# Childbearing desire and reproductive behaviors among women living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

Shino Arikawa, Patricia Dumazert, Eugene Messou, Juan Burgos-Soto, Kiswend-Sida Thierry Tiendrebeogo, A. Zahui, A. Horo, Albert Minga, Renaud Becquet

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Shino Arikawa, Patricia Dumazert, Eugene Messou, Juan Burgos-Soto, Kiswend-Sida Thierry Tiendrebeogo, et al.. Childbearing desire and reproductive behaviors among women living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15 (10), pp.e0239859. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239859. hal-03108449

HAL Id: hal-03108449

https://hal.science/hal-03108449

Submitted on 13 Jan 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Childbearing desire and reproductive behaviors among women living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

Shino Arikawa<sup>1,*</sup>, Patricia Dumazert<sup>1,2,*</sup>, Eugène Messou<sup>2,3</sup>, Juan Burgos-Soto<sup>1,2</sup>, Thierry Tiendrebeogo<sup>1</sup>, Angèle Zahui<sup>2</sup>, Apollinaire Horo<sup>4</sup>, Albert Minga<sup>2,5</sup>, Renaud Becquet<sup>1</sup>

1 Inserm, UMR 1219, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team IDLIC, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 2 Programme PAC- CI, ANRS site in Côte d'Ivoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Treichville, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 3 Centre de Prise en charge de Recherche et de Formation (CePReF-Aconda-VS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 4 Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Yopougon, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 5 Centre Médical de Suivi de Donneurs de Sang (CMSDS), Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

© These authors contributed equally to this work.

* shino.arikawa@u-bordeaux.fr

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Arikawa S, Dumazert P, Messou E, Burgos-Soto J, Tiendrebeogo T, Zahui A, et al. (2020) Childbearing desire and reproductive behaviors among women living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0239859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859

**Editor:** Kannan Navaneetham, University of Botswana, BOTSWANA

**Received:** April 1, 2020

**Accepted:** September 14, 2020

**Published:** October 21, 2020

**Copyright:** © 2020 Arikawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from [http://mereva.isped.u-bordeaux2.fr/]. The full dataset cannot be made open access due to the presence of participant identifiable content. However, a redacted version can be made accessible to interested parties with a formal request and after signing of a Data Transfer Agreement. Please note that data request can be sent to Renaud Becquet <renaud.becquet@ubordeaux.fr> or Ms. Sophie Karcher <sophie.

## Abstract

## Introduction

Evidence on childbearing desire and reproductive behaviors in women living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is scarce, particularly in West Africa. We investigated the prevalence and associated factors of childbearing desire in HIV-infected women in care in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire and explored whether such desires were translated into behaviors related to contraceptive use and communication with health personnel.

## Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two HIV-care facilities in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire in 2015. Eligible women were non-pregnant, non-menopausal, aged 18–49 years and diagnosed as HIV-infected. The outcomes were childbearing desire, prevalence of modern contraceptive use, unmet needs for family planning and intention of the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis. Women wishing to conceive immediately were asked whether they had discussed their desire with HIV healthcare workers. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the outcomes and women's characteristics.

## Results

Of 1,631 women, 80% declared having childbearing desire. No association was found between women's childbearing desire and ART status or its duration. In multivariate models, younger age, being in a stable relationship and having no or only one child were significantly associated with increased childbearing desire. Of the women wishing to conceive immediately (n = 713), only 43% reported having had fertility-related dialogue with healthcare provider. Among sexually active women wanting to avoid or delay pregnancy (n = 650), unmet
karcher@u-bordeaux.fr> Renaud Becquet is the coordinator of MEREVA (Methodology and Evaluation for clinical Research and Epidemiology on HIV in Africa) which handles data and monitoring issues in our institute.

**Funding:** The study was conducted under the International epidemiology Database to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) West Africa collaboration grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD); National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Grant number: 5U01AI069919 (Primary investigator: François Dabis). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support was provided by the French charity SIDACTION (Aide aux équipes 15-2-AEQ-06-01) and the West and Central Africa Region office of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Kiswend-Sida Thierry Tiendrebeogo was a PhD fellow from the French National Agency on AIDS research, ANRS (grant ANRS 12360 B92).

**Competing interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

needs for family planning was 40%. Regarding the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis, one in three women reported not having wanted a baby at that time.

## Conclusions

Pregnancy desire in women living with HIV in Abidjan was extremely high. Integration of safe conception strategies as well as improvement of contraceptive uptake among women in need of family planning are of utmost importance to ensure optimal conception and to avoid transmission of HIV to the male partner or to the forthcoming child.

## Introduction

Improved access to prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services and antiretroviral therapy (ART) have dramatically changed reproductive choice in women living with HIV. In the pre-ART era, HIV-infected women were often considered as not fit to become mother due to ill health, compromised childcare capacity and survival, and most importantly because of the risk associated with the vertical transmission of HIV [1]. Despite such stigmatizing views, studies have shown that HIV-infected women had childbearing desires and pursued reproductive goals to have their own biological child [1-3]. Societal expectation on woman's role as mother and cultural values related to large family, especially in the context of sub-Saharan Africa, motivated women to conform to the norm despite potential risks [3].

