# Conditional and Reversible Activation of Class A and B G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Tethered Pharmacology

Tom Podewin, Julia Ast, Johannes Broichhagen, Nicholas H F Fine, Daniela Nasteska, Philipp Leippe, Manuel Gailer, Teresa Buenaventura, Nisha Kanda, Ben J Jones, et al.

► To cite this version:

Tom Podewin, Julia Ast, Johannes Broichhagen, Nicholas H F Fine, Daniela Nasteska, et al. Conditional and Reversible Activation of Class A and B G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Tethered Pharmacology. ACS Central Science, 2018, 4 (2), pp.166-179. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00237. hal-03572718

HAL Id: hal-03572718

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03572718

Submitted on 14 Feb 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Cite This: ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 166–179

# Conditional and Reversible Activation of Class A and B G Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Tethered Pharmacology

Tom Podewin,†,○,# Julia Ast,‡,∇,# Johannes Broichhagen,†,○,#¶ Nicholas H. F. Fine,‡,∇

Daniela Nasteska,‡,∇ Philipp Leippe,† Manuel Gailer,† Teresa Buenaventura,§ Nisha Kanda,§ Ben J. Jones,⊥

Celine M'Kadmi,∥ Jean-Louis Baneres,∥ Jacky Marie,∥ Alejandra Tomas,§ Dirk Trauner,*†,●,∥

Anja Hoffmann-Röder,*† and David J. Hodson*‡,∥,¶

†Department of Chemistry and Center for Integrated Protein Science, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany

‡Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom

∇Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom, and
COMPARE University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham Midlands

§Section of Cell Biology and Functional Genomics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

⊥Section of Investigative Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

∥Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247 CNRS-Université Montpellier-ENSCM, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15 Avenue Charles Flahault, BP 14491, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 05, France

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Supporting Information

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**ABSTRACT:** Understanding the activation and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) using conditional approaches is paramount to developing new therapeutic strategies. Here, we describe the design, synthesis, and testing of **ExONatide**, a benzylguanine-linked peptide agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a class B GPCR required for maintenance of glucose levels in humans. **ExONatide** covalently binds to SNAP-tagged GLP-1R-expressing cells, leading to prolonged cAMP generation, $Ca^{2+}$ rises, and intracellular retention of the receptor. These effects were readily switched OFF following cleavage of the introduced disulfide bridge using the cell-permeable reducing agent *beta*-mercaptoethanol (BME). A similar approach could be extended to a class A GPCR using **GhrelON**, a benzylguanine-linked peptide agonist of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a), which is involved in food intake and growth. Thus, **ExONatide** and **GhrelON** allow SNAP-tag-directed activation of class A and B GPCRs involved in gut hormone signaling in a reversible manner. This tactic, termed *reductively cleavable agONist* (RECON), may be useful for understanding GLP-1R and GHS-R1a function both *in vitro* and *in vivo*, with applicability across GPCRs.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

## INTRODUCTION

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce information encoded by external stimuli into an appropriate cell output and as such play a key role in organismal homeostasis.¹ For this reason, GPCRs are important drug targets, yet many facets of their function remain enigmatic, including how they dynamically signal in space and time. Selectively targeting and interrogating GPCRs is therefore important for understanding their function.

Tethered pharmacology describes the linkage of pharmaco-
phores in close proximity to their targets often but not necessarily
in combination with recombinant engineering. By means of
covalent or noncovalent high affinity binding, this approach
allows the precise control of biological function as usually
achieved by genetics, but with the speed of pharmacology.² Self-

Received: June 2, 2017

Published: January 16, 2018

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Logic and synthesis of ExONatide. (a) Crystal structure of the activated GLP-1R in complex with GLP-1 (pdb: 5VAI)⁷⁴ and SNAP-tag (pdb: 3L00) resemble the molecular dimensions and design of the present study. (b) Schematic showing the reductively cleavable agONist (RECON) concept: after covalent labeling of a SNAP-tag with ExONatide, the GLP-1R can be activated, leading to Ca²⁺ and cAMP rises together with internalization and trafficking, which can readily be terminated by reductive cleavage using beta-mercaptoethanol (BME). (c) The cleavable disulfide bridge of ExONatide is formed through reaction of BG-PEG₄-SSpy with S39C-Ex4.</figcaption></figure>

labeling proteins (e.g., SNAP-, CLIP-, and Halo-tag)³ have facilitated tethered pharmacology, since they can be conditionally expressed and covalently bind molecules possessing the relevant bioconjugation handle with high selectivity and enzymatic kinetics.⁴,⁵ Moreover, these enzymes can be fused onto a variety of proteins.⁶,⁷ The SNAP-tag is ideal for targeting GPCRs, as it retains its activity to covalently bind molecules possessing an O⁶-benzylguanine (BG) when expressed both *in vitro* and *in vivo*,⁴,⁵ and many well-characterized SNAP_GPCR fusions exist compared to other enzyme self-labels. For instance, the SNAP-tag is the basis for photoswitchable orthogonal remotely tethered ligands (PORTLs) for class C GPCRs,²,⁸,⁹ while the Halo-tag was anchored to the membrane for the drugs acutely restricted by tethering (DART) concept.¹⁰ However, PORTLs incorporate an isomerization step for light-controlled ON/OFF responses, as shown for the metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 *in vivo*,¹¹ leaving ligand attached and thus limiting investigation of receptor trafficking and surface versus internalized populations. On the other hand, DART is irreversible and does not allow a 1:1 ligand/receptor ratio, albeit the studies were performed both *in vitro* and *in vivo* and encompassed an ionotropic as well as a metabotropic receptor. Other approaches, such as bio-orthogonal ligand tethering (BOLT)¹² and photoswitchable tethered ligands (PTLs),¹³ respectively rely on incorporating unnatural amino acids or cysteines into proteins. However, their use is limited by the requirement for site-directed mutagenesis to identify active mutants or by their inherent reactivity. We therefore reasoned that a self-labeling protein-tag bearing a cleavable linker would set the stage for studying conditional, prolonged, and reversible activation of GPCRs.

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an excellent candidate for the further development of tethered pharmacology, since it is a blockbuster drug target for type 2 diabetes treatment.¹⁴ Following ligand binding, this class B GPCR primarily activates adenyllyl cyclase through Gs, leading to 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation¹⁵⁻¹⁷ and intracellular Ca²⁺ fluxes.¹⁸⁻²⁰ These signaling processes are terminated by postendocytotic receptor trafficking, where the GLP-1R is internalized into endosomes, followed by either lysosomal degradation or endosomal recycling to the plasma membrane.²¹ However, recent reports suggest that GPCR signaling continues following receptor internalization into endosomes via cytosolic cAMP generation.²²⁻²⁴ How internalization and subsequent trafficking influence GLP-1R function is poorly understood.²⁵ Lastly, the GLP-1R is expressed throughout the body and displays pleiotropic activity including effects on glucose levels, locomotion, food intake, blood pressure, and inflammation.¹⁴,²⁶⁻²⁸ Despite this, the contribution of GLP-1R activation within discrete body compartments and tissues has so far relied upon Glp1r⁻/⁻ animals.²⁹⁻³¹ Key to better understanding GLP-1R, and more broadly GPCR function, is the development of tools that allow reversible receptor activation in a highly conditional manner.

Herein, we describe the development and testing of ExONatide (Figure 1), a benzylguanine-linked and disulfide bridge-containing incretin-mimetic based upon exenatide (Byetta). ExONatide specifically labels and activates SNAP_GLP-1R, a binary response that can be switched OFF by the simple addition of reducing agent to cleave the ligand (Figure 1a,b). Using GhrelON, we also extend the concept to the growth hormone secretagogue-receptor 1a (GHS-R1a), a class A GPCR. Following fasting, ghrelin released from the stomach
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** ExONatide signaling and binding. (a) ExONatide, S39C-Ex4 and Ex4(1–39) cAMP concentration–responses in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells (n = 3 assays in triplicate). (b) ExONatide concentration–response curves are similar with and without the SNAP-tag (n = 3 assays in triplicate). (c) Preincubation with increasing concentrations of ExONatide exponentially decreases BG-TMR binding/fluorescence compared to Ex4(1–39) in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells (n = 177–448 cells). (d) ExONatide (1–10 µM) decreases BG-TMR binding/fluorescence in AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells (n = 137–176 cells). (e and f) Representative images showing BG-TMR fluorescence in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells preincubated with and without a high concentration (1 µM) of ExONatide or Ex4(1–39) (scale bar = 33 µm). (g) Representative images showing BG-TMR fluorescence in AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells preincubated with and without a high concentration (10 µM) of ExONatide (scale bar = 33 µm). Values are the mean ± SEM.</figcaption></figure>

binds and activates GHS-R1a in neurons located in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, as well as pituitary somatotropes, leading to orexigenic (feeding) responses and growth hormone secretion.³²⁻³⁴ As such, ExONatide and GhrelON provide the blueprint for reductively cleavable agONist (RECON) peptides and set the scene for conditionally targeting GPCRs both *in vitro* and *in vivo*.

