# Radiocarbon dating of urban secondary carbonate deposit: site effect and implication for chronology

Edwige Pons-Branchu, Ingrid Caffy, Emmanuelle Delque-Količ, Jean-Pascal Dumoulin, Emmanuel Dumont, Sarah Madikita, Gilles Bultez, Daniella Malnar, Gael Monvoisin, Jules Querleux, et al.

► To cite this version:

Edwige Pons-Branchu, Ingrid Caffy, Emmanuelle Delque-Količ, Jean-Pascal Dumoulin, Emmanuel Dumont, et al. Radiocarbon dating of urban secondary carbonate deposit: site effect and implication for chronology: Case study of Paris and Versailles Palace fountains. Radiocarbon, 2022, 64 (6), pp.1323-1332. 10.1017/RDC.2022.78. hal-03918048

HAL Id: hal-03918048

https://cnam.hal.science/hal-03918048

Submitted on 13 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Selected Papers from the 3rd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Gliwice, Poland, 5–9 July 2021
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on
behalf of the University of Arizona.

RADIOCARBON DATING OF URBAN SECONDARY CARBONATE DEPOSITS:
SITE EFFECT AND IMPLICATION FOR CHRONOLOGY: CASE STUDY OF PARIS
AND VERSAILLES PALACE FOUNTAINS

Edwige Pons-Branchu<fnref n="1" />* • Ingrid Caffy<fnref n="2" /> • Emmanuelle Delque-Kolic<fnref n="2" /> •

Jean-Pascal Dumoulin<fnref n="2" /> • Emmanuel Dumont<fnref n="3" /> • Sarah Madikita<fnref n="1" /> • Gilles Bultez<fnref n="4" />

Daniella Malnar<fnref n="4" /> • Gael Monvoisin<fnref n="5" /> • Jules Querleux<fnref n="6" /> • Matthieu Fernandez<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="7" />

Nadine Tisnérat Laborde<fnref n="1" /> • Philippe Branchu<fnref n="3" />

**ABSTRACT.** In urban environments, diachronic evolution of water quality can be reconstructed using geochemical analysis of urban secondary carbonate deposits (USCDs), from urban underground structures, similar to speleothems from natural caves. The use of the radiocarbon bomb peak to build their precise chronology was recently tested in two Paris-area urban sites (France). In this study, new samples from contrasted environments in the Paris region were sampled in order to test the sites' effects on the radiocarbon signal recorded: under wood, under a fountain, in underground aqueducts, in the south and north of Paris. We compared the post-bomb atmospheric radiocarbon record with the one measured at the top of USCDs, and estimated the dead carbon proportion (DCP), between 0 and 40%. USCDs fed by water with a rapid transfer through thin soil (Versailles fountain) had the lowest DCP ($^{14}$C very close to atmospheric one). Highest DCP were found for USCD from deep underground quarry under urban wood, and intermediate ones for USCDs fed by the waters of perched aquifers. These data support the use of radiocarbon as chronometer for USCDs in contrasted urban contexts, and show that it can be used to determine carbon transport and sources, an important parameter for pollution reconstruction.

**KEYWORDS:** bomb peak, fountains, radiocarbon, secondary carbonate deposits, speleothems, urban undergrounds.

INTRODUCTION

Secondary carbonate deposits very similar to the speleothems found in caves can develop in
historical aqueducts or urban underground structures such as technical galleries. These urban
secondary carbonate deposits (USCDs) can be used to reconstruct historical variations in land
use that change the water quality by the input of chemical elements or pollutants (e.g., sulfate
or lead see Pons-Branchu et al. 2015, 2017). A recent study of an indoor USCD in a historical
spa from Budapest (Hungary) highlighted the increasing interest in these deposits in urban or
highly anthropized sites (Virág et al. 2020). Establishing a precise chronology of these natural
archives is challenging, however. The difficulties reside in the presence of a detrital fraction
when using the U/Th technique (Pons-Branchu et al. 2014) and in the presence of dead
carbon, similarly to speleothems from caves when using radiocarbon dating (Goslar et al.
2000; Genty et al. 2001; Noronha et al. 2014). In a previous study, we presented the first
radiocarbon records of the bomb pulse in USCDs sampled in a technical gallery from

