# Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock

Guillaume Hekimian, Fatima Kharcha, Nicolas Bréchot, Matthieu Schmidt, Cécile Ghander, Guillaume Lebreton, Xavier Girerd, Christophe Tresallet, Jean Trouillet, Pascal Leprince, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Guillaume Hekimian, Fatima Kharcha, Nicolas Bréchot, Matthieu Schmidt, Cécile Ghander, et al. "Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock." Annals of Intensive Care, 2016, 6 (1), pp.117-139. 10.1186/s13613-016-0219-4. hal-01406599

HAL Id: hal-01406599

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01406599

Submitted on 1 Dec 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

RESEARCH

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

# Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock

Guillaume Hekimian<sup>1,2*†</sup>, Fatima Kharcha<sup>3†</sup>, Nicolas Bréchot<sup>1,2</sup>, Matthieu Schmidt<sup>1,2</sup>, Cécile Ghander<sup>3</sup>, Guillaume Lebreton<sup>4</sup>, Xavier Girerd<sup>3</sup>, Christophe Tresallet<sup>5</sup>, Jean-Louis Trouillet<sup>1,2</sup>, Pascal Leprince<sup>4</sup>, Jean Chastre<sup>1,2</sup>, Alain Combes<sup>1,2</sup> and Charles-Edouard Luyt<sup>1,2</sup>

**Abstract**

**Background:** Pheochromocytoma, a rare catecholamine-producing tumor, might provoke stress-induced Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy and severe cardiogenic shock. Because venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) rescue of pheochromocytoma-induced refractory cardiogenic shock has rarely been reported, we reviewed our ICU patients' presentations and outcomes.

**Methods:** All pheochromocytoma-induced refractory cardiogenic shock cases managed with VA-ECMO (January 2007–March 2015) were prospectively included and reviewed. We also performed a systematic review on this topic.

**Results:** Nine patients (7 women, 2 men; 31–51 [median, 43 (IQR 36–49) years old]) were included; none had a previously known pheochromocytoma. Six of them had medical histories suggestive of the diagnosis: palpitations and headaches for several months for four, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1 for one and recurrent Takotsubo disease for one; at hospital admission, all were hypertensive despite cardiogenic shock. Three others had an identified surgical triggering factor. All nine patients rapidly developed refractory cardiogenic shock with very severe left ventricular (LV) impairment (LV ejection-fraction range 5–20%; LV outflow-tract velocity–time integral range 3–8 cm). Seven patients' abdominal computed tomography scans showed pheochromocytoma-suggestive adrenal gland tumors (no scan during ICU stay for 2). Despite VA-ECMO implantation, three patients died of refractory multiple organ failure. For the six others, myocardial function improved and ECMO was removed 3–7 days post-implantation; α- and β-blockers were progressively introduced. Five survivors underwent pheochromocytoma excision 3 weeks–4 months post-ICU discharge, with satisfactory outcomes. One patient, whose pheochromocytoma was diagnosed 1 year after the index event, underwent uneventful surgical adrenalectomy. Systematic review retrieved 40 cases of pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical support (mostly ECMO), with a mortality rate of 7%. Pheochromocytoma was removed surgically after mechanical support weaning in 31 patients and during mechanical support in 5. Four were not operated.

**Conclusions:** Pheochromocytoma is a rare but reversible cause of cardiogenic shock amenable to VA-ECMO rescue. Adrenal gland imaging should be obtained for all patients with unexplained cardiogenic shock. Lastly, it might be safer to perform adrenalectomy several weeks after the initial catastrophic presentation, once recovery of LV systolic function is complete.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<footnote>*Correspondence: guillaume.hekimian@aphp.fr</footnote>

<footnote>†Guillaume Hekimian and Fatima Kharcha contributed equally to this work</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Cardiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
**Background**

Pheochromocytoma, called paraganglioma when extra-adrenal, is a rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumor arising from chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla. Its usual clinical picture combines persistent or paroxysmal hypertension, palpitations, headache, diaphoresis, tremors and/or anxiety. However, life-threatening complications, such as Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy and cardiogenic shock, have been described and are often fatal. In this setting, venoarterial-extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) might be the only way to prevent death, but only a few cases of ECMO-managed pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock have been published.

**Methods**

We reviewed the presentations and outcomes of nine patients admitted to our ICU for pheochromocytoma-induced refractory cardiogenic shock rescued by VA-ECMO between January 2007 and March 2015 (Table 1). For our literature review, the MEDLINE database was searched using “pheochromocytoma” and “cardiogenic shock” as key words. Articles were screened and those reporting cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical

circulatory support (except single intra-aortic balloon pump) were selected.

