A CARMIL2 gain-of-function mutation suffices to
trigger most CD28 costimulatory functions in vivo

Fanghui Zhang, Javier Celis-Gutierrez, Lichen Zhang, Valentin Mellado, Léna Gelard, Sophie Panigot, Daiki Mori, Liaoxun Lu, Guillaume Voisinne, Carine Vilarnau Wolek, et al.

► To cite this version:

Fanghui Zhang, Javier Celis-Gutierrez, Lichen Zhang, Valentin Mellado, Léna Gelard, et al. A CARMIL2 gain-of-function mutation suffices to trigger most CD28 costimulatory functions in vivo. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2025, 222 (8), pp.e20250339. 10.1084/jem.20250339. hal-05390008

HAL Id: hal-05390008

https://hal.science/hal-05390008v1

Submitted on 12 Dec 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
ARTICLE

# A CARMIL2 gain-of-function mutation suffices to trigger most CD28 costimulatory functions in vivo

Fanghui Zhang<sup>1,2,*</sup>①, Javier Celis-Gutierrez<sup>1,*</sup>①, Lichen Zhang<sup>2</sup>①, Valentin Mellado<sup>1,3</sup>①, Léna Gelard<sup>1</sup>①, Sophie Panigot<sup>1,3</sup>①, Daiki Mori<sup>1,3</sup>①,
Liaoxun Lu<sup>2</sup>①, Guillaume Voisinne<sup>1</sup>①, Carine Vilarnau Wolek<sup>1,3</sup>①, Marielle Mello<sup>3</sup>①, Odile Burlet-Schiltz<sup>4</sup>①, Anne Gonzalez de Peredo<sup>4</sup>①,
Frédéric Fiore<sup>3</sup>①, Romain Roncagalli<sup>1</sup>①, Yinming Liang<sup>2,5</sup>①, Marie Malissen<sup>1,2,3,6**</sup>①, and Bernard Malissen<sup>1,2,3,6**</sup>①

Naive T cell activation requires both TCR and CD28 signals. The CARMIL2 cytosolic protein enables CD28-dependent activation of the NF-κB transcription factor via its ability to link CD28 to the CARD11 adaptor protein. Here, we developed mice expressing a mutation named *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* and mimicking a mutation found in human T cell malignancies. Naive T cells from *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* mice contained preformed CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes in numbers comparable to those assembling in wild-type T cells after CD28 engagement. Such ready-made CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes also formed in CD28-deficient mice where they unexpectedly induced most of the functions that normally result from CD28 engagement in a manner that remains antigen-dependent. In turn, tumor-specific T cells expressing *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* do not require CD28 engagement and thereby escape to both PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. In conclusion, we uncovered the overarching role played by CARMIL2-CARD11 signals among those triggered by CD28 and exploited them to induce potent solid tumor-specific T cell responses in the absence of CD28 ligands and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

## Introduction

Although essential, TCR signals are not sufficient for the optimal activation of naive T cells. Concomitant CD28 signals are also required to promote the activation and differentiation of naive T cells into effector and memory T cells and to control peripheral tolerance by contributing to the development and function of regulatory T (T<sub>reg</sub>) cells (Carter and Pomerantz, 2022; Vang et al., 2010). The importance of CD28 costimulation has been demonstrated by the failure of CD28-deficient mice to produce T cell-dependent antibody responses and to clear certain infections (Ferguson et al., 1996; McSorley and Jenkins, 2000; Shahinian et al., 1993; Welten et al., 2015). These findings have led to the “two-signal model” of naive T cell activation in which signal 1 is delivered by the TCR after recognition of antigenic peptides bound to MHC molecules and signal 2 is provided by CD28 after binding to its CD80 (B7.1) and CD86 (B7.2) ligands expressed on immunogenic antigen-presenting cells (APC) (Burke et al., 2024). CD28 costimulation also plays a crucial role during the activation of antigen-experienced T cells such as tumor-specific effector T cells (Agarwal et al., 2023; Duraiswamy et al., 2021; Kamphorst et al., 2017; Magen et al.,

2023), and the rescue of exhausted CD8+ T cells by PD-1-targeted therapies (Kamphorst et al., 2017). The protein-protein interaction motifs found in the CD28 cytoplasmic tail trigger multiple signaling pathways. Their respective contributions to the developmental and functional outcomes resulting from CD28 costimulation remain, however, controversial (Pagán et al., 2012).

A loss-of-function mutation in the mouse *Carmil2* gene demonstrated that the capping protein regulator and myosin 1 linker 2 (CARMIL2) protein it encodes is dispensable for the delivery of TCR signals but essential for CD28 costimulation (Liang et al., 2013). CARMIL2 (also known as RLTPR) is a multidomain cytosolic protein that participates in the CD28 microclusters that form at the immunological synapse where it connects CD28 to the CARD11 adaptor protein (Liang et al., 2013). It allows subsequent phosphorylation of the recruited CARD11 molecules (also known as CARMA1) by TCR-activated protein serine/threonine kinases and in turn leads to the assembly of CARD11-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complexes capable of activating the NF-κB transcription factor, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and the MALT1 protease (Roncagalli et al., 2016; Ruland and Hartjes,

<footnote n="1">¹Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy (CIML), Aix Marseille Université, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Marseille, France; ²School of Medical Technology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang City, China; ³Centre d'Immunophénomique (CIPHE), Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, CNRS, Marseille, France; ⁴Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale (IPBS), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UPS), Toulouse, France; ⁵Laboratory of Mouse Genetics, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang City, China; ⁶Laboratory of Immunophenomics, School of Medical Technology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang City, China.</footnote>

<footnote>*F. Zhang. and J. Celis-Gutierrez contributed equally to this paper; **M. Malissen and B. Malissen contributed equally to this paper. Correspondence to Bernard Malissen: bernardm@ciml.univ-mrs.fr; Marie Malissen: malissen@ciml.univ-mrs.fr.</footnote>

<footnote>© 2025 Zhang et al. This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

2019). The scaffolding function of CARMIL2 was further confirmed by the identification of both CD28 and CARD11 in the set of proteins that associate with CARMIL2 following CD28 engagement and form the CARMIL2 interactome (Liu et al., 2018; Roncagalli et al., 2016).

T cells from CARMIL2-deficient patients also showed normal TCR-mediated signals and defective CD28-mediated NF-κB activation (Lévy et al., 2023; Schober et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2016), suggesting that CARMIL2 molecules exert overlapping functions in mouse and human T cells. A CARMIL2 point mutation denoted as CARMIL2 p.Q575E and corresponding to a non-conservative substitution of the glutamine residue found at position 575 by a glutamic acid has been identified in 3% of human cutaneous T cell lymphoma and acute T cell leukemia (Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021). When overexpressed in human Jurkat leukemic T cells, CARMIL2Q575E molecules constitutively associated with CARD11 molecules, leading to augmented NF-κB activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) mRNA expression following stimulation with pharmacologic TCR mimics (Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021). Here, we developed gene-edited mice expressing a mutation orthologous to CARMIL2 p.Q575E and denoted as *Carmil2*Q538E (in short *Carmil2*QE), and we determined its effects on the development and function of mouse T cells in vivo. Naive T cells from *Carmil2*QE mice contained preformed CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes in numbers comparable to those that assemble in naive wild-type (WT) T cells after CD28 engagement. Considering that those preformed CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes can be generated irrespective of CD28 expression, we surmised that their phosphorylation by TCR-operated serine/threonine kinases should generate functional CBM complexes in the absence of CD28 engagement. Consistent with this hypothesis, when expressed in CD28-deficient mice, those “ready-made” CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes induced proper thymic T~reg~ cell development, an outcome known to specifically require CD28-CARMIL2-CARD11 signals (Carter and Pomerantz, 2022; Liang et al., 2013; Tai et al., 2005; Vang et al., 2010). It provided the unique opportunity to assess the importance of the CARMIL2-CARD11 signaling branch among the multiple signaling branches triggered by CD28. Unexpectedly, the expression of the *Carmil2*QE mutation in CD28-deficient mice triggered most of the known developmental and functional consequences resulting from CD28 costimulation in vivo and it occurred in a manner that remained dependent on TCR signals. Therefore, our results uncover the overarching role of CARMIL2-CARD11-driven signals among those triggered by CD28 in vivo and we demonstrated that they can be exploited to generate potent tumor-specific CD8⁺ T cells that do not require CD28 engagement and thereby escape to both PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition.

# Results

## Effects of the CARMIL2QE mutation on physiological Jurkat T cell activation

The mouse *Carmil2* gene gives rise to several transcripts via alternative splicing. We originally described a mouse *Carmil2* transcript sequence coding for functional CARMIL2 proteins

(Liang et al., 2013; Roncagalli et al., 2016). Its human ortholog is denoted as isoform 3 and also codes for functional CARMIL2 proteins (Lévy et al., 2023; Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021). The human *CARMIL2* Q575E mutation has been numbered on the basis of human isoform 1, which codes for nonfunctional CARMIL2 proteins due to an adventitious insertion into exon 14 (Lévy et al., 2023; Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021). To conform to the functional isoform 3 amino acid sequence, the human *CARMIL2* Q575E mutation has been renumbered here as *CARMIL2* Q539E (abbreviated as *CARMIL2*Q539E or *CARMIL2*QE) and its mouse counterpart as *Carmil2* Q538E (abbreviated as *Carmil2*Q538E or *Carmil2*QE).

To assess the effects of the *CARMIL2*QE mutation on human T cells stimulated with physiological triggers, Jurkat T cells were stimulated with Raji lymphoblastoid B cells that present the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin E (SEE) and express CD28 ligands. In this model, IL-2 production requires both TCR and CARMIL2-mediated CD28 signals, whereas CD69 expression only requires TCR signals and in turn can occur in the absence of CARMIL2 expression (Roncagalli et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2015). To facilitate biochemical analysis, the two endogenous copies of the Jurkat *CARMIL2* gene were edited to produce CARMIL2 or *CARMIL2*QE proteins tagged with an affinity Twin-Strep-tag (OST) and it did not affect CD3 and CD28 surface levels (Fig. 1 A). The resulting *CARMIL2*OST and *CARMIL2*QE-OST proteins were expressed at 1.5-fold lower levels than WT CARMIL2 proteins (Fig. 1, B and C). Affinity purification and immunoblot analysis showed that the association between *CARMIL2*OST and CARD11 required prior TCR-CD28 stimulation, whereas *CARMIL2*QE-OST molecules were already associated with CARD11 in the absence of TCR-CD28 stimulation (Fig. 1, D and E). The levels of *CARMIL2*QE-OST-CARD11 complexes present prior to activation further increased 1.5-fold following TCR-CD28 engagement. Importantly, stimulation of *CARMIL2*OST Jurkat T cells with anti-CD3 alone failed to trigger the assembly of CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes (Fig. 1 F), demonstrating the specific contribution of CD28 engagement to the assembly of CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes in WT T cells. After stimulation with Raji B cells in the presence of SEE, *CARMIL2*OST and *CARMIL2*QE-OST Jurkat cells expressed levels of CD69 comparable to WT Jurkat cells (Fig. 1 G), whereas IL-2 production by *CARMIL2*QE-OST Jurkat T cells was increased threefold as compared to WT and *CARMIL2*OST Jurkat cells (Fig. 1 H). Therefore, congruent with former studies using Jurkat cells overexpressing *CARMIL2*QE molecules and pharmacological mimics of TCR stimulation (Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021), human *CARMIL2*QE proteins expressed at close to physiological levels induced the formation of *CARMIL2*QE-CARD11 complexes in unstimulated Jurkat cells resulting in a specific increase in IL-2 production following physiological TCR-CD28 stimulation.

## Resting *Carmil2*QE mouse T cells contain preformed *CARMIL2*QE-CARD11 complexes

Considering that the glutamine residue corresponding to the human *CARMIL2*QE mutation and its flanking residues are conserved in mouse (Zwolak et al., 2013), we determined next whether resting mouse T cells homozygous for a *Carmil2*QE
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Effects of the CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> mutation on physiological Jurkat T cell activation. (A) WT, CARMIL2<sup>OST</sup>, and CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD3 and CD28 (shaded histograms). Dashed line curves correspond to isotype-matched control antibodies (negative controls), and data are representative of two independent experiments. (B) WT, CARMIL2<sup>OST</sup>, and CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat T cells were left untreated (–) or stimulated (+) with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 for 2 and 5 min at 37°C. Immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of TL of the specified cells probed with anti-CARMIL2, anti-CARD11, and an anti-ZAP70 loading control. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Left margin, molecular size in kilodaltons. (C) Quantitation of the immunoblot analysis shown in B. Bars represent normalized CARMIL2-ZAP-70 and CARD11-ZAP70 ratios (see Materials and methods).</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

Data in C and E are presented as the mean ± SE. (D) WT, *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup>, and *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat T cells were activated as in B, and immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of lysates from the specified cells subjected to AP on Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads, followed by elution of proteins with D-biotin, and probed with anti-CARMIL2 or anti-CARD11. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Left margin, molecular size in kilodaltons. (E) Quantitation of the immunoblot analysis shown in D. Bars represent normalized CARD11-CARMIL2 ratios. (F) *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup> and *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat T cells were left untreated (-) or stimulated with anti-CD3 (+) in the presence (+) or absence (-) of anti-CD28 for 2 min at 37°C. Immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of lysates from the specified cells subjected to AP on Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads, followed by elution of proteins with D-biotin, and probed with anti-CARMIL2 or anti-CARD11. Data are representative of two independent experiments. Left margin, molecular size in kilodaltons. (G) WT, *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup>, and *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat cells were stimulated with Raji cells that were preincubated in the absence (0) or presence of the specified concentrations of SEE. For each condition, the MFI of CD69⁺ cells was measured by flow cytometry 24 h after stimulation. Numbers on the y axis correspond to the MFI of CD69⁺ cells. Error bars correspond to the mean and SD. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (H) IL-2 production by *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup> and *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> Jurkat T cell clones stimulated with Raji cells alone (0) or in the presence of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 and 1 ng/ml SEE. Analysis of IL-2 production was performed 24 h after stimulation. The expression of IL-2 (pg/ml) is shown using boxplot with the median, boxed interquartile range, and whiskers extending to the most extreme point up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Data are representative of two independent experiments, involving eight independent clones of *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>Q539E-OST</sup> Jurkat cells. Each dot corresponds to a clone of the specified Jurkat T cells. **P** < 0.01, ***P** ≤ 0.001, and ns, nonsignificant; unpaired Student's t test. AP, affinity purification; TL, total lysates; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Source data are available for this figure: SourceData F1.

mutation orthologous to the human *CARMIL2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation contained preformed CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes. Accordingly, two lines of gene-targeted mice expressing either CARMIL2 or *CARMIL2*<sup>QE</sup> molecules tagged with an OST sequence were developed (Fig. S1 and Materials and methods), and their naive T cells expressed the tagged proteins at levels comparable to WT CARMIL2 proteins (Fig. 2 A). CD4⁺ T cells purified from WT, *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup>, and *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> mice were left unstimulated or stimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 for 2 and 5 min, and the *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup> and *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> molecules were subjected to affinity purification and analyzed by immunoblots (Fig. 2, B and C). The association between *CARMIL2*<sup>OST</sup> molecules and CARD11 required TCR-CD28 stimulation, whereas *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> molecules associated with CARD11 prior to TCR-CD28 stimulation. Preformed *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-CARD11</sup> complexes were also specifically present in unstimulated CD8⁺ T cells expressing the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation (Fig. 2, D-F). As observed in Jurkat T cells (Fig. 1, D and E), the levels of preformed *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-OST-CARD11</sup> complexes present in unstimulated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> mice further increased after pervanadate treatment, a surrogate for TCR-CD28 stimulation (Roncagalli et al., 2014), or TCR-CD28 engagement (Fig. 2, B and E).

