# Association between vaccination and the risk of central demyelination: results from a case-referent study

Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda, Caroline Papeix, Yann Hamon, Jacques J. Benichou, Lucien L. Abenhaim

► To cite this version:

Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda, Caroline Papeix, Yann Hamon, Jacques J. Benichou, Lucien L. Abenhaim. Association between vaccination and the risk of central demyelination: results from a case-referent study. Journal of Neurology, 2023, 270 (10), pp.4678-4686. 10.1007/s00415-023-11822-y. hal-04229533

HAL Id: hal-04229533

https://hal.science/hal-04229533v1

Submitted on 24 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# Association between vaccination and the risk of central demyelination: results from a case-referent study

Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda<sup>1,2,3,4</sup> • Caroline Papeix<sup>5,6</sup> • Yann Hamon<sup>1,7</sup> • Jacques Benichou<sup>4,8,9</sup> • Lucien Abenhaim<sup>1,7,10,11</sup>

Received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 10 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published online: 23 June 2023
© The Author(s) 2023

## Abstract

**Background** Few studies documented the potential association between vaccination and the risk of central demyelination (CD). Specifically, anti-hepatitis B and anti-human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have been the subject of distrust with regard to their implication to trigger CD.

**Methods** From a systematic national registry, patients with first signs of CD (cases) were identified and documented for their exposure to vaccination up to 24 months before the first signs occurred. This exposure was compared to that of a representative sample of general practice patients without a history of CD, randomly selected from a national registry (referents). CD cases were 2:1 matched on age, sex, index date (ID), and region of residence. Vaccines against influenza, HPV, hepatitis B and diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis–poliomyelitis–haemophilus (DTPPHae) were considered. Associations between vaccination and CD were assessed using multivariate conditional logistic regressions, controlled for confounding factors.

**Findings** 564 CD cases were matched to 1,128 randomly selected referents (age range: 2–79 years old). Overall, 123 (22%) CD cases and 320 (28%) referents had received at least one vaccine within 24 months before ID. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for any vaccination were 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.54–0.88] with respect to any CD first signs, 0.68 [0.51–0.90] for myelitis and 0.70 [0.42–1.17] for optic neuritis. Adjusted ORs for any CD first signs were 1.02 [0.71–1.47] for influenza vaccine (administered in 9.6% of cases and 10.4% of referents) and 0.72 [0.53–0.99] for DTPPHae vaccine (administered in 10.8% of cases and 14.5% of referents). Vaccines against hepatitis B and HPV were only administered in 1.1% and 1.2% of cases and in 2.9% and 3.2% of referents respectively, which statistically explained the point estimates < 1 (ORs of 0.39 [0.16–0.94] and of 0.32 [0.13–0.80]).

**Interpretation** No increased risk of CD incidence was observed amongst vaccinated patients. Lower rates of vaccination against hepatitis B and HPV observed in patients with CD compared to referents may be due to the reluctance of physicians to vaccinate patients considered at risk of CD.

**Keywords** Central demyelination · Vaccines · Multiple sclerosis · Case-referent study

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda
lamiae.grimaldi@aphp.fr

Caroline Papeix
cpapeix@for.paris

Yann Hamon
yann.hamon@remeds-research.com

Jacques Benichou
jacques.benichou@chu-rouen.fr

Lucien Abenhaim
lucien.abenhaim@gmail.com

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1">1 The PGRx Study Group, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 Pharmacology Department, Hospital Group Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Garches, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">3 University of Versailles-Paris Saclay, Montigny Le Bretonneux, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">4 Inserm U 1018 CESP, Villejuif, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">5 Neurology Department of Hospital foundation A de Rothschild, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">6 Paris-Cité University, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="7">7 RESAL, LA-SER Group, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="8">8 Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, CHU Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France</footnote>

<footnote n="9">9 Université de Rouen-Normandie, Rouen, France</footnote>

<footnote n="10">10 Department of Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="11">11 Centre for Risk Research Inc., Montreal, CanadaE</footnote>
## Introduction

