# Novel Precursor-Derived Meso-/Macroporous TiO2/SiOC Nanocomposites with Highly Stable Anatase Nanophase Providing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity and Superior Adsorption of Organic Dyes

Eranezhuth Wasan Awin, Abhijeet Lale, Kollamala Chellappan Nair Hari Kumar, Umit B. Demirci, Samuel Bernard, Ravi Kumar

► To cite this version:

Eranezhuth Wasan Awin, Abhijeet Lale, Kollamala Chellappan Nair Hari Kumar, Umit B. Demirci, Samuel Bernard, et al. Novel Precursor-Derived Meso-/Macroporous TiO2/SiOC Nanocomposites with Highly Stable Anatase Nanophase Providing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity and Superior Adsorption of Organic Dyes. Materials, 2018, 11 (3), pp.362. 10.3390/ma11030362. [hal-01822498]

HAL Id: hal-01822498

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01822498

Submitted on 25 May 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Novel Precursor-Derived Meso-/Macroporous TiO₂/SiOC Nanocomposites with Highly Stable Anatase Nanophase Providing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity and Superior Adsorption of Organic Dyes

Eranezhuth Wasan Awin <fnref n="1" />, Abhijeet Lale <fnref n="2" />, Kollamala Chellappan Nair Hari Kumar <fnref n="1" />,
Umit Bilge Demirci <fnref n="3" /> ID, Samuel Bernard <fnref n="2" /> ID and Ravi Kumar <fnref n="1" />,* ID

Received: 26 December 2017; Accepted: 27 February 2018; Published: 1 March 2018

**Abstract:** Titania (TiO₂) is considered to have immense potential as a photocatalyst, the anatase phase in particular. There have been numerous attempts to push the limits of its catalytic activity to higher wavelengths to harness the visible electromagnetic radiation. Most of the investigations till date have been restricted to fine-tuning the bandgap by doping, control of defect chemistry at the surface and several to first principle simulations either with limited success or success at the cost of complexities in processing. Here, we report a simple and elegant way of preparing ceramics through precursor chemistry which involves synthesis of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites with in situ formation of TiO₂ nanocrystals into a robust and protecting SiOC matrix. The in situ nanoscaled TiO₂ is anatase of size 9–10 nm, which is uniformly distributed in an amorphous SiOC matrix forming a new generation of nanocomposites that combine the robustness, structural stability and durability of the SiOC matrix while achieving nanoscaled TiO₂ functionalities. The stabilization of the anatase phase even at temperature as high as 1200 °C was evident. With an average pore size of 6.8 nm, surface area of 129 m<fnref n="2" />/g (BET) and pore volume of 0.22 cm<fnref n="3" />/g (BET), mesoporosity was achieved in the nanocomposites. The composites exhibited visible light photocatalytic activity, which is attributed to the Ti–O–C/TiC bonds resulting in the reduction of band gap by 0.2 to 0.9 eV. Furthermore, the heterojunction formed between the amorphous SiOC and crystalline TiO₂ is also expected to minimize the recombination rate of electron-hole pair, making these novel nanocomposites based on TiO₂ extremely active in visible wavelength regime.

**Keywords:** silicon oxycarbide; precursor derived ceramics; photocatalysis; adsorption

## 1. Introduction

Silicon oxycarbide (SiOC), known for its high temperature stability, is a network-like structure consisting of an amorphous SiOC phase and free carbon [1]. Owing to the high mechanical stability, chemical inertness and oxidation resistance, SiOC offers to be a promising candidate as a host to anchor the photocatalyst [2–5]. Recently, incorporation of titanium into Si–O–C has shown to modify the

<footnote n="1">¹ Laboratory for High Performance Ceramics, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras), Chennai 600036, India; eranezhuth@gmail.com (E.W.A.); kchkumar@iitm.ac.in (K.C.N.H.K.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Science des Procédés Céramiques et de Traitements de Surface (SPCTS), UMR CNRS 7315, Centre Européen de la Céramique, 12 rue Atlantis, 87068 Limoges CEDEX, France; abhijeet.lale@unilim.fr (A.L.); samuel.bernard@unilim.fr (S.B.)</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ IEM (Institut Europeen des Membranes), UMR 5635 (CNRS-ENSCM-UM), Universite Montpellier, Place E. Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier, France; Umit.Demirci@iemm.univ-montp2.fr</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: nvrk@iitm.ac.in</footnote>
crystallite state of this multiphasic material and is expected to offer photocatalytic activity depending up on the formation of catalytically active phases [6].

Titania has been widely investigated as a photocatalyst for the degradation of contaminants ever since its photocatalytic effect was reported by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [7]. Extensive studies have been carried out in the areas of water purification, air purification and solar cells because of its low cost and high thermal stability [8–12]. The kinetically stabilized anatase phase is more photocatalytically active which transforms to the thermodynamically stable rutile phase on heating [13,14]. However, the photoexcitation in the UV-region and high recombination rate of the photogenerated electron-hole pair limits its applications for practical purposes. Another drawback is the poor adsorption of titania to some of the organic pollutants [15]. Several methods have been adopted in the past so as to excite TiO₂ in the visible light, which includes non-metal doping [16–20], non-metal co-doping [21,22], oxygen-rich TiO₂ modification [23], noble and transition metal deposition [24–33], dye sensitization [34–36], coupled semiconductors [37,38] and defect induced doping [24].

In general, low concentration of dye can only be removed by the photocatalytic degradation process. Hence, the failure to treat highly concentrated dye solution has necessitated the need to develop materials exhibiting a combinatorial effect of high adsorption and photocatalysis. Immobilization of TiO₂ on a mesoporous host with high surface area can immensely contribute to the enhancement in photocatalytic activity [39–41]. The photocatalytic activity of TiO₂/silicon carbide (SiC) systems reported by Christian et al. has been attributed to the synergetic effect between both the semiconductors that reduces the recombination rate of the electron-hole pair [42]. TiO₂ coated on three-dimensional β-SiC foam, under UV-radiation was found to photodegrade [43]. In addition to this, the formation of heterojunction has been found to effectively decrease the recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs [44–46]. Recently, Hojamberdiev et al. demonstrated the photocatalytic activity of mesoporous SiOC/TiO₂ and SiOC/N-doped TiO₂ in which TiO₂ particles were added ex situ [47]. However, the ex situ addition of titania particles in an amorphous matrix inherently leads to problems such as agglomeration and large grain growth [48]. In addition, the photocatalytic effect of a material depends on its crystallinity, morphology and specific surface area [49–52]. Hence, the processing route plays a major role.

The precursor derived ceramic (PDC) route allows enough flexibility in fine tuning the composition as well as the micro/nanostructures of the composites [53–56]. The low processing temperature and the capability to produce intricate shape makes it unique among the processing routes. This route is well adapted to prepare nanocomposites through an in situ process as we target here. The basis for this approach comes from the reaction between two precursors in which uniform chemical composition is established at molecular scale. The resulting compound is converted into a single-phase amorphous ceramic in the first pyrolysis step. The latter is subsequently heat-treated at higher temperature to initiate the crystallization and provide the material with tuned phase composition and nano-/microstructure organization [57–61]. The present work investigates a precursor approach towards the in situ synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO₂ in a highly thermally robust amorphous SiOC matrix. The resulting nanocomposites show that the presence of carbon in the TiO₂ lattice allows harnessing visible light for photocatalytic activity. The anatase phase stability was greatly enhanced (up to 1200 °C) in the macroporous composite, attributable to the presence of an amorphous SiOC matrix. Furthermore, the confinement of carbon doped TiO₂ nanocrystals in a thermally stable amorphous matrix is expected to avoid their agglomeration and grain growth.

