# A Novel Method to Describe Early Offspring Body Mass Index (BMI) Trajectories and to Study Its Determinants

Sophie Carles, Marie-Aline Charles, Anne Forhan, Rémy Slama, Barbara

Heude, Jérémie Botton

► To cite this version:

Sophie Carles, Marie-Aline Charles, Anne Forhan, Rémy Slama, Barbara Heude, et al.. A Novel Method to Describe Early Offspring Body Mass Index (BMI) Trajectories and to Study Its Determinants. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11 (6), pp.e0157766. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157766. hal-03403460

HAL Id: hal-03403460

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03403460

Submitted on 26 Oct 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

RESEARCH ARTICLE

# A Novel Method to Describe Early Offspring Body Mass Index (BMI) Trajectories and to Study Its Determinants

Sophie Carles¹,²,³*, Marie-Aline Charles¹,², Anne Forhan¹,², Rémy Slama⁴,⁵, Barbara Heude¹,², Jérémie Botton¹,³,⁶, EDEN mother child study group¹

¹ Early determinants of the child's health and development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, UMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Paris, F-75014 France, ² Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, ³ Univ Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France, ⁴ Team of Environmental Epidemiology applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, Inserm, CNRS and University Grenoble Alpes joint research center, Institute of Advanced Biosciences, U1209, Grenoble, France, ⁵ Grenoble Alpes University, Institute of Advanced Biosciences, U1209, Grenoble, France, ⁶ Laboratoire de biomathématique, Faculté de Pharmacie, Univ Paris-Sud, Châtenay-Malabry, F-92290, France

¶ Membership of the EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group is listed in the Acknowledgments.

* sophie.carles@inserm.fr

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Carles S, Charles M-A, Forhan A, Slama R, Heude B, Botton J, et al. (2016) A Novel Method to Describe Early Offspring Body Mass Index (BMI) Trajectories and to Study Its Determinants. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157766. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766

**Editor:** Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes, INIA, SPAIN

**Received:** January 11, 2016

**Accepted:** April 18, 2016

**Published:** June 21, 2016

**Copyright:** © 2016 Carles et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** The data underlying the findings cannot be made freely available because of ethical and legal restrictions. This is because the present study includes an important number of variables that, together, could be used to re-identify the participants based on a few key characteristics and then be used to have access to other personal data. Therefore, the French ethical authority strictly forbids making such data freely available. However, they can be obtained upon request from the EDEN steering committee. Readers may contact etude. eden@inserm.fr to request the data.

## Abstract

### Background

Accurately characterizing children's body mass index (BMI) trajectories and studying their determinants is a statistical challenge. There is a need to identify early public health measures for obesity prevention. We describe a method that allows studies of the determinants of height, weight and BMI growth up to five years of age. We illustrated this method using maternal smoking during pregnancy as one of the early-life factors that is potentially involved in prenatal programming of obesity.

### Methods

Individual height and weight trajectories were fitted using the Jenss-Bayley model on 28,381 and 30,515 measurements, respectively, from 1,666 children to deduce BMI trajectories. We assessed global associations between smoking and growth trajectories and cross-sectional associations at specific ages.

### Results

Children exposed in late pregnancy had a 0.24 kg/m² (95% confidence interval: 0.07, 0.41) higher BMI at 5 years of age compared with non-exposed children. Although the BMIs of children exposed during late pregnancy became significantly higher compared with those of non-exposed children from 2 years onwards, the trajectories began to diverge during the first weeks of life.
**Funding:** The authors received no specific funding for this work.

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

**Abbreviations:** CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; EDEN, Etude des Déterminants pré et postnatals précoces du développement et de la santé de l'Enfant.

## Conclusion

Our method is relevant for studies on the relationships between individual-level exposures and the dynamics and shapes of BMI growth during childhood, including key features such as instantaneous growth velocities and the age or BMI value at the BMI infancy peak that benefit from the monotonic pattern of height and weight growth.

## Introduction

Relationships between patterns of growth in infancy and childhood and the risk of later chronic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases have been well described [1-3]. Many studies are now focusing on the determinants of growth. They are mainly studied at one or few time points, but there is a need to analyse their association more globally with longitudinal pattern of growth of children for a better understanding of their consequences. The paucity of longitudinal studies and the lack of relevant methodologies do not allow the precise characterization of the pattern of growth of children and the identification of when the difference in the body mass index (BMI) between different groups emerges.

In a broad context, group- and individual-based approaches are the main methods used to model BMI in childhood. Group-based approaches consider population heterogeneity in trajectories to identify subgroups sharing similar growth patterns [4,5], but the relevance of the number of groups chosen by the analyst can be criticized [6]. Individual-based approaches provide individual BMI trajectories, but the non-monotonic shape of the BMI may require complex modeling methods. Models using (fractional) polynomials [7,8] require the determination of the relevant polynomial order and combination of power(s). High order polynomials better fit the data but often exhibit a poor fit at the extremes [8]. Spline models [9,10] are more flexible, but the number and localization of the knots need to be chosen with some degree of arbitrariness. Moreover, these methods do not provide biologically interpretable parameters for growth.

We describe a method that allows studies of the determinants of an offspring's height, weight and BMI growth up to five years of age based on non-linear modeling of the individual height and weight growth curves [11]. We chose to illustrate this method with maternal smoking during pregnancy as one of the early-life factors that is potentially involved in the prenatal programming of obesity. Indeed, maternal smoking during pregnancy has been consistently associated with an increased risk of obesity in adulthood [12]. In addition, there is growing evidence that this association appears in childhood, but uncertainties remain regarding the timing and the existence of critical time-windows of exposure during pregnancy. We show how our method (later called "indirect modeling, IM") provides insights into the timing of the emergence of potential BMI differences in early life.

## Materials and Methods

### Population

EDEN is an ongoing French mother-child cohort established to assess pre- and early postnatal determinants of child health and development [13]. Between 2003 and 2006, 2,002 pregnant women were recruited prior to 24 weeks of gestation defined by the date of the last menstrual period in the Nancy and Poitiers hospitals. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, personal history of diabetes, illiteracy, and intention to deliver outside the university hospital or to move outside the region within 3 years. Spouses willing to take part were invited to participate;
the enrolled pregnant women had to complete a questionnaire and attend a clinical examination where their height was recorded by research midwives. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents for themselves and from both parents for the child after delivery. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Kremlin-Bicêtre and declared to the National Committee for Processed Data and Freedom.

