# Two Argan Oil Phytosterols, Schottenol and Spinasterol, Attenuate Oxidative Stress and Restore LPS-Dysregulated Peroxisomal Functions in Acox1-/- and Wild-Type BV-2 Microglial Cells

Soukaina Essadek, Catherine Gondcaille, Stéphane Savary, Mohammad Samadi, Joseph Vamecq, Gérard Lizard, Riad El Kebbaj, Norbert Latruffe, Alexandre Benani, Boubker Nasser, et al.

► To cite this version:

Soukaina Essadek, Catherine Gondcaille, Stéphane Savary, Mohammad Samadi, Joseph Vamecq, et al. Two Argan Oil Phytosterols, Schottenol and Spinasterol, Attenuate Oxidative Stress and Restore LPS-Dysregulated Peroxisomal Functions in Acox1-/- and Wild-Type BV-2 Microglial Cells. Antioxidants, 2023, 12 (1), pp.168. 10.3390/antiox12010168. [https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010168](https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010168)

HAL Id: hal-03994321

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03994321

Submitted on 17 Feb 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Two Argan Oil Phytosterols, Schottenol and Spinasterol, Attenuate Oxidative Stress and Restore LPS-Dysregulated Peroxisomal Functions in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ and Wild-Type BV-2 Microglial Cells

Soukaina Essadek<sup>1,2</sup>, Catherine Gondcaille<sup>2</sup>, Stéphane Savary<sup>2 ID</sup>, Mohammad Samadi<sup>3</sup>, Joseph Vamecq<sup>4 ID</sup>, Gérard Lizard<sup>2 ID</sup>, Riad El Kebbaj<sup>5 ID</sup>, Norbert Latruffe<sup>2 ID</sup>, Alexandre Benani<sup>6</sup>, Boubker Nasser<sup>1</sup>, Mustapha Cherkaoui-Malki<sup>2,* ID</sup> and Pierre Andreoletti<sup>2,* ID</sup>

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Essadek, S.; Gondcaille, C.; Savary, S.; Samadi, M.; Vamecq, J.; Lizard, G.; Kebbaj, R.E.; Latruffe, N.; Benani, A.; Nasser, B.; et al. Two Argan Oil Phytosterols, Schottenol and Spinasterol, Attenuate Oxidative Stress and Restore LPS-Dysregulated Peroxisomal Functions in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ and Wild-Type BV-2 Microglial Cells. *Antioxidants* **2023**, *12*, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12010168

Academic Editor:
Alessandra Napolitano

Received: 6 December 2022

Revised: 27 December 2022

Accepted: 4 January 2023

Published: 11 January 2023

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).

**Abstract:** Oxidative stress and inflammation are the key players in neuroinflammation, in which microglia dysfunction plays a central role. Previous studies suggest that argan oil attenuates oxidative stress, inflammation, and peroxisome dysfunction in mouse brains. In this study, we explored the effects of two major argan oil (AO) phytosterols, Schottenol (Schot) and Spinasterol (Spina), on oxidative stress, inflammation, and peroxisomal dysfunction in two murine microglial BV-2 cell lines, *wild-type* (*Wt*) and *Acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (Acox1)*-deficient cells challenged with LPS treatment. Herein, we used an MTT test to reveal no cytotoxicity for both phytosterols with concentrations up to 5 µM. In the LPS-activated microglial cells, cotreatment with each of these phytosterols caused a significant decrease in intracellular ROS production and the NO level released in the culture medium. Additionally, Schot and Spina were able to attenuate the LPS-dependent strong induction of *Il-1β* and *Tnf-α* mRNA levels, as well as the *iNos* gene and protein expression in both *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ microglial cells. On the other hand, LPS treatment impacted both the peroxisomal antioxidant capacity and the fatty acid oxidation pathway. However, both Schot and Spina treatments enhanced ACOX1 activity in the *Wt* BV-2 cells and normalized the catalase activity in both *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ microglial cells. These data suggest that Schot and Spina can protect cells from oxidative stress and inflammation and their harmful consequences for peroxisomal functions and the homeostasis of microglial cells. Collectively, our work provides a compelling argument for the protective mechanisms of two major argan oil phytosterols against LPS-induced brain neuroinflammation.

**Keywords:** Acyl-CoA oxidase 1; argan oil; BV-2; catalase; inflammation; LPS; microglia; peroxisome; schottenol; Spinasterol

<footnote n="1">¹ Laboratory of Biochimistry, Neuroscience, Natural Resources and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Hassan I, Settat 26000, Morocco</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Bio-PeroxIL Laboratory, EA7270, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté/Inserm, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Laboratory of Chemistry and Physics Multi-Scale Approach to Complex Environments, Department of Chemistry, University Lorraine, 57070 Metz, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Inserm and HMNO, CBP, CHRU Lille, and RADEME EA 7364, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lille 2, 59045 Lille, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Laboratory of Health Sciences and Technologies, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Hassan 1st University, Settat 26000, Morocco</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ CSGA—Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, CNRS—Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, INRAE—Institut National de Recherche pour L’agriculture, L’alimentation et L’environnement, Institut Agro Dijon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: malki@u-bourgogne.fr (M.C.-M.); pierre.andreoletti@u-bourgogne.fr (P.A.); Tel.: +33-380-39-62-37 (M.C.-M.); +33-380-39-62-55 (P.A.)</footnote>
# 1. Introduction

Microglial cells play a sentinel role in the regulation of brain development and homeostasis [1]. They are involved in oxidative stress; neuroinflammation; and the physiopathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and peroxisomal leukodystrophies [2,3]. Activated microglia may disturb healthy neurons, leading to neurodegeneration [4], by producing proinflammatory molecules, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide (NO) [5–7]. The activation of microglia can also be triggered by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the brain of animal models for sepsis [8,9]. Furthermore, LPS-activated microglia can trigger the death of growing oligodendrocytes [10]. The release of ROS by LPS-activated microglia is a key step in the generation of neurotoxicity [11], which can be principally abrogated by neutralizing extracellular hydrogen peroxide and superoxide by catalase and superoxide dismutase treatment, respectively [12,13]. This underlines the key antioxidant function of peroxisomal antioxidant enzymes.

Peroxisomal leukodystrophies include peroxisome biogenesis disorders caused by a mutation of one of the peroxin-encoding genes, leading to the Zellweger syndrome spectrum [14,15]. On the other hand, some inborn errors only concern the transport or the metabolism of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA). For instance, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy is associated with mutations in the ATP-binding cassette transporter D1 (ABCD1) gene and ACOX1 deficiency with mutations in the acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1) gene, which controls the rate-limiting step of peroxisomal β-oxidation [16]. In these leukodystrophies, increased oxidative stress, associated with peroxisomal metabolism dysfunction, is now considered the first stage in the development of a progressive demyelination and neurodegeneration [17].

With the aim of deciphering the role of microglia in the physiopathogenesis of the peroxisomal leukodystrophies, we used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate microglial cell models deficient in the peroxisomal VLCFA β-oxidation pathway [18,19]. Among these cell models, the microglial BV-2-Acox1⁻/⁻ cell line exhibited a substantial change in the expression of several key genes involved in microglial functions related to antioxidant activity, inflammation, and phagocytosis [19]. Furthermore, we recently reported that argan oil (AO) pretreatment can abrogate the early oxidative stress caused by LPS and preserve peroxisomal functions, including antioxidant and β-oxidation activities, in both brain and liver mouse tissues [20]. AO has been shown to attenuate the oxidative stress; organelle dysfunction (mitochondria, lysosomes, peroxisomes); and cell death in the oligodendrocytes caused by pro-oxidant compounds such as 7-ketocholesterol, which is often increased during aging and in patients with age-related diseases [21]. In addition, the AO phytosterols, Schottenol (Schot) and Spinasterol (Spina), are able to modulate the mitochondrial membrane potential of microglial BV-2 cells [22].

Phytosterol-enriched foods have been marketed for decades and have gained much attention in the last few years [23]. They belong to the triterpene family with a cholesterol-like structure and are present at high concentrations in edible vegetable oils [24]. The total phytosterol content varies between 83 and 160 mg/100 g of argan oil, which contains the following major sterols (in mg/100g oil): α-cholestanol (12.63%), compestanol (3.73%), campesterol (0.2%), Δ-7-Avenasterol (4.2%), β-Sitosterol (3.56%), Spinasterol (35.3%), and Schottenol (43.8%) [22,25]. Phytosterols are widely used as food supplements, and it has been claimed that they are highly beneficial to humans in terms of health and disease [26]. The pharmacological properties of plant phytosterols for human health have been investigated in several studies [27]. Phytosterols interfere with the intestinal absorption of cholesterol, leading to a reduction in blood cholesterol levels [24,28,29], which underlies their benefit of lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease [30]. Phytosterols have also displayed significant anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiulcerative, and antitumor properties [27,31,32]. These compounds reduced the expression of the pro-inflammatory mediators (i.e., cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)) in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages [33].
Although the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of AO have been well-
investigated, to date, few studies have explored the compounds responsible for its bi-
ological activities. Here, we attempted to investigate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory
effects, as well as the capacity to restore peroxisomal functions, of two major AO phytos-
terols derivatives, Schottenol (Schot) and Spinasterol (Spina). In this study, we investigated
their effects on both wild-type (Wt) and ACOX1-deficient (Acox1⁻/⁻) BV-2 cell lines [19],
with and without activation by LPS.

