# Citrullination in the pathology of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders: recent advances and future perspectives

Oskar Ciesielski, Marta Biesiekierska, Baptiste Panthu, Miroslaw Soszyński, Luciano Pirola, Aneta Balcerczyk

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Oskar Ciesielski, Marta Biesiekierska, Baptiste Panthu, Miroslaw Soszyński, Luciano Pirola, et al. Citrullination in the pathology of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders: recent advances and future perspectives. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2022, 79 (2), pp.94. 10.1007/s00018-022-04126-3. hal-03557707

HAL Id: hal-03557707

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03557707

Submitted on 4 Feb 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Citrullination in the pathology of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders: recent advances and future perspectives

Oskar Ciesielski<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> · Marta Biesiekierska<fnref n="1" /> · Baptiste Panthu<fnref n="3" /> · Mirosław Soszyński<fnref n="1" /> · Luciano Pirola<fnref n="3" /> · Aneta Balcerczyk<fnref n="1" />

Received: 7 August 2021 / Revised: 29 December 2021 / Accepted: 3 January 2022

© The Author(s) 2022

## Abstract

Numerous post-translational modifications (PTMs) govern the collective metabolism of a cell through altering the structure and functions of proteins. The action of the most prevalent PTMs, encompassing phosphorylation, methylation, acylations, ubiquitination and glycosylation is well documented. A less explored protein PTM, conversion of peptidylarginine to citrulline, is the subject of this review. The process of citrullination is catalysed by peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs), a family of conserved enzymes expressed in a variety of human tissues. Accumulating evidence suggest that citrullination plays a significant role in regulating cellular metabolism and gene expression by affecting a multitude of pathways and modulating the chromatin status. Here, we will discuss the biochemical nature of arginine citrullination, the enzymatic machinery behind it and also provide information on the pathological consequences of citrullination in the development of inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus, periodontitis and COVID-19), cancer and thromboembolism. Finally, developments on inhibitors against protein citrullination and recent clinical trials providing a promising therapeutic approach to inflammatory disease by targeting citrullination are discussed.

**Keywords** Immune disorders · COVID-19 · Cancer · Peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs) · Anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPAs) · Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)

## Introduction

Post-translational modifications of histone and non-histone proteins include covalent changes taking place on the amino acid side chain leading to the addition of a chemical group, such as acetyl, methyl, phosphoryl, glycosyl, which significantly change the properties of a protein, its conformation, localization and stability, and help to diversify the protein's functionalities [1, 2]. In addition to the above-mentioned

protein PTMs, particular attention has been given to peptidyl-arginine citrullination, that was found to be an important factor in regulation of the gene expression machinery and, consequently, a regulator of many physiological processes including skin keratinisation, plasticity of the central nervous system or regulation of the immune reactions, by affecting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation [3, 4]. Citrullination has been also identified as a potential therapeutic target, as conversion of peptidyl-arginine to peptidyl-citrulline plays an important role in promoting tumorigenesis and autoimmunity [5–7]. Recent studies have also shown an association between protein arginine citrullination and COVID-19 severity [8–10].

This review presents the recent advances in the field of protein citrullination and the role of this modification in immune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus, periodontitis and COVID-19. We survey the current-state-of-the-art regarding the enzymes catalysing the reaction, as well as their substrates. We review the identified citrullinated peptide epitopes that are proposed as disease markers,

<footnote>Aneta Balcerczyk
aneta.balcerczyk@biol.uni.lodz.pl</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² The Bio-Med-Chem Doctoral School, University of Lodz and Lodz Institutes of the Polish Academy of Sciences, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM Unit 1060, Lyon 1 University, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, BP12, 69495 Pierre Bénite Cedex, France</footnote>
specifically recognized in certain human autoimmune disorders, and discuss the diagnostic features and potential therapeutic value of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies based on ongoing clinical trials.

## Methodology of literature search

Literature search strategy: Medline and Scopus databases were surveyed for original articles and literature reviews with the following keywords and terms, used alone or in combination: *citrullination*, *deimination*, *citrulline*, *peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD)*, *autoimmune disorders*, *rheumatoid arthritis*, *multiple sclerosis*, *systemic lupus erythematosus*, *periodontitis*, *psoriasis*, *inflammatory bowel disease*, *COVID-19*, *ACPA*, *NET*, *NET formation*, *NET disorders*, *therapeutic potential*, *anti-citrullination therapy*, *PAD inhibitors*. Adequate clinical trials were searched in the NIH clinical trials register (clinicaltrials.gov) and in The European Council EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu).

## Biochemistry of the citrullination process

Protein citrullination is an irreversible PTM, and refers to the process of conversion of peptidyl-arginine (pArg) to peptidyl-citrulline (pCit). The reaction, known also as deimination, was first described in 1958 by Rogers and Simmonds [11]. As citrulline is not one of the 20 primary amino acids encoded by DNA, pCit only occurs in proteins following pArg deimination. Citrulline is also a metabolite of the urea cycle, the metabolic pathway mediating the detoxification of ammonia into urea, secreted in the urine [12]. Protein citrullination is catalysed by the peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) enzyme family [13]. The reaction is, at present, considered to be an irreversible process, as no evidence for the existence of a de-citrullination reaction has been reported

yet. However, as it was the case with protein methylation, which was initially considered as an irreversible protein PTM prior to the discovery of histone demethylases, a group of decitrullinating enzymes may have yet to be discovered [14]. The chemical mechanism of the deimination reaction is based on a primary ketimine group being replaced by a ketone group, resulting in the loss of the positive charge of arginine and production of ammonia. In contrast to positively charged arginine, citrulline is neutral (Fig. 1) [15].

The loss of a positive charge caused by citrullination results in electrostatic and conformational changes of the modified protein, affecting its function by altering binding sites, protein-protein interaction and susceptibility to degradation [15, 16]. Citrullination substantially lowers the amino acid isoelectric point, from 11.41 for arginine to 5.91 for citrulline, thus affecting the acidity of the protein and its potential to form hydrogen bonds and inter amino acid electrostatic interactions (Fig. 2) [17].

The human “citrullinome” includes hundreds of proteins, some of the best known being (i) structural proteins: keratin, fibronectin, actin, tubulin, vimentin and (ii) proteins found in chromatin, notably histones [3]. Recently, protein citrullination has gained much of scientific interest, because of its role in several important biological processes, including skin keratinization, myelin formation and gene expression regulation [4, 5]. One of the best studied processes where citrullination plays a central role is the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), the immune system’s first line of defence against infections. While physiological arginine citrullination does occur in the regulation of many physiological pathways, because of its drastic effects on protein-protein interactions and epitope changes, dysregulated arginine citrullination may contribute to the development of severe pathological states [18]. Increased PAD activity, and thus increased protein citrullination, is strongly linked with the occurrence of autoimmune-mediated inflammatory

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Enzymatic conversion of positively charged arginine into neutral citrulline</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** The effects of citrullination on protein-protein interactions</figcaption></figure>

responses such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [19]. Moreover, recent reports suggest that excessive protein citrullination may also play a crucial role in non-autoimmune inflammatory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or other inflammatory-linked conditions such as: thrombosis, atherosclerosis, psoriasis, cancer and Alzheimer disease [4]. The link between PAD activity and excessive inflammatory response is discussed in detail in the following sections.

**Peptidylarginine deiminases: structure, function and tissue expression**

Peptidylarginine deiminases or protein arginine deiminases (PADs), first reported in 1977, belong to the cysteine hydrolases enzyme family (EC 3.5.3.15). PADs drive arginine deimination via a nucleophilic attack of the active site cysteine on the arginine's guanidinium group, leading to the formation of an intermediate acyl-enzyme which is then hydrolyzed to citrulline [13]. There are five known isotypes of PADs: PAD1, PAD2, PAD3, PAD4 and PAD6, with PAD6 being catalytically inactive, that are distributed in a myriad of human cell types showing a highly tissue-specific expression pattern and consequently perform various functions. All the human PAD isozymes have a length ranging from 663 to 694 amino acids, a molecular weight around 74 kDa and share 70-95% homology within their sequences [13], UniProtKB database]. The overall structure of PADs is composed of two N-terminal immunoglobulin-like domains with regulatory function which are connected

to a C-terminal catalytic domain. PAD2 and PAD4 crystalize as homodimers with the two holoenzyme's active sites exposed on the same face of the dimer [20, 21]. The PADs active site contains a conserved nucleophilic cysteine (C645 in PAD1 and 4; C647 in PAD2; C646 in PAD3), a conserved histidine (H471) and two aspartates (D350 and D473). The cysteine and histidine residues are the two catalytic residues, with the two aspartates acting to stabilize the positively charged peptidyl-arginine substrate between the active site cysteine and histidine. PADs contain 4 (PAD1), 5 (PAD3, 4) and 6 (PAD2) Ca²⁺ binding sites, and these are crucial for PADs catalytic activity, as calcium increases PAD activity by > 10,000 fold. Ca²⁺ binding at these sites leads to a series of conformational changes that induce a catalytically competent active site [22].

Only PAD2 and PAD4 isozymes contain a nuclear localization signal, targeting them to the nucleus where they deiminate histones H1, H3 and H4 [21, 23]. All PAD isotypes require a high concentration of calcium to perform their function, typically above 100 µM. Therefore, in most physiological states, PADs remain inactive. Upon binding of Ca²⁺, PADs undergo a conformational change that moves the cysteine of the active site into a competent position for catalysis [21, 24]. As shown by Tarcsa et al., not all arginine residues within a polypeptide are amenable to citrullination by PADs. In the case of the two proteins: filaggrin and trichohyalin, the secondary structure is a determinant factor for arginine accessibility and potential conversion to citrulline [25]. Arginine residues in filaggrin, a protein rich in β-turn structures, were frequently citrullinated, as opposed to low
citrullination observed in trichohyalin, a protein in which single α-helix structures prevail [25]. Arginine residues located in disordered structures rapidly undergo the conversion to citrulline, with efficiency up to 95% [25, 26]. Furthermore, the reaction efficiency also depends on the amino acid sequence which contains the target arginine. Arginines located next to glutamic acid residues or flanked by prolines are reported to be less frequently citrullinated, in contrast to arginines proximal to aspartic acid residues, which are more likely to be a substrate for PADs [25, 27]. However, consensus sequences for arginine to citrulline conversion were reported only in filaggrin and trichohyalin, and no further studies involving other proteins have been published to date. Performing such studies on other targets is warranted as it would clarify whether these sequence-specific citrullination rules generally apply to known PAD targets.

As mentioned above, citrullination is crucial for several physiological processes, each being driven by one or more PAD isotypes. Processes reported to require PAD action include: skin differentiation (PAD1, PAD3), terminal differentiation of keratinocytes (PAD1, PAD3), brain and nervous system functioning (PAD2), immune cells differentiation (PAD2, PAD4), immune response—NET formation (PAD4) and proper functioning of the female reproductive system (PAD6). Table 1 summarises the most recent findings on the physiological roles of PAD isotypes and also presents the identified molecular targets/protein substrates.

