# Quantitative analysis of the formation of monodisperse cello-oligomers obtained by phosphoric acid hydrolysis

Noriyuki Isobe, Yuko Ono, Yoshiharu Nishiyama, Denis Roux, Akira Isogai

► To cite this version:

Noriyuki Isobe, Yuko Ono, Yoshiharu Nishiyama, Denis Roux, Akira Isogai. Quantitative analysis of the formation of monodisperse cello-oligomers obtained by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose, 2023, 30, pp.8235-8243. 10.1007/s10570-023-05415-1. hal-04177453

HAL Id: hal-04177453

https://hal.science/hal-04177453

Submitted on 4 Aug 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Quantitative analysis of the formation of monodisperse cello-oligomers obtained by phosphoric acid hydrolysis

Noriyuki Isobe* · Yuko Ono · Yoshiharu Nishiyama* · Denis Roux* · Akira Isogai*

Received: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023
© The Author(s) 2023

**Abstract** Hydrolysis of cellulose in concentrated phosphoric acid is known to give two distinctive mono-disperse cello-oligomers: the degree of polymerization (DP) of 7 and 15. To understand the formation mechanism of monodisperse cello-oligomers, the transition of DP during phosphoric hydrolysis was monitored by size-exclusion chromatography combined with multiangle laser-light scattering analyses (SEC/MALLS). The obtained results suggested that

not the hydrolysis at a specific length but random hydrolysis was likely. The rate of hydrolysis slowed down when the DP reached around 40, and the pool of cello-oligomers appeared at the incubation of 35 days. Then, the mono-disperse cello-oligomers were recovered from the pool of cello-oligomers by fractionation based on the solubility difference.

**Keywords** Cellulose oligomers · Phosphoric acid hydrolysis · SEC-MALLS

**Supplementary Information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05415-1.

N. Isobe
Research Institute for Marine Resources Utilization (MRU), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, 237-0061 Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan

N. Isobe (✉) · Y. Ono · A. Isogai
Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
e-mail: isoben@jamstec.go.jp

Y. Nishiyama
Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolécules Végétales (CERMAV), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France

D. Roux
Laboratoire Rhéologie et Procédés, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CNRS (UMR 5520), Domaine Universitaire, BP 53, Grenoble, France

## Introduction

Oligosaccharides are an important class of biomaterials with a wide range of applications. Biologically, oligosaccharides serve as recognition or adhesion sites on living cells and are considered to have biological activities and potential therapeutic effects (Muanprasat and Chatsudthipong 2017). In addition, oligosaccharides have been used as a model compound for polysaccharides: the single crystals of cello- or chito-oligomers give the essential information of cellulose and chitin crystal structures (Buleon and Chanzy 1978; Cartier et al. 1990; Persson et al. 1992; Helbert and Sugiyama 1998). In particular, Chanzy and co-workers clearly showed the chain orientation within the crystals based on the electron micrographs and electron diffraction diagrams on the single crystals made of cellulose, chitin, and chitosan oligomers (Buleon and Chanzy 1978; Cartier
et al. 1990; Persson et al. 1992; Helbert and Sugiyama 1998). Moreover, oligosaccharides are the building block for designable materials. Maltoheptaose (amylo-oligomer) serves as the hydrophilic domain in block copolymer that self-assembles into a highly ordered structure with periodicity on the nanometer scale (Cushen et al. 2012). Cello-oligomers can form nanoribbon structurse, the surface functional groups of which are modifiable (Yataka et al. 2015; Serizawa et al. 2017).

