# Microbubbles decorated with dendronized magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical imaging: effective stabilization via fluorous interactions

Da Shi, Justine Wallyn, Dinh-Vu Nguyen, Francis Perton, Delphine Felder-Flesch, Sylvie Bégin-Colin, Mounir Maaloum, Marie Pierre Krafft

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Da Shi, Justine Wallyn, Dinh-Vu Nguyen, Francis Perton, Delphine Felder-Flesch, et al., Microbubbles decorated with dendronized magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical imaging: effective stabilization via fluorous interactions. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2019, 10, pp.2103-2115. 10.3762/bj-nano.10.205. [hal-02410245](https://hal.science/hal-02410245)

HAL Id: hal-02410245

https://hal.science/hal-02410245

Submitted on 13 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Microbubbles decorated with dendronized magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical imaging: effective stabilization via fluorous interactions

Da Shi¹, Justine Wallyn¹, Dinh-Vu Nguyen², Francis Perton², Delphine Felder-Flesch², Sylvie Bégin-Colin², Mounir Maaloum¹ and Marie Pierre Krafft*¹

Full Research Paper

Open Access

Address:

¹Institut Charles Sadron (CNRS), University of Strasbourg, 23 rue du Loess, 67034 Strasbourg, France and ²Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg (IPCMS), University of Strasbourg, 23 rue du Loess, 67034 Strasbourg, France

Email:

Marie Pierre Krafft* - krafft@unistra.fr

Keywords:

diagnostic imaging; fluorinated dendrons; fluorocarbon; iron oxide nanoparticles; magnetic nanoparticles; microbubbles

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 2103–2115.
doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.205

Received: 04 July 2019

Accepted: 02 October 2019

Published: 31 October 2019

This article is part of the thematic issue "Nanoarchitectonics: bottom-up creation of functional materials and systems".

Guest Editor: K. Ariga

© 2019 Shi et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.

License and terms: see end of document.

## Abstract

Dendrons fitted with three oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG) chains, one of which contains a fluorinated or hydrogenated end group and bears a bisphosphonate polar head ($C_nX_{2n+1}OEG_8Den$, $X = F$ or $H$; $n = 2$ or 4), were synthesized and grafted on the surface of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) for microbubble-mediated imaging and therapeutic purposes. The size and stability of the dendronized IONPs ($IONP@C_nX_{2n+1}OEG_8Den$) in aqueous dispersions were monitored by dynamic light scattering. The investigation of the spontaneous adsorption of $IONP@C_nX_{2n+1}OEG_8Den$ at the interface between air or air saturated with perfluorohexane and an aqueous phase establishes that exposure to the fluorocarbon gas markedly increases the rate of adsorption of the dendronized IONPs to the gas/water interface and decreases the equilibrium interfacial tension. This suggests that fluorous interactions are at play between the supernatant fluorocarbon gas and the fluorinated end groups of the dendrons. Furthermore, small perfluorohexane-stabilized microbubbles (MBs) with a dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) shell that incorporates $IONP@C_nX_{2n+1}OEG_8Den$ (DPPC/Fe molar ratio 28:1) were prepared and subsequently characterized using both optical microscopy and an acoustical method of size determination. The dendrons fitted with fluorinated end groups lead to smaller and more stable MBs than those fitted with hydrogenated groups. The most effective result is already obtained with $C_2F_5$, for which MBs of ≈1.0 µm in radius reach a half-life of ≈6.0 h. An atomic force microscopy investigation of spin-coated mixed films of DPPC/IONP@$C_2X_5OEG_8Den$ combinations (molar ratio 28:1) shows that the IONPs grafted with the fluorinated dendrons are located within the phospholipid film, while those grafted with the hydrocarbon dendrons are located at the surface of the phospholipid film.

<footnote>* Corresponding author</footnote>
Introduction

Microbubbles (MBs), that is, micrometer-sized gas particles
dispersed in an aqueous medium, are clinically used as contrast
agents for ultrasound imaging, including molecular imaging,
and actively investigated for surgical ablation, targeted drug and
gene delivery [1-10]. They are also being examined for use, in
conjunction with focused ultrasound, and under magnetic reso-
nance imaging guidance, for achieving blood/brain and blood/
tumor barrier crossing of drugs [11,12]. Medical MBs have a
shell consisting of surfactants, phospholipids, or polymers and
are usually stabilized by a fluorocarbon gas [13] that acts as an
osmotic agent [14,15] and as a co-surfactant to phospholipids
[16] and block co-polymers [17].

Nanoparticles can be attached to the bubble shells to extend
their diagnostic and therapeutic potential by combining multi-
modal imaging, drug or gene delivery, and/or enhancement and
control of the acoustic signal for energy deposition, as is re-
quired for sonothrombolysis or ablation surgery. MBs incorpo-
rating iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are sought after as dual
contrast agents for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
[18-20] and drug delivery [21,22]. The shells of the presently
available MBs that incorporate IONPs are often made of poly-
mers. For example, ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles were embedded in the wall of poly(butyl cyano-
acrylate)-based MBs, allowing the blood-brain barrier penetra-
tion to be monitored [23]. Soft-shell colloids called lipospheres
have also been reported for enhanced gene and drug delivery
[24]. These lipospheres consist of gas-filled spheres coated by a
film of soybean oil that encases the cargo of nanoparticles and
is itself contained within a film of phospholipids [24]. Both
polymer-shelled MBs and lipospheres have some advantages
and some limitations [25]. In both cases, the shells can be
custom-made to enhance stability, circulation duration, drug-
loading capacity and release rate, targeting the fusion with cell
membranes [24]. Both types of constructs are generally more
stable, but less echogenic than “true” gas microbubbles, due to
the dampening effect of the polymer shell or oil contained in the
phospholipid coating [24,25]. One important difficulty encoun-
tered in the preparation of such magnetic MBs is that IONPs
rapidly aggregate in aqueous media [25]. Commercially avail-
able 50 nm magnetic IONPs coated with phospholipids allowed
for the preparation of MBs that enabled transfection of neurob-
lastoma cells with a generic, fluorescent, small, interfering
RNA under magnetic and ultrasound fields [26].

