# The nutritional status affects the complete blood count of goats experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus

Steve Ceriac, Cyntia Jayles, Rémy Arquet, Dalila Feuillet, Yoann Felicite, Harry Archimède, Jean-Christophe Bambou

► To cite this version:

Steve Ceriac, Cyntia Jayles, Rémy Arquet, Dalila Feuillet, Yoann Felicite, et al.. The nutritional status affects the complete blood count of goats experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. BMC Veterinary Research, 2017, 13 (1), 10.1186/s12917-017-1248-4. hal-02624439

HAL Id: hal-02624439

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02624439

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

# The nutritional status affects the complete blood count of goats experimentally infected with *Haemonchus contortus*

S. Cériac¹, C. Jayles², R. Arquet², D. Feuillet¹, Y. Félicité¹, H. Archimède¹ and J.-C. Bambou¹*

**Abstract**

**Background:** Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) remains the most important pathogenic constraint of small ruminant production worldwide. The improvement of the host immune response against GIN though breeding for improved animal resistance, vaccination and nutritional supplementation appear as very promising methods. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of four nutritional status differing in protein and energy levels (Hay: 5.1 MJ/Kg of dry matter (DM) and 7.6% of crude protein (CP), Ban: 8.3 MJ/Kg of DM and 7.5% of CP, Soy: 7.6 MJ/Kg of DM and 17.3% of CP, BS: 12.7 MJ/Kg of DM and 7.4% of CP) on the haematological disturbances due to *Haemonchus contortus* infection in Creole kid goats.

**Results:** No significant effect of the nutritional status was observed for faecal egg count (FEC) but the experimental infection induced haematological disturbances whose intensity and lengthening were dependent on the nutritional status. A transient marked regenerative macrocytic hypochromic anaemia as revealed by a decrease of packed cell volume (PCV), red blood cells (RBC) and hemoglobin and an increase of reticulocytes was observed in all infected groups except Hay. In this latter, the anaemia settled until the end of the experiment. Furthermore, *H. contortus* induced a thrombocytopenia significantly more pronounced in the group under the lowest nutritional status in term of protein (Hay and Ban). A principal component analysis revealed that the variables that discriminated the nutritional status were the average daily gain (ADG) and the PCV, considered as measures of the level of resilience to *H. contortus* infection. Moreover, the variables that discriminated infected and non-infected animals were mostly related to the biology of RBC (i.e. size and hemoglobin content) and they were correlated with FEC.

**Conclusions:** The severity and the lengthening of the regenerative anaemia and the thrombocytopenia induced by *H. contortus* have been affected by the nutritional status. The protein enriched diets induced resilience to the infection rather than resistance. This suggests that resilience is associated with an improved regenerative capacity of the bone marrow. However, this needs to be further investigated to understand the relationships between resistance, resilience and dietary supplementation.

**Keywords:** Blood cells, Gastrointestinal nematode, Goats, Nutrition

**Background**

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection remains the most important pathogenic constraint of small ruminant production worldwide. The use of chemical drugs as the unique control method is compromised due to the widespread development of anthelmintic resistant GIN populations throughout the world [1, 2]. In addition, the

negative possible environmental impacts of anthelmintic residues and the growing consumer demand for chemical-free animal products increase the need for alternative and/or complementary control strategies [3]. The integrated management of GIN infection aims to better control the GIN populations in order to reach a favourable equilibrium for animal production between host and parasites. Thus, numerous axes of research have been developed to control the parasite population both during the host and the free living stages. The improvement of the host immune response against GIN

<footnote>* Correspondence: jean-christophe.bambou@inra.fr
¹URZ, INRA, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
though breeding for improved animal resistance, vaccination and nutritional supplementation appear as very promising methods [4, 5].

Nutritional management of small ruminants has long been considered as a tool for the control of GIN infections [6, 7]. It has been suggested that the nutritional status and the capacity of the host to mount an efficient immune response against invading pathogens are closely associated [8, 9]. Indeed, mounting an immune response is both expensive, in terms of proteins, and calories, because of the metabolic requirement of immune cells, the synthesis of proteinaceous immune mediators and the repairing of damaged tissue [10]. Minerals, trace elements and vitamins are also required for the development of immunity [11, 12]. However, numerous studies have shown that the level of nutrition of the host improve either the resilience or the resistance to GIN infections [13, 14]. The resistance is considered as the capacity of the host to develop an efficient protective response and limit the level of parasitism and the resilience as the capacity to limit the pathophysiological consequences of the infection and maintain the level of production. The expression of resilience or resistance would depend on the host genotype, the physiological stage and the quality of the diet mainly in term of protein [15, 16].

