Improvement of Radioimmunotherapy Using
Pretargeting

Eric Frampas, Caroline Rousseau, Caroline Bodet-Milin, Jacques Barbet,

Jean-François Chatal, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré

► To cite this version:

Eric Frampas, Caroline Rousseau, Caroline Bodet-Milin, Jacques Barbet, Jean-Francois Chatal, et al. Improvement of Radioimmunotherapy Using Pretargeting. Frontiers in Oncology, 2013, 3, pp.159. 10.3389/fonc.2013.00159 . hal-04984173

HAL Id: hal-04984173

https://hal.science/hal-04984173v1

Submitted on 10 Mar 2025

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Improvement of radioimmunotherapy using pretargeting

Eric Frampas<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />, Caroline Rousseau<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />, Caroline Bodet-Milin<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="4" />, Jacques Barbet<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="5" />, Jean-François Chatal<fnref n="5" /> and Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="4" />*

**Edited by:**

Jean-Pierre Pouget, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, France

**Reviewed by:**

Joshua Silverman, New York
University Medical Center, USA
Michael Wayne Epperly, University of
Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, USA

**\*Correspondence:**

Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Centre Régional de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes/Angers, INSERM U892, CNRS UMR 7299, Université de Nantes, IRS-UN, 8 quai Moncousu, 44007 Nantes Cedex 1, France
e-mail: francoise.bodere@chunantes.fr

During the past two decades, considerable research has been devoted to radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies and receptor binding agents. Conventional radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is now an established and important tool in the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. For solid malignancies, the efficacy of RIT has not been as successful due to lower radiosensitivity, difficult penetration of the antibody into the tumor, and potential excessive radiation to normal tissues. Innovative approaches have been developed in order to enhance tumor absorbed dose while limiting toxicity to overcome the different limitations due to the tumor and host characteristics. Pretargeting techniques (pRIT) are a promising approach that consists of decoupling the delivery of a tumor monoclonal antibody (mAb) from the delivery of the radionuclide. This results in a much higher tumor-to-normal tissue ratio and is favorable for therapy as well and imaging. This includes various strategies based on avidin/streptavidin-biotin, DNA-complementary DNA, and bispecific antibody-hapten bindings. pRIT continuously evolves with the investigation of new molecular constructs and the development of radiochemistry. Pharmacokinetics improve dosimetry depending on the radionuclides used (alpha, beta, and Auger emitters) with prediction of tumor response and host toxicities. New constructs such as the Dock and Lock technology allow production of a variety of mABs directed against tumor-associated antigens. Survival benefit has already been shown in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Improvement in delivery of radioactivity to tumors with these pretargeting procedures associated with reduced hematologic toxicity will become the next generation of RIT. The following review addresses actual technical and clinical considerations and future development of pRIT.

**Keywords:** radioimmunotherapy, pretargeting, bispecific antibody, CEA, avidin-biotin

## INTRODUCTION

Conventional radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using an intravenously injected directly radiolabeled antibody has been extensively tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Its efficacy has been clearly documented in the most favorable clinical setting of disseminated small-size tumors especially those that are rapidly accessible to the injected antibody, such as bone marrow (Morschhauser et al., 2008). This efficacy has been limited in the situation of large tumor burden except for non-Hodgkin Lymphoma which is highly radiosensitive and thus needs a relatively small absorbed dose for an objective response. With these large tumors there is a considerable distance before the antibody molecule comes into contact with cancer cells. Some physiological barriers prevent the rapid diffusion of an antibody into the tumor. After reaching it the antibody molecule first encounters the antigen present at the surface of tumor cells in the perivascular space. A high binding affinity of the antibody can impede it from migrating deeply into the tumor whereas a low binding affinity allows a deeper penetration into the tumor (Sharkey and Goldenberg, 2005). After injection it takes 2–3 days before a maximum level of antibody concentration

is reached within the tumor. Finally, in general only a very small fraction of the injected activity will localize to the tumor, which explains the modest response rate that is usually observed.

As optimal tumor targeting requires a high tumor uptake and a low retention of radioactivity in normal tissues, especially in the blood, the situation is not favorable for large tumors over 3–4 cm in diameter. One way to improve this situation is to hasten antibody blood clearance by reducing the molecular size. Molecular engineering has allowed production of antibody forms with varied valencies and molecular sizes. One problem with smaller sized antibodies or antibody fragments is a faster clearance from the blood which is favorable for normal tissue toxicity, but also results in a low tumor uptake and retention with low tumor absorbed dose and no therapeutic efficacy.

Thus it appears that for unique or multiple macroscopic tumor targets larger than 3–4 cm in diameter, RIT with directly labeled antibodies cannot be therapeutically efficient. At best it can bring a useful contribution when used in combination with chemotherapy. This is why there is a critical need for innovative approaches to allow enhanced tumor absorbed doses whilst limiting hematologic

<footnote n="1">¹ Radiology Department, University Hospital, Nantes Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Le Centre Régional de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes/Angers, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Université de Nantes, Nantes Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Nuclear Medicine Department, Integrated Center of Oncology, Saint-Herblain, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Nantes Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Groupement d'Intérêt Public, Accelerator for Research in Radiochemistry and Oncology, Nantes Atlantic, Saint-Herblain, France</footnote>
toxicity. Pretargeting techniques can at least partially solve this problem.

## PRETARGETED RIT TECHNIQUES

The principle of pretargeted RIT consists of decoupling the delivery of a tumor specific antibody from the delivery of the radionuclide. In the first step a large saturating dose of the unlabeled antibody is injected and distributes throughout the body. The antibody molecule slowly binds to the tumor cells while clearing from other tissues. In the second step, at a later time of 2–4 days, when the concentration of the antibody in the tumor is at its peak and much higher than in normal organs, a radioactive small molecule is injected and rapidly reaches the tumor where it specifically binds to the pre-localized antibody. By comparison to the method of directly labeled antibody it results a much higher tumor-to-normal tissue ratio which is favorable for therapy.