**Results**

**Case reports**

**Case 1**

A 41-year-old man consulted the emergency department (ED) for acute abdominal pain with nausea and vomiting. He had a 1-year history of hypertension and stated having had palpitations and headaches for several years. At admission, his blood pressure was 160/120 mmHg; physical examination and chest X-ray were consistent with severe pulmonary edema. His electrocardiogram indicated sinus tachycardia and ST-segment elevation in leads V1–V3. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed very severe left myocardial impairment with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 5%. Dobutamine then epinephrine infusion obtained no improvement. Under VA-ECMO implanted before he was transferred to our ICU, he rapidly recovered cardiac function, allowing ECMO weaning on day 4. Post-weaning, he developed severe hypertension that required nicardipine infusion. Abdominal ultrasonography visualized a 7-cm-diameter lesion in the right adrenal gland, confirmed by computed

<table><caption>Table 1 Clinical and biological characteristics of the nine patients</caption><thead><tr><th>Characteristic</th><th>Case 1</th><th>Case 2</th><th>Case 3</th><th>Case 4</th><th>Case 5</th><th>Case 6</th><th>Case 7</th><th>Case 8</th><th>Case 9</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Sex</td><td>Male</td><td>Female</td><td>Female</td><td>Female</td><td>Female</td><td>Female</td><td>Female</td><td>Male</td><td>Female</td></tr><tr><td>Age (years)</td><td>41</td><td>44</td><td>36</td><td>45</td><td>43</td><td>51</td><td>49</td><td>31</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>Medical history</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Palpitations/headaches/sweating/hypertension</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Yes</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td></td><td></td><td>Type 1 neurofibromatosis</td><td></td><td>Takotsubo</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Blood pressure at admission (mmHg)</td><td>160/120</td><td>180/108</td><td>157/107</td><td>130/110</td><td>140/100</td><td>130/85</td><td>141/107</td><td>160/100</td><td>129/99</td></tr><tr><td>Pre-ECMO LVEF (%)</td><td>5</td><td>20</td><td>15</td><td>20</td><td>30</td><td>20</td><td>20</td><td>30</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>Maximum troponin I (ng/L)</td><td>2200</td><td>34,000</td><td>43,000</td><td>15,000</td><td>2000</td><td>18,000</td><td>237</td><td>4994</td><td>2083</td></tr><tr><td>NT-pro-BNP at admission (ng/L)</td><td></td><td></td><td>18,363</td><td></td><td>25,282</td><td>6363</td><td>18,471</td><td></td><td>9264</td></tr><tr><td>ECMO duration (days)</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>7</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>7</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>Urinary metanephrine (N &lt; 340 µg/24 h)</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>1894</td><td>7192</td><td>8738</td><td>2862</td><td>2582</td></tr><tr><td>Urinary normetanephrine (N &lt; 440 µg/24 h)</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>ND</td><td>4973</td><td>3650</td><td>11,910</td><td>11,268</td><td>9254</td></tr><tr><td>Pheochromocytoma size (mm), side</td><td>78 x 75 x 70, right</td><td>60 mm, left</td><td>ND, autopsy</td><td>29, left</td><td>70, left</td><td>103 x 95 x 75, right</td><td>57 x 47, right</td><td>59 x 38, left</td><td>88 x 74 x 91, left</td></tr></tbody></table>

ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, N normal value, ND not done
tomography (CT). Four days after ECMO weaning, while under nicardipine infusion, labetalol and ramipril, he developed malignant hypertension (blood pressure at 270/120 mmHg) and cardiogenic shock complicated by cardiac arrest. VA-ECMO was re-implanted, but he died of refractory multiorgan failure. Autopsy confirmed the pheochromocytoma diagnosis.

### Case 2

A 44-year-old woman underwent elective hysteroscopic resection of a bleeding uterine fibroid. Her medical history included migraines, sweating episodes, appendicu- lar peritonitis in childhood and uterine fibroids. While in the recovery room, she became hypertensive (blood pressure 180/108 mmHg) and polypneic, with clinically and radiographically diagnosed pulmonary edema. TTE- estimated LVEF was 20%. Despite nitrates and diuretics, her clinical status abruptly deteriorated with cardiogenic shock, renal and hepatic failures, and hyperlactatemia (9 mmol/L). She was intubated, epinephrine infusion was started and progressively increased to 4 mg/h, and our ECMO mobile team implanted VA-ECMO. Post-implan- tation, her severe hypertension (mean blood pressure at 150 mmHg) required antihypertensive therapy. Abdomi- nal CT revealed a 6-cm tumor in the right adrenal gland. Her hemodynamic status worsened under VA-ECMO with major capillary leak syndrome requiring vascular filling; she died several hours later.

### Case 3

After 1 week of ineffective antibiotics, a 36-year-old woman was referred to her local ED for persistent febrile headaches, cough and vomiting. Her history consisted of type 1 neurofibromatosis, headaches and palpitations. At admission, her blood pressure was 157/107 mmHg and her heart rate 162 beats/min. Suddenly, she devel- oped massive pulmonary edema with cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical ventilation and dobutamine infu- sion. TTE revealed severe global hypokinesia with LVEF at 20%. She developed multiorgan failure, and our ECMO mobile team implanted VA-ECMO. On day 4, she suf- fered a massive ischemic stroke, cerebral herniation and cerebral death. During her stay, abdominal ultrasonogra- phy found a left adrenal tumor; autopsy confirmed a left adrenal pheochromocytoma.

