# Assessment of farmers’ groundnut varietal trait preferences and production constraints in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal

Aissatou Sambou, Maguette Seye, Daniel Foncéka

► To cite this version:

Aissatou Sambou, Maguette Seye, Daniel Foncéka. Assessment of farmers’ groundnut varietal trait preferences and production constraints in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal. Ndjido A. Kane (ed.); Foncéka Daniel (ed.); Dalton Timothy J. (ed.). Crop adaptation and improvement for drought-prone environments, New Prairie Press, pp.28-49, 2022, 978-1-944548-46-9. hal-05180338

HAL Id: hal-05180338

https://hal.science/hal-05180338v1

Submitted on 23 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Crop Adaptation
and Improvement
for Drought-Prone
Environments

Editors: Ndjido A. Kane, Daniel Foncéka,
and Timothy J. Dalton
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

*Crop Adaptation and Improvement for Drought-Prone Environments* by Editors: Ndjido A. Kane, Daniel Foncéka, and Timothy J. Dalton is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-SHAREALIKE/4.0), except where otherwise noted.

Copyright © 2022

Editors: Ndjido A. Kane, Daniel Foncéka, and Timothy J. Dalton

This book's authors retain copyright in their respective contributions where
applicable.

CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Cover image courtesy of: Alain Audebert (CIRAD), August 2021.

Farmers fields with millet and groundnut grown in rotation in a *Faidherbia albida* park located in the Groundnut Basin (Niakhar, Senegal).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

New Prairie Press,

Kansas State University Libraries,
Manhattan, Kansas

Electronic edition available online at: http://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/49

Digital Version ISBN: 978-1-944548-46-9

Paperback Book ISBN: 978-1-944548-47-6

This book was produced with Pressbooks (https://pressbooks.com) and rendered
with Prince.
# PART I

## SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
OF DRYLAND CROPS
PRODUCTION
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
## 2. Assessment of Farmers' Groundnut Varietal Trait Preferences and Production Constraints in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal

**Aissatou Sambou**, ISRA/CERAAS, Senegal

**Maguette Seye**, ISRA/CERAAS, Senegal

**Daniel Foncéka**, CIRAD, France & ISRA/CERAAS, Senegal

### Abstract

Groundnut is a cash crop that generates income and improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in several developing countries. Although Senegal is one of the major producing countries, the national average grain yield remains low. A participatory rural appraisal was conducted in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal in 2015 and aimed to assess farmer perceptions of production constraints and varietal trait preferences. Ninety farmers were randomly selected in nine villages distributed across three regions of the Groundnut Basin. Data was collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and Semi-Structured Interviews (SSI). The results of the study indicated that seed availability was the most limiting factor in groundnut production across villages. Low soil fertility and storage insect pests were the second and third most important constraints respectively. Other constraints included limited access to land, drought, and commercialization. Among varietal traits, farmers unanimously considered pod and haulm yields as the most important. Other important traits mentioned were adaptation to drought, high pod weight, and earliness. These production constraints and varietal trait preferences should be taken into consideration when defining
the groundnut product profiles of the national breeding program in order to
improve productivity and increase the adoption of newly bred cultivars.

Keywords: groundnut, production constraints, farmers, trait preferences

**Introduction**

Groundnut is one of the most important oilseed legumes grown worldwide. Asia and Africa account for more than 90% of global groundnut area and it is cultivated mostly under rainfed conditions by small-scale farmers. The African continent accounts for 31.1% of total global production (FAOSTAT, 2018). In Senegal, groundnut occupies a central role in the agricultural economy since its introduction by explorers in 1836. Historically, the Senegalese economy has relied on groundnuts, which accounts for up to 60% of GDP, 80% of export earnings, and more than half of the planted area from 1961 to 2020 (FAOSTAT, 2020). The crop was grown throughout the country, and particularly in the central area called the Groundnut Basin.

