Liu, C., Xiao, Q., & Wang, B. (2008). An ensemble-based four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Part I: Technical formulation and preliminary test. *Monthly Weather Review*, **136**(9), 3363-3373. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008mwr2312.1

Liu, M., He, H., Ren, X., Sun, X., Yu, G., Han, S., et al. (2015). The effects of constraining variables on parameter optimization in carbon and water flux modeling over different forest ecosystems. *Ecological Modelling*, **303**, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.01.027

Lorenc, A. C. (1981). A global three-dimensional multivariate statistical interpolation scheme. *Monthly Weather Review*, **109**(4), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0701:agtdms>2.0.co;2

Lu, D., & Ricciuto, D. (2019). Efficient surrogate modeling methods for large-scale Earth system models based on machine-learning techniques. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **12**(5), 1791–1807. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1791-2019

Lü, H., Yu, Z., Zhu, Y., Drake, S., Hao, Z., & Sudicky, E. A. (2011). Dual state-parameter estimation of root zone soil moisture by optimal parameter estimation and extended Kalman filter data assimilation. *Advances in Water Resources*, **34**(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adwatres.2010.12.005

Lu, M., Lu, S., Liao, W., Lei, X., Yin, Z., & Wang, H. (2022). Research and application of parameter estimation method in hydrological model based on dual ensemble Kalman filter. *Hydrology Research*, **53**(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.272

Lu, X., Wang, Y.-P., Ziehn, T., & Dai, Y. (2013). An efficient method for global parameter sensitivity analysis and its applications to the Australian community land surface model (CABLE). *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, **182–183**, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.003

Luo, Y., Huang, Y., Sierra, C. A., Xia, J., Ahlström, A., Chen, Y., et al. (2022). Matrix approach to land carbon cycle modeling. *Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems*, **14**(7), e2022MS003008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003008

Luo, Y., Keenan, T. F., & Smith, M. (2015). Predictability of the terrestrial carbon cycle. *Global Change Biology*, **21**(5), 1737–1751. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12766

Ma, L., Hurtt, G., Ott, L., Sahajpal, R., Fisk, J., Lamb, R., et al. (2022). Global evaluation of the Ecosystem Demography model (ED v3.0). *Geoscientific Model Development*, **15**(5), 1971–1994. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022

MacBean, N., Bacour, C., Raoult, N., Bastrikov, V., Koffi, E. N., Kuppel, S., et al. (2022). Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in global carbon cycle predictions: Lessons and perspectives from 15 years of data assimilation studies with the ORCHIDEE terrestrial biosphere model. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, **36**(7), e2021GB007177. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gb007177

MacBean, N., Liddy, H., Quaife, T., Kolassa, J., & Fox, A. (2022). Building a land data assimilation community to tackle technical challenges in quantifying and reducing uncertainty in land model predictions. *Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society*, **103**(3), E733–E740. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-21-0228.1

MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Bacour, C., Lewis, P., Peylin, P., Guanter, L., et al. (2018). Strong constraint on modelled global carbon uptake using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data. *Scientific Reports*, **8**(1), 1973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20024-w

MacBean, N., Maignan, F., Peylin, P., Bacour, C., Bréon, F.-M., & Ciais, P. (2015). Using satellite data to improve the leaf phenology of a global terrestrial biosphere model. *Biogeosciences*, **12**(23), 7185–7208. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7185-2015

MacBean, N., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Scholze, M., & Schürmann, G. (2016). Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data assimilation system. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **9**(10), 3569–3588. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3569-2016

Mahmud, K., Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., Campany, C., & De Kauwe, M. G. (2018). Inferring the effects of sink strength on plant carbon balance processes from experimental measurements. *Biogeosciences*, **15**(13), 4003–4018. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4003-2018

Mäkelä, J., Arppe, L., Fritze, H., Heinonsalo, J., Karhu, K., Liski, J., et al. (2022). Implementation and initial calibration of carbon-13 soil organic matter decomposition in the Yasso model. *Biogeosciences*, **19**(17), 4305–4313. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4305-2022

Mäkelä, J., Knauer, J., Aurela, M., Black, A., Heimann, M., Kobayashi, H., et al. (2019). Parameter calibration and stomatal conductance formulation comparison for boreal forests with adaptive population importance sampler in the land surface model JSBACH. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **12**(9), 4075–4098. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4075-2019

Massoud, E. C., Xu, C., Fisher, R. A., Knox, R. G., Walker, A. P., Serbin, S. P., et al. (2019). Identification of key parameters controlling demographically structured vegetation dynamics in a land surface model: CLM4.5(FATES). *Geoscientific Model Development*, **12**(9), 4133–4164. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4133-2019

Mathers, C., Black, C. K., Segal, B. D., Gurung, R. B., Zhang, Y., Easter, M. J., et al. (2023). Validating DayCent-CR for cropland soil carbon offset reporting at a national scale. *Geoderma*, **438**, 116647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116647

Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R., et al. (2019). Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO₂. *Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems*, **11**(4), 998–1038. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001400

