# Geochemistry of Mars with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe

Roger C Wiens, Agnes Cousin, Samuel M Clegg, Olivier Gasnault, Zhaopeng Chen, Sylvestre Maurice, Rong Shu

► To cite this version:

Roger C Wiens, Agnes Cousin, Samuel M Clegg, Olivier Gasnault, Zhaopeng Chen, et al.. Geochemistry of Mars with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe. Minerals, 2025, Understanding Geological Processes through Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Analysis, 15 (8), pp.882. 10.3390/min15080882. insu-05357695

HAL Id: insu-05357695

https://insu.hal.science/insu-05357695v1

Submitted on 10 Nov 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Review

# Geochemistry of Mars with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe

Roger C. Wiens ¹,* ID, Agnes Cousin ² ID, Samuel M. Clegg ³, Olivier Gasnault ² ID, Zhaopeng Chen ⁴ ID,
Sylvestre Maurice ² and Rong Shu ⁵ ID

¹ Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051, USA

² Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, CNES, 31400 Toulouse, France; agnes.cousin@irap.omp.eu (A.C.); olivier.gasnault@irap.omp.eu (O.G.); sylvestre.maurice@irap.omp.eu (S.M.)

³ Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA; sclegg@lanl.gov

⁴ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China; chenzp@hku.hk

⁵ Key Laboratory of Space Active Opto-Electronics Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China; shurong@mail.sitp.ac.cn

* Correspondence: rwiens@purdue.edu; Tel.: +1-765-327-6962

## Abstract

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has been used to explore the chemistry of three regions of Mars on respective missions by NASA and CNSA, with CNES contributions. All three LIBS instruments use ~100 mm diameter telescopes projecting pulsed infrared laser beams of 10–14 mJ to enable LIBS at 2–10 m distances, eliminating the need to position the rover and instrument directly onto targets. Over 1.3 million LIBS spectra have been used to provide routine compositions for eight major elements and several minor and trace elements on >3000 targets on Mars. Onboard calibration targets common to all three instruments allow careful intercomparison of results. Operating over thirteen years, ChemCam on Curiosity has explored lacustrine sediments and diagenetic features in Gale crater, which was a long-lasting (>1 My) lake during Mars’ Hesperian period. SuperCam on Perseverance is exploring the ultramafic igneous floor, fluvial–deltaic features, and the rim of Jezero crater. MarSCoDe on the Zhurong rover investigated for one year the local blocks, soils, and transverse aeolian ridges of Utopia Planitia. The pioneering work of these three stand-off LIBS instruments paves the way for future space exploration with LIBS, where advantages of light-element (H, C, N, O) quantification can be used on icy regions.

**Keywords:** LIBS; Mars; geochemistry; ChemCam; SuperCam; MarSCoDe; Gale Crater; Jezero Crater; Utopia Planitia

## 1. Introduction

Robotic exploration of our solar system has focused strongly on the planetary bodies nearest to Earth, especially to the Moon and Mars. In particular, NASA has had an extended program of robotic Mars exploration since the mid-1990s. This program focused more initially on detailed orbital investigations, imaging large parts of the planet at sub-meter resolution and obtaining various types of spectral data at resolutions down to several meters (e.g., [1,2]). In situ surface exploration started with small rovers, increasing in size to the one-ton Curiosity rover (Figure 1a), which landed in 2012 [3] and its younger sibling, the Perseverance rover (Figure 1b) which landed in 2021 [4]. Both rovers are still operating

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

Academic Editor: Nancy Mcmillan

Received: 8 July 2025

Revised: 8 August 2025

Accepted: 13 August 2025

Published: 21 August 2025

**Citation:** Wiens, R.C.; Cousin, A.; Clegg, S.M.; Gasnault, O.; Chen, Z.; Maurice, S.; Shu, R. Geochemistry of Mars with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe. *Minerals* **2025**, *15*, 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15080882

**Copyright:** © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
at the time of this writing. The China National Space Administration (CNSA) has recently made strong progress in the exploration of the Moon and Mars, notably with the orbital reconnaissance of Mars by the Tianwen-1 mission and the landing of the Zhurong rover [5] in 2021 (Figure 1c).

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Three Mars rovers with LIBS instruments: (a) Curiosity (ChemCam) landed in Gale crater in 2012; (b) Perseverance (SuperCam) landed in Jezero crater in 2021; (c) Zhurong (MarSCoDe) landed in Utopia Planitia in 2021. For scale, the wheel-to-wheel widths of the respective rovers are: Curiosity and Perseverance (2.7 m); Zhurong (1.6 m). Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS (a,b) and CNSA/NAOC/GRAS (c).</figcaption></figure>

Results obtained on Mars near the turn of the century suggested that it had an early climate much like Earth's, with a water precipitation cycle, lakes, rivers, and canyons (e.g., [6]). The inferred time frame for these conditions was in the Noachian period, stretching from 4.1 to 3.7 Ga in the past. Key questions that drove exploration of the red planet were the following: "Follow the water: what state, how much, when and where?" "What was the extent and duration of potentially habitable conditions on Mars?" and "If the planet was in fact habitable, can we find evidence of past life on Mars?" An overreaching question was "How does Mars as a planet differ from Earth," for example, in its bulk chemistry, and in its crustal chemistry and mineralogy, given the lack of plate tectonics (e.g., [7]).

The tools to answer these questions involved ones that could determine the elemental chemistry, mineralogy, and isotopic composition of the accessible materials—surface rocks and soil. In particular, chemical analyses were needed to understand the levels of aqueous alteration that occurred within potential lake basins, revealed by the levels of enrichment of relatively insoluble elements such as aluminum (e.g., [8]). Chemical analyses were also needed to understand the role of evaporation and the possible presence of saline lakes,
based on deposition or absence of salts, and to understand the pH and redox potential of the waters. In addition to studies of bedrock, the chemistry of alteration products from groundwater that flowed through fractured rocks was of strong interest, as underground aquifers may have been a habitable environment for primitive life. Finally, the presence of biota fundamentally alters rock chemistry in many ways on Earth, and even if life was relatively sparse on Mars, e.g., in a pre-photosynthesis phase, it may have left telltale signs in the geochemistry, for example, that could be detected from isotopic compositions.

In the 1970s the Viking landers provided information on the chemistry of the soil and some pebbles using the x-ray fluorescence (XRF) [9]. The early Mars rovers (Sojourner, Spirit, and Opportunity) employed a form of XRF in which the x-rays were excited by radioactive sources. The Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometers (APXS) analyzed areas of a few square centimeters and worked best when dust was first cleared from the rock [10]. The requirements of dust removal and placement of the sensor directly on the rock meant that only rocks that provided a relatively flat surface accessible to the rover could be analyzed, ideally with dust-removal tools. In spite of the limitations of a relatively large footprint and the accessibility and dust constraints, many important results have been obtained with APXS instruments (e.g., [10]).

Starting in the late 1990s, NASA funded a project to explore the feasibility of developing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for planetary exploration (e.g., [11]). LIBS promised a number of potential advantages, especially the ability to operate at stand-off distances, not requiring the deployment of an arm or dust removal tool. The Curiosity rover, initially conceived in 2003, promised to host more than 60 kg of payload, allowing more and larger instruments than previous rovers [3]. NASA selected the ChemCam instrument (Figure 2a) to provide remote sensing for Curiosity [12,13].

ChemCam represents a major change from previous remote sensing. Prior missions, including orbital ones, generally relied on reflectance spectroscopy for remote sensing. Whether using the visible, near-, or mid-infrared range, reflectance spectroscopy provides mineralogical information rather than direct chemistry. In reality, both chemistry and mineralogy are highly important. Given the history of reflectance spectroscopy, and the importance of mineralogy in determining the role of aqueous alteration, the Perseverance rover's Science Definition Team dictated that its remote sensing instrument must provide mineralogy [14]. The SuperCam instrument (Figure 2b) was proposed to add not one, but two mineralogy techniques within the architecture of the LIBS-based ChemCam form [15,16]. Providing all these techniques and benefitting from the remote dust-removal capability of LIBS (Figure 3), SuperCam was chosen for the Perseverance rover.

While Curiosity's main goal was to study Mars' ancient habitability and the potential for ancient life [3], one of Perseverance's goals has been to collect samples for potential future return to Earth [4]. The Perseverance instruments—and the landing site—were all selected to both provide new scientific insights about Mars and to select and document the best samples for potential Earth return. NASA's Mars Sample Return program has been recently postponed, but the samples will likely still be eventually returned, given its high priority in NASA's Decadal Survey [17].

Based on the success of ChemCam, CNSA selected LIBS for its Zhurong rover. In addition to LIBS, the Mars Surface Composition Detector (MarSCoDe) instrument (Figure 2c) included an infrared spectrometer, which, like that on SuperCam (Figure 2b), also benefitted from dust removal by LIBS [18].

In this work we present the three Mars LIBS instruments mentioned above and discuss the current state of knowledge obtained from them. These three instruments represent a large fraction of the research performed by LIBS in planetary science. The entire scope of LIBS in planetary science is reviewed elsewhere, e.g., [19,20].
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Three Mars LIBS instruments, clockwise from top right: (a) ChemCam, insets show the Body Unit and the Mast Unit housing on the top of the rover; (b) SuperCam; (c) MarSCoDe. For scale, ChemCam and SuperCam Mast Units are 38 cm across. Credits: LANL (a,b), rover mast inset: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS; SITP/NAOC (c).</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Dust removal by SuperCam LIBS on target Fisherlaguna (Sol 1528); pre-LIBS image with dust-obscured surface is shown in inset. Small pebble on right is ~1.5 mm in diameter, for scale. SuperCam performed LIBS in three locations to form an asymmetrical pattern as part of a core-marking procedure performed prior to sampling, to enable the rotational orientation of the sample core to be identified after it is removed from the rock. The laser pits are indicated by arrows. The rock surface exhibits a dark coating; dust removed from the analysis area is seen piled around it. The LIBS dust removal clears the way, not only for LIBS, but also for the other techniques used by SuperCam. Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS; inset: NASA/JPL-Caltech/LANL/CNES/IRAP.</figcaption></figure>
## 2. Developing LIBS for the Red Planet

### 2.1. *Advantages and Challenges for LIBS on Mars*

LIBS features a number of advantages in application to another planetary body. Some of these traits apply to many places where LIBS is used, such as its rapidity of analyses, the overall ruggedness of the technique, the ability to probe small (<100 micron) features, and the ability to determine abundances of essentially all elements, including light elements H, He, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, and F, which cannot be quantified by x-ray techniques. Two physical characteristics of LIBS are especially advantageous to planetary science: its ability to perform at stand-off distances and, as already mentioned, the ability of the plasma shock wave to remotely remove dust from analyses surfaces (Figure 3), which is highly important on a dusty planet like Mars. The ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe instruments were designed for LIBS observations up to 5–7 m stand-off distances [12,13,15,16,18]. Each observation typically uses 30–60 laser pulses, from which the spectra from the first several laser pulses are discarded due to dust contamination. While the ambient atmosphere profoundly affects the plasma characteristics (Figure 4a), LIBS has proven feasible in any planetary atmosphere (or lack of it) in our solar system, with multiple studies carried out in complete vacuum (e.g., [21–23]), characteristic of the Moon, Mercury, asteroids, comets, and outer-planet moons; Mars pressure and composition (e.g., [24,25]; and Venus, with its ~90 bars of pressure and high temperature [26]). Low-pressure LIBS has the advantage of minimizing self-adsorption of photons that is characteristic of LIBS at terrestrial and higher pressures. Figure 4a compares the spectra of the same target at Earth, Mars, and lunar (vacuum) pressures, showing that, for the millisecond-range exposures used for the spectra in this figure, many emission peaks are significantly broader at terrestrial pressures, likely exhibiting self-adsorption, which strongly hinders quantification. At Mars pressure, the only possibility of significant self-adsorption that we have observed over a decade of use appears in relatively deep holes in the soil created by multiple laser pulses [13,27]. The lack of self-adsorption at Mars pressure allowed us to eliminate intensifiers or other fast-shutter devices and use simple, ungated detectors [13,15,18]. LIBS atomic emission line intensities are generally as strong at Mars pressure as in a terrestrial atmosphere, while emission-line intensities in vacuum, e.g., at the Moon, asteroids, comets, and icy moons, are weaker (Figure 4a) and may require a different spectrometer field of view due to the lack of confinement of the plasma.

LIBS possesses some disadvantages, particularly its relatively poor detection limits for certain elements that are important to Mars geochemistry. Among these are sulfur, chlorine, and phosphorous. Mars' crust is enriched in S and Cl (e.g., [29]) and so they play important roles in the geochemical cycles there. The strongest emission lines of sulfur, reviewed, e.g., in [30], are in the deep UV (180.73, 182.03 nm, and shorter wavelengths; wavelengths are given here and elsewhere in the paper as vacuum wavelengths, appropriate for Mars' thin atmosphere) and infrared (921.54, 923.06, 924.01 nm), beyond the ranges of ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe. Because of this, S is not routinely quantified by current Mars LIBS instruments, although S is observed using weaker lines in the 542–565 nm range when it occurs as a major constituent, such as in relatively pure Ca or Mg sulfates [31,32] or elemental sulfur [33]. Future instruments will likely extend the spectral range to cover the near-infrared S emission peaks. Likewise, the strongest Cl emission line in these instruments' spectral ranges, at 837.82 nm, is relatively weak, such that it is not routinely observed, though it can be observed when NaCl or perchlorates are present in significant amounts [34,35]. Phosphorous is important in biological processes, and thus in understanding the likelihood of past life on Mars, but its strongest emission lines (253.47, 253.64, 255.40, 255.57, 417.97 nm) are weak, and so the Mars instruments cannot observe P other than exceptional cases such as apatite grains and diagenetic features [36–38]. Special
calibration efforts have been required for these elements, often for individual studies, as
will be described in Section 2.3.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Planetary LIBS spectra: (a) Spectra collected under different planetary atmospheric conditions; shown is a UV portion of the LIBS spectrum of the Shergottite calibration standard [28] observed in air ("Earth"), simulated Mars atmosphere (930 Pa CO₂), and in vacuum ("Moon"). The spectra were collected using the SuperCam lab clone at Los Alamos under identical conditions except for the atmosphere; each spectral trace is the average of spectra collected at three different locations on the standard; at each location, 30 laser pulses were used; standard SuperCam pre-processing was applied to remove background, de-spike, remove continuum, and correct for the instrument optical response. Spectral traces for Mars and the Moon are offset for clarity. Green arrow highlights differences in relative peak heights, showing that the 285 nm Mg emission line is taller in air than the 288 Si emission line to the right, while Mg is shorter than Si in the Mars and Moon spectra; there are many other, smaller differences. Dark blue arrows at 316 nm highlight the broader peaks in air than for Mars and the Moon, assumed due to self-absorption. All spectra were collected with long (>>1 µs) exposures, as used on Mars. (b) Comparison of normalized UV portions of spectra taken on Mars with the three different LIBS instruments on two different standards (Shergottite and Norite glasses [28]) present on the three rovers. Spectral pre-processing has been applied in each case. Spectra are normalized to total emission and are offset for clarity.</figcaption></figure>
A slight disadvantage of LIBS on Mars relative to Earth is due to Mars's crustal enrichment in iron, as seen in Table 1. The net effect of the high iron abundances is variably poorer detection limits for many trace elements due to the large number of interfering Fe emission lines (Figure 4).

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Major-element abundances (in wt.%) for Mars locations: Gale crater (ChemCam/Curiosity), Jezero crater (SuperCam/Perseverance), and Utopia Planitia (MarSCoDe/Zhurong), and of Earth's continental and oceanic crust.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>N <sup>1</sup></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>FeO<sub>T</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Gale crater <sup>2</sup></td><td>28,243</td><td>47.9</td><td>0.98</td><td>10.5</td><td>18.0</td><td>6.1</td><td>5.9</td><td>2.6</td><td>0.97</td></tr><tr><td>Jezero crater <sup>3</sup></td><td>8004</td><td>44.2</td><td>0.36</td><td>6.7</td><td>19.9</td><td>16.0</td><td>3.9</td><td>1.8</td><td>0.52</td></tr><tr><td>Utopia Planitia <sup>4</sup></td><td>38</td><td>50.5</td><td>1.11</td><td>8.6</td><td>15.5</td><td>3.0</td><td>4.6</td><td>1.6</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>Earth cont. crust <sup>5</sup></td><td></td><td>61.6</td><td>0.67</td><td>15.0</td><td>5.6</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.4</td><td>3.2</td><td>2.58</td></tr><tr><td>Earth ocean crust <sup>6</sup></td><td></td><td>50.0</td><td>1.11</td><td>16.3</td><td>9.7</td><td>8.7</td><td>11.8</td><td>2.5</td><td>0.05</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Mars atmospheric pressure varies by ~10% over the course of a 24 h 38 min day-night cycle (a “sol”), and by ~30% over the course of a year (e.g., [43]; a Mars year is 687 Earth days). The ChemCam team initially thought that this pressure variation would not show any effect on LIBS. However, with continuous LIBS observations for over 13 years, we see a small effect of atmospheric pressure on the C/O emission line ratio [44]. Both emission lines are mostly from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, excited in the plasma; the effect of this pressure difference on the major-element quantification is expected to be well within their uncertainty ranges.