Over recent decades, the contribution of groundnut to GDP has declined. Groundnut production has been reduced due to numerous factors. These include a long drought period starting in the 1970s and continuing to the present. Added to this is poor soil fertility, climate change, a disorganized value chain, inconsistency of the various governmental and donor policies, and the low adoption of newly developed agricultural technologies. A study conducted by Faye et al. (2019) on the adoption rate of improved varieties of main crops grown in Senegal showed evidence that improved groundnut varieties are not widely adopted by farmers; the reported rate is 55%. In the same report, results also showed that the varieties that are cultivated have an average age of more than 10 years. This shows a low penetration of new varieties in the farming environment. Some authors explain this situation by an inadequate awareness, omission of farmers during the process of cultivar development, and farmers' fear of taking risks in testing varieties that are not yet well known by the majority (Ceccarelli & Grando, 2007; Omanya et al., 2007).

Technology transfer to farmers is one of the major bottlenecks of many
agricultural projects in Africa. Efforts should concentrate on improving the
access to the developed innovations because technological change in
agriculture is essential for reducing poverty and stimulating economic
growth, particularly in low-income countries (Dhirifi, 2014). It is also
important that the technologies developed and proposed consider the needs
of the target users. This shortcoming has opened the way to alternative
approaches for increasing the rate of technological adoption by farmers
(Chambers, 1994; Duraiappah et al., 2005).

Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) is one of the most popular strategies. PRA enables local farmers to mobilize and participate in the early stages of technology development. In the particular case of plant breeding, the involvement of farmers as an integral part of the process ensures the participation of the most important stakeholders in the definition of breeding objectives and therefore influences the direction of the research. Plant breeders cannot respond to every quirk of farmers' circumstances but the relevance of breeding research in poor nations can be improved (Haugerud & Collinson, 1990; Sattar et al., 2017). The main objective of most PRA approaches is for a better incorporation of farmers' technical knowledge and identification of research priorities into the breeding programs to develop varieties that meet their needs (Morris & Bellon, 2004). PRA results guide the breeder to focus on farmers preferred traits while addressing the constraints prevailing in the production areas. Many studies, such as Ceccarelli and Grando (2009), reported that PRA approaches enhance the adoption of newly bred cultivars.

To date, there is scant formal documentation on the main groundnut
constraints and the traits preferred by farmers in Senegal. Existing
documents refer to commercialization aspects and to the diagnosis of the
problems related to the whole value chain (Dia et al., 2003; Georges et
al., 2016; Ndiaye, 2018; Noba et al., 2014). Agricultural extension agencies
have often reported low soil fertility and drought as the major constraints
to groundnut production in Senegal. However, the scientific method has
not been used to ascertain groundnut production constraints and farmers'
preferred traits.

Such studies have been conducted and published in most groundnut
growing countries of West Africa. In the study conducted by Coulibaly et al.
(2017) concerning two main groundnut production zones in Niger, drought
appeared as the major constraint affecting production, followed by low soil
fertility. In Burkina Faso, besides organizational difficulties (i.e., access to
credit and access to material, among others), pest attacks and drought were
identified as important constraints followed by diseases (Boubacar et al.,
2020). As a starting point for the breeding program in Togo, a PRA was
conducted in three regions, identifying leaf spot diseases, rosette,
groundnut bud necrosis, and insects, such as pod sucking bug and bruchid,
as the most important constraints limiting the production (Banla et al., 2018).
High pod yield is the most preferred trait in almost all reported studies.
However, pod size and oil content were the second and third preferred traits
in the Savanes region in Togo, and early maturing in Niger (Banla et al., 2018;
Coulibaly et al., 2017).

The PRA approach has been widely used across Africa for other crops
including potato, maize, cowpea, cassava, sweet potato, and pearl millet
(Abakemal et al., 2013; Baafi et al., 2015; Egbadzor et al., 2013; Kanfany et
al., 2020; Muhinyuza et al., 2012; Njoku et al., 2014). Those studies clearly
established that constraints and the trait preferences of farmers for a given
crop are location specific. Hence, plant breeders should consider both local
adaptation and, when possible, adaptation to a wide range of environments
when developing a new cultivar (Omanya et al., 2007). This study applies
PRA to gather information and farmers' knowledge to identify groundnut
production constraints and to assess traits preferred by farmers in the
Groundnut Basin of Senegal. This will serve as important background
information to the breeding program and will enable the development of
more popular varieties that meet farmers' needs for wide adoption.

