<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# Evaluation of Different AI online Tools for General Scientific Research and Scientific Publication

Joseph Shenekji

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Joseph Shenekji. Evaluation of Different AI online Tools for General Scientific Research and Scientific Publication. Journal of Advances in Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence, In press. hal-04977951

HAL Id: hal-04977951

https://hal.science/hal-04977951v1

Submitted on 5 Mar 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

Public Domain
Evaluation of Different AI online Tools for General Scientific Research and Scientific Publication

Dr. Joseph G. Shenekji[1]

[1] Department of Biotechnology Engineering, faculty of technical Engineering, University of Aleppo, Syria.

**Abstract** AI tools became a new trend in various fields in life including medicine and media and art, as for scientific research tools, they are few in comparison with other fields, but recently; many scientific research aiding tools merged or previous tools integrated AI in their structure, which created a new opportunity to advance scientific research in different sciences such as Biotechnology and precision medicine and astronomy and quantum physics.

This research tested different freely available online AI tools used for different purposes in the general scientific research methodology, of which there is citation, summarizing, searching in different references, collecting data and categorizing them, translating, quotation, explanation of difficult scientific texts and detecting Plagiarism, grammar checkers, image creators, presentation creator for the display of research, and chatting with PDF files of the research. These mentioned aspects are necessary for all types of research and for publication, and these tools were tested in arabic also to see the ones that are appropriate to arabic shared research.

Parameters for evaluating AI tools included: availability, time consumption, accuracy, additional features provided in comparance with other AI tools and traditional non-AI Tools.

By comparing and evaluating these AI tools, we observed that each tool serve in one characteristic more than the other, and Quillbot, scispace, Monica ai, and Gemini chatbot provided by Google Incorporation showed the relative best results. Although this research provides a straight forward primary evaluation for these tools, Further studies are required to assess them in a statistically and more accurate method in a certain specialty in science. However, our results can be useful general scientific research processes, and can help researchers save a great amount of time in routine research. assignments.

**Resumen** Las herramientas de IA abstractas se han convertido en una nueva tendencia en diversos campos de la vida, incluyendo medicina, medios y arte. En cuanto a herramientas de investigación científica, son escasas en comparación con otros campos, pero recientemente han surgido muchas herramientas de apoyo a la investigación científica con IA integrada o se han incorporado capacidades de IA en herramientas existentes, creando nuevas oportunidades para avanzar en investigaciones científicas en disciplinas como biotecnología, medicina de precisión, astronomía y física cuántica.

Esta investigación evaluó distintas herramientas de IA disponibles gratuitamente en línea, utilizadas para diversos propósitos en la metodología general de investigación científica: citación, resumen, búsqueda en referencias, recopilación y categorización de datos, traducción, citación textual, explicación de textos científicos complejos, detección de plagio, correctores gramaticales, creadores de imágenes, generadores de presentaciones para exposiciones y chatbots para interactuar con archivos PDF de investigaciones. Estos aspectos son esenciales para todo tipo de investigación y publicación, y las herramientas también se probaron en árabe para identificar aquellas adecuadas para investigaciones compartidas en este idioma.

Los parámetros de evaluación incluyeron: disponibilidad, consumo de tiempo, precisión, características adicionales en comparación con otras herramientas de IA y herramientas tradicionales sin IA.

Al comparar estas herramientas, observamos que cada una sobresale en una característica específica. Quillbot, SciSpace, Monica AI y el chatbot Gemini de Google mostraron los mejores resultados relativos. Aunque este estudio proporciona una evaluación primaria directa, se requieren más análisis para valorarlas con métodos estadísticos y mayor precisión en especialidades científicas concretas. No obstante, nuestros resultados pueden optimizar procesos generales de investigación científica y ayudar a investigadores a ahorrar tiempo significativo en tareas rutinarias.