To determine whether the assembly of the preformed
*CARMIL2*<sup>QE-CARD11</sup> complexes found in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mouse T cells
required the expression of CD28 molecules, *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mice
lacking CD28 molecules (*Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> mice) were generated
and their CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells were purified and left unstimulated or
stimulated with pervanadate. Prior to stimulation, *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-</sup>
*CARD11* complexes were also found in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> CD4<sup>+</sup>
T cells at levels twofold lower than those present in un-
stimulated *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, and they further increased
after pervanadate stimulation (Fig. 2, H and I). Therefore, CD28
expression is dispensable for the generation of preformed
*CARMIL2*<sup>QE-CARD11</sup> complexes in unstimulated mouse T cells
and for their subsequent increase following TCR activation.

CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> expression does not affect TCR signals

Comparison of *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> mouse T cells after cross-linkage of the TCR-CD3 complex alone showed that the expression of *CARMIL2*<sup>QE</sup> had no detectable effect on the global pattern of TCR-inducible tyrosine-phosphorylated species (Fig. 2 J). Moreover, cross-linking of the TCR-CD3 complex of

*Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> T cells induced similar levels of phosphorylation of the ERK serine/threonine protein kinase and of the LAT and SLP76 (also known as LCP2) adaptors (Fig. 2 K), three hallmarks of TCR signaling pathway activity. Therefore, the expression of *CARMIL2*<sup>QE</sup> molecules modified neither the pattern of global TCR-inducible tyrosine phosphorylation nor TCR-inducible phosphorylation of LAT, SLP76, and ERK, demonstrating that the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation does not affect TCR signals.

T<sub>reg</sub> and invariant NKT cell development differ in their requirement for CARMIL2-dependent signals

To explore whether the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation can substitute for CD28 during T cell development, we generated mice homozygous for the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation and expressing (*Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>) or lacking (*Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>) CD28 molecules, and we compared their thymi with those of age-matched WT-, Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>-, and *CARMIL2*-deficient (*Carmil2*<sup>-/-</sup>) mice. *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> thymi had normal cellularities and frequencies of CD4<sup>-</sup>CD8<sup>-</sup> double-negative, CD4<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> double-positive, and CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> single-positive cells (Fig. 3, A and D). It resulted in percentages (Fig. 3, B and C) and numbers (Fig. 3, E and F) of CD8<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup> TCR<sup>β</sup>+CD69<sup>+/-</sup> mature T cells comparable to those of WT thymi. Considering that thymic T<sub>reg</sub> cell development requires both TCR- and CD28-CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated signals (Carter and Pomerantz, 2022; Liang et al., 2013; Roncagalli et al., 2016; Tai et al., 2005; Vang et al., 2010), we analyzed whether the preformed *CARMIL2*<sup>QE-CARD11</sup> complexes found in naive T cells from *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> mice were capable of replacing the need for CD28 engagement during T<sub>reg</sub> cell development. As expected, thymi from Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>-/-</sup> mice had approximately eightfold lower numbers of T<sub>reg</sub> cells as compared to WT thymi (Fig. 3, G and H). In contrast, the numbers of T<sub>reg</sub> cells in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> thymi were not significantly different from those of WT thymi, demonstrating that *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> molecules can substitute for CD28 during thymic T<sub>reg</sub> cell development. The development of thymic invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells requires TCR engagement and CD28 signals that are delivered independently of CARD11 (Medoff et al., 2009; Williams et al., 2008). Consistent with these results, the lack of CARMIL2 had no deleterious effect on iNKT cell development and the expression of *CARMIL2*<sup>QE</sup>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Preformed CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes are found in unstimulated *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mouse T cells irrespective of CD28 expression. (A) CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells purified from WT, *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup>, and *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> mice were either left untreated (-) or stimulated (+) with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 for 2 and 5 min at 37°C. Equal amounts of TL of the specified mouse CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells were analyzed by immunoblots and probed with anti-CARMIL2, anti-CARD11, and an anti-ZAP70 loading control. (B) Immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of lysates from mouse CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells prepared as in A and subjected to AP on Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads, followed by elution of proteins with D-biotin, and probed with anti-CARMIL2 or anti-CARD11. (C) Quantitation of the immunoblot analysis shown in B.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>

Bars represent normalized CARMIL2-ZAP70 and CARD11-ZAP70 ratios. Data are presented as the mean ± SE in C, F, and I. (D) CD8+ T cells purified from OT-I *Carmil2WT* and OT-I *Carmil2QE* mice were either left untreated (-) or stimulated (+) with pervanadate for 2 and 5 min at 37°C. Equal amounts of TL of the specified mouse CD8+ T cells were analyzed by immunoblots and probed with anti-CARMIL2, anti-CARD11, and an anti-ZAP70 loading control. (E) Immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of lysates from mouse CD8+ T cells activated as in D and from which CARMIL2 or CARMIL2QE proteins were IP with an anti-CARMIL2 antibody, and subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-CARMIL2 or CARD11. (F) Quantitation of the immunoblot analysis shown in E. Bars represent normalized CARMIL2-ZAP70 and CARD11-ZAP70 ratios. (G) CD4+ T cells purified from WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice were either left untreated (-) for 2 min at 37°C or stimulated (+) with pervanadate for 2 min at 37°C. Equal amounts of TL of the specified mouse CD4+ T cells were analyzed by immunoblots and probed with anti-CARMIL2, anti-CARD11, and an anti-ZAP70 loading control. (H) Immunoblot analysis of equal amounts of lysates from mouse CD4+ T cells prepared as in G and from which CARMIL2 or CARMIL2QE proteins were IP with an anti-CARMIL2 antibody, and subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-CARMIL2 or CARD11. (I) Quantitation of the immunoblot analysis shown in H. Bars represent normalized CARD11-CARMIL2 units. (J) CD4+ T cells from WT, *Carmil2OST*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice were left untreated (-) or stimulated with either of the anti-CD3 antibodies 2C11 and 17A2 (+) in the presence (+) or absence (-) of the anti-CD28 antibodies MAB4832 for 2 min prior to isolation of whole-cell lysates. Equivalent amounts of lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblot with an antibody specific for pTyr. Inducible phosphorylation of SLP76 pTyr128 (pSLP76), LAT pTyr171 (pLAT), and ERK1/2 pThr202/Tyr204 (pERK1/2) was also assessed by immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies. In A, B, D, E, G, H, and J, molecular weights in kilodaltons are shown in the left margin. Prior to biochemical analysis, comparable levels of TCRβ, CD3, and CD28 were found at the surface of T cells from WT, *Carmil2OST*, *Carmil2QE-OST*, OT-I *Carmil2*, OT-I *Carmil2QE* and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice (Fig. S2 A). Data in A–J are representative of two independent experiments. AP, affinity purification; TL, total lysates; IP, immunoprecipitated; pTyr, phosphotyrosine. Source data are available for this figure: SourceData F2.

molecules in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* thymi failed to restore iNKT cell development (Fig. 3, I and J). Therefore, both thymic $T_{reg}$ and iNKT cells develop in a CD28-dependent manner but differed in their requirement for CARMIL2-CARD11 signals.

Considering that CD28 engagement activates multiple signaling branches (see Discussion), our analysis of $T_{reg}$ and iNKT cell development suggested that whenever the CD28 signals required for a given developmental or functional outcome can be replaced by those triggered by the ready-made CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes found in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice, it can be inferred that the considered CD28-mediated outcome is physiologically driven by the sole CARMIL2-CARD11 signaling branch. Accordingly, we compared next the phenotype of WT, *Cd28⁻/⁻*, *Carmil2⁻/⁻*, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice for each of the developmental and functional traits known to require CD28 costimulation. As described below, it allowed to disentangle such traits into those for which CARMIL2-CARD11-driven CD28 signals are (1) necessary and sufficient, (2) necessary but not sufficient, or (3) dispensable (Table S1), providing a unique opportunity to determine the relative importance of CARMIL2-CARD11-driven signals among those triggered by CD28 under physiological in vivo conditions.

### Peripheral T cells in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice

*Carmil2QE* and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* lymph nodes (LN) had normal cellularities and frequencies of CD4⁺ conventional T ($T_{conv}$) cells and CD8⁺ T cells that expressed normal levels of TCRβ and CD5 (Fig. 4, A–D). *Carmil2QE* and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* LN primarily differed from WT LN by the presence of up to fourfold increased numbers of effector-memory CD4⁺ T (Fig. 4, E and F). Central and effector-memory CD8⁺ T cell numbers were also two and fourfold increased, respectively, in *Carmil2QE* and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* LN as compared to WT LN (Fig. 4, E and F). Immature mouse NK cells co-express CD28 and CARMIL2 (Roncagalli et al., 2016), and CD28 contributes to their optimal proliferation in response to IL-2 (Hunter et al., 1997; Nandi et al., 1994). The spleen of *Cd28⁻/⁻* and *Carmil2⁻/⁻* mice contained 1.5-fold reduced numbers of the NK cell as compared to the WT spleen, whereas the *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* spleen expressed normal NK cell numbers (Fig. 4 G). Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-

mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient for proper NK cell homeostasis.

Consistent with the diminished numbers of $T_{reg}$ cells developing in *Cd28⁻/⁻* and *Carmil2⁻/⁻* thymi, the spleen and LN of *Cd28⁻/⁻* and *Carmil2⁻/⁻* mice contained fourfold reduced numbers of $T_{reg}$ cells as compared to their WT counterparts (Fig. 5, A and B). Considering that the selective ablation of CD28 on peripheral $T_{reg}$ cells diminished both their survival and optimal maturation into effector $T_{reg}$ cells (Zhang et al., 2015), we analyzed the $T_{reg}$ cells that develop normally in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* thymi and seed the LN and spleen and found that their numbers were threefold increased as compared to their WT counterpart (Fig. 5, A and B). They had, however, a twofold reduced suppressive activity as compared to those of WT and *Carmil2QE* mice (Fig. 5 C). Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient for the survival of peripheral $T_{reg}$ cell but insufficient to endow them with optimal suppressive activity.

### CARMIL2QE expression enhances suboptimal TCR signals in the absence of CD28

Stimulation of WT, *Cd28⁻/⁻*, and *Carmil2⁻/⁻* naive T cells with suboptimal concentrations of anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of a fixed concentration of anti-CD28 showed that the lack of CARMIL2 molecules prevented CD28 from enhancing suboptimal TCR signals as the lack of CD28 did (Liang et al., 2013). Using the same assay, naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells isolated from *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* mice and stimulated with anti-CD3 alone proliferated and produced IL-2 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) at levels comparable to WT T cells stimulated with both anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 (Fig. 6, A–C). Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient to enhance the suboptimal signals resulting from low TCR occupancy and it led to normal levels of T cell proliferation and cytokine production.

### CARMIL2QE expression enhances activation marker induction on naive T cells in the absence of CD28

Upon TCR-CD28 engagement, CD28 signals enhance the expression of several receptors at the surface of naive T cells including the ICOS costimulatory receptor (also known as CD278)
<figure><img src="image_26.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** **Effect of the Carmil2QE mutation on thymic development including Treg cells and iNKT cells.** (A) WT, Cd28⁻/⁻, Carmil2⁻/⁻, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ thymi were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD4 and CD8. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD4⁺CD8⁻ double-negative, CD4⁺CD8⁺ double-positive, and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ SP cells. (B) Analysis of lineage⁻ (CD25⁻, MHCII⁻, CD11b⁻, CD161⁻) thymocytes from the specified thymi using TCRβ-CD69 dot plots. They permit to identify TCRβ⁺CD69⁺ cells that went through TCR-mediated positive and negative selection (Ashby and Hogquist, 2024). Note that TCRβ⁺CD69⁻ cells were also included in the specified TCRβ⁺CD69⁻/⁺ gate since they correspond to the most mature SP cells (Hogquist et al., 2015). (C) Analysis of CD4 and CD8 expression on gated TCRβ⁺CD69⁺/⁻ cells showed that they include both DP and SP cells and permit to define CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ mature SP cells. (D) Numbers of total cells in thymi isolated from mice of the specified genotypes (see key). (E) Numbers of total TCRβ⁺CD69⁺/⁻ cells in thymi isolated from mice of the specified genotypes (see key in D). (F) Numbers of CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ TCRβ⁺CD69⁺/⁻ mature T cells in thymi isolated from mice of the specified genotypes (see key in D). (G) Total CD4⁺ SP cells from WT thymus were analyzed by flow cytometry using FOXP3 and CD25 expression and the percentage of FOXP3⁺CD25⁺ Treg cells among total CD4⁺ SP cells defined using the outlined areas. (H) Numbers of FOXP3⁺ Treg cells found in thymi isolated from mice of the specified genotypes (gating strategy as in G). The difference in FOXP3⁺ Treg cell numbers between Carmil2QE and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ thymi is not significant. (I) WT thymic iNKT cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using TCRβ expression and binding of α-galactosylceramide-complexed CD1d tetramers</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>

(CD11d tet), and their percentage among total thymocytes defined using the outlined area. (J) Numbers of iNKT cells gated as in I in thymi isolated from mice of the specified genotypes. Data in A–J were pooled from four experiments with a total of eight mice per group. The data in D–F, H, and J are shown as box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA applying the Holm–Sidák multiple comparison toward the WT group. Only significant values with $P \le 0.05$ are shown. \*P < 0.05, \*\*P < 0.01, \*\*\*P < 0.001. DP, double positive; SP, single positive.

and transporters that carry iron (CD71) or amino acids (CD98) into T cells. Likewise, coinhibitory molecules such as BTLA (CD272) and PD-1 (CD279) are also transiently induced to prevent excessive T cell responses. The respective expression levels of such molecules were then measured on naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells isolated from WT, Cd28⁻/⁻, Carmil2⁻/⁻, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice prior to and following anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 cross-linkage for 48 h (Fig. 6 D). CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from Cd28⁻/⁻ and Carmil2⁻/⁻ mice expressed reduced levels of ICOS as compared to WT CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 6 E and Fig. S2 B). In contrast, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice expressed ICOS at levels comparable to WT T cells. A similar pattern of responses was observed for CD71 and CD98, whereas induction of BTLA and PD-1 was found less dependent on CD28 signals. Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient to trigger the expression of normal levels of ICOS, CD71, and CD98 at the surface of naive Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ T cells following TCR stimulation.

### CARMIL2QE expression renders OT-I T cell activation independent of CD28 engagement

To assess whether CARMIL2QE molecules can substitute for CD28 engagement during T cell responses induced by antigen-laden APC, mice expressing the OT-I TCR specific for the N4 ovalbumin peptide (OVA257-264; Barnden et al., 1998) were backcrossed onto mice expressing CARMIL2QE molecules (OT-I Carmil2QE mice). OT-I Carmil2QE T cells developed similar to OT-I cells (Fig. S3). APC isolated from the spleen of CD3ε-deficient mice and expressing (Cd3εΔ5/Δ5 mice) or lacking (Cd3εΔ5/Δ5 Cd80⁻/⁻ Cd86⁻/⁻ mice) CD80 and CD86 molecules were irradiated and pulsed with agonist (N4) or partial agonist (Q4 and T4) OVA peptides and cultured for 48 h with naive CD8⁺ T cells isolated from OT-I and OT-I Carmil2QE mice. The ensuing T cell proliferation and IL-2 and IFN-γ cytokine production were then measured. The expression of CD80-CD86 on APC was essential to maximize WT OT-I T cell proliferation at all tested N4 peptide concentrations (Fig. 7 A). In marked contrast, OT-I Carmil2QE T cells stimulated with N4-pulsed APC lacking CD80-CD86 expression proliferated at levels comparable—or slightly higher at low N4 concentrations—to those observed for WT OT-I T cells stimulated with N4-pulsed CD80-CD86-expressing APC. The ability of the Carmil2QE mutation to replace CD28 costimulation was even more blatant for IL-2 and IFN-γ production in response to the weak Q4 and T4 agonists (Fig. 7, B and C). Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient to maximize the proliferation and cytokine production of naive OT-I Carmil2QE T cells in response to CD80-CD86-deficient APC laden with agonist and weak agonist OVA peptides. Importantly, the Carmil2QE mutation induced no OT-I proliferation or cytokine production in the absence of anti-CD3

cross-linkage (Fig. 6) or of cognate antigen (Fig. 7), demonstrating that its functional manifestations remained dependent on TCR engagement.

