# Psoriasis and sexuality: Patients express their feelings

Romain Salle, Bruno Halioua, Gaëlle Le Fur, Roberte Aubert, Jason Philippe Shourick, Charles Taieb

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Romain Salle, Bruno Halioua, Gaëlle Le Fur, Roberte Aubert, Jason Philippe Shourick, et al., Psoriasis and sexuality: Patients express their feelings. Skin Health and Disease, 2022, 3 (3), pp.e199. 10.1002/ski2.199. hal-04233276

HAL Id: hal-04233276

https://hal.science/hal-04233276v1

Submitted on 26 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

SKIN HEALTH AND DISEASE
Open Access

# Psoriasis and sexuality: Patients express their feelings

Romain Salle<fnref n="1" /> | Bruno Halioua<fnref n="2" /> | Gaëlle Le Fur<fnref n="3" /> | Roberte Aubert<fnref n="4" /> |

Jason Shourick<fnref n="5" /> | Charles Taieb<fnref n="6" />,<fnref n="7" />

**Correspondence**

Charles Taieb, French Society of Human Skin Sciences, [SFSHP], Maison de la dermatologie, Paris, France.

Email: charles.taieb@emma.clinic

**Funding information**

UCB Pharma

**Abstract**

**Background:** In France, psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. For several years now, particular attention has been given to the quality of life (Qol) of psoriasis patients. Sexual dysfunction (SD) defined as not wanting or enjoying sexual experience is an important component of Qol. Psoriasis through its physical symptoms and psychological consequences can thus be responsible for SD.

**Method:** The survey participants were recruited through the national psoriasis dermatitis patient association.

**Result:** 41% (577) patients reported having SD related to their psoriasis. Women reported significantly more SD than men (387 [44.7%] vs. 190 [35%], *p* < 0.001). For 396 (28.1%) patients SD due to their psoriasis manifested as a reduction in the frequency of sexual activity, for 207 (14.7%) as change in their sexual practice, and for 284 (27.4%) as an absence of sexual activity without significant difference between women and men. The main consequence of sexual difficulties for patients was loss of self-confidence in 627 (44.5%) cases, guilt in 209 (14.8%) cases, couple life impairment in 214 (15.2%) cases, isolation in 260 (18.5%) cases and frustration.

**Discussion:** In this study investigating SD related to psoriasis, we found that the disease impact sexual relations of 41% of patients of both gender. The main causes of SD were both physical alone and psychological alone, in the same proportions. The physical symptoms of psoriasis are therefore not the only ones responsible for the sexual discomfort reported from patients in their sexual relations. This may be due to a discomfort of the patient or the physician when talking about sexuality because they can't find the terms to talk about this subject often considered taboo and the age or gender difference. This aspect of the disease should be considered by physicians who care for patients with psoriasis, especially dermatologists. Finally, other strategies should be implemented, such as patient talk groups, referral guides or personalised therapeutic education.

1 | INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects 0.14% to 1.99% of the adult population within different countries.<fnref n="1" /> Psoriasis causes physical

symptoms like itch and burning sensations and is associated with psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety.<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" /> For several years now, particular attention has been given to the quality of life (Qol) of psoriasis patients. This attention has manifested itself with a

