# Adult-born neurons add flexibility to hippocampal memories

Orsolya Fölsz, Stéphanie Trouche, Vincent Croset

► To cite this version:

Orsolya Fölsz, Stéphanie Trouche, Vincent Croset. Adult-born neurons add flexibility to hippocampal memories. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2023, 17, pp.1128623. 10.3389/fnins.2023.1128623. hal-03991731

HAL Id: hal-03991731

https://hal.science/hal-03991731

Submitted on 16 Feb 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED BY

Ashok K. Shetty,
Texas A&M University College of Medicine,
United States

REVIEWED BY

Shawn Fletcher Sorrells,
University of Pittsburgh, United States

*CORRESPONDENCE

Vincent Croset

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

vincent.croset@durham.ac.uk

SPECIALTY SECTION

This article was submitted to
Neurodevelopment,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience

RECEIVED 20 December 2022

ACCEPTED 30 January 2023

PUBLISHED 15 February 2023

CITATION

Fölsz O, Trouche S and Croset V (2023) Adult-born neurons add flexibility to hippocampal memories. *Front. Neurosci.* 17:1128623. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1128623

COPYRIGHT

© 2023 Fölsz, Trouche and Croset. This is an
open-access article distributed under the terms
of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
The use, distribution or reproduction in
other forums is permitted, provided the original
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are
credited and that the original publication in this
journal is cited, in accordance with accepted
academic practice. No use, distribution or
reproduction is permitted which does not
comply with these terms.

Adult-born neurons add flexibility
to hippocampal memories

Orsolya Fölsz¹,², Stéphanie Trouche³ and Vincent Croset¹*

¹Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom, ²MSc in Neuroscience Programme, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, ³Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France

Although most neurons are generated embryonically, neurogenesis is maintained at low rates in specific brain areas throughout adulthood, including the dentate gyrus of the mammalian hippocampus. Episodic-like memories encoded in the hippocampus require the dentate gyrus to decorrelate similar experiences by generating distinct neuronal representations from overlapping inputs (pattern separation). Adult-born neurons integrating into the dentate gyrus circuit compete with resident mature cells for neuronal inputs and outputs, and recruit inhibitory circuits to limit hippocampal activity. They display transient hyperexcitability and hyperplasticity during maturation, making them more likely to be recruited by any given experience. Behavioral evidence suggests that adult-born neurons support pattern separation in the rodent dentate gyrus during encoding, and they have been proposed to provide a temporal stamp to memories encoded in close succession. The constant addition of neurons gradually degrades old connections, promoting generalization and ultimately forgetting of remote memories in the hippocampus. This makes space for new memories, preventing saturation and interference. Overall, a small population of adult-born neurons appears to make a unique contribution to hippocampal information encoding and removal. Although several inconsistencies regarding the functional relevance of neurogenesis remain, in this review we argue that immature neurons confer a unique form of transience on the dentate gyrus that complements synaptic plasticity to help animals flexibly adapt to changing environments.

KEYWORDS

neurogenesis, memory, hippocampus, forgetting, pattern separation, flexibility

Introduction

Brain plasticity enables animals to encode novel information and adapt to changing environments. A leading hypothesis suggests that memory representations are stored within connected neuronal ensembles called engrams in each brain region and throughout the brain (Semon, 1921). Neuronal ensembles activated together by a learning experience undergo persistent functional modifications upon learning and are reactivated together during memory recall. Learning triggers lasting changes in synaptic strength between co-activated neurons (Hebb, 2005), often underlain by long-term potentiation (LTP) of relevant synapses (Bliss and Lomo, 1973).

In the mammalian brain, episodic-like memories are stored in the hippocampus (Figure 1A). The dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus integrates spatio-temporal and event-specific information from the medial and lateral entorhinal cortex (EC), respectively, and converts them into sparse neuronal representations (Engin et al., 2015). Pattern separation enables
highly analogous memories to be stored with little interference in distinct cell ensembles in the CA3 subfield (Leutgeb et al., 2007). The DG also attenuates the generalization of remote fear memories and may be involved in the remote memory retrieval (Bernier et al., 2017). CA3 performs the complementary process of pattern completion, enabling behavioral expression of a memory trace, even when the context or inputs of memory recall are different from encoding or incomplete (Leutgeb et al., 2007). Outputs from CA3 are compared with direct EC inputs in CA1 and sent back to the EC to be distributed across the neocortex for long-term storage. The EC also has direct connections with CA3, which are involved in discrimination of distinct stimuli (Fyhn et al., 2007).

In most mammals, hippocampal circuitry is constantly reformed by a unique form of structural and functional plasticity involving neurogenesis. Adult neurogenesis in rodents is present in at least two areas: the subventricular zone lining the lateral ventricles, and the subgranular zone of the DG (Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1993; Kempermann et al., 1997a). The former gives rise to cells that migrate to the olfactory bulb and differentiate into inhibitory olfactory neurons, while the latter generates excitatory glutamatergic granule cells (GCs). The vast majority of DG GCs are born perinatally, after which neurogenesis declines and is maintained at varying levels throughout adulthood (Ngwenya et al., 2015; Hochgerner et al., 2018). Of all DG GCs, ~0.2% are generated daily in rats and ~0.06% in mice (Kempermann et al., 1997a; Cameron and Mckay, 2001). Around half of adult-born GCs (abGCs) generated are eliminated through waves of programmed cell death during their maturation (Dayer et al., 2003; Ryu et al., 2016; Pilz et al., 2018). Surviving cells are stably maintained and ultimately become indistinguishable from developmental GCs (Dayer et al., 2003; Kempermann et al., 2003). Neurogenesis is balanced by the continuous removal of mostly perinatally-generated mature GCs (mGCs) (Ciric et al., 2019), resulting in a constant or slightly expanding DG cell number (Rapp and Gallagher, 1996; Kempermann et al., 1997b). In this review, we argue that integration of abGCs into the DG network confers plasticity to the classical cortico-hippocampal circuit.

## Functional integration of adult-born neurons

Proliferation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in the subgranular zone of the DG produces neuronal fate-committed cells that undergo stereotypic stages of maturation (Hochgerner et al., 2018; Pilz et al., 2018). Maturing abGCs extend dendrites and an axon toward CA3 (or CA2; Llorens-Martín et al., 2015) of the hippocampus (Zhao et al., 2006), shifting excitation-inhibition balance. The ensuing critical period of hyperexcitability (Mongiat et al., 2009; Danielson et al., 2016; Li L. et al., 2017) is characterized by lower LTP induction threshold and higher LTP amplitude compared to mature mGCs (Schmidt-Hieber et al., 2004; Ge et al., 2007; Li et al., 2013). Maturing abGCs continuously reform their connections with the local circuitry, in an activity-dependent manner (Toni et al., 2007; Jungenitz et al., 2018).