**Keywords:** AI tools, Scientific research, Plagiarism detection, Data analysis
# 1 Introduction

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various fields has revolutionized the way we work, learn, and interact. Scientific research, a cornerstone of human progress, is no exception. AI tools have emerged as valuable assets, offering potential to streamline processes, enhance efficiency, and uncover new insights. While AI has made significant strides in other domains, its application to scientific research is still relatively nascent, presenting opportunities for exploration and innovation.

AI systems are capable of producing high-quality summaries and translations, which improves the accessibility and comprehension of scientific material for a variety of audiences (Peng et al. 2023). In order to improve the communication of scientific knowledge, AI algorithms can create summaries of scientific publications and translate them into news articles, press releases, and plain-language writings (Razack et al. 2021). AI-powered solutions can automate the extraction of data from systematic reviews, saving time and money while improving the dependability and quality of the data that is extracted (Özkan et al. 2023). When it comes to screening articles for systematic reviews, AI technologies have demonstrated high accuracy and comparable performance to human assessors (Burns et al. 2021). AI helps maintain the integrity of scientific publishing by being able to recognize mistakes in published content, including plagiarism, and forecast the influence of unpublished articles on citations (Razack et al. 2021).

In order to ensure the authenticity of academic work, AI-based apps may also detect AI-generated content with high accuracy (Juárez et al. 2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) systems can help streamline the manuscript preparation process by rewriting content for various target groups, increasing or decreasing word counts, and improving writing style (Anderson et al. 2023).

Researchers can concentrate on more creative and strategic parts of their work by using AI to automate repetitive writing activities (Huang et al. 2023). Above all, human monitoring is necessary to confirm the authenticity and validity of content generated by AI in scientific research, preventing misuse and guaranteeing ethical standards are met (Hill et al. 2023). Regulatory agencies underline that human writers are ultimately responsible for work generated by AI, and that AI tools should not be labeled as co-authors (Abd-Elsalam et al. 2023) (Bereton et al. 2023).

By evaluating different ai tools, we seek to provide researchers with valuable insights into their capabilities, limitations, and potential applications. This information can help researchers make informed decisions when selecting AI tools to complement their work and optimize their research efforts.

# 2 Methodology

## 1. Tool Selection

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify freely available online AI tools that are relevant to general scientific research. The tools were selected based on their ability to support various aspects of the research process, including citation, summarizing, searching, data collection, translation, quotation, explanation, plagiarism detection, grammar checking, image creation, presentation creation, and chatbot interactions.

AI tools that were evaluated by experimenting in this research were:

Zotero, Mendeley, Citethisforme, Consensus, Endnote, Quillbot, Jasper.Ai, TLDR This, Summarizebot, Lingualeo, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, Semantic Scholar, Perplexity, Pubmed, Elicit, KNIME, Rapidminer, Trifacta, Pandas, Google Translate, Deepl Translator, Microsoft Translator, Yandex Translate, Monica.Ai, Grammarly, Citingmachine, Easybib, Bibme, Zotero, Gemini, Monica.Ai, Sider.Ai, Scispace, Bing Chat, Quillbot, Grammarly, Viper, Copyscape, Quetext, Grammarly, Prowritingaid, Quillbot, DALL-E, Midjourney, Deepart, Bing Image Creator, Canva, Prezi, Simplified.Ai, Beautiful.Ai, Google Slides, Chatgpt, Monica AI, Scispace, PDF Chatbot, Chatpdf.
Some of them are old tools that integrated AI, of traditional tools that are used for comparison with AI tools.

## 2. Evaluation Parameters

The following parameters were used to evaluate the performance of the selected AI tools:

## 3. Availability

The accessibility of the tools in low- and middle-income countries and its free plan, including its compatibility with different devices and operating systems especially the ubiquitous ones.

## 4. Time Consumption

The efficiency of the tools in completing tasks, measured in terms of time taken to generate results, less than 15 seconds was low consumption from 15-30 seconds was moderate, and more than 30 seconds was high.

## 5. Accuracy

The reliability and correctness of the output generated by the tools, assessed by comparing it to human-generated results or known standards when results are cross checked.