### Case 4

After 2 weeks of antibiotics and corticosteroids for bron- chitis, a 45-year-old woman went to her local ED for acute chest pain. She had no remarkable medical history. At admission, BP was 130/110 mmHg, her heart rate was 86 beats/min, and oxygen saturation was 98% breathing ambient air. She rapidly developed signs of respiratory

and hemodynamic failure, and mechanical ventilation was started. Her electrocardiogram indicated sinus tach- ycardia and ST-segment elevation in leads V2–V3. TTE revealed severe LV dysfunction with LVEF at 20%. Refractory electrical storm ensued, requiring VA-ECMO implantation by the ECMO mobile team after 45 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Peripheral ECMO was switched to central ECMO during her ICU stay. Car- diac biopsies taken during the switch contained fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltration without necrosis, sugges- tive of borderline myocarditis. Heart function recovered and ECMO was removed 7 days post-implantation. After 5 weeks in ICU complicated by ischemic stroke, she was discharged from the hospital. Several months later, a CT scan for abdominal pain visualized an adrenal mass, whose radiologic appearance suggested pheochromocy- toma. She underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy under stable hemodynamic conditions; histologic examination of the mass confirmed the pheochromocytoma diagnosis.

### Case 5

A 43-year-old woman went to her ED for acute chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea and vomiting a few hours after dental care. She had been hospitalized 8 months earlier for acute coronary syndrome with normal coro- nary angiography after mammoplasty, and 4 months ago for Takotsubo syndrome following dental care. At admis- sion, her BP was 140/100 mmHg and pulse rate 97/min. Acute respiratory distress required immediate mechani- cal ventilation. Her electrocardiogram revealed nega- tive T waves on lateral leads. Troponin I was at 2 µg/L. TTE found severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF at 20%), with apical ballooning. Despite infused dobutamine and epinephrine (gradually increased to 15 mg/h), circula- tory failure worsened and femoral–femoral VA-ECMO was implanted. Within few hours, the patient's hemo- dynamics improved and, after discontinuing catechola- mine infusion, a hypertensive crisis occurred. Abdominal ultrasonography discovered a 7-cm left adrenal lesion confirmed by CT. ECMO was removed on day 3 with full recovery of heart systolic function; α- and β-blockers (prazosin and atenolol) were started. Six weeks after admission, she underwent uncomplicated adrenalec- tomy; histologic examination of the mass confirmed the pheochromocytoma diagnosis.

### Case 6

A 51-year-old woman, with no remarkable medical his- tory, underwent elective abdominal hernia repair. During surgery, she developed hypertensive cardiogenic pulmo- nary edema. TTE revealed Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, with LV apical akinesis and LVEF at 25%. Her electro- cardiogram indicated ST-segment depression on lateral
leads. Inotropic support was ineffective, and VA-ECMO was implanted. Abdominal CT showed a 10-cm-diameter lesion in the right adrenal gland with central necrosis. Elevated urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine, and scintigraphy with metaiodobenzylguanidine confirmed the pheochromocytoma diagnosis. Prazosin (α-blocker) was initiated, and she was weaned off ECMO on day 3. During hospitalization, she developed numerous hypertensive crises that were controlled medically. The lesion/mass was successfully excised 6 weeks post-admission. Histology of the surgical specimen confirmed necrotic pheochromocytoma. The patient was well at 3-year follow-up.

### Case 7

A 49-year-old woman, with no remarkable medical history, had fever, cough and myalgia of 2-week duration. She was referred to the ED for acute dyspnea and circulatory failure. At admission, her blood pressure was 120/100 mmHg, pulse 137/min and severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema required rapid intubation. TTE-measured LVEF was at 20%. Antibiotics and oseltamivir were started for suspected fulminant myocarditis. Despite maximal inotropic support, adequate perfusion could not be achieved and femoral-femoral VA-ECMO was implanted, complicated a few hours later by acute right inferior limb ischemia with compartment syndrome. On day 2, partial hemodynamic improvement allowed ECMO removal and right limb aponeurotomy. Abdominal ultrasonography visualized a large right adrenal mass. LV systolic function recovered fully. Antihypertensive medications (prazosin and β-blockers) were started. Right adrenalectomy was performed 6 weeks later; histologic examination of the mass confirmed the pheochromocytoma diagnosis.

### Case 8

A 31-year-old man consulted his local ED for palpitations, and headaches associated with chest and abdominal pain. During the preceding year, he had experienced episodic headaches, sweating and palpitations. At physical examination BP was 160/100 mmHg, pulse 160/min, temperature 38.5 °C. His electrocardiogram indicated ST-segment depression in inferior-lateral leads, and troponin I was at 4994 ng/L. Emergency coronary artery angiography was normal. His respiratory and hemodynamic status worsened, necessitating mechanical ventilation and hemodynamic support. TTE showed severe LV hypokinesia with LVEF at 30%. VA-ECMO was implanted for refractory cardiogenic shock. Abdominal CT discovered a 5-cm left adrenal mass. Prazosin was started and controlled hemodynamic variations. ECMO was removed 7 days post-implantation. The patient

underwent surgery 6 weeks later and was discharged in good condition.

