# Exploring the interaction and impact of probiotic and commensal bacteria on vitamins, minerals and short chain fatty acids metabolism

Luis Bermúdez-Humarán, Benoit Chassaing, Philippe Langella

► To cite this version:

Luis Bermúdez-Humarán, Benoit Chassaing, Philippe Langella. Exploring the interaction and impact of probiotic and commensal bacteria on vitamins, minerals and short chain fatty acids metabolism. Microbial Cell Factories, 2024, 23 (1), pp.172. 10.1186/s12934-024-02449-3. pasteur-05265374

HAL Id: pasteur-05265374

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-05265374v1

Submitted on 17 Sep 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Exploring the interaction and impact of probiotic and commensal bacteria on vitamins, minerals and short chain fatty acids metabolism

Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán¹*, Benoit Chassaing²,³ and Philippe Langella¹*

**Abstract**

There is increasing evidence that probiotic and commensal bacteria play a role in substrate metabolism, energy harvesting and intestinal homeostasis, and may exert immunomodulatory activities on human health. In addition, recent research suggests that these microorganisms interact with vitamins and minerals, promoting intestinal and metabolic well-being while producing vital microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). In this regard, there is a flourishing field exploring the intricate dynamics between vitamins, minerals, SCFAs, and commensal/probiotic interactions. In this review, we summarize some of the major hypotheses beyond the mechanisms by which commensals/probiotics impact gut health and their additional effects on the absorption and metabolism of vitamins, minerals, and SCFAs. Our analysis includes comprehensive review of existing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies, with particular focus on the potential interaction between commensals/probiotics and micronutrients. Finally, we highlight knowledge gaps and outline directions for future research in this evolving field.

**Keywords** Probiotics, Vitamins, Minerals, Energy metabolism, Immunity, Gut health, Synergy

**Introduction**

Probiotics are defined as "live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host" [1, 2]. The "adequate amount" of a probiotic is strain-dependent and is broadly defined as the quantity proven to provide a health benefit in human clinical trials [3]. Probiotic bacteria exert multiple effects on the intestinal environment, although precise mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood [4, 5]. Thus, probiotics play a key role in substrate metabolization, food digestion and energy recovery [5]. Probiotics also contribute to epithelial barrier integrity through their ability to restore intestinal permeability and decrease inflammation (Fig. 1) [6]. However, not all probiotics

*Correspondence:
Luis G. Bermúdez-Humarán
luis.bermudez@inrae.fr
Philippe Langella
philippe.langella@inrae.fr

¹Laboratory of Commensals and Probiotics-Host Interactions, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, AgroParisTech 78350, France

²Microbiome-Host Interactions, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1306, Paris, France

³INSERM U1016, team Mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases, CNRS UMR 8104, Université de Paris, Paris, France

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

BMC

© The Author(s) 2024. **Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Main probiotics mechanisms of actions. This figure was created with Biorender.com and reproduced with permission from Bermúdez-Brito et al. [134]</figcaption></figure>

display similar properties, and these effects appear bacte-
rial-strain specific [7, 8].

In healthy individuals, the intestinal microbiota and the host immune system exist in a state of homeostasis. This homeostasis can be disrupted, leading to a dysbiotic gut microbiota, which has been observed in many human diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), obesity, type 2 diabetes, and several types of cancers [9, 10]. In addition, recent data suggest a link between gut microbiota bioenergetics and chronic metabolic diseases, with a deficit of shared energetic resources in the dysbiotic microbiota of patients [11]. Furthermore, a causal correlation between gut bacteria and disease onset (or, conversely, disease protection) has been established at the molecular level [10].

The use of probiotics has demonstrated its beneficial potential beyond a simple modulation of the intestinal microbiota composition. Indeed, probiotics have shown promise in the treatment and management of various diseases. For example, in gastrointestinal disorders such as IBD and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), they improve the diversity of the gut microbiota, strengthen intestinal barrier, modulate immune responses and produce antimicrobial substances [12, 13]. In metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, probiotics improve energy metabolism and insulin sensitivity [14], and reduce inflammation through the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [15]. In allergic conditions such as eczema and allergic rhinitis, they regulate the immune response and promote a healthy gut microbiota to reduce

allergic reactions [16]. Probiotics also help prevent uro-
genital infections, such as bacterial vaginosis and uri-
nary tract infections, by competing with pathogens and
producing antimicrobial compounds [17]. New research
suggests that probiotics may have a positive impact on
mental health by influencing the gut-brain axis and stress
response mechanisms. In addition, in skin disorders
such as acne and psoriasis, probiotics reduce inflamma-
tion and balance the skin microbiota [18]. These diverse
functions highlight the therapeutic potential of probiot-
ics to maintain and restore health in a variety of medical
settings.

For instance, beneficial effects of selected strains of *Lactobacillus* and *Bifidobacterium*, the best documented traditional probiotic bacterial genera to date, have been reported both in vitro and in preclinical and clinical trials [7, 19]. Besides, scientific advances in genome sequencing techniques and culture methods have allowed the isolation and characterization of commensal bacterial strains such as *Faecalibacterium prausnitzii*, *Christensenella minuta* and *Akkermansia muciniphila*, with potential health benefits and the opportunity to be developed as next-generation probiotics (NGPs) or live biotherapeutics (LBPs) [19, 20]. Most of these NGPs have been identified by comparing the gut microbiota of healthy versus sick individuals [21]. Today, traditional probiotics are used in functional foods and food supplements, whereas NGPs are used as drug products or, more recently, as a novel food in Europe [22, 23]. Apart from commensals, there is a great interest in a second type of NGPs, which
are genetically modified or engineered bacteria, such as *Escherichia coli* Nissle 1917 or lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Over the past decade, the main challenges of using such NGPs, especially related to their delivery and consumption, have been circumvented [24].

