# Editorial: Impacts of COVID-19 on global plant health and crop protection and the resulting effect on global food security and safety

Jay-Ram Lamichhane, Francis Pf. Reay-Jones

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Jay-Ram Lamichhane, Francis Pf. Reay-Jones. Editorial: Impacts of COVID-19 on global plant health and crop protection and the resulting effect on global food security and safety. Crop Protection, 2021, 139, pp.105383. 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105383. hal-02937475

HAL Id: hal-02937475

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02937475

Submitted on 14 Sep 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Journal Pre-proof

Editorial: Impacts of COVID-19 on global plant health and crop protection and the
resulting effect on global food security and safety

Jay Ram Lamichhane, Francis PF. Reay-Jones

PII: S0261-2194(20)30316-1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105383

Reference: JCRP 105383

To appear in: *Crop Protection*

Received Date: 25 August 2020

Revised Date: 2 September 2020

Accepted Date: 2 September 2020

Please cite this article as: Lamichhane, J.R., Reay-Jones, F.P., Editorial: Impacts of COVID-19 on global plant health and crop protection and the resulting effect on global food security and safety, *Crop Protection* (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105383.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
1

# Editorial: Impacts of COVID-19 on global plant health and crop protection and the resulting effect on global food security and safety

2

3

Jay Ram Lamichhane<sup>a*</sup>, Francis PF Reay-Jones<sup>b</sup>

4

<sup>a</sup>INRAE, Université Fédérale de Toulouse, UMR AGIR, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex,

5

France; <sup>b</sup>Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Pee Dee

6

Research and Education Center, Florence, SC, USA

7

*Corresponding author: jay-ram.lamichhane@inrae.fr

8

Tel: +33 (0)5 61 28 52 50; Fax: +33 (0)5 61 28 55 37

9

10

**Keywords:** Global pandemic, crop losses, yield losses, insect pests, weeds, plant pathogens

11

## 1. Introduction

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Agriculture, in general, is an input-intensive sector. Key agricultural inputs include fertilizers, plant protection products (PPPs; that include conventional and bio-pesticides or any other beneficial arthropod used for inundative and inoculative biological control, including bees for pollination), seeds, fuel and labor. Disruptions in the supply and availability of these inputs are likely to result in reductions in outputs. However, these reductions depend on how much a given cropping system is dependent on these inputs (e.g. organic farming and agroecological cropping systems are less dependent on synthetic inputs compared with conventional systems, but can be more labor intensive).

The production, choice, purchase and application in a timely manner of these inputs are widely affected both at the upstream and downstream level by the COVID-19 pandemic leading to severe consequences in the agricultural sector.
More specifically to the crop protection sector, crop losses due to pests (sensu lato that includes animal pests, pathogens and weeds) may reach up to 80% (Oerke, 2006). Crop losses caused by crop pathogens alone cost the global economy USD220 billion annually (Savary et al., 2019). These losses may be prevented, or contained, by implementing crop protection measures including cultural (cultivar choice, crop rotation, tillage, mechanical weeding, etc.), biological (parasitoids, predators, etc.) and chemical measures (biopesticides and synthetic pesticides). Continuous monitoring and management of pests are critical for sufficient quantity and quality of harvest. A set of preventive and curative actions often needs to be taken to protect crops from pests, based on a sequential rationale of the eight principles of integrated pest management (IPM; Barzman et al., 2015). These principles should be applied in a timely manner at different stages from pre-sowing to post-harvest of a given crop. Any disturbance in these interventions may lead to irreversible losses at different stages of a crop cycle thereby altering the quantity and quality of a harvest itself with a huge burden on food security and safety, respectively.

This editorial aims to highlight key short- to medium-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures applied to combat it (e.g. restricting the movements of people and materials via lockdowns, travel restrictions, border closures, confinement, curfews or quarantine measures) on crop protection that may affect current and near-future harvests.

