# Ominoxanthone-The First Xanthone Linearly Fused to a γ-Lactone from Cortinarius ominosus Bidaud Basidiomata. CASE- and DFT-Based Structure Elucidation

Alice Trac, Célia Issaad, Mehdi Beniddir, Jean-Michel Bellanger, Jean-François Gallard, Alexei Buevich, Mikhail Elyashberg, Pierre Le Pogam

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Alice Trac, Célia Issaad, Mehdi Beniddir, Jean-Michel Bellanger, Jean-François Gallard, et al. "Ominoxanthone-The First Xanthone Linearly Fused to a γ-Lactone from Cortinarius ominosus Bidaud Basidiomata. CASE- and DFT-Based Structure Elucidation. Molecules, 2023, 28 (4), pp.1557. 10.3390/molecules28041557. hal-04081617

HAL Id: hal-04081617

https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04081617

Submitted on 18 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Ominoxanthone—The First Xanthone Linearly Fused to a γ-Lactone from *Cortinarius ominosus* Bidaud Basidiomata. CASE- and DFT-Based Structure Elucidation

Alice Trac<fnref n="1" />, Célia Issaad<fnref n="1" />, Mehdi A. Beniddir<fnref n="1" />✉, Jean-Michel Bellanger<fnref n="2" />✉, Jean-François Gallard<fnref n="3" />, Alexei V. Buevich<fnref n="4" />, Mikhail E. Elyashberg<fnref n="5" />,* and Pierre Le Pogam<fnref n="1" />,*

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Trac, A.; Issaad, C.; Beniddir, M.A.; Bellanger, J.-M.; Gallard, J.-F.; Buevich, A.V.; Elyashberg, M.E.; Le Pogam, P. Ominoxanthone—The First Xanthone Linearly Fused to a γ-Lactone from *Cortinarius ominosus* Bidaud Basidiomata. CASE- and DFT-Based Structure Elucidation. *Molecules* **2023**, *28*, 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041557

Academic Editor: Angelo Facchiano

Received: 9 January 2023

Revised: 27 January 2023

Accepted: 1 February 2023

Published: 6 February 2023

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).

**Abstract:** The UHPLC-HRMS analysis of *Cortinarius ominosus* basidiomata extract revealed that this mushroom accumulated elevated yields of an unreported specialized metabolite. The molecular formula of this unknown compound, C₁₇H₁₀O₈, indicated that a challenging structure elucidation lay ahead, owing to its critically low H/C atom ratio. The structure of this new isolate, namely ominoxanthone (1), could not be solved from the interpretation of the usual set of 1D/2D NMR data that conveyed too limited information to afford a single, unambiguous structure. To remedy this, a Computer-Assisted Structure Elucidation (CASE) workflow was used to rank the different possible structure candidates consistent with our scarce spectroscopic data. DFT-based chemical shift calculations on a limited set of top-ranked structures further ascertained the determined structure for ominoxanthone. Although the determined scaffold of ominoxanthone is unprecedented as a natural product, a plausible biosynthetic scenario involving a precursor known from cortinariaceous sources and classical biogenetic reactions could be proposed.

**Keywords:** CASE; DFT-NMR; xanthone; fungus

## 1. Introduction

In the frame of our efforts dedicated to the description of new fungal metabolites [1], the UHPLC-HRMS analysis of the DCM/MeOH (1/1, *v*/*v*) extract of *Cortinarius ominosus* attracted our attention. It appeared that this mushroom accumulated considerable amounts of a compound detected at *m/z* 343.0450, for an elemental composition of C₁₇H₁₀O₈. Quite remarkably, this molecular formula returned no hit in the *Dictionary of Natural Products* [2], prompting us to undertake its isolation for subsequent structure elucidation. Even though this precise molecular formula had not been formerly described, it was reminiscent of octaketide-derived anthraquinonic pigments repeatedly reported to occur from cortinariaceous sources [3]. Mushrooms pertaining to the genus *Cortinarius* and, more saliently yet, to the *Dermocybe* subgenus, are known to produce a wide variety of hydroxylated anthraquinones, preanthraquinones and pyranonaphthoquinones that are responsible for the yellow, orange or red colors of their fruiting bodies [4]. The sought-after compound, namely ominoxanthone (1), could be straightforwardly purified by preparative HPLC from the crude extract.

