<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Notch Activation in Asymmetrically Dividing Sensory Organ Precursor Cells in Drosophila melanogaster Epithelium

Mathieu Pinot, Roland Le Borgne

► To cite this version:

Mathieu Pinot, Roland Le Borgne. Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Notch Activation in Asymmetrically Dividing Sensory Organ Precursor Cells in Drosophila melanogaster Epithelium. Cells, 2024, 13 (13), pp.1133. 10.3390/cells13131133. [hal-04649775](https://hal.science/hal-04649775v1)

HAL Id: hal-04649775

https://hal.science/hal-04649775v1

Submitted on 16 Jul 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Review

# Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Notch Activation in Asymmetrically Dividing Sensory Organ Precursor Cells in *Drosophila melanogaster* Epithelium

Mathieu Pinot and Roland Le Borgne *

Univ Rennes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 6290, IGDR (Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes), F-35000 Rennes, France

* Correspondence: roland.leborgne@univ-rennes1.fr; Tel.: +33-223-234-894

**Abstract:** The Notch communication pathway, discovered in *Drosophila* over 100 years ago, regulates a wide range of intra-lineage decisions in metazoans. The division of the *Drosophila* mechanosensory organ precursor is the archetype of asymmetric cell division in which differential Notch activation takes place at cytokinesis. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms by which epithelial cell polarity, cell cycle and intracellular trafficking participate in controlling the directionality, subcellular localization and temporality of mechanosensitive Notch receptor activation in cytokinesis.

**Keywords:** Notch signaling; asymmetric cell division; cell fate determinants; cell polarity; epithelial cells; *Drosophila melanogaster*

## 1. Introduction

Notch is the receptor of an evolutionarily conserved cell-cell signaling pathway. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, it is regulating a large number of developmental processes, whose deregulation is at the root of many developmental disorders, congenital disorders as well as tumoral and non-tumoral pathologies (for reviews see reviews [1–6]). At the cellular and tissue level, Notch plays a central role in cell fate acquisition.

A very well-characterized example of Notch-dependent fate decisions comes from studies carried out on mechanosensory organs (SOs) present on the dorsal thorax of *Drosophila* pupae, called pupal notum [7–9]. The notum is a single-layer epithelium composed of epidermal cells and SOs. Epidermal cells divide symmetrically within the plane of the epithelium to give rise to two identical daughter cells, a process allowing an increase in epithelia surface. The cell divisions giving rise to SOs are governed by complex mechanisms. Each SO is produced by a single precursor, the sensory organ precursor (SOP), that is selected within a group of equipotent cells, the proneural cluster [10]. This selection occurs thanks to Notch-mediated lateral inhibition [10]. The SOP divides within the plane of the epithelium and along the antero-posterior axis of the pupae to generate a larger posterior cell and a smaller anterior cell [7,8,11]. The identity of daughter cells is reliant on the unequal segregation of two cell fate determinants in the anterior cell, Numb and Neur [12,13]. Neuralized (Neur) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that positively regulates the activity of the Notch ligands by endocytosis [13–16]. Numb is a membrane-associated phosphotyrosine protein that inhibits Notch signaling by regulating endosomal sorting of Notch [17–19]. As a consequence of unequal partitioning of Neur and Numb, Notch is activated in the posterior cell that adopts the pIIa fate, while its daughter cell adopts the pIIb fate. The pIIb cell is the precursor of the two internal cells, whereas pIIa will give rise to the external cells of sensory organs, respectively [7,8]. Thanks to sophisticated genetic toolboxes including unbiased genetic screens and genome manipulation/genome editing, coupled with cell biology approaches which include non-invasive and quantitative live-imaging, the apparently simple model of the SOP has made it possible to lay the foundation

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Pinot, M.; Le Borgne, R. Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Notch Activation in Asymmetrically Dividing Sensory Organ Precursor Cells in *Drosophila melanogaster* Epithelium. *Cells* **2024**, *13*, 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13131133

Academic Editor: Anette Preiss

Received: 31 May 2024

Revised: 24 June 2024

Accepted: 25 June 2024

Published: 30 June 2024

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
for a number of fundamental processes required for directionality in Notch-dependent fate acquisition. Deciphering this mechanism in *D. melanogaster* also became an archetype for the understanding of the molecular mechanism governing the establishment of cell identity following the asymmetric cell division of progenitor cells in other species and tissues [20,21].

The current knowledge addressing the mechanisms leading to the selection of SOP and the regulation of the antero-posterior orientation of SOP division have been nicely presented in excellent recent reviews [9,22] and will not be covered in this review article. Here, we will first introduce the basic principles of Notch signaling and asymmetric cell division (ACD), to then review and discuss the current knowledge addressing the following questions, 1. how asymmetry of cell fate determinants is established at SOP mitosis and biases signaling at cytokinesis, 2. how epithelial cell-cell contacts are remodeled throughout SOP division to maintain tissue integrity while assembling a signaling interface between daughter cells, and 3. how polarized trafficking and endocytosis of Notch signaling components are regulated at the signaling interface, and all this to illustrate how these events are coordinated in time and space to ensure fidelity and robustness in the pIIa/pIIb binary fate decision.

## 2. Discovery and Overview of the Notch Signaling Pathway

The origins of the Notch pathway lie in the pioneering work of T.H. Morgan and D.F. Poulson in *Drosophila*, with the identification of small deficiencies on the X chromosome, which in heterozygous females were giving rise to serrations on the wing, hence the name *Notch* [23,24]. Notch is characterized as a dominant haplo-insufficient mutation. Embryonic lethality is caused by serious developmental disturbances, among which is hypertrophy and disorganization of the nervous system (ref. [23]; for review, see [1]). The latter, named the neurogenic phenotype, is a consequence of a switch of fate of epidermal precursors into neuroblasts that continue their normal differentiation, causing the hypertrophy of the nervous system [25]. Unbiased genetic approaches then further demonstrated the powerfulness of the *Drosophila model*, as illustrated by the screening of embryonic phenotypes that led to the identification of a group of six loci exhibiting neurogenic phenotypes reminiscent of that seen in *Notch* mutant embryos [26,27]. These loci included *Delta*, encoding a type I transmembrane protein, one of the Notch ligands, *Enhancer of Split* (*E(Spl)*), encoding a helix-loop-helix Notch target, the transcriptional co-activator *mastermind* (*mam*), *big brain* (*bib*), encoding a nonselective cation channel of the aquaporin family, and the E3 ligase *neuralized* (*neur*), which are directly implicated in the core Notch signaling pathway (Figure 1). Within the same decade, the *Notch* coding gene was isolated and sequenced revealing Notch to be a large cell surface, single-pass type I glycoprotein containing epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats in its extracellular domain [28–30]. In the late 1980s, Notch orthologs were identified in *Caenorhabditis elegans*, which, as in *Drosophila*, have been shown to be essential for cell interactions and cell fate specifications during worm development [31–35]. Vertebrate *Notch* receptors were identified and cloned shortly after [36,37], demonstrating that Notch is a conserved communication pathway in metazoans. Advances in gene cloning, unbiased genetic screens in *Drosophila* and *C. elegans* coupled with biochemical and cell biology approaches in vertebrate cells have enabled the Notch signaling pathway to be characterized at both cellular and molecular levels.

Thus, the work carried out by a scientific community of researchers has led to the characterization of the Notch-dependent pleiotropic cell-cell communication pathway schematized in Figure 1. It is striking to note that the main components of the Notch pathway have been conserved over the course of evolution (Table 1). Notch signaling is essentially paracrine as its ligands of the DSL (for Delta and Serrate from *Drosophila* and Lag2 from *C. elegans*) family are also transmembrane proteins. The Notch receptor is activated by DSL ligands present at the surface of adjacent cells, referred to as signal-sending cells. In the receiving cell, signal activation involves three successive cleavages (for review see [38,39]). Notch is first processed in the *trans*-Golgi network by the Furin endoprotease to generate
a functional heterodimeric receptor (S1 cleavage) [40]. In *Drosophila*, unlike in mammals, Notch at the plasma membrane is full-length and the S1 cleavage is dispensable for its activity [41]. A second ligand-induced cleavage of Notch at the extracellular S2 site by the ADAM/TACE Kuzbanian generates a membrane-bound activated form [42,43] which then undergoes an intramembranous cleavage at the S3 site by the g-secretase complex [44–46]. This last cleavage leads to the releasing of the active Notch intracellular domain (NICD) that is prone to be translocated to the nucleus, where it interacts with a DNA-binding protein called CSL (for human, CBF1; *Drosophila*, Suppressor of Hairless; *C. elegans*, Lag-1) to regulate the transcription of target genes [47,48] (Figure 1, Table 1).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Overview of the Notch pathway in *Drosophila*. The Notch pathway is a paracrine communication pathway involving Delta (red), the transmembrane ligand expressed and localized at the plasma membrane of the so-called signal-emitting cell, depicted in red. Delta interacts in trans with the Notch receptor (blue), localized at the plasma membrane of the signal-receiving cell, depicted in blue. Following ligand binding, Notch undergoes two successive proteolytic cleavages. The first cleavage at S2 is ligand-induced and generates an activated membrane form of Notch, which is then processed at S3 by the γ-secretase complex. This leads to the release of NICD, its translocation into the nucleus, and association with the transcriptional co-activator Mastermind and the DNA-binding transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)), resulting in transcriptional activation.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Core components of the Notch signaling pathway, adapted from [39].</caption><thead><tr><th>Function</th><th>Type</th><th>Invertebrates<br>(Drosophila)</th><th>Vertebrates<br>(Mammals)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Receptor</td><td></td><td>Notch</td><td>Notch 1, 2, 3 and 4</td></tr><tr><td>Ligand</td><td></td><td>Delta<br>Serrate</td><td>Dll1, 3 and 4<br>Jagged1 and 2</td></tr><tr><td>Nuclear effectors</td><td>CSL DNA-binding<br>transcription factor<br>Transcriptional coactivator</td><td>Su(H)<br>Mastermind</td><td>RBPjk/CBF-1<br>MAML1-3</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** *Cont.*</caption><thead><tr><th>Function</th><th>Type</th><th>Invertebrates (Drosophila)</th><th>Vertebrates (Mammals)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Receptor proteolysis</td><td>Site 1 cleavage<br>Site 2 cleavage<br>Site 3 cleavage</td><td>Kuzbanian<br>Kuzbanian-like; TACE<br>Presenlin, Nicastrin<br>APH-1, PEN-2</td><td>PC5/6, Furin<br>ADAM10/Kuzbanian<br>ADAM17/TACE<br>Presenlin 1 and 2,<br>Nicastrin<br>APH-1a-c, PEN-2</td></tr><tr><td>Membrane trafficking</td><td>E3 Ubiquitin ligase<br>Negative regulators<br>Neuralized inhibitors<br>others</td><td>Mindbomb 1 and 2<br>Neuralized<br>Numb<br>Bearbed, Tom, M4<br>Sanpodo</td><td>Mindbomb, Skeletrophin<br>Neuralized 1 and 2<br>Numb, Numb-like, ACBD3</td></tr><tr><td>Canonical target bHLH repressor genes</td><td></td><td>E(spl)</td><td>HES/ESR/HEY</td></tr></tbody></table>