## RESULTS

**Design and Synthesis of ExONatide.** As shown by X-ray crystal structures, incretin-mimetic peptides with agonistic activity such as exenatide (Byetta; also known as exendin-4 or Ex4(1–39)) bind to the GLP-1R with their C-terminus solvent exposed.³⁵,³⁶ We therefore set out to derivatize Ex4(1–39) by mutating and synthesizing the S39C-Ex4 variant by means of solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) to install a free cysteine bioconjugation handle at the C-terminus. Linking BG-NH₂ to a PEG₄ spacer containing a pyridyl-activated disulfide from commercially available substrates, and by reacting this with S39C-Ex4, ExONatide was obtained in high purity on the milligram scale (see *Supporting Information* for details on synthesis and characterization) (Figure 1c). ExONatide therefore comprises a SNAP-tag reactive BG linked to a GLP-1R agonist via a reductively cleavable disulfide-containing PEG₄ chain.

**ExONatide Activates and Labels SNAP_GLP-1R.** Ex4(1–39) was able to increase intracellular cAMP concentrations with an EC₅₀ (30 min) = 17.9 ± 1.2 pM in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells, as assessed using LANCE TR-FRET-based assays (Figure 2a). By contrast, cAMP concentration–responses to ExONatide were right-shifted (EC₅₀ (30 min) = 95.2 ± 8.2 pM), with similar results seen in AD293-GLP-1R_GFP cells lacking the SNAP-tag (Figure 2a,b). Suggesting that single amino acid substitutions at the solvent exposed C-terminus of the peptide may have an effect on potency, the EC₅₀ values for the S39C-Ex4 precursor (EC₅₀ (30 min) = 98.8 ± 5.5 pM) and ExONatide were almost identical (Figure 2a). Nonetheless, maximal cAMP responses were near 100% (vs 5 µM forskolin) for all compounds tested, implying full agonism (Figure 2a).

SNAP-tag labeling efficiency was determined by preincubating YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells with ExONatide for 30 min before washing and adding BG-TMR, a fast cell-permeable SNAP-labeling fluorophore. Increasing concentrations of ExONatide exponentially reduced BG-TMR intensity with a half-maximal binding concentration (EC₅₀ (30 min) = 32.1 ± 22.7 nM) suggestive of near-quantitative SNAP-tag labeling at the membrane (Figures 2c,e, S1, S2a). Labeling reached 70–80%, which may reflect internalization of 20–30% GLP-1R at the time of application of ExONatide, which is non-cell permeable compared to BG-TMR, or alternatively 20–30% loss of internalized receptor due to degradation at high ExONatide concentrations.²³,³⁷ Supporting the latter, a 20–30% decrease in BG-TMR fluorescence was also seen following incubation of YFP-AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells with high concentrations (>1 µM) of Ex4(1–39) (Figure 2c,f). ExONatide was similarly able to label AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells (Figure 2d,g),
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** ExONatide leads to prolonged Ca²⁺ and cAMP signaling. (a) ExONatide induces Ca²⁺ rises in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells similarly to Ex4(1–39), but this cannot be washed out with buffer (mean ± SEM traces shown) (gray shaded area T1-T3 = analysis time window) (n = 29–34 cells). (b) Application of beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) for 5 min immediately prior to washout allows Ca²⁺ responses to ExONatide to be subsequently reduced (mean ± SEM traces shown) (gray shaded area T4–T6 = analysis time window) (n = 34 cells). (c) Representative images showing Ca²⁺ responses to ExONatide in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells before (T4), during (T5) and after (T6) application of BME. (d) Bar graph showing amplitude of Ca²⁺ responses to Ex4(1–39) and ExONatide before and after washout ± BME (n = 29–34 cells) (T1-T6 relate to time windows shown in a and b). (e) Box and whiskers plot showing that ExONatide-stimulated insulin secretion can only be washed out following application of BME (n = 8 wells) (Ex4(1–39)-alone was used as a positive control) (G11; 11 mM glucose). (f) As for (a), but FRET assays for intracellular cAMP 15 min following application of ligand or washout (n = 40–71 cells). (g) Representative images showing FRET responses to ExONatide in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells before and after application of BME. (h) BME was unable to significantly induce apoptosis over 60 min, as determined using immunostaining for cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) (overnight incubation serves as the positive control) (n = 3 experiments). **P < 0.01 and NS, nonsignificant, as indicated or vs control; Student's t test, one-way ANOVA (with Bonferroni's or Tukey's posthoc test) or Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn's multiple comparison test). ExONatide and Ex4(1–39) were applied at 800 nM and 10 nM, respectively. BME was applied at 10 mM. Values are the mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated.</figcaption></figure>

although labeling strength was reduced, probably due to loss of
the orthosteric site that may contribute to affinity labeling (58.8
± 2.6 vs 37.0 ± 1.5% binding, SNAP_GLP-1R vs SNAP_
mGluR2_GFP cells, respectively; 1 µM ExONatide; *P* < 0.01,
Student's *t* test). No binding was detected in YFP-only

transfected cells, as expected for the SNAP-tag specific BG-
compound (Figure S2b). On the basis of the SNAP-tag labeling
efficiency, ExONatide was used at a concentration of 800 nM for
all subsequent cell biology experiments.
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Reversible GLP-1R internalization by **ExONatide**. (a) Representative images showing that application of the agonist Ex4(1–39) to MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells at high glucose concentration (11 mM; G11) induces GLP-1R internalization, which can be partially reversed with the antagonist Ex4(9–39) (G3; 3 mM glucose) (scale bar = 10 µm). (b) As for (a), but following application of **ExONatide**. Note that GLP-1R internalization can only be reversed by Ex4(9–39) following application of *beta*-mercaptoethanol (BME). (c) Surface GLP-1R expression is significantly reduced following application of Ex4(1–39), and this is reversed by application of Ex4(9–39). (d) Surface GLP-1R expression in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells is significantly reduced following application of **ExONatide**, but this is not reversed by application of Ex4(9–39). (e) As for (d), but showing plasma membrane recycling of GLP-1R following treatment with BME. (f) **ExONatide**-internalized GLP-1R in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells partially colocalizes with early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) (top panels), and this is maintained in the presence of Ex4(9–39) (scale bar = 10 µm). **P** < 0.01 and NS, nonsignificant vs G3 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc test). In (c) and (d), samples were run in parallel, hence the same control value (n = 3–7 experiments). **ExONatide**, Ex4(1–39), and Ex4(9–39) were applied at 800 nM, 10 nM, and 10 µM, respectively. BME was applied at 10 mM. Values are the mean ± SEM.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** GhrelinON structure, signaling, and binding. (a) Structure of GhrelinON showing the cleavable disulfide bridge and PEG-linker. (b) GhrelinGGCG and GhrelinON display minimal loss of binding affinity for the GHS-R1a, as measured using specific Tag-lite competition assay (n = 2 assays in triplicate). (c) Ghrelin, ghrelinGGCG, and GhrelinON demonstrate similar potencies for IP-1 generation (n = 2 assays in triplicate). (d) Preincubation of YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells with GhrelinON decreases BG-TMR binding/fluorescence intensity compared to native ghrelin (n = 230–385 cells). (e) GhrelinON decreases BG-TMR binding/fluorescence in AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells (n = 338–435 cells). (f and g) Representative images showing BG-TMR fluorescence in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells preincubated with and without a high concentration (1 µM) of GhrelinON or ghrelin (scale bar = 33 µm). (h) As for (f) but AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells treated with or without 10 µM GhrelinON. Values are the mean ± SEM.</figcaption></figure>

