# Nematic vs lamellar order in colloidal aqueous suspensions of nanosheets

Jean-Christophe P. Gabriel, Christophe Penisson, Patrick Davidson

► To cite this version:

Jean-Christophe P. Gabriel, Christophe Penisson, Patrick Davidson. Nematic vs lamellar order in colloidal aqueous suspensions of nanosheets. 16th Conference of the International Association of Colloid and Interface Scientists, International Association of Colloid and Interface Scientists, May 2018, Rotterdam (NL), Netherlands. hal-04735116

HAL Id: hal-04735116

https://hal.science/hal-04735116v1

Submitted on 14 Oct 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
NEMATIC VS LAMELLAR ORDER IN COLLOIDAL AQUEOUS SUSPENSIONS OF NANOSHEETS

J.-C. P. Gabriel ¹*, C. Penisson ², P. Davidson ³

¹DRF, ²ICSM, CEA, Grenoble, ³Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, CNRS, Orsay, France

**Abstract:** Ordering 2D colloidal particles at the nanometer length-scale is currently a challenging and active research area in materials science.¹ Such ordering can spontaneously appear when anisotropic objects form liquid-crystalline phases. Well known for organic species, this tendency also exists for disk-like mineral particles², thus leading to nematic, lamellar and columnar mesophases. In the case of nanosheets (defined as two-dimensional crystallites of sub-micronic diameter and of well-defined, small, thickness comparable to the unit-cell size), nematic and lamellar phases were reported for clay particles, graphene and graphene oxide, titanates or niobates but so far, no columnar phase was ever described for such objects. Among nanosheets, phosphatoantimonate single layers (H₃Sb₃P₂O₁₄) were shown to display a liquid-crystalline lamellar phase³ comprised of planar solid-like sheets (i.e. in which all atoms involved in a layer are covalently bonded) dispersed in water. Upon dilution, the lamellar spacing could be increased 100 fold, leading to 1D periodicities tunable from 1.5 to 225 nm. For such systems, significant differences were observed for two compounds of the same family, H₃Sb₃P₂O₁₄ and HSbP₂O₈, as the former leads to a lamellar phase whereas the latter only shows a nematic phase. Likewise, clay and graphene nanosheets self-assemble into nematic phases whereas niobates and phosphates sometimes display lamellar phases. The physical origin of such a difference in behavior remains largely unknown so far but might be ascribed to differences in sheet size, rigidity, polydispersity, and/or interaction potentials.

In this context, we will present the results of our recent detailed structural investigation by polarized-light optical microscopy and x-ray scattering of both lamellar and nematic phases in the system of phosphatoantimonates.⁴

**References:** [1] Coleman J.N. et al. (2011). Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials. Science **331**, 568-571.

[2] Davidson P., Gabriel J-C. P. (2005). Mineral Liquid Crystals. Current Opinion Coll. Inter. Sci. **9**, 377-383.

[3] Gabriel J.-C. P. et al. (2001). Swollen Liquid-Crystalline Lamellar Phase Based on Extended Solid-Like Sheets. Nature **413**, 504-508.

[4] Davidson et al. Submitted, 2018.