# Transgressive-regressive cycles in saline lake margin oolites: paleogeographic implications (Priabonian, Vistrenque basin, SE France)

Nazim Semmani, François Fournier, Philippe Léonide, Monique Feist, Sarah Boularand, Jean Borgomano

► To cite this version:

Nazim Semmani, François Fournier, Philippe Léonide, Monique Feist, Sarah Boularand, et al. "Transgressive-regressive cycles in saline lake margin oolites: paleogeographic implications (Priabonian, Vistrenque basin, SE France). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 2022, 193 (8), 10.1051/bsgf/2022012. hal-03949866"

HAL Id: hal-03949866

https://hal.science/hal-03949866

Submitted on 20 Jan 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
1 Transgressive-regressive cycles in saline lake margin oolites:

2 paleogeographic implications (Priabonian, Vistrenque basin, SE France)

3 Nazim Semmani¹, François Fournier¹,*, Philippe Léonide¹, Monique Feist², Sarah Boularand³,

4 Jean Borgomano¹

5 ¹: Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, IRD, Coll France, CEREGE, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Case 67,
6 13331, Marseille Cedex03, France.

7 ²: Université de Montpellier, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (ISEM), Campus Triolet,
8 CC065, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France

9 ³: Fédération de Recherche Sciences Chimiques Marseille FR 1739, Pôle PRATIM, 13331
10 Marseille Cedex 03, France.

11 *Corresponding author: fournier@cerege.fr

12

13 Abstract

14 The integrative analysis of a lacustrine carbonate succession from Butte Iouton hill (Vistrenque
15 basin, SE France) brings new insights into depositional models and stacking patterns of oolitic
16 saline lake margins and provides new details regarding the late Eocene paleogeography of
17 southeast France. Depositional facies analysis and paleoenvironmental reconstructions allow
18 reconstructing an oolitic lacustrine ramp model, displaying from the proximal to the distal areas:
19 1) shallow marginal saline lake domain with deposition of planar microbial laminites, and
20 molluscan-ostracodal wackestone, 2) a more distal and open lacustrine environments with low
21 to moderate energy characterized by the deposition of peloidal grainstones and 3) a domain of
22 higher energy with accumulation of ooids mixed with peloids in the vicinity of the area of ooid
23 production. Lake margin carbonate sedimentation dominantly occurred during stages of lake
24 transgression while subaerial exposure surfaces developed during periods of negative inflow-
25 evaporation balance (forced regression). Carbon and oxygen isotopes together with vertical
26 trends in salinity inferred from molluscan associations show that lake transgression does not
result from increasingly positive freshwater-evaporation balance volume but from the
combination of subsidence and outflow from neighbouring saline waterbodies. The Butte
Iouton carbonate margin is part of a set of interconnected saline lakes, occupying continental
basins from Languedoc and Rhodanian region during the Priabonian, with a siliciclastic-
dominated sedimentation in the southern margin, sourced by erosion of Pyrenean reliefs, and a
carbonate-dominated northern margin with significant oolitic sedimentation in high-energy
nearshore area.

Keywords: lacustrine carbonates, oolite, saline lakes, paleogeography, Eocene.

35

36 Résumé

37 Cycles de transgression-régression sur une marge oolithique de lac salin : implications
38 paléogéographiques (Priabonien, Bassin de la Vistrenque, Sud-Est de la France)

39 L'étude intégrée d'une butte-témoin de carbonates lacustres (Butte Iouton) a permis d'établir
40 un modèle de dépôt détaillé d'une marge carbonatée oolithique de lac salin, de mettre en
41 évidence des cycles de transgression-régression et d'apporter des éléments de reconstitution
42 paléogéographique des bassins lacustres priaboniens du sud-est de la France. Un modèle de
43 rampe carbonatée lacustre a été mis en évidence, présentant du pôle proximal au pôle distal : 1)
44 un domaine interne à laminites microbiennes et wackestones à ostracodes et mollusques, 2) un
45 domaine plus ouvert, d'énergie modérée à sédimentation granulaire péloïdale et 3) un
46 environnement externe de plus haute énergie à accumulation d'ooïdes et de péloïdes. La
47 sédimentation carbonatée de bordure de lac se produit principalement pendant des phases de
48 transgression lacustre contrôlées par la subsidence alors que les surfaces d'émersion marquent
49 des périodes de bilan hydrique déficitaire et d'assèchement du lac (régression forcée). Les
50 signatures isotopiques (carbone et oxygène) des carbonates ainsi que les tendances d'évolution
51 verticale de la salinité estimées par les assemblages de mollusques suggèrent que les
transgressions lacustres ne sont pas associées à un bilan hydrologique excédentaire, mais à des
connexions avec des masses d'eau salées adjacentes dans un contexte subsident. Les sédiments
carbonatés de la Butte Iouton se sont déposés sur les marges d'un système de lacs salins
interconnectés de grande dimension, occupant différents sous-bassins du Languedoc et de la
Vallée du Rhône. La marge sud de ce système lacustre était à sédimentation silicoclastique
dominante, alimentée par l'érosion des reliefs pyrénéens, alors que la marge nord était
carbonatée avec un développement significatif de corps oolithiques.

59

60 Mots-clés: carbonates lacustres, oolithe, lacs salins, paleogéographie, Eocène.

61

62 **1. Introduction**

The European Cenozoic Rift System (ECRIS) (Ziegler, 1992; Dèzes et al., 2004) is a NE-SW system of continental lake basins formed during the upper Eocene in the Alpine foreland. These basins are characterized by thick siliciclastic, carbonate and evaporite deposits (e.g. Rouchy, 1997). In southeast France, the onset of saline lakes occurred as early as the early Priabonian in the Saint-Chaptes basin (Lettéron et al., 2018) and then developed on a larger scale during the middle to late Priabonian in the Alès (Lettéron et al., 2018), Issirac (Lettéron et al., 2017), Mormoiron-Carpentras (Triat and Truc, 1974; Truc, 1978), Manosque-Forcalquier (Lesueur, 1991) basins and further north in the Valence graben (Dromart and Dumas, 1997) (Fig. 1A). Despite detailed studies on individual basins or connected lake systems (e.g. ASCI lake system: Lettéron et al., 2022; Apt-Manosque-Forcalquier lake system: Lesueur, 1991), there are still unresolved questions, debates and controversies on the paleogeography of western Europe during the late Eocene – lower Oligocene times, the origin of the salinity in the lakes and the connections between the lakes and the oceanic realm (e.g. Fontes et al., 1991; Rouchy, 1997;
76 Briot and Poidevin, 1998; Bodergat et al., 1999; Rouchy and Blanc-Valleron, 2009; Lettéron et al., 2017; 2018). For instance, Lettéron et al. (2017, 2018) found that the ASCI lacustrine system was connected to neighbouring saline water bodies whose location and source are not formally established. According to these authors, saline water feeding is presumably from the leaching of northern Triassic diapirs via Mormoiron-Carpentras throughs and/or marine domain through the Vistrenque area. The latter is poorly documented since the Paleogene deposits are almost entirely buried beneath the Rhône delta sediments.

83 Another major issue for the reconstruction of paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of Paleogene basins from southeast France is the availability and quality of chronostratigraphic constraints (Séranne et al., 2021). East of the Nîmes fault, the Cenozoic Vistrenque graben is known only through subsurface studies and has been assigned to the Oligocene Gulf of Lion margin (Valette and Benedicto, 1995; Benedicto et al., 1996), while Cavelier (1984) suggested that the Vistrenque graben initiated during the Priabonian coevally with the neighbouring Languedoc basins such as the north-Montpellier, Sommières, Saint-Chaptes, Ales and Issirac basins (Séranne et al., 2021; Lettéron et al., 2022). To date, the paucity of chronostratigraphic data from the basal filling of the graben (Série grise siliciclastic unit, e.g. Valette and Benedicto, 1995) does not allow this hypothesis to be validated. However, the northern part of the basin offers the possibility to study on outcrops carbonate successions assumed to be upper Eocene in age (Roman, 1910) and thus provides clues to address the question.

95 In the present work, we carry out a detailed petrographic, sedimentological and geochemical analysis of a carbonate succession which outcrops on a residual hill (Butte Iouton, Beaucaire) located east of the Nîmes fault on the northern margin of the Vistrenque graben and that is characterized by the dominance of oolitic deposits (Fig. 1A, 3A). The main objectives of this study are 1) to document the existence of a salt lake carbonate sedimentation during the Priabonian in the north of the Vistrenque basin and provide new constraints to the
101

chonostratigraphic framework 2) to reconstruct the depositional environments for a Cenozoic
oolitic saline lake margin 3) to discuss the control of tectonics and paleohydrological changes
onto the vertical facies stacking pattern and depositional sequence development and 4) to
provide new insights into the paleogeography of the southeast France by investigating the
possible relationships between the saline lake basins of the ECRIS.

102

103

104

105

106

## 2. Geological setting

107

### 2.1. The Vistrenque Cenozoic basin: regional tectonic setting and stratigraphy

108

109

110

111

112

The Vistrenque basin is a NE-SW trending Cenozoic basin located in the western part of the Camargue region (SE France). The basin extends over 50*30 Km² and is assumed to be the deepest Cenozoic basin in the SE of France (Benedicto et al., 1996), it is linked to the Northeast with the Pujaut trough and is separated from the neighbouring Vaccarès (Petit-Rhône) basin by the Albaron structural high (Fig. 1A).

113

114

115

116

The Nîmes fault is a major low angle-ramp that bounds the Vistrenque and Pujaut basins to the NW and was active during the Oligo-Aquitanian rifting of the Gulf of Lion margin that preceded the oceanic accretion in the Liguro-Provençal basin during the Burdigalian (Gorini et al., 1993; Séranne et al., 1995; Valette and Benedicto, 1995; Benedicto et al., 1996).

117

118

119

120

Prior to the Oligo-Miocene rifting, strike-slip deformation regime led to the development of many continental sedimentary basins (e.g. Alès-Saint-Chaptes-Issirac basin, Lettéron et al., 2022) during the Priabonian (late Eocene) in Languedoc area within a NE trending sinistral strike-slip shear zone, located between the Cévennes and Nîmes faults (Séranne et al., 2021).

121

122

123

124

The Eocene and Oligocene basins of the Languedoc area have well constrained
chonostratigraphic frameworks and their depositional and structural settings are well
documented (Benedicto et al., 1996; Séranne et al., 2021; Lettéron et al., 2022). The Nîmes and
Cévennes sinistral strike-slip faults have accommodated simultaneously the E-W extension of
the Western European rifting in the north and the Pyrenean compression from the south (Séranne et al., 2021). In the Camargue region located southern to the Languedoc, Eocene deposits are only known from the Jonquières high (Fig. 1A), and no evidence can be provided to confirm the presence of upper Eocene deposits in the Camargue basins (e.g. Vistrenque basin) since their chronostratigraphic framework is not constrained (Benedicto et al., 1996).

Stratigraphically, the Eocene (?) to Aquitanian sedimentary succession of the Vistrenque basin exceeds 3000 m in thickness and is subdivided in the depocentre of the basin into three main units, from bottom to top: *Série grise* (more than 2000 m thick), *Série Rouge* (~ 200 m) and *Série Calcaréo-salifère* (900 m) formations (Benedicto, et al., 1996). The lowermost *Série grise* unit consists mainly of deep-lake non-fossiliferous mixed siliciclastic-carbonate detrital sediments and their attribution to the beginning of the Oligo-Miocene gulf of Lion rifting (Benedicto, 1996) or to the late Eocene development of continental basins is an open question.

The upper *Série Calcaréo-Salifère* unit is made essentially of evaporite deposits that were assigned to the Upper Oligocene (Valette, 1991). According to Cavelier (1984), the similarity of the sedimentation pattern between the Languedoc grabens and Vistrenque basin (i.e. dominant siliciclastic sedimentation to south and carbonate lacustrine margin to the north) would suggest that the deposition of the lowermost *Série grise* unit or at least the basal intervals of this unit was coeval with the widespread Priabonian continental sedimentation in the Issirac, Alès, Saint-Chaptes and Sommières basins.

## 2.2. The Jonquières high: stratigraphy of the Priabonian lacustrine margin

The Jonquières high is about 5-6 km wide and represents a NE-SW horst structure bordering the Vistrenque basin to the north and located southeast to the Pujaut through and northwest to the Tarascon trough (Fig. 1A). The high is constituted essentially of the Lower Cretaceous substratum; the Eocene to Miocene cover is limited to a few small residual hills between the villages of Comps and Beaucaire (Fig. 1B). Resting on the Hauterivian marine limestones and
marly limestones, the Eocene deposits from these hills (e.g. butte Iouton) consist essentially of a ~30 m thick lacustrine limestone succession resting on variegated clays and silts (about 20 m thick interval) attributed by Pellat and Allard (1895) to the early Eocene on the basis of regional facies analogy without any paleontological evidence. These Eocene lacustrine limestones are unconformably overlain by Burdigalian (early Miocene) transgressive coralline algal marine limestones (Pellat and Allard, 1895; Roman, 1903) (Fig. 1C).

The lacustrine limestones from Butte Iouton include oolithic intervals that have been exploited since the Middle Ages as a statuary stone (Dumas, 1876). They yielded a rich molluscan fauna that has attracted the attention of geologists since the first half of the 19th century (de Roys, 1846). The first detailed section of the Butte Iouton hill was carried out by Pellat and Allard (1895) who identified 9 main fossiliferous carbonate layers and mentioned a preliminary list of fossil molluscs. Roman (1910) took charge of the detailed study of fossil molluscs from the regional "Sannoisian" formations and has drawn up a comprehensive inventory that consists of 30 taxa including eight holotypes (hosted in the collections of the University of Lyon) of gastropod species.

## 3. Material and methods

The 50m-thick Cenozoic succession of the Butte Iouton hill has been mapped (Fig. 1B). Most of the carbonate section is quarried on the western flank of the hill (see location in Fig. 1C) thus enabling a continuous and detailed observation of the rock succession. Data on sedimentary structures, depositional textures, biological content, and diagenetic features are compiled in the detailed sedimentary log (Fig. 2).

### *Depositional facies and petrographic characterization*

A total of 28 thin sections have been prepared to perform detailed microfacies characterization and to determine the petrographic features of the grains using a conventional transmitted
polarized light microscope. Carbonate depositional facies have been defined on both macroscopic descriptions and microscopic observations using the Dunham classification of carbonates (Dunham, 1962) expanded by Embry and Klovan (1971). Point-counting (300 points) performed with the JMicroVision software allows to quantify the allochem proportions in thin sections (Roduit, 2007). SEM observations conducted at Pôle PRATIM (Plateforme de Recherche Analytique Technologique et Imagerie, Aix-Marseille University, FSCM) using a Philips XL30 ESEM (environmental scanning electron microscope) enable to investigate in more detail the internal microstructure of some carbonate grains.