This mode of cell–cell paracrine communication is used repeatedly throughout development, especially in epithelial tissues [1,2]. The sequence of events leading to Notch activation requires key regulators combined with coordinated intracellular trafficking, so that the ligand can interact in trans with the receptor in the right place and at the right time. As we will describe in the following paragraphs, this spatio-temporal regulation has been particularly well characterized in SOPs, progenitors which divide asymmetrically to generate two distinct daughter cells, whose identity is solely governed by Delta/Notch communication.

### 3. Establishment of the Asymmetry of Cell Fate Determinants

#### 3.1. *From Polarization to Asymmetric Division of Sensory Organ Precursor Cells*

SOP division is a well-studied model of asymmetric cell division (ACD), a process by which cell diversity is generated throughout development [7,9]. During ACD, a mother cell divides to generate two daughter cells with distinct identities and developmental potential. Asymmetry often relies on the unequal distribution of cell fate determinants, and its fundamental principles were to a large extent established in the models of the one-cell *Caenorhabditis elegans* embryo and *Drosophila* neuroblasts [49–52]. ACD can be subdivided into three steps: (1) the mother cell polarizes before entering mitosis; (2) cortical polarization dictates the asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants at one pole of the mother cell in the form of a calotte, a.k.a. as a crescent because of its characteristic cross-sectional shape; and then (3) the mitotic spindle aligns with the middle of the crescent of cell fate determinants, leading to their unequal segregation in only one of the daughter cells at cytokinesis. Consequently, cell fate determinants regulate the acquisition of cell fate in each of the daughter cells by their presence or absence.

#### 3.2. *Polarization Drives Asymmetric Localization of Cell Fate Determinants*

While the SOP in the pupal notum follows these basic rules as it asymmetrically divides, leading to the unequal partitioning of the two cell fate determinants Numb and Neur, there is an additional layer of complexity, related to the fact that SOPs are epithelial cells (Figure 2). SOPs are surrounded by and tightly bound to neighboring epidermal cells by cell–cell junctions, the apical adherens junctions (AJs) and the lateral septate junctions (SJs), which act as mechanical and paracellular diffusion barriers, respectively [9,53–55] (Figure 2B). Thus, SOPs are subjected to two types of polarization: (1) at the tissue scale, where planar cell polarity (PCP) mediated by Frizzled signaling orients SOP division along the antero-posterior axis [11,56]; (2) at the cellular level, where apical–basal polarity establishment and maintenance depends on the activity of cortical polarity proteins. Apical to AJ, the PAR complex is localized, composed of Bazooka (Baz, the *Drosophila* Par3)–
DmPar6 (Par6)-atypical PKC (aPKC) complex, and localized at the SJ are Discs-large (Dlg) and Scribble (Scrib), which cooperate with Lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl) [57,58]. During SOP mitosis, the asymmetric localization of Numb and Neuralized requires the remodeling of the polarity modules with the Baz-Par6-aPKC complex localizing at the posterior apico-lateral cortex, while, on a mutually exclusive basis, Dlg together with Partner of Inscuteable (Pins) accumulate at the anterior lateral cortex [54] (Figure 2C,C').

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Figure 2.** Asymmetric division of the SOP and site of Notch activation in cytokinesis. (A) Three-dimensional view of the dorsal thorax pupal notum, a single-layer epithelium composed of epidermal cells and SOPs (red cells). Adherens junctions labelled by E-cadherin (green) are localized apically and delimit the contour of epithelial cells. SOPs are regularly spaced thanks to Notch-dependent lateral inhibition. (B–D) High magnifications of the SOP in interphase (B), during mitosis (C) and at mitosis exit once the SOP daughters, the anterior pIIB (red) and posterior pIIa (blue) cells, are formed (D). (B') Schematic representation of the SOP in interphase illustrating the position of cell–cell junctions, adherens junctions (AJs, green) and septate junctions (SJs, blue). PCP-dependent planar asymmetry of Baz-aPKC-Par6 (magenta) is initiated prior to mitosis. (C') Schematic representation of the SOP in prometaphase. The PCP complex (Fz-Dsh) localized at the posterior apical cortex, together with the Baz-aPKC-Par6 polarity complex, (magenta) while Pins-Dlg co-localize with Numb and Neur at the antero-basal cortex (green). Mud interacts with Pins at the anterior basal cortex, and with Fz-Dsh at the antero-posterior cortex. In turn, Mud, by interacting with the Dynein complex, causes the spindle to orient along the anterior–posterior axis with a slight apical–basal tilt of the spindle. (D') schematic representation of the pIIa-pIIB SOP daughter cells. The apical–basal polarity of the SOP daughter is preserved despite the polarity remodeling that has taken place in mitosis. However, specific to pIIa-pIIB cells (not seen following cytokinesis of epidermal cells) is the assembly of Baz clusters at the apical and the lateral interface. (E) Baz clusters contain Notch, Delta and Spdo, and Baz activity is required for efficient Notch signaling. (F) Photo-tracking of NICD revealed that the main contributors in Notch signaling originates from the basal pool of Notch (arrow). While the apical pool also contributes to Notch signaling, it remains to be determined if proteolytic activation occurs directly at the apical plasma membrane or if it is relocated from the apical to basal plasma membrane (dotted arrow).
The assembly of the Baz-Par6-aPKC complex was shown to be regulated by Aurora A-dependent phosphorylation, leading to the proposal that the complex forms and localizes at the posterior cortex upon the entry into mitosis [59]. However, this view was revisited using real-time analyses, revealing that the Baz-Par6-aPKC complex occurs independently of AurA before entry into mitosis, and its location at the posterior pole is regulated by PCP [60]. It is interesting to note that while in interphase, the Par complex is restricted apically above the AJs, while upon entry into prophase, it extends laterally at the level of the AJs and SJs, suggesting a change in the cortical polarity at mitosis entry [54,60]. During mitosis, the Par complex exerts at least two functions. The first one is the aPKC-dependent phosphorylation of Numb, preventing it from localizing at the posterior cortex [61]. As a result, Numb is exclusively localized at the anterior cortex. It remains to be determined whether Neur-dependent phosphorylation of aPKC explains its unequal distribution. The second function of the Par complex, also mediated by aPKC-dependent phosphorylation, consists in restricting the function of the tumor-suppressor gene Lgl, required for Neur and Numb asymmetric localization, to the anterior cortex [62].

