# Multigene Phylogeny, Beauvericin Production and Bioactive Potential of Fusarium Strains Isolated in India

Shiwali Rana, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Laurent Dufossé

► To cite this version:

Shiwali Rana, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Laurent Dufossé. Multigene Phylogeny, Beauvericin Production and Bioactive Potential of Fusarium Strains Isolated in India. Journal of Fungi, 2022, 8 (7), 10.3390/jof8070662. [https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070662](https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070662)

HAL Id: hal-04148783

https://hal.science/hal-04148783

Submitted on 3 Jul 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Article

# Multigene Phylogeny, Beauvericin Production and Bioactive Potential of *Fusarium* Strains Isolated in India

Shiwali Rana <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> ID, Sanjay Kumar Singh <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,* ID and Laurent Dufossé <fnref n="3" />, ID*

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Rana, S.; Singh, S.K.; Dufossé, L. Multigene Phylogeny, Beauvericin Production and Bioactive Potential of *Fusarium* Strains Isolated in India. *J. Fungi* **2022**, *8*, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070662

Academic Editor: Ivan M. Dubovskiy

Received: 17 May 2022

Accepted: 21 June 2022

Published: 24 June 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** The taxonomy of the genus *Fusarium* has been in a *flux* because of ambiguous circumscription of species-level identification based on morphotaxonomic criteria. In this study, multigene phylogeny was conducted to resolve the evolutionary relationships of 88 Indian *Fusarium* isolates based on the internal transcribed spacer region, 28S large subunit, translation elongation factor 1-alpha, RNA polymerase second largest subunit, beta-tubulin and calmodulin gene regions. *Fusarium* species are well known to produce metabolites such as beauvericin (BEA) and enniatins. These identified isolates were subjected to fermentation in *Fusarium*-defined media for BEA production and tested using TLC, HPLC and HRMS. Among 88 isolates studied, 50 were capable of producing BEA, which varied from 0.01 to 15.82 mg/g of biomass. *Fusarium tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 showed maximum BEA production (15.82 mg/g of biomass). The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 showed promising antibacterial activity against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 and *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470 with MIC of 62.5 and 15.63 µg/mL, respectively. Similarly, the *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 extract in potato dextrose agar (40 µg/mL) exhibited antifungal activity in the food poison technique against plant pathogenic and other fungi, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744 and *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482, showing % inhibition of 84.31, 49.76, 38.22 and 35.13, respectively. The antibiotic effect was found to synergize when *Fusarium* extract and amphotericin B (20 µg/mL each in potato dextrose agar) were used in combination against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716, showing % inhibition of 50.35, 79.37, 48.07 and 76.72, respectively. The extract also showed satisfactory dose-dependent DPPH radical scavenging activity with an $IC_{50}$ value of 0.675 mg/mL. This study reveals the correct identity of the Indian *Fusarium* isolates based on multigene phylogeny and also throws light on BEA production potential, suggesting their possible applicability in the medicine, agriculture and industry.

**Keywords:** antimicrobial; fermentation; *Fusarium*; multilocus DNA sequencing; synergistic effect

## 1. Introduction

Members of the genus *Fusarium* are ubiquitous and found in soil, air and on plants [1]. *Fusarium* is an important group of plant-pathogenic fungi which affect a vast diversity of crops in all climatic zones across the globe [2]. Being a genus of great concern, accurate and correct identification of its species becomes a necessity. However, its taxonomy has been in flux due to ambiguous circumscription based on morphotaxonomic criteria. Over the past two decades, many phylogenetic studies have established that morphological species recognition frequently fails to distinguish many *Fusarium* species [3]. Phylogenetic studies have revealed that nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) is nearly useless for species-level recognition in the case of *Fusarium* and related genera; these markers are useful

<footnote n="1">¹ National Fungal Culture Collection of India, Biodiversity and Palaeobiology Group, MACS' Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune 411004, India; shiwalirana@aripune.org</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Faculty of Science, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind Road, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Chembiopro Chimie et Biotechnologie des Produits Naturels, ESIROI Département Agroalimentaire, Université de la Réunion, F-97490 Sainte-Clotilde, Ile de La Réunion, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: sksingh@aripune.org or singhsksingh@gmail.com (S.K.S.); laurent.dufosse@univ-reunion.fr (L.D.); Tel.: +91-20-2532-5103 (S.K.S.); +33-66-873-1906 (L.D.)</footnote>
only in the discrimination of *Fusarium* species complexes [4]. Discordance on using the nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) gene region is because of the highly divergent ITS2 rDNA xenologs or paralogs discovered in many species' complexes [5,6]. Many protein-coding genes have been explored for identification and taxonomic purposes in *Fusarium* and related genera. The two primary genes commonly used nowadays for identification that offer high discriminatory power and are well represented in public databases are translation elongation factor 1-alpha (*tef-1α*) and RNA polymerase second largest subunit (*rpb2*). *Tef1-α* is the most common marker, which has very good resolution power for most species [7], and *Rpb2* provides enhanced discrimination between closely related species [8–10]; however, PCR amplification and sequencing success rate is better for *Tef1-α* than for *Rpb2*. In multigene phylogenetic analyses, additional genetic markers are often used with the previously mentioned genes, including *β-tub*, *CaM* and *Rpb1*; these markers vary in resolution depending on species complexes [11].

*Fusarium* spp. are known to produce several secondary metabolites including beau-
vericin (BEA) and enniatins. BEA is a cyclic hexadepsipeptide that consists of alternating
D-2-hydroxyisovaleric acid and N-methylphenylalanine [12]. BEA is a potent bioactive
compound that exhibits very effective anticancer, cytotoxic, antiplatelet aggregation, an-
timicrobial, leishmanicidal and insecticidal activities [13]. These activities are primarily due
to its ionophoric properties that generally disrupt the normal physiological concentration
of cations across the plasma membrane [14–16]. It releases Ca²⁺ from internal Ca²⁺ stores
of the endoplasmic reticulum [17].

Studies prove that BEA can exhibit promising antibacterial activity against gram-
positive or gram-negative bacteria, for example, *Agrobacterium tumefaciens*, *Bacillus cereus*,
*B. pumilus*, *B. sphaericus*, *B. subtilis*, *B. mycoides*, *Bifidobacterium adolescentis*, *Clostridium*
*perfringens*, *Escherichia coli*, *Eubacterium biforme*, *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*, *Paenibacillus*
*azotofixans*, *P. alvei*, *P. pulvifaciens*, *P. validus P. macquariensis*, *Peptostreptococcus productus*,
*P. anaerobius*, *Pseudomonas lachrymans*, *Salmonella typhimurium*, *Staphylococcus haemolyticus*,
*Vibrio fisheri* and *Xanthomonas vesicatoria* are inhibited by BEA [18–23].

There has been public concern about certain opportunistic fungi that can cause in-
fections; particularly, cases of *Candida albicans* are greater than before. Patients with
compromised immune systems, such as those receiving organ transplants and cancer
chemotherapy or those infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), are more prone
to such opportunistic infections [24]. BEA alone does not exhibit any antifungal activity;
however, it has been found to enhance miconazole activity against *C. albicans* (wild and
fluconazole-resistant) [25]. The activity of azole antifungals becomes enhanced against
azole-resistant *Candida* isolates by BEA via inhibition of multidrug efflux [26]. The BEA
with ketoconazole is known to synergize the antifungal effect against *Candida albicans* and *C.
tropicalis*, signifying BEA's possible use as a co-drug for antifungal infections [23,27,28]. A
promising strategy using BEA, which involves simultaneous targeting drug resistance and
morphogenesis, can boost antifungal efficacy against human fungal pathogens to combat
life-threatening fungal infections.

In this study, 88 isolates of *Fusarium* and related genera from various substrates were identified by multigene phylogeny based on the internal transcribed spacer region, translation elongation factor 1-alpha, 28S large subunit, RNA polymerase second largest subunit, beta-tubulin and calmodulin gene regions. Further, these isolates were screened for beauvericin production. The isolate which showed maximum BEA production was subjected to large-scale fermentation, and its extract was used to study antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant potential.

**2. Materials and Methods**

2.1. *Isolates and Fungarium Specimens*

First, 64 fungal strains identified as *Fusarium* based on morphology were procured
from the National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI-WDCM 932) Table 1. The
bacterial isolates used in this study, *Escherichia coli* MTCC 739, *Bacillus subtilis* MTCC 121,
*Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470, *Raoultella planticola* MTCC 530, *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* MTCC 2453, *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 and *Staphylococcus aureus* MTCC 96, were procured from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC). Additionally, fungal pathogens *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482, *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716 were also procured from the National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI) to study the antifungal activity.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Sixty-four *Fusarium* isolates procured from the National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI), along with other details such as host, place of collection and date of isolation, are listed.</caption><thead><tr><td>NFCCI No.</td><td>Host</td><td>Place of Collection</td><td>Date of Isolation</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NFCCI 680</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Maharashtra</td><td>25 September 2006</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 681</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Maharashtra</td><td>20 December 2006</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 1127</td><td>Jatropha curcus (Phyloplane)</td><td>Durg, Chhattisgarh</td><td>23 May 2007</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 1788</td><td>Soil</td><td>Imphal, Manipur</td><td>23 June 2009</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 1895</td><td>Soil</td><td>Mahabaleshwar, Maharashtra</td><td>25 August 2009</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2053</td><td>Wilted Guava plant (Root)</td><td>Rajasthan</td><td>9 February 2010</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2150</td><td>Soil</td><td>Arctic Tundra</td><td>25 June 2010</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2315</td><td>Potato</td><td>Goa</td><td>15 June 2009</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2460</td><td>Zanthoxylum armatum</td><td>Udhampur, Jammu and Kashmir</td><td>13 June 2011</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2467</td><td>Bottle Gourd</td><td>Dapoli, Maharashtra</td><td>16 June 2011</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2470</td><td>Coconut leaves</td><td>Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala</td><td>22 June 2011</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2491</td><td>Soil</td><td>Bangalore, Karnataka</td><td>8 July 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2696</td><td>Coleus sp.</td><td>Puthenthope, Kerala</td><td>19 March 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2871</td><td>Wilted tomato plant (Root)</td><td>Manipur</td><td>25 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2872</td><td>Wilted tomato plant (Root)</td><td>Manipur</td><td>25 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2885</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Chandravati, Rajasthan</td><td>9 April 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2886</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Chikkamagaluru, Karnataka</td><td>15 July 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2904</td><td>Aegle marmelos</td><td>Karnataka</td><td>28 November 2009</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2945</td><td>Soil</td><td>Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu</td><td>7 January 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2946</td><td>Aegle marmelos</td><td>Karnataka</td><td>25 November 2010</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2949</td><td>Cotton field</td><td>Shirpur, Maharashtra</td><td>9 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2953</td><td>Cotton field</td><td>Shirpur, Maharashtra</td><td>6 August 2015</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2956</td><td>Cotton field</td><td>Shirpur, Maharashtra</td><td>19 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2959</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Amravati, Maharashtra</td><td>30 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2960</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Amravati, Maharashtra</td><td>30 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2961</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Beed, Maharashtra</td><td>26 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2962</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Kalamb, Osmanabad, Maharashtra</td><td>26 October 2011</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2964</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Latur, Maharashtra</td><td>30 August 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2972</td><td>Pigeon pea (Root)</td><td>Ahmednagar, Maharashtra</td><td>30 October 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3020</td><td>Soil</td><td>Karnataka</td><td>24 December 2010</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3031</td><td>Piper betle (Leaf-endophyte)</td><td>Tamil Nadu</td><td>26 December 2011</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3038</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Gujarat</td><td>24 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3044</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Gujarat</td><td>24 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3048</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Gujarat</td><td>24 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3049</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Gujarat</td><td>24 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3051</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Gujarat</td><td>24 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3065</td><td>Ocimum sanctum</td><td>Maharashtra</td><td>20 August 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3072</td><td>Barleria prionitis (Stem)</td><td>Maharashtra</td><td>24 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3074</td><td>Barleria prionitis</td><td>Maharashtra</td><td>20 September 2012</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1. Cont.**</caption><thead><tr><td>NFCCI No.</td><td>Host</td><td>Place of Collection</td><td>Date of Isolation</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NFCCI 3091</td><td>Textile sludge</td><td>Tamil Nadu</td><td>14 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3092</td><td>Textile sludge</td><td>Tamil Nadu</td><td>8 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3093</td><td>Textile sludge</td><td>Tamil Nadu</td><td>15 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3147</td><td>Rotten sugarcane</td><td>Dapoli, Maharashtra</td><td>5 January 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3239</td><td>Marigold (Seeds)</td><td>Mumbai, Maharashtra</td><td>8 February 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3243</td><td>Cow pea</td><td>Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala</td><td>20 June 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3264</td><td>Cow pea</td><td>Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala</td><td>12 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3270</td><td>Dead wood</td><td>Mumbai, Maharashtra</td><td>29 March 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3282</td><td>Soil</td><td>Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh</td><td>26 September 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3300</td><td><i>Cathranthus roseus</i></td><td>Raipur, Chhattisgarh</td><td>12 August 2012</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3475</td><td><i>Ocimum sanctum</i> (Endophyte)</td><td>Amaravati, Maharashtra</td><td>21 July 2013</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3703</td><td>Onion</td><td>Nanded, Maharashtra</td><td>14 September 2014</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3706</td><td><i>Castor</i> sp. (Root)</td><td>Aanand, Gujarat</td><td>20 December 2014</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4095</td><td>Soil</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>2 April 2014</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4180</td><td>Soil</td><td>Chandigarh</td><td>19 June 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4759</td><td><i>Anaphalis contorta</i> (Root-endophyte)</td><td>Imphal, Manipur</td><td>18 February 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4792</td><td>Chickpea (Root)</td><td>Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh</td><td>21 January 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4830</td><td>Cotton (Root)</td><td>Madurai, Tamil Nadu</td><td>5 September 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4859</td><td><i>Dillenia indica</i></td><td>Arunachal Pradesh</td><td>15 October 2016</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4885</td><td>Cucumber (Twig and leaf)</td><td>Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan</td><td>3 May 2020</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4888</td><td>Cucumber (Twig)</td><td>Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan</td><td>2 June 2020</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4889</td><td>Unknown insect</td><td>Vishakhapatnum Andhra Pradesh</td><td>30 October 2020</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4919</td><td>Soil</td><td>Pathanamthitta, Kerala</td><td>15 September 2020</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4963</td><td>Plant litter</td><td>Raiganj, Uttar dinajpur, West Bengal</td><td>25 March 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4972</td><td>Sugarcane bagasse</td><td>Dharur, Beed, Maharashtra</td><td>22 December 2020</td></tr></tbody></table>

