The P specimen with barcode P02273224 has a label with the title "L. Cl. Richard. Herbarium Guyan-Antillanum" handwritten in red ink, and the annotations "Genipella triflora", an unpublished name, probably handwritten by Louis Claude Richard, and "Cordiera triflora nob." handwritten by Achille Richard. The specimen consists of a sterile branch with numerous leaves and the characteristic acuminate stipules.

The P specimen with barcode P03821425 has a label with the title "L. Cl. Richard. Herbarium Guyanesis-Antillanum, Cordiera" handwritten in red ink, and "Genipella triflora mihi, Ad flumen Kourou" probably handwritten by Louis Claude Richard. The specimen consists of a branch with numerous leaves, one female flower in anthesis, and several mature fruits.

The P specimen with barcode P03821427 has a label with the title "L. Cl. Richard. Herbarium Guyanesis-Antillanum" handwritten in red ink, and "Cordiera triflora mihi, Ad flumen Kourou, Guyane" handwritten by Achille Richard. The specimen consists of a branch with numerous leaves, several ovaries (corollas fallen off), and one female flower in anthesis.

The P specimen with barcode P03821428 has a label with the title "L. Cl. Richard. Herbarium Guyanesis-Antillanum" handwritten in red ink, and "Cordiera triflora mihi, Ad flumen Kourou, Guyane" handwritten by Achille Richard. The specimen consists of a branch with numerous leaves, and several female flowers in anthesis. This is the specimen that was designated as lectotype of this name by Persson and Delprete (2017: 195).

In F there is a specimen with accession number 971705 [barcode V0068819F]. It has a label with the annotation "Cordiera triflora Rich., Rive du Kourou, Guyane, Legit Cl. Richard" handwritten by an unknown author (not Richard), and the stamp "Ex Herbario Musei Parisiensis." The specimen consists of a branch with numerous leaves, one flower bud, and a female flower in anthesis, and is very similar to the original specimens in P. This specimen is an isolectotype.

11. **COUSSAREA** Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane 98, 3: pl. 38. 1775.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 268:
"11-1. *Coussarea contracta* (Walp.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 467. 1875; emend. Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 92. 1881. - *Faramea contracta* Walp., Nov. Actorum Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur. 19, Suppl. 1: 351. 1843; Benth., Linnaea 23: 448. 1850. - *Coussarea contracta* (Walp.) Hook. f. in Benth. & Hook. f., *comb. inval.*, Gen. Pl. 2: 121. 1873. Tipo: Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, perto da cidade de Rio de Janeiro, *Meyen s.n.* (não encontrado; o herbário de Walpers foi vendido mas não se sabe por quem foi comprado e até agora não foi localizado)."

**Accepted name:** *Coussarea contracta* (Walp.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Near the city of Rio de Janeiro, s.d., "Meyens" [F.J.F. Meyen] s.n. (K [bar-code K000432690], *lectotype here designated*).

**Notes:** Walpers (1843: 351-352) in the protologue of *Faramea contracta* Walp. cited the material studied as "Brasilia: prope Rio de Janeiro, (v. s.)", meaning that he saw herbarium specimen(s) collected in Rio de Janeiro, without citing the herbarium of deposit. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1988: 45) "Walper's own herbarium containing many of the types of his new taxa, was sold after his death. This herbarium contained about 3000 species in 53 portfolio's "fast ungeordnet". [...] All these collections were offered for sale, but their present location is unknown." At K there is a specimen with barcode K000432690. It has a label with the handwritten annotation (author unknown) "Faramea contracta Walpers, proxima F. latifolia DC. Brasilia. Prof. Dr. Meyens legit (Walpers)." Most likely, both Walpers' original citation and the label of this specimen refer to a collection made by the Prussian Franz Julius Ferdinand Meyen (1804-1840), who was on a tour around the World during 1830-1832, as Physician and Botanist, and collected in Brazil (Vegter, 1976). The K specimen consists of a branch with numerous leaves and several inflorescences and is here designated the lectotype of *Faramea contracta* Walp.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 273:
"11-2. *Coussarea hydrangeifolia* (Benth.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 467. 1875, emend. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 94. 1881. - *Faramea hydrangeaefolia* Benth., Linnaea 23: 451. 1850. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, Gardner 3219 (lectótipo, K, selecionado por Gomes, 2003, foto em RB). Parátipos: Brasil, Minas Gerais e Goiás, Claussen s.n., Gardner 3222, Pohl s.n., Sello s.n."

**Accepted name:** *Coussarea hydrangeifolia* (Benth.) Benth. & Hook. f. ex Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: without locality ["roads Natividade"], s.d. [1841], G. Gardner 3219 (K [bar-code K000432692] *lectotype here designated*;
12. **COUTAREA** Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane 314, pl. 122. 1775.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 295:
"12-1. **Coutarea hexandra** (Jacq.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 196. 1889. - *Portlandia hexandra* Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 16. 1760; Jacq. Sel. Stirp. Am. pl. 182, fig. 20. 1763. Tipo: Guiana Francesa, *Aublet s.n.* (lectótipo P, aqui escolhido)."

**Accepted name:** *Coutarea hexandra* (Jacq.) K.Schum.

Type: COLOMBIA. Bolívar: Vicinity of Cartagena, s.d., *N.J. Jacquin s.n.* (BM [barcode 000081660, with one flower] lectotype designated by Delprete (1999b: 47)).

**Notes:** Jacquin (1760: 16) described *Portlandia hexandra* Jacq. as only "floribus hexandris" without indicating a gathering or herbarium of deposit. The original material of this name was collected by him on the Caribbean Coast of Colombia.

D'Arcy (1970) stated "today there is no single "Jacquin Herbarium" but his specimens are to be found at Vienna [W], the Linnaean Herbarium [LINN], in the British Museum [BM], and some are dispersed in other European herbaria." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979: 407) "Sir Joseph Banks acquired Jacquin material. This is often referred to in literature as the Jacquin herbarium. [...] It is difficult to find West Indian material collected by him. It is doubtful whether Jacquin brought home from the West Indies sizeable collections of dried plants. J.E. Dandy informed us that the Jacquin material from the West Indies in the Banks herbarium (now BM) is rare and consists of scraps or small specimens."

Steyermark (1972: 297) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Type. Cartagena, Colombia" without citing any herbarium of deposit.

Delprete (1999b, in Harling & Andersson, 1999: 47) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Type: Jacquin s.n.; Colombia, Dept. Bolívar, vicinity of Cartagena (BM, one flower!)." This citation is an inadvertent typification of the BM specimen. Although the BM specimen is only a single flower in anthesis, it presents sufficient diagnostic characters for this species, and the designation of an epitype is not necessary.

Delprete (2010a: 295) erroneously cited the lectotype of *Portlandia hexandra* as a specimen collected by Aublet in French Guiana. As indicated by Delprete (2015), the specimen collected by Aublet in French Guiana is the type of *Coutarea speciosa* Aubl., a synonym of *Port-

landia hexandra*, and the neotype of this name was designated by Delprete (2015: 603) as "*Aublet s.n.* (P-JU No. 9927a! [branch with flowers]; isoneotype, P-JU No. 9927b! [fruits and seeds])."

Ochoterena (2012: 70) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Holotipo: Colombia, *Jacquin s.n.* (BM!)," but that specimen was previously designated as the lectotype by Delprete (1999b: 47).