Materials and Methods

1. Study Areas and Sampling

The study was conducted between March and April 2015 in the Groundnut
Basin located in central Senegal, where groundnut and pearl millet are the
predominant crops (FAOSTAT, 2015). Three representative groundnut-
growing regions of Senegal, Kaolack, Kaffrine, and Tambacounda, were
purposefully selected based on the importance of groundnut in terms of
production and area (Table 1). During the 2014 cropping season, these three
regions accounted for 39% of the national groundnut area and over 42%
of total groundnut production (FAOSTAT, 2015). With the help of the local extension officers, one department was selected in each region based on the number of farmers and farmers' organizations in the department. Three villages were then selected in each department according to their accessibility and the importance of groundnut production.

<table><caption>**Table 1**

**Characteristics of Selected Groundnut Production Regions in Senegal**</caption><thead><tr><td>Regions</td><td>Cultivated area (ha)</td><td>Production (mt)</td><td>Precipitation (mm)</td><td>Selected communities</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Kaffrine</td><td>209,100</td><td>272,570</td><td>655</td><td>Kathiot, Kahi</td></tr><tr><td>Kaolack</td><td>169,843</td><td>223,001</td><td>655</td><td>Guinth Kaye, Kaymor, Porokhane</td></tr><tr><td>Tambacounda</td><td>104,210</td><td>161,941</td><td>741</td><td>Koussanar, Makacolibatang</td></tr><tr><td>Senegal</td><td>1,134,330</td><td>1,432,086</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

Nine study sites were considered in the study (Figure 1). The villages were located in seven rural communes: three in Kaolack, two in Kaffrine, and two in Tambacounda. A focus group discussion was held in each of the selected villages to develop a general idea of groundnut cultivation in the corresponding area. In addition, within each village, 10 farmers were randomly selected for semi-structured interviews, creating a sample of 90 producers.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1</figcaption></figure>

Figure 1 - Map Showing Sampling Locations in the Groundnut Basin

## 2. Data Collection and Analysis

Local extension staff at the respective localities facilitated the PRA process by mobilizing farmers to participate in the focused group discussions. Both formal and informal approaches were employed to collect data for the study. The informal approach was used to generate information on farmer perceptions at the community level. The discussions involved nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with one at each village. Each focus group comprised of 10 to 17 farmers. The FGDs were standardized using a checklist of topics to be covered. The topics discussed included farm characteristics and farmers' agronomic practices, farmers' trait preferences for groundnut varieties, marketing of their products, and the perceived constraints affecting production.

The group discussions were followed by formal interviews using semi-structured questionnaires to explore issues that were more specific.
Individual farmers were surveyed using a semi-structured questionnaire to collect information on production constraints and farmer's preferences for varieties. This enabled each individual farmer to express their opinion independently.

Scoring and ranking techniques were used to assess farmers' varietal trait preferences and constraints to groundnut production. Data was coded and entered in Microsoft Excel. Analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Scientists (SPSS version 19) and summarized into percentages and means. Variables were subjected to descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, one-sample t (two-sided), and Fisher tests. R was used to draw the map showing the PRA sites.

# Results

## 1. Demographic and Socio-economic Characters

In the studied sites, mostly men produce groundnut. The sex ratio is 88.9% males to 11.1% females (Table 2). In our sample, 72.22% of the respondents were farmers by occupation while 27.78% had additional income-generating activities. Most of the interviewed farmers (82.23%) were uneducated. A few (8.89%) possessed a primary school certificate and 5.56% a secondary certificate. The age of respondents ranged between 35 and 60 years. The proportion of the active population that were groundnut producers was 71.11%. Most of the farmers (63%) did not have any form of support or training and only 36% of the farmers belonged to a farmers' association.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>Figure 2</figcaption></figure>

Figure 2 – Average Pod Yield Obtained as a Function of the Area and Application Rate of Mineral Fertilizer

## 2. Groundnut Importance and Production Level

The selected rural communes were predominantly groundnut producing areas, but other crops, like cereals, played a key role in the agricultural system. The average landholding varied from 1 to 30 ha and there was a significant difference in the importance of the crops grown in each location. A ranking of the importance of groundnut compared to other crops was completed based on the cultivated area allocated to groundnut and the production level. As expected, in almost all rural communes, groundnut occupied the largest share of land and was ranked first with an average mean rank of 1.3. In the central part of the peanut basin (Kaolack, Kaffrine) groundnut was the most important crop followed by pearl millet. Elsewhere in the eastern part of the country (Tambacounda), corn or sorghum were ranked as the second most important crop. Mean comparison of yields reveals significant differences between localities (p = 0.042). The average estimated grain yield in 2014 was 1,112 Kg ha⁻¹. The highest estimated grain yield (1,500 Kg ha⁻¹) was recorded in Guinth Kaye, while the lowest value 0.9 Kg ha⁻¹ was recorded in Porokhane. Both localities are in the same region (Kaolack). A similar trend was observed for the application of fertilizer
(Figure 2). On average, 116 Kg ha-1 of NPK fertilizer (6-20-10) was recorded at Guinth Kaye while 28 Kg ha-1 was recorded at Porokhane.

