# Genome sequence of the exopolysaccharide-producing Salipiger mucosus type strain (DSM 16094 T), a moderately halophilic member of the Roseobacter clade

Thomas Riedel, Stefan Spring, Anne Fiebig, Jörn Petersen, Nikos C Kyrpides, Markus Göker, Hans-Peter Klenk

► To cite this version:

Thomas Riedel, Stefan Spring, Anne Fiebig, Jörn Petersen, Nikos C Kyrpides, et al.. Genome sequence of the exopolysaccharide-producing Salipiger mucosus type strain (DSM 16094 T), a moderately halophilic member of the Roseobacter clade. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 2014, 9 (3), pp.1333-1345. 10.4056/sigs.4909790. hal-01230507

HAL Id: hal-01230507

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01230507

Submitted on 18 Nov 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Genome sequence of the exopolysaccharide-producing *Salipiger mucosus* type strain (DSM 16094<sup>T</sup>), a moderately halophilic member of the *Roseobacter* clade

Thomas Riedel<sup>1,2</sup>, Stefan Spring<sup>3</sup>, Anne Fiebig<sup>3</sup>, Jörn Petersen<sup>3</sup>, Nikos C. Kyrpides<sup>4</sup>, Markus Göker<sup>3*,</sup> Hans-Peter Klenk<sup>3</sup>

Keywords: aerobic, chemoheterotrophic, rod-shaped, photosynthesis, extrachromosomal elements, OmniLog phenotyping, *Roseobacter* clade, *Rhodobacteraceae*, *Alphaproteobacteria*.

*Salipiger mucosus* Martínez-Cànovas et al. 2004 is the type species of the genus *Salipiger*, a moderately halophilic and exopolysaccharide-producing representative of the *Roseobacter* lineage within the alphaproteobacterial family *Rhodobacteraceae*. Members of this family were shown to be the most abundant bacteria especially in coastal and polar waters, but were also found in microbial mats and sediments. Here we describe the features of the *S. mucosus* strain DSM 16094T together with its genome sequence and annotation. The 5,689,389-bp genome sequence consists of one chromosome and several extrachromosomal elements. It contains 5,650 protein-coding genes and 95 RNA genes. The genome of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T was sequenced as part of the activities of the Transregional Collaborative Research Center 51 (TRR51) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

## Introduction

The *Roseobacter* clade is a very heterogeneous group of marine *Alphaproteobacteria* that plays an important role in the global carbon cycle and other biogeochemical processes [1]. Members of this group form an allegedly monophyletic, physiologically heterogeneous, as well as metabolically versatile group of bacterioplankton [1]. They are known to live in the open ocean, especially in coastal areas, where they have been found many times in symbiosis with algae, in microbial mats, sediments, or associated with invertebrates, but representatives of this lineage were also isolated from marine environments like polar waters or sea ice [1-4], which is also presented and reflected by their genome sequences [2]. Whereas some members of the *Roseobacter* clade contain the pigment bacteriochlorophyll *a* and are capable of aerobic anoxygenic photophosphorylation, other members were found to transform dimethylsulfonylpropionate into dimethylsulfide [4-6].

Some representatives of the *Roseobacter* lineage such as *Salipiger mucosus* A3T are also known to

be moderate halophiles, which are adapted to a wide range of salinities and were found to produce special compounds like compatible solutes, halophilic enzymes or exopolysaccharides [7-9].

Strain A3T (=DSM 16094T =LMG 22090T =CECT 5855T) represents the type strain of *S. mucosus* (initially proposed as 'S. muscescens') in the monotypic genus *Salipiger* [10] and was isolated from saline soil bordering a saltern on the Mediterranean Sea coast at Calblanque (Spain) [7]. The genus name *Salipiger* was derived from the Latin noun *sal*, *salis* ('salt') and the Latin adjective *piger* ('lavy') [10]. The species epithet *mucosus* refers to the Latin adjective *mucosus* ('slimy, mucous') [10]. Current PubMed records do not indicate any follow-up research with strain A3T after the initial description of *S. mucosus* [7] and the characterization of its exopolysaccharide [11].

In this study we analyzed the genome sequence of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T, which was selected for sequencing under the auspices of the German Research Foundation (DFG) Transregio-SFB51 *Roseobacter* grant because of its phylogenetic position [12] and was also a candidate for the Ge-

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1"><sup>1</sup>Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, USR 3579, LBBM, Observatoire Océanologique, Banyuls/Mer, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2"><sup>2</sup> CNRS, USR 3579, LBBM, Observatoire Océanologique, Banyuls/Mer, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3"><sup>3</sup> Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany* Correspondence: Markus Göker (mgo08@dsmz.de)</footnote>
nomic Encyclopedia of *Archaea* and *Bacteria* [13]. We present a description of the genomic sequencing and annotation and present a summary classification together with a set of features for strain DSM 16094T, including novel aspects of its phenotype.

