# Differentiating healthy orthorexia from orthorexia nervosa: sociodemographic, psychological and dietary characteristics in a French sample

Eva Hanras, Emilie Boujut, Juan Ramón Barrada, Géraldine Dorard

► To cite this version:

Eva Hanras, Emilie Boujut, Juan Ramón Barrada, Géraldine Dorard. Differentiating healthy or-
thorexia from orthorexia nervosa: sociodemographic, psychological and dietary characteristics in a
French sample. Public Health Nutrition, 2024, 27, pp.e255. 10.1017/S1368980024002374 hal-
04848037

HAL Id: hal-04848037

https://hal.science/hal-04848037v1

Submitted on 19 Dec 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
Research Paper

**Cite this article:** Hanras E, Boujut E, Barrada JR, and Dorard G (2024). Differentiating healthy orthorexia from orthorexia nervosa: sociodemographic, psychological and dietary characteristics in a French sample. *Public Health Nutrition* **27**: e255, 1–11. doi: **10.1017/S1368980024002374**

Received: 22 February 2024

Revised: 24 October 2024

Accepted: 11 November 2024

**Keywords:**

Orthorexia; Orthorexia nervosa; Healthy orthorexia; Eating disorders; Healthy eating

**Corresponding author:** Juan Ramón Barrada;
Email: barrada@unizar.es

Differentiating healthy orthorexia from
orthorexia nervosa: sociodemographic,
psychological and dietary characteristics
in a French sample

Eva Hanras¹, Emilie Boujut¹,², Juan Ramón Barrada³ ID and Géraldine Dorard¹

¹Université Paris Cité, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Boulogne-Billancourt F-92100, France; ²Cergy Paris Université, INSPE, Saint-Germain en Laye 78100, France and ³Departamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Abstract

**Objective:** Orthorexia has been widely studied, but recently, a new conceptualisation was proposed to distinguish its healthy characteristics from its pathological ones. The objective of this study was to differentiate healthy orthorexia (HeOr) from orthorexia nervosa (OrNe) by exploring their sociodemographic, psychological, health and dietary characteristics using comparative and correlational statistical methods. **Design:** Cross-sectional analysis. Participants completed an online, self-administered questionnaire assessing their sociodemographic characteristics, orthorexia, exercise dependence, personality, health anxiety, food choice motives, emotional competences and eating disorders (ED). **Setting:** Data were collected between May 2021 and September 2022. **Participants:** 1515 French females (mean age = 37.67). Responses from men were excluded. **Results:** While OrNe was mainly associated with weight control motives in food choices (r = 0.42), HeOr was more strongly correlated with natural content (r = 0.60) and health motives (r = 0.49). In relation to exercising, OrNe showed its highest association with weight control (r = 0.41). Health anxiety was more strongly associated with OrNe than with HeOr. Both OrNe and HeOr were related to diet adherence and regular exercise, but the association was stronger for the latter. Orthorexia scores, mainly OrNe, were higher in participants at the risk of ED. Participants who were afraid to gain weight showed higher OrNe scores. **Conclusions:** HeOr seems to be part of a healthy lifestyle in general. In contrast, OrNe falls into the category of an ED and is associated with more problematic psychological functioning. Particular attention should be given to individuals who are beginning to control and reduce their food intake to prevent them from developing OrNe.

Orthorexia has been studied chiefly from its pathological side: orthorexia nervosa (OrNe), an intense preoccupation with a healthy diet with negative emotional, cognitive and/or social consequences. Research focuses both on how those with high OrNe trait levels pursue their goals and how they respond when their eating behaviour deviates from them(1). A panel of experts recently proposed new diagnostic criteria for OrNe(2). Furthermore, considering that orthorexia can also reflect healthy behaviour(3), a bidimensional conceptualisation of orthorexia has emerged(4).

Healthy orthorexia (HeOr) is distinguished from OrNe. It includes a healthy interest in diet, healthy behaviour with regard to diet and eating healthily as part of one's identity. Importantly, although HeOr and healthy eating are positively associated(5,6), they are not equivalent. A person can be highly engaged with following his/her standards of healthy eating, which may or may not be, in fact, healthy, as official guidance provided by government-appointed public health experts and lay beliefs about healthy eating tend to differ(7). Furthermore, a person can follow a healthy diet with or without considering it relevant to his/her identity. Thus, this bidimensional model implies that orthorexic trait levels should not be placed within a single continuum ranging from no relevance of healthy diet in one's life to a pathological approach to healthy eating via intermediate points with adaptive and not interfering levels of relationship with healthy eating. To describe a person's orthorexic trait levels, we need two scores: one for OrNe and another for HeOr. These two dimensions tend to show low-medium correlations(8,9).

It has been noted that the scales traditionally used to measure OrNe (the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale, DOS(10), and the Eating Habits Questionnaire, EHQ(11)) can be divided into two factors: OrNe and HeOr(12). This bidimensional conceptualisation is promising, especially as the initial properties of these scales are not stable(7), but it raises questions about the interpretation of previous studies using either the DOS or EHQ. In light of this, ‘OrNe’ will hereafter be used to refer to orthorexia nervosa and ‘ON’ to the way some studies and scales have operationalised this construct while partially evaluating HeOr.

© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

The
Nutrition
Society

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

CAMBRIDGE
UNIVERSITY PRESS
According to the consensus document on OrNe diagnosis(2), OrNe should be considered an eating disorder (ED). ED are supposed to be exclusive (two diagnoses cannot be made at the same time), but OrNe can be prodromal, co-morbid or resolutive of another ED (in particular, anorexia nervosa, AN(13-15)). OrNe is understood to differ from AN in its relationship with the body(2): while the search for potential weight loss in OrNe is understood to be associated with health concerns, AN is usually associated with body dissatisfaction and/or dysmorphia. Nevertheless, Depa et al.(8) showed that OrNe scores are positively predicted by 'weight control' motives for food choice, while HeOr scores are positively predicted by 'health content'. Contrary to the suggestion of Donini et al.(2), no significant associations between 'health' motivations and OrNe scores were found. Therefore, further research is needed to better understand food choice motives in orthorexia.

Moreover, while several risk factors for OrNe have been suggested(2), many issues remain unresolved regarding their relationships with both dimensions of orthorexia. First, a systematic review and meta-analysis showed that exercise addiction is moderately associated with OrNe(16). Kiss-Leizer et al.(17) suggested that physical exercise may be an attempt to control weight. However, no studies have tested this hypothesis. Thus, it is not yet possible to determine whether OrNe and HeOr differ in terms of their associations with physical exercise or dependence on it.

Second, ON/OrNe is positively associated with health anxiety/
hypochondria(9,17,18). OrNe could be a coping strategy(17).
Conversely, no association between HeOr and health anxiety
was found(9). It is important to continue exploring the different
components of health anxiety in relation to orthorexia and to
determine whether it is possible to refine the distinction between
HeOr and OrNe.

Third, it has been shown that ON/OrNe is associated with
difficulty identifying emotions<sup>(19-21)</sup>. The results concerning other
emotional regulation dimensions are diverse: while two studies
showed that ON was positively associated with difficulties in
emotional regulation<sup>(19,21)</sup>, Strahler et al.<sup>(20)</sup> found that OrNe was
positively associated with difficulty in controlling impulses.
Therefore, further studies are required to clarify these discrepan-
cies, especially as the results on the dimensions of personality are
also heterogeneous.

Regarding the Big Five personality traits, ON/OrNe is positively associated with Neuroticism/Negative Affectivity(11,22,23), although conversely, Awad et al.(24) showed that OrNe was negatively predicted by Negative Affectivity. The results are more contradictory for other personality traits. For example, HeOr was positively correlated with Extraversion in a German sample but negatively in a Lebanese sample(23). Culture seems to influence the expression of personality traits, and in turn, this influences eating/orthorexic behaviour(23). Further studies are needed to clarify the personality traits associated with orthorexia.