With the protection of ART, HIV transmission risks, both vertically and horizontally, are extremely low [4-6]. One might think that HIV-infected women on ART would feel more assured thus encouraged to conceive and by consequence have increased desire for motherhood [7]. While studies from Europe and North America generally confirm such hypothesis [8], evidence from sub-Saharan Africa is very limited and, if any, largely comes from Eastern and Southern Africa [2, 9-12]. The results of these studies are not conclusive however, showing increased desire in women on ART in some settings [2, 9, 10], but not elsewhere [11, 12].

HIV care, regardless where it is located, should be able to respond adequately to different client's needs, whether for optimal conception or for limiting or avoiding pregnancies. In recent years, several approaches for safe conception have been proposed, including reduction of women's infectiousness through ART, use of pre-exposure prophylaxis by non-infected partner, sperm washing, artificial insemination, unprotected sex during fertile period and voluntary male circumcision [13]; however, access to and availability of such services are limited in many resource-limited settings [14, 15]. It might not be surprising therefore that prevalence of unplanned pregnancies and unmet needs for family planning in HIV-infected women are still alarmingly high, raising concerns for persisting risk of vertical and horizontal HIV transmission and of adverse effects on women's own health [16-18].

Côte d'Ivoire is one of the countries most affected by HIV in West Africa, with a prevalence of 2.7% [19]. Women account for more than a half of adults (≥15 years) living with HIV in the country [19]. While the country intensifies its effort to improve PMTCT and ART coverage with extended eligibility [20], integration of reproductive health services in HIV care has not reached to sufficient level, let alone implementation of client-oriented service delivery related to safe conception and prevention of unplanned pregnancy.

The present study aims to assess the prevalence and determinants of childbearing desire in HIV-infected women in care in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. We also explored if their desires were
translated into behaviors related to contraceptive use and communication with health person-
nel. Finally, we assessed if pregnancies that had occurred after HIV diagnosis were planned
and estimated the frequency of unintended pregnancies in this population.

Methods

Study design and setting

We conducted in 2015 a cross-sectional survey in two HIV-care facilities in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, located in the most densely populated areas of the city, Treichville and Yopougon. These secondary-level facilities offer to patients routine clinical visits every three months with free of charge provision of ART. ART eligibility at the time of the study was CD4 count below 350 cells/mm³. Reproductive health services were not routinely offered in any of these facilities, and patients were referred to counselors for family planning issues, either upon explicit request from patients themselves or clinical call made by health workers. Provision of male condoms was free and unrestricted on patients' demand. Other contraceptive commodities including implant, intrauterine device (IUD), oral contraception pills and related-services were not available in these facilities, and patients were referred to services dedicated for family planning. No particular safe conception strategy was put in place at the time of the survey. In the communities surrounding these facilities, male condoms are easily accessible in pharmacies and other small shops.

Study population

Eligible women were non-pregnant, pre-menopausal, aged between 18–49 years, and diag-
nosed as HIV positive. Women were approached individually while waiting for their routine
HIV medical appointment and informed of the purpose of the study. Only those agreeing to
participate underwent informed consent process and completed the survey administered by
trained midwives in a private space.

Data collection

Information on socio-demographic characteristics of the women and their reproductive his-
tory were gathered. Women who declared being in a stable relationship were asked to provide
information on their partner. Childbearing desire was defined by women’s response to the
question “Would you like to have a child in the future?” (yes, no, I don’t know). When women
answered affirmatively, they were asked to choose a desired timing of conception, either
immediately, in 1–2 years, or sometime in the future. The questionnaire was pre-tested and
modified as necessary.

The intention of the last pregnancy since the diagnosis of HIV status was assessed using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMPU) [21]. The LMPU is a psychometrically-validated measure of the degree of intention of a current or recent pregnancy, constituted by six questions rated 0, 1 or 2, providing a final score ranging from 0 to 12. We asked women a series of pre-defined questions related to their feelings about the pregnancy and how they prepared for it. At the time of the survey, there was no validated French version of the LMPU, thus the study team undertook the translation work. The translated version was tested with local midwives in order to fully ensure comprehension of the study questions.

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of the women were described as median and frequency for continuous and cat-
egorical variables, respectively. Women's childbearing desire was classified into two distinct
categories, grouping together those having no or ambiguous desire, which was compared to
those reporting positive childbearing desire. Logistic regression models were used to estimate
the association between women's childbearing desire and the following factors: ART (yes/no),
age (18-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44), education (no formal education, primary, secondary,
tertiary or above), remunerated activity, presence of a male partner, HIV status disclosure to
partner, and the number of living children (0, 1, ≥2). Additionally, women's ART status was
modelled in several different manners to see if the duration of ART (30, 180 or 365 days since
ART initiation) was associated with childbearing desires. To investigate if couple-related char-
acteristics influence women's childbearing desire, we also undertook sub-analysis among
women in a relationship. Missing data were included as a separate category to maintain sample
size. Explanatory variables were selected on the basis of prior knowledge on associated factors.
We used stepwise-descending approach to identify association. In the final model, statistical
significance was reached when P-value <0.05.

