Neves and Cesar [647] produced a tutorial concerning analytical calculations of optical forces on spherical particles in optical tweezers, presenting into four parts a tour around GLMT. The first part introduced electromagnetic issues along with the multipole BSCs. The second part explored how the BSCs are determined and this is illustrated in the simple case of a plane wave. The third part presented the highly focused beam description along with the BSCs. Finally, the fourth part presented the optical force through the Maxwell stress tensor in terms of the BSCs.

Li et al. [648] provided a review of optical tweezers in vacuum. Unlike levitating particles in liquid or air, optical tweezers operating in vacuum are isolated from environmental thermal noise, thus eliminating the primary source of dissipation present for most inertial sensors. The history and the basic concepts of optical tweezers in vacuum are discussed, providing an overall understanding of the field.

Favre-Bull et al. [649] provided an overview of optical tweezers, dealing in particular with the complications that arise in carrying out optical tweezers manipulation *in vivo*, addressing specific methods that have been used to address a range of otherwise inaccessible biological questions, discussing quantitative measurements of forces and torques, common applications of optical trapping in biology (single molecules, single-cell manipulation, advanced devices and optical techniques for optical tweezers in biology), and trapping at the limits (light scattering in biology, trapping through highly scattering media, trapping complex biological objects and structures).

Zemanek et al. [145] focused on the transport processes that light can initiate on small spatial scales. In particular, they discussed in depth various light-induced mechanisms for the controlled transport of microscopic particles, these mechanisms relying on the direct transfer of momentum between the particles and the incident light waves, on the combination of optical forces with external forces of other nature, and on light-triggered photophoretic motion, covering the majority of light-induced physical mechanisms and experimental arrangements that can be exploited for initiating controlled, directional transport of illuminated micro-objects.

Andrew et al. [650] reviewed the issue of optical tweezers and of the possible mechanisms for damage, and more importantly examined the role of optical micromachines as tools for biological studies. The review covered the achievement to date in the field of optical micromachines, dealing with improvements in the ability to produce micromachines, including multi-body microrobots, and with considerations for both optical microrobots and the optical trapping set-up used for controlling them. The review focussed especially on the role of micromachines in biological research, and explored some of the potential that the technology has in this area. Finally, the review finished with a speculative view of the future, briefly exploring a few possibilities for the use of optical microrobots in biological studies.

Avsievich et al. [651] reviewed optical tweezers applications in hemorhéological research, placing emphasis on red blood cells but also discussing optical tweezers applications for the investigation of the biomechanics of leukocytes and platelets while Min et al. [652] reviewed the main research directions and representative achievements of optical tweezers, introducing in particular a classification depending on the distribution of incident light beams, and Yang et al. [653] summarized the recent advances in the field of optical trapping using structured light beams.

Pesce et al. [654] provided a comprehensive review of the theoretical background and experimental techniques dealing with optical forces, for implementation in optical tweezers simulations with a particular emphasis on holographic optical tweezers, accounting for the important aspect of Brownian motion in optical traps.

Wang et al. [655] provided a review concerning the coupling between optical trapping combined with advanced laser spectroscopic techniques to achieve on-trap single-particle studies, with single particles encompassing carbons, dust, metal oxides, pollens, spores, organic/inorganic droplets, and techniques encompassing Raman spectroscopy, cavity ring-down spectroscopy, light scattering, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, etc.

Kalume et al. [656] dealt with optical-trapping laser techniques for characterizing airborne aerosol particles, particularly chemical aerosol particles, and its application in chemical aerosol study. They also reviewed spectroscopic methods that are based on the light-particle interaction, including elastic light scattering, light absorption (cavity ring-down and photoacoustic spectroscopies), inelastic light scattering and emission (Raman, laser-induced breakdown, and laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopies), and digital holography. The authors discussed each method, highlighted the advantages and limitations, early breakthroughs, and recent progresses that have contributed to a better understanding of single particles and particle ensembles in general.

Li et al. [657] provided an overview on recent advances in optical manipulation with orbital angular momentum (OAM), helpful for understanding the mechanisms behind light-matter interactions, focusing on optical manipulation of microparticles using OAM, and covering a general introduction about OAM and their emerging applications, the basic concepts of angular momentum, different light beams carrying OAM, the generation and detection of OAM beams, the origin of optical manipulation, the principles of optical tweezers, the development of optical manipulation, and research progress in optical manipulation using OAM, including optical spanners, manipulation of low-refractive index particles, optical sorting and guiding, optical spin-orbit interaction, as well as chiral discrimination.

Tsui et al. [658] discussed recent advances on the role of a focused laser in micro- and nanofluidic systems, with special interest in thermo-fluid dynamical aspects and their importance on optical manipulation. As a brief introduction to microfluidic systems, they described the advantages and challenges of the use of micro- and nanoscale confinement in optical trapping, as well as standard fabrication techniques for micro- and nanofluidic systems. Various phenomena that accompany a laser irradiation to fluidic devices are explained in detail. These phenomena can affect the optical trapping of target materials significantly, and are classified into two categories: one that induces the fluid flow around the target and another that directly acts on it as an external force. The authors discussed as well optical forces and optical tweezers, measurements and detections of target materials, and laser-induced fluid motion.

Shen and Huang [659] discussed metasurfaces which have been used to replace traditional objective lenses, and may then be helpful to achieve device integration and obtaining multifunctions of optical tweezers, and therefore reviewed the latest progress in the field of optical tweezers with metasurfaces. They classified optical tweezers with metasurfaces and summarized the new impetus brought by metasurfaces for the development of optical tweezers.

Winstone et al. [660] provided a tutorial on levitated optomechanics, i.e. the study of the mechanical interaction of light with matter, which has proven to be a fruitfull area of research that yielded many notable achievements, including the direct detection of gravitational waves in kilometer-scale optical interferometers. In levitated optomechanics, an object can be suspended by radiation pressure and largely decoupled from its environment, with many notable results relevant for precision measurement, quantum information science, and foundational tests of quantum mechanics and fundamental physics. The authors then compiled a survey of several current activities in the field along with a tutorial describing associated key concepts and methods, both from an experimental and theoretical points of view.

Cai et al. [661] reviewed the coupling methods used for WGMs, summarized their characteristics and introduced the coupling methods with recent advances in the field, namely free space coupling, coupling via an evanescent wave, tapered fiber coupling, waveguide coupling, coupling of prism and fiber tip, bend fiber coupling, as well as new methods for coupling, i.e. in-fiber coupling and scarred mode coupling. See as well Cai et al. [662] who introduced the basic characteristics and sensing principle of WGMs, the manufacturing method of WGMRs (Circular symmetric microresonators based on a beam confinement principle), and the sensing applications of microresonators in the field
of physics, chemistry and biology. The detection limits of physical pa-
rameters and the detection sensitivity of biomolecules in recent decades
are summarized. In addition the advantages and disadvantages of dif-
ferent structures and the development trend of WGMRs applications are
discussed.

Zhang et al. [663] discussed radiation induced plasmonic nanobub-
bles, dealing with the aspects of fundamentals, applications and
prospects, introducing the physics of PNP (plasmonic nanoparticles)
generation and discussing the micro convection and optical nonlin-
earity caused by PNPs, in relation with localized surface plasmon
resonances and electric field enhancement, as well as photothermal
effects, induced by the localized plasmons. They also demonstrated the
nucleation mechanism and the development of PNPs mediated by heat
and plasma, and reviewed the PNPs-based application in microfluid
flow control, particle manipulation, optical property tuning, medical
drug delivery and cancer therapy, and highlighted the importance of
optical nonlinearity to radiative transfer. Finally, they summarized the
current challenges of this field and proposed an outlook for future
developments. Although this is the result of a personal bias due to
my activities in fluid instabilities produced by local heating close to
a surface, e.g. [664], I would like to particularly mention Section 2.3
devoted to photothermal effect induced by localized surface plasmon
resonances, and Section 3.4 devoted to Marangoni convection caused
by PNPs.

Li et al. [665] summarized the current types of microsphere lenses,
as well as their principles, and applications in many fields, namely
nano-optical trapping, signal enhancement (fluorescence signal en-
hancement of trapped nano-objects, backscattering signal enhancement
of trapped nano-objects, Raman signal enhancement by microsphere
superlenses), super-resolution imaging by photonic nanojets including
super-resolution imaging of living cells by photonic nanojets, with
particular attention paid to research progress in photonic nanojets for
the trapping, sensing, and imaging of biological cells and tissues.

Surdo et al. [666] discussed nanopatterning with photonic nanojets,
dealing with a review and perspectives in biomedical research, because
nanostructured surfaces and devices offer astounding possibilities for
biomedical research, including cellular and molecular biology, diagnos-
tics, and therapeutics. To overcome the fact that the wide implemen-
tation of these systems is currently limited by the lack of cost-effective
and easy-to-use nanopatterning tools, a promising solution is to use
optical methods based on photonic nanojets, namely, needle-like beams
featuring a nanometric width. The review then surveyed the physics,
engineering strategies, and recent implementations of photonic nano-
jets for high-throughput generation of arbitrary nanopatterns, along
with applications in optics, electronics, mechanics, and biosensing.

Minh et al. [667] made a review on generic and advanced charac-
terization techniques including those associated with light scattering,
having in mind the valorization of biomass, biowastes and by-products
which is among the key issue to be considered in the development of
renewable energies from bioresources,

Romanov and Yurkin [668] provided a comprehensive review on
the issue of single-particle characterization by elastic light scattering
although, as acknowledged by the authors, the discussion of semi-
quantitative imaging methods such as tomography or holography-based
reconstruction, is deliberately omitted and Swirniak and Mroczka [669]
dealt with a review of forward and inverse analysis for PSD measure-
ments of disperse samples.

Martin et al. [670] presented an overview of experimental methods for particle characterization with in-line holographic microscopy and discussed three recent analysis techniques: fitting scattering models to holograms, using machine learning to localize and classify particles under study, and describing a hybrid approach that uses machine learning to initialize fits.

Ranasinghesagara et al. [671] provided a tutorial related to the
development and application of nonlinear optical microscopy methods

in biomedical research, and offered a model-based approach illustrat-
ing how analytical methods from classical electromagnetism can be
employed to comprehensively model nonlinear optical microscopy in
scattering media.

Mulla et al. [672] provided a thorough overview of the current state
of research into the approaches employed to achieve thermal radiative
barrier coatings for reflection of near-infrared radiation, either by mod-
ification of existing infrastructures or via completely novel approaches.
Moreover, to complement the experimental research in this domain,
an emphasis is laid on the modeling approaches to expedite further
advancements, discussing the Kubel-Munk two-flux model, four-flux
extensions, FDTD and Monte-Carlo methods.

Baudoin and Thomas [673] carried out an extended review on
the issue of acoustic scattering and trapping. They insist on the fact
that acoustical trapping is achieved with several orders of magnitude
larger forces at the same input power that optical tweezers, limiting
spurious heating and enabling damage-free displacement and orienta-
tion of biological samples. In addition, the availability of acoustical
coherent sources from kHz to GHz frequencies enables the manipulation
of a wide spectrum of particle sizes. After an introduction of the key
concepts behind fluid and particle manipulation with acoustic radiation
pressure and acoustic streaming, they highlighted the emergence of
specific wave fields, called acoustical vortices, as a mean to manipulate
particles selectively and in 3D. These acoustic vortices can also be used
to generate hydrodynamic vortices whose topology is controlled by the
topology of the wave. Also, the authors emphasized two theoretical
approaches for arbitrary acoustical beams (i) the first is to decompose
the incident wave into plane waves and then use the results obtained for
each plane wave modes (ii) the second called GLMT consists in looking
for a decomposition of the arbitrary incident wave in series of modes of
the wave equation, generally using a spherical basis. Note that the first
approach is called the ASD in electromagnetism, as reviewed recently
in [42] and actually can be used to evaluate the BSCs of the second
approach which occurred both in the optical and in the acoustical cases.

For miscellaneous reviews, see Sun et al. [674] who published a
book on invariant imbedding T-matrix method for light scattering by
non-spherical and inhomogeneous particles, Cook et al. [675] who
reviewed bio-optics changes in intensity, frequency, polarization and
direction of electromagnetic energy after interacting with a biological
particle (usually a cell) or a collection of biological particles, Wang
et al. [676] who provided a review concerning research in atmospheric
physics and atmospheric environment in Chinese atmospheric science
over the past 70 years, Frisvad and Kragh [677] who, after previous
papers devoted to the relationship between Lorenz and Mie theo-
ries [678–681], thoroughly complemented the issue, including recent
advances, Mishchenko and Yurkin [546] who revisited the interference
phenomena caused by pairs of co-propagating or counter-propagating
transverse electromagnetic waves by letting the host medium be ab-
sorbing, Mischenko [682] who provided a comprehensive thematic
T-matrix reference database for the period 2017–2019, Tribelsky and
Miroshnichenko [683] who dealt with the issue of resonant scatter-
ing of electromagnetic waves by small particles, focusing on new
(and often unexpected) aspects of the old problem of elastic light
scattering by small metal particles, Boel et al. [684] who discussed
particle formation, from single droplet drying to spray drying and
electrospraying, related to pharmaceutical applications, describing all
steps that one should consider when trying to engineer a certain
type of particle morphology, Mun et al. [178] who discussed multi-
pole decomposition for interactions between structured optical fields
and meta-atoms, covering a very large scope of approaches, Daraf-
sheh [685] who reviewed photonic nanojets and their applications
in contemporary literature, Minin and Minin [686] who provided an
overview of unusual physical phenomena which have been discovered
in studying the optics of dielectric mesoscale particles of an arbitrary-
dimensional shape and then covered a huge number of issues, namely
optical whirlpools, nano-vortices, optical hearts, Fano resonances in
dielectric Mie resonance mesophotonics, giant magnetic field genera-
tion in mesoscale particles, photonic nanojets, anomalous apodization
effect, tangential electric field component control, terajets, anomalous
Gouy phase shift, waveguide systems based on dielectric particles
chain, super-resolution, nanostructured particles, photonic hooks and
loops, plasmonic jets, and acoustic jets and hooks, Moud [687] who
reviewed recent advances in utility of artificial intelligence towards
multiscale colloid based materials design, in particular quoting the
fact that the LMT may be used to estimate individual particles three-
dimensional locations with nanoscale precision while also calculating
their sizes and refractive indices using holograms of colloidal particles
together with Moud et al. [688] who focused on the most current
machine learning algorithms that have assisted in the design of col-
loidal materials, including scopes such as experimental automation,
optimization, and microscopy enhancement, and looking at numerous
approaches to manufacturing particles and different sorts of inter-
actions, with discussions of holographic characterization, estimation
of individual properties using light scattering theories, particle tra-
jectory tracking, microscopy techniques in particular super-resolution
microscopy techniques, imaging technology to name a few issues in
which machine learning may provide assistance, Fuqiang et al. [689]
who reviewed the mechanisms of radiative transfer in porous media
from macroscale to pore scale, dealing with the radiative transfer equa-
tion, geometric optics, diffraction theory, electromagnetic radiation
theory or FDTD, Sedeh and Litchinitser [690] who reviewed recent
progress in the field of structured light-matter interaction with a focus
on all-dielectric nanostructures, discussing singular optics, spatially
and temporally structured light beams (decomposed between paraxial
wave solutions, cylindrical vector beams, non-separable states of light),
recent progress in the design and optimization of photonic platforms,
outlining some new phenomena enabled by the synergy of structured
light and structured materials, and describing promising directions
for applications of structured light beams and their interaction with
engineered nanostructures, Markel [392] who covered the theoretical
underpinnings of extinction by bounded (but not necessarily small or
spherical) particles, with a focus on extinction, absorption and scat-
tering, and a discussion of the optical theorem, Eghtesad et al. [691]
who reviewed various types of LIF (Laser Induced Fluorescence) tech-
niques and their applications in temperature measurements, and Yao
and Zheng [692] who described the fundamentals of nanophotonics,
dealing with plasmonics and surface plasmons, and Mie resonances in
dielectric structures. Other reviews may be found by using "review" as
a keyword.

**15. Miscellaneous issues**

Olmos-Trigo et al. [693] discussed the properties of pure multipole
beams with well-defined handedness or helicity, a class of beams being
considered concerns higher order multipolar beams which are vortex
beams vanishing on the propagation axis. Chen et al. [694] adressed
the following question: For light scattering by arbitrary obstacles,
is it possible to define globally invariant properties to characterize
any scattering that is dependent on neither the scattering bodies nor
the incident waves. Through a cornerstone theorem of global dif-
ferential geometry, the Poincaré-Hopf theorem, they show that for
arbitrary finite obstacle scattering in a homogeneous background, there
must be isolated singular directions where the scattering is either
zero or circularly polarized, exhibiting two kinds of singularities of
a topological origin, therefore merging Mie scattering with global
topological concepts which can potentially nourish new perspectives
for both conventional Mie scattering related problems and the recently
expanding field of topological photonics. Parker et al. [695] dealt with
the excitation of nonradiating anapoles in dielectric nanospheres, and
reported the excitation of the electrodynamic anapole state in isotropic
silicon nanospheres using radially polarized beam illumination, using
GLMT to calculate the distribution of local fields. Yang et al. [696]

dealt with symmetry protected invariant scattering properties for in-
cident plane waves of arbitrary polarizations. They studied plane wave
Mie scattering and demonstrated through geometric reasoning how
to achieve invariant scattering properties in terms of cross-sections
for arbitrary polarization based on discrete spatial symmetries. Sym-
metries considered are: rotational symmetries, perpendicular mirror
symmetry and inversion symmetry. The scatterers are structures made
of point charges and scattering configurations exhibiting the symme-
tries. Gouesbet et al. [697] dealt with symmetries of the Poynting
vector which are related to symmetries occurring in the BSCs, and ex-
tended the BSCs symmetries of laser beams, already uncovered, to new
families. Examples and counter-examples are furthermore provided to
illustrate these symmetries and formal laboratories are proposed as
a way to discover still more symmetries. Olmos-Trigo [698] demon-
strated that a measurement of the Stokes vector at an angle of choice
grants access to fundamental nanophotonics magnitudes that are typ-
ically hidden in the scattered field, which can be expressed in terms
of electric and magnetic scattering coefficients. Considering that the
transmission characteristics of the vortex beam are one of the main-
stream research directions of 6G wireless technology in the future,
Wei et al. [699] presented a theoretical model for computing the spec-
trum of focused perfect optical vortex beam following its propagation
through anisotropic atmospheric turbulence. Su et al. [700] dealt with
photovoltaic conversion efficiency and carrier transport processes in
silicon solar cells, and employed simulations to explore the effects of
microscale light field focusing on the photogenerated carrier generation
rate. Radomski et al. [701] studied a theoretical model of heat and
mass transfer of metallic nanoparticles moving freely in a pipe, in which
absorption and scattering coefficients are described using in particular
LMT. Ambrosio et al. [702] proposed a polychromatic GLMT dealing
with the case when the scatterers are illuminated with beams having
different wavelengths, leading to the replacement of BSCs used in the
monochromatic GLMTs by Field Shape Spectra (FSS).