McGovern, A., Elmore, K. L., Gagne, D. J., II, Haupt, S. E., Karstens, C. D., Lagerquist, R., et al. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to improve real-time decision-making for high-impact weather. *Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society*, **98**(10), 2073–2090. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-16-0123.1

McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. *Technometrics: A Journal of Statistics for the Physical, Chemical, and Engineering Sciences*, **21**(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522

McNeall, D., Robertson, E., & Wiltshire, A. (2024). Constraining the carbon cycle in JULES-ES-1.0. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **17**(3), 1059–1089. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1059-2024

Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Hollinger, D. Y., & Moorcroft, P. R. (2009). Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, **114**(G1), G01002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000812

Meirink, J. F., Bergamaschi, P., & Krol, M. C. (2008). Four-dimensional variational data assimilation for inverse modelling of atmospheric methane emissions: Method and comparison with synthesis inversion. *Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics*, **8**(21), 6341–6353. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6341-2008

Melton, J. R., Arora, V. K., Wisernig-Cojoc, E., Seiler, C., Fortier, M., Chan, E., & Teckentrup, L. (2020). CLASSIC v1.0: The open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM)—Part 1: Model framework and site-level performance. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **13**(6), 2825–2850. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2825-2020

Meunier, F., Visser, M. D., Shiklomanov, A., Dietze, M. C., Guzmán Q. J. A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., et al. (2022). Liana optical traits increase tropical forest albedo and reduce ecosystem productivity. *Global Change Biology*, **28**(1), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15928

Meyer, D., Grimmond, S., Dueben, P., Hogan, R., & van Reeuwijk, M. (2022). Machine learning emulation of urban land surface processes. *Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems*, **14**(3), e2021MS002744. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002744
Moorcroft, P. R., Hurtt, G. C., & Pacala, S. W. (2001). A method for scaling vegetation dynamics: The ecosystem demography model. *Ecological Monographs*, **71**(4), 557–586. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0557:AMFSVD]2.0.CO;2

Moore, D. J. P., Hu, J., Sacks, W. J., Schimel, D. S., & Monson, R. K. (2008). Estimating transpiration and the sensitivity of carbon uptake to water availability in a subalpine forest using a simple ecosystem process model informed by measured net CO₂ and H₂O fluxes. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, **148**(10), 1467–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.04.013

Moradkhani, H., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., & Houser, P. R. (2005). Dual state–parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter. *Advances in Water Resources*, **28**(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adwwatres.2004.09.002

Morris, M. D. (1991). Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. *Technometrics: A Journal of Statistics for the Physical, Chemical, and Engineering Sciences*, **33**(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804

Nave, L., Johnson, K., van Ingen, C., Agarwal, D., Humphrey, M., & Beekwilder, N. (2016). International Soil Carbon Network (ISCN) database v3-1. https://doi.org/10.17040/ISCN/1305039

Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. *The Computer Journal*, **7**(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

Nelson, J. A., Walther, S., Gans, F., Kraft, B., Weber, U., Novick, K., et al. (2024). X-BASE: The first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X. In *EGUSphere*. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-165

Nicolini, G., Castaldi, S., Fratini, G., & Valentini, R. (2013). A literature overview of micrometeorological CH₄ and N₂O flux measurements in terrestrial ecosystems. *Atmospheric Environment*, **81**, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.030

Nie, S., Zhu, J., & Luo, Y. (2011). Simultaneous estimation of land surface scheme states and parameters using the ensemble Kalman filter: Identical twin experiments. *Hydrology and Earth System Sciences*, **15**(8), 2437–2457. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2437-2011

Norton, A. J., Rayner, P. J., Koffi, E. N., & Scholze, M. (2018). Assimilating solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence into the terrestrial biosphere model BETHY-SCOPE v1.0: Model description and information content. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **11**(4), 1517–1536. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1517-2018

Norton, A. J., Rayner, P. J., Koffi, E. N., Scholze, M., Silver, J. D., & Wang, Y.-P. (2019). Estimating global gross primary productivity using chlorophyll fluorescence and a data assimilation system with the BETHY-SCOPE model. *Biogeosciences*, **16**(15), 3069–3093. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3069-2019

Novick, K. A., Ficklin, D. L., Baldocchi, D., Davis, K. J., Ghezzehei, T. A., Konings, A. G., et al. (2022). Confronting the water potential information gap. *Nature Geoscience*, **15**(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00909-2

Oberpriller, J., Cameron, D. R., Dietze, M. C., & Hartig, F. (2021). Towards robust statistical inference for complex computer models. *Ecology Letters*, **24**(6), 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13728

Oberpriller, J., Herschlein, C., Anthoni, P., Arneth, A., Krause, A., Rammig, A., et al. (2022). Climate and parameter sensitivity and induced uncertainties in carbon stock projections for European forests (using LPJ-GUESS 4.0). *Geoscientific Model Development*, **15**(16), 6495–6519. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022