## Classification and features

### 16S rRNA gene analysis

The single genomic 16S rRNA gene sequence of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T was compared with the Greengenes database for determining the weighted relative frequencies of taxa and (truncated) keywords as previously described [14]. The most frequently occurring genera were *Salipiger* (21.2%), *Pelagibaca* (17.1%), *Roseovarius* (17.0%), *Marinovum* (13.1%) and *Roseobacter* (9.5%) (30 hits in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within high scoring pairs (HSPs) was 100.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 97.2%. Regarding the two hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 98.4%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.0%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was 'Salipiger bermudensis' (DQ178660), which corresponded to an identity of 96.8% and a HSP coverage of 99.9%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (=EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification). The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AB302369 (Greengenes short name 'Hydrocarbon-Degrading Indonesian Seawater seawater isolate B44-2B44-2 str. B44-2'), which showed an identity of 97.4% and an HSP coverage of 95.4%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples that yielded hits were 'aquat, rank' (4.9%), 'microbi' (3.7%), 'harbour, newport' (3.3%), 'water' (2.7%) and 'seawat' (2.4%) (219 hits in total) and in line with the habitat from which strain A3T was isolated. Environmental samples that yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of *S. mucosus* strain DSM 16094T in a 16S rRNA gene sequence based tree. The sequence of the single 16S rRNA gene copy in the genome does not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence (AY527274), which contains two ambiguous base calls.

### Morphology and physiology

Cells of strain A3T are pleomorphic and stain Gram-negative (Figure 2). They are 1 µm in width and 2.0-2.5 µm in length. Motility was not observed. They live a strictly aerobic and chemoheterotrophic lifestyle. Colonies grown on MY solid medium are circular, convex, cream-colored and mucoid, whereas in liquid medium their growth is uniform. Cells are encapsulated. They are moderately halophilic, and capable of growth in a mixture of sea salts from 0.5 to 20% (w/v), whereas the optimum is between 3 and 6% (w/v) sea salts. When using NaCl instead of sea salts, optimal growth occurs at a salt concentration of 9-10% (w/v). Cells of strain A3T grow within a temperature range of 20-40°C and at a pH range between 6 and 10. Growth does not occur under anaerobic conditions either by fermentation, fumarate or nitrate reduction or photoheterotrophy. Cells are cytochrome oxidase and catalase positive. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) are stored as reserve material within the cells. H2S is produced from L-cysteine. Selenite reduction, gluconate oxidation and phosphatase were observed. Urea and Tween 20 are hydrolyzed. A variety of tested organic compounds were neither metabolized nor sustained growth; for details see [7].

The utilization of carbon compounds by *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T grown at 28°C was also determined for this study using Generation-III microplates in an OmniLog phenotyping device (BIOLOG Inc., Hayward, CA, USA). The microplates were inoculated with a cell suspension at a cell density of 95-96% turbidity and dye IF-A. Further additives were vitamins, micronutrient and sea-salt solutions, which had to be added for dealing with such marine bacteria [29]. The plates were sealed with parafilm to avoid a loss of fluid. The exported measurement data were further analyzed with the opm package for R [30,31], using its functionality for statistically estimating parameters from the respiration curves such as the maximum height, and automatically translating these values into negative, ambiguous, and positive reactions. The reactions were recorded in three individual biological replicates.
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of *S. mucosus* relative to the type strains of the type species of the other genera within the family *Rhodobacteraceae*. The tree was inferred from 1,331 aligned characters of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion as previously described [14]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [15] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 650 ML bootstrap replicates (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates (right) if larger than 60% [14]. (That is, the backbone of the tree is largely unresolved.) Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [16] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [3,17].</figcaption></figure>

The strain was positive for pH 6, 1% NaCl, 4% NaCl, 8% NaCl, D-galactose, 3-O-methyl-D-glucose, D-fucose, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, 1% sodium lactate, *myo*-inositol, rifamycin SV, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, L-histidine, L-serine, D-glucuronic acid, quinic acid, L-lactic acid, citric acid, *α*-keto-glutaric acid, D-malic acid, L-malic acid, nalidixic acid, sodium formate and the positive control.

No reactions could be detected for the negative control, dextrin, D-maltose, D-trehalose, D-cellobiose, *β*-gentiobiose, sucrose, D-turanose, stachyose, pH 5, D-raffinose, *α*-D-lactose, D-melibiose, *β*-methyl-D-galactoside, D-salicin, *N*-acetyl-D-glucosamine, *N*-acetyl-*β*-D-mannosamine, *N*-acetyl-D-galactosamine, *N*-acetyl-neuraminic acid, D-glucose, D-mannose, D-fructose, inosine, fusidic acid, D-serine, D-sorbitol, D-mannitol, D-arabitol, glycerol, D-glucose-6-phosphate, D-fructose-6-phosphate, D-aspartic acid

id, D-serine, troleandomycin, minocycline, gelatin, glycyl-L-proline, L-alanine, L-arginine, L-pyroglutamic acid, lincomycin, guanidine hydrochloride, niaproof, pectin, D-galacturonic acid, L-galactonic acid-*γ*-lactone, D-gluconic acid, glucuronamide, mucic acid, D-saccharic acid, vancomycin, tetrazolium violet, tetrazolium blue, p-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid, methyl pyruvate, D-lactic acid methyl ester, bromo-succinic acid, lithium chloride, potassium tellurite, tween 40, *γ*-amino-*n*-butyric acid, *γ*-hydroxy-butyric acid, *β*-hydroxy-butyric acid, *α*-keto-butyric acid, acetoacetic acid, propionic acid, acetic acid, aztreonam, butyric acid and sodium bromate.

