# Bipyrrole boomerangs via Pd-mediated tandem cyclization-oxygenation. Controlling reaction selectivity and electronic properties

Liliia Moshniaha, Marika Zyia-Karwowska, Joanna Cybinska, Piotr J. Chmielewski, Ludovic Favereau, Marcin Stepien

► To cite this version:

Liliia Moshniaha, Marika Zyia-Karwowska, Joanna Cybinska, Piotr J. Chmielewski, Ludovic Favereau, et al., Bipyrrole boomerangs via Pd-mediated tandem cyclization-oxygenation. Controlling reaction selectivity and electronic properties. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2020, 16, pp.895-903. 10.3762/bjoc.16.81. hal-02797043

HAL Id: hal-02797043

https://univ-rennes.hal.science/hal-02797043

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Bipyrrole boomerangs via Pd-mediated tandem cyclization–oxygenation. Controlling reaction selectivity and electronic properties

Liliia Moshniaha¹, Marika Żyła-Karwowska¹, Joanna Cybińska¹,², Piotr J. Chmielewski¹, Ludovic Favereau³ and Marcin Stępień*¹

Full Research Paper

Open Access

Address:

¹Wydział Chemii, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, ul. F. Joliot-Curie 14,
50-383 Wrocław, Poland, ²PORT - Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju
Technologii, ul. Stablowicka 147, 54-066 Wrocław, Poland and

³Université Rennes, CNRS, ISCR (Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes) UMR 6226, F-35000 Rennes, France

Email:

Marcin Stepień* - marcin.stepien@chem.uni.wroc.pl

Keywords:

donor–acceptor systems; double C–H bond activation; helicenes; pyrroles

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. **2020**, *16*, 895–903.
doi:10.3762/bjoc.16.81

Received: 11 February 2020

Accepted: 17 April 2020

Published: 04 May 2020

This article is part of the thematic issue "C–H functionalization for materials science".

Guest Editor: K. Itami

© 2020 Moshniaha et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.

License and terms: see end of document.

## Abstract

Boomerang-shaped bipyrroles containing donor–acceptor units were obtained through a tandem palladium-mediated reaction consisting of a cyclization step, involving double C–H bond activation, and a double α-oxygenation. The latter reaction can be partly suppressed for the least reactive systems, providing access to α-unsubstituted boomerangs for the first time. These “α-free” systems are highly efficient fluorophores, with emission quantum yields exceeding 80% in toluene. Preliminary measurements show that helicene-like boomerangs may be usable as circularly polarized luminescent materials.

## Introduction

Nanographenes and other polycyclic aromatics as well as their heterocyclic analogues are typically obtained by tandem cyclodehydrogenations of oligoaryl precursors [1-3]. This general strategy is attractive because it does not require prefunctionalization of coupling sites and because it provides rapid access to complex π systems. Such cyclodehydrogenations can be performed using diverse oxidants [4], with $FeCl_3$

being particularly notable for its versatility, ease of use, and low price [5]. Nevertheless, the synthetic utility of oxidative couplings is often limited by several factors [6]. Consequently, incomplete ring fusion and various side reactions, e.g., chlorination [7], or unexpected rearrangements, are frequently observed [8]. The use of oxidative couplings is further limited for the synthesis of strained [9,10], electron-deficient, or sterically

<footnote>* Corresponding author</footnote>
congested aromatics [11-14]. Some of these limitations can be overcome by using prefunctionalized precursors [11], as exemplified by reductive Ullmann-type chemistry [15], catalytic direct arylations [11,14,16,17], photoinduced cyclodehydrochlorinations [18,19], or nucleophilic oxidative couplings [20], which may offer milder reaction conditions and superior regioselectivities, at the expense of atom and step economy [21]. The latter disadvantage may be obviated by transition-metal-mediated double C–H bond activation [22,23], which is functionally equivalent to conventional oxidative coupling reactions, and has become a powerful synthetic tool with a rapidly growing scope of use [24-26]. However, in the field of π-conjugated materials, this strategy has so far remained relatively unexplored [27].