**16. Conclusion**

Although this review has been focused on T-matrix approaches
(i.e. GLMT, EBCM) as announced in the title, there is another point
of view to be considered. Indeed, T-matrix approaches rely on the
decomposition of incident fields over basic components. The most
efficient approach deals with the decomposition of the incident fields in
terms of vector wave functions, with expansion coefficients expressed
in terms of beam shape coefficients. The second approach relies on the
decomposition of the incident fields in terms of plane waves (ASD).
Most generally, the incident field spectra are continuous functions.
If such spectra have to be implemented numerically, then the ASD
is inefficient. Otherwise, an efficient procedure is to use the ASD to
evaluate BSCs. The BSCs are then the key quantities to handle light
scattering and many of the papers quoted in the present review indeed
deal with the evaluation of BSCs. Other papers have been collected
relying on quotations and, although they do not necessarily deal with
BSCs, they then provide an overview on light scattering theories and
applications. I hope that the review, with about 700 references, is then
useful both for confirmed scatterists who may have a bird view over
the evolution of a landscape they already know, and to the newcomers
who, in one step, may then get the bird view that their more aged
colleagues already have.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Gérard Gouesbet: Writing – original draft.

**Declaration of competing interest**

The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to
influence the work reported in this paper.
# Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

# References

[1] Gouesbet G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and applications. Part Part Syst Charact 1994;11(1):22-34.

[2] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theories, from past to future. Atomiz Sprays 2000;10(3-5):277-333.

[3] Gouesbet G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theories, the third decade: A perspective. In: Invited Review Paper. Special issue, Xth conference on Electromagnetic and Light Scattering by Nonspherical Particles (2008). J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2009;110:1223-38.

[4] Lock JA, Gouesbet G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and applications. In: Invited Review Paper. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2009;110:800-7.

[5] Gouesbet G. Latest achievements in generalized Lorenz-Mie theories: A commented reference database. Ann Phys, Lpz 2014;526, 11-12:461-89.

[6] Gouesbet G. T-matrix methods for electromagnetic structured beams: A commented reference database for the period 2014-2018. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;230:247-81.

[7] Gouesbet G, Maheu B, Gréhan G. Light scattering from a sphere arbitrarily located in a Gaussian beam, using a Bromwich formulation. J Opt Soc Amer A 1988;5(9):1427-43.

[8] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theories, 3rd ed. Springer; 2023.

[9] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Sur la généralisation de la théorie de Lorenz-Mie. J Opt 1982;13,2:97-103.

[10] Waterman PC. Symmetry, unitarity, and geometry in electromagnetic scattering. Phys Rev D 1971;3(4):825-39.

[11] Mishchenko MI, Travis LD, Lacis AA. Scattering, absorption, and emission of light by small particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

[12] Doicu A, Wriedt T, Eremin YA. Light scattering by systems of particles. Springer, Berlin; 2006.

[13] Mishchenko MI, Hovenier JW, Travis LD, editors. Light scattering by nonspherical particles. Theory, measurements and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.

[14] Mishchenko MI. Electromagnetic scattering by particles and particle groups, an introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

[15] Nieminen TA, Loke VLY, Stilgoe AB, Heckenberg NR, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H. T-matrix method for modelling optical tweezers. J Modern Opt 2011;58, 5-6:528-44.

[16] Mackowski DW, Mishchenko MI. Direct simulation of multiple scattering by discrete random media illuminated by Gaussian beams. Phys Rev A 2011;83:013804.

[17] Chen Z, Zhang HY, Huang Z, Wu X. Scattering of on-axis Gaussian beam by a uniaxial anisotropic object. J Opt Soc Amer A 2014;31(11):2545-50.

[18] Zheng M, Zhang HY, Sun YF, Wang ZG. Scattering of on-axis Gaussian beam by an arbitrarily shaped chiral object. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;151:192-7.

[19] Briard P, Wang J, Han YP. Shaped beam scattering by an aggregate of particles using generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. Opt Commun 2016;365:186-93.

[20] Mishchenko MI, Dlugach JM. Scattering of Gaussian beams by disordered particulate media. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2016;183:85-9.

[21] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. List of problems for future research in generalized Lorenz-Mie theories and related topics, review and prospectus: Commemorative invited paper, for the 50th anniversary of "applied optics". Appl Opt 2013;52(5):897-916.

[22] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. On the electromagnetic scattering of arbitrary shaped beams by arbitrary shaped particles: A review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;162:31-49.

[23] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. On the description of electromagnetic arbitrary shaped beams: The relationship between beam shape coefficients and plane wave spectra. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;162:18-30.

[24] Gouesbet G. T-matrix formulation and generalized Lorenz-Mie theories in spherical coordinates. Opt Commun 2010;283(4):517-21.

[25] Bates R, Wall D. Null field approach to scalar diffraction. I. General method. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1977;287(1339):45-78.

[26] Hackman R, Lim R. Development and application of the spheroidal coordinate based T-matrix solution to elastic wave scattering. Radio Science 1994;29(4):1035-49.

[27] Doicu A, Wriedt T. Formulations of the extended boundary condition method for incident Gaussian beams using multiple-multipole expansions. J Modern Opt 1997;44(4):785-801.

[28] Nieminen TA, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Heckenberg NR. Calculation of the T-matrix: General considerations and applications of the point-matching method. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2003;79:1019-29.

[29] Zakharova NT, Videen G, Khlebtsov NG. Comprehensive T-matrix reference database: A 2009-2011 update. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2012;113:1844-52.

[30] Alonso M, Guttiérez-Cuevas R, Moore N. Lorenz-mie theory scattering of focused light via complex focus fields: An analytic treatment. Phys Rev 2018;97(5):053848.

[31] Gouesbet G, Xu F, Han Y. Expanded description of electromagnetic arbitrary shaped beam in spheroidal coordinates for use in light scattering theories: A review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2011;112:2249-67.

[32] Gouesbet G, Wang J. On the structures of some light scattering theories depending on whether or not the bromwich formulation may be used, e.g. spherical versus spheroidal coordinates. Opt Commun 2012;285, 21-22:4200-6.

[33] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Interactions between arbitrary electromagnetic shaped beams and circular and elliptical infinite cylinders: A review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;286:108181.

[34] Gouesbet G, Letellier C, Ren KF, Gréhan G. Discussion of two quadrature methods of evaluating beam shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. Appl Opt 1996;35,9:1537-42.

[35] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA, Lock JA. On an infinite number of quadratures to evaluate beam shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and extended boundary condition method for structured EM fields. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;242:196779.

[36] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B. Localized interpretation to compute all the coefficients $g_n^m$ in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Opt Soc Amer A 1990;7(6):998-1007.

[37] Ren KF, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Integral localized approximation in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. Appl Opt 1998;37,19:4218-25.

[38] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B. Expressions to compute the coefficients $g_n^m$ in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory, using finite series. J Opt (Paris) 1988;19,1:35-48.

[39] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B. Computations of the $g_n$ coefficients in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory using three different methods. Appl Opt 1988;27,23:4874-83.

[40] Shen J, Liu J, Liu Z, Yu H. Angular spectrum decomposition method and the quadrature method in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for evaluating the beam shape coefficients of TEM01$^+$ doughnut beam. Opt Commun 2022;515:128224.

[41] Shen J, Wang Y, Yu H, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Angular spectrum representation of the Bessel-Gauss beam and its approximation: A comparison with the localized approximation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;284:108167.

[42] Gouesbet G, Lock JA, Han Y, Wang J. Efficient computation of arbitrary beam scattering on a sphere: Comments and rebuttal, with a review on the angular spectrum decomposition. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;276:107913.

[43] Gouesbet G, Lock JA, Gréhan G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theories and description of electromagnetic arbitrary shaped beams: localized approximations and localized beam models, a review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2011;112:1-27.

[44] Wang J, Gouesbet G. Note on the use of localized beam models for light scattering theories in spherical coordinates. Appl Opt 2012;51(17):3832-6.

[45] Gouesbet G. Second modified localized approximation for use in generalized Lorenz-Mie theories and other theories revisited. J Opt Soc Amer A 2013;30(4):560-4.

[46] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. Comments on localized and integral localized approximations in spherical coordinates. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2016;179:132-6.

[47] Gouesbet G. Validity of the localized approximation for arbitrary shaped beams in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for spheres. J Opt Soc Amer A 1999;16(7):1641-50.

[48] Gouesbet G. On the validity of localized approximations for Bessel beams: All N-bessel beams are identically equal to zero. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2016;176:82-6.

[49] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. On the validity of the use of a localized approximation for helical beams. I. Formal aspects. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2018;208:12-8.

[50] Gouesbet G, Lock JA, Ambrosio LA, Wang J. On the validity of localized approximation for an on-axis zeroth-order Bessel beam. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2017;195:18-25.

[51] Ambrosio LA, Wang J, Gouesbet G. On the validity of the integral localized approximation for Bessel beams and associated radiation pressure forces. Appl Opt 2017;56(19):5377-87.

[52] Chafiq A, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G, Belafhal A. On the validity of the integral localized approximation for on-axis zeroth-order Mathieu beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2018;204:27-34.

[53] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On the validity of the use of a localized approximation for helical beams. II. Numerical aspects. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2018;215:41-50.

[54] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On localized approximations for Laguerre-Gauss beams focused by a lens. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2018;218:100-14.

[55] Ambrosio LA, Votto LFM, Gouesbet G, Wang J. Assessing the validity of the localized approximation for discrete superposition of Bessel beams. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2018;35(11):2690-8.

[56] Votto LFM, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Evaluation of beam shape coefficients of paraxial Laguerre-Gauss beam freely propagating by using three remodeling methods. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;239:106618.
[57] Valdivia NL, Votto LFM, Gouesbet G, Wang J, Ambrosio LA. Bessel-Gauss beams in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory using three remodeling techniques. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;256:107292.

[58] Gouesbet G, Votto LFM, Ambrosio LA. Finite series expressions to evaluate the beam shape coefficients of a Laguerre-Gauss beam freely propagating. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;227:12-9.

[59] Votto LFM, Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. A framework for the finite series method of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and its application to freely propagating Laguerre-Gaussian beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;309:108706.

[60] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA, Votto LFM. Finite series expressions to evaluate the beam shape coefficients of a Laguerre-Gauss beam focused by a lens in an on-axis configuration. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;242:106759.

[61] Votto LFM, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G, Wang J. Finite series algorithm design for lens-focused laguerre-Gauss beams in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;261:107488, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[62] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Modified finite series technique for the evaluation of beam shape coefficients in the T-matrix methods for structured beams with application to Bessel beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;248:107007.

[63] Votto LFM, Chafiq A, Belafhal A, Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Hermite-Gaussian beams in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory through finite-series Laguerre-Gaussian beam shape coefficients. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2022;39(4):1027-32 with a supplemental document.

[64] Votto LFM, Chafiq A, Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA, Belafhal A. Ince-Gaussian beams in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory through finite series Laguerre-Gaussian beam shape coefficients. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;302:108565.

[65] Lin J, Zhong S, Shen J. Equivalence between radial quadrature and finite series for spherical wave expansion of Bessel beams. J Opt Soc Amer A 2023;40(6):1201-7.

[66] Votto LFM, Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Blowing-ups of beam shape coefficients of Gaussian beams using finite series in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;311:108787.

[67] Gouesbet G, Votto LFM, Ambrosio LA. Evaluation of beam shape coefficients in T-matrix methods using a finite series technique: On blow-ups using hypergeometric functions and generalized Bessel polynomials. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2023;40(12):3174-81.

[68] Shen J, Tang S, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On evanescent waves and blowing-ups of the finite series technique in spherical wave expansion of shaped beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2024;313:108846.

[69] Wang C, Shen J, Ren K-F. Spherical harmonics expansion of the evanescent waves in angular spectrum decomposition of shaped beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;251:107012.

[70] Gouesbet G, Wang J, Han Y. Solution to the intrinsic method for the evaluation of beam shape coefficients in spheroidal coordinates. Opt Commun 2013;294:29-35.

[71] Han L, Gouesbet G, Han Y, Gréhan G, Wang J. Intrinsic method for the evaluation of beam shape coefficients in spheroidal coordinates for on-axis standard configuration. Opt Commun 2014;310:125-37.

[72] Han L, Han YP, Cui ZW, Wang J. Expansion of a zero-order Bessel beam in spheroidal coordinates by generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2014;147:279-87.

[73] Han L, Gouesbet G, Han Y. Intrinsic method for the evaluation of beam shape coefficients in spheroidal coordinates for oblique illumination. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2019;224:312-8, LIP2018 special issue.

[74] Gouesbet G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theories and mechanical effects of laser light, on the occasion of Arthur Ashkin's receipt of the 2018 Nobel prize in physics for his pioneering work in optical levitation and manipulation: A review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;225:258-77.

[75] Shen J, Liu J, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yu H. Cylindrical wave spectrum decomposition method for evaluating the expansion coefficients of the shaped beam in spherical coordinates. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;283:108138.

[76] Shen J, Liu Z, Liu J. Expanding non-axisymmetric beams in spherical coordinates with cylindrical wave spectrum decomposition. Results Phys 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.106068.

[77] Shen J, Yu H. Radial quadrature method for evaluating the beam shape coefficients in spherical coordinates. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;305:108627.

[78] Shen J, Zhong S, Lin J. Formulation of beam shape coefficients based on spherical expansion of the scalar function. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;309:108705.

[79] Gouesbet G, Wang J, Han YP. Transformations of spherical beam shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz-Mie theories through rotations of coordinate system. IV. Plane waves. Opt Commun 2010;283(17):3244-54.

[80] Onofri F, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Electromagnetic scattering from a multilayered sphere located in an arbitrary beam. Appl Opt 1995;34,30:7113-24.

[81] Onofri F, Blondel D, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. On the optical diagnosis and sizing of spherical coated and multilayered particles with phase-Doppler anemometry. Part Part Syst Charact 1996;13(2):104-11.

[82] Wu ZS, Guo LX, Ren KF, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Improved algorithms for electromagnetic scattering of plane waves and shaped beams by multilayered spheres. Appl Opt 1997;36,21:5188-98.

[83] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for a sphere with an eccentrically located spherical inclusion. J Modern Opt 2000;47,5:821-37.

[84] Wang J, Gouesbet G, Han YP, Gréhan G. Study of scattering from a sphere with an eccentrically located spherical inclusion by generalized Lorenz-Mie theory: Internal and external field distributions. J Opt Soc Amer A 2011;28(1):24-39.

[85] Wang J, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Saengkaew S. Morphology-dependent resonances in an eccentrically layered sphere illuminated by a tightly focused off-axis Gaussian beam. J Opt Soc Amer A 2011;28(9):1849-59.

[86] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for assemblies of spheres and aggregates. J Opt A: Pure Appl Opt 1999;1(6):706-12.

[87] Yang Y, Nie Z, Feng Y, Li R. Internal and near-surface fields for a charged sphere irradiated by a vector Bessel beam. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;240:106705.

[88] Chrissoulidis D, Richalot E, Lamprianidis A. Corrugated plane wave scattering by a sphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;250:107058.

[89] Orlov S, Berskys J. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory of photonic wheels. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;261:107490, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[90] Tang H, Li R, Gong S, Wei B, Yang L, Zhu Z, Wu Y, Mitri FG. Scattering of arbitrary-shaped optical polarized beams by a PEMC. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;281:108101.

[91] Albashir MH, Alseed HG, Diab H, Abdalaziz N. Optical characterization of spherical nanoparticles using simulation approach. EPRA Int Multidiscip Res 2023.

[92] Peng A, Liu W, Zuo Y, Guo L. Calibrator irregularity error compensation for radar cross section measurement. Antenna Wirel Propag Lett 2022;21(6):1263-7.

[93] Kashter Y, Falek E, Ginzburg P. Efficient computation of arbitrary beam scattering on a sphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;253:106887.

[94] Hudak NJ, Garrett BS, DeLacy BG, Mirotznik MS. Iterative design of multilayered dielectric microspheres with tunable transparency windows. J Opt Soc Amer A 2019;36(5):705-15.

[95] Rasskazov I, Moroz A, Carney PS. Electromagnetic energy in multilayered spherical particles. J Opt Soc Amer A 2019;36(9):1591-601.

[96] Rasskazov IL, Carney PS, Moroz A. STRATIFY: A comprehensive and versatile MATLAB code for a multilayered sphere. OSA Continuum 2020;3(8):2290-307.

[97] Guo L, Shen J. Internal and external-fields of a multilayered sphere illuminated by the shaped beam: Rescaled quantities for numerical calculation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;250:107004.

[98] Li R, Li BQ. Efficient progressive algorithm for light scattering of a multilayered concentric nanoparticle. Appl Opt 2022;61(35):10556-66.

[99] Li R, Li BQ. Progressive algorithm for the scattering of electromagnetic waves by a multilayered eccentric sphere. Appl Opt 2023;62(20):5588-97.

[100] Lamberg J, Zarrinkhat F, Tamminen A, Baggio M, Ala-Laurinaho J, Rius J, Romeu J, Khaled EEM, Taylor Z. Simulation of scattering from layered spheres with known surface electric field distributions using mie theory and modified angular spectrum method: Applications to corneal sensing. 2022, arXiv:2209.03043v1 [physics.optics].

[101] Li M, Bi L, Lin W. Distinct linear polarization of core-shell particles at near-backscattering directions. Opt Express 2023;31(26):44648-71.

[102] Chrissoulidis D, Richalot E, Protat S. Chirp backscattering by PEC sphere eccentrically placed in a dielectric sphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;256:107318.

[103] Eremenko ZE, Volovichiev IN, Breslavets AA. Frequency domain simulation method for electromagnetic oscillations in non-concentric layered ball resonator. IEEE Ukrain Micro Week 2020;September 21-25:643-7.

[104] Han KTM, Kazunori K, Siritanawan P, Kongprawechnon W, Sinthanayothin C. Simulation of multiple light scattering in intraocular lens with glistenings by T-matrix. In: International conference on advanced information technology. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AITC.2019.8920838.

[105] Höller RPM, Jahn IJ, Cialla-May D, Chanana M, Popp J, Fery A, Kuttner C. Biomacromolecular-assembled nanoclusters: Key aspects for robust colloidal SERS sensing. Appl Mater Interf 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.Oc.

[106] Xu Y-L. Electromagnetic scattering by an aggregate of spheres. Appl Opt 1995;34:4573-88.

[107] Haspel C, Cohen I. The SSSS scheme: A method for calculating multiple scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a collection of sparsely spaced spherical scatterers of mie-scattering size based on first principles. Appl Opt 2022;61(29):8563-77.

[108] Thong YL, Yoon TL. A neural network representation of generalized multiparticle Mie solution. Prog Electromagn Res 2022;112:15-28.

[109] Thong YL, Yoon TL. Global optimization for extinction curve reconstruction in inverse electromagnetic scattering of multiparticle aggregates. Progr Electromagn Res M 2023;119:75-88.

