# Essential steps in primary care management of older people with Type 2 diabetes: an executive summary on behalf of the European geriatric medicine society (EuGMS) and the European diabetes working party for older people (EDWPOP) collaboration

Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson, Stefania Maggi, Ahmed Abdelhafiz, Sri Bellary, Jacopo Demurtas, Angus Forbes, Philip Ivory, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas, Cornel Sieber, Timo Strandberg, et al.

► To cite this version:

Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson, Stefania Maggi, Ahmed Abdelhafiz, Sri Bellary, Jacopo Demurtas, et al. Essential steps in primary care management of older people with Type 2 diabetes: an executive summary on behalf of the European geriatric medicine society (EuGMS) and the European diabetes working party for older people (EDWPOP) collaboration. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2023, 35 (11), pp.2279-2291. 10.1007/s40520-023-02519-3. hal-04288463

HAL Id: hal-04288463

https://hal.science/hal-04288463v1

Submitted on 16 Nov 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
# Essential steps in primary care management of older people with Type 2 diabetes: an executive summary on behalf of the European geriatric medicine society (EuGMS) and the European diabetes working party for older people (EDWPOP) collaboration

Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson¹,¹⁷ · Stefania Maggi² · Ahmed Abdelhafiz³ · Sri Bellary⁴ · Jacopo Demurtas⁵ ·

Angus Forbes⁶ · Philip Ivory⁷ · Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas⁸ · Cornel Sieber⁹,¹⁸ · Timo Strandberg¹⁰,¹⁹ ·

Daniel Tessier¹¹,²⁰ · Itziar Vergara¹² · Nicola Veronese¹³ · Andrej Zeyfang¹⁴ · Antoine Christiaens¹⁵,²¹ · Alan Sinclair¹⁶

Received: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published online: 4 September 2023
© The Author(s) 2023

## Abstract

We present an executive summary of a guideline for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care written by the European Geriatric Medicine Society, the European Diabetes Working Party for Older People with contributions from primary care practitioners and participation of a patient’s advocate. This consensus document relies where possible on evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions in the fields where evidences are lacking. The full text includes 4 parts: a general strategy based on comprehensive assessment to enhance quality and individualised care plan, treatments decision guidance, management of complications, and care in case of special conditions. Screening for frailty and cognitive impairment is recommended as well as a comprehensive assessment all health conditions are concerned, including end of life situations. The full text is available online at the following address: essential_steps_inprimary_care_in_older.people_with_diabetes_-_EuGMS-EDWPOP__3_.pdf.

**Keywords** Type diabetes mellitus · Integrative care · Frailty · Prevention · Glucose lowering therapy · Cognitive disorders

## What is new?

* The purpose of the guideline is to be inclusive.

* Both for patients and for the primary care multi-disciplinary team.

* Recommendations focus on safety and early detection of risk for dependence.

* Along with recommendations for escalation of treatment according to patients’ characteristics, criteria for de-escalation are presented.

* When appropriate, frailty and cognitive impairment screening-based interventions are presented.

* Preventative strategies include nutrition and oral health care, exercise, and immunisations.

* Classical complications of diabetes are presented along with new complications including falls, frailty, depression and cognitive disorders.

## Introduction and purpose of the guidelines

This guideline aims to improve standards of diabetes care of older community-based adults with diabetes managed by their primary care team. We expect that each participant of the multi-disciplinary team in primary care including medical practitioners, dieticians, pharmacists, therapists, residential care staff, nurses and specialist diabetes nurses, and finally social workers will find effective support with this guideline. The healthcare stakeholders should also find elements for pathways of care construction adapted to their local and/or regional organization and policies.

This *Guideline* has three main purposes:

(1) Identify a series of recommendations and Best Clinical Practice Statements in key areas that will support health and social care professionals in everyday local primary care settings to manage more effectively the complex issues seen in older adults with diabetes

(2) Arrive at a consensus among European specialists in diabetes and geriatric medicine on how we approach

<footnote>Extended author information available on the last page of the article</footnote>
the management of important issues in managing older people with diabetes

(3) Provide a platform for commissioners of healthcare and policy makers in each nation across the European continent to plan a model care pathway that enhances diabetes care in older people in terms of quality and clinical outcomes.

# 1A Rationale for high quality diabetes care in older people

Across Europe, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent chronic disease, particularly in people older than 65 years. Since 2000 approximatively 50% of people receiving treatment for diabetes in Europe are older than 65 y or 70 y and 25% older than 75 y. The growth of the total adult population with diabetes can average 6% per year [1]. Between 10 [2] and 26% [3] of older people suffer from diabetes with a variable proportion of undiagnosed diabetes.

Diabetes is a long-standing chronic disease with a high personal and public health burden. People with diabetes are at high risk for disability, poor quality of life and increased mortality. This higher risk is observed well into old age.

Finally, the care of people with diabetes represents a very important portion of direct and indirect care costs in Europe. Direct costs accounted for 2.5–6.6% of direct costs and these costs are higher in those with complications or with insulin and particularly due to hospitalisations [4].

# 1B Defining the special needs of the older adults

Older people with T2DM will benefit from locally relevant interdisciplinary diabetes care teams in the community as part of a specific primary care initiative. Focusing on patient's safety, recognising early health deterioration and maintaining independence as longer as possible should minimize avoidable hospital and emergency department admissions and institutionalization. Special attention to quality of life until a dignified death is also necessary for these patients.

Because of the frequent lack of evidence in the treatment of the oldest category of patients, there is also a need to promote high quality clinical research and auditing in the area of diabetes management in the community and primary care setting.