## 2.2. Collection, Isolation and Morphological Identification

During the course of this study, *Fusarium* and other related fungi were isolated from various substrates collected from different regions of India. Table 2 enlists the 24 isolates which were isolated afresh in this study along with details of their host, place of collection, date of collection and date of isolation. Pure cultures of all 24 isolates were raised using a single spore isolation technique.

Colony characteristics of all *Fusarium* isolates were studied on multiple media, such as potato dextrose agar (PDA), malt extract agar (MEA), potato carrot agar (PCA), oatmeal agar (OMA), cornmeal agar (CMA) and synthetic nutrient agar (SNA). Microscopic structures of these isolates were observed using lactophenol-cotton blue under a Carl Zeiss Image Analyzer 2 (Germany) microscope. Measurements and photomicrographs of the fungal structures were recorded using Axiovision Rel 4.8 software and Digi-Cam with an attached Carl Zeiss Image Analyzer 2 microscope (Figures 1 and 2). The pure cultures are deposited and accessioned in the National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI 5189-5212) (Table 2).
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Twenty-four isolates isolated in this study along with their accession nos., host, place of collection, date of collection and date of isolation details.</caption><thead><tr><td>NFCCI No.</td><td>Host</td><td>Place of Collection</td><td>Date of Collection</td><td>Date of Isolation</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>NFCCI 5189</td><td>Soil</td><td>Haridwar, Uttarakhand</td><td>02 July 2018</td><td>12 July 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5190</td><td>Ginger</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>27 August 2017</td><td>8 September 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5191</td><td>Pomegranate</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>07 September 2019</td><td>15 September 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5192</td><td>Zingiber officinale</td><td>Aurangabad, Maharashtra</td><td>9 March 2017</td><td>10 March 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5193</td><td>Soil</td><td>Jalgaon, Maharashtra</td><td>10 October 2017</td><td>14 October 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5194</td><td>Forest litter</td><td>Mahabaleshwar, Maharashtra</td><td>12 October 2017</td><td>14 October 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5195</td><td>Soil</td><td>Chandigarh</td><td>1 April 2019</td><td>19 April 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5196</td><td>Wilted sugarcane plant</td><td>Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh</td><td>2 July 2021</td><td>17 July 2021</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5197</td><td>Chrysanthemum roseum</td><td>Mahabaleshwar, Maharashtra</td><td>25 September 2018</td><td>27 September 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5198</td><td>Soil</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>5 March 2020</td><td>16 March 2020</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5199</td><td>Soil</td><td>Jalgaon, Maharashtra</td><td>8 October 2017</td><td>14 October 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5200</td><td>Pea</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>15 April 2019</td><td>21 April 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5201</td><td>Dead bark</td><td>Simbal, Himachal Pradesh</td><td>14 December 2017</td><td>25 December 2017</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5202</td><td>Wilted Cashew plant</td><td>Pilcode, Kerala</td><td>6 August 2019</td><td>20 August 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5203</td><td>Rotten mushroom</td><td>Simbal, Himachal Pradesh</td><td>19 May 2019</td><td>25 May 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5204</td><td>Potato</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>28 December 2018</td><td>12 January 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5205</td><td>Aloe vera (Leaf)</td><td>Pune, Maharashtra</td><td>5 October 2019</td><td>16 October 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5206</td><td>Soil</td><td>Vadodara, Gujarat</td><td>3 October 2019</td><td>15 October 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5207</td><td>Coconut</td><td>Goa</td><td>15 October 2018</td><td>29 October 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5208</td><td>Zingiber officinale</td><td>Aurangabad, Maharashtra</td><td>5 October 2018</td><td>12 March 2018</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5209</td><td>Carrot rhizosphere</td><td>Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand</td><td>3 October 2019</td><td>7 October 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5210</td><td>Chilli (Fruit)</td><td>Simbal, Himachal Pradesh</td><td>5 February 2019</td><td>12 February 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5211</td><td>Damping-off Onion</td><td>Udaipur, Rajasthan</td><td>19 September 2019</td><td>27 September 2019</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5212</td><td>Grape (Leaf)</td><td>Nashik, Maharashtra</td><td>16 March 2020</td><td>17 April 2020</td></tr></tbody></table>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** *Fusarium* isolates with phialides bearing conidia (*a*,*b*) *Fusarium nirenbergiae* NFCCI 5189 (*c*,*d*) *Neocosmospora solani* NFCCI 2315 (*e*,*f*) *F. mangiferae* NFCCI 2885 (*g*,*h*) *F. annulatum* NFCCI 2962 (*i*,*j*) *F. microconidium* NFCCI 3020 (*k*,*l*) *F. sacchari* NFCCI 3147 (*m*,*n*) *N. oblonga* NFCCI 2150 (*o*,*p*) *Albonectria rigidiuscula* NFCCI 5202 (*q*,*r*) *F. irregulare* NFCCI 2460 (*s*,*t*) *Neocosmospora suttoniana* NFCCI 2961 (*u*,*v*) *F. annulatum* NFCCI 2964 (*w*,*x*) *Neocosmospora vasinfecta* NFCCI 2972. Scale bars: b, d, f, h, j, l, p, r, t, v, x = 20 µm; n = 10 µm.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** *Fusarium tardicrescens* (NFCCI 5201) culture grown on (a) Potato dextrose agar (b) Malt extract agar (c) Cornmeal agar (d–j) Phialides arising from mycelial hyphae producing micro and macroconidia (k) Micro and macroconidia. Scale bars: d, f, j = 20 µm; e, g, h, i, k = 10 µm.</figcaption></figure>

## 2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and DNA Sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from pure colonies of all 88 isolates growing on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) petri-plates, incubated for a week's time using a simple and rapid DNA extraction protocol using FastPrep®24 tissue homogenizer (MP Biomedicals GmbH, Eschwege, Germany) [29]. Partial gene sequences of isolates were determined for six gene markers, i.e., ITS, *tef1-α*, LSU, *rpb2*, *β-tub* and *CaM*. The primer sets used to amplify particular gene region are summarized in Table 3.
<table><caption>**Table 3.** PCR primer sets used in this study for amplification as well as sequencing.</caption><thead><tr><th>Name of the Gene Region</th><th>Primer</th><th>Direction</th><th>Sequence (5'-3')</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Internal transcribed spacer region of the nrDNA (ITS)</td><td>ITS-5</td><td>Forward</td><td>GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG</td><td>[30]</td></tr><tr><td>Translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α)</td><td>ITS-4</td><td>Reverse</td><td>TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC</td><td>[30]</td></tr><tr><td>28S large subunit of the nrDNA (LSU)</td><td>EF-1</td><td>Forward</td><td>ATGGGTAAGGARGACAAGAC</td><td>[31]</td></tr><tr><td>RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2)</td><td>EF-2</td><td>Reverse</td><td>GGARGTACCAGTSATCATG</td><td>[31]</td></tr><tr><td>Beta-tubulin (β-tub)</td><td>LR-OR</td><td>Forward</td><td>ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC</td><td>[32]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>LR-7</td><td>Reverse</td><td>TACTACCACCAAGATCT</td><td>[33]</td></tr><tr><td>RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2)</td><td>fRPB2-5f</td><td>Forward</td><td>GAYGAYMGWGATCAYTTYGG</td><td>[34]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>fRPB2-7cR</td><td>Reverse</td><td>CCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT</td><td>[34]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>βtuFFo1</td><td>Forward</td><td>CAGACCGGTCAGTGCGTAA</td><td>[35]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>βtuFRo1</td><td>Reverse</td><td>TTGGGGTCGAACATCTGCT</td><td>[35]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>CF-1</td><td>Forward</td><td>GCCGACTCTTTGACYGARGAR</td><td>[36]</td></tr><tr><td>Calmodulin (CaM)</td><td>CF-4</td><td>Reverse</td><td>TTTYTGCATCATRAGYTGGAC</td><td>[36]</td></tr></tbody></table>

PCR was carried out in a 25 µL reaction using 12.5 µL 2X Invitrogen Platinum SuperFi PCR Mastermix, 2 µL template DNA (10–20 ng), 1.5 µL 10 pmol primer, 5 µL 5X GC enhancer and H₂O (Sterile Ultra-Pure Water, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), with the volume made to 25 µL. The conditions of the thermo-cycling involved:

An initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 52 °C, 1 min at 72 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min for ITS gene region;

An initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 57 °C and 1 min at 72 °C followed by a final 7 min extension at 72 °C for Tef1-α;

5 min denaturation at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 50 s at 52 °C and 1.2 min at 72 °C with a final 8 min extension at 72 °C for LSU;

5 min denaturation at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 52 °C and 1.5 min at 72 °C with a final 10 min extension at 72 °C for Rpb2;

2 min denaturation at 94 °C, 40 cycles of 35 s at 94 °C, 55 s at 52 °C and 2 min at 72 °C with a final 10 min extension at 72 °C for β-tub;

An initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C and 2 min at 72 °C followed by a final 7 min extension at 72 °C for CaM.

The PCR amplicons were purified with a FavorPrep™ PCR purification kit as per the manufacturer's instructions. Purified PCR products of all marker genes were checked on 1.2% agarose electrophoresis gels stained with ethidium bromide and were further subjected to a sequencing PCR reaction using a BigDye®Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit, as per manufacturer's instructions.