## 2.2. Instrument Designs

All three Mars instruments have broadly similar architectures and operational parameters (Figure 5; Table 2). Along with LIBS, all three instruments capture high-resolution images of the target area with a Remote Micro-Imager (RMI), allowing the users to view the laser pit and place its composition into the context of the rock or soil, whether fine- or coarse-grained, and, in some instances such as targeting a vein, whether the intended target was hit (Figure 5). MarSCoDe additionally includes a short-wavelength (0.85–2.40 µm) infrared spectrometer (SWIR) [18], while SuperCam includes an infrared spectrometer (1.3–2.6 µm) [45], a time-resolved remote green-laser Raman spectrometer, and a microphone [15,16]. As discussed elsewhere, these various techniques are highly complementary to the LIBS investigations.

For LIBS, all three instruments use an infrared laser emitting ~4 ns pulses, the beams of which are expanded and focused by Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes in the 100–110 mm aperture range (Figure 2), with on-target beam energies of 10–14 mJ per pulse (Table 2). The telescopes collect LIBS plasma emission and focus the light into a 300 µm optical fiber for transfer to the spectrometers (Figure 5). In the case of ChemCam and SuperCam, the optical fiber is >5 m long, allowing the laser and telescope (part of the “Mast Unit,” Figure 2a,b) to be positioned on the rover’s mast, ~2 m above the ground, allowing a good view of the surrounding surface in all directions [12,16], while the spectrometers are located in the rover body (“Body Unit”), minimizing the weight on the rover’s mast and its gimbals. In the case of MarSCoDe, all the main parts of the instrument reside in the rover body, which is thermally advantageous, and target acquisition is performed via a 2D pointing mirror (Figure 2c) that extends slightly above the rover body, providing a view of targets to the

<footnote n="1">¹ N indicates the number of observations. ² Mean of validated ChemCam LIBS data up to Sol 4354 [39]. ³ Mean of validated SuperCam LIBS data up to Sol 1379 [40]. ⁴ Mean of validated (LIBS quality index ≤ 3.0 [41]) MarSCoDe data from Zhurong mission. ⁵ Earth continental crust composition from [42] converted to oxide wt.%. ⁶ Earth oceanic crust composition from N-MORB component of [29].</footnote>
front and sides of the rover [18]. For MarSCoDe, the optical fiber between the telescope and spectrometers is thus short.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Common elements among all three Mars LIBS instruments. CCD = charge-coupled device; CWL = continuous-wave laser, used for autonomous focusing.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Design parameters for the Martian LIBS instruments.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>ChemCam [12,13]</th><th>SuperCam [15,16]</th><th>MarSCoDe [18]</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Laser type</td><td>Nd:KGW</td><td>Nd:YAG</td><td>Cr:YAG</td></tr><tr><td>Operating temp.</td><td>-20 to +20 °C</td><td>-30 to +10 °C</td><td>-60 to +30 °C</td></tr><tr><td>Laser wavelength</td><td>1067 nm</td><td>1064 nm</td><td>1064 nm</td></tr><tr><td>Energy on target</td><td>14 mJ</td><td>12 mJ</td><td>10 mJ</td></tr><tr><td>Repetition rate</td><td>3 Hz</td><td>3 Hz</td><td>1-3 Hz</td></tr><tr><td>Telescope type</td><td>Schmidt-Cassegrain</td><td>Schmidt-Cassegrain</td><td>Schmidt-Cassegrain</td></tr><tr><td>Telescope aperture</td><td>110 mm</td><td>107 mm</td><td>100 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Distance range</td><td>2-7 m</td><td>2-7 m</td><td>1.6-5 (or 7) m</td></tr><tr><td>Target acquisition</td><td>Mast gimbals</td><td>Mast gimbals</td><td>Periscope mirror</td></tr><tr><td>Spectrometer type</td><td>Czerny-Turner</td><td>Czerny-Turner &amp; Transmission</td><td>Czerny-Turner</td></tr><tr><td>Detectors</td><td>CCD</td><td>CCD and ICCD</td><td>CCD</td></tr><tr><td>Wavelength range</td><td>240-340, 385-850 nm</td><td>243-342, 382-468, 535-850</td><td>240-850 nm</td></tr><tr><td># of channels</td><td>6000</td><td>10,000</td><td>5400</td></tr><tr><td>Resolution, FWHM</td><td>0.15-0.65 nm</td><td>0.12-0.70 nm</td><td>0.19-0.45 nm</td></tr><tr><td>Onboard standards</td><td>10</td><td>22</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>Instrument mass</td><td>10.8 kg</td><td>10.8 kg</td><td>16.2 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Additional techniques</td><td>Imaging, passive VIS spectra</td><td>Imaging, Raman, VIS-IR spectra, Microphone</td><td>Imaging, VIS-IR spectra</td></tr></tbody></table>

Each instrument uses crossed Czerny-Turner (C-T) optical spectrometers to collect the LIBS spectra across several optical bands. Light is split into three wavelength bands by an optical demultiplexer prior to entering the spectrometers (Figure 5); between the demultiplexer and the spectrometers, fiber bundles transfer the light, with the bundle in a circular orientation at the receiving end and in a linear orientation at the spectrometer to maximize throughput at the spectrometer slit aperture [13,15,18]. The wavelength ranges
are generally the same among all three instruments, designed to cover the primary major-
element emission lines in the easily accessible optical range (240–850 nm). ChemCam and
SuperCam have gaps in the range and slightly higher optical resolution, while MarSCoDe
has complete coverage with generally slightly lower resolution in some portions of the
spectrum (Table 2). The density of emission lines in the ultraviolet portion of the spectrum
necessitates optical resolutions of <0.20 nm FWHM in this spectral range, while resolution
requirements are relaxed at longer wavelengths (Table 2). All three instruments use ungated
CCDs to collect the spectra with effective exposure times in the millisecond range. As noted
above, time gating of spectra to avoid quantification inaccuracy due to peak saturation is
not needed in the thin Mars atmosphere. SuperCam differs from the others in having a
transmission spectrometer and an intensified CCD (ICCD) for its longer-wavelength range,
while using simple C-T spectrometers and non-intensified CCDs in the lower spectral
ranges. The transmission spectrometer is used to accommodate remote time-resolved
Raman spectroscopy using a frequency-doubled green laser beam; the intensifier greatly
enhances the weak Raman signals coming from several meters away, and the time gating
to 100 ns effectively removes the ambient light and also allows time-resolved luminescence
observations [15,16,46]. For LIBS, the intensifier gain is reduced, and the time gating
is increased to 10 µs to capture all of the LIBS plasma. The transmission spectrometer
facilitates other types of LIBS experiments, such as plasma-induced luminescence (e.g., [47])
and strong intensification of the LIBS signal; however, very few of these types of LIBS
experiments have been conducted on Mars, with no notable results so far. To meet the
Raman spectroscopy requirements, the spectral resolution of the transmission spectrometer
was increased to ~0.30 nm FWHM in the range from 535 to 600 nm. This required the
projection of not one, but three simultaneous spectral traces onto the ICCD, resulting in
~10,000 channels for SuperCam overall, rather than the 5400–6000 channels in the other
two instruments (Table 2) [13,15,18].

Various materials and methods were used to ensure that the instruments are
lightweight and durable. The Mast Units of ChemCam and SuperCam were made mostly
of aluminum, including the telescope mirrors, while the mounting feet were made of
fiberglass to minimize heat loss [12,16]. The MarSCoDe Optical Head was made mostly
of carbon fiber composite [18]. ChemCam's Body Unit has a Mg electronics box and spec-
trometer housings made of beryllium to save weight [13], while SuperCam saved mass in
other ways and has spectrometers made of titanium for low thermal expansion [15]. The
masses of ChemCam and SuperCam are essentially identical (Table 2). The higher mass
of MarSCoDe includes the 2D Pointing Mirror constructed with silicon carbide (Al-SiC),
while the rovers' mast pointing gimbal assemblies are not accounted for in the mass of the
other two instruments.

Operationally, the instruments must work autonomously and robotically because sets
of commands are sent to Mars no more than once per day. Targets are selected based on
images relayed to the ground from other on-board cameras. Stereo cameras provide an
approximate distance to the targets (accurate within 1%-5%), used as a seed in achieving the
final focus. For all three instruments, the focus is adjusted by moving the small secondary
mirror of the telescope on a linear stage (Figure 5). ChemCam and MarSCoDe were
designed to autofocus using low-power continuous-wave (CW) diode lasers [12,18]. The
reflected beams were sensed as the secondary mirror was moved, providing a peak at the
best focus position. The instrument then autonomously moved the focus stage back to that
position to perform the LIBS analysis. ChemCam's CW autofocus laser failed two years
into the mission, and the team developed a new autofocus algorithm based on optimizing
the contrast in a central region of its images [48]. The imaging-based autofocus is more
accurate than the CW autofocus, and so imaging was baselined as the main focus method
for SuperCam, although there is also a CW autofocus option [16], which can be used in
low-light conditions such as down a drill hole or at night. Both ChemCam and SuperCam
investigate targets using a raster of observation points, generally 1 × 5 or 1 × 10 line scans
(Figure 6c), or a 2 × 2 or 3 × 3 grid, with points usually separated by 1–5 mm (Figure 6a;
the sample core marking shown in Figure 3 is not a normal analysis in this respect). If the
topography of the target results in a significant (e.g., >0.1%) change in the distance to the
target, additional autofocuses are included in the command sequence. MarSCoDe mostly
operated with single observation points on its targets (Figure 6d).

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Figure 6.** Close-up images of LIBS targets: (a) Gale crater Aeolus Palus conglomerate target Harrison shows cm-size light-toned feldspar crystals in one of the first felsic Noachian rocks examined up close by ChemCam. Red marks and numbers indicate the LIBS observation locations in a 4 × 4 raster. (b) Jezero crater-floor target Cine, analyzed by SuperCam, displays 1–2 mm olivine crystals indicative of a gravitational cumulate in the Seitah formation. Inset shows a close-up of the grains, which display altered rims, shown with sharpened image. (c) Gale crater Murray formation target Catabola is a protruding Ca-sulfate vein in fine-grained lacustrine mudstone bedrock. The vein contains boron, hinting at surface evaporation. Red marks indicate the locations of the LIBS raster. (d) MarSCoDe target shows a block with ventifact features in Utopia Planitia. Yellow arrow points to the location of LIBS analysis, which punched a hole in the soft material. Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/LANL/CNES/IRAP/MSSS/ASU (a,c); NASA/JPL-Caltech/LANL/CNES/IRAP (b); CNSA/NAOC/GRAS (c).
Standards were mounted on the rovers to ensure that accurate calibration is maintained. On each rover, one target consists of titanium; its large number of emission lines across the spectrum are used to check the wavelength calibration within ~0.02 nm. Other standards consist of geological targets, with SuperCam having the largest number of such targets (Table 2) [49,50]. In all cases, the elemental calibrations use a much larger library of standards observed using similar instruments on Earth, as described below.

## 2.3. *Data Processing and Calibrations*

The aim of LIBS data processing and calibration is to (1) identify the presence of elements above their detection threshold (such as for trace elements), and (2) quantify the chemical composition of the targets, i.e., for the major elements. Quantification of the major elements requires several critical pre-processing steps. These include accurate wavelength calibration (correcting for thermal drift in some cases in the extreme environment), despiking, removal of background including continuum, and—due to the broad range of distances—normalization. The normalization adds a significant degree of complexity (e.g., [51–53]) that is not generally needed in a laboratory environment in which distance and other environmental factors are usually held constant. For example, in the UV spectral range, samples with high iron result in low normalized peak areas of other elements due to the large number of iron peaks which greatly increase the total emission by which the spectrum is usually normalized. By comparison, a low-iron sample having the same abundance of the element in question will have a much higher normalized peak area due to the comparatively low number of emission peaks against which it is normalized. The calibration algorithms must be able to account for this phenomenon. Other normalizations are possible, such as to a single emission peak like oxygen, but in most of our work, they have resulted in less accurate calibration models.

Calibrations to provide elemental abundances from LIBS spectra follow similar treatments for ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe, all aimed at providing quantification of all the major elements, given as oxides (SiO₂, TiO₂, Al₂O₃, FeO, MgO, CaO, Na₂O, and K₂O), for most situations encountered by the rovers. (MnO was calibrated separately from the above elements for ChemCam and SuperCam [54–56]). All three rovers carry between ten and twenty-two LIBS calibration targets on board [13,28,49,50,57–59], and two targets (Shergottite and Norite; Table 3) [28] are shared among the rovers. Comparison spectra from all three instruments on Mars are shown in Figure 4b. All three teams use calibration transfer (e.g., [60]) to extend the calibration to larger sets of standards observed in laboratories. The calibration-transfer approach is necessitated by the need to cover a very large phase space from low to high abundances of all these elements without knowing in advance the ranges of compositions to be encountered. LIBS elemental calibrations can be quite accurate when covering only a small range in composition (e.g., [61]), but in this case we strive for complete coverage over the full ranges experienced on Mars. A partial solution to this dilemma is to use “sub-models” that cover narrower compositional ranges along with a global model that assigns the appropriate sub-model [61]. The major elements (Table 1) are determined using multivariate analysis (MVA) to take advantage of multiple emission lines for each element. The ChemCam and SuperCam teams started with spectral libraries built from a relatively small number of standards (<100 for ChemCam, <400 for SuperCam) and graduated to spectral libraries with much larger numbers of standards (>400 for ChemCam; >700 for SuperCam) once the ranges of approximate compositions encountered near the landing sites were understood [51–53]. The subsequent, expanded libraries were obtained with identical instruments in the laboratory, correcting for the relative instrument optical responses of the respective instruments (e.g., [13,15,62]). The standards were analyzed in chambers with Mars ambient atmospheric composition and
pressure. (Mars' atmosphere consists of 95% CO₂ at ~500 Pa pressure; after testing in Mars gas, we have defaulted to using pure CO₂ at that pressure). Transmission of the laser and plasma light through the chamber window was accounted for along with the instrument optical response corrections.

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Major-element compositions (major-element abundances in wt.%) of Shergottite and Norite glass standards, spectral portions of which are shown in Figure 4b.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>FeO<sub>T</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Shergottite standard</td><td>48.4</td><td>0.43</td><td>10.8</td><td>17.5</td><td>6.4</td><td>14.2</td><td>1.6</td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Norite standard</td><td>47.9</td><td>0.70</td><td>14.7</td><td>15.7</td><td>9.6</td><td>12.8</td><td>1.5</td><td>0.06</td></tr></tbody></table>

Based on average of EMPA and LA-ICP-MS measurements in Table 2 of [28].

MarSCoDe LIBS data processing used various algorithms to decode the surficial compositions. Liu et al. [5] employed a transfer learning approach by training multi-peak polynomial models on ChemCam lab data and performing data-level transfer from MarSCoDe to ChemCam enabled by the shared Norite target (Figure 4b; Table 3). Zhao et al. [63] incorporated simple univariate calibrations using onboard calibration observations of Norite. Chen et al. [64] established a probabilistic major-element calibration (PMEC) with pre-flight lab data from a suite of 93 certified samples obtained by the MarSCoDe flight model, where Natural Gradient Boosting regression [65] was used to determine the abundances and uncertainties of the major elements. These models were found to produce results with both systematic and data-based differences: the former may be related to the selection of the algorithms and the latter related to the models' robustness to data quality [41].

