# Intranasal Inoculation of Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice Produces Nasal Infection with Rapid Brain Dissemination

Carolina Coelho, Emma Camacho, Antonio Salas, Alexandre Alanio, Arturo Casadevall

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

To cite this version:

Carolina Coelho, Emma Camacho, Antonio Salas, Alexandre Alanio, Arturo Casadevall. Intranasal Inoculation of Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice Produces Nasal Infection with Rapid Brain Dissemination. MSphere, 2019, 4 (4), pp.e00483-19. 10.1128/mSphere.00483-19. hal-05296441

HAL Id: hal-05296441

https://hal.science/hal-05296441v1

Submitted on 6 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Intranasal Inoculation of *Cryptococcus neoformans* in Mice Produces Nasal Infection with Rapid Brain Dissemination

Carolina Coelho,ª,ᵇ,ᶜ Emma Camacho,ª Antonio Salas,ᵈ Alexandre Alanio,ᵉ,ᵉ Arturo Casadevallª

**ABSTRACT** *Cryptococcus neoformans* is an important fungal pathogen, causing life-threatening pneumonia and meningoencephalitis. Brain dissemination of *C. neoformans* is thought to be a consequence of an active infection in the lung which then extravasates to other sites. Brain invasion results from dissemination via either transport by free yeast cells in the bloodstream or Trojan horse transport within mononuclear phagocytes. We assessed brain dissemination in three mouse models of infection: intravenous, intratracheal, and intranasal models. All three modes of infection resulted in dissemination of *C. neoformans* to the brain in less than 3 h. Further, *C. neoformans* was detected in the entirety of the upper respiratory tract and the ear canals of mice. In recent years, intranasal infection has become a popular mechanism to induce pulmonary infection because it avoids surgery, but our findings show that instillation of *C. neoformans* produces cryptococcal nasal infection. These findings imply that immunological studies using intranasal infection should assume that the initial sites of infection of infection are brain, lung, and upper respiratory tract, including the nasal airways.

**IMPORTANCE** *Cryptococcus neoformans* causes an estimated 181, 000 deaths each year, mostly associated with untreated HIV/AIDS. *C. neoformans* has a ubiquitous worldwide distribution. Humans become infected from exposure to environmental sources, after which the fungus lays dormant within the human body. Upon AIDS-induced immunosuppression or therapy-induced immunosuppression (required for organ transplant recipients or those suffering from autoimmune disorders), cryptococcal disease reactivates and causes life-threatening meningitis and pneumonia. This study showed that upon contact with the host, *C. neoformans* can quickly (a few hours) reach the host brain and also colonizes the nose of infected animals. Therefore, this work paves the way to better knowledge of how *C. neoformans* travels through the host body. Understanding how *C. neoformans* infects, disseminates, and survives within the host is critically required so that we can prevent infections and the disease caused by this deadly fungus.

**KEYWORDS** *Cryptococcus*, *Cryptococcus gattii*, *Cryptococcus neoformans*, brain, infection, nose

The genus *Cryptococcus* is populated by environmental fungi, wood-rotting fungi most commonly associated with trees but also with bird guano. Two species of *Cryptococcus* cause disease in humans, characterized mainly by pneumonia and life-threatening meningoencephalitis. *Cryptococcus neoformans* is the most prevalent

**Citation** Coelho C, Camacho E, Salas A, Alanio A, Casadevall A. 2019. Intranasal inoculation of *Cryptococcus neoformans* in mice produces nasal infection with rapid brain dissemination. *mSphere* 4:e00483-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00483-19.

**Editor** Aaron P. Mitchell, Carnegie Mellon University

**Copyright** © 2019 Coelho et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Address correspondence to Carolina Coelho, c.coelho@exeter.ac.uk, or Arturo Casadevall, arturo.casadevall@jhu.edu.

*Cryptococcus neoformans* and *C. gattii* invade the mouse brain very quickly: under 3 hours after intranasal infection. This impacts experimental models and suggests the brain as a latent reservoir in animals. @caipcoelho @ACasadevall1 @Emma_BCC @a_alanio

Received 7 July 2019

Accepted 22 July 2019

Published 7 August 2019

<footnote>ªW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA</footnote>

<footnote>ᵇMedical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom</footnote>

<footnote>ᶜDepartment of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom</footnote>

<footnote>ᵈJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA</footnote>

<footnote>ᵉInstitut Pasteur, Molecular Mycology Unit, CNRS UMR2000, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote>fLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisière, Saint-Louis, Fernand Widal, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France</footnote>
pathogen of the genus *Cryptococcus*, causing approximately 200,000 deaths each year, mostly associated with HIV-positive individuals, while the closely related species *C. gattii* was responsible for an outbreak in British Columbia in apparently immunocompetent individuals (1–3).

The current paradigm for the pathogenesis of human cryptococcosis emerged from a series of observations made over several decades. Exposure is due to inhalation of infectious propagules from environmental niches. Colonization of the lungs by spores, desiccated yeasts, or yeast cells is thought to be quickly controlled by the human immune system via granuloma formation (called cryptococcoma). In the 1950s, silent cryptococcal granulomas were reported in lungs, establishing a parallel to latent tuberculosis (4). In support of this notion, serological studies have established that adults have antibodies to *C. neoformans* (5) or delayed hypersensitivity skin reactions (6), consistent with asymptomatic infection. Both teenagers and children under the age of 5 living in urban areas are immunoreactive to *Cryptococcus* (7, 8). Finally, HIV patients are infected with a serotype most commonly isolated from the place where they were born or where they spent their infancy (9). Hence, humans are exposed very early in life to these yeasts without developing noticeable disease. The concept of silent or latent infections due to containment in the lungs is further supported by the observation that some recipients of lung transplants develop a cryptococcal infection originating from the donor lung (10–12). Even though most *C. neoformans* infections in humans are asymptomatic, a significant and unknown proportion of humans become latent carriers of *C. neoformans*, which may reactivate as host immunity declines.