Although the bidimensional conceptualisation of orthorexia(4)
is gradually gaining recognition, more studies are needed to better
understand it. To date, the findings concerning OrNe/ON obtained
are very diverse, not only regarding its association with
sociodemographic(2), health and weight status data but also with
psychological and dietary dimensions. This diversity can be
explained by the different methods used to measure ON/OrNe.
The unidimensional conceptualisation assesses non-pathological
features of orthorexia, which ultimately correspond to HeOr in the
bidimensional conceptualisation. To better understand orthorexia,
it is essential to distinguish striving for a healthy diet from a

psychopathological preoccupation in order to avoid pathologising
what should not be pathologised. In this way, study results will
likely be less heterogeneous in the future. Indeed, this study aimed
to better characterise orthorexia in terms of its bidimensional
conceptualisation.

To do this, we selected broad variables (in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, health, weight status and psychological processes) and key aspects of eating behaviour or ED. We used a double statistical approach: first, by comparing the scores of HeOr and OrNe according to the modalities of the sociodemographic, health, weight status and dietary variables, and second, by evaluating the correlations between HeOr and OrNe scores with age and clinical scales. Due to the exploratory nature of some of the study variables, no hypothesis was made regarding the links between orthorexia scores and participants' socio-demographic characteristics. We assumed, however, that OrNe scores would be associated with more problematic functioning modalities (e.g. ED Neuroticism and health anxiety) than HeOr scores.

Method

Participants and procedure

Participants were recruited between May 2021 and September 2022. The call for participation was disseminated through social media and the investigators' networks. The link to the study - hosted on the LimeSurvey platform - was included in the advertisements to recruit participants. The investigators had no contact with the participants, and participation was voluntary, without compensation.

The inclusion criteria for each participant were checked after
they had read the study information leaflet and given their consent.
To participate, individuals had to be between 18 and 65 years old,
fluent in French, and, for women, not pregnant. The research
protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the
University that hosted the study (N°2020-97).

A total of 1742 participants were recruited. Male respondents were excluded due to their small number (n 174), and some women were excluded due to missing or outlying sociodemographic data (n 33 for missing data: they selected the ‘do not wish to answer’ or ‘other’ response without adding any further details as requested; n 6 mentioned their age as a single digit), anthropometric measures (n 15 mentioned aberrant heights and/or weights) or dietary answers (n 5 for which a diet was not attributable). The final sample was comprised of 1515 French-speaking women. Within this final sample, the median participation time was 29 min (first quartile: 23 min; third quartile: 38 min).

Measures

Sociodemographic, health, weight status and dietary data

We collected sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. gender (male/
female), age, marital status (single/in a relationship)), health-
related data (e.g. chronic diseases (yes/no)), weight status
(i.e. height and current weight), physical exercise (yes/no/in the
past) and dietary-related data (e.g. diet (check list with definition
from *omnivore* to *vegan*), frequency of organic food consumption
(from *only organic food to never*)).

Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS)

The French Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS)(25) measures the
bidimensional conceptualisation of OrNe (α = 0.82; all Cronbach's
as reported correspond to the current sample) and HeOr (α = 0.85). The scale consists of seventeen items rated on a four-point scale from 0 = **strongly disagree** to 3 = **strongly agree**.

## Food Choice Questionnaire

The French Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ)⁽²⁶⁾ assesses nine food choice motives: convenience (α = 0.80), natural content (α = 0.83), ethical concern (α = 0.85), weight control (α = 0.79), sensory appeal (α = 0.67), price (α = 0.82), familiarity (α = 0.73), health (α = 0.82) and mood (α = 0.83). The scale consists of thirty-nine items rated on a four-point scale from 1 = **not at all** important to 4 = **very important**.

## Exercise Dependence Questionnaire

The French Exercise Dependence Questionnaire (EDQ)⁽²⁷⁾ assesses eight dimensions of exercise dependence: positive reward (α = 0.78), stereotypical behaviour (α = 0.64), withdrawal symptoms (α = 0.85), interference with social/family/work life (α = 0.56), insight into problems (α = 0.70), exercise for weight control (α = 0.65), exercise for social reasons (α = 0.43) and exercise for health reasons (α = 0.76). The questionnaire was presented only to participants who reported exercising regularly. The scale consisted of twenty-nine items rated on a seven-point scale from 1 = **strongly disagree** to 7 = **strongly agree**. Unfortunately, we omitted Item 14 when designing the survey.

## Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses

The French Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnoses (Q-EDD)⁽²⁸⁾ assesses the presence of disordered eating behaviours based on fifty items using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria. Item scoring was adapted to match the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ED. The Q-EDD allows for a diagnosis of AN, bulimia nervosa (BN) or binge eating disorder (BED) to be made. Some data can also be processed categorically (e.g. afraid to gain weight (yes/no)).

## Health Anxiety Questionnaire

The French Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ)⁽²⁹⁾ measures four dimensions of health anxiety: health worry and preoccupation (α = 0.89), fear of illness and death (α = 0.89), reassurance-seeking behaviour (α = 0.76) and interference with life (α = 0.82). The scale consists of twenty-one items rated on five-point scale from 1 = **never** to 5 = **most of the time**.

## Profile of Emotional Competence

The Profile of Emotional Competence (PEC)⁽³⁰⁾ measures intra- and interpersonal emotional competencies. Only the items that assess intrapersonal skills were used to assess participants' ability to identify (α = 0.72), understand (α = 0.81), express (α = 0.69), regulate (α = 0.77) and use (α = 0.70) their emotions. This part consists of twenty-five items rated on a five-point scale from 1 = **strongly disagree** to 5 = **strongly agree**.

## Big Five Inventory

The French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr)⁽³¹⁾ assesses five personality traits: Extraversion (α = 0.87), Agreeableness (α = 0.73), Conscientiousness (α = 0.81), Neuroticism (α = 0.86) and Openness (α = 0.77). The scale consists of forty-five items rated on a five-point scale from 1 = **strongly disagree** to 5 = **strongly approve**.

## Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with R 4.3.2. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess whether there was a difference in means between orthorexia scores (OrNe and HeOr) according to the assessed sociodemographic, health, weight status and dietary variables. One-way ANOVA were used to analyse categorical data. When the independent variable had two levels (e.g. marital status and mother), Cohen's *d* was used to measure the effect size (interpreted according to Cohen⁽³²⁾). When the independent variable had more than two levels (e.g. academic degree and ED), we used *R* (the square root of the percentage of explained variance) as the effect size measure for the overall model and Cohen's *d* for Tukey's pair-wise comparisons. Also, Pearson's correlations were performed between HeOr, OrNe and other quantitative variables (i.e. age, subscales). We analysed all of the subscales even though internal consistencies were relatively low for some.

## Results

Descriptive analysis, mean comparisons and Pearson's correlations are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The possible range of scores for OrNe was 0–24. Sample mean was 5.46. These results indicate that most participants presented very low scores on this dimension. For HeOr, the acceptable range was 0–27, with the mean being 13.25, almost at the mid-point. The mean orthorexia scores in the present study were comparable to previous results within the same cultural context (the study presenting the French validation of the TOS⁽¹⁾), despite differences in the sample composition – inclusion of men in⁽¹⁾ – and slight differences in the wording of the applied TOS and sample recruitment.