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1">¹Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Laboratoire de Mesure du Carbone 14 (LMC14), LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³CEREMA : TEAM - 12 Rue Teisserenc de Bort, 78197 TRAPPES-en-Yvelines Cedex ; and Rue de l'Egalité Prolongée - BP 134, 93352, Le Bourget Cedex 319, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Château de Versailles : Etablissement Public du château, du musée et du domaine national de Versailles. RP 834 – 78008, Versailles Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Laboratoire GEOPS, Université. Paris Saclay – UMR 8148 CNRS – Université Paris Saclay, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶IGC, Inspection générale des Carrières – 86 rue Regnault, 75013, France</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Laboratoire histoire des technosciences en société, EA3716, Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, 2 rue Conté
75003, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote>*Corresponding author. Email: edwige.pons-branchu@lsce.ipsl.fr</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1 Location and selected samples. Left: aerial photo of Paris and surroundings (from Geoportail, © IGN), with location of the studied sites in Paris (1, 2, and 5), Versailles (3), and Cachan (4); right: pictures of selected samples. Nep 2 and 5 from site 3, Run 1 from site 4 and Bra 1 from site 5. Vertical bar is 2 cm.</figcaption></figure>

Versailles Palace gardens and a gallery of a historical aqueduct north of Paris (France). For these two records we showed: (i) fast carbon transfer from the atmosphere to the urban underground; (ii) a high proportion of dead carbon, between 17 and 22%, and (iii) a high damping effect in relation to possible old carbon stored within urban soils and/or the influence of local fossil carbon burning (Pons-Branchu et al. 2018). This previous study demonstrated that radiocarbon can be used in some cases, with the identification of radiocarbon peak bomb, to determine the chronology of USCDs and opened new perspectives for their use as natural archives for past water quality reconstruction. However, the radiocarbon bomb pulse could not always be fully recorded (younger deposits for instance). In this paper, we therefore tested ¹⁴C on very recent (younger than the bomb pulse) USCDs. We compared the ¹⁴C content of 6 sub-actual deposits from 5 underground sites in Paris (France) and the neighboring area. We discuss the factors affecting the dead carbon content and the carbon time transfer within urban or anthropized soils, which could help to understand pollutant transfer through urban soils and structures.

## STUDIED SITES AND CARBONATE DEPOSITS

The locations of the studied sites are presented in Figure 1, and their main characteristics in Table 1.

The sample from the “Saint Martin” site (Paris, site 1 on the map, sample SM B) was already described in a previous study (Pons-Branchu et al. 2018). All the studied samples were “humid” at the top, indicating active growth when sampled.

* Bel 1 is a 5 cm core drilled in 2012, in USCD on the floor of the Belleville aqueduct (site 2 on the map, in the North of Paris). It is laminated. Only the top of the core was studied here. The aqueduct drains water from the Malassis plateau, north of Paris.