Searching for additional original material of *Portlandia hexandra*, there is a specimen in B-W, barcode B-W 03931-01 0, with the handwritten label "Coutarea speciosa, Coutarea Aubl., Guyane (Richard)" and "Richard. W." handwritten directly on the sheet, indicating that it is part of the Willdenow Herbarium (B-W). Because that specimen was collected by L.C.M. Richard in French Guiana it is not original material, as the original collection was made by Jacquin in Colombia.

13. **DECLIEUXIA** Kunth in Humb. & Bonpl., Nov. Gen. Sp.: 3: 275 (folio), tab. 281. 1819 ("1818"); 3: 35 (quarto ed.), tab. 281. 1820.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 304:
"13-1. **Declieuxia aspalathoides** Muell. Arg., Flora 59: 438. 1876. Tipo: Brasil, Bahia, "editis montanis ad Vila de Rio das Contas", s.d., *Martius 1972* (holótipo M, isótipo M, frag-M em G)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia aspalathoides* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Bahia: "editis montanis ad Villa de Rio das Contas", s.d., *C.F.P. Martius 1972* (holotype M [barcode M-0187221]; possible isotype (without collection number, without locality) M [barcode M-0187220]; isotype fragment G [ex M, barcode G00177986]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 307:
"13-2a. **Declieuxia cordigera** Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. var. *cordigera*, Mantissa ...Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, Cachoeira do Campo, IV/1839, *Martius 1059* (lectótipo BR, escolhido por Kirkbride, 1976; isolectótipo LE; foto-BR em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia cordigera* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. var. *cordigera*

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Cachoeira do Campo, Apr. 1839, *C.F.P. Martius 1059* (BR n.v., lectotype
12. **COUTAREA** Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane 314, pl. 122. 1775.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 295:
"12-1. **Coutarea hexandra** (Jacq.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 196. 1889. - *Portlandia hexandra* Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 16. 1760; Jacq. Sel. Stirp. Am. pl. 182, fig. 20. 1763. Tipo: Guiana Francesa, *Aublet s.n.* (lectótipo P, aqui escolhido)."

**Accepted name:** *Coutarea hexandra* (Jacq.) K.Schum.

Type: COLOMBIA. Bolívar: Vicinity of Cartagena, s.d., *N.J. Jacquin s.n.* (BM [barcode 000081660, with one flower] lectotype designated by Delprete (1999b: 47)).

**Notes:** Jacquin (1760: 16) described *Portlandia hexandra* Jacq. as only "floribus hexandris" without indicating a gathering or herbarium of deposit. The original material of this name was collected by him on the Caribbean Coast of Colombia.

D'Arcy (1970) stated "today there is no single "Jacquin Herbarium" but his specimens are to be found at Vienna [W], the Linnaean Herbarium [LINN], in the British Museum [BM], and some are dispersed in other European herbaria." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979: 407) "Sir Joseph Banks acquired Jacquin material. This is often referred to in literature as the Jacquin herbarium. [...] It is difficult to find West Indian material collected by him. It is doubtful whether Jacquin brought home from the West Indies sizeable collections of dried plants. J.E. Dandy informed us that the Jacquin material from the West Indies in the Banks herbarium (now BM) is rare and consists of scraps or small specimens."

Steyermark (1972: 297) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Type. Cartagena, Colombia" without citing any herbarium of deposit.

Delprete (1999b, in Harling & Andersson, 1999: 47) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Type: Jacquin s.n.; Colombia, Dept. Bolívar, vicinity of Cartagena (BM, one flower!)." This citation is an inadvertent typification of the BM specimen. Although the BM specimen is only a single flower in anthesis, it presents sufficient diagnostic characters for this species, and the designation of an epitype is not necessary.

Delprete (2010a: 295) erroneously cited the lectotype of *Portlandia hexandra* as a specimen collected by Aublet in French Guiana. As indicated by Delprete (2015), the specimen collected by Aublet in French Guiana is the type of *Coutarea speciosa* Aubl., a synonym of *Port-

landia hexandra*, and the neotype of this name was designated by Delprete (2015: 603) as "*Aublet s.n.* (P-JU No. 9927a! [branch with flowers]; isoneotype, P-JU No. 9927b! [fruits and seeds])."

Ochoterena (2012: 70) cited the type of *Portlandia hexandra* as "Holotipo: Colombia, *Jacquin s.n.* (BM!)," but that specimen was previously designated as the lectotype by Delprete (1999b: 47).

Searching for additional original material of *Portlandia hexandra*, there is a specimen in B-W, barcode B-W 03931-01 0, with the handwritten label "Coutarea speciosa, Coutarea Aubl., Guyane (Richard)" and "Richard. W." handwritten directly on the sheet, indicating that it is part of the Willdenow Herbarium (B-W). Because that specimen was collected by L.C.M. Richard in French Guiana it is not original material, as the original collection was made by Jacquin in Colombia.

13. **DECLIEUXIA** Kunth in Humb. & Bonpl., Nov. Gen. Sp.: 3: 275 (folio), tab. 281. 1819 ("1818"); 3: 35 (quarto ed.), tab. 281. 1820.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 304:
"13-1. **Declieuxia aspalathoides** Muell. Arg., Flora 59: 438. 1876. Tipo: Brasil, Bahia, "editis montanis ad Vila de Rio das Contas", s.d., *Martius 1972* (holótipo M, isótipo M, frag-M em G)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia aspalathoides* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Bahia: "editis montanis ad Villa de Rio das Contas", s.d., *C.F.P. Martius 1972* (holotype M [barcode M-0187221]; possible isotype (without collection number, without locality) M [barcode M-0187220]; isotype fragment G [ex M, barcode G00177986]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 307:
"13-2a. **Declieuxia cordigera** Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. var. *cordigera*, Mantissa ...Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, Cachoeira do Campo, IV/1839, *Martius 1059* (lectótipo BR, escolhido por Kirkbride, 1976; isolectótipo LE; foto-BR em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia cordigera* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. var. *cordigera*

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Cachoeira do Campo, Apr. 1839, *C.F.P. Martius 1059* (BR n.v., lectotype
designated by Kirkbride (1976: 34); isolectotype LE n.v.; photo-BR in NY).

*Declieuxia cacuminis* Müll. Arg. var. *tocantinensis* Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 6(2): 394, figs. 1-2. 2012.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Mun. Porto Alegre do Tocantins, bacia do Rio Tocantins, sub-bacia do Rio Balsas (T-9, 9 Km da area 3, Ponto 20), estrada para Ponte Alta, entrada apos Cachoeira da Fumaça, 546 m, 11°05'26"S, 46°52'00"W, solo argilo-arenoso-avermelhado, quartzo, afloramento calcario, relevo plano a ondulado (morro), campo sujo/cerrado ralo (savana gramineo-lenhosa), cerrado sobre o morro, 4 Jul. 2009, M.L. Fonseca, F.C.A. Oliveira, A.P. Silva Filho & V.C. Oliveira 6086 (holotype, IBGE [Acc. No. 69961]; isotypes, HUTO [Acc. No. 3302], RB [barcode 00598105, Acc. No. 502575]).

**Notes:** *Declieuxia cacuminis* var. *tocantinensis* Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr. was described by Kirkbride and Delprete (2012), after Delprete (2010a) published his Rubiaceae treatment for the Flora of Goiás and Tocantinas. This variety is only known from the type locality and is the only record of *D. cacuminis* in the states of Goiás and Tocantins.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 313:
"13-3. *Declieuxia dasyphylla* K. Schum. ex Steyerm., Los Angeles County Mus. Contr. Sci. 21: 24. 1958. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "entre Tocantins et Os Porcos", 3/I/1895, *Glaziou* 21502 (holótipo F [ex frag-B]; isótipos BR, C, F, LE, R; foto-B em NY)."