**2. Materials and Methods**

**2.1. *Cell Cultures and Treatments***

The wild-type (Wt) [34] and knockout *Acox1* (*Acox1*⁻/⁻) [19] BV-2 microglial murine cell lines were grown and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Lonza, Amboise, France) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine heat-inactivated serum (Dutscher, Bernolsheim, France) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics (Dutscher, Bernolsheim, France). Cells were cultured at an appropriate seeding density at 37 °C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO₂. Cells were trypsinized in 0.05% trypsin-0.02% EDTA solution.

Schot and Spina were synthesized by Mohammad Samadi (Department of Chemistry, University Lorraine, Metz, France) and previously characterized [35]. Five milligrams of Schot or Spina was diluted in 500 µL of absolute ethanol; afterwards, the solutions were sonicated for 10 min then stored at 4 °C until use, at which point they were diluted in the culture medium to achieve the final concentrations indicated in the figures. 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC), known for its cytotoxicity, was used as a positive control in the MTT assay. Stock solution was prepared by dissolving 5 mg of 7-KC in 250 µL of absolute ethanol and then diluted in the culture medium to achieve a final concentration of 20 µM.

**2.2. MTT Test**

An MTT test was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Spina and Schot at 24 h or 48 h of treatment on BV2-Wt and BV2-*Acox1*⁻/⁻ cell proliferation and/or viability [36]. We seeded 4 × 10⁴ cells/well in 24-well plates and treated them for 24 h or 48 h with Spina at 1, 2.5, 5, or 20 µM; Schot at 1, 2.5, 5, or 20 µM; or 7-KC at 20 µM for 24 h or 48 h as a positive control [22]. At the end of treatment, cells were incubated for 3 h with an MTT solution at a final concentration of 0.05 mg/mL. After incubation, 1 ml of DMSO/well was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm.

**2.3. Griess Test**

Nitric oxide production in the culture medium was measured using the Griess reagent test [37]. After 24h incubation at 4 × 10⁴ cells/well with different treatments (Schot at 1 or 2.5 µM and Spina at 1 or 2.5 µM), activation was performed with LPS (1 µg/mL). The supernatant was removed and placed in a 96-well plate; an equal volume of Griess reagent (1% sulphanilamide and 0.1% naphthyl-ethylene-diamine in 5% H₃PO₄) was added after 30 min incubation in the dark at room temperature; and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. For the calibration curve, NaNO₂ dilutions from 0.39 to 100 µM were used.

**2.4. Measurement of Intracellular ROS**

Intracellular ROS production levels were measured using 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H₂DCFDA) and dihydroethidium (DHE) assays [38]. Cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 10⁴ cells/well in a 96-well plate in DMEM phenol-red-free medium for 7 h (the peak of ROS production after LPS stimulation, according to a personal communication with Stephane Savary) with different phytosterol treatments with or without LPS stimulation. Then, the treatment medium was discarded, and cells were washed with PBS and incubated with either 5 µM H₂DCFDA or 10 µM DHE for 70 min at 37 °C in 5% CO₂. Cell fluorescence emissions were measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite Pro M200, Tecan, Lyon, France).
Hoechst staining was used to estimate cell density and calculate ROS production per cell using the formulas below.

$$ \text{For H}_2\text{DCFDA: } R_1 = (\text{mean H}_2\text{DCFDA-background})/(\text{mean Hoechst-background}) $$

$$ \text{For DHE: } R_2 = (\text{mean DHE-background})/(\text{mean Hoechst-background}) $$

The reported values are ratios calculated as R treated cells/R control untreated cells.

## 2.5. Cell Homogenate Preparation

We rinsed 8 × 10⁶ BV-2 cells in PBS and then lysed them in RIPA lysis buffer (Tris 1M, NaCl 150 mM, NP-40 at 1%, SDS 0.1%, and sodium deoxycholate 1%) containing a mixture of protease inhibitors. Cells were homogenized on ice using an ultrasound and then centrifuged for 30 min at 10,000 × g. The supernatants were collected, and the protein content was measured using bovine serum albumin as a standard and a Bicinchoninic Acid Kit (SigmaAldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Samples were stored at -80 °C until use for further experiments.

## 2.6. Catalase Activity Measurement

Catalase activity was evaluated following a photometric measurement of the H₂O₂ decomposition by catalase contained in the cell extract at 240 nm [39]. The reaction was carried out in a special 96-well UV microplate (Greiner 655801 type, Dutscher, Bernolsheim, France). A reaction mixture of H₂O₂ solution (30%) and Tris-HCl buffer (1M, pH 7.4) was added to the cell extract, and the reaction was carried out for 2 min. One unit of the enzyme is defined as 1 µmol of H₂O₂ consumed per minute, and the specific activity is reported as units per milligram of protein according to the following formula:

$$ \text{Catalase specific activity} = \frac{\Delta Abs_{240nm} \cdot \text{min}^{-1}}{43.2} \times 10^6 \times \frac{200}{10} \times \frac{1}{[\text{protein}] \cdot \text{mg} \cdot \text{l}^{-1}} $$

## 2.7. Acyl-CoA Oxidase 1 Activity Measurement

The measurement of ACOX1 activity was performed according to the protocol described by Oaxaca-Castillo et al. [40] using a fluorometry-based assay. The reaction was carried out in a 96-well plate using 200 µL reaction mixture containing Tris-buffer (50 mM, pH 8.3); horseradish peroxidase (20 mg/mL); homovanillic acid (0.75 mM); and acyl-CoA substrate (palmitoyl-CoA at a final concentration of 50 mM). The reaction was initiated at 30 °C by the addition of 10 µL enzymatic solution. The kinetics of the appearance of fluorescence was measured at 420 nm every 30 s for 120 cycles (total kinetic of 60 min) using a fluorimeter (Fluorimeter/luminometer Infinite M200 pro, TECAN). The initial rate of the reaction was determined from the kinetic curves, and the calculation of the specific activity of ACOX1 is expressed in units of H₂O₂ produced per minute per milligram of protein (1 µM d'H₂O₂ corresponds to 115.75 RFU) according to the following formula:

$$ \text{ACOX1 specific activity} = \frac{\Delta RFU \cdot \text{min}^{-1}}{RFU (\text{correspond of 1 µM d'H}_2\text{O}_2) \cdot \text{min}^{-1}} \times Fd \times \frac{200}{10} \times \frac{1}{[\text{protein}] \cdot \text{mg} \cdot \text{l}^{-1}} \quad (1) $$

## 2.8. Immunoblotting

Cell protein lysate was prepared as described above. Fifty micrograms of protein was diluted (v/v) in the loading buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 14% mercaptoethanol, and 0.003% Bromophenol blue), and the complete denaturation of the protein was achieved by incubation at 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were then separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The non-specific binding sites were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 8) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with the primary antibody diluted in 1% milk TBST overnight at 4 °C (anti-ABCD1, "serum 029" from Bio-
PeroxIL laboratory [18], dilution 1/2000; anti-ABCD2, ab 102948, from Abcam, Paris, France, dilution 1/1000; anti-catalase, AF3398 from R&D Systems Noyal Châtillon sur Seiche, France, dilution 1/400; anti-β-actin, A2228 from Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France, dilution 1/10,000). Following three washes for 10 min in PBST, the membranes were immersed for 1 h at room temperature with an appropriate secondary antibody (dilution 1/5000 in 1% milk TBST) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Membranes were washed three times in TPBS for 10 min, and the Supersignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) was used to reveal the immunoreactivity through enhanced chemiluminescence and a Chemidoc XRS+ device (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). Image processing and quantification were performed using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France).

## 2.9. *Quantitative Reverse-Transcription-PCR*

We used RT-qPCR to determine the mRNA expression in the *Wt* and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 microglia cell lines after different treatments. Cells were collected by trypsinization (trypsin-EDTA, 2 mM solution) and then washed twice with PBS after centrifugation for 5 min at 300 g. Cell pellets were used for total RNA extraction and purification using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The purity of nucleic acids was controlled by the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to 280 nm, accepting a ratio between 1.8 and 2.2. cDNA was generated by reverse-transcription using an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quantitative PCR of cDNA was realized using FG Power SYBR Green (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) and an iCycler iQ Real-Time Detection System (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The primer sequences are described in Table 1. PCR reactions were carried out in triplicate at a final volume of 15 µL, containing 7.5 µL MESA Green qPCR Mastermix (Eurogentec, Uppsala, Sweden) and 3.5 µL of cDNA and forward and reverse primers at 300 nM. Thermal cycling conditions were achieved by the activation of DNA polymerase at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was performed to control the absence of non-specific products. For each transcript, the amplification efficiency was determined by the slope of the standard curve generated from twofold serial dilutions of cDNA. The 2<sup>-ΔΔCt</sup> method was used to determine the relative gene expression. The results are depicted as graphs of relative expression data (fold induction) [41].