### CARMIL2QE expression replaces CD28 during antitumor T cell responses

Considering that CD28 costimulation plays an essential role in the establishment of antitumor T cell responses (Agarwal et al., 2023; Duraiswamy et al., 2021; Kamphorst et al., 2017; Magen et al., 2023), we determined next whether the expression of CARMIL2QE proteins can replace CD28 engagement during responses to solid tumors. Cohorts of WT, Cd28⁻/⁻, Carmil2⁻/⁻, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice were injected subcutaneously with the syngeneic mouse melanoma tumor BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ and monitored for tumor growth (Fig. 8 A). The BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumor is immunogenic in WT mice (Zelenay et al., 2015), and in turn, all the mice belonging to the WT cohort rejected the tumor cells. Analysis of Cd28⁻/⁻ and Carmil2⁻/⁻ mouse cohorts showed that both CD28 and CARMIL2 molecules were essential for antitumor rejection since their absence permitted BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumor growth, whereas Carmil2QE mice rejected the BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumor as efficiently as WT mice. Importantly, the expression of CARMIL2QE molecules in Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice was capable of substituting for CD28 engagement and led to complete tumor rejection. Comparison of the immune cells infiltrating BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumors of WT, Cd28⁻/⁻, Carmil2⁻/⁻, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice 11 days after inoculation showed that BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumors from Cd28⁻/⁻ and Carmil2⁻/⁻ mice contained reduced percentages of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, Treg cells, and NK cells as compared to tumors from WT mice (Fig. 8 B). In contrast, the expression of CARMIL2QE molecules in Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice resulted in a constellation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the composition and size of which were similar to those of the tumors implanted on WT mice. Therefore, CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient to eradicate the BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ melanoma tumor implanted in Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice.

The Treg cells present in Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice had a twofold decreased suppressive activity as compared to their WT counterpart (Fig. 5 C), and it might have also contributed to the capacity of Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice to eradicate BRAFV600EPtgs⁻/⁻ tumors. Therefore, to evaluate whether the expression of the Carmil2QE mutation in and only in CD8⁺ T cells sufficed to mount protective anticancer responses, we analyzed the growth of the syngeneic MC38-OVA colon adenocarcinoma tumor transplanted subcutaneously into WT mice with or without adoptive transfer of OT-I or OT-I Carmil2QE naive T cells. Considering that MC38-OVA is sensitive to the PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, cohorts of tumor-bearing mice were also injected with anti-
<figure><img src="image_29.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /><figcaption>Figure 4. **Effect of the Carmil2QE mutation on peripheral T cell homeostasis.** (A) Total T cells from LN of WT, Cd28⁻/-, Carmil2⁻/-, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of TCRβ and CD5. Numbers indicate the percentage of cells in the specified quadrants. (B) TCRβ⁺ cells from LN of the specified mice (gated as in A) were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD4 and CD8. Numbers indicate the percentage of cells in the CD4⁺CD8⁻ and CD8⁺CD4⁻ quadrants. (C) Numbers of TCRβ⁺CD4⁺ and TCRβ⁺CD8⁺ T cells in LN of mice of the specified genotypes (see key). (D) MFI of CD5 and TCRβ expression on CD4⁺T<sub>conv</sub> and CD8⁺T cells isolated from the LN of the specified mice (see key in C). (E) CD4⁺T<sub>conv</sub> (CD4⁺conv) cells and CD8⁺T cells from LN of WT, Cd28⁻/⁻, Carmil2⁻/⁻, Carmil2QE, and Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD44 and CD62L. It allows to segregate CD4⁺T cells into naive (CD44<sup>lo</sup>CD62L<sup>hi</sup>) and effector-memory (CD44<sup>hi</sup>CD62L<sup>lo</sup>) cells, and CD8⁺T cells into</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_31.png" /></figure>

naive (CD44lo/CD62Lhi) and antigen-experienced CD44hi, which comprise central memory (CD62Lhi) and effector-memory (CD62Llo) CD8+ T cells. Numbers indicate the percentage of cells in the specified quadrants. (F) Numbers of central memory (cm) and of effector-memory (em) CD8+ and CD4+ T<sub>conv</sub> cells in the LN of the specified mouse (see key). (G) Numbers of CD161+ NK cells in the spleen of the specified mouse (see key in F). Data in A–G were pooled from four experiments with a total of eight mice per group. Data in C, E, and F were analyzed by one- or two-way ANOVA applying the Holm–Sidàk multiple comparison toward the WT group. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown in black, and values comparing *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* and *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>* mice are shown in red.
\*P < 0.05, \*\*P < 0.01, \*\*\*P < 0.001. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

PD-1 or with isotype control antibodies to serve as positive and negative controls, respectively (Fig. 8, C and D). In contrast to OT-I naive T cells, OT-I *Carmil2QE* naive T cells rejected MC38-OVA tumors and the levels of rejection achieved were similar to those observed in tumor-bearing WT mice treated with anti-PD-1. Comparison of the immune cells infiltrating MC38-OVA tumors 11 days after inoculation showed that the MC38-OVA tumors from mice that have received OT-I *Carmil2QE* T cells contained increased numbers of OT-I *Carmil2QE* T cells and reduced numbers of host T<sub>reg</sub> cells and NK cells as compared to MC38-OVA tumors isolated from mice that have received WT OT-I T cells (Fig. 8 E). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the expression of the *Carmil2QE* mutation in and only in cancer-specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells sufficed to trigger their intratumoral expansion, resulting in protective T cell-mediated anticancer immunity without the need for anti-PD-1 therapy.

## Composition and dynamics of the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> interactomes

Upon TCR-CD28 stimulation, several proteins interact with CARMIL2 in addition to CARD11 to form a multiprotein complex denoted as the CARMIL2 interactome or signalosome (Roncagalli et al., 2016). To help rationalizing the unexpectedly broad in vivo functional consequences of the *Carmil2QE* mutation (summarized in Fig. S4), we analyzed whether the *Carmil2QE* mutation affected other CARMIL2-interacting partners beyond CARD11. Using affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS; Voisinne et al., 2019), we compared the composition of the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> interactomes of mouse CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells isolated from *Carmil2OST* and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice prior to and following T cell activation (Table S2 and Data S1). Both interactomes contained CD28, CARD11, and PKC-θ (coded by the *Prkcq* gene), demonstrating that CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules remained capable of complexing CD28 to both CARD11 and PKC-θ (Liang

<figure><img src="image_32.png" /></figure>

**Figure 5.** **Effect of the *Carmil2QE* mutation on peripheral T<sub>reg</sub> cell homeostasis and suppressive function.** (A) Total CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells from LN of the specified mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD25 and FOXP3. The FOXP3<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>lo</sup> to high gate corresponds to T<sub>reg</sub> cells, and their percentages are shown. (B) Numbers of T<sub>reg</sub> cells in the spleen and LN of the specified mouse (see key). Data were pooled from four experiments with a total of 14 mice per group. Data are shown as box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers. (C) Sorted T<sub>reg</sub> cells from WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>* spleens were cultured at the indicated ratio with CTV-labeled CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>-</sup> T<sub>conv</sub> cells from WT mice in the presence of anti-CD3-CD28-coated beads, and the percentage of WT CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>-</sup> T<sub>conv</sub> cells that have divided was evaluated after 72 h of culture (see Materials and methods). Data were pooled from four experiments with a total of six mice per group. Percent suppression was calculated using the following formula: (proliferation of T<sub>conv</sub> cells alone – proliferation of T<sub>conv</sub> cells treated with T<sub>reg</sub> cells) / (proliferation of T<sub>conv</sub> cells alone) × 100. Mean value ± SEM are represented. Data in B and C were analyzed by one- or two-way ANOVA applying the Holm–Sidàk multiple comparison toward the WT group. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown in black. \*P < 0.05, \*\*P < 0.01.
<figure><img src="image_33.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_34.png" /><figcaption>Figure 6. CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent signals maximize TCR-induced proliferation, cytokine production, and expression of activation markers. (A) Naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells purified from the spleen and LN of WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻* mice were activated in vitro with the specified concentrations of plate-bound anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of a fixed concentration (1 µg/ml) of soluble anti-CD28. CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell proliferation was measured by luminescence after 48 h. Stimulation of *Carmil2QE* CD8⁺ T cells with anti-CD3 resulted in twofold increased proliferation as compared to anti-CD3-stimulated *Carmil2QE Cd28⁻/⁻* CD8⁺ T cells, the reason for which remains to be elucidated. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA applying the Holm-Sidàk multiple comparison toward the specified groups. \*P < 0.05, \*\*P < 0.01, \*\*\*P < 0.001. (B) Naive CD4⁺ T cells from the specified mice (see key in C) were activated as in A with 3 µg/ml of anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of 1 µg/ml anti-CD28 and the content of IL-2 present in the supernatant of 40-h-long coculture assessed. Also shown is the IL-2 produced upon stimulation with PMA and ionomycin. (C) Naive CD8⁺ T cells from the specified mice were activated as in A with 3 µg/ml of anti-CD3 in the presence or absence of 1 µg/ml anti-CD28 and the content of IFN-γ present in the supernatant of 40-h-long coculture assessed (see key). Data in A–C were pooled from two experiments out of four, each with a total of four mice per group. Mean value ± SEM are represented; ND indicates nondetectable IL-2 level. Data in B and C were analyzed by one-way ANOVA applying the Holm-Sidàk multiple comparison toward the specified groups. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown. \*\*P < 0.01, \*\*\*P < 0.001. (D) Naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells purified from the spleen and LN of the specified mice (see key) were activated in vitro using anti-CD3 (3 µg/ml) plus anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml) cross-linkage, and the levels of CD278 (ICOS), CD71, CD91, CD272 (BTLA), and CD279 (PD-1) were determined by flow cytometry. The ratio of the MFI at t₄₈h to the MFI at t₀h is shown for each of the analyzed molecules. Data in D are shown as box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers, and pooled from two experiments, each with a total of six mice</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_35.png" /></figure>

per group. Data in D were analyzed by two-way ANOVA applying the Holm-Sidàk multiple comparison toward the specified groups. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown. \*P < 0.05, \*\*P < 0.01, \*\*\*P < 0.001, \*\*\*\*P < 0.0001. Histograms corresponding to the levels of CD278 (ICOS), CD71, CD91, CD272 (BTLA), and CD279 (PD-1) on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from WT, *Carmil2OST*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice prior to and after 48 h of activation are shown in Fig. S2 B. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

et al., 2013; Roncagalli et al., 2016). CAPZA2 and CAPZB, which correspond to the α- and β-subunits of actin capping protein and constitutively bind to CARMIL2 (Stark et al., 2017), were also found in both interactomes. Likewise, both interactomes contained the isoform alpha of casein kinase 1 (CK1-α coded by the Csnklα1 gene), the serine/threonine protein kinase MAP4K1 (also known as HPK1), the calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta (CAMK2D), and the deubiquitinase ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 9X (USP9X), which, together with PKC-θ, collectively regulate the assembly and signaling output of CBM complexes via phosphorylation events (Bidère et al., 2009; Gehring et al., 2019; Kutzner et al., 2022; Park et al., 2013). Several additional interacting proteins, the role of which remains to be elucidated, were also present in both the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE interactomes (Table S2 and Data S1). Therefore, the *Carmil2QE* mutation does not modify the global composition of the WT CARMIL2 interactome.

Considering that immunoblots provide limited quantitative insights, we used quantitative AP-MS to determine the interaction stoichiometries (Schwanhäusser et al., 2011; Voisinne et al., 2019) of CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE with each of their high-confidence interacting partners over 10 min of T cell activation. These interaction stoichiometries showed three distinct temporal profiles. First, both CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE constitutively associated with CAPZA2 and CAPZB with similar high interaction stoichiometry (Fig. 9 A and Data S1). Second, most of the identified interacting partners required prior T cell activation to associate with both CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE molecules and showed similar low interaction stoichiometries (illustrated using CD28 in Fig. 9 A). A third temporal profile of interaction stoichiometries involved CARD11 and differed between the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE interactomes. Consistent with our biochemical analysis (Fig. 2), the interaction between CARMIL2 and CARD11 molecules required prior activation and its stoichiometry peaked 2 min after activation (Fig. 9 A). In contrast, a fraction of CARMIL2QE proteins were already associated with CARD11 proteins in resting T cells and showed an interaction stoichiometry comparable to the maximal CARMIL2-CARD11 interaction stoichiometry observed in WT T cells 2 min after T cell activation (Fig. 9 A). Moreover, after T cell activation, the CARMIL2QE-CARD11 interaction stoichiometry increased sevenfold above that observed in resting CARMIL2QE CD4⁺ T cells. Analysis of the correlations between all the temporal profiles of interaction stoichiometries further revealed that CK1-α was the only interacting partner whose recruitment to CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE correlated with that of CARD11 (Fig. 9 A and Data S2). However, the maximal interaction stoichiometries reached by CARMIL2-CK1-α and CARMIL2QE-CK1-α remained 24- and 80-fold lower than those of CARMIL2-CARD11 and CARMIL2QE-CARD11, respectively (Data S1). The absence of interactor displaying both a temporal profile of interaction stoichiometry and

an interaction stoichiometry similar to those of the CARMIL2-CARD11 and CARMIL2QE-CARD11 interactions strongly suggests that CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE molecules directly interact with CARD11 molecules without the need for a bridging protein. Therefore, once the CARD11- and CK1-α-interacting partners are set aside, the *Carmil2QE* mutation does not change the temporal profile of interaction stoichiometries of the remaining interacting proteins found in the WT CARMIL2 interactome.

## Systems-level view of the molecular consequences of the *Carmil2QE* mutation

To quantitatively compare at a glance the CARMIL2OST and CARMIL2QE interactomes that form in CD4⁺ T cells after 2 min of activation, we combined the interaction stoichiometries of CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE molecules with each of their interacting partners together with their respective cellular abundance (numbers of copies per CD4⁺ T cells; Data S1) (Voisinne et al., 2019). The resulting stoichiometry plots showed that aside of the interactions involving CARD11 and CK1-α, all the other high-confidence protein-protein interactions occupied a similar position on the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE stoichiometry plots at 2 min of activation, confirming the globally conserved composition and dynamics of the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE interactomes (Fig. 9 B). Therefore, both WT and *Carmil2QE*-activated T cells contained identical CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE signalosomes that reached comparable numbers of copies per T cell after 2 min of activation (Fig. 9 B). However, additional CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes specifically formed in *Carmil2QE*-activated T cells independently of the CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2QE signalosomes. Such “stand-alone” CARMIL2QE-CARD11 complexes were 10-fold more numerous than those embedded in the CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2QE signalosomes. They readily formed in the absence of CD28 as documented in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* T cells (Fig. 2), and following phosphorylation by TCR-operated serine/threonine kinases likely constitute the seed of the functional CBM complexes that are capable of replacing the need for CD28 in *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* T cells (Fig. 10).

