# A critical appraisal of “effects of exercise therapy on disability, mobility, and quality of life in the elderly with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials”

Pierre Novert, Mathilde Pelletier-Visa, Bruno Pereira, Charlotte Lanhers, Emmanuel Coudeyre

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Pierre Novert, Mathilde Pelletier-Visa, Bruno Pereira, Charlotte Lanhers, Emmanuel Coudeyre. A critical appraisal of “effects of exercise therapy on disability, mobility, and quality of life in the elderly with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2024, 19 (1), pp.427. 10.1186/s13018-024-04766-0. hal-04772725

HAL Id: hal-04772725

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04772725v1

Submitted on 8 Nov 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
**CORRESPONDENCE**

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# A critical appraisal of “effects of exercise therapy on disability, mobility, and quality of life in the elderly with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials”

Pierre Novert<fnref n="1" />*, Mathilde Pelletier-Visa<fnref n="1" />, Bruno Pereira<fnref n="2" />, Charlotte Lanhers<fnref n="1" /> and Emmanuel Coudeyre<fnref n="1" />

**Keywords** Chronic low back pain, Physical exercise, Aged, Randomised controlled trial, meta-analysis

**Dear editor**

Chronic low back pain (CLBP), defined as pain in the lumbar region lasting more than 3 months, is a major public health issue [1]. Optimal management strategies for this condition have yet to be clearly defined. Neither affected individuals or healthcare professionals are not satisfied with the usual treatments of analgesics, physical exercise and physiotherapy. We have very few studies on the therapeutic and physical management of low-back pain in populations aged over 55 on Pubmed.

Before starting, a reminder of some definitions. Exercise therapy [2] is a regimen or plan of physical activities designed and prescribed for specific therapeutic goals. Its purpose is to restore normal musculoskeletal function or to reduce pain caused by diseases or injuries.

Then, the definition of exercise [3] is a physical activity which is usually regular and done with the intention of improving or maintaining physical fitness or health. Contrast with physical exertion which is concerned largely with the physiologic and metabolic response to energy expenditure.

Exercise therapy is recommended as part of the treatment of individuals with CLBP [4]. Many studies have shown the value of exercise therapy in reducing pain and increasing function in people with CLBP [5].

Chronic low-back pain, requires answers to its management, and in particular whether exercise as a treatment for adults aged more than 55 years old with low-back pain is a reality or not [6].

As early as 2016, papers started but never finished in the Cochrane database. A motivated team has already published a meta-analysis on the same subject in 2022, with no age limit [7]. This proves the determination to respond to this epidemiological problem. A steadily increasing number of elderly patients with low back pain; many results on therapeutic exercises; but few publications on the aged patient, a major contrast.

Therefore, the study by Shi-kun Zhang et al. "Effects of exercise therapy on disability, mobility, and quality of life in the elderly with chronic low back pain: a

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

BMC

© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

<footnote>*Correspondence:</footnote>

<footnote>Pierre Novert
pierre.novert@gmail.com</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, UNH, Clermont- Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand F-63000, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, secteur Biométrie-Economie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 5 place Henri Dunant, Clermont-Ferrand, France</footnote>
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials" published in July 2023, is important as it provides specific answers regarding exercise therapy for individuals aged > 55 years [6]. The authors highlight exercises that can be used to update current programmes in line with recent recommendations [4], thus helping to bring about changes in current practice.

Although we commend the authors for this study, which involved a substantial amount of work and time, we wish to highlight 2 main issues that we believe severely impact its results.

## The first issue relates to the primary and secondary endpoints of the study

Which outcomes were primary and which were secondary is unclear. The authors define 2 primary outcomes: pain and disability. Pain assessed by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). However, the title of the article mentions disability and mobility but not pain. Also, pain is not mentioned in the study hypotheses or at the beginning of the method where the other outcomes are listed. Furthermore the endpoints stated as secondary appear to have been analysed as primary endpoints, which is not in line with the Cochrane database recommendations [8]. In that article presents the general characteristics of the included studies; only 8 out of 16 used a VAS rating of pain as the primary endpoint. In 5 studies, the primary endpoint was either the Timed Up and Go (TUG) or the Short Form 36 (SF36).

## The second issue is the risk of bias in the articles included in the meta-analysis

The authors had the patience to search for a number of studies on the subject of chronic low back pain and its management by exercise in the elderly which is a very time-consuming task. The authors had the wisdom to use a study quality assessment scale to clarify their results.

The meta-analysis shows bias in article selection, mainly favoring studies with high bias risk. Only 2 studies with low bias risk were included. Thus, concluding that exercise significantly reduces VAS in elderly low-back pain patients is challenging. The authors used the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials (RoB2) to evaluate the quality of included RCT. Although if this tool is relevant, tools that are more specific for non-pharmacological [9], studies might have been considered. For example, the Downs and Black scale [10] has more criteria than the RoB2 and, therefore, the risk of study rejection is lower. A good practice is to exclude the high-risk studies from the analysis of the primary endpoint as they could alter the results. In our opinion, the inclusion of a majority of studies at high bias risk, with only 2 at low risk of bias, makes it difficult to conclude as to a significant effect of exercise on reducing the VAS rating of pain in older people with low back pain.

We verified if the results were different without the studies at high risk of bias. Figure 1 shows the sensitivity analysis that we conducted. We excluded studies according to (i) their risk of bias, (ii) a funnel-plot analysis, and (iii) the results of Egger's test. This resulted in

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Meta-analysis of the effects of different forms of exercise therapy on VAS pain rating. Results show the weighted mean with the 95% confidence interval</figcaption></figure>
the exclusion of the studies by Yalfany et al. [11] and Park et al. [12]. These studies were excluded one at a time in the study by Zhang et al., but they were not excluded together in that study.