# 1C Who should read this guideline?

Every member of the community-based and primary care teams who has direct care responsibility for older people with diabetes in their local area throughout the European

community. This will also include dieticians, pharmacists, therapists, residential (non-nursing and nursing) care staff, community-based and primary care nurses as well as specialist diabetes nurses where available. This should also include those in health and social care who also provide care for this often vulnerable sector of the diabetes population.

The healthcare stakeholders should also find elements for pathways of care construction adapted to the regional organization and policies.

# 1D Key principles underpinning this guideline (Fig. 1)

= Guidance

Detailed recommendations are available in the EUGMS website (see the online version with the link Essential_steps_inprimary_care_in_older.people_with_diabetes_-_EuGMS-EDWPOP___3_.pdf. This executive summary presents a selection of the most important recommendations (Table 1).

= Preventative actions

A part of the guidance is devoted to prevention with education for health with empowerment of the older subjects and care givers. The strategy includes monitoring of the risk factors markers (blood glucose, blood pressure, lipids and electrocardiogram), heathy and sustainable diet-based avoiding restricted diets and incentive for physical activity, with both endurance and resistance training particularly in frail subjects. Oral health care and immunisations completes the preventative actions.

= Individualised care plan

Owing to the high level of heterogeneity of older people with T2DM health care plan relies on careful assessment of needs. We proposed the use of gerontological and metabolic assessments to define an integrative and individualised care plan constructed and updated with the subject and the multidisciplinary care team. Figure 1 provides an overview of the guiding principles of the guidelines and how they are connected.

Graduation of risk derives from this comprehensive assessment and should support all action decisions.

Update of the care plan is an important issue because T2DM is a long-standing chronic disease and health status and care needs of the subject may varying according to time diabetes care, to intervention on risk factors and frailty or after an acute event. Frailty screening is a major step in the construction of the care plan because frailty may be reversible with targeted interventions on blood glucose and blood pressure control, and nutrition and physical activity. This procedure is in line with the program of the world health organization and named ICOPE (integrated care
for older people, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/
WHO-FWC-ALC-19.1).

= Digital health

Digital health tools are underused in older people prob-
ably due to preconceived ideas and digital divide. We sug-
gest that a diabetes management app for older people should
include the following elements of care and intervention: glu-
cose levels, nutritional plan, exercise plan, blood pressure
record, hypoglycaemia alert messages, help with insulin
dosages, contact telephone and SMS text messaging to GP
practice and community nurses, and sick day rules.

Format and methodology of the Guideline

2A Format and structure

The working group included members of the EuGMS SIG diabetes (European geriatric Medicine Society Special Interest Group diabetes), the EDWPOP (European Diabetes Working Party for Older people), invited general practitioners and Philip Ivory, a patients’ advocate.

The format of the guidance follows the template of the
International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Global Guideline
on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2013) [5]. The full
guidance includes 4 parts after definition of aims, scope and
methodology of the guidelines. In each section and subsec-
tion of the full text rationale and evidences supporting the
recommendations are presented as well as corresponding
key references. Part one details the recommendations that
enhance the practice and quality of primary care manage-
ment of diabetes. The overall preventative strategy, moni-
toring, comprehensive patient assessment, and follow-up

principles are documented. Recommendations for drug treat-
ments are exposed in part 2. The management of complica-
tions in the broad sense and the care of specific situations
that patients may encounter are detailed in parts 3 and 4,
respectively. Finally, the different scales of frailty screening
are presented in the online link via the EuGMS website.

2B Search methodology

The primary strategy attempted to locate any relevant sys-
tematic reviews or meta-analyses, or randomised controlled
and controlled trials. However, as discussed above, there
were inherent limitations to this approach due to the lack of
available clinical trial or observation data in this field.

The following databases were examined: Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Trials Register, CINAHL, and Science Citation. Hand searching of at least 12 major diabetes and ageing/geriatric medicine journals was also undertaken by the Writing Group. The searches were limited to English language citations over the previous 15 years. The research was last updated in December 2022.

2C Grading recommendations

Considering the available evidence and the consensus of the
experts, recommendations are graded according four catego-
ries as follows:

* 4A—Higher strength—evidence from meta-analyses/
systematic reviews of RCTs, RCTs with low risk of bias

* 3A—Moderate strength—evidence from RCTs with a higher risk of bias, systematic reviews of well-conducted cohort or case control studies