In the present work, we incorporated IONPs coated by dendritic
phosphonates bearing oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG) chains into
the phospholipid shell of the MBs. OEG chains were selected in
order to improve the dispersibility of the IONPs in water
[27,28]. Dendritic phosphonates are effective anchoring agents

due to the covalent PO–metal bonds that stabilize aqueous
dispersions of IONPs [27,29]. Such dendronized IONPs have
been investigated for hyperthermia and magnetic resonance
imaging owing to their increased stability in aqueous media and
biocompatibility [27,28]. An even stronger anchoring agent
consisting of a dendron structure bearing a bisphosphonate
polar head provided increased colloidal stability in physiologi-
cal media [30]. To the best of our knowledge, the implementa-
tion of dendronized IONPs in phospholipid-shelled MBs has
not yet been reported. This approach is expected to combine
some advantages over existing methods, including the ability to
graft isolated IONPs instead of clusters at the MB surface, and
allowing the microbubbles to go undetected, thus potentially
minimizing the recourse to pegylated lipids.

We report here the preparation of perfluorohexane (F-hexane)-
stabilized MBs with a shell of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
(DPPC) that incorporates IONPs grafted with OEG bisphospho-
nate-headed dendrons. Four dendrons were synthesized and in-
vestigated that feature two phosphonic acids and three OEG
chains, including a longer one in the para position. The latter
was fitted with a fluorinated (C₂F₅ or C₄F₉) or a hydrogenated
(C₂H₅ or C₄H₉) end group (CₙX₂n+₁OEG₈Den, X = F and H;
n = 2 and 4, Figure 1). First, we present the synthesis and the
characterization of the IONPs grafted with the selected
dendrons (IONP@CₙX₂n+₁OEG₈Den). Second, we report the
adsorption kinetics of IONP@CₙX₂n+₁OEG₈Den at the
interface between air or F-hexane-saturated air and water.
Third, we discuss the size and stability characteristics of

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
F-hexane-stabilized DPPC-shelled MBs incorporating IONP@CₓX₂n+₁OEG₈Den. Fourth, we report an atomic force microscopy (AFM) study that reveals that the location of the dendronized nanoparticles in the phospholipid film strongly depends on the nature of the terminal group.

# Results and Discussion

## Synthesis and grafting of dendrons on iron oxide nanoparticles

The OEG dendrons were synthesized as described in the Experimental section. Briefly, the piperazine scaffold was selected as an appropriate template to introduce the perfluoroalkylated or alkylated chain on a generation 1 bisphosphonic dendron bearing three OEG chains [31]. In order to facilitate the insertion and increase the visibility of the perfluoroalkylated (or alkylated) end group in the microbubble wall, the central OEG chain carrying the piperazine moiety was lengthened (Figure 1a). A multistep chemical sequence allowed for the production of bisphosphonate dendrons at a reasonable yield (55–80%). IONPs (mean diameter of 9.0 ± 0.9 nm) were synthesized by thermal decomposition of iron (II) stearate in the presence of oleic acid in dioctyl ether, which enables better control of the size, morphology and composition of the IONPs [32]. The four dendrons were grafted on the magnetic IONPs by direct exchange of the ligand (oleic acid) according to [33]. The excess dendron material was removed by ultrafiltration. The grafting of the dendrons on the IONPs was assessed by infrared spectroscopy (IR), which showed a significant reduction of the oleic acid alkyl bands (2926–2850 cm⁻¹) and the appearance of the OEG signal (1096 cm⁻¹) (Supporting Information File 1, Figure S1). The grafting of the dendrons on the IONPs was also confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS, Figure 2). The

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2:** Hydrodynamic diameter distributions of IONPs grafted with dendrons: C₂H₅OEG₈Den (38 ± 1 nm, black), C₂F₅OEG₈Den (37 ± 1 nm, red), C₄H₉OEG₈Den (95 ± 12 nm, orange), C₄F₉OEG₈Den (197 ± 15 nm, blue) in aqueous dispersions (Fe conc. 0.05 mg mL⁻¹).</figcaption></figure>

hydrodynamic mean diameter of IONP@C₂X₅OEG₈Den (X = F or H) was ≈37 nm, which is significantly larger than the mean diameter of the oleic-acid-covered IONPs (≈10 nm, Supporting Information File 1, Figure S2). This can be ascribed to the fact that a corona of OEG chains is now present around the nanoparticle and captures molecules of water, which contributes to a further increase of the hydrodynamic radius. The mean diameter of the IONP@C₄X₉OEG₈Den materials was larger, namely ≈95 nm and ≈200 nm for X = H and F, respectively, revealing that aggregation occurs in aqueous media due to the hydrophobicity of the end group. Fortunately, this did not preclude performing the adsorption kinetics studies. Altogether, owing to their dendritic structure, the OEG chains were found to confer excellent dispersibility and stability to the IONPs [33].

## Adsorption kinetics of dendronized nanoparticles at the gas/liquid interface

The adsorption of the dendronized IONPs at the air/water and F-hexane-saturated air/water interface was first investigated using bubble profile analysis tensiometry. As described in our earlier reports [34,35], we first confirmed that F-hexane taken alone, when introduced into the gaseous phase of the tensiometer bubble, adsorbs rapidly onto the interface, as indicated by the instant reduction of the interfacial tension σ by ≈4 mN m⁻¹ (from 72 to 68 ± 0.5 mN m⁻¹, Supporting Information File 1, Figure S3). The concentration of Fe in the IONP dispersions was varied from 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻¹ mol L⁻¹. The variations of the interfacial tension σ over time are collected in Figure 3 and Table 1. The results show that, not surprisingly, σ decreases with increasing Fe concentration in all cases. The lowest σ values were obtained for the IONPs grafted with the fluorinated dendrons, reflecting their higher hydrophobicity. We also observed that exposure to F-hexane has two important consequences on the adsorption of the dendronized IONPs. First, the adsorption process is accelerated, and second, the equilibrium interfacial tensions are significantly lowered.

