# Enhanced Adhesion of Campylobacter jejuni to Abiotic Surfaces Is Mediated by Membrane Proteins in Oxygen-Enriched Conditions

Sheiam Sulaeman, Mathieu Hernould, Annick Schaumann, Laurent Coquet, Jean-Michel Bolla, Emmanuelle Dé, Odile Tresse

► To cite this version:

Sheiam Sulaeman, Mathieu Hernould, Annick Schaumann, Laurent Coquet, Jean-Michel Bolla, et al. Enhanced Adhesion of Campylobacter jejuni to Abiotic Surfaces Is Mediated by Membrane Proteins in Oxygen-Enriched Conditions. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (9), pp.e46402. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046402. hal-02334086

HAL Id: hal-02334086

https://hal.science/hal-02334086v1

Submitted on 29 Nov 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
# Enhanced Adhesion of *Campylobacter jejuni* to Abiotic Surfaces Is Mediated by Membrane Proteins in Oxygen-Enriched Conditions

Sheiam Sulaeman¹,², Mathieu Hernould¹,², Annick Schaumann³, Laurent Coquet³, Jean-Michel Bolla⁴, Emmanuelle Dé³, Odile Tresse¹,²*

1 INRA UMR1014 SECALIM, Nantes, France, 2 LUNAM Université, Oniris, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 3 Université de Rouen, Laboratoire Polymères Biopolymères Surfaces, UMR 6270 and FR 3038 CNRS, IFRMP23, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France, 4 UMR-MD1, Université de Aix-Marseille, IRBA, Facultés de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Marseille, France

## Abstract

*Campylobacter jejuni* is responsible for the major foodborne bacterial enteritis in humans. In contradiction with its fastidious growth requirements, this microaerobic pathogen can survive in aerobic food environments, suggesting that it must employ a variety of protection mechanisms to resist oxidative stress. For the first time, *C. jejuni* 81–176 inner and outer membrane subproteomes were analyzed separately using two-dimensional protein electrophoresis (2-DE) of oxygen-acclimated cells and microaerobically grown cells. LC-MS/MS analyses successfully identified 42 and 25 spots which exhibited a significantly altered abundance in the IMP-enriched fraction and in the OMP-enriched fraction, respectively, in response to oxidative conditions. These spots corresponded to 38 membrane proteins that could be grouped into different functional classes: (i) transporters, (ii) chaperones, (iii) fatty acid metabolism, (iv) adhesion/virulence and (v) other metabolisms. Some of these proteins were up-regulated at the transcriptional level in oxygen-acclimated cells as confirmed by qRT-PCR. Downstream analyses revealed that adhesion of *C. jejuni* to inert surfaces and swarming motility were enhanced in oxygen-acclimated cells or paraquat-stressed cells, which could be explained by the higher abundance of membrane proteins involved in adhesion and biofilm formation. The virulence factor CadF, over-expressed in the outer membrane of oxygen-acclimated cells, contributes to the complex process of *C. jejuni* adhesion to inert surfaces as revealed by a reduction in the capability of *C. jejuni* 81–176 Δ*CadF* cells compared to the isogenic strain. Taken together, these data demonstrate that oxygen-enriched conditions promote the over-expression of membrane proteins involved in both the biofilm initiation and virulence of *C. jejuni*.

**Citation:** Sulaeman S, Hernould M, Schaumann A, Coquet L, Bolla J-M, et al. (2012) Enhanced Adhesion of *Campylobacter jejuni* to Abiotic Surfaces Is Mediated by Membrane Proteins in Oxygen-Enriched Conditions. PLoS ONE 7(9): e46402. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402

**Editor:** Markus M. Heimesaat, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Germany

**Received** April 24, 2012; **Accepted** August 31, 2012; **Published** September 28, 2012

**Copyright:** © 2012 Sulaeman et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Funding:** This research was funded by the Pays de la Loire region (France) through the project GENICAMP. Sheiam Sulaeman was the recipient of a Syrian fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: odile.tresse@oniris-nantes.fr

## Introduction

*Campylobacter* is one of the major causative agents of foodborne gastrointestinal bacterial infections worldwide. The human disease caused by *Campylobacter*, namely campylobacteriosis, is mostly due to the Gram-negative spiral-shaped *C. jejuni* [1]. This foodborne disease is characterized by reported symptoms including fever, abdominal cramps, bloody diarrhea, dizziness and myalgia [2]. Although such infections tend to be self-limiting, syndromes such as Guillain-Barré and Miller Fisher can be late-onset complications [3]. This enteric pathogen is also a suspected etiological factor in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [1,4]. *C. jejuni* is one of the principal causes of hospitalization for foodborne illness in the USA [5]. In a comparison of 168 pathogen-food combinations for 14 leading pathogens across 12 food categories representing over 95% of the annual illnesses and hospitalizations in the USA, the combination *Campylobacter*-poultry reached the first rank in terms of annual disease burden including illness, hospitalizations, deaths and costs [6]. A baseline survey conducted in 28 European

countries also indicated that the prevalence of *Campylobacter*-colonized broiler batches and *Campylobacter*-contaminated broiler carcasses was 71.2% and 75.8%, respectively [7] which constitutes the main reservoir for human campylobacteriosis. Although this obligate microaerobic pathogen has fastidious growth requirements [8], *C. jejuni* can survive, paradoxically, in food products challenging food processing, conservation and preparation conditions [9]. During these processes, *C. jejuni* is exposed to highly variable oxygen concentrations suggesting that it must develop protective mechanisms to resist oxidative stress [10]. Oxidative stress leads to the degradation and modulation of protein functions and results in lipid and DNA damage [11–13]. Kaakoush *et al.* (2007) [14] have shown that *C. jejuni* strains have different oxygen tolerances. A cross-protection between low temperature and oxidative stress in *C. jejuni* strains from various origins has been reported by Garénaux *et al.* (2008) [15]. *Campylobacter* is probably also inactivated by an oxidative burst when high pressure treatment is applied [16]. Moreover, oxidative stress and redox-
related proteins were found to be over-expressed in *C. jejuni* stressed with paraquat, a strong oxidizing agent [17].

In *Campylobacter* spp., oxygen is required as a terminal electron acceptor for respiration [18] and the genes described in other Gram-negative bacteria for oxidative stress and general stress responses are lacking [19,20]. *C. jejuni* encodes only a few enzymes in oxidative defense, including a superoxide dismutase (SodB), an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) and a catalase (KatA) [21–23] for which the molecular and gene regulation mechanisms are still poorly understood [24]. *C. jejuni*, unlike other foodborne pathogens, lacks the key regulators of oxidative stress defense enzymes known in *E. coli* and *S. typhimurium* as SoxRS and OxyR regulons [25]. However, it has been shown that alternative regulators, termed Fur and PerR, mediate at least part of the response to oxidative stress in *Campylobacter* by repressing both AhpC and KatA expression [22,26]. More recently, two other regulators have been found to be involved in the oxidative stress response [15,27,28]. *C. jejuni* also encodes other antioxidant enzymes, such as the thiolperoxidases (Tpx) and the bacterioferri- tin co-migratory protein (Bcp), which together play a role in the protection of *C. jejuni* against oxidative stress [29,30]. Hofreuter *et al.* [31] have also indicated that the strain *C. jejuni* 81–176 has an additional DMSO reductase system which may be important for respiration in oxygen-restricted conditions. Respiration is a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating process initiated in the microbial membrane. However, no overall approach has yet been used to identify *C. jejuni* membrane proteins involved in the response to oxidative conditions.

As the membrane is the first bacterial line of defense against environmental stresses, proteomic analyses at the membrane level of *C. jejuni* in oxygen-enriched conditions were explored. In the present study, *C. jejuni* inner and outer membrane subproteomes were characterized using two-dimensional protein electrophoresis (2-DE) on oxygen-acclimated cells and oxygen non-acclimated cells and were related to the capability of *C. jejuni* to adhere to abiotic surfaces.

## Results

### *C. jejuni* 81–176 and NCTC 11168 under oxygen acclimation conditions

As *C. jejuni* 81–176 and NCTC 11168 could not survive in atmospheric air, a specific gas mixture was used to explore its oxygen acclimation response. Oxygen acclimation was performed using the same gas mixture for optimal growth (5% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 85% N₂) but with a higher oxygen concentration (19% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 71% N₂) on growing cells. The presence of blood did not change the colony-forming capability of for both strains. This is not surprising as red blood corpuscles contained in blood are able to capture dioxygen. On blood-free plates, almost twice as much time was necessary for the development of *C. jejuni* 81–176 colonies under oxygen-acclimation conditions compared to microaerobic conditions while the same number of colonies could not be reached by NCTC11168 in these conditions (Table 1). Consequently, *C. jejuni* 81–176 strain was used for further experiments. An identical number of colonies in both conditions was retrieved for subsequent proteomic analyses of each of the membranes of *C. jejuni*.