Olivera-Guerra, L.-E., Ottlé, C., Raoult, N., & Peylin, P. (2024). Assimilating ESA-CCI land surface temperature into the ORCHIDEE land surface model: Insights from a multi-site study across Europe. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-546

Owen, A. B. (2013). Monte Carlo theory, methods and examples (Vol. 16, pp. 19–22). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op view_citation&hl=en&citation_for_view=owV8q1cAAAAJ:tOudhMTPpwUC

Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V., & Ojima, D. S. (1987). Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. *Soil Science Society of America. Soil Science Society of America*, **51**(5), 1173–1179. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x

Peatier, S., Sanderson, B. M., & Terray, L. (2023). On the spatial calibration of imperfect climate models. In *EGUSphere*. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2269

Peylin, P., Bacour, C., MacBean, N., Leonard, S., Rayner, P., Kuppel, S., et al. (2016). A new stepwise carbon cycle data assimilation system using multiple data streams to constrain the simulated land surface carbon cycle. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **9**(9), 3321–3346. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3321-2016

Pianosi, F., Iwema, J., Rosolem, R., & Wagener, T. (2017). A multimethod global sensitivity analysis approach to support the calibration and evaluation of land surface models. In *Sensitivity analysis in Earth observation modelling* (pp. 125–144). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803011-0.00007-0

Pinnington, E., Amezcua, J., Cooper, E., Dadson, S., Ellis, R., Peng, J., et al. (2021). Improving soil moisture prediction of a high-resolution land surface model by parameterising pedotransfer functions through assimilation of SMAP satellite data. *Hydrology and Earth System Sciences*, **25**(3), 1617–1641. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1617-2021

Pinnington, E., Quaife, T., & Black, E. (2018). Impact of remotely sensed soil moisture and precipitation on soil moisture prediction in a data assimilation system with the JULES land surface model. *Hydrology and Earth System Sciences*, **22**(4), 2575–2588. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2575-2018

Pinnington, E., Quaife, T., Lawless, A., Williams, K., Arkebauer, T., & Scoby, D. (2020). The land variational ensemble data assimilation framework: LAVENDAR v1.0.0. *Geoscientific Model Development*, **13**(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-55-2020

Pinnington, E. M., Casella, E., Dance, S. L., Lawless, A. S., Morison, J. I. L., Nichols, N. K., et al. (2017). Understanding the effect of disturbance from selective felling on the carbon dynamics of a managed woodland by combining observations with model predictions. *Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences*, **122**(4), 886–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD003760

Pinty, B., Lavergne, T., Voßbeck, M., Kaminski, T., Aussedat, O., Giering, R., et al. (2007). Retrieving surface parameters for climate models from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) albedo products. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, **112**(D10116. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008105

Post, H., Vrugt, J. A., Fox, A., Vereecken, H., & Hendricks Franssen, H.-J. (2017). Estimation of Community Land Model parameters for an improved assessment of net carbon fluxes at European sites: Estimation of CLM parameters. *Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences*, **122**(3), 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg003297

Potapov, P., Li, X., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Hansen, M. C., Kommareddy, A., et al. (2021). Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, **253**, 112165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165

Prihodko, L., Denning, A. S., Hanan, N. P., Baker, I., & Davis, K. (2008). Sensitivity, uncertainty and time dependence of parameters in a complex land surface model. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, **148**(2), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.08.006

Quaife, T., Lewis, P., Dekauwe, M., Williams, M., Law, B., Disney, M., & Bowyer, P. (2008). Assimilating canopy reflectance data into an ecosystem model with an Ensemble Kalman Filter. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, **112**(4), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.05.020
Quegan, S., Le Toan, T., Chave, J., Dall, J., Exbrayat, J.-F., Minh, D. H. T., et al. (2019). The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: Measuring forest above-ground biomass from space. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, 227, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.032

Raczka, B., Dietze, M. C., Serbin, S. P., & Davis, K. J. (2018). What limits predictive certainty of long-term carbon uptake? *Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences*, 123(12), 3570–3588. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jg004504

Raczka, B., Hoar, T. M., Duarte, H. F., Fox, A. M., Anderson, J. L., Bowling, D. R., & Lin, J. C. (2021). Improving CLM5.0 biomass and carbon exchange simulations across the Western U.S. using a data assimilation system. *Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems*, 13(7), e2020MS002421. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002421

Raiho, A. M., Nicklen, E. F., Foster, A. C., Roland, C. A., & Hooten, M. B. (2021). Bridging implementation gaps to connect large ecological datasets and complex models. *Ecology and Evolution*, 11(24), 18271–18287. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8420

Raiho, A. M., Paciorek, C. J., Dawson, A., Jackson, S. T., Mladenoff, D. J., Williams, J. W., & McLachlan, J. S. (2022). 8000-year doubling of Midwestern forest biomass driven by population-and biome-scale processes. *Science*, 376(6600), 1491–1495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk3126

Raoult, N., Beylat, S., Salter, J. M., Hourdin, F., Bastrikov, V., Ottlé, C., & Peylin, P. (2024). Exploring the potential of history matching for land surface model calibration. *Geoscientific Model Development*, 17(15), 5779–5801. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024