Given that the initial human infection is thought to start from the lungs, research in the pathogenesis of *C. neoformans* commonly uses pulmonary infection models. The two inoculation routes most commonly used in mouse models are intratracheal (i.t.) infection and intranasal (i.n.) infection. Intratracheal infection delivers *C. neoformans* directly to the respiratory tree but requires surgery and significant skill. In contrast, intranasal infection is done by depositing a solution containing *C. neoformans* in the nose of an anesthetized mouse, which then inhales it, as these animals are obligate nose breathers. Since intranasal infection does not require surgery, it has become a popular mode of induction of *C. neoformans* infection in mice. Intranasal infection has been accepted as a procedure for inducing pulmonary infection without much investigation as to what actually happens after nose deposition of an infective inoculum. In some cases, researchers use a third route of infection, the intravenous (i.v.) route, since it allows rapid dissemination to the brain, presumably by bypassing the lung immune response (13, 14). Both the intranasal route (13) and the intravenous route (in outbred mice) have been shown to be a relevant model for comparisons to human infection (15–17).

In this study, we compared intravenous, intratracheal, and intranasal infections and observed that all produce rapid brain dissemination. Additionally, we found that intranasal inoculation leads to the presence of yeasts in upper respiratory airways and in the auditory tract. These observations have important implications for the interpretation of intranasal studies in considering immune responses and aspects of pathogenesis.

## RESULTS

We compared 3 routes of infection (intravenous [i.v.], intranasal [i.n.], and intratracheal [i.t.]) to ascertain the kinetics of *C. neoformans* dissemination to the brain (Fig. 1). We had previously verified that the infectious dose of $5 \times 10^5$ CFU induces 100% mortality in 22 days for H99E. We quantified fungal burden in blood, lung, and brains. We detected fungi in blood in two mice, although we also detected bacteria in blood in the same two mice (data not shown). This suggests that the animals with *C. neoformans* in the blood had severe systemic infection that may have led to concomitant bacterial infection. We conclude that the majority of animals clear *C. neoformans* from the bloodstream. After 7 days of infection, we measured increased numbers of yeast cells in the brain after i.v. inoculation (more than $10^5$, upper limit of detection)
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 1** C. neoformans dissemination to the brain and lung after different inoculation routes. Mice were infected with $5 \times 10^5$ C. neoformans strain H99E cells via the intravenous (i.v.), intranasal (i.n.), and intratracheal (i.t.) routes. CFU levels in brain (left panels) and lung (right panels) were analyzed at (A) 3 days postinfection (p.i.) and (B) 7 days p.i. Each data point represents one individual mouse, and bars represent means and standard deviations (SD). Numbers represent *P* values calculated from the two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli, with a false-discovery rate (q) of 5% compared to i.v. infection.</figcaption></figure>

than after i.n. or i.t. inoculation (below $10^4$ CFU). There was a slight increase in fungal burden in the lung when the i.t. route is used compared to the i.v. route. We did not detect differences in brain fungal burden between i.n. inoculation and i.t. inoculation. Remarkably, we noted that there was a substantial amount of yeast cells in mouse brains as early as day 3 after inoculation of yeast by both the i.n. and i.t. routes, which prompted us to ask how quickly *C. neoformans* disseminates to the mouse brain.

We focused on the intranasal model since this procedure is noninvasive, requiring only a brief period of anesthesia administration and no surgery. We found that the fungal burden in the brain 3 h postinfection with an inoculum of $5 \times 10^5$ yeast was on the order of hundreds of CFU for most animals (Fig. 2A). The surprising finding that yeasts were detectable in the brain within hours after i.n. inoculation prompted us to perform additional controls. For one experiment, we rinsed the brains (to remove possible yeast contaminations from the exterior surface of the brain during necropsy), but the results were comparable to those seen in the first experiment (data pooled from the two experiments are shown). We also culled one noninfected (sentinel) mouse at the end of the experiment to measure levels of contamination of tools and materials during necropsy that could have resulted in cross-contamination of the tissue samples. We recovered no CFU from the sentinel mouse, which gave us confidence that the fungal burdens that we detected resulted from brain infection and did not represent accidental contamination (data not shown). To investigate if early dissemination could occur at lower doses, we infected animals with $5 \times 10^3$ CFU (at this dose, *C. neoformans* causes 80% mortality at 40 days). We still observed quick dissemination to the brain, indicating that the fungal burden was not a consequence of exposure to overwhelmingly high numbers of yeasts. Finally, we observed quick dissemination to the brain with strain H99O, a strain closely related to the original H99 clinical isolate of *C. neoformans*, as well as the R265 strain of *C. gattii*, the strain associated with the
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 2** *C. neoformans* is detected in the brain as early as 3 h postinfection (hpi) after i.n. infection. (A) Mice were infected with either 5 × 10⁵ CFU (High dose) or 5 × 10³ CFU (Low dose) of H99E via intranasal instillation and euthanized at the indicated time to measure yeast tissue burden. (B) Mice were infected with strain H99O of *C. neoformans* or strain R265 of *C. gattii*. Each data point represents one individual mouse, and bars represent means and SD.</figcaption></figure>

Vancouver outbreak (Fig. 2B). It is possible that the detected yeast burden was arrested in the small capillaries (18–21) or in the postcapillary venules (22) and had not yet invaded the brain parenchyma. However, this is consistent with invasion of the brain, since upon arrest in capillaries, *C. neoformans* quickly crosses endothelial barriers (19) and possibly the blood-brain barrier. These experiments showed that after intranasal infection, the pathogenic strains of *C. neoformans* and *C. gattii* had disseminated to the mouse brain in as little as 3 h.