Martínez-Cánovas *et al*. tested the strain A3T for growth on a variety of substrates, none of which were utilized under the applied conditions [7]. In contrast to this result, OmniLog measurements detected respiration in nearly twenty wells, in-
cluding several sugars and amino acids. This may
be due to respiratory measurements being more
sensitive than growth measurements [32]. For in-
stance, the positive reactions detected only in the
OmniLog instrument might be caused by sub-
strates that were only partially metabolized.

An important physiological property, the
halophilic lifestyle, could be confirmed by the
OmniLog measurements, showing that *S. mucosus*
is able to grow in up to 8% NaCl. According to [7]
the salt tolerance of this strain exceeds 10% NaCl.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Phase-contrast micrograph of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094<sup>T</sup>.</figcaption></figure>

Chemotaxonomy

The principal cellular fatty acids of strain A3T are
C18:1 ω7c (78.0%), C16:0 (12.4%), C12:1 3-OH (2.3%),
C19:0 cyclo ω8c (2.3%), C18:0 (2.0%) and C16:1 ω7c and/or
C15:0 iso 2-OH (1.3%). The presence of C18:1 ω7c as pre-
dominant fatty acid is a feature characteristic of
several taxa within the *Alphaproteobacteria* (e.g.
*Jannaschia helgolandensis* DSM 14858T [33],

*Octadecabacter arcticus* CIP 106731T [34],
*Ruegeria algicola* ATCC 51440T [35], *Sulfitobacter
mediterraneus* DSM 12244T [36] and *Staleya
guttiformis* DSM 14443T [37]).

The only detected respiratory lipoquinone was
ubiquinone 10, which is a well-known characteris-
tic of alphaproteobacterial representatives (all da-
ta from [7]).
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Classification and general features of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T according to the MIGS recommendations [18] (published by the Genome Standards Consortium [19]).</caption><thead><tr><th>MIGS ID</th><th>Property</th><th>Term</th><th>Evidence code</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Domain Bacteria</td><td>TAS [20]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Phylum Proteobacteria</td><td>TAS [21]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Class Alphaproteobacteria</td><td>TAS [22,23]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Current classification</td><td>Order Rhodobacterales</td><td>TAS [23,24]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Family Rhodobacteraceae</td><td>TAS [25]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Genus Salipiger</td><td>TAS [7]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Species Salipiger mucosus</td><td>TAS [7,26]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Strain A3<sup>T</sup></td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Gram stain</td><td>negative</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Cell shape</td><td>rod-shaped</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Motility</td><td>non-motile</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Sporulation</td><td>not reported</td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Temperature range</td><td>20-40°C</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Optimum temperature</td><td>30°C</td><td>NAS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Salinity</td><td>0.5-20% (Sea Salts)</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-22</td><td>Oxygen requirement</td><td>strictly aerobic</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Carbon source</td><td>complex (e.g., yeast extract, peptone)</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Energy metabolism</td><td>chemoheterotroph</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-6</td><td>Habitat</td><td>hypersaline soil</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-15</td><td>Biotic relationship</td><td>free living</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-14</td><td>Pathogenicity</td><td>none</td><td>NAS</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Biosafety level</td><td>1</td><td>TAS [27]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-23.1</td><td>Isolation</td><td>hypersaline soil bordering a saltern</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-4</td><td>Geographic location</td><td>Calblanque, Murcia (southeastern Spain)</td><td>TAS [1]</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-5</td><td>Sample collection time</td><td>1998</td><td>NAS</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-4.1</td><td>Latitude</td><td>37.64</td><td>NAS</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-4.2</td><td>Longitude</td><td>-0.77</td><td>NAS</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-4.3</td><td>Depth</td><td>not reported</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-4.4</td><td>Altitude</td><td>not reported</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [28].

## Genome sequencing and annotation

### Genome project history

The genome of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T was sequenced as a part of the DFG funded project TRR51 "Ecology, Physiology and Molecular Biology of the Roseobacter clade: Towards a Systems Biology Understanding of a Globally Important Clade of Marine Bacteria". The strain was chosen