<footnote n="1">1 Équipe "Chimie des Substances Naturelles" BioCIS, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 17 Avenue des Sciences, 91400 Orsay, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 CEFE, CNRS, Université Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, INSERM, 1919 Route de Mende, CEDEX 5, 34293 Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, CNRS, ICSN UPR 2301, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">4 Process and Analytical Chemistry, Merck & Co., Inc., 2015 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, New Jersey, NJ 07033, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Advanced Chemistry Development Inc. (ACD/Labs), 8 King Street, Toronto, ON M5C 1B5, Canada</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: mikhail.elyashberg@acdlabs.com (M.E.E.); pierre.le-pogam-alluard@universite-paris-saclay.fr (P.L.P.)</footnote>
## 2. Results and Discussion

A first difficulty with **1** is that it was sparingly soluble in most common NMR solvents. This was rather unexpected, as the numerous polyketide pigments extracted from *Cortinarius* spp. had their NMR spectra recorded in usual solvents. Among the different investigated solvents, TFA-*d* represented the best option to facilitate the dissolution and acquisition of NMR data. Alternatively, DMSO-*d*<sub>6</sub> also afforded <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>13</sup>C NMR data of convenient quality, but the <sup>1</sup>H NMR signals were too broad to disclose a satisfying HMBC spectrum.

The <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum of **1** revealed three aromatic protons ((δ<sub>H</sub> 7.47 (1H, s), 7.53, and 8.00)) with the two latter being *meta*-arranged (1H both, d, *J* = 2.3 Hz), an oxygenated methylene group (δ<sub>H</sub> 5.82 (2H, s)), and a methoxy group (δ<sub>H</sub> 4.34 (3H, s)). The <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectrum, in conjunction with the HSQC spectrum, revealed the presence of three carbonyl groups, three aromatic methines, an oxygenated methylene, a methoxy, and nine nonprotonated aromatic carbons (including four oxygenated carbons). Along with its molecular formula, these NMR landmarks hinted that **1** should correspond to a methoxylated octaketide, consistent with most polyketides known from *Cortinarius* species [3]. Biosynthetically speaking, canonical octaketide-derived anthraquinones are assembled from a linear precursor comprising an acetate starter and seven malonate units [5]. The regioselective fungal cyclization pattern of the linear polyketide precursor, the so-called F mode, is expected to afford two odd-numbered side chains that result in the canonical endocrocin framework (Figure 1A), even though the frequent decarboxylation at C-2 often leads to a final metabolite revealing only one odd-numbered side chain [6]. When embarking on the structure elucidation of **1**, we thus hypothesized that the oxygenated methylene group should be located at C-3, on the A-ring (Figure 1).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** (A) Chemical structure of endocrocin, biosynthetic cornerstone of fungal polyketides. (B) Chemical structure of noraustrocorticin, anthraquinonic pigment reported from an unidentified Australian *Cortinarius* species. (C) Key 2D NMR correlations plotted on the oxepinedione-containing seco-anthraquinone scaffold hypothesis **1A**. (D) Key 2D NMR correlations plotted on the xanthone scaffold hypothesis **1B**.</figcaption></figure>

The relative disposition of substituents could be deduced from ROE experiments that placed the methoxy group between the two *meta*-disposed aromatic protons, as further confirmed based on the COSY crosspeak between these latter two. As this spin system did not involve the methyleneoxy signal, it was supposed that these signals were related
to the C-ring (Figure 1A). These spectroscopic features were indeed reminiscent of the C-ring of many polyketide pigments that often incorporate this substitution pattern, occupying positions C-5, C-6, and C-7 (Figure 1A), but C-5 and C-7 could not be assigned a specific position [5,7,8]. Taking into account both molecular formula requirements and the polyketide origin of **1** guided us to infer that a -OH group should be located at C-8, even though this hypothesis found no spectroscopic support. Even though the occurrence of an oxygenated substituent at C-8 is consensual within cortinariaceous polyketides, a comparison of C-ring NMR signals to those of anthraquinones disclosing a similarly substituted C-ring revealed a very limited degree of NMR spectroscopic data similarity. In particular, the difference in the ¹³C NMR chemical shifts of the aromatic methines of this ring in **1** contrasted with former anthraquinones that disclose nearly equivalent resonances for these two positions [5,7]. Regarding the other spin system, tentatively located on the A-ring, ROESY and COSY crosspeaks could be observed between the oxygenated methylenic protons H₂-3' and the third, isolated aromatic proton H-4. The HMBC correlations from the oxymethylenic protons H₂-3' to the carbonyl-type carbon resonating at δC 176.3 (2-COO) to two aromatic quaternaries at δC 108.6 (C-2) and 158.8 (C-3) and to the aromatic methine at δC 104.0 (C-4) defined a benzenoid ring fused with a γ-lactone nucleus. These NMR features evoked cortinariaceous metabolites such as noraustrocorticin (Figure 1B) [5]. The good agreement between these substructure NMR data and those obtained from noraustrocorticin further supported this option, also suggesting that a -OH group should be located at C-1, in conjunction with the requirement for this cycle to be pentasubstituted and with molecular formula requirements. Again, this assumption is reasonable from a biosynthetic standpoint but lacked direct spectroscopic evidence. Even after two phenolic groups had been introduced without direct spectroscopic support, three oxygen atoms still had to be placed onto the structure of **1** to fulfill molecular formula requirements. This rules out the possibility for **1** to disclose an anthraquinonic scaffold. Interestingly, the cursory examination of the HMBC spectrum revealed a ⁴J HMBC correlation from both the aromatic protons resonating at δH 7.53 (H-5 or H-7) and at δH 7.47 (H-4) to a carbonyl-type carbon at δC 184.1 (C-9), determining that **1** comprised a benzophenone frame. The most straightforward strategy to complete the structure, in agreement with the obtained molecular formula, was to connect the two benzene rings through a lactone function tethering C-4a with C-10a. Such a connection would result in an oxepinedione-type B-ring, affording a first structure proposition, **1A** (Figure 1C). This tentative core proves satisfactory for some spectroscopic features that were inconsistent with an anthraquinone core. Accordingly, the HMBC correlation from the aromatic proton H-4 to an oxygenated sp² carbon resonating at δC 163.4 (C-4a) was in line with the introduction of an oxygen atom contiguous to it, as was further supported by the ⁴J HMBC correlation from the H₂-3' to the same carbon. Likewise, the long-range heteronuclear correlations observed from C-ring signals appeared consistent with structure **1A**. A first aromatic proton detected at δH 8.00 (H-5 in this hypothesis) revealed an HMBC correlation with C-6 and with a carbonyl-type carbon detected at δC 175.2, seemingly ascribable to the lactonic C-10, while the second aromatic proton at δH 7.53 (tentatively, H-7) displayed reasonable HMBC crosspeaks with C-6 and with an oxygenated sp² carbon resonating at δC 162.30 (compatible with C-8), along with the formerly reported ⁴J correlation to C-9. Even though these data were fully accommodated by structure **1A**, we could envisage an alternative structure, **1B**, compliant with all aforementioned spectroscopic features (Figure 1D). This structure comprised a xanthonic scaffold and a carboxylic acid function at C-8. Again, the HMBC correlations between the aromatic proton detected at δH 7.53 (corresponding here to H-5) and the oxygenated sp² carbon detected at δC 162.3 would then represent a correlation with C-10a. Likewise, the HMBC crosspeak between the second aromatic proton at δH 8.00 and the carbon at δC 175.2 could be explained by an H-5 to 8-COOH correlation.