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Overview of the guiding principles of individualised care plan dynamic design</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1** Summary of recommendations</caption><caption>Recommendations that Enhance the Practice and Quality of Primary Care Management of Diabetes</caption><tbody><tr><td>Aims of care</td><td>We suggest that the aims of care should be aligned with the health and social needs of the person with diabetes and be based on an evaluation of functional status and comorbidity profile including a comprehensive geriatric assessment using a precision medicine approach. (1A)</td></tr><tr><td>Monitoring</td><td>We suggest that a patient-centred and individualised care plan needs to be updated at regular intervals and its importance clearly explained to the patient. (1A)<br>The prevailing level of glycaemia of an older person with diabetes is of utmost importance. We recommend a HbA1c target of 53–58 mmol/mol (7–7.5%) in someone without frailty or dementia and without significant associated medical comorbidities. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Screening and Diagnosis</td><td>We suggest that self-monitoring of blood glucose should be considered in the following groups:<br>Older people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. (2A)<br>Oder people with diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic therapy that have high hypoglycaemic risk potential. (2A)<br>Older patients with diabetes on any hypoglycaemic therapy but having frequent episodes of hypoglycaemia. (2A)<br>We suggest that continuous glucose monitoring should be considered in patients with significant glycaemic variability. (2A)<br>A diagnosis of T2DM is based on at least 2 fasting blood glucose measures ≥ 7 mmol/l or any-time blood glucose ≥ 11 mmol/l. An HbA1c value ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) may also be used to diagnose T2DM but fasting glycaemia should always be determined. (World Health Organization, WHO) (4A)<br>In the presence of rapidly increasing symptomatic glycaemia, an autoimmune form of DM (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in the Adult, LADA) should be suspected and confirmed with measure of anti-insulin antibodies. (3A)<br>Screening for diabetes must be considered in the following circumstances: delirium and/or vascular dementia, repeated infections specially mycosis, high dose treatment with corticosteroids, presence of macrovascular conditions (coronary, cerebrovascular, peripheral) or significant microvascular conditions (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy), autonomic abnormalities, prolonged treatment with atypical antipsychotics, progressive weight loss and frailty. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Lifestyle and Prevention of Diabetes including Immunisation</td><td>We recommend achieving ideal body weight and physical exercise for 150 min per week to delay the onset of diabetes mellitus. (4A)<br>Patients should be given the possibility to participate in adapted educational programmes focused on wishes and needs of the older patient. (3A)<br>Physical exercise is mandatory for older persons with diabetes and should contain elements of prevention of frailty and falls. We recommend resistance exercise training combined with protein rich diet (if renal function is satisfactory) to maintain muscle function. (3A)<br>We suggest that all older people with diabetes particularly those residents in care homes or who have frailty or significant medical comorbidities be considered for vaccination for the following: influenza, pneumococcal disease, COVID-19, herpes zoster, tetanus, pertussis, and diphtheria. (1A)<br>We recommend prevention, screening and early treatment of periodontal diseases and general education on oral hygiene in older people with diabetes. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehensive functional evaluation</td><td>We recommend that comprehensive functional evaluation, which involves assessment of physical function and screening for frailty, should be incorporated in the routine primary care for older people with diabetes. (3A)<br>We recommend that the tools for physical function assessment and frailty screening should be clinically validated, easy to do, quick to perform and do not require professional staff involvement. (3A)<br>We recommend that patients with physical dysfunction or identified as pre-frail or frail should receive further medical assessment and appropriate interventions. (3A)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1** (continued)</caption><caption>Recommendations that Enhance the Practice and Quality of Primary Care Management of Diabetes</caption><thead><tr><th>Treatment Recommendations</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Managing cardiovascular risk</td><td>In older people with diabetes, general lifestyle and management recommendations apply: smoking cessation, heart healthy diet and increased physical activity; hypertension and dyslipidaemia must be treated with individualized goals and preventive purposes. (4A)<br/>Patients should be trained to identify an irregular pulse, and annual ECG can be recommended for people with diabetes because of increased risk of atrial fibrillation. In case of no contra-indications, direct-acting anticoagulants should be preferred to warfarin. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Glucose regulation with oral and non-insulin injectable agents</td><td>In the absence of significant cardiovascular disease and/or chronic renal disease, we recommend metformin as a first line therapy in older people with diabetes due to its low risk of hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular safety. (3A)<br/>We recommend the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors particularly in subjects with frailty due to their low risk of hypoglycaemia and a reasonable side-effect safety profile. (3A)<br/>We recommend the use of the sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) due to their lower risk of hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular benefit as part of an escalation in therapy. SGLT-2 inhibitors also have additional renal benefits. (4A)<br/>We suggest that GLP-1Ra and SGLT-2 inhibitors are best avoided in frail older people who may have significant weight loss and anorexia. (1A)<br/>We recommend regular monitoring of renal function during metformin, SGLT-2 and GLP-1Ra therapy to avoid the risk of acute kidney injury and dehydration. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Insulin therapy</td><td>Switching to treatment with insulin is suggested in failure of oral treatment to control diabetes relative contra-indications to oral treatment (e.g., renal insufficiency)<br/>To reduce adverse events from treatment including polypharmacotherapy. (1A)<br/>We suggest the use of long-acting basal insulin given once daily where there are stable meal patterns and little evidence of frailty. (1A)<br/>We suggest the use of twice daily combination or pre-mixed insulin where a once daily insulin regimen fails to achieve targets. (2A)<br/>In the long term, addition of short-acting insulin at one or more meal times, as part of a basal-bolus approach may be necessary to achieve blood glucose control. (3A)<br/>We suggest the cautious use of insulin-GLP-1 Ra combinations to avoid having complex insulin regimens. (2A)<br/>Testing of cognition, visual acuity and fine motor skills is recommended in older persons who self-inject insulin. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Hypoglycaemia Avoidance</td><td>We recommend that all older people should have regular medicines reviews to assess potential hypoglycaemic risks. This should include: minimising exposure to sulphonylureas (particularly long-acting agents; using low risk insulin regimens such as once daily NPH or long-acting analogue; and reducing polypharmacy. (3A)<br/>We suggest that systematic approaches to identify older people at risk of hypoglycaemia should be considered, and where possible, integrated with the monitoring of severe hypoglycaemic events ((ambulance call outs, emergency department attendance or hospital admission). (1A)</td></tr><tr><td>Deprescribing and de-escalation of glucose-lowering therapy</td><td>We suggest that deprescribing antidiabetic drugs should be considered if the patient's glycated haemoglobin level falls below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), or below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) in the presence of frailty. (1A)<br/>We suggest that older adults with type 2 diabetes who have dementia, moderate to severe frailty, significant renal impairment, high levels of multimorbidity, etc. (see Box 1) may particularly benefit from a de-prescribing policy. (1A)<br/>We suggest that older adults with type 2 diabetes and frequent hypoglycaemia on complex insulin regimens should be reviewed for consideration of de-prescribing. (2A)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Blood pressure regulation</td><td>Physical activity and sensible control of weight (avoiding malnutrition and sarcopenia) must be promoted in older patients with diabetes to prevent or manage hypertension. (3A)<br>Community-living, older hypertensive patients, with diabetes, who are functionally independent, and in a stable condition can be treated according to current international recommendations for non-diabetic people older than 65 years. (4A)<br>The goal for treatment in well-functioning older people with diabetes may be as low as SBP &lt; 120 mmHg but in moderately frail subjects a benefit can be achieved with higher SBP goals (up to 150 mmHg). (4A)<br>First line drugs are ACE inhibitors/ ARBs, calcium blockers or diuretics. Beta-blockers are second-line drugs and indicated when the patient has coronary disease, heart failure or permanent atrial fibrillation. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Plasma lipid regulation</td><td>In subjects with no history of cardiovascular disease, a statin should be offered to patients with an abnormal lipid profile (high LDL and/or abnormal HDL) when their life-expectancy (determined by their functional status) is over 5 years. (2A)<br>In subjects with no history of cardiovascular disease but a life-expectancy lower than 5 years (very frail patients or very old patients, &gt; 84 years), we suggest that lipid-lowering therapy should only be considered under specialist advice because of the relative lack of benefit in those with diabetes after age 84 years. (2A)<br>A fibrate should be considered in patients with an abnormal lipid profile who have been treated with a statin for at least 6 months but in whom the triglyceride level remains elevated (≥ 2.3 mmol/l). (2A)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital Health and Diabetes Care</td><td>We suggest that all able older people with diabetes receive education and instruction to use a diabetes-management app on a mobile phone, tablet, or computer to support their personalised diabetes care plan. (1A)<br>Tele-medicine consultations should be proposed for older people with limited access to medical care to improve diabetes control without an undue increased risk of hypoglycaemia. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Complications</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Management of acute illness including COVID-19</td><td>Blood glucose must be kept within agreed target ranges to decrease the risk of any infection or the risk of severe COVID-19 infection (5–9 mmol/l if safe to do so, or 6–10 mmol/l generally). (2A)<br>We suggest that the frequency of monitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure should be agreed and undertaken as a minimum twice daily (blood glucose) and daily (blood pressure). (2A)<br>With T2DM, we suggest that corticosteroid treatment needs close monitoring and frequent correction of blood glucose, Na and K, and the state of hydration must be monitored. (2A)</td></tr><tr><td>Depressive illness and mood states</td><td>The assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms in older people with diabetes can be performed on an annual basis using validated assessment tools such as the short form Geriatric Depression Score or the PHQ-9. (3A)<br>Pharmacological treatment of depression in older patients with diabetes should be tailored with consideration of the side effects of antidepressant medications on metabolic outcomes, such as weight gain. (3A)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1** (continued)</caption><caption>Recommendations that Enhance the Practice and Quality of Primary Care Management of Diabetes</caption><tbody><tr><td>Diabetes, Cognitive dysfunction and Dementia</td><td>We suggest that at the time of diagnosis and at regular intervals thereafter, patients aged 70 years and over should be screened for the presence of cognitive impairment using a structured approach (including use of age-, language-, culturally validated screening tools such as the MoCA, MiniCog, MiniMental State Examination Score). (2A)<br/>The detection of frailty and complex multimorbid profiles may help to identify older people with diabetes at greater risk of developing cognitive impairment. (3A)<br/>Prevention of repeated hypoglycaemia in older patients with diabetes may decrease the risk of developing cognitive impairment or dementia. (2A)</td></tr><tr><td>Vascular disease</td><td>Optimal glucose and blood pressure regulation should be aimed for in older patients with diabetes to maintain cognitive performance and improve learning and memory. (3A)<br/>Several interventions including adapted self-management curricula, problem-solving and behavioural interventions may play a role in managing older adults with type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment (3A)<br/>Prevention of stroke in diabetes includes comprehensive treatment of risk factors, hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoking, and anticoagulation in case of atrial fibrillation or antiplatelet drug in secondary prevention. <i>Please note:</i> <i>routine antiplatelet therapy in diabetes without clinical vascular disease is not recommended.</i> (4A)<br/>In older people with diabetes, diabetic kidney disease can progress rapidly, and renal function should be assessed annually. (4A)<br/>ACE inhibitors/ARBs are indicated for prevention and treatment of diabetic kidney disease in older people with diabetes. (4A)<br/>In view of favourable reno-protective effects, SGLT2-inhibitors should be used independently of their hypoglycaemic effect to prevent worsening of renal function. (4A)<br/>We recommend a multidisciplinary foot approach to diabetic foot disease for advanced lesion rescue. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Visual Loss</td><td>We recommend that older people should have a full ophthalmological examination which includes visual acuity and retinal photography on the initial diagnosis of diabetes and annually thereafter. (3A)<br/>We suggest the use of mobile optometric service or digital tele-retinal imaging for care homes residents or less mobile older people. (1A)</td></tr><tr><td>Women's sexual health and erectile dysfunction</td><td>We suggest that older persons with diabetes should benefit from sexual dysfunction screening with the use of questionnaires assessment using the International Inventory of Erectile Function in men and Female Sexual Function Index in women. (1A)<br/>Older men with diabetes with erectile dysfunction should be offered a treatment with an oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor. In case of insufficient response, a vacuum erection device should be proposed. (4A)</td></tr><tr><td>Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain</td><td>At the time of diagnosis and annually thereafter older patients with diabetes should be questioned about symptoms of neuropathy and examined for the presence of peripheral neuropathy using a 128 Hz tuning fork for vibration and a 10 g Semmes-Weinstein mono filament test for pressure perception. (3A)<br/>Pregabalin can be used for painful diabetic neuropathy, starting at the lowest dose and then slowly increased to reach effectiveness with minimized side-effects. (4A)<br/>Duloxetine can be considered as an alternative treatment for diabetes-related neuropathic pain. Other antidepressants are not recommended in this indication. (4A)<br/>In those older people with diabetes who are not able to communicate well, we suggest that the use of an instrument to detect early peripheral nerve damage (e.g., Neuropad) which does not rely on verbal response may be helpful. (2A)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1 (continued)**</caption><caption>Recommendations that Enhance the Practice and Quality of Primary Care Management of Diabetes</caption><tbody><tr><td>Falls and Immobility</td><td>All older adults with T2DM should have access to appropriate nutritional and exercise interventions, according to their level of functional status: correcting low vitamin D levels would improve muscle strength and decrease the frequency of falls. (3A)<br/>Patients with repeated falls should receive a multifactorial risk assessment, with the inclusion of a Frailty Measurement. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Special Categories</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Housebound and Frail</td><td>Those patients with selected functional, cognitive, nutritional impairments, at risk of pressure sores or of complications due to polypharmacy should undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment tool (e.g., the Multidimensional Prognostic Index) [24] by a clinician to detect and treat underlying reversible conditions, such as malnutrition, anaemia, or depression. (3A)<br/>We recommend a multimodal intervention (resistance exercise, nutritional education, optimizing medical treatment) in the medical management of frailty in type 2 diabetes. (3A)</td></tr><tr><td>Avoiding Hospitalisation</td><td>Comprehensive management of diabetes and comorbidity decreases the risk of unplanned hospitalisations. (3A)<br/>Hypoglycaemia risk must be assessed in all older patients with diabetes to minimize unnecessary admission to hospital. (3A)<br/>We suggest that close working between the primary care team and care home staff should identify at-risk residents for hospital admissions and take appropriate measures such as assessing hypoglycaemic risk, frailty, and setting glucose targets to reduce unplanned admissions. (1A)</td></tr><tr><td>Care Home Management of diabetes</td><td>In view of the high rate of undiagnosed diabetes in care home residents at the time of admission to a care home, each resident requires to be screened for the presence of diabetes, and have annual screens for diabetes. (3A)<br/>At the time of admission to a care home, we suggest that each resident with diabetes should be screened for cognitive and physical impairment including frailty as they are at higher risk to progression to disability. (2A)<br/>Residents on insulin or insulin secretagogues must have a hypoglycaemic risk assessment, and screened regularly for the presence of hypoglycaemia symptoms. (3A)<br/>We suggest that a range of interventions can be considered to assist management of care home residents with diabetes such as adherence to clinical practice guidelines, de-escalation of therapy, medical optimisation and resident education, teleconsultation between specialist and care staff, and the use of basal bolus insulin regimens or basal insulin regimen only. (2A)</td></tr><tr><td>End of life diabetes care</td><td>We suggest that interventions in diabetes end of life care in older people need to be tailored to patient preferences and aiming at the prevention of hypoglycaemia, preventing acute metabolic decompensation, and acute hyperglycaemia symptoms (e.g., excessive thirst and excessive urination) while at all costs preserving a patients' quality of life, comfort and dignity. (2A)<br/>We suggest that for older subjects in palliative care, maintaining blood glucose levels above 6 mmol/l will help to minimize hypoglycaemia. Maintaining blood glucose levels between 6 and 12 mmol/l should help to prevent symptoms of hyperglycaemia. (2A)<br/>We suggest that during palliative care of frail and bedridden subjects, it is important to adopt a robust preventative strategy to minimize the development of diabetic ulcers, feet infections and pressure ulcers. (1A)</td></tr></tbody></table>