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

© 2022 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

<footnote n="1">¹Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Université Paris-Saclay, USQY, EA4340-BECCOH, AP-HP, Ambroise-Paré hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Dermatology, Institut Alfred Fournier, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Sociologist, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴President of France Psoriasis [patient association], Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Department of Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, UMR 1027 INSERM-University of Toulouse III, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU), Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶French Society of Human Skin Sciences, [SFSHP], Maison de la dermatologie, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Patient Priority Department, EMMA, Fontenay-sous Bois, France</footnote>
paradigm shift in the introduction of systemic treatment going from a prescription according to the severity of the disease to one centred on the burden of disease.⁴ Sexual dysfunction (SD) defined as not wanting or enjoying sexual experience is an important component of QoL.⁵ Psoriasis through its physical symptoms and psychological consequences can thus be responsible for SD.⁶ Recent trials have demonstrated that biological therapies improve psoriasis patients' sexual function.⁷⁻¹² However, the tools most frequently used in studies to assess sexual dysfunction in psoriasis such as the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) do not allow a global and systemic assessment of the impact of the disease on patients' sexuality of both gender and focus mainly on genital function.⁶ Yet some studies have demonstrated that loss of self-confidence related to the degradation of body image or the difficulty to reveal their intimacy in front of a sexual partner might actually be an important part of SD in psoriasis patients.¹³ Moreover studies show that sexual function is rarely discussed during medical consultation and that patients struggle to be advised concerning potential solutions.¹⁴,¹⁵

The aim of this survey study is to evaluate SD, its appreciation during medical encounters and patients' opinion on potential solutions to be implemented in clinical practice among male and female psoriasis patients.

## 2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional, patient driven study.

### 2.1 | Study population

The survey participants were recruited between September 2019 and March 2020 through the national psoriasis dermatitis patient association (Association France Psoriasis). The National Association posted an announcement and a link on their website, on social networks and through their newsletter on and a reminder. Respondents who stated that their psoriasis had been diagnosed by a physician were proposed to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: (i) being able to understand French language; (ii) having given consent to participate in the study after receiving written information about the study; (iii) being 18 years old or older.

### 2.2 | Data collection

Respondents were asked to answer a questionnaire with sociodemographic and personal information (Supplementary Material S1). Questions concerned gender, age

**What is already known about this topic?**

* For several years now, particular attention has been given to the quality of life of psoriasis patients.

* Sexual dysfunction defined as not wanting or enjoying sexual experience is an important component of quality of life.

* Psoriasis through its physical symptoms and psychological consequences can thus be responsible for Sexual dysfunction

**What does this study add?**

* The main consequence of sexual difficulties for patients was loss of self-confidence, guilt, couple life impairment, isolation and frustration

category, professional level, relationship status, comorbidities, history of psoriasis and treatment. To limit memory bias, questions about current sexuality were given a 3 month timeframe when possible. To follow a patient driven research methodology closed questions with multiple choice were developed by the patient association and concerned the overall life aspects modified by psoriasis, the way psoriasis impacted their sexual life, the presence or not of SD related to psoriasis or its treatments, the main difficulty that prevented patients from having a satisfying sexual life, the consequences of these difficulties on their sexual life and the management of their SD with their partner. For the main difficulties that prevented patients from having a satisfying sexual life, we have classified them into four main categories: physical issues (itch, joint pain, vaginal dryness-erectile dysfunction-ejaculation disorder, other pain experienced during sex, joint stiffness, loss of mobility), psychological issues (deterioration of body image related to skin lesions, loss of self-confidence, low morale-depression), both physical and psychological issues (tiredness, decreased libido-loss of desire) and romantic relationship issues (decreased in seduction power, partner's perception impairment, misunderstanding of partner[s]).

Additional questions were asked about the specialty of their treating physician, whether or not they discuss their sex life with their physician, whether or not they would like to discuss their sex life with their physician, and what tools or services related to psoriasis could help them have a more fulfilling sex life.

### 2.3 | Statistical analysis

Categorical values were described as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables as mean and
standard deviation. Patients were compared depending on whether they were men or women. Categorical variables were compared using Chi2 test, and continuous variables using t-test.