[110] Olmos-Trigo J, Zambrana-Puyalto X. On the helicity conservation for Mie optical cavities. 2022, arXiv:2205.12813v1 [physics.optics].
[111] Argentin C, Berg MJ, Mazur M, Ceolato R, Poux A, Yon J. A semi-empirical correction for the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans approximation for fractal aggregates based on phasor analysis: Application to soot particles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;283:108143.

[112] Arfan M, Ghaffar A, Alsaif FK, Khan Y, Shakir I. Analysis of light scattering of a Gaussian beam by a perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) sphere. Indian J Phys 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02835-4.

[113] Rui G, Li Y, Zhou S, Wang Y, Gu B, Cui Y, Zhan Q. Optically induced rotation of Rayleigh particles by arbitrary photonic spin. Photon Res 2019;7(1):69-79.

[114] Mitri FG. Optical cross-sections and energy efficiencies of a cylindrical material exhibiting circular dichroism in arbitrary-shaped monochromatic light-sheets. Optik 2020;217:164744.

[115] Loh WME. Stokes and anti-Stokes quantum fields from a mesoscopic microparticle with cylindrical geometry: Orientation, size and angular-dependence of spectra. Modern Phys Lett B 2020;20:501013.

[116] Khoobjou E, Khalesi H, Ghods V. An optimal design for decreasing dispersion in photonic crystal fiber. J Electr Eng Technol 2020;15:2691-8.

[117] Chen Z, Zhang HY, Wu X. Gaussian beam propagation through a biaxial anisotropic circular cylinder. Optik 2020;223:165650.

[118] Zhang HY, Chen K, Huang Z, Wang M. Gaussian beam scattering by an infinite cylinder with a spherical inclusion. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;245:106866.

[119] Chen Z, Zhang H, Wu X, Nian F. Electromagnetic beam propagating through a gyrotropic anisotropic circular cylinder. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;262:107519, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[120] Davis LW. Theory of electromagnetic beams. Phys Rev 1979;19(3):1177-9.

[121] Barton JP, Alexander DR. Fifth-order corrected electromagnetic field components for fundamental Gaussian beams. J Appl Phys 1989;66:7-2800-2.

[122] Gouesbet G, Lock JA, Gréhan G. Partial wave representations of laser beams for use in light scattering calculations. Appl Opt 1995;34:12:2133-43.

[123] Mitri FG. Longitudinal and transverse optical scattering asymmetry parameters for a dielectric cylinder in light-sheets of arbitrary wavefronts and polarization. Appl Opt 2021;60(6):1678-85.

[124] Zhang HY, Zhu D, Wang M, Li M, Liao T. Transmission of electromagnetic beam through a uniaxial anisotropic slab. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2019;224:114-9, LIP2018 special issue.

[125] Cui ZW, Han YP. A review of the numerical investigation on the scattering of Gaussian beam by complex particles. Phys Rep - Rev Sect Phys Lett 2014;538(2):39-75.

[126] Liu J-W, Li H-Y, Ding W, Bai L, Wu Z-S, Li Z-J. Comparison of three kinds of polarized Bessel vortex beams propagating through uniaxial anisotropic media. Chin Phys B 2019;28(9):094214.

[127] Liu J, Li H, Li R, Bai M, Wu Z. Reflection and transmission of a Bessel vortex beam by a stratified uniaxial anisotropic slab. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;251:107046.

[128] Yan B, Zhang H, Zhang J, Liu C, Lin X. Electromagnetic wave beam propagation through a chiral slab. Chinese J Phys 2021;73:613-21.

[129] Sigel R. Light propagation in layered media in a total reflection geometry: A transfer matrix method using virtually linear basis functions to handle critical conditions. J Opt Soc Amer A 2022;39(12):2142-52.

[130] Su B-D, Wang M-J, Peng Y, Yang S-H, Zhang H-Y. Internal and near-surface fields for a chiral sphere under arbitrary laser beam illumination. Chin Phys B 2019;28(6):064210.

[131] Li J, Feng X. Investigation of scattering of a pair of chiral spheres. Indian J Phys 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12648-019-01441-7.

[132] Bai J, Liu X, Ge C-X, Han X-Y, Wang Z-H, Wu Z-S. Dual Gaussian beam scattering of chiral spheres. 2023, p. 163-7, 10048659.

[133] Olmos-Trigo J, Nieto-Vesperinas M, Molina-Terriza G. Spheres of maximum electromagnetic chirality. 2023, arXiv:2303.08719v1 [physics.optics].

[134] Dorofeev IO, Suslyaev VI, Minin OV, Minin IV. Role of the tangential electric field component to the terahertz jet and hook formation by dielectric cube and sphere. Opt Eng 2020;60(8):082004.

[135] Gao X, Zhai C, Lin Z, Chen Y, Li H, Hu C. Simulation and experiment of the trapping trajectory for Janus particles in linearly polarized optical traps. Micromachines 2022;13:608. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13040608.

[136] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B. Scattering of a Gaussian beam by a mie scatter center, using a Bromwich formalism. J Opt (Paris) 1985;16(2):83-93, Republished in selected papers on light scattering, SPIE Milestone series, Vol 951, 1988, edited by M. Kerker.

[137] Gouesbet G, Maheu B, Gréhan G. The order of approximation in a theory of the scattering of a Gaussian beam by a mie scatter center. J Opt (Paris) 1985;16(5):239-47, Republished in selected papers on light scattering, SPIE Milestone series, Vol 951, 1988, edited by M. Kerker.

[138] Gouesbet G, Maheu B, Gréhan G. Scattering of a Gaussian beam by a sphere using a Bromwich formulation: Case of an arbitrary location. J Part Part Charact 1988;5(1):1-8.

[139] Maheu B, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. A concise presentation of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for arbitrary location of the scatterer in an arbitrary incident profile. J Opt (Paris) 1988;19(2):59-67.

[140] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B. Combustion measurements. In: Chigier N, editor. New-York, USA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1991, p. 339-84.

[141] Khosravi E, Jazi B, Abdoli-Arani A. Simulation of Gaussian electromagnetic wave interaction and its effect on the dynamics of metallic nanosphere (replusion or elasticity). Eur Phys J D 2022;137(27):139-139.

[142] Khosravi F, Jazi B, Abdoli-Atrani A. Simulation of Gaussian electromagnetic wave interaction and its effect on the dynamics of metallic nanosphere (replusion or even elasticity). The Eur Phys J Plus 2022;137-139:1-17.

[143] Khosravi F, Jazi B, Abdoli-Arani A. The plasma nanosphere cooling rate simulation in the presence of the coherent electromagnetic waves with Gaussian profile. Eur Phys J D 2022;76(96).

[144] Gao X, An Y, Han Y, Wang J, Cui Z, Briard P. Influence of temperature and humidity on scattering characteristics of aerosol particles in the tetrahertz band. J Opt Soc Amer A 2023;40(9):1762-9.

[145] Zemanek P, Volpe G, Jonas A, Brzobohaty O. Perspectives on light-induced transport of particles: From optical forces to phoretic motion. Adv Opt Photon 2019;11(3):577-678.

[146] Zambrana-Puyalto X, D'Ambrosio D, Gagliardi G. Efficient coupling of free propagating light into whispering gallery modes. EPJ Web Conf, EOSAM 2021;255:04002.

[147] Wang W, Yu H, Shen J, Tropea C. Data inversion algorithms for droplet characterization based on simulated rainbows. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;277:107986.

[148] Chen H, Lin H, Jones PH, Chen Z, Luo S, Pu J. Influence of slow light effect on trapping force in optical tweezers. Opt Lett 2022;47(3):710-3.

[149] Ren KF, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Laser sheet scattering by spherical particles. Part Part Syst Charact 1993;10(3):146-51.

[150] Gréhan G, Ren KF, Gouesbet G, Naqwi A, Durst F. Evaluation of a particle sizing technique based on laser sheets. Part Part Syst Charact 1994;11(1):101-6.

[151] Ren KF, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Evaluation of laser sheet beam shape coefficients in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory by use of a localized approximation. J Opt Soc Amer A 1994;11,7:2072-9.

[152] Ren KF, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Electromagnetic field expression of a laser sheet and the order of approximation. J Opt (Paris) 1994;25,4:165-76.

[153] Zhang S, Li R, Wei B, Zhang J, Sun H, Song N. Scattering of a non-paraxial Bessel light-sheet by a sphere of arbitrary size. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;245:106869.

[154] Zhang S, Li R, Wei B, Song N, Yang L, Sun H. Scattering of a non-paraxial Bessel pincer light-sheet by a dielectric sphere of arbitrary size. J Quant Spectrosc Radiative Transf 2021;268:107647, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[155] Zhai C, Cao Z. Elastic light scattering of a single sphere in a Gaussian light sheet. Optik 2019;194:163083.

[156] Durnin J. Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. I. The scalar theory. J Opt Soc Amer A 1987;4(4):651-4.

[157] Durnin J, J.J. Miceli Jr, Eberly JH. Diffraction-free beams. Phys Rev Lett 1987;58(15):1499-501.

[158] Mishra SR. A vector wave analysis of a Bessel beam. Opt Commun 1991;85:159-61.

[159] Bouchal Z. Nondiffracting optical beams: Physical properties, experiments, and applications. Czech J Phys 2003;53,7:537-78.

[160] Recami E, Zamboni-Rached M, Hernandez-Figueroa HE. Nondiffracting waves. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2014, p. 1-67.

[161] Hernandez-Figueroa HE, Recami E, Zamboni-Rached M, editors. Nondiffracting waves. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2014.

[162] Rondon I. An analytical approximation to measure the extinction cross-section using localized waves. J Phys Commun 2022;6:015003.

[163] Gouesbet G. Poynting theorem in terms of beam shape coefficients and applications to axisymmetric, dark and non-dark, vortex and non-vortex beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2017;201:184-96.

[164] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. A darkness theorem for the beam shape coefficients and its relationship to higher-order non vortex Bessel beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2017;201:229-35.

[165] Gouesbet G. Dark and superdark theorems with applications to helical beams (beams with a topological charge) which are not vortex beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2024;318:108949.

[166] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. Consequences of the angular spectrum decomposition of a focused beam including slower than c beam propagation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2016;178:142-51.

[167] Qu T, Li H, Wu Z, Shang Q, Wu J, Kong W. Scattering of aerosol by a high-order Bessel vortex beam for multimedia information transmission in atmosphere. Multimedia Tools Appl 2020;79:34159-71.

[168] Cui Z-W, Guo S-Y, Hui Y-F, Wang J, Han Y-P. Local dynamical characteristics of Bessel beams upon reflection near the Brewster angle. Chin Phys B 2021;30(4):044201.

[169] Zhang Y, Shen J. Comparison of a standard elliptical Bessel beam and a refracted circular Bessel beam at oblique incidence. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;272:107773.

[170] Glukhova SA, Yurkin MA. Vector Bessel beams: General classification and scattering simulations. 2022, arXiv:2203.16510.

[171] Glukhova SA, Yurkin MA. Vector Bessel beams: General classification and scattering simulations. Phys Rev A 2022;106:033508.
[172] Bai J, Ge C-X, Wu Z-S, Su P, Gao Y. Light interaction with cluster chiral nanostructures by high-order Bessel beam. Photonics 2022;9:509. http://dx.doi. org/10.3390/photonics9080509.

[173] Dong K, Jiang W, Cheng M, Shi C, Cao Y. Attenuation of Bessel vortex beam transmission in the rain environment. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;304:108620.

[174] Wang Z, Wei Q, Zhang S, Li L, Hu M, Li R. Scattering properties of Bessel beams on metal particles. Phys Scr 2023.

[175] Bai J, Liu X, Ge C-X, Wu Z-S, Zhang X-X. Scattering of aggregated multi-layered biological cells by Bessel beams. J Opt 2023;25(5):055401.

[176] Arfan M, Khaleel N, Ghaffar A, Khan Y, Shakir I. Study of scattering for a PEMC sphere with Bessel beam illumination. Opt Quantum Electron 2023;55-443.

[177] Chafiq A, Gouesbet G, Belafhal A. On the beam shape coefficients of fundamental nondiffracting beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;241:106750.

[178] Mun J, Moon S-W, Rho J. Multipole decomposition for interactions between structured optical fields and meta-atoms. Opt Express 2020;28(24):36756-70.

[179] Gutiérrez-Vega JC, Iturbe-Castillo MD, Chavez-Cerda S. Alternative formulation for invariant optical fields: Mathieu beams. Opt Lett 2000;25:1493-5.

[180] Chafiq A, Hricha Z, Belafhal A. Paraxial approximation of mathieu beams through an apertured ABCD optical system. Opt Commun 2005;253:223-30.

[181] Lopez-Mariscal C, Gutiérrez-Vega JC, Milne G, Dholokia K. Orbital angular momentum transfer in helical Mathieu beams. Opt Express 2006;14(9):4182-7.

[182] Karthashov YV, Egorov AA, Vysloukh VA, Torner I. Shaping soliton properties in Mathieu lattices. Opt Lett 2006;31(2):238-40.

[183] Mechate B El, Chafiq A, Belafhal A. On the rotation repetitions of Mathieu beams angular spectrum in frequency space. Optik 2021;247:168040.

[184] Ambrosio LA. Millimeter-structured nondiffracting surface beams. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2019;36(3):638-45.

[185] Ambrosio LA, Rached M Zamboni, Gouesbet G. Zeroth-order continuous vector frozen waves for light scattering: Exact multipole expansion in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2019;36(1):81-9.

[186] Ambrosio LA. Analytical description of on-axis zero-order continuous frozen waves in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;296:108442.

[187] Ambrosio LA, Zamboni-Rached M, Gouesbet G. Discrete vector frozen waves in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory: Linear, azimuthal and radial polarization. Appl Opt 2018;57(12):3293-300.

[188] Shi C, Guo L, Cheng M, Li R. Scattering of a higher-order Bessel Gaussian beam by a spherical marine aerosol. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;265:107552, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[189] Shi C, Cheng M, Guo L, Li R, Li J. Attenuation characteristics of Bessel Gaussian vortex beam by a wet dust particle. Opt Commun 2022;514:128138.

[190] Chafiq A, Belafhal A. Optical Fourier transform of pseudo-nondiffracting beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;258:107357, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[191] Dong K, Cheng M, Lavery MPJ, Geng S, Wang P, Guo L. Scattering of partially coherent vortex beam by rough surface in atmospheric turbulence. Opt Express 2022;30(3):4165-78.

[192] Arfan M, Ghaffar A, Alkanhal MAS, Khan Y, Alqahtani AH, Shakir I. Laguerre-Gaussian beam scattering by a marine aerosol. Opt Quantum Electron 2023;55:756.

[193] Sun M, Liu S, Guo L, Huang K, Cheng M. Scattering characteristics of electrically large arbitrarily shaped targets illuminated by an off-axis vortex electromagnetic beam. J Appl Phys 2023;133(12):124905.

[194] Liu Z, Shen J, Yu H. Scattering of Laguerre-Gauss light beam by a sphere: The angular spectrum decomposition method and a comparison with the localized approximation method. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;287:108214.

[195] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Generic formulation of a generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for a particle illuminated by laser pulses. Part Part Syst Charact 2000;17,5-6:213-24.

[196] Mées L, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Time-resolved scattering diagrams for a sphere illuminated by plane wave and focused short pulses. Opt Commun 2001;194,1-3:59-65.

[197] Mées L, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Scattering of laser pulses (plane wave and focused Gaussian beams) by spheres. Appl Opt 2001;40,15:2546-50.

[198] Mées L, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Interaction between femtosecond pulses and a spherical microcavity: Internal fields. Opt Commun 2001;199(1-4):33-8.

[199] Mées L, Wolf JP, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Two-photon absorption and fluorescence in a spherical micro-cavity illuminated by using two laser pulses: Numerical simulations. Opt Commun 2002;208, 4-6:371-5.

[200] Mées L, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Numerical predictions of microcavity internal fields created by femtosecond pulses, with emphasis on whispering gallery modes. J Opt A: Pure Appl Opt 2002;4:S150-3.

[201] Han YP, Mées L, Ren KF, Gréhan G, Wu ZS, Gouesbet G. Far scattered field from a spheroid under a femtosecond pulsed illumination in a generalized Lorenz-Mie theory framework. Opt Commun 2004;231(1-6):71-7.

[202] Mées L, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. Transient internal and scattered fields from a multi-layered sphere illuminated by a pulsed laser. Opt Commun 2009;282(21):4189-93.

[203] Panetta RL, Zhai S, Yang P. Internal electromagnetic waves, energy trapping, and energy release in simple time-domain simulations of single particle scattering. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;228:27-46.

[204] Zhang C, Tang M, Zhang H, Liu J. Optical breakdown during femtosecond laser propagation in water cloud. Opt Express 2019;27(6):8456-75.

[205] Chaussonnet G, Bardet PM. Scattering of an ultrashort laser pulse by a spherical air bubble. Opt Express 2020;28(19):27358-71.

[206] Chaussonnet G, Mèés Loic, Sormaz M, Jenny P, Bardet PM. Modeling multiple scattering transient of an ultrashort laser pulse by spherical particles. 2021, arXiv:2105.05466.

[207] Tribelsky MI, Miroshnichenko AE. Two tractable models of dynamic light scattering and their applications to Fano resonances. Nanophotonics 2021;10(17):4357-71.

[208] Shi C, Guo L, Cheng M, Lavery MPJ, Liu S. Aerosol scattering of vortex beams transmission in hazy atmosphere. Opt Express 2020;28(19):28072-84.

[209] Lu W, Sun X, Chen H, Liu S, Lin Z. Abruptly autofocusing property and optical manipulation of circular Airy beams. Phys Rev A 2019;99:013817.

[210] Lu W, Chen H, Liu S, Lin Z. Circular Airy beam with an arbitrary conical angle beyond the paraxial approximation. Phys Rev A 2022;105:043516.

[211] Zhou J, Abdelrahman MI, Conroy TB, Kan EC. A backscatter field model for near-field RF sensing. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2023.

[212] Corbin F, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Interaction between a sphere and a Gaussian beam: Computations on a micro-computer. J Part Part Syst Charac 1988;5:3:103-8.

[213] Ren KF, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Radiation pressure forces exerted on a particle arbitrarily located in a Gaussian beam by using the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory, and associated resonance effects. Opt Commun 1994;108, 4-6:343-54.

[214] Polaert H, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Forces and torques exerted on a multilayered spherical particle by a focused Gaussian beam. Opt Commun 1998;155(1-3):169-79.

[215] Lock JA. Calculation of the radiation trap force for laser tweezers by use of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. II. On-axis trap force. Appl Opt 2004;43:2545-54.

[216] Gouesbet G. Gradient, scattering and other kinds of longitudinal optical forces exerted by off-axis Bessel beams in the Rayleigh regime in the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;246:106913.

[217] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Axicon optical forces and other kinds of transverse optical forces exerted by off-axis Bessel beams in the Rayleigh regime in the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;258:107356, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[218] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Axicon terms associated with gradient optical forces in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;257:107260.

[219] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Rayleigh limit of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory: Axicon terms revisited. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;270:107691.

[220] Gouesbet G. Optical forces exerted by on-axis Bessel beams on Rayleigh particles in the framework of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;260:107471.