For minor and trace elements, calibration is often performed using only the strongest emission peak for that element. MVA is generally avoided, unless confined to a narrow spectral range, as it can improperly focus on geochemical affinities of elements with stronger peaks to the exclusion of the few weaker peaks of the element of interest. Derived compositions based on geochemical affinities can especially be wrong when all the standards are from one planet (Earth) that may not correctly represent the relationship between geochemically related elements on another planet. An example is Li and Mg, where Li tends to substitute for Mg in igneous minerals such as pyroxene, mica, and amphibole, but the Li abundances on Mars may be incorrectly predicted by MVA based on Mg abundances and the typical terrestrial Li/Mg ratio range present in terrestrial standards, which may not be the same on Mars. Geochemists using MVA must be aware of this issue. Some literature has, in the past, provided supposed abundances for elements when the emission peaks for the given element were in fact undetectable. The SuperCam team developed a "peak checker" algorithm that avoids providing MVA results when emission lines of the element in question are too weak or absent. Mars trace-element calibrations and results have been reported, in general, by [56,66–68]. These studies have mostly covered Li, Rb, and Sr; many other minor and trace elements have been calibrated individually (e.g., [34,36,68–73]) and some of those results are described in Section 3. Current and future work on minor and trace elements from MarSCoDe is focusing on the quantification of Mn, Ba, Cu [68], Co, and Ni.

For minor elements that are less easy to quantify with LIBS, e.g., H, C, F, P, S, and Cl, a number of techniques and special calibrations have been employed to yield scientific results. Using ChemCam and SuperCam, a first indication that a minor element has a high abundance in a LIBS observation is given by a low sum, well below 100 wt.%, of the eight major elements that are routinely quantified and that normally comprise >95 wt.% of the total abundance. Calibration of each of these minor elements for Mars is described here.
Hydrogen calibration for Mars presents unique challenges. After noting that powdered targets on Mars tend to yield higher H emission peaks than solid targets of the same material, ref. [74] studied various surface effects. They showed with laboratory experiments that surface roughness and the proximity of other materials to the LIBS plasma increases the H emission intensity. Excitation of material adsorbed on the surface just outside of the laser impact area but in contact with the plasma may play a role in this increased intensity. Hydrogen calibration at Mars pressure presents other challenges due to the potential for hydrated materials to change their hydration state when their surrounding environment is pumped from Earth pressure to that of Mars. Rapin et al. [72] conducted a careful study with materials of known hydration state, checked in the chamber with Raman spectroscopy, to provide a H calibration that is reliable for solid surfaces, e.g., smooth rock surfaces. Thomas et al. [75] followed with a H calibration using compositionally well-characterized, altered basaltic volcanic rocks for which the H contents were measured independently using thermogravimetric methods. Some of the results of studies using these H calibrations are discussed in Section 3.1.

Carbon abundances have been studied using C/O line intensity ratios [44,76]. The Mars atmosphere contains both of these elements, contributing their signatures to the plasma, so targets devoid of C typically have a characteristic C/O ratio, while carbon-bearing samples fall off of the line defining C vs. O emission intensities in C-free samples. The distance to the target affects the typical C/O ratio, so targets are binned according to distance, and a statistical test was used to define the threshold for detection of carbon in samples. SuperCam had the luxury of using several spectral techniques to search for carbon, and ultimately, LIBS results could be checked against Raman and VISIR reflectance spectroscopy, although the detection limit for the latter is in the 10s of wt.% carbonate [76,77].

Fluorine has only a few very weak atomic emission lines in the spectral range covered by the Mars LIBS instruments. However, the molecular emission band of CaF is readily observed in the 600–607 nm region [78]. This molecule and its emission band can be produced in the plasma even if the fluorine in the rock is not bound to Ca, as long as both elements are present. A calibration curve was developed to understand the occurrences and abundances of fluorapatite, which was observed in rocks in the floor of Gale crater [36]. ChemCam's detection limit is 0.2 wt.% F.

Sulfur calibration has taken several forms with ChemCam and SuperCam. Anderson et al. [79] used the ChemCam laboratory model to produce univariate calibration curves for 543 and 545.5 nm S emission lines that yielded detection limits for relatively low-Fe samples in the range of 1–8 wt.% S, but their calibration curves produced with mixtures of two different S-bearing salts resulted in lines with differing slopes with respect to the S abundances. Nachon et al. [31] used a rough sulfur calibration to show that S trended with Ca in light-toned veins that are ubiquitous in Gale crater. Their calibration was produced with a partial least squares (PLS) algorithm trained on spectra modified by summing areas under each spectral peak into a single channel [80] as a way to enhance the significance of the weak sulfur peaks in the ChemCam spectral range. This “peak-area MVA” method has been studied and applied subsequently (e.g., [81–85]). Rapin et al. [32] modeled the 543, 545.5 and 564 nm S peak areas and peak positions to account for Fe interferences, normalizing to the intensity of the 777 nm O triplet peak. The Rapin et al. model was developed using the ChemCam CaO concentrations in calcium sulfate veins on Mars to calculate the corresponding SO₃ compositions. They determined a detection limit of 4 wt.% S and used the method to identify Mg sulfates in that paper and later work, as will be described in Section 3.1. Following the methodology of [32], Zhang et al. [86] qualitatively analyzed the S abundances from MarSCoDe using the 564 nm peak
which is more prominent than those in the 543–546 nm range. A third method has been used for determining S abundances qualitatively with ChemCam and SuperCam. Referred to as “spectral unmixing” (SU), theoretical spectra are computationally formulated using the Saha-Boltzmann equation and radiative transfer, assuming appropriate plasma temperatures and electron densities. The SU scores are used as scalar values by which simulated elemental reference spectra are multiplied to fit the Mars LIBS spectral intensities. It has been used specifically for sulfur with ChemCam and SuperCam, but also for some other elements [87–91].

Chlorine calibration and its abundances in Mars targets have been the focus of several studies [34,35,79,92]. Similarly to fluorine, Cl yields molecular emission when combined with Ca. However, a study of that technique suggested that calibration of Cl using the intensity of its molecular line may be less reliable than for F [92]. Atomic-emission calibration curves were developed for Cl using the 837.8 nm peak, based on mixtures of salts and basalts, with detection limits of ~3–6 wt.% Cl for ChemCam [34] and ~0.6 wt.% Cl for SuperCam [35]. These calibrations have facilitated surveys of salt abundances along the traverses of these two rovers [34,35]. For MarSCoDe, even though no calibration has been established for Cl, Zhang et al. [86] identified Cl using this peak. It is prominent in MarSCoDe spectra with Cl abundances as low as 0.8 wt.%, observed with the GBW07447 standard during the lab test of the MarSCoDe flight model. One target showed a significant Cl signal (SNR > 3) during MarSCoDe’s operation on Mars (see Section 3.3).

No abundance calibration has been reported for phosphorous on Mars, although it has been observed in fluorapatites and diagenetic features in Gale crater [36–38], and so a current effort is underway (by F. Dimitracopoulos, private communication).

The respective Mars environments helped to dictate the chemical ranges of the standards observed in the laboratory to create the spectral libraries for use with the algorithms, both for the MVA algorithms used for the major elements and for the specialized studies for minor and trace elements. ChemCam explored a large crater lake in which much of the bedrock consisted of fine-grained sediments [93,94]. The range of compositions of the major elements was generally relatively limited, and relatively few coarse-grained minerals were observed, resulting in significant homogeneity (e.g., [95]), in part because the laser beam nearly generally interrogated multiple small grains, providing a mean composition. There are many exceptions, especially in terms of diagenetically emplaced or altered materials, as discussed below. MarSCoDe also analyzed an area of Mars that was overall relatively fine-grained and homogeneous [96]. SuperCam, on the other hand, started with coarse-grained igneous rocks, including gravitationally segregated cumulate rocks, and has observed rocks with extreme aqueous alteration as well, as discussed in Section 3. Grain size makes a significant difference in analyses, since sizes comparable to and larger than the laser beam will tend toward pure mineral compositions, while analyses of fine-grained rocks will tend toward bulk rock compositions [97].

The precisions of the ChemCam, SuperCam, and MarSCoDe instruments are significantly better than their corresponding accuracies, given the large compositional ranges that the derived abundances need to cover. For example, while accuracies of SiO₂ for ChemCam are generally around ±5 wt.% (exact accuracy varies with abundances), the precision is ±1.5 wt.% [52], indicating that the knowledge of one measurement relative to another is quite good even if the absolute abundance is not known as well. The accuracies are derived from a “test set” of standards that are held out of the calibration model, while the precision is determined by the standard deviation of multiple observations of the same target [51–53] or by comparison of single-pulse spectra from the same target [64]. As noted earlier, it would be possible in special cases to improve the accuracy to be closer to the precision if a
larger number of appropriate standards were used and if specific models were trained on a
small range of composition of interest.

Within the realm of LIBS applications, relatively few cover a large range of target dis-
tances. As noted earlier, normalization of the spectra is required for ChemCam, SuperCam,
and MarSCoDe due to the large range of overall intensities of the spectra at different dis-
tances. As the laser is focused at increasing distances, the size of the ablation spot increases
until at long enough distances, the deposited energy density is no longer sufficient to create
a plasma. ChemCam and SuperCam are mounted on the masts of their respective rovers,
a height of ~2 m above the ground, which sets the minimum distance to surface targets.
MarSCoDe's 2D pointing mirror was mounted lower to the ground, resulting in it being
closer to the nearest targets, and its observations were all within ~5 m of the instrument.
ChemCam can obtain spectra from bedrock to a distance of ~7 m, but it was found that it
can observe iron meteorites to ~10 m due to the improved optical coupling of Fe-Ni to the
laser [98]. SuperCam's telescope optics are improved relative to ChemCam, and ordinary
bedrock targets can be observed with LIBS to ~15 m; no iron meteorites have yet been
found in Jezero crater. Validated elemental abundances from ChemCam and SuperCam
are currently only provided to the public for shorter-distance targets (usually to 3.5 m for
ChemCam and to 6.5 m for SuperCam), to ensure that modeled uncertainties remain within
the specified values.

It has been shown with ChemCam that with increasing distance to a target, emission
lines having higher excitation potentials become weaker relative to emission lines with
lower excitation potentials [99,100], resulting in slight changes to elemental calibration as a
function of distance. Wiens et al. [101] provided empirical corrections for these trends for
several elements. SuperCam's major-element calibration does not show this same distance
effect [53,102], possibly because the MVA models are trained on more robust emission lines.

**3. Highlights from Three Mars Missions**

As a planetary body, Mars differs fundamentally from Earth in that it lacks plate tectonics and recent aqueous surface activity, resulting in a much more ancient surface overall on Mars than on Earth. The lack of plate tectonics may have also contributed to the loss of water and atmosphere, since none of the water or other volatiles trapped in hydrated sedimentary rocks has been returned to the surface (e.g., [103]). Thus, while Mars apparently was a habitable planet during the Noachian period, the Hesperian period that followed was one of increasing desiccation, and the Amazonian period has been mostly dry with relatively little activity (e.g., [1,2,104,105]). These details are illustrated in caricature in Figure 7, along with the relative time periods of the geological features explored by the Mars rovers. The overriding result of the Curiosity rover's exploration was the discovery that large lakes, rivers, and streams existed on Mars for long time scales of at least a million years between ~3.6 and 3.2 Ga [93,94]. The Perseverance rover was sent to Jezero crater, located between the Isidis Basin and the Nili-Syrtis igneous province. Jezero's age is estimated at 3.6–3.8 Ga, slightly younger than Isidis, which is estimated ~3.9 Ga ([4] and references therein). The goals of its exploration were (1) an ancient river delta, (2) an overlying unit that is uniquely carbonate-rich, (3) the first large (>20 km) crater rim to be explored, and (4) the ancient Noachian terrain outside the crater ([4] and references therein). By contrast, the Zhurong rover landed in a clearly younger terrain, dating ~3.1 Ga in the late Hesperian period (Figure 7), in a relatively flat terrain characterized by volcanic and potentially ice-related features. Some of these features include troughs, ridges, pitted cones, rampart craters, and pancake-like ejecta [106].
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Overview of the timing of various activities and events over the history of Mars. The four periods are labeled and color-coded. The locations of the rovers and their timelines indicate the time periods that each one has investigated. After [1,2,104,105].</figcaption></figure>

The subsections that follow give highlights from the LIBS observations; we follow up with a comparison of the overall compositions from the three LIBS missions.

### 3.1. LIBS Discoveries in an Ancient Lakebed: ChemCam in Gale Crater

The Curiosity rover landed in Gale crater (~4.5° S, 137.4° E) in 2012 (Figure 8a). With the very first LIBS laser pulse on Mars, the ChemCam team discovered that Mars' dust and soil are hydrated [107]. The hydrated component extends to the finest-grained airborne material that coats every surface. Hydration of this fine-grained component is ubiquitous, being seen at many places along both the Curiosity and Perseverance rovers' >30 km respective traverses. The hydration has been correlated with Mg and sulfur in ChemCam data, indicating that a significant carrier of water in the soil is a hydrated Mg sulfate [108]. The study did not rule out the possibility of adsorbed water and of other carriers of hydration in the fine-grained soil component, such as fine-grained clays or other hydrated constituents (e.g., [109]). Mars' soil consists of a range of grain sizes, with the coarser grain sizes more influenced by the local rocks [107, 110, 111]. In this way, LIBS revealed the physical weathering pathway of rocks to soils on Mars [110, 111].

Prior to the landing of Curiosity, Mars was thought to be a mostly mafic (Mg and Fe-rich) basaltic planet, bearing similarities to Earth's relatively dense oceanic crust, rich in olivine and pyroxene (e.g., [29]). However, upon landing in Gale crater, ChemCam observed many igneous clasts and small boulders rich in feldspar (e.g., Figure 6a). Gale crater is near the border of the southern highlands (e.g., [3] and references therein), the Noachian bedrock of which has been largely overlain by sediments and subsequent Hesperian lavas. Rocks washed down from Gale crater's rim to the north and observed in the early part of its traverse in Aeolis Palus (Figure 8a), provided the first opportunity for ground-based observations of Noachian highlands basement material, a detail of greater importance because infrared spectroscopy, as used for orbital surveys of Mars, is insensitive to feldspar. ChemCam was thus the first to observe the abundance of feldspars in the Noachian highland rocks [112–118]. Modeling of crustal density based on the InSight lander's seismic surveys has subsequently confirmed the existence of lower-density crust in the southern highlands (e.g., [119], consistent with feldspar-rich highlands basement rock.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Traverses of the three Mars rovers carrying LIBS experiments. Clockwise from upper right: (a) Curiosity rover (ChemCam) traverse in Gale crater, 35 km to date; (b) Perseverance rover (SuperCam) traverse in Jezero crater, 38 km to date; (c) Zhurong rover (MarSCoDe) traverse in Utopia Planitia to the end of the mission, ~2 km (red dots in Zhurong path represent rover stops with LIBS observations). Arrows show directions of travel. Panels (b,c) show the positions of the rovers as of sols 4614 and 1520, respectively (blue drops with rover symbols). Panel (b) shows the terminal location of the Ingenuity rotorcraft (blue drop with drone symbol) and the locations where samples were collected as part of the Mars Sample Return program (red icons). Maps are scaled individually according to the indicated scale bars. Credits: NASA/JPL/U. of Arizona/ESA (a,b); CNSA/NAOC/GRAS (c).</figcaption></figure>

The predominant bedrock along Curiosity's traverse has been sedimentary, and Chem-Cam's large number of observations was able to characterize variations in the inputs of
sediments (both fluvial and aeolian) to the lake that once occupied Gale crater. These inputs included a strong pulse of volcanic tridymite found at Marias Pass [120] (Figure 8a), and enrichments of the K-rich mineral sanidine at the Kimberley [121] (Figure 8a). The Kimberley was also enriched in some trace elements, particularly copper [71,122], leading to the suggestion of a copper porphyry deposit in a region upstream of Gale crater [71]. Farther along the traverse and higher in elevation, ChemCam observed a unique region rich in Mg sulfates and manganese, both thought to be remnants of ancient beach deposits [32,123]. These potential beach deposits were encountered as Curiosity continued to climb the lower slopes of Mt. Sharp (Figure 8a), which is a many kilometer-wide mound in the center of Gale crater. The ChemCam team has also used the elemental compositions to study the prevalence of clay minerals produced by aqueous alteration, both in the Murray formation [95,124] and in the Glen Torridon formation [125] (Figure 8a). The two methods used for this included the chemical index of alteration (CIA), which quantifies the relative enrichment of aluminum, an insoluble element that is concentrated by dissolution of other, more soluble elements [8,124,125]; the other method of estimating clay mineral abundances by LIBS elemental compositions was by tracking the abundances of lithium [95], which concentrates in clay minerals.