Central demyelination (CD) is an immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system, which is manifested by a variety of non-specific and specific neurological symptoms that can precede the diagnosis of the disease by a few weeks to several years. The most common disorder is multiple sclerosis (MS) [1] whose first signs may be manifested by optic neuritis in 20% of cases [2]. The precise etiology of this disorder still remains largely unclear [3, 4], yet it is commonly agreed that the onset of the disease is influenced by genetic and environmental factors [5–7]. The importance of the environment has been highlighted by a study showing lack of genetic differences between monozygotic twins discordant for MS [8]. Evidence for involvement of the environment in MS development also comes from a variety of epidemiological studies linking MS to latitude [9, 10], vitamin D levels [11, 12], smoking status [5, 13–15] and exposure to certain infections (mainly Epstein–Barr virus) [5, 16, 17]. Some studies have suggested that immunization could play a role in the development of auto-immune disorders including CD, notably MS [18, 19]. It has been suggested that immune responses generated by infections or vaccination may cause trigger or exacerbate central nervous system autoimmunity in susceptible individuals [20, 21]. In some countries, particularly in France, pharmacovigilance reports have recorded a sizeable number of CD cases closely following vaccination, especially with the anti-hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) [22, 23]. Recent meta-analyses of observational studies explored the association between vaccines and the risk of CD [24, 25]. Most of these studies focussed on the risk of CD or MS following anti-hepatitis B vaccine or anti-human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, with controversial results. Indeed, most of these studies showed no association [26–30], whilst two studies suggested an increased risk of CD or MS after anti-hepatitis B or anti-HPV vaccines [31, 32], leading to vaccine distrust in some countries. However, some studies on the risk of CD associated with vaccines presenting major flaws or biases, for example, using the date of CD diagnosis or an imprecise date of first signs of CD. In the light of the persisting doubts about a possible link between vaccination and the risk of incident cases of CD, notably MS, a comprehensive case-referent epidemiological study was undertaken to evaluate the risk of CD following vaccination.

## Methods

Using two national registries, a case-referent study was conducted in France under the supervision of an independent Scientific Committee and following the guidelines for

Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices (GPP). The reporting followed the criteria of the STROBE Statement [33].

## Study population

Cases and referents were recruited prospectively using the PGRx information system. CD cases were identified within a systematic national registry (« PGRx-Demy» registry) assembled by 43 neurology centres specialized in central demyelination from across France, between December 2007 and July 2014. An on-site audit of recruitment and data quality was performed over a 2-month period. Referent-patients were recruited by a network of 406 general practitioners (GPs) participating in the “PGRx-GP” registry. Patients were offered participation regardless of their reason for consulting a physician. From these registries, patients were retained for this study if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) aged ≥ 2 years; (2) living in France; (3) able to undergo a telephone interview in French (the participant himself/herself or his/her parents); and (4) consenting to participate to the study (parental consent for minor participants).

## Central demyelination cases

Patients with a first lifetime sign of demyelination affecting the brain, spinal cord or optic nerve were identified from « PGRx-Demy» registry and documented for their exposure to common vaccines up to 24 months before the first sign occurred. CD was defined according to international conventions [34]. Patients with a personal history of CD at inclusion or presenting other disease that could explain the current episode suggestive of CD were excluded.

## Referents and matching

A representative sample of GP patients without a history of MS or CD was randomly selected from the « PGRx-GP» registry (i.e. referents' registry).

Two referents were matched to each CD case on age (the nearest age under 1 year of difference), sex, index date (first sign in cases and date of recruitment in referents; difference not exceeding 3 months) and region of residence (Northern or Southern France).

## Exposure to vaccination

In cases and referents, information on all medications (including vaccines and over-the-counter medication) used in the 24 months preceding the index date was collected through a structured and standardized telephone interview. Interviews lasted for 1 h and were conducted within 45 days of recruitment by trained interviewers using the previously validated Progressive Assisted Backward Active Recall
(PABAR) method [35, 36]. Parents of children younger than 18 years old were interviewed. To facilitate remembering the medications taken, an interview guide was provided to participants or their parents prior to the telephone interview. Patients and referents were asked to report any medications and vaccines received, even when not listed. Exposure to vaccines was also systematically informed by physicians, in cases and referents and reported using an electronic case notification form. Exposure to vaccines was considered as “certain” when either patients or their physicians provided a tangible proof for vaccination: vaccine batch number, vaccination booklet, prescription noted in health medical record, pharmacist's report or any other type of vaccination certificate. Vaccines against influenza, HPV, diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis–poliomyelitis–haemophilus (DTPPHae) and hepatitis B were considered.