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: "entre Tocantins et Os Porcos", 3 Jan. 1895, A.F.M. *Glaziou* 21502 (B†; holotype F [frag. ex B; Acc. No. 606557]; isotypes BR [barcode 000000530647], C [barcode C10018107], F [Acc. No. 970588], G [barcode G00436010], K [barcode K000432972], LE n.v., P [2 sheets, barcodes P02285264, P02285265], R [barcode R000038880], S [Acc. No. S-R-7796]; photo-B [F0BN000703] in F, NY).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 317:
"13-4. *Declieuxia fruticosa* (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. Pl. 1: 279. 1891. - *Houstonia fruticosa* Willd. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 527. 1818. Tipo: Venezuela, Monagas, Caripe, Vendémiaire, IX-X/1790, A. *Humboldt* & A. *Bonpland* 223 (holótipo B-Willd; isótipo P)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia fruticosa* (Willd.) Kuntze

Type: VENEZUELA. Monagas: Caripe, Vendémiaire an 8, [23 Sep.-Oct. 1799], A. Bonpland & A. Humboldt 223 (holotype B-W [barcode B -W 02688 -01 0]; isotypes, HAL [barcode HAL0114302], P [barcode P00135082]).

*Declieuxia chiococcoides* Kunth in Humboldt et al., Nov. Gen. Sp. 3: 354 (ed. quarto), 276 (ed. folio). 21 Nov. 1819, *nom. illeg. superfl.*

(=) *Houstonia fruticosa* Willd. in Roemer & Schultes, Syst. Veg. 3: 527. Apr.-Jul. 1818.

**Notes:** For additional information regarding the types of *Declieuxia fruticosa* and *D. chiococcoides*, see Kirkbride and Wiersema (2020).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 333:
"13-5. *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H. Kirkbr., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 28: 31. 1976. Tipo: Brasil, *Goiás*, ca. 25 km S de Niquelândia, 1000 m, 21/I/1972, *Irwin, Anderson, Stieber & Lee* 34660 (holótipo UB; isótipos BR, C, F, G, K, LE, LIL, NY, RB, UB, US)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H.Kirkbr.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: ca. 25 km S de Niquelândia, 1000 m, 21 Jan. 1972, H.S. Irwin, W.R. Anderson, M. Stieber & E.Y.-T. *Lee* 34660 (holotype, UB [barcode UB0040288, Acc. No. 50823]; isotypes BR [barcode 000000530615], C n.v, F [Acc. No. 1817340], G [barcode G00389988], K [barcode K000432973], LE [barcode LE 00007892], LIL [barcode LIL001548], NY [3 sheets, barcodes 00129779, 00131224, 00131225], RB [barcode 00543543, Acc. No. 225512], UB [lost or destroyed], US [barcode 00129779]).

**Notes:** Kirkbride (1976: 31) for *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H.Kirkbr. cited the holotype and one of the isotypes at UB. The holotype specimen is at UB, and has barcode UB0040288. But, after exhaustive serches, it was concluded that the UB isotype is not there.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 336:
"13-6. *Declieuxia lysimachioides* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, Serro Frio, *Martius* 634 (holótipo, M; frag-M em G)."
designated by Kirkbride (1976: 34); isolectotype LE n.v.; photo-BR in NY).

*Declieuxia cacuminis* Müll. Arg. var. *tocantinensis* Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 6(2): 394, figs. 1-2. 2012.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Mun. Porto Alegre do Tocantins, bacia do Rio Tocantins, sub-bacia do Rio Balsas (T-9, 9 Km da area 3, Ponto 20), estrada para Ponte Alta, entrada apos Cachoeira da Fumaça, 546 m, 11°05'26"S, 46°52'00"W, solo argilo-arenoso-avermelhado, quartzo, afloramento calcario, relevo plano a ondulado (morro), campo sujo/cerrado ralo (savana gramineo-lenhosa), cerrado sobre o morro, 4 Jul. 2009, M.L. Fonseca, F.C.A. Oliveira, A.P. Silva Filho & V.C. Oliveira 6086 (holotype, IBGE [Acc. No. 69961]; isotypes, HUTO [Acc. No. 3302], RB [barcode 00598105, Acc. No. 502575]).

**Notes:** *Declieuxia cacuminis* var. *tocantinensis* Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr. was described by Kirkbride and Delprete (2012), after Delprete (2010a) published his Rubiaceae treatment for the Flora of Goiás and Tocantinas. This variety is only known from the type locality and is the only record of *D. cacuminis* in the states of Goiás and Tocantins.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 313:
"13-3. *Declieuxia dasyphylla* K. Schum. ex Steyerm., Los Angeles County Mus. Contr. Sci. 21: 24. 1958. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "entre Tocantins et Os Porcos", 3/I/1895, *Glaziou* 21502 (holótipo F [ex frag-B]; isótipos BR, C, F, LE, R; foto-B em NY)."

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: "entre Tocantins et Os Porcos", 3 Jan. 1895, A.F.M. *Glaziou* 21502 (B†; holotype F [frag. ex B; Acc. No. 606557]; isotypes BR [barcode 000000530647], C [barcode C10018107], F [Acc. No. 970588], G [barcode G00436010], K [barcode K000432972], LE n.v., P [2 sheets, barcodes P02285264, P02285265], R [barcode R000038880], S [Acc. No. S-R-7796]; photo-B [F0BN000703] in F, NY).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 317:
"13-4. *Declieuxia fruticosa* (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. Pl. 1: 279. 1891. - *Houstonia fruticosa* Willd. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 527. 1818. Tipo: Venezuela, Monagas, Caripe, Vendémiaire, IX-X/1790, A. *Humboldt* & A. *Bonpland* 223 (holótipo B-Willd; isótipo P)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia fruticosa* (Willd.) Kuntze

Type: VENEZUELA. Monagas: Caripe, Vendémiaire an 8, [23 Sep.-Oct. 1799], A. Bonpland & A. Humboldt 223 (holotype B-W [barcode B -W 02688 -01 0]; isotypes, HAL [barcode HAL0114302], P [barcode P00135082]).

*Declieuxia chiococcoides* Kunth in Humboldt et al., Nov. Gen. Sp. 3: 354 (ed. quarto), 276 (ed. folio). 21 Nov. 1819, *nom. illeg. superfl.*

(=) *Houstonia fruticosa* Willd. in Roemer & Schultes, Syst. Veg. 3: 527. Apr.-Jul. 1818.

**Notes:** For additional information regarding the types of *Declieuxia fruticosa* and *D. chiococcoides*, see Kirkbride and Wiersema (2020).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 333:
"13-5. *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H. Kirkbr., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 28: 31. 1976. Tipo: Brasil, *Goiás*, ca. 25 km S de Niquelândia, 1000 m, 21/I/1972, *Irwin, Anderson, Stieber & Lee* 34660 (holótipo UB; isótipos BR, C, F, G, K, LE, LIL, NY, RB, UB, US)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H.Kirkbr.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: ca. 25 km S de Niquelândia, 1000 m, 21 Jan. 1972, H.S. Irwin, W.R. Anderson, M. Stieber & E.Y.-T. *Lee* 34660 (holotype, UB [barcode UB0040288, Acc. No. 50823]; isotypes BR [barcode 000000530615], C n.v, F [Acc. No. 1817340], G [barcode G00389988], K [barcode K000432973], LE [barcode LE 00007892], LIL [barcode LIL001548], NY [3 sheets, barcodes 00129779, 00131224, 00131225], RB [barcode 00543543, Acc. No. 225512], UB [lost or destroyed], US [barcode 00129779]).