# 3 | RESULTS

## 3.1 | Study population

From May to June 2020, 1409 patients answered a questionnaire about their sexual difficulties in relation to their psoriasis. Table 1 reports the main characteristics of the study patients. One hundred and forty-two (10.1%) patients were under 30 years of age, 379 (26.9%) were between 31 and 45 years of age, 470 (33.4%) were between 46 and 60 years of age and 418 (29.7%) were 61 years of age and older. Eight hundred and sixty six (61.5%) patients were women. The mean disease duration was 23.2 years (± standard deviation 15). In terms of treatment, 862 (61.2%) patients had topical treatment, 148 (10.5%) had phototherapy, 334 (23.7%) had systemic therapy and 314 (22.3%) had biologic therapy. Concerning co-morbidities, 409 (29%) patients reported an association with psoriatic arthritis, 191 (13.6%) had depression, 180 (12.8%) had obesity, 99 (7%) had diabetes and 88 (6.2%) had cardiovascular disorders.

## 3.2 | SD associated with psoriasis

Overall, 577 (41%) patients reported having SD related to their psoriasis. Women reported significantly more SD than men (387 (44.7%) versus 190 (35%), *p* < 0.001) (Table 2). For 396 (28.1%) patients SD due to their psoriasis manifested as a reduction in the frequency of sexual activity, for 207 (14.7%) as change in their sexual practice, and for 284 (27.4%) as an absence of sexual activity without significant difference between women and men. Concerning the main reasons for SD, 1038 responses were available including 387 (37.3%) physical issues alone, 378 (36.4%) psychological issues alone, 182 (17.5%) both physical and psychological issues and 91 (8.8%) romantic relationship issues. The details of the main causes of sexual issues are summarised in Figure 1. No significant difference was found between women and men. The main consequence of sexual difficulties for patients was loss of self-confidence in 627 (44.5%) cases, guilt in 209 (14.8%) cases, couple life impairment in 214 (15.2%) cases, isolation in 260 (18.5%) cases and frustration in 402 (28.5%) cases (Figure 2). Guilt was significantly more reported by women (160 (18.5%) versus 49 (9%), *p* < 0.001), with no significant difference found for other main consequences (Table 2).

<table><caption>TABLE 1 Major baseline demographic and disease characteristics (n = 1409)</caption><thead><tr><th>Characteristic</th><th>Missing data (md) = n (%)</th><th>Total (n = 1409)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Socio-demographic characteristics</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Age (years)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;30 years</td><td>142 (10.1)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>31-45 years</td><td>379 (26.9)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>46-60 years</td><td>470 (33.4)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt;61 years</td><td>418 (29.7)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female</td><td>866 (61.5)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Disease characteristics</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mean disease duration (years)</td><td>23 (15)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Treatment</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Topical treatment</td><td>862 (61.2)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Phototherapy</td><td>148 (10.5)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Systemic therapy</td><td>334 (23.7)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Biological therapy</td><td>314 (22.3)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Comorbidities</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Psoriatic arthritis</td><td>409 (29)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Obesity</td><td>180 (12.8)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td>99 (7)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cardio-vascular disorder</td><td>88 (6.2)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depression</td><td>191 (13.6)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Relationship status md = 52 (3.8)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Single</td><td>351 (25.9)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1 year</td><td>56 (4.1)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1-5 years</td><td>107 (7.9)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt;5 years</td><td>188 (13.9)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>In couple</td><td>1006 (74.1)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;1 year</td><td>53 (3.9)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1-5 years</td><td>120 (8.8)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5-10 years</td><td>117 (8.6)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&gt;10 years</td><td>716 (52.8)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Children</td><td>1032 (73.2)</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Note: Mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.