2. Direct and indirect short to medium-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on crop protection

2.1. No or limited supply and/or availability of plant protection products
Lockdown and quarantine measures applied to combat the COVID-19 pandemic have limited the production and supply of PPPs thereby affecting crop protection activities worldwide. Evidence shows a surge in demand for PPPs due to individuals and groups ordering more stock than they would normally. This will further hamper availability of PPPs on the market. For example, in China, a country affected at an early stage of the pandemic, the production of PPPs declined sharply and only resumed gradually after production plants were shut down following the outbreak (http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---34690-e.htm). Because China is one of several key producers and suppliers of PPPs to many developed and developing countries, the COVID-19 pandemic may affect the availability or lead to a rise in prices of PPPs worldwide. This may have an important impact on crop protection and yields, especially across high-income countries that are more exposed to disruptions in input supplies for their agricultural production processes compared with low-income countries (Schmidhuber et al., 2020). For example, grain and oilseeds production in the EU, the USA or Canada, largely depend on these inputs, notably fuels, seeds, fertilizer and pesticides.

The disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in the flow of PPPs, either from local or international suppliers to the farm level, has already resulted in reduced outputs (Brewin, 2020; Schmidhuber et al., 2020). For instance, transportation costs of pesticides to East Africa have increased by a factor of three and shipping was delayed due to fewer flights to the region (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-22/coronavirus-slowing-desert-locust-response-in-east-africa). This has in turn limited Eastern African countries' ability to readily control locusts that has resulted in record-setting waves of swarms in this region with serious pest outbreaks (Schmidhuber et al., 2020). The lack of an immediate response to control locusts in East
71 Africa has further triggered the migration of more swarms that have dramatically
72 afflicted parts of Kenya, Yemen, Pakistan, India and even Nepal with some of the swarms
73 that were the largest seen in several decades. Another example is the lack of effective
74 management of fall armyworm, a polyphagous pest that threatens food security
75 worldwide (Early et al., 2018), due to disrupted distribution and application of PPPs
76 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (FAO, 2020). Approval and distribution of genetically
77 engineered crops expressing insecticidal toxins has also been affected by the COVID-19
78 pandemic. Transgenic cowpea expressing Bt toxins was approved in December 2019 for
79 commercial use in Nigeria. However, restrictions in movement of people due to the
80 pandemic has considerably slowed the distributions of seeds to farmers (Isaac 2020),
81 which may lead to a delay in the adoption of Bt cowpea, with consequences for food
82 security.

83 Although no disease outbreaks due to the COVID-19 pandemic are yet reported, due to
84 the microscopic nature of pathogens, plant epidemics may have been spreading silently,
85 affecting crop yields and the global economy (He and Creasey Krainer, 2020). Although
86 no economic estimation of crop losses due to pests during the pandemic has been made
87 yet, devastating effects may have already occurred.

88 2.2. Lack of timely crop protection interventions due to shortage of labor and
89 spray operators

90 Low-income countries that have labor-intensive agricultural systems may find their
91 supply chains disrupted and outputs compromised due to labor shortages owing to the
92 COVID-19 pandemic. This is mainly due to direct health effects or indirect effects of
93 shutdowns. However, high-income countries have also faced labor shortage problems
94 such as those of spray operators or seasonal labor requirements for planting vegetables
and harvesting fruits, as already is the case in the United States and in several EU countries such as France, especially in the horticultural sector. However, even row crops that are typically less labor intensive have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-wheat/u-s-farmers-scramble-for-help-as-covid-19-scuttles-immigrant-workforce-idUSKBN2431BQ). This means that labor shortage effects occur across both high and low-income countries and that they are sector-specific rather than country-specific.

A reduced availability of agricultural labor may occur through multiple mechanisms including illness that reduces physical capacity, aversion behaviour and quarantine restrictions (Schmidhuber et al., 2020). In this situation, farmers might not be able to perform crop protection interventions including mechanical weeding and timely pesticide sprays. This may affect both preventive (e.g. no or reduced pest monitoring and early warnings) and curative (e.g. pesticide sprays) pest management actions leading to severe crop losses. There is evidence that IPM activities -- such as field activities for pest management, capacity development initiatives etc. -- have already been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (FAO, 2020).

