# Effects of photoperiod extension on clock gene and neuropeptide RNA expression in the SCN of the Soay sheep

Hugues Dardente, Cathy A. Wyse, Gerald A. Lincoln, Gabriela C. Wagner, David G. Hazlerigg

► To cite this version:

Hugues Dardente, Cathy A. Wyse, Gerald A. Lincoln, Gabriela C. Wagner, David G. Hazlerigg. Effects of photoperiod extension on clock gene and neuropeptide RNA expression in the SCN of the Soay sheep. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11 (7), pp.1-13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159201. hal-01594475

HAL Id: hal-01594475

https://hal.science/hal-01594475v1

Submitted on 26 Sep 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

CrossMark
click for updates

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Dardente H, Wyse CA, Lincoln GA, Wagner GC, Hazlerigg DG (2016) Effects of Photoperiod Extension on Clock Gene and Neuropeptide RNA Expression in the SCN of the Soay Sheep. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159201. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0159201

**Editor:** Eric M Mintz, Kent State University, UNITED STATES

**Received:** April 4, 2016

**Accepted:** June 28, 2016

**Published:** July 26, 2016

**Copyright:** © 2016 Dardente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the paper.

**Funding:** This study was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK grant BB/G004463/1.

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Effects of Photoperiod Extension on Clock Gene and Neuropeptide RNA Expression in the SCN of the Soay Sheep

Hugues Dardente¹,²*, Cathy A. Wyse²,³, Gerald A. Lincoln⁴, Gabriela C. Wagner²,⁵, David G. Hazlerigg²,⁵*

1 PRC, INRA, CNRS, IFCE, Université de Tours, 37380, Nouzilly, France, 2 Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom, 3 Veterinary school, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH, United Kingdom, 4 Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of BioSciences, Fisheries and Economy, University of Tromsø, 9037, Tromsø, Norway

* david.hazlerigg@uit.no (DGH); hdardente@tours.inra.fr (HD)

## Abstract

In mammals, changing daylength (photoperiod) is the main synchronizer of seasonal functions. The photoperiodic information is transmitted through the retino-hypothalamic tract to the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), site of the master circadian clock. To investigate effects of day length change on the sheep SCN, we used *in-situ* hybridization to assess the daily temporal organization of expression of circadian clock genes (*Per1*, *Per2*, *Bmal1* and *Fbxl21*) and neuropeptides (*Vip*, *Grp* and *Avp*) in animals acclimated to a short photoperiod (SP; 8h of light) and at 3 or 15 days following transfer to a long photoperiod (LP3, LP15, respectively; 16h of light), achieved by an acute 8-h delay of lights off. We found that waves of SCN gene expression conformed to those previously seen in LP acclimated animals within 3 days of transfer to LP. Mean levels of expression for *Per1-2* and *Fbxl21* were nearly 2-fold higher in the LP15 than in the SP group. The expression of *Vip* was arrhythmic and unaffected by photoperiod, while, in contrast to rodents, *Grp* expression was not detectable within the sheep SCN. Expression of the circadian output gene *Avp* cycled robustly in all photoperiod groups with no detectable change in phasing. Overall these data suggest that synchronizing effects of light on SCN circadian organisation proceed similarly in ungluates and in rodents, despite differences in neuropeptide gene expression.

## Introduction

Organisms living at temperate latitudes experience profound annual changes in their environment (e.g. temperature, food availability), which exert a strong selective pressure. Therefore, animals have evolved endogenous clocks that allow them to adapt to and, most importantly, anticipate those cyclic changes. Photoperiod, the length of the daily light phase, constitutes the most salient and reliable physical cue and is therefore a major synchronizer of physiology [1,2].
In mammals, the retina is the sole photoreceptive tissue and relays photoperiodic information to the main central circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus.

At the molecular level, circadian clocks revolve around a set of clock genes, which interact to cyclically activate and inhibit their own expression. Specifically, a heterodimer of transcription factors composed of CLOCK and BMAL1 turns on the expression of *Period* 1–3 and *Cryp-tochrome* 1–2 whose proteins then feed-back onto the dimer to switch off transcription. The CLOCK/BMAL1 dimer also directs transcription of genes that do not directly function in the core clock mechanism but add robustness or instill rhythmicity to various intracellular pathways and higher integrative physiological functions [3,4]. Within the SCN, *Arginine Vasopressin* (AVP) is a well-known example of a clock-controlled gene [5]: AVP can act on distant targets through diffusion in the cerebrospinal fluid and synaptically within adjacent regions, such as the paraventricular nuclei, to which the SCN project [6].

In rodents, each of the two bilateral SCN can be considered to comprise two sub-compartments, a ventro-lateral (core) and a dorso-medial (shell). The neuropeptides *Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide* (VIP) and *Gastrin-Releasing Peptide* (GRP) are characteristic of the core while the shell mostly produces AVP. These sub-compartments show functional dichotomy with the core being the main retino-recipient area while the shell is not directly responsive to light and gets photic information from the core (e.g. [7,8,9]). Furthermore, core and shell project to different nuclei, which are, however, mostly localized within the hypothalamus for both compartments (e.g. [7,8,9]). Induction of *Per1-2* genes by a light pulse at night is therefore not homogenous within the SCN and primarily occurs in the core [10–14]. In contrast to the limited projections to extra-SCN regions arising from the core, there is a dense plexus of VIP and GRP fibers within the rodent SCN (e.g. [9]). These observations have led to an integrated model for photic entrainment: light information induces *Per1-2* gene expression in the core SCN, leading to the secretion of VIP/GRP, which in turn transmit the information to the shell whose clock, and outputs, are progressively reset [15,16].