The sequencing PCR reaction of 20 µL included 4 µL of 5× sequencing buffer, 2 µL of BigDye™ Terminator premix, 4 µL of primer (5 pmol), 4 µL of the purified amplicon and H₂O (Sterile Ultra-Pure Water, Sigma), with the volume made to 20 µL. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturing at 96 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s, 50 °C for 40 s and 60 °C for 4 min. The BigDye® terminators and salts were removed from using The BigDye Xterminator® Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. The purified sequencing products were transferred into a 96-well microplate. The sequence was elucidated on Applied Biosystems SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences obtained were submitted in the NCBI GenBank (accession numbers in Table S1).

## 2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

To determine the phylogenetic status of all 88 isolates, the Internal transcribed spacer region of the nrDNA (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), 28S large subunit of the nrDNA (LSU), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2), beta-tubulin (β-tub) and calmodulin (CaM) loci were used to compare the isolates used in this study with already known authentic strains in the genus Fusarium. The sequences of the type/reference strains
were retrieved from NCBI. A total of 186 isolates of *Fusarium* and related genera were used in the phylogenetic analysis (Table S1). *Atractium stilbaster* CBS 410.67 was selected as the outgroup taxon. The chosen strains used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree, along with their accession numbers and other related details, are listed in Table S1. Each gene region was individually aligned using MAFFT v. 6.864b [37]. The alignments were checked and adjusted manually using Aliview [38]. Further, alignments were concatenated and subjected to phylogenetic analyses. The best substitution model out of 286 DNA models was figured using ModelFinder [39]. Additionally, windows version IQ-tree tool v.1.6.11 [40] was used to construct the phylogenetic tree. The reliability of the tree branches was assessed and tested based on 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) support replicates and a SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-like aLRT) with 1000 replicates. The constructed phylogenetic tree was visualized in FigTree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 20 February 2022).

## 2.5. Fermentation for Beauvericin Production

*Fusarium* isolates were subcultured onto PDA and incubated at 25 °C for a week. Once the cultures were mature enough, spore suspensions were prepared separately for all isolates. Then, 10 µL of Tween 20 was added to 10 mL of normal saline (0.89%) and mixed adequately, saline solution was added to the culture and the spores were harvested carefully with the help of a sterile cotton swab and vortexed. The spore suspension's optical density (OD) was adjusted between 0.08 and 0.1 at 530 nm [41]. Next, 1 mL of this spore suspension was added to 100 mL of *Fusarium* defined media (FDM) (Sucrose 25 g, Sodium nitrate (NaNO₃) 4.25 g, Sodium chloride (NaCl) 5 g, Magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO₄·7H₂O) 2.5 g, Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH₂PO₄) 1.36 g, Ferrous sulphate heptahydrate (FeSO₄·7H₂O) 0.01 g, Zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO₄·7H₂O) 0.0029 g/L; pH 5.5) [42] in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and was incubated in a shaking incubator at 25 °C at 150 rpm for 7 days (Figure S1).

## 2.6. Extraction of Beauvericin

Beauvericin was extracted from the fermented broth as per the protocol described earlier, with slight modification [43]. The fermented broth was filtered using Whatman filter paper no. 4. Biomass was collected, washed twice with distilled water and was allowed to dry at 50 °C. Dried biomass was extracted overnight in 25 mL of acetonitrile:water 90:10 (v/v). Further, the mixture was sonicated twice for 15 min. The mixture was filtered; filtrate was extracted with 25 mL of heptane and separated using a separating funnel. The bottom layer was evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany). The dry residue was dissolved in 25 mL of methanol:water, 60:40 (v/v) and extracted twice with 25 mL of dichloromethane. The dichloromethane phase containing beauvericin (BEA) was collected and evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator. The evaporated extract containing beauvericin was dissolved in 1 mL of Acetonitrile.

## 2.7. Detection of Beauvericin

The presence of beauvericin was initially qualitatively analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and quantitatively by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In addition, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was carried out for a few samples for further confirmation.

### 2.7.1. Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

About 5 to 10 µL of the extracts were spotted onto TLC Silica gel plates (TLC Silica gel 60 F254; Merck life science Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India) along with standard Beauvericin (BEA) (500 mg/mL) (Sigma) with the help of glass capillary tube. TLC plates were developed in petroleum ether:ethyl acetate (1:1) as a solvent system. The plates were air-dried, and consequently, the spots formed on the TLC plates were detected using iodine vapours. Retention factor (Rf) values for the standard and extracts were measured as
described earlier [44,45]. The extracts were further subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

### 2.7.2. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The amount of BEA in the extracts was determined by HPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) using a C18 column and acetonitrile: H₂O (85:15 *v*/*v*) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min under isocratic conditions and U.V. detection at 210 nm [46]. A stock solution of standard beauvericin with a concentration of 1 mg/mL was prepared in acetonitrile and was further diluted to 15.6 µg/mL, 31.25 µg/mL, 62.5 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL, 250 µg/mL and 500 µg/mL. The retention time for BEA was found to be 9.1 min. The injection volume was 20 µL. The peak area was calibrated to the amount of BEA standard (Sigma). The amount of BEA produced was calculated with respect to the area under the peak.

### 2.7.3. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)

The mass of beauvericin was determined in selected extracts; high-resolution product ion spectra were acquired using ESI-UHR-Q-TOF (Bruker Impact II Ultra-High Resolution-TOF) to confirm the presence of Beauvericin. The system ionization source type was ESI with positive ion polarity. The instrument was run in the full-scan mode (m/z 150–1200). Nitrogen was used for drying (200 °C; 7 L/min), and the nebulizer gas pressure was 1.7 Bar. Other typical operating parameters were set as capillary voltage—4500 V, end plate offset—500 V, and charging voltage—2000 V.

## 2.8. Large Scale Fermentation and Extraction of Beauvericin from Fusarium tardiicrescens NFCCI 5201

Among the 88 tested isolates, the highest beauvericin producer, *F. tardiicrescens* NFCCI 5201, was subjected to flask scale fermentation in a total of 3.5 L of *Fusarium* defined medium (FDM). Each flask was inoculated with 1% spore suspension of O.D. 0.08–0.1, as described earlier in Section 2.5, and incubated at 25 °C with 150 rpm for one week. Extraction of beauvericin was carried out as described in Section 2.6. The final dry residue was dissolved in 36 mL of acetonitrile. This extract was used for further study.

## 2.9. Determination of the Antibacterial Activity

The *Fusarium tardiicrescens* NFCCI 5201 extract containing BEA dissolved in acetonitrile (500 µg/mL) was used to check antimicrobial activity. The antibacterial activity was tested against a panel of test organisms, including *Escherichia coli* MTCC 739, *Bacillus subtilis* MTCC 121, *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470, *Raoultella planticola* MTCC 530, *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* MTCC 2453, *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 and *Staphylococcus aureus* MTCC 96. Cultures were grown on nutrient agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, one to two pure colonies of each culture were transferred to 10 mL Muller hinton broth (MHB) and incubated for 4–5 h at 37 °C. Further, optical density was adjusted to 1 using broth. The cultures were diluted to a cell density of 1 × 10⁶ cells/mL. The test was carried out using a resazurin-based turbidometric assay in a 96-well microtiter plate. All wells of rows (A–G) were filled with 100 µL Muller hinton broth. The first well of each row was filled with 100 µL of *Fusarium tardiicrescens* NFCCI 5201 extract containing BEA (500 µg/mL), which was mixed well, and then 100 µL of the mixture from the first well was transferred to the second well of the vertical row. This serial dilution was continued until the tenth well; lastly, 100 µL of the mixture was discarded from the tenth well. The final concentration of the extract was half of the original concentration in each well. Ten µL of each bacterial suspension was added in vertical rows individually, except for the twelfth well (sterility control). One hundred µL of antibiotic ampicillin (10 µg/50 µL) was used, except *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* MTCC 2453, in which neomycin (30 µg/50 µL) was added in the eleventh well of each row (positive control). After 48 hrs of incubation at 37 °C, 25 µL of resazurin (0.01%) was added to all wells and incubated at 37 °C for 75 min in the
dark. Color changes were observed and recorded. The lowest concentration before the color change was considered as the minimum inhibitory concentration for that particular test organism [47,48].

## 2.10. Determination of the Individual and Combined Effect of Fusarium tardi rescens NFCCI 5201 Extract Containing Beauvericin and Amphotericin B on Pathogenic Fungi of Agricultural Importance

The antifungal potential of the individual and combined effect of *F. tardi rescens* NFCCI 5201 extract containing beauvericin and amphotericin B on agriculturally important pathogenic fungi was carried out using the poisoned food technique as described earlier [49]. Fungal pathogens *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482, *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716 were selected for the antifungal study. These pathogenic fungi were grown on PDA and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 5-7 days.

Agar discs with mycelia (5 mm in diameter) were cut out from the actively growing regions of the 5-7 days old pure cultures using a sterile cork borer and aseptically inoculated at the center of four different Petri plates, as follows:

1. Control plate containing PDA;

2. PDA supplemented with amphotericin B (40 µg/mL);

3. PDA supplemented with *F. tardi rescens* NFCCI 5201 extract containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL);

4. PDA supplemented with amphotericin B (20 µg/mL) and *F. tardi rescens* NFCCI 5201 extract containing beauvericin (20 µg/mL).

The growth of fungal colonies on different media was measured between 3 and 7 days depending upon the growth of fungi. Each treatment was repeated thrice, and the plates were incubated at 25 °C. The diameter of the fungal colony was measured after 3 and 7 days of incubation. The percentage inhibition of the mycelial growth of the test fungi was calculated using the formula described earlier [50]. Inhibition of mycelial growth (%) = ($dc-dt$)/$dc$ × 100, where dc is the mean diameter (in mm) of the colony in the control sample and dt is the diameter (in mm) of the colony in the treatment.

## 2.11. Antioxidant Activity of Extract of Fusarium tardi rescens NFCCI 5201 Containing Beauvericin

The extract was tested for in vitro antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method.

The concentration of the extract as well as standard solutions (control) glucose (Himedia) (negative) and ascorbic acid (Sigma) (positive) used were 1, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 mg/mL in acetonitrile. The extract or standard solution (10 µL) was added to DPPH in acetonitrile solution (200 µL, 100 µM) in a 96-well microtiter plate (Tarsons Products (P) Ltd., Kolkata, India). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the absorbance of each solution was determined at 517 nm using a Synergy HT Multi-detection microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

The radical scavenging activity was calculated by the following formula:

Radical scavenging activity (%) = (OD control - OD sample) / OD control × 100 [51,52]. Three replicates were maintained for each treatment.

# 3. Results

## 3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis

The nrDNA (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (*Tef1-α*), 28S large subunit of the nrDNA (LSU), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (*Rpb2*), beta-tubulin (*β-tub*) and calmodulin (*CaM*) loci sequence alignments were together used to confirm the resolution of the isolates used in this study. The concatenated file contained sequence data of 186 taxa. Alignment contained 6944 columns, 3815 distinct patterns, 2049 parsimony-informative, 950 singleton sites and 3944 constant sites. TIM2e + R4 was found to be the best-fit model
of 286 models tested and was chosen based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The phylogeny was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood Method based on the model mentioned above. The log-likelihood of the consensus tree was -59368.419. Rate parameters: A-C: 1.27988, A-G: 2.69656, A-T: 1.27988, C-G: 1.00000, C-T: 5.18110, G-T: 1.00000; Base frequencies: A: 0.250, C: 0.250, G: 0.250, T: 0.250; Site proportion and rates: (0.587, 0.115) (0.171, 1.101) (0.200, 2.369) (0.042, 6.470) (Figure 3).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3. *Cont.*</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Maximum-likelihood (IQ-TREE-ML) consensus tree inferred from the combined ITS, LSU, *Rpb2*, *β*-tub, *CaM* and *Tef-1α* multiple sequence alignment of genus *Fusarium* and related genera. Numbers at the branches indicate statistical support values (UFBS and SH-aLRT). The scale bar indicates expected changes per site. The tree is rooted to *Atractium stilbaster* (CBS 410.67). Isolates used in this study are shown in blue bold.</figcaption></figure>

Of the isolates, 88 were found to belong to *Fusarium* and related genera, i.e., *Albonectria* and *Neocosmospora*. Strains used in this study were found to represent 35 species, including *Albonectria rigidiuscula*, *Fusarium acutatum*, *F. annulatum*, *F. brachygibbosum*, *F. caatingaense*,
F. carminascens, F. commune, F. compactum, F. cugenangense, F. duoseptatum, F. fabacearum, F. glycines, F. gossypinum, F. grosmichelii, F. irregulare, F. lacertarum, F. lumajangense, F. mangiferae, F. microconidium, F. nanum, F. nirenbergiae, F. oxysporum, F. pernambucanum, F. proliferatum, F. sacchari, F. spinosum, F. sulawesiense, F. tardichlamydosporum, F. tardicrescens, F. verticillioides, Neocosmospora metavorans, N. oblonga, N. solani, N. suttoniana and N. vasinfecta.