In general, oligosaccharide preparation is classified into three paths: (i) chemical synthesis (Seegerberger 2008; Oscarson and Cheallaigh 2021; Fittolani et al. 2022), (ii) enzymatic synthesis with glycosyl transferases or glycosidases (Perugino et al. 2004; Hiraishi et al. 2009; Hata et al. 2018), and (iii) scission of polysaccharides (Isogai and Usuda 1991; Meiland et al. 2011). While chemical and enzymatic synthesis can achieve desirable and complicatedly branched oligosaccharides, a simple short-chain and non-branched oligosaccharide can be prepared by scission of polysaccharides. As such, acid hydrolysis was well established. Specifically, phosphoric acid hydrolysis is known for its unique nature: it gives two distinctive lengths of cello- (and chito-) oligomers, degree of polymerization (DP) of 7 and 15 (Isogai and Usuda 1991; Helbert and Sugiyama 1998; Zhang et al. 2021). Briefly, cellulose is dissolved in 83 wt% phosphoric acid and the solution is incubated at room temperature for more than 4 weeks. Then, by diluting the solution with water, precipitation takes place. The precipitates contain cello-oligomer of DP 15 and the supernatant contains DP 7 that is recovered by the subsequent addition of methanol. Despite the simple and environmentally-benign aqueous process, the time-course reaction is a mystery, and therefore the mechanism behind the formation of DP 7 and 15 remains unclear, leading to the unsuccessful preparation of mono-disperse cello-oligomers (Meiland et al. 2011). To mitigate this, it is crucial to understand how DP changes in the course of the reaction.

For this aim, size-exclusion chromatography combined with multiangle laser-light scattering analyses (SEC/MALLS) is suitable. SEC/MALLS is the technique that combines the fractionation of solute molecules by chromatography and the measurement of absolute molecular mass by multiangle light scattering. One of the great advantages of SEC/MALLS is the quantitative nature. By using the accurate

refractive index increment (dn/dc), the mass calculated from the integration of SEC elution curves corresponds to the injected mass (Ono et al. 2016). In addition, the absolute molar mass is given to each slice of SEC elution curves by MALLS. Consequently, the absolute molar mass can be given to all the injected molecules, as long as all the injected molecules are completely dissolved in the eluent; this is the case for the easy-dissolving cello-oligomers.

Here, the time-course change in DP during phosphoric acid hydrolysis was monitored in a quantitative manner: By multiplying the yield of phosphoric acid hydrolysis to the SEC elution curves, one can discuss which and how much fraction appears and disappears in the course of incubation. Through the transition of DPs, the mechanism behind the formation of mono-disperse cello-oligomer obtained by phosphoric acid hydrolysis was speculated.

## Materials and methods

### Materials

Microcrystalline cellulose powder (Funacell, Funa-koshi, Japan) was used as a starting cellulose. Phosphoric acid, methanol, and acetone (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical, Japan) were used without further purification. Deuterated DMAc (DMAc-d9) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Massachusetts, USA). Deionized water was used in this study.

### Phosphoric acid hydrolysis

Phosphoric acid hydrolysis was performed according to Isogai and Usuda (1991). Cellulose powder (22.25 g) was added in 683.46 g of 85% H₃PO₄ and 16.0 g of water and incubated at room temperature. To facilitate the dissolution, the undissolved portion of cellulose was smashed with a glass rod. The solution became completely transparent 2 days after the start of incubation. At 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days from the start of incubation, 102 g of solution was taken. The half portion (51 g) was poured into 500 mL of water, leading to the precipitation. The precipitation was washed with water by centrifugation until it showed neutrality, and then washed with acetone to the remove brownish color. This insoluble
fraction was denoted as "Fraction A". The superna-
tant was poured into 1 L of methanol, and the precipi-
tation was recovered by centrifugation and washed
with water until it showed neutrality. This soluble
fraction was denoted as "Fraction B". In addition,
the other portion (51 g) was poured into 500 mL of
methanol, leading to precipitation. The precipita-
tion was washed with water by centrifugation until it
showed neutrality, and then washed with acetone to
remove the brownish color. This insoluble fraction
was denoted as "Fraction all".

SEC-MALLS

The SEC/MALLS analysis system comprising SEC
columns (KD-806 M and KD-802, Shodex, Japan), a
MALLS detector (DAWN HELEOS-II, λ=658 nm,
Wyatt Technologies, USA), and 1.0% w/v LiCl/
DMAc was used as an eluent. Other SEC attachments
and the operation conditions are described elsewhere
(Ono et al. 2016).

NMR

The ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded at 23 °C using a JMN-ECA II 500 spectrometer (JEOL, Japan). Deuterated DMAc (0.525 ml) was added to 0.075mL of 8% LiCl/DMAc with cello-oligomer concentration of 0.291 mg/ml.