This model implies that core and shell constitute two distinctly functional units that are nevertheless synchronized *in vivo*, a claim supported by numerous studies [17,18–21]. This working model is also backed-up by other lines of evidence. First, both VIP and GRP can evoke phase-shifts in electrical activity in SCN slices *in vitro*, with response curves similar to those observed with light stimulation [22,23]. Second, lack of VIP signalling caused by gene-targeted disruption of either *Vip* or its cognate receptor *Vpac2* leads to an array of disturbed circadian rhythms that range from low amplitude associated with short period length to arrhythmia in the mouse [24–26]. This might result from aberrant gating of light information [27], lending further support for a role of *Vip* in photic entrainment. Since GRP application can restore rhythmicity in VPAC2 knock-out mice [28,29], there appears to be functional redundancy at least in rodents. Third, the profiles of multiple clock genes in the SCN are differentially affected by photoperiod [30,31]. There are also differences in clock gene expression along the rostro-caudal axis of the SCN, pointing to another level of network complexity [32,33].

The rate at which the phase of the SCN clock resets in response to light is important since it conditions the resetting speed of other body clocks, a hierarchical organization responsible for normal control of circadian physiology and behaviour. Rapid shifts in photoperiodic phasing have cascading effects on this circadian organisation starting with effects on SCN function and then extending to the peripheral body clocks. Transient periods of desynchrony within this cascade are believed to account for most of the inconveniences experienced during jet-lag or shift-work [34,35]. In nocturnal rodent models progressive resynchronisation following shifts in photoperiod have been reported both at the level of the SCN and the level of phasing between different peripheral organs and this master pacemaker [4,15,16].
Data on SCN organisation and light resetting are much more limited for other mammalian groups. In the sheep (the most studied ungulate species), rhythmic patterns of clock gene expression following acclimation to different photoperiods are similar to those seen in rodents [36]. Contrastingly the boundaries between shell and core regions of neuropeptide expression are much less sharply defined than in rodents [37], and although both *Avp* and *Vip* are expressed within the sheep SCN [37,38] their temporal patterns of expression have not been reported.

To determine whether comparative differences in organisation are associated with differ-
ences in photoperiodic responsiveness, we compared SCN gene expression in Soay sheep sub-
jected to an acute 8-h delay in lights off. Previously, we have used this photoperiodic switch
protocol to explore seasonal neuroendocrine responses, and have assayed it effects on locomo-
tor activity, melatonin secretion and *pars tuberalis* gene expression rhythms [39–41]. These
studies demonstrate that while melatonin profiles shift almost immediately, reflecting a strong
masking component [40], locomotor activity and *pars tuberalis* gene expression resynchronises
in 1 to 2 weeks following the light switch [40,41]. In the present study, our endpoints were
daily expression profiles of the clock genes *Per1-2*, *Bmal1* and *Fbxl21* and the neuropeptides
*Avp*, *Vip* and *Grp*. Our study reveals that mRNA profiles for *Per1-2* genes respond rapidly over
a 15 day period following this photoperiodic switch, paralleling previously described effects on
behavioural shifting. In contrast, no effect of the photoperiodic switch was observed on *Vip*
and *Avp* RNA expression profiles, while *Grp* was not detected in the sheep SCN. We conclude
that SCN-level photoperiodic acclimation proceeds similarly in ungulates and rodents.

**Materials and Methods**

Cloning & constructs

RNA extraction was performed using Tri-reagent (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and cDNA synthesis was carried out using a reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). PCR was done with Platinum Taq Hifi (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Con-structs used to prepare templates for in-situ hybridization were generated as follows: following agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR fragments of the expected sizes were extracted using a gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and cloned in pGEM-T easy vector (Promega); four to six positive clones were sequenced (MWG, United Kingdom), and the sequences deposited in GenBank (see below).

Animals

The animals used for this study are the same as those of a previously published paper [39]. Ani-
mal experiments were conducted in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures)
act of 1986 and approved by University of Edinburgh Local Ethics Committee. Fifty-four Soay
ewes were brought indoors in January and acclimatised to a 8:16 h light/dark cycle (SP) for 6
weeks. A first group of 18 (SP group) was killed throughout the day at four hour intervals
(n = 3 per time point) starting at ZT0 (lights on) while the remaining 36 animals were switched
to a 16:8 h light/dark cycle (LP) by an 8-h extension of the light phase commencing 8 h after
lights on. The day on which the photoperiodic switch was applied was designated ‘day 0’. Ani-
mals were then culled as described for the SP condition (every 4h, n = 3 per time point) on
days +3 (LP3 group) and +15 (LP15 group) relative to day 0. All animals were killed by an
overdose of barbiturate (Euthatal; Rhone Merieux, Essex, UK) administered intravenously. For
animals killed in the dark, including those at ZT0 dim red light was used and eyes were covered
with opaque plastic sheet until the head had been removed for brain dissection. Hypothalami
with pituitary attached were frozen in isopentane cooled over dry ice prior to storage at -80°C.
*In-situ* hybridisation and quantification of signal