[221] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Rayleigh limit of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for on-axis beams and its relationship with the dipole theory of forces. Part I. Non dark axisymmetric beams of the first kind, with the example of Gaussian beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;266:107569.

[222] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Rayleigh limit of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for on-axis beams and its relationship with the dipole theory of forces. Part II: Non-dark axisymmetric beams of the second kind and dark axisymmetric beams, including a review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;273:107836.

[223] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On longitudinal radiation pressure cross-sections in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and their numerical relationship with the dipole theory of forces. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2021;38(3):825-33.

[224] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On transverse radiation pressure cross-sections in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and their numerical relationships with the dipole theory of forces. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;261:107491.

[225] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On the Rayleigh limit of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and its formal identification with the dipole theory of forces. I. The longitudinal case. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;262:107531.

[226] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. On the Rayleigh limit of the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and its formal identification with the dipole theory of forces. II. The transverse case. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;266:107591.

[227] Gouesbet G, de Angelis VS, Ambrosio LA. Optical forces and optical force categorizations on small magnetodielectric particles in the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;279:108046.

[228] Ambrosio LA, de Angelis VS, Gouesbet G. The generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and its identification with the dipole theory of forces for particles with electric and magnetic properties. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;281:108104.

[229] de Angelis VS, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Comparative numerical analysis between the multipole expansion of optical force up to quadrupole terms and the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2021;38(8):2353-61.
[230] Gouesbet G, Angelis VS De, Ambrosio LA. Optical forces and optical force categorizations exerted on quadrupoles in the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2023;298:108487.

[231] Gouesbet G, de Angelis V, Ambrosio LA. Optical forces and optical force partitions exerted on arbitrary sized spherical particles in the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2023.

[232] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Light, particles and plasmonics. In: Menguc Pinar, Francoeur Mathieu, editors. Elsevier; 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99901-4.00016-0.

[233] Zhang Y, Zhu H, Huang T, Song Z, Ruan S. Radiation-pressure-induced photoluminescence enhancement of all-inorganic perovskite CsPbBr-3 quantum dots. Photon Res 2019;7(8):837-46.

[234] Zaza C, Violi IL, Gargiulo J, Chiarelli G, Schumacher L, Jakobi J, Olmos-Trigo J, Cortes E, König M, Barcikowski S, Schlücker S, Saenz JJ, Maier SA, Stefani FD. Size-selective optical printing of silicon nanoparticles through their dipolar magnetic resonance. ACS Photon 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01619.

[235] Brzobohaty O, Chvatal L, Zemanek P. Optomechanical properties of optically self-arranged colloidal waveguides. Opt Lett 2019;44(3):707-10.

[236] Brzobohaty O, Chvatal L, Siler AJM, Kanka J, Jezek J, Zemanek P. Tunable soft-matter optofluidic waveguides assembled by light. ACS Photon 2019;6(2):403-10.

[237] Gong L, Wu Z, Gao M, Wang L, Wang Q, Li Y. Radiation forces exerted on redundant particles on an optical surface. Optik 2019;190:68-76.

[238] Zhang H, Han Y, Wang J, Guo J. Optical trapping forces on Rayleigh particles by a focused Bessel-Gaussian correlated schell-model beam. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;235:309-16.

[239] Alinezhad HG, Reihani SNS. Optimal condition for optical trapping of large particles: Tuning the laser power and numerical aperture of the objective. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2019;36(11):3053-9.

[240] Ju W, Yao J, Ding H-P, Wu D-J. Optical radiation forces of focused Gaussian beams on the three-layered microgel particles with near-infrared responses. Appl Phys A 2019;125: 82.

[241] Lin Y, Leartprapun N, Adie S. Spectroscopy photonic force optical coherence elastography. Opt Lett 2019;44(19):4897-900.

[242] Rafferty A, Gorkowski K, Zuend A, Preston TC. Optical deformation of single aerosol particles. PNAS Latest Art 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907687116.

[243] Herranen J, Markkanen J, Videen G, Muinonen K. Non-spherical particles in optical tweezers: A numerical solution. Plos One 2019;14(12):0225773.

[244] Yu X, Jiang Y, Chen H, Liu S, Li Z. Approach to fully decomposing an optical force into conservative and nonconservative components. Phys Rev A 2019;100:033821.

[245] Ha G, Zheng H, Yu X, Lin Z. Polarization effect on optical manipulation in a three-beam optical lattice. Phys Rev A 2019;100:033817.

[246] Ge C-X, Wu Z-S, Bai J, Gong L. Numerical study of optical trapping properties of nanoparticle on metallic film with periodic structure. Chin Phys B 2019;28(2):024203.

[247] Zheng H, Yu X, Lu W, Ng J, Lin Z. ZGforce: Decomposition of optical force into gradient and scattering parts. Comput Phys Comm 2019;237:188-98.

[248] Mitri FG. Radiation force and torque on perfect electrically-conducting (PEC) corrugated circular and elliptical cylinders in TE or TM polarized plane progressive waves with arbitrary incidence. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;235:15-23.

[249] Mitri FG. Optical radiation force (per-length) on an electrically conducting elliptical cylinder having a smooth or ribbed surface. OSA Continuum 2019;2(2):298-313.

[250] Mitri FG. Optical radiation force expression for a cylinder exhibiting rotary polarization in plane quasi-standing, standing, or progressive waves. J Opt Soc Amer A 2019;36(5):768-74.

[251] Mitri FG. Electromagnetic radiation force on a perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) circular cylinder. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;21-28:233.

[252] Mitri FG. Induced radiation force of an optical line source on a cylinder material exhibiting circular dichroism. J Opt Soc Amer A 2019;36(10):1648-56.

[253] Mitri FG. Radiation force and torque of light-sheets illuminating a cylindrical particle of arbitrary geometrical cross-section exhibiting circular dichroism. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2020;255:107242.

[254] Mitri FG. Optical TM-TE conversion contribution to the radiation force on a cylinder exhibiting rotary polarization in circularly polarized light. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;253. Paper 107115.

[255] Vaippuli R, Gummaluri VS, Vijayan C, Roy B. Validity of cylindrical approximation for spherical birefringent microparticles in rotational optical tweezers. J Phys Commun 2020;4:015005.

[256] Bai J, Ge C-X, Wu Z-S. Stability and dynamics of chiral nanoparticles in lateral optical binding induced by high-order Bessel beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;243:106824.

[257] Mitri FG. Radiation force and torque on an elliptical cylinder illuminated by a TE-polarized non-paraxial focused Gaussian light sheet with arbitrary incidence. J Opt Soc Amer A 2020;37(2):265-75.

[258] Mitri FG. Dynamic oscillatory radiation force in optical heterodyning. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;250:106994.

[259] Mitri FG, Li RX, Sun H. Optical radiation force on a perfect electromagnetic (PEMC) sphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;256:107280.

[260] Chen H, Zheng H, Lu W, Liu S, Ng J, Lin Z. Lateral optical force due to the breaking of electric-magnetic symmetry. Phys Rev Lett 2020;125:073901.

[261] Vennes B, Preston TC. Optical deformation of homogeneous and core-shell spherical particles. Phys Rev A 2020;101:063812.

[262] Ohwal A, Boruah D, Belgamwar SU. Establishment of an optical trapping curve for prediction of trapping parameters. Optik 2020;208:164434.

[263] Lin Y, Leartprapun N, Adie SG. High-throughput light-sheet optical manipulation and measurement with optical coherence tomography. Biophoton Congr: Biomed Opt 2020.

[264] Devi A, De AK. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for the reversal of optical force in a nonlinear laser trap. Phys Rev A 2020;102:023509.

[265] Yadav S, Devi A, De AK. Reversal in axial symmetry of nonlinear optical trapping potential for metallic nanoparticles: Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. Proc SPIE 2020;XVII. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2570664.

[266] Yadav S, Devi A, De AK. Synergistic effect of Fano resonance and optical nonlinearity in laser trapping of silver nanoparticles. Phys Rev A 2020;102. Paper 043511.

[267] Song N, Wei B, Li R, Sun H, Wei B, Zhang S, Zhang J, Mitri FG. Optical torque on an absorptive dielectric sphere of arbitrary size illuminated by a linearly-polarized Airy light-sheet. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;256:107327.

[268] Devi A, Yadav S, De AK. Nonlinear trap: Dielectrics, metals and beyond. Proc SPIE 2020;XVII:11463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2575027.

[269] Song N, Li R, Sun H, Zhang J, Wei B, Zhang S, Mitri FG. Optical radiation force on a dielectric sphere of arbitrary size illuminated by a linearly polarized Airy light-sheet. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;245:106853.

[270] Xu X, Nieto-Vesperinas M, Qiu C-W, Liu X, Gao D, Zhang Y, Li B. Kerker-type intensity-gradient force of light. Laser Photon Rev 2020;1900265.

[271] Zheng H, Li X, Jiang Y, Ng J, Lin Z, Chen H. General formulations for computing the optical gradient and scattering forces on a spherical chiral particle immersed in generic monochromatic optical fields. Phys Rev A 2020;101. Paper 053830.

[272] Shi H, Zheng H, Chen H, Lu W, Liu S, Lin Z. Optical binding and lateral forces on chiral particles in linearly polarized plane waves. Phys Rev A 2020;101:043808.

[273] Ha G, Zheng H, Yu X, Lin Z. Analytically decomposing optical force on a spherical particle in Bessel beams into conservative and non-conservative parts. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2020;37(1):67-73.

[274] Tian L, Chen L, Zhang P, Bi L. Estimating radiative forcing efficiency of dust aerosol based on direct satellite observations: Case studies over the Sahara and Taklimak desert. Atmos Chem Phys 2021;21:11669-87.

[275] Neves AAR, Moreira WL, Fontes A, Euser TG, Cesar CL. Toward waveguide-based optical chromatography. Front Phys Opt Photon 2021;8.

[276] Donato MG, Patti F, Saija R, Iati MA, Gucciardi PG, Pedaci F, Strangi G, Maragò OM. Improved backscattering detection in photonic force microscopy near dielectric surfaces with cylindrical vector beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;258:107381, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[277] Gouesbet G. Van de Hulst essay: A review on generalized Lorenz-Mie theories with wow stories and epistemological discussion. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;253:107117.

[278] Shahabadi V, Madadi E, Abdollahpour D. Optimized anti-reflection core-shell microspheres for enhanced optical trapping by structured light beams. Sci Rep 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84665-0.

[279] de Angelis VS, Ambrosio LA, Zamboni-Rached M. Simulations of optical forces by a microstructured continuous superposition of first-order nonparaxial Bessel beams on Rayleigh particles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;261:107481.

[280] Zhu X, Li N, Yang J, Chen X, Hu H. Revolution of a trapped particle in counter-propagating dual-beam optical tweezers under low pressure. Opt Express 2021;29(7):11169-80.

[281] Mitri FG. Optical trapping of a perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) sphere exhibiting rotary polarization using nonparaxial focused Gaussian single-beam tweezers. Resul Opt 2021;4:100089.

[282] Mitri FG, Tang H, Li R, Gong S. Interaction of circularly polarized light with an absorptive electromagnetic conductor sphere - Radiation force and torque. Res Opt 2021;5:100128.

[283] Li W, Hu H, Su H, Zhu Q, Li N. Numerical analysis on the optical force calculation in the Rayleigh regime. Opt Rev 2021;28:1-7.

[284] Soleimani A, Zakery A. Using multi-beam optical tweezers to create optical lattices and manipulate microparticles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;272:107831.

[285] Wu H, Zhang X, Zhang P, Jia P, Wang Z, Hu Y, Chen Z, Xu J. Optical pulling force arising from nonparaxial accelerating beams. Phys Rev A 2021;103:053511.

[286] Li W, Zhang H, Hu M, Zhu Q, Su H, Li N, Hu H. 3D calibration of microsphere position in optical tweezers using the back-focal-plane interferometry method. Opt Express 2021;29(20):32271-84.
[287] Bai J, Liu X, Han X-Y, Ge C-X, Dong J. Interactions between stratified chiral particles optically trapped in high-order Bessel beams. In: Proceedings volume 12057, twelfth international conference on information optics and photonics (SPIE). 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2605815.

[288] Devi A, De AK. Unified treatment of nonlinear force in laser trapping of dielectric particles of varying sizes. Phys Rev Res 2021;3:033074.

[289] Gouesbet G. Comments on "unified treatment of nonlinear optical force in laser trapping of dielectric particles of varying sizes" by Anita Devi and Arijit K De. Phys Rev Res 2022;4:038001.

[290] Rafferty A, Preston TC. Trapping positions in a dual-beam optical trap. J Appl Phys 2021;130(18):183105.

[291] Zhang H, Li W, Li N, Hu H. Numerical analysis of optical trapping force affected by lens misalignments. Photonics 2021;8:548. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120548.

[292] Xiu Z, Zhang Y, Shi H, Zheng H, Chen H, Lu W, Lin Z. Lateral optical force along the translationally invariant direction of optical fields formed by circularly polarized plane waves. Phys Rev A 2021;104:053520.

[293] Zhang Y, Xiu Z, Fan X, Li R, Chen H, Zheng H, Lu W, Lin Z. Enhanced transverse optical gradient force on Rayleigh particles in two plane waves. Opt Express 2022;30(2):2143-55.

[294] Nalupurackal G, Gunaseelan M, Lokesh M, Vaippully R, Chauhan A, Nanda BRK, Sudakar C, Kotamarthi HC, Jannasch A, Schiffer E, Senthilselvan J, Roy B. Simultaneous optical trapping and magnetic micromanipulation of ferromagnetic iron-doped upconversion microparticles in six degrees of freedom. 2022, arXiv:2203.02152v2 [physics.optics].

[295] Chen Z, Xiong W, Kuang T, Peng M, Zeng X, Han X, Chen X, Xiao G, Luo H. Enhancing the performance of the counter-propagating dual-beam optical trap with the asymmetric configuration. Eur Phys J D 2022;76(68):13.

[296] Devi A, Sikdar B, De AK. Revisiting nonlinear optical trapping of a single nanoparticle using generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. Phys Rev A 2022;105:053529.

[297] Kincaid PS, Porcelli A, Neves AAR, Arimondo E, Camposeo A, Pisignano D, Ciampini D. Size-dependent optical forces on dielectric microspheres in hollow core photonic crystal fibers. Opt Express 2022;30(14):24407-20.

[298] Yan B, Ling X, Li R, Zhang J, Liu C. Optical force and torque on a graphene-coated gold nanosphere by a vector Bessel beam. Micromachines 2022;13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi130456.

[299] Edelstein S, Garcia-Martin A, Serena PA, Marqués MI. Circular dichroism in magneto-optical forces. Opt Express 2022;30(16):28668-85.

[300] Tang H, Wei B, Li R, Yang L, Gong S, Yang R, Zhu Z, Mitri FG. Radiation force and torque caused by the interaction between arbitrary-shaped optical polarized beams and a PEMC sphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;296:108436.

[301] Wu Z, Zhao J, Dou J, Liu J, Jing Q, Li B, Hu Y. Optical trapping of multiple particles based on a rotationally-symmetric power-exponent-phase vortex beam. Opt Express 2022;30(24):42892-901.

[302] Andrew P-K, Raudsepp A, Nock W, Fan D, Williams MAK, Stauffer U, Avci E. Developing an optical microlever for stable and unsupported force amplification. In: Proceedings of MARSS -International conference on manipulation, automation and robotics at small scales. 2022.

[303] Yu J, Xu Y, Lin S, Zhu X, Gbur G, Cai Y. Longitudinal optical trapping and manipulating Rayleigh particles by spatial nonuniform coherence engineering. Phys Rev A 2022;196:033511.

[304] Chen H, Feng Lv, Ma J, Liang C, Lin Z, Zheng H. Left-handed optical torque on dipolar plasmonic nanoparticles induced by Fano-like resonance. Phys Rev B 2022;106(Article 054301).

[305] Chen S, Parker JA, Peterson CW, Rice SA, Scherer NF, Ferguson AL. Understanding and design of non-conservative optical matter systems using Markov state models. Mol Syst Des Eng 2022;7:1228-38.

[306] Song N, Wei B, Li R, Yang R, Zhang S. Optical spin torque on a magnetodielectric Dielectric sphere illuminated by an Airy light-sheet. In: Lecler S, Astratov VN, Minin IV, editors. Proceedings of SPIE. Mesophotonics: physics and systems at mesoscale, vol. 12152, 2022, 1215208.

[307] Zhang S, Wei B, Wei Q, Li R, Song N. Radiation force of Bessel pincer light-sheets on a nanoscale dielectric sphere. In: Lecler S, Astratov VN, Minin IV, editors. Proceedings of SPIE. Mesophotonics: physics and systems at mesoscale, vol. 12152, 2022, 115207.

[308] Joshi V, Bowling A. Investigation of the power spectral density of a scaled model simulation of an optical tweezer. In: Dholakia K, Spalding GC, editors. Proceedings of SPIE. Optical trapping and optical micromanipulation XIX, vol. 12198, 2022, 121980G.

[309] Joshi V, Goodwin PM, Bowling A. Power spectral density analysis of a scalar model simulation of an optical tweezer. Opt Eng 2022;61(10):104103.

[310] Tang H, Sun H, Li R, Yang L, Song N, Zhang S, Wei B, Zhu Z, Wei B, Gong S, Mitri FG. Optical radiation force on a dielectric sphere by a polarized Airy beam. J Opt Soc Amer A 2022;39(11):2090-103.

[311] Alinezhad HG, Mahdavi SM, Reihani SN. Optimal in-depth trapping by tuning the correction collar of a dry objective lens. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2022;39(12):3209-15.

[312] Yadav S, Devi A, De A. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory of nonlinear optical trapping of core/shell hybrid nanoparticles. In: Proceedings of SPIE, 12017, complex light and optical forces XVI, 120170D. 2022.

[313] Zhou Z-I, Zhang S-H, Zhou Y, Han Y-S, Zhou Z-X, Ya B-L, Qu J. Radiation force of a special correlated beam with off-axis multiple vortices on Rayleigh particles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;302:108580.

[314] Tang H, Li R, Gong S, Yang L, Yang L, Wei B, Zhu Z, Mitri FG, Guo X, He X. Radiation force and torque on an absorptive electromagnetic conductor sphere by an arbitrary-shaped optical polarized beam. Opt Commun 2023;537:129419.

[315] Oliveira KM, Moura TA, Lucas JLC, Teixeira AVNC, Rocha MS, Mendes JBS. On the use of organic semiconductors as handles for optical tweezers experiments: Trapping and manipulating polyaniline (PANI) microparticles. 2023, arXiv: 2303.02754v1 [physics.optics].

[316] Savelyev DA, Karpeev SV. Development of 3D microstructures for the formation of a set of optical traps on the optical axis. Photonics 2023;10(117).

[317] Li P, Wan L, Yao H, Talwar DN, Li L, Jiang J. Optical torque exerted on a charged sphere by a polarized Bessel beam. Symmetry 2023;15(128).

[318] Mandal A, Lee E, Luo T. Analytical model of optical force on supercavitating plasmonic nanoparticles. Opt Express 2023;31(13):21972-87.

