# Comparing the quality of two traditional fried street foods from the raw material to the end product: The Beninese cowpea-based ata and the Italian wheat-based popizza

Davide de Angelis, Yann Emeric Madode, Aurélien Briffaz, Joseph Djidjoho

Hounhouigan, Antonella Pasqualone, Carmine Summo

► To cite this version:

Davide de Angelis, Yann Emeric Madode, Aurélien Briffaz, Joseph Djidjoho Hounhouigan, Antonella Pasqualone, et al.. Comparing the quality of two traditional fried street foods from the raw material to the end product: The Beninese cowpea-based ata and the Italian wheat-based popizza. Legume Science, 2020, 2 (2), pp.e35. 10.1002/leg3.35 . hal-05295211

HAL Id: hal-05295211

https://hal.science/hal-05295211v1

Submitted on 3 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

WILEY

# Comparing the quality of two traditional fried street foods from the raw material to the end product: The Beninese cowpea-based *ata* and the Italian wheat-based *popizza*

Davide De Angelis<fnref n="1" />

Yann E. Madodé<fnref n="2" />

Aurélien Briffaz<fnref n="3" />

Djidjoho Joseph Hounhouigan<fnref n="2" />

Antonella Pasqualone<fnref n="1" />

Carmine Summo<fnref n="1" />

**Correspondence**

Antonella Pasqualone, Department of Soil, Plant and Food Science (DISSPA), Food Science and Technology Unit, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Via Amendola, 165/a, I-70126 Bari, Italy.

Email: antonella.pasqualone@uniba.it

**Funding information**

Agropolis Fondation, Grant/Award Number: ANR-10-LABX-0001-01

**Abstract**

Street food plays a recognized socioeconomic role, offering opportunities of employment particularly for women and providing cheap food to lower income people. West Africa is characterized by a great diversity of traditional foods, widely consumed but poorly investigated. Ata is a fried dough made of cowpea flour, very popular in Benin. In Southern Italy, popizza is prepared in a very similar way as ata, but using wheat flour. This work aimed at comparing the main physicochemical characteristics of ata and popizza, from the raw material to the end product. Cowpea flour showed significantly higher levels of proteins (23.25 vs. 13.48 g 100 g⁻<fnref n="1" /> on dry matter), total phenolic compounds (0.73 vs. 0.41 mg g⁻<fnref n="1" /> of ferulic acid d.m.), antioxidant activity (2.84 vs. 0.86 µmol Trolox g⁻<fnref n="1" /> d.m.), as well as higher water absorption capacity (1.01 vs. 0.61 g water per gram flour) and particularly higher water solubility index (23.01 vs. 6.69 g 100 g⁻<fnref n="1" />) than wheat flour. The two flours showed different pasting characteristics: starch swelling occurred at a lower temperature in cowpea than in wheat flour and produced a less viscous gel. Due to absence of gluten and limited viscosity of starchy fraction, ata was less porous and more springy than popizza. Moreover, ata showed higher oil uptake than popizza (22.2 vs. 14.1 g oil 100 g⁻<fnref n="1" /> product) and was also characterized by a browner surface than popizza. Knowledge about the quality features of these traditional foods and their raw material could enhance their marketing, with positive effects on local economy.

**KEYWORDS**

ata, cowpea flour, phenolic compounds, popizza, street food, traditional food, wheat flour

## 1 | INTRODUCTION

The preparation of street food plays a recognized socioeconomic role, offering opportunities of employment particularly for women and providing food at affordable cost to lower income people (Okojie & Isah, 2014). On the other hand, the way street foods are prepared arises several food safety issues. Among street foods,

those prepared by frying and immediately consumed are the safest (Rane, 2011).

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), also known as black-eyed pea, is the fifth most produced pulse in the world (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2017) and has the peculiar characteristic of growing in semiarid and dry environments. Owing to its drought tolerance, cowpea production is mainly concentrated in Africa (Gómez, 2003).

<footnote n="1">¹Department of Soil, Plant and Food Science (DISSPA), Food Science and Technology Unit, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Laboratory of Food Sciences, Campus d'Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³CIRAD, UMR Qualisud Food Process Engineering research unit, Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote>This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. Legume Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</footnote>
West Africa, in particular, where cowpea is commonly and traditionally consumed, accounts for the majority of the world production (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2017). Characterized by a high content of proteins (Jayathilake et al., 2018), cowpea is the principal proteinaceous food for a nutritionally vulnerable population.

African food culture is characterized by several indigenous and traditional food products, widely consumed but poorly investigated (Madodé et al., 2011). In Benin, cowpea is the basic ingredient in the preparation of abobo (boiled cotyledons), ata (fried dumplings, also named atta), magni-magni (steam cooked paste), adowè (purée), and ataclè (very dry fritters; Dovlo, Williams, & Zoaka, 1976; Madodé et al., 2011). In particular, ata is a fried street food eaten at breakfast, lunch, or as a snack, popular also in Togo, Nigeria (where is named akara) and Ghana (where is named koose) (Madodé et al., 2011). Ata is traditionally made by steeping, wet dehulling, and then grinding cowpea beans. The resulting paste is then used to prepare a batter that can be variously seasoned prior to deep frying (Madodé et al., 2011). To skip the laborious and time-consuming traditional wet dehulling, the batter can be prepared more rapidly starting from dry-milled cowpea flour (Dovlo et al., 1976; Ihediohanma, Ofoedu, Ojimba, Okafor, & Adedokun, 2014; Kethireddipalli, Hung, McWatters, & Phillips, 2002). The nutritional composition of ata has already been investigated, showing high fat content but also a good protein content and an interesting presence of micronutrients such as calcium, iron, and zinc (Madodé et al., 2011). Cowpea processing into ata is traditionally made by women, and the income consequent to the sale of these fritters contributes to poverty reduction (Agazounon, Coulibaly, & Houndekon, 2004).

Very far from Benin, in the Apulia region of Southern Italy, a fried street food named popizza (plural popizze, also named pettola, pl. pettole) is traditionally prepared in a very similar way as ata (Trabace, 2015). Popizza is prepared from common wheat flour, instead of cowpea flour in the case of ata, and its artisanal production has become an unexpected source of income for Apulian jobless women, who prepare this dish at the corners of the streets close to historical sites. Such practice recalls the picture of ata production in Benin and also in West Africa. Popizza is much appreciated by locals, as well as by the increasing number of tourists visiting Apulia, being tasty and inexpensive. However, despite its popularity, popizza has never been studied, and there are no scientific data about its characteristics.