## 3.3 | Managing SD with one's partner

Regarding the family situation, 351 (25.9%) patients were single (188 (13.9%) for more than 5 years), 1006 (74.1%) patients were in couples (716 (52.8%) more than 10 years) and 1032 (73.2%) patients had children. Regarding their relationship with their partner, 1093
<table><caption>TABLE 2 Comparison of sexual dysfunction between female and male patients (n = 1409)</caption><thead><tr><th>Characteristic<br>Missing data (md) = n (%)</th><th>Female<br>(n = 866, 61.5%)</th><th>Male<br>(n = 543, 38.5%)</th><th>p value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Comparison of sexual dysfunction</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sexual dysfunction</td><td>387 (44.7)</td><td>190 (35)</td><td>p &lt; 0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Reduction in frequency md =</td><td>246 (28.4)</td><td>150 (27.6)</td><td>p = 0.699</td></tr><tr><td>Modification of sexual practice</td><td>130 (15)</td><td>77 (14.2)</td><td>p = 0.692</td></tr><tr><td>Absence of sexual activity md = 371 (26.3)</td><td>180 (28)</td><td>104 (26.4)</td><td>p = 0.616</td></tr><tr><td>Comparison of main reasons for sexual dysfunction md = 371 (26.3)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Physical</td><td>251 (39)</td><td>136 (34.5)</td><td>p = 0.062</td></tr><tr><td>Psychological</td><td>236 (36.6)</td><td>142 (36)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Both physical and psychological</td><td>112 (17.4)</td><td>70 (17.8)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Romantic relationship</td><td>45 (7)</td><td>46 (11.7)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Comparison of main consequences of sexual dysfunction</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Loss of confidence</td><td>398 (46)</td><td>229 (42.2)</td><td>p = 0.169</td></tr><tr><td>Guilt</td><td>160 (18.5)</td><td>49 (9)</td><td>p &lt; 0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Couple life impairment</td><td>134 (15.5)</td><td>80 (14.7)</td><td>p = 0.76</td></tr><tr><td>Isolation</td><td>163 (18.8)</td><td>97 (17.9)</td><td>p = 0.673</td></tr><tr><td>Frustration</td><td>242 (27.9)</td><td>160 (29.5)</td><td>p = 0.545</td></tr><tr><td>Comparison of relationship status and sexual dysfunction impact</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Single</td><td>232 (28)</td><td>119 (22.5)</td><td>p &lt; 0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Major obstacle to the search for a new partner</td><td>216 (24.9)</td><td>142 (26.2)</td><td>p = 0.545</td></tr><tr><td>In couple</td><td>595 (72)</td><td>411 (77.5)</td><td>p &lt; 0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Felt good in their body</td><td>667 (77)</td><td>426 (78.5)</td><td>p = 0.555</td></tr><tr><td>Could express their issues with their partner</td><td>718 (82.9)</td><td>449 (82.7)</td><td>p = 0.942</td></tr><tr><td>Felt understood by their partner</td><td>729 (84.2)</td><td>473 (87.1)</td><td>p = 0.142</td></tr><tr><td>Could find a solution to their issues with their partner</td><td>720 (83.1)</td><td>466 (85.8)</td><td>p = 0.202</td></tr></tbody></table>

Note: n (%) for categorical variables.

(77.6%) patients felt good in their body, 1167 (82.8%) patients could express their issues, 1202 (85.3%) patients felt understood by their partner and 1186 (84.2%) patients could find a solution to their issues (Figure 3). For single patients, psoriasis was considered a major obstacle for finding a new partner in 358 (25.4%) cases. Women were significantly more likely to be single, but there was no difference in terms of difficulty in finding a new partner. For patients in couples, there was no difference between sexes in the management of sexual dysfunction with their partner (Table 2).

## 3.4 | SD care management

Overall, 561 (39.8%) patients were taken in charge by a dermatologist. Other physicians involved were

general practitioners (14.5%) and rheumatologists (8.6%). Among patients, 783 (81.3%) never had a conversation about sex with their physician. If a conversation took place, it was started in 97 (10.1%) cases by the patient, in 75 cases (7.8%) by the doctor and 7 (0.7%) cases by both. Four hundred and one (28.5%) patients would be more interested in discussing their SD with their physicians. The means to manage their psoriasis SD proposed by patients were a collection of stories or advice from other patients (28.3%), a support compiling general recommendations from various qualified professionals (25%), a forum for anonymous exchanges with other patients (17.9%), individual exchange times with a sexologist (12%), a discussion groups led by a psychologist or sexologist (12.4%) and guide of positions adapted according to painful areas (4.5%).
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** Main cause of sexual issues reported by patients with psoriasis. Of the 1038 answers to the question about the main difficulty that prevented patients from having a satisfying sexual life. Each patient had the possibility to choose up to 3 issues among the different difficulties proposed in the questionnaire</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 2** Consequences of sexual dysfunction in psoriasis patients. Upset plot presenting main consequences of psoriasis related sexual dysfunction, Set size (purple barplot) plot presents the prevalence of each cause, combination part reads the following way, the orange dots and connections explain the combination and the green barplot presents combination size</figcaption></figure>