## Mean comparisons for orthorexia nervosa and healthy orthorexia

### Sociodemographic data

OrNe scores were associated with professional status (F(4, 1510) = 2.47, P = 0.043, R = 0.08), with students presenting higher OrNe scores than employees (P = 0.037, d = 0.19). HeOr scores were higher when participants were in a relationship (F(1, 1513) = 9.87, P = 0.002, d = -0.17) and mothers (F(1, 1513) = 10.57, P = 0.001, d = -0.17). HeOr was related with educational attainment (F(2, 1512) = 9.20, P < 0.001, R = 0.11) and professional status (F(4, 1510) = 6.14, P < 0.001, R = 0.13). More specifically, holders of a degree higher than a bachelor's compared with those with a lower degree (P = 0.001, d = 0.19) or equal to the bachelor's (P = 0.012, d = 0.33) showed larger means. Employed and retired participants had higher HeOr scores than students (P < 0.001 for both *post hoc* tests, d = 0.29 and d = 0.59, respectively).

### Health and diet data

OrNe and HeOr scores were higher when participants presented a food allergy (OrNe: F(1, 1513) = 6.26, P = 0.012, d = 0.26; HeOr: F(1, 1513) = 9.19, P = 0.002, d = 0.32) or a food intolerance (OrNe: F(1, 1513) = 4.25, P = 0.039, d = 0.14; HeOr: F(1, 1513) = 14.50, P < 0.001, d = 0.27). While OrNe scores were associated with presenting a chronic illness (F(1, 1513) = 5.99, P = 0.014, d = 0.16) and with healthcare consultation frequency (F(3, 1511) = 9.22, P < 0.001, R = 0.13), none of these associations were statistically significant for HeOr (Ps ≥ 0.123). Mean OrNe scores were higher among participants who consulted a healthcare professional several times a month compared with those who consulted at least once a year (P < 0.001, d = -0.71) or less than once a year
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Descriptive analysis and comparison of sociodemographic, health and dietary data for HeOr and OrNe (n 1515)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">n</th><th rowspan="2">Mean</th><th rowspan="2">SD</th><th colspan="4">Orthorexia nervosa</th><th colspan="4">Healthy orthorexia</th></tr><tr><th colspan="3">ANOVA</th><th rowspan="2">Post hoc (Tukey's)</th><th rowspan="2">Mean</th><th rowspan="2">SD</th><th colspan="3">ANOVA</th><th rowspan="2">Post hoc (Tukey's)</th></tr><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>F</th><th>P</th><th>d/R</th><th></th><th>F</th><th>P</th><th>d/R</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sociodemographic</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Marital status</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.92</td><td>0.337</td><td>0.05</td><td></td><td></td><td>9.87</td><td>0.002</td><td>-0.17</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Single</td><td>492</td><td>5.63</td><td>5.08</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.57</td><td>6.00</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>In a relationship</td><td>1023</td><td>5.38</td><td>4.45</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.57</td><td>5.77</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mother</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.32</td><td>0.252</td><td>0.06</td><td></td><td></td><td>10.57</td><td>0.001</td><td>-0.17</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>748</td><td>5.60</td><td>5.09</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.74</td><td>5.79</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>767</td><td>5.32</td><td>4.18</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.77</td><td>5.90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Educational attainment</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2.16</td><td>0.116</td><td>0.05</td><td></td><td></td><td>9.20</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.11</td><td>C &gt; A,B</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. &lt; Bachelor</td><td>136</td><td>5.20</td><td>4.32</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.72</td><td>5.94</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Bachelor</td><td>269</td><td>5.99</td><td>5.26</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.49</td><td>6.40</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. &gt; Bachelor</td><td>1110</td><td>5.37</td><td>4.54</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.62</td><td>5.67</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Professional status</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2.47</td><td>0.043</td><td>0.08</td><td>A &gt; B</td><td></td><td>6.14</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.13</td><td>B, E &gt; A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Student</td><td>276</td><td>6.15</td><td>5.59</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.87</td><td>5.99</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Employed</td><td>973</td><td>5.25</td><td>4.44</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.53</td><td>5.67</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. Sick leave</td><td>66</td><td>6.14</td><td>4.44</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.14</td><td>6.13</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. Unemployed</td><td>147</td><td>5.43</td><td>4.64</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.28</td><td>4.46</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E. Retired</td><td>53</td><td>5.06</td><td>3.10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.32</td><td>5.43</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Health and diet</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Healthcare consultation frequency</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>9.22</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.13</td><td>A, B &gt; C; A &gt; D</td><td></td><td>1.86</td><td>0.135</td><td>0.06</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Several times a month</td><td>33</td><td>8.48</td><td>7.27</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>14.33</td><td>7.14</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. At least once a month</td><td>185</td><td>6.54</td><td>4.77</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.45</td><td>5.78</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. At least once a year</td><td>1086</td><td>5.20</td><td>4.47</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.05</td><td>5.72</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. Less than once a year</td><td>211</td><td>5.41</td><td>4.79</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.94</td><td>6.40</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic illness</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>5.99</td><td>0.014</td><td>0.16</td><td></td><td></td><td>2.38</td><td>0.123</td><td>0.10</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>306</td><td>6.05</td><td>5.00</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.71</td><td>5.90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>1209</td><td>5.32</td><td>4.56</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.13</td><td>5.85</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Food allergy</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>6.26</td><td>0.012</td><td>0.26</td><td></td><td></td><td>9.19</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.32</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>98</td><td>6.60</td><td>4.66</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>14.98</td><td>6.47</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>1417</td><td>5.69</td><td>4.65</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.13</td><td>5.80</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 1. (Continued)**</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Food intolerance</td><td></td><td></td><td>4.25</td><td>0.039</td><td>0.14</td><td></td><td></td><td>14.50</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.27</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>246</td><td>6.02</td><td>4.77</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>14.54</td><td>5.74</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>1269</td><td>5.36</td><td>4.64</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.00</td><td>5.86</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Diet</td><td></td><td></td><td>7.28</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.15</td><td>B,C,F &gt; A</td><td></td><td>33.41</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.32</td><td>B,C,D,E,F &gt; A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Omnivore</td><td>918</td><td>4.91</td><td>4.27</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.77</td><td>5.65</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Partial vegetarian</td><td>320</td><td>6.21</td><td>4.92</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.45</td><td>5.33</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. Strict vegetarian</td><td>101</td><td>6.45</td><td>5.53</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.43</td><td>5.67</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. Vegan</td><td>91</td><td>6.04</td><td>5.07</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.47</td><td>5.46</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E. Weight loss diet</td><td>44</td><td>6.68</td><td>5.54</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.05</td><td>5.97</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>F. Other restriction</td><td>41</td><td>7.17</td><td>4.97</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>16.95</td><td>5.31</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Organic food consumption</td><td></td><td></td><td>3.05</td><td>0.028</td><td>0.08</td><td>B &gt; D</td><td></td><td>117.99</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.44</td><td>A &gt; B &gt; C &gt; D</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Only organic food</td><td>495</td><td>5.41</td><td>4.58</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>16.24</td><td>5.00</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. At least once a week</td><td>492</td><td>5.94</td><td>4.77</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.52</td><td>5.48</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. Less than once a week</td><td>231</td><td>5.20</td><td>4.88</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.24</td><td>5.20</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. (Almost) Never</td><td>297</td><td>4.98</td><td>4.38</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>9.37</td><td>5.48</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fast-food consumption</td><td></td><td></td><td>7.23</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.10</td><td>C &gt; A</td><td></td><td>64.01</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.28</td><td>C &gt; B &gt; A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. At least once a week</td><td>178</td><td>4.37</td><td>4.03</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>9.49</td><td>5.59</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Less than once a week</td><td>328</td><td>5.21</td><td>4.42</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.08</td><td>5.23</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. (Almost) Never</td><td>1009</td><td>5.74</td><td>4.81</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>14.29</td><td>5.77</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restaurant food consumption</td><td></td><td></td><td>3.90</td><td>0.020</td><td>0.07</td><td>C &gt; B</td><td></td><td>0.19</td><td>0.825</td><td>0.02</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. At least once a week</td><td>155</td><td>4.95</td><td>4.37</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.05</td><td>5.80</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Less than once a week</td><td>372</td><td>5.03</td><td>4.41</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.16</td><td>5.62</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. (Almost) Never</td><td>988</td><td>5.71</td><td>4.78</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.31</td><td>5.97</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weight, ED and exercise</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weight status</td><td></td><td></td><td>9.30</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.13</td><td>A &gt; B,C,D</td><td></td><td>16.18</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.18</td><td>A &gt; B &gt; C,D</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Underweight</td><td>131</td><td>7.30</td><td>6.45</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>15.20</td><td>6.57</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Normal weight</td><td>831</td><td>5.12</td><td>4.60</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>13.71</td><td>5.80</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. Overweight</td><td>313</td><td>5.29</td><td>4.09</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.62</td><td>5.52</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. Obesity</td><td>240</td><td>5.90</td><td>4.14</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.40</td><td>5.57</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ED</td><td></td><td></td><td>103.66</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.41</td><td>A,B &gt; C &gt; D</td><td></td><td>17.64</td><td>&lt; 0.001</td><td>0.18</td><td>A &gt; B,C,D; D &gt; C</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Anorexia nervosa</td><td>34</td><td>12.76</td><td>6.85</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>18.41</td><td>6.64</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. Bulimia nervosa</td><td>54</td><td>11.63</td><td>5.64</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.67</td><td>6.70</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