## 2.10. *Data Analysis*

All experimental values are expressed as the average of mean ± standard deviation. The error bars presented on the figures correspond to the standard deviation. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple-comparisons test, with a significance level of *p* ≤ 0.05.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Sequences of the primers used for qPCR.</caption><thead><tr><th>Gene Name</th><th>Accession Number</th><th>Primer Sequences</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Abcd1-F</td><td rowspan="2">NM_007435.2</td><td>5'GCCAAGTTGTGGATGTGGAG3'</td></tr><tr><td>Abcd1-R</td><td>5'TTCCGCAGAGTCGGGATAGA3'</td></tr><tr><td>Abcd2-F</td><td rowspan="2">NM_011994.4</td><td>5'TAGAACGCATCCTGCACAGC3'</td></tr><tr><td>Abcd2-R</td><td>5'CTCCTTCGCCATCGAATTGT3'</td></tr><tr><td>Acox1-F</td><td rowspan="2">NM_001377522.1</td><td>5'TCGAAGCCAGCGTTACGAG3'</td></tr><tr><td>Acox1-R</td><td>5'GGTCTGCGATGCCAAATTCC3'</td></tr><tr><td>Cat-F</td><td rowspan="2">NM_009804.2</td><td>5'AGCGACCAGATGAAGCAGTG3'</td></tr><tr><td>Cat-R</td><td>5'TCCGCTCTCTGTCAAAGTGTG3'</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** *Cont.*</caption><thead><tr><th>Gene Name</th><th>Accession Number</th><th>Primer Sequences</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Il-1β-F<br>Il-1β-R</td><td>NM_008361.4</td><td>5'GAGATTGAGCTGTCTGCTCA 3'<br>5'AAGGAGAACCAAGCAACGAC 3'</td></tr><tr><td>Il-4-F<br>IL-4-R</td><td>NM_021283.2</td><td>5'CCATATCCACGGATGCGACAA3'<br>5'CCTCGTTCAAAATGCCGATGAT3'</td></tr><tr><td>iNos-F<br>iNos-R</td><td>NM_010927.4</td><td>5'CCTAGTCAACTGCAAGAGAA3'<br>5'TTTCAGGTCACTTTGGTAGG3'</td></tr><tr><td>Tnf-α-F<br>Tnf-α-R</td><td>NM_013693.3</td><td>5'CCCTCACACTCAGATCATCTTCT3'<br>5'GCTACGACGTGGGCTACAG3'</td></tr><tr><td>36b4-F<br>36b4-R</td><td>NM_007475.5</td><td>5'CGACCTGGAAGTCCAACTAC3'<br>5'ATCTGCTGCATCTGCTTG3'</td></tr></tbody></table>

## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effects of Schot and Spina on Cell Viability

An MTT test was performed to evaluate the effect of Schot and Spina on the mitochondrial function and cell viability of *Wt* and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 microglial cells. The effect of Schot and Spina on the cell viability was assessed at a concentration range of 1 to 20 µM for 24 or 48 h. 7-ketocholesterol (20 µM) was used as a cytotoxic positive control. No cytotoxic effect was shown under either Schot or Spina treatment at 1 or 2.5 µM for 24h (Figure 1A,B). Regarding the genotype, the treatment of both the *Wt* and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 cell lines by Schot and Spina showed no significant differences in the effect of the two phytosterols, even at the highest concentration of 20 µM, revealing 75 % viability for treated cells compared to untreated control cells. However, treatment with Schot and Spina for 48 h exhibited a more pronounced effect, with Schot treatment inducing a decrease in cell viability of 40% at 20 µM (Figure 1B).

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Effects of Schot and Spina on the cell proliferation and viability of the *Wt* and the *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 microglial cells for 24 (A) or 48 (B) hours. Cell proliferation and viability were assessed by the MTT test. Cells were treated with Schot or Spina at a range of concentrations from 1 to 20 µM. 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC) was used at 20 µM as a positive control. All compounds were tested for 24 or 48 h. All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Values were normalized to the control. Statistical significance compared to control (*** *p* ≤ 0.001, ** *p* ≤ 0.01, * *p* ≤ 0.05) was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test.

On the other hand, *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 cells were shown to be more sensitive to Spina treatment compared to *Wt* BV-2 cells, especially at the 1 and 2.5 µM concentrations. However, the cell viability was still around 80% (Figure 1). Like Schot at 48 h, Spina decreased the viability of *Wt* and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 cells by almost 40% at 20 µM (Figure 1). Moreover, the data obtained after 7-KC treatment revealed that the mitochondrial activity of the *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup>
BV-2 cells was significantly affected by 7-KC treatment at 24 h compared to that of the *Wt* BV-2 cells (Figure 1A). The cell viability of both cell lines was reduced in response to 7-KC treatment at 24 and 48 h (Figure 1A,B). The inhibition of cell viability reached 75% when *Acox 1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells were treated with 7-KC for 48 h (Figure 1B). 7-KC is a major toxic and pro-oxidant product of cholesterol oxidation that is known for its cytotoxic effect and its ability to trigger cell death [21].

## 3.2. Schot and Spina Effects on LPS-Induced Intracellular ROS Accumulation

ROS play a crucial role in cell signaling for growth, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. In this study, we investigated the effect of Schot and Spina at 1 or 2.5 µM on intracellular ROS accumulation induced by LPS treatment at 1 µg/mL. We used two different ROS probes, H₂DCFDA and DHE. H₂DCFDA is a specific probe for the detection of H₂O₂. H₂DCFDA can also be oxidized by hydroxyl radicals, hydroperoxides, and peroxynitrite. However, it has been shown to be highly sensitive to H₂O₂ [42]. As shown in Figure 2, in contrast to the *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells, LPS treatment induced significant intracellular ROS production in the *Wt* cells, exhibiting a 2.3-fold increase in LPS-treated cells compared to the control (Figure 2A). This LPS-increased ROS production was significantly abrogated by cotreatment with Schot and Spina at a minimum of 1 µM in *Wt* cells (Figure 2A).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Figure 2.** Effects of Schot and Spina on ROS production induced by LPS in the *Wt* (A) and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ (B) BV-2 microglial cells assessed by the H₂DCFDA (5 µM) dye test. Cells were incubated for 7 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increase in mean signal indicated as ### *p* ≤ 0.01 and # *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to LPS and $$$ *p* ≤ 0.001 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.

The detection of superoxide radicals by DHE probes revealed broadly similar results to the H₂DCFDA test. The treatment with Schot or Spina alone had no effect on superoxide production. LPS treatment induced significant superoxide radical accumulation in the *Wt* BV-2 cells (Figure 3A). This effect was significantly attenuated by cotreatment with Schot at 1 or 2.5 µM in a dose-dependent manner and slightly attenuated by Spina at 1 µM compared to LPS-treated cells (Figure 3A). Treatment with Schot or Spina alone had no effect on superoxide production in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells. Meanwhile, LPS-treated *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells showed no significant increase in superoxide production (Figure 3B).
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Effect of Schot and Spina on ROS production induced by LPS in the *Wt* (A) and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> (B) BV-2 microglial cells assessed by the DHE (5 µM) dye test. Cells were incubated for 7 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the presence or absence of LPS (1 µg/mL). All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increase in mean signal indicated as ### *p* ≤ 0.01, ### *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to LPS and $$$ *p* ≤ 0.01 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.3. *Schot and Spina Effects on LPS-Induced Nitric Oxide (NO) Generation*

Nitric oxide is a signaling molecule known for its important role in acute and chronic inflammation in the nervous system and apoptosis [43]. To evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of Schot and Spina, we measured the level of NO production in the absence or the presence of LPS. Treatment with Schot or Spina alone at 1 or 2.5 µM had no effect on NO production in *Wt* BV-2 cells (Figure 4A). After incubation with LPS, the level of NO was increased significantly by three folds in comparison to the control cells (Figure 4A). Both Schot and Spina were able to significantly reduce the LPS-induced NO level (Figure 4A). Similar effects were observed in the *Acox 1*<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 cell line on the LPS-induced NO level after treatment with Schot or Spina (Figure 4B).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Effect of Schot and Spina on the NO production induced by LPS in the culture media of the *Wt* (A) and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> (B) BV-2 microglial cells assessed by the Griess test. Cells were incubated for 24h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or the presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increase in mean signal indicated as ### *p* ≤ 0.01 compared to LPS and $$$ *p* ≤ 0.001 and $$ *p* ≤ 0.01 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.4. Effect of Schot and Spina on Peroxisomal Catalase and ACOX1 Activities

We investigated the effect of Schot and Spina on peroxisomal LPS-dysregulated function by measuring the activities of peroxisomal catalase and ACOX1. As shown in Figure 5, treatment with either Schot or Spina at both concentrations had no significant effect on catalase or ACOX1 activities. On the other hand, LPS treatment significantly increased (>6 folds) the CAT activity in the Wt BV-2 cells and even more so (>7.5 folds) in the *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells (Figure 5A,B). Previously, we reported that the deficiency of ACOX1 in BV-2 microglial cells is accompanied by increased catalase activity [19]. Interestingly, in both Wt and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells, both Schot (1 and 2.5 µM) and Spina (at least 1 µM) treatments were able to restore the LPS-induced CAT activity to the control level (Figure 5A,B). Peroxisomal ACOX1 activity was significantly reduced by LPS treatment in the Wt BV-2 cells, and both Schot and Spina were able to restore the ACOX1 activity in Wt cells (Figure 5C). Thus, argan-oil-derived phytosterols can counteract the deleterious effects of LPS on peroxisomal antioxidant and β-oxidative activities.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Effect of Schot and Spina on catalase activity in the Wt (A) and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ (B) BV-2 microglial cells, and on ACOX1 activity (C) in Wt BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or the presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increased mean signal indicated as ### *p* ≤ 0.01 and ### *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to LPS and $$$ *p* ≤ 0.001 and $$ *p* ≤ 0.01 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.5. Effects of Schot and Spina on Peroxisomal Protein Expression