# 4. Remodeling of Cell-Cell Contacts during SOP Cytokinesis

## 4.1. Alignment of the Mitotic Spindle with Cortical Polarity

At SOP prometaphase, the mutual exclusion of Pins/Dlg and the Baz-Par6-aPKC module sets the asymmetric localization of Numb and Neur [54]. Then, the SOP divides along the a-p axis, a process relying on PCP to allow unequal partitioning of fate determinants [11,56]. This implies a coupling between mitotic spindle orientation and cortical polarity determinants to drive the unequal partitioning of Numb and Neur in the pIIB cell. At the anterior cortex, a complex composed of Pins, Mud and Dynein exerts pulling forces on astral microtubules [63–65]. Phosphorylation of Pins by aPKC and AurA is proposed to regulate the localization of this complex [66–68]. In symmetrically dividing epidermal cells, apical aPKC excludes Pins from the apical cortex, an activity needed to orient the spindle within the plane of the epithelium [67]. Based on these observations, in dividing SOP, by phosphorylating Pins at the posterior cortex, aPKC is proposed to induce Pins posterior exclusion. On the other hand, AurA, by phosphorylating Pins, may promote the localization of Pins-Dlg in the anterior cortex. In addition to these anterior cortical processes, the posteriorly localized Fz receptor and Dishevelled (Dsh), two core components of PCP signaling, recruit the Mud-Dynein complex to stabilize astral spindle microtubules in the posterior apical cortex [65,69]. This appears to be a cell cycle-regulated process as Cyclin A, the major cyclin driving the transition to the M-phase of the cell cycle, is recruited at the posterior cortex by Fz-Dsh in prophase. Cyclin A is in turn required for Mud-Dynein recruitment at the posterior apical cortex [70]. Thus, Pins and Fz-Dsh inputs in the anterior and posterior cortex, respectively, are responsible for recruiting the Mud-Dynein complex to ensure spindle orientation along the a-p axis and to couple the spindle orientation to the asymmetric localization of fate determinants. As the cortical domain of Pins-Dlg is located basally relative to the apical Fz-Dsh complex, the mitotic spindle is not parallel to the plane of the epithelium, as is the case in epidermal cells, but it is tilted towards the antero-basal pole [54]. In cytokinesis, because the cleavage furrow is positioned orthogonally to the mitotic spindle, one of the consequences of this spindle tilt is the formation of an anterior cell with a smaller apical pole compared to its posterior sister cell. In addition, the Lgl-dependent posterior enrichment of Rac and Cdc42 promotes a higher level of branched actin in the posterior cortex of the SOP, contributing to produce two daughter cells with distinct volumes [71].

## 4.2. Activation of Notch Takes Place during SOP Cytokinesis

The generation of fully functional versions of Notch whose cytoplasmic domain was fused to GFP (NiGFP) was instrumental in determining the dynamics of Notch localization and signaling throughout SOP mitosis [72,73]. This elegant study from F. Schweisguth's laboratory first revealed that low levels of NiGFP are detected in dividing SOPs and
at the pIIa-pIIb interface compared with those detected between two epidermal cells. Second, NiGFP is best detected at the apical pIIa-pIIb interface, but is also present along the lateral interface 10 min after the onset of anaphase. Third, following the ligand-mediated proteolytic cleavage by g-secretase, the processed intracellular domain of Notch (NICD) fused to GFP is detected in the nucleus. Time-lapse imaging indicates that there is a progressive increase in NiGFP in pIIa nuclei, reaching a plateau 30 min after the onset of anaphase [72]. Nuclear NiGFP levels correlate with the Notch transcriptional response detected using a functional GFP-tagged *E(spl)M8-HLH* reporter [73]. Nuclear NiGFP is not detected in the pIIb cell and the ratio of nuclear NiGFP in pIIa to pIIb cells increased over time. Hence, the functional NiGFP allowed Notch activation to be monitored in vivo to determine that the directionality of Notch activation is established shortly after anaphase [72,73].

This study raised the fundamental question of the site of Notch activation, particularly as SOPs and their daughters express low levels of Delta and Notch compared with epidermal cells. Based on the SOP-specific expression of Neur and the unequal partitioning of Neur in the pIIb cell, it is generally viewed that pIIb is the main source of ligand-activating Notch in the pIIa cell [74], reducing the system to a private cell-cell communication between pIIb and pIIa, surrounded by epidermal cells that are ‘passive’ in terms of pIIa-pIIb fate acquisition. Among other issues, this raises the question of the polarized and coordinated transport of Delta and Notch to the pIIa-pIIb interface in cytokinesis, and their ability to interact in trans. Indeed, based on the fact that Delta and Notch are expressed at low levels and that their time residency at the plasma membrane is short, the possibility that a Delta from the pIIb cell might encounter a Notch on the surface of the pIIa cell seems akin to looking for a needle in a haystack. Membrane trafficking regulators are part of the answer (see also the paragraph on the additional contribution of membrane traffic in binary cell fate acquisition). For example, analyses of the borders of clones of cells expressing Notch-GFP indicate that Notch is selectively targeted towards the pIIa-pIIb interface at cytokinesis [55]. The clathrin adaptor AP-1 complex and stratum, a binding partner of Rab8, act upon the exit of the Golgi apparatus to regulate the transport of Notch and Sanpodo (Spdo)—a Notch interactor specifically expressed in SOPs and daughter cells (see below)—towards the basolateral plasma membrane [75–77]. However, while polarized trafficking of course plays an important role, as we shall see in the following paragraphs, the remodeling of polarity modules in the dividing SOP, unequal partitioning of cell fate determinants and the activity of Spdo play a major role in the directionality, timing and subcellular site of Notch activation.

### 4.3. Assembly of the Notch Signalling Interface at SOP Cytokinesis

One of the remarkable features of proliferative epithelia, such as the pupal notum, is that the SOPs and epidermal cells divide without the tissue tearing. Analyses of the dynamics of the main components of the AJ and SJ showed that, when epidermal and SOP cells divide, the junctional complexes are remodeled without any loss of integrity of the epithelial barrier functions [53,78,79]. One of the characteristics of epithelial divisions is the formation of a characteristic long contact interface between daughter cells. The junction remodeling is particularly important at the cleavage furrow, where cell junctions with neighboring cells are disassembled to enable the subsequent assembly of cell-cell junctions between daughter cells [53,79]. While the remodeling of AJ and SJ during SOP cytokinesis is similar to that of epidermal cells, the asymmetric distribution of the Par complex and Pins-Dlg modules at mitosis results in an atypical polarity of the nascent pIIa-pIIb interface [55]. During cytokinesis, following AurA degradation, the Baz-Par6-aPKC complex is disassembled. Numb and Neuralized are released from the anterior cortex to regulate the activity of Notch and its ligands [19]. On their side, aPKC and Par6 are localized apically above the AJ, while Baz is relocalized at the SOP daughter cell interface in the form of apical and lateral clusters [55] (Figure 2D,D'). The formation of Baz apical and lateral clusters is unique to the SOP daughter interface and not observed in epidermal cells [55].
Interestingly, clonal analyses using Notch-GFP revealed that Notch is preferentially targeted to the pIIa-pIIb interface, where it localizes in dotted structures [55,72]. Interestingly, these structures colocalize with Baz. Baz appears to assemble clusters independently of Notch, while Notch clustering requires Baz [55]. Baz activity, in addition to being necessary for cluster assembly, contributes to the activation of Notch signaling. Spdo is also located in the Baz-Notch clusters and Spdo activity is required for their formation. Numb, which inhibits Notch, is not detected in Baz-Notch clusters. In contrast, Neuralized, which activates Delta signaling, is localized in these clusters, and Delta and Neur activities regulate the assembly and stability of Baz-Spdo-Notch clusters [55] (Figure 2E).

Collectively, these data raise the possibility that Baz-Spdo-Notch-Neur clusters correspond to the sites where Delta can activate Notch in trans at cytokinesis.

**5. Role of Polarized Trafficking and Endocytosis in Notch Activation**

**5.1. Site of Production of the Notch Intracellular Domain (NICD)**

As we have just seen, during cytokinesis, the two pools of Notch are at the pIIa-pIIb interface, one apical at the level of the AJs and the other located more basally under the midbody (Figure 2E). While both pools of Notch are positive for Baz-Spdo and Neur and transient [55], their contribution to Notch signaling appears to differ. Selective photo-bleaching (of NiGFP) or photoconversion (of NimMaple3) of the apical versus basal pool of Notch revealed that nuclear Notch primarily originates from the basally located Notch receptor [73]. While the basal pool of Notch is the major contributor to Notch activation, it appears that the apical pool also participates in NICD production [55,73,76]. However, it remains to be determined whether NICD is produced directly from the apical pIIa-pIIb interface or whether basolateral relocation is a prerequisite. Indeed, several arguments further support the notion that the basal pool is the main site of Notch activation. First, in *numb* mutant cells, Notch accumulates basally during cytokinesis, likely contributing to the ectopic activation of Notch in the pIIb daughter cell (see below, [72,73,80]). Second, newly synthesized Delta is primarily detected along the basal pIIa-pIIb interface, where it resides for a short period of time. Preventing Delta endocytosis by overexpressing an inhibitor of Neuralized activity leads to the accumulation of Delta mainly at the basal interface [73]. This indicates that Neuralized-mediated endocytosis of Delta, and hence activation of Notch in the pIIa cells, takes place from the basolateral membrane. Third, upon the blockade of g-secretase cleavage in *Presenilin* mutant cells, the unprocessed Notch localizes at the basal interface [73]. Having defined the site of Notch activation, in the next two paragraphs we will describe how cell fate determinants ensure the directionality of Notch signaling.