## Discussion

The CD28 cytoplasmic tail contains tyrosine- and proline-based protein-protein interaction motifs that recruit in a direct or indirect manner a series of proteins that includes, among others, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), the GRB2 adaptor, the LCK and PKC-θ protein kinases (Chen et al., 2022; Skånland and Taskén, 2019; Tian et al., 2015), and CARMIL2 (Liang et al., 2013). Each of these proteins is thought to add by itself or in combination a specific functionality to CD28. Using CD28-deficient mice expressing a *Carmil2QE* mutation, we demonstrated here the unanticipated ability of CARMIL2-
<figure><img src="image_36.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_37.png" /><figcaption>Figure 7. CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent signals replace CD28 engagement during antigen-induced proliferation and cytokine production. (A) Naive CD8+ T cells purified from OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2QE* spleens were stimulated with APC (corresponding to dendritic cells and B cells) isolated from the spleen of T cell-deficient *Cd3e<sup>A5/Δ5</sup>* mice expressing (WT APC) or lacking CD80 and CD86 (*Cd80<sup>-/-</sup> Cd86<sup>-/-</sup>* APC; see key). APC were pulsed for 2 h with a graded concentration of OVA peptides corresponding to agonist (N4) or weak agonist (Q4 and T4) OVA peptides and used to stimulate OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2QE* T cells. T cell proliferation was measured by luminescence after 48 h. (B) Naive OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2QE* T cells were stimulated as in A with the N4, Q4, and T4 peptides (10<sup>-6</sup> M) and the content of IL-2 present in the supernatant of 40-h-long coculture assessed (see key). (C) Naive OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2QE* T cells were stimulated as in A with N4, Q4, and T4 peptides (10<sup>-6</sup> M) and the content of IFN-γ present in the supernatant of 40-h-long coculture assessed (see key in B). Data were pooled from four experiments, each with a total of five mice per group. Mean value ± SEM are represented; ND indicates nondetectable IL-2 and IFN-γ levels. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA applying the Holm–Sidák multiple comparison toward the OT-I group. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.</figcaption></figure>

CARD11-mediated CD28 signals to trigger most known CD28 costimulatory functions in vivo independently of other CD28 signals. Considering the important role attributed to PI3K during CD28 costimulation (Michel et al., 2001), it appears paradoxical

that *Carmil2<sup>Q578E</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>* mice developed robust naive T cell activation and antitumor responses in the absence of CD28-mediated PI3K signals. This might have resulted from the expression on naive *Carmil2QE>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>* T cells of receptors capable
<figure><img src="image_38.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_39.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Expression of CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules substitutes for CD28 engagement during responses to solid tumors. (A) Cohorts of 10-wk-old, WT, Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>, Carmil2<sup>-/-</sup>, Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>, and Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> C57BL/6 mice were injected subcutaneously into the flank with 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells of the BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> Ptgs<sup>-/-</sup> syngeneic melanoma tumor and monitored for tumor growth using tumor size and weight. The mean and SEM are shown for the tumor size values, and the weight panel corresponds to box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with a total of 12-14 mice per group. (B) Immune cell infiltrate analysis of BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> Ptgs1/Ptgs2<sup>-/-</sup> tumors 11 days after implantation in WT, Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>, Carmil2<sup>-/-</sup>, Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>, and Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup>-mice. The percentages of intratumoral TCRβ+ cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, T<sub>reg</sub> cells, and NK cells among CD45+ cells are shown (see key in A). Box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers are shown, and data were pooled from three independent experiments, each with a total of nine mice per group. (C) Tumor growth analysis in WT mice injected subcutaneously with MC38-OVA carcinoma cells and treated with isotype control</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_40.png" /></figure>

antibody, anti-PD-1 antibody, OT-I T cells, or *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E</sup> OT-I T cells 6 days after tumor inoculation. The lines indicate tumor volume over time in individual mice up to the time they had to be euthanized. Tumor growth was monitored three times a week. Data are representative of two independent experiments each involving 10 mice per condition. (D) Results in C were expressed as mean tumor volume (mm<sup>3</sup> ± SEM) and P values shown for day 24. (E) Analysis of immune cell infiltrates of MC38-OVA tumors 11 days after implantation in mice that have been infused with OT-I T cells and *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> OT-I T cells. The percentages of Vα2+Vβ5+ OT-I T cells, Vα2+Vβ5+ *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> OT-I T cells, NK cells, and T<sub>reg</sub> cells among intratumoral CD45+ cells are shown. Data in A, B, D, and E were analyzed by one-way or two-way ANOVA applying the Holm-Sidak multiple comparison toward the specified groups. Only significant values with P ≤ 0.05 are shown. *P* < 0.05, **P** < 0.01, ***P** < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

of replacing CD28-triggered PI3K signals. CD28 and ICOS are evolutionary-related costimulatory receptors that both induce PI3K activation (Fos et al., 2008). In mice carrying a homozygous mutation in the gene coding for ROQUIN-1, ICOS is abnormally expressed on naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and can substitute in part for the missing CD28-mediated PI3K signals (Linterman et al., 2009). In contrast, ICOS was absent on *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> naive T cells and only induced after activation, demonstrating that it cannot provide redundant PI3K signals to *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> naive T cells at the onset of their activation.

Interestingly, the capacity to deliver CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent or CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signals correlated with the use of distinct protein-protein interaction motifs in the CD28 cytoplasmic tail. For instance, the PYAP motif is mandatory for the generation of normal numbers of thymic T<sub>reg</sub> cells, optimal activation of naive T<sub>conv</sub> cells, and IL-2 production (Dodson et al., 2009; Friend et al., 2006; Tai et al., 2005), three outcomes for which we showed that CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated CD28 signals were necessary and sufficient to replace CD28. Conversely, iNKT cell generation correlated with the use of CD28 cytoplasmic motifs distinct from the PYAP motif and required CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signals (Watanabe et al., 2022). These correlations are congruent with the view that CARMIL2 (this study) and the CD28 PYAP motif (Boomer et al., 2014; Chan et al., 2023; Dobbins et al., 2016; Friend et al., 2006; Garçon et al., 2008; Lotze et al., 2024; Pagán et al., 2012; Tai et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2020) are essential to induce most of the CD28-dependent developmental and functional outcomes.

CARMIL2 molecules function as scaffolds permitting the CD28-inducible assembly of CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes. Following phosphorylation by TCR-operated serine/threonine kinases, those complexes constitute the seed permitting the formation of active CBM complexes. After activation of WT T cells, all the CD28-nucleated CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes that assemble are embedded within high-order CARMIL2 interactomes (Fig. 10). In contrast, in activated *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> T cells the majority of CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes assemble independently of CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> signalosomes. Moreover, such stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes are the sole to form in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> T cells. Following phosphorylation by TCR-operated serine/threonine kinases, these stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes likely constitute the seed of the active CBM complexes that mediate in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> mice most of the functions attributed to CD28. Therefore, our quantitative interactomics and functional analyses permit to qualify the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation as a genuine gain-of-function mutation due to its ability to induce the assembly of CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes in the absence of

CD28 input. Mechanistically, the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation might cause a conformational change in CARMIL2 proteins similar to the one that likely happens during their physiological interaction with CD28 molecules bound to CD80-CD86 ligands, and which increases their affinity for CARD11. It also explained that the effects of the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation remained dependent on TCR-triggered posttranslational modifications of CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-bound CARD11 molecules (Kutzner et al., 2022). The functional consequence of this selective gain-of-function in CARD11 recruitment in mice is to correct the majority of activation and differentiation defects caused by CD28 deficiency or by the absence of the CD80 and CD86 ligands including T<sub>reg</sub> cell development and tumor eradication. However, a subset of CD28-dependent events, notably invariant NKT cell development in the thymus, are not CARMIL2-dependent and in turn not corrected by the *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> mutation.

In the two-signal model of naive T cell activation, signal 2 is delivered by a triggering module made of CD28 and of its CD80-CD86 ligands and is conveyed via protein-protein interaction motifs that activate either CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent or -independent signaling branches. The CD28 triggering module of naive T cells is negatively controlled by mechanisms, which are T cell-intrinsic and involve PD-1-mediated dephosphorylation of the tyrosine-based CD28 protein-protein interaction motifs (Celis-Gutierrez et al., 2019; Chan et al., 2023; Hui et al., 2017), as well as T cell-extrinsic and rely on CTLA-4-mediated T<sub>reg</sub> cell transendocytosis of CD80 and CD86 at the surface of APC (Ovcinnikovs et al., 2019). As a result, T cell reactivity against self- and foreign peptides is tuned down by both the action PD-1 and CTLA-4 and the dynamic changes in CD80, CD86, and PD-L1 expression occurring on APC during their tolerogenic or immunogenic maturation (Ardouin et al., 2016; Brown and Rudensky, 2023). Under physiological conditions, these negative regulatory mechanisms permit to eliminate disease-causing pathogens without damaging body tissues and tumors have exploited them for immune escape (Agarwal et al., 2023; Duraiswamy et al., 2021; Magen et al., 2023). We showed here that the ready-made, stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes found in naive *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> T cells replaced the need for a CD28 triggering module. It coincidentally allowed *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> T cells to escape the inhibitory effects resulting from both PD-1 engagement and T<sub>reg</sub> cell-mediated CD80-CD86 transendocytosis, and likely contributed to the unique ability of *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> OT-I T cells to achieve complete rejection of MC38-OVA tumors in the absence of anti-PD-1 treatment.

The separate positive signaling inputs provided by the TCR and CD28 converge on the CARD11 molecule (Fig. 10). Therefore, CARD11 functions as a coincidence detector that informs T cells
<figure><img src="image_41.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_42.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_43.png" /><figcaption>Figure 9. **Composition, dynamics, and stoichiometry of the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> interactomes of primary mouse CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells.** (A) Plots showing the interaction stoichiometry (in log<sub>10</sub> scale) of CARMIL2<sup>OST</sup> and CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup> molecules with the CAPZB-, CD28-, CARD11-, and CK1-α-interacting proteins in CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells before (NS = not stimulated) and after 2, 5, and 10 min of activation via pervanadate treatment. The CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup>-CK1-α bait-prey interaction was the sole to show a temporal pattern of interaction stoichiometry similar to that of CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup>-CARD11. Data are representative of three independent experiments each involving three replicates (mean ± SEM; n = 9 for each time point). (B) Stoichiometry plots of the CARMIL2<sup>OST</sup> and CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup> interactome in CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells prior to activation (NS) and after 2 min of activation (see Data S1). The CARMIL2<sup>OST</sup> (yellow dots) and CARMIL2<sup>QE-OST</sup> (orange dots) proteins (corresponding to the two "baits"), and the CD28 (green dots)-, CARD11 (pink dots)-, PKC-θ (purple dots)-, and CK1-α (blue dots)-interacting proteins (corresponding to select high-confidence "preys") are highlighted, whereas the remaining high-confidence preys are shown as gray dots. For each of the bait-prey interactions, the ratio of prey to bait cellular abundance (abundance ratio in the log<sub>10</sub> scale) was plotted as a function of the interaction stoichiometry</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_44.png" /></figure>

of the considered bait–prey interaction (interaction stoichiometry in the log₁₀ scale). As already noted in the case of the TCR signaling network (Voisinne et al., 2019), substoichiometric bait–prey interactions play a central role in the organization of the CARMIL2OST and CARMIL2QE-OST interactome. The two exceptions corresponded to the almost stoichiometric bait–prey interactions involving CARMIL2OST and CARMIL2QE-OST with CAPZB and CAPZA2 and to the maximal interaction stoichiometry reached after 2 min of activation by the CARMIL2QE-OST-CARD11 bait–prey interaction, a condition in which 12% of the available CARMIL2QE-OST molecules are complexed to CARD11. The area corresponding to bait–prey interaction involving >10% of the available prey molecules is indicated in light gray and includes CAPZA2 and CAPZB in all the analyzed conditions, and CARD11 in the case of the CARMIL2QE-OST interactome after 2 min of stimulation.

that their TCR interacted with antigen-laden APC that have been subjected to inflammatory cues and express high levels of CD80-CD86, leading to their differentiation into effector T cells. Considering that self-reactive T cells can emerge from the thymus (Yu et al., 2015), the *Carmil2QE* mutation should have freed them from both PD-1- and T<sub>reg</sub> cell-mediated inhibition and lead them to escape peripheral tolerance mechanisms and in turn differentiate into effector T cells capable of triggering autoimmunity. Although up to fourfold increased numbers of central and effector-memory CD4<sup>+</sup> T<sub>conv</sub> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells were found in LN of 10-wk-old *Carmil2QE*<sub>CD28<sup>-/-</sup></sub> mice as compared to age-matched WT mice, cohorts of *Carmil2QE*<sub>CD28<sup>-/-</sup></sub> mice maintained over a period of 50 wk under specific pathogen-free conditions showed no obvious sign of autoimmune pathologies and had weight gain and survival rate comparable to age-matched WT mice. The absence of blatant autoimmunity signs in *Carmil2QE*<sub>CD28<sup>-/-</sup></sub> mice kept under specific pathogen-free conditions suggests that their naive T cells expressing high-affinity self-reactive TCR remain subjected to additional peripheral tolerance mechanisms not relying on PD-1- and transendocytosis-based T<sub>reg</sub> cell-mediated suppressive mechanisms (Brown and Rudensky, 2023; Gronski et al., 2004; Policheni et al., 2022; Wong et al., 2021). Accordingly, *Carmil2QE*<sub>CD28<sup>-/-</sup></sub> self-reactive T cells might further require CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signals and exposure to APC-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines to trigger autoimmune manifestations. Finally, *Carmil2QE*<sub>CD28<sup>-/-</sup></sub> mice maintained over a period of 50 wk developed no malignancy or lymphoproliferative disorder, indicating that the *Carmil2QE* mutation does not constitute by itself a cancer driver mutation and likely manifests its gain-of-function effects only in the context of the additional oncogenic mutations found in T cell lymphoma and leukemia (Park et al., 2017; Uchida et al., 2021).

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that most of the developmental and functional consequences resulting from CD28 costimulation are induced by CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated signals and emphasizes the overarching role played by those signals among those triggered by CD28. It also illustrates the power of quantitative interactomics to disentangle the mechanism of action a given mutation has on a multiprotein signalosome, a possibility used here to demonstrate that the change induced in the sole CARMIL2-CARD11 interaction accounted for the unexpectedly broad in vivo functional effects of the *Carmil2QE* mutation. Finally, our results concur with a recent study (Garcia et al., 2024) to demonstrate that among the mutations occurring in malignant T cells, those, the effects of which remain dependent on antigen-dependent TCR signals, can be harnessed to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic T cells. Along that line, we showed that the unique properties of CARMIL2QE molecules could be exploited to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic T cells

in environment deprived of CD28 ligands and to concomitantly free them from PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition.

## Materials and methods

### Mice

Mice were on a C57BL/6 (B6) background and 8–12 wk old unless specified. They were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at Centre d'Immunophénomique (accreditation B1301407) and Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy (accreditation F13005). OT-I (Hogquist et al., 1994), Cd28<sup>-/-</sup> (Shahinian et al., 1993), Cd80<sup>-/-</sup>-Cd86<sup>-/-</sup> (Borriello et al., 1997), Cd3ε<sup>Δ5/Δ5</sup> and Cd3ε<sup>Δ5/Δ5</sup>Cd80<sup>-/-</sup>-Cd86<sup>-/-</sup> (Malissen et al., 1995) mice have been described. Control mice correspond to mice of the same genetic background raised in the same animal facility.

### Animal experimental guidelines

Mice were handled in accordance with national and European laws for laboratory animal welfare and experimentation (European Economic Community Council Directive 2010/63/EU, September 2010) and protocols approved by the Marseille Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation. The generation of knock-in mouse expressing *Carmil2Q538E* and *Carmil2Q538E-OST* alleles was performed in accordance with Xinxiang Medical University (Xinxiang, China) guidelines for animal care.