To confirm the presence of yeast in the brain, we performed immunofluorescence in skulls of infected mice, using a monoclonal antibody against *C. neoformans* capsular GXM (23). In agreement with the results of CFU quantification, we detected yeast cells (positive immunostaining results and typical morphology) in the mouse brain at 24 h postinfection (Fig. 3A, inset). We wondered if it were possible for *C. neoformans* to cause damage to the nose mucosa to access the brain, conceivably by accessing the host bloodstream or, alternatively, by using the olfactory nerves to traverse the cribriform plate (as shown for bacterial pathogens [24, 25]) or if after damage the mucosa access the host bloodstream for dissemination. We reasoned that if dissemination occurred through the olfactory system, then the olfactory bulb would contain the majority of yeasts compared to the remainder of the brain. We infected mice and separated their olfactory bulb from the remainder of the brain (Fig. 3B). We found that the olfactory bulb contained amounts of yeasts similar to those present in the remainder of the brain, despite its small size compared to the rest of the brain.

To investigate the interaction of *C. neoformans* with the nose, and possible damage to the nose mucosa that could facilitate dissemination, we performed histological studies using a combination of histology, immunofluorescence, and Grocott methenamine silver and mucicarmine staining (Fig. 4). We found yeasts scattered throughout
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 3** C. neoformans is detected in the brain and the olfactory bulb as early as 3 h postinfection (hpi) after i.n. infection. (A) Mice were infected with $5 \times 10^5$ CFU of C. neoformans via intranasal instillation, euthanized at the indicated time, and processed for histology. Yeast cells could be observed in the olfactory bulb of the brain of mice at 24 hpi (top panel, arrows). Noninfected animals were processed under the same conditions to show specificity of staining of yeast capsular immunofluorescence (bottom panel). (B) Mice were infected with high dose of C. neoformans. At the indicated time postinfection, the olfactory bulb was separated from the remainder of the brain (illustrated in the right panel) and CFU were counted (left panel). Each data point represents one individual mouse, and bars represent means and SD. Numbers represent *P* values calculated from two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli, with *q* = 5%.</figcaption></figure>

the upper respiratory tract, particularly in the turbinates of the nose, and some yeasts close to the cribriform plate (Fig. 4A to C), as well as in the ear canals of mice (Fig. 4D). Yeasts were abundant in airways, surrounded with a material that likely represented mucus secretions from the host but that stained abundantly with capsular GXM antibody, indicating a component of secreted polysaccharide in the airways (Fig. 4B). Budding forms rested on the respiratory epithelium cilia and the olfactory epithelium layer, yeast numbers increased from 3 h to 24 h postinfection, and immunostaining of GXM increased (Fig. 4F). We noted that at 24 h postinfection there were rare enlarged yeast cells within the nose turbinates and ears (Fig. 4C to G) whose cell body diameter was above 10 µm and that can therefore be considered titan cells (26–28). The finding of titan cells in the nose of mice is concordant with results reported previously by Lima and Vital (29), who found enlarged cells in noses of guinea pigs after some days of infection. Histopathology analysis detected no damage to the host epithelial layers as well as no inflammatory infiltrate from 3 h to 24 h postinfection; it seems that either yeasts go undetected or they do not cause enough tissue damage to trigger inflammation in the murine host in the early stages of infection. We conclude that, up to 24 h postinfection, the presence of C. neoformans in nose of mice results in minimal (if any) damage to nose mucosa and that the nose shows no sign of inflammation at this stage of infection.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**FIG 4** Histopathology of mouse nasal cavities upon *C. neoformans* infection. Colonization and secretion of GXM in airways of mice was examined. Enlarged yeasts could be observed in airways and in ears. Mice were infected with 5 × 10⁵ CFU of strain H99E or strain H99O (as indicated) of *C. neoformans* via intranasal instillation, euthanized at the indicated time, and processed for histology. Immunofluorescence staining of medial sagittal cuts of mouse skulls was performed after staining with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) nuclear counterstain and anti-GXM-monoclonal antibody 18B7. (A) Aspects of the cribriform plate and the nose turbinates showing yeasts in the airway at 3 h postinfection. (B) Accumulation of GXM in the nose mucosa at 24 h postinfection. Specificity of staining was confirmed by performing immunostaining in a noninfected mouse (not shown). (C) Grocott methenamine silver staining results for H99E (first panel) and H99O (second panel) and immunofluorescence results for H99O (stacked third and fourth panels and fifth panel) showing enlarged yeast cells in nose airways (arrowheads). (D) Grocott methenamine silver staining showing abundant yeasts and enlarged yeast cells in auditory canal (arrowhead). Bars, 25 µm. (E) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of entire skull (3 h postinfection). (F) Quantification of yeasts in airways (Lumen) and yeasts in nose mucosa. Yeasts were scored via observation from three histological levels from infected mice. (G) Aspect of nose mucosa, close to cribriform plate (24 h postinfection), displaying lack of inflammation and enlarged yeast cells (inset).</figcaption></figure>

DISCUSSION

Animal models of infection are critical tools for understanding the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. In the cryptococcal field, mice represent the mammalian species most commonly used to study pathogenesis and immune responses. We compared the kinetics of brain dissemination in the three models of cryptococcal infection that are commonly used, namely, i.v., i.n. and i.t. We were particularly interested in i.n. infection since this approach has become increasingly popular in the field. We found early dissemination to the brain and colonization of upper respiratory tract by *C. neoformans* and *C. gattii*. Our data suggest early invasion of the brain and colonization of the nose by cryptococcal species in mouse models.