A final topic highlighted here is the characterization of diagenetic materials by ChemCam. Many diagenetic materials are fine scale, such as materials precipitated from groundwater and now filling veins in the rocks, and also nodules, often produced while sediments are still soft. ChemCam's small beam size allowed it to uniquely probe many of these materials (Figure 6c). Early in the mission, light-toned vein-filling materials were identified by ChemCam as Ca sulfates [31] while erosion-resistant ridges were enriched in Mg [126]. Boron and iron were discovered in Ca-sulfate veins farther along the rover traverse [70,127,128]. The iron suggests specific redox conditions, while the boron was likely re-precipitated from a time when the lake in Gale crater became dry. Manganese [129] was discovered along with zinc enrichments [69] in fracture fill material in the unique sanidine-enriched Kimberley region along the traverse [121] (Figure 8a). The precipitation of Mn, as well as the variable oxidation states of iron, indicate unique and as-yet not understand strong redox conditions. Silicon enrichments were observed in some localized rock fracture zones both above and below the Marias Pass (Figure 8a) stratigraphic level containing tridymite, indicating mobilization along fractures [120]. As the rover continued uphill into the clay-to-sulfate transition region on Mt. Sharp in 2022–2024 (Figure 8a), sediments first hosted some nodules containing sulfates. As the rover climbed, the density of nodules increased until the bedrock was effectively replaced by sulfates. This is apparently due to S-rich groundwater flowing downhill [130]. The discovery of small polygons with sulfate-rich ridges indicates high-frequency wet-dry cycles at the Noachian-Hesperian transition [131]. Curiosity continues to climb Mt. Sharp, and is currently encountering a region of boxworks, a patchwork of ridges which appear to be diagenetic in origin. The rover team has a goal of reaching the Yardang unit (e.g., [132]) seen as a lighter toned, wind-eroded region in the lower right corner of Figure 8a.

## 3.2. *Exploration of Jezero Crater: SuperCam on Perseverance*

The Perseverance rover landed in Jezero crater (18.4° N, 77.6° E) in 2021 and is exploring a very different terrain. While both Gale and Jezero craters were once lakes, the present-day floor of Jezero crater contains igneous bedrock, as determined by SuperCam LIBS [133,134] in collaboration with the other instruments and techniques. The Seitah formation, comprising a small portion of the floor (Figure 8b), is suggested to be an igneous cumulate, enriched in dense ~1.5 mm olivine and pyroxene grains (Figure 6b) that would have sunk to the bottom of a shallow magma chamber [133–135]. The Maaz
formation appears to overlie Seitah to the east and southwest and was produced by different lava flows and/or possibly pyroclastic flows of basaltic to basaltic-andesite compositions with relatively low Mg/Fe. The elemental compositions are consistent with mineralogies consisting mostly of Fe-rich augite and possibly ferrosilite along with plagioclase [136].

The river delta formation—one of the main goals of the mission—is relatively coarse-grained and contains boulders indicative of flash floods [137]. Compositions determined by SuperCam LIBS indicate that the delta front and the delta top (Figure 8b) consist mostly of olivine, pyroxene, and their alteration products. A portion of the delta front contains fine-grained minerals that, based on SuperCam infrared spectroscopy, are mostly phyllosilicates, while SuperCam also detected sulfur in portions of this interval, suggesting that the lake in Jezero crater experienced strong evaporation [138,139].

Above the delta formation at the base of the crater rim (Figure 8b), Jezero crater hosts a unit that was identified from orbital observations prior to landing as showing strong (likely lacustrine) carbonate signatures (e.g., [140,141]). Mars is an enigma because, other than Jezero crater, relatively little carbonate is observed from orbit even though carbon dioxide is the dominant gas in the atmosphere; by contrast, on Earth, where CO₂ is a very minor atmospheric constituent, carbonates readily precipitate and comprise a large fraction of all sedimentary rocks. Because of this paradox, the carbonate in Jezero crater's Margin Unit (Figure 8b) was a high priority for the mission. LIBS can detect carbon in targets, but as discussed in Section 2.3, it is not routinely quantified. Carbonates were first detected by SuperCam in the crater floor, though mostly on grain boundaries [76] (Figure 6b). In ongoing work, significantly larger amounts of carbonate were observed, as expected, in the Margin Unit (Figure 8b), with the combined techniques of SuperCam yielding an estimate of 11 ± 5% [77]. The Margin Unit appears to be igneous in nature and the lower portions were likely re-worked as beach sands, resulting in alteration to carbonate and excess silica [142,143].

Figure 8b also shows a brief detour into Neretva Vallis, the first river valley to be explored on another planet. The valley hosted a light-toned bedrock that is distinctly different in composition—very low in Mg and higher in Al [144]. It was in this location that organic carbon and reducing-chemistry spots rimmed by iron phosphates were discovered by other instruments on the rover, interpreted as a potential biosignature [145].

Finally, Perseverance is the first rover to scale the rim of a large (>20 km) crater. The climb (Figure 8b) started in the summer of 2024 and took Perseverance over 700 m above its landing site. Along the way, SuperCam's LIBS observed ultramafic compositions reminiscent of the crater floor in places, but also observed localized regions of significant hydrothermal alteration, such as a block of hydrothermally produced quartz, the positive identification of which was aided by SuperCam's Raman spectroscopy [146]. Separate regions are enriched in plagioclase [147–149] and at one location identified from orbit as a likely megabreccia block, preliminary analysis indicates that the surface is strongly enriched in serpentine whose identification (likely the chrysotile polymorph) was also aided by SuperCam's Raman and VISIR spectroscopy [150,151]. This variety of materials is generally expected of areas strongly affected by large impact processes. In addition to these mostly bedrock observations, SuperCam's LIBS characterized a class of light-toned float rocks scattered from the landing site to the crater rim; they have strikingly different LIBS spectra resulting from compositions consisting of almost exclusively Al and Si [152], some with ore-grade Ni enrichments to ~1 wt.% [153]. SuperCam's IR spectrometer helped to identify kaolinite along with Al spinel [152]. On Earth, kaolinite occurs as a result of intense aqueous alteration in a warm climate and exists along a weathering sequence in which soluble elements are progressively leached away, leaving the aluminum and silicon as the top layer of the sequence. This alteration can also occur due to hydrothermal
activity (e.g., [154], in which case the rocks would be expected to source from the crater rim; however, we did not find the source of these rocks along the traverse.

The Perseverance team is expecting to continue exploring the crater rim over the next couple of years. We expect the rover to have many years of life remaining, and large areas of the Nilli-Syrtis region of Mars could be explored.

### 3.3. Exploration of Utopia Planitia: MarSCoDe on the Zhurong Rover

The Zhurong rover landed on Mars in May 2021 in southern Utopia Planitia (25.066° N, 109.925° E) [155]. The rover traveled 2009 m southward (Figure 8c) [156] and conducted MarSCoDe LIBS and reflectance spectroscopy observations along the way. The landing area of Zhurong is located near the highland-lowland boundary of Mars with multiple suspected shorelines related to the ancient oceans covering the northern hemisphere [155]. The underlying geological unit, Vastitas Borealis Formation (VBF), is a late-Hesperian lowland unit of assumed depositional/volcanic origin [157]. At the landing area, the unit has undergone a potential Amazonian resurfacing event around 1.6 Ga ago based on crater chronology [96]. Observations from the Tianwen-1 orbiter revealed the presence of various geomorphologies including rampart craters, pitted cones, ridges, throughs, and transverse aeolian ridges (TARs) [155]. This terrain has experienced very low erosion rates (~1 m erosion in the last 1.1 Ga) [158]. The landing site can be considered to have recorded the most recent phase of Mars surface evolution dominated by the work of dust and wind (Figure 6) [159].

MarSCoDe probed 44 points over local blocks, soils, and TARs throughout its traverse. The blocks are mostly reddish-yellowish on their surfaces, with dark exposures [159,160]. Blocks of platy or vesicular morphology were spotted [5,63] and some surfaces appeared etched or grooved [160]. Multiple interpretations have been proposed regarding some of the blocks, including marine sediments [161], igneous rocks [5,63], salt duricrusts [162], and shaping as ventifacts [159,160]. The LIBS investigation of these blocks was partially hindered by the extensive and loose surface covering (Figure 6d) that complicated the focusing of the laser [41]. A LIBS quality index based on the atmospheric carbon line in LIBS spectra was thus developed. This enabled a comprehensive selection of Mars data with sufficient plasma excitation comparable to the lab database [41].

Local dark-toned blocks may be related to potential igneous rocks and their alteration. Liu et al. [5] argued for olivine dissolution in a low water-to-rock ratio related to the chemical alteration of basalt based on the trend indicated in a CNK-FM-A ternary diagram from the olivine endmember toward the feldspar endmember. This is roughly in line with the trend revealed by PMEC data (Figure 9c). Zhao et al. [63] identified a few blocks as of igneous origin but considered that only one was effectively probed by MarSCoDe. The existence of alteration products, such as certain forms of sulfates, were consistently inferred from LIBS results by either elevated cation elements [63,163] and/or low sums of the quantified elements [163] and were also hinted at by infrared reflectance spectra. It is worth noting that the interpretations among various authors could carry uncertainty that is partially inherited from the aforementioned uncertainty in the LIBS observation, which, combined with different modelling efforts (as mentioned in Section 2.3), causes some divergences in major element compositions as revealed by [41]. Furthermore, the relatively small number of MarSCoDe observations, limited by the rover resources, makes it challenging to identify definite trends and to classify materials with statistical significance.

The local soils appeared rough, with granular features in the images of Multispectral Camera (MSCam) and MarSCoDe's imager. Interestingly, these mm-scale granules in the soil could be blasted into finer particles (<100 µm) by LIBS shots, which distinguished its
nature from the coarse-grain layer armoring other features like the Rocknest sand shadow
in Gale crater [164].

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** Mars compositions, in molar units; (a) ChemCam compositions to Sol 4468; (b) SuperCam compositions to Sol 1256; (c) MarSCoDe data. Compositions of pure minerals or mineral groups are shown with blue circles (HCP = high-calcium pyroxene). The average composition of fine Mars dust [165] is indicated by a triangle.</figcaption></figure>

The TARs showed the coexistence of bright, smooth faces and dark, rough sections.
Occasionally, well-formed polygonal cracks developed on the bright faces, suggesting
cementation related to freeze–thaw-evaporation cycles [166]. Liu et al. [163] deduced from crater chronology that these TARs were formed 0.4–1.4 Ma ago. The later erosion of TARs, marked by the dark surfaces and asymmetric morphology, indicates a change in wind regime over time, indicating a change in climatic conditions as Mars’ obliquity shifted from high (>30°, denoted as the recent ice age on Mars, e.g., [167]) to the modern obliquity (~25°). Zhurong visited five TARs and four of them were probed by MarSCoDe [163]. MarSCoDe’s LIBS supported a cementation hypothesis with the identification of hydrogen and its preliminary quantification yielding sums of total oxides far less than 100 wt.% on the TAR targets, suggesting the presence of an unquantified element, such as S [163,166]. The cementation agent was hypothesized as gypsum based on the interpretation of MarSCoDe’s SWIR spectra [166].

MarSCoDe LIBS detected volatile elements, including H, S, and Cl in surface targets [63,86,166], although the abundances of these elements have not yet been quantified. The MarSCoDe targets of soils and TARs generally demonstrated elevated H signals, which may be related to hydrated minerals (e.g., sulfates) [63,166], water absorption [63], or the roughness effect found to enhance the H emission [74,86]. Zhang et al. [86] discovered a correlation between Ca and S among different targets which supports the wide-spread presence of gypsum. Their Cl analysis identified only one target with significant Cl emission around 838 nm over the surface of a block.

Trace-element abundances of Li, Sr, and Rb were reported from Zhurong [168]. The observed Li abundances are generally low (6–18 ppm) and show no positive correlation with CIA, implying an igneous origin. The Sr abundances range from 106 to 628 ppm but no correlation with other major elements is significant. The Rb abundances (22–87 ppm) correlate with Sr and K, which hints at the substitution of Rb in (alkali) feldspar phases. The relatively low Rb/K ratios are also in line with igneous rocks.

### 3.4. Synthesis: Comparison of All Mars Compositions

With three Mars missions and tens of thousands of LIBS observations, we can now compare and contrast the compositions of the landing sites, and of Earth and Mars in general. In Table 1 we see that Jezero crater is clearly the most mafic, especially enriched in MgO, and has the lowest SiO₂, Al₂O₃, CaO, and K₂O, consistent with its enrichment in olivine and low-Ca pyroxene (LCP). Based on MarSCoDe LIBS results, Utopia Planitia has the highest SiO₂ and TiO₂ of the three sites but is generally intermediate in the other elements. Comparison with the terrestrial crust illustrates the more mafic nature of Mars, represented at these three sites.

We gain a better understanding of the various inputs to these mean values from Figure 9, which presents molar abundances of the major elements on ternary diagrams on which the main igneous minerals and several of the weathering products are also labeled. With its generally more primitive compositions, Mars’ igneous rocks consist mostly of plagioclase, olivine, and pyroxene, the latter plotting between two different locations in this figure, depending on the abundance of calcium (high-Ca pyroxene, or HCP, and LCP).

There are a number of outlying points in Figure 9a, which we will describe next. In contrast to Earth’s evolved igneous systems, Mars apparently lacks igneous quartz; on the other hand, at Marias Pass in Gale crater (Figure 8a), ChemCam discovered nearly pure SiO₂ compositions that CheMin identified as tridymite, which on Earth occurs as a volcanic ash erupted from evolved magmas. Diagenetic material in fracture zones both stratigraphically above and below Marias Pass also contained silica enrichments, indicating post-depositional mobility of this material in groundwater [120,169,170]. This material can be seen near the high-silica apex of the Gale ternary diagram in Figure 9a. The Gale ternary plot also shows a significant trend toward plagioclase, essentially all from felsic
clasts observed in Bradbury Rise (Figure 8a), to where they had been fluvially transported from the crater rim. A trend to the lower right of Figure 9a indicates inputs of olivine and potentially also its weathering product, serpentine. While not found by LIBS in the Gale crater rocks themselves (at least not at the size of the LIBS laser beam in the rocks), olivine contributions were significantly found [111] in the Bagnold Dunes that Curiosity crossed on its way to Mount Sharp (Figure 8a). Another major trend is toward the lower left corner of Figure 9a, which is caused by the ubiquitous Ca-sulfate diagenetic material found in veins, and sometimes, in pore spaces of the rocks [31,171]. Data points scatter slightly to the right of the lower left corner, indicating contributions of Fe and Mg to the sulfates. These contributions were first seen as Fe enrichments along the edges of Ca-sulfate veins [127], but also as Mg sulfates. Curiosity has recently crossed into the sulfate unit higher on Mt. Sharp, where Mg sulfates pervade [130,172]. Overall, the relatively fine grain size of the Gale sediments results in limited scatter in the data points [173], with the above-mentioned trends being the main exceptions.

Addressing the main locus of points in Figure 9a, note first that it is essentially coincident in this diagram with the composition of Mars fine dust, which appears similar in both Gale and Jezero craters (e.g., [165,174,175]). In detail, Edwards et al. [176] discovered that the compiled compositions of the first 1000 sols in Gale show an igneous trachybasaltic endmember with 55.2 wt.% SiO₂, 19.8 wt.% Al₂O₃, and 9.3 wt.% (FeO+MgO), with a secondary, more basaltic locus of points for igneous targets that was nearly coincident with that of sedimentary targets, whose mean consists of 49.6 wt.% SiO₂, 14.3 wt.% Al₂O₃, and 24.5 wt.% (FeO+MgO), suggesting both less evolved rocks, consistent with MER findings (e.g., [177]) and the novel, more evolved Noachian highland rocks, discussed earlier. Bedford et al. [178] expanded on this study among the sedimentary bedrock of the Murray and Stimson formations, working to remove diagenetic effects, and extending the record to nearly 1500 sols. They proposed at least four fluvial inputs to the ancient Gale Lake, confirming those mentioned earlier [121,169,176]. The bulk of the Murray formation [95] and the clay-bearing Glen Torridon [125] southeast of Vera Rubin Ridge (Figure 8a) also fall closely within the tight locus of points in Figure 9a.

Jezero crater shows a significantly larger range of compositions in its ternary diagram (Figure 9b), due in part to the much larger grain sizes, which result in pure mineral compositions instead of mixtures due to multiple fine grains in the LIBS beam. Olivine is most abundant in the Seitah formation (Figure 9b) [135], but also in the delta top, the margin unit, and parts of the crater rim [77,142,143,149]. In preliminary analyses, serpentine was also observed in some regions of the delta front and the crater rim [150,151]. The Maaz formation of the crater floor (Figure 8b) and the Content member of the Seitah formation consist of plagioclase and LCP [136]. The delta top and the margin unit contain a significant fraction of carbonates (also some in Seitah) [76,77], resulting in a clear trend below and to the right of the olivine point (Figure 9b). Many Jezero crater rocks have a dark coating that has a similar composition to Mars dust, suggesting a possible origin as lithified dust [179,180], contributing to the cluster of points near the dust symbol (Figure 9b). Jezero crater contains only a few Ca sulfate diagenetic features, contributing to a small trend toward the lower left corner. Finally, a significant locus of points near the upper apex of the ternary diagram (Figure 9b) is attributed to a group of float rocks rich in kaolinite [152] and hydrothermal quartz in and near the crater rim [146], both mentioned earlier.