We have reported similar effects of the fluorocarbon gas on the adsorption of a range of molecules, including phospholipids [36], polymers [17], proteins [37], biomarkers [38] and CeO₂ nanoparticles [39]. But the most important finding here is that the fluorocarbon gas affects the adsorption of the IONPs differently, depending on whether the dendron carries a fluorinated end group or not. The interfacial tension at equilibrium (σeq) of the dendronized IONP dispersions and characteristic times of adsorption (τ) of the latter for various Fe concentrations are collected in Table 1. The τ values were determined by fitting the adsorption profiles (Figure 3) to an exponential decay function. The variations of σeq versus Fe concentration are plotted in Figure 4a. The differences (Δσeq) between σeq of dendronized IONPs exposed to air and those exposed to F-hexane-saturated
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3:** Adsorption kinetics of IONPs grafted with various dendrons measured at 25 °C: A) C₂H₅OEG₈Den, B) C₂F₅OEG₈Den, C) C₄H₉OEG₈Den and D) C₄F₉OEG₈Den, at various Fe concentrations: a) 0.1; b) 0.05; c) 10⁻²; d) 10⁻³ and e) 10⁻⁴ mg mL⁻¹. The dendronized IONPs were exposed to air (black) or to F-hexane-saturated air (red).</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1:** Characteristic adsorption time τ (h) and interfacial tension at equilibrium σeq (mN m⁻¹) of the IONPs grafted with hydrogenated or fluorinated dendrons.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Fe conc. (mol L<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th colspan="4">C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th colspan="4">C<sub>2</sub>F<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th colspan="4">C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th colspan="4">C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Air</th><th colspan="2">F-hexane</th><th colspan="2">Air</th><th colspan="2">F-hexane</th><th colspan="2">Air</th><th colspan="2">F-hexane</th><th colspan="2">Air</th><th colspan="2">F-hexane</th></tr><tr><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th><th>τ</th><th>σ<sub>eq</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">1 × 10<sup>-1</sup></td><td>0.58</td><td>56 ±</td><td>0.28</td><td>55 ±</td><td>0.56</td><td>55 ±</td><td>0.17</td><td>46 ±</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>0.05</td><td></td><td>0.03</td><td></td><td>0.05</td><td></td><td>0.02</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">5 × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>1.36</td><td>57 ±</td><td>1.11</td><td>56 ±</td><td>1.11</td><td>59 ±</td><td>0.56</td><td>53 ±</td><td>1.25</td><td>53 ±</td><td>1.11</td><td>51 ±</td><td>0.28</td><td>48 ±</td><td>0.03</td><td>42 ±</td></tr><tr><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>0.12</td><td></td><td>0.16</td><td></td><td>0.13</td><td></td><td>0.06</td><td></td><td>0.13</td><td></td><td>0.13</td><td></td><td>0.03</td><td></td><td>0.01</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">1 × 10<sup>-2</sup></td><td>1.31</td><td>60 ±</td><td>0.56</td><td>59 ±</td><td>2.22</td><td>58 ±</td><td>0.89</td><td>53 ±</td><td>2.22</td><td>65 ±</td><td>1.06</td><td>64 ±</td><td>0.33</td><td>49 ±</td><td>0.03</td><td>42 ±</td></tr><tr><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>0.20</td><td></td><td>0.14</td><td></td><td>0.26</td><td></td><td>0.11</td><td></td><td>0.30</td><td></td><td>0.12</td><td></td><td>0.03</td><td></td><td>0.01</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">1 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td><td>2.08</td><td>67 ±</td><td>0.42</td><td>65 ±</td><td>2.22</td><td>66 ±</td><td>0.56</td><td>58 ±</td><td>8.61</td><td>66 ±</td><td>4.72</td><td>66 ±</td><td>0.92</td><td>55 ±</td><td>0.06</td><td>49 ±</td></tr><tr><td>±</td><td>3</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>1</td><td>±</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>0.30</td><td></td><td>0.14</td><td></td><td>0.28</td><td></td><td>0.08</td><td></td><td>0.93</td><td></td><td>0.51</td><td></td><td>0.13</td><td></td><td>0.02</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">1 × 10<sup>-4</sup></td><td>18.61</td><td>70 ±</td><td>4.44</td><td>68 ±</td><td>38.89</td><td>66 ±</td><td>0.75</td><td>58 ±</td><td>10.28</td><td>65 ±</td><td>7.50</td><td>67 ±</td><td>0.78</td><td>60 ±</td><td>0.03</td><td>52 ±</td></tr><tr><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>±</td><td>±3</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>1.87</td><td></td><td>0.39</td><td></td><td>3.90</td><td></td><td>0.10</td><td></td><td>1.08</td><td></td><td>0.62</td><td></td><td>0.23</td><td></td><td>0.02</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

air are plotted as a function of Fe concentration (Figure 4b). The Δσeq are larger for the fluorinated dendrons than for their hydrogenated analogs (7.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.1 ± 1.0 mN m⁻¹).

These results indicate that in the presence of the fluorocarbon gas the surface excess of fluorinated dendrons is higher than for the hydrogenated analogs, or that the fluorinated dendrons form a more densely organized film at the interface. Either way,

these results strongly suggest the existence of fluorous interactions between the end groups of the dendrons and the supernatant fluorocarbon gas that facilitate the adsorption of the IONPs at the interface. The mutual interactions between fluorinated chains are known to be weak, yet effective attractive interactions can operate in water and organic solvents. For example, such interactions are responsible for the partition and segregation of F-alkyl chains, on which “fluorous” technology
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4:** a) Variation of the interfacial tension at equilibrium (σ<sub>eq</sub>, 25 °C) as a function of the Fe concentration in dispersions of IONPs grafted with dendrons (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: black; C<sub>2</sub>F<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: red; C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: orange and C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: blue) at the air (dashed line) and F-hexane-saturated air (solid line)/aqueous phase interface. b) Variation of the difference of the interfacial tension at equilibrium (Δσ<sub>eq</sub>) measured under air and under F-hexane-saturated air versus Fe concentration for various IONPs (same color code). The green arrows highlight the difference in behavior between fluorinated and non-fluorinated dendrons.</figcaption></figure>

gies are based that are used in many synthesis and separation
processes [40]. However, studies of such interactions published
to date are restricted to liquid/liquid and solid/liquid interfaces
[41,42]. In contrast, the potential of fluorocarbon gases to
develop attractive fluorous interactions at the gas/water inter-
face has only recently been demonstrated [38]. It is noteworthy
that the interactions between fluorinated chains are reinforced
by very effective hydrophobic repulsion caused by the prox-
imity of the water phase.

Figure 5 depicts the inverse of the characteristic adsorption time (1/τ) as a function of the Fe concentration of the dendronized IONPs. The 1/τ values increase with increasing Fe concentration (Figure 5a), except for the C₄F₉OEG₈Den case, for which adsorption is only slightly increased (under air) or remains constant (under F-hexane). In all cases, the adsorption of the IONPs is accelerated by exposure to the F-hexane gas (solid lines). The magnitude of this effect depends on the degree of

fluoration of the dendron. The differences between the 1/τ
values measured under air and under F-hexane exposure (Δ1/τ)
are collected for each dendronized IONP in Figure 5b. The
largest Δ1/τ values are obtained for the dendron fitted with the
C₄F₉ end group, which indicates that the strength of the interac-
tions between F-hexane and the terminal group increases with
the number of fluorinated carbons of the latter.

