Michel Pierre Janisse. Pupillometry : The psychology of the pupillary response. (*No Title*), 1977.

Eun-Sook Jee, Yong-Jeon Jeong, Chong Hui Kim, and Hisato Kobayashi. Sound design for emotion and intention expression of socially interactive robots. *Intelligent Service Robotics*, 3:199-206, 2010.

Bernard C Jiang and Charles A Gainer Jr. A cause-and-effect analysis of robot accidents. *Journal of Occupational accidents*, 9(1):27-45, 1987.

Debra G Jones and Mica R Endsley. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. *Aviation, space, and environmental medicine*, 1996.

Lucas Joseph, Vincent Padois, and Guillaume Morel. Online minimization of the projected mass of a robot for safe workspace sharing with a human. In *Workshop on" Human movement science for physical human-robot collaboration" at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation*, 2019.

David B Kaber and Mica R Endsley. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. *Theoretical issues in ergonomics science*, 5(2):113-153, 2004.

Waldemar Karwowski and Mansour Rahimi. Worker selection of safe speed and idle condition in simulated monitoring of two industrial robots. *Ergonomics*, 34(5):531-546, 1991.

Jon R Katzenbach and Douglas K Smith. *The wisdom of teams : Creating the high-performance organization*. Harvard Business Review Press, 2015.

Harmish Khambhaita, Jorge Rios-Martinez, and Rachid Alami. Head-body motion coordination for human aware robot navigation. In *9th International workshop on Human-Friendly Robotics (HFR 2016)*, page 8p, 2016.

Chih-Hung King, Martin O Culjat, Miguel L Franco, Catherine E Lewis, Erik P Dutson, Warren S Grundfest, and James W Bisley. Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robot-assisted surgery. *IEEE transactions on haptics*, 2(2):103-110, 2009.

Tadashi Kitamura, Tomoko Tahara, and Ken-Ichi Asami. How can a robot have consciousness? *Advanced Robotics*, 14(4):263-275, 2000.

Mark L Knapp, Judith A Hall, and Terrence G Horgan. *Nonverbal communication in human interaction*. Cengage Learning, 2013.

Ross A Knepper, Christoforos I Mavrogiannis, Julia Proft, and Claire Liang. Implicit communication in a joint action. In *Proceedings of the 2017 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction*, pages 283-292, 2017.

Günther Knoblich, Stephen Butterfill, and Natalie Sebanz. Psychological research on joint action : theory and data. *Psychology of learning and motivation*, 54:59-101, 2011.

Tobias Kopp, Marco Baumgartner, and Steffen Kinkel. Success factors for introducing industrial human-robot interaction in practice : an empirically driven framework. *The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology*, 112:685-704, 2021.
Markus Koppenborg, Peter Nickel, Birgit Naber, Andy Lungfiel, and Michael Huelke. Effects of movement speed and predictability in human-robot collaboration. *Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries*, 27(4):197-209, 2017.

Robin SS Kramer, Isabel Arend, and Robert Ward. Perceived health from biological motion predicts voting behaviour. *Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology*, 63(4):625-632, 2010.

Jan-Louis Kruger, Esté Hefer, and Gordon Matthew. Measuring the impact of subtitles on cognitive load: Eye tracking and dynamic audiovisual texts. In *Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa*, pages 62–66, 2013.

Dana Kulić and Elizabeth Croft. Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion. *Robotica*, 25(1):13–27, 2007.

Shitij Kumar, Celal Savur, and Ferat Sahin. Survey of human-robot collaboration in industrial settings: Awareness, intelligence, and compliance. *IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems*, 51(1):280–297, 2020.

Hanna Kurniawati. Partially observable markov decision processes and robotics. *Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems*, 5:253–277, 2022.

Sinem Kuz, C Schlick, G Lindgaard, and D Moore. Anthropomorphic motion control for safe and efficient human-robot cooperation in assembly system. In *Proceedings of the 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA*, volume 9, 2015.

Xavier Lamy, Frédéric Colledani, Franck Geffard, Yvan Measson, and Guillaume Morel. Achieving efficient and stable comanipulation through adaptation to changes in human arm impedance. In *2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation*, pages 265–271. IEEE, 2009.