* Nep 2 and Nep 5 (Versailles Palace gardens, site 3 on the map) are USCDs from leaks of the fountain of the Neptune basin sampled during the year 2017. They are respectively ca. 3.5 and 7 cm high. While only the top of Nep 2 was sampled for analysis, Nep 5 was analyzed all along its section.
<table><caption>Table 1 Main characteristics of the studied sites.</caption><thead><tr><th>Site</th><th>Samples</th><th>Host rock thickness (m)</th><th>Host rock</th><th>Surface</th><th>Water flow</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Brasserie quarry</td><td>Bra 1</td><td>14</td><td>Backfill, Quaternary and Auversian sandstones and clay, Lutetian limestone</td><td>Urban wood</td><td>Drip water (rain infiltration)</td></tr><tr><td>Saint Martin manhole</td><td>SM B</td><td>Aquifer</td><td>Backfill and Brie Travertins (Rupelian)</td><td>Urban</td><td>Spring fed by perched aquifer</td></tr><tr><td>Belleville aqueduct</td><td>Bel 1</td><td>2</td><td>Backfill and Brie Travertins (Rupelian)</td><td>Urban</td><td>Mix drip water/ perched aquifer</td></tr><tr><td>Rungis aqueduct</td><td>Run 1</td><td>Aquifer</td><td>Backfill, Quaternary silts, Brie Travertins (Rupelian)</td><td>Urban</td><td>Spring fed by perched aquifer</td></tr><tr><td>Neptune basin— Versailles</td><td>Nep 2, Nep 5</td><td>1–2</td><td>Anthropogenic backfill</td><td>Garden and fountain</td><td>Drip water (water from the fountain)</td></tr></tbody></table>

* Run 1, a 3.5-cm-high USCD, was sampled in 2019, in the historical Medicis aqueduct, at manhole 10 (site 4 on the map), which for centuries drained water from the Rungis plateau to Paris. It is well laminated and formed by the water of the perched aquifer drained by the aqueduct.

* Bras 1 is a 1.3-cm-high USCD, sampled in 2014, in the former “Brasserie” quarry (limestone for the construction of Parisian mansions), below the “Bois de Vincennes”, a wood in urban context (site 5 on the map).

# METHODS

## Laminae Counting

In previous studies (Pons-Branchu et al. 2014, 2015, 2018), the comparison between laminae counting and radiometric dating demonstrated that in Belleville aqueduct (including the Saint-Martin manhole) and in the Versailles technical gallery, lamination of the four studied USCDs is bi-annual, as already demonstrated for speleothems from natural caves in Europe (Baker et al. 1993; Shopov et al. 1994). This may be different for USCDs from fountain leakages as the fountains regularly undergo emptying (for cleaning, repairs, etc.) or full operation of the water jets. Thus, laminae counting was performed for samples Run 1 and Bras 1 but not for the samples from Versailles Palace fountains.

For samples Run 1 and Bras 1, the method used is the one described in Pons-Branchu et al. (2015 and 2018), with the counting of visible laminae on enlarged photos of polished sections.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Figure 2 Pictures of the studied sites: (a) historical fountain of Saint Martin Manhole with CaCO₃ crust (sample SM B); (b) Rungis aqueduct, south of Paris, with sample Run1 at the time of its collection in a water inlet; (c) Belleville aqueduct in northern Paris, and Bel 1 sample at the time of its collection; (d) Brasserie former quarry, with the red carbonate crust sampled (Bra 1 sample); (e) under the Neptune basin, Versailles Palace Gardens, Nep 2 sample, deposited on a pipe, by the fountain and basin leakages. (Please see online version for color figures.)

The difference in the number of laminae between the various counts was used as the error bar for derived age.

## Radiocarbon Analysis

CaCO₃ samples of ca. 10 mg were cut using a little diamond saw. They were cleaned, hydrolyzed with H₃PO₄ to get CO₂ and converted to graphite as described by Tisnérat-Laborde et al. (2001) and by Dumoulin et al. (2017). They were then measured at the Artemis AMS-facility (CEA Saclay, LMC14; Moreau et al. 2020). The ¹⁴C measurements were corrected from the isotopic fractionation according to the ¹³C values measured on the AMS Artemis facility, and from the blank following international recommendations (Mook and van der Plicht 1999).