Raoult, N., Edouard-Rambaut, L.-A., Vuichard, N., Bastrikov, V., Lansø, A. S., Guenet, B., & Peylin, P. (2024). Using Free Air CO₂ Enrichment data to constrain land surface model projections of the terrestrial carbon cycle. *Biogeosciences*, 21(4), 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1017-2024

Raoult, N., Ottlé, C., Peylin, P., Bastrikov, V., & Maugis, P. (2021). Evaluating and optimizing surface soil moisture drydowns in the ORCHIDEE land surface model at in situ locations. *Journal of Hydrometeorology*, 22(4), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-20-0115.1

Raoult, N. M., Jupp, T. E., Cox, P. M., & Luke, C. M. (2016). Land-surface parameter optimisation using data assimilation techniques: The adJULES system V1.0. *Geoscientific Model Development*, 9(8), 2833–2852. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2833-2016

Rayner, P. J. (2010). The current state of carbon-cycle data assimilation. *Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability*, 2(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.005

Rayner, P. J., Koffi, E., Scholze, M., Kaminski, T., & Dufresne, J.-L. (2011). Constraining predictions of the carbon cycle using data. *Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences*, 369(1943), 1955–1966. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0378

Rayner, P. J., Michalak, A. M., & Chevallier, F. (2019). Fundamentals of data assimilation applied to biogeochemistry. *Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics*, 19(22), 13911–13932. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019

Rayner, P. J., Scholze, M., Knorr, W., Kaminski, T., Giering, R., & Widmann, H. (2005). Two decades of terrestrial carbon fluxes from a carbon cycle data assimilation system (CCDAS). *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 19(2), GB2026. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gb002254

Reichle, R. H., & Koster, R. D. (2004). Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture. *Geophysical Research Letters*, 31(19), L19501. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020938

Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., & Carvalhais, N. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. *Nature*, 566(7743), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

Reick, C. H., Gayler, V., Goll, D., Hagemann, S., & Heidkamp, M. (2021). The land component of the MPI Earth System Model: Documentation of version 3.2. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3279802/component/file_3316522/content

Ricciuto, D. M., Butler, M. P., Davis, K. J., Cook, B. D., Bakwin, P. S., Andrews, A., & Teclaw, R. M. (2008). Causes of interannual variability in ecosystem–atmosphere CO₂ exchange in a northern Wisconsin forest using a Bayesian model calibration. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 148(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.08.007

Ricciuto, D. M., King, A. W., Dragoni, D., & Post, W. M. (2011). Parameter and prediction uncertainty in an optimized terrestrial carbon cycle model: Effects of constraining variables and data record length. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, 116(G1), G01033. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001400

Richardson, A. D., Williams, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Moore, D. J., Dail, D. B., Davidson, E. A., et al. (2010). Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints. *Oecologia*, 164(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1628-y

Rödenbeck, C., Houweling, S., Gloor, M., & Heimann, M. (2003). CO₂ flux history 1982–2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport. *Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics*, 3(6), 1919–1964. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1919-2003

Rodríguez-Fernández, N., de Rosnay, P., Albergel, C., Richaume, P., Aires, F., Prigent, C., & Kerr, Y. (2019). SMOS neural network Soil Moisture data assimilation in a Land surface model and atmospheric impact. *Remote Sensing*, 11(11), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111334

Rowland, L., Hill, T. C., Stahl, C., Siebicke, L., Burban, B., Zaragoza-Castells, J., et al. (2014). Evidence for strong seasonality in the carbon storage and carbon use efficiency of an Amazonian forest. *Global Change Biology*, 20(3), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12375

Running, S., Mu, Q., & Zhao, M. (2021). MODIS/Terra gross primary productivity 8-day L4 global 500m SIN grid V061 [Dataset]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A2H.061

Sacks, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Monson, R. K., & Braswell, B. H. (2006). Model-data synthesis of diurnal and seasonal CO₂ fluxes at Niwot Ridge, Colorado: Model-data synthesis of CO₂ fluxes. *Global Change Biology*, 12(2), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01059.x

Salmon, E., Jégou, F., Guenet, B., Jourdain, L., Qiu, C., Bastrikov, V., et al. (2022). Assessing methane emissions for northern peatlands in ORCHIDEE-PEAT revision 7020. *Geoscientific Model Development*, 15(7), 2813–2838. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022

Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., et al. (2008). *Global sensitivity analysis: The primer*. Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL33376474M/Global_Sensitivity_Analysis

Sanderson, B. (2020). The role of prior assumptions in carbon budget calculations. *Earth System Dynamics*, 11(2), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-563-2020

Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., Aina, T., Christensen, C., Faull, N., Frame, D. J., et al. (2008). Constraints on model response to greenhouse gas forcing and the role of subgrid-scale processes. *Journal of Climate*, 21(11), 2384–2400. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCL11869.1

Santaren, D., Peylin, P., Viovy, N., & Ciais, P. (2007). Optimizing a process-based ecosystem model with eddy-covariance flux measurements: A pine forest in southern France. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 21(2), GB2013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002834