Brenda Hiu Yan Law, Po-Yin Cheung, Sylvia van Os, Caroline Fray, and Georg M Schmölzer. Effect of monitor positioning on visual attention and situation awareness during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised simulation study. *Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition*, 105(3):285–291, 2020.

John K Layer, Waldemar Karwowski, and Allen Furr. The effect of cognitive demands and perceived quality of work life on human performance in manufacturing environments. *International journal of industrial ergonomics*, 39(2):413–421, 2009.

Hosang Lee and Jaeheung Park. Operational space control under actuator bandwidth limitation. In *2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)*, pages 12847–12852. IEEE, 2021.

Gregory Lemasurier, Gal Bejerano, Victoria Albanese, Jenna Parrillo, Holly A Yanco, Nicholas Amerson, Rebecca Hetrick, and Elizabeth Phillips. Methods for expressing robot intent for human-robot collaboration in shared workspaces. *ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)*, 10(4):1–27, 2021.

Shuang Liu, Xiaoru Wanyan, and Damin Zhuang. Modeling the situation awareness by the analysis of cognitive process. *Bio-medical materials and engineering*, 24(6):2311–2318, 2014.
Joseph B Lyons. Being transparent about transparency : A model for human-robot interaction. In *2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series*, 2013.

Ali Ahmad Malik and Arne Bilberg. Complexity-based task allocation in human-robot collaborative assembly. In *Industrial Robot : the international journal of robotics research and application*, 46(4):471–480, 2019.

Timo Malm, Juhani Viitaniemi, Jyrki Latokartano, Salla Lind, Outi Venho-Ahonen, and Jari Schabel. Safety of interactive robotics—learning from accidents. In *International Journal of Social Robotics*, 2(3):221–227, 2010.

Nicolas Mansard, Olivier Stasse, Paul Evrard, and Abderrahmane Kheddar. A versatile generalized inverted kinematics implementation for collaborative working humanoid robots : The stack of tasks. In *2009 International conference on advanced robotics*, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2009.

Jeremy A Marvel, Shelly Bagchi, Megan Zimmerman, and Brian Antonishek. Towards effective interface designs for collaborative hri in manufacturing : Metrics and measures. *ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)*, 9(4):1–55, 2020.

George Mather and Linda Murdoch. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B : Biological Sciences*, 258(1353):273–279, 1994.

Eloise Matheson, Riccardo Minto, Emanuele GG Zampieri, Maurizio Faccio, and Giulio Rosati. Human-robot collaboration in manufacturing applications : A review. *Robotics*, 8(4):100, 2019.

Takafumi Matsumaru, Kazuya Iwase, Kyouhei Akiyama, Takashi Kusada, and Tomotaka Ito. Mobile robot with eyeball expression as the preliminary-announcement and display of the robot's following motion. *Autonomous Robots*, 18:231–246, 2005.

Takafumi Matsumaru, Takashi Kusada, and Kazuya Iwase. Mobile robot with preliminary-announcement function of forthcoming motion using light-ray. In *2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems*, pages 1516–1523. IEEE, 2006.

Alyxander David May, Christian Dondrup, and Marc Hanheide. Show me your moves! conveying navigation intention of a mobile robot to humans. In *2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR)*, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2015.

John McCarthy. Making robots conscious of their mental states. In *Machine Intelligence 15*, pages 3–17, 1995.

Angus McKerral and Kristen Pammer. Identifying objective behavioural measures of expert driver situation awareness. *Accident Analysis & Prevention*, 163:106465, 2021.

S Merchant, Yongjin Kwon, T Schnell, T Etherington, and T Vogl. Evaluation of synthetic vision information system (svis) displays based on pilot performance. In *20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37219)*, volume 1, pages 2C1–1. IEEE, 2001.

Ramy Meziane, Ping Li, Martin J-D Otis, Hassan Ezzaidi, and Philippe Cardou. Safer hybrid workspace using human-robot interaction while sharing production activities. In *2014 IEEE*
*International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) Proceedings*, pages 37–42. IEEE, 2014.

John Michael, Natalie Sebanz, and Günther Knoblich. Observing joint action: Coordination creates commitment. *Cognition*, 157:106–113, 2016.