A bibliographic survey confirmed the considerable difficulties in distinguishing these two scaffolds, as such pairs of compounds display identical carbon connectivities, and thus similar sets of HMBC correlations [9]. Interestingly, oxepinedione-containing metabolites
were claimed to have been isolated from fungal sources on several occasions, mostly from micromycetes [10–12]. It turned out that many such metabolites had been erroneously elucidated at first and had later been revised into carboxylic acid-containing xanthones [9,13]. As an illustration, the structure revision of wentiquinone C is outlined below (Figure 2).

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Structure revision of an oxepinedione-containing anthraquinone to a carboxylic acid-containing scaffold: example of wentiquinone C.</figcaption></figure>

The minor differences in the NMR data of xanthones and seco-anthraquinones had been stressed at least twice throughout the literature, resulting in batch structure revisions [9,13]. These revisions rely on chemical derivatization strategies, as they are based on the cursory analysis of NMR landmarks of methylated derivatives. Accordingly, the appearance of methoxyester related resonances (δ<sub>C</sub> < 55 ppm) after methylation presumably indicates the initial presence of a free carboxylic acid that could, therefore, not be involved in the cyclization process, thereby indicating a xanthone core. In simpler cases, a methoxy ester function natively existed in the natural product, but its misinterpretation as an aromatic methoxy group sometimes led to mistaken assignments of the structure as an oxepinedione derivative instead of the correct methoxyester-containing xanthone [9,13].

Interestingly, **1B** exhibited a structural difference to **1A** analogous to that existing between oxepinediones and their revised xanthone (Figure 2). A feature in favor of **1B** over **1A** was the excellent agreement between the NMR spectroscopic data of **1** with that of a carboxylic acid-xanthone (Figure 3) [9,14].

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Compared <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shifts related to C-ring signals of **1B** with those of wentiquinone C (the chemical shifts used for comparison are taken from the NMR spectra acquired in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>).</figcaption></figure>

Overall, the cursory examination of the NMR spectroscopic data of **1** guided us to privilege structure **1B** for ominoxanthone, yet the information available from the key NMR experiments acquired from this isolate is rather limited due to its proton-deficient nature, rendering the structure elucidation tortuous. The so-called Crews' rule foresees that NMR-based structure elucidation is at high risk of being inaccurate when the ratio of H/C atoms is less than one, as it is the case here [15]. The scarce information available from the NMR data of such structures is likely to result in several possible candidates, and it is therefore important to ensure that all possibilities have been duly considered [16].

