# Shedding Light on the Enigmatic TcO2·xH2O Structure with Density Functional Theory and EXAFS Spectroscopy

Augusto F. Oliveira, Agnieszka Kuc, Thomas Heine, Ulrich Abram, Andreas

C. Scheinost

► To cite this version:

Augusto F. Oliveira, Agnieszka Kuc, Thomas Heine, Ulrich Abram, Andreas C. Scheinost. Shedding Light on the Enigmatic TcO2·xH2O Structure with Density Functional Theory and EXAFS Spectroscopy. Chemistry - A European Journal, 2022, 28 (59), pp.e202202235. 10.1002/chem.202202235. hal-05075979

HAL Id: hal-05075979

https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05075979v1

Submitted on 21 May 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Shedding Light on the Enigmatic TcO₂·xH₂O Structure with Density Functional Theory and EXAFS Spectroscopy**

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Augusto F. Oliveira,\*[a, b] Agnieszka Kuc,[a] Thomas Heine,[a, b, c] Ulrich Abram,[d] and Andreas C. Scheinost\*[e, f]

**Abstract:** The β-emitting ⁹⁹Tc isotope is a high-yield fission product in ²³⁵U and ²³⁹Pu nuclear reactors, raising special concern in nuclear waste management due to its long half-life and the high mobility of pertechnetate (TcO₄⁻). Under the conditions of deep nuclear waste repositories, Tc is retained through biotic and abiotic reduction of TcO₄⁻ to compounds like amorphous TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates. It is generally accepted that these precipitates have linear (Tc(μ-O)₂(H₂O)₂)ₙ chains, with *trans* H₂O. Although corresponding Tc–Tc and

Tc–O distances have been obtained from extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy, this structure is largely based on analogy with other compounds. Here, we combine density-functional theory with EXAFS measurements of fresh and aged samples to show that, instead, TcO₂·xH₂O forms zigzag chains that undergo a slow aging process whereby they combine to form longer chains and, later, a tridimensional structure that might lead to a new TcO₂ polymorph.

## Introduction

Technetium is the lightest element without a stable isotope and is almost completely artificial; only trace amounts are found in nature, formed from spontaneous fission in uranium minerals.

[a] Dr. A. F. Oliveira, Dr. A. Kuc, Prof. Dr. T. Heine
Institute of Resource Ecology
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)
Forschungsstelle Leipzig
Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig (Germany)
E-mail: a.faria-oliveira@hzdr.de

[b] Dr. A. F. Oliveira, Prof. Dr. T. Heine
Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Dresden
Bergstr. 66c, 01062 Dresden (Germany)

[c] Prof. Dr. T. Heine
Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University
50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu
Seoul 03722 (Republic of Korea)

[d] Prof. Dr. U. Abram
Institut für Chemie und Biochemie
Anorganische Chemie, Freie Universität Berlin
Fabeckstr. 34–36, 14195 Berlin (Germany)

[e] Dr. A. C. Scheinost
Institute of Resource Ecology
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)
Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328 Dresden (Germany)

[f] Dr. A. C. Scheinost
The Rossendorf Beamline (ROBL)
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF)
71, Avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble 38043 (France)
E-mail: scheinost@esrf.fr

\[**\] A previous version of this manuscript has been deposited on a preprint server (https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-rjndn)

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202202235

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

© 2022 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

⁹⁹mTc (metastable) is of great importance in nuclear medicine as a γ-ray emitter,[1] while the β-emitting ⁹⁹Tc (ground state) has no practical use and raises special concern in nuclear waste management due to its long half-life (ca. 2.1 × 10⁵ years) and relatively high formation yield (≥ 6%) in ²³⁵U and ²³⁹Pu nuclear reactors.

In water and in absence of other complexing agents, Tc prevails in oxidation states VII and IV.[2] Under nonreducing conditions, Tc VII forms the soluble TcO₄⁻ anion, which is highly mobile in the environment due to its weak interaction with adsorbent surfaces. Under the reducing conditions of natural, anoxic sediments as well as in nuclear waste repositories, however, numerous studies suggest that Tc precipitates as TcO₂·xH₂O, either as colloids or associated with Fe II-bearing mineral phases, which also act as catalysts for the Tc reduction.[2,3] Understanding the Tc redox processes in these conditions is essential for evaluating the safety of nuclear disposal sites; however, to date, even the structure of the TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates remains enigmatic and needs to be resolved.