## 6. Additional Features

The range of functionalities offered by the tools beyond the core tasks, such as integration with other software or specialized features for specific research domains.

To evaluate the tools against the defined parameters, a series of tests were conducted using a diverse dataset of scientific articles, research data, and queries, and according to the output, a descriptive table of each tool features was filled.

## 1. Results

After testing several available ai tools, the following results showed:

For citation, consensus showed the best results, for it provided ease of access and several methods for citation, while second best zotero, but it needed to download a software to you desktop. In the summarizing field, quillbot was the best candidate because of its accompanying features like rephrasing and ai detection, and it is user friendly. Google scholar and perplexity were the best candidates for finding different references related to a certain topic. Elicit was found to be the best candidate to extract and collect data and categorize it in columns from different references in a fast and easy manner. In the translation feature, monica.ai assistant showed mose accurate and convenient results. While zotero was giving decent output in quotation. Gemini google chatbot was the best candidate in explaining difficult scientific texts and simplifying them, which can help students and non-experts understand difficult specialised texts.

Quillbot gave good results in detecting plagiarism, which can help researchers and professors evade problems from students trying to take a shortcut in scientific writing, and it also provided an essential tool for grammar checking along with grammarly. As in image creation and presentation creation, bing image creator helped in creating attracting images fast but without any scientific accuracy, and in presentation making; simplified was helpful creating in 30 seconds a template with text and images in the presentation, but it needed effort in entering data and charts.

The most useful tool found in pdf chatting, that can help in understanding and extracting and explaining texts from published papers in pdf format, scispace and Monica ai, gave a very useful result that can reduce time of reading of pdf to an estimated 10% of the time needed before.