To verify our structural hypothesis, we elected to submit the NMR spectroscopic data of **1** to a Computer-Assisted Structure Elucidation (CASE) workflow [17], through the ACD/Structure Elucidator (ACD/SE) expert system [18]. Briefly, this program takes
the benefit of the HRMS-deduced molecular formula and of the 1D (¹H and ¹³C) and 2D (COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) NMR spectra to create Molecular Connectivity Diagrams (MCD). This graphically depicts all atoms and XHn moieties, along with their chemical shifts and properties (valence, hybridization, and admissibility of a neighbor heteroatom). COSY-derived connectivities, diagnostic of a length of one C–C bond (³JHH), and HMBC correlations, presumably indicative of a distance of one or two C–C bonds (²,³JCH), are further embedded into MCD. The logic-combinatorial analysis of the data displayed in MCD allows for structure generation of all possible structural isomers for a given molecular formula and 1D and 2D NMR data. Spectral and structural-based filters are subsequently applied to retrieve a list of tentative candidates [17]. The choice of the most probable structures among the set of generated candidates is based on the prediction of their ¹³C NMR chemical shifts using three empirical methods: incremental, neural network, and HOSE code (Hierarchical Organization of Spherical Environments) [19,20], resulting in a usual accuracy of 1.6 to 1.8 ppm [17]. Following this step of chemical shift prediction, the different structures of the CASE output file are ranked in order of increasing discrepancy between experimental and predicted NMR chemical shifts, usually expressed as the average deviation. Higher accuracy quantum-mechanical calculations can be applied to some of the top-ranked CASE-derived structures if this workflow does not succeed in unambiguously distinguishing the correct structure [21,22].

The spectroscopic data for **1** acquired in TFA-*d* were used by the ACD/SE program to produce an MCD (Figure 4), from which the strict structure generation workflow could propose eight possible structures within 31 min (Figure S14).

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Molecular Connectivity Diagram obtained from the NMR data of ominoxanthone (C₁₇H₁₀O₈) recorded in TFA-*d*. Carbons hybridized as *sp*³ and *sp*² are respectively written in navy blue and violet. The admissibility of a neighbor heteroatom is indicated by the labels « ob » (obligatory) and « fb » (forbidden). HMBC connectivities are indicated by green arrows. Violet arrows refer to nonstandard correlations (length *n* > 3, for *n*JHH,CH). These correlations were set for the weak HMBC signals.</figcaption></figure>

These structures were ranked in increasing order of average deviation *d*<sub>A</sub>, *d*<sub>N</sub> and *d*<sub>I</sub> as shown in Figure S14. Three top-ranked structures supplied with automatically assigned chemical shifts are presented in Figure 5. The maximal ¹³C deviation is also provided for each structure. Gratifyingly, the first ranked structure was identical to structure **1B**. Quite interestingly, the alternative structure **1A** turned out to be the third preferred option of the CASE workflow (Figure 5).
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Three top-ranked candidate structures (1, 2 and 3) listed in order of increasing spectroscopic discrepancies. Average deviations are reported according to the prediction method—d<sub>A</sub>, HOSE-code; d<sub>N</sub>, neural network; and d<sub>I</sub>, incremental approach—along with the maximal <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shift deviation for each prediction method.</figcaption></figure>

Unfortunately, the average mean deviations obtained between experimental and predicted <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shifts proved to be of the same order and were higher than typically observed differences in such analyses (viz. d<sub>n</sub> < 3 ppm, with n = A, I and N). As ACD/Predictors [18] were trained on databases containing NMR spectra recorded in conventional solvents, it is rather probable that the discrepancies could be a consequence of the NMR data being acquired in TFA-d. That is a very rarely chosen NMR solvent, but known to exert a substantial influence on <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shifts [23]. We wanted to assess if better results could have been obtained by comparing simulated spectra against NMR data acquired in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>, even though the degree of information retrieved from these spectra was comparatively lower due to broader <sup>1</sup>H signals. To compensate for the low level of correlations obtained in this solvent, we wished to adapt the MCD obtained from TFA-d to the signals observed in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>. For this purpose, the assignments were ordered by decreasing chemical shift values in both NMR data sets and transposed accordingly, unless explicitly contradicted by spectroscopic features obtained in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>. While this strategy does not guarantee the correctness of all assignments, we assumed that swapped signals upon solvent change should display close chemical shift values, so this strategy should result in moderate chemical shift errors. The MCD created from NMR data which were acquired in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> is shown in Figure S15. As a result of structure generation, 20 structures were obtained in 34 min. The three top-ranked structures are presented in Figure 6.

