# A meteorological dataset of the West African monsoon during the 2016 DACCIWA campaign

Martin Kohler, Geoffrey Bessardon, Barbara Brooks, Norbert Kalthoff, Fabienne Lohou, Bianca Adler, Oluwagbemiga Olawale Jegede, Barbara Altstädter, Leonard Kofitse Amekudzi, Jeffrey Nii Armah Aryee, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

► To cite this version:

Martin Kohler, Geoffrey Bessardon, Barbara Brooks, Norbert Kalthoff, Fabienne Lohou, et al. A meteorological dataset of the West African monsoon during the 2016 DACCIWA campaign. Scientific Data, 2022, 9 (1), pp.174. 10.1038/s41597-022-01277-7. hal-03668887

HAL Id: hal-03668887

https://hal.science/hal-03668887

Submitted on 2 Jun 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
scientific **data**

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

DATA DESCRIPTOR

OPEN

# A meteorological dataset of the West African monsoon during the 2016 DACCIWA campaign

Martin Kohler<fnref n="1" />✉, Geoffrey Bessardon ID², Barbara Brooks³, Norbert Kalthoff<fnref n="1" />, Fabienne Lohou⁴, Bianca Adler ID<fnref n="1" />,¹¹,¹², Oluwagbemiga Olawale Jegede⁵, Barbara Altstädter⁶, Leonard Kofitse Amekudzi⁷, Jeffrey Nii Armah Aryee⁷, Winifred Ayinpogbilla Atiah⁷, Muritala Ayoola⁵, Karmen Babić<fnref n="1" />, Konrad Bärfuss ID⁶, Yannick Bezombes⁴, Guillaume Bret⁴, Pierre-Etienne Brilouet⁴,¹³, Fred Cayle-Aethelhard⁷, Sylvester Danuor⁷, Claire Delon ID⁴, Solene Derrien ID⁴, Cheikh Dione⁴,¹⁴, Pierre Durand⁴, Kwabena Fosu-Amankwah ID⁷,¹⁵, Omar Gabella⁴,¹⁶, James Groves², Jan Handwerker<fnref n="1" />, Corinne Jambert⁴, Norbert Kunka⁸, Astrid Lampert ID⁶, Jérémy Leclercq⁴,¹⁷, Marie Lothon⁴, Patrice Medina⁴, Arnaud Miere¹⁰, Falk Pätzold ID⁶, Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia ID⁹, Irene Reinares Martínez⁴,¹⁸, Steven Sharpe², Victoria Smith² & Andreas Wieser<fnref n="1" />

As part of the Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa (DACCIWA) project, extensive in-situ measurements of the southern West African atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) have been performed at three supersites Kumasi (Ghana), Savè (Benin) and Ile-Ife (Nigeria) during the 2016 monsoon period (June and July). The measurements were designed to provide data for advancing our understanding of the relevant processes governing the formation, persistence and dissolution of nocturnal low-level stratus clouds and their influence on the daytime ABL in southern West Africa. An extensive low-level cloud deck often forms during the night and persists long into the following day strongly influencing the ABL diurnal cycle. Although the clouds are of a high significance for the regional climate, the dearth of observations in this region has hindered process understanding. Here, an overview of the measurements ranging from near-surface observations, cloud characteristics, aerosol and precipitation to the dynamics and thermodynamics in the ABL and above, and data processing is given. So-far achieved scientific findings, based on the dataset analyses, are briefly overviewed.

<footnote n="1">¹Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
²School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
³National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Leeds, United Kingdom.
⁴Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
⁵Department of Physics & Engineering Physics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
⁶Institute of Flight Guidance, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
⁷Department of Physics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
⁸Institute for Data Processing and Electronics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
⁹Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
¹⁰Sedoo, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, IRD, Toulouse, France.
¹¹Present address: CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
¹²Present address: NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
¹³Present address: Centre National de Recherche en Météorologie, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France.
¹⁴Present address: African Centre of Meteorological Applications for Development, Niamey, Niger.
¹⁵Present address: C.K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Ghana.
¹⁶Present address: Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier (LUPM), Université de Montpellier, CNRS/IN2P3, Montpellier, France.
¹⁷Present address: Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France.
¹⁸Present address: Laboratoire de l'Atmosphère et des Cyclones, UMR8105, CNRS, Université de La Réunion, Météo-France, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France.
✉e-mail: martin.kohler@kit.edu</footnote>
## Background & Summary

Before DACCIWA, the skill of numerical weather and global climate models concerning the forecast of clouds and precipitation was overall low at the immediate Guinea Coast and southern West Africa during the summer monsoon¹,², possibly due to representation problems of the so-called Gulf of Guinea maritime inflow phenomenon³,⁴. Low clouds tended to be underestimated in many of these models, leading to too much solar incoming radiation at the Earth's surface⁴. The small number of observational investigations available showed that during the monsoon season, nights are characterised by the frequent formation of nocturnal low-level stratus clouds (LLSCs), with typical cloud-base heights of a few hundred metres above ground. They can last the whole morning before being eroded by daytime ABL mixing⁵,⁶. According to a satellite-based study⁷, their extent covers an area of around 800 000 km² and, thus, exerts a considerable effect on the regional climate. However, the understanding of the mechanisms and processes driving the West African atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) clouds diurnal cycle has been hindered by the dearth of high-quality observations. Only a few model studies were performed to investigate the mechanisms for cloud formation, persistence and dissolution⁸,⁹. Therefore, a more realistic representation of clouds and convection in southern West Africa in weather forecast and regional climate models was aimed at.

A number of processes expected to be relevant for the formation of LLSCs in this region have been listed by Adler et al.⁹ and Kalthoff et al.¹⁰ including large-scale advection, orographic lifting, lifting related to gravity waves, latent heat release, and vertical mixing of moisture due to shear-generated turbulence below the nocturnal low-level jet (LLJ). With respect to the latter process, shear-induced turbulence in the upper part of the LLJ and in the lower part of the African Easterly Jet (AEJ) could, depending on the position of the AEJ, mix the wet monsoon flow and the dry Saharan air layer above. Prior to DACCIWA it was not clear to what extent the nocturnal LLSC formation, their morning dissolution and the growth of the cloud-topped daytime ABL on the following day depend on free tropospheric moisture content and middle and upper-level clouds¹⁰,¹¹. Aerosols emitted from the main metropolitan areas on the Gulf of Guinea coastline (Abidjan, Accra and, Lagos) and advected by the south-westerly monsoon flow also influence LLSC macro-physical characteristics in southern West Africa by affecting cloud microphysical properties such as cloud droplet and ice crystal formation and size-distribution³,¹². The relevance of the different processes and their spatial variation were neither fully understood nor verified by observations, thus the need for further observation and analysis.