## Expression of PADs in immune cells

Different PAD isoforms present tissue-specific expression patterns [45] (Table 1). Due to the key role of PADs in mediating inflammatory responses, the identification of the expression of specific PADs isoforms in immune cells is of particular importance, allowing their identification as potential therapeutic targets. PAD1 and PAD3 gene and protein expression is very low in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), but detected in specific leukocytes populations (Table 2). On the contrary, gene expression of PAD2 and PAD4 was observed in PBMCs, with detectable expression in B cells, T cells, NK cells and monocytes (CD14+, CD3-, CD19-, CD56-). During monocyte to macrophage differentiation, PAD4 gene expression is lost, but PAD4 protein expression persists, indicating its stability. In contrast, PAD2 mRNA levels remain unchanged during monocyte to macrophage differentiation, but PAD2 protein is only detected in macrophages, as PAD2 translation is initiated during macrophage differentiation [46]. Expression of PAD4 in monocytes and PAD2/PAD4 in resting macrophages is, however, not associated to constitutive citrullination. A raise in cytosolic calcium concentration, as occurring during NETs formation or apoptosis, leading to an activatory conformational

<table><caption>**Table 1** Physiological roles of PADs</caption><thead><tr><th>PAD isotype</th><th>Expression profile</th><th>Known substrates</th><th>Physiological roles</th><th>Refs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PAD1</td><td>Immune cells, keratinocytes, hair follicle, epidermis, uterus</td><td>Keratin, Filaggrin, S100A3, MEK1-ERK1/2-MMP2 signalling enzymes</td><td>Skin differentiation, terminal differentiation of keratinocytes, epithelial-mesenchymal transition</td><td>[5, 28–30]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD2</td><td>Immune cells, spleen, thymus, skeletal muscle, brain, glial cells, colon, kidney, pancreas, breast, epidermal, bone marrow, salivary gland, secretory gland, ear, eye</td><td>MPB, CXCL10, CXCL11, Vimentin, Actin, GFAP, S100A3, Histone H3, Histone H4</td><td>Oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination, brain plasticity, female reproduction, transcription regulation</td><td>[5, 29, 31–33]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD3</td><td>Immune cells, keratinocytes, hair follicles, nerves</td><td>Filaggrin, Vimentin, Trichohyalin, S100A3</td><td>Skin differentiation, hair follicle formation, terminal differentiation of keratinocytes</td><td>[5, 28, 29]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD4</td><td>Immune cells, brain, uterus, bone marrow, joints, cancerous tissues (e.g. breast carcinomas, lung carcinomas)</td><td>NFC1, NCF2, S100A3, Collagen Type I, HAT p300, NPM1, GSK3β, ING4, RPS2, FUS, EWS, O TAF15, ADAMTS13, Histone H1 (R54Cit), Histone H2A (R3Cit), Histone H3 (R17Cit, R26Cit, R2Cit, R8Cit), Histone H4 (R23Cit, R3Cit)</td><td>Immune cells differentiation, cellular differentiation, NET formation, gene expression regulation, tumorigenesis</td><td>[5, 13, 28, 29, 33–41]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD6</td><td>Ovary, early embryo, testicles, ovum, oocyte, thymus</td><td>α-tubulin</td><td>Cytoskeletal reorganization in the egg and early embryo, preimplantation cleavage, early embryonic development, oocyte cytoskeletal sheet formation and female fertility</td><td>[42–44]</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 2** Estimated protein expression levels based on HIPED (the Human Integrated Protein Expression Database), a unified database of protein abundance in human tissues, residing within GeneCards</caption><thead><tr><th>Leukocytes/PAD isotype</th><th>PAD1</th><th>PAD2</th><th>PAD3</th><th>PAD4</th><th>PAD6</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Agranulocytes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Monocytes</td><td>++</td><td>+++</td><td>-</td><td>++</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>B lymphocytes</td><td>+++</td><td>+</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>T lymphocytes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD4</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>CD8</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>++</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Nk-cells</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>-</td><td>+</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Granulocytes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Neutrophils</td><td>-</td><td>++</td><td>+</td><td>+++</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Eosinophils</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td><td>+</td><td>nd</td></tr><tr><td>Basophils</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td><td>nd</td></tr></tbody></table>

nd no data; - no expression; +low/+ +moderate/+ +high estimated protein expression level

change by the binding of Ca²⁺ to the Ca²⁺ binding sites of PADs is necessary to induce their activation [29].

## PAD inhibitors

The link between PAD activity and inflammatory conditions is strong, with citrullination being causal for the formation of NETs. Therefore, recent years have witnessed an ever growing interest in the development of PAD inhibitors (PADis).

Several reversible wide-spectrum PAD inhibitors have been identified, including streptomycin, minocycline, taxol, chlorotetracycline, ruthenium red and sanguinarine [47–50]. Even more attention has been devoted to the finding of specific PAD4 inhibitors, as PAD4 appears to be the main driver of most citrullination dependent diseases. Initially, GSK121 was identified as a lead compound in a screen for PAD4 inhibitors, and was the basis for lead optimization to produce the more potent and specific PAD4 inhibitors GSK484 and GSK199 [50]. These specific PAD4 inhibitors showed significant inhibition of protein citrullination and NET formation in human and mouse neutrophils [51]. In a recent study, Aliko et al. tested six compounds proposed as novel PAD4 inhibitors, one of which (compound 4—SC97362) showed significant inhibitory potential [52].

Reversible PADis are relatively weak inhibitors, most likely due to the small active site cavity which requires calcium binding to the enzyme to accommodate the side chain of peptidyl-arginine substrate [53]. Therefore, the most potent PADis described to date are compounds that covalently modify the active site cysteine, in an irreversible way [50]. An activity-based protein profiling high-throughput

screening platform identified NSC95397 and streptonigrin as irreversible PADis [50]. It was also shown that 2-chloroacetamide covalently binds to and inhibits PAD4 [54–56]. In 2006, Luo et al. described two compounds Cl-amidine and F-amidine which act as pan-PAD inhibitors through covalent modification of the active site cysteine in a time and concentration dependent manner [56, 57]. Both inhibitors have shown promising results for potential use as therapeutics. Cl-amidine reduced ex vivo NET formation by preventing histone H3 citrullination [58] and reduced the severity of arthritis by reducing the production of autoantibodies against citrullinated epitopes in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis [59]. F-amidine was shown to inhibit the citrullination of p300 by PAD4 [57]. Incorporation of a carboxylate moiety at the *ortho* position of Cl-amidine and F-amidine produced the second generation of PADis, namely *o*-Cl-amidine and *o*-F-amidine [50, 53]. These modified inhibitors show significant improvement of potency and selectivity, and are more potent in inhibiting histone H3 citrullination in HL-60 cells (> 100-fold) [50, 60]. Two more modifications of Cl-amidine and F-amidine were synthesized by introducing an N-terminal biphenyl group and a C-terminal benzimidazole group, namely BB-Cl-amidine and BB-F-amidine. The introduced groups increase the hydrophobicity, bioavailability and stability of the compounds [50]. Although these PADis show similar potency to Cl-amidine and F-amidine, BB-Cl-amidine has a longer half-life in vivo than Cl-amidine, and is also more cytotoxic to U2OS cells (~ 20 fold) [50, 61]. BB-Cl-amidine was shown to inhibit NET formation and to downregulate the expression of type I interferon genes in MRL/lpr mice [61]. Another derivative of Cl-amidine—PAD2-IN-1—is a potent and highly selective PAD2 inhibitor (over 95-fold and 79-fold more potent over PAD4 and PAD3, respectively) [62]. Interestingly, two peptidic PADis with C-terminal chloroacetamidine- or fluoro-conjugated orthenine were identified in a small library: TDFA (Thr-Asp-F-amidine) and TDCA (Thr-Asp-Cl-amidine). These two compounds show high selectivity to specific PAD isoforms: TDFA towards PAD4 and TDCA towards PAD1 and PAD4 [50, 53]. Although numerous PADis have been reported in the literature, as presented in Table 3, Cl-amidine and BB-Cl-amidine remain the most investigated.

## Protein citrullination as a hallmark of immune disorders

Findings of the recent years have permitted to establish that citrullination is a process strongly linked to inflammation [79]. Multiple studies show that most immune disorders are characterized by an excess of citrullinated proteins [19]. The human immune system in normal conditions is not self-reacting to citrullinated proteins. However, as citrullination
<table><caption>**Table 3** An overview of PAD inhibitors</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Inhibitor</th><th>IUPAC name (from PubChem)</th><th>Inhibitory potential</th><th>Refs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Reversible inhibitors</td><td>Streptomycin</td><td>2-[(1R,2R,3S,4R,5R,6S)-3-(diaminomethylideneamino)-4-[(2R,3R,4R,5S)-3-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6S)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3-(methylamino)oxan-2-yl]oxy-4-formyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-oxolan-2-yl]oxy-2,5,6-trihydroxycyclohexyl] guanidine</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 1.8 mM</td><td>[50, 55, 63]</td></tr><tr><td>Minocycline</td><td>(4S,4aS,5aR,12aR)-4,7-bis(dimethylamino)-1,10,11,12a-tetrahydroxy-3,12-dioxo-4a,5,5a,6-tetrahydro-4H-tetracene-2-carboxamide</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 620 µM</td><td>[48, 50, 64]</td></tr><tr><td>Taxol</td><td>[4,12-diacetyloxy-15-(3-benzamido-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoyl)oxy-1,9-dihydroxy-10,14,17,19-tetramethyl-11-oxo-6-oxatetra-cyclo[11.3.1.03,10.04,7]heptadec-13-en-2-yl] benzoate</td><td>Pan-PAD inhibition at 12.5 mM</td><td>[49, 50, 65, 66]</td></tr><tr><td>Chlortetracycline</td><td>(4S,4aS,5aS,6S,12aR)-7-chloro-4-(dimethylamino)-1,6,10,11,12a-pentahydroxy-6-methyl-3,12-dioxo-4,4a,5,5a-tetrahydro-drotetracene-2-carboxamide</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 100 µM</td><td>[48, 50, 63, 67]</td></tr><tr><td>Ruthenium red</td><td>Azane; ruthenium(2+); hexachloride; dihydrate</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 30 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2: 17 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3: 25 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4: 10 µM</td><td>[50]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Sanguinarine</td><td>24-methyl-5,7,18,20-tetraoxa-24-azoniahexacyclo[11.11.0.02,10.04,8.014,22.017,21]tetracosa-1(24),2,4(8),9,11,13,15,17(21),22- nonaene</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 2000 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 100 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 60 µM<br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 80 µM</td><td>[50, 68]</td></tr><tr><td>GSK121</td><td>(3-aminopiperidin-1-yl)(1-methyl-2-(1-methyl-1H-indol-2-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5-yl) methanone 2,2,2-trifluoroacetate</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 3.2 µM</td><td>[50, 51]</td></tr><tr><td>GSK484</td><td>(3-amino-4-hydroxy-piperidin-1-yl)-(8-(7-(cyclopropyl-methyl)-7-aza-bicyclo[4.3.0]nona-1(6),2,4,8-tetraen-8-yl)-5-methoxy-7-methyl-7,9-diaza-bicyclo[4.3.0]nona-1,3,5,8-tetraen-3-yl)-methanone</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 50 nM</td><td>[50, 51, 69, 70]</td></tr><tr><td>GSK199</td><td>(R)-(3-Aminopiperidin-1-yl)(2-(1-ethyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-2-yl)-7-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-5-yl)methanone hydrochloride</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 200 nM</td><td>[28, 50, 51, 71]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Irreversible inhibitors</td><td>NSC95397</td><td>2,3-bis(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 175 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 1600 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 9150 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 4530 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 68, 72, 73]</td></tr><tr><td>Streptonigrin</td><td>5-amino-6-(7-amino-6-methoxy-5,8-dioxoquinolin-2-yl)-4-(2-hydroxy-3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-methylpyridine-2-carboxylic acid</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 3700 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 12,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 3500 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 440,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 74]</td></tr><tr><td>2-chloro-acetamide</td><td>2-chloroacetamide</td><td>–</td><td>[50, 54, 75, 76]</td></tr><tr><td>Cl-amidine</td><td>N-[(2S)-1-amino-5-[(1-amino-2-chloroethylidene)amino]-1-oxopentan-2-yl]benzamide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 37,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 1200 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 2000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 13,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[31, 51, 56, 58, 60, 61 64]</td></tr><tr><td>o-Cl-amidine</td><td>N-α-(2-carboxyl)benzoyl-N5-(2-Chloro-1-iminoethyl)-L-ornithine amide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 2800 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 380 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 170 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 3000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 54, 56, 62]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">o-F-amidine</td><td rowspan="3">N-α-(2-carboxyl)benzoyl-N5-(2-fluoro-1-iminoethyl)-L-ornithine amide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 100,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 40,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 8000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 50,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 60]</td></tr><tr><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 40,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 180,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 7000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 45,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 60]</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 3 (continued)**</caption><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Inhibitor</th><th>IUPAC name (from PubChem)</th><th>Inhibitory potential</th><th>Refs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td>BB-Cl-amidine</td><td>N-[(1S)-4-[(1-amino-2-chloroethylidene) amino]-1-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)butyl]- 4-phenylbenzamide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 16 100 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 4 100 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 6 800 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 13 300 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>EC<sub>50</sub> PAD4 = 8.8 µM</td><td>[50, 56, 61, 70]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>BB-F-amidine</td><td>N-[(1S)-4-[(1-amino-2-fluoroethylidene) amino]-1-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)butyl]- 4-phenylbenzamide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 900 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD2 = 1200 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD3 = 3400 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 3750 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>PAD2-IN-1</td><td>N-[(1S)-4-[(1-amino-2-fluoroethylidene) amino]-1-(4-ethoxy-1-methylbenzimidazol- 2-yl)butyl]-3-oxo-1,2-dihydroisoindole- 4-carboxamide</td><td>IC<sub>50</sub> PAD2 = 8.3 µM</td><td>[50, 62]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>TDFA</td><td>N-Acetyl-L-threonyl-L-α-aspartyl-N5-(2- fluoroethanimidoyl)-L-ornithinamide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 25,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 77, 78]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>TDCA</td><td>N-Acetyl-L-threonyl-L-α-aspartyl-N5-(2- chloroethanimidoyl)-L-ornithinamide</td><td>K<sub>i</sub> PAD1 = 20,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup><br>K<sub>i</sub> PAD4 = 24,000 M<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup></td><td>[50, 78]</td></tr></tbody></table>