Again, **1B** turned out to be the preferred structure (Figure 6). Satisfactorily, the magnitude of deviations obtained from this more conventional NMR solvent lay in the typical range of those obtained with correct structures. It is worth underlining that the second preferred option, the angular xanthone, was the same as in the CASE workflow performed from the NMR data obtained using TFA-d as a solvent. We have welcomed this proposal with some skepticism, as such an angular xanthone did not respect the endocrocin framework constantly found in anthraquinone carboxylic acids reported from *Dermocybe/Cortinarius* mushrooms [3,24]. Calculation of empirical DP4 probabilities endorsed the priority of structure #1 (Figure 6): DP4<sub>A</sub>(<sup>13</sup>C) = 95.29%, DP4<sub>N</sub>(<sup>13</sup>C) = 99.5%, and DP4<sub>I</sub>(<sup>13</sup>C) = 100%. Nevertheless, additional confirmation of the best structure by DFT <sup>13</sup>C chemical shift prediction is desirable even in this case [21,22]. The selection of the best structure obviously
deserved a better confirmation, guiding us to undertake accurate DFT-NMR calculations to discriminate between the three best structures (Tables 1 and 2). The summary of these QM calculations is provided in Figure S16 (Supplementary Materials). The DFT-NMR predicted ¹³C NMR chemical shifts unequivocally defined structure #1 (corresponding to the so-called structure **1B**) as the most probable structure, based on both minimal root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and lowest maximal deviation (Max_dev) of ¹³C NMR chemical shifts.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Three top-ranked candidate structures (1, 2 and 3) with ¹³C chemical shifts measured in DMSO-d₆. Designations of deviations are the same as for Figure 5. The color code refers to the accuracy of the ¹³C NMR chemical shift prediction as follows: green = difference between theoretical and experimental < 3 ppm, yellow = difference comprised between 3 and 15 ppm, and red = difference over 15 ppm.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** ¹H and ¹³C NMR (700/175 MHz) Spectroscopic Data for 1.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">position</th><th colspan="2">1 (TFA-d)</th><th colspan="2">1 (DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>)<sup>a</sup></th></tr><tr><th>δ<sub>H</sub>, mult. (J in Hz)</th><th>δ<sub>C</sub></th><th>δ<sub>H</sub>, mult. (J in Hz)</th><th>δ<sub>C</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>170.1</td><td></td><td>161.0</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td></td><td>108.6</td><td></td><td>106.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td></td><td>158.8</td><td></td><td>156.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>7.47 (1H, s)</td><td>104.0</td><td>7.25 (1H, br s)</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4a</td><td></td><td>163.4</td><td></td><td>159.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>7.53 (1H, d, 2.2)</td><td>106.0</td><td>7.30 (1H, br s)</td><td>101.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td></td><td>169.3</td><td></td><td>165.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>8.00 (1H, d, 2.2)</td><td>122.2</td><td>7.07 (1H, br s)</td><td>112.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td></td><td>134.6</td><td></td><td>136.7</td></tr><tr><td>8a</td><td></td><td>112.7</td><td></td><td>109.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td></td><td>184.1</td><td></td><td>180.2</td></tr><tr><td>9a</td><td></td><td>110.4</td><td></td><td>107.6</td></tr><tr><td>10a</td><td></td><td>162.3</td><td></td><td>157.7</td></tr><tr><td>2-COO</td><td></td><td>176.2</td><td></td><td>168.7</td></tr><tr><td>3-CH<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>5.82 (2H, s)</td><td>73.8</td><td>5.42 (2H, s)</td><td>69.1</td></tr><tr><td>6-OCH<sub>3</sub></td><td>4.34 (3H, s)</td><td>58.1</td><td>3.98 (3H, s)</td><td>56.8</td></tr><tr><td>8-COOH</td><td></td><td>175.2</td><td></td><td>166.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup> Note that the NMR data acquired in this solvent are not secured by 2D NMR data, so some of the provided assignments may be inverted between.</footnote>
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Experimental and DFT-calculated <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shifts (ppm) for the three top-ranked candidate structures for ominoxanthone shown in Figures 5 and 6 (for clarity, the provided numbering fits the best-ranked candidate; site-by-site assignments of the two other candidate structures are given in Figure S16, Supplementary Material).</caption><thead><tr><th>Carbons</th><th>Exp. (DMSO)</th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>161.0</td><td>161.46</td><td>151.87</td><td>161.23</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>106.1</td><td>105.27</td><td>102.44</td><td>108.32</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>156.3</td><td>156.89</td><td>157.33</td><td>157.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>101.3</td><td>99.43</td><td>103.36</td><td>103.88</td></tr><tr><td>4a</td><td>159.2</td><td>158.10</td><td>167.07</td><td>154.57</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>101.4</td><td>99.28</td><td>99.24</td><td>110.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>165.5</td><td>164.28</td><td>164.21</td><td>163.65</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>112.5</td><td>115.09</td><td>114.93</td><td>109.95</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>136.7</td><td>137.15</td><td>136.96</td><td>128.13</td></tr><tr><td>8a</td><td>109.4</td><td>109.32</td><td>109.57</td><td>114.74</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>180.2</td><td>177.70</td><td>176.91</td><td>191.89</td></tr><tr><td>9a</td><td>107.6</td><td>107.02</td><td>107.32</td><td>115.48</td></tr><tr><td>10a</td><td>157.7</td><td>156.47</td><td>155.91</td><td>163.10</td></tr><tr><td>2-COO</td><td>168.7</td><td>166.94</td><td>166.62</td><td>167.46</td></tr><tr><td>3-CH<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>69.1</td><td>68.39</td><td>68.68</td><td>68.48</td></tr><tr><td>6-OCH<sub>3</sub></td><td>56.8</td><td>53.95</td><td>54.17</td><td>53.75</td></tr><tr><td>8-COOH</td><td>166.9</td><td>169.15</td><td>169.18</td><td>162.13</td></tr><tr><td>RMSD, ppm</td><td></td><td>1.66</td><td>3.59</td><td>5.48</td></tr><tr><td>Max_dev, ppm</td><td></td><td>2.83</td><td>9.12</td><td>11.64</td></tr><tr><td>R<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td>0.99921</td><td>0.99558</td><td>0.98980</td></tr></tbody></table>