Hypothalamic blocks for *in situ* hybridisation were cut into 20 µm sections using a cryostat, and thaw-mounted onto polylysine and gelatin coated slides. Radioactive cRNA riboprobes were prepared by plasmid linearisation and *in vitro* transcription reactions including ³⁵S-UTP (Perkin-Elmer). Sections were hybridized overnight at 60°C with 5 x 10⁵ cpm of probe per slide, subjected to RNase-A digestion and stringency washes in sodium citrate buffer to remove non-specific probe hybridisation. Slides were then dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions and exposed to an autoradiographic film (Kodak). Exposure duration was optimized for each gene by repeat film exposures, depending on labeling intensity. Films were scanned on a 1640XL transmittance scanner (EpsonUK, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK) along with a calibrated optical density (OD) transmission step wedge (Stouffer, USA). Calibrated Integrated OD measurements of gene expression in the SCN were performed using ImageJ software. Homologous probes used in this paper correspond to the following nucleotide position of Gen-Bank accession numbers: Avp nt 1–501 of NM_001126341, Vip nt 1–513 of NM_001126368, Grp nt 48–545 of NM_001009321, Per1 nt 1–456 of EF683160, Per2 nt 1–451 of EF583558, Bmal1 nt 1–836 of NM_001129734, Fbxl21 nt 342–709 of NM_001129738.

Statistical analysis

Data (mean ± SEM) are plotted with respect to zeitgeber time (ZT) where ZT0 = lights on.
Data were analysed by ANOVA to test for main effects of photoperiod and ZT as well as photo-
period x ZT interaction. Post-hoc comparisons were made using Tukey test, conducted using
GraphPad Prism 6 (La Jolla, USA) with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Where ANOVA
revealed significant effects of ZT, phase was estimated by calculation of circular centre of grav-
ity (CoG) and circular standard deviation using CircWave (http://www.euclock.org/results/
item/circ-wave.html).

Results

SCN expression of circadian clock genes

SCN labelling for the clock genes *Per1*, *Per2*, *Fbxl21* and *Bmal1* is shown in Fig 1.

Prior to the photoperiodic switch, the SCN expression rhythms of the clock genes *Per1* and *Per2* were similar to those described previously in SP acclimated sheep [36], peaking in the early and late light phase respectively (p < 0.001 for overall effect of ZT). Moreover, the expression profiles of each of these three genes changed significantly in the 15 days following the PP switch (p values for photoperiod x ZT interaction: *Per1*/*Per2* –p < 0.0001, *Fxbl21* –p = 0.012).

Under SP, *Per1* expression was maximal during the early day (CoG = ZT1.47 ± 2.83), after which levels steadily decreased to reach a nadir during the mid-dark phase (ZT16). The photoperiodic switch led to clear delay in phasing relative to lights on within 3 days, with maximal levels observed at ZT8 (CoG = ZT7.53 ± 2.18) and a trough during the mid-dark phase, similar to the SP condition. There was no further shift in phasing after 15 days (CoG = ZT7.57 ± 2.31). In addition, compared to the SP condition, daily mean *Per1* levels were increased by about 20% at LP3 and nearly doubled at LP15 (p < 0.001 for overall effect of photoperiod). This difference was attributable to maximal recorded levels of expression increasing under LP, so that by LP15 they were more than 2-fold higher than in SP animals, and to an increased duration of elevated expression relative to the night-time nadir. The ZT20 nadir was not significantly different for the 3 photoperiod groups.

Under SP, the highest *Per2* mRNA levels were observed at ZT8 (CoG = ZT6.65 ± 2.26). The LP transfer broadened the peak of expression with maximal levels observed at ZT8-ZT12 in the
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 1.** Effects of an 8-h delay in lights off on clock gene expression in the sheep SCN. Left panels show graphs of densitometric analysis for each of the four genes investigated, arranged in order of estimated time of peak expression (*Per1*<*Per2*<*Fbxl21*<*Bmal1*). Data are mean ± SEM of n = 3 animals / ZT point. p values in each graph refer to the F statistic for photoperiod x ZT interaction. The solid horizontal bars indicate the period of the dark phase in SP control animals, and in LP animals following the delay in lights off (horizontal arrow). Right panels show images of minimal and maximal expression for each gene, with phases from which these images were taken. Scale bar = 4 mm.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159201.g001
LP3 group (CoG ZT11.3 ± 1.68) and ZT12-ZT16 in the LP15 group (CoG ZT12.17 ± 1.96), thereby completing an approximately 6-h phase delay in peak levels. Similar to *Per1*, daily mean levels of *Per2* mRNA in LP3 and LP15 groups were enhanced by ~60% and ~100% compared to the SP group ($p < 0.001$ for overall effect of photoperiod), and again this was due to higher peak levels of expression and a longer period of elevated expression relative to invariant ZT20 nadir levels.

Under SP, *Fbxl21* expression showed a complex waveform with a primary peak at ZT8-12 and a clear secondary peak around ZT0, giving an overall CoG of ZT8.48 ± 3.08. Following transfer to LP the principal mid-light phase peak became progressively delayed (LP3 CoG 9.95 ± 2.66; LP15 CoG ZT11.55 ± 2.84). Daily mean levels were increased by 40% and 80% in the LP3 and LP15 groups, respectively ($p < 0.001$ for overall effect of photoperiod). As for the *Per1-2* genes, this effect was due to an extension of the period when expression was above nadir levels, and to an increase in maximal levels of expression.

