# Biogenesis of omegasomes and autophagosomes in mammalian autophagy

Puck N Norell, Daniele Campisi, Jagan Mohan Hiriyur Doreswamy Kander, Thomas Wollert

► To cite this version:

Puck N Norell, Daniele Campisi, Jagan Mohan Hiriyur Doreswamy Kander, Thomas Wollert. Biogenesis of omegasomes and autophagosomes in mammalian autophagy. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2024, 52 (5), pp.2145 - 2155. 10.1042/bst20240015. pasteur-05114517

HAL Id: pasteur-05114517

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-05114517v1

Submitted on 16 Jun 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

PORTLAND
PRESS

## Review Article

# Biogenesis of omegasomes and autophagosomes in mammalian autophagy

Puck N. Norell*, Daniele Campisi*, Jagan Mohan* and Thomas Wollert

Membrane Biochemistry and Transport, Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, UMR3691 CNRS, 75015 Paris, France

**Correspondence:** Thomas Wollert (thomas.wollert@pasteur.fr)

OPEN

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

ACCESS

Autophagy is a highly conserved catabolic pathway that maintains cellular homeostasis by promoting the degradation of damaged or superfluous cytoplasmic material. A hallmark of autophagy is the generation of membrane cisternae that sequester autophagic cargo. Expansion of these structures allows cargo to be engulfed in a highly selective and exclusive manner. Cytotoxic stress or starvation induces the formation of autophagosomes that sequester bulk cytoplasm instead of selected cargo. This rather nonselective pathway is essential for maintaining vital cellular functions during adverse conditions and is thus a major stress response pathway. Both selective and nonselective autophagy rely on the same molecular machinery. However, due to the different nature of cargo to be sequestered, the involved molecular mechanisms are fundamentally different. Although intense research over the past decades has advanced our understanding of autophagy, fundamental questions remain to be addressed. This review will focus on molecular principles and open questions regarding the formation of omegasomes and phagophores in nonselective mammalian autophagy.

## Initiation of autophagy

Eukaryotic cells possess a highly efficient and adaptive mechanism to degrade unwanted or damaged cellular components, termed autophagy [1]. The biogenesis of autophagosomes starts with the formation of membrane cisternae, called phagophores, which sequester cytoplasmic material, enclose it, and transport it to lysosomes for degradation. In selective autophagy, the formation of phagophores is initiated by cargo, which serves as a platform for phagophore formation and expansion [2,3]. Consequently, cargo defines the size and shape of selective phagophores (Figure 1), requiring phagophore membranes to be flexible enough to engulf cargo by a zipper-like mechanism, while excluding cytoplasm and other cellular structures. In contrast, nonselective phagophores are free-standing membranes that engulf bulk cytoplasm. Because these phagophores lack structural support from cargo, their expansion needs to be co-ordinated by other mechanisms to ensure that a perfectly spherical vesicle, the autophagosome, can be formed (Figure 1). Therefore, nonselective phagophores need to possess entirely different physical properties compared with selective phagophores, being rigid enough to allow cytoplasm to be engulfed [4].

In mammalian cells, nonselective autophagy is initiated at specific domains of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) called omegasomes, whose shape resembles the Greek letter omega (Ω) [5]. Omegasomes can adopt cisternae-like or vesicular-tubular morphologies, suggesting that they possess structural plasticity [6–8]. Morphological studies of omegasomes using electron microscopy suggest that their membranes are continuous with the ER [5], a view that has recently been challenged by *in situ* cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) [7]. Omegasomes are enriched in PtdIns3P, and their major purpose is to promote the formation of cup-shaped phagophores by acting as platforms for phagophore nucleation [6].

<footnote>*These authors contributed equally to this work.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Selective and nonselective autophagy are distinct pathways.</figcaption></figure>

Cellular stress and starvation induce the formation of nonselective autophagosomes that mainly sequester bulk cytoplasm and ribosomes. The pathway ensures cellular survival under these adverse conditions and requires the formation of a free standing phagophore that expands in the absence of cargo. Cellular homeostasis is maintained by selective autophagy, that sequesters damaged or superfluous cellular material in double-membrane-bounded autophagosomes and delivers them to lysosomes for degradation. Autophagy receptors bind cargo and initiate autophagy and tether cargo to phagophore membranes by interacting with lipidated LC3. Both pathways rely on the autophagy core machinery, but their mode of action differs to meet different physical requirements of phagophores. Note that LC3 proteins are found on both faces of phagophores in selective and nonselective autophagy. The figure highlights one of the principal functions of LC3 proteins as scaffold component (nonselective) and cargo adaptor (selective autophagy).

Omegasome formation starts with the recruitment of the ULK1 complex (comprising ULK1/2 kinases, FIP200, ATG13, and ATG101) and PI3KC (comprising Beclin1, ATG14L, VPS34, and VPS15) to the ER. The process is induced by inactivation of mTORC1 in response to amino acid starvation, or by activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) due to glucose starvation [9]. In fed conditions, the mTORC1 complex phosphorylates serine residues in ATG13 and ULK1/2, suppressing the kinase activity of ULK1 and the recruitment of the ULK1 complex to the ER [10,11]. Starvation inactivates mTORC1, and the rapid dephosphorylation of ATG13 and ULK1/2 initiates autophagy. AMPK phosphorylates different residues in ULK1, thereby stimulating its kinase activity to promote autophagy [12]. The recruitment of ULK1 and PI3KC complexes enriches the ER in PtdIns3P and allows effector proteins, such as the canonical omegasome marker DFCP1 to be recruited [5,13]. The colocalization of ULK1 and PI3KC at the ER is accompanied by the recruitment of ATG9 vesicles which are thought to nucleate phagophores [14–16].

Although the autophagic machinery is highly conserved from yeast to humans, the molecular mechanisms of autophagy differ significantly. In yeast cells, phagophores do not emerge from the ER, but are assembled at specific sites of the vacuole at which clustering of the tethering protein Vac8 leads to the recruitment of the PI3K and the Atg1 kinase complexes [17,18]. Atg9 vesicles are recruited by Atg17 [19,20], which is a yeast-specific subunit of the Atg1 kinase complex. Tethering of Atg9 vesicles by Atg17 and subsequent fusion generates the phagophore precursor [21,22]. Furthermore, clustering of the Atg1 kinase complex by Vac8 activates the kinase activity of Atg1 to initiate autophagy [23].