## Biological assemblages and chronostratigraphic framework

Particular attention was paid to the examination of the quarry's fossiliferous layers to determine the fossil assemblages, namely the molluscs (gastropods and bivalves) and the remains of characean algae (Fig. 3). Molluscan assemblages provide key indication for paleoecological reconstructions (e.g. Lettéron et al., 2017) and contribute to a lesser extent to constrain the chronostratigraphic framework (Cavelier, 1984). Charophyte gyrogonites constitute an essential tool to better constrain the age of the deposition of fresh and brackish water carbonates and will therefore be used for the biostratigraphic review of the studied succession from the butte Iouton hill. Molluscan shells and charophyte gyrogonites are often well preserved and are easily extracted. In few horizons, the shells are totally dissolved and only the external moulds remain. Casts have been made by injecting silicone resin into the moulds and the resulting casts allow a detailed examination of the external ornamentation of the molluscan shell casts. The identification of the molluscan taxa is carried out in accordance with the diagnoses documented in Fontannes (1884) and in Roman (1910). The fossil collection of Pierre de Brun, hosted in the Museum of Paleontology of the Aix-Marseille University, that catalogues most of the molluscs found in the butte Iouton have been also consulted.
198

The chronostratigraphic framework of the butte Iouton limestones has been therefore established using: (1) characean gyrogonites and (2) key molluscan taxa with significant stratigraphic value.

199

200

201

Carbon and oxygen stable isotopes

202

A total of 58 powdered samples (average spacing = 50 cm) were extracted from the limestones using a Dremel micro-drill tool. Bulk-rock stable carbon and oxygen isotope analyses were performed at the GeoZentrum Nordbayern department, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Germany) in order to detect potential diagenetic overprints (e.g. pedogenesis at exposure surfaces) and/or to provide insights into lake paleohydrology. The analysis technique employed consists in the reaction of the powders with 100% phosphoric acid at 70°C using a Gasbench II connected to a Thermo Fisher Scientific DELTA V Plus mass spectrometer. All values are reported in per mil relative to V-PDB. Reproducibility and accuracy were monitored by replicate analysis of laboratory standards calibrated by assigning $\delta^{13}\text{C}$ values of +1.95‰ to NBS19 and -47.3‰ to IAEA-CO9 and $\delta^{18}\text{O}$ values of -2.20‰ to NBS19 and -23.2‰ to NBS18. Reproducibility for $\delta^{13}\text{C}$ and $\delta^{18}\text{O}$ was ±0.04 and ±0.03 (1 standard deviation), respectively.

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

# 4. Results and interpretations

215

## 4.1. Biostratigraphy

216

The Butte Iouton quarry yields two taxa from the genus *Gyrogona* and some specimens are catalogued in the collections of the University of Montpellier under the number CF.3088.

217

218

a. *Gyrogona caelata* Ried and Groves, 1921 (Fig. 4A)

219

This species is largely dominant in the charophyte assemblage. The general morphology as well as the dimensions of the examined samples are consistent with the definition given by Grambast

220
221

and Grambast-Fessard (1981). *G. caelata* is widespread in the European area and occurs within
the charophytes biozones ranging from *Maedleriella embergeri* zone to *Stephanochara
vectensis* zone (Riveline et al., 1996). These biozones encompass the upper Lutetian –
Priabonian interval.

222

223

224

225

b. *Gyrogona* aff. *lemani capitata* Grambast and Grambast-Fressard, 1981 (Fig. 4B)

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

This species is uncommon in the butte Iouton deposit and only a couple of specimens have been identified. The specimens meet the morphological criteria given by Grambast and Grambast-Fessard (1981) although their dimensions are found to be slightly smaller. This taxon is reported from many areas in Western Europe, such as the Paris Basin, Campbon Basin (southern Brittany), Upper Rhine Basin (Bouxwiller site) and southwestern Languedoc (Causse-et-Veyran site) (Riveline, 1986). *G. lemani capitata* appears, together with the whole species of the genus *Gyrogona*, within the *Maedleriella embergeri* biozone and has a lesser range than *G. caelata* (Riveline et al., 1996). The former extends only up to the *Psilochara repanda* biozone, thus suggesting an age ranging from the Lutetian to the upper Bartonian. The difference in dimensions with the holotype raises uncertainties about the taxonomic attribution of the two specimens to *G. lemani capitata*, hence the insertion of the complement aff. (*species affinis*). The insufficient amount of material makes it difficult any attempt to define a new species. Because of such a taxonomic uncertainty, these two specimens were not considered for constraining biostratigraphic ages.

240

241

242

243

244

245

The molluscan taxa identified on the butte Iouton outcrops are illustrated in Figure 4 and fall
within the list of taxa compiled by Roman (1910) (Fig. 4C-K). Out of a total of the 30 molluscan
taxa described by the same author in this site, 15 species are also documented from the
molluscan associations of the middle to upper Priabonian successions from the Alès and Issirac
basins (Fontannes, 1884; Lettéron et al., 2017). Among the mollusc taxa of the butte Iouton,
some fossils are considered to have a reliable regional stratigraphic value and are therefore used
246 as key-stratigraphic markers in continental settings (Cavelier et al., 1984; Fauré, 2007). For
247 instance, *Nystia plicata* (d'Archiac & Verneuil, 1855) extends from the late Priabonian to the
248 Rupelian while *Viviparus soricinensis* (Noulet) has a much wider range since it is known from
249 middle Priabonian up to Rupelian deposits. However, the bivalve *Polymesoda dumasi* (M. de
250 Serres, 1827) has a narrow range since it occurs only from the middle to upper Priabonian and
251 has never been reported in the Oligocene successions. Along with the previously discussed
252 stratigraphic implications of the charophyte flora, the molluscan assemblage especially the
253 occurrence of the taxa *N. plicata* and *P. dumasi* provides strong evidence to assign a late
254 Priabonian age to the Butte Iouton limestones.
255

## 4.2. Carbonate petrography and diagenetic features

256 Petrography and SEM observations of thin sections from the butte Iouton limestones help to
257 identify five grain types, namely ooids, peloids, aggregate grains, reworked sparitic crusts and
258 miscellaneous skeletal grains including molluscans (both bivalves and gastropods) and
259 ostracods, and charophyte remains.
260

260 Ooids are the dominant grain type and are generally small, averaging 300 microns in diameter
261 (medium sand) (Fig. 5A, 6A-B). These small ooids display various cortex fabrics: thin cortices
262 are found in superficial ooids while radial fibrous or concentric micritic cortices define radiaxial
263 (Fig. 5A-B) and micritized ooids (Fig. 5C-D) respectively. The ooids have either peloid,
264 bioclast or fine quartz grain nuclei and show different stages of micritization obliterating the
265 original microstructure. Other coated grains include coarse ooids and/or oncoids (=coated
266 grains whose cortex is formed by cyanobacterial laminae) (Fig. 6G), their sizes range between
267 600 microns and may reach up to 2 mm and most of them display concentric laminae cortices.
268

268 Peloids are frequent in the butte Iouton limestones and show various shapes and sizes (Fig. 5A-
269 6E-F). Peloids are in general sub-rounded to elongated, range between 80 and 200 microns in
270

size and display dark and homogeneous micritic internal structure. Aggregate grains from the
butte Iouton section are very irregular in shape and are recognized based on the characteristic
lobate to rounded outlines (Fig. 6E). These aggregate grains have a wide range of sizes from
0.5 mm to several mm and the original separate grains may either be peloids or micritized ooids;
their smooth outlines allow to consider them as lumps according to the description provided by
Tucker and Wright (1990). Reworked sparitic crusts are flattened and are thin sheets formed by
calcite crystals arranged side by side. The sparry crystals are equigranular, dogteeth shaped,
and each is between 40 and 50 µm in size (Fig. 7F). Calcite crystals line up in one or more rows
and this may reflect single or multiple generations of crystal growth from an initial surface,
possibly a microbial film and have been reworked and re-deposited without any particular
orientation.

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

The molluscs from the butte Iouton limestones consist mainly of freshwater to oligo-mesohaline
taxa. Gastropods and bivalves may be found in the form of entirely micritized calcitic shells
(Fig. 6E-F) or recognized by their external moulds if they are completely dissolved, especially
in case of formerly aragonitic shells (Fig. 7A, 7D, 7G-H). Ostracods (Fig. 7G) and characean
gyrogonites (Fig. 8C) are preserved owing to their original calcite mineralogy.

282

283

284

285

286

The main diagenetic processes observed are: a) compaction (ooids, shells, characean remains),
b) micritization of molluscan shells and ooid cortices, c) selective mouldic dissolution of
aragonite grains (mainly molluscs), d) cementation (calcite spar: Fig. 8E), e) pedogenesis (soil
formation, brecciation), and f) calcite pseudomorphs after gypsum (Fig. 8E).

287

288

289

290

Petrographic observations show preferential dissolution of the aragonite shells of molluscs and
the preservation of the ooids cortices that may point to different original mineralogies of these
grains, while some samples display strong micritization of both molluscan shells and ooids. The
original mineralogy of the ooids is difficult to establish since both radiaxial and micritized
layers can coexist and since petrographic observations show evidences of severe neomorphic

291

292

293

294
295

processes. The mineralogy of ooids and their fabric, in particular those formed in freshwater
and extreme environments is still a matter of debate (e.g. Kahle, 1974; Sandberg, 1975, 1980;
Swirydczuk and Wilkinson, 1979).

296

297

298

**4.3. Depositional facies and paleoenvironmental interpretations**

299

300

301

Based on depositional texture (Dunham classification), sedimentary structures, biotic
composition, and the petrographic character of the allochems, nine depositional facies have
been defined and summarized in Table 1.

302

**F1A. Oolitic-peloidal grainstone**

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

This facies consists of moderately to well-sorted grainstones composed of a mixture of ooids
and peloids in variable proportions: ooids (~ 300 microns in size) are dominant and their
proportion ranges from 50% (bimodal distribution) to 95% (unimodal distribution) (Fig. 6A-
B). Some ooids exhibit preserved superficial and radiaxial internal structures although most of
them are strongly micritized. The peloids are predominantly small and have different
morphologies, their dimensions range between 100 and 200 microns; other allochems include
few aggregate grains (<1%). Molluscan shells and fragments can accumulate in the form of
fossiliferous gravelly lenses interbedded with the ooidal-peloidal sand levels (Fig. 6C). The
gravelly lenses are about 10 cm thick and few metres wide, and most of the fossils are complete
or slightly broken. The molluscan assemblage is dominated by *Melanopsis*, *Tarebia* and
*Neritina*. Together with the peloidal grainstones (see description hereinafter), the oolitic-peloidal
grainstones form subhorizontal beds with thicknesses varying from 2 m to 3 m (Fig. 3B-6C).
Cross-stratifications are seldom visible on outcrop and when observed (e.g. Fig. 6D) they may
form 10-50 cm height sets that are bounded at base and top by planar nearly horizontal surfaces
("planar cross-stratifications"). The scarce apparent paleocurrent directions measured on the
quarry faces are toward the south-west.
**Interpretation:** The moderately to good sorting of these grainstones and the winnowing of the micrite suggest high energy depositional conditions. Though seldom observable, the occurrence of planar cross-stratifications within the oolitic beds may reflect sandwaves or dunes migration related to high energy currents (Dalrymple, 1992). Ooids are generally produced in shallow nearshore shoals subject to high hydrodynamic conditions and form very well sorted sediments.

Thus, the mixture of ooids and peloids in F1A facies suggests deposition in the vicinity of these shoals where ooids are remobilized by waves and currents. In lacustrine environments, well sorted oolitic sediments are essentially reported from shallow lake margin shoreface (e.g. Williamson and Picard, 1974; Tänavsuu-Milkeviciene et al., 2017; Gallois et al., 2018; Deschamps et al., 2020) and foreshore settings (Swirydczuk et al., 1980; Milroy and Wright, 2002). The relative scarcity of sedimentary structures in most oolitic beds may result from significant burrowing of a stable substrate in a low to moderate energy environment in backshoal setting as reported from shallow marine environments (Pomar et al., 2015). The molluscan-rich gravelly lenses are also indicative of moderate to high energy at least intermittently to make fossil accumulations possible. Gastropod *Tarebia* is known to thrive preferentially in oligo-mesohaline waters (e.g. Plaziat and Younis, 2005; Esu and Girotti, 2010; Miranda et al., 2010) while *Melanopsis* is mostly indicative of freshwater to oligohaline settings (Velasco et al., 2006). Plaziat and Younis (2005) found that smooth morphologies of *Melanopsis*, such as evidenced in Butte Iouton specimens, prefer brackish-water environments.

The oolitic-peloidal grainstones and gravelly lenses are therefore interpreted to form within and/or at the vicinity of shallow nearshore oolitic shoals, in low to moderate salinity (from oligo- to mesohaline) and moderate to intermittently high energy waters.

## F1B: Peloidal grainstone with scattered molluscs

F1B facies consists of a moderately to well-sorted grainstones composed mainly of peloids with proportions ranging between 75% and 90% and molluscan shells (<20%) with few aggregate
344

grains and ooids (Fig. 6E). The peloids occur in a wide range of morphologies and are between
0.05 and 0.2 mm in size. The aggregate grains (Fig. 6E) are large with dimensions comprised
between 0.5 mm and few millimetres and are often lumps formed by peloids and few micritized
ooids bound together by microbial cement. Gastropods are the dominant organisms found in
these facies and their association is similar to that described previously from the oolitic-peloidal
grainstones, among others *Melanopsis* and *Tarebia*: the shells are found to be entirely
micritized. Together with the previously described oolitic-peloidal sands (F1A) and the gravelly
fossiliferous lenses, these peloidal grainstones are organized into massive (2-3 m thick) and
subhorizontal, structureless beds.

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

**Interpretation:** Like in the F1A facies, the lack of mud matrix and the good sorting of the grains suggest that F1B facies are deposited in moderate to high energy settings. In addition, the occurrence of F1B facies together with F1A facies and the presence of minor proportion of ooids in the peloidal sands strongly indicate nearby depositional environments. The good sorting and the low variation in shape of peloids suggest they are likely to be mostly produced by organisms (i.e., faecal pellets) like gastropods and ostracods. Molluscan-rich accumulations probably result from transportation and deposition of molluscan shells during higher energy episodes. Similarly to F1A, the molluscan assemblage indicates oligo-mesohaline shallow waters probably of less than 10 m in depth (e.g. Lettéron et al., 2017 and references therein). Furthermore, the absence of subaerial exposure features within these facies indicates perennial lake conditions. Consequently, F1B facies is interpreted to form in the shallow parts of a perennial lake close to the oolitic shoals with moderate to high energy levels.