The overall goal of the Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa (DACCIWA) project (European Union Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 603502) was to significantly improve monitoring capacities and the scientific understanding of key interactions between surface-based emissions, atmospheric dynamics and chemistry, clouds, aerosols, and the climate of West Africa and to implement these findings into the next generation of weather and climate models³. Therefore, from mid-June to end of July 2016, as part of DACCIWA, an extensive measurement/observational campaign was conducted in the region: one of the objectives being to obtain high-quality observations that would allow the identification of the relevant processes impacting the formation of LLSC and the ABL diurnal cycle. The ground-based measurement strategy was designed such that the relevant processes expected to be involved in LLSC formation were recorded. To achieve this, measurements at three supersites: Kumasi (Ghana), Savè (Benin), and Ile-Ife (Nigeria) (Fig. 1) were complemented by additional radiosoundings from existing national and reactivated African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) networks¹³ and flights with three research aircraft¹⁴. A detailed description of the field activities during summer 2016 is given by Flamant et al.¹⁴ overview the synoptic conditions that prevailed during the period of the DACCIWA campaign and Kalthoff et al.¹⁰ describe the meteorological conditions at the three ground-based supersites and the characteristics of the LLSC with associated features. This paper provides a detailed description of the measurements at the ground-based supersites and the available data and demonstrates that the collected dataset allowed identifying and describing the relevant processes for the LLSC formation and the development of the ABL diurnal cycle.

## Methods

**Experimental design, measurement strategy and data acquisition.** The DACCIWA ground-based measurement campaign lasted from 14 June to 30 July 2016 and encompassed the three weeks of the airborne campaign (27 June to 16 July 2016), during which three European aircraft conducted research flights across Ivory Coast, Ghana, Togo and Benin¹⁴. During the ground-based campaign, a comprehensive set of instruments was deployed at the three DACCIWA supersites (Fig. 1), namely near the cities of Kumasi, Savè, and Ile-Ife, in zones where the formation of LLSC has been identified as frequent⁸. The clouds develop between the Guinean coast and 10° N. So, the three sites at around 8° N filled up the sparse radiosonde monitoring network between the West African coast and the inland and lay on the South-North transects from Lomé–Savè and Lomé–Accra–Kumasi of the research aircraft flight patterns¹⁴. Furthermore, three sites at nearly the same latitude allowed to monitor the cloud-layer homogeneity for similar large-scale forcing associated to the maritime inflow phenomenon. The equipment was distributed to allow providing the main spatiotemporal characteristics of the LLSC (e.g., onset, duration, dissolution, cloud base height, sub-cloud conditions). The three stations are characterised by more (Kumasi, Ile-Ife) or less (Savè) hilly terrain with hills not higher than 300 m above station height. At each supersite, in situ and remote sensing observations of (i) near-surface meteorological parameters, soil temperature, soil moisture and chemicals, (ii) dynamics and thermodynamics in the ABL and above, (iii) cloud characteristics, aerosol and precipitation, and, (iv) surface energy balance components were performed (Supplementary Tables 1–4).

During the ground-based campaign, all instruments worked continuously, except the remotely piloted aeroplane systems (RPASs), radio- and tethered sondes. Daily radiosondes were released in Kumasi at 0600 UTC, while in Savè the sondes were launched at 0500 UTC in order to be synchronous with the launchings at operational radiosonde stations.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Location of the DACCIWA investigation area (red box) in West Africa and positions of the three supersites Kumasi in Ghana, Savè in Benin, and Ile-Ife in Nigeria (black diamonds). Zoomed-in orography in the 100 km per 100 km centred on the three supersites Kumasi, Savè, and Ile-Ife (lower panels). Thin solid lines indicate country borders with country names (adapted from Kalthoff *et al.*¹⁰).</figcaption></figure>

Daily online meetings between the three super sites were held to discuss the execution of an intensive observation period (IOP). Prerequisite for an IOP was the absence of mesoscale convective systems and favourable conditions for LLSC evolution in the investigation area. The weather prediction was based on numerical forecast models and decision for an IOP was made in coordination with the DACCIWA Operations Center (DOC; http://dacciwa.sedoo.fr/) located in Lomé, Togo¹⁴ during the period of the airborne campaign.

During IOPs, additional measurements consisting of intensified radiosonde releases and flights from RPASs were performed. In total, 15 IOPs were conducted during the ground-based campaign: 7 of them during the aircraft campaign (Table 1). The IOPs (the day of the IOP is denoted as day D) ran for a 24-hour period commencing in the late afternoon on day D minus one (D-1). The launching times of the sondes were selected to sufficiently resolve the temporal development and spatial distribution of the LLSCs¹⁰. A detailed overview of the radiosonde and RPAS schedule for the three supersites is given in Fig. 2 and information on the instrumentation are available in Supplementary Table 1. The schedules for the three supersites look like:

* At Ile-Ife, tethered radiosondes (TRS) reaching heights of up to 900 m above ground level (AGL) were launched during IOPs, typically between 1800 UTC on day D-1 and 1800 UTC on day D. Intervals were approximately 3-hourly or 6-hourly, depending on availability of helium for the balloon platform and the operational condition of the electric winch. IOPs 3, 5, and 12 were only partially completed due to technical issues (shortage of helium).

* At Kumasi, there were 4 normal radiosondes (NRS, i.e. reaching up to the tropopause) with 6-hour intervals, the first one was launched at 1800 UTC on D-1 and the last one at 1200 UTC on D. In addition, frequent radiosondes (FRS) were launched up to an altitude of 650 m AGL at 0300 UTC, 0600 UTC and 0900 UTC. At 0600 UTC, 2 FRS were launched simultaneously with NRS to evaluate the performances of the FRS¹⁶. An excess of radiosondes led to the decision to increase the number of NRS toward the end of the campaign. For IOP 10 to 15, technical issues in the FRS ground station reduced the number of FRS.