**ExONatide Does Not Induce GLP-1R Biased Signaling.**

Biased signaling exists when different agonists selectively engage different signaling pathways via the same receptor. Several GLP-1R agonists engender bias between G-protein signaling (measured as cAMP production) and β-arrestin-dependent phosphorylation of ERK1/2.<sup>38</sup> To determine whether ExONatide is a biased GLP-1R agonist, we measured signaling responses using CHO-K1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells together with the intramolecular FRET reporters T<sup>Epac</sup><sup>vv39</sup> and cytoplasmic EKAR,<sup>40</sup> which respectively measure intracellular cAMP production and ERK1/2 activation via conformational changes in proximity between CFP and YFP derivatives. Ratiometric

changes in fluorescence were apparent on stimulation with Ex4(1–39), S39C-Ex4, and ExONatide at nanomolar concentrations (Figure S3a,b), and concentration-response curves for each pathway were obtained (Figure S3c,d). As all compounds were full agonists in each pathway, relative potency ratios (ΔΔLogEC<sub>50</sub>) were used to calculate bias.<sup>41</sup> Relative to Ex4(1–39), neither S39C-Ex4 nor ExONatide exhibited bias between cAMP and ERK signaling, as determined with sequential measurements over 30 min to avoid kinetic artifacts (Figure S3e).<sup>42</sup>

**ExONatide Induces Conditional and Prolonged GLP-1R Signaling in Beta Cells.**

We next sought to investigate whether
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** GhrelON reversibly activates and internalizes the GHS-R1a. (a) Both ghrelin and GhrelON induce large increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ concentrations in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a, although washout of ligand only restores baseline Ca²⁺ levels for ghrelin (mean ± SEM traces shown) (gray shaded area T1–T3 = analysis time window) (n = 27–54 cells). (b) Application of beta-mercaptoethanol (BME) for 5 min immediately prior to washout reduces Ca²⁺ responses to GhrelON to baseline levels (mean ± SEM traces shown) (gray shaded area T4–T6 = analysis time window) (n = 27–54 cells). (c) Bar graph showing amplitude of Ca²⁺ responses to ghrelin and GhrelON before and after washout ± BME (n = 27–54 cells) (T1–T6 relate to time windows shown in a and b). (d) Treatment of YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells with ghrelin for 1 h leads to GHS-R1a internalization, which can be partially reversed following washout and incubation for a further 3 h. GhrelON exerts similar effects, but these can only be washed out following prior application of BME for 10 min (n = 10–12 images from two experiments). (e) Representative images showing that ghrelin reduces surface GHS-R1a expression (detected via the FLAG-tag), which is reversed by a wash step (scale bar = 33 µm). (f) As for (e), but showing that plasma membrane GHS-R1a recycling can only be achieved by application of BME to GhrelON-treated YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells. **P** < 0.01 and NS, nonsignificant, as indicated; Student's t test or one-way ANOVA (with Bonferroni's posthoc test). Ghrelin and GhrelON were applied at 100 nM and 800 nM, respectively. BME was applied at 10 mM. Values are the mean ± SEM.</figcaption></figure>
**ExONatide** would activate GLP-1R signaling in a physiologically more relevant system, i.e., in MIN6 beta cells. This was done by following GLP-1-induced Ca²⁺ fluxes using confocal microscopy. Both Ex4(1–39) and **ExONatide** induced large cytosolic Ca²⁺ rises in Fluo8-loaded MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells (Figure 3a–d). While resting baseline Ca²⁺ levels could be restored following a washout period for Ex4(1–39), this was not the case for **ExONatide** where Ca²⁺ remained significantly elevated (Figure 3a–d). However, addition of *beta*-mercaptoethanol (BME) for 5 min immediately before washout allowed Ca²⁺ responses to **ExONatide** to be reduced (Figure 3b–d). In line with [Ca²⁺]ᵢ measurements, **ExONatide** stimulated insulin secretion similarly to Ex4(1–39), although this could only be halted following reductive cleavage and washout of compound (Figure 3e).

Similar results were observed using the FRET-based biosensor Epac2-camps.⁴³ While **ExONatide** induced an increase in cAMP, which could be partially washed out in the absence of reducing agent, baseline cAMP levels were only achieved following prior application of BME for 10 min. We note that MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells endogenously express GLP-1R that may give rise to background adenylyl cyclase activity, although this did not appear to be a major issue, since cAMP responses to **ExONatide** were reduced to control levels by BME (Figure 3f,g). An effect of reducing agent *per se* is unlikely, as Ca²⁺ responses to Ex4(1–39) were unaffected by BME (Figure 3b–d). Moreover, BME did not influence insulin secretion at 11 mM *d*-glucose (Figure 3e), or cAMP responses to Ex4(1–39) (Figure 3f). Together, these data provide evidence for reversible signaling through the two main GLP-1R activation pathways in pancreatic beta cells.

BME was used for reductive cleavage, since it is cell permeable and the GLP-1R undergoes internalization following activation.³⁷ While BME may conceivably induce toxicity and loss of function through modification of cell proteins including the receptor itself, this did not seem to be an issue in the present studies. Even following 60 min incubation with 10 mM BME, cells did not display significant signs of necrosis (Figure S4a) or apoptosis (Figure 3h), although cleaved caspase 3 was significantly upregulated after overnight exposure (Figure 3h). Furthermore, MIN6 cells remained proliferative and viable in culture 2 days after 0–60 min exposure to BME, suggesting that reductive alterations to proteins are unlikely to influence cell phenotype over the long-term (Figure S4b,c). ATP responses to *d*-glucose were similar in control and BME-treated MIN6 cells, demonstrating normal metabolism (Figure S4d). Lastly, cAMP concentration–responses to Ex4(1–39), **ExONatide**, and S39C-Ex4 were all unaffected by 10 min preincubation with BME (Figure S5).

**ExONatide Allows Long-Lasting and Reversible GLP-1R Internalization.** Following agonist binding, the GLP-1R undergoes internalization before ligand removal and endosomal sorting, either for recycling back to the plasma membrane or lysosomal degradation.²³,²⁵ Receptor recycling is a highly regulated process, and receptors that cannot disengage ligands are expected to remain sequestered within the endosome. To examine the effects of constitutive activation on receptor internalization, MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells were treated with either Ex4(1–39) or **ExONatide** before immunohistochemistry for GLP-1R localization using a monoclonal antibody. Both Ex4(1–39) and **ExONatide** induced receptor internalization, as shown by a decrease in cell surface GLP-1R localization and an increase in punctate intracellular staining

(Figures 4a–d, S6). However, this was only reversed by the specific antagonist for Ex4(9–39), with no significant plasma membrane recycling detected for **ExONatide** (Figures 4a–d, S6). Supporting a role for SNAP-tag-binding in irreversible internalization, recycling of the GLP-1R to the plasma membrane was seen following addition of both BME and Ex4(9–39) (Figure 4b,e). As for Ca²⁺ and cAMP signaling, BME alone did not alter receptor internalization (Figure S7).

Following 1 h application of **ExONatide**, internalized GLP-1R showed partial (~50%) colocalization with early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1), which is broadly in line with that previously reported at the same time point.³⁷ Pertinently, this association was maintained even in the presence of Ex4(9–39) after 3 h (Figure 4f). Not all early endosomes were GLP-1R immunopositive (Figure 4f), however, indicating that either the receptor passes via EEA1+ endosomes before accessing other populations, or some EEA1+ endosomes no longer contain receptor at this stage.

**Design and Synthesis of GhrelON.** To demonstrate the broad applicability of our approach across class A and B GPCRs, we decided to install a bioconjugation handle on ghrelin, an orexigenic hormone involved in food intake and growth through GHS-R1a binding.³² By contrast to the convenient serine–cysteine substitution in S39C-Ex4 as the precursor for **ExONatide**, ghrelin comprises a C-terminal arginine that is highly conserved throughout mammalian ghrelin peptides.⁴⁴ As the N-terminus is crucial for ghrelin potency and specificity, with the N-terminal pentapeptide GSS(C8:0)FL being the minimal fragment equipotent to ghrelin,⁴⁵ we decided to retain the full-length sequence extended by a GGCG fragment. The benzyl guanine moiety was then merged with the ghrelinGGCG peptide by formation of a disulfide bond with BG-PEG₄-SSpy. By using the same strategy and chemical building blocks as for **ExONatide**, we obtained **GrehlON** on the milligram scale (see Supporting Information for details on synthesis and characterization) (Figure 5a).