In order to synthesize mesoporous nanocomposite, hard templating approach was adopted resulting in enhanced surface area and adsorption kinetics. Introduction of mesoporosity in SiOC assists in high adsorption and eventually visible light photocatalysis is achieved by the presence of the stabilized anatase phase. The differences in synthesis route adopted for the production of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposite was detailed and the resulting phase, crystal size, bonding characteristics, porosity, micro and nanostructural features were compared. The possible mechanism of adsorption and photocatalysis is detailed from the methylene blue dye degradation studies.
## 2. Experiment

### 2.1. *Design of Meso-/Macroporous Compounds*

#### 2.1.1. Synthesis of Macroporous Nanocomposite

The precursors selected for the synthesis of TiO₂/SiOC were commercially available polyhydridomethylsiloxane (PHMS) and titanium n-tetrabutoxide (TB) (Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India). The liquid precursors were chosen for facile processing and equal vol % of the precursors were taken in a round bottom flask, stirred for 60 min continuously using a magnetic stirrer to initiate the reaction. The mixed solution was then transferred to a tubular furnace and was cross-linked at 300 °C for 2 h. The cross-linked polymer was then subsequently heat-treated to 1200 °C for 5 h with a heating rate of 5 °C/min in air. A foamy structure was produced which was ground using a mortar and pestle to a fine powder. The schematic of the synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 1. The thermogravimetric analysis (Figure S1) for a mixture of 50 vol % of each of the precursors (carried out in air) suggests that the initial polymeric mixture exhibited mass loss in three stages. The first stage (25–250 °C) is assigned to the loss of water and alcohols whereas the second (250–450 °C) and third stages (450–800 °C) could be attributed to the decomposition of the polymer and release of methane and hydrogen gases, respectively. There was no noticeable mass loss beyond 800 °C. The crosslinking temperature was chosen to be 300 °C to maximize the yield.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Schematic diagram of the general process for the synthesis of macroporous TiO₂/SiOC nanocomposite.</figcaption></figure>

#### 2.1.2. Synthesis of Mesoporous Nanocomposites

The first stage of synthesis involves impregnation of 1 mL of PHMS into 0.2 g of mesoporous carbon (Sigma-Aldrich, Bangalore, India) by continuously stirring for 48 h. The mixture was then pyrolyzed in argon atmosphere at 1000 °C for 2 h maintaining a heating rate of 2 °C/min in ambient conditions. The mixing of pyrolyzed product with 1 mL of TB for 24 h and subsequently heat-treated at 500 °C in air for 10 h forms the second stage. The completion of the first stage involves the formation
of mesoporous SiOC-C composite and the second stage results in the materialization of TiO₂/SiOC nanocomposite removing the carbon template. The schematic of the synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 2. The disordered mesoporous nature of the nanocomposite was visualized through SEM and the pore size estimated using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique was found to be around 6.8 nm.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Schematic diagram illustrating the generalized process for the synthesis of mesoporous TiO₂/SiOC nanocomposite.</figcaption></figure>

## 2.2. Characterizations

The thermogravimetry analysis (NETZSCH STA 409, Selb, Germany) of initial polymeric mixture [PHMS and TB (1:1)] was carried out in static air flow at a heating rate of 5 °C/min to 1400 °C. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis (Perkin Elmer Spectrum, Hatfield, PA, USA) of the powder sample was also done to ensure whether proper ceramization has occurred. The samples were mixed with infra-red IR irradiated potassium bromide and pelletized before subjecting to FTIR analysis. The samples were subjected to XRD (D8 Discover, Bruker AXS X-ray diffractometer, Madison, WI, USA), scan limit in the range 2θ ≤ 2θ ≥ 90° in increments of 0.02° with a time per step of 15 s. The peaks were identified with the aid of Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) data files for TiO₂. The average crystallite size was determined using Scherrer's equation assuming the shape of the particles to be spherical. The Rietveld analysis of the diffracted pattern was performed using MAUD software. The software applies RITA/RISTA method for the analysis which was developed by Wenk, Ferrari and Lutterotti [62]. The Raman spectra (Labram HR 800, Horiba, Minami-Ku, Kyoto, Japan) of the powdered samples was acquired with a He-Ne laser source (488 nm), recorded in the range between 100 and 4000 cm⁻¹. The microstructural as well as elemental analysis of the sample was done using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI Quanta 200 & 400, Calabasas, CA, USA) and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (FEI Quanta 200 & 400, Calabasas, CA, USA). The samples were subjected to gold sputtering prior to the SEM analysis. The nano-structural features of the samples (particle size and crystal structure) was ensured using transmission electron microscopy (JEOL 3010, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kV accelerating voltage. The powder sample was dissolved in acetone, ultrasonicated for 1 h and a droplet was poured on to a copper grid for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy XPS (Omnicron nanotechnology, ESCA-14, Taunusstein, Germany) investigation was
carried out at ambient atmosphere maintaining the base pressure in the measurement chamber to less than 10⁻⁷ Pa. Al Kα (1486.6 eV) was used as radiation source and CASA XPS software was used to deconvolute the XPS spectra. The surface area (S<sub>BET</sub>) as well as the pore volume was determined using a BET analyzer (TriStar 3020, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherm at -196 °C was used to quantify the porosity. Prior to the measurement, the powder was preheated at 150 °C for 12 h in vacuum.

## 2.3. *Photocatalytic Studies*

The reaction was carried out in a photoreactor (Heber scientific HIPR-MP400, Tamil Nadu, India). The dye, methylene blue (100 mL, 0.03 mM) was taken in a glass vessel to which 50 mg of the catalyst was added. The solution was then placed on a magnetic stirrer, which was continuously stirred for 2 h in the dark in order to attain the adsorption-desorption equilibrium. Subsequently, the solution was exposed to visible light radiation (500 W tungsten halogen lamp, with spectral distribution from 400-700 nm) at ambient conditions and under vigorous stirring. A cut off liquid filter (NaNO₂) was used to eliminate any traces of UV light from the tungsten lamp. The degradation study of the dye was carried out with the aid of UV-Vis spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Evolution 220, Waltham, MA, USA). 3 mL was collected at required time intervals (0, 30, 60, 120, 150, and 180 min) and was centrifuged to eliminate the solid particles. The band gap of the sample was determined using UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy DRS) with an integrated sphere attachment.

# 3. Results and Discussion

## 3.1. *Phase Evolution*

X-ray diffractograms (XRD) of macroporous and mesoporous materials showed in Figure 3 were used to understand the phase evolution of the nanocomposites. The XRD results clearly indicate the presence of anatase phase (JCPDS card No. 20-2242). Typically, the transformation temperature in undoped TiO₂ from anatase to rutile is in the temperature range of 700-800 °C [63]. However, here, the anatase phase is stable till 1200 °C for macroporous sample which is attributed to the presence of the amorphous matrix that hindered the conversion from anatase to rutile phases. In the case of macroporous nanocomposite, the temperature was confined to 1200 °C since increasing the temperature above 1200 °C resulted in the crystallization of the undesirable rutile and silica phases (Figure S2), which are photocatalytically not as active as anatase [64]. The average crystallite size determined using Scherrer's equation from the full width half maxima (FWHM) of the most intense TiO₂ peak (101), was found to be 9 and 11 nm for macroporous and mesoporous materials, respectively.

The effect of varying volume fraction of the initial precursors on the crystallization of the phases present in the macroporous samples is displayed in Figure S3. It is clear that crystallization of anatase phase occurred only at 50 vol % of TB, whereas at 10 and 30 vol % the material remained predominantly amorphous at 1200 °C. This is most probably due to increased diffusion barriers offered by the thermally stable Si-O-C matrix [54]. Further increase in amount of TB resulted in the crystallization of rutile phase. Hence, 50 vol % was considered to be optimum. The Rietveld refinement of the diffractograms of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites (Figure 3) using Material Analysis Using Diffraction MAUD indicated the crystalline anatase phase to be ~34 wt % and 35 wt %, respectively and the rest being amorphous (Figure S4).

Raman spectroscopy performed on the as-synthesized samples confirmed the presence of anatase and free carbon (graphitic). The spectra shown in Figure 4a indicate the Eg, B₁g, A₁g or B₁g, and Eg modes of the anatase phase. It confirms the absence of rutile phase in the samples. The Raman features of single crystal anatase as well as the macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites are tabulated and shown in Table S1. However, in comparison with the single crystal anatase, both macroporous and mesoporous samples exhibited a frequency shift for Eg peak at 144 and 639 cm⁻¹ (blue shift)
whereas a red shift was observed for B₁g (399) and A₁g (519) peaks (Figure 4b). The shift in peaks could be attributed to the lower crystallite size and oxygen deficiency [65]. The crystallite size calculated from Scherrer's equation also substantiates the frequency shift due to phonon confinement. Since the macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites were synthesized via precursor route and involved heat-treatment, non-stoichiometry is expected [66].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** XRD of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites revealing the presence of anatase phase in an amorphous SiOC matrix (JCPDS card No. 20-2242).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Raman spectra (a) of the samples revealing the anatase phase of TiO₂ in macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites (b) exemplifying the shift in peak and (c) revealing the presence of free carbon.</figcaption></figure>
It is well known that the majority of Si-based carbide/carbonitride/oxycarbide ceramics prepared from preceramic polymers are composed of free carbon at elevated temperature. The two bands at ~1300–1360 and ~1580–1600 cm⁻¹ represents the D (disordered) and G (graphite) peaks, respectively and correspond to the defects present in the hexagonal graphitic structure (Figure 4c) [67].