Understanding mechanisms underlying probiotic effects within the human gut may contribute to a rational selection of probiotic strains in both healthy and sick individuals [9]. In this context, food-grade microorganisms, such as lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, may play a key role in modulating host micronutrient status through their ability to synthesize vitamins and increase nutrient (e.g. minerals) absorption in the gut [4, 10, 11, 19]. Furthermore, some bacterial strains produce a range of beneficial molecules such as amino acids, enzymes, and SCFAs [25]. Additionally, probiotics may play a role in modulating host immunometabolism through the production of SCFAs and tryptophan (*trp*) metabolites, among others, which altogether impact intestinal inflammatory status and host metabolic health [26]. Indeed, recent studies have identified key proteins involved in the *trp* metabolic pathway, such as Aryl hydrocarbon Receptors (AhR), as targets for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, inflammation, and malignancies [27]. Of note, the commensal *Limosilactobacillus reuteri* F6 strain has been successfully used to restore AhR activation in mice [28], and novel NGPs are being developed for their ability to activate AhR [27].

Finally, recent data suggest that probiotics may act synergistically with micronutrients (such as vitamins and minerals) to boost intestinal immunity and promote human health. The modes of action involved in such synergy between the triad probiotics–vitamins–minerals are complex and not yet fully elucidated [29]. In this review, we summarize the main hypotheses regarding mechanisms of action of probiotics in the gut and their add-on effects on the bioavailability and metabolism of vitamins and minerals. We assess current evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies and provide clues on the synergistic effects of probiotics and micronutrients, as well as highlighting knowledge gaps and needed future research directions. Briefly, we will describe and discuss i) the activity of probiotics on host energy metabolism, ii) the role of vitamins and minerals in probiotic energy metabolism and finally, iii) the synergistic effects of probiotics, vitamins and minerals on human health.

## Probiotics in host energy metabolism

Humans lack the enzymes needed to break down fermentable fibers, which pass unaffected the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and are fermented in the cecum and large intestine by the gut microbiota [30]. Some particular strains of either probiotics or commensal bacteria have the ability to break down indigestible fibers, leading

to the production of multiple types of beneficial metabolites, of which SCFAs (mainly acetate, propionate and butyrate) are the most abundant [30–33]. These three SCFAs have different tissue distributions and effects on host physiology [34]: (i) acetate produced by colonic bacteria enters the blood compartment, where it is mixed with endogenous acetate released by tissues and organs [30], and (ii) propionate acts as a precursor for gluconeogenesis in the liver [30, 34] and butyrate is preferentially used as an energy source by colonocytes [30, 34, 35]. It is converted into acetyl-CoA, which enters the cellular Krebs cycle to provide energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [36, 37].

SCFAs also play a central role in regulating host intestinal health through several mechanisms, such promoting the integrity of the intestinal barrier and preventing leaky gut syndrome [38]. SCFAs also have anti-inflammatory properties and regulate the immune response by modulating cytokine production [39]. They influence intestinal motility by stimulating hormones such as peptide YY (PYY) and GLP-1, and help maintain a balanced intestinal microbiota [40]. In addition, SCFAs increase mucin production, potentially reinforcing the protective mucous layer of the intestine. Through epigenetic regulation as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, SCFAs affect gene expression and cellular processes [41]. They also interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), influencing physiological functions such as immune response and hormone release [42]. These multifaceted actions make SCFAs crucial for intestinal and overall health.

Therefore, probiotic bacteria have emerged as an attractive alternative to modulate host energy balance through their role in SCFAs production [43]. While SCFAs are produced primarily for bacterial needs, they can also cross the intestinal epithelium and be used by the host as a nutrient source [44]. Moreover, probiotic metabolites, including SCFA, act as signaling molecules that impact energy uptake, storage and expenditure, as well as appetite [43]. Additionally, there is a well-established crosstalk between the gut microbiota and the brain (i.e. gut-brain axis), mediated by SCFAs and other metabolites [45, 46]. This crosstalk helps to regulate nutrient signaling and maintain energy homeostasis, and its dysfunction may contribute to obesity [47].

## Vitamins and minerals as key actors in host energy metabolism modulation by probiotics

While the intestinal microbiota plays a pivotal role in food digestion and energy recovery, it can also produce and supply vitamins to its host [5, 48–51]. Selected probiotics may thus optimize vitamins and minerals absorption in the gut through a number of different mechanisms including: (i) lowering pH through increased production
of intraluminal lactic acid, (ii) modulating hormone levels, (iii) beneficial alterations of the gut microbiota, and (iv) inhibiting pathogenic bacteria adhesion to the surface of intestinal epithelial cells, thereby reducing competition for available nutrients (Fig. 2) [29].

B vitamins are water-soluble vitamins required as cofactors for enzymes that catalyze cleavage of energy from nutrients to form ATP [5, 49]. Food-related LAB, as well as human gut commensals, can synthesize de novo and supply most B-vitamins, e.g. folates (B9), riboflavin (B2), cobalamin (vitamin B12), thiamine (B1) and pyridoxine (B6) [5, 52, 53]. The genes responsible for vitamin biosynthesis in LAB have been identified in several species [54]. For example, cobalamin has been found to be produced by different strains of *Lactobacillus reuteri* [55]. Vitamin production by LAB varies significantly, as it is a species-specific or strain-dependent trait. However, studies have shown that this property is not bacterial species-specific but rather bacterial strain-specific [56–59]. For instance, some particular strains of LAB or Bifidobacteria have the ability to produce vitamins such as the folate-producing probiotic strains *Bifidobacterium longum* B6 and ATCC 15,708, *Lactobacillus acidophilus* N1 and ATCC 4356, *Lactobacillus delbrueckii* ssp. bulgaricus 448 and 449, and *Streptococcus thermophilus* MC and 573 [60], *Lactobacillus sakei* strains CRL 2209 and CRL 2210 [61] and *Bifidobacterium catenulatum* ATCC 27,539 [62]. Also, a study evaluating the in vitro potential of four probiotic bacterial strains to produce and release de novo SCFAs and selected B-vitamins found that *B. longum* SP 07/3 and *B. bifidum* MF 20/5 were able to synthetize in vitro thiamine but unable to synthesize folates or riboflavin [52]. The two bifidobacterial strains, together with *Lactobacillus gasseri* PA 16/8, were also able to produce propionate and acetate. The same study

suggested that SCFAs- and vitamin B-producing bacteria can optimize ATP production in hosts [52].