To investigate the role of Schot and Spina treatment in LPS-induced peroxisomal function dysregulation and inflammation, we evaluated the expression of the proteins involved in peroxisomal antioxidative (catalase) and β-oxidative (ACOX1, ABCD1, and ABCD2) functions and acting as inflammation markers (iNOS) in Wt and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 microglial cells. Treatment with Schot and Spina both increased ACOX1 polypeptide levels in Wt cells (Figure 6A), while LPS increased only the expression of the ACOX1 51 kDa peptide, which resulted from 72 kDa polypeptide processing [40]. The combined treatments of Schot–LPS and Spina–LPS both substantially decreased ACOX1 peptide expression in Wt BV-2 cells (Figure 6A). On the other hand, incubation with LPS increased the catalase (by 2.2 and 1.3 folds) and iNOS (39.6 and 53.3 folds) protein expression in Wt and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells, respectively, compared to control cells (Figure 6A,B). These increases seemed to be attenuated by Schot or Spina cotreatment, with Schot at 1 µM bringing the catalase protein expression level close to the control value in the Wt BV-2 cell line. Both Schot and Spina exhibited high efficiency in decreasing LPS-induced iNOS expression in Wt BV-2 cells, but only very slightly in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells (Figure 6A,B). The treatment with Schot or Spina alone had a slight increasing effect on catalase protein expression in Wt BV-2 cells, while in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells, both phytosterols showed only weak effects (Figure 6A,B).
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Immunoblotting assay showing effects of Schot and Spina on the expression of the peroxisomal proteins ACOX1, CAT, ABCD1, and ABCD2 and the inflammatory marker iNOS in *Wt* (A) and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ (B) BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). Cell homogenates were analyzed by PAGE-SDS electrophoresis and subjected to immunoblotting. Band intensities were analyzed by densitometry and standardized to β-actin expression level. Table values represent standardized densitometric analysis obtained after the signal intensity quantification of different proteins.</figcaption></figure>

Further, LPS treatment decreased the expression of both peroxisomal VLCFA transporters, ABCD1 and ABCD2, in *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells (Figure 6A,B). Interestingly, the combined treatment of LPS with Schot or Spina abrogated, fully in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells and partially in *Wt* cells, the effect of LPS on ABCD1 protein expression. While at the higher concentration of 2.5 µM, both phytosterols increased ABCD1 expression level in the LPS-treated *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cell line compared to the control cells (Figure 6B). However, neither Schot nor Spina rescued the LPS-induced decrease in the ABCD2 protein expression level in either cell line (Figure 6A,B).

### 3.6. Schot and Spina Effect on the Expression of Peroxisomal Protein-Encoding Genes

LPS treatment significantly increased the *Cat* mRNA level in both *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells (Figure 7A,B). Only the cotreatments of Schot–LPS at 1 µM and Spina–LPS at 2.5 µM caused a significant decrease in LPS-induced *Cat* gene expression in *Wt* cells (Figure 7A). In *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells, the LPS-induced increase in *Cat* mRNA expression was mostly abrogated by Scot and Spina cotreatment (Figure 7B). The gene expression of *Acox1* was assessed in the *Wt* cell line, showing no significant changes after treatment with either Scot or Spina alone or in combination with LPS (Figure 7A). On the other hand, only the combination of LPS and Spina at 2.5 µM increased *Abcd1* expression (Figure 8A). LPS treatment significantly reduced the gene expression of *Abcd2* mRNA in *Wt* BV-2 cells (Figure 8B). Although neither Schot nor Spina alone had an effect on *Abcd1* and *Abcd2* mRNA levels in *Wt* cells, in the presence of LPS, only the *Abcd2* gene expression level was increased by both phytosterols (Figure 8B). In *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 cells, the reduction in *Abcd1* and *Abcd2* mRNA by LPS was not significant (Figure 8C,D). Schot alone or in the presence of LPS also had no effect on *Abcd1* or *Abcd2* mRNA levels (Figure 8C,D). In contrast, Spina alone increased the gene expression of both *Abcd1* (at 2.5 µM) and *Abcd2* (at 1 µM and 2.5 µM), and in the presence of LPS, Spina slightly increased the mRNA expressions of both genes in *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells (Figure 8C,D).
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Effect of Schot and Spina treatment on the gene expression of *Cat* (**A**,**B**) and *Acox1* (**C**) in *Wt* (**A**,**C**) and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> (**B**) BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). Total RNA was isolated from BV-2 cells, and then the expression level of genes of interest was quantified by real-time RT-qPCR. All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increased mean indicated as ** p ≤ 0.01** compared to control; ### p ≤ 0.001 and ## p ≤ 0.01 compared to LPS and $$$ p ≤ 0.001$ and $$ p ≤ 0.01$ compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Effect of Schot or Spina treatment on the gene expression of *Abcd1* (**A**,**C**) and *Abcd2* (**B**,**D**) in *Wt* (**A**,**B**) and *Acox1*<sup>-/-</sup> (**C**,**D**) BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). Total RNA was isolated from BV-2 cells, and then the expression level of genes of interest was quantified by real-time RT-qPCR. All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increased mean signal indicated as *** p ≤ 0.001** compared to control; ## p ≤ 0.01 and # p ≤ 0.05** compared to LPS; and $$$ p ≤ 0.001$ and $$ p ≤ 0.01$ compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.7. Effect of Schot and Spina on the Expression of Inflammation-Marker-Encoding Genes

In response to LPS treatment, the mRNA expression levels of *Tnf-α* and *iNos* were increased by more than 3 and 20 folds, respectively, in the microglial *Wt* cells (Figure 9A,B). The combined treatments of Schot–LPS and Spina–LPS at both concentrations significantly
attenuated the LPS-induced *Tnf-α* and *iNos* mRNA level increases (Figure 9A,B). In the *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cell line, the cotreatments of Schot–LPS and Spina–LPS limited the increased mRNA levels of *Tnf-α* and *iNos* (Figure 9C,D).

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

**Figure 9.** Effect of Schot and Spina treatments on the gene expression of the proinflammatory markers *Tnf-α* (**A**,**C**) and *iNos* (**B**,**D**) in *Wt* (**A**,**B**) and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ (**C**,**D**) BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). Total RNA was isolated from BV-2 cells, and then the expression level of genes of interest was quantified by real-time RT-qPCR. All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increased mean signal indicated as ** *p* ≤ 0.01 compared to control; ### *p* ≤ 0.01 and # *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to LPS; $$ *p* ≤ 0.01 and $$$ *p* ≤ 0.001 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.

In addition to the enhancement of *Tnf-α* and *iNos* gene expression, LPS also strongly increased the mRNA level of the proinflammatory cytokine *Il-1β* in both the *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cell lines. These LPS-dependent increases were significantly attenuated by cotreatment with Schot or Spina at both concentrations (Figure 10A,B). In contrast, treatment with Schot or Spina alone, at both concentrations, had no effect on *Il-1β* expression in the *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cell lines when compared to the control cells (Figure 10A,B). On the other hand, we also evaluated the gene expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine *Il-4*. The obtained data revealed that Schot and Spina treatment increased the *Il-4* mRNA expression in the *Wt* cells but not in the *Acox1*⁻/⁻ cells (Figure 10C,D). However, the LPS-reduced levels of *Il-4* mRNA in both cell lines were partially but significantly rescued by Schot and Spina treatment at concentrations of 1 and 2.5 µM (Figure 10C,D).
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Effect of Schot and Spina treatment on the gene expression of the proinflammatory marker *Il-β* (**A,B**) and the anti-inflammatory marker *Il-4* (**C,D**) in the *Wt* (**A,C**) and *Acox1<sup>-/-</sup>* (**B,D**) BV-2 microglial cells. Cells were incubated for 24 h with Schot or Spina (1 or 2.5 µM) in the absence or presence of LPS (1 µg/mL). Total RNA was isolated from BV-2 cells, and then the expression level of genes of interest was quantified by real-time RT-qPCR. All values are presented as means ± SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicate, with the statistical significance of the increased mean signal indicated as *** *p* ≤ 0.001 and * *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to control; ### *p* ≤ 0.01 and compared to LPS; and $$ *p* ≤ 0.001 and * *p* ≤ 0.05 compared to the different treatments with or without LPS administration. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons.</figcaption></figure>

**4. Discussion**

Microglial cells are considered resident macrophages in the central nervous system, and they play a key role in brain infections and inflammation [44]. The chronic activation of microglial cells induces neuronal damage and loss, which lead to the development of several neurodegenerative diseases [45]. The control of microglia activation has a pivotal role in blocking the development of neurodegenerative disorders and attenuating their progression [46]. In recent decades, plant-derived compounds with pharmacological activities have received considerable attention from researchers as a potential source of new alternative drugs for treating neurological disorders.