<caption>**FIGURE 3** Relationship with partners in psoriasis patients. Upset plot presenting relation with partner concerning psoriasis related sexual dysfunction, Set size (purple barplot) plot presents the prevalence of each partners related effect, combination part reads the following way, the orange dots and connections explain the combination and the green barplot presents combination size</caption>

4 | DISCUSSION

In this study investigating SD related to psoriasis, we found that the disease impact sexual relations of 41% of patients of both gender. This result is consistent with several other studies.¹⁶⁻¹⁸ Comparing the two genders, we also find that sexual disorders are more often present in women. This gender difference has been observed before, where women with psoriasis are at greater risk of SD than man.⁶,¹⁹ These new data seem to be explained by the fact that women are more

impacted by the negative psychological and sexual consequences of psoriasis as well as the degradation of body image which induces an alteration of the capacities of seduction.¹⁷

In our study, the main causes of SD were both physical alone and psychological alone, in the same proportions. The physical symptoms of psoriasis are therefore not the only ones responsible for the sexual discomfort reported from patients in their sexual relations. The psychological aspect thus seems to become predominant in the sexual life of psoriasis patients, for whom skin lesions are more disabling in their appearance than in their physical impact. This observation also argues that the severity of the disease is not
necessarily related to the intensity of psychological disorders in psoriasis patients.²⁰ In some patients, deterioration in body image related to the skin lesion and loss of self-confidence was reported as difficulties related to their sexual life which is consistent with a study on the effect of body image on SD in psoriasis.¹³ In addition, the multiplicity of QoL domains affected by psoriasis confirms their concomitant influences on patients' sexual functions and their mutual influences on each other.²¹

The SD reported by the patients in this study also have psychological consequences of its own, including loss of self-confidence, frustration, isolation and guilt, which is described more often by women. In addition, 14% of patients reported suffering from depression in our study, a similar proportion found in other studies.² However, depressive disorders in psoriasis are described as both a cause and a consequence of SD.⁸,¹⁶,¹⁷,²²,²³ Thus, psoriasis patients suffering from SD find themselves in a vicious circle where the psychological impact of these disorders leads to new psychological complications which in turn will further handicap patients in their sexual lives.

When we look at the consequences of SD within their relationships, it seems that this is well managed by patients in couples (in both genders), especially through discussion with their partners. The fact that patients can exchange and find solutions with their partners is a positive point. Indeed, psoriasis can also have a psychological impact on the partner, sometimes greater than the patient himself.²⁴ This can then deteriorate family life, worsen the patient's quality of life and thus lead to additional psychological distress. On the contrary, psoriasis seems to be a handicap in the search of new partners by single patients who report it as a major obstacle in 25% of cases and equally between male and female. This notion is also found in other skin diseases such as vitiligo²⁵ and can be explained by the degradation of body image or the loss of self-confidence of the patient secondary to the stigmatising nature of these skin lesions. This difficulty in being able to look for a new partner can then aggravate the patient's feelings of isolation or frustration and cause even greater psychological distress. In this sense, special attention should be given to the single patient experiencing these relational difficulties so that systemic treatment can be provided early in the history of the disease. Especially since the patient's psychological distress is not always related to the extent of skin lesions or clinical severity.²⁰

In the meantime, there is likely a lack of care for SD by physicians that patients during clinical encounters for psoriasis. First of all, there is a miscommunication on the part of patients and physicians about SD. Similarly to other studies,²⁶ most patients (81%) never had a conversation with their physician about their SD and when they did it was more often started by patients than physician.