**GhrelON Activates and Labels SNAP_GHS-R1a.** Ghrelin binds the GHS-R1a with high affinity ($K_i$ = 1.8 ± 0.3 nM), measured using HTRF-based competition assays (Figure 5b). **GhrelON** showed a small loss in binding affinity at the GHS-R1a ($K_i$ = 6.1 ± 0.6 nM), which may be related to modification of the C-terminus to accept the bioconjugation handle (ghrelinGGCG also showed decreased binding affinity) ($K_i$ = 19.6 ± 8.1 nM) (Figure 5b). Similar results were seen for IP-1 accumulation, with a small loss in potency detected for **GhrelON** ($EC_{50}$ = 5.5 ± 0.5 nM) and ghrelinGGCG ($EC_{50}$ = 11.15 ± 0.4 nM) versus ghrelin ($EC_{50}$ = 3.2 ± 0.8 nM) (Figure 5c). **GhrelON** labeled the SNAP_GHS-R1a with almost equal efficiency (Figure 5d,f,g) to that detected with **ExONatide** and the SNAP_GLP-1R. While 100% labeling was not reached, again this probably reflected a reduction in the number of cell-surface receptors available for peptide labeling due to GHS-R1a internalization in the absence of ligand (Figure 5d).⁴⁶ Indicating the presence of affinity labeling, SNAP-tag binding was also reduced in AD293-SNAP_mGluR2_GFP cells lacking the orthosteric site for ghrelin (Figure 5e,h).

**GhrelON Allows Prolonged but Reversible GHS-R1a Activation and Internalization.** Both ghrelin and **GhrelON** induced large and sustained increases in cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ levels in YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells, most likely through IP₃-dependent liberation of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores (Figure 6a).³²,⁴⁷ Whereas Ca²⁺ responses to ghrelin could be completely reversed following washout (Figure 6a,c), those of **GhrelON**
were more persistent, showing an approximately 50% decrease (Figure 6a,c). Prior incubation with BME for 5 min before washout allowed Ca²⁺ levels to be subsequently restored to baseline levels in GhRELON-treated YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells (Figure 6b,c). To examine receptor trafficking, YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells were treated with ghrelin or GhRELON for 1 h before FLAG-immunostaining for the SNAP_GHS-R1a. Ghrelin induced GHS-R1a internalization (Figure 6d,e), with recycling back to the cell surface evident 3 h after agonist washout (Figure 6d,e). While GhRELON also induced GHS-R1a internalization (Figure 6d,f), this was only reversed following application of BME for 10 min before the wash step (Figure 6d,f). Treatment with BME for 10 min before application of ghrelin did not influence GHS-R1a internalization (Figure S8).

## ■ DISCUSSION

In the present study, we describe an incretin-mimetic termed ExONatide that allows tethered activation and internalization of the GLP-1R, a class B GPCR, when N-terminally fused to a SNAP-tag. We also show that this technology is applicable to a class A GPCR using GhRELON, which targets the SNAP-tagged GHS-R1a. In both cases, use of a disulfide bridge allows the reductive release of ligand and resumption of normal signaling processes, an approach called RECON. Thus, we further develop tethered pharmacology by using peptide ligands of class A and B GPCRs involved in the regulation of metabolism.

Prolonged activation of GPCRs has been described previously by means of cloning activating peptides onto the N-termini⁴⁸,⁴⁹ or by coexpression of membrane-anchored peptides for probing ion channel or GPCR function.⁵⁰,⁵¹ However, using a SNAP-tagged receptor in conjunction with a BG-linked ligand bears several advantages: (i) the ligand/receptor ratio is defined as 1:1 in terms of binding and potency; (ii) local concentration with a PEG₄ chain can be considered high¹⁰,⁵² and does not rely on membrane fluctuations; (iii) preactivation during expression and culture is absent; (iv) disturbances in vitro and in vivo are limited solely by SNAP-tag fusion; (v) it is bidirectional and can be switched ON and OFF in a binary fashion by virtue of the incorporated cleavage site; (vi) ligand can be freed from covalent tethering, allowing the study of normal trafficking processes mediated by orthosteric binding; and (vii) receptor subtypes can potentially be targeted.

RECON compares favorably to other tethered approaches, such as PORTL and DART,⁸⁻¹⁰ and provides two major advances: a chemically cleavable tether and a peptidic drug. However, PORTL and DART still possess distinct advantages including spatiotemporally precise photoswitching or proven efficacy in vivo, the latter allowing investigation of behavioral neuropharmacology.¹⁰ Thus, future studies will seek to use RECON as a platform to introduce these aspects, for example, via photoswitch incorporation, targeting ion channels, or intracellular proteins and in vivo testing.

Suggesting that the modifications required for tethering are well-tolerated, the potency of ExONatide and GhRELON for cAMP and IP-1 generation was only reduced 1 order of magnitude compared to native Ex4(1–39) and ghrelin, respectively. This may be due to the amino acid substitutions, since a similar loss of potency was detected for both the S39C variant of Ex4(1–39) and ghrelinGGCG. It can be assumed that further derivatization at this position to obtain the highly modified ExONatide or GhRELON would lower potency even more, but that any loss may be offset by covalent attachment at

the receptor. Importantly, the ligand concentration required for orthosteric activation was much less than that required for full SNAP-tag labeling (pM versus µM), meaning that ExONatide and GhRELON bound to SNAP_GLP-1R and SNAP_GHS-R1a fusions are always active.

The AD293-SNAP_GLP-1R cells used in the present study likely represent an amplified system, since the EC₅₀ values were in the pM range. While this makes calculation of the Eₘₐₓ difficult, ExONatide is still able to drive cAMP/Ca²⁺ rises and insulin release in MIN6 cells despite an apparently lowered EC₅₀ versus Ex4(1–39). Moreover, the EC₅₀ for ExONatide was similar in CHO cells stably expressing SNAP_GLP-1R and the high dynamic range FRET sensor ¹Epac<sup>vw</sup>. Suggesting that activation of the GLP-1R may occur in a cooperative manner, the Hill coefficient for cAMP generation by ExONatide was 1.42 ± 0.16 (1.25 ± 0.07 for S39C-Ex4).

ExONatide induced long-lasting GLP-1R redistribution to the endosomal compartment that could only be reversed following addition of a cell-permeable reducing agent. Although SNAP-labeled fluorophores with cell surface-restricted disulfide cleavage sites have been reported,⁵³ they still rely on receptor activation by a native ligand. By contrast, ExONatide provides a physiological relevant tool for probing how class B GPCRs signal within organelles (e.g., endosomes), as well as how alterations in kinetics may influence second messenger recruitment (i.e., signal bias), all based upon intracellular manipulation. Indeed, ExONatide, Ex4(1–39) and S39C-Ex4 displayed similar EC₅₀'s for cAMP and ERK, suggesting that (i) differences in agonist behavior are unlikely to be due to signal bias in the context of transmembrane versus intracellular activation; and (ii) GLP-1R internalization induced by ExONatide likely reflects signaling duration rather than intensity.

GLP-1R and GHS-R1a signaling have broad-ranging physiological functions. While conditional knockout mouse models exist,⁵⁴ methods for selectively activating the receptors with ligands are lacking. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has, however, allowed the generation of epitope-tagged mice,⁵⁵ and expressing endogenous SNAP-fusion proteins in rodents can be envisioned. Accordingly, ExONatide and GhRELON in combination with SNAP_GLP-1R or SNAP_GHS-R1a animals may provide a powerful platform for dissecting out the role of GLP-1R and GHS-R1a signaling in a cell-specific manner in vivo. The pharmacokinetics of ExONatide and GhRELON will need careful assessment before any in vivo workup, and noncleavable congeners lacking the disulfide bridge may be required to avoid reactivity with glutathione and other cysteine-containing proteins including serum albumin. However, recent studies have shown that disulfides are well-tolerated in vivo when incorporated into ligands as a backbone for cell-selective dual agonists.⁵⁶ As an alternative to BME, which may be difficult to administer to an animal at high doses without apparent toxicity, the disulfide bridge can be cleaved by different modes of action in vivo, e.g., by reduced lipoic acid or harsh UV-C light.⁵⁷ Furthermore, other approaches to “uncage” molecules, for instance, by using Pd-chemistry⁵⁸ or bioorthogonal click and release reactions⁵⁹⁻⁶¹ have been reported, and these molecular scaffolds may replace the disulfide bond in the future as options for in vivo application.

Compared to other pharmacological approaches, the RECON system affords unique opportunities in terms of understanding GPCR function in vitro: (i) endogenous GPCR signaling can be activated in a specific cell population within a complex tissue (e.g., catecholaminergic GLP-1R-expressing neurons in brain slices⁶²); (ii) receptors with closely related ligands can be
Relative potencies (ΔLogEC₅₀) were obtained by subtracting LogEC₅₀ values for S39C-Ex4 and ExONatide from that of the reference agonist Ex4 in each assay at each interpolated time point. Bias (ΔΔLogEC₅₀) was then determined by subtracting the relative potency of each test agonist in each pathway. As all agonists were tested for each pathway in parallel to reduce variability, bias was calculated on a per assay basis.