* 2A—Lower strength—evidence from well-conducted cohort or case-control studies

* 1A—Expert Opinion (no direct evidence available)—to be used as ‘Good Clinical Practice’

**Glucose-lowering treatment recommendations**

Type 2 diabetes mellitus requires a holistic control of different metabolic disorders, including control of blood pressure, plasma lipids, heart rhythm, and blood glucose. This

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
executive summary focuses specifically on the glucose con-
trol by glucose-lowering treatment.

Some specific management procedures need be consid-
ered for older people compared with adults. First, the poten-
tial risks and benefits of glucose-lowering treatment should
be carefully balanced to determine the appropriate choice
of glycaemic targets. Second, a special attention should
be placed to strictly avoid hypoglycaemia. As a result, the
choice of certain hypoglycaemic agents (such as sulpho-
nylureas, for example) will be prioritised differently than
for younger patients. Then, the choice of treatment will be
individualised according to the patient's characteristics. A
detailed assessment of the patient as a whole (including an
assessment of frailty, or other geriatric characteristics) is,
therefore, absolutely essential.

Of the recent guidelines for the management of type 2
diabetes, only a few make specific recommendations for
older people have been produced and the possible short-
comings of these have been reviewed recently [6]. The new
EuGMS–EDWPOP guideline, whose recommendations are
presented in this Executive Summary, are entirely addressed
to the care and needs of older patients with diabetes. 3A
glucose-lowering treatment.