**Notes:** Kirkbride (1976: 31) for *Declieuxia lancifolia* J.H.Kirkbr. cited the holotype and one of the isotypes at UB. The holotype specimen is at UB, and has barcode UB0040288. But, after exhaustive serches, it was concluded that the UB isotype is not there.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 336:
"13-6. *Declieuxia lysimachioides* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, Serro Frio, *Martius* 634 (holótipo, M; frag-M em G)."
**Accepted name and correct authority:** *Declieuxia lysimachioides* Zucc. in Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serro Frio, s.d., C.F.P. Martius 634 (holotype, M [barcode M-0187396]; isotype G [fragment ex M; barcode G00177991]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 340:
"13-7. *Declieuxia oenanthioides* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, São Paulo, "prope Jundiahy", I/1818, *Martius* 984 (lectótipo M, escolhido por Kirkbride, 1976; isolectótipo M; fotos em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia oenanthoides* Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. f.

**Correct name and authority:** *Declieuxia oenanthoides* Zucc. in Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827.

Type: BRAZIL. São Paulo: "prope Jundiahy", Jan. 1818, C.F.P. Martius 984 (M [barcode M0187392], neotype designated by Kirkbride (1976: 42); isotype M [barcode M0187391]; photos-M in NY).

**Notes:** Schultes and Schultes (1827: 111-113.) published 16 new species of *Declieuxia* from Brazil; they attributed the names of nine of them to Martius, and the other seven to Zuccarini. In the protologue of *D. oenanthoides* Mart. ex Zucc., it is stated "n. 6. Declieuxia oenanthoides* Mart.; herbacea, glabra; caule subsimplici; foliis quaternis, remotis, lineari-lanceolatis, acutis; racemis bifidis, paniculato-terminalibus. *Zucc. in litt.*" No locality, no collector, and no specimen are cited. At the end of each new species protologue, is the statement "Zucc. in Litt.", which signifies that the new species protologues were supplied by Zuccarini in a letter. Kirkbride (1976: 42) gave the authorship of *D. oenanthoides* as "Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult." but this is not correct according to the current code. The authorship of the nine species attributed to Martius should be "Mart.", and the seven names attributed to Zuccarini should be "Zucc." (Art. 46.3 Ex. 15).

Schultes and Schultes did not see specimens of their new species. Therefore, the Schultes and Schultes herbarium at KW (Kyiv, Ukraine) has no bearing on the typification of these new *Declieuxia* names, and there cannot be any original material in KW of their *Declieuxia* names. Kirkbride (1976: 42) cited the type of

*D. oenanthoides* as "lectotype M, fragment G; isotype M". Since there is no original material, Kirkbride citation is here corrected to a designation of a neotype and an isotype at M, and an isotype fragment at G. Those specimens did not have barcode numbers when Kirkbride studied them. The specimen at M annotated by him as holotype, which is the neotype, has barcode number M0187392, and that at M annotated by him as isotype, which is an isotype, has barcode number M0187391.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 349:
"13-8. *Declieuxia pruinosa* Pohl ex DC., Prodr. 4: 481. 1830. *- Psyllocarpus pruinosus* Pohl ex DC., *in syn.*, Prodr. 4: 481. 1830. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, "inter Rio Jequitinhonha et Columbis", *Pohl* 3147 (holótipo G-DC; isótipos NY, W)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia pruinosa* DC. (Art. 46.4).

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: "inter Rio Jequitinhonha et Columbis", s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl* 3147 (861d) (holotype G-DC [barcode G00666586]; isotypes NY [barcode 00131226], W [Acc. No. W0074506]).

**Notes:** Candolle (1830: 481) cited *Declieuxia pruinosa* Pohl ex DC. as "D. pruinosa (Pohl! in litt. sub Psyllocarpo)" and the material studied as "5 in Brasiliâ legit cl. Pohl. (v.s.)." The expression "v.s." (*vidi siccum*) means that he saw a specimen in his own herbarium (now G-DC). In G-DC there is a sole specimen associated with this name, with barcode 00666586. On the lower right corner of the sheet is pinned a label with the annotation "Psyllocarpus pruinosus Pohl!, Declieuxia--------- [pruinosa] DC." handwritten by Candolle. The specimen consists of a branch with several leaves and a terminal inflorescence, and next to it there is a small portion of a branch with two leaf pairs. At the base of these two branches is affixed a label with the annotation "Psyllocarpus pruinosus - Brésil, m. Pohl 1828" handwritten by an unknown author. This specimen is the holotype of *D. pruinosa*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 351:
"13-9. *Declieuxia verticillata* Muell. Arg., Flora 59(28): 438. 1876. Tipo: Brasil, Mato Grosso, in campis arenosis, Rio Pardo, X/1826, *Riedel* 599 (holótipo BR, fragmento em G; isótipo, LE)."
**Accepted name and correct authority:** *Declieuxia lysimachioides* Zucc. in Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Serro Frio, s.d., *C.F.P. Martius* 634 (holotype, M [barcode M-0187396]; isotype G [fragment ex M; barcode G00177991]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 340:
"13-7. *Declieuxia oenanthioides* Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827. Tipo: Brasil, São Paulo, "prope Jundiahy", I/1818, *Martius* 984 (lectótipo M, escolhido por Kirkbride, 1976; isolectótipo M; fotos em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia oenanthoides* Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult. f.

**Correct name and authority:** *Declieuxia oenanthoides* Zucc. in Schult. & Schult. f., Mantissa ... Syst. Veg. 3: 112. 1827.

Type: BRAZIL. São Paulo: "prope Jundiahy", Jan. 1818, *C.F.P. Martius* 984 (M [barcode M0187392], neotype designated by Kirkbride (1976: 42); isotype M [barcode M0187391]; photos-M in NY).

**Notes:** Schultes and Schultes (1827: 111-113.) published 16 new species of *Declieuxia* from Brazil; they attributed the names of nine of them to Martius, and the other seven to Zuccarini. In the protologue of *D. oenanthoides* Mart. ex Zucc., it is stated "n. 6. Declieuxia oenanthoides* Mart.; herbacea, glabra; caule subsimplici; foliis quaternis, remotis, lineari-lanceolatis, acutis; racemis bifidis, paniculato-terminalibus. *Zucc. in litt.*" No locality, no collector, and no specimen are cited. At the end of each new species protologue, is the statement "Zucc. in Litt.", which signifies that the new species protologues were supplied by Zuccarini in a letter. Kirkbride (1976: 42) gave the authorship of *D. oenanthoides* as "Mart. & Zucc. ex Schult. & Schult." but this is not correct according to the current code. The authorship of the nine species attributed to Martius should be "Mart.", and the seven names attributed to Zuccarini should be "Zucc." (Art. 46.3 Ex. 15).

Schultes and Schultes did not see specimens of their new species. Therefore, the Schultes and Schultes herbarium at KW (Kyiv, Ukraine) has no bearing on the typification of these new *Declieuxia* names, and there cannot be any original material in KW of their *Declieuxia* names. Kirkbride (1976: 42) cited the type of

*D. oenanthoides* as "lectotype M, fragment G; isotype M". Since there is no original material, Kirkbride citation is here corrected to a designation of a neotype and an isotype at M, and an isotype fragment at G. Those specimens did not have barcode numbers when Kirkbride studied them. The specimen at M annotated by him as holotype, which is the neotype, has barcode number M0187392, and that at M annotated by him as isotype, which is an isotype, has barcode number M0187391.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 349:
"13-8. *Declieuxia pruinosa* Pohl ex DC., Prodr. 4: 481. 1830. - *Psyllocarpus pruinosus* Pohl ex DC., *in syn.*, Prodr. 4: 481. 1830. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, "inter Rio Jequitinhonha et Columbis", *Pohl* 3147 (holótipo G-DC; isótipos NY, W)."