## Dynamics and lipid sources

The formation of omegasomes occurs within 3 min, and autophagosomes are formed within 10 min [5,24,25]. The transient nature of autophagosome precursors makes it difficult to study the formation of autophagosomes
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

and the relationship between the ER, omegasomes, and phagophores. Interestingly, a small number of omegasomes give rise to a large number of autophagosomes, suggesting that several phagophores emerge from one omegasome [24]. The vast majority of cellular lipids are generated by the ER, suggesting that the ER is a principal source of lipids for the generation of autophagosomes [26]. However, several other sources, including recycling endosomes [27,28], the plasma membrane (PM) [29,30], the trans-Golgi network (TGN) [14], mitochondria [31], the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) [32,33], and ER exit sites (ERES) [34], also provide lipids for the biogenesis of phagophores (Figure 2). Recent studies have revealed that different vesicle populations merge to generate pre-autophagic structures, suggesting that vesicles provide, at least in part, lipids for phagophore expansion [35]. How such vesicles are generated, from which organelles they emerge, and whether certain cellular conditions induce the mobilization of lipids from distinct sources remain central questions in autophagy research.

Contact sites between organelles allow the dynamic exchange of lipids. Phagophores form such contacts with the ER (Figure 3a). Recent studies have revealed that ER-phagophore contact sites are established by the lipid transporter ATG2 [36–38]. ATG2 is a 16 nm-long tethering protein that possesses a central hydrophobic channel [39]. Its N-terminal Chorein domain binds the ER-resident lipid scramblases TMEM41B and VMP1 [40], while its C-terminus interacts with the phagophore-resident scramblase ATG9 [41]. Moreover, ATG2 forms a complex with the PtdIns3P-binding protein WIPI4, which supports targeting of ATG2 to PtdIns3P-enriched membranes of the phagophore [42,43]. This configuration suggests that ATG2 transports lipids between the ER and phagophores while the scramblases ensure an equal distribution of lipids between the two membrane leaflets. Recent *in vitro* reconstitution experiments demonstrated that ATG2 indeed transfers lipids between vesicles with an estimated transport rate of between 0.017 per second (s⁻¹) and 115 s⁻¹ [44,45].

Generating autophagosomes with a diameter of ~400 nm requires ~3 million lipids, which would require ~90 ATG2 molecules to provide enough lipids within 10 min [44]. This suggests that direct lipid transport by

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2. Membrane sources in nonselective autophagy.**</figcaption></figure>

Several organelles provide lipids for the nucleation and expansion of nonselective autophagosomes, including the endoplasmic reticulum (ER, a), ER-exit sites (ERES, b), COPII vesicles (c), the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC, d), ER-mitochondria contact sites (e), ER-plasma membrane contact sites (f), the plasma membrane (g), and the Trans-Golgi Network (TGN) as well as endocytic compartments (h).
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Omegasomes and their relationship to ER and phagophores.</figcaption></figure>

Omegasomes are platforms from which autophagosomes emerge in nonselective autophagy. (a) Previous studies reported that omegasomes are domains of the ER that act as platforms for the *de novo* formation of autophagosomes. Lipids required for the nucleation and expansion of phagophores are provided by vesicles or through direct lipid transfer from the ER and/or omegasomes by ATG2. (b) Recent studies suggested that omegasomes are not connected to the ER, indicating that they are cleaved off the ER after their formation. Phagophores may emerge by a budding mechanism through remodeling of omegasomal membranes. The ER can donate lipids by ATG2-mediated direct transfer. (c) Omegasomes might also form by vesicular fusion and through lipid transfer from the ER. Phagophore formation might occur by vesicular and ATG2 mediated lipid transfer. However, phagophores might also be derived from omegasomes (as shown in **b**). In this case, lipids would be delivered to omegasomes and used for the production of phagophores by remodeling.

ATG2 is supplemented by other lipid transport mechanisms, including vesicular transport. Moreover, the nature of the ER membrane, being heavily populated by integral and peripheral membrane proteins, needs to be considered. More than 50% of the mass of ER membranes is composed of proteins [46]. Phospholipids that
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

are in direct contact with transmembrane proteins are tightly bound, suggesting that a significant number of phospholipids are sequestered and cannot be extracted from the membrane. Consequently, these lipids are not available for any transport mechanisms. However, a potential lack of ER-resident lipids for phagophore expansion can be offset by an ‘on-demand’ synthesis. In fact, recent studies have revealed that Faa1 colocalizes with phagophores, channels activated fatty acids to phospholipid synthesis, and co-ordinates integration of phospholipids into phagophore membranes [47].

Taken together, three major lipid transport modalities appear to contribute lipids for autophagy, including vesicular transport, direct lipid transfer, and *de novo* lipid synthesis. The challenge for future studies will be to determine how many lipids are contributed by the different pathways and whether the flow of lipids through these pathways can be dynamically modulated in response to cellular and environmental cues.

## The role of the ER in autophagosome biogenesis

The most prominent domain of the ER from which nonselective autophagosomes emerge was discovered by Axe and colleagues more than 16 years ago [5]. Because of the characteristic shape of these peculiar ER domains, they have been called omegasomes (Figure 3). Despite intense research over the past decade, the molecular mechanism by which omegasomes are formed remains unknown. Their formation is initiated by the recruitment of the PI3KC and the ULK1 kinase complexes to the ER. The phosphorylation of PtdIns by PI3KC is a key step in the formation of omegasomes and results in the recruitment of DFCP1. A recent study revealed that DFCP1 is an ATPase that constricts omegasomes to release autophagosomes, suggesting that autophagosomes are derived by extrusion from the omegasome [48]. Moreover, DFCP1 regulates the biogenesis of lipid droplets [49], which in turn are involved in the formation of autophagosomes [50], implying that under certain conditions, lipid droplets can nurture phagophore expansion in a process co-ordinated by DFCP1.