The removal of the most biased of the 2 studies yields a weighted mean difference that is half of that found by Zheng et al.: 0.9 95% CI [0.47; 1.34] versus 1.75 95% CI [0.92; 2.59]. Furthermore, I², a measure of heterogeneity, decreased from 93 to 69.4% after the exclusion of the 2 studies with the highest level of bias.

Our reading of the article by Zhang et al. found a lack of precision and consistency across all criteria for the analysis. The use of a different sensitivity analysis grid would have improved precision by excluding poor-quality studies for the analysis of both the primary and secondary endpoints. Additionally, a complementary analysis of the same sample of studies for both endpoints would have been beneficial. Drawing conclusions from studies at high risk of bias can result in misleading findings.

Understanding of the results of the risk of bias analysis by Zheng et al. is limited by the lack of definition of the symbol ‘!’ present in this article. We were unable to find such a symbol in the Cochrane version of the sensitivity analysis grid and conclude that it is likely a typographical error.

We also found discrepancies in the flowchart shown in Fig. 1. The number of full texts.

assessed for eligibility is 183 on the flowchart, whereas, the number of records reviewed minus the number excluded yields 185. The sum of all the excluded studies listed in the figure is 164, not 168 as indicated. These discrepancies in the flowchart reduce our confidence in the meta-analysis performed.

Studies on CLBP in older adults are lacking, particularly in comparison to the abundance of research focusing on younger populations. The Cochrane database includes articles on exercise interventions such as Pilates or general physical activity for CLBP, however most studies predominantly involve individuals under 55 years old. To enhance precision, revisiting article databases before the selection deadline could allow for the addition of relevant studies and the removal of less impactful ones.

The review by Zhang et al. included studies with significant variability within the exercise and control groups, making comparisons challenging. To enhance clarity, the exercise and control therapies could have been categorized into aerobic exercises, core stability exercises, stretching, low-impact physical activities (like Pilates, yoga, Qigong, Baduanjin and Tai chi), and water sports.

Lastly, it seems important to state that the meta-analysis on Prospero (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) was registered a posteriori, on May 31, 2023, whereas the publication was submitted on February 25, 2023, which does not comply with article writing rules.

CLBP is a significant public health issue, especially in older individuals. The effectiveness of physical therapy and exercise, which is the recommended treatment for adults aged 18–55 years, in managing this condition among the elderly is still uncertain. Clear and precise answers are eagerly awaited by both affected individuals and healthcare providers. Reliable, high-quality analyses on a larger scale are crucial. Future research should focus on refining selection criteria and using a more comprehensive quality assessment grid for articles included in meta-analyses.

### Abbreviations

CLBP Chronic low back pain

SF-36 Short Form 36

VAS Visual Analogic Scale

TUG Timed Up and Go

### Acknowledgements

We thank Johanna Robertson, PT, PhD, medical writer for language editing.

### Author contributions

Conception and design: PN, MPV and EC. Reading and meta-analysis: PN, MPV, CL, EC and BP. Writing the present manuscript: PN and MPV. All authors have read and agreed with the published version of the manuscript.

### Funding

Not applicable.

### Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

### Declarations

#### Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

#### Consent for publication

Not applicable.

#### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Received: 24 April 2024 / Accepted: 25 April 2024

Published online: 26 July 2024

### References

1. Global regional, national burden of low back pain. 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol 22 mai. 2023;5(6):e316–29.

2. Karlsson M, Bergenheim A, Larsson MEH, Nordeman L, van Tulder M, Bernhardsson S. Effects of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 14 août. 2020;9:182.

3. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 22 juin. 2012;9(1):78.

4. Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2021 [cité 25 mars 2024];(9). Disponible sur: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/ doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2/full.

5. Li Y, Yan L, Hou L, Zhang X, Zhao H, Yan C, et al. Exercise intervention for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Public Health 17 nov. 2023;11:1155225.

6. Zhang SK, Gu ML, Zhang T, Xu H, Mao SJ, Zhou WS. Effects of exercise therapy on disability, mobility, and quality of life in the elderly with chronic low back pain.
pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg 19 Juill. 2023;18(1):513.

7. Zhang SK, Yang Y, Gu ML, Mao SJ, Zhou WS. Effects of Low Back Pain exercises on Pain symptoms and activities of Daily Living: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Percept Mot Skills févr. 2022;129(1):63–89.

8. Lerch C, Richter B. Endpoints of meta-analyses and primary endpoints of included studies: impact of non-concordance | Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts [Internet]. 2008 [cité 10 avr 2024]. Disponible sur: https://abstracts.cochrane.org/2008-freiburg/endpoints-meta-analyses-and-primary-end-points-included-studies-impact-non-concordance.

9. Robbins SM, Houghton PE, Woodbury MG, Brown JL. The therapeutic effect of functional and transcutaneous electric stimulation on improving gait speed in stroke patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil juin. 2006;87(6):853–9.

10. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised

studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health juin. 1998;52(6):377–84.

11. Yalfani A, Abedi M, Raeisi Z. Effects of an 8-Week virtual reality training program on Pain, fall risk, and Quality of Life in Elderly Women with Chronic Low Back Pain: double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Games Health J avr. 2022;11(2):85–92.

12. Park S, Park S, Min S, Kim CJ, Jee YS. A randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of equine Simulator Riding on Low Back Pain, morphological changes, and trunk musculature in Elderly Women. Med Kaunas Lith. nov 2020;13(11):610.

**Publisher's Note**

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.