**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia pruinosa* DC. (Art. 46.4).

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: "inter Rio Jequitinhonha et Columbis", s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl* 3147 (861d) (holotype G-DC [barcode G00666586]; isotypes NY [barcode 00131226], W [Acc. No. W0074506]).

**Notes:** Candolle (1830: 481) cited *Declieuxia pruinosa* Pohl ex DC. as "D. pruinosa (Pohl! in litt. sub Psyllocarpo)" and the material studied as "5 in Brasiliâ legit cl. Pohl. (v.s.)." The expression "v.s." (*vidi siccum*) means that he saw a specimen in his own herbarium (now G-DC). In G-DC there is a sole specimen associated with this name, with barcode 00666586. On the lower right corner of the sheet is pinned a label with the annotation "Psyllocarpus pruinosus Pohl!, Declieuxia--------- [pruinosa] DC." handwritten by Candolle. The specimen consists of a branch with several leaves and a terminal inflorescence, and next to it there is a small portion of a branch with two leaf pairs. At the base of these two branches is affixed a label with the annotation "Psyllocarpus pruinosus - Brésil, m. Pohl 1828" handwritten by an unknown author. This specimen is the holotype of *D. pruinosa*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 351:
"13-9. *Declieuxia verticillata* Muell. Arg., Flora 59(28): 438. 1876. Tipo: Brasil, Mato Grosso, in campis arenosis, Rio Pardo, X/1826, *Riedel* 599 (holótipo BR, fragmento em G; isótipo, LE)."
**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia verticillata* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Mato Grosso: in campis arenosis, Rio Pardo, Oct. 1826, *L. Riedel* 599 (BR [barcode 000000681315], lectotype designated by Kirkbride (1976: 75); isolectotype LE n.v.; isolectotype fragment G [ex BR; barcode G00177998]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1876a: 438) cited the material studied of *Declieuxia verticillata* Müll. Arg. as "St. Paul, ad Rio Pardo: Riedel n. 599" without citing the herbarium of deposit. Kirkbride (1976: 75) cited the type of this name as "*Riedel* 599 (holotype BR, fragment G; isotype LE)." According to the current *Code*, Kirkbride's citation should be treated as an inadvertent lectotype designation of the BR specimen. The BR specimen, barcode 000000681315, has a label with the heading "Ex herbario horti Petropolitani" and the handwritten annotation "111. No. 599. In campis arenosis R. Pardo. Octobr. 1826. Brasilia. Riedel" and the stamp "Herb. Hort. bruxell. - Coll. MARTII." Another label on this sheet has the annotation "Declieuxia verticillata Müll. Arg." handwritten by Müller Argoviensis.

14. **DIALYPETALANTHUS** Kuhlmann, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 363. 1925.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 354: "14-1. *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 363. 1925. Sintipos: Brasil, Pará: Serra de Santarém, 18/VIII/1916 (fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB*19038) (RB); Rio Tapajós, supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, 26/V/1923, *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (K, RB, US); Mato Grosso: Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, XII/1918, *Kuhlmann* 2363 (*RB* 15487); Salto Augusto, Rio Tapajóz, I/1915, *Kuhmann* 1514 (RB)."

**Accepted name:** *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann

Type: BRAZIL. Pará: Rio Tapajós, supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, "inter Itaituba et Villa Braga", "silva riparia non inundata, arvore pequena, petalas brancas, estames amarelos", 26 May 1923 (fl, fr), *A. Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (RB [2 sheets, barcodes 00538287, 00542242], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes, G [barcode G00357744], K [barcode K000173591], S [Acc. No. S05-1789], U [barcode U0001570], US [barcode 00624035]; photo-B [F0BN000954]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann, Kuhlmann (1925: 363-364) cited the material studied as "Habitat Serra de Santarém (nº 16.354 ex herb. Amaz.), Pará, legit A. Ducke, fructifer, 19.038 J. Bot. (18-VIII-1916); Rio Tapajós supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, Pará, legit A. Ducke, 17.921 (26-V-1923); Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, Matto Grosso, legit J.G. Kuhlmann (nº 2.363 Com. Rond.) 15.487 J. Bot., XII-1918; Salto Augusto, Tapajóz, legit J.G. Kuhmann, (1.514 Com. Rond.) Jan. 1915."

A search in Jstor Global Plants recovered the images of four original gatherings, which are below described and discussed.

A gathering from the state of Pará, Rio Tapajós, with the locality "inter Itaituba et Villa Braga", collected on 26 May 1923 (fl, fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (B†; G [barcode G00357744], K [barcode K000173591], RB [2 sheets, barcodes 00538287 (specimen label annotated by Kuhlmann), 00542242 (without specimen label)], S [Acc. No. S05-1789], U [barcode U0001570], US [barcode 00624035]; photo-B [F0BN000954]).

A gathering from the state of Pará, Serra de Santarém, collected on 18 August 1916 (fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB*19038) (*MG* 16354) (B†; RB [barcode 00538284]; fragment F [ex B, Acc. No. 606514]).

A gathering from the state of Mato Grosso, Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, collected on December 1918, *J.G. Kuhlmann* 2363 (*RB* 15487) (R [Acc. No. 14431, barcode R000014431], RB [Acc. No. RB15487, barcode 00538288]; fragment F [Acc. No. 654847]);

A gathering from the state of Mato Grosso, Salto Augusto, Rio Tapajóz, collected on January 1915, *J.G. Kuhlmann* 1514 (RB [2 sheets, Acc. No. 89710, barcodes 00542240, 00538286]).

The gathering *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921), from the Rio Tapajós, is distributed in numerous herbaria and consists of complete flowering and fruiting material. At RB there are two sheets of *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921). The sheet with barcode 00538287 has a label handwritten by Ducke and annotated by J.G. Kuhlmann. The other RB sheet, with barcode 00542242 does not have a specimen label. As the two sheets are kept together in the same folder, and a label is present only on the first sheet, they are here treated as a single specimen with multiple preparations, which is here designated as the lectotype of *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens*. The duplicates of *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) present in other herbaria are isolectotypes.

In addition, two gatherings with duplicates distributed in several herbaria are labeled as types, but they were collected after *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* was published. Those gatherings are not original material and are described below.
**Accepted name:** *Declieuxia verticillata* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Mato Grosso: in campis arenosis, Rio Pardo, Oct. 1826, *L. Riedel* 599 (BR [barcode 000000681315], lectotype designated by Kirkbride (1976: 75); isolectotype LE n.v.; isolectotype fragment G [ex BR; barcode G00177998]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1876a: 438) cited the material studied of *Declieuxia verticillata* Müll. Arg. as "St. Paul, ad Rio Pardo: Riedel n. 599" without citing the herbarium of deposit. Kirkbride (1976: 75) cited the type of this name as "*Riedel* 599 (holotype BR, fragment G; isotype LE)." According to the current *Code*, Kirkbride's citation should be treated as an inadvertent lectotype designation of the BR specimen. The BR specimen, barcode 000000681315, has a label with the heading "Ex herbario horti Petropolitani" and the handwritten annotation "111. No. 599. In campis arenosis R. Pardo. Octobr. 1826. Brasilia. Riedel" and the stamp "Herb. Hort. bruxell. - Coll. MARTII." Another label on this sheet has the annotation "Declieuxia verticillata Müll. Arg." handwritten by Müller Argoviensis.