Studies that investigate the impact of the nutritional status of infected small ruminants on the interaction between the GIN parasitism and the physiological disturbances are lacking. Therefore the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the nutritional status on the haematological disturbances due to *Haemonchus contortus* infection in Creole kid goats.

## Methods

### Animals, management and experimental design

This experiment was conducted at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Animal Production Unit (INRA-PTEA, Guadeloupe, French West Indies) experimental facilities (16°N16' latitude, 61°W30' longitude). The Creole goat kids (n = 60, 18.88 ± 3.54 kg body weight (BW); 7 months old) had experienced GIN infection at pasture before been randomly placed indoors in four collective pens (n = 15 kids/pen) corresponding to the experimental groups, 1 month before the experimental infection. The animals were drenched with moxidectine (Cydectine®, Fort Dodge Veterinaria S.A., Tours, France, 300 µg/kg BW) and toltrazuril (Baycox Ovis, Bayer HealthCare, Loos, France, 20 mg/kg BW) and housed under worm-free conditions. During this period, nematode faecal egg counts (FEC) remained at zero. Each group was placed under one of 4 distinct dietary status: Hay (Hay ad libitum non supplemented), Ban (Hay ad libitum + 1250 g of Fresh unripe banana/kids),

Soy (Hay +250 g Soybean Meal/kids) and BS (Hay ad libitum + 125 g of Soybean Meal +625 g of Fresh unripe banana/kids). The composition and nutritional values of the diets is shown in Table 1. The supplement, fresh banana (cut into thin slices each day) and/or soybean meal were distributed first and individually with the help of yoke traps during the time of diet consumption. Thereafter, the hay was distributed ad libitum and animals have free-choice access to fresh water. Feeding stalls were long enough to avoid competition for hay between the kids. The offered hay was adjusted to the groups BW (120% of the maximum intake capacity). After a 1 month period of adaptation to the collective pens and the diet conditions, a total of 10 kids/pen in each group were experimentally infected with a single oral dose of 10,000 *H. contortus* third-stage infective larvae (L3) and 5 kids/pen remain non-infected (infected and non-infected groups on the same diet remained in the same collective pen). The L3 were obtained 35 days before challenge from coproculture of monospecifically infected donor Creole goats with isolates previously obtained from Creole goats reared on pasture in different farms in Guadeloupe [17].

### Growth measurements

The animals were weighed weekly from the day of infection until the end of the experiment to adjust the offered quantities at 120% of the maximum intake capacity according to BW changes and to measure the individual growth rates.

### Faecal egg count

Approximately 10 g of faeces were weekly collected during experimental infection directly from the rectum of each animal to determine the FEC. The faeces were kept

<table><caption>**Table 1** Composition and nutritional values of diets</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="4">Nutritional conditions</th></tr><tr><th>Hay</th><th>Ban</th><th>Soy</th><th>BS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="5">Ingredients (g/Kg DM)</td></tr><tr><td>Hay</td><td>1000</td><td>750</td><td>780</td><td>762.5</td></tr><tr><td>Fresh banana</td><td>0</td><td>250</td><td>0</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>Soybean meal</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>220</td><td>112.5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5">Chemical composition (%)</td></tr><tr><td>OM<sup>a</sup></td><td>88.2</td><td>92.9</td><td>94.2</td><td>94.7</td></tr><tr><td>CP<sup>b</sup></td><td>7.6</td><td>8.3</td><td>17.3</td><td>12.7</td></tr><tr><td>NDF<sup>c</sup></td><td>65.9</td><td>50.8</td><td>46.3</td><td>45.0</td></tr><tr><td>ADF<sup>d</sup></td><td>32.2</td><td>25.8</td><td>23.2</td><td>21.8</td></tr><tr><td>ADL<sup>e</sup></td><td>4.6</td><td>3.0</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.7</td></tr><tr><td>ME<sup>f</sup> (MJ/Kg DM)</td><td>5.1</td><td>7.5</td><td>7.6</td><td>7.4</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>OM Organic Matter, <sup>b</sup>CP Crude protein, <sup>c</sup>NDF Neutral Detergent Fiber, <sup>d</sup>ADF Acid Detergent Fiber, <sup>e</sup>ADL Acid Detergent Lignin, <sup>f</sup>ME Metabolizable Energy</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Least square means of Faecal egg counts (FEC) according to the nutritional status: Ban: Banana (•, Infected and gray circle, Non-Infected); Hay (■, Infected and gray square, Non-Infected); Soy: Soybean Meal (▲, Infected and gray triangle, Non-Infected); BS: Soybean Meal + Banana (♦, Infected and gray diamond, Non-Infected)</figcaption></figure>