<table><caption>Table 2
Average Socio-demographic Profile of Interviewed Farmers by Region</caption><thead><tr><th>Variables</th><th>Kaolack</th><th>Kaffrine</th><th>Tambacounda</th><th>Total</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Gender</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>4</td><td>10</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Male</td><td>27</td><td>27</td><td>26</td><td>80</td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Age</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;15</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>15-35</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>5</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>35-60</td><td>18</td><td>15</td><td>18</td><td>51</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>60" &gt;= 60</td><td>9</td><td>10</td><td>6</td><td>25</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Education</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Koranic school</td><td>27</td><td>20</td><td>12</td><td>59</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>Local language</td><td>1</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>15</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>none</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Primary</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Member of a Farmer Organization</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>26</td><td>17</td><td>11</td><td>54</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>4</td><td>13</td><td>19</td><td>36</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Occupation Other than Farming</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>8</td><td>25</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>20</td><td>23</td><td>22</td><td>65</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Subsidy from the Government</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>25</td><td>19</td><td>19</td><td>63</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>5</td><td>11</td><td>11</td><td>27</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Received Training in Groundnut Cultivation</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>30</td><td>24</td><td>20</td><td>74</td><td>82</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>0</td><td>6</td><td>10</td><td>16</td><td>18</td></tr></tbody></table>
### 3. Varieties Grown and Their Provenances

Five known and named varieties were cultivated in the surveyed zones: GH119-20, 73-33, 28-206, Fleur 11, and 55-437 (Table 3). There were differences in the most commonly planted varieties by location (Figure 3). Out of the five varieties, 73-33 was the most cultivated and was ranked first in almost all rural communes except in Guinth Kaye, Porokhane, and to some extend Kaymor, where either 28-206 or GH119-20 were more commonly cultivated.

<table><caption>Table 3
Attributes of the Cultivated Varieties</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Varieties</th><th rowspan="2">Released Year</th><th colspan="6">Attributes</th></tr><tr><th>Pod Yield (t/ha)</th><th>Haulm Yield (t/ha)</th><th>Cycle (Days)</th><th>100 Seed Weight (g)</th><th>Seed Size</th><th>Main Use</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>GH119-20</td><td>1960</td><td>1.5-2</td><td>2-2.5</td><td>110</td><td>85-90</td><td>large</td><td>confectionery</td></tr><tr><td>73-33</td><td>1973</td><td>2-2.5</td><td>1.5-2</td><td>110</td><td>50-52</td><td>medium</td><td>oil</td></tr><tr><td>Fleur11</td><td>1995</td><td>2.5-3</td><td>2</td><td>90</td><td>50-55</td><td>medium</td><td>oil-confectionery</td></tr><tr><td>55-437</td><td>1994</td><td>1.5-2</td><td>1</td><td>90</td><td>35-38</td><td>small</td><td>oil</td></tr><tr><td>28-206</td><td>1928</td><td>1.5-2</td><td>1.5</td><td>120</td><td>45-49</td><td>small</td><td>oil</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3</figcaption></figure>

Figure 3 – Popular Varieties Cultivated in the Studied Sites

The variety 73-33 was the most grown across all the studied sites. The 28-206 was specific in Guinth Kaye and Porokhane and the variety GH119-20 was present in Kaymor. Fleur 11 was not very popular in Kaffrine (Kahi and Kathiot). A small portion of respondents (2%) did not have any idea about the type of variety they grew. Most farmers (83%) recycled seed by keeping a portion of the previous harvest. Only 20% obtained government-subsidized seeds or procured them from the local market. It was only in Koussanar, a rural commune of Tambacounda, where farmers were organized in a cooperative and multiplied their seed for the next coming growing season.

