# Soil phosphorus tests compared on established European long-term trials: which test is the winner?

Sophie Nawara, Wiggy van Daele, Fran Amery, Richard Warrinier, Caroline Vermeiren, Joeri Plevoets, Annemie Elsen, Wendy Odeurs, Harvey Vandendriessche, Commane Roisin, et al.

► To cite this version:

Sophie Nawara, Wiggy van Daele, Fran Amery, Richard Warrinier, Caroline Vermeiren, et al. Soil phosphorus tests compared on established European long-term trials: which test is the winner?. 8. International Phosphorus Workshop (IPW8), Sep 2016, Rostock, Germany. 284 p., 10.12754/procs . hal-01602280

HAL Id: hal-01602280

https://hal.science/hal-01602280v1

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
## Soil phosphorus tests compared on established European long-term trials: which test is the winner?

Nawara, S., Van Dael, T., Amery, F., Warrinier, R., Vermeiren, C., Plevoets, J., Elsen, A., Odeurs, W., Vandendriessche, H., Roisin, C., McGrath, S., Jouany, C., Pellerin, S., Denoroy, P., Eichler-Löbermann, B., Börjesson, G., Merckx, R., and Smolders, E.

A variety of tests for available soil phosphorus (P) is used worldwide, each with a historical and local background. The test ranging from intensity based ones, indicating P solubility to quantity based ones, i.e. near complete total soil P extraction.

A study was set up to identify the most suitable soil P test in a fully comparative way by using the same set of soils of contrasting fields on a set of soil P tests. The requirement for this is to find P response trials in which various fertilizer responses are only related to varying P doses. Soil samples (n=254) were collected from the plough layer of 12 fields complying to these conditions. The soils were collected from the field or from archived soil collection and were gathered in Belgium (2), France (3), Germany (1), United Kingdom (5) and Sweden (1). In all these fields different P fertilisation doses during several years (3-123 years) resulted in differences in soil P status and a significant P response in all 12 fields, sometimes for different crops per field. The relative response, i.e. the crop yield relative to that in highest P rate, ranged between 6.5 and 107.1%.

Soil P availability was measured in the 254 gathered soil samples by different methods: (1) extraction with ammonium lactate and acetate at pH 3.75 (Egnér et al., 1960); (2) extraction with 0.5 M NaHCO₃ (Olsen et al., 1954); (3) extraction with 0.01 M CaCl₂ (Houba et al., 2000); (4) extraction with ammonium oxalate (Schwertmann, 1964), with possibility to calculate the phosphate saturation degree (5) diffusive gradient in thin film technique (DGT) (Degryse et al., 2009). For each method, the relative yield, i.e. the obtained yield divided by the maximum yield observed on the same field, was plotted versus the measured soil P availability. A Mitscherlich curve was fitted on all data and on the data of every field separately. The “critical soil P availability” was defined as that concentration related to 95% relative yield.

The best soil P test was determined based on several indices: R² of the Mitscherlich curve, coefficient of variance (CV) of the field specific critical values, CV of the crop type specific critical value, the amount of fault positive or fault negative results included, ... The performances of the tests are approximately equal and differences between the soil P tests are minimal. A more detailed statistical analysis still need to be done, and the results of this analysis will be presented during the conference.

Degryse, F., Smolders, E., Zhang, H. & Davison, W. 2009. Predicting availability of mineral elements to plants with the DGT technique: a review of experimental data and interpretation by modelling.
*Environmental Chemistry*, **6**, 198-218.

Egnér, H., Riehm, H. & Domingo, W. R. 1960. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor- und Kaliumbestimmung.
*Kungliga Lantbrukshögskolans*, **26**, 199-215.

Houba, V. J. G., Temminghoff, E. J. M., Gaikhorst, G. A. & van Vark, W. 2000. Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent.
*Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis*, **31**, 1299-1396.
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., & Watanabe, F. S. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington, USDA.

Schwertmann, U. 1964. The differentiation of iron oxides in soils by extraction with ammonium oxalate solution. *Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde*, **105**, 194-202.