## 3.2. *Microstructural and Nanostructural Features*

The microstructural characterization carried out with the aid of SEM revealed a foamy appearance for the macroporous samples (Figure 5a). The EDS analysis (Figure 5b) confirmed the presence of silicon, titanium, oxygen and carbon in the nanocomposite. The micrographs of the strut at higher magnification (Figure 5c) confirmed the absence of mesopores, which were as expected since the heat-treatment temperature chosen in the synthesis of macroporous samples (1200 °C) resulted in the sintering of particles leading to the collapse of pores [68]. The micrograph of mesoporous samples as shown in Figure 5d, indicates particle agglomeration with disordered mesoporous structure. The SEM and TEM micrographs of mesoporous carbon are shown in Figure S5.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** (a) SEM micrograph revealing the foamy nature of the macroporous sample; (b) corresponding EDS analysis; (c) Higher magnification micrograph, inset: BET surface area plot; (d) micrograph of mesoporous sample revealing disordered mesoporous structure.</figcaption></figure>

The TEM investigation of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites shown in Figure 6 confirmed the nanocomposite structure of the materials.

The TEM micrographs confirmed the XRD results of the same sample. It indicates that a phase segregation of TiO₂ homogeneously occurs in the samples. The macroporous and mesoporous specimens consist of homogeneously dispersed small nuclei embedded in an amorphous matrix. The size of the nanocrystals varies from 9 to 12 nm, which is in agreement with the size measured from XRD. Although the pyrolysis temperature is relatively high, high resolution transmission electron micrographs HRTEM highlight the interest of our approach to prevent TiO₂ coarsening and retain the anatase nanophase.
The well-defined interplanar spacing was measured from Figure 6b,d; it was found to be 0.35 nm and can be assigned to the (101) plane of anatase. The indexing of selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure S6a,b) confirmed the TiO₂ anatase phase as substantiated by the XRD. The SAED pattern exhibited a discontinuous ring like pattern with distinct spots which indicates the random orientation of TiO₂ crystals. The SiOC matrix exhibits a diffuse ring pattern (not shown), which is in accordance with the amorphous nature of the matrix.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** (a,c) TEM micrographs of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites revealing the well dispersed TiO₂ nanoparticles in an amorphous SiOC matrix, respectively; (b,d) lattice fringes confirming the presence of anatase phase in macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites, respectively.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.3. Characterization of Nanocomposites at the Meso-/Macroscopic Scales

The pore architecture of the macroporous and mesoporous samples was assessed at the mesoscopic length scale by nitrogen gas adsorption–desorption measurements at 77 K. The BET surface area of the macroporous nanocomposite was found to be very small, 0.06 m²·g⁻¹ (not shown) as expected. The N₂ adsorption–desorption curve of the mesoporous sample is shown in Figure 7.

Based on IUPAC classification [69,70], the adsorption–desorption isotherms of the mesoporous sample revealed a type IV-curve suggesting that the samples have uniform mesoporous channels. The shape of the isotherms is asymmetrical with a desorption branch steeper than the adsorption branch at a relative pressure (P/P₀) from 0.45 to 0.95 indicative of H₂ hysteresis loops which are generally found in disordered porous materials or in ordered mesoporous material with 3-D cage-like pores and interconnected pores [71,72]. Therefore, we can say that the sample is mainly mesoporous bearing interconnected porosity. A specific BET surface area of 129 m²·g⁻¹ is measured.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Nitrogen adsorption-desorption curve of the mesoporous sample at -196 °C (inset: Pore size distribution curve).</figcaption></figure>

The total pore volume determined from the amount of nitrogen adsorbed at P/P₀ = 0.97 is 0.22 cm³·g⁻¹. The pore size distribution (PSD) calculated from the desorption branch by means of the Baretт–Joyner–Halenda method is centered at 6.8 nm.

In order to qualify and quantify the macroporosity, mercury intrusion porosimetry was investigated on the macroporous nanocomposite (Figure 8). Here, we have to specify that mercury porosimetry provides information only on the features that control the mercury intrusion—the windows that connect adjacent macropores—and not on the macropore diameters themselves. The first important feature is that the macroporous nanocomposite is robust enough to endure mercury impregnation without collapsing. The sample exhibits porosity as high as 53 vol % and an intrusion volume of 0.46 cm³·g⁻¹.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Pore size distribution of macroporous nanocomposites by mercury intrusion porosimetry.</figcaption></figure>
The macroporous nanocomposite displays a bulk density as low as 1.15 g·cm⁻³. The foam exhibited a macroporous behavior with mean diameters centered at ~25 µm, 45 µm and ~90 µm.

### 3.4. Adsorption/Photocatalytic Degradation Studies

The adsorption/photocatalytic activity of macroporous nanocomposites was evaluated by measuring the decrease in concentration of methylene blue dye (MB) in dark as well as under visible light. The photocatalytic efficiency of the samples was measured by determining the concentration of MB dye at certain intervals after exposing it to the visible light (500 W tungsten halogen lamp with spectral distribution from 400 to 700 nm). The light source was cooled continuously with water cooled jackets so as to maintain ambient temperature. The self-degradation (without catalyst) and the photodegradation of MB using commercial TiO₂ in visible light were performed for 180 min. It is known that MB self-photolyze under visible light illumination and the percentage efficiency is determined by the utilized light power. It was found that under the present condition; only 21% of MB is photolyzed after 3 h. The self-photolysis has also been reported earlier by Junwang Tang et al. where in around 25% of MB was degraded upon usage of a 300 W Xe arc lamp, λ > 420 nm after 2 h [73,74]. The photocatalytic degradation of commercial TiO₂ (crystalline anatase, average particle size—0.5 µm, BET surface area 11 m²/g, SDFCL, India—Figure S7) was also observed to be minimal which pronounces the inactiveness of commercial TiO₂ to visible light photocatalytic activity. Interestingly, as seen in Figure 9a, with prolonged exposure to visible light, the concentration of MB dye decreased. The photodegradation rate constant (k), a basic kinetic parameter, was used to quantify the photocatalytic activity of the samples. Reflecting from the previous studies, the experimental data was fitted with the Langmuir-Hinselwood kinetic model ln(C/C₀) = -kt, where k is the photodegradation rate constant, C is the MB concentration at time t and C₀ is the initial MB concentration at time t = 0 [75]. It is clearly observed from Figure 9b that under visible light exposure, the ln(C/C₀) decreases linearly, indicating a first-order reaction. The calculated rate constant was found to be 4.78 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹. It could be noted that the photodegradation constant was higher than that of the values reported by Hojamberdiev et al. for SiOC/TiO₂ nanocomposite [47].

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** (a) Time dependent UV-vis absorption spectra of macroporous nanocomposite under visible light (inset: Photograph revealing the decolorization of MB); (b) kinetic curves of the degradation of MB by macroporous nanocomposite.</figcaption></figure>

However, for mesoporous nanocomposite, the dye was completely adsorbed by the catalyst within the first 10 min as illustrated in Figure 10a. Hence, in order to evaluate the adsorption kinetics, 25 mg of the catalyst was taken so as to hold back the adsorption process.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Figure 10. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra for 0.03 mM MB with 50 mg of mesoporous nanocomposite; inset: photograph revealing the decolorization of MB; (b) UV-vis absorption spectra for 0.03 mM MB with 25 mg of mesoporous nanocomposite; (c) pseudo first-order kinetics model; (d) pseudo second-order kinetics model; (e) intra particle-diffusion kinetic model.</figcaption></figure>

Figure 10b illustrates the UV-vis absorption spectra of the MB solution after the catalyst was added and implies the decrease in concentration of the dye with respect to time. The color of the MB before and after the adsorption is shown in Figure 10a (inset), which clearly indicates complete adsorption. Three different models were used to fit the experimental data to further investigate the adsorption process. The pseudo first-order kinetic equation [76] and the pseudo second-order equation are given by Equations (1) and (2), respectively.

$$q_t = q_e(1 - e^{-k_1 t}) \qquad (1)$$
$$ \frac{t}{q_t} = \frac{1}{k_2 q_e^2} + \frac{t}{q_e} \qquad (2) $$

where, $q_e$ and $q_t$ are the amounts of adsorbed MB at equilibrium and time $t$, respectively, whereas $k_1$ and $k_2$ denotes the rate constant of pseudo first-order and second-order model, respectively.

The correlation coefficients of pseudo second-order reaction (R² = 0.999) resulted in a higher value in contrast to the pseudo first-order reaction (R² = 0.735). The $q_e$ value determined from the pseudo first-order reaction was found to be largely deviating from the experimentally obtained equilibrium adsorption capacity (Figure 10c). However, the experimental and fitted values of $q_e$ for pseudo second order reaction were equivalent implying the model is valid (Figure 10d). Since the adsorption kinetics was governed by the pseudo second-order reaction, the overall rate of the adsorption process was controlled by chemisorption [76,77]. The mesoporous sample demonstrated high adsorption capacity (15.2 mg/g) when compared to the macroporous sample (0.16 mg/g). This could be attributed to the high surface area possessed by the mesoporous samples.