Fusarium isolates were found to represent six species complexes. The species falling into a particular species complex are included in brackets, viz. Fusarium sambucinum species complex [F. brachygibbosum], Fusarium chlamydosporum species complex [F. microconidium, F. spinosum], Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex [F. caatingaense, F. compactum, F. irregulare, F. lacertarum, F. nanum, F. pernambucanum, F. sulawesiense], Fusarium oxysporum species complex [F. carminascens, F. cugenangense, F. duoseptatum, F. fabacearum, F. glycines, F. gossypinum, F. grosmichelii, F. nirenbergiae, F. oxysporum, F. tardichlamydosporum, F. tardicrescens], Fusarium nisikadoi species complex [F. commune] and Fusarium fujikuroi species complex [F. acutatum, F. annulatum, F. lumajangense, F. mangiferae, F. proliferatum, F. sacchari, F. verticillioides].

Interestingly, out of 35 species reported in this study, 17 species, Fusarium caatingaense, F. carminascens, F. compactum, F. cugenangense, F. duoseptatum, F. fabacearum, F. glycines, F. gossypinum, F. grosmichelii, F. lumajangense, F. microconidium, F. nanum, F. nirenbergiae, F. sulawesiense, F. tardichlamydosporum, F. tardicrescens, Neocosmospora oblonga and N. suttoniana, were found to be new records from India [53,54], most of them being reported for the first time from a new host in this study (Table 4).

<table><caption>**Table 4.** New records of *Fusarium* from India along with their host detail.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Identity</th><th colspan="3">This Study</th><th>Earlier Reports</th><th rowspan="2">Reference</th></tr><tr><th>NFCCI No.</th><th>Host</th><th>Host</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fusarium caatingaense</td><td>NFCCI 5191</td><td>Pomegranate</td><td>Dactylopius opuntiae</td><td></td><td>[55]</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium carminascens</td><td>NFCCI 5204</td><td>Potato</td><td>Zea mays</td><td></td><td>[56]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Fusarium compactum</td><td>NFCCI 2946</td><td rowspan="2">Aegle marmelos</td><td>Poa annua</td><td></td><td rowspan="2">[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore accessed on 29 April 2022, [57–62]]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2904</td><td>Soil</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10"></td><td>NFCCI 5208</td><td>Zingiber officinale</td><td>Spinach</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Wild rocket</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Cultivated rocket</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Lettuce</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Quercus suber</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Wheat</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Apple fruit cultivar Idared and Pink lady</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Banana corm and root rot</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Wheat soil</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Grasses</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Fusarium cugenangense</td><td>NFCCI 2872</td><td>Wilted tomato plant (Root)</td><td>Crocus sp.</td><td></td><td>[56,63]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Gossypium barbadense</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Human toe nail</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Vicia faba</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Fusarium duoseptatum</td><td>NFCCI 681</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Kepok</td><td></td><td>[56,63]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Gossypium sp.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Musa sapientum cv. Pisang Ambon</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Rastali</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>M. acuminata var. Dwarf Cavendish</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Fusarium fabacearum</td><td>NFCCI 3239</td><td>Marigold seeds</td><td>M. acuminata var. Pisang Ambon</td><td></td><td>[56,63]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3706</td><td>Castor root</td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Raja</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5200</td><td>Pea</td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Hawa</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Awak</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Susu</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Keling</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Zea mays</td><td></td><td>[56]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Glycine max</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table 4. *Cont.*</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Identity</th><th colspan="2">This Study</th><th colspan="2">Earlier Reports</th></tr><tr><th>NFCCI No.</th><th>Host</th><th>Host</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">Fusarium glycines</td><td>NFCCI 3048</td><td>Wilted cumin plant</td><td>Linum usitatissium</td><td rowspan="2">[56]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 1788</td><td>Soil</td><td>Ocimum basilicum<br>Glycine max</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium gossypinum</td><td>NFCCI 2467</td><td>Bottle gourd</td><td>Gossypium hirsutum</td><td>[56]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Fusarium grosmichelii</td><td rowspan="4">NFCCI 3243</td><td rowspan="4">Cow pea</td><td>Banana corm</td><td rowspan="4">[63,64]</td></tr><tr><td>M. acuminata var. Pisang Ambon</td></tr><tr><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Awak</td></tr><tr><td>M. acuminata var. Pisang Ambon Lumut</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Fusarium lumajangense</td><td rowspan="4">NFCCI 4180</td><td rowspan="4">Soil</td><td>M. acuminata var. Cavendish</td><td rowspan="4">[65]</td></tr><tr><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Siem Jumbo</td></tr><tr><td>M. acuminata var. Pisang Ambon Kuning</td></tr><tr><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Kepok</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Fusarium microconidium</td><td rowspan="2">NFCCI 3020</td><td rowspan="2">Soil</td><td>Musa sp. var. Pisang Raja Nangka</td><td rowspan="2">[65]</td></tr><tr><td>Musa acuminata var. Pisang Mas Kirana</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium nanum</td><td>NFCCI 5192</td><td>Zingiber officinale</td><td>Unknown</td><td>[11]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Fusarium nirenbergiae</td><td rowspan="5">NFCCI 5189</td><td rowspan="5">Soil</td><td>Musa nana (Leaves)</td><td rowspan="5">[[66], https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore accessed on 29 April 2022]</td></tr><tr><td>Solanum lycopersicum</td></tr><tr><td>Musa acuminata</td></tr><tr><td>Oat</td></tr><tr><td>Soil</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10">Fusarium sulawesiense</td><td rowspan="10">NFCCI 2956</td><td rowspan="10">Cotton field</td><td>Triticum sp.</td><td rowspan="10">[56]</td></tr><tr><td>Sorghum sp.</td></tr><tr><td>Secale cereale</td></tr><tr><td>Musa sp.</td></tr><tr><td>S. tuberosum</td></tr><tr><td>Solanum lycopersicum</td></tr><tr><td>Passiflora edulis</td></tr><tr><td>Chrysanthemum sp.</td></tr><tr><td>Bouvardia longiflora</td></tr><tr><td>Dianthus caryophyllus</td></tr><tr><td>Agathosma betulina</td></tr><tr><td>Tulip roots</td></tr><tr><td>Amputated human toe</td></tr><tr><td>Human leg ulcer</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2886</td><td>Azadirachta indica<br>(Endophyte)</td><td></td><td>Musa acuminata var. Pisang Cere (AAA)<br>Oryza sp.</td><td rowspan="2">[[11,67-70], https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore accessed on 29 April 2022]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 3031</td><td>Piberbettle leaf (endophyte)</td><td></td><td>Smilax corbularia<br>Acalypha insulana<br>Alocasia odora<br>Ipomoea batatas<br>Musa nana<br>Musa paradisiacal<br>Plum leaf<br>Triticum aestivum<br>Soil<br>Oryza sativa<br>Aleurocanthus woglumi<br>Phaseolus lunatus<br>Eucalyptus<br>Prosopis sp.<br>Cucumis melo<br>Galia melon<br>Bixa orellana<br>Gossypium hirsutum<br>Sorghum vulgare<br>Musa sampientum var. Robusta<br>Mango leaf<br>Rhizosphere soil (Bromus tectorum)<br>Soybean</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4919</td><td>Soil</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 4. Cont.**</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Identity</th><th colspan="2">This Study</th><th colspan="2">Earlier Reports</th></tr><tr><th>NFCCI No.</th><th>Host</th><th>Host</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">Fusarium tardichlamydosporum</td><td>NFCCI 3051</td><td rowspan="2">Wilted cumin plant</td><td>M. sapientum cv. Pisang Awak Legor</td><td rowspan="3">[56,63]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 1895</td><td>Musa sp. var. Monthan</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2491</td><td>Soil</td><td>M. acuminata var. Pisang Barangan<br>Musa sp. var. Bluggoe<br>M. acuminata var. Lady finger<br>Musa sp. var. Ney Poovan<br>Musa sp. var. Pisang Awak Legor</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Fusarium tardicrescens</td><td>NFCCI 680</td><td>Azadirachta indica (Endophyte)</td><td>Musa sp. var. Harare</td><td rowspan="2">[63]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5201</td><td>Dead bark</td><td>Cicer sp.<br>Raphanus sp.</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora oblonga</td><td>NFCCI 2150</td><td>Soil</td><td>Human eye<br>Carbonatite</td><td>[[11], https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore accessed on 29 April 2022]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6">Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 5190</td><td>Ginger</td><td>Human wound</td><td rowspan="6">[[11], https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore accessed on 29 April 2022]</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 2961</td><td>Pigeon pea root (Wilted)</td><td>Equine eye</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5210</td><td>Chilli fruit</td><td>Soil</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 4830</td><td>Cotton rot</td><td>Homo sapiens<br>Gossypium hirsutum<br>Podocnemis unifilis</td></tr><tr><td>NFCCI 5211</td><td>Onion plants (Damping-off)</td><td>Human cornea<br>Human skin leukemic<br>Human blood leukemia<br>Human blood</td></tr></tbody></table>

## 3.2. Detection of Beauvericin Produced

### 3.2.1. Thin Layer Chromatography

Thin layer chromatography analysis of fungal extracts along with the standard beauvericin showed spots at the same retention factor as the standard beauvericin, depicting the possible presence of beauvericin in the fungal extracts (Figure 4).

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Thin layer chromatography developed in petroleum ether: Ethyl acetate (1:1) showing spots of beauvericin detected using iodine vapours. Black arrow shows spots of beauvericin (1) Standard beauvericin (500 µg/mL) (2) *Fusarium tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 (3) *F. cugenangense* NFCCI 2872 (4) *Neocosmospora vasinfecta* NFCCI 2960 (5) *Fusarium annulatum* NFCCI 2962.</figcaption></figure>
### 3.2.2. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