### Separation of membrane proteins of *C. jejuni* 81–176

Analyzing membrane proteins using 2-DE is complex due to the difficulty in extracting and solubilizing the inherently hydrophobic proteins [32]. The most efficient and reproducible membrane separation for *Campylobacter* was obtained using the method based

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Time required to reach at least 250 colonies in microaerobic and oxygen enriched conditions for three strains of *C. jejuni* grown on Columbia blood agar plates (CBA) and Columbia blood-free agar (CA) plates from a 100 µL spread inoculum of a 10⁵ diluted culture.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th>C. jejuni NCTC<br>11168</th><th>C. jejuni 81–176</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">CBA</td><td>5% O₂, 10% CO₂,<br>85% N₂</td><td>15 h</td><td>15 h</td></tr><tr><td>19% O₂, 10% CO₂,<br>71% N₂</td><td>15 h</td><td>15 h</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">CA</td><td>5% O₂, 10% CO₂,<br>85% N₂</td><td>24 h</td><td>24 h</td></tr><tr><td>19% O₂, 10% CO₂,<br>71% N₂</td><td>>63 h</td><td>42 h</td></tr></tbody></table>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.t001

on lauryl-sarcosinate detergent rather than sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation or spheroplasting by lysozyme (data not shown) as already observed previously [33–35]. The lauryl-sarcosinate activity enables two fractions to be obtained, a lauryl-sarcosinate-insoluble fraction enriched in outer membrane proteins (OMPs) and a lauryl-sarcosinate-soluble fraction enriched in inner membrane proteins (IMPs). As different concentrations of lauryl sarcosinate were previously used on *C. jejuni* (0.2% in Asakura *et al.* [33], 1% in Hobb *et al.* [35] and 2% in Leon-Kempis *et al.* [34]), the lowest efficient concentration was determined to prevent any interference during protein electrofocalization (Fig. 1). From a 0.5% detergent concentration, outer and inner membrane profiles were clearly distinguished and the identification of the main OMPs of *C. jejuni* in the lauryl-sarcosinate-insoluble fraction (FlaA, PorA-MOMP and CadF) confirmed the expected IMP-OMP separation. The lowest concentration of lauryl sarcosinate required to obtain the optimal separation of IMPs and OMPs was thus selected for subsequent 2D-electrophoresis experiments to prevent interference during protein electrofocalisation.

### Membrane subproteome variations in oxygen acclimation conditions

The differences between the 2D-electrophoretic profiles obtained from oxygen-acclimated cells and microaerobically grown cells were validated by PCA (cf. Fig. S1). Then, LC-MS/MS analyses successfully identified 42 and 25 spots which exhibited a significantly altered abundance in the IMP-enriched fraction and in the OMP-enriched fraction, respectively (Fig. 2, Table 2). Several of these spots contained the same protein (e.g. the FlaA protein with 12 pI variants or CadF with 3 pI variants). The same observation was made previously on the whole envelope of *C. jejuni* JHH1 studied by Cordwell *et al.* [36]. Finally, a total of 23 higher-abundance proteins and 15 lower-abundance proteins in oxygen-acclimated cells as compared to the control were identified. The localization of these proteins in their cellular compartment was predicted using the algorithm PSORTb v.3.0.2 (Table 2). PSORTb returns a list of the five localization sites for Gram-negative bacteria (cytoplasm, inner membrane, periplasm, outer membrane and extracellular space) and the associated probability value for each. Several proteins were predicted in the cytoplasmic compartment and could thus be regarded as contaminant proteins. This was expected as methods used for membrane fractionation do not separate exclusively membrane proteins [37,38]. In fact, some of the predicted cytoplasmic proteins have already been described
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Membrane protein fractions of *C. jejuni* 81–176 extracted with lauryl sarcosinate at 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2% concentrations and separated using SDS-PAGE. Inner membrane protein-enriched fraction (lauryl-sarcosinate-soluble fraction), outer membrane protein-enriched fraction (lauryl-sarcosinate-insoluble fraction) and cytosolic protein (cytosoluble) profiles are presented. Molecular masses (MM) are indicated on the left (kDa). Identified proteins in the sarcosinate-insoluble fraction are indicated on the right.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.g001</figcaption></figure>

in membrane analysis such as the chaperone proteins GroEL, DnaJ, DnaK, [39] or the elongation factor EF-Tu [39–43]. Apart from the localization of intrinsic or secreted proteins being well predicted by the PSORTb algorithm due to their specific structure (signal peptide, transmembrane alpha helices, beta-barrel proteins, hydrophobicity, motif), the extrinsic proteins associated with the surface of the membranes could not be so easily predicted. This could also explain why some of the proteins predicted in the cytoplasm were found in the enriched membrane protein fractions. To avoid any experimental or prediction biases, only proteins isolated from membrane enriched fractions predicted as membrane, periplasmic or secreted proteins were discussed further. The MOMP represents the major part of proteins in the OMP-enriched fraction, as already reported in previous studies [36]. The over-abundance of one protein could prevent the detection of less abundant proteins. Analyzing the two membranes of *C. jejuni* separately reduced this bias in the IMP-enriched fraction while emphasizing it in the OMP-enriched fraction.

Among the 38 identified proteins whose abundance was modulated by oxidative conditions, four main functional classes were described : (i) transporters that could be involved in the setting up of new catabolic pathways (CjaA/CjaC, LivF, CmeC), (ii) chaperones in response to the oxidative stress (DnaK, GroEL/ S, DnaJ1, ClpB), (iii) proteins involved in fatty acid biosynthesis (AccC) and (iv) proteins involved in the adhesion/virulence of *C. jejuni* 81–176 (FlaA, FlgE, CadF, Cjj_1295, Peb4, CheA, MOMP).

## qRT-PCR analysis of proteins identified in 2-DE

Differently expressed proteins of interest in oxygen-acclimated cells were selected to further investigate their expression patterns at the transcription level (Fig. 3). The selection was based on the most over-expressed proteins *i.e.* above 5.0-fold: the major antigenic peptide Peb4 (5.1-fold), the co-chaperone DnaJ1 (9-fold), Cjj_0854 (7.3-fold) and Cjj_0275 (7.8-fold). Although the identification of two hypothetical proteins could not be statistically validated, they were also selected to assess their expression profile in oxygen-acclimated cells. The protein CadF was selected too as
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) profiles of the inner (A, B) and outer membrane proteins (C, D) of oxygen-acclimated cells (B, D) compared to non-acclimated cells (A, C) of *C. jejuni* 81-176. On profiles A and C, arrows indicate the significant lower-abundance proteins (or protein forms) in oxygen-acclimated cells while on profiles B and D, arrows indicate the significant higher-abundance proteins (or protein forms) in oxygen-acclimated cells. PorA was identified as the major protein on OMP profiles.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.g002</figcaption></figure>

its abundance among cytosoluble proteins has previously been reported as being modulated under paraquat-mediated oxidative stress [15]. The qRT-PCR results indicated that gene expression patterns of the proteins were in accordance with the proteomic-level changes for all proteins. All the genes tested were significantly more transcribed in oxygen-acclimated cells (*P*<0.05). However, the relative mRNA expression level was not proportional to the level of protein abundance for all the genes. For instance,