**Calcium Imaging.** MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R or YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells were loaded with the Ca²⁺ indicator Fluo8 (10 µM) for 30 min. Ca²⁺ imaging was performed using a Crest X-Light spinning disk head coupled to a Nikon Ti-E automated base and 10×/0.4 NA objective. Excitation was delivered at λ = 458–482 nm using a Lumencor Spectra X Light engine, and emitted signals were detected at λ = 500–550 nm using a Photometrics Evolve Delta 512 EMCCD. ExONatide, Ex4(1–39), GhrelON, or ghrelin were added to the imaging chamber for 15–20 min before washing the cells with buffer for 5 min ± BME. Recordings were then continued for a further 15 min. Intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]ᵢ) was determined as the mean at the time points indicated. For experiments with MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R, D-glucose was added at 11 mM, which is permissive for incretin action. HEPES-bicarbonate buffer was used, containing in mM: 120 NaCl, 4.8 KCl, 24 NaHCO₃, 0.5 Na₂HPO₄, 5 HEPES, 2.5 CaCl₂, 1.2 MgCl₂. For experiments with YFP-AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a, samples were maintained in normal culture medium. Intensity-overtime traces were extracted using a region of interest (ROI) and for comparison normalized as F/Fᵢmin where F = fluorescence at a given time point and Fᵢmin = minimum fluorescence.

**FRET Imaging.** cAMP generation in MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells was measured before and after washout of drug in the absence or presence of BME using the FRET probe Epac2-camps.⁶⁸ Following 10 min incubation, snapshots were captured using the Crest X-Light spinning disk system, and excitation was performed at λ = 430–450 nm. Emitted signals were detected at emission λ = 460–500 nm and λ = 520–550 nm for Cerulean and Citrine, respectively. Results were expressed as the ratio of Cerulean/Citrine. In all cases, HEPES-bicarbonate buffer was used.

**Insulin Secretion Assays.** MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells grown in 12-well plates were incubated with HEPES-bicarbonate buffer supplemented with 0.1% BSA and containing the indicated treatments for 30 min. For washout experiments, cells were treated with ExONatide, before washout with and without 10 mM BME for 10 min and reincubation with buffer for a further 30 min. Insulin concentration in the supernatant was assayed using a HTRF-based assay (Cisbio) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

**Apoptosis, Necrosis, and Proliferation Assay.** For quantification of apoptosis, MIN6 cells were incubated with 10 mM BME for the indicated times and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Immunostaining was performed using an antibody against Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3; 1:400; #9661, Cell Signaling Technology), before secondary goat antirabbit Alexa Fluor 633 (1:1000) and Hoechst 33342 staining. Cells were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope, with excitation delivered at λ = 405 nm and λ = 633 nm. Emitted signals were collected at λ = 410–550 nm and λ = 641–695 nm for Hoechst 33342 and Alexa Fluor 633, respectively. Total area was quantified using the threshold plugin for Fiji, and results were expressed as the ratio CC3/Hoechst, as described.⁶⁹

For quantification of necrosis, MIN6 cells were labeled with 5 µM calcein-AM and 5 µM propidium iodide for 30 min. Cells

were imaged in HEPES-bicarbonate buffer using the Crest X-Light spinning disk system, and excitation was performed at λ = 458–482 nm and λ = 543–558 nm for calcein and propidium iodide, respectively. Emitted signals were detected at λ = 500–550 nm and λ = 602–662 nm for calcein and propidium iodide, respectively. Total area was quantified using the threshold plugin for Fiji and expressed as the ratio propidium iodide/calcein, as described.⁷⁰

For quantification of proliferation, MIN6 cells were fixed and labeled with Hoechst 33342. Whole wells were imaged using the Crest X-Light spinning disk system, excitation performed at λ = 383–408 nm, and emitted signals were detected at λ = 435–485. Images were stitched together, and the total area was analyzed using the stitching and threshold plugins for Fiji, respectively.

**ATP Assay.** MIN6 cells were treated with 10 mM BME for 10 min at 37 °C followed by incubation with HEPES buffer containing 3 mM or 20 mM D-glucose for 30 min at 37 °C. ATP content was detected using the ATP determination kit (A22066; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a BMG PHERAstar microplate reader, as described.⁷¹

**GLP-1R Internalization Studies.** MIN6B1-SNAP_GLP-1R cells were incubated in HEPES-bicarbonate buffer supplemented with 3 mM D-glucose for 2 h at 37 °C and either fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde or further stimulated with 11 mM D-glucose (G11) containing 10 nM Ex-4(1–39) or 800 nM ExONatide for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were either fixed or washed extensively prior to incubation with 10 µM Ex-4(9–39) for a further 1 or 3 h following 0 or 10 min application of 10 mM BME. At the concentration used here, Ex4(9–39) is expected to effectively trap GLP-1R at the plasma membrane, allowing recycling to be quantified via reappearance of labeled receptor. Control experiments were performed using BME and Ex4(1–39)-alone. Immunostaining was performed using mouse antihuman GLP-1R (1:30; Mab 3F52; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and rabbit anti-EEA1 antibodies (1:50; sc-33585; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), before secondary antimouse AlexaFluor-488 staining and mounting on coverslips with Vectashield Hardset + DAPI. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM780 microscope and a 63x/1.4 NA oil objective. Excitation was delivered at λ = 405 nm and λ = 481 nm. Emitted signals were collected at λ = 410–495 nm and λ = 493–630 nm for DAPI and AlexaFluor-488, respectively. Surface signal was quantified on binarized images using the threshold plugin for ImageJ and expressed relative to the total signal.

**GHS-R1a Ligand Binding Assay.** Kᵢ values were determined from binding competition experiments performed on HEK293T-GHS-R1a cells using a homogenous time resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay (Cisbio), as previously described.⁷² Kᵢ values were calculated from binding curves.

**Inositol Phosphate Assay.** Inositol phosphate accumulation assays were conducted 48 h after transfection using HEK293T-GHS-R1a cells (50 000 cells/well of a 96-well plate). IP-1 production was measured using the IP-One HTRF kit, as previously described.⁷³ Values are expressed as ΔF where ΔF = (ratio 665 nm/620 nm assay – ratio 665 nm/620 nm negative control)/ratio 665 nm/620 nm negative control. The negative control, corresponding to the Lumi4-Tb blank, was used as an internal assay control. Inositol phosphate accumulation was expressed as the percentage of the maximal ghrelin response using the formula: (ΔF mock cells – ΔF receptor transfected cells)/(ΔF mock cells – ΔF maximal ghrelin stimulation for receptor transfected cells). The basal signal in the absence of any ligand stimulation corresponded to constitutive activity of GHS-
R1a (representing 70–75% of maximal stimulation promoted by
ghrelin).

**GHS-R1a Internalization Studies.** AD293-SNAP_GHS-R1a cells were incubated with 100 nM ghrelin or 800 nM GhrelON for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were either fixed or washed before incubation for a further 3 h following 0 or 10 min application of 10 mM BME. Immunostaining was performed using mouse anti-FLAG antibody (1:200; F1804; Sigma-Aldrich), before application of secondary antimouse Alexa-Fluor-568 and mounting on coverslips with Vectashield Hardset + DAPI. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM780 microscope and 63x/1.2 NA water objective. Excitation was delivered at $\lambda$ = 405 nm and $\lambda$ = 561. Emitted signals were collected at $\lambda$ = 410–585 nm and $\lambda$ = 568–691 nm, respectively. Surface/total signal was quantified as for the GLP-1R.

**Statistics.** Data normality was assessed using the D'Agostino-Pearson test. Nonmultifactorial comparisons were made using Student's t test. Multifactorial comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's or Tukey's posthoc tests, or if non-Gaussian, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's posthoc test. Log-transformed concentration-response curves were fitted using the Hill equation to allow calculation of EC₅₀ values. All analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software) and IgorPro 6.2. Results were considered significant at *P* < 0.05.

■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00237.

Chemistry and spectroscopy, synthesis, spectral data and
supporting figures related to ExONatide and GhrelON
(PDF)

■ AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

* (D.J.H.) E-mail: d.hodson@bham.ac.uk.

* (A.H.-R.) E-mail: anja.hoffmann-roeder@lmu.de.

* (D.T.) E-mail: dirktrauner@nyu.edu.