[319] Zhou X, Liu S, Zhao D. Rigorous full-wave calculation of optical forces on microparticles immersed in vector Pearcey beams. Opt Express 2023;31(13):20825-35.

[320] Ma J, Feng L, Sun Z, Fan X, Ge L, Lin Z, Zheng H, Chen H. Bipolar optical force on a dipolar nanoparticle: Thermally induced switching between optical pulling and optical pushing. Phys Rev B 2023;108:134308.

[321] Zeng Z, Li X, Wang H, Xie C. Optical patterning fullerene nanostructures with high purity and high surface quality. APL Photon 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0152366.

[322] Bai J, Ge C-X, Wu Z-S. Optical trapping of chiral particles by dual laser beams. Photonics 2023;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/photonics10080905.

[323] Sadafi MM, Taghavi M, da Mota AF, Mosallaei H. Optical manipulation of nanoparticles: A selective excitation approach using highly focused orbital angular momentum beams. Adv Photon Res 2023;2200242.

[324] Tiwari R, Chowdury SR, Ghosh N, Haldar D, Banerjee A. Hybrid bioinspired strongly coupled waveguides using optical manipulated micro-robots. J Lightwave Technol 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2023.3339431.

[325] Guzatov DV. Light pressure of the Bessel beam on a spherical particle: An analytical solution. Bull Lebedev Phys Inst 2023;50(Suppl. 5):8572-86.

[326] Lu X, Tan L, Liu N, Chen C, Chen K, Wu H, Xia X, Zhang P, Hong P, Zou B, Liang Y. Optical trapping performance of circular Pearcey beams on Mie particles. Phys Rev A 2023;108(Article 063509).

[327] Ambrosio LA. Photophoresis in the slip-flow and free molecular regimes for arbitrary-index particles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2020;255:107276, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[328] Ambrosio LA. Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory in the analysis of longitudinal photophoresis of arbitrary-index particles: On-axis axisymmetric beams of the first kind. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;275:107889.

[329] Ambrosio LA, Wang J, Gouesbet G. Towards photophoresis with the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;288:108266.

[330] Sun Y, Wang J, Yu Q, Wang H, Briard P, Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Longitudinal and transverse photophoretic force on a homogeneous sphere exerted by a Bessel beam with selective polarization. Appl Opt 2022;61(26):7632-43.

[331] Wang H, Wang J, Dong W, Han Y, Ambrosio LA, Liu L. Theoretical prediction of photophoretic force on a dielectric sphere illuminated by a circularly symmetric high-order Bessel beams: On-axis case. Opt Express 2021;29(17):26894-908.

[332] Mitri FG. Longitudinal and transverse PAFs for an absorptive magneto-dielectric circular cylinder in light-sheets of arbitrary wavefronts and moagnetization. Appl Opt 2021;60(26):7937-43.

[333] Mitri FG. Optical Magnus effect in the photophoresis of a spinning absorptive dielectric circular cylinder. Appl Opt 2022;61(5):1203-11.

[334] Moura TA, Andrade UMS, Mendes JBS, Rocha MS. Modulating the trapping and manipulation of semiconductor particles using Bessel beam optical tweezers. Opt Laser Eng 2023;170:107778.

[335] Mitri FG. Photophoretic asymmetry factors for an absorptive dielectric cylinder near a reflecting planar boundary. J Opt Soc Amer A 2021;38:1901-10.

[336] Mitri FG. Effect of a perfectly conducting corner space on the PAFs for an absorptive dielectric circular cylinder. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2021;38:3910-9.

[337] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G, Wang J. On analytical solutions to classes of definite integrals with products of Bessel functions of the first kind and their derivatives. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;293:198387.

[338] Ambrosio LA, Wang J, Gouesbet G. On a class of definite integrals with products of (Riccati-) Bessel functions and their derivatives. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;299:108512.

[339] Gouesbet G, Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel S, Gréhan G. Periodic orbits in Hamiltonian chaos of the annular billiard. Phys Rev E 2001;65(1):1-18, Art 016212.

[340] Gouesbet G, Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel S, Gréhan G. Morphology-dependent resonances and/or whispering gallery modes for a two-dimensional dielectric cavity with an eccentrically located spherical inclusion, a Hamiltonian point of view with Hamiltonian (optical) chaos. Opt Commun 2002;201(4-6):223-42.

[341] Kolwas K. Decay dynamics of localized surface plasmons: Damping of coherences and populations of the oscillatory plasmon modes. Plasmonics 2019;14:1629-73.
[342] Sun H, Li R, Song N, Zhang S, Wei B, Zhang J. Optical resonance scattering of a dielectric sphere of arbitrary size illuminated by polarized Airy beams. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;245:106858.

[343] Abad-Arredondo J, Garcia-Vidal FJ, Zhang Q, Khwaja E, Menon VM, Grimm J, Fernandez-Dominguez AJ. Fluorescence triggered by radioactive beta decay in optimized hyperbolic cavities. Phys Rev A 2020;14:024084.

[344] Wang P, Shen X, Zhang H, Xu O, He P, Wang H, Ma S, ad Q. Jiang Z Guo, Gu N, Sun J. Assembly-induced microwave band resonance in gold nanoparticles-based ultrathin and flexible spoof localized surface plasmon. Mater Des 2021;204:109622.

[345] Zambrana-Puyalto X, D'Ambrosio D, Gagliardi G. Excitation mechanisms of whispering gallery modes with direct light scattering. Laser Photonics Rev 2021;15(5):2000528.

[346] Koushki E. Effect of conjugation with organic molecules on the surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles and application in optical biosensing. RSC Adv 2021;11:23390.

[347] Marhaba S, Samad SE. Interparticle distance effect on the optical response of platinum dimer nanoparticles. Chem Africa 2021;4:477-82.

[348] Song N, Wei B, Li R, Zhang S, Wei B, Sun H, Gong S, Mitri FG, Wu Y. Optical resonance and rainbow scattering of an electromagnetic Airy light-sheet by a dielectric sphere of arbitrary size. Res Opt 2021;5:100143.

[349] Tiwari P, Mandal A, Dantham VR. Sensitivity of whispering gallery modes with different physical parameters of hollows microspheres: A theoretical study. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2021;38(8):2312-22.

[350] D'Ambrosio D, Zambrana-Puyalto X, Capezzuto M, Giorgini A, Malara M, Avino S, Gagliardi G. Angular-momentum coupling of optical whispering-gallery modes to liquid droplet microresonators. Phys Rev A 2021;104. Paper 043504.

[351] Luo S, Wang S, Zhu YY, Zhu E, Li ZZ. Directional light scattering by germanium trimer and its metasurface structure under the substrate effects. Opt Commun 2022;507:127606.

[352] Sun Y, Xu P, Gao L, Miroshnichenko AE, Gao D. Wavelength-scale spin hall shift of light with morphology-enhanced scattering efficiency from nanoparticles. Laser Photon Rev 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202200289.

[353] Hoang TX, Chu H-S, Garcia-Vidal FJ, Png CE. High-performance dielectric nano-cavities for near- and mid-infrared frequency applications. J Opt 2022;24(9):094006.

[354] Sedeh HB, Pires DG, Chandra N, Gao J, Tsvetkov D, Terekhov P, Kravchenko I, Litchinitser N. Manipulation of scattering spectra with topology of light and matter. Laser Photon Rev 2023;17:2200472.

[355] Kaur J, Vairagi K, Minz RA, Enoch S, Mondal SK. Encaved optical fiber nano-antenna exciting morphology dependent shape resonance with focused off-axis beam. Opt Express 2023;31:17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.495702.

[356] Sarita, Jha R, Singh RK. Tightly focused linearly and radially polarized beam effect on the LSPR peak with varying particle size. Phys Scr 2023;98(11):115523.

[357] Esmaillastidjerdpour P, Shahshahani F. The optical fiber biosensor enhancement consisting of nanocomposite by using graphene in medical application. Plasmonics 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11468-02044-z.

[358] Minin OV, Zhou S, Minin IV. Optical super-resonances in mesoscale dielectric cenospheres: Giant magnetic field generations. Ann Phys, Lpz 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.202300337.

[359] Tang L, Liao C, Guo Y, Zhang Y. Controllable preparation of Ag-SiO2 composite nanoparticles and their applications in fluorescence enhancement. Materials 2023;16(201).

[360] Stollberger FW, Gleichweit MJ, David G, Signorell R, Bergmann A. Direct influence of aerosol particles on cavity enhanced spectroscopy: Modeling and first experimental results. Aerosol Sci Technol 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2023.229810.

[361] Swetha BB, Devarajulu G, Keshavamurthy K, Jagannath G, Deepa HR. Enhanced 1.53µm emission of $Er^{3+}$ in nano-Ag embedded sodium-boro-lanthanates glasses. J Alloys Compd 2020;856:158212.

[362] Swetha BN, Keshavamurthy K, Pramod AG, Devarajulu G, Roopa KP, Patwari DR, Kebaii I, ben Ahmed S, Sayyed MI, Khan S, ramesh P, Sathish KN, Fatima N, Annapiurna K, Jagannath G. Improved photoluminescence and spectroscopic features of $Sm^{3+}$-doped alkali borate glasses by embedding silver nanoparticles. J Non-Crystall Solids 2022;579:121371.

[363] Han L, Han YP, Gouesbet G, Wang J, Gréhan G. Photonic jet generated by spheroidal particle with Gaussian-beam illumination. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2014;31(7):1476-83.

[364] Chen Z, Taflove A, Backman V. Photonic nanojet enhancement of backscattering of light by nanoparticles: a potential novel visible-light ultramicroscopy technique. Opt Express 2004;12:1214-20.

[365] Itagi A, Challener W. Optics of photonic nanojets. J Opt Soc Amer A 2005;22:2847-58.

[366] Cui X, Erni D, Hafner C. Optical forces on metallic nanoparticles induced by a photonic nanojet. Opt Express 2008;16:13560-8.

[367] Valdivia-Valero F, Nieto-Vesperinas M. Optical forces on cylinders near subwavelengths slits illuminated by a photonic nanojet. Opt Commun 2013;294:351-60.

[368] Wang Y-J, Dai C-A, Li J-H. Numerical study of tunable photonic nanojets generated by biocompatible hydrogel core-shell microspheres for surface-enhanced Raman scattering applications. Polymers 2019;11(431).

[369] Chen R, Lin J, Jin P, Cada M, Ma Y. Photonic nanojet beam shaping by illumination polarization engineering. Opt Commun 2019;456:124593.

[370] Uenohara T, Mizutani Y, Takaya Y. Comparison of intensity distribution of photonic nanojet according to Gaussian beam and radially polarization beam incidence. Precis Eng 2019;60:274-9.

[371] Wei B, Li R, Zhang S, Zhang J, Xu Q, Song N. Photonic jet generated by a dielectric ellipsoidal particle. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;242:106786.

[372] Liu C-Y, Chung H-J, Minin OV, Minin IV. Shaping photonic hook via well-controlled illumination of finite-size graded-index micro-ellipsoid. J Opt 2020;22(8):085002.

[373] Mandal A, Dantham VR. Short and elongated photonic nanojets emerged from single solid/hollow core-shell microparticles illuminated by focused Gaussian beams and plane wave. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;257:107350.

[374] Zhu L, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang T, Guo J, Han Y, Briard P. Photonic jet generated by a dielectric spheroid with Bessel beam excitation. In: Proceedings volume 11717, 24th national laser conference and fifteenth national conference on laser technology and optoelectronics. 2020. 117173R.

[375] Huang J, Zhao Y, Yang H, Wang J, Briard P, Han Y. Characteristics of photonic jets generated by a dielectric sphere illuminated by a Gaussian beam. Appl Opt 2020;59(21):6390-8.

[376] Cheng Y, Shen J. Curved photonic jet produced from a spherical particle illuminated by a Bessel-Gaussian beam. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;272:107765.

[377] Jia Y, Li R, Zhuang W, Liang J. Photonic nanojet generated by a spheroidal particle illuminated by a vector Bessel beam. Resul Opt 2021;4:100106.

[378] Yousefi M, Scharf T, Rossi M. Photonic nanojet generation under converging and diverging beams. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2021;38(2):317-26.

[379] Yousefi M, Necesal D, Scharf T, Rossi M. Structured light engineering using a photonic nanojet. 2021, arXiv:2103.17179v1.

[380] Zhang C, Lin J. The design of a novel device for photonic jet (in Chinese). Opt Instrum 2021;43(5):25-32.

[381] Mandal A, Tiwari P, Upputuri PK, Dantham VR. Characteristic parameters of photonic nanojets of single dielectric microspheres illuminated by focused broadband radiation. Sci Rep 2022;12:173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03610-3.

[382] Gasparic V, Ristic D, Mayerhöfer TG, Baran N, Gebavi H, Maksimovic A, Ivanda M. Photonic nanojet of a Gaussian beam illuminated low refractive index microsphere in air: A comprehensive variation of parameters. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;282:108121.

[383] Wu F, Wang J, Cui Z, Aihoon S, Briard P, Han Y. Polarization-sensitive photonic jet of a dielectric sphere excited by a zero-order Bessel beam. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;280:108093.

[384] Joshi P, Dantham V. Theoretical study on photonic nanojet-assisted fluorescence microscopic technique. In: Proceedings of SPIE 12638. Women in Optics and Photonics in India, (doi: 10.1117/12.2670031). 2022.

[385] Chen Y-H, Yang Y-J, Zhang D-L. Photonic jet generated by symmetry four Airy beams illumination. Opt Commun 2023;549:129917.

[386] Karamehmedovic M, Glückstad J. Phase-only steerable photonic nanojets. Opt Express 2023;31(17):27255-65.

[387] Tang H, Shi Z, Zhang Y, Li R, Wei B, Gong S, He X, Yang L, Yan B, Sun H, Mitri FG. Scattering of a radially polarized Bessel beam by a Pemc sphere: Photonic nanojet and bottle beam formation. Appl Opt 2023;62:9164-74.

[388] Gouesbet G, Marston PL. Failures of the classical optical theorem under arbitrary-shaped beam incidence in electromagnetism, acoustics, and quantum mechanics: Motivation and a review. Front Phys 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1271555.

[389] Rondon I, Lee J. Generalized optical theorem for Rayleigh scattering approximation. Modern Phys Lett B 2021;35(6). id.215 0114.

[390] Zhang S, Zhang W, Dong J, Liu L. Optical theorem of an infinite circular cylinder in weakly absorbing media. Phys Rev A 2022;105(Article 023516).

[391] Zhang L. Generalized optical theorem for an arbitrary incident field. J Acoust Soc Am 2019;145:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5092581.

[392] Markel VA. Extinction of electromagnetic waves. Springer series in light scattering, Vol. 9, Springer; 2023.

[393] Gouesbet G. A scientific story of generalized Lorenz-Mie theories with epistemological remarks. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2013;126:7-15.

[394] Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, editors. Proceedings of the international symposium: Optical particle sizing, theory and practice, held in Rouen, 12-15 may, 1987. Plenum Publishing Corporation; 1988.

[395] Gouesbet G, Brunel M. Lasers and interactions with particles: 2012: Optical particle characterization follow-up. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2013;126:1-6.

[396] Gouesbet G, Onofri FRA. Preface: Laser-light and interactions with particles (LIP), 2014. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;162:1-7.

[397] Gouesbet G, Onofri FRA. Laser-light and interactions with particles (LIP), 2016. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2017;195:1-7.
[398] Gouesbet G, Yang P, Onofri FRA. Afterword. Laser-light and interactions with particles (LIP), 2018. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;225:258-77.

[399] Gouesbet G, Onofri FRA. Preface. Laser-light and interactions with particles (LIP) 2020. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;268:107635.

[400] Gouesbet G, Onofri FRA. Editorial, special issue: Laser-light and interactions with particles (LIP), 2020. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;274:107857.

[401] Onofri FRA, Gouesbet G, Kolwas M, Jakubczyk D. Editorial, laser-light and interactions with particles, LIP. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;108710.

[402] Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Naqwi A, Durst F. Trajectory ambiguities in phase Doppler systems: use of polarizers and additional detectors to suppress the effect. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, and workshop on computers in flow measurements, lisbon, July 20th-23th. 1992.

[403] Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Naqwi A, Durst F. Particle trajectory effects in phase-Doppler systems: Computations and experiments. Part Part Syst Charact 1993;10(6):332-8.

[404] Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Naqwi A, Durst F. Trajectory ambiguities in phase-Doppler systems: Study of a near-forward and a near-backward geometry. Part Part Syst Charact 1994;11(2):133-44.

[405] Mignon H, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Xu TH, Tropea C. Measurement of cylindrical particles with phase-Doppler anemometry. Appl Opt 1996;35,25:5180-90.

[406] Azarskov VM, Dyvnych VM. Unmanned aerial vehicles velocimeter. In: 2019 IEEE 5th international conference actual problems of unmanned aerial vehicles developments. 2021, p. 186-8.

[407] Dafsari RA, Vashahi F, Chandrahasan R, Lee J. Effect of aviation fuel temperature on refractive index in droplet size measurement using phase Doppler anemometry. Meas Sci Technol 2019;30(7):075203.

[408] Akinyemi OS, Qavi I, Taylor CE, Jiang L. Effects of the air-to-liquid mass ratio on the internal flow and near-field spray characteristics of a two-phase swirl burst injector. J Aerosol Sci 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aerosci.2022.106092.

[409] Zhang H, He Y, Li Z, Chen X, Dai G, Yin B, Tang J, Chen W, Wu S. Dual wavelength laser Doppler anemometer for simultaneous velocity and particulate size distribution measurements in submarine environments. Opt Express 2023;31(8):12311-27.

[410] Bardera R, Rodriguez-Sevillano AA, Munoz-Campillejo J, Matias-Garcia JC, Barroso-Barderas E. Laser Doppler measurements of the flow around the wind sensors of a planetary exploration vehicle. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04443-z.

[411] Zhou J, Fang Y, Wang J, Zhu L, Wriedt T. Rainbow pattern analysis of a multilayered sphere for optical diagnostic of a heating droplet. Opt Commun 2019;441:113-20.

[412] Li C, Lv Q, Wu Y, Wu X, Tropea C. Measurement of transient evaporation of an ethanol droplet stream with phase rainbow refractometry and high-speed microscopic shadowgraphy. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020;146:118843.

[413] Cao Y, Wang W, Yu H, Shen J, Tropea C. Characterization of refractive index and size of a spherical drop by using Gaussian beam scattering in the secondary rainbow region. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;242:106785.

[414] Li C, Wu Y, Wu X, Tropea C. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index, diameter and colloid concentration of a droplet using rainbow refractometry. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;245:106384.

[415] Li C, Lv Q, Li N, Wu Y, Wu X, Weng C, Tropea C. Dual-wavelength extinction rainbow refractometry for in situ characterization of colloidal droplets. Powder Technol 2022;339:117098.

[416] Kanjanasakul C, Grisch F, Saengkaw S, Gréhan G. Optical characterization of ethan droplets in the vicinity of critical pressure. Oil Gas Sci Technol 2020;75(59):1-15.