Lukens et al.[4] proposed that TcO₂·xH₂O is formed by linear chains of equally spaced edge-sharing TcO₆ octahedra with terminal H₂O ligands in the *trans* positions. In the same year, Vichot et al.[5] arrived at similar conclusions, but argued that the structure would alternate shorter and longer Tc–Tc distances along the chain, based on data available for TcO₂ crystals.[6] However, these chain structures were based exclusively on EXAFS spectroscopy, which only provides radial interatomic distances and estimates of coordination numbers, and analogies to known crystal structures of other systems, like CoCl₂·2H₂O and RuO₂·2H₂O. In addition, in a recent work, Yalçintaş et al.[3a] showed that both the chain model with equally spaced Tc atoms (similar to the model by Lukens et al.[4]) and the one with alternating Tc–Tc distances (similar to crystalline TcO₂) could describe equally well their own EXAFS
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

measurements of a fresh TcO₂·xH₂O precipitate, thereby demonstrating that a conclusive characterization of TcO₂·xH₂O based on EXAFS alone is impossible, even though EXAFS is, to the best of our knowledge, the only experimental technique applicable in this case due to the noncrystalline nature of TcO₂·xH₂O.

In this work, in order to unambiguously assign the TcO₂·xH₂O structure, we use density-functional theory (DFT) to obtain energetically viable structural models. The results from the DFT modeling are then used in the interpretation of EXAFS spectra of fresh and aged samples, showing that TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates are polymeric structures consisting of zigzag chains of TcO₆ octahedra with H₂O groups in a cis configuration. In addition, we show that these polymeric chains eventually combine laterally, forming a tridimensional structure that might evolve to a new, low-energy TcO₂ crystal phase.

## Results and Discussion

For the DFT modeling, our strategy was to derive infinite TcO₂·2H₂O chains from TcO₂ crystal structures constructed from the crystallographic coordinates of the three known ReO₂ polymorphs, namely α-ReO₂ (P2₁/c),[7] β-ReO₂ (Pbcn),[8] and γ-ReO₂ (P4₂/mnm).[9] Although only one TcO₂ phase has been characterized experimentally (almost identical to α-ReO₂),[10] the use of ReO₂ as initial reference is justifiable because Tc and Re have very similar crystal chemistry[11] and, thus, TcO₂ counterparts of all ReO₂ polymorphs should be expected to form. The corresponding α-, β-, and γ-TcO₂ structures were obtained by replacing the Re atoms with Tc and performing full geometry optimizations, as described in the Experimental Section. Indeed, the optimized TcO₂ structures turned out to be comparable to the ReO₂ phases (Table S1 in the Supporting Information).

The calculated TcO₂ crystal structures are represented in Figure 1a–c. All three polymorphs consist of edge-sharing TcO₆ octahedra forming unidimensional chains that are laterally interconnected via corner-sharing O atoms. The chain configuration is characteristic of each TcO₂ polymorph: in α-TcO₂, the chains follow a straight path, with consecutive Tc–Tc pairs alternating between shorter and longer distances; the chains in γ-TcO₂ are also straight, but the Tc atoms are separated by identical distances; in β-TcO₂, consecutive Tc atoms are also separated by identical distances, but the chains follow a distinctive zigzag path. From each TcO₂ crystal structure, we extracted a single chain and converted the terminal O atoms into H₂O groups to balance the total electric charge, resulting in the TcO₂·2H₂O chains shown in Figure S2a-c. We refer to these chains as α-, β-, and γ-TcO₂·2H₂O, to indicate that the chains were derived from the α-, β-, and γ-TcO₂ crystal structures, respectively. We also considered hydroxide chains (Figure S2d–f) where all O atoms were converted into OH groups; however, these chains turned out to be energetically disfavored, as shown in Table S3.

