185. Kirchner M, Mitter H, Schneider UA, Sommer M, Falkner K, Schmid E. Uncertainty concepts for integrated modeling - review and application for identifying uncertainties and uncertainty propagation pathways. *Environ Model Softw.* 2021;135:104905. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104905

186. Giacoletti A, Lucido GD, Mangano MC, Sarà G. Functional trait-based layers - an aquaculture siting tool for the Mediterranean Sea. *Aquaculture*. 2021;532:736081. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736081

187. Payne MR, Barange M, Cheung WWL, et al. Uncertainties in projecting climate-change impacts in marine ecosystems. *ICES J Mar Sci.* 2016;73(5):1272-1282. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv231

188. Tittensor DP, Eddy TD, Lotze HK, et al. A protocol for the intercomparison of marine fishery and ecosystem models: fish-MIP v1.0. *Geosci Model Dev.* 2018;11(4):1421-1442. doi:10.5194/GMD-11-1421-2018

189. Erickson A, Strigul N. A forest model intercomparison framework and application at two temperate forests along the East Coast of the United States. *Forests*. 2019;10(2):464-578. doi:10.1101/464578

190. Orr JC, Najjar RG, Aumont O, et al. Biogeochemical protocols and diagnostics for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP). *Geosci Model Dev.* 2017;10(6):2169-2199. doi:10.5194/gmd-10-2169-2017

191. Sarà G, Gouhier TC, Brigolin D, et al. Predicting shifting sustainability trade-offs in marine finfish aquaculture under climate change. *Glob Chang Biol.* 2018;24(8):3654-3665. doi:10.1111/gcb.14296

192. Føre M, Frank K, Norton T, et al. Precision fish farming: a new framework to improve production in aquaculture. *Biosyst Eng.* 2018; 173:176-193. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.10.014

193. Berckmans D. General introduction to precision livestock farming. *Anim Front.* 2017;7(1):6-11. doi:10.2527/af.2017.0102

194. Burke M, Grant J, Filgueira R, Stone T. Oceanographic processes control dissolved oxygen variability at a commercial Atlantic salmon farm: application of a real-time sensor network. *Aquaculture*. 2021; 533:736143. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736143

195. Svendsen E, Føre M, Økland F, et al. Heart rate and swimming activity as stress indicators for Atlantic salmon (*Salmo salar*). *Aquaculture*. 2021;531:735804. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735804

196. An D, Huang J, Wei Y. A survey of fish behaviour quantification indexes and methods in aquaculture. *Rev Aquac.* 2021;13(4):2169-2189. doi:10.1111/raq.12564

197. Mao JQ, Lee JHW, Choi KW. The extended Kalman filter for forecast of algal bloom dynamics. *Water Res.* 2009;43(17):4214-4224. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.012

198. Royer E, Faccenda F, Pastres R. Estimating oxygen consumption of rainbow trout (*Oncorhynchus mykiss*) in a raceway: a precision fish farming approach. *Aquac Eng.* 2021;92:102141. doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102141

199. Li D, Wang Z, Wu S, Miao Z, Du L, Duan Y. Automatic recognition methods of fish feeding behavior in aquaculture: a review. *Aquaculture*. 2020;528:735508. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735508

200. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Yarish C, Buschmann AH, Sousa-Pinto I. IMTA with *Gracilaria vermiculophylla*: productivity and nutrient removal performance of the seaweed in a land-based pilot scale system. *Aquaculture*. 2011;312(1-4):77-87. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.12.036

201. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, et al. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. *Aquaculture*. 2004;231(1-4):361-391. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.015

202. Jiang Z, Wang G, Fang J, Mao Y. Growth and food sources of Pacific oyster *Crassostrea gigas* integrated culture with sea bass *Lateolabrax japonicus* in Ailian Bay, China. *Aquac Int.* 2013;21(1):45-52. doi:10.1007/s10499-012-9531-7

203. Chopin T, Robinson S, Troell M, Neori A, Buschmann A, Fang J. Multitrophic integration for sustainable marine aquaculture. *Ecol*

Ecol. 2008;3:2463-2475. doi:10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00065-3

204. Reid GK, Chopin T, Robinson SMC, Azevedo P, Quinton M, Belyea E. Weight ratios of the kelps, *Alaria esculenta* and *Saccharina latissima*, required to sequester dissolved inorganic nutrients and supply oxygen for Atlantic salmon, *Salmo salar*, in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture systems. *Aquaculture*. 2013;408-409:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.05.004