During early maturation, abGCs receive inhibitory inputs from local interneurons and form transient direct connections with mGCs (Hendricks et al., 2017; Gozel and Gerstner, 2021). Electrophysiological recordings show that abGCs receiving lateral EC inputs inhibit mGCs, while abGCs receiving medial EC inputs

excite mGCs (Luna et al., 2019). Later, abGCs switch from direct interactions to synaptic competition with mGCs for EC inputs and CA3 targets. Electron microscopy evidence shows that abGCs initially contact pre-existing axon terminals occupied by other neurons, but later outcompete mGC axons to become unique synaptic partners (Toni et al., 2007). Similar processes occur dendritically (Toni et al., 2008; McAvoy et al., 2016). Firing connections are stably maintained while inactive ones are pruned, therefore hyperexcitable abGCs tend to prevail, driving the elimination of existing mGC connections (Tashiro et al., 2007; Yasuda et al., 2011; Restivo et al., 2015; Murray et al., 2020). The selective survival of abGCs may also be regulated by synaptic activity, and in an information-specific manner (Tashiro et al., 2006). abGCs additionally form dynamic connections with hippocampal interneurons that inhibit neighboring mGCs (lateral inhibition), and exert inhibition even on CA3 and CA1 (feedforward inhibition) (Chawla et al., 2005; Guo et al., 2018; Berdugo-Vega et al., 2020). This results in the overall sparsification of population firing across the hippocampus (Lacefield et al., 2012; Temprana et al., 2015; McHugh et al., 2022).

Excitation or artificial LTP induction, as well as exposure to new experiences, such as spatial learning, voluntary exercise, or increased sensory stimulation (e.g., animal housing in groups, novel toys in home cages etc.) promote neurogenesis (Kempermann et al., 1997b; Gould et al., 1999; van Praag et al., 1999; Deisseroth et al., 2004; Bruel-Jungerman et al., 2006; Darcy et al., 2014). Stress, aging, and some neuropsychiatric conditions decrease proliferation rates and responsiveness of abGCs (Ben Abdallah et al., 2010; Snyder et al., 2011). This may contribute to intensified stress responses (Snyder et al., 2011), and decreased learning abilities in older animals (Montaron et al., 2020).

## Contribution of adult-born neurons to memory encoding

The DG converts EC inputs into highly decorrelated representations in CA3 (Fyhn et al., 2007). This is achieved by changes in the correlated activity of the same sparse subset of GCs between similar contexts, such as when rats explore enclosures of slightly different shapes. Niibori et al. (2012) measured the overlap between CA3 cells activated during encoding and re-exposure using a cellular imaging approach, and found that suppressing neurogenesis disrupts the decorrelation of highly overlapping (but not dissimilar) contexts. Behavioral evidence suggests that critical period abGCs are important for tasks requiring separation of highly similar contexts, such as contextual fear discrimination or re-learning of a shock zone location (Table 1); however, these cells appear dispensable for learning a location in the water maze (Sahay et al., 2011; Burghardt et al., 2012). Intriguingly, blocking all outputs from GCs older than 3-4 weeks improves contextual fear conditioning (CFC) performance, suggesting that pattern separation not only relies on abGCs, but could be counteracted by mGCs (Nakashiba et al., 2012). abGCs might recruit inhibitory circuits to limit the activation of the same GCs in similar contexts *via* lateral and feedback inhibition, providing a potential mechanism for pattern separation (Kitamura et al., 2009; Engin et al., 2015; Temprana et al., 2015; Figure 1B).

Despite these advances, the extent of abGC contribution to pattern separation remains ambiguous, largely due to inconsistencies around defining and manipulating relevant neuronal populations,
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 1</figcaption></figure>

Simplified hippocampal circuitry and the role of adult neurogenesis in pattern separation in the dentate gyrus (DG). (A) Schematic hippocampal circuitry from a mouse brain coronal section. Beyond the basic trisynaptic loop (EC-DG-CA3-CA1, black), some entorhinal cortex (EC) inputs go directly to CA1/CA3, while some CA3 axons project to CA2, send collaterals to other CA3 neurons, and feed back to the DG (blue). (B) Adult-born GCs (abGCs) achieve pattern separation by limiting the activation of the same mature GCs (mGCs) in similar contexts. (C) "Time-stamping" could link contemporary events A and B, but separate remote event C by activating a changing population of abGCs.

and in the behavioral paradigms used (Table 1). More specific DG-based pattern separation paradigms, optogenetic manipulations, and simultaneous recordings of abGCs and mature hippocampal cell types may help elucidate the precise role of abGCs in memory formation. Disrupted pattern separation in some, but improved performance in other hippocampus-based tasks suggests that abGCs may serve additional functions beyond pattern separation, depending on the behavioral paradigm.

Aimone et al. (2006) proposed that abGCs link memories encoded in close succession, while separating remote memories (Figure 1C). Because hyperexcitable DG cells are preferentially included into engrams (Park et al., 2016), critical period abGCs may be more readily recruited into any memory trace. This generates overlapping representations in CA3 that can be activated by the context represented in any of the temporally associated engrams. Therefore, integration of young abGCs into hippocampal engrams may help connect contemporary memories (Cai et al., 2016), while

more mature abGC populations support pattern separation (Aimone et al., 2010). The involvement of juvenile-born GCs (Kesner et al., 2014) in “time-stamping” has been described in a task where animals use spatial cues to generate preference for a temporally paired spatial location. Lesions in either cell population eliminated preference for the cued location, suggesting disrupted associations between events occurring close in time.

Recently, new findings have questioned the validity of the “time-stamping” hypothesis. Whereas abGCs are indeed more likely to be recruited during spatial memory encoding and activated during retrieval (Kee et al., 2007; Trouche et al., 2009; Stone et al., 2011; Gu et al., 2012; Martinez-Canabal et al., 2013), little overlap was found between abGCs activated during encoding or retrieval of contextual fear memories (Kumar et al., 2020). This suggests that either abGCs are activated by behavioral states rather than specific events or contexts (Erwin et al., 2020), or that limited overlap between the two populations could be a general property of DG
engrams (Denny et al., 2014). Another line of recent findings shows that maturing abGCs maintain their hyperexcitable properties for several months beyond the proposed critical period. These studies injected rats with various thymidine analogs to birthdate GC populations before quantifying their activity using immediate early gene expression. abGCs remained excitable especially in younger animals and animals that were offered environmental stimulation, and their activation supported learning even in older animals (Ohline et al., 2018; Montaron et al., 2020). This questions the idea of temporal integration and the long-standing view that abGCs exert their memory-related functions merely during their first weeks of existence (Alme et al., 2010).

## Adult-born neurons and memory consolidation

abGCs stably integrated into the hippocampal circuitry may also influence later stages of memory processing. Classical views of systems consolidation have held that after encoding, memories progressively lose their hippocampal dependence before transferring completely to neocortex (Frankland and Bontempi, 2005). Prefrontal cortex engrams are strengthened by CA3 and CA1 ripples (Nakashiba et al., 2009), while hippocampal engrams are gradually silenced (Kitamura et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2018).

Some evidence suggests that abGCs promote memory consolidation during sleep, when hippocampal and neocortical engrams are reactivated, and synapses are selectively strengthened or renormalized by dendritic remodeling (Mirescu et al., 2006; de Vivo et al., 2017; Li W. et al., 2017). abGCs active during CFC learning are reactivated during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and both optogenetic stimulation and silencing of reactivated abGCs disrupt consolidation (Kumar et al., 2020). Blocking neurogenesis reduces non-REM sleep and disrupts consolidation-related oscillations and cortex-hippocampus interaction, leading to poor spatial memory performance (Sippel et al., 2020). Further, the rate of neurogenesis also seems to determine the hippocampus-dependent period of memories (Kitamura et al., 2009). Although none of these studies directly links abGC engrams to these changes, or specifically accounts for sleep-induced changes in neurogenesis levels, they do demonstrate that abGCs are involved in sleep-related consolidation.