* At Savè, there were 5 NRSs with 6-hour intervals, the first one was released at 1700 UTC on D-1 and the last one at 1700 UTC on D. Due to lack of radiosondes, the 1700 UTC radiosoundings on D were cancelled at Savè in the course of the campaign (after IOP 7). FRS up to an altitude of around 1500 m AGL were launched in between the NRSs. During IOPs 1–6, FRS were launched hourly between 2100 UTC on D-1 and 1000 UTC
<table><caption>Table 1. IOP dates in 2016.</caption><thead><tr><th>IOP #</th><th>Date</th><th>Aircraft flights</th><th>IOP #</th><th>Date</th><th>Aircraft flights</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">1</td><td>17/06</td><td rowspan="2">No</td><td rowspan="2">9</td><td>10/07</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>18/06</td><td>11/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">2</td><td>20/06</td><td rowspan="2">No</td><td rowspan="2">10</td><td>13/07</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td></tr><tr><td>21/06</td><td>14/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">3</td><td>25/06</td><td rowspan="2">No</td><td rowspan="2">11</td><td>16/07</td><td rowspan="2">No</td></tr><tr><td>26/06</td><td>17/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">4</td><td>28/06</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td><td rowspan="2">12</td><td>20/07</td><td rowspan="2">No</td></tr><tr><td>29/06</td><td>21/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">5</td><td>30/06</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td><td rowspan="2">13</td><td>23/07</td><td rowspan="2">No</td></tr><tr><td>01/07</td><td>24/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">6</td><td>02/07</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td><td rowspan="2">14</td><td>26/07</td><td rowspan="2">No</td></tr><tr><td>03/07</td><td>27/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">7</td><td>04/07</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td><td rowspan="2">15</td><td>29/07</td><td rowspan="2">No</td></tr><tr><td>05/07</td><td>30/07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">8</td><td>07/07</td><td rowspan="2">Yes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>08/07</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

on D. Starting at IOP 7, FRS were launched in 90-minute intervals between 1830 UTC on D-1 and 0930 UTC on D in order to better capture the evening transition phase. RPAS OVLI-TA performed profile flights in the afternoon during periods when no FRS was launched. RPAS ALADINA performed flight pattern consisting of vertical profiles and horizontal legs during periods when stratus was present in the morning, when stratus was breaking and in the evening during the transition to stable conditions.

**Near-surface measurements.** In Ile-Ife, an energy balance station was set up over a closely-cropped grass surface at the measurement site. The configuration of the used eddy-covariance (EC) system¹⁷ comprised of a sonic anemometer and a Lambda Instruments Corporation (LI-COR) infrared gas analyser both installed on a 2.1 m mast. Co-located with the EC system was a four-component net radiometer placed on a 1.7 m radiation stand and a soil-heat flux plate buried at a depth of −0.02 m and a soil moisture probe at −0.05 m. A 15 m tower positioned nearby provided every 10 s multi-level measurements of wind speed at 5 selected heights (1.14, 1.88, 3.3, 6.3 and 12.1 m AGL), arranged in a log-linear fashion. With the exception of the 1.88 m AGL level, measurements of air temperature and relative humidity were provided with all the tower data averaged every minute. The EC system sampled every 0.1 s to produce the turbulent temperature, moisture and wind components. The integrated datasets were further reduced to 30-min averages to determine sensible and latent heat fluxes, among other meteorological parameters.

In Kumasi, the energy balance parameters were measured with a LI-COR gas analyser co-located at 3.5 m AGL with a sonic anemometer sampling respectively CO₂ concentrations, wind speed and direction and sonic temperature every 0.05 s and stored as 60 s average in the dataset. Before averaging, the CO₂ concentration, wind speed and direction have been used to provide an estimation of the turbulent fluxes every 30 min. A radiation sensor at 1.68 m AGL was sampling shortwave and longwave radiation every 5 s. Additionally, 6 soil moisture, soil temperature and soil heat flux probes, buried at a depth of −0.08 m, sampled soil heat flux, soil temperature and soil water potential every 5 min. In addition to the energy balance tower, an automatic weather station has been set up at 2 m AGL measuring air temperature, relative humidity, pressure, wind speed, wind direction, and precipitation with one-minute resolution.

In Savè, two towers were deployed on two different vegetation covers. The first one was deployed over a mix of grass and bushes¹⁰, with the instrumentation from the observation system KITcube¹⁸. This tower was equipped with sensors sampling every 1 s air temperature, relative humidity (2 m AGL), air pressure (1.5 m AGL), surface temperature and soil heat flux (−0.05 m). Longwave and shortwave radiation was measured with the same sampling rate at 3 m AGL. Data from this tower have been aggregated every minute and every ten minutes. Soil temperature and soil moisture (−0.05, −0.10, −0.30, −0.50 m) were measured every 10 min. In addition, a sonic anemometer deployed at 4 m AGL was sampling wind direction, wind speed and sonic temperature every 0.05 s and a LI-COR gas analyser sampled humidity with the same sampling rate. EC method has been used to calculate 30-min turbulent fluxes¹⁹. The second tower, deployed over a mixed corn field provided the surface energy balance terms and additional chemistry measurements through chemicals probe measuring respectively O₃, NO, NO₂, NH₃, and CO every 10 s. O₃, NO, and NO₂ probes were deployed at 8.1 m AGL, CO probes at 5 m AGL and NO and NH₃ probes have been deployed at 0.2 m AGL. A weather station (7.7 m AGL) recorded every 60 s precipitation and every 0.1 s air temperature, relative humidity and air pressure. The data from this device have been then aggregated over 60 s. Every 0.1 s water content (average between −0.01 and −0.31 m), soil temperature (average between −0.065 and −0.0165 m) and soil heat flux (−0.05 m) were recorded and then aggregated over 60 s. Precipitation (1.3 m AGL), incoming and outgoing long and shortwave radiations
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Timetable of complementary measurement during IOPs at the three super sites. IOPs with research aircraft flights are indicated in red.</figcaption></figure>

(7.16 m AGL) were sampled every 60 s. In addition, a sonic anemometer and a LI-COR gas analyser sampled the three wind components, the sonic temperature, the air humidity and the CO₂ concentration every 0.1 s in order to estimate 30-min turbulent fluxes. Furthermore, biogenic soil fluxes of NO and NH₃ were measured at the Savè site with the use of a chemiluminescence analyser, and the closed dynamic chamber technique²⁰. Fluxes are given as daily averaged fluxes, calculated from 8 to 25 fluxes measured each day.

**Measurements of dynamics and thermodynamics in the boundary layer and above.** *Dynamical parameters.* At all three sites, sodars (SOnic Detection and Ranging) were deployed to measure horizontal wind profiles with a vertical resolution of 20 m in Ile-Ife, 10 m at Kumasi and Savè, in the lowest 510 m AGL in Ile-Ife, 1000 m AGL in Kumasi, 600 m AGL in Savè and averaged at a temporal resolution of 10 min at Ile-Ife and Kumasi and 30 min at Savè.

In Savè, two wind lidars¹⁸ were deployed: the wind lidar Windcube was operated in vertical stare mode to provide vertical wind speed profiles with around 6 s temporal and 20 m vertical resolution from 40 to 600 m AGL. The wind lidar Windtracer performed a scan pattern, which combined vertical stare mode with range-height indicator (RHI) and plan-position indicator (PPI) scans. Every 30 min, two PPI scans at 15° and 75° elevation angles and four RHI scans (two along and two across the mean wind direction) were conducted taking about 5 min in total. The remaining 25 min, the lidar was looking vertically. During vertical stare mode, vertical wind speed profiles were obtained from around 400 to 5000 m AGL, thus extending the range of the Windcube, with 1 s temporal and 40 m spatial resolution. From RHI and PPI scans, the horizontal wind speed profiles were derived by the velocity–azimuth display (VAD) method and information on the spatial structure of the radial wind field between 400 and 9000 m distance, with 75 m spatial resolution along the laser beam, was obtained. Additionally, an ultra-high-frequency (UHF) wind profiler²¹ was deployed in Savè to measure horizontal wind profiles every 2 min. It was used in two modes²²: a low acquisition mode covering the lowest part of the atmosphere (0–3500 m AGL) with a vertical resolution of 75 m to get a detailed profile of the horizontal wind in the boundary layer; a high acquisition mode covering a larger part of the atmosphere (0–4000 m AGL) with a vertical resolution of 150 m to obtain more information about the general horizontal wind profile.