Pharmacological glucose regulation is based on the use of
glucose-lowering agents which provide cardiovascular (CV)
safety and protection. Older people with diabetes often have
multiple risk factors for hypoglycaemia developing during
treatment and these include chronic renal disease, erratic eat-
ing meal patterns, dementia, polypharmacy, and even frailty
that should be considered. Some glucose-lowering agents
have a high risk of hypoglycaemia (sulfonylureas, glinides
and insulin), while others have a low (and even null) risk
of hypoglycaemia (metformin, DPPIV inhibitors, SGLT2
inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists). In older people with
type 2 diabetes, hypoglycaemia should be avoided.

Metabolic targets

For fit independent patients, a tight HbA1c is acceptable,
while in less fit individuals with multiple comorbidities
and organ dysfunctions, more relaxed targets are more
reasonable to avoid the side effects of medications and the
risk of hypoglycaemia. [7] A target blood pressure (BP)
of < 130/80 mmHg, if tolerated, is reasonable in fit inde-
pendent older people with diabetes as it is associated with a
reduction of cardiovascular risks, while in less fit individu-
als, higher targets are reasonable as low BP may be associ-
ated with adverse events including mortality. [8] Although
most of lipid trials were conducted in younger population,
it appears that the magnitude of risk reduction in older peo-
ple is similar to younger patients. The evidence for statin
therapy is established for older people with diabetes up to
the age of 80 years. However, reduction of intensity of statin

therapy may be required in less fit individuals. In addition,
the effects of high or moderate intensity statin use in care
home residents may not have positive effects on avoiding
hospital admissions or reduction of mortality. [9] Therefore,
in this group of fully dependent population a clinician dis-
cretion is required about reduction of intensity or complete
withdrawal of treatment with aim focused on quality of life
and reducing polypharmacy. (Table 2).

These glucose-lowering agents can be used in older peo-
ple following a suggested strategy (Fig. 2), based on the
potential benefits and harm of each therapeutic classes, and
on the key issues and concerns that should be considered in
the clinical decision.

Regarding non-insulin agents, metformin at the lowest dose possible is a suitable first line therapy due to its low risk of hypoglycaemia and CV benefits. Metformin should be avoided in people with significant cardiovascular disease, chronic renal disease, weight loss and acute illness. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are an alternative to metformin when contra-indicated or not tolerated, or a second-line treatment with metformin in frail or dependent subjects (if HbA1c still > 58 mmol/mol). DPP4i have gastrointestinal side effects, and a dose adjustment is needed in chronic kidney disease. Both sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are suitable choices for second-line treatment with metformin to limit the worsening of cardiovascular disorders or renal failure, particularly in obese patients (GLP-1Ra apart of their glucose-lowering properties. However, their use should be balanced in subjects at risk for side-effects. SGLT2i are not suitable for moderately-severe frailty, or for care home residents with weight loss. They increase the risk of urinary tract infections, candidiasis, dehydration, hypotension, and diabetic ketoacidosis. The effect on glucose regulation is poor if eGFR is lower than 60 ml/min. GLP-1Ra's not suitable for subjects with chronic renal impairment or care home residents with weight loss or renal impairment.

Sulfonylureas (SU) are low-cost drugs and have an effec-
tive glucose-lowering effect. They are possible second-line
option if economic considerations are central to the decision.
However, they have a high risk of hypoglycaemia, a high rate
of interactions with other drugs, and potential cardiovascu-
lar side-effects with an excess of mortality. They should be
avoided in severe renal impairment. Glinides (e.g., Repagli-
nide) is similar to SU in terms of glucose-lowering effect
efficiency, but they have a medium risk of hypoglycaemia.
They have an extended half-life in older people, and in cases
of renal impairment, and there is only a little data for their
use in older people. Both SU and glinides should be used
with the highest caution in older people.
<table><caption>**Table 2** Suggested targets in older people with diabetes based on functional status</caption><thead><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Independent</th><th>Partially dependent</th><th>Dependent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>HbA1c</td><td>7.0–7.5% (53–58.5 mmol/mol)</td><td>7.5–8.0% (58.5–63.9 mmol/mol)</td><td>8.0–8.5% (63.9–69.4 mmol/mol)</td></tr><tr><td>BP</td><td>130/80 mmHg</td><td>140/90 mmHg</td><td>150/90 mmHg</td></tr><tr><td>Dyslipidaemia</td><td>High intensity statin, aim for > 50% reduction in LDL</td><td>High intensity statin, aim for > 50% reduction in LDL</td><td>To continue high intensity, replace to moderate intensity or withdraw based on clinical discretion</td></tr></tbody></table>

Independent = No physical or cognitive impairment with no assistance in activities of daily living (ADL), partially dependent = Mild cognitive/physical impairment needing some assistance with ADL, Dependent = moderate–severe cognitive/physical impairment needing full assistance in ADL

The use of insulin in addition to metformin is a third-step strategy. Different options may be considered. The use of once daily long-acting basal insulin offers easy titration, flexible administration, less weight gain and low risk of hypoglycaemia. However, it is less physiologic with post-prandial glucose excursions. The use of twice daily combination (or premixed insulins) is simple, with fixed doses, and provides a good glycaemic control. However, it is subject to weight gain, hypoglycaemic risk and it is only suitable for patients with regular eating patterns. The use of basal–bolus insulin is the most physiological in its effects on glucose-levels, and provides a good glycaemic control. However, it requires a complex titration, frequent injections, staff training in care homes, and has a high risk of weight gain and hypoglycaemia. Finally, insulin can be combined with GLP-1RAs, offering a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and delaying the use of complex insulin regimens. The restrictions and disadvantages are the same as GLP-1Ra’s alone (see above).