All structures were fully optimized (lattice vectors and atomic coordinates) using AMS/BAND[12] with the PBE[13] density functional, scalar relativistic effects,[14] and numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs) augmented with a triple-zeta polarized (TZP) set of Slater-type basis functions. For the chains, D3 dispersion corrections[15] were also included. Further computational details are provided in the Experimental Section.

Figure 1d–f shows the optimized structures and relative energies calculated for the TcO₂·2H₂O chains. The β-TcO₂·2H₂O structure (zigzag) is clearly the energetically most favored one; the energy difference to the next structure, α-TcO₂·2H₂O, is already significantly high (29.4 kJ mol⁻¹ per formula unit). Note that, whereas β- and γ-TcO₂·2H₂O retained their general structure, α-TcO₂·2H₂O rearranged into an oxyhydroxide chain,

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** TcO₂ crystal polymorphs and the TcO₂·2H₂O infinite chains derived therefrom. Tc atoms represented as octahedra emphasize the structure of laterally interconnected chains in the TcO₂ crystals, and the primitive unit cells are indicated by black lines. The blue lines emphasize the linear and zigzag paths of the chains, with dashed lines indicating the longer Tc–Tc distances (in the case of alternating long and short distances). The TcO₂ crystals and TcO₂·2H₂O chains were fully optimized with DFT. During the α-TcO₂·2H₂O optimization, a few H atoms migrated from the H₂O groups to µ-O bridges. The relative energies per formula unit (Δ<sub>rel</sub>E) of the optimized structures are shown.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

which can be represented as Tc(µ-O)(µ-OH)(OH)(H₂O); nonetheless, for convenience, we will continue referring to this structure as α-TcO₂·2H₂O.

The Tc–O bond lengths as well as Tc–Tc distances calculated for the optimized TcO₂·2H₂O chains are shown in Table 1 in comparison with the corresponding parameters obtained for the TcO₂ crystal structures and from EXAFS spectra. The EXAFS parameters were determined by shell fitting (for details see the Supporting Information) from experimental spectra of a fresh and an aged sample. The spectrum of the fresh sample is the one published by Yalçintaş et al.,[3a] measured within a month after sample preparation; the shell fitting was redone in this work. The spectrum of the aged sample, on the other hand, is presented in this work for the first time; in this case, the TcO₂·xH₂O precipitate was stored in air, at room temperature, for about four years prior to the EXAFS measurement. The experimental EXAFS spectra of both samples were obtained at the Rossendorf Beamline at ESRF,[16] under identical conditions, most importantly, by using a closed-cycle He cryostat to maintain a temperature of 15 K and anoxic conditions during the measurement. They are shown in Figure 2, in comparison with the simulated spectra of the TcO₂·2H₂O chains and TcO₂ crystals calculated with DFT.

Table 1 clearly shows that, while the Tc–O bond lengths are characteristic of the chemical groups attached to the Tc atoms (µ-O, O, µ-OH, OH, and H₂O), the Tc–Tc distances have characteristic values for each system, even if only the nearest Tc–Tc neighbors are considered. Thus, these systems would be clearly identifiable by EXAFS measurements. Note that the TcO₂·2H₂O chains keep the same general characteristics of the TcO₂ crystal structures, that is, α- and γ-TcO₂·2H₂O form a straight chain, with alternating shorter and longer Tc-Tc distances in the former and only one Tc-Tc distance in the latter. Similarly, β-TcO₂·2H₂O – the energetically favored structure – remains as a zigzag chain with practically identical Tc–Tc distances.