concentration significantly decreased in the infected animals but not in the non-infected ones. In the infected animals, at 21 d.p.i. the Hay group reached the lowest values for these haematological parameters except MCHC and it remained significantly lower than the Ban, Soy and BS groups (*P* < 0.01, Fig. 3). The mean corpuscular volume (MCV) increased significantly (*P* < 0.01) in the infected animals whatever the dietary status. No interaction between time and the dietary status was observed for MCV in the non-infected animals (*P* > 0.05).

### Circulating immune cells

The results for circulating basophils were negligible whatever the dietary or the infection status (data not

shown). A significant interaction between the dietary and the infection status and the time was observed for the circulating immune cells except for circulating monocytes (*P* < 0.01, Fig. 4). Circulating lymphocytes and neutrophils decreased slightly but significantly in infected animals (*P* < 0.05). No variation of the circulating monocytes was observed during the course of the experiment whatever the dietary and the infection status (*P* > 0.05). The circulating eosinophils were significantly higher in the infected animals from 14 to 35 d.p.i. (*P* < 0.001). At 35 d.p.i. the circulating eosinophils decreased to the level of non-infected animals in all dietary status except for Hay.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Means and standard errors of Average Daily Gain (ADG) according to the nutritional and the infection status</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Least square means of haematological parameters according to the nutritional and the infection status: Ban: Banana (•, Infected and gray circle, Non-Infected); Hay (■, Infected and gray square, Non-Infected); Soy: Soybean Meal (▲, Infected and gray triangle, Non-Infected); BS: Soybean Meal + Banana (◆, Infected and gray diamond, Non-Infected)</figcaption></figure>

## Principal component analysis of the haematological, parasitological and zootechnical parameters

The first three principal components of the PCA explained 70.3% of the total variation (34.1%, 19.5% and 16.6% respectively, Table 2). The Fig. 5a shows the contribution of each parameter to the first and the second principal component. The first principal component seemed to contrast FEC, MCV with Platelets, MCH and MCHC. The second principal component seemed to be mainly defined by the contrast between PCV, RBC ADG, and monocytes, lymphocytes and eosinophils. Each animal at each time point, from 28 to 49 d.p.i. was

projected on the scatter plot using the two first principal components (Fig. 5b). The infection status (infected and non-infected) was mainly described by the first principal component and the dietary status (Hay, Ban, Soy and BS) by the second principal component.

## Discussion

The nutritional status is closely associated with the intensity of the pathological impact of GIN infection in small ruminants. It has been shown that an improved nutritional status can reduce significantly production losses due to GIN infection by reducing both morbidity
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** Least square means of blood immune cells according to the nutritional and the infection status: Ban: Banana (■, Infected and gray circle, Non-Infected); Hay (■, Infected and gray square, Non-Infected); Soy: Soybean Meal (▲, Infected and gray triangle, Non-Infected); BS: Soybean Meal + Banana (♦, Infected and gray diamond, Non-Infected)</figcaption></figure>

and mortality [21, 22]. In *H. contortus* infection, morbidity and mortality are mainly caused by the haematopoagous activity of both larval and adult stages of the parasite whose consequence is an irreversible loss of protein. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the nutritional status on the haematological disturbances due to *H. contortus* infection in Creole kid goats. No significant effect of the nutritional status was observed for FEC. In accordance with a previous study, a single bolus oral experimental infection of Creole kid goats that previously experienced natural GIN infection

at pasture induce a low level of parasitism measured through the FEC and the lengthening of the prepatent period [17]. Nonetheless, we showed a significant interaction between the nutritional and the infection status on the growth rate. The animal placed under the lowest nutritional status in term of protein (i.e. Hay and Ban) showed the lowest growth rate and the experimental infection reduced the growth rate only for animals placed in the Ban and the Soy groups. Furthermore, the experimental infection induced haematological disturbances whose intensity and lengthening were dependent on the

