# The white test for intraoperative screening of bile leakage: a potential trigger factor for acute pancreatitis after liver resection-a case series

Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Bollon, Jean-François Hak, Laurent Reydellet, Valéry Blasco, Farouk Tradi, Guillaume Louis, Emilie Grégoire, Jean Hardwigsen

► To cite this version:

Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Bollon, Jean-François Hak, Laurent Reydellet, Valéry Blasco, et al. The white test for intraoperative screening of bile leakage: a potential trigger factor for acute pancreatitis after liver resection-a case series. BMC Surgery, 2021, 21 (1), pp.356. 10.1186/s12893-021-01354-5. hal-03603302

HAL Id: hal-03603302

https://amu.hal.science/hal-03603302

Submitted on 9 Mar 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
## CASE REPORT

## Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# The white test for intraoperative screening of bile leakage: a potential trigger factor for acute pancreatitis after liver resection—a case series

Sophie Chopinet<fnref n="1" />,⁴,⁵*, Emilie Bollon<fnref n="1" />,⁵, Jean-François Hak³,⁴,⁵, Laurent Reydellet²,⁵, Valéry Blasco²,⁵, Farouk Tradi³,⁴,⁵, Guillaume Louis³,⁵, Emilie Grégoire<fnref n="1" />,⁴,⁵ and Jean Hardwigsen<fnref n="1" />,⁵

### Abstract

**Background:** Acute pancreatitis after liver resection is a rare but serious complication, and few cases have been described in the literature. Extended lymphadenectomy, and long ischemia due to the Pringle maneuver could be responsible of post-liver resection acute pancreatitis, but the exact causes of AP after hepatectomy remain unclear.

**Cases presentation:** We report here three cases of AP after hepatectomy and we strongly hypothesize that this is due to the bile leakage white test. 502 hepatectomy were performed at our center and 3 patients (0.6%) experienced acute pancreatitis after LR and all of these three patients underwent the white test at the end of the liver resection. None underwent additionally lymphadenectomy to the liver resection. All patient had a white-test during the liver surgery. We identified distal implantation of the cystic duct in these three patients as a potential cause for acute pancreatitis.

**Conclusion:** The white test is useful for detection of bile leakage after liver resection, but we do not recommend a systematic use after LR, because severe acute pancreatitis can be lethal for the patient, especially in case of distal cystic implantation which may facilitate reflux in the main pancreatic duct.

**Keywords:** Acute pancreatitis, White test, Hepatectomy, Bile leakage, Case series

### Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare but serious complication after liver resection, and few cases have been described in the literature [1]. Extended lymphadenectomy [2], and long ischemia due to the Pringle maneuver could be responsible of post-liver resection acute pancreatitis, but the exact causes of AP after hepatectomy remain unclear. We report here three cases of AP after hepatectomy and we strongly hypothesize that this is due to the bile leakage

white test. Bile leakage is a serious complication after liver resection (LR) rising from 3.8 to 10% [3–5], and up to 30% after major liver resection in recent series. Biliary complications after liver resection increases mortality rate, hospital stay and the development of intra-abdominal sepsis and liver failure [6]. Several studies and randomized control trial have compared the benefit of bile leakage test to reduce post LR bilious complications and several products have been compared [7]. Saline solution seems to be the less efficient agent. Blue methyl test or indocyanine green test are efficient for bile leakage detection and are easily available in all center, but the test can't be repeated because of color contamination of the liver

<footnote>*Correspondence: sophiechopinet@hotmail.com</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital la Timone, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
section. Finally, recent studies have shown the benefits of fat emulsion, generally used for parenteral nutrition, which is easily available. The white test can be repeated without contamination of the liver section after washing away with saline solution [8].

From January 2017 to November 2020, 502 hepatectomy were performed at our center and 3 patients (0.6%) experienced acute pancreatitis after LR and all of these three patients underwent the white test at the end of the liver resection.

