (2016). Opportunities for coppice management at the landscape level: the Italian experience. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 9: 775-782. doi: 10.3832/ifor1865-009

Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG (2010). The biotic pump: condensation, atmospheric dynamics and climate. International Journal of Water. 5(4): 365. doi: 10.1504/IJW.2010.038729

Margulis L, Sagan D, Eldredge N (2000). What is life? University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 288.

Martinez Del Castillo E, Zang CS, Buras A, Hack-
The soil-conscious forestry and the forbidden apple

et-Pain A, Esper J, Serrano-Notivoli R, Hartl C, Weigel R, Klesse S, Resco De Dios V, Scharnweber T, Dorado-Liñán I, Van Der Maaten-Theunissen M, Van Der Maaten E, Jump A, Mikac S, Banzragch B-E, Beck W, Cavin L, Claessens H, Cada V, Cufar K, Dulamsuren C, Gričar J, Gil-Pelegrín E, Janda P, Kazimirovic M, Kreyling J, Latte N, Leuschner C, Longares LA, Menzel A. Merela M, Motta R, Muffler L, Nola P, Petritan AM, Petritan IC, Prislan P, Rubio-Cuadrado A, Rydval M, Stajić B, Svoboda M, Toromani E, Trotsiuk V, Wilmking M, Zlatanov T, De Luis M (2022). Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests. Communications Biology 5: 163-163. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03107-3

Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 146.

Mei G, Pesaresi S, Corti G, Cocco S, Colpi C, Taffentani F (2020). Changes in vascular plant species composition, top-soil and seed-bank along cop-pice rotation in an *Ostrya carpinifolia* forest. Plant Biosystems 154: 259-268. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2019.1609618

Mencuccini M, Piussi P, Sulli A (1995). 30 years of seed production in a subalpine Norway Spruce forest. Patterns of temporal and spatial variation. Forest Ecology and Management 76: 109-125. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03555-0

Montanarella L, Panagos P (2021). The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal. Land Use Policy 100 (4): 104950. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950

Motta R (2020). Why do we have to increase deadwood in our forests? How much deadwood does the forest need? Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 17: 92-100. [in Italian with English abstract] doi: 10.3832/efor3683-017

Motta R, Larsen JB (2022). A new paradigm for sustainable forest management: closeR to nature forest management. Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 19: 52-62. [in Italian with English abstract] doi: 10.3832/efor4124-019

Motta R, Berretti R, Castagneri D, Lingua E, Nola P, Vacchiano G (2010). Stand and coarse woody debris dynamics in subalpine Norway spruce forests withdrawn from regular management. Annals of Forest Science 67 (8): 803. doi: 10.1051/forest/2010040

Motta R, Brang P, Frehner M, Ott E (1994). Cop-ertura muscinale e rinnovazione di abete rosso (*Picea abies* L.). nella peccetta subalpina di Sedrum (Grigioni, Svizzera) [Moss cover and regeneration of Norway spruce (*Picea abies* L.) in the subalpine Sedrum spruce forest (Graubün-den, Switzerland)]. Monti e Boschi 3: 49-56. [in Italian]

Motta R, Nola P, Piussi P (1999). Structure and stand development in three subalpine Norway spruce (*Picea abies* (L.). Karst.). stands in Pan-eveggio (Trento, Italy). Global Ecology and Bio-diversity 8: 455-473. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00165.x

Motta R, Nola P, Piussi P (2002). Long-term investigations in a strict forest reserve in the eastern Italian Alps: spatio-temporal origin and development in two multi-layered subalpine stands. Journal of Ecology 90: 495-507. doi:

10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00685.x

Müller J, Bütler R (2010). A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. European Journal of Forest Research 129: 981-992. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5

Nocentini S, Ciancio O, Portoghesi L, Corona P (2021). Historical roots and the evolving science of forest management under a systemic perspective. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 51: 163-171. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0293

