# Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries

Laura Galezowski, Nadir Recham, Dominique Larcher, Jennyfer Miot, Fériel Skouri-Panet, Hania Ahouari, François Guyot

► To cite this version:

Laura Galezowski, Nadir Recham, Dominique Larcher, Jennyfer Miot, Fériel Skouri-Panet, et al. Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. Microorganisms, 2023, 11 (3), pp.603. 10.3390/microorganisms11030603. hal-04052526

HAL Id: hal-04052526

https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-04052526

Submitted on 27 Jun 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Article

# Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries

Laura Galezowski <fnref n="1" />, Nadir Recham <fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />, Dominique Larcher <fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />, Jennyfer Miot <fnref n="1" />, Fériel Skouri-Panet <fnref n="1" />, Hania Ahouari <fnref n="4" />,<fnref n="5" /> and François Guyot <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="6" />,*

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Galezowski, L.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Miot, J.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Ahouari, H.; Guyot, F. Biologically Assisted One-Step Synthesis of Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. *Microorganisms* **2023**, *11*, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030603

Academic Editors: Ludovic Jourdin,
Catarina M. Paquete and
Igor Vassilev

Received: 20 January 2023
Revised: 15 February 2023
Accepted: 21 February 2023
Published: 27 February 2023

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).

**Abstract:** Mn(II)-oxidizing organisms promote the biomineralization of manganese oxides with specific textures, under ambient conditions. Controlling the phases formed and their texture on a larger scale may offer environmentally relevant routes to manganese oxide synthesis, with potential technological applications, for example, for energy storage. In the present study, we sought to use biofilms to promote the formation of electroactive minerals and to control the texture of these biominerals down to the electrode scale (i.e., cm scale). We used the bacterium *Pseudomonas putida* strain MnB1 which can produce manganese oxide in a biofilm. We characterized the biofilm-mineral assembly using a combination of electron microscopy, synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Under optimized conditions of biofilm growth on the surface of current collectors, mineralogical characterizations revealed the formation of several minerals including a slightly crystalline MnOx birnessite. Electrochemical measurements in a half-cell against Li(0) revealed the electrochemical signature of the Mn<fnref n="4" />⁺/Mn<fnref n="3" />⁺ redox couple indicating the electroactivity of the biomineralized biofilm without any post-synthesis chemical, physical or thermal treatment. These results provide a better understanding of the properties of biomineralized biofilms and their possible use in designing new routes for one-pot electrode synthesis.

**Keywords:** biomineralization; biofilms; electroactive biofilms; birnessite; manganese oxides; one-pot electrode synthesis

## 1. Introduction

Abundance, low toxicity, low cost and stability in the ambient atmosphere of MnO₂-
based oxides [1] make them particularly attractive as electrode materials for electrochemi-
cal systems, such as primary Zn/MnO₂ cells (Leclanché, alkaline cells, 1.5 volts) [2,3] or
Li/MnO₂ coin-cells (3 volts) [4–8]. Synthesis conditions strongly influence the texture, mor-
phology, particle size and degree of crystallinity of these Mn-oxides [9] with a determinant
impact on electrochemical performances. Controlling the structural and textural proper-
ties of such electrode materials for batteries is key to reaching optimal electrochemical
performances, but it is still challenging.

Birnessite, a phyllomanganate composed of layers of MnO₆ octahedra with ≈7 Å inter-
layer spacing, shows the insertion of cations within its interplanar spaces [10,11]. Various
methods have been developed to produce birnessite to be used as an electrode material,

<footnote n="1">¹ Institut de Minéralogie, Physique des Matériaux et Cosmochimie, Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS UMR, 7590, 75005 Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Laboratoire de Réactivité et Chimie des Solides, CNRS UMR 7314, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 33 Rue Saint Leu, CEDEX 1, 80039 Amiens, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l'Energie (RS2E), FR CNRS, 3459, 80039 Amiens, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Université de Lille, UMR CNRS 8516-LASIRE Laboratoire Avancé de Spectroscopie pour les Intéractions, la Réactivité et l'Environnement, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Université de Lille, FR 2638-IMEC-Institut Michel-Eugène Chevreul, 59000 Lille, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 75005 Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: francois.guyot@mnhn.fr</footnote>
including sol-gel reactions, calcinations and hydrothermal decomposition, e.g., [12–14], sometimes triggered by the use of strongly oxidizing conditions, and generally under acidic conditions. These methods, however, are most of the time non-environmentally friendly and involve multistep synthesis pathways [15]. To bypass these multi-step processes, it is important to develop a simpler birnessite synthesis pathway, to guarantee an optimized morphology and texture of the electrode.

Our goal is to propose an alternative way of electrode material production. To do this, our approach has comprised using microbial biomineralization to synthesize a Mn-oxide-based electrode. Microbial biomineralization proceeding under soft conditions, i.e., at ambient temperature and in aqueous media, offers a possible abatement of the energetic cost for making electrode materials, as already reported for Fe-phosphates [16], Fe-oxides [17], Co₃O₄ [18,19], MnOₓ/C [20], MnO₂ [21,22] and CuO [23].

In these systems, fungi, yeast and bacteria [24–26] promote the formation of mineral-organic assemblages, organized down to the nanometer scale (size range 1–100 nm) in a structure providing better electrochemical performances than their bulk counterparts formed under abiotic conditions. All of these previous studies have explored biomineralization in planktonic cultures, i.e., with bacterial cell suspensions in aqueous media, which have produced materials organized on the single-cell bacterial scale, i.e., submicrometer scale. These syntheses have required some post-processing after biomineralization such as heating and adding a polymer binder or conductive carbon to obtain good electrochemical performances. To go further, we want to propose a one-step synthesis method.

The main challenge of this study was to limit the post-synthesis processing steps and produce an electrode material directly on a collector. In order to do this, we proposed using one of the fundamental properties of bacteria, the biofilm. Biofilms are organized on a large scale and can colonize large areas (centimeters) [27]; we can therefore envisage colonizing a biofilm on a current collector and obtaining a texture on a centimeter scale. Biofilm-associated cells are different from their suspended counterparts by the generation of an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, reduced growth rates and the up-and down-regulation of specific genes [27]. Biomineralization can proceed within these biofilms, with the EPS acting as the preferential site for mineral nucleation and growth [28].

By analogy, biomineralization in microbial biofilms applied to electrode material synthesis could thus provide (1) an organic polymeric matrix acting as an analog of polymeric binders, (2) biominerals acting as electrochemically active matter and (3) a template acting as a current collector at the electrode (Figure 1).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** (a) Scheme of biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the support and (b) of the electrode material of a battery. Each component of the biofilm is analogous to a component of battery electrode material. Black carbon was not added to the biofilm.</figcaption></figure>

Manganese biomineralization results from Mn²⁺ oxidation to Mn³⁺ and/or Mn⁴⁺, and is often catalyzed by a microbial multicopper oxidase enzyme [29–32] in the presence of
di-oxygen or mediated by reactive oxygen species. Mn oxides formed by biomineralization are generally characterized by a nanometric size and a poorly crystallized structure. In planktonic conditions, the strain *Pseudomonas putida* produces birnessite, a layered manganese oxide [33–35]. This strain is also able to form a biofilm attached to stable surfaces and produce Mn oxide minerals [36,37]. The biosynthesis of manganese oxides constitutes a promising opportunity to be explored given controlling Mn-oxides’ structure and texture from the nano to the cm scale [38–40].

Here, as a proof of concept, we report a one-pot synthesis of birnessite-based electrodes without any post-processing above 80 °C. This was achieved using a carbon current collector colonized by a biomineralized biofilm of the *Pseudomonas putida* strain MnB1. Manganese oxides produced by the Mn-oxidizing bacteria acted as active matter of the electrode. We measured the kinetics of Mn²⁺ oxidation via *P. putida* in biofilm and determined the nature of the Mn-bearing biominerals formed. The composition of the electrode and the mineral’s structure and texture, as well as organic matter content, were determined using a combination of X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy, electron microscopies (SEM and TEM), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analyses coupled to mass spectrometry. Finally, we evaluated the electrochemical reactivity of these electrodes vs. lithium. Our results highlight the possibility of producing an electrochemically active electrode material of battery vs. lithium in a single step and at room temperature, which opens an alternative route for electrode material synthesis under environmentally relevant conditions.

## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Bacterial Culture and Production of Biomineralized Mn-Oxides in Biofilm

All solutions for culture media were sterilized via autoclaving at 121 °C. Biomineralized manganese oxides were produced in cultures of the *Pseudomonas putida* strain MnB1 (ATCC® 23483™). Bacteria were pre-cultured at 30 °C under aerobic conditions using an incubator system with horizontal stirring (120 rpm) overnight in a pH~6.8 growth medium composed of beef extract (3 g·L⁻¹), peptone (5 g·L⁻¹) and MnSO₄·H₂O (50 µM), after inoculation at 1/60 (v/v) from a stock culture stored at 4 °C. Then, cells were rinsed three times with a 10 mM HEPES solution with NaCl 10 mM (4000 × g, 10 min), and then transferred in the stationary phase into 75 mL of biomineralization medium at a cell density of 2.3 × 10⁸ cells/mL. The biomineralization medium (pH 7.40) was composed of HEPES (10 mM), (NH₄)₂SO₄ (2 mM), NaCl (0.7 mM) and glucose (1 mM). MnSO₄·H₂O (0.2 mM) was added daily. An autoclaved carbon current collector (gas diffusion layer (GDL—Freudenberg ref H23)) of 0.8 cm in diameter and a thickness of 207 µm, previously weighed, was deposited and left floating at the surface of the biomineralization medium, just before bacteria inoculation. We assumed that the biofilm formed at the medium-air interface close to the GDL current collector and the biofilm formed directly at the surface of the GDL current collector had the same characteristics and so it will be named biofilm-MnOₓ (Figure 2). The use of biofilm formed at the medium-air interface close to the GDL is justified by the need to have a powder without a current collector for some analyses. Biofilm-MnOₓ experiments were performed for one week in a dark room, to avoid possible reactions with reactive oxygen species [41], at room temperature and without agitation to promote a uniform biofilm formation. Abiotic controls were prepared in the same way but without bacteria inoculation. Experiments were repeated at least ten times.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Formation of brown biofilm at the surface of the medium and biofilm colonization on the black current collector after daily additions of Mn²⁺ in the medium.</figcaption></figure>

## 2.2. Kinetics of Manganese Oxide Precipitation with *P. putida*

The analyses were performed in triplicate. Manganese concentrations were measured daily via inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Cetac ASX-520). The solution was filtered using a 0.22 µm filtration and acidified with HNO₃ 2% (Suprapur, Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA). Analyses were based on the determination of Mn remaining in the solution in the medium culture.

## 2.3. Sample Preparation for Biofilm Analyses

Biofilm-MnOₓ was collected via centrifugation (4000× g, 10 min) and rinsed 3 times with water. Colonized GDLs were collected and immersed 3 times in water for 10 min. Samples were further dried under air at 80 °C for two hours. Accordingly with characterization results, we suppose that the specific organization of the biominaler is not significantly affected below 80 °C and that all water loss in this temperature range concerns surface water only.

## 2.4. Abiotic Reference Compounds

Mn-bearing minerals were used as reference compounds for X-ray absorption, electron paramagnetic resonance and electrochemical studies. H₀.₅MnO₂ and HMnPO₄·3H₂O were prepared via precipitation in aqueous solution. HMnPO₄·3H₂O was synthesized from MnSO₄ 1.275 g and KH₂PO₄ 1 g in 15 mL water; the solution was transferred into an autoclave (Parr® 23 mL). Thereafter, the solution was heated overnight at 160 °C. Manganese oxide (H₀.₅MnO₂) was prepared following the modified method from Villalobos et al. [33]:

* 1 g KMnO₄ in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (1));

* 2.4 g MnCl₂·4H₂O in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (2));

* 0.7 g NaOH in 100 mL MQ water (Solution (3)).

Solution (1) was added slowly to Solution (3) during stirring. Solution (2) was then added to the previous mixture and maintained during stirring overnight. The resulting precipitate was washed 3 times with 50 mL water. All powders were then washed twice with 50 mL water and once with acetone and finally dried in air at 80 °C. MnSO₄·H₂O, Mn₂O₃ and δ-MnO₂ are commercial compounds purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

## 2.5. Biomineral Characterization

The mass of biofilm formed at the surface of the current collectors was measured by weighing the collector before and after colonization with a microbalance with an accuracy
of up to a tenth of a microgram (XP2U Ultra Micro Balance Mettler Toledo®, Greifensee, Swiss). The average mass of biofilm on the support was 0.675 mg.

Proportions of mineral and organic matter in biofilm-MnOₓ were measured via thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) using an STA449C coupled to a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS 403 Aeolos) under dry air flow (50 mL·min⁻¹) with a ramp of 5 °C·min⁻¹, up to 900 °C. These analyses were coupled with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

Biofilm-MnOₓ was characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed in capillaries with a Rigaku MM007HF X-ray diffractometer using a rotating molybdenum anode and a RAXIS4++ imaging plate detector. The background was removed using the software Match!

In addition, bulk Mn speciation was determined via quick X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) at the Mn K-edge (6539–6580 eV) at the ROCK beamline (SOLEIL synchrotron, Saint-Aubin, France). Samples were analyzed at ambient temperature in transmission mode using a Si(111) double-crystal monochromator. Spectra were calibrated by setting the first inflection point of a Mn foil to 6539 eV recorded in double transmission. XAS spectra were merged and normalized and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data were extracted using the Athena software [42]. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and *k*³-weighted EXAFS data were analyzed using the linear combination fit (LCF) procedure in Athena and a custom-built software based on the Levenberg–Marquardt minimization algorithm, respectively, as described in [43,44].

The textures of the biofilm-MnOₓ were investigated using a field emission gun (FEG) and ZEISS Ultra 55 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Zeiss, Marly-le-Roi, France), equipped with an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) probe (Bruker). Samples were imaged in back-scattered electron mode at 15 kV (working distance of 7.5 mm) and in secondary electron mode at 3 kV (working distance of 3 mm).

In addition, biofilm-MnOₓ was analyzed using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) in high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) mode, via high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and XEDS, using a JEOL2100F FEG-TEM (JEOL, France) operating at 200 kV. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were obtained in the areas of interest and used to characterize crystalline mineral phases.

EPR spectroscopy (electron paramagnetic resonance) was used to check the presence of paramagnetic species in the samples. Continuous wave (CW) measurements were performed with an X-band Bruker Elexsys E580 spectrometer operating at 9.6 GHz at room temperature, with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, modulation amplitude of 2 gauss and 2 mW (for powders) or 10 mW (for solutions) of microwave power. Before EPR analyses, powder samples (H₀.₅MnO₂, planktonic-MnO₂ [22] and biofilm-MnOₓ) were filled into 3 mm quartz tubes, whereas 2 mm quartz tubes were used to analyze the liquid samples.

## 2.6. Electrochemical Characterizations in Li Half-Cells

Electrochemical analyses were conducted in laboratory Swagelok-type cells. The active material (AM) used as a positive electrode consisted of biominerals formed within the biofilm nominally assigned to the MnOₓ composition. The proportion of minerals obtained via the deduction of the mineral part using TGA was used to calculate the mass of active material (AM) in the electrode. Biofilm-MnOₓ was provided directly from the positive electrodes, without carbon addition. The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox using biofilm-MnOₓ as the positive electrode separated from the negative electrode (lithium disk) by 2 sheets of glass fiber disks (Whatman GF/D borosilicate), with the whole setup being soaked in an LP30 electrolyte (LiPF₆; 1 M) solution of ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) mixture (1/1 *w*/*w*). Galvanostatic cycling tests were conducted at room temperature between 2 V and 3.9 V potential at the rate of C/20 (1 electron exchanged per 20 h) or C/50 (1 electron exchanged per 50 h) using a MacPile controller (Claix, France). Specific capacities are reported in mAh per gram of AM (MnOₓ). H₀.₅MnO₂ was also tested in the Li half-cell. Experiments were repeated at least three times. The proportion of the biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the current collector was low
compared to the amount of amorphous material (current collector) and prevented us from being able to analyze the material obtained after the electrochemical cycle.