### Case 9

Two days after the onset of flu-like symptoms, a 47-year-old woman with a history of morbid obesity and depression went to the ED for abdominal pain, vomiting and myalgia. Physical examination found temperature at 38.4 °C, BP 129/99 mmHg, pulse 138/min, respiratory rate 24/min and initial oxygen saturation 97% breathing ambient air, but the rapid deterioration of her respiratory and hemodynamic status required oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation. Her echocardiography revealed severe LV dysfunction, with apical thrombosis. Troponin I was at 2083 ng/L. Despite inotropic support, her hemodynamics worsened and VA-ECMO was implanted. Hemodynamics quickly improved, and ECMO was removed on day 4. She suffered an embolic stroke that caused left hemiplegia. Abdominal CT showed a multinodular formation near the left adrenal gland, whose enhancement and density were compatible with a paraganglioma. She was started on α- and β-blockers and discharged to a neurologic rehabilitation center. Her tumor was excised 4 months later; histology confirmed a voluminous paraganglioma.

## Literature review

We conducted a systematic MEDLINE database literature review through the PubMed search engine, between 2000 and 2016, using the following criteria: pheochromocytoma and cardiogenic shock, pheochromocytoma and ECMO, pheochromocytoma and mechanical circulatory support, Takotsubo and cardiogenic shock, adrenergic cardiomyopathy and cardiogenic shock. We also searched the references of identified studies. Observational studies and case series reporting on adult patients having required mechanical circulatory support for pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock were eligible. Studies on children or newborns, those without any outcome information, were excluded.

Two authors (G.H. and N.B.) independently reviewed the retrieved abstracts and assessed eligibility. A third author (C.E.L.) determined eligibility in the case of disagreement.

The following data were extracted: study design, participants' characteristics (including echocardiographic data), type of mechanical circulatory support, outcome data (hospital mortality).

Forty cases of patients suffering from pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support (except use of intra-aortic balloon pump alone) were reported in the literature (Table 2). Twenty (50%) were women, and their median age was
<table><caption>Table 2 Case reports of pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support</caption><thead><tr><th>First author</th><th>Year</th><th>Patients with cardiac assist device, n</th><th>Mean age (years)</th><th>Sex</th><th>Initial LVEF (%)</th><th>Mechanical circulatory support; duration (days)</th><th>ICU-admission -to-surgery interval (days)</th><th>Hospital survival</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Takagi [17]</td><td>2000</td><td>1</td><td>52</td><td>M</td><td>9</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 3</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Grinda [18]</td><td>2006</td><td>1</td><td>49</td><td>M</td><td>12</td><td>ECMO, then LVAD; 4, then 70, respectively</td><td>4</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Ouchikhe [19]</td><td>2006</td><td>1</td><td>23</td><td>M</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO, then Thoratec BiVAD; 84</td><td>93</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Kim [20]</td><td>2007</td><td>1</td><td>47</td><td>M</td><td>23</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 10</td><td>15</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Chao [21]</td><td>2008</td><td>1</td><td>42</td><td>M</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 7</td><td>18</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Zegdi [22]</td><td>2008</td><td>1</td><td>51</td><td>F</td><td>30</td><td>ECMO; 6</td><td>30</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Huang [23]</td><td>2008</td><td>3</td><td>25</td><td>F</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 4</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>42</td><td>M</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 7</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>41</td><td>F</td><td>&lt;NR</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 2</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Grasselli [24]</td><td>2008</td><td>1</td><td>47</td><td>F</td><td>30</td><td>ECMO; 4</td><td>7</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Suh [25]</td><td>2008</td><td>1</td><td>43</td><td>M</td><td>27</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 4</td><td>56</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Wu [26]</td><td>2008</td><td>2</td><td>42</td><td>M</td><td>34</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 8</td><td>21</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>40</td><td>M</td><td>30</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 4</td><td>12</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Newton [27]</td><td>2008</td><td>1</td><td>45</td><td>M</td><td>10</td><td>CBP to facilitate pheochromocytoma surgery; 1</td><td>1</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Park [28]</td><td>2009</td><td>1</td><td>41</td><td>M</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 2</td><td>30</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Westaby [12]</td><td>2009</td><td>1</td><td>27</td><td>M</td><td>15</td><td>CBP and adrenalectomy, then LVAD; 6</td><td>1</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Raikhelkar [29]</td><td>2010</td><td>1</td><td>38</td><td>M</td><td>5</td><td>Thoratec BiVAD; 4</td><td>24</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Xeridat [25]</td><td>2011</td><td>1</td><td>16</td><td>F</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO; 6</td><td>21</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Ritter [30]</td><td>2011</td><td>1</td><td>49</td><td>F</td><td>10</td><td>ECMO; 8</td><td>8</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Nakajima [31]</td><td>2011</td><td>1</td><td>33</td><td>F</td><td>19</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 4</td><td>120</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Contargyris [32]</td><td>2012</td><td>1</td><td>20</td><td>M</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO; 2</td><td>30</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Sojod [33]</td><td>2012</td><td>1</td><td>37</td><td>F</td><td>15</td><td>ECMO; 11</td><td>21</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Sheinberg [34]</td><td>2012</td><td>1</td><td>45</td><td>F</td><td>5</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 3</td><td>56</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Noorani [35]</td><td>2012</td><td>1</td><td>39</td><td>F</td><td>NR</td><td>Central ECMO; 5</td><td>3</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Banfi [36]</td><td>2012</td><td>1</td><td>20</td><td>F</td><td>20</td><td>Central ECMO; 6</td><td>120</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Kaese [37]</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>43</td><td>M</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO; 9</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Law [38]</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>23</td><td>F</td><td>5</td><td>ECMO; 1</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Shawa [39]</td><td>2014</td><td>1</td><td>38</td><td>F</td><td>15</td><td>Tandem Heart; 1</td><td>26</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Riester [1]</td><td rowspan="2">2015</td><td rowspan="2">2</td><td>18</td><td>F</td><td>NR</td><td>Impella; 2</td><td>No surgery</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>F</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO; NR</td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Chao [2]</td><td rowspan="4">2015</td><td rowspan="4">4, 2 with IABP<sup>a</sup></td><td>25</td><td>F</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO<sup>a</sup></td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>52</td><td>M</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO<sup>a</sup></td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>40</td><td>M</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO<sup>a</sup></td><td>NR, after ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>65</td><td>M</td><td>NR</td><td>ECMO<sup>a</sup></td><td>Refused surgery</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Zhou [40]</td><td>2015</td><td>1</td><td>35</td><td>M</td><td>20</td><td>ECMO and IABP during cardiac paraganglioma resection; 16</td><td>Cardiac paraganglioma resection, date unknown</td><td>Yes</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 2 continued**</caption><thead><tr><th>First author</th><th>Year</th><th>Patients with cardiac assist device, n</th><th>Mean age (years)</th><th>Sex</th><th>Initial LVEF (%)</th><th>Mechanical circulatory support; duration (days)</th><th>ICU-admission-to-surgery interval (days)</th><th>Hospital survival</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Flam [10]</td><td>2015</td><td>1</td><td>46</td><td>F</td><td>15</td><td>ECMO; 5</td><td>66</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Vagner [41]</td><td>2015</td><td>1</td><td>55</td><td>F</td><td>15</td><td>Impella, then ECLS; 2</td><td>56</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Spangenberg [14]</td><td>2015</td><td>1</td><td>29</td><td>F</td><td>10</td><td>ECMO and IABP; 1</td><td>No surgery</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Kodama [9]</td><td>2016</td><td>1</td><td>37</td><td>F</td><td>10</td><td>ECMO; NR</td><td>NR, before ECMO weaning</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Dang Van [42]</td><td>2016</td><td>1</td><td>57</td><td>M</td><td>10</td><td>ECMO, 7</td><td>NR, concomitant from the ECMO implantation</td><td>Yes</td></tr></tbody></table>