In this study, we evaluated the effect of two phytosterols, Schot and Spina, on LPS-induced inflammation in Wt and *Acox1<sup>-/-</sup>* murine microglia BV-2 cell lines. Here, we showed that at low concentrations, Schot and Spina had no effect on Wt and *Acox1<sup>-/-</sup>* BV-2 viability. Accordingly, in a previous study, we showed that Schot and Spina from argan oil were not toxic to microglial BV-2 cells and could impact the mitochondrial membrane potential [22]. However, we noted and confirmed that the viability of both cell lines was significantly altered by 7-KC treatment, which may lead to cell death by oxiapophagy, including oxidative stress and the induction of death by apoptosis associated with autophagy [47].

Furthermore, we evaluated the total ROS production by H₂DCFDA, which is largely used as a hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-specific probe but can detect a wide range of ROS, such
as superoxide anions (O2•−), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [48]. We also used the DHE probe to detect superoxide radicals. Mitochondrial respiration represents the main source of superoxides, which are the principal ROS in the central nervous system [49]. Our results revealed the strong enhancement of ROS production by Wt BV-2 microglial cells in response to LPS treatment. The activation of microglia by LPS, which triggers high ROS production [50], may initiate apoptosis and disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB), leading to brain function damage that may be irreversible [51]. Oxidative stress has been widely implicated in the development of several neurodegenerative disorders [52–54]. The increased ROS generation was significantly inhibited by both phytosterols (Schot and Spina). In their study, Yoshida and Niki showed that phytosterols chemically act as antioxidants and radical scavengers [55]. Moreover, both Schot and Spina attenuated the activity and mRNA and protein expression of catalase induced by LPS. Catalase constitutes the main peroxisomal antioxidant H2O2-degrading enzyme, and the perturbation of catalase activity is related to many neurodegenerative diseases [56]. The regulation of catalase expression is controlled at both the mRNA and protein levels. The control of catalase activity can also be related to its post-translational modifications. CAT activity is increased by phosphorylation at Ser167 by protein kinase C delta [57] or at both Tyr231 and Tyr386 by the Abelson tyrosine-protein kinases ABL1 and ABL2 [58]. Further, we have previously shown that argan oil regulates the mRNA level and activity of catalase induced by LPS in the mice brain [20]. The high content of Schot and Spina in argan oil suggests that they may act as antioxidants, preventing H2O2 microglial accumulation and modulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes, which also act as ROS scavengers [59,60].

Furthermore, we revealed that LPS treatment increased, in both Wt and Acox1<sup>-/-</sup> BV-2 cells, NO release in the culture medium concomitantly with the increased mRNA and protein expression of iNOS. Under normal conditions, iNOS is weakly expressed in the brain. However, after LPS treatment, microglial cells constitute the main source of iNOS and NO [61,62]. NO, produced by iNOS, plays a key signaling role in neurotransmission and neuroinflammation and mediates neuron and glial cell interactions in the brain [62]. The NO released from activated microglia inhibits the reuptake of glutamate at the presynaptic site, blocking the activation of N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and leading to neuronal death [63]. Our results were in accordance with the previous reports suggesting that phytosterols decrease NO production [64].

Lipid metabolism, including peroxisomal metabolism, is crucial for neuronal development, synaptic plasticity, and microglial function [65,66]. The perturbation of lipid metabolism at the level of synthesis, transport, or catabolism contributes to the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease [67], Parkinson's disease [68], and peroxisomal leukodystrophies [69]. ACOX1 deficiency is a severe peroxisomal neurological disorder with early developmental regression, a loss of vision and hearing, and death between 4 and 10 years of age [70]. ACOX1 deficiency causes an accumulation of VLCFA and glial loss within the brain [70,71]. ACOX1 is known as the rate-limiting enzyme of peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation [72]. Here, we showed that the LPS treatment of microglial Wt cells downregulated ACOX1 expression at the enzymatic level but not at the mRNA level. Such results are in accordance with previously reported data in mice livers [73]. Such a discrepancy between translational and transcriptional regulation can be explained by differences in mRNA and protein decay rates, while abnormal translation can accelerate mRNA decay [74]. The control of protein translation is governed by the PERK/eIF2α-P/ATF4 signaling axis, which abrogates the decline in protein synthesis during endoplasmic reticulum stress initiated by LPS [75]. Furthermore, LPS has been reported to reduce Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) expression and activity through TLR4 [76]. Interestingly, the knockdown of deacetylase SIRT3 led to the downregulation of ACOX1 activity. Such SIRT3-dependent ACOX1 regulation was shown to involve an interaction between Heat shock protein 70 and ACOX1 [77].

VLCFA-CoA esters are imported into the peroxisome thanks to two ABCD transporters (i.e., ABCD1 and ABCD2). Notably, ABCD1 deficiency is the principal cause of
the inherited peroxisomal disorder X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD), associated with neurodegeneration and inflammatory cerebral demyelination [17]. ABCD2 is a sterol-regulatory-element-binding protein target gene, and its gene expression is induced by sterols [78]. Here, we revealed that both phytosterols, Schot and Spina, induced *Abcd2* gene expression and were able to counteract the negative effect of LPS. The ABCD2 gene is the closest homolog of ABCD1 [69], and its upregulation compensates for ABCD1 deficiency in X-ALD skin fibroblasts [79,80]. This functional redundancy has been investigated as a new alternative pharmacotherapy for X-ALD [81,82]. Interestingly, Nomaguchi et al. showed that *Aloe vera* phytosterols activated mouse hepatic PPARα and its target genes, including *Acox1*, in a dose-dependent manner [83]. The activation of PPARα is dependent on several factors (fatty acids, hormone release, cytokines, and growth factors) [84]. In addition, certain natural ligands, such as the polyphenolic compound resveratrol, ferulic acid, and the oxidized derivative of campesterol, are active biological modulators of several signaling proteins, including PPARα [16,85,86]. PPARα regulates target genes that are involved in glucose and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation, as well as signaling pathways modulating inflammation [61]. Recently, Spinasterol was demonstrated to increase the protein expression of PPARγ [87] and stigmasterol-attenuated inflammation through the butyrate-PPARγ axis [88]. PPARs exert their anti-inflammatory effect through inhibiting the gene expression of the proinflammatory transcription factors, including the signal transducer and activator of transcription activator protein-1 and nuclear factor NF-κB [62].

LPS-activated microglia cells also express other inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β and TNF-α, which promote proinflammatory cytokine generation [89]. We revealed that Schot and Spina significantly attenuated, in both *Wt* and *Acox1*⁻/⁻ BV-2 microglial cell lines, the LPS-induced mRNA expression of *Tnf-α* and *Il-1β*. Several studies have reported that LPS-stimulated microglia induced the production of inflammatory mediators, such as NO, TNF-α, and IL-1β [90]. However, during acute inflammation, TNF-α plays a critical role in restoring brain homeostasis, fighting against brain injury and neurodegeneration [63].

In our experiments, cotreatment with Schot or Spina attenuated the LPS-induced expression of the inflammatory mediators *Tnf-α* and *Il-1β*. These results indicated that Schot and Spina had anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated BV2 microglial cells. Interestingly, the LXR nuclear receptors, considered as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling [64], can be modulated by phytosterols, including Schot and Spina [22]. Additionally, sitosterol, as with several other phytosterols, triggers an anti-inflammatory response by downregulating several components (i.e., NO, *iNos*, and *Tnf-α*) of the TLR4 pathway [91]. In a clinical trial, Kurano et al. [92] highlighted the negative correlation between sitosterol levels and circulating TNF-α and IL-6 levels. In our study, we also found that Schot and Spina partially but significantly re-established the LPS-reduced expression *Il-4* mRNA. As a pleiotropic anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-4 controls brain homeostasis, including tissue repair and cellular protection, upon microglia activation in neuroinflammation [93]. IL-4 suppresses the liberation of the pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and NO [94,95]. In addition, in vitro and in vivo, IL-4 can cause activated microglia to move towards a regenerative and anti-inflammatory phenotype [96,97].

**5. Conclusions**

Collectively, our data highlighted the protective effects of the AO phytosterols Schotenol and Spinasterol against LPS-induced microglia oxidative stress, inflammation, and peroxisome dysfunction through lowering oxidative and nitrosative stress and pro-inflammatory gene expression and normalizing the peroxisomal antioxidant catalase expression and fatty acid β-oxidation functions. Our results may provide new evidence supporting the health-promoting properties of argan oil's bioactive molecules, including the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of phytosterols.
**Author Contributions:** S.E. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. M.S. chemically synthesized and characterized the Spinasterol and Schottenol compounds. C.G., S.S., J.V., G.L., R.E.K., N.L., A.B., B.N., M.C.-M. and P.A. analyzed and discussed the data and reviewed the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded by the Ministère de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche and the CNRST. The Action Intégrée of the Comité Mixte Inter-universitaire Franco-Marocain (n° TBK 19/92 n° Campus France: 41501RJ) from the PHC Toubkal program, Ministère des Affaires Étrangères, the Ministère de l'enseignement et de la Recherche.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Data are contained within the article.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Salvi, J.; Andreoletti, P.; Audinat, E.; Balland, E.; Ben Fradj, S.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M.; Heurtaux, T.; Liénard, F.; Nédélec, E.; Rovère, C.; et al. Microgliosis: A Double-Edged Sword in the Control of Food Intake. *FEBS J.* **2022**, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Javanmehr, N.; Saleki, K.; Alijanizadeh, P.; Rezaei, N. Microglia Dynamics in Aging-Related Neurobehavioral and Neuroinflammatory Diseases. *J. Neuroinflamm.* **2022**, *19*, 273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Powers, J.M.; DeCiero, D.P.; Ito, M.; Moser, A.B.; Moser, H.W. Adrenomyeloneuropathy: A Neuropathologic Review Featuring Its Noninflammatory Myelopathy. *J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.* **2000**, *59*, 89–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Von Bernhardi, R.; Eugenín-Von Bernhardi, L.; Eugenín, J. Microglial Cell Dysregulation in Brain Aging and Neurodegeneration. *Front. Aging Neurosci.* **2015**, *7*, 124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Cunningham, C. Microglia and Neurodegeneration: The Role of Systemic Inflammation. *Glia* **2013**, *61*, 71–90. [CrossRef]