<table><caption>**Table 2** Estimate of eigenvalues (λj), percentage of variance (λ%), and cumulative variance and eigenvectors associated to the three first principal components of the animal responses during an experimental *H. contortus* infection (from 28 to 49 days post-infection)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">F<sup>a</sup></th><th rowspan="2">λj</th><th rowspan="2">λ(%)</th><th rowspan="2">Cumulative variance (%)</th><th colspan="10">Associated eigenvectors<sup>b</sup></th></tr><tr><th>ADG<sup>b</sup></th><th>FEC<sup>c</sup></th><th>PCV<sup>d</sup></th><th>RBC<sup>e</sup></th><th>Hgb<sup>f</sup></th><th>MCV<sup>g</sup></th><th>MCH<sup>h</sup></th><th>MCHC<sup>i</sup></th><th>Plat<sup>j</sup></th><th>Lym<sup>k</sup></th><th>Mon<sup>l</sup></th><th>Neut<sup>m</sup></th><th>Eos<sup>n</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>4.78</td><td>34.14</td><td>34.14</td><td>0.26</td><td>-0.36</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.66</td><td>0.84</td><td>-0.50</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.24</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2.73</td><td>19.49</td><td>53.63</td><td>0.59</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.25</td><td>-0.13</td><td>-0.23</td><td>0.13</td><td>-0.48</td><td>-0.56</td><td>-0.29</td><td>-0.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2.33</td><td>16.63</td><td>70.27</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.18</td><td>-0.02</td><td>0.55</td><td>-0.44</td><td>-0.61</td><td>-0.44</td><td>0.54</td><td>0.42</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.16</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>F Functions (Principal components), <sup>b</sup>ADG Average Daily Gain, <sup>c</sup>FEC Feacal Egg counts, <sup>d</sup>PCV Packed Cell Volume, <sup>e</sup>RBC Red Blood Cells, <sup>f</sup>Hgb Hemoglobin, <sup>g</sup>MCV Mean Corpuscular Volume, <sup>h</sup>MCH Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin, <sup>i</sup>MCHC Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, <sup>j</sup>Plat Platelets, <sup>k</sup>Lym Lymphocytes, <sup>l</sup>Mon Monocytes, <sup>m</sup>Neut Neutrophiles, <sup>n</sup>Eos Eosinophils</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

Function 1 (34.14 %)

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

Function 1 (34.14 %)

**Fig. 5** Principal component analysis of the haematological, parasitological and zootechnical parameters. **a** Mapping of the parameters and (b) Representation of the animals according to the dietary (Ban: Banana; Hay; Soy: Soybean Meal; BS: Soybean Meal + Banana) and the infection (I: experimentally infected with *Haemonchus contortus*; NI: Non-infected) status from 28 until 49 days post-infection on two-dimensional scatter plot. FEC: Faecal egg counts; MCV: Mean Cell Volume; ADG: Average Daily Gain; PCV: Packed Cell Volume; RBC: Red Blood Cells; Hgb: Hemoglobin; MCH: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin; MCHC: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration

nutritional status. A transient marked anaemia as re-
vealed by a decrease of PCV, RBC and hemoglobin con-
centrations was observed in all infected groups except
Hay. In this latter, the anaemia settled until the end of
the experiment. Interestingly, the concentration of
hemoglobin (MCHC) did not increase proportionally
with the increase in RBC size (MCV). These RBC with a
larger volume and a lower hemoglobin concentration