Preparation and characterization of
microbubbles incorporating dendronized iron
oxide nanoparticles

Our microbubbles were prepared by mixing aqueous disper-
sions of DPPC and dendronized IONPs conditioned in vials that
have a dead volume saturated with F-hexane, in a VialMix
shaker (Experimental section). The size and stability character-
istics of the F-hexane-stabilized microbubbles prepared with
DPPC and dendronized IONPs were investigated by optical
microscopy and ultrasound wave attenuation analysis. MBs

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5:** a) Variation of the inverse of the characteristic adsorption time (1/τ) of the IONPs grafted with dendrons (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: black; C<sub>2</sub>F<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: red; C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: orange; C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den: blue) at the air (dashed) and F-hexane-saturated air (solid line)/aqueous phase interface. b) Variation of the differences of 1/τ measured under air and F-hexane-saturated air (Δ1/τ) as a function of the Fe concentration (same color code).</figcaption></figure>
stabilized by a shell of DPPC were investigated for comparison. Our acoustic device measures the variation of the attenuation coefficient of an ultrasound wave as a function of its frequency at the initial measuring time in the measuring cell (Experimental section). The change of the radius distributions over time is calculated from the attenuation curves. To this end, the bubble fraction is plotted against time allowing for the determination of the half-life of the bubbles [38]. The size and stability characteristics of the MBs incorporating the dendronized IONPs in their DPPC shell are provided in Table 2 and Figure 6.

The addition of dendronized IONPs led to a significant change in the MB mean radius and the size distribution for all the dendronized IONPs investigated, confirming their presence in the MB shell. A mean radius as small as 1.0 ± 0.2 µm was obtained with the fluorinated dendrons C₂F₅OEG₈Den and C₄F₉OEG₈Den, which is comparable to that measured for a

non-dendronized DPPC shell. By comparison, the use of hydrogenated dendrons led to an increase in the MB mean radius. The stability of the MBs prepared with the fluorinated IONPs, given by the half-life of the corresponding bubbles, was also significantly higher than for those prepared with non-fluorinated NPs and, at least for C₂F₅OEG₈Den (6.1 ± 0.9 h), comparable to that of DPPC (6.8 ± 0.5 h; Table 2 and Figure 7). These differences in behavior that depend on the fluorination of the dendron indicate that florous interactions exist between F-hexane in the gas core and the fluorinated NPs and play a significant role for the MB size and stability characteristics.

## AFM analysis of spin-coated films of DPPC, dendronized iron oxide nanoparticles and their mixtures

With the aim to understand if the dendronized IONPs are incorporated within the DPPC shell of the MBs or located at the sur-

<table><caption>**Table 2:** Physical characteristics of the DPPC microbubbles with dendronized IONPs, the mean bubble radius derived by optical microscopy (R<sub>mean</sub> (optical, µm)), the bubble radius obtained by the acoustical method (Raman (acoustical, µm)) and the determined half-life of the bubbles (t<sub>1/2</sub> (h)).</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>DPPC</th><th>DPPC/<br>C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th>DPPC/<br>C<sub>2</sub>F<sub>5</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th>DPPC/<br>C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th><th>DPPC/<br>C<sub>4</sub>F<sub>9</sub>OEG<sub>8</sub>Den</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>R<sub>mean</sub> (optical, µm)</td><td>0.9 ± 0.1</td><td>1.6 ± 0.2</td><td>1.0 ± 0.2</td><td>1.4 ± 0.1</td><td>1.0 ± 0.2</td></tr><tr><td>R<sub>mean</sub> (acoustical, µm)</td><td>0.8 ± 0.2</td><td>1.1 ± 0.2</td><td>0.9 ± 0.2</td><td>1.4 ± 0.2</td><td>1.2 ± 0.2</td></tr><tr><td>t<sub>1/2</sub> (h)</td><td>6.8 ± 0.5</td><td>3.6 ± 0.7</td><td>6.1 ± 0.9</td><td>1.3 ± 0.2</td><td>5.0 ± 0.9</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6:** Size distributions of DPPC and DPPC/dendronized IONP-shelled microbubbles stabilized with F-hexane (grey line: Gaussian fit of the size histograms derived from optical microscopy; red line: distributions obtained by the acoustical method). a) DPPC alone; b–e) DPPC/ IONP@C₇X₂ₙ+₁OEG₈Den mixtures with b) C₂H₅OEG₈Den; c) C₂F₅OEG₈Den; d) C₄H₉OEG₈Den, and e) C₄F₉OEG₈Den. The concentration of IONPs was 0.1 mg mL⁻¹; temperature 25 °C.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7:** Time evolution (25 °C) of the volume fraction of the DPPC microbubbles (dotted grey) and of the DPPC microbubbles incorporating various IONPs: IONP@C₂H₅OEG₈ (black); IONP@C₂F₅OEG₈ (red); IONP@C₄H₉OEG₈ (orange); IONP@C₄F₉OEG₈ (blue).</figcaption></figure>

face of the shell (Figure 8), mixed films composed of phospholipid and nanoparticles were prepared by spin-coating on silicon wafers. The morphology of the films was investigated by AFM in the peak-force tapping mode. We therefore selected

$C_2F_5OEG_8Den$, which is the dendron that led to the smallest and most stable MBs. The hydrocarbon analog $C_2H_5OEG_8Den$ was also investigated for comparison. The DPPC concentration was set in order to obtain a discontinuous DPPC film (i.e., DPPC domains), allowing for the measurement of the film height.

The mean height of both IONP@$C_2F_5OEG_8Den$ and IONP@$C_2H_5OEG_8Den$ is 10.0 ± 1.7 nm, as determined by a statistical analysis of the particles (Figure 9). Usually, it is observed that the nanoparticles are convoluted by the AFM probe, which decreases the lateral resolution of the technique. Both IONP samples are well-dispersed with no indication of aggregation. The films of spin-coated DPPC form large monolayer and small bilayer domains (Figure 10a). The profile measured on the magnified image (Figure 10b and Figure 10c) shows that the heights of the monolayer and bilayer are 1.5 ± 0.3 nm and 5.0 ± 1.0 nm, respectively. These measurements are in agreement with earlier reports [43].