As a part of our ongoing research on π-extended electron-deficient oligopyrroles [13,28-31], we have recently reported that Pd(II)-mediated double C–H activation can be a useful tool for conversion of 1,*n*-dipyrrolylalkanes into boomerang-shaped N,*N*'-bridged α,α'-bipyrroles that are not accessible by means of conventional oxidative coupling methods (Scheme 1) [32]. Our approach is applicable to electron-deficient and sterically encumbered systems, notably those based on pyrrole derivatives fused with naphthalenediamide (NDA) and naphthalenemonoimide (NMI) moieties. The double C–H bond activation initially used palladium(II) acetate in acetic acid as the coupling system. The subsequent screening revealed, however, that a catalytic coupling could be also achieved in the presence of

silver(I) carbonate as the stoichiometric oxidant. The scope of such Pd(II)-induced couplings was further developed into tandem processes involving consecutive cyclization of substituents (*dcTT*<sup>EE</sup>) and oxygenation of pyrrolic α-positions to form lactams *cNDA1*<sup>O</sup> and *cNMII*<sup>O</sup>. The mechanism of those transformations was subsequently explored using NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations [33]. In particular, the unprecedented double α-oxygenation of bipyrroles was shown to occur through stepwise acetoxylation, which we found to compete with α-α oligomerization. These new bipyrrole boomerangs exhibited enhanced fluorescence with Φ<sub>fl</sub> values of up to 67%, while their bandgaps and chiroptical responses could be tuned by twisting the bipyrrole chromophore. The solvatochromism and apparent superradiance of these chromophores indicated a potential involvement of solvent-induced symmetry-breaking charge transfer in the excited state [34]. Here we report that the above Pd-mediated chemistry is capable of producing highly twisted dilactam boomerangs and provide first examples of α-free boomerang systems. These new derivatives are of interest as emitters for both polarized and unpolarized luminescence.

## Results and Discussion

### Synthesis

The starting 1,*n*-dipyrrolylalkane precursors (*Rn*<sup>H</sup>, *n* = 2 or 3) were synthesized by reacting the appropriate pyrrolyl anions with either ethylene ditosylate or 1,3-dibromopropane (Scheme S1, Supporting Information File 1). In our initial coupling experiments, 1,2-dipyrrolylethanes (*NDA2*<sup>H</sup>, *NMI2*<sup>H</sup>) and 1,3-

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1:** The previously reported family of the boomerang bipyrroles obtained by Pd-induced double C–H bond activation [32].</figcaption></figure>
dipyrrolylpropanes (NDA3H, NMI3H) were reacted with palla-
dium(II) acetate in acetic acid to furnish the expected bipyrrole
dilactams in 43–53% yields (Table 1, entries 1, 6, 11 and 17).
Remarkably, it was found that cNMI2O and cNMI3O were ob-
tained along with the intermediate α-unsubstituted boomerangs,
cNMI2H and cNMI3H, respectively (Scheme 2). Analogous
α-unsubstituted intermediates (cNDA2H and cNDA3H) were not
isolated in reactions involving NDA2H and NDA3H. The latter
behavior is consistent with the selectivity pattern observed pre-
viously for α-unsubstituted dipyrrolylmethanes NDA1H and
NMIIH, for which we were only able to isolate the correspond-

ing dilactams cNDA1O and cNMII O, respectively [32]. Tran-
sient formation of cNDA1H could, however, be observed in situ
for reactions involving NDA1H [33].

Subsequent screening revealed that the yield of cNMII2H and cNMII3H could be increased when reactions were performed in more dilute solutions (Table 1, entries 14 and 20). Following our previous experimental and computational findings [32,33], we also checked whether the yields of dilactam products might be improved by increasing the concentration of acetate anions in the reaction mixture. Indeed, annulations of NDA*H and