[417] Tufaile A, Tufaile APB. Halo dynamics: From rainbows to black holes. In: 13th chaotic modeling and simulation international cooperation. conference proceedings. 2020, 9-12 June.

[418] Li C, Lv Q, Li N, Wu Y, Wu X, Weng C, Tropea C. Planar rainbow refractometry. Opt Lett 2021;46(23):5898-901.

[419] Wang W, Wang J, Zhang Y. Droplet characterization based on the simulated secondary rainbows. Opt Photon J 2021;11(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/opj. 2021.116011.

[420] Ni Z, Hespel C, Foucher F, Han K. Measurement of droplets size and temperature under different conditions by using rainbow technique. In: ICLASS 2021, 15th triennial international conference on liquid atomization and spray systems. 2021.

[421] Ni Z, Hespel C, Han K, Foucher F. Transient evaluations of the temperature and diameter of an evaporating droplet stream by using rainbow technique and simulation. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 2022;131:110531.

[422] Wang Z, Yu H, Wang J, Shen J. Möbius shifts associated with the third-order and the fourth-order rainbows of a spheroidal droplet computation. Appl Opt 2022;61(3):826-35.

[423] Wu Y, Wang X, Xu D, Wu X. Synthetic aperture rainbow refractometry for droplet refractive index and size measurement with long range: Standard and global models. Powder Technol 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022. 117873.

[424] Li Can, Huang X, Fan X, Kang Y, Li N, Weng C, Tropea C. A method for scattering angle calibration in the rainbow region using a droplet stream. Opt Express 2022;30(23):42260-75.

[425] Wang X, Wu Y, Xu D, Wen B, Lv Q, Wu X. Synthetic aperture rainbow refractometry. Opt Lett 2022;47(20):5272-5.

[426] Ni Z, Hespel C, Han K, Foucher F. Evaluations of the preferential evaporation of binary droplet by rainbow technique and simulation. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2022;136:110649.

[427] Chiewudomrat S, Saengkaw S, Gréhan G, Leveneur S, Estel L. Evaluation of refractive index gradients in droplets by rainbow technique: Application to CO2 capture by monoethanolamine aqueous spray. Exp Fluids 2022;63(153).

[428] Li C, Peng W, Kang Y, Fan X, Huang X, Li N, Weng C, Tropea C. Rainbow refractometry using partial rainbow signals. Opt Laser Technol 2023;158:108872.

[429] Li WPC, Li T, Huang L, Li N, Weng C. Anti-noise and denoising performance of global rainbow processing. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2023;304:198619.

[430] Middleton C, Hannel MD, Hollingsworth AD, Pine DJ, Grier DG. Optimizing the synthesis of monodisperse colloidal spheres using holographic particle characterization. Langmuir 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir. 9b00012.

[431] Berdeu A, Flasseur O, Mèès L, Denis L, Momey F, Olivier T, Grosjean N, Fournier C. Reconstruction of in-line holograms: Combining model-based and regularized inversion. Opt Express 2019;27(10):14951-68.

[432] Kasimberg PNO, Cheong FC, Ruffner DB, Blusewicz JM. Holographic characterization of protein aggregates in the presence of silicone oil and surfactants. J Pharmaceut Sci 2019;198:155-61.

[433] Wu Y, Zhang H, Wu X, Cen K. Dual-view tomographic particle holography: Modeling and light scattering effects. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;255:107232.

[434] Alexander R, Leahy B, Manoharan VN. Precise measurements in digital holography microscopy by modeling the optical train. J Appl Phys 2020;128:060902.

[435] Altman LE, Grier DG. Interpreting holographic molecular binding assays with effective medium theory. Biomed Opt Express 2020;11(9):5225-36.

[436] Snyder K, Quddus R, Hollingsworth AD, Kirshenbaum K, Grier DG. Holographic immunoassays: Direct detection of antibodies binding to colloidal spheres. Soft Matter 2020;16:10180-6.

[437] Coëtmellec S, Lebrun D, Brunel M, Janssen AJEM. Assessment about luneberg integrals and application to digital in-line holography. J Eur Opt Soc-Rapid Publ 2021;17:12.

[438] Song W, Liu Q, Zhang L, Han B, Zhang L. Real-time holographic quantitative measurement of vapor density distribution of suspended droplets. Appl Opt 2021;60(21):6103-15.

[439] Odete MA, Boltyanskiy R, Cheong FC, Philips L. Label-free viability assay using holographic video microscopy. Res Square 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/ rs.3.rs-1061709/v1.

[440] Boltyanski R, Odete MA, Cheong FC, Philips L.A. Label-free viability assay using in-line holographic video microscopy. Sci Rep 2022;12:12746.

[441] Abdulali R, Altman LE, Grier DG. Holographic tomography of fractal aggregates. 2022, arXiv:2208.033263v1 [cond-mat.soft].

[442] Abdulali R, Altman LE, Grier DG. Multi-angle holographic characterization of individual fractal aggregates. Opt Express 2022;30(21):38587-95.

[443] Brault D, Fournier C, Olivier T, Faure N, Dixneuf S, Thibon L, Mèès L, Denis L. Automatic numerical focus plane estimation in digital holographic microscopy using calibration beads. Appl Opt 2022;61(5).

[444] Belad S, Hattay J, Machhout M. Tele-holography: A new concept for lossless compression and transmission of inline digital holograms. Signal Image Video Process 2022;43.

[445] Brault D, Olivier T, Soulez F, Joshi S, Faure N, Fournier C. Accurate unsupervised estimation of aberrations in digital holographic microscopy for improved quantitative reconstruction. Opt Express 2022;30(21):38383-404.

[446] Brault D, Denis L, Dixneuf S, Olivier T, Faure N, Fournier C. Fast and robust pattern detection: Application to spherical bead location in holographic microscopy. 2022, EUSIPCO 2022.

[447] Onofri FRA, Lamadie F. Evaluation des contributions non diffractives à la formation et l'analyse des hologrammes de particules. In: CFTL 2022, 17ème congrès francophone de techniques laser, m.-r. vetrano, louvain, belgique. Sept 2022, p. 9.1, hal-03810096.

[448] Onofri FRA, Lamadie F. Digital in-line holography and the photonic jet method: Routines and graphical user interfaces to generate numerical standards with the Lorenz-Mie theory. In: 20th international symposium on the application of laser and imaging techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, July 11-14th. 2022.

[449] Olivier T, Brault D, Joshi S, Brard T, Brodoline A, Mèès L, Fournier C. Effects of some model approximations in the reconstructions of digital in-line holograms: Simulations, experiments on calibrated objects and model refinement assessment. In: Georges MP, Popescu G, Verrier N, editors. Proceedings of SPIE. Unconventional optical imaging III, vol. 12136, 2022, 1213603-1.

[450] Grier DG, Quddus R, Snyder K, Altman LE, Kirshenbaum K. Holographic molecular binding assays. In: Digital Holography and 3-D Imaging 2022. 2022.
[451] Altman LE, Grier DG. Holographic analysis of colloidal spheres sedimenting in horizontal slit pores. Phys Rev E 2022;106:044605.

[452] Noury R, Renoult M-C, Godard G, Lebrun D. Phase analysis for focus plane detection in digital inline holography: Application to three-dimensional locations of drops and threads in a beads-on-a-string structure. Appl Opt 2023;62(23):6241-52.

[453] Snyder K, Grier DG. Aberration compensation for enhanced holographic particle characterization. Opt Express 2023;31(21):35200-6.

[454] Brault D, Olivier T, Faure N, Dixneuf S, Kolytcheff C, Charmette E, Soulez F, Fournier C. Multispectral in-line hologram reconstruction with aberration compensation applied to gram-stained bacteria microscopy. Sci Rep 2023;23:14437.

[455] Fedorov AG, Mironov MP. Numerical simulation of wave propagation through a spherical particle within the framework of generalized Lorenz-Mie theory (in Russian). Vestnik of NEFU 2023;20(4):31-8.

[456] Ren KF, Lebrun D, Ozkul C, Kleitz A, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G. On the measurements of particles by imaging methods: Theoretical and experimental aspects. Part Part Syst Charact 1996;13(2):156-64.

[457] Wu Y, Lin Z, Wu X, Cen K. Dual-beam interferometric particle imaging for size measurement of opaque metal droplet. Powder Technol 2019;356:31-8.

[458] Shanblatt ER, Sung Y, Gupta R, Nelson BJ, Leng S, Graves WS, McCollough CH. Forward model for propagation-based X-ray phase contrast imaging in parallel- and cone-beam geometry. Opt Express 2019;27(4):4504-21.

[459] Shan L, Xu L, Cao L, Hong B, Zhao J, Wang D, Kong M. Inversion of particle size distribution based on iterative non-negative Philips-Whomey algorithm. Trans Inst Meas Control 2019;1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0142331219873737.

[460] Shan L, Xu L, Cao L, Hong B, Wang D, Guo T, Kong M. Inversion of particle size distribution using the artificial fish swarm algorithm. Techn Messen 2019;86(1):34-44.

[461] Sukhanovskii A, Batalov V, Stepanov R. Drawbacks of GPT and IPI measurement in dense sprays. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2019;103:29-36.

[462] Liu X, Tang Y, Zhou Y, Hu S. Investigation of microsphere-assisted super-resolution imaging. In: 9th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies: Meta-Surface-Wave and Planar Optics. Proc SPIE 2019;10841:1084107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2505744.

[463] Stilgoe AB, Loke VLY, Kashchuk AV, Nieminen TA, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H. Microscope images of strongly scattering objects via vectorial transfer matrices: Modeling and an experimental verification. Phys Rev A 2019;99. Paper 013818, 9 pages.

[464] Stepanov R, Batalov V, Sukhanovskii A. Droplet sizing in the spray of a fuel injector using wavelet analysis. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2019;581:012042.

[465] Qieni L, Zixuan L, Chunshuai F, Hao L. Simultaneous retrieval of particle size and refractive index by extended interferometric particle imaging technique. Opt Express 2020;28(2):2192-200.

[466] Lin Z, Wu Y, Wu X, Chen L, Cen K. Development of three configurations of dual-beam interferometric particle imaging for opaque metal droplet size measurement. Opt Laser Eng 2020;129:106069.

[467] Jobert G, Barritault P, Fournier M, Boutami S, Jobert D, Marchant A, Michelot J, Monsinjon P, Lienhard P, Nicoletti S. Miniature particulate matter counter and analyzer based on lens-free imaging of light scattering signatures with a holed image sensor. Sensors Actuators Rep 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2020.100010.

[468] Dohet-Eraly J, Mêès L, Olivier T, Dubois F, Fournier C. Analysis of three-dimensional objects in quantitative phase contrast microscopy: A validity study of the planar approximation for spherical particles. Proc SPIE: Unconventional optical imaging II 2020;11351-10Y. 10.117/12.2557852.

[469] Wu Y, Wang Q, Zhao CY. Three-dimensional droplet splashing dynamics measurement with a stereoscopic shadowgraph system. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2020;83:108576.

[470] Garcia-Magarino A, Sor S, Bardera R, Munoz-Campillejo J. Interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing method for long range measurements. Measurement 2021;168:108418.

[471] Xiong P, He S, Qiu F, Cheng Z, Quan X, Zhang X. Experimental and mathematical study on jet atomization and flash evaporation characteristics of droplets in a depressurized environment. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng 2021;123:185-98.

[472] Farhat M, Chinaud M, Nerisson P, Vauquelin O. Characterization of bubbles dynamics in aperiodic formation. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2021;180:121646.

[473] Cannaday AE, Hanna S, Hoelle J. A mobile angular scattering microscope for organelle size estimation. Rev Sci Instrum 2021;92:083702.

[474] Denneulin L, Momey F, Brault D, Debailleul M, Taddese AM, Verrier N, Haeberlé O. GSURE criterion for unsupervised regularized reconstruction in tomographic diffractive microscopy. J Opt Soc Amer A 2022;39(2):52-61.

[475] Jüngst N, Smallwood GJ, Kaiser SA. Visualization and image analysis of droplet puffing and micro-explosion in spray-flame synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles. Exp Fluids 2022;63(60).

[476] Sax C, Dreisbach M, Kriegseis J. Interferometric particle imaging for particle sizing in the front-, side-, and back-scatter region. 2023, arXiv:2303.16013v1 [physics.flu-dyn].

[477] Garcia S, Doublet P, Lempereur C, an M. Stiti Gillac, Berrocal E, Orain M. Optimization of planar LIF/Mie imaging for droplet sizing characterization of dilute sprays. Res Square 2023.

[478] Putz A, Hussels M, Gienger J. Glare points in laser flow cytometry. Prague, Czech Republic: PIERS; 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PIERS59004.2023. 10221566, 3-6 July.

[479] IV GC Brittain, Chen YQ, Martinez E, Tang VA, Renner TM, Langlois MA, Gulnik S. A novel semiconductor-based flow cytometer with enhanced light-scatter sensitivity for the analysis of biological nanoparticle. Sci Rep 2019;9:16039.

[480] Grillini F, Thomas J-B, George S. Comparison of imaging models for spectral unmixing in oil painting. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21(7):2471.

[481] Muraji KF, Linnemann AR, Fogliano V, Laswai HS, Capuano E. Nutritional quality and *in vitro* digestion of immature rice-based processed products. Food Funct 2020;11:7611-25.

[482] Kang S, Wang X, Roberts HM, Duller GAT, Song Y, Liu W, Zhang R, Liu X, Lan J. Increasing effective moisture during the holocene in the semiarid regions of the Yili Basin, Central Asia: Evidence from loess sections. Quat Sci Rev 2020;246:106553.

[483] Li Y, Song Y, Orozbaev R, Dong J, Li X. Moisture evolution in Central Asia since 26 ka: Insights from a Kyrgyz loess section, Western Tian Shan. Quat Sci Rev 2020;249:106604.

[484] Li Y, Song Y, Kaskaoutis D, Zan J, Orozbaev R, Tan L, Chen X. Aeolian dust dynamics in the Fergana Valley, Central Asia, since 30 ka inferred from loess deposits. Geosci Front 2021;12:101180.

[485] Zhao L, Hong H, Algeo TJ, Liu C, Lu A. Fusion of visible near-infrared and mid-infrared data for modelling key soil-forming processes in loess soils. Eur J Soil Sci 2021.

[486] Lee J-H, Hong S-K, Park H-K. Effects of deep cryogenic treatment for tungsten carbide-iron cemented carbide. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater 2021;100:105649.

[487] Loutati A, Odenwald P, Aktekin B, Sann J, Guillon O, Tietz F, Fattakhova-Rohlfigd D. Survey of zirconium-containing NaSICON-type solid-state Li+ ion conductors with the aim of increasing reduction stability by partial cation substitution. Batter Supercaps 2022;e202200327.

[488] Trejo REG, Rossainz BB, Torres JAG, Zavala AH. A study on the behavior of different low-cost particle counter sensors for PM-10 and PM-2.5 suspended air particles. 2022, p. 33-50, WITCOM 2022, CCIS 1659.

[489] An X, Li Z, Zude-Sasse M. Effect of cell size on mechanics of strawberry fruit issue. In: IEEE international workshop on metrology for agriculture and forestry. 2022.

[490] Beck-Broichsitter S, Gerriets MR, Neumann M, Kubat J-F, Dusek J. Spatial size distribution at intact sample surfaces of a Dystric Cambisol under forest use. J Hydrol Hydromech 2022;70(1):1-12.

[491] Zhang K, Tran I, Tan S. Characterization of particle-size-based homogeneity and mycotoxin distribution using laser diffraction particle size analysis. Toxins 2023;15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15070450.

[492] Rulko TA, Li B, Surhigh B, Mayer JM, Chandran RB. Optical measurements and flow modeling to characterize solid volume fractions in gravity-driven particle curtains. Sol Energy 2023;264:111989.

[493] Li Y, Liang P, Song Y, Li X, Yang S, Chen X, Zong X, Shukurov N, Li Y. Unraveling source-to-sink dust transport in Central and East Asia by identifying provenances of aeolian sediments. Atmos Res 2023;293:106929.

[494] Rao B, Shanmugam P, Ramachandran H. Inversion of volume scattering function for estimation of bubble size distribution in ocean waters. IEEE Access 2021;9:135069-78.

[495] Cannaday AE, Sorrells JE, Berger AJ. Angularly resolved, finely sampled elastic scattering measurements of single cells: Requirements for robust organelle size extractions. J Biomed Opt 2019;24(8):086502.

[496] Assmann S, Münsterjohann B, Huber FJT, Will S. Droplet sizing in spray flame synthesis using wide-angle light scattering (WALS). Appl Phys B 2020;129:92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-020-07443-2.

[497] Onofri FRA, Rodriguez-Ruiz I, Lamadie F. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip characterization of nano- to microparticles suspensions by light extinction spectrometry. Opt Express 2022;30(2):2981-90.

[498] Skidanenko AV, Avakyan LA, Kozinkina EA, Bugaev LA. An effect of internal structure of bimetallic nanoparticles on optical particles for AuAg/glass material. Fiz Tverdogo Tela 2019;61(1):115-22.

[499] Jiang M, Liu X, Han J, Wang Z, Xu M. Influence of properties on measuring a low-particulate-mass concentration by light extinction method. Fuel 2021;286:119460.

[500] Jiang M, Liu X, Han J, Zhou Z, Xu M. Measuring particle size and concentration of non-spherical particles by combined light extinction and scattering method. Measurement 2021;184:109911.

[501] Eneren P, Aksoy YT, Zhu Y, Koos E, Vetrano MR. Light extinction spectroscopy applied to polystyrene colloids: Sensitivity to complex refractive index uncertainties and to noise. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2021;261:107494, virtual special issue of LIP2020.

[502] Dey U, Hesselbarth J. Subwavelength particle spectroscopy by measurements of electromagnetic scattering at millimeter-wave frequency. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2022;70(1):699-710.
[503] Chaâbani W, Proust J, Ouellet S, Movseyan A, Béal J, Bachelot R, Xu T, Baudron A-L, Adam P-M, Boudreau D, Chehaidar A, Plain J. Si@Au core-shell nanostructures: Toward a new platform for controlling optical properties at the nanoscale. J Phys Chem C 2021;125:20606–16.

[504] Li L, Rosenkranz S, Schäfer W, Tropea C. Light scattering from a drop with an embedded particle and its exploitation in the time-shift technique. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;227:20–31.

[505] Li L, Stegmann PG, Rosenkranz S, Schäfer W, Tropea C. Simulation of light scattering from a colloidal droplet using a polarized Monte-Carlo method: application to the time-shift technique. Opt Express 2019;27(25):36388–404.

[506] Li L, Tropea C. Measurement of the colloidal particle concentration and size within a drop using the time-shift technique. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;263:107548.

[507] Schaeffer W, Tropea C, Wigger G, Eierhoff D. Spray measurements with the time-shift technique. Meas Sci Technol 2021;32(10):105202.

[508] Weill ME, Lhuissier N, Gouesbet G. Mean diameters and number densities in premixed flat flames CH₄-O₂ by means of Diffusion Broadening Spectroscopy. Appl Opt 1986;25(10):1676–83.