## Time windows

The main time windows for exposure to vaccines (any vaccines) prior to the index date were 2, 6 and 24 months. These time windows were determined by the independent Scientific Committees to best capture potential associations between vaccines and the occurrence of CD.

## Statistical analysis

For each variable, if < 5% of cases and < 5% of referents had a missing value, the missing values were imputed, using simple imputation with the median (for continuous variables) or the mode (for categorical variables) of non-missing observations, collected in each of the cases and referents strata respectively. If ≥ 5% of cases or ≥ 5% of referents had a missing value for a categorical variable, a ‘missing’ classification was reported as a separate category of the covariate. This was the case for the variables “family history of autoimmune diseases” and “region of residence”. This level of missingness was not observed for any quantitative variable.

In view of the matching of referents to CD cases on age, sex, index date and region of residence, conditional logistic regression was used to assess potential associations of vaccination (all vaccines and for each vaccine separately) with CD, for (1) all CD, (2) optic neuritis and (3) myelitis. The following potential confounders of the relation between the exposure to vaccines and the risk of CD, defined based on prior knowledge and clinical experience, were adjusted for in order to obtain adjusted matched odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI): family history of auto-immune disorders, region of residence, smoking status and co-vaccinations.

For all statistical tests, significance was assessed with respect to the two-sided 0.05 level. Models were also

stratified by age groups (< 25 years old, 25–44 years old, ≥ 45 years old).

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

## Ethics committee approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Paris-Ile de France III (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France III) and data collection was approved by the French data protection authority (“Comission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés”; CNIL). All participants or their parents (if aged < 18 years) gave their written informed consent. Physicians, but not patients, were compensated for inviting and recruiting patients.

## Results

### Study population

Amongst the 694 incident CD cases identified in the systematic PGRx-Demy registry and 15 690 referents in the PGRx-GP registry, 598 CD cases and 13,562 referents met inclusion criteria for this study. Moreover, 564 CD cases were matched to 1128 randomly selected referent patients without a history of demyelination on age, sex, index date (first sign in cases) and region of residence (Northern or Southern France) (Fig. 1). The CD cases seemed to be more likely to have a family history of auto-immune diseases, to be smokers and alcohol drinkers than the referents (Table 1).

### Vaccines and the risk of central demyelination

Overall, 123 (22%) cases and 320 (28%) referents had received at least one vaccine within the 24 months before the index date. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 0.69; 95%CI [0.54–0.88] for any CD first sign, 0.68; 95%CI [0.51–0.90] for myelitis and 0.70; 95%CI [0.42–1.17] for optic neuritis. The adjusted ORs for the other time windows (6 months and 2 months) were very similar to those of the 24-month time window (Table 2). According to vaccine type, adjusted ORs for any CD were 0.39; 95%CI [0.16–0.94] for anti-hepatitis B vaccine, 0.32; 95%CI [0.13–0.80] for anti-HPV vaccine, 1.02; 95%CI [0.71–1.47] for influenza vaccine and 0.72; 95%CI [0.53–0.99] for DTPPHae vaccine in time windows of 24 months. Similar results were observed for the 6-month and 2-month time windows when it was possible to estimate the adjusted ORs in a reliable manner (e.g. adjusted ORs were not estimated if there were fewer than 3 patients in any exposure by disease status cell) (Fig. 2). When 2-month and 6-month time windows were used, a positive non-significant association was found between the influenza vaccine and the risk of CD (OR = 1.55; 95% CI
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Flow chart of patients’ recruitment in the central demyelination and general practice registries</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1** Characteristics and distribution of risk factors in cases and matched referents</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Cases<br>N = 564<br>n (%)</th><th>Matched referents<br>N = 1128<br>n (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Familial history of AID (excluding T1D)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>3 (0.5%)</td><td>1 (0.1%)</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>561 (99.5%)</td><td>1127 (99.9%)</td></tr><tr><td>Region of residence</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Northern or Southern France</td><td>347 (61.5%)</td><td>740 (65.6%)</td></tr><tr><td>Others, mixed or missing</td><td>217 (38.5%)</td><td>388 (34.4%)</td></tr><tr><td>Smoking status</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Smoker</td><td>249 (44.7%)</td><td>462 (41.3%)</td></tr><tr><td>Former smoker (has stopped smoking for ≥ 1 year)</td><td>94 (16.9%)</td><td>164 (14.6%)</td></tr><tr><td>Never smoked</td><td>214 (38.4%)</td><td>493 (44.1%)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing/Chose not to answer</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Alcohol consumption (in a normal week before ID)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Daily or almost daily</td><td>33 (5.9%)</td><td>52 (4.7%)</td></tr><tr><td>A few times per week</td><td>74 (13.3%)</td><td>150 (13.4%)</td></tr><tr><td>Occasionally or never</td><td>450 (80.8%)</td><td>916 (81.9%)</td></tr><tr><td>Missing/chose not to answer</td><td>7</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>Co-vaccinations</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Certain</td><td>123 (21.8%)</td><td>320 (28.4%)</td></tr><tr><td>Uncertain</td><td>10 (1.8%)</td><td>43 (3.8%)</td></tr><tr><td>Not exposed</td><td>431 (76.4%)</td><td>765 (67.8%)</td></tr></tbody></table>