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 2:** Synthesis and structures of α-free and α-oxygenated bipyrrole boomerangs. Reagents and conditions: (a) 30 mM in AcOH, 3 equiv Pd(OAc)₂, 6 equiv KOAc, 120 °C, 1 h; (b) 3 mM in AcOH, 3 equiv Pd(OAc)₂, 120 °C, 1 h. Isolated yields are given for each set of conditions. M enantiomers are depicted for cNDA3O, cNMII3O, cNMII3H. n.d. = not determined.</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1:** Screening of reaction conditions.ª</caption><thead><tr><th>entry</th><th>reactant</th><th>c [mM]<sup>b</sup></th><th>Pd(OAc)<sub>2</sub><sup>c</sup></th><th>additive<sup>d</sup></th><th>cRn<sup>O</sup> [%]<sup>e</sup></th><th>cRn<sup>H</sup> [%]<sup>e</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>NDA2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>46</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>NDA2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>53</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>NDA2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>34</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>NDA2<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>n.d.<sup>f</sup></td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>NDA2<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>n.d.<sup>f</sup></td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>NDA3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>43</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>NDA3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>64</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>NDA3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>37</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>NDA3<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>18</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>NDA3<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>23</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>52</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>60</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>43</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>14</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>32</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>NMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>0.1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>&lt;10%</td><td>&lt;10%</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>56</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>73</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>30</td><td>1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>34</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>none</td><td>16</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>KOAc</td><td>15</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>NMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>3</td><td>0.1</td><td>Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></td><td>19</td><td>traces</td></tr></tbody></table>

NMIn<sup>H</sup> carried out in the presence of 6 equiv of potassium acetate produced the corresponding dilactams in higher yields (53–73%) with complete conversion (Table 1, entries 2, 7, 12, and 18). Under these conditions, the cNM12<sup>H</sup> and cNM13<sup>H</sup> intermediates were not isolated. When the same reactions were, however, performed in higher dilution, the yields decreased and the cNM1n<sup>O</sup> to cNM1n<sup>H</sup> ratio was almost 1:1, showing the important role of the dipyrolylalkane concentration in these transformations (Table 1, entries 15 and 21). Additional experiments carried out on Rn<sup>H</sup> precursors revealed that the coupling and α-oxygenation can also be achieved with 1 equiv of Pd(OAc)<sub>2</sub> in the presence of 2 equiv of silver carbonate. Nevertheless, Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> oxidation provided lower yields and the efficiency of this variant was dramatically diminished when the loading of palladium(II) acetate was decreased below 1 equiv (Table 1, entries 16 and 22).

## Structure

The identity of the α-oxygenated products, cRn<sup>O</sup>, was determined on the basis of high-resolution mass spectrometry and ¹H and ¹³C NMR data. In particular, the ¹H NMR spectrum of cNM12<sup>O</sup> revealed the absence of the pyrrolic α-H resonances, whereas the endocyclic CH<sub>2</sub> moiety yielded a pair of very broad

peaks at ca. 4.8–3.4 ppm. This splitting, which was also observed for cNDA2<sup>O</sup>, is consistent with slow inversion of helicity occurring at the ethylene bridge. In the ¹H NMR spectrum of cNM12<sup>H</sup>, the linker CH<sub>2</sub> moiety and the 2,6-diisopropylphenyl (dipp) CH unit each produced a single broadened signal, indicating that the helix inversion occurs in the fast exchange regime. This apparently faster inversion in cNM12<sup>H</sup> than in the cNM12<sup>O</sup> and cNDA2<sup>O</sup> lactams correlates with the higher bond order of the α-α linkage in the latter two systems. The chirality of cNM13<sup>H</sup> is reflected in its ¹H NMR spectrum, which shows diastereotopic differentiation of N-CH<sub>2</sub> protons of the bridge and the CH signals of the dipp substituents, consistent with a rigid C<sub>2</sub>-symmetric structure. Analogous diastereotopic effects are observed for cNDA3<sup>O</sup> and cNM13<sup>O</sup>. For cNDA3<sup>O</sup>, the ¹H NMR spectrum is additionally complicated by the partially restricted rotation of the N,N-dimethylamide substituents in the NDA units. In conjunction with the helicity of the ring system, this restriction leads to effective diastereomerism.