George Michalos, Sotiris Makris, Panagiota Tsarouchi, Toni Guasch, Dimitris Kontovrakis, and George Chryssolouris. Design considerations for safe human-robot collaborative workplaces. *Procedia CIRP*, 37:248–253, 2015.

Masahiko Mikawa, Yuriko Yoshikawa, and Makoto Fujisawa. Expression of intention by ro-
tational head movements for teleoperated mobile robot. In *2018 IEEE 15th international
workshop on advanced motion control (AMC)*, pages 249–254. IEEE, 2018.

AJung Moon, Chris AC Parker, Elizabeth A Croft, and HF Machiel Van der Loos. Did you see it hesitate ?-empirically grounded design of hesitation trajectories for collaborative robots. In *2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems*, pages 1994–1999. IEEE, 2011.

Kristin Moore and Leo Gugerty. Development of a novel measure of situation awareness : The case for eye movement analysis. In *Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting*, volume 54, pages 1650–1654. SAGE Publications Sage CA : Los Angeles, CA, 2010.

Nina-Jo Moore, M Hickson, and DW Stacks. *Nonverbal communication*. New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.

C David Mortensen. *Communication theory*. Routledge, 2017.

Rainer Müller, Matthias Vette, and Aaron Geenen. Skill-based dynamic task allocation in human-robot-cooperation with the example of welding application. *Procedia Manufacturing*, 11:13–21, 2017.

Bilge Mutlu, Fumitaka Yamaoka, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. Non-verbal leakage in robots : communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In *Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction*, pages 69–76, 2009.

Bilge Mutlu, Nicholas Roy, and Selma Šabanović. Cognitive human-robot interaction. *Springer handbook of robotics*, pages 1907–1934, 2016.

Manisha Natarajan and Matthew Gombolay. Effects of anthropomorphism and accountability on trust in human robot interaction. In *Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 33–42, 2020.

Donald A Norman. Affordance, conventions, and design. *interactions*, 6(3):38–43, 1999.

Allison M Okamura. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. *Current opinion in urology*, 19(1):102, 2009.

Yusuke Okuno, Takayuki Kanda, Michita Imai, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. Providing route directions : design of robot's utterance, gesture, and timing. In *Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction*, pages 53–60, 2009.
Calvin KL Or, Vincent G Duffy, and Chui Chui Cheung. Perception of safe robot idle time in virtual reality and real industrial environments. *International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics*, 39(5):807-812, 2009.

Sabrina B Orique and Laurel Despins. Evaluating situation awareness : an integrative review. *Western journal of nursing research*, 40(3):388-424, 2018.

Elisabeth Pacherie. How does it feel to act together? *Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences*, 13:25-46, 2014.

Lucas Paletta, Amir Dini, Cornelia Murko, Saeed Yahyanejad, Michael Schwarz, Gerald Lodon, Stefan Ladstätter, Gerhard Paar, and Rosemarie Velik. Towards real-time probabilistic evaluation of situation awareness from human gaze in human-robot interaction. In *Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 247-248, 2017.

Carolyn Parkinson, Trent T Walker, Sarah Memmi, and Thalia Wheatley. Emotions are understood from biological motion across remote cultures. *Emotion*, 17(3):459, 2017.

Michael Peshkin and J Edward Colgate. Cobots. *Industrial Robot : An International Journal*, 26(5):335-341, 1999.

Henning Petruck, Sinem Kuz, Alexander Mertens, and Christopher Schlick. Increasing safety in human-robot collaboration by using anthropomorphic speed profiles of robot movements. In *Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing : Managing the Enterprise of the Future : Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing*, July 27-31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA, pages 135-145. Springer, 2016.

Boleslaw Porankiewicz, Chiaki Tanaka, et al. Cutting forces by peripheral cutting of low density wood species. *BioResources*, 2(4):671-681, 2007.

Baptiste Prébot. *Représentation partagée et travail collaboratif en contexte C2 : monitoring d'opérateurs en situation simulée de command and control*. PhD thesis, Bordeaux, 2020.

David Premack and Guy Woodruff. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? *Behavioral and brain sciences*, 1(4):515-526, 1978.

Jens Rasmussen. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. *IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics*, (3):257-266, 1983.