Behaviors of women were also explored according to their respective pregnancy desire.
Among those sexually active and wishing to delay or avoid pregnancy, we assessed the prevalence of modern contraceptive use to see if their behaviors correspond with their desire to limit pregnancies. Among women wishing to conceive immediately, we estimated the proportion of those who had discussed such childbearing intentions with health personnel.

The intention of the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis was assessed based on the LMPU
score and the criteria recommended by Barrett et al. [21]. A score between 0-3, 4-9 or 10-12
meant that the pregnancy was unplanned, ambivalent or planned, respectively. The distribu-
tion of pregnancy intention was described as frequency. This analysis was undertaken exclu-
sively among women who had at least one pregnancy after their HIV diagnosis and who
reported both the date of HIV diagnosis and of their last pregnancy in order to ensure tempo-
rality of the events.

Ethics statement

This study was granted ethical permission in Côte d'Ivoire from the ethical committee of the
National AIDS Control Programme, under the International epidemiology Database to Evalu-
ate AIDS (IeDEA) West Africa collaboration. All study participants were informed of the
objective of the study and provided written consent.

Results

Description of the study population

Of the 2,016 women approached by the study investigators, 1,632 met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. One woman was excluded from the analyses for not having information on ART (Fig 1).

The socio-demographic and reproductive health related characteristics of the 1,631 women included in the analyses are shown in Table 1. Median age was 37.0 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 32.4-41.5), almost a half achieved secondary or higher education, and 66% had a paid work. They been living with HIV for a median of 5.1 years (IQR: 2.2-8.3), and nearly 90% were on ART for a median duration of 52.9 months (IQR: 22.9-82.1). One quarter had no living child, 29% had one and 44% had two or more. Women had a median of three lifetime pregnancies (IQR: 2-5). Overall, 75% (n = 1,230) were in a relationship. Of these, 21% had a partner known to be HIV positive (n = 253), and 32% had a partner having been tested negative for HIV (n = 392). The remaining 47% (n = 585) did not know the HIV status of their partner.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig 1. Flow chart on the selection of study population.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859.g001

Overall prevalence of modern contraceptives was 51% (n = 827). The majority were using short-term contraceptives including oral hormonal pills (49%, n = 407) and male condoms (41%, n = 342). Utilization of long-acting reversible contraception was extremely low: 8% for injectable (66/827), 1% for intrauterine device (IUD) (9/827), and 0.4% for implant (3/827). Of those who declared using male condoms or oral hormonal pills, 21% and 17% expressed dissatisfaction about the method, respectively. The rate was lower among women using injectable (10%), IUD (0%) or implant (0%).

## Childbearing desire and associated factors

Of 1,631 women included in the analyses, 80% expressed childbearing desire (n = 1,310), and 16% reported not wanting to have a child in the future (n = 255). The remaining (4%, n = 66) were not sure of their desire. Among 1,310 women who expressed explicit desire for childbearing, 54% (n = 713) wished to conceive immediately, 16% (n = 208) in one or two year and 30% (n = 389) sometime in the future.

In univariate analyses, women's ART status was not associated with childbearing desire (P = 0.50). Similarly, there was no association between duration of ART and childbearing desire regardless of the thresholds used (30, 180 or 365 days since ART initiation). No association was found between women's childbearing desire and work status or income level. Younger women were significantly more likely to report childbearing desire compared to those over 40 years of age (OR: 6.8, 5.8, 5.8, and 2.5 for 18–24, 25–29, 30–34, and 35–39 years age
<table><caption>Table 1. Description of the study population (N = 1,631).</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>N</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Age</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18-24</td><td>54</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>25-29</td><td>164</td><td>10.1</td></tr><tr><td>30-34</td><td>379</td><td>23.2</td></tr><tr><td>35-39</td><td>483</td><td>29.6</td></tr><tr><td>Over 40</td><td>551</td><td>33.8</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Education</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No formal education</td><td>360</td><td>22.1</td></tr><tr><td>Primary</td><td>496</td><td>30.4</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary</td><td>550</td><td>33.7</td></tr><tr><td>Tertiary or above</td><td>225</td><td>13.8</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Having paid work</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>553</td><td>33.9</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>1,078</td><td>66.1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>On ART</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>201</td><td>12.3</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>1,430</td><td>87.7</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Number of living children</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0</td><td>437</td><td>26.8</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>478</td><td>29.3</td></tr><tr><td>≥ 2</td><td>715</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>1</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td><strong>In a relationship</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>401</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>1,230</td><td>75.4</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Contraceptive use (modern methods including male condoms)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>804</td><td>49.3</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>827</td><td>50.7</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Contraceptive use (modern methods not including male condoms)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>1,146</td><td>70.3</td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>485</td><td>29.7</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Type of contraceptives used (n = 827)</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Oral hormonal pills</td><td>407</td><td>49.2</td></tr><tr><td>Male condoms</td><td>342</td><td>41.4</td></tr><tr><td>Injectable</td><td>66</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>Intra-uterine device</td><td>9</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Implant</td><td>3</td><td>0.3</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859.t001