substantially affects protein structure and folding, some epitopes may undergo changes or new epitopes may be formed upon protein citrullination, which in turn may trigger immune response against citrullinated host protein resulting in autoimmune reaction [80]. Moreover, in most patients with autoimmune-mediated conditions, PAD2 and PAD4 levels are elevated, further indicating a strong correlation between protein citrullination and these diseases [4]. In line with these observations, high levels of citrullinated proteins are often found in patients prior to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis [81].

Abnormal PAD activity is now firmly associated with a number of immune disorders, such as: rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, periodontitis, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (Table 4) [15, 82]. In the following sections the latest findings on PAD's involvement in immune system disorders, including COVID-19, recently affecting the world globally, are discussed.

## PAD4-mediated NETs: the double edged sword of the immune system

Neutrophils, a subclass of blood granulocytes, constitute the vanguard of the human innate immune response to invading pathogens: bacteria, fungi and viruses [86, 87]. Their modes of action include: phagocytosis—consisting of the direct engulfing of pathogens, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and release of cytokines and chemokines, which recruit other immune cells and enhance the host immune response [88, 89]. In 2004, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was identified as a new mechanism of neutrophil action against invading pathogens [90]. NETs are composed of a decondensed chromatin scaffold decorated with factors possessing

high bactericidal properties such as: citrullinated histones, cathepsin G, lactoferrin, proteinase 3, neutrophil elastase (NE), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and peptidoglycan-binding proteins [91]. NETs have been also reported to be highly effective in fighting viral infections by blocking viral replication through PKC (Protein Kinase C) pathway inhibition [89, 92]. As shown by numerous studies, NET formation is also a citrullination dependent process, mainly driven by PAD4-mediated citrullination of histone H3 [93]. Neutrophils show a high expression level for PAD4, further indicating an important function for this enzyme in cell specific immunoreactivity [94]. The classic NET activation pathway via the induction of the formation of terminal complement complexes (C5b-9) is described in detail in other reviews [95]. Briefly, during NET formation, PAD4 citrullinates histones in neutrophils, resulting in chromatin decondensation due to the loss of histone positive charges [29, 96]. Part of the citrullinated histones may be excised from the chromatic template and subsequently released in the extracellular space where anti-pathogen effects takes place [97]. The mechanism is schematically presented on Fig. 3. The importance of PAD4 action for NETs was initially shown in studies utilizing pan-PAD inhibitors, such as Cl-amidine, that significantly reduces NET formation [29]. Subsequently, novel reversible PAD4-specific inhibitors, belonging to the GSK family (GSK121, GSK199 and GSK484) were shown to be sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation [51]. Several studies suggest also a role for PAD2 in NET action, however, in contrast to PAD4, PAD2 is currently not viewed as a factor required for NET formation, but rather as an intrinsic component of mature NETs [98–100]. Although beneficial during pathogen invasion, citrullination driven NET formation can also have detrimental effects on the host, thus it may
<table><caption>**Table 4** Reported involvement of PADs in immune disorders</caption><thead><tr><td>PAD isotype</td><td>Disease</td><td>Role in disease/molecular target (if applicable)</td><td>Refs</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PAD1</td><td>Psoriasis</td><td>Changes in skin differentiation pathways/keratin</td><td>[13, 83]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD2</td><td>Multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, COVID-19</td><td>Hypercitrullination of MBP resulting in myelin sheet disruption/MBP</td><td>[84, 85]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD4</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, cancer, COVID-19</td><td>Hypercitrullination of many proteins e.g. vimentin, filaggrin, MP resulting in production of ACPAs and acute autoinflammatory reactions, excessive NET formation, gene expression regulation via histone citrullination</td><td>[5, 13, 31, 86]</td></tr><tr><td>PAD6</td><td>Infertility</td><td>Early embryonic arrest/unknown</td><td>[42, 43]</td></tr></tbody></table>

be perceived as a double edged sword. Increased action of PAD enzymes in NETs may result in loss of immune tolerance to citrullinated proteins, and recently multiple studies have shown that excessive NETs build up may contribute to the development of several autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases [91].

## Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune disorder in which protein citrullination plays a prominent role. RA is a chronic and progressive disease, characterized by a symmetric deformity of joints, which may result in structural damage to the joint and systemic inflammation [101]. A specific characteristic of the disease is the presence of high quantities of autoantibodies directed against post-translationally modified proteins in synovial tissue fluids [19]. Pathogenesis of RA can progress for decades, with initial years of asymptomatic autoimmunity, until symptoms, including tissues erosion and joint inflammation become apparent [102]. RA can cause disability as chronic synovial inflammation, as well as hyperplasia, drive joint damaging and bone thinning [103]. As shown by numerous reports, protein

citrullination, and thus PAD activity, is one of the main players in RA pathogenesis. In RA patients the expression, activity as well as activation of PAD2 and PAD4 are increased [104]. A model for increased PAD activity in inflamed joints proposed that PAD enzymes originate from monocytes and macrophages recruited to the joints [13, 46]. In this model, macrophages and monocytes rich in PADs are eventually degraded and undergo apoptosis, which causes PAD activation due to rising levels of calcium [46]. These activated PADs are then free to citrullinate both cellular and extracellular proteins, building an excessive pool of citrullinated proteins in the joints that eventually cause the loss of immune tolerance [19]. Some of the best known PAD2 and PAD4 targets in RA are: vimentin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, anti-thrombin and α-enolase [19]. When immune tolerance to citrullinated proteins is lost, anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPAs) are produced that recognize the newly formed epitopes [105]. ACPAs are detected in 75% of RA patients, and, therefore, their detection is used as a predictive method before disease onset as they are present in the serum of patients even 5 years prior to the symptomatic phase of the disease [3]. Although a large number of proteins are targeted by PADs in RA, only a few were identified as targets for ACPAs namely: vimentin, α-enolase and fibrinogen. These ACPAs demonstrate arthritogenic potential

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Schematic presentation of the classical concept for PAD 4-mediated NET formation. (1) Neutrophils stimulated by a range of proinflammatory stimuli, including microbial agents, trigger a cascade of reactions that ultimately entrap and kill pathogens. (2) PAD4-</figcaption></figure>

driven hypercitrullination of proteins, including histones, causes changes in the chromatin architecture and relaxation of its structure. (3) This allows neutrophils to release chromatin fibres that are able to bind and kill bacteria as well as degrade virulence factors
and greatly stimulate the progression of the autoimmune response, suggesting their direct involvement in the pathogenesis of RA. The biological actions of ACPAs include: stimulation/promotion of proinflammatory cytokine production, induction of osteoclastogenesis and stimulation of NET formation [105]. In vitro studies demonstrated that ACPAs from RA patients activate the complement via the classical and alternative pathway, which further exacerbate the autoimmune response in the joints [106]. It was also reported that ACPAs may stimulate macrophages to produce and release inflammatory mediators (e.g. TNF-α) in the joints [107, 108]. NETs are reported to be highly dysfunctional in RA, and serve as a driving force for increasing ACPAs [6]. PAD4-mediated NET formation leads to citrullination of histones H2A, H2B and H4 serving as antigens and, in addition, generation of citrullinated vimentin which stimulates the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [109, 110]. Increased NET formation may be induced by inflammatory mediators such as: TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-17. These mediators are released by immune cells in large quantities in response to ACPAs and NETs, and amplify the occurrence of ACPAs antigens. Therefore, a cycle of NET formation and ACPAs accumulation can be hypothesized: the initial ACPAs induce inflammatory mediators which in turn activate NET formation and the production of even more ACPAs (Fig. 4) [111]. The vicious circle of reciprocal reinforcement of ACPAs and NETs does not apply, however, to all reported ACPAs. The use of monoclonal therapeutic antibodies designed to target citrullinated N-termini of histones 2A and 4 demonstrated that citrullinated histones are specific targets for therapeutic intervention with anti CitH2/H4 therapeutic antibodies, leading to a decrease in NET formation [111]. The development of therapeutic anti-citrullinated antibodies will be discussed more in detail in the paragraph "Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of citrullination". It was also recently reported that NETs can directly injure cartilage in RA, with PAD2 action directly contributing to this process [112]. To summarize, PAD catalytic activity and protein citrullination have been linked to the pathogenesis of RA for over 20 years, however, the role for NETs in RA etiology and the comprehension of the mechanisms leading to the development of strong autoimmune responses to citrullinated proteins still require further elucidation.