Cjj_0854 displayed the lowest mRNA expression while the fold was one of the highest recorded (7.3-fold). This may be attributed to the relative stability of the mRNA and proteins or to the differences in regulation mechanisms (such as degradation rates and protein synthesis) that act on both mRNA synthesis and protein synthesis, and ultimately affect the combined molecular amounts [44].
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Identification and localization prediction (PSORTb v3.0.2) of proteins predominantly modulated by oxygen-acclimated conditions in the IMP and OMP enriched fractions of C. jejuni.</caption><thead><tr><th>Accession number</th><th>Protein ID</th><th>Prot/Spot</th><th>P-value*</th><th>n-Fold</th><th>p/MW</th><th>Mascot score</th><th>NMP/Pc</th><th>Fraction localization</th><th>Cell localization prediction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Transporters</strong></td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612178</td><td>CjaA protein</td><td>CjaA-1</td><td>0.003</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>799</td><td>29/66%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>putative amino acid</td><td>CjaA-2</td><td>0.009</td><td>up2.2</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>699</td><td>22/65%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>transporter</td><td>CjaA-3</td><td>0.002</td><td>up1.9</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>339</td><td>14/55%</td><td>OM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>[surface antigen CjaA]</td><td>CjaA-4</td><td>0.008</td><td>up2.4</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>358</td><td>13/54%</td><td>OM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>CjaA-5</td><td>0.006</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>865</td><td>32/75%</td><td>OM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>CjaA-6</td><td>0.005</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.69/30949</td><td>485</td><td>18/55%</td><td>OM</td><td>PP/IM</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612379</td><td>histidine-binding protein HisJ (surface antigen CjaC) CjaC protein</td><td>CjaC</td><td></td><td>do2.4</td><td>6.48/27781</td><td>376</td><td>10/34%</td><td>OM</td><td>PP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613528</td><td>high affinity branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein</td><td>LivF</td><td>0.002</td><td>do2.3</td><td>7.03/25739</td><td>510</td><td>16/58%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612467</td><td>outer membrane lipoprotein CmeC RND efflux system,</td><td>CmeC-1</td><td>0.01</td><td>do1.7</td><td>5.14/55385</td><td>598</td><td>13/29%</td><td>OM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>CmeC-2</td><td>0.003</td><td>do1.9</td><td>5.14/55385</td><td>526</td><td>12/27%</td><td>OM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Chaperones</strong></td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612249</td><td>chaperonin GroEL</td><td>GroEL-1</td><td>0.0001</td><td>up3.3</td><td>5.02/57934</td><td>945</td><td>27/47%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>GroEL-2</td><td>0.007</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.02/57934</td><td>2350</td><td>68/44%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>GroEL-3</td><td>0.005</td><td>up1.8</td><td>5.02/57934</td><td>1724</td><td>45/55%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612930</td><td>co-chaperonin GroES</td><td>GroES</td><td>0.004</td><td>do2.2</td><td>5.38/9452</td><td>348</td><td>12/87%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613084</td><td>molecular chaperone DnaK</td><td>DnaK</td><td>0.005</td><td>do2.5</td><td>4.98/67403</td><td>206</td><td>6/12%</td><td>OM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612573</td><td>co-chaperone protein DnaJ</td><td>DnaJ1</td><td>0.003</td><td>up9.0</td><td>8.86/33320</td><td>79</td><td>3/10%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613623</td><td>ATP-dependent chaperone protein ClpB</td><td>ClpB-1</td><td>0.004</td><td>do3.5</td><td>5.47/95489</td><td>1802</td><td>56/56%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>ClpB-2</td><td>0.003</td><td>do2.4</td><td>5.47/95489</td><td>1742</td><td>56/52%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>ClpB-3</td><td>0.002</td><td>do2.0</td><td>5.47/95489</td><td>607</td><td>19/22%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>ClpB-4</td><td>0.006</td><td>do2.4</td><td>5.47/95489</td><td>2692</td><td>88/68%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Fatty acid biosynthesis</strong></td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612451</td><td>biotin carboxylase</td><td>AccC_2-1</td><td>0.00001</td><td>do1.8</td><td>6.01/49116</td><td>191</td><td>7/19%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>AccC_2-2</td><td>0.001</td><td>do2.8</td><td>6.01/49116</td><td>165</td><td>5/17%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613559</td><td>putative lipoprotein</td><td>CJJ_0430</td><td>0.01</td><td>up3.3</td><td>5.29/33188</td><td>254</td><td>9/29%</td><td>OM</td><td>unknown</td></tr><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Adhesion/virulence</strong></td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612545</td><td>flagellin</td><td>FlaA-1</td><td>0.00003</td><td>up2.1</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1518</td><td>41/43%</td><td>IM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-2</td><td>0.00006</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1180</td><td>29/43%</td><td>IM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-3</td><td>0.0003</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1694</td><td>45/48%</td><td>IM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-4</td><td>0.0007</td><td>up1.8</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1131</td><td>31/45%</td><td>IM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-5</td><td>0.00001</td><td>up2.1</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1426</td><td>34/40%</td><td>IM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-6</td><td>0.00013</td><td>up1.8</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1383</td><td>33/46%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-7</td><td>0.0004</td><td>up2.7</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>601</td><td>15/36%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-8</td><td>0.0007</td><td>up1.9</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1884</td><td>53/57%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-9</td><td>0.002</td><td>up2.3</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>253</td><td>10/24%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-10</td><td>0.003</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>402</td><td>19/33%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-11</td><td>0.001</td><td>up2.4</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>2379</td><td>67/60%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>FlaA-12</td><td>0.0003</td><td>up3.3</td><td>5.61/59507</td><td>1999</td><td>46/53%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613214</td><td>flagellar hook protein FlgEFlgE-1</td><td></td><td>0.005</td><td>up1.7</td><td>5.14/89392</td><td>915</td><td>30/39%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Cont.</caption><thead><tr><th>Accession number</th><th>Protein ID</th><th>Prot/Spot</th><th>P-value*</th><th>n-Fold</th><th>p/MW</th><th>Mascot score</th><th>NMP/Pc</th><th>Fraction localization</th><th>Cell localization prediction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>gi|121613274</td><td>chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA</td><td>FlgE-2</td><td>0.0006</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.14/89392</td><td>1320</td><td>36/37%</td><td>OM</td><td>EC</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">gi|121612668</td><td rowspan="3">major outer membrane protein (MOMP)</td><td>CheA-1</td><td>0.005</td><td>up2.4</td><td>4.88/85168</td><td>889</td><td>20/28%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>CheA-2</td><td>0.006</td><td>up2.2</td><td>4.88/85168</td><td>370</td><td>11/15%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>CheA-3</td><td>0.0006</td><td>up2.7</td><td>4.88/85168</td><td>451</td><td>13/19%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">gi|121612905</td><td rowspan="2">cell-binding factor 2 major antigenic peptide Peb4 CBF2</td><td>PorA-1</td><td>0.002</td><td>up2.9</td><td>4.72/45681</td><td>281</td><td>8/20%</td><td>IM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td>PorA-2</td><td>0.002</td><td>up1.7</td><td>4.72/45681</td><td>616</td><td>14/38%</td><td>IM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612147</td><td>fibronectin-binding protein</td><td>Cbf2 (Peb4)</td><td>0.00003</td><td>up5.1</td><td>9.23/30411</td><td>479</td><td>19/51%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">gi|121613534</td><td rowspan="3">fibronectin type III domain-containing protein</td><td>CadF-1</td><td>0.004</td><td>up1.7</td><td>5.89/35967</td><td>202</td><td>6/12%</td><td>OM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td>CadF-2</td><td>0.005</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.89/35967</td><td>540</td><td>13/34%</td><td>OM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td>CadF-3</td><td>0.006</td><td>do1.8</td><td>5.89/35967</td><td>235</td><td>6/16%</td><td>OM</td><td>OM</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612430</td><td>elongation factor Tu</td><td>Tuf-1</td><td>0.005</td><td>up1.7</td><td>5.11/43566</td><td>918</td><td>28/48%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">gi|121613042</td><td rowspan="4">serine protease DO</td><td>Tuf-2</td><td>0.009</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.11/43566</td><td>2361</td><td>65/75%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>Tuf-3</td><td>0.004</td><td>do2.2</td><td>5.11/43566</td><td>570</td><td>15/36%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>Tuf-4</td><td>0.001</td><td>up1.7</td><td>5.11/43566</td><td>992</td><td>31/68%</td><td>OM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>HtrA-1</td><td>0.006</td><td>up1.6</td><td>8.97/50985</td><td>1515</td><td>44/61%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">gi|121613659</td><td rowspan="2">malate dehydrogenase</td><td>HtrA-2</td><td>0.009</td><td>up1.7</td><td>8.97/50985</td><td>1626</td><td>50/62%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP</td></tr><tr><td>HtrA-3</td><td>0.00007</td><td>up4.3</td><td>8.97/50985</td><td>475</td><td>15/31%</td><td>IM</td><td>PP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612371</td><td>succinyl-CoA synthase, beta subunit</td><td>Mdh</td><td>0.002</td><td>up2.0</td><td>5.46/33379</td><td>212</td><td>5/19%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612541</td><td>isocitrate dehydrogenase, NADP-dependent</td><td>SucC</td><td>0.006</td><td>do1.7</td><td>5.61/41716</td><td>164</td><td>6/16%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">gi|121612912</td><td rowspan="2">pyruvate kinase</td><td>Icd-1</td><td>0.004</td><td>do2.9</td><td>6.85/86316</td><td>156</td><td>5/9%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>Icd-2</td><td>0.007</td><td>do2.1</td><td>6.85/86316</td><td>954</td><td>27/36%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612884</td><td>arylsulfate sulfotransferase, degenerate</td><td>Pyk</td><td>0.005</td><td>do1.8</td><td>5.89/53751</td><td>485</td><td>16/31%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613032</td><td>mur ligase family protein</td><td>CJJ_0816</td><td>0.01</td><td>do2.3</td><td>9.22/55168</td><td>34</td><td>2/4%</td><td>OM</td><td>unknown</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613329</td><td>tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase</td><td>TyrS</td><td>0.0005</td><td>do3.4</td><td>6.31/45347</td><td>31</td><td>5/16%</td><td>OM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613150</td><td>hypothetical protein CJJ81176_1382</td><td>CJJ_1382</td><td>0.00005</td><td>up3.5</td><td>8.84/26552</td><td>143</td><td>4/23%</td><td>IM</td><td>OM/PP/EC</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613455</td><td>hypothetical protein CJJ81176_0729</td><td>CJJ_0729</td><td>0.006</td><td>up1.6</td><td>5.60/27722</td><td>795</td><td>23/67%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121613526</td><td>7-alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase</td><td>CJJ_0828</td><td>0.001</td><td>up1.8</td><td>6.77/28119</td><td>1025</td><td>35/88%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612484</td><td>hypothetical protein CJJ81176_0854</td><td>CJJ_0854</td><td>0.007</td><td>up7.3</td><td>5.70/36925</td><td>16</td><td>3/11%</td><td>IM</td><td>CytP</td></tr><tr><td>gi|121612647</td><td>hypothetical protein CJJ81176_0275</td><td>CJJ_0275</td><td>0.002</td><td>up7.8</td><td>5.32/31916</td><td>16</td><td>3/13%</td><td>IM</td><td>unknown</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>*Only spots with a *q*-value (False Discovery Rate) <0.05 and a P (Power)>0.8 were conserved.</footnote>

