# Detecting volcanic ash of eruption plumes on Venus by imaging in the near infrared windows

Nils Müller, Shubham Kulkarni, Maxence Lefevre, Emmanuel Marcq, Raphael Garcia, Matthias Grott, Heike Rauer

► To cite this version:

Nils Müller, Shubham Kulkarni, Maxence Lefevre, Emmanuel Marcq, Raphael Garcia, et al. Detecting volcanic ash of eruption plumes on Venus by imaging in the near infrared windows. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2025, Sep 2025, Helsinki, Finland. 10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1485. hal-05280695

HAL Id: hal-05280695

https://hal.science/hal-05280695v1

Submitted on 25 Sep 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Detecting volcanic ash of eruption plumes on Venus by imaging in the near infrared windows

**Nils Müller**<fnref n="1" />, **Shubham Kulkarni**<fnref n="2" />, **Maxence Lefevre**<fnref n="3" />, **Emmanuel Marcq**<fnref n="3" />, **Raphael Garcia**<fnref n="4" />, **Matthias Grott**<fnref n="5" />, and **Heike Rauer**<fnref n="1" />

Volcanic outgassing shapes the evolution of the atmospheres of terrestrial planets, but is itself affected by the atmospheric pressure (Head and Wilson 1986, Phillips et al. 2001, Gaillard and Scaillet 2014). Outgassing can take place in form of explosive eruptions where the exsolution of volatiles from ascending magma accelerates the ascent and drives further exsolution. Observations by Pioneer Venus and Venus Express show that the abundance of SO₂ above the cloud layer (>70 km) varies by two to three orders of magnitude on timescales ranging from weeks to decades and one of the hypotheses brought forward is that explosive eruption plumes cause enhanced mixing between the SO₂-rich (>100 ppm) lower atmosphere below the clouds, and the SO₂-poor (<1 ppm) upper atmosphere above the clouds. (Esposito 1988, Marcq et al. 2013). Models of eruption plumes however show that only very intense eruptions originating at relative high elevations can reach this height (Glaze 1999). On Earth, eruptions of this intensity are rare, lower volume rate eruptions are more frequent. Plume height scales with volume rate (e.g. Glaze 1998, Airey et al. 2015). Thus there is a high probability that there are significantly more plumes that do not reach the cloud layer. Even if the SO₂ variation has a non-volcanic origin, there is evidence suggesting explosive eruptions in form of diffuse deposits that are interpreted as being formed by pyroclastic flows from collapsing volcanic ash plumes (e.g Campbell et al. 2017). A re-analysis of Venera 13 descent spectroscopic measurements suggests the presence of particles that could be volcanic ash at altitudes around 4 km (Kulkarni et al. 2025).

The frequency of such explosive eruptions is of high scientific interest. The atmospheric pressure suppresses exsolution so that the transition from an effusive to an explosive eruption requires a combination of high eruption rates and high abundance of magmatic volatiles, most importantly H₂O (Airey et al. 2015). The volatile content of Venusian magmas and outgassing efficiency is important for understanding the evolution of the atmosphere (Galliard et al. 2014). The search for locally enhanced H₂O abundance is an objective of near-infrared imaging of atmospheric windows by upcoming missions to Venus (e.g. Wilson et al. 2024). The H₂O abundance is derived from increased extinction of thermal emission at wavelength of H₂O absorption lines relative to wavelengths with no sensitivity to H₂O (e.g. Bézard et al. 2009), thus requires at least two spectral bands.

The ash entrained in a volcanic plume is however also a significant source of extinction that can reach a large areal extent. On Venus the surface and atmospheric thermal emission radiance in near infrared window regions is sufficiently bright to be measurable through the cloud layer with optical thicknesses on the order of 20-40, however this is due to the very high single scattering albedo of cloud droplets allowing multiple scattering without significant absorptions. The single scattering albedo of volcanic ash particles is lower, resulting in a strong reduction of diffusely transmitted

<footnote n="1">¹Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Geological Sciences, Berlin, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, IPSL, LATMOS, Guyancourt, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵German Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Institute of Space Research, Berlin, Germany</footnote>
radiance. In large (Plinian) eruption plumes the hot ash gas mixture buoyantly rises until it reaches
near ambient temperature, at which the finer ash particles spread out laterally, forming a so-called
umbrella layer. The umbrella regions of eruption plume can be hundreds of km in diameter (e.g.
Gupta et al. 2022) which is large compared to the blurring effect caused by multiple scattering of
thermal infrared radiation within the clouds (~ 90 km) (Hashimoto and Imamura 2001).

We model the effect of a Plinian eruption plume umbrella layer on radiance observed in the near infrared window regions using the NEMESIS radiative transfer code (Irwin et al. 2008), in order to understand under which conditions a plume would be clearly visible. This is done by introducing various amounts of ash particles with optical properties from Deguine et al. (2020) at various altitudes between the surface and cloud layer. We assume that the particles at the outside of the plume quickly equilibrate with the environment and are thus at ambient temperature. This is supported by Earth remote sensing observations of exceedingly cold brightness temperatures at the top of eruption plume umbrella layers at high altitudes (e.g. Gupta et al. 2022). If the ash layer is sufficiently opaque and at sufficiently higher altitude than the source region of the background emission there is a reduction in top of atmosphere radiance that exceeds the modulation that can be introduced by Venus cloud opacity variations.

Under these conditions a plume can be clearly distinguished in images at just a single wavelength.
This would allow imagers with a spectral filter such as Venus Express VMC, Akatsuki IR1, or Parker
Solar Probe WISPR to detect such a plume while water vapor abundance measurements have so far
mostly been proposed for multispectral or hyperspectral instruments. With a sufficient imaging
frequency, even plumes signatures that do not exceed the typical modulation by clouds could be
distinguished via their lower zonal velocity.

The above existing and planned Envision and VERITAS datasets could detect eruption plumes but do
not represent a very extensive monitoring capability due to the limited frequency and areal coverage
of imaging. However, there are mission concepts focused on monitoring to search for seismic waves
via airglow (e.g. Garcia et al. 2024). Our model shows that a plume umbrella of an optical thickness
of 10 at an altitude of >10 km would result in a radiance reduction of 50 % in the thermal emission
background of the 1.27 µm airglow band. Mission concepts involving frequently imaging much of the
nightside of Venus at a near infrared window wavelengths such as 1.27 µm present the best chance
of detecting an volcanic eruption plume.

References:

Head&Wilson1986.doi:10.1029/JB091iB09p09407

Phillips&al.2001.doi:10.1029/2000GL011821

Gaillard&Scaillet2014.doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.009

Esposito&al.1988, doi:10.1029/JD093iD05p05267

Marcq&al.2013.doi:10.1038/ngeo1650

Glaze1999.doi:10.1029/1998JE000619

Airey&al.2015.doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.01.009

Campbell&al.2017.doi:10.1002/2017JE005299

Kulkarni&al.2025.doi:10.1029/2024JE008728

Wilson&al.2024.doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01054-5

Bézard&al.2009.doi:10.1029/2008JE003251

Gupta&al.2022.doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00606-3

Hashimoto&Imamura2001.doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6713

Irwin&al.2008.doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006

Deguine&al.2020.doi:10.1364/AO.59.000884

Garcia&al.2024.doi:10.1029/2024EA003670