This may be due to a discomfort of the patient or the physician when talking about sexuality because they can't find the terms to talk about this subject often considered taboo and the age or gender difference between patients and their physician.²⁶,²⁷ However it may also be due to a lack of information about the link between psoriasis and SD and that some treatments of psoriasis can improve SD management.

Contrary to other pathologies such as diabetes where sexuality is more easily addressed by general practitioners,²⁸ it is also likely that physicians caring for psoriatic patients may not always be aware that SD is common in this condition. Furthermore, physicians should be aware that SD is a real concern for patients which can handicap their relationships and be responsible for psychological distress. Particularly given the fact that 29% of patients in our study would be more interested in discussing their SD with their physicians. SD should therefore be routinely discussed during consultations with psoriasis patients in order to anticipate their needs and expectations in their care.

Moreover, our study also explores the different media through which patients would like to be informed and manage their sexual problems related to psoriasis. To begin, patients highlighted the need to feel more supported and share with other patients, while still favouring anonymous and online possibilities. This reflects the need for patients to feel more accompanied and realize how common is their SD among other psoriasis patients. Patients also favoured the help of practical guides such as a support compiling general recommendations or sexual positions adapted according to the painful areas whether on paper or digital formats. Finally, within their care pathway, patients also request time for exchange and discussion, with physicians but also with other professions, more specifically with psychologists, or sexologists who are specialised in the management of SD. It would therefore be interesting to integrate the patient in the management of his SD through personalised therapeutic education and to have a multidisciplinary vision of the QoL in psoriasis in terms of sexuality as it is already the case in other diseases such as HIV.²⁹

Our study had several limitations. First, the format of the questionnaire may have led to a memorisation bias because patients who had previously identified sexual difficulties or problems in their relationships were more able to recall SD. To minimise this bias we gave a 3 month timeframe whenever it was possible. It is also difficult to assess SD in single patients because practice and expectations differ from one person to another. For example, one party may not be sexually active and therefore may not be concerned with an important amount of the questionnaire and even on an online questionnaire might still be taboo for some. However using the online questionnaire format and having
questions designed by the patient themselves mini-
mised the risk to have inappropriate items.

Second, our study did not specifically assess
physical problems related to sexual disorders such as
ED, vaginal dryness or ejaculation disorders because
these three items were combined in the questionnaire.
The majority of studies focussing on SD in psoriasis
take these factors into account,⁶ especially as ED is a
major component of sexual dysfunction in psoriasis,
often related to the patient's psychological state.³⁰
However the aim of our study was to more specifically
assess the psychological and relational mechanisms
responsible for SD in psoriasis as well as how patients
feel about their partners and physicians.

Similarly, the locations of psoriasis skin lesions were
not asked for in the questionnaire despite the involve-
ment of certain locations, particularly genital psoriasis,
in SD and impaired QoL.³¹ Moreover, genital psoriasis is
often under-diagnosed in consultation mainly due to
patient discomfort or a lack of attention from the
physician,³² which in light of our study could be related
to the miscommunication on SD.

Finally, since this questionnaire was not conducted
by a physician, it was not possible for us to determine
the severity of patients' psoriasis as well as the accu-
racy of their medical history or treatments. Conse-
quently, we cannot determine whether the intensity of
the SD reported by patients is related to the severity of
their dermatological condition nor can we determine
whether the treatments received by patients, and more
specifically biological therapies, have led to an
improvement as demonstrated in previous studies.⁷⁻¹²
It would therefore be interesting to evaluate whether
the improvement of psoriasis sexual disorders following
treatment could also improve the psychological and
relational consequences, in association with the use of
patient guides and multidisciplinary management with
sexologists and psychologists.