6. Pawate, S.; Shen, Q.; Fan, F.; Bhat, N.R. Redox Regulation of Glial Inflammatory Response to Lipopolysaccharide and Interferongamma. *J. Neurosci. Res.* **2004**, *77*, 540–551. [CrossRef]

7. Perry, V.H.; Teeling, J. Microglia and Macrophages of the Central Nervous System: The Contribution of Microglia Priming and Systemic Inflammation to Chronic Neurodegeneration. *Semin. Immunopathol.* **2013**, *35*, 601–612. [CrossRef]

8. Konsman, J.P.; Parnet, P.; Dantzer, R. Cytokine-Induced Sickness Behaviour: Mechanisms and Implications. *Trends Neurosci.* **2002**, *25*, 154–159. [CrossRef]

9. Vilhardt, F.; Haslund-Vinding, J.; Jaquet, V.; McBean, G. Microglia Antioxidant Systems and Redox Signalling. *Br. J. Pharmacol.* **2017**, *174*, 1719–1732. [CrossRef]

10. Li, J.; Baud, O.; Vartanian, T.; Volpe, J.J.; Rosenberg, P.A. Peroxynitrite Generated by Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and NADPH Oxidase Mediates Microglial Toxicity to Oligodendrocytes. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2005**, *102*, 9936–9941. [CrossRef]

11. Liu, B.; Du, L.; Hong, J.S. Naloxone Protects Rat Dopaminergic Neurons against Inflammatory Damage through Inhibition of Microglia Activation and Superoxide Generation. *J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.* **2000**, *293*, 607–617. [PubMed]

12. Wang, T.; Liu, B.; Qin, L.; Wilson, B.; Hong, J.S. Protective Effect of the SOD/Catalase Mimetic MnTMPyP on Inflammation-Mediated Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in Mesencephalic Neuronal-Glial Cultures. *J. Neuroimmunol.* **2004**, *147*, 68–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Nell, H.J.; Au, J.L.; Giordano, C.R.; Terlecky, S.R.; Walton, P.A.; Whitehead, S.N.; Cechetto, D.F. Targeted Antioxidant, Catalase-SKL, Reduces Beta-Amyloid Toxicity in the Rat Brain. *Brain Pathol.* **2017**, *27*, 86–94. [CrossRef]

14. Wanders, R.J.A. Peroxisomal Disorders: Improved Laboratory Diagnosis, New Defects and the Complicated Route to Treatment. *Mol. Cell Probes* **2018**, *40*, 60–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Fujiki, Y.; Abe, Y.; Imoto, Y.; Tanaka, A.J.; Okumoto, K.; Honsho, M.; Tamura, S.; Miyata, N.; Yamashita, T.; Chung, W.K.; et al. Recent Insights into Peroxisome Biogenesis and Associated Diseases. *J. Cell Sci.* **2020**, *133*, jcs236943. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Tahri-Joutey, M.; Andreoletti, P.; Surapureddi, S.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M.; Latruffe, N. Mechanisms Mediating the Regulation of Peroxisomal Fatty Acid Beta-Oxidation by PPARα. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2021**, *22*, 8969. [CrossRef]

17. Singh, I.; Pujol, A. Pathomechanisms Underlying X-Adrenoleukodystrophy: A Three-Hit Hypothesis. *Brain Pathol.* **2010**, *20*, 838–844. [CrossRef]

18. Raas, Q.; Gondcaille, C.; Hamon, Y.; Leoni, V.; Caccia, C.; Menetrier, F.; Lizard, G.; Trompier, D.; Savary, S. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of Abcd1 and Abcd2 Genes in BV-2 Cells: Novel Microglial Models for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids* **2019**, *1864*, 704–714. [CrossRef]

19. Raas, Q.; Saih, F.E.; Gondcaille, C.; Trompier, D.; Hamon, Y.; Leoni, V.; Caccia, C.; Nasser, B.; Jadot, M.; Menetrier, F.; et al. A Microglial Cell Model for Acyl-CoA Oxidase 1 Deficiency. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids* **2019**, *1864*, 567–576. [CrossRef]
20. Essadek, S.; Bouchab, H.; El Kebbaj, R.; Gondcaille, C.; El Kamouni, S.; Savary, S.; Vamecq, J.; Essamadi, A.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M.; Nasser, B.; et al. Effects of a Short-Term Lipopolysaccharides Challenge on Mouse Brain and Liver Peroxisomal Antioxidant and β-Oxidative Functions: Protective Action of Argan Oil. *Pharmaceuticals* **2022**, *15*, 465. [CrossRef]

21. Badreddine, A.; Zarrouk, A.; Karym, E.M.; Debbabi, M.; Nury, T.; Meddeb, W.; Sghaier, R.; Bezine, M.; Vejux, A.; Martine, L.; et al. Argan Oil-Mediated Attenuation of Organelle Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress and Cell Death Induced by 7-Ketocholesterol in Murine Oligodendrocytes 158N. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2017**, *18*, 2220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. El Kherrassi, Y.; Samadi, M.; Lopez, T.; Nury, T.; El Kebbaj, R.; Andreoletti, P.; El Hajj, H.I.; Vamecq, J.; Moustaid, K.; Latruffe, N.; et al. Biological Activities of Schottenol and Spinasterol, Two Natural Phytosterols Present in Argan Oil and in Cactus Pear Seed Oil, on Murine Miroglial BV2 Cells. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **2014**, *446*, 798–804. [CrossRef]

23. Lin, Y.; Knol, D.; Trautwein, E.A. Phytosterol Oxidation Products (POP) in Foods with Added Phytosterols and Estimation of Their Daily Intake: A Literature Review. *Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol.* **2016**, *118*, 1423–1438. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Jones, P.J.; MacDougall, D.E.; Ntanios, F.; Vanstone, C.A. Dietary Phytosterols as Cholesterol-Lowering Agents in Humans. *Can J. Physiol. Pharm.* **1997**, *75*, 217–227. [CrossRef]

25. El Kherrassi, Y.; Maata, N.; Mazri, M.A.; El Kamouni, S.; Talbi, M.; El Kebbaj, R.; Moustaid, K.; Essamadi, A.K.; Andreoletti, P.; El Mzouri, E.H.; et al. Chemical and Phytochemical Characterizations of Argan Oil (Argania spinosa L. Skeels), Olive Oil (Olea europaea L. Cv. Moroccan Picholine), Cactus Pear (Opuntia Megacantha Salm-Dyck) Seed Oil and Cactus Cladode Essential Oil. *J. Food Meas. Charact.* **2018**, *12*, 747–754. [CrossRef]

26. Mukherjee, P.K. Chapter 20—Phyto-Pharmaceuticals, Nutraceuticals and Their Evaluation. In *Quality Control and Evaluation of Herbal Drugs*; Mukherjee, P.K., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 707–722. ISBN 978-0-12-813374-3.

27. Yuan, L.; Zhang, F.; Shen, M.; Jia, S.; Xie, J. Phytosterols Suppress Phagocytosis and Inhibit Inflammatory Mediators via ERK Pathway on LPS-Triggered Inflammatory Responses in RAW264.7 Macrophages and the Correlation with Their Structure. *Foods* **2019**, *8*, 582. [CrossRef]

28. Hayes, K.C.; Pronczuk, A.; Perlman, D. Nonesterified Phytosterols Dissolved and Recrystallized in Oil Reduce Plasma Cholesterol in Gerbils and Humans. *J. Nutr.* **2004**, *134*, 1395–1399. [CrossRef]

29. Varady, K.A.; Houweling, A.H.; Jones, P.J.H. Effect of Plant Sterols and Exercise Training on Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis in Previously Sedentary Hypercholesterolemic Subjects. *Transl. Res.* **2007**, *149*, 22–30. [CrossRef]

30. Moghadasian, M.H. Pharmacological Properties of Plant Sterols in Vivo and in Vitro Observations. *Life Sci.* **2000**, *67*, 605–615. [CrossRef]

31. Arisawa, M.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Cordell, G.A.; Phoebe, C.H.; Fansworth, N.R. Plant Anticancer Agents. XXXVI. Schottenol Glucoside from Baccharis Coridifolia and Ipomopsis Aggregata. *Planta Med.* **1985**, *6*, 544–545. [CrossRef]

32. Berger, A.; Jones, P.J.H.; Abumweis, S.S. Plant Sterols: Factors Affecting Their Efficacy and Safety as Functional Food Ingredients. *Lipids Health Dis.* **2004**, *3*, 5. [CrossRef]