*Thermodynamic parameters.* At Kumasi and Savè, microwave radiometers²³ were installed providing integrated water vapor (IWV), liquid water path (LWP) as well as temperature and humidity profiles. While the radiometer at Kumasi performed a combination of vertical stare mode and boundary layer scans, the radiometer at Savè was able to perform additional (PPI) scans providing information on the spatial distribution of IWV and LWP every 30 min.
*In situ measured dynamical and thermodynamic parameters.* In Ile-Ife, TRS reaching heights of up to 900 m AGL were providing temperature and relative humidity profiles. In Kumasi and Savè, a combination of NRS reaching heights up to 20 km AGL, and FRS reaching heights to 650 m and 1500 m AGL, in the respective sites, provided temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction profiles.

Two RPASs have been flying over Savè. The RPAS OVLI-TA is a 3 kg airplane equipped with a 5-hole probe (in ongoing development) and temperature, humidity and pressure sensors. Only slow measurements were validated at the time of the campaign. OVLI-TA was flying vertical profiles most of the time below 600 m AGL in spirals of about 100 m radius. It reached 1000 m AGL maximum. A total of 20 flights were performed, each one with about 20 min duration. The RPAS ALADINA²⁴,²⁵ was operated for a total flight duration of 53 h at the local airfield in Savè, 4 km north-east of the supersite. The payload consists of meteorological sensors with a fast temporal resolution for measuring turbulent parameters and a micro aethalometer in order to observe black carbon mass concentrations. Vertical profiles were performed up to the maximum possible height of 1500 m AGL, i.e. below cloud base. In addition, horizontal flights were operated for studying turbulent fluxes at small-scale along 2 km long horizontal paths perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction.

**Cloud characteristics, aerosol and precipitation.** At Ile-Ife and Savè, sun photometers²⁶ recorded aerosol optical depths (AOD). While the sun photometer in Ile-Ife was hand-held to measure daily AOD values, the automatic sun photometer in Savè provided 30 min AOD values and precipitable water. Infrared radiometers were providing information on the cloud base temperature: at Ile-Ife, a hand-held infrared radiometer was operated every 3 hours measuring cloud-base temperature, at Savè 2 infrared radiometers as part of the microwave radiometer continuously measured brightness temperature at two frequencies, which represents cloud-base temperature in the presence of clouds.

At Kumasi and Savè, micro rain radars (MRRs²⁷) were measuring rain rate, liquid water content and drop size distribution every 60 s. The vertical coverage at Kumasi was up to 1085 m AGL at range intervals of 35 m, and up to 6000 m AGL at range intervals of 200 m at Savè. Ceilometers recorded backscatter every 10 s up to 10 000 m AGL at range intervals of 5 m at Kumasi, while in Savè the vertical coverage is up to 15 000 m AGL at range intervals of 15 m and the temporal resolution in the file is 60 s.

Cameras have been deployed at 2 m AGL at Kumasi and 7.4 m AGL at Savè, to capture visible (daytime) and infrared (night-time) image of the sky every second in Kumasi and every 2 minutes in Savè.

In Savè, a cloud radar¹⁸ was operated combining vertical stare mode and RHI scans. In vertical stare mode, it provided radial velocity and reflectivity profiles from 150 m AGL to 15000 m AGL (depending on the backscatter concentration) at a vertical resolution of 30 m and a temporal resolution of 10 s. Every 30 minutes, two RHI scans in the prevailing wind direction and two RHI scans perpendicular to this direction were performed at 45° elevation angle. The X-band rain radar performed a volume scan every 5 minutes using 11 elevation angles between 0.7° and 60° followed by a vertical stare scan to record reflectivity, radial velocity, differential reflectivity, specific differential phase, and further parameters of the precipitation distribution at a maximum range of 100 km. A Joss-Waldvogel distrometer²⁸ measured near-surface drop size distribution every 60 s.

## Data Records

The present dataset with associated metadata is available on the Base Afrique de l'Ouest Beyond AMMA Base (BAOBAB) database http://baobab.sedoo.fr/DACCIWA/ where it is organised by country (Benin, Ghana, Nigeria), instrument and measured parameter. In total, 70 data records were generated and 7 DOIs have been created. All the data recorded in Ile-Ife can be found in Oluwagbeniga et al.²⁹ and in Kumasi in Brooks et al.³⁰. The data recorded at Savè site are structured as follows: all the data recorded by UPS are stored in Derrien et al.²⁰. The data sets from KIT include near-surface measurements³¹, cloud and precipitation measurements³² and thermodynamic data from surface-based remote sensing³³. The meteorological and black carbon data measured with the unmanned research aircraft ALADINA of the TU Braunschweig are available in Bärfuss et al.³⁴.

The data formatting strategy has been designed with the aim to make direct comparisons between sites. All data recorded except the cloud cameras at Kumasi and Savè are available in NetCDF format, Savè X-band radar data are additionally packed as tar.gz. The cloud camera in Kumasi provides images in AVI format, the images in Savè are stored in JPG format and are archived as tar.gz. Similar aggregation times have been used for fluxes estimates. The supplementary tables are splitting the dataset into 3 subjects i.e., measurements of dynamics and thermodynamics in the boundary layer and above (Supplementary Table 1), measurements of cloud characteristics, aerosol and precipitation (Supplementary Table 2), near surface measurements (Supplementary Table 3), and energy balance measurements (Supplementary Table 4).