categories, respectively). Number of living children was inversely associated with increased childbearing desire. Women having tertiary or higher education were significantly more likely to report having childbearing desire in univariate analysis, however this association became statistically non-significant when adjusting for study site, age, and number of living children. Adjusted for study site and women's socio-economic characteristics (education, age, work, relationship status), there was no association between women's ART status and childbearing desire. Younger age, being in a relationship (married or other types of relationship), having no or only one child, and having a paid work were significantly associated with increased child-bearing desire in multivariate model (Table 2).
<table><caption>Table 2. Associated factors with childbearing desire among women living with HIV (N = 1,631).</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3"></th><th colspan="2">Having childbearing desire</th><th colspan="2">Having no childbearing desire</th><th colspan="4">Univariable</th><th colspan="3">Multivariable</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">(N = 1,310)</th><th colspan="2">(N = 321)</th><th rowspan="2">OR</th><th rowspan="2">95%CI</th><th rowspan="2">P</th><th rowspan="2">aOR</th><th rowspan="2">95%CI</th><th rowspan="2">P</th></tr><tr><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Study site</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Treichville</td><td>599</td><td>74.6</td><td>204</td><td>25.4</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yopougon</td><td>711</td><td>85.9</td><td>117</td><td>14.1</td><td>2.07</td><td>1.61</td><td>2.66</td><td>2.61</td><td>1.95</td><td>3.50</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Age category (in years)</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td></tr><tr><td>18-24</td><td>51</td><td>94.4</td><td>3</td><td>5.6</td><td>8.59</td><td>2.65</td><td>27.90</td><td>3.95</td><td>1.15</td><td>13.53</td></tr><tr><td>25-29</td><td>151</td><td>92.1</td><td>13</td><td>7.9</td><td>5.87</td><td>3.24</td><td>10.63</td><td>3.89</td><td>2.05</td><td>7.38</td></tr><tr><td>30-34</td><td>348</td><td>91.8</td><td>31</td><td>8.2</td><td>5.67</td><td>3.77</td><td>8.53</td><td>4.51</td><td>2.90</td><td>7.02</td></tr><tr><td>35-39</td><td>394</td><td>81.6</td><td>89</td><td>18.4</td><td>2.24</td><td>1.67</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.02</td><td>1.46</td><td>2.81</td></tr><tr><td>40-49</td><td>366</td><td>66.4</td><td>185</td><td>33.6</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Education</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.05</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.29</td></tr><tr><td>No formal education</td><td>281</td><td>78.1</td><td>79</td><td>21.9</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Primary</td><td>397</td><td>80.0</td><td>99</td><td>20.0</td><td>1.13</td><td>0.80</td><td>1.57</td><td>1.19</td><td>0.81</td><td>1.75</td></tr><tr><td>Secondary</td><td>436</td><td>79.3</td><td>114</td><td>20.7</td><td>1.08</td><td>0.78</td><td>1.49</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.58</td><td>1.24</td></tr><tr><td>Tertiary or above</td><td>196</td><td>87.1</td><td>29</td><td>12.9</td><td>1.90</td><td>1.20</td><td>3.02</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.53</td><td>1.58</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Having a paid work</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.14</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.02</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>433</td><td>78.3</td><td>120</td><td>21.7</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>877</td><td>81.3</td><td>201</td><td>18.7</td><td>1.21</td><td>0.94</td><td>1.56</td><td>1.41</td><td>1.05</td><td>1.90</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Monthly income</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.22</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>less than 90 USD</td><td>932</td><td>80.3</td><td>228</td><td>19.7</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>90-180 USD</td><td>195</td><td>83.7</td><td>38</td><td>16.3</td><td>1.26</td><td>0.86</td><td>1.83</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>above 180 USD</td><td>159</td><td>77.9</td><td>45</td><td>22.1</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.60</td><td>1.24</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>24</td><td>70.6</td><td>10</td><td>29.4</td><td>0.59</td><td>0.28</td><td>1.25</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>On ART</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.50</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.70</td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>165</td><td>82.1</td><td>36</td><td>17.9</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>1145</td><td>80.1</td><td>285</td><td>19.9</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.60</td><td>1.29</td><td>1.10</td><td>0.70</td><td>1.73</td></tr><tr><td><strong>No. of living children</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td></tr><tr><td>0</td><td>413</td><td>94.5</td><td>24</td><td>5.5</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>433</td><td>90.6</td><td>45</td><td>9.4</td><td>0.56</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.93</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.90</td></tr><tr><td>≥ 2</td><td>463</td><td>64.8</td><td>252</td><td>35.2</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>1</td><td>100.0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>*</td><td></td><td></td><td>*</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Relationship status</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt;.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Single</td><td>279</td><td>70.3</td><td>118</td><td>29.7</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Married</td><td>288</td><td>74.2</td><td>100</td><td>25.8</td><td>1.22</td><td>0.89</td><td>1.66</td><td>1.78</td><td>1.23</td><td>2.57</td></tr><tr><td>Other types of relationship</td><td>739</td><td>12.2</td><td>103</td><td>87.8</td><td>3.03</td><td>2.25</td><td>4.09</td><td>2.79</td><td>1.97</td><td>3.95</td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>4</td><td>100.0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>*</td><td></td><td></td><td>*</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

To investigate the impact of couple-related characteristics on women's childbearing desire, we undertook a sub-analysis on the women who have a partner (n = 1,230). As Table 3 shows, unmarried women, whether living with partner or not, were significantly more likely than married women to report childbearing desire in univariate analysis (P < .0001). Women whose partner was known to be HIV-infected were significantly less likely to report their

<footnote>*Not estimated due to small number of patients under this category.</footnote>
desire to have a child compared to women whose partner was not known to be HIV positive (OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34-0.62). Likewise, women who declared having disclosed their HIV status to their partner were significantly less likely to report having childbearing desire. However, once women's age, number of living children and study sites were allowed in multivariate analyses, HIV status of partner and disclosure variable were no longer associated. Lack of association with these variables were also confirmed by several sensitivity analyses using different age categories (binary 18-29 vs. over 30 years; three categories 18-24, 25-34 and over 35 years). In multivariate analyses, unmarried women who were not living with the partner were significantly more likely to report childbearing desire than married women.