<footnote>Spot refers to spots detected from 2-DE gel analysis (Fig. 2A and B), N-fold: protein abundance difference between 5% O₂ and 19% O₂, up: higher abundance protein, do: lower abundance protein, pI: protein isoelectric point; MW: protein molecular weight (Da); NMP: number of matching peptides, Pc: % of protein coverage, OM: outer membrane, IM: inner membrane; PP: periplasm, EC: extracellular, CytP: cytosol. The identification of the proteins indicated in italic was not statistically validated.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.t002</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Relative mRNA levels of *peb4*, *cadF*, *dnaJ*, *cjj0275* and *cjj0854* as revealed by qRT-PCR in oxygen-acclimated *C. jejuni* 81-176 normalized to relative mRNA levels observed in non-acclimated cells (equivalent to 1). The rpoA gene was used as the endogenous control. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean of three independent RNA extractions. Significant differences between oxygen-acclimated and non-acclimated cells were validated statistically (0.002<P<0.035). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.g003</figcaption></figure>

## Swarming capability of oxygen-acclimated cells

As flagellum components (FlaA and FlgE) were over-expressed in oxygen-acclimated conditions, the swarming capability of *C. jejuni* 81-176 was assessed in optimal growth conditions and in oxygen-acclimated conditions (Fig. 4). After 48 h incubation on soft agar, the results revealed that swarming capability was significantly enhanced in oxygen-acclimated conditions as compared to microaerobic conditions.

## Adhesion of oxidative-stressed cells and oxygen-acclimated cells to abiotic surfaces

The capability of oxygen-acclimated cells as well as paraquat-stressed cells to adhere to an inert surface was estimated using the Biofilm Ring Test® (Fig. 5). This test was designed to assess both bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation in 96-well microtiter plates. The test is based on the reduced detection of magnetic beads entrapped by the adherent bacterial cells. It has been applied to various bacteria able to adhere to inert surfaces (e.g. [45-47]) and found especially appropriate for assessing *Campylobacter* adhesion [48]. As *C. jejuni* 81-176 adhesion is close to the detection limit using the Biofilm Ring Test® after 2 h, any effect that would increase the number of adherent cells could not be correctly assessed. For this reason, the adhesion experiments were performed after 0.5 h when fewer adherent cells in the control under microaerobic conditions were detected [48]. Paraquat, a

superoxide anion generator, was used to induce an oxidative stress as previously described [15] on broth cultivated cells. Cells stimulated by paraquat or acclimated to enriched oxygen conditions displayed a greater adhesion capability than those cultivated in microaerobic conditions, indicating that oxidizing agents have an impact on the very first step of biofilm development. No significant difference was observed between oxygen-acclimated cells and paraquat-stressed cells.

## Identification of CadF protein forms using immunoblotting

The absence of CadF protein in the OMP enriched fraction of the derivative 81-176 Δ*cadF* mutant as compared to the isogenic strain was verified using dotblotting (Fig. 6A). The immunoblot using anti-CadF antibodies performed from the 2-DE gel of the sarcosyl-insoluble fraction of oxygen-acclimated cells confirmed the identification of different forms of CadF. These included the two higher-abundance forms (CadF-1 and CadF-2) and the lower-abundance form (CadF-3) in oxygen-acclimated conditions (Fig. 6B).

## Effect of cadF mutation on adhesion to an inert surface of paraquat-stressed cells and oxygen-acclimated cells

The *C. jejuni* 81-176 mutant Δ*cadF* was significantly less adherent than its isogenic strain (Fig. 6C). In addition, neither
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Motility of *C. jejuni* 81-176 on BHI+0.6% agar in microaerobic (5% O₂) and oxygen-enriched conditions (19% O₂) after 48 h at 42°C. Assays were performed with 2 µL of pure culture or 10 times diluted culture. (A) Mean diameters of three independent experiments. (B) Example of motility plates obtained after 48 h at 42°C with a diluted culture.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.g004</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Adhesion capability after 0.5 h to an inert surface of oxygen-acclimated cells and oxidative-stressed cells of *C. jejuni* 81-176. 19% O₂: oxygen-acclimated cells, (PQ) oxidative- stressed cells mediated by paraquat, (T) control without oxidizing agents (micro-aerobic conditions). Bacterial initial concentration was 8.81±0.05 Log(CFU/mL) for oxygen-acclimated cells, 8.20±0.11 Log(CFU/mL) for PQ-stressed cells and 8.85±0.05 Log(CFU/mL) for the control. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent assays. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.05) in comparison with the control.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.g005</figcaption></figure>

oxygen-acclimated cells nor paraquat-stressed cells from the mutant recovered their initial adhesion level, confirming that CadF is involved in the adhesion process of *C. jejuni* to inert surfaces.

## Discussion

The purpose of this study was to examine the response of microaerophilic *C. jejuni* 81-176 to oxygen-enriched conditions at the membrane protein level. Oxygen was selected instead of using chemicals generating ROS molecules, such as hydrogen peroxide and paraquat, which are frequently applied to induce oxidative stress in *C. jejuni*. This enabled efflux pump activation to be encompassed such as that reported in *Salmonella enterica* for paraquat efflux [49,50] and, more recently, in *C. jejuni* with CmeG [51] for oxygen peroxide (H₂O₂) efflux. In addition, a single method of growth was chosen to avoid any cellular changes due to the method [52]. To segregate the influence of oxygen from that of any other gas, controlled mixtures of gas essential for *C. jejuni* growth (O₂, CO₂) were used. As a capnophilic bacterial species, *C. jejuni* is able to assimilate CO₂, which could be explained by a reverse reaction producing pyruvate by a flavodoxin quinone reductase FqrB (Cjj_0584) as demonstrated in the closely related species *Helicobacter pylori* [53]. Thus, O₂ concentration could be varied while the CO₂ concentration was maintained at a constant level. However, oxygen is a less powerful oxidizing molecule and its solubility is very low in liquid at 42°C (Henry's constant = 9.28×10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ atm⁻¹ in water at 42°C). In our study, oxygen transfer was reduced by applying controlled gas mixtures to cells forming colonies. The mixture of 19% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 71% N₂ was used to obtain oxygen-acclimated cells while 5% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 85% N₂, which is the modified atmosphere usually applied for optimal growth conditions, was used as a control.
cates that this gene is induced in conditions favoring a net accumulation of ROS.

As some over-expressed proteins have previously been identified as signatures of biofilm formation in *C. jejuni*, adhesion to inert surfaces was compared for oxygen-acclimated cells and microaerobically grown cells. Interestingly, cells acclimated to oxygen-enriched conditions enhanced *C. jejuni* adhesion to inert surfaces. In addition, the comparable adhesion obtained with cells stressed with paraquat confirmed that ROS-generating conditions enhanced adhesion of *C. jejuni* to inert surfaces. Furthermore, examining the effect of oxidative conditions prior to adhesion in our study rather than during biofilm formation indicated that these conditions enhanced the first step of biofilm formation by modifying the cell biology to achieve a better adhesion capability. Subsequently, oxidative conditions confer a survival and dissemination advantage of *C. jejuni* through adhesion to abiotic surfaces in the food environment *sensu lato*.