## 3. Results

### 3.1. Production of the Electrode: Biomineralized Biofilm Formed by *Pseudomonas putida*

*Pseudomonas putida* MnB1 has been reported to produce manganese oxide particles, mainly under planktonic conditions [33,36,45]. Its ability to form biofilms has otherwise been described in several publications [46–48]. However, in previous manganese oxide production studies, the medium was stirred, making the production of biofilms on a large scale impossible. In our study, we used this bacterial strain to form a biomineralized biofilm at the surface of a current collector in suitable conditions to produce electrochemically active manganese oxide.

The synthesis consisted of the incubation of *P. putida* MnB1 in a mineralization medium (Table 1), with a carbon current collector (GDL) placed at the surface of the medium. Without medium agitation, a biofilm developed after 10 h of incubation at the interface between the liquid medium and air as an orange-yellow slime. With daily additions of Mn²⁺, the color of the biofilm turned to a brown tint after 10 h, highlighting manganese oxide precipitation and forming the material Biofilm-MnOₓ (Figure 2). No precipitation could be observed by the naked eye in the abiotic control in the timeframe of the experiment (2 weeks). Such an air-liquid interfacial biofilm had not been previously described for the strain *Pseudomonas putida* MnB1 but is quite common among bacteria and could be impacted by modifications of pH, the viscosity of the medium and surface tension [49]. The precipitation yields of manganese ranged between 50% and 80% of the total Mn²⁺ added (Figure 3). Chemical analyses indicated that between 1200 µM and 1500 µM out of the total added Mn²⁺ (1900 µM over two weeks) had been precipitated by the end of the experiment (Figure 3). The precipitation of manganese-bearing solids occurred only within the biofilm, and more specifically in the uppermost parts in contact with di-oxygen. Experimentations with medium agitation reported a more efficient Mn precipitation than in this non-agitated biofilm-forming configuration [22,46], probably because Mn-oxidation catalyzed by a multicopper oxidase is dependent on the supply of di-oxygen [31]. The lesser efficiency of Mn²⁺ oxidation in a biofilm compared to planktonic conditions [22,46] is thus likely related to less efficient contact between Mn²⁺ and di-oxygen because of the absence of agitation which is nevertheless necessary to optimize biofilm formation.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Composition of the rich and mineralization media used for bacterial cultures.</caption><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Rich Medium</th><th colspan="2">Mineralization Medium</th></tr><tr><th>Composition</th><th>Concentration</th><th>Composition</th><th>Concentration</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Beef extract</td><td>3 g/L</td><td>HEPES</td><td>10 mM</td></tr><tr><td>Peptone</td><td>5 g/L</td><td>(NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td><td>2 mM</td></tr><tr><td>MnSO<sub>4</sub>·H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>50 µM</td><td>NaCl</td><td>0.7 mM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Glucose</td><td>1 mM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>MnSO<sub>4</sub>·H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td>0.2 mM</td></tr></tbody></table>

In summary, we can cultivate *Pseudomonas putida* MnB1 without the agitation of the medium to form a biofilm at the interface between the liquid medium and air. The addition of Mn²⁺ into the medium during the process of biomineralization impacted the color of the biofilm and translated Mn²⁺ oxidation into the biofilm. The addition of support (current collector) at the surface of the medium did not prevent the process of biofilm formation.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Evolution of the concentration of Mn precipitated as a solid in Biofilm-MnOₓ (blue squares, indigo triangles and green circles correspond to three replicates in three independent cultures). Total cumulative added Mn²⁺ concentration (bars) increases with time following daily additions of Mn²⁺. Abiotic control (black square) does not show any significant Mn precipitation even after 13 days. In comparison, planktonic control (red triangle) indicates a Mn precipitation rate between 95 and 99% all over the experiment [22].</figcaption></figure>

3.2. *Characterization of the Electrode Biofilm-MnOx*

Mn-bearing solids produced in Biofilm-MnOₓ were analyzed using X-ray diffrac-
tion (Figure 4). Collected diffractograms display a peak at 7.4 Å, characteristic of bir-
nessite (JCPDS #00-018-0802 [33,34]). In addition, β-Mn<sup>III</sup>OOH, a Mn(III) oxyhydroxide
(feitknechtite), was detected in the diffractograms by a shoulder at 4.6 Å [50] (Figure 4).
The most plausible way to explain the presence of feitknechtite (β-Mn<sup>III</sup>OOH) is an abiotic
reaction between MnO<sub>x</sub> birnessite and the residual Mn<sup>2+</sup> not oxidized by the bacteria [11].
This observation confirms that Mn oxides are highly reactive [51].

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** XRD analysis of the biogenic mineral of Biofilm-MnOₓ. Indexations correspond to birnessite except for the peak at 4.6 Å corresponding to β-MnOOH.</figcaption></figure>
XANES spectra at the Mn K-edge were best fit by a linear combination of Mn⁴⁺ (52% ± 3%; reference d-MnO₂), Mn³⁺ (20% ± 4%, reference Mn₂O₃) and two contributions of Mn²⁺, corresponding to two distinct references HMnPO₄·3H₂O (10% ± 9%) and MnSO₄ (18% ± 7%) (Figure 5). The addition of two phases of Mn²⁺ improves the fit. XANES spectra results are consistent with XRD data, which showed the detection of MnO₂, feitknechtite and HMnPO₄ phases.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Linear combination fitting (LCF) of Mn K-edge spectra of Biofilm-MnOₓ. XANES spectra at the Mn K-edge compared with the best fits corresponding to a linear combination of 52% ± 3% δ-MnO₂, 20% ± 4% Mn³⁺, 18% ± 7% Mn²⁺ and 10% ± 9% HMnPO₄·3H₂O. The black solid line shows the data and the red dashed line is the best fit of the XANES data.</figcaption></figure>

Thermal analyses (TGA/DTG) of Biofilm-MnOₓ were performed to determine the proportions of organic matter (bacterial cells + EPS) and minerals in the electrode material. The thermograms show three distinct phenomena, taking place upon heating under air (Figure 6a,b). The two weight losses in the temperature range of 20–200 °C denote the release of H₂O coordinated to the interlayer cations, mineral water structure and surface humidity as described by [52]. The amount of water in the biomineralized biofilm measured via TGA was ~10%. The subsequent massive release of water and CO₂ (~30%) at higher temperatures (ca 200–300 °C) matches the combustion of bacterial organic matter as previously reported in [16]. XRD analysis (data not shown here) indicated that the material collected after TGA was composed of Mn₂O₃ bixbyite (JCPDS #96-900-7521). The weight loss at around 550 °C could thus correspond to a reduction in the initial material (Mn⁴⁺) into Mn₂O₃ (Mn³⁺). The absence of any XRD-identified manganese phosphate does not rule out the presence of Mn-phosphate in this material as observed by XANES (Figure 5) but is indicative of its poor crystallinity.

The total weight obtained after TGA has been used in the calculation of the mineral/organics proportion. Taking into account the mass loss associated with the mineral during TGA, the mineral part in the biofilm (corresponding to a large part of MnOₓ but also including β-MnOOH and HMnPO₄·3H₂O) was ~57 wt% (from a total weight loss of ~43 wt%). This estimation will be used to calculate the percentage of active material (AM) in the electrode. In a first approximation, it was considered that AM has a MnO₂ stoichiometry. It was then checked a posteriori that taking into account other phases present in the material (see results below) had no significant effect on the calculated proportions.