## RESULTS

Laminae counting: Run 1 and Bras 1 samples displayed respectively 98 ± 6 and 63 ± 6 laminae, indicating 49 ± 3 and 31.5 ± 3 years for their growing period assuming a bi-annual laminae deposition. Laminae width is between 0.5 and 1 mm for laminae doublet for Run 1 sample (see Figure 3), and 0.3 to 0.5 mm for those of Bra 1.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Figure 3 Picture of polished section of Run 1 sample used for the laminae counting.</figcaption></figure>

¹⁴C (see Figure 4 and Table 2) measured on the USCDs, expressed as Fraction of modern carbon (Fm) ranged from 0.6169 ± 0.0018 to 1.1136 ± 0.0026.

For samples Bel 1 and Nep 2 (only the top was analyzed), age was determined according to the sampling year and an assumption of a 6-year period of growth for the level sampled, corresponding to a sample of 10–12 laminae. For samples Run 1 and Bra 1, the ages reported are those from laminae counting. The age of the SM B sample is that already published in Pons-Branchu et al. (2018). For Nep 2, we directly correlated the ¹⁴C measured on the CaCO₃ samples according to atmospheric values.

Accordingly, all the samples analyzed are younger than the year 1970 (see Table 2).

DISCUSSION

¹⁴C in speleothems contains atmospheric derived carbon, but also dead carbon from host rock dissolution, and from carbon from decomposition of old organic matter stored in the soil. In speleothems, the range value of dead carbon proportion (DCP) is from 0 to 50% (Hendy 1971), with typical values between 5 and 20% in European karstic systems not covered by a major source of old carbon such as peat bog (Genty et al. 2001). In USCDs, local anthropic carbon (black carbon and Suess effect) could also potentially play an important role as evidenced for atmospheric radiocarbon (Awsiuk and Pazdur 1986). Our previous study on USCD from the Belleville aqueduct (Saint-Martin manhole) and Versailles technical gallery that recorded the radiocarbon bomb pulse showed a DCP between 17 and 27%, and fast carbon transfer, but also a damping effect (attenuation of the atmospheric signal), attributed to the presence of a small fraction of carbon coming from old organic matter possibly stored within the soils.

Here, the studied samples, from the same region, cover a large range of contexts and situations, with contrasted water sources and pathways (dripping from the roof of galleries or quarry with different soil and host rock thickness or water from two perched aquifers with identical geological context in a more or less urbanized areas). ¹⁴C values for the USCDs were plotted according to their age and compared to the atmospheric ¹⁴C values (Hua et al.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Figure 4 Radiocarbon (as fraction of modern carbon, Fm) measured within layers of USCDs and compared with atmospheric evolution (“Atmos” curve data from Hua et al. 2013). For comparison, atmospheric data corrected for 10, 20 and 40% of DCP are plotted (labelled respectively “A 10% DCP”, “A 20% DCP”, “A 40% DCP”), following Macario et al. (2019). Blue symbols are for USCDs fed by water from the perched aquifer (flowing waters), green symbols are for USCDs fed from rapid leaks from a fountain (Versailles Palace), and orange symbols are USCD from dripping water in artificial undergrounds (former quarry).

2013). Following Macario et al. (2019) we drew the atmospheric ¹⁴C curve corrected for 10, 20, and 40% of DCP (see Figure 4).

**Carbonate deposits fed by dripping water infiltrating through soil or anthropic structures**

The comparison between the ¹⁴C content measured on USCDs and atmospheric values suggests different behaviors:

* A similar radiocarbon level and trend in samples Nep 2 and Nep 5 are observed, from the Versailles Palace fountains, to atmospheric data, with very low DCP (ca. 0%). It was not possible to provide an independent chronological constraint to test a possible delay in carbon transfer, but this is unlikely here, due to the very fast water transfer (leakages from the fountain or basin) across a thin soil layer. Slight variations were however observed and could be due to the potential impact of local Suess effect. These USCDs may however not be representative of the mean atmosphere of the year, because the fountains are not operated in winter. Indeed, local atmospheric radiocarbon variations has been observed in big cities due fossil carbon burning (domestic heating or industries, Svetlik et al. 2010), with seasonal variations.