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

365

## F1C: Oncoidal-ooidal rich peloidal grainstone

366

F1C facies is a peloidal grainstone comprising large proportions of oncoids and coarse ooids, and molluscan shells (Fig. 6F-G). This facies has been only encountered within centimetre to few centimetres thick lenses, interbedded within F1B peloidal grainstones at the top of U2 and in

367

368
369 U4 cycle. Peloids are predominant (50%) and the coated grains (20-40%) consist either of
370 coarse ooids (~ 600-900 microns) or oncoids (up to 2 mm in size), their grain distribution
371 exhibits floating coarse grains in a peloidal matrix. The molluscan shells are less frequent and
372 are strongly micritized.

373 **Interpretation:** The scarcity of mud matrix in these grainstones indicates at least intermittent
374 water turbulence allowing the winnowing of fines. In addition, the poor sorting and the presence
375 of coarse coated grains reflect sporadic high energy events such as fluvial floods. The peloids
376 from F1C facies resemble those of F1B facies in which they are intercalated, and therefore may
377 form in the same perennial shallow lake settings with moderate to high water energy. Oncoid-
378 rich grainstones have been found to form as a result of fluvial overbank in lacustrine and
379 floodplain environments (Schäfer and Stapf, 1978; Arenas et al., 2007; Lettéron et al., 2018),
380 but are also common along the shoreline of various modern and ancient lakes (e.g. Plio-
381 Pleistocene from Lake Turkana: Hargrave et al., 2014; Nutz et al., 2020; Lake Geneva: Davaud
382 and Girardclos, 2001). Therefore, the F1C facies is interpreted to form in a shallow nearshore
383 environment of a perennial lake, similar to that of F1B depositional environments, the oncoids
384 perhaps deriving from the shoreline or from a nearby mouth of an oncoid-producing river.

386 F2A: Molluscan-rich peloidal packstone-grainstone

387 This facies consists of limestones containing large amounts of small peloids mixed with
388 frequent molluscs, few ostracods and scarce small ooids set in micrite to microspar matrix (Fig.
389 7A-7D). The peloids are densely packed, irregular in shape and are very small (80-200 microns
390 in size). The molluscan shells are dissolved, and the organisms are identified only from their
391 external moulds, the biological association comprises mainly *Polymesoda, Hydrobia and*
392

*Tarebia* (Fig. 7B). These peloidal-dominated packstones are found in the form of decimetre thick beds and are devoid of sedimentary structures (Fig. 7C).

393

394

**Interpretation:** The occurrence but relative scarcity of micrite matrix suggests relatively calm environments but with transient periods of higher energy. The abundance of peloids in the matrix and their regular shape and comparable size (50-100 µm) may be interpreted as faecal pellets and likely results from the presence of abundant molluscan and crustacean communities.

The molluscan assemblage dominated by *Polymesoda* and *Hydrobia* and *Tarebia* is indicative of warm, shallow and oligo-mesohaline waters (Daley, 1972; Morton, 1983, Fretter and Graham, 1978, Lettéron et al., 2017). Extant *Polymesoda* bivalves are found in a variety of variable salinity shallow environments (Reichenbacher et al. 2004; Harris et al., 2015) and their optimal depth is lower than 1 m (Tabb and Moore, 1971) even though these may be found at depths of 10 m (Morton, 1983; Lettéron et al., 2017). *Polymesoda* are found both valves connected thus indicating deposition in their living environment. Extant *Hydrobia acuta* *neglecta* are found in coastal lagoons where salinity ranges between 10 and 24‰ (Fretter and Graham, 1978). Thus, the biological community of F2A facies, particularly through the presence of *Hydrobia*, exhibits the greatest tolerance to salinity elevation compared to the freshwater to oligo-mesohaline gastropods and charophytes found in the overlying and underlying levels (F2B and F2D facies, see descriptive sections hereinfater). The lack of subaerial exposure features indicates deposition in perennial waters. The facies F2A is therefore interpreted to form in shallow, warm, and brackish lake with low to moderate water energy.

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

## F2B: Characean-rich peloidal wackestone to packstone

413

This facies consists of a mixture of densely packed peloids of very small size (50 - 100 microns) with frequent characean cortical cells, stems and gyrogonites, and numerous ostracods, occasional molluscs and few ooids (Fig. 7C-7E). The charophytes remains are preserved and are slightly compacted. Molluscan shells are either entirely leached or completely micritized

414

415

416
417

and their association is dominated by *Polymesoda*, *Tarebia* and hydrobids. F2B facies occurs
in several centimetres to decimetre thick tabular to nearly horizontal beds and form together
with F2A peloidal packstones an approximately 4 m high package of platelets limestones (Fig.
7C).

418

419

420

421

**Interpretation:** The mud-supported texture results from the trapping of micrite and peloids and indicates low water energy which limits the winnowing of fine particles. The abundance of characean remains reflects the development of macrophyte meadows in shallow lake margin environments which act like a natural barrier against hydrodynamic energy. Charophytes colonize lacustrine substrates and may cover large areas but are limited by light penetration and their maximum depth does not exceed 12 m (Garcia, 1994; Garcia and Chivas, 2006) thus supporting the shallow water column during the deposition of the F2B facies. Charophytes thrive in freshwater lakes, but some taxa tolerate brackish waters and withstand changes in salinity (Garcia, 1994; Van Den Berg et al., 1998, Lettéron et al., 2017). In addition, the molluscan assemblages found in these wackestones indicate warm, shallow and fresh to oligo-mesohaline waters. Finally, the F2B facies reflects deposition within calcifying and non-calcifying charophyte meadows in shallow, freshwater to oligo-mesohaline lake settings.

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

## F2C: Peloidal wackestone to packstone with calcitic rafts

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

This facies occurs in decimetre tabular beds formed by densely packed peloids similar to those
from facies F2A and F2B and comprises various proportions of crystalline flakes (calcitic rafts),
few ostracods and scarce small gastropods and ooids (Fig. 7F). The peloids are very small (120-
200 microns in size) and may be of faecal origin. Calcite rafts, described early as reworked
sparitic crusts, are fragmented into pieces of various size (0.1 to 5 mm) or even as individual
spar crystal. Gastropod shells are entirely leached. Faunal content is poor and molluscan
assemblage is dominated by *Polymesoda* and *Tarebia*. These facies are found close to the F2A
and F2B tabular beds and arranged together within the platelets limestones package.
442

**Interpretation:** The abundance of mud matrix in these facies suggests deposition in low-energy areas. However, the breakage of the calcite rafts and the abundance of peloids indicate intermittent hydrodynamic conditions. Features resembling those crystalline flakes are documented in the literature and many hypotheses have been considered to explain their origin.

443

444

445

446

Many authors described these structures in various depositional settings and referred to them as calcite rafts, paper thin rafts and floating mats (see review in Lettéron et al., 2018 and references therein). The abundance of peloids may indicate abundant gastropods and crustacean communities. The presence of small gastropods is indicative of shallow lake conditions probably of less than 10 m while the molluscan assemblage is indicative of brackish water environments. The close occurrence of this facies with F2A and F2B facies indicate nearby depositional settings. Therefore, the peloidal wackestones to packstones with calcite rafts facies reflect deposition in calm waters, supersaturated for CaCO3 precipitation at the water-air interface (calcite rafts), with intermittent moderate water energy in the shallow sheltered areas of the lake in the vicinity of non-calcifying macrophyte meadows.

447

448

449

450

451

452

453

454

455

456

## F2D: Molluscan-rich ostracod wackestone

457

This facies consists of limestones that contain sparse to loosely packed allochems including numerous ostracods and mollusc shells as well as few ooids and peloids (Fig. 7G-H). These wackestones occur in beds of several centimetres to few tens of centimetres (Fig. 8A). Ostracods are small (around 0.5 mm) and thin-shelled and their valves may be found either articulated or disarticulated. Gastropods are often leached but their complete external moulds allow easy identification (Fig. 7G). The molluscan assemblage is widely diversified, and the community comprises essentially terrestrial and freshwater to oligo-mesohaline water taxa, among them *Lymnea* (Galba), *Planorbis*, *Tarebia*, *Viviparus* and *Polymesoda*.

458

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

**Interpretation:** The molluscan-rich ostracod wackestones are formed in low energy environments as suggested by the high micrite content of the facies. The matrix of these

466
wackestones consists of inhomogeneous micrite and this likely results from ostracod burrowing and bioturbation. Burrowing and bioturbation indicate intense biological activity in very well oxygenated conditions. In addition, the molluscan assemblage, reflecting various ranges of salinity mostly freshwater for *Lymnea*, *Planorbis* and *Viviparus* and oligo-mesohaline for *Polymesoda*, indicates shallow and variable salinity settings, potentially marginal pools close to emerged wetlands or a saline lake margin at the vicinity of freshwater springs. Charophyte remains are not found thus excluding the development of calcifying meadows although non calcifying subaqueous prairies could have developed. The presence of significant amount of small ooids in F2D wackestones indicates the vicinity of oolitic bodies from which the ooids are sporadically exported into the sheltered areas. Moreover, these molluscan-rich ostracod wakestones are sharply overlain by high energy oolitic deposits (F1A) and this suggests lateral migration of the oolitic sand bodies. Finally, F2D facies is interpreted to form in low energy and shallow freshwater to brackish pools and sheltered areas of the lake margin.

### F3: Planar-laminated bindstones (microbial laminites)

Microbial laminites are made of an alternation of subhorizontal to wavy and crinkled dark clotted and peloidal micrite laminae (100 microns to 1 mm thick) and light thin laminae (0.5 to 1 mm) constituted of the accumulation of crushed charophyte stems and cortical cells with fine calcite spar cement (Fig. 8B-C). This facies exhibits a bindstone fabric (sensu Embry and Klovan, 1971) and is formed by micrite stabilization and binding of various skeletal grains including gastropod and ostracod shells as well as characean gyrogonites (Fig. 8B-C). The molluscan assemblage is dominated by the gastropod *Melanopsis acrolepta* the shells of which are entirely dissolved (Fig. 8B). The laminated bindstones show very little fenestral porosity and the presence of small-scale undulations and corrugations in the laminae may point to a microbial origin of the micrite. This facies occurs in centimetre tight beds and may form up to metre intervals of laminated limestones (Fig. 8A).
**Interpretation:** Planar laminated stromatolites from Tertiary basins of SE France are interpreted to form in very shallow water lacustrine environments that may experience occasional short-term emersions (e.g. Wattine et al., 2003; Lettéron et al., 2017). The shallow-water conditions prevailing for the deposition of facies F3 are supported by the abundance of characean gyrogonites and stems, and by the bathymetric range of the bound molluscs (*Melanopsis*). The presence of charophyte gyrogonites indicates colonization of the lake substrate by charophyte algae in the nearby areas and suggests freshwater to slightly brackish water conditions. While stromatolites are euryhaline and tolerate a wide range of salinities (e.g. Talbot and Allen, 1996), the biological content points to freshwater to oligohaline conditions. Extant *Melanopsis* are found to live in coastal streams and freshwater to oligohaline lake waters under Mediterranean and semi-arid climates (Plaziat and Younis, 2005; Velasco et al., 2006; Van Damme, 2014). In the Priabonian lacustrine deposits from the Issirac basin (SE France), planar stromatolites are interpreted to form in the shallowest parts of the lake margin while the charophytes are considered to thrive at depths comprised between 0.5 m and 10 m (Lettéron et al., 2017). However, it has been documented that the development of either photosynthetic (e.g. charophytes) or microbial communities is presumably driven by changes in trophic conditions regardless of the depositional depth (Lettéron, 2018). The microbial communities can adapt to trophic changes (oligotrophic conditions) as evidence by the trapping of characean gyrogonites by the microbial binding organisms, the charophyte meadows likely occupying the deeper areas of the lake. Finally, facies F3 is interpreted to form in very shallow lake conditions under freshwater to oligo-mesohaline conditions within perennial lake body.

## F4. Carbonate breccia with pseudomorphs after gypsum

The facies F4 is found only in one bed (0.50 m) from the butte Iouton succession (Fig. 8A). It consists of a carbonate breccia displaying vertical changes in texture and diagenetic features. The lower part of the bed is made of a fractured, tight oosparite whose ooids appear to be
floating within sparry calcite pseudomorphs after gypsum (Fig. 8F-G). The mechanical contact between ooids argue for subsequent displacement of the grains in the initial grainstone sediment during the formation and growth of gypsum crystals. The upper part of the breccia interval is characterized by the occurrence of 1) Root traces and curved cracks (Fig. 8D) occluded by microsparite and sparite cements and 2) gypsum crystals, replaced by calcitic micrite, infilling cavities (Fig. 7D-E). These tight limestones have a total thickness of around 50 cm and are irregularly bedded and capped by an uneven surface. Furthermore, these brecciated limestones are overlain by an interval of few centimetres thick of mottled vivid red clays (Fig. 8A).

525

**Interpretation:** the development of curved cracks and root marks affecting the initial oolitic-peloidal grainstones (F1A facies) suggests pedogenic processes during a stage of subaerial exposition (Freytet and Plaziat, 1982; Alonso-Zarza, 2003). Grain displacement during gypsum growth indicate that sulfate precipitation occurred shortly after ooid deposition, before compaction. The presence of calcite pseudomorphs after gypsum would indicate hypersaline conditions within the paleosoil and the enrichment of water in sulphate solutes. Evaporative concentration of solutes and thereby gypsum formation necessarily reflect climate aridity and negative water inflow/evaporation. The F4 succession is therefore interpreted as representing a paleosoil horizon developed during a stage of saline lake drying.

535

### 4.4. Vertical evolution of facies

The Priabonian carbonate succession from the butte Iouton is approximately 30 m thick and is characterized by the dominance of oolitic and peloidal grainstone facies (F1 facies) organized in the form of massive, horizontally bedded intervals associated with fossiliferous muds (F2 facies) and stromatolite levels (F3 facies) found in the form of platelets limestones (Fig. 3).
541

Four massive intervals of oolitic grainstones (F1A facies) and peloidal grainstones (F1B facies) have been identified in the sedimentary succession and have a maximum individual thickness of about 3 m. In addition, the succession records episodic high-energy sedimentation as indicated by the regular occurrence of thin gravelly lenses and coarse-sized sands (F1C facies).

542

543

544

545

Such grain-supported massive intervals are interbedded within thinly-layered limestones of wackestone to packstone texture (Facies F2A, F2B, F2C and F2D) or microbial laminites (Facies F3). The alternation of wackestone-packstone and microbial laminites with massive grainstone intervals allows the definition of 5 depositional cycles, U1 to U5, despite large masked parts (Fig. 2). Within the butte Iouton quarry, the lowermost cycle U1 (3.30 m thick) overlies the lower Eocene variegated clays and silts and displays the transition from thinly layered molluscan-rich ostracod wackestones (F2D facies) to massively bedded peloidal grainstones (F1B facies) and oolitic-peloidal grainstones (F1A facies) with scarce planar cross-stratifications: the base of the massive bed is sharp and contains gravelly-sized fossil shells accumulations (Fig. 3A-3B). The oolitic interval is capped by a subaerial exposure surface as illustrated by the development of brecciated limestones (F4 facies) and overlying paleosol horizon (Fig. 8A).