(Continued)
<table><caption>**Table 1.** (Continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="3"></th><th rowspan="3">n</th><th colspan="4">Orthorexia nervosa</th><th colspan="4">Healthy orthorexia</th></tr><tr><th colspan="2">ANOVA</th><th rowspan="2">d/R</th><th rowspan="2">Post hoc (Tukey's)</th><th colspan="2">ANOVA</th><th rowspan="2">d/R</th><th rowspan="2">Post hoc (Tukey's)</th></tr><tr><th>F</th><th>P</th><th>F</th><th>P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C. Binge eating disorder</td><td>294</td><td>7.08</td><td>4.72</td><td></td><td></td><td>11.66</td><td>5.39</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>D. No</td><td>1133</td><td>4.53</td><td>3.94</td><td></td><td></td><td>13.53</td><td>5.79</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Afraid to gain weight</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><strong>141.59</strong></td><td><strong>&lt; 0.001</strong></td><td><strong>-0.68</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Yes</td><td>1090</td><td>6.32</td><td>4.82</td><td></td><td></td><td>13.13</td><td>5.85</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No</td><td>425</td><td>3.28</td><td>3.35</td><td></td><td></td><td>13.55</td><td>5.89</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Regular physical exercise</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><strong>4.26</strong></td><td><strong>0.014</strong></td><td><strong>0.07</strong></td><td>B &gt; C</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A. Yes</td><td>908</td><td>5.52</td><td>4.79</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>14.23</td><td>5.67</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>B. In the past</td><td>206</td><td>6.13</td><td>4.66</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>12.88</td><td>5.97</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C. No</td><td>401</td><td>4.99</td><td>4.32</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.20</td><td>5.69</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

HeOr, healthy orthorexia; OrNe, orthorexia nervosa; d; Cohen's d; EDQ, eating disorder. Bold values correspond to statistically significant effects, *P* < 0.05.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Descriptive analysis and Pearson's correlations with HeOr and OrNe</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="2">Descriptives</th><th colspan="2">Correlations</th></tr><tr><th>M</th><th>SD</th><th>OrNe</th><th>HeOr</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TOS</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>OrNe</td><td>5.46</td><td>4.66</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>HeOr</td><td>13.25</td><td>5.86</td><td><u>0.40</u></td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>37.67</td><td>12.87</td><td>-0.07</td><td>0.16</td></tr><tr><td>FCQ</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Convenience</td><td>3.05</td><td>0.70</td><td><u>0.02</u></td><td>-0.21</td></tr><tr><td>Natural content</td><td>3.09</td><td>0.81</td><td>0.16</td><td><strong>0.60</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Ethical concerns</td><td>2.73</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.11</td><td><u>0.34</u></td></tr><tr><td>Weight control</td><td>2.52</td><td>0.87</td><td><u>0.42</u></td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Sensory appeal</td><td>3.28</td><td>0.61</td><td>-0.06</td><td>-0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>2.85</td><td>0.77</td><td><u>0.04</u></td><td>-0.23</td></tr><tr><td>Familiarity</td><td>2.13</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.09</td><td>-0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Health</td><td>2.84</td><td>0.69</td><td>0.24</td><td><u>0.49</u></td></tr><tr><td>Mood</td><td>2.48</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.24</td><td><u>0.02</u></td></tr><tr><td>EDQ</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Positive reward</td><td>20.39</td><td>5.31</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Stereotyped behavior</td><td>7.55</td><td>3.50</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Withdrawal symptoms</td><td>14.54</td><td>6.45</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.25</td></tr><tr><td>Interference with social/family/work life</td><td>10.89</td><td>4.77</td><td><u>0.34</u></td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Insight into problem</td><td>5.47</td><td>2.90</td><td><u>0.36</u></td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Exercise for weight control</td><td>9.53</td><td>4.37</td><td><u>0.41</u></td><td>0.18</td></tr><tr><td>Exercise for social reasons</td><td>6.80</td><td>3.20</td><td>0.12</td><td><u>0.03</u></td></tr><tr><td>Exercise for health reasons</td><td>16.97</td><td>3.56</td><td><u>0.03</u></td><td>0.24</td></tr><tr><td>HAQ</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Health worry and preoccupation</td><td>15.59</td><td>6.41</td><td>0.19</td><td>-0.03</td></tr><tr><td>Fear of illness and death</td><td>16.26</td><td>5.18</td><td>0.26</td><td><u>0.05</u></td></tr><tr><td>Reassurance-seeking behavior</td><td>9.84</td><td>3.73</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td>Interference with life</td><td>6.55</td><td>2.71</td><td>0.18</td><td>-0.01</td></tr><tr><td>PEC</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Identification</td><td>3.52</td><td>0.83</td><td>-0.17</td><td>0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Comprehension</td><td>3.24</td><td>0.99</td><td>-0.27</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>Expression</td><td>3.24</td><td>0.88</td><td>-0.16</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Regulation</td><td>2.81</td><td>0.90</td><td>-0.19</td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Utilisation</td><td>3.55</td><td>0.77</td><td>-0.02</td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td>BFI</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Extraversion</td><td>3.25</td><td>0.94</td><td>-0.08</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td>Agreeableness</td><td>4.03</td><td>0.56</td><td>-0.09</td><td>0.08</td></tr><tr><td>Conscientiousness</td><td>3.76</td><td>0.70</td><td>-0.03</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>Neuroticism</td><td>3.27</td><td>0.94</td><td>0.28</td><td>-0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Openness</td><td>3.65</td><td>0.67</td><td><u>0.00</u></td><td>0.23</td></tr></tbody></table>

M, mean; HeOr, healthy orthorexia; OrNe, orthorexia nervosa; TOS, Teruel Orthorexia Scale; FCQ, Food Choice Questionnaire; EDQ, Exercise Dependence Questionnaire; HAQ, Health Anxiety Questionnaire; PEC, Profile of Emotional Competence; BFI, Big Five Inventory. All correlations were statistically significant, *P* < 0.05, except for italicized values. Underlined correlations correspond to |r| > 0.30. Bold correlations correspond to |r| > 0.50.
$(P = 0.002, d = -0.67)$. Moreover, those who consulted at least once a month had higher OrNe scores than those who consulted less than once a year ($P = 0.002, d = -0.29$).