* At the other extreme, Bras 1 speleothem, fed by water dripping from the roof of the former quarry “La Brasserie” covered by 14 m of soil and host rock, has the highest DCP (ca. 40%, see Figure 4), with the shape of the ¹⁴C decrease with time (here well dated by laminae counting) very close to that of the atmosphere. This behavior suggests a rapid time
<table><caption>Table 2 Radiocarbon data for the USCD samples. Data from samples SM B are from Pons-Branchu et al. (2018).</caption><thead><tr><th>Lab number</th><th>Sample</th><th>δ<sup>13</sup>C</th><th>Fm</th><th>Err Fm</th><th>mm/Top</th><th>Year (AD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SacA55096</td><td>Bra 1 - 15</td><td>-9.30</td><td>0.6169</td><td>± 0.0018</td><td>0</td><td>2015 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA55095</td><td>Bra 1 - 13</td><td>-10.30</td><td>0.6568</td><td>± 0.0019</td><td>2</td><td>2011 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA55094</td><td>Bra 1 - 10</td><td>-9.10</td><td>0.6680</td><td>± 0.0020</td><td>5</td><td>2005 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA55093</td><td>Bra 1 - 7</td><td>-9.40</td><td>0.6823</td><td>± 0.0019</td><td>8</td><td>1999 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA55092</td><td>Bra 1 - 4</td><td>-10.10</td><td>0.7322</td><td>± 0.0020</td><td>11</td><td>1993 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA55091</td><td>Bra 1 - 1</td><td>-9.50</td><td>0.7753</td><td>± 0.0021</td><td>14</td><td>1987 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54880</td><td>Nep 5 - a</td><td>-33.9</td><td>0.9992</td><td>± 0.0024</td><td>0.1</td><td>2013 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54881</td><td>Nep 5 - b</td><td>-34.8</td><td>1.0281</td><td>± 0.0024</td><td>5.5</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54882</td><td>Nep 5 - c</td><td>-34.2</td><td>1.0397</td><td>± 0.0026</td><td>15.5</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54883</td><td>Nep 5 - d</td><td>-27.7</td><td>1.0932</td><td>± 0.0025</td><td>33.5</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54884</td><td>Nep 5 - e</td><td>-33.4</td><td>1.0939</td><td>± 0.0027</td><td>49.5</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54885</td><td>Nep 5 - f</td><td>-31.4</td><td>1.1136</td><td>± 0.0026</td><td>69.5</td><td>1991</td></tr><tr><td>SacA54886</td><td>Nep 5 - g</td><td>-23</td><td>1.0955</td><td>± 0.0023</td><td>78.8</td><td>1987</td></tr><tr><td>SacA53158 /GifA18180</td><td>Nep 2 - 7</td><td>-28.3</td><td>1.0197</td><td>± 0.0024</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61124</td><td>Run 1 -0-C14</td><td>-15.10</td><td>0.9194</td><td>± 0.0022</td><td>0.2</td><td>2019 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61125</td><td>Run 1 -1-C14</td><td>-13.20</td><td>0.9173</td><td>± 0.0023</td><td>1</td><td>2017 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61126</td><td>Run 1 -3-C14</td><td>-15.80</td><td>0.9247</td><td>± 0.0022</td><td>3</td><td>2014 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61127</td><td>Run 1 -6-C14</td><td>-16.30</td><td>0.9275</td><td>± 0.0019</td><td>11</td><td>2000 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61128</td><td>Run 1 -8-C14</td><td>-14.50</td><td>0.9459</td><td>± 0.0020</td><td>14</td><td>1994 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61129</td><td>Run 1 -10-C14</td><td>-15.40</td><td>0.9405</td><td>± 0.0024</td><td>19</td><td>1986 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61130</td><td>Run 1 -12-C14</td><td>-24.00</td><td>0.9483</td><td>± 0.0023</td><td>22</td><td>1981 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA61131</td><td>Run 1 -14-C14</td><td>-18.60</td><td>0.9775</td><td>± 0.0020</td><td>26</td><td>1973 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA60413</td><td>Bel 1 -0-1</td><td>-10.30</td><td>0.8289</td><td>± 0.0021</td><td>0.5</td><td>2009 ± 3</td></tr><tr><td>SacA42716/GifA15243</td><td>SM B-0-1</td><td>-15.76</td><td>0.7316</td><td>± 0.0021</td><td>0.5</td><td>2010 ± 2.5</td></tr><tr><td>SacA42717/GifA15244</td><td>SM B-6-8</td><td>-10.05</td><td>0.8495</td><td>± 0.0022</td><td>7</td><td>1986 ± 2.5</td></tr></tbody></table>