**5.2. Mechanism of Notch Inhibition by Numb in the pIIb Cell**

Numb is a ubiquitous conserved protein containing a phospho-tyrosine binding domain, localizing in endosomes and uniformly at the cell cortex of interphase epithelial cells [19,61,81,82]. Numb was the first cell fate determinant related to the Notch pathway to be identified [12]. In *numb* mutants, the SOP divides symmetrically into two pIIa cells, while overexpression of Numb in the SOP leads to the opposite cell fate transformation, e.g., two pIIb cells, indicating that Numb represses Notch activation. In a mitotic SOP, Numb is located asymmetrically in the antero-basal cortex of the cell and is inherited by the pIIb cell [12]. Numb binds to and polarizes the distribution of a-Adaptin (a-Ada)—one of the four subunits of the AP-2 complex involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis—at the anterior cortex of dividing SOPs [83] (Figure 3A). The fact that mutant forms of a-Ada unable to bind to Numb cause *numb*-like phenotype and that Numb was reported to bind to the intracellular domain of Notch led to a model stating that Numb prevents Notch activation in the pIIb cell by mediating Notch endocytosis, i.e., the removal of Notch from the plasma membrane [17,83,84]. The identification of *spdo*, a gene that specifically regulates Notch-dependent asymmetric divisions, called into question the direct interaction between Numb and Notch [85,86]. Indeed, Spdo encodes a four-pass transmembrane
protein that physically interacts with Numb, with the intracellular domain of Notch as well as with Presenilin, one subunit of the g-secretase complex, the Notch cleaving enzyme [87]. Spdo localizes at the plasma membrane in the pIIa cell where it facilitates the g-secretase cleavage of Notch and is required to specify the Notch-dependent fate of the pIIa cell. In contrast, in the pIIb cell, Numb prevents Notch signaling by inhibiting Spdo-Notch plasma membrane localization [18,19,85–89]. In addition, independently of its role in Numb localization, Lgl also inhibits the plasma membrane localization of Spdo in the pIIb cell [62]. The live-imaging of GFP-labelled Numb and Spdo revealed that during SOP cytokinesis Numb is relocated from the basal cortex to apically located endosomes in pIIb cells [19]. Endocytosis assays revealed that Spdo is internalized and accumulates with Numb in these endosomes. Importantly, GFP-tagged Notch also distributes in these apical sorting endosomes at cytokinesis, in a Numb-dependent manner [19]. Although Numb-AP-2 interaction is required for the cell fate acquisition and AP-2 is required for Spdo endocytosis, Spdo and Notch endocytosis are independent of Numb [18,19]. These data demonstrated that Numb does not regulate the distribution of Spdo and Notch via their endocytosis. Interestingly, Numb was shown to control post-endocytic trafficking and degradation of Notch in vertebrates and negatively regulate basolateral recycling in *C. elegans* [90,91]. Similarly, in *Drosophila* Numb genetically and physically interacts with the Clathrin adaptor AP-1 complex, a complex regulating the basolateral recycling of Spdo [75]. Accordingly, in a *numb* mutant sensory organ, Spdo is efficiently internalized and recycled back to the plasma membrane instead of being sorted towards late endosomes for degradation [18,19]. These data gave rise to a model according to which Numb binds to Notch-Spdo in apical endosomes and inhibits their recycling to the plasma membrane in an AP-1-dependent manner, and by so doing, Numb generates an asymmetry of Notch distribution along the pIIa-pIIb interface (Figure 3B).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Numb regulates the recycling of Notch-Sanpodo in the pIIb cell. (A) During SOP division, Numb (green) localizes at the anterior cortex and promotes the asymmetric distribution of a-Adaptin (α-Ada, orange), one of the subunits of the AP-2 complex, regulating Clathrin-mediated endocytosis. (B) During cytokinesis, Numb is unequally partitioned in the pIIb cell, where it is relocated from the cortex towards apical endosomes in an a-Ada-dependent manner. There, Numb prevents the recycling of Notch-Spdo (blue/purple) to the plasma membrane in favor of late endosomal transport. In contrast, in the pIIa cell, in the absence of Numb, Notch-Spdo can be recycled to the plasma membrane. According to this model, where Numb negatively regulates the recycling of Notch-Spdo, Numb, by reducing the level of Notch present at the plasma membrane of the pIIb cell, generates the asymmetrical low Notch/high Notch levels in pIIb and pIIa cells, respectively.</figcaption></figure>
Since Numb does not regulate Spdo-Notch endocytosis, the requirement of Numb-AP2 interaction for Notch inhibition raises the question of the function of Numb-AP2 binding. The fact that Numb relocation to apical sorting endosomes is compromised upon loss of Numb suggests that AP-2 promotes the redistribution of Numb from the basal cortex to apical endosomes [19]. Furthermore, it cannot be ruled out that Numb-mediated AP-2 asymmetry generates an asymmetry in endocytosis capacity in the pIIB cell that is necessary for the endocytosis of components of the Notch pathway other than Spdo-Notch, and necessary for the acquisition of binary identities.

### 5.3. Mechanisms of Action of Neuralized in the pIIB Cell

Neur was the second cell fate determinant identified in the SOP that, similarly to Numb, localizes at the antero-basal cortex of the cell in mitosis, and partitions unequally in the pIIB cell at cytokinesis [92]. In pIIB cell, Neur ubiquitinates the Notch ligand Delta to trigger its endocytosis and promotes Notch activation in the pIIa cell [14–16,92,93]. Neur-mediated endocytosis of Delta is proposed to lead to the activation of Notch in trans in the pIIa cell. This is because Notch activation relies on mechano-transduction [39,94]. Indeed, Notch requires a conformational change in the negative regulatory region of its extracellular domain (NRR domain), which masks the S2 cleavage site [95,96]. Experiments performed ex vivo in vertebrate cells revealed that a conformational change in the Notch NRR domain can be mechanically induced by pulling forces in the range of 4–9 pN [97–100]. In the quest of identifying the force-generator-mediating receptor activation, Epsin- and Clathrin-dependent endocytosis of the Notch ligand Delta was shown to generate pulling forces sufficient enough to activate Notch [101,102]. However, Epsin, which is generally required for ligand endocytosis and Notch activation in flies, is dispensable for SOP intra-lineage decisions [103]. Instead of Epsin, WASp and Arp2/3, known to increase endocytosis efficiency through the nucleation of branched actin [104,105], are specifically required for binary fate decision in the SOP lineage [106,107]. Careful analyses by time lapse revealed that in the pIIB cell, WASp, by activating Arp2/3, is required for Delta endocytosis at the time of Notch activation during cytokinesis [74]. The current model is that during cytokinesis, unequally inherited Neuralized ubiquitinates Delta in the pIIB cell, serving as a signal to trigger Delta endocytosis. Upon endocytic vesicle formation, WASp-Arp2/3 would provide an extra pushing force required for efficient endocytosis of the Delta bound to the Notch receptor in trans in the pIIa cell, in turn inducing the potent pulling forces on the Notch receptor present in the pIIa cell, hence Notch activation (Figure 4). The requirement for WASp-Arp2/3 activity instead of Epsin would be that intra-lineage decisions take place during cytokinesis at a time when Epsin activity could be negatively regulated by phosphorylation [74,108] and membrane rigidity would be higher, requiring more forces to deform it. Along this line, plasma membrane stiffness in the pIIa cell, the Notch-receiving cell in cytokinesis, may also play a role in signaling efficiency as cells with a rigid membrane are expected to experience more pulling forces from ligand endocytosis in the sending cell [109].

Although the role of Neur and endocytosis in binary fate decisions is now established, there are still some open questions: (i) While Neur behaves as a cell determinant, whether its asymmetric localization is strictly required for pIIa-pIIB fate acquisition remains to be determined. First, the *neur* mutant phenotype is rescued by expressing Mindbomb1, an ubiquitin ligase required for Notch activation outside of intra-lineage decisions, which is not asymmetrically localized [110]. Second, in *numb* mutant cells, while Neur is unequally inherited by the anterior cell, Delta from the posterior cell is able to activate Notch in the anterior cell that adopts the pIIa-like fate [92]. (ii) It has recently been proposed that Neur and Delta form a signaling complex in which Neur ubiquitinylates components other than Delta to enhance the signaling [111]. (iii) Neur exerts a Notch-independent function, via Stardust-dependent endocytosis of Crumbs, to regulate the apical surface of epithelial cells during epithelial morphogenesis [112–114]. It remains to be determined whether Neur activity is responsible for the localization of Crumbs in the apical endosomes of SOP
daughter cells [55] and if this has an impact on the apico-basal polarity of the SOP and
on the signaling at pIIa-pIIb interface, hence linking cell polarity remodeling and Notch
signaling in this context.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Figure 4.** Neur regulates Delta endocytosis in the pIIB cell to trigger mechanosensitive activation of Notch in the pIIa cell. Activation of Notch (blue in the pIIa cell) is a multi-step process. It requires first the binding of the ligand Delta (red in pIIB) in trans (1). Then, Neur (green) ubiquitinates Delta (post-translational modification of the cytoplasmic domain of Delta depicted in yellow) (2). The ubiquitin moiety serves as a signal triggering Delta internalization (3). Arp2/3- and WASp-dependent polymerization of branched actin promotes extra pushing forces on the forming endocytic vesicle (4). Delta is bound to Notch, and Delta endocytosis exerts pulling forces on Notch, (5) thereby causing a conformational change in the Notch extracellular domain which reveals the S2 cleavage site for ADAM secretase. The second proteolytic cleavage triggered by g-secretase (cleavage S3) occurs, releasing into the cytoplasm of the pIIa cell the Notch intracellular domain, which can then be translocated into the nucleus.
5.4. *Additional Contribution of Membrane Traffic in Binary Cell Fate Acquisition*

Over the last two decades, several events and/or regulators of membrane trafficking
acting in addition to Numb and Neur have been identified and are likely to contribute to
ensuring robustness and directionality in intra-lineage decision making.