**Results and discussion**

Characterization of mono-disperse cello-oligomers

Phosphoric acid hydrolysis of micro-crystalline cel-
lulose powder was conducted according to Isogai
and Usuda (Fig. 1a) (Isogai and Usuda 1991), where
Fraction A and B after 6 weeks of incubation were
reported to have weight-average DP (DPw) 15 and
7, respectively. Other than the monodisperse cello-
oligomers, un-fractioned acid hydrolyzed products
"Fraction all" were recovered by the addition of meth-
anol into cellulose/phosphoric acid solution in order
to examine if the additional hydrolysis took place
upon the dilution with water ("Addition of water" in
Fig. 1a). The yields of Fraction all decreased mono-
tonically (Fig. 1b), indicating that a certain amount
(up to 350 mg per 1 g input of cellulose) became
water-soluble in the form of water-soluble cello-oli-
gomers (DP: less than 6)(Taylor 1957) or furfurals,
and was washed away during the washing step. While
the yield of Fraction A decreased, that of B increased
and reached a plateau.

To confirm that the hydrolyzed products were
cello-oligomers, ¹³C NMR was performed (Fig. 2).
The spectra of both Fraction A and B were in
accordance with that of reported cello-oligomers
(Isogai 1997). Although the existence of a small
amount of phosphorous (around 0.13 at% at a
maximum) in the form of phosphate was reported

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** a Preparative scheme of cello-oligomers, b yields of Fraction A, B, and all, which were obtained by dividing the mass of each fraction (Fraction A, B, and all in a) with the initial input of starting cellulose powder (22.3 g)</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** ¹³C NMR spectra of (a) Fraction A and (b) B recovered at 35 days of incubation. Asterisks show epimer at the C1 of reducing end</figcaption></figure>

(Jiang et al. 2021), ¹³C NMR did not detect any phosphate-related signals. By the ratio of the area of two peaks, namely C1 participating in β-1,4 glucosyl bond and C1 at the reducing end, the number average DPs was calculated: 11.2 for Fraction A and 5.1 for Fraction B, which were in accordance with the reported DPs, 15 and 7. Therefore, the hydrolyzed cellulose obtained by phosphoric acid was purely cello-oligomers as reported.

To monitor the transition of DPs, SEC/MALLS was performed on Fraction A and B (Fig. 3; Table 1.). At 7 days of incubation, the molar mass distribution of Fraction A (Fig. 3a) was broad (dispersity, *D*: 1.6) and centered at around 5000–6000, namely DP 30–40 (DPw: 37). As the incubation time proceeded, the distribution became narrower (*D* changed from 1.6 to 1.2), and the peak center shifted to molar mass of 2000–3000, namely DP 12–18 (DPw: 15.4). In contrast, the molar mass distribution of Fraction B (Fig. 3b) was sharp from the first appearance at 14 days incubation (*D*: 1.3), and the peak center did not change (DPw: 8). The constantly mono-disperse nature of Fraction B (DPw: 8) should arise from the water solubility of cello-oligomers with the DP less than 6 (Taylor 1957) that were washed away during the washing step (Jiang et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021). As a result, the origin of mono-disperse nature of DP 15 (Fraction A) needs to be addressed.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** SEC/MALLS elution patterns of (a) Fraction A and (b) B. Incubation periods are shown in the figures. Normalized concentration (mg/mL/1 g input) was the concentration normalized by the yields as detailed in Supporting Information so as to visualize the transition of DPs and yields of each fraction. Molar mass at each elution volume is also shown on top of figures for clarity</figcaption></figure>

*Effect of addition of water on the oligomer formation*

One possible explanation for the formation of mono-disperse nature of DP15 is the hydrolysis at a specific length during the precipitating step; namely, the highly crystalline aggregates of cello-oligomers are formed during the precipitating step (“Addition of water” in Fig. 1a) and the edge of crystals is susceptible to the further hydrolysis induced by the additional water. Indeed, the yield of Fraction A+B did not correspond to Fraction all in Fig. 1b, indicating that the addition of water in the precipitation step caused the additional hydrolysis, leading to the formation of
<caption>**Table 1** The yields, weight-average DP (DPw), and dispersity (D = DPw/ DPn) of each fraction</caption>