33. Huang, Y.-C.; Wen, Z.-H.; Wang, S.-K.; Hsu, C.-H.; Duh, C.-Y. New Anti-Inflammatory 4-Methylated Steroids from the Formosan Soft Coral Nephthea Chabroli. *Steroids* **2008**, *73*, 1181–1186. [CrossRef]

34. Blasi, E.; Barluzzi, R.; Bocchini, V.; Mazzolla, R.; Bistoni, F. Immortalization of Murine Microglial Cells by a V-Raf/v-Myc Carrying Retrovirus. *J. Neuroimmunol.* **1990**, *27*, 229–237. [CrossRef]

35. Badreddine, A.; Karym, E.M.; Zarrouk, A.; Nury, T.; El Kherrassi, Y.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui Malki, M.; Lizard, G.; Samadi, M. An Expeditious Synthesis of Spinasterol and Schottenol, Two Phytosterols Present in Argan Oil and in Cactus Pear Seed Oil, and Evaluation of Their Biological Activities on Cells of the Central Nervous System. *Steroids* **2015**, *99*, 119–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36. Mosmann, T. Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays. *J. Immunol. Methods* **1983**, *65*, 55–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

37. Green, L.C.; Wagner, D.A.; Glogowski, J.; Skipper, P.L.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. Analysis of Nitrate, Nitrite, and [15N]Nitrate in Biological Fluids. *Anal. Biochem.* **1982**, *126*, 131–138. [CrossRef]

38. Yazdani, M. Concerns in the Application of Fluorescent Probes DCDHF-DA, DHR 123 and DHE to Measure Reactive Oxygen Species in Vitro. *Toxicol. In Vitro* **2015**, *30*, 578–582. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

39. Ni, J.; Sasaki, Y.; Tokuyama, S.; Sogabe, A.; Tahara, Y. Conversion of a Typical Catalase from Bacillus Sp. TE124 to a Catalase-Peroxidase by Directed Evolution. *J. Biosci. Bioeng.* **2002**, *93*, 31–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

40. Oaxaca-Castillo, D.; Andreoletti, P.; Vluggens, A.; Yu, S.; Van Veldhoven, P.P.; Reddy, J.K.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Biochemical Characterization of Two Functional Human Liver Acyl-CoA Oxidase Isoforms 1a and 1b Encoded by a Single Gene. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **2007**, *360*, 314–319. [CrossRef]

41. Remans, T.; Keunen, E.; Bex, G.J.; Smeets, K.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Reliable Gene Expression Analysis by Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR: Reporting and Minimizing the Uncertainty in Data Accuracy. *Plant Cell* **2014**, *26*, 3829–3837. [CrossRef]

42. Yang, C.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, H.; Shimoda, L.A.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Semenza, G.L. Analysis of Hypoxia-Induced Metabolic Reprogramming. *Methods Enzymol.* **2014**, *542*, 425–455. [CrossRef]

43. Laroux, F.S.; Pavlick, K.P.; Hines, I.N.; Kawachi, S.; Harada, H.; Bharwani, S.; Hoffman, J.M.; Grisham, M.B. Role of Nitric Oxide in Inflammation. *Acta Physiol. Scand.* **2001**, *173*, 113–118. [CrossRef]
44. Graeber, M.B. Microglia. In *Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences*; Aminoff, M.J., Daroff, R.B., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 137–140. ISBN 978-0-12-226870-0.

45. Saliba, S.W.; Jauch, H.; Gargouri, B.; Keil, A.; Hurrle, T.; Volz, N.; Mohr, F.; Van Der Stelt, M.; Bräse, S.; Fiebich, B.L. Anti-Neuroinflammatory Effects of GPR55 Antagonists in LPS-Activated Primary Microglial Cells. *J. Neuroinflamm. 2018*, *15*, 322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

46. Subhramanyam, C.S.; Wang, C.; Hu, Q.; Dheen, S.T. Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. *Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.* **2019**, *94*, 112–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

47. Nury, T.; Yammine, A.; Ghzaiel, I.; Sassi, K.; Zarrouk, A.; Brahmi, F.; Samadi, M.; Rup-Jacques, S.; Vervandier-Fasseur, D.; Pais de Barros, J.P.; et al. Attenuation of 7-Ketocholesterol- and 7β-Hydroxycholesterol-Induced Oxiapoptophagy by Nutrients, Synthetic Molecules and Oils: Potential for the Prevention of Age-Related Diseases. *Ageing Res. Rev.* **2021**, *68*, 101324. [CrossRef]

48. Kaur, N.; Dhawan, M.; Sharma, I.; Pati, P.K. Interdependency of Reactive Oxygen Species Generating and Scavenging System in Salt Sensitive and Salt Tolerant Cultivars of Rice. *BMC Plant Biol.* **2016**, *16*, 131. [CrossRef]

49. Jelinek, M.; Jurajda, M.; Duris, K. Oxidative Stress in the Brain: Basic Concepts and Treatment Strategies in Stroke. *Antioxidants* **2021**, *10*, 1886. [CrossRef]

50. More, G.K.; Makola, R.T. In-Vitro Analysis of Free Radical Scavenging Activities and Suppression of LPS-Induced ROS Production in Macrophage Cells by Solanum Sisymbriifolium Extracts. *Sci. Rep.* **2020**, *10*, 6493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

51. Qu, J.; Chen, W.; Hu, R.; Feng, H. The Injury and Therapy of Reactive Oxygen Species in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Looking at Mitochondria. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2016**, *2016*, 2592935. [CrossRef]

52. Andersen, J.K. Oxidative Stress in Neurodegeneration: Cause or Consequence? *Nat. Med.* **2004**, *10*, S18–S25. [CrossRef]

53. Cenini, G.; Lloret, A.; Cascella, R. Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From a Mitochondrial Point of View. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2019**, *2019*, 2105607. [CrossRef]

54. Halliwell, B. Oxidative Stress and Neurodegeneration: Where Are We Now? *J. Neurochem.* **2006**, *97*, 1634–1658. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

55. Yoshida, Y.; Niki, E. Antioxidant Effects of Phytosterol and Its Components. *J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol.* **2003**, *49*, 277–280. [CrossRef]

56. Nandi, A.; Yan, L.-J.; Jana, C.K.; Das, N. Role of Catalase in Oxidative Stress- and Age-Associated Degenerative Diseases. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2019**, *2019*, 9613090. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

57. Rafikov, R.; Kumar, S.; Aggarwal, S.; Hou, Y.; Kangath, A.; Pardo, D.; Fineman, J.R.; Black, S.M. Endothelin-1 Stimulates Catalase Activity through the PKCδ-Mediated Phosphorylation of Serine 167. *Free Radic. Biol. Med.* **2014**, *67*, 255–264. [CrossRef]

58. Cao, C.; Leng, Y.; Kufe, D. Catalase Activity Is Regulated by C-Abl and Arg in the Oxidative Stress Response. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2003**, *278*, 29667–29675. [CrossRef]

59. Baskar, A.A.; Al Numair, K.S.; Gabriel Paulraj, M.; Alsaif, M.A.; Muamar, M.A.; Ignacimuthu, S. β-Sitosterol Prevents Lipid Peroxidation and Improves Antioxidant Status and Histoarchitecture in Rats with 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine-Induced Colon Cancer. *J. Med. Food* **2012**, *15*, 335–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

60. Vivancos, M.; Moreno, J.J. Beta-Sitosterol Modulates Antioxidant Enzyme Response in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. *Free Radic. Biol. Med.* **2005**, *39*, 91–97. [CrossRef]

61. Lefebvre, P.; Chinetti, G.; Fruchart, J.-C.; Staels, B. Sorting out the Roles of PPAR Alpha in Energy Metabolism and Vascular Homeostasis. *J. Clin. Invest.* **2006**, *116*, 571–580. [CrossRef]

62. Zhang, N.; Chu, E.S.H.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Liang, Q.; Chen, J.; Chen, M.; Teoh, N.; Farrell, G.; Sung, J.J.Y.; et al. Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha Inhibits Hepatocarcinogenesis through Mediating NF-KB Signaling Pathway. *Oncotarget* **2014**, *5*, 8330–8340. [CrossRef]

63. Shi, X.; Chen, Y.; Nadeem, L.; Xu, G. Beneficial Effect of TNF-α Inhibition on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. *J. Neuroinflamm.* **2013**, *10*, 69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

64. Zelcer, N.; Tontonoz, P. Liver X Receptors as Integrators of Metabolic and Inflammatory Signaling. *J. Clin. Investig.* **2006**, *116*, 607–614. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

65. Di Cara, F.; Savary, S.; Kovacs, W.J.; Kim, P.; Rachubinski, R.A. The Peroxisome: An up-and-Coming Organelle in Immunometabolism. *Trends Cell Biol.* **2022**, *33*, 70–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Jo, D.S.; Cho, D.-H. Peroxisomal Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases. *Arch. Pharm. Res.* **2019**, *42*, 393–406. [CrossRef]

67. Lizard, G.; Rouaud, O.; Demarquoy, J.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M.; Iuliano, L. Potential Roles of Peroxisomes in Alzheimer's Disease and in Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type. *J. Alzheimer's Dis.* **2012**, *29*, 241–254. [CrossRef]

68. Chen, Y.-C.; Wu, J.-S.; Tsai, H.-D.; Huang, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-J.; Sun, G.Y.; Lin, T.-N. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPAR-γ) and Neurodegenerative Disorders. *Mol. Neurobiol.* **2012**, *46*, 114–124. [CrossRef]