Briefly, at the end of the hepatectomy, a cannula is inserted in the cystic duct: The fat emulsion is injected slowly after clamping the main bile duct under the cannula for screening of bile leakage on the liver section. After removing the cannula the product was let out through the cystic before closing the cystic duct to release pressure in the biliary tract. In our center, the white test is performed to detect bile leak. The white test wasn't systematically performed at the end of each hepatectomy but only in case of high risk of bile leak at the surgeon's discretion. Despite this test can be very useful to highlight bile leakage, we deplored adverse events that have never been described in the literature.

We report here, a three-cases series of severe acute pancreatitis after liver resection. None underwent additionally lymphadenectomy to the liver resection. The three patients had a white-test during the liver surgery and we identified distal implantation of the cystic duct in these three patients.

## Case A

Patient A, a 72-year-old man, underwent a bisegmentectomy V-VI for hepatocellular carcinoma on NASH in November 2020. His comorbidities were high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation under treatments of anticoagulants. The review of his medical history showed that the white test was a trigger factor for post-hepatectomy pancreatitis. Upon admission, a bisegmentectomy was carried out, an intermittent portal triad

clamping (10/5), the pringle maneuver was performed, the total warm ischemia time was 47 min. No complications occurred. The amount of blood loss was estimated at 300 cc. However, at the end of the parenchymal transection, bile leakage was suspected and a bile leakage test or white test was performed. A cannula was introduced in the cystic duct, and fat emulsion was injected slowly. The bile duct was clamped at the upper border of the pancreas to put the intrahepatic bile duct on pressure and to facilitate the visualization of the bile leakage. No bile leakage was highlighted with the white test. No complications occurred during the following 24 h. The patient was discharge from the intensive care unit at 48 h. Rapidly, his respiratory condition deteriorates, with hemodynamic failure, metabolic acidosis, and coagulopathy. A CT was performed at 72H postoperatively, and showed a necrotic pancreatitis with a necrosis of 40% of the body and tail of the pancreas (Fig. 1). The patient was admitted at the ICU, and his condition continued to deteriorate and died from multi-organ failure.

## Case B

Patient B, a 66-year-old man, who underwent right hepatectomy in January 2017 for HCC on F2 liver fibrosis post hepatitis C infection experienced post liver resection pancreatitis. Review of this case showed the white test as the trigger factor of pancreatitis. During the surgery, portal intermittent clamping was performed (15/5) and the whole warm ischemic time was 48 min. After the surgery, several cofounding factors have hampered the diagnosis of pancreatitis. Postoperative bleeding occurred at postoperative day 5. A diaphragmatic artery has been embolized. An abdominal compartment syndrome occurred 2 days after the radiologic embolization due to the amount of hemoperitoneum. An open peritoneal toilet was performed with copious volumes of warm normal saline. The patient condition rapidly improved until postoperative day 14, when he experienced severe sepsis. The abdominal CT showed a large collection in the

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Patient A. A Preoperative CT showing HCC in segment VI (white asterisk). B Preoperative CT, distal implantation of the cystic duct (white arrow). C CT scan at POD 1 showing necrosis of the tail of the pancreas</figcaption></figure>
resection area and peri-pancreatic collection. A bilioma was suspected and an open surgical drainage and peri- toneal toilet was performed. No bile leakage and no bile fluid were identified, but there was multiple septic col- lections and cystosteatotic nodes. Intra-peritoneal fluid dosage revealed high amount of Amylase > 4000 UI/L and Lipase > 4000 UI/L and pancreatitis was diagnosed. The clinical condition improved and the patient discharged from the hospital at day 45. A Cholangio-pancreato-MRI was performed at postoperative day 90 and showed a pseudocyst in the uncus of the pancreas. No long-term complications, and no HCC recurrence during the fol- low-up. The follow-up time was 40 months.