## N-glycosylation determines the pathogenicity of ACPAs

N-linked glycans play an important role in immunity and, in autoimmune disease, the severity of the response to autoantibodies can be modulated by the degree of glycosylation on the Fc or variable domain (Fab) of immunoglobulins [113]. Several studies demonstrated that glycosylation patterns of ACPAs modulate their pathogenicity and change during autoimmune disease progression. To evaluate the

establishment of Fc glycosylation patterns on ACPAs before onset of rheumatoid arthritis and during the development of the disease, serum was collected at baseline from patients with ACPA-positive arthralgia—a joint pain condition predisposing to RA—and at a various follow-up time points. Within this cohort, the 57% of the participants who developed arthritis displayed a higher degree of ACPA-IgG1 Fc fucosylation at baseline and prior to diagnosis as compared to the fucosylation levels observed in total IgG1 [114]. Similarly, a strong enrichment of N-linked glycans on the Fab-domain of ACPAs IgG, leading to a 10–20 kDa higher molecular weight compared to non-autoreactive IgG, was identified in RA patients [115]. Structural analysis indicated that > 90% of ACPA-IgG Fab-domain contains highly sialylated glycans, representing a five-fold enrichment in sialylation as compared to control IgGs from the same donor [116]. High sialylation was more notable in ACPAs from synovial fluids than serum ACPAs from the same patient [116]. These data indicate that ACPAs glycosylation contribute to their arthritogenic potential and increased glycosylation stimulates the progression to RA. The measure of ACPAs glycosylation levels may potentially be used as a biomarker to monitor disease progression and ACPAs IgG glycosylation may be a target for disease treatment.

## Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS) [117]. Demyelination leads to loss of nerve signal transduction, causing severe adverse neurological effects that are clinically manifested as ataxia, weakness, visual loss, movement disorders, bladder dysfunction and even complete disability [118, 119]. The etiology and pathogenesis of MS still remains unclear. It is believed that genetic factors combined with environmental factors and vitamin D deficiency contribute towards a higher risk of MS development [120]. Another theory indicates that epigenetic changes, highly susceptible to environmental factors, passed from parents to progeny may also contribute to MS onset [121]. One of the proposed mechanisms for the occurrence of demyelination and MS development is the failure to maintain the myelin sheet structure due to excessive myelin basic protein (MBP) citrullination. MPB citrullination was shown to be carried out by PAD2, and increased expression of this isotype is reported in the white matter and peripheral blood of MS patients [84, 85]. Overexpression of PAD2 and the associated enhancement of citrullination of MPB in MS patients is the result of hypomethylation of the PAD2 gene promoter [84]. The role of PAD2 in demyelination is also supported by a study in which PAD2 knock-out mice exhibit no CNS citrullination and demyelination [65]. In healthy individuals, 18% of MBP arginines are citrullinated whereas in MS
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** The proposed role of NETs and increasing ACPAs level in rheumatoid arthritis. (1) ACPAs induce the production and release of inflammatory mediators by macrophages. (2) Inflammatory mediators secreted from macrophages induce NET formation. (3) Citrullinated</figcaption></figure>

proteins released during NETosis are recognised by lymphocytes T. (4) Antigen presentation and induction of ACPA production resulting in a vicious inflammatory circle with an excessive immune response

patients the citrullinated arginine to total arginine ratio increases to approximately 45% [4]. The enhanced citrullination profile of MBP causes extensive loss of net positive charges and partial unfolding of MBP molecules. MBP hypercitrullination prevents the transition of lipid bilayers into compact multilayers, resulting in highly unstable myelin sheets and loss of proper nerve signal transduction [65]. To summarise, current evidence indicates that excessive protein citrullination, mediated by PAD2 overexpression, may be an etiologic factor in MS onset.

## Systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that can manifest itself in any part of the body. Due to its heterogeneity in clinical manifestation, SLE diagnosis and treatment can be challenging [122]. SLE is characterized by loss of immune tolerance and abnormal B- and T-cell function, eventually leading to significant morbidity and mortality [122]. A hallmark of SLE is the release of a plethora of autoantibodies, including ACPAs [123]. Tissues of patients affected by SLE exhibit increased levels of citrullinated proteins. PAD4 is directly involved in SLE

through its role in NET formation and histone citrullination [124] while the role for PAD2 and other PAD isotypes in SLE has not yet been investigated. The observed high levels of citrullinated proteins contribute to the loss of immune tolerance and high production of ACPAs, which subsequently cause the detrimental autoimmune response in SLE [125].

## Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a relatively common chronic immune-mediated skin disorder, displaying clinical manifestations of well-demarcated red scaly lesions on the skin [125]. Psoriasis lesions are typically found on the scalp, elbow and knees, and the disease may also be accompanied by arthritis as comorbidity [126]. The cause of psoriasis remains to be elucidated. Clinically, psoriasis results from rapid proliferation of keratinocytes in the epidermis' basal layer and high migration of excess keratinocytes to the skin's surface. Due to such rapid maturation, keratinocytes accumulate on the skin surface forming thick dry patches [127, 128]. The reason for the hyperproliferation of keratinocytes is unknown, however, the infiltration of immune cells in the skin may play a decisive role in lesion formation [126]. Recently,
Benhadou et al. showed that the contribution of immune cells, keratinocytes, endothelial cells and several other skin-resident cells is required for the maintenance and progression of psoriatic alterations [129]. There is also evidence supporting a driving role of citrullination in psoriasis. PAD1 is expressed at high level in keratinocytes, where it citrullinates keratin K1 during terminal differentiation [83]. De minimization of arginines in keratin K1 facilitates the compaction of keratin filaments, a phenomenon required for normal epidermis cornification [4]. Several groups reported that in skin samples from psoriasis patients there is loss of citrullinated keratin K1 [83, 126, 130]. Lack of citrullinated keratin K1 results in disturbed epidermis cornification, and may be a contributing factor to psoriasis. It was reported that, besides lowered citrullinated keratin K1 levels in psoriasis patients, psoriatic cornified cell layers displayed lowered levels of global protein citrullination [83]. As expression levels of PAD5 in psoriatic lesions are not altered, the PAD5 catalytic activity is enhanced in the course of the disease [130]. Lately, a role for NETs was proposed in psoriasis, but their role is not defined. In psoriatic patients, the amount of NETs formed was increased and correlated with disease severity [125]. The administration of a PAD4 inhibitor Cl-amidine alleviated the gravity of psoriatic lesions in a mouse model and decreased NETs formation, suggesting a role for both NETs and PAD4 activity in this disorder [131].

## Periodontitis

Periodontitis (PD) is an inflammatory disease of the oral cavity affecting the tissues supporting teeth that, if left untreated, may result in teeth loss. PD is caused by the gram-negative anaerobic bacterium *Porphyromonas gingivalis* [4, 132]. The *P. gingivalis* peptidylarginine deiminase enzyme (PPAD) can rapidly citrullinate both bacterial and human host proteins such as fibrinogen and α-enolase [4]. PPAD released from *P. gingivalis* can spread into the host's connective tissue, where can modify/citrullinate epidermal growth factor (EGF), thus blocking its recognition by the epithelium. This mechanism delays the local healing process and breaks the local protective epithelial cell-periodontal tissue barrier [132]. PPAD also generates a pool of new potent antigenic epitopes that, when present in excess, break the tolerance barrier, which will result in generating ACPAs and may induce an acute autoimmune response [132, 133]. High levels of ACPAs are observed in patients with aggressive form of periodontitis [134]. Analysis of the possible link between PD and RA (as the autoimmune response induced by *P. gingivalis* is similar to that observed during RA) revealed that host and microbial PAD activities are highly elevated in RA and non-RA periodontitis patients. Moreover, the severity of periodontal conditions was increased in patients with RA comorbidity as compared to healthy

individuals [133, 135]. Although PD is not an autoimmune disease itself, it may induce a severe autoimmune response of the host, were citrullinated proteins are an important factor for disease development.

## Inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic inflammatory conditions characterized by inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. The two main subtypes of IBD include ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) [136]. In UC patients, chronic inflammation is limited to the intestinal mucosae and in CD patients the inflammation can be transmural in the whole gastrointestinal tract [136], rendering CD more aggressive. In healthy human colon enzymatic PAD activity is negligible, suggesting that de minimization processes are not physiologically required in the intestine. In contrast, PAD5 and citrullinated protein levels are increased in human UC [79]. As in the case of RA, elevated levels of citrullinated proteins may trigger an atypical immune response to the newly formed epitopes and high levels of ACPAs induce inflammation of the UC [136, 137]. Moreover, immunohistochemical staining of human UC samples demonstrated strong expression of both PAD2 and PAD4, and treatment of UC mice with Cl-amidine reduced inflammation [137]. A cohort study of 114 Japanese patients with UC suggested that specific PAD4 haplotypes previously known to be associated with RA are also found in UC [138]. Recent studies suggest an even more prominent role for PAD4 in IBD, as it was found that IBD occurrence was positively correlated with PAD4 and negatively correlated with PAD2 [82, 139]. Also, some researchers have tried to link IBD to NETs formation. Given the key role of citrullination in this process, higher correlation of increased PAD4 expression with IBD incidence may be explained. Inflamed colon of UC patients displayed increased NET formation and overexpression of NET-associated proteins, including citrullinated histones and PAD4, with both responses being diminished in subjects receiving streptonigrin, a selective PAD4 inhibitor [140, 141]. Similar results were recently reported by Li et al., in which NETs formation increased tissue damage and thrombotic tendency in IBD [142]. In conclusion, targeting NETs in IBD may provide an effective therapeutic approach to alleviate the disease [143].

## COVID-19 and pulmonary diseases

COVID-19 is a novel disease caused by infection with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [144]. The disease spread across the world from late 2019 causing a global pandemic and a plethora of global health, sociological and economical adverse effects [145, 146]. The disease can manifest itself with multiple
symptoms, making it hard to properly diagnose patients in the absence of a molecular test detecting the viral genome [147, 148]. The most common COVID-19 symptoms include: influenza-like symptoms, diarrhoea, anosmia, osteoarticular disorders and a cytokine storm which affects the functioning of the immune system [149]. The severity of the symptoms varies between patients, ranging from asymptomatic cases, to mild consequences, to lethal respiratory failure [150]. As scientists around the world race to find effective treatments to COVID-19, in addition to currently available preventive vaccination approaches, a link between the disease and protein citrullination starts to emerge. Sera from COVID-19 patients have elevated levels of citrullinated histone 3 as well as myeloperoxidase-DNA complexes, two specific markers of NETs [8]. Increased level of histone H3 citrullination in COVID-positive patients was found to be correlated with increased leukocyte, granulocytes and cytokine IL-8 levels, indicating the occurrence of an acute inflammatory response [9]. What is even more interesting, in the context of arginine deimination's role in determining the severity of COVID-19, is that SARS-CoV-2 positive patients show increased levels of NET formation, and sera from those patients cause NET formation when added to control neutrophils [10, 151]. The lungs are the most devas-tated organ by COVID-19, and elevated NETs formation was reported in lung epithelial tissue and tracheal aspirate, indi-cating that NETs may be an important factor to the severity of the disease [151–153]. As PAD4 activity is essential for NET formation, and elevated levels of citrullinated H3 are detected in COVID-19, it may be possible that the virus alters PAD4 activity. A recent study by Arisan et al. based on transcriptomic data from patients’ biopsies and in vitro experiments linked PADs activity to SARS-CoV-2 infection [154]. However, more studies on this subject must be per-formed to unravel the complete picture of PAD involvement, and NET formation, in COVID-19 [154]. Zuo et al. propose that the positive correlation between platelet count and cit-rullinated H3 levels, and thus the abnormal increased plate-let count, is one of the possible explanations for the vascular clinical manifestations of COVID-19 [8, 151]. Interestingly, elevated levels of citrullinated circulating nucleosomes were reported in COVID-19 patients [150]. Cavalier et al. propose to use circulating citrullinated nucleosomes as biomarkers for COVID-19, as citrullination levels are positively cor-related to disease severity [150]. SARS-CoV-2 is known to cause, in a percentage of patients, a post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, termed long-COVID, characterized by persistent symptoms and delayed long-term complications [155]. Such prolonged effects may result in even more excessive accumulation of citrullinated proteins, and, therefore, lead to loss of immune tolerance. A first case of increased levels of ACPA in a post-COVID-19 patient showing initial symptoms of RA was recently reported [156]. This may be the

first of many reported post-COVID-19 symptoms related to citrullination. These recent data linking citrullination and NETs to COVID-19 indicate that citrullination events may be highly relevant to the physiopathology of COVID-19 and more generally in pulmonary diseases associated with lung inflammation.