## Dialogue with health personnel and unmet family planning needs

Of the 713 women who reported having a desire to conceive immediately, only 43% declared having discussed their fertility desire with health personnel (297/713). Dialogue with health personnel was also infrequent among 650 women who were sexually active and wanted to delay or to avoid pregnancy: only 12% (55/650) declared having consulted health personnel on family planning options. Unmet family planning needs were high among these women: 40% (258/650) reported not using any types of modern contraceptive methods.

## Intention of the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis

A total of 481 women were included in the assessment of intention on the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis. As Fig 2 shows, the overall LMUP scores were distributed fairly unevenly with high concentration on the score 10 (47.5%), and the remaining on the score 3 (11.3%), 2 (10.4%), 4 (8.5%), 12 (5.8%), and 9 (5.6%).

Based on the LMUP definition, 54% of the last pregnancies were considered as planned (score 10-12), 24% as ambivalent (score 4-9), and 22% as unplanned (score 0-3). Women's responses to specific items of the questionnaire are provided in Table 4.

The great majority (93%) reported not having been using any contraceptives during the month they became pregnant. Overall, 61% said that their pregnancy happened at the right time and 64% actually intended to get pregnant. One in three women reported not having wanted a baby at that time. Most women (90%) did not take any particular actions as

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>Fig 2. Distribution of overall score based on the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (N = 480).</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859.g002
<table><caption>Table 3. Associated factors with childbearing desire in women living with HIV who have a partner (N = 1,230).</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3"></th><th colspan="2">Having childbearing desire</th><th colspan="2">Having no childbearing desire</th><th colspan="4">Univariable</th><th colspan="3">Multivariable*</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">(N = 1,027)</th><th colspan="2">(N = 203)</th><th rowspan="2">OR</th><th rowspan="2">95%CI</th><th rowspan="2">P</th><th rowspan="2">aOR</th><th rowspan="2">95%CI</th><th rowspan="2">P</th></tr><tr><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Type of relationship</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt; .0001</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.047</td></tr><tr><td>Married, living together</td><td>288</td><td>74.2</td><td>100</td><td>25.8</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Not married, living together</td><td>415</td><td>87.2</td><td>61</td><td>12.8</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.66 3.36</td><td></td><td>1.43 0.96 2.12</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Not married, not living together</td><td>324</td><td>88.5</td><td>42</td><td>11.5</td><td>2.68</td><td>1.80 3.97</td><td></td><td>1.66 1.07 2.58</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Partner's HIV status</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>&lt; .0001</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Positive</td><td>186</td><td>73.5</td><td>67</td><td>26.5</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Negative</td><td>328</td><td>83.7</td><td>64</td><td>16.3</td><td>1.85</td><td>1.25 2.72</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>513</td><td>87.7</td><td>72</td><td>12.3</td><td>2.57</td><td>1.77 3.73</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Woman's HIV status disclosed to partner</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.001</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>392</td><td>88.1</td><td>53</td><td>11.9</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>629</td><td>80.7</td><td>150</td><td>19.3</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.40 0.80</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Unknown</td><td>6</td><td>100.0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>**</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859.t003

preparation for conception while a small number of women sought medical advice (6%) or took other initiatives (3%) including purchase of traditional medicine.

## Discussion

Our study showed that more than 80% of HIV-infected women desired children, a rate particularly high compared to what was reported from other HIV populations in sub-Saharan Africa: 29% in Uganda [11], 30% in Kenya [22], 26% to 31% in South Africa [2, 12]. This high prevalence of childbearing desire in our study clearly highlights the extent to which women valued childbearing in Abidjan. The reported rate is fairly striking given high median age in our study population (37 years) and that they already had three lifetime pregnancies. This high median age and the fact that the women in a relationship (but not married) had the highest childbearing desire could suggest that these women were married once and are actually in a new relationship where they feel the need to prove their fertility. Unfortunately, we could not verify this hypothesis as we did not have any information on women's marital status in the past. Desire for children among HIV-infected women was associated with younger age, being in a relationship, and fewer number of living children. Childbearing desire was not different according to ART status or the duration of ART. Similarly, there was no association with HIV status of the partner or whether or not women's HIV status had been disclosed to the male partner. Fertility rate in Côte d'Ivoire is one of the highest in the world with a total fertility rate of five children per woman (3.1 in Abidjan), and more than 70% of women in reproductive age in Côte d'Ivoire wished to have a (or another) child in the future [23]. Motherhood and large family are highly valued and interpreted as wealth and security for the family. In such societal context, HIV and ART-related factors might not provide full explanation on the motivation behind fertility decision in women or couples affected by HIV. While our data does not allow to comment on whether or not this high level of childbearing desire is observed in HIV-uninfected counterparts, it clearly highlights the needs for better integration of reproductive

