# Mechanistic Insight into Bunyavirus-Induced Membrane Fusion from Structure-Function Analyses of the Hantavirus Envelope Glycoprotein Gc

Pablo Guardado-Calvo, Eduardo A. Bignon, Eva Stettner, Scott Allen Jeffers, Jimena Pérez-Vargas, Gerard Pehau-Arnaudet, M. Alejandra Tortorici, Jean-Luc Jestin, Patrick England, Nicole D. Tischler, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Pablo Guardado-Calvo, Eduardo A. Bignon, Eva Stettner, Scott Allen Jeffers, Jimena Pérez-Vargas, et al.. Mechanistic Insight into Bunyavirus-Induced Membrane Fusion from Structure-Function Analyses of the Hantavirus Envelope Glycoprotein Gc. PLoS Pathogens, 2016, 12 (10), pp.e1005813. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813. pasteur-01390226

HAL Id: pasteur-01390226

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-01390226v1

Submitted on 1 Nov 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

click for updates

RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Mechanistic Insight into Bunyavirus-Induced Membrane Fusion from Structure-Function Analyses of the Hantavirus Envelope Glycoprotein Gc

Pablo Guardado-Calvo<sup>1,2e</sup>, Eduardo A. Bignon<sup>3e</sup>, Eva Stettner<sup>1na</sup>, Scott Allen Jeffers<sup>1nb</sup>, Jimena Pérez-Vargas<sup>1,2nc</sup>, Gerard Pehau-Arnaudet<sup>4,5</sup>, M. Alejandra Tortorici<sup>1,2</sup>, Jean-Luc Jestin<sup>1nd</sup>, Patrick England<sup>5,6</sup>, Nicole D. Tischler<sup>3*</sup>, Félix A. Rey<sup>1,2*</sup>

1 Institut Pasteur, Unité de Virologie Structurale, Département de Virologie, Paris, France, 2 CNRS UMR3569 Virologie, Paris, France, 3 Fundación Ciencia & Vida, Molecular Virology Laboratory, Santiago, Chile, 4 Institut Pasteur, Ultrapole, Département de Biologie Cellulaire et Infection, Paris, France, 5 CNRS UMR 3528, Paris, France, 6 Institut Pasteur, Plateforme de Biophysique des Macromolécules et de leurs Interactions, Département de Biologie Structurale et Chimie, Paris, France

e These authors contributed equally to this work.

na Current address: Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

nb Current address: Brammer Bio LLC, Alachua, Florida, United States of America

nc Current address: CIRI, International Centre for Infectiology Research, team EVIR, Inserm U1111, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France

nd Current address: Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, Bures-sur-Yvette, France

* ntischler@cienciavida.org (NDT); felix.rey@pasteur.fr (FAR)

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Guardado-Calvo P, Bignon EA, Stettner E, Jeffers SA, Pérez-Vargas J, Pehau-Arnaudet G, et al. (2016) Mechanistic Insight into Bunyavirus-Induced Membrane Fusion from Structure-Function Analyses of the Hantavirus Envelope Glycoprotein Gc. PLoS Pathog 12(10): e1005813. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813

**Editor:** Richard J. Kuhn, Purdue University, UNITED STATES

**Received:** June 14, 2016

**Accepted:** July 17, 2016

**Published:** October 26, 2016

**Copyright:** © 2016 Guardado-Calvo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The coordinate files of the structures described in this manuscript have been submitted to the Protein Data Bank, and the corresponding accession codes are listed in the S1 Table.

**Funding:** FAR and PGC acknowledge support the Infect-ERA IMI European network, program "HantaHunt" and its coordinator, Professor Andreas Herrmann. FAR also received funding from the "Integrative Biology of Emerging

## Abstract

Hantaviruses are zoonotic viruses transmitted to humans by persistently infected rodents, giving rise to serious outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) or of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), depending on the virus, which are associated with high case fatality rates. There is only limited knowledge about the organization of the viral particles and in particular, about the hantavirus membrane fusion glycoprotein Gc, the function of which is essential for virus entry. We describe here the X-ray structures of Gc from Hantaan virus, the type species hantavirus and responsible for HFRS, both in its neutral pH, monomeric pre-fusion conformation, and in its acidic pH, trimeric post-fusion form. The structures confirm the prediction that Gc is a class II fusion protein, containing the characteristic β-sheet rich domains termed I, II and III as initially identified in the fusion proteins of arboviruses such as alpha- and flaviviruses. The structures also show a number of features of Gc that are distinct from arbovirus class II proteins. In particular, hantavirus Gc inserts residues from three different loops into the target membrane to drive fusion, as confirmed functionally by structure-guided mutagenesis on the HPS-inducing Andes virus, instead of having a single "fusion loop". We further show that the membrane interacting region of Gc becomes structured only at acidic pH via a set of polar and electrostatic interactions. Furthermore, the structure reveals that hantavirus Gc has an additional N-terminal "tail" that is crucial in stabilizing the post-fusion trimer, accompanying the swapping of domain III in the quaternary arrangement of the trimer as compared to the standard class II fusion proteins.
Infectious Diseases" Labex (Laboratoire d'Excellence) grant N° ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID (French Government's "Investissements d'Avenir" program). ES was funded as "Experienced Researcher" (ER) by the Marie Curie Training Network "Virus Entry" (Call:FP7-PEOPLE-2007-1-1-ITN. NDT received support from FONDECYT 1140050 and Basal PFB-16 grants from CONICYT (Chile). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

**Competing Interests:** I have read the journal's policy and I understand that one of the authors of this manuscript (SAJ) has competing interests because of being employed by Brammer Bio LLC, 13702 Innovation Drive Alachua FL 32615.

The mechanistic understandings derived from these data are likely to provide a unique handle for devising treatments against these human pathogens.

## Author Summary

Hantaviruses belong to the *Bunyaviridae* family of enveloped viruses. This family englobes in total five established genera: *Tospovirus* (infecting plants), and *Phlebovirus*, *Orthobunyavirus*, *Nairovirus* and *Hantavirus* infecting animals, some of which cause serious disease in humans. An important characteristic of the hantaviruses is that they are not transmitted to humans by arthropod vectors, as those from the other genera, but by direct exposure to excretions from infected small mammals. As all enveloped viruses, they require the activity of a membrane fusogenic protein, Gc, for entry into their target cells. Our structural analysis of the hantavirus fusion protein Gc led to the identification of a conserved pattern of cysteines involved in disulfide bonds stabilizing the Gc fold. This motif is matched exclusively by all of the available bunyavirus Gc sequences in the database, with the notable exception of phlebovirus Gc, which appears closer in structure to the fusion proteins of other families of arthropod-borne viruses, such as the flaviviruses and alphaviruses. This analysis further suggests mechanistic similarities with hantaviruses in the fusion mechanism of viruses in the remaining three most closely related bunyavirus genera, which we propose belong to a new separate sub-class of fusion proteins with a multipartite membrane targeting region.

## Introduction

Hantaviruses are a small group of zoonotic viruses of rodents, bats and insectivores such as moles and shrews [1]. They are often transmitted to humans by persistently infected rodents, causing serious outbreaks of pulmonary syndrome or of hemorrhagic disease with renal syndrome [2, 3]. The case fatality rates can reach 50%, for instance in the case of the "Sin Nombre" hantavirus outbreak in the 1990s in the four-corners area in the US [4]. The name hantavirus derives from the prototype virus, Hantaan virus, which was discovered in the early 1950s during the Korean war, when troops stationed by the Hantaan river developed hemorrhagic manifestations [5]. Outbreaks of hantavirus disease of varying severity have occurred periodically in the last decades throughout the Americas [6, 7] and in Europe and Asia [8, 9]. It is therefore important to understand the structural organization of hantavirus particles as a step forward in attempts to devise curative or preventative strategies.

Hantaviruses constitute one of five genera forming the *Bunyaviridae* family of enveloped RNA viruses, which have a genome composed of three segments of single-stranded RNA of negative polarity [10]. The bunyavirus proteins involved in genome replication—the large (L) polymerase and the nucleocapsid (N) protein, encoded in the large and small genome segment, respectively—are very similar to their counterparts in other families of segmented negative-strand (sns)RNA viruses, such as the *Arenaviridae* or the *Orthomyxoviruses* [11]. In contrast, the envelope glycoproteins, which derive from a polyprotein precursor encoded in the medium (M) size genomic segment, are totally unrelated. Whereas the other snsRNA virus families display class I membrane fusion proteins characterized by a central alpha-helical coiled-coil in their post-fusion form, the bunyavirus envelope proteins have properties of class II enveloped viruses [12]; i.e., they are β-sheet-rich proteins (as predicted from their amino acid sequences)
such as those found in the icosahedrally symmetric flaviviruses and alphaviruses. The latter, like viruses in the Bunyaviridae family other than the hantaviruses, are transmitted to vertebrates (or to plants in the case of tospoviruses) by insect or tick vectors, and are accordingly termed arthropod-borne viruses or “arboviruses”.

In class II viruses, the membrane fusion protein is the second in a tandem of proteins—Gn and Gc in the bunyaviruses—encoded sequentially within a single precursor polyprotein. They heterodimerize in the ER and are then transported to the site of budding, which is the Golgi apparatus for a number of bunyaviruses [13], although some hantaviruses were reported to bud at the plasma membrane [14, 15]. The bunyavirus Gc glycoproteins were predicted to adopt a “class II” fold using proteomic computational analyses [16], and Gc from Andes virus (a hantavirus endemic in South America) was modeled using the flavivirus E protein as template [17], thereby predicting the location of the “fusion loop”, which was later functionally confirmed as important for fusion by site directed mutagenesis [18]. Similarly, for La Crosse virus in the *Orthobunyavirus* genus, mutagenesis of the predicted fusion loop region—deduced by comparison to the alphavirus fusion glycoprotein E1—confirmed the importance of this region for entry [19]. More recently, the determination of the crystal structure of Gc of the Rift Valley Fever virus [20], a bunyavirus in the *Phlebovirus* genus, demonstrated that it indeed has the typical fold of class II membrane fusion proteins, providing a conclusive proof. These observations are compatible with the icosahedral organization of the phleboviral particles observed by electron microscopy [21, 22]. Extrapolation to the other genera should be done with caution, however, since the sequence similarity is very low and not easily detectable by current methods. In the case of the *Flaviviridae* family, for instance, where viruses outside the *Flavivirus* genus were also expected to have class II fusion proteins, the prediction was proven wrong when the corresponding crystal structures were determined, i.e. the E2 protein from the pestiviruses [23, 24] and from the hepatitis C virus [25, 26].

Structural studies on members of the *Bunyaviridae* family are relatively limited, providing the low-resolution overall arrangement of spikes at the virus surface, but not the organization of the individual proteins. Differently to the icosahedral organization observed in virions of the *Phlebovirus* [21, 22] and *Orthobunyavirus* [27] genera, hantavirus particles were shown to be pleomorphic, with some virions showing a roughly spherical and others an elongated aspect [28]. Cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging revealed that the Gn/Gc spikes are arranged with apparent 4-fold symmetry [29, 30] on a curved square lattice, incompatible with icosahedral symmetry. The resulting array of hantavirus spikes does not cover the whole surface of the observed particles. The organization of the Gn/Gc subunits within the spikes was interpreted as a (GnGc)₄ hetero-octamer. A recent study described the crystal structure of the Gn ectodomain of Puumala hantavirus, which was docked on the spike using the 3D reconstruction of Tula hantavirus extended to 16Å resolution, placing Gn at an exposed site on the spike, distal to the viral membrane [31].

Here, we report the crystal structure of the ectodomain of Gc from Hantaan virus in a monomeric pre-fusion conformation and in its trimeric post-fusion form, validating its prediction as a class II fusion protein, albeit presenting a number of hantavirus-specific features. Combined with structure-guided functional studies on the related Andes virus, we show that hantavirus Gc has a multi-partite membrane interaction surface, with residues outside the cd loop (which is the fusion loop in standard class II proteins) also being important for membrane insertion and fusion. We further show that Gc requires the formation of a carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond, which can form only at acidic pH, for structuring the membrane interacting region. In addition, we show that hantavirus Gc has an N-terminal segment (the “N tail”) which is absent in other class II proteins and which is functionally involved in trimerization to form the stable post-fusion form. Further analysis also identifies a conserved “cysteine”
signature in the amino acid sequence of Gc giving rise to a disulfide bonding pattern conserved in the *Nairovirus*, *Orthobunyavirus* and *Tospovirus* genera, but notably different from the phlebovirus Gc.

## Results

### The hantavirus Gc ectodomain is monomeric in solution

We expressed the recombinant ectodomain of Gc (rGc) from Hantaan virus strain 76-118 (UniProtKB/SwissProt accession: P08668.1) in *Drosophila* S2 cells as described in Materials and Methods. It behaved in solution as a monomer, both at neutral and acidic pH, as assessed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and multi-angle static light scattering (MALS) (S1A Fig). Electron micrographs of negatively stained samples of purified rGc showed a thin rod-like molecule of ~140 Å in length (see below). Despite multiple trials, rGc failed to crystallize on its own, and we therefore screened a human single-chain variable domain (scFv) antibody fragment library, which in principle was hantavirus-naïve [32], to identify potential binders that could act as crystallization chaperones. We thus identified scFv A5, which is very close to its germ line (Table 1) and which interacted with rGc as monitored by ELISA (see Methods). Further analysis by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) together with multi-angle light scattering (MALS), showed that scFv A5 forms a 1:1 complex with rGc (S1B Fig).