Notarangelo M, Carrer M, Lingua E, Puletti N, Torresan C (2023). Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of north-eastern Italy. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 16: 385-391. doi: 10.3832/ifor4335-016

Pearce F (2020). Weather makers. Science 368 (6497): 1302-1305. doi: 10.1126/science.368.6497.1302

Pesendorfer MB, Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Borowski Z, Kantorowicz W, Espelta JM, Fernández-Martínez M (2020). Investigating the relationship between climate, stand age, and temporal trends in masting behavior of European forest trees. Global Change Biology 26: 1654-1667. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14945

Pignatti G (2011). Forest vegetation in view of some scenarios of climate change in Italy. Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 8: 1-12. [in Italian with English abstract] doi: 10.3832/efor0650-008

Piussi P, Alberti G (2015). Selvicoltura generale. Boschi, società e tecniche colturali [Silviculture. Forests, societies, and coltural techniques]. Compagnia delle Foreste, Arezzo, Italy, pp. 432. [in Italian]

Porter TM, Smenderovac E, Morris D, Venier L (2023). All boreal forest successional stages needed to maintain the full suite of soil biodiversity, community composition, and function following wildfire. Scientific Reports 13: 7978-7978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30732-7

Potapov P, Hansen MC, Laestadius L, Turubanova S, Yaroshenko A, Thies C, Smith W, Zhu-ravleva I, Komarova A, Minnemeyer S, Espova E (2017). The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Science Advances 3 (1): 891. doi: 10.1139/b99-176

Potapov P, Zhuravleva I, Yaroshenko A, Evan T, Turubanova S, Thies C, Laestadius L, Stolle F, Aksenov D, Kobaykov K, Esipova E, Glushkov I, Phien S, Silverman J, Danilova I, Egorov A, Fedorov V, Kiselev R, Komarova A, Kostikova A, Manisha A, Margono B, Musin B, Murchie A, Purekhovsky A, Tsybikova E, Vladimirova E, Hajek F, Tetuka B, Turunen O, Yumakaev A, Bras-lavskaya T, Isaev A, Sadownichik T, Smirnov O, Yanitskaya T (2020). World's intact forest landscapes, 2000-2020. The IFL Mapping Team, web site. [online] URL: http://intactforests.org/worl-d.map.html

Pro Silva Helvetica (2016). Portrait de la forêt jardinée "Tscheppe Verda", commune de S-chanf / GR. [Portrait of the "Tscheppe Verda" gardened forest, commune of S-chanf / GR]. Amt fur Wald und Naturgeharen, Pro Silva Helvetica, Zuoz, Switzerland, pp. 19. [in French] [online] URL: http://www.pro-silva-helvetica.ch/pdf/Portrait15_f.pdf

Pro Silva Helvetica (2021). Portrait de la forêt jardinée de l'Envers à Couvet / NE. Harmonie durable entre utilisées et beautée [Portrait of the Envers gardened forest in Couvet / NE. Sustainable harmony between utilities and beauty]. Pro Silva Helvetica, Boudry, Switzerland, pp. 16. [in French] [online] URL: http://www.pro-silva-helvetica.ch/pdf/Portrait01_f.pdf

Provincia Autonoma di Trento (2016). Linee tecniche per la pianificazione forestale aziendale [Technical lines for forest planning]. Servizio foreste e fauna, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento, Italy, pp. 135. - [in Italian] [online] URL: http://forestefauna.provincia.tn.it/content/download/13091/233986/file/linee

Radmanović S, Nikolić N, Dordević A (2018). Humic acids optical properties of Rendzina soils in diverse environmental conditions of Serbia. Archives for Technical Sciences 1: 63-70. doi: 10.7251/afts.2018.1018.063R

Rodriguez A, Perestelo F, Carnicero A, Regalado V, Perez R, De la Fuente G, Falcon MA (1996). Degradation of natural lignins and lignocellulosic substrates by soil-inhabiting fungi imperfecti. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 21: 213-219. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00348.x

Réseau Ecologique Forestier Rhône-Alpes (2016). Refora, parutions, carbone forestiers en movement [Refora, publications, forest carbon in motion]. Réseau Ecologique Forestier Rhône-Alpes, Chambéry, France, web site. [in French] [online] URL: http://refora.online.fr

Saint-André L, Augusto L, Cecillon L, Derrien D (2020). Forest management and soil organic carbon. EU Green Week, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 1-10.