## METHODS BASED ON AVIDIN/STREPTAVIDIN-BIOTIN BINDING

Several pretargeting methods have been developed including two in clinical studies: one of them was based on the four binding sites and the very high affinity ($10^{-15}$ M) of avidin for biotin (Hnatowich et al., 1987). In a first approach streptavidin is conjugated to an antibody molecule and intravenously injected. A few days later, radiolabeled biotin is injected and rapidly binds to tumor-localized streptavidin. Due to the large size of the streptavidin-antibody conjugate that results in a long residence time in the blood it is necessary to remove excess streptavidin-antibody conjugate from the blood using a clearing agent before injection of the radiolabeled biotin. In a second approach, biotin is conjugated to the antibody molecule. One or two days later, avidin which is glycosylated and rapidly cleared by the liver, is injected and removes biotin-antibody conjugate from the blood. Thirty minutes later streptavidin, which is not glycosylated and thus not cleared by the liver, is injected and after reaching the tumor binds strongly to the pre-localized biotin-antibody conjugate resulting in a high tumor-to-normal tissue ratio similar to the first approach.

Several antibodies have been conjugated with streptavidin and clinically tested (Knox et al., 2000; Shen et al., 2005). Interestingly, a 10-fold improvement of tumor-to-normal tissue ratios was observed with regard to the same directly radiolabeled antibodies confirming the interest of this approach. Using the three-step method with a biotin-antibody conjugate followed by avidin and streptavidin and then radiolabeled biotin, several clinical trials have been performed in Milan, Italy in patients with high-grade gliomas (Paganelli et al., 1998; Cremonesi et al., 1999; Grana et al., 2002). In comparison to a directly radiolabeled antibody, the three-step method allowed the injection of an activity of $^{90}$Y-biotin five times higher due to a much lower blood radioactive concentration. A total of 85 patients have been treated in 2 successive phase I and II studies. Quite interestingly, after a long follow-up life expectancy was longer than in the control group. Survival time was 33.5 months as compared with only 8 months for the control group (Grana et al., 2002).

## METHOD BASED ON DNA-COMPLEMENTARY DNA BINDING

The rationale for choosing this binding system is based on the high affinity of the interaction and non-immunogenicity

of the oligonucleotides. However, the suitability of the native phosphodiester DNA as an effector is limited by its susceptibility to nuclease hydrolysis. Morpholino oligomers (MORFs), are synthetic DNA analogs that have been reported to be water soluble, stable to nucleases, and highly specific for its complementary MORF (Liu et al., 2002). Several preclinical studies have been performed with $^{188}$Re (Liu et al., 2010) and $^{90}$Y (Liu et al., 2011) and tended to confirm the interest of this pretargeting technique, with high tumor-to-normal tissue ratios but no clinical study has been implemented yet.

## METHOD BASED ON BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY-HAPTEN BINDING

This alternative method initially called “Affinity Enhancement System (AES)” was first designed and developed in France and later optimized in the USA. It consists of firstly injecting an unlabeled bispecific antibody (BsmAb) made of an equimolecular amount of a Fab’ fragment of an anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody and a Fab’ fragment of an anti-DTPA-indium antibody. A few days later a radiolabeled bivalent hapten that quickly binds to the pre-localized BsmAb is injected and. In this system, the affinity of the hapten is limited but the bivalent hapten binds avidly to the BsmAb bound at the surface of tumor cells whereas the BsmAb-hapten complexes can dissociate in the blood with clearance of excess hapten through the kidneys.

The advantage of this pretargeting system with regard to directly radiolabeled antibodies was first documented preclinically in CEA-positive-human colorectal tumors (Gautherot et al., 1997). Biodistribution and therapeutic efficacy with the two-step method were compared with that of a directly labeled antibody using iodine-125 or iodine-131. With the directly labeled antibody maximal tumor uptake was observed late at 2 days and was higher than that of the two-step technique which showed a maximal tumor uptake at 1 h. Meanwhile, the directly labeled antibody cleared slowly from the blood by comparison with the radiolabeled hapten which cleared very rapidly. As a result very high tumor-to-blood ratios were achieved quickly with the two-step method. Consequently, for therapeutic application, a higher activity of iodine-131 was injected with the two-step method (111 MBq) compared to only 12 MBq with the directly labeled antibody, resulting in an equivalent hematologic toxicity in both groups. Due to the much higher injected activity with the radiolabeled hapten, therapeutic efficacy was much better with the two-step method with a tumor growth inhibition sustained over 150 days compared to the directly labeled antibody which induced only a growth delay of 53 days.

The results of this preclinical study were then confirmed by a clinical study in 11 patients with primary colorectal cancer (Le Doussal et al., 1993). These patients were injected with 1–10 mg of an anti-CEA/anti-DTPA BsmAb and 2–8 days later with an $^{111}$In-labeled DTPA dimer (222 MBq). The tumor was surgically resected 1–4 days after the last injection. The biodistribution results were compared with those obtained in six patients with similar clinical status and injected with directly labeled $^{111}$In-labeled anti-CEA F(ab')$_2$. Tumor uptake measured from resected tumors using the two-step approach was 1.8–17.5% injected dose/kg and not significantly lower than that found in the six patients injected with directly labeled antibody (5.5–30.2% injected dose/kg). Interestingly however, tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-liver ratios were
significantly improved with the two-step method in comparison with the one-step method (7.8 versus 4.2 for blood and 2.8 versus 0.8 for liver).

At this time the next consideration was what was the most appropriate clinical setting to clearly demonstrate the superiority of pretargeted RIT over conventional RIT with directly radiolabeled antibody. The final choice was medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) despite the low frequency of this type of cancer. Indeed this type of cancer is known to be well-vascularized and expresses a high density of CEA at the cell surface. Moreover, some specific biomarkers, namely calcitonin (Ct) and CEA, allow the evolution of the disease and the response to treatment to be monitored. Pretargeting studies in this setting started at the beginning of the 1990s and lasted more than 15 years.

# AES PRETARGETED RIT IN MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA

## CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF MTC

Medullary thyroid carcinoma represents less than 10% of all thyroid carcinoma and occurs both as a familial and a sporadic disease (Tubiana et al., 1968). Total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection is the primary treatment. After surgery, serum Ct is not detectable in more than 60% of patients without lymph node involvement, versus less than 20% of patients with lymph node spread (Machens et al., 2005; Fialkowski et al., 2008). As with other neuroendocrine tumors, prognosis of MTC is very heterogeneous and determination of prognostic indicators appears relevant (Byar et al., 1979; Tisell et al., 2003; Ito et al., 2005; Machens et al., 2005; Elisei et al., 2008; Fialkowski et al., 2008). In metastatic disease, cytoreductive therapeutic options are limited. Targeted therapy can be applied in progressive metastatic patients. Recently, disease stabilization has been reported with targeted therapy using multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) in advanced or metastatic MTC, and vandetanib has been approved in the USA (de Groot et al., 2007; Schlumberger et al., 2009; Lam et al., 2010; Wells et al., 2010, 2012). Prognosis of metastatic MTC varies from long- to short-term survival and highly reliable prognostic factors are needed for early detection of high-risk patients who require treatment, whereas low-risk patients warrant a “watch-and-wait” approach. The identification of predictive markers of response and survival appears very important in selecting patients most likely to benefit from a systemic therapy and to avoid exposing patients who are unlikely to respond or who have a long life expectancy from possible treatment-related adverse events and associated costs.