Ninety-five enrolled women left the study due to miscarriages, *in utero* deaths or discontinuation of pregnancy for medical reasons. Among the 1,907 enrolled children, 1,666 had more than one postnatal length/height and weight measurement and complete data on potential confounders; these children were included in the analyses.

## Maternal smoking

During the first visit with the research midwives (between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation), the mothers reported their current smoking status (used to characterize the 2^nd^ trimester status), daily cigarette consumption and smoking habits at the beginning of pregnancy (used for the 1^st^ trimester status). After delivery, similar information for smoking at the end of the 3^rd^ trimester of pregnancy was collected by the research midwives (used for the 3^rd^ trimester status). We investigated differences between “Non-smoking mothers”, “Smokers exclusively in the 1^st^ trimester” and “Smokers in late pregnancy” (i.e., smoking at least during the second and/or third trimesters). Additionally, we calculated the average daily number of cigarettes in the second and third trimesters.

## Anthropometric measurements

The child's birthweight, daily weights on days 1 to 5 and birth length were extracted from the obstetric records. Length/height and weight postnatal measurements were collected from routine checks via mailed questionnaires and during the study's clinical visits at 1, 3 and 5 years. Mothers reported lengths/heights and weights recorded by their child's health practitioners on personal child health records in the 4 preceding months (4-month, 8-month, 1-year questionnaires) or trimesters (2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year questionnaires). At the 1-year visit, mothers were weighed (to the nearest 0.1 kg) alone and holding their child and the child's weight was determined by subtracting the two measurements. The child's weight was directly measured at the 3- and 5-year visits. The height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm.

The median [min-max] numbers of measurements were 18 [2–31] and 19 [2–32] for height and weight, respectively (S1 Table). Among the enrolled children, 1,203 (72%) and 1,208 (73%) had at least one height and weight measurement after four years, respectively.

## Potential confounders

During the first visit, the maternal height was measured to the nearest 0.2 cm by a midwife and the mothers reported their pre-pregnancy weight, age and education level. Their pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated as weight (in kilograms) for measured height (in meters) squared. We determined the overweight (including obesity) status as a BMI ≥25 kg/m². Breast-feeding data were extracted from the medical records during the hospital maternity stay, at discharge and through the mothers' self-administered postnatal mailed questionnaires at 4 and 8 months and at 1 and 2 years. The duration of any (exclusive or partial) breast-feeding practices was calculated [14] to identify children breast-fed less than 3 months or longer.

## Growth trajectory modeling

Using a recently proposed methodology [11], the individual weight and height trajectories were estimated using the non-linear Jenss-Bayley equation through a mixed effects modeling
approach including variance modeling to take heteroscedasticity into account (S1 File). By adding individual random effects in each equation parameter, a set of parameters was used to characterize each child's growth trajectory. To bypass neonatal weight loss not correctly fitted by the model, birthweight measurements were excluded and the minimal weight in the first four days of life was selected for each child. The models were fitted using the 'SAEMIX' package in the R software [15].

Given their non-monotonic shape in early childhood, the BMI trajectories were not directly modeled but were calculated from the modeled height and weight [11]. The mean population and individual BMI trajectories were determined using the height and weight equations (S1 File).

## Statistical analysis

Whether the child's global weight or length/height growth shape differed according to the maternal smoking status was assessed using the "one-step" method. Associations between maternal smoking and anthropometric parameters at birth, the predicted height, weight and BMI, their corresponding velocities at specific ages, and age/BMI at the BMI infancy peak were assessed using the "two-step" method (Fig 1). The analyses were performed on R v3.0 and *P* values <0.05 were considered significant.

**One-step approach.** Gender and potential confounders (maternal education level, age, BMI, breast-feeding duration and recruitment center) were introduced as fixed effects in the length/height and weight models. The general form of the length/height model is given

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 1.** Levels of the “One-step” and “Two-step” Modeling Methods of Growth for Children from the EDEN study aged from birth to 5 years.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766.g001
(Eq 1A) and the form decomposing the individual parameters is also detailed (Eq 1B).

$$ Height_{i,j} = \exp(A_{H_i}) + \exp(B_{H_i}) * t_{i,j} + \exp(C_{H_i}) * (1 - \exp(-\exp(D_{H_i}) * t_{i,j})) + e_{i,j} \quad (1A) $$

$$ Height_{i,j} = \exp(\mu_{A_H} + \beta_{A_H} * Z + u_{A_{H_i}}) + \exp(\mu_{B_H} + \beta_{B_H} * Z + u_{B_{H_i}}) * t_{i,j} + \exp(\mu_{C_H} + \beta_{C_H} * Z + u_{C_{H_i}}) \quad (1B) $$

$$ * (1 - \exp(-\exp(\mu_{D_H} + \beta_{D_H} * Z + u_{D_{H_i}}) * t_{i,j})) + e_{i,j} $$

$Height_{i,j}$ describes the height (cm) of child i at time $t_{i,j}$ (days), $exp(A_H)$ describes the birth length, $exp(B_H)$ describes the growth velocity beyond two years, $C_H$ is the spurt of growth in the first months of life and $D_H$ is the curvature of the trajectories in the first age period. The parameter definitions are illustrated in Fig 2 and in S1 File (Fig A).