Case C

Patient C, a 65-years-old man, with high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and chronic alcohol consumption comorbidities underwent posterior sectoriectomy for HCC on October 2017. Preoperative blood test showed: platelets: 160 G/L, Prothrombin time: 100%, AFP: 8.1 ng/ mL, and normal liver test. An Intermittent pedicule clamping (10/5) was performed, the total warm ischemic time was 34 min. A bile leakage white test was performed at the end of the liver resection. No bile leakage was identified. One hour after the surgery, hemorrhage in the abdominal drain occurred and an evacuation of the hemoperitoneum has been performed. His clinical condi- tion improved, and the patient was discharged from the

hospital at POD 7. At POD 14, the patient experienced abdominal sepsis, fever and abdominal pain. An abdomi- nal CT showed: severe pancreatitis with walled-off pan- creatic necrosis (Fig. 2). External radiologic tube was placed to drain walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Despite efficient drainage, his clinical condition was deteriorating and a reintervention was performed to drain septic peri- pancreatic collections. Then, his clinical condition rap- idly improved and the patient was discharged at POD 35. No long-term complications, and no recurrence occurred during the follow-up during the 36 months.

Table 1 summarize the patient's parameters.

An informed consent was received from all the patients prior to the study and, an ethical approval was obtained from the Sud Mediterranean Hospital Ethical committee (Sainte-Marguerite hospital, Marseille).

Discussion

The aim of this three-cases series is to notify hepatobil- iary surgeon about the risk of acute pancreatitis after liver resection due to the white test, especially when the cystic duct is implanted distally. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare but serious complication after liver resec- tion. Sathasivam et al., described a three fatal case series of acute pancreatitis after LR with no obvious cause identified. One case of AP was described after adult-to- adult living donor liver transplantation [9]. Other stud- ies reported an AP after extended lymphadenectomy [2].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Patient C. **A** Preoperative CT showing HCC in segment VI. **B** Postoperative CT scan at day 14 showing acute pancreatitis with abdominal collections (white arrow). **C** MRI, T1-weight, at 1 month after acute pancreatitis showing regression of the abdominal collections (white arrow)</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1** Characteristics of the three patients</caption><thead><tr><td>Patient</td><td>White test</td><td>Acute pancreatitis grade (CTSI)</td><td>Postoperative day of acute pancreatitis onset</td><td>Type of liver resection</td><td>Intermittent pedicule clamping (duration)</td><td>Hospital stay (day)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Patient A</td><td>Yes</td><td>8</td><td>D1</td><td>Bisegmentectomy V–VI</td><td>Yes (47 min)</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>Patient B</td><td>Yes</td><td>4</td><td>D10</td><td>Right hepatectomy</td><td>Yes (48 min)</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>Patient C</td><td>Yes</td><td>6</td><td>D14</td><td>Posterior sectoriectomy</td><td>Yes (34 min)</td><td>35</td></tr></tbody></table>
None of the patients in our series had extended lymphadenectomy associated to liver resection. We have hypothesized that reflux in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is favored by a distal implantation of the cystic duct. In case of distal implantation of cystic duct clamping of the pedicle to put pressure on the main bile duct remains hard to perform. Data regarding the implantation of the cystic duct were not available for all patients who underwent hepatectomy at our center. But, all of the three patients had a distal cystic duct implantation. In this series of cases, the white-test was performed with a cannula inserted in the cystic duct, and the remaining hepatic duct is usually closed during the liver transection.

The white test is largely recommended to reduce the bile leakage rate during a hepatectomy (Table 2). Linke et al. [8] in a meta-analysis described that injection of the fat emulsion in the cystic duct, or in the right or left hepatic duct, during hepatectomy reduce the incidence of biliary leakage but the authors suggested to performed a randomized controlled trial in hepatic surgery of white test vs no test after hepatic surgery.

In living donor hepatectomies, intraoperative cholangiography and methylene blue test is usually performed to lead to higher intraoperative detection of bile leak [10], however no adverse events occurred.

This case series has several limitations, as it is difficult to prove that acute pancreatitis is directly related to the injection of the white test and not to any other non-specific cause after liver surgery. Regarding cases B and C, several factors can be confusing. In case B, an embolization for hemorrhage from a diaphragmatic artery was performed, but the embolization was selective and distant from any branches vascularizing the pancreas. In case C, the patient had a history of hypercholesterolemia treated with a statin drug, and a chronic consumption of alcohol that had been weaned off 1 month prior to the surgery. In this study, acute pancreatitis has been proven by biological tests and confirmed on imaging exams. The only common elements between these three cases were the use of the white test during hepatectomy. In conclusion the white test is useful for detection of bile leakage, but could have adverse effects and lead to severe acute

pancreatitis, especially in cases of distal implantation of the cystic duct.