Previous studies reported that omegasomes are continuous with the ER [8,51], suggesting that the formation of omegasomes occurs by budding from the ER membrane (Figure 3a). More recent developments in cryo-ET allow cellular structures to be preserved by cryo-fixation instead of classical methods, which involve chemical fixation and dehydration of samples. Using these techniques, contact sites between omegasome-like membrane cisternae and the ER have been frequently observed, while no continuous membrane bridges were identified, suggesting that omegasomes and phagophores are distinct entities that are not continuous with the ER [7,52,53] (Figure 3b,c). However, these contact sites were frequently populated by stick-like densities, and the length of these structures was in agreement with the length of ATG2, suggesting that ATG2 stabilizes contact sites between the ER and omegasomes (Figure 3b,c). Given that ATG2 is a lipid transporter, this observation also suggests that direct lipid transfer from the ER promotes the biogenesis of omegasomes.

The lack of membrane bridges between the ER and omegasomes also suggests that if omegasomes are subdomains of the ER, they need to be cleaved off the ER after they have been formed. Moreover, omegasomes and the ER have very distinct physical characteristics. The luminal distance between the inner and outer membrane of the omegasome is ~23 nm, which is much thinner than that of ER sheets or tubes. The intermembrane space of omegasomes is devoid of protein content, and canonical ER proteins do not colocalize with omegasomes [7]. Thus, if omegasomes are derived by remodeling of the ER, a yet to be identified highly specialized remodeling machinery would be required.

Another possibility is that omegasomes are nucleated by vesicular fusion and expanded by vesicular and ATG2-mediated lipid supply (Figure 3c). This possibility is supported by recent data showing that ATG16L1 and FIP200 vesicles undergo heterotypic fusion to form the HyPAS [35]. Interestingly, FIP200 vesicles are derived from the Golgi, while ATG16L1 vesicles emerge from recycling endosomes. In support of this scenario, earlier studies reported that ATG16L1 and ATG9 vesicles merge at recycling endosomes, and RAB11A-positive recycling endosomes serve as platforms for phagophore formation [27]. Whether the HyPAS or RAB11A-positive endosomes are related to omegasomes remains unclear, and further studies are needed to establish this relationship.

Not only the origin of omegasomes but also their relationship to phagophores remain controversial. The concept that omegasomes are platforms for the generation of phagophores was closely associated with the notion that phagophores are formed *de novo* by vesicular fusion involving vesicular carriers of various origins [15,27,29,33,54]. Recent *in vivo* cryo-ET studies characterized the morphology of phagophore rims and reported that they are in contact with omegasome-like structures distinct from ER cisternae (Figure 3c) [7]. Moreover, phagophore rims appear dilated and contain granular electron densities, which is not the case for rims of
omegasome-like structures [7,52,55], reinforcing the concept that omegasomes and phagophores are distinct, separate structures (Figure 3a,c).

Moreover, expanding phagophores are often associated with ER membranes, forming contact sites where autophagy regulators are recruited [56,57]. Notably, the lipid scramblase ATG9 and the lipid transfer complex comprising WIPI4 and ATG2 stabilize these contact sites [37,39,43], suggesting that the expansion of phago-phores involves direct lipid transfer from the ER (Figure 3a).

Taken together, the ER, omegasomes and phagophores appear to be separate and distinct structures. Both omegasomes and phagophores are connected to each other and to the ER by stick-like densities, suggesting that ATG2 stabilizes these contact sites and facilitates lipid transport between these structures. Moreover, experi-mental data support the notion that the nucleation of omegasomes and/or phagophores involves vesicular fusion (Figure 3c). The major difficulty in untangling the exact relationship between the ER, omegasomes, and phagophores remains their dynamic nature and close proximity, making it difficult to assign experimental data to the biogenesis of omegasomes or phagophores.

## ERES and ERGIC

ERESs are specialized regions of the ER where COPII vesicles form. There is mounting evidence that ERESs are important for autophagosome biogenesis (Figure 2b). ERESs may serve as structural platforms for the gener-ation of autophagosomes by promoting the formation of a COPII-derived compartment that recruits Atg9 and the PI3KC in yeast [34].

COPII vesicles are essential for transporting newly synthesized proteins from the ER to the Golgi, where pro-teins are sorted to their final destinations and most glycosylation reactions occur [55]. Several studies reported that COPII vesicles contribute to autophagosome biogenesis by delivering lipids to the expanding phagophore in *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* (Figure 2c) [33,54,58]. Trafficking of COPII vesicles to phagophores is co-ordinated by the membrane tethering complex TRAPPII and the small GTPase Ypt1 [34]. In mammalian cells, the ERGIC provides precursor membranes for the generation of autophagosomes (Figure 2d) [32,33]. Moreover, special contact sites between the ERGIC and ERESs promote the formation of COPII vesicles that act as phago-phore precursors [59]. Functional ERESs are maintained by the autophagy protein LC3C, which is conjugated to ER membranes and recruits TECPR2, which in turn promotes COPII vesicle formation through its inter-action with SEC24D. Mutations affecting TECPR2 function reduce COPII vesicle formation and inhibit autop-hagy, suggesting that the cooperation of LC3C and TECPR2 initiates autophagy by stabilizing ERESs [60]. Moreover, the recruitment of FIP200 to ERESs by SEC12 induces remodeling of ERESs, from which COPII vesicles emerge that are redirected to phagophores to promote autophagy [61]. Other autophagy-promoting COPII vesicles are derived from the ERGIC. They contain a specific combination of COPII components, including phosphorylated Sec23B and Sec24A/B [62]. The formation of specialized populations of COPII ves-icles during starvation allows cells to promote autophagy, while the budding of canonical COPII vesicles from conventional ERESs for protein secretion is suppressed.