AID autoimmune disease; ID index date; T1D type 1 diabetes
<table><caption>**Table 2** Association between any vaccine and central demyelination, optic neuritis or myelitis before their first signs</caption><thead><tr><th>Any vaccine</th><th>Cases n (%)</th><th>Matched referents n (%)</th><th>Matched adjusted OR [95% CI]<sup>a</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Central demyelination</td><td>n = 564</td><td>n = 1,128</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vaccine within: 24 months before ID</td><td>123 (21.8%)</td><td>320 (28.4%)</td><td>0.69 [0.54–0.88]</td></tr><tr><td>6 months before ID</td><td>52 (9.2%)</td><td>136 (12.1%)</td><td>0.78 [0.55–1.11]</td></tr><tr><td>2 months before ID</td><td>19 (3.4%)</td><td>52 (4.6%)</td><td>0.74 [0.43–1.28]</td></tr><tr><td>Optic neuritis</td><td>n = 132</td><td>n = 264</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vaccine within: 24 months before ID</td><td>27 (20.5%)</td><td>68 (25.8%)</td><td>0.70 [0.42–1.17]</td></tr><tr><td>6 months before ID</td><td>12 (9.1%)</td><td>26 (9.8%)</td><td>1.00 [0.48–2.07]</td></tr><tr><td>2 months before ID</td><td>4 (3.0%)</td><td>11 (4.2%)</td><td>0.82 [0.25–2.67]</td></tr><tr><td>Myelitis</td><td>n = 432</td><td>n = 864</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vaccine within: 24 months before ID</td><td>96 (22.2%)</td><td>252 (29.2%)</td><td>0.68 [0.51–0.90]</td></tr><tr><td>6 months before ID</td><td>40 (9.3%)</td><td>110 (12.7%)</td><td>0.74 [0.50–1.10]</td></tr><tr><td>2 months before ID</td><td>15 (3.5%)</td><td>41 (4.7%)</td><td>0.74 [0.40–1.37]</td></tr></tbody></table>

CI confidence interval; ID index date

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

*Adjusted OR were computed from conditional logistic regression controlled for potential confounding factors: family history of autoimmune diseases, region of residence, smoking status and co-vaccinations

Abbreviations: CD: Central demyelination; CI: confidence interval; DTPPHae: Vaccine against diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-poliomyelitis haemophilus; FLU: Vaccine against Influenza; HBV: Hepatitis B vaccine; HPV: Vaccine against human papilloma virus; ID: Index date.

Odds Ratios not provided if less than 3 patients in any exposure by disease status cell.

<caption>**Fig. 2** Association between vaccines and central demyelination, before its first sign according to type of vaccine</caption>

[0.66–3.64] and OR=1.11; 95%CI [0.64 – 1.91], respectively). The stratification by age groups yielded similar trends (Supplementary Materials, Table S1).