<footnote>*Adjusted for woman's age category, number of living children and study site.</footnote>

<footnote>**Not to be estimated due to small number.</footnote>
<table><caption>Table 4. Intention of the last pregnancy since HIV diagnosis using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>N</th><th>%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>In the month that I became pregnant...</strong></td></tr><tr><td>I was not using contraception in all</td><td>444</td><td>92.5</td></tr><tr><td>I was using contraception, but not every time we had sex</td><td>31</td><td>6.5</td></tr><tr><td>I always used contraception, but knew that the method had failed at least once</td><td>5</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>In terms of becoming a mother, I feel that my last pregnancy happened at the...</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Right time</td><td>291</td><td>60.6</td></tr><tr><td>Ok, but not quite right time</td><td>90</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>Wrong time</td><td>99</td><td>20.6</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Just before I became pregnant this time...</strong></td></tr><tr><td>I intended to get pregnant</td><td>309</td><td>64.4</td></tr><tr><td>My intentions kept changing</td><td>3</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>I did not intend to get pregnant</td><td>168</td><td>35.0</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Just before I became pregnant this time...</strong></td></tr><tr><td>I wanted to have a baby</td><td>314</td><td>65.4</td></tr><tr><td>I had mixed feelings about having a baby</td><td>12</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>I did not want to have a baby</td><td>154</td><td>32.1</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Before I became pregnant...</strong></td></tr><tr><td>My partner and I had agreed that we would like me to be pregnant</td><td>300</td><td>62.5</td></tr><tr><td>My partner and I discussed having children together, but hadn't agreed for me to get pregnant</td><td>79</td><td>16.5</td></tr><tr><td>We never discussed having children together</td><td>101</td><td>21.0</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>Before you became pregnant, did you do anything in preparation for pregnancy?</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Yes, I took one or more following actions (multiple response allowed):</td><td>47</td><td>9.8</td></tr><tr><td>Took folic acid</td><td>5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Stopped or cut down smoking</td><td>0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Stopped or cut down drinking alcohol</td><td>2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ate more healthily</td><td>0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Got medical advice</td><td>28</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Did something else to prepare</td><td>14</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No, I did not do any of the above before my pregnancy</td><td>433</td><td>90.2</td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><strong>LMUP Score</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Unplanned pregnancy (score 0-3)</td><td>107</td><td>22.3</td></tr><tr><td>Ambivalent pregnancy (score 4-9)</td><td>115</td><td>24.0</td></tr><tr><td>Planned pregnancy (score 10-12)</td><td>258</td><td>53.7</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239859.t004

health services into HIV care and the importance of making these services more client-oriented. In this context, lack of clear strategies on safe conception in the current HIV care should be seen as a gap between client's needs and existing services. We also showed that the vast majority of women in need of counselling for immediate conception did not seek any advice from health personnel. Health-care providers should initiate dialogue on pregnancy intentions in order to ensure that sufficient precautions are taken to avoid vertical and horizontal transmission of HIV and to fully achieve reproductive rights of women living with HIV.

Furthermore, high unmet family planning needs and the reluctance to seek advice on contraception were also clearly shown by our study. Although a half of women declared using modern contraceptives, many used short-term solutions such as male condoms. Due to low effectiveness of barrier methods in preventing unwanted pregnancy [24], healthcare providers should be reminded that such method should be kept as one of many options and promoted solely as a component of method mix. Available evidence does not suggest that women living
with HIV using ART should have restrictions on the choice of hormonal contraceptives, and
most contraceptive methods are rated as Medical Eligibility Criteria 2 (A condition where the
advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks: GRADE
moderate to very low quality of evidence) by the World Health Organization, except for IUD
for women with advanced HIV stage due to potential risk of pelvic inflammatory disease fol-
lowing IUD placement [25–27]. Women wishing to avoid or delay pregnancy should therefore
receive information and counselling on the whole range of contraceptive methods and be
encouraged to make informative decision. Despite regular contacts with health personnel,
HIV-infected women have rarely sought advice from health personnel on family planning.
Their reluctance might be related to partner's desire for having more children, his unwilling-
ness for the woman to use contraceptive, lack of decision making or negotiating power on
women's part, or perceptions related to contraception and family planning in general. The
most recent Demographic Health Survey in Côte d'Ivoire reported a low prevalence of modern
contraceptive methods in Abidjan in the general population (21%), which suggests cultural or
societal factors influencing low acceptability [23]. Quality of messages from health personnel
might not be fully adapted to untangle certain belief or doubts on contraceptives. An in-depth
socio-anthropologic approach would be needed to identify underlying causes of persisting low
contraceptive use in HIV-infected women who wish to avoid or delay pregnancies.