The current collector (GDL), which constitutes the substrate of the biofilm, was composed of an 8-µm diameter carbon fiber network (Figure 7a). After incubation in a mineralization medium with bacteria, we observed the colonization of the surface of the current collector by the biofilm, further confirmed by SEM observations (Figure 7b).
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Differential thermogravimetric curves (DTG) (a) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGAs) (b) of Biofilm-MnOₓ.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** SEM image (secondary electron detector) of carbon current collector before (a) and after (b–d) incubation in biomineralization medium with bacteria (corresponding to Biofilm-MnOₓ). Bacteria in the biofilm (double arrow) are visible (insert in (c)) on fibers of the current collector (dotted arrow), mostly at the surface of the current collector; carbon fibers deeper in the current collector are not colonized by the biofilm (dotted arrow). The biomineral formed in the biofilm is close to bacteria cells (solid arrow) (c,d). Biominerals are porous and textured (d).</figcaption></figure>
Carbon fibers of the current collector were still visible after colonization by the biofilm; bacteria were able to colonize fibers mostly at the surface of the current collector (Figure 7c). Mn oxides were localized in patchy zones of biofilm close to bacteria cells (Figure 7c,d). Aside from dominant carbon (composing the GDL substrate), the biofilm material contained phosphorus, manganese, nitrogen and sulfur (Figure 8b). Mn and P were detected as colocalized by EDX at some places in the biofilm (Figure 8a), whereas Mn-rich zones devoid of P were detected at a distance from the cells (Figure 8c). Manganese oxide agglomerates were porous and consisted of micrometer-sized polydisperse aggregates of nanoparticles (Figure 7d). The formation of a patchy mineral on the biofilm might be related to a heterogeneous distribution of bacteria in the biofilm. Regions hosting more abundant bacteria may have served as preferential Mn-oxidation sites, with EPS locally acting as nucleation points of the mineral.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** SEM-XEDS analysis of Biofilm-MnOₓ: SEM-EDX cartography with elemental maps of Mn, P and C (b) and XEDS spectrum of analyzed zones (black spares) correspond with biofilm (a) and biominerals (c).</figcaption></figure>

To obtain more precise insights into the structure of Biofilm-MnOₓ down to the nanometer scale, we carried out TEM observations. As shown in Figure 7, the birnessite phase was extracellular (Figure 9a,c,e) and the SAED patterns (Figure 9a insert) confirmed its MnOₓ—birnessite structure. Organic matter, most probably the EPS, is co-localized with MnOₓ birnessite (Figure 9a). Co-localizations of Mn and P were identified near organic matter or cells (Figure 9c,d) and could correspond to Mn and P adsorbed at the surface of the organic matter or to a Mn(II)-phosphate phase as shown by SEM (Figure 8a) and XAS (Figure 5). In addition, the hydrolysis of polyphosphate granules such as those observed in some cells (Figure 9c) could provide a source of inorganic phosphate that may react with Mn²⁺ sorbed at the cell surface, leading to manganese phosphate precipitation near cells [36]. Mn²⁺ may thus be adsorbed at the edges or incorporated within the structure of birnessite [53,54]. As suggested by XAS (Figure 5), two types of Mn²⁺ are present, one in the form of Mn(II)-phosphate and another absorbed at the surface or in the structure of MnOₓ.

To confirm the presence of Mn²⁺, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a very useful tool used for the detection of paramagnetic species such as Mn²⁺ or Mn⁴⁺. The EPR spectrum of Biofilm-MnOₓ (black curve, Figure 10) consists of one broad peak with 522 G linewidth centered on g ≈ 1.997, on which a well-defined sextuplet is superimposed, indicating that the presence of Mn²⁺ ions in distorted octahedral coordination [55] resulted from hyperfine interactions between electron spin (S = 5/2) and nucleus spin (I = 5/2) [55] (Figure 10). Based on the g value and the narrow linewidth, the EPR signal was assigned to Mn⁴⁺ (S = 3/2) paramagnetic species which corroborates the findings reported in the literature by Kim et al. on the MnO₂ biogenic oxide obtained with different bacteria (*Bacillus* spore, SG-1; *Pseudomonas*, GB-1, etc.) [56]. The same features (Mn⁴⁺ signal) had also been mentioned in the literature in layered Li[Mg�0.5-xNiₓMn0.5]O₂ oxides [57], in spinels (Li₁+xMn₂-xO₄ with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1 [58], Li₄Mn₅O₁₂ [59]) and in MnO₂ powder [60]. Associated with Mn⁴⁺, the Mn²⁺ sextuplet has also been previously observed in the literature. For
example, Kakazey et al. attributed such a sextuplet in MnO₂ to the presence of traces of the salt initially used for the synthesis associated with the high content of physically adsorbed water at the surface of MnO₂ particles and in the pores of their aggregates [60]. Another explanation could be provided by the presence of structural Mn²⁺ in the sample as already reported by Najafour et al. [61].

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** TEM analysis of Biofilm-MnOₓ (a) showing bacteria (solid arrow) and extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow). Electron diffraction in the TEM (inset in (a)) is consistent with birnessite. STEM image showing extracellular biominerals (dotted arrow) (b) and STEM-XEDS composite elemental map of Mn, C and P with bacteria (solid arrow) (c). XEDS spectrum of one bacterium (d) and biominerals (e).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Room temperature EPR spectrum; inset: pseudomodulation of biofilm-MnOₓ (black), planktonic-MnO₂ (red) and H₀.₅MnO₂ (blue). Experimental conditions: power: 2 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.</figcaption></figure>

The presence of Mn²⁺ in Biofilm-MnOₓ could also be assigned to Mn²⁺ precipitated as manganese phosphate, Mn²⁺ adsorbed on the material's surface or Mn²⁺ in the interlayers of birnessite to compensate for negative layer charges [10,62].
The EPR spectrum of the planktonic-MnO₂ (red curve, Figure 10) displays a broad peak assigned to Mn⁴⁺ overlapped by a less pronounced sextuplet, indicating the presence of Mn²⁺ as confirmed by the pseudomodulation curve (inset, Figure 10). The Mn²⁺ detected with the planktonic-MnO₂ could be attributed to a precipitated HMnPO₄ as already shown by Galezowski et al. [22]; this amount of Mn²⁺ is very low compared to that observed with MnOₓ biofilm.

In the case of the abiotic H₀.₅MnO₂, a very broad signal was obtained (blue curve, Figure 10) attributed to Mn⁴⁺ without any traces of Mn²⁺ as confirmed by the pseudomodulation EPR curve (inset, Figure 10, red curve). A very broad EPR signal had been obtained by Kim et al., with different synthetic MnO₂ with a linewidth comprised between 1000 gauss and 2600 gauss [56].

In summary, the material produced (Biofilm-MnOₓ) through one-pot synthesis via the biofilm colonization of a GDL current collector and subsequent biomineralization was found to be a composite material. The biofilm and the biomineral, making up this composite material, are intimately engulfed and fixed at the surface of the current collector thanks to the exceptional adhesion capacity of biofilms [63]. It contains MnOₓ birnessite, β-Mn(III)OOH, Mn(II)-phosphate and Mn²⁺ absorbed at the surface of MnOₓ birnessite or located in the structure. β-Mn(III)OOH and Mn(II)-phosphate have no electrochemical activity and constitute dead masses in this range of potential (1.9 V to 4 V) [64,65]. As well as an equivalent amount of organic material derived from the cells, EPSs were also detected via TEM analyses, thus making this material a typical organic/inorganic hybrid composite.

### 3.3. Electrochemical Analysis of Biofilm-MnOₓ

MnO₂ birnessite commonly studied as an electrode material of Li-ion batteries provides capacities more or less close to the theoretical capacity (308 mAh·g⁻¹) depending on the size and the morphology of the particles and the cycling conditions [6,66,67]. Significant research has been devoted to the synthesis of MnO₂ nanotubes and the development of methods to produce MnO₂ with a controlled morphology is in demand [68].