There was a linear correlation between the concentration of the standard beauvericin and the areas of the peak in HPLC chromatogram. The retention time of standard beauvericin was found to be 9.1 min (Figure 5). Biomass produced by various isolates varied from 4.41 to 14.17 g/L of FDM. Among 88, 50 isolates (56%) were found to be capable of beauvericin production which varied from 0.01 to 15.82 mg/g of biomass. Table 5 shows the mycelial biomass, BEA content of mycelial biomass and final medium pH after a week's fermentation of different *Fusarium* isolates in *Fusarium* defined medium. *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 showed maximum beauvericin production of 15.82 mg/g of biomass. *F. carminascens* NFCCI 5204 and *F. fabacearum* NFCCI 5200 also produced a significant amount of beauvericin: 13.54 and 14.25 mg/g of biomass, respectively (Figure 6). The final pH of the fermented broth varied from 6.38 to 8.96 for different isolates. The correlation coefficient between biomass produced and the beauvericin produced was 0.2692; that between the pH of the fermented broth and the beauvericin produced was 0.16, indicating very weak and/or no association in both cases.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** HPLC chromatograms of (a) standard beauvericin (500 µg/mL) (b) *Fusarium fabacearum* NFCCI 5200 extract (c) *F. sacchari* NFCCI 4889 extract (d) *F. carminascens* NFCCI 5204 extract (e) *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 extract (f) *F. cugenangense* NFCCI 2872 extract.</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 5.** Mycelial biomass and BEA content of *Fusarium* isolates and their pH in the *Fusarium* defined medium (on day 7).</caption><thead><tr><th>Identity</th><th>NFCCI No.</th><th>Biomass (g/L)</th><th>BEA Content (mg/g)</th><th>Final pH of Medium</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fusarium nirenbergiae</td><td>NFCCI 5189</td><td>6.61 ± 0.26</td><td>2.93 ± 0.12</td><td>7.73 ± 0.32</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 3264</td><td>6.72 ± 0.37</td><td>0.97 ± 0.14</td><td>7.48 ± 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lacertarum</td><td>NFCCI 3044</td><td>8.07 ± 0.52</td><td>0.66 ± 0.14</td><td>7.65 ± 0.24</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 5190</td><td>7.14 ± 0.08</td><td>-</td><td>7.63 ± 0.22</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium fabacearum</td><td>NFCCI 3239</td><td>6.22 ± 0.31</td><td>-</td><td>7.77 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 3147</td><td>6.34 ± 0.10</td><td>-</td><td>7.6 ± 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium caatingaense</td><td>NFCCI 5191</td><td>9.26 ± 0.26</td><td>0.33 ± 0.03</td><td>7.63 ± 0.03</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora solani</td><td>NFCCI 2315</td><td>8.06 ± 0.65</td><td>0.34 ± 0.07</td><td>7.61 ± 0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 3072</td><td>6.83 ± 0.09</td><td>-</td><td>7.75 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium glycines</td><td>NFCCI 3048</td><td>5.64 ± 0.12</td><td>2.00 ± 0.44</td><td>7.39 ± 0.24</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 3300</td><td>7.10 ± 0.34</td><td>0.66 ± 0.05</td><td>7.62 ± 0.54</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2964</td><td>7.07 ± 0.19</td><td>1.11 ± 0.18</td><td>7.5 ± 0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium mangiferae</td><td>NFCCI 2885</td><td>7.97 ± 0.28</td><td>-</td><td>7.8 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium grosmichelii</td><td>NFCCI 3243</td><td>6.37 ± 0.59</td><td>1.44 ± 0.083</td><td>7.57 ± 0.21</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2962</td><td>7.42 ± 0.06</td><td>3.26 ± 0.23</td><td>7.49 ± 0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium nanum</td><td>NFCCI 5192</td><td>6.40 ± 0.18</td><td>-</td><td>7 ± 0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 3093</td><td>8.61 ± 0.83</td><td>2.31 ± 0.58</td><td>7.32 ± 0.22</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sulawesiense</td><td>NFCCI 2956</td><td>6.44 ± 0.37</td><td>-</td><td>7.44 ± 0.29</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora metavorans</td><td>NFCCI 5193</td><td>6.25 ± 0.46</td><td>-</td><td>7.34 ± 0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sulawesiense</td><td>NFCCI 2886</td><td>5.89 ± 0.27</td><td>-</td><td>7.34 ± 0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2959</td><td>6.13 ± 0.49</td><td>-</td><td>7.29 ± 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sulawesiense</td><td>NFCCI 3031</td><td>8.99 ± 0.67</td><td>-</td><td>7.31 ± 0.48</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium compactum</td><td>NFCCI 2946</td><td>8.89 ± 0.11</td><td>0.08 ± 0.04</td><td>7.44 ± 0.42</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora vasinfecta</td><td>NFCCI 2960</td><td>6.64 ± 0.41</td><td>4.11 ± 0.17</td><td>7.44 ± 0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium brachygibbosum</td><td>NFCCI 3703</td><td>5.74 ± 0.32</td><td>0.15 ± 0.06</td><td>8.79 ± 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium irregulare</td><td>NFCCI 5194</td><td>6.58 ± 0.48</td><td>1.88 ± 0.06</td><td>8.5 ± 0.20</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora oblonga</td><td>NFCCI 2150</td><td>5.06 ± 0.19</td><td>-</td><td>8.67 ± 0.37</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora metavorans</td><td>NFCCI 3475</td><td>6.51 ± 0.22</td><td>-</td><td>8.64 ± 0.06</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium commune</td><td>NFCCI 2871</td><td>8.15 ± 0.18</td><td>-</td><td>8.67 ± 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora metavorans</td><td>NFCCI 4095</td><td>6.71 ± 0.37</td><td>-</td><td>8.96 ± 0.28</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium spinosum</td><td>NFCCI 5195</td><td>9.15 ± 0.64</td><td>-</td><td>8.9 ± 0.07</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium microconidium</td><td>NFCCI 3020</td><td>8.52 ± 0.13</td><td>-</td><td>8.82 ± 0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium cugenangense</td><td>NFCCI 2872</td><td>7.01 ± 0.07</td><td>4.47 ± 0.51</td><td>8.69 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium irregulare</td><td>NFCCI 2460</td><td>9.04 ± 0.13</td><td>-</td><td>8.84 ± 0.03</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 3065</td><td>6.22 ± 0.42</td><td>0.20 ± 0.06</td><td>8.93 ± 0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium tardicrescens</td><td>NFCCI 680</td><td>7.12 ± 0.34</td><td>0.47 ± 0.07</td><td>8.87 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 5196</td><td>9.18 ± 0.18</td><td>0.60 ± 0.06</td><td>7.87 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lacertarum</td><td>NFCCI 5197</td><td>7.79 ± 2.1</td><td>0.49 ± 0.17</td><td>8.03 ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium irregulare</td><td>NFCCI 5198</td><td>11.30 ± 4.8</td><td>-</td><td>8.36 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2470</td><td>10.71 ± 0.29</td><td>-</td><td>7.87 ± 0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 3091</td><td>5.68 ± 0.17</td><td>-</td><td>7.28 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora metavorans</td><td>NFCCI 5199</td><td>5.35 ± 0.57</td><td>-</td><td>7.42 ± 0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium brachygibbosum</td><td>NFCCI 3074</td><td>7.80 ± 0.69</td><td>0.01 ± 0.05</td><td>7.72 ± 0.21</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 2961</td><td>10.24 ± 0.7</td><td>0.67 ± 0.07</td><td>8.17 ± 0.45</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lacertarum</td><td>NFCCI 3049</td><td>7.22 ± 0.51</td><td>2.39 ± 0.39</td><td>7.19 ± 0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 3092</td><td>5.79 ± 0.14</td><td>-</td><td>7.26 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 1127</td><td>5.56 ± 0.61</td><td>-</td><td>6.92 ± 0.09</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium fabacearum</td><td>NFCCI 3706</td><td>7.30 ± 0.47</td><td>1.00 ± 0.20</td><td>8.6 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium compactum</td><td>NFCCI 2904</td><td>6.45 ± 0.18</td><td>3.33 ± 0.51</td><td>7.02 ± 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lacertarum</td><td>NFCCI 3038</td><td>7.59 ± 0.09</td><td>0.16 ± 0.06</td><td>8.07 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2953</td><td>7.38 ± 0.15</td><td>2.21 ± 0.12</td><td>7.85 ± 0.17</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 5. Cont.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Identity</th><th>NFCCI No.</th><th>Biomass (g/L)</th><th>BEA Content (mg/g)</th><th>Final pH of Medium</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fusarium<br>tardichlamydosporum</td><td>NFCCI 3051</td><td>7.99 ± 0.12</td><td>2.19 ± 0.18</td><td>7.92 ± 0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium duoseptatum</td><td>NFCCI 681</td><td>6.37 ± 0.28</td><td>-</td><td>6.86 ± 0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 3270</td><td>5.14 ± 0.19</td><td>4.84 ± 0.36</td><td>7.24 ± 0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium verticillioides</td><td>NFCCI 2945</td><td>5.43 ± 1.2</td><td>-</td><td>7.18 ± 0.3</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora vasinfecta</td><td>NFCCI 2972</td><td>7.61 ± 2.1</td><td>-</td><td>7.32 ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2053</td><td>4.64 ± 0.09</td><td>3.78 ± 0.55</td><td>7.73 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium proliferatum</td><td>NFCCI 3282</td><td>6.51 ± 3.2</td><td>0.16 ± 0.19</td><td>7.55 ± 0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium fabacearum</td><td>NFCCI 5200</td><td>10.07 ± 0.17</td><td>14.25 ± 0.28</td><td>8.11 ± 0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium tardicrescens</td><td>NFCCI 5201</td><td>11.23 ± 0.38</td><td>15.82 ± 0.54</td><td>8.2 ± 0.11</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sacchari</td><td>NFCCI 4889</td><td>14.17 ± 2.7</td><td>5.95 ± 0.61</td><td>8.23 ± 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Albonectria rigidiuscula</td><td>NFCCI 5202</td><td>14.03 ± 0.07</td><td>0.16 ± 0.04</td><td>7.39 ± 0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium<br>tardichlamydosporum</td><td>NFCCI 1895</td><td>7.80 ± 1.8</td><td>0.12 ± 0.05</td><td>7.27 ± 0.24</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium pernambucanum</td><td>NFCCI 5203</td><td>9.90 ± 0.15</td><td>1.04 ± 0.11</td><td>8.09 ± 0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium carminascens</td><td>NFCCI 5204</td><td>11.15 ± 2.4</td><td>13.54 ± 0.62</td><td>8.44 ± 0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium nirenbergiae</td><td>NFCCI 4859</td><td>6.52 ± 0.08</td><td>-</td><td>7.5 ± 0.32</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium irregulare</td><td>NFCCI 5205</td><td>9.32 ± 1.6</td><td>-</td><td>7.59 ± 0.27</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium brachygibbosum</td><td>NFCCI 4972</td><td>11.03 ± 0.15</td><td>-</td><td>7.66 ± 0.21</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium brachygibbosum</td><td>NFCCI 5206</td><td>8.52 ± 2.9</td><td>-</td><td>7.66 ± 0.51</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium pernambucanum</td><td>NFCCI 5207</td><td>9.80 ± 2.6</td><td>1.43 ± 0.16</td><td>7.22 ± 0.18</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium oxysporum</td><td>NFCCI 4759</td><td>7.69 ± 0.14</td><td>2.22 ± 0.43</td><td>7.12 ± 0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium verticillioides</td><td>NFCCI 4963</td><td>10.55 ± 3.7</td><td>-</td><td>7.55 ± 0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium verticillioides</td><td>NFCCI 2696</td><td>11.05 ± 2.7</td><td>-</td><td>7.85 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium compactum</td><td>NFCCI 5208</td><td>4.41 ± 0.13</td><td>1.146 ± 0.13</td><td>6.67 ± 0.07</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium gossypinum</td><td>NFCCI 2467</td><td>4.59 ± 0.17</td><td>0.27 ± 0.08</td><td>8.29 ± 1.5</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium acutatum</td><td>NFCCI 5209</td><td>4.69 ± 0.15</td><td>0.29 ± 0.06</td><td>6.38 ± 0.7</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 5210</td><td>7.50 ± 3.7</td><td>0.90 ± 0.08</td><td>7.86 ± 0.36</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora metavorans</td><td>NFCCI 4885</td><td>7.12 ± 2.5</td><td>0.86 ± 0.07</td><td>7.94 ± 0.59</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium glycines</td><td>NFCCI 1788</td><td>11.20 ± 0.13</td><td>1.05 ± 0.10</td><td>8.04 ± 0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium<br>tardichlamydosporum</td><td>NFCCI 2491</td><td>13.59 ± 0.19</td><td>1.38 ± 0.11</td><td>8 ± 0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Albonectria rigidiuscula</td><td>NFCCI 4888</td><td>13.77 ± 0.27</td><td>1.09 ± 0.08</td><td>8.13 ± 0.8</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 4830</td><td>4.67 ± 2.6</td><td>1.01 ± 0.05</td><td>7.65 ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Neocosmospora suttoniana</td><td>NFCCI 5211</td><td>8.56 ± 3.1</td><td>-</td><td>8 ± 0.07</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 5212</td><td>10.94 ± 1.2</td><td>-</td><td>8.14 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lumajangense</td><td>NFCCI 4180</td><td>8.26 ± 2.7</td><td>1.07 ± 0.39</td><td>8.18 ± 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium lacertarum</td><td>NFCCI 4792</td><td>9.66 ± 1.8</td><td>-</td><td>8.23 ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium annulatum</td><td>NFCCI 2949</td><td>6.70 ± 0.27</td><td>-</td><td>8.16 ± 0.02</td></tr><tr><td>Fusarium sulawesiense</td><td>NFCCI 4919</td><td>8.72 ± 0.44</td><td>-</td><td>8.25 ± 0.14</td></tr></tbody></table>

- Not Detected; All values represent means ± S.E.M.