Discussion

A national observational case-referent study was conducted to assess the association between vaccination and CD, considering at risk periods before CD first signs. Our results

showed no increase in the risk of developing CD with vaccination overall (all CD) or according to the type of CD sign (optic neuritis or myelitis), for all vaccines overall or separately (influenza, anti-HPV, DTPPHae and anti-hepatitis B vaccines) and whatever the time window considered (24-, 6- and 2-month windows). However, no conclusion could be drawn for anti-hepatitis B vaccine for the 2-month time window and HPV vaccine for the 6-month and 2-month time windows, as fewer than 3 cases or 3 referents were exposed. Results were overall very similar in the subgroup analysis

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Adjusted OR were computed from conditional logistic regression controlled for family history of autoimmune diseases, region of residence, smoking status and co-vaccinations</footnote>
by age group, results reflecting the different vaccines used
according to age.

The results of the present study are consistent with the
recent findings from several publications [24, 29, 37–41]
which showed that none of the following vaccines, namely
influenza, HPV, DTPPHae and hepatitis B were associated
with an increased risk of CD.

To our knowledge, our study is the largest case-referent
study exploring the relation between vaccination and the
onset of first CD signs taking into consideration the type of
symptom (optic neuritis and/or myelitis) available.

Some findings of our study deserve to further discussion. First, although the association between the influenza vaccine and the risk of CD was not statistically significant, this is the only vaccine yielding OR point estimates above 1 (1.02; 95%CI [0.71–1.47], 1.11; 95%CI [0.64–1.91] and 1.55; 95%CI [0.66–3.64] for 24-, 6-, and 2-month time windows respectively). This was consistent with findings from two other case-control studies that also reported a positive, but not significant, association between the influenza vaccine and the risk of demyelination (i.e. point estimate for multiple sclerosis of 1.6; 95%CI [0.7–3.3] [42] and point estimate for optic neuritis of 1.2; 95%CI [0.60 – 2.3] [27]) whilst also finding point estimates less than 1 for the other types of vaccine. Of note, the adjusted OR for flu vaccine and MS was 0.67 [0.29–1.54] in the persons 45 years old or older, that is the age group with the highest use of this vaccine, systematically recommended and reimbursed from 60 years old and above in the country.

Residual confounding cannot be ruled out to explain find-
ings on the influenza vaccine, as patients are more likely to
get vaccinated against the influenza seasonally, when the
virus is circulating. As no information on influenza occur-
rence was collected, the slight CD risk increase observed
could be linked either to the seasonal vaccine or to the virus
itself circulating at the same time which is known to increase
CD risk. Indeed, in another context, researchers have studied
together the seasonality, the circulating virus and the influ-
enza vaccination, and showed that the positive association
observed is linked to the circulating virus rather than the
influenza vaccine itself [43]. Three other studies confirmed
this observation, with larger samples [44–46].

Second, regarding anti-HPV vaccine, it seems to
have a protective effect against CD (OR = 0.32; 95%CI
[0.13–0.81]), as previously observed in three studies
[47–49]. A potential explanation of this finding could be
the doubts raised by previous case series reports [50–52]
amongst physicians preventing prescription of anti-HPV
vaccination, when there was a family history of auto-
immune disease. This could have led to a ‘pre-depletion’ of
susceptible patients, explaining an artificial protective effect
of the anti-HPV vaccine against CD. A protective effect of
anti-HPV vaccine against CD occurrence cannot however

be ruled out, and other investigations could be carried out
to further explore this association. The same reasoning can
be held for anti-hepatitis B vaccination (potential protective
effect given OR = 0.39; 95%CI [0.16–0.94]).

One of the strengths of this study is the very high speci-
ficity of CD diagnosis using the PGRx information system.
Cases were recruited and reported by expert neurological
centres, spread all over the country. A second strength is
the attention paid to the accurate identification of the date
of CD first signs, which plays a key role in determining the
exposure-occurrence relationship and avoiding reverse cau-
sality bias. Indeed, the recruiting neurologist and the inter-
viewer had to document the date of first signs through a
thorough interview with case patients; they were notably
asked for the date of the first signs that led the patient to a
consultation with a GP, an ophthalmologist or a neurologist
before being referred to the expert centre. A third strength is
that the information regarding main exposure and potential
risk factors was obtained through a validated and structured
standardized telephone interview, administered by trained
staff, blinded to the case/referent status. Vaccination sta-
tus was obtained from patient reports and medical records
with high level of agreement between these two sources
of information in cases and referents. Indeed, agreement
within 3 years before the recruitment date was comprised
between substantial for influenza vaccines (prevalence and
bias-adjusted kappa [PABAK]=0.74) to high for 23-valent
pneumococcal vaccines (PABAK=0.98) and HPV vaccines
(PABAK=0.92) [35]. A fourth strength lies in the PGRx
information system itself, as it is built to minimize selection
bias. Indeed, all participants were first recruited in prospec-
tive CD diseases registries and their exposure was assessed
without any reference to future studies based on these data
such as the current study. Thus, participating physicians and
patients were blinded to specific hypotheses regarding vac-
cination. Fifth, confounding was controlled for key factors
both through matching (age, sex, index date and region of
residence) and adjustment (family history of auto-immune
diseases, region of residence, smoking status and co-vac-
cinations) so that residual confounding seems unlikely.
Finally, in general, referent pools such as that used in this
study (PGRx-GP) have been shown to be representative of
the general population [53].