for genome sequencing according the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (GEBA) criteria [12,13]. Project information can be found in the Genomes OnLine Database [16]. The genome sequence is deposited in GenBank and the Integrated Microbial Genomes database (IMG) [38]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Genome sequencing project information</caption><thead><tr><th>MIGS ID</th><th>Property</th><th>Term</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>MIGS-31</td><td>Finishing quality</td><td>Non-contiguous finished</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-28</td><td>Libraries used</td><td>Two genomic libraries: one Illumina PE library (420 bp insert size), one 454 PE library (3kb insert size)</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-29</td><td>Sequencing platforms</td><td>Illumina GA IIx, Illumina MiSeq, 454 GS-FLX+ Titanium</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-31.2</td><td>Sequencing coverage</td><td>430x</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-30</td><td>Assemblers</td><td>velvet version 1.1.36, Newbler version 2.3, consed 20.0</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-32</td><td>Gene calling method</td><td>Prodigal 1.4</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>INSDC ID</td><td>APVH00000000</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>GenBank Date of Release</td><td>July 31, 2013</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>GOLD ID</td><td>Gi0042373</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>NCBI project ID</td><td>188761</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Database: IMG</td><td>2523231081</td></tr><tr><td>MIGS-13</td><td>Source material identifier</td><td>DSM 16094</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Project relevance</td><td>Tree of Life, biodiversity</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A culture of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T was grown aerobically in DSMZ medium 512 [39] by adding 2.5% NaCl at a temperature of 30°C. Genomic DNA was isolated using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol provided by the manufacturer but modified by an incubation time of 60 min, the incubation on ice overnight on a shaker, the use of additional 50 µl proteinase K, and the addition of 100 µl protein precipitation buffer. The DNA is available from the Leibniz-Institute DSMZ through the DNA Bank Network [40].

## Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of two genomic libraries (Table 2). Sequencing and assembly were performed according to the protocol established for the genome of *R. thermophilum* DSM 16684T [17] with the following additional step. To achieve longer reads, the Illumina library was sequenced in one direction for 300 cycles, providing another 15.0 million reads. The hybrid assembly consisted of 14,800,324 filtered Illumina reads with a median length of 201 bp. Pyrosequencing resulted in 53,566 reads with an average read length of 308 bp. After manual editing, the final assembly was composed of 84 contigs organized in 30 scaffolds. The combined sequences provided a 430× genome coverage.

## Genome annotation

Genome annotation was carried out using the JGI genome annotation pipeline as previously described [17].

## Genome properties

The genome statistics are provided in Table 3 and Figure 3. The genome of strain DSM 16094T has a total length of 5,689,389 bp and a G+C content of 67.1%. Of the 5,745 genes predicted, 5,650 were protein-coding genes, and 95 RNAs. The majority of the protein-coding genes (76.0%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4

## Insights into the genome

### Plasmids and phages

Genome sequencing of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T resulted in 30 scaffolds. In the species description, it was reported that this strain contains at least seven plasmids (550, 467, 184, 140.8, 110.6, 98.2 and 30.8 kb) [7]. However, the identification of plasmids in the genome was difficult because typical replication modules comprising the characteristic replicase and the adjacent *parAB* partitioning operator are missing [41]. Nevertheless, comprehensive BLASTP searches with plasmid replicases from *Rhodobacterales* revealed the presence of three RepA and two RepB genes, whereas RepABC-type and DnaA-like replicases were absent from the genome sequence. General genomic
features of the chromosome and four putative extrachromosomal replicons are listed in Table 5, whereas locus tags of the replicases and the large *virB4* and *virD4* genes of type IV secretion systems are presented in Table 6. The localization of the chromosomal replication initiator DnaA documents that (at least) scaffold 3 represents the chromosome. The 350 kb scaffold 5 contains a RepA-a type replicase [42] and a characteristic type IV secretion system (T4SS) comprising the relaxase VirD2 and the coupling protein VirD4 as well as the complete *virB* gene cluster for the

transmembrane channel (Table 6 [43]). It probably represents a mobilizable extrachromosomal element. Scaffolds 18 and 28 contain RepA-b and RepB-I type replicases, respectively (Table 5), and may represent two additional plasmids of this species. However, the presence of plasmid replicases does not unequivocally correlate with extrachromosomal elements, as these genes may also reflect inactivated orphans or pseudogenes. Thus, the total number of *S. mucosus* plasmids cannot be exactly determined based on the draft genome sequence.