The EXAFS Tc–O and Tc–Tc nearest-neighbor distances from the fresh and aged samples are in very good agreement

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Fourier-transform magnitudes (FTMs) from experimental EXAFS spectra of the fresh and aged TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates (red curves) and from EXAFS spectra simulated with FEFF9.6.4[17] for the TcO₂·H₂O infinite chains (black curves) and TcO₂ crystal structures (blue curves) optimized with DFT. The fresh sample was measured within a month of preparation;[3a] the aged sample was stored for four years under room conditions prior to measurement. The geometry of α-TcO₂·H₂O converged to a mixed protonation state, as shown in Figure 1d). For the TcO₂ crystals, peak A is associated with the first Tc–O coordination shell, B with the nearest intrachain Tc–Tc neighbors, C with the nearest interchain Tc–Tc neighbors, and D with the second intrachain Tc–Tc neighbors.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Tc coordination numbers (CN) and interatomic distances (R) from EXAFS shell fitting of fresh and aged TcO₂·xH₂O samples along with the values obtained from DFT for the TcO₂·2H₂O chains and TcO₂ crystals. The CN values for the Tc–Tc interchain distances consider only one neighboring chain.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Shell</th><th colspan="3">Exptl. EXAFS (shell fitting)</th><th colspan="3">DFT calculations</th><th colspan="6">Crystal structures</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates</th><th rowspan="2">Aged<sup>[b]</sup></th><th colspan="2">Infinite chains</th><th rowspan="2">β-TcO₂·2H₂O</th><th rowspan="2">γ-TcO₂·2H₂O</th><th colspan="2">α-TcO₂</th><th colspan="2">β-TcO₂</th><th colspan="2">γ-TcO₂</th></tr><tr><th>Fresh<sup>[a]</sup></th><th>CN</th><th>CN</th><th>R/Å</th><th>R/Å</th><th>CN</th><th>R/Å</th><th>CN</th><th>R/Å</th><th>CN</th><th>R/Å</th><th>CN</th><th>R/Å</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tc-(µ-O)</td><td>4<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.01</td><td>4<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.01</td><td>2</td><td>1.93</td><td>4</td><td>1.98</td><td>4</td><td>1.97</td><td>6</td><td>2.01</td><td>6</td><td>2.01</td><td>6</td><td>2.00</td></tr><tr><td>Tc-OH₂</td><td>2<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.39</td><td>2<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.14</td><td>2</td><td>2.11<sup>[d]</sup></td><td>2</td><td>2.23</td><td>2</td><td>2.24</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Tc-Tc<br>(intrachain)</td><td>2<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.55</td><td>2<sup>[f]</sup></td><td>2.54</td><td>1</td><td>2.04<sup>[e]</sup></td><td>2</td><td>2.53</td><td>2</td><td>2.90</td><td>1</td><td>2.62</td><td>2</td><td>2.64</td><td>2</td><td>2.84</td></tr><tr><td>Tc-Tc<br>(interchain)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.6</td><td>4.63</td><td>1</td><td>3.38</td><td>2</td><td>4.60</td><td>2</td><td>5.80</td><td>1</td><td>3.12</td><td>2</td><td>4.71</td><td>2</td><td>5.68</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>4.2</td><td>7.03</td><td>2</td><td>5.71</td><td>2</td><td>6.98</td><td>2</td><td>8.70</td><td>2</td><td>5.73</td><td>2</td><td>7.16</td><td>2</td><td>8.53</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.8</td><td>3.80</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>2</td><td>3.68</td><td>2</td><td>3.72</td><td>2</td><td>3.68</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.2</td><td>5.06</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>5.24</td><td>2</td><td>5.26</td><td>2</td><td>5.46</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2.5</td><td>6.04</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>5.44</td><td>2</td><td>6.00</td><td>2</td><td>7.88</td></tr></tbody></table>

Errors of ±25% are generally associated to CN values from EXAFS fitting. [a] Sample measured within a month from preparation.[3a] [b] Sample measured after four years of storage at room conditions. [c] Structure converged to an oxyhydroxide chain (Figure 1d). [d] OH bridge. [e] Terminal OH group. [f] Fixed during fitting.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

with the distances in the calculated β-TcO₂·2H₂O chain, as shown in Table 1. The Tc-Tc distances (which characterize the chain structure) differ by ≤ 0.02 Å, whereas the Tc-(μ-O) bonds differ by ≤ 0.03 Å; the differences are slightly larger for the Tc-OH₂ bonds (0.16 Å for the fresh sample and 0.09 Å for the aged sample), but still in good agreement in both cases. The discrepancy between Tc-OH₂ bonds in the fresh and aged samples is reflected in the sharper splitting of the Fourier transform magnitude (FTM) peaks corresponding to the nearest Tc-O and Tc-Tc distances (peaks A and B in Figure 2). The most significant difference between the fresh and aged samples, however, is the absence of signals related to the longer Tc-Tc distances in the former, either because of a high static disorder of the chains or because the chains are too short to show such backscattering pairs consistently (note that thermal disorder can be excluded since both the fresh and the aged samples were measured at 15 K).