The MarSCoDe observations at Utopia Planitia, quantified by PMEC models [64], are shown on the Figure 9c ternary diagram. Consistent with other models [5,63], the compositions potentially indicate an igneous origin of local materials with limited acidic alteration as the data trend from olivine to plagioclase. This process could produce the sulphates observed by SWIR and account for the presence of hydrogen in the LIBS spectra.
However, our understanding is limited because of the small number of targets and the uncertainties due to (1) the data quality issue induced by focusing on loose materials; (2) the uncertainty of whether the LIBS penetrated the surface coverings or dust, as the points also surround the dust composition, and the single-laser-pulse MarSCoDe spectra are yet to be thoroughly analysed; and (3) the uncertainty of models, as no other instrument onboard Zhurong could verify the quantifications.

The compositions of all three missions are overplotted in Figure 10 for direct comparison. The more felsic nature of Gale crater is seen by the higher abundances of Na₂O, K₂O, and Al₂O₃, seen as red color (Gale) clustered above the black and blue points of Jezero and Utopia Planitia. Some of the same trends are seen in Figure 10 as were noted in Figure 9, such as the CaO vs. SiO₂ trend to the upper left (Figure 10d) indicating Ca-sulfate veins and pore filling, and trends to the highest Al₂O₃ (Figure 10c) in Jezero crater due to the kaolinite-rich float rocks. The plots of FeO_T and MgO (Figure 10a,b) are more complicated. The main groups of points near 40–50 wt.% SiO₂ and elevated FeO_T and MgO abundances indicate olivine and pyroxene minerals with various ratios of Fe/Mg. Trends toward elevated FeO_T and MgO with lower SiO₂ (Figure 10a,b) are due to carbonates in Jezero crater, which tend to be mixed Fe-Mg carbonates essentially without Ca. Part of the high-MgO, low-SiO₂ trend is also due to Mg sulfates, for example, observed at Hogwallow Flats at the Jezero delta front (Figure 8b) and interpreted as the result of intense evaporation of Jezero lake water [181]. The highest iron abundances (Figure 10a) indicate the presence of some iron oxide grains, essentially all at Jezero. Finally, a number of data points with relatively high Na₂O but low SiO₂ (Figure 10e) likely indicate halite and sodium perchlorate, suggested by associations with Cl [34], and by a Na-perchlorate Raman spectrum collected by SuperCam [133].

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Mars abundances of major elements plotted against SiO₂: (a) FeO<sub>total</sub>, (b) MgO, (c) Al₂O₃, (d) CaO, (e) Na₂O, (f) K₂O.</figcaption></figure>

**4. Summary and Future Prospects**

LIBS has been operating continuously on Mars since August 2012, and for a time, three instruments were operating on different sides of the red planet. ChemCam and SuperCam remain in operation, having determined the compositions of nearly 35,000 points on Mars. As such, the LIBS data set vastly exceeds that of any other instrument or technique for local elemental compositions. The technique can highlight broad trends within a given
landing site, as shown in Figures 9 and 10, and it can provide compositions of individual mineral grains and fine-scale diagenetic features such as hairline fractures. While the mafic nature of Mars was already well known, LIBS observations from Gale and Jezero craters and Utopia Planitia have shown the felsic tendencies of the Noachian crust in the southern highlands at Gale, and have found evaporative features such as boron, halite, and Ca and Mg sulfates. LIBS has found silica, Cu, Zn, and Mn enrichments. In Jezero crater, SuperCam LIBS has uniquely characterized kaolinitic rocks, determined the Mg numbers of various igneous flows, determined the carbonate content of the margin unit, and found nickel enrichments and hydrothermal quartz. In Utopia Planitia, LIBS showed a more felsic nature to the rocks and highlighted the potential hydrous process creating alteration products. LIBS has been a uniquely versatile technique on Mars.

We sincerely hope that Mars will become the steppingstone to other planetary bodies for the LIBS technique. A small LIBS instrument has already operated briefly on the Moon (e.g., [182]) on the Chandrayaan-3 mission. Work is underway to produce more capable, miniature (<2 kg) LIBS instruments (e.g., [183]) that could travel on a Mars helicopter or on small lunar or asteroidal rovers. LIBS holds particular promise for studying icy regions (e.g., [184]) due to its unique capabilities in quantifying H, C, N, and O to characterize various types of mixtures between water ice, CO₂ ice, frozen methane, ethane, other organic mixtures, and mixtures of ice and rocky particles. For this reason, we believe that some of LIBS's greatest promise may be in exploring the poles of the Moon, cometary bodies, the asteroid Ceres, and ocean worlds such as Europa and Enceladus. The sky is no longer the limit for LIBS.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation: all; lab results: S.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation: R.C.W.; writing—review and editing: A.C., O.G., Z.C. and S.M.; visualization: R.C.W., A.C., O.G., S.M., Z.C. and R.S.; supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition: all. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded in the US by NASA Mars Exploration Program contracts NNH15A35I, NNH15AZ24I, and NNH13ZDA018O to R.C.W. and S.M.C. Research in France was funded by CNES, CNRS, and UT for A.C., O.G., Z.C. and S.M. Additional funding for Z.C. comes from Project (JLFS/P-702/24) of Hong Kong RGC Co-funding Mechanism on Joint Laboratories with the Chinese Academy of Science.

**Data Availability Statement:** All data used in this work are in the open literature and/or at official data repositories such as the NASA Planetary Data System (PDS).

**Acknowledgments:** The work of several thousand people to develop and operate the instruments, the Mars rovers, and the launch, cruise, and landing vehicles is gratefully acknowledged.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

## Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

<table><tr><td>2D</td><td>Two dimensional</td></tr><tr><td>APXS</td><td>Alpha particle x-ray spectrometer</td></tr><tr><td>CCD</td><td>Charge coupled device</td></tr><tr><td>CIA</td><td>Chemical index of alteration</td></tr><tr><td>CNES</td><td>Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (France)</td></tr><tr><td>CNSA</td><td>China National Space Administration</td></tr><tr><td>C-T</td><td>Czerny-Turner</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>CWL</td><td>Continuous-wave laser</td></tr><tr><td>EMPA</td><td>Electron microprobe analyzer</td></tr><tr><td>FWHM</td><td>Full width at half maximum</td></tr><tr><td>HCP</td><td>High-calcium pyroxene</td></tr><tr><td>ICCD</td><td>Intensified charge coupled device</td></tr><tr><td>IR</td><td>Infrared</td></tr><tr><td>LA-ICP-MS</td><td>Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer</td></tr><tr><td>LCP</td><td>Low-calcium pyroxene</td></tr><tr><td>LIBS</td><td>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</td></tr><tr><td>MVA</td><td>Multivariate analysis</td></tr><tr><td>NASA</td><td>National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA)</td></tr><tr><td>PMEC</td><td>Probabilistic major-element calibration</td></tr><tr><td>RMI</td><td>Remote Micro-Imager</td></tr><tr><td>SWIR</td><td>Short-wavelength infrared</td></tr><tr><td>TAR</td><td>Transverse aeolian ridge</td></tr><tr><td>UV</td><td>Ultraviolet</td></tr><tr><td>VBF</td><td>Vastitas Borealis Formation</td></tr><tr><td>VISIR</td><td>Visible and infrared</td></tr><tr><td>XRF</td><td>X-ray fluorescence</td></tr></table>

## References

1. Carr, M.H.; Head, J.W., III. Geologic History of Mars. *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.* **2010**, *294*, 185–203. [CrossRef]

2. Ehlmann, B.; Edwards, C.S. Mineralogy of the Martian surface. *Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.* **2014**, *42*, 291–315. [CrossRef]

3. Grotzinger, J.P.; Crisp, J.; Vasavada, A.R.; Anderson, R.C.; Baker, C.J.; Barry, R.; Blake, D.F.; Conrad, P.; Edgett, K.S.; Ferdowski, B.; et al. Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2012**, *170*, 5–56. [CrossRef]

4. Farley, K.A.; Williford, K.H.; Stack, K.M.; Bhartia, R.; Chen, A.; de la Torre, M.; Hand, K.; Goreva, Y.; Herd, C.D.K.; Hueso, R.; et al. Mars 2020 mission overview. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2021**, *216*, 142. [CrossRef]

5. Liu, C.; Ling, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Fu, X.; Qiao, L.; Liu, P.; Li, B.; Zhang, L.; et al. Aqueous alteration of the Vastitas Borealis Formation at the Tianwen-1 landing site. *Commun. Earth Environ.* **2022**, *3*, 280. [CrossRef]

6. Malin, M.C.; Edgett, K.S. Sedimentary rocks of early Mars. *Science* **2000**, *290*, 1927–1937. [CrossRef]

7. MEPAG Mars Scientific Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities. In *White Paper*; Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG): Washington, WA, USA, 2005; p. 31. Available online: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/mepag/reports/reports/MEPAG goals_08-08-05.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

8. Nesbitt, H.W.; Young, G.M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistries of lutites. *Nature* **1984**, *299*, 715–717. [CrossRef]

9. Clark, B.C.; Baird, A.K.; Rose, H.J., Jr.; Priestley, T., III; Keil, K.; Castro, A.J.; Kelliher, W.C.; Rowe, C.D.; Evans, P.H. Inorganic analyses of Martian surface samples at the Viking landing sites. *Science* **1976**, *194*, 1283–1288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10. Gellert, R.; Clark, B.C., III. The MSL and MER Science Group. In situ compositional measurements of rocks and soils with the Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer on NASA’s Mars rovers. *Elements* **2015**, *11*, 39–44. [CrossRef]

11. Wiens, R.C.; Cremers, D.A.; Blacic, J.D.; Ritzau, S.M.; Funsten, H.O.; Nordholt, J.E. Elemental and isotopic planetary surface analysis at stand-off distances using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and laser-induced plasma ion mass spectrometry. In Proceedings of the 29th Lunar Planet Science Conference, Houston, TX, USA, 16–20 March 1998. Available online: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/LPSC98/pdf/1633.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

12. Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Saccoccio, M.; Barraclough, B.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Mangold, N.; Baratoux, D.; Bender, S.; Berger, G.; et al. The ChemCam Instruments on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Science Objectives and Mast Unit. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2012**, *170*, 95–166. [CrossRef]

13. Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S.; Barraclough, B.; Saccoccio, M.; Barkley, W.C.; Bell, J.F., III; Bender, S.; Bernardin, J.; Blaney, D.; Blank, J.; et al. The ChemCam Instruments on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Performance. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2012**, *170*, 167–227. [CrossRef]

14. Mustard, J.F.; Adler, M.; Allwood, A.; Bass, D.S.; Beaty, D.W.; Bell, J.F., III; Brinckerhoff, W.B.; Carr, M.; Des Marais, D.J.; Drake, B.; et al. *Report of the Mars 2020 Science Definition Team*; Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG): Boulder, CO, USA, 2013; p. 154. Available online: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/mepag/reports/reports/MEP/Mars_2020_SDT_Report_Final.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).
15. Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S.; Robinson, S.H.; Nelson, A.E.; Cais, P.; Bernardi, P.; Newell, R.T.; Clegg, S.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Storms, S.; et al. The SuperCam Instrument Suite on the NASA Mars 2020 Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2021**, *217*, 4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Bernardi, P.; Cais, P.; Robinson, S.; Nelson, T.; Gasnault, O.; Reess, J.-M.; Deleuze, M.; Rull, F.; et al. The SuperCam instrument suite on the Mars 2020 rover: Science objectives and mast-unit description. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2021**, *217*, 47. [CrossRef]

17. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. *Origins, Worlds, and Life: A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology* 2023–2032; The National Academies Press: Washington, WA, USA, 2022. [CrossRef]

18. Xu, W.; Liu, X.; Yan, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Kuang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.; Yang, F.; Liu, C.; et al. The MarSCoDe Instrument Suite on the Mars Rover of China's Tianwen-1 Mission. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2021**, *217*, 64. [CrossRef]

19. Wiens, R.C.; Wan, X.; Lasue, J.; Maurice, S. Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Planetary Science. In *Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy*, 2nd ed.; Singh, J.P., Thakur, S.N., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 441–471.

20. Saeidfirozeh, H.; Kubelik, P.; Laitl, V.; Krivkova, A.; Vrabel, J.; Rammelkamp, K.; Schroeder, S.; Gornushkin, I.B.; Kepes, E.; Zabka, J.; et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in space applications: Review and prospects. *Trends Anal. Chem.* **2024**, *181*, 117991. [CrossRef]

21. Lasue, J.; Wiens, R.C.; Clegg, S.M.; Vaniman, D.T.; Joy, K.H.; Humphries, S.; Mezzacappa, A.; Melikechi, N.; McInroy, R.E.; Bender, S. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for lunar exploration. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2012**, *117*, E01002. [CrossRef]

22. Yumoto, K.; Cho, Y.; Kameda, S.; Kasahara, S.; Sugita, S. In-situ measurement of hydrogen on airless planetary bodies using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2023**, *205*, 106696. [CrossRef]

23. Dyar, M.D.; Ytsma, C.R.; Lepore, K. Geochemistry by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy on the Moon: Accuracy, Detection Limits, and Realistic Constraints on Interpretations. *Earth Spa. Sci.* **2024**, *11*, e2024EA003635. [CrossRef]

24. Sallé, B.; Lacour, J.-L.; Vors, E.; Fichet, P.; Maurice, S.; Cremers, D.A.; Wiens, R.C. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for Mars surface analysis: Capabilities at stand-off distance and detection of chlorine and sulfur elements. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2004**, *59*, 1413–1422. [CrossRef]

25. Sallé, B.; Cremers, D.A.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Fichet, P. Evaluation of a compact spectrograph for in-situ and stand-off laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analyses of geological samples on Mars missions. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2005**, *60*, 805–815. [CrossRef]

26. Clegg, S.M.; Wiens, R.C.; Misra, A.K.; Sharma, S.K.; Lambert, J.; Bender, S.; Newell, R.; Nowak-Lovato, K.; Smrekar, S.; Dyar, M.D.; et al. Planetary geochemical investigations by Raman-LIBS spectroscopy (RLS). *Spectrochim. Acta* **2014**, *68*, 925–936. [CrossRef]

27. Martin, N.D.; Manelski, H.T.; Wiens, R.C.; Clegg, S.; Hansen, P.B.; Schröder, S.; Chide, B. LIBS Peak Broadening in Soils on Mars. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1151.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

28. Fabre, C.; Maurice, S.; Cousin, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Forni, O.; Sautter, V.; Guillaume, D. Onboard calibration igneous targets for the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover and the Chemistry Camera Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy instrument. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2011**, *66*, 280–289. [CrossRef]

29. Taylor, S.R.; McLennan, S.M. *Planetary Crusts: Their Origin, Evolution, and Composition*; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; p. 378.