ORCID

Johannes Broichhagen: 0000-0003-3084-6595

Dirk Trauner: 0000-0002-6782-6056

David J. Hodson: 0000-0002-8641-8568

Present Addresses

○Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Department of
Chemical Biology, Jahnstr. 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

● New York University, Department of Chemistry, Silver Center for Arts and Science, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Author Contributions

T.P., J.A. and J.B. contributed equally.

Author Contributions

T.P., J.B., D.T., A.H.R., and D.J.H. conceived and designed the study. D.J.H., A.H.R., and D.T. jointly supervised the research. T.P., P.L. and M.G. performed synthesis. T.P., J.A., J.B., D.N., B.J.J., N.H.F.F., T.B., N.K., C.K., J-L.B., J.M., A.T., and D.J.H. performed the experiments. T.P., J.A., J.B., and D.J.H. wrote the paper with input from all the authors.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the SFB749 (T.P., M.G., and A.H.R.), the SFB TRR 152 (J.B. and D.T.), the SFB1032 (P.L. and D.T.), and the Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) (T.P., J.B., P.L., M.G., D.T., and A.H.R.). T.P. was supported by an EASD Albert-Renold Young Scientist Fellowship (94571). A.T. was supported by an MRC Project Grant (MR/M012646/1) and a Diabetes UK Early-Career Small Grant (16/0005441). D.J.H. was supported by Diabetes UK. R.D. Lawrence (12/0004431), EFSD/Novo Nordisk Rising Star and Birmingham Fellowships, a Wellcome Trust Institutional Support Award, and an MRC Project Grant (MR/N00275X/1). This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Starting Grant 715884 to D.J.H. and Advanced Grant 268795 to D.T.). MIN6B1 cells were provided by Prof. Philippe Halban (University of Geneva, Switzerland) with permission from Prof. Jun-ichi Miyazaki (University of Osaka) who produced the maternal MIN6 cell line.

■ REFERENCES

(1) Kobilka, B. K. G protein coupled receptor structure and activation. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr.* **2007**, *1768* (4), 794–807.

(2) Leippe, P.; Koehler Leman, J.; Trauner, D. Specificity and Speed: Tethered Photopharmacology. *Biochemistry* **2017**, *56* (39), 5214–5220.

(3) Xue, L.; Karpenko, I. A.; Hiblot, J.; Johnsson, K. Imaging and manipulating proteins in live cells through covalent labeling. *Nat. Chem. Biol.* **2015**, *11* (12), 917–923.

(4) Keppler, A.; Gendreizig, S.; Gronemeyer, T.; Pick, H.; Vogel, H.; Johnsson, K. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. *Nat. Biotechnol.* **2003**, *21* (1), 86–89.

(5) Yang, G., de Castro Reis, F.; Sundukova, M.; Pimpinella, S.; Asaro, A.; Castaldi, L.; Batti, L.; Bilbao, D.; Reymond, L.; Johnsson, K.; Heppenstall, P. A. Genetic targeting of chemical indicators in vivo. *Nat. Methods* **2015**, *12* (2), 137–139.

(6) Maurel, D.; Comps-Agrar, L.; Brock, C.; Rives, M. L.; Bourrier, E.; Ayoub, M. A.; Bazin, H.; Tinel, N.; Durroux, T.; Prezeau, L.; Trinquet, E.; Pin, J. P. Cell-surface protein-protein interaction analysis with time-resolved FRET and snap-tag technologies: application to GPCR oligomerization. *Nat. Methods* **2008**, *5* (6), 561–567.

(7) Scholler, P.; Moreno-Delgado, D.; Lecat-Guillet, N.; Doumazane, E.; Monnier, C.; Charrier-Savournin, F.; Fabre, L.; Chouvet, C.; Soldevila, S.; Lamarque, L.; Donsimoni, G.; Roux, T.; Zwier, J. M.; Trinquet, E.; Rondard, P.; Pin, J. P. HTS-compatible FRET-based conformational sensors clarify membrane receptor activation. *Nat. Chem. Biol.* **2017**, *13* (4), 372–380.

(8) Levitz, J.; Broichhagen, J.; Leippe, P.; Konrad, D.; Trauner, D.; Isacoff, E. Y. Dual optical control and mechanistic insights into photoswitchable group II and III metabotropic glutamate receptors. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **2017**, *114* (17), E3546–E3554.

(9) Broichhagen, J.; Damijonaitis, A.; Levitz, J.; Sokol, K. R.; Leippe, P.; Konrad, D.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Trauner, D. Orthogonal Optical Control of a G Protein-Coupled Receptor with a SNAP-Tethered Photochromic Ligand. ACS Cent. Sci. **2015**, *1* (7), 383–393.

(10) Shields, B. C.; Kahuno, E.; Kim, C.; Apostolides, P. F.; Brown, J.; Lindo, S.; Mensh, B. D.; Dudman, J. T.; Lavis, L. D.; Tadross, M. R. Deconstructing behavioral neuropharmacology with cellular specificity. *Science* **2017**, *356* (6333), eaaj2161.

(11) Berry, M. H.; Holt, A.; Levitz, J.; Broichhagen, J.; Gaub, B. M.; Visel, M.; Stanley, C.; Aghi, K.; Kim, Y. J.; Trauner, D.; Flannery, J.; Isacoff, E. Y. Restoration of patterned vision with an engineered photoactivatable G protein-coupled receptor. *Nat. Commun.* **2017**, *8* (1), 1862.
(12) Tsai, Y. H.; Essig, S.; James, J. R.; Lang, K.; Chin, J. W. Selective, rapid and optically switchable regulation of protein function in live mammalian cells. *Nat. Chem.* **2015**, *7* (7), 554–561.

(13) Broichhagen, J.; Frank, J. A.; Trauner, D. A Roadmap to Success in Photopharmacology. *Acc. Chem. Res.* **2015**, *48*, 1947–1960.

(14) Campbell, J. E.; Drucker, D. J. Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. *Cell Metab.* **2013**, *17* (6), 819–837.

(15) Gefel, D.; Hendrick, G. K.; Mojsov, S.; Habener, J.; Weir, G. C. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs: effects on insulin secretion and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate formation. *Endocrinology* **1990**, *126* (4), 2164–2168.

(16) Thorens, B. Expression cloning of the pancreatic beta cell receptor for the gluco-incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **1992**, *89* (18), 8641–8645.

(17) Holz, G. G. t.; Leech, C. A.; Habener, J. F. Activation of a cAMP-regulated Ca(2+)-signaling pathway in pancreatic beta-cells by the insulinotropic hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. *J. Biol. Chem.* **1995**, *270* (30), 17749–17757.

(18) Gromada, J.; Bokvist, K.; Ding, W. G.; Holst, J. J.; Nielsen, J. H.; Rorsman, P. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (7–36) amide stimulates exocytosis in human pancreatic beta-cells by both proximal and distal regulatory steps in stimulus-secretion coupling. *Diabetes* **1998**, *47* (1), 57–65.

(19) Holz, G. G. Epac: A new cAMP-binding protein in support of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-mediated signal transduction in the pancreatic beta-cell. *Diabetes* **2004**, *53* (1), 5–13.

(20) Holz, G. G.; Leech, C. A.; Heller, R. S.; Castonguay, M.; Habener, J. F. cAMP-dependent mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ stores by activation of ryanodine receptors in pancreatic beta-cells. A Ca2+ signaling system stimulated by the insulinotropic hormone glucagon-like peptide-1-(7–37). *J. Biol. Chem.* **1999**, *274* (20), 14147–14156.

(21) Roed, S. N.; Nohr, A. C.; Wismann, P.; Iversen, H.; Brauner-Osborne, H.; Knudsen, S. M.; Waldhoer, M. Functional consequences of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor cross-talk and trafficking. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2015**, *290* (2), 1233–1243.

(22) Calebiro, D.; Nikolaev, V. O.; Gagliani, M. C.; de Filippis, T.; Dees, C.; Tacchetti, C.; Persani, L.; Lohse, M. J. Persistent cAMP-signals triggered by internalized G-protein-coupled receptors. *PLoS Biol.* **2009**, *7* (8), e1000172.

(23) Kuna, R. S.; Girada, S. B.; Asalla, S.; Vallentyne, J.; Maddika, S.; Patterson, J. T.; Smiley, D. L.; DiMarchi, R. D.; Mitra, P. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-mediated endosomal cAMP generation promotes glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. *Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.* **2013**, *305* (2), 161–170.