The most conclusive proof of the formation of zigzag chains in the TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates comes from the EXAFS analysis of the aged sample. As shown in Figure 3, the χ(k) spectrum of the aged precipitate contains high-frequency signals between 5 and 7 Å⁻¹ that are absent in the spectrum of the fresh sample. These signals correspond to second and third intrachain Tc-Tc distances of 4.63 and 7.03 Å shown in Table 1, which are only possible in the β-TcO₂·2H₂O chain (calculated as 4.71 and 7.16 Å). Interestingly, Tc-Tc distances of 3.80, 5.06, and 6.04 Å, corresponding to the interchain distances observed in the β-TcO₂ crystal, could also be fitted, indicating that the precipitate develops a tridimensional organization with aging (Figure 4). Nonetheless, in the sample analyzed here, this tridimensional structure is likely in its initial stage, otherwise the EXAFS spectrum would bear a stronger resemblance to the spectrum of the β-TcO₂ crystal in Figure 2, especially with respect to peak C.

The absence of interpretable EXAFS signals related to longer Tc–Tc distances in the fresh sample and the presence of the signals associated with long, interconnected parallel chains in the aged sample is indicative of the aging process in TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates. In our interpretation, the short β-TcO₂·2H₂O chains combine with each other to form longer zigzag chains via condensation reactions, thereby releasing H₂O. As the chains become longer, condensation reactions leading to cross-linked chains start to take place. The shortening of the second Tc-O path in the experimental EXAFS (denoted Tc–OH₂ in Table 1) from 2.39 Å in the fresh to 2.14 Å in the aged sample is an additional indication of this condensation process. This scenario is consistent with the thermodynamic evidence compiled by Grambow[¹⁸] that TcO₂·xH₂O would release H₂O over time and that the process takes place very slowly; as discussed above, after four years the aged sample still shows early signs of cross-linking between chains.

Conclusion

In conclusion, by combining DFT calculations with EXAFS measurements, we have demonstrated that, contrary to the

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Experimental EXAFS spectra of fresh (top) and aged (bottom) TcO₂·xH₂O samples (black traces) and their reproduction by shell fitting (red traces). The main plots show the Fourier transform magnitude (bold lines) and the imaginary part (thin lines); the inserts show the corresponding k³-weighted χ spectra (the shadowed region indicates high-frequency signals absent in the fresh sample). The shell fit of the fresh sample is based on the DFT-derived structure of β-TcO₂·H₂O chain, the shell fit of the aged sample is based on the DFT-derived structure of the β-TcO₂ crystal. The fitted parameters are compiled in Tables 1 and S4.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Intra- and interchain Tc–Tc distances. The DFT values (black) correspond to the optimized β-TcO₂ crystal structure, whereas the EXAFS values (red) were obtained from fitting the experimental spectrum of the aged TcO₂·xH₂O sample.</figcaption></figure>

currently anticipated linear structure, TcO₂·xH₂O precipitates are polymeric structures formed of zigzag chains of edge-
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

sharing TcO₂ octahedra with terminal H₂O ligands at the cis positions (Figure 1e). Differences in the EXAFS of a fresh sample and a sample aged for four years indicate that the length of the polymeric chains increases slowly over time and might lead to crystallization of a yet uncharacterized TcO₂ phase analogous to β-ReO₂ (Figure 1b), which our calculations (Table S2) show to be energetically equivalent to the known P2₁/c[10] (α-TcO₂) phase.