The Weber–Morris equation based intra particle-diffusion kinetic model was used to determine the kinetics of steps involved during adsorption.

$$ q_t = k_i t^{0.5} + C \qquad (3) $$

where $k_i$ represents the intra-particle diffusion rate constant for adsorption and C denotes the boundary layer thickness [78]. Figure 10e clearly depicts the three different intra-particle diffusion rate constants which articulate the rate limiting steps in adsorption process. The fast adsorption process due to the electrostatic interaction between the MB dye molecules and the mesoporous nanocomposites results in a steep slope ($k_1 = 8.85$); it constitutes the first stage. The gradual diffusion of dye molecules into the mesoporous structure represented by slope $k_2 = 0.67$ forms the second stage of the adsorption process. Finally, the third stage is characterized by a flat slope ($k_3 = 0.09$), attributed to the adsorption process at equilibrium.

The high adsorption of MB molecule could be attributed to the high pore volume (0.216 cm³/g) as revealed from the pore size analysis. The mesopores result in high surface area which aids the adsorption process. On similar grounds, the adsorption study carried out on carbon-TiO₂ reported the preferential adsorption of MB molecules (size—1.43 × 0.61 × 1.4 nm) in the micropores and mesopores [65]. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of mesoporous nanocomposites in contrast to the macroporous counterpart can be attributed to the adsorption kinetics. The large surface area aids in the adsorption process by providing enough sites for the catalyst to adsorb dye molecules. The increased amount of adsorption sites as well as the large surface area induced by mesopores is the reason for high adsorption rate in mesoporous structure.

In order to understand the effect of visible light in the photocatalytic activity of mesoporous nanocomposite, a higher concentration of MB solution (0.06 mM) was prepared and kept in dark for 12 h and the solution was exposed to visible light. The change in absorbance spectra as a function of time clearly reveals the decolonization behavior (Figure 11a). The photodegradation constant determined via Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model (Figure 11b) was found to be 3.0 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹.

It was found that the degradation constant of macroporous nanocomposite (4.8 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹) was higher than the reported values (for 0.03 mM MB solution) as tabulated in Table 1. The structural difference between macro and mesoporous nanocomposite predominantly lies in the porosity aspect since the phases evolved, size and volume percentage of the crystals produced were similar. The mesoporous sample exhibited a BET surface area of 129 m²/g and pore volume of 0.22 cm³/g in contrast to 0.06 m²/g of macroporous sample. It was observed that the concentration of MB chosen (0.03 mM of MB) was completely adsorbed within 10 min. Hence, it was understood that the concentration of MB chosen was not sufficient enough to exhibit photocatalytic activity due to the superior adsorption behavior exhibited by the mesoporous sample. Therefore an intuitive thought process steered to double the concentration (0.06 mM of MB) and subsequently it was observed that the
adsorption-desorption equilibrium was attained after 12 h in dark. The photo-degradation constant was then calculated after visible light exposure and has been reported to be 3.0 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹ which when compared to the degradation constant of macroporous sample (4.7 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹) apparently appears to be low primarily due to the doubled concentration of MB.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 11.** (a) UV-vis absorption spectra for 0.06 mM (with 50 mg of mesoporous nanocomposite (inset: photograph revealing the decolorization of MB); (b) kinetic analysis of the degradation of MB by mesoporous nanocomposite.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Comparison of photodegradation constants of various photocatalysts.</caption><thead><tr><th>Material</th><th>K (10<sup>-3</sup> × min<sup>-1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SiOC</td><td>1.3 [47] (0.03 mM of MB)</td></tr><tr><td>SiOC/TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td>2.2 [47] (0.03 mM of MB)</td></tr><tr><td>SiOC/N-doped TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td>3.4 [47] (0.03 mM of MB)</td></tr><tr><td>Macroporous TiO<sub>2</sub>/SiOC</td><td>4.8 [present work] (0.03 mM of MB)</td></tr><tr><td>Mesoporous TiO<sub>2</sub>/SiOC</td><td>3.0 [present work] (0.06 mM of MB)</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 3.5. Band Gap Measurement

Since both the nanocomposites (macroporous and mesoporous) exhibited visible light photocatalytic activity, diffuse reflectance studies were carried out with the aid of UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS) to comprehend the effect of band gap. The band gap (E<sub>g</sub>) was calculated by the Tauc equation [79–81]

$$ (\alpha h\nu)^n = K(h\nu - E_g) \qquad (4) $$

where α is the absorption coefficient, hν is the photo energy, K is a constant, and n is either 2 for a direct transition or 1/2 for an indirect transition. For TiO₂ (anatase phase), n is taken as 1/2 [82]. Figure 12a,b depicts the UV-vis DRS spectra and the band gap energy calculated from the Tauc plot of macro/mesoporous materials and TiO₂, respectively. The band gap values of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites were found to be 2.75 eV and 2.05 eV, respectively. The shift in optical band gap when compared to commercial TiO₂ is believed to be due to the presence of carbon in the TiO₂ lattice. The organic titanium precursor (TB) used in this study can effectively be a source of titanium, oxygen and carbon to form carbon doped TiO₂. When the organic precursor attains a temperature more than its boiling point, it converts to its vapor form. Since the organic precursor contains carbon and owing to the high affinity of carbon towards Ti, diffusion of carbon into TiO₂ lattice is expected to happen at higher temperatures similar to the observations of Wu et al. on the synthesis of carbon doped TiO₂ using Ti(OC₄H₉)₄ as precursor [83].
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>Figure 12. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra; (b) Tau plot: Namely (αhv)1/2 vs. hv of macro/mesoporous nanocomposites and commercial TiO2.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.6. Bonding Characteristics

FTIR spectroscopy was done on the macroporous nanocomposites to identify the nature of bonds that compose the materials. It has been compared to the FTIR spectrum of the mesoporous sample. In Figure 13, the broad band in the range of 1020 to 1260 cm⁻¹ could be due to the overlapping bands of Si–O–C (1030–1090 cm⁻¹) and Si–O–Si (1120 cm⁻¹) [84]. The bands located at 796 and 468 cm⁻¹ are assigned to Si–C and Ti–O–Ti vibration modes respectively [85]. The absorption bands appearing at 1629 cm⁻¹ in the spectra originates from the vibrations of C=C bonds [86]. The broad band in the range 1250–1050 cm⁻¹ could also be attributed to the presence of Si–O–Si bonds [87]. The bands at 798 cm⁻¹ and 1100 cm⁻¹ is assigned to the presence of Ti–O–C bond [88]. The intensity of peak at 1629 cm⁻¹ which is a characteristic band for C=C, is significantly higher for the mesoporous nanocomposite. This is a consequence of using carbon templates. In addition, the usage of mesoporous carbon template is expected to be beneficial for the formation of Ti–O–C bonds.

Upon heat-treatment in air, the following reaction is expected to happen:

$$ [CH_3(H)SiO]_n + Ti(OCH_2CH_2CH_2CH_3)_4 \rightarrow [Si(O)CH_2]_n + TiO_2 + H_2O \uparrow + 4C_4H_9OH \uparrow $$

To confirm the presence of carbon in the TiO₂ lattice, XPS was carried out. The full survey XPS spectra of macroporous and mesoporous materials show the elemental presence of silicon, titanium, oxygen and carbon (Figure S8a). For macroporous nanocomposite (Figure 14b), the peaks centered at 459.2 eV and 465.2 eV corresponds to Ti (2p₃/₂) and Ti (2p₁/₂), respectively and it could be affirmed that Ti present in the nanocomposites is predominantly Ti⁴⁺. Interestingly, the deconvolution of the Ti peaks of mesoporous nanocomposite resulted in two more peaks other than Ti (2p₃/₂) and Ti (2p₁/₂) at 460.4 and 466.6 eV, which implies the formation of Ti–C bond (Figure 14d) [89].

In the case of mesoporous nanocomposite, presence of Ti–C was revealed in XPS (Figure 14d). It is assumed that since the titania precursor was added to SiOC–C composite, the pyrolysis of this mixture could have resulted in the formation of Ti–C bond besides Ti–O–C. The presence of Ti–C bond was also observed by Akhavan et al. when graphene was incorporated in TiO₂ [89]. The C(1s) spectra of macroporous material could be deconvoluted into two peaks. From Figure 14a,c, the main peak at 284.6 eV is assigned to adventitious elemental carbon whereas the peak at 288.1 eV indicates the presence of Ti–O–C bonds [90]. However, an additional peak was observed in mesoporous nanocomposite at 286.2 eV, which corresponds to the C–O bond. In addition to this, it was observed that the intensity of Ti 2p₃/₂ and Ti 2p₁/₂ of mesoporous nanocomposite was higher in contrast to macroporous nanocomposite. Since XPS is a surface-sensitive quantitative spectroscopic technique, it is
assumed that the amount of TiO₂ nanoparticles exposed on the surface of mesoporous nanocomposite is higher than that of macroporous nanocomposite. The presence of Ti–O–C bonds was observed in both macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposite up on the analysis of C1s peak (Figure 14a,c). XPS studies carried out by Ingo et al. on silica-titania powders assigned an intermediate binding energy value between ~530 eV and ~532 eV to the presence of Si–O–Ti bond [91]. However, the findings also include the breakage of Si–O–Ti bonds upon thermal treatments in air. In the present study, the absence of Si–O–Ti bond was confirmed by the absence of peak at 920 cm⁻¹ in the FTIR spectra in both macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposite (Figure 13).