14. **DIALYPETALANTHUS** Kuhlmann, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 363. 1925.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 354: "14-1. *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 363. 1925. Sintipos: Brasil, Pará: Serra de Santarém, 18/VIII/1916 (fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB*19038) (RB); Rio Tapajós, supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, 26/V/1923, *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (K, RB, US); Mato Grosso: Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, XII/1918, *Kuhlmann* 2363 (*RB* 15487); Salto Augusto, Rio Tapajóz, I/1915, *Kuhmann* 1514 (RB)."

**Accepted name:** *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann

Type: BRAZIL. Pará: Rio Tapajós, supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, "inter Itaituba et Villa Braga", "silva riparia non inundata, arvore pequena, petalas brancas, estames amarelos", 26 May 1923 (fl, fr), *A. Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (RB [2 sheets, barcodes 00538287, 00542242], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes, G [barcode G00357744], K [barcode K000173591], S [Acc. No. S05-1789], U [barcode U0001570], US [barcode 00624035]; photo-B [F0BN000954]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* Kuhlmann, Kuhlmann (1925: 363-364) cited the material studied as "Habitat Serra de Santarém (nº 16.354 ex herb. Amaz.), Pará, legit A. Ducke, fructifer, 19.038 J. Bot. (18-VIII-1916); Rio Tapajós supra Itaituba in vicinibus Barreirinhos, Pará, legit A. Ducke, 17.921 (26-V-1923); Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, Matto Grosso, legit J.G. Kuhlmann (nº 2.363 Com. Rond.) 15.487 J. Bot., XII-1918; Salto Augusto, Tapajóz, legit J.G. Kuhmann, (1.514 Com. Rond.) Jan. 1915."

A search in Jstor Global Plants recovered the images of four original gatherings, which are below described and discussed.

A gathering from the state of Pará, Rio Tapajós, with the locality "inter Itaituba et Villa Braga", collected on 26 May 1923 (fl, fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) (B†; G [barcode G00357744], K [barcode K000173591], RB [2 sheets, barcodes 00538287 (specimen label annotated by Kuhlmann), 00542242 (without specimen label)], S [Acc. No. S05-1789], U [barcode U0001570], US [barcode 00624035]; photo-B [F0BN000954]).

A gathering from the state of Pará, Serra de Santarém, collected on 18 August 1916 (fr), *Ducke s.n.* (*RB*19038) (*MG* 16354) (B†; RB [barcode 00538284]; fragment F [ex B, Acc. No. 606514]).

A gathering from the state of Mato Grosso, Santa Cruz, alto Jamary, collected on December 1918, *J.G. Kuhlmann* 2363 (*RB* 15487) (R [Acc. No. 14431, barcode R000014431], RB [Acc. No. RB15487, barcode 00538288]; fragment F [Acc. No. 654847]);

A gathering from the state of Mato Grosso, Salto Augusto, Rio Tapajóz, collected on January 1915, *J.G. Kuhlmann* 1514 (RB [2 sheets, Acc. No. 89710, barcodes 00542240, 00538286]).

The gathering *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921), from the Rio Tapajós, is distributed in numerous herbaria and consists of complete flowering and fruiting material. At RB there are two sheets of *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921). The sheet with barcode 00538287 has a label handwritten by Ducke and annotated by J.G. Kuhlmann. The other RB sheet, with barcode 00542242 does not have a specimen label. As the two sheets are kept together in the same folder, and a label is present only on the first sheet, they are here treated as a single specimen with multiple preparations, which is here designated as the lectotype of *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens*. The duplicates of *Ducke s.n.* (*RB* 17921) present in other herbaria are isolectotypes.

In addition, two gatherings with duplicates distributed in several herbaria are labeled as types, but they were collected after *Dialypetalanthus fuscescens* was published. Those gatherings are not original material and are described below.
A gathering from the state of Pará, Serra de SANTARÉM, 13 May 1927 (fl), *Ducke s.n.* (RB21684) (RB [3 sheets, Acc. No. RB21684, barcodes 00538285, 00542243, 00542244], S [Acc. No. S05-1787]).

A gathering from a plant cultivated in the Botanical Garden of Rio de Janeiro, “Culta in Horto Botânico Fluminis Januarii ex Pará ab A. Ducke traiecta”, 28 Jan. 1947 (fl, fr), P. Occhioni & C. Rizzini s.n. (RB57941) (L [2 sheets, barcodes L0001579, L0001580], S [Acc. No. S05-1785], U [barcode U0001571]).

15. **DIODELLA** (Torrey & A. Gray) J. K. Small, Fl. Miami 177. 1913.

*Hedyotis* sect. *Diodella*. J. Torrey & A. Gray, Fl. North Amer. 2: 41. 1841.

**Accepted genus name:** HEXASEPALUM Bartl. ex DC., Prodr. 4: 561. 1830.

**Notes:** Small (1913) segregated the genus *Diodela* Small from the genus *Diodia* L. and transferred only *Diodia rigida* Cham. & Schltdl. to *Diodella rigida* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Small. He distinguished *Diodela* from *Diodia* by the unbranched style, capitate and bilobed, and funnelform corollas, while in *Diodia* the styles are branched, with slender stigmatic lobes, and the corollas are salverform. The same year Small and Carter (1913) transferred another *Diodia* species to *Diodella*, with the new combination *Diodella teres* (Walter) Small. Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999) revised the species of *Diodia* and suggested that 16 *Diodia* species should be transferred to *Diodella*, but they did not publish the corresponding new combinations. Following their suggestion, Delprete (in Delprete et al. 2004; Delprete and Cortés-B. 2007; Delprete 2010a) transferred a few additional species from *Diodia* to *Diodella*. Cabaña Fader et al. (2016), after examining the type of *Hexasepalum angustifolium* Bartl. ex DC. concluded that it is synonymous with *Diodella crassifolia* (Benth.) Borhidi. They proposed that *Hexasepalum* and *H. angustifolium* be rejected to avoid the transfer of 11 names from *Diodella* to *Hexasepalum*. However, the nomenclature Committee of Vascular plants (Applequist 2013) did not recommend such a rejection. Kirkbride (2014) transferred *Diodella teres* (Walt.) Small to *Hexasepalum* and published the new combination *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H.Kirkbr. A year later, Kirkbride and Delprete (2015) transferred 10 specific names from *Diodella* to *Hexasepalum*. The four species of *Hexasepalum* occurring in the States of Goiás and Tocantins are treated below.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 362:

“15-1. **Diodella apiculata** (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Delprete in A. Reis (ed.), Fl. Ilustr. Catarinense RUBI, vol. 1: 169. 2004. - *Spermacoce apiculata* Willd. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 531. 1818. - *Diodia apiculata* (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) K. Schum., Bot. Jahrb. 10: 313. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, sem localidade, F.W. Sieber in Hoffmannsegg s.n. (holótipo, B-W 2626).”

**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum apiculatum* (Willd.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9(1): 104. 2015.

Type: BRAZIL: Without locality, s.d. [1804], F.W. Sieber in J.C. Hoffmannsegg s.n. (holotype, B-W [barcode B -W 02626 -01 0]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 367:

“15-2. **Diodella radula** (Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) Delprete in A. Reis (ed.), Fl. Ilustr. Catarinense RUBI, vol. 1: 174. 2004. - *Spermacoce radula* Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 531. 1818. - non *Spermacoce radula* Spreng., nom. superfl., Neue Entdeck. 2: 144. 1821.- *Diodia radula* (Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 342. 1828. Tipo: Brasil, Pará, [1801-1807], F.W. Sieber in Hoffmannsegg s.n. (holótipo, B-Willd).”