It has been hypothesized that, if a bacterial strain is able to synthesize vitamins within the gut, it may thus increase the total vitamins content of the host [48]. Indeed, the ability of selected bacterial strains to boost vitamins absorption has been shown in pre-clinical and clinical studies. For instance, *Bifidobacterium adolescentis* MB 239 was found to increase folate levels [63], while vitamins-producing LAB improved both folate [64] and riboflavin status in vitamins-deficient animals [65, 66]. Moreover, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 46 obese patients undergoing gastric bypass, it was observed that probiotic supplementation with 7 bacterial strains (*Lacticaseibacillus casei*, *L. rhamnosus*, *Lactobacillus acidophilus*, *Lactobacillus bulgaricus*, *Streptococcus thermophilus*, *Bifidobacterium breve* and *B. longum*) plus prebiotic (fructo-oligosaccharides [FOS]) improved vitamin D3 and B12 levels at month 4 compared to placebo [67]. Prebiotic has been defined as a substrate that is selectively used by host micro-organisms conferring a health benefit [68]). Interestingly, these effects were transient and did not persist at 9-months follow-up, suggesting that long-term probiotic supplementation should be considered [67]. Another randomized trial demonstrated that daily intake of a probiotic capsule containing 2.4 billion of *L. acidophilus* La-14 significantly increased vitamin B12 levels in morbidly obese patients compared to the control group [69].

More recently, a synergy between vitamin D3 and *L. rhamnosus* GG was shown to protect mice from colitis [70] through the promotion of Vitamin D Receptor expression and epithelial cells proliferation. This preclinical study shows that vitamin D3 could synergize with the

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Proposed mechanisms by which probiotics optimize the intestinal environment for better nutrient absorption. This figure was created with BioRender.com (Based on the text in Barkhidarian et al. [29])</figcaption></figure>
probiotic strain *L. rhamnosus* GG, providing therapeutic potential in IBD.

Moreover, in the MetaCardis cohort study, biotin level in relation with the gut microbiota was evaluated in 1,545 obese individuals [71]. This study demonstrated that microbiota can lose the ability to generate biotin in subjects with severe obesity. More importantly, in mice models, supplementing high-fat diet-fed mice with FOS and biotin was found to exert a synergistic effect on microbial diversity, biotin and B-vitamin levels, while limiting weight gain and impaired glycemia [71].

Probiotics supplementation can also increase the concentration of minerals in fermented foods [49] and there is evidence that these microorganisms also play a role in mineral absorption [72]. The use of synbiotics, i.e. combinations of probiotics and prebiotics, has also been shown to have an additional effect on mineral absorption [72]. In this context, a number of studies have evaluated the effect of probiotic administration on mineral absorption [73–77]. Thus, recent work concluded that *Lactobacillus* spp. and *Bifidobacterium* spp. have beneficial effects on the bio-accessibility and bio-availability of major minerals including iron, zinc, magnesium, calcium, and selenium [74]. Animal studies found that probiotic supplementation of broiler feeds significantly raised serum calcium and iron levels and improved digestive function and physiological status in chickens [75, 76]. Other studies using prebiotics showed that stimulation of commensal bacterial population levels can increase mineral absorption in animals [78].

In humans, a systematic review of probiotics studies in healthy individuals indicated that probiotic consumption improves calcium levels in pediatric, geriatric and postmenopausal subjects and may facilitate zinc uptake in children. However, results regarding iron absorption were less congruent [29]. While some clinical trials focusing on the effect of probiotic supplementation on zinc and iron deficiency showed conflicting results [79], a randomized pilot study of 40 pediatric patients demonstrated that a selected combination of *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum*, *L. acidophilus*, *Bifidobacterium infantis* and *Bifidobacterium lactis* is effective in increasing the levels of calcium, zinc and iron if administered for at least 5 weeks [80]. In people with type 2 diabetes, supplementation with a mixture of 7 probiotic strains for 8 weeks significantly raised serum calcium concentrations versus placebo in a randomized controlled trial (n=58) [73].

Also, in post-menopausal women, a clinical study demonstrated a positive effect was observed following probiotic supplementation, with beneficial effects on bone metabolism and bone mass density in this population, suggesting that post-menopausal women are potential targets for probiotic supplementation to increase bone mass density [81].

Taken together, these data suggest that, although the exact nature of the connection between probiotics, vitamins and minerals remain to be thoroughly characterized, they harbor a real therapeutic potential.

## Synergistic effects of probiotics, vitamins and minerals on human health

Accumulating evidence suggest that probiotics act synergistically with micronutrients (i.e. vitamins and minerals) to support intestinal immunity and promote human health [29]. It is now well established that the intestinal microbiota plays a major role in promoting and maintaining gut health [4, 10, 11, 19]. The available data suggest that, by restoring the composition of the human gut microbiota, probiotics exert multiple effects on host immunity [82]. Thus, interest in the immunomodulatory effects of probiotic bacteria and their therapeutic ability has increased considerably over the last decade [19, 83]. For example, probiotics improve intestinal health by competing with harmful pathogens for nutrients and attachment sites, reducing the growth of pathogens [84]. They produce antimicrobial substances such as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide and antimicrobial peptides, which inhibit harmful bacteria [85, 86]. Probiotics also modulate immune responses by stimulating antibody production [87], and activating immune cells, which promotes a balanced immune system [84]. In addition, they improve intestinal barrier function by inducing mucus production [88] and regulating the expression of tight junction proteins [88], reducing permeability and preventing harmful bacteria and toxins from entering the bloodstream. All these are important actors for gut health and proper host-microbiota interaction and balance (Fig. 3).