transfer of carbon, with a high contribution of carbon from the host rock, but no/a low contribution from the potential pool of old organic matter such as that observed for some speleothems from natural caves overlain by forests (e.g., Rudzka-Phillips et al. 2013; Noronha et al. 2015) or for other samples studied here.

## Carbonate deposits fed by flowing water from a perched urban aquifer

USCDs fed by water from a perched aquifer (Belleville aqueduct, north of Paris, samples Bel 1 and SM, and Medicis aqueduct, south of Paris, sample Run 1) display interesting features. Both perched aquifers display a similar geological context with waters infiltrating through Oligocene/ Eocene sedimentary layers, but contrasted soil occupation. While the Belleville aqueduct watershed has been highly urbanized since the mid-19th century, with high waterproofing of the surface (Franck-Néel et al. 2015), this is not the case for the watershed of the Medicis aqueduct, which was urbanized very recently in the upper part of the watershed, during the last 60 years, and not completely: part on it still drains cultivated soils.

For its top half, Run 1 USCD (Medicis Aqueduct) displays higher ¹⁴C values than the USCDs from Belleville aqueduct (SM B and Bel 1), suggesting a lower DCP contribution for the recent
part (ca. 20 years according to age based on laminae counting). This difference is consistent
with the Belleville aqueduct draining waters from a watershed with high waterproofing
(and thus possibly low time transfer and more C dissolution from the host rock). The Run
1 radiocarbon record displays however a time record that does not follow the ¹⁴C
atmospheric trend (see Figure 4) as observed for the other samples.

This may be due to (1) a biased lamina-based chronology, with older sub samples of Run 1
being younger than the proposed age; or (2) the existence of a pool of old carbon (organic
matter from the soil) whose contribution becomes lower over time, possibly due to the
recent and increasing urbanization of the zone.

In order to mimic the atmospheric tendency with Run 1 data, sub-samples would have to be
twice as young; this would suggest a lamina deposition rate of ca. 4 laminae per year for this
sample. Even if the hypothesis of a different deposition mode could be proposed to explain this
rate, this is unlikely here. We suggest that there is a pool of old carbon stored within the soil
which shifts the carbon trend, as shown in Noronha et al. (2015) or Carlson et al. (2019) for
speleothems from caves (old “mean respired carbon ages”—MRCA—as defined in their
studies). This is consistent with the presence of historical and present day cultivated fields
within the watershed drained by the Medicis aqueduct.

IMPLICATION FOR THE STUDY OF THE SOURCE OF HISTORICAL WATER
CONTAMINATION

The use of USCDs in urban underground structures as tracers of past water quality is linked to the knowledge of the interaction of water with soil and host rock and is site dependent. This is of particular interest when studying organic matter content or organic contaminants that could be trapped in these USCDs such as found in speleothems from caves (e.g., Quiers et al. 2015). In fact, our approach suggests that carbon transfer can be more or less rapid, and the recorded signal more or less buffered by old carbon. Thus, when using USCDs as an archive of past (carbon) pollution, attention should be paid to the possible effect of an old carbon pool stored within soils.