Yields of Fraction A and B were obtained by dividing the mass of each fraction with the initial input of starting cellulose powder (22.3 g)

<table><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Time (day)</th><th colspan="3">Fraction A</th><th colspan="3">Fraction B</th></tr><tr><th>Yield (mg/1 g input)</th><th>DP</th><th>D</th><th>Yield (mg/1 g input)</th><th>DP</th><th>D</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>7</td><td>843.4</td><td>37.7</td><td>1.6</td><td>2.8</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>778.2</td><td>22.8</td><td>1.3</td><td>32.4</td><td>8.0</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>626.5</td><td>20.4</td><td>1.3</td><td>61.8</td><td>8.6</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>535.7</td><td>17.3</td><td>1.2</td><td>86.7</td><td>8.0</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td>307.6</td><td>16.7</td><td>1.2</td><td>107.5</td><td>8.0</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>42</td><td>324.9</td><td>15.4</td><td>1.2</td><td>110.3</td><td>8.0</td><td>1.1</td></tr></tbody></table>

additional water-soluble cello-oligomers that were lost during the subsequent washing step. To examine the possibility of specific hydrolysis during precipitating step, the SEC-MALLS elution profiles of Fractions all, A, and B were compared in Fig. 4. Owing to the above-mentioned quantitative nature of SEC-MALLS, one can add the elution profiles of Fractions A and B, and compare it with Fraction all. Both at 14 and 42 days of incubation period, the peak position and the shape of elution profiles were largely identical between Fractions all and A+B, showing that the random hydrolysis took place at the precipitating step.

### Scission probability

Another possible explanation of the mono-disperse nature of DP15 (Fraction A) is the hydrolysis at a specific length. To examine this, the analysis of Fraction all that contains all hydrolyzed products other than water soluble cello-oligomers is beneficial. If the specific hydrolysis takes place, DP15 will appear from the beginning of hydrolysis. As seen in Fig. 5a, the elution patterns of Fraction all were broad and contained several species. To deconvolute these patterns including overlapping distributions, the second derivatives are powerful (Fig. 5b) (Talsky et al. 1978). In the second derivatives, the peak position appears as a downward concave as indicated with arrows in Fig. 5b. In the starting cellulose, there were two downward concaves centered at 14.8 mL (Species 1) and 16.0 mL (Species 2), with corresponding DPs of 170 and 30, respectively. As the incubation proceeded from 7 to 28 days, the two concaves of Species 1 and 2 gradually shifted to larger elution volume and another downward concave centered at 17.0 mL (Species

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** SEC/MALLS elution patterns of “Fraction all”, “Fraction A+B”, “Fraction A”, and “Fraction B” at incubation periods of (a) 14 days and (b) 42 days. Normalized concentration (mg/mL/1 g input) was the concentration normalized by the yields as detailed in Supporting Information so as to visualize the transition of DPs and yields of each fraction. Molar mass at each elution volume is also shown on top of figures for clarity</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5** a SEC/MALLS elution patterns of “Fraction all”. Incubation periods are shown in the figures. Normalized concentration (mg/mL/1 g input) was the concentration normalized by the yields as detailed in Supporting Information so as to visualize the transition of DPs and yields of each fraction. Molar mass at each elution volume is also shown on top of figures for clarity. **b** the second derivatives of Fig. 4a. Arrows correspond to the observed peaks that are denoted as Species 1 (red), 2 (green), and 3 (blue) in the ascending order of elution volume</figcaption></figure>

3; corresponding DP: 6) gradually appeared. At 35 days of incubation, Species 1 disappeared or merged into Species 2 centered at 16.4 (corresponding DP: 14). The gradual shift of Species 1 and 2 toward lower molar mass supports not the hydrolysis at a specific length but the random hydrolysis. It should be noted that, as mentioned above, Species 3 was a simple byproduct given by the washing step, where the water-soluble cello-oligomers (DP less than 6) were eliminated.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6** Time course change of (a) DP and (b) yield of Species 1, 2, and 3 in the Fraction all. The detailed deconvolution process is given in Supporting Information</figcaption></figure>