Sawada, Y. (2020). Machine learning accelerates parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment of a land surface model. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, 125(20), e2020JD032688. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jd032688

Scholze, M., Buchwitz, M., Dorigo, W., Guanter, L., & Quegan, S. (2017). Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems. *Biogeosciences*, 14(14), 3401–3429. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3401-2017

Scholze, M., Kaminski, T., Knorr, W., Blessing, S., Vossbeck, M., Grant, J. P., & Scipal, K. (2016). Simultaneous assimilation of SMOS soil moisture and atmospheric CO₂ in-situ observations to constrain the global terrestrial carbon cycle. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, 180, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.058
Scholze, M., Kaminski, T., Knorr, W., Voßbeck, M., Wu, M., Ferrazzoli, P., et al. (2019). Mean European carbon sink over 2010–2015 estimated by simultaneous assimilation of atmospheric CO2, soil moisture, and vegetation optical depth. *Geophysical Research Letters*, *46*(23), 13796–13803. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085725

Scholze, M., Kaminski, T., Rayner, P., Knorr, W., & Giering, R. (2007). Propagating uncertainty through prognostic carbon cycle data assimilation system simulations. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, *112*(D17), D17305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008642

Schürmann, G. J., Kaminski, T., Köstler, C., Carvalhais, N., Voßbeck, M., Kattge, J., et al. (2016). Constraining a land-surface model with multiple observations by application of the MPI-Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System V1.0. *Geoscientific Model Development*, *9*(9), 2999–3026. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2999-2016

Scrucca, L. (2013). GA: A package for genetic algorithms in R. *Journal of Statistical Software*, *53*(4), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v053.i04

Seiler, C., Melton, J. R., Arora, V. K., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Anthoni, P., et al. (2022). Are terrestrial biosphere models fit for simulating the global land carbon sink? *Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems*, *14*(5), e2021MS002946. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002946

Sellers, P. J., Randall, D. A., Collatz, G. J., Berry, J. A., Field, C. B., Dazlich, D. A., et al. (1996). A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmosphere–biosphere interaction. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0676:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2

Shan, X., Steele-Dunne, S., Huber, M., Hahn, S., Wagner, W., Bonan, B., et al. (2022). Towards constraining soil and vegetation dynamics in land surface models: Modeling ASCAT backscatter incidence-angle dependence with a Deep Neural Network. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, *279*, 11316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.11316

Shen, C., Appling, A. P., Gentine, P., Bandai, T., Gupta, H., Tartakovsky, A., et al. (2023). Differentiable modelling to unify machine learning and physical models for geosciences. *Nature Reviews Earth & Environment*, *4*(8), 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00450-9

Shi, Y., Davis, K. J., Zhang, F., Duffy, C. J., & Yu, X. (2014). Parameter estimation of a physically based land surface hydrologic model using the ensemble Kalman filter: A synthetic experiment. *Water Resources Research*, *50*(1), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014070

Shi, Y., Davis, K. J., Zhang, F., Duffy, C. J., & Yu, X. (2015). Parameter estimation of a physically based land surface hydrologic model using an ensemble Kalman filter: A multivariate real-data experiment. *Advances in Water Resources*, *83*, 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.009

Shi, Z., Allison, S. D., He, Y., Levine, P. A., Hoyt, A. M., Beem-Miller, J., et al. (2020). The age distribution of global soil carbon inferred from radiocarbon measurements. *Nature Geoscience*, *13*(8), 555–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0596-z

Shi, Z., Hoffman, F. M., Xu, M., Mishra, U., Allison, S. D., Zhou, J., & Randerson, J. T. (2024). Global-scale convergence obscures inconsistencies in soil carbon change predicted by Earth system models. *AGU Advances*, *5*(2), e2023AV001068. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023av001068

Shiklomanov, A. N., Cowdery, E. M., Bahn, M., Byun, C., Jansen, S., Kramer, K., et al. (2018). Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within plant functional types? A Bayesian multivariate trait meta-analysis. In *bioRxiv*. https://doi.org/10.1101/475038

Shiklomanov, A. N., Dietze, M. C., Fer, I., Viskari, T., & Serbin, S. P. (2021). Cutting out the middleman: Calibrating and validating a dynamic vegetation model (ED2-PROSPECT5) using remotely sensed surface reflectance. *Geoscientific Model Development*, *14*(5), 2603–2633. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2603-2021

Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Armon, A. (2022). Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need. *An International Journal on Information Fusion*, *81*, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011

Sitch, S., O'Sullivan, M., Robertson, E., Friedlingstein, P., Albergel, C., Anthoni, P., et al. (2024). Trends and drivers of terrestrial sources and sinks of carbon dioxide: An overview of the TRENDY project. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, *38*(7), e2024GB008102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gb008102

Smallman, T. L., Milodowski, D. T., Neto, E. S., Koren, G., Ometto, J., & Williams, M. (2021). Parameter uncertainty dominates C-cycle forecast errors over most of Brazil for the 21st century. *Earth System Dynamics*, *12*(4), 1191–1237. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1191-2021