As stressed in the previous paragraph, endocytosis plays an essential role in binary
cell fate decision. Studies from the Gonzalez-Gaitan laboratory identified a population of
Delta and Notch that are internalized in the SOP prior to mitosis, targeted to endosomes
marked by the protein Sara (Smad anchor for receptor activation) [115]. During early
cytokinesis, the Sara-positive endosomes (Sara endosomes) are transported to the central
spindle thanks to the microtubule motor Klp98A. As the central spindle is made up of
antiparallel microtubules, Sara endosomes are transported bidirectionally, until Klp10-
and Patronin-mediated symmetry breaking of the central spindle takes place, leading
to the unequal inheritance of Sara endosomes by the pIIa cell [116]. Notch itself, by
binding to Uninflatable, a transmembrane protein containing EGF repeats, was shown
to regulate the targeting to Sara endosomes and their asymmetric partitioning [117]. In
Sara endosomes inherited by the pIIa cell, Notch was reported to undergo g-secretase
cleavage [115]. Collectively, these data led to a model in which unequal segregation of
Sara endosomes increases Notch signaling in the pIIa cell while decreasing it in the pIIB
cell [115,116]. Although the characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying the
asymmetric segregation of Sara endosomes containing Delta and Notch is remarkable,
their precise contribution to Notch activation remains debated [9,118]. This is because
preventing the asymmetric distribution of Sara endosomes does not lead to a defect in
Notch activation in the SOP lineage, excepted in the case where a dominant negative
version of Rab5 is over-expressed [115], or in the case of depletion of Neuralized [116].
However, these situations do not allow the effect of the loss of Sara endosome asymmetry
to be disentangled from the effect of Rab5 on the endocytosis required for the activities of
Numb and Neuralized on the one hand, and the role of Neuralized as a cell fate determinant
in regulating Delta endocytosis during cytokinesis on the other. Finally, the loss of function
of Uninflatable, which causes a penetrant defect in the distribution of Sara endosomes,
does not lead to a defect in pIIa/pIIB decision, but only to a weakly penetrant defect in
the pIIa and pIIB daughter cell lineages [115]. At last, the tracking of functional GFP and a
mCherry-tagged version of Notch revealed that the bulk of Notch-containing endosomes
are equally partitioned at SOP cytokinesis [118]. Although this study does exclude the
possibility that a subset of specialized endosomes containing Notch traffic directionally into
pIIa at cytokinesis, collectively these data indicate that further, more discriminating studies
should be set up to firmly establish their role in the directionality of Notch signaling.

Among the additional membrane traffic regulators are the Rab11 recycling endosomes, whose distribution differs between SOP daughters [119]. Indeed, Rab11 recycling endosomes in which Delta is trafficked are grouped together at the centrosome in the anterior pIIB cell, leading to the notion that Delta is recycled more efficiently and rapidly in pIIB, thereby increasing Delta signaling in the pIIB cell [119]. This notion was supported by the discovery that Sec15, a Rab11-interacting subunit of the exocyst complex and Epsin15 homology domain-containing protein-binding protein 1 (dEHBP1), regulates Delta recycling and is required for Notch activation in the pIIa cell [120,121]. However, it remains to be determined whether this recycling of Delta is required for Notch activation. Why would recycling be necessary? It is interesting to note that Delta-GFP is barely detected at the plasma membrane unless its endocytosis is prevented, suggesting that its time residence at the plasma membrane is short [73]. Thus, Rab11-Sec15-dependent recycling might be a means to constantly supply enough Delta to the signaling pIIa-pIIB interface. An alternative would be that the recycling enables the targeting of Delta to the proper plasma membrane domain. The Arp2/3 and WASp complex, in addition to being required for boosting Delta endocytosis at cytokinesis [74], is required for the formation of a specific actin-rich apical structure at the SOP daughter interface and for the trafficking of Delta into this structure [107]. Because the photo-tracking of a fluorescently tagged Notch receptor
shows that Notch activation takes place primarily at the lateral membrane, Rab11-Sec15-dependent recycling of Delta may serve to relocate Delta from its apical delivery site to the lateral plasma membrane. Further work would help in deciding between these possibilities. In addition, since Sec15, Rab11 and Arp2/3-WASp also regulate the trafficking of other transmembrane proteins that impact cellular mechanics and polarity [122–124], it may be possible to envisage that other targets than Delta contribute to Notch-dependent binary fate acquisition.

**6. Actual Limitations and Concluding Remarks**

The genetic and live-imaging dissection of the seemingly simple SOP lineage has allowed the decryption of the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of fate asymmetry following asymmetric division. The development of microscopes with more sensitive detectors and improved axial resolution, enabling better spatio-temporal photo manipulation and photo-tracking, will certainly help better monitoring Notch receptor trafficking, proteolytic activation and translocation in the nuclei in the 3D context of epithelial cells. Approaches such as retention using selective hooks (RUSH) [125] would enable a real-time visualization of the exocytosis of ligands and receptors to pinpoint where they are addressed in polarized cells. The spatio-temporal control of the activity of Notch regulators, thanks to the use of thermosensitive mutants, knockout-side or optogenetic, would be informative to decipher the time and location of Notch activation (prior, during of following SOP division).

As stressed in this review, some questions are still open or debated. Among them is the role of epithelial junctional remodeling in asymmetric division, which has begun to emerge. The mechanism by which NICD is translocated in the nuclei following proteolytic activation at the plasma membrane is also an important question. Notch activation is initiated in the pIIa cell at a time where the two daughter cells are still connected by the midbody through which fluorescent probes of similar size to NICD are equilibrated between pIIa and pIIb within a few minutes [126]. How is directionality to restrict nuclear import to the pIIa cell achieved? Based on the fact that SOP division is a semi-closed mitosis (C. Rouinet and RLB, unpublished observations) and that importins regulate Notch signaling [127,128], it will be interesting to test if an asymmetry in nuclear envelope and/or nuclear pore reformation between pIIa and pIIb could also contribute to binary fate acquisition.

Finally, as vertebrate Notch is involved in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and differentiation [2], in solid tumors [3], it can be anticipated that the findings obtained in the *Drosophila* SOP model system will continue to be useful to decipher the molecular and cellular basis of the activation of this fundamental paracrine communication pathway, and ultimately propose ways to modulate it for curative purposes.

**Funding:** This research was funded in part by a research grant from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) programme PRC Vie, santé et bien être ACTriCE (ANR-20-CE13-0015), and Fondation ARC (PJA 20191209388).

**Acknowledgments:** We thank Chantal Rouinet and Jacek Kubiak for their critical reading of the manuscript.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

**References**

1. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.; Muskavitch, M.A. Notch: The past, the present, and the future. *Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.* **2010**, *92*, 1–29.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Liu, J.; Sato, C.; Cerletti, M.; Wagers, A. Notch signaling in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. *Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.* **2010**, *92*, 367–409.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Koch, U.; Radtke, F. Notch signaling in solid tumors. *Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.* **2010**, *92*, 411–455.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Masek, J.; Andersson, E.R. The developmental biology of genetic Notch disorders. *Development* **2017**, *144*, 1743–1763.
[CrossRef]

5. Zhou, B.; Lin, W.; Long, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wu, K.; Chu, Q. Notch signaling pathway: Architecture, disease, and therapeutics. *Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.* **2022**, *7*, 95.
[CrossRef]

6. Kopan, R. Notch signaling. *Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.* **2012**, *4*, a011213.
[CrossRef]
7. Gho, M.; Bellaiche, Y.; Schweisguth, F. Revisiting the Drosophila microchaete lineage: A novel intrinsically asymmetric cell division generates a glial cell. *Development* **1999**, *126*, 3573–3584. [CrossRef]

8. Hartenstein, V.; Posakony, J.W. Development of adult sensilla on the wing and notum of Drosophila melanogaster. *Development* **1989**, *107*, 389–405. [CrossRef]

9. Schweisguth, F. Asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila bristle lineage: From the polarization of sensory organ precursor cells to Notch-mediated binary fate decision. *Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol.* **2015**, *4*, 299–309. [CrossRef]

10. Simpson, P. Lateral inhibition and the development of the sensory bristles of the adult peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. *Development* **1990**, *109*, 509–519. [CrossRef]

11. Gho, M.; Schweisguth, F. Frizzled signalling controls orientation of asymmetric sense organ precursor cell divisions in Drosophila. *Nature* **1998**, *393*, 178–181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Rhyu, M.S.; Jan, L.Y.; Jan, Y.N. Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells. *Cell* **1994**, *76*, 477–491. [CrossRef]

13. Le Borgne, R.; Schweisguth, F. Notch signaling: Endocytosis makes delta signal better. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2003**, *13*, R273–R275. [CrossRef]

14. Deblandre, G.A.; Lai, E.C.; Kintner, C. Xenopus neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that interacts with XDelta1 and regulates Notch signaling. *Dev. Cell* **2001**, *1*, 795–806. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Lai, E.C.; Deblandre, G.A.; Kintner, C.; Rubin, G.M. Drosophila neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that promotes the internalization and degradation of delta. *Dev. Cell* **2001**, *1*, 783–794. [CrossRef]