One of the COVID-associated pulmonary complications that develops even 6–8 weeks after initial infection with SARS-CoV-2, particularly in critically ill patients treated in intensive care units, is lung fibrosis, a condition that may also result from other causes such as cigarette smoking or long-term exposure to cigarette smoke. Although there is no data so far about protein citrullination level in COVID patients suffering from lung fibrosis, it was found that in a model of lung fibrosis induced by cadmium and carbon black (Cd/CB), two cigarette components providing a model for cigarette smoke, the level of citrullinated vimentin (Cit-vim) was significantly increased and was related with a TLR4-dependent activation of NF-κB and the production of active TGF-β1, CTGF (Connective Tissue Growth Factor) and IL-8 [157]. These ex vivo studies were confirmed in a mouse model in which control animals treated with Cit-vim developed TLR4-dependent lung tissue fibrosis, whereas PAD2<sup>-/-</sup> mice, exposed to cadmium/carbon black did not generate high amounts of Cit-vim. This observation points at PAD2 as a promising potential factor in fibrosis treatment.

## Cancer

Studies in cancer cell lines demonstrated that the occur-rence of histone citrullination, mediated by PAD4, on p53-regulated genes, including p21, CIP1, WAF1 and OKL38 repressed their transcriptional activation, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [158, 159]. These find-ings are in support of the notion that targeting PAD4 and other PAD enzymes may provide a novel strategy to inhibit tumor growth [160]. Immunohistochemistry and western blot detection demonstrated PAD4 overexpression in vari-ous tumor types, especially adenocarcinoma. In these sam-ples, PAD4 overexpression was found to be associated with cytokeratin, a widespread tumor marker, in a citrullinated form that rendered it resistant to the digestion by caspases [161]. Elevated PAD4 levels were also observed by ELISA in the blood of patients with malignant tumors, but not in blood of patients with benign tumors [162]. Similarly, over-expression of PAD2 was observed in prostate cancer and correlated to histone H3 citrullination [163]. Administra-tion of the pan-PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine synergized with the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide to decrease prostate cancer cells proliferation in vitro and in xenografts [163].

Besides the direct promoting effect of histone/protein citrullination on cancer growth, a recent study on a cohort
of 975 patients with cancer demonstrated that citrullinated histone H3, a marker of NETs and arterial thromboembolism, predicts the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with cancer [164].

## Thrombosis

A study by Fuchs et al. proved for the first time that NETs perfused with blood caused platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation demonstrating that NETs provide a structural platform and biological stimulus for thrombus formation [165]. PAD4, by promoting histone citrullination and chromatin decondensation, was identified to regulate both NETs formation and promote pathological thrombosis [166]. The overexpression of PAD4 was shown to promote, in an in vitro system, chromatin decondensation and formation of NET-like structures in cell types that do not undergo this form of cell death [167]. That PAD4 is necessary to mediate NETs formation was demonstrated by gene targeting of PAD4. Neutrophils derived from PAD4 knock-out mice were unable to generate NETs upon exposure to bacteria or stimulation with chemokines [168], and PAD4 knock-out animals were more susceptible to bacterial infection [168]. The link between PAD4 activity, NETs formation and induction of thromboembolism has been demonstrated in PAD4 knock-out mice subjected to a stenosis model to promote deep vein thrombosis: upon intervention, < 10% of PAD4 knock-out animals produced a thrombus, as compared to 90% of the control wild type animals [169].

## Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of citrullination

Recent years brought significant progress into the understanding of the role of the citrullination process in immune disorders. The growing body of evidence highlighting the importance of citrullination, and the identification of autoantibodies directed to the citrullinated peptides or proteins (ACPAs) has significantly broadened our understanding, and clinical characterization, of many immune disorders. The number of the ongoing clinical studies targeting PADs and the citrullination process is, however, currently limited to a few. The most advanced studies concern rheumatoid arthritis, and include diagnostic tests (Table 5) as well as interventional trials (Table 6).

The non-interventional studies aim at the identification and quantification of the prevalence of anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies directed against different citrullinated antigens, including collagen, fibrinogen, filaggrin or vitronitin, to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic value in rheumatoid arthritis progression (Table 5, NCT01078597, NCT03265236, NCT03224377). Monitoring of anti-cyclic

citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) antibodies titers in RA, brought the conclusion that anti-CCP antibodies have a better diagnostic power than anti-MCV antibodies. However, anti-MCV antibodies have a higher sensitivity as compared to anti-CCP antibodies. A significant correlation has been found between anti-MCV antibodies titers and both the severity of RA and the disease-activity score (DAS28). Anti-MCV-positive patients presented lower reduction in disease activity and an increased number of swollen joints. This finding allowed concluding that anti-MCV antibodies titers may work as an indicator correlating the disease activity and patient outcome [170]. Also, an attempt was made to characterize the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis from lung level (NCT03832374), as it was found that diffuse interstitial pneumopathy and bronchial dysfunctions occur in one-third of RA patients, and that some subtypes of ACPAs are preferentially present in the lungs [171]. This study (NCT03832374), still ongoing, addresses a very important question regarding the subtype(s) of ACPAs with a preferential tropism for the lung, that might be responsible for the infection within parenchyma and pulmonary airways, and the overall increased morbidity and mortality among RA patients with lung co-morbidities.

Likewise, an observational study was performed to assess the impact of ACPA in RA participants who were treated with the immunosuppressive drug Abatacept or the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis): adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept or golimumab (NCT03663829). A total of 2052 patients were included of which 1415 were in the TNFis cohort (n = 1053 ACPA positive) and 637 in the Abatacept cohort (n = 445 ACPA positive). The baseline ACPA score was associated with an improvement in clinical response using a measure of clinical disease-activity index at 12 months for Abatacept therapy, but not for TNFis therapy [172].

As of today, most of the interventional trials are at an early clinical testing phase (Table 6). The most advanced clinical studies concern investigation of the effect of combination therapy of Abatacept and methotrexate on rheumatoid arthritis (NCT03492658). Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) is a fusion protein, combining cytotoxic T cell antigen 4 (CTLA4) and IgG₁Fc₁, dedicated to modulate the T cell co-stimulatory signal. Abatacept works as an immune checkpoint and downregulates immune responses mediated through the CD28–CD80/86 pathway. The dose ranging pilot study of patients with active RA, treated with both Abatacept and LEA29Y (Belatacept, a CTLA4-Ig variant), showed dose dependent reductions in the clinical manifestations of disease [173]. Following the pilot studies, an investigation of combined therapy with Abatacept and methotrexate, an immune system suppressant, is now ongoing for the determination of its effectiveness on RA phenotype, transcriptional
<table><caption>**Table 5** Diagnostic studies based on citrullination in the immune disorders</caption><thead><tr><th>Analyzed parameter</th><th>Disease</th><th>Clinical trial registration number</th><th>Phase of the study</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Subtypes of ACPA</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis</td><td>NCT03832374</td><td>Descriptive study</td></tr><tr><td>ACPA antibody</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis</td><td>NCT03663829</td><td>Non-interventional study</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-MCV Ab and anti-CCP Ab</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis</td><td>NCT01078597<br>NCT03265236<br>NCT03224377</td><td>Diagnostic test</td></tr></tbody></table>

The clinical trial registration number from www.clinicaltrials.gov is provided. Anti-CCP Ab anti-cyclic-citrullinated peptide antibody; Anti-MCV Ab anti-mutated-citrullinated vimentin antibody

<table><caption>**Table 6** Targeting autoimmune diseases using ACPAs</caption><thead><tr><th>Drug</th><th>Disease</th><th>Clinical trial registration number</th><th>Phase of the study</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Abatacept, Methotrexate</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic diseases</td><td>NCT03492658</td><td>Interventional trial, Phase 4</td></tr><tr><td>Enbrel</td><td>Psoriatic arthritis</td><td>NCT04428502</td><td>Observational trial</td></tr><tr><td>Enbrel</td><td>Rheumatoid arthritis</td><td>NCT04428424</td><td>Observational trial</td></tr></tbody></table>

The clinical trial registration number from www.clinicaltrials.gov is provided

profile of the disease, B cell receptor usage and functional parameters of circulating B cells expressing ACPA (NCT03492658). Patients will be randomized to treatment with (i) methotrexate monotherapy (10–25 mg once weekly) reference group or a (ii) combination therapy of methotrexate (10–25 mg once weekly) and Abatacept (125 mg subcutaneously once weekly) for 6 months, followed by methotrexate monotherapy (10–25 mg once weekly) in both groups for another 6 months. Phase II (NCT00254293) [174] and III (NCT00048568) of the trial gave promising results and showed that long-term treatment with Abatacept provided sustained efficacy with high RA patient retention [175].

Other ongoing clinical trials addressing the study of citrullination process are aiming to evaluate the effect of Enbrel treatment with regards to anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide in psoriatic arthritis activity (NCT04428502) and the impact of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide in rheumatoid arthritis (NCT04428424). Enbrel, also known as Etanercept, is a TNF-α inhibitor used to treat autoimmune diseases. In previous studies Enbrel efficacy was compared with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) commonly used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It was found that Enbrel leads to a much greater decrease of the serum levels of anti-CCP and RF in rheumatoid arthritis than DMARDs alone. This finding was compatible with a reduction in clinical disease activity [176], Ann Rheum Dis 2006 Jan;65(1):35–9). Moreover, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Etanercept, the drug was given over a 2-years

period (25 mg twice per week) to patients suffering from different autoimmune disorders, including: ankylosing spondylitis (9 patients), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (4 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (57 patients) and psoriatic arthritis (6 patients). This study confirmed the safety of Etanercept administration up to two years. Also, declined levels anti-CCP antibody and rheumatoid factor observed in this study, lead to the conclusion that a significant clinical response in different subclasses of arthritis patients can be achieved by Etanercept [177]. Further clinical studies on Etanercept and Abatacept addressing their anti-inflammatory potential will be necessary allow a full validation of their clinical value and, in the affirmative, a progression towards their routine clinical use.

As outlined above, the clinical studies addressing citrullination are focused around citrullinated protein antibodies as a diagnostic element to assess disease progression. However, a recent preclinical report delivered by Chirivi and co-workers provides evidence that ACPAs can also potentially be used as therapeutics for neutrophil-mediated inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, pulmonary fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease and sepsis [111]. Using these therapeutic ACPAs (tACPAs), particularly against citrullinated histones H2A and H4, it was found that in mice suffering from chronic arthritis these antibodies suppressed NET release and possibly initiated NET uptake by macrophages, resulting in reduced tissue damage in the joints [111].