### 3.2.3. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)

The HRMS results showed molecular ion peaks at 806.3999 (m/z) [M + Na]$^+$, indicating the presence of beauvericin (C₄₅H₅₇N₃O₉) in the fungal extracts (Figure 7). Similar (m/z) [M + Na]$^+$ 806.3956 have been reported for beauvericin (C₄₅H₅₇N₃O₉) [71]. It was observed that the fungal extract contains, majorly, beauvericin, as maximum ion intensity was observed with m/z 806.3999.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Mycelial biomass and BEA content produced by different *Fusarium* isolates in the *Fusarium* defined medium (on day 7).</figcaption></figure>

a

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** *Cont.*</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** HRMS spectra from higher-collision dissociation of the [M + Na]⁺ ions of fungal extract, (a) *Fusarium sacchari* NFCCI 4889 (b) *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201.</figcaption></figure>

### 3.3. Large Scale Fermentation

Fermentation of 3.5 liters of *Fusarium* defined medium resulted in 36.27 gms of biomass which, on extraction, resulted in 144 mg of crude which was dissolved in 36 mL of acetone-trile, making the final concentration 4 mg/mL. This extract was subjected to HPLC; it was found that beauvericin is the major compound in the extract, as the area covered by it was found to be nearly 64–68%. This stock was diluted as per requirement for further studies.

### 3.4. Antimicrobial and MIC of Crude Extract of Fusarium tardicrescens NFCCI 5201

The extract showed promising results against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 and *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470. The MIC of the crude extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 was found to be 15.63 µg/mL against *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470 and 62.5 µg/mL against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 (Figure 8). The extract did not show any antimicrobial activity against *Escherichia coli* MTCC 739, *Bacillus subtilis* MTCC 121, *Raoultella planticola* MTCC 530, *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* MTCC 2453 and *Staphylococcus aureus* MTCC 96.
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Microtiter plate showing MIC of crude extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 (Rows a-c) and *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470 (Rows d-f).</figcaption></figure>

3.5. Individual and Combined Effect of Extract of Fusarium tardicrescens NFCCI 5201 Containing Beauvericin and Amphotericin B on Pathogenic Fungi

The antifungal activity was observed as a reduction in the mycelial growth of pathogenic fungi in poisoned plates when compared to the control plates (Figure 9). The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed good antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744 and *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482 showed a % inhibition of 84.31, 49.76, 38.22 and 35.13. Amphotericin B (40 µg/mL) inhibited *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716, showing % inhibition of 71.76, 55.72, 56.82 and 48.68. Interestingly, the results were remarkable when the extracts of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (20 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (20 µg/mL) were used in combination against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716, showing % inhibition of 50.35, 79.37, 48.07 and 76.72%, respectively. Individually, extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed % inhibition of 1.68, 49.76, 2.56 and 7.9 against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716. Individually, amphotericin B (40 µg/mL) showed % inhibition of 11.51, 56.82, 1.28 and 48.67 against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716. The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed better results than amphotericin B in the case of *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482 and *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327 (Figure 10).
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** Antifungal activity of individual and combined effect of extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin and amphotericin B on various pathogenic fungi (a) *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482 (b) *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108 (c) *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327 (d) *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263 (e) *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744 (f) *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690. PDA: Potato dextrose agar (Control); Ab: Potato dextrose agar containing amphotericin B (40 µg/mL); BEA: Potato dextrose agar having extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL); Ab + BEA: Potato dextrose agar having amphotericin B (20 µg/mL) and extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (20 µg/mL).</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

**Figure 10.** Inhibition of mycelial growth (%) of individual and combined effect of extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin and amphotericin B on various pathogenic fungi using food poison technique.

3.6. *Antioxidant Effect of Extract of Fusarium tardicrescens NFCCI 5201 Containing Beauvericin*

Figure 11 shows the free radical scavenging activity of the extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin and the standard ascorbic acid when tested for in vitro antioxidant activity. The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin showed good satisfactory dose-dependent DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC₅₀ value of 0.675 mg/mL when tested with standard ascorbic acid, which showed IC₅₀ value of 0.146 mg/mL.

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

**Figure 11.** The free radical scavenging activity of the extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 con-
taining beauvericin (mg/mL) and the standard ascorbic acid (mg/mL) when tested for in vitro
antioxidant activity.
## 4. Discussion

One of the greatest hindrances in studying *Fusarium* has been the ambiguous nomenclature or incorrect species names of the isolates because of the limitations in recognition of the species based on morphology [72]. Being the world's most important pathogens, its prophylaxis and management needs correct and rapid identification [73]. As mentioned earlier, ITS and LSU frequently fail to distinguish at the species level and, preferably, *Tef1-α* and *Rpb2* can be used to distinguish isolates at the species level. Literature reveals that Indian *Fusarium* isolates have been mostly identified on the basis of morphology. Very few studies were found where the *Fusarium* isolates had been identified using molecular studies. Wherever molecular studies were performed, they were based on the ITS gene region; very limited studies used either *Tef1-α* or *Rpb2* or both of these gene regions [74]. To our knowledge, this is the first study from India where *Fusarium* isolates have been identified on the basis of six gene regions, nrDNA (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (*Tef1-α*), 28S large subunit of the nrDNA (LSU), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (*Rpb2*), beta-tubulin (β-tub) and calmodulin (CaM). Interestingly, in this study, 17 species, *Fusarium caatingaense*, *F. carminascens*, *F. compactum*, *F. cugenangense*, *F. duoseptatum*, *F. fabacearum*, *F. glycines*, *F. gossypinum*, *F. grosmichelii*, *F. lumajangense*, *F. microconidium*, *F. nanum*, *F. nirenbergiae*, *F. sulawesiense*, *F. tardichlamydosporum*, *F. tardicrescens*, *Neocosmospora oblonga* and *N. suttoniana* were found to be new records for India, most of them being reported from new hosts [53,54].

BEA is a potent bioactive compound possessing antimicrobial, anti-insecticidal, antitumor and antiplatelet activities at extremely low concentration and with unique uncharacterized active mechanisms. A review of the literature indicates that no study was undertaken in India on BEA production from Indian species of *Fusarium*, except [43] who had reported BEA production from two isolates of *Fusarium* viz., *F. anthophilum* (Host: Sugarcane; 1300 µg/g) and *F. nygamai* (Host: *Cajanus indicus*; 3 µg/g) [43]. This work was undertaken in Bari, Italy. This suggests that Indian *Fusarium* isolates have remained unexplored for their capability of BEA production and its applicability.

*Albonectria rigidiuscula*, *F. acutatum*, *F. annulatum*, *F. brachygibbosum*, *F. caatingaense*, *F. carminascens*, *F. compactum*, *F. cugenangense*, *F. fabacearum*, *F. glycines*, *F. gossypinum*, *F. grosmichelii*, *F. irregulare*, *F. lacertarum*, *F. lumajangense*, *F. nirenbergiae*, *F. oxysporum*, *F. pernambucanum*, *F. proliferatum*, *F. sacchari*, *F. tardichlamydosporum*, *F. tardicrescens*, *N. metavorans*, *N. solani*, *N. suttoniana* and *N. vasinfecta* were found to be the positive producers of BEA in this study, many of them being reported as BEA producers for the first time in this study. *Fusarium tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 showed maximum beauvericin production of 15.82 mg/g of biomass. *Fusarium carminascens* NFCCI 5204 and *F. fabacearum* NFCCI 5200 also produced a significantly ample amount of beauvericin, 13.54 and 14.25 mg/g of biomass, respectively, all three of them being reported for the first time as significant BEA producers in this study.

In earlier reports, BEA was detected in cultures of *Fusarium moniliforme*, *F. semitectum* [75], *F. subglutinans*, *F. thapsinum* [76], *F. sambucinum*, *F. acuminatum*, *F. equiseti*, *F. longipes*, *F. anthophilum*, *F. oxysporum*, *F. poae*, *F. avenaceum*, *F. beomiforme*, *F. dlamini*, *F. bulbicola*, *F. nygamai* [43], *F. chlamydosporum*, *F. solani*, *F. proliferatum* and *F. sacchari* [77].

The crude extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 showed promising results against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940 and *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470, with MIC values of 15.63 µg/mL against *Micrococcus luteus* MTCC 2470 and 62.5 µg/mL against *Staphylococcus aureus* MLS16 MTCC 2940. BEA from *F. oxysporum* had a potent inhibitory effect on the growth of pathogenic *Staphylococcus aureus* with a MIC of 3.91 µM [23]. Earlier reports reveal that inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values of BEA against *Bacillus subtilis*, *Staphylococcus haemolyticus*, *Pseudomonas lachrymans*, *Agrobacterium tumefaciens*, *Escherichia coli* and *Xanthomo vesicatoria* by a 96-well microplate broth dilution-MTT assay ranged between 18.45 and 70.41 µg/mL [78]. BEA has been known to inhibit bacteria, including *Bacillus pumilus* (0.1 µg of BEA per disk), several other species of *Bacillus* and *Paenibacillus* (1 µg of BEA per disk), *P. validus*, *Bifidobacterium adolescentis*, *Clostridium perfringens*, *Eubacterium biforme*, *Peptostreptococcus anaerobius* and *P. productus* (25 µg of
BEA per disk) [18]. Strong antimicrobial activity has been reported against *Staphylococcus aureus*, *Salmonella typhimurium* and *Bacillus cereus* with MIC values of 3.91 µM, 6.25 and 3.12 µg/mL, respectively [19,23].

With BEA being a high score ABC inhibitor, it has been reported to show strong synergy with some azole compounds (miconazole, ketoconazole) against *Candida albicans* and *Candida parapsilosis* (in vitro as well as in vivo). It has been reported that BEA individually fails to show antifungal activity, but it was found to synergize the effect of ketoconazole [25].

In this study, the antifungal activity was observed as a reduction in the mycelial growth of pathogenic fungi of agricultural importance in poisoned plates when compared to the control plates. The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed good antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Geotrichum candidum* NFCCI 3744 and *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482 showing % inhibition of 84.31, 49.76, 38.22 and 35.13. Interestingly, when the extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (20 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (20 µg/mL) were used in combination, they produced a synergized antifungal effect against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716, showing % inhibition of 50.35, 79.37, 48.07 and 76.72%, respectively. Individually, the extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed a % inhibition of 1.68, 49.76, 2.56 and 7.9 against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716, and amphotericin B (40 µg/mL) showed a % inhibition of 11.51, 56.82, 1.28 and 48.67 against *Rhizopus* sp. NFCCI 2108, *Sclerotium rolfsii* NFCCI 4263, *Bipolaris sorokiniana* NFCCI 4690 and *Absidia* sp. NFCCI 2716. The extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin (40 µg/mL) showed better results than amphotericin B in the case of *Pythium* sp. NFCCI 3482, *Rhizoctonia solani* NFCCI 4327. This is the first report on the testing of BEA against filamentous, agriculturally important fungal pathogens. The synergistic effect of BEA along with amphotericin B against filamentous agriculturally important pathogens has also been studied for the first time. Earlier studies focused on the synergistic effect of BEA and azoles (miconazole, ketoconazole) on yeast (*Candida albicans* and *Candida parapsilosis*). This study focuses on the synergistic effect of fungal extracts and polyene (amphotericin B) on agriculturally important filamentous fungal pathogens. Moreover, the extract of *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 containing beauvericin showed good dose-dependent DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC₅₀ value of 0.675 mg/mL. Antioxidant activity has been reported from metabolites produced by *Fusarium oxysporum* [79]. The DPPH-radicals' scavenging activity has been reported from *F. solani* with IC₅₀ value of 24 µg/mL [80].