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Genome Statistics</caption><thead><tr><td>Attribute</td><td>Value</td><td>% of total<sup>a</sup></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Genome size (bp)</td><td>5,689,389</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>DNA coding region (bp)</td><td>5,064,332</td><td>89.01</td></tr><tr><td>DNA G+C content (bp)</td><td>3,815,108</td><td>67.06</td></tr><tr><td>Number of scaffolds</td><td>30</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total genes</td><td>5,745</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>RNA genes</td><td>95</td><td>1.65</td></tr><tr><td>rRNA operons</td><td>4</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>tRNA genes</td><td>83</td><td>1.44</td></tr><tr><td>Protein-coding genes</td><td>5,650</td><td>98.35</td></tr><tr><td>Genes with function prediction (proteins)</td><td>4,365</td><td>75.98</td></tr><tr><td>Genes in paralog clusters</td><td>4,666</td><td>81.22</td></tr><tr><td>Genes assigned to COGs</td><td>4,191</td><td>72.95</td></tr><tr><td>Genes assigned Pfam domains</td><td>4,465</td><td>77.91</td></tr><tr><td>Genes with signal peptides</td><td>512</td><td>8.91</td></tr><tr><td>Genes with transmembrane helices</td><td>1,183</td><td>20.59</td></tr><tr><td>CRISPR repeats</td><td>1</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Graphical map of the largest scaffold. From bottom to the top: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), GC content (black), GC skew (purple/olive).</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 4.** Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories</caption><thead><tr><th>Code</th><th>Value</th><th>%age<sup>a</sup></th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>J</td><td>175</td><td>3.8</td><td>Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis</td></tr><tr><td>A</td><td>0</td><td>0.0</td><td>RNA processing and modification</td></tr><tr><td>K</td><td>350</td><td>7.5</td><td>Transcription</td></tr><tr><td>L</td><td>228</td><td>4.9</td><td>Replication, recombination and repair</td></tr><tr><td>B</td><td>4</td><td>0.1</td><td>Chromatin structure and dynamics</td></tr><tr><td>D</td><td>37</td><td>0.8</td><td>Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning</td></tr><tr><td>Y</td><td>0</td><td>0.0</td><td>Nuclear structure</td></tr><tr><td>V</td><td>47</td><td>1.0</td><td>Defense mechanisms</td></tr><tr><td>T</td><td>179</td><td>3.8</td><td>Signal transduction mechanisms</td></tr><tr><td>M</td><td>289</td><td>6.2</td><td>Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis</td></tr><tr><td>N</td><td>96</td><td>2.1</td><td>Cell motility</td></tr><tr><td>Z</td><td>1</td><td>0.0</td><td>Cytoskeleton</td></tr><tr><td>W</td><td>0</td><td>0.0</td><td>Extracellular structures</td></tr><tr><td>U</td><td>84</td><td>1.8</td><td>Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport</td></tr><tr><td>O</td><td>141</td><td>3.0</td><td>Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones</td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>289</td><td>6.2</td><td>Energy production and conversion</td></tr><tr><td>G</td><td>362</td><td>7.8</td><td>Carbohydrate transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>E</td><td>507</td><td>10.9</td><td>Amino acid transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>F</td><td>95</td><td>2.0</td><td>Nucleotide transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>H</td><td>174</td><td>3.7</td><td>Coenzyme transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>I</td><td>172</td><td>3.7</td><td>Lipid transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>P</td><td>253</td><td>5.4</td><td>Inorganic ion transport and metabolism</td></tr><tr><td>Q</td><td>180</td><td>3.9</td><td>Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism</td></tr><tr><td>R</td><td>583</td><td>12.5</td><td>General function prediction only</td></tr><tr><td>S</td><td>414</td><td>8.9</td><td>Function unknown</td></tr><tr><td>-</td><td>1,554</td><td>27.1</td><td>Not in COGs</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 5.** General genomic features of the chromosome and putative extrachromosomal replicons from *S. mucosus* DSM 16094<sup>††</sup></caption><thead><tr><th>Replicon</th><th>Scaffold</th><th>Replicase</th><th>Length (bp)</th><th>GC (%)</th><th>Topology</th><th>No. Genes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chromosome</td><td>3</td><td>DnaA</td><td>550,914</td><td>68</td><td>linear**</td><td>522</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 1</td><td>5</td><td>RepA-a</td><td>349,771</td><td>67</td><td>linear**</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 2*</td><td>18</td><td>RepA-b</td><td>45,096</td><td>59</td><td>linear**</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 3*</td><td>28</td><td>RepB-I<br>RepA-c</td><td>15,330</td><td>70</td><td>linear**</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 4*</td><td>2</td><td>RepB-II</td><td>702,451</td><td>62</td><td>linear**</td><td>709</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.</footnote>

<footnote>† Number of genes deduced from automatic annotation.</footnote>

<footnote>*assignment uncertain</footnote>

<footnote>**circularity not experimentally validated.</footnote>
<table><caption>**Table 6.** Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) locus tags of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T genes for the initiation of replication and type IV secretion systems (T4SS) required for conjugation</caption><thead><tr><th>Replicon</th><th>Replication initiation</th><th>Type IV Secretion</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Chromosome</td><td>Replicase</td><td>VirB4</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 1</td><td>DnaA</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 2*</td><td>RepA-a</td><td>salmuc_02871</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 3*</td><td>RepA-b</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 4*</td><td>RepB-I</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 4*</td><td>RepA-c</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Plasmid 4*</td><td>RepB-II</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>

A potential fourth plasmid is represented by the large 702 kb scaffold 2 that contains a RepA-c as well as a RepB-II replicase (salmuc_01514; salmuc_01780). However, the presence of typical CRISPRs representing the defense system against phage attacks [44] favors a chromosomal affiliation for scaffold 2.

The genome sequence of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T reveals that this strain must encounter continuous attack by phages. Regions of genes related to prophages are found at several sites throughout the genome (e.g., salmuc_02795 - 02809 and salmuc_02619 - 02632). Several genes encoding cas proteins (salmuc_01330, salmuc_01331 and 01333) indicate that a CRISPR defense system is functional in this strain. The large number of phage-related genes integrated into the genome could mediate frequent rearrangements of the DNA structure in this strain. Furthermore, this could indicate a possible exchange of genes with other species attacked by similar phages.

## Morphological traits reflected in the genome

Analysis of the genome sequence of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T revealed the presence of a high number of genes associated with putative production and biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides (salmuc_00030, salmuc_00724, salmuc_01174, salmuc_01693, salmuc_02911, salmuc_3919, salmuc_04853 and salmuc_05511). This finding is in accord with a recent study by Llamas and colleagues, who characterized the exopolysaccharides produced by strain A3T in detail [11]. Interestingly, genes putatively associated with cellulose synthesis (salmuc_02978 and salmuc_02979) were also found.