In this frame, the aim of this work was to define the main quality characteristics of these two poorly studied traditional street foods, ata and popizza, starting from the analysis of the flours used for their preparation.

# 2 | MATERIAL AND METHODS

## 2.1 | Raw material

Refined flour of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), produced in Benin by a local company (Produits Dajo, Abomey-Calavi, Benin), was kindly provided by Laboratory of Food Sciences of the University of

Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin. Refined flour of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) "0" type (Selezione Casillo, Corato, Italy) was purchased in Italy at local retailers. The quality characteristics of 0 type flour are legally ruled (Italian Presidential Decree, 2001). Compressed baker's yeast (Saccaromyces cerevisiae, "Pinnacle" yeast, AB Mauri, Casteggio, Italy) and salt (Piazzolla Sali, Margherita di Savoia, Italy) were purchased at local Italian retailers.

## 2.2 | Preparation of ata and popizza

Ata and popizza fritters were prepared at the Food Science laboratories of the Department of Soil, Plant and Food Science of the University of Bari, Italy. Ingredients of ata were the following: 100 g of cowpea refined flour, 120 ml of tap water, 2.5 g of compressed baker's yeast, and 4 g of salt. Ingredients of popizza were the following: 100 g of wheat refined flour "0" type, 95 ml of tap water, 2.5 g of compressed baker's yeast, and 4 g of salt. The amount of water was adjusted so that a batter with similar consistency was obtained both for ata and popizza. Ata and popizza fritters were prepared according to the procedure mentioned on cowpea flour packaging. Flour and yeast were put in a bowl and water at room temperature was added little by little, while constantly mixing (manually, with a fork) for 5 min, in order to obtain a homogeneous mixture without lumps. Then, salt was added and the mixture was stirred for other 15 min. The dense batter thus obtained was left to rise in the bowl, covered by a clean cotton cloth, for 90 min at room temperature (approximately 25°C). After leavening, batter portions of uniform size (sphere, 4.0 ± 0.3-cm diameter) were taken with the help of two tablespoons and immersed in extra virgin olive oil, previously heated to 150°C, for deep frying (Zephir deep fryer, ZHC501, Westim S.p.A., Rome, Italy). Ata was fried for 6 min, whereas popizza for 10 min. The frying time was defined in preliminary trials to obtain perfect cooking at the center of the products, assessed by cutting and inspecting them. Samples were left to cool spontaneously at room temperature and immediately analyzed.

## 2.3 | Flour particle size distribution

The particle size distribution was analyzed by a LabSifter (KBF7SN, Buhler, Switzerland). Flours (100 g) were sifted for 5 min on sieves with opening of 425, 300, 212, 150, and 106 µm. The analysis was carried out in triplicate.

## 2.4 | Flour chemical composition

Protein (total nitrogen × 5.7), ash, and moisture contents were determined according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) methods 979.09, 923.03, and 925.10, respectively (AOAC, 2006). Total dietary fiber was determined by the enzymatic-gravimetric procedure described in the AOAC method 991.43 (AOAC, 2006). Lipid content was determined by means of a Soxhlet apparatus using diethyl
ether (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) as extracting solvent (AOAC, 2006). Total carbohydrate content was obtained by subtracting from 100 g of flour, on dry basis, its content of protein, lipid, ash, and dietary fiber. The fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters according to AOCS method Ch 1-91 (AOCS, 1993), with the conditions previously described in Summo et al. (2019a). All determinations were performed in triplicate.

## 2.5 | Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of flours

An aqueous-methanol extract (20/80 v/v) was prepared as follows: 1 g of flour was mixed with 10 ml of solvent in a centrifuge tube, stirred for 2 hr in the dark, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min to recover the supernatant. The total phenolic compounds were then determined using the method of Pasqualone et al. (2015) and expressed in milligram per gram of ferulic acid on dry matter, with fer- ulic acid being one of the most represented phenolic compounds in both cowpea (Gutiérrez-Uribe, Romo-Lopez, & Serna-Saldívar, 2011) and wheat (Hernández, Afonso, Rodríguez, & Díaz, 2011). The antioxi- dant activity was evaluated by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging capacity assay as reported in Pasqualone et al. (2015) and was expressed as µmol Trolox equivalent g⁻¹ on dry matter. The determinations were performed in triplicate.

## 2.6 | Physicochemical properties of flours

Water absorption index (WAI), water solubility index (WSI), water absorption capacity (WAC), and bulk density of flours were deter- mined according to the procedures reported by Du, Jiang, Yu, and Jane (2014). WAI (expressed in g swollen sediment g⁻¹ flour) and WSI (expressed in g dissolved solids 100 g⁻¹ flour) were assessed after heating a flour suspension in distilled water at 70°C, whereas WAC (expressed in g water g⁻¹ flour) was assessed at room temperature. All determinations were performed in triplicate.

## 2.7 | Pasting characteristics of flours

Starch properties were determined using a Brabender micro- viscoamylograph (Brabender Instruments, Duisburg, Germany), suspending 15 g of flour (14.0% moisture basis) in 100 ml of distilled water. The instrument was programmed to continuously stir at 250 rpm while performing heating and cooling steps as follows: from 30°C up to 95°C at the rate of 1.5°C/min, keeping 95°C for 30 min, cooling down to 50°C at 1.5°C/min, and holding 50°C for 30 min. The viscosity values at the peak (peak viscosity), at the end of the holding period at 95°C (minimum viscosity), and at the end of cooling period (cooling maximum viscosity) were recorded. The differences between peak viscosity and minimum viscosity and between cooling maximum viscosity and minimum viscosity were evaluated as breakdown

(BD) and setback, respectively. All determinations were performed in triplicate.

## 2.8 | Color of ata and popizza fritters

Instrumental determination of surface and inner color of ata and pop- izza fritters was carried out using the CM-600d colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) supported by SpectraMagic NX software (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). Lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yel- lowness (b*) were determined. All color determinations were repli- cated four times.

## 2.9 | Specific volume of ata and popizza fritters

Specific volume was determined by rapeseed displacement, as in AACC method 10-10 (AACC, 2000). The determination was per- formed in triplicate.

## 2.10 | Texture profile analysis of ata and popizza fritters

Texture profile analysis was carried out using the Z1.0 TN texture analyzer (Zwick Roell, Ulm, Germany) equipped with a 3.5-cm diame- ter cylindrical probe and a 50-N load cell. The samples were subjected to a two-compression cycle, with 5 s of break and 1 mm s⁻¹ of speed, up to 40% of recorded deformation, with 10 replications.