## 4. Trait Preferences

The mean rankings of farmer-preferred traits for groundnut varieties are presented in Figure 4. Characteristics with the smallest mean rank (1) are perceived to be the most important and the highest value (5) is considered as less important. Except for tolerance to biotic stresses (P = 0.007), where a significant difference was observed between rural communes, traits were ranked similarly by farmers interviewed in the study zones. Most of the farmers identified haulm yield as the second most important characteristic after pod yield, except in Koussanar where good pod filling was ranked
highest. The same locality identified erect plant stature as an important groundnut characteristic for variety adoption. High seed weight is also a preferred feature for groundnut growers in Kahi, Kathio, Kaymor, and Makacolibatang. Other important traits mentioned were adaptation to abiotic stresses such as short cycle and tolerance to drought. Tolerance to biotic constraints like resistance to leaf diseases is desired in groundnut variety. In general, farmers from the different sites did not consider good taste as an important trait for groundnut variety.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>Figure 4</figcaption></figure>

Figure 4 - Farmers Preferences for Groundnut Variety Traits Across Rural Communes

## 5. Production Constraints

Prioritization of the constraints was based on the mean ranking given by farmers. These constraints were identified and listed during the focus group discussions. Each interviewed farmer further ranked them (Table 4). Characteristics with the lowest mean rank are classified as the most important. The most important constraints mentioned by farmers across sites were seed availability, land degradation, insects at storage, and land availability. Drought was ranked fifth, with a significant difference between sites. Marketing and leaf diseases were ranked sixth and seventh respectively with substantial differences in farmers' responses in ranking marketing.
These constraints were common to groundnut growing areas but the order
varied from site to site. Insects, mainly pod-sucking bugs (Pentatomidae
and Lygaeidae) and groundnut bruchid (Bruchidae), were considered the
most common constraint to groundnut storage and were ranked as the
most important in Kathiot alongside leaf diseases. Lack of tools was ranked
in Koussanar, Kaymor, and Kathiot as an important constraint. Regarding
drought, there was a noteworthy difference between respondents in their
respective studied areas. More than half of the respondents (58%) did not
classify drought as a major constraint to groundnut cultivation, while the
remaining participants (42%) said the opposite. The damages were not so
important and drought at the vegetative stage of the life cycle was more
frequent. However, terminal drought caused more damage when it
happened.
<table><caption>Table 4 Relative Ranking of Major Groundnut Production Constraints by Location</caption><thead><tr><th>Constraints</th><th>Guinth Kaye</th><th>Kahi</th><th>Kathiot</th><th>Kaymor</th><th>Koussanar</th><th>Maka</th><th>Porokhane</th><th>Total Mean</th><th>F</th><th>Rank</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Land degradation</td><td>2.31</td><td>2.33</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.06</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>4.66</td><td>2</td><td>0.47</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>Storage insects</td><td>4.01</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>2.4</td><td>1.56</td><td>4</td><td>2.04</td><td>0.063</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Leaf diseases</td><td>3.89</td><td>2.78</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>3.2</td><td>3.41</td><td>2.56</td><td>0.406</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Drought</td><td>4</td><td>2.67</td><td>3</td><td>3.67</td><td>1.75</td><td>1.75</td><td>4</td><td>2.36</td><td>0.023*</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Land availability</td><td>2.17</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3.71</td><td>4.1</td><td>3</td><td>2.13</td><td>0.597</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>Seed availability</td><td>2.8</td><td>1.63</td><td>2</td><td>1.6</td><td>1.67</td><td>2.2</td><td>2</td><td>1.91</td><td>0.145</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Commercialization</td><td>3.44</td><td>2</td><td>2.5</td><td>3</td><td>1.75</td><td>2</td><td>2.4</td><td>2.5</td><td>0.018*</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Lack of tools</td><td>5</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2.4</td><td>1.67</td><td>2.5</td><td>2</td><td>2.58</td><td>0.047*</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Cattle damage</td><td>5.07</td><td>4.22</td><td>4.34</td><td>3</td><td>3.5</td><td>4</td><td>5</td><td>3.33</td><td>0.667</td><td>9</td></tr></tbody></table>
Discussion