[509] Derkachov G, Jakubczyk D, Kolwas K, Shopa Y, Wozniak M. Dynamic light scattering investigation of single levitated micrometre-sized droplets containing spherical nanoparticles. Measurement 2020;158:107681.

[510] Xiong Y, Zhang X, Hu L. A method for tracking the Brownian motion to estimate the size distribution of submicroparticles in seawater. Limnol Oceanograph: Methods 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/limo.310494.

[511] Maheu B, Toulouzan JN Le, Gouesbet G. Four-flux model to solve the scattering transfer equation in terms of Lorenz-Mie parameters. Appl Opt 1984;23:19353–62.

[512] Maheu B, Gouesbet G. Four-flux models to solve the scattering transfer equation. Special cases. Appl Opt 1986;25,7:1122–8.

[513] Maheu B, Briton JP, Gouesbet G. Four-flux model and a Monte-Carlo code: Comparisons between two simple and complementary tools for multiple scattering calculations. Appl Opt 1989;28,1:22–4.

[514] Roze C, Girasole T, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Maheu B. Average crossing parameter and forward scattering ratio values in four-flux model for multiple scattering media. Opt Commun 2001;194(4–6):251–63.

[515] Roze C, Girasole T, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Maheu B. Corrigendum to average crossing parameter and forward scattering ratio values in four-flux model for multiple scattering media. Opt Commun 2002;203(445).

[516] Briton JP, Maheu B, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Monte-Carlo simulation of multiple scattering in arbitrary 3D-geometry. Part Part Syst Charact 1992;9:52–8.

[517] Vargas WE, Wang J, Niklasson GA. Scattering and absorption cross sections of light diffusing materials retrieved from reflectance and transmittance spectra of collimated radiation. J Mod Opt 2020;67(11):974–91.

[518] Duvellier V, Gevaux L, Clerc R, Salomon J-P, Hebert M. Reflectance and transmittance of flowable dental resin composite predicted by the two-flux model: On the importance of analyzing the effective measurement geometry. In: 28th color and imaging conference final program and proceedings. 2020.

[519] Duveiller V, Kim E, Locquet M, Gautheron A, Clerc R, Salomon J-P, Hébert M. Predictions of the reflectance factor of translucent layered dental resin composites using two-flux models: Assessing the importance of the interface reflectance parameter. In: The 11th colour and visual computing symposium, September 8-9, Gjovik, Norway, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2022.

[520] Rio S, Andraud C, Deniard P, Dacquin C, Delaval R, Donze S, Jobic S. Study of the influence of crystalline phases on optical characteristics of a glass-ceramic in the visible range via simulations by the four-flux model. J Non-Crystall Solids 2021;551:120446.

[521] Yang Z, Huang M, Yang R, Sun J, Zhang X, Pan W, Wan C. Near-infrared trapping by surface plasmons in randomized platinum-ceramic metamaterial for thermal barrier coatings. Small Methods 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smd.202201691.

[522] Vargas WE, Jimenez DM, Montero ML. Model to subtract contributions of scattered radiation from measured direct transmittance and specular reflectance by light diffusing materials. Appl Opt 2022;61(34):10197–205.

[523] Haratoka C, Yalcin RA, Erturk H. Design of thermo-chromic glazing windows considering energy consumption and visual comfort for cellular offices. Sol Energy 2022;241:637–49.

[524] Mishra BR, Varghese NJ, Sasihithlu K. Semi-analytical technique for the design of disordered coatings with tailored optical properties. 2023, arXiv:2301.00382v1 [physics.optics].

[525] Zhu S, Xiao H, Wang M, Jin G. The potential of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy as a tool for characterizing the particle size of dispersion phase in polymer blends. Polymer 2023;283:126289.

[526] Barrios D, Alvarez C. Spectral voltage contour plots of optical constants and interface parameters of the active layer of a multilayer structure suspended particle device smart window from clear to on dark off states. Electron J Chem 2023;25(1):8–20.

[527] Rebolledo-Oyarce J, Mejia-Lopez J, Garcia G, Rodriguez-Cordova L, Saez-Navarrete C. Novel photobioreactor design for the culture of Dunaliella tertiolecta - impact of color in the growth of microalgae. Bioresour Technol 2019;289:121645.

[528] Ribeiro E, Plantard G, Cornet J-F, Gros F, Caliot C, Goetz V. Experimental and theoretical coupled approaches for the analysis of radiative transfer in photoreactors containing particulate media: Case study of TiO2 powders for photocatalytic reactions. Chem Eng Sci 2021;243:116733.

[529] Diao ZD, Jing Q, Zhong W. Comparison of the influence of Martian and Earth's atmospheric environments on terahertz band electromagnetic waves. Int J Commun Syst 2021;34(12):e4894.

[530] Membre A-C, Fadanelli FZ, Tournié A, Michelin A, Richard N, Andraud C. Spectral variability of the optical properties of pictorial layers. Appl Phys A 2021;127(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-04196-9.

[531] Huang M, Liang J, Zhang P, Li Y, Han Y, Yang Z, Pan W, Wan C. Opaque Gd2Zr2O7GdMnO3 thermal barrier materials for thermal radiation shielding: the effect of polaron excitation. J Mater Sci Technol 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.013.

[532] Yu H, Lee H, Cheong J, Woo SW, Oh J, Oh H-K, Lee J-H, Zheng H, Castro CM, Yoo Y-E, Kim M-G, Cheon J, Weissleder R, Lee H. A rapid assay provides on-site quantification of tetrahydro-cannabinol in oral fluid. Sci Transl Med 2021;13(616):2352.

[533] Wang J, Niklasson A. Extraction of light absorption and scattering coefficients of gold nanocomposites. In: Bremen Zoom Workshop on Light Scattering. 2021.

[534] Niklasson GA, Wang J, Notfors C, Niklasson SL, Stromme M, Arhammar C. Light scattering parameters by inversion of experimental data: The case of sunscreen lotions. In: Workshop on light scattering, Bremen. 2021.

[535] Eymard J, Clerc R, Duveiller V, Commault B, Hebert M. Characterization of UV-Vis-NIR optical constants of encapsulant for accurate determination of absorption and backscattering losses in photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2022;240:111717.

[536] Aziz HS, Huang M, Li Z, Wan C, Pan W. Repressing high-temperature radiative transfer in thermal barrier coatings. J Am Ceram Soc 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jace.18321.

[537] Gautheron A, Clerc R, Duveiller V, Simonot L, Montcel B, Hebert M. Light scattering in translucent layers: Angular distribution and internal reflections at flat interfaces. 2022, Electronic Imaging2022 (EI2022), San Francisco, hal-03533893.

[538] Wang Y, Hsu P-F, Wu Y. Thermal radiative properties of zirconium oxide films in the near-infrared wavelengths. Appl Ceram Technol 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijac.14047.

[539] Barrios D, Alvarez C, Miguitama J, Wang J, Niklasson GA. Light scattering parameters of polymer dispersed liquid crystals obtained by inversion of experimental data. Bremen 2022, Polymer dispersed liquid crystals.

[540] Duveiller V, Clerc R, Eymard J, Salomon J-P, Hébert M. Performance of two-flux and four-flux models for predicting the spectral reflectance and transmittance factors of flowable dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.06.010.

[541] Huang Z, Long L, Ye H, Liu M. A modified kubelka-munk four-flux model for UV-vis-nir spectral reflectance of a particle-inclusion film. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Radiative Transfer, RAD-23, Thessalonikoi, Greece. 2023.

[542] Jönsson J, Berrocal E. Multi-scattering software: Part I: Online accelerated Monte-Carlo simulation of light transport through scattering media. Opt Express 2020;28(25):37612–38.

[543] Zeng X, Liang C, Duan L, Chen X, Liu D, Ma J. Thermal radiation characteristics in dilute phase region of the oxy-fuel combustion pressurized fluidized bed. Appl Therm Eng 2020;179:115659.

[544] Wang S, Chen T, Yu B, Sun Y, Qin X. Coupling impacts of spray and rainfall on road visibility and vehicle speeds: A simulation-based analysis. Can J Civil Eng 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2021-0402.

[545] Mishchenko M, Dlugach Z. Multiple scattering of polarized light by particles in an absorbing medium. Appl Opt 2019;58(18):4871–7.

[546] Mishchenko MI, Yurkin MA. Co- and counter-propagating wave effects in an absorbing medium. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;242:106688.

[547] Cao Z, Liang C, Zhou X, Zeng X, Duan L, Chen X, Liu D. Radiative heat transfer in splash and dilution zones of the pressurized oxy-fuel combustion CFB considering particle-dependent scattering. Adv Powder Technol 2022;33:103697.

[548] Zambrana-Puyalto X, Angelis F De, D'Ambrosio V. Vortex circular dichroism: An experimental technique to assess the scalar/vectorial regime of diffraction. Open Res Eur 2022.

[549] Zhang Hao, Nie W, Liang Y, Chen J, Peng H. Development and performance detection of higher precision optical sensor for coal dust concentration measurement based on mie scattering theory. Opt Lasers Eng 2021;144:106642.

[550] Hou K, Wang C, Liu X. Study on backward scattering characteristics of submicron particles. Opt Photon J 2020;10:79–87.

[551] Stone L, Zigan S, Waduge LL Lulbadda, Hastie DB. A modelling and validation approach for predicting particle concentrations of airborne dust during the filling process of cylindrical silos. Appl Sci 2021;11:11041794.

[552] Moteki N. Measuring the complex forward-scattering amplitude of single particles by self-reference interferometry: CAS-v1 protocol. Opt Express 2021;29(13):20688–714.
[553] Semenov V, Suvorina A, Dolgoborodov A, Mamykin G, Chernakov D, Shelestov D, Lychagov V. Open-air miniature fine dust sensor. IEEE Sens J 2022;22(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3147372.

[554] Cinar G, Solomun JI, Mapfumo P, Traeger A, Nischang I. Nanoparticle sizing in the field of nanomedicine: Power of an analytical ultracentrifuge. Analyt Chim Acta 2022;1205:339741.

[555] Odelli D, Sarigiannidou K, Soliani A, Marie R, Mohammadifar MA, Jessen F, Spigno G, Vall-Ilosera M, de Carvalho A Fernandes, Verni M, Casanova F. Interaction between fish skin gelatin and pea protein at air-water interface after ultrasound treatment. Foods 2022;11:659. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11050659.

[556] Zanini L, Sada C. Droplet-induced optical effects in an opto-microfluidic cross-configuration system. Phys Fluids 2023;35:032007.

[557] Liu G, Wollny P, Menser J, Dreir T, Endres T, Wlokas I, Daun KJ, Schultz C. Spatially resolved measurement of the distribution of solid and liquid si nanoparticles in plasma synthesis through line-of-sight extinction spectroscopy. Opt Express 2023;31(3):4978-5001.

[558] Lasa-Alonso J, Gomez-Viloria I, Nodar A, Etxarri A Garcia, Molina-Terriza G, Olmos-Trigo J. Characterizing cylindrical particles upon local measurements of two Stokes parameters. 2023, arXiv:2304.02762v1 [physics.optics].

[559] Yao W, Pan X, Tian Y, Liu H, Zhang Y, Lei S, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wu L, Sun Y, Wang Z. Development and evaluation of online monitoring single-particle optical particle counter with polarization detection. J Environ Sci 2024;138:558-96.

[560] Cao Z, Cui F, Xian F, Zhai C, Pei S. A hybrid approach using machine learning and genetic algorithm to inverse modeling for single sphere scattering in a Gaussian light sheet. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;235:180-6.

[561] Altman LE, Grier DG. CATCH: Characterizing and tracking colloids holographically with deep neural networks. J Phys Chem B 2020;124:1602-10.

[562] Altman LE, Grier DG. Machine learning enables precise holographic characterization of colloidal materials in real time. Soft Matter 2023;16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D25MO1283A.

[563] Stumpf B, Ruesch JH, Roisman IV, Tropea C, Hussong J. An imaging technique for determining the volume fraction of two-component droplets of immiscible fluids. Exp Fluids 2022;63(114). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-034462-1.

[564] Tang H, Zhu Z, Li R, Zhuang W. Electromagnetic inverse scattering of a charged spherical particle based on neural network. In: Proceedings of SPIE, 12565, conference on infrared, millimeter, terahertz waves and applications (IMT2022), 125652Q. 12 April 2023.

[565] Zhao X, Lin H, Chen H, Zheng H, Ng J. Back-propagation-assisted inverse design of structured light fields for given profiles of optical force. Nanophotonics 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0101.

[566] Liu L, Islam MZ, Liu X, Gupta M, Rozmuz W, Mandal M, Tsui YY. Multi-wavelength multi-direction laser light scattering for cell characterization using machine-learning based methods. Cytometry, Part A 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24771.

[567] Taei A, Karimzadeh R, Jahanbakhshian M. Combining machine learning and mie theory to simplify particle characterization inside microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 2023;123:124101.

[568] Cioffi G, Dannhauser D, Rossi D, Netti PA, Gausa F. Unknown cell class distinction via neural network based scattering snapshot recognition. Biomed Opt Express 2023;14(10):5060-74.

[569] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. On the electromagnetic scattering of arbitrary shaped beams by arbitrary shaped particles : A review. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;162:31-49.

[570] Gouesbet G, Lock JA. On the description of electromagnetic arbitrary shaped beams. The relationship between beam shape coefficients and plane wave spectra. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2015;162:18-30.

[571] Vennes B, Rafferty A, Preston TC. Cavity-enhanced Raman scattering from optically deformed droplets. J Opt Soc Am B 2021;38(3):893-906.

[572] Liu L, Mishchenko MI. Spectrally dependent linear depolarization and lidar ratios for nonspherical smoke aerosols. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;248:106953.

[573] Han KTM, Kazunori K, Siritanawan P, Kongprawechnon W. Analysis of power transmission through IOL with glistenings and whitenings by T-matrix. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;253:107083.

[574] Vavilin M, Fernandez-Corbaton I. The polychromatic T-matrix. 2023, arXiv: 2306.07776v [physics.optics].

[575] Saito M, Yang P. Quantifying the impact of the surface roughness of hexagonal ice crystals on backscattering properties for lidar-based remote sensing applications. Geophys Res Lett 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023GL.104175.

[576] Sun B, Gao C, Liang D, Spurr R. Analytical linearization of light scattering properties of a single particle based on the invariant-embedding T-matrix and pjysical-geometric optics method. In: Springer Series in Light Scattering, vol. 9, 2023, p. 107-63.

[577] Ungut A, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G. Comparisons between geometrical optics and Lorenz-Mie theory for transparent particles in forward directions. Appl Opt 1981;20,17:2911-8.

[578] Yu H, Shen J, Tropea C, Xu F. Model for computing optical caustic partitions for the primary rainbow from tilted spheroids. Opt Lett 2019;44(4):823-6.

[579] Bin Z, Yu Z, Yunxi L, Qingyan L, Yuru B, Shiyu Y, Tiankai C, Chunhui W. The characteristics of laser scattered by droplets. Internat J Modern Phys B 2019;33(21):1950236.

[580] Duan Q, Han X, Idlahcen S, Ren KF. Three-dimensional light scattering by a real liquid jet; VCRM simulation and experimental validation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;239:106677.

[581] Duan Q, Han X'e, Ren KF. Light scattering by an infinite cylinder of arbitrarily smooth cross section based on vectorial complex ray model. Opt Commun 2020;467:125705.

[582] Bredikhin VI, Kazakov VV. The excitation of ultrasound by laser radiation in water using an optical fiber laser converter with a 2D colloidal crystalline coating. Coatings 2019;9(857):1-9.

[583] Bredikhin VI. Gaussian beam sphere optics in condensed matter research. Opt Commun 2020;455:124476.

[584] Lock JA. Imaging through a homogeneous circular cylinder: The role of virtual caustics, rainbow glare points, and image fragmentation. Appl Opt 2020;59(21):F53-62.

[585] Guo J, Hu B, Chen Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Yan L-Q. Rendering discrete participating media using geometrical optics approximation. Comput Vis Media 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41095-021-0253-5.

[586] Wang J, Yu H, Shen J, Yang B, Tropea C. Simulation of the optical caustics associated with the primary rainbow for oblate spheroidal drops illuminated by a Gaussian beam. Opt Express 2021;29(1):377-84.

[587] Lee T-X, Li Y-M, Shen J-Y, Tsuei C-H. Dynamic spectral compensation of white LEDs in underwater illumination. Opt Eng 2021;60(9):091506.

[588] Malik KS, Boruah BR. Optical force calculation in the ray-optics regime for beams with arbitrary complex amplitude profiles. Opt Lett 2022;47(16):4151-4.

[589] Duan Q, Onofri FRA, Han X, Ren KF. Numerical implementation of three-dimensional vectorial complex ray model and application to rainbow scattering of spheroidal drops. Opt Express 2023;31(21):34980-5002.

[590] Zhang X, Yang Y, Zhang J, Li R. Scattering of an airy light-sheet by a non-spherical particle using discrete dipole approximation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2019;225:84-90.

[591] Raschpichler C, Goroncy C, Langer B, Antonsson E, Wassermann B, Graf C, Klack P, Lischke T, Rühl E. Surface properties and porosity of silica particles studied by wide-angle soft X-ray scattering. J Phys Chem 2020;124:16663-74.

[592] Glukhova SA, Yurkin MA. Implementation of scattering of generalized Bessel beams in the framework of the discrete dipole approximation. In: Bremen Workshop on Light Scattering, 2021, p. 43-4.

[593] Glukhova SA, Yurkin MA. Scattering of generalized Bessel beams simulated with the discrete dipole approximation. In: VIth International Conference on Metamaterials and Nanophotonics. 2021.

[594] Hui Y, Cui Z, Han Y. Implementation of typical structured light beams in discrete dipole approximation for scattering problems. J Opt Soc Amer A 2022;39(9):1739-48.

[595] Mai L, Yang S, Wang Y, Li R. Impacts of shape assumptions on Z-R relationship and satellite remote sensing clouds based on model simulations and GPM observations. Remote Sens 2023;15:1556.

[596] Arnoldus HF. Energy flow in light scattering by a small conducting sphere. J Appl Phys 2023;133:114304.

[597] Kocifaj M, Komar L, Lamphar H, Barentine J, Wallner S. A systematic light pollution modelling bias in present sky brightness predictions. Nat Astron 2023;7:269-79.

[598] Gouesbet G. Debye series formulation for generalized Lorenz-Mie theory with the bromwich method. Part Part Syst Charact 2003;20;6:382-6.

[599] Zhuang W, Li R, Liang J, Jia Y. Debye series expansion for light scattering by a charged sphere. Appl Opt 2021;60(7):1903-15.

[600] Liu Z. Scattering by large bubbles: Correction for Debye coefficients at a small number of sub-waves. Opt Photon J 2022;12:53-63.

[601] Bi L, Xu F, Gouesbet G. Depolarization of nearly spherical particles: The Debye series. Phys Rev A 2018;98(5):053809.

[602] Bi L, Gouesbet G. Debye series expansion of T-matrix for light scattering by non-spherical particles computed from riccati differential equations. Opt Express 2022;30(16):29796-810.