Some studies highlighted the immunomodulatory potential of SCFAs through their action on G-protein coupled receptors, which coordinate signaling pathways and regulate gene expression in immune cells [89], as well as on intestinal T-cells, where SCFA-derived acetyl groups influence cytokine gene expression [90]. Based on these findings, a role has emerged for SCFAs as therapeutic targets in various autoimmune diseases [90]. Moreover, research on gut immunometabolism has demonstrated that probiotics can induce either pro-inflammatory [83] or anti-inflammatory [91] reactions in their host. Also, recent clinical studies indicated an effect of probiotics on both the innate and adaptive human immune responses, and modulation of antibody production after vaccination against influenza virus [92] or SARS-CoV-2 [93–96], for example.

Vitamins contribute to the normal functioning of the immune system by modulating the production of both pro-and anti-inflammatory molecules, supporting the epithelial barrier, and helping to balance and diversify the intestinal microbiota [97, 98]. Vitamins supplementation
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Proposed mechanisms by which probiotics act synergistically with micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) to stimulate intestinal immunity. This figure was created with Biorender.com</figcaption></figure>

may directly impact gut immune system or it may act indirectly, through the production of microbial metabolites [98]. For example, vitamins A and D modulate the expression of tight junction proteins and stimulate mucosal immune responses [49] and the production of antimicrobial peptides [99, 100]; vitamin B6 and folates improve immune function [101]; vitamin B12 feeds the gut microbiota [102]; while vitamins C and E suppress the formation of reactive oxygen species [103]. There is growing evidence on the importance of the vitamin D pathway for intestinal homeostasis and signaling between gut microbiota and the host [104]. At higher concentrations, vitamin D favors the growth of protective microbiota, whereas low levels lead to a permeable barrier, outgrowth of harmful bacteria and increased inflammation [105].

Currently, fewer data are available on the role of minerals in gut health, but, similarly to vitamins, minerals appear to impact intestinal physiology (Fig. 3) [29, 106]. For instance, supplementation with zinc or iron was found to improve intestinal barrier function [107, 108], while zinc and selenium displayed immunomodulatory

effects [109, 110]. Moreover, magnesium deficiency has been associated with the pro-inflammatory environment underlying the development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, obesity and other metabolic conditions [111].

The interactions between the gut microbiota and micronutrients are bidirectional, i.e. micronutrients impact the composition and function of the microbiota, while the latter affects the bioavailability of vitamins and minerals [79]. Thus, while vitamins help regulate the microbiota-mediated production of metabolites, the reverse can also be true: bacterial strains such as LGG were shown to play a role in vitamin B homeostasis in the gut [52].

The effects of vitamins and probiotics supplementations on immune system have been explored in a range of pre-clinical and clinical studies. One such study, using in vivo and in vitro approaches, found that treatment with either retinol or retinoic acid inhibited norovirus replication by inducing changes in gut microbiota composition in mice [112]. A randomized controlled trial of 479
<table><caption>**Table 1** summarizes some of the main probiotic strains currently known for their impact on gut health and when applicable their additional effects on the absorption and metabolism of vitamins, minerals and SCFA</caption><thead><tr><th>Probiotic strain</th><th>Reported effects on intestinal health and host energy metabolism</th><th>Ref.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG</td><td>Improves intestinal barrier function, modulates immune responses, increases mineral absorption and stimulates butyrate-producing bacterial strains</td><td>[119-121]</td></tr><tr><td>Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12</td><td>Reduces intestinal inflammation, promotes immune function, B vitamins absorption and increases SCFA production</td><td>[122, 123]</td></tr><tr><td>Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5/L. acidophilus DDS-1</td><td>Improves digestion and reduces symptoms of lactose intolerance, improves minerals absorption and increases SCFA production</td><td>[122-124]</td></tr><tr><td>Bifidobacterium longum BB536</td><td>Balances the intestinal microbiota and reduces gastrointestinal discomfort, improves calcium and iron absorption and increases the production of SCFA</td><td>[125, 126]</td></tr><tr><td>Lactobacillus plantarum 299v/L. plantarum 2362</td><td>Reduces intestinal inflammation, improves intestinal barrier function and improves absorption minerals</td><td>[127, 128]</td></tr><tr><td>Bifidobacterium bifidum Bf-688</td><td>Promotes the balance of intestinal microbiota and reduces inflammation, improves the absorption of vitamins and increases the production of SCFA</td><td>[129]</td></tr><tr><td>Lactobacillus salivarius UCC4331</td><td>Improves immune function and reduces IBS symptoms and SCFA production</td><td>[130]</td></tr><tr><td>VSL#3<sup>1</sup> cockatil</td><td>Reduces intestinal inflammation and modulates the immune response and increases SCFA production</td><td>[131, 132]</td></tr></tbody></table>

adult healthy volunteers reported that intake of a probiotic supplement containing *L. gasseri* PA 16/8, *B. longum* SP 07/3 and *B. bifidum* MF 20/5 along with vitamins and minerals for at least 3 months (including 2 winter/ spring periods) significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory tract infections versus placebo by 13.6%, shortened common cold episodes by almost 2 days and reduced symptom severity [113]. Meanwhile, iron supplementation in infants at risk of diarrhea and respiratory tract infections adversely affected the gut microbiota by lowering the abundance of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and increasing the relative proportions of pathogens [114, 115].

Studies have also reported that probiotics and micronutrients can be effective in preventing fatigue and oxidative stress. For instance, in an observational cohort study of 242 subjects complaining of psychological stress (as defined by a Perceived Stress Scale score ≥21), stress and fatigue were significantly reduced by the intake of a food supplement containing *L. gasseri* PA 16/8, *B. bifidum* MF 20/5, *B. longum* SP 07/3, as well as vitamin A, B-group vitamins and magnesium; the effect was maintained one

month after discontinuation [116]. Similarly, co-administration of vitamin D with a probiotic capsule containing *L. acidophilus*, *B. bifidum*, *L. reuteri* and *L. fermentum* over 12 weeks in 60 women with polycystic ovarian syndrome had beneficial effects on mental health (anxiety and depression) while significantly reducing levels of testosterone, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and malondialdehyde [117].

For instance, in a non-randomized clinical trial, participants who consumed a probiotic strain of *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* 299v plus an iron supplement exhibited significantly greater iron absorption in the presence of the probiotic than without it [118].