## The role of ER contact sites in autophagy

Contact sites between the ER and mitochondria (ERMCSs) are essential for mitochondrial homeostasis by transferring phospholipids from the ER to mitochondria [63]. ERMCSs are also important signaling platforms, regulating the activity of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the oxidation of fatty acids [64,65]. Furthermore, ERMCSs serve as platforms for autophagosome biogenesis and provide lipids for phagophore expansion (Figure 2e). Depletion of the ERMCSs components MFN2 and voltage-dependent anion channel 1 inhibits autophagy, and activation of autophagy by starvation leads to the recruitment of ATG14, a component of PI3KC, and of ATG5 to ERMCSs [66,67]. ATG5 is a component of the E3-ligase complex that conjugates LC3 to the phospholipid phosphatidylethanolamine to promote autophagosome biogenesis. Mechanistically, starva-tion induces the dissociation of AMBRA1 from the anti-apoptotic mitochondrial protein Bcl-2, allowing AMBRA1 to interact with Beclin1 to initiate autophagy by activating PI3KC [68]. Moreover, MFN2, an essen-tial structural component of ERMCSs, interacts with AMPK [66]. Upon disruption of the calcium flux from the ER to mitochondria at ERMCSs, the mitochondrial pool of AMPK is activated, and AMPK phosphorylates and activates Beclin1 to initiate autophagy [69]. Another study reported that the mitochondrial outer mem-brane protein Miga recruits ATG14 to ERMCSs to promote the phosphorylation of PtdIns by activating PI3KC [70]. Furthermore, the TOMM40/70 complex recruits ATG2A and ATG9 to ERMCSs [71], suggesting that ERMCSs promote phagophore expansion through direct lipid supply.
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

Apart from mitochondria, the ER is also dynamically connected with the PM. ER-PM contact sites serve as platforms for the formation of autophagosomes [72,73], and the PM provides lipids for phagophore initiation and expansion (Figure 2f) [30]. ER-PM contact sites are mediated by tethering proteins such as E-Syt2 [74]. E-Syt2 interacts with the ER-resident protein VMP1, which promotes autophagy by interacting with the PI3KC subunit Beclin1 [75]. The recruitment of Beclin1 to ER-PM contact sites induces the formation of omegasomes, to which the PtdIns3P-binding proteins DFCP1 and WIPI2 are recruited [76]. Furthermore, PM-localized ATG16L1 is involved in the formation of pre-autophagic structures [30], suggesting that the expansion of phagophores at ER-PM contact sites is supported by lipids from the PM (Figure 2g). Another population of autophagic precursors, positive for ATG9A, can also form from the PM. The two populations of PM-derived autophagy precursors coalesce at recycling endosomes, which in turn promote autophagy by acting as platforms for the biogenesis of autophagosomes [77].

## Trans-Golgi and endocytic compartments

The Golgi is the central sorting station for proteins in the secretory pathway. Furthermore, most glycosylation reactions occur in the Golgi and they are essential for producing mature glycoproteins and glycolipids. The Golgi, and in particular the TGN, promote autophagy by supplying lipids for the nucleation and expansion of autophagosomes (Figure 2h) [78]. The TGN also harbors the lipid scramblase ATG9, which promotes autophagy by providing seeds for the nucleation of phagophores [16]. Upon autophagy induction by starvation, ATG9 exits the Golgi and is targeted to the ER where it co-operates with the ULK1 and the PI3KC complexes to produce omegasomes [79,80]. ATG9 has a very complex trafficking itinerary. It shuttles through endocytic compartments, including recycling endosomes and the PM, on its way to the phagophore assembly site [14,81,82]. Despite its essential function, ATG9 is not detected in phagophore membranes, suggesting that only a few molecules are incorporated [16].

## Phagophore formation by LC3B

The recruitment of LC3B to phagophores is a hallmark of nonselective autophagy, and its covalent attachment to phagophore lipids has been widely used to identify phagophore membranes and autophagosomes [83]. The conjugation of LC3B is mediated by a ubiquitin-like conjugation machinery, including the E1-like enzyme ATG7, the E2-like enzyme ATG3, and the E3-like ligase complex comprising the ATG12-ATG5 conjugate and ATG16L1 [84].

The conjugation of LC3B to phagophore membranes promotes phagophore expansion [85,86], and depletion of LC3B and its human paralogs results in the formation of smaller autophagosomes and a maturation defect [87]. Mechanistically, lipidated LC3B assembles with its E3-ligase complex into a membrane scaffold [88]. A similar activity has previously been described for the yeast LC3B homolog Atg8 [89,90]. Importantly, our recent *in vitro* reconstitutions demonstrated that the LC3B/ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 scaffold shapes model membranes into membrane cups that closely resemble phagophores in nonselective autophagy [88]. Interestingly, the formation of this scaffold also explains why the localization of ATG16L1 and ATG5 is restricted to the outer face of phagophores in mammalian cells [91,92]. The remodeling reaction required an intact coiled-coil region of ATG16L1, as well as its C-terminal unstructured region, while the C-terminal WD domain was dispensable [88]. Interestingly, previous studies reported several lipid binding sites in the N-terminal domain, the coiled-coil domain, and the C-terminal unstructured region of ATG16L1 [93,94]. These membrane-binding regions are indispensable for membrane remodeling by ATG16L1 *in vitro*. We also recently reported that cup-like membranes emerged from extended ER-PM contact sites *in vivo* [88] when ATG16L1 was directed to the PM by expressing WIPI2-CAAX [95]. This observation is significant because it implies that phagophores are formed by remodeling omegasome membranes. In this model (Figure 3b), omegasomes would not only be the platform for phagophore formation but also the primary lipid source. Phagophore and omegasome membranes would thus have the same origin, and lipids for autophagosome biogenesis would primarily be supplied to omegasomes, for example by ATG2-mediated transfer from the ER, vesicular transport, or de novo phospholipid synthesis. The challenging future task will be to determine how these three lipid delivery modalities are co-ordinated, whether their contribution is regulated by environmental or cellular cues, and whether lipids are mainly supplied to omegasomes, to phagophores, or to both.
## Perspectives

* Nonselective autophagy is a fundamental and highly conserved recycling pathway that allows cells to respond to cellular stress.

* Nonselective autophagosomes emerge from omegasomes, which are thought to be domains of the ER.

* Revealing the functional and structural relationship between omegasomes, phagophores and the ER remains to be addressed.

## Open Access

Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of Institut Pasteur in an all-inclusive *Read & Publish* agreement with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with Individual.

## Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

## Acknowledgements

We thank N'Toia Maynor for critically reading the manuscript and the French Research Agency for financial support (ANR grant ANR-22-CE13-0007-01).

