This study investigates jurisprudential issues in acts of worship that are specifically defined by a one-month period, presenting a comparative analysis to highlight areas of consensus and disagreement among scholars. Structured into an introduction, two chapters, and a conclusion, the first chapter clarifies key terms—jurisprudence, worship-related jurisprudence, and the concept of a month—while the second chapter compiles and examines the relevant issues. Using an analytical inductive approach, the research emphasizes the significance of identifying and studying time-bound rulings, noting their prevalence across classical jurisprudential texts. It distinguishes between rulings grounded in textual evidence and those derived from scholarly reasoning, ultimately presenting the most substantiated opinions on each issue.