**5. Conclusions**

*Fusarium* spp. have been known globally for centuries for their pathogenic behavior; however, they can prove to be a treasure trove because of their capability to produce other interesting metabolites of great applicability in various sectors such as food, agriculture and medicine. As shown in this study, the antifungal activity became synergized when a half dosage of the fungal extract and amphotericin B was used. Therefore, this study indicates that concerted efforts are required, in which high-throughput screening needs to be carried out with dosage of the BEA and the other antifungal compound, which can possibly be used at a large scale for calculating the optimum dosage required. Similar studies can be carried out in the field of medicine where the dosage is optimized and the delivery of the drug combinations is also targeted.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8070662/s1, Figure S1: Fermentation of different isolates in *Fusarium* defined media after a week's fermentation (a) Control (Uninnoculated FDM medium) (b) *Fusarium fabacearum* NFCCI 5200 (c) *F. annulatum* NFCCI 3300 (d) *F. sulawesiense* NFCCI 4919 (e) *F. sacchari* NFCCI 4889 (f) *F. annulatum* NFCCI 5212 (g) *F. nirenbergiae* NFCCI 5189 (h) *F. tardicrescens* NFCCI 5201 (i) *F. lacertarum* NFCCI 4792 (j) *F. lumajangense* NFCCI 4180 (k) *F. pernambucanum* NFCCI 5203 (l) *F. duoseptatum* NFCCI 681 (m) *F. tardichlamydosporum* NFCCI 1895 (n) *Neocosmospora solani*
NFCCI 2315 (o) *F. mangiferae* NFCCI 2885 (p) *F. annulatum* NFCCI 2964 (q) *F. sacchari* NFCCI 3147 (r) *F. grosmichelii* NFCCI 3243; Table S1: GenBank Accession No. and other details of the isolates used in the phylogenetic study.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, S.R. and S.K.S.; methodology, S.R. and S.K.S.; formal analysis, S.R. and S.K.S.; investigation, S.R.; resources, S.K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R.; writing—review and editing, S.R., S.K.S. and L.D.; supervision, S.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** We thank Prashant Dhakephalkar, Director MACS-Agharkar Research Institute, Pune for providing the necessary facilities and encouragement to carry out the research work. Shiwali Rana acknowledges the University Grants Commission (U.G.C.), New Delhi for granting a Senior Research Fellowship (SRF), and S.P. Pune University, Pune for registering for the Ph.D. degree. We acknowledge technical support and help by Deepak Kumar Maurya and Subhash Gaikwad of Agharkar Research Institute, Pune. Laurent Dufossé deeply acknowledges the strong financial support from Conseil Régional de Bretagne and Conseil Régional de La Réunion for research activities dedicated to microbial biotechnology.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Gupta, A.K.; Baran, R.; Summerbell, R.C. *Fusarium* infections of the skin. *Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.* **2000**, *13*, 121–128. [CrossRef]

2. Summerell, B.A. Resolving *Fusarium*: Current status of the genus. *Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.* **2019**, *57*, 323–339. [CrossRef]

3. Taylor, J.W.; Jacobson, D.J.; Kroken, S.; Kasuga, T.; Geiser, D.M.; Hibbett, D.S.; Fisher, M.C. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. *Fungal Genet. Biol.* **2000**, *31*, 21–32. [CrossRef]

4. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A.; Chen, W.; Bolchacova, E.; Voigt, K.; Crous, P.W.; et al. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2012**, *109*, 6241–6246. [CrossRef]

5. Odonnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus *Fusarium* are nonorthologous. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **1997**, *7*, 103–116. [CrossRef]

6. O'Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E.; Nirenberg, H.I. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the *Gibberella fujikuroi* species complex. *Mycologia* **1998**, *90*, 465–493. [CrossRef]

7. O'Donnell, K.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G.; Gueidan, C.; Crous, P.W.; Geiser, D.M. Novel multilocus sequence typing scheme reveals high genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the *Fusarium incarnatum*-*F. equiseti* and *F. chlamydosporum* species complexes within the United States. *J. Clin. Microbiol.* **2009**, *47*, 3851–3861. [CrossRef]

8. O'Donnell, K. Molecular phylogeny of the *Nectria haematococca-Fusarium solani* species complex. *Mycologia* **2000**, *92*, 919–938. [CrossRef]

9. Nalim, F.A.; Samuels, G.J.; Wijesundera, R.L.; Geiser, D.M. New species from the *Fusarium solani* species complex derived from perithecia and soil in the Old-World tropics. *Mycologia* **2011**, *103*, 1302–1330. [CrossRef]

10. Herron, D.A.; Wingfield, M.J.; Wingfield, B.D.; Rodas, C.A.; Marincowitz, S.; Steenkamp, E.T. Novel taxa in the *Fusarium fujikuroi* species complex from *Pinus* spp. *Stud. Mycol.* **2015**, *80*, 131–150. [CrossRef]

11. Crous, P.W.; Lombard, L.; Sandoval-Denis, M.; Seifert, K.A.; Schroers, H.J.; Chaverri, P.; Gene, J.; Guarro, J.; Hirooka, Y.; Bensch, K.; et al. *Fusarium*: More than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell. *Stud. Mycol.* **2021**, *98*, 100116. [CrossRef]

12. Zhang, T.; Jia, X.P.; Zhuo, Y.; Liu, M.; Gao, H.; Liu, J.T.; Zhang, L.X. Cloning and characterization of a novel 2-ketoisovalerate reductase from the beauvericin producer *Fusarium proliferatum* LF061. *BMC Biotechnol.* **2012**, *12*, 55. [CrossRef]

13. Sood, S.; Sandhu, S.S.; Mukherjee, T.K. Pharmacological and therapeutic potential of beauvericin: A Short Review. *J. Proteom. Bioinform.* **2017**, *10*, 18–23. [CrossRef]

14. Hilgenfeld, R.; Saenger, W. Structural chemistry of natural and synthetic ionophores and their complexes with cations. *Top. Curr. Chem.* **1982**, *101*, 1–82.

15. Ovchinnikov, Y.A.; Ivanov, V.T.; Evstratov, A.E.; Mikhaleva, I.I.; Bystrov, V.F.; Portnova, S.L.; Balashova, T.A.; Meshcheryakova, E.N.; Tulchinsky, V.M. The enniatins ionophores, conformation and ion binding properties. *Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.* **1974**, *6*, 465–498. [CrossRef]

16. Steinrauf, L.K. Beauvericin and the other enniatins. *Met. Ions Biol. Syst.* **1985**, *19*, 139–171.

17. Lin, H.I.; Lee, Y.J.; Chen, B.F.; Tsai, M.C.; Lu, J.L.; Chou, C.J.; Jow, G.M. Involvement of Bcl-2 family, cytochrome c and caspase 3 in induction of apoptosis by beauvericin in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. *Cancer Lett.* **2005**, *230*, 248–259. [CrossRef]
18. Castlebury, L.A.; Sutherland, J.B.; Tanner, L.A.; Henderson, A.L.; Cerniglia, C.E. Short Communication: Use of a bioassay to evaluate the toxicity of beauvericin to bacteria. *World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **1999**, *15*, 131–133. [CrossRef]

19. Dzoyem, J.P.; Melong, R.; Tsamo, A.T.; Maffo, T.; Kapche, D.; Ngadjui, B.T.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. Cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of four compounds produced by an endophytic fungus *Epicoccum nigrum* associated with *Entada abyssinica*. *Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.* **2017**, *27*, 251–253. [CrossRef]

20. Fotso, J.; Smith, J.S. Evaluation of beauvericin toxicity with the bacterial bioluminescence assay and the Ames mutagenicity bioassay. *J. Food Sci.* **2003**, *68*, 1938–1941. [CrossRef]

21. Meca, G.; Sospedra, I.; Soriano, J.M.; Ritieni, A.; Moretti, A.; Manes, J. Antibacterial effect of the bioactive compound beauvericin produced by *Fusarium proliferatum* on solid medium of wheat. *Toxicon* **2010**, *56*, 349–354. [CrossRef]

22. Nilanonta, C.; Isaka, M.; Kittakoop, P.; Trakulnaleamsai, S.; Tanticharoen, M.; Thebtaranonth, Y. Precursor-directed biosynthesis of beauvericin analogs by the insect pathogenic fungus *Paecilomyces tenuipes* BCC 1614. *Tetrahedron* **2002**, *58*, 3355–3360. [CrossRef]

23. Zhang, H.W.; Ruan, C.F.; Bai, X.L.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, S.S.; Jiang, Y.Y. Isolation and identification of the antimicrobial agent beauvericin from the endophytic *Fusarium oxysporum* 5-19 with NMR and ESI-MS/MS. *Biomed Res. Int.* **2016**, *2016*, 1084670. [CrossRef]

24. Wu, X.F.; Xu, R.; Ouyang, Z.J.; Qian, C.; Shen, Y.; Wu, X.D.; Gu, Y.H.; Xu, Q.; Sun, Y. Beauvericin ameliorates experimental colitis by inhibiting activated T Cells via downregulation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. *PLoS ONE* **2013**, *8*, e83013. [CrossRef]

25. Fukuda, T.; Arai, M.; Tomoda, H.; Omura, S. New beauvericins, potentiators of antifungal miconazole activity, produced by Beauveria sp FKI-1366-II. *Structure elucidation. J. Antibiot.* **2004**, *57*, 117–124. [CrossRef]

26. Shekhar-Guturja, T.; Tebung, W.A.; Mount, H.; Liu, N.N.; Kohler, J.R.; Whiteway, M.; Cowen, L.E. Beauvericin potentiates azole activity via inhibition of multidrug efflux, blocks *Candida albicans* morphogenesis, and is effluxed via Yor1 and circuitry controlled by Zcf29. *Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.* **2016**, *60*, 7468–7480. [CrossRef]

27. Zhang, L.X.; Yan, K.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, R.; Bian, J.; Zheng, C.S.; Sun, H.X.; Chen, Z.H.; Sun, N.; An, R.; et al. High-throughput synergy screening identifies microbial metabolites as combination agents for the treatment of fungal infections. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2007**, *104*, 4606–4611. [CrossRef]

28. Campos, F.F.; Sales, P.A.; Romanha, A.J.; Araujo, M.S.S.; Siqueira, E.P.; Resende, J.M.; Alves, T.M.A.; Martins, O.A.; dos Santos, V.L.; Rosa, C.A.; et al. Bioactive endophytic fungi isolated from *Caesalpinia echinata* Lam. (Brazilwood) and identification of beauvericin as a trypanocidal metabolite from *Fusarium* sp. *Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz* **2015**, *110*, 65–74. [CrossRef]

29. Aamir, S.; Sutar, S.; Singh, S.K.; Baghela, A. A rapid and efficient method of fungal genomic DNA extraction, suitable for PCR based molecular methods. *Plant Pathol. Quar.* **2015**, *5*, 74–81. [CrossRef]

30. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In *PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications*; Innes, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322.