Robin Read and Tony Belpaeme. Situational context directs how people affectively interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances. In *Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction*, pages 41-48, 2014.

Robin Read and Tony Belpaeme. People interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances categorically. *International Journal of Social Robotics*, 8:31-50, 2016.

James Reason. *Human error*. Cambridge university press, 1990.

Nicolas Régis, Frédéric Dehais, Emmanuel Rachelson, Charles Thooris, Sergio Pizziol, Mickaël Causse, and Catherine Tessier. Formal detection of attentional tunneling in human operator-
automation interactions. *IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems*, 44(3):326–336, 2014.

Ronald A Rensink. Change detection. *Annual review of psychology*, 53(1):245–277, 2002.

Jennifer M Riley and Mica R Endsley. The hunt for situation awareness: Human-robot interaction in search and rescue. In *Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting*, volume 48-3, pages 693–697. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2004.

Jennifer M Riley, Laura D Strater, Sheryl L Chappell, Erik S Connors, and Mica R Endsley. Situation awareness in human-robot interaction: Challenges and user interface requirements. In *Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations*, pages 171–192. CRC Press, 2016.

Giacomo Rizzolatti and Laila Craighero. The mirror-neuron system. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.*, 27: 169–192, 2004.

Ruth Rosenholtz. Capabilities and limitations of peripheral vision. *Annual review of vision science*, 2:437–457, 2016.

William B Rouse and Nancy M Morris. On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. *Psychological bulletin*, 100(3):349, 1986.

Wilfred Rouwhorst, Ronald Verhoeven, Marieke Suijkerbuijk, Tanja Bos, Anneloes Maij, Mick Vermaat, and Roy Arents. Use of touch screen display applications for aircraft flight control. In *2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)*, pages 1–10. IEEE, 2017.

Sayanti Roy, Trey Smith, Brian Coltin, and Tom Williams. I need your help... or do I? maintaining situation awareness through performative autonomy. In *Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 122–131, 2023.

Eduardo Salas, Terry L Dickinson, Sharolyn A Converse, and Scott I Tannenbaum. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. 1992.

Eduardo Salas, Carolyn Prince, David P Baker, and Lisa Shrestha. Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. *Human factors*, 37(1):123–136, 1995.

Maha Salem, Stefan Kopp, Ipke Wachsmuth, Katharina Rohlfing, and Frank Joublin. Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture. *International Journal of Social Robotics*, 4:201–217, 2012.

Joseph Salini, Vincent Padois, and Philippe Bidaud. Synthesis of complex humanoid whole-body behavior: A focus on sequencing and tasks transitions. In *2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation*, pages 1283–1290. IEEE, 2011.

Paul M Salmon, Neville A Stanton, Guy H Walker, Chris Baber, Daniel P Jenkins, Richard McMaster, and Mark S Young. What really is going on? review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. *Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science*, 9(4):297–323, 2008.
Paul M Salmon, Neville A Stanton, Guy H Walker, Daniel Jenkins, Darshna Ladva, Laura Raf-ferty, and Mark Young. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems : Comparison of measures study. *International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics*, 39(3):490–500, 2009.

Jean-Marc Salotti and Ephraim Suhir. Degraded situation awareness risk assessment in the aerospace domain. In *2019 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace)*, pages 39–43. IEEE, 2019.

Jean-Marc Salotti, Eric Ferreri, Olivier Ly, and David Daney. Classification of Cobotic Systems. *Ingénierie cognitique*, 1(1), January 2018. URL https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01943946.

Eduardo Navarra Satuf, Eugenius Kaszkurewicz, Roberto Schirru, and Mario Cesar Mello Massa de Campos. Situation awareness measurement of an ecological interface designed to operator support during alarm floods. *International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics*, 53:179–192, 2016.

Paul Saulnier, Ehud Sharlin, and Saul Greenberg. Exploring minimal nonverbal interruption in hri. In *2011 RO-MAN*, pages 79–86. IEEE, 2011.

Guido Schillaci, Saša Bodiroža, and Verena Vanessa Hafner. Evaluating the effect of saliency detection and attention manipulation in human-robot interaction. *International Journal of Social Robotics*, 5:139–152, 2013.