Our results should be interpreted in the light of some
limitations. First, there was insufficient power to conclude
on individual vaccines in the 2-month time window of
exposure. Indeed, secondary analysis of each individual
vaccine showed a low proportion of CD cases to anti-hep-
atitis B and anti-HPV vaccines, which have been at the
centre of controversies on their alleged risk. The public
attitude towards vaccination has a great impact on vac-
cination rates as illustrated by the drop in anti-hepatitis B
vaccine coverage following an initial report of a temporal
association between the vaccine and multiple sclerosis onset [54], later followed by a series of negative studies [55, 56]. Second, recall bias cannot be ruled out as information on co-medication, co-vaccination and other potential risk factors was collected through telephone interviewing of participants, going back 24 months earlier. Specifically, differential recall bias (i.e. cases, because of illness, tended to report a more comprehensive exposure than referents) could not be excluded even if it is very unlikely due to efforts to minimize this potential bias using PGRx registries [35].

## Conclusion

No increased risk of CD was observed amongst vaccinated patients. Lower rates of vaccination against HBV and HPV were observed in CD patients compared to referents, which may be due to the reluctance of physicians to vaccinate patients considered at risk of demyelination (family history of auto-immune diseases).

**Supplementary Information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11822-y.

**Acknowledgements** The authors acknowledge Médéa Locquet for the manuscript revision and the PGRx-MS Study Group for their precious involvement in recruiting patients.

**Author contributions** Each author was involved in all stages of this work (protocol, study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results). LG-B drafted the manuscript and all authors have read, revised and approved the final version.

**Funding** The present study was funded by the LA-SER Group and the Centre for Risk Research Inc. (Research Tax Credits). The collection of data from clinical centres, patient interviews, statistical analysis and report writing were all conducted independently of any pharmaceutical funding.

**Data availability** Source data may be shared under reasonable request.

## Declarations

**Conflicts of interest** LG-B was the recipient of a research fellowship from INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) at the time of the study and was employed by LA-SER, the company conducting the study. CP is a member of the board for Bayer Schering Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Sanofi-Genzyme Bio Ventures; she has also received payment for lectures and participation in speakers’ bureaus from Bayer Schering Pharma, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Merck Serono SA, Biogen Idec and Genzyme. YH was employed by LA-SER, the company conducting the study. JB was a consultant for LA-SER. LA was a stock-holder and chairman of LA-SER and Centre for Risk Research Inc., an independent research organisation that owns and develops the PGRx database. LA-SER and Centre for Risk Research Inc. have no commercial interests in any of the products investigated in this study.

**Ethical standard statement** All steps performed in our study (data collection and interviews) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee, with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and with the national data protection office requirements.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

1. Mayo L, Quintana FJ, Weiner HL (2012) The innate immune system in demyelinating disease. Immunol Rev 248:170–187

2. Kale N (2016) Optic neuritis as an early sign of multiple sclerosis. Eye Brain 8:195

3. Sestili C, Grazina I, la Torre G (2021) HBV vaccine and risk of developing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccines Immunother 17:2273–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/2164551520181528835

4. Weiner HL (2009) The challenge of multiple sclerosis: how do we cure a chronic heterogeneous disease? Ann Neurol 65:239–248

5. Belbasis L, Bellou V, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JPA, Tzoulaki I (2015) Environmental risk factors and multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet Neurol 14:263–273

6. Ramagopalan SV, Dobson R, Meier UC, Giovannoni G (2010) Multiple sclerosis: risk factors, prodromes, and potential causal pathways. Lancet Neurol 9:727–739