Both orthorexia dimensions were associated with diet, although the effect size for HeOr ($F(5, 1508) = 33.51, P < 0.001, R = 0.32$) was almost double that of OrNe ($F(5, 1508) = 7.28, P < 0.001, R = 0.15$). Compared with omnivores, OrNe and HeOr scores were higher when participants were partial vegetarians ($P < 0.001$ for both *post hoc* comparisons, $d = -0.28$ and $-0.66$, respectively), strict vegetarians ($P = 0.019, d = -0.33; P < 0.001, d = -0.66$) or under other dietary restrictions (e.g. macrobiotic diet, lactose-free diet; $P = 0.026, d = 0.49; P < 0.001, d = 0.93$). HeOr scores were also higher when participants were vegans ($P < 0.001, d = -0.66$) or had followed a weight loss diet ($P = 0.002, d = 0.59$).

OrNe and HeOr scores were associated with organic food consumption, although the relationship was much stronger with HeOr (OrNe: $F(3, 1511) = 3.05, P = 0.028, R = 0.08$; HeOr: $F(3, 1511) = 117.99, P < 0.001, R = 0.44$). Participants who ate organic food at least once a week had higher orthorexia scores than those who almost never did (OrNe: $P = 0.026, d = -0.21$; HeOr: $P = 0.001, d = -0.79$). HeOr scores were higher as organic food consumption increased ($P < 0.001$ for all *post hoc* comparisons, range of *ds* [-1.30, -0.52]). Second, OrNe scores were associated with restaurant food consumption ($F(2, 1512) = 3.90, P = 0.020, R = 0.07$). Participants who almost never ate prepared meals in restaurants had higher OrNe scores than those who ate meals at least once a week ($P = 0.045, d = -0.15$). Third, OrNe and HeOr were related to fast-food consumption, again with a larger effect size for HeOr (OrNe: $F(2, 1512) = 7.23, P < 0.001, R = 0.10$; HeOr: $F(2, 1512) = 64.01, P < 0.001, R = 0.28$). Participants who almost never ate at a fast-food restaurant had higher orthorexia scores than those who ate at such a restaurant at least once a week ($P < 0.001$ for both *post hoc* comparisons, $d = -0.30$ for OrNe and $-0.85$ for HeOr). HeOr scores were also higher as fast-food consumption decreased ($P < 0.001$ for all *post hoc* comparisons, range of *ds* [-0.40, -0.46]).

## Weight, eating disorder and physical exercise

OrNe and HeOr scores were associated with weight status (OrNe: $F(3, 1511) = 9.30, P < 0.001, R = 0.13$, HeOr: $F(3, 1511) = 16.18, P < 0.001, R = 0.18$). Underweight participants had higher orthorexia scores than those reporting normal weight (OrNe: $P < 0.001, d = 0.47$; HeOr: $P = 0.032, d = 0.26$), being overweight (OrNe: $P < 0.001, d = 0.43$; HeOr: $P < 0.001, d = 0.45$) or living with obesity (OrNe: $P = 0.028, d = 0.30$; HeOr: $P < 0.001, d = 0.66$). For HeOr, *post hoc* tests also showed that scores were higher among normal-weight than overweight participants ($P = 0.023, d = 0.19$) or those living with obesity ($P < 0.001, d = 0.40$).

Both orthorexia dimensions were related to ED, with an effect size for OrNe scores ($F(3, 1511) = 103.66, P < 0.001, R = 0.41$) that was more than double that of HeOr scores ($F(3, 1511) = 17.64, P < 0.001, R = 0.18$). More specifically, participants who were identified as having AN had higher orthorexia scores compared with those with BED ($P < 0.001$ for both *post hoc* tests, $d = 1.34$ for OrNe and $1.17$ for HeOr), without ED ($P < 0.001$ for both *post hoc* tests, $d = 1.94$ for OrNe and $0.85$ for HeOr) and (but only for HeOr) those with BN ($P < 0.001, d = 1.00$). Participants who suffered from BN had higher OrNe scores than those with BED ($P < 0.001, d = 1.07$) or those without ED ($P < 0.001, d = 1.67$). Conversely, participants without ED had higher HeOr scores than those with BED ($P < 0.001, d = 0.33$). While participants who were afraid to gain weight had higher OrNe scores than those who did not ($F(1, 1513) = 141.59, P < 0.001, d = -0.68$), that difference

was not statistically significant for HeOr ($F(1, 1513) = 1.60, P = 0.206, d = -0.07$).

OrNe and HeOr scores were associated with engaging in regular physical exercise, with a stronger relationship for HeOr (OrNe: $F(2, 1512) = 4.26, P = 0.014, R = 0.07$; HeOr: $F(2, 1512) = 39.44, P < 0.001, R = 0.22$). Participants who had exercised regularly in the past had higher orthorexia scores than those who had not (OrNe: $P = 0.012, d = 0.25$; HeOr: $P = 0.002, d = 0.29$). Participants who were currently exercising had higher HeOr scores than participants who had exercised in the past ($P = 0.006, d = 0.24$) and those who had not ($P < 0.001, d = 0.53$).

## Correlations between quantitative data for orthorexia nervosa and healthy orthorexia

In line with previous research, there was a medium correlation between both orthorexia scores ($r = 0.40, P < 0.001$). While OrNe scores were negatively correlated with age ($r = -0.07, P = 0.004$), the opposite pattern was observed for HeOr ($r = 0.16, P < 0.001$).

With respect to food choice motives, the highest association for OrNe scores was with Weight Control ($r = 0.42, P < 0.001$), followed by Health and Mood (both $r_s = 0.24, P_s < 0.001$). The lowest (not statistically significant) correlations were with Convenience ($r = 0.02, P = 0.524$) and Price ($r = 0.04, P = 0.114$). The pattern was very different for HeOr, where the strongest association was with Natural Content ($r = 0.60$), followed by Health ($r = 0.49$), Ethical Concerns ($r = 0.34$) and, negatively, with Price ($r = -0.23$) and Convenience ($r = -0.21$, all $p_s < 0.001$). HeOr and Mood were not significantly correlated ($r = 0.02, P = 0.463$).

While the strongest associations between OrNe scores and EDQ dimensions were with Exercise for Weight Control ($r = 0.41$), Insight into Problems ($r = 0.36$), and Interference with Social/Family/Work Life ($r = 0.34$, all $p_s < 0.001$), the smallest correlations were for Stereotyped Behaviour ($r = 0.11, P = 0.001$), Exercise for Social Reasons ($r = 0.12, P < 0.001$), and, notably, a non-statistically significant association with Exercise for Health Reasons ($r = 0.03, P = 0.333$). For HeOr scores, correlations were, overall, smaller. The larger ones were with Positive Reward and Withdrawal Symptoms (both $r_s = 0.25$) and Exercise for Health Reasons ($r = 0.24$, all $p_s < 0.001$), while the smallest (and non-statistically significant) one was with Exercise for Social Reasons ($r = 0.03, P = 0.294$).