Although the higher abundance of CadF in the outer membrane in oxygen-enriched conditions was modest, it was statistically validated and corroborated with its transcription in these conditions and, as previously shown, its over-expression among cytosoluble proteins in *C. jejuni* NCTC 11168 [15]. Consequently, using an insertional inactivation of the *cadF* gene in *C. jejuni* 81-176, a *cadF* mutant was tested for its capability to adhere to an abiotic surface. The lower adhesion capability of the *cadF* mutant compared to its isogenic strain indicates that CadF also plays a role in the inert surface adhesion process and may contribute to the enhanced adhesion in oxygen-enriched conditions. Furthermore, the adhesion of CadF mutant cells submitted to oxidative conditions mediated by both paraquat and oxygen was not different from that of CadF mutant cells cultivated in microaerobic conditions, confirming that CadF is a key protein in the adhesion mechanism of *C. jejuni* to inert surfaces. Taken together, these results suggest that adhesion to inert surfaces is also mediated by CadF whose expression is controlled by oxidative conditions. The alignment of CadF sequences indicates that this protein is well-conserved among *C. jejuni* strains suggesting its functional importance (cf. Fig. S2). Three forms of CadF (CadF-1, 24 kDa, CadF-2, 35 kDa, and CadF-3, 25 kDa), also detected by immunoblotting, were modulated under oxygen-enriched conditions. Cordwell *et al.* [36,73] have also previously observed a series of spots corresponding to CadF on 2-DE gels of the entire membrane of *C. jejuni* with variations in their immunogenic properties. The authors also reported two cleavage sites between serine¹⁹⁵ and leucine¹⁹⁶, and glycine²⁰¹ and phenylalanine²⁰² (nucleotide counts without the 16 nt-peptide signal). Among the three *pI* variants of CadF modulated by oxygen-enriched conditions in our study, CadF-2 displayed a higher molecular weight (35 kDa/*pI* 6.01) than that of CadF-1 and CadF-3 (24 kDa/*pI* 4.85 and 25 kDa/*pI* 5.07, respectively). Noticeably, the protein coverage of CadF-2 included the cleavage site while peptides for CadF-1 and CadF-3 matched only in the N-terminal region suggesting a cleavage of these proteins (cf. Fig. S3). This cleavage could be carried out by the carboxyl-terminal protease and the HtrA serine protease [36]. An increased abundance of HtrA has been associated with robust chicken colonization and may reflect a requirement for protease activity in colonization [60]. Interestingly, HtrA was also more abundant in oxygen-enriched conditions in our study.

In conclusion, these data demonstrate that oxygen-enriched conditions promote over-expression of the membrane proteins involved in the biofilm initiation and virulence of *C. jejuni*. The adhesion of *C. jejuni* to inert surfaces results in a complex process which exacerbates and employs proteic virulence factors. Finally,

even though aerobic conditions are detrimental to *C. jejuni* growth, sub-lethal oxidative conditions could favor its survival throughout food processing because it develops a greater ability to adhere to inert surfaces, which could explain the re- and cross-contamination of food products by this pathogen.

## Materials and Methods

### Bacterial strains, media and growth conditions

The clinical *Campylobacter jejuni* strains NCTC 11168, 81-176 and its *ΔcadF* derivative generated via insertion of the kan⁴ cassette were used in this study. A loopful of frozen culture conserved at -80°C in Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Biokar, Beauvais, France) containing 20% sterile glycerol was spread on fresh Karmali agar plates (Oxoid, Dardilly, France) and incubated in microaerobic conditions of 5% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 85% N₂ (Air Liquide, Paris, France) at 42°C for 48 h. Then, a subculture was performed in BHI in 24-well plates incubated for 18 h at 42°C under microaerobic conditions (5% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 85% N₂, Air Liquide) or oxygen-acclimated conditions (19% O₂, 10% CO₂, and 71% N₂, Air Liquide) with shaking. Next, calibrated inocula (100 µL of a 10⁵ diluted culture) obtained from the subculture were spread on Columbia blood-free gelose plates (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) or Columbia plates supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood and incubated at 42°C in stainless steel jars (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd, West Yorkshire, UK) under microaerobic conditions or oxygen-acclimated conditions from 15 to 68 h. Each jar was successively vacuum-emptied and refilled twice before incubation to ensure the correct gas concentration. For *C. jejuni* 81-176, cells were harvested from plates flooded with 5 mL of sterile peptone water and the colonies were removed from the agar plates with a cell scraper after 24 h in optimal growth conditions (microaerobic conditions) and after 42 h in the oxygen-acclimated conditions in order to obtain an equivalent number and size of countable colonies.

Cells oxidatively stressed with paraquat, a molecule generating free radicals [74], were obtained as previously described by Garénaux *et al.* [15] and used afterwards for adhesion assays. Briefly, cells grown in the above-mentioned microaerobic conditions were centrifuged for 20 min at 3000×g at 20°C and resuspended up to an optical density (OD) of 1.00±0.05 at 600 nm in sterile peptone water broth (PWB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 500 µM paraquat (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France) and then incubated for 1 h at 42°C under microaerobic conditions. A control of non-stressed cells was exposed to the same conditions without paraquat. After incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation for 20 min at 3000×g at 20°C and used for adhesion assays.

### Bacterial adhesion to an abiotic surface

Adhesion was assessed for each strain in microaerobic static conditions using the BioFilm Ring Test® (BioFilm Control, Saint-Beauzire, France) according to the protocol described in detail by Sulaeman *et al.* [48]. Briefly, cultures calibrated to OD₆₀₀ nm = 1±0.05 were added to 8-well polystyrene strips and incubated for 0.5 or 2 h under microaerobic conditions (5% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 85% N₂) or oxygen enriched conditions (19% O₂, 10% CO₂ and 71% N₂). The adhesion capability of each strain was expressed as the mean of the BioFilm Index (BFI) of three wells calculated by the software. Detection is based on attracted beads forming a black spot in the bottom of the wells detected by the Scan Plate Reader (BioFilm Control). The initial concentration before adhesion was verified by plating the appropriate decimal dilution on Blood Gelose plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK).
Colonies were enumerated after incubation in microaerobic conditions at 42°C for 48 h. The initial bacterial concentration was calculated from the mean of colonies enumerated on three plates of the appropriate dilution. Three independent assays (from independent cultures) for each condition were performed.

## Bacterial motility

The swarming motility of *C. jejuni* 81–176 was assessed according to Scott *et al.* (2007) [75] with the following modifications. Swarm 0.6% soft agar BHI plates were briefly dried, inoculated with 2 µL of pure culture or 10 times diluted cultures and incubated at 42°C in microaerobic conditions or oxygen-acclimated conditions for 48 h. After incubation, strain motility was calculated by measuring the diameter of the growth area. The experiments were carried out in triplicate from three independent cultures.

## Membrane protein extraction

After ultrasound treatment of bacterial cells, cytoplasmic proteins were separated from membrane fractions by ultracentrifugation at 188,000×g for 1 h at 4°C as described previously in Bièche *et al.* (2011). Then, inner membrane proteins (IMPs) and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) contained in the pellet were separated by a sodium lauryl sarcosinate (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) treatment [76] carried out on ice for 20 min with shaking. To determine the optimal separation conditions, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2% sodium lauryl sarcosinate concentrations were tested and only 0.5% was used subsequently. After ultracentrifugation at 188,000×g for 1 h at 4°C, supernatant containing IMPs and pellet containing OMPs resuspended in 1 mM EDTA were aliquoted and stored at -80°C. The protein concentration of OMPs and IMPs was determined using the Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Perbio Science, Brebieres, France) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

To check the optimal separation of IMPs and OMPs using sodium lauryl sarcosinate, migration through 12.5% acrylamide/bisacrylamide SDS-PAGE (18×20×0.75 mm) was performed with a 4% acrylamide/bisacrylamide stacking gel using a Protean II cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) SDS-PAGE. Samples of 10 µg of proteins were mixed in a ratio of 3:1 with the reducing agent sample buffer containing 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and a trace of bromophenol blue, and heated for 5 min at 100°C. Proteins in gels were silver stained and scanned with a GS-800 densitometer (Bio-Rad) operated with the QuantityOne® software (Bio-Rad) at a resolution of 42.3 microns.

## Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE)

A quantity of 100 µg of protein was concentrated using the Concentrator 5301 (Eppendorf, Le Pecq, France), at room temperature, until the solution volume was reduced to 40 µL. Then, each sample was solubilized in 400 µL of a solution containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2 mM tributyl phosphine (TBP), 1% amidosulfobetaine-14 (ASB-14), 2% carrier ampholytes and 0.25% Coomassie Blue R-250 (Sigma-Aldrich) under rotation shaking for 1 h. Next, each protein sample was frozen/thawed for at least 30 min at -80°C. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 8000×g for 3 min at 4°C. Iso-Electro Focusing (IEF) (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France) was carried out with 18-cm NonLinear Immobiline Dry IPG strips (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Gradients giving the best results in terms of spot quantity, quality and separation were used: a linear gradient pH 4–7 for OMPs and a non-linear gradient pH 3–10 for IMPs. Strips were rehydrated under 50 V for 10 h and the voltage for

protein focalization was as follows: 250 V for 15 min, a linear increase to 10,000 V for 3 h, then 10,000 V until 105 kVh was reached. After focalization, IPG strips were first reduced for 10 min in 2% dithiothreitol (DTT) and subsequently alkylated for 10 min in 2% iodoacetamide, contained in a detergent exchange buffer composed of 7 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 15% glycerol, 2% SDS and 1% Coomassie Blue R-250 as described previously by Vilain *et al.* [77].