## Abbreviations

AMBRA1, activating molecule in Beclin1-regulated autophagy protein 1; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ATG, autophagy-related; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2 protein; PI3KC, class III PtdIns3-kinase complex; COPII, coat protein complex II; cryo-ET, cryo-electron tomography; DFCP1, double FYVE containing protein 1; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERGIC, ER-Golgi intermediate compartment; ERMCS, ER-mitochondria contact site; E-Syt2, extended synaptotagmin 2; FIP200, FAK family kinase-interacting protein of 200 kDa; HyPAS, hybrid pre-autophagic structures; mTORC1, mammalian target of rapamycin kinase complex 1; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3; MFN2, Mitofusin 2; PtdIns, phosphatidylinositol; PM, plasma membrane; RAB11A, Ras-related protein 11A; TECPR2, Tectonin beta-propeller repeat-containing protein 2; TGN, trans-Golgi network; TMEM41B, transmembrane protein 41B; TRAPPII, transport protein particle II; ULK, Unc-51-like kinase; VPS, vacuolar sorting protein; VMP1, vacuole membrane protein 1; WIPI4, WD repeat domain PtdIns Interacting protein 4; Ypt1, yeast protein transport 1.

## References

1. Gómez-Virgilio, L., Silva-Lucero, M.-C., Flores-Morelos, D.-S., Gallardo-Nieto, J., Lopez-Toledo, G., Abarca-Fernandez, A.-M. et al. (2022) Autophagy: a key regulator of homeostasis and disease: an overview of molecular mechanisms and modulators. *Cells* **11**, 2262 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152262

2. Kirkin, V. and Rogov, V.V. (2019) A diversity of selective autophagy receptors determines the specificity of the autophagy pathway. *Mol. Cell* **76**, 268–285 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.005

3. Gubas, A. and Dikic, I. (2022) A guide to the regulation of selective autophagy receptors. *FEBS J.* **289**, 75–89 https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15824

4. Sakai, Y., Takahashi, S., Koyama-Honda, I., Saito, C. and Mizushima, N. (2024) Experimental determination and mathematical modeling of standard shapes of forming autophagosomes. *Nat. Commun.* **15**, 91 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44442-1

5. Axe, E.L., Walker, S.A., Manifava, M., Chandra, P., Roderick, H.L., Habermann, A. et al. (2008) Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. *J. Cell Biol.* **182**, 685–701 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200803137

6. Gudmundsson, S.R., Kallio, K.A., Vihinen, H., Jokitalo, E., Ktistakis, N. and Eskelinen, E.-L. (2022) Morphology of phagophore precursors by correlative light-electron microscopy. *Cells* **11**, 3080 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193080

7. Li, M., Tripathi-Giesgen, I., Schulman, B.A., Baumeister, W. and Wilfling, F. (2023) In situ snapshots along a mammalian selective autophagy pathway. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **110**, e2221712120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2221712120

8. Uemura, T., Yamamoto, M., Kametaka, A., Sou, Y.-., Yabashi, A., Yamada, A. et al. (2014) A cluster of thin tubular structures mediates transformation of the endoplasmic reticulum to autophagic isolation membrane. *Mol. Cell. Biol.* **34**, 1695–1706 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01327-13
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

9 Alers, S., Löffler, A.S., Wesselborg, S. and Stork, B. (2012) Role of AMPK-mTOR-Ulk1/2 in the regulation of autophagy: cross talk, shortcuts, and feedbacks. *Mol. Cell. Biol.* **32**, 2–11 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06159-11

10 Ganley, I.G., Lam, D.H., Lam, D.H., Wang, J., Ding, X., Chen, S. et al. (2009) ULK1.ATG13.FIP200 complex mediates mTOR signaling and is essential for autophagy. *J. Biol. Chem.* **284**, 12297–12305 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M900573200

11 Hosokawa, N., Hara, T., Kaizuka, T., Kishi, C., Takamura, A., Miura, Y. et al. (2009) Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1-Atg13-FIP200 complex required for autophagy. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **20**, 1981–1991 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1248

12 Egan, D.F., Shackelford, D.B., Mihaylova, M.M., Gelino, S., Kohnz, R.A., Mair, W. et al. (2011) Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. *Science* **331**, 456–461 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196371

13 Ridley, S.H., Ktistakis, N., Davidson, K., Anderson, K.E., Manifava, M., Ellson, C.D. et al. (2001) FENS-1 and DFCP1 are FYVE domain-containing proteins with distinct functions in the endosomal and Golgi compartments. *J. Cell Sci.* **114**, 3991–4000 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.114.22.3991

14 Young, A.R.J., Chan, E.Y.W., Hu, X.W., Köchl, R., Crawshaw, S.G., High, S. et al. (2006) Starvation and ULK1-dependent cycling of mammalian Atg9 between the TGN and endosomes. *J. Cell Sci.* **119**, 3888–3900 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03172

15 Orsi, A., Razi, M., Dooley, H.C., Robinson, D., Weston, A.E., Collinson, L.M. et al. (2012) Dynamic and transient interactions of Atg9 with autophagosomes, but not membrane integration, are required for autophagy. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **23**, 1860–1873 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e11-09-0746

16 Olivas, T.J., Wu, Y., Yu, S., Luan, L., Choi, P., Guinn, E.D. et al. (2023) ATG9 vesicles comprise the seed membrane of mammalian autophagosomes. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202208088 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202208088

17 Hitomi, K., Kotani, T., Noda, N.N., Kimura, Y. and Nakatogawa, H. (2023) The Atg1 complex, Atg9, and Vac8 recruit PI3K complex I to the pre-autophagosomal structure. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202210017 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202210017

18 Gatica, D., Wen, X., Cheong, H. and Klionsky, D.J. (2021) Vac8 determines phagophore assembly site vacuolar localization during nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy. *Autophagy* **17**, 1636–1648 https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1776474

19 Yamamoto, H., Fujioka, Y., Suzuki, S.W., Noshiro, D., Suzuki, H., Kondo-Kakuta, C. et al. (2016) The intrinsically disordered protein Atg13 mediates supramolecular assembly of autophagy initiation complexes. *Dev. Cell* **38**, 86–99 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.015

20 Sekito, T., Kawamata, T., Ichikawa, R., Suzuki, K. and Ohsumi, Y. (2009) Atg17 recruits Atg9 to organize the pre-autophagosomal structure. *Genes Cells* **14**, 525–538 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01299.x