The mean correlation between HAQ scores and orthorexia scores was $0.23$ for OrNe (range of $rs$ [0.18, 0.28], all $P_s < 0.001$) and $0.02$ for HeOr (range of $rs$ [-0.03, 0.07], all $P_s \ge 0.070$, except for reassurance-seeking behaviour: $P = 0.006$). With respect to PEC, while the mean correlation was negative for OrNe ($M_r = -0.16$; range of $rs$ from -0.02 for Utilisation to -0.27 for Comprehension), the pattern was positive for HeOr, with a mean correlation of $0.15$ (range of $rs$ [0.12, 0.17]). All the correlations between both orthorexia and PEC scores were statistically significant ($P_s < 0.001$), except for that between OrNe and Utilisation ($P = 0.437$). The personality dimension with the highest correlation with OrNe was Neuroticism ($r = 0.28, P < 0.001$), with Conscientiousness ($r = -0.03, P = 0.186$) and Openness ($r = -0.03, P = 0.904$) presenting non-significant correlations. For HeOr, the strongest association was with Openness ($r = 0.23$), while the other four ranged between -0.13 and 0.19 (all $P_s \le 0.002$).

## Discussion

The purpose of this article was to evaluate OrNe and HeOr in relation to several broad and relevant dimensions in the areas of sociodemographic characteristics, psychopathology and ED.
Regarding ED, significant differences in OrNe scores were found between participants without an ED and those who presented it (whether for AN, BN or – to a lesser extent – BED). When comparing the latter three groups of participants with those who did not have an ED, all the Cohen's *ds* were equal or larger than 1 (very large effect sizes). It is important to clarify these findings to avoid the possible interpretation that OrNe is merely a new way of talking about AN<sup>(33)</sup>. To say that those presenting AN have high scores on OrNe does not equate to saying that those with high scores on OrNe present AN. In line with this, according to DSM-5, a required diagnostic criterion for AN is a significantly low body weight. If OrNe and AN were essentially equivalent, OrNe and weight status would show a much higher association than that which we found. Although underweight individuals had higher OrNe scores, the effect sizes of those differences were moderate. In fact, previous studies have not found systematic associations between BMI and OrNe<sup>(4,34)</sup>. Criterion B for AN includes an intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat. Our results indicated that respondents with this fear showed higher OrNe traits. Donini et al.'s<sup>(2)</sup> assertion that body appearance problems can distinguish AN from OrNe, therefore, appears problematic, as weight concerns (e.g. fear of gaining weight and choosing food for weight control) are clearly associated with OrNe.

OrNe scores were strongly linked to BN but not as much with BED. Several elements help to understand these associations. First, to distinguish purgative AN from BN, the main criterion is weight (underweight for AN *v*. normal weight for BN). Therefore, some participants may oscillate between a diagnosis of AN and BN. However, as the study was cross-sectional, these data could not be captured. Second, the medium-strength positive correlations between OrNe scores and mood-based food choice motivations are important to consider. Indeed, our results suggest that OrNe is associated with emotional eating<sup>(22)</sup>, and this eating pattern is favoured by the medium correlation found between OrNe and Neuroticism. In addition to the dietary restrictions found in OrNe, the presence of emotional eating may explain the presence of binge eating episodes<sup>(35)</sup>. Although previous studies have found contradictory results (positive, negative or no relationship) between ON/OrNe and symptoms of binge eating<sup>(36,37)</sup>, the present association is not surprising. Criterion B of the BN specifies that, unlike BED, outbursts are preceded or followed by inappropriate behaviours aimed at weight loss or maintenance. These behaviours include physical exercise. Our results indicate that OrNe scores were moderately related to exercise for weight control purposes, as well as to interference with daily life. In addition to a strong association between weight control food choices motive and OrNe, compensatory behaviours can also be found. Finally, the association between OrNe scores and BED was weaker, but this is probably due to the body dissatisfaction characteristic of OrNe. In fact, this aspect of the body is not addressed in the diagnosis of BED, whereas it is in the other ED.

However, OrNe may be independent of other ED diagnoses. It is, therefore, possible that OrNe, like binge eating episodes, could be a symptom of an existing ED (AN or BN) but is also a disorder in its own right (like BED). Like other ED<sup>(38,39)</sup>, the results showed that OrNe scores were negatively and moderately associated with emotional competencies but positively with weight control food choice motive<sup>(8)</sup>. Weight control can also be expressed through the adoption of a vegetarian diet, a socially acceptable strategy to control food intake and thus justify caloric restrictions<sup>(40)</sup>. Indeed, higher OrNe scores were observed among partial vegetarians, strict vegetarians and vegans compared with omnivores, with medium

effect sizes. This pattern does not imply, however, that a vegetarian diet is a marker of OrNe, as has been suggested<sup>(2)</sup>, but only that some vegetarians may present with OrNe. Indeed, it is not adherence to a particular diet that is associated with OrNe but rather the rigidification of dietary practices<sup>(3)</sup>. In line with this, the association was higher for HeOr than for OrNe, with an effect size that was more than twice as large.

While motivations for choosing food based on its natural content and ethical concerns are frequently linked to health<sup>(8,41)</sup>, it is interesting to note that these motivations were closely linked to HeOr scores but only very weakly to OrNe scores. In OrNe, the health motive might be used to select and exclude foods that are, for example, too high in calories. This may explain the weak relationship observed between OrNe scores and the frequency of fast-food consumption, as well as the frequency of consumption of organic foods, which were moderate for HeOr scores. In HeOr, health-oriented food choices are probably linked to specific sociodemographic characteristics<sup>(42)</sup>. Indeed, the transition to a healthy diet may have been facilitated by the stability of individuals' professional lives, as well as by the arrival of children. These food choice motivations can also be explained by Conscientiousness, which is positively associated with the adoption of healthy behaviours<sup>(43)</sup>, like consuming healthy food or engaging in physical exercise. Particularly for health reasons, physical exercise was moderately associated with HeOr scores in our study. Although HeOr scores were moderately associated with weight status, AN and weight control food choice motives, it would seem that these results are explained by the moderate correlation found between HeOr and OrNe. To the extent that HeOr scores were not associated with a fear of weight gain, the motivation for weight control could be directly related to health<sup>(44,45)</sup>. Thus, it appears that HeOr is associated with a generally healthy lifestyle<sup>(12)</sup> compared with OrNe. Dietary selectivity for health reasons does not appear to be the dominant factor in OrNe, contrary to what has long been suggested<sup>(46)</sup>.

Regarding other dimensions of psychological functioning and health, our results showed that OrNe scores were moderately and negatively associated with emotional competence, while HeOr scores were positively associated. Moreover, OrNe scores showed small-medium correlations with all dimensions of health anxiety, including interference with life, but none with HeOr<sup>(9)</sup>. It is, therefore, possible that the emotional difficulties found in the OrNe trend are linked to health concerns. Interestingly, these latter associations were not higher in relation to OrNe, even though OrNe is considered to be closely related to eating, an important dimension of health. Connecting this with the fact that OrNe was more strongly correlated with weight control behaviours – both for food choice and physical exercise – we can infer that the pathological dimension of orthorexia is not so much about health and healthy eating. This leads to the intriguing conclusion that, apparently, OrNe is not coherent with even its own definition. This hypothesis is corroborated by our results showing that OrNe scores were unrelated to exercising for health reasons.

In addition, OrNe scores were higher among participants who consulted a healthcare professional at least once a month compared with those who did so less frequently, which was not the case with HeOr. These results may be explained by health reasons or/and health anxiety. OrNe scores were higher when participants reported a chronic illness, food allergy, food intolerance or an ED. Thus, participants with high OrNe trait levels seem to be sicker or perceive themselves as sicker and show more significant health-related concerns, not just those related to
healthy eating. For these people, the change in dietary practice may reflect a desire to get better or to adhere rigidly to dietary prescriptions(2,3).

Regarding HeOr, these scores were also higher when participants reported a food allergy or intolerance, with a small to moderate effect size. HeOr was also moderately related to age. Therefore, individuals with HeOr may have more expertise in their food selectivity than those with OrNe.