From the above details, it can be deduced that some of the lattice oxygen atoms may have been substituted by carbon atoms to form a Ti–O–C bond. The introduction of carbon is expected to occur during the heat-treatment/pyrolysis stage. Since Ti atoms have high affinity towards carbon, the diffusion of carbon atoms into the TiO₂ lattice could have occurred at higher temperatures. We also hypothesize that the use of carbon template aids the doping process.

The deconvolution of Si peak in macroporous nanocomposite indicates the presence of SiO₂C₂ (101.9 eV) and Si–O (103.6 eV) bonds in the matrix (Figure S8b). However, in the case of mesoporous nanocomposites, the deconvolution resulted in the presence of a peak at 103.5 eV only suggesting the presence of Si–O bonds at the surface (Figure S8c). In one of the earliest reported literature by Corriu et al. [92] on the deconvolution of Si 2p peak in XPS of SiOC materials obtained from polysiloxane precursors, the spectrum was proposed to fit using five components with binding energy varying between those of SiO₂ and SiC as provided below. SiO₄ (103.5 ± 0.1 eV), SiO₃C (102.74 ± 0.1 eV), SiO₂C₂ (101.9 ± 0.1 eV), SiOC₃ (101.14 ± 0.1 eV), SiC₄ (100.3 ± 0.1 eV). Hence, it is clear that the binding energies varying from 100.3 to 102.7 eV indicate the presence of SiOC. In addition to this, it was also shown by Dire et al. that the stability of Si–C bonds in polysiloxane networks depends on the metal oxide amount added [93]. It was observed from FTIR results that the high reactivity of titanium atoms towards the Si–C bonds apparently results in the cleavage of Si–C bonds during thermal treatments. The assignment of the binding energies from 100.3 to 102.7 eV indicating the presence of SiOC was also reported by Chandra et al. and Halim et al. [94,95].

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 13.** FTIR transmittance spectra of TiO₂/SiOC nanocomposite indicating the bonding characteristics.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 14.** XPS peak deconvolution of C(1s) and Ti(2p): (a,b) in macroporous and (c,d) mesoporous materials.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.7. Photodegradation Mechanism

The photoexcitation of the produced material in visible light could be attributed to the reduction in the band gap. In Figure 12a, the red shift in the absorption spectra is clearly observed. The red shift observed in this study is attributed to the presence of Ti–O–C/Ti–C bond which is also substantiated by the XPS results. It has been observed that the doping of carbon can occur in two ways, i.e., carbon atoms can either substitute the titanium site or the oxygen site. Kamisaka et al. [96] experimentally observed the visible light response of the catalyst when some of the anion lattice was substituted by carbon. It is believed that during the pyrolysis of initial polymers, there is possibility for some of the oxygen atoms in the TiO₂ lattice being substituted by the carbon atoms leading to the formation of TiO₂–2xCₓ[V̄O₂]ₓ', where [V̄O₂]ₓ is the oxide ion vacancy. Electron spin resonance (ESR) investigation was further carried out at room temperature to confirm the presence of oxygen vacancies. Both the macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites exhibited EPR signals at about g = 2.00 as illustrated in Figure S9. The g value clearly indicates the single electron trapped oxygen vacancy [97].

The binding energy of the carbide (2p) band is ~3 eV less when compared to that of O²⁻ (2p) band. Hence, it is believed that the substitution of C⁴⁻ ion should reduce the band gap as the C⁴⁻ (2p) band lies above the O²⁻ (2p) band and the optical transitions happens between the C 2pπ to Ti dxy instead of O 2pπ to Ti dxy (Figure 15) [98].
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 15.** Schematic representation of band gap reduction mechanism and degradation process.</figcaption></figure>

In general, low concentration of dye can only be removed by the photocatalytic degradation process. To treat a highly concentrated dye solution, materials that can contribute to the combinatorial effect of adsorption and photocatalysis is designed and mesoporosity serves that purpose. The photodegradation process is expected to be occurring in two steps. The first step involves the adsorption of MB molecules onto the samples (both in macro and mesoporous nanocomposite), while colossal adsorption occurs in the mesoporous couterparts. Subsequently, upon the illumination of visible light, the active TiO₂ nanocrystals embedded in SiOC matrix gets excited to generate hydroxyl and superoxide radicals. This eventually will lead to the decomposition of MB molecules. The adsorption process only governs the kinetics of the degradation mechanism.

We also hypothesize the effect of heterojunction formation between amorphous SiOC and crystalline TiO₂ to enhance the photocatalytic effect. The heterojunctions formed between the above is expected to reduce the recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pair. Recently, a study has been carried out on the amorphous phase of polymer derived silicon oxycarbide and has reported a band gap value of 2.5 eV. In addition to this, for amorphous SiOCN, the dependence of band gap on the pyrolysis temperature has been studied by Wang et al. [99] and concluded that the band gap decreases with increase in pyrolysis temperature.

As inferred from the work of Zou et al. [100] it is believed that the conduction and valence band potential of SiOC is higher than that of TiO₂. Thus the photogenerated electrons on the surface of SiOC will be transferred to the conduction band of TiO₂, whereas the holes in the valence band of TiO₂ transports to the valence band of SiOC, thereby reducing the recombination rate of the electron-hole pair. A schematic representation of the same is shown in Figure 16.
<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 16.** Schematic diagram of the heterojunction formation between TiO₂ and SiOC.</figcaption></figure>

**4. Conclusions**

In situ TiO₂/SiOC nanocomposites were successfully prepared through a precursor derived route. The heat-treatment/pyrolysis temperature as well as the volume percentage of the starting precursor governs the crystallization of TiO₂ in an amorphous SiOC matrix. The high surface area imparted by the mesoporous structure increased the adsorption capacity of mesoporous nanocomposites. The synthesized nanocomposites exhibited a reduction in band gap when compared to pure titania and considerable photocatalytic activity in the visible light. The formation of Ti-O-C/Ti-C bonds (reduction in band gap) and the heterojunction formed between the crystalline and amorphous phase (reduced recombination rate) is believed to enhance the photocatalytic activity.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/3/362/s1, Figure S1: TGA curve exhibiting the mass loss as a function of temperature for 50 vol % PHMS-TB mixture, Figure S2: X-ray diffractograms of 50 vol % SiOC-TiO₂ as a function of pyrolysis temperature (Anatase-JCPDS card No. 20-2242, Rutile-JCPDS card No. 21-1276, Silica-JCPDS card No. 89-3607), Figure S3: X-ray diffractogram of SiOC-TiO₂ as a function of varying vol % of titanium (n-tetrabutoxide). Pyrolysis was carried out at 1200 °C, Figure S4: Rietveld refinement of (a) macroporous and (b) mesoporous nanocomposite using MAUD software, Figure S5: (a) SEM and (b) TEM micrographs of mesoporous carbon, Figure S6: SAED pattern of (a) macroporous and (b) mesoporous nanocomposites, Figure S7: (a) X-ray diffractogram revealing the presence of crystalline anatase phase (b) particle size distribution histogram and (c) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption curve of commercial TiO₂, Figure S8: XPS (a) full survey spectra indicating the presence of Si, Ti, O and C (b) Si2p macroporous and (c) Si2p mesoporous nanocomposites, Figure S9: EPR spectra of macroporous and mesoporous SiOC/TiO₂ clearly indicating the presence of vacancies, Table S1: Comparison of Raman vibrational modes of macroporous and mesoporous nanocomposites with single crystal anatase.