For inundative biological control, farmers' pest management strategies rely on regular introductions of beneficial insects and mites that are live animals with a short shelf life. The logistics to supply these animals depends on rapid transit across borders, and on logistics running effectively. Staff shortages will interrupt logistics and lead to some shortages and delays. Although no data are yet available in this regard, we can expect significant yield losses due to the lack of timely crop protection interventions owing to labor shortage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

## 2.3. Lack of timely crop protection interventions due to financial constraints
Even in the absence of labor shortage, farmers may either not have access to bank loans or may not be willing to purchase pesticides to protect their crops. This may particularly be the case in developing countries where famers may save money for eventual household healthcare issues that may be either directly or indirectly aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the absence of prompt crop protection interventions, there might be two major types of crop losses in terms of: i) quality, because the visual aspect of agricultural products may be jeopardized that renders them unmarketable, and ii) quantity, because in the absence of timely protection interventions, pests will attack crops and reduce yields.

## 2.4. Lack of timely crop protection interventions due to equipment shortage

A shortage of certain types of equipment, such as fogging equipment that is currently in high demand for disinfectants to reduce the spread of COVID-19, may affect the crop protection sector. This equipment is used for crops such as potatoes, to apply sprout suppressants in storage (Paul et al., 2016). Shortages due to COVID-19 have also impacted the availability of respiratory protective equipment for agricultural workers handling pesticides, which has been reported in the United States (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 2020). This has led to a number of temporary recommendations from the U.S. EPA, including reusing N95 respirators, using expired respirators, applying pesticides that do not require respirators, and delaying pesticide applications. Clearly, this is leading to increased risks for the applicator as well as increased crop damage due to suboptimal applications.

## 2.5. Impacts on training and certification programs

According to the EU Sustainable Use Directive, all professional users of PPPs (those involved in the recommendation, sale, purchase and application of PPPs) must obtain an
individual certificate (European Commission, 2009a), with similar certification programs in other developed countries. While it is not currently possible to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training and certification programs, several lockdown and quarantine measures might have caused temporary disruption of these programs. In the United States, the U.S. EPA has allowed states to make temporary changes to training and certification programs for pesticide applicators, including relying on remote testing and extending certification periods. In addition, capacity development and awareness raising programs have already been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, as reported for IPM activities of fall armyworm (FAO, 2020). Delivery of traditional extension programs from crop protection specialists (from both public and private sectors) have had to shift from in-person meetings with farmers, consultants, and other agricultural professionals to mainly remote training programs. While in the long term, this may lead to more effective and immediate online training programs as a complement to in-person meetings, this immediate disruption could potentially hinder the transfer of technology from research and development to the end-users. Adoption of the most up-to-date pest management practices may therefore be delayed or curtailed as a result of this shift in delivery methods.

2.6. Active ingredient approval and authorization process of plant protection products

The authorization process prior to approving any PPP is generally lengthy and requires a lot of interactions between the manufacturer and regulatory authorities of a country. This is particularly the case in the EU following the Regulation 1107/2009/EEC on placing of PPPs on the market (European Commission, 2009b). This process might be slowed down due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
2.7. Delays in research activities at public universities and institutes

As countries deployed lockdown measures to slow the spread of COVID-19, many universities and research institutes were forced to scale back, delay, or cancel research activities (Servick et al. 2020), including research related to crop pests and their management. For example, agricultural research institutes in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania were forced to restrict or cancel activities such as research trials, stakeholder surveys, field days, and undergraduate and graduate student training (Makoni 2020). As universities reopen after lockdowns, outbreaks of COVID-19 on campuses in the United States are disrupting teaching activities, with potential for research activities to also be impacted. The pandemic may therefore lead to delays in both the development of novel pest management tactics and the training of students that may enter the workforce in agriculture and pest management.