## Technical Validation

Before and during the campaign, it was necessary to calibrate the individual sensors and measurement systems and to perform other quality controls to ensure the data quality of the DACCIWA data sets. Consequently, the standard meteorological sensors (e.g. temperature, humidity, air pressure, wind speed) were calibrated prior to the campaign. For example, for temperature and humidity this was done either in certified facilities (climate chambers) or at the manufacturer's premises. Anemometers were calibrated in certified wind tunnels or have been calibrated by the manufacturer. The equipment from the energy balance stations, like radiation instrumentation, was subject to regular calibrations by the manufacturers. The trace gas analysers operated at Savè supersite were calibrated regularly with reference gases. This procedure is described in detail by Pacifico et al.³⁵. Concerning the radiosoundings, we relied on the manufacturer's calibrated sondes (in warranty) (Kumasi, Ile-Ife) or even performed ground calibrations prior to releases of the sondes (Savè). The RPAS OVLI-TA and
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Data availability of the different measurement systems at the three supersites on the individual days. Green: data complete, orange: data partly available, red: data missing. The IOPs (day D) are indicated in yellow.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** Data quality control in DACCIWA experiment preparation, data collection, processing, archiving and sharing.</figcaption></figure>

ALADINA used manufacturer calibrated sensors and ALADINA additionally calibrated the system's sensor according to Bärfuss et al.³⁶ Concerning remote sensing systems: The microwave radiometers were calibrated on site with liquid nitrogen (according to the calibration instructions of the manufacturers). Standard retrievals from the manufacturer were used (Kumasi) or the retrievals were trained on about 13000 soundings from Abidjan (Savè). The sun photometers in use were either calibrated by the manufacturer (Ile-Ife) or in accordance with the AERONET procedures²⁶ prior to the campaign (Savè). All other remote sensing systems like wind lidars, cloud and rain radars, wind profiler and sodars were undergone regular maintenance procedures by the manufacturer before shipping them to the campaign in West Africa.

As most of the meteorological parameters were measured simultaneously by different sensors, this redundancy allows cross-checking of the observations. By constant monitoring and regular maintenance of the instruments we tried to keep the loss of data low and the data quality high. Maintenance of the instruments and sensor failures (instrument, time, action taken) were protocoled in logbooks. Figure 3 shows an overview of the data availability after quality control. An overview of the whole series of quality control measures that were undertaken and which were implemented are summarised accordingly (Fig. 4):
(1) Experiment preparation period: Observation sites, observation instrumentation and operating specifications were formulated and instruments were selected according to the operating specifications and scientific aims. To ensure the accuracy of the observation, instruments calibrations were performed before sending the instruments to the sites, then during the deployment instruments were aligned. To ensure the consistency of observations, an observer training was formed.

(2) Experiment: a daily maintenance routine consisting of technical inspections, instrumentation cleaning, software maintenance, instrument self-calibration (when available) and data back-up has been set up and an experimental logbook filled. This routine ensures that instrument alignment and calibration is maintained through the campaign as well as any anomalies or exceptional events recorded and any accidental loss of data prevented. Data collection and quick looks were performed to check the quality and the integrity of the data through the campaign (http://dacciwa.sedoo.fr).

(3) After the experiment: each institution applied their own post-processing method to the instrumentation that belongs to them and agreements between institutions were made on the file format and some derived parameter products. Quality-controlled data including meta data were published on the BAOBAB repository.

(4) Use of data: user feedback was considered and the technical and scientific quality of the dataset was proved in numerous scientific publications which successfully investigated the processes relevant for the diurnal cycle of the ABL and the nocturnal LLSC evolution.

Kalthoff et al.¹⁰ show that extended LLSCs form frequently during the night-time and persist into the following day in the investigation area in June and July, while their characteristics (formation and dissolution time, cloud base height) vary considerably from day to day. These results apply for individual supersites and also between them. Dione et al.³⁷ analysed the occurrence and characteristics of the monsoon flow, the LLJ and the maritime inflow at Savè supersite. They found that the maritime inflow and the LLJ are regularly present in the area, arriving e.g. at Savè between 1800 and 1900 UTC. Differential horizontal cold air advection, associated with the maritime inflow, and LLJ-generated turbulence cause the erosion of the stable nocturnal surface inversion. The associated cooling in the nocturnal ABL is crucial to reach saturation³⁸. Quantification of the heat budget terms show that on average 50% of the cooling prior to the LLSC formation is due to horizontal cold air advection, 20% by radiative flux divergence and about 22% by sensible heat flux divergence in the presence of the LLJ. Detailed heat budget analysis of an individual night shows that the horizontal cold-air advection could even contribute up to 70% to cooling³⁹. Advection of specific humidity by the maritime inflow is of minor relevance for the formation of LLSCs. The comparison of nights with and without LLSCs reveals that three major mechanisms are crucial whether LLSCs form or not: the onset time and strength of the LLJ, the horizontal cold air advection and the background moisture level⁴⁰.

The individual studies allowed Lohou et al.⁴¹ to develop a conceptual model of the diurnal cycle of the LLSCs in southern West Africa. The cycle can be divided into four main phases: during the first two phases, denoted as the stable and the jet phase, the relative humidity increases until the air is saturated and the LLSCs form. The humidity increase is due to cooling of the air, mainly caused by horizontal cold air advection (50%). The remaining half is mainly due to divergence of net radiation and sensible heat flux. The third phase is the stratus phase, which starts when the LCCs have formed in the night and lasts until the onset of surface-buoyancy-driven turbulence on the following day. During the stratus phase, a mixing of the sub-cloud layer by shear-driven turbulence below the nocturnal LLJ core and the radiative cooling at the LLSC top influence the height of the cloud base and the coupling of the cloud to the Earth's surface⁴². The fourth phase (convection phase) comprises the breakup of the LLSC due to convection. The breakup time, which depends partially on LLSC-surface coupling, has a considerable impact on the energy balance of the surface and, consequently, on the convective ABL depth, which was found to vary by a factor of 2 from day-to-day⁴¹,⁴². The observational data were also used to initialise large eddy simulations (LES) to perform sensitivity experiments investigating the impact of different processes (radiation, entrainment, turbulent fluxes and subsidence) on the diurnal stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition in the morning⁴³. It turns out that the radiation term, which is the main source term of LLSCs liquid water content (LWC) during the night, decreases progressively during the day with the increase of solar radiation. After sunrise, the entrainment, enhanced by the rising of the cloud deck, is the leading factor for the decrease of LWC. The stronger the wind shear the stronger the role of the entrainment term. This result makes sense when considering the wind shear above the nocturnal LLJ core.