The newly reported ominoxanthone represents the first example of a xanthone linearly fused to a γ-lactone nucleus. This isolate is reminiscent of anthraquinonic compounds that were previously reported from cortinariaceous sources [5]. Biosynthetic interconversions from anthraquinones to xanthones are of considerable generality [13,14,25], and as such, a demethylated analogue of noraustrocorticin can be supposed to provide a straightforward access to ominoxanthone (Figure 7). It is interesting to note that a xanthonic structure linearly fused to a pyranone ring, leprocybin, had already been reported from *Cortinarius cotoneus* by Steglich and co-workers [26]. Leprocybin also presented important structural similarities with an anthraquinone, dermolactone, that was reported a few years later by Gill and Gimenez [7].

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Plausible biosynthetic pathway for ominoxanthone (1B).</figcaption></figure>
**3. Materials and Methods**

**3.1. General Experimental Procedures**

Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were measured on a Lightwave II+ WPA 7126 V.1.6.1 spectrophotometer. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer type 257 spectrometer. ¹H and ¹³C NMR data were recorded on a Bruker 700 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm TXO cryoprobe using TFA-*d* or DMSO-*d*₆ as solvent. The solvent signals were used as references. HRESIMS measurements used an Agilent 6546 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF hyphenated with a 1290 Agilent Infinity II LC system. The chromatographic system was fitted with a Zorbax RRHD Eclipse Plus C₁₈ column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm). Sunfire preparative C₁₈ column (150 × 19 mm, i.d. 5 µm; Waters) was used for preparative HPLC separations using a Waters Delta Prep equipped with a binary pump (Waters 2525) and a UV-visible diode array detector (190–600 nm, Waters 2996). A silica 80 g Grace cartridge was used for flash chromatography with a EZPrep Combiflash chromatography flash apparatus. Chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

**3.2. Fungal Material**

Basidiomata identified in the field as *Cortinarius semisanguineus* were collected in the forest of "Rochefort-en-Yvelines" by Sidney and Jean-François Gallard and Pierre Le Pogam, Yvelines (78), France, in October 2021 (TPS agreement 995468). The first morphological identification (Pierre Le Pogam) was refined by ITS rDNA sequencing and phylogenetic analyses, which demonstrated that the collected material rather belongs to the sister species *C. ominosus sensu lato* (Jean-Michel Bellanger). Species boundaries within this *C. semisanguineus/ominosus* lineage are not easy to delineate, even with molecular tools, and the taxonomy of the complex is currently under revision (Bellanger et al., in prep). An herbarium voucher specimen (PLPA20211001) was deposited at Université Paris-Saclay.

**3.3. Extraction and Isolation**

The air-dried and powdered basidiomata (210 g) were extracted with a (1/1, *v*/*v*) mixture of DCM and MeOH (4 L, room temperature, twice). The crude extract (7.9 g) was filtered under vacuum and concentrated by rotatory evaporation. All this residue was fractionated by flash chromatography on a silica 80 g Grace cartridge using a gradient of DCM with increasing proportions of MeOH (1:0 to 0:1). The flow rate was set at 60 mL/min. The flash chromatography separation yielded 17 fractions (D1–D17) according to their TLC profiles, which were analyzed by HPLC-QTOF-HRESIMS. Fraction D14 (23 mg) was subjected to a preparative HPLC separation using a gradient of CH₃CN–H₂O with 0.1% FA (20:80 to 60:40 in 15 min) to afford ominoxanthone (1, 4 mg).

Ominoxanthone (1). Pale yellow amorphous solid. UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 251.0 (3.40), 282.0 (3.18), 310.0 (sh, 3.00), 344 (2.90) nm; IR νmax 3219, 2918, 1746, 1720, 1680, 1390, 1246 cm⁻¹; ¹H (700 MHz) and ¹³C (175 MHz) NMR in TFA-*d* and DMSO-*d*₆, see Table 1; HRESIMS *m/z* [M+H]⁺ 343.0450 (calculated for C₁₇H₁₀O₈, 343.04484). The MS/MS spectrum was deposited in the GNPS spectral library under the identifier CCMSLIB00010129052.