Contrasting to these effects for clock genes peaking in the light phase, the dark-expressed gene *Bmal1* responded less dramatically to the photoperiodic switch ($p < 0.05$ for Photoperiod x ZT interaction). Consistent with previous data [36], *Bmal1* expression peaked in the early to mid dark phase in SP acclimated sheep (CoG ZT14.32 ± 2.79), and declined to a pronounced nadir in the early light phase when expression levels were some 7-fold lower ($p < 0.001$ by one way ANOVA). This rhythmicity was dampened by the switch to LP, with no significant effect of ZT in either the LP3 or LP15 groups. There was no significant effect of photoperiod treatment on overall cycle mean levels of expression.

## Neuropeptide gene expression in the sheep SCN

Representative images of autoradiograms for neuropeptide gene expression in the ovine SCN are shown in Fig 2.

The expression of *Avp* within the ovine SCN was dependent on time of day ($p < 0.05$ for effect of sampling time, ZT), but showed no significant change in waveform over the 15 days following the delay in lights off (photoperiod x ZT interaction, *p* = 0.93) (CoG estimates ranged from ZT14.49 ± 3.09 (SP) to ZT13.72 ± 3.1 (LP15)). In addition, no effect on overall cycle mean levels of expression was observed following the photoperiod switch (*p* = 0.78).

The expression of *Vip* was not affected by either time of day or photoperiod (two-way ANOVA; *p* = 0.78 and *p* = 0.87, respectively).

Finally, no labelling was found within the SCN for *Grp* in any of the animals, albeit high levels of expression were obvious in the hypothalamic supraoptic nuclei, paraventricular nuclei and the periventricular area.

## Discussion

Light synchronisation of the SCN circadian clock depends on direct retinal input. Due to their acute and phase-dependent light-responsiveness within the SCN [42–44], it is thought that *Per1* and *Per2* are key components of the photic entrainment pathway [45–47]. Light triggers glutamate and PACAP secretion within the SCN and both transmitters can evoke *Per1-2* gene induction and phase-shift the clock [48,49]. A classical intracellular signalling cascade involving cAMP and P-CREB appears to be responsible for the induction of *Per1-2* through cAMP Responsive Elements located within the promoter of these genes [50–52]. Our data are consistent with the view that *Per1* and *Per2* are light-inducible within the sheep SCN: The distribution of labelling for these genes overlaps with the retino-recipient zone of the sheep SCN as mapped by Tessoneaud et al [37], and both their level of expression and phase are rapidly shifted following the photoperiod extension. Indeed, when we compare the phases of peak
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 2. Neuropeptide gene expression in the sheep SCN.** The left panel shows daily mRNA expression profiles for the neuropeptides *Avp* and *Vip*. *Avp* shows a pronounced daily rhythm of expression, but this was unaffected by the photoperiod manipulation. *Vip* expression shows no significant changes during the daily cycle, or in response to photoperiod manipulation. Data presentation in the graphs is as in Fig 1. The right panels show representative images for each of the 3 neuropeptide genes studied, with phases from which images were taken. Note the absence of *Grp* expression in the SCN despite strong labelling in the neighbouring supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei. Scale bar = 4 mm.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159201.g002

period gene expression at LP3, with those reported in an earlier comparison of SP and LP acclimated Soay sheep [36], we can see that phase readjustment is already largely complete.

Additionally, in the present study we found that *Per1-2* gene expression profiles under LP3 and LP15 showed an increase in 24-h cycle mean levels of expression. This effect was not observed in the previous analysis of expression profiles in SP and LP acclimated Soay sheep [36]. Although we cannot exclude that this is a transient effect provoked by the photoperiod extension, it is also possible that the previous study in sheep underestimated effects on maximal levels of expression for technical reasons. We therefore favour the view that extended light exposure on the light-inducible elements of the SCN clockwork leads to heightened cycle mean levels of *Per1-2* gene expression. This explanation probably also accounts for the LP-induced doubling of 24-h cycle mean expression for *Fbxl21* observed in the present study.

In contrast to *Per1/Per2* and *Fbxl21*, exposure to LP blunted the peak to trough amplitude of the *Bmal1* daily rhythm. Such changes in daily amplitude of clock gene expression were not observed between SP-adapted vs LP-adapted sheep [36]. Indeed, although photoperiodic differences in phasing and duration of clock gene expression are consistently observed within the
SCN of multiple rodents [31,32,53–56], no consistent systematic changes in the amplitude of RNA expression rhythms between SP and LP have emerged. Electrophysiological studies concur with this finding since photoperiod encoding has primarily been assigned to differences in the relative phase distribution between neurons, without modifications in the amplitude of rhythms in individual neurons [57–59].

*Avp* and *Vip* were both readily detected within the sheep SCN. The sheep differs from rodents, in that clear boundaries between core and shell SCN sub-compartments are not obvious, with *Avp* and *Vip* cells intermingled [37]. Closer examination of our autoradiograms confirmed this; although *Avp* and *Vip in-situ* hybridizations were performed on alternate sections it was not possible to assign expression to spatially distinct sub-regions. Investigation of retinal projections nevertheless suggests a certain level of compartmentalization [60].