The other important implication is the link between metal storage and transfer from soil to USCDs, in association with organic matter. Here again, a possible delay between pollution emission and its record within some USCDs (as found in previous studies such as the lead historical record, see Pons-Branchu et al. 2015) may be possible in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

USCDs in urban underground structures (galleries, aqueducts, quarries, etc.) are useful for the
study of the impact on soil occupation on water quality, but the determination of their precise
chronology remains in most cases challenging. Radiocarbon data on recent (younger than the
year 1970) carbonate deposits from contrasted locations in the Paris region showed that this
method can be used for the post-bomb period, but that it is in some cases hampered by the
potential presence of old organic matter previously stored in soil and added to the
atmospheric signal and that from host rock dissolution (dead carbon, DCP). The data
showed that carbonate deposits from leakages from a Versailles Palace fountain display ¹⁴C
values very close to atmospheric ones and can be used without correction for dead carbon,
while USCDs in a former deep quarry display high dead carbon but no damping effect or
effect of an old organic matter pool. The comparison between USCDs deposited by water
from two perched aquifers highlights the importance of soil occupation for the water pathway and the geochemical signal recorded. This comparison suggests that USCDs deposited with waters from an aquifer with a partly cultivated watershed contain a non-negligible amount of carbon from old organic matter, which should be considered when reconstructing pollution history using these natural archives.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the “Services des Fontaines” of Versailles Palace, to the “Inspection Générale des Carrières” of Ville de Paris, and to ASNEP for site access and discussion. We thank the LMC14 staff (Laboratoire de Mesure du Carbone-14), the ARTEMIS national facility, for the results obtained with the accelerator mass spectroscopy method. This work was funded by the Fondation des Sciences du Patrimoine/LabEx Patrima (ANR-10-LABX0094-01) for the Versailles case study and by the HUNIWERS project funded by ANR (ANR-18-CE22-0009) for the others.

## REFERENCES

Awsiuk R, Pazdur MF. 1986. Regional Suess effect in the Upper Silesia urban area. Radiocarbon 28(2A):655-660.

Baker A, Smart PL, Edwards RL, Richards DA. 1993. Annual growth banding in a cave stalagmite. Nature 364(6437):518-520

Carlson PE, Banner JL, Johnson KR, Casteel RC, Breecker DO. 2019. Carbon cycling of subsurface organic matter recorded in speleothem ¹⁴C records: maximizing bomb-peak model fidelity. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 246:436-449.

Dumoulin JP, Comby-Zerbino C, Delqué-Količ E, Moreau C, Caffy I, Hain S, Perron M, Thellier B, Setti V, Berthier B, Beck L. 2017. Status report on sample preparation protocols developed at the LMC14 Laboratory, Saclay, France: from sample collection to ¹⁴C AMS measurement. Radiocarbon 59(3):713-726.

Franck-Néel C, Borst W, Diome C, Branchu P. 2015. Mapping the land use history for protection of soils in urban planning: what reliable scales in time and space? J. Soils Sediments 15:1687-1704.

Genty D, Baker A, Massault M, Proctor C, Pons-Branchu E, Hamelin B. 2001. Dead carbon in stalagmites: carbonates bedrocks vs ageing of soil organic matter. Implications for ¹³C variations in speleothems. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65(20):3443-3457.

Goslar T, Hercman H, Pazdur A, 2000. Comparison of U-series and radiocarbon dates of speleothems. Radiocarbon 42(3):403-414.

Hendy CH. 1971. The isotopic geochemistry of speleothems—I. The calculation of the effects of different modes of formation on the isotopic composition of speleothems and their applicability as palaeoclimatic indicators. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta 35(8):801-824.

Hua Q, Barbetti M, Rakowski AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):2059–2072.