A systematic review of the literature identified 14 studies with available data on the effect of probiotic supplementation on micronutrient status in healthy humans [29]. Published between 2000 and 2020, these studies were conducted in different geographical regions and had variable designs, with 11 being randomized [29]. While data on the impact of some probiotic strains, such as the symbiotic containing 4 different patented probiotic strains (*L. plantarum*, *L. acidophilus*, *B. infantis* and *B. lactis*, Hyperbiotics PRO-Kids: US patent 8,007,777 and 7,150,623) and a prebiotic (fructo-oligosaccharides, FOS), on the levels of fat-soluble vitamins (A and E) and carotenoids were inconclusive, a potential role emerged for selected strains (including *L. acidophilus* La1 [22] and *B. adolescentis* MB 239 [63]) in improving folate and vitamin B12 status. However, these positive results in healthy individuals need to be validated in larger clinical trials [29].

**Table 1.** Main effects on intestinal health and host energy metabolism of selected probiotic strains.

¹VSL#3= is a commercial probiotic mixture consisting of eight bacterial strains: 4 strains of *Lactobacillus* (*L. acidophilus*, *L. plantarum*, *L. casei*, and *L. delbrueckii* ssp. *bulgaricus*), 3 strains of *Bifidobacterium* (*B. breve*, *B. longum*, and *B. infantis*), and 1 strain of *Streptococcus* (*S. salivarius* ssp. *thermophilus*).

## Concluding remarks and future directions

Probiotic bacteria are promising players in host energy metabolism and gut health through the production of SCFAs, amino acids, vitamins, enzymes, and immunomodulatory compounds, some of which have been shown to display therapeutic potential. Moreover, many probiotics increase energy harvest by producing SCFAs and B-vitamins, which contribute to the cellular Krebs cycle.

Although there is increasing evidence describing the multiple effects of probiotics in the gut, more in vivo studies are needed to evaluate the ability of select probiotic strains to increase energy availability. Furthermore, current knowledges are mostly limited to the healthy general population and are not yet sufficient for formulating
a convincing argument for regulatory bodies such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

Studies are also needed to improve the characterization of probiotics and their mode of action, starting with a single-strain strategy. Indeed, precision probiotics is an attractive alternative to the one-size-fits-all approach and could be used in the future for personalized intervention of probiotic strains to improve several pathologies based on the specific characteristics of each individual [133]. Future research is likely to be highly microbiota-driven; in particular, a promising niche of investigation will be to understand how different strains potentially drive vitamin production. Notably, although most probiotic strains are not able to produce B-vitamins, they could exert an effect on vitamin biosynthesis in the gut, which could be studied using a transcriptomic approach to determine the relative expression of genes involved in their metabolism.

Through their synergistic effects, probiotics and micronutrients play an important role in supporting intestinal immunity; however, the mechanisms involved are complex and still under investigation. The synergy between probiotics, vitamins and minerals is a promising area for further research, and well-designed clinical trials are needed to describe such interactions in situ. A better understanding of the interactions between probiotics, commensals and the host will drive the optimization of probiotic, vitamin and mineral supplementation in healthy individuals as well as in patients. To this end, a multidisciplinary approach involving microbiologists, physiologists, bioinformaticians and physicians appears warranted.

## Methodology

To appraise the existing data on the interplay between probiotics, vitamins and minerals in promoting gut health, three experts in the field were invited to present different aspects on this topic. Presentations were given during a one-day virtual meeting and each presentation was followed by extensive discussions within the panel. The information gathered and group consensus statements were incorporated into the present manuscript, together with a review of the relevant literature in the field, which was next thoroughly reviewed by the topic leaders.

We based our selection of discussed studies through PubMed search using probiotics, vitamins, minerals, micronutrients and clinical trial. This selection was thus performed as described in the ref # 41: *They first identified 2772 abstracts. Removing duplicates (n=320) and screening studies by title and abstract, led to 22 human clinical trials and finally to 14 articles after elimination of articles that did not meet inclusion criteria.*

## Acknowledgements

Medical writing support was provided by Ileana Stoica and Carys Ampofo, funded by P&G Health.

## Author contributions

L.G.B-H, B.C. and P.L. conceived and designed this work, performed data analysis and wrote the original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

## Funding

This manuscript is based on the outcomes of a roundtable meeting held on 02 February 2022. The meeting and the development of this publication are sponsored by P&G Healthcare.

## Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

## Declarations

### Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

### Consent for publication

Not applicable.

### Competing interests

LGBH, BC and PL disclose a financial competing interest as they received fees for consultancy and lectures from P&G.

Received: 16 February 2024 / Accepted: 4 June 2024

Published online: 12 June 2024

## References

1. Hill C, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66.

2. Martin R, Langella P. Emerging Health concepts in the Probiotics Field: streamlining the definitions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1047. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01047.

3. Venema K, et al. Probiotic survival during a multi-layered tablet development as tested in a dynamic, computer-controlled in vitro model of the stomach and small intestine (TIM-1). Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019;69:325-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13211.

4. Khalighi A, et al. Probiotics: a comprehensive review of their classification, mode of action and role in human nutrition. Probiotics Prebiotics Hum Nutr Health. 2016;10:63646.

5. LeBlanc JG, et al. Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: a gut microbiota perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:160-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.005.

6. Martin R, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis CNCM I-2494 restores gut barrier permeability in chronically low-Grade Inflamed mice. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00608.

7. Bubnov RV, et al. Specific properties of probiotic strains: relevance and benefits for the host. EPMA J. 2018;9:205-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-018-0132-z.

8. McFarland LV, et al. Strain-specificity and disease-specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00124.

9. Daliri EB, et al. Probiotic Effector compounds: current knowledge and future perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:655705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.655705.

10. de Vos WM, et al. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789.

11. Daisley BA, et al. Emerging connections between gut microbiome bioenergetics and chronic metabolic diseases. Cell Rep. 2021;37:110087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110087.
12. Derwa Y, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:389–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14203.

13. Ford AC, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:1044–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15001.