Savilaakso S, Johansson A, Häkkilä M, Uusitalo A, Sandgren T, Mönkkönen M, Puttonen P (2021). What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review. Environmental Evidence 10: 1-1. doi: 10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7

Schütz J-P, Saniga M, Diaci J, Vrška T (2016). Comparing close-to-naturesilviculture with processes in pristine forests: lessons from Central Europe. Annals of Forest Science 73 (4): 911-921. doi: 10.1007/s13595-016-0579-9

Seidel D, Böttger FA (2023). How biomass and other tree architectural characteristics relate to the structural complexity of a beech-pine forest. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 16: 368-376. doi: 10.3832/ifor4305-016160

Silva DC, Oliveira HFM, Zangrandi PL, Domingos FMCB (2022). Flying over Amazonian waters: the role of rivers on the distribution and endemism patterns of neotropical bats. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10: 223. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.774083

Sofo A, Zanella A, Ponge J (2021). Soil quality and fertility in sustainable agriculture, with a contribution to the biological classification of agricultural soils. Soil Use and Management 38 (2): 1085-1112. doi: 10.1111/sum.12702

Springer K, Manning P, Boesing AL, Ammer C, Fiore-Donno AM, Fischer M, Goldmann K, Le Provost G, Overmann J, Ruess L, Schöning I, Siebold S, Sikorski J, Neyret M (2024). Old, deciduous stands support both high biodiversity and carbon storage in German forests. bioRxiv [preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.06.578731
Stephenson NL, Das AJ, Condit R, Russo SE, Bak-er PJ, Beckman NG, Coomes DA, Lines ER, Mor-ris WK, Rüger N, Alvarez E, Blundo C, Bunyave-jchewin S, Chuyong G, Davies SJ, Duque A, Ewango CN, Flores O, Franklin JF, Grau HR, Hao Z, Harmon ME, Hubbell SP, Kenfack D, Lin Y, Makana JR, Malizia A, Malizia LR, Pabst RJ, Pongpattananurak N, Su SH, Sun IF, Tan S, Thomas D, Van Mantgem PJ, Wang X, Wiser SK, Zavala MA (2014). Rate of tree carbon accumu-lation increases continuously with tree size. Na-ture 507: 90-93. - doi: 10.1038/nature12914

Susmel L (1980). Normalizzazione delle foreste Alpine: basi ecosistemiche, equilibrio, modelli colturali, produttività: con applicazione alle foreste del Trentino [Normalization of Alpine forests: ecosystem bases, balance, cultivation models, productivity: with application to the forests of Trentino]. Liviana, Padua, Italy, pp. 437. [in Italian]

Susmel L (1955). Riordinamento su basi bioeco-logiche delle abetine di S. Vito di Cadore [Reor-ganization on bioecological bases of the fir stands of S. Vito di Cadore]. Publication no. 9, Forestry Experimental Station, Florence, Italy, pp. 157. [in Italian]

Susmel L (1956). Leggi di variazione dei parametri della foresta disetanea normale [Laws of variation of the parameters of the normal uneven-aged forest]. L'Italia Forestale e Montana 9 (3): 105-116.