The second-dimension electrophoresis was performed using 12.5% acrylamide/bisacrylamide SDS-PAGE. Strips were laid over the separation gel and embedded with 0.3% migration buffer supplemented with 5% polyacrylamide alignment gel. Migration was carried out at 4°C at 300 V maximum and 10 mA/gel for 45–60 min and then at 20 mA/gel. For protein identification, gels were loaded with 250 µg of proteins and stained in 0.06% Colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250 (Bio-Rad). All experiments were carried out in triplicate from three independent protein extractions.

## Image and statistical analyses of 2-DE gels

After scanning by the ProXPRESS Proteomic Imaging System (Perkin Elmer) with a resolution of 100 microns, the 2D gels were analyzed using Progenesis Samespots® 4.0 software (NonLinear Dynamics, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) for normalization of the gels and statistical analysis. In Progenesis SameSpots, normalization is performed from a calculated gain factor including variations from sample quantity to scanning setting and gel staining which avoid any variations due to major proteins. The quality of the gels was ensured using the Quality Control (QC) of Progenesis SameSpots software. Statistical analysis of protein expression was performed on at least six gels for each condition (5% O₂ and 19% O₂), i.e. 3 independent experiments (independent cultures) and at least 2 technical replicates for each independent culture. Differences between each condition were validated by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to determine if samples had the groupings expected or if there were any outliers in the data. In our study, only normalized spots exhibiting variations with a fold of at least 1.6 and with a *p*-value (ANOVA) ≤0.01, a *q*-value (False Discovery Rate, FDR) <0.05 and P (Power Analysis) >0.8 were selected as being differentially expressed. P depends on the sample size and can calculate the effect of running a different number of replicates. With a target power of 0.8, it is possible to select a fold of at least 1.6 without increasing the risk of including false positive spots.

## In-gel trypsin digestion and protein identification

Manually excised spots were washed several times with water and ammonium carbonate, dehydrated with acetonitrile (ACN) and dried. Trypsin digestion was performed overnight with a dedicated automated system (MultiPROBE II, PerkinElmer). The gel fragments were subsequently incubated twice in an H₂O/ACN solution for 15 min, then in 1% (v/v) Formic Acid for 15 min and finally in 100% ACN for 15 min to enable the extraction of peptides from the gel pieces. Supernatants were pooled and transferred into a clean 96-well plate. Peptide extracts were then dried and solubilized in 10 µL starting buffer for chromatographic elution, consisting of 3% ACN and 0.1% HCOOH in water.

Peptides were analyzed using a nano-LC1200 system coupled to a 6340 Ion Trap mass spectrometer equipped with an HPLC-chip cube interface (Agilent Technologies, Massy, France). The tandem mass spectrometry peak lists were extracted using the DataAnalysis program (version 3.4, Bruker Daltonic) and compared to the *C. jejuni*, strain 81–176, amino acid sequence database (UniprotKB, 09.09.2010) using the Mascot Daemon (version 2.1.3) search
<table><caption>**Table 3.** Primers used in this study for gene expression quantification using qRT-PCR.</caption><thead><tr><th>Primer name</th><th>Sequence 5'-3'</th><th>Amplicon length (bp) (ref)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>rpoAQ-fw</td><td>CGAGCTTGCTTTGATGAGTG</td><td>109 (Garénaux et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>rpoAQ-rev</td><td>AGTTCCCACAGGAAAACCTA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>cadF-fw</td><td>TGCTGATACTCGTGCAACTC</td><td>112 (Garénaux et al.)</td></tr><tr><td>cadF-rev</td><td>ACCAAAATGACCTTCCAAAG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>cjj0854-fw</td><td>GGTAGCGTTTTAAGCGTGGA</td><td>106</td></tr><tr><td>cjj0854-rev</td><td>TTTTTACAGCTTGGGTAATTTCTTTT</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>cjj0275-fw</td><td>TCATGCTGCTCGTGAAGAAG</td><td>106</td></tr><tr><td>cjj0275-rev</td><td>TGCAGCTTTTGCGTTAAATG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>dnaj1-fw</td><td>TATGTTCCCCGCCTTTAACA</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>dnaj1-rev</td><td>CCGCGGTTTTTAAATTCTTG</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>cjj0093-fw</td><td>TAGCCTTTGCCAAACCTGAT</td><td>116</td></tr><tr><td>cjj0093-rev</td><td>TATACCGCACATTCCACCAA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>peb4-fw</td><td>ACAGATGCTGCTTTCGCACT</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>peb4-rev</td><td>TTGACCTTTAGCCTGCGAAT</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

fw: forward, rev: reverse, bp: base pair.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046402.t003

engine. The searches were performed with a maximum of one missed cleavage, with no fixed modification and with variable modifications for carbamidomethyl and oxidation of methionines. Identification from the tandem mass spectrometry spectra was performed with a mass tolerance of 1.6 Da for precursor ions and 0.8 for MS/MS fragments. The determination of at least two peptide sequences with a Mascot Score over 50 using splitting patterns allowed a satisfactory identification of the protein. Cell localization was predicted using PSORTb v3.0.2 programs (http://www.psort.org/psortb/) [78].

## Dot and western blotting

Dot blotting was carried out by slowly spotting 5 µL of 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg of OMP-enriched fraction onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Western blotting was performed on proteins separated on the unstained 2-DE gel of the OMP-enriched fraction. Proteins were transferred (at 100 V for 2 h) to a nitrocellulose membrane using the Mini Trans-Blot Cell Assembly® SD Semi-dry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad).

Non specific sites were blocked by soaking each nitrocellulose membrane for 2 h in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl-pH 7.5 supplemented with 4% skim milk. Transferred proteins were probed with a 1/2000 dilution of rabbit anti-serum anti-CadF. Immunoreactive proteins were detected using a 1/2000 dilution goat-anti-rabbit alkaline phosphatase antibody, followed by incubation in 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) (Sigma-Aldrich). Gels were scanned using a GS-800 Imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad).

## RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Cell cultures supplemented with 1 mL RNA Protect Reagent (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) were pelleted (3300 g, 6 min) at 4°C and resuspended in 1 ml of EXTRACT-ALL® (Eurobio, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, the RNA samples were treated and submitted to reverse transcription according to Ritz *et al.* (2009) [79]. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were performed using the 7300 Realtime PCR system (Applied Biosystems) as

described previously by Bieche *et al.* [16] using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) as the amplification detector and the rpoA gene as the endogenous control. The absence of DNA in the samples was confirmed by classical PCR with primers CPYFLA_1 5'-GGATTTTCGTATTAACACAAATGGTGC-3' and CPYFLA_2 5' CTGTAGTAATCTTAAAACATTTTG-3' amplifying 1700 bp of the gene flaA. Gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR were designed according to the corresponding gene sequences of the identified proteins (Table 3). Three independent RNA extractions with four replicates for each gene were performed for each condition.

## Statistical analyses

The results from adhesion, motility and qRT-PCR, including assays and conditions, were analyzed using Statgraphics Plus 5.1 software (StatPoint Inc., Herndon, Virginia, USA). With the confirmation of a normal distribution for each data set, significant differences were determined using two-sided Student's t-test comparisons at a 5% significance level.

## Supporting Information

**Figure S1** Principal Component Analysis performed on the complete data set of the 14 2-DE gels for IMPs-enriched fraction (A) and 13 2-DE gels for OMPs-enriched fraction (B). Blue circles correspond to proteins of oxygen-acclimated cells and pink circles to proteins of microaerobically grown cells (control). (DOC)

**Figure S2** Alignment of CadF protein sequences from different strains of *C. jejuni* using software Clutax2. Frames highlight the suspected adhesion to fibronectin site (FRLS) and the two potential protease sites (SL) and (GF). (DOC)

**Figure S3** Protein coverage and matched peptides from the three protein forms of CadF (CadF-1, CadF-2 and CadF-3) which abundance was modulated under oxygen-
**acclimation conditions.** Matched peptides are indicated in red.

(DOC)

## Acknowledgments

We thank Florence JUGIAU and Florence RAMA for their technical help. We are grateful to Carol Robins for English editing. BioFilm Control (Saint-Beauzire, France) provided facilities for the BioFilm Ring Test®, the biomolecular platform (PFBM, Oniris, France) provided facilities for qRT-

PCR and the Institut Fédératif Multidisciplinaire (IFRMP 23, University of Rouen, France) provided facilities for proteomic analyses. Sheiam Sulaeman was the recipient of a Syrian fellowship.

## Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OT ED. Performed the experiments: SS MH AS LC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JMB. Wrote the paper: OT.