The electrochemical performances of our bio-assisted electrode (Biofilm-MnOₓ) were evaluated vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ in the conditions listed previously. The potential versus composition profile for a biofilm-MnOₓ electrode cell is shown in Figure 11a. It reveals electrochemical activity at about ~3 volts vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ in agreement with an active Mn⁴⁺/Mn³⁺ redox couple [22,69] with a reversible capacity comprised between 130 and 160 mAh·g⁻¹ at a C/20 rate (Figure 11a). This capacity corresponds to ~50% of the theoretical capacity of MnO₂.

During the first discharge, the capacity corresponded to 80 mAh·g⁻¹ at a C/20 rate (Figure 11a) and after the first charge the measured capacity corresponded to 130 mAh·g⁻¹, which indicates an extra charging capacity of about 50 mAh·g⁻¹. During the second discharge, a capacity near 105 mAh/g was recorded which indicates that the major part of the extra capacity observed in the first charge was reversible. Galvanostatic cycling had been performed in the charge (data not shown here) and the results showed the same extra capacity phenomenon. This reversible extra capacity can be explained if it is attributed to the extraction of a mobile charge-carrying cation that was already in the structure.

Given the mineralized medium solution, mobile extra cations in such structures could be Na⁺ or K⁺, but EDX analyses of biofilm-MnOₓ showed near-zero cation/Mn ratios (Figure 7c). This could then suggest that H⁺ or Mn²⁺ cations could be present in this biogenic birnessite.

To obtain further insight into this extra capacity observed during electrochemical cycling, galvanostatic tests of an abiotic H₀.₅MnO₂ [33] were performed. As displayed in Figure 11e, the electrochemical test vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ revealed electrochemical activity at about ~3 volts vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ and a reversible capacity of 160 mAh·g⁻¹ at a C/20 rate. No extra capacity had been observed upon cycling of this abiotic control and this finding could be explained by the absence of mobile H⁺ in the structure.
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 11.** Electrochemical cycling of (a) biofilm-MnOₓ, (c) planktonic-MnO₂ and (e) abiotic H₀.₅MnO₂ vs. Li°. Planktonic-MnO₂ and abiotic H₀.₅MnO₂ were tested with the addition of black carbon. Galvanostatic cycling curves were obtained at C/20 (1 Li exchanged in 20 h) starting at discharge. Capacity retention was in charge of (b) biofilm-MnOₓ and (d) planktonic-MnO₂ at C/20 (1 Li in 20 h) for the first twenty cycles.</figcaption></figure>

The absence of protons' mobility in the structure of MnO₂ supports our hypothesis that Mn²⁺ present in MnOₓ could be removed during the first charge, explaining the extra capacity.

In comparison, the biogenic manganese oxide (planktonic-MnO₂) obtained with the bacteria *Pseudomonas putida* strain MnB1 in planktonic conditions, i.e., agitated suspension of bacteria and tested in battery vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ in a previous study [22], is shown (Figure 11c). The organic–inorganic composite material showed good electrochemical performances with high power and 300 mAh·g⁻¹ of capacity (Figure 11c) and no extra capacity. EPR analysis of this biogenic manganese oxide (red curve, Figure 10) presented only a small amount of Mn²⁺ corresponding to HMn(II)PO₄, which is a dead mass. This result indicated a low
amount of Mn²⁺ in planktonic conditions as also detected by EPR analysis and confirmed the absence of Mn²⁺ associated with the manganese oxides. Moreover, in agreement with this result, galvanostatic tests indicated the absence of extra capacity under planktonic conditions and can thus lead one to conclude on the relationship between the presence of a large amount of Mn²⁺ associated with MnOₓ in the biofilm and the presence of extra capacity. We hypothesize that Mn²⁺ cations are present in the structure of biofilm-MnOₓ as detected using EPR spectroscopy (black curve, Figure 10) and XAS analysis (Figure 5) and were removed during the first charge, which could lead to the observed extra capacity. In the case of birnessite with hexagonal layer symmetry, Mn²⁺ or Mn³⁺ have indeed been described with vacancies in manganese-oxygen layers [10,53].

Moreover, this biofilm-MnOₓ electrode presented a rapid loss of capacity after a few cycles (Figure 11b). In fact, after the fourth cycle, the capacity of the electrode was equal to half of the starting capacity, which reflects low cyclability.

In comparison, the planktonic-MnO₂ material presented good cyclability even after 20 cycles (Figure 11d). We note that an absence of extra capacity and good cyclability of the electrode for this condition might be correlated. Thus, the loss of cyclability observed with the biofilm-MnOₓ electrode could be due to the extraction of Mn²⁺ accompanied by a loss in structure of the active matter. This extracted Mn²⁺ could have been transferred to the negative electrode (lithium disk) and led to the positive electrode's degradation.

To verify this hypothesis, an EPR spectrum of the negative electrode (lithium disk) after cycling was collected to detect possible Mn²⁺ traces. For this purpose, electrochemical cycling was conducted with the biofilm-MnOₓ as the positive electrode and the lithium disk as the negative electrode; after one cycle, the lithium disk was recovered, rinsed two times in DMC (dimethyl carbonate) and then incubated in water. The resulting solution was then analyzed via EPR spectroscopy using a 2 mm quartz tube. The obtained EPR spectrum (Figure 12) exhibited a sextet of lines due to the presence of Mn²⁺ in the solution, which could confirm the hypothesis of Mn²⁺ transfer from the cathode to the anode side. This phenomenon could be responsible for electrode modification during the electrochemical tests, resulting in a loss of cyclability when the biofilm-MnOₓ was used as the positive electrode (Figure 11b). This feature could also be related to a degradation of the positive electrode in the biofilm case due to structural modifications induced by the extraction of Mn²⁺ during the first charge.

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 12.** CW EPR spectrum together with pseudomodulation of Li-disk-water solution obtained after one cycle. Experimental conditions: power: 10 mW; amplitude modulation: 2 gauss.</figcaption></figure>
In summary, we can produce an electrode material for batteries with a biogenic
manganese oxide formed in biomineralized biofilm at the surface of the current collector
(biofilm-MnOₓ). In the literature, all of these studies require post-synthesis processing
to obtain an electrode material. For example, Miot et al. [17] provide the production of
α-Fe₂O₃ via biomineralization for use as a conversion-based electrode material in lithium
batteries. Shim et al. [18] propose the production of porous Co₃O₄ that exhibits excellent
electrochemical performance in Li-ion batteries. Our method can produce an electrode
material in a single synthesis. Electrochemical analyses have confirmed the presence of
labile cations resulting in extra capacity during the charge. This presence of labile cations
prevents our material from maintaining a good charge after several cycles.

**4. Conclusions**

The production of an electrode material for Li-ions batteries in a one-step process was achieved through biofilm biomineralization promoted by *Pseudomonas putida* using a GDL carbon current collector. The use of biomineralization in biofilm was interesting for two main reasons: (1) *P. putida*'s ability to produce active matter in a polymeric binder network (the extra-cellular polymeric substances (EPSs) produced by the cells) and (2) the possibility to provide a useful birnessite texture on the electrode scale.

The characterization of this electrode material revealed a complex composite material composed, almost equally, of both organic matter (bacteria cells and the EPS) and biogenic minerals (MnOₓ, β-MnOOH and HMnPO₄·3H₂O). Biogenic minerals, consisting of phyllomanganate birnessite, were highly textured and embedded in the matrix of biofilm, whereas Mn(II)-phosphates were formed in contact with cells and organic matter. Further EPR analyses were performed to obtain more information about the nature and behavior of Mn²⁺ cations present in the structure and indicated the presence of Mn²⁺ related to the electroactive mineral. This electrode material presented electrochemical activity vs. Li⁺/Li⁰ without any post-synthesis treatment.

