# Sera From Patients With Minimal Change Disease Increase Endothelial Permeability to Sodium

Florence Daviet, Muriel Blin, Karim Fallague, Richard Bachelier, Manon Laforêt, Manon Carré, Stéphane Poitevin, Francoise Dignat-George, Marcel Blot-Chabaud, Nathalie Bardin, et al.

► To cite this version:

Florence Daviet, Muriel Blin, Karim Fallague, Richard Bachelier, Manon Laforêt, et al. Sera From Patients With Minimal Change Disease Increase Endothelial Permeability to Sodium. Kidney International Reports, 2020, 5 (7), pp.1071-1075. 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.010. hal-03176703

HAL Id: hal-03176703

https://amu.hal.science/hal-03176703

Submitted on 22 Mar 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Sera From Patients With Minimal Change Disease Increase Endothelial Permeability to Sodium

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

Florence Daviet<fnref n="1" />,², Muriel G. Blin<fnref n="1" />, Karim Fallague<fnref n="1" />, Richard Bachelier<fnref n="1" />, Manon Laforêt<fnref n="1" />,², Manon Carré³, Stéphane Poitevin<fnref n="1" />, Françoise Dignat-George<fnref n="1" />, Marcel Blot-Chabaud<fnref n="1" />, Nathalie Bardin<fnref n="1" />,⁴, Stéphane Burtey<fnref n="1" />,², Noémie Jourde-Chiche<fnref n="1" />,²,<fnref n="5" /> and Aurélie S. Leroyer<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="5" />

**Correspondence:** Noémie Jourde-Chiche, Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital de la Conception, Assis-
tance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 147 Bd Baille, 13005 Marseille, France. E-mail: noemie.jourde@ap-hm.fr

**Received 20 June 2019; revised 4 April 2020; accepted 10 April 2020; published online 20 April 2020**

Kidney Int Rep (2020) 5, 1071–1075; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.010

© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Edema is the main symptom of nephrotic syndrome associated to minimal change disease (MCD). Besides the increase in glomerular permeability, possibly induced by a circulating permeability factor,<fnref n="1" /> an increase in systemic vascular permeability could participate in the constitution of edema.

This study was conducted to evaluate the permeability of endothelial cells (EC) exposed to serum from nephrotic patients with MCD, to low- or high-molecular-weight molecules, by trans- or paracellular transport.

## RESULTS

### MCD Serum Induces an Increase in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Permeability In Vitro

First, we evaluated the effect of MCD serum on the global permeability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) via the xCELLigence Real Time Cell Analyzer system (ACEA Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA) (Figure 1a). We observed a significant decrease in the impedance, reflecting an increased permeability, with sera from MCD patients compared to sera from healthy volunteers (HVs) (Figure 1b).

Second, we compared the endothelial permeability, via the Transwell system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), for FITC-Dextran, a high-molecular-weight (HMW) molecule (40kDa), and for sodium

fluoresceine (NaF), a low-molecular-weight (LMW) molecule (276 Da) (Figure 2a). No difference was observed between MCD patient and HV sera in terms of passage of FITC-Dextran (Supplementary Figure S1). Conversely, the passage of a NaF through the HUVEC monolayer was significantly greater at 15, 45, and 60 minutes after stimulation with MCD patient sera compared to HV sera (Figure 2b).

We therefore demonstrated an increased permeability of HUVEC *in vitro* after stimulation by sera of patients with MCD, probably restricted to LMW molecules such as sodium.

### Paracellular Permeability Is Not Affected by MCD Patient Serum

We evaluated *in vitro*, by western blot analysis, the quantity of vascular endothelial (VE)—cadherin (total and phosphorylated), reflecting paracellular permeability (tight junctions). No difference was observed between MCD patient and HV sera (Supplementary Figure S2A and B).

We then evaluated *in vivo* the paracellular permeability induced by the sera of patients, injected in the skin of mice, using the Miles Assay technique. The extravasation of Evans blue dye, a molecule strongly bound to albumin, did not differ between skin zones injected with MCD patient and HV sera (Supplementary Figure S2C).