AVP has been implicated as an output of the clock [5,61]. The mRNA profile of *Avp* is strongly rhythmic and the highest levels are found during the early night under SP and late light phase in LP3/LP15 groups. This rhythmic profile of expression is in broad agreement with what has been reported in many species, be they nocturnal or diurnal (references in [62]). This rhythm of *Avp* transcription within the SCN most likely accounts for the daily rhythm of vasopressin in cerebrospinal fluid reported in sheep [63], akin to what had been initially demonstrated by Schwartz and Reppert in rats [64]. But somewhat surprisingly the *Avp* rhythm was not modified in the course of the photoperiodic transfer. This contrasts with the situation in rodents, which typically show an increase in duration of *Avp* mRNA peak levels under LP compared to SP [32,55,56]. Since our previous studies [41,65] indicate that behavioural shifting occurs within the first week following a photoperiodic switch, we do not think the result reported here reflects incomplete re-entrainment at the SCN level. Rather, the reasons for this apparent difference may relate to the technical limitations of the radioactive *in situ* hybridisation approach, where clear spatial compartmentalisation of the SCN is lacking, or they may reflect differences in the functional role of AVP as a circadian SCN output in ungulates.

The mRNA profiles of *Vip* in the sheep SCN were neither rhythmic nor significantly different between SP and LP3/LP15. Large inter-specific differences in *Vip* expression and discrepancies in the effect of light have been reported: in rat, *Vip* mRNA and protein exhibit clear daily rhythms with high levels during the night and decreasing levels concomitant with light-on (references in [62]); contrastingly, *Vip* mRNA is not rhythmic in the golden hamster [66], only a weak oscillation is observed in the Siberian hamster [67] and no variations of immunoreactivity are found within the human SCN [68]. Likewise, no large variations in mRNA levels are found in the mouse or the diurnal rodents *Arvicanthis ansorgei* and *Arvicanthis niloticus* exposed to a light-dark cycle [62,69]. These differences suggest that rhythmic *Vip* expression is not a prerequisite for SCN function across mammals.

Interestingly, we did not detect *Grp* mRNA within the ovine SCN. This might be relevant since *Grp*-expressing cells of the rodent SCN are the primary cell type in which *Per1* induction is observed after a light pulse, and are a likely gate for photic entrainment of the shell [12,14,69,70–74]. We cannot exclude the possibility that *Grp* is expressed within the sheep SCN, but at levels below the detection threshold of our *in situ* hybridization protocol. Indeed, the use of *in situ* hybridization to detect *Grp* expression within the SCN of rodents has consistently shown that levels are lower than those for *Avp* or *Vip* [12,75]. Another consistent observation across rodents is the limited rostro-caudal extent of *Grp* expression within the SCN, with neurons being found only in the mid-caudal SCN [12,14,69,71–74]. Therefore it might be that *Grp*-expressing neurons were not present in any of the sections we examined (3 sections per animal, total of 54 animals), because slides were taken in regions too rostral. However, considering that (i) we detected *Vip* in all sections and (ii) *Vip* and *Grp* expressing cells overlap in rodents, with some cells actually co-expressing both neuropeptides [14], we do not think this is
the most likely explanation. Bearing in mind these plausible limitations, inherent to our techni-
cal approach, strong *Grp* expression was obvious in the supra-optic and paraventricular nuclei
and in periventricular regions, areas devoid of *Grp* labeling in rodents to the best of our knowl-
edge. Therefore, it would seem that GRP may play distinct roles in the hypothalamus of sheep
and rodents.

In conclusion, the present study indicates that phase-shifting of the sheep SCN molecular
clock during a long-day transfer is achieved rapidly, over the first 15 days of LP exposure. We
notice that cycle mean levels of expression were increased in the course of the LP transfer for
*Per1*, *Per2* and *Fbxl21* due to effects on peak expression levels, and on duration of the period
when expression was above nadir levels. This was not seen for *Bmal1*, indicating that this effect
is gene-specific. We found that although expression of *Avp* was rhythmic, photoperiodic trans-
fer did not lead to an overt change in phase. Finally, the expression of *Vip* was not rhythmic in
any of the three groups and *Grp* does not appear to be expressed in the SCN of the sheep. Over-
all our data suggest that the mechanisms of photoperiodic synchronisation at the SCN level are
broadly similar between ungulates and rodents, with however some differences in neuropeptide
signalling.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff at the Marshall Building for expert care of the animals, Mr Mike Birnie for excellent laboratory technical support and Dr Roelof Hut for statistical advice.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HD GAL DGH. Performed the experiments: HD GAL DGH. Analyzed the data: HD CW GW DGH. Wrote the paper: HD CW GAL GW DGH.

**References**

1. Dardente H. Melatonin-dependent timing of seasonal reproduction by the pars tuberalis: Pivotal roles for long daylengths and thyroid hormones. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012; 24: 249–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02250.x PMID: 22070540

2. Hazlerigg DG, Simonneaux V. Seasonal regulation of reproduction in mammals. Knobil and Neill's Physiology of Reproduction (Fourth Edition). 2015; 1575-1604.