16. Pavlopoulos, E.; Pitsouli, C.; Klueg, K.M.; Muskavitch, M.A.; Moschonas, N.K.; Delidakis, C. neuralized Encodes a peripheral membrane protein involved in delta signaling and endocytosis. *Dev. Cell* **2001**, *1*, 807–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17. Frise, E.; Knoblich, J.A.; Younger-Shepherd, S.; Jan, L.Y.; Jan, Y.N. The Drosophila Numb protein inhibits signaling of the Notch receptor during cell-cell interaction in sensory organ lineage. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1996**, *93*, 11925–11932. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18. Cotton, M.; Benhra, N.; Le Borgne, R. Numb inhibits the recycling of Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory organ precursor. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2013**, *23*, 581–587. [CrossRef]

19. Couturier, L.; Mazouni, K.; Schweisguth, F. Numb localizes at endosomes and controls the endosomal sorting of notch after asymmetric division in Drosophila. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2013**, *23*, 588–593. [CrossRef]

20. Inaba, M.; Yamashita, Y.M. Asymmetric stem cell division: Precision for robustness. *Cell Stem Cell* **2012**, *11*, 461–469. [CrossRef]

21. Tajbakhsh, S.; Rocheteau, P.; Le Roux, I. Asymmetric cell divisions and asymmetric cell fates. *Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.* **2009**, *25*, 671–699. [CrossRef]

22. Gozlan, O.; Sprinzak, D. Notch signaling in development and homeostasis. *Development* **2023**, *150*, 201138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Poulson, D.F. Chromosomal Deficiencies and the Embryonic Development of Drosophila Melanogaster. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1937**, *23*, 133–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Mohr, O.L. Character Changes Caused by Mutation of an Entire Region of a Chromosome in Drosophila. *Genetics* **1919**, *4*, 275–282. [CrossRef]

25. Lehmann, R.; Jimenez, F.; Dietrich, U.; Campos-Ortega, J.A. On the phenotype and development of mutants of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. *Wilem Roux Arch. Dev. Biol.* **1983**, *192*, 62–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26. Nusslein-Volhard, C.; Wieschaus, E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. *Nature* **1980**, *287*, 795–801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Nusslein-Volhard, C.; Wieschaus, E.; Kluding, H. Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster: I. Zygotic loci on the second chromosome. *Wilem Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol.* **1984**, *193*, 267–282. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.; Muskavitch, M.A.; Yedvobnick, B. Molecular cloning of Notch, a locus affecting neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1983**, *80*, 1977–1981. [CrossRef]

29. Kidd, S.; Lockett, T.J.; Young, M.W. The Notch locus of Drosophila melanogaster. *Cell* **1983**, *34*, 421–433. [CrossRef]

30. Kidd, S.; Kelley, M.R.; Young, M.W. Sequence of the notch locus of Drosophila melanogaster: Relationship of the encoded protein to mammalian clotting and growth factors. *Mol. Cell. Biol.* **1986**, *6*, 3094–3108. [CrossRef]

31. Greenwald, I.; Coulson, A.; Sulston, J.; Priess, J. Correlation of the physical and genetic maps in the lin-12 region of Caenorhabditis elegans. *Nucleic Acids Res.* **1987**, *15*, 2295–2307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

32. Yochem, J.; Weston, K.; Greenwald, I. The Caenorhabditis elegans lin-12 gene encodes a transmembrane protein with overall similarity to Drosophila Notch. *Nature* **1988**, *335*, 547–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Austin, J.; Kimble, J. glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in *C. elegans*. *Cell* **1987**, *51*, 589–599. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Austin, J.; Kimble, J. Transcript analysis of glp-1 and lin-12, homologous genes required for cell interactions during development of *C. elegans*. *Cell* **1989**, *58*, 565–571. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Greenwald, I.S.; Sternberg, P.W.; Horvitz, H.R. The lin-12 locus specifies cell fates in *Caenorhabditis elegans*. *Cell* **1983**, *34*, 435–444. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36. Coffman, C.; Harris, W.; Kintner, C. Xotch, the Xenopus homolog of Drosophila notch. *Science* **1990**, *249*, 1438–1441. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Stubbs, J.D.; Lekutis, C.; Singer, K.L.; Bui, A.; Yuzuki, D.; Srinivasan, U.; Parry, G. cDNA cloning of a mouse mammary epithelial cell surface protein reveals the existence of epidermal growth factor-like domains linked to factor VIII-like sequences. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1990**, *87*, 8417–8421. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

38. Fortini, M.E. Notch and presenilin: A proteolytic mechanism emerges. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **2001**, *13*, 627–634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

39. Kopan, R.; Ilagan, M.X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: Unfolding the activation mechanism. *Cell* **2009**, *137*, 216–233. [CrossRef]

40. Kopan, R.; Schroeter, E.H.; Weintraub, H.; Nye, J.S. Signal transduction by activated mNotch: Importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1996**, *93*, 1683–1688. [CrossRef]

41. Kidd, S.; Lieber, T. Furin cleavage is not a requirement for Drosophila Notch function. *Mech. Dev.* **2002**, *115*, 41–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

42. Lieber, T.; Kidd, S.; Young, M.W. kuzbanian-mediated cleavage of Drosophila Notch. *Genes Dev.* **2002**, *16*, 209–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Brou, C.; Logeat, F.; Gupta, N.; Bessia, C.; LeBail, O.; Doedens, J.R.; Cumano, A.; Roux, P.; Black, R.A.; Israel, A. A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: The role of the disintegrin-metalloprotease TACE. *Mol. Cell* **2000**, *5*, 207–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. De Strooper, B.; Annaert, W.; Cupers, P.; Saftig, P.; Craessaerts, K.; Mumm, J.S.; Schroeter, E.H.; Schrijvers, V.; Wolfe, M.S.; Ray, W.J.; et al. A presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. *Nature* **1999**, *398*, 518–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

45. Struhl, G.; Greenwald, I. Presenilin is required for activity and nuclear access of Notch in Drosophila. *Nature* **1999**, *398*, 522–525. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

46. Ray, W.J.; Yao, M.; Mumm, J.; Schroeter, E.H.; Saftig, P.; Wolfe, M.; Selkoe, D.J.; Kopan, R.; Goate, A.M. Cell surface presenilin-1 participates in the gamma-secretase-like proteolysis of Notch. *J. Biol. Chem.* **1999**, *274*, 36801–36807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

47. Jarriault, S.; Brou, C.; Logeat, F.; Schroeter, E.H.; Kopan, R.; Israel, A. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. *Nature* **1995**, *377*, 355–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

48. Bray, S.; Bernard, F. Notch targets and their regulation. *Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.* **2010**, *92*, 253–275. [CrossRef]

49. Cowan, C.R.; Hyman, A.A. Asymmetric cell division in C. elegans: Cortical polarity and spindle positioning. *Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.* **2004**, *20*, 427–453. [CrossRef]

50. Knoblich, J.A. Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. *Cell* **2008**, *132*, 583–597. [CrossRef]

51. Motegi, F.; Seydoux, G. The PAR network: Redundancy and robustness in a symmetry-breaking system. *Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.* **2013**, *368*, 20130010. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

52. Gonczy, P. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: Flies and worms pave the way. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* **2008**, *9*, 355–366. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

53. Founounou, N.; Loyer, N.; Le Borgne, R. Septins regulate the contractility of the actomyosin ring to enable adherens junction remodeling during cytokinesis of epithelial cells. *Dev. Cell* **2013**, *24*, 242–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54. Bellaiche, Y.; Radovic, A.; Woods, D.F.; Hough, C.D.; Parmentier, M.L.; O’Kane, C.J.; Bryant, P.J.; Schweisguth, F. The Partner of Inscuteable/Discs-large complex is required to establish planar polarity during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. *Cell* **2001**, *106*, 355–366. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

55. Houssin, E.; Pinot, M.; Bellec, K.; Le Borgne, R. Par3 cooperates with Sanpodo for the assembly of Notch clusters following asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells. *eLife* **2021**, *10*, 66659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56. Bellaiche, Y.; Gho, M.; Kaltschmidt, J.A.; Brand, A.H.; Schweisguth, F. Frizzled regulates localization of cell-fate determinants and mitotic spindle rotation during asymmetric cell division. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2001**, *3*, 50–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

57. Bilder, D.; Li, M.; Perrimon, N. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. *Science* **2000**, *289*, 113–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

58. Bilder, D.; Perrimon, N. Localization of apical epithelial determinants by the basolateral PDZ protein Scribble. *Nature* **2000**, *403*, 676–680. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

59. Wirtz-Peitz, F.; Nishimura, T.; Knoblich, J.A. Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. *Cell* **2008**, *135*, 161–173. [CrossRef]

60. Besson, C.; Bernard, F.; Corson, F.; Rouault, H.; Reynaud, E.; Keder, A.; Mazouni, K.; Schweisguth, F. Planar Cell Polarity Breaks the Symmetry of PAR Protein Distribution prior to Mitosis in Drosophila Sensory Organ Precursor Cells. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2015**, *25*, 1104–1110. [CrossRef]

61. Smith, C.A.; Lau, K.M.; Rahmani, Z.; Dho, S.E.; Brothers, G.; She, Y.M.; Berry, D.M.; Bonneil, E.; Thibault, P.; Schweisguth, F.; et al. aPKC-mediated phosphorylation regulates asymmetric membrane localization of the cell fate determinant Numb. *EMBO J.* **2007**, *26*, 468–480. [CrossRef]