Among the various prognostic parameters that could identify high- and low-risk groups, advanced age, stage of the disease, the EORTC prognostic scoring system, and association with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2B are commonly accepted as prognostic factors (Byar et al., 1979; Tisell et al., 2003; Ito et al., 2005; Fialkowski et al., 2008). Moreover, mutations in the RET oncogene are associated with lower survival rates (Elisei et al., 2008). The Cdc25B phosphatase has also been shown as a new indicator of aggressive MTC (Ito et al., 2005). Tumor aggressiveness measured by Ki67 expression has been described as another prognostic factor (Tisell et al., 2003). By monitoring serum Ct and CEA concentration kinetics and calculating biomarker doubling-times (DT), Barbet et al. (2005) demonstrated that Ct DT was an

independent predictor of survival, with a high predictive value, in patients with measurable serum Ct, even after repeated surgery. In this study, all 41 patients with Ct DT >2 years were still alive at the end of the study, 2.9–29.5 years after initial surgery. Eight patients (67%) with DT between 6 months and 2 years died of the disease 40–189 months after surgery, and all 12 patients with Ct DT <6 months died of the disease 6 months–13.3 years after initial surgery. Laure Giraudet et al. (2008) confirmed the prognostic value of biomarker DT in a series of 55 consecutive patients.

## IMMUNODETECTION WITH PRETARGETING

Before assessing the efficacy in a therapeutic application, pretargeting was evaluated using scintigraphic imaging with anti-CEA × anti-DTPA-indium BsmAb and 111In-labeled bivalent DTPA hapten in preclinical and clinical studies (Vuillez et al., 1992; Peltier et al., 1993; Barbet et al., 1998; Hosono et al., 1998). In preclinical MTC models, pretargeting using AES method has demonstrated a more favorable therapeutic index than directly labeled anti-CEA mAb (Hosono et al., 1998). In the first clinical study performed in eight patients, immunoscintigraphy visualized all known tumors and detected previously unknown tumor sites (US and CT negative) in the neck and the liver (Peltier et al., 1993). There were no false-positive results. Immunoscintigraphy was completed by radioimmunoguided surgery with the help of a hand-held gamma probe. This technique allowed small tumors not detected by the surgeon to be localized but failed to detect two small lesions (1 × 1 cm) corresponding to fibrosis with infiltrated microscopic cancer. This first study was followed by a larger study performed on 44 patients with elevated Ct serum levels after resection of the primary MTC. Immunoscintigraphy was performed 2, 5, and 24 h after hapten injection and, when necessary, at longer time intervals. When available, a hand-held gamma probe was used during surgery. Fifteen patients had known tumor sites before immunoscintigraphy. Tumors were imaged in 12 (80%) of these patients, including three with liver metastases. Five unknown tumor sites were detected. For the 29 patients with occult disease, immunoscintigraphy detected high-activity uptake sites in 21 patients (72%), including 5 in the liver. Twelve were confirmed by surgery, one by guided morphologic imaging, and one by venous catheterization. Radioimmunoguided surgery was used on 14 patients. It was considered helpful by the surgeon in 12 patients, including 4 patients where it allowed the resection of small, non-palpable nor visible, tumor-involved lymph nodes. This short imaging study confirmed the advantage of pretargeting and provided an incentive to proceed to go to the next step of RIT.

## RIT IN METASTATIC MTC

A first phase I/II study was conducted in patients with metastatic MTC with the F(ab')₂ fragment of the anti-CEA mAb MN-14 labeled with iodine-131 (Juweid et al., 1999). Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. Myelosuppression was the only significant treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity. Human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) developed in eight patients. Seven patients had a median of 55% reduction of serum biomarkers. One patient showed a dramatic improvement in the mass effect on the airways caused by three tumor lesions in the neck, with a 45% reduction of overall tumor burden. The disease has continued to be
radiologically stable in 11 of 12 assessable patients for periods ranging from 3+ to 26+ months.

A second phase I clinical study was performed using the same radiolabeled mAb to determine the toxicity and therapeutic potential of high-dose ¹³¹I-MN-14 F(ab)₂ combined with autologous hematopoietic stem cell rescue in patients with rapidly progressing metastatic MTC (Juweid et al., 2000). Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. Starting doses were 900 cGy to the kidney and no more than 1200 cGy to the lung and liver, with dose increments of 300 cGy until the maximum tolerable dose is determined. Post-RAIT scintigraphies showed a tumor targeting in all patients. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells were given to all patients 1–2 weeks after therapy. Except for the instance of grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, non-hematologic toxicity was relatively mild, with only grade 1 or 2 toxicity observed in nine patients. No renal toxicity was seen. Of the 12 patients, 1 had partial remission for 1 year, another had a minor response for 3 months, and 10 had stabilization of disease lasting between 1 and 16 months.

A phase I/II clinical trial was started in 1996 to evaluate toxicity, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and anti-tumor activity of pRAIT using murine anti-CEA × anti-DTPA BsMAb F6x734 and a bivalent indium-DTPA hapten labeled with iodine-131, in 26 patients with metastatic MTC (Kraeber-Bodéré et al., 1999a). A good tumor targeting was observed in the majority of patients, with a high bone marrow uptake reflecting the high frequency of bone marrow involvement confirmed by MRI (Mirallié et al., 2005). Dose-limiting toxicity was hematological and maximum tolerated activity was estimated at 1.8 GBq/m² in the group of patients with suspected bone marrow involvement. Some tumor responses were observed, mainly in patients with a small tumor burden and after repeated courses of pRAIT. Because of a relatively high hematological toxicity and frequent immune responses, the chimeric anti-CEA × anti-DTPA hMN14x734 BsMAb was developed. A prospective phase I optimization study was performed in 34 patients with CEA-expressing tumors to determine optimal BsMAb dose, hapten activity, and pretargeting interval (Kraeber-Bodéré et al., 1999b, 2006). A BsMAb dose of 40 mg/m² with a pretargeting interval of 5 days appeared to be a good compromise between toxicity and efficacy. HAMA elevation was observed in 8% of patients and HAHA (human anti-human antibody) in 33%. **Figure 1** shows the good tumor uptake observed in a patient with a metastatic relapsing CEA-positive small cells lung cancer after injection of a therapeutic activity of indium-DTPA hapten labeled with iodine-131.