(24) Vilardaga, J. P.; Jean-Alphonse, F. G.; Gardella, T. J. Endosomal generation of cAMP in GPCR signaling. *Nat. Chem. Biol.* **2014**, *10* (9), 700–706.

(25) Roed, S. N.; Wismann, P.; Underwood, C. R.; Kulahin, N.; Iversen, H.; Cappelen, K. A.; Schäffer, L.; Lehtonen, J.; Hecksher-Soerensen, J.; Secher, A.; Mathiesen, J. M.; Brauner-Osborne, H.; Whistler, J. L.; Knudsen, S. M.; Waldhoer, M. Real-time trafficking and signaling of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. *Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.* **2014**, *382* (2), 938–949.

(26) Drucker, D. J. The Cardiovascular Biology of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. *Cell Metab.* **2016**, *24* (1), 15–30.

(27) Hogan, A. E.; Gaoatswe, G.; Lynch, L.; Corrigan, M. A.; Woods, C.; O'Connell, J.; O'Shea, D. Glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue therapy directly modulates innate immune-mediated inflammation in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. *Diabetologia* **2014**, *57* (4), 781–784.

(28) Dailey, M. J.; Moran, T. H. Glucagon-like peptide 1 and appetite. *Trends Endocrinol. Metab.* **2013**, *24* (2), 85–91.

(29) Panjwani, N.; Mulvihill, E. E.; Longuet, C.; Yusta, B.; Campbell, J. E.; Brown, T. J.; Streutker, C.; Holland, D.; Cao, X.; Baggio, L. L.; Drucker, D. J. GLP-1 receptor activation indirectly reduces hepatic lipid accumulation but does not attenuate development of atherosclerosis in diabetic male ApoE(−/−) mice. *Endocrinology* **2013**, *154* (1), 127–139.

(30) Kim, M.; Platt, M. J.; Shibasaki, T.; Quaggin, S. E.; Backx, P. H.; Seino, S.; Simpson, J. A.; Drucker, D. J. GLP-1 receptor activation and

Epac2 link atrial natriuretic peptide secretion to control of blood pressure. *Nat. Med.* **2013**, *19* (5), 567–575.

(31) Hansotia, T.; Baggio, L. L.; Delmeire, D.; Hinke, S. A.; Yamada, Y.; Tsukiyama, K.; Seino, Y.; Holst, J. J.; Schuit, F.; Drucker, D. J. Double incretin receptor knockout (DIRKO) mice reveal an essential role for the enteroinosular axis in transducing the glucoregulatory actions of DPP-IV inhibitors. *Diabetes* **2004**, *53* (5), 1326–1335.

(32) Kojima, M.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin: Structure and Function. *Physiol. Rev.* **2005**, *85* (2), 495–522.

(33) Osterstock, G.; Escobar, P.; Mitutsova, V.; Gouty-Colomer, L. A.; Fontanaud, P.; Molino, F.; Fehrentz, J. A.; Carmignac, D.; Martinez, J.; Guerineau, N. C.; Robinson, I. C.; Mollard, P.; Mery, P. F. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone-releasing hormone neurons is direct in the arcuate nucleus. *PLoS One* **2010**, *5* (2), e9159.

(34) Schaeffer, M.; Langlet, F.; Lafont, C.; Molino, F.; Hodson, D. J.; Roux, T.; Lamarque, L.; Verdie, P.; Bourrier, E.; Dehouck, B.; Baneres, J. L.; Martinez, J.; Mery, P. F.; Marie, J.; Trinquet, E.; Fehrentz, J. A.; Prevot, V.; Mollard, P. Rapid sensing of circulating ghrelin by hypothalamic appetite-modifying neurons. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **2013**, *110* (4), 1512–1517.

(35) Underwood, C. R.; Garibay, P.; Knudsen, L. B.; Hastrup, S.; Peters, G. H.; Rudolph, R.; Reedtz-Runge, S. Crystal structure of glucagon-like peptide-1 in complex with the extracellular domain of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2010**, *285* (1), 723–730.

(36) Runge, S.; Thogersen, H.; Madsen, K.; Lau, J.; Rudolph, R. Crystal structure of the ligand-bound glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor extracellular domain. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2008**, *283* (17), 11340–11347.

(37) Roed, S. N.; Wismann, P.; Underwood, C. R.; Kulahin, N.; Iversen, H.; Cappelen, K. A.; Schäffer, L.; Lehtonen, J.; Hecksher-Soerensen, J.; Secher, A.; Mathiesen, J. M.; Bräuner-Osborne, H.; Whistler, J. L.; Knudsen, S. M.; Waldhoer, M. Real-time trafficking and signaling of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. *Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.* **2014**, *382* (2), 938–949.

(38) Wootten, D.; Reynolds, C. A.; Smith, K. J.; Mobarec, J. C.; Koole, C.; Savage, E. E.; Pabreja, K.; Simms, J.; Sridhar, R.; Furness, S. G.; Liu, M.; Thompson, P. E.; Miller, L. J.; Christopoulos, A.; Sexton, P. M. The Extracellular Surface of the GLP-1 Receptor Is a Molecular Trigger for Biased Agonism. *Cell* **2016**, *165* (7), 1632–1643.

(39) Klarenbeek, J. B.; Goedhart, J.; Hink, M. A.; Gadella, T. W. J.; Jalink, K. A mTurquoise-Based cAMP Sensor for Both FLIM and Ratiometric Read-Out Has Improved Dynamic Range. *PLoS One* **2011**, *6* (4), e19170.

(40) Harvey, C. D.; Ehrhardt, A. G.; Cellurale, C.; Zhong, H.; Yasuda, R.; Davis, R. J.; Svoboda, K. A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor of ERK activity. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **2008**, *105* (49), 19264–19269.

(41) Kenakin, T.; Christopoulos, A. Signalling bias in new drug discovery: detection, quantification and therapeutic impact. *Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery* **2012**, *12* (3), 205–216.

(42) Klein Herenbrink, C.; Sykes, D. A.; Donthamsetti, P.; Canals, M.; Coudrat, T.; Shonberg, J.; Scammells, P. J.; Capuano, B.; Sexton, P. M.; Charlton, S. J.; Javitch, J. A.; Christopoulos, A.; Lane, J. R. The role of kinetic context in apparent biased agonism at GPCRs. *Nat. Commun.* **2016**, *7*, 10842.

(43) Everett, K. L.; Cooper, D. M. An improved targeted cAMP sensor to study the regulation of adenylyl cyclase 8 by Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated channels. *PLoS One* **2013**, *8* (9), e75942.

(44) Delporte, C. Structure and physiological actions of ghrelin. *Scientifica* **2013**, *2013*, 518909.

(45) Bednarek, M. A.; Feighner, S. D.; Pong, S. S.; McKee, K. K.; Hreniuk, D. L.; Silva, M. V.; Warren, V. A.; Howard, A. D.; Van Der Ploeg, L. H.; Heck, J. V. Structure-function studies on the new growth hormone-releasing peptide, ghrelin: minimal sequence of ghrelin necessary for activation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a. *J. Med. Chem.* **2000**, *43* (23), 4370–4376.

(46) Mear, Y.; Enjalbert, A.; Thirion, S. GHS-R1a constitutive activity and its physiological relevance. *Front. Neurosci.* **2013**, *7* (87), 1–5.
(47) Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. *Nature* **1999**, *402* (6762), 656–660.

(48) Nielsen, S. M.; Nielsen, L. Z.; Hjorth, S. A.; Perrin, M. H.; Vale, W. W. Constitutive activation of tethered-peptide/corticotropin-releasing factor receptor chimeras. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **2000**, *97* (18), 10277–10281.

(49) Yin, Y.; Zhou, X. E.; Hou, L.; Zhao, L.-H.; Liu, B.; Wang, G.; Jiang, Y.; Melcher, K.; Xu, H. E. An intrinsic agonist mechanism for activation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor by its extracellular domain. *Cell Discovery* **2016**, *2*, 16042.

(50) Choi, C.; Nitabach, M. N. Membrane-tethered ligands: tools for cell-autonomous pharmacological manipulation of biological circuits. *Physiology* **2013**, *28* (3), 164–171.

(51) Fortin, J. P.; Zhu, Y.; Choi, C.; Beinborn, M.; Nitabach, M. N.; Kopin, A. S. Membrane-tethered ligands are effective probes for exploring class B1 G protein-coupled receptor function. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.* **2009**, *106* (19), 8049–8054.

(52) Krishnamurthy, V. M.; Semetey, V.; Bracher, P. J.; Shen, N.; Whitesides, G. M. Dependence of effective polarity on linker length for an intramolecular protein-ligand system. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2007**, *129* (5), 1312–1320.