# Experimental Section

## DFT calculations

**TcO₂ and ReO₂ crystal structures:** The initial TcO₂ and ReO₂ structures were constructed from crystallographic data for α-ReO₂[7] (monoclinic, P2₁/c), β-ReO₂[8] (orthorhombic, Pbcn), and γ-ReO₂[9] (tetragonal, P4̅₂/mnm), depicted in Figure S1. The equivalent TcO₂ structures were obtained simply by replacing the Re atoms with Tc. Finally, the tetragonal phases (γ-TcO₂ and γ-ReO₂) were duplicated in the c direction (1×1×2 supercells), so that all cells would contain four TcO₂ or ReO₂ formula units. Subsequently, the atomic coordinates and lattice vectors were fully optimized using the PBE[13] density functional with numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs) augmented with a triple-zeta polarized (TZP) set of Slater-type basis functions; relativistic effects were included by using the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA).[14] These calculations were conducted with the AMS/BAND[12] program, using regular k-space grids with quality set to "Good" and default convergence criteria.

**TcO₂·2H₂O infinite chains:** The initial TcO₂·2H₂O chains were constructed by extracting a single chain of edge-sharing TcO₆ octahedra from each TcO₂ crystal phase and saturating the O atoms with H according to two approaches, as shown in Figure S2: (a–c) terminal O atoms were converted into H₂O ligands and bridging O atoms were left unprotonated, resulting in (Tc(µ-O)₂(OH)₂)ₙ chains; (d–f) terminal and bridging O atoms were converted into OH groups, resulting in (Tc(OH)₂(µ-OH)₂)ₙ chains. Finally, the atomic coordinates and lattice parameter of each structure were fully optimized using the method described above for the crystal structures, supplemented with Grimme's D3 corrections[15] to improve the description of dispersion interactions with OH and H₂O groups. Like for the crystal structures, these calculations were conducted with the AMS/BAND[12] program, using regular k-space grids with quality set to "Good". Note that these systems are periodic only along the chain direction.

**Single-point calculations:** Energies and electronic properties were calculated for the optimized structures with the same methods used in the preceding geometry optimizations, except for a denser k-space grid (quality set to "VeryGood"). For comparison, single-point calculations were also carried out within the FHI-aims program,[19] using the PBE[13] and HSE06[20] density functionals with a "tier 1" set of atom-centered NAO basis functions; relativistic effects were described with the "atomic ZORA" approach;[19] for the TcO₂·2H₂O infinite chains, the Tkatchenko-Scheffler (TS) method[21] was used for the dispersion interactions.

## TcO₂·xH₂O samples and EXAFS measurements

**Fresh sample:** The preparation and EXAFS spectrum of the fresh sample were reported by Yalçintaş et al.[3a] The TcO₂·xH₂O precipitate was prepared by acidifying a pertechnetate solution with concentrated HCl, then adding Zn to generate nascent hydrogen. After the reaction was completed, NaOH (20 M) was added to obtain a black precipitate, which aged for one week. The sample

was stored under Ar at liquid nitrogen temperature. The EXAFS was measured within 30 days of preparation at the Rossendorf Beamline (BM20 at ESRF, Grenoble, France) in fluorescence mode at the Tc K-edge (21044 eV). The sample was kept at 15 K during the measurement. Further details can be found in the original publication.[3a]

**Aged sample:** The sample was prepared by hydrolysis of K₂[TcCl₆], which was previously synthesized by an established procedure.[22] Solid K₂[TcCl₆] (390 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 0.5 mL H₂O, which resulted in the precipitation of a dark brown solid. An aqueous solution of KOH (2 mL, 0.1 M) was added, and the suspension was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. The formed black brown solid was filtered off and washed with water (5×1 mL). The absence of Cl⁻ in the final washing solution was checked by the addition of Ag(NO₃). The thus formed TcO₂·xH₂O was dried in air at room temperature. Yield: practically quantitative. The sample was prepared and stored at room temperature in air for four years prior to the EXAFS measurement, which was conducted identically to the fresh sample.

