# Flu RNA Vaccine: A Game Changer?

François Meurens

► To cite this version:

François Meurens. Flu RNA Vaccine: A Game Changer?. Vaccines, 2020, 8 (4), pp.760. 10.3390/vaccines8040760. hal-03126859

HAL Id: hal-03126859

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03126859v1

Submitted on 13 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## Editorial

# Flu RNA Vaccine: A Game Changer?

François Meurens

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

INRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France; francois.meurens@oniris-nantes.fr; Tel.: +33-2-40-68-77-02

Received: 27 November 2020; Accepted: 10 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

Influenza virus infection is a major One Health concern worldwide. Indeed, *Orthomyxoviridae* and more specifically *Alphainfluenzavirus* and *Betainfluenzavirus* are responsible for flu disease, which is mostly associated with respiratory and systemic clinical signs in various species including humans, pigs, horses, ferrets and birds [1]. Zoonoses involving influenza virus strains are common, and even clear evidence of bidirectional human-swine transmission has been reported [2]. A large-scale use of therapeutic approaches—such as oseltamivir phosphate, zanamivir, and newer drugs such as baloxavir marboxil—is not possible and could favor the emergence of antiviral drug resistances, the first line of defense against influenza viruses remains to be the vaccination of the exposed populations. However, vaccination against influenza viruses still presents several drawbacks, the main ones being a relatively low effectiveness and strain mismatches. Currently available vaccines in humans are 40–60% effective and offer poor protection or no protection against other strains, especially if they are from a different subtype of influenza virus [3–8]. Thus, there is undoubtedly room for improvement in the challenging world of flu vaccines.

A growing interest has been shown for a new generation of vaccination approaches using nucleic acids such as DNA or RNA. However, because of their suboptimal potency in early clinical studies [9] and the low but persistent risk of the integration of DNA sequences into the host genome [10], DNA vaccines failed to emerge in human medicine, although a limited number of vaccines reached the market in veterinary medicine [11] (West-Nile Innovator® DNA, Oncept® Canine Melanoma Vaccine and Elanco's Clynav® vaccine to control salmon pancreas disease). On the contrary, mRNA vaccines which were not initially actively developed due to important concerns regarding their low stability, gained considerable interest due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, and are currently close to the market in human medicine. In 2020, many interesting and comprehensive reviews [12–14] and original papers [15–19] summarizing the current knowledge on RNA vaccines and presenting some major breakthroughs in their development were published. RNA vaccines have never been so close to the market, and we can reasonably expect to see at least a first one against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection available by the end of the year, and the beginning of 2021. Indeed, two RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are currently terminating phase 3 clinical trial with some preliminary reports already published [16,17,19] and many other ones are following. With these new vaccines available soon, there is no doubt we will soon see more RNA vaccines, designed to prevent or even treat various medical conditions, including cancer, on the market. Specifically regarding flu vaccines, one of the biotech company involved in the race for the development of an effective RNA vaccine to prevent COVID-19 had already announced their intention to enter the seasonal flu market given the high medical need for more effective flu vaccines. The interest of RNA vaccines for flu vaccination has also been comprehensively reviewed [20]. Vaccination against influenza viruses faces multiple important challenges that need to be resolved to bring universal and more effective vaccines onto the market [20]. Amongst the commonly described challenges are: (1) the lack of protection of current vaccine formulations against antigenic drift and shift—the two main mechanisms of evolution in Orthomyxoviruses; (2) the short-lived immune response after vaccination; (3) the sometimes weak immune antibody response resulting from pre-existing immunity;
(4) potential adverse effects of live attenuated vaccines when they are used; (5) the interference of maternally-derived antibodies (MDA) with the induction of a protective immune response in infants; (6) the common use of adjuvants, especially for inactivated vaccines, not always very well-accepted by the population. Based on the current research, RNA vaccines developed against flu could broadly induce protective immune responses and could overcome some of the issues mentioned above [20,21]. Antigenic drift—RNA segment reassortment resulting from coinfection events—is a major concern for health authorities because it can cause the rapid emergence of potentially pandemic influenza viruses [1,22]. This is why the circulation of influenza viruses between their wild bird reservoirs and some mammalian hosts such as pigs which can act as “mixing vessels” [23] is closely monitored [22]. In the case of emergence, there is an absolute need for the fast development of effective vaccines widely available for the exposed populations. Two of the main advantages of RNA vaccines are that they can be easily updated once the genome sequence of the emerging influenza virus strain has been accurately identified, and they do not require toxic materials or cell cultures that could be contaminated with viruses. Besides these two major advantages, they do not require the systematic use of adjuvants, they do not exhibit any risk of reversion to virulence unlike many attenuated vaccines, and they commonly elicit well-balanced—humoral and cellular—immune responses. Regarding the contemporary drawbacks, a few can be identified. The main one is still the relatively low stability of the RNA—even though progress has been made—and the need for freezer conditions for the distribution and the administration, RNA being more likely to break apart above freezing temperatures [24]. Another limitation is the potential negative impact of type 1 and 3 interferons induced in response to vaccine RNA molecules on antigen expression [24]. Then, even if the risk of genomic integration is widely considered as null and is not a biosafety concern, eukaryotic cells have been shown to be able to provide, to some extent, reverse transcription activity [25–28]. Further research on that eukaryotic reverse transcription activity, in the context of RNA vaccination, might be of interest for the scientific community [14].

Until now, in vitro transcribed (IVT) messenger RNA (mRNA) influenza virus vaccines were among the most studied RNA vaccines developed against infectious diseases in humans and animals. Two main types of mRNA vaccines have been developed against influenza virus infection: the non-replicating mRNA vaccines and the self-amplifying mRNA vaccines [20], with possibly different types of RNA (prokaryotic, eukaryotic and transfer RNA amongst others) [29]. Both approaches are in the pipelines of the three current major players in the field of RNA vaccines: Moderna Therapeutics (Cambridge, MA, USA) [30], EpiVax (Providence, RI, USA) and CureVac AG (Tübingen, Germany). Moderna, is working on a non-replicating mRNA vaccine with modified nucleosides incorporated associated to lipid nanoparticles (LNP) while CureVac AG, chose a strategy based on sequence-optimized unmodified mRNA–LNP. The EpiVax vaccine which targets highly pathogenic H7N9 subtype influenza virus is currently in phase 1 clinical trial. The impressive acceleration of RNA vaccine research caused by COVID-19 will probably continue to push forward the development of influenza virus RNA vaccines in the coming years. Besides RNA vaccines against flu and COVID-19, many others against rabies [31,32], Zika [33,34], Chikungunya [35], and other pathogens [20] are also in the pipeline at various stages of development.

Data about RNA vaccines are now accumulating very quickly and the first RNA vaccines have been released in the UK on December 2020 (and several countries are following). Are they going to be as effective and as convenient in their use than their competitors based on different approaches (see for instance [36]) sometimes also very innovative and attractive? Will they bring enough advantages compared to other vaccines to be considered as real game changers? We currently—December 2020—still do not know, but we will for sure very soon. It is just a question of time.

**Acknowledgments:** I thank Fanny Renois (Oniris) for the careful reading of the manuscript.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The author declares no conflict of interest.
References

1. Wright, P.F.; Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y. Orthomyxoviridae. In *Fields Virology*, 6th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 1146–1243.

2. Chastagner, A.; Enouf, V.; Peroz, D.; Hervé, S.; Lucas, P.; Quéguiner, S.; Gorin, S.; Beven, V.; Behillil, S.; Leneveu, P.; et al. Bidirectional Human–Swine Transmission of Seasonal Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Virus in Pig Herd, France, 2018. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2019**, *25*, 1940–1943. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Jackson, M.L.; Chung, J.R.; Jackson, L.A.; Phillips, C.H.; Benoit, J.; Monto, A.S.; Martin, E.T.; Belongia, E.A.; McLean, H.Q.; Gaglani, M.; et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States during the 2015–2016 Season. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2017**, *377*, 534–543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Belongia, E.A.; Kieke, B.A.; Donahue, J.G.; Greenlee, R.T.; Balish, A.; Foust, A.; Lindstrom, S.; Shay, D.K. Marshfield Influenza Study Group Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines varied substantially with antigenic match from the 2004–2005 season to the 2006–2007 season. *J. Infect. Dis.* **2009**, *199*, 159–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Belongia, E.A.; Kieke, B.A.; Donahue, J.G.; Coleman, L.A.; Irving, S.A.; Meece, J.K.; Vandermause, M.; Lindstrom, S.; Gargiullo, P.; Shay, D.K. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in Wisconsin during the 2007–2008 season: Comparison of interim and final results. *Vaccine* **2011**, *29*, 6558–6563. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Ferdinands, J.M.; Gaglani, M.; Martin, E.T.; Middleton, D.; Monto, A.S.; Murthy, K.; Silveira, F.P.; Talbot, H.K.; Zimmerman, R.; Alyanak, E.; et al. Prevention of Influenza Hospitalization Among Adults in the United States, 2015–2016: Results from the US Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (HAIVEN). *J. Infect. Dis.* **2019**, *220*, 1265–1275. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. McLean, H.Q.; Thompson, M.G.; Sundaram, M.E.; Kieke, B.A.; Gaglani, M.; Murthy, K.; Piedra, P.A.; Zimmerman, R.K.; Nowalk, M.P.; Raviotta, J.M.; et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During 2012–2013: Variable Protection by Age and Virus Type. *J. Infect. Dis.* **2015**, *211*, 1529–1540. [CrossRef]

8. Ohmit, S.E.; Thompson, M.G.; Petrie, J.G.; Thaker, S.N.; Jackson, M.L.; Belongia, E.A.; Zimmerman, R.K.; Gaglani, M.; Lamerato, L.; Spencer, S.M.; et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the 2011–2012 season: Protection against each circulating virus and the effect of prior vaccination on estimates. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* **2014**, *58*, 319–327. [CrossRef]

9. Kutzler, M.A.; Weiner, D.B. DNA vaccines: Ready for prime time? *Nat. Rev. Genet.* **2008**, *9*, 776–788. [CrossRef]

10. Geall, A.J.; Mandl, C.W.; Ulmer, J.B. RNA: The new revolution in nucleic acid vaccines. *Semin. Immunol.* **2013**, *25*, 152–159. [CrossRef]

11. Redding, L.; Weiner, D.B. DNA vaccines in veterinary use. *Expert. Rev. Vaccines* **2009**, *8*, 1251–1276. [CrossRef]

12. Pardi, N.; Hogan, M.J.; Weissman, D. Recent advances in mRNA vaccine technology. *Curr. Opin. Immunol.* **2020**, *65*, 14–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Bloom, K.; van den Berg, F.; Arbuthnot, P. Self-amplifying RNA vaccines for infectious diseases. *Gene Ther.* **2020**. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Cimolai, N. Do RNA vaccines obviate the need for genotoxicity studies? *Mutagenesis* **2020**. [CrossRef]

15. Laczkó, D.; Hogan, M.J.; Toulmin, S.A.; Hicks, P.; Lederer, K.; Gaudette, B.T.; Castaño, D.; Amanat, F.; Muramatsu, H.; Oguin, T.H.; et al. A Single Immunization with Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Elicits Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice. *Immunity* **2020**, *53*, 724–732.e7. [CrossRef]

16. Mulligan, M.J.; Lyke, K.E.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Neuzil, K.; Raabe, V.; Bailey, R.; Swanson, K.A.; et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. *Nature* **2020**, *586*, 589–593. [CrossRef]

17. Jackson, L.A.; Anderson, E.J.; Rouphael, N.G.; Roberts, P.C.; Makhene, M.; Coler, R.N.; McCullough, M.P.; Chappell, J.D.; Denison, M.R.; Stevens, L.J.; et al. An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—Preliminary Report. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2020**, *383*, 1920–1931. [CrossRef]

18. Walsh, E.E.; Frenck, R.W.; Falsey, A.R.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Neuzil, K.; Mulligan, M.J.; Bailey, R.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2020**. [CrossRef]

19. Anderson, E.J.; Rouphael, N.G.; Widge, A.T.; Jackson, L.A.; Roberts, P.C.; Makhene, M.; Chappell, J.D.; Denison, M.R.; Stevens, L.J.; Pruijssers, A.J.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Older Adults. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2020**. [CrossRef]
20. Scorza, F.B.; Pardi, N. New Kids on the Block: RNA-Based Influenza Virus Vaccines. *Vaccines* **2018**, *6*, 20.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

21. Zhuang, X.; Qi, Y.; Wang, M.; Yu, N.; Nan, F.; Zhang, H.; Tian, M.; Li, C.; Lu, H.; Jin, N. mRNA Vaccines Encoding the HA Protein of Influenza A H1N1 Virus Delivered by Cationic Lipid Nanoparticles Induce Protective Immune Responses in Mice. *Vaccines* **2020**, *8*, 123. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Morse, S.S.; Mazet, J.A.K.; Woolhouse, M.; Parrish, C.R.; Carroll, D.; Karesh, W.B.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C.; Lipkin, W.I.; Daszak, P. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. *Lancet* **2012**, *380*, 1956–1965. [CrossRef]

23. Ma, W.; Kahn, R.E.; Richt, J.A. The pig as a mixing vessel for influenza viruses: Human and veterinary implications. *J. Mol. Genet. Med.* **2008**, *3*, 158–166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Zhang, C.; Maruggi, G.; Shan, H.; Li, J. Advances in mRNA Vaccines for Infectious Diseases. *Front. Immunol.* **2019**, *10*, 594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. Järäs, M.; Edqvist, A.; Rebetz, J.; Salford, L.G.; Widegren, B.; Fan, X. Human short-term repopulating cells have enhanced telomerase reverse transcriptase expression. *Blood* **2006**, *108*, 1084–1091. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26. Su, Y.; Ghodke, P.P.; Egli, M.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Guengerich, F.P. Human DNA polymerase η has reverse transcriptase activity in cellular environments. *J. Biol. Chem.* **2019**, *294*, 6073–6081. [CrossRef]

27. Schwertz, H.; Rowley, J.W.; Schumann, G.G.; Thorack, U.; Campbell, R.A.; Manne, B.K.; Zimmerman, G.A.; Weyrich, A.S.; Rondina, M.T. Endogenous LINE-1 (Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1) Reverse Transcriptase Activity in Platelets Controls Translational Events through RNA-DNA Hybrids. *Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.* **2018**, *38*, 801–815. [CrossRef]

28. Shimizu, A.; Nakatani, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Jinno-Oue, A.; Ishikawa, O.; Boeke, J.D.; Takeuchi, Y.; Hoshino, H. Characterisation of cytoplasmic DNA complementary to non-retroviral RNA viruses in human cells. *Sci. Rep.* **2014**, *4*, 5074. [CrossRef]

29. Gomes, A.C.; Roesti, E.S.; El-Turabi, A.; Bachmann, M.F. Type of RNA Packed in VLPs Impacts IgG Class Switching-Implications for an Influenza Vaccine Design. *Vaccines* **2019**, *7*, 47. [CrossRef]

30. Feldman, R.A.; Fuhr, R.; Smolenov, I.; Ribeiro, A.M.; Panther, L.; Watson, M.; Senn, J.J.; Smith, M.; Almarsson, Ö.; Pujar, H.S.; et al. mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses of pandemic potential are immunogenic and well tolerated in healthy adults in phase 1 randomized clinical trials. *Vaccine* **2019**, *37*, 3326–3334. [CrossRef]

31. Armbruster, N.; Jasny, E.; Petsch, B. Advances in RNA Vaccines for Preventive Indications: A Case Study of a Vaccine against Rabies. *Vaccines* **2019**, *7*, 132. [CrossRef]

32. Alberer, M.; Gnad-Vogt, U.; Hong, H.S.; Mehr, K.T.; Backert, L.; Finak, G.; Gottardo, R.; Bica, M.A.; Garofano, A.; Koch, S.D.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a mRNA rabies vaccine in healthy adults: An open-label, non-randomised, prospective, first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. *Lancet* **2017**, *390*, 1511–1520. [CrossRef]

33. Richner, J.M.; Himansu, S.; Dowd, K.A.; Butler, S.; Salazar, V.; Fox, J.M.; Julander, J.G.; Tang, W.W.; Shresta, S.; Pierson, T.C.; et al. Modified mRNA vaccines protect against Zika virus infection. *Cell* **2017**, *168*, 1114–1125.e10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Zhong, Z.; Portela Catani, J.P.; Mc Cafferty, S.; Couck, L.; Van Den Broeck, W.; Gorlé, N.; Vandenbroucke, R.E.; Devriendt, B.; Ulbert, S.; Cnops, L.; et al. Immunogenicity and Protection Efficacy of a Naked Self-Replicating mRNA-Based Zika Virus Vaccine. *Vaccines* **2019**, *7*, 96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Gao, S.; Song, S.; Zhang, L. Recent Progress in Vaccine Development against Chikungunya Virus. *Front. Microbiol.* **2019**, *10*. [CrossRef]

36. Nachbagauer, R.; Feser, J.; Naficy, A.; Bernstein, D.I.; Guptill, J.; Walter, E.B.; Berlanda-Scorza, F.; Stadlbauer, D.; Wilson, P.C.; Aydillo, T.; et al. A chimeric hemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine approach induces broad and long-lasting immunity in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial. *Nat. Med.* **2020**, 1–9. [CrossRef]

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<footnote>**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</footnote>