## 2.11 | Image analysis of ata and popizza fritters

Ata and popizza fritters were cut in two halves, and the image of the inner was acquired by a Canon 600d DSLR camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a Sigma 17–70 mm f/2.8 (Sigma Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan), saved in TIFF format with no compression, and processed by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). Each image was converted into 8-bit grayscale, and a section of 25 × 25 mm was cropped from the center of the product, then it was filtered by thresholding function in order to obtain the best cell resolution. Image analysis was performed to detect the cells with an area >0.05 mm² and circularity in the range 0–1, where 1 is the value attributed to perfectly circular cells and 0 to thin thread-like cells. The total number of cells, mean area of all the observed cells, and cell density (number of cells/mm²) have been measured according to Scheuer et al. (2014). Three replicated analyses were done.

## 2.12 | Oil uptake of ata and popizza fritters

Oil uptake was determined by Soxhlet extraction as in Shih and Daigle (1999). Diethyl ether (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was used as
extracting solvent. The extraction time accounted to 6 hr. Three replicated analyses were done.

## 2.13 | Statistical analysis

All the experimental data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Significant differences were determined at *p* < .05 by the XLStat software (Addinsoft SARL, New York, NY, USA).

# 3 | RESULTS

## 3.1 | Nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, and physicochemical properties of flours

As for nutritional composition, the protein content of cowpea flour reached 23.25 g 100 g⁻¹ d.m., almost doubling the protein content of wheat flour (Table 1). On the contrary, the carbohydrate content was much lower in cowpea than in wheat flour.

The lipid fraction, significantly more abundant in cowpea than in wheat flour, was mostly constituted by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), whose sum was higher in wheat than in cowpea flour (Table 2). Linoleic acid was the most represented fatty acid, followed by the linolenic one. The sum of monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly constituted by oleic acid, was higher in wheat than in cowpea flour. In cowpea flour, the content of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) accounted for 40.96% of total fatty acids, approximately doubling the value found in wheat flour. Palmitic acid was the most important SFA of cowpea flour, followed by stearic acid.

No significant differences between flours were found in the content of total dietary fiber that was slightly higher than 3 g 100 g⁻¹ d.m. in both the flours, whereas ash content was higher in cowpea than in wheat flour (Table 1).

Cowpea flour was characterized by significantly higher levels of total phenolic compounds (0.73 mg g⁻¹ of ferulic acid d.m.) than wheat flour (0.41 mg g⁻¹ of ferulic acid d.m.). Owing to its higher content of total phenolic compounds, cowpea flour showed higher in vitro antioxidant activity than wheat flour (2.84 vs. 0.86 µmol Trolox g⁻¹ d.m.).

Cowpea and wheat flour showed a similar particle size distribution, but wheat flour was slightly coarser, with significantly higher amounts of particles in the ranges 212–300 and 150–212 µm.

Significant differences between cowpea and wheat flours were observed in terms of physicochemical properties. Indeed, the BD, which indicates the mass per unit of occupied volume, was significantly higher in cowpea than in wheat flour. Cowpea flour showed higher WSI (23.01 g dissolved solids 100 g⁻¹ flour) and lower WAI (2.96 g swollen sediment g⁻¹ flour) than wheat flour (6.69 g dissolved solids 100 g⁻¹ flour and 5.13 g swollen sediment g⁻¹ flour, respectively). Moreover, cowpea flour showed higher WAC than wheat flour.

<table><caption>**TABLE 1** Average nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, and physicochemical properties of cowpea and wheat flours used to prepare *ata* and *popizza* fritters</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Cowpea flour</th><th>Wheat flour</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Proximate composition and bioactive compounds</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Lipids (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>1.95<sup>a</sup> ± 0.19</td><td>1.17<sup>b</sup> ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Proteins (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>23.25<sup>a</sup> ± 0.35</td><td>13.48<sup>b</sup> ± 0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Carbohydrates (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>69.11<sup>b</sup><br>± 0.46</td><td>81.38<sup>a</sup> ± 0.26</td></tr><tr><td>Ashes (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>2.55<sup>a</sup> ± 0.09</td><td>0.62<sup>b</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Total dietary fiber<br>(g 100 g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>3.14<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td><td>3.38<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Total phenolic compounds<br>(mg ferulic acid g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>0.73<sup>a</sup> ± 0.03</td><td>0.41<sup>b</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Antioxidant activity<br>(µmol Trolox g<sup>-1</sup> d.m.)</td><td>2.84<sup>a</sup> ± 0.05</td><td>0.86<sup>b</sup> ± 0.12</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Particle size distribution</strong></td></tr><tr><td>>425 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>0.3<sup>a</sup> ± 0.1</td><td>0.5<sup>a</sup> ± 0.2</td></tr><tr><td>300–425 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>1.9<sup>b</sup> ± 0.1</td><td>2.7<sup>a</sup> ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>212–300 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>7.9<sup>b</sup> ± 1.7</td><td>13.8<sup>a</sup> ± 1.3</td></tr><tr><td>150–212 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>44.5<sup>a</sup> ± 4.2</td><td>57.5<sup>a</sup> ± 9.1</td></tr><tr><td>106–150 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>28.2<sup>a</sup> ± 1.2</td><td>12.5<sup>b</sup> ± 2.1</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;106 µm (g 100 g<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>17.2<sup>a</sup> ± 4.5</td><td>6.9<sup>b</sup> ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Physicochemical properties</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Bulk density (g ml<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>0.91<sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.84<sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Water absorption index<br>(g swollen sediment g<sup>-1</sup> flour)</td><td>2.96<sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>5.13<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Water solubility index<br>(g dissolved solids 100 g<sup>-1</sup> flour)</td><td>23.01<sup>a</sup> ± 0.73</td><td>6.69<sup>b</sup> ± 0.60</td></tr><tr><td>Water absorption capacity<br>(g water g<sup>-1</sup> flour)</td><td>1.01<sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.61<sup>b</sup> ± 0.00</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Pasting characteristics</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Pasting temperature at peak (°C)</td><td>77<sup>b</sup> ± 1</td><td>86<sup>a</sup> ± 1</td></tr><tr><td>Peak viscosity (BU)</td><td>457<sup>b</sup> ± 13</td><td>651<sup>a</sup> ± 19</td></tr><tr><td>Minimum viscosity (BU)</td><td>215<sup>b</sup> ± 11</td><td>354<sup>a</sup> ± 8</td></tr><tr><td>Cooling maximum viscosity (BU)</td><td>613<sup>b</sup> ± 9</td><td>1005<sup>a</sup> ± 21</td></tr><tr><td>Breakdown (BU)</td><td>242<sup>b</sup> ± 6</td><td>297<sup>a</sup> ± 9</td></tr><tr><td>Setback (BU)</td><td>398<sup>b</sup> ± 11</td><td>651<sup>a</sup> ± 17</td></tr></tbody></table>

a,b Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant differences at *p* < .05.

Abbreviation: BU, Brabender Units.

The pasting properties of aqueous suspensions of cowpea and wheat flour were different. Cowpea paste showed a lower peak viscosity than wheat paste. When the gel was held at 95°C for 30 min, cowpea paste showed also a lower value of minimum viscosity than wheat paste. During subsequent cooling, cowpea formed a less firm gel than wheat flour (613 vs. 1,005 BU).
<table><caption>**TABLE 2** Fatty acid composition (mean and standard deviation, expressed as g 100 g⁻¹) and sum of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids of cowpea and wheat flours used to prepare *ata* and *popizza* fritters</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Cowpea flour</th><th>Wheat flour</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C<sub>14:0</sub></td><td>1.85<sup>a</sup> ± 0.14</td><td>0.84<sup>b</sup> ± 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>15:0</sub></td><td>0.12<sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>0.15<sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>16:0</sub></td><td>25.15<sup>a</sup> ± 0.15</td><td>18.90<sup>b</sup> ± 0.19</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>16:1</sub></td><td>0.11<sup>b</sup> ± 0.05</td><td>0.27<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>17:0</sub></td><td>0.35<sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.12<sup>b</sup> ± 0.00</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>17:1</sub></td><td>0.02<sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>0.09<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>18:0</sub></td><td>5.58<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td><td>1.26<sup>b</sup> ± 0.24</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>18:1</sub></td><td>10.58<sup>b</sup> ± 0.61</td><td>16.07<sup>a</sup> ± 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>18:2</sub></td><td>29.52<sup>b</sup> ± 0.49</td><td>57.31<sup>a</sup> ± 0.08</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>20:0</sub></td><td>1.89<sup>a</sup> ± 0.06</td><td>0.45<sup>b</sup> ± 0.16</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>18:3</sub></td><td>18.54<sup>a</sup> ± 0.41</td><td>3.85<sup>b</sup> ± 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>20:1</sub></td><td>0.11 ± 0.00</td><td>n.d.</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>20:2</sub></td><td>0.08<sup>a</sup> ± 0.02</td><td>0.07<sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>22:0</sub></td><td>3.74<sup>a</sup> ± 0.11</td><td>0.25<sup>b</sup> ± 0.07</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>23:0</sub></td><td>0.42<sup>a</sup> ± 0.14</td><td>0.20<sup>a</sup> ± 0.21</td></tr><tr><td>C<sub>24:0</sub></td><td>1.86<sup>a</sup> ± 0.04</td><td>0.17<sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td></tr><tr><td>Σ<sub>SFA</sub></td><td>40.96<sup>a</sup></td><td>22.34<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Σ<sub>MUFA</sub></td><td>10.85<sup>b</sup></td><td>16.42<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Σ<sub>PUFA</sub></td><td>48.19<sup>b</sup></td><td>61.23<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

## 3.2 | Physicochemical properties of fritters

### 3.2.1 | Surface and inner color

Table 3 reports the colorimetric indices of *ata* and *popizza*, determined on both crust and crumb. The external surface of the two fritters showed a considerably different color. *Ata* was characterized by an intensely brown external color, whereas *popizza* showed a light yellow surface. Therefore, redness (*a*) was higher in *ata*, whereas *popizza* had a significantly higher yellowness (*b*) and lightness (*L*\*).

The color of crumb was lighter than surface in both the fritters. Lightness of inner crumb did not show significant differences between *ata* and *popizza*, whereas both redness and yellowness were significantly higher in *ata* (2.27 and 21.43, respectively) than in *popizza* (−0.26 and 17.25, respectively), although the differences in these parameters were low compared with those found for the crust.

### 3.2.2 | Crumb structure and texture, oil uptake

*Ata* showed a more finely porous crumb structure than *popizza*, with a significantly higher number of cells (220 vs. 96 in *ata* and in *popizza*, respectively) (Table 3). The number of crumb cells identified is

<table><caption>**TABLE 3** Surface and inner color, crumb texture and structure, and oil uptake of *ata* and *popizza* fritters</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Ata</th><th>Popizza</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Surface color</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>L<sup>*</sup></td><td>36.36<sup>b</sup> ± 2.43</td><td>62.54<sup>a</sup> ± 5.43</td></tr><tr><td>a<sup>*</sup></td><td>19.20<sup>a</sup> ± 1.71</td><td>3.71<sup>b</sup> ± 1.13</td></tr><tr><td>b<sup>*</sup></td><td>23.48<sup>b</sup> ± 4.07</td><td>32.11<sup>a</sup> ± 1.93</td></tr><tr><td>Inner color</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>L<sup>*</sup></td><td>69.52<sup>a</sup> ± 1.99</td><td>68.61<sup>a</sup> ± 3.11</td></tr><tr><td>a<sup>*</sup></td><td>2.27<sup>a</sup> ± 0.42</td><td>−0.26<sup>b</sup> ± 0.14</td></tr><tr><td>b<sup>*</sup></td><td>21.43<sup>a</sup> ± 1.08</td><td>17.25<sup>b</sup> ± 1.81</td></tr><tr><td>Crumb texture</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Springiness</td><td>0.84<sup>a</sup> ± 0.05</td><td>0.77<sup>b</sup> ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Gumminess (N)</td><td>12.45<sup>a</sup> ± 2.92</td><td>9.83<sup>a</sup> ± 1.72</td></tr><tr><td>Chewiness (N)</td><td>10.45<sup>a</sup> ± 2.31</td><td>8.31<sup>a</sup> ± 2.47</td></tr><tr><td>Cohesiveness</td><td>0.50<sup>a</sup> ± 0.09</td><td>0.54<sup>a</sup> ± 0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Hardness (N)</td><td>22.63<sup>a</sup> ± 3.01</td><td>21.44<sup>a</sup> ± 4.00</td></tr><tr><td>Crumb structure</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mean cell area (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>0.43<sup>b</sup> ± 0.09</td><td>1.47<sup>a</sup> ± 0.55</td></tr><tr><td>Cell density (no. cells/mm<sup>2</sup>)</td><td>524<sup>a</sup> ± 139</td><td>73<sup>b</sup> ± 32</td></tr><tr><td>Number of cells</td><td>220<sup>a</sup> ± 23</td><td>96<sup>b</sup> ± 19</td></tr><tr><td>Specific volume (ml g<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td>3.73<sup>b</sup> ± 0.51</td><td>5.11<sup>a</sup> ± 0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Oil uptake (g oil 100 g<sup>−1</sup> product)</td><td>22.2<sup>a</sup> ± 3.5</td><td>14.1<sup>b</sup> ± 0.5</td></tr></tbody></table>

inversely related to cell area, therefore *ata* was characterized by a smaller cell area than *popizza*. Consequently, cell density, calculated as the number of observations divided by cell area, was also higher in *ata* than in *popizza*.

To better explain the results of image analysis, cell area was categorized in 12 classes. The relative frequency of each class is reported in Figure 1. In both fritters, the majority of cells were in the range 0.05–1 mm². The differences found considering separately the first three cell area classes (0.05–0.1, 0.1–0.2, and 0.2–1.0 mm²) were not significant. However, by considering the sum of cells in the range 0.05–1 mm², *ata* was characterized by the highest presence of small cells (*p* = .003). On the other hand, a significantly higher number of large cells was found in *popizza* crumb. In this case, the range of cells area was between 1 and 30 mm², with significant differences found only for the ranges 1–2, 2–4, 4–6, 6–8, and 10–15 mm² (Figure 1).

Regarding texture, although not significantly, *ata* was harder, gummier, and chewier than *popizza*. Significant differences, however, were observed for springiness that was higher in *ata* than in *popizza* fritters. *Ata* showed a lower specific volume than *popizza*.

Regarding oil uptake (Table 3), *ata* was characterized by a markedly higher oil uptake than *popizza*.

<footnote>a,b Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant differences at *p* < .05.</footnote>

<footnote>Note. *L*\*, *a*\*, and *b*\* indicate lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively.</footnote>

<footnote>a,b Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant differences at *p* < .05.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** Cell area distribution of the inner surface of *popizza* and *ata* fritters. A total of 12 classes of cell areas were identified. Different letters indicate significant differences at *p* < .05</figcaption></figure>

4 | DISCUSSION

4.1 | Nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, and physicochemical properties of flours

As for wheat flour (Table 1), protein and ash content met the require-
ments of current Italian rules for “type 0” category (Italian Presidential
Decree, 2001). Lipid content and fatty acid composition (Table 2)
agreed with previous works (Caponio, Summo, Pasqualone, Paradiso, &
Gomes, 2009; Pasqualone, Paradiso, Summo, Caponio, & Gomes,
2014).

Cowpea was richer in proteins than wheat flour, which is particu-
larly important in developing countries. Both protein and lipid con-
tents of cowpea flour agreed with other studies (Antova, Stoilova, &
Ivanova, 2014; Carvalho et al., 2012; Madodé et al., 2012). Also fiber
content was within the range observed by other authors: Rivas-Vega
et al. (2006) reported 2.6 g 100 g⁻¹, and Khalid, Elhardallou, and
Elkhalifa (2012) ascertained a fiber content of 4.1 g 100 g⁻¹. The ash
content, instead, was slightly lower than that reported in other studies
(Antova et al., 2014; Ihediohanma et al., 2014; Kerr, Ward,
McWatters, & Resurreccion, 2000).

The fatty acid composition of cowpea flour (Table 2) agreed with the findings of Antova et al. (2014). Overall, cowpea flour shows an unusual fatty acid composition if compared with other pulses, due to its high content of SFA and low content of monounsaturated fatty acid. The content of PUFAs, especially linolenic acid, that was more abundant than in other pulses such as chickpeas (Summo et al., 2019b), lentils, and peas (Caprioli et al., 2016) was particularly interesting. Linolenic acid is an *n*-3 essential fatty acid and, together with other PUFAs, is positively associated with favorable effects on human health, reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases (Baum et al., 2012).

Cowpea flour contained also higher levels of phenolic compounds
than wheat flour (Table 1). These molecules act as scavengers for free
radicals, thus preventing the cells from oxidative stress (Zhang & Tsao,
2016). The content of total phenolic compounds of cowpea seeds

was previously studied by other authors, that reported a range from
0.46 to 2.69 mg g⁻¹ of gallic acid, depending on the variety (Adjei-
Fremah, Jackai, & Worku, 2015). The phenolic compounds are mainly
located in the seed coat, thus the production process of cowpea flour
causes a loss in phenolics (Adebooye & Singh, 2007).

The physicochemical characteristics, which have a strong influ-
ence on food properties, showed significant differences between the
two flour types. The cowpea flour showed higher BD than wheat
flour, probably also due to the finer particle size compared with wheat
flour. The values observed for cowpea flour were higher than those
reported in previous studies for raw cowpea flours (Akubor, 2003;
Appiah, Asibuo, & Kumah, 2011). Such difference could result from
the treatments (soaking, dehulling, and drying) that underwent the
bean for obtaining the flour or by differences in the milling process.
BD influences both the textural properties of food and the packaging
specifications of flour and is particularly significant in the preparation
of weaning food formulations. During the cooking process of weaning
foods, the gelatinization of starch produces a highly viscous matrix,
which shows the best texture when it is appropriately thick and vis-
cous in order to be easily eaten by an infant. Therefore, flours with
low BD are easy digestible (Desikachar, 1980) and are suitable for the
production of infant and weaning foods. However, high BD values are
preferable for packing, storage, and transport because high amounts
of flour occupy a limited volume.

WAI represents the weight of swollen starch after heat treatment
of flour. It is related to the integrity of starch granules and to their
gelation properties (Du et al., 2014). WSI, related to WAI, quantifies
the amount of soluble solids remaining in the aqueous phase after
flour heating. The values observed for both WAI and WSI indicate a
higher presence of damaged starch—able to gelatinize easily absorbing
high amounts of water and releasing amylose—in cowpea flour than in
wheat flour.

WAC, determined at room temperature, directly reflects the abil-
ity of some macromolecules to bind water, such as polysaccharides
and proteins (Du et al., 2014). Cowpea flour showed higher WAC than
wheat flour, due to higher protein content and to the presence of
damaged starch, the latter indicated by the observed values of WAI
and WSI. The values of WAC observed in cowpea flour were lower
than those reported in other studies (Appiah et al., 2011; Khalid &
Elharadallou, 2013), probably due to differences in flour particle size,
as observed by Kerr et al. (2000), indicating that cowpea milling is not
perfectly standardized among different milling companies. WAC of
wheat flour agreed with previous works (Kumar & Saini, 2016).

The two types of flour showed different pasting characteristics
(Table 1). Starch swelling occurred at a lower temperature in cowpea
than in wheat flour and produced a less viscous gel. With cooling,
wheat flour showed a more marked setback, indicating a greater ten-
dency to starch retrogradation, as observed in previous works
(Mariotti, Zardi, Lucisano, & Pagani, 2005; Pasqualone et al., 2010).
The results for cowpea flour were similar to those reported by other
authors (Adebooye & Singh, 2008).

Proteins influence the pasting properties by reducing heat-
induced swelling of starch (Dericke et al., 2005). Therefore, the lower
peak viscosity of cowpea paste compared with wheat paste could be
due to the higher protein content of cowpea flour. Another factor that
concurred to lower the viscosity of cowpea paste was the higher pres-
ence of damaged starch than in wheat flour, as indicated by both WAI
and WSI. Damaged starch, in fact, increases water absorbing capacity
and sensibility to α-amylase and, consequently, decreases paste vis-
cosity (Farrand, 1964). Moreover, the heat-induced cross-linking of
gluten by disulfide bonds, occurring only in wheat flour, causes an
increase of paste viscosity (Attenburrow, Barnes, Davies, & Ingman,
1990).

## 4.2 | Physicochemical properties of fritters

### 4.2.1 | Surface and inner color

The differences in color between *ata* and *popizza* could be explained
by the highest content of damaged starch in cowpea flour, as indi-
rectly indicated by WAI, WSI, and by viscosity measures. In fact, the
combined presence of damaged starch and amylase determines an
increase of reducing sugars in the food matrix that could enhance
Maillard reaction with consequent browning, more marked in *ata* sur-
face. The brown external color of *ata* has been reported also by Prin-
yawiwatkul, McWatters, Beuchat, and Phillips (1994), whereas a light-
colored interior has been reported to be a quality feature, as the result
of perfect removal of seed coats and “black eyes” of cowpea beans
(Patterson, Phillips, McWatters, Hung, & Chinnan, 2004).

### 4.2.2 | Crumb structure and texture, oil uptake

The structural differences between the two fritters were related to
the different chemical composition and pasting properties of flours. In
particular, the lack of gluten in cowpea flour was the cause of the finer
crumb structure of *ata* compared with *popizza* (Figure 2). Indeed,

gluten confers to the dough its typical viscoelasticity and keeps the
integrity of gas cells allowing their expansion during fermentation and
baking, thus resulting in a spongy crumb (Masure, Wouters, Fierens, &
Delcour, 2019). Moreover, gluten network hampers the moisture loss
during frying, by holding the steam inside the product and creating
large cells, that contributes to a considerably spongy texture. In *ata*,
the gas could not be easily retained by the matrix, due to both the lack
of a viscoelastic gluten network and the scarce ability of the starchy
fraction of cowpea flour to produce a highly viscous paste. These two
conditions together caused the reduced porosity observed in *ata*.

The different crumb structure of the two types of fritters
impacted their texture (Table 3), with denser structure corresponding
to harder consistency. Hallén, İbanoğlu, and Ainsworth (2004)
reported that even a partial substitution of wheat flour by cowpea
flour is responsible, in bread making, for a worsening of the dough
characteristics due to the absence of gluten. The dough becomes
sticky and less able to retain air, resulting in harder and more compact
bread. The production of batter, instead, as in these fritters, which tol-
erates the absence of gluten better than a more consistent dough,
smoothed the textural differences between *ata* and *popizza* explaining
the lack of statistical significance for many of the parameters
measured.

Regarding oil uptake, it is known that during frying water migrates
from the center to the surface of food and then evaporates, leading to
the formation of voids and capillary pathways that cause the adhesion
of oil. After frying, the temperature decreases and the absorbed oil
tends to migrate from the surface to the center of the product, due to
a vacuum effect caused by steam condensation (Gamble & Rice,
1987). Oil absorption is related to pore radius, with smaller pores
causing higher capillary pressure and then higher oil uptake (Moreira,
Sun, & Chen, 1997). *Ata* fritters showed a more finely porous crumb
structure than *popizza*, and this explains why *ata* absorbed more frying
oil. Also gluten plays a role (Gazmuri & Bouchon, 2009), because after
thermal denaturation, it contributes in creating a compact external
layer, reducing the oil uptake of *popizza*. Together with the above

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 2** Inner surface of *popizza* (a) and *ata* (b) fritters. A section of 25 × 25 mm has been processed. Original tiff image (left); threshold image (center); outlined cells (right) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]</figcaption></figure>
reported less porous structure (Figure 2), the high oil uptake had a fur-
ther detrimental effect on the specific volume of ata, which was sig-
nificantly lower than in popizza.

5 | CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of the physicochemical properties of ata and popizza and their raw flours showed that, despite ata fritters are gluten free, they showed good textural properties, not significantly different compared with those of the gluten-containing Italian popizza. Therefore, ata is a well-structured street food suitable for people with coeliac disease. However, the high oil content of these fritters, particularly that of ata, undermines a daily consumption.

Food, and in particular, the street food, can be a vehicle for shar-
ing culture and traditions, which are strongly related to food. A strong
linkage, in fact, exists between food, culture, and locality.

The obtained results could help establishing a quality record of
these little studied minor productions. In particular, the findings could
represent a first step towards a better knowledge of these products
also outside their area of origin, as a vehicle of local culture and with
potential further positive effects on local economy. To enhance the
production of cowpea in a food sovereignty perspective could be the
basis for achieving food security.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr Danila Di Rella, University of Bari, Italy, for the
skillful technical assistance in performing the analyses. This research
has been performed within the project "LEgume GEnetic REsources as
a tool for the development of innovative and sustainable food TEchn-
nological system" supported under the "Thought for Food" Initiative
by Agropolis Fondation (through the "Investissements d'avenir" pro-
gramme with Reference ANR-10-LABX-0001-01"), Fondazione
Cariplo, and Daniel and Nina Carasso Foundation. This research is a
collaborative activity with another "Thought for Food" Initiative pro-
ject entitled "Increasing COwpea value chain sustainability in West
Africa through Product and procEss innovation."

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.

ORCID

Antonella Pasqualone ID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-2203

REFERENCES

AACC (2000). AACC International approved methods of analysis (10th ed.). St Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists.

Adebooye, O. C., & Singh, V. (2007). Effect of cooking on the profile of phenolics, tannins, phytate, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral

nutrients of whole-grain and decorticated vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). *Journal of Food Quality*, *30*, 1101-1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00155.x

Adebooye, O. C., & Singh, V. (2008). Physico-chemical properties of the flours and starches of two cowpea varieties (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). *Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies*, *9*, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2007.06.003

Adjei-Fremah, S., Jackai, L. E., & Worku, M. (2015). Analysis of phenolic content and antioxidant properties of selected cowpea varieties tested in bovine peripheral blood. *American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences*, *10*, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2015.235.245

Agazounon, C., Coulibaly, O., & Houndekon, V. (2004). Analyse de cowpea processing techniques into "atta" in Bénin. *Bulletin de la Recherche Agronomique du Bénin*, **45**, 1-8.

Akubor, P. I. (2003). Functional properties and performance of cowpea/ plantain/wheat flour blends in biscuits. *Plant Foods for Human Nutrition*, **58**, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAL.0000041154.09382.d8

Antova, G. A., Stoilova, T. D., & Ivanova, M. M. (2014). Proximate and lipid composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) cultivated in Bulgaria. *Journal of Food Composition and Analysis*, *33*, 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.12.005

AOAC (2006). *Official methods of analysis* (18th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

AOCS (1993). *Official methods and recommended practices of the American Oil Chemists Society* (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: American Oil Chemists Society Press.

Appiah, F., Asibuo, J. Y., & Kumah, P. (2011). Physicochemical and func-
tional properties of bean flours of three cowpea (Vigna unguiculata
L. Walp) varieties in Ghana. *African Journal of Food Science*, **5**,
100-104.

Attenburrow, G., Barnes, D. J., Davies, A. P., & Ingman, S. J. (1990). Rheo-
logical properties of wheat gluten. *Journal of Cereal Science*, **12**, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-5210(09)80152-5

Baum, S. J., Kris-Etherton, P. M., Willett, W. C., Lichtenstein, A. H., Rudel, L. L., Maki, K. C., ... Block, R. C. (2012). Fatty acids in cardiovascular health and disease: A comprehensive update. *Journal of Clinical Lipidology*, *6*, 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2012.04.077

Caponio, F., Summo, C., Pasqualone, A., Paradiso, V. M., & Gomes, T. (2009). Influence of processing and storage time on the lipidic fraction of taralli. *Journal of Food Science*, *74*, C701-C706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01357.x

Caprioli, G., Giusti, F., Ballini, R., Sagratini, G., Vila-Donat, P., Vittori, S., & Fiorini, D. (2016). Lipid nutritional value of legumes: Evaluation of different extraction methods and determination of fatty acid composition. *Food Chemistry*, *192*, 965-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.102

Carvalho, A. F. U., de Sousa, N. M., Farias, D. F., da Rocha-Bezerra, L. C. B., da Silva, R. M. P., Viana, M. P., ... Filho, F. R. F. (2012). Nutritional ranking of 30 Brazilian genotypes of cowpeas including determination of antioxidant capacity and vitamins. *Journal of Food Composition and Analysis*, *26*, 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.01.005

Desikachar, H. S. R. (1980). Development of weaning foods with high calo-
ric density and low hot-paste viscosity using traditional technologies.
*Food and Nutrition Bulletin*, **2**, 21-23.

Dovlo, F. E., Williams, C. E., & Zoaka, L. (1976). Cowpeas. Home preparation and use in West Africa (pp. 29-30). Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.

Du, S. K., Jiang, H., Yu, X., & Jane, J. L. (2014). Physicochemical and functional properties of whole legume flour. *LWT-Food Science and Technology*, *55*, 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.06.001

Farrand, E. A. (1964). Flour properties in relation to the modern bread pro-
cesses in the United Kingdom, with special reference to alpha-amylase
and starch damage. *Cereal Chemistry*, **41**, 98-111.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017). Data of crops production. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC accessed on October, 7, 2019.

Gamble, M. H., & Rice, P. (1987). Effect of pre-fry drying of oil uptake and distribution in potato crisp manufacture. *International Journal of Food Science & Technology*, 22, 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb00519.x

Gazmuri, A. M., & Bouchon, P. (2009). Analysis of wheat gluten and starch matrices during deep-fat frying. *Food Chemistry*, 115, 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.020

Gómez, C. (2003). *Cowpea: Post-harvest operations in developing countries*. Managua, Nicaragua: FAO.

Gutiérrez-Uribe, J. A., Romo-Lopez, I., & Serna-Saldívar, S. O. (2011). Phenolic composition and mammary cancer cell inhibition of extracts of whole cowpeas (*Vigna unguiculata*) and its anatomical parts. *Journal of Functional Foods*, 3, 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011.05.004

Hallén, E., İbanoğlu, Ş., & Ainsworth, P. (2004). Effect of fermented/-germinated cowpea flour addition on the rheological and baking properties of wheat flour. *Journal of Food Engineering*, 63, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00298-X

Hernández, L., Afonso, D., Rodríguez, E. M., & Díaz, C. (2011). Phenolic compounds in wheat grain cultivars. *Plant Foods for Human Nutrition*, 66, 408-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-011-0261-1

Ihediohanma, N. C., Ofoedu, C. E., Ojimba, N. C., Okafor, D. C., & Adedokun, A. O. (2014). Comparative effect of milling methods on the proximate composition and functional properties of cowpea (*Vigna unguiculata*). *International Journal of Life Sciences*, 3, 170-177.

Italian Presidential Decree (2001). DPR 187/2001. Regolamento per la revisione della normativa sulla produzione e commercializzazione di sfarinati e paste alimentari, a norma dell'articolo 50 della legge 22 febbraio 1994, 146. *Italian Official Journal*, 117, 6-12.

Jayathilake, C., Visvanathan, R., Deen, A., Bangamuwage, R., Jayawardana, B. C., Nammi, S., & Liyanage, R. (2018). Cowpea: An overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits. *Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture*, 98, 4793-4806. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9074

Kerr, W. L., Ward, C. D. W., McWatters, K. H., & Resurreccion, A. V. A. (2000). Effect of milling and particle size on functionality and physico-chemical properties of cowpea flour. *Cereal Chemistry*, 77, 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2000.77.2.213

Kethireddipalli, P., Hung, Y. C., McWatters, K. H., & Phillips, R. D. (2002). Effect of milling method (wet and dry) on the functional properties of cowpea (*Vigna unguiculata*) pastes and end product (akara) quality. *Journal of Food Science*, 67, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11357.x

Khalid, I. I., & Elharadallou, S. B. (2013). Functional properties of cowpea (*Vigna unguiculata* L. Walp), and lupin (*Lupinus termis*) flour and protein isolates. *Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences*, 3, 232-240. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000234

Khalid, I. I., Elhardallou, S. B., & Elkhalifa, E. A. (2012). Composition and functional properties of cowpea (*Vigna unguiculata* L. Walp) flour and protein isolates. *American Journal of Food Technology*, 7, 113-122. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2012.113.122

Kumar, S., & Saini, C. S. (2016). Study of various characteristics of composite flour prepared from the blend of wheat flour and gorgon nut flour. *International Journal of Agriculture, Environment & Biotechnology*, 9, 679-689. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00089.9

Madodé, Y. E., Houssou, P. A., Linnemann, A. R., Hounhouigan, D. J., Nout, M. J. R., & Van Boekel, M. A. J. S. (2011). Preparation, consumption, and nutritional composition of West African cowpea dishes. *Ecology of Food and Nutrition*, 50, 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2011.552371

Madodé, Y. E., Linnemann, A. R., Nout, M. J., Vosman, B., Hounhouigan, D. J., & van Boekel, M. A. (2012). Nutrients,

technological properties and genetic relationships among twenty cowpea landraces cultivated in West Africa. *International Journal of Food Science & Technology*, 47, 2636-2647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03146.x

Mariotti, M., Zardi, M., Lucisano, M., & Pagani, M. A. (2005). Influence of the heating rate on the pasting properties of various flours. *Starch-Stärke*, 57, 564-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200500425

Masure, H. G., Wouters, A. G., Fierens, E., & Delcour, J. A. (2019). Electrical resistance oven baking as a tool to study crumb structure formation in gluten-free bread. *Food Research International*, 116, 925-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.029

Moreira, R. G., Sun, X., & Chen, Y. (1997). Factors affecting oil uptake in tortilla chips in deep-fat frying. *Journal of Food Engineering*, 31, 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(96)00088-X

Okojie, P. W., & Isah, E. C. (2014). Sanitary conditions of food vending sites and food handling practices of street food vendors in Benin City, Nigeria: Implication for food hygiene and safety. *Journal of Environmental and Public Health*, Article ID 701316, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/701316

Pasqualone, A., Bianco, A. M., Paradiso, V. M., Summo, C., Gambacorta, G., Caponio, F., & Blanco, A. (2015). Production and characterization of functional biscuits obtained from purple wheat. *Food Chemistry*, 180, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.025

Pasqualone, A., Caponio, F., Summo, C., Paradiso, V. M., Bottega, G., & Pagani, M. A. (2010). Gluten-free bread making trials from cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) flour and sensory evaluation of the final product. *International Journal of Food Properties*, 13, 562-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910802713172

Pasqualone, A., Paradiso, V. M., Summo, C., Caponio, F., & Gomes, T. (2014). Influence of drying conditions on volatile compounds of pasta. *Food and Bioprocess Technology*, 7, 719-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-013-1080-1

Patterson, S. P., Phillips, R. D., McWatters, K. H., Hung, Y. C., & Chinnan, M. S. (2004). Fat reduction affects quality of akara (fried cowpea paste). *International Journal of Food Science & Technology*, 39, 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00827.x

Prinyawiwatkul, W., McWatters, K. H., Beuchat, L. R., & Phillips, R. D. (1994). Physical properties of cowpea paste and akara as affected by supplementation with peanut flour. *Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry*, 42, 1750-1756. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00044a034

Rane, S. (2011). Street vended food in developing world: Hazard analyses. *Indian Journal of Microbiology*, 51, 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0154-x

Rivas-Vega, M. E., Goytortúa-Bores, E., Ezquerra-Brauer, J. M., Salazar-García, M. G., Cruz-Suárez, L. E., Nolasco, H., & Civera-Cerecedo, R. (2006). Nutritional value of cowpea (*Vigna unguiculata* L. Walp) meals as ingredients in diets for Pacific white shrimp (*Litopenaeus vannamei* Boone). *Food Chemistry*, 97, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.021

Scheuer, P. M., Mattioni, B., Barreto, P. L. M., Montenegro, F. M., Gomes-Ruffi, C. R., Biondi, S., ... Francisco, A. D. (2014). Effects of fat replacement on properties of whole wheat bread. *Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences*, 50, 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502014000400005

Shih, F., & Daigle, K. (1999). Oil uptake properties of fried batters from rice flour. *Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry*, 47, 1611-1615. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980688n

Summo, C., De Angelis, D., Ricciardi, L., Caponio, F., Lotti, C., Pavan, S., & Pasqualone, A. (2019a). Data on the chemical composition, bioactive compounds, fatty acid composition, physico-chemical and functional properties of a global chickpea collection. *Data in Brief*, 27, article ID 104612, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104612
Summo, C., De Angelis, D., Ricciardi, L., Caponio, F., Lotti, C., Pavan, S., & Pasqualone, A. (2019b). Nutritional, physico-chemical and functional characterization of a global chickpea collection. *Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 84*, article ID 103306, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103306

Trabace, R. (2015). Cozze e cicorie, polpi e popizze, orecchiette e friseddhre, la top ten dei sapori di Puglia. Corriere del Mezzogiorno. https://corrieredelmezzogiorno.corriere.it/bari/arte_e_cultura/cards/cozze-cicorie-polpi-popizze-orecchiette-friseddhre-top-ten-sapori-puglia/popizze-sgagliozze.shtml Accessed on March, 30, 2019.

Zhang, H., & Tsao, R. (2016). Dietary polyphenols, oxidative stress and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. *Current Opinion in Food Science, 8*, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.02.002

**How to cite this article:** De Angelis D, Madodé YE, Briffaz A, Hounhouigan DJ, Pasqualone A, Summo C. Comparing the quality of two traditional fried street foods from the raw material to the end product: The Beninese cowpea-based *ata* and the Italian wheat-based *popizza*. *Legume Science*. 2020; e35. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.35