Our study also shed light on pregnancy intention in HIV-infected women after HIV diag-
nosis. While about a half of most recent pregnancies were considered as intended, caution is
needed in interpreting this result due to limitations in the method used. In the LMUP, non-
utilization of contraceptives was weighted towards having a pregnancy intention, however
such a simple interpretation can be misleading in a place like Côte d'Ivoire where motherhood
and childbearing are highly appreciated, and misconceptions on contraceptives are still widely
held. In our study, the majority of women considered as having had pregnancy intention
(86%, 223/258) scored 10 in the LMUP, the lowest score for being qualified as having a
planned pregnancy. Of these, 99% (221/223) were not using any contraceptives. These preg-
nancies would not have been defined as ambivalent if we were to assign less weight on the utili-
zation of contraceptives as an indicator for pregnancy intention. This means that the number
of pregnancies that could be defined as planned is indeed very few.

Our study has several limitations. Pregnancy desire and intention are notions extremely
complex to capture and might not be adapted for binary classification. The cross-cutting
nature of the study also hinders full understanding of the notions which are far from static and
subject to temporal changes in personal and couple dynamics. Moreover, retrospective investi-
gation on the previous pregnancy might have caused recall biases, and social desirability
related childbearing could have played a part in certain responses of the women.

Conclusions

Pregnancy desire in women living with HIV in Abidjan was extremely high. There is an urgent
need to cater for different reproductive needs and desires of these women. Integration of safe
conception strategies within the existing HIV care services, as well as improvement of con-
traceptive uptake among women in need for family planning are of utmost importance not
only to avoid unplanned pregnancies but also to ensure an optimal timing for conception. The
results of our study are useful for identifying policy priorities and interventions in order to ful-
fil reproductive health and rights of women living with HIV. As HIV is increasingly recog-
nized as a chronic disease [3, 28], and with an increasing number of women initiating and
continuing on ART, HIV care services should adequately respond to different childbearing
desires of women living with HIV over their reproductive life span.
**Acknowledgments**

We are indebted to the women who accepted to participate in this study. We thank Pierre Rob-
ert, advisor on HIV & AIDS at the West and Central Africa Region UNFPA office for his sup-
port in the implementation of this study. We also wish to thank the members of the scientific
committee of the French charity SIDACTION for having supported this initiative. This study
was part of the West-Africa, Early Treatment & Integration of HIV and Reproductive health
(WETIV-R) program, ancillary to the IeDEA West Africa project. The composition of the
WETIV-R program is as follows. Principal investigators: Renaud BECQUET (INSERM
U1219, Bordeaux, France), Albert MINGA (CNTS, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire). Associated investi-
gators: Eugène MESSOU (CePReF, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire), Apollinaire HORO (CHU de
Yopougon, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire). Project coordination: Shino ARIKAWA (INSERM U1219,
Bordeaux, France), Thierry TIENDREBEOGO (INSERM U1219, Bordeaux, France), Angèle
ZAHUI (Programme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire). Patients follow-up and data monitor-
ing (Programme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire): Marina ASSIE, Alphonsine KOH, Marie-
Josée AKOUA, Ida ZADI, Jean-Claude AZANI, Juste YAO.

**Author Contributions**

**Conceptualization:** Patricia Dumazert, Juan Burgos-Soto, Renaud Becquet.

**Data curation:** Patricia Dumazert, Juan Burgos-Soto, Angèle Zahui, Albert Minga.

**Formal analysis:** Shino Arikawa, Patricia Dumazert, Juan Burgos-Soto.

**Funding acquisition:** Renaud Becquet.

**Methodology:** Shino Arikawa.

**Supervision:** Patricia Dumazert, Eugène Messou, Juan Burgos-Soto, Angèle Zahui, Albert Minga, Renaud Becquet.

**Validation:** Eugène Messou, Juan Burgos-Soto, Angèle Zahui, Apollinaire Horo, Albert Minga, Renaud Becquet.

**Visualization:** Shino Arikawa.

**Writing – original draft:** Shino Arikawa, Patricia Dumazert, Juan Burgos-Soto, Renaud Becquet.

**Writing – review & editing:** Shino Arikawa, Patricia Dumazert, Thierry Tiendrebeogo, Albert Minga, Renaud Becquet.

**References**

1. Kirshenbaum SB, Hirky AE, Correale J, Goldstein RB, Johnson MO, Rotheram-Borus MJ, et al. "Throwing the dice": pregnancy decision-making among HIV-positive women in four U.S. cities. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2004; 36(3):106–13. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.36.106.04 PMID: 15306272

2. Myer L, Morroni C, Rebe K. Prevalence and determinants of fertility intentions of HIV-infected women and men receiving antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007; 21(4):278–85. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2006.0108 PMID: 17461723

3. Nattabi B, Li J, Thompson SC, Orach CG, Earnest J. A systematic review of factors influencing fertility desires and intentions among people living with HIV/AIDS: Implications for policy and service delivery. AIDS and Behavior. 2009; 13(5):949–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9537-y PMID: 19330443

4. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Kiarie J, Thomas KK, Stevens W, Cohen CR, et al. Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission after initiation of antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010; 375 (9731):2092–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60705-2 PMID: 20537376
5. Cooper ER, Charurat M, Mofenson L, Hanson IC, Pitt J, Diaz C, et al. Combination antiretroviral strategies for the treatment of pregnant HIV-1-infected women and prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002; 29(5):484-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126334-200204150-00009 PMID: 11981365