In 2006, Chatal et al. (2006) published a retrospective analysis of survival of the series of MTC patients involved in the two phase I/II pRIT clinical trials, comparing the survival of 29 patients given pRIT with that of 39 contemporaneous untreated patients for whom data were collected by the French Endocrine Tumor Group (GTE). A second objective was to examine whether post-pRIT variations of Ct DT could be used as a surrogate marker for survival by comparing, among treated patients, the survival of biological responders and non-responders, defining a responder as showing at least a 100% increase in Ct DT. The patients were stratified in risk-groups according to Ct DT, and patients with Ct DT <2 years were considered as high-risk patients. This study showed that overall survival (OS) was significantly

longer in high-risk treated patients than in high-risk untreated patients (median OS, 110 versus 61 months; *P* < 0.030). Treated patients with bone/bone marrow disease had a longer survival than patients without such involvement (10-year OS of 83 versus 14%; *P* < 0.023). Toxicity was mainly hematological and related to bone marrow involvement. Patients with grade 4 thrombocytopenia received platelet infusions and those with grade 4 leucopenia received G-CSF injections. No kidney toxicity was observed after pRIT.

Following the encouraging results obtained in the two phase I/II studies, a prospective phase II multicenter pRIT trial was undertaken in progressive MTC patients with Ct DT shorter than 5 years. From 2004 to 2008, 42 MTC patients were treated with 40 mg/m² of hMN-14xm734 and 1.8 GBq/m² ¹³¹I-di-DTPA-indium bivalent hapten 4–6 days later (Salaun et al., 2012). Patients were stratified in risk-groups according minimal DT (lowest value between Ct- and CEA-DT) as follows: high-risk patients with minimal DT lower than 6 months, intermediate-risk with DT between 6 months and 2 years, and low-risk with DT longer than 2 years. Disease control according RECIST criteria (objective response + stabilization) was observed in 32 patients (76.2%), including a durable complete response of at least 40 months in 1 patient (2.4%) and durable stable disease (≥6 months) in 31 patients (73.8%). Tumor uptake assessed by post-pRIT immunoscintigraphy was a significant predictor of response. **Figure 2** shows the good tumor uptake in a metastatic MTC patient. Subacute toxicity was mainly hematological, requiring

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** | **Immunoscintigraphies (posterior view) recorded in a patient with a metastatic CEA-positive small cells lung cancer.** This patient was injected with the anti-CEA hMN14x734 bispecific antibody and a therapeutic activity of ¹³¹I-di-DTPA-indium. The immunoscintigraphies recorded 3, 6, and 8 days after hapten injection showed a good uptake in lung (black arrow), mediastinum (white arrow), and brain (white arrowhead) metastases.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 2** | Immunoscintigraphy (anterior and posterior views) recorded in a patient with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma.</figcaption></figure>

This patient was injected with the anti-CEA hMN14x734 bispecific antibody and a therapeutic activity of 131I-di-DTPA-indium. The immunoscintigraphy recorded 4 days after hapten injection showed a good tumor uptake in liver (black arrow), bone (white arrow), and brain (white arrowhead) metastases.

careful post-RAIT blood monitoring. Pre-RAIT biomarker DT and impact on DT after pRIT were predictors of OS, confirming the value of serum biomarkers in selecting patients and monitoring therapy.

Radioimmunotherapy could also be applied in a multimodality strategy, especially in MTC patients with measurable metastatic lesions. A synergistic effect was observed in MTC animal models using a combination of RAIT with paclitaxel (Kraeber-Bodéré et al., 2002). Improvement of tumor response was also demonstrated using a combination of RAIT with anti-angiogenic agents such as thalidomide, CBOP11 (cyclopeptidic vascular endothelial growth inhibitor), or bevacizumab (Kraeber-Bodéré et al., 2010; Salaun et al., 2010). Pretreatment with bevacizumab improved RIT efficacy, with similar toxicity as compared to RIT alone. Pretreatment by CBOP11 or thalidomide sensitized larger tumors (>300 mm³), with increased leukopenia but not thrombocytopenia. An increase of the anti-tumor effect observed using the anti-angiogenic drug combined with RIT was correlated with a decrease of blood vessels shown by von Willebrand immunostaining. These combinations could be assessed in clinical trials in MTC patients with progressive and measurable tumor masses.

# FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS OF PRETARGETED RIT

## METHOD BASED ON BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY-HAPTEN BINDING

The two radionuclides usually used for RIT are yttrium-90 and lutetium-177 with a DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) chelating agent used for a stable binding. This chelating agent is not adapted to anti-DTPA(In) antibody which has been used up to now. Indeed, to ensure a high affinity binding to this antibody it is necessary to load DTPA with indium

and then to load DOTA for a good stability binding with yttrium-90 or lutetium-177. Consequently it was necessary to develop another hapten-binding system. An anti-hapten antibody directed to a derivative of histamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) with a high affinity was produced. Subsequently, a di-HSG-peptide was prepared containing a single DOTA and allowed accommodation of a number of radionuclides for imaging and therapeutic applications including $^{68}$Ga, $^{124}$I, $^{18}$F, $^{90}$Y, and $^{177}$Lu (Sharkey et al., 2010).

Concerning the optimal type of construct including the anti-CEA and anti-HSG antibodies it appeared that the trivalent form with two valencies for CEA and one for HSG had the highest targeting sensitivity. However, such an agent could not be efficiently produced with acceptable yields. That problem led to the design and development of an innovative and sophisticated system called Dock and Lock (Rossi et al., 2006). Finally, a trivalent bispecific structure referred to as TF2 and prepared using this Dock and Lock method was composed of three stably linked Fab fragments directed to CEA and a HSG peptide. The HSG peptide allows facile and stable labeling with different radiometals, such as $^{177}$Lu or $^{90}$Y, having favorable physical features that could improve pRIT efficacy (Goldenberg et al., 2008; Schoffelen et al., 2010a).