**Abbreviations**

AP: Acute pancreatitis; LR: Liver resection; MPD: Main pancreatic duct.

**Acknowledgements**

None to declare.

**Authors' contributions**

SC, EB, EG analysed and interpreted the data. SC wrote the paper with input from all authors. JFH, FT, and GL analysed and interpreted the CT and MRI data. LR, VB, JH, EG revised and corrected the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

**Funding**

There was no funding associated with the completion of the work.

**Availability of data and materials**

Not applicable.

**Declarations**

**Ethics approval and consent to participate**

This case series has been approved by the ethical committee Sud Méditeranée 2 (Sainte-Marguerite hospital, Marseille)

**Consent for publication**

The patients included in this study or the patient's next to kin have provided written informed consent for publication of the cases. All the authors gave their consent for the publication of this study.

**Competing interests**

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

**Author details**

¹Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital la Timone, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France. ²Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital la Timone, Marseille, France. ³Department of Radiology, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France. ⁴Aix Marseille Univ, LIIE, Marseille, France. ⁵Aix Marseille Univ, CERIMED, Marseille, France.

Received: 30 May 2021 Accepted: 23 September 2021

Published online: 02 October 2021

**References**

1. Sathasivam S, Ritchie A, Brooks AJ, Morris DL. Acute pancreatitis following liver resection: report of three fatal cases and a review of the literature. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(8):643–5.

2. Ratti F, Fiorentini G, Cipriani F, Paganelli M, Catena M, Aldrighetti L. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors: a propensity-score-based, case-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(2):564–75.

3. Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B, Lourdais A, Sulpice L, Laurent S, et al. Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(3):224–9.

4. Hoekstra LT, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ, Busch OR. Posthepatectomy bile leakage: how to manage. Dig Surg. 2012;29(1):48–53.

5. Hayashi K, Abe Y, Shinoda M, Kitago M, Yagi H, Oshima G, et al. Clinical impact of intraoperative bile leakage during laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc. 2020;35:4134–42.

6. Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(1):38–46.

<table><caption>**Table 2** Characteristics of the studies with intraoperative bile leakage white test</caption><thead><tr><th>Authors</th><th>Year</th><th>Study design</th><th>Sample</th><th>comparison</th><th>Country</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Li et al</td><td>2009</td><td>Cohort</td><td>63 vs 74</td><td>WT vs No test</td><td>Germany</td></tr><tr><td>Liu et al</td><td>2012</td><td>RCT</td><td>53 vs 54</td><td>WT vs No test</td><td>China</td></tr><tr><td>Leelawat et al</td><td>2012</td><td>Cohort</td><td>30</td><td>WT + saline test</td><td>Thailand</td></tr><tr><td>Linke et al</td><td>2015</td><td>Cohort</td><td>32 vs 93</td><td>WT vs No test</td><td>Germany</td></tr></tbody></table>
7. Ijichi M, Takayama T, Toyoda H, Sano K, Kubota K, Makuuchi M. Randomized trial of the usefulness of a bile leakage test during hepatic resection. Arch Surg. 2000;135(12):1395-400.

8. Linke R, Ulrich F, Bechstein WO, Schnitzbauer AA. The white-test helps to reduce biliary leakage in liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2015;14(2):161-7.

9. Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL. Technical refinement in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft. Ann Surg. 2000;231(1):126-31.

10. Tuysuz U, Aktas H, Batı IB, Emiroglu R. The role of Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and methylene blue tests in reducing bile leakage after living donor hepatectomies. Asian J Surg. 2020;44:147-52.

**Publisher's Note**

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ready to submit your research? Choose BMC and benefit from:

* fast, convenient online submission

* thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field

* rapid publication on acceptance

* support for research data, including large and complex data types

* gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations

* maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year

At BMC, research is always in progress.

Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions

BMC