### Generation of knock-in mouse expressing a *Carmil2OST* allele

A targeting vector was designed to introduce a nucleotide sequence coding for a Twin-Strep-tag (5'-ASWSHPQFEK-GGGSGGGSGGGSWSPHQFEK-3') and a Gly-Gly-Ala amino acid spacer between the first (ATG) and the second (GCA) codon of the mouse *Carmil2* gene (ENSMUST00000213019.2 *Carmil2-203*). A self-excising ACN cassette was introduced in the intron located between *Carmil2* exons 1 and 2, and a cassette permitting the expression of a diphtheria toxin fragment was abutted to the targeting construct. JM8.F6 B6N ES cells were electroporated with the targeting vector. After selection in G418, ES cell clones were screened for proper homologous recombination by Southern blot and PCR analysis. A probe specific for the neo<sup>r</sup> cassette was further used to ensure that adventitious nonhomologous recombination events had not occurred in the selected clones. Mutant ES cells were injected into FVB blastocysts. Screening for proper autodeletion of the ACN cassette and for the presence of the sequence coding for the Twin-Strep-tag (abreviated as OST) was performed by PCR and sequencing. The resulting mutant mice are denoted as *Carmil2OST* mice and also known as B6-Rltpr<sup>tm3Mal</sup>. Genotyping of the *Carmil2OST* allele was performed by PCR using two pairs of primers. The first pair (sense 5'-CTGGCTTCCTGTGTACGCTC-3' and antisense 5'-ACC
<figure><img src="image_45.png" /></figure>

A

<figure><img src="image_46.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_47.png" /></figure>

B

<figure><img src="image_48.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_49.png" /></figure>

C

<figure><img src="image_50.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_51.png" /></figure>

Figure 10. Model summarizing the mode of action of CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules in T cells expressing or lacking CD28. (A) CARMIL2 molecules function as CD28-inducible scaffolds that recruit the CARD11 adaptor. All the CD28-inducible CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes that form in WT T cells are embedded within CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2 signalosome. Phosphorylation of the CARMIL2-associated CARD11 molecules by TCR-activated protein serine/threonine kinases that include PKC-θ induces the formation of active CBM complexes that trigger downstream signaling events including the activation of the NF-κB transcription factor (see Fig. S4 and Bidère et al., 2009; Gehring et al., 2019; Kutzner et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2013; Park et al., 2013; Roncagalli et al., 2016; Schober et al., 2017). The tyrosine-based protein-protein interaction motifs (red circles) present in the CD28 intracytoplasmic tail are subjected to
<figure><img src="image_52.png" /></figure>

dephosphorylation by the SHP2 protein tyrosine phosphatase associated with the PD-1 coinhibitor (Celis-Gutierrez et al., 2019). The CD80 and CD86 ligands expressed at the surface of APC are also subjected to CTLA-4-mediated $T_{reg}$ cell transendocytosis (not shown). (B) Majority of the CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes found in activated *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup> T cells lie outside of CD28-nucleated, high-order CARMIL2 signalosomes and are denoted as stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes. The activity of these last complexes remains dependent on TCR inputs (blue arrow) and freed from PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. (C) Stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes are the sole to form in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>CD28<sup>-/-</sup> T cells. Following phosphorylation by TCR-operated serine/threonine kinases, they likely constitute the seed of the functional CBM complexes that mediate most of the functions attributed to CD28 in *Carmil2*<sup>QE</sup>CD28<sup>-/-</sup> T cells. The activity of these stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes remains dependent on TCR inputs (blue arrow) and freed from PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. The interaction between CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> and isoform CK1α shows a temporal profile of interaction stoichiometry similar to that of the CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 interaction. Considering that CK1α is essential for CBM assembly and MALT1 phosphorylation (Bidère et al., 2009; Gehring et al., 2019), it suggests that the TCR-triggered activation signals received by the stand-alone CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 complexes are mediated at least by CK1α.

TGGTGATCTCGCCTGTG-3') amplified a 369-bp band in the case of the WT allele, whereas the second pair (sense 5'-AGATCTCGA GCTCGCGAAAG-3' and antisense 5'-ACCTGGTGATCTCGCCTG TG-3') amplified a 233-bp band in the case of the *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup> allele.

### Generation of knock-in mouse expressing a *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E</sup> allele

A homology-directed repair (HDR) template consisting of a single-stranded oligonucleotide (BiOligo Biotechnology Co., Ltd; Table S3) was designed to convert the CAG codon found in exon 20 of the mouse *Carmil2* gene and coding for the glutamine residue present at position 538 of the CARMIL2 protein into a GAG codon coding for a glutamic acid. It was used together with a single guide RNA (sgRNA; Table S4) targeting exon 20 of the *Carmil2* gene. Fertilized eggs from B6 female were microinjected with Cas9 mRNA and the designed sgRNA and HDR template as described previously (Zhang et al., 2022). Tail genomic DNA was isolated from the resulting F0 mice and the region encompassing exon 20 amplified and sequenced. An F0 mouse expressing the intended Q538E mutation was used to establish mice heterozygous and homozygous for the Q538E mutation. Those mice denoted as *Carmil*<sup>Q538E</sup> or *Carmil*<sup>QE</sup> in short are also known as B6-Rltpr<sup>tm4Mal</sup>. *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E</sup> mice were genotyped by sequencing a 509-bp DNA fragment that was amplified using the following pair of PCR primers: sense 5'-GACATGGTGACACTGGTGCT-3' and antisense 5'-GAGCCTTGGCTAGCATCTTG-3'.

### Generation of knock-in mouse expressing a *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E-OST</sup> allele

An HDR template consisting of a single-stranded DNA (BiOligo Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Table S3) was designed to insert a sequence coding for an improved Twin-Strep-tag (5'-SAWSHPQFEKGGGSGGGSGGSAWSHPQFEK-3') and a GSG spacer between the first (ATG) and the second (GCA) codon of the first exon of the *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E</sup> allele. It was used together with two sgRNAs targeting the ATG start codon (Table S4). Fertilized eggs from B6 female mice homozygous for the *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E</sup> allele were microinjected with Cas9 mRNA and the designed sgRNA and HDR template as described above. Tail genomic DNA was isolated from the resulting F0 mice and the region encompassing exon 1 amplified and then sequenced. An F0 mouse expressing the intended Twin-Strep-Tag insertion was used to establish homozygous mutant mice. Those mice denoted as *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E-OST</sup> or *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> in short are also known as B6-Carmil2<sup>tm5Mal</sup>. *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E-OST</sup> mice were genotyped by using the following pair of PCR primers: sense 5'-ATTCGACCATCCTCCCACAAC-3' and antisense 5'-GAGAGGTCTGGTTTGGAGTCAG-3'. They amplified a 413 and 314-bp band in the case of the *Carmil2*<sup>Q538E-OST</sup> and WT *Carmil2* allele, respectively.

### Thymus, LN, and spleen cell preparations

Cells from thymus, spleen, and LN were prepared by mechanical disruption in RPMI medium containing 2% FCS. Red blood cells were lysed using RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience). Single-cell suspensions were filtered through a 100-µm membrane prior to counting.

### Flow cytometry

The following antibodies were used: anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD4 (RMA-5), anti-CD5 (53-7.3), anti-CD8a (53-6.7), anti-CD11b (MI/70), anti-CD24 (MI/69), anti-CD28 (E18), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), anti-IA/IE (M5/114.15.2), anti-TCRβ (H57-597), anti-TCRβα2 (B20.1), anti-TCRVβ5.1/5.2 (MR9-4) all from BD; anti-CD24 (M1/69), anti-CD25 (PC61.5), anti-CD71 (R17217), anti-CD98 (RL388), anti-CD161c (PK136), anti-CD272 (6A6), anti-CD278 (15P9), anti-CD279 (29F.1A12) all from BioLegend; and anti-FOXP3 (FJK-16s) and anti-CD45 (30-F11) from eBioscience. Stained cells were analyzed using BD FACSsymphony A3 Cell Analyzer and BD FACSDiva software. Cell viability was evaluated using DAPI (Life Technologies) or Aqua Dead (Molecular Probes) stains. NKT cells were identified using APC-labeled CD1d tetramers complexed to PBS-57, an analog of α-galactosylceramide, and were provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Tetramer Core Facility. Jurkat T cells were analyzed using anti-CD3 (OKT3), anti-CD28 (CD28.2), and anti-CD69 (FN50), all from BD.

### Mouse T cell proliferation and cytokine production

CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells were purified by immunomagnetic negative selection using CD4 or CD8 EasySep Mouse T Cell Isolation Kit (STEMCELL Technologies) and then stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3 (145-2C11; Exbio) and soluble anti-CD28 (37-51; Exbio) antibodies or with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin. CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega) was used for assessing T cell proliferation. It is based on quantification of the ATP present in the medium and is directly proportional to the number of living cells in the well. At the specified time of culture, 100 µl of CellTiter-Glo reagent (Promega) was added directly to each well and the ATP content measured using a Victor2 luminometer (Wallac; PerkinElmer)
<figure><img src="image_53.png" /></figure>

Life Science). IL-2 and IFN-γ production was measured using BD Cytometric Bead Array.

### Antigen-induced OT-I T cell proliferation and IL-2 production

Naive CD8⁺ T cells were purified from OT-I, OT-I *Carmil2*⁻/⁻, and OT-I *Carmil2*QE mice by immunomagnetic negative selection using EasySep Mouse Naive CD8⁺ T Cell Isolation Kit (STEM-CELL Technologies). Purified T cells were stimulated with irradiated H-2 Kᵇ-positive spleen cells isolated from T cell-deficient Cd3εΔ⁵/Δ⁵ or Cd3εΔ⁵/Δ⁵Cd80⁻/⁻Cd86⁻/⁻ mice and pulsed for 2 h with agonist (N4) and weak agonist (Q4 and T4) OVA peptides. After 48 h of culture, T cell proliferation was assessed with CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega) and IL-2 and IFN-γ production using BD Cytometric Bead Array.

### In vitro suppressive capacity of T<sub>reg</sub> cells

Single-cell suspensions from spleen and LN of WT, *Carmil2*QE, and *Carmil2*QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice were enriched for naive CD4⁺ T cells by negative CD4 isolation (Invitrogen). CD4⁺ CD25⁺ T<sub>reg</sub> cells from WT, *Carmil2*QE, and *Carmil2*QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice and CD4⁺ T<sub>conv</sub> cells from WT mice were sorted using BD FACS Aria III Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences), giving a cell purity >98%. CTV-labeled CD4⁺ CD25⁻ WT responder T cells (5 × 10⁴ cells per well) were cultured in 96-well U-bottom plates with or without sorted T<sub>reg</sub> cells from WT, *Carmil2*QE, and *Carmil2*QE Cd28⁻/⁻ mice at responder-to-T<sub>reg</sub> cell ratios of 1:0, 1: 1, 1:2, 2:1, 4:4, 8:1, and 16:1 in the presence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28-coated beads (Dynabeads Mouse T-Activator CD3/CD28) at a ratio of two cells for one bead. Cells were collected after 72 h of culture, and proliferation of CTV-labeled CD4⁺ T<sub>conv</sub> cells was evaluated by flow cytometry by assessing relative CTV dilution.

### Tumor cells

A cyclooxygenase-deficient (Ptgs1/Ptgs2⁻/⁻) variant of the BRAFV600E mouse melanoma tumor (BRAFV600E Ptgs1/Ptgs2⁻/⁻ [Zelenay et al., 2015]) was provided by R. Marais (Cancer Research Manchester Institute, Manchester, UK) via C. Reis e Sousa (Francis Crick Institute, London, UK). The MC38-OVA mouse colon adenocarcinoma cell line was provided by J.P. Böttcher (Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany) (Lacher et al., 2024).

### Ectopic tumor cell inoculation

BRAFV600EPtgs1/Ptgs2⁻/⁻ and MC38-OVA tumor cells were harvested by trypsinization, and washed three times with PBS, and 1 × 10⁵ (BRAFV600EPtgs1/Ptgs2⁻/⁻) or 5 × 10⁵ (MC38-OVA) cells were injected subcutaneously into the flank of recipient mice in 100 µl of endotoxin-free PBS. The tumor size was quantified as the mean of the longest diameter and its perpendicular. Tumor size volume was calculated by measuring the length and width of a tumor using calipers, and then inputting the values in the equation V = 0.5 × L × W2, where V is the tumor volume, L is the tumor length, and W is the tumor width. Mice were euthanized when they met physical euthanasia criteria as recommended by national

and European laws for laboratory animal welfare and experimentation.

### Adoptive T cell transfer

Naive CD8⁺ T cells were purified from OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2*QE mice as indicated above, and 2 × 10⁶ cells were i.v. injected into B6 mice 6 days after MC38-OVA tumor cell transplantation.

### Anti-PD-1 treatment

MC38-OVA tumor-bearing mice were i.v. injected 6 days after tumor inoculation and then every 3 days with either 200 µg of anti-PD-1 mAb (clone RMP1-14, InVivoPlus anti-mouse PD-1; BioXcell) or 200 µg of an isotype control (InVivoPlus rat IgG2a anti-trinitrophenol; BioXcell).

### Isolation and analysis of myeloid and lymphoid cells from the tumor microenvironment

To isolate cells from tumor mass, tumors were cut into small pieces and transferred to a gentleMACS C tube (Miltenyi Biotec) in 4 ml of RPMI medium supplemented with 5% FCS containing 0.8 mg/ml collagenase 4 (Worthington) and 0.2 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich). The tissue was digested and homogenized using gentleMACS Octo Dissociator and the program suggested by the supplier. The digestion was stopped by the addition of EDTA 0.5 M (5 mM final). Cell suspensions were then filtered through a 100-µm cell strainer prior to flow cytometric analysis.

### Cell lines

The Jurkat human leukemic T cell line and Raji lymphoblastoid B cell line originated from the American Type Culture Collection and were provided by A. Weiss (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA).

### Generation of Jurkat knock-in cells expressing OST-tagged form of CARMIL2, CARMIL2Q539E, and CARMIL2Q539D proteins

A CRISPR-Cas9-based knock-in approach based on a gene trapping strategy permitted to readily introduce biallelic mutations in independent clones of Jurkat T cells (Celis-Gutierrez et al., 2019). We used it to introduce a Twin-Strep-Tag at the C terminus of WT CARMIL2 molecules (CARMIL2OST) and in a second knock-in step to obtain mutant CARMIL2OST molecules that contain the Q539E mutation. Using the CRISPOR algorithm we designed two sgRNA permitting to introduce two double-strand breaks (DSB) at the 3' end of exon 18 of the human CARMIL2 gene. The following pairs of sgRNA-specifying oligonucleotide sequences were synthesized: Pair 1: 5'-CACCGTTGGAAGGAA CTTCAACGTC-3' and 5'-AAACGACGTTGAAGTTCCTTCCAAC-3'; and Pair 2: 5'-CACCGGGTGGGGGCTCACTTCAC-3' and 5'-AAACGTGCAAGTGAGCCCCCACCC-3'. Each pair of oligonucleotides contained CACC and AACC overhangs for cloning into BbsI sites of plasmid pX330 (pSpCas9; plasmid ID 42230; Addgene), and a G-C base pair (italics) was added at the 5' end of the guide sequence for T7 transcription. A 4932-bp-long double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) HDR template denoted Carmil2_exons_19-39_OST_P2A_NeoR was designed and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies as a plasmid vector. It contained (1) a 500-bp-long sequence homologous to the sequence flanking the
<figure><img src="image_54.png" /></figure>

5' end of the first DSB to be introduced in exon 19 (5' homology arm), (2) a 2,617-bp-long cDNA coding for exons 19 to 39 of the human *CARMIL2* gene, (3) an in-frame 90-bp-long OST tag sequence (Junttila et al., 2005) flanked on both sides by a Gly-Ser-Gly spacer, (4) a 57-bp-long sequence coding for the self-cleaving P2A peptide, (4) a Met (start) codon, (5) a translatable loxP511 sequence, (6) a neomycin resistance gene (NeoR)-containing cassette, (7) a stop codon, (8) a loxP511 sequence, (9) a synthetic intron, (10) a polyA sequence, and (11) a 500-bp-long sequence homologous to the sequence flanking the 3' end of the second DSB to be introduced in exon 20 (3' homology arm). To prevent CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage of the edited allele, silent mutation destroying the PAM sequences present in the genomic DNA was introduced into the *Carmil2_exons_19-39_OST_P2A_NeoR* HDR dsDNA template. Jurkat T cells were nucleofected using the Cell Line Nucleofector Kit V program I-010 for Nucleofector II with 2.5 µg of linearized *Carmil2_exons_19-39_OST_P2A_NeoR* HDR dsDNA template, and 5 µg of pX330-sgRNA Pair 1 and 5 µg of pX330-sgRNA Pair 2 plasmids. Cells were allowed to recover for 48 h and then subjected to G418 selection (2 mg/ml). After 72 h of selection, cells were cloned by limiting dilution and each resulting clone was screened for proper gene editing using PCR and genomic DNA sequencing. Proper knock-in of the *Carmil2_exons_19-39_OST_P2A_NeoR* cassette allows the expression of the NeoR gene under the control of the *Carmil2* gene. Owing to the high cutting efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9, most of the Jurkat T cell clones that grow following selection in the presence of 2 mg/ml neomycin had the intended biallelic insertion.