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>
Conclusions and future perspectives

Recent basic, preclinical and clinical research in the early
diagnosis of autoimmune disease, particularly arthritis, has
shown that conversion of selected arginine residues to citrul-
line and the immune response to citrullinated proteins are
key elements of recognition and better understanding the
etiology of these disorders. It was shown that ACPAs are
also directly involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune
disorders at several levels through (i) ligation to Fc recep-
tors [178], (ii) modification of the function of monocytes
[179], (iii) differentiation of osteoclasts [128] and (iv) for-
mation of extracellular DNA traps [6]. Recent research has
also shown that there is a potential link between the histone
specific ACPAs (directed to citH2A and citH4) and NETs
that deserves to be investigated and may lead to promising
new strategies in treatment of autoimmune diseases [180].

It is now becoming evident that further studies on the
effects of protein citrullination, biochemistry of citrulli-
nating enzymes and modification of cellular proteins, and
also on generation of ACPAs, will significantly help in
understanding the metabolic processes as well as patho-
physiology of multiple disorders, not only of immune/
autoimmune origin, but also metabolic disease and cancer.
A deeper look into the "citrullinome" and the cross-talk
between citrullination and other modified residues may
bring the development of novel drugs acting against dis-
orders associated with aberrant citrullination.

**Author contributions** All the authors participated in writing and pre-
paring the presented version of the manuscript. OC, MB and AB raised
the concept. OC, MB, BP, LP and AB conducted the literature review
and wrote the first draft. OC and MS drew the figures and tables. All
authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

**Funding** The presented review was supported the Polish Ministry of Higher Education under Diamond Grant (2019–2023): DI2018 018948.

**Availability of data and material** Not applicable.

Declarations

**Conflict of interest** The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

**Ethics approval** Not applicable.

**Consent to participate** Not applicable.

**Consent for publication** Not applicable.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri-
bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes

were made. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a
copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

References

1. Bowman GD, Poirier MG (2014) Post-translational modifications of histones that Influence nucleosome dynamics. Chem Rev 115:2274–2295. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500350x

2. Ramazi S, Zahiri J (2021) Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods. Database. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baab012

3. Tilvawala R, Nguyen SH, Maurais AJ et al (2018) The rheumatoid arthritis-associated citrullinome. Cell Chem Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.03.002

4. Chirivi RGS (2013) Citrullination: a target for disease intervention in multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory diseases? J Clin Cell Immunol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9899.1000146

5. Yuzhalin AE (2019) Citrullination in cancer. Can Res 79:1274–1284. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2797

6. Khandpur R, Carmona-Rivera C, Vivekanandan-Giri A et al (2013) NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3005580

7. van Venrooij WJ, Pruijn GJM (2014) How citrullination invaded rheumatoid arthritis research. Arthritis Res Ther 16:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4458

8. Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H et al (2020) Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insig ht.138999

9. Leppkes M, Knopf J, Naschberger E et al (2020) Vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps in covid-19. EBioMedicine 58:102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102925

10. Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Navaz S et al (2021) Autoantibodies stabilize neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.21254692

11. Rogers GE, Simmonds DH (1958) Content of citrulline and other amino-acids in a protein of hair follicles. Nature 182:186–187. https://doi.org/10.1038/182186a0

12. Kaore SN, Amane HS, Kaore NM (2012) Citrulline: pharmacological perspectives and its role as an emerging biomarker in future. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 27:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2012.01059.x

13. Witalison E, Thompson P, Hofseth L (2015) Protein arginine deiminases and associated citrullination: physiological functions and diseases associated with dysregulation. Curr Drug Targets 16:700–710. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450116666150202160954

14. Slade DJ, Subramanian V, Fuhrmann J, Thompson PR (2013) Chemical and biological methods to detect post-translational modifications of arginine. Biopolymers 101:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22256

15. Alghamdi M, Alasmari D, Assiri A et al (2019) An overview of the intrinsic role of citrullination in autoimmune disorders. J Immunol Res 2019:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7592851

16. Ordóñez A, Martínez-Martínez I, Corrales FJ et al (2009) Effect of citrullination on the function and conformation of
antithrombin. FEBS J 276:6763-6772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1742-4658.2009.07391.x

17. Orgován G, Noszál B (2011) The complete microspeciation of arginine and citrulline. J Pharm Biomed Anal 54:965-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.11.023

18. Lazarus RC, Buonora JE, Kamnaksh A et al (2017) Citrullination following traumatic brain injury: a mechanism for ongoing pathology through protein modification. Protein Deimination Hum Health Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58244-3_16

19. Darrah E, Andrade F (2018) Rheumatoid arthritis and citrullination. Curr Opin Rheumatol 30:72-78. https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000452

20. Slade DJ, Fang P, Dreyton CJ et al (2015) Protein arginine deiminase 2 binds calcium in an ordered fashion: Implications for inhibitor design. ACS Chem Biol 10:1043-1053. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb500933j

21. Arita K, Hashimoto H, Shimizu T et al (2004) Structural basis for Ca²⁺-induced activation of human PAD4. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11:777-783. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb799

22. Mondal S, Thompson PR (2021) Chemical biology of protein citrullination by the protein a arginine deiminases. Curr Opin Chem Biol 63:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.01.010

23. Deng Q, Pan B, Alam HB et al (2020) Citrullinated histone H3 as a therapeutic target for endotoxic shock in mice. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02957

24. Arita K, Shimizu T, Hashimoto H et al (2006) Structural basis for Histone N-terminal recognition by human peptidylarginine deiminase 4. PNAS 103:5291-5296. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509639103

25. Tarcsa E, Marekov LN, Mei G et al (1996) Protein unfolding by peptidylarginine deiminase. J Biol Chem 271:30709-30716. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.48.30709

26. Wood DD, Moscarello MA (1989) The isolation, characterization, and lipid-aggregating properties of a citrulline containing myelin basic protein. J Biol Chem 264:5121-5127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)83707-3

27. Nomura K (1992) Specificity and mode of action of the muscle-type protein-arginine deiminase. Arch Biochem Biophys 293:362-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(92)90407-n

28. Jones J, Causey C, Knuckley B, Slack-Noyes J, Thompson P (2009) Protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4): current understanding and future therapeutic potential. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 5:616-627

29. Wang S, Wang Y (2013) Peptidylarginine deiminases in citrullination, gene regulation, health and pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Gene Regul Mechanisms 1829:1126-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.07.003

30. Qin H, Liu X, Li F et al (2017) PAD1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer cells by regulating MEK1-ERK1/2-MMP2 signaling. Cancer Lett 409:30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.08.019

31. Falcão AM, Meijer M, Scaglione A et al (2019) PAD2-mediated citrullination contributes to efficient oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.108

32. Horibata S, Coonrod SA, Cherrington BD (2012) Role for peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes in disease and female reproduction. J Reprod Dev 58:274-282. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2011-040

33. Mohanan S, Cherrington BD, Horibata S et al (2012) Potential role of peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes and protein citrullination in cancer pathogenesis. Biochem Res Int 2012:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/895343

34. Zhai Q, Wang L, Zhao P, Li T (2017) Role of citrullination modification catalyzed by peptidylarginine deiminase 4 in gene

transcriptional regulation. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 49:567-572. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmx042

35. Sorvillo N, Mizurini DM, Coxon C et al (2019) Plasma peptidylarginine peptidylarginine deiminase IV promotes vWF-platelet string formation and accelerates thrombosis after vessel injury. Circ Res 125:507-519. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.118.314571

36. Lee Y-H, Coonrod SA, Kraus WL et al (2005) Regulation of coactivator complex assembly and function by protein arginine methylation and demethylimination. PNAS 102:3611-3616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407159102

37. Stadler SC, Vincent CT, Fedorov VD et al (2013) Dysregulation of PAD4-mediated citrullination of nuclear Gsk3 activates tgf-signaling and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. PNAS 110:11851-11856. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308362110

38. Guo Q, Fast W (2011) Citrullination of inhibitor of growth 4 (ING4) by peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) disrupts the interaction between ING4 and p53. J Biol Chem 286:17069-17078. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111.230961

39. Tanikawa C, Espinosa M, Suzuki A et al (2012) Regulation of histone modification and chromatin structure by the p53-padi4 pathway. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1676

40. Guo Q, Bedford MT, Fast W (2011) Discovery of peptidylarginine deiminase-4 substrates by protein array: antagonistic citrullination and methylation of human ribosomal protein s2. Mol BioSyst 7:2286. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1mb05089c

41. Tanikawa C, Ueda K, Suzuki A et al (2018) Citrullination of RGG motifs in fet proteins by Pad4 regulates protein aggregation and Als susceptibility. Cell Rep 22:1473-1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.031

42. Esposito G, Vitale AM, Leijten FPJ et al (2007) Peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) 6 is essential for oocyte cytoskeletal sheet formation and female fertility. Mol Cell Endocrinol 273:25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2007.05.005

43. Xu Y, Shi Y, Fu J et al (2016) Mutations in Padi6 cause female infertility characterized by early embryonic arrest. Am J Hum Genet 99:744-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.024

44. Choi M, Lee O-H, Jeon S et al (2010) The oocyte-specific transcription factor, Nobox, regulates the expression of PAD6, a peptidylarginine deiminase in the oocyte. FEBS Lett 584:3629-3634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.037

45. Vossenaar ER, Zendman AJW, van Venrooij WJ, Pruijn GJM (2003) Pad, a growing family of citrullinating enzymes: Genes, features and involvement in disease. BioEssays 25:1106-1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10357

46. Vossenaar ER (2004) Expression and activity of citrullinating peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes in monocytes and macrophages. Ann Rheum Dis 63:373-381. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.012211

47. Knuckley B, Causey CP, Pellechia PJ et al (2009) Haloacetamidine-based inactivators of protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4): evidence that general acid catalysis promotes efficient inactivation. ChemBioChem 11:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200900698

48. Knuckley B, Luo Y, Thompson PR (2008) Profiling protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4): a novel screen to identify PAD4 inhibitors. Bioorgan Med Chem 16:739-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2007.10.021

49. Pritzker LB, Moscarello MA (1998) A novel microtubule independent effect of paclitaxel: the inhibition of peptidylarginine deiminase from bovine brain. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 1388:154-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4838(98)00175-7

50. Mondal S, Thompson PR (2019) Protein arginine deiminases (PADs): biochemistry and chemical biology of protein
citrullination. *Acc Chem Res* 52:818–832. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00024

51. Lewis HD, Liddle J, Coote JE et al (2015) Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human net formation. *Nat Chem Biol* 11:189–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1735

52. Aliko A, Kamińska M, Falkowski K et al (2019) Discovery of novel potential reversible peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibitor. *Int J Mol Sci* 20:2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092174

53. Bicker KL, Thompson PR (2012) The protein arginine deiminases: structure, function, inhibition, and disease. *Biopolymers* 99:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22127

54. Knuckley B, Causey CP, Jones JE et al (2010) Substrate specificity and kinetic studies of pads 1, 3, and 4 identify potent and selective inhibitors of protein arginine deiminase 3. *Biochemistry* 49:4852–4863. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi100363t