14. Kobyliak N, et al. Probiotics in prevention and treatment of obesity: a critical view. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016;13(14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0067-0.

15. Rios-Covian D, et al. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with Diet and Human Health. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00185.

16. Fiocchi A, et al. World Allergy Organization-McMaster University guidelines for allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P): Probiotics. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-015-0055-2.

17. Lopez-Moreno A, Aguilera M. Vaginal Probiotics for Reproductive Health and related dysbiosis: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071461.

18. Bowe WP, Logan AC. Acne Vulgaris, probiotics and the gut-brain-skin axis - back to the future? Gut Pathog. 2011;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-3-1.

19. Cunningham M, et al. Shaping the future of Probiotics and Prebiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:667–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.01.003.

20. Langella P, et al. Editorial: Next-Generation Probiotics: from commensal Bacteria to Novel drugs and Food supplements. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1973. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01973.

21. Bermudez-Humaran LG, Langella P. Live bacterial biotherapeutics in the clinic. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:816–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4248.

22. Plovier H, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat Med. 2017;23:107–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4236.

23. Cani PD, et al. Author correction: Akkermansia muciniphila: paradigm for next-generation beneficial microorganisms. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-022-00650-6.

24. O'Toole PW, et al. Next-generation probiotics: the spectrum from probiotics to live biotherapeutics. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17057. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.57.

25. Indira M, et al. Bioactive molecules of probiotic bacteria and their mechanism of action: a review. 3 Biotech. 2019;9:306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1841-2.

26. Michaudel C, Sokol H. The gut microbiota at the service of immunometabolism. Cell Metab. 2020;32:514–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.004.

27. Modoux M, et al. Tryptophan Metabolism as a pharmacological target. Trends Pharmac Sci. 2021;42:60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2020.11.006.

28. Lamas B, et al. CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat Med. 2016;22:598–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4102.

29. Barkhidarian B, et al. Probiotic supplementation and Micronutrient Status in healthy subjects: a systematic review of clinical trials. Nutrients. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093001.

30. den Besten G, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–40. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R036012.

31. Meimandipour A, et al. Selected microbial groups and short-chain fatty acids profile in a simulated chicken cecum supplemented with two strains of Lactobacillus. Poult Sci. 2010;89:470–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00495.

32. Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00086.

33. Sivieri K, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 1014 improved gut health in the SHIME reactor. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-100.

34. Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082.

35. Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Fermentation in the human large intestine: its physiologic consequences and the potential contribution of prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:120–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822fece.

36. Roediger WE. Utilization of nutrients by isolated epithelial cells of the rat colon. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:424–9.

37. Dunn J, Grider MH. (2022) Physiology, Adenosine Triphosphate. In *StatPearls*.

38. Parada Venegas D, et al. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-Mediated gut epithelial and Immune Regulation and its relevance for inflammatory Bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277.

39. Tedelind S, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of the short-chain fatty acids acetate and propionate: a study with relevance to inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2826–32. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i20.2826.

40. Christiansen CB, et al. The impact of short-chain fatty acids on GLP-1 and PYY secretion from the isolated perfused rat colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;315:G53–65. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00346.2017.

41. Fellows R, et al. Microbiota derived short chain fatty acids promote histone crotonylation in the colon through histone deacetylases. Nat Commun. 2018;9:105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02651-5.

42. Milligan G, et al. Complex pharmacology of free fatty acid receptors. Chem Rev. 2017;117:67–110. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00056.

43. Heiss CN, Olofsson LE. Gut microbiota-dependent modulation of Energy Metabolism. J Innate Immun. 2018;10:163–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000481519.

44. Health H, T.C.S.o.P. (2022) The Microbiome. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/microbiome/ Last accessed March 2022.

45. Dalile B, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota-gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:461–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0157-3.

46. Silva YP, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in Gut-Brain communication. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00025.

47. Romani-Perez M, et al. The Microbiota and the gut-brain Axis in Controlling Food Intake and Energy Homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115830.

48. LeBlanc JG, et al. B-group vitamin production by lactic acid bacteria-current knowledge and potential applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111:1297–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05157.x.

49. Linares DM, et al. Lactic acid Bacteria and bifidobacteria with potential to Design Natural Biofunctional Health-promoting dairy Foods. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00846.

50. Wang Y, et al. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid Bacteria and the Expanding Applications in Food Industry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:612285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.612285.

51. Soto-Martín EC, et al. Vitamin biosynthesis by human gut butyrate-producing Bacteria and cross-feeding in Synthetic Microbial communities. mBio. 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.000886-20.

52. LeBlanc JG, et al. Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0691-z.

53. Resta SC. Effects of probiotics and commensals on intestinal epithelial physiology: implications for nutrient handling. J Physiol. 2009;587:4169–74. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176370.

54. Capozzi V, et al. Lactic acid bacteria producing B-group vitamins: a great potential for functional cereals products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:1383–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4440-2.

55. Taranto MP, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 produces cobalamin. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:5643–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.18.5643-5647.2003.

56. Laino JE, et al. Production of natural folates by lactic acid bacteria starter cultures isolated from artisanal Argentinean yogurts. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58:581–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/w2012-026.

57. Laino JE, et al. Applicability of a Lactobacillus amylovorus strain as co-culture for natural folate bio-enrichment of fermented milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;191:10–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jifoodmicro.2014.08.031.

58. Rossi M, Schwartz KB. Editorial: celiac disease and intestinal bacteria: not only gluten? J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:749–51. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1209784.

59. Sybesma W, et al. Increased production of folate by metabolic engineering of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:3069–76. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.6.3069-3076.2003.

60. Lin MY, Young CM. Folate levels in cultures of lactic acid bacteria. Int Dairy J. 2000;10:409–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(00)00056-X.

61. Mosso AL, et al. Increasing the folate content of tuber based foods using potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Food Res Int. 2018;109:168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.073.

62. D'Aimmo MR, et al. Folate-producing bifidobacteria: metabolism, genetics, and relevance. Microbiome Res Rep. 2024;3:11. https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2023.59.
63. Pompei A, et al. Folate production by bifidobacteria as a potential probiotic property. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:179–85. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01763-06.