IABP intra-aortic balloon pump, NR not reported, CPB cardiopulmonary bypass, LVAD left ventricular assist device, BiVAD biventricular assist device, ECLS extracorporeal life support

40 years (IQR 31–49 years). Left ventricular dysfunction was very severe in all cases with a median LVEF of 15% (IQR 10–20%). ECMO was used in 35 patients, 2 patients had Impella device, 1 had Tandem Heart device, 2 had cardiopulmonary bypass to facilitate pheochromocytoma surgery, and 4 patients had long-term mechanical circulatory support. Median duration of mechanical circulatory support was 4 days (IQR 1.5–6.5 days). Pheochromocytoma was removed surgically after mechanical circulatory support weaning in 29 patients and while on mechanical circulatory support in 7. Two patients died before surgery, one patient declined, and the timing of surgery was not reported in the last case. The median ICU-admission-to-surgery interval was 23 days (IQR 1–46 days). Thirty-seven of the 40 (93%) reported cases survived.

## Discussion

We described nine critical presentations of undiagnosed pheochromocytoma with refractory cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO salvage therapy.

Many cardiac manifestations of pheochromocytoma have been reported, including Takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema and/or hypertensive crisis [1], but only rarely inaugural refractory cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO (Table 2). This is, to our knowledge, the largest case series of pheochromocytoma-induced refractory cardiogenic shock. As previously reported [1, 2], the major clinical feature was the sequence of initial hypertensive crisis followed by hypotensive shock, probably caused by severe LV failure. Following ECMO implantation, all our patients suffered paroxysmal hypertension with wide and rapid blood pressure fluctuations.

Coronary angiography should be considered in every patient with unexplained cardiogenic shock, especially in cases of ST-segment deviation. It was performed in

patient 8, and patient 5 had a normal coronary catheterization a few months ago. In our study, the other patients did not have this examination because three had a clinical presentation highly suggestive of myocarditis and four had clinical characteristics suggestive of pheochromocytoma with early diagnosis performed on abdominal imaging.

Cardiogenic shock is a rare but potentially lethal pheochromocytoma manifestation, and in our series, three of the nine patients died. For the six survivors, mechanical circulatory support was probably the only way to prevent death. Because ECMO allows quick and easy percutaneous insertion of cannulae, full circulatory support and improved tissue oxygenation in situations of cardiogenic shock combined with severe pulmonary edema [3, 4], it was preferred over other assisted support options for all these patients. Pertinently, cardiac dysfunction reversibility in these pheochromocytoma-induced cardiomyopathies is well established; all six survivors were all weaned off ECMO within a week and recovered normal myocardial systolic function.