Beside the investigation of the processes governing the diurnal cycle of the LLSCs, the data from the supersites were used for additional studies. Haslett et al.⁴⁴ used the radiosoundings to understand high aerosol optical depth values present across the region. They found evidence that these are driven by the high moisture level and are then moderated by changes in aerosol abundance. Altstädter et al.⁴⁵ could show that the observed black carbon layer measured at the Savè super site was transported from the south with maritime inflow and was mixed vertically downwards when the nocturnal LLJ has formed. Performing high-resolution chemistry-transport modelling in combination with the surface and radiosonde data, Deroubaix et al.⁴⁶ could characterise the relative contributions of different sources (i.e., emissions from several large coastal cities) to the air quality at Savè super site. Deetz et al.⁴⁷ used the observations from the Savè and Kumasi super sites in their model simulations to investigate the aerosol radiative effects and their impact on clouds and atmospheric dynamics. The soil fluxes of nitric oxide (NO) and ammonia (NH₃) observed over four different land cover types at Savè were successfully used for a model comparison with the Goddard Earth Observing System Chemistry Model (GEOS-Chem)³⁵. Reinares Martines et al.⁴⁸ analysed a warm-rain episode over southern West Africa using X-band radar measurements from Savè in combination with LES. The radiosoundings at Kumasi supersite were also applied to assess the quality of a newly developed reusable radiosonde systems¹⁶.
The numerous studies highlight that the datasets collected at the three supersites allowed to successfully solve several of DACCIWA questions and is a valuable addition to already available datasets like those from the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA)⁴⁹,⁵⁰ project and the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL)⁵¹,⁵² project. Further exploitation of the data e.g. could use the wealth and quality of surface energy balance, in-situ and remote sensing profiling data to investigate the mean and turbulence characteristics of the cloud-topped convective boundary layer. Up to now, detailed studies are mainly based on Savè measurements. Even if the Kumasi and Ile-Ife sites were less instrumented, some of the cloud cycle characteristics at these two sites could be analysed and compared to the results obtained for Savè. This would provide a broader view on the ABL clouds. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of convective precipitation in dependence on convective instability could be investigated using rain radar observation.

## Code availability

Here, the most important information about the used software is given. More information is included in the Supplementary Tables 1 to 4.

For Ile-Ife supersite, the proprietary software EasyFlux DL v. 2.3 provided by Campbell Scientific for acquisition and analysis of the turbulent fluxes data is used (https://www.campbellsci.com/easyflux-dl). This software is written and supplied along with CSAT3/LI-7500 system.

For Kumasi supersite, all codes produced to quality control and produce the data are stored under https://github.com/barbarabrooks/DACCIWA-Matlab. For example, the Matlab programme calculating the turbulent fluxes is stored under DACCIWA-Matlab/FL1/NC/NC flux estimates/write NC_variables_FLUX_EST_v2.m. The other codes concern the automatic weather stations, Ceilometer, MRR, radiometer, rapid sondes, sodar, and radiosondes.

At the Savè supersite, the turbulent fluxes of the KIT energy balance station were calculated with the TK3.11 software¹⁹,⁵³ available under https://zenodo.org/record/20349. For the UPS energy balance station, the turbulent fluxes have been estimated with the EC method EddyPro® Software (Version 6.2.0) from LI-COR Environmental, available under https://www.licor.com/env/support/EddyPro/topics/whats-new.html. The vertical profiles of the wind deduced from the UHF wind profiler were calculated with a software developed in Laboratoire d'Aéronomie⁵⁴. This software has been used to process many previous campaign datasets²¹,²²,⁵⁴⁻⁵⁶.

The atmospheric quantities of the microwave radiometer at Savè were obtained with a retrieval algorithm provided by the University of Cologne²³,⁵⁷⁻⁵⁹ available under ftp://gop.meteo.uni-koeln.de/pub/loehnert/mwr_data_flow/. The algorithm was trained on about 13000 radiosonde profiles measured at Abidjan, Ivory Coast, between 1980 and 2014. The cloud base height from ceilometer backscatter was retrieved applying the manufacturer's algorithm (Manual - Lufft - CHM 15k. https://www.lufft.com/products/cloud-height-snow-depth-sensors-288/ceilometer-chm-15k-nimbus-2300/, 2017). Cloud radar uses IDL software provided by Metek⁶⁰.

Received: 15 December 2021; Accepted: 21 February 2022;

Published online: 14 April 2022

## References

1. Hannak, L., Knippertz, P., Fink, A. H., Kniffka, A. & Pante, G. Why do global climate models struggle to represent low-level clouds in the West African summer monsoon? *J. Clim.* **30**, 1665–1687, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0451.1 (2017).

2. Couvreux, F. et al. Modelling of the thermodynamical diurnal cycle in the lower atmosphere: a joint evaluation of four contrasted regimes in the tropics over land. *Boundary-Layer Meteorol.* **150**, 185–214, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9862-6 (2014).

3. Knippertz, P. et al. The DACCIWA project: Dynamics-aerosol chemistry-cloud interactions in West Africa. *Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.* **96**, 1451–1460, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00108.1 (2015).

4. Knippertz, P. et al. Key lessons from the DACCIWA project for operational meteorological services. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3957318 (2020).

5. Schrage, J. M., Augustyn, S. & Fink, A. H. Nocturnal stratiform cloudiness during the West African monsoon. *Meteorol. Atmos. Phys.* **95**, 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-006-0194-7 (2007).

6. Knippertz, P. et al. Ultra-low clouds over the southern West African monsoon region. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **38**, L21808, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049278 (2011).

7. van der Linden, R., Fink, A. H. & Redl, R. Satellite-based climatology of low-level continental clouds in southern West Africa during the summer monsoon season. *J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.* **120**, 1186–1201, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022614 (2015).

8. Schuster, R., Fink, A. H. & Knippertz, P. Formation and maintenance of nocturnal low-level stratus over the southern West African monsoon region during AMMA 2006. *J. Atmos. Sci.* **70**, 2337–2355, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0241.1 (2013).

9. Adler, B., Kalthoff, N. & Gantner, L. Nocturnal low-level clouds over southern West Africa analysed using high-resolution simulations. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **17**, 899–910, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-899-2017 (2017).

10. Kalthoff, N. et al. An overview of the diurnal cycle of the atmospheric boundary layer during the West African monsoon season: Results from the 2016 observational campaign. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **18**, 2913–2928, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2913-2018 (2018).

11. Leung, W. Y. H. et al. Sensitivity of a continental night-time stratocumulus-topped boundary layer to varying environmental conditions. *Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.* **142**, 2911–2924, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2877 (2016).

12. Knippertz, P. et al. The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in West Africa. *Nat. Clim. Change* **5**, 815–822, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2727 (2015).

13. Parker, D. J. et al. The AMMA radiosonde program and its implications for the future of atmospheric monitoring over Africa. *Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.* **89**, 1015–1027, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2436.1 (2008).

14. Flamant, C. et al. The Dynamics-Aerosol-Chemistry-Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign: Overview and research highlights. *Bull. Am. Meteorol.* **99**, 83–104, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1 (2018).

15. Knippertz, P. et al. A meteorological and chemical overview of the DACCIWA field campaign in West Africa in June-July 2016. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **17**, 10893–10918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10893-2017 (2017).

16. Bessardon, G. E. Q., Fosu-Amankwah, K., Petersson, A. & Brooks, B. J. Evaluation of Windsond S1H2 performance in Kumasi during the 2016 DACCIWA field campaign. *Atmos. Meas. Tech.* **12**, 1311–1324, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1311-2019 (2019).