205. Ren JS, Stenton-Dozey J, Plew DR, Fang J, Gall M. An ecosystem model for optimising production in integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems. *Ecol Model*. 2012;246:34-46. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel. 2012.07.020

206. Lamprianidou F, Telfer T, Ross LG. A model for optimization of the productivity and bioremediation efficiency of marine integrated multitrophic aquaculture. *Estuar Coast Shelf Sci.* 2015;164:253-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.045

207. Li M, Callier MD, Blancheton JP, et al. Bioremediation of fishpond effluent and production of microalgae for an oyster farm in an innovative recirculating integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system. *Aquaculture*. 2019;504:314-325. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.013

208. Galasso HL, Lefebvre S, Aliaume C, Sadoul B, Callier MD. Using the dynamic energy budget theory to evaluate the bioremediation potential of the polychaete *Hediste diversicolor* in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system. *Ecol Model*. 2020;437:109296. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109296

209. Levin PS, Fogarty MJ, Murawski SA, Fluharty D. Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. *PLoS Biol.* 2009;7(1):e1000014. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000014

210. UNEP. *Taking Steps toward Marine and Coastal Ecosystem-Based Management*. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 189. 2011:68.

211. Katsanevakis S, Stelzenmüller V, South A, et al. Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. *Ocean Coast Manag.* 2011;54(11):807-820. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.002

212. European Commission. *Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Strategic Guidelines for the Sustainable Development of EU Aquaculture (COM/2013/0229).* 2013.

213. Sanchez-Jerez P, Karakassis I, Massa F, et al. Aquaculture's struggle for space: the need for coastal spatial planning and the potential benefits of allocated zones for aquaculture (AZAs) to avoid conflict and promote sustainability. *Aquac Environ Interact.* 2016;8(1):41-54. doi:10.3354/aei00161

214. European Commission. *Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Strategic Guidelines for a More Sustainable and Competitive EU Aquaculture for the Period 2021 to 2030.* 2021.

215. GFCM. *Report of the WGSC-ShoCMed workshop on the definition and environmental monitoring within allowable zone of effect (AZE) of aquaculture activities within the Mediterranean Countries.* 2012.

216. Hargrave BT. Empirical relationships describing benthic impacts of salmon aquaculture. *Aquac Environ Interact.* 2010;1:33-46. doi:10.3354/aei00005

217. Keeley NB, Cromey CJ, Goodwin EO, Gibbs MT, Macleod CM. Predictive depositional modelling (DEPOMOD) of the interactive effect of current flow and resuspension on ecological impacts beneath salmon farms. *Aquac Environ Interact.* 2013;3(3):275-291. doi:10.3354/aei00068

218. Bravo F, Grant J. Modelling sediment assimilative capacity and organic carbon degradation efficiency at marine fish farms. *Aquac Environ Interact.* 2018;10:309-328. doi:10.3354/aei00267

219. Jusup M, Geček S, Legović T. Impact of aquacultures on the marine ecosystem: modelling benthic carbon loading over variable depth.
Ecol Model. 2007;200(3-4):459-466. doi:10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL. 2006.08.007

220. von Schuckmann K, Le Traon PY, Smith N, et al. Copernicus marine service ocean state report, issue 5. J Oper Oceanogr. 2021;14(S1):1-185. doi:10.1080/1755876X.2021.1946240

221. Butenschön M, Clark J, Aldridge JN, et al. ERSEM 15.06: a generic model for marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic levels. Geosci Model Dev. 2016;9(4):1293-1339. doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016

222. Vichi M, Lovato T, Butenschön M, et al. The Biogeochemical Flux Model (BFM): Equation Description and User Manual. BFM Version 5.2. BFM Report Series N. 1, Release 1.2, June 2020. 2020.

223. Ferreira JG, Saurel C, JD L e S, Nunes JP, Vazquez F. Modelling of interactions between inshore and offshore aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2014;426-427:154-164. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.030

224. Tsagaraki TM, Petihakis G, Tsiaras K, et al. Beyond the cage: ecosystem modelling for impact evaluation in aquaculture. Ecol Model. 2011;222(14):2512-2523. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.027

225. Bruggeman J, Bolding K. A general framework for aquatic biogeochemical models. Environ Model Softw. 2014;61:249-265. doi:10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2014.04.002

226. Galparsoro I, Murillas A, Pinarbasi K, et al. Global stakeholder vision for ecosystem-based marine aquaculture expansion from coastal to offshore areas. Rev Aquac. 2020;12(4):2061-2079. doi:10.1111/raq.12422