30. Dyar, M.D.; Tucker, J.M.; Humphries, S.; Clegg, S.M.; Wiens, R.C.; Lane, M.D. Strategies for Mars remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of sulfur in geological samples. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2010**, *66*, 39–56. [CrossRef]

31. Nachon, M.; Clegg, S.M.; Mangold, N.; Schroeder, S.; Kah, L.C.; Dromart, G.; Ollila, A.; Johnson, J.; Oehler, D.; Bridges, J.; et al. The MSL Science Team; Calcium sulfate veins characterized by the ChemCam instrument at Gale crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2014**, *119*, 1991–2016. [CrossRef]

32. Rapin, W.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Dromart, G.; Schieber, J.; Thomas, N.H.; Fischer, W.W.; Fox, V.K.; Stein, N.T.; Nachon, M.; Clark, B.C.; et al. An interval of high salinity in ancient Gale crater lake, Mars. *Nat. Geosci.* **2019**, *12*, 889–895. [CrossRef]

33. Forni, O.; Rapin, W.; Sklute, E.C.; Gasda, P.; Loche, M.; Hughes, E.B.; Schröder, S.; Rammelkamp, K.; Gasnault, O.; Lanza, N.L. Elemental sulphur deposit and its related enrichments as viewed by ChemCam. In Proceedings of the 56th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/1476.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

34. Thomas, N.H.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Rapin, W.; Anderson, D.E.; Rivera-Hernandez, F.; Forni, O.; Schroeder, S.; Cousin, A.; Mangold, N.; et al. Mars Science Laboratory observations of chloride salts in Gale crater, Mars. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2019**, *46*, 10754–10763. [CrossRef]

35. Wolf, Z.U.; Madariaga, J.M.; Clegg, S.; Legett, C.; Arana, G.; Gabriel, T.S.J.; Poblacion, I.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Anderson, R.; et al. Chlorine in Jezero crater, Mars: Detections made by SuperCam. In Proceedings of the 56th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/2456.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).
36. Forni, O.; Gaft, M.; Toplis, M.; Clegg, S.M.; Sautter, V.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Mangold, N.; Gasnault, O.; Sautter, V.; et al. First detection of fluorine on Mars: Implications on Gale crater's geochemistry. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2015**, *42*, 1020–1028. [CrossRef]

37. Meslin, P.-Y.; Forni, O.; Loche, M.; Fabre, S.; Lanza, N.; Gasda, P.; Treiman, A.; Berger, J.; Cousin, A.; Gasnault, O.; et al. Overview of secondary phosphate facies observed by ChemCam in Gale crater, Mars. *EGU Gen. Assem.* **2022**, EGU22-6613. [CrossRef]

38. Treiman, A.H.; Lanza, N.L.; VanBommel, S.; Berger, J.; Wiens, R.C.; Bristow, T.; Johnson, J.; Rice, M.; Hart, R.; McAdam, A.; et al. Manganese-Iron Phosphate Nodules at the Groken site, Gale Crater, Mars. *Minerals* **2023**, *13*, 1122. [CrossRef]

39. Wiens, R.C. MSL Mars ChemCam LIBS Spectra 4/5 RDR V1.0. In *NASA Planetary Data System; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2022*. [CrossRef]

40. Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S. Mars 2020 SuperCam bundle. In *NASA Planetary Data System; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2021*. [CrossRef]

41. Chen, Z.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; Pilleri, P.; Gasnault, O.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Ren, X.; et al. Quality index for Martian in-situ laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2024**, *216*, 106921. [CrossRef]

42. Lodders, K.; Fegley, B., Jr. *The Planetary Scientist's Companion*; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998; p. 400.

43. Ullan, A.; Zorzano, M.-P.; Martin-Torres, F.J.; Valentín-Serrano, P.; Kahanpaa, H.; Harri, A.-M.; Gomez-Elvira, J.; Navarro, S. Analysis of the wind pattern and pressure fluctuations during one and a half Martian years at Gale Crater. *Icarus* **2017**, *288*, 78–87. [CrossRef]

44. Beck, P.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Fau, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Lasue, J.; Cousin, A.; Schröder, S.; Maurice, S.; Rapin, W.; et al. Detectability of carbon with ChemCam LIBS: Distinguishing sample from Mars atmospheric carbon, and application to Gale crater. *Icarus* **2023**, *408*, 115840. [CrossRef]

45. Fouchet, T.; Reess, J.-M.; Montmessin, F.; Hassen-Khodja, R.; Nguyen-Tuong, N.; Humeau, O.; Jacquinod, S.; Lapauw, L.; Parisot, J.; Bonafous, M.; et al. The SuperCam Infrared Spectrometer for the Perseverance rover of the Mars 2020 mission. *Icarus* **2022**, *373*, 114773. [CrossRef]

46. Lopez-Reyes, G.; Manrique, J.-A.; Clavé, E.; Ollila, A.; Beyssac, O.; Pilleri, P.; Bernard, S.; Dehouck, E.; Veneranda, M.; Sharma, S.K.; et al. Supercam Raman activities at Jezero crater, Mars: Observational strategies, data processing, and mineral detections during the first 1000 sols. *ESS Open Archive* **2025**. [CrossRef]

47. Clavé, E.; Gaft, M.; Motto-Ros, V.; Fabre, C.; Forni, O.; Beyssac, O.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Bousquet, B. Extending the potential of Plasma Induced Luminescence spectroscopy. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2021**, *177*, 106111. [CrossRef]

48. Peret, L.; Gasnault, O.; Dingler, R.; Langevin, Y.; Bender, S.; Blaney, D.; Clegg, S.; Clewans, C.; Delapp, D.; Donny, C.; et al. Restoration of the autofocus capability of the ChemCam instrument onboard the Curiosity rover. In *Proceedings of the SpaceOps Conference, Daejeon, Republic of Korea*, 16–20 May 2016. [CrossRef]

49. Manrique, J.A.; Lopez-Reyes, G.; Cousin, A.; Rull, F.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Madsen, M.B.; Madariaga, J.M.; Gasnault, O.; Aramendia, J.; et al. SuperCam calibration targets: Design and development. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2020**, *216*, 138. [CrossRef]

50. Cousin, A.; Sautter, V.; Fabre, C.; Dromart, G.; Montagnac, G.; Drouet, C.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Gasnault, O.; Beyssac, O.; Bernard, S.; et al. SuperCam calibration targets on board the Perseverance rover: Fabrication and quantitative characterization. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2022**, *188*, 106341. [CrossRef]

51. Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S.; Lasue, J.; Forni, O.; Anderson, R.B.; Clegg, S.; Bender, S.; Barraclough, B.L.; Deflores, L.; Blaney, D.; et al. The ChemCam Team Pre-flight calibration and initial data processing for the ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory rover. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2013**, *82*, 1–27. [CrossRef]

52. Clegg, S.M.; Wiens, R.C.; Anderson, R.B.; Forni, O.; Frydenvang, J.; Lasue, J.; Pilleri, A.; Payre, V.; Boucher, T.; Dyar, M.D.; et al. Recalibration of the Mars Science Laboratory ChemCam instrument with an expanded geochemical database. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2017**, *129*, 64–85. [CrossRef]

53. Anderson, R.B.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Clegg, S.M.; Frydenvang, J.; Gabriel, T.S.J.; Ollila, A.; Schroeder, S.; Beyssac, O.; et al. Post-landing major element quantification using SuperCam laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2022**, *188*, 106347. [CrossRef]

54. Gasda, P.J.; Anderson, R.B.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Clegg, S.M.; Ollila, A.M.; Lanza, N.; Lamm, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S.; et al. Quantification of manganese in ChemCam Mars and laboratory spectra using a multivariate model. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2021**, *181*, 106223. [CrossRef]

55. Gasda, P.J.; Anderson, R.B.; Dubey, M.; Oyen, D.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Clegg, S.M.; Ollila, A.M.; Lanza, N.L.; Wiens, R.C.; et al. Multivariate and ensemble manganese calibration models for SuperCam. In *Proceedings of the 53rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA*, 7–11 March 2022. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2022/pdf/1646.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

56. Gabriel, T.S.J.; Forni, O.; Anderson, R.B.; Manrique, J.-A.; Vogt, D.; Gasda, P.; Schröder, S.; Ollila, A.; Cousin, A.; Udry, A.; et al. The SuperCam Instrument Team Machine Learning Trace Element Quantification for SuperCam Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Implications for Rocks and Return Samples from Jezero Crater, Mars. *Spectrochim. Acta B*, 2025; in preparation.
57. Vaniman, D.; Dyar, M.D.; Wiens, R.C.; Ollila, A.; Lanza, N.; Lasue, J.; Rhodes, M.; Clegg, S.M. Ceramic ChemCam Calibration Targets on Mars Science Laboratory. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2012**, *170*, 229–255. [CrossRef]

58. Madariaga, J.M.; Aramendia, J.; Arana, G.; Gomez-Nubla, L.; Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo, S.; Castro, K.; Garcia-Florentino, C.; Maguregui, M.; Torre-Fdez, I.; Manrique, J.A.; et al. Homogeneity assessment of the SuperCam calibration targets. *Anal. Chim. Acta* **2022**, *1209*, 339837. [CrossRef]

59. Liu, X.; Xu, W.; Qi, H.; Ren, X.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Yan, Z.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Development and Testing of the MarSCoDe LIBS Calibration Target in China's Tianwen-1 Mars Mission. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2023**, *219*, 43. [CrossRef]

60. Boucher, T.; Dyar, M.D.; Mahadevan, S. Proximal methods for calibration transfer. *Chemometrics* **2017**, *31*, e2877. [CrossRef]

61. Anderson, R.B.; Clegg, S.M.; Frydenvang, J.; Wiens, R.C.; McLennan, S.; Morris, R.V.; Ehlmann, B.; Dyar, M.D. Improved accuracy in quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using sub-model partial least squares. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2017**, *129*, 49–57. [CrossRef]

62. Legett, C., IV; Newell, R.T.; Reyes-Newell, A.L.; Nelson, A.E.; Bernardi, P.; Bener, S.C.; Forni, O.; Venhaus, D.M.; Clegg, S.M.; Ollila, A.M.; et al. Optical calibration of the SuperCam instrument body unit spectrometers. *Appl. Opt.* **2022**, *61*, 2967. [CrossRef]

63. Zhao, Y.Y.S.; Yu, J.; Wei, G.; Pan, L.; Liu, X.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, C.; Qang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. In situ analysis of surface composition and meteorology at the Zhurong landing site on Mars. *Natl. Sci. Rev.* **2023**, *10*, nwad056. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

64. Chen, Z.; Ren, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, W. Probabilistic multivariable calibration for major elements analysis of MarSCoDe Martian laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument on Zhurong rover. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2022**, *197*, 106529. [CrossRef]

65. Duan, T.; Anand, A.; Ding, D.Y.; Thai, K.K.; Basu, S.; Ng, A.; Schuler, A. NGBoost: Natural gradient boosting for probabilistic prediction. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, 12–18 July 2020; pp. 2690–2700.

66. Ollila, A.M.; Newsom, H.E.; Clark, B., III; Wiens, R.C.; Cousin, A.; Blank, J.G.; Mangold, N.; Sautter, V.; Maurice, S.; Clegg, S.M.; et al. The MSL Science Team Trace element geochemistry (Li, Ba, Sr, and Rb) using Curiosity's ChemCam: Early results for Gale crater from Bradbury Landing Site to Rocknest. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2014**, *119*, 255–285. [CrossRef]

67. Payre, V.; Fabre, C.; Cousin, A.; Sautter, V.; Wiens, R.C.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Lasue, J.; Ollila, A.; Rapin, W.; et al. Alkali trace elements with ChemCam: Calibration update and geological implications of the occurrence of alkaline rocks in Gale crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2017**, *122*, 650–679. [CrossRef]

68. Luo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Ren, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, W.; et al. Quantification and geological implications of manganese, barium, and copper observed by MarSCoDe LIBS at Zhurong landing site on Mars. *Icarus*, 2025; to be submitted.

69. Lasue, J.; Clegg, S.M.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Lanza, N.; Mangold, N.; Le Deit, L.; Fabre, C.; Gasnault, O.; et al. Observation of > 5 wt. % zinc at the Kimberley outcrop, Gale crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2016**, *121*, 338–352. [CrossRef]

70. Gasda, P.J.; Haldeman, E.B.; Wiens, R.C.; Rapin, W.; Bristow, T.F.; Bridges, J.C.; Schwenzer, S.P.; Clark, B.; Herkenhoff, K.; Frydenvang, J.; et al. In situ detection of boron by ChemCam on Mars. *Geophys. Rev. Lett.* **2017**, *44*, 8739–8748. [CrossRef]

71. Payré, V.; Fabre, C.; Sautter, V.; Cousin, A.; Mangold, N.; Le Deit, L.; Forni, O.; Goetz, W.; Wiens, R.C.; Gasnault, O.; et al. Copper enrichments in Kimberley formation, Gale crater, Mars: Evidence for a Cu deposit at the source. *Icarus* **2019**, *321*, 736–751. [CrossRef]

72. Rapin, W.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Laporte, D.; Chauviré, B.; Gasnault, O.; Schroeder, S.; Beck, P.; Bender, S.; et al. Quantification of water content by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy on Mars. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2017**, *130*, 82–100. [CrossRef]

73. Manelski, H.; Wiens, R.C.; Broz, A.; Hurowitz, J.A.; Tice, M.; Clegg, S.; Dehouck, E.; Randazzo, N.; Connell, S.A.; Forni, O.; et al. Ore-grade nickel co-located with redox-organic interactions in Neretva Vallis, Mars. *Nat. Geosci.* 2025; in review.

74. Rapin, W.; Bousquet, B.; Lasue, J.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Lacour, J.-L.; Fabre, C.; Wiens, R.C.; Frydenvang, J.; Dehouck, E.; Maurice, S.; et al. Roughness effects on the hydrogen signal in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2017**, *137*, 13–22. [CrossRef]

75. Thomas, N.H.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Anderson, D.E.; Clegg, S.M.; Forni, O.; Schroeder, S.; Rapin, W.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Lasue, J.; Delapp, D.M.; et al. Characterization of hydrogen in basaltic materials with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for application to MSL ChemCam data. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2018**, *123*, 1996–2021. [CrossRef]

76. Clavé, E.; Benzerara, K.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Forni, O.; Royer, C.; Mandon, L.; Beck, P.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Beyssac, O.; Cousin, A.; et al. The SuperCam team Carbonate Detection with SuperCam in Igneous Rocks on the floor of Jezero Crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2023**, *128*, e2022JE007463. [CrossRef]

77. Clavé, E.; Forni, O.; Royer, C.; Mandon, L.; Dehouck, E.; Mangold, N.; Bedford, C.; Udry, A.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Schroder, S.; et al. The SuperCam Team Diverse aqueous processes recorded in the carbonate-rich rocks in Jezero Crater. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets*, 2025; to be submitted.
78. Gaft, M.; Nagli, L.; Eliezer, N.; Groisman, Y.; Forni, O. Elemental analysis of halogens using molecular emission by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in air. *Spectrochim. Acta* **2014**, *98*, 39–47. [CrossRef]

79. Anderson, D.E.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Forni, O.; Clegg, S.M.; Cousin, A.; Thomas, N.H.; Lasue, J.; Delapp, D.M.; McInroy, R.E.; Gasnault, O.; et al. Characterization of LIBS emission lines for the identification of chlorides, carbonates, and sulfates in salt/basalt mixtures for the application to MSL ChemCam data. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2017**, *122*, 744–770. [CrossRef]

80. Clegg, S.M.; Wiens, R.C.; Barefield, J.E.; Sklute, E.; Dyar, M.D. Multivariate analysis of remote laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy spectra using partial least squares, principal component analysis, and related techniques. *Spectrochim. Acta* **2009**, *B64*, 79–88. [CrossRef]

81. Clegg, S.M.; Anderson, R.B.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Frydenvang, J.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C. Sulfur chemical analysis and interpretation with ChemCam on the Curiosity rover. In Proceedings of the 48th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 20–24 March 2017. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2017/pdf/2439.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

82. Clegg, S.M.; Anderson, R.B.; Rapin, W.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Anderson, D.E.; Thomas, N.H.; Gasda, P.; Frydenvang, J.; Forni, O.; Newsom, H.; et al. ChemCam sulfur quantitative analysis and interpretation. In Proceedings of the 49th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 19–23 March 2018. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2018/pdf/2576.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

83. Clegg, S.M.; Anderson, R.B.; Rapin, W.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Anderson, D.E.; Thomas, N.H.; Gasda, P.; Frydenvang, J.; Forni, O.; Newsom, H.; et al. ChemCam sulfur quantitative analysis of the Askival altered feldspathic cumulate target, Gale crater, Mars. In Proceedings of the 50th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 18–22 March 2019. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/2768.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

84. Clegg, S.M.; Frydenvang, J.; Anderson, R.B.; Vaniman, D.T.; Gasda, P.; Forni, O.; Newsom, H.; Blaney, D.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C. Quantitative sulfur chemistry observed on diverse samples from sols 1800–2300. In Proceedings of the 51th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 16–20 March 2020. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2020/pdf/2561.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

85. Hoffman, M.E.; Newsom, H.E.; Clegg, S.M.; Gasda, P.J.; Lanza, N.; Gasnault, O.; Wiens, R.C.; Delapp, D.M. ChemCam sulfur abundances in the Knockfarril Hill member, Gale crater Mars. In Proceedings of the 54th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 13–17 March 2023. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2023/pdf/2660.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

86. Zhang, Y.; Ren, X.; Chen, Z.; Luo, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, W.; Shu, R.; et al. Volatile Elements Characterized by MARSCOD in Materials at Zhurong Landing Site. *Astron. J.* **2024**, *168*, 150. [CrossRef]