17. Aubinet, M. et al. Eddy covariance. A practical guide to measurement and data analysis (Springer Netherlands). ISBN 978-94-007-2350-4 (2012).
18. Kalthoff, N. et al. KITcube - A mobile observation platform for convection studies deployed during HyMeX. *Meteorol. Zeitschrift* **22**, 633–647, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0542 (2013).

19. Mauder, M. et al. A strategy for quality and uncertainty assessment of long-term eddy-covariance measurements. *Agric. For. Meteorol.* **169**, 122–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agriformet.2012.09.006 (2013).

20. Derrien, S. et al. 'DACCIWA field campaign, Savè super-site, UPS instrumentation'. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1618 (2016).

21. Kalapureddy, M. C. R., Lothon, M., Campistron, B., Lohou, F. & Saïd, F. Wind profiler analysis of the African Easterly Jet in relation with the boundary layer and the Saharan heat-low. *Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.* **136**, 77–91, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.494 (2010).

22. Lothon, M., Saïd, F., Lohou, F. & Campistron, B. Observation of the diurnal cycle in the low Troposphere of West Africa. *Mon. Weather Rev.* **136**, 3477–3500, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2427.1 (2008).

23. Rose, T., Crewell, S., Lohnert, U. & Simmer, C. A network suitable microwave radiometer for operational monitoring of the cloudy atmosphere. *Atmos. Res.* **75**, 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.12.005 (2005).

24. Bärfuss, K. et al. New set-up of the UAS ALADINA for measuring boundary layer properties, atmospheric particles and solar radiation. *Atmosphere* **9**(1), 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010028 (2018).

25. Altstädter, B. et al. ALADINA - An unmanned research aircraft for observing vertical and horizontal distributions of ultrafine particles within the atmospheric boundary layer. *Atmos. Meas. Tech.* **8**, 1627–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1627-2015 (2015).

26. Holben, B. N. et al. An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET. *J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.* **106**, 12067–12097, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900014 (2001).

27. Peters, G., Fischer, B., Münster, H., Clemens, M. & Wagner, A. Profiles of raindrop size distributions as retrieved by microrain radars. *J. Appl. Meteor.* **44**, 1930–1949, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2316.1 (2005).

28. Joss, J. & Waldvogel, A. Ein Spektrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung. *PAGEOPH* **68**, 240–246, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874898 (1967).

29. Oluwagbeniga, O. J. et al. DACCIWA field campaign, Ile Ife super-site, OAU instrumentation. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1702 (2016).

30. Brooks, B. J. DACCIWA field campaign, Kumasi super-site, Instrumentation. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1663 (2016).

31. Kohler, M. et al. DACCIWA field campaign, Savè super-site, Surface measurements. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1690 (2016).

32. Handwerker, J. et al. DACCIWA field campaign, Savè super-site, Cloud and precipitation. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1686 (2016).

33. Wieser, A. et al. DACCIWA field campaign, Savè super-site, Thermodynamic data sets. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/dacciwa.1659 (2016).

34. Bärfuss, K. et al. DACCIWA Savè super site. Atmospheric boundary layer properties and BC measured with the unmanned research aircraft ALADINA of the TU Braunschweig. *SEDOO OMP*. https://doi.org/10.6096/baobab-dacciwa.1701 (2017).

35. Pacifico, F. et al. Measurements of nitric oxide and ammonia soil fluxes from a wet savanna ecosystem site in West Africa during the DACCIWA field campaign. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 2299–2325, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2299-2019 (2019).

36. Bärfuss, K. et al. New setup of the UAS ALADINA for measuring boundary layer properties, atmospheric particles and solar radiation. *Atmosphere* **9**, 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9010028 (2018).

37. Dione, C. et al. Low-level stratiform clouds and dynamical features observed within the southern West African monsoon. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 8979–8997, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8979-2019 (2019).

38. Adler, B. et al. Nocturnal low-level clouds in the atmospheric boundary layer over southern West Africa: an observation-based analysis of conditions and processes. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 663–681, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-663-2019 (2019).

39. Babić, K. et al. The observed diurnal cycle of low-level stratus clouds over southern West Africa: a case study. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 1281–1299, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1281-2019 (2019).

40. Babić, K. et al. What controls the formation of nocturnal low-level stratus clouds over southern West Africa during the monsoon season? *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 13489–13506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13489-2019 (2019).

41. Lohou, F. et al. Conceptual model of diurnal cycle of low-level stratiform clouds over southern West Africa. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **20**, 2263–2275, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2263-2020 (2020).

42. Zouzoua, M. et al. Breakup of nocturnal low-level stratiform clouds during southern West African monsoon season. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **21**, 2027–2051, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2027-2021 (2021).

43. Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, X. et al. The diurnal stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition over land in southern West Africa. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **20**, 2735–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2735-2020 (2020).

44. Haslett, S. L. et al. The radiative impact of out-of-cloud aerosol hygroscopic growth during the summer monsoon in southern West Africa. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 1505–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1505-2019 (2019).

45. Altstädter, B. et al. The vertical variability of black carbon observed in the atmospheric boundary layer during DACCIWA. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **20**, 7911–7928, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7911-2020 (2020).

46. Deroubaix, A. et al. Diurnal cycle of coastal anthropogenic pollutant transport over southern West Africa during the DACCIWA campaign. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **19**, 473–497, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-473-2019 (2019).

47. Deetz, K. et al. Numerical simulations of aerosol radiative effects and their impact on clouds and atmospheric dynamics over southern West Africa. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **18**, 9767–9788, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9767-2018 (2018).

48. Reinares Martínez, I., Chaboureau, J.-P. & Handwerker, J. Warm rain in southern West Africa: A case study at Savè. *Atmosphere* **11**(3), 298, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11030298 (2020).

49. Lebel, T. et al. The AMMA field campaigns: Multiscale and multidisciplinary observations in the West African region. *Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.* **136**(s1), 8–3, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.486 (2009).

50. Fleury, L. et al. AMMA information system: an efficient cross-disciplinary tool and a legacy for forthcoming projects. *Atmos. Sci. Lett.* **12**, 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.303 (2011).

51. Bliefernicht, J. et al. The WASCAL hydro-meteorological observatory in the Sudan Savanna of Burkina Faso and Ghana. *Vadose Zone J.* **17**, 180065, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.03.0065 (2018).

52. Berger, S. et al. The impact of rain events on CO2 emissions from contrasting land use systems in semi-arid West African savannas. *Sci. Tot. Env.* **647**, 1478–1489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.397 (2019).

53. Documentation and instruction manual of the eddy-covariance software package TK3 (update), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany, 67 (ISSN 1614-8916). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20349 (2015).

54. Jacoby-Koaly, S. et al. Turbulent dissipation rate in the boundary layer via UHF wind profiler Doppler spectral width measurements. *Boundary-Layer Meteorol.* **103**, 361–389, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014985111855 (2002).