When interpreting these results, we must consider the study's limitations. The first is sampling. Most participants were recruited from social networks and are likely to have chosen to participate because they were interested in the topic. This may have influenced the data collected and can explain why the study sample was almost exclusively female. In line with this, we decided to exclude them. If we had retained them, the results of what we would have presented as a mixed-gender sample would have been, in fact, dominated by women. Furthermore, comparisons between genders could not have been adequately conducted with proper statistical power. Thus, although our study has helped to better identify what distinguishes orthorexia from different ED in women, further studies are needed with men to assess the potential existence of gender specificities.

Second, some of our variables are partially overlapped. For instance, professional status or healthcare consultation frequency are each tied to age. We decided to only report associations without any control variables, both because it was not clear which of those control variables we should include and to reduce manuscript length. Future research should attempt to clarify these associations. Nonetheless, age shared less than 1 % of the variance with OrNe and 2·6 % with HeOr, so we expect our results to largely hold if we were to control for these variables.

Third, the Q-EDD is based on DSM-IV criteria. Although the French validation of the Q-EDD shows very good validity(28) and the scoring was adapted to the DSM-5, future studies could consider conducting diagnostic interviews with participants to better relate orthorexia measures and other ED.

Finally, some Cronbach's α coefficients are low, such as those for several of the EDQ subscales. We could have anticipated these problems given the reported alphas in previous studies(27,47). Thus, the results for these subscales should be interpreted with caution, as associations uncorrected for measurement error are systematically biased downward(48). These reliabilities also point to the need for conducting further research to develop alternatives with better psychometric properties. In line with this, when designing our survey, we (inadvertently) did not include Item 14 of the EDQ, which belongs to the Exercise for Weight Control dimension. Applying the Spearman-Brown formula (which allows us to predict the expected reliability in the case of inclusion or exclusion of items like those already present in the questionnaire), if the number of items of that dimension had not been 3 (as in our survey) but 4 (as in the correct version), the Cronbach's α for that dimension would have increased from 0·65 to 0·71. Despite this omission, we believe the results for this dimension remain relevant.

Although some readers may consider it to be a limitation, a key aspect of our approach was to use bidimensional scoring for the two orthorexias. The TOS does not provide a cut-off point beyond which participants can be tagged as presenting with OrNe or HeOr. We consider this to be a strength of this questionnaire – or, at least, not a limitation – for three reasons. First, as there is not yet a consensus concerning how to diagnose OrNe, nor a robust method to do so, no meaningful cut-off point for a self-report can be derived. In other words, we consider that other questionnaires that purportedly allow the diagnosis of OrNe are misleading, as there is

no way to correctly validate that categorisation when presented. Second, using cut-off points reduces available information by transforming a numerical variable into a dichotomous one, reducing statistical power(49). Third, the TOS is aligned with the general trend in psychopathology to consider mental disorders as dimensions, not categories. In the words of Smith et al.(50), 'traditional systems defined mental disorders as categories. This approach is at odds with a vast body of empirical work providing compelling evidence that psychological dysfunction exists along continua'. We agree that diagnostics are sometimes necessary (e.g. insurance and prevalence studies), but in other cases, a dimensional model is preferred.

Our study points to different practical applications (though it does so tentatively, as the study design does not allow the establishment of causal relationships). It seems beneficial to develop the emotional skills of individuals with a tendency to present with OrNe, helping them regulate their negative emotions. Indeed, emotional difficulties are central to ED. In addition, work on the relationship with the body seems important since there is a tendency in OrNe to want to lose weight, whether through dietary restrictions or physical exercise. Similarly, when a patient is identified as having ED (other than OrNe), it seems to us essential that the presence of food obsessions and behaviours focused on the quality of food be regularly questioned. Indeed, numerous studies have shown that ED can turn into OrNe and vice versa(13–15). If this is the case, the patient's relationship with healthy eating needs to be addressed to help him or her shift from a dichotomous vision of food, which is often based on restriction and deprivation. Furthermore, our results suggest that the adoption or promotion of a healthy lifestyle is not connected with OrNe, as they are more tied with HeOr.

## Conclusion

This study is the first to investigate the associations between the biconceptualisation of orthorexia and a broad set of sociodemographic, health, dietary and psychological variables. The findings confirm that each orthorexia – considered dimensionally – is associated with specific modalities of eating and psychological functioning. The results suggest that HeOr is, in general, part of a healthy lifestyle, whether through following a healthy diet or engaging in physical exercise. In contrast, OrNe is more likely to fall into the category of an ED and was associated with more problematic psychological functioning (e.g. health-related anxiety and fear of gaining weight). Future studies could focus on describing how the development of the two orthorexia is articulated over time.

**Acknowledgements.** None.

**Authorship.** Conceptualisation: E.H., E.B. and G.D.; Methodology: E.H., E.B. and G.D.; Validation: E.H., E.B. and G.D.; Formal analysis: E.H. and J.B.; Investigation: E.H.; Data curation: E.H.; Writing – original draft: E.H.; Writing – review and editing: E.H., E.B., J.B. and G.D.; Visualisation: E.H., E.B., J.B. and G.D.; Supervision: G.D. and E.B.; Project administration: E.H., E.B. and G.D.

**Financial Support.** None.

**Competing interests.** None.

**Ethics of human subject participation.** This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University Université Paris Cité (e.g. Université de Paris; N°2020-97). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
## References

1. Lasson C, Rousseau A, Vicente S, et al. (2023) Orthorexic eating behaviors are not all pathological: a French validation of the Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS). *J Eat Disord* **11**, 65.

2. Donini LM, Barrada JR, Barthels F, et al. (2022) A consensus document on definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa. *Eat Weight Disord* **27**, 3695-3711.

3. Bratman S (2017) Orthorexia v. theories of healthy eating. *Eat Weight Disord - Stud Anorex Bulim Obes* **22**, 381-385.

4. Barrada JR & Roncero M (2018) Bidimensional structure of the orthorexia: development and Initial Validation of a New Instrument. *An Psicol Ann Psychol* **34**, 283-291.

5. Zickgraf HF & Barrada JR (2022) Orthorexia nervosa v. healthy orthorexia: relationships with disordered eating, eating behavior, and healthy lifestyle choices. *Eat Weight Disord* **27**, 1313-1325.

6. Mohamed Halim Z, Dickinson KM, Kemps E, et al. (2020) Orthorexia nervosa: examining the Eating Habits Questionnaire's reliability and validity, and its links to dietary adequacy among adult women. *Public Health Nutr* **23**, 1684-1692.

7. Hanras E, Dorard G & Boujut E (2023) Une ou plusieurs orthorexies? Conceptualisation, évaluation et enjeux sociétaux: une revue critique de la littérature (An orthorexia or orthorexias? Conceptualization, evaluation and societal issues: A critical review of the literature). *Psychol Fr* **68**, 559-578.

8. Depa J, Barrada J & Roncero M (2019) Are the motives for food choices different in orthorexia nervosa and healthy orthorexia? *Nutrients* **11**, 697.

9. Chace S & Kluck AS (2022) Validation of the teruel orthorexia scale and relationship to health anxiety in a U.S. sample. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **27**, 1437-1447.

10. Barthels F, Meyer F & Pietrowsky R (2015) Duesseldorf orthorexia scale - construction and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring orthorexic eating behavior. *Z Für Klin Psychol Psychother* **44**, 97-105.

11. Gleaves DH, Graham EC & Ambwani S (2013) Measuring ‘Orthorexia.’ Development of the Eating Habits Questionnaire. *Int J Educ Psychol Assess* **12**, 1-18.

12. Hallit S, Barrada JR, Salameh P, et al. (2021) The relation of orthorexia with lifestyle habits: Arabic versions of the Eating Habits Questionnaire and the Dusseldorf Orthorexia Scale. *J Eat Disord* **9**, 102.