## Neurogenesis affects memory stability and causes forgetting

Hippocampal representations of consolidated remote memories are reactivated upon retrieval. This destabilizes engrams, allowing protein synthesis-dependent reconsolidation processes to update, strengthen, or silence them (Suzuki et al., 2004). Both immature and critical period abGCs are reactivated during retrieval, however, blocking protein synthesis in the immature population alone affects reconsolidation (Lods et al., 2021). Updating of memories is impaired in the novel object recognition task when an even younger abGC population is ablated, further supporting that highly immature abGCs mediate reconsolidation (Suárez-Pereira and Carrión, 2015). The emerging unique roles of abGCs in post-encoding memory

strengthening was recently demonstrated; chemogenetic stimulation during retrieval of abGCs, but not mGCs, improved remote memory strength and accuracy in rats (Lods et al., 2022).

A growing body of evidence suggests that increased neurogenesis after memory encoding promotes forgetting (Table 1). For instance, pharmacologically enhancing neurogenesis increases the forgetting of remote CFC memories after long re-exposures to the original context make them return to the hippocampus (Ishikawa et al., 2016). This has been explained by gradual elimination of existing connections through synaptic competition with abGCs (Murray et al., 2020), and reduction in LTP persistence through feedback and feedforward inhibition (Alam et al., 2018). Neurogenesis also disrupts perineuronal nets in CA1, which otherwise protect memories from degradation by limiting interneuron activity (Evans et al., 2022).

Removal of a small number of connections may only reduce memory precision, allowing recall by cues slightly different from the original encoding context (generalization) (Ko and Frankland, 2021). This might involve pruning of synapses that mediate feedforward inhibition (Ruediger et al., 2011). Once more connections are weakened, memories become inaccessible. High postnatal neurogenesis may even explain why early childhood memories are forgotten in many species (infantile amnesia) (Akers et al., 2014). Memory representations are not fully erased, as optogenetic reactivation of DG engrams can partially recover these memories (Guskjolen et al., 2018).

Replacement of old memories with updated novel memories can occur in similar contexts without interference. Indeed, neurogenesis is involved specifically in tasks requiring high cognitive flexibility, such as re-learning of a changed spatial location. In this case, ablation of neurogenesis prevents, while expansion of the abGC population promotes better search strategies (Garthe et al., 2009; Burghardt et al., 2012; Swan et al., 2014; Berdugo-Vega et al., 2021). Increased post-training neurogenesis weakens memories acquired in the water maze, which ultimately enables later re-learning of the task (Epp et al., 2016). Therefore, abGCs might promote forgetting to subsequently support encoding of novel memories.

## Discussion

Neural circuits require flexibility to adapt to changing environments, and stability to preserve information. The brain uses two main approaches to achieve transience: synaptic plasticity and cellular plasticity, or neurogenesis. Turnover of dendritic spines is undoubtedly the primary mechanism of structural plasticity behind learning, raising the question of why the DG needs neurogenesis beyond the synaptic modulation of mGCs.

Memory encoding by abGCs adds an anterograde form of transience to the hippocampus. Computational models support that abGCs optimize the balance between pattern separation and completion (Becker, 2005; Weisz and Argibay, 2009; O'Donnell and Sejnowski, 2014; Finnegan and Becker, 2015). abGCs might be used specifically to incorporate information about new experiences into engrams in familiar contexts (Aimone et al., 2009). Importantly, the inherent temporality of neurogenesis could hardly be replicated by synaptic plasticity. Most research into temporal sequence generation in the hippocampus has focused on CA1 and CA2 (MacDonald et al., 2013; Mankin et al., 2015), but the contribution of DG abGCs merits further investigations.
<table><caption>TABLE 1 Key studies on the effect of hippocampal neurogenesis on behavioral pattern separation and forgetting.</caption><thead><tr><th>Experiment</th><th>Neurogenesis manipulation</th><th>Manipulation approach</th><th>abGC identification</th><th>Performance</th><th>Subjects (sex, age)</th><th>Supports involvement of abGCs?</th><th>References</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="8"><strong>Pattern separation</strong></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">CFC</td><td>↑</td><td>Genetic Bax ablation in NPCs</td><td>Dcx, BrdU</td><td>↑</td><td>MF 14-18 weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Sahay et al., 2011; Besnard and Sahay, 2021</td></tr><tr><td>↓</td><td>X-ray irradiation</td><td>Dcx</td><td>↓</td><td></td><td>✓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>↓</td><td>Nestin-rtTA/Tet mice</td><td>CldU</td><td>↓</td><td>M 8 weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Tronel et al., 2010</td></tr><tr><td>Ablation</td><td>Nestin-HSV-TK mice</td><td>Ki67, NeuroD</td><td>↓ When contexts similar</td><td>M 10 weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Niibori et al., 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Touchscreen location discrimination</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>BrdU</td><td>↑</td><td>M 3-22 months</td><td>✓</td><td>Creer et al., 2010</td></tr><tr><td>Radial arm maze Touchscreen location discrimination</td><td>↓</td><td>X-ray irradiation and viral Wnt knockdown</td><td>Dcx</td><td>↓ When contexts similar</td><td>F 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Clelland et al., 2009</td></tr><tr><td>CFC with changed shock zone</td><td>Ablation</td><td>X-ray irradiation of GFAP-TK mice</td><td>Dcx</td><td>↓</td><td>M 10+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Burghardt et al., 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Water maze</td><td>Ablation</td><td>Genetic Bax overexpression in NPCs</td><td>BrdU, Dcx, apoptotic marker</td><td>↓</td><td>M 14 weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Dupret et al., 2008</td></tr><tr><td>Novel object recognition</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>Dcx</td><td>↑ When contexts similar</td><td>F 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Bolz et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Continuous novel object recognition</td><td>Silencing 4-7 weeks old abGCs</td><td>Optogenetic silencing in abGC-ArchT mice</td><td>Opto-tagging</td><td>↑</td><td>M 4-6 months</td><td>✓</td><td>McHugh et al., 2022</td></tr><tr><td>CFC</td><td>Postnatal ablation</td><td>DNMT1 knockout</td><td>BrdU</td><td>↑ In M</td><td>MF 3-5 months</td><td>X</td><td>Cushman et al., 2012</td></tr><tr><td>Touchscreen location discrimination</td><td>↓</td><td>GFAP-TK mice</td><td>Dcx</td><td>↑ In reversal phase</td><td>M 8+ weeks</td><td>X</td><td>Swan et al., 2014</td></tr><tr><td>Water maze</td><td>↓</td><td>GFAP-TK rats</td><td>Dcx</td><td>No effect<br/>↓ Under cold-water stress</td><td>*M 12+ weeks</td><td>X</td><td>O'Leary et al., 2021</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><strong>Neurogenesis-mediated forgetting</strong></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">CFC<br/>Water maze<br/>Incidental context learning</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise or proneurogenic drugs</td><td>Retrovirus-driven GFP, Dcx, Ki67</td><td>Increased forgetting</td><td>? 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Akers et al., 2014</td></tr><tr><td>↓</td><td>Post-training temozolomide treatment or TK+ mice</td><td></td><td>Improved retention</td><td></td><td>✓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Water maze<br/>Odor-context paired-associates learning</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>Dcx</td><td>Increased forgetting but improved reversal learning</td><td>MF 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Epp et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>↓</td><td>Post-training vanganciclovir treatment or TK+ mice</td><td></td><td>Exercise failed to induce forgetting</td><td></td><td>✓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CFC<br/>Water maze<br/>Paired associates learning</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>Dcx</td><td>Increased forgetting and improved reversal learning</td><td>*M ?</td><td>✓</td><td>Scott et al., 2021</td></tr><tr><td>CFC</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise or p53 knockout</td><td>Dcx</td><td>Increased forgetting of recent memories</td><td>MF 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Gao et al., 2018</td></tr><tr><td>CFC</td><td>↑</td><td>Memantine treatment</td><td>BrdU</td><td>Increased forgetting of remote memories after long re-exposures to training context</td><td>M 8+ weeks</td><td>✓</td><td>Ishikawa et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Paired associates learning</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>Dcx</td><td>Increased forgetting</td><td>↑</td><td>✓</td><td>Epp et al., 2021</td></tr><tr><td>Water maze</td><td>↑</td><td>Voluntary exercise</td><td>BrdU, Dcx</td><td>No effect</td><td>*M 6+ weeks</td><td>X</td><td>Kodali et al., 2016</td></tr><tr><td>Water maze</td><td>↓</td><td>Post-training γ irradiation</td><td>BrdU, Dcx</td><td>No effect</td><td>*M 6+ weeks</td><td>X</td><td>Snyder et al., 2005</td></tr></tbody></table>