## Jurkat T cell stimulation

WT, *CARMIL2OST*, and *CARMIL2QE-OST* Jurkat T cells ($1 \times 10^5$) were stimulated by coculture with Raji cells ($0.5 \times 10^5$) in the presence or absence of the SEE superantigen (Toxin Technology). Following 24 h of stimulation, IL-2 production was measured by ELISA (R&D Systems), and CD69 induction was measured by flow cytometry using anti-CD69 (FN50 from BioLegend).

## Biochemical analysis of Jurkat T cells

WT, *CARMIL2OST*, and *CARMIL2QE-OST* Jurkat T cells ($60-80 \times 10^6$) were incubated with a mouse IgG2a anti-CD3 (5 µg/ml; HIT3a from BD Bioscience) and a mouse IgG1 anti-CD28 (5 µg/ml; CD28.2; BioLegend) for 15 min on ice, followed by one round of washing at 4°C. Cells were then incubated at 37°C for 5 min and either left untreated or stimulated by cross-linking the bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies with purified rat anti-mouse IgG1 (2.5 µg/ml; #553440 from BD Bioscience) and purified rat anti-mouse IgG2a (2.5 µg/ml; #553387; BD Bioscience) for 2 and 5 min at 37°C. The stimulation was stopped by the addition of twice-concentrated lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 4 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2% NP-40) supplemented with protease inhibitors. After 10 min of incubation on ice, cell lysates were centrifuged at 21,000 g for 8 min at 4°C. Postnuclear cell lysates were either directly used for immunoblot analysis or affinity-purified on Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads. The following antibodies were used for immunoblot analysis: anti-ZAP70 (2705;

Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CARMIL2 (EM-53; Exbio Praha), and anti-CARD11 (ID1; Cell Signaling Technology). Unprocessed western blots corresponding to the biochemical analysis of Jurkat cells are shown in SourceData F1.

## Biochemical analysis of mouse CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells

WT, *Carmil2OST*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* CD4⁺ mouse T cells were incubated with 0.2 µg per $10^6$ cells of rat anti-CD3 (17A2 from eBioscience) or hamster anti-CD3 (145-2C11; Exbio) in the presence or absence of 0.2 µg per $10^6$ cells of rat anti-CD28 (MAB4832 from R&D Systems) for 15 min on ice, followed by one round of washing at 4°C. Cells were then incubated at 37°C for 5 min and left unstimulated or stimulated by cross-linking the bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies with 0.4 µg per $10^6$ cells of purified F(ab')₂ goat anti-rat IgG antibody (112-006-062; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 2 and 5 min at 37°C. The stimulation was stopped by the addition of twice-concentrated lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 nM NaF, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2% NP-40) supplemented with protease inhibitors. After 10 min of incubation on ice, cell lysates were centrifuged at 21,000 g for 8 min at 4°C. Equal amounts of proteins from postnuclear cell lysates were either directly used for whole-cell lysate immunoblot analysis or affinity-purified on Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads. The following antibodies were used for immunoblot analysis: anti-ZAP-70 (2705 from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CARMIL2 (EM-53 from Exbio Praha), and anti-CARD11 (ID12 from Cell Signaling Technology). For pervanadate stimulation, a pervanadate stock solution was made by mixing 7.6 vol of water with 1.9 vol of hydrogen peroxide (10 mM final concentration) and with 0.5 vol of sodium orthovanadate (100 µM final concentration), followed by incubation for 15 min at 20°C before addition to T cells. Short-term expanded WT, OTI *Carmil2WT*, and OTI *Carmil2QE* CD8⁺ T cells and WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QEcd28⁻/⁻* CD4⁺ T cells were incubated with pervanadate for 2 and 5 min, and stimulation was stopped by the addition of twice-concentrated lysis buffer (see above). Cell lysates were prepared as described above for CD4⁺ mouse T cells. *CARMIL2* and *CARMIL2QE* proteins were immunoprecipitated with a mouse anti-CARMIL2 (EM-53), separated by electrophoresis through 8% SDS-acrylamide gels. Equal amounts of proteins from postnuclear cell lysates were either directly used for whole-cell lysate immunoblot analysis or immunoprecipitated prior to immunoblot analysis. The following antibodies were used for immunoblot analysis: mouse anti-CARMIL2 (EM-53), monoclonal rabbit anti-CARD11 (2D11 from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ZAP-70 (2705 from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VAV1 (2505 from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pY28-SLP76 (558367 from BD Biosciences), anti-pERK1-2 (9106 from Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-pY171-LAT (3581S; from Cell Signaling Technology). Unprocessed western blots corresponding to the biochemical analysis of mouse CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells are shown in Source Data F2.

## Immunoblot quantitation

Protein band areas from the immunoblots were defined as region of interest and quantified using ImageJ software (https://imagej.net/ij/). In the case of affinity purification followed by
<figure><img src="image_55.png" /></figure>

immunoblots, the CARD11-CARMIL2 ratio was calculated for each condition and normalized to the highest ratio value to give CARD11-CARMIL2 relative units. In the case of immunoblots of the total cell lysate, an anti-ZAP70 was used as a normalization control. The CARMIL2-ZAP70 and CARD11-ZAP70 ratios were calculated for each condition and normalized to the highest ratio value and then expressed in relative units.

## Stimulation and lysis of short-term expanded mouse CD4⁺ T cells prior to AP-MS analysis

Purified CD4⁺ T cells from *Carmil2*<sup>OST</sup> and *Carmil2*<sup>QE-OST</sup> mice were briefly expanded for 96 h (Voisinne et al., 2019), rested down, and left untreated or treated for 2, 5, and 10 min with pervanadate (see above). Stimulation was stopped by the addition of a twice-concentrated lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 nM NaF, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2% NP-40) supplemented with protease inhibitors. After 10 min of incubation on ice, cell lysates were centrifuged at 21,000 g for 5 min at 4°C and then used for affinity purification.

## Affinity purification of OST-tagged protein complexes

Equal amounts of postnuclear lysates were incubated with Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads (IBA GmbH) for 1.5 h at 4°C on a rotary wheel. Beads were then washed five times with 1 ml of lysis buffer 1× in the absence of detergent and of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Proteins were eluted from the Strep-Tactin Sepharose beads with 2.5 mM D-biotin, a ligand that binds to Strep-Tactin with a higher affinity than the OST sequence does.

## Tandem MS analysis

Following affinity purification, protein samples were air-dried in a SpeedVac concentrator, and reconstituted in 1% sodium deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris, pH 8. Cysteine residues were reduced and alkylated using 10 mM TCEP and 40 mM chloroacetamide for 5 min at 95°C, and samples were then processed for trypsin digestion using the SP3 method (Hughes et al., 2019) on Sera-Mag carboxylate-modified magnetic beads (Cytiva). Resulting tryptic peptides were resuspended in 17 µl of 2% acetonitrile and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid and analyzed by nano-liquid chromatography coupled to tandem MS, using an UltiMate 3000 system (NCS-3500RS Nano/Cap System; Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Orbitrap Q Exactive mass spectrometer (model Q Exactive Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Five microliters of each sample was loaded on a C18 precolumn (300 µm inner diameter × 5 mm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a solvent made of 2% acetonitrile and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid, at a flow rate of 20 µl/min. After 5 min of desalting, the precolumn was switched online with the analytical C18 column (75 µm inner diameter × 50 cm, Acclaim PepMap C18, 2 µM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, or in-house packed with 3 µm Reprosil C18) equilibrated in 95% solvent A (5% acetonitrile, 0.2% formic acid) and 5% solvent B (80% acetonitrile, 0.2% formic acid). Peptides were eluted using a 5-50% gradient of solvent B over 60 min at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent acquisition mode with Xcalibur software. MS survey scans were acquired with a resolution of 70,000 and an

AGC target of 3e6. The 10 most intense ions were selected for fragmentation by high-energy collision-induced dissociation, and the resulting fragments were analyzed at a resolution of 17,500 using an AGC target of 1e5 and a maximum fill time of 50 ms, respectively. Dynamic exclusion was used within 30 s to prevent repetitive selection of the same peptide.

## Protein identification and quantification for interaction proteomics

Raw MS files were processed with MaxQuant software (version 1.5.2.8) for database search with the Andromeda search engine and quantitative analysis. Data were searched against *Mus musculus* entries of the UniProt KB protein database (release UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot+TrEMBL 2017_01, 89297 entries including isoforms), plus the One-Strep-tag peptide sequence, and the set of common contaminants were provided by MaxQuant. Carbamidomethylation of cysteines was set as a fixed modification, whereas oxidation of methionine, protein N-terminal acetylation, and phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine were set as variable modifications. Specificity of trypsin digestion was set for cleavage after K or R, and two missed trypsin cleavage sites were allowed. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 20 ppm for the first search and 4.5 ppm for the main Andromeda database search. The mass tolerance in tandem MS mode was set to 0.5 Da. Minimum peptide length was set to 7 amino acids, and minimum number of unique or razor peptides was set to 1 for validation. The I = L option of MaxQuant was enabled to avoid erroneous assignment of undistinguishable peptides belonging to very homologous proteins. Andromeda results were validated by the target decoy approach using a reverse database, with a false discovery rate set at 1% at both PSM (peptide sequence match) and protein levels. For label-free relative quantification of the samples, the match between runs option of MaxQuant was enabled with a match time window of 1 min, to allow cross-assignment of MS features detected in the different runs, after alignment of the runs with a time window of 20 min. Protein quantification was based on unique and razor peptides. The minimum ratio count was set to 1 for label-free quantification (LFQ) calculation, and computation of the iBAQ metric was also enabled.

## Calculation of interaction stoichiometries

For a given condition of stimulation (represented by the time of stimulation t, with t = 0 s corresponding to the nonstimulated condition), the stoichiometry of the interaction between a prey x and a given bait (denoted bait < x) was computed using

$$S_{\text{bait} < x}(t) = \frac{\langle I_{\text{OST},x}(t) \rangle / \langle I_{\text{OST},\text{bait}}(t) \rangle * N_{\text{pep},\text{bait}}}{N_{\text{pep},x}}$$

$\langle I_{\text{OST},x} \rangle$ corresponds to the normalized intensity of protein x in OST-tagged samples and stimulation time t averaged (geometric mean) across all biological replicates, and $N_{\text{pep}}$ corresponds to the number of tryptic peptides theoretically observables as estimated from iBAQ values. We also computed stoichiometries independently for each biological replicate and used those values to quantify the regulation of bait-prey association following TCR engagement. For a given condition of stimulation, log-transformed stoichiometries were compared with that of the
<figure><img src="image_56.png" /></figure>

nonstimulated condition using a two-tailed Welch *t* test. We selected preys whose interaction stoichiometry changed at least twofold with a *P* value below 0.05 in at least one condition of stimulation as compared to the nonstimulated condition.

**Online supplemental material**

Fig. S1 shows the schematic structure of the CARMIL proteins produced by WT mice and *Carmil2QE*, *Carmil2OST*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* gene-targeted mice. Fig. S2 shows the expression profile of cell surface markers on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells from WT, *Carmil2OST*, *Carmil2QE-OST*, OT-I *Carmil2*, OT-I *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE*Cd28⁻/⁻ mice. Fig. S3 shows that OT-I T cells develop normally in the presence of CARMIL2QE molecules. Fig. S4 shows a model summarizing the CD28-dependent traits induced by the CD28 signaling branches dependent on or independent from CARMIL2-CARD11. Fig. S5 shows that T cells developing in *Carmil2QE* and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice had a similar phenotype. Table S1 shows the criteria used to define whether CARMIL2-CARD11-driven signals are necessary and sufficient to trigger a given CD28-dependent trait. Table S2 shows the list of the proteins interacting with both CARMIL2 and CARMIL2QE molecules in mouse CD4⁺ T cells after 2 min of activation. Table S3 shows the single-strand DNA HDR template sequences used in the present study. Table S4 shows the sgRNA sequences used in the present study. Data S1 is related to Fig. 9 and shows the interactome dataset of CD4⁺ T cells isolated from *Carmil2* and *Carmil2QE* mice. To facilitate their comparison, the data corresponding to *Carmil2* (WT) and *Carmil2QE* (QE) CD4⁺ T cells are shown side by side. Data S2 is related to Fig. 9 and shows the correlation analysis permitting to define the CARMIL2 interactors that show a temporal profile of interaction stoichiometry similar to that of the CARMIL2-CARD11 and CARMIL2QE-CARD11 interactions. SourceData F1 and SourceData F2 show the unprocessed western blots corresponding to Figs. 1 and 2.

**Data availability**

The mass spectrometry proteomics data underlying Data S1 and S2 are openly available in the ProteomeXchange Consortium at the PRIDE partner repository (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride) with the dataset identifier PXD055893. All other data are available in the article and its supplementary files.

**Acknowledgments**

We thank R. Levy, V. Béziat, D. Marguet, C. Benoist, S. Henri, H. Luche, and D. Pervizou for discussion and advice; J.P. Böttcher, R. Marais, C. Reis e Sousa, and A. Weiss for cell lines; M. Camus for her help with MS analyses; and the NIH Tetramer Core Facility for reagents.

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no 787300 [BASILIC] to B. Malissen), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-AAP-2018 Super-Basilic 18-CE15-0021-01 to B. Malissen and ANR-AAP-2021 Carmil2 21-CE15-0034-02 to B. Malissen), the National Natural Science

Foundation of China (grant no. 32070898 to Y. Liang, no. 32170879 to L. Zhang, and no. U1904157 to L. Lu), the Zhongyuan Academician Fund from Henan Province (C24185), the National Discipline Innovation and Intelligence Introduction Base 111 Project (D20036), the Investissement d'Avenir program ProFi (French National Infrastructure for Proteomics; ANR-10-INBS-08 to O. Burlet-Schiltz), and PHENOMIN (French National Infrastructure for Mouse Phenogenomics; ANR-10-INBS-07, to B. Malissen), and by fellowships from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32000627 to F. Zhang), DCBIOL (to J. Celis-Gutierrez), PHENOMIN (to L. Gelard and V. Mellado), Aix Marseille Université Master (to S. Panigot), ANR (to C. Vilarnau Wolek), and the MSDAvenir Fund (to D. Mori).