55. Knuckley B, Bhatia M, Thompson PR (2007) Protein arginine deiminase 4: evidence for a reverse protonation mechanism. *Biochemistry* 46:6578–6587. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi700095s

56. Luo Y, Arita K, Bhatia M et al (2006) Inhibitors and inactivators of protein arginine deiminase 4: functional and structural characterization. *Biochemistry* 45:11727–11736. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi061180d

57. Luo Y, Knuckley B, Lee Y-H et al (2006) A fluoroacetamidine-based inactivator of protein arginine deiminase 4: design, synthesis, and *in vitro* and *in vivo* evaluation. *J Am Chem Soc* 128:1092–1093. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0576233

58. Biron BM, Chung C-S, O'Brien XM et al (2016) CL-amidine prevents histone 3 citrullination and neutrophil extracellular trap formation, and improves survival in a murine sepsis model. *J Innate Immun* 9:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448808

59. Willis VC, Gizinski AM, Banda NK et al (2011) N-α-benzoyl-N5-(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)-l-ornithine amide, a protein arginine deiminase inhibitor, reduces the severity of murine collagen-induced arthritis. *J Immunol* 186:4396–4404. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1001620

60. Causey CP, Jones JE, Slack JL et al (2011) The development of N-α-(2-carboxyl)benzoyl-N5-(2-fluoro-1-iminoethyl)-l-ornithine amide (O-F-amidine) and N-α-(2-carboxyl)benzoyl-N5-(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)-l-ornithine amide (O-cl-amidine) as second generation protein arginine Deiminase (PAD) inhibitors. *J Med Chem* 54:6919–6935. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm2008985

61. Knight JS, Subramanian V, O'Dell AA et al (2014) Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition disrupts net formation and protects against kidney, skin and vascular disease in lupus-prone MRL/LPR mice. *Ann Rheum Dis* 74:2199–2206. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205365

62. Muth A, Subramanian V, Beaumont E et al (2017) Development of a selective inhibitor of protein arginine deiminase 2. *J Med Chem* 7:3198–3211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00274.s002

63. Teo CY, Shave S, Thean Chor AL et al (2012) Discovery of a new class of inhibitors for the protein arginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) by structure-based virtual screening. *BMC Bioinform.* https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-s17-s4

64. Kosgodage US, Matewele P, Mastroianni G et al (2019) Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitors reduce bacterial membrane vesicle release and sensitize bacteria to antibiotic treatment. *Front Cell Infect Microbiol.* https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00227

65. Moscarello MA, Lei H, Mastronardi FG et al (2013) Inhibition of peptidyl-arginine deiminases reverses protein-hypercitrullination and disease in mouse models of multiple sclerosis. *Dis Model Mech.* https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.010520

66. Forsgren A, Schmeling D, Quie PG (1974) Effect of tetracycline on the phagocytic function of human leukocytes. *J Infect Dis* 130:412–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/130.4.412

67. Mangat P, Wegner N, Venables PJ, Potempa J (2010) Bacterial and human peptidylarginine deiminases: targets for inhibiting the autoimmune response in rheumatoid arthritis? *Arthritis Res Ther* 12:209. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3000

68. Lewallen DM, Bicker KL, Madoux F et al (2014) A Fluopol-ABPP PAD2 high-throughput screen identifies the first calcium site inhibitor targeting the pads. *ACS Chem Biol* 9:913–921. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb400841k

69. Surolia R, Li FJ, Wang Z et al (2021) NETosis in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury following cutaneous chemical burns. *JCI Insight*. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.147564

70. Zhou Y, An L-L, Chaerkady R et al (2018) Evidence for a direct link between PAD4-mediated citrullination and the oxidative burst in human neutrophils. *Sci Rep*. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33385-z

71. Koushik S, Joshi N, Nagaraju S et al (2017) PAD4: Pathophysiology, current therapeutics and future perspective in rheumatoid arthritis. *Expert Opin Ther Targets* 21:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2017.1294160

72. Lazo JS, Nemoto K, Pestell KE et al (2002) Identification of a potent and selective pharmacophore for CDC25 dual specificity phosphatase inhibitors. *Mol Pharmacol* 61:720–728. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.61.4.720

73. Dubey N, Peng B-Y, Lin C-M et al (2018) NSC95397 suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells through MKP-1 and the ERK1/2 pathway. *Int J Mol Sci* 19:1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061625

74. Dreyton CJ, Anderson ED, Subramanian V et al (2014) Insights into the mechanism of streptonigrin-induced protein arginine deiminase inactivation. *Bioorg Med Chem* 22:1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.12.064

75. Stone EM, Schaller TH, Bianchi H et al (2005) Inactivation of two diverse enzymes in the amidinotransferase superfamily by 2-chloroacetamidine: dimethylargininase and peptidylarginine deiminase. *Biochemistry* 44:13744–13752. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi051341y

76. Dreyton CJ, Jones JE, Knuckley BA, Subramanian V, Anderson ED, Brown SJ, Fernandez-Vega V, Eberhart C, Spicer T, Zuhl AM, Ferguson J, Speers AE, Wang C, Boger DL, Thompson P, Cravatt BF, Hodder P, Rosen H (2012) Optimization and characterization of a pan protein arginine deiminase (PAD) inhibitor. *Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program*

77. Zhao X, Gu C, Wang Y (2020) PAD4 selective inhibitor TDFA protects lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by modulating nuclear p65 localization in epithelial cells. *Int Immunopharmacol* 88:106923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106923

78. Jones JE, Slack JL, Fang P et al (2011) Synthesis and screening of a haloacetamidine containing library to identify PAD4 selective inhibitors. *ACS Chem Biol* 7:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb200258q

79. Makryiannakis D, af Klint E, Lundberg IE, et al (2006) Citrullination is an inflammation-dependent process. *Ann Rheum Dis* 65:1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.049403

80. Nguyen H, James EA (2016) Immune recognition of citrullinated epitopes. *Immunology* 149:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12640

81. Wegner N, Lundberg K, Kinloch A et al (2010) Autoimmunity to specific citrullinated proteins gives the first clues to the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. *Immunol Rev* 233:34–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00850.x

82. Dragoni G, De Hertogh G, Vermeire S (2020) The role of citrullination in inflammatory bowel disease: a neglected player
in triggering inflammation and fibrosis? Inflamm Bowel Dis 27:134-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaa095

83. Ishida-Yamamoto A, Takahashi H, Iizuka H et al (2000) Decreased deiminated keratin K1 in psoriatic hyperproliferative epidermis. J Investig Dermatol 114:701-705. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00936.x

84. Mastronardi FG, Noor A, Wood DD et al (2007) Peptidyl arginine deiminase 2 CPG island in multiple sclerosis white matter is hypomethylated. J Neurosci Res 85:2006-2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21329

85. Calabrese R, Zampieri M, Mechelli R et al (2011) Methylation-dependent PAD2 upregulation in multiple sclerosis peripheral blood. Mult Scler J 18:299-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511421055

86. Messerer DA, Schmidt H, Frick M, Huber-Lang M (2021) Ion and water transport in neutrophil granulocytes and its impairment during sepsis. Int J Mol Sci 22:1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041699

87. DeLeo FR, Allen L-AH (2020) Phagocytosis and neutrophil extracellular traps. Faculty Rev. https://doi.org/10.12703/r/9-25

88. Scapini P, Cassatella MA (2014) Social networking of human neutrophils within the immune system. Blood 124:710-719. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-03-453217

89. Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL et al (2012) Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev Immunol 30:459-489. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074942

90. Brinkmann V (2004) Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303:1532-1535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092385

91. Mutua V, Gershwin LJ (2020) A review of neutrophil extracellular traps (nets) in disease: potential anti-nets therapeutics. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-020-08804-7

92. Hoeksema M, Tripathi S, White M et al (2015) Arginine-rich histones have strong antiviral activity for influenza a viruses. Innate Immun 21:736-745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425915593794

93. Liu X, Arfman T, Wichapong K et al (2021) Pad4 takes charge during neutrophil activation: Impact of PAD4 mediated net formation on immune-mediated disease. J Thromb Haemost 19:1607-1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15313

94. Wang Y, Li M, Stadler S et al (2009) Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Exp Med 206:i1-i1. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem2062oia1

95. Ward PA, Fattahi F (2019) New strategies for treatment of infectious sepsis. J Leukoc Biol 106:187-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.4mir1118-425r

96. Jiang D, Saffarzadeh M, Scharfetter-Kochanek K (2017) In vitro demonstration and quantification of neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Bio Protoc. https://doi.org/10.21769/bioprotoc.2386

97. Neeli I, Khan SN, Radic M (2008) Histone deimination as a response to inflammatory stimuli in neutrophils. J Immunol 180:1895-1902. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1895

98. Hasler P, Giaglis S, Hahn S (2016) Neutrophil extracellular traps in health and disease. Swiss Med Wkly. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14352

99. Bawadekar M, Shim D, Johnson CJ et al (2017) Peptidylarginine deiminase 2 is required for tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced citrullination and arthritis, but not neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Autoimmun 80:39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2017.01.006

100. Holmes CL, Shim D, Kernien J et al (2019) Insight into neutrophil extracellular trap extracellular traps through systematic

evaluation of citrullination and peptidylarginine deiminases. J Immunol Res 2019:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2160192

101. Cush J (2021) Rheumatoid arthritis: early diagnosis and treatment. Med Clin North Am 105:355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.10.006

102. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ (2020) The immunology of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Immunol 22:10-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00816-x

103. Thomas R, Cope AP (2013) Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Oxf Med Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199642489.003.0109

104. Damgaard D, Senolt L, Nielsen CH (2016) Increased levels of peptidylarginine deiminase 2 in synovial fluid from Anti-ccp-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients: association with disease activity and inflammatory markers. Rheumatology 55:918-927. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev440

105. Kurowska W, Kuca-Warnawin EH, Radzikowska A, Maśliński W (2017) The role of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Central Eur J Immunol 42:390-398. https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2017.72807

106. Trouw LA, Haisma EM, Levarht EW et al (2009) Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies from rheumatoid arthritis patients activate complement via both the classical and alternative pathways. Arthritis Rheum 60:1923-1931. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24622

107. Sokolove J, Zhao X, Chandra PE, Robinson WH (2010) Immune complexes containing citrullinated fibrinogen co-stimulate macrophages Via Toll-like receptor 4 and cagy receptor. Arthritis Rheum 63:53-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30081

108. Lu M-C, Yu H-C (2019) The roles of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Tzu Chi Med J 31:5. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_116_18

109. Fan LY, He DY, Wang Q et al (2012) Citrullinated vimentin stimulates proliferation, pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, and PADi4 and RANKL expression of fibroblast-like synovocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 41:354-358. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2012.670263

110. Song W, Ye J, Pan N et al (2021) Neutrophil extracellular traps tied to rheumatoid arthritis: points to ponder. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.578129

111. Chirivi RG, van Rosmalen JW, van der Linden M et al (2020) Therapeutic ACPA inhibits net formation: a potential therapy for neutrophil-mediated inflammatory diseases. Cell Mol Immunol 18:1528-1544. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0381-3

112. Clarke J (2020) Regulatory eosinophils to the rescue. Nat Rev Rheumatol 17:68-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-00564-0

113. Zhou X, Motta F, Selmi C et al (2021) Antibody glycosylation in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 20:102804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102804