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

Cycle U2 (4.50 m thick) starts with mud-supported facies (Fig. 3A-3B) dominated by freshwater to oligo-mesohaline molluscans (F2D facies) that pass upwards into oolitic grainstones deposits (F1A facies). Above the thin oolitic bed (Fig. 7A), a 50 cm thick interval of characean-rich laminated bindstones (F3 facies) is overlain by massively bedded peloidal and oolitic grainstones (F1A and F1B facies). These grainstones become coarser and gravelly toward the top and are capped by a thin interval of oncoidal-ooidal grainstone (F1C).

558

559

560

561

562

563

In cycle U3 (6.40 m thick) sediments are dominantly mud-supported (F2 facies) and organized into centimetre to decimeter-thick tabular strata (Fig. 7C). In the lowermost 2 metres, sedimentation is dominated by molluscan-rich ostracod wackestones (F2D facies) and

564

565
molluscan-rich peloidal packstone (F2A facies) together with peloidal micrites with calcite rafts (F2C facies). The upper part of the cycle is dominated by the characean-rich peloidal wackestones and packstones (F2B) and molluscan-rich peloidal packstone (F1A). The top of the cycle displays incipient pedogenic modifications (root traces, circumgranular cracks).

The cycle U4 (6.40 m thick) shows at its base lacustrine stromatolites (F3 facies) that pass upwards into a decimetre thick oncoidal rich grainstones (F1C facies) that gives way to a massively bedded oolitic-peloidal grainstones (F1A facies). At the top, the cycle is capped by a sharp and smooth surface. The uppermost U5 cycle (10.40 m thick) begins with a molluscan-rich ostracodal wackestones containing *Viviparus soricensis* gastropods. After an observational gap of few metres, this cycle ends with a thick oolitic and peloidal grainstone interval that is truncated by an erosional surface. This unconformity separates the Priabonian limestones from the unconformably overlying transgressive marine Burdigalian limestones characterized by the coralline red algae *Lithothamnium sp* and marine bivalves *Pecten praescabriusculus* that rest on the basal conglomerates reworking Priabonian lacustrine limestones (Fig. 3C).

580

## 4.5. Carbon and oxygen stable isotopes

Prior to the analysis of the geochemical data of whole-rock bulk carbon and oxygen stable isotopes and to extract the primary geochemical signal, it is necessary to take into account the diagenetic overprints undergone by the investigated samples. In Table 2, samples have been classified as a function of the diagenetic features evidenced from macroscopic, thin-section and SEM observations. Most of the analysed samples are devoid of sparry calcite cements. In addition, in grainstone intervals (F1 facies), ooids are pervasively micritized, display significant microporosity and microrhombic calcite overgrowths (Fig. 5 C-D), while aragonitic shells are converted into calcitic micrite (Fig. 6E-F). Moderate amounts of calcite microspar cements are
590

present in a few samples of F2A facies while brecciated limestones (F4 facies) have undergone
pervasive pedogenesis and pervasive sparry calcite cementation or calcite pseudomorphosis
after gypsum (Fig. 8 E-G).

591

592

593

In the whole carbonate succession, samples which are devoid of sparry calcite cement and pedogenetic features exhibit negative values of δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C values ranging from -3.99‰ to -1.33‰ PDB and from -4.79‰ to -0.43‰ PDB, respectively (Fig. 10 A-B). Brecciated limestones (F4 facies), which are characterized by pedogenic features and sparry calcite cementation, are strongly ¹³C-depleted. Grainstone samples (F1 facies) exhibit an inverted-J pattern on δ¹⁸O-δ¹³C plots (Fig. 10 A).

594

595

596

597

598

599

Measurements from cycle U1 display a very narrow range of δ¹³C since values which oscillate between -2.54‰ and -1.40‰ PDB while δ¹⁸O values exhibit a moderately increasing trend, with values ranging from -2.87‰ to -2.02‰ PDB (Fig. 10 B). At the top of U1, δ¹³C is strongly negative with values down to -5.21‰ PDB. A poorly-expressed covariant trend exists between δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O within this cycle, especially in the oolitic-peloidal grainstones which corresponds to a part of the inverted-J trend. In cycle U2, δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C signals have much wider ranges of values (-3.35‰ to -1.86‰ PDB and -2.29‰ to -0.76‰ PDB respectively) and grainstone samples (F1 facies) exhibit a covariant trend similar to that of U1 cycle (Fig. 10 C). In the lower part of cycle U2, stromatolites exhibit the most ¹³C-enriched and ¹⁸O-depleted signatures of the available database. In cycle U3, δ¹⁸O values display little variations and range between -3.66‰ and -2.64‰ PDB whereas δ¹³C fluctuates considerably with values ranging from -2.09‰ to -0.43‰ PDB (Fig. 10 D). Within cycles U4 and U5, samples exhibit wide ranges of δ¹⁸O with values ranging from -3.99‰ to -1.33‰ PDB and δ¹³C ranging from -4.79‰ to -0.53‰ PDB. Stromatolites (F3) forming the lower part of the cycle display depleted ¹⁸O and enriched ¹³C isotope signatures.

600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614
615

**5. Discussion**

616

**5.1 Depositional model for an oolitic saline lake margin**

617

618

619

620

621

622

The analysis of carbonate microfacies, preserved biota, bedding patterns and sedimentary structures of individual lithofacies as well as the vertical succession of lithofacies enable the reconstruction of depositional models (Fig. 11) for further interpreting the vertical evolution of paleoenvironments and stages of transgression and regression of the paleolake.

***Oolitic cycles (U1, U2, U4 and U5)***

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

638

639

The lower intervals of the oolitic-peloidal cycles U1, U2, U4 and U5 are made of molluscan-rich ostracod wackestones (F2D) and laminated bindstones (F3). As suggested by microfacies analysis and preserved biota, such a facies association is indicative of a deposition in a very shallow, sub-emergent, low-energy, freshwater to oligo-mesohaline lake margin. The occurrence of scattered but well preserved ooids within the molluscan-ostracodal wackestones suggests that oolitic sediments formed coevally with the F2D-F3 low-energy lake margin association. In cycles U1, U2, U4 and U5, microbial laminites or molluscan-ostracodal wackestones are sharply overlain by oolitic-peloidal (F1A) or peloidal grainstones (F1B). The high degree of sorting in oolitic-peloidal grainstone, the lack of mud matrix and the occurrence of planar cross laminations suggest an increase in water energy compared with the underlying F2D and F3 facies. The planar cross-bedded oolitic grainstones (F1A) were likely deposited at the outer part of a lacustrine margin, in the vicinity of the main oolitic factory as supported by the dominant proportion of ooids. Indeed, the significant proportion of peloids as well as the variable degree of micritization of ooids suggest that the oolitic fraction of F1A is not produced in situ but likely derives from neighbouring, high-energy, oolitic shoals. Structureless oolitic-peloidal and peloidal grainstones (F1A-F1B) likely represent a slightly calmer area, possibly in back-shoal position. The structureless nature of such carbonate sand blankets has been
640

interpreted, in shallow marine environments, as resulting from significant bioturbation of a
stable substrate in a low to moderate energy back-shoal environments (Pomar et al., 2015).

641

642

Additionally, peloidal grainstones exhibit significant proportions of peloidal aggregates which are interpreted to form, in modern marine environments, in area with some water circulation allowing the winnowing of fines, followed by periods of stabilization (Wanless, 1981). Finally, the vertical facies transition recorded in cycles U1, U2, U4 and U5 suggests a lake transgression and a lacustrine carbonate ramp model (Fig. 11) displaying the following facies transition from proximal to distal areas: 1) a shallow marginal saline lake domain with deposition of planar microbial laminites (F3), and molluscan-ostracodal wackestone (F2D), 2) a more distal and open lacustrine environments with low to moderate energy characterized by the deposition of peloidal grainstones (F1B) and 3) a domain of higher energy with accumulation of ooids mixed with peloids (F1A). The area of ooid production as well as more distal (profundal) components of this lacustrine depositional model have not been captured by the studied outcrops.

643

644

645

646

647

648

649

650

651

652

653

Carbonate ramp models with oolite sand body development in open, shallow lacustrine setting have been documented in modern and ancient lacustrine environments. In the modern Great Salt Lake, similarly to the Butte Iouton lake margin, muddy sediments occupy the coastal area of the lake while oolite sand bodies develop in more open lake setting (Eardley, 1938, Bouton et al., 2019). In the Eocene Green River Formation (Utah), shoreline and protected nearshore carbonate sedimentation is characterized by mud-supported sediments with ostracods, mollusks and ooids, while shallow open lake margin is occupied by oolitic shoals (Williamson and Picard, 1974; Tänavsuu-Milkeviciene et al., 2017). In the Upper Cretaceous to Paleocene Yacoraite Formation (Argentina), a high gradient carbonate ramp model is proposed with ostracod-rich low energy eulittoral deposits protected by oolitic shoals (Deschamps et al., 2020). In the modern Lake Tanganyika, oolitic sand shoals dominate the open nearshore

654

655

656

657

658

659

660

661

662

663
664

environment while inner and more protected area are characterized by charophyte-rich
calcareous silts (Cohen and Thouin, 1987).

665

666

The Butte Iouton lake margin shows major differences with other published depositional
models involving oolite formation. In the Pliocene Glenns Ferry Oolite (Swirydczuk et al.,
1980), oolite sediments occupy both foreshore and shoreface environments and no mud-rich,
low energy, carbonate deposits are documented from this lake margin. In the late Triassic
Clevedon lake, shoreline deposits are dominated by oolitic beachrocks while trough cross-
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000

667

668

669

670

671

672

673

Mud-dominated cycle (U3)

674

Cycle U3 exhibits a distinct facies association since ooids are relatively uncommon and
sediments have dominantly muddy textures. The lower part of the cycle is characterized by an
alternation of molluscan-rich peloidal packstones (F2A), peloidal wackestones to packstones
with calcitic rafts (F2C) and molluscan-rich ostracod wackestones (F2D).

675

676

677

678

Similarly to cycles U1, U2, U4 and U5, the occurrence of F2D wackestones is indicative of
very shallow, low energy environments, in the most proximal area of the lake margin. The upper
part of the cycle is dominated by F2B characean wackestone which likely represents a slightly
deeper (<10 m), low-energy marginal lake environment.

679

680

681

682

Finally, the facies succession in cycle U3 suggests a shallow, protected, low energy lake margin
with extensive development of macrophytes (including charophytes and non-calcifying taxa).
The scarce occurrence of ooids within F2D facies suggests the coeval formation of oolitic
sediment in more open area of the lake margin. However, the lack of oolitic grainstones indicate
that the supersaturation with regards to carbonate minerals required for ooid formation and high

683

684

685

686
687 energy conditions have been never reached at the outcrop location during the deposition of U3
688 cycle.

689

690 **5.2 Stable isotope signatures and paleohydrological implications**

691 As evidenced by Hasiuk et al. (2016) and as supported by petrographic evidences
692 (microporosity and microrhombic calcite overgrowths within micritized ooids: Fig. 5C-D), the
693 inverted-J pattern on δ¹⁸O-δ¹³C plots (Fig. 10A) evidenced for grainstones from the whole
694 section, likely results from neomorphic processes leading to microporosity development in
695 meteoric environments. According to such an interpretation the δ¹⁸O- and δ¹³C-enriched end-
696 member would represent the less-altered samples and therefore would approximate the primary
697 signature of carbonate grains (ooids and peloids), the ooidal and peloidal grainstone being
698 devoid of carbonate cement. Furthermore, the end-member of least meteoric alteration for
699 grainstone samples (F1) ranges from -2.5‰ to 1.0‰ PDB in δ¹⁸O and from -2.0‰ and -0.5‰
700 PDB in δ¹³C, which matches with primary signatures measured in late Priabonian ooid-bearing
701 unit (Unit 2 in Letteron et al., 2017) from the Issirac basin (Fig. 10 A). Carbon and oxygen
702 isotope signatures for wackestone-packstones (F2) and microbial laminites (F3) are
703 significantly ¹⁸O-depleted compared to the end-member of least meteoric alteration for
704 grainstones (F1). The ¹⁸O-depletion of stromatolites likely results from significant freshwater
705 inputs while the ¹⁸O-enriched values measured in F1 grainstones may reflect either more
706 evaporative conditions, either mixture with neighbouring saline lake water as suggested by
707 primary isotope signatures from the Issirac basin (Fig. 10 A). The position of the Priabonian
708 marine box (Fig. 10 A, after Veizer et al., 1999) makes also possible a mixture with marine-
709 influenced waters. Additionally, the relative ¹³C-enrichement could be partly related to a
710 photosynthetic control on the carbon budget of the lake during the deposition of microbial
711 (cyanobacterial) carbonates (Talbot and Kelts, 1990; Andrews et al., 1993; 1997), as
712

particularly evidenced in microbial laminites (F3) from cycles U2, U3, U4 and U5 (Fig. 10 C-D-E) and by the vertical trend in the δ¹³C-δ¹⁸O plot from U3.

713

714

In cycle U1, a poorly-expressed covariant trend exists between δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O (Fig. 10B), especially in the oolitic-peloidal grainstones which coincides with a segment of the overall inverted-J trend. Even though such an isotope trend likely largely result from neomorphic processes affecting micrite in meteoric environments (Léonide et al., 2014; Hasiuk et al., 2016) as suggested by petrographic observations, the interpretation of a partial preservation of a primary covariant trend cannot be entirely ruled out. Such primary covariant trends have been reported from a variety of modern lacustrine carbonates and are interpreted to result from hydrologic closure of the lake for long time periods and varying residence time of water and dissolve inorganic carbon (e.g. Talbot, 1990; Li and Ku, 1997).

715

716

717

718

719

720

721

722

723

The strongly negative excursion of δ¹³C at top of cycle U1 (Fig. 9) reflects the formation of pedogenic carbonates during a phase of subaerial exposition (e.g. Allan and Matthews, 1982). Negative δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C excursion at top of cycles U2 and U4 suggest that the cycle is capped by a subaerial exposure surface (Fig. 9) in spite of the lack of petrographic evidence. Finally, the negative δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C excursion at top of U4 (Fig. 9) suggests that the cycle is capped by an intraformational subaerial exposure surface, while the very negative values at top of U5 are likely to be related to meteoric overprint during the long-duration subaerial exposure preceding the Burdigalian transgression.

724

725

726

727

728

729

730

731

732

## 5.3 Origin of transgressive-regressive cycles

733

The vertical succession of lithofacies and associated depositional environments, together with stable isotope signatures allows the identification of transgressive-regressive cycles (Fig. 9) and the reconstruction of lake margin evolution and changes in paleohydrologic setting. In cycles

734

735
U1, U2, U4 and U5, the upward vertical facies change from mud-supported fabrics (F2 facies) or microbial laminites (F3 facies) from shallow and sheltered lake margin environments to oolitic and peloidal grainstones (F1A-B) deposited in moderate to high energy perennial waterbody records the lake transgression. The maximum flooding stage therefore occurs within the oolitic grainstone beds (F1A) which represents the most distal facies identified in the section. Pedogenetic features as well as carbon isotope signatures (Fig. 9) strongly suggest a subaerial exposition on top of these cycles which reflects the stage of maximum regression of the lake.