The three-dimensional structures of all boomerangs were modeled using DFT calculations (Figure 1 and Supporting Information File 1). The length of the linker (n) in cNDAn<sup>X</sup> and

<footnote>ªConditions: acetic acid, 120 °C, 1 h; ᵇconcentration of the starting dipyrolylalkane (Rn<sup>H</sup>); ᶜ[equiv] ᵈKOAc (6 equiv), Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (2 equiv); ᶉisolated yields; ᶜn.d. = not determined. Only traces of cNDA2<sup>O</sup> were present in the crude mixture.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1:** DFT-Optimized structures (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)) of cNDA2O and cNMI3H.</figcaption></figure>

cNMIIn^X controls the in- and out-of-plane geometry of the chromophore. The observed changes can be expressed in terms of two parameters: α, the angle between the monopyrrole axis and the N–N vector, and θ, the torsion angle between the two monopyrrole axes (Supporting Information File 1, Table S1). In contrast to the previously reported cR1O dilactams, which were nearly planar [32], systems with *n* = 2 and 3 are characterized by a twisting distortion, which produces helicene-like conformations. The distortion results from an increased splay angle α between the two pyrrolic subunits, which leads to a greater steric congestion and, consequently, to an increase of the θ twist.

## Electronic properties

The absorption spectra of the cNMI2O and cNMI3O bipyrroles, recorded in dichloromethane, are red-shifted by respectively 74 and 86 nm relative to their cNDAAnO congeners (Table 2, Figure 2, see also Supporting Information File 1 for more optical data). Within each lactam series, when the bridge length *n* is increased from 2 to 3, the lowest-energy band is shifted by ca. 17 nm to longer wavelengths. Pairs of lactam rings present in cNMI2O and cNMI3O form a quinoidal substructure, which produces a very significant bathochromic shift of their lowest-energy absorption bands (up to 176 nm in toluene) in comparison to the of α-unsubstituted analogues. Lactam bipyrroles cNDAAnO and cNMIinO show noticeable solvatochromism which is stronger for *n* = 2 and is always negative. In contrast, the solvatochromism of α-free boomerangs is positive and even more pronounced. On going from toluene to acetonitrile, the onset of the lowest-energy band of cNMI2H is shifted to longer wavelengths by 25 nm.

The cNMI2H and cNMI3H bipyrroles are very efficient fluorophores (Table 2), noticeably more emissive than the lactam analogues and the other previously reported boomerangs [32]. Highest fluorescence quantum yields were observed in toluene (83 and 80%, respectively). For comparison, the Φ<sub>Π</sub> values for the lactams cNMI2O and cNMI3O are about 1%. Interestingly, the fluorescence of cNMIinH boomerang bipyrroles showed a stronger solvatochromic dependence than observed in their absorption spectra (Figure 2). In the more polar solvents, the emission profiles became significantly red shifted and broadened. At the same time, the fluorescence was only moderately quenched with increasing solvent polarity, and the quantum yields of 64 and 66% were recorded in acetonitrile for cNMI2H and cNMI3H, respectively.

To explore the chiral properties of the helically distorted boomerangs, the separation of enantiomers was attempted for all of them by means of chiral HPLC with CD detection, leading to enantioenriched samples of some boomerangs. The enantiomers of cR2O were found to racemize very fast, thus it was not possible to separate them. The cR3^X systems, which contain a 7-membered ring, showed a remarkably diverse behavior. Enantiomers of cNMI3O could not be separated, presumably because of very rapid racemization. The half-life time of cNDA3O enantiomers (ca. 0.54 min) was too short to record their CD spectra, but was long enough for a kinetics study (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S8 and S9). Enantioenriched samples of cNMI3H were configurationally most stable, showing no loss of their optical activity over the course of several hours in solution. Their CD spectra could be satisfactorily correlated with the TD-DFT data obtained for the
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2:** Absorption and emission spectra of **cNMI2**^H (top) and **cNMI3**^H (bottom) measured in toluene, dichloromethane and acetonitrile.</figcaption></figure>

**cNMI3**^H enantiomers (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S5 and S22). Circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) measurements performed for enantioenriched samples of **cNMI3**^H reveled weak signals of opposite signs, with a maximum at ca. 570 nm consistent with the unpolarized luminescence of this system (Supporting Information File 1, Figure S6). The CPL signals rapidly decayed during the measurements, without any significant loss of the unpolarized emission intensity. This behavior, which precluded a quantitative analysis of the CPL properties, may be attributed to a photoinduced racemization process. The differences in configurational stability of boomerangs are reproduced by DFT calculations, which predict inversion barriers $ΔC^{‡,298}$ of 20.0 and 24.7 kcal/mol for models of **cNDA3**^O and **cNMI3**^H, respectively (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S31 and S32). The latter value is consistent with the observed greatest stability of **cNMI3**^H.