Smith, B. (2007). LPJ-GUESS—An ecosystem modelling framework. https://www.baltex-research.eu/baltic2009/downloads/Literature/Specific/Smith_guess_software.pdf

Smith, C., Cummins, D. P., Fredriksen, H.-B., Nicholls, Z., Meinshausen, M., Allen, M., et al. (2024). fair-calibrate v1.4.1: Calibration, constraining and validation of the FaIR simple climate model for reliable future climate projections. In *EGUSphere*. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-708

Sobol', I. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. *Mathematics and Computers in Simulation*, *55*(1–3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6

Song, H., Triguero, I., & Özcan, E. (2019). A review on the self and dual interactions between machine learning and optimisation. *Progress in Artificial Intelligence*, *8*(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-019-00185-z

Speich, M., Dormann, C. F., & Hartig, F. (2021). Sequential Monte-Carlo algorithms for Bayesian model calibration—A review and method comparison. *Ecological Modelling*, *455*, 109608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109608

Stewart, L. M., Dance, S. L., & Nichols, N. K. (2008). Correlated observation errors in data assimilation. *International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids*, *56*(8), 1521–1527. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1636

Stöckli, R., Rutishauser, T., Dragoni, D., O'Keefe, J., Thornton, P. E., Jolly, M., et al. (2008). Remote sensing data assimilation for a prognostic phenology model: Data assimilation and phenology modeling. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, *113*(G4), G01021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jg000781

Sun, Y., Goll, D. S., Huang, Y., Ciais, P., Wang, Y.-P., Bastrikov, V., & Wang, Y. (2023). Machine learning for accelerating process-based computation of land biogeochemical cycles. *Global Change Biology*, *29*(11), 3221–3234. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16623

Talagrand, O., & Courtier, P. (1987). Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. I: Theory: Variational assimilation. *I: Theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Royal Meteorological Society (Great Britain)*, *113*(478), 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711347812

Tao, F., Houlton, B. Z., Huang, Y., Wang, Y.-P., Manzoni, S., Ahrens, B., et al. (2024). Convergence in simulating global soil organic carbon by structurally different models after data assimilation. *Global Change Biology*, *30*(5), e17297. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17297

Tao, F., Zhou, Z., Huang, Y., Li, Q., Lu, X., Ma, S., et al. (2020). Deep learning optimizes data-driven representation of soil organic carbon in Earth system model over the conterminous United States. *Frontiers in Big Data*, *3*, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.00017

Tarantola, A. (1987). Inversion of travel times and seismic waveforms. In *Seismic tomography* (pp. 135–157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3899-1_6

Tarantola, A. (2005). Back matter. In *Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation* (pp. 317–342). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717921.bm

Thomas, R. Q., Brooks, E. B., Jersild, A. L., Ward, E. J., Wynne, R. H., Albaugh, T. J., et al. (2017). Leveraging 35 years of *Pinus taeda* research in the southeastern US to constrain forest carbon cycle predictions: Regional data assimilation using ecosystem experiments. *Biogeosciences*, *14*(14), 3525–3547. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3525-2017
Thum, T., MacBean, N., Peylin, P., Bacour, C., Santaren, D., Longdoz, B., et al. (2017). The potential benefit of using forest biomass data in addition to carbon and water flux measurements to constrain ecosystem model parameters: Case studies at two temperate forest sites. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 234-235, 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.004

Tian, X., Minunno, F., Cao, T., Peltoniemi, M., Kalliokoski, T., & Mäkelä, A. (2020). Extending the range of applicability of the semi-empirical ecosystem flux model PRELES for varying forest types and climate. *Global Change Biology*, 26(5), 2923-2943. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14992

Torres-Rojas, L., Vergopolan, N., Herman, J. D., & Chaney, N. W. (2022). Towards an optimal representation of sub-grid heterogeneity in land surface models. *Water Resources Research*, 58(12), e2022WR032233. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022wr032233

Trudinger, C. M., Raupach, M. R., Rayner, P. J., Kattge, J., Liu, Q., Pak, B., et al. (2007). OptIC project: An intercomparison of optimization techniques for parameter estimation in terrestrial biogeochemical models. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, 112(G2), G02027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000367

Trugman, A. T., Anderegg, L. D. L., Shaw, J. D., & Anderegg, W. R. L. (2020). Trait velocities reveal that mortality has driven widespread coordinated shifts in forest hydraulic trait composition. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, 117(15), 8532-8538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917521117

Ustin, S. L., & Middleton, E. M. (2021). Current and near-term advances in Earth observation for ecological applications. *Ecological Processes*, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00255-4

van Oijen, M. (2017). Bayesian methods for quantifying and reducing uncertainty and error in forest models. *Current Forestry Reports*, 3(4), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0069-9

Varney, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Chadburn, S. E., Burke, E. J., & Cox, P. M. (2024). Soil carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models. *Biogeosciences*, 21(11), 2759-2776. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2759-2024