7. Milo R, Kahana E (2010) Multiple sclerosis: geoepidemiology, genetics and the environment. Autoimmun Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTREV.2009.11.010

8. Baranzini SE, Mudge J, van Velkinburgh JC et al (2010) Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature 464:1351–1356

9. Ghareghani M, Reiter RJ, Zibara K, Farhadi N (2018) Latitude, vitamin D, melatonin, and gut microbiota act in concert to initiate multiple sclerosis: a new mechanistic pathway. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FIMMU.2018.02484

10. Simpson S, Wang W, Otahal P, Blizzard L, van der Mei IAF, Taylor BV (2019) Latitude continues to be significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: an updated meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 90:1193–1200

11. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Souberbielle JC (2017) Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis: an update. Mult Scler Relat Disord 14:35–45

12. Salzer J, Hallmans G, Nyström M, Stenlund H, Wadell G, Sundström P (2012) Vitamin D as a protective factor in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 79:2140–2145

13. Carlens C, Hergens MP, Grunewald J et al (2010) Smoking, use of moist snuff, and risk of chronic inflammatory diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:1217–1222

14. Hedström AK, Olsson T, Alfredsson L (2016) Smoking is a major preventable risk factor for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22:1021–1026
15. Hernán MA, Jick SS, Logroscino G, Olek MJ, Ascherio A, Jick H (2005) Cigarette smoking and the progression of multiple sclerosis. Brain 128:1461–1465

16. Ascherio A, Munger KL (2007) Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: the role of infection. Ann Neurol 61:288–299

17. Bjornevik K, Cortese M, Healy BC et al (2022) Longitudinal analysis reveals high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus associated with multiple sclerosis. Science 375:296–301

18. Shoenfeld Y, Aron-Maar A (2000) Vaccination and autoimmunity ‘Vaccinosis’: a dangerous liaison? J Autoimmun 14:1–10

19. Chen RT, Pless R, Destefano F (2001) Epidemiology of autoimmune reactions induced by vaccination. J Autoimmun 16:309–318

20. Piaggio E, ben Younes A, Desbois S et al (2005) Hepatitis B vaccination and central nervous system demyelination: an immunological approach. J Autoimmun 24:33–37

21. Maya R, Gershwin ME, Shoenfeld Y (2008) Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and autoimmune disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 34:85–102

22. Fourrier A, Bégaud B, Alpérovitch A et al (2001) Hepatitis B vaccine and first episodes of central nervous system demyelinating disorders: a comparison between reported and expected number of cases. Br J Clin Pharmacol 51:489–490

23. Vaccination anti hépatite B : MISE A JOUR DES DONNEES ET DES ETUDES DE PHARMACOVIGILANCE-ANSM : Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé. 2022. https://archiveansm.integra.fr/S-informer/Communiques-Communiques-Points-presse/Vaccination-anti-hepatite-B-MISE-A-JOUR-DES-DONNEES-ET-DES-ETUDES-DE-PHARMACOVIGILANCE. Accessed 16 Nov 2022

24. Mailand MT, Frederiksen JL (2017) Vaccines and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. J Neurol 264:1035–1050

25. Mouchet J, Salvo F, Raschi E et al (2018) Hepatitis B vaccination and the putative risk of central demyelinating diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 36:1548–1555

26. Touzé E, Fourrier A, Rue-Fenouche C et al (2002) Hepatitis B vaccination and first central nervous system demyelinating event: a case-control study. Neuroepidemiology 21:180–186

27. DeStefano F, Verstraeten T, Jackson LA et al (2003) Vaccinations and risk of central nervous system demyelinating diseases in adults. Arch Neurol 60:504–509

28. Mikaeloff Y, Caridade G, Suissa S, Tardieu M (2009) Hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of CNS inflammatory demyelination in childhood. Neurology 72:873–880

29. Langer-Gould A, Qian L, Tartof SY et al (2014) Vaccines and the risk of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system demyelinating diseases. JAMA Neurol 71:1506–1513

30. Miranda S, Chaignot C, Collin C, Dray-Spira R, Weill A, Zureik M (2017) Human papillomavirus vaccination and risk of autoimmune diseases: a large cohort study of over 2million young girls in France. Vaccine 35:4761–4768