The quick dissemination to the brain observed in our mouse model is compatible
with an hematogenous route of dissemination. Recent work has proposed that escape
from the lungs occurs due to phagocyte drainage through the lymphatic system (30).
It has not yet been shown how C. neoformans escapes from the lymph nodes into the
bloodstream (15, 16, 31), but this will likely be elucidated in the future. We detected no
yeasts in the circulating blood of mice, which raises the issue of how the bloodstream
is so quickly invaded and quickly cleared. Other groups observed that in i.v. infection,
fungi are cleared from the bloodstream within hours or by the day after infection (22,
31), with fungemia resurfacing only very late in the infection. Those observations,
together with ours, imply that yeast transit time in blood is very short (20). The short
transit time is seemingly due to arrest of yeasts within small capillaries, as can occur in
the ears of mice (19) and in the lumen of leptomeningeal capillaries (19, 22). Indeed, our
experiments would detect yeast arrested in brain capillaries as yeasts infecting the
brain. In contrast with observations detecting a short transit time, others found that
blood contains both free yeast cells and yeast cells in the buffy coat, i.e., engulfed by
phagocytic immune cells, for up to 20 days postinoculation. Depletion of mononuclear
phagocytes decreases the number of yeasts detected in the brain since it prevents
Trojan-horse transport (18, 21, 30, 31). Regardless of the duration of transit time, there
is sufficient experimental evidence to support the idea that dissemination to the brain
occurs via the hematogenous route, by direct crossing of the blood-brain barrier by free
yeast cells, and by indirect carriage within host mononuclear phagocytes (Trojan horse
transport).

In models of intravenous (i.v.) inoculation, yeast dissemination to the brain occurs as early as 90 min after inoculation (15, 32). The speed of *C. neoformans* dissemination to the brain was attributed to the intravenous inoculation model, which can simulate fungemia, an event that occurs very late in natural infections. Our findings confirm that i.v. infection disseminated more efficiently to the brain but that all of the infection routes lad to the presence of viable yeasts within the brain as early as 3 h postinfection. Others detected yeasts in the brain as early as 3 days after intranasal infection (33). We did not experimentally confirm that the same quick dissemination to the brain occurs with intratracheal infection, but we expect the intratracheal route of infection to be similar to the intranasal route with respect to the rate of dissemination for 2 reasons: (i) at day 3, the fungal burdens were similar for the two routes; (ii) due to sneezing (and possibly coughing reflexes), inoculation into the trachea would quickly spread *C. neoformans* throughout the upper respiratory tract. It is our view that once the lungs are infected, the entire upper respiratory tract becomes infected. Therefore, we believe that brain dissemination occurs very rapidly and possibly in a matter of hours, irrespective of the infection route used. This finding and related findings reported previously by others (30, 33) establish that cryptococcal brain dissemination occurs early (in a matter of few hours) and simultaneously with lung infection.

After noting the early dissemination after intranasal inoculation, we wondered if a
route of dissemination through a nasal olfactory system could be used by C. neofor-
mans. Both *Burkholderia pseudomallei* and *Listeria monocytogenes* can reach the brain
via damaging the olfactory mucosa and travelling upward through the olfactory nerve
tracts as well as other cranial nerves (24, 25). *Neisseria meningitidis* invades mouse
brains by damaging the olfactory epithelium and travelling along the olfactory tract,
through the cribriform plate, to invade the brain (34). The filamentous fungus *Mucor*
invades the facial blood vessels from the sinus to reach the eye, the cranial nerves, and
the brain. In the case of *C. neoformans*, the possibility of brain dissemination through
the nose was investigated previously (35). In mice, yeast cells were observed along the
olfactory nerve and the meninges starting at day 3 after intranasal instillation (35). Our
study differed from that previous study in that we focused on the earliest stages of
infection and found no evidence of an upward movement that would result in invasion
of the brain. We observed no signs of mucosal damage and no inflammation in the
nose cavity, despite the presence of abundant amounts of yeasts and secreted GXM. In
interpreting these results, we relied on the terminology of the damage-response
framework, which defines infection as the acquisition of the microbe by the host and
colonization as a state where the damage resulting from the host-microbe interaction
is insufficient to affect homeostasis (36). From this perspective, the lack of visible
damage suggests that infection leads merely to nasal colonization and not to overt
disease. Given the lack of damage and inflammatory infiltrate, our findings do not
support the notion that invasion of nasal structures is involved in dissemination of C.
*neoformans*. Nevertheless, intranasal inoculation results in nasal colonization, where
fungal cells may later interact with local immune defenses and potentially affect the
development of the immune response.

Animal models have shown that some animals can harbor C. neoformans in nose for extended periods of time. Intranasal instillation resulted in the presence of yeast cells detected in the nasal cavities for periods up to 1 month of both mice and rats (37), and the amounts of yeast cells associated with such infection are large enough to be detected by whole-animal noninvasive imaging as early as 1.5 weeks after infection (33). In immunocompetent laboratory mice infected intranasally, yeasts can be detected up to 90 days after instillation (38), and guinea pigs carried C. neoformans in nose for several weeks (29). Some strains of C. neoformans are rhinotropic, with the onset of nasal lesions occurring very late in the disease in laboratory-infected mice (39). Further, C. neoformans is frequently detected in nose of animals outside the laboratory setting. Asymptomatic nasal carriage of C. neoformans has been reported in cats, dogs, and koalas (40, 41). The proportion of positive-testing animals can reach as high as 95%, as reported for feral cats in Italy (42). C. gattii infections are also quite frequent in animals, with studies performed in the British Columbia region reporting positive nasal swab results in 4% and 7% of the cat and dog populations, respectively (43). In conclusion, there is evidence that C. neoformans can survive and even colonize the upper respiratory tract in some felines and rodents, including mice, a common experimental model. This frequent colonization is associated with disease since cryptococcosis is infrequent in species such as cats (44) but is relatively prevalent in koalas (41). Frequent detection of C. neoformans in wild animals and prolonged detection of C. neoformans in noses of laboratory animals show that C. neoformans (and perhaps other Cryptococcus species) colonizes the upper airways of animals.