**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum radulum* (Willd.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9(1): 105. 2015.

Type: BRAZIL. Pará: Without locality, s.d. [1804], F.W. Sieber in J.C. Hoffmannsegg s.n. (holotype, B-W [barcode B -W 02625 -01 0]; possible isotype, HAL [barcode HAL0137348]).

**Notes:** A specimen at HAL, barcode HAL0137348, has a label with the handwritten annotation “Spermacoce radula e Bahia Brasilia, C. de Hoffmannsegg.” This specimen is a possible isotype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 370:

“15-3. **Diodella rosmarinifolia** (Pohl ex DC.) Bacigalupo & E.L. Cabral in Delprete & R. Cortés-B., Rev. Biol. Neotr. 3: 34. “2006” [2007]. - *Diodia rosmarinifolia* Pohl ex DC., Prodr. 4: 564. 1830; emend. K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 18. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, sem localidade, Pohl s.n. (holótipo G-DC).”
A gathering from the state of Pará, Serra de Santarém, 13 May 1927 (fl), *Ducke s.n.* (RB21684) (RB [3 sheets, Acc. No. RB21684, barcodes 00538285, 00542243, 00542244], S [Acc. No. S05-1787]).

A gathering from a plant cultivated in the Botanical Garden of Rio de Janeiro, “Culta in Horto Botanico Fluminis Januarii ex Pará ab A. Ducke traiecta”, 28 Jan. 1947 (fl, fr), *P. Occhioni & C. Rizzini s.n.* (RB57941) (L [2 sheets, barcodes L0001579, L0001580], S [Acc. No. S05-1785], U [barcode U0001571]).

15. **DIODELLA** (Torrey & A. Gray) J. K. Small, Fl. Miami 177. 1913.
*Hedyotis* sect. *Diodella*. J. Torrey & A. Gray, Fl. North Amer. 2: 41. 1841.

**Accepted genus name:** HEXASEPALUM Bartl. ex DC.,
Prodr. 4: 561. 1830.

**Notes:** Small (1913) segregated the genus *Diodela* Small from the genus *Diodia* L. and transferred only *Diodia rigida* Cham. & Schltdl. to *Diodella rigida* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Small. He distinguished *Diodela* from *Diodia* by the unbranched style, capitate and bilobed, and funnelform corollas, while in *Diodia* the styles are branched, with slender stigmatic lobes, and the corollas are salverform. The same year Small and Carter (1913) transferred another *Diodia* species to *Diodella*, with the new combination *Diodella teres* (Walter) Small. Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999) revised the species of *Diodia* and suggested that 16 *Diodia* species should be transferred to *Diodella*, but they did not publish the corresponding new combinations. Following their suggestion, Delprete (in Delprete et al. 2004; Delprete and Cortés-B. 2007; Delprete 2010a) transferred a few additional species from *Diodia* to *Diodella*. Cabaña Fader et al. (2016), after examining the type of *Hexasepalum angustifolium* Bartl. ex DC. concluded that it is synonymous with *Diodella crassifolia* (Benth.) Borhidi. They proposed that *Hexasepalum* and *H. angustifolium* be rejected to avoid the transfer of 11 names from *Diodella* to *Hexasepalum*. However, the nomenclature Committee of Vascular plants (Applequist 2013) did not recommend such a rejection. Kirkbride (2014) transferred *Diodella teres* (Walt.) Small to *Hexasepalum* and published the new combination *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H.Kirkbr. A year later, Kirkbride and Delprete (2015) transferred 10 specific names from *Diodella* to *Hexasepalum*. The four species of *Hexasepalum* occurring in the States of Goiás and Tocantins are treated below.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 362:

“15-1. **Diodella apiculata** (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) Delprete in A. Reis (ed.), Fl. Ilustr. Catarinense RUBI, vol. 1: 169. 2004. - *Spermacoce apiculata* Willd. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 531. 1818. - *Diodia apiculata* (Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.) K. Schum., Bot. Jahrb. 10: 313. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, sem localidade, *F.W. Sieber in Hoffmannsegg s.n.* (holótipo, B-W 2626).”

**Accepted name:** HEXASEPALUM apiculatum (Willd.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9(1): 104. 2015.

Type: BRAZIL: Without locality, s.d. [1804], *F.W. Sieber in J.C. Hoffmannsegg s.n.* (holotype, B-W [barcode B -W 02626 -01 0]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 367:

“15-2. **Diodella radula** (Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) Delprete in A. Reis (ed.), Fl. Ilustr. Catarinense RUBI, vol. 1: 174. 2004. - *Spermacoce radula* Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg. 3: 531. 1818. - non *Spermacoce radula* Spreng., nom. superfl., Neue Entdeck. 2: 144. 1821.- *Diodia radula* (Willd. & Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 342. 1828. Tipo: Brasil, Pará, [1801-1807], *F.W. Sieber in Hoffmannsegg s.n.* (holótipo, B-Willd).”

**Accepted name:** HEXASEPALUM radulum (Willd.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9(1): 105. 2015.

Type: BRAZIL. Pará: Without locality, s.d. [1804], *F.W. Sieber in J.C. Hoffmannsegg s.n.* (holotype, B-W [barcode B -W 02625 -01 0]; possible isotype, HAL [barcode HAL0137348]).

**Notes:** A specimen at HAL, barcode HAL0137348, has a label with the handwritten annotation “Spermacoce radula e Bahia Brasilia, C. de Hoffmannsegg.” This specimen is a possible isotype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 370:

“15-3. **Diodella rosmarinifolia** (Pohl ex DC.) Bacigalupo & E.L. Cabral in Delprete & R. Cortés-B., Rev. Biol. Neotr. 3: 34. “2006” [2007]. - *Diodia rosmarinifolia* Pohl ex DC., Prodr. 4: 564. 1830; emend. K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 18. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, sem localidade, *Pohl s.n.* (holótipo G-DC).”
**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H. Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 8(1): 17. 2014.

Type: BRAZIL: Without locality, s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl s.n.* (holotype, G-DC [barcode G00667314]).

**Notes:** In the protologue, Candolle (1830: 564) cited the name as "D. rosmarinifolia (Pohl! in litt.)" and the material studied as "in Brasiliâ detexit cl. Pohl [...] (v.s.)." The expression "v.s." (*vidi siccum*) means that he saw material in his own herbarium. There is a sole sheet associated with this name in G-DC, with barcode G00667314. On the lower right corner of the sheet is pinned a label with the annotation "Diodia rosmarinifolia Pohl" handwritten by Candolle. On the base of the specimen is glued a label with the annotation "Spermacoce v. Diodia rosmarinifolia, Brésil, m. Pohl 1828." The specimen consists of a plant with numerous leaf pairs, and numerous axillary inflorescences, and is the holotype of *D. rosmarinifolia*.

Delprete and Kirkbride (2015) published the new combination *Hexasepalum rosmarinifolium* (Pohl ex DC.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr. On the holotype specimen of *Diodia rosmarinifolia* is pinned a label with the annotation "Diodia teres Walt., N. Bacigalupo" handwritten by Bacigalupo in 1995. I agree with Bacigalupo's determination, and that *D. rosmarinifolia* should be treated as a synonym of *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H. Kirkbr. (see below).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 371:
"15-4. *Diodella teres* (Walt.) Small, Fl. Lancaster Co. 271. 1913. - *Diodia teres* Walt., Fl. Carol. 87. 1788. - *Spermacoce diodina* [Rich. in] Michx., Fl. Boreali Am. 1: 82. 1803. Tipo: USA: Carolina, "in aridis sabulosis Carolinae", s.d., *A. Michaux s.n.* (neótipo, P, escolhido por Fernald & Griscom, 1937)."