Surprisingly, many genes involved in flagellar motility (e.g., salmuc_02151 - salmuc_02191, salmuc_04184 - 04236) and chemotaxis (e.g., salmuc_03613 - 03617) were observed, although

this strain was described as non-motile in the original species description [7].

Genes associated with the synthesis of polyhydroxy-alkanoates as storage compound (e.g., salmuc_03738, salmuc_03739 and salmuc_05206) as well as phasin (salmuc_03343) were also found.

## Nutrient limitation

Many saline environments, e.g., the central oceans, are characterized by a limitation of the essential nutrients iron and phosphorous. *S. mucosus* seems to have installed several mechanisms to overcome growth limitation caused by depletion of both elements. Iron is mainly acquired by the synthesis of siderophores and transported into the cell in its chelated form. Genes encoding ABC transporters for siderophores of the hydroxamate type (salmuc_02461 - 02463 and salmuc_02667 - 02669), as well as for hemin-bound iron (salmuc_00710 - 00712) were found. To satisfy the need for phosphorous, strain DSM 16094T is able to mobilize organic phosphonates as alternatives to phosphate, which is indicated by a continuous array of 22 genes (salmuc_00786 - 00807) involved in the uptake and utilization of phosphonates.

## Metabolic plasticity

In contrast to the published description of *S. mucosus* [7], which suggests a strictly aerobic and chemoheterotrophic metabolism, the genome reveals an astonishing metabolic versatility. Besides genes for the degradation of organic substrates, we also found genes encoding enzymes for the utilization of alternative electron donors enabling facultative lithotrophic growth: a Sox multienzyme complex encoded by the genes salmuc_00587 - 00597 could be utilized for the oxidation of thiosulfate to sulfate, while molecular hydrogen may be utilized as electron donor by a

<footnote>*assignment uncertain.</footnote>
multimeric uptake hydrogenase of the [NiFe]-type (salmuc_04814 - 04830). A further potential substrate is carbon monoxide, which might be oxidized by an aerobic-type carbon monoxide dehydrogenase encoded by the genes salmuc_05576 - 05578. Additional genes encoding subunits of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase were found dispersed at several sites in the genome. The metabolic plasticity of this species is further reflected in a multiple branched electron transport chain. The cascade starts from a NADH dehydrogenase (salmuc_03065 - 03088) or succinate dehydrogenase complex (salmuc_00519 - 00521), where ubiquinone is reduced to ubiquinol. Electrons can either be transferred from ubiquinol via a terminal cytochrome *bd* ubiquinol oxidase (salmuc_05386 - 05387) directly to oxygen, or transferred to a cytochrome *bc*₁ complex reducing cytochromes. Reduced cytochromes can then interact with terminal oxidases reducing oxygen. Genes for at least two different cytochrome *c* oxidases were detected, being either of a putative *caa*₃- (salmuc_05284 - 05285) or *cbb*₃-type (salmuc_00548 - 00551). The chemiosmotic gradient generated in the electron transport chain can be used for the synthesis of ATP by an ATP synthase complex of the FoF1 type (salmuc_01101 - 01110). According to the genome sequence there is also the possibility that nitrate could be used as alternative electron acceptor in the absence of oxygen. In addition to a periplasmic nitrate reductase of the Nap-type (salmuc_04127 - 04129) genes for a copper-containing dissimilatory nitrite reductase (salmuc_05547), a nitric oxide reductase (salmuc_05554 and salmuc_05555) and a nitrous oxide reductase (salmuc_04123) were detected, resulting in a complete pathway for denitrification of nitrate to molecular nitrogen.

Interestingly, the genome sequence of *S. mucosus* DSM 16094T further revealed the presence of a high number of genes associated with putative photoautotrophy. Next to a photosynthesis gene cluster (salmuc_05125 - 05164) RuBisCO-associated genes (samuc_03532 - 03534) involved in the fixation of CO₂ via the Calvin-Benson cycle (salmuc_03531 - 03539) were observed. The presence of such genes indicates a putative photoautotrophic growth under certain conditions. The genome of this strain also encodes a blue light-activated photosensor (BLUF, salmuc_00318) that may play a role in the light-dependent regulation of photosynthesis genes. It is tempting to specu-

late that a genetic inventory allowing photoautotrophy reflects an evolutionary position at the root of the *Roseobacter* clade. Several members of this lineage are known to be capable of an aerobic photoheterotrophic metabolism, whereas photoautotrophic growth has not been reported yet. By analogy, with the scenario proposed for the evolution of aerobic photoheterotrophic *Gamma-proteobacteria* [45,46], representatives of the *Roseobacter* clade may have lost genes for CO₂ fixation following adaptation to aerobic environments characterized by electron donor limitation, thereby preventing utilization of the Calvin-Benson cycle, which demands an abundant supply of reducing power and energy.