We obtained crystals diffracting to 3Å resolution of the A5/rGc complex at pH 7.5, after limited proteolysis of the complex with trypsin. This treatment removed a C-terminal segment of rGc and the purification tags of both, A5 and rGc. We determined the X-ray structure by a combination of molecular replacement with the variable domains of an antibody and the anomalous scattering from a samarium derivative (see Materials and Methods). The final electron density map was clear for amino acids (aa) 16-414 of rGc (out of residues 1-457 in the intact Gc ectodomain, Fig 1A), with internal breaks at loops 84-91 and 108-132 (Fig 1B). These disordered segments map to the tip of domain II, at the membrane interacting region, as discussed below. All A5 residues were clearly resolved in density, except for the linker connecting light and heavy chains in the scFv construct. An atomic model of the complex was built into the electron density with the program Coot and refined with Phenix.refine to an R factor of 22% and free R factor of 27% (S1 Table). The scFv makes an important contribution to the packing contacts in the crystal. The antibody buries about 1,000 Å² of the accessible surface of rGc, with 60% of the contacts made by the light chain (which is un-mutated with respect to its germ line, see Table 1). In spite of the relatively large buried antibody/antigen surface, affinity measurements by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) indicated an A5:rGc binding constant in

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Germ line analysis of scFv A5.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">V-H/V-L allele</th><th>V-H/V-L</th><th>V-H/V-L aa</th><th>J-H allele</th><th>D-H allele</th><th>CDR length</th><th colspan="2">BASA (%)</th></tr><tr><th>diverg<sup>II</sup></th><th>ch/tot<sup>II</sup></th><th></th><th></th><th>[1:2:3]</th><th>CDR[1:2:3]</th><th>[CDR:FWR]</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Heavy chain</th><td>IGHV4-4*02</td><td>1.38% (4/288)</td><td>3/98</td><td>IGHJ1*01<sup>†</sup></td><td>IGHD2-2*01</td><td>[9:7:6]<sup>§</sup></td><td>[14:20:6]<sup>§</sup></td><td>[40:1]<sup>§</sup></td></tr><tr><th>Light chain</th><td>IGLV3-19*01</td><td>0.00% (0/279)</td><td>0/96</td><td>IGLJ2*01<sup>†</sup></td><td>-</td><td>[6:3:11]<sup>§</sup></td><td>[33:4:14]<sup>§</sup></td><td>[51:8]<sup>§</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

V-H, J-H, D-H. V-L, J-L represent the putative human genes and alleles predicted by IMGT analysis [33].

†Additional possibilities were also predicted by IMGT

II Nucleotide (nt) divergence (diverg.). The total length for all V-H and V-L alleles is 288 nt for heavy chain and 279 nt for light chain.

¶Number of amino acid (aa) changes out of total V-H/V-L aa length (ch/tot).

BASA: (buried accessible surface areas) calculation for CDR and FRW regions shown as percentage of the total BASA of ScFv within the complex and per individual H-CDRs [1:2:3] and L-CDRs[1:2:3] or as a sum for light/heavy chain CDRs and FWRs [CDR:FWR].

§IMGT definition of CDR and FRW regions.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.t001
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
**Fig 1. Structure of Hantaan virus Gc.** A) Organization of the hantavirus M genomic RNA segment. The black striped regions represent the non-coding 3' and 5' RNA ends, with the single open-reading frame in between. Regions corresponding to the signal sequences for Gn and Gc are in cyan, and other trans-membrane regions are in dark grey. The black line below indicates the region spanned by the recombinant Gc ectodomain (rGc). B) The rGc / scFv A5 complex. Gc is colored according to domains with domains I, II, and III in red, yellow, and blue, respectively, with secondary structure elements labeled. The linker between domains I and III is shown in cyan, and the C-terminal end in magenta (beginning of the "stem" region). The disulfide bonds are displayed as sticks with sulfur atoms in green, and numbered in green. The scFvA5 is shown with the heavy chain dark green and the light chain in grey. The lower panel shows an orthogonal view of Gc, with the scFvA5 removed for clarity. The single N-linked glycan Asn280 is labeled. Dotted lines indicate the disordered region, corresponding to the cd loop (orange) and the distant end of the bc loop (yellow). C) The Gc surface colored according to domains, with the epitopes of—and sites of escape mutation to— neutralizing antibodies mapped in grey or green in different shades. The protein is shown in the same two orthogonal views of B. D) Multiple sequence alignment of Gc from seven representative hantaviruses. Strictly conserved and highly similar residues are highlighted in red or brown background, respectively. All the cysteines are shown in a green background, and asparagine residues within N-linked glycosylation motifs in a blue background. The corresponding host is noted as MUR (*Murinae*), SIG (*Sigmodontinae*), ARV (*Arvicolinae*) corresponding to rodent subfamilies and as INS (Insectivores), and BAT (*Chiroptera*). The secondary structure elements are displayed above the sequences, on a background colored according to the tertiary structure, as in panel B. The missing regions are in grey or black (within the colored tertiary structure bar, a top grey half bar denotes residues disordered in the neutral pH structure, and a bottom black half bar those not visible in the post-fusion structure). A hashed grey bar denotes the TM segment. Disulfide bonds are numbered in green below the sequences. The domain III residues involved in inter-subunit interactions with the Asn280 glycan in the post-fusion trimer are marked with a green star under the alignment.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g001

the micromolar range, in line with the absence of affinity maturation of the human scFv library
(S1C and S1D Fig).

Hantavirus Gc has a typical class II fold

The structure shows that Gc displays a typical class II fusion protein fold (Fig 1), first observed
in the ectodomain of the flavivirus E [34] and alphavirus E1 [35] fusion proteins, and more
recently in the rubella virus E1 glycoprotein [36] and in phlebovirus Gc [20]–the only other
genus of the *Bunyaviridae* family for which a Gc structure is available. The class II fold features
a central β-sandwich domain (termed domain I) made of eight β-strands labeled B₀ through I₀,
connected sequentially with up-and-down topology and arranged in two antiparallel β-sheets,
the “inner” B₀I₀H₀G₀ and the “outer” C₀D₀E₀F₀ sheets apposed against each other (the names
of the β-sheets refer to their orientation in the post-fusion trimer). Like flavivirus E and phlebo-
virus Gc, hantavirus Gc has an additional short N-terminal β-strand, A₀, which starts at residue
18 and runs parallel to strand C₀ at the edge of the outer sheet. The N-terminal segment,
upstream of strand A₀ and which contains a number of residues strictly conserved across the
*Hantavirus* genus (Fig 1D), is disordered in the crystals.

The segments connecting β-strands D₀ to E₀ in the outer sheet and H₀ to I₀ in the inner
sheet are very long and elaborated. They make up domain II (yellow in the Figures), which is
composed of 13 β-strands (labeled *a* through *l*) and a couple of short helices (η1 and α2, Fig 1).
Strand *j*', unique to hantavirus Gc and inserted between helix α2 and strand *k* (Fig 1D) carries
the single Gc N-linked glycosylation site at Asn280 (Fig 1B), which is strictly conserved across
hantaviruses (Fig 1D). Domain II has an elongated shape with two subdomains, a central,
domain I-proximal open β-barrel made of β-strands *klaefgj*', and a distal "tip"—a β-sandwich
between the *bdc* β-sheet and the *ij* β-hairpin, which projects the *cd* loop (which is the fusion
loop in the standard arbovirus class II proteins) at its distal end. This region corresponds to the
disordered Gc tip in the crystal structure, stabilized in part by the scFv A5 (Fig 1B). Finally,
after strand I₀, domain I connects via a 12 residue linker (cyan in Fig 1) to domain III (blue),
which has an immunoglobulin superfamily C2 subtype fold [37] composed of β-strands A
through G (Fig 1B and 1D).

Hantavirus Gc has a total of 26 cysteine residues in the ectodomain, 24 of which are present
in the crystallized fragment, making 12 disulfide bonds. The surface area buried at the interface
between domains I and III is very small, and is stabilized in the crystals by a cobalt-hexamine
ion (Fig 1B), which was identified in crystal optimization screens to improve the diffraction of the crystals.

## Epitopes on Gc

Although Gn was shown to be displayed prominently on the hantavirus spikes, and some of the epitopes of neutralizing antibodies were mapped there [31], a number of hantavirus neutralizing antibodies target Gc as well. The only neutralization escape mutant mapping to Gc reported in the literature corresponds to an S287F change in Puumala hantavirus Gc and confers escape from neutralizing Mab 1C9 [38], which maps to the *k* strand on one side of domain II (Fig 1C). There are also data on Gc residues that affect binding of neutralizing antibodies for various other hantaviruses. Although often such epitopes are conformational and cannot be mimicked by peptides, the epitope of the neutralizing murine Mabs 3G1 and 3D8 [39] against Hantaan virus have been respectively mapped by peptide scanning to residues 96–105 [40] and 242–248 [41]. The 3G1 epitope thus maps to the *bc* loop and largely overlaps with that of scFv A5, whereas the 3D8 epitope maps to the *i* strand, at the opposite side (Fig 1C). The epitope of a human antibody against Hantaan virus, Y5, was also identified by peptide scanning, and mapped to two discontinuous segments of the Gc polypeptide, 268–276 and 307–315 [42], which correspond, respectively, to the region around helix α2 in domain II and to the end of strand I₀ and the linker between domains I and III (see Fig 1C and 1D). These two segments are far apart on the Gc monomer, but may be located more closely in a multimeric arrangement of Gc on the hantavirus spike. Although the docking of Gn appeared to be clear in the reported 16Å resolution electron density map of Tula hantavirus [31] and allowed to understand how the Gn epitopes are exposed on the spike, docking rGc is less clear in the same map and will need to await higher resolution data and/or a crystal structure of a Gn/Gc heterodimer to unambiguously assess where the Gc epitopes lie on the spike. In particular, as the epitopes map toward the Gc tip, which is partially disordered in the crystals, the conformation of this flexible region may be affected by Gn-Gc interactions on the spike.

## Interaction of rGc with lipids

We investigated the behavior of rGc in interaction with lipids, and found that it binds liposomes at acidic pH as detected by flotation on sucrose gradients and by SPR on a matrix with immobilized liposomes (see Materials & Methods) (S2A Fig). The SPR measurements also detected binding to liposomes at pH 7.4 (S2B Fig), although to a lower extent than at pH 5.5. We found that the interaction required the presence of cholesterol in the liposomes (Fig 2A), in agreement with recent studies [43]. Addition of the scFv A5 interfered with lipid binding (Fig 2A), in line with its epitope lying close to the membrane interacting region of Gc (Fig 1). Because the A5 epitope overlaps with that of the neutralizing Mab 3G1, our data suggest that the neutralization mechanism of antibodies targeting this region involves blocking membrane insertion of Gc.