were probably reticulocytes (i.e. immatures RBC) as pre-
viously shown [23]. These results were in accordance
with previous studies conducted in sheep, characterizing
the type of anaemia induced by *H. contortus* as regenera-
tive macrocytic hypochromic anaemia [24, 25]. Indeed,
the pathogenesis of regenerative anaemia includes exter-
nal hemorrhage which is chronic in the case of *H. con-
tortus* infection. Furthermore, in the present experiment
the number of platelets decreased in all infected animals. This thrombocytopenia was significantly more pronounced in the Hay group, as for PCV, RBC and hemoglobin. Similarly, it has been shown in *H. contortus* infected sheep that the number of platelets decreased progressively during the course of *H. contortus* infection [23]. To our knowledge, besides this study in sheep and ours in goats, this result has never been described in the literature. However, a platelet aggregation and adhesion inhibitor from adults *H. contortus* has been identified and characterized in vitro [26]. It must be emphasized that the host blood taken from the abomasal mucosa is the main nutrient source of the parasitic stage of *H. contortus*. Altogether, these results strongly suggested that *H. contortus* has developed a broad-spectrum strategy to manipulate the host's hemostatic system, which would target especially the blood platelets.

With the exception of eosinophils, the blood leucocytes counts were not affected by the infection and the nutritional status. Indeed, many studies showed significant correlations between resistance/susceptibility to GIN infection and the magnitude of the peripheral blood eosinophil [27]. Even though this relationship has not been observed in all studies, it is largely admitted that peripheral blood eosinophil plays a key role in the protective response to GIN [28–30]. In contrast with a previous study in Creole goat [31], blood eosinophil counts were not affected by the nutritional status. In the present study the nutritional status were not as contrasted as it was previously. On the other hand, it has been shown that peripheral blood lymphocytes are also involved in the protective response to GIN. A significant negative phenotypic correlation has been found between blood lymphocyte counts and *H. contortus* fecundity [32]. In contrast, in another sheep breed, lymphopenia was observed in *H. contortus* infected lambs [33]. However, the close association between the resistance to GIN infection and the host immune response has been demonstrated in a study showing that depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes significantly increased the parasitic load in a resistant sheep breed [28]. In Creole goats experimentally infected, we have showed that the level of circulating activated CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were higher in susceptible animals compared with resistant [34]. Altogether these results obtained in different sheep breeds and goats, with different level of parasitism confirmed the effective role of lymphocytes in the host response against GIN, but also emphasize the need to better investigate this relationship.

The comparison between the Hay and the Ban groups showed that infected animals in the Hay groups prioritize growth at the expense of a marked pathological impact while the reverse was observed in the Ban group. These results were partly in keeping with

previous studies suggesting that an improved nutritional status (here Soy and BS compared to Hay and Ban) induced resilience rather than resistance to the experimental *H. contortus* infection (i.e. reduced pathological impact for the same parasitic load) [25, 35, 36]. Interestingly, the PCA revealed that in our study the variables that discriminated the nutritional status were ADG and PCV, considered as measures of the level of resilience to *H. contortus* infection, and eosinophils. Moreover, the variables that discriminated infected and non-infected animals at the cellular level were mostly related to the biology of red blood cells (i.e. size and hemoglobin content) and they were correlated with FEC. The association of eosinophils with resilience was not surprising in our animal model since we had previously shown that, in contrast with numerous studies in sheep, blood eosinophil counts were associated with the level of infection rather than the protective response in goats [34].

Otherwise, other studies including one of ours, have also reported resistance to GIN (i.e. reduced pathological impact and parasitic load) induced by an improved nutritional status [31, 37, 38]. Discrepancy between the different studies could be attributed to the animals physiological stage which would influenced the trade-offs between the immune response against invading pathogens and others physiological functions [39]. The quality of the metabolizable protein arising from the rumen (microbial protein vs by-pass protein), could also be an explanation since the amino acid composition of immune proteins is more compatible with that of by-pass proteins [16]. Further research is needed to better understand the nutrition × parasitism interaction in small ruminant for a better fine tuning of the technical recommendations to breeders.

## Conclusions

The results showed that infection with *H. contortus* induced a regenerative anaemia and a thrombocytopenia. The severity and lengthening of these pathological disturbances have been affected by the nutritional status, the protein enriched diets induced resilience to the infection rather than resistance. This suggests that resilience is associated with an improved regenerative capacity of the bone marrow. However, further investigation to understand the relationships between resistance, resilience and dietary supplementation.

## Acknowledgments

The authors want to give thanks to the Gardel team for care and handling of the animals: T. Kandassamy, W. Troupé, J. Gobardhan and S.-A. Matou.