62. Langevin, J.; Le Borgne, R.; Rosenfeld, F.; Gho, M.; Schweisguth, F.; Bellaiche, Y. Lethal giant larvae controls the localization of notch-signaling regulators numb, neuralized, and Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory-organ precursor cells. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2005**, *15*, 955–962. [CrossRef]

63. Gomes, J.E.; Corado, M.; Schweisguth, F. Van Gogh and Frizzled act redundantly in the Drosophila sensory organ precursor cell to orient its asymmetric division. *PLoS ONE* **2009**, *4*, e4485. [CrossRef]
64. Bowman, S.K.; Neumuller, R.A.; Novatchkova, M.; Du, Q.; Knoblich, J.A. The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. *Dev. Cell* **2006**, *10*, 731–742. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

65. Segalen, M.; Johnston, C.A.; Martin, C.A.; Dumortier, J.G.; Prehoda, K.E.; David, N.B.; Doe, C.Q.; Bellaiche, Y. The Fz-Dsh planar cell polarity pathway induces oriented cell division via Mud/NuMA in Drosophila and zebrafish. *Dev. Cell* **2010**, *19*, 740–752. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Hao, Y.; Du, Q.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Z.; Balsbaugh, J.L.; Maitra, S.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hunt, D.F.; Macara, I.G. Par3 controls epithelial spindle orientation by aPKC-mediated phosphorylation of apical Pins. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2010**, *20*, 1809–1818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

67. Guilgur, L.G.; Prudencio, P.; Ferreira, T.; Pimenta-Marques, A.R.; Martinho, R.G. Drosophila aPKC is required for mitotic spindle orientation during symmetric division of epithelial cells. *Development* **2012**, *139*, 503–513. [CrossRef]

68. Johnston, C.A.; Hirono, K.; Prehoda, K.E.; Doe, C.Q. Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/Dlg spindle orientation pathway using induced cell polarity in S2 cells. *Cell* **2009**, *138*, 1150–1163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

69. Johnston, C.A.; Manning, L.; Lu, M.S.; Golub, O.; Doe, C.Q.; Prehoda, K.E. Formin-mediated actin polymerization cooperates with Mushroom body defect (Mud)-Dynein during Frizzled-Dishevelled spindle orientation. *J. Cell Sci.* **2013**, *126*, 4436–4444. [CrossRef]

70. Darnat, P.; Burg, A.; Salle, J.; Lacoste, J.; Louvet-Vallee, S.; Gho, M.; Audibert, A. Cortical Cyclin A controls spindle orientation during asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. *Nat. Commun.* **2022**, *13*, 2723. [CrossRef]

71. Daeden, A.; Mietke, A.; Derivery, E.; Seum, C.; Julicher, F.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Polarized branched Actin modulates cortical mechanics to produce unequal-size daughters during asymmetric division. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2023**, *25*, 235–245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

72. Couturier, L.; Vodovar, N.; Schweisguth, F. Endocytosis by Numb breaks Notch symmetry at cytokinesis. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2012**, *14*, 131–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

73. Trylinski, M.; Mazouni, K.; Schweisguth, F. Intra-lineage Fate Decisions Involve Activation of Notch Receptors Basal to the Midbody in Drosophila Sensory Organ Precursor Cells. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2017**, *27*, 2239–2247.e3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

74. Trylinski, M.; Schweisguth, F. Activation of Arp2/3 by WASp Is Essential for the Endocytosis of Delta Only during Cytokinesis in Drosophila. *Cell Rep.* **2019**, *28*, 1–10.e3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

75. Benhra, N.; Lallet, L.; Cotton, M.; Le Bras, S.; Dussert, A.; Le Borgne, R. AP-1 controls the trafficking of Notch and Sanpodo toward E-Cadherin junctions in sensory organ precursors. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2011**, *21*, 87–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

76. Bellec, K.; Gicquel, I.; Le Borgne, R. Stratum recruits Rab8 at Golgi exit sites to regulate the basolateral sorting of Notch and Sanpodo. *Development* **2018**, *145*, dev163469. [CrossRef]

77. Bellec, K.; Pinot, M.; Gicquel, I.; Le Borgne, R. The Clathrin adaptor AP-1 and Stratum act in parallel pathways to control Notch activation in Drosophila sensory organ precursors cells. *Development* **2021**, *148*, dev191437. [CrossRef]

78. Daniel, E.; Daude, M.; Kolotuev, I.; Charish, K.; Auld, V.; Le Borgne, R. Coordination of Septate Junctions Assembly and Completion of Cytokinesis in Proliferative Epithelial Tissues. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2018**, *28*, 1380–1391.e4. [CrossRef]

79. Herszterg, S.; Leibfried, A.; Bosveld, F.; Martin, C.; Bellaiche, Y. Interplay between the dividing cell and its neighbors regulates adherens junction formation during cytokinesis in epithelial tissue. *Dev. Cell* **2013**, *24*, 256–270. [CrossRef]

80. Johnson, S.A.; Zitserman, D.; Roegiers, F. Numb regulates the balance between Notch recycling and late-endosome targeting in Drosophila neural progenitor cells. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **2016**, *27*, 2857–2866. [CrossRef]

81. Smith, C.A.; Dho, S.E.; Donaldson, J.; Tepass, U.; McGlade, C.J. The cell fate determinant numb interacts with EHD/Rme-1 family proteins and has a role in endocytic recycling. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **2004**, *15*, 3698–3708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

82. Santolini, E.; Puri, C.; Salcini, A.E.; Gagliani, M.C.; Pelicci, P.G.; Tacchetti, C.; Di Fiore, P.P. Numb is an endocytic protein. *J. Cell Biol.* **2000**, *151*, 1345–1352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

83. Berdnik, D.; Torok, T.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M.; Knoblich, J.A. The endocytic protein alpha-Adaptin is required for numb-mediated asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. *Dev. Cell* **2002**, *3*, 221–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

84. Guo, M.; Jan, L.Y.; Jan, Y.N. Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: Interaction of Numb and Notch. *Neuron* **1996**, *17*, 27–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

85. O'Connor-Giles, K.M.; Skeath, J.B. Numb inhibits membrane localization of Sanpodo, a four-pass transmembrane protein, to promote asymmetric divisions in Drosophila. *Dev. Cell* **2003**, *5*, 231–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

86. Babaoglan, A.B.; O'Connor-Giles, K.M.; Mistry, H.; Schickedanz, A.; Wilson, B.A.; Skeath, J.B. Sanpodo: A context-dependent activator and inhibitor of Notch signaling during asymmetric divisions. *Development* **2009**, *136*, 4089–4098. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

87. Upadhyay, A.; Kandachar, V.; Zitserman, D.; Tong, X.; Roegiers, F. Sanpodo controls sensory organ precursor fate by directing Notch trafficking and binding gamma-secretase. *J. Cell Biol.* **2013**, *201*, 439–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

88. Tong, X.; Zitserman, D.; Serebruiskii, I.; Andrake, M.; Dunbrack, R.; Roegiers, F. Numb independently antagonizes Sanpodo membrane targeting and Notch signaling in Drosophila sensory organ precursor cells. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **2010**, *21*, 802–810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

89. Hutterer, A.; Knoblich, J.A. Numb and alpha-Adaptin regulate Sanpodo endocytosis to specify cell fate in Drosophila external sensory organs. *EMBO Rep.* **2005**, *6*, 836–842. [CrossRef]

90. Krieger, J.R.; Taylor, P.; Gajadhar, A.S.; Guha, A.; Moran, M.F.; McGlade, C.J. Identification and selected reaction monitoring (SRM) quantification of endocytosis factors associated with Numb. *Mol. Cell. Proteom.* **2013**, *12*, 499–514. [CrossRef]

91. Nilsson, L.; Conradt, B.; Ruaud, A.F.; Chen, C.C.; Hatzold, J.; Bessereau, J.L.; Grant, B.D.; Tuck, S. Caenorhabditis elegans num-1 negatively regulates endocytic recycling. *Genetics* **2008**, *179*, 375–387. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
92. Le Borgne, R.; Schweisguth, F. Unequal segregation of Neuralized biases Notch activation during asymmetric cell division. *Dev. Cell* **2003**, *5*, 139–148. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

93. Daskalaki, A.; Shalaby, N.A.; Kux, K.; Tsoumpekos, G.; Tsibidis, G.D.; Muskavitch, M.A.; Delidakis, C. Distinct intracellular motifs of Delta mediate its ubiquitylation and activation by Mindbomb1 and Neuralized. *J. Cell Biol.* **2011**, *195*, 1017–1031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

94. Suarez Rodriguez, F.; Sanlidag, S.; Sahlgren, C. Mechanical regulation of the Notch signaling pathway. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **2023**, *85*, 102244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

95. Gordon, W.R.; Vardar-Ulu, D.; Histen, G.; Sanchez-Irizarry, C.; Aster, J.C.; Blacklow, S.C. Structural basis for autoinhibition of Notch. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* **2007**, *14*, 295–300. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

96. Tiyanont, K.; Wales, T.E.; Aste-Amezaga, M.; Aster, J.C.; Engen, J.R.; Blacklow, S.C. Evidence for increased exposure of the Notch1 metalloprotease cleavage site upon conversion to an activated conformation. *Structure* **2011**, *19*, 546–554. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