Catecholamine-mediated cardiomyopathy is not completely understood. Proposed mechanisms include coronary artery or microvascular spasms leading to focal myocardial necrosis [5], direct cellular toxicity through increased intracellular calcium concentrations [6] or damage induced by reactive oxygen species [7], and myocardial stunning due to receptor desensitization and/or downregulation [8]. When obtained, endomyocardial biopsies contained nonspecific contraction band necrosis [9]. Our patient 4's suspected myocarditis biopsy contained lymphocytic infiltration and focal fibrosis, without necrosis.

In reported cases [10] and our experience, once the initial critical context has been controlled, heart failure is fully reversible within a few days, suggesting stunning or metabolic anomaly rather than myocardial necrosis.

<footnote>ª Chao et al. did not specify which two patients had ECMO and IABP and individual ECMO durations were not given</footnote>
Medical management of pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock raises some concerns. Various drugs, including adrenaline, noradrenaline, dobutamine, vasoressin and levosimendan, were used in case reports. Because exposure to elevated epinephrine levels may engender cardiac dysfunction and sympathetic receptor downregulation, catecholamines usually used to treat cardiogenic shock could be less effective or even exacerbate pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock. Some authors proposed alternative agents that do not act via adrenergic receptors, such as calcium-sensitizing agents or phosphodiesterase III inhibitors, but no available evidence supports those decisions [11, 12].

Cardiogenic shock was the first main manifestation of undiagnosed pheochromocytoma for most of our patients, but some clinical manifestations could help guide the diagnosis. The major characteristic was hypertension at admission contrasting with evidence of circulatory failure. Symptoms suggestive of pheochromocytoma, e.g., headaches, sweating and palpitations, were retrospectively found in four patients, one had type 1 neurofibromatosis, and one had experienced two Takotsubo cardiomyopathy episodes. During recovery, four of them developed severe paroxysmal hypertension, also evocative of pheochromocytoma.

Precipitating circumstances were identified for some patients. Three relatively asymptomatic patients' previously undiagnosed pheochromocytomas were unmasked by elective surgery, manifesting as peri- or postoperative hypertensive crises and subsequent cardiogenic shock. Johnston et al. described two similar patients with hypertensive crises and cardiogenic shock unmasked by elective surgical procedures [11]. In such perioperative situations, acute intra-tumor hemorrhagic necrosis may precipitate catecholamine release, thereby inducing acute cardiogenic shock. Four patients had flu-like symptoms (fever, cough, myalgia) and acute heart failure with LV dysfunction and pulmonary edema, suggestive of myocarditis [13]. This particular clinical picture of pheochromocytoma mimicking fulminant myocarditis has been described previously [14] and should be known to physicians.

For our patients, pheochromocytoma was diagnosed based on abdominal CT or ultrasonography and then confirmed by elevated urinary catecholamines. Pheochromocytoma diagnosis usually relies on measuring plasma or urine metanephrines. However, cardiogenic shock and hypertensive crisis can physiologically increase catecholamine release and these patients frequently receive adrenaline or noradrenaline infusions. For those two reasons, metanephrine levels cannot be used in this setting to diagnose pheochromocytoma. As Amar and Eisenhofer suggested, this situation requires immediate

imaging studies to search for a pheochromocytoma without prior biochemical evidence of a catecholamine-producing tumor [15].

A difficult issue is the optimal timing of pheochromocytoma excision. In a recent retrospective cohort study and literature review, emergency surgery during hypertensive crisis was associated with higher mortality and morbidity [16]. Stabilization with α-blockade prior to elective surgery was associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative complications. It seems useful to minimize the risk of catecholamine-induced hemodynamic fluctuations during anesthesia or pre-ablation tumor mobilization during surgery. Calcium channel blockers may be added, if necessary.

In our case series, α-blockers were gradually introduced in hemodynamically stabilized patients, followed by β-blockers to prevent tachycardia once cardiac systolic function had recovered and ECMO had been removed.

Five survivors underwent adrenalectomy 3 weeks to 4 months after the initial emergency presentation; the sixth pheochromocytoma was diagnosed 1 year later and removed under stable conditions and without perioperative complications. Celioscopic adrenalectomy was achievable in the six patients once heart function had fully recovered. None of these patients experienced another severe hypertensive crisis on α- and β-blockers before surgery. All six have been asymptomatic since the intervention.

As compared to previously reported cases, we described nine consecutive patients whereas most reported cases were single cases. Our patients were globally similar to previously reported cases: They shared same clinical characteristics and same short duration of ECMO support, and most adrenalectomy procedures were delayed after myocardial recovery. Contrasting with the good outcome (37/40 patients survived) of the previously reported patients, three of our nine patients died. This could be explained by publication bias related to single case reports; authors report most often successes than failures. Clinicians should be aware of this rare but curable cause of cardiogenic shock; it can be suspected in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with hypertension and easily confirmed using abdominal imaging. Moreover, we describe here a homogenous and successful single-center strategy for pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock management from the initial critical presentation to the scheduled adrenalectomy after heart recovery.