<footnote n="1">¹Aix-Marseille University, Centre de recherche en CardioVasculaire et Nutrition, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale 1263, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement 1260, Marseille, France;
²Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France;
³Aix-Marseille University, Centre de Recherche en Oncologie Biologique et Oncopharmacologie, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale unité mixte de recherche 911, Marseille, France; and ⁴Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵These authors contributed equally to this work.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Sera from minimal change disease (MCD) patients increase human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) permeability evaluated by impedance *in vitro*. (a) The xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyzer system (ACEA Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA) allows the evaluation of the permeability of a monolayer of endothelial cells (i.e., HUVECs), seeded in the wells of an electronic microtiter plate. The cellular impedance is measured from the beginning of HUVEC culture, and HUVECs are stimulated with sera once they have reached confluence. (b) Results obtained after stimulation of confluent HUVECs by MCD patient sera (n = 10) and healthy volunteer (HV) sera (n = 11). The steeper slope observed with MCD compared to HV sera reflects an increased permeability of HUVEC monolayer. The slopes of impedance curves were measured between T0 and T45 minutes from the beginning of stimulation with sera. The MCD patient sera induce a greater permeability than the HV sera. \*P = 0.0276.</figcaption></figure>

## Transcellular Permeability of HUVECs Is
Increased by MCD Patient Serum

Without Involvement of Caveolin 1

The quantity of Caveolin 1 was not different in lysates of HUVECs stimulated with MCD patient or HV sera in western blot analysis (Supplementary Figure S3A and B).

The transfection of HUVEC with small interfering ribonucleic acids (siRNAs) targeting Caveolin 1 decreased the expression of this protein compared to control siRNA (Supplementary Figure S3C) but did not modify the increased permeability to NaF after stimulation with MCD patient sera.

### With a Role of Endothelial Sodium Channel
Activation by Serine Proteases

We evaluated the role of endothelial sodium channels in the increased permeability due to MCD patient sera. The HUVECs were incubated in the Transwell system with MCD or HV sera with or without amiloride, an inhibitor of sodium channels such as ENaC (Figure 3a). The increase

in NaF permeability induced by MCD patient sera was significantly reversed by amiloride (P = 0.0499).

We then evaluated the role of serine proteases in the increased endothelial permeability due to MCD patient sera. The HUVECs were incubated with MCD patient or HV sera with or without aprotinin, an inhibitor of serine proteases (Figure 3b). The increase in NaF permeability induced by MCD patient sera was reversed by aprotinin (P = 0.0465). In addition, the baseline endothelial permeability of endothelium with HV sera was reduced with aprotinin.

To determine whether the channel involved in this increased endothelial permeability to sodium was the endothelial ENaC, we studied ENaC subunits using western blot analyses. We did not detect any differences with MCD patient or HV sera in the cleavage of the ENaC-α, -β, or -γ subunits (Supplementary Figure S4A–C).

## DISCUSSION

In the present study, we show that serum from MCD patients increases the permeability of cultured EC to
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Sera from minimal change disease (MCD) patients increase human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) permeability to sodium *in vitro*. (a) The passage of sodium fluorescein (NaF, 276 Da) is measured across a semipermeable membrane from the Transwell system at different times (15, 30, and 45 minutes and 1 hour) after stimulation of confluent HUVECs by patient sera. (b) Results are expressed as the ratio of the fluorescence intensity between the lower and upper chambers of the Transwell system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). More passage of NaF was observed at T15, T45, and T60 minutes after stimulation with MCD patient sera (n = 5) compared to healthy volunteer (HV) sera (n = 5). \*P < 0.05.</figcaption></figure>

sodium through a transcellular pathway involving a
sodium channel inhibited by amiloride and aprotinin.

Edema is a major clinical symptom in patients with MCD, favored both by decreased oncotic pressure (hypoalbuminemia) and by increased renal sodium reabsorption (activation of tubular ENaC in the collecting duct), and possibly by still-unidentified factors.² Indeed, a permeability factor in MCD has been sought for decades,¹ but mainly to determine the cause of albumin leakage through the glomerular filtration barrier,¹,³ whereas we propose here a role of systemic endothelial permeability to explain the brutal constitution of edema. In fact, we demonstrate that MCD patient sera increase endothelial permeability to

sodium, thus allowing a large passage of sodium and
fluid in the interstitial space.