64. LeBlanc JG, et al. Supplementation with engineered Lactococcus lactis improves the folate status in deficient rats. Nutrition. 2010;26:835–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2009.06.023.

65. LeBlanc JG, et al. Lactococcus lactis is capable of improving the riboflavin status in deficient rats. Br J Nutr. 2005;94:262–7. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20051473.

66. LeBlanc JG, et al. A novel dairy product fermented with Propionibacterium freudenreichii improves the riboflavin status of deficient rats. Nutrition. 2006;22:645–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2006.01.002.

67. Mokhtari Z, et al. The effects of Probiotic supplements on blood markers of endotoxin and lipid peroxidation in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery; a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, clinical trial with 13 months Follow-Up. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1248–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-03667-6.

68. Gibson GR, et al. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75.

69. Woodard GA, et al. Probiotics improve outcomes after Roux-en-Y gas- tric bypass surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1198–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0891-x.

70. Chen D, et al. Vitamin D3 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG/p40 synergize to protect mice from colitis by promoting vitamin D receptor expression and epithelial proliferation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/ izac238.

71. Belda E, et al. Impairment of gut microbial biotin metabolism and host biotin status in severe obesity: effect of biotin and prebiotic supplemen- tation on improved metabolism. Gut. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/ gutjnl-2021-325753.

72. Scholz-Ahrens KE, et al. Prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics affect mineral absorption, bone mineral content, and bone structure. J Nutr. 2007;137:S838– 846. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjn/137.3.838S.

73. Asemi Z, et al. Effect of multispecies probiotic supplements on serum miner- als, liver enzymes and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2014;35:90–5.

74. Bielik V, Kolisek M. Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Minerals in Relation to a healthy gut Microbiome. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms22136803.

75. Capcarova M, et al. Effects of Enterococcus faecium M 74 strain on selected blood and production parameters of laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2010;51:614– 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.513961.

76. Sugiharto S, et al. The effect of supplementation of multistrain pro- biotic preparation in combination with vitamins and minerals to the basal diet on the growth performance, carcass traits, and physiological response of broilers. Vet World. 2018;11:240–7. https://doi.org/10.14202/ vetworld.2018.240–247.

77. Turpin W, et al. Lactobacilli as multifaceted probiotics with poorly disclosed molecular mechanisms. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;143:87–102. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jifoodmicro.2010.07.032.

78. Chonan O, et al. Role of activity of gastrointestinal microflora in absorption of calcium and magnesium in rats fed beta1-4 linked galactooligosaccha- rides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2001;65:1872–5. https://doi.org/10.1271/ bbb.65.1872.

79. Barone M, et al. Gut microbiome-micronutrient interaction: the key to con- trolling the bioavailability of minerals and vitamins? BioFactors. 2022. https:// doi.org/10.1002/biof.1835.

80. Ballini A, et al. Effect of probiotics on the occurrence of nutrition absorption capacities in healthy children: a randomized double-blinded placebo-con- trolled pilot study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:8645–57. https://doi. org/10.26355/eurrev_201910_19182.

81. Parvaneh K, et al. Effect of probiotics supplementation on bone mineral content and bone mass density. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:595962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/595962.

82. Wiertsema SP et al. (2021) The Interplay between the Gut Microbiome and the Immune System in the Context of Infectious Diseases throughout Life and the Role of Nutrition in Optimizing Treatment Strategies. *Nutrients* 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030886.

83. Kechau N, et al. Identification of one novel candidate probiotic Lactobacil- lus plantarum strain active against influenza virus infection in mice by a

large-scale screening. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:1491–9. https://doi. org/10.1128/AEM.03075-12.

84. Wang X, et al. Probiotics Regulate Gut Microbiota: an effective method to improve immunity. Molecules. 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ molecules26196076.

85. Huang CY, et al. A stable antimicrobial peptide with dual functions of treating and preventing citrus Huanglongbing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019628118.

86. Latif A, et al. Probiotics: mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1216674. https://doi. org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216674.

87. Kawashima T, et al. The molecular mechanism for activating IgA production by Pediococcus acidilactici K15 and the clinical impact in a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5065. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23404-4.

88. Martin R, et al. The potential probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 strain protects the intestinal barrier by stimulating both mucus production and cytoprotective response. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5398. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-019-41738-5.

89. Kim MH et al. (2013) Short-chain fatty acids activate GPR41 and GPR43 on intestinal epithelial cells to promote inflammatory responses in mice. *Gastroenterology* 145, 396–406 e391-310. https://doi.org/10.1053/j. gastro.2013.04.056.

90. Luu M, Visekruna A. Short-chain fatty acids: bacterial messengers modulating the immunometabolism of T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2019;49:842–8. https://doi. org/10.1002/eji.201848009.

91. Macho Fernandez E, et al. Anti-inflammatory capacity of selected lactobacilli in experimental colitis is driven by NOD2-mediated recognition of a specific peptidoglycan-derived muropeptide. Gut. 2011;60:1050–9. https://doi. org/10.1136/gut.2010.232918.

92. Nishihira J, et al. Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 stimulates immunoglobulin production and innate immunity after influenza vaccination in healthy adult volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Funct Foods Health Disease. 2016;6:544–68.

93. Bozkurt HS, Quigley EM. The probiotic Bifidobacterium in the manage- ment of Coronavirus: a theoretical basis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2020;34:2058738420961304. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058738420961304.

94. Chen J, et al. The intestinal microbiota and improving the efficacy of COVID- 19 vaccinations. J Funct Foods. 2021;87:104850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jff.2021.104850.

95. Gohil K, et al. Probiotics in the prophylaxis of COVID-19: something is better than nothing. 3 Biotech. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13205-13020-02554-13201.

96. Hung YP, et al. Gut dysbiosis during COVID-19 and potential effect of Probiot- ics. Microorganisms. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081605.

97. Biesalski HK. Nutrition meets the microbiome: micronutrients and the microbiota. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1372:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ nyas.13145.

98. Cantorna MT, et al. Vitamin A and vitamin D regulate the microbial complex- ity, barrier function, and the mucosal immune responses to ensure intestinal homeostasis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;54:184–92. https://doi.org/10.1 080/10409238.2019.1611734.

99. Ooi JH, et al. Vitamin D regulates the gut microbiome and protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. J Nutr. 2013;143:1679–86. https://doi. org/10.3945/jn.113.180794.

100. Youssef DA, et al. Antimicrobial implications of vitamin D. Dermatoendoci- nol. 2011;3:220–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/derm.3.4.15027.

101. Ueland PM, et al. Inflammation, vitamin B6 and related pathways. Mol Aspects Med. 2017;53:10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2016.08.001.

102. Degnan PH, et al. Vitamin B12 as a modulator of gut microbial ecology. Cell Metab. 2014;20:769–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.002.

103. Pehlivan FE. (2017) Vitamin C: An Antioxidant Agent. *InTech Open Science Chap.* 2. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69660.

104. Ly NP, et al. Gut microbiota, probiotics, and vitamin D: interrelated exposures influencing allergy, asthma, and obesity? J Allergy Clin Immu- nol. 2011;127:1087–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.015. quiz 1095 – 1086.

105. Yamoto EA, Jorgensen TN. Relationships between vitamin D, gut microbi- ome, and systemic autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3141. https://doi. org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03141.

106. Steinert RE, et al. Vitamins for the gut Microbiome. Trends Mol Med. 2020;26:137–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.11.005.
107. Liang L, et al. Intraperitoneal supplementation of iron alleviates dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis by enhancing intestinal barrier function. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;144:112253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112253.

108. Shao YX, et al. Zinc supplementation, via GPR39, Upregulates PKCzeta to protect Intestinal Barrier Integrity in Caco-2 cells challenged by Sal mo n e l a e n t e r i c a S e r o v a r Typhimurium. J Nutr. 2017;147:1282-9. https://doi. org/10.3945/jn.116.243238.

109. Bonaventura P, et al. Zinc and its role in immunity and inflammation. Autoim- mun Rev. 2015;14:277-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2014.11.008.

110. Huang Z, et al. The role of selenium in inflammation and immunity: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16:705-43. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.4145.

111. Piuri G, et al. Magnesium in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabe- tes. Nutrients. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020320.

112. Lee H, Ko G. Antiviral effect of vitamin A on norovirus infection via modula- tion of the gut microbiome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25835. https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep25835.

113. de Vrese M, et al. Probiotic bacteria reduced duration and severity but not the incidence of common cold episodes in a double blind, random- ized, controlled trial. Vaccine. 2006;24:6670-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. vaccine.2006.05.048.

114. Jaeggi T, et al. Iron fortification adversely affects the gut microbiome, increases pathogen abundance and induces intestinal inflamma- tion in Kenyan infants. Gut. 2015;64:731-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/ gutjnl-2014-307720.

115. Paganini D, Zimmermann MB. The effects of iron fortification and supple- mentation on the gut microbiome and diarrhea in infants and children: a review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:S1688-1693. https://doi.org/10.3945/ ajcn.117.156067.

116. Allaert FA, et al. Effect of magnesium, probiotic, and vitamin food supple- mentation in healthy subjects with psychological stress and evaluation of a persistent effect after discontinuing intake. Panminerva Med. 2016;58:263-70.

117. Ostadmohammadi V, et al. Vitamin D and probiotic co-supplementation affects mental health, hormonal, inflammatory and oxidative stress param- eters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0480-x.

118. Hoppe M, et al. Freeze-dried Lactobacillus plantarum 299v increases iron absorption in young females-double isotope sequential single-blind studies in menstruating women. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189141. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189141.

119. Malin M, et al. Promotion of IgA immune response in patients with Crohn's disease by oral bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus GG. Ann Nutr Metab. 1996;40:137-45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000177907.

120. Chaiyasut C, et al. Influence of Lactobacillus rhamnosus supplementation on the Glycaemic Index, lipid Profile, and Microbiome of Healthy Elderly subjects: a preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial. Foods. 2024;13. https://doi. org/10.3390/foods13091293.

121. Berni Canani R, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-supplemented formula expands butyrate-producing bacterial strains in food allergic infants. ISME J. 2016;10:742-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.151.

122. Wildt S, et al. Probiotic treatment of collagenous colitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:395-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MIB.0000218763.99334.49.

123. Ejtahed HS, et al. Effect of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus aci- dophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis on lipid profile in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:3288-94. https://doi.org/10.3168/ jds.2010-4128.

124. Pakdaman MN, et al. The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symp- tomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, crossover clinical trial. Nutr J. 2016;15:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12937-016-0172-y.

125. Kondo J, et al. Modulatory effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on def- ecation in elderly patients receiving enteral feeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:2162-70. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2162.

126. Sato S, et al. Effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Bifidobacterium breve MCC1274 on body composition in normal and overweight adults in Randomized Placebo-controlled study. Nutrients. 2024;16. https://doi. org/10.3390/nu16060815.

127. Kotzampassi K, et al. Benefits of a synbiotic formula (synbiotic 2000Forte) in critically ill trauma patients: early results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2006;30:1848-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0653-1.

128. Kazmierczak-Siedlecka K, et al. The use of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v (DSM 9843) in cancer patients receiving home enteral nutrition - study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. Nutr J. 2020;19:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00598-w.

129. Wang LJ, et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum on clinical characteristics and gut microbiota in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder. J Pers Med. 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020227.

130. O'Mahony L, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastro- enterology. 2005;128:541-51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.050.

131. Guandalini S, et al. VSL#3 improves symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51:24-30. https://doi. org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181ca4d95.

132. Gionchetti P, et al. Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenter- ology. 2000;119:305-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2000.9370.

133. Abid MB, Koh CJ. Probiotics in health and disease: fooling Mother Nature? Infection. 2019;47:911-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-019-01351-0.

134. Bermudez-Brito M, et al. Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61:160-74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342079.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.