In the upper part of cycle U1, the abrupt upward vertical change in facies from oolitic-peloidal grainstone F1A to pedogenitized carbonate breccia (F4) together with the occurrence of pseudomorphs after gypsum are indicative of a forced lacustrine regression related to drying of the lake. In other oolitic cycles (U2, U4 and U5), the forced regressive stage is recorded by the subaerial exposure surfaces which sharply truncate the massive oolitic/peloidal grainstone intervals. It seems plausible to consider significant erosion during the forced regressive phase or during the early transgressive phase, as suggested by the lack of marginal/palustrine deposits preserved on top of these cycles. Moreover, it is not excluded that part of grainstone intervals has formed during a stage of normal regression. As an apparent paradox, the stable isotope signatures are indicative of greater freshwater inputs with the wackestone (F2) and microbialitic (F3) beds (lower transgressive hemicycle) than in grainstone intervals (upper transgression to normal regression?) where they suggest either a more negative inflow-evaporation balance, or a mixture with a closed lake water body or even seawater. Similarly, the vertical changes in molluscan assemblages do not indicate a salinity decrease during transgression, but on the contrary the few freshwater taxa identified (e.g. *Viviparus*, *Lymnaea*, *Planorbis*) are mainly present in the wackestone and microbialitic facies from the lower transgressive hemicycles (Fig. 2). In contrast to other lake basins (e.g. Holocene, Dead Sea: Klinger et al., 2003; Plio-
761 Pleistocene, Lake Turkana: Nutz et al., 2020), lake transgression does not result from an excess
762 balance between freshwater inflow and evaporation. A lack of unequivocal control of
763 paleohydrologic balance on transgressive/regressive cycle development has been regionally
764 evidenced in coeval lake margin carbonate deposits from the Issirac and Saint-Chaptes basins
765 (Letteron et al., 2017, 2018, 2022), but also in other syn-tectonic lake basins (Chen and Hu,
766 2017).

767 Such a paradox can be explained by an increasing connexion of the Butte Iouton lake waters
768 with regional salt waterbodies during transgression. This interpretation therefore implies that
769 the lake basin to which the Butte Iouton carbonate margin represented an outflow of
770 neighbouring salt water bodies. The volume of connected lake waters is controlled by a regional
771 inflow-evaporation balance which is strongly dependent on climate conditions. In the case of
772 Priabonian lakes from south-east France, lake closure and saline waters are associated with
773 semi-arid conditions prevailing at regional scale (Letteron et al., 2017, 2018). In contrast, the
774 dominantly transgressive pattern of cycles evidenced in Butte Iouton margin likely results from
775 both 1) local subsidence driven by normal faults in a regional extensional tectonic setting which
776 is known regionally to have started as early as the middle Priabonian (Cavelier et al., 1984;
777 Sanchis and Seranne, 2000) and 2) saline water outflow from neighbouring regional
778 waterbodies. Forced regression stages recorded at top of depositional cycles may result from:
779 1) periods of increased aridity associated with a fast and significant reduction in connected lake
780 volume, or 2) the formation of an outlet which led to the fast emptying of the lake basin (Garcia-
781 Castellanos, 2006).

782 In Cycle U3, the upward vertical transition from the F2C and F2D wackestone/packstone
783 indicative of very sheltered and shallow area of the lake margin to characean wackestones (F2B)
784 suggests a transgressive trend. Similarly to oolitic cycles, molluscan assemblages and isotope
785 signatures are indicative of a connexion with a salt waterbody (evaporative or seawater-
influenced lake), while the ¹³C-enrichment is likely to be related to the effect of enhanced photosynthetic activity (e.g. Coletta et al., 2001; Leng and Marshall, 2004), which is consistent with the extensive development of charophytes, cyanobacteria and possibly non-calcifying macrophytes. A subaerial exposition on top of cycle U4 is evidenced from the occurrence of pedogenic features (root-traces).

791

## 5.4. The Butte Iouton outcrop: a preserved relict of a regional-scale saline lake?

The vertical evolution of depositional environments and lake salinity recorded at Butte Iouton outcrop provide significant insights into the paleogeography of Priabonian paleolakes at a larger regional scale. The lack of decreasing salinity trends within the carbonate cycles, as evidenced from the persistence of oligo-mesohaline mollusks, as well as the carbon and oxygen isotope signatures strongly suggest that the transgressive trends recorded by the vertical facies evolution at Butte Iouton is not related to an increase in lake water volume resulting from an increasing inflow-evaporation balance. The present data rather support the interpretation of a carbonate sedimentation in a subsident lake basin which is fed by the outflow of adjacent saline lakes. The relatively dry conditions evidenced regionally by Priabonian lacustrine sedimentation (Lettéron et al., 2017; 2018; 2022) suggest that salinity may derive, at least partly, from a negative inflow-evaporation balance, but a salinization by recycling evaporites in the drainage area of the lake or within the lake itself is a possible interpretation. Indeed, as evidenced by Emre and Truc (1978), the erosion of the piercing Suzette diapir and subsequent sulfate recycling occurred coevally with the late Priabonian carbonate and evaporite sedimentation of the Mormoiron basin (~50 km north of Butte Iouton: Fig. 12). Additionally, connections with the Alpine Sea through topographic corridors may represent a possible origin for salinity in regional Priabonian lakes (Sissingh, 2001) even though a continental origin for evaporites from
810
811

the Valence basin has been inferred from stable isotope and mineralogical analyses (Fontes, et al., 1996).

812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829

The Butte Iouton outcrop is located within a 20 km-wide corridor bounded by the Nîmes fault to the NW and structured by set of SW-NE-trending normal faults (Fig. 1A). To the southeast a thick (>4000m) lacustrine sedimentation occurred in the Vistrenque Basin (Valette and Benedicto, 1995; Benedicto et al., 1996). Although the age of the lowermost syn-rift interval (Série Grise Formation: ~2000 m-thick) is unknown, the similarity in depositional polarity (siliciclatic-dominated the south and carbonate-dominated the north) between the Série Grise Formation and the Célas formation from the Sommières, Saint-Chaptes and Alès basins may suggest a Priabonian age for the lower part of the syn-rift sedimentation in the Vistrenque basin, as suggested by Cavelier et al., (1984). According to this hypothesis, the Butte Iouton outcrop would represent the northern shallow carbonate margin of a lake basin fed in siliciclastics from the southern collapsing Pyrenean reliefs. Additionally, the strike-slip movement of the Nîmes fault during a transitional tectonic phase comprised between the Pyrenean compression and the Gulf of Lion rifting (Séranne et al., 2021) is consistent with the formation of a subsiding strike-slip basin, east of the Nîmes fault, capable to accumulate a thick sedimentary cover as early as the Priabonian times. The Série Grise Formation from the Vistrenque Basin is dominantly made of organic-rich shales interbedded with thin sandstone and conglomerate horizons (Cavelier et al., 1984; Valette and Benedicto, 1995) suggesting profundal lake environments with terrigenous supplies.

830
831
832
833
834

On the footwall of the Nîmes fault, a small-sized and isolated lacustrine limestone outcrop was documented by Caziot (1896) at Puech d'Autel, within the city of Nîmes. These limestones contain a molluscan association including *Melanoides juliani*, *Brotia albigensis*, *Melanopsis acrolepta*, *Neritina*, *Galba longiscata* which is highly similar to that of the oligohaline, late Priabonian lacustrine limestones from the Issirac basin (Lettéron et al., 2017) and the Butte
835

Iouton. As a consequence, the Puech d'Autel limestones likely represent a relict outcrop of the northwestern shallow carbonate margin of the Vistrenque lake basin.

836

837

The proximity of the Priabonian outcrops from the Sommières and Saint-Chaptes basins (10 km) makes a connection with the ASCI saline lake strongly possible. Additionally, in the Issirac basin, Lettéron et al. (2017) argued for a correlation between maximum lacustrine transgressions and periods with the most deficient inflow-evaporation balance. These authors interpreted this apparent paradox as resulting from a connection of the Issirac lake waters with those of the Mormoiron and Vistrenque basins, during a period of relative aridity.

838

839

840

841

842

843

The presence of isolated outcrops of Priabonian lacustrine limestones with brackish fauna, 10 km northeast of the eastern termination of the Saint-Chaptes basin, near Uzès (BRGM, 1968) (Fig. 12), shows that the ASCI lake basin had a significantly wider extension towards the east and that a connection with the Vistrenque basin is a plausible hypothesis. As a consequence, various potential sills which could have connected the ASCI lake system with the Vistrenque-Mormoiron may be identified west of the Nîmes fault. More broadly, the dominant transgressive character of depositional sequences recorded locally in various Priabonian carbonate lake margins from southeast France (Issirac: Lettéron et al., 2017; Saint-Chaptes: Lettéron et al., 2018; Alès: Lettéron et al., 2022; Butte Iouton: this study) associated with a persistence of oligo-mesohaline waters in a context of negative inflow-evaporation balance is indicative of interconnected, subsiding lacustrine area, the total volume of connected waters being much larger than that of individual lake basin (Fig. 12).

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851

852

853

854

855

Finally, the oolitic carbonate ramp developing on the margins of the Vistrenque lake margin show significant analogies with various marine oolitic ramps regarding the overall facies model (e.g. Mississipian from Wales: Burchette et al., 1990; Upper Jurassic from Spain: Pomar et al., 2015; Jurassic from Morocco: Shekhar et al., 2014): 1) oolite shoal developing on the outer ramp, 2) poorly structured oolitic grainstones forming in backshoal setting, 3) mud-supported

856

857

858

859
860 and/or microbial carbonates developing in the low-energy, innermost area of the ramp and 4)

861 the ramp distally passes into deep water environments.

862
863

# 6. Conclusion

864

865

The integrative approach (biostratigraphy, paleoecology, carbonate petrography, sedimentology and stable isotope geochemistry) applied to the study of lacustrine carbonates from Butte Iouton outcrops allowed reconstructing a depositional model for an oolitic saline lake margin and providing new insights into the Priabonian paleogeography of southeast France.

866

867

868

869

1) An oolitic lacustrine ramp model has been evidenced and displays the following facies transition from proximal to distal areas: 1) a shallow marginal saline lake domain with deposition of planar microbial laminites, and molluscan-ostracodal wackestone, 2) a more distal and open lacustrine environments with low to moderate energy characterized by the deposition of peloidal grainstones and 3) a domain of higher energy with accumulation of ooids mixed with peloids. The area of ooid production (not captured by the studied outcrops) likely consisted in oolitic shoals within a high energy outer ramp setting.

870

871

872

873

874

875

876

2) Carbonate sedimentation dominantly occurred during stages of lake transgression. Subaerial exposure surfaces evidenced at top of depositional cycles are interpreted to result from forced regressions which occurred during periods of negative inflow-evaporation balance.

877

878

879

3) Molluscan associations suggest that oligo- to mesohaline waters dominantly prevailed during the studied time interval.

880

881

4) The apparent paradox between a dominant transgressive sedimentation and the persistence of saline conditions suggest that lake transgression is controlled by subsidence and outflows from neighbouring saline waterbodies, and not by an increase in regional lake water volume. The studied carbonate margin belongs to a set of interconnected saline lake waterbodies whose total volume is much greater than that created locally by subsidence.

882

883

884

885

886

5) The compilation of existing data regarding regional Priabonian deposits supports the interpretation of interconnected saline lake basins characterized by a siliciclastic-dominated southern margin whose sediment is sourced from the collapsing Pyrenean reliefs and by a

887

888
carbonate-dominated northern margin with significant oolitic sedimentation in high-energy
nearshore area.

891

892 References

Allan JR, Matthews, R. 1982. Isotope signatures associated with early meteoric diagenesis.
*Sedimentology* 29 (6): 797-817.

Alonso-Zarza AM. 2003. Palaeoenvironmental significance of palustrine carbonates and
calcretes in the geological record. *Earth-Science Reviews* 60: 261–298.

Andrews JE, Riding R, Dennis PF. 1993. Stable isotopic composition of recent freshwater
cyanobacterial carbonates from the British Isles: local and regional environmental controls.
*Sedimentology* 40: 303–314.

Andrews JE, Riding R, Dennis PF. 1997. The stable isotopic record of environmental and
climatic signals in modern terrestrial microbial carbonates from Europe. *Palaeogeogr*
*Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol* 129: 171–189.

Arenas C, Cabrera L, Ramos E. 2007. Sedimentology of tufa facies and continental
microbialites from the Paleogene of Mallorca Island (Spain). *Sedimentary Geology* 197: 1-27.

Arthaud F, Ogier M, Séguret M. 1981. Géologie et géophysique du Golfe du Lion et de sa
bordure nord. *Bulletin du BRGM* 1(3): 175-193.

Benedicto A, Labaume P, Séguret M, Séranne M. 1996. Low-angle crustal ramp and basin
geometry in the Gulf of Lion passive margin: the Oligocene-Aquitanian Vistrenque graben, SE
France. *Tectonics* 15(6): 1192–1212.
910

BRGM. 1968. Notice de la carte géologique de la France au 1/50000: feuille Uzès n°939 : 12

911

pp.

912

Bodergat A-M, Briot D, Hugueney M, Poidevin J-L, Picot L, Giraud F, Berger J.P, Levy A,

913

Poignant A. 1999. Incursions marines dans l'environnement lacustre du rift oligocène de

914

Limagne (Massif Central, France) : apport des organismes halophiles et des isotopes du

915

strontium, datation par les mammifères. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 170: 499–

916

511.

917

Bouton A, Vennin E, Amiotte-Suchet P, Thomazo C, Sizun, J-P, Virgone A, Gaucher EC,

918

Visscher PT. 2019. Prediction of the calcium carbonate budget in a sedimentary basin: A

919

“source-to-sink” approach applied to Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA. *Basin Research* 32, 1005–

920

1034.

921

Briot D, Poidevin JL. 1998. Stratigraphie 87Sr/86Sr de quelques laminites carbonates du

922

Rupélien inférieur du fossé de Limagne: incursions marines dans le rift du Massif central

923

français?. *Compte Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris* 236: 479–483.

924

Burchette TP, Wright VP, Faulkner TJ. 1990. Oolitic sandbody depositional models and

925

geometries, Mississippian of southwest Britain: implications for petroleum exploration in

926

carbonate ramp settings. *Sedimentary Geology* 68: 87-115.