227. Saitoh S-I, Mugo R, Radiarta IN, et al. Some operational uses of satellite remote sensing and marine GIS for sustainable fisheries and aquaculture. ICES J Mar Sci. 2011;68(4):687-695. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsq190

228. Porporato EMD, Pastres R, Brigolin D. Site suitability for finfish marine aquaculture in the central Mediterranean Sea. Front Mar Sci. 2020;6:772. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00772

229. Gernez P, Barillé L, Leroux A, Mazeran C, Lucas A, Doxaran D. Remote sensing of suspended particulate matter in turbid oyster-farming ecosystems. J Geophys Res Ocean. 2014;119(10):7277-7294. doi:10.1002/2014JC010055

230. Gernez P, Doxaran D, Barillé L. Shellfish aquaculture from space: potential of Sentinel2 to monitor tide-driven changes in turbidity, chlorophyll concentration and oyster physiological response at the scale of an oyster farm. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:137. doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00137

231. ISO. Environmental management — life cycle assessment — requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. Published online 2006:46.

232. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, et al. In: Ministry of Housing SP and E (VROM), Centre of Environmental Science (CML), ed. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment. An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.

233. Bohnes FA, Hauschild MZ, Schlundt J, Laurent A. Life cycle assessments of aquaculture systems: a critical review of reported findings with recommendations for policy and system development. Rev Aquac. 2019;11(4):1061-1079. doi:10.1111/raq.12280

234. Aubin J. Life cycle assessment as applied to environmental choices regarding farmed or wild-caught fish. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour. 2013;8:1-10. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20138011

235. Parker R. Review of Life Cycle Assessment Research on Products Derived from Fisheries and Aquaculture: A Report for Seafish as Part of the Collective Action to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Seafood. Final Report. 2012.

236. Henriksson PJG, Troell M, Banks LK, et al. Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security. One Earth. 2021;4(9):1220-1232. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.009

237. Henriksson PJG, Mohan CV, Phillips MJ. Evaluation of different aquaculture feed ingredients in Indonesia using life cycle assessment. Indones J Life Cycle Assess Sustain. 2016;1(1):13-21. doi:10.5239/ijolcas.v1i1.4

238. Avadí A, Pelletier N, Aubin J, Ralite S, Núñez J, Fréon P. Comparative environmental performance of artisanal and commercial feed use in Peruvian freshwater aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2015;435:52-66. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.08.001

239. Hua K, Cobcroft JM, Cole A, et al. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth. 2019;1(3):316-329. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018

240. Froehlich HE, Jacobsen NS, Essington TE, Clavelle T, Halpern BS. Avoiding the ecological limits of forage fish for fed aquaculture. Nat Sustain. 2018;1(6):298-303. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0077-1

241. Boissy J, Aubin J, Drissi A, van der Werf HMG, Bell GJ, Kaushik SJ. Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales. Aquaculture. 2011;321(1-2):61-70. doi:10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2011.08.033

242. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P. Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture. 2007;272(1-4):399-416. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.06.024

243. Samuel-Fitwi B, Meyer S, Reckmann K, Schroeder JP, Schulz C. Aspiring for environmentally conscious aquafeed: comparative LCA of aquafeed manufacturing using different protein sources. J Clean Prod. 2013;52:225-233. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.031

244. Nhu TT, Schaubroeck T, Henriksson PJG, Bosma R, Sorgeloos P, Dewulf J. Environmental impact of non-certified versus certified (ASC) intensive Pangasius aquaculture in Vietnam, a comparison based on a statistically supported LCA. Environ Pollut. 2016;219:156-165. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.006

245. Smárason BÖ, Ögmundarson Ó, Árnason J, Björnsdóttir R, Davíðsdóttir B. Life cycle assessment of Icelandic arctic char fed three different feed types. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci. 2017;17(1):79-90. doi:10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_10

246. Glencross BD, Booth M, Allan GL. A feed is only as good as its ingredients - a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aquac Nutr. 2007;13(1):17-34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00450.x

247. Ghamkhar R, Hicks A. Comparative environmental impact assessment of aquafeed production: sustainability implications of forage fish meal and oil free diets. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;161:104849. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104849

## SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of the article at the publisher's website.

**How to cite this article:** Chary K, Brigolin D, Callier MD. Farm-scale models in fish aquaculture – An overview of methods and applications. Rev Aquac. 2022;14(4):2122-2157. doi:10.1111/raq.12695