Pretargeting utilizes separate administrations of these two agents, and introduces new complexities concerning administration (molar doses of the agents, time interval between injections and bispecific antibody to peptide ratios) in order to optimize the treatment protocol. TF2 rapidly decreases in blood to less than 0.1% ID/g 24 h following injection. With a standard interval time of 24 h between the two agents, rapid tumor uptakes of 15.5% ID/g have been reported 1 h following the injection of the radiolabeled peptide in a hepatic metastases model of colonic carcinoma in mice, slowly decreasing to 4.6% ID/g at 48 h. In contrast, normal tissue uptakes were particularly low with maximal uptakes of 0.73% DI/g in blood and 2.38% ID/g in the kidneys leading to high tumor to non-tumor ratios, especially in the blood, as compared to direct RIT. Dosimetry and toxicity may be planned from models and pharmacokinetics, and the HSG peptide allows labeling with different radionuclides. As expected, due to the rapid clearance of the peptide, short-lived $^{211}$At was predicted to deliver the highest absorbed dose to the tumors, kidney being dose limiting. Other nuclides such as $^{90}$Y and $^{213}$Bi would also deliver highly absorbed doses to the tumors with acceptable absorbed dose to the kidneys. Beta emitters such as $^{90}$Y could be effective against larger tumors with an estimated absorbed dose of 4.2 Gy for subcutaneous tumors of 6 mm, with a favorable kidney dosimetry. A major point is that no significant toxicity to the bone marrow should be expected owing to the low activity in blood. (Frampas et al., 2011a,b).

Some clinical trials are ongoing using the trivalent bispecific anti-CEA and anti-HSG antibody TF2 and the $^{177}$Lu-DOTA-di-HSG-peptide IMP-288 in patients with colorectal cancer and small cell lung cancer.

The new generation AES products have a rapid distribution, suggesting benefit of labeling with short half-life PET emitters such as $^{68}$Ga or $^{18}$F, to develop a highly sensitive and specific immuno-PET method in CEA-expressing tumors. Immuno-PET and RIT could be applied in the context of a theranostic strategy (McBride et al., 2006, 2009; Karacay et al., 2011). Schoffelen et al.
(2010b) developed procedures for radiolabeling a small hapten-peptide (1451 Da) with $^{68}$Ga or $^{18}$F to compare their specificity with $^{18}$F-FDG for detecting tumors using a pretargeting procedure in animal models of CEA-positive-human colonic tumor and a CEA-negative tumor, or a local inflammation. The intravenous injection in mice of anti-CEA × anti-hapten BsMAb was followed 16 h later by the injection of 5 MBq of $^{68}$Ga- or $^{18}$F-labeled hapten peptides. Within 1 h, the CEA-positive tumor showed high and specific targeting of $^{68}$Ga-IMP-288 (10.7 ± 3.6% ID/g tumor uptake) and very low uptake in normal tissues (tumor-to-blood ratio of 69.9 ± 32.3), compared to the CEA-negative tumor and inflamed muscle (lower than 1.0% ID/g). Results were similar with $^{18}$F-labeled IMP-449. Contrary, $^{18}$F-FDG lacked in specificity as it localized efficiently to the tumor but also in the inflamed muscle (7.42 ± 0.20 and 4.07 ± 1.13% ID/g, respectively) and in several normal tissues. Pretargeted Immuno-PET appears as a highly sensitive and specific imaging method, well fitted with short-lived radionuclides, more specific than $^{18}$F-FDG-PET. Two immuno-PET clinical studies using new generation AES reagents and $^{68}$Ga started in 2012 in France, with the aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the method in CEA-positive MTC and breast carcinoma patients and to optimize the pretargeting parameters.

## METHOD BASED ON DNA-COMPLEMENTARY DNA BINDING

To improve the therapeutic index using the morpholino phosphorodiamidate oligomer (MORF)/complement MORF (cMORF) pretargeting system the CC49 antibody directed to TAG-72 tumor antigen has been conjugated with both biotin and MORF in tumor-bearing mice (Liu et al., 2010). This directly labeled antibody has been extensively tested in preclinical and clinical studies. One day later avidin was injected and led to a decrease of radioactive concentration in blood but not in the tumor resulting in a highly improved therapeutic index. This result should be confirmed in clinical studies.

## CONCLUSION

There is no doubt that some advantages of pretargeted RIT have been clearly documented both in preclinical and clinical studies with regards to directly radiolabeled antibodies. This allows a

significant increase in the tumor-to-normal tissue ratios, especially tumor-to-blood ratios, and subsequently allows a higher radioactivity level to be injected without impairing hematologic toxicity. Survival benefit has been shown using the two main pretargeting models. With the three-step pretargeting using biotinylated anti-tenascin antibody, avidin/streptavidin and $^{90}$Y-biotin, encouraging results have been obtained in patients with high-grade glioma (Paganelli et al., 2001). With the bispecific antibody-hapten pretargeting model a survival gain has also been documented in patients with rapidly progressing metastatic MTC (Chatal et al., 2006). Interestingly there were few objective responses but a long-term stabilization up to more than 10 years was observed in patients who progressed rapidly before RIT.

We can wonder what would be the best clinical indication for pretargeted RIT. Conventional RIT with directly labeled antibodies has proved to be efficient in the setting of disseminated microscopic disease with substantial gain in survival (Liersch et al., 2005, 2007; Morschhauser et al., 2008). In this situation of microscopic clusters of malignant cells located in bone marrow and thus rapidly accessible to intravenously injected antibody the potential interest of pretargeting is not obvious. Otherwise large tumors, more than 3–4 cm in diameter, are badly vascularized with necrotic regions which can prevent both directly labeled antibodies or unlabeled immunoconjugate from reaching and binding to tumor cells. Consequently the most appropriate situation could be intermediate tumor sizes in the range of 1–3 cm in diameter where tumor necrosis is still limited. In this situation the distribution of antibodies (labeled and unlabeled) could be roughly homogenous 2 or 3 days after injection and the pretargeting technique would allow injecting a higher activity level without impairing hematological toxicity. The ongoing clinical trials with the Dock and Lock technique are awaited before ascertaining the real future role of pretargeted immuno-Pet and RIT.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work has been in part supported by a Grant from the French National Agency for Research called "Investissements d'Avenir" n° ANR-11-LABX-0018-01 and by a Grant from the Pays de la Loire Regional Council called "NucSan."