One of the major roles of the vascular endothelium is
to provide a selective barrier between blood circulation
and tissue. This selective permeability is controlled by
intercellular junctions (tight and adherent junctions,
regulating paracellular permeability), transport
through the endothelium (transcellular permeability),
and interactions between EC and pericytes.⁴ The
transcellular permeability involves caveolae, which are
invaginations of the plasma membrane structured
mainly around caveolin-1; transcellular pores or chan-
nels allowing passage of LMW solutes; and ves-
iculovacuolar organelles.⁵ In this work, we show that
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** The increased permeability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to sodium is reversed by amiloride and by aprotinin. (a) Measurement of the sodium fluorescein (NaF) passage through a semipermeable membrane of the Transwell system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) after stimulation of HUVECs by sera from minimal change disease (MCD) patients or healthy volunteers (HVs), with or without addition of amiloride (1 µM), 15 minutes after the start of stimulation. The results are expressed as the ratio of the fluorescence intensity between the lower and upper chambers. The increased permeability of HUVECs to NaF induced by MCD patient sera is reversed by amiloride (*P* = 0.0499). Amiloride has no effect on HUVEC permeability after stimulation with HV sera. \* *P* < 0.05. (b) Measurement of the sodium fluorescein (NaF) passage through a semipermeable membrane of the Transwell system after stimulation of HUVEC by sera from MCD patients or HV, with or without adjunction of aprotinin (100 µg/ml), 15 minutes after the start of stimulation. The increased permeability of HUVEC to NaF induced by MCD patient sera is reversed by aprotinin (*P* = 0.0317). Aprotinin also reduced the permeability of HUVECs after stimulation with HV sera. \* *P* < 0.05.</figcaption></figure>

only transcellular permeability is affected by MCD patient serum, and exclude a role of caveolin 1.

We demonstrate an increase in vascular permeability to sodium, which is reversed by amiloride, and by aprotinin. Some animal and human data support the use of amiloride, as an inhibitor of ENaC, in nephrotic patients.⁶⁻⁸ ENaC is a sodium channel mainly expressed by the distal and collecting tubule, which is activated after the cleavage of its α- and γ-subunits by serine proteases such as plasmin.⁸ In nephrotic syndrome, an aberrant filtration of blood serine proteases leads to an increased urinary excretion of these proteases and exposure of ENaC to their proteolytic properties, with increased ENaC activation and sodium reabsorption.⁸ A high serine protease activity is observed in the urine of nephrotic patients,⁸ which resolves after remission, and the fluid overload of nephrotic patients is correlated with their urinary excretion of serine proteases.⁵¹ Moreover, the systemic administration of aprotinin, a protease inhibitor, prevents the formation of edema in nephrotic mice, despite a similar level of proteinuria.⁹

ENaC, in addition to its renal localization, is also expressed in the endothelium, where it is involved in morphological and mechanical properties.³,S2,S³ Here, although we show that both amiloride and aprotinin reverse the increase in salt permeability of ECs exposed to nephrotic serum, we observe no differential cleavage of ENaC by western blot. These results do not rule out a role for ENaC in the endothelial permeability to sodium induced by MCD patient serum. In particular, the use of undiluted serum (instead of 1/10 diluted serum)

would have been closer to the *in vivo* conditions and may have revealed a differential cleavage of ENaC by western blot. However, ENaC is not the only sodium channel inhibited by amiloride.⁵⁴ Another hypothesis is that another endothelial sodium channel, also inhibited by amiloride and activated by a serine protease present in the serum of healthy controls and increased in the serum of MCD patients, could be implicated in this increased endothelial permeability.

In nephrotic patients, the benefit of amiloride could be related not only to its diuretic properties but also to the reduction of endothelial salt permeability and fluid leakage. Our work also suggests that the baseline physiological activity of endothelial sodium channels could be maintained by serine proteases, as HUVEC permeability to sodium was reduced in the presence of aprotinin.

There are several limitations to our study. First, because of the limited amount of serum available for each patient, we used diluted sera in all experiments, and this may have blunted the effect of MCD patient serum. Future research in the field may benefit from the use of undiluted, or less diluted, serum. Second, our experiment model based on HUVECs does not include the pericytes or vascular wall, which also participate in vascular permeability. Yet, because edema probably arise from capillary leaks, a monolayer of HUVECs may be a relevant model in this setting. Third, only MCD patient sera were tested, without nephrotic or non-nephrotic controls from patients with other kidney diseases, and the specificity of this endothelial permeability cannot be asserted. Finally, we have not identified the permeability factor of MCD, or the sodium
channel that it activates. However, this work highlights the fact that the permeability factor of MCD may not be solely a glomerular one (allowing the leakage of albumin through the glomerular filtration barrier), but also a systemic one, allowing the leakage of sodium in the interstitial space, possibly through the activation of an endothelial sodium channel by proteases.