Serological studies have indicated that humans are exposed to C. neoformans at an
early age (7) and that C. neoformans can reside in the lungs in a latent form (9).
Nonpathogenic species of *Cryptococcus* spp. were identified in several body sites:
healthy scalps (45), in mouths of 20% of the healthy population (46), in skin of children
(47), and in breast milk (48). Examination of lung transplant patients or bronchiectasis
patients frequently detects the presence of *Cryptococcus* but no pathogenic species (49,
50). Indeed, pathogenic species of *Cryptococcus* spp. are rarely found in microbiome
studies. The majority of studies in nose and upper respiratory tract (51–56) reported no
*Cryptococcus* sp. isolates from nasal cultures, while one study found rare *Cryptococcus*
spp. (and no C. neoformans) by culturing nasal cavity lavages (57). There is one notable
exception: high-throughput sequencing identified *Cryptococcus neoformans* as the
most abundant fungal species in the middle meatus in 60% of healthy patients and
90% of chronic rhinosinusitis patients in St. Louis, MO, USA (58). The explanation for this
striking exception is unknown and may represent a technical problem. Overall, C.
*neoformans* is rarely recovered from healthy humans. In contrast, C. neoformans is
frequently isolated from upper respiratory tract of some felines. This discrepancy is
likely due to a combination of increased exposure of animals to environmental
reservoirs of C. neoformans and immunological differences in host species. How-
ever, this is a surprising finding, since animal disease has so far recapitulated human
disease (13, 15, 59).

In summary, our study showed colonization of the upper respiratory tract by C.
*neoformans* in mouse models together with rapid dissemination to the brain, indepen-
dently of the infection route. The rapid appearance of yeast cells in the different body
compartments where they initiate local immune responses suggests caution in asso-
ciating a particular systemic response with a specific tissue. At the very least, our
findings suggest the need to revisit long-held views on cryptococcal pathogenesis in animal models of infection using the most modern cellular and immunological tools.

## MATERIALS AND METHODS

C. neoformans was grown from frozen glycerol stocks on a yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) plate for 2 days and then cultured overnight at 30°C in YPD broth with shaking. We used a strain from the H99E lineage (available from the Jennifer K. Lodge laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO), the H99O strain, a close relative of the original isolate of H99 (60), and the R265 strain of C. gattii, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection.

C57BL/6J mice, aged 8 to 10 weeks, were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and infected with the indicated 5 × 10³ (low dose) or 5 × 10⁵ CFU (high dose) inoculum in a final volume of 40 µl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (61). Intravenous (i.v.) injections were performed by injection of 40 µl into the retroorbital sinus of the animal under isoflurane anesthesia. Intranasal (i.n.) experiments were performed by placing 40 µl of yeast suspension into the mouse nares with the mouse under isoflurane anesthesia (62). Intratracheal (i.t.) infections were performed with the mouse under xylazine-ketamine anesthesia. The neck of the animal was exposed, the trachea was exposed via midline incision, and yeasts were inoculated with a 25-gauge syringe directly into the trachea. The incision was closed with Vetbond (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). Mice were monitored daily for signs of stress and deterioration of health throughout the experiment. All animal experiments were approved by the Johns Hopkins University IACUC under protocol MO18H152.

To measure fungal burden, mice were euthanized and exsanguinated via terminal retroorbital bleeding and tissues were removed and macerated by passage through a 100-µm-pore-size mesh into sterile PBS. The tissue homogenate was then plated into YPD agar plates, and CFU levels were quantified. For one experiment, to remove possible yeast contaminations from the exterior surface of the brain during necropsy, we rinsed the brains. In one experiment, we included a noninfected (sentinel) mouse to test for accidental contamination of tools and materials during necropsy.

For histological analysis of the skull, the skin, lower jaw, and tongue were removed and the remainder of the skull was fixed in Formaldehyde and processed for routine histology. A sagittal cut was performed through the middle section of the mouse skull, and consecutive 4-µm-thick sections were cut at 40-µm intervals for hematoxylin-eosin, mucicarmine, Grocott methenamine silver, and immunofluorescence staining. For immunofluorescence analyses, 18B7 monoclonal antibody against capsular polysaccharides (23) was added and was then detected with anti-mouse IgG₁-Alexa 488 conjugate antibody. Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin were scanned using a slide scanner at the Oncology Tissue Services Core of the School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University. The remaining sections were imaged using an Olympus AX70 microscope (Olympus America, NY, USA). Image cropping and annotation were performed using ImageJ (63).

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Oncology Tissue Services of Johns Hopkins University for the histology and use of Tissue Scanner facilities. We thank the Johns Hopkins Phenotyping Core and Cory Brayton for the histopathological analysis.

A.C. was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) award 5R01HL059842. E.C. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute.

## REFERENCES

1. Hagen F, Khayhan K, Theelen B, Kolecka A, Polacheck I, Sionov E, Falk R, Parnmen S, Lumbsch HT, Boekhout T. 2015. Recognition of seven species in the *Cryptococcus gattii/* *Cryptococcus neoformans* species complex. *Fungal Genet Biol* 78:16–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.009.

2. Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE, Wickes BL, Meyer W, Cuomo CA, Wollenburg KR, Bicanic TA, Castañeda E, Chang YC, Chen J, Cogliati M, Dromer F, Ellis D, Filler SG, Fisher MC, Harrison TS, Holland SM, Kohno S, Kronstad JW, Lazera M, Levitz SM, Lionakis MS, May RC, Ngamskulrongroj P, Pappas PG, Perfect JR, Rickerts V, Sorrell TC, Walsh TJ, Williamson PR, Xu J, Zelazny AM, Casadevall A. 2017. The case for adopting the “species complex” nomenclature for the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. mSphere 2:e00357-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00357-16.

3. Bartlett KH, Cheng P-Y, Duncan C, Galanis E, Hoang L, Kidd S, Lee M-K, Lester S, MacDougall L, Mak S, Morshed M, Taylor M, Kronstad J. 2012. A decade of experience: *Cryptococcus gattii* in British Columbia. Mycopathologia 173:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-011-9475-x.

4. Baker RD, Haugen RK. 1955. Tissue changes and tissue diagnosis in cryptococcosis; a study of 26 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 25:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/25.1.14.

5. Chen LC, Goldman DL, Doering TL, Pirofski LA, Casadevall A. 1999. Antibody response to *Cryptococcus neoformans* proteins in rodents and humans. *Infect Immun* 67:2218–2224.

6. Muchmore HG, Felton FG, Salvin SB, Rhoades ER. 1968. Delayed hypersensitivity to cryptococcin in man. Sabouraudia 6:285–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00362176885190561.

7. Goldman DL, Khine H, Abadi J, Lindenberg DJ, Pirofski L, Niang R, Casadevall A. 2001. Serologic evidence for *Cryptococcus neoformans* infection in early childhood. Pediatrics 107:E66. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.5.e66.

8. Abadi J, Pirofski LA. 1999. Antibodies reactive with the cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide glucuronoxylomannan are present in sera from children with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis 180:915–919. https://doi.org/10.1086/314953.

9. Dromer F, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Fontanet A, Ronin O, Dupont B, Lortholary O, French Cryptococcosis Study Group. 2004. Epidemiology of HIV-associated cryptococcosis in France (1985–2001): comparison of the pre- and post-HAART eras. AIDS 18:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200402200-00024.

10. Henao-Martínez AF, Beckham JD. 2015. Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis 28:300–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000171.
11. Singh N, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Gupta KL, John GT, del Busto R, Klintmalm GB, Somani J, Lyon GM, Pursell K, Stosor V, Munoz P, Limaye AP, Kalil AC, Pruett TL, Garcia-Diaz J, Humar A, Houston S, House AA, Wray D, Orloff S, Dowdy LA, Fisher RA, Heitman J, Wagener MM, Husain S. 2008. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: clinical relevance of serum cryptococcal antigen. Clin Infect Dis 46:e12-e18. https://doi.org/10.1086/524738.

12. Baddley JW, Schain DC, Gupte AA, Lodhi SA, Kayler LK, Frade JP, Lockhart SR, Chiller T, Bynon JSJ, Bower WA. 2011. Transmission of *Cryptococcus neoformans* by organ transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 52:E94-E98. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq216.

13. Mukaremera L, McDonald TR, Nielsen JN, Molenaar CJ, Akampurira A, Schutz C, Taseera K, Muzoora C, Meintjes G, Meya DB, Boulware DR, Nielsen K. 2019. The mouse inhalation model of *Cryptococcus neoformans* infection recapitulates strain virulence in humans and shows that closely related strains can possess differential virulence. Infect Immun 87:1694. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00046-19.

14. Goldman DL, Lee SC, Mednick AJ, Montella L, Casadevall A. 2000. Persistent *Cryptococcus neoformans* pulmonary infection in the rat is associated with intracellular parasitism, decreased inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, and altered antibody responsiveness to cryptococcal polysaccharide. Infect Immun 68:832-838. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.2.832-838.2000.

15. Chrétien F, Lortholary O, Kansau I, Neuville S, Gray F, Dromer F. 2002. Pathogenesis of cerebral *Cryptococcus neoformans* infection after fungemia. J Infect Dis 186:522-530. https://doi.org/10.1086/341564.

16. Lortholary O, Improvisi L, Nicolas M, Provost F, Dupont B, Dromer F. 1999. Fungemia during murine cryptococcosis sheds some light on pathophysiology. Med Mycol 37:169-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1365-280X.1999.00215.x.

17. Alanio A, Desnos-Ollivier M, Dromer F. 2011. Dynamics of *Cryptococcus neoformans*-macrophage interactions reveal that fungal background influences outcome during cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in humans. mBio 2:e00158-11. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00158-11.

18. Santiago-Tirado FH, Onken MD, Cooper JA, Klein RS, Doering TL. 2017. Trojan horse transit contributes to blood-brain barrier crossing of a eukaryotic pathogen. mBio 8:e02183-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02183-16.

19. Shi M, Li SS, Zheng C, Jones GJ, Kim KS, Zhou H, Kubes P, Mody CH. 2010. Real-time imaging of trapping and urease-dependent transmigration of *Cryptococcus neoformans* in mouse brain. J Clin Invest 120:1683-1693. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI14963.

20. Shi M, Colarusso P, Calaruso P, Mody CH. 2012. Real-time in vivo imaging of fungal migration to the central nervous system. Cell Microbiol 14: 1819-1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12027.

21. Sorrell TC, Juillard P-G, Djordjevic JT, Kaufman-Franks K, Dietmann A, Milonig A, Combes V, Grau G. 2016. Cryptococcal transmigration across a model brain blood-barrier: evidence of the Trojan horse mechanism and differences between *Cryptococcus neoformans* var. grubii strain H99 and *Cryptococcus gattii* strain R265. Microbes Infect 18:57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2015.08.017.

22. Kaufman-Franks K, Djordjevic JT, Juillard P-G, Lev S, Desmarini D, Grau GER, Sorrell TC. 2018. The early innate immune response to, and phagocyte-dependent entry of, *Cryptococcus neoformans* map to the perivascular space of cortical post-capillary venules in neurocryptococcosis. Am J Pathol 188:1653-1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.03.015.