3. Dibner C, Schibler U, Albrecht U. The mammalian circadian timing system: Organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010; 72: 517-549. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821 PMID: 20148687

4. Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 445-462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128 PMID: 22483041

5. Jin X, Shearman LP, Weaver DR, Zylka MJ, de Vries GJ, Reppert SM. A molecular mechanism regulating rhythmic output from the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Cell. 1999; 96: 57-68. PMID: 9989497

6. Kalsbeek A, Fliers E, Hofman MA, Swaab DF, Buijs RM. Vasopressin and the output of the hypothalamic biological clock. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010; 22: 362–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.01956.x PMID: 20088910

7. Kalsbeek A, Teclemariam-Mesbah R, Pevet P. Efferent projections of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the golden hamster (*Mesocricetus auratus*). J Comp Neurol. 1993; 332: 293-314. PMID: 8331217

8. Van der Beek EM, Horvath TL, Wiegant VM, Van den Hurk R, Buijs RM. Evidence for a direct neuronal pathway from the suprachiasmatic nucleus to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone system: Combined tracing and light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical studies. J Comp Neurol. 1997; 384: 569-579. PMID: 9259490

9. Abrahamson EE, Moore RY. Suprachiasmatic nucleus in the mouse: Retinal innervation, intrinsic organization and efferent projections. Brain Res. 2001; 916: 172-191. PMID: 11597605

10. Yan L, Takekida S, Shigeyoshi Y, Okamura H. Per1 and Per2 gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: Circadian profile and the compartment-specific response to light. Neuroscience. 1999; 94: 141-150. PMID: 10613504
11. Hamada T, LeSauter J, Venuti JM, Silver R. Expression of period genes: Rhythmic and nonrhythmic compartments of the suprachiasmatic nucleus pacemaker. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: 7742-7750. PMID: 11567064

12. Dardente H, Poirel VJ, Klosen P, Pevet P, Masson-Pevet M. Per and neuropeptide expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei: Compartmentalization and differential cellular induction by light. Brain Res. 2002; 958: 261-271. PMID: 12470861

13. Yan L, Okamura H. Gradients in the circadian expression of Per1 and Per2 genes in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. 2002; 15: 1153-1162. PMID: 11982626

14. Kawamoto K, Nagano M, Kanda F, Chihara K, Shigeyoshi Y, Okamura H. Two types of VIP neuronal components in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci Res. 2003; 74: 852-857. PMID: 14648589

15. Yamazaki S, Numano R, Abe M, Hida A, Takahashi R, Ueda M, et al. Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats. Science. 2000; 288: 682-685. PMID: 10784453

16. Nagano M, Adachi A, Nakahama K, Nakamura T, Tamada M, Meyer-Bernstein E, et al. An abrupt shift in the day/night cycle causes desynchrony in the mammalian circadian center. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 6141-6151. PMID: 12853433

17. Albus H, Vansteensel MJ, Michel S, Block GD, Meijer JH. A GABAergic mechanism is necessary for coupling dissociable ventral and dorsal regional oscillators within the circadian clock. Curr Biol. 2005; 15: 886-893. PMID: 15916945

18. Shinohara K, Honma S, Katsuno Y, Abe H, Honma K. Circadian rhythms in the release of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and arginine-vasopressin in organotypic slice culture of rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neurosci Lett. 1994; 170: 183-186. PMID: 8041503

19. Yamaguchi S, Isejima H, Matsuo T, Okura R, Yagita K, Kobayashi M, et al. Synchronization of cellular clocks in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Science. 2003; 302: 1408-1412. PMID: 14631044

20. de la Iglesia HO, Cambras T, Schwartz WJ, Diez-Noguera A. Forced desynchronization of dual circadian oscillators within the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Curr Biol. 2004; 14: 796-800. PMID: 15120072

21. Buhr ED, Yoo SH, Takahashi JS. Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science. 2010; 330: 379-385. doi: 10.1126/science.1195262 PMID: 20947768

22. Albers HE, Liou SY, Stopa EG, Zoeller RT. Interaction of colocalized neuropeptides: Functional significance in the circadian timing system. J Neurosci. 1991; 11: 846-851. PMID: 2002363

23. Reed HE, Meyer-Spasche A, Cutler DJ, Coen CW, Piggins HD. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) phase-shifts the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus clock in vitro. Eur J Neurosci. 2001; 13: 839-843. PMID: 11207820

24. Harmar AJ, Marston HM, Shen S, Spratt C, West KM, Sheward WJ, et al. The VPAC(2) receptor is essential for circadian function in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei. Cell. 2002; 109: 497-508. PMID: 12086606

25. Colwell CS, Michel S, Itri J, Rodriguez W, Tam J, Lelievre V, et al. Disrupted circadian rhythms in VIP- and PHI-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 285: R939-49. PMID: 12855416

26. Aton SJ, Colwell CS, Harmar AJ, Waschek J, Herzog ED. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediates circadian rhythmicity and synchrony in mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8: 476-483. PMID: 15750589

27. Hughes AT, Fahey B, Cutler DJ, Coogan AN, Piggins HD. Aberrant gating of photic input to the supra-chiasmatic circadian pacemaker of mice lacking the VPAC2 receptor. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 3522-3526. PMID: 15071099

28. Maywood ES, Reddy AB, Wong GK, O'Neill JS, O'Brien JA, McMahon DG, et al. Synchronization and maintenance of timekeeping in suprachiasmatic circadian clock cells by neuropeptidergic signaling. Curr Biol. 2006; 16: 599-605. PMID: 16546085

29. Brown TM, Hughes AT, Piggins HD. Gastrin-releasing peptide promotes suprachiasmatic nuclei cellular rhythmicity in the absence of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-VPAC2 receptor signaling. J Neurosci. 2005; 25: 11155-11164. PMID: 16319315