Electron microscopy showed that the Gc proteoliposomes display radial projections with a shorter and thicker aspect than the observed overall shape of monomeric rGc in solution (Fig 2B). The rGc projections on the liposomes are very similar in size and shape to the trimeric projections made by class II viral fusion proteins in their post-fusion conformation on liposomes [36, 44, 45]. This similarity suggested that rGc had adopted its predicted post-fusion conformation, as recently evidenced for Andes virus Gc by sucrose sedimentation in an *in vitro* system [46]. Because attempts to crystallize the membrane inserted form of rGc failed, we introduced a mutation in the predicted fusion loop, which caused rosette formation upon concentration after detergent solubilization (in line with the model for insertion of trimeric post-
A

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

B

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

C

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

D

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

E

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

F

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>
**Fig 2. Gc interactions with lipids and post-fusion structure.** A) scFv A5 specifically inhibits liposome binding by rGc as measured by SPR. The liposomes were immobilized on an SPR chip (see Methods) and Gc alone or together with scFv A5 at increased concentrations was injected to measure binding (top panel). The same experiment with an unrelated, non-binding scFv is provided as control in the lower panel. B) Left panel: Electron micrographs of negative stained samples of rGc show long thin rods with dimensions comparable to the neutral pH structure shown in Fig 1B and 1C. Right Panel: Incubation of rGc with liposomes (see Materials and Methods for lipid composition) at low pH results in rGc insertion into the membranes, with a concomitant change in aspect to resemble class II viral fusion proteins inserted into liposomes in their post-fusion, trimeric conformation (as shown previously for alphaviruses and flaviviruses). C) The structure of the Gc trimer crystallized at pH 6.5 (W115H mutant) displays the typical class II post-fusion conformation. The protomer in the foreground is shown in ribbons colored by domains, with the single glycosylation site at Asn280 in sticks, as well as key residues at the tip of domain II. The two protomers in the background are shown as surfaces, one colored in grey and the other by domains, with the glycan surface in green. The structure determination used a W115H mutant, but the representation shows the location of the mutated tryptophan (labeled). The trimer axis is drawn in black. D) Conformational transition of rGc. The neutral pH monomeric form colored gray and the low pH trimer subunit colored according to domains were superposed on domain I and are shown in two views to highlight the overall reorganization of the molecule. The left panel shows the axis (nearly normal to the plane of the Figure) about which domain III pivots by more than 120 degrees. The right panel shows the 26 degrees hinge of domain II about the domain I/II junction. E) Close up view (from the top) of the tip of domain II showing the structuring role of Asn118. The polypeptide chain is shown in yellow except for the cd loop (orange), with non-carbon atoms in different color (nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur in blue, red and green, respectively). Asn118 is highlighted in white sticks with an orange outline. Its side chain carboxamide group donates two hydrogen bonds (yellow dots) to the main chain carbonyls of Cys122 and Gly124, and accepts a hydrogen bond from the main chain amide of Ser114. In addition, the main chain carbonyl of Asn118 accepts two hydrogen bonds from the *ij* loop, from the main chain amide groups of Ala251 and Thr252. Note that Asn118 is framed by disulfides 4 (immediately upstream) and 1 (downstream), which connect the cd loop to the *ij* and *bc* loops, respectively. Trp115 and Phe250, discussed in the paper, are displayed in sticks, as a guide. F) Cartoon to show the swapping of β-strand A₀ during trimerization. The left panel shows domain I in the pre-fusion conformation, with inner and outer β-sheets in yellow and green, respectively. The short A₀ strand runs antiparallel to C₀ at one edge of the outer β-sheet (indicated in yellow to highlight that it becomes part of the inner sheet in the post-fusion form). In the trimer, the A₀ strand swaps to the adjacent domain I (depicted with inner and outer β sheets in pink and red, respectively), to run antiparallel to the B₀ strand in the inner β-sheet. For clarity, the front subunit in the trimer (which would have inner and outer sheets in pale and dark blue) was removed, leaving only its A₀ strand, which inserts into the β-sandwich of the yellow/green domain (on which the monomer was superposed for this view). The "pink" A₀ strand inserts into the blue subunit (not displayed for clarity). Downstream strand I₀, the domain I-III linker runs alongside the inserted A₀ strand in the trimer, swapping also domain III, which is further downstream (see panel C). The limits of strand A₀ are labeled, to show what residues rearrange (see also the secondary structure diagram in Fig 1D).

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g002

fusion class II proteins into membranes, reviewed in [47, 48]). The fusion loop mutation was inspired by a recent report showing that the trimeric post-fusion form of the flavivirus class II fusion protein E could be crystallized in its post-fusion, trimeric form in the absence of detergent by replacing Trp 101 by histidine, as this residue is prominently exposed at the membrane facing-end of the post-fusion trimer [49]. We accordingly substituted Trp115, predicted to be at the tip of the *cd* loop in hantavirus Gc [18] by histidine. The rGc W115H mutant indeed crystallized under mildly acidic conditions (pH 6.5) in the rhombohedral space group R3, and the crystals diffracted to 1.6Å resolution.

## The post-fusion form of Gc

We determined the crystal structure of acid-pH rGc by molecular replacement using the individual domains of Gc, and refined the atomic model to 1.6 Å resolution to an R factor of 14% (free R factor 17%) (S1 Table). A single Gc protomer (or trimer subunit) is present in the asymmetric unit of the crystals, packing about a crystallographic 3-fold axis and adopting the characteristic class II post-fusion form (Fig 2C). As in the other class II proteins [36, 50–53], the post-fusion form shows a drastic re-orientation of domain III such that it packs laterally against the domain I/II junction of both, the same and the adjacent subunits in the trimer (Fig 2C). This relocation of domain III is in line with recent data showing that exogenous domain III can block the fusion process [54] by binding to the domain I/II inner trimer core and interfering
with the necessary translocation of domain III to reach the post-fusion hairpin conformation, as had been shown earlier for alpha- and flaviviruses [55]. The Gc structures show that during the pre- to post-fusion transition, domain II hinges by 26 degrees about the domain I/II junction, thereby bringing the domain II tips of the three protomers into contact at the trimer tip (Fig 2D). The A5 epitope remains accessible on the trimer, and modeling shows that three scFvs can bind simultaneously to one trimer (S2C Fig). The observed inhibition of trimer insertion is likely due to the scFv protruding further at the tip of the trimer than the fusion loop itself, helping the complex to remain in solution.

The buried area per Gc subunit in the trimer is 2290 Å², and the residues at the interface are mostly hydrophilic and conserved (S3 Fig). In contrast to the neutral pH form, the tip of domain II, (the cd loop but also the neighboring parts of the bc and ij loops) displayed clear electron density and allowed tracing the polypeptide chain with no breaks. As expected, the side chain of Trp115 (which is His115 in the mutant used for the crystals) is exposed at the very tip of domain II, where it would be expected to insert into membranes. In a previous study, Trp115 was indeed shown to be essential for fusion activity of Andes hantavirus [18]. That study also showed that Asn118 in the cd loop was essential for membrane fusion. The low pH structure now shows that the Asn118 side chain makes a crucial set of hydrogen bond interactions with the peptide backbone of the cd loop and its main chain with the ij loop (Fig 2E). This key structuring-role of the domain II tip explains the strict conservation of Asn118 across hantaviruses (Fig 1D) and its functional importance for fusion.

## A carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond is critical to structure the tip of domain II

In addition to the role of Asn118 in structuring the fusion loop, we observed that the disorder at the tip of domain II in the monomeric, pre-fusion form of Gc begins at residue Asp108 in β-strand c, within a strictly conserved 106-EXD-108 amino acid motif (where X is any amino acid) (Fig 1D). In the post-fusion structure, the side-chain of Glu106 is connected via hydrogen-bonds to the indole ring of the strictly conserved Trp98 and to the Asp108 side chain (Fig 3A, left panel), making a relatively short (2.6 Å distance) carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond. The pK of the amino acids in the latter interaction is therefore shifted in the structure, which was obtained at pH 6.5 (see S1 Table) (the normal pK of glutamic and aspartic acid is 4.2 and 3.8, respectively), such that a proton is present in between. Of note, in crystals of rGc also at pH 6.5 obtained in the presence of KCl at concentrations above 200 mM, Gc was in its post-fusion form but the tip was disordered (S4 Fig). The crystal-packing environment was not responsible for the observed disorder, as the crystals were isomorphous, having the same symmetry and the same cell parameters, and diffracting to high resolution (around 1.4 Å).

Inspection of the structure further showed that a K⁺ ion from the crystallization conditions becomes trapped near the central 3-fold axis of the rGc trimer, coordinated by the side chain hydroxyl group of Tyr105 together with the main-chain carbonyl oxygens of Phe240, Gly242 of the same subunit and of Asp259 from a neighboring protomer, as well as an immobilized water molecule (Fig 3B). Tyr105 directly precedes the di-carboxylate 106-EXD-108 motif, and as it adjusts its orientation to chelate the K⁺ ion, it alters the main chain such that Glu106 is pulled away from the interaction with Asp108, becoming de-protonated and now accepting hydrogen bonds from the imidazole ring of His104, while still maintaining the interaction with the indole ring of Trp98 (Fig 3A, middle panel). These results therefore indicate that formation of the carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond is essential to the organization of the tip of domain II, and that the reason why this region is disordered in the neutral pH structure is that this interaction cannot form (Fig 3A, right panel). This disordered region in Gc at neutral pH
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 3.** A carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond structures the domain II tip. A) Left panel: the Glu106 side chain is at the center of a string of hydrogen bonds linking the side chains of Asp108 and Trp98 through that of Glu106. The overall network also involves the phenol group of Tyr96 making a hydrogen bond with the main chain carbonyl of Cys91 in the *bc* loop (involved in disulfide bond 2, connecting the *bc* loop to the *d* strand) and via a water molecule to the imidazole ring of His86 (located at the end of the *b* strand, not displayed for clarity). See the corresponding electron density in the matching *S1 Movie*. Middle panel: the shift in position of Tyr105 to chelate the K⁺ ion affects Glu106, such that its pK drops and becomes deprotonated. It now accepts a bifurcated hydrogen bond from the imidazole ring of His104, while the phenol group of Tyr96 now donates a hydrogen bond to Asp108, releasing a set of interactions that lead to de-structuring of the *cd* loop and the N-terminal part of the *bc* loop (dotted lines). In particular, the side chain of Cys91 becomes disordered, and only the side chain of its partner in disulfide bond 2 remains partially visible (Cys129). The corresponding electron density in shown in the *S2 Movie*. Right panel: the tip of domain II at neutral pH from the structure of the complex with scFv A5 (which was removed, for clarity). Although the resolution of this structure is lower (3 Å instead of 1.6 Å and 1.4 Å) and the hydrogen bond interactions are less well defined than in the structures of the Gc trimer, it is clear that at neutral pH Glu106 accepts a hydrogen bond from His99. The corresponding electron density is shown in the *S3 Movie*. Asp108 is the last residue with a visible side chain, and is too far to interact with E106. At this pH, such an interaction is not expected, since both side chains will be</figcaption></figure>
negatively charged and repel each other. B) Close view of the K⁺ binding site, near the 3-fold axis on the Gc trimer when crystallized in the presence of KCl at concentrations above 200 mM. The reference protomer is colored yellow and an adjacent one dark grey. The third protomer is not displayed, for clarity, and the 3-fold axis is represented in light blue. β-strands are labeled. The K⁺ ion is shown as a small green sphere, and the residues involved in its coordination are depicted in sticks, as well as Glu106, which forms the carboxylate-carboxylic acid hydrogen bond at low pH in the absence of KCl. Except for Tyr105, the K⁺ coordinating atoms are all from the main chain. The various crystal structures at different KCl concentrations are summarized in the S4 Fig and in the S4 Movie. C) and D) Andes virus Gc mutants in the residues involved in the side chain Asp108-Glu106-Trp98 hydrogen bond network are impaired in membrane fusion activity. The expression level and plasma membrane localization of these mutants (which concern residues strictly conserved in the hantavirus genus, Fig 1D) is provided in the S5 Fig, which shows that they reach the cell surface in similar amounts as wild type. C) Syncytia formation of cells expressing Gn and wild type or mutant Gc when exposed at the indicated pH. Fluorescence microscopy employing three different stains was used for the quantitation of cells and nuclei and syncytia formation results from at least n = 2 experiments were averaged (see the S6 Fig). D) Entry of Vero E6 by SIV particles pseudotyped with Andes virus spikes with wild type Gn and either Gc wild type or the indicated mutant (Gn/Gc pp). Reporter gene (GFP) expressing cells were quantified by cell cytometry (S7 Fig).

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g003

is in line with the altered mobility of Gc in SEC at the two pH values measured, with the mono-
mer at neutral pH displaying a larger Stokes radius for the same molecular mass (S1A Fig).

We tested the functional relevance of these interactions in the Andes hantavirus system, for which it was shown that expression of the M genomic segment (i.e., coding for wild type Gn and Gc proteins) in cells induces syncytium formation when treated at low pH. We thus introduced each of the following Gc substitutions: E106A, E106Q, D108A, D108N and W98A into Andes virus Gc using this plasmid, and compared syncytium formation by the mutants and by the wild type protein. Although the level of Gn and Gc that reached the cell surface was similar to wild type (S5 Fig), there was no syncytium induced by the mutants except for D108N (Fig 3C), which can still make a hydrogen bond with the Glu106 side chain (Fig 3A, left panel). The reverse situation, in the E106Q mutant, is not viable, indicating that the Glu106 side chain is essential in this process, perhaps because of its dual interaction with Asp108 and Trp98 (Fig 3A, left panel). We confirmed these results by introducing the same mutations into a system of SIV particles pseudotyped with the Andes virus glycoproteins, which allows visualization of entry by expression of a fluorescent reporter gene [56]. Again, only the D108N mutant was as efficient as wild type for entry (Fig 3D), whereas none of the other mutants was, in spite of being present in similar amounts as wild type Gn and Gc on these particles (S5 Fig). The requirement for a glutamic acid to be protonated in order to organize the structure of the domain II tip only upon acidification is unique to hantavirus Gc, as it has not been described so far for any other membrane fusion protein.

The Gc N tail and its interactions with domain III

An important difference with the post-fusion structures of the arbovirus class II proteins is that in the quaternary organization of hantavirus Gc, domain III takes the place occupied in the other trimers by its counterpart from a neighboring protomer. This had been observed previously in the structure of the rubella virus E1 glycoprotein in its post-fusion conformation (Fig 4A), the only other non-arbovirus viral class II protein of known structure [36]. In this altered quaternary organization of the Gc trimer, the strictly conserved glycan chain of Gc at Asn280 in domain II fits snugly into a groove at the subunit interface, with the glycan making a number of inter-chain hydrogen bonds with hydrophilic amino acids at the domain III surface from the adjacent subunit (Fig 4B). Ablation of this glycosylation site in Hantaan virus Gc was shown to give rise to a Gn/Gc glycoprotein complex that was able to reach the cell surface [57], but could not induce syncytium of transfected cells upon low pH treatment [58]. These observations are in line with the added trimer stability provided by the glycan contacts.