21 Yamamoto, H., Kakuta, S., Watanabe, T.M., Kitamura, A., Sekito, T., Kondo-Kakuta, C. et al. (2012) Atg9 vesicles are an important membrane source during early steps of autophagosome formation. *J. Cell Biol.* **198**, 219–233 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201202061

22 Rao, Y., Perna, M.G., Hofmann, B., Beier, V. and Wollert, T. (2016) The Atg1-kinase complex tethers Atg9-vesicles to initiate autophagy. *Nat. Commun.* **7**, 10338 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10338

23 Hollenstein, D.M., Licheva, M., Konradi, N., Schweida, D., Mancilla, H., Mari, M. et al. (2021) Spatial control of avidity regulates initiation and progression of selective autophagy. *Nat. Commun.* **12**, 7194 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27420-3

24 Ktistakis, N.T., Andrews, S. and Long, J. (2011) What is the advantage of a transient precursor in autophagosome biogenesis? *Autophagy* **7**, 118–122 https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.7.1.13697

25 Tsuboyama, K., Koyama-Honda, I., Sakamaki, Y., Koike, M., Morishita, H. and Mizushima, N. (2016) The ATG conjugation systems are important for degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane. *Science* **354**, 1036–1041 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6136

26 Jacquemyn, J., Cascalho, A. and Goodchild, R.E. (2017) The ins and outs of endoplasmic reticulum-controlled lipid biosynthesis. *EMBO Rep.* **18**, 1905–1921 https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643426

27 Puri, C., Renna, M., Bento, C.F., Moreau, K. and Rubinsztein, D.C. (2013) Diverse autophagosome membrane sources coalesce in recycling endosomes. *Cell* **154**, 1285–1299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.044

28 Longatti, A., Lamb, C.A., Razi, M., Yoshimura, S., Barr, F.A. and Tooze, S.A. (2012) TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11- and ULK1-positive recycling endosomes. *J. Cell Biol.* **197**, 659–675 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201111079

29 Moreau, K., Ravikumar, B., Renna, M., Puri, C. and Rubinsztein, D.C. (2011) Autophagosome precursor maturation requires homotypic fusion. *Cell* **146**, 303–317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.023

30 Ravikumar, B., Moreau, K., Jahreiss, L., Puri, C. and Rubinsztein, D.C. (2010) Plasma membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **12**, 747–757 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2078

31 Hailey, D.W., Rambold, A.S., Satpute-Krishnan, P., Mitra, K., Sougrat, R., Kim, P.K. et al. (2010) Mitochondria supply membranes for autophagosome biogenesis during starvation. *Cell* **141**, 656–667 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.009

32 Ge, L., Melville, D., Zhang, M. and Schekman, R. (2013) The ER-Golgi intermediate compartment is a key membrane source for the LC3 lipidation step of autophagosome biogenesis. *eLife* **2**, e00947 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00947

33 Ge, L., Zhang, M. and Schekman, R. (2014) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and COPII generate LC3 lipidation vesicles from the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment. *eLife* **3**, e04135 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04135

34 Graef, M., Friedman, J.R., Graham, C., Babu, M. and Nunnari, J. (2013) ER exit sites are physical and functional core autophagosome biogenesis components. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **24**, 2918–2931 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e13-07-0381

35 Kumar, S., Javed, R., Mudd, M., Pallikkuth, S., Lidke, K.A., Jain, A. et al. (2021) Mammalian hybrid pre-autophagosomal structure HyPAS generates autophagosomes. *Cell* **184**, 5950–5969. e22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.017

36 Tang, Z., Takahashi, Y. and Wang, H.-G. (2019) ATG2 regulation of phagophore expansion at mitochondria-associated ER membranes. *Autophagy* **15**, 2165–2166 https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2019.1666594

37 Osawa, T., Kotani, T., Kawaoka, T., Hirata, E., Suzuki, K., Nakatogawa, H. et al. (2019) Atg2 mediates direct lipid transfer between membranes for autophagosome formation. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* **26**, 281–288 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-019-0203-4

38 Valverde, D.P. Yu, S., Boggavarapu, V., Kumar, N., Lees, J.A., Walz, T. et al. (2019) ATG2 transports lipids to promote autophagosome biogenesis. *J. Cell Biol.* **218**, 1787–1798 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201811139

39 van Vliet, A.R., Chiduza, G.N., Maslen, S.L., Pye, V.E., Joshi, D., Tito, S.D. et al. (2022) ATG9A and ATG2A form a heteromeric complex essential for autophagosome formation. *Mol. Cell* **82**, 4324–4339. e8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.10.017

40 Ghanbarpour, A., Valverde, D.P., Melia, T.J. and Reinisch, K.M. (2021) A model for a partnership of lipid transfer proteins and scramblases in membrane expansion and organelle biogenesis. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **118**, e2101562118 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101562118
41 Matoba, K., Kotani, T., Tsutsumi, A., Tsuji, T., Mori, T., Noshiro, D. et al. (2020) Atg9 is a lipid scramblase that mediates autophagosomal membrane expansion. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* **27**, 1185–1193 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-00518-w

42 Chowdhury, S., Otomo, C., Leitner, A., Ohashi, K., Aebersold, R., Lander, G.C. et al. (2018) Insights into autophagosome biogenesis from structural and biochemical analyses of the ATG2A-WIPI4 complex. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **58**, 201811874 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811874115

43 Kotani, T., Kirisako, H., Koizumi, M., Ohsumi, Y. and Nakatogawa, H. (2018) The Atg2-Atg18 complex tethers pre-autophagosomal membranes to the endoplasmic reticulum for autophagosome formation. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **115**, 10363–10368 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806727115

44 von Bülow, S. and Hummer, G. (2020) Kinetics of Atg2-mediated lipid transfer from the ER can account for phagophore expansion. *bioRxiv* https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.12.090977

45 Maeda, S., Otomo, C. and Otomo, T. (2019) The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes. *eLife* **8**, e45777 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45777

46 Guidotti, G. (1972) Membrane proteins. *Annu. Rev. Biochem.* **41**, 731–752 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.003503

47 Schütter, M., Giavalisco, P., Brodesser, S. and Graef, M. (2020) Local fatty acid channeling into phospholipid synthesis drives phagophore expansion during autophagy. *Cell* **180**, 135–149.e14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.005