Information not reported in papers labeled with “?” Most studied use mouse models, while those labeled “use rats. M, males; F, females. Dcx, doubleortin (1-3 weeks old neurons); BrdU, CldU: thymidine analogs (proliferating cells); Ki67 (proliferating cells); NeuroD (immature neurons).
abGCs also confer retrograde transience on DG engrams through weakening and elimination of existing connections. Novel DG engrams may be “overfitted” and thus require generalization for optimal expression through neurogenesis, which acts as a regularizer in neuronal networks (Richards and Frankland, 2017; Tran et al., 2022). By eliminating unnecessary details while maintaining core features, neurogenesis may make memories easier to recall in changing or noisy environments. Neurogenesis also helps “clear up” remnants of remote hippocampal engrams already consolidated in the cortex, similar to sleep that serves the same function on a shorter timescale (Alam et al., 2018). Models support that neurogenesis makes room for new memories and prevents interferences (Wiskott et al., 2006).

As brains have become more complex throughout evolution, neurogenesis in the DG was maintained and repurposed. Some argue that it confers key functional benefits that underpin the evolutionary success of mammals (Kempermann, 2012), while others dismiss it as an evolutionary remnant, given its low rates, especially in highly cognitively developed species. As neurogenesis is associated with energy costs, oxidative stress, and oncogenesis (Walton et al., 2012; Batista et al., 2014), its maintenance may only be beneficial in animals that need to flexibly adapt to rapidly changing or enriched environments (Abrous et al., 2021). Indeed, most generalists (e.g., rodents) show neurogenesis, but mammals living in stable or homogenous environments do not (e.g., cetaceans).

The outstanding cognitive abilities of the human brain are thought to result from plasticity. Yet, the maintenance of DG neurogenesis throughout adulthood remains debated (Boldrini et al., 2018; Sorrells et al., 2018), mainly due to a lack of non-invasive research methods. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing recently verified the presence of scarce immature GCs in the adult human DG, with a marked reduction in Alzheimer's disease (Zhou et al., 2022). Whether these cells are actively generated during adulthood or retained in an immature state is unclear. Further research is required to establish if human neurogenesis has any cognitive benefits or functional implications in neuropsychiatric conditions (Mishra et al., 2022).

This review supports the idea that abGCs can participate in the formation of hippocampal memories and influence mGCs to help encoding, generalization, and forgetting. abGCs bring transience to the hippocampus both by adding and removing information about new events, experiences, or environments. Experimental standardization and technological advances can help resolve contradictions in the literature, for example, by combining abGC labeling, in vivo recording with engram cell- and synapse-tagging (Choi et al., 2018), and more advanced DG-specific

behavioral paradigms. Standardized definitions of abGC versus mGC populations should also help draw clearer conclusions. Nevertheless if one accepts that, in addition to preserving information, a major goal of memory is to optimize behavior, a large body of evidence now supports adult neurogenesis as a meaningful contributor to hippocampal memory functions.

## Author contributions

This work was originally written by OF as part of a 3rd year literature review assignment at Durham University. OF and VC: conceptualization. OF, ST, and VC: writing. VC: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

## Funding

Research in ST's laboratory is funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR-19-CE37-00036 and ANR-21-CE16-0015), the NARSAD BBRF (award 24925), and the Foundation NRJ-Institut de France. Research in VC's laboratory is funded by BBSRC (BB/W007347/1), the Royal Society (RGS\R1\221097), and Durham University Seedcorn Funds.

## Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

## References

Abrous, D. N., Koehl, M., and Lemoine, M. (2021). A Baldwin interpretation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis: From functional relevance to physiopathology. *Mol. Psychiatry* 2021, 1–20. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01172-4

Aimone, J. B., Deng, W., and Gage, F. H. (2010). Adult neurogenesis: Integrating theories and separating functions. *Trends Cogn. Sci.* 14, 325–337. doi: 10.1016/J.TICS. 2010.04.003

Aimone, J. B., Wiles, J., and Gage, F. H. (2006). Potential role for adult neurogenesis in the encoding of time in new memories. *Nat. Neurosci.* 9, 723–727. doi: 10.1038/NN 1707

Aimone, J. B., Wiles, J., and Gage, F. H. (2009). Computational influence of adult neurogenesis on memory encoding. *Neuron* 61, 187–202. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2008. 11.026

Akers, K. G., Martinez-Canabal, A., Restivo, L., Yiu, A. P., de Cristofaro, A., Hsiang, H.-L., et al. (2014). Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy. *Science* 344, 598–602. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1248903

Alam, M. J., Kitamura, T., Saitoh, Y., Ohkawa, N., Kondo, T., and Inokuchi, K. (2018). Adult neurogenesis conserves hippocampal memory capacity. *J. Neurosci.* 38, 6854–6863. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2976-17.2018

Alme, C. B., Buzzetti, R. A., Marrone, D. F., Leutgeb, J. K., Chawla, M. K., Schaner, M. J., et al. (2010). Hippocampal granule cells opt for early retirement. *Hippocampus* 20, 1109–1123. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20810