Speculation on the formation of mono-disperse cello-oligomers

Based on the number and position of downward concaves in the second derivatives, the deconvolution of SEC-MALLS patterns was conducted (for the detailed procedure and fitting results, see Supporting Information, Table S1, and Fig. S1). The DP of Species 1 and 2 decreased along the incubation time (Fig. 6a), while Species 3 had a constant DP of 7 from the first appearance (Table S1). The decrease in DP of Species 1 was slowed down from 14 days, where the DP reached around 40. Similarly, Species 2, DP lower than 30, showed a gradual decrease in DP from the beginning. This suggests that the rate of hydrolysis on the shorter chain was very slow. The reason behind this slow hydrolysis of short chain cellulose is unclear. The high rigidity of short chain cellulose is a possible explanation: the twist or kink, where the scission is likely, rarely appear on the elongated short-chain cellulose.
The yield of each species was obtained from the peak area (Fig. 6b). While Species 1 showed a monotonic decrease in yield, Species 2 initially showed an increase until 14 days of incubation and then gradually decreased in yield. Contrastingly, Species 3 showed gradual and linear increase from the first appearance. This temporal increase in the yield of Species 1 was due to the slower hydrolysis at short-chain cellulose.

From these findings, the speculated mechanism of mono-disperse cello-oligomers obtained from phosphoric acid hydrolysis is schematized in Fig. 7. The initial cellulose input contained two components with the DPw of 170 and 30. These components were subjected to the phosphoric acid hydrolysis, and the DP decreased through the random hydrolysis. However, the rate of hydrolysis became slower when the DP reached around 40, and the pool of cell-oligomers appeared. At 42 days, the DPs of most of pooled

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7** Schematic illustration of speculated mechanism of phosphoric acid hydrolysis. The numbers inside the circles correspond to the DPs, and the number of circles is based on each yield. Water-soluble cello-oligomers with the DP less than 4 are not included in this illustration</figcaption></figure>
cello-oligomers became less than 20. By the solubil-
ity difference depending on the DP, the pool of cello-
oligomers was fractionated into two: cello-oligomers
with the DPw of 15 into water phase (80% H₂O /
20% H₃PO₄) and 8 into methanol phase (78% metha-
nol/17.5% H₂O/4.5% H₃PO₄).

**Conclusion**

The formation of monodisperse cello-oligomers in
the phosphoric acid was monitored quantitatively by
SEC-MALLS. In the concentrated phosphoric acid
solution, dissolved cellulose is gradually hydrolyzed
and cello-oligomers with a DP 14–15 and 7–8 are
selectively formed. Then, by adding water, DP 14–15
precipitates and DP less than 7–8 are soluble in the
supernatant. By the subsequent addition of metha-
nol into the supernatant, the fraction with DP less
than 7–8 precipitates. By washing with water, cello-
oligomers with DP less than 6 are washed away, and
highly monodisperse cello-oligomer with DP 7–8 is
recovered because of the insolubility in water. The
selective formation of DP 14–15 can result from the
slow rate of scission: the rate of hydrolysis becomes
slower when the DP reached around 40, and there
appears the pool of cell-oligomers, from which the
DP 14–15 are fractionated by the use of solubility dif-
ference in aqueous 20 wt% H₃PO₄. The DP 7–8 orig-
nates from the water solubility of cello-oligomers
with a DP less than 6 that are removed away during
washing step. To address the mechanism behind the
slow hydrolysis on the cello-oligomers, the hydrolysis
at various conditions such as high or low temperature
combined with in-situ observation such as small-
angle X-ray or neutron scattering will be needed. In
addition, to better understand the fractionation mech-
anism, the use of different precipitating agents such
as salt solutions will be beneficial.

**Author contributions** NI conceived the concept of the study. NI, YO, YN, DR, and AI designed the experiments. NI and YO performed all experiments. All authors analyzed the data. NI wrote the first version of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

**Funding** N.I. acknowledges support from the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP22H03786 and JP22K19885) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This paper was partly based on the results

obtained from a project, JPNP18016 and PJ-ID 20001845,
commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology
Development Organization (NEDO). This work received the
financial support from the Institut Carnot PolyNat through the
project RoCoCo. "Laboratoire Rhéologie et Procédés" (LRP)
is a part of the LabEx Tec 21 (Investissements d'Avenir-grant
agreement n° ANR-11-LABX-0030).