**Acknowledgments:** We would like to acknowledge the CEFIPRA agency (project No. 5108-1) for funding this work.
**Author Contributions:** The experiments were conducted and manuscript was written by Eranezhuth Wasan Awin. Abhijeet Lale, Kollamala Chellappan Nair Hari Kumar and Samuel Bernard helped in the analysis of experimental results. Umit Bilge Demirci assisted in the analysis of photodegradation results. Ravi Kumar conceived the idea and designed the experiments. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

**Conflicts of Interest:** There are no conflicts to declare.

## References

1. Soraru, G.D.; Andrea, G.D.; Glisenti, A. XPS Characterization of Gel-Derived Silicon Oxycarbide Glasses. *Mater. Lett.* **1996**, *27*, 1–5. [CrossRef]

2. Du, P.; Wang, X.; Lin, I.-K.; Zhang, X. Effects of Composition and Thermal Annealing on the Mechanical Properties of Silicon Oxycarbide Films. *Sens. Actuators A Phys.* **2012**, *176*, 90–98. [CrossRef]

3. Sorarù, G.D.; Pederiva, L.; Latournerie, J.; Raj, R. Pyrolysis Kinetics for the Conversion of a Polymer into an Amorphous Silicon Oxycarbide Ceramic. *J. Am. Ceram. Soc.* **2002**, *85*, 2181–2187. [CrossRef]

4. Xu, T.; Ma, Q.; Chen, Z. High-Temperature Behavior of Silicon Oxycarbide Glasses in Air Environment. *Ceram. Int.* **2011**, *37*, 2555–2559. [CrossRef]

5. Narisawa, M.; Ryu'ichi, S.; Ken'ichiro, K. Evaluation of Oxidation Resistance of Thin Continuous Silicon Oxycarbide Fiber Derived from Silicone Resin with Low Carbon Content. *J. Mater. Sci.* **2010**, *45*, 5642–5648. [CrossRef]

6. Ionescu, E.; Kleebe, H.J.; Riedel, R. Silicon-Containing Polymer-Derived Ceramic Nanocomposites (PDC-NCs): Preparative Approaches and Properties. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2012**, *41*, 5032–5052. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. *Nature* **1972**, *238*, 37–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8. Fox, M.A.; Dulay, M.T. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. *Chem. Rev.* **1993**, *93*, 341–357. [CrossRef]

9. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. *Chem. Rev.* **1995**, *95*, 69–96. [CrossRef]

10. O'Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO₂ Films. *Nature* **1991**, *353*, 737–740. [CrossRef]

11. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Kay, A.; Rodicio, I.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Mueller, E.; Liska, P.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Graetzel, M. Conversion of Light to Electricity by Cis-X₂bis(2,2'-bipyridyl-4,4'-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) Charge-Transfer Sensitizers (X = Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, CN⁻, and SCN⁻) on Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide Electrodes. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **1993**, *115*, 6382–6390. [CrossRef]

12. Barbé, C.J.; Arendse, F.; Comte, P.; Jirousek, M.; Lenzmann, F.; Shklover, V.; Grätzel, M. Nanocrystalline Titanium Oxide Electrodes for Photovoltaic Applications. *J. Am. Ceram. Soc.* **2005**, *80*, 3157–3171. [CrossRef]

13. Hu, Y.; Tsai, H.-L.; Huang, C.-L. Effect of Brookite Phase on the Anatase–rutile Transition in Titania Nanoparticles. *J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.* **2003**, *23*, 691–696. [CrossRef]

14. Aguado, J.; van Grieken, R.; López-Muñoz, M.; Marugán, J. Removal of Cyanides in Wastewater by Supported TiO₂-Based Photocatalysts. *Catal. Today* **2002**, *75*, 95–102. [CrossRef]

15. Dong, H.; Zeng, G.; Tang, L.; Fan, C.; Zhang, C.; He, X.; He, Y. An Overview on Limitations of TiO₂-Based Particles for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and the Corresponding Countermeasures. *Water Res.* **2015**, *79*, 128–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Irie, H.; Watanabe, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Carbon-Doped Anatase TiO₂ Powders as a Visible-Light Sensitive Photocatalyst. *Chem. Lett.* **2003**, *32*, 772–773. [CrossRef]

17. Sakthivel, S.; Kisch, H. Daylight Photocatalysis by Carbon-Modified Titanium Dioxide. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2003**, *42*, 4908–4911. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18. Czoska, A.M.; Livraghi, S.; Chiesa, M.; Giamello, E.; Agnoli, S.; Granozzi, G.; Finazzi, E.; Di Valentin, C.; Pacchioni, G. The Nature of Defects in Fluorine-Doped TiO₂. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2008**, *112*, 8951–8956. [CrossRef]

19. Mizukoshi, Y.; Ohtsu, N.; Semboshi, S.; Masahashi, N. Visible Light Responses of Sulfur-Doped Rutile Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts Fabricated by Anodic Oxidation. *Appl. Catal. B Environ.* **2009**, *91*, 152–156. [CrossRef]
20. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxides. *Science* **2001**, *293*, 269–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. Xie, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, X. Low-Temperature Preparation and Visible-Light-Induced Catalytic Activity of Anatase F-N-Codoped TiO₂. *J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.* **2007**, *277*, 119–126. [CrossRef]

22. Liu, S.; Yu, J.; Wang, W.; Rodriguez, J.A.; Sanz, J.F.; Cappelletti, G.; Bianchi, C.L.; Lu, G.Q. Effects of Annealing on the Microstructures and Photoactivity of Fluorinated N-Doped TiO₂. *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.* **2010**, *12*, 12308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Etacheri, V.; Seery, M.K.; Hinder, S.J.; Pillai, S.C. Oxygen Rich Titania: A Dopant Free, High Temperature Stable, and Visible-Light Active Anatase Photocatalyst. *Adv. Funct. Mater.* **2011**, *21*, 3744–3752. [CrossRef]

24. Serpone, N. Is the Band Gap of Pristine TiO₂ Narrowed by Anion- and Cation-Doping of Titanium Dioxide in Second-Generation Photocatalysts? *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2006**, *110*, 24287–24293. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Deng, Q.R.; Xia, X.H.; Guo, M.L.; Gao, Y.; Shao, G. Mn-Doped TiO₂ Nanopowders with Remarkable Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. *Mater. Lett.* **2011**, *65*, 2051–2054. [CrossRef]

26. Gomathi Devi, L.; Narasimha Murthy, B. Characterization of Mo Doped TiO₂ and Its Enhanced Photo Catalytic Activity Under Visible Light. *Catal. Lett.* **2008**, *125*, 320–330. [CrossRef]

27. Ould-Chikh, S.; Proux, O.; Afanasiev, P.; Khrouz, L.; Hedhili, M.N.; Anjum, D.H.; Harb, M.; Geantet, C.; Basset, J.-M.; Puzenat, E. Photocatalysis with Chromium-Doped TiO₂: Bulk and Surface Doping. *ChemSusChem* **2014**, *7*, 1361–1371. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28. Khurana, C.; Pandey, O.P.; Chudasama, B. Synthesis of Visible Light-Responsive Cobalt-Doped TiO₂ Nanoparticles with Tunable Optical Band Gap. *J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.* **2015**, *75*, 424–435. [CrossRef]

29. Kim, S.; Hwang, S.-J.; Choi, W. Visible Light Active Platinum-Ion-Doped TiO₂ Photocatalyst. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2005**, *109*, 24260–24267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30. Wetchakun, N.; Pirakitikulr, P.; Chiang, K.; Phanichphant, S. Visible Light-Active Nano-Sized Fe-Doped TiO₂ Photocatalysts and Their Characterization. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Nanoelectronics Conference, Shanghai, China, 24–27 March 2008; pp. 836–841.

31. Ohno, T.; Tanigawa, F.; Fujihara, K.; Izumi, S.; Matsumura, M. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Water by Visible Light Using Ruthenium-Doped Titanium Dioxide Powder. *J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.* **1999**, *127*, 107–110. [CrossRef]

32. Yu, Y.; Wen, W.; Qian, X.-Y.; Liu, J.-B.; Wu, J.-M. UV and Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Au/TiO₂ Nanoforests with Anatase/Rutile Phase Junctions and Controlled Au Locations. *Sci. Rep.* **2017**, *7*, 41253. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Michalow, K.A.; Vital, A.; Heel, A.; Graule, T.; Reifler, F.A.; Ritter, A.; Zakrzewska, K.; Rekas, M. Photocatalytic Activity of W-Doped TiO₂ Nanopowders. *J. Adv. Oxid. Technol.* **2008**, *11*, 56–64. [CrossRef]

34. Wu, T.; Lin, T.; Zhao, J.; Hidaka, H.; Serpone, N. TiO₂-Assisted Photodegradation of Dyes. 9. Photooxidation of a Squarylium Cyanine Dye in Aqueous Dispersions under Visible Light Irradiation. *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **1999**, *33*, 1379–1387. [CrossRef]

35. Wu, T.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Hidaka, H.; Serpone, N. Photoassisted Degradation of Dye Pollutants. V. Self-Photosensitized Oxidative Transformation of Rhodamine B under Visible Light Irradiation in Aqueous TiO₂ Dispersions. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **1998**, *102*, 5845–5851. [CrossRef]

36. Xu, Y.; Langford, C.H. UV- or Visible-Light-Induced Degradation of X3B on TiO₂ Nanoparticles: The Influence of Adsorption. *Langmuir* **2001**, *17*, 897–902. [CrossRef]