Batista, C. M., Mariano, E. D., Barbosa, B. J. A. P., Morgalla, M., Marie, S. K. N., Teixeira, M. J., et al. (2014). Adult neurogenesis and glial oncogenesis: When the process fails. *Biomed. Res. Int.* 2014:438639. doi: 10.1155/2014/438639
Becker, S. (2005). A computational principle for hippocampal learning and neurogenesis. *Hippocampus* 15, 722-738. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20095

Ben Abdallah, N., Slomianka, L., Vysotski, A. L., and Lipp, H. P. (2010). Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice. *Neurobiol. Aging* 31, 151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.NEUROBIOLAGING.2008.03.002

Berdugo-Vega, G., Arias-Gil, G., López-Fernández, A., Artegiani, B., Wasielewska, J. M., Lee, C. C., et al. (2020). Increasing neurogenesis refines hippocampal activity rejuvenating navigational learning strategies and contextual memory throughout life. *Nat. Commun.* 11, 1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14026-z

Berdugo-Vega, G., Lee, C. C., Garthe, A., Kempermann, G., and Calegari, F. (2021). Adult-born neurons promote cognitive flexibility by improving memory precision and indexing. *Hippocampus* 31, 1068-1079. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.23373

Bernier, B. E., Lacagnina, A. F., Ayoub, A., Shue, F., Zemelman, B. V., Krasne, F. B., et al. (2017). Dentate gyrus contributes to retrieval as well as encoding: Evidence from context fear conditioning, recall, and extinction. *J. Neurosci.* 37:6359. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3029-16.2017

Besnard, A., and Sahay, A. (2021). Enhancing adult neurogenesis promotes contextual fear memory discrimination and activation of hippocampal-dorsolateral septal circuits. *Behav. Brain Res.* 399:112917. doi: 10.1016/j.BBR.2020.112917

Bliss, T. V. P., and Lomo, T. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. *J. Physiol.* 232, 331-356. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1973SP010273

Boldrini, M., Fulmore, C. A., Tartt, A. N., Simeon, L. R., Pavlova, I., Poposka, V., et al. (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout aging. *Cell Stem Cell* 22, 589-599.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.STEM.2018.03.015

Bolz, L., Heigele, S., and Bischofberger, J. (2015). Running improves pattern separation during novel object recognition. *Brain Plast.* 1:129. doi: 10.3233/BPL-150010

Bruel-Jungerman, E., Davis, S., Rampon, C., and Laroche, S. (2006). Long-term potentiation enhances neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. *J. Neurosci.* 26, 5888-5893. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0782-06.2006

Burghardt, N. S., Park, E. H., Hen, R., and Fenton, A. A. (2012). Adult-born hippocampal neurons promote cognitive flexibility in mice. *Hippocampus* 22, 1795-1808. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.22013

Cai, D. J., Aharoni, D., Shuman, T., Shobe, J., Biane, J., Song, W., et al. (2016). A shared neural ensemble links distinct contextual memories encoded close in time. *Nature* 534, 115-118. doi: 10.1038/nature17955

Cameron, H. A., and Mckay, R. D. G. (2001). Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 435, 406-417. doi: 10.1002/CNE.1040

Chawla, M. K., Guzowski, J. F., Ramirez-Amaya, V., Lipa, P., Hoffman, K. L., Marriott, L. K., et al. (2005). Sparse, environmentally selective expression of Arc RNA in the upper blade of the rodent fascia dentata by brief spatial experience. *Hippocampus* 15, 579-586. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20091

Choi, J., Sim, S., Kim, J., Choi, D., Oh, J., Ye, S., et al. (2018). Interregional synaptic maps among engrah cells underlie memory formation. *Science* 360, 430-435. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAS9204

Ciric, T., Cahill, S. P., and Snyder, J. S. (2019). Dentate gyrus neurons that are born at the peak of development, but not before or after, die in adulthood. *Brain Behav.* 9:e01435. doi: 10.1002/BRB3.1435

Clelland, C. D., Choi, M., Romberg, C., Clemenson, G. D., Fragniere, A., Tyers, P., et al. (2009). A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. *Science* 325, 210-213. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1173215/SUPPL_FILE/CLELLAND.SOM-.PDF

Creer, D. J., Romberg, C., Saksida, L. M., van Praag, H., and Bussey, T. J. (2010). Running enhances spatial pattern separation in mice. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 107, 2367-2372. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0911725107

Cushman, J. D., Maldonado, J., Kwon, E. E., Denise Garcia, A., Fan, G., Imura, T., et al. (2012). Juvenile neurogenesis makes essential contributions to adult brain structure and plays a sex-dependent role in fear memories. *Front. Behav. Neurosci.* 6:3. doi: 10.3389/FNBEH.2012.00003

Danielson, N. B. B., Kaifosh, P., Zaremba, J. D. D., Lovett-Barron, M., Tsai, J., Denny, C. A. A., et al. (2016). Distinct contribution of adult-born hippocampal granule cells to context encoding. *Neuron* 90, 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.NEURON.2016.02.019

Darcy, M. J., Trouche, S., Jin, S. X., and Feig, L. A. (2014). Ras-GRF2 mediates long-term potentiation, survival, and response to an enriched environment of newborn neurons in the hippocampus. *Hippocampus* 24, 1317-1329. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.2313

Dayer, A. G., Ford, A. A., Cleaver, K. M., Yassaee, M., and Cameron, H. A. (2003). Short-term and long-term survival of new neurons in the rat dentate gyrus. *J. Comp. Neurol.* 460, 563-572. doi: 10.1002/CNE.10675

de Vivo, L., Bellesi, M., Marshall, W., Bushong, E. A., Ellisman, M. H., Tononi, G., et al. (2017). Ultrastructural evidence for synaptic scaling across the wake/sleep cycle. *Science* 355, 507-510. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAH5982

Deisseroth, K., Singla, S., Toda, H., Monje, M., Palmer, T. D., and Malenka, R. C. (2004). Excitation-neurogenesis coupling in adult neural stem/progenitor cells. *Neuron* 42, 535-552. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00266-1

Denny, C. A., Kheirbek, M. A., Alba, E. L., Tanaka, K. F., Brachman, R. A., Laughman, K. B., et al. (2014). Hippocampal memory traces are differentially modulated by experience, time, and adult neurogenesis. *Neuron* 83, 189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.NEURON.2014.05.018

Dupret, D., Revest, J. M., Koehl, M., Ichas, F., de Giorgi, F., Costet, P., et al. (2008). Spatial relational memory requires hippocampal adult neurogenesis. *PLoS One* 3:e1959. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0001959

Engin, E., Zarnowska, E. D., Benke, D., Tsvetkov, E., Sigal, M., Keist, R., et al. (2015). Tonic inhibitory control of dentate gyrus granule cells by α5-containing GABAA receptors reduces memory interference. *J. Neurosci.* 35, 13698-13712. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1370-15.2015

Epp, J. R., Botly, L. C. P., Josselyn, S. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2021). Voluntary exercise increases neurogenesis and mediates forgetting of complex paired associates memories. *Neuroscience* 475, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.NEUROSCIENCE.2021.08.022

Epp, J. R., Mera, R. S., Köhler, S., Josselyn, S. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2016). Neurogenesis-mediated forgetting minimizes proactive interference. *Nat. Commun.* 7, 1-8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10838