Frontier molecular orbitals of the boomerangs reveal features characteristic of donor–acceptor systems (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S25–S30). For dilactams, **cRn**^O, the HOMO orbital is primarily localized on the dilactam (bipyrrole) moiety, however, with some non-zero amplitudes on the NDA/NMI fragment, whereas the LUMO level encompasses the $π$ system

more evenly. In the **cNMIn**^H series ($n$ = 2, 3), the HOMO and LUMO are formed by superposition of the corresponding MOs of the monomeric NMI pyrrole (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S23 and S24). However, the LUMO has observably lower amplitudes on the bipyrrole part of the molecule, whereas a more uniform coverage of the $π$ system is seen for the HOMO orbital. The experimentally observed bandgap variations and absorption profiles (Table 2 and Table 3, Supporting Information File 1, Figures S1–S4, and S11–S16) were qualitatively reproduced in TD-DFT calculations performed for **cNDA2**^O, **cNDA3**^O, and **cNMI3**^H (Table 2 and Table 3, Supporting Information File 1, Tables S2–S4).

The redox properties of the new bipyrrole boomerangs were investigated by means of cyclic (CV) and differential pulse (DPV) voltammetry (Supporting Information File 1, Figures S11–S16). All systems showed at least two reversible one-electron reduction couples and up to two oxidation couples. The first oxidation was reversible for all systems studied except **cNMI2**^H and **cNDA3**^O. The second oxidations were chemically irreversible in all cases and typically produced new irreversible peaks upon the consecutive cathodic scans. In the previously reported **cNMIn**^EE series ($n$ = 1, 2, 3) it was also possible to
<table><caption>**Table 2:** Experimental and calculated<sup>a</sup> properties of fused bipyrrroles.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">species</th><th colspan="3">MO energies [eV]<sup>a</sup></th><th rowspan="2">tol<sup>c</sup></th><th colspan="2">λ<sub>max</sub><sup>abs</sup> [nm]</th><th colspan="2">λ<sub>max</sub><sup>em</sup> [nm] (QY)</th></tr><tr><th>HOMO</th><th>LUMO</th><th>HLG<sup>b</sup></th><th>DCM<sup>d</sup></th><th>MeCN<sup>e</sup></th><th>tol<sup>c</sup></th><th>DCM<sup>d</sup></th><th>MeCN<sup>e</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>cNDA2<sup>O</sup></td><td>-5.47</td><td>-3.26</td><td>2.21</td><td>620</td><td>610</td><td>605</td><td>655 (0.07)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>cNDA3<sup>O</sup></td><td>-5.34</td><td>-3.28</td><td>2.06</td><td>636</td><td>620</td><td>617</td><td>694 (0.25)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI2<sup>O</sup></td><td>-5.95</td><td>-4.03</td><td>1.92</td><td>693</td><td>684</td><td>676</td><td>738 (0.01)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI3<sup>O</sup></td><td>-5.88</td><td>-4.03</td><td>1.85</td><td>711</td><td>706</td><td>703</td><td>768 (0.01)</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>-5.50</td><td>-2.78</td><td>2.72</td><td>555</td><td>570</td><td>580</td><td>575 (0.83)</td><td>74 (0.61)</td><td>650 (0.64)</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>-5.56</td><td>-2.73</td><td>2.83</td><td>535</td><td>540</td><td>546</td><td>574 (0.80)</td><td>605 (0.75)</td><td>655 (0.66)</td></tr></tbody></table>