The presence of women farmers (11.1%) in this study was very low and reflects their limited access to land. One major consideration of this situation is socio-cultural. In Senegal, land acquisition is through inheritance from father to son. Another aspect that contributes strongly to this imbalance is the status of the family chief, typically conferred to the man who theoretically is in charge of the family's daily expenses. The limited involvement of women in groundnut cultivation has also been reported in other countries of West Africa (Banla et al., 2018; Oppong-Sekyere et al., 2015). Women do not own land, but they are involved in the cultivation. Arable land access is a real problem for women in West Africa, particularly in Senegal. PRA conducted on sorghum and pearl millet reported limited access to land by women, justifying their low involvement in the production (Kanfany et al., 2020). Conversely, in Burkina Faso, Sinare et al. (2021) highlighted the large involvement of women (more than 50%) in groundnut cultivation despite their limited and unequitable access to production resources. A similar situation was reported in Tanzania where men and women were equally involved in groundnut production (Daudi et al., 2018). Women's engagement in groundnut cultivation is socio-culturally specific.

Because the constraints listed by the farmers in the studied sites involve different actors of the value chain, we classified them into two categories. The first group included seeds availability, land availability, and commercialization. The second group encompassed low soil fertility, insects at storage, drought, and leaf diseases. The consistency of ranking the first group of constraints over the communities suggests that these are major constraints affecting groundnut production in the Groundnut Basin. These difficulties are similar in that the government and the private sector plays a greater role than research in helping farmers solve these problems. However, it is important to underscore the efforts made by the government to reorganize and make the groundnut sector more efficient. The most recent is the Program for Accelerated Pace of Agriculture (PRACAS) with a seed capital reconstitution program of 3.5 billion CFA. This program aims to
provide producers with a quantity of quality seeds. These efforts are
beneficial, but it is more than important to put in place a system or tool to
estimate the needs and consequently establish a production plan of the first
generations in terms of seed multiplication (G1, G2, and G3). The traceability
of the subsequent levels (G4, R1, and R2) allows one to know in real-time
who has which variety, what level, where, and when the product will be
available. The answers to these different questions will help resolve in part
the availability of seeds, one of the major constraints.

In the second group, low soil fertility, insects at storage, and drought
were identified as major constraints limiting the production, followed by
leaf diseases. This finding confirms the deteriorating state of soil fertility in
Senegal reported earlier by previous studies conducted in the same regions
(Kanfany et al., 2020). Senegal falls in the Sahelian zone and is subjected
to different scenarios of drought characterized by unequal distribution of
rainfall in both time and space. Consequently, the production of many crops
is threatened yearly by the interannual and across location rainfall variability.
Almost all West African countries identified drought as a major constraint
to groundnut production (Banla et al., 2018; Coulibaly et al., 2017; Oppong-
Sekyere et al., 2015; Ntare et al., 2008). In the present study, drought is
perceived to be more important in the eastern part of the Groundnut Basin
in the Tambacounda region (annual average rainfall 800 mm) than in the
central zone (average annual rainfall between 500-600 mm). This
paradoxical situation could results from the rainfall distribution and the type
of cultivated varieties. In fact, 73-33, a long cycle variety (110 days), was the
most cultivated in the eastern zone; in the central areas a mix of medium
and short cycle varieties was grown (55-437 and Fleur 11, 90 days). The
most drastic years in groundnut cultivation in Senegal were 2002 and 2011,
due to low and erratic rainfall patterns. The impact of such events is not
only extremely damaging, but also lasting. Farmers revealed that the rainy
seasons become shorter from year to year. Therefore, short cycle varieties
are wanted. However, it is important to report that during FGD, farmers in
the studied areas did not want extra-early maturing varieties because such
varieties might be the first to mature in an area and therefore might suffer
from too much rainfall and from livestock damage. They need groundnut
varieties that can mature early and escape the drought before it sets in.
Drought tolerance was unevenly ranked for any given site, showing that
they depended greatly on specific localities. Therefore, the development
of varieties better adapted to drought becomes an important breeding
objective for each specific location.

In Kathiot and Kaymor (Nioro zone), leaf diseases were the major constraint that affected groundnut production; in other localities, leaf diseases were not perceived by farmers as important. The traditional measure taken by farmers to deal with leaf diseases and soil borne diseases in the study areas was crop rotation. Primarily, groundnut is cultivated in rotation with pearl millet in most of the studied zones or with other cereal species such as sorghum, maize, rice, and fonio. Crop rotation plays an important role in groundnut management. It is known that crop rotation is beneficial to restore soil fertility, as well as to prevent crop pests and soil borne diseases. According to farmers, crop rotation is a good strategy that can restore soil fertility and avoid severe leaf diseases. These results indicated that breeding for improved drought tolerance and leaf disease resistance should constitute major breeding objectives to ensure high yield and varietal acceptance by farmers in specific zones.