37. Marci, G.; Augugliaro, V.; López-Muñoz, M.J.; Martín, C.; Palmisano, L.; Rives, V.; Schiavello, M.; Tilley, R.J.D.; Venezuela, A.M. Preparation Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of Polycrystalline ZnO/TiO₂ Systems. 1. Surface and Bulk Characterization. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2001**, *105*, 1026–1032. [CrossRef]

38. Brahimi, R.; Bessekhouad, Y.; Bouguelia, A.; Trari, M. Visible Light Induced Hydrogen Evolution over the Heterosystem Bi₂S₃/TiO₂. *Catal. Today* **2007**, *122*, 62–65. [CrossRef]

39. Dong, W.; Lee, C.W.; Lu, X.; Sun, Y.; Hua, W.; Zhuang, G.; Zhang, S.; Chen, J.; Hou, H.; Zhao, D. Synchronous Role of Coupled Adsorption and Photocatalytic Oxidation on Ordered Mesoporous Anatase TiO₂-SiO₂ Nanocomposites Generating Excellent Degradation Activity of RhB Dye. *Appl. Catal. B Environ.* **2010**, *95*, 197–207. [CrossRef]

40. Yoneyama, H.; Torimoto, T. Titanium Dioxide/adsorbent Hybrid Photocatalysts for Photodestruction of Organic Substances of Dilute Concentrations. *Catal. Today* **2000**, *58*, 133–140. [CrossRef]
41. Xu, D.; Huang, Z.-H.; Kang, F.; Inagaki, M.; Ko, T.-H. Effect of Heat Treatment on Adsorption Performance and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO₂-Mounted Activated Carbon Cloths. *Catal. Today* **2008**, *139*, 64–68. [CrossRef]

42. Gómez-Solís, C.; Juárez-Ramírez, I.; Moctezuma, E.; Torres-Martínez, L.M. Photodegradation of Indigo Carmine and Methylene Blue Dyes in Aqueous Solution by SiC–TiO₂ Catalysts Prepared by Sol–gel. *J. Hazard. Mater.* **2012**, *217*, 194–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Kouamé, N.A.; Robert, D.; Keller, V.; Keller, N.; Pham, C.; Nguyen, P. Preliminary Study of the Use of β-SiC Foam as a Photocatalytic Support for Water Treatment. *Catal. Today* **2011**, *161*, 3–7. [CrossRef]

44. Liu, Y.; Xin, F.; Wang, F.; Luo, S.; Yin, X. Synthesis, Characterization, and Activities of Visible Light-Driven Bi₂O₃–TiO₂ Composite Photocatalysts. *J. Alloys Compd.* **2010**, *498*, 179–184. [CrossRef]

45. He, J.; Cai, Q.Z.; Ji, Y.G.; Luo, H.H.; Li, D.J.; Yu, B. Influence of Fluorine on the Structure and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO₂ Film Prepared in Tungstate-Electrolyte via Micro-Arc Oxidation. *J. Alloys Compd.* **2009**, *482*, 476–481. [CrossRef]

46. Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Pan, C. "In Situ" Preparation of a TiO₂/Eu₂O₃ Composite Film upon Ti Alloy Substrate by Micro-Arc Oxidation and Its Photo-Catalytic Property. *J. Alloys Compd.* **2012**, *538*, 16–20. [CrossRef]

47. Hojamberdiev, M.; Prasad, R.M.; Morita, K.; Zhu, Y.; Schiavon, M.A.; Gurlo, A.; Riedel, R. Template-Free Synthesis of Polymer-Derived Mesoporous SiOC/TiO₂ and SiOC/N-Doped TiO₂ Ceramic Composites for Application in the Removal of Organic Dyes from Contaminated Water. *Appl. Catal. B Environ.* **2012**, *115*, 303–313. [CrossRef]

48. Li, Z.; Hou, B.; Xu, Y.; Wu, D.; Sun, Y. Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Performance of Silica-Modified Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. *J. Colloid Interface Sci.* **2005**, *288*, 149–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

49. Andersson, M.; Osterlund, L.; Ljungstrom, S.; Palmqvist, A. Preparation of Nanosize Anatase and Rutile TiO₂ by Hydrothermal Treatment of Microemulsions and Their Activity for Photocatalytic Wet Oxidation of Phenol. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2002**, *106*, 10674–10679. [CrossRef]

50. Yu, J.C.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, Z.; Zhao, J. Synthesis and Characterization of Phosphated Mesoporous Titanium Dioxide with High Photocatalytic Activity. *Chem. Mater.* **2003**, *15*, 2280–2286. [CrossRef]

51. Elder, S.H.; Gao, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; McCready, D.E.; Windisch, C.F. Zirconia-Stabilized 25-Å TiO₂ Anatase Crystallites in a Mesoporous Structure. *Chem. Mater.* **1998**, *10*, 3140–3145. [CrossRef]

52. Ovenstone, J.; Yanagisawa, K. Effect of Hydrothermal Treatment of Amorphous Titania on the Phase Change from Anatase to Rutile during Calcination. *Chem. Mater.* **1999**, *11*, 2770–2774. [CrossRef]

53. Colombo, P.; Mera, G.; Riedel, R.; Soraru, G.D. Polymer-Derived Ceramics: 40 Years of Research and Innovation in Advanced Ceramics. *J. Am. Ceram. Soc.* **2010**, *93*, 1805–1837. [CrossRef]

54. Colombo, P. (Ed.) *Polymer Derived Ceramics: From Nano-Structure to Applications*; DEStech Publications: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2010.

55. Mera, G.; Gallei, M.; Bernard, S.; Ionescu, E. Ceramic Nanocomposites from Tailor-Made Preceramic Polymers. *Nanomaterials* **2015**, *5*, 468–540. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56. Viard, A.; Miele, P.; Bernard, S. Polymer-Derived Ceramics Route toward SiCN and SiBCN Fibers: From Chemistry of Polycarbosilazanes to the Design and Characterization of Ceramic Fibers. *J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn.* **2016**, *124*, 967–980. [CrossRef]

57. Bechelany, M.C.; Proust, V.; Gervais, C.; Ghisleni, R.; Bernard, S.; Miele, P. In Situ Controlled Growth of Titanium Nitride in Amorphous Silicon Nitride: A General Route Toward Bulk Nitride Nanocomposites with Very High Hardness. *Adv. Mater.* **2014**, *26*, 6548–6553. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

58. Bechelany, M.C.; Proust, V.; Lale, A.; Miele, P.; Malo, S.; Gervais, C.; Bernard, S. Nanocomposites through the Chemistry of Single-Source Precursors: Understanding the Role of Chemistry behind the Design of Monolith-Type Nanostructured Titanium Nitride/Silicon Nitride. *Chem. A Eur. J.* **2017**, *23*, 832–845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

59. Kaspar, J.; Terzioglu, C.; Ionescu, E.; Graczyk-Zajac, M.; Hapis, S.; Kleebe, H.-J.; Riedel, R. Stable SiOC/Sn Nanocomposite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Outstanding Cycling Stability. *Adv. Funct. Mater.* **2014**, *24*, 4097–4104. [CrossRef]

60. Wen, Q.; Xu, Y.; Xu, B.; Fasel, C.; Guillon, O.; Buntkowsky, G.; Yu, Z.; Riedel, R.; Ionescu, E. Single-source-precursor synthesis of dense SiC/HfCₓN₁₋ₓ-based ultrahigh-temperature ceramic nanocomposites. *Nanoscale* **2014**, *6*, 13678–13689. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Zaheer, M.; Schmalz, T.; Motz, G.; Kempe, R. Polymer Derived Non-Oxide Ceramics Modified with Late Transition Metals. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2012**, *41*, 5102–5116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

62. Lutterotti, L.; Matthies, S.; Wenk, H.R. MAUD: A Friendly Java Program for Material Analysis Using Diffraction. *CPD Newsl.* **1999**, *21*, 14–15.