23. Casadevall A, Cleare W, Feldmesser M, Glatman-Freedman A, Goldman DL, Kozel TR, Lendvai N, Mukherjee J, Pirofski LA, Rivera J, Rosas AL, Scharff MD, Valadon P, Westin K, Zhong Z. 1998. Characterization of a murine monoclonal antibody to *Cryptococcus neoformans* polysaccharide that is a candidate for human therapeutic studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42: 1437-1446. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.42.6.1437.

24. St John JA, Ekberg JAK, Dando SJ, Meedeniya ACB, Horton RE,atzloff M, Owen SJ, Holt S, Peak IR, Ulett GC, Mackay-Sim A, Beacham IR. 2014. Burkholderia pseudomallei penetrates the brain via destruction of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves: implications for the pathogenesis of neurological melioidosis. mBio 5:e00025. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00025-14.

25. Pägelow D, Chhatbar C, Beineke A, Liu X, Nerlich A, van Vorst K, Rohde M, Kalinke U, Förster R, Halle S, Valentin-Weigand P, Hornef MW, Fulde M. 2018. The olfactory epithelium as a port of entry in neonatal neurorolisteriosis. Nat Commun 9:4269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06668-2.

26. Hommel B, Mukaremera L, Cordero RJB, Coelho C, Desjardins CA, Sturny-Leclère A, Janbon G, Perfect JR, Fraser JA, Casadevall A, Cuomo CA, Dromer F, Nielsen K, Alanio A. 2018. Titan cells formation in *Cryptococcus neoformans* is finely tuned by environmental conditions and modulated by positive and negative genetic regulators. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006982.

27. Trevijano-Contador N, de Oliveira HC, Garcia-Rodas R, Rossi SA, Llorente I, Zaballos A, Janbon G, Ariño J, Zaragoza O. 2018. *Cryptococcus neoformans* can form Titan-like cells in vitro in response to multiple signals. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007007.

28. Dambuza IM, Drake T, Chapuis A, Zhou X, Correia J, Taylor-Smith L, LeGrave N, Rasmussen T, Fisher MC, Bicanic T, Harrison TS, Jaspars M, May RC, Brown GD, Yuecel R, Maccallum DM, Ballou ER. 2018. The *Cryptococcus neoformans* Titan cell is an inducible and regulated morphotype underlying pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 14:e1006978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006978.

29. Lima C, Vital JP. 1994. Olfactory mucosa response in guinea pigs following intranasal instillation with *Cryptococcus neoformans*. A histological and immunocytochemical study. Mycopathologia 126:65-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01146198.

30. Walsh NM, Botts MR, McDermott AJ, Ortiz SC, Wüthrich M, Klein B, Hull CM. 2019. Infectious particle identity determines dissemination and disease outcome for the inhaled human fungal pathogen *Cryptococcus*. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007777.

31. Charlier C, Nielsen K, Daou S, Brigitte M, Chrétien F, Dromer F. 2009. Evidence of a role for monocytes in dissemination and brain invasion by *Cryptococcus neoformans*. Infect Immun 77:120-127. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01065-08.

32. Neal LM, Xing E, Xu J, Kolbe JL, Osterholzer JJ, Segal BM, Williamson PR, Olszewski MA. 2017. CD4+ T cells orchestrate lethal immune pathology despite fungal clearance during *Cryptococcus neoformans* meningoencephalitis. mBio 8:169. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01415-17.

33. Vanherp L, Ristani A, Poelmans J, Hillen A, Lagrou K, Janbon G, Brock M, Himmelreich U, Vande Velde G. 2019. Sensitive bioluminescence imaging of fungal dissemination to the brain in mouse models of cryptococcosis. Dis Model Mech 12:dmm039123. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.039123.

34. Dando SJ, Mackay-Sim A, Norton R, Currie BJ, St John JA, Ekberg JAK,atzloff M, Ulett GC, Beacham IR. 2014. Pathogens penetrating the central nervous system: infection pathways and the cellular and molecular mechanisms of invasion. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:691-726. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00118-13.

35. Gomes NGL, Boni M, Primo CC. 1997. The invasive behaviour of *Cryptococcus neoformans*: a possibility of direct access to the central nervous system? Mycopathologia 140:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006809522931.

36. Pirofski L-A, Casadevall A. 2017. Immune-mediated damage completes the parabola: *Cryptococcus neoformans* pathogenesis can reflect the outcome of a weak or strong immune response. mBio 8:e02063-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02063-17.

37. Kuttin ES, Feldman M, Nyska A, Weissman BA, Müller J, Levine HB. 1988. Cryptococcosis of the nasopharynx in mice and rats. Mycopathologia 101:99-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00452894.

38. Anderson DA, Sagha HM. 1988. Persistence of infection in mice inoculated intranasally with *Cryptococcus neoformans*. Mycopathologia 104: 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437432.

39. Dixon DM, Polak A. 1986. In vivo and in vitro studies with an atypical, rhinotropic isolate of *Cryptococcus neoformans*. Mycopathologia 96: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00467683.

40. Malik R, Wigney DI, Muir DB, Love DN. 1997. Asymptomatic carriage of *Cryptococcus neoformans* in the nasal cavity of dogs and cats. Med Mycol 35:27-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681219780000831.

41. Kido N, Makimura K, Kamegaya C, Shindo I, Shibata E, Omiya T, Yamamoto Y. 2012. Long-term surveillance and treatment of subclinical cryptococcosis and nasal colonization by *Cryptococcus neoformans* and *C. gattii* species complex in captive koalas (*Phascolarctos cinereus*). Med Mycol 50:291-298. https://doi.org/10.3109/13693786.2011.594967.