48 Nähse, V., Raiborg, C., Tan, K.W., Mørk, S., Torgersen, M.L., Wenzel, E.M. et al. (2023) ATPase activity of DFCP1 controls selective autophagy. *Nat. Commun.* **14**, 4051 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39641-9

49 Lukmantara, I., Chen, F., Mak, H.Y., Zadoorian, A., Du, X., Xiao, F.N. et al. (2022) PI(3)P and DFCP1 regulate the biogenesis of lipid droplets. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **33**, ar131 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E22-07-0279

50 Velikkakath, A.K.G., Nishimura, T., Oita, E., Ishihara, N. and Mizushima, N. (2012) Mammalian Atg2 proteins are essential for autophagosome formation and important for regulation of size and distribution of lipid droplets. *Mol. Biol. Cell* **23**, 896–909 https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e11-09-0785

51 Hayashi-Nishino, M., Fujita, N., Noda, T., Yamaguchi, A., Yoshimori, T. and Yamamoto, A. (2009) A subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum forms a cradle for autophagosome formation. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **11**, 1433–1437 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1991

52 Carter, S.D., Mamede, J.I., Hope, T.J. and Jensen, G.J. (2020) Correlated cryogenic fluorescence microscopy and electron cryo-tomography shows that exogenous TRIM5α can form hexagonal lattices or autophagy aggregates in vivo. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **117**, 29702–29711 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920323117

53 Bieber, A., Capitanio, C., Erdmann, P.S., Fiedler, F., Beck, F., Lee, C.-W. et al. (2022) In situ structural analysis reveals membrane shape transitions during autophagosome formation. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **119**, e2209823119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209823119

54 Tan, D., Cai, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Menon, S., Chou, H.-T. et al. (2013) The EM structure of the TRAPPIII complex leads to the identification of a requirement for COPII vesicles on the macroautophagy pathway. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **110**, 19432–19437 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316356110

55 Sanchez-Wandelmer, J., Kistakis, N.T. and Reggiori, F. (2015) ERES: sites for autophagosome biogenesis and maturation? *J. Cell Sci.* **128**, 185–192 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.158758

56 Duarte, P.V. and Reggiori, F. (2023) The organization and function of the phagophore-ER membrane contact sites. *Contact* **6**, 25152564231183896 https://doi.org/10.1177/25152564231183898

57 Capitanio, C., Bieber, A. and Wilfling, F. (2023) How membrane contact sites shape the phagophore. *Contact* **6**, 25152564231162496 https://doi.org/10.1177/25152564231162495

58 Shima, T., Kirisako, H. and Nakatogawa, H. (2019) COPII vesicles contribute to autophagosomal membranes. *J. Cell Biol.* **218**, 1503–1510 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201809032

59 Li, S., Yan, R., Xu, J., Zhao, S., Ma, X., Sun, Q. et al. (2022) A new type of ERGIC-ERES membrane contact mediated by TMED9 and SEC12 is required for autophagosome biogenesis. *Cell Res.* **32**, 119–138 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-021-00563-0

60 Stadel, D., Millarte, V., Tillmann, K.D., Huber, J., Tamin-Yecheskel, B.-C., Akutsu, M. et al. (2015) TECPR2 cooperates with LC3C to regulate COPII-dependent ER export. *Mol. Cell* **60**, 89–104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.010

61 Ge, L., Zhang, M., Kenny, S.J., Liu, D., Maeda, M., Saito, K. et al. (2017) Remodeling of ER-exit sites initiates a membrane supply pathway for autophagosome biogenesis. *EMBO Rep.* **18**, 1586–1603 https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744559

62 Jeong, Y.-T., Simoneschi, D., Keegan, S., Melville, D., Adler, N.S., Saraf, A. et al. (2018) The ULK1-FBXW5-SEC23B nexus controls autophagy. *eLife* **7**, e42253 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42253

63 Vance, J.E. (2014) MAM (mitochondria-associated membranes) in mammalian cells: lipids and beyond. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids* **1841**, 595–609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.014

64 Cohen, S., Valm, A.M. and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2018) Interacting organelles. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **53**, 84–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2018.06.003

65 Csordás, G., Weaver, D. and Hajnóczky, G. (2018) Endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondrial contactology: structure and signaling functions. *Trends Cell Biol.* **28**, 523–540 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.009

66 Hu, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, L., Lin, X., Li, X., Zhuang, H. et al. (2021) The AMPK-MFN2 axis regulates MAM dynamics and autophagy induced by energy stresses. *Autophagy* **17**, 1142–1156 https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1749490

67 Bosc, C., Broin, N., Fanjul, M., Saland, E., Farge, T., Courdy, C. et al. (2020) Autophagy regulates fatty acid availability for oxidative phosphorylation through mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum contact sites. *Nat. Commun.* **11**, 4056 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17882-2

68 Strappazzon, F., Vietri-Rudan, M., Campello, S., Nazio, F., Florenzano, F., Finia, G.M. et al. (2011) Mitochondrial BCL-2 inhibits AMBRA1-induced autophagy. *EMBO J.* **30**, 1195–1208 https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.49

69 Ahumada-Castro, U., Silva-Pavez, E., Lovy, A., Pardo, E., Molgó, J. and Cárdenas, C. (2019) MTOR-independent autophagy induced by interrupted endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ communication: a dead end in cancer cells. *Autophagy* **15**, 358–361 https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1537769

70 Xu, L., Qiu, Y., Wang, X., Shang, W., Bai, J., Shi, K. et al. (2022) ER-mitochondrial contact protein Miga regulates autophagy through Atg14 and Uvrag. *Cell Rep.* **41**, 111583 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111583

71 Tang, Z., Takahashi, Y., He, H., Hattori, T., Chen, C., Liang, X. et al. (2019) TOM40 targets Atg2 to mitochondria-associated ER membranes for phagophore expansion. *Cell Rep.* **28**, 1744–1757.e5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.036
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

72 Voeltz, G.K., Sawyer, E.M., Hajnóczky, G. and Prinz, W.A. (2024) Making the connection: how membrane contact sites have changed our view of organelle biology. *Cell* **187**, 257–270 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.040