DPP4i: dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; SU: sulfonylureas; SGLT2i: sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; GLP-1Ra: glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists; BMI: Body Mass Index; * Sulfonylureas with low-risk of hypoglycaemia; insulin: basal, basal–bolus or premix.

### 3B De-escalation of glucose-lowering treatment

De-escalation of treatments should be considered for several conditions, as outlined in Box 1, to avoid overtreatment in older adults. This is the case either when the risk of hypoglycaemia is too great, or when the expected benefit of the treatment is not certain.

Hypoglycemic medications were safely withdrawn in a cohort of frail nursing home older adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 84.4 ± 6.8 years, [13] and in another group in the community, mean age, 86.5 ± 3.2 years, who were attending outpatient clinics without deterioration of their glycemic control [14]. Their main features were significant weight loss, increased comorbidities, including dementia, and polypharmacy, with recurrent hypoglycemia. Therefore,

people with these criteria appear to be suitable candidates for a trial of deintensification or withdrawal of hypoglycemic medications.

**Box 1: Summary of patients’ characteristics to deintensify hypoglycaemic medications in older people with Type 2 diabetes [12]**

* Dementia, especially those with erratic eating pattern and abnormal behaviour.

* Elderly, especially those ≥ 80 years old.

* Impaired renal function, especially those with end stage renal disease.

* Numerous comorbidities, especially those with ≥ 5 comorbidities.

* Tight glycaemic control, especially those with HbA1c < 7%.

* End of life phase, especially those with ≤ 1-year life expectancy.

* Nursing home residents, especially those with multiple comorbidities.

* Significant weight loss, especially unintentional indicating frailty.

* Inappropriate medications, especially insulin or sulfonylureas.

* Frequent hypoglycaemia, especially serious episodes needing assistance.

* Years long of diabetes, especially those > 20 years duration.

### Screening for Frailty and Cognitive Impairment

Frailty screening is a crucial part of the assessment of older patients with T2DM. However, implementation in routine primary care can be difficult due to limited time. Besides the
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>DPP4i: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; SU: Sulfonylureas; SGLT2i: Sodium-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; GLP-1Ra: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists; BMI: Body Mass Index; * Sulfonylureas with low-risk of hypoglycaemia; Insulin: basal, basal-bolus or premix.</figcaption></figure>

<caption>**Fig. 2** Proposal for a glucose lowering strategy in primary care in the older patient (based on the EASD guidelines and specific key considerations. [10, 11]</caption>

historical criteria [15] and scales [16, 17], operational tools have been developed adapted to clinical practice. Clinical features pointing to frailty include general symptoms such as exhaustion, examination data such as muscle weakness, weight loss, slow walking speed, and cognitive impairment,

behaviour changes such as low physical activity and finally comorbidity, sensorial impairments and polypharmacy. Some tools need to be confirmed by a more in-depth evaluation, such as the Toulouse gerontopole scale [18]or the electronic frailty index developed in the UK and based on
the cumulative deficit model to identify and score frailty based on routine interactions of patients with their general practitioner [19]. The Share frailty [20] Instrument [21] is proposed for primary care setting and accessible via web calculators (https://sites.google.com/a/tcd.ie/share-frailty-instrument-calculators/translated-calculators).

Cognitive impairment is a highly prevalent condition in older people with T2DM and has a potentially important impact on treatment management (e.g., choice of treatments). The screening of cognitive impairment is, therefore, suggested at regular intervals for patients aged 70 years and over. Different tools are available to screen for cognitive impairments, such as the MoCA, MiniCog, or the Mini Mental State Examination Score [22]. The common reversible causes of cognitive impairment (e.g., delirium, medication side-effects, metabolic or endocrine disturbances, sleep problems, and depressive disorder) should be sought, through a full medical assessment.

Among the other frequent conditions in older people with T2DM, fragility fractures deserve a particular consideration. The usual markers (such as bone mineral density) are difficult to interpret in those people. It is, therefore, important to identify other risk factors, such as previous history of fracture(s) or fall(s), low grip strength, or poor glycaemic control, which should trigger the initiation of a prevention strategy [23].

## Conclusions

The guideline aims to be inclusive, both for patients and the primary care multidisciplinary team. Rather than focusing on numerical targets for glycaemic control, this guide proposes an integrative approach with regular updates of the care plan. Frailty screening offers the opportunity to propose targeted preventative strategies. The development of new treatment for diabetes and new technologies should be tested in term of actions on frailty. The writing group underlines the lack of evidence in several domains and particularly in the oldest patients. However, care is facilitated with digital health instrument and older patients should benefit from this new tool. High quality research is needed in the oldest old.

**Acknowledgements** The important contribution of Philip Ivory (now deceased) is warmly recognised. No other acknowledgements are declared.

**Author contributions** IBM, SM and AJS were the development leads of this guideline and were main the editors. All other authors contributed equally to chapter writing, commenting on drafts, and approving the final submission.