## EXAFS analyses

**EXAFS shell fitting:** Tc K-edge EXAFS shell fittings were conducted in R-space with WinXAS[23] using the β-TcO₂·2H₂O chain structure optimized with DFT (Figure 2e) for the oxygen coordination to Tc and for intrachain Tc–Tc distances. Interchain Tc–Tc distances from the DFT-derived β-TcO₂ crystal structure were also included. The spectrum of the fresh precipitate was well fit by four oxygen atoms at 2.01 Å and two oxygen atoms at 2.39 Å, and 8 additional four-legged multiple scattering paths arising from the quasi square-planar configuration of the four nearest oxygen atoms (Table S4). Furthermore, we obtained two Tc atoms at 2.55 Å. These radial distances are in excellent agreement with the local structure of β-TcO₂·2H₂O, except for the two longer Tc–O distances, which represent the two water molecules in the coordination sphere and are about 0.2 Å longer than predicted by DFT. Note that a similarly long distance has been determined by Lukens et al.,[4] also by EXAFS shell fitting. The spectrum of the fresh precipitate does not reveal any backscattering peaks at longer Tc–Tc distances that could be fitted. For the aged sample, in addition to the local structure obtained for the fresh sample, Tc–Tc distances corresponding to the 2nd and 3rd intrachain shells and for the three interchain shells (Figure 4) could also be fitted (Table S4 and Figure 3), in good agreement with the parameters in the β-TcO₂·2H₂O chain and β-TcO₂ crystal. The amplitude reduction factor S₀² was fixed to 0.8 for all fits.

**EXAFS simulation:** EXAFS spectra were simulated for the DFT-optimized structures with the program FEFF9.6.4[17] using the self-consistent field mode with a global Debye-Waller factor of 0.003 Å, amplitude reduction factor of 0.9, and ΔE₀ = 0.

## Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the European Commission (EC) through the EURAD FUTURE T3 project (H2020-847593) and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the KRIMI project (02NUK056C). The authors also thank Prof. Bernd Grambow (SUBATECH Nantes, France) for fruitful discussions. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in
the supplementary material of this article.

Keywords: chain structures • density functional calculations • EXAFS spectroscopy • nuclear waste management • technetium

[1] R. Alberto, COSMOS **2012**, **8**, 83.

[2] J. P. Icenhower, N. P. Qafoku, J. M. Zachara, W. J. Martin, *Am. J. Sci.* **2010**, *310*, 721.

[3] a) E. Yalçıntaş, A. C. Scheinost, X. Gaona, M. Altmaier, *Dalton Trans.* **2016**, *45*, 17874; b) K. Morris, F. R. Livens, J. M. Charnock, I. T. Burke, J. M. McBeth, J. D. C. Begg, C. Boothman, J. R. Lloyd, *Appl. Geochem.* **2008**, *23*, 603; c) T. S. Peretyazhko, J. M. Zachara, R. K. Kukkadapu, S. M. Heald, I. V. Kutnyakov, C. T. Resch, B. W. Arey, C. M. Wang, L. Kovarik, J. L. Phillips, D. A. Moore, *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **2012**, *92*, 48; d) J. M. McBeth, J. R. Lloyd, G. T. W. Law, F. R. Livens, I. T. Burke, K. Morris, *Mineral. Mag.* **2011**, *75*, 2419.

[4] W. W. Lukens, J. J. Bucher, N. M. Edelstein, D. K. Shuh, *Environ. Sci. Technol.* **2002**, *36*, 1124.

[5] L. Vichot, G. Ouvrard, G. Montavon, M. Fattahi, C. Musikas, B. Grambow, *Radiochim. Acta* **2002**, *90*, 575.

[6] I. Almahamid, J. C. Bryan, J. J. Bucher, A. K. Burrell, N. M. Edelstein, E. A. Hudson, N. Kaltsoyannis, W. W. Lukens, D. K. Shuh, H. Nitsche, T. Reich, *Inorg. Chem.* **1995**, *34*, 193.

[7] F. F. Ferreira, H. P. S. Correa, M. T. D. Orlando, J. L. Passamai Jr., C. G. P. Orlando, I. P. Cavalcante, F. Garcia, E.amura, L. G. Martinez, J. L. Rossi, F. C. L. de Melo, *J. Synchrotron Radiat.* **2009**, *16*, 48.

[8] A. Magnéli, *Acta Chem. Scand.* **1957**, *11*, 28.