High pod yield is the most preferred trait reported in most studies conducted on groundnut across Africa (Banla et al., 2018; Coulibaly et al., 2017; Ntare et al., 2008; Oppong-Sekyere et al., 2015). Contrary to the findings reported by Banla et al. (2018) in Togo, where pod size and oil content followed high pod yield as the most important traits, in the present study, high biomass yield was ranked as the second preferred trait in all study areas. This is attributed to the high feeding values of groundnut haulm to animals and the Sahelian context of Senegal. Hence, breeding for dual purposes, high pod and biomass become essential for variety adoption. Farmers gave much importance to seed and pod size in the study and correlated big pod size to high pod yield. However, scientific studies have shown that there is no correlation between pod yield and morphometric characteristics in the Sahel (Foncéka et al., 2012). Another important consideration for farmers is the attractiveness and the marketability side of large pods and seeds. The fact that groundnut is a cash crop could justify why farmers paid much attention to pod and seed size. These findings corroborate the importance of large pods and seeds reported in West African countries, especially in Togo, Burkina, and Ghana (Banla et al., 2018; Sinare et al., 2021. In the past, groundnut was initially cultivated for its oil correlated to maturity. Oil content and good taste received little attention at the farmers'
level in the present study. This result could differ if the survey had considered the perspectives of industrial processors and end-users. These suggest that in the selection process for new improved varieties, yield and yield-related traits must constitute the primary selection criteria for a new improved variety to be accepted by farmers. The agreement between farmers and breeders in some of the criteria used for selecting groundnut varieties suggests the need for collaborative work to improve the efficiency of selection.

## Conclusion

In view of the results, it appears that breeding efforts should focus on developing high yielding (pod and biomass) and early-maturing varieties that will minimize crop loss through drought escape. To increase adoption and meet farmers' needs in the Groundnut Basin of Senegal, groundnut breeders should take into consideration the varietal preferences identified. The soil degradation identified by farmers as a major constraint lays down a multidisciplinary research approach based on innovative practices to limit and prevent soil degradation. The findings also call out the government and the private sector on land issues, access to equipment, seed availability, and commercialization, all identified as major constraints to increasing groundnut productivity.

## References

Abakemal, D., Hussein, S., Derera, J., & Laing, M. (2013). Farmers' perceptions of maize production systems and breeding priorities, and their implications for the adoption of new varieties in selected areas of the highland agro-ecology of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(11), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n11p159

Baafi, E., Manu-aduening, J., Carey, E. E., Ofori, K., Blay, E. T., & Gracen, V. E. (2015). Constraints and Breeding Priorities for Increased Sweetpotato Utilization in Ghana. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n4p1
Banla, E. M., Dzidzienyo, D. K., Beatrice, I. E., Offei, S. K., Tongoona, P., & Desmae, H. (2018). Groundnut production constraints and farmers' trait preferences: A pre-breeding study in Togo. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 14(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0275-y

Ceccarelli, S., & Grando, S. (2007). Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: An example of demand driven research. Euphytica, 155(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9336-8

Ceccarelli, S., & Grando, S. (2009). Participatory plant breeding. Cereals, 3, 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72297-9_13

Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development, 22(10), 1437-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90030-2

Coulibaly, M. A., Ntare, B. R., Gracen, V. E., & Danquah, E. (2017). Groundnut production constraints and farmers' preferred varieties in Niger. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 4(1), 202-207.

Daudi, H., Shimelis, H., Laing, M., Okori, P., & Mponda, O. (2018). Groundnut production constraints, farming systems, and farmer-preferred traits in Tanzania. Journal of Crop Improvement, 32(6), 812-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1531801

Dhrifi, A. (2014). Agricultural productivity and poverty alleviation: What role for technological innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 4(1), 139-158.

Dia, D., Diop, A. M., Fall, C. S., & Seck, T. (2003). Sur les sentiers de la collecte et de la commercialisation de l'arachide au Sénégal: Tirer les leçons du passé pour rebâtir une filière performante. ISRA, Fig 1.