## REFERENCES

Barbet, J., Campion, L., Kraeberbodéré, F., and Chatal, J.-F. (2005). Prognostic impact of serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling-times in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* 90, 6077–6084. doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0044

Barbet, J., Peltier, P., Bardet, S., Vuillez, J. P., Bachelot, I., Denet, S., et al. (1998). Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid carcinoma using indium-111 bivalent hapten and anti-CEA x anti-DTPA-indium specific antibody. *J. Nucl. Med.* 39, 1172–1178.

Byar, D. P., Green, S. B., Dor, P., Williams, E. D., Colon, J., van Gilse, H. A., et

al. (1979). A prognostic index for thyroid carcinoma. A study of the E.O.R.T.C. Thyroid Cancer Cooperative Group. *Eur. J. Cancer* 15, 1033–1041.

Chatal, J.-F., Campion, L., Kraeberbodéré, F., Bardet, S., Vuillez, J.-P., Charbonnel, B., et al. (2006). Survival improvement in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma who undergo pretargeted anti-carcinoembryonic-antigen radioimmunotherapy: a collaborative study with the French Endocrine Tumor Group. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 24, 1705–1711. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4917

Cremonesi, E., Ferrari, M., Chinol, M., Stabin, M. G., Grana, C., Prisco, G., et al. (1999). Three-step radioimmunotherapy with

yttrium-90 biotin: dosimetry and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med.* 26, 110–120. doi:10.1007/s002590050366

de Groot, J. W. B., Zonnenberg, B. A., van Ufford-Mannesse, P. Q., de Vries, M. M., Links, T. P., Lips, C. J. M., et al. (2007). A phase II trial of imatinib therapy for metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* 92, 3466–3469. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0649

Elisei, R., Cosci, B., Romei, C., Botici, V., Renzini, G., Molinaro, E., et al. (2008). Prognostic significance of somatic RET oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid cancer: a 10-year follow-up study. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.*

93, 682–687. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1714

Fialkowski, E., DeBenedetti, M., and Moley, J. (2008). Long-term outcome of reoperations for medullary thyroid carcinoma. *World J. Surg.* 32, 754–765. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9317-7

Frappas, E., Maurel, C., Remaud-Le Saëc, P., Mauxion, T., Faivre-Chauvet, A., Davodeau, F., et al. (2011a). Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases: models and pharmacokinetics predict influence of the physical and radiochemical properties of the radionuclide. *Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging* 38, 2153–2164. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1903-0
Frampas, E., Maurel, C., Thedrez, P.,
Remaud-Le Saëc, P., Faivre-Chauvet,
A., and Barbet, J. (2011b). The
intraportal injection model for
liver metastasis: advantages of
associated bioluminescence to assess
tumor growth and influences on
tumor uptake of radiolabeled anti-
carcinoembryonic antigen antibody.
*Nucl. Med. Commun.* 32, 147–154.
doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e328341
b268

Gautherot, E., Bouhou, J., Le Doussal,
J. M., Manetti, C., Martin, M.,
Rouvier, E., et al. (1997). Therapy
for colon carcinoma xenografts with
bispecific antibody-targeted,
iodine-131-labeled bivalent
hapten. *Cancer* 80, 2618–2623.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(1997)
1215)80:12+<2618::AID-CNCR
37>;3.3.CO;2-P

Goldenberg, D. M., Rossi, E. A.,
Sharkey, R. M., McBride, W. J.,
and Chang, C.-H. (2008). Multi-
functional antibodies by the Dock-
and-Lock method for improved can-
cer imaging and therapy by pre-
targeting. *J. Nucl. Med.* 49, 158–163.
doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.046185

Grana, C., Chinol, M., Robertson, C.,
Mazzetta, C., Bartolomei, M., De
Cicco, C., et al. (2002). Pretargeted
adjuvant radioimmunotherapy
with yttrium-90-biotin in malig-
nant glioma patients: a pilot
study. *Br. J. Cancer* 86, 207–212.
doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600047

Hnatowich, D. J., Virzi, F., and Rusck-
owski, M. (1987). Investigations
of avidin and biotin for imag-
ing applications. *J. Nucl. Med.* 28,
1294–1302.

Hosono, M., Hosono, M. N., Kraeber-
Bodéré, F., Devys, A., Thédrez, P.,
Fiche, M., et al. (1998). Biodis-
tribution and dosimetric study in
medullary thyroid cancer xenograft
using bispecific antibody and
iodine-125-labeled bivalent hapten.
*J. Nucl. Med.* 39, 1608–1613.

Ito, Y., Yoshida, H., Tomoda, C.,
Uruno, T., Takamura, Y., Miya,
A., et al. (2005). Expression of
cdc25B and cdc25A in medullary
thyroid carcinoma: cdc25B expres-
sion level predicts a poor prog-
nosis. *Cancer Lett.* 229, 291–297.
doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.040

Juweid, M. E., Hajjar, G., Stein, R.,
Sharkey, R. M., Herskovic, T.,
Swayne, L. C., et al. (2000). Ini-
tial experience with high-dose
radioimmunotherapy of metasta-
tic medullary thyroid cancer
using 131I-MN-14 F(ab)2 anti-
carcinoembryonic antigen MAb and
AHSCR. *J. Nucl. Med.* 41, 93–103.

Juweid, M. E., Hajjar, G., Swayne,
L. C., Sharkey, R. M., Suleiman,
S., Herskovic, T., et al. (1999).
Phase I/II trial of (131)I-MN-
14F(ab)2 anti-carcinoembryonic
antigen monoclonal antibody in
the treatment of patients with
metastatic medullary thyroid car-
cinoma. *Cancer* 85, 1828–1842.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(1999)
90415)85:8<1828::AID-CNCR25>;
3.0.CO;2-H

Karacay, H., Sharkey, R. M., McBride,
W. J., Rossi, E. A., Chang, C.-
H., and Goldenberg, D. M.
(2011). Optimization of hapten-
peptide labeling for pretargeted
immunoPET of bispecific anti-
body using generator-produced
68Ga. *J. Nucl. Med.* 52, 555–559.
doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.083568

Knox, S. J., Goris, M. L., Tempero,
M., Weiden, P. L., Gentner, L.,
Breitz, H., et al. (2000). Phase
II trial of yttrium-90-DOTA-biotin
pretargeted by NR-LU-10 anti-
body/streptavidin in patients with
metastatic colon cancer. *Clin. Cancer
Res.* 6, 406–414.