87. Schröder, S.; Rammelkamp, K.; Hansen, P.B.; Seel, F.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Pilleri, P.; Rapin, W.; et al. Semiquantitative analysis of ChemCam and SuperCam LIBS data with spectral unmixing. In Proceedings of the 54th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 13–17 March 2023. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2023/pdf/2014.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

88. Schröder, S.; Rammelkamp, K.; Hansen, P.B.; Seel, F.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Rapin, W.; Dehouck, E.; et al. Insights to Minor and Trace Element Content in ChemCam LIBS Data with Spectral Unmixing. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 11–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1866.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

89. Schröder, S.; Clavé, E.; Hansen, P.B.; Rammelkamp, K.; Seel, F.; Hübers, H.-W.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Pilleri, P.; et al. Identification of Minor and Trace Element Enhancements in SuperCam LIBS Data with Spectral Unmixing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mars, Pasadena, CA, USA, 22–25 July 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/tenthmars2024/pdf/3413.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

90. Schröder, S.; Clavé, E.; Hansen, P.B.; Rammelkamp, K.; Seel, F.; Hübers, H.-W.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Pilleri, P.; et al. Minor and Trace Element Enhancements Identified in SuperCam LIBS Data with Spectral Unmixing. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 11–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/2011.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

91. Schröder, S.; Clavé, E.; Mandon, L.; Beck, P.; Beyssac, O.; Hansen, P.B.; Rammelkamp, K.; Seel, F.; Forni, O.; Dehouck, E.; et al. Iron-sulfur containing mineral phase identified in Jezero's northern margin unit with SuperCam LIBS data and spectral unmixing. In Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/2094.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

92. Vogt, D.S.; Rammelkamp, K.; Schroeder, S.; Huebers, H.W. Molecular emission in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: An investigation of its suitability for chlorine quantification on Mars. *Icarus* **2018**, *302*, 470–482. [CrossRef]

93. Grotzinger, J.P.; Gupta, S.; Rubin, D.M.; Schieber, J.; Sumner, D.Y.; Stack, K.M.; Vasavada, A.R.; Arvidson, R.E.; Calef, F., III; Edgar, L.; et al. Deposition, exhumation, and paleoclimate of an ancient lake deposit, Gale crater, Mars. *Science* **2015**, *350*, aac7575. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
94. Vasavada, A.R. Mission Overview and Scientific Contributions from the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity Rover After Eight Years of Surface Operations. *Spa. Sci. Rev.* **2022**, *218*, 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

95. Frydenvang, J.; Mangold, N.; Wiens, R.C.; Fraeman, A.A.; Edgar, L.A.; Fedo, C.; L'Haridon, J.; Bedford, C.; Gupta, S.; Grotzinger, J.P.; et al. The chemostratigraphy of Murray formation bedrock and role of diagenesis at Vera Rubin Ridge in Gale crater, Mars, as observed by the ChemCam instrument. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2020**, *125*, e2019JE006320. [CrossRef]

96. Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Du, J.; Liu, Z.; Yan, X.; Xu, R.; He, Z.; et al. Geological characteristics of China's Tianwen-1 landing site at Utopia Planitia, Mars. *Icarus* **2021**, *370*, 114657. [CrossRef]

97. McCanta, M.C.; Dobosh, P.A.; Dyar, M.D.; Newsom, H.E. Testing the veracity of LIBS analyses on Mars using the LIBSSIM program. *Planet. Spa. Sci.* **2013**, *81*, 48–54. [CrossRef]

98. Johnson, J.R.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Bell, J.F., III; Wiens, R.C.; Maurice, S.; Gasnault, O. Progress on iron meteorite detections by the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover. In Proceedings of the 51st Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 16–20 March 2020. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2020/pdf/1136.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

99. Melikechi, N.; Mezzacappa, A.; Cousin, A.; Lanza, N.L.; Clegg, S.M.; Wiens, R.C.; Berger, G.; Maurice, S.; Bender, S.; Forni, O.; et al. The MSL Science Team Correcting for variable-target distances of ChemCam LIBS measurements using emission lines of Martian dust spectra. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2014**, *96C*, 51–60. [CrossRef]

100. Mezzacappa, A.; Melikechi, N.; Cousin, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Lasue, J.; Clegg, S.M.; Tokar, R.; Bender, S.; Lanza, N.L.; Maurice, S.; et al. The MSL Science Team Application of distance correction to ChemCam LIBS measurements. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2016**, *120*, 19. [CrossRef]

101. Wiens, R.C.; Blazon-Brown, A.; Melikechi, N.; Frydenvang, J.; Dehouck, E.; Clegg, S.M.; Delapp, D.; Anderson, R.B.; Cousin, A.; Maurice, S. Improving ChemCam LIBS Long-Distance Elemental Compositions Using Empirical Abundance Trends. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2021**, *182*, 106247. [CrossRef]

102. Manelski, H.T.; Wiens, R.C.; Schröder, S.; Hansen, P.B.; Bousquet, B.; Clegg, S.; Martin, N.D.; Nelson, A.E.; Martinez, R.K.; Ollila, A.M.; et al. LIBS Plasma Diagnostics with SuperCam on Mars: Implications for Quantification of Elemental abundances. *Spectrochim. Acta B* **2024**, *222*, 107061. [CrossRef]

103. Scheller, E.L.; Ehlmann, B.L.; Hu, R.; Adams, D.J.; Yung, Y.L. Long-term drying of Mars by sequestration of ocean-scale volumes of water in the crust. *Science* **2021**, *372*, 56–62. [CrossRef]

104. Golombek, M.P.; Grant, J.A.; Crumpler, L.S.; Greeley, R.; Arvidson, R.E.; Bell, J.F., III; Weitz, C.M.; Sullivan, R.; Christensen, P.R.; Soderblom, L.A.; et al. Erosion rates at the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites and long-term climate change on Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2006**, *111*, E12S10. [CrossRef]

105. Arvidson, R.E. Aqueous history of Mars as inferred from landed mission measurements of rocks, soils, and water ice. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2016**, *121*, 1602–1626. [CrossRef]

106. Ye, B.; Qian, Y.; Xiao, L.; Michalski, J.R.; Lia, Y.; Wu, B.; Qiao, L. Geomorphologic exploration targets at the Zhurong landing site in the southern Utopia Planitia of Mars. *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.* **2021**, *576*, 117199. [CrossRef]

107. Meslin, P.-Y.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Schröder, S.; Cousin, A.; Berger, G.; Clegg, S.M.; Lasue, J.; Maurice, S.; Sautter, V.; et al. The MSL Science Team Soil diversity and hydration as observed by ChemCam at Gale crater, Mars. *Science* **2013**, *341*, 1238670. [CrossRef]

108. David, G.; Dehouck, E.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Rapin, W.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Lasue, J.; Mangold, N.; Beck, P.; et al. Evidence for amorphous sulfates as the main carrier of soil hydration in Gale crater, Mars. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2022**, *49*, e2022GL098755. [CrossRef]

109. Valantinas, A.; Mustard, J.F.; Chevrier, V.; Mangold, N.; Bishop, J.L.; Pommerol, A.; Beck, P.; Poch, O.; Applin, D.M.; Cloutis, E.A.; et al. Detection of ferrihydrite in Martian red dust records ancient cold and wet conditions on Mars. *Nat. Commun.* **2025**, *16*, 1712. [CrossRef]

110. Cousin, A.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Wiens, R.C.; Rapin, W.; Mangold, N.; Fabre, C.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Tokar, R.; Lasue, J.; et al. The MSL Science Team; Compositions of coarse and fine particles in Martian soils at Gale: A window into the production of soils. *Icarus* **2015**, *249*, 22–42. [CrossRef]

111. Cousin, A.; Dehouck, E.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; Bridges, N.; Ehlmann, B.; Williams, A.; Stein, N.; Schroeder, S.; et al. Geochemistry of the Bagnold Dune Field as observed by ChemCam, and comparison with other Aeolian deposits at Gale crater. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2017**, *122*, 2144–2162. [CrossRef]

112. Sautter, V.; Fabre, C.; Forni, O.; Toplis, M.; Cousin, A.; Ollila, A.M.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Maurice, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Mangold, N.; et al. The MSL Science Team Igneous mineralogy at Bradbury rise: The first ChemCam campaign. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2014**, *119*, 30–46. [CrossRef]

113. Sautter, V.; Toplis, M.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Wiens, R.C.; Fabre, C.; Gasnault, O.; Fisk, M.; Maurice, S.; Ollila, A.; et al. In-situ evidence for continental crust on early Mars. *Nat. Geosci.* **2015**, *8*, 605–609. [CrossRef]
114. Sautter, V.; Toplis, M.J.; Beck, P.; Mangold, N.; Wiens, R.C.; Pinet, P.; Cousin, A.; Maurice, S.; Le Deit, L.; Hewins, R.; et al. Magmatic complexity on early Mars as seen through a combination of orbital, in situ, and meteorite data. *Lithos* **2016**, *254–255*, 36–52. [CrossRef]

115. Mangold, N.; Thompson, L.; Forni, O.; Fabre, C.; Le Deit, L.; Wiens, R.C.; Williams, A.; Williams, R.; Anderson, R.B.; Blaney, D.L.; et al. Composition of conglomerates analyzed by the Curiosity rover: Implications for Gale crater crust and sediment sources. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2016**, *121*, 353–387. [CrossRef]

116. Mangold, N.; Williams, A.; Clegg, S.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Ming, D.; Gellert, R.; McLennan, S.; Cousin, A.; Grotzinger, J.P.; et al. Classification scheme for sedimentary and igneous rocks in Gale crater, Mars. *Icarus* **2017**, *284*, 1–17. [CrossRef]

117. Cousin, A.; Sautter, V.; Payré, V.; Forni, O.; Mangold, N.; Gasnault, O.; Le Deit, L.; Johnson, J.; Maurice, S.; Salvatore, M.; et al. Classification of igneous rocks analyzed by ChemCam at Gale crater, Mars. *Icarus* **2017**, *288*, 265–283. [CrossRef]

118. Bowden, D.L.; Bridges, J.C.; Cousin, A.; Rapin, W.; Semprich, J.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Gasda, P.; Das, D.; Payré, V.; et al. Askival: An altered feldspathic cumulate sample in Gale crater. *Met. Planet. Sci.* **2022**, *101*, 1–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

119. Wieczorek, M.A.; Broquet, A.; McLennan, S.M.; Rivoldini, A.; Golombek, M.; Antonangeli, D.; Beghein, C.; Giardini, D.; Gudkova, T.; Gyalay, S.; et al. InSight Constraints on the Global Character of the Martian Crust. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2022**, *127*, e2022JE007298. [CrossRef]

120. Frydenvang, J.; Gasda, P.J.; Hurowitz, J.A.; Grotzinger, J.P.; Wiens, R.C.; Newsom, H.E.; Bridges, J.; Maurice, S.; Fisk, M.; Elhmann, B.; et al. Diagenetic silica enrichment and late-stage groundwater activity in Gale crater, Mars. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2017**, *44*, 4716–4724. [CrossRef]

121. Le Deit, L.; Anderson, R.B.; Blaney, D.L.; Clegg, S.M.; Cousin, A.; Dromart, G.; Fabre, C.; Fisk, M.; Forni, O.; Gasnault, O.; et al. The potassic sedimentary rocks in Gale crater, Mars, as seen by ChemCam on board Curiosity. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2016**, *121*, 784–804. [CrossRef]

122. Goetz, W.; Dehouck, E.; Gasda, P.J.; Johnson, J.R.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Lanza, N.L.; Wiens, R.C.; Rapin, W.; Frydenvang, J.; Payré, V.; et al. Detection of copper by the ChemCam instrument along Curiosity's traverse in Gale crater, Mars: Elevated abundances in Glen Torridon. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2023**, *128*, e2021JE007101. [CrossRef]

123. Gasda, P.J.; Lanza, N.L.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Lamm, S.N.; Cousin, A.; Anderson, R.; Forni, O.; Swanner, E.; L'Haridon, J.; Frydenvang, J.; et al. Manganese-rich sandstones as an indicator of ancient oxic lake water conditions in Gale crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2024**, *129*, e2023JE007923. [CrossRef]

124. Mangold, N.; Dehouck, E.; Fedo, C.; Forni, O.; Achilles, C.; Bristow, T.; Frydenvang, J.; Gasnault, O.; L'Haridon, J.; Le Deit, L.; et al. Chemical alteration of fine-grained sedimentary rocks at Gale crater. *Icarus* **2019**, *321*, 619–631. [CrossRef]

125. Dehouck, E.; Cousin, A.; Mangold, N.; Frydenvang, J.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Rapin, W.; Gasda, P.J.; Bedford, C.; Caravaca, G.; et al. In situ geochemical characterization of the clay-bearing Glen Torridon region of Gale crater, Mars, using the ChemCam instrument. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2022**, *127*, e2021JE007103. [CrossRef]

126. Leveille, R.J.; Cousin, A.; Lanza, N.; Ollila, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Mangold, N.; Forni, O.; Bridges, J.; Berger, G.; Clark, B.; et al. Chemistry of fracture-filling raised ridges in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater: Windows in to past aqueous activity and habitability on Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2014**, *119*, 2398–2415. [CrossRef]

127. L'Haridon, J.; Mangold, N.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Johnson, J.R.; Rapin, W.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; Payré, V.; Dehouck, E.; Nachon, M.; et al. Chemical variability in mineralized veins observed by ChemCam on the lower slopes of Mount Sharp in Gale crater, Mars. *Icarus* **2018**, *311*, 69–86. [CrossRef]

128. Nellessen, M.A.; Gasda, P.; Crossey, L.; Peterson, E.; Ali, A.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, W.; Hao, M.; Spilde, M.; Newsom, H.; et al. Boron adsorption in clay minerals: Implications for Martian groundwater chemistry and boron on Mars. *Icarus* **2023**, *401*, 115599. [CrossRef]

129. Lanza, N.L.; Wiens, R.C.; Arvidson, R.E.; Clark, B.C.; Fischer, W.W.; Gellert, R.; Grotzinger, J.P.; Hurowitz, J.A.; McLennan, S.M.; Morris, R.V.; et al. Oxidation of manganese in an ancient aquifer, Kimberley formation, Gale crater, Mars. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2016**, *43*, 7398–7407. [CrossRef]

130. Frydenvang, J.; Nikolajsen, K.W.; Dehouck, E.; Gasda, P.J.; Clegg, S.M.; Bryk, A.B.; Edgar, L.A.; Rapin, W.; Forni, O.; Cloutis, E.; et al. Geochemical variations observed by the ChemCam instrument as the Curiosity rover transitioned from clay-mineral to sulfate-mineral rich regions on Aeolis Mons in Gale crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets*, 2025; in preparation.