Suzuki M, Umeki K, Orman O, Shibata M, Tanaka H, Iida S, Nakashizuka T, Masaki T (2019). When and why do trees begin to decrease their re-source allocation to apical growth? The impor-tance of the reproductive onset. Oecologia 191: 39-49. - doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04477-y

Szewczyk J, Szwagrzyk J (1996). Tree regenera-tion on rotten wood and on soil in old-growth stand. Vegetatio 122: 37-46. - doi: 10.1007/BF000 52814

Tatti D, Fatton V, Sartori L, Gobat J-M, Le Bayon R-C (2018). What does “lignoform” really mean? Applied Soil Ecology 123: 632-645. - doi: 10.1051/forest:19900208

Thomasius H (1996). Geschichte, Theorie und Praxis des Dauerwaldes [History, theory and practice of permanent forest]. In: Lecture at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the State Forestry Association of Saxony-Anhalt. Garitz, (Dessau, Germany), May 14, 1996. [in German]

Tian T, Reverdy A, She Q, Sun B, Chai Y (2020). The role of rhizodeposits in shaping rhizomicro-biome. Environmental Microbiology Reports 12: 160-172. - doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12816

UPF-BZ (2010). Tipologie forestali dell'Alto Adige - Volume 1: tipi forestali, regioni forestali, chiave dei tipi forestali [Forest typologies of Alto Adige - Volume 1: forest types, forest regions, key to forest types]. Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige, Ripartizione per le foreste, Ufficio Pianificazione forestale, Bolzano, Italy, pp. 312. [in Italian]

Uroz S, Buée M, Deveau A, Mieszkyn S, Martin F (2016). Ecology of the forest microbiome: highlights of temperate and boreal ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 103 (13): 471-488. - doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.09.006

Villarino SH, Pinto P, Jackson RB, Piñeiro G (2021). Plant rhizodeposition: a key factor for soil organic matter formation in stable frac-

tions. Science Advances 7 (16): 547. - doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd3176

Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001). Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchi-cal theory of species diversity. Journal of Bio-geography 28: 453-470. - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-269 9.2001.00563.x

Wikipedia (2024). Old-growth forest. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, web site. [online] URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old-growth_for est

World Resources Institute (2022). Forest pulse: the latest on the world's forests. How much forest was lost in 2022. Global Forest Review, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA, web site. [online] URL: http://research. wri.org/gfr/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends

Xu C, De Frenne P, Blondeel H, De Pauw K, Lan-duyt D, Lorer E, Sanczuk P, Verheyen K, De Lombaerde E (2023). Light more than warming impacts understory tree seedling growth in a temperate deciduous forest. Forest Ecology and Management 549: 121496-121496. - doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121496

Zampedri R (2005). Relazione tra clima, forme di humus e dinamica forestale in ambiente di pec-ceta altimontana [Relationship between cli-mate, humus forms and forest dynamics in an alpine spruce forest environment]. Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Territory and Agro-Forestry Sys-tems (TESAF), University of Padua, Italy, pp. 123. [in Italian]

Zampedri R, Zanella A, Giannini R (2023a). Soil, humipedon and forest management. Forest@-Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 20: 13-19. [in Italian with English abstract] - doi: 10.3832/efor4293-020

Zampedri R, Bernier N, Zanella A, Giannini R, Menta C, Visentin F, Mairota P, Mei G, Zande-giacomo G, Carollo S, Brandolese A, Ponge J-F (2023b). Soil, humipedon, forest life and man-agement. International Journal of Plant Biology 14: 571-593. - doi: 10.3832/efor4293-020

Zanella A (1998). Intorno al concetto di tipologia forestale. Aspettative e realtà [Around the con-cept of forest typology. Expectations and real-ity]. In: Proceedings of the 35th applied course “The typology of forest stations - Example of applied ecology” (Carraro V, Zanella A eds). San Vito di Cadore (Belluno, Italy) 7-11 Sept 1998. University of Padua, Padua, Italy, pp. 185-198.