31. Hernán MA, Jick SS, Olek MJ, Jick H (2004) Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective study. Neurology 63:838–842

32. Geier DA, Geier MR (2005) A case-control study of serious autoimmune adverse events following hepatitis B immunization. Autoimmunity 38:295–301

33. STROBE-Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. 2023. https://www.strobe-statement.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2023

34. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the ‘McDonald Criteria.’ Ann Neurol 58:840–846

35. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Aubrun E, Leighton P, Benichou J, Rossignol M, Abenhaim L (2013) Agreement between patients’ self-report and medical records for vaccination: the PGRx database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 22:278–285

36. Lamiae GB, Michel R, Elodie A, Nabil EK, Jacques B, Lucien A (2010) Agreement between patients’ self-report and physicians’ prescriptions on cardiovascular drug exposure: the PGRx database experience. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 19:591–595

37. Farez MF, Correale J (2011) Immunizations and risk of multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 258:1197–1206

38. Frederiksen JL, Topsøe MM (2017) Vaccines and multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 136(Suppl 201):49–51

39. Liu EY, Smith LM, Ellis AK et al (2018) Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in girls and the risk of autoimmune disorders: the Ontario Grade 8 HPV Vaccine Cohort Study. CMAJ 190:E648–E655

40. Zipp F, Weil JG, Einhaupl KM (1999) No increase in demyelinating diseases after hepatitis B vaccination. Nat Med 5:964–965

41. Winkelmann A, Loebermann M, Barnett M, Hartung HP, Zettl UK (2022) Vaccination and immunotherapies in neuroimmunological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol 18:289–306

42. Zorzon M, Zivadinov R, Nasuelli D et al (2003) Risk factors of multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neurol Sci 24:242–247

43. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Alpérovitch A, Besson G et al (2011) Guillain-Barre syndrome, influenzalike illnesses, and influenza vaccination during seasons with and without circulating A/H1N1 viruses. Am J Epidemiol 174:326–335

44. Greene SK, Rett M, Weintraub ES et al (2012) Risk of confirmed Guillain-Barre syndrome following receipt of monovalent inactivated influenza A (H1N1) and seasonal influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, 2009–2010. Am J Epidemiol 175:1100–1109

45. Prestel J, Volkers P, Mentzer D, Lehmann HC, Hartung HP, Keller-Stanislawski B (2014) Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 vaccination in Germany. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 23:1192

46. Vellozzi C, Iqbal S, Stewart B, Tokars J, DeStefano F (2014) Cumulative risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Public Health 104:696

47. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Rossignol M, Koné-Paut I et al (2017) Risk of autoimmune diseases and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines: six years of case-referent surveillance. J Autoimmun 79:84–90

48. Gee J, Naleway A, Shui I et al (2011) Monitoring the safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: findings from the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine 29:8279–8284

49. Arnheim-Dahlström L, Pasternak B, Svanström H, Sparén P, Hviid A (2013) Autoimmune, neurological, and venous thromboembolic adverse events after immunisation of adolescent girls with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in Denmark and Sweden: cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.F5906

50. Josefa Álvarez-Soria M, Hernández-González A, de León SCG, Ángeles del Real-Francia M, José Gallardo-Alcañiz M, López-Gómez JL (2011) Demyelinating disease and vaccination of the human papillomavirus. Rev Neurol 52:472–476

51. Sutton I, Lahoria R, Tan IL, Clouston P, Barnett MH (2009) CNS demyelination and quadrivalent HPV vaccination. Mult Scler 15:116–119

52. Karussis D, Petrou P (2014) The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmun Rev 13:215–224
53. Les consultations et visites des médecins généralistes-Un essai de typologie | Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques. 2022. https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/publi cations/etudes-et-resultats/les-consultations-et-visites-des-medec ins-generalistes-un-essai-de. Accessed 16 Nov 2022

54. Herroelen L, de Keyser J, Ebinger G (1991) Central-nervous-system demyelination after immunisation with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Lancet 338:1174–1175

55. Denis F, Levy-Bruhl D (2006) Mass vaccination against hepatitis B: the French example. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 304:115–129

56. Martínez-Sernández V, Figueiras A (2013) Central nervous system demyelinating diseases and recombinant hepatitis B vaccination:

a critical systematic review of scientific production. J Neurol 260:1951–1959