However, none of the novel metabolic traits, which are predicted based on the genome sequence, could be verified experimentally in our laboratory so far. One explanation may be that under unfavorable growth conditions, e.g. anaerobiosis, lysogenic phages become activated, so that growth does not become apparent.

## Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Iljana Schröder for technical assistance and Meike Döppner for DNA extraction and quality control (both at the Leibniz-Institute DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the German Research Foundation (DFG) Transregio-SFB51 *Roseobacter* grant.

## References

1. Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H. Environmental biology of the marine *Roseobacter* lineage. *Annu Rev Microbiol* 2006; 60:255-280. [PubMed](http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142115)

2. Moran MA, Belas R, Schell MA, González JM, Sun F, Sun S, Binder BJ, Edmonds J, Ye W, Orcutt B, et al. Ecological genomics of marine Roseobacteria. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2007; **73**:4559-4569. [PubMed](http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02580-06)

3. Wagner-Döbler I, Ballhausen B, Berger M, Brinkhoff T, Bunk B, Cypionka C, Daniel R, Drepper T, Gerdts G, Hahnke S, et al. The complete genome sequence of the algal symbiont *Dinoroseobacter shibae*: a hitchhiker's guide to live in the sea. *ISME J* 2010; **4**:61-77. [PubMed](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.94)

4. Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA. Overview of the marine *Roseobacter* lineage. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2005; **71**:5665-5677. [PubMed](http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02580-06)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.5665-5677.2005

5. González JM, Simó R, Massana R, Covert JS, Casamayor EO, Pedrós-Alió C, Moran MA. Bacterial community structure associated with a dimethylsulfoniopropionate-producing North Atlantic algal bloom. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2000; **66**:4237-4246. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4237-4246.2000

6. González JM, Covert JS, Whitman WB, Henriksen JR, Mayer F, Scharf B, Schmitt R, Buchan A, Fuhrman JA, Kiene RP, et al. *Silicibacter pomeroyi* sp. nov. and *Roseovarius nubinhibens* sp. nov., dimethylsulfiopropionate-demethylating bacteria from the marine environments. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2003; **53**:1261-1269. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02491-0

7. Martínez-Cánovas MJ, Quesada E, Martínez-Checa F, del Moral A, Béjar V. *Salipiger mucescens* gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, exopolysaccharide-producing bacterium isolated from hypersaline soil, belonging to the *a-Proteobacteria*. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2004; **54**:1735-1740. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63166-0

8. Kushner DJ, Kamekura M. Physiology of halophilic eubacteria. In: Rodriguez-Valera F. (Ed.), *Halophilic Bacteria* 1988, Vol. 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 109-138.

9. Ventosa A, Nieto JJ, Oren A. Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. *Microbiol Mol Biol Rev* 1998; **62**:504-544. PubMed

10. Euzéby JP. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/s/salipiger.html.

11. Llamas I, Mata JA, Tallon R, Bressollier P, Urdaci MC, Quesada EB, Béjar V. Characterization of the exopolysaccharide produced by *Salipiger mucosus* A3<sup>T</sup>, a halophilic species belonging to the *Alphaproteobacteria*, isolated on the Spanish mediterranean seaboard. *Mar Drugs* 2010; **8**:2240-2251. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md8082240

12. Göker M, Klenk HP. Phylogeny-driven target selection for large-scale genome-sequencing (and other) projects. *Stand Genomic Sci* 2013; **8**:360-374. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3446951

13. Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of *Archaea* and *Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol* 2010; **33**:175-182. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003

14. Göker M, Cleland D, Saunders E, Lapidus A, Noiran M, Lucas S, Hammon N, Deshpande S, Cheng JF, Tapia R, et al. Complete genome sequence of

*Isosphaera pallida* type strain (IS1B<sup>T</sup>). *Stand Genetic Sci* 2011; **4**:63-71. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.1533840

15. Hess PN, De Moraes Russo CA. An empirical test of the midpoint rooting method. *Biol J Linn Soc* Lond 2007; **92**:669-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00864.x

16. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, Smirnova T, Nosrat B, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. *Nucleic Acids Res* 2012; **40**:D571-D579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1100

17. Fiebig A, Riedel T, Gronow S, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence of the reddish-pigmented *Rubellimicrobium thermophilum* type strain (DSM 16684<sup>T</sup>), a member of the *Roseobacter* clade. *Stand Genomic Sci* 2013; **8**:480-490. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4247911

18. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. *Nat Biotechnol* 2008; **26**:541-547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360

19. Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, Garrity GM, Gilbert J, Glöckner FO, Hirschman L, Karsch-Mzrachi I, et al. Clarifying Concepts and Terms in Biodiversity Informatics. *PLoS Biol* 2011; **9**:e1001088. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088

20. Woese CR, Kandler O, Weelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms. Proposal for the domains *Archaea* and *Bacteria*. *Proc Natl Acad Sci USA* 1990; **87**:4576-4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

21. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. *Proteobacteria* phyl nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Stanley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Sytematic Bacteriology, second edition. Vol. 2 (The *Proteobacteria*), part B (The *Gammaproteobacteria*), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.

22. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class I. *Alphaproteobacteria* class. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Stanley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Sytematic Bacteriology, second edition. Vol. 2 (The *Proteobacteria*), part C (The *Alphao-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilon-proteobacteria*), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.

23. Validation List No. 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2006; **57**:1-10.
56:1-6. PubMed

http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64188-0

24. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order III. Rhodobacterales ord. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition. vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part C (The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.

25. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family I. Rhodobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition. vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part C (The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.

26. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 54, part 5, of the IJSEM. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2005; **55**:3-5.

PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63563-0

27. BAuA. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups. TRBA 2010; **466**:93.

28. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. *Nat Genet* 2000; **25**:25-29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556

29. Buddruhs N, Pradella S, Göker M, Päuker O, Michael V, Pukall R, Spröer C, Schumann P, Petersen J, Brinkhoff T. Molecular and phenotypic analyses reveal the non-identity of the *Phaeobacter gallaeciensis* type strain deposits CIP 105210T and DSM 17395. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2013; **63**:4340-4349. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.053900-0

30. Vaas LAI, Sikorski J, Michael VG, Göker M, Klenk HP. Visualization and curve-parameter estimation strategies for efficient exploration of phenotype microarray kinetics. *PLoS ONE* 2012; **7**:e34846. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034846

31. Vaas LAI, Sikorsky J, Hofner B, Fiebig A, Buddruhs N, Klenk HPG, Göker M. opm: an R package for analyzing OmniLog phenotype microarray data. *Bioinformatics* 2013; **29**:1823-1824. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt291

32. Vaas LAI, Marheine M, Sikorski JG, Göker M, Schumacher M. Impacts of pr-10a overexpression at the molecular and the phenotypic level. *Int J Mol Sci* 2013; **14**:15141-15166. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms140715141

33. Wagner-Döbler I, Rheims H, Felske A, Pukall R, Tindall BJ. *Jannaschia helgolandensis* gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel abundant member of the marine

Roseobacter clade from the North Sea. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2003; **53**:731-738. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02377-0

34. Gosink JJ, Herwig RP, Staley JT. *Octadecabacter arcticus* gen. nov., sp. nov., and *Octadecabacter antarcticus* gen. nov., sp. nov., non-pigmented, psychrophilic gas vacuolate bacteria from polar sea ice and water. *Syst Appl Microbiol* 1997; **20**:356-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(97)80003-3

35. Lafay B, Ruimy R, Rasch de Traubenberg C, Breittmeyer V, Gauthier MJ, Christen R. *Roseobacter algicola* sp. nov., a new marine bacterium isolated from the phycosphere of the toxin-producing dinoflagellate *Prorocentrum lima*. *Int J Syst Bacteriol* 1995; **45**:290-296. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-290

36. Pukall R, Buntefuss D, Frühling A, Rohde M, Kroppenstedt RM, Burghardt J, Lebaron P, Bernard L, Stackebrandt E. *Sulfitobacter mediterraneus* sp. nov., a new sulfite-oxidizing member of the a-Proteobacteria. *Int J Syst Bacteriol* 1999; **49**:513-519. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-2-513

37. Labrenz M, Tindall BJ, Lawson PA, Collins MD, Schumann P, Hirsch P. *Staleya guttiformis* gen. nov., sp. nov. α-3-Proteobacteria from hypersaline, heliothermal and meromictic Antarctic Ekho lake. *Int J Syst Evol Microbiol* 2000; **50**:303-313. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-1-303

38. Markowitz VM, Chen IMA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P, et al. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. *Nucleic Acids Res* 2012; **40**:D115-D122. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1044

39. List of growth media used at the DSMZ: http://www.dmsz.de/catalogues/catalogo-microorganisms/culture-technology/list-of-media-for-microorganisms.html.

40. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG, Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. *Biopreserv Biobank* 2011; **9**:51-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bio.2010.0029

41. Petersen J. Phylogeny and compatibility: plasmid classification in the genomics era. *Arch Microbiol* 2011; **193**:313-321. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/3390/ijms140715141

42. Petersen J, Brinkmann H, Berger M, Brinkhoff T, Päuker O, Pradella S. Origin and evolution of a novel DnaA-like plasmid replication type in *Rhodobacterales*. *Mol Biol Evol* 2011; **28**:1229-1240. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq310
43. Cascales E, Christie PJ. The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. *Nat Rev Microbiol* 2003; **1**:137-149. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro753

44. Westra ER, Swarts DC, Staals RH, Jore MM, Brouns SJ, van der Oost J. The CRISPRs, they are a-changin': how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity. *Annu Rev Genet* 2012; **46**:311-339. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155447

45. Spring S, Lünsdorf H, Fuchs BM, Tindall BJ. The photosynthetic apparatus and its regulation in the

aerobic gammaproteobacterium *Congregibacter litoralis* gen. nov., sp. nov. *PLoS ONE* 2009; **4:e4866**. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004866

46. Spring S, Riedel T. Mixotrophic growth of bacteriochlorophyll a-containing members of the OM60/NOR5 clade of marine *Gammaproteobacteria* is carbon-starvation independent and correlates with the cellular redox state. *BMC Microbiol* 2013; **13**:117. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-117