30. Messenger S, Ross AW, Barrett P, Morgan PJ. Decoding photoperiodic time through Per1 and ICER gene amplitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 9938-9943. PMID: 10449798

31. Tournier BB, Menet JS, Dardente H, Poirel VJ, Malan A, Masson-Pevet M, et al. Photoperiod differentially regulates clock genes' expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of syrian hamster. Neuroscience. 2003; 118: 317-322. PMID: 12699768

32. Hazlerigg DG, Ebling FJ, Johnston JD. Photoperiod differentially regulates gene expression rhythms in the rostral and caudal SCN. Curr Biol. 2005; 15: R449-50. PMID: 15964261
33. Evans JA, Leise TL, Castanon-Cervantes O, Davidson AJ. Dynamic interactions mediated by nonre-dundant signaling mechanisms couple circadian clock neurons. Neuron. 2013; 80: 973-983. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.022 PMID: 24267653

34. Hastings MH, Reddy AB, Maywood ES. A clockwork web: Circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4: 649-661. PMID: 12894240

35. Levi F, Schibler U. Circadian rhythms: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007; 47: 593-628. PMID: 17209800

36. Lincoln G, Messager S, Andersson H, Hazlerigg D. Temporal expression of seven clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the pars tuberalis of the sheep: Evidence for an internal coincidence timer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 13890-13895. PMID: 12374857

37. Tessonneaud A, Cooper HM, Caldani M, Locatelli A, Viguier-Martinez MC. The suprachiasmatic nucleus in the sheep: Retinal projections and cytoarchitectural organization. Cell Tissue Res. 1994; 278: 65-84. PMID: 7954705

38. Tessonneaud A, Bonnefond C, Monnerie R, Viguier-Martinez MC. Distribution of arginine-vasopressin and vasoactive intestinal peptide messenger RNA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the sheep. Neurosci Lett. 1995; 191: 5-8. PMID: 7659289

39. Dardente H, Wyse CA, Birnie MJ, Dupre SM, Loudon AS, Lincoln GA, et al. A molecular switch for photoperiod responsiveness in mammals. Curr Biol. 2010; 20: 2193-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.048 PMID: 21129971

40. Hazlerigg DG, Andersson H, Johnston JD, Lincoln G. Molecular characterization of the long-day response in the soay sheep, a seasonal mammal. Curr Biol. 2004; 14: 334-339. PMID: 14972686

41. Lincoln GA, Johnston JD, Andersson H, Wagner G, Hazlerigg DG. Photorefractoriness in mammals: Dissociating a seasonal timer from the circadian-based photoperiod response. Endocrinology. 2005; 146: 3782-3790. PMID: 15919753

42. Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Eichele G, Lee CC. A differential response of two putative mammalian circadian regulators, mper1 and mper2, to light. Cell. 1997; 91: 1055-1064. PMID: 9428527

43. Shearman LP, Zylka MJ, Weaver DR, Kolakowski LF Jr, Reppert SM. Two period homologs: Circadian expression and photic regulation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Neuron. 1997; 19: 1261-1269. PMID: 9427249

44. Miyake S, Sumi Y, Yan L, Takekida S, Fukuyama T, Ishida Y, et al. Phase-dependent responses of Per1 and Per2 genes to a light-stimulus in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 2000; 294: 41-44. PMID: 11044582

45. Shigeyoshi Y, Taguchi K, Yamamoto S, Takekida S, Yan L, Tei H, et al. Light-induced resetting of a mammalian circadian clock is associated with rapid induction of the mPer1 transcript. Cell. 1997; 91: 1043-1053. PMID: 9428526

46. Akiyama M, Kouzu Y, Takahashi S, Wakamatsu H, Moriya T, Maetani M, et al. Inhibition of light- or glutamate-induced mPer1 expression represses the phase shifts into the mouse circadian locomotor and suprachiasmatic firing rhythms. J Neurosci. 1999; 19: 1115-1121. PMID: 9920673

47. Moriya T, Horikawa K, Akiyama M, Shibata S. Correlative association between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated expression of period genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and phase shifts in behavior with photic entrainment of clock in hamsters. Mol Pharmacol. 2000; 58: 1554-1562. PMID: 11093796

48. Asai M, Yamaguchi S, Isejima H, Jonouchi M, Moriya T, Shibata S, et al. Visualization of mPer1 transcription in vitro: NMDA induces a rapid phase shift of mPer1 gene in cultured SCN. Curr Biol. 2001; 11: 1524-1527. PMID: 11591320

49. Nielsen HS, Hannibal J, Knudsen SM, Fahrenkrug J. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide induces period1 and period2 gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus during late night. Neuroscience. 2001; 103: 433-441. PMID: 11246158

50. Travnickova-Bendova Z, Cermakian N, Reppert SM, Sassone-Corsi P. Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 7728-7733. PMID: 12032351

51. Gau D, Lemberger T, von Gall C, Kretz O, Le Minh N, Gass P, et al. Phosphorylation of CREB Ser142 regulates light-induced phase shifts of the circadian clock. Neuron. 2002; 34: 245-253. PMID: 11970866

52. Tischkau SA, Mitchell JW, Tyan SH, Buchanan GF, Gillette MU. Ca2+/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-dependent activation of Per1 is required for light-induced signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian clock. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 718-723. PMID: 12409294
53. Sumova A, Jac M, Sladek M, Sauman I, Illnerova H. Clock gene daily profiles and their phase relationship in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus are affected by photoperiod. J Biol Rhythms. 2003; 18: 134-144. PMID: 12693868