114. Rombouts Y, Ewing E, van de Stadt LA et al (2013) Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies acquire a pro-inflammatory FC glycosylation phenotype prior to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 74:234-241. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrh.eumdis-2013-203565

115. Rombouts Y, Willemze A, van Beers JJ et al (2015) Extensive glycosylation of ACPA-IGG variable domains modulates binding to citrullinated antigens in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 75:578-585. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206598

116. Hafkenscheid L, Bondt A, Scherer HU et al (2017) Structural analysis of variable domain glycosylation of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis reveals the presence of highly sialylated glycans. Mol Cell Proteomics 16:278-287. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m116.062919
117. Ghasemi N, Razavi S, Nikzad E (2017) Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnoses and cell-based therapy. Cell J 19(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2016.4867

118. McDonald WI, Ron MA (1999) Multiple sclerosis: the disease and its manifestations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1615–1622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0506

119. Huang W-J, Chen W-W, Zhang X (2017) Multiple sclerosis: pathology, diagnosis and treatments. Exp Ther Med 13:3163–3166. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4410

120. Nourbakhsh B, Mowry EM (2019) Multiple sclerosis risk factors and pathogenesis. Contin Lifelong Learn Neurol 25:596–610. https://doi.org/10.1212/con.0000000000000725

121. Koch MW, Metz LM, Kovalchuk O (2012) Epigenetic changes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 9:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.226

122. Shaikh MF, Jordan N, D'Cruz DP (2017) Systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Med 17:78–83. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-1-78

123. Sherer Y, Gorstein A, Fritzler MJ, Shoenfeld Y (2004) Autoantibody explosion in systemic lupus erythematosus: more than 100 different antibodies found in SLE patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34:501–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.07.002

124. Liu Y, Lightfoot YL, Seto N et al (2018) Peptidylarginine deiminases 2 and 4 modulate innate and adaptive immune responses in TLR-7-dependent lupus. JCI Insight 3(23):e124729. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124729

125. Hu SC-S, Yu H-S, Yen F-L et al (2016) Neutrophil extracellular trap formation is increased in psoriasis and induces human β-defensin-2 production in epidermal keratinocytes. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31119

126. Chavanas S, Méchin M-C, Nachat R et al (2006) Peptidylarginine deiminases and deimination in biology and pathology: Relevance to skin homeostasis. J Dermatol Sci 44:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2006.07.004

127. Valdimarsson H, Bake BS, Jónsdótdir I, Fry L (1986) Psoriasis: a disease of abnormal keratinocyte proliferation induced by T lymphocytes. Immunol Today 7:256–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(86)90005-8

128. Pohla L, Ottas A, Kaldvee B et al (2020) Hyperproliferation is the main driver of metabolomic changes in psoriasis lesional skin. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59996-z

129. Benhadou F, Mintoff D, del Marmol V (2018) Psoriasis: keratinocytes or immune cells—which is the trigger? Dermatology 235:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495291

130. Méchin M-C, Takahara H, Simon M (2020) De minimation and peptidylarginine deiminases in skin physiology and diseases. Int J Mol Sci 21:566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020566

131. Watanabe S, Iwata Y, Fukushima H et al (2020) Neutrophil extracellular traps are induced in a psoriasis model of interleukin-36 receptor antagonist-deficient mice. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76864-y

132. Olsen I, Yamazaki K (2019) Can oral bacteria affect the microbiome of the gut? J Oral Microbiol 11:1586422. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1586422

133. González-Febles J, Rodríguez-Lozano B, Sánchez-Piedra C et al (2020) Association between periodontitis and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-2121-6

134. Dissick A, Redman RS, Jones M et al (2010) Association of periodontitis with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study. J Periodontol 81:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090309

135. Laugisch O, Wong A, Sroka A et al (2015) Citrullination in the periodontium—a possible link between periodontitis and

rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Oral Invest 20:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1556-7

136. Janssen KM, Hop H, Vissink A et al (2020) Levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor, including IgA Isotypes, and articular manifestations in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:8054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218054

137. Chumanevich AA, Causey CP, Knuckley BA et al (2011) Suppression of colitis in mice by Cl-amidine a novel peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitor. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00435.2010

138. Kang CP, Lee H-S, Ju H et al (2005) A functional haplotype of the PADI4 gene associated with increased rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility in Koreans. Arthritis Rheum 54:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21536

139. Howell KJ, Kraiczy J, Nayak KM et al (2018) Dna methylation and transcription patterns in intestinal epithelial cells from pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases differentiate disease subtypes and associate with outcome. Gastroenterology 154:585–598. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.007

140. Dragoni G, Innocenti T, Galli A (2020) Biomarkers of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease: How long before abandoning single-marker approaches? Dig Dis 39:190–203. https://doi.org/10.1159/000511641

141. Dinallo V, Marafini I, Di Fusco D et al (2019) Neutrophil extracellular traps sustain inflammatory signals in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 13:772–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy215

142. Li T, Wang C, Liu Y et al (2019) Neutrophil extracellular traps induce intestinal damage and thrombotic tendency in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 14:240–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz132

143. Drury B, Hardisty G, Gray RD, G-tzer Ho (2021) Neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammatory bowel disease: pathogenic mechanisms and clinical translation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.03.002

144. Liu Y-C, Kuo R-L, Shih S-R (2020) COVID-19: the first documented coronavirus pandemic in history. Biomed J 43:328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.04.007

145. Caggiano G, Castelnuovo E, Kima R (2020) The global effects of covid-19-induced uncertainty. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3598710

146. Verma P, Dumka A, Bhardwaj A et al (2021) A statistical analysis of impact of covid19 on the global economy and stock index returns. SN Comp Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00410-w

147. Grant MC, Geoghegan L, Arbyn M et al (2020) The prevalence of symptoms in 24,410 adults infected by the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2; COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 148 studies from 9 countries. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582819

148. Esakandari H, Nabi-Afjadi M, Fakkari-Afjadi J et al (2020) A comprehensive review of COVID-19 characteristics. Biol Procedures Online. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-020-00128-2

149. W-jie G, Ni Z-yi HuY et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382:1708–1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2002032

150. Cavalier E, Guiot J, Lechner K et al (2021) Circulating nucleosomes as potential markers to monitor COVID-19 disease progression. Front Mol Biosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.600881

151. Sen R, Garbati M, Bryant K, Lu Y (2021) Epigenetic mechanisms influencing COVID-19. Genome 64:372–385. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2020-0135
152. Middleton EA, He X-Y, Denorme F et al (2020) Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood 136:1169-1179. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020007008

153. Skendros P, Mitsios A, Chrysanthopoulou A et al (2020) Complement and tissue factor-enriched neutrophil extracellular traps are key drivers in COVID-19 immunothrombosis. J Clin Invest 130(11):6151-6157. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.15.20131029

154. Arisan ED, Uysal-Onganer P, Lange S (2020) Putative roles for peptidylarginine deiminases in COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci 21:4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134662

155. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A et al (2021) Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med 27:601-615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z

156. Perrot L, Hemon M, Busnel J-M et al (2021) First flare of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis after SARS-COV-2 infection. Lancet Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30396-9

157. Li FJ, Surolia R, Li H et al (2020) Citrullinated vimentin generated by cadmium/carbon black exposure mediates lung fibrosis C58 acute lung injury: atypical triggers. Am J Respir Crit Care 201:A5555. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2020.201.1_meetingabstracts.a5555

158. Yao H, Li P, Venters BJ et al (2008) Histone Arg modifications and p53 regulate the expression of ok138, a mediator of apoptosis. J Biol Chem 283:20060-20068. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m802940200

159. Li P, Yao H, Zhang Z et al (2008) Regulation of p53 target gene expression by peptidylarginine deiminase 4. Mol Cell Biol 28:4745-4758. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01747-07

160. Zhu D, Zhang Y, Wang S (2021) Histone citrullination: a new target for tumors. Mol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01373-z

161. Chang X, Han J (2006) Expression of peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) in various tumors. Mol Carcinog 45:183-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.20169

162. Chang X, Han J, Pang L et al (2009) Increased PADI4 expression in blood and tissues of patients with malignant tumors. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-40

163. Wang L, Song G, Zhang X et al (2017) PADI2-mediated Citrullination promotes prostate cancer progression. Can Res 77:5755-5768. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0150

164. De Leo F (2020) Faculty opinions recommendation of citrullinated histone H3, a biomarker for neutrophil extracellular trap formation, predicts the risk of mortality in patients with cancer. Fac Opin Post-Publ Peer Rev Biomed Literature. https://doi.org/10.3410/f.735526100.793580550

165. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D et al (2010) Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:15880-15885. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005743107

166. Martinod K, Wagner DD (2014) Thrombosis: tangled up in nets. Blood 123:2768-2776. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-10-463646

167. Leshner M, Wang S, Lewis C et al (2012) PAD4 mediated histone hypercitrullination induces heterochromatin decondensation and chromatin unfolding to form neutrophil extracellular trap-like structures. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00307

168. Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR et al (2010) Pad4 is essential for anti-bacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 207:1853-1862. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20100239

169. Martinod K, Demers M, Fuchs TA et al (2013) Neutrophil histone modification by peptidylarginine deiminase 4 is critical for

deep vein thrombosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:8674-8679. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301059110

170. Al-Shukaili A, Al-Ghafri S, Al-Marhoobi S, Alkaabi J (2012) Evaluation of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor in Omani patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheumatol 2012:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/285854

171. Kadura S, Raghu G (2021) Rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease: manifestations and current concepts in pathogenesis and management. Eur Respir Rev 30:210011. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0011-2021

172. Tymms K, Butcher B, Smith T et al (2021) Impact of anti-citrullinated protein antibody on tumor necrosis factor inhibitor or abatacept response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol 8:67-72. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2020.20024

173. Moreland LW, Alten R, Van Den Bosch F et al (2002) Costimulatory blockade in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot, dose-finding, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating Ctla-4ig and LEA29Y eighty five days after the first infusion. Arthritis Rheum 46:1470-1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10294

174. Westhovens R, Kremer J, Moreland L et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate: a 5-year extended phase Iib study. J Rheumatol 36:736-742. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080813

175. Kremer JM, Peterfy C, Russell AS et al (2014) Long-term safety, efficacy, and inhibition of structural damage progression over 5 years of treatment with Abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Abatacept in Inadequate responders to methotrexate trial. J Rheumatol 41:1077-1087. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130263

176. Chen HA, Lin KC, Chen CH, Liao HT, Wang HP, Chang HN, Tsai CY, Chou CT (2006) The effect of etanercept on anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:35-39. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.038851

177. Chou C-T (2006) The clinical application of etanercept in Chinese patients with rheumatic disease. Mod Rheumatol 16:206-213. https://doi.org/10.3109/s10165-006-0486-2

178. Anquetil F, Clavel C, Offer G et al (2015) IgM and IgA rheumatoid factors purified from rheumatoid arthritis sera boost the Fc receptor and complement-dependent effector functions of the disease-specific anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies. J Immunol 194:3664-3674. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402334

179. Lu M-C, Lai N-S, Yu H-C et al (2010) Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies bind surface-expressed citrullinated Grp78 on monocytes/macrophages and stimulate tumor necrosis factor A production. Arthritis Rheum 62:1213-1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27386

180. Harre U, Georgess D, Bang H et al (2012) Induction of osteoclastogenesis and bone loss by human autoantibodies against citrullinated vimentin. J Clin Investig 122:1791-1802. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci60975

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.