13. Barthels F, Meyer F, Huber T, et al. (2017) Orthorexic eating behaviour as a coping strategy in patients with anorexia nervosa. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **22**, 269-276.

14. Brytek-Matera A, Rogoza R, Gramaglia C, et al. (2015) Predictors of orthorexic behaviours in patients with eating disorders: a preliminary study. *BMC Psychiatry* **15**, 1-8.

15. DeBois K & Chatfield SL (2021) Misinformation, thin-ideal internalization, and resistance to treatment: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of the experience of orthorexia nervosa. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **26**, 1963-1973.

16. Strahler J, Wachten H & Mueller-Alcazar A (2021) Obsessive healthy eating and orthorexic eating tendencies in sport and exercise contexts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *J Behav Addict* **10**, 456-470.

17. Kiss-Leizer M, Tóth-Király I & Rigó A (2019) How the obsession to eat healthy food meets with the willingness to do sports: the motivational background of orthorexia nervosa. *Eat Weight Disord* **24**, 465-472.

18. Barthels F, Horn S & Pietrowsky R (2021) Orthorexic eating behaviour, illness anxiety and dysfunctional cognitions characteristic of somatic symptom disorders in a non-clinical sample. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **26**, 2387-2391.

19. Obeid S, Hallit S, Akel M, et al. (2021) Orthorexia nervosa and its association with alexithymia, emotion dysregulation and disordered eating attitudes among Lebanese adults. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **26**, 2607-2616.

20. Strahler J, Wachten H, Neuhof S, et al. (2022) Psychological correlates of excessive healthy and orthorexic eating: emotion regulation, attachment, and anxious-depressive-stress symptomatology. *Front Nutr* **9**, 817047.

21. Vuillier L, Robertson S & Greville-Harris M (2020) Orthorexic tendencies are linked with difficulties with emotion identification and regulation. *J Eat Disord* **8**, 15.

22. Barthels F, Barrada JR & Roncero M (2019) Orthorexia nervosa and healthy orthorexia as new eating styles. *PLoS ONE* **14**, e0219609.

23. Strahler J, Haddad C, Salameh P, et al. (2020) Cross-cultural differences in orthorexic eating behaviors: associations with personality traits. *Nutr Burbank Los Angel Cty Calif* **77**, 110811.

24. Awad E, Salameh P, Sacre H, et al. (2022) Association between impulsivity and healthy orthorexia: any moderating role of personality traits? *Psychol Health Med* **27**, 1832-1841.

25. Maïano C, Aimé A, Almenara CA, et al. (2022) Psychometric properties of the Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS) among a French-Canadian adult sample. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **27**, 3457-3467.

26. Hanras E, Mathieu S, Chevrier B, et al. (2022) Vegans, strict vegetarians, partial vegetarians, omnivores: do they differ in food choice motives, coping, and quality of life? *Presse Médicale Open* **3**, 100033.

27. Kern L & Baudin N (2011) Validation française du questionnaire de dépendance de l'exercice physique (Exercise dependence questionnaire: A French validation). *Eur Rev Appl Psychol* **61**, 205-211.

28. Callahan S, Rousseau A, Knotter A, et al. (2003) Les troubles alimentaires: présentation d'un outil de diagnostic et résultats d'une étude épidémiologique chez les adolescents (Diagnosing eating disorders: Presentation of a new diagnostic test and an initial epidemiological study of eating disorders in adolescents). *L'Encephale* **29**, 239-247.

29. Bridou M (2012) Etude des principaux freins et leviers psychologiques envers l'examen de dépistage du cancer colorectal: Le rôle particulier de l'anxiété envers la santé dans l'adoption de cette démarche (Study of the main psychological barriers and levers towards colorectal cancer screening examination: The particular role of health anxiety in the adoption of this approach). These de doctorat, Tours, Univesity of Tours.

30. Brasseur S, Grégoire J, Bourdu R, et al. (2013) The Profile of Emotional Competence (PEC): development and validation of a self-reported measure that fits dimensions of emotional competence theory. *PLoS ONE* **8**, e62635.

31. Plaisant O, Courtois R, Réveillère C, et al. (2010) Validation par analyse factorielle du Big Five Inventory français (BFI-Fr). Analyse convergente avec le NEO-PI-R (Factor structure and internal reliability of the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr). Convergent and discriminant validation with the NEO-PI-R). *Ann Méd-Psychol* **168**, 97-106. Elsevier Masson.

32. Cohen J (1988) *Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences*, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

33. Bhattacharya A, Cooper M, McAdams C, et al. (2022) Cultural shifts in the symptoms of anorexia nervosa: the case of Orthorexia nervosa. *Appetite* **170**, 105869.

34. Godefroy V, Trinchera L & Dorard G (2021) Optimizing the empirical assessment of orthorexia nervosa through EHQ and clarifying its relationship with BMI. *Eat Weight Disord - Stud Anorex Bulim Obes* **26**, 649-659.

35. Macht M (2008) How emotions affect eating: a five-way model. *Appetite* **50**, 1-11.

36. Barthels F, Kisser J & Pietrowsky R (2021) Orthorexic eating behavior and body dissatisfaction in a sample of young females. *Eat Weight Disord EWD* **26**, 2059-2063.

37. Brytek-Matera A, Onieva-Zafra MD, Parra-Fernández ML, et al. (2020) Evaluation of orthorexia nervosa and symptomatology associated with eating disorders among European university students: a multicentre cross-sectional study. *Nutrients* **12**, 3716.

38. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z & Shafran R (2003) Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a 'transdiagnostic' theory and treatment. *Behav Res Ther* **41**, 509-528.

39. Monell E, Clinton D & Birgegård A (2018) Emotion dysregulation and eating disorders-associations with diagnostic presentation and key symptoms. *Int J Eat Disord* **51**, 921-930.

40. O'Connor MA, Touyz SW, Dunn SM, et al. (1987) Vegetarianism in anorexia nervosa? A review of 116 consecutive cases. *Med J Aust* **147**, 540-542.

41. Milošević J, Žeželj I, Gorton M, et al. (2012) Understanding the motives for food choice in Western Balkan Countries. *Appetite* **58**, 205-214.

42. Kesse-Guyot E, Lairon D, Allès B, et al. (2022) Key findings of the French BioNutriNet project on organic food-based diets: description,
determinants, and relationships to health and the environment. *Adv Nutr* **13**, 208–224.

43. Gartland N, Wilson A, Lawton R, et al. (2021) Conscientiousness and engagement with national health behaviour guidelines. *Psychol Health Med* **26**, 421–432.

44. Oberle CD, Samaghabadi RO & Hughes EM (2017) Orthorexia nervosa: assessment and correlates with gender, BMI, and personality. *Appetite* **108**, 303–310.

45. Varga M, Dukay-Szabó S, Túry F, et al. (2013) Evidence and gaps in the literature on orthorexia nervosa. *Eat Weight Disord - Stud Anorex Bulim Obes* **18**, 103–111.

46. Dunn TM & Bratman S (2016) On orthorexia nervosa: a review of the literature and proposed diagnostic criteria. *Eat Behav* **21**, 11–17.

47. Ogden J, Veale D & Summers Z (1997) The development and validation of the Exercise Dependence Questionnaire. *Addict Res* **5**, 343–355.

48. Fan X (2003) Two approaches for correcting correlation attenuation caused by measurement error: implications for research practice. *Educ Psychol Meas* **63**, 915–930.

49. Cohen J (1983) The cost of dichotomization. *Appl Psychol Meas* **7**, 249–253.

50. Smith GT, Atkinson EA, Davis HA, et al. (2020) The general factor of psychopathology. *Annu Rev Clin Psychol* **16**, 75–98.