Erwin, S. R., Sun, W., Copeland, M., Lindo, S., Spruston, N., and Cembrowski, M. S. (2020). A sparse, spatially biased subtype of mature granule cell dominates recruitment in hippocampal-associated behaviors. *Cell Rep.* 31:107551. doi: 10.1016/j CELREP.2020.107551

Evans, A., Terstege, D. J., Scott, G. A., Tsutsui, M., and Epp, J. R. (2022). Neurogenesis mediated plasticity is associated with reduced neuronal activity in CA1 during context fear memory retrieval. *Sci. Rep.* 12, 1-16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10947-w

Finnegan, R., and Becker, S. (2015). Neurogenesis paradoxically decreases both pattern separation and memory interference. *Front. Syst. Neurosci.* 9:136. doi: 10.3389/FNSYS.2015.00136

Frankland, P. W., and Bontempi, B. (2005). The organization of recent and remote memories. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 6, 119-130. doi: 10.1038/nrn1607

Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Treves, A., Moser, M. B., and Moser, E. I. (2007). Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. *Nature* 446, 190-194. doi: 10.1038/NATURE05601

Gao, A., Xia, F., Guskjolen, A. J., Ramsaran, A. I., Santoro, A., Josselyn, S. A., et al. (2018). Elevation of hippocampal neurogenesis induces a temporally graded pattern of forgetting of contextual fear memories. *J. Neurosci.* 38, 3190-3198. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3126-17.2018

Garthe, A., Behr, J., and Kempermann, G. (2009). Adult-generated hippocampal neurons allow the flexible use of spatially precise learning strategies. *PLoS One* 4:e5464. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0005464

Ge, S., Yang, C., Hsu, K., Ming, G., and Song, H. (2007). A critical period for enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated neurons of the adult brain. *Neuron* 54, 559-566. doi: 10.1016/j.NEURON.2007.05.002

Gould, E., Beylin, A., Tanapat, P., Reeves, A., and Shors, T. J. (1999). Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. *Nat. Neurosci.* 2, 260-265. doi: 10.1038/6365

Gozel, O., and Gerstner, W. (2021). A functional model of adult dentate gyrus neurogenesis. *Elife* 10:e66463. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136176

Gu, Y., Arruda-Carvalho, M., Wang, J., Janoschka, S. R., Josselyn, S. A., Frankland, P. W., et al. (2012). Optical controlling reveals time-dependent roles for adult-born dentate granule cells. *Nat. Neurosci.* 15, 1700-1706. doi: 10.1038/NN.3260

Guo, N., Soden, M. E., Herber, C., Kim, M. T. W., Besnard, A., Lin, P., et al. (2018). Dentate granule cell recruitment of feedforward inhibition governs engram maintenance and remote memory generalization. *Nat. Med.* 24, 438-449. doi: 10.1038/nm.4491

Guskjolen, A., Kenney, J., de la Parra, J., Yeung, B., Josselyn, S., and Frankland, P. (2018). Recovery of “Lost” infant memories in mice. *Curr. Biol.* 28, 2283-2290.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.CUB.2018.05.059

Hebb, D. O. (2005). *The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory.* New York, NY: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9781410612403

Hendricks, W. D., Chen, Y., Bensen, A. L., Westbrook, G. L., and Schnell, E. (2017). Short-term depression of sprouted mossy fiber synapses from adult-born granule cells. *J. Neurosci.* 37, 5722-5735. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0761-17.2017

Hochgerner, H., Zeisel, A., Lönnerberg, P., and Linnarsson, S. (2018). Conserved properties of dentate gyrus neurogenesis across postnatal development revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. *Nat. Neurosci.* 21, 290-299. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0056-2

Ishikawa, R., Fukushima, H., Frankland, P. W., and Kida, S. (2016). Hippocampal neurogenesis enhancers promote forgetting of remote fear memory after hippocampal reactivation by retrieval. *Elife* 5:e17464. doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.17464

Jungenitz, T., Beining, M., Radic, T., Deller, T., Cuntz, H., Jedlicka, P., et al. (2018). Structural homo- and heterosynaptic plasticity in mature and adult newborn rat hippocampal granule cells. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 115, E4670-E4679. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1801889115

Kee, N., Teixeira, C. M., Wang, A. H., and Frankland, P. W. (2007). Preferential incorporation of adult-generated granule cells into spatial memory networks in the dentate gyrus. *Nat. Neurosci.* 10, 355-362. doi: 10.1038/NN1847

Kempermann, G. (2012). New neurons for "survival of the fittest." *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.* 13, 727-736. doi: 10.1038/nrn3319
Kempermann, G., Gast, D., Kronenberg, G., Yamaguchi, M., and Gage, F. H. (2003). Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. *Development* 130, 391–399. doi: 10.1242/DEV.00203

Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., and Gage, F. H. (1997a). Genetic influence on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 94, 10409–10414.

Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., and Gage, F. H. (1997b). More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. *Nature* 386, 493–495. doi: 10.1038/386493a0

Kesner, R. P., Hui, X., Sommer, T., Wright, C., Barrera, V. R., and Fanselow, M. S. (2014). The role of postnatal neurogenesis in supporting remote memory and spatial metric processing. *Hippocampus* 24, 1663–1671. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.22346

Kitamura, T., Ogawa, S. K., Roy, D. S., Okuyama, T., Morrissey, M. D., Smith, L. M., et al. (2017). Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory. *Science* 356, 73–78. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAM6808

Kitamura, T., Saitoh, Y., Takashima, N., Murayama, A., Niibori, Y., Ageta, H., et al. (2009). Adult neurogenesis modulates the hippocampus-dependent period of associative fear memory. *Cell* 139, 814–827. doi: 10.1016/J CELL.2009.10.020

Ko, S. Y., and Frankland, P. W. (2021). Neurogenesis-dependent transformation of hippocampal engrams. *Neurosci. Lett.* 762:136176. doi: 10.1016/J.NEULET.2021.136176

Kodali, M., Megahed, T., Mishra, V., Shuai, B., Hattiangady, B., and Shetty, A. K. (2016). Voluntary running exercise-mediated enhanced neurogenesis does not obliterate retrograde spatial memory. *J. Neurosci.* 36, 8112–8122. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0766-16.2016

Kumar, D., Koyanagi, I., Carrier-Ruiz, A., Vergara, P., Srinivasan, S., Sugaya, Y., et al. (2020). Sparse activity of hippocampal adult-born neurons during REM sleep is necessary for memory consolidation. *Neuron* 107, 552–565.e10. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2020.05.008

Lacefield, C. O., Itskov, V., Reardon, T., Hen, R., and Gordon, J. A. (2012). Effects of adult-generated granule cells on coordinated network activity in the dentate gyrus. *Hippocampus* 22, 106–116. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20860

Leutgeb, J. K., Leutgeb, S., Moser, M. B., and Moser, E. I. (2007). Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. *Science* 315, 961–966.

Li, L., He, Y., Zhao, M., and Jiang, J. (2013). Collective cell migration: Implications for wound healing and cancer invasion. *Burns Trauma* 1, 2321–3868.