Electrochemical tests of this biomineralized biofilm electrode (biofilm-MnOₓ) confirmed the presence of labile cations resulting in extra capacity during the charge. The absence of the extra capacity of both planktonic-MnO₂ and abiotic H₀.₅MnO₂ is, according to EPR analysis, related to the absence or low amount of Mn²⁺ in these special electrodes contrary to those of biofilm-MnOₓ, leading one to think that the extra capacity was due to Mn²⁺ in the structure of biofilm-MnOₓ. This extraction of Mn²⁺ could lead to a modification in mineral structure and a modification in the positive electrode, leading to a rapid loss of capacity during the cycles and making the electrode unstable in the battery.

The presence of Mn²⁺ associated with MnOₓ could be due to a diminution of enzymatic oxidation because of the absence of agitation in the medium. The Mn²⁺ in the medium could be absorbed and intercalated between layers of lamellar manganese oxides [10]. In addition, we evidenced the impact of the absence of agitation in the medium during the formation of the biofilm. Biomineralization under less oxygenated conditions led to the formation of Mn³⁺-containing phases, which are dead material and negatively impact electrochemical performance. This phase results from the competition between the enzymatic oxidation of Mn²⁺ into MnO₂ and abiotic reactions between soluble Mn²⁺ and already-formed MnO₂.

Our method, using a one-pot production at room temperature with a biofilm, leads to
improved electrochemical performances of a birnessite-based electrode. In future work,
the challenge would be to optimize the MnO₂/organic proportions and Mn²⁺ biological
oxidation efficiency in order to decrease Mn²⁺ remnants in the final material so as to
obtain a more efficient electrode material without the presence of extra capacity. The
possibility to obtain an optimized texture of the electrode material without extra capacity
could further ensure a better exchange with lithium ions. One solution to optimize the
performance of this material could be to use voltage polarization of the current collector
during biofilm formation. Polarization can have a favorable effect on the colonization of
the biofilm with a supportive or a repulsive effect depending on the bacterial strain, the
hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature of the support or the different ionic forces at play in
the culture medium [70,71]. The possibility of optimizing the colonization of biofilm on the current collector with an improved part of active matter could be an efficient way of producing manganese oxide. The facility to obtain microscale-textured manganese oxides directly on the current collector could pave the way for the more rational production of electrode materials.

**Author Contributions:** J.M., F.G., D.L., N.R. and L.G. conceived and planned the experiments. L.G., N.R., F.G. and H.A. performed the experiments. F.S.-P. helped with microbiology experiments using the IMPMC Biology Platform (GEMME). J.M., F.G., N.R., H.A. and L.G. performed the sample analyses. N.R., F.G., D.L., J.M., H.A. and L.G. contributed to the interpretation of the results. L.G. wrote the manuscript with critical feedback from all of the authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This work was funded by the ANR SRB project, grant ANR-14-CE33-0003-01, of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche, to JM. Parts of this work were supported by IPGP multidisciplinary program PARI, and by Paris—IdF region SESAME—grant N° 12015908. The SEM facility at the IMPMC is funded by Région Ile de France, grant SESAME 2006 N°I-07-593/R, INSU/CNRS, UPMC-Paris 6 and by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant N° ANR-07-BLAN-0124-01). The TEM facility at IMPMC is supported by Région Ile de France, grant SESAME 2000 E 1435.

**Data Availability Statement:** All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

**Acknowledgments:** We thank Laure Cordier for running the ICP-AES experiments. We would like to thank the staff of the IMPMC (Sorbonne Université) for support and training with regard to the instruments, Benoît Baptiste and Ludovic Delbès for the XRD facility, Jean-Michel Guigner for the TEM facility and Imène Estève, Béatrice Doisneau and Stéphanie Delbrel for the SEM facility. We thank Antonella Iadecola (CNRS—RS2E) for running experiments at the ROCK beamline. We thank Hervé Vezin (LASIRE—Lille) for faithful discussions surrounding EPR spectroscopy results. Finally, we thank Mathieu Courty (CNRS—RS2E) for the thermogravimetric analysis. We thank Daphné Boursier (Laboratoire de réactivité et chimie des solides) for the proofreading and correction of English.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Post, J.E. Manganese Oxide Minerals: Crystal Structures and Economic and Environmental Significance. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1999**, *96*, 3447–3454. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Jennings, C.W.; Vosburgh, W.C. A Proposed Mechanism for Self-Discharge of the Leclanché Cell. *J. Electrochem. Soc.* **1952**, *99*, 309. [CrossRef]

3. Ghosh, S.; Brenet, J.P. Study of the Mechanism of Cathodic Reduction of Gamma Manganese Dioxide in the Leclanche Cell System. *Electrochim. Acta* **1962**, *7*, 449–455. [CrossRef]

4. Thackeray, M.M.; Rossouw, M.H.; de Kock, A.; de la Harpe, A.P.; Gummow, R.J.; Pearce, K.; Liles, D.C. The Versatility of MnO₂ for Lithium Battery Applications. *J. Power Sources* **1993**, *43*, 289–300. [CrossRef]

5. Kim, H.; Popov, B.N. Synthesis and Characterization of MnO₂-Based Mixed Oxides as Supercapacitors. *J. Electrochem. Soc.* **2003**, *150*, D56–D62. [CrossRef]

6. Brousse, T.; Toupin, M.; Dugas, R.; Athouël, L.; Crosnier, O.; Bélanger, D. Crystalline MnO₂ as Possible Alternatives to Amorphous Compounds in Electrochemical Supercapacitors. *J. Electrochem. Soc.* **2006**, *153*, A2171–A2180. [CrossRef]

7. Alfaruqi, M.H.; Mathew, V.; Gim, J.; Kim, S.; Song, J.; Baboo, J.P.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, J. Electrochemically Induced Structural Transformation in a γ-MnO₂ Cathode of a High Capacity Zinc-Ion Battery System. *Chem. Mater.* **2015**, *27*, 3609–3620. [CrossRef]

8. Qiu, N.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y. Low-Cost Birnessite as a Promising Cathode for High-Performance Aqueous Rechargeable Batteries. *Electrochim. Acta* **2018**, *272*, 154–160. [CrossRef]

9. Marafatto, F.F.; Lanson, B.; Peña, J. Crystal Growth and Aggregation in Suspensions of δ-MnO₂ Nanoparticles: Implications for Surface Reactivity. *Environ. Sci. Nano* **2017**, *5*, 497–508. [CrossRef]

10. Lanson, B.; Drits, V.A.; Silvester, E.; Manceau, A. Structure of H-Exchanged Hexagonal Birnessite and Its Mechanism of Formation from Na-Rich Monoclinic Buserite at Low PH. *Am. Mineral.* **2000**, *85*, 826–838. [CrossRef]

11. Bargar, J.R.; Tebo, B.M.; Bergmann, U.; Webb, S.M.; Glatzel, P.; Chiu, V.Q.; Villalobos, M. Biotic and Abiotic Products of Mn(II) Oxidation by Spores of the Marine Bacillus Sp. Strain SG-1. *Am. Mineral.* **2005**, *90*, 143–154. [CrossRef]

12. Chen, R.; Zavalij, P.; Whittingham, M.S. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of KxMnO₂·yH₂O. *Chem. Mater.* **1996**, *8*, 1275–1280. [CrossRef]
13. Chen, R.; Chirayil, T.; Zavalij, P.; Whittingham, M.S. The Hydrothermal Synthesis of Sodium Manganese Oxide and a Lithium Vanadium Oxide. *Solid State Ion.* **1996**, *86–88*, 1–7. [CrossRef]

14. Komaba, S.; Kumagai, N.; Chiba, S. Synthesis of Layered MnO₂ by Calcination of KMnO4 for Rechargeable Lithium Battery Cathode. *Electrochim. Acta* **2000**, *46*, 31–37. [CrossRef]

15. Zhu, J.; Shi, W.; Xiao, N.; Rui, X.; Tan, H.; Lu, X.; Hng, H.H.; Ma, J.; Yan, Q. Oxidation-Etching Preparation of MnO₂ Tubular Nanostructures for High-Performance Supercapacitors. *ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces* **2012**, *4*, 2769–2774. [CrossRef]