131. Rapin, W.; Dromart, G.; Clark, B.C.; Schieber, J.; Kite, E.S.; Kah, L.C.; Thompson, L.M.; Gasnault, O.; Lasue, J.; Meslin, P.-Y.; et al. Sustained wet-dry cycling on early Mars. *Nature* **2023**, *620*, 299–302. [CrossRef]

132. Dromart, G.; Le Deit, L.; Rapin, W.; Gasnault, O.; Le Mouelic, S.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Mangold, N.; Rubin, D.; Lasue, J.; Maurice, S.; et al. Deposition and erosion of the light-toned yardang unit of Mt. Sharp, Gale crater, Mars Science Laboratory Mission. *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.* **2020**, *554*, 116681. [CrossRef]

133. Wiens, R.C.; Udry, A.; Beyssac, O.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Mangold, N.; Cousin, A.; Mandon, L.; Bosak, T.; Forni, O.; McLennan, S.M.; et al. The SuperCam Team Compositionally and density stratified igneous terrain in Jezero crater, Mars. *Sci. Adv.* **2022**, *8*, eabo3399. [CrossRef]
134. Farley, K.A.; Stack Morgan, K.M.; Shuster, D.L.; Horgan, B.H.N.; Tarnas, J.D.; Simon, J.I.; Sun, V.Z.; Scheller, E.L.; Moore, K.R.; McLennan, S.M.; et al. Aqueously altered igneous rocks on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars. *Science* **2022**, *377*, eabo2196. [CrossRef]

135. Beyssac, O.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; Udry, A.; Kah, L.C.; Mandon, L.; Clavé, E.; Liu, Y.; Poulet, F.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; et al. Petrological traverse of the olivine cumulate Séítah formation at Jezero crater; Mars: A perspective from SuperCam onboard Perseverance. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2023**, *128*, e2022JE007638. [CrossRef]

136. Udry, A.; Ostwald, A.; Sautter, V.; Cousin, A.; Beyssac, O.; Forni, O.; Dromart, G.; Benzerara, K.; Nachon, M.; Horgan, B.; et al. The SuperCam team A Mars 2020 Perseverance SuperCam Perspective on the Igneous Nature of the Máaz formation at Jezero crater and link with Séítah, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2023**, *128*, e2022JE007440. [CrossRef]

137. Mangold, N.; Gupta, S.; Gasnault, O.; Dromart, G.; Tarnas, J.D.; Sholes, S.F.; Horgan, B.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Brown, A.J.; Le Mouelic, S.; et al. The Mars 2020 Science Team Evidence for a delta-lake system and ancient flood deposits at Jezero crater, Mars, from the Perseverance rover. *Science* **2021**, *374*, 711–717. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

138. Dehouck, E.; Forni, O.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Beck, P.; Mangold, N.; Royer, C.; Clavé, E.; Beyssac, O.; Johnson, J.R.; Mandon, L.; et al. The SuperCam Team Overview of the bedrock geochemistry and mineralogy observed by SuperCam during Perseverance's delta front campaign. In *Proceedings of the 54th Lunar Planetary Science Conference*, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 13–17 March 2023. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2023/pdf/2862.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

139. Bosak, T.; Shuster, D.L.; Scheller, E.L.; Siljeström, S.; Zawaski, M.J.; Mandon, L.; Simon, J.I.; Weiss, B.P.; Stack, K.M.; Mansbach, E.N.; et al. Other members of the Mars 2020 Science Team; Astrobiological potential of rocks acquired by the Perseverance rover at a sedimentary fan front in Jezero crater, Mars. *AGU Adv.* **2024**, *5*, e2024AV001241. [CrossRef]

140. Horgan, B.H.N.; Anderson, R.B.; Dromart, G.; Amador, E.S.; Rice, M.S. The mineral diversity of Jezero crater: Evidence for possible lacustrine carbonates on Mars. *Icarus* **2020**, *339*, 113526. [CrossRef]

141. Zastrow, A.M.; Glotch, T.D. Distinct Carbonate Lithologies in Jezero Crater, Mars. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2021**, *48*, e2020GL092365. [CrossRef]

142. Williford, K.H.; Farley, K.A.; Horgan, B.; Garczynski, B.; Treiman, A.H.; Gupta, S.; Jones, A.J.; Siljeström, S.; Cardarelli, E.; Clavé, E.; et al. Carbonated ultramafic rocks in Jezero crater, Mars. *Science*, 2025; accepted.

143. Bedford, C.C.; Ravanis, E.; Clavé, E.; Wiens, R.C.; Forni, O.; Jones, A.; Royer, C.; Garczynski, B.; Beck, P.; Connell, S.; et al. Investigating the origin and variable diagenetic overprint of the Margin Unit in Jezero crater, Mars, with SuperCam. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets*, 2025; in preparation.

144. Mandon, L.; Forni, O.; Mangold, N.; Wiens, R.C.; Manelski, H.; Wolf, U.; Dehouck, E.; Beck, P.; Beyssac, O.; Johnson, J.R.; et al. Diagenetically altered fine sediments at Neretva Vallis, Mars. In *Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference*, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/1400.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

145. Hurowitz, J.A.; Tice, M.M.; Allwood, A.C.; Cable, M.L.; Hand, K.P.; Murphy, A.E.; Uckert, K.; Bell, J.F., III; Bosak, T.; Broz, A.P.; et al. Redox-Driven Mineral and Organic Associations in Jezero Crater, Mars. *Science*, 2025; accepted.

146. Beck, P.; Dehouck, E.; Beyssac, O.; Bernard, S.; Mandon, L.; Royer, C.; Clavé, E.; Forni, O.; Pineau, M.; Francis, R.; et al. From hydrated silica to quartz: Potential hydrothermal precipitates found in Jezero crater, Mars. *Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.* **2025**, *656*, 119256. [CrossRef]

147. Udry, A.; Beyssac, O.; Forni, O.; Clave, E.; Bedford, C.; Beck, P.; Dehouck, E.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Motta, G.; Cousin, A.; et al. Igneous compositions in the rim of Jezero crater using SuperCam data. In *Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference*, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/1352.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

148. Quantin-Nataf, C.; Dehouck, E.; Beck, P.; Bedford, C.; Mandon, L.; Beyssac, O.; Clave, E.; Forni, O.; Udry, A.; Mayhew, L.; et al. Alteration diversity observed in the inner part of Jezero Crater Rim. In *Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference*, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/2189.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

149. Bedford, C.C.; Wiens, R.C.; Horgan, B.H.N.; Klidaras, A.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Udry, A.; Alwmark, S.; Herd, C.D.K.; Ravanis, E.; Treiman, A.; et al. Geological diversity in the Jezero crater rim investigated with SuperCam: Insights into impact processes on Mars. In *Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference*, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/2495.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

150. Comellas, J.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Gasda, P.J.; Cousin, A.; Essunfeld, A.; Mayhew, L.E.; Fryer, P.; Sun, L.; Brown, A.J.; Acosta-Maeda, T.E.; et al. Serpentinization in Jezero Crater: Comparing SuperCam Mars Data to Terrestrial Serpentinites. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets*, 2025; in preparation.

151. Quantin-Nataf, C.; Dehouck, E.; Clavé, E.; Beck, P.; Johnson, J.; Mayhew, L.; Mandon, L.; Forni, O.; Beyssac, O.; Mangold, N.; et al. The SuperCam team; Serpentinized megablock exposed in Jezero crater rim. 2025; in preparation.

152. Royer, C.; Bedford, C.C.; Johnson, J.R.; Horgan, B.; Broz, A.; Forni, O.; Connell, S.; Wiens, R.C.; Mandon, L.; Kathir, B.S.; et al. Intense alteration on early Mars revealed by high-aluminum rocks at Jezero Crater. *Nat. Earth Environ.* **2024**, *5*, 671. [CrossRef]
153. Forni, O.; Bedford, C.C.; Royer, C.; Liu, Y.; Wiens, R.C.; Udry, A.; Dehouck, E.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Beyssac, O.; Beck, P.; et al. Nickel-Copper Deposits On Mars: Origin And Formation. In Proceedings of the The Tenth International Conference on Mars, Pasadena, CA, USA, 22–25 July 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/tenthmars2024/pdf/3131.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

154. Ece, O.I.; Ercan, H.U. Global occurrence, geology and characteristics of hydrothermal-origin kaolin deposits. *Minerals* **2024**, *14*, 353. [CrossRef]

155. Liu, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, R.; Rao, W.; Cui, X.; Geng, Y.; Jia, Y.; Huang, H.; Ren, X.; Yan, W.; et al. Geomorphic contexts and science focus of the Zhurong landing site on Mars. *Nat. Astron.* **2022**, *6*, 65–71. [CrossRef]

156. Wan, W.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Di, K.; Peng, M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Hu, G.; Han, S.; Li, X.; et al. Visual Localization and Topographic Mapping for Zhurong Rover in Tianwen-1 Mars Mission. *IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens.* **2025**, *18*, 6393–6408. [CrossRef]

157. Tanaka, K.L.; Skinner, J.A., Jr.; Dohm, J.M.; Irwin, R.P., III; Kolb, E.J.; Fortezzo, C.M.; Platz, T.; Michael, G.G.; Hare, T.M. Geologic map of Mars. *Sci. Investig. Map* **2014**, 3292, 43. [CrossRef]

158. Chen, Z.; Wu, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, Z.; Yang, C.; Dong, J.; Rao, W. Rock abundance and erosion rate at the Zhurong landing site in southern Utopia Planitia on Mars. *Earth Spa. Sci.* **2022**, *9*, e2022EA002252. [CrossRef]

159. Chen, Z.; Caravaca, G.; Loche, M.; Chide, B.; Kurfis-Pal, B.; Zhang, J.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Guo, L.; Lasue, J.; et al. Unexpected Aeolian Buildup Illustrates Low Modern Erosion Along Zhurong Traverse on Mars. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1308.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

160. Ding, L.; Zhou, R.; Yu, T.; Gao, H.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.-Y.S.; et al. Surface characteristics of the Zhurong Mars rover traverse at Utopia Planitia. *Nat. Geosci.* **2022**, *15*, 171–176. [CrossRef]

161. Xiao, L.; Huang, J.; Kusky, T.; Head, J.W.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Yu, W.; Shi, Y.; Wu, B.; et al. Evidence for marine sedimentary rocks in Utopia Planitia: Zhurong rover observations. *Natl. Sci. Rev.* **2023**, *10*, nwad137. [CrossRef]

162. Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Y.Y.S.; Pan, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; et al. Zhurong reveals recent aqueous activities in Utopia Planitia, Mars. *Sci. Adv.* **2022**, *8*, eabn8555. [CrossRef]

163. Liu, J.; Qin, X.; Ren, X.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wu, H.; Chen, Z.; Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; et al. Martian dunes indicative of wind regime shift in line with end of ice age. *Nature* **2023**, *620*, 303–309. [CrossRef]

164. Minitti, M.E.; Kah, L.C.; Yingst, R.A.; Edgett, K.S.; Anderson, R.C.; Beegle, L.W.; Carsten, J.L.; Deen, R.G.; Goetz, W.; Hardgrove, C.; et al. MAHLI at the Rocknest sand shadow: Science and science-enabling activities. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2013**, *118*, 2338–2360. [CrossRef]

165. Lasue, J.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Cousin, A.; Forni, O.; Anderson, R.; Beck, P.; Clegg, S.M.; Dehouck, E.; Frydenvang, J.; Gasda, P.; et al. The SuperCam Team Comparison of dust between Gale and Jezero. In Proceedings of the 53rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 7–11 March 2022. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2022/pdf/1758.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

166. Qin, X.; Ren, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wu, H.; Zeng, X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Modern water at low latitudes on Mars: Potential evidence from dune surfaces. *Sci. Adv.* **2023**, *9*, eadd8868. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

167. Head, J.W.; Mustard, J.F.; Kreslavsky, M.A.; Milliken, R.E.; Marchant, D.R. Recent ice ages on Mars. *Nature* **2003**, *426*, 797–802. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

168. Luo, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, W.; Shu, R. Alkali trace elements observed by MarSCoDe LIBS at Zhurong landing site on Mars: Quantitative analysis and its geological implications. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2024**, *129*, e2024JE008366. [CrossRef]

169. Morris, R.V.; Vaniman, D.T.; Blake, D.F.; Gellert, R.; Chipera, S.J.; Rampe, E.B.; Ming, D.W.; Morrison, S.M.; Downs, R.T.; Treiman, A.H.; et al. Silicic volcanism on Mars evidenced by tridymite in high-SiO₂ sedimentary rock at Gale crater. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2016**, *113*, 7071–7076. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

170. Czarnecki, S.; Hardgrove, C.; Gasda, P.; Calef, F.; Gengl, H.; Rapin, W.; Frydenvang, J.; Nowicki, S.; Thompson, L.; Wiens, R.C.; et al. Constraints on the hydration and distribution of high-silica layers in Gale crater using LIBS geochemistry and active neutron measurements. *JGR Planets* **2020**, *125*, e2019JE006180. [CrossRef]

171. Nellessen, M.A.; Newsom, H.E.; Scuderi, L.; Nachon, M.; Rivera-Hernandez, F.; Hughes, E.; Gasda, P.J.; Lanza, N.; Ollila, A.; Clegg, S.; et al. Identification of Ca-sulfate cemented bedrock and mixed vein-bedrock features using statistical analysis of ChemCam shot-to-shot data. In Proceedings of the 56th Lunar Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 10–14 March 2025. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/2358.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

172. Milliken, R.E.; Grotzinger, J.P.; Thomson, B.J. Paleoclimate of Mars as captured by the stratigraphic record of Gale crater. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2010**, *31*, L04201. [CrossRef]
173. Rivera-Hernandez, F.; Sumner, D.Y.; Mangold, N.; Stack, K.M.; Forni, O.; Newsom, H.; Williams, A.; Nachon, M.; L'Haridon, J.; Gasnault, O.; et al. Using ChemCam LIBS data to constrain grain size in rocks on Mars: Proof of concept and application to rocks at Yellowknife Bay and Pahrump Hills, Gale crater. *Icarus* **2019**, *321*, 82–98. [CrossRef]

174. Lasue, J.; Cousin, A.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Wiens, R.C.; Gasnault, O.; Rapin, W.; Schroeder, S.; Ollila, A.; Fabre, C.; Mangold, N.; et al. The MSL Science Team Martian eolian dust probed by ChemCam. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **2018**, *45*, 10968–10977. [CrossRef]

175. Cousin, A.; Meslin, P.-Y.; Forni, O.; Beyssac, O.; Clavé, E.; Hausrath, E.; Beck, P.; Bedford, C.; Sullivan, R.; Schröder, S.; et al. Soil diversity at Jezero crater and Comparison to Gale crater, Mars. *Icarus* **2025**, *425*, 116299. [CrossRef]

176. Edwards, P.H.; Bridges, J.C.; Wiens, R.C.; Anderson, R.; Dyar, M.D.; Fisk, M.; Thompson, L.; Gasda, P.; Filiberto, J.; Schwenzer, S.P.; et al. Basalt-trachybasalt samples from Gale crater, Mars. *Met. Planet. Sci.* **2017**, *52*, 2410–2931. [CrossRef]

177. McSween, H.Y.; Ruff, S.W.; Morris, R.V.; Bell, J.F., III; Herkenhoff, K.; Gellert, R.; Stockstill, K.R.; Tornabene, L.L.; Squyres, S.W.; Crisp, J.A.; et al. Alkaline volcanic rocks from the Columbia Hills, Gusev crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets* **2006**, *111*, E09S91. [CrossRef]

178. Bedford, C.C.; Bridges, J.C.; Schwenzer, S.P.; Wiens, R.C.; Rampe, E.; Frydenvang, J.; Gasda, P.J. Alteration trends and geochemical source region characteristics preserved in the fluviolacustrine sedimentary record of Gale crater, Mars. *Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta* **2019**, *246*, 234–266. [CrossRef]

179. Ollila, A.M.; Lanza, N.; Garczynski, B.; Theuer, S.; Schmidt, M.E.; Chide, B.; Bedford, C.; Gasda, P.; Forni, O.; Cousin, A.; et al. Rock Coatings In Jezero Crater As Observed By The Perseverance Rover. In Proceedings of the The Tenth International Conference on Mars, Pasadena, CA, USA, 22–25 July 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/tenthmars2024/pdf/3451.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

180. Garczynski, B.J.; Horgan, B.H.N.; Johnson, J.R.; Rice, M.S.; Mandon, L.; Chide, B.; Bechtold, A.; Beck, P.; Bell, J.F.; Dehouck, E.; et al. Rock coatings as evidence for late surface alteration on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars. *J. Geophys. Res. Planets*, 2025; accepted.

181. Dehouck, E.; Forni, O.; Quantin-Nataf, C.; Beck, P.; Mangold, N.; Beyssac, O.; Royer, C.; Clavé, E.; Johnson, J.R.; Mandon, L.; et al. The SuperCam Team Chemostratigraphy and Mineralogy of the Jezero Western Fan as Seen by the SuperCam Instrument: Evidence for a Complex Aqueous History and Variable Alteration Conditions. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Mars, Pasadena, CA, USA, 22–25 July 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/tenthmars2024/pdf/3364.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

182. Sridhar, R.V.L.N.; Goswami, A.; Lohar, K.A.; Raha, B.; Rao, M.V.H.; Gowda, G.; Smaran, T.S.; Kumar, A.S.; Bhuvaneswari, S.; Umesh, S.B.; et al. Close-range in-situ LIBS (laser induced breakdown spectroscope) experiment aboard the Chandrayaan-3 Pragyaan rover: Operations and initial results. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1135.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

183. Rapin, W.; Maurice, S.; Ollila, A.; Wiens, R.C.; Dubois, B.; Nelson, T.; Bonhomme, L.; Parot, Y.; Clegg, S.; Newell, R.; et al. µLIBS: Developing a Lightweight Elemental Micro-Mapper for In Situ Exploration. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 1–15 March 2024. Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/2670.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2025).

184. Pavlov, S.G.; Jessberger, E.K.; Huebers, H.-W.; Schroeder, S.; Rauschenbach, I.; Florek, S.; Neumann, J.; Henkel, H.; Klinkner, S. Miniaturized laser-induced plasma spectrometry for planetary in situ analysis—The case for Jupiter’s moon Europa. *Adv. Spa. Res.* **2011**, *48*, 764–778. [CrossRef]

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.