## References

1. Moore JE, Corcoran D, Dooley JSG, Fanning S, Lucey B, et al. (2005) *Campylobacter*. Veterinary Research 36: 351–382.

2. Acheson DW (1999) Foodborne infections. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 15: 538–545.

3. Nachamkin I (2002) Chronic effects of *Campylobacter* infection. Microbes and Infection 4: 399–403.

4. Boyanova L, Gergova G, Spassova Z, Koumanova R, Yaneva P, et al. (2004) *Campylobacter* infection in 682 Bulgarian patients with acute enterocolitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and other chronic intestinal diseases. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 49: 71–74.

5. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Widdowson MA, Hall AJ, Griffin PM (2011) Foodborne illness acquired in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17: 1339–1340.

6. Batz BM, Hoffmann S, Glenn Morris J (2011) Ranking the risks: The 10 pathogen-food combinations with the greatest burden on public health. Emerging Pathogens Institute- University of Florida 1–70 p.

7. Anon. (2010) Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of *Campylobacter* in broiler batches and of *Campylobacter* and *Salmonella* on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008. The EFSA Journal 8: 1503.

8. Liu X, Gao B, Novik V, Galán J (2012) Quantitative Proteomics of Intracellular *Campylobacter jejuni* Reveals Metabolic Reprogramming. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002562.

9. Chan KF, Le Tran H, Kanenaka RY, Kathariou S (2001) Survival of clinical and poultry-derived isolates of *Campylobacter jejuni* at a low temperature (4 degrees C). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67: 4186–4191.

10. Skirrow MB (1990) *Campylobacter*. Lancet 336: 921–923.

11. Fisher MT, Stadtman ER (1992) Oxidative modification of *Escherichia coli* glutamate-synthetase- Decrease in the thermodynamic stability of protein structure and specific changes in the active-site conformation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267: 1872–1880.

12. Yamasaki M, Igimi S, Katayama Y, Yamamoto S, Amano F (2004) Identification of an oxidative stress-sensitive protein from *Campylobacter jejuni*, homologous to rubredoxin oxidoreductase/rubrerythrin. FEMS Microbiology Letters 235: 57–63.

13. Broman T, Palmgren H, Bergstrom S, Sellin M, Waldenstrom J, et al. (2002) *Campylobacter jejuni* in black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus): prevalence, genotypes, and influence on *C. jejuni* epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40: 4594–4602.

14. Kaakoush NO, Miller WG, De Reuse H, Mendz GL (2007) Oxygen requirement and tolerance of *Campylobacter jejuni*. Research in Microbiology 158: 644–650.

15. Garénaux A, Guillou S, Ermel G, Wren B, Federighi M, et al. (2008) Role of the Cj1371 periplasmic protein and the Cj0355c two-component regulator in the *Campylobacter jejuni* NCTC 11168 response to oxidative stress caused by paraquat. Research in Microbiology 159: 718–726.

16. Bieche C, de Lamballerie M, Chevret D, Federighi M, Tresse O (2012) Dynamic proteome changes in *Campylobacter jejuni* 81–176 after high pressure shock and subsequent recovery. Journal of Proteomics 75: 1144–1156.

17. Garenaux A, Ritz M, Jugiau F, Rama F, Federighi M, et al. (2009) Role of oxidative stress in C. jejuni inactivation during freeze-thaw treatment. Curr Microbiol 58: 134–138.

18. Sellars MJ, Hall SJ, Kelly DJ (2002) Growth of *Campylobacter jejuni* supported by respiration of fumarate, nitrate, nitrite, trimethylamine-N-oxide, or dimethyl sulfoxide requires oxygen. Journal of Bacteriology 184: 4187–4196.

19. Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, et al. (2000) The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen *Campylobacter jejuni* reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403: 665–668.

20. Fouts DE, Mongodin EF, Mandrell RE, Miller WG, Rasko DA, et al. (2005) Major Structural Differences and Novel Potential Virulence Mechanisms from the Genomes of Multiple *Campylobacter* Species. PLoS Biology 3: e15.

21. Elvers KT, Park SF (2002) Quorum sensing in *Campylobacter jejuni*: detection of a luxS encoded signalling molecule. Microbiology 148: 1475–1481.

22. Baillon ML, van Vliet AH, Ketley JM, Constantinidou C, Penn CW (1999) An iron-regulated alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) confers aerotolerance and oxidative stress resistance to the microaerophilic pathogen *Campylobacter jejuni*. Journal of Bacteriology 181: 4798–4804.

23. Grant KA, Park SF (1995) Molecular characterization of KATA from *Campylobacter jejuni* and generation of a catalase-deficient mutant of *Campylobacter coli* by interspecific allelic exchange. Microbiology-Uk 141: 1369–1376.

24. Atack JM, Kelly DJ (2009) Oxidative stress in *Campylobacter jejuni*: responses, resistance and regulation. Future Microbiology 4: 677–690.

25. Corcionoschi N (2007) Using electron microscopy to detect bacterial morphological changes of *Campylobacter jejuni* 11168 as result of a cytochrome P450 gene knockout. Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol 52: 51–57.

26. van Vliet AH, Baillon MA, Penn CW, Ketley JM (2001) The iron-induced ferredoxin FdxA of *Campylobacter jejuni* is involved in aerotolerance. FEMS Microbiology Letters 196: 189–193.

27. Gundogdu O, Mills DC, Elmi A, Martin MJ, Wren BW, et al. (2011) The *Campylobacter jejuni* transcriptional regulator Cj1556 plays a role in the oxidative and aerobic (O2) stress response and is important for bacterial survival in vivo. Journal of Bacteriology.

28. Hwang S, Kim M, Ryu S, Jeon B (2011) Regulation of oxidative stress response by CosR, an essential response regulator in *Campylobacter jejuni*. PLoS One 6: e22300.

29. van Vliet AH, Ketley JM, Park SF, Penn CW (2002) The role of iron in *Campylobacter* gene regulation, metabolism and oxidative stress defense. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26: 173–186.

30. Atack JM, Harvey P, Jones MA, Kelly DJ (2008) The *Campylobacter jejuni* thiol peroxidases tpx and bcp both contribute to aerotolerance and peroxide-mediated stress resistance but have distinct substrate specificities. Journal of Bacteriology 190: 5279–5290.

31. Hofreuter D, Tsai J, Watson RO, Novik V, Altman B, et al. (2006) Unique features of a highly pathogenic *Campylobacter jejuni* strain. Infection and Immunity 74: 4694–4707.

32. Santoni V, Kieffer S, Desclaux D, Masson F, Rabilloud T (2000) Membrane proteomics: use of additive main effects with multiplicative interaction model to classify plasma membrane proteins according to their solubility and electrophoretic properties. Electrophoresis 21: 3329–3344.

33. Asakura H, Yamasaki M, Yamamoto S, Igimi S (2007) Deletion of peb4 gene impairs cell adhesion and biofilm formation in *Campylobacter jejuni*. FEMS Microbiology Letters 275: 278–285.

34. Leon-Kempis Mdel R, Guccione E, Mulholland F, Williamson MP, Kelly DJ (2006) The *Campylobacter jejuni* PEB1a adhesin is an aspartate/glutamate-binding protein of an ABC transporter essential for microaerobic growth on dicarboxylic amino acids. Molecular Microbiology 60: 1262–1275.

35. Hobb RI, Fields JA, Burns CM, Thompson SA (2009) Evaluation of procedures for outer membrane isolation from *Campylobacter jejuni*. Microbiology 155: 979–988.

36. Cordwell SJ, Len AC, Touma RG, Scott NE, Falconer L, et al. (2008) Identification of membrane-associated proteins from *Campylobacter jejuni* strains using complementary proteomics technologies. Proteomics 8: 122–139.

37. Brown RN, Romine MF, Schepmoes AA, Smith RD, Lipton MS (2010) Mapping the subcellular proteome of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using sarkosyl-based fractionation and LC-MS/MS protein identification. Journal of Proteome Research 9: 4454–4463.

38. Solis N, Cordwell SJ (2011) Current methodologies for proteomics of bacterial surface-exposed and cell envelope proteins. Proteomics 11: 3169–3189.

39. Siroy A, Cosette P, Seyer D, Lemaitre-Guillier C, Vallenot D, et al. (2006) Global comparison of the membrane subproteomes between a multidrug-resistant *Acinetobacter baumannii* strain and a reference strain. Journal of Proteome Research 5: 3385–3398.

40. Berrier C, Garrigues A, Richarme G, Ghazi A (2000) Elongation factor Tu and DnaK are transferred from the cytoplasm to the periplasm of *Escherichia coli* during osmotic downshock presumably via the mechanosensitive channel mscL. Journal of Bacteriology 182: 248–251.

41. Pancholi V, Chhatwal GS (2003) Housekeeping enzymes as virulence factors for pathogens. International Journal of Medical Microbiology 293: 391–401.