Verbeeck, H., Peylin, P., Bacour, C., Bonal, D., Steppe, K., & Ciais, P. (2011). Seasonal patterns of CO₂ fluxes in Amazon forests: Fusion of eddy covariance data and the ORCHIDEE model. *Journal of Geophysical Research*, 116(G2), G02018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001544

Vergopolan, N., Chaney, N. W., Beck, H. E., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Chan, S., & Wood, E. F. (2020). Combining hyper-resolution land surface modeling with SMAP brightness temperatures to obtain 30-m soil moisture estimates. *Remote Sensing of Environment*, 242, 111740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111740

Vergopolan, N., Chaney, N. W., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Beck, H. E., Ferguson, C. R., et al. (2021). SMAP-HydroBlocks, a 30-m satellite-based soil moisture dataset for the conterminous US. *Scientific Data*, 8(1), 264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01050-2

Vrugt, J. A. (2016). Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation. *Environmental Modelling & Software: With Environment Data News*, 75, 273-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013

Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J. F., Diks, C. G. H., Robinson, B. A., Hyman, J. M., & Higdon, D. (2009). Accelerating markov chain Monte Carlo Simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. *International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation*, 10(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273

Vuichard, N., Messina, P., Luyssaert, S., Guenet, B., Zaehle, S., Ghattas, J., et al. (2019). Accounting for carbon and nitrogen interactions in the global terrestrial ecosystem model ORCHIDEE (trunk version, rev 4999): Multi-scale evaluation of gross primary production. *Geoscientific Model Development*, 12(11), 4751-4779. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4751-2019

Waller, J. A., Dance, S. L., & Nichols, N. K. (2016). Theoretical insight into diagnosing observation error correlations using observation-minus-background and observation-minus-analysis statistics. *Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Royal Meteorological Society (Great Britain)*, 142(694), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2661

Wang, H., Huo, X., Duan, Q., Liu, R., & Luo, S. (2023). Uncertainty quantification for the Noah-MP land surface model: A case study in a grassland and sandy soil region. *Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres*, 128(20), e2023JD038556. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd038556

Wang, J., Jiang, F., Wang, H., Qiu, B., Wu, M., He, W., et al. (2021). Constraining global terrestrial gross primary productivity in a global carbon assimilation system with OCO-2 chlorophyll fluorescence data. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 304-305, 108424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108424

Wang, N., Zhang, D., Chang, H., & Li, H. (2020). Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network. *Journal of Hydrology*, 584, 124700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124700

Wang, Y.-P., Leuning, R., Cleugh, H. A., & Coppin, P. A. (2001). Parameter estimation in surface exchange models using nonlinear inversion: How many parameters can we estimate and which measurements are most useful? *Nonlinear parameter estimation. Global Change Biology*, 7(5), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00434.x

Watson-Parris, D. (2021). Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart. *Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences*, 379(2194), 20200098. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0098

Watson-Parris, D., Williams, A., Deaconu, L., & Stier, P. (2021). Model calibration using ESEM v1.1.0—An open, scalable Earth system emulator. *Geoscientific Model Development*, 14(12), 7659-7672. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021

Weng, E., & Luo, Y. (2011). Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics. *Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America*, 21(5), 1490-1505. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1394.1

Weng, E., Luo, Y., Gao, C., & Oren, R. (2011). Uncertainty analysis of forest carbon sink forecast with varying measurement errors: A data assimilation approach. *Journal of Plant Ecology*, 4(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr018

Wesselkamp, M., Chantry, M., Pinnington, E., Choulga, M., Boussetta, S., Kalweit, M., et al. (2024). Advances in land surface model-based forecasting: A comparative study of LSTM, gradient boosting, and feedforward neural network models as prognostic state emulators. *arXiv [physics.ao-ph]*. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16463

Whelan, M. E., Lennartz, S. T., Gimeno, T. E., Wehr, R., Wohlfahrt, G., Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Reviews and syntheses: Carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. *Biogeosciences*, 15(12), 3625-3657. https://doi.org/10.5194/fgb-15-3625-2018

Williams, M., Schwarz, P. A., Law, B. E., Irvine, J., & Kurpius, M. R. (2005). An improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation. *Global Change Biology*, 11(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00891.x

Williamson, D., Goldstein, M., Allison, L., Blaker, A., Challenor, P., Jackson, L., & Yamazaki, K. (2013). History matching for exploring and reducing climate model parameter space using observations and a large perturbed physics ensemble. *Climate Dynamics*, 41(7), 1703-1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1896-4

Wu, J.-L., Levine, M. E., Schneider, T., & Stuart, A. (2023). Learning about structural errors in models of complex dynamical systems. *arXiv [physics.comp-ph]*. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00035

Wu, M., Jiang, F., Scholze, M., Chen, D., Ju, W., Wang, S., et al. (2024). Regional responses of vegetation productivity to the two phases of ENSO. *Geophysical Research Letters*, 51(8), e2024GL108176. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108176
Wu, M., Scholze, M., Kaminski, T., Voßbeck, M., & Tagesson, T. (2020). Using SMOS soil moisture data combining CO₂ flask samples to constrain carbon fluxes during 2010–2015 within a Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS). *Remote Sensing of Environment*, 240, 111719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111719