Fig 2 describes the influence of each of the parameters (and more specifically their increase) (Table A in S1 File provides decile values) on the growth of the global shape. $\beta_{A_H}$, $\beta_{B_H}$, $\beta_{C_H}$, and $\beta_{D_H}$, $\beta_{AH}$, $\beta_{BH}$, $\beta_{CH}$, $\beta_{DH}$ represent covariate effects from vector Z (maternal smoking status during pregnancy; potential confounders) on $A_H$, $B_H$, $C_H$, and $D_H$, respectively. $u_{A_H}$, $u_{B_H}$, $u_{C_H}$,

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig 2. Weight Growth Trajectories from birth to 5 years by deciles of weight growth parameters (Ai, Bi, Ci and Di) in Children of the EDEN Study, France, 2003–2012.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766.g002
and $u_{DH}$, $u_{AH}$, $u_{BH}$, $u_{CH}$, $u_{DH}$ are individual random effects of $A_H$, $B_H$, $C_H$, and $D_H$ respectively. $e_{ij}$ is the residual error. $\mu_{AH}$, $\mu_{BH}$, $\mu_{CH}$, and $\mu_{DH}$ represent the fixed effects of $A_H$, $B_H$, $C_H$, and $D_H$, respectively, for children with $Z=0$. The weight was modeled similarly. As the first measurement is the minimal weight within the first 4 days, $A_W$ corresponds to the extrapolation of the birth weight without considering neonatal weight loss; thus, the values are lower than the observed measurements. Longitudinal associations between maternal smoking and the length/height and weight trajectories were assessed through comparison of the nested models using likelihood ratio tests.

The BMI of individual $i$ at time $j$ was predicted as $BMI_{i,j} = \frac{Weight_{i,j}}{(Height_{i,j}/100)^2}$ with the weight expressed in kg.

**Two-step approach.** Individual height, weight and BMI were predicted at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 5 years using individual equations fitted separately for boys and girls without covariates. The individual height (Eq 2), weight and BMI (Eq 3) velocities were calculated at these ages by calculating the first-derivative equations.

$$HeightVelocity_{i,j} = \exp(B_{H_i}) + \exp(C_{H_i} + D_{H_i} - \exp(D_{H_i}) * t_{i,j}) \quad (2)$$

$$BMIVelocity_{i,j} = \frac{WeightVelocity_{i,j} * \left(\frac{Height_{i,j}}{100}\right)^2 - 2 * \frac{Height_{i,j}}{100} * \frac{HeightVelocity_{i,j}}{100} * Weight_{i,j}}{\left(\frac{Height_{i,j}}{100}\right)^4} \quad (3)$$

The individual daily BMI velocities were calculated from birth to five years of age. The age at the BMI infancy peak was the time point when the BMI velocity signs changed ($BMIVelocity_{i,j}/BMIVelocity_{i,j+1} < 0$); the BMI at the BMI infancy peak was calculated for this age. The BMI infancy peaks identified after 2 years of age were excluded from the analyses after the graphical examination of trajectories (n = 49).

Associations between the smoking status and measured birth length/weight, predicted weight, length/height and BMI at the selected ages as well as the age and BMI at the BMI infancy peak were assessed using multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounders.

## Complementary analysis

To explore the dose-response relationship between maternal smoking in late pregnancy and the child's growth, the analyses were repeated considering the average number of cigarettes smoked daily in the second and third trimesters as the main exposure.

To evaluate the association between postnatal smoking and growth, we compared the children's growth from pre- and postnatal non-smoking mothers and non-smoking fathers to the children from non-smoking mothers during pregnancy that (re-)started smoking after birth or whose father smoked postnatally.

## Sensitivity analyses

The analyses were repeated after excluding children born before 37 weeks of gestation to assess any confounding by preterm children. To assess the potential selection bias caused by missing length/height or weight data, the analyses were repeated after excluding children lacking measurements after 4 years of age. To discuss potential differences with other BMI modeling approaches, we replicated the 2-step approach using fractional polynomials and splines. Finally, we report analyses on anthropometric measurements from clinical visits at 1, 3 and 5 years.
# Results

## Population characteristics

Among the enrolled mothers, 24% smoked at least once during pregnancy: 132 (7.9%) exclusively in the first trimester and 275 (16.5%) also during the second and/or third trimester(s) (Table 1). These prevalences were similar for mothers with missing data on confounders (8.5% and 16.5%, respectively).

Maternal smoking was inversely associated with the age at delivery, education level and breast feeding initiation and duration. Smokers in late pregnancy delivered neonates with smaller birth lengths and weights than non-smokers (Table 1).

<table><caption>Table 1. Children (n = 1,666) and Parental Characteristics by Maternal Smoking Status during pregnancy from the EDEN study, 2003–2012.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="2">No smoking<br>(n = 1259, 75.57%)</th><th colspan="3">Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester<br>(n = 132, 7.92%)</th><th colspan="3">Late pregnancy (n = 275, 16.51%)</th></tr><tr><th>%</th><th>Mean (SD)</th><th>%</th><th>Mean (SD)</th><th>P Value<sup>a</sup></th><th>%</th><th>Mean (SD)</th><th>P Value<sup>b</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Maternal Characteristics</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td></td><td>30.1 (4.6)</td><td></td><td>28.5 (5)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td></td><td>28.5 (5.4)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Height, cm</td><td></td><td>163.6 (6.1)</td><td></td><td>163.7 (6)</td><td>0.85</td><td></td><td>163.3 (6.4)</td><td>0.54</td></tr><tr><td>Weight, kg</td><td></td><td>62.5 (12.7)</td><td></td><td>60.5 (12.1)</td><td>0.08</td><td></td><td>61.6 (12.7)</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>BMI<sup>c</sup>, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td>22.2 (14.9–60.4)</td><td></td><td>21.4 (15.6–38)</td><td>0.02</td><td></td><td>21.8 (14–43)</td><td>0.28</td></tr><tr><td>Overweight or Obese</td><td>25.9</td><td></td><td>23.5</td><td></td><td>0.09</td><td>26.6</td><td></td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Center (Poitiers)</td><td>45.9</td><td></td><td>50.8</td><td></td><td>0.29</td><td>53.1</td><td></td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Education level</strong></td></tr><tr><td>High school or less</td><td>38.8</td><td></td><td>51.5</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>69.8</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>2-year university degree</td><td>23.8</td><td></td><td>20.4</td><td></td><td></td><td>15.6</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3-year university degree</td><td>37.4</td><td></td><td>28</td><td></td><td></td><td>14.6</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Primiparity</td><td>43.8</td><td></td><td>56.8</td><td></td><td>0.004</td><td>43.3</td><td></td><td>0.86</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Number of cigarettes per day</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1<sup>st</sup> Trimester</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6.0 (1–35)</td><td></td><td></td><td>8.0 (1–40)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2<sup>nd</sup> Trimester</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>5.0 (1–20)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3<sup>rd</sup> Trimester</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>5.0 (1–25)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Paternal Characteristics</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td>24.8 (15.8–40.8)</td><td></td><td>24.5 (18–35.2)</td><td>0.12</td><td></td><td>24.3 (17.6–35.5)</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td>Smoking status</td><td>29.7</td><td></td><td>62.1</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>75.1</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Child Characteristics</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Male Sex</td><td>52.3</td><td></td><td>49.2</td><td></td><td>0.51</td><td>51.6</td><td></td><td>0.85</td></tr><tr><td>Gestational age, weeks<sup>c</sup></td><td></td><td>40 (28–42)</td><td></td><td>40 (34–42)</td><td>0.92</td><td></td><td>39 (30–42)</td><td>0.36</td></tr><tr><td>Birth length, cm</td><td></td><td>49.71 (2.31)</td><td></td><td>49.43 (2.02)</td><td>0.19</td><td></td><td>49.03 (2.39)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Birth weight, g</td><td></td><td>3311 (507)</td><td></td><td>3316 (455)</td><td>0.92</td><td></td><td>3157 (486)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Breast feeding Yes/No</td><td>76.9</td><td></td><td>71.2</td><td></td><td>0.14</td><td>61.8</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Breast feeding ≥3 months</td><td>50.2</td><td></td><td>40.9</td><td></td><td>0.04</td><td>26.9</td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Breast-feeding duration in breast-fed child, months</td><td></td><td>4 (0.2–13)</td><td></td><td>3 (0.2–13)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td></td><td>2 (0.2–13)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Prematurity</td><td>5.8</td><td></td><td>2.3</td><td></td><td>0.09</td><td>4.4</td><td></td><td>0.35</td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation

<footnote>a, bComparison between characteristics of mothers who smoked exclusively during the 1st trimester, their children and partners and those of non-smokers using the X², t tests or Man-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests as appropriate</footnote>

<footnote>cMedian (min-max) presented due to left or right skew</footnote>
<table><caption>Table 2. Mean differences in Height and Weight Model Parameters in each Maternal smoking category and the reference category (No smoking) using the (One-step Method)ª in Children aged 0–5 years in the EDEN Study, 2003–2012.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Outcomes</th><th colspan="2">A</th><th colspan="2">B</th><th colspan="2">C</th><th colspan="2">D</th><th rowspan="3">Global Pvalue</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Birth length</th><th colspan="2">Growth Velocity</th><th colspan="2">Spurt of Growth</th><th colspan="2">Curvature Degree</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Extrapolation of Birth weight</th><th colspan="2">-Childhood-</th><th colspan="2">-First Months-</th><th colspan="2">-First Months-</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>βA</th><th>CI 95%</th><th>βB</th><th>CI 95%</th><th>βC</th><th>CI 95%</th><th>βD</th><th>CI 95%</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Height</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>-0.003</td><td>[-0.012,0.005]</td><td>0.028</td><td>[-0.001,0.057]</td><td>-0.022</td><td>[-0.057,0.013]</td><td>0.074*</td><td>[0.010,0.137]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>-0.015*</td><td>[-0.021,-0.008]</td><td>0.022</td><td>[-0.001,0.046]</td><td>0.004</td><td>[-0.024,0.031]</td><td>0.038</td><td>[-0.011,0.087]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>0.008</td><td>[-0.025,0.041]</td><td>-0.004</td><td>[-0.050,0.042]</td><td>0.016</td><td>[-0.036,0.068]</td><td>-0.023</td><td>[-0.099,0.054]</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>-0.037*</td><td>[-0.062,-0.012]</td><td>0.035</td><td>[-0.001,0.071]</td><td>0.008</td><td>[-0.032,0.048]</td><td>0.022</td><td>[-0.037,0.081]</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index, CI, confidence interval.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766.t002

## Growth

The ‘one-step’ method assesses associations between maternal smoking and length/height or weight trajectories as a whole and the effects on the four-specific Jenss-Bayley model parameters for length/height and weight (Table 2).

The ‘two-step’ method shows associations between maternal smoking and predicted height, weight, and BMI and their corresponding velocities at specific ages (Table 3).

The overall fits of the models were good (Figs A and B in S2 File). Although the fit was good for weight because no trend was observed among the residuals across time, the model fit the data somewhat less adequately for height. However, the distribution of the BMI residuals over time and the individual fitted trajectories illustrated the good ability of the indirect modeling to fit the BMI data (Figs A and C in S2 File).

**Length/height growth.** Fig 3B1 illustrates the height growth curve by smoking categories for children with given socio-demographic characteristics, and Fig 3B2 shows the differences in the mean height trajectories between children from non-smoking mothers and children from mothers who smoked exclusively during the 1st trimester or until late pregnancy.

The child length/height trajectories differed among children exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy and children from non-smokers (p<0.001).

Compared with no maternal smoking, smoking during the 1st trimester exclusively was associated with lower C and significantly higher D parameters. This finding illustrates a faster early length growth for a short period of time (up to 3 months). These children also exhibited faster height growth velocities at 5 years compared to the children from non-smokers, although their height was not significantly greater at these ages (Table 3).

Compared with no maternal smoking, maternal smoking during late pregnancy was associated with a 0.015 lower A parameter (95% CI: -0.021, -0.008). This difference represented a 0.63 cm shorter length at birth in children whose mothers smoked during late pregnancy compared to children born to non-smoker mothers.

Compared to children from non-smokers, children whose mothers smoked during late pregnancy had a lower average length from birth to 6 months. They exhibited a significantly faster length growth velocity immediately after birth (higher D parameter compared to

<footnote>ªAdjusted for maternal education level, BMI and age at delivery; breast-feeding duration; recruitment center; child's gender.</footnote>

<footnote>*P<0.05.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 3.** A1) Weight (kg), B1) Height (cm), and C1) BMI (kg/m²): Mean Trajectories in each category of Maternal Smoking for children from the EDEN Study aged from birth to 5 years. A2) Weight (kg), B2) Height (cm), and C2) BMI (kg/m²): Differences in Trajectories between each category of Maternal Smoking and the Reference Category (No Smoking) for children from the EDEN Study aged from birth to 5 years. Mean Trajectories are illustrated for Boys breastfed less than 3 months with 30 year-old non-overweight mothers with a high-school education or less born in Poitiers.</figcaption></figure>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766.g003

children from non-smokers) up to 6 months (Table 3). These children seemed to catch up to the heights of children from non-smokers only at the end of the study period (Table 3).