observe one reversible oxidation and four reductions, the first two being reversible [32]. The first oxidation potentials ($E_{Ox1}$) vary from 0.62 to 1.09 V, while the first reduction potentials ($E_{Red1}$) range from -1.54 to -0.60 V (Table 3). The boomerangs with unsubstituted pyrrole α-positions (cNMI3H and cNMI2H) are characterized by significantly lower oxidation and reduction potentials than the corresponding dilactam analogues. The electrochemical data obtained for cNMI3O and cNMI2O indicate a destabilization of their HOMOs by about 0.5 eV while relative stabilization of the LUMO approaches 1 eV with respect to cNMI3H and cNMI2H. This comparably stronger LUMO stabilization in the NMI lactam systems results in a considerable decrease of their electrochemical gap ($ΔE$, by ca. 0.5–0.7 V), relative to the α-free analogues. $ΔE$ values for lactams cRnO are relatively insensitive to the length of the alkylene linker *n*, in spite of the large changes of the inter-subunit torsion (θ, Supporting Information File 1, Table S1) caused by the increase of *n*. In line with the absorption spectroscopy data, the $ΔE$ gap is reduced in the cNMInO series by 0.25 to 0.36 V relative to the corresponding cNDAnO analogues. Interestingly, the difference between the first and second reduction potentials in the cRnO dilactams is in the range of 0.25 to 0.33 V, indicat-

ing a strong coupling between the subunits. In comparison, this potential difference is much smaller in the α-free analogues cNMI3H and cNMI2H (ca. 0.1 V).

## Conclusion

The present work shows that the tandem cyclization–oxygenation reaction is a general strategy for the synthesis of low-bandgap bipyrrrole boomerangs and is applicable to targets with variable donor–acceptor character and increasing curvature of the bipyrrrole linkage. The efficiency of the oxygenation step is dependent on a several of factors, i.e., Pd loading, concentration, and additives. The isolation ofunoxygenated products cNMI2H and cNMI3H emphasizes the role of acceptor units and decreased inter-pyrrole coupling in moderating the reactivity of α positions toward oxygenation. The latter systems are of interest because of their very high fluorescence quantum yields, the best so far recorded for this family of fluorophores. Our preliminary results indicate that bipyrrrole boomerangs may be usable as CPL emitters, provided that their helicene-like twist is further stabilized against racemization. Efforts to achieve this goal are currently ongoing in our laboratory.

<table><caption>**Table 3:** Electrochemical data for the cNDAnO, cNMInO and cNMInH boomerangs derived from differential pulse voltammograms.<sup>a</sup></caption><thead><tr><th>species</th><th><i>E</i><sub>Red4</sub></th><th><i>E</i><sub>Red3</sub></th><th><i>E</i><sub>Red2</sub></th><th><i>E</i><sub>Red1</sub></th><th><i>E</i><sub>Ox1</sub></th><th><i>E</i><sub>Ox2</sub></th><th>Δ<i>E</i><sup>b</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>cNDA1<sup>O c</sup></td><td>-2.52<sup>d</sup></td><td>-1.95<sup>d</sup></td><td>-1.36</td><td>-1.03</td><td>0.88<sup>d</sup></td><td>—</td><td>1.91</td></tr><tr><td>cNDA2<sup>O</sup></td><td>—</td><td>-1.82<sup>d</sup></td><td>-1.36</td><td>-1.07</td><td>0.98</td><td>1.08<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.05</td></tr><tr><td>cNDA3<sup>O</sup></td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-1.31</td><td>-1.03</td><td>0.89<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.01<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.92</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI1<sup>O c</sup></td><td>-1.84</td><td>-1.59</td><td>-0.83</td><td>-0.57</td><td>1.09<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.19<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.66</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI2<sup>O</sup></td><td>-1.90</td><td>-1.65</td><td>-0.85</td><td>-0.60</td><td>1.09</td><td>—</td><td>1.69</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI3<sup>O</sup></td><td>-1.97</td><td>-1.73</td><td>-0.86</td><td>-0.61</td><td>1.04</td><td>1.16<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.65</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI2<sup>H</sup></td><td>—</td><td>-2.46<sup>d</sup></td><td>-1.67</td><td>-1.59</td><td>0.62<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.76<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.21</td></tr><tr><td>cNMI3<sup>H</sup></td><td>—</td><td>-2.54</td><td>-1.80</td><td>-1.70</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.98<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.38</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Molecular orbital energies, B3LYP/6-31G(d,p); <sup>b</sup>HOMO–LUMO gap; <sup>c</sup>in toluene; <sup>d</sup>in dichloromethane; <sup>e</sup>in acetonitrile.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Measurements were performed in dichloromethane solution using glassy carbon, platinum rod, and Ag/AgCl as working, auxiliary, and pseudoreference electrodes, respectively. All electrode potentials are in volt and are referenced with the ferrocene/ferrocenium couple as the internal standard.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup>Electrochemical HOMO–LUMO gap $ΔE = E_{Ox1} - E_{Red1}$. <sup>c</sup>Previously reported data [32]. <sup>d</sup>Irreversible.</footnote>
## Supporting Information