## 2. All results found by experimenting were documented in table 1.
<table><caption>Table1: a general evaluation of different ai tools used in scientific research.</caption><thead><tr><th>Feature</th><th>Tool</th><th>Availability</th><th>Time Consumption</th><th>Accuracy</th><th>Arabic lang.</th><th>Additional Features</th><th>Ref.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Citation</td><td>Zotero</td><td>Free</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Open-source, browser integration</td><td>[11]</td></tr><tr><td>Mendeley</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>no</td><td>Social network for researchers</td><td>[12]</td></tr><tr><td>CiteThisForMe</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>no</td><td>Easy-to-use, multiple citation styles</td><td>[13]</td></tr><tr><td>consensus</td><td>free</td><td>low</td><td>high</td><td>yes</td><td>General, accurate</td><td>[14]</td></tr><tr><td>EndNote</td><td>Paid</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Comprehensive features, reference searching</td><td>[15]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Summarizing</td><td>Quillbot</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Paraphrasing, grammar checking</td><td>[16]</td></tr><tr><td>Jasper.ai</td><td>Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Versatile writing assistant</td><td>[17]</td></tr><tr><td>TLDR This</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Summarizes long articles</td><td>[18]</td></tr><tr><td>SummarizeBot</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Chatbot interface</td><td>[19]</td></tr><tr><td>LinguaLeo</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Language learning features</td><td>[20]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Searching in Different References</td><td>Google Scholar</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Comprehensive academic search</td><td>[21]</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Academic Search</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Stopped since 2020 - no AI involved</td><td>[22]</td></tr><tr><td>Semantic Scholar</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>AI-powered search, citation graph</td><td>[23]</td></tr><tr><td>perplexity</td><td>Free/paid</td><td>low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Search and citation, topic writing</td><td>[24]</td></tr><tr><td>PubMed</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Biomedical focus, extensive database</td><td>[25]</td></tr><tr><td>Collecting and Categorizing Data</td><td>Elicit</td><td>free/paid</td><td>low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Data science platform, automation, categorizing data in columns</td><td>[26]</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tbody><tr><td></td><td>KNIME</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Open-source, visual workflows</td><td>[27]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>RapidMiner</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Machine learning, data mining</td><td>[28]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Trifacta</td><td>Paid</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Data preparation, AI automation</td><td>[29]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Pandas</td><td>Free</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>Yes (with libraries)</td><td>Python library, data manipulation</td><td>[30]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Translating</td><td>Google Translate</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Wide language support</td><td>[31]</td></tr><tr><td>DeepL Translator</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>High-quality translations</td><td>[32]</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Translator</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Integrates with Microsoft products</td><td>[33]</td></tr><tr><td>Yandex Translate</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Supports multiple languages</td><td>[34]</td></tr><tr><td>monica.ai</td><td>free</td><td>Low</td><td>high</td><td>Yes</td><td>Parallel translation, fast, always available</td><td>[35]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Quotation</td><td>Grammarly</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Writing assistant, grammar checking</td><td>[36]</td></tr><tr><td>CitingMachine</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Easy-to-use, multiple citation styles</td><td>[37]</td></tr><tr><td>EasyBib</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Online tool, bibliography creation</td><td>[38]</td></tr><tr><td>BibMe</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Citation and bibliography generation</td><td>[39]</td></tr><tr><td>Zotero</td><td>Free</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Manages and inserts quotes</td><td>[11]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Explanation of Difficult Scientific Texts</td><td>Gemini</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Create and export tables and codes</td><td>[40]</td></tr><tr><td>monica.ai</td><td>Free/paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>Yes</td><td>Chrome extension, parallel translation</td><td>[35]</td></tr><tr><td>sider.ai</td><td>Free/paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Chrome extension, summarising texts</td><td>[41]</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tbody><tr><td></td><td>scispace</td><td>free/paid</td><td>low</td><td>High</td><td>yes</td><td>Ai detector, extract data</td><td>[42]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>bing chat</td><td>free/paid</td><td>low</td><td>high</td><td>yes</td><td>Referencing generated data</td><td>[43]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Detecting Plagiarism</td><td>quillbot</td><td>free/paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Fast and easy</td><td>[16]</td></tr><tr><td>Grammarly</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Also detects grammar issues</td><td>[36]</td></tr><tr><td>Viper</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Plagiarism detection</td><td>[44]</td></tr><tr><td>Copyscape</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Duplicate content detection</td><td>[45]</td></tr><tr><td>Quetext</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Identifies paraphrasing</td><td>[46]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Grammar Checkers</td><td>Grammarly</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Comprehensive grammar checking</td><td>[36]</td></tr><tr><td>ProWritingAid</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Style and grammar checking</td><td>[47]</td></tr><tr><td>quillbot</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>high</td><td>No</td><td>Simple, effective grammar checking</td><td>[16]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Image Creation</td><td>DALL-E</td><td>Paid</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Generates images from text</td><td>[48]</td></tr><tr><td>MidJourney</td><td>Paid</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>AI-powered image creation</td><td>[49]</td></tr><tr><td>DeepArt</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Mod.</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Transforms photos into artwork</td><td>[50]</td></tr><tr><td>Bing image creator</td><td>Paid</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Image and video editing</td><td>[51]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6">Presentation Creation</td><td>Canva</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Online design tool</td><td>[52]</td></tr><tr><td>Prezi</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Dynamic presentations</td><td>[53]</td></tr><tr><td>simplified.ai</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Presentations and videos</td><td>[54]</td></tr><tr><td>Beautiful.ai</td><td>Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>AI-powered presentations</td><td>[55]</td></tr><tr><td>Google Slides</td><td>Free</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Online presentation tool</td><td>[56]</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tr><td rowspan="5">Chatting with PDF Files</td><td>ChatGPT</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>Interacts with PDF files</td><td>[57]</td></tr><tr><td>Monica AI</td><td>Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Document interaction</td><td>[35]</td></tr><tr><td>SciSpace</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>No</td><td>Interacts with scientific papers</td><td>[42]</td></tr><tr><td>PDF Chatbot</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>Moderate</td><td>No</td><td>Interacts with PDF documents</td><td>[58]</td></tr><tr><td>Chatpdf</td><td>Free/Paid</td><td>Low</td><td>High</td><td>Yes</td><td>PDF annotation, no sign in required</td><td>[59]</td></tr></table>

## 3 Discussion

The evaluation of various AI tools for scientific research and publication reveals significant advancements in efficiency and accuracy, aligning with trends observed in recent literature. As noted by Burger et al. (2023), the integration of AI tools can streamline research processes, reducing time spent on literature reviews and data analysis. This study corroborates their findings by demonstrating that tools like Elicit and Consensus not only enhance data collection but also improve citation management, thus facilitating a more efficient workflow for researchers.