**Weight growth.** Similar to height, Fig 3A1 illustrates the weight growth curve by smoking categories, and Fig 3A2 shows the differences in the mean weight trajectories between children from non-smoking mothers and children from mothers who smoked exclusively during the 1st trimester or until late pregnancy.

Maternal smoking during pregnancy was significantly associated with a change in the global weight trajectory (p = 0.03).

The average weight trajectory of children whose mothers smoked during the 1st trimester exclusively was similar to that of children from non-smokers (Table 2).

However, children born to mothers who smoked during late pregnancy had weight trajectories that differed from the children of non-smokers. These children had birthweights that were 120 grams lower and tended to have a higher D parameter that was in line with faster growth in the beginning of life. Using the two-step approach, we found that their weight growth was significantly higher at one and two years (0.009 and 0.006 kg/month, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.016 and 0.001, 0.011, respectively) and higher at 4 and 5 years without reaching statistical significance. The higher B parameter in this subgroup was in line with this higher weight growth during childhood. Thus, they surpassed the weight of unexposed children at approximately 2 years
<table><caption>Table 3. Mean Differences in Predicted Anthropometric Outcomes from Birth to 5 Years in each Maternal Smoking Category and the Reference Category (No Smoking)ª (Two-step method).</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="2">Birth</th><th colspan="2">3 months</th><th colspan="2">6 months</th><th colspan="2">1 year</th><th colspan="2">2 years</th><th colspan="2">4 years</th><th colspan="2">5 years</th></tr><tr><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th><th>β</th><th>95% CI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Length/Height, cm</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>-0.24</td><td>[-0.63,0.15]</td><td>0.16</td><td>[-0.22,0.53]</td><td>0.23</td><td>[-0.16,0.62]</td><td>0.18</td><td>[-0.24,0.60]</td><td>0.06</td><td>[-0.45,0.57]</td><td>0.20</td><td>[-0.46,0.87]</td><td>0.35</td><td>[-0.40,1.11]</td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>-0.63*</td><td>[-0.92,-0.33]</td><td>-0.40*</td><td>[-0.68,-0.12]</td><td>-0.30*</td><td>[-0.59,0.00]</td><td>-0.23</td><td>[-0.55,0.08]</td><td>-0.19</td><td>[-0.57,0.19]</td><td>-0.06</td><td>[-0.56,0.44]</td><td>0.02</td><td>[-0.55,0.58]</td></tr><tr><td>Weight, g</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>28</td><td>[-61,117]</td><td>15</td><td>[-98,129]</td><td>39</td><td>[-98,176]</td><td>75</td><td>[-95,245]</td><td>101</td><td>[-119,321]</td><td>125</td><td>[-206,455]</td><td>137</td><td>[-261,535]</td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>-120*</td><td>[-187,-54]</td><td>-53</td><td>[-138,33]</td><td>-22</td><td>[-125,81]</td><td>33</td><td>[-95,161]</td><td>121</td><td>[-44,287]</td><td>249*</td><td>[1,498]</td><td>307*</td><td>[8,606]</td></tr><tr><td>BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>0.25</td><td>[-0.01,0.52]</td><td>-0.05</td><td>[-0.27,0.17]</td><td>-0.04</td><td>[-0.27,0.19]</td><td>0.03</td><td>[-0.19,0.26]</td><td>0.10</td><td>[-0.12,0.31]</td><td>0.04</td><td>[-0.17,0.25]</td><td>0.00</td><td>[-0.22,0.22]</td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>-0.16</td><td>[-0.37,0.04]</td><td>0.08</td><td>[-0.09,0.24]</td><td>0.11</td><td>[-0.07,0.28]</td><td>0.16</td><td>[-0.01,0.33]</td><td>0.23*</td><td>[0.07,0.39]</td><td>0.25*</td><td>[0.09,0.41]</td><td>0.24*</td><td>[0.07,0.41]</td></tr><tr><td>Height velocities, cm/month</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>0.049*</td><td>[0.002,0.096]</td><td>0.007</td><td>[-0.023,0.036]</td><td>-0.015</td><td>[-0.039,0.009]</td><td>-0.003</td><td>[-0.015,0.009]</td><td>0.011</td><td>[0.000,0.023]</td><td>0.013*</td><td>[0.001,0.025]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>0.049*</td><td>[0.013,0.084]</td><td>0.022*</td><td>[0.000,0.044]</td><td>0.005</td><td>[-0.013,0.022]</td><td>0.004</td><td>[-0.005,0.013]</td><td>0.006</td><td>[-0.002,0.015]</td><td>0.006</td><td>[-0.003,0.015]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weight velocities, kg/month</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>0.007</td><td>[-0.012,0.026]</td><td>0.008</td><td>[-0.005,0.022]</td><td>0.004</td><td>[-0.005,0.013]</td><td>0.001</td><td>[-0.005,0.008]</td><td>0.001</td><td>[-0.006,0.008]</td><td>0.001</td><td>[-0.006,0.008]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>0.011</td><td>[-0.003,0.026]</td><td>0.010</td><td>[-0.001,0.020]</td><td>0.009*</td><td>[0.002,0.016]</td><td>0.006*</td><td>[0.001,0.011]</td><td>0.005</td><td>[0.0,0.01]</td><td>0.005</td><td>[0.000,0.010]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BMI velocities, kg/m<sup>2</sup>/month</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td>-0.068*</td><td>[-0.135,-0.001]</td><td>0.011</td><td>[-0.012,0.035]</td><td>0.011</td><td>[-0.001,0.023]</td><td>0.001</td><td>[-0.005,0.006]</td><td>-0.003</td><td>[-0.007,0.001]</td><td>-0.003</td><td>[-0.007,0.000]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td>0.023</td><td>[-0.028,0.073]</td><td>0.009</td><td>[-0.009,0.026]</td><td>0.009</td><td>[0.000,0.017]</td><td>0.003</td><td>[-0.001,0.008]</td><td>0.000</td><td>[-0.003,0.003]</td><td>-0.001</td><td>[-0.003,0.002]</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Age at BMI peak<sup>b</sup>, days</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BMI at BMI peak<sup>b</sup>, kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exclusively the 1<sup>st</sup> trimester</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Late pregnancy</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index, CI, confidence interval.