### Supporting Information File 1

Synthetic, spectroscopic, and computational details.
[https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/content/supplementary/1860-5397-16-81-S1.pdf]

### Supporting Information File 2

Cartesian coordinates.

[https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/content/supplementary/1860-5397-16-81-S2.zip]

## Funding

Financial support from the National Science Center of Poland (UMO-2017/27/N/ST5/00613 L.M.) and the Foundation for Polish Science (TEAM POIR.04.04.00.00-5BF1/17-00 M.S.) is gratefully acknowledged. L.F. acknowledges the Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Rennes Metropole for financial support.

## ORCID® iDs

Lilia Moshniaha - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-178X

Marika Żyla-Karwowska - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-9242

Piotr J. Chmielewski - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-6110

Ludovic Favereau - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7847-2911

Marcin Stępień - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-8093

## References

1. Narita, A. Synthesis of Structurally Defined Nanographene Materials through Oxidative Cyclodehydrogenation. In *Synthetic Methods for Conjugated Polymers and Carbon Materials*; Leclerc, M.; Morin, J.-F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2017; pp 183–228.
doi:10.1002/9783527695959.ch6

2. Stępień, M.; Gońka, E.; Żyla, M.; Sprutta, N. *Chem. Rev.* **2017**, *117*, 3479–3716. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00076

3. Wang, X.-Y.; Yao, X.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K. *Acc. Chem. Res.* **2019**, *52*, 2491–2505. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00322

4. Grzybowski, M.; Sadowski, B.; Butenschön, H.; Gryko, D. T. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2020**, *59*, 2998–3027.
doi:10.1002/anie.201904934

5. Sarhan, A. A. O.; Bolm, C. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2009**, *38*, 2730.
doi:10.1039/b906026j

6. Grzybowski, M.; Skonieczny, K.; Butenschön, H.; Gryko, D. T. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2013**, *52*, 9900–9930.
doi:10.1002/anie.201210238

7. Simpson, C. D.; Brand, J. D.; Berresheim, A. J.; Przybilla, L.; Räder, H. J.; Müllen, K. *Chem. – Eur. J.* **2002**, *8*, 1424–1429.
doi:10.1002/1521-3765(20020315)8:6<1424::aid-chem1424>3.0.co;2-z

8. Ormsby, J. L.; Black, T. D.; Hilton, C. L.; Bharat, King, B. T. *Tetrahedron* **2008**, *64*, 11370–11378. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.105

9. Golling, F. E.; Quernheim, M.; Wagner, M.; Nishiuchi, T.; Müllen, K. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2014**, *53*, 1525–1528.
doi:10.1002/anie.201309104

10. Chen, F.; Tanaka, T.; Osuka, A. *Chem. Commun.* **2017**, *53*, 2705–2708. doi:10.1039/c7cc00329c

11. Seifert, S.; Shoyama, K.; Schmidt, D.; Würthner, F. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2016**, *55*, 6390–6395.
doi:10.1002/anie.201601433

12. Zhylitskaya, H.; Stępień, M. *Org. Chem. Front.* **2018**, *5*, 2395–2414.
doi:10.1039/c8qo00423d

13. Navakouski, M.; Zhylitskaya, H.; Chmielewski, P. J.; Lis, T.; Cybińska, J.; Stępień, M. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2019**, *58*, 4929–4933. doi:10.1002/anie.201900175

14. Shoyama, K.; Würthner, F. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2019**, *141*, 13008–13012. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b06617

15. Myśliwiec, D.; Stępień, M. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2013**, *52*, 1713–1717. doi:10.1002/anie.201208547