**3.4. CASE Analysis**

The CASE analysis was performed using the commercially available ACD/Structure Elucidator program v. 14.56 [18].

**3.5. DFT Calculations**

DFT calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 16 software package [27]. Molecular geometries of structures 1–3 were optimized with the inclusion of a DMSO molecule at the b3lyp/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. Upon geometrical optimization convergence, a frequency calculation within the harmonic approximation was conducted at the same level of theory, and local minima were characterized by the lack of imaginary frequency. The chemical shifts were calculated at the mPW1PW91/6-311+G(2d,p) level with the inclusion of the polarizable continuum model for DMSO (scrf = (solvent = dimethylsulfoxide)).
Chemical shifts were determined from the isotropic values using the following scaling factors for ¹H: slope = -1.0580 and intercept = 31.7217; for ¹³C: slope = -1.0496 and intercept = 186.2534 [28].

**4. Conclusions**

We herein elucidated and validated, through CASE and DFT strategies, the structure of ominoxanthone as a new subtype of xanthone. The structure of this compound is strongly reminiscent of that of the anthraquinonic noraustrocorticin and austrocorticin, the first examples of anthraquinone being linearly fused with a γ-lactone moiety, which had also been isolated from a *Cortinarius* sp.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28041557/s1, Figures S1–S12: HRESIMS, 1D and 2D NMR data of 1 in TFA-*d* and DMSO-*d*<sub>6</sub>; Figure S13: CASE outcomes obtained from the Molecular Connectivity Diagram resulting from TFA-*d* analyses of 1; Figure S14: Molecular Connectivity Diagram adapted to DMSO-*d*<sub>6</sub> NMR signals of 1; Figure S15: Molecular Connectivity Diagram (MCD) obtained from the NMR data acquired in DMSO-*d*<sub>6</sub>; Figure S16: Experimental and DFT-calculated ¹³C chemical shifts (ppm), RMSD and max_δ for three top-ranked CASE-deduced candidates for 1.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, M.A.B., A.V.B., M.E.E., and P.L.P.; investigation, A.T., and C.I.; formal analysis, M.A.B., J.-M.B., J.-F.G., A.V.B., M.E.E. and P.L.P.; validation, A.V.B. and M.E.E.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L.P.; writing—review and editing, M.A.B., A.V.B. and M.E.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

**Acknowledgments:** This study was supported by a sponsorship from Université Paris-Saclay and CNRS. We express our thanks to Karine Leblanc (BioCIS) and Somia Rharrabti (BioCIS) for her assistance in the preparative HPLC purifications.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**Sample Availability:** Samples of compound **1** are not available from the authors.

**References**

1. Orango-Bourdette, J.O.; Beniddir, M.A.; Otogo N'Nang, E.; Gallard, J.-F.; Ondo, J.P.; Sima Obiang, C.; Rharrabti, S.; Miel, C.; Denis, S.; Obame Engonga, L.C.; et al. Structure Elucidation of a New Lanostane Triterpene from Gabonese *Ganoderma orbiforme* Fruiting Bodies. *Magn. Reson. Chem.* **2021**, *59*, 1165–1170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. DNP. Available online: http://dnp.chemnetbase.com/ (accessed on 30 October 2021).

3. Gill, M. Pigments of Australasian *Dermocybe* Toadtools. *Aust. J. Chem.* **1995**, *48*, 1–26. [CrossRef]

4. Gill, M. Pigments of Fungi (Macromycetes). *Nat. Prod. Rep.* **2003**, *20*, 615–639. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Gill, M.; Giménez, A. Pigments of Fungi. Part 11.(+)-Austrocorticin, Austrocorticinic Acid, Austrocorticone, and Related Pigments; the First Naturally Occurring Anthraquinones Derived from a Propionate-Triggered Octaketide. *J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1* **1990**, 1159–1167. [CrossRef]

6. Thomas, R. A Biosynthetic Classification of Fungal and Streptomycete Fused-Ring Aromatic Polyketides. *ChemBioChem* **2001**, *2*, 612–627. [CrossRef]

7. Gill, M.; Giménez, A. Pigments of Fungi. Part 17. (S)-(+)-Dermochrysone, (+)-Dermolactone, Dermoquinone, and Related Pigments; New Nonaketides from the Fungus *Dermocybe sanguinea* (Sensu Cleland). *J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1* **1990**, 2585–2591. [CrossRef]

8. Steglich, W.; Reininger, W. Pilzpigmente, IX. Anthrachinon-Pigmente Aus *Dermocybe cinnabarina* (Fr.) Wünsche. *Chem. Ber.* **1972**, *105*, 2922–2927. [CrossRef]

9. Li, X.; Li, X.-M.; Wang, B.-G. Structural Revision of Wentiquinone C and Related Congeners from Anthraquinones to Xanthones Using Chemical Derivatization and NMR Analysis. *Mar. Drugs* **2018**, *17*, 8. [CrossRef]