ªAdjusted for maternal education level, BMI and age at delivery, breast-feeding duration, recruitment center, and child's gender.

ᵇAnalyses restricted to subjects with valid data for age and BMI at the BMI peak (identifiable BMI peak and BMI peak before 732 days). The number of children available for the analysis was 1,617.

*P<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157766.t003
and continued to gain more weight thereafter. At ages 4 and 5 years, they had a 249 gram (95% CI: 1, 498) and 307 gram (95% CI: 8, 606) higher mean weight, respectively, compared to children born to non-smokers.

**BMI growth.** Fig 3C1 illustrates the resulting BMI growth curve by smoking categories, and Fig 3C2 shows the differences in the mean BMI trajectories between children from non-smoking mothers and children from mothers who smoked exclusively during the 1st trimester or until late pregnancy.

Children born to non-smokers and to mothers who smoked during the 1st trimester exclusively had quite similar mean BMI trajectories. Smoking during the 1st trimester exclusively was not associated with any age-predicted BMI. The mean BMI trajectory of children from smokers in late pregnancy surpassed the trajectory of the unexposed children in the first couple of months. Although their ages at the BMI infancy peak were comparable, maternal smoking in late pregnancy was associated with a non-significant BMI increase at the BMI infancy peak (0.12, 95% CI: -0.05, 0.29). At 2 years of age, these children had a significantly higher BMI (0.23 kg/m²). This difference reached 0.24 kg/m² at 5 years.

## Dose response

A dose-response relationship between maternal smoking in late pregnancy and growth characteristics (Tables A and B in S3 File) was observed. The height and weight A parameters were significantly negatively associated and height D was positively associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day. A five cigarette per day increase was associated with a 0.39 cm (95% CI: -0.58, -0.20) and 0.21 cm (95% CI: -0.40, -0.02) lower length at birth and at 6 months, respectively, a 82 gram lower measured birthweight, and a 155 gram (95% CI: -1, 312) and 188 gram (95% CI: 0, 376) higher predicted weight at 4 and 5 years, respectively. These results were in line with a 0.018 higher B parameter (95% CI: -0.005, 0.042).

## Sensitivity analysis (S4 File)

The exclusion of the 88 preterm children (Table A in S4 File) and the restriction of the analysis to 1,211 children with data beyond 4 years of age did not change the results. The weights, heights and BMIs of children exposed only postnatally were comparable to these measurements from the non-exposed children (Table B in S4 File). Associations between the predicted BMIs at different time points and maternal smoking status gave close results regardless of the modeling method used (Table C in S4 File). For the subsample of children attending the clinical visits at 1, 3 and 5 years, the associations with maternal smoking status were comparable for the measurements from clinical visits or the model-predicted data (Table D in S4 File).

## Discussion

Our approach provides mutually complementary methods to accurately characterize the determinants of growth in children from birth to five years. For the example of maternal smoking during pregnancy, we showed that although the BMI of children exposed during late pregnancy became significantly higher from 2 years of age onwards compared to unexposed children, their BMI trajectories started to diverge very early in infancy. This finding was explained by a predominant catch-up growth in weight compared to length and reinforced by a faster weight gain from 1 year onwards.

The ‘one-step’ method allows the examination of growth trajectories longitudinally and provides a global test for the relationship between the exposure and weight/height trajectories overall and for period-specific characteristics of growth using the Jenss-Bayley model
parameters. The ‘two-step’ method provides statistical tests at specific ages (especially for BMI), thereby providing information on the magnitude of the between-subgroups differences.

The results regarding the associations between maternal smoking and BMI across childhood were very close using our indirect method or the fractional polynomials and splines However, the monotonic pattern of weight and height (in contrast to BMI growth) can be beneficial using our indirect BMI modeling. Our indirect modeling approach also provides additional assets. First, the height and weight model parameters have biological interpretability. Second, the model is less sensitive to outliers compared to non-structural models [16]. Third, our method does not need to collect weight and height measurements at the same time (in comparison with direct modeling), which increases the number of available measurements for modeling. Compared to the study of associations using observed data, our approach takes into account missing data and limits potential selection bias (Table D in S4 File). Furthermore, in contrast to model-predicted data, analyses using the observed data did not allow the assessment of the association at many time points and consequently the accurate characterization of the evolution of differences between the smoking subgroups over time. Finally, the observed data did not allow the assessment of associations with key growth milestones, such as instantaneous growth velocities and age and BMI at the BMI infancy peak.

In terms of weaknesses, the indirect BMI modeling did not allow the assessment of the global association between exposure and BMI trajectories, which can be performed for the height and weight trajectories separately; however, there can be some potential convergence issues when the covariate numbers increase. Additionally, the smoking status at the beginning of pregnancy was taken as a proxy measurement for the 1st trimester status. A high percentage of women quit very early in pregnancy, which could explain the lack of association with birth outcomes in children exposed exclusively during the 1st trimester. Furthermore, assessing the smoking status using a self-reported questionnaire could lead to misclassification bias. We do not expect that the estimated differences in anthropometric measurements between exposed and non-exposed children would be overestimated by underreporting.

In recent reviews of early determinants of overweight or obesity, maternal smoking during pregnancy was consistently associated with adult obesity [12] and child overweight and obesity [17,18]. These reviews were in favor of a long-lasting effect of maternal smoking on health. Our study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting the emergence of these associations in infancy. The few studies investigating early growth explained the increased BMI by a weight deficit at birth followed by a rapid weight catch-up growth prior to 1 year that lead to a similar or higher weight compared to non-exposed children later in childhood [19–21]. Although exposed children tend to catch up in weight, a persistently shorter height in late childhood was observed [20–22]. Our results on the growth velocities and C and D parameters showed a greater impact of maternal smoking on length than weight growth during the first 6 months of life. Because weight depends on length growth, this discrepancy is in favor of a differential effect on the different compartments of body weight. The BMI trajectory in children exposed during late pregnancy suggests a faster fat mass accretion in the first months of life with a higher BMI at the BMI infancy peak that is maintained throughout childhood.