927

Cavelier C, Alabouvette G, Amberger J-P, Cautru J-P, Charollais J, Chateauneuf J-J, Crochet

928

J-Y, Campredon R, Debeglia N, Durand J-P, Feist-Castel M, Freytet P, Gannat E, Gaudant J,

929

Giannerini G, Godinot M, Hartenberger J-L, Hugueney M, Kerckhove C, Lefavrais-Raymond

930

A, Legendre S, Lespinasse P, Magne J, Nury D, Pairis J-L, Plaziat J-C, Rémy J-A, Schlund J-

931

M, Sige, B, Sittler C, Sudre J, Trauth N, Truc G, Valleron M-M, Vianney-Liaud M, Villatte, J.

932

1984. Paléogène. In : Debrand-Passard ed., *Synthèse géologique du Sud-Est de la France*.

933

*Mémoire du BRGM* 125 : pp. 389-468.
934

Caziot M. 1896. Sur le Tertiaire inférieur des environs de Nîmes. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 24: 1-32.

935

936

Chen M, Hu X. 2017. Regression-transgression cycles of paleolakes in the Fen River Graben Basin during the mid to late Quaternary and their tectonic implication. *Frontiers in Earth Sciences* 11(4): 703-714.

937

938

939

Cohen AS, Thouin C. 1987. Nearshore carbonate deposits in Lake Tanganyika. *Geology* 15: 414-418.

940

941

Coletta P, Pentecost A, Spiro B. 2001. Stable isotopes in charophyte incrustations: relationships with climate and water chemistry. *Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology* 173: 9-19.

942

943

944

Daley B. 1972. Macroinvertebrate assemblages from the Bembridge marls (Oligocene) of the Isle of Wight, England, and their environmental significance. *Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology* 11(1): 11-32.

945

946

947

Dalrymple RW. 1992. Tidal depositional systems. In: R. G. Walker and N. P. James, eds. *Facies Models and Sea Level Changes, Geological Association of Canada: 195-218*.

948

949

Davaud E, Girardclos S. 2001. Recent freshwater ooids and oncoids from western Lake Geneva (Switzerland): indications of a common organically mediated origin. *Journal of Sedimentary Research* 71(3): 423-429.

950

951

952

De Roys M. 1846. Note sur la comparaison des bassins tertiaires du Midi avec celui de Paris. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* (2ème série) (3): 645-652.

953

954

Deschamps R, Rohais S, Hamon Y, Gasparrini M. 2020. Dynamic of a lacustrine sedimentary system during late rifting at the Cretaceous-Paleocene transition: Example of the Yacoraite Formation, Salta Basin, Argentina. *The depositional Record* 6: 490-523.

955

956
957

Dèzes P, Schmid S.M, Ziegler P.A. 2004. Evolution of the European Cenozoic Rift System:

958

interaction of the Alpine and Pyrenean orogens with their foreland lithosphere. *Tectonophysics*

959

389: 1–33.

960

Dromart G, Dumas D. 1997. The salt basin of Valence (France). In: Busson G, Schreiber B.C.

961

eds., Sedimentary Deposition in Rift and Foreland Basins in France and Spain. Columbia Univ.

962

Press, New York: pp. 195–239.

963

Dumas E. 1876. Statistique Géologique, Minéralogique, Métallurgique et Paléontologiques du

964

Département du Gard. Arthus Bertrand ed. : 735 pp.

965

Dunham RJ. 1962. Classification of Carbonate Rocks According to Depositional Texture. In:

966

Ham, W.E., Ed., Classification of Carbonate Rocks, AAPG, Tulsa, 108-121.

967

Eardley AJ. 1938. Sediments of Great Salt Lake, Utah. AAPG Bulletin 22, 1305–1411.

968

Embry AF, Klovan JE. (1971) A Late Devonian Reef Tract on Northeastern Banks Island.

969

Canadian Petroleum Geology, 19, 730-781.

970

Emre T, Truc G. 1978. Mise en évidence d'un contact discordant Oligocène-Trias dans le

971

massif de Suzette. Implciations tectoniques et conséquences sur l'origine des évaporites

972

ludiennes du bassin de Mormoiron (Vaucluse). *Géologie Alpine* 54: 17–23.

973

Esu D, Girotti O. 2010. The Late Oligocene Molluscan Fauna from Otranto (Apulia, Southern

974

Italy): an example of alternating freshwater, lagoonal and emerged

975

environments. *Palaeontology* 53(1): 137-174.

976

Fontannes F. 1884. Description sommaire de la faune malacologique des formations saumâtres

977

et d'eau douce du groupe d'Aix (Bartonien – Aquitanien) dans le bas Languedoc, la Provence

978

et le Dauphiné. Georg H, Lyon, and Savy F, Paris: 60 pp.
979

Fontes J-C, Filly A, Gaudant J, Duringer P. 1991. Origine continentale des évaporites paléogènes de Haute Alsace : arguments paléoécologiques, sédimentologiques et isotopiques. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 162: 725-737.

980

981

982

Fontes J-C, Gaudant J, Mélières F, Filly A, Schlund J-M. 1996. Origine continentale des évaporites paléogènes du fossé de Valence (Drôme): données minéralogiques, isotopiques et paléoécologiques. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 167(4): 475-481.

983

984

985

Fretter V, Graham A. (1978). The prosobranch molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 3 – Neritacea, Viviparacea, Valvatacea, terrestrial and freshwater Littorinacea and Rissoacea. *Journal of Molluscan Studies*. Suppl. 5: 1-152.

986

987

988

Freytet P, Plaziat J-C. 1982. Continental carbonate sedimentation and pedogenesis – Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary of Southern France. In: Purser B. H. ed., *Contribution to Sedimentology, Schweizerbartsche Verlag*, Stuttgart, 12: 217 pp.

989

990

991

Gallois A, Bosence D, Burgess PM. 2018. Brackish to hypersaline facies in lacustrine carbonates: Purbeck Limestone Group, Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous, Wessex Basin, Dorset, UK. *Facies* 64, 12.

992

993

994

Garcia A. 1994. Charophyta: their use in paleolimnology. *Journal of Paleolimnology* 10(1): 43-52.

995

996

Garcia A, Chivas A.R. 2006. Diversity and ecology of extant and Quaternary Australian charophytes (Charales). *Cryptogamie Algologie* 27(4): 323-340.

997

998

Garcia-Castellanos D. 2006. Long-term evolution of tectonic lakes: Climatic controls on the development of internally drained basins. *Geological Society of America Special Paper* 398: 283-294.

1000
1001 Gorini C, Le Marrec A, Mauffret A. 1993. Contribution to the structural and sedimentary
1002 history of the Gulf of Lions (western Mediterranean), from the ECORS profiles, industrial
1003 seismic profiles and well data. *Bulletin de la Société géologique de France* 164(3): 353-363.

1004 Grambast L, Grambast-Fessard N. 1981. Étude sur les Charophytes tertiaires d'Europe
1005 occidentale III: le Genre Gyrogona. *Paléobiologie Continentale* 12(2): 1-35.

1006 Hargrave JE, Hicks MK, Scholz CA. 2014. Lacustrine carbonates from Lake Turkana, Kenya: a depositional model of carbonates in an extensional basin. *Journal of Sedimentary Research* 84: 224-237.

1009 Harris M, Faulkner P, Asmussen B. 2015. Macroscopic approaches to the identification of
1010 expedient bivalve tools: a case study investigating polymesoda (=Geloina) coaxans (Bivalvia:
1011 Corbiculidae) shell valves from Princess Charlotte Bay, Queensland, Australia. *Quaternary
1012 International* 427: 201-215.

1013 Hasiuk FJ, Kaczmarek SE, Fullmer SM. 2016. Diagenetic origins of the calcite microcrystals
1014 that host microposity in limestone reservoirs. *Journal of Sedimentary Research*, 86, 1163-1178.

1015 Kahle CF. 1974. Ooids from Great Salt Lake, Utah, as analogue for the genesis and diagenesis
1016 of ooids in marine limestones. *Journal of Sedimentary Geology* 44(1): 30-39.

1017 Klinger Y, Avouac J-P, Bourlès D, Tisnérat N. 2003. Alluvial deposition and lake-level
1018 fluctuations forced by Late Quaternary climate change: the Dead Sea case example.
1019 *Sedimentary Geology*: 162 (1-2): 119-139.

1020 Leng MJ, Marshall JD. 2004. Palaeoclimate interpretation of stable isotope data from lake
1021 sediment archives. *Quaternary Science Reviews* 23(7-8): 811-831.

1022 Léonide P, Fournier, F, Reijmer JJG, Vonhof H, Borgomano J, Dijk J, Rosenthal M, van
1023 Goethem M, Cochard J, Meulenaars K. 2014. Diagenetic patterns and pore space distribution
1024 along a platform to outer-shelf transect (Urgonian limestone, Barremian-Aptian, SE France).

1025 *Sedimentary Geology*: 306, 1-28.

1026 Lesueur J-L. 1991. Etude sédimentologique et stratigraphique du Bassin Paléogène d'Apt-

1027 Manosque-Forcalquier (Alpes de Haute Provence). Modalités de la transition Burdigalienne.

1028 Ph.D. thesis, University M. de Montaigne, Bordeaux III, France : 407 pp.

1029 Lettéron A. 2018. Caractérisation sédimentologique, stratigraphique et paléoenvironnementale

1030 du système carbonaté lacustre à salinité variable du bassin d'Alès et des régions limitrophes

1031 (Priabonien, SE France) : implications paléoclimatiques et paléogéographiques. PhD thesis,

1032 Aix-Marseille University : 344 pp.

1033 Lettéron A, Fournier F, Hamon Y, Villier L, Margerel J-P, Bouche A, Feist M, Joseph P. 2017.

1034 Multi-proxy paleoenvironmental reconstruction of saline lake carbonates: Paleoclimatic and

1035 paleogeographic implications (Priabonian-Rupelian, Issirac Basin, SE France). *Sedimentary*

1036 *Geology* 358 : 97-120.

1037 Lettéron A, Hamon Y, Fournier F, Séranne M, Pellenard P, Joseph P. 2018. Reconstruction of

1038 a saline, lacustrine carbonate system (Priabonian, St-Chaptes Basin, SE France): depositional

1039 models, paleogeographic and paleoclimatic implications. *Sedimentary Geology* 367: 20-47.

1040 Lettéron A, Hamon Y, Fournier F, Demory F, Séranne M, Joseph P. 2022. Stratigraphic

1041 architecture of a saline lake system: From lake depocenter (Alès Basin) to margins (Saint-

1042 Chaptes and Issirac basins), Eocene-Oligocene transition, south-east France. *Sedimentology*,

1043 *Blackwell Publishing, in press*, (DOI: 10.1111/sed.12920), (hal-03406458).

1044 Li H-C, Ku.-L. 1997. δ¹³C-δ¹⁸O covariance as a paleohydrological indicator for closed-basin

1045 lakes. *Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology* 133: 69-80.

1046
Mauffret A, Gorini C. 1996. Structural style and geodynamic evolution of Camargue and Western Provençal basin, southeastern France. *Tectonophysics* 15(2): 356-375.

Ménillet F. 1973. Carte géologique de la France au 1/50000, feuille Nîmes, BRGM Edition.

Milroy PG, Wright VP. 2002. Fabrics, facies control and diagenesis of lacustrine ooids and associated grains from the Upper Triassic, southwest England. *Geological Journal* 37: 35-53.

Miranda NAF, Perissinotto R, Appleton CC. 2010. Salinity and temperature tolerance of the invasive freshwater gastropod *Tarebia granifera*. *South African Journal of Science* 106(3/4): Art. #156, 7 pages. DOI: 10.4102/sajs.v106i3/4.156.

Morton B, 1983. Mangrove bivalves. In: Russell-Hunter, W.D. ed., *The Mollusca* 6, Academic Press, Orlando: pp. 77-138.

Nutz A, Schuster M, Barboni D, Gassier G, Van Bocxlaer B, Robin C, Ragon T, Ghienne J-F, Rubino J-L. 2020. Plio-Pleistocene sedimentation in West Turkana (Turkana Depression, Kenya, East African Rift System): Paleolake fluctuations, paleolandscapes and controlling factors. *Earth Science Reviews* 111: 103415.

Pellat E, Allard M. 1895. Dépôts lacustres de la Butte Iouton entre Comps et Beaucaire (Gard). *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 23: 434-436.

Plaziat J-C, Younis WR. 2005. The modern environments of Molluscs in southern Mesopotamia, Iraq: A guide to paleogeographical reconstructions of Quaternary fluvial, palustrine and marine deposits. *Carnets de Géologie* 2005/01, (18pp).

Pomar L, Aurell M, Badenas B, Morsilli M, Al-Awwad S.F. 2015. Depositional model for a prograding oolitic wedge, Upper Jurassic, Iberian basin. *Marine and Petroleum Geology* 67: 556-582.
1069 Reichenbacher BA, Uhlig U, Kowalke T, Bassler B, Matzke-Karasz Schenk B. 2004. Biota, paleoenvironments and biostratigraphy of continental Oligocene deposits of the South German Molasse Basin (Penzberg syncline). *Palaeontology* 47(3): 639–677.

1072 Riveline J. 1986. Les charophytes du Paléogène et du Miocène inférieur d'Europe occidentale. *Cahiers de Paléontologie*, volume 8). Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. 304 pp.

1074 Riveline J, Berger J.-P, Feist M, Martin-closas C, Schudack M, Soulié-Märsche I. 1996. *European Mesozoic-Cenozoic charophyte biozonation. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 167(3): 453–468.

1077 Roduit N. 2007. JMicroVision: un logiciel d'analyse d'images pétrographiques polyvalent. PhD thesis, University of Geneva, 128 p.

1079 Roman F. 1903. Contributions à l'étude des Bassins lacustres de l'Éocène et de l'Oligocène du Languedoc. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (4ème série)* 3: 546-616.

1081 Roman F. 1910. Faune saumâtre du sannoisien du Gard. *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (4ème série)* 10: 927-955.

1083 Rouchy J-M. 1997. Paleogene continental rift system of Western Europe: locations of basins, paleogeographic and structural framework, and the distribution of evaporites. In: Busson, G., Schreiber, B.C. eds., Sedimentary Deposition in Rift and Foreland Basins in France and Spain. Columbia Univ. Press, New York: pp. 45-94.

1087 Rouchy J-M, Blanc-Valleron M-M. 2009. Les évaporites matériaux singuliers, milieux extrêmes. Vuibert, Paris: 184 pp.

1089 Sanchis E, Séranne M. 2000. Structural style and tectonic evolution of a polyphase extensional basin of the Gulf of Lion passive margin: the Tertiary Alès Basin, southern France. *Tectonophysics* 322: 243-264.
1092 Sandberg PA. 1975. New interpretations of Great Salt Lake ooids and of ancient non-skeletal carbonate mineralogy. *Sedimentology* 22: 497-537.

1094 Sandberg PA. 1980. The Pliocene Glenns Ferry oolite: lake-margin carbonate deposition in the southwestern Snake River plain—Discussion and replay. *Journal of Sedimentary Petrology* 50: 997-998.

