# Case Report: The role of bone scans in detecting Ribbing disease

Abel Dambrain, Clément Bouron, Franck Lacoeuille

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Abel Dambrain, Clément Bouron, Franck Lacoeuille. Case Report: The role of bone scans in detecting Ribbing disease. Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine, 2025, 5, pp.1527159. 10.3389/fnume.2025.1527159. hal-05488900

HAL Id: hal-05488900

https://hal.science/hal-05488900v1

Submitted on 2 Feb 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED BY
Edel Noriega-Álvarez,
University Hospital of Guadalajara, Spain

REVIEWED BY
Virginia Peiró,
Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Spain
Francisco José Pena Pardo,
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real,
Spain

*CORRESPONDENCE

Abel Dambrain
abeldambrain@gmail.com

RECEIVED 12 November 2024

ACCEPTED 11 February 2025

PUBLISHED 12 March 2025

CITATION

Dambrain A, Bouron C and Lacoeuille F (2025)
Case Report: The role of bone scans in
detecting Ribbing disease.
Front. Nucl. Med. 5:1527159.
doi: 10.3389/fnume.2025.1527159

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Dambrain, Bouron and Lacoeuille. This
is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the
copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with
these terms.

# Case Report: The role of bone scans in detecting Ribbing disease

Abel Dambrain¹*, Clément Bouron¹ and Franck Lacoeuille¹,²

¹Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center, Angers, France, ²CRCI2NA-Inserm UMR1307/CNRS UMR 6075, University of Angers, Angers, France

In this case, we report the usefulness of bone scintigraphy in evaluating osteoarticular pain when the diagnosis is unclear after standard morphological imaging. A 24-year-old male patient exhibited mild left tibial pain that had been intensifying over a period of 2 years. The initial radiological evaluation suggested a diagnosis of pediatric tibial bone marrow osteosclerosis associated with periostitis, based on standard radiographs and MRI. However, a complementary bone scan was required for confirmation and showed moderate hyperemia and severe hyperfixation of the tibial lesion along with similar lesions on the left femur, both humeri, and the right ulna. These new findings led to a diagnosis of Ribbing disease, a rare sclerosing bone dysplasia.

KEYWORDS

Ribbing disease, osteocondensation, bone scan, osteoarticular, dysplasia, scintigraphy

Introduction

Ribbing disease may be responsible for chronic osteoarticular pain that can lead to
significant disability. There are no specific tests to confirm the diagnosis, making
imaging essential for excluding other differential diagnoses (1, 2).

Typically, the lesions are asymmetrical, affecting only the long bones (most frequently the tibia, followed by the femur and humerus), sparing the epiphyses. CT scans typically show a medullary and periosteal thickening, and MRI shows medullary edema (2, 3). As in our case, these characteristics could be compatible with several other pathologies, such as periostitis and sclerosing bone dysplasia. A bone scan provides osteoblastic information of the whole body, which may help to refine the diagnosis. In the case of Ribbing disease, hyperemia is associated with irregular hyperfixation (1, 4) of lesions due to the increase in osteoblastic activity. This case highlights the role of bone scintigraphy as part of the diagnostic approach, facilitating the identification of Ribbing disease and excluding other conditions, such as periostitis or osteosclerosis.

Case

A 24-year-old male patient presented with diurnal pain for 2 years, often associated with exercise, but not disabling. He had no personal medical history but had an uncle with chronic diffuse pain that was not investigated. The clinical examination only revealed an anterior tibial swelling and blood tests were normal.

X-ray imaging (Figure 1A) revealed endosteal medio-diaphyseal osteocondensation of the left tibia extending over 12 cm, sparing the metaphysis and epiphyses. MRI (Figure 1B) showed a circumferential sclerotic lesion hypointense on T1 and T2 weighted
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 1
X-ray (A) and MRI (B) of the left tibia showing intramedullary osteosclerosis associated with peripheral edema.</figcaption></figure>

images with medullary canal narrowing, associated with bone marrow and periosteal edema. There were no abnormalities of the soft tissue nor any signs of malignant periosteal reaction. The radiologists concluded that there was intramedullary osteosclerosis of the tibia associated with medial tibial stress syndrome (periostitis stage).

A [⁹⁹mTc]Tc-HDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT scan (Figure 2) was requested to specify the diagnosis. It showed moderate hyperemia associated with severe and heterogeneous hyperfixation of the left tibial lesion (Figure 2A). In addition, the whole-body scan (Figure 2B) revealed moderate hyperfixation in other parts of the skeleton, including the lower third of the left femur, the distal extremities of both humeri, and the upper part of the right ulna. CT images showed a similar appearance to the intramedullary condensing tibial lesion (Figure 2C) at the other sites (Figures 2D,E) with an important osteoblastic reaction.

The patient did not undergo a biopsy, but the biological and radiological data supported the diagnosis of Ribbing disease as a diagnosis of exclusion. A radiological follow-up performed 1 year later showed stable lesions, and the patient experienced no worsening of symptoms during this period despite the absence of specific treatment, consistent with Ribbing disease.