10. Sun, H.-F.; Li, X.-M.; Meng, L.-H.; Cui, C.-M.; Gao, S.-S.; Li, C.-S.; Wang, B.-G. Two New Secoanthraquinone Derivatives from the Marine-Derived Endophytic Fungus *Aspergillus wentii* EN-48. *Helv. Chim. Acta* **2013**, *96*, 458–462. [CrossRef]
11. Li, X.; Li, X.-M.; Xu, G.-M.; Li, C.-S.; Wang, B.-G. Antioxidant Metabolites from Marine Alga-Derived Fungus *Aspergillus wentii* EN-48. *Phytochem. Lett.* **2014**, *7*, 120–123. [CrossRef]

12. Shen, Y.; Xu, Q.L.; Cheng, P.; Liu, C.L.; Lu, Z.Y.; Li, W.; Wang, T.T.; Lu, Y.H.; Tan, R.X.; Ge, H.M. Aromatic Polyketides from a Caterpillar Associated *Alternaria* sp. *Tetrahedron Lett.* **2017**, *58*, 3069–3072. [CrossRef]

13. Abdissa, N.; Heydenreich, M.; Midiwo, J.O.; Ndakala, A.; Majer, Z.; Neumann, B.; Stammler, H.-G.; Sewald, N.; Yenesew, A. A Xanthone and a Phenylanthraquinone from the Roots of *Bulbine frutescens*, and the Revision of Six *Seco*-Anthraquinones into Xanthones. *Phytochem. Lett.* **2014**, *9*, 67–73. [CrossRef]

14. Yang, B.-J.; Chen, G.-D.; Li, Y.-J.; Hu, D.; Guo, L.-D.; Xiong, P.; Gao, H. A New Xanthone Glycoside from the Endolichenic Fungus *Sporormiella irregularis*. *Molecules* **2016**, *21*, 764. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. White, K.N.; Amagata, T.; Oliver, A.G.; Tenney, K.; Wenzel, P.J.; Crews, P. Structure Revision of Spiroleucettadine, a Sponge Alkaloid with a Bicyclic Core Meager in H-Atoms. *J. Org. Chem.* **2008**, *73*, 8719–8722. [CrossRef]

16. Sidebottom, P.J. Crews' Rule—Still Useful but Often Misquoted. *Magn. Reson. Chem.* **2021**, *59*, 752–753. [CrossRef]

17. Elyashberg, M.; Argyropoulos, D. Computer Assisted Structure Elucidation (CASE): Current and Future Perspectives. *Magn. Reson. Chem.* **2021**, *59*, 669–690. [CrossRef]

18. ACD. *Structure Elucidator*; V.14.56; Advanced Chemistry Development Inc.: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2020.

19. Elyashberg, M.E.; Williams, A.; Blinov, K. *Contemporary Computer-Assisted Approaches to Molecular Structure Elucidation*; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2011.

20. Elyashberg, M.E.; Williams, A.J.; Martin, G.E. Computer-Assisted Structure Verification and Elucidation Tools in NMR-Based Structure Elucidation. *Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.* **2008**, *53*, 1–104. [CrossRef]

21. Buevich, A.V.; Elyashberg, M.E. Synergistic Combination of CASE Algorithms and DFT Chemical Shift Predictions: A Powerful Approach for Structure Elucidation, Verification, and Revision. *J. Nat. Prod.* **2016**, *79*, 3105–3116. [CrossRef]

22. Buevich, A.V.; Elyashberg, M.E. Towards Unbiased and More Versatile NMR-Based Structure Elucidation: A Powerful Combination of CASE Algorithms and DFT Calculations. *Magn. Reson. Chem.* **2018**, *56*, 493–504. [CrossRef]

23. Ezell, E.L.; Smith, L.L. ¹H-and ¹³C-NMR Spectra of Camptothecin and Derivatives. *J. Nat. Prod.* **1991**, *54*, 1645–1650. [CrossRef]

24. Räisänen, R. Fungal Colorants in Applications—Focus on *Cortinarius* Species. *Color. Technol.* **2019**, *135*, 22–31. [CrossRef]

25. Le Pogam, P.; Boustie, J. Xanthones of Lichen Source: A 2016 Update. *Molecules* **2016**, *21*, 294. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26. Kopanski, L.; Klaar, M.; Steglich, W. Pilzpigmente, 40. Leprocybin, Der Fluoreszenzstoff von *Cortinarius cotoneus* Und Verwandten Leprocyben (Agaricales). *Liebigs Ann. Chem.* **1982**, *1982*, 1280–1296. [CrossRef]

27. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. *Gaussian*; 16, Revision A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016.

28. CHESHIRE. CHEmical SHift REpository with Coupling Constants Added Too. Available online: http://cheshirenmr.info (accessed on 5 January 2023).

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.