In conclusion this study shows that psoriasis can be
responsible for SD in patients because of physical
suffering but also resulting from possible psychological
impairment. This aspect of the disease should be
considered by physicians who care for patients with
psoriasis, especially dermatologists. Finally, other
strategies should be implemented, such as patient talk
groups, referral guides or personalised therapeutic
education.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank patients who sponta-
neously responded to the request made by their asso-
ciation: France Psoriasis. This study received funding
from the UCB Pharma.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

**Romain Salle:** Validation (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal); Writing – review & editing (Equal). **Bruno Halioua:** Methodology (Equal); Validation (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal). **Gaelle Le Fur:** Conceptualisation (Equal); Supervision (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal). **Roberte Aubert:** Conceptualisation (Equal); Project administration (Equal); Validation (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal). **Jason Shourick:** Conceptualisation (Equal); Project administration (Equal); Validation (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal). **Charles Taieb:** Conceptualisation (Equal); Data curation (Equal); Methodology (Lead); Project administration (Lead); Supervision (Equal); Visualisation (Equal); Writing – original draft (Equal); Writing – review & editing (Equal).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are
available from the corresponding author upon reason-
able request.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCES

1. Parisi R, Iskandar IYK, Kontopantelis E, Augustin M, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modelling study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1590. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1590

2. Dowlatshahi EA, Wakkee M, Arends LR, Nijsten T. The prevalence and odds of depressive symptoms and clinical depression in psoriasis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(6):1542–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.508

3. Dalgard FJ, Gieler U, Tomas-Aragones L, Lien L, Poot F, Jemec GB, et al. The psychological burden of skin diseases: a cross-sectional multicenter study among dermatological out-patients in 13 European countries. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(4):984–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.530

4. Mattei PL, Corey KC, Kimball AB. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): the correlation between disease severity and psychological burden in patients treated with biological therapies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(3):333–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12106

5. McCabe MP, Sharlip ID, Atalla E, Balon R, Fisher AD, Laumann E, et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the fourth international consultation on sexual medicine 2015. J Sex Med. 2016;13(2):135–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.019

6. Molina-Leyva A, Salvador-Rodriguez L, Martinez-Lopez A, Ruiz-Carrascosa JC, Arias-Santiago S. Association between psoriasis and sexual and erectile dysfunction in epidemiologic studies: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(1):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3442

7. Guenther L, Han C, Szapary P, Schenkel B, Poulin Y, Bourcier M, et al. Impact of ustekinumab on health-related quality of life and sexual difficulties associated with psoriasis: results from two phase III clinical trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25: 851–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04082.x
8. Guenther L, Warren RB, Cather JC, Sofen H, Poulin Y, Lebwohl M, et al. Impact of ixekizumab treatment on skin-related personal relationship difficulties in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients: 12-week results from two Phase 3 trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(11):1867-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14377

9. Korman NJ, Sofen H, Fretzin S, Rich P, Zhao Y, Herrera V, et al. Secukinumab provides better relief from the impact of psoriasis on daily activities and personal relationships than etanercept: results of two phase 3 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28(5):384-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546364.2016.1255306

10. Ryan C, Guenther L, Foley P, Weisman J, Burge R, Gallo G, et al. Ixekizumab provides persistent improvements in health-related quality of life and the sexual impact associated with moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis in adult patients during a 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(4):e277-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17836

11. Sotiriou E, Bakirtzi K, Papadimitriou I, Tsentemeidou A, Efty-chidou P, Eleftheriadis V, et al. A head-to-head comparison of risankizumab and ixekizumab for genital psoriasis: a real-life, 24-week, prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(5):e359-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17880

12. Licata G, Danzuso GCL, Fiorella C, Palazzo G, Calzavara-Pinton P, Argenziano G, et al. Efficacy, safety and patient's satisfaction for treatment of genital psoriasis with tildrakizumab: a case series and review of literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(11):e916-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18368