In our population, a smaller weight and length at birth were associated with maternal smok-
ing during late pregnancy but not with smoking during the 1st trimester exclusively. These
results corroborate the association between maternal smoking and impaired fetal growth
reported in previous works [23,24]. Furthermore, maternal smoking exclusively during the 1st
trimester was not associated with any age-predicted BMI, supporting a study that found no
association between maternal smoking in the 1st trimester and the BMI of children up to 4
years [20] but contrasting with another study where a higher risk of being overweight was
found in children aged 5 to 7 years [25].
A direct effect of smoking during pregnancy has been postulated to occur through increased maternal and fetal carboxyhemoglobin blood levels, which are responsible for fetal hypoxia and growth retardation [26]. Subsequent associations with postnatal growth might be explained by a deregulation of the hypothalamic centers that regulate food intake, growth and adipocyte numbers [27]. Tobacco might also have a potentiating effect on hypothalamic structures, resulting in impaired insulin signaling and metabolism [27].

The persistent positive association between maternal smoking and overweight children in within-sibling analyses [28] and the higher effect estimates for maternal smoking compared with paternal smoking [29] support intrauterine effects, whereas the attenuated associations between maternal smoking and obesity in young adults in within-family analyses [30] backed by studies with similar [22,31–33] or stronger [34] associations between paternal and maternal smoking statuses and the offspring’s overweight BMI suggest residual confounding by unmeasured shared familial factors. We did not control for lifestyle characteristics. Although an effect of shared familial factors cannot be excluded, we propose that this effect is less likely because the differences appeared very early in life. The fast increase in the BMI during the first weeks of life could suggest that cessation of exposure to tobacco products (e.g., nicotine) immediately after birth may contribute to the observed association as previously speculated [35].

Our findings are consistent with an association between smoking in late pregnancy and upward BMI trajectories as early as the first months of life, resulting in a difference in the BMI that is maintained throughout the infancy and childhood periods. This result supports the concept that infant programming related to fetal exposure to adverse conditions has lasting or lifelong effects. The second and third trimesters of pregnancy could be more critical periods for the induction of lifelong susceptibility to obesity. Our approach based on height and weight modeling offers a convenient method to estimate key trajectory milestones and associations with early-life determinants.

**Supporting Information**

**S1 File. Indirect Body Mass Index Modeling.**

(DOCX)

**S2 File. Model Adequacies.**

(DOCX)

**S3 File. Dose Effect Analysis.**

(DOCX)

**S4 File. Sensitivity Analyses.**

(DOCX)

**S1 Table. Number of Measurements available for Modeling the Height and Weight growth of children (0–5 years) from the EDEN study, France, 2003–2012.**

(DOCX)

**Acknowledgments**

The EDEN (Etude des Déterminants pré et postnatals précoces du développement et de la santé de l'Enfant) study was provided by the Foundation for Medical Research, the French Ministry of Research (IFR program), the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Human Nutrition Research Program), the Diabetes National Research Program (via a collaboration with the French Association for Diabetes Research), the French Ministry of Health Perinatality Program, the French Agency for Environmental Security, the French National
Institute for Population Health Surveillance, the Paris-Sud University, the French National Institute for Health Education, Nestlé, the National Education Health Insurance, the French Speaking Association for the Study of Diabetes and Metabolism, the National Agency for Research (nonthematic program), and the National Institute for Research in Public Health (TGIR health cohort 2008 program).

We thank Lise Giorgis-Allemand and Anne Forhan for data management, the midwife research assistants (Lorraine Douhaud, Sophie Bedel, Brigitte Lortholary, Sophie Gabriel, Mur-iel Rogeon, and Monique Malinbaum) for data collection, and the data entry operators (Patri-cia Lavoine, Josiane Sahuquillo, and Ginette Debotte).

The EDEN mother-child cohort study group includes I. Annesi-Maesano, JY. Bernard, J. Botton, M.A. Charles, P. Dargent-Molina, B. de Lauzon-Guillain, P. Ducimetière, M. de Agos-tini, B. Foliguet, A. Forhan, X. Fritel, A. Germa, V. Goua, R. Hankard, B. Heude, M. Kaminski, B. Larroque†, N. Lelong, J. Lepeule, G. Magnin, L. Marchand, C. Nabet, F. Pierre, R. Slama, M. J. Saurel-Cubizolles, M. Schweitzer, O. Thiebaugeorges.

All of the authors have read, critiqued and approved the contents of this article.

## Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BH MAC. Performed the experiments: BH MAC. Analyzed the data: SC. Wrote the paper: SC MAC JB BH RS AF.

## References

1. Botton J, Heude B, Maccario J, Ducimetière P, Charles M-A, FLVS Study Group. Postnatal weight and height growth velocities at different ages between birth and 5 y and body composition in adolescent boys and girls. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008; 87:1760–8. PMID: 18541566

2. Eriksson JG. Early growth and coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes: findings from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study (HBCS). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011; 94:1799S–1802S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.000638 PMID: 21613556

3. Monteiro POA, Victora CG. Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life—a system-atic review. Obesity Reviews. 2005; 6:143–54. PMID: 15836465

4. Ziyab AH, Karmaus W, Kurukulaaratchy RJ, Zhang H, Arshad SH. Developmental trajectories of Body Mass Index from infancy to 18 years of age: prenatal determinants and health consequences. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2014; 68:934–41. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-203808 PMID: 24895184

5. Nagin DS, Odgers CL. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2010; 6:109–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413 PMID: 20192788

6. Bauer DJ. Observations on the Use of Growth Mixture Models in Psychological Research. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007; 42:757–86.

7. Wen X, Kleinman K, Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Taveras EM. Childhood body mass index trajecto-ries: modeling, characterizing, pairwise correlations and socio-demographic predictors of trajectory characteristics. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012; 12:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-38 PMID: 22458308

8. Royston P, Altman DG. Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimo-nious Parametric Modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics). 1994; 43:429–67.