63. Byrne, C.; Fagan, R.; Hinder, S.; McCormack, D.; Pillai, S. New Approach of Modifying the Anatase to Rutile Transition Temperature in TiO₂ Photocatalysts. *RSC Adv.* **2016**, *6*, 95232–95238. [CrossRef]

64. Hurum, D.C.; Agrios, A.G.; Gray, K.A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M.C. Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO₂ Using EPR. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2003**, *107*, 4545–4549. [CrossRef]

65. Shao, X.; Lu, W.; Zhang, R.; Pan, F. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of TiO₂-C Hybrid Aerogels for Methylene Blue Degradation. *Sci. Rep.* **2013**. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Zhang, W.F.; He, Y.L.; Zhang, M.S.; Yin, Z.; Chen, Q. Raman Scattering Study on Anatase TiO₂ Nanocrystals. *J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.* **2000**, *33*, 912–916. [CrossRef]

67. Ferrari, A.C. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and Graphite: Disorder, Electron–Phonon Coupling, Doping and Nonadiabatic Effects. *Solid State Commun.* **2007**, *143*, 47–57. [CrossRef]

68. Duan, L.; Ma, Q. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Pore Structure Evolution of Polysiloxane-Derived Ceramics. *Ceram. Int.* **2012**, *38*, 2667–2671. [CrossRef]

69. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. *Pure Appl. Chem.* **1985**, *57*, 603–619. [CrossRef]

70. Rouquerol, J.; Avnir, D.; Fairbridge, C.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haynes, J.M.; Pernicone, N.; Ramsay, J.D.F.; Sing, K.S.W.; Unger, K.K. Recommendations for the Characterization of Porous Solids. *Pure Appl. Chem.* **1994**, *66*, 1739–1758. [CrossRef]

71. Grosman, A.; Ortega, C. Nature of Capillary Condensation and Evaporation Processes in Ordered Porous Materials. *Langmuir* **2005**, *21*, 10515–10521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

72. Matos, J.R.; Kruk, M.; Mercuri, L.P.; Jaroniec, M.; Zhao, L.; Kamiyama, T.; Terasaki, O.; Pinnavaia, T.J.; Liu, Y. Ordered Mesoporous Silica with Large Cage-Like Pores: Structural Identification and Pore Connectivity Design by Controlling the Synthesis Temperature and Time. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2003**, *125*, 821–829. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

73. Tang, J.; Zou, Z.; Ye, J. Efficient Photocatalysis on BaBiO₃ Driven by Visible Light. *Phys. Chem. C* **2007**, *111*, 12779–12785. [CrossRef]

74. Tang, J.; Zou, Z.; Ye, J. Efficient Photocatalytic Decomposition of Organic Contaminants over CaBi₂O₄ under Visible-Light Irradiation. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2004**, *43*, 4463–4466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

75. Kumar, K.V.; Porkodi, K.; Rocha, F. Langmuir–Hinshelwood Kinetics—A Theoretical Study. *Catal. Commun.* **2008**, *9*, 82–84. [CrossRef]

76. Wang, R.; Cai, X.; Shen, F. TiO₂ Hollow Microspheres with Mesoporous Surface: Superior Adsorption Performance for Dye Removal. *Appl. Surf. Sci.* **2014**, *305*, 352–358. [CrossRef]

77. Ho, Y.; McKay, G. Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes. *Process Biochem.* **1999**, *34*, 451–465. [CrossRef]

78. Han, S.; Liu, K.; Hu, L.; Teng, F.; Yu, P.; Zhu, Y. Superior Adsorption and Regenerable Dye Adsorbent Based on Flower-Like Molybdenum Disulfide Nanostructure. *Sci. Rep.* **2017**, *7*, 43599. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

79. Chen, L.; Yin, S.-F.; Luo, S.-L.; Huang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Hong, T.; Au, P.C.T. Bi₂O₂CO₃/BiOI Photocatalysts with Heterojunctions Highly Efficient for Visible-Light Treatment of Dye-Containing Wastewater. *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.* **2012**, *51*, 6760–6768. [CrossRef]

80. Huang, H.; He, Y.; Lin, Z.; Kang, L.; Zhang, Y. Two Novel Bi-Based Borate Photocatalysts: Crystal Structure, Electronic Structure, Photoelectrochemical Properties, and Photocatalytic Activity under Simulated Solar Light Irradiation. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2013**, *117*, 22986–22994. [CrossRef]

81. Kumar, A.; Sharma, G.; Naushad, M.; Singh, P.; Kalia, S. Polyacrylamide/Ni₀.₀₂Zn₀.₉₈O Nanocomposite with High Solar Light Photocatalytic Activity and Efficient Adsorption Capacity for Toxic Dye Removal. *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.* **2014**, *53*, 15549–15560. [CrossRef]

82. Reddy, K.M.; Manorama, S.V.; Reddy, A.R. Bandgap Studies on Anatase Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. *Mater. Chem. Phys.* **2003**, *78*, 239–245. [CrossRef]

83. Wu, G.; Nishikawa, T.; Ohtani, B.; Chen, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon-Doped TiO₂ Nanostructures with Enhanced Visible Light Response. *Chem. Mater.* **2007**, *19*, 4530–4537. [CrossRef]
84. Kaspar, J.; Storch, M.; Schitco, C.; Riedel, R.; Graczyk-Zajac, M. SiOC(N)/Hard Carbon Composite Anodes for Na-Ion Batteries: Influence of Morphology on the Electrochemical Properties. *J. Electrochem. Soc.* **2016**, *163*, A156-A162. [CrossRef]

85. Lui, G.; Liao, J.Y.; Duan, A.; Zhang, Z.; Fowler, M.; Yu, A. Graphene-Wrapped Hierarchical TiO₂ Nanoflower Composites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. *J. Mater. Chem. A* **2013**, *1*, 12255-12262. [CrossRef]

86. Meng, L.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Su, K.; Kong, J. Hierarchically Porous Silicon-Carbon-Nitrogen Hybrid Materials towards Highly Efficient and Selective Adsorption of Organic Dyes. *Sci. Rep.* **2015**, *5*, 7910. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

87. Li, J.; Lu, K. Highly Porous SiOC Bulk Ceramics with Water Vapor Assisted Pyrolysis. *J. Am. Ceram. Soc.* **2015**, *98*, 2357-2365. [CrossRef]

88. Wang, S.; Zhou, S. Photodegradation of Methyl Orange by Photocatalyst of CNTs/P-TiO₂ under UV and Visible-Light Irradiation. *J. Hazard. Mater.* **2011**, *185*, 77-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

89. Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E.; Rahimi, K. Adverse Effects of Graphene Incorporated in TiO₂ Photocatalyst on Minuscule Animals under Solar Light Irradiation. *J. Mater. Chem.* **2012**, *22*, 23260-23266. [CrossRef]

90. Zhang, Y.; Pan, C. TiO₂/graphene Composite from Thermal Reaction of Graphene Oxide and Its Photocatalytic Activity in Visible Light. *J. Mater. Sci.* **2011**, *46*, 2622-2626. [CrossRef]

91. Ingo, G.M.; Dire, S.; Babonneau, F. XPS studies of SiO₂-TiO₂ powders prepared by sol-gel process. *Appl. Surf. Sci.* **1993**, *70*, 230-234. [CrossRef]

92. Corriu, R.J.P.; Leclercq, D.; Mutin, P.H.; Vioux, A. Preparation and Structure of Silicon Oxycarbide Glasses Derived from Polysiloxane Precursors. *J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.* **1997**, *8*, 327-330. [CrossRef]

93. Dire, S.; Ceccato, R. Structural and Microstructural Evolution during Pyrolysis of Hybrid Polydimethylsiloxane-Titania Nanocomposites. *J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.* **2005**, *34*, 53-62. [CrossRef]

94. Chandra, C.; Kim, J. Silicon Oxycarbide Produced from Silicone Oil for High-Performance Anode Material in Sodium Ion Batteries. *J. Chem. Eng.* **2018**, *338*, 126-136. [CrossRef]

95. Halim, M.; Hudaya, C.; Kim, A.Y.; Lee, J.K. Phenyl-Rich Silicone Oil as a Precursor for SiOC Anode Materials for Long-Cycle and High-Rate Lithium Ion Batteries. *J. Mater. Chem. A* **2016**, *4*, 2651-2656.

96. Kamisaka, H.; Adachi, T.; Yamashita, K. Theoretical Study of the Structure and Optical Properties of Carbon-Doped Rutile and Anatase Titanium Oxides. *J. Chem. Phys.* **2005**, *123*, 084704. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

97. Yijun, Y.; Dawei, N.; Ye, Y.; Yeteng, Z.; Ying, M.; Jiannian, Y. High photocatalytic activity of carbon doped TiO₂ prepared by fast combustion of organic capping ligands. *RSC Adv.* **2015**, *5*, 93635-93643.

98. Nagaveni, K.; Hegde, M.S.; Ravishankar, N.; Subbanna, G.N.; Madras, G. Synthesis and Structure of Nanocrystalline TiO₂ with Lower Band Gap Showing High Photocatalytic Activity. *Langmuir* **2004**, *20*, 2900-2907. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

99. Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; Feng, W.; An, L. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Piezoresistivity of Polymer-Derived Ceramics. *J. Am. Ceram. Soc.* **2011**, *94*, 359-362. [CrossRef]

100. Zou, T.; Xie, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, S. Full Mineralization of Toluene by Photocatalytic Degradation with Porous TiO₂/SiC Nanocomposite Film. *J. Alloys Compd.* **2013**, *552*, 504-510. [CrossRef]

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>