[9] A. L. Ivanovskii, T. I. Chupakhina, V. G. Zubkov, A. P. Tyutyunnik, V. N. Krasilnikov, G. V. Bazuev, S. V. Okatov, A. I. Lichtenstein, *Phys. Lett. A* **2005**, *348*, 66.

[10] E. E. Rodriguez, F. Poineau, A. Llobet, A. P. Sattelberger, J. Bhattacharjee, U. V. Waghmare, T. Hartmann, A. K. Cheetham, *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2007**, *129*, 10244.

[11] a) S. Duckworth, X. Gaona, D. Castaño, S. Park, M. Altmaier, H. Geckeis, *Appl. Geochem.* **2021**, *105037*; b) P. V. Grundler, L. Helm, R. Alberto, A. E. Merbach, *Inorg. Chem.* **2006**, *45*, 10378.

[12] a) G. te Velde, E. J. Baerends, *Phys. Rev. B* **1991**, *44*, 7888; b) P. H. T. Philipsen, G. t. Velde, E. J. Baerends, J. A. Berger, P. L. d. Boeij, M. Franchini, J. A. Groeneveld, E. S. Kadantsev, R. Klooster, F. Kootstra, P. Romaniello, M. Raupach, D. G. Skachkov, J. G. Snijders, C. J. O. Verzijl, J. A. C. Gil, J. M. Thijssen, G. Wiesenekker, C. A. Peeples, G. Schreckenbach, T. Ziegler, BAND2019, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, **2019**; c) R. Rüger, M. Franchini, T. Trnka, A. Yakovlev, E. v. Lenthe, P. Philipsen, B. Klumpers, T. Soini, AMS 2019, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, **2019**.

[13] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **1996**, *77*, 3865.

[14] P. H. T. Philipsen, E. vanLenthe, J. G. Snijders, E. J. Baerends, *Phys. Rev. B* **1997**, *56*, 13556.

[15] S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, *J. Chem. Phys.* **2010**, *132*, 154104.

[16] A. C. Scheinost, J. Claussner, J. Exner, M. Feig, S. Findeisen, C. Hennig, K. O. Kvashnina, D. Naudet, D. Prieur, A. Rossberg, M. Schmidt, C. Qiu, P. Colomp, C. Cohen, E. Dettona, V. Dyadkin, T. Stumpf, *J. Synchrotron Radiat.* **2021**, *28*, 333.

[17] a) J. J. Rehr, R. C. Albers, *Rev. Mod. Phys.* **2000**, *72*, 621; b) J. J. Rehr, J. J. Kas, M. P. Prange, A. P. Sorini, Y. Takimoto, F. Vila, C. R. *Phys.* **2009**, *10*, 548; c) J. J. Rehr, J. J. Kas, F. D. Vila, M. P. Prange, K. Jorissen, *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.* **2010**, *12*, 5503.

[18] I. Grenthe, X. Gaona, L. Rao, A. Plyasunov, W. Runde, B. Grambow, R. Konings, A. Smith, E. Moore, M.-E. Ragoussi, J. S. Martinez, D. Costa, A. Felmy, K. Spahiu, *Second Update on the Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium, Neptunium, Plutonium, Americium and Technetium*, Vol. 14, Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), **2021**.

[19] V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, M. Scheffler, *Comput. Phys. Commun.* **2009**, *180*, 2175.

[20] a) J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, M. Ernzerhof, *J. Chem. Phys.* **2003**, *118*, 8207; b) J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, M. Ernzerhof, *J. Chem. Phys.* **2006**, *124*, 219906; c) A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, G. E. Scuseria, *J. Chem. Phys.* **2006**, *125*, 224106.

[21] A. Tkatchenko, M. Scheffler, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2008**, *102*, 073005.

[22] K. Schwachau in *Handbuch der Präparativen Anorganischen Chemie*, Vol. 3 (Ed.: G. Brauer), Stuttgart, **1981**, pp. 1597.

[23] T. Ressler, *J. Synchrotron Radiat.* **1998**, *5*, 118.

Manuscript received: July 20, 2022

Accepted manuscript online: September 2, 2022

Version of record online: September 23, 2022