The domain III swap is accompanied by the N tail and by strand A₀ (residues 19-21 in the pre-fusion form), which switches from its parallel interaction with strand B₀ to run antiparallel
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 4.** Domain III is “swapped” in the post-fusion Gc trimer with respect to the standard arbovirus class II fusion proteins. A) Comparison of the post-fusion Gc trimer with the other class II fusion proteins of known structure. A cartoon representation of Hantaan virus Gc next to the rubella virus E1 (labeled RV; PDB</figcaption></figure>
entry 4B3V [36]) to its left, and Semliki Forest Virus E1 (alphavirus, labeled SFV; PDB entry 1RER [51]), the Dengue virus serotype 1 E protein (flavivirus, labeled DV1; 4GSX [49]), and the *C. elegans* cellular fusogen EFF-1 (4OJC [59]). A « fused membrane » is diagramed above, with aliphatic and hydrophilic layers in dark and light gray, respectively. In each trimer, a "reference" subunit is shown in bright standard class II colors (with the stem region in dark pink), the anticlockwise subunit when looking from the membrane in pale colors, and the third in light grey. Disulfide bonds are green, and glycan chains are shown in gold sticks with a red outline. The trimer axes are drawn in each case. Note that the non-arthropod-borne rubiviruses and hantaviruses have domain III swapped with respect to the others (i.e, the dark blue domain III is to the right and not to the left, as in the others). Note also two features specific of hantavirus Gc: the N tail (boxed in red) interacting with the domain I-III linker and with domain III, and the Asn280 glycan interacting with a neighboring protomer (boxed in blue). B) Close up view showing the inter-subunit contacts of the sugar residues within the trimer. The domain III amino acids interacting with the glycan are also marked with green stars in the alignment of Fig 1D. C) Close up view of the polar contacts of conserved residues from the N tail. Hydrogen bonds are indicated as dotted lines, including those between main chain atoms, in which case the interacting atoms are not drawn but only the ribbon, for clarity. D-E) Mutation of conserved N tail residues render Gc non-functional for fusion. D) Fusion activity of cells expressing Gn and N tail mutants of Andes virus Gc at neutral or acid pH. Syncytia formation was quantified by counting cells and nuclei using three-color fluorescence microscopy (S6 Fig) and results from at least n = 2 experiments were averaged. E) Entry of Vero E6 by SIV particles pseudotyped with Andes virus spikes (Gn/Gc pp) with wild type Gn and Gc wild type or the indicated N tail mutant. Reporter gene (GFP) expressing cells were quantified by cell cytometry (S7 Fig). F-G) trimer formation and stability of selected N tail mutants of Andes virus Gc. F) Acid-induced trimer formation of wild type or mutant Gc. Sucrose sedimentation of Andes virus VLPs after treatment at the indicated pH and subsequent extraction by Triton X-100. The presence of Gc in different fraction was detected by western blot analysis and the molecular mass of each fraction determined by a molecular marker. G) Trimer stability of wild type and mutant Andes virus Gc assayed by trypsin. VLPs including Gn and wild type or mutant Gc were treated at the indicated pH for 30 min, back-neutralized, and incubated with trypsin for 30 min. Gc resistance to trypsin was assessed by western blot analysis and results were quantified by densitometry from n = 3 independent experiments. As a control, mutation of residues in the membrane interaction region, which are not active in fusion (see below, Fig 5) but are not involved in trimer contacts (Y88A and F250A), behave like wild type in this assay. The statistical evaluation of each data point was performed in relation to the wild type Gc treated at pH 5.5. ***, P < 0.00025; **, P < 0.0025; *, P < 0.025; ns, not significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g004

(residues 14–19 in the post-fusion form) to C₀ of the neighboring subunit in the trimer (Fig 2F), thereby augmenting the inner sheet and providing an extensive pattern of inter-subunit main chain hydrogen bonds. Other inter-chain interactions between strictly conserved residues involving the Gc N tail include hydrogen bonds and salt bridges between His14 and Asp174 in β-strand G₀ and between Asp11 and His399 in domain III, as well as Trp9 packing against Pro321 and disulfide 9 (Cys322-Cys352) (Fig 4C), also in domain III. The domain I/III linker (residues 310–321) runs along the A₀ strand, making several antiparallel β-sheet interactions with it (Fig 4C). At the very N-terminal end, residues 1 through 5 (which are variable in sequence across the hantaviruses, Fig 1D) project into solvent and are disordered.

As the N tail is not present in the other class II proteins, but in hantaviruses a number of its residues are strictly conserved (Fig 1D) and are seen in the structure to make a network of interactions, we turned to the Andes virus system to functionally test some of these residues. We chose to substitute Asp11, Thr12 and His14 by alanine, and also His14 by tyrosine to see if a bigger side chain could functionally substitute for histidine. These mutants were all expressed correctly and reached the cell surface (S5 Fig), but syncytium formation and cell entry by the corresponding pseudotyped SIV particles was abrogated (Fig 4D and 4E). In order to further explore whether trimerisation of the mutants is impaired, we made virion-like particles (VLPs) of Andes virus [60] harboring the mutations D11A and H14Y in Gc. We harvested VLPs from cells transfected with wild type Gn/Gc or with wild type Gn and the mutant Gc, which secreted VLPs at similar levels (S5 Fig). We analyzed the VLPs after low pH treatment followed by detergent solubilization for Gc trimer formation by sedimentation on a sucrose gradient. The amount of mutant Gc trimer formation was similar to the wild type VLPs (Fig 4F), indicating that trimerization is not impaired.
We therefore analyzed the stability of the resulting acid-induced mutant Gc trimers by trypsin digestion of the VLPs. We observed that, contrary to wild type Gc, the low pH treated D11A and H14Y mutants were not resistant to proteolytic degradation (Fig 4G). In parallel, we found that the alanine substitution of Tyr88, Trp115 or Phe250, which are located at the tip of Gc domain II and which are also impaired in fusion (see below) but for which the side chains are not involved in inter-protomer contacts in the trimer, resulted in trypsin-resistant trimers as wild type Gc, serving as a positive control. These data indicate that the inter-subunit interactions of the Gc N tail are important to confer sufficient stability of the Gc post-fusion trimer in order to be fusion active.

## The membrane interacting region of the Gc trimer

The hantavirus Gc *ij* loop is longer than the corresponding loop in standard class II fusion proteins, and it places Phe250 at the tip of the trimer, along with Trp115 and Pro123 in the *cd* loop and Tyr88 in the *bc* loop (Fig 5A). To understand whether these residues are involved in the functional targeting of the host cell membrane, we performed alanine substitutions and examined the corresponding mutants in the context of Andes hantavirus with the tools described above. We examined these mutants alongside the W115A mutant characterized previously [18]. As W115A, the Y88A, P123A and F250A mutants were properly expressed and the corresponding Gn/Gc complexes trafficked to the plasma membrane of transfected cells (S5 Fig).

Except for the P123A mutant, which behaved as wild type and served a positive control, the Y88A and F250A mutants were impaired in syncytia formation, and did not support entry of the pseudotyped particles into cells (Fig 5E and 5F), similar to the previous results with the W115A mutant. We also analyzed the interaction of VLPs generated with the same mutants with fluorescently labeled liposomes using a sucrose gradient. When VLPs and liposomes incubated at pH 7 were run on the gradient, the liposomes were found by fluorescence floating on top of the gradient, while Gc was recovered from the bottom fractions (Fig 5G). But when the VLPs were incubated with liposomes at pH 5.5, each of the single mutants was recovered in the top fractions of the gradient, as was wild type (Fig 5G), indicating that substitution by alanine of a single residue at the tip of domain II was not sufficient to abolish the interaction with membranes necessary to float with the liposomes.

We also tested VLPs containing double mutations (which produced VLPs in similar yields as wild type, S5 Fig): whereas Y88A/W115A still partially floated with the liposomes, W115A/F250A remained in the bottom fractions at acidic pH. But neither of them mediated low pH-induced syncytia formation, as expected from the single substitution mutants (Fig 5E). In order to identify the actual step at which substitution of W115A and F250A block the membrane fusion process, we tested whether these single or double mutants still underwent acid-induced Gc trimerization, since it was shown previously that Gc can trimerize in the absence of membrane insertion [46]. As expected, sedimentation in a sucrose gradient of acid-treated VLPs including Gc mutants W115A and W115A/F250A revealed that, independently of the membrane inserting activity, these mutants underwent homotrimerization as did wild type Gc (Fig 5H). This result is in line with the structure of the post-fusion trimer, in which the side chains of these residues are not involved in trimer contacts but are exposed at the membrane-interacting side of the trimer (Fig 5A).

To further investigate the stage at which fusion is blocked with these mutants, we incubated pyrene-labeled VLPs [61] bearing wild type Gc or the mutants with liposomes, in order to monitor lipid mixing. Acidification resulted in decrease of the fluorescence of the pyrene excimer within 20 sec in the case of wild type Gc, reflecting lipid mixing (Fig 5I) during fusion. In contrast, the VLPs carrying the Gc double mutant W115A/F250A, which do not insert into
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>Hantavirus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>Flavivirus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>Phlebovirus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 5. The Gc fusion loops.** A) Surface representation of the tip of HNTV domain II viewed down the three-fold axis from the membrane. Two of the subunits are shown in solid surface representation and the third was rendered semi-transparent to visualize the polypeptide chain and selected side chains. B) Orthogonal view of one protomer, with the same residues and loops</figcaption></figure>
labeled. C) For comparison, the same representation of flavivirus E (Dengue 2, 1OK8; [53]) and D) phlebovirus Gc (RVFV, 4HJ1; [20]) fusion loop region. Note that in hantavirus Gc, the *ij* loop is longer and projects Phe250 to the membrane, whereas in flaviviruses and phleboviruses, it is not the case (the same holds true for alphaviruses, not depicted here). Similarly, the *bc* loop projects Tyr88 towards the membrane. E) Fusion activity of cells expressing Andes virus wild type Gn and wild type or mutant Gc at neutral or acid pH. Syncytia formation was quantified by counting cells and nuclei using three-color fluorescence microscopy (S6 Fig) and results from at least *n* = 2 experiments were averaged. F) Entry into Vero E6 cells viral particles pseudotyped with Andes virus spikes with wild type Gn and wild type or indicated mutant Gc (Gn/Gc pp; as in Figs 3D and 4E; see the S7 Fig for cell cytometry quantification of reporter GFP production). G) Liposome co-flotation assay to visualize acid-induced membrane interaction of wild type and mutant Andes virus VLPs. VLPs were incubated with liposomes labeled with a fluorescent dye (DPH, see Materials and Methods) at pH 7.4 or 5.5. Fractions of the step gradient sedimentation were examined for the presence of Gc by western blot and liposomes by fluorescence. H) Trimer formation by wild type and mutant Gc. Sucrose sedimentation of VLPs incubated at pH 7.4 or 5.5 and detection of Gc by western blot analysis. I) Acid-induced lipid mixing kinetics with liposomes of VLPs including Gn and wild type or mutant Gc. The decrease of pyrene-excimer fluorescence intensity was detected upon low pH incubation of pyrene-labeled VLPs with liposomes as a function of time. Results are representative for at least *n* = 2 independent experiments.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g005

target membranes as monitored by liposome flotation displayed no signal for lipid mixing, cor-
roborating the assay (Fig 5I). When we ran this experiment with VLPs containing the Gc fusion
inactive single substitution mutants Y88A, W115A or F250A, we could still detect lipid mixing
upon low pH incubation with the liposomes (Fig 5I), indicating that these mutants led to an
incomplete fusion process, most likely arrested at the hemifusion stage, as they do not induce
full fusion (Fig 5E and 5F). Indeed, if only the labeled lipids of the outer leaflet become diluted
during hemifusion, then the expectation is to obtain a lower lipid mixing signal, as observed–,
provided that there is no lipid flipping from inner to outer leaflets of the membrane during the
time frame of the experiment. The fact that the mutants did not induce full fusion (Fig 5E and
5F) indicates that the observed lipid mixing was due to hemifusion with negligible lipid flipping
under the conditions of the experiment.

These results therefore indicate that the Gc single mutants do not insert stably enough into the
membrane to induce full fusion, but they still can induce lipid mixing. We conclude from these
results that the longer *ij* loop observed in hantavirus Gc, as well as the *bc* loop with Tyr88 project-
ing into the membrane, have functional implications in engaging the target membrane such that
full fusion can proceed. In contrast to the arbovirus class II proteins, which appear to have a single
fusion loop–the *cd* loop–in hantaviruses the membrane interacting surface is multipartite.