16. Mirvaux, B.; Recham, N.; Miot, J.; Courty, M.; Bernard, S.; Beyssac, O.; Davoisne, C.; Sougrati, M.; Demortière, A.; Guyot, F.; et al. Iron Phosphate/Bacteria Composites as Precursors for Textured Electrode Materials with Enhanced Electrochemical Properties. *J. Electrochem. Soc.* **2016**, *163*, A2139–A2148. [CrossRef]

17. Miot, J.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Guyot, F.; Brest, J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Biomineralized α-Fe₂O₃: Texture and Electrochemical Reaction with Li. *Energy Environ. Sci.* **2014**, *7*, 451–460. [CrossRef]

18. Shim, H.W.; Jin, Y.H.; Seo, S.D.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.-W. Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Bacillus Subtilis-Directed Porous Co3O4 Nanostructures. *ACS Nano* **2011**, *5*, 443–449. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19. Rosant, C.; Avalle, B.; Larcher, D.; Dupont, L.; Friboulet, A.; Tarascon, J.-M. Biosynthesis of Co3O4 Electrode Materials by Peptide and Phage Engineering: Comprehension and Future. *Energy Environ. Sci.* **2012**, *5*, 9936–9943. [CrossRef]

20. Li, Q.; Liu, D.; Jia, Z.; Csetenyi, L.; Gadd, G.M. Fungal Biomineralization of Manganese as a Novel Source of Electrochemical Materials. *Curr. Biol.* **2016**, *26*, 950–955. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. Yu, Q.; Morioka, E.; Hirajima, T.; Sasaki, K. Synthesis of Biogenic Mn Oxide and Its Application as Lithium Ion Sieve. In *Integration of Scientific and Industrial Knowledge on Biohydrometallurgy; Guiliani, N., Demergasso, C., Quatrini, R., Remonsellez, F., DavisBelmar, C., Levican, G., Parada, P., Barahona, C., Zale, R., Eds.; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 825, pp. 439–442, ISBN 978-3-03785-891-2.

22. Galezowski, L.; Recham, N.; Larcher, D.; Miot, J.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Guyot, F. Microbially Induced Mineralization of Layered Mn-Oxides Electroactive in Li Batteries. *Front. Microbiol.* **2020**, *11*, 2031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Ravichandran, S.; Radhakrishnan, J.; Sengodan, P.; Rajendran, R. Biosynthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticle from Clerodendrum Phlomidis and Their Decoration with Graphene Oxide for Photocatalytic and Supercapacitor Application. *J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.* **2022**, *33*, 9403–9411. [CrossRef]

24. Capeness, M.J.; Echavarri-Bravo, V.; Horsfall, L.E. Production of Biogenic Nanoparticles for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol and Oxidative Laccase-Like Reactions. *Front. Microbiol.* **2019**, *10*, 997. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Gomez-Bolivar, J.; Mikheenko, I.P.; Orozco, R.L.; Sharma, S.; Banerjee, D.; Walker, M.; Hand, R.A.; Merroun, M.L.; Macaskie, L.E. Synthesis of Pd/Ru Bimetallic Nanoparticles by Escherichia Coli and Potential as a Catalyst for Upgrading 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural Into Liquid Fuel Precursors. *Front. Microbiol.* **2019**, *10*, 1276. [CrossRef]

26. He, P.; Guo, J.; Lei, L.; Jiang, J.; Li, Q.; Hu, Z.; Su, B.; Fu, Z.; Xie, H. Escherichia Coli Templated Iron Oxide Biomineralization under Oscillation. *RSC Adv.* **2021**, *11*, 15010–15016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Donlan, R.M. Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2002**, *8*, 881–890. [CrossRef]

28. Tourney, J.; Ngwenya, B.T. Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) Mediate CaCO3 Morphology and Polymorphism. *Chem. Geol.* **2009**, *262*, 138–146. [CrossRef]

29. Learman, D.R.; Wankel, S.D.; Webb, S.M.; Martinez, N.; Madden, A.S.; Hansel, C.M. Coupled Biotic–Abiotic Mn(II) Oxidation Pathway Mediates the Formation and Structural Evolution of Biogenic Mn Oxides. *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **2011**, *75*, 6048–6063. [CrossRef]

30. Geszvain, K.; McCarthy, J.K.; Tebo, B.M. Elimination of Manganese(II,III) Oxidation in Pseudomonas Putida GB-1 by a Double Knockout of Two Putative Multicopper Oxidase Genes. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2013**, *79*, 357–366. [CrossRef]

31. Tebo, B.M.; Bargar, J.R.; Clement, B.G.; Dick, G.J.; Murray, K.J.; Parker, D.; Verity, R.; Webb, S.M. BIOGENIC MANGANESE OXIDES: Properties and Mechanisms of Formation. *Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.* **2004**, *32*, 287–328. [CrossRef]

32. Brouwers, G.J.; Vijgenboom, E.; Corstjens, P.L.A.M.; Vrind, J.P.M.D. Bacterial Mn2+ Oxidizing Systems and Multicopper Oxidases: An Overview of Mechanisms and Functions. *Geomicrobiol. J.* **2000**, *17*, 1–24. [CrossRef]

33. Villalobos, M.; Toner, B.; Bargar, J.; Sposito, G. Characterization of the Manganese Oxide Produced by Pseudomonas Putida Strain MnB1. *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **2003**, *67*, 2649–2662. [CrossRef]

34. Villalobos, M.; Lanson, B.; Manceau, A.; Toner, B.; Sposito, G. Structural Model for the Biogenic Mn Oxide Produced by Pseudomonas Putida. *Am. Mineral.* **2006**, *91*, 489–502. [CrossRef]

35. Toner, B.; Manceau, A.; Webb, S.M.; Sposito, G. Zinc Sorption to Biogenic Hexagonal-Birnessite Particles within a Hydrated Bacterial Biofilm. *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **2006**, *70*, 27–43. [CrossRef]

36. Parikh, S.J.; Chorover, J. FTIR Spectroscopic Study of Biogenic Mn-Oxide Formation by Pseudomonas Putida GB-1. *Geomicrobiol. J.* **2005**, *22*, 207–218. [CrossRef]

37. Gjermansen, M.; Ragas, P.; Sternberg, C.; Molin, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Characterization of Starvation-Induced Dispersion in Pseudomonas Putida Biofilms. *Environ. Microbiol.* **2005**, *7*, 894–906. [CrossRef]

38. Grote, G.; Krumbein, W.E. Microbial Precipitation of Manganese by Bacteria and Fungi from Desert Rock and Rock Varnish. *Geomicrobiol. J.* **1992**, *10*, 49–57. [CrossRef]

39. Mandernack, K.W.; Post, J.; Tebo, B.M. Manganese Mineral Formation by Bacterial Spores of the Marine Bacillus, Strain SG-1: Evidence for the Direct Oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(IV). *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **1995**, *59*, 4393–4408. [CrossRef]
40. Polgári, M.; Hein, J.R.; Vigh, T.; Szabó-Drubina, M.; Fórizs, I.; Bíró, L.; Müller, A.; Tóth, A.L. Microbial Processes and the Origin of the Úrkút Manganese Deposit, Hungary. *Ore Geol. Rev.* **2012**, *47*, 87–109. [CrossRef]

41. Wang, X.; Yao, J.; Wang, S.; Pan, X.; Xiao, R.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Qu, R. Phototransformation of Estrogens Mediated by Mn(III), Not by Reactive Oxygen Species, in the Presence of Humic Acids. *Chemosphere* **2018**, *201*, 224–233. [CrossRef]