Figure 11A shows an AFM topography image of a mixed film composed of DPPC and IONP@$C_2F_5OEG_8Den$. The IONPs are embedded within the DPPC monolayer domains in which they

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8:** Schematic representation of dendronized IONPs a) incorporated within the MB DPPC shell and b) located at the surface of this shell.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9:** AFM topography images (1 × 1 µm) and height profiles of a) IONP@$C_2F_5OEG_8Den$ and b) IONP@$C_2H_5OEG_8Den$. Dispersions of IONPs in ethanol (0.002 mg mL⁻¹) were spin-coated on silicon wafers.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10:** a) AFM topography image (4 × 4 µm) of a DPPC film spin-coated from an ethanol solution (0.5 mM); b) magnification (1 × 1 µm) of the square shown in a); c) height profile taken between the two green triangles in b).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 11:** a) AFM topography image (4 × 4 µm) of the mixed spin-coated films composed of DPPC and IONP@C₂H₅OEG₈Den (Panel A) and IONP@C₂H₅OEG₈Den (Panel B); b) magnification images (1 × 1 µm) of the white square shown in a); c) height profiles taken between the two green triangles in the corresponding image in b). Co-dispersions of DPPC (0.5 mM) and IONPs (0.002 mg mL⁻¹) in ethanol were spin-coated on silicon wafers.</figcaption></figure>

are well-dispersed, showing no tendency to aggregate. The profile (Figure 11Ac) measured on the magnified image (Figure 11Ab) clearly shows that the fluorinated IONPs are incorporated into the 1.5 nm thick DPPC monolayer. A different morphology is observed for the mixed film of DPPC and IONPs grafted with the hydrogenated dendron C₂H₅OEG₈Den. In this case, the domains formed by DPPC bilayers of ≈5 nm in height are omnipresent, while only a few domains of monolayers are observed (Figure 11Ba). It is seen that IONP@C₂H₅OEG₈Den are preferentially located in the regions of the wafer that are

devoid of phospholipid domains. The height profile measured on the magnification image (Figure 11Bb) shows two IONPs of ≈10 nm in height, clearly separated by a bilayer domain of ≈5 nm in height.

This difference can be explained by the fact that short fluorinated groups such as C₂F₅ can significantly increase the lipophilicity of molecules. This is the main reason why fluorine groups, such as CF₃ or C₂F₅, are incorporated into many drugs, as they significantly improve their biodistribution [44]. By
contrast, longer fluorinated chains, such as C₆F₁₃ or C₈F₁₇, are
well-known to confer a lipophobic character when grafted onto
molecules and to induce phase separation in fluorocarbon/
hydrocarbon mixtures [45,46]. These results tell us that the
dendronized IONPs fitted with a C₂F₅ group have a higher
affinity for the phospholipid film than those grafted with C₂H₅.

Conclusion

We report that small and highly stable magnetic MBs incorpo-
rating IONPs in their phospholipid shells can be obtained by
using IONPs dendronized with OEG chains. The latter signifi-
cantly increase the dispersibility of the nanoparticles in aqueous
media.

We demonstrate that exposure to a supernatant fluorocarbon gas
has a remarkable and considerable impact on the adsorption be-
havior of dendronized iron oxide nanoparticles and that the
magnitude of this effect depends on the nature of the end group
of the dendron grafted on the nanoparticles, which is either
fluorinated or hydrogenated. Introducing a short fluorinated
group at the end of the OEG chain is found to substantially
increase the rate of adsorption of the nanoparticles at the inter-
face with air and even more so when exposed to F-hexane-satu-
rated air. A more compact film is observed when the film of
nanoparticles is exposed to the fluorocarbon gas. This unex-
pected effect indicates that for the mixed film, at the interface,
interactions develop between the fluorinated end group of the
dendron and the fluorocarbon gas.

As a consequence of this new phenomenon, small and stable
fluorocarbon-stabilized microbubbles with a half-life of ≈6 h
can be obtained by admixing DPPC and iron oxide nanoparti-
cles that are grafted with a C₂F₅-terminated dendron. The
combined use of fluorinated dendrons and a supernatant fluoro-
carbon gas is a straightforward, effective method for preparing
magnetic microbubbles that could facilitate the development of
future applications in medicine.

Finally, the AFM analysis of the DPPC/iron oxide nanoparti-
cles films indicates that the fluorinated dendronized iron oxide
nanoparticles show a higher propensity to incorporate into
phospholipid films than into hydrogenated ones, possibly due to
the increased lipophilic character.

Experimental
Materials

1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) was purchased as
a dry powder (99% purity) from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster,
AL) and used as received. Perfluorohexane (98% pure) was
purchased from Fluorochem. Pluronic F-68 (a poly(ethylene
oxide)–poly(propylene oxide) triblock copolymer, M~w~≈8300,

purity >99%) and HEPES (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-2-
ethanesulfonic acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(Lyon, France). A HEPES buffer solution (20 mmol L⁻¹) in a
150 mmol L⁻¹ NaCl solution was prepared, and its pH was
adjusted to 7.4 with 1 N NaOH. Water was purified using a
Millipore system (surface tension 71.4 mN m⁻¹ at 20 °C, resis-
tivity 18.2 MΩ cm).

Synthesis of dendrons

The approach to the synthesis of the dendrons C₂F₅OEG₈Den
and C₄F₉OEG₈Den is described in [47]. From the intermediate
D2-2P, the piperazine unit was installed in two steps
(Scheme 1): 1) deprotection of the *tert*-butyl group and 2)
amide coupling by using HATU/DIPEA. Next, the removal of
the carboxybenzyl group by hydrogenolysis allows for the
introduction of the perfluoroalkyl chain via *N*-alkylation.
Finally, treatment with trimethylsilyl bromide produced the
desired fluorinated bisphosphonate dendron.

Characterization of C₂F₅OEG₈Den: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 7.25 (s, 2H), 6.84 (s, 1H), 6.79 (s, 2H), 4.22 (t, *J* = 4.5 Hz, 6H), 4.15 (t, *J* = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (t, *J* = 4.7 Hz, 4H), 3.80 (t, *J* = 4.7 Hz, 2H), 3.76–3.50 (m, 52H), 3.33 (s, 6H), 3.12–3.09 (m, 2H), 3.03 (d, ²*J*ₚ–*H* = 21.1 Hz, 4H), 2.65–2.62 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.16 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.68–1.62 (m, 2H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 172.3, 169.5, 160.1, 153.8, 142.4, 136.6, 130.5, 115.3, 107.8, 73.6, 73.0, 71.9, 71.7–71.3 (several peaks), 70.8, 70.1, 68.5, 67.4, 62.2, 59.1, 57.3, 41.0, 39.6, 34.2, 24.2 ppm; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CD₃OD) δ –86.9, –119.4 ppm; ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 22.7 ppm.