(53) Cole, N. B.; Donaldson, J. G. Releasable SNAP-tag probes for studying endocytosis and recycling. *ACS Chem. Biol.* **2012**, *7* (3), 464–469.

(54) Smith, E. P.; An, Z.; Wagner, C.; Lewis, A. G.; Cohen, E. B.; Li, B.; Mahbod, P.; Sandoval, D.; Perez-Tilve, D.; Tamarina, N.; Philipson, L. H.; Stoffers, D. A.; Seeley, R. J.; D'Alessio, D. A. The Role of β Cell Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Signaling in Glucose Regulation and Response to Diabetes Drugs. *Cell Metab.* **2014**, *19* (6), 1050–1057.

(55) Platt, R. J.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Yim, M. J.; Swiech, L.; Kempton, H. R.; Dahlman, J. E.; Parnas, O.; Eisenhaure, T. M.; Jovanovic, M.; Graham, D. B.; Jhunjhunwala, S.; Heidenreich, M.; Xavier, R. J.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. G.; Hacohen, N.; Regev, A.; Feng, G.; Sharp, P. A.; Zhang, F. CRISPR-Cas9 Knockin Mice for Genome Editing and Cancer Modeling. *Cell* **2014**, *159* (2), 440–455.

(56) Quarta, C.; Clemmensen, C.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, B.; Joseph, S. S.; Lutter, D.; Yi, C. X.; Graf, E.; Garcia-Caceres, C.; Legutko, B.; Fischer, K.; Brommage, R.; Zizzari, P.; Franklin, B. S.; Krueger, M.; Koch, M.; Vettorazzi, S.; Li, P.; Hofmann, S. M.; Bakhti, M.; Bastidas-Ponce, A.; Lickert, H.; Strom, T. M.; Gailus-Durner, V.; Bechmann, I.; Perez-Tilve, D.; Tuckermann, J.; Hrabe de Angelis, M.; Sandoval, D.; Cota, D.; Latz, E.; Seeley, R. J.; Muller, T. D.; DiMarchi, R. D.; Finan, B.; Tschop, M. H. Molecular Integration of Incretin and Glucocorticoid Action Reverses Immunometabolic Dysfunction and Obesity. *Cell Metab.* **2017**, *26* (4), 620–632e6.

(57) Lundblad, R. L. *Chemical Reagents for Protein Modification*, CRC Press, 2014.

(58) Friedman Ohana, R.; Levin, S.; Wood, M. G.; Zimmerman, K.; Dart, M. L.; Schwinn, M. K.; Kirkland, T. A.; Hurst, R.; Uyeda, H. T.; Encell, L. P.; Wood, K. V. Improved Deconvolution of Protein Targets for Bioactive Compounds Using a Palladium Cleavable Chloroalkane Capture Tag. *ACS Chem. Biol.* **2016**, *11* (9), 2608–2617.

(59) Azoulay, M.; Tuffin, G.; Sallem, W.; Florent, J. C. A new drug-release method using the Staudinger ligation. *Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.* **2006**, *16* (12), 3147–3149.

(60) Versteegen, R. M.; Rossin, R.; ten Hoeve, W.; Janssen, H. M.; Robillard, M. S. Click to release: instantaneous doxorubicin elimination upon tetrazine ligation. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2013**, *52* (52), 14112–14116.

(61) Bernard, S.; Audisio, D.; Riomet, M.; Bregant, S.; Sallustrau, A.; Plougastel, L.; Decuypere, E.; Gabillet, S.; Kumar, R. A.; Elyian, J.; Trinh, M. N.; Koniev, O.; Wagner, A.; Kolodych, S.; Taran, F. Bioorthogonal Click and Release Reaction of Iminosydnones with Cycloalkynes. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2017**, *56* (49), 15612–15616.

(62) Cork, S. C.; Richards, J. E.; Holt, M. K.; Gribble, F. M.; Reimann, F.; Trapp, S. Distribution and characterisation of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor expressing cells in the mouse brain. *Mol. Metab.* **2015**, *4* (10), 718–731.

(63) Brubaker, P. L.; Drucker, D. J. Structure-function of the glucagon receptor family of G protein-coupled receptors: the glucagon, GIP, GLP-1, and GLP-2 receptors. *Recept. Channels* **2002**, *8* (3–4), 179–188.

(64) Tsvetanova, N. G.; von Zastrow, M. Spatial encoding of cyclic AMP signaling specificity by GPCR endocytosis. *Nat. Chem. Biol.* **2014**, *10* (12), 1061–1065.

(65) Flores-Otero, J.; Ahn, K. H.; Delgado-Peraza, F.; Mackie, K.; Kendall, D. A.; Yudowski, G. A. Ligand-specific endocytic dwell times control functional selectivity of the cannabinoid receptor 1. *Nat. Commun.* **2014**, *5*, No. 4589, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5589.

(66) Klein Herenbrink, C.; Sykes, D. A.; Donthamsetti, P.; Canals, M.; Coudrat, T.; Shonberg, J.; Scammells, P. J.; Capuano, B.; Sexton, P. M.; Charlton, S. J.; Javitch, J. A.; Christopoulos, A.; Lane, J. R. The role of kinetic context in apparent biased agonism at GPCRs. *Nat. Commun.* **2016**, *7*, No. 10842.

(67) Hwang, C.; Sinskey, A. J.; Lodish, H. F. Oxidized redox state of glutathione in the endoplasmic reticulum. *Science* **1992**, *257* (5076), 1496–1502.

(68) Hodson, D. J.; Mitchell, R. K.; Marselli, L.; Pullen, T. J.; Gimeno Brias, S.; Semplici, F.; Everett, K. L.; Cooper, D. M.; Bugliani, M.; Marchetti, P.; Lavallard, V.; Bosco, D.; Piemonti, L.; Johnson, P. R.; Hughes, S. J.; Li, D.; Li, W. H.; Shapiro, A. M.; Rutter, G. A. ADCY5 couples glucose to insulin secretion in human islets. *Diabetes* **2014**, *63* (9), 3009–3021.

(69) Broichhagen, J.; Podewin, T.; Meyer-Berg, H.; von Ohlen, Y.; Johnston, N. R.; Jones, B. J.; Bloom, S. R.; Rutter, G. A.; Hoffmann-Röder, A.; Hodson, D. J.; Trauner, D. Optical Control of Insulin Secretion Using an Incretin Switch. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2015**, *54* (51), 15565–15569.

(70) Hodson, D. J.; Mitchell, R. K.; Bellomo, E. A.; Sun, G.; Vinet, L.; Meda, P.; Li, D.; Li, W. H.; Bugliani, M.; Marchetti, P.; Bosco, D.; Piemonti, L.; Johnson, P.; Hughes, S. J.; Rutter, G. A. Lipotoxicity disrupts incretin-regulated human beta cell connectivity. *J. Clin. Invest.* **2013**, *123* (10), 4182–4194.

(71) Hodson, D. J.; Tarasov, A. I.; Gimeno Brias, S.; Mitchell, R. K.; Johnston, N. R.; Haghollahi, S.; Cane, M. C.; Bugliani, M.; Marchetti, P.; Bosco, D.; Johnson, P. R.; Hughes, S. J.; Rutter, G. A. Incretin-modulated beta cell energetics in intact islets of Langerhans. *Mol. Endocrinol.* **2014**, *28* (6), 860–871.

(72) Leyris, J. P.; Roux, T.; Trinquet, E.; Verdie, P.; Fehrentz, J. A.; Oueslati, N.; Douzon, S.; Bourrier, E.; Lamarque, L.; Gagne, D.; Galleyrand, J. C.; M'Kadmi, C.; Martinez, J.; Mary, S.; Baneres, J. L.; Marie, J. Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence-based assay to screen for ligands targeting the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a. *Anal. Biochem.* **2011**, *408* (2), 253–262.

(73) M'Kadmi, C.; Leyris, J. P.; Onfroy, L.; Gales, C.; Sauliere, A.; Gagne, D.; Damian, M.; Mary, S.; Maingot, M.; Denoyelle, S.; Verdie, P.; Fehrentz, J. A.; Martinez, J.; Baneres, J. L.; Marie, J. Agonism, Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2015**, *290* (45), 27021–27039.

(74) Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Feng, D.; Hu, H.; Chu, M.; Qu, Q.; Tarrasch, J. T.; Li, S.; Sun Kobilka, T.; Kobilka, B. K.; Skiniotis, G. Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. *Nature* **2017**, *546* (7657), 248–253.