[603] Wang T, Tang B. Efficient prediction and analysis of optical trapping at nanoscale via finite element tearing and interconnecting method. Nanoscale Res Lett 2019;14(294).

[604] Golharani S, Heidari-Semiromi E, Jazi B, Rahmani Z. Plasma-covered long cylindrical non-isotropic dielectric lenses for targeted control of energy distribution. Eur Phys J Plus 2021;135:766.

[605] Golharani S, Jazi B, Heidari-Semiromi E, Rahmani Z. The cylindrical column lenses and reflectors made of transverse anisotropic plasma and dielectrics and their response to presence of plane electromagnetic waves. Optik 2021;241:167257.

[606] Sahoo S, Das GM, Dantham VR. Experimental and numerical investigation on plasmonic properties of single-sprouted potato-shaped Au-Ag bimetallic nanoparticles. Plasmonics 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-01931-9.
[607] Lian J, Zhang D, Hong R, Yan T, Lv T, Zhang D. Broadband absorption tailoring of SiO2/Cu/ITO arrays based on hybrid coupled resonance mode. Nanomaterials 2019;9(852).

[608] Wu Z, Wang J, Briard P, Han Y, Chen A, Zhao W, Jiao Y. Generation of an arbitrary order Bessel beam in FDTD for time domain calculation. In: 14th National Conference on Laser Technology and Optoelectronics (LTO2019), 111701M. Proc SPIE 2019;11170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2533457.

[609] Ding X, Shao C, Yu S, Yu B, Li Z, Tan Y. Study of the optical properties of multi-particle phosphors by the FDTD and ray tracing combined method. Photonics 2020;7:7040126.

[610] Savelyev DA. The features of the optical traps formation using silicon ring gratings with variable height. Photonics 2023;10:1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/photonics10111264.

[611] Wang B, Xu Y, Wu Z, Zhang Z, Wang Q. All-dielectric metasurface-based color filter in CMOS image sensor. Opt Commun 2023;540:129485.

[612] Liu G, Yan C, Sui X, Kuang D. A single MoSe₂ fluffy nanosphere for localized light confinement. Appl Nano Mater 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnnm.3c02037.

[613] Chen Z, Zhang H, Huang Z, Wu X. Shaped beam scattering by an object with a uniaxial anisotropic inclusion. Opt Laser Technol 2019;109:84–9.

[614] Li S, Shi J, Zhang X, Zhang G. Axial acoustic radiation force on a spherical particle in a zero-order mathieu beam. J Acoust Soc Am 2019;145(5):3233–41.

[615] Wu M, Li C, Fan X, Liao C, He Z. Large-scale multiplexed weak reflector array fabricated with a femtosecond laser for a fiber-optic quasi-distributed acoustic sensing system. Opt Lett 2020;45(13):3685–8.

[616] Pessôa MAS, Neves AAR. Acoustic scattering and forces on an arbitrarily sized fluid sphere by a general acoustic field. J Sound Vib 2020;479:115373.

[617] Schweitzer J-M, Servel M, Salvatori F, Dandeu A, Minière M, Joly J-F, Gaubert Q, Barbosa S, Onofri FRA. Spary drying of colloidal suspensions: Coupling of particle drying and transport models with experimental validations. Chem Eng Res Des 2021;170:224–38.

[618] Rondon I. Acoustic spin and orbital angular momentum using evanescent Bessel beams. J Phys Commun 2021;5:085015.

[619] Wang N, Zhang R-H, Chan CT. Robust acoustic pulling using chiral surface waves. Phys Rev A 2021;15(2):024034.

[620] Ospina JF, Contreras V, Estrada-Morales J, Baresch D, Ealo JL, Volke-Sepulveda K. Particle-size effect in airborne standing-wave acoustic levitation: Trapping particles at pressure antinodes. Phys Rev Appl 2022;18:034026.

[621] Farhat M, Guenneau S, Chen P-Y, Wu Y. Scattering properties of acoustic beams off spinning objects: Induced radiation force and torque. Appl Phys Lett 2022;121:141702.

[622] Martin P. On acoustic scattering of beams. Wave motion 2022;115:103075.

[623] Pessôa MAS, Neves AAR. 3-D acoustic trapping with standing waves. 2022, arXiv:2204.08093v1 [physics.class-ph].

[624] Li S, Shi J, Zhang X. Study on acoustic radiation force of an elastic sphere in an off-axis Gaussian beam using localized approximation. J Acoust Soc Am 2022;151:2602–12.

[625] Li S, Zhang X. Three-dimensional acoustic radiation force of a eukaryotic cell arbitrarily positioned in a Gaussian beam. Nanotechnol Precis Eng 2023;6:013005.

[626] Li S, Zhang X. Study on acoustic radiation force of a rigid sphere arbitrarily positioned in a zero-order Mathieu beam. J Acoust Soc Am 2023;153:2460–8.

[627] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. The finite series method in acoustic scattering with application to Bessel beams. In Proceedings of forumacusticum 2023 (10th convention of the European acoustics association) Turin, Italy, 11th-15th September 2023.

[628] Ambrosio LA, Gouesbet G. Finite series approach for the calculation of beam shape coefficients in ultrasonic and other acoustic scattering. J Sound Vib 2024.

[629] LA Ambrosio, G Gouesbet. A localized approximation approach for the calculation of beam shape coefficients of acoustic and ultrasonic Bessel beams. Acta Acust 2024. submitted for publication.

[630] Gouesbet G, Ambrosio LA. Rigorous justification of a localized approximation to encode on-axis Gaussian acoustical waves. J Acoust Soc Am 2023;154(2):1062–72.

[631] G Gouesbet, LA Ambrosio. Description of acoustical Gaussian beams from the electromagnetic davis scheme of approximations and the on-axis localized approximation. J Acoust Soc Amer 2024;155:1583–92.

[632] Gouesbet G, Shen J, Ambrosio LA. Diverging and converging schemes of approximations to describe fundamental EM Gaussian beams beyond the paraxial approximation. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2022;291:108344.

[633] G Gouesbet, LA Ambrosio. Rigorous justification of a localized approximation to encode off-axis Gaussian acoustical beams. J Acoust Soc Amer 2024. submitted for publication.

[634] Gouesbet G. Validity of the cylindrical localized approximation for arbitrary shaped beams in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for circular cylinders. J Modern Opt 1999;46(8):1185–200.

[635] Gouesbet G, Méès L. Validity of the elliptical cylinder localized approximation for arbitrary shaped beams in generalized Lorenz-Mie theory for elliptical cylinders. J Opt Soc Amer A 1999;16:12946–58.

[636] Gouesbet G. On the optical theorem and non-plane-wave scattering in quantum mechanics. J Math Phys 2009;50:112302.

[637] Andrews DL, Bradshaw DS, Forbes KA, Salam A. Quantum electrodynamics in modern optics and photonics: Tutorial. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2020;37(4):1153–72.

[638] Wang Y, Zou S, Mao Y, Guo Y. Improving underwater continuous-variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution via zero-photon catalysis. Entropy 2020;22(571). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e22050571.

[639] Tareeva M, Shevchenko M, Umanskaya S, Savichev V, Baranov A, Tchemiega N, Kudryavtseva A. Two-photon excited luminescence in polyethylene and polytetrafluoroethylene. J Russ Laser Res 2020;41(5):502–8.

[640] Davydov AP, Zlydneva TP. On simulation of the photon wave function to explain the Young's experiment and prospects for its use in quantum cryptography. J Phys Conf Ser 2020;1661:012028.

[641] Zhang S-J, Xiao C, Zhou C, Wang X, Yao J-S, Zhang H-L, Bao W-S. Performance analysis of the continuous-variable measurement device-independent quantum key distribution under diverse weather conditions. Chin Phys B 2020;29(2):020301.

[642] Angelsky OV, Bekshaev AY, Mokhun II, Vasnetsov MV, Zenkova CY, Hanson SG, Zheng J. Review on the structured light properties: Rotational features and singularities. Opto-electron Rev 2022;30:e140860.

[643] Wang G-Z, Webb JF. New method to get fundamental Gaussian beam's perturbation solution and its global property. Appl Phys B 2008;93:345–8.

[644] Ren KF, Shen J. Volume 7: Light absorption and scattering in turbid media. In: Kokhanovsky A, editor. Springer; 2021, p. 125–58.

[645] Bunea A-I, Glückstad J. Strategies for optical trapping in biological samples: Aiming at microrobotic surgeons. Laser Photon Rev 2019;Paper 1800227.

[646] Polimen P, Saija R, Boschi CDE, Marago OM, Iati MA. Optical forces in the T-matrix formalism. Atti della Acad Pelorit dei Pericolani 2019;97(1):A2.

[647] Neves AAR, Cesar CL. Analytical calculation of optical forces on spherical particles in optical tweezers: Tutorial. J Opt Soc Amer B Opt Phys 2019;36(6):1525–37.

[648] Li N, Zhu X-M, Li W-Q, Fu Z-H, Hu M-Z, Hu H-Z. Review of optical tweezers in vacuum. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng 2019;20(5):655–73.

[649] Favre-Bulle IA, Stilgoe AB, Scott EK, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H. Optical trapping in vivo: Theory, practice, and applications. Nanophotonics 2019;8(6):1023–40.

[650] Andrew P-K, Williams MAK, Avci E. Optical micromachines for biological studies. Micromachines 2020;11(192). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mil1020192.

[651] Avsievich T, Zhu R, Popov A, Bykov A, Meglinski I. The advancement of blood cell research by optical tweezers. Rev Phys 2020;5:100043.

[652] Min C, Yuan Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Yuan X. The hand of light for micro/nano-particle manipulation: Research progress of optical tweezers (in Chinese). J Shenzhen Univ Sci Eng 2020;37(5):441–58.

[653] Yang Y, Ren Y-X, Chen M, Arita Y, Rosales-Guzman C. Optical trapping with structured light: A review. Adv Photon 2021;3(3):034001.

[654] Pesce G, Jones PH, Marago OM, Volpe G. Optical tweezers: Theory and practice. Eur Phys J Plus 2020;135:949.

[655] Wang C, Pan Y-L, Videen G. Optical trapping and laser-spectroscopy measurements of single particles in air: A review. Meas Sci Technol 2021;32:102005.

[656] Kalume A, Wang C, Pan Y-L. Optical-trapping laser techniques for characterizing airborne aerosol particles and its application in chemical aerosol study. Micromachines (Basel) 2021;12(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mil12040466.

[657] Li M, Yan S, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Yao B. Orbital angular momentum in optical manipulations. J Opt 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac9192.

[658] Tsuji T, Doi K, Kawano S. Optical trapping in micro- and nanoconfinement systems: Role of thermo-fluid dynamics and applications. J Photochem Photobiol, C: Photochem Rev 2022;52:100533.

[659] Shen Z, Huang X. A review of optical tweezers with metasurfaces. Photonics 2023;10(623).

[660] Winstone G, Bhattacharya M, Geraci AA, Li T, Pauzauskie PJ, Vamivakas N. Levitated optomechanics: A tutorial and perspective. 2023, arXiv:2307.11858v1 [quant-ph], 21 Jul 2023.

[661] Cai L, Pan, Hu S. Overview of the coupling methods used in whispering gallery mode resonator system for sensing. Opt Lasers Eng 2020;127:105968.

[662] Cai L, Pan J, Zhao Y, Wang J, Xiao S. Whispering gallery mode optical microresonators: Structures and sensing applications. Phys Status Solidi A 2020;1900825.

[663] Zhang Y, An W, Zhao C, Dong Q. Radiation induced plasmonic nanobubbles: Fundamentals, applications and prospects. AIMS Energy 2021;9(4):676–713.

[664] Gouesbet G, Rozé C, Meunier-Guttin-Cluzel S. Instabilities by local heating below an interface, a review. J Nonequilib Thermodynam 2000;25:337–79.

[665] Li H, Song W, Zhao Y, Cao Q, Wen A. Optical trapping, sensing, and imaging by photonic nanojets. Photonics 2021;8:434.

[666] Surdo S, Duocastella M, Diaspro A. Nanopatterning with photonic nanojets: Review and perspectives in biomedical research. Micromachines 2021;12(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mil12030256.

[667] Minh DP, Acart P, Boachon C, Calvet R, Chesnaud A, Confetto S Del, Dirion J-L, Dong J, Ephraim A, Haurie L, Lyczko N, Munirathinam R, Nzihou A, Patry S, Rolland C, Millan LMR, Roques L, Sane AR, Sani R, Weiss-Hortala E, White CE. Handbook on characterization of biomass, biowaste and related-by-products. Springer; 2020, p. 31–497.
[668] Romanov AV, Yurkin MA. Single-particle characterization by elastic light scattering. Laser Photon Rev 2021;15:2000368.

[669] Swirniak G, Mrockza J. Forward and inverse analysis for particle size distribution measurement of disperse samples: A review. Measurement 2022;187:110256.

[670] Martin C, Altman LE, Rawat S, Wang A, Grier DG, Manoharan VN. In-line holographic microscopy with model-based analysis. Nature Reviews | Methods Primers 2022;2(83):1–17, Article citation ID: (2022).

[671] Ranasinghesagara JC, Potma EO, Venugopalan V. Modeling nonlinear optical microscopy in scattering media, Part I. Propagation from lens to focal volume: Tutorial. J Opt Soc Amer A 2023;40(5):867–82.

[672] Mulla J, Kaka F, Satpathy RK. The emergence of reflective thermal barrier coatings. Crit Rev Solid State and Mater Science 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2023.2245599.

[673] Baudoin M, Thomas J-L. Acoustical tweezers for particles and fluids micromanipulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2019;52(1):1–30.

[674] Sun B, Bi L, Yang P, Kahnert M, Kattawar G. Invariant imbedding T-matrix method for light scattering by nonspherical and inhomogeneous particles. Elsevier; 2019.

[675] Cook J, Flanner M, Williamson C, Skiles S McKenzie. Springer series in light scattering. 2019, p. 129–63.

[676] Wang T, Gao T, Zhang H, Ge M, Lei H, Zhang P, Zhang P, Lu C, Liu C, Zhang H, Zhang Q, Liao H, Kan H, Feng Z, Zhang Y, Qie X, Cai X, Li M, Liu L, Tong S. Review of Chinese atmospheric science reasearch over the past 70 years: Atmospheric physics and atmospheric environment. Sci China, Earth Sci 2019;62(12):1903–45.

[677] Frisvad JR, Kragh H. On Ludvig Lorenz and his 1890 treatise on light scattering by spheres. Eur Phys J H 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2019-100022-y.

[678] Logan NA. Survey of some early studies of the scattering of plane waves by a sphere; reprinted in selected papers on light scattering, part one, SPIE, vol 951, 3-15, 1988, m. Kerker (ed.). Proc IEEE 1965;53:877–85.

[679] Kragh H. Ludvig V. Lorenz: his contributions to optical theory and light scattering by spheres. In: Hirleman D, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Optical Particle Sizing. Arizona State University. 1990, p. 1–6.

[680] Kragh H. Ludvig Lorenz and the nineteenth century optical theory. The work of a great Danish scientist. Appl Opt 1991;30(33):4688–95.

[681] Logan NA. Survey of some early studies of the scattering of plane waves by a sphere. In: hirleman D, editor. Proceedings of the second international symposium on optical particle sizing. Arizona state university; 1990, p. 7–15.

[682] Mishchenko MI. Comprehensive thematic T-matrix reference database: A 2017–2019 update. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2020;242:106692.

[683] Tribelsky MI, Miroshnichenko AE. Resonant scattering of electromagnetic waves by small metal particles (in Russian). 2020, arXiv:2009.08538.

[684] Boel E, Koekoekx R, Dedroog S, Babkin I, Vetrano MR, Clasen C, den Mooter G Van. Unraveling particle formation: From single droplet drying to spray drying and electrospraying. Pharmaceutics 2020;12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12070625.

[685] Darafsheh A. Photonic jets and their applications. J Phys: Photon 2021;3:022001.

[686] Minin OV, Minin IV. Optical phenomena in mesoscale dielectric particles. Photonics 2021;8(12). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120591.

[687] Moud AA. Recent advances in utility of artificial intelligence towards multiscale colloidal based materials design. Colloid Interf Sci Commun 2022;47:100595.

[688] Moud AA. Recent advances in utility of artificial intelligence towards multiscale colloidal based materials design. Colloid Interf Sci Commun 2022;47:100595.

[689] Fuqiang W, Xinping Z, Yan D, Hongliang Y, Shi X, Yang L, Ziming C. Progress in radiative transfer in porous medium: A review from macroscale to pore scale with experimental test. Appl Therm Eng 2022;210:1183321.

[690] Sedeh HB, Litchinitser NM. Singular optics empowered by engineered optical materials. Nanophotonics 2023;12(14):2687–716.

[691] Eghtesad A, Bijarchi MA, Shafii MB, Afshin H. A state-of-the-art review on laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) method with application in temperature measurement. Int J Therm Sci 2024;196:108686.

[692] Yao K, Zheng Y. Nanophotonics and machine learning. In: Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol. 241, Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2023, p. 1–33.

[693] Olmos-Trigo J, Melendez M, Delgado-Buscalioni R, Saenz JJ. Sectorial multipole focused beams. Opt Express 2019;27(11):16384–94.

[694] Chen W, Yang Q, Chen Y, Liu W. Global mie scattering: Polarization morphologies and the underlying topological invariant. ACS Omega 2020;5:14157–63.

[695] Parker JA, Sugimoto H, Coe B, Eggena D, Fujii M, Scherer NF, Gray SK, Manna U. Excitation of nonradiating anapoles in dielectric nanospheres. Phys Rev Lett 2020;124:097402.

[696] Yang Q, Chen W, Chen Y, Liu W. Symmetry protected invariant scattering properties of incident plane waves of arbitrary polarizations. Laser Photon Rev 2021;15:2000496.

[697] Gouesbet G, Votto LFM, Ambrosio LA, Wang J. Poynting vector and beam shape coefficients: On new families of symmetries (non-dark axisymmetric beams of the second kind and dark axisymmetric beams). J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2021;271:107745.

[698] Olmos-Trigo J. The Stokes vector measurement: A paradigm shift in electric-magnetic light distinction. 2023, arXiv:2310.17946vl [physics.optics] 27 Oct 2023.

[699] Wei H, Du Q, Shi C, Xue X, Cai D. Crosstalk characteristics of orbital angular momentum of focused perfect vortex beam in atmospheric turbulence. Laser Phys 2023;33:115402.

[700] Su D, Jin N-X, Yang Y, Zhang T. Micro- and nano-scale optical focusing for carrier management in silicon solar cell. Sol Energy 2023;264:112026.

[701] Radowski P, Ziolkowski P, Mikielewicz D. Energy conversion in systems-contained laser-irradiated metallic nanoparticles - comparisons of results from analytical solutions and numerical methods. Sciendo 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ama-2023-0063.

[702] Ambrosio LA, de Sarro JO, Gouesbet G. An approach for a polychromatic generalized Lorenz-Mie theory. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2024;312:108824.