Characterization of C₄F₉OEG₈Den: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 7.25 (s, 2H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 6.78 (s, 2H), 4.22 (t, *J* = 4.5 Hz, 6H), 4.14 (t, *J* = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (t, *J* = 4.7 Hz, 4H), 3.80 (t, *J* = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 3.76–3.50 (m, 74H), 3.33 (s, 6H), 3.10–3.06 (m, 2H), 3.02 (d, ²*J*ₚ–*H* = 21.0 Hz, 4H), 2.64–2.59 (m, 2H), 2.32–2.21 (m, 2H), 1.89–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.63 (m, 2H) ppm; ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 172.3, 169.5, 160.1, 153.8, 142.4, 136.6, 130.5, 125.3, 115.3, 108.9, 79.3, 73.6, 73.0, 72.1, 71.9–71.3 (several peaks), 70.8, 70.0, 68.5, 67.4, 62.2, 59.1, 57.3, 52.9, 52.5, 43.7, 41.0, 39.6, 34.2, 30.8, 24.2, 18.7 ppm; ¹⁹F NMR (470 MHz, CD₃OD) δ –82.6, –115.6, –125.3, –127.1 ppm; ³¹P NMR (202 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 22.4 ppm.

Synthesis of dendronized iron oxide
nanoparticles

The synthesis is adapted from an earlier report [33]. In a
100 mL two-necked flask, iron(II) stearate (2.2 mmol, 1.38 g),
oleic acid (4.4 mmol, 1.24 g) and dioctyl ether (20 mL) were
mixed together. The resulting solution was heated to 120 °C for
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1:** Final steps of the synthesis of the dendrons C₂F₅OEG₈Den and C₄F₉OEG₈Den. a) TFA/CH₂Cl₂, then piperazine-NCBz, HATU, DIPEA/DMF; 99% (2 steps); b) H₂, Pd/C/MeOH, then perfluoroalkyl iodide, K₂CO₃/CH₃CN; 80% for C₂F₅ and 55% for C₄F₉; c) TMSBr/CH₂Cl₂; 79% for C₂F₅ and 80% for C₄F₉.</figcaption></figure>

1 h under magnetic stirring without a reflux condenser. The magnetic stirrer was removed and the condenser was connected to the flask. The solution was heated up to 298 °C for 2 h at a heating rate of 5 °C min⁻¹. After cooling, a black suspension was collected and precipitated by addition of acetone. Finally, the nanoparticles were washed three times with a mixture of CHCl₃/acetone (1:4). In a 30 mL vial, a nanoparticle suspension in tetrahydrofuran (THF) (5 mg of iron) was introduced together with the appropriate dendron (7 mg). The vial was filled with 25 mL of THF and the mixture was magnetically stirred for 24 h. The resulting nanoparticles were centrifuged after addition of cyclohexane, dispersed in water and separated by ultrafiltration. The grafting of the fluorinated end-group was evidenced using HR-MAS.

## Bubble profile analysis tensiometry

Axisymmetric bubble shape analysis was applied to a rising bubble of gas (air or *F*-hexane-saturated air) formed in a dispersion of dendronized IONPs in an aqueous phase (HEPES buffer). As described in [36], during the process of adsorption of the dendronized IONPs at the gas/liquid interface, the variation of the interfacial tension was acquired using a Tracker® tensiometer (Teclis, Civrieux d'Azergues, France). A 5 µL

bubble was formed at the end of a steel capillary that had a tip diameter of 1 mm. The rising bubble was saturated with *F*-hexane by purging a 1 mL syringe trice with *F*-hexane-saturated air sampled above liquid *F*-hexane. This syringe was then mounted immediately on the injection cell of the tensiometer, such that the rising bubble was formed. The pressure and concentration of the *F*-hexane-saturated vapor at 25 °C were set to 2.9 × 10⁴ Pa and 11.66 mol m⁻³ [14]. IONP dispersions with Fe concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10⁻⁴ mg mL⁻¹ were obtained by diluting the 1 mg mL⁻¹-concentrated stem aqueous dispersions with HEPES buffer. The IONP@C₄X₉OEG₈Den (X = F and H) aqueous dispersions were sonicated for 30 min (setting 5) before tensiometric measurement. The sonicator (Vibracell, Bioblock Scientific, Illkirch, France) was equipped with a 3 mm titanium probe and operated at 20 kHz with an output power of ≈600 W (duty cycle 40%).

## Preparation of the microbubbles

DPPC (50 mmol L⁻¹) and Pluronic F-68 (DPPC/F-68 molar ratio 10:1) were dispersed in a non-degassed HEPES buffer solution (0.9 mL) in a sealed glass vial (inner diameter of 13 mm, length of 35 mm) by magnetic stirring for 3–6 h at 50 °C. Pluronic F-68 was added to facilitate phospholipid
dispersion and foam formation. 100 µL of the dendronized
IONPs dispersion (Fe concentration of 1 mg mL⁻¹) were
injected into the dispersion. The dispersions were sonicated
under air in a sonication bath at 50 °C for 30 min. In the case of
IONP@C₄X₉OEG₈Den (X = H or F), presonication (2 min,
setting 5) under air was applied. N₂ was allowed to bubble
through three vials containing *F*-hexane before being flushed
above the aqueous phase into the sealed glass vial during 3 min
in order to saturate the gas phase with *F*-hexane. The resulting
dispersions were treated using a VialMix shaker (Bristol-Myers
Squibb, New York, NY) for 45 s under *F*-hexane-saturated N₂
at room temperature. The resulting foam was immediately
diluted to 10 mL of HEPES buffer. Size fractionation of the
microbubbles was achieved by flotation for 60 min.

Optical microscopy

A few droplets (three to four) of the bubble dispersion were positioned in a concave glass slide and covered with a glass slide. The samples were observed using a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope (transmission mode). Rapid image acquisition was obtained with a Lumenera Infinity 2 charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Lumenera, Ottawa, Canada). The mean radii of the bubbles were determined using ImageJ on 5–10 slides.

Acoustic size determination

The method exploits the sound attenuation undergone by multi-
frequency ultrasound waves that propagate through the aqueous
bubble dispersion. Standard simple-harmonic resonator curves
are fitted to measure the attenuation in order to infer the radii of
the bubbles. A low-power emitter is used to avoid alteration of
the bubble characteristics and stability. For further experimen-
tal details see [48]. Each measurement was repeated three
times for different bubble preparations. The volume of
the microbubble dispersion injected in the acoustic cell was
2 mL.