Kraeber-Bodéré, F., Bardet, S., Hoef-
nagel, C. A., Vieira, M. R., Vuillez, J.
P., Murat, A., et al. (1999a). Radioimm-
unotherapy in medullary thyroid
cancer using bispecific antibody and
iodine 131-labeled bivalent hapten:
preliminary results of a phase I/II
clinical trial. *Clin. Cancer Res.* 5,
3190s–3198s.

Kraeber-Bodéré, F., Faivre-Chauvet,
A., Saï-Maurel, C., Campion, L.,
Fiche, M., Gautherot, E., et al.
(1999b). Toxicity and efficacy of
radioimmunotherapy in carci-
noembryonic antigen-producing
medullary thyroid cancer xenograft:
comparison of iodine 131-labeled
F(ab')2 and pretargeted bivalent
hapten and evaluation of repeated
injections. *Clin. Cancer Res.* 5,
3183s–3189s.

Kraeber-Bodéré, F., Bodet-Milin, C.,
Niaudet, C., Saï-Maurel, C., Moreau,
A., Faivre-Chauvet, A., et al. (2010).
Comparative toxicity and efficacy
of combined radioimmunother-
apy and antiangiogenic therapy
in carcinoembryonic antigen-
expressing medullary thyroid cancer
xenograft. *J. Nucl. Med.* 51, 624–631.
doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.070714

Kraeber-Bodéré, F., Rousseau, C.,
Bodet-Milin, C., Ferrer, L., Faivre-
Chauvet, A., Campion, L., et al.
(2006). Targeting, toxicity, and
efficacy of 2-step, pretargeted
radioimmunotherapy using a
chimeric bispecific antibody and
131I-labeled bivalent hapten in a

phase I optimization clinical trial. *J. Nucl. Med.* 47, 247–255.

Kraeber-Bodéré, F., Saï-Maurel, C.,
Campion, L., Faivre-Chauvet,
A., Mirallié, E., Chérel, M., et
al. (2002). Enhanced antitumor
activity of combined pretargeted
radioimmunotherapy and pacli-
taxel in medullary thyroid cancer
xenograft. *Mol. Cancer Ther.* 1,
267–274.

Lam, E. T., Ringel, M. D., Kloos,
R. T., Prior, T. W., Knopp, M.
V., Liang, J., et al. (2010). Phase
II clinical trial of sorafenib in
metastatic medullary thyroid can-
cer. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 28, 2323–2330.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0068

Laure Giraudet, A., Al Ghulzan,
A., Aupérin, A., Leboulleux, S.,
Chehboun, A., Troalen, F., et al.
(2008). Progression of medullary
thyroid carcinoma: assessment
with calcitonin and carcinoem-
bryonic antigen doubling times.
*Eur. J. Endocrinol.* 158, 239–246.
doi:10.1530/EJE-07-0667

Le Doussal, J. M., Chetanneau, A.,
Gruaz-Guyon, A., Martin, M., Gau-
therot, E., Lehur, P. A., et al. (1993).
Bispecific monoclonal antibody-
mediated targeting of an indium-
111-labeled DTPA dimer to pri-
mary colorectal tumors: pharmaco-
kinetics, biodistribution, scintigra-
phy and immune response. *J. Nucl.
Med.* 34, 1662–1671.

Liersch, T., Meller, J., Bittrich, M., Kulle,
B., Becker, H., and Goldenberg, D.
M. (2007). Update of carcinoem-
bryonic antigen radioimmunother-
apy with (131)I-labetuzumab after
salvage resection of colorectal liver
metastases: comparison of out-
come to a contemporaneous con-
trol group. *Ann. Surg. Oncol.*
14, 2577–2590. doi:10.1245/s10434-
006-9328-x

Liersch, T., Meller, J., Kulle, B.,
Behr, T. M., Markus, P., Langer,
C., et al. (2005). Phase II trial of
carcinoembryonic antigen radioimmunotherapy with 131I-
labetuzumab after salvage resection
of colorectal metastases in the liver:
five-year safety and efficacy results.
*J. Clin. Oncol.* 23, 6763–6770.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.18.622

Liu, G., Dou, S., Baker, S., Akalin,
A., Cheng, D., Chen, L., et al.
(2010). A preclinical 188Re tumor
therapeutic investigation using
MORF/cMORF pretargeting and
an antiTAG-72 antibody CC49.
*Cancer Biol. Ther.* 10, 767–774.
doi:10.4161/cbt.10.8.12879

Liu, G., Dou, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Y.,
Rusckowski, M., and Hnatowich,

D. J. (2011). 90Y labeled phospho-
rodiamidate morpholino oligomer
for pretargeting radiotherapy.
*Bioconjug. Chem.* 22, 2539–2545.
doi:10.1021/bc200366t

Liu, G., Mangera, K., Liu, N., Gupta,
S., Rusckowski, M., and Hnatowich,
D. J. (2002). Tumor pretargeting in
mice using (99m)Tc-labeled mor-
pholino, a DNA analog. *J. Nucl. Med.*
43, 384–391.

Machens, A., Schneyer, U., Holzhausen,
H.-J., and Dralle, H. (2005).
Prospects of remission in medullary
thyroid carcinoma according to
basal calcitonin level. *J. Clin.
Endocrinol. Metab.* 90, 2029–2034.
doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1836

McBride, W. J., Sharkey, R. M., Karacay, H., D'Souza, C. A., Rossi, E. A., Laverman, P., et al. (2009). A novel method of 18F radiolabeling for PET. *J. Nucl. Med.* 50, 991–998. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.060418

McBride, W. J., Zanzonico, P., Sharkey,
R. M., Norén, C., Karacay, H.,
Rossi, E. A., et al. (2006). Bis-
pecific antibody pretargeting PET
(immunoPET) with an 124I-labeled
hapten-peptide. *J. Nucl. Med.* 47,
1678–1688.

Mirallié, E., Vuillez, J. P., Bardet, S.,
Frampas, E., Dupas, B., Ferrer, L.,
et al. (2005). High frequency of
bone/bone marrow involvement in
advanced medullary thyroid can-
cer. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.*
90, 779–788. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-
1500

Morschhauser, F., Radford, J., Van
Hoof, A., Vitolo, U., Soubeyran,
P., Tilly, H., et al. (2008). Phase
III trial of consolidation ther-
apy with yttrium-90-ibritumomab
tuxetan compared with no addi-
tional therapy after first remission
in advanced follicular lymphoma.
*J. Clin. Oncol.* 26, 5156–5164.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2015

Paganelli, G., Bartolomei, M., Ferrari,
M., Cremonesi, M., Broggi, G.,
Maira, G., et al. (2001). Pre-targeted
locoregional radioimmunotherapy
with 90Y-biotin in glioma patients:
phase I study and preliminary
therapeutic results. *Cancer Bio-
ther. Radiopharm.* 16, 227–235.
doi:10.1089/1084978015238
9410

Paganelli, G., Orecchia, R., Jereczek-
Fossa, B., Grana, C., Cremonesi,
M., De Braud, F., et al. (1998).
Combined treatment of advanced
oropharyngeal cancer with exter-
nal radiotherapy and three-step
radioimmunotherapy. *Eur.
J. Nucl. Med.* 25, 1336–1339.
doi:10.1007/s002590050305
Peltier, P., Curtet, C., Chatal, J. F., Le Doussal, J. M., Daniel, G., Aillet, G., et al. (1993). Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid cancer using a bispecific anti-CEA/anti-indium-DTPA antibody and an indium-111-labeled DTPA dimer. *J. Nucl. Med.* 34, 1267-1273.

Rossi, E. A., Goldenberg, D. M., Cardillo, T. M., McBride, W. J., Sharkey, R. M., and Chang, C.-H. (2006). Stably tethered multifunctional structures of defined composition made by the Dock and Lock method for use in cancer targeting. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 103, 6841–6846. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600982103

Salaun, P.-Y., Bodet-Milin, C., Frampas, E., Oudoux, A., Saï-Maurel, C., Faivre-Chauvet, A., et al. (2010). Toxicity and efficacy of combined radioimmunotherapy and bevacizumab in a mouse model of medullary thyroid carcinoma. *Cancer* 116, 1053–1058. doi:10.1002/cncr.24792

Salaun, P.-Y., Campion, L., Bournaud, C., Faivre-Chauvet, A., Vuillez, J.-P., Taieb, D., et al. (2012). Phase II trial of anticarcinoembryonic antigen pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in progressive metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: biomarker response and survival improvement. *J. Nucl. Med.* 53, 1185–1192. doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.101865

Schlumberger, M. J., Elisei, R., Bastholt, L., Wirth, L. J., Martins, R. G.,

Locati, L. D., et al. (2009). Phase II study of safety and efficacy of motesanib in patients with progressive or symptomatic, advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 27, 3794–3801. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.18.7815

Schoffelen, R., van der Graaf, W. T. A., Franssen, G., Sharkey, R. M., Goldenberg, D. M., McBride, W. J., et al. (2010a). Pretargeted 177Lu radioimmunotherapy of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing human colonic tumors in mice. *J. Nucl. Med.* 51, 1780–1787. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.079376

Schoffelen, R., Sharkey, R. M., Goldenberg, D. M., Franssen, G., McBride, W. J., Rossi, E. A., et al. (2010b). Pretargeted immuno-positron emission tomography imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumors with a bispecific antibody and a 68Ga- and 18F-labeled hapten peptide in mice with human tumor xenografts. *Mol. Cancer Ther.* 9, 1019–1027. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0862

Sharkey, R. M., and Goldenberg, D. M. (2005). Perspectives on cancer therapy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. *J. Nucl. Med.* 46(Suppl. 1), 115S–127S.

Sharkey, R. M., Rossi, E. A., McBride, W. J., Chang, C.-H., and Goldenberg, D. M. (2010). Recombinant bispecific monoclonal antibodies prepared by the Dock-and-Lock strategy for pretargeted

radioimmunotherapy. *Semin. Nucl. Med.* 40, 190–203. doi:10.1053/j semnuclmed.2009.12.002

Shen, S., Forero, A., LoBuglio, A. F., Breitz, H., Khazaeli, M. B., Fisher, D. R., et al. (2005). Patient-specific dosimetry of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy using CC49 fusion protein in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. *J. Nucl. Med.* 46, 642–651.

Tisell, L. E., Oden, A., Muth, A., Altiparkak, G., Mölne, J., Ahlman, H., et al. (2003). The Ki67 index a prognostic marker in medullary thyroid carcinoma. *Br. J. Cancer* 89, 2093–2097. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601453

Tubiana, M., Milhaud, G., Coutris, G., Lacour, J., Parmentier, C., and Bok, B. (1968). Medullary carcinoma and thyrocalcitonin. *Br. Med. J.* 4, 87–89. doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5623.87

Vuillez, J. P., Peltier, P., Caravel, J. P., Chetanneau, A., Saccavini, J. C., and Chatal, J. F. (1992). Immunoscintigraphy using 111In-labeled F(ab')2 fragments of anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody for detecting recurrences of medullary thyroid carcinoma. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* 74, 157–163. doi:10.1210/jc.74.1.157

Wells, S. A. Jr., Gosnell, J. E., Gagel, R. F., Moley, J., Pfister, D., Sosa, J. A., et al. (2010). Vandetanib for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 28,

767–772. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6604

Wells, S. A. Jr., Robinson, B. G., Gagel, R. F., Dralle, H., Fagin, J. A., Santoro, M., et al. (2012). Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. *J. Clin. Oncol.* 30, 134–141. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5040

**Conflict of Interest Statement:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Received: 29 April 2013; accepted: 04 June 2013; published online: 20 June 2013.

Citation: Frampas E, Rousseau C, Bodet-Milin C, Barbet J, Chatal J-F and Kraeber-Bodéré F (2013) Improvement of radioimmunotherapy using pretargeting. *Front. Oncol.* 3:159. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00159

This article was submitted to *Frontiers in Radiation Oncology*, a specialty of *Frontiers in Oncology*.

Copyright © 2013 Frampas, Rousseau, Bodet-Milin, Barbet, Chatal and Kraeber-Bodéré. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.