Conservation of the hantavirus Gc disulfide bonds pattern across the
*Bunyaviridae*

Amino acid sequence alignment of hantavirus Gc with its counterparts from viruses of the various genera of the *Bunyaviridae* family allowed the identification of a motif that systematically identifies Gc glycoproteins from four out of the five genera, leaving out the phleboviruses. The alignment used to extract this motif is displayed in Fig 6, and includes four of the disulfide bonds that stabilize the tip of domain II as well as one of the disulfides in domain I (the one staking together β-strands E₀ and F₀). This alignment allows the prediction of the connectivity of the additional cysteines in the other genera (S8 Fig).

Two features appear important: as hantavirus Gc, the other genera also have N-terminal extensions, which are quite large (as in orthobunyavirus Gc), and lack the N-terminal disulfide bond stapling β-strand A₀ and C₀ as in the other class II fusion proteins featuring an A₀ strand (i.e., phlebovirus Gc, flavivirus E and the cellular fusion protein EFF-1). Such a disulfide bond would be incompatible with the rearrangements of strand A₀ that are necessary to have a swapped domain III in the post-fusion form, and one prediction therefore is that the phlebovirus Gc will have the “standard” class II quaternary arrangement, whereas in all the other genera the post-fusion form of Gc is likely to feature a swapped domain III.
<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 6.** A common tertiary structure motif in Gc from four bunyavirus genera. A) Multiple Gc amino acid sequence alignment from one representative each of the *Hantavirus* (HNTV, P08668.1), *Tospovirus* (TSWV, NP_049359.1), *Orthobunyavirus* (BUNV, NP_047212.1), and *Nairovirus* (CCHFV, AAK52743.1) genera. The secondary structural elements of Hantaan virus Gc are shown in the upper line (as in Fig 1D), the hantavirus disulfide bonds are labeled, and cysteines not conserved across genera are in an orange background. The residues exposed at the membrane-interacting end of domain II in hantavirus Gc are marked with a blue star under the alignment. The four boxes mark clusters of high</figcaption></figure>
conservation, which are very informative when analyzed by pairs, *Hanta-Nairovirus* and *Tospo-Orthobunyavirus* genera, which are closer to each other than to the others (see the S8 Fig). A cyan background within boxes 2 and 4 (marked also by a small black arrow underneath) highlights amino acids with complementary electrostatic charges predicted to come into contact at the membrane interacting surface, between disulfides 4 and 5, which connect *cd* and *ij* loops. B) The motif obtained from the alignment in A (top line) was run in Prosite to scan the SwissProt and trEMBL databases, and the taxonomic distribution of the matched entries are provided in the colored pie chart. The 1057 entries found encompass all of the known viruses within the four genera, plus some that are “unclassified” by the server. Searching the literature shows that the 7 viruses given as “unclassified *Bunyaviridae***” have been assigned to one of the genera (three orthobunyaviruses: Buffalo Creek, Mapputa and Marpik viruses [62]; one tospovirus [63]; and three nairoviruses: Sanxia Water Strider, Shayang Spider and Xinzhou Spider viruses [64]. The two “unclassified ssRNA negative-polarity viruses” are Wuhan Louse Fly virus and Wuhan insect virus 2, which were reported in a recent metagenomic analysis [64] and remain unclassified.

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005813.g006

Similarly, the *ij* loop is also longer in the *Nairovirus*, *Orthobunyavirus* and *Tospovirus* genera than in the standard class II proteins, and is likely to contribute to the membrane interacting surface (see Fig 5A, 5B and 5C). In contrast, the carboxylate—carboxylic acid hydrogen bond in strand *c*, which structures the tip of domain II, appears as a hantavirus-specific feature, as these residues are not conserved across these bunyavirus genera.

## Discussion

Membrane fusion is a critical step in entry for any enveloped virus, and in hantaviruses it is mediated by the highly conserved glycoprotein Gc. Because of this conservation, the features identified in the structures of Hantaan virus Gc in its pre- and post-fusion forms can be applied to all members of the *Hantavirus* genus. We have taken advantage of this conservation to use the molecular tools developed to test the glycoproteins of Andes virus for function. By combining structural and functional data, one important aspect that we have discovered is the multi-partite nature of the membrane interaction surface of hantavirus Gc as well as the key role played by the N tail for fusion. These results set hantavirus Gc—and by extension, also Gc from the three more closely related genera in the *Bunyaviridae* family, see below—apart from the more standard class II fusion proteins observed in the flaviviruses and phleboviruses. The latter have an A₀ strand (contrary to alphavirus E1, which lacks strand A₀) but it is locked by a disulfide bond to the C₀ strand of the same polypeptide chain, prohibiting a conformational rearrangement similar to the domain III swap, which is accompanied by the N tail (Fig 2F).

The various loops interacting with the target membrane in hantavirus Gc are reminiscent of the bi-partite membrane contacting region of class III fusion proteins [65], with two fusion loops—which may also require elements from the C-terminal, membrane proximal region to engage the target membranes and induce full fusion. A more extensive membrane binding region was previously observed in the class II fusion protein E1 of rubella virus, which features an insertion within the *cd* loop to make two short α-helices and an additional β-strand (*c*') running parallel to strand *c*, such that the *bdc* β-sheet at the tip of domain II becomes a four-stranded *bdcc*' β-sheet [36]. This results in two fusion loops, *cc*' and *c*d, projecting toward the target membrane, and a Ca²⁺ site in between the two loops that is essential for function [66]. An analogous role appears to be played by Asn118 in hantavirus Gc, by bridging two loops in the membrane interacting region (Fig 2E). A further similarity with the rubella virus post-fusion E1 trimer is the swapped domain III, although in E1 there is neither A₀ strand nor N tail to accompany this conformational change, and the transition is not yet understood in the absence of a structure of E1 in its pre-fusion form.

The mechanistic implications derived from the structures of the hantavirus Gc can be extended to other bunyaviruses, further broadening the scope of this work. Indeed, our comparison of hantavirus Gc with its counterparts of the other genera indicates that the hantavirus and nairovirus Gc proteins are closer to each other than they are to Gc from other
bunyaviruses, and that Asn118, which plays a key structuring role within the *cd* loop and the interaction with the *ij* loop (Fig 2E) is conserved across the two genera (Fig 6 and S8 Fig). We also note the conservation in nairoviruses of Trp9 and His14 of the N tail, which are involved in the network of interactions illustrated in Fig 4C, supporting the notion that a similar domain III swap may occur in nairoviruses as well. As nairoviruses require the additional cleavage of preGc into mature Gc at the N-terminal end, at an “RKPL” site corresponding to a non-standard subtilase SKI-1 like protease [67], it is possible that the cleavage is necessary to release the N tail such that the fusogenic conformational change can take place (the RKPL sequence is about 40 residues upstream the first residue displayed in the alignment of the S8A Fig).

The sequence conservation pattern further shows that orthobunyavirus and tospovirus Gc proteins are also closer to each other than they are to the others (S8B Fig), and feature an insertion in the *ij* loop, which becomes even longer (Fig 6). The amino acid alignment indicates that a dibasic motif downstream the disulphide 4 in the *ij* loop (highlighted in a cyan background in Fig 6) will face an acidic “EE” motif in the *cd* loop (highlighted in the same Figure) at the location of Asn118 in hanta- and nairoviruses, suggesting that a different set of polar/electrostatic interactions may replace the network formed by Asn118 at the tip of domain II in Gc of these two genera.

Our results on hantavirus Gc therefore reveal a number of unanticipated aspects of the bunyaviruses in general. In particular, they introduce an evolutionary hierarchy for the five genera based on the Gc gene, which appear to display a deep branching site between phleboviruses and the others, the latter then splitting into two branches each, giving rise to hantaviruses and nairoviruses on the one hand, and to orthobunyaviruses and tospoviruses on the other, with mechanistic similarities for the membrane fusion process accompanying this diversification. We thus propose to group these fusion proteins as a sub-class within class II, having by specificity the fact of presenting a multipartite membrane targeting region, together with an N tail involved in the fusogenic conformational rearrangement.

Additional structure-function studies on the Gc orthologs from each of these branches will further nail down the practical implications of the identified evolutionary trends, opening the possibility of unveiling common vulnerability sites on Gc to be targeted by broad-spectrum anti-bunyavirus compounds to help treat patients against these deadly pathogens.

# Materials and Methods

## Protein expression and purification

In order to obtain milligrams amount of soluble Hantaan virus Gc, we inserted a synthetic gene codon-optimized for expression in *Drosophila* cells, into a modified pMT/BiP plasmid (Invitrogen). This initial construct, termed pMT-Gn/rGc, included the full length Gn followed by the Gc ectodomain, i.e. lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmatic domains. To help in the purification we included two strep-tag sequences separated by a (GGGS)₃ linker and preceded by an enterokinase cleave site. As this construct produced only small amounts of soluble rGc, most likely because it is retained within the cells, either by Gn and/or because the fusion loop of Gc interacts with cellular membranes, we removed Gn from the construct to make pMT-rGc. As mentioned in the main text, we also introduced the W115H mutation in this plasmid (pMT-rGc-W115H). Similarly, scFv A5, identified as binding to rGc by screening the Griffin library using helper phage KM13 [68], was cloned into the modified pMT/BiP plasmid followed by a double strep-tag (pMT-scFvA5). These plasmids were used separately to obtain stable transfectants of Drosophila S2 cells together with the pCoPuro plasmid (ratio 1:20) for puromycin selection. The stable cell lines were selected and maintained in serum-free Insect-Xpress medium containing 7 µg/ml puromycin. Cultures of 1–3 liters were grown in spinner
flasks in Insect-Xpress medium supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics to about 1 x 10⁷ cells/mL, and the protein expression was induced with 4 µM CdCl₂. After 5 days, the S2 media supernatant was concentrated to 40 ml and supplemented with 10 µg/mL avidin and 0.1M Tris-HCl pH 8.0, centrifuged 30 minutes at 20,000 g and purified by strep-tactin affinity chromatography and gel filtration. The yields were about 5–10 mg/L for rGc and rGc-W115H and 10–15 mg/L for scFv A5.

For crystallization, rGc was incubated on ice for 30 minutes with a 1.2 molar excess of scFv A5 with the pH adjusted to 8.5 by adding TrisHCl pH 8.5 to a final concentration of 100 mM. The mixture was digested with trypsin (mass ratio of 1:100), for 1 hour at 37°C, stopping the reaction by adding 1 mM of PMSF and cooling on ice. The digest was loaded to a gel filtration Superdex 75 16/60 column in 10 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and the fractions of the peak corresponding to the complex were pooled and concentrated in the same buffer for crystallization trials.

The rGc-W115H construct was used to obtain the post-fusion form without adding detergent, as explained in the main text. Digestion with enterokinase (New England Biolabs) after Strep-tactin affinity purification to remove the Strep-tag for crystallization showed an immediate cleavage but overtime a second, shorter resistant fragment accumulated overnight at 4°C. Only this second enterokinase resistant fragment, in which rGc appeared to lose the stem region, resulted in crystals. Inspection of the stem region indeed indicates several lysine residues where enterokinase could cleave. In the final protocol, the enterokinase treatment was allowed to proceed overnight at 4°C, and then the digest was submitted to gel filtration on a Superdex 200 16/60 column in 10 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. The protein was then buffer exchanged and concentrated in 20 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.1, 150 mM NaCl, using a Vivaspin centricron, to a final concentration of 5–10 mg/ml.

## Crystallization and structure determination

We determined the structure of the rGc/scFv A5 complex by a combination of molecular replacement (MR) and single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD). Native crystals were grown in 60 mM Na-HEPES pH 7.5, 40 mM hexamine cobalt chloride salt, 13.5% (w/v) PEG 4K, 7.4% (v/v) 2-propanol, and 1% (v/v) glycerol and cryo-protected in the same solution supplemented with 22% (v/v) PEG 400. The crystals used for the heavy atom derivative were grown in presence of 60 mM Na-HEPES pH 7.5, 20 mM hexamine cobalt chloride salt, 13% (w/v) PEG 4K, 7.4% (v/v) 2-propanol, and 1% (v/v) glycerol. They were subsequently soaked for 18h in mother liquor supplemented with 2 mM samarium and cryo-cooled using 22% (v/v) PEG 400 as cryo-protectant before plunging into liquid nitrogen. In order to optimize the anomalous signal we collected a highly redundant dataset (S1 Table), merging three independent datasets collected from a single crystal using a kappa goniometer (kappa = 10°, 0°, -10°) using an “inverse beam” strategy. The final SAD dataset could be processed up to a resolution of 3.65 Å and showed a usable (CCanom > 0.3) anomalous signal up to 4.5 Å.

