*Psychological Science*, **25**, 1289–1290.

Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. *Cognition*, **84**, 221–236.

Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., Evans, A. M., O'Malley, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Social Environment Shapes the Speed of Cooperation. *Scientific Reports*, **6**, 29622.

Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. *Social Neuroscience*, **9**, 94–107.

Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. *Cognitive Psychology*, **80**, 34–72.

Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2014). Base Rates: Both Neglected and Intuitive. *Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, **40**, 544–554.

Royzman, E. B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. *Social Justice Research*, **15**, 165–184.

Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. *Memory & Cognition*, **34**, 619–632.

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. *Psychological Bulletin*, **119**, 3–22.

Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, **102**, 10393–10398.

Stupple, E. J., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings. *Thinking & Reasoning*, **19**, 54–77.

Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences*, **28**, 531–541.

Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. *Cognition*, **119**, 454–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018.

Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Duclos, Y., Coulon, O., Mancini, J., Deruelle, C., . . . Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. *Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience*, **7**, 282–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr008.

Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. *Frontiers in Psychology*, **4**, 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250.

Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. *Thinking & Reasoning*, **20**, 215–244.

Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Koppel, L., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). Intuition and moral decision-making—the effect of time pressure and cognitive load on moral judgment and altruistic behavior. *PLoS ONE*, **11**(10), e0164012.

Trémolière, B., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2014). Efficient Kill-Save Ratios Ease Up the Cognitive Demands on Counterintuitive Moral Utilitarianism. *Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin*, **40**, 923–930.

Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2012). Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. *Cognition*, **124**, 379–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011.

Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2017). Reasoning and moral judgment: A common experimental toolbox. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), *International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning*. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., Verde, M. F., & Morsanyi, K. (2016). Logic Brightens My Day: Evidence for Implicit Sensitivity to Logical Validity. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*. epub ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000248.

Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. *Psychological Science*, **17**, 476–477.

Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*, **14**, 779–804.

Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. *Perspectives on Psychological Science*, **6**, 291–298.
*Psychological Science*, 25, 1289–1290.

Nichols, S. (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. *Cognition*, *84*, 221–236.

Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., Evans, A. M., O'Malley, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Social Environment Shapes the Speed of Cooperation. *Scientific Reports*, *6*, 29622.

Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. *Social Neuroscience*, *9*, 94–107.

Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. *Cognitive Psychology*, *80*, 34–72.

Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2014). Base Rates: Both Neglected and Intuitive. *Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition*, *40*, 544–554.

Royzman, E. B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. *Social Justice Research*, *15*, 165–184.

Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. *Memory & Cognition*, *34*, 619–632.

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. *Psychological Bulletin*, *119*, 3–22.

Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, *102*, 10393–10398.

Stupple, E. J., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings. *Thinking & Reasoning*, *19*, 54–77.

Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences*, *28*, 531–541.

Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. *Cognition*, *119*, 454–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018.

Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Duclos, Y., Coulon, O., Mancini, J., Deruelle, C., . . . Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. *Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience*, *7*, 282–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr008.

Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. *Frontiers in Psychology*, *4*, 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250.

Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. *Thinking & Reasoning*, *20*, 215–244.

Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Koppel, L., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). Intuition and moral decision-making—the effect of time pressure and cognitive load on moral judgment and altruistic behavior. *PLoS ONE*, *11*(10), e0164012.

Trémolière, B., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2014). Efficient Kill-Save Ratios Ease Up the Cognitive Demands on Counterintuitive Moral Utilitarianism. *Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin*, *40*, 923–930.

Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2012). Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. *Cognition*, *124*, 379–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011.

Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2017). Reasoning and moral judgment: A common experimental toolbox. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), *International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning*. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., Verde, M. F., & Morsanyi, K. (2016). Logic Brightens My Day: Evidence for Implicit Sensitivity to Logical Validity. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition*. epub ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000248.

Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. *Psychological Science*, *17*, 476–477.

Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review*, *14*, 779–804.

Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: an empirical comparison using 855 t tests. *Perspectives on Psychological Science*, *6*, 291–298.