Moreover, the effectiveness of summarization tools, particularly Quillbot, aligns with the findings of Fitria (2023), who emphasized the importance of AI in distilling complex information into accessible formats. Our results indicate that AI-driven summarization can significantly aid researchers in grasping essential insights from extensive literature, thereby supporting informed decision-making.

However, while the benefits of these tools are evident, it is crucial to consider the limitations highlighted in the research. For instance, the reliance on AI for translation, as seen with Monica.ai, raises concerns regarding accuracy and context, particularly in specialized fields. This mirrors the concerns raised by Khalif et al. (2023), who cautioned against over-reliance on AI tools without adequate human oversight.

Furthermore, the ethical implications of using AI in research, particularly concerning plagiarism detection and content generation, remain a critical area of discussion. As noted by Panukhnyk et al. (2023), ensuring the integrity of scientific work while leveraging AI tools is paramount. This research highlights the necessity for ongoing evaluation and adaptation of these tools to address biases and ethical considerations, echoing the calls for more rigorous frameworks in AI-assisted research.

While AI tools present transformative opportunities for scientific research, a balanced approach that incorporates human judgment and ethical standards is essential for maximizing their potential.

## 4 Conclusion

Based on the comprehensive evaluation of AI tools for scientific research, it is evident that these tools offer significant benefits in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. The tools analyzed in this study demonstrated their capabilities in various tasks, including citation management, summarization, data analysis, and translation.
While the specific choice of AI tool may depend on individual research needs and preferences, several key trends emerged from this evaluation:

* **Specialized Tools:** Tools designed for specific scientific domains, such as SciSpace for literature search and Mendeley for citation management, often offer tailored features and better performance.

* **Cloud-Based Accessibility:** Many AI tools are now available as cloud-based applications, providing easy access and compatibility across different devices.

* **Integration with Other Tools:** The ability to integrate AI tools with other scientific software, such as data analysis platforms and word processors, enhances their usability and impact.

* **Free vs. Paid Plans:** While free plans can offer valuable features, paid subscriptions often provide access to more advanced capabilities and premium features.

This study only provides an overview of the current landscape of AI tools available for scientific research and publication. While tools like Quillbot, SciSpace, Monica AI, and Google's Gemini chatbot showed promising results, each evaluated tool demonstrated unique strengths. The integration of these AI tools into research workflows has the potential to significantly reduce time spent on routine tasks, allowing researchers to focus on more complex aspects of their work.

However, it is crucial to approach these tools with a critical mindset, understanding their limitations and potential biases. As AI technology continues to evolve, ongoing evaluation and adaptation of these tools will be necessary to ensure their effective and ethical use in scientific research.

In conclusion, AI tools have the potential to revolutionize scientific research by automating routine tasks, improving efficiency, and facilitating new discoveries. By carefully considering the specific requirements of your research and evaluating the available options, researchers can leverage AI tools to enhance their productivity and achieve their research goals.

# 5 Limitations and Future Research:

While this study provides a preliminary evaluation of AI tools for scientific research, several limitations should be noted, first, the evaluation was primarily qualitative and based on general usage scenarios and descriptive outcomes. Secondly, the sample size and diversity of research tasks may not fully represent all scientific disciplines and there is no statistical affirmation of the results. Thirdly, Rapid developments in AI technology may quickly render some findings outdated.

Future studies could tackle some aspects like; Conducting statistically rigorous evaluations of these tools within specific scientific disciplines along with searching for ai base statistical analysis tools that could benefit researchers, Assessing the long-term impact of AI tool usage on research quality and productivity. Investigating potential ethical considerations and biases in AI-assisted research processes.