## Funding

This study was funded by the Project Agroecodiv (La Région Guadeloupe and Fonds Européens FEDER) and the INRA métaprogramme GISA (Gestion Intégrée de la Santé Animale) Project Strep (drastic and Sustainable Treatment Reduction against Parasitism in livestock). S. Cériac was supported
by a doctoral fellowship from la Région Guadeloupe and the division of animal genetics of INRA.

## Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the results of this study are included within this article.

## Authors' contributions

JCB, HA and SC conceived and designed the experiments, CJ and RA and the Gardel team collected samples for the haematological and parasitological analysis. DF and YF performed the haematological and parasitological analysis. JCB and SC performed the statistical analysis and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal care, handling techniques, procedures as well as license for experimental infection and blood sampling were approved by the current law on animal experimentation and ethics (HC-69-2014-1 from the Animal Care and Use Committee of French West Indies and Guyana), according to the certificate number A-971-18-02 of authorization to experiment on living animals issued by the French Ministry of Agriculture, before the initiation of the experiment.

## Consent for publication

Not applicable.

## Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Author details

¹URZ, INRA, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France. ²PTEA, INRA, 97170 Le Moule, Guadeloupe, France.

Received: 21 April 2017 Accepted: 31 October 2017

Published online: 09 November 2017

## References

1. Bishop SC, Morris CA. Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats. Small Rumin Res. 2007;70(1):48–59.

2. Papadopoulos E. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes. Small Rumin Res. 2008;76(1–2):99–103.

3. Beynon SA. Potential environmental consequences of administration of anthelmintics to sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2012;189(1):113–24.

4. Baker RL, Gray GD. Worm control for small ruminants in tropical Asia. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). 2003; Monograph 113:63–95.

5. van Wyk JA, Bath GF. The FAMACHA(c) system for managing haemonchosis in sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment. Vet Res. 2002;33(5):509–29.

6. Clunies Ross I, Gordon H. McL: nutritional factors affecting resistance to haemonchosis. Aust Vet J. 1933;9:100–7.

7. Gibson TE. The influence of nutrition on the relationships between gastrointestinal parasites and their hosts. Proc Nutr Soc. 1963;22:15–20.

8. Adams CA. Nutrition-based health in animal production. Nutr Res Rev. 2006;19(1):79–89.

9. Colditz IG. Six costs of immunity to gastrointestinal nematode infections. Parasite Immunol. 2008;30(2):63–70.

10. Lochmiller RL, Deerenberg C. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos. 2000;88(1):87–98.

11. Koski KG, Scott ME. Gastrointestinal nematodes, trace elements, and immunity. J Trace Elem Exp Med. 2003;16(4):237–51.

12. McClure SJ. How minerals may influence the development and expression of immunity to endoparasites in livestock. Parasite Immunol. 2008;30(2):89–100.

13. Torres-Acosta JF, Sandoval-Castro CA, Hoste H, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Camara-Sarmiento R, Alonso-Diaz MA. Nutritional manipulation of sheep and goats for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes under hot humid and subhumid tropical conditions. Small Rumin Res. 2012;103(1):28–40.

14. Walkden-Brown SW, Kahn LP. Nutritional modulation of resistance and resilience to gastrointestinal nematode infection - a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2002;15(6):912–24.

15. Knox MR, Torres-Acosta JF, Aguilar-Caballero AJ. Exploiting the effect of dietary supplementation of small ruminants on resilience and resistance against gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol. 2006;139(4):385–93.

16. Houdijk JGM. Differential effects of protein and energy scarcity on resistance to nematode parasites. Small Rumin Res. 2012;103(1):41–9.

17. Bambou JC, de la Chevrotiere C, Varo H, Arquet R, Kooyman FNJ, Mandonnet N. Serum antibody responses in Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2008;158(4):311–8.

18. Aumont G, R. Pouillot, Mandonnet N: Le dénobrement des éléments parasitaires: Un outil pour l'étude de la résistance génétique aux endo-parasites chez les petits ruminants. Workshop final de l'AT CIRAD-MIPA 72/ 94, Guadeloupe 1997.

19. Dawkins HJS, Windon RG, Eagleson GK. Eosinophil responses in sheep selected for high and low responsiveness to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Int J Parasitol. 1989;19(2):199–205.