97. Shergill, B.; Meloty-Kapella, L.; Musse, A.A.; Weinmaster, G.; Botvinick, E. Optical tweezers studies on Notch: Single-molecule interaction strength is independent of ligand endocytosis. *Dev. Cell* **2012**, *22*, 1313–1320. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

98. Chowdhury, F.; Li, I.T.; Ngo, T.T.; Leslie, B.J.; Kim, B.C.; Sokoloski, J.E.; Weiland, E.; Wang, X.; Chemla, Y.R.; Lohman, T.M.; et al. Defining Single Molecular Forces Required for Notch Activation Using Nano Yoyo. *Nano Lett.* **2016**, *16*, 3892–3897. [CrossRef]

99. Gordon, W.R.; Zimmerman, B.; He, L.; Miles, L.J.; Huang, J.; Tiyanont, K.; McArthur, D.G.; Aster, J.C.; Perrimon, N.; Loparo, J.J.; et al. Mechanical Allostery: Evidence for a Force Requirement in the Proteolytic Activation of Notch. *Dev. Cell* **2015**, *33*, 729–736. [CrossRef]

100. Seo, D.; Southard, K.M.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, H.J.; Farlow, J.; Lee, J.U.; Litt, D.B.; Haas, T.; Alivisatos, A.P.; Cheon, J.; et al. A Mechanogenetic Toolkit for Interrogating Cell Signaling in Space and Time. *Cell* **2016**, *165*, 1507–1518. [CrossRef]

101. Meloty-Kapella, L.; Shergill, B.; Kuon, J.; Botvinick, E.; Weinmaster, G. Notch ligand endocytosis generates mechanical pulling force dependent on dynamin, epsins, and actin. *Dev. Cell* **2012**, *22*, 1299–1312. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

102. Langridge, P.D.; Struhl, G. Epsin-Dependent Ligand Endocytosis Activates Notch by Force. *Cell* **2017**, *171*, 1383–1396.e12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

103. Wang, W.; Struhl, G. Drosophila Epsin mediates a select endocytic pathway that DSL ligands must enter to activate Notch. *Development* **2004**, *131*, 5367–5380. [CrossRef]

104. Kaksonen, M.; Roux, A. Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* **2018**, *19*, 313–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

105. Mund, M.; van der Beek, J.A.; Deschamps, J.; Dmitrieff, S.; Hoess, P.; Monster, J.L.; Picco, A.; Nedelec, F.; Kaksonen, M.; Ries, J. Systematic Nanoscale Analysis of Endocytosis Links Efficient Vesicle Formation to Patterned Actin Nucleation. *Cell* **2018**, *174*, 884–896. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

106. Ben-Yaacov, S.; Le Borgne, R.; Abramson, I.; Schweisguth, F.; Schejter, E.D. Wasp, the Drosophila Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome gene homologue, is required for cell fate decisions mediated by Notch signaling. *J. Cell Biol.* **2001**, *152*, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

107. Rajan, A.; Tien, A.C.; Haueter, C.M.; Schulze, K.L.; Bellen, H.J. The Arp2/3 complex and WASp are required for apical trafficking of Delta into microvilli during cell fate specification of sensory organ precursors. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2009**, *11*, 815–824. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

108. Chen, H.; Slepnev, V.I.; Di Fiore, P.P.; De Camilli, P. The interaction of epsin and Eps15 with the clathrin adaptor AP-2 is inhibited by mitotic phosphorylation and enhanced by stimulation-dependent dephosphorylation in nerve terminals. *J. Biol. Chem.* **1999**, *274*, 3257–3260. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

109. Kovall, R.A.; Gebelein, B.; Sprinzak, D.; Kopan, R. The Canonical Notch Signaling Pathway: Structural and Biochemical Insights into Shape, Sugar, and Force. *Dev. Cell* **2017**, *41*, 228–241. [CrossRef]

110. Lai, E.C.; Roegiers, F.; Qin, X.; Jan, Y.N.; Rubin, G.M. The ubiquitin ligase Drosophila Mind bomb promotes Notch signaling by regulating the localization and activity of Serrate and Delta. *Development* **2005**, *132*, 2319–2332. [CrossRef]

111. Kalodimou, K.; Stapountzi, M.; Vullings, N.; Seib, E.; Klein, T.; Delidakis, C. Separable Roles for Neur and Ubiquitin in Delta Signalling in the Drosophila CNS Lineages. *Cells* **2023**, *12*, 2833. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

112. Chanet, S.; Schweisguth, F. Regulation of epithelial polarity by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Neuralized and the Bearded inhibitors in Drosophila. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **2012**, *14*, 467–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

113. Perez-Mockus, G.; Roca, V.; Mazouni, K.; Schweisguth, F. Neuralized regulates Crumbs endocytosis and epithelium morphogenesis via specific Stardust isoforms. *J. Cell Biol.* **2017**, *216*, 1405–1420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

114. Perez-Mockus, G.; Mazouni, K.; Roca, V.; Corradi, G.; Conte, V.; Schweisguth, F. Spatial regulation of contractility by Neuralized and Bearded during furrow invagination in Drosophila. *Nat. Commun.* **2017**, *8*, 1594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

115. Coumailleau, F.; Furthauer, M.; Knoblich, J.A.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Directional Delta and Notch trafficking in Sara endosomes during asymmetric cell division. *Nature* **2009**, *458*, 1051–1055. [CrossRef]

116. Derivery, E.; Seum, C.; Daeden, A.; Loubery, S.; Holtzer, L.; Julicher, F.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Polarized endosome dynamics by spindle asymmetry during asymmetric cell division. *Nature* **2015**, *528*, 280–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

117. Loubery, S.; Seum, C.; Moraleda, A.; Daeden, A.; Furthauer, M.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Uninflatable and Notch control the targeting of Sara endosomes during asymmetric division. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2014**, *24*, 2142–2148. [CrossRef]

118. Couturier, L.; Trylinski, M.; Mazouni, K.; Darnet, L.; Schweisguth, F. A fluorescent tagging approach in Drosophila reveals late endosomal trafficking of Notch and Sanpodo. *J. Cell Biol.* **2014**, *207*, 351–363. [CrossRef]
119. Emery, G.; Hutterer, A.; Berdnik, D.; Mayer, B.; Wirtz-Peitz, F.; Gaitan, M.G.; Knoblich, J.A. Asymmetric Rab 11 endosomes regulate delta recycling and specify cell fate in the Drosophila nervous system. *Cell* **2005**, *122*, 763–773. [CrossRef]

120. Jafar-Nejad, H.; Andrews, H.K.; Acar, M.; Bayat, V.; Wirtz-Peitz, F.; Mehta, S.Q.; Knoblich, J.A.; Bellen, H.J. Sec15, a component of the exocyst, promotes notch signaling during the asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursors. *Dev. Cell* **2005**, *9*, 351–363. [CrossRef]

121. Giagtzoglou, N.; Yamamoto, S.; Zitserman, D.; Graves, H.K.; Schulze, K.L.; Wang, H.; Klein, H.; Roegiers, F.; Bellen, H.J. dEHBP1 controls exocytosis and recycling of Delta during asymmetric divisions. *J. Cell Biol.* **2012**, *196*, 65–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

122. Langevin, J.; Morgan, M.J.; Sibarita, J.B.; Aresta, S.; Murthy, M.; Schwarz, T.; Camonis, J.; Bellaiche, Y. Drosophila exocyst components Sec5, Sec6, and Sec15 regulate DE-Cadherin trafficking from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane. *Dev. Cell* **2005**, *9*, 365–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

123. Leibfried, A.; Fricke, R.; Morgan, M.J.; Bogdan, S.; Bellaiche, Y. Drosophila Cip4 and WASp define a branch of the Cdc42-Par6-aPKC pathway regulating E-cadherin endocytosis. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2008**, *18*, 1639–1648. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

124. Georgiou, M.; Marinari, E.; Burden, J.; Baum, B. Cdc42, Par6, and aPKC regulate Arp2/3-mediated endocytosis to control local adherens junction stability. *Curr. Biol. CB* **2008**, *18*, 1631–1638. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

125. Glashauser, J.; Camelo, C.; Hollmann, M.; Backer, W.; Jacobs, T.; Sanchez, J.I.; Schleutker, R.; Forster, D.; Berns, N.; Riechmann, V.; et al. Acute manipulation and real-time visualization of membrane trafficking and exocytosis in Drosophila. *Dev. Cell* **2023**, *58*, 709–723.e7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

126. Bruelle, C.; Pinot, M.; Daniel, E.; Daude, M.; Mathieu, J.; Le Borgne, R. Cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic roles of the ESCRT-III subunit Shrub in abscission of Drosophila sensory organ precursors. *Development* **2023**, *150*, dev201409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

127. Huenniger, K.; Kramer, A.; Soom, M.; Chang, I.; Kohler, M.; Depping, R.; Kehlenbach, R.H.; Kaether, C. Notch1 signaling is mediated by importins alpha 3, 4, and 7. *Cell. Mol. Life Sci.* **CMLS** **2010**, *67*, 3187–3196. [CrossRef]

128. Sachan, N.; Mishra, A.K.; Mutsuddi, M.; Mukherjee, A. The Drosophila importin-alpha3 is required for nuclear import of notch in vivo and it displays synergistic effects with notch receptor on cell proliferation. *PLoS ONE* **2013**, *8*, e68247. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.