# 6 References:

1. Peng, K., & May, A. (2023). Crossing the Rubicon? The future impact of artificial intelligence on headache medicine. *Cephalalgia*, 43. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231157379.

2. Razack, H., Mathew, S., Saad, F., & Alqahtani, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world. *Science Editing*. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.244.

3. Özkan, M., & Sasani, H. (2023). Discussion on the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools Usage in the Scientific World. *European Journal of Therapeutics*. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1837.
4. Burns, J., Etherington, C., Cheng-Boivin, O., & Boet, S. (2021). Using an artificial intelligence tool can be as accurate as human assessors in level one screening for a systematic review. *Health information and libraries journal*. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12413.

5. Revisión, A., Juárez, P., Baumgartner, R., & Baumgartner, S. (2023). THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. *Hatun Yachay Wasi*. https://doi.org/10.57107/hyw.v3i1.61.

6. Anderson, L., Kanneganti, D., Houk, M., Holm, R., & Smith, T. (2023). Generative AI as a Tool for Environmental Health Research Translation. *GeoHealth*, 7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GH000875.

7. Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. *American journal of cancer research*, 13 4, 1148-1154.

8. Hill, J., Harris, C., & Clegg, A. (2023). Methods for using Bing's AI-powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review. *Research synthesis methods*. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1689.

9. Abd-Elsalam, K., & Abdel-Momen, S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence's Development and Challenges in Scientific Writing. *Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research*. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2023.220363.1414.

10. Brereton, T., Malik, M., Lifson, M., Greenwood, J., Peterson, K., & Overgaard, S. (2023). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Model Documentation in Translational Science: Scoping Review. *Interactive Journal of Medical Research*, 12. https://doi.org/10.2196/45903.

11. https://www.zotero.org/

12. https://www.mendeley.com/

13. https://www.citethisforme.com/

14. https://www.consolidus.app/

15. https://www.endnote.com/

16. https://www.quillbot.com/

17. https://www.jasper.ai/

18. https://tldrthis.com/

19. https://www.summarizebot.com/

20. https://lingualeo.com/

21. https://scholar.google.com/

22. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/academic/publications/

23. https://www.semanticscholar.org/

24. https://www.perplexity.ai/

25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

26. https://elicit.org/

27. https://www.knime.com/

28. https://www.rapidminer.com/

29. https://www.trifacta.com/

30. https://pandas.pydata.org/

31. https://translate.google.com/

32. https://www.deepl.com/

33. https://translator.microsoft.com/

34. https://translate.yandex.com/
35. https://www.monica.ai/

36. https://www.grammarly.com/

37. https://www.citingmachine.com/

38. https://www.easybib.com/

39. https://www.bibme.org/

40. https://gemini.google.com/

41. https://www.sider.ai/

42. https://typeset.io/

43. https://www.bing.com/chat

44. https://www.scanmyessay.com/

45. https://www.copyscape.com/

46. https://www.quetext.com/

47. https://prowritingaid.com/

48. https://openai.com/dall-e

49. https://www.midjourney.com/

50. https://deepart.io/

51. https://www.bing.com/create

52. https://www.canva.com/

53. https://prezi.com/

54. https://simplified.com/

55. https://www.beautifui.ai/

56. https://slides.google.com/

57. https://chat.openai.com/

58. https://www出于pdf.com/

59. https://www出于pdf.com/

60. Burger, B., Kanbach, D., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-02-2023-0156.

61. Fitria, T. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. *Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities*. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233.

62. Khlaif, Z., Mousa, A., Hattab, M., Itmazi, J., Hassan, A., Sanmugam, M., & Ayyoub, A. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. *JMIR Medical Education, 9*. https://doi.org/10.2196/47049.

63. Panukhnyk, O. (2023). Policy of academic and research integrity in the conditions of the AI revolution: formula of interaction. *Galic'kij ekonomičnij visnik*. https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2023.05.185.