Macario KD, Stríkis NM, Cruz FW, Hammerschlag I, Alves EQ, Novello VF, Edwards L, Cheng H, Andrade FRD, Buarquec PFSM, Garbelim JAS. 2019. Assessing the dead carbon proportion of a modern speleothem from central Brazil. Quaternary Geochronology 52:29–36.

Mook WG, van der Plicht J. 1999. Reporting ¹⁴C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3): 227–239.

Moreau C, Messager C, Berthier B, Hain S, Thellier B, Dumoulin JP, Caffy I, Sieudat M, Beck L, 2020. ARTEMIS, the ¹⁴C AMS facility of the LMC14 National Laboratory: a status report on quality control and microsample procedures. Radiocarbon 62:1755–1770.

Noronha AL, Johnson KR, Hu C, Ruan J, Southon JR, Ferguson JE. 2014. Assessing influences on speleothem dead carbon variability over the Holocene: implications for speleothem-based radiocarbon calibration. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 394:20–29.

Noronha AL, Johnson KR, Southon JR, Hu C, Ruan J, McCabe-Glynn S. 2015. Radiocarbon evidence for decomposition of aged organic matter in the vadose zone as the main source of speleothem carbon. Quaternary Science Reviews 127:37–47.

Pons-Branchu E, Bergonzini L, Tisnérat-Laborde N, Branchu P, Dumont E, Massault M, Bultez G, Malnar D, Kaltnecker E, Dumoulin JP, Noret A, Pelletier N, Roy-Barman M. 2018. ¹⁴C in urban speleothem-like deposits: a new tool for environmental study. Radiocarbon 60(4):1269–1281.

Pons-Branchu E, Ayrault S, Roy-Barman M, Bordier L, Borst W, Branchu P, Douville E,
Dumont E. 2015. Three centuries of heavy metal pollution in Paris (France) recorded by urban speleothems. Science of the Total Environment 15:86-96.

Pons-Branchu E, Douville E, Roy-Barman M, Dumont E, Branchu E, Thil F, Frank N, Bordier L, Borst W. 2014. A geochemical perspective on Parisian urban history based on U-Th dating, laminae counting and yttrium and REE concentrations of recent carbonates in underground aqueducts. Quaternary Geochronology 24:44–53.

Pons-Branchu E, Roy-Barman M, Jean-Soro L, Guillerme A, Branchu P, Fernandez M, Dumont E, Douville E, Michelot JL, Phillips MA. 2017. Urbanization impact on sulfur content of groundwater revealed by the study of urban speleothems: case study in Paris, France. Science of the Total Environment 579:124–132.

Quiers M, Perrette Y, Chalmin E, Fanget B, Poulenard J. 2015. Geochemical mapping of organic carbon in stalagmites using liquid-phase and solid-phase fluorescence. Chemical Geology 411:240–247.

Rudzka-Phillips D, McDermott F, Jackson A, Fleitmann D. 2013. Inverse modelling of the ¹⁴C bomb pulse in stalagmites to constrain the dynamics of soil carbon cycling at selected European cave sites. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta 112:32–51.

Shopov YY, Ford DC, Schwarz HP. 1994. Luminescent microbanding in speleothems—high-resolution chronology and paleoclimate. Geology 22:407–410.

Svetlik I, Povinec PP, Molnár M, Vána M, Šivo A, Bujtás T. 2010. Radiocarbon in the air of central Europe: Long-term investigations. Radiocarbon 52(2):823–834.

Tisnérat-Laborde N, Poupeau JJ, Tannau JF, Paterne M. 2001. Development of a semi-automated system for routine preparation of carbonate samples. Radiocarbon 43(2A):299–304.

Virág M, Molnár M, Braun M, Mindszenty A. 2020. Investigation of a flowstone-like historical indoor-travertine (Rudas Spa, Budapest, Hungary) using the ¹⁴C “bomb-peak”. Radiocarbon 62(5): 1419–1435.