Author contributions: F. Zhang: data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, validation, and visualization. J. Celis-Gutierrez: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, validation, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. L. Zhang: funding acquisition, methodology, and resources. V. Mellado: investigation, methodology, and visualization. L. Gelard: investigation. S. Panigot: investigation, methodology, and visualization. D. Mori: investigation. L. Lu: funding acquisition, methodology, and resources. G. Voisinne: formal analysis, visualization, and writing—original draft. C. Vilarnau-Wolek: investigation, methodology, and visualization. M. Mello: investigation, methodology, and visualization. O. Burlet-Schiltz: investigation and resources. A. Gonzalez de Peredo: investigation, validation, and writing—review and editing. F. Fiore: investigation, methodology, and visualization. R. Roncagalli: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, software, validation, visualization, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. Y. Liang: investigation. M. Malissen: conceptualization, formal analysis, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. B. Malissen: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Disclosures: J. Celis-Gutierrez, R. Roncagalli, M. Malissen, and B. Malissen reported patent no. 23315449.1 (European Patent Office) pending. In addition, B. Malissen reported personal fees from AltruBio and personal fees from Janvier Group Biosciences outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Submitted: 13 February 2025

Revised: 30 March 2025

Accepted: 23 April 2025

**References**

Agarwal, S., M.A. Aznar, A.J. Rech, C.R. Good, S. Kuramitsu, T. Da, M. Gohil, L. Chen, S.A. Hong, P. Ravikumar, et al. 2023. Deletion of the inhibitory co-receptor CTLA-4 enhances and invigorates chimeric antigen receptor T cells. *Immunity*. 56:2388-2407.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2023.09.001

Ardouin, L., H. Luche, R. Chelbi, S. Carpentier, A. Shawket, F. Montanana Sanchis, C. Santa Maria, P. Grenot, Y. Alexandre, C. Grégoire, et al. 2016. Broad and largely concordant molecular changes characterize tolerogenic and immunogenic dendritic cell maturation in thymus and
<figure><img src="image_57.png" /></figure>

periphery. *Immunity*. 45:305–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni-2016.07.019

Ashby, K.M., and K.A. Hogquist. 2024. A guide to thymic selection of T cells. *Nat. Rev. Immunol.* 24:103–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-023-00911-8

Barnden, M.J., J. Allison, W.R. Heath, and F.R. Carbone. 1998. Defective TCR expression in transgenic mice constructed using cDNA-based alpha- and beta-chain genes under the control of heterologous regulatory elements. *Immunol. Cell Biol.* 76:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1711.1998.00709.x

Bidère, N., V.N. Ngo, J. Lee, C. Collins, L. Zheng, F. Wan, R.E. Davis, G. Lenz, D.E. Anderson, D. Arnoult, et al. 2009. Casein kinase Ialpha governs antigen-receptor-induced NF-kappaB activation and human lymphoma cell survival. *Nature*. 458:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07613

Boomer, J.S., C.M. Deppong, D.D. Shah, T.L. Bricker, and J.M. Green. 2014. Cutting edge: A double-mutant knockin of the CD28 YMNM and PYAP motifs reveals a critical role for the YMNM motif in regulation of T cell proliferation and Bcl-xL expression. *J. Immunol.* 192:3465–3469. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1301240

Borriello, F., M.P. Sethna, S.D. Boyd, A.N. Schweitzer, E.A. Tivol, D. Jacoby, T.B. Strom, E.M. Simpson, G.J. Freeman, and A.H. Sharpe. 1997. B7-1 and B7-2 have overlapping, critical roles in immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. *Immunity*. 6:303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80333-7

Brown, C.C., and A.Y. Rudensky. 2023. Spatiotemporal regulation of peripheral T cell tolerance. *Science*. 380:472–478. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg6425

Burke, K.P., A. Chaudhri, G.J. Freeman, and A.H. Sharpe. 2024. The B7:CD28 family and friends: Unraveling coinhibitory interactions. *Immunity*. 57: 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2024.01.013

Carter, N.M., and J.L. Pomerantz. 2022. CARD11 signaling in regulatory T cell development and function. *Adv. Biol. Regul.* 84:100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbior.2022.100890

Celis-Gutierrez, J., P. Blattmann, Y. Zhai, N. Jarmuzynski, K. Ruminski, C. Grégoire, Y. Ounoughene, F. Fiore, R. Aebersold, R. Roncagalli, et al. 2019. Quantitative interactomics in primary T cells provides a rationale for concomitant PD-1 and CTLA-4 coinhibitor blockade in cancer immunotherapy. *Cell Rep.* 27:3315–3330.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.041

Chan, W., Y.M. Cao, X. Zhao, E.C. Schrom, D. Jia, J. Song, L.V. Sibener, S. Dong, R.A. Fernandes, C.J. Bradfield, et al. 2023. TCR ligand potency differentially impacts PD-1 inhibitory effects on diverse signaling pathways. *J. Exp. Med.* 220:e20231242. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20231242

Chen, X., S. Ji, Z. Liu, X. Yuan, C. Xu, R. Qi, A. He, H. Zhao, H. Song, C. Xiao, et al. 2022. Motif-dependent immune co-receptor interactome profiling by photoaffinity chemical proteomics. *Cell Chem. Biol.* 29:1024–1036.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.01.005

Dobbins, J., E. Gagnon, J. Godec, J. Pyrdol, D.A. Vignali, A.H. Sharpe, and K.W. Wucherpfennig. 2016. Binding of the cytoplasmic domain of CD28 to the plasma membrane inhibits Lck recruitment and signaling. *Sci. Signal.* 9: ra75. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aaf0626

Dodson, L.F., J.S. Boomer, C.M. Deppong, D.D. Shah, J. Sim, T.L. Bricker, J.H. Russell, and J.M. Green. 2009. Targeted knock-in mice expressing mutations of CD28 reveal an essential pathway for costimulation. *Mol. Cell. Biol.* 29:3710–3721. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01869-08

Duraiswamy, J., R. Turrini, A. Minasyan, D. Barras, I. Crespo, A.J. Grimm, J. Casado, R. Genolet, F. Benedetti, A. Wicky, et al. 2021. Myeloid antigen-presenting cell niches sustain antitumor T cells and license PD-1 blockade via CD28 costimulation. *Cancer Cell.* 39:1623–1642.e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.10.008

Ferguson, S.E., S. Han, G. Kelsoe, and C.B. Thompson. 1996. CD28 is required for germinal center formation. *J. Immunol.* 156:4576–4581. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.156.12.4576

Fos, C., A. Salles, V. Lang, F. Carrette, S. Audebert, S. Pastor, M. Ghiotto, D. Olive, G. Bismuth, and J.A. Nunès. 2008. ICOS ligation recruits the p50alpha PI3K regulatory subunit to the immunological synapse. *J. Immunol.* 181:1969–1977. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.1969

Friend, L.D., D.D. Shah, C. Deppong, J. Lin, T.L. Bricker, T.I. Juehne, C.M. Rose, and J.M. Green. 2006. A dose-dependent requirement for the proline motif of CD28 in cellular and humoral immunity revealed by a targeted knockin mutant. *J. Exp. Med.* 203:2121–2133. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20052230

Garcia, J., J. Daniels, Y. Lee, I. Zhu, K. Cheng, Q. Liu, D. Goodman, C. Burnett, C. Law, C. Thienpont, et al. 2024. Naturally occurring T cell mutations enhance engineered T cell therapies. *Nature*. 626:626–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07018-7

Garçon, F., D.T. Patton, J.L. Emery, E. Hirsch, R. Rottapel, T. Sasaki, and K. Okkenhaug. 2008. CD28 provides T-cell costimulation and enhances

PI3K activity at the immune synapse independently of its capacity to interact with the p85/p110 heterodimer. *Blood*. 111:1464–1471. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-08-108050

Gehring, T., T. Erdmann, M. Rahm, C. Graß, A. Flatley, T.J. O'Neill, S. Woods, I. Meininger, O. Karayel, K. Kutzner, et al. 2019. MALT1 phosphorylation controls activation of T lymphocytes and survival of ABC-DLBCL tumor cells. *Cell Rep.* 29:873–888.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.040

Gronski, M.A., J.M. Boulter, D. Moskophidis, L.T. Nguyen, K. Holmberg, A.R. Elford, E.K. Deenick, H.O. Kim, J.M. Penninger, B. Odermatt, et al. 2004. TCR affinity and negative regulation limit autoimmunity. *Nat. Med.* 10: 1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1114

Hogquist, K.A., S.C. Jameson, W.R. Heath, J.L. Howard, M.J. Bevan, and F.R. Carbone. 1994. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. *Cell.* 76:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4

Hogquist, K.A., Y. Xing, F.C. Hsu, and V.S. Shapiro. 2015. T cell adolescence: Maturation events beyond positive selection. *J. Immunol.* 195:1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1501050

Hughes, C.S., S. Moggridge, T. Müller, P.H. Sorensen, G.B. Morin, and J. Krijgsveld. 2019. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. *Nat. Protoc.* 14:68–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x

Hui, E., J. Cheung, J. Zhu, X. Su, M.J. Taylor, H.A. Wallweber, D.K. Sasmal, J. Huang, J.M. Kim, I. Mellman, and R.D. Vale. 2017. T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1-mediated inhibition. *Science*. 355:1428–1433. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1292

Hunter, C.A., L. Ellis-Neyer, K.E. Gabriel, M.K. Kennedy, K.H. Grabstein, P.S. Linsley, and J.S. Remington. 1997. The role of the CD28/B7 interaction in the regulation of NK cell responses during infection with Toxoplasma gondii. *J. Immunol.* 158:2285–2293. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.158.5.2285

Junttila, M.R., S. Saarinen, T. Schmidt, J. Kast, and J. Westermarck. 2005. Single-step Strep-tag purification for the isolation and identification of protein complexes from mammalian cells. *Proteomics*. 5:1199–1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400991

Kamphorst, A.O., A. Wieland, T. Nasti, S. Yang, R. Zhang, D.L. Barber, B.T. Konieczny, C.Z. Daugherty, L. Koenig, K. Yu, et al. 2017. Rescue of exhausted CD8 T cells by PD-1-targeted therapies is CD28-dependent. *Science*. 355:1423–1427. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0683

Kutzner, K., S. Woods, O. Karayel, T. Gehring, H. Yin, A. Flatley, C. Graß, N. Wimberger, M.J. Tofaute, T. Seeholzer, et al. 2022. Phosphorylation of serine-893 in CARD11 suppresses the formation and activity of the CARD11-BCL10-MALT1 complex in T and B cells. *Sci. Signal.* 15: eabk3083. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.abk3083

Lacher, S.B., J. Dörr, G.P. de Almeida, J. Hönninger, F. Bayer, A. Hirschberger, A.M. Pedde, P. Meiser, L. Ramsauer, T.J. Rudolph, et al. 2024. PGE₂ limits effector expansion of tumour-infiltrating stem-like CD8⁺ T cells. *Nature*. 629:417–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07254-x

Lévy, R., F. Gothe, M. Momenilandi, T. Magg, M. Materna, P. Peters, J. Rae-dler, Q. Philippot, A.L. Rack-Hoch, D. Langlais, et al. 2023. Human CARMIL2 deficiency underlies a broader immunological and clinical phenotype than CD28 deficiency. *J. Exp. Med.* 220:e20220275. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20220275

Liang, Y., M. Cucchetti, R. Roncagalli, T. Yokosuka, A. Malzac, E. Bertosio, J. Imbert, I.J. Nijman, M. Suchanek, T. Saito, et al. 2013. The lymphoid lineage-specific actin-uncapping protein Rltpr is essential for costimulation via CD28 and the development of regulatory T cells. *Nat. Immunol.* 14:858–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2634

Linterman, M.A., R.J. Rigby, R. Wong, D. Silva, D. Withers, G. Anderson, N.K. Verma, R. Brink, A. Hutloff, C.C. Goodnow, and C.G. Vinuesa. 2009. Roquin differentiates the specialized functions of duplicated T cell costimulatory receptor genes CD28 and ICOS. *Immunity*. 30:228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2008.12.015

Liu, Q., J. Zheng, W. Sun, Y. Huo, L. Zhang, P. Hao, H. Wang, and M. Zhuang. 2018. A proximity-tagging system to identify membrane protein-protein interactions. *Nat. Methods*. 15:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0100-5

Lotze, M.T., S.H. Olejniczak, and D. Skokos. 2024. CD28 co-stimulation: Novel insights and applications in cancer immunotherapy. *Nat. Rev. Immunol.* 24:878–895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-024-01061-1

Magen, A., P. Hamon, N. Fiaschi, B.Y. Soong, M.D. Park, R. Mattiuz, E. Humblin, L. Troncoso, D. D'souza, T. Dawson, et al. 2023. Intratoral dendritic cell-CD4⁺ T helper cell niches enable CD8⁺ T cell differentiation following PD-1 blockade in hepatocellular carcinoma. *Nat. Med.* 29: 1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02345-0
<figure><img src="image_58.png" /></figure>

Malissen, M., A. Gillet, L. Ardouin, G. Bouvier, J. Trucy, P. Ferrier, E. Vivier, and B. Malissen. 1995. Altered T cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the CD3-epsilon gene. *EMBO J.* 14:4641-4653. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00146.x

McSorley, S.J., and M.K. Jenkins. 2000. Antibody is required for protection against virulent but not attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. *Infect. Immun.* 68:3344-3348. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.6.3344-3348.2000

Medoff, B.D., B.P. Sandall, A. Landry, K. Nagahama, A. Mizoguchi, A.D. Luster, and R.J. Xavier. 2009. Differential requirement for CARMA1 in agonist-selected T-cell development. *Eur. J. Immunol.* 39:78-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200838734

Michel, F., G. Attal-Bonnefoy, G. Mangino, S. Mise-Omata, and O. Acuto. 2001. CD28 as a molecular amplifier extending TCR ligation and signaling capabilities. *Immunity*. 15:935-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00244-8

Nandi, D., J.A. Gross, and J.P. Allison. 1994. CD28-mediated costimulation is necessary for optimal proliferation of murine NK cells. *J. Immunol.* 152: 3361-3369. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.152.7.3361

Ovcinnikovs, V., E.M. Ross, L. Petersone, N.M. Edner, F. Heuts, E. Ntavli, A. Kogimtzis, A. Kennedy, C.J. Wang, C.L. Bennett, et al. 2019. CTLA-4-mediated transendocytosis of costimulatory molecules primarily targets migratory dendritic cells. *Sci. Immunol.* 4:eaw0902. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw0902

Pagán, A.J., M. Pepper, H.H. Chu, J.M. Green, and M.K. Jenkins. 2012. CD28 promotes CD4+ T cell clonal expansion during infection independently of its YMNM and PYAP motifs. *J. Immunol.* 189:2909-2917. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1103231

Park, J., J. Yang, A.T. Wenzel, A. Ramachandran, W.J. Lee, J.C. Daniels, J. Kim, E. Martinez-Escala, N. Amankulor, B. Pro, et al. 2017. Genomic analysis of 220 CTCLs identifies a novel recurrent gain-of-function alteration in RLTPR (p.Q575E). *Blood*. 130:1430-1440. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-02-768234

Park, Y., H.S. Jin, and Y.C. Liu. 2013. Regulation of T cell function by the ubiquitin-specific protease USP9X via modulating the Carmal-Bcl10-Malt1 complex. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 110:9433-9438. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221925110

Policheni, A.N., C.E. Teh, A. Robbins, S. Tuzlak, A. Strasser, and D.H.D. Gray. 2022. PD-1 cooperates with AIRE-mediated tolerance to prevent lethal autoimmune disease. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 119:e2120149119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120149119

Roncagalli, R., M. Cucchetti, N. Muzumyzenki, C. Grégoire, E. Bergot, S. Au-debert, E. Baudelet, M.G. Menoita, A. Joachim, S. Durand, et al. 2016. The scaffolding function of the RLTPR protein explains its essential role for CD28 co-stimulation in mouse and human T cells. *J. Exp. Med.* 213: 2437-2457. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20160579

Roncagalli, R., S. Hauri, F. Fiore, Y. Liang, Z. Chen, A. Sansoni, K. Kanduri, R. Joly, A. Malzac, H. Lähdesmäki, et al. 2014. Quantitative proteomics analysis of signalosome dynamics in primary T cells identifies the surface receptor CD6 as a Lat adaptor-independent TCR signaling hub. *Nat. Immunol.* 15:384-392. https://doi.org/10.1084/nli.2843

Ruland, J., and L. Hartjes. 2019. CARD-BCL-10-MALT1 signalling in protective and pathological immunity. *Nat. Rev. Immunol.* 19:118-134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0087-2

Schober, T., T. Magg, M. Laschinger, M. Rohlfs, N.D. Linhares, J. Puchalka, T. Weisser, K. Fehlner, J. Mautner, C. Walz, et al. 2017. A human immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in CARMIL2. *Nat. Commun.* 8:14209. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14209

Schwanhäusser, B., D. Busse, N. Li, G. Dittmar, J. Schuchhardt, J. Wolf, W. Chen, and M. Selbach. 2011. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. *Nature*. 473:337-342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10098

Shahinian, A., K. Pfeffer, K.P. Lee, T.M. Kündig, K. Kishihara, A. Wakeham, K. Kawai, P.S. Ohashi, C.B. Thompson, and T.W. Mak. 1993. Differential T cell costimulatory requirements in CD28-deficient mice. *Science*. 261: 609-612. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7688139

Shapiro, V.S., M.N. Mollenauer, and A. Weiss. 1998. Nuclear factor of activated T cells and AP-1 are insufficient for IL-2 promoter activation: Requirement for CD28 up-regulation of RE/AP. *J. Immunol.* 161: 6455-6458. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.161.12.6455