1097 Séranne M, Benedicto A, Truffert C, Pascal G, Labaume P. 1995. Structural style and evolution of the Gulf of Lion Oligo-Miocene rifting: Role of the Pyrenean orogeny. *Marine and Petroleum Geology* 12: 809-820.

1100 Séranne M, Couëffé R, Husson E, Baral C, Villard J. 2021. The transition from Pyrenean shortening to Gulf of Lion rifting in Languedoc (South France) -A tectonic-sedimentation analysis. *BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin* 192, 27.

1103 Shekhar R, Sahni I, Benson G, Agar S, Amour F, Tomas S, Christ N, Always R, Mutti M, Immenhauser A, Karcz Z, Kabiri L. 2014. Modelling and simulation of a Jurassic carbonate ramp outcrop, Amellago, High Atlas Mountains, Morocco. *Petroleum Geoscience* 20, 109-124.

1106 Sissingh W. 2001. Tectonostratigraphy of the West Alpine Foreland: correlation of Tertiary sedimentary sequences, changes in eustatic sea-level and stress regimes. *Tectonophysics*: 333, 361-400.

1109 Schäfer A, Stapf, KRG. 1978. Permian Saar-Nahe Basin and recent Lake Constance (Germany): two environments of lacustrine algal carbonates. In: A. Matter and M.E. Tucker (Eds), Modern and Ancient Lake Sediments. IAS Special Publication, 2, 83-107.

1112 Swirydczuk K, Wilkinson BH. 1979. The Pliocene Glenns Ferry oolite: lake-margin carbonate deposition in the southwestern Snake River plain. *Journal of Sedimentary Petrology* 49: 995-1004.
1115 Swirydczuk K, Wilkinson BH, Smith GR. 1980. The Pliocene Glenns Ferry oolite—II: Sedimentology of oolitic lacustrine terrace deposits. *Journal of Sedimentary Petrology* 50: 1237–1248.

1118 Tabb DC, Moore DR. 1971. Discovery of the Carolina Clam, Polymesoda caroliniana (Bosc), a supposed Florida disjunct species, in Everglades National Park, Florida. *Gulf Research Reports* 3(2): 265–281.

1121 Talbot MR. 1990. A review of the palaeohydrological interpretation of carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios in primary lacustrine carbonates. *Chemical Geology* 80: 261–279.

1123 Talbot MR, Allen PA, 1996. Lakes. In: Reading, H.G. ed., *Sedimentary Environments: Processes*. Facies and Stratigraphy. Blackwell Science, Oxford: pp. 83–124.

1125 Tänavsuu-Milkeviciene K, Sarg JF, Bartov Y. 2017. Depositional Cycles and Sequences in an Organic-Rich Lake Basin: Eocene Green River Formation, Lake Uinta, Colorado and Utah, U.S.A. *Journal of Sedimentary Research* 87(3): 210–229.

1128 Triat JM, Truc G. 1974. Evaporites paléogènes du domaine rhodanien. *Revue de Géographie Physique et de Géologie Dynamique* 16: 235–262.

1130 Truc G. 1978. Lacustrine Sedimentation in an Evaporitic Environment: The Ludian (Palaeogene) of the Mormoiron Basin, Southeastern France. *Special Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists* 2: 189–203.

1133 Valette M. 1991. Etude structural du gisement salifère Oligocène de Vauvert (Gard), *Thèse de doctorat*, Univ. Montpellier II, 229 pp.

1135 Valette M, Benedicto A. 1995. Chevauchements gravitaires halotectoniques dans le basin distensif de Camargue (marge du golfe du Lion, SE de la France). *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 166(2): 137–147.
1138 Veizer J, Ala D, Azmy K, Bruckschen P, Buhl D, Bruhn F, Carden G, Diener A, Ebneth S, Godderis Y, Jasper T, Korte C, Pawellek F, Podlaha O, Strauss H. 1999. ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr, δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater. *Chemical Geology* 161 (1–3): 59–88.

1141 Velasco J, Millán A, Hernández J, Hernández J, Gutiérrez C, Abellán P, Sánchez D, Ruiz M. 2006. Response of biotic communities to salinity changes in a Mediterranean hypersaline stream. *Aquat. Biosyst.* 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-2-12

1144 Van Den Berg MS, Coops H, Simons J, De Keizer A. 1998 – Competition between *Chara aspera* and *Potamogeton pectinatus* as a function of temperature and light. *Aquatic botany* 60: 241-250.

1147 Wanless HR. 1981. Fining-upward sedimentary sequences generated in seagrass beds. *Journal of Sedimentary Petrology* 51: 445-454.

1149
1150 Wattine A, Vennin E, De Wever P, 2003. Evolution d'un environnement carbonaté lacustre à stromatolithes, par l'approche paleo-écologique (Carrière de Montaigu-le-Blin, bassin de Limagne, Allier, France). *Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France* 174 (3): 243-260.

1153 Williamson CR, Picard M.D. 1974. Petrology of carbonate rocks of the Green River Formation (Eocene). *Journal of Sedimentary Petrology* 44(3):738-759.

1155 Ziegler PA. 1992. European Cenozoic rift system. In: Ziegler, P.A. (Ed.), Geodynamics of Rifting, Volume I, Case History Studies on Rifts: Europe and Asia. *Tectonophysics* 208: 91–111.

1158
1159

1160
1161 **Figure captions**

1162 **Figure 1:** A) Simplified structural map of Languedoc and southern Rhône valley (SE France) (after Séranne et al., 2021; Mauffret and Gorini, 1996): the grey shaded areas indicate late Eocene to Aquitanian deposits (after Séranne et al., 1995; Séranne et al., 2021) and the background map displays the Bouguer anomaly (after Arthaud et al., 1980). B) Geological map of the Comps and Butte Iouton area, modified from the BRGM geological map, Nîmes sheet 1/50000 (Ménillet, 1973): the map shows the Eocene to Miocene outcrops and the Cretaceous substratum of the Jonquières high. C) Detailed geological map displaying the close-up view of the box around the butte Iouton hill in B).

1170 **Figure 2:** Detailed sedimentary log of the butte Iouton succession and main molluscan taxa identified on field. Most of the section is measured on the quarry (see location in Fig. 1C). See text for the definition of lithofacies and sedimentary cycles.

1173 **Figure 3:** Field photographs from the Butte Iouton quarry. A) Stratal succession from U1 to U3 cycles showing the thick and horizontally layered oolitic-peloidal grainstone beds. B) Close view on stratal succession from U1 and U2 cycles C) Erosional contact between Priabonian lacustrine oolitic grainstones and overlying Burdigalian bioclastic limestone.es. Priabonian limestone clasts are reworked within the Burdigalian deposits (black arrows).

1178 **Figure 4:** Charophyte gyrogonites and key gastropods and bivalves from the butte Iouton limestones. A-B: SEM photographs of characean gyrogonites from the lowermost characean-rich microbial laminites. A: *Gyrogona caelata* (Reid and Groves, 1921), lateral view. B: *Gyrogona* aff. *lemani capitata* (Grambast and Grambast-Fessard, 1981) lateral view. C-K: Common molluscan taxa. C) *Lymnea Ioutensis* (Roman, 1910). D) *Planorbis stenocyclotus* (Fontannes, 1884). E) *Brotia Albigensis* (Noulet, 1854). F) *Tarebia barjacensis* (Fontannes, 1884). G) *Melanopsis acrolepta* (Fontannes, 1884). H) *Hydrobia celasensis* (Fontannes, 1884).
1185 I) *Assiminea nicolasi* (Roman, 1910). J) *Nystia plicata* (d'Archiac & Verneuil, 1855). K)
1186 *Polymesoda dumasi* (M. de Serres, 1827). Scale bar is 5 mm.

1187

1188 **Figure 5:** Microstructure of ooids. A) Thin-section microphotograph under polarized-light
1189 microscopy showing the variably preserved radiaxial microstructure within the cortex and the
1190 occurrence of micritized areas (arrows). The inner part of the ooid is pervasively micritized and
1191 the nucleus consists of a quartz grain. B) Detail of the radiaxial microstructure of ooid cortex
1192 under reflected-light microscopy. C) SEM photograph of a thin-sectioned micritized ooid
1193 showing the euhedral to subhedral micrite probably replacing the initially radiaxal
1194 microstructure and the presence of significant inter-crystalline microporosity. D) Close-up on
1195 the outer cortex of a micritized ooid under SEM showing microrhombic calcite overgrowths
1196 (arrow).

1197

1198 **Figure 6:** Oolitic-peloidal and peloidal grainstones facies (F1). A-B-E-F-G) Thin section
1199 microphotographs under plane polarized light; C-D: Field photographs. A) Oolitic-peloidal
1200 grainstone (Facies F1A) showing a mixture of ooids (white arrow) and peloids (grey arrow).
1201 Note the bimodal distribution of grains: the medium-sized grains include superficial, radiaxial
1202 and strongly micritized ooids while the peloids are the finer (around 0.1 – 0.2 mm size) and
1203 structureless grains. The nuclei of the ooids are essentially made of peloids. B) Well-sorted
1204 oolitic-peloidal grainstone displays abundant radiaxial ooids (white arrow) and few peloids
1205 (grey arrow). The nuclei of the ooids consist of quartz grains or bioclasts. Note the high amount
1206 of intergranular porosity and the almost lack of compaction features. C) Field photograph of
1207 the southern face of the quarry showing a massive bed of oolitic peloidal grainstones with
1208 decimetre-thick, gravelly fossiliferous lenses. Cross-stratifications are seldom visible (see Fig.
1209 6D). D) Close-up view of sub-planar cross-stratification from the oolitic-peloidal grainstones
1210 indicated by the dotted lines. The cross-beddings heights range between 10 and 50 cm. E)
1211 Peloidal grainstones with scattered molluscs (F1B facies) displaying slightly elongated peloids,
1212 micritized molluscan shells (mainly gastropods: Gast.) and few aggregate grains (Agg.). F)
1213 Oncoidal-ooidal rich peloidal grainstones (F1C facies) are poorly sorted sands consisting of a
1214 mixture of peloids and coarse grains (coated grains and molluscans). Note the strong
1215 micritization of the molluscan shells (Moll.). G) F1C facies displays bimodal distribution made
1216 of millimetric coated grains (ooids and/or oncoids) floating in a peloidal sand matrix: F1C facies
1217 occurs generally within few centimetres thick lenses.

1218

1219 **Figure 7:** Mud-dominated facies F2. A) Molluscan-rich peloidal packstones (F2A facies) The
1220 thin section shows dissolution of a gastropod and the abundance of microspar cement (PPL:
1221 plane polarized). B) Hand sample image showing the accumulation of molluscs in the facies
1222 F2A. The molluscan assemblage is dominated by *Polymesoda sp.* (*Pol.*) and small hydrobids
1223 (white arrow). C) Outcrop photograph showing the decimetre thick tabular beds of the mud-
1224 dominated facies (F2). D) Thin section of the facies F2A exhibits a mould after *Polymesoda sp.*
1225 (*Pol.*) in the upper quarters of the picture and small gastropod moulds (*Gast.*) in the lower left
1226 and right-hand quarters and abundant microspar cementation (PPL). E) Thin section of
1227 Characean-rich peloidal wackestone to packstone (F2B facies) displaying abundant characean
1228 cortical cells and stems (*Char.*) and ostracods (*Ostr.*). The matrix is made of densely packed
1229 peloids. F) Peloidal wackestone to packstones with reworked calcitic rafts (*cr*) (F2C facies). G)
1230 Thin section (under PPL) of the facies F2D showing abundant ostracods (*Ostr.*), molds of
1231 gastropods (*Gast.*) and (reworked?) ooids (*Oo.*). The micrite is inhomogeneous suggesting
1232 burrowing and bioturbation. H) Hand sample image displaying molluscan-rich ostracod
1233 wackestone (F2D facies): the molluscan shells are preserved as moulds. The assemblage is
1234 dominated by gastropods (*Gast.*.) and by the bivalve *Polymesoda* (*Pol.*).

1235 **Figure 8:** Planar-laminated bindstones (F3 facies) and pedogenic carbonate breccia (F4 facies).
1236 A) Field photograph of the southern face of the quarry displaying the vertical evolution from
1237 the oolitic peloidal grainstones (lower white double arrow) to the brecciated interval (dark
double arrow). The red thick dashed line indicates a subaerial exposure surface, and the yellow
1238 interval indicates few centimetres-thick oolitic grainstone. The laminated bindstones occur in
1239 the upper part of the picture (see Fig. 8B and 8C). B) Close-up view of the planar-laminated
1240 bindstone. Infra-centimetric pores are moulds after *Melanopsis* gastropod dissolution. C) Thin
1241 section under plane polarized light of F3 facies displaying alternations of dark (micrite) and
1242 light (accumulation of characean cortical cells fragments and calcite microspar) crinkled to
1243 wavy laminae, with characean gyrogonite (*gyr.*). D-E) Microphotographs under plane polarized
1244 light of brecciated limestones. D) Thin section showing vertical and curved cracks (root trace:
1245 rt) filled with calcite. White box indicates a dissolution vug filled with calcitic pseudomorphs
1246 after gypsum. E) Close-up view of the box in B) showing relicts of the tabular to microlenticular
1247 gypsum and the replacing calcitic micrite to microspar. F) Thin section showing the
1248 intrasediment growth of gypsum within the oolitic-peloidal grainstone. The similarity in
1249 petrographic characters with the underlying F1B facies (see Fig. 8A) and the grain contact
1250 points to post-depositional gypsum growth after lake evaporation. The Alizarine Red staining
1251 in red colors indicates calcite mineralogy (plane polarized light). G) close-up view showing
1252 calcite pseudomorphs after gypsum that occupy the inter-ooidal space.
1253

1254 **Figure 9:** Composite log of the butte Iouton succession compiling the depositional textures, the
1255 lithofacies stacking pattern, the interpreted transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles, carbonate
1256 grain composition of limestones after point-counting on thin-sections, the relative abundance
1257 of selected preserved biota, δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C vertical changes and estimated salinity domains.
1258 See Figure 2 for detailed legend.

1259 **Figure 10:** Carbone and oxygen stable isotopes results. A) δ¹⁸O – δ¹³C cross-plot for all samples (n = 58): the labels refer to the lithofacies (see text for further detail). The Priabonian marine box (Veizer et al., 1999), isotope signatures of lacustrines carbonates from the Issirac basin (Lettéron et al., 2017) as well as interpretations of factors controlling δ¹⁸O – δ¹³C trends are reported. B-C-D) δ¹⁸O – δ¹³C cross-plot for cycles U1 (B), U2 (C), U3 (D) and U4-U5 (E) with samples labelled as a function of lithofacies. Isotope values are expressed in per mil (%) and are relative to V-PDB.

1266 **Figure 11:** Depositional model for the late Priabonian saline lake margin from butte Iouton.