Li, L., Sultan, S., Heigele, S., Schmidt-Salzmann, C., Toni, N., and Bischofberger, J. (2017). Silent synapses generate sparse and orthogonal action potential firing in adult-born hippocampal granule cells. *Elife* 6:e23612. doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.23612

Li, W., Ma, L., Yang, G., and Gan, W. B. (2017). REM sleep selectively prunes and maintains new synapses in development and learning. *Nat. Neurosci.* 20, 427–437. doi: 10.1038/nn.4479

Llorens-Martín, M., Jurado-Arjona, J., Avila, J., and Hernández, F. (2015). Novel connection between newborn granule neurons and the hippocampal CA2 field. *Exp. Neurol.* 263, 285–292. doi: 10.1016/J.EXPNEUROL.2014.10.021

Lods, M., Mortessagne, P., Pacary, E., Terral, G., Farrugia, F., Mazier, W., et al. (2022). Chemogenetic stimulation of adult neurogenesis, and not neonatal neurogenesis, is sufficient to improve long-term memory accuracy. *Prog. Neurobiol.* 219:102364. doi: 10.1016/J.PNEUROBIO.2022.102364

Lods, M., Pacary, E., Mazier, W., Farrugia, F., Mortessagne, P., Masachs, N., et al. (2021). Adult-born neurons immature during learning are necessary for remote memory reconsolidation in rats. *Nat. Commun.* 12, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22069-4

Lois, C., and Alvarez-Buylla, A. (1993). Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 90, 2074–2077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.2074

Luna, V. M., Anacker, C., Burghardt, N. S., Khandaker, H., Andreu, V., Millette, A., et al. (2019). Adult-born hippocampal neurons bidirectionally regulate entorhinal inputs into the dentate gyrus. *Science* 364, 578–583. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAT8789

MacDonald, C. J., Carrow, S., Place, R., and Eichenbaum, H. (2013). Distinct hippocampal time cell sequences represent odor memories in immobilized rats. *J. Neurosci.* 33, 14607–14616. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1537-13.2013

Mankin, E. A., Diehl, G. W., Sparks, F. T., Leutgeb, S., and Leutgeb, J. K. (2015). Hippocampal CA2 activity patterns change over time to a larger extent than between spatial contexts. *Neuron* 85, 190–201. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2014.12.001

Martinez-Canabal, A., Akers, K. G., Josselyn, S. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2013). Age-dependent effects of hippocampal neurogenesis suppression on spatial learning. *Hippocampus* 23, 66–74. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.22054

McAvoy, K. M., Scobie, K. N., Berger, S., Russo, C., Guo, N., Decharatanachart, P., et al. (2016). Modulating neuronal competition dynamics in the dentate gyrus to rejuvenate aging memory circuits. *Neuron* 91, 1356. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2016.08.009

McHugh, S. B., Lopes-dos-Santos, V., Gava, G. P., Hartwich, K., Tam, S. K. E., Bannerman, D. M., et al. (2022). Adult-born dentate granule cells promote hippocampal population sparsity. *Nat. Neurosci.* 25, 1481–1491. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01176-5

Mirescu, C., Peters, J. D., Noiman, L., and Gould, E. (2006). Sleep deprivation inhibits adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus by elevating glucocorticoids. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 103, 19170–19175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608644103

Mishra, R., Phan, T., Kumar, P., Morrissey, Z., Gupta, M., Hollands, C., et al. (2022). Augmenting neurogenesis rescues memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease

by restoring the memory-storing neurons. *J. Exp. Med.* 219:e20220391. doi: 10.1084/JEM.20220391

Mongiat, L. A., Espósito, M. S., Lombardi, G., and Schinder, A. F. (2009). Reliable activation of immature neurons in the adult hippocampus. *PLoS One* 4:e5320. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0005320

Montaron, M. F., Charrier, V., Blin, N., Garcia, P., and Abrous, D. N. (2020). Responsiveness of dentate neurons generated throughout adult life is associated with resilience to cognitive aging. *Aging Cell* 19:e13161. doi: 10.1111/ACEL.13161

Murray, K. D., Liu, X. B., King, A. N., Luu, J. D., and Cheng, H. J. (2020). Age-related changes in synaptic plasticity associated with mossy fiber terminal integration during adult neurogenesis. *eNeuro* 7, 1–16. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0030-20.2020

Nakashiba, T., Buhl, D. L., McHugh, T. J., and Tonegawa, S. (2009). Hippocampal CA3 output is crucial for ripple-associated reactivation and consolidation of memory. *Neuron* 62, 781–787. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.013

Nakashiba, T., Cushman, J. D., Pelkey, K. A., Renaudineau, S., Buhl, D. L., McHugh, T. J., et al. (2012). Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion. *Cell* 149, 188–201. doi: 10.1016/J CELL.2012.01.046

Ngwenya, L. B., Heyworth, N. C., Shwe, Y., Moore, T. L., and Rosene, D. L. (2015). Age-related changes in dentate gyrus cell numbers, neurogenesis, and associations with cognitive impairments in the rhesus monkey. *Front. Syst. Neurosci.* 9:102. doi: 10.3389/FNSYS.2015.00102

Niibori, Y., Yu, T. S., Epp, J. R., Akers, K. G., Josselyn, S. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2012). Suppression of adult neurogenesis impairs population coding of similar contexts in hippocampal CA3 region. *Nat. Commun.* 3, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2261

O'Donnell, C., and Sejnowski, T. J. (2014). Selective memory generalization by spatial patterning of protein synthesis. *Neuron* 82, 398–412. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2014.02.028

O'Leary, T. P., Askari, B., Lee, B., Darby, K., Knudson, C., Ash, A. M., et al. (2021). Inhibiting adult neurogenesis differentially affects spatial learning in females and males. *bioRxiv* [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2021.10.27.466135

Online, S. M., Wake, K. L., Hawkridge, M. V., Dinnunhan, M. F., Hegemann, R. U., Wilson, A., et al. (2018). Adult-born dentate granule cell excitability depends on the interaction of neuron age, ontogenetic age and experience. *Brain Struct. Funct.* 223, 3213–3228. doi: 10.1007/S00429-018-1685-2/FIGURES/6

Park, S., Kramer, E. E., Mercaldo, V., Rashid, A. J., Insel, N., Frankland, P. W., et al. (2016). Neuronal allocation to a hippocampal engram. *Neuropsychopharmacology* 41, 2987–2993. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.73

Pilz, G. A., Bottes, S., Betizeau, M., Jörg, D. J., Carta, S., Simons, B. D., et al. (2018). Live imaging of neurogenesis in the adult mouse hippocampus. *Science* 359, 658–662.