Zanella A, Tomasi M, Cesare DS, Frizzera L, Jabiol B, Nicolini G, Sartori G, Calabrese MS, Manaca-belli A, Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Maurizio O (2001). Humus Forestali - Manuale di ecologia per il riconoscimento e l'interpretazione - Appli-cazione alle faggete [Forest Humus - Ecology manual for recognition and interpretation - Ap-plication to beech forests]. CEA Ed., Alpine Ecology Centre, Edmund Mach Foundation, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy, pp. 321.

Zanella A, Ascher-Jenull J (2018). Editorial - Hu-musica 1. Applied Soil Ecology 122 (1): 1-9. - doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.029

Zanella A, Ponge J-F, Fritz I, Pietrasiak N, Mate-odo M, Nadporozhskaya M, Juilleret J, Tatti D, Le Bayon R-C, Rothschild L, Mancinelli R (2018). Humusica 2, article 13: para humus sys-tems and forms. Applied Soil Ecology 122: 181- 199. - doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.043

Zanella A, Ponge J-F, Jabiol B, Van Delft B, De Waal R, Katzensteiner K, Kolb E, Bernier N, Mei G, Blouin M, Juilleret J, Pousse N, Stanchi S, Ces-sario F, Le Bayon R-C, Tatti D, Chersich S, Car-ollo L, Englisch M, Schrötter A, Schaufler J, Bonifacio E, Fritz I, Sofo A, Bazot S, Lata J-C, Iffly J-F, Wetzel CE, Hissler C, Fabiani G, Aubert M, Vacca A, Serra G, Menta C, Visentin F, Cools N, Bolzonella C, Frizzera L, Zampedri R, Tomasi M, Galvan P, Charzynski P, Zakharchenko E, Waez-Mousavi SM, Brun J-J, Menardi R, Fontanella F, Zaminato N, Carollo S, Brandolese A, Bertelle M, Zanella G, Bronner T, Graefe U, Hager H (2022). A standardized morpho-func-tional classification of the planet's hu-mipedons. Soil Systems 6: 59. - doi: 10.3390/soilsystems6030059

Zanella A (2024). The spiral of plants and soil in the cycle of life. Italian Botanist 17: 1-11. - doi: 10.3897/italianbotanist.17.107071

Zemp DC, Schleussner C-F, Barbosa HMJ, Van Der Ent RJ, Donges JF, Heinke J, Sampaio G, Rammig A (2014). On the importance of cascad-ing moisture recycling in South America. Atmo-spheric Chemistry and Physics 14 (23): 13337- 13359. - doi: 10.5194/acp-14-13337-2014

Zhouri A (2010). “Adverse forces” in the Brazil-ian Amazon: developmentalism versus environ-mentalism and indigenous rights. The Journal of Environment and Development 19: 252-273. - doi: 10.1177/1070496510378097

Zhou J, Wen Y, Rillig MC, Shi L, Dippold MA, Zeng Z, Kuzyakov Y, Zang H, Jones DL, Blagodat-skaya E (2023). Restricted power: can micro-organisms maintain soil organic matter stability under warming exceeding 2 degrees? Global Ecology and Biogeography. - doi: 10.1111/geb.13 672
## Supplementary Material

**Appendix 1** - The behavior of living beings.

**Appendix 2** - Toumaï and the Anthropocene.

**Appendix 3** - Can humans live far from Earth?

**Appendix 4** - What if “forest ecosystem services” did not exist?

**Appendix 5** - Mirrors. The soil in the mirror.

**Appendix 6** - To feed the plants, feed the soil organisms.

**Appendix 7** - Autopoiesis.

**Appendix 8** - Forest SOC and climate change.

**Fig. S1** - Biodiversity during the Phanerozoic.

**Fig. S2** - Let's see how artificial intelligence can portray things.

**Fig. S3** - Mirrors.

**Fig. S4** - Soil as living cloud of interconnections.

**Fig. S5** - A forest that turns and grows, like a snowball that rotates along a slope, the forest captures the sunlight and recycles all the materials that compose it.

Link: Zanella_4584@suppl001.pdf