42. Ravel, B.; Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFITT. *J. Synchrotron Radiat.* **2005**, *12*, 537–541. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Adra, A.; Morin, G.; Ona-Nguema, G.; Menguy, N.; Maillot, F.; Casiot, C.; Bruneel, O.; Lebrun, S.; Juillot, F.; Brest, J. Arsenic Scavenging by Aluminum-Substituted Ferrihydrites in a Circumneutral PH River Impacted by Acid Mine Drainage. *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **2013**, *47*, 12784–12792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Miot, J.; Lu, S.; Morin, G.; Adra, A.; Benzerara, K.; Küsel, K. Iron Mineralogy across the Oxycline of a Lignite Mine Lake. *Chem. Geol.* **2016**, *434*, 28–42. [CrossRef]

45. Okazaki, M.; Sugita, T.; Shimizu, M.; Ohode, Y.; Iwamoto, K.; deVrinddeJong, E.W.; deVrind, J.P.M.; Corstjens, P. Partial Purification and Characterization of Manganese-Oxidizing Factors of Pseudomonas Fluorescens GB-1. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **1997**, *63*, 4793–4799. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

46. Toner, B.; Fakra, S.; Villalobos, M.; Warwick, T.; Sposito, G. Spatially Resolved Characterization of Biogenic Manganese Oxide Production within a Bacterial Biofilm. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2005**, *71*, 1300–1310. [CrossRef]

47. Toner, B.; Sposito, G. Reductive Dissolution of Biogenic Manganese Oxides in the Presence of a Hydrated Biofilm. *Geomicrobiol. J.* **2005**, *22*, 171–180. [CrossRef]

48. Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Long, H.; Zhao, X.; Jia, K.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Lu, X.; Zhang, D. BifA Regulates Biofilm Development of Pseudomonas Putida MnB1 as a Primary Response to H2O2 and Mn2+. *Front. Microbiol.* **2018**, *9*, 1490. [CrossRef]

49. Rühs, P.A.; Böni, L.; Fuller, G.G.; Inglis, R.F.; Fischer, P. In-Situ Quantification of the Interfacial Rheological Response of Bacterial Biofilms to Environmental Stimuli. *PLoS ONE* **2013**, *8*, e78524. [CrossRef]

50. Luo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Suib, S.L. Mechanistic and Kinetic Studies of Crystallization of Birnessite. *Inorg. Chem.* **2000**, *39*, 741–747. [CrossRef]

51. Webb, S.M.; Tebo, B.M.; Bargar, J.R. Structural Characterization of Biogenic Mn Oxides Produced in Seawater by the Marine Bacillus Sp. Strain SG-1. *Am. Mineral.* **2005**, *90*, 1342–1357. [CrossRef]

52. Eren, E.; Gumus, H.; Sarihan, A. Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Pb(II) Adsorption Behavior of K- and H-Birnessite Samples. *Desalination* **2011**, *279*, 75–85. [CrossRef]

53. Grangeon, S.; Lanson, B.; Miyata, N.; Tani, Y.; Manceau, A. Structure of Nanocrystalline Phyllomanganates Produced by Freshwater Fungi. *Am. Mineral.* **2010**, *95*, 1608–1616. [CrossRef]

54. Wang, Y.; Benkaddour, S.; Marafatto, F.F.; Peña, J. Diffusion- and PH-Dependent Reactivity of Layer-Type MnO₂: Reactions at Particle Edges versus Vacancy Sites. *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **2018**, *52*, 3476–3485. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

55. Dvoranová, D.; Brezová, V.; Mazúr, M.; Malati, M.A. Investigations of Metal-Doped Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts. *Appl. Catal. B Environ.* **2002**, *37*, 91–105. [CrossRef]

56. Kim, S.S.; Bargar, J.R.; Nealson, K.H.; Flood, B.E.; Kirschvink, J.L.; Raub, T.D.; Tebo, B.M.; Villalobos, M. Searching for Biosignatures Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Analysis of Manganese Oxides. *Astrobiology* **2011**, *11*, 775–786. [CrossRef]

57. Stoyanova, R.; Zhecheva, E.; Vassilev, S. Mn4+ Environment in Layered Li[Mg0.5-XNiMn0.5]O Oxides Monitored by EPR Spectroscopy. *J. Solid State Chem.* **2006**, *179*, 378–388. [CrossRef]

58. Stoyanova, R.; Gorova, M.; Zhecheva, E. EPR of Mn4+ in Spinels Li1+xMn2-xO4 with $0 \le x \le 0.1$. *J. Phys. Chem. Solids* **2000**, *61*, 609–614. [CrossRef]

59. Stoyanova, R.; Gorova, M.; Zhecheva, E. EPR Monitoring of Mn4+ Distribution in Li4Mn5O12 Spinels. *J. Phys. Chem. Solids* **2000**, *61*, 615–620. [CrossRef]

60. Kakazey, M.; Ivanova, N.; Sokolsky, G.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.G. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of MnO₂ Powders. *Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.* **2001**, *4*, J1. [CrossRef]

61. Najafpour, M.M.; Kompany-Zareh, M.; Zahraei, A.; Sedigh, D.J.; Jaccard, H.; Khoshkam, M.; Britt, R.D.; Casey, W.H. Mechanism, Decomposition Pathway and New Evidence for Self-Healing of Manganese Oxides as Efficient Water Oxidizing Catalysts: New Insights. *Dalton Trans.* **2013**, *42*, 14603–14611. [CrossRef]

62. Silvester, E.; Manceau, A.; Drits, V.A. Structure of Synthetic Monoclinic Na-Rich Birnessite and Hexagonal Birnessite, II, Results from Chemical Studies and EXAFS Spectroscopy. *Am. Mineral.* **1997**, *82*, 962–978. [CrossRef]

63. Palmer, J.; Flint, S.; Brooks, J. Bacterial Cell Attachment, the Beginning of a Biofilm. *J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **2007**, *34*, 577–588. [CrossRef]

64. Chen, X.B.; Wang, C.; Ye, F.M.; Zhu, Q.; Du, G.; Zhong, Y.; Peng, X.; Jiang, J.Z. Phase Transition of Manganese (Oxyhydr)Oxides Nanofibers and Their Applications to Lithium Ion Batteries and Separation Membranes. *CrystEngComm* **2012**, *14*, 3142. [CrossRef]

65. Katkar, P.K.; Marje, S.J.; Pujari, S.S.; Khalate, S.A.; Deshmukh, P.R.; Patil, U.M. Single-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of Manganese Phosphate Microrods as a Cathode Material for Highly Stable Flexible Solid-State Symmetric Supercapacitors. *Synth. Met.* **2020**, *267*, 116446. [CrossRef]

66. Hill, L.I.; Verbaere, A.; Guyomard, D. MnO₂ (α-, β-, γ-) Compounds Prepared by Hydrothermal-Electrochemical Synthesis: Characterization, Morphology, and Lithium Insertion Behavior. *J. Power Sources* **2003**, *119–121*, 226–231. [CrossRef]
67. Yin, J.; Takeuchi, E.S.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Marschilok, A.C. Synthetic Control of Manganese Birnessite: Impact of Crystallite Size on Li, Na, and Mg Based Electrochemistry. *Inorg. Chim. Acta* **2016**, *453*, 230–237. [CrossRef]

68. Huang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, L.; Ruoff, R.S.; Wen, Z.; Liu, Q. Self-Assembly of Mesoporous Nanotubes Assembled from Interwoven Ultrathin Birnessite-Type $MnO_2$ Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. *Sci. Rep.* **2014**, *4*, 3878. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

69. Manthiram, A.; Kim, J. Low Temperature Synthesis of Insertion Oxides for Lithium Batteries. *Chem. Mater.* **1998**, *10*, 2895–2909. [CrossRef]

70. Busalmen, J.P.; de Sanchez, S.R. Electrochemical Polarization-Induced Changes in the Growth of Individual Cells and Biofilms of Pseudomonas Fluorescens (ATCC 17552). *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **2005**, *71*, 6235–6240. [CrossRef]

71. Duan, D.X.; Lin, C.G. Effect of Surface Free Energy and Electrochemical Polarization on Attachment of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria. *Adv. Mater. Res.* **2011**, *199–200*, 1967–1972. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.