# Multiscale and Innovative Kinetic Approaches in Heterogeneous Catalysis

Y. Schuurman, Pascal Granger

► To cite this version:

Y. Schuurman, Pascal Granger. Multiscale and Innovative Kinetic Approaches in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Catalysts, 2019, 9 (6), 10.3390/catal9060501. hal-02349046

HAL Id: hal-02349046

https://hal.science/hal-02349046

Submitted on 16 Nov 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
# Multiscale and Innovative Kinetic Approaches in Heterogeneous Catalysis

Yves Schuurman ¹D and Pascal Granger <fnref n="2" />,*

Received: 19 April 2019; Accepted: 20 May 2019; Published: 31 May 2019

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

Kinetics and reactor modeling for heterogeneous catalytic reactions are prominent tools for investigating, and understanding, the catalyst functionalities at nanoscale, and related rates of complex reaction networks. Prominent developments were achieved in the past three decades from steady-state to unsteady state kinetic approaches facing important issues related to the transformation of more complex feedstocks using a wide variety of reactor designs, including continuous flow reactors, fluidized reactors, recirculating solid reactors, pulse reactors, Temporal Analysis of Product (TAP) reactors with sometimes a strong gap in the operating conditions from ultra-high-vacuum to high pressure conditions. In conjunction, new methodologies have emerged giving rise to more sophisticated mathematical models, including the intrinsic reaction kinetics and the dynamics of the reactors and spanning a large range of length and time scales, from the nanoscale of the active site to the reactor scale. Recently, the development of steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis coupled with in situ and in operando techniques is aimed at gaining more insight into reactive intermediates.

The objective of this special issue is to provide diverse contributions that can illustrate recent advances and new methodologies for elucidating the kinetics of heterogeneous reactions and the necessary multiscale approaches for optimizing the reactor design.

Among the different contributions provided in this special issue, two articles review and summarize the use of elegant methodologies. In the frame of microkinetic approaches for catalytic reactions, the isolation of the real intermediates among various adsorbates and the calculation of more accurate kinetic and thermodynamic parameters to refine kinetic models are still challenging. In this context, the development of new analytical tools, such as adsorption equilibrium infrared spectroscopy, provides an alternative to classical surface science studies—offering the opportunity to get more accurate heat of adsorptions of co-adsorbed species, and taking the coverage dependency into account in more realistic operating conditions [1]. In general, the extrapolation of kinetic models in very different operating conditions than those applied for its development must be taken with caution leading to unrealistic deviations and over interpretations. In practice, microkinetics cannot be sufficient to get a proper description of complexity, as mentioned by Standl and Hinrichsen [2], who proposed both lumped and microkinetic approaches in catalytic olefin cracking and methanol-to-olefin over zeolites. Useful general and specific recommendations for future modeling of complex networks are given by these authors.

Full papers also proved the usefulness of kinetic approaches especially in the context of an energy transition. By way of illustration, Song [3] paid attention to dehydration of 2,3-butanediol to 1,3-butadiene and methyl ethyl ketone produced from various biomasses instead of fossil resources. It was found that 1D reactor modelling taking into account interfacial and intra particles gradients

<footnote n="1">¹ Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l'Environnement, Ircelyon UMR 5256, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 2 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69626 Villeurbanne CEDEX, France; yves.schuurman@ircelyon.univ-lyon1.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, ENSCL, Univ. Artois, UMR 8181—UCCS—Unité de Catalyse et Chimie du Solide, F-59000 Lille, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: pascal.granger@univ-lille.fr; Tel.: +33-320-434-938</footnote>
can provide important information for further development of commercial processes. Nowadays, computer-aided design can be essential for the prediction of reactor performances. At the macroscopic scale, the use of empirical rate equations is not rigorous and precise enough to fit boundary conditions whereas microkinetic approaches should in principle provide more robust models, but sophistication is usually synonymous with time-consuming. Gossler et al. [4] developed a relevant methodology for reactor simulation for gaining time. It is worthwhile to note that these complex approaches coexist with more conventional approaches performed in the kinetic regime. Such studies can be useful to get more relevant structure-reactivity relationship taking uniformity in the gas phase and the catalyst bed composition as shown by Urmès et al. [5], who concluded that the selective hydrogenation of acetylene on supported palladium-based catalyst involves a single active site. Temporal analysis of products is able to investigate the catalyst behavior in wide conversion range, especially at high conversion generally encountered in more realistic conditions. Because transport regimes can be modeled, those transient experiments can provide the time response of a surface exposed to ammonia, and distinguish between the ability of cobalt and iron to store a mixture of hydrogenated ad-species or predominantly N or NH [6]. Finally, two contributions report lab-scale experiments on structured catalysts, e.g., dense filamentous graphite [7,8], and illustrating the best practice at lab-scale through the comparison of catalysts in powder and tableted form to examine the impact of internal diffusion limitation on the determination of kinetic parameters.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest

**References**

1. Bianchi, D. A Contribution to the Experimental Microkinetic Approach of Gas/Solid Heterogeneous Catalysis: Measurement of the Individual Heats of Adsorption of Coadsorbed Species by Using the AEIR Method. *Catalysts* **2018**, *8*, 265. [CrossRef]

2. Standl, S.; Hinrichsen, O. Kinetic Modeling of Catalytic Olefin Cracking and Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) over Zeolites: A Review. *Catalysts* **2018**, *8*, 626. [CrossRef]

3. Song, D. Modeling of a Pilot-Scale Fixed-Bed Reactor for Dehydration of 2,3-Butanediol to 1,3-Butadiene and Methyl Ethyl Ketone. *Catalysts* **2018**, *8*, 72. [CrossRef]

4. Gossler, H.; Maier, L.; Angeli, S.; Tischer, S.; Deutschmann, O. CaRMeN: An Improved Computer-Aided Method for Developing Catalytic Reaction Mechanisms. *Catalysts* **2019**, *9*, 227. [CrossRef]

5. Urmès, C.; Schweitzer, J.-M.; Cabiac, A.; Schuurman, Y. Kinetic Study of the Selective Hydrogenation of Acetylene over Supported Palladium under Tail-End Conditions. *Catalysts* **2019**, *9*, 180. [CrossRef]

6. Wang, Y.; Kunz, M.R.; Siebers, S.; Rollins, H.; Gleaves, J.; Yablonsky, G.; Fushimi, R. Transient Kinetic Experiments within the High Conversion Domain: The Case of Ammonia Decomposition. *Catalysts* **2019**, *9*, 104. [CrossRef]

7. Xu, Z.; Duong-Viet, C.; Ba, H.; Li, B.; Truong-Huu, T.; Nguyen-Dinh, L.; Pham-Huu, C. Gaseous Nitric Acid Activated Graphite Felts as Hierarchical Metal-Free Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of H₂S. *Catalysts* **2018**, *8*, 145. [CrossRef]

8. Obalová, L.; Klegova, A.; Matějová, L.; Pacultová, K.; Fridrichová, D. Must the Best Laboratory Prepared Catalyst Also Be the Best in an Operational Application? *Catalysts* **2019**, *9*, 160.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).