9. Silverwood RJ, De Stavola BL, Cole TJ, Leon DA. BMI peak in infancy as a predictor for later BMI in the Uppsala Family Study. International Journal of Obesity. 2009; 33:929–37. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.108 PMID: 19564879

10. Howe LD, Tilling K, Benfield L, Logue J, Sattar N, Ness AR, et al. Changes in ponderal index and body mass index across childhood and their associations with fat mass and cardiovascular risk factors at age 15. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e15186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015186 PMID: 21170348

11. Botton J, Scherdel P, Regnault N, Heude B, Charles M-A, EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group. Postnatal weight and height growth modeling and prediction of body mass index as a function of time for the study of growth determinants. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 2014; 65:156–66.
12. Brisbois TD, Farmer AP, McCargar LJ. Early markers of adult obesity: a review. *Obesity Reviews*. 2012; 13:347–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00965.x PMID: 22171945

13. Heude B, Forhan A, Slama R, Douhaud L, Bedel S, Saurel-Cubizolles M-J, et al. Cohort Profile: The EDEN mother-child cohort on the prenatal and early postnatal determinants of child health and development. *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2015;

14. Bonet M, Marchand L, Kaminski M, Fohran A, Betoko A, Charles M-A, et al. Breastfeeding duration, social and occupational characteristics of mothers in the French "EDEN mother-child" cohort. *Maternal and Child Health Journal*. 2013; 17:714–22. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1053-4 PMID: 22729659

15. Comets E, Lavenu A, Lavielle M. SAEMIX, an R version of the SAEM algorithm for parameter estimation in nonlinear mixed effect models [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 Jan 7]. Available from: http://papersjds14.sfds.asso.fr/submission_54.pdf

16. Chirwa ED, Griffiths PL, Maleta K, Norris SA, Cameron N. Multi-level modelling of longitudinal child growth data from the Birth-to-Twenty Cohort: a comparison of growth models. *Annals of Human Biology*. 2014; 41:168–79. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2013.839742 PMID: 24111514

17. Ino T. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring obesity: meta-analysis. *Pediatrics International: Official Journal of the Japan Pediatric Society*. 2010; 52:94–9.

18. Oken E, Levitan EB, Gillman MW. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child overweight: systematic review and meta-analysis. *International Journal of Obesity*. 2008; 32:201–10. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803760 PMID: 18278059

19. Timmermans SH, Mommers M, Gubbels JS, Kremers SPJ, Stafleu A, Stehouwer CDA, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and childhood overweight and fat distribution: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study. *Pediatric Obesity*. 2014; 9:e14–25. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00141.x PMID: 23362054

20. Durmus B, Kruithof CJ, Gillman MH, Willemse SP, Hofman A, Raat H, et al. Parental smoking during pregnancy, early growth, and risk of obesity in preschool children: the Generation R Study. *The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition*. 2011; 94:164–71. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.009225 PMID: 21593510

21. Chen A, Pennell ML, Klebanoff MA, Rogan WJ, Longnecker MP. Maternal smoking during pregnancy in relation to child overweight: follow-up to age 8 years. *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2006; 35:121–30. PMID: 16260450

22. Howe LD, Matijasevich A, Tilling K, Brion M-J, Leary SD, Smith GD, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring trajectories of height and adiposity: comparing maternal and paternal associations. *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2012; 41:722–32. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys025 PMID: 22407859

23. Iñiguez C, Ballester F, Costa O, Murcia M, Souto A, Santa-Marina L, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal biometry: the INMA Mother and Child Cohort Study. *American Journal of Epidemiology*. 2013; 178:1067–75. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt085 PMID: 24008909

24. Jaddoe VW, Verburg BO, de Ridder MA, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: the generation R study. *American Journal of Epidemiology*. 2007; 165:1207–15. PMID: 17329715

25. Mendez MA, Torrent M, Ferrer C, Ribas-Fitó N, Sunyer J. Maternal smoking very early in pregnancy is related to child overweight at age 5–7 y. *The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition*. 2008; 87:1906–13. PMID: 18541584

26. DiFranza JR, Aligne CA, Weitzman M. Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children's health. *Pediatrics*. 2004; 113:1007–15. PMID: 15060193

27. Toschke AM, Montgomery SM, Pfeiffer U, von Kries R. Early intrauterine exposure to tobacco-inhaled products and obesity. *American Journal of Epidemiology*. 2003; 158:1068–74. PMID: 14630602

28. Gilman SE, Gardener H, Buka SL. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and children's cognitive and physical development: a causal risk factor? *American Journal of Epidemiology*. 2008; 168:522–31. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn175 PMID: 18653646

29. Riedel C, Schönberger K, Yang S, Koshy G, Chen Y-C, Gopinath B, et al. Parental smoking and childhood obesity: higher effect estimates for maternal smoking in pregnancy compared with paternal smoking—a meta-analysis. *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2014; 43:1593–606. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu150 PMID: 25080528

30. Iliadou AN, Koupil I, Villamor E, Altman D, Hultman C, Långström N, et al. Familial factors confound the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and young adult offspring overweight. *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2010; 39:1193–202. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq064 PMID: 20430830

31. von Kries R, Bolte G, Baghi L, Toschke AM. GME Study Group. Parental smoking and childhood obesity—is maternal smoking in pregnancy the critical exposure? *International Journal of Epidemiology*. 2008; 37:210–6. PMID: 18056122
32. Kwok MK, Schooling CM, Lam TH, Leung GM. Paternal smoking and childhood overweight: evidence from the Hong Kong "Children of 1997". Pediatrics. 2010; 126:e46-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2642
PMID: 20587672

33. Leary SD, Smith GD, Rogers IS, Reilly JJ, Wells JCK, Ness AR. Smoking during pregnancy and off-spring fat and lean mass in childhood. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006; 14:2284-93.

34. Florath I, Kohler M, Weck MN, Brandt S, Rothenbacher D, Schöttker B, et al. Association of pre- and post-natal parental smoking with offspring body mass index: an 8-year follow-up of a birth cohort. Pediatric Obesity. 2014; 9:121-34. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00146.x PMID: 23420701

35. Chen H, Morris MJ. Maternal smoking-A contributor to the obesity epidemic? Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 2007; 1:1-11.