54. Nuesslein-Hildesheim B, O'Brien JA, Ebling FJ, Maywood ES, Hastings MH. The circadian cycle of mPER clock gene products in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the siberian hamster encodes both daily and seasonal time. Eur J Neurosci. 2000; 12: 2856-2864. PMID: 10971628

55. Johnston JD, Ebling FJ, Hazlerigg DG. Photoperiod regulates multiple gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of the siberian hamster (*Phodopus sungorus*). Eur J Neurosci. 2005; 21: 2967-2974. PMID: 15978008

56. Tournier BB, Dardente H, Simonneaux V, Vivien-Roels B, Pevet P, Masson-Pevet M, et al. Seasonal variations of clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and pars tuberalis of the european hamster (*Cricetus cricetus*). Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 25: 1529-1536. PMID: 17425579

57. Schaap J, Albus H, VanderLeest HT, Eilers PH, Detari L, Meijer JH. Heterogeneity of rhythmic suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: Implications for circadian waveform and photoperiodic encoding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 15994-15999. PMID: 14671328

58. VanderLeest HT, Houben T, Michel S, Deboer T, Albus H, Vansteensel MJ, et al. Seasonal encoding by the circadian pacemaker of the SCN. Curr Biol. 2007; 17: 468-473. PMID: 17320387

59. Brown TM, Piggins HD. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the electrical activity of suprachiasmatic nuclei neurons and their response to photoperiod. J Biol Rhythms. 2009; 24: 44-54. PMID: 19227579

60. Torrealba F, Parraguez VH, Reyes T, Valenzuela G, Seron-Ferre M. Prenatal development of the retinohypothalamic pathway and the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the sheep. J Comp Neurol. 1993; 338: 304-316. PMID: 8308174

61. Buijs RM, Kalsbeek A. Hypothalamic integration of central and peripheral clocks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2: 521-526. PMID: 11433377

62. Dardente H, Menet JS, Challet E, Tournier BB, Pevet P, Masson-Pevet M. Daily and circadian expression of neuropeptides in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of nocturnal and diurnal rodents. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004; 124: 143-151. PMID: 15135222

63. Stark RI, Daniel SS. Circadian rhythm of vasopressin levels in cerebrospinal fluid of the fetus: effect of continuous light. Endocrinology. 1989; 124: 3095-3101. PMID: 2721460

64. Schwartz WJ, Reppert SM. Neural regulation of the circadian rhythm of vasopressin in cerebrospinal fluid: a pre-eminent role for the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J Neurosci. 1985; 5: 2771-2778. PMID: 4045552

65. Wagner GC, Johnston JD, Clarke IJ, Lincoln GA, Hazlerigg DG. Redefining the limits of day length responsiveness in a seasonal mammal. Endocrinology. 2008; 149: 32-39. PMID: 17901234

66. Duncan MJ, Herron JM, Hill SA. Aging selectively suppresses vasoactive intestinal peptide messenger RNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the syrian hamster. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001; 87: 196-203. PMID: 11245922

67. Duncan MJ, Cheng X, Heller KS. Photoperiodic exposure and time of day modulate the expression of arginine vasopressin mRNA and vasoactive intestinal peptide mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of siberian hamsters. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1995; 32: 181-186. PMID: 7500829

68. Hofman MA, Zhou JN, Swaab DF. No evidence for a diurnal vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) rhythm in the human suprachiasmatic nucleus. Brain Res. 1996; 722: 78-82. PMID: 8813352

69. Mahoney MM, Ramanathan C, Hagenauer MH, Thompson RC, Smale L, Lee T. Daily rhythms and sex differences in vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, VIPR2 receptor and arginine vasopressin mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal rodent, *Arvicanthis niloticus*. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 30: 1537-1543. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06936.x PMID: 19811536

70. Antle MC, Kriegsfeld LJ, Silver R. Signaling within the master clock of the brain: Localized activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by gastrin-releasing peptide. J Neurosci. 2005; 25: 2447-2454. PMID: 15758152

71. Aida R, Moriya T, Araki M, Akiyama M, Wada K, Wada E, et al. Gastrin-releasing peptide mediates phasic entrainable signals to dorsal subsets of suprachiasmatic nucleus via induction of period gene in mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2002; 61: 26-34. PMID: 11752203

72. Karatsoreos IN, Yan L, LeSauter J, Silver R. Phenotype matters: Identification of light-responsive cells in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 68-75. PMID: 14715939

73. Guillaumond F, Becquet D, Blanchard MP, Attia J, Moreno M, Bosler O, et al. Nocturnal expression of phosphorylated-ERK1/2 in gastrin-releasing peptide neurons of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurochem. 2007; 101: 1224-1235. PMID: 17250649
74. Gamble KL, Allen GC, Zhou T, McMahon DG. Gastrin-releasing peptide mediates light-like resetting of the suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian pacemaker through cAMP response element-binding protein and Per1 activation. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 12078-12087. PMID: 17978049

75. Dardente H, Klosen P, Caldelas I, Pevet P, Masson-Pevet M. Phenotype of Per1- and Per2-expressing neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal rodent (*Arvicanthis ansorgei*): Comparison with a nocturnal species, the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 2002; 310: 85-92. PMID: 12242487