42. Prokhorova TA, Nielsen PN, Petersen J, Kofoed T, Crawford JS, et al. (2006) Novel surface polypeptides of *Campylobacter jejuni* as traveller's diarrhoea vaccine candidates discovered by proteomics. Vaccine 24: 6446–6455.

43. Kolberg J, Hammerschmidt S, Frank R, Jonak J, Sanderova H, et al. (2008) The surface-associated elongation factor Tu is concealed for antibody binding on viable *pneumococci* and *meningococci*. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 53: 222–230.
44. Jianke L, Mao F, Begna D, Yu F, Aijuan Z (2010) Proteome comparison of hypopharyngeal gland development between Italian and royal jelly producing worker honeybees (*Apis mellifera* L.). *Journal of Proteome Research* 9: 6578-6594.

45. Chavant P, Gaillard-Martinie B, Talon R, Hebraud M, Bernardi T (2007) A new device for rapid evaluation of biofilm formation potential by bacteria. *J Microbiol Methods* 68: 605-612.

46. Mace C, Seyer D, Chemani C, Cosette P, Di-Martino P, et al. (2008) Identification of biofilm-associated cluster (bac) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in biofilm formation and virulence. *PLoS One* 3: e3897.

47. Cremet L, Corvec S, Bemer P, Bret L, Lebrun C, et al. (2012) Orthopaedic-implant infections by Escherichia coli: molecular and phenotypic analysis of the causative strains. *Journal of Infection* 64: 169-175.

48. Sulaeman S, Le Bihan G, Rossero A, Federighi M, De E, et al. (2009) Comparison between the biofilm initiation of *Campylobacter jejuni* and *Campylobacter coli* strains to an inert surface using BioFilm Ring Test. *Journal of Applied Microbiology* 108: 1303-1312.

49. Gil F, Ipinza F, Fuentes J, Fumeron R, Villarreal JM, et al. (2007) The ompW (porin) gene mediates methyl viologen (paraquat) efflux in *Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium*. *Research in Microbiology* 158: 529-536.

50. Nikaido E, Shirotsuka I, Yamaguchi A, Nishino K (2011) Regulation of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump in *Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium* in response to indole and paraquat. *Microbiology* 157: 648-655.

51. Jeon B, Wang Y, Hao H, Barton YW, Zhang Q (2011) Contribution of CmeG to antibiotic and oxidative stress resistance in *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy* 66: 79-85.

52. John A, Connerton PL, Cummings N, Connerton IF (2011) Profound differences in the transcriptome of Campylobacter jejuni grown in two different, widely used, microaerobic atmospheres. *Research in Microbiology* 162: 410-418.

53. St Maurice M, Cremades N, Crozen MA, Sisson G, Sancho J, et al. (2007) Flavodoxin:quinone reductase (FqrB): a redox partner of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase that reversibly couples pyruvate oxidation to NADPH production in *Helicobacter pylori* and *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Journal of Bacteriology* 189: 4764-4773.

54. Yao R, Burr DH, Doig P, Trust TJ, Niu H, et al. (1994) Isolation of motile and non-motile insertional mutants of *Campylobacter jejuni*: the role of motility in adherence and invasion of eukaryotic cells. *Mol Microbiol* 14: 883-893.

55. Yao R, Burr DH, Guerry P (1997) CheY-mediated modulation of *Campylobacter jejuni* virulence. *Mol Microbiol* 23: 1021-1031.

56. Wassenaar TM, Bleumink-Pluym NM, van der Zeijst BA (1991) Inactivation of *Campylobacter jejuni* flagellin genes by homologous recombination demonstrates that flaA but not flaB is required for invasion. *EMBO Journal* 10: 2055-2061.

57. Konkel ME, Klena JD, Rivera-Amill V, Monteville MR, Biswas D, et al. (2004) Secretion of virulence proteins from *Campylobacter jejuni* is dependent on a functional flagellar export apparatus. *Journal of Bacteriology* 186: 3296-3303.

58. Guerry P (2007) *Campylobacter* flagella: not just for motility. *Trends in Microbiology* 15: 456-461.

59. Grant CC, Konkel ME, Cieplak W Jr, Tompkins LS (1993) Role of flagella in adherence, internalization, and translocation of *Campylobacter jejuni* in nonpolarized and polarized epithelial cell cultures. *Infection and Immunity* 61: 1764-1771.

60. Seal BS, Hiett KL, Kuntz RL, Woolsey R, Schegg KM, et al. (2007) Proteomic Analyses of a Robust versus a Poor Chicken Gastrointestinal Colonizing Isolate of *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Journal of Proteome Research* 6: 4582-4591.

61. Joshua GW, Guthrie-Irons C, Karlyshev AV, Wren BW (2006) Biofilm formation in *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Microbiology* 152: 387-396.

62. Reuter M, Mallett A, Pearson BM, van Vliet AHM (2010) Biofilm formation by *Campylobacter jejuni* is increased under aerobic conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76: 2122-2128.

63. Barken KB, Pamp SJ, Yang L, Gjermansen M, Bertrand JJ, et al. (2008) Roles of type IV pili, flagellum-mediated motility and extracellular DNA in the formation of mature multicellular structures in *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* biofilms. Environmental Microbiology 10: 2331-2343.

64. Kim TJ, Young BM, Young GM (2008) Effect of flagellar mutations on *Yersinia enterocolitica* biofilm formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74: 5466-5474.

65. Kirov SM, Castrisos M, Shaw JG (2004) *Aeromonas* flagella (polar and lateral) are enterocyte adhesins that contribute to biofilm formation on surfaces. *Infection and Immunity* 72: 1939-1945.

66. O'Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* biofilm development. *Molecular Microbiology* 30: 295-304.

67. Watnick PI, Lauriano CM, Klose KE, Croal L, Kolter R (2001) The absence of a flagellum leads to altered colony morphology, biofilm development and virulence in *Vibrio cholerae* O139. *Molecular Microbiology* 39: 223-235.

68. Burucoa C, Frémaux C, Pei Z, Tummuru M, Blaser MJ, et al. (1995) Nucleotide sequence and characterization of peb4A encoding an antigenic protein in *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Research in Microbiology* 146: 467-476.

69. Rathbun KM, Hall JE, Thompson SA (2009) Cj0596 is a periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase involved in *Campylobacter jejuni* motility, invasion, and colonization. *BMC Microbiology* 9: 1-16.

70. Konkel ME, Garvis SG, Tipton SL, Anderson JDE, Cieplak JW (1997) Identification and molecular cloning of a gene encoding a fibronectin-binding protein (CadF) from *Campylobacter jejuni*. *Molecular Microbiology* 24: 953-963.

71. Monteville MR, Yoon JE, Konkel ME (2003) Maximal adherence and invasion of INT 407 cells by *Campylobacter jejuni* requires the CadF outer-membrane protein and microfilament reorganization. *Microbiology* 149: 153-165.

72. Larson CL, Shah DH, Dhillon AS, Call DR, Ahn S, et al. (2008) *Campylobacter jejuni* invade chicken LMH cells inefficiently and stimulate differential expression of the chicken CXCL1i1 and CXCLi2 cytokines. *Microbiology* 154: 3835-3847.

73. Scott NE, Marzook NB, Deutscher A, Falconer L, Crossett B, et al. (2010) Mass spectrometric characterization of the *Campylobacter jejuni* adherence factor CadF reveals post-translational processing that removes immunogenicity while retaining fibronectin binding. *Proteomics* 10: 277-288.

74. Hassan HM, Fridovich I (1979) Paraquat and *Escherichia coli*. Mechanism of production of extracellular superoxide radical. *Journal of Biological Chemistry* 254: 10846-10852.

75. Scott AE, Timms AR, Connerton PL, Loc Carrillo C, Adzfa Radzum K, et al. (2007) Genome dynamics of *Campylobacter jejuni* in response to bacteriophage predation. *PLoS Pathog* 3: e119.

76. Filip C, Fletcher G, Wulff JL, Earhart CF (1973) Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of *Escherichia coli* by the ionic detergent sodium-lauryl sarcosinate. *Journal of Bacteriology* 115: 717-722.

77. Vilain S, Cosette P, Charlionet R, Hubert M, Lange C, et al. (2001) Substituting Coomassie Brilliant Blue for bromophenol blue in two-dimensional electrophoresis buffers improves the resolution of focusing patterns. *Electrophoresis* 22: 4368-4374.

78. Yu N, Wagner J, Laird M, Melli G, Rey S, et al. (2010) PSORTb 3.0: Improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. *Bioinformatics* 26: 1608-1615.

79. Ritz M, Garenaux A, Berge M, Federighi M (2009) Determination of rpoA as the most suitable internal control to study stress response in *C. jejuni* by RT-qPCR and application to oxidative stress. *J Microbiol Methods* 76: 196-200.