73 Morel, E. (2020) Endoplasmic reticulum membrane and contact site dynamics in autophagy regulation and stress response. *Front. Cell Dev. Biol.* **8**, 343
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00343

74 Giordano, F., Saheki, Y., Idevall-Hagren, O., Colombo, S.F., Pirruccello, M., Milosevic, I. et al. (2013) PI(4,5)P2-dependent and Ca2+-regulated ER-PM interactions mediated by the extended synaptotagmins. *Cell* **153**, 1494–1509 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.026

75 Molejon, M.I., Ropolo, A., Duette, G., Santillan, M., Boggio, V. and Vaccaro, M.I. (2013) The VMP1-Beclin 1 interaction regulates autophagy induction. *FASEB J.* **27**, 832.4 https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.832.4

76 Nascimbeni, A.C., Giordano, F., Dupont, N., Grasso, D., Vaccaro, M.I., Codogno, P. et al. (2017) ER–plasma membrane contact sites contribute to autophagosome biogenesis by regulation of local PI3P synthesis. *EMBO J.* **36**, 2018–2033 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201797006

77 Puri, C., Renna, M., Bento, C.F., Moreau, K. and Rubinsstein, D.C. (2014) ATG16L1 meets ATG9 in recycling endosomes: additional roles for the plasma membrane and endocytosis in autophagosome biogenesis. *Autophagy* **10**, 182–184 https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.27174

78 Tito, S.D., Hervás, J.H., van Vliet, A.R. and Tooze, S.A. (2020) The Golgi as an assembly line to the autophagosome. *Trends Biochem. Sci.* **45**, 484–496 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2020.03.010

79 Karanasios, E., Walker, S.A., Okkenhaug, H., Manifava, M., Hummel, E., Zimmermann, H. et al. (2016) Autophagy initiation by ULK complex assembly on ER tubulovesicular regions marked by ATG9 vesicles. *Nat. Commun.* **7**, 12420 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12420

80 Broadbent, D.G., Barnaba, C., Perez, G.I. and Schmidt, J.C. (2023) Quantitative analysis of autophagy reveals the role of ATG9 and ATG2 in autophagosome formation. *J. Cell Biol.* **222**, e202210078 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202210078

81 Claude-Taupin, A., Jia, J., Bhujabal, Z., Garfa-Traoré, M., Kumar, S., da Silva, G.P.D. et al. (2021) ATG9A protects the plasma membrane from programmed and incidental permeabilization. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **23**, 846–858 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00706-w

82 Campisi, D., Desrues, L., Dembélé, K.-P., Mutel, A., Parment, R., Gandolfo, P. et al. (2022) The core autophagy protein ATG9A controls dynamics of cell protrusions and directed migration. *J. Cell Biol.* **221**, e202106014 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202106014

83 Kimura, S., Noda, T. and Yoshimori, T. (2007) Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. *Autophagy* **3**, 452–460 https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.4451

84 Mizushima, N. (2020) The ATG conjugation systems in autophagy. *Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.* **63**, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.001

85 Weidberg, H., Shvets, E., Shpilka, T., Shimron, F., Shinder, V. and Elazar, Z. (2010) LC3 and GATE-16/GABARAP subfamilies are both essential yet act differently in autophagosome biogenesis. *EMBO J.* **29**, 1792–1802 https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.74

86 Zhang, W., Nishimura, T., Gahlot, D., Saito, C., Davis, C., Jefferies, H.B. et al. (2023) Autophagosome membrane expansion is mediated by the N-terminus and cis-membrane association of human ATG8s. *eLife* **12**, e89185 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89185

87 Nguyen, T.N., Padman, B.S., Usher, J., Oorschot, V., Ramm, G. and Lazarou, M. (2016) Atg8 family LC3/GABARAP proteins are crucial for autophagosome–lysosome fusion but not autophagosome formation during PINK1/Parkin mitophagy and starvation. *J. Cell Biol.* **215**, 857–874
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607039

88 Mohan, J., Moparthi, S.B., Girard-Blanc, C., Campisi, D., Blanchard, S., Nugues, C. et al. (2024) ATG16L1 induces the formation of phagophore-like membrane cups. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* **31**, 1448–1459 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-024-01300-y

89 Kaufmann, A., Beier, V., Franquelim, H.G. and Wollert, T. (2014) Molecular mechanism of autophagic membrane-scaffold assembly and disassembly. *Cell* **156**, 469–481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.022

90 Alam, J.M., Maruyama, T., Noshiro, D., Kakuta, C., Kotani, T., Nakatogawa, H. et al. (2023) Complete set of the Atg8–E1–E2–E3 conjugation machinery forms an interaction web that mediates membrane shaping. *Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.* **31**, 170–178 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01132-2

91 Mizushima, N., Kuma, A., Kobayashi, Y., Yamamoto, A., Matsubae, M., Takao, T. et al. (2003) Mouse Apg16L, a novel WD-repeat protein, targets to the autophagic isolation membrane with the Apg12-Apg5 conjugate. *J. Cell Sci.* **116**, 1679–1688 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00381

92 Mizushima, N., Yamamoto, A., Hatano, M., Kobayashi, Y., Kabeya, Y., Suzuki, K. et al. (2001) Dissection of autophagosome formation using Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells. *J. Cell Biol.* **152**, 657–668 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.152.4.657

93 Dudley, L.J., Cabodevilla, A.G., Makar, A.N., Sztacho, M., Michelberger, T., Marsh, J.A. et al. (2019) Intrinsic lipid binding activity of ATG16L1 supports efficient membrane anchoring and autophagy. *EMBO J.* **38**, e100554 https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100554

94 Lystad, A.H., Carlsson, S.R., de la Ballina, L.R., Kauffman, K.J., Nag, S., Yoshimori, T. et al. (2019) Distinct functions of ATG16L1 isoforms in membrane binding and LC3B lipidation in autophagy-related processes. *Nat. Cell Biol.* **21**, 372–383 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0274-9

95 Dooley, H.C., Razi, M., Polson, H.E.J., Girardin, S.E., Wilson, M.I. and Tooze, S.A. (2014) WIPI2 links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting Atg12–5-16L1. *Mol. Cell* **55**, 238–252 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.021