## Conclusion

Pheochromocytoma should systematically be considered for patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, perioperative hypertensive crisis and/or unexplained
cardiogenic shock. The definitive diagnosis is based on characteristic clinical features and abdominal imaging. For the most severe cases, ECMO support can be a life-saving therapy, allowing myocardial recovery within a few days. After hemodynamic stabilization, treatment should include α-blockade, with elective pheochromocytoma removal scheduled after myocardial recovery under stable conditions.

**Authors' contributions**

GH, FK, GL, NB, MS, CG, XG, CT, PL, JLT, JC, AC and CEL conceived the study. GH, FK and CEL wrote the manuscript. GH, FK, GL, NB, MS, CG, XG, CT, PL, JLT, JC, AC and CEL reviewed, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

**Author details**

¹ Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Cardiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. ² UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. ³ Institute of Endocrinology, Pierre et Marie Curie Sorbonne Université, APHP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

⁴ Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Pierre et Marie Curie Sorbonne Université, APHP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. ⁵ Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Pierre et Marie Curie Sorbonne Université, APHP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

**Competing interests**

Dr. Combes is the primary investigator of the EOLIA trial (NCT01470703), a randomized trial ofVV-ECMO supported in part by MAQUET. Drs. Bréchot, Schmidt, Lebreton and Combes have received honoraria for lectures by MAQUET. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Consent to publish**

Consent to publish has been obtained from the participants or their legal parents to report individual patients' data.

Received: 17 August 2016 Accepted: 21 November 2016

Published online: 28 November 2016

**References**

1. Riester A, Weismann D, Quinkler M, Lichtenauer UD, Sommerey S, Halbritter R, et al. Life-threatening events in patients with pheochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol/Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 2015;173(6):757-64.

2. Chao A, Wang C-H, You H-C, Chou N-K, Yu H-Y, Chi N-H, et al. Highlighting Indication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in endocrine emergencies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13361.

3. Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(3):156-67.

4. Muller G, Flecher E, Lebreton G, Luyt C-E, Trouillet J-L, Bréchot N, et al. The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(3):370-8.

5. Simons M, Downing SE. Coronary vasoconstriction and catecholamine cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 1985;109(2):297-304.

6. Opie LH, Walpoth B, Barsacchi R. Calcium and catecholamines: relevance to cardiomyopathies and significance in therapeutic strategies. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1985;17(Suppl 2):21-34.

7. Costa VM, Carvalho F, Bastos ML, Carvalho RA, Carvalho M, Remião F. Contribution of catecholamine reactive intermediates and oxidative stress to the pathologic features of heart diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(15):2272-314.

8. Rosenbaum JS, Billingham ME, Ginsburg R, Tsujimoto G, Lurie KG, Hoffman BB. Cardiomyopathy in a rat model of pheochromocytoma. Morphological and functional alterations. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1988;1(3):389-99.

9. Kodama T, Agozzino M, Pellegrini C, Narula N, Pietrabissa A, Concardi M, et al. Endomyocardial Biopsy in acute cardiogenic shock: diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:897-9.

10. Flam B, Broomé M, Frenckner B, Bränström R, Bell M. Pheochromocytoma-induced inverted takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy leading to cardiogenic shock successfully treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30(6):365-72.

11. Johnston PC, Silversides JA, Wallace H, Farling PA, Hutchinson A, Hunter SJ, et al. Phaeochromocytoma crisis: two cases of undiagnosed phaeochromocytoma presenting after elective nonrelated surgical procedures. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2013;2013:514714.

12. Westaby S, Shahir A, Sadler G, Flynn F, Ormerod O. Mechanical bridge to recovery in pheochromocytoma myocarditis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(7):482-7.

13. Mirabel M, Luyt C-E, Leprince P, Trouillet J-L, Léger P, Pavie A, et al. Outcomes, long-term quality of life, and psychologic assessment of fulminant myocarditis patients rescued by mechanical circulatory support. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(5):1029-35.

14. Spangenberg T, Freker C, Niggemann C, Reißmann B, Meincke F, van der Schalk H, et al. Differential diagnosis of a fulminant myocarditis: the pheochromocytoma crisis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(6):577-8.

15. Amar L, Eisenhofer G. Diagnosing phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma in a patient presenting with critical illness: biochemistry versus imaging. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83(3):298-302.

16. Scholten A, Cisco RM, Vriens MR, Cohen JK, Mitmaker EJ, Liu C, et al. pheochromocytoma crisis is not a surgical emergency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):581-91.

17. Takagi S, Miyazaki S, Fujii T, Daikoku S, Sutani Y, Morii I, et al. Dexamethasone-induced cardiogenic shock rescued by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Jpn Circ J. 2000;64(10):785-8.

18. Grinda J-M, Bricourt M-O, Salvi S, Carlier M, Grossenbacher F, Brasselet C, et al. Unusual cardiogenic shock due to pheochromocytoma: recovery after bridge-to-bridge (extracorporeal life support and DeBakey ventricular assist device) and right surrenalectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(4):913-4.