55. Lothon, M. et al. The BLLAST field experiment: Boundary-layer late afternoon and sunset turbulence. *Atmos. Chem. Phys.* **14**, 10931–10960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10931-2014 (2014).

56. Saïd, F. et al. Offshore winds obtained from a network of wind-profilers radars during HyMeX. *Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.* **142**, 23–42, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2749 (2016).

57. Löhnert, U. & Crewell, S. Accuracy of cloud liquid water path from ground-based microwave radiometry 1. Dependency on cloud model statistics. *Radio Sci.* **38**, 8041, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002654 (2003).
58. Löhnert, U., Turner, D. D. & Crewell, S. Ground-based temperature and humidity profiling using spectral infrared and microwave observations. Part I: Simulated retrieval performance in clear-sky conditions. *J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol.* **48**, 1017–1032, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC2060.1 (2009).

59. Cimini, D. et al. Towards the profiling of the atmospheric boundary layer at European scale – Introducing the COST Action PROBE. *B. Atmos. Sci. Tech.* **1**, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-020-00003-8 (2020).

60. Bauer-Pfundstein, M.R. & Görsdorf, U. Target separation and classification and classification using cloud radar Doppler spectra. *The 33rd Conference on Radar Meteorology*. https://ams.confex.com/ams/33Radar/techprogram/paper_123456.htm (6–10 August 2007) (Cairns, Queensland).

## Acknowledgements

The DACCIWA project has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 603502. We also want to thank staff from NCAS (National Centre for Atmospheric Science), KIT (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and UPS (Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse) for helping to install the equipment as well as the people from KNUST (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology) in Kumasi, INRAB (Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin) in Savè for allowing the equipment on their ground and NCAS for providing the instrumentation deployed at Kumasi. We thank the AERIS data infrastructure for providing access to the data used in this study.

## Author contributions

Ile-Ife site measurements: Oluwagbemiga Jegede contributed to the writing of the paper. Planned and coordinated the DACCIWA measurement campaign in Ile-Ife, provided all the logistics including instrument and manpower deployment, programming of data acquisition systems, field measurements, data retrieval and post-processing. Uploaded campaign data to the BAOBAB database. Muritala Ayoola participated in instrument deployment, field measurements, data retrieval and post-processing. Kumasi site measurements: Barbara Brooks contributed in the writing of the paper, planned the experiment, organised and coordinated the Kumasi site, prepared the experiment including the development of measurement strategy, participated in the measurement campaign and was responsible for the organisation of post-processing. Geoffrey Bessardon contributed in the writing of the paper, participated in the measurement campaign, was responsible for the Kumasi site night-time activities and the frequent radiosounding experiment. Programmed quick looks, performed data quality control, data post-processing, data documentation, generation of metadata. Victoria Smith participated in the instrumentation set-up, measurement campaign and the instrumentation pack-up, and was responsible for the Kumasi site activities during the second part of the campaign. James Groves participated in the experiment preparation, instrumentation set-up, programmed quick looks and was responsible for internet technology support before and during the campaign. Steven Sharpe participated in the instrumentation set-up, the instrumentation pack-up and was responsible for the NCAS team logistic support before and during the campaign. Jeffrey Nii Armah Aryee, Fred Cayle-Aethelhard and Winifred Ayinpogbilla Atiah participated in the instrumentation set-up the measurement campaign and the instrumentation pack-up. Kwabena Fosu-Amankwah participated in the instrumentation set-up, the measurement campaign and the instrumentation pack-up, and largely contributed to the frequent radiosounding activities. Leonard Kofitse Amekudzi contributed in the writing of the paper, was responsible for the logistics at KNUST and coordinated communication inter sites. Sylvester Danuor was responsible for the invitation for the NCAS team. Savè site measurements: Martin Kohler was responsible for the writing of the paper, participated in the measurement campaign, performed data quality control, data post-processing, data documentation, generation of metadata and submission of data to the database. Norbert Kalthoff contributed in the writing of the paper, planned the experiment, organised and coordinated the campaign, prepared the experiment including the development of measurement strategy, participated in the measurement campaign and was responsible for the organisation of post-processing. Bianca Adler contributed in the writing of the paper, contributed to the preparation of campaign including the development of measurement strategy, participated in the measurement campaign, programmed quick looks, performed data quality control, data post-processing, data documentation, generation of metadata and submission of data to the database. Karmen Babić contributed in the writing of the paper, performed data quality control, data post-processing, generation of metadata, and submission of data to the database. Jan Handwerker programmed quick looks, participated in the measurement campaign, generated metadata and submitted data to the database. Norbert Kunka established the infrastructure for data acquisition, data backup and network, and participated in the measurement campaign. Andreas Wieser was involved in organisation and coordination of the campaign, setup of instrumentation, participated in the measurement campaign and performed data quality control. Astrid Lampert has coordinated TU Braunschweig team and data analysis. Barbara Altstädter was involved in the data analysis of ABL properties and black carbon. Falk Pätzold was responsible for the instrumentation and data acquisition set-up, as well for data post-processing. Konrad Bärfuss was involved in the instrumentation and data acquisition set-up, data post-processing and campaign participation. Fabienne Lohou contributed in writing the paper, planned the experiment, organised and coordinated the Savè site, prepared the experiment including the development of measurement strategy, participated in the measurement campaign and was responsible for the organisation of post-processing. Yannick Bezombes was responsible engineer for the UHF wind profiler, participated to the settlement and monitoring of the UHF wind profiler. Guillaume Bret participated to the Savè site settlement and electricity installation at site. Claire Delon participated to the campaign and was responsible for chemistry measurement. Solene Derrien prepared the experiment and was responsible for the settlement and unsettlement of UPS devices. Cheikh Dione participated to the campaign and performed data quality control, data post-processing, generation of metadata, and submission of data to the database. Corinne Jambert participated to the campaign and was responsible for chemistry settlement, measurement and post-processing. Jérémy Leclercq was responsible for the computing network and data acquisition, helped on the instrumentation settlement. Marie Lothon prepared the experiment, participated to the campaign, was responsible for RPAS settlement and
performed data quality control, data post-processing, generation of metadata, and submission of data to the database. Patrice Medina was responsible engineer for OVLI-TA RPAS instrumentation, data acquisition and operations. Omar Gabella was responsible for the sky and IR cameras systems, data acquisition and control, participated to the field experiment. Xabier Pedruzo-Bagazgoitia, Irene Reinares Martínez, Pierre-Etienne Brilouet and Pierre Durand participated to the campaign. Data repository: Arnaud Miere handled the data sets in the BAOBAB repository.

## Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

**Supplementary information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01277-7.

**Correspondence** and requests for materials should be addressed to M.K.

**Reprints and permissions information** is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

**Publisher's note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2022