6. Castilla J, Del Romero J, Hernando V, Marincovich B, Garcia S, Rodriguez C. Effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy in reducing heterosexual transmission of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005; 40(1):96-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000157389.78374.45 PMID: 16123689

7. Clea CS, Lisa R, Yvonne M. Reproductive Health and Family Planning Needs Among HIV-Infected Women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current HIV Research. 2013; 11(2):160-8. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570162x11311020008 PMID: 23432491

8. Panozzo L, Battegay M, Friedl A, Vernazza PL. High risk behaviour and fertility desires among heterosexual HIV-positive patients with a serodiscordant partner—two challenging issues. Swiss medical weekly. 2003; 133(7-8):124-7. https://doi.org/2003/07/smw-10124 PMID: 12644959

9. Maier M, Andia I, Emenyonu N, Guzman D, Kaida A, Pepper L, et al. Antiretroviral therapy is associated with increased fertility desire, but not pregnancy or live birth, among HIV+ women in an early HIV treatment program in rural Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2009; 13 Suppl 1:28-37.

10. Antelman G, Medley A, Mbatia R, Pals S, Arthur G, Haberlen S, et al. Pregnancy desire and dual method contraceptive use among people living with HIV attending clinical care in Kenya, Namibia and Tanzania. The journal of family planning and reproductive health care. 2015; 41(1):e1. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100784 PMID: 25512359

11. Kakaire O, Osinde MO, Kaye DK. Factors that predict fertility desires for people living with HIV infection at a support and treatment centre in Kabale, Uganda. Reproductive Health. 2010; 7:27-. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-27 PMID: 20937095

12. Kaida A, Laher F, Strathdee SA, Janssen PA, Money D, Hogg RS, et al. Childbearing Intentions of HIV-Positive Women of Reproductive Age in Soweto, South Africa: The Influence of Expanding Access to HAART in an HIV Hyperendemic Setting. American Journal of Public Health. 2011; 101(2):350-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.177469 PMID: 20403884

13. Matthews LT, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Cooke I, Davies N, Heffron R, Kaida A, et al. Consensus statement: Supporting Safer Conception and Pregnancy For Men And Women Living with and Affected by HIV. AIDS Behav. 2018; 22(6):1713-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1777-7 PMID: 28501964

14. Loutfy MR, Sonnenberg-Schwan U, Margolese S, Sherr L. A review of reproductive health research, guidelines and related gaps for women living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2013; 25(6):657-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.733332 PMID: 23088551

15. Joseph Davey D, West S, Umutoni V, Taleghani S, Klausner H, Farley E, et al. A Systematic Review of the Current Status of Safer Conception Strategies for HIV Affected Heterosexual Couples in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Behav. 2018.

16. Homsy J, Moore D, Barasa A, Were W, Likicho C, Waiswa B, et al. Breastfeeding, mother-to-child HIV transmission, and mortality among infants born to HIV-infected women on highly active antiretroviral therapy in rural uganda. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2010; 53(1):28-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181bdf65a PMID: 19797972

17. Schwartz SR, Bassett J, Sanne I, Phofa R, Yende N, Van Rie A. Implementation of a safer conception service for HIV-affected couples in South Africa. AIDS. 2014; 28 Suppl 3:S277-85.

18. Rochat TJ, Arteche AX, Stein A, Mkwanazi N, Bland RM. Maternal HIV disclosure to young HIV-uninfected children: An evaluation of a family-centred intervention in South Africa. AIDS. 2014; 28(SUPPL 3):S331-S41.

19. UNAIDS. Country factsheets: Côte d'Ivoire 2016 [12 June 2018]. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/ctedivoire.

20. UNAIDS. 2014 Progress reports submitted by countries 2014 [12 June 2018]. Available from: http://files.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/knowyourresponse/countryprogressreports/2014countries/CIV_narrative_report_2014.pdf.

21. Barrett G, Smith SC, Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004; 58(5):426. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.014787 PMID: 15082745

22. Mayhew SH, Colombini M, Kimani JK, Tomlin K, Warren CE, Mutemwa R. Fertility intentions and contraceptive practices among clinic-users living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):626. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4514-2 PMID: 28679389

23. Enquête Démographique et de Santé et à Indicateurs Multiples de Côte d'Ivoire 2011–2012. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Institut National de la Statistique (INS) et ICF International, 2012.
24. Patel RC, Bukusi EA, Baeten JM. Current and future contraceptive options for women living with HIV. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2018; 19(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2017.1378345 PMID: 28891343

25. WHO. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. August 2015.

26. Nanda K, Stuart GS, Robinson J, Gray AL, Tepper NK, Gaffield ME. Drug interactions between hormonal contraceptives and antiretrovirals. AIDS (London, England). 2017; 31(7):917–52.

27. Scarsi KK, Darin KM, Chappell CA, Nitz SM, Lamorde M. Drug-Drug Interactions, Effectiveness, and Safety of Hormonal Contraceptives in Women Living with HIV. Drug Saf. 2016; 39(11):1053–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0452-7 PMID: 27562873

28. Deeks SG, Lewin SR, Havlir DV. The end of AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. Lancet. 2013; 382(9903):1525–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61809-7 PMID: 24152939