20. Le S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 2008;25(1):1–18.

21. Sykes AR, Coop RL. Interaction between nutrition and gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. New Zeal Vet J. 2001;49(6):222–6.

22. Walkden-Brown SW, Kahn LP: Nutritional modulation of resistance and resilience to gastrointestinal nematode infection - a review. In: International symposium on new challenges for animal science in a new century 2001; Sendai, Japan; 2001: 912-924.

23. Andronicos NM, Henshall JM, Le Jambre LF, Hunt PW, Ingham AB. A one shot blood phenotype can identify sheep that resist Haemonchus contortus challenge. Vet Parasitol. 2014;205(3–4):595–605.

24. Khan FA, Sahoo A, Sonawane GG, Karim SA, Dhakad S, Pareek AK, Tripathi BN. Effect of dietary protein on responses of lambs to repeated Haemonchus contortus infection. Livest Sci. 2012;150(1–3):143–51.

25. Abbott EM, Parkins JJ, Holmes PH. The effect of dietary-protein on the pathogenesis of acute ovine haemonchosis. Vet Parasitol. 1986; 20(4):275–89.

26. Crab A, Noppe W, Pelicaen C, Van Hoorelbeke K, Deckmyn H. The parasitic hematophagous worm Haemonchus contortus inhibits human platelet aggregation and adhesion: partial purification of a platelet inhibitor. Thromb Haemost. 2002;87(5):899–904.

27. Meeusen E, Balic A, Bowles V. Cells, cytokines and other molecules associated with rejection of gastrointestinal nematode parasites. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;108(1–2):121–5.

28. Gill HS. Genetic control of acquired resistance to haemonchosis in merino lambs. Parasite Immunol. 1991;13:617–28.

29. Adams DB. Systemic responses to challenge infection with Haemonchus contortus in immune merino sheep. Vet Res Commun. 1993;17(1):25–35.

30. Woolaston RR, Manueli P, Eady SJ, Barger IA, LeJambre LF, Banks DJD, Windon RG. The value of circulating eosinophil count as a selection criterion for resistance of sheep to trichostrongyle parasites. Int J Parasitol. 1996;26(1):123–6.

31. Bambou JC, Archimede H, Arquet R, Mahieu M, Alexandre G, Gonzalez-Garcia E, Mandonnet N. Effect of dietary supplementation on resistance to experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus in Creole kids. Vet Parasitol. 2011;178(3–4):279–85.

32. Rowe A, McMaster K, Emery D, Sangster N. Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep: parasite fecundity correlates with worm size and host lymphocyte counts. Vet Parasitol. 2008;153(3–4):285–93.

33. Ortolani EL, Leal MLD, Minervino AHH, Aires AR, Coop RL, Jackson F, Suttle NF. Effects of parasitism on cellular immune response in sheep experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196(1–2):230–4.

34. Bambou JC, Gonzalez-Garcia E, de la Chevrotiere C, Arquet R, Vachieri N, Mandonnet N. Peripheral immune response in resistant and susceptible Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Small Rumin Res. 2009;82(1):34–9.

35. Wallace DS, Bairden K, Duncan JL, Fishwick G, Holmes PH, McKellar QA, Murray M, Parkins JJ, Stear M: Influence of soyabean meal supplementation on the resistance of Scottish blackface lambs to haemonchosis. Res Vet Sci 1996, 60(2):138-143.

36. Datta FU, Nolan JV, Rowe JB, Gray GD. Protein supplementation improves the performance of parasitised sheep fed a straw-based diet. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28(8):1269–78.
37. Louvandini H, Veloso CFM, Paludo GR, Dell'Porto A, Gennari SM, McManus CM. Influence of protein supplementation on the resistance and resilience on young hair sheep naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes during rainy and dry seasons. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137(1-2):103-11.

38. Nnadi PA, Kamalu TN, Onah DN. The effect of dietary protein on the productivity of west African dwarf (WAD) goats infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2009;161(3-4):232-8.

39. Rauw W. Immune response from a resource allocation perspective. Front Genet. 2012;3(267)

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and we will help you at every step:

* We accept pre-submission inquiries

* Our selector tool helps you to find the most relevant journal

* We provide round the clock customer support

* Convenient online submission

* Thorough peer review

* Inclusion in PubMed and all major indexing services

* Maximum visibility for your research

Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit

BioMed Central