19. Ouchikhe A, Lehoux P, Gringore A, Renouf P, Deredec R, Tasle M, et al. Phaeochromocytoma as an unusual aetiology of cardiogenic shock. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim. 2006;25(1):46-9.

20. Kim HS, Chang WI, Kim YC, Yi SY, Kil JS, Hahn J-Y, et al. Catecholamine cardiomyopathy associated with paraganglioma rescued by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support: inverted Takotsubo contractile pattern. Circ J. 2007;71(12):1993-5.

21. Chao A, Yeh YC, Yen TS, Chen YS. Phaeochromocytoma crisis—a rare indication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(1):86-8.

22. Zegdi R, Parisot C, Sleilaty G, Deloche A, Fabiani J-N. Pheochromocytoma-induced inverted Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a case of patient resuscitation with extracorporeal life support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(2):434-5.

23. Huang J-H, Huang S-C, Chou N-K, Ko W-J, Chen Y-S, Wang S-S. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue for cardiopulmonary collapse secondary to pheochromocytoma: report of three cases. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(8):1551-2.

24. Grasselli G, Foti G, Patroniti N, Rona R, Perlangeli MV, Pesenti A. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support for cardiogenic shock caused by pheochromocytoma: a case report and literature review. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(5):959-62.

25. Suh I-W, Lee CW, Kim Y-H, Hong M-K, Lee J-W, Kim J-J, et al. Catastrophic catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy mimicking acute myocardial infarction, rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pheochromocytoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23(2):350-4.

26. Wu X-M, Chen J-J, Wu C-K, Lin L-Y, Tseng C-D. Pheochromocytoma presenting as acute myocarditis with cardiogenic shock in two cases. Intern Med. 2008;47(24):2151-5.

27. Newton JD, Munir S, Bhindi R, Ormerod O. What a headache: rare neuroendocrine indication for cardiopulmonary bypass for severe left ventricular dysfunction and shock. Circ Heart Fail. 2008;1(2):143-5.

28. Park S-M, Kim D-H, Kwak Y-T, Jeong I-K, Cho J-M, Jin E-S, et al. Pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock rescued by percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass system. Circ J. 2009;73(9):1753-5.
29. Raikhelkar J, Anyanwu A, Gist RS, Somal J, Mechanick JI, Scher C, et al. Pheochromocytoma presenting as severe biventricular failure requiring insertion of a biventricular assist device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(6):985-7.

30. Ritter S, Guertler T, Meier CA, Genoni M. Cardiogenic shock due to pheochromocytoma rescued by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13(1):112-3.

31. Nakajima Y, Masaoka N, Sodeyama M, Tsuduki Y, Sakai M. Pheochromocytoma-related cardiomyopathy during the antepartum period in a preterm pregnant woman. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(7):908-11.

32. Contargyris C, Nee L, Saby C, Kerbaul F, Peytel E. Phaeochromocytoma revealed by a cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support. Ann Fr Anesth Rèanim. 2012;31(12):965-8.

33. Sojod G, Diana M, Wall J, D'Agostino J, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment for pheochromocytoma-induced acute cardiac failure. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(6):1017. e1-3.

34. Sheinberg R, Gao WD, Wand G, Abraham S, Schulick R, Roy R, et al. Case 1—2012. A perfect storm: fatality resulting from metoclopramide unmasking a pheochromocytoma and its management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26(1):161-5.

35. Noorani A, Vuylsteke A, Lewis C, Parameshwar J, Catarino P. A moribund athlete. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):74.

36. Banfi C, Juthier F, Ennezat P-V, de Saint Denis T, Carnaille B, Leteurtre E, et al. Central extracorporeal life support in pheochromocytoma crisis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1303-5.

37. Kaese S, Schülke C, Fischer D, Lebiedz P. Pheochromocytoma-induced takotsubo-like cardiomyopathy and global heart failure with need for extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(8):1473-4.

38. Law C, Khaliq A, Guglin M. Reversible cardiogenic shock due to catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy: a variant of takotsubo? Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(11):1621.e1-3.

39. Shawa H, Bajaj M, Cunningham GR. Pheochromocytoma-induced atrial tachycardia leading to cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: resolution with atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker placement. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014;41(6):660-3.

40. Zhou X, Liu D, Su L, Long Y, Du W, Miao Q, et al. Pheochromocytoma crisis with severe cyclic blood pressure fluctuations in a cardiac pheochromocytoma patient successfully resuscitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(17):e790.

41. Vagner H, Hey TM, Elle B, Jensen MK. Embolisation of pheochromocytoma to stabilise and wean a patient in cardiogenic shock from emergency extracorporeal life support. BMJ Case Rep. 2015. pii: bcr2014206069.

42. Van Dang S, Hamy A, Hubert N, Fouquet O. Cardiogenic shock induced by a voluminous phaeochromocytoma rescued by concomitant extracorporeal life support and open left adrenalectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(4):782-3.

Submit your manuscript to a **SpringerOpen**® journal and benefit from:

► Convenient online submission

► Rigorous peer review

► Immediate publication on acceptance

► Open access: articles freely available online

► High visibility within the field

► Retaining the copyright to your article

Submit your next manuscript at ► springeropen.com