16. Feng, C.-N.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Wu, Y.-T. *Chem. Rec.* **2015**, *15*, 266–279.
doi:10.1002/tcr.201402066

17. Matsuoka, W.; Ito, H.; Itami, K. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2017**, *56*, 12224–12228. doi:10.1002/anie.201707486

18. Daigle, M.; Picard-Lafond, A.; Soligo, E.; Morin, J.-F. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2016**, *55*, 2042–2047.
doi:10.1002/anie.201509130

19. Morin, J.-F.; Daigle, M.; Desroches, M. Photochemical and Direct C–H Arylation Routes toward Carbon Nanomaterials. In *Synthetic Methods for Conjugated Polymers and Carbon Materials*; Leclerc, M.; Morin, J.-F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2017; pp 229–253. doi:10.1002/9783527695959.ch7

20. Ozaki, K.; Kawasumi, K.; Shibata, M.; Ito, H.; Itami, K. *Nat. Commun.* **2015**, *6*, 6251. doi:10.1038/ncomms7251

21. Hassan, J.; Sévignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, E.; Lemaire, M. *Chem. Rev.* **2002**, *102*, 1359–1470. doi:10.1021/cr000664r

22. Åkermark, B.; Eberson, L.; Jonsson, E.; Pettersson, E. *J. Org. Chem.* **1975**, *40*, 1365–1367. doi:10.1021/jo00897a048

23. Hellwinkel, D.; Kistenmacher, T. *Liebigs Ann. Chem.* **1989**, *945–949*.
doi:10.1002/jlac.198919890249

24. Stuart, D. R.; Fagnou, K. *Science* **2007**, *316*, 1172–1175.
doi:10.1126/science.1141956

25. Yeung, C. S.; Dong, V. M. *Chem. Rev.* **2011**, *111*, 1215–1292.
doi:10.1021/cr100280d

26. Deng, Y.; Persson, A. K. Å.; Bäckvall, J.-E. *Chem. – Eur. J.* **2012**, *18*, 11498–11523. doi:10.1002/chem.201201494

27. Rank, C. K.; Jones, A. W.; Wall, T.; Di Martino-Fumo, P.; Schröck, S.; Gerhards, M.; Patureau, F. W. *Chem. Commun.* **2019**, *55*, 13749–13752. doi:10.1039/c9cc05240b

28. Zhylitskaya, H.; Cybińska, J.; Chmielewski, P.; Lis, T.; Stępień, M. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2016**, *138*, 11390–11398.
doi:10.1021/jacs.6b07826

29. Żyla-Karwowska, M.; Zhylitskaya, H.; Cybińska, J.; Lis, T.; Chmielewski, P. J.; Stępień, M. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2016**, *55*, 14658–14662. doi:10.1002/anie.201608400

30. Moshniaha, L.; Żyla-Karwowska, M.; Chmielewski, P. J.; Lis, T.; Cybińska, J.; Gońka, E.; Oschwald, J.; Drewello, T.; Rivero, S. M.; Casado, J.; Stępień, M. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2020**, *142*, 3626–3635.
doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13942

31. Navakouski, M.; Zhylitskaya, H.; Chmielewski, P. J.; Żyla-Karwowska, M.; Stępień, M. *J. Org. Chem.* **2020**, *85*, 187–194.
doi:10.1021/acs.joc.9b02556
32. Żyla-Karwowska, M.; Moshniaha, L.; Hong, Y.; Zhylitskaya, H.; Cybińska, J.; Chmielewski, P. J.; Lis, T.; Kim, D.; Stępień, M. *Chem. – Eur. J.* **2018**, *24*, 7525–7530. doi:10.1002/chem.201801199

33. Żyla-Karwowska, M.; Moshniaha, L.; Zhylitskaya, H.; Stępień, M. *J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *83*, 5199–5209. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b00630

34. Vauthey, E. *ChemPhysChem* **2012**, *13*, 2001–2011. doi:10.1002/cphc.201200106

## License and Terms

This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.

The license is subject to the *Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry* terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

The definitive version of this article is the electronic one which can be found at: doi:10.3762/bjoc.16.81