42. Danesi P, Furnari C, Granato A, Schivo A, Otranto D, Capelli G, Cafarchia C. 2014. Molecular identity and prevalence of *Cryptococcus* spp. nasal carriage in asymptomatic feral cats in Italy. Med Mycol 52:667-673. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myu030.

43. Duncan C, Stephen C, Lester S, Bartlett KH. 2005. Sub-clinical infection and asymptomatic carriage of *Cryptococcus gattii* in dogs and cats
during an outbreak of cryptococcosis. Med Mycol 43:511-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780500036019.

44. Pennisi MG, Hartmann K, Lloret A, Ferrer L, Addie D, Belák S, Boucraut-Baralon C, Egberink H, Frymus T, Gruffydd-Jones T, Hosie MJ, Lutz H, Marsilio F, Möstl K, Radford AD, Thiry E, Truyen U, Horzinek MC. 2013. Cryptococcosis in cats. J Feline Med Surg 15:611-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13489224.

45. Park HK, Ha M-H, Park S-G, Kim MN, Kim BJ, Kim W. 2012. Characterization of the fungal microbiota (mycobiome) in healthy and dandruff-afflicted human scalps. PLoS One 7:e32847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032847.

46. Ghannoum MA, Jurevic RJ, Mukherjee PK, Cui F, Sikaroodi M, Naqvi A, Gillevet PM. 2010. Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000713.

47. Jo J-H, Deming C, Kennedy EA, Conlan S, Polley EC, Ng W-I, Segre JA, Kong HH. 2016. Diverse human skin fungal communities in children converge in adulthood. J Invest Dermatol 136:2356-2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.05.130.

48. Boix-Amorós A, Puente-Sánchez F, Toit Du E, Linderborg KM, Zhang Y, Yang B, Salminen S, Isolauri E, Tamames J, Mira A, Collado MC. 2019. Mycobiome profiles in breast milk from healthy women depend on mode of delivery, geographic location, and interaction with bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02994-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02994-18.

49. Charlson ES, Diamond JM, Bittinger K, Fitzgerald AS, Yadav A, Haas AR, Bushman FD, Collman RG. 2012. Lung-enriched organisms and aberrant bacterial and fungal respiratory microbiota after lung transplant. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186:536-545. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201204-0693OC.

50. Mac Aogáin M, Chandrasekaran R, Lim AYH, Low TB, Tan GL, Hassan T, Ong TH, Ng AHQ, Bertrand D, Koh JY, Pang SL, Lee ZY, Gwee XW, Martinus C, Sio YY, Matta SA, Chew FT, Keir HR, Connolly JE, Abisheganaden JA, Koh MS, Nagarajan N, Chalmers JD, Chotirmall SH. 2018. Immunological corollary of the pulmonary mycobiome in bronchiectasis: the CAMEB study. Eur Respir J 52:1800766. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00766-2018.

51. Cleland EJ, Bassiouni A, Bassioni A, Boase S, Dowd S, Vreugde S, Wormald P-J. 2014. The fungal microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis: richness, diversity, postoperative changes and patient outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4:259-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21297.

52. Ragab A, Clement P, Vincken W, Nolard N, Simones F. 2006. Fungal cultures of different parts of the upper and lower airways in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 44:19-25.

53. Braun H, Buzina W, Freudenschuss K, Beham A, Stammberger H. 2003. Eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis*: a common disorder in Europe? Laryngoscope 113:264-269. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200302000-00013.

54. Jain S, Das S, Gupta N, Malik JN. 2013. Frequency of fungal isolation and antifungal susceptibility pattern of the fungal isolates from nasal polyps of chronic rhinosinusitis patients at a tertiary care centre in north India. Med Mycol 51:164-169. https://doi.org/10.3109/13693786.2012.694486.

55. Chalermwatanachai T, Zhang N, Holtappels G, Bachert C. 2015. Association of mucosal organisms with patterns of inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis. PLoS One 10:e0136068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136068.

56. Jung WH, Croll D, Cho JH, Kim YR, Lee YW. 2015. Analysis of the nasal vestibule mycobiome in patients with allergic rhinitis. Mycoses 58: 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12296.

57. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, Homburger HA, Frigas E, Gaffey TA, Roberts GD. 1999. The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc 74:877-884. https://doi.org/10.4065/74.9.877.

58. Aurora R, Chatterjee D, Hentzleman J, Prasad G, Sindwani R, Sanford T. 2013. Contrasting the microbiomes from healthy volunteers and patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:1328-1338. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5465.

59. Goldman D, Lee SC, Casadevall A. 1994. Pathogenesis of pulmonary *Cryptococcus neoformans* infection in the rat. Infect Immun 62: 4755-4761.

60. Arras SDM, Ormerod KL, Erpf PE, Espinosa MI, Carpenter AC, Blundell RD, Stowasser SR, Schulz BL, Tanurdzic M, Fraser JA. 2017. Convergent microevolution of *Cryptococcus neoformans* hypervirulence in the laboratory and the clinic. Sci Rep 7:17918. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18106-2.

61. Rivera J, Mukherjee J, Weiss LM, Casadevall A. 2002. Antibody efficacy in murine pulmonary *Cryptococcus neoformans* infection: a role for nitric oxide. J Immunol 168:3419-3427. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3419.

62. Hommel B, Mukaremera L, Cordero RJB, Desjardins CA, Sturny-Leclère A, Perfect J, Fraser JA, Casadevall A, Cuomo CA, Dromer F, Nielsen K, Alanio A. 2017. Identification of environmental and genetic factors important for *Cryptococcus neoformans* titan cell formation using new in vitro inducing conditions. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/191668v1.

63. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.