**Funding** No funding received.

## Declarations

**Conflict of interest** None of the authors have declared a Conflict of Interest in this manuscript.

**Ethical approval and consent to participate** Not applicable.

**Statement of human and animal rights** This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

**Informed consent** For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

**Consent to publication** All authors gave their consent to publication—no third-party approval was needed.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

1. Bourdel MI (2009) Models of care, the European perspective. In: Sinclair AJ (ed) Diabetes Old age. Wiley-Blackwell, Chippenham, pp 453–459

2. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Helmer C, Barberger-Gateau P et al (2007) Characteristics of undiagnosed diabetes in community-dwelling French elderly: the 3C study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 76:257–264

3. Makrilakis K, Kalpourtzi N, Ioannidis I et al (2021) Prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in Greece. Results of the First National Survey of Morbidity and Risk Factors (EMENO) study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 172:108646

4. Jönsson B (2002) Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia 45:S5–S12

5. Dunning T, Sinclair A, Colagiuri S (2014) New IDF Guideline for managing type 2 diabetes in older people. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 103:538–540

6. Christiaens A, Henrard S, Zerah L et al (2021) Individualisation of glycaemic management in older people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines recommendations. Age Ageing 50:1935–1942

7. Lipska KJ, Krumholz H, Soones T et al (2016) Polypharmacy in the aging patient: a review of glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 315:1034–1045

8. Odden MC, Peralta CA, Haan MN et al (2012) Rethinking the association of high blood pressure with mortality in elderly adults: the impact of frailty. Arch Intern Med 172:1162–1168

9. Campitelli MA, Maxwell CJ, Maclagan LC et al (2019) One-year survival and admission to hospital for cardiovascular events among older residents of long-term care facilities who were prescribed intensive- and moderate-dose statins. CMAJ 191:E32–E39
10. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A et al (2020) 2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 43:487–493

11. Abdelhafiz AH, Sinclair AJ (2020) Cardio-renal protection in older people with diabetes with frailty and medical comorbidities - A focus on the new hypoglycaemic therapy. J Diabetes Complicat 34:107639

12. Abdelhafiz AH, Sinclair AJ (2018) Deintensification of hypoglycaemic medications-use of a systematic review approach to highlight safety concerns in older people with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 32:444–450

13. Sjoblom P, Anders Tengblad, Lofgren UB, et al. (2008) Can diabetes medication be reduced in elderly patients? An observational study of diabetes drug withdrawal in nursing home patients with tight glycaemic control. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 82(2): 197–202

14. Abdelhafiz AH, Chakravorty P, Gupta S et al (2014) Can hypoglycaemic medications be withdrawn in older people with type 2 diabetes? Int J Clin Pract 68:790–792

15. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol 56:M146–M156

16. Morley JE (2009) Developing novel therapeutic approaches to frailty. Curr Pharm Des 15:3384–3395

17. Pulok MH, Theou O, Valk AM et al (2020) The role of illness acuity on the association between frailty and mortality in emergency department patients referred to internal medicine. Age Ageing 49:1071–1079

18. Hoogendijk EO, van Kan GA, Guyonnet S et al (2015) Components of the frailty phenotype in relation to the frailty index: results from the toulouse frailty platform. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:855–859

19. Vellas B, Balardy L, Gillette-Guyonnet S et al (2013) Looking for frailty in community-dwelling older persons: the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool (GFST). J Nutr Health Aging 17:629–631

20. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J et al (2016) Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing 45:353–360

21. Romero-Ortuno R, Walsh CD, Lawlor BA et al (2010) A frailty instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr 10:57

22. Stewart C, Stewart J, Stubbs S et al (2022) Mini-Cog, IQCODE, MoCA, and MMSE for the Prediction of Dementia in Primary Care. Am Fam Physician 105:590–591

23. Dufour AB, Kiel DP, Williams SA et al (2021) Risk factors for incident fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes: the framingham heart study. Diabetes Care 44:1547–1555

24. Pilotto A, Ferrucci L, Franceschi M et al (2008) Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for one-year mortality from comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenat Res 11:151–161

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Authors and Affiliations

Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson<sup>1,17</sup> · Stefania Maggi<sup>2</sup> · Ahmed Abdelhafiz<sup>3</sup> · Sri Bellary<sup>4</sup> · Jacopo Demurtas<sup>5</sup> ·

Angus Forbes<sup>6</sup> · Philip Ivory<sup>7</sup> · Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas<sup>8</sup> · Cornel Sieber<sup>9,18</sup> · Timo Strandberg<sup>10,19</sup> ·

Daniel Tessier<sup>11,20</sup> · Itziar Vergara<sup>12</sup> · Nicola Veronese<sup>13</sup> · Andrej Zeyfang<sup>14</sup> · Antoine Christiaens<sup>15,21</sup> · Alan Sinclair<sup>16</sup>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Alan Sinclair
Sinclair.5@btinternet.com

1. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, CRMSB, UMR 5536, F-33000 Bordeaux, France

2. National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy

3. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rotherham General Hospital, Rotherham S60 2UD, UK

4. Aston University, Birmingham, UK

5. Primary Care Department, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Grosseto, Italy

6. Division of Care in Long Term Conditions, King's College London, London, UK

7. Patient advocate, London, UK

8. Division of Geriatrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Getafe, Spain

9. Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany

10. University of Helsinki, Clinicum, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

11. Research Centre on Aging, Affiliated with CIUSSS de L'Estrie-CHUS, 1036, Rue Belvédère Sud, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 4C4, Canada

12. Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr. Begiristain S/N, 20014 Donostia, Basque Country, Spain

13. Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

14. Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Palliative Medicine and Diabetology, Medius Klinik Ostfildern-Ruit and Nürtingen, Nürtingen, Germany

15. Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

16. King's College, London WC2R 2LS, UK

17. CHU Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France

18. Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland

19. University of Oulu, Center for Life Course Health Research, Oulu, Finland

20. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, 2500, Boul. de L'Université, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada

21. Fund for Scientific Research, Brussels, Belgium