Rapp, P. R., and Gallagher, M. (1996). Preserved neuron number in the hippocampus of aged rats with spatial learning deficits. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 93, 9926–9930. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.93.18.9926

Restivo, L., Niibori, Y., Mercaldo, V., Josselyn, S. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2015). Development of adult-generated cell connectivity with excitatory and inhibitory cell populations in the hippocampus. *J. Neurosci.* 35, 10600–10612. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3238-14.2015

Richards, B. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2017). The persistence and transience of memory. *Neuron* 94, 1071–1084. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2017.04.037

Ruediger, S., Vittori, C., Bednarek, E., Genoud, C., Strata, P., Sacchetti, B., et al. (2011). Learning-related feedforward inhibitory connectivity growth required for memory precision. *Nature* 473, 514–518. doi: 10.1038/nature09946

Ryu, J. R., Hong, C. J., Kim, J. Y., Kim, E. K., Sun, W., and Yu, S. W. (2016). Control of adult neurogenesis by programmed cell death in the mammalian brain. *Mol. Brain* 9, 1–20. doi: 10.1186/S13041-016-0224-4

Sahay, A., Scobie, K. N., Hill, A. S., O'Carroll, C. M., Kheirbek, M. A., Burghardt, N. S., et al. (2011). Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. *Nature* 472, 466–470. doi: 10.1038/nature09817

Schmidt-Hieber, C., Jones, P., and Bischofberger, J. (2004). Enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated granule cells of the adult hippocampus. *Nature* 429, 184–187. doi: 10.1038/nature02553

Scott, G. A., Terstege, D. J., Roebuck, A. J., Gorzo, K. A., Vu, A. P., Howland, J. G., et al. (2021). Adult neurogenesis mediates forgetting of multiple types of memory in the rat. *Mol. Brain* 14, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/S13041-021-00808-4/FIGURES/4

Semon, R. (1921). *The mneme*. G. Allen & Unwin Limited. Available online at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rFfuAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA17&ots=4e3JbfekP2&sig=JteMg1F1JQZN1sq8zU6xlhvXuc (accessed February 1, 2022).

Sippel, D., Schwabedal, J., Snyder, J. C., Oyanedel, C. N., Bernas, S. N., Garthe, A., et al. (2020). Disruption of NREM sleep and sleep-related spatial memory consolidation in mice lacking adult hippocampal neurogenesis. *Sci. Rep.* 10, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72362-3

Snyder, J. S., Hong, N. S., McDonald, R. J., and Wojtowicz, J. M. (2005). A role for adult neurogenesis in spatial long-term memory. *Neuroscience* 130, 843–852. doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2004.10.009

Snyder, J. S., Soumier, A., Brewer, M., Pickel, J., and Cameron, H. A. (2011). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. *Nature* 476, 458–461. doi: 10.1038/nature10287
Sorrells, S. F., Paredes, M. F., Cebrian-Silla, A., Sandoval, K., Qi, D., Kelley, K. W., et al. (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. *Nature* 555, 377–381. doi: 10.1038/nature25975

Stone, S. S. D., Teixeira, C. M., Zaslavsky, K., Wheeler, A. L., Martinez-Canabal, A., Wang, A. H., et al. (2011). Functional convergence of developmentally and adult-generated granule cells in dentate gyrus circuits supporting hippocampus-dependent memory. *Hippocampus* 21, 1348–1362. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20845

Suárez-Pereira, I., and Carrión, ÁM. (2015). Updating stored memory requires adult hippocampal neurogenesis. *Sci. Rep.* 5, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/srep13993

Suzuki, A., Josselyn, S. A., Frankland, P. W., Masushige, S., Silva, A. J., and Kida, S. (2004). Memory Reconsolidation and Extinction Have Distinct Temporal and Biochemical Signatures. *J. Neurosci.* 24, 4787–4795. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5491-03. 2004

Swan, A. A., Clutton, J. E., Chary, P. K., Cook, S. G., Liu, G. G., and Drew, M. R. (2014). Characterization of the role of adult neurogenesis in touch-screen discrimination learning. *Hippocampus* 24, 1581–1591. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.22337

Tashiro, A., Makino, H., and Gage, F. H. (2007). Experience-specific functional modification of the dentate gyrus through adult neurogenesis: A critical period during an immature stage. *J. Neurosci.* 27, 3252–3259. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4941-06.2007

Tashiro, A., Sandler, V. M., Toni, N., Zhao, C., and Gage, F. H. (2006). NMDA-receptor-mediated, cell-specific integration of new neurons in adult dentate gyrus. *Nature* 442, 929–933. doi: 10.1038/nature05028

Temprana, S. G., Mongiat, L. A., Yang, S. M., Trinchero, M. F., Alvarez, D. D., Kropff, E., et al. (2015). Delayed coupling to feedback inhibition during a critical period for the integration of adult-born granule cells. *Neuron* 85, 116–130. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON. 2014.11.023

Toni, N., Laplagne, D. A., Zhao, C., Lombardi, G., Ribak, C. E., Gage, F. H., et al. (2008). Neurons born in the adult dentate gyrus form functional synapses with target cells. *Nat. Neurosci.* 11, 901–907. doi: 10.1038/nn.2156

Toni, N., Teng, E. M., Bushong, E. A., Aimone, J. B., Zhao, C., Consiglio, A., et al. (2007). Synapse formation on neurons born in the adult hippocampus. *Nat. Neurosci.* 10, 727–734. doi: 10.1038/NN1908

Tran, L. M., Santoro, A., Liu, L., Josselyn, S. A., Richards, B. A., and Frankland, P. W. (2022). Adult neurogenesis acts as a neural regularizer. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 119, e2206704119.

Tronel, S., Fabre, A., Charrier, V., Oliet, S. H. R., Gage, F. H., and Abrous, D. N. (2010). Spatial learning sculpts the dendritic arbor of adult-born hippocampal neurons. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 107, 7963–7968. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0914613107

Trouche, S., Bontempi, B., Roullet, P., and Rampon, C. (2009). Recruitment of adult-generated neurons into functional hippocampal networks contributes to updating and strengthening of spatial memory. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 106, 5919–5924. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0811054106

van Praag, H., Christie, B. R., Sejnowski, T. J., and Gage, F. H. (1999). Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 96, 13427–13431. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.96.23.13427

Walton, N. M., Shin, R., Tajinda, K., Heusner, C. L., Kogan, J. H., Miyake, S., et al. (2012). Adult neurogenesis transiently generates oxidative stress. *PLoS One* 7:e35264. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0035264

Weisz, V. I., and Argibay, P. F. (2009). A putative role for neurogenesis in neurocomputational terms: Inferences from a hippocampal model. *Cognition* 112, 229–240. doi: 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2009.05.001

Wiskott, L., Rasch, M. J., and Kempermann, G. (2006). A functional hypothesis for adult hippocampal neurogenesis: Avoidance of catastrophic interference in the dentate gyrus. *Hippocampus* 16, 329–343. doi: 10.1002/HIPO.20167

Yasuda, M., Johnson-Venkatesh, E. M., Zhang, H., Parent, J. M., Sutton, M. A., and Umemori, H. (2011). Multiple forms of activity-dependent competition refine hippocampal circuits in vivo. *Neuron* 70, 1128–1142. doi: 10.1016/J.NEURON.2011.04. 027

Zhao, C., Teng, E. M., Summers, R. G., Ming, G. L., and Gage, F. H. (2006). Distinct morphological stages of dentate granule neuron maturation in the adult mouse hippocampus. *J. Neurosci.* 26, 3–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3648-05.2006

Zhou, Y., Su, Y., Li, S., Kennedy, B. C., Zhang, D. Y., Bond, A. M., et al. (2022). Molecular landscapes of human hippocampal immature neurons across lifespan. *Nature* 607, 527–533. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04912-w