To determine the phases, we first modelled an scFvA5 molecule using the Rosetta Antibody3 program [69] through the ROSIE interface [70]. We then used the resulting model as MR template for PHASER [71] with the native dataset at 3 Å resolution. We obtained a single solution with a translation function Z-score of 7.4 in which the scFv molecules are packed together back to back around a two-fold axis, with the CDR loops exposed to solvent, leaving enough space to accommodate one Gc molecule. The initial MR phases were used to identify a set of heavy atom sites in the Sm-SAD dataset using the HySS (Hybrid Substructure Search) module of the PHENIX package [72], and we used them to calculate SAD phases with PHASER. The combined MR and SAD phases were improved by density modification using RESOLVE [73]. All
these steps were done automatically using the AutoSol wizard [74] in PHENIX. The final map was of enough quality to start manual model building, and the extended and corrected model was used as input model in a new MR-SAD cycle. With this iterative procedure we built a model that comprises full domains I and III, and a large part of domain II. We used domains I and III as MR templates to determine the structure of the rGc-W115H trimer at 1.6 Å resolution and build a complete model using this dataset. We then used the structure of the high-resolution post-fusion form as a guide to finish the model building and to generate restraints for refinement of the complex rGc/scFvA5.

The crystals of the rGc-W105H trimer were grown in 100 mM Na-MES pH 6.5, 10.8% (w/v) PEG 8K, and 7% (v/v) glycerol and were cryo-protected in the same solution supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol. As described above, the structure was solved by MR using the partial models of domains I and III from the rGc/scFvA5 crystals. We also identified conditions of rGc-W105H trimer crystal growth in the presence of 500 mM KCl, which showed no density for the fusion loop region. We then carried out a detailed study of the effect of KCl by growing crystals of rGc-W105H in the presence of increasing concentrations of KCl. We collected datasets in the presence of 100 mM KCl, (resolution 1.8 Å), 200 mM KCl (1.7 Å), 300 mM KCl (1.6 Å), 500 mM (1.5 Å), and 600 mM KCl (1.4 Å), where the values in parentheses are the resolution limits in each case. The structures of these crystals were determined by molecular replacement using as a model rGc-W105H. We refined the structures using phenix.refine and the final model validated with Molprobity [75] and CheckMyMetal [76]. The statistics of all crystals and refinement is provided in the S1 Table.

## Liposome preparation

Liposomes were prepared fresh each time by the freeze-thaw and extrusion method [77]. DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), DOPE (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine), sphingomyelin (from bovine brain), cholesterol (from ovine wool), PC (phosphocholine, from egg yolk) and PE (phosphoethanolamine, prepared from egg phosphatidylcholine by transphosphatidylation) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. Type 1, 2, 3 and 4 liposomes were made using DOPC alone, DOPC/cholesterol (1/1), DOPC/DOPE/sphingomyelin/cholesterol (1/1/1/3) and PC/PE/sphingomyelin/cholesterol (1/1/1/1.5), respectively.

## Electron microscopy experiments

Samples of rGc were negatively stained with phosphotungstic acid and screened with a Tecnai G2 Spirit Biotwin microscope 5 (FEI, USA) operating at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. To obtain the rGc/liposomes pictures, 200 ng of rGc were added to 10 ul of a solution of 1 mM of type 3 liposomes in 20 mM MES pH 5.5, 150 mM NaCl (MN 5.5). After 1 minute incubation at room temperature, the sample was spotted onto carbon coated glow discharged grids, contrasted with 2% phosphotungstic acid and screened in a Tecnai G2 Spirit Biotwin microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Images were recorded using a 4Kx4K camera Eagle (FEI, USA) and the TIA software (FEI, USA).

## Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) assays

All experiments were performed on a Biacore T200 instrument (GEHealthcare) equilibrated at 25°C in two different running buffers: PBS pH 7.4, and MN pH 5.5 (20 mM MES pH 5.5, 150 mM NaCl).

**Inhibition of the interaction of rGc with liposomes by scFv A5.** Liposomes of different concentrations (500 µM in PBS) were captured on the four flow cells of an L1 sensor chip (GE Healthcare) for 5 minutes at a flow rate of 5 µl/min, reaching a density of 7500–8000 resonance
units (RU). The surface was washed with 20 mM NaOH for 1 minute and saturated with 0.2 mg/ml of BSA for 5 minutes. rGc (500 nM) alone or mixed with scFv A5 or the control scFv B (200, 1000, and 5000 nM) was then injected for 1 minute at 50 µl/min over the liposome surface. Blank injections of scFvs alone or PBS were performed in parallel. Finally, the surfaces were regenerated with two 2-minutes injections of 20 mM CHAPS and one 1-minute injection of 0.1% SDS.

**Interaction of Gc with scFv A5 and B.** The scFvs were covalently immobilized by amine coupling on two flow cells of a CMD200m sensor chip (Xantec), reaching densities of 900 RU for A5 and 550 RU for B. rGc (39–5000 nM) was injected over the scFv surfaces for 3 minutes at 50 µl/min followed by 5 minutes of dissociation in each of the two running buffers (PBS and MN 5.5). Surfaces were regenerated with a 30 seconds injection of 0.01% SDS. Signals measured on the scFv B surface were used as references and subtracted from those measured on the scFv A5 surface. The association/dissociation profiles were analysed using the Bioevaluation software yielding $k_{on}$, $k_{off}$ and $K_D$ values.

## Design of Gc mutants and expression in transfected cells

We used the expression plasmid pI.18/GPC for the expression of the full length GPC coding region (encompassing both Gn and Gc in the M genomic segment) of Andes virus strain CHI-7913 [56]. Site-directed mutations were generated by DNA synthesis and sub-cloning into pI.18/GPC using intrinsic restriction sites. For expression, 293FT cells (Invitrogen) ($3.6 \times 10^6$) grown in 100 mm plates were calcium-transfected with 8–20 µg of DNA and 48 h later, cell surface proteins were labelled with biotin in order to separate the biotinylated (surface proteins) from non-biotinylated (intracellular proteins) fractions using a cell surface protein isolation kit (Pierce). For protein detection by western blot, primary antibodies anti-Gc monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2H4/F6 [78] or anti-β-actin MAb (Sigma) were used at 1:2,500 and subsequently detected with an anti-mouse immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 1:5,000 and a chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal WestPico, Pierce).

## Cell-cell fusion experiments

This assay was performed as previously described [18]. Briefly, Vero E6 cells (ATCC) seeded into 16 well chamber slides were transfected with the pI.18/GPC wt or the different mutant constructs using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The DNA amounts were adjusted to obtain similar levels of Gc at the cell surface; the cells were accordingly transfected with plasmid DNA ranging between 0.5–1.5 µg. 48 h later, the cells were incubated in E-MEM (pH 5.5) at 37°C for 5 min, subsequently washed, and the incubation continued for 3 h at 37°C in E-MEM (pH 7.2). The cell cytoplasm was then stained for one hour with 1 µM of CellTracker CMFDA (Molecular Probes) and cells were next fixed for 20 min with 4% paraformaldehyde. For immunofluorescence labelling, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and Gc labelled using the MAb 2H4/F6 1:500 and secondary antibody anti-mouse immunoglobulin conjugated to Alexa555 1:500 (Invitrogen). Finally, nuclei were stained for 5 min with DAPI 1 ng/µL and samples examined under a fluorescence microscope (BMAX51, Olympus). The fusion index of Gc-expressing cells was calculated using the formula: $1 - [number of cells/number of nuclei]$. Approximately 200 nuclei per field were counted (20X magnification) and five fields used to calculate the fusion index for each sample ($n = 2$) of two independent experiments.

## Glycoprotein assembly into VLPs

VLPs were harvested from supernatants of 293FT cells transfected with the pI.18/GPC wt or the different mutant constructs at 48 h post-transfection as previously established [60].
Subsequently, VLPs were concentrated by ultracentrifugation for one hour at 135,000 g and detected by reducing SDS PAGE and western blot using anti-Gc MAb as described above. The presence of VLPs was further corroborated by negative-stain electron microscopy using phosphotungstic acid 2% pH 7.4 (FEI Tecnai 12 Transmission Electron Microscope, Philips).

## Production of pseudotyped SIV vectors and transduction

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vectors pseudotyped with ANDV Gn and wild type or mutant Gc were prepared as previously described [56]. Briefly, 293FT were transfected with the following plasmids: pSIV3+ [79], pGAE1.0 [80] (kindly provided by Jean-Luc Darlix, INSERM, ENS-Lyon, France) and pI.18/GPC wild type or the different mutant constructs. At 72 h post-transfection, pseudotyped vectors released into the supernatant were harvested, concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 135,000 g and used to transduce Vero E6 cells (ATCC, CR-1586). 72 h post-inoculation, cells were trypsinized and GFP expression assessed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton Dickinson). Transduction titers were calculated using the percentage of GFP positive cells, counting at least 10,000 cells of each condition.

## Liposome-coflotation experiments

The coflotation of viral particles with liposomes was performed as previously established [46]. Briefly, VLPs or GPC-pseudotyped SIV vectors prepared from wild type or mutant pI.18/GPC construct were incubated with 200 mM 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH)-labelled liposomes (Type 4) for 30 min at pH 7.4 or 5.5. The VLP-liposome mixture was then added to the bottom and adjusted to 25% (w/v) sucrose. Additional sucrose steps of 15% and 5% were then over-layered. After centrifugation for 2 h at 300,000 g, liposomes were detected by the fluorescence emission of DPH (λex = 230 nm; λem = 320 nm) and VLPs by western blot using anti-Gc MAb 2H4/F6.

## Gc homotrimerization experiments

Acid-induced Gc homotrimerization was tested as established before [46]. VLPs or GPC-pseudotyped SIV vectors prepared from wt or mutant pI.18/GPC constructs were incubated for 30 min at 37°C at the indicated pHs to allow multimerization changes. Next, Triton X-100 1% (v/v) was added to allow the extraction of the membrane glycoproteins from the viral particle. The extracted glycoproteins were then added to the top of a sucrose gradient (7–15%; w/v) and centrifuged at 150,000 g for 16 h. Finally, fractions were collected and the presence of Gc was analyzed by western blot using MAbs anti-Gc 2H4/F6.

## Trypsin resistance

The stability of the Gc homotrimer was studied by analyzing its resistance to trypsin digestion as determined before [46]. VLPs were incubated at pH 5.5 for 30 min at 37°C to allow Gc multimerization changes or pH 7.4 as a digestion control. Next, the VLPs were digested with 500 µg/ml of TCPK trypsin (Sigma) for 30 min, stopping the reaction by the addition of sample buffer and heating to 95°C for 10 min. The extent of Gc digestion was determined by western blot, using an anti-Gc MAb. The trypsin resistance of wild type and mutant Gc was quantified by dividing the densitometry values of the digested Gc signal by the undigested Gc assay input control for each mutant, using the Fiji software [81]. The average value and standard deviation of 3 experiments was calculated and a Student's t test was performed for statistical evaluation:
***, P < 0.00025; **, P < 0.0025; *, P < 0.025.
## Lipid mixing assay

For the lipid mixing assay VLPs were metabolically pyrene-labeled by supplementing the producing cell's media with 25 µg/ml of 1-pyrenehexadecanoic acid (Molecular Probes). Labeled VLPs were mixed with liposomes and lipid mixing was monitored by the decrease in pyrene excimer fluorescence generated by the dilution of the pyrene-labeled phospholipids with the unlabeled phospholipids in the liposome membrane in a continuously stirred fluorimeter cuvette at 37°C. Fluorescence was recorded continuously at 480 nm using a Varian Eclypse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies) at an excitation wavelength of 343 nm using a 10-nm slit width for excitation and emission. After a stable base line was established, the pH of the solution was lowered to 5.5 for reaction initiation (time = 0). The base line excimer value was defined as 0% lipid mixing and the maximal extent of excimer dilution was defined by the addition of detergent Triton X-100 after lipid mixing of each condition concluded.

## Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The coordinate files of the structures described in this manuscript have been submitted to the Protein Data Bank, and the corresponding accession codes are listed in the S1 Table.

## Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Recombinant Gc is a monomer and makes a 1:1 complex with scFv A5. A) Size exclusion chromatography profile of Gc at neutral (black) and acidic pH (green) and multi-angle static light scattering (MALS) molecular mass determination of each peak, showing that Gc is a monomer in both cases, although at neutral pH the Stokes radius is larger. B) Size exclusion profile of scFv A5 (magenta), Gc (green), and a mixture of Gc with an excess of scFvA5 (blue line). The experiments here were done in Tris pH 8. scFv A5 alone (magenta curve) elutes as a double peak with corresponding molecular mass difference of 3 kDa, which we interpreted to be due to spontaneous degradation and loss of the C-terminal purification tag. Gc runs as a single monomer and the mixture of Gc with an excess of scFvA5 produces a shift of the Gc peak of about 16 kDa. Very likely this shift is lower than the expected 24 kDa because of the heterogeneity of the peak, which clearly overlaps with the uncomplexed Gc peak. C and D) SPR sensorgrams showing the interaction between Gc and scFv A5 at neutral (C) and acid pH (D). The antibody was immobilized on the chip and the measurements were done by flawing Gc at concentrations of 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, 312, 156, 78, and 39 nM. (JPG)

S2 Fig. rGc binds to cholesterol containing liposomes, and binding is inhibited by scFv A5. A) The rows correspond to liposomes of different compositions, as indicated in the right, which were immobilized on an L1 chip. 500 nM of Gc alone (red line) or in combination with increasing amounts (green, blue, and cyan curves) of scFv A5 (first and third column) or a control scFv (scFv “B”, second and fourth columns) were injected at pH 5.5 (first and second columns) and 7.4 (third and fourth column), as indicated in the top line, using as running buffer PBS (pH 7.4) or buffer MN (pH 5.5, see Methods for buffer composition). B) Model of three scFvs A5 interacting with a Gc trimer, showing that the binding mode is compatible with trimer formation but not with trimer insertion into membranes. (JPG)

S3 Fig. Biochemical properties mapped to the Gc surface. Shown are the post-fusion trimer and one of its subunits (i.e., the two foreground subunits were omitted, leaving only the one in
the back, to show the buried surface within the trimer). The trimer interface is outlined in green. A) Exposed (left) and buried (right) conserved patches (white). B) Exposed (left) and buried (right) hydrophobic patches (white) and C) electrostatic surface potential. The three-fold axis is indicated in red in all the panels.