Skånland, S.S., and K. Taskén. 2019. Carboxyl-terminal Src kinase binds CD28 upon activation and mutes downstream signaling. *J. Immunol.* 203:1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1801660

Stark, B.C., M.H. Lanier, and J.A. Cooper. 2017. CARMIL family proteins as multidomain regulators of actin-based motility. *Mol. Biol. Cell.* 28: 1713-1723. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0019

Tai, X., M. Cowan, L. Feigenbaum, and A. Singer. 2005. CD28 costimulation of developing thymocytes induces Foxp3 expression and regulatory T cell differentiation independently of interleukin 2. *Nat. Immunol.* 6:152-162. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1160

Tai, X., F. Van Laethem, A.H. Sharpe, and A. Singer. 2007. Induction of autoimmune disease in CTLA-4-/- mice depends on a specific CD28 motif that is required for in vivo costimulation. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 104: 13756-13761. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706509104

Tian, R., N. Wang, G.D. Gish, E. Petsalaki, A. Pasculescu, Y. Shi, M. Molle-nauer, R.D. Bagshaw, N. Yosef, T. Hunter, et al. 2015. Combinatorial proteomic analysis of intercellular signaling applied to the CD28 T-cell costimulatory receptor. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.* 112:E1594-E1603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503286112

Uchida, Y., M. Yoshimitsu, M. Hachiman, S. Kusano, N. Arima, K. Shima, M. Hayashida, Y. Kamada, D. Nakamura, A. Araï, et al. 2021. RLTPR Q575E: A novel recurrent gain-of-function mutation in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. *Eur. J. Haematol.* 106:221-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13540

Vang, K.B., J. Yang, A.J. Pagán, L.X. Li, J. Wang, J.M. Green, A.A. Beg, and M.A. Farrar. 2010. Cutting edge: CD28 and c-Rel-dependent pathways initiate regulatory T cell development. *J. Immunol.* 184:4074-4077. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903933

Voisinne, G., K. Kersse, K. Chaoui, L. Lu, J. Chaix, L. Zhang, M. Goncalves Menoita, L. Girard, Y. Ounoughene, H. Wang, et al. 2019. Quantitative interatomics in primary T cells unveils TCR signal diversification extent and dynamics. *Nat. Immunol.* 20:1530-1541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-019-0489-8

Wang, Y., C.S. Ma, Y. Ling, A. Bousfiha, Y. Camcioglu, S. Jacquot, K. Payne, E. Crestani, R. Roncagalli, A. Belkadi, et al. 2016. Dual T cell- and B cell-intrinsic deficiency in humans with biallelic RLTPR mutations. *J. Exp. Med.* 213:2413-2435. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20160576

Watanabe, M., S. Celli, F.A. Alkhaleel, and R.J. Hodes. 2022. Antigen-presenting T cells provide critical B7 co-stimulation for thymic iNKT cell development via CD28-dependent trogocytosis. *Cell Rep.* 41: 111731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111731

Watanabe, M., Y. Lu, M. Breen, and R.J. Hodes. 2020. B7-CD28 co-stimulation modulates central tolerance via thymic clonal deletion and Treg generation through distinct mechanisms. *Nat. Commun.* 11:6264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20070-x

Walten, S.P., A. Redeker, K.L. Franken, J.D. Oduro, F. Ossendorp, L. Čičin-Săin, C.J. Melief, P. Aichele, and R. Arens. 2015. The viral context instructs the redundancy of costimulatory pathways in driving CD8(+) T cell expansion. *Elife*. 4:e07486. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07486

Williams, J.A., J.M. Lumsden, X. Yu, L. Feigenbaum, J. Zhang, S.M. Steinberg, and R.J. Hodes. 2008. Regulation of thymic NKT cell development by the B7-CD28 costimulatory pathway. *J. Immunol.* 181:907-917. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.907

Wong, H.S., K. Park, A. Gola, A.P. Baptista, C.H. Miller, D. Deep, M. Lou, L.F. Boyd, A.Y. Rudensky, P.A. Savage, et al. 2021. A local regulatory T cell feedback circuit maintains immune homeostasis by pruning self-activated T cells. *Cell.* 184:3981-3997.e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.028

Yu, W., N. Jiang, P.J. Ebert, B.A. Kidd, S. Müller, P.J. Lund, J. Juang, K. Adachi, T. Tse, M.E. Birnbaum, et al. 2015. Clonal deletion prunes but does not eliminate self-specific αβ CD8(+) T lymphocytes. *Immunity*. 42:929-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.001

Zelenay, S., A.G. van der Veen, J.P. Böttcher, K.J. Snelgrove, N. Rogers, S.E. Acton, P. Chakravarty, M.R. Girotti, R. Marais, S.A. Quezada, et al. 2015. Cyclooxygenase-dependent tumor growth through evasion of immunity. *Cell.* 162:1257-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.015

Zhang, L., W. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, Y. Gu, L. He, B. Zhou, T. Li, T. Chao, et al. 2022. sgRNA knock-in mouse provides an alternative approach for in vivo genetic modification. *Front. Cell Dev. Biol.* 9:769673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.769673

Zhang, R., C.M. Borges, M.Y. Fan, J.E. Harris, and L.A. Turka. 2015. Requirement for CD28 in effector regulatory T cell differentiation, CCR6 induction, and skin homing. *J. Immunol.* 195:4154-4161. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1500945

Zhao, Y., C. Caron, Y.Y. Chan, C.K. Lee, X. Xu, J. Zhang, T. Masubuchi, C. Wu, J.D. Bui, and E. Hui. 2023. cis-B7-CD28 interactions at invaginated synaptic membranes provide CD28 co-stimulation and promote CD8+ T cell function and anti-tumor immunity. *Immunity*. 56:1187-1203.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2023.04.005

Zwolak, A., C. Yang, E.A. Feeser, E.M. Ostap, T. Svitkina, and R. Dominguez. 2013. CARMIL leading edge localization depends on a non-canonical PH domain and dimerization. *Nat. Commun.* 4:2523. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3523
<figure><img src="image_59.png" /></figure>

Supplemental material

<figure><img src="image_60.png" /></figure>

Figure S1. **Schematic structure of the CARMIL proteins produced by WT mice and *Carmil2QE*, *Carmil2OST*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* gene-targeted mice.**
Mouse CARMIL2 proteins are 1,397-amino acid-long multidomain cytosolic proteins that consist of PH, LRR, HD, CBR, MBD, and PRD domains (Stark et al., 2017; Zwolak et al., 2013). The DNA strand opposite to the one coding for the 3' untranslated region of the mouse *Carmil2* gene corresponds to the 3' end of the *Acd* gene, which codes for a protein involved in telomere function, and its ablation is recessive lethal. In a former study, we developed gene-targeted mice expressing CARMIL2 proteins tagged at their carboxyl terminus with an affinity OST tag. The introduction of the OST coding sequence at the 3' end of the *Carmil2* gene adventitiously impaired the expression of the *Acd* gene. It prevented the establishment of mice homozygous for the *Carmil2OST* allele and reduced the sensitivity of our AP-MS analysis since only half of the CARMIL2 molecules were OST-tagged in viable heterozygous mice (Roncagalli et al., 2016). Therefore, to bypass this limitation, the present study uses mice in which the CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> proteins were tagged with an OST tag at their N terminus. As a result, mice homozygous for those *Carmil2OST* and *Carmil2QE-OST* alleles were born at expected Mendelian frequencies. Moreover, introduction of the OST tag at the N terminus of CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules did not change their levels of expression as compared to their untagged counterparts (Fig. 2 A). *Carmil2QE* mice expressing CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules lacking an OST tag were also developed (see Materials and methods). They had a phenotype similar to that of *Carmil2QE-OST* mice (Fig. S5) and were used interchangeably with *Carmil2QE-OST* mice. PH, pleckstrin homology domain; LRR, leucine-rich region; HD, helical dimerization domain; CBR, capping protein-binding region; MBD, membrane-binding domain; PRD, proline-rich domain.
<figure><img src="image_61.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_62.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_63.png" /></figure>

Figure S2. Comparative expression of cell surface markers on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells of WT, *Carmil2OST*, *Carmil2QE-OST*, OT-I *Carmil2*, OT-I *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-Cd28⁻/⁻* mice. (A) Related to Fig. 2. Naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells purified from the spleen and LN of WT, *Carmil2OST*, *Carmil2QE-OST*, OT-I *Carmil2*, OT-I *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-Cd28⁻/⁻* mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for the levels of TCR, CD3, and CD28 prior to biochemical analysis (shaded curves). Dashed line curves correspond to isotype-matched control antibodies (negative controls), and data are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Related to Fig. 6. Naive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells purified from the spleen and LN of WT, *Cd28⁻/⁻*, *Carmil2⁻/⁻*, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-Cd28⁻/⁻* mice (see key) were activated in vitro using anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 cross-linkage, and the levels of ICOS (CD278), CD71, CD98, BTLA (CD272), and PD-1 (CD279) were measured by flow cytometry prior to activation (t₀, solid line curves) or after 48 h of activation (t₄₈, shaded curves). Data are representative of two experiments, each with a total of six mice per genotype.
<figure><img src="image_64.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_65.png" /></figure>

Figure S3. **OT-I T cells develop normally in the presence of CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules.** (A) Total cells from OT-I and OT-I *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* thymi were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD4 and CD8. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD4<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>-</sup> double-negative, CD4<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> double-positive, and CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> SP cells. Also shown on the right is the cellularity of OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* thymi. (B) Total cells from OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* thymi were analyzed for the expression of TCRβ and CD24. It permits to distinguish mature CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells (TCRβ<sup>+</sup>CD24<sup>+</sup>) and immature SP CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells (TCRβ<sup>-</sup>CD24<sup>+</sup>), the percentages of which are indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the quantification of the numbers of TCRβ<sup>+</sup>CD24<sup>-</sup> mature CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells found in OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* thymi. (C) T cells from OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* LN were analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells, the percentages of which are indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the quantification of the numbers of T cells in OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* LN. (D) Gated CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells from LN of OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* mice (see C) were analyzed using CD44 and CD62L expression. The percentages of naive (CD44<sup>lo</sup>CD62L<sup>hi</sup>), effector-memory (CD44<sup>hi</sup>CD62L<sup>lo</sup>), and central memory (CD44<sup>hi</sup>CD62L<sup>hi</sup>) CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells are indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the quantification of the numbers of CD8<sup>+</sup> effector-memory T cells in OT-I and OT-1 *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* LN. Data in A–D were pooled from three independent experiments with a total of six mice per group. Data quantification is shown as box plots with the median, boxed interquartile, and whiskers. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA applying the Holm–Sidàk multiple comparison toward the OT-I group. \*P < 0.05, ns, nonsignificant. SP, single positive.
<figure><img src="image_66.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_67.png" /></figure>

**Figure S4. Model summarizing the CD28-dependent traits induced by CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent or CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signals.**
In naive T cells, CD28 engagement by its CD80-CD86 ligands expressed on immunogenic APC triggers both CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent and CARMIL2-CARD11-independent signaling branches. The developmental and functional consequences of CD28 engagement for which the CARMIL2-CARD11-dependent or CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signaling branches are necessary and sufficient are shown below each signaling branch. Engagement of the TCR results in the activation of the LCK and ZAP-70 protein tyrosine kinases. It leads to the formation of the LAT signalosome, which controls phospholipase PLC-γ1 activity and triggers the production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol (DAG), ultimately resulting in the activation of the NFAT and AP1 transcription factors (Shapiro et al., 1998). DAG also promotes the recruitment of the protein serine/threonine kinase PKC-θ at the plasma membrane, enabling its incorporation into the CD28 microclusters that form at the immune synapse and contain CARMIL2-CARD11 complexes (Liang et al., 2013). Following phosphorylation by PKC-θ and additional TCR-operated protein serine/threonine kinases, the CARD11 molecules bound to CARMIL2 associate with BCL10 and MALT1 to give rise to CBM complexes capable of activating the NF-κB transcription factor, the JNK, and the MALT1 protease (Ruland and Hartjes, 2019). PI3K constitutes one of the effectors of the CARMIL2-CARD11-independent CD28 signaling branch. It accounts for CD28-mediated production of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP3), leading to the recruitment and activation of the PH domain-containing protein kinase AKT and the occurrence of CD28-CD80 cis interactions at the immune synapse (Zhao et al., 2023). CD28-generated PIP3 also enhances the recruitment and activity of ITK and PLC-γ1, two pleckstrin homology domain-containing proteins that are part of the TCR-operated LAT signalosome, thereby reinforcing the production of DAG (Michel et al., 2001). CD28 costimulation also promotes the ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CBL-B, and regulates mRNA processing and T cell metabolism via signals that remain to be characterized (Lotze et al., 2024). The CD28 cytoplasmic tail contains three distinct protein-protein interaction motifs denoted as YMNM, PYAPP, and AAYRS (red circles), and the PYAPP motif is the sole necessary to trigger the CARMIL2-CARD11-mediated signals; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase.
<figure><img src="image_68.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_69.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_70.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_71.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_72.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_73.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_74.png" /></figure>

Figure S5. **Thymus and LN of WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice have similar phenotypes.** (A) WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* thymi were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD4 and CD8. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD4$^+$CD8$^-$ double-negative, CD4$^+$CD8$^+$ double-positive, and CD4$^+$CD8$^+$ single-positive cells. Also shown on the right is the cellularity of WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* thymi. (B) Total cells from WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN were analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression of TCRβ and TCRγδ, and the corresponding percentages of TCRβ$^+$ and TCRγδ$^+$ cells were indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the number of TCRβ$^+$ and TCRγδ$^+$ cells in WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see key in A). (C) TCRβ$^+$ cells from WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see gating strategy in B) were analyzed for CD4 and CD8 expression and the percentages of CD4$^+$ and CD8$^+$ cells indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the number of TCRαβ$^+$ CD4$^+$ and CD8$^+$ T cells in WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see key in A). (D) FOXP3$^+$ T$_{reg}$ cells present among total CD4$^+$ T cells isolated from WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN were analyzed by flow cytometry using FOXP3 and CD25 expression, and their percentages were indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the number of FOXP3$^+$ T$_{reg}$ cells in WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see key in A). (E) CD4$^+$ T$_{conv}$ cells found in the LN of WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice (gated as in D) were analyzed by flow cytometry using CD44 and CD62L expression, and the percentages of naive (CD44$^{lo}$CD62L$^{hi}$) and effector-memory (CD44$^{hi}$CD62L$^{lo}$) cells were indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the number of effector-memory CD4$^+$ T cells in WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see key in A). (F) CD8$^+$ T cells found in the LN of WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* mice (gated as in C) were analyzed by flow cytometry using CD44 and CD62L expression, and the percentages of naive (CD44$^{lo}$CD62L$^{hi}$) and central plus effector-memory (CD44$^{hi}$CD62L$^{low}$ to $^{high}$) cells were indicated by the number adjacent to outlined areas. Also shown on the right is the number of central plus effector-memory CD8$^+$ T cells in WT, *Carmil2QE*, and *Carmil2QE-OST* LN (see key in A). Data in A–D are representative of two independent experiments, with two mice per genotype.
<figure><img src="image_75.png" /></figure>

Provided online are Table S1, Table S2, Table S3, Table S4, Data S1, and Data S2. Table S1 shows criteria used to define whether CARMIL2-CARD11-driven signals are necessary and sufficient to trigger a given CD28-dependent trait. Table S2 shows the list of the proteins interacting with both CARMIL2 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup> molecules in mouse CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells after 2 min of activation. Table S3 shows single-strand DNA HDR template sequences. Table S4 shows sgRNA sequences. Data S1 is related to Fig. 9 and shows the interactome dataset of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells isolated from *Carmil2* and *Carmil2<sup>QE</sup>* mice. Data S2 is related to Fig. 9 and shows the correlation analysis permitting to define the CARMIL2 interactors that show a temporal profile of interaction stoichiometry similar to that of the CARMIL2-CARD11 and CARMIL2<sup>QE</sup>-CARD11 interactions.