In conclusion, this original work shows, for the first time, an increased endothelial permeability induced by sera from patients with MCD, allowing the passage of sodium through the endothelium, probably participating in the constitution of edema, and reversed by amiloride and by aprotinin.

## DISCLOSURE

All the authors declared no competing interests.

## SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary File (Word)

**Supplementary Material and Methods.**

**Table S1.** Patient characteristics.

**Figure S1.** Sera from MCD patients do not modify the permeability of HUVEC to high molecular weight molecules *in vitro*.

**Figure S2.** The increase in HUVEC permeability is not due to paracellular pathway modifications.

**Figure S3.** The increase of the HUVEC permeability for low molecular weight molecules *in vitro* is not linked to the Caveolin 1 pathway.

**Figure S4.** The cleavage of ENaC *in vitro* is not increased by MCD sera.

**Supplementary References.**

## REFERENCES

1. Maas RJ, Deegens JK, Wetzels JF. Permeability factors in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: historical perspectives and lessons for the future. *Nephrol Dial Transplant*. 2014;1(29):2207-2216.

2. Ellis D. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of edema in childhood nephrotic syndrome. *Front Pediatr*. 2016;3:111.

3. Warnock DG, Kusche-Vihrog K, Tarjus A, et al. Blood pressure and amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in vascular and renal cells. *Nat Rev Nephrol*. 2014;10:146-157.

4. Goddard LM, Iruela-Arispe ML. Cellular and molecular regulation of vascular permeability. *Thromb Haemost*. 2013;109:407-415.

5. Sowa G. Caveolae, caveolins, cavins, and endothelial cell function: new insights. *Front Physiol*. 2012;2:120.

6. Lourdel S, Loffing J, Favre G, et al. Hyperaldosteronemia and activation of the epithelial sodium channel are not required for sodium retention in puromycin-induced nephrosis. *J Am Soc Nephrol*. 2005;16:3642-3650.

7. Svenningsen P, Bistrup C, Friis UG, et al. Plasmin in nephrotic urine activates the epithelial sodium channel. *J Am Soc Nephrol*. 2009;20:299-310.

8. Artunc F, Wörn M, Schork A, Bohnert BN. Proteasuria—the impact of active urinary proteases on sodium retention in nephrotic syndrome. *Acta Physiol*. 2019;225:e13249.

9. Bohnert BN, Menacher M, Janessa A, et al. Aprotinin prevents proteolytic epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) activation and volume retention in nephrotic syndrome. *Kidney Int*. 2018;93:159-172.

# Type IV Collagen Mutations in Familial IgA Nephropathy

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

Yifu Li<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="10" />, Emily E. Groopman<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="10" />, Vivette D'Agati², Sindhuri Prakash<fnref n="1" />, Junying Zhang<fnref n="1" />, Malgorzata Mizerska-Wasiak³, Yasar Caliskan⁴, David Fasel<fnref n="1" />, Hussein H. Karnib⁵, Luisa Bono⁶, Sadek Al Omran⁷, Essam Al Sabban⁷, Krzysztof Kiryluk<fnref n="1" />, Gianluca Caridi⁸, Gian Marco Ghiggeri⁸, Simone Sanna-Cherchi<fnref n="1" />, Francesco Scolari⁹ and Ali G. Gharavi<fnref n="1" />

**Correspondence:** Ali Gharavi, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 St. Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion 413, New York, New York 10032, USA. E-mail: ag2239@columbia.edu

**Received 1 February 2020; revised 23 March 2020; accepted 10 April 2020; published online 24 April 2020**

*Kidney Int Rep* (2020) 5, 1075–1078; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.011

© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

<footnote n="1">¹Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; ²Division of Renal Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; ³Department of Pediatrics and Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; ⁴Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; ⁵Department of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; ⁶Nephrology Dialysis with Renal Transplant Department, Civico and Di Cristina Hospital, Palermo, Italy; ⁷King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (KFSHRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; ⁸Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Istituto G. Gaslini Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Genoa, Italy; and ⁹Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="10">¹⁰These authors are co-first authors.</footnote>