(JPG)

**S4 Fig. The rGc trimer crystallized in the presence of increasing KCl concentrations.** The upper panels show the structures of one Gc protomer extracted from the post-fusion trimer colored according to the B-factor when crystallized at the indicated KCl concentration. We used the “cartoon putty” option in Pymol [82], in which the radius of the cartoon is proportional to the B factor, to highlight the most mobile regions. The mobility of the fusion loop increases until its electron density is lost in the structure at 300 mM KCl, with a concomitant increase in the resolution to which the crystals diffract. The middle and lower panels compare the polar network of interactions in the protein crystallized at different KCl concentrations to that in the absence of KCl. A curved red arrow in the right-hand panel, middle row, follows the movement of the Glu106 side chain, represented in thicker sticks in this panel, which is concomitant with disordering of the tip. The lower-right panel recapitulates the observed movement of Tyr105 and Glu106 by superposing all the previous panels (See S4 Movie).

(JPG)

**S5 Fig. Characterization of expression yields and cell localization of Andes virus Gc mutants.** Western blot analysis using anti-Gc or anti-β-actin MAbs of different fractions obtained from 293FT cells expressing Gn and wild type or mutant Gc after surface biotinylation. The fractions correspond to the non-biotinylated fraction (intracellular proteins), the biotinylated fraction (surface proteins), or the concentrated supernatant. “Unrelated” indicates the expression of unrelated Gc mutants used as control.

(JPG)

**S6 Fig. Syncytia formation by wild and mutant Gc.** Inmunofluorescence images of Vero E6 cells expressing Gn and wild type or mutant Gc after treatment at pH 5.5. The cell cytoplasm was labelled with 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA; green fluorescence), nuclei with DAPI (blue fluorescence) and Gc was detected with anti-Gc antibody (Alexa555; red fluorescence). Cells from a partial microscopy field are shown from a representative experiment. Arrow heads indicate syncytia. (200 x magnification).

(JPG)

**S7 Fig. Transduction of Vero E6 cells by particles pseudotyped with Gn and wild type or mutant Gc.** Flow cytometry gates were set for cells transduced with Mock particles (empty pI.18 vector) and the percentages shown correspond to GFP-positive cells. Data from a representative experiment are shown.

(JPG)

**S8 Fig.** Disulfide conservation pattern across bunyavirus genera: A) Amino acid sequence alignment of Hantaan virus (HNTV, P08668.1) and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHFV, AAK52743.1). The secondary structures of HNTV are indicated above the sequences and the secondary structure predicted by PSIPRED [83, 84] for CCHFV Gc below the alignment. Shown is only the aligned region of CCHFV Gc, which is much longer. The disulfide bond connectivity in HNTV Gc is shown with green numbers and the predicted connectivity in CCHFV is shown with red numbers. The four conserved regions across hantaviruses, nairoviruses, orthobunyaviruses, and tospoviruses are boxed and numbered as in Fig 6. A 5th box indicates a region with conserved orthobunya, tospo and nairovirus cysteine residues, but
less so in hantaviruses, spanning the AB loop in domain III. B) Corresponding amino acid sequence alignment of tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV, NP_049359.1) and Bunyamwera orthobunyavirus (BUNV, NP_047212.1) with the predicted secondary structures above and below the sequences and the predicted disulfide bond connectivity displayed with red and cyan numbers, respectively. C) Cartoon representation of the tip of the HNTV Gc domain II showing the location of the predicted disulfide bonds in CCHFV, BUNV, and TSWV Gc, drawn as cylinders connecting the predicted location of the corresponding cysteine residues color-coded as on the alignment of panels A and B.

(JPG)

**S1 Table.** *Crystallographic Statistics of all structures determined.* Each column represents a different diffraction data set, as indicated. The “beam line” row indicates, in parenthesis, the synchrotron to which the line belongs (ESRF: European Synchrotron radiation Facility, Grenoble, France; SOLEIL: French Synchrotron Laboratory at St Aubin, France).

(DOCX)

**S1 Movie.** *Quality of the electron density map for rGc in its post-fusion form.* Electron density maps contoured at 1 sigma level of the region around Glu106 for the low pH rGc structure crystallized in absence of KCl. The electron density around the protein is colored black, and surrounding waters red. The residues involved in the network of hydrogen bonds are labeled.

(MOV)

**S2 Movie.** *Quality of the electron density map in the KCL-containing crystals.* Electron density maps contoured at 1 sigma level of the region around Glu106 for the low pH rGc structure crystallized in presence of 600 mM KCl. The electron density around the protein and the K⁺ ion are colored black, and surrounding waters red. The residues involved in the polar network are labeled.

(MOV)

**S3 Movie.** *Quality of the electron density map in the crystals of the rGc/A5 complex.* Electron density maps contoured at 1 sigma (black) or 0.4 sigma (green) levels of the region around Glu106 for the structure of the neutral pH structure of the rGc/scFvA5 complex. The residues involved in the polar network are labeled.

(MOV)

**S4 Movie.** *K⁺ binding alters the conformation of Glu106 on the c strand.* The different panels of the S4 Fig were concatenated to create an animation illustrating the structural changes upon K⁺ binding.

(MP4)

## Acknowledgments

We thank Eric Crampon who helped design the initial constructs; Jimena Perez-Vargas who made the stable S2 cell lines expressing the Hantaan virus Gc ectodomain; Xiaokang Zhang who took electron micrographs of negative-stained recombinant monomeric Gc ectodomain; Ahmed Haouz and the staff at the crystallogenesis facility of Institut Pasteur for help with the robotized system; Fabrice Agou for access to the MALS instrument and discussion on data interpretation; Rodrigo Acuña, Nicolás Muena, Raúl Segovia and Vicente Muñoz at the Molecular Virology laboratory of Fundación Ciencia & Vida for their help and valuable discussions; Marie Flamand and Carole Tamietti from Institut Pasteur, and Peter Witkowski from “La Charité”, Berlin, GE, for discussion and some Hantaan virus experiments; all other members of
the Institut Pasteur "Unité de Virologie Structurale"; Patricia Sylvestre and the Risk Prevention Unit of the Institut Pasteur for their biosafety and biosecurity expertise; William Shepard and Pierre Legrand from Synchrotron Soleil for help during data collection and for helpful discussions; the staff at beam line ID23-2 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble, France) and staff at the beamline PX1 at the Swiss Light Source synchrotron (Villigen, Switzerland).

## Author Contributions

**Conceived and designed the experiments:** PGC EAB NDT FAR.

**Performed the experiments:** PGC EAB ES JLJ SAJ MAT PE GPA JPV.

**Analyzed the data:** PGC EAB NDT FAR.

**Wrote the paper:** PGC EAB NDT FAR.

## References

1. Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. The evolution and emergence of hantaviruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2015; 10:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.12.007 PMID: 25562117

2. Klempa B. Hantaviruses and climate change. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009; 15(6):518-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02848.x PMID: 19604276

3. Kruger DH, Figueiredo LT, Song JW, Klempa B. Hantaviruses—globally emerging pathogens. J Clin Virol. 2015; 64:128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.08.033 PMID: 25453325

4. Khan AS, Khabbaz RF, Armstrong LR, Holman RC, Bauer SP, Graber J, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: the first 100 US cases. J Infect Dis. 1996; 173(6):1297-303. PMID: 8648200

5. Earle D. Symposium on epidemic hemorrhagic fever. American J Med. 1954; 16:617-709.

6. Nunez JJ, Fritz CL, Knust B, Buttke D, Enge B, Novak MG, et al. Hantavirus infections among overnight visitors to Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20(3):386-93. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3944872. doi: 10.3201/eid2003.131581 PMID: 24565589

7. Oliveira RC, Sant'ana MM, Guterres A, Fernandes J, Hillesheim NL, Lucini C, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in a highly endemic area of Brazil. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;1-11.

8. Tadin A, Bjedov L, Margaletic J, Zibrat B, Krajinovic LC, Svoboda P, et al. High infection rate of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) with Puumala virus is associated with a winter outbreak of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Croatia. Epidemiol Infect. 2014; 142(9):1945-51. doi: 10.1017/S095026881300321X PMID: 24800636

9. Yu PB, Tian HY, Ma CF, Ma CA, Wei J, Lu XL, et al. Hantavirus infection in rodents and haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Shaanxi province, China, 1984-2012. Epidemiol Infect. 2015; 143 (2):405-11. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814001009 PMID: 24787374

10. Elliott R, Schmaljohn C. Bunyaviridae. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. 1. 6 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. p. 1244-82.

11. Reguera J, Gerlach P, Cusack S. Towards a structural understanding of RNA synthesis by negative strand RNA viral polymerases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2016; 36:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.01.002 PMID: 26826467

12. Vaney MC, Rey FA. Class II enveloped viruses. Cell Microbiol. 2011; 13(10):1451-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01653.x PMID: 21790946

13. Petterson RF. Synthesis, assembly and intracellular transport of *Bunyaviridae* membrane proteins In: Elliott RM, editor. The Bunyaviridae. New York: Plenum Press; 1996. p. 159-88.

14. Goldsmith CS, Elliott LH, Peters CJ, Zaki SR. Ultrastructural characteristics of Sin Nombre virus, causative agent of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Arch Virol. 1995; 140(12):2107-22. PMID: 8572935

15. Ravkov EV, Nichol ST, Compans RW. Polarized entry and release in epithelial cells of Black Creek Canal virus, a New World hantavirus. J Virol. 1997; 71(2):1147-54. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC191167. PMID: 8995636

16. Garry CE, Garry RF. Proteomics computational analyses suggest that the carboxyl terminal glycoproteins of Bunyaviruses are class II viral fusion protein (beta-penetrenes). Theor Biol Med Model. 2004; 1:10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC535339. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-1-10 PMID: 15544707
17. Tischler ND, Gonzalez A, Perez-Acle T, Rosemblatt M, Valenzuela PD. Hantavirus Gc glycoprotein: evidence for a class II fusion protein. J Gen Virol. 2005; 86(Pt 11):2937-47. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81083-0 PMID: 16227214

18. Cifuentes-Munoz N, Barriga GP, Valenzuela PD, Tischler ND. Aromatic and polar residues spanning the candidate fusion peptide of the Andes virus Gc protein are essential for membrane fusion and infection. J Gen Virol. 2011; 92(Pt 3):552-63. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.027235-0 PMID: 21123541

19. Plassmeyer ML, Soldan SS, Stachelek KM, Roth SM, Martin-Garcia J, Gonzalez-Scarano F. Mutagenesis of the La Crosse Virus glycoprotein supports a role for Gc (1066-1087) as the fusion peptide. Virology. 2007; 358(2):273-82. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1820767. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.050 PMID: 17027056

20. Dessau M, Modis Y. Crystal structure of glycoprotein C from Rift Valley fever virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(5):1696-701. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3562824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217780110 PMID: 23319635

21. Huiskonen JT, Overby AK, Weber F, Grunewald K. Electron cryo-microscopy and single-particle averaging of Rift Valley fever virus: evidence for GN-GC glycoprotein heterodimers. J Virol. 2009; 83(8):3762-9. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2663282. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02483-08 PMID: 19193794

22. Overby AK, Pettersson RF, Grunewald K, Huiskonen JT. Insights into bunyavirus architecture from electron cryotomography of Uukuniemi virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(7):2375-9. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2268144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708738105 PMID: 18272496

23. El Omari K, Iourin O, Harlos K, Grimes JM, Stuart DI. Structure of a pestivirus envelope glycoprotein E2 clarifies its role in cell entry. Cell Rep. 2013; 3(1):30-5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3607223. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.12.001 PMID: 23273918

24. Li Y, Wang J, Kanai R, Modis Y. Crystal structure of glycoprotein E2 from bovine viral diarrhea virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(17):6805-10. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3637714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300524110 PMID: 23569276

25. Khan AG, Whidby J, Miller MT, Scarborough H, Zatorski AV, Cygan A, et al. Structure of the core ectodomain of the hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein 2. Nature. 2014; 509(7500):381-4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4126800. doi: 10.1038/nature13117 PMID: 24553139

26. Kong L, Giang E, Nieusma T, Kadam RU, Cogburn KE, Hua Y, et al. Hepatitis C virus E2 envelope glycoprotein core structure. Science. 2013; 342(6162):1090-4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3954638. doi: 10.1126/science.1243876 PMID: 24288331