31. O'Donnell, K.; Kistler, H.C.; Cigelnik, E.; Ploetz, R.C. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: Concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1998**, *95*, 2044–2049. [CrossRef]

32. Vilgalys, R.; Sun, B.L. Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom *Pleurotus* revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA-sequences. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **1994**, *91*, 7832. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several *Cryptococcus* species. *J. Bacteriol.* **1990**, *172*, 4238–4246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Liu, Y.J.J.; Whelen, S.; Benjamin, D.H. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **1999**, *16*, 1799–1808. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Watanabe, M.; Yonezawa, T.; Lee, K.; Kumagai, S.; Sugita-Konishi, Y.; Goto, K.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Molecular phylogeny of the higher and lower taxonomy of the *Fusarium* genus and differences in the evolutionary histories of multiple genes. *BMC Evol. Biol.* **2011**, *11*, 322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

36. Peterson, S.W. Multilocus DNA sequence analysis shows that *Penicillium biourgeianum* is a distinct species closely related to *P. brevicompactum* and *P. olsonii*. *Mycol. Res.* **2004**, *108*, 434–440. [CrossRef]

37. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **2013**, *30*, 772–780. [CrossRef]

38. Larsson, A. AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large data sets. *Bioinformatics* **2014**, *30*, 3276–3278. [CrossRef]

39. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. *Nat. Methods* **2017**, *14*, 587. [CrossRef]

40. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **2015**, *32*, 268–274. [CrossRef]

41. Aberkane, A.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Gomez-Lopez, A.; Petrikkou, E.; Mellado, E.; Monzón, A.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L. Comparative evaluation of two different methods of inoculum preparation for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. *J. Antimicrob. Chemother.* **2002**, *50*, 719–722. [CrossRef]

42. Lee, H.; Kang, J.; Kim, B.; Park, S.; Lee, C. Statistical optimization of culture conditions for the production of enniatins H, I, and MK1688 by *Fusarium oxysporum* KFCC 11363P. *J. Biosci. Bioeng.* **2011**, *111*, 279–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Castella, G.; Kostecki, M.; Golinski, P.; Ritieni, A.; Chelkowski, J. Beauvericin production by *Fusarium* species. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **1998**, *64*, 3084–3088. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Touchstone, J.C. *Practice of Thin Layer Chromatography*, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 1–14.

45. Fessenden, R.J.; Fessenden, J.S.; Feist, P. *Organic Laboratory Techniques*, 3rd ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA; Brooks/Cole
Thomson Leaning, Inc.: Belmont, CA, USA, 2001; pp. 133–138.

46. Xu, L.J.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhou, L.G.; Wu, J.Y. Optimization of a liquid medium for beauvericin production in *Fusarium redolens* Dzf2 mycelial culture. *Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng.* **2010**, *15*, 460–466. [CrossRef]

47. Teh, C.H.; Nazni, W.A.; Nurulhusna, A.; Norazah, A.; Lee, H.L. Determination of antibacterial activity and minimum inhibitory concentration of larval extract of fly via resazurin-based turbidometric assay. *BMC Microbiol.* **2017**, *17*, 36. [CrossRef]

48. Foerster, S.; Desilvestro, V.; Hathaway, L.J.; Althaus, C.L.; Unemo, M. A new rapid resazurin-based microdilution assay for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*. *J. Antimicrob. Chemother.* **2017**, *72*, 1961–1968. [CrossRef]

49. Adjou, E.S.; Kouton, S.; Dahouenon-Ahoussi, E.; Sohounhloue, C.K.; Soumanou, M.M. Antifungal activity of *Ocimum canum* essential oil against toxinogenic fungi isolated from peanut seeds in post-harvest in Benin. *Int. Res. J. Biol.* **2012**, *1*, 20–26.

50. Philippe, S.; Souaïbou, F.; Guy, A.; Sébastien, D.T.; Boniface, Y.; Paulin, A.; Issaka, Y.; Dominique, S. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil of fresh leaves of *Ocimum gratissimum* from Benin against six mycotoxigenic fungi isolated from traditional cheese *wagashi*. *Res. J. Biol. Sci.* **2012**, *1*, 22–27.

51. Jinesh, V.K.; Jaishree, V.; Badami, S.; Shyam, W. Comparative evaluation of antioxidant properties of edible and non-edible leaves of *Anethum graveolens* Linn. *Indian J. Nat. Prod. Reso.* **2010**, *1*, 168–173.

52. Elizabeth, K.; Rao, M.W.A. Oxygen radical scavenging activity of *Curcumin*. *Int. J. Pharmaceu.* **1990**, *58*, 237–240.

53. Jamaluddin; Goswami, M.S.; Ojha, B.M. *Fungi of India* 1989–2001; Scientific Publishers: Jodhpur, India, 2004; pp. 1–326.

54. Manoharachary, C.; Atri, N.S.; Devi, T.P.; Kamil, D.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, A.P. *Bilgrami's Fungi of India List and References* (1988–2020); Today & Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2022; pp. 1–475.

55. Santos, A.C.D.; Trindade, J.V.C.; Lima, C.S.; Barbosa, R.D.; da Costa, A.F.; Tiago, P.V.; Oliveira, N. Morphology, phylogeny, and sexual stage of *Fusarium caatingaense* and *Fusarium pernambucanum*, new species of the *Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti* species complex associated with insects in Brazil. *Mycologia* **2019**, *111*, 244–259. [CrossRef]

56. Lombard, L.; Sandoval-Denis, M.; Lamprecht, S.C.; Crous, P.W. Epitypification of *Fusarium oxysporum*—Clearing the taxonomic chaos. *Persoonia* **2019**, *43*, 1–47. [CrossRef]

57. Vanwyk, P.S.; LOS, O.; Palterl, G.D.C.; Marasas, W.F.O. Geographic distribution and pathogenicity of *Fusarium* species associated with crown rot of wheat in the orange free state, South Africa. *Phytophylactica* **1987**, *19*, 271–274.

58. Matic, S.; Tabone, G.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A.; Guarnaccia, V. Emerging leafy vegetable crop diseases caused by the *Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti* species complex. *Phytopathol. Mediterr.* **2020**, *59*, 303–317. [CrossRef]

59. Sever, Z.; Ivić, D.; Kos, T.; Miličević, T. *Fusarium* rot in stored apples in Croatia *Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol.* **2012**, *63*, 463–470. [CrossRef]

60. Frisullo, S.; Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Grammatikaki, G.; Bottalico, A. Banana Corm and Root Rot by *Fusarium compactum*, in Crete. *Phytopathol. Mediterr.* **1994**, *33*, 78–82.

61. Mazhar, M.A.; Jahangir, A.Z.; Banihashemi, Z.; Izadpanah, K. First report of isolation and pathogenicity of *Fusarium compactum* on safflower. *Iran. J. Plant Pathol.* **2013**, *49*, 277.

62. Brizuela, A.M.; De la Lastra, E.; Marin-Guirao, J.I.; Galvez, L.; de Cara-Garcia, M.; Capote, N.; Palmero, D. *Fusarium* consortium populations associated with *Asparagus* crop in Spain and their role on field decline syndrome. *J. Fungi* **2020**, *6*, 336. [CrossRef]

63. Maryani, N.; Lombard, L.; Poerba, Y.S.; Subandiyah, S.; Crous, P.W.; Kema, G.H.J. Phylogeny and genetic diversity of the banana *Fusarium* wilt pathogen *Fusarium oxysporum* f. sp. cubense in the Indonesian centre of origin. *Stud. Mycol.* **2019**, *92*, 155–194. [CrossRef]

64. Ujat, A.; Vadamalai, G.; Hattori, Y.; Nakashima, C.; Wong, C.; Zulperi, D. Current classification and diversity of *Fusarium* species complex, the causal pathogen of *Fusarium* wilt disease of banana in Malaysia. *Agronomy* **2021**, *11*, 1955. [CrossRef]

65. Maryani, N.; Sandoval-Denis, M.; Lombard, L.; Crous, P.W.; Kema, G.H.J. New endemic *Fusarium* species hitch-hiking with pathogenic *Fusarium* strains causing Panama disease in small-holder banana plots in Indonesia. *Persoonia* **2019**, *43*, 48–69. [CrossRef]

66. Wang, M.M.; Chen, Q.; Diao, Y.Z.; Duan, W.J.; Cai, L. *Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti* complex from China. *Persoonia* **2019**, *43*, 70–89. [CrossRef]

67. Lu, Y.A.; Qiu, J.B.; Wang, S.F.; Xu, J.H.; Ma, G.Z.; Shi, J.R.; Bao, Z.H. Species diversity and toxigenic potential of *Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti* species complex isolates from rice and soybean in China. *Plant Dis.* **2021**, *105*, 2628–2636. [CrossRef]

68. Yi, R.H.; Lian, T.; Su, J.J.; Chen, J. First report of internal black rot on *Carica papaya* fruit caused by *Fusarium sulawesiense* in China. *Plant Dis.* **2022**, *106*, 319. [CrossRef]

69. Lu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Huang, S.; Tang, L.; Chen, X.; Guo, T.; Mo, J.; Ma, L. First report of leaf blight caused by *Fusarium pernambucanum* and *Fusarium sulawesiense* on Plum in Sichuan, China. *Plant Dis.* **2022**. [CrossRef]

70. Araújo, M.B.M.; Moreira, G.M.; Nascimento, L.V.; Nogueira, G.D.; Nascimento, S.R.D.; Pfenning, L.H.; Ambrosio, M.M.D. *Fusarium* rot of melon is caused by several *Fusarium* species. *Plant Pathol.* **2021**, *70*, 712–721. [CrossRef]

71. Urbaniak, M.; Stepien, L.; Uhlig, S. Evidence for naturally produced beauvericins containing N-Methyl-Tyrosine in Hypocreales fungi. *Toxins* **2019**, *11*, 182. [CrossRef]
72. Geiser, D.M.; Jimenez-Gasco, M.D.; Kang, S.C.; Makalowska, I.; Veeraraghavan, N.; Ward, T.J.; Zhang, N.; Kuldau, G.A.; O'Donnell, K. *FUSARIUM*-ID v. 1.0: A DNA sequence database for identifying *Fusarium*. *Eur. J. Plant Pathol.* **2004**, *110*, 473–479. [CrossRef]
73. Wingfield, M.J.; De Beer, Z.W.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, B.D.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Lombard, L.; Crous, P.W. One fungus, one name promotes progressive plant pathology. *Mol. Plant Pathol.* **2012**, *13*, 604–613. [CrossRef]
74. Aiyaz, M.; Thimmappa Divakara, S.; Mudili, V.; George Moore, G.; Kumar Gupta, V.; i Yli-Mattila, T.; Chandra Nayaka, S.; Ramachandrappa Niranjana, S. Molecular diversity of seed-borne *Fusarium* species associated with maize in India. *Curr. Genom.* **2016**, *17*, 132–144. [CrossRef]
75. Gupta, S.; Krasnoff, S.B.; Underwood, N.L.; Renwick, J.A.A.; Roberts, D.W. Isolation of beauvericin as an insect toxin from *Fusarium semitectum* and *Fusarium moniliforme* var. *subglutinans*. *Mycopathologia* **1991**, *155*, 185–189. [CrossRef]
76. Moretti, A.; Logrieco, A.; Bottalico, A.; Ritieni, A.; Fogliano, V.; Randazzo, G. Diversity in beauvericin and fusaproliferin production by different populations of *Gibberella fujikuroi* (*Fusarium* section Liseola). *Sydowia* **1997**, *48*, 44–56.
77. Azliza, I.N.; Hafizi, R.; Nurhazrati, M.; Salleh, B. Production of major mycotoxins by *Fusarium* species isolated from wild grasses in peninsular Malaysia. *Sains Malays.* **2014**, *43*, 89–94.
78. Xu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, P.; Shan, T.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, L. Beauvericin from the endophytic fungus, *Fusarium redolens*, isolated from *Dioscorea zingiberensis* and its antibacterial activity. *Nat. Prod. Commun.* **2010**, *5*, 811–814. [CrossRef]
79. Caicedo, N.H.; Davalos, A.F.; Puente, P.A.; Rodriguez, A.Y.; Caicedo, P.A. Antioxidant activity of exo-metabolites produced by *Fusarium oxysporum*: An endophytic fungus isolated from leaves of *Otoba gracilipes*. *Open Microbiol. J.* **2019**, *8*, e903. [CrossRef]
80. Menezes, B.S.; Solidade, L.S.; Conceição, A.A.; Santos Junior, M.N.; Leal, P.L.; de Brito, E.S.; Canuto, K.M.; Mendonça, S.; de Siqueira, F.G.; Marques, L.M. Pigment production by *Fusarium solani* BRM054066 and determination of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. *AMB Express* **2020**, *10*, 117. [CrossRef]