David Schuster, Florian Jentsch, Thomas Fincannon, and Scott Ososky. The impact of type and level of automation on situation awareness and performance in human-robot interaction. In *Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition : 10th International Conference, EPCE 2013, Held as Part of HCI International 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21-26, 2013, Proceedings, Part I 10*, pages 252–260. Springer, 2013.

Markus Schwenk and Kai O Arras. R2-d2 reloaded : a flexible sound synthesis system for sonic human-robot interaction design. In *The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication*, pages 161–167. IEEE, 2014.

Natalie Sebanz and Chris Frith. Beyond simulation? neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others. *Nature neuroscience*, 7(1):5–6, 2004.

Natalie Sebanz, Harold Bekkering, and Günther Knoblich. Joint action : bodies and minds moving together. *Trends in cognitive sciences*, 10(2):70–76, 2006.

Claude Elwood Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. *The Bell system technical journal*, 27(3):379–423, 1948.

Scott Shappell, Cristy Detwiler, Kali Holcomb, Carla Hackworth, Albert Boquet, and Douglas A Wiegmann. Human error and commercial aviation accidents : an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. *Human factors*, 49(2):227–242, 2007.

Yu Shi, Natalie Ruiz, Ronnie Taib, Eric Choi, and Fang Chen. Galvanic skin response (gsr) as an index of cognitive load. In *CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems*, pages 2651–2656, 2007.

Moondeep C Shrestha, Ayano Kobayashi, Tomoya Onishi, Hayato Yanagawa, Yuta Yokoyama, Erika Uno, Alexander Schmitz, Mitsuhiro Kamezaki, and Shigeki Sugano. Exploring the use
of light and display indicators for communicating directional intent. In *2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)*, pages 1651–1656. IEEE, 2016.

Bruno Siciliano and J-JE Slotine. A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. In *Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics' Robots in Unstructured Environments*, pages 1211–1216. IEEE, 1991.

Ari Silvola and R Andrew Russell. Robot communication via substrate vibrations. In *Proceedings of the 2005 Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA) Sydney, Australia*, pages 239–244, 2005.

Herbert A Simon. The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. *Cognitive psychology*, 7(2):268–288, 1975.

Antun Skuric, Vincent Padois, and David Daney. On-line force capability evaluation based on efficient polytope vertex search. In *2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)*, pages 1700–1706. IEEE, 2021.

Sichao Song and Seiji Yamada. Expressing emotions through color, sound, and vibration with an appearance-constrained social robot. In *Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 2–11, 2017.

Sichao Song and Seiji Yamada. Effect of expressive lights on human perception and interpretation of functional robot. In *Extended abstracts of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems*, pages 1–6, 2018.

Matthijs TJ Spaan. Partially observable markov decision processes. In *Reinforcement learning : State-of-the-art*, pages 387–414. Springer, 2012.

Tim Claudius Stratmann and Susanne Boll. Demon hunt-the role of endsley's demons of situation awareness in maritime accidents. In *Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development*, pages 203–212. Springer, 2016.

Nobaru Sugimoto and Kunitomo Kawaguchi. Fault tree analysis of hazards created by robots. In *Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Industrial Robots and Robot*, volume 7, pages 9–13, 1983.

Ephraim Suhir, Sami Lini, Christophe Bey, Jean-Marc Salotti, Sylvain Hourlier, and Bernard Claverie. Probabilistic modelling of the concept of anticipation in aviation. *Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science*, 16(1):69–85, 2015.

Tina Sundelin, B Karshikoff, E Axelsson, C Olgart Höglund, Mats Lekander, and John Axelson. Sick man walking : Perception of health status from body motion. *Brain, behavior, and immunity*, 48:53–56, 2015.

Daniel Szafir, Bilge Mutlu, and Terry Fong. Communicating directionality in flying robots. In *Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 19–26, 2015.

Yoshihiko Takahashi, Naoya Hasegawa, Katsumi Takahashi, and Takuro Hatakeyama. Human interface using pc display with head pointing device for eating assist robot and emotional
evaluation by gsr sensor. In *Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 01CH37164)*, volume 4, pages 3674–3679. IEEE, 2001.

Paul Taylor. *Text-to-speech synthesis*. Cambridge university press, 2009.

Richard M Taylor. Situational awareness rating technique (sart) : The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In *Situational awareness*, pages 111–128. Routledge, 2017.