27. Bowden TA, Bitto D, McLees A, Yeromonahos C, Elliott RM, Huiskonen JT. Orthobunyavirus ultrastructure and the curious tripodal glycoprotein spike. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9(5):e1003374. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3656102. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003374 PMID: 23696739

28. Martin ML, Lindsey-Regnery H, Sasso DR, McCormick JB, Palmer E. Distinction between Bunyaviridae genera by surface structure and comparison with Hantaan virus using negative stain electron microscopy. Arch Virol. 1985; 86(1-2):17-28. PMID: 2412528

29. Battisti AJ, Chu YK, Chipman PR, Kaufmann B, Jonsson CB, Rossmann MG. Structural studies of Hantaan virus. J Virol. 2011; 85(2):835-41. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3020021. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01847-10 PMID: 21068243

30. Huiskonen JT, Hepojoki J, Laurinmaki P, Vaheri A, Lankinen H, Butcher SJ, et al. Electron cryotomography of Tula hantavirus suggests a unique assembly paradigm for enveloped viruses. J Virol. 2010; 84(10):4889-97. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2863824. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00057-10 PMID: 20219926

31. Li S, Rissanen I, Zeltina A, Hepojoki J, Raghwani J, Harlos K, et al. A Molecular-Level Account of the Antigenic Hantaviral Surface. Cell Rep. 2016; 15(5):959-67. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4858563. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.082 PMID: 27117403

32. Nissim A, Hoogenboom HR, Tomlinson IM, Flynn G, Midgley C, Lane D, et al. Antibody fragments from a 'single pot' phage display library as immunochemical reagents. EMBO J. 1994; 13(3):692-8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC394860. PMID: 7508862

33. Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Ginestoux C, Jabado-Michaloud J, Folch G, Bellahcene F, et al. IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37 part 6 (Database issue): D1006-12. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2686541. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn838 PMID: 18978023

34. Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC. The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution. Nature. 1995; 375(6529):291-8. doi: 10.1038/375291a0 PMID: 7753193

35. Lescar J, Roussel A, Wien MW, Navaza J, Fuller SD, Wengler G, et al. The Fusion glycoprotein shell of Semliki Forest virus: an icosahedral assembly primed for fusogenic activation at endosomal pH. Cell. 2001; 105(1):137-48. PMID: 11301009
36. DuBois RM, Vaney MC, Tortorici MA, Kurdi RA, Barba-Spaeth G, Krey T, et al. Functional and evolutionary insight from the crystal structure of rubella virus protein E1. Nature. 2013; 493(7433):552–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11741 PMID: 23292515

37. Halaby DM, Poupon A, Mornon J. The immunoglobulin fold family: sequence analysis and 3D structure comparisons. Protein Eng. 1999; 12(7):563–71. PMID: 10436082

38. Horling J, Lundkvist A. Single amino acid substitutions in Puumala virus envelope glycoproteins G1 and G2 eliminate important neutralization epitopes. Virus Res. 1997; 48(1):89–100. PMID: 9140197

39. Xu Z, Wei L, Wang L, Wang H, Jiang S. The in vitro and in vivo protective activity of monoclonal anti-bodies directed against Hantaan virus: potential application for immunotherapy and passive immunization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 298(4):552–8. PMID: 12408987

40. Lu X, Yin W, Yang Q, Lei Y, Yang J, Sun M, et al. Identification of oligopeptides mimicking the receptor-binding domain of Hantaan virus envelope glycoprotein from a phage-displayed peptide library. Can J Microbiol. 2009; 55(6):664–71. doi: 10.1139/w09-012 PMID: 19767836

41. Yan G, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Yi J, Liu B, Xu Z, et al. Identification of a novel B-cell epitope of Hantaan virus glycoprotein recognized by neutralizing 3D8 monoclonal antibody. J Gen Virol. 2012; 93(Pt 12):2595–600. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.045302-0 PMID: 22933664

42. Koch J, Liang M, Queitsch I, Kraus AA, Bautz EK. Human recombinant neutralizing antibodies against hantaan virus G2 protein. Virology. 2003; 308(1):64–73. PMID: 12706090

43. Kleinfelter LM, Jangra RK, Jae LT, Herbert AS, Mittler E, Stiles KM, et al. Haploid Genetic Screen Reveals a Profound and Direct Dependence on Cholesterol for Hantavirus Membrane Fusion. MBio. 2015; 6(4):e00801. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4488941. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00801-15 PMID: 26126854

44. Gibbons DL, Erk I, Reilly B, Navaza J, Kielian M, Rey FA, et al. Visualization of the target-membrane-inserted fusion protein of Semliki Forest virus by combined electron microscopy and crystallography. Cell. 2003; 114(5):573–83. PMID: 13678581

45. Stiasny K, Bressanelli S, Lepault J, Rey FA, Heinz FX. Characterization of a membrane-associated trimeric low-pH-induced Form of the class II viral fusion protein E from tick-borne encephalitis virus and its crystallization. J Virol. 2004; 78(6):3178–83. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC353737. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.6.3178-3183.2004 PMID: 14990739

46. Acuna R, Bignon E, Mancini R, Lozach PY, Tischler ND. Acidification triggers Andes hantavirus membrane fusion and rearrangement of Gc into a stable post-fusion homotrimer. J Gen Virol. 2015.

47. Kielian M, Rey FA. Virus membrane-fusion proteins: more than one way to make a hairpin. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006; 4(1):67–76. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1326 PMID: 16357862

48. Modis Y. Class II fusion proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013; 790:150–66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7651-1_8 PMID: 23884590

49. Klein DE, Choi JL, Harrison SC. Structure of a dengue virus envelope protein late-stage fusion intermediate. J Virol. 2013; 87(4):2287–93. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3571469. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02957-12 PMID: 23236058

50. Bressanelli S, Stiasny K, Allison SL, Stura EA, Duquerroy S, Lescar J, et al. Structure of a flavivirus envelope glycoprotein in its low-pH-induced membrane fusion conformation. EMBO J. 2004; 23(4):728–38. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC380989. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600064 PMID: 14963486

51. Gibbons DL, Vaney MC, Roussel A, Vigouroux A, Reilly B, Lepault J, et al. Conformational change and protein-protein interactions of the fusion protein of Semliki Forest virus. Nature. 2004; 427(6972):320–5. doi: 10.1038/nature02239 PMID: 14737160

52. Halldorsson S, Behrens AJ, Harlos K, Huiskonen JT, Elliott RM, Crispin M, et al. Structure of a phleboviral envelope glycoprotein reveals a consolidated model of membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(26):7154–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603827113 PMID: 27325770

53. Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, Harrison SC. Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion. Nature. 2004; 427(6972):313–9. doi: 10.1038/nature02165 PMID: 14737159

54. Barriga GP, Villalón-Letelier F, Márquez CL, Bignon EA, Acuña R, Ross BH, et al. Inhibition of the hantavirus fusion process by predicted domain III and stem peptides from glycoprotein Gc. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2016; in press.

55. Liao M, Kielian M. Domain III from class II fusion proteins functions as a dominant-negative inhibitor of virus membrane fusion. J Cell Biol. 2005; 171(1):111–20. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2171229. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200507075 PMID: 16216925

56. Cifuentes-Munoz N, Darlix JL, Tischler ND. Development of a lentiviral vector system to study the role of the Andes virus glycoproteins. Virus Res. 2010; 153(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.001 PMID: 20619306
57. Shi X, Elliott RM. Analysis of N-linked glycosylation of hantaan virus glycoproteins and the role of oligosaccharide side chains in protein folding and intracellular trafficking. J Virol. 2004; 78(10):5414-22. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC400336. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5414-5422.2004 PMID: 15113920

58. Zheng F, Ma J, Shao L, Wang G, Chen F, Zhang Y, et al. Defining the N-linked glycosylation site of Hantaan virus envelope glycoproteins essential for cell fusion. J Microbiol. 2007; 45(1):41-7. PMID: 17342054

59. Perez-Vargas J, Krey T, Valansi C, Avinoam O, Haouz A, Jamin M, et al. Structural basis of eukaryotic cell-cell fusion. Cell. 2014; 157(2):407-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.020 PMID: 24725407

60. Acuna R, Cifuentes-Munoz N, Marquez CL, Bulling M, Klingstrom J, Mancini R, et al. Hantavirus Gn and Gc glycoproteins self-assemble into virus-like particles. J Virol. 2014; 88(4):2344-8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3911568. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03118-13 PMID: 24335294

61. Somerharju P. Pyrene-labeled lipids as tools in membrane biophysics and cell biology. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002; 116(1-2):57-74. PMID: 12093535

62. Gauci PJ, McAllister J, Mitchell IR, Boyle DB, Bulach DM, Weir RP, et al. Genomic characterisation of three Mapputta group viruses, a serogroup of Australian and Papua New Guinean bunyaviruses associated with human disease. PLoS One. 2015; 10(1):e0116561. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4294684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116561 PMID: 25588016

63. Meng J, Liu P, Zhu L, Zou C, Li J, Chen B. Complete Genome Sequence of Mulberry Vein Banding Associated Virus, a New Tospovirus Infecting Mulberry. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0136196. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4546196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136196 PMID: 26291718

64. Li CX, Shi M, Tian JH, Lin XD, Kang YJ, Chen LJ, et al. Unprecedented genomic diversity of RNA viruses in arthropods reveals the ancestry of negative-sense RNA viruses. Elife. 2015; 4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4384744.

65. Backovic M, Jardetzky TS. Class III viral membrane fusion proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009; 19(2):189-96. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3076093. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.012 PMID: 19356922

66. Dube M, Rey FA, Kielian M. Rubella virus: first calcium-requiring viral fusion protein. PLoS Pathog. 2014; 10(12):e1004530. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4256232. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004530 PMID: 25474548

67. Vincent MJ, Sanchez AJ, Erickson BR, Basak A, Chretien M, Seidah NG, et al. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus glycoprotein proteolytic processing by subtilase SKI-1. J Virol. 2003; 77(16):8640-9. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC167219. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.16.8640-8649.2003 PMID: 12885882

68. Kristensen P, Winter G. Proteolytic selection for protein folding using filamentous bacteriophages. Fold Des. 1998; 3(5):321-8. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00044-3 PMID: 9806934

69. Sivasubramanian A, Sircar A, Chaudhury S, Gray JJ. Toward high-resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody-antigen docking. Proteins. 2009; 74(2):497-514. Epub 2008/12/09. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2909601. doi: 10.1002/prot.22309 PMID: 19062174

70. Lyskov S, Chou FC, Conchuir SO, Der BS, Drew K, Kuroda D, et al. Serverification of molecular modeling applications: the Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE). PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e63906. Epub 2013/05/30. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3661552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063906 PMID: 23717507

71. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr. 2007; 40(Pt 4):658-74. Epub 2007/08/01. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2483472. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206 PMID: 19461840

72. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010; 66(Pt 2):213-21. Epub 2010/02/04. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2815670. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925 PMID: 20124702

73. Terwilliger T. SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2004; 11(Pt 1):49-52. Epub 2003/12/04. PMID: 14646132

74. Terwilliger TC, Adams PD, Read RJ, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009; 65(Pt 6):582-601. Epub 2009/05/26. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2685735. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909012098 PMID: 19465773

75. Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. 2010; 66:12-21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073 PMID: 20057044

76. Zheng HP, Chordia MD, Cooper DR, Chruszcz M, Muller P, Sheldrick GM, et al. Validation of metal-binding sites in macromolecular structures with the CheckMyMetal web server. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9(1):156-70. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.172 PMID: 24356774
77. Castile JD, Taylor KMG. Factors affecting the size distribution of liposomes produced by freeze-thaw extrusion. Int J Pharm. 1999; 188(1):87-95. PMID: 10528086

78. Godoy P, Marsac D, Stefas E, Ferrer P, Tischler ND, Pino K, et al. Andes virus antigens are shed in urine of patients with acute hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. J Virol. 2009; 83(10):5046-55. Epub 2009/03/13. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2682085. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02409-08 PMID: 19279096

79. Mangeot PE, Negre D, Dubois B, Winter AJ, Leissner P, Mehtali M, et al. Development of minimal lenti-virus vectors derived from simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac251) and their use for gene transfer into human dendritic cells. J Virol. 2000; 74(18):8307-15. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC116340. PMID: 10954529

80. Mangeot PE, Duperrier K, Negre D, Boson B, Rigal D, Cosset FL, et al. High levels of transduction of human dendritic cells with optimized SIV vectors. Mol Ther. 2002; 5(3):283-90. Epub 2002/02/28. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0541 PMID: 11863418

81. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676-82. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3855844. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 PMID: 22743772

82. Schrodinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8. 2015.

83. Buchan DW, Minneci F, Nugent TC, Bryson K, Jones DT. Scalable web services for the PSIPRED Protein Analysis Workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Web Server issue):W349-57. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3692098. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt381 PMID: 23748958

84. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 1999; 292(2):195-202. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 PMID: 10493868