13. Gündüz A, Topçuoğlu V, Usta Gündüz EB, Ergun T, Genç-osmanoğlu DS, Sungur MZ. Significant effects of body image on sexual functions and satisfaction in psoriasis patients. J Sex Marital Ther. 2020;46(2):160-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2019.1654582

14. Nusbaum MRH, Singh AR, Pyles AA. Sexual healthcare needs of women aged 65 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(1):117-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52020.x

15. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O'Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ. A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):762-74. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067423

16. Molina-Leyva A, Almodovar-Real A, Ruiz-Carrascosa JC, Naranjo-Sintes R, Serrano-Ortega S, Jimenez-Moleon JJ. Distribution pattern of psoriasis affects sexual function in moderate to severe psoriasis: a prospective case series study. J Sex Med. 2014;11(12):2882-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12710

17. Alariny AF, Farid CI, Elweshahi HM, Abbood SS. Psychological and sexual consequences of psoriasis vulgaris on patients and their partners. J Sex Med. 2019;16(12):1900-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.017

18. Sorour F, Abdelmoaty A, Bahary MH, El Birqdar B. Psychiatric disorders associated with some chronic dermatologic diseases among a group of Egyptian dermatology outpatient clinic attendants. Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society. 2017;14(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ewx.0000503397.22746.bd

19. Maaty ASHA, Gomaa AHA, Mohammed GFA, Youssef IM, Eyada MMK. Assessment of female sexual function in patients with psoriasis. J Sex Med. 2013;10(6):1545-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12119

20. Cohen BE, Martires KJ, Ho RS. Psoriasis and the risk of depression in the US population: national health and nutrition examination survey 2009-2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(1):73-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3605

21. Basson R. Human sexual response. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;130:11-8.

22. Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Psoriasis and sex: a study of moderately to severely affected patients. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36(4):259-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00032.x

23. Sampogna F, Abeni D, Gieler U, Tomas-Aragones L, Lien L, Titeca G, et al. Impairment of sexual life in 3, 485 dermatological outpatients from a multicentre study in 13 European countries. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(4):478-82. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2561

24. Martínez-García E, Arias-Santiago S, Valenzuela-Salas I, Garrido-Colmenero C, García-Mellado V, Buendía-Eisman A. Quality of life in persons living with psoriasis patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):302-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.039

25. Ongenae K, Beelaert L, van Geel N, Naeyaert J.-M. Psycho-social effects of vitiligo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01369.x

26. Nusbaum MRH, Gamble GR, Pathman DE. Seeking medical help for sexual concerns: frequency, barriers, and missed opportunities. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:706.

27. Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E. General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(11):2093-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.025

28. Ribeiro S, Alarcão V, Simões R, Miranda FL, Carreira M, Galvão-Teles A. General practitioners' procedures for sexual history taking and treating sexual dysfunction in primary care. J Sex Med. 2014;11(2):386-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12395

29. Scanavino MdeT. Sexual dysfunctions of HIV-positive men: associated factors, pathophysiology issues, and clinical management. Adv Urol. 2011;2011:854792-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/854792

30. Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, Chen X, Yu R, Yu X. Association between psoriasis and erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2018;15(6):839-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.630

31. Larsabal M, Ly S, Sbidian E, Moyal-Barracco M, Dauendorffer J, Dupin N, et al. GENIPSO: a French prospective study assessing instantaneous prevalence, clinical features and impact on quality of life of genital psoriasis among patients consulting for psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(3):647-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17147

32. Meeuwis KaP, de Hullu JA, van de Nieuwenhof HP, Evers A, Massuger L, van de Kerkhof P, et al. Quality of life and sexual health in patients with genital psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 164(6):1247-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10249.x

## SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

**How to cite this article:** Salle R, Halioua B, Le Fur G, Aubert R, Shourick J, Taieb C. Psoriasis and sexuality: patients express their feelings. Skin Health Dis. 2023;3(3):e199. https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.199