AFM topography analysis of mixed films of
DPPC and dendronized IONPs

Thin films of DPPC, dendronized IONPs and DPPC/
dendronized IONP mixtures were prepared by spin-coating on
silicon wafers [49]. To this end, a dispersion of dendronized
IONPs in water (1 mg L⁻¹) was freeze-dried and then dissolved
in ethanol for preparing a dispersion with a concentration of
0.1 mg mL⁻¹. 40 µL of this dispersion was added to 2 mL of a
1 mM-concentrated DPPC ethanol solution in order to obtain a
mixed DPPC/dendronized IONP spin-coated film that has the
same DPPC/Fe molar ratio as that used for the preparation of
the microbubbles (28:1). A 0.5 mM-concentrated mixed disper-
sion was obtained by diluting this 1 mM dispersion. Silicon
wafers were cleaned for 30 min in a sonication bath containing
ethanol/milli-Q water (1:1), followed by 2 min in a plasma

cleaner. A droplet (15 µL) of DPPC, dendronized IONPs or
mixed DPPC/dendronized IONP dispersions was deposited on a
silicon wafer and immediately spun for 1 min at 3000 rpm
(Spin150 from SPS, Semiconductor Production Systems
Europe). The spin-coated samples were placed under vacuum in
a desiccator for 15–20 h to fully evaporate the solvents. The
silicon wafers were stored at 4 °C until the AFM measurements.
AFM images were obtained by scanning the spin-coated films
using a Dimension AFM Icon (Bruker) instrument operated in
peak-force tapping mode. Peak-force AFM is based on the
peak-force tapping technology, in which the probe is oscillated
in a similar way as in the tapping mode, but at far lower reso-
nance frequency. Each time the tip and the sample are brought
together, a force curve is captured. Ultrasharp silicon tips on a
nitride lever were used (Bruker, ScanAsyst with a spring con-
stant of 0.4 N m⁻¹ and tip radius of ≈5 nm). During AFM
imaging, the force was reduced in order to avoid dragging of
molecules by the tip. The analysis of the images was conducted
in the integrated software. At least three different samples were
analyzed and several positions were scanned on the silicon
wafer for each sample. The error on measurements along the
z-axis was estimated at ±0.5 nm.

**Supporting Information**

Supporting Information File 1

Additional spectra.

[https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/content/
supplementary/2190-4286-10-205-S1.pdf]

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the European Regional Development
Fund (ERDF) in the framework of the INTERREG V Upper
Rhine program "Transcending borders with every project" for
financing the NANOTRANSMED project, including Ph.D.
(D.S. and F.P.) and post-doc (D.-V. N. and J.W.) scholarships.
J.W. acknowledges the CNRS GIS Fluor for a travel grant. Our
acknowledgements also go to E. Hamon and R. Recht for the
HR-MAS analyses (AERIAL, Strasbourg).

ORCID® iDs

Marie Pierre Krafft - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3379-2783

Preprint

A non-peer-reviewed version of this article has been previously published
as a preprint doi:10.3762/bxiv.2019.60.v1

**References**

1. Chong, W. K.; Papadopoulou, V.; Dayton, P. A. *Abdom. Radiol. **2018*, *43*, 762–772. doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1516-1
2. Jain, A.; Tiwari, A.; Verma, A.; Jain, S. K. *Drug Delivery Transl. Res.* **2018**, *8*, 150–164. doi:10.1007/s13346-017-0448-6

3. Wang, S.; Hossack, J. A.; Klibanov, A. L. *J. Drug Targeting* **2018**, *26*, 420–434. doi:10.1080/1061186x.2017.1419362

4. Lindner, J. R. *Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery* **2004**, *3*, 527–533. doi:10.1038/nrd1417

5. Wheatley, M. A.; Forsberg, F.; Dube, N.; Patel, M.; Oeffinger, B. E. *Ultrasound Med. Biol.* **2006**, *32*, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.08.009

6. Klibanov, A. L. *Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.* **2009**, *47*, 875–882. doi:10.1007/s11517-009-0498-0

7. Stride, E.; Ediringhe, M. *Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.* **2009**, *47*, 809–811. doi:10.1007/s11517-009-0510-8

8. Rychak, J. J.; Klibanov, A. L. *Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.* **2014**, *72*, 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.009

9. Sirsi, S. R.; Borden, M. A. *Theranostics* **2012**, *2*, 1208–1222. doi:10.7150/thno.4306

10. Ferrara, K. W.; Borden, M. A.; Zhang, H. *Acc. Chem. Res.* **2009**, *42*, 881–892. doi:10.1021/ar8002442

11. Aw, M. S.; Paniwnyk, L.; Losic, D. *Expert Opin. Drug Delivery* **2016**, *13*, 1383–1396. doi:10.1080/17425247.2016.1192123

12. Song, K.-H.; Harvey, B. K.; Borden, M. A. *Theranostics* **2018**, *8*, 4393–4408. doi:10.7150/thno.26869

13. Schutt, E. G.; Klein, D. H.; Mattrey, R. M.; Riess, J. G. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2003**, *42*, 3218–3235. doi:10.1002/anie.20020550

14. Kabalnov, A.; Bradley, J.; Flaim, S.; Klein, D.; Pelura, T.; Peters, B.; Otto, S.; Reynolds, J.; Schutt, E.; Weers, J. *Ultrasound Med. Biol.* **1998**, *24*, 751–760. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00033-7

15. Kabalnov, A.; Klein, D.; Pelura, T.; Schutt, E.; Weers, J. *Ultrasound Med. Biol.* **1998**, *24*, 739–749. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00034-9

16. Szijjártó, C.; Rossi, S.; Waton, G.; Krafft, M. P. *Langmuir* **2012**, *28*, 1182–1189. doi:10.1021/la2043944

17. Ando, Y.; Tabata, H.; Sanchez, M.; Cagna, A.; Koyama, D.; Krafft, M. P. *Langmuir* **2016**, *32*, 12461–12467. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01883

18. Yang, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Gu, N. *Biomaterials* **2009**, *30*, 3882–3890. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.051

19. Park, J. I.; Jagadeesan, D.; Williams, R.; Oakden, W.; Chung, S.; Stanisz, G. J.; Kumacheva, E. *ACS Nano* **2010**, *4*, 6579–6586. doi:10.1021/nn102248g

20. Liu, Z.; Lammers, T.; Ehling, J.; Fokong, S.; Bornemann, J.; Kiessling, F.; Gätjens, J. *Biomaterials* **2011**, *32*, 6155–6163. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.019