1267 **Figure 12:** Palaeogeographical reconstruction of saline lakes from Languedoc and southern Rhône valley during the late Priabonian. The siliciclastic fluxes are compiled from the previous studies: Lettéron et al. (2022) for the Célas sandstones from Sommières and ASCI systems, and Cavelier et al. (1984) for the plausible late Eocene to early Oligocene siliciclastic infill of the Vistrenque basin.

1272

1273 **Table caption**

1274 **Table 1:** Facies classification of the Butte Iouton limestones: biological contents, sedimentary and diagenetic features, and their paleoenvironmental interpretations.

1276 **Table 2:** Carbon and Oxygen isotope ratio, diagenetic features and lithofacies of measured samples.

1278
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>Figure 01</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 02</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Figure 03</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 04</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>Figure 05</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Figure 06</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>Figure 07</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>Figure 08</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>Figure 09</caption><thead><tr><th>ELEVATION (m)</th><th>AGE</th><th>TEXTURAL LOG</th><th>PRIABONIAN LITHOFACIES</th><th>T-R CYCLES<br>REGRESSION<br>TRANSGRESSION</th><th>GRAIN COMPOSITION</th><th>BIOTA</th><th>STABLE ISOTOPES</th><th>SALINITY</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>55</td><td rowspan="2">BURD-GALIAN</td><td rowspan="2">Red algal limestones</td><td rowspan="2">F4 F3 F2 D C B A C B A</td><td rowspan="2">U5</td><td rowspan="2">Ooids<br>Oncoids<br>& coarse ooids<br>Peloids<br>Aggregate grains<br>Molluscan shells<br>Ostracods<br>Characeans<br>Other grains</td><td rowspan="2">Bivalves<br>Gastr podods<br>Ostracods<br>Charophytes</td><td rowspan="2">δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)<br>δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)</td><td rowspan="2">Fresh-water<br>Oligohaline<br>Mesohaline<br>Polyhaline<br>Euhaline<br>Hyperhaline</td></tr><tr><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>45</td><td rowspan="2">LATE PRIABONIAN</td><td rowspan="2">Red and yellow clays and siltstones</td><td rowspan="2">F4 F3 F2 D C B A C B A</td><td rowspan="2">U4</td><td rowspan="2">Ooids<br>Oncoids<br>& coarse ooids<br>Peloids<br>Aggregate grains<br>Molluscan shells<br>Ostracods<br>Characeans<br>Other grains</td><td rowspan="2">Bivalves<br>Gastr podods<br>Ostracods<br>Charophytes</td><td rowspan="2">δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)<br>δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)</td><td rowspan="2">Fresh-water<br>Oligohaline<br>Mesohaline<br>Polyhaline<br>Euhaline<br>Hyperhaline</td></tr><tr><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td rowspan="2">EARLY EOCENE?</td><td rowspan="2">Red and yellow clays and siltstones</td><td rowspan="2">F4 F3 F2 D C B A C B A</td><td rowspan="2">U3</td><td rowspan="2">Ooids<br>Oncoids<br>& coarse ooids<br>Peloids<br>Aggregate grains<br>Molluscan shells<br>Ostracods<br>Characeans<br>Other grains</td><td rowspan="2">Bivalves<br>Gastr podods<br>Ostracods<br>Charophytes</td><td rowspan="2">δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)<br>δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)</td><td rowspan="2">Fresh-water<br>Oligohaline<br>Mesohaline<br>Polyhaline<br>Euhaline<br>Hyperhaline</td></tr><tr><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td rowspan="2">EARLY EOCENE?</td><td rowspan="2">Red and yellow clays and siltstones</td><td rowspan="2">F4 F3 F2 D C B A C B A</td><td rowspan="2">U2</td><td rowspan="2">Ooids<br>Oncoids<br>& coarse ooids<br>Peloids<br>Aggregate grains<br>Molluscan shells<br>Ostracods<br>Characeans<br>Other grains</td><td rowspan="2">Bivalves<br>Gastr podods<br>Ostracods<br>Charophytes</td><td rowspan="2">δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)<br>δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)</td><td rowspan="2">Fresh-water<br>Oligohaline<br>Mesohaline<br>Polyhaline<br>Euhaline<br>Hyperhaline</td></tr><tr><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td rowspan="2">HAUTERIVIAN</td><td rowspan="2">limestones</td><td rowspan="2">F4 F3 F2 D C B A C B A</td><td rowspan="2">U1</td><td rowspan="2">Ooids<br>Oncoids<br>& coarse ooids<br>Peloids<br>Aggregate grains<br>Molluscan shells<br>Ostracods<br>Characeans<br>Other grains</td><td rowspan="2">Bivalves<br>Gastr podods<br>Ostracods<br>Charophytes</td><td rowspan="2">δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)<br>δ<sup>13</sup>C<sub>VPDB</sub> (‰)</td><td rowspan="2">Fresh-water<br>Oligohaline<br>Mesohaline<br>Polyhaline<br>Euhaline<br>Hyperhaline</td></tr><tr><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>Figure 10</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Figure 11</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>Figure 12</figcaption></figure>
<table><thead><tr><th></th><th>Facies</th><th>Dominant biota</th><th>Sedimentary structures</th><th>Stratal pattern</th><th>Diagenetic features</th><th>Paleoenvironmental interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F1A</td><td>Oolitic-peloidal grainstone</td><td>Gastropods : Melanopsis, Tarebia, Neritina.</td><td>Seldom visible cross-stratifications. Good sorting (unimodal) to bimodal distribution.</td><td>Massive, can form up to 2-3 metres thick units with peloidal rich grainstones (F1B)</td><td>- Micritization of shells and ooids cortices<br>-Intragranular microporosity development<br>- Microrhombic micrite overgrowths<br>-Minor compaction features at grain contact</td><td>Moderate to high energy, shallow, oligo-mesohaline, perennial lake environments, at the vicinity of oolitic shoals.</td></tr><tr><td>F1B</td><td>Peloidal grainstone</td><td>Gastropods : Melanopsis, Tarebia, Neritina.</td><td>Seldom visible cross-stratifications. Bimodal distribution of the grains.</td><td>Massive, can form up to 2-3 metres thick units with oolitic-rich grainstones (F1A)</td><td>- Micritization of shells and ooids cortices<br>--Intragranular microporosity development<br>-Minor compaction features at grain contact</td><td>Moderate energy, shallow, oligo-mesohaline, perennial lake environments, in backshoal setting.</td></tr><tr><td>F1C</td><td>Oncoidal-ooidal-peloidal grainstone</td><td>Scarce gastropods</td><td>Gravel lenses of coarse-sized grains</td><td>Centimetre-thick strata</td><td>- Micritization of shells and ooids cortices<br>-Intragranular microporosity development<br>-Minor compaction features at grain contact</td><td>Moderate to high energy, shallow, oligo-mesohaline, perennial lake environments.</td></tr><tr><td>F2A</td><td>Mollusk-rich peloidal packstone-grainstone</td><td>Bivalves (Polymesoda), gastropods (Hydrobids, Tarebia), ostracods, scarce charophytes</td><td>Structureless</td><td>Few centimetres to decimetre tabular beds</td><td>- Microsparry and sparry calcite cements<br>- dissolution of molluscan shells</td><td>Shallow, oligo-mesohaline lake with low to moderate water energy.</td></tr><tr><td>F2B</td><td>Characean-rich peloidal wackestone-packstone</td><td>Characean gyrogonites and stems, ostracods, mollusks (Polymesoda,</td><td>Structureless</td><td>Centimetre-thick tabular to nearly horizontal beds forming up to 4 m thick set of platelets</td><td>- Dissolution of aragonitic shells<br>-Microsparry to sparry calcite cements in molds</td><td>Shallow, perennial oligo-mesohaline lake with Characean meadows</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1:** Facies classification of the Butte Iouton limestones: biological contents, sedimentary and diagenetic features, and their paleoenvironmental interpretations.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>F2C</td><td>Peloidal wackestone to packstone with calcitic rafts</td><td>Tarebia, hydrobids)<br>Bivalves (Polymesoda), gastropods (Tarebia)</td><td>Structureless</td><td>Decimetre tabular beds</td><td>- Dissolution of aragonitic shells</td><td>Shallow, perennial oligo-mesohaline lake, within or at vicinity of unpreserved macrophyte meadows</td></tr><tr><td>F2D</td><td>Molluscan-ostracodal wackestone</td><td>Ostracods, gastropods (Lymnaea, Viviparus, Planorbis, Tarebia)</td><td>Inhomogeneous micrite, burrowing and bioturbation</td><td>Decimetre tabular beds to metre beds</td><td>- Dissolution of aragonitic shells</td><td>Low energy, shallow freshwater to oligohaline pools and sheltered areas of the lake margin.</td></tr><tr><td>F3</td><td>Planar-laminated bindstone</td><td>Characean gyrogonites and stems, ostracods, gastropods (mainly Melanopsis)</td><td>Alternation of subhorizontal to wavy and crinkled millimeter-thick micritic and microsparitic laminae</td><td>Up to 2 m-thick intervals of massive to platy limestones</td><td>- Dissolution of aragonitic shells<br>-Microsparry to sparry calcite cements in molds</td><td>Low energy, very shallow freshwater to oligohaline lake margin.</td></tr><tr><td>F4</td><td>Carbonate breccia with pseudomorphs after gypsum</td><td>No preserved biota</td><td>Structureless</td><td>Decimetre thick tightly cemented and irregularly bedded limestone. Gradual transition with underlying oolitic grainstone</td><td>- Circumgranular cracks<br>-Dissolution vug and conduits formations<br>- Root traces<br>- Intrasediment growth of microlenticular gypsum<br>- Calcite pseudomorphs after gypsum<br>- Sparry calcite cements</td><td>Paleosoil in evaporitic setting</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table 2: Carbon and Oxygen isotope ratio, signal preservation vs alteration and depositional facies.</caption><thead><tr><th>Height (m)</th><th>δ<sup>13</sup>C<br>(‰ V-PDB)</th><th>δ<sup>18</sup>O<br>(‰ V-PDB)</th><th>Diagenetic features (macroscopic and/or thin-section observations)</th><th>Depositional facies</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>53,8</td><td>-4,01</td><td>-3,68</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>53</td><td>-4,79</td><td>-3,76</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>52,1</td><td>-4,55</td><td>-3,99</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>43,8</td><td>-2,83</td><td>-3,56</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F2D</td></tr><tr><td>43,6</td><td>-2,34</td><td>-3,42</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>43,5</td><td>-1,74</td><td>-1,33</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>42,8</td><td>-1,32</td><td>-1,91</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>41,8</td><td>-1,27</td><td>-2,51</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>41,3</td><td>-1,61</td><td>-2,11</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>40,8</td><td>-2,11</td><td>-3,07</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1C</td></tr><tr><td>40,65</td><td>-2,24</td><td>-2,81</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1C</td></tr><tr><td>40,35</td><td>-0,53</td><td>-3,58</td><td>-</td><td>F3</td></tr><tr><td>38,5</td><td>-1,40</td><td>-3,35</td><td>-</td><td>F3</td></tr><tr><td>37,7</td><td>-1,21</td><td>-3,61</td><td>-</td><td>F3</td></tr><tr><td>37,4</td><td>-1,32</td><td>-3,58</td><td>-</td><td>F3</td></tr><tr><td>37,1</td><td>-1,08</td><td>-2,86</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>36,75</td><td>-1,20</td><td>-3,14</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>36,7</td><td>-0,50</td><td>-2,85</td><td>Primary</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>36,5</td><td>-1,16</td><td>-3,24</td><td>Rare calcite microspar cements</td><td>F2A</td></tr><tr><td>36,3</td><td>-0,90</td><td>-2,78</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>35,9</td><td>-1,24</td><td>-2,79</td><td>Rare calcite microspar cements</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>35,5</td><td>-1,14</td><td>-2,64</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td>-0,78</td><td>-2,80</td><td>Rare calcite microspar cements</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>34,7</td><td>-1,12</td><td>-3,23</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>34,4</td><td>-1,32</td><td>-2,80</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>34</td><td>-1,08</td><td>-2,79</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>33,7</td><td>-0,88</td><td>-2,95</td><td>-</td><td>F2B</td></tr><tr><td>33,2</td><td>-1,07</td><td>-2,81</td><td>-</td><td>F2C</td></tr><tr><td>32,8</td><td>-1,59</td><td>-3,38</td><td>-</td><td>F2C</td></tr><tr><td>32,3</td><td>-1,15</td><td>-3,07</td><td>-</td><td>F2C</td></tr><tr><td>31,9</td><td>-0,43</td><td>-2,88</td><td>-</td><td>F2D</td></tr><tr><td>31,5</td><td>-1,37</td><td>-2,70</td><td>-</td><td>F2C</td></tr><tr><td>31,2</td><td>-2,09</td><td>-3,66</td><td>Microspar cements</td><td>F2A</td></tr><tr><td>31</td><td>-1,57</td><td>-3,35</td><td>Microspar cements</td><td>F2A</td></tr><tr><td>30,75</td><td>-1,17</td><td>-2,45</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1C</td></tr><tr><td>30,7</td><td>-2,07</td><td>-2,95</td><td>Microspar cements</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>30,55</td><td>-2,29</td><td>-3,30</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>30,45</td><td>-2,22</td><td>-3,06</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>-0,92</td><td>-1,86</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>29,3</td><td>-1,04</td><td>-1,99</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>-1,62</td><td>-2,54</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>28,3</td><td>-1,24</td><td>-2,63</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><tr><td>27,9</td><td>-0,86</td><td>-2,39</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>27,5</td><td>-0,83</td><td>-2,82</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>26,95</td><td>-0,76</td><td>-3,35</td><td>-</td><td>F3</td></tr><tr><td>26,75</td><td>-2,21</td><td>-3,02</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>26,6</td><td>-1,60</td><td>-2,50</td><td>-</td><td>F2D</td></tr><tr><td>26,3</td><td>-2,83</td><td>-2,08</td><td>Pedogenic features/ sparry calcite cements</td><td>F4</td></tr><tr><td>26,2</td><td>-5,21</td><td>-2,28</td><td>Pedogenic features/ sparry calcite cements</td><td>F4</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td>-4,57</td><td>-3,23</td><td>Pedogenic features/ sparry calcite cements</td><td>F4</td></tr><tr><td>25,75</td><td>-2,54</td><td>-2,74</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>25,5</td><td>-1,58</td><td>-2,02</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>24,6</td><td>-1,52</td><td>-2,28</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>24,35</td><td>-1,40</td><td>-2,13</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>24,2</td><td>-1,84</td><td>-2,42</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1A</td></tr><tr><td>23,8</td><td>-1,73</td><td>-2,52</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>23,5</td><td>-2,15</td><td>-2,59</td><td>Grain micritization/ microporosity</td><td>F1B</td></tr><tr><td>23,1</td><td>-1,70</td><td>-2,87</td><td>-</td><td>F2D</td></tr></table>