Discussion

Ribbing disease is a sclerosing diaphyseal dysplasia, first recognized by Ribbing in 1949 (5), primarily affecting young

patients. Its origin is related to an autosomal recessive mutation of the *TGF-β1* gene, which is responsible for increased differentiation and proliferation due to the activation of growth factors such as TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), INF-γ (interferon-γ) and TGF-b (transforming growth factor bêta). Thus, a family history is present in up to 50% of cases (1). It may be asymptomatic, or the only clinical abnormality may be localized pain caused by local swelling. Blood tests should be normal and exclude bone remodeling, vitamin deficiency, or infection. Histology is non-specific but contributes to excluding osteomyelitis or neoplasia. Biopsy should reveal an increase in osteoblastic activity associated with fibrosis and Haversian system disorders (1). Bone scintigraphy contributes to the diagnosis by identifying fixation patterns that exclude some infectious, inflammatory, or tumor processes. It also allows for an efficient topographic analysis of lesions across the whole body, which helps to guide biopsy procedures for histological analysis. In our case, the initial diagnosis was periostitis associated with medullary osteosclerosis due to the shared characteristics of these three diseases and their prevalence in the general population. Ribbing disease can be distinguished from periostitis by the presence of intense non-linear uptake, along with the absence of fracture on all imaging modalities (6). The clinical context also differs, as periostitis typically occurs following a recent increase in physical activity. In comparison with osteosclerosis, Ribbing disease usually shows medullary edema adjacent to areas of osteosclerosis on MRI and intense hyperemia on bone scans (7, 8). These characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Another differential diagnosis is Camurati-Engelmann disease, which is a
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>TABLE 1 Main differences between Ribbing disease, periostitis, and intramedullary osteosclerosis according to different imaging modalities (CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy) (1-3, 6-8).</figcaption></figure>

<table><thead><tr><th>Imaging modality</th><th>Ribbing</th><th>Periostitis</th><th>Medullar osteosclerosis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>X-ray and CT scan</td><td>Intramedullary density<br>Periosteal thickening<br>Endosteal thickening</td><td>Normal<br>Periosteal thickening<br>Fracture</td><td>Soft tissue swelling<br>Periosteal thickening<br>Endosteal thickening</td></tr><tr><td>MRI</td><td>Decreased signal on T1 and T2 weighted images<br>Cortical thickening<br>Peripheral endosteal bone marrow edema<br>Adjacent soft-tissue edema</td><td>Endosteal bone marrow edema<br>Cortical edema (increased signal on T2)<br>Areas of intracortical signal changes<br>Fracture</td><td>T1: decreased signal intensity<br>T2: variable<br>Gadolinium: low signal intensity at the bone site</td></tr><tr><td>Bone scan</td><td>Intense irregular uptake<br>Moderate to intense hyperemia</td><td>Moderate uptake, heterogeneous and linear<br>Variable periosteal hyperemia<br>Fracture: focal hyperemia</td><td>Moderate uptake<br>Slightly increased vascularity</td></tr></tbody></table>

progressive sclerosing diaphyseal dysplasia with autosomal dominant inheritance, described by Cockayne in 1920 (9) and caused by a TGF-β1 mutation. It is characterized by the same lesion as Ribbing disease but is symmetrical and associated with a physical disability such as a Marfanoid profile, myopathic symptoms, and nerve damage (10).

There are no recommendations for the therapeutic management of Ribbing disease. Available treatments include analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and bisphosphonates, but their efficacy is highly debated. As a last resort, intramedullary reaming may be

considered to reduce intraosseous pressure and edema caused by osteosclerosis, with notable effectiveness (2).

## Conclusion

Our case highlights the importance of dual-phase bone scintigraphy in patients with the common clinical features of chronic osteoarticular pain and atypical lesions on CT and MRI, in whom Ribbing disease should be considered despite its rarity.
## Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

## Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

## Author contributions

AD: Writing – original draft. CB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. FL: Validation, Writing – review & editing.

## Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

## References

1. Pijls BG, Steentjes K, Schoones JW, Dijkstra SP. Ribbing disease: a systematic review. *Acta Radiol.* (2018) 59(4):448–53. doi: 10.1177/0284185117719575

2. Panigrahi S, Patro BP, Mohapatra A, Patra SK. Ribbing disease of tibia: a rare entity. *BMJ Case Rep.* (2021) 14(10):e244868. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-244868

3. Lokesh M, Suriyakumar S. A rare case of Ribbing disease- diagnosis and management. *J Orthop Case Rep.* (2020) 10(4):69–73. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i04.1808

4. Mukkada PJ, Franklin T, Rajeswaran R, Joseph S. Ribbing disease. *Indian J Radiol Imaging*. (2010) 20(01):47–9. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.59754

5. Ribbing S. Hereditary, multiple, diaphyseal sclerosis. *Acta Radiol.* (1949) 31(5-6):522–36. doi: 10.3109/00016924909138232

## Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

6. Kijowski R, Choi J, Shinki K, Del Rio AM, De Smet A. Validation of MRI classification system for tibial stress injuries. *AJR Am J Roentgenol.* (2012) 198(4):878–84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6826

7. Ihde LL, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ, Masih S, Patel DB, Vachon LA, et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: review and differentiation from other causes of osteosclerosis. *RadioGraphics.* (2011) 31(7):1865–82. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115093

8. Galdino VDAC, Martins MM, Marcos VN, Gonçalves GF, Dias RG, Mileti DR. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: a pictorial essay. *Radiol Bras.* (2024) 57:e20240058. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0058-en

9. Cockayne EA. Case for diagnosis. *Proc R Soc Med.* (1920) 13:132–6. PMID: 19981348; PMCID: PMC2152594.

10. Van Hul W, Boudin E, Vanhoenacker FM, Mortier G. Camurati–Engelmann disease. *Calcif Tissue Int.* (2019) 104:554–60. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00532-1