21. Mulvana, H.; Eckersley, R. J.; Tang, M.-X.; Pankhurst, Q.; Stride, E. *Ultrasound Med. Biol.* **2012**, *38*, 864–875. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.027

22. Stride, E.; Porter, C.; Prieto, A. G.; Pankhurst, Q. *Ultrasound Med. Biol.* **2009**, *35*, 861–868. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.11.010

23. Lammers, T.; Koczera, P.; Fokong, S.; Gremse, F.; Ehling, J.; Vogt, M.; Pich, A.; Storm, G.; van Zandvoort, M.; Kiessling, F. *Adv. Funct. Mater.* **2015**, *25*, 36–43. doi:10.1002/adfm.201401199

24. Unger, E. C.; McCreery, T. P.; Sweitzer, R. H.; Caldwell, V. E.; Wu, Y. *Invest. Radiol.* **1998**, *33*, 886–892. doi:10.1097/00004424-199812000-00007

25. Nguyen, P. N.; Nikolova, G.; Polavarapu, P.; Waton, G.; Phuoc, L. T.; Pourroy, G.; Krafft, M. P. *RSC Adv.* **2013**, *3*, 7743–7746. doi:10.1039/c3ra40908b

26. Owen, J.; Crake, C.; Lee, J. Y.; Carugo, D.; Beguin, E.; Khrapitchev, A. A.; Browning, R. J.; Sibson, N.; Stride, E. *Drug Delivery Transl. Res.* **2018**, *8*, 342–356. doi:10.1007/s13346-017-0366-7

27. Basly, B.; Felder-Flesch, D.; Perriat, P.; Billotey, C.; Taleb, J.; Pourroy, G.; Begin-Colin, S. *Chem. Commun.* **2010**, *46*, 985–987. doi:10.1039/b920348f

28. Felder-Flesch, D. *Dendrimers in Nanomedicine*, 1st ed.; Jenny Stanford Publishing: New York, NY, U.S.A., 2016. doi:10.1201/9781315364513

29. Daou, T. J.; Pourroy, G.; Greneche, J. M.; Bertin, A.; Felder-Flesch, D.; Begin-Colin, S. *Dalton Trans.* **2009**, *23*, 4442–4449. doi:10.1039/b823187g

30. Casset, A.; Jouhannaud, J.; Garofalo, A.; Spiegelhalter, C.; Nguyen, D.-V.; Felder-Flesch, D.; Pourroy, G.; Pons, F. *Int. J. Pharm.* **2019**, *556*, 287–300. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.024

31. Garofalo, A.; Parat, A.; Bordeianu, C.; Ghobril, C.; Kueny-Stotz, M.; Walter, A.; Jouhannaud, J.; Begin-Colin, S.; Felder-Flesch, D. *New J. Chem.* **2014**, *38*, 5226–5239. doi:10.1039/c4nj00654b

32. Sun, S.; Zeng, H.; Robinson, D. B.; Raoux, S.; Rice, P. M.; Wang, S. X.; Li, G. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2004**, *126*, 273–279. doi:10.1021/ja0380852

33. Walter, A.; Billotey, C.; Garofalo, A.; Ulhaq-Bouillet, C.; Lefèvre, C.; Taleb, J.; Laurent, S.; Vander Elst, L.; Muller, R. N.; Lartigue, L.; Gazeau, F.; Felder-Flesch, D.; Begin-Colin, S. *Chem. Mater.* **2014**, *26*, 5252–5264. doi:10.1021/cm5019025

34. Nguyen, P. N.; Veschgini, M.; Tanaka, M.; Waton, G.; Vandamme, T.; Krafft, M. P. *Chem. Commun.* **2014**, *50*, 11576–11579. doi:10.1039/c3cc47840h

35. Shi, D.; Liu, X.; Counil, C.; Krafft, M. P. *Langmuir* **2019**, *35*, 10025–10033. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03546

36. Nguyen, P. N.; Trinh Dang, T. T.; Waton, G.; Vandamme, T.; Krafft, M. P. *ChemPhysChem* **2011**, *12*, 2646–2652. doi:10.1002/cphc.201100425

37. Gazzera, L.; Milani, R.; Pirrie, L.; Schmutz, M.; Blanck, C.; Resnati, G.; Metrangolo, P.; Krafft, M. P. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2016**, *55*, 10263–10267. doi:10.1002/anie.201603706

38. Yang, G.; O'Duill, M.; Gouverneur, V.; Krafft, M. P. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2015**, *54*, 8402–8406. doi:10.1002/anie.201502677

39. Justeau, C.; Vela-Gonzalez, A. V.; Jourdan, A.; Riess, J. G.; Krafft, M. P. *ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.* **2018**, *6*, 11450–11456. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01471

40. Gladysz, J. A.; Curran, D. P.; Horváth, I. T., Eds. *Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry*; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. doi:10.1002/3527603905

41. Luo, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Oderaotoshi, Y.; Curran, D. P. *Science* **2001**, *291*, 1766–1769. doi:10.1126/science.1057567

42. Dinh, L. V.; Gladysz, J. A. *Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.* **2005**, *44*, 4095–4097. doi:10.1002/anie.200500237

43. Jurak, M.; Chibowski, E. *Langmuir* **2007**, *23*, 10156–10163. doi:10.1021/la701220t

44. Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H. *Chem. Rev.* **2014**, *114*, 2432–2506. doi:10.1021/cr4002879

45. Krafft, M. P.; Riess, J. G. *Chem. Rev.* **2009**, *109*, 1714–1792. doi:10.1021/cr800260k

46. Krafft, M. P.; Riess, J. G. *Chemosphere* **2015**, *129*, 4–19. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.039
47. Nguyen, D.-V.; Hugoni, L.; Filippi, M.; Perton, F.; Shi, D.; Voirin, E.; Power, L.; Cotin, G.; Krafft, M. P.; Scherberich, A.; Lavalle, P.; Begin-Colin, S.; Felder-Flesch, D. *ChemPlusChem* **2019**. Submitted.

48. Rossi, S.; Waton, G.; Krafft, M. P. *Langmuir* **2010**, *26*, 1649–1655.
doi:10.1021/la9025987

49. Simonsen, A. C.; Bagatolli, L. A. *Langmuir* **2004**, *20*, 9720–9728.
doi:10.1021/la048683+

License and Terms

This is an Open Access article under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note
that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular
requires that the authors and source are credited.

The license is subject to the *Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology* terms and conditions:
([https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano](https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano))

The definitive version of this article is the electronic one
which can be found at:
doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.205