Hamish Tennent, Dylan Moore, Malte Jung, and Wendy Ju. Good vibrations : How consequential sounds affect perception of robotic arms. In *2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)*, pages 928–935. IEEE, 2017.

Yunus Terzioğlu, Bilge Mutlu, and Erol Şahin. Designing social cues for collaborative robots : the role of gaze and breathing in human-robot collaboration. In *Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction*, pages 343–357, 2020.

Benjamin Thompson, Bruce C Hansen, Robert F Hess, and Nikolaus F Troje. Peripheral vision : Good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? *Journal of Vision*, 7(10) :12–12, 2007.

Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. Understanding and sharing intentions : The origins of cultural cognition. *Behavioral and brain sciences*, 28(5) :675–691, 2005.

Anne Treisman. Preattentive processing in vision. *Computer vision, graphics, and image processing*, 31(2) :156–177, 1985.

Nikolaus F Troje. The little difference : Fourier based synthesis of gender-specific biological motion. *Dynamic perception*, pages 115–120, 2002.

Koen Van De Merwe, Henk Van Dijk, and Rolf Zon. Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment. *The International Journal of Aviation Psychology*, 22(1) :78–95, 2012.

Christian Vater, Benjamin Wolfe, and Ruth Rosenholtz. Peripheral vision in real-world tasks : A systematic review. *Psychonomic bulletin & review*, 29(5) :1531–1557, 2022.

Mudit Verma, Siddhant Bhambri, and Subbarao Kambhampati. Theory of mind abilities of large language models in human-robot interaction : An illusion? *arXiv preprint arXiv :2401.05302*, 2024.

Cordula Vesper, Laura Schmitz, Lou Safra, Natalie Sebanz, and Günther Knoblich. The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. *Cognition*, 153 :118–123, 2016.

Valeria Villani, Fabio Pini, Francesco Leali, and Cristian Secchi. Survey on human-robot collaboration in industrial settings : Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. *Mechatronics*, 55 :248–266, 2018.

Samantha F Warta, Olivia B Newton, Jihye Song, Andrew Best, and Stephen M Fiore. Effects of social cues on social signals in human-robot interaction during a hallway navigation task. In *Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting*, volume 62, pages 1128–1132. SAGE Publications Sage CA : Los Angeles, CA, 2018.
Paul Watzlawick, Janet Beavin Bavelas, and Don D Jackson. *Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes*. WW Norton & Company, 2011.

Cord Westhoff and Nikolaus F Troje. Kinematic cues for person identification from biological motion. *Perception & psychophysics*, 69(2):241–253, 2007.

Christopher Wickens. Attention: Theory, principles, models and applications. *International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction*, 37(5):403–417, 2021.

Christopher D Wickens. Attention to attention and its applications: A concluding view. *Attention: From theory to practice*, pages 239–249, 2007.

Christopher D Wickens. Situation awareness: Review of mica endsley's 1995 articles on situation awareness theory and measurement. *Human factors*, 50(3):397–403, 2008.

Xu Wu, Chuanyan Feng, Xiaoru Wanyan, Shuang Liu, Lin Ding, Chongchong Miao, Yuhui Wang, and Xueli He. How shared screen affected team collaboration task, a case study of ergonomics experiment on team situation awareness. In *Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: 15th International Conference, EPCE 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings 15*, pages 241–249. Springer, 2018.

Tsuneo Yoshikawa. Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms. In *Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation*, volume 2, pages 1004–1009. IEEE, 1985.

Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norihiro Hagita, and Takanori Miyamoto. Responsive robot gaze to interaction partner. In *Robotics: Science and systems*, pages 37–43. Citeseer, 2006.

Daniele Zavagno, Luca Tommasi, and Bruno Laeng. The eye pupil's response to static and dynamic illusions of luminosity and darkness. *i-Perception*, 8(4):2041669517717754, 2017.