3. Impacts on plant health

The COVID-19 pandemic may have affected a range of measures needed to ensure plant health. They include quarantine measures, implementation of plant health regulations, especially those related to plant passporting requirements. In addition, emergency authorization processes, needed to contain quarantine pests, may have been affected, yet the urgent threat of such pests requires a prompt intervention. Quarantine staff or inspectors of consignments at the borders may be exposed to sanitary risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, it is yet unclear whether the existing biosecurity systems remained fully operational during the pandemic for an effective surveillance and management of potential biological threats to plant health or whether these systems were relaxed or restricted to some extent. In particular, it is critical to recognize that the future of global food security and safety is linked across borders. A weak biosecurity in
one country not only threatens neighbouring countries and/or continents but the entire planet. Reviewing regulations and their implementation to secure crop protection, harvests and food supply is thus critical to safeguard food systems. Application of science-based preventive actions, including quarantine measures to contain invasive pests threatening global food security and safety is critical to protect plant health.

## 4. Conclusions and perspectives

The COVID-19 global outbreak is a wake-up call for a joint reflection among key stakeholders who are concerned about human, veterinary and plant health, under the umbrella of the one world one health initiative. This pandemic has shown the world how adopting preventive measures is essential to secure global health from the introduction and spread of devastating pests. This applies to human health as it does to animal and plant health. More specifically to crop health, re-designing of diversified cropping systems that are less reliant on synthetic inputs will certainly help improve the resilience of cropping systems with positive impacts on soil health. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic should encourage the development of more resilient food systems that can readily face similar pandemic events in the future. Finally, although a number of impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on crop protection have already been observed, the true impact of the pandemic remains unknown. An assessment is thus needed to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the crop protection sector, including impacts on global plant health.

211

212
213

214 **References**

215 Barzman, M., Bàrberi, P., Birch, A.N.E., Boonekamp, P., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Graf, B.,
216 Hommel, B., Jensen, J.E., Kiss, J., Kudsk, P., Lamichhane, J.R., Messéan, A., Moonen, A.-
217 C., Ratnadass, A., Ricci, P., Sarah, J.-L., Sattin, M., 2015. Eight principles of integrated
218 pest management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-
219 0327-9

220 Brewin, D.G., 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on the grains and oilseeds sector. Cand. J. Agric. Econ. 68, 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12239

222 Early, R., González-Moreno, P., Murphy, S.T., Day, R., 2018. Forecasting the global extent of invasion of the cereal pest Spodoptera frugiperda, the fall armyworm. NeoBiota 40, 25-50.

225 European Commission, 2009a. Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides.

228 European Commission, 2009b. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC.

232 FAO, 2020. Addressing the impact of covid-19 on the global action for fall armyworm control 4. https://doi.org/http://www.fao.org/fall-armyworm/en/

234 He, S., Creasey Krainer, K.M., 2020. Pandemics of People and Plants: Which Is the Greater Threat to Food Security? Mol. Plant 13, 933-934.
236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.007

237 Isaac, N. 2020. COVID-19 may stall Nigeria's rollout of GMO cowpea. Cornell Alliance for
238 Science (https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2020/05/covid-19-may-stall-
239 nigerias-rollout-of-gmo-cowpea/) (accessed 13 August 2020)

240 Makoni, M. 2020. In COVID-19-hit Africa agricultural research feels the pinch. The
241 Scientist https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/in-covid-19hit-africa-
242 agricultural-research-feels-the-pinch-67794 (Accessed 25 August 2020)

243 Oerke, E.C., 2006. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144, 31–43.

244 Paul, V., Ezekiel, R., Pandey, R., 2016. Sprout suppression on potato: need to look beyond
245 CIPC for more effective and safer alternatives. J. Food Sci. Technol. 53, 1–18.
246 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1980-3

247 Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S.J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., Nelson, A., 2019. The
248 global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 430–
249 439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y

250 Schmidhuber, J., Pound, J., Qiao, B., 2020. COVID-19: Channels of transmission to food
251 and agriculture. FAO 44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8430en

252 Servick, K., A. Cho, J. Couzin-Frankel, and G. Gulielmi. 2020. Coronavirus disruption
253 reverberate through research. Science. 367: 1289-1290.

254 United States Environmental Agency (U.S. EPA). 2020. EPA releases temporary guidance
255 on respiratory protection for agricultural pesticide handlers during COVID-19.
256 (https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/epa-releases-temporary-guidance-respiratory-
257 protection-agricultural-pesticide-handlers) (Accessed 13 August 2020)
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
**Declaration of interests**

[x] The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

[ ] The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>