69. Trompier, D.; Vejux, A.; Zarrouk, A.; Gondcaille, C.; Geillon, F.; Nury, T.; Savary, S.; Lizard, G. Brain Peroxisomes. *Biochimie* **2014**, *98*, 102–110. [CrossRef]

70. Ferdinandusse, S.; Denis, S.; Hogenhout, E.M.; Koster, J.; Van Roermund, C.W.; IJlst, L.; Moser, A.B.; Wanders, R.J.; Waterham, H.R. Clinical, Biochemical, and Mutational Spectrum of Peroxisomal Acyl-Coenzyme A Oxidase Deficiency. *Hum. Mutat.* **2007**, *28*, 904–912. [CrossRef]
71. Griffin, E.N.; Ackerman, S.L. Lipid Metabolism and Axon Degeneration: An ACOX1 Balancing Act. *Neuron* **2020**, *106*, 551–553.
[CrossRef]

72. Inestrosa, N.C.; Bronfman, M.; Leighton, F. Detection of Peroxisomal Fatty Acyl-Coenzyme A Oxidase Activity. *Biochem. J.* **1979**, *182*, 779–788.
[CrossRef]

73. El Kebbaj, R.; Andreoletti, P.; El Hajj, H.I.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Vamecq, J.; Mandard, S.; Saih, F.E.; Latruffe, N.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Lizard, G.; et al. Argan Oil Prevents Down-Regulation Induced by Endotoxin on Liver Fatty Acid Oxidation and Gluconeogenesis and on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator-1α, (PGC-1α), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α (PPARα) and Estrogen r. *Biochimie Open* **2015**, *1*, 51–59.
[CrossRef]

74. Roy, B.; Jacobson, A. The Intimate Relationships of mRNA Decay and Translation. *Trends Genet.* **2013**, *29*, 691–699.
[CrossRef]

75. Guan, B.-J.; Krokowski, D.; Majumder, M.; Schmotzer, C.L.; Kimball, S.R.; Merrick, W.C.; Koromilas, A.E.; Hatzoglou, M. Translational Control during Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress beyond Phosphorylation of the Translation Initiation Factor EIF2α. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2014**, *289*, 12593–12611.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

76. Wang, X.; Yao, W.; Wang, M.; Zhu, J.; Xia, L. TLR4-SIRT3 Mechanism Modulates Mitochondrial and Redox Homeostasis and Promotes EPCs Recruitment and Survival. *Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.* **2022**, *2022*, 1282362.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

77. Song, Y.-F.; Zheng, H.; Luo, Z.; Hogstrand, C.; Bai, Z.-Y.; Wei, X.-L. Dietary Choline Alleviates High-Fat Diet-Induced Hepatic Lipid Dysregulation via UPRmt Modulated by SIRT3-Mediated MtHSP70 Deacetylation. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2022**, *23*, 4204.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

78. Weinhofer, I.; Kunze, M.; Rampler, H.; Bookout, A.L.; Forss-Petter, S.; Berger, J. Liver X Receptor Alpha Interferes with SREBP1c-Mediated Abcd2 Expression. Novel Cross-Talk in Gene Regulation. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2005**, *280*, 41243–41251.
[CrossRef]

79. Kemp, S.; Wei, H.M.; Lu, J.F.; Braiterman, L.T.; McGuinness, M.C.; Moser, A.B.; Watkins, P.A.; Smith, K.D. Gene Redundancy and Pharmacological Gene Therapy: Implications for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy. *Nat. Med.* **1998**, *4*, 1261–1268.
[CrossRef]

80. Netik, A.; Forss-Petter, S.; Holzinger, A.; Molzer, B.; Unterrainer, G.; Berger, J. Adrenoleukodystrophy-Related Protein Can Compensate Functionally for Adrenoleukodystrophy Protein Deficiency (X-ALD): Implications for Therapy. *Hum. Mol. Genet.* **1999**, *8*, 907–913.
[CrossRef]

81. Tawbeh, A.; Gondcaille, C.; Trompier, D. Peroxisomal ABC Transporters: An Update. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2021**, *22*, 6093.
[CrossRef]

82. Trompier, D.; Gondcaille, C.; Lizard, G.; Savary, S. Regulation of the Adrenoleukodystrophy-Related Gene (ABCD2): Focus on Oxysterols and LXR Antagonists. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **2014**, *446*, 651–655.
[CrossRef]

83. Nomaguchi, K.; Tanaka, M.; Misawa, E.; Yamada, M.; Toida, T.; Iwatsuki, K.; Goto, T.; Kawada, T. Aloe Vera Phytosterols Act as Ligands for PPAR and Improve the Expression Levels of PPAR Target Genes in the Livers of Mice with Diet-Induced Obesity. *Obes. Res. Clin. Pract.* **2011**, *5*, e190–e201.
[CrossRef]

84. Contreras, A.V.; Torres, N.; Tovar, A.R. PPAR-α as a Key Nutritional and Environmental Sensor for Metabolic Adaptation. *Adv. Nutr.* **2013**, *4*, 439–452.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

85. Fantacuzzi, M.; De Filippis, B.; Amoroso, R.; Giampietro, L. PPAR Ligands Containing Stilbene Scaffold. *Mini Rev. Med. Chem.* **2019**, *19*, 1599–1610.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

86. Ikeda, I.; Konno, R.; Shimizu, T.; Ide, T.; Takahashi, N.; Kawada, T.; Nagao, K.; Inoue, N.; Yanagita, T.; Hamada, T.; et al. Campest-5-En-3-One, an Oxidized Derivative of Campesterol, Activates PPARalpha, Promotes Energy Consumption and Reduces Visceral Fat Deposition in Rats. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **2006**, *1760*, 800–807.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

87. Lee, D.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kwon, H.C.; Kwon, J.; Jang, D.S.; Kang, K.S. Dual Beneficial Effects of α-Spinasterol Isolated from Aster Pseudoglehnii on Glucose Uptake in Skeletal Muscle Cells and Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Pancreatic β-Cells. *Plants* **2022**, *11*, 658.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

88. Wen, S.; He, L.; Zhong, Z.; Zhao, R.; Weng, S.; Mi, H.; Liu, F. Stigmasterol Restores the Balance of Treg/Th17 Cells by Activating the Butyrate-PPARγ Axis in Colitis. *Front Immunol.* **2021**, *12*, 741934.
[CrossRef]

89. Wilms, H.; Sievers, J.; Rickert, U.; Rostami-Yazdi, M.; Mrowietz, U.; Lucius, R. Dimethylfumarate Inhibits Microglial and Astrocytic Inflammation by Suppressing the Synthesis of Nitric Oxide, IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 in an in-Vitro Model of Brain Inflammation. *J. Neuroinflamm.* **2010**, *7*, 1–8.
[CrossRef]

90. Hoogland, I.C.M.; Houbolt, C.; Van Westerloo, D.J.; Van Gool, W.A.; Van de Beek, D. Systemic Inflammation and Microglial Activation: Systematic Review of Animal Experiments. *J. Neuroinflamm.* **2015**, *12*, 1–13.
[CrossRef]

91. Valerio, M.S.; Minderman, H.; Mace, T.; Awad, A.B. β-Sitosterol Modulates TLR4 Receptor Expression and Intracellular MyD88-Dependent Pathway Activation in J774A.1 Murine Macrophages. *Cell Immunol.* **2013**, *285*, 76–83.
[CrossRef]

92. Kurano, M.; Hasegawa, K.; Kunimi, M.; Hara, M.; Yatomi, Y.; Teramoto, T.; Tsukamoto, K. Sitosterol Prevents Obesity-Related Chronic Inflammation. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids* **2018**, *1863*, 191–198.
[CrossRef]

93. Walsh, J.T.; Hendrix, S.; Boato, F.; Smirnov, I.; Zheng, J.; Lukens, J.R.; Gadani, S.; Hechler, D.; Gölz, G.; Rosenberger, K.; et al. MHCII-Independent CD4+ T Cells Protect Injured CNS Neurons via IL-4. *J. Clin. Investig.* **2015**, *125*, 2547.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

94. Hühner, L.; Rilka, J.; Gilsbach, R.; Zhou, X.; Machado, V.; Spittau, B. Interleukin-4 Protects Dopaminergic Neurons In Vitro but Is Dispensable for MPTP-Induced Neurodegeneration In Vivo. *Front Mol. Neurosci.* **2017**, *10*, 62.
[CrossRef]

95. Park, K.W.; Lee, D.Y.; Joe, E.H.; Kim, S.U.; Jin, B.K. Neuroprotective Role of Microglia Expressing Interleukin-4. *J. Neurosci. Res.* **2005**, *81*, 397–402.
[CrossRef]
96. Casella, G.; Garzetti, L.; Gatta, A.T.; Finardi, A.; Maiorino, C.; Ruffini, F.; Martino, G.; Muzio, L.; Furlan, R. IL4 Induces IL6-Producing M2 Macrophages Associated to Inhibition of Neuroinflammation in Vitro and in Vivo. *J. Neuroinflamm.* **2016**, *13*, 139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

97. Spittau, B. Interleukin 4-Induced Neuroprotection and Regulation of Microglia Activation as a Therapeutic Approach in the MPTP Model of Parkinson's Disease. *Neural Regen. Res.* **2017**, *12*, 1433–1434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.