**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 8(1): 17. 2014.

Type: USA. South Carolina: Georgetown, old field, 24 Aug. 1939, *R.K. Godfrey & R.M. Tryon* 1682 (GH [barcode GH00277018], neotype designated by Ward (2008: 467); isoneotypes NY [barcode 00116396], US [barcode 001838313]).

**Notes:** For further information about the neotype designation of *Diodia teres* Walt., see Ward (2008).

16. **DIODIA** L., Sp. Pl. 104. 1753.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 377:
"16-1. *Diodia kuntzei* K. Schum., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 15. 1888. Tipo: Paraguai, Rio Paraguai, Asumpción, III/1875, *Balansa* 1750 (holótipo, B, destruído, foto em F; lectótipo, P, selecionado por Bacigalupo & Cabral, 1999, isolectótipo, BAF n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Diodia kuntzei* K.Schum.

Type: PARAGUAY: Bords du Rio Paraguay, à l'Assomption, Mar. 1875, *B. Balansa* 1750 (B†; first-step lectotype designated by Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999: 155), P [barcode P02088885], second-step lectotype designated by Cabral and Cabaña Fader (2022: 254); isolectotypes, BAF n.v., BR [barcode 000000530586], K [barcode K000470247 (annotated by Schumann)], P [2 sheets, barcodes P01817752, P02273039]; isolectotype fragment F [ex S, Acc. No. 630727]; photo-B (F0BN000865) in F).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Diodia kuntzei* K. Schum., Schumann (1888: 15-16) cited the gathering *Balansa* 1750. Schumann worked at B and the material that he studied in that institution was destroyed during WWII. Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999: 155) cited as lectotype of this name *Balansa* 1750 at P. However, at P there are three specimens of *Balansa* 1750, which are discussed below.

Specimen with barcode P01817752, consists of several plants and numerous persistent or detached fruits. The specimen label has the heading "B. Balansa. - Pl. du Paraguay. -1874-1877" and the annotation "Nº. 1750, Tiges radicants. Fleurs blanches. Bords du Rio Paraguay à l'Assomption. Mars 1875" handwritten by Balansa.

Specimen with barcode P02273039 is composed by a large clump of several branches and/or individuals, with several fruits. The label of this specimen has the same heading and the Balansa's annotations as the specimen with barcode P01817752.

Specimen with barcode P02088885 is composed of a single plant with several sparse branches and several fruits. The label of this specimen has the same heading as the specimen with barcode P01817752. This specimen was designated by Cabral and Cabaña Fader (2022: 254) as the lectotype of *Diodia kuntzei*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 381:
"16-2. *Diodia macrophylla* K. Schum., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 401. Tipo: Brasil, Tocantins, Natividade, "in arenosis
**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H. Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 8(1): 17. 2014.

Type: BRAZIL: Without locality, s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl s.n.* (holotype, G-DC [barcode G00667314]).

**Notes:** In the protologue, Candolle (1830: 564) cited the name as "D. rosmarinifolia (Pohl! in litt.)" and the material studied as "in Brasiliâ detexit cl. Pohl [...] (v.s.)." The expression "v.s." (*vidi siccum*) means that he saw material in his own herbarium. There is a sole sheet associated with this name in G-DC, with barcode G00667314. On the lower right corner of the sheet is pinned a label with the annotation "Diodia rosmarinifolia Pohl" handwritten by Candolle. On the base of the specimen is glued a label with the annotation "Spermacoce v. Diodia rosmarinifolia, Brésil, m. Pohl 1828." The specimen consists of a plant with numerous leaf pairs, and numerous axillary inflorescences, and is the holotype of *D. rosmarinifolia*.

Delprete and Kirkbride (2015) published the new combination *Hexasepalum rosmarinifolium* (Pohl ex DC.) Delprete & J.H.Kirkbr. On the holotype specimen of *Diodia rosmarinifolia* is pinned a label with the annotation "Diodia teres Walt., N. Bacigalupo" handwritten by Bacigalupo in 1995. I agree with Bacigalupo's determination, and that *D. rosmarinifolia* should be treated as a synonym of *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H. Kirkbr. (see below).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 371:
"15-4. *Diodella teres* (Walt.) Small, Fl. Lancaster Co. 271. 1913. - *Diodia teres* Walt., Fl. Carol. 87. 1788. - *Spermacoce diodina* [Rich. in] Michx., Fl. Boreali Am. 1: 82. 1803. Tipo: USA: Carolina, "in aridis sabulosis Carolinae", s.d., *A. Michaux s.n.* (neótipo, P, escolhido por Fernald & Griscom, 1937)."

**Accepted name:** *Hexasepalum teres* (Walt.) J.H.Kirkbr., J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 8(1): 17. 2014.

Type: USA. South Carolina: Georgetown, old field, 24 Aug. 1939, *R.K. Godfrey & R.M. Tryon* 1682 (GH [barcode GH00277018], prototype designated by Ward (2008: 467); isoneotypes NY [barcode 00116396], US [barcode 001838313]).

**Notes:** For further information about the neotype designation of *Diodia teres* Walt., see Ward (2008).

16. **DIODIA** L., Sp. Pl. 104. 1753.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 377:
"16-1. *Diodia kuntzei* K. Schum., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 15. 1888. Tipo: Paraguai, Rio Paraguai, Asumpción, III/1875, *Balansa* 1750 (holótipo, B, destruído, foto em F; lectótipo, P, selecionado por Bacigalupo & Cabral, 1999, isolectótipo, BAF n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Diodia kuntzei* K.Schum.

Type: PARAGUAY: Bords du Rio Paraguay, à l'Assomption, Mar. 1875, *B. Balansa* 1750 (B†; first-step lectotype designated by Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999: 155), P [barcode P02088885], second-step lectotype designated by Cabral and Cabaña Fader (2022: 254); isolectotypes, BAF n.v., BR [barcode 000000530586], K [barcode K000470247 (annotated by Schumann)], P [2 sheets, barcodes P01817752, P02273039]; isolectotype fragment F [ex S, Acc. No. 630727]; photo-B (F0BN000865) in F).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Diodia kuntzei* K. Schum., Schumann (1888: 15-16) cited the gathering *Balansa* 1750. Schumann worked at B and the material that he studied in that institution was destroyed during WWII. Bacigalupo and Cabral (1999: 155) cited as lectotype of this name *Balansa* 1750 at P. However, at P there are three specimens of *Balansa* 1750, which are discussed below.

Specimen with barcode P01817752, consists of several plants and numerous persistent or detached fruits. The specimen label has the heading "B. Balansa. - Pl. du Paraguay. -1874-1877" and the annotation "Nº. 1750, Tiges radicants. Fleurs blanches. Bords du Rio Paraguay à l'Assomption. Mars 1875" handwritten by Balansa.

Specimen with barcode P02273039 is composed by a large clump of several branches and/or individuals, with several fruits. The label of this specimen has the same heading and the Balansa's annotations as the specimen with barcode P01817752.

Specimen with barcode P02088885 is composed of a single plant with several sparse branches and several fruits. The label of this specimen has the same heading as the specimen with barcode P01817752. This specimen was designated by Cabral and Cabaña Fader (2022: 254) as the lectotype of *Diodia kuntzei*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 381:
"16-2. *Diodia macrophylla* K. