CIRCULAR ECONOMY PRINCIPLES'
IMPLEMENTATION IN ELECTRONICS
MANUFACTURING: WASTE REDUCTION
STRATEGIES IN CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT

Udu Chukwudi Emeka, Charles Okpala, Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe

► To cite this version:

Udu Chukwudi Emeka, Charles Okpala, Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe. CIRCULAR ECONOMY PRINCIPLES' IMPLEMENTATION IN ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING: WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT. International journal of industrial and production engineering, 2025, 3 (2), pp.29-42. hal-05063126

HAL Id: hal-05063126

https://hal.science/hal-05063126v1

Submitted on 12 May 2025

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

CIRCULAR ECONOMY PRINCIPLES' IMPLEMENTATION IN ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING: WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT

¹Udu Chukwudi Emeka, ²Okpala Charles Chikwendu and ³Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe

1,2,3Industrial/Production Engineering Department,
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B. 5025 Awka,
Anambra State - Nigeria

Emails: chydoskemy@yahoo.com, cc.okpala@unizik.edu.ng, co.nwamekwe@unizik.edu.ng

ABSTRACT

The growing emphasis on sustainable manufacturing has driven the need for effective waste reduction strategies in chemical management within the electronics industry. This study explores the application of circular economy principles to minimize chemical waste and enhance resource efficiency. Key strategies examined include green chemistry innovations, closed-loop recycling systems, material substitution, and waste valorization. Additionally, the research investigates regulatory frameworks and industry best practices that support the shift from a linear to a circular chemical management model. A thorough review of existing literature and case studies provides insights into successful waste reduction initiatives implemented by leading electronics manufacturers. The study also highlights the role of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, in optimizing chemical inventory management and tracking hazardous substances. The economic and environmental benefits of circular economy strategies including cost savings, a reduced environmental footprint, and improved regulatory compliance are critically assessed. Challenges such as supply chain complexities, high initial investment costs, and technological barriers are analyzed alongside potential solutions, including stakeholder collaboration, policy incentives, and the integration of eco-design principles. By synthesizing best practices and emerging trends, this research offers valuable insights for industry stakeholders, policymakers, and researchers that are seeking to develop and implement effective waste reduction strategies in alignment with circular economy principles.

**Keywords:** waste reduction, circular economy, electronics manufacturing, sustainability, resource optimization, green chemistry

1. Introduction

The electronics manufacturing industry serves as a driving force behind technological innovation and economic growth worldwide. However, this sector faces increasing environmental challenges due to its high consumption of raw materials and the generation of
hazardous chemical waste. As production scales up to meet growing market demand, the effective management of these chemicals has become a critical concern, not only to mitigate environmental and public health risks but also to address the rising costs of waste treatment and regulatory compliance (Digitemie et al., 2025). Traditionally, the industry has operated under a linear “take-make-dispose” model, prioritizing production efficiency over sustainability. This approach often results in excessive waste and inefficient resource utilization.

In contrast, Circular Economy (CE) principles present a transformative solution by promoting continuous reuse, recycling, and repurposing of materials, thereby creating closed-loop systems that reduce environmental impacts while driving sustainable economic growth (Adebayo et al., 2024; Nowak-Marchewka et al., 2025). According to Nwamekwe and Okpala (2025), The CE paradigm is increasingly recognized as an important framework for sustainable industrial engineering, which emphasizes resource efficiency through reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing. They explained that this approach contrasts sharply with the traditional linear model of production, which often leads to significant waste and environmental degradation. For example, Adebayo et al. (2024), highlighted how industries such as oil and gas have successfully implemented advanced recycling techniques to recover and repurpose by-products like flared gases and drilling fluids, demonstrating the potential for similar waste reduction strategies in electronics manufacturing.

Integrating circular economy principles into chemical management strategies offers a viable pathway for addressing environmental concerns in electronics manufacturing. This approach focuses on minimizing hazardous by-products and rethinking the entire lifecycle of chemical inputs—from sourcing and usage to disposal or repurposing (Nwamekwe and Nwabunwanne, 2025). Key strategies include process redesign, substituting hazardous chemicals with greener alternatives, and enhancing recycling techniques, all of which have been shown to promote sustainability within the industry (Digitemie et al., 2025). Additionally, adopting these strategies can improve both environmental performance and economic competitiveness, helping manufacturers to comply with stringent environmental regulations while gaining market advantages. However, the transition from traditional linear systems to circular models is fraught with challenges, including technical barriers, economic constraints, regulatory complexities, and the need for strong stakeholder collaboration (Rajčić et al., 2024; Gorokhova et al., 2024).

Furthermore, the complexity and variability of chemical waste streams in electronics manufacturing make it difficult to standardize waste reduction methods across the industry. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts from researchers, policymakers, and industry practitioners to develop scalable and practical strategies. This study aims to bridge the gap between theoretical circular economy frameworks and their real-world application in chemical waste reduction within electronics manufacturing. By critically analyzing current practices and exploring innovative solutions, the research seeks to provide actionable insights that can guide the industry toward a more sustainable and resource-efficient future, ultimately contributing to the broader discourse on sustainable manufacturing (Obiuto et al., 2024).
## 2. Circular Economy Principles in Chemical Management for Electronics Manufacturing

The transition toward a circular economy in chemical management is reshaping the electronics manufacturing industry by emphasizing resource efficiency, waste reduction, and material recovery. Key principles such as resource optimization, closed-loop recycling, sustainable substitutes, and eco-design play a crucial role in minimizing environmental impact while enhancing sustainability (Nwamekwe et al., 2024). Resource optimization ensures efficient chemical use through process improvements like real-time monitoring, automated control systems, and optimized reaction conditions, leading to reduced consumption, lower costs, and fewer hazardous by-products (Komyshev et al., 2024; Jamal, 2024).

Additionally, closed-loop recycling facilitates the recovery and reintegration of valuable chemicals used in electronics manufacturing, significantly decreasing reliance on virgin raw materials while mitigating environmental pollution through advanced separation and purification technologies (Dennison et al., 2024; Jamal, 2024). By implementing these strategies, manufacturers not only improve resource efficiency but also contribute to a cleaner and more cost-effective production process. Table 1 summarizes circular economy principles in chemical management for electronics manufacturing.

<table><caption>Table 1: CE principles and applications in electronics engineering</caption><thead><tr><td>Principle</td><td>Description</td><td>Application in Electronics Manufacturing</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Design for Reuse and Recycling</td><td>Prioritizing materials and components that can be reused or recycled.</td><td>Using modular components and recyclable polymers in Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs).</td></tr><tr><td>Substitution and Green Chemistry</td><td>Replacing hazardous chemicals with safer, sustainable alternatives.</td><td>Using bio-based solvents and lead-free soldering materials.</td></tr><tr><td>Closed-Loop Systems</td><td>Ensuring chemicals are recovered, purified, and reused in production.</td><td>Implementing solvent recovery systems for etching processes.</td></tr><tr><td>Waste Minimization</td><td>Reducing chemical waste through efficient usage and process optimization.</td><td>Implementing precise chemical dosing and lean manufacturing.</td></tr><tr><td>Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)</td><td>Manufacturers take responsibility for end-of-life product disposal.</td><td>Setting up take-back programs for circuit boards and batteries.</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain Transparency</td><td>Ensuring responsible sourcing and proper chemical management across suppliers.</td><td>Using blockchain for traceability of rare earth metals.</td></tr><tr><td>Energy and Resource Efficiency</td><td>Reducing energy and resource consumption in chemical processes.</td><td>Adopting water-based cleaning processes instead of solvent-based ones.</td></tr></tbody></table>

Incorporating sustainable substitutes and eco-design further strengthens the shift toward circular economy principles in electronics manufacturing. Green chemistry innovations, including bio-based materials and non-toxic solvent systems, provide safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals, aligning with regulatory standards while fostering a healthier production
environment (Stadelmann and Slootweg, 2024). Eco-design complements these efforts by integrating environmental considerations into product development, ensuring recyclability, reduced chemical waste, and easier material recovery at the end of a product's lifecycle (Sardana et al., 2024). Through Lifecycle Analysis (LCA), companies can proactively identify potential environmental impacts and address them at the design stage, embedding sustainability from inception. As environmental regulations become stricter and consumer demand for sustainable products grows, adopting these circular economy principles will be vital for balancing industrial growth with ecological responsibility.

## 2.1 Overview of Circular Economy Principles in Chemical Management

The implementation of circular economy principles in chemical management aims to minimize waste, enhance resource efficiency, and reduce environmental impact in electronics manufacturing. By shifting from a linear "take-make-dispose" model to a circular approach, manufacturers can adopt strategies such as waste prevention, material recovery, and sustainable chemical substitution. Table 2 provides an overview of key circular economy principles, outlining their objectives, implementation strategies, and potential benefits in fostering a more sustainable and efficient chemical management system.

<table><caption>Table 2: Overview of Circular Economy Principles in Chemical Management</caption><thead><tr><td>Principle</td><td>Objective</td><td>Implementation Strategy</td><td>Key Benefits</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Waste Prevention</td><td>Reduce hazardous waste generation</td><td>Process optimization, lean manufacturing</td><td>Minimizes chemical use, reduces environmental footprint</td></tr><tr><td>Material Recovery</td><td>Reuse and recycle valuable chemicals</td><td>Closed-loop systems, solvent recovery, chemical regeneration</td><td>Lowers raw material costs, enhances sustainability</td></tr><tr><td>Sustainable Substitution</td><td>Replace hazardous substances with safer alternatives</td><td>Green chemistry, biodegradable and non-toxic materials</td><td>Improves safety, compliance, and environmental health</td></tr><tr><td>Digital Integration</td><td>Optimize chemical tracking and usage</td><td>AI, IoT, blockchain for monitoring and automation</td><td>Enhances efficiency, compliance, and real-time decision-making</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory Compliance</td><td>Ensure adherence to environmental standards</td><td>Compliance monitoring, industry collaboration</td><td>Reduces legal risks, improves market acceptance</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 2 presents five fundamental principles that drive sustainable chemical management in electronics manufacturing. Waste prevention aims to minimize hazardous waste at the source through process optimization and lean manufacturing, thereby reducing environmental impact and enhancing efficiency. Apart from wastes identification and subsequent elimination, lean manufacturing enables organizations to be more profitable, through the application of fewer resources to manufacture more quality products at a faster rate, thereby leading to competitive advantage and customer satisfaction (Okpala et al., 2020; Okpala and Egwuagu, 2016; Ihueze and Okpala, 2011). Material recovery focuses on reusing and recycling valuable chemicals using closed-loop systems and solvent recovery methods, thereby lowering dependency on virgin materials and cutting production costs. Sustainable substitution replaces hazardous
substances with safer, biodegradable alternatives through green chemistry innovations,
ensuring improved worker safety and regulatory compliance.

Digital integration leverages Artificial Intelligence (AI), IoT, and blockchain technologies for real-time tracking, automation, and decision-making, optimizing chemical usage while enhancing compliance and operational efficiency. While AI whose tasks encompass a wide range of activities such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding has emerged as a transformative force that revolutionizes various aspects of human life and industry (Okpala et al., 2025; Okpala and Okpala, 2024; Okpala et al., 2023), IoT has transformed manufacturing by providing improved connectivity, data exchange capabilities, and automation opportunities (Igbokwe et al, 2024; Okpala and Udu, 2025). Regulatory compliance ensures adherence to environmental standards such as RoHS and REACH, mitigating legal risks and strengthening market credibility. By incorporating these principles, electronics manufacturers can shift towards a circular economy model, fostering sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term resilience in chemical management while minimizing their environmental footprint.

**2.2: Conceptual Framework of Circular Economy in Chemical Management**

The conceptual framework of circular economy in chemical management illustrates the interconnected strategies that promote sustainability within electronics manufacturing. This framework highlights key principles such as waste prevention, material recovery, sustainable substitution, digital integration, and regulatory compliance. By visualizing these elements, Figure 1 demonstrates how manufacturers can transition from a linear to a circular model, optimizing resource utilization and minimizing environmental impact. The framework provides a structured approach to implementing circular economy principles effectively in chemical management.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1: Conceptual framework of circular economy in chemical management</figcaption></figure>

Figure 1 illustrates a structured framework for integrating circular economy principles into chemical management within electronics manufacturing. The model comprises five interconnected components: Waste Prevention, Material Recovery, Sustainable Substitution,
Digital Integration, and Regulatory Compliance. Waste Prevention focuses on minimizing hazardous waste through process optimization and lean manufacturing, reducing environmental impact. Material Recovery promotes reclaiming and reusing of chemicals via closed-loop systems and solvent recovery technologies, lowering dependence on virgin materials. Sustainable substitution involves replacing harmful substances with safer, biodegradable alternatives through green chemistry innovations, enhancing worker safety and regulatory compliance.

### 3. Strategic Waste Reduction in Chemical Management for Electronics Manufacturing

Effective waste reduction in chemical management within electronics manufacturing requires strategic interventions such as process optimization, chemical recycling, sustainable material substitution, and digital tools. These approaches align with circular economy principles by minimizing hazardous waste, enhancing resource efficiency, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Optimizing production processes through lean manufacturing eliminates non-value-adding activities, reducing excessive chemical use. The integration of automated chemical dispensing systems further improves dosing accuracy and minimizes waste. Additionally, predictive analytics enable real-time monitoring of chemical inventories, facilitating demand forecasting and supply chain adjustments to prevent overuse and unnecessary stockpiling (Rasu, 2024). Chemical recycling and reuse play a crucial role in circular economy practices, allowing the recovery and reintegration of chemicals into production. On-site recovery systems and supplier take-back programs ensure safe collection and reprocessing, reducing hazardous waste volumes and environmental impact. Advanced solvent recovery techniques, such as distillation and filtration, also extend the lifecycle of cleaning agents, optimizing resource utilization and lowering operational costs (Rasu, 2024).

The adoption of sustainable material substitutes is essential for reducing the environmental footprint of chemical usage in electronics manufacturing (Nwamekwe et al., 2024). The identification and integration of biodegradable or non-toxic alternatives minimize ecological harm without compromising product performance. Research in eco-friendly solvents and coatings has led to the development of innovative, environmentally responsible formulations. Additionally, enforcing stringent sustainability criteria for suppliers ensures that all inputs meet high environmental and safety standards, strengthening supply chain sustainability (Onukwulu et al., 2025; Basiru et al., 2025; Masudin et al., 2024).

Digital technologies are also transforming chemical management by enhancing monitoring, transparency, and operational control. AI-driven tracking systems provide real-time data on chemical usage and waste production, enabling proactive adjustments to minimize excess use. Blockchain technology enhances traceability and accountability across the supply chain, facilitating the tracking of chemical origins and usage patterns. Moreover, IoT-based sensors aid in the early detection of leaks and spills, significantly reducing environmental contamination risks and ensuring compliance with safety standards (Ezekwu, 2025).
**3.1: Flowchart of Waste Reduction Strategies in Electronics Manufacturing**

Figure 2 presents a flowchart outlining key waste reduction strategies in electronics manufacturing, following circular economy principles. It visually represents the step-by-step approach manufacturers can adopt to minimize waste, optimize resource utilization, and enhance sustainability. The flowchart highlights waste prevention, material recovery, sustainable substitution, process optimization, and digital integration as core strategies. By following this structured approach, manufacturers can systematically reduce hazardous waste, improve efficiency, and comply with environmental regulations while promoting a more sustainable production system.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Figure 2: Flowchart of waste reduction strategies in electronics manufacturing</figcaption></figure>

Figure 2 illustrates a structured approach to implementing waste reduction strategies in electronics manufacturing. The flowchart begins with Raw Material Input, which is processed through five key strategies: Waste Prevention, Material Recovery, Sustainable Substitution, Process Optimization, and Digital Integration. Waste Prevention minimizes hazardous waste at the source by optimizing production processes and adopting lean manufacturing techniques. Material Recovery ensures that valuable chemicals are reclaimed and reused through closed-loop systems, reducing dependence on virgin resources. Sustainable substitution replaces toxic substances with eco-friendly alternatives using green chemistry innovations, enhancing safety and compliance. Process optimization improves efficiency by refining manufacturing workflows and reducing waste generation. Digital Integration leverages AI, IoT, and blockchain to enhance tracking, automation, and decision-making. The final step, sustainable manufacturing outcomes, highlights the benefits of these strategies which include reduced waste, improved efficiency, and adherence to environmental regulations, thereby ensuring a more sustainable and responsible production system.

**3.2 Lifecycle of Chemicals in a Circular Economy Model**

Figure 3 presents a comprehensive lifecycle model for chemical management in a circular economy framework within electronics manufacturing. It depicts the continuous flow of
chemicals through interconnected stages, from raw material extraction to sustainable reuse. Key elements include material recovery, waste prevention, sustainable substitution, and digital integration. The diagram emphasizes resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, and compliance with regulatory standards. This lifecycle approach ensures that chemicals are utilized, recovered, and reintegrated, fostering sustainability and minimizing waste in manufacturing processes.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3: Lifecycle of chemicals in a circular economy model</figcaption></figure>

Figure 3 represents the lifecycle of chemicals within a circular economy framework, offering a structured approach to sustainable chemical management in electronics manufacturing. The cycle begins with Raw Material Extraction, where essential resources for chemical production are sourced. These materials are then refined and processed during the Chemical Production phase, transforming them into usable compounds for industrial applications. Following production, chemicals enter the manufacturing and application phase, where they are utilized in electronic components and production systems. To minimize waste, waste prevention and process optimization strategies are integrated, employing lean manufacturing techniques, efficiency improvements, and digital monitoring technologies. When waste is generated, Material Recovery and Recycling ensures the reclamation and repurposing of valuable chemicals, reducing dependence on virgin resources while aligning with circular economy principles.

Next, sustainable substitution promotes the transition from hazardous chemicals to eco-friendly alternatives through green chemistry advancements, improving both environmental sustainability and regulatory compliance. The final stage, reuse and circular integration, facilitates the reintegration of recovered chemicals into production cycles, extending material lifespan and reducing environmental impact. Throughout the lifecycle, Digital Integration, utilizing AI, IoT, and blockchain, enhances tracking, automation, and compliance monitoring. The interconnected nature of these phases underscores the need for sustainability, efficiency, and continuous improvement. By implementing this model, electronics manufacturers can effectively reduce chemical waste, lower environmental risks, and optimize resource utilization, thereby ensuring a more sustainable and responsible production process.
**4. Challenges and Solutions in Implementation**

The implementation of circular economy principles in chemical management within electronics manufacturing presents several challenges, including regulatory complexities, economic constraints, and the integration of advanced digital technologies. Manufacturers must comply with stringent regulations such as the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS), the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), as well as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which are designed to limit hazardous substances and promote environmentally sustainable practices. However, these regulatory requirements are frequently updated, necessitating continuous adjustments in production processes and dedicated resources for compliance.

To address these challenges, manufacturers should establish specialized compliance teams, leverage digital platforms for real-time regulatory tracking, and actively collaborate with regulatory bodies and industry associations. Engaging in industry forums can also facilitate the exchange of compliance strategies and the development of standardized approaches to regulatory adaptation (Dennison et al., 2024). Shifting to a circular economy model requires substantial upfront investment in automated chemical dispensing systems, on-site recycling infrastructure, and digital tracking technologies. While the financial benefits of reduced waste and improved resource efficiency may take time to materialize, companies can mitigate risks by developing strong business cases that highlight long-term cost savings, utilizing government grants and tax incentives, and collaborating with suppliers and technology providers to share costs and investment risks (Basiru et al., 2025).

The integration of advanced digital tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and blockchain, is crucial for efficient chemical management but comes with its own set of challenges. Many existing systems are not designed to support the sophisticated requirements of these technologies, and employees often require extensive training to operate and maintain digital tools effectively. Resistance to change within organizations can further hinder adoption. To overcome these barriers, manufacturers should invest in comprehensive workforce training programs, initiate pilot projects to demonstrate the benefits of digital integration, and gradually scale successful implementations across operations. Additionally, forming strategic alliances with technology firms and academic institutions can help organizations stay at the forefront of innovation, ensuring continuous improvement in chemical management practices (Abbate et al., 2025). By proactively addressing these challenges with well-structured solutions, electronics manufacturers can successfully implement circular economy principles, ultimately driving sustainability, cost savings, and operational efficiency.

**4.1: Challenges in Adopting Circular Economy Practices and Proposed Solutions**

Transitioning to circular economy practices in chemical management within electronics manufacturing presents several challenges. Table 3 identifies key obstacles such as high initial investment, technological limitations, regulatory complexities, supply chain constraints, and resistance to change. Additionally, it outlines strategic solutions, including government incentives, technological advancements, regulatory alignment, improved supplier collaboration, and employee training programs (Nwamekwe and Igbokwe, 2024). Addressing
these challenges is crucial for fostering sustainability, optimizing resource efficiency, and ensuring long-term economic and environmental benefits in the electronics industry.

<table><caption>Table 3: Challenges in adopting circular economy practices and proposed solutions</caption><thead><tr><th>Challenges</th><th>Proposed Solutions</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>High Initial Investment</td><td>Government incentives, subsidies, and phased implementation strategies</td></tr><tr><td>Technological Limitations</td><td>Investment in R and D, partnerships with technology providers, and pilot projects</td></tr><tr><td>Regulatory Complexities</td><td>Clear policy frameworks, industry collaboration, and compliance support programs</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain Constraints</td><td>Strengthening supplier networks, circular procurement policies, and improved logistics</td></tr><tr><td>Resistance to Change</td><td>Employee training, awareness programs, and leadership commitment to sustainability</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 3 highlights key challenges in adopting circular economy principles in chemical management and presents targeted solutions. A major obstacle is the high initial investment required for infrastructure upgrades and automation, which can be mitigated through government incentives, subsidies, and phased implementation strategies. Technological limitations also hinder progress, as some industries lack access to advanced recovery and recycling technologies; increased R and D investment, partnerships with technology providers, and pilot projects can address this issue.

Regulatory complexities pose compliance difficulties due to varying environmental policies, but clear policy frameworks, industry collaboration, and compliance support programs can streamline adherence. Supply chain constraints further challenge circular practices, necessitating stronger supplier networks, circular procurement policies, and improved logistics. Additionally, resistance to change, often due to a lack of awareness, can be overcome through employee training, awareness programs, and strong leadership commitment. Implementing these solutions fosters sustainability and efficient chemical management.

## 5. Conclusion

The adoption of circular economy principles in chemical management within electronics manufacturing presents a viable strategy for reducing hazardous waste and promoting sustainability. By leveraging process optimization, lean manufacturing techniques, chemical recycling, sustainable material substitution, and advanced digital tools, manufacturers can significantly enhance resource efficiency and operational effectiveness. These approaches contribute to a resilient and sustainable manufacturing ecosystem where waste is minimized, valuable materials are continuously recovered, and environmental impact is substantially reduced. However, transitioning to these sustainable practices comes with significant challenges. Regulatory compliance remains a pressing issue, as manufacturers must continuously adapt to evolving standards such as the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS), the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Economic constraints, particularly the high initial investments required for infrastructure upgrades and technology integration, further
complicate the transition. Additionally, the successful adoption of digital tracking tools and AI-
driven systems necessitates comprehensive training and the development of robust
technological infrastructure. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts among
industry stakeholders, policymakers, and technology providers to establish supportive
frameworks and incentivize sustainable practices.

Ultimately, transitioning towards circular economy-based chemical management is both a necessary and feasible strategy for balancing environmental sustainability with industrial efficiency. With continuous innovation, robust regulatory support, and industry-wide collaboration, the electronics manufacturing sector can significantly reduce chemical waste, thus paving the way for a more sustainable and competitive future.

References

Abbate, E., Ragas, A. M. J., Caldeira, C., Posthuma, L., Aguirre, I. G., Devic, A. C., Soeteman-Hernández, L. G., Huijbregts, M. a. J., and Sala, S. (2025). Operationalization of the safe and sustainable by design framework for chemicals and materials: challenges and proposed actions. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 21(2), 245–262.
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae031

Adebayo, N. Y. A., Ikevuje, N. A. H., Kwakye, N. J. M., and Esiri, N. A. E. (2024). Circular economy practices in the oil and gas industry: A business perspective on sustainable resource management. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), 267–285.
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.3.0353

Basiru, J. O., Ejiofor, C. L., Onukwulu, E. C., and Attah, R. U. (2025). Sustainable Procurement in Multinational Corporations: A conceptual framework for aligning business and environmental goals. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(1), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmrge.2023.4.1.774-787

Dennison, M. S., Kumar, M. B., and Jebabalan, S. K. (2024). Realization of circular economy principles in manufacturing: obstacles, advancements, and routes to achieve a sustainable industry transformation. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00689-2

Digitemie, W. N., Onyeke, F. O., Adewoyin, M. A., and Dienagha, I. N. (2025). Implementing circular economy principles in oil and gas: addressing waste management and resource reuse for sustainable operations. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmrge.2025.6.1.99-104

Ezekwu, N. E. (2025). Sustainable supply chain practices: Driving efficiency, reducing waste, and promoting circular economy models. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(1), 1167–1181. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0206

Gorokhova, T., Kozlova, A., Laguta, Y., Skrashchuk, L., and Kaminskyi, S. (2024). The role of the circular economy in advancing environmentally sustainable industrial production. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3), s191-s211.
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr10
Igbokwe, N. C., Okpala, C. C. and Nwamekwe, C. O. (2024). The Implementation of Internet of Things in the Manufacturing Industry: An Appraisal. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 20, iss. 7, https://www.ijerd.com/paper/vol20-issue7/2007510516.pdf

Ihueze C. C. And Okpala C. C. (2011). A Survey of Optimum Manufacturing Strategy as a Tool for Enhanced Industrial Revenue. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2011/December-2011/1321-1329.pdf

Jamal, A. (2024). The role of circular economy principles in revolutionising sustainable manufacturing practices. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.27955

Komyshev, D., Kapral, A., Drebot, O., Sakharnatska, L., and Karpyk, J. (2024). Advancing Waste Reduction and Resource Conservation through Circular Economy Practices: A Rational Review. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3), s173-s190. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr09

Masudin, I., Habibah, I. Z., Wardana, R. W., Restuputri, D. P., and Shariff, S. S. R. (2024). Enhancing supplier selection for sustainable raw materials: A comprehensive analysis using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS methods. Logistics, 8(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030074

Nowak-Marchewka, K., Osmólska, E., and Stoma, M. (2025). Progress and challenges of circular economy in selected EU countries. Sustainability, 17(1), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010320

Nwamekwe C. O. and Nwabunwanne E. C. (2025). Circular Economy and Zero-Energy Factories: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Manufacturing. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JREAS), 10(1), 829-835. https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/JREAS/article/view/456

Nwamekwe, C. O. and Okpala, C. C. (2025). Circular Economy Strategies in Industrial Engineering: From Theory to Practice. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, vol. 6, iss. 1, https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250212103754_MGE-2025-1-288.1.pdf

Nwamekwe, C. O., and Igbokwe, N. C. (2024). Supply Chain Risk Management: Leveraging AI for Risk Identification, Mitigation, and Resilience Planning. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Technology & Operations Management, 2(2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.62157/ijietom.v2i2.38

Nwamekwe, C. O., Ewuzie, N. V., Igbokwe, N. C., Okpala, C. C., and U-Dominic, C. M. (2024). Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Nigeria: Optimization and Implementation Appraisal. Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 9(3). https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/JREAS/article/view/3967
Nwamekwe, C. O., Ewuzie, N. V., Igbokwe, N. C., U-Dominic, C. M., and Nwabueze, C. V. (2024). Adoption of Smart Factories in Nigeria: Problems, Obstacles, Remedies and Opportunities. International Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 2(2). Retrieved from https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/ijipe/article/view/4167

Obiuto, N. C., Ninduwezuor-Ehiobu, N., Ani, E. C., Olu-Lawal, K. A., and Ugwuanyi, E. D. (2024). Implementing circular economy principles to enhance safety and environmental sustainability in manufacturing. Deleted Journal, 4(2), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.2.2432

Okpala C. C., and Egwuagu O. (2016). Benefits and Challenges of Total Productive Maintenance Implementation. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, vol. VII, iss. iii, July-Sept. 2016, pp. 196-200. http://www.technicaljournalsonline.com/ijeat/VOL%20VII/IJAET%20VOL%20VII%20ISSUE%20III%20JULY%20SEPTEMBER%202016.html

Okpala C. C., Nwankwo C. O., and Onu C. E. (2020). Lean Production System Implementation in an Original Equipment Manufacturing Company: Benefits, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology Vol. 9, iss. 7 https://www.ijert.org/volume-09-issue-07-july-2020

Okpala, C. C. and Udu, C. E. (2025). Big Data Applications in Manufacturing Process Optimization. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, vol. 6, iss. 1, https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250212105349_MGE-2025-1-308.1.pdf

Okpala, C. C., Udu, C. E. and Nwamekwe, C. O. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Total Productive Maintenance: The Future of Maintenance in Smart Factories. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 21, iss. 1, https://ijerd.com/paper/vol21-issue1/21016874.pdf

Okpala, C., Igbokwe, N. and Nwankwo, C. (2013). Revolutionizing Manufacturing: Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Efficiency and Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol.19, iss. 6

Okpala, S. C. and Okpala, C. C. (2024). The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Digital Healthcare in the Nigerian Tertiary Hospitals: Mitigating the Challenges. Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 20, iss. 4, http://ijerd.com/paper/vol20-issue4/20047681.pdf

Onukwulu, N. E. C., Dienagha, N. I. N., Digitemie, N. W. N., Egbumokei, N. P. I., and Oladipo, N. O. T. (2025). Integrating sustainability into procurement and supply chain processes in the energy sector. Gulf Journal of Advance Business Research, 3(1), 76-104. https://doi.org/10.51594/gjabr.v3i1.68
Rajčić, V., Lin, Y., Laban, M., Tsikaloudaki, K., and Ungureanu, V. (2024). Cultural and societal challenges for circular strategies implementation. Sustainability, 17(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010220

Rasu, S. (2024). How mechanical product design can reduce environmental impacts. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 08(11), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2024.811003

Sardana, S., Singh, V., and Adhikari, D. (2024). Sustainable product design. In Advances in e-business research series (pp. 65–90). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9699-5.ch004

Singh, P. (2024). Significance of Research in Green Design of Product: An Overview. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(11), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i11771

Stadelmann, B., and Slootweg, C. (2024). Circular chemistry: Adapting linear chemistry to mitigate the climate crisis. Mètode Revista De Difusió De La Investigació, 15. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.15.27370

Yea, M., and Yoo, S. H. (2024). Product design and recycling Operations Strategy considering recyclability. Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 35(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.32956/kopoms.2024.35.1.109