**Declarations**

**Conflict of interest** The authors declare no competing interests.

**Ethical approval** This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

**References**

Buleon A, Chanzy H (1978) Single crystals of cellulose II. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 16:833–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1978.180160508

Cartier N, Domard A, Chanzy H (1990) Single crystals of chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 12:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(90)90015-3

Cushen JD, Otsuka I, Bates CM et al (2012) Oligosaccharide/silicon-containing block copolymers with 5 nm features for lithographic applications. ACS Nano 6:3424–3433. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300459r

Fittolani G, Vargová D, Seeberger PH et al (2022) Bottom-Up approach to understand chirality transfer across scales in cellulose assemblies. J Am Chem Soc https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c04522

Hata Y, Sawada T, Sakai T, Serizawa T (2018) Enzyme-catalyzed Bottom-Up synthesis of mechanically and physicochemically stable cellulose hydrogels for spatial immobilization of functional Colloidal particles. Biomacromolecules 19:1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00092

Helbert W, Sugiyama J (1998) High-resolution electron microscopy on cellulose II and α-chitin single crystals.
Cellulose 5:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10092
72814665

Hiraishi M, Igarashi K, Kimura S et al (2009) Synthesis of highly ordered cellulose II in vitro using cellodextrin phosphorylase. Carbohydr Res 344:2468–2473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2009.10.002

Isogai A (1997) NMR analysis of cellulose dissolved in aqueous NaOH solutions. Cellulose 4:99–107

Isogai A, Usuda M (1991) Preparation of low-molecular weight celluloses using phosphoric acid. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:339–344

Jiang F, Zhang X, Hwang W et al (2021) Oligocellulose from acid hydrolysis: a revisit. Appl Surf Sci 537:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147783

Meiland M, Liebert T, Heinze T (2011) Tailoring the degree of polymerization of low molecular weight cellulose. Macromol Mater Eng 296:802–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201000424

Muanprasat C, Chatsudthipong V (2017) Chitosan oligosaccharide: biological activities and potential therapeutic applications. Pharmacol Ther 170:80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.10.013

Ono Y, Ishida T, Soeta H et al (2016) Reliable dn/dc values of cellulose, chitin, and cellulose triacetate dissolved in LiCl/N,N-Dimethylacetamide for molecular mass analysis. Biomacromolecules 17:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01302

Oscarson S, Cheallaigh AN (2021) Strategies in oligosaccharide synthesis. Compr Glycosci Second Ed 52:1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819475-1.00075-4

Persson JE, Domard A, Chanzy H (1992) Single crystals of α-chitin. Int J Biol Macromol 14:221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(05)80031-5

Perugino G, Trincone A, Rossi M, Moracci M (2004) Oligosaccharide synthesis by glycosynthases. Trends Biotechnol 22:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.008

Seeberger PH (2008) Automated oligosaccharide synthesis. Chem Soc Rev 37:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1039/b511197h

Serizawa T, Fukaya Y, Sawada T (2017) Self-Assembly of cellulose oligomers into nanoribbon network structures based on kinetic control of enzymatic oligomerization. Langmuir 33:13415–13422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03653

Talsky G, Mayring L, Kreuzer H (1978) High-Resolution, higher-order UV/VIS derivative spectrophotometry. Angew Chemie Int Ed English 17:785–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.197807853

Taylor JB (1957) The water solubilities and heats of solution of short chain cellulosic oligosaccharides. Trans Faraday Soc 53:1198. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9575301198

Yataka Y, Sawada T, Serizawa T (2015) Enzymatic synthesis and post-functionalization of two-dimensional crystalline cellulose oligomers with surface-reactive groups. Chem Commun 51:12525–12528. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cc04378f

Zhang X, Jiang F, Torres-Luna C et al (2021) Solvent-assisted fractionation of oligomeric cellulose and reversible transformation of cellulose II and IV. ACS Biomater Sci Eng https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00885

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.