Duraiappah, A. K., Roddy, P., & Parry, J. E. (2005). Have participatory approaches increased capabilities? International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), June, 1-31.

Egbadzor, K. F., Yeboah, M., Offei, S. K., Ofori, K., & Danquah, E. Y. (2013). Farmers' key production constraints and traits desired in cowpea in
Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 5(January), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD12.118

FAOSTAT. (2015, 2020). FAO Database, Statistiques Agricoles.
http://faostat.fao.org

Faye, N. F., Magne, L., Sy, M. R., Ndiaye, D., Sakho, M., Sawadogo, K., & Spielman, D. (2019). Adoption et utilisation des variétés améliorées au Sénégal: cas des céréales et des légumineuses. Projet d'appui aux politiques agricoles (PAPA).

Foncéka, D., Tossim, H., Rivallan, R., Vignes, H., Faye, I., Ndoye, O., Moretzsohn, M. C., Bertioli, D. J., Glaszmann, J., Courtois, B., & Rami, J. (2012). Fostered and left behind alleles in peanut: Interspecific QTL mapping reveals footprints of domestication and useful natural variation for breeding. BMC Plant Biology, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-26

Georges, N., Fang, S., Beckline, M., & Wu, Y. (2016). Potentials of the Groundnut Sector towards Achieving Food Security in Senegal. OALib, 03(09), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102991

Haugerud, A., & Collinson, M. P. (1990). Plants, genes and people: Improving the relevance of plant breeding in Africa. Experimental Agriculture, 26(3), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700018500

Kanfany, G., Diack, O., Kane, N. A., Gangashetty, P., Sy, O., Fofana, A., & Cisse, N. (2020). Implications of farmer perceived production constraints and varietal preferences to pearl millet breeding in Senegal. African Crop Science Society, 28(3), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v28i3.6

Morris, M. L., & Bellon, M. R. (2004). Participatory plant breeding research: Opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica, 136(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000019509.37769.b1

Muhinyuza, J. B., Shimelis, H., Melis, R., Sibiya, J., & Nzaramba, M. N. (2012). Participatory assessment of potato production constraints and trait preferences in potato cultivar development in Rwanda. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1(2), 358-380.
Ndiaye, G. (2018). Analysis of market liberalization and the groundnut sector in Senegal. *International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences*, 4(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20180402.13

Njoku, D. N., Egesi, C. N., Gracen, V. E., Offei, S. K., Asante, I. K., & Danquah, E. Y. (2014). Identification of pro-vitamin A Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties for adaptation and adoption through participatory research. *Journal of Crop Improvement*, 28(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2014.888694

Noba, K., Ngom, A., Guèye, M., Bassène, C., Kane, M., Diop, I., ... Tidiane Ba, A. (2014). L'arachide au Sénégal: état des lieux, contraintes et perspectives pour la relance de la filière. *OCL – Oilseeds and Fats*, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2013039

Ntare, B., Ndjeunga, J., Waliyar, F., Kodio, O., Echekwu, C. A., Kapran, I., Da Sylva, A., Diallo, A., Amadou, A., Bissala, H., & Sako, K. (2008). Farmer participatory evaluation and dissemination of improved groundnut varieties in West Africa. *International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics*.

Omanya, G. O., Weltzien-Rattunde, E., Sogodogo, D., Sanogo, M., Hanssens, N., Guero, Y., & Zangre, R. (2007). Participatory varietal selection with improved pearl millet in West Africa. *Experimental Agriculture*, 43(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479706004248

Oppong-Sekyere, D., Akromah, R., Akpalu, M. M., Ninfaa, A. D., & Nyamah, E. Y. (2015). Participatory rural appraisal of constraints to groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in northern Ghana. *International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review*, 3(10), 54–76.

Sattar, R. S., Wang, S., Ashraf, M. F., & Tahir, N. (2017). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to study adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: A research-note on mixed method approach. *International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development*, 5(2), 539–544. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313313859

Sinare, B., Miningou, A., Nebié, B., Eleblu, J., Kwadwo, O., Traoré, A., ... Desmae, H. (2021). Participatory analysis of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea
L.) cropping system and production constraints in Burkina Faso. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 17(1).