Ting Zhang, Jing Yang, Nade Liang, Brandon J Pitts, Kwaku O Prakah-Asante, Reates Curry, Bradley S Duerstock, Juan P Wachs, and Denny Yu. Physiological measurements of situation awareness: a systematic review. *Human factors*, page 0018720820969071, 2020.
Annexes
# Annexe A

## Questionnaire SART

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="8">Veuillez répondre à chacune des dix questions de 1 (faible) à 7 (fort).</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th><th>4</th><th>5</th><th>6</th><th>7</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Instabilité de la situation:<br>Dans quelle mesure la situation est-elle changeante ?<br>La situation est-elle très instable et susceptible de<br>changer soudainement (fort) ou est-elle très stable et<br>simple (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Complexité de la situation:<br>Quel est le degré de complexité de la situation ? Est-<br>elle complexe et comporte-t-elle de nombreux élé-<br>ments interdépendants (fort) ou est-elle simple et di-<br>recte (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Variabilité de la situation:<br>Combien de variables changent dans la situation ? Y a-<br>t-il un grand nombre de facteurs qui changent (fort) ou<br>y a-t-il peu de variables qui changent (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Vigilance:<br>Quel est votre degré de vigilance dans la situation ?<br>Êtes-vous prêt pour l'activité (fort) ou avez-vous une<br>faible vigilance (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Concentration de l'attention:<br>Dans quelle mesure vous concentrez-vous sur la situa-<br>tion ? Vous concentrez-vous sur plusieurs aspects de la<br>situation (fort) ou sur un seul (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Division de l'attention:<br>Dans quelle mesure votre attention est-elle divisée<br>dans la situation ? Vous concentrez-vous sur de nom-<br>breux aspects de la situation (fort) ou sur un seul<br>(faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Capacité mentale de réserve:<br>Quelle est la capacité mentale dont vous disposez dans<br>cette situation ? En avez-vous suffisamment pour faire<br>face à de nombreuses variables (élevées) ou n'en avez-<br>vous pas du tout (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Quantité d'informations:<br>Quel est le degré d'information que vous avez acquis<br>sur la situation ? Avez-vous reçu et compris beaucoup<br>de connaissances (élevé) ou très peu (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Qualité de l'information:<br>Quelle est la qualité des informations que vous avez<br>obtenues sur la situation ? Les connaissances commu-<br>niquées sont-elles très utiles (élevées) ou insuffisantes<br>(faibles) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr><tr><td>Familiarité avec la situation:<br>Dans quelle mesure connaissez-vous la situation ?<br>Avez-vous une grande expérience en la matière (fort)<br>ou s'agit-il d'une situation nouvelle (faible) ?</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td><td>○</td></tr></tbody></table>
# Annexe B

## Questionnaire NASA-TLX

Veuillez répondre à chacune des six questions de 0 (faible) à 20 (élevée).

<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>0</th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th><th>4</th><th>5</th><th>6</th><th>7</th><th>8</th><th>9</th><th>10</th><th>11</th><th>12</th><th>13</th><th>14</th><th>15</th><th>16</th><th>17</th><th>18</th><th>19</th><th>20</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Exigence Mentale:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quelle a été l'importance de l'activité mentale et intellectuelle requise (ex. réflexion, décision, calcul, mémoire, observation, recherche etc.) ? La tâche vous a-t-elle paru simple, nécessitant peu d'attention (faible) ou complexe, nécessitant beaucoup d'attention (élevée) ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>Exigence Physique:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quelle a été l'importance de l'activité physique requise (ex. pousser, porter, tourner, marcher, activer, etc.) ? La tâche vous a-t-elle paru facile, peu fatigante, calme (faible) ou pénible, fatigante, active (élevée) ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>Exigence Temporelle:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quelle a été l'importance de la pression temporelle causée par la rapidité nécessitée pour l'accomplissement de la tâche ? Était-ce un rythme lent et tranquille (faible) ou rapide et précipité (élevé) ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>Performance:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quelle réussite pensez-vous avoir eu dans l'accomplissement de votre tâche ? Comment pensez-vous avoir atteint les objectifs déterminés par la tâche ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>Effort:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quel degré d'effort avez-vous dû fournir pour exécuter la tâche demandée, (mentalement et physiquement) ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>Frustration:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Pendant l'exécution du travail vous êtes-vous senti satisfait, relaxé, sûr de vous (niveau de frustration faible), ou plutôt découragé, irrité, stressé, sans assurance (niveau de frustration élevé) ?</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td><td>C</td></tr></tbody></table>