Wu, M., Scholze, M., Voßbeck, M., Kaminski, T., & Hoffmann, G. (2018). Simultaneous assimilation of remotely sensed Soil Moisture and FAPAR for improving terrestrial carbon fluxes at multiple sites using CCDAS. *Remote Sensing*, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010027

Wutzler, T., & Carvalhais, N. (2014). Balancing multiple constraints in model-data integration: Weights and the parameter block approach. *Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences*, 119(11), 2112–2129. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jg002650

Xiao, J., Davis, K. J., Urban, N. M., & Keller, K. (2014). Uncertainty in model parameters and regional carbon fluxes: A model-data fusion approach. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 189–190, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.022

Xie, X., Meng, S., Liang, S., & Yao, Y. (2021). Physics-guided deep learning for rainfall-runoff modeling by considering extreme events and monotonic relationships. *Hydrology and Earth System Sciences*, 18(10), 3923–3936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127043

Xing, X., Wu, M., Zhang, W., Ju, W., Tagesson, T., He, W., et al. (2023). Modeling China's terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity with BEPS model: Parameter sensitivity analysis and model calibration. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 343, 109789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109789

Xiong, M., Liu, P., Cheng, L., Deng, C., Gui, Z., Zhang, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Identifying time-varying hydrological model parameters to improve simulation efficiency by the ensemble Kalman filter: A joint assimilation of streamflow and actual evapotranspiration. *Journal of Hydrology*, 568, 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.038

Xu, T., White, L., Hui, D., & Luo, Y. (2006). Probabilistic inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model: Analysis of uncertainty in parameter estimation and model prediction. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002468

Yang, T., Sun, F., Gentine, P., Liu, W., Wang, H., Yin, J., et al. (2019). Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations. *Environmental Research Letters*, 14(11), 114027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4d5e

Zaehle, S., Friedlingstein, P., & Friend, A. D. (2010). Terrestrial nitrogen feedbacks may accelerate future climate change: Carbon-nitrogen feedbacks affect climate. *Geophysical Research Letters*, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041345

Zaehle, S., Friend, A. D., Friedlingstein, P., Dentener, F., Peylin, P., & Schulz, M. (2010). Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 2. Role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance: Nitrogen effects on global C cycling. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 24(1), GB1006. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gb003522

Zhang, H., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Han, X., Vrugt, J. A., & Vereecken, H. (2017). State and parameter estimation of two land surface models using the ensemble Kalman filter and the particle filter. *Hydrology and Earth System Sciences*, 21(9), 4927–4958. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4927-2017

Zhang, J., Chung, H. S.-H., & Lo, W.-L. (2007). Clustering-based adaptive crossover and mutation probabilities for genetic algorithms. *IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation*, 11(3), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2006.880727

Zhao, H., & Kowalski, J. (2022). Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models. *Landslides*, 19(8), 2033–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01857-z

Zhao, W. L., Gentine, P., Reichstein, M., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., Wen, Y., et al. (2019). Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration. *Geophysical Research Letters*, 46(24), 14496–14507. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085291

Zhou, A., Hawkins, L., & Gentine, P. (2024). Proof-of-concept: Using ChatGPT to translate and modernize an Earth System model from fortran to Python/JAX. *arXiv [cs.DC]. arXiv*, http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00018

Zhu, H., Wu, M., Jiang, F., Vossbeck, M., Kaminski, T., Xing, X., et al. (2024). Assimilation of Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system–Nanjing University carbon assimilation system (NUCAS v1.0). *Geoscientific Model Development*, 17(16), 6337–6363. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024

Zhu, H., Xing, X., Wu, M., Ju, W., & Jiang, F. (2024). Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework. *Biogeosciences*, 21(16), 3735–3760. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024

Ziehn, T., Knorr, W., & Scholze, M. (2011). Investigating spatial differentiation of model parameters in a carbon cycle data assimilation system. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 25(2), GB2021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003886

Ziehn, T., Scholze, M., & Knorr, W. (2012). On the capability of Monte Carlo and adjoint inversion techniques to derive posterior parameter uncertainties in terrestrial ecosystem models: Comparison of inversion techniques. *Global Biogeochemical Cycles*, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004185

Zobitz, J. M., Moore, D. J. P., Quaife, T., Braswell, B. H., Bergeson, A., Anthony, J. A., & Monson, R. K. (2014). Joint data assimilation of satellite reflectance and net ecosystem exchange data constrains ecosystem carbon fluxes at a high-elevation subalpine forest. *Agricultural and Forest Meteorology*, 195–196, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.04.011

Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., Tietsche, S., Mogensen, K., & Mayer, M. (2019). The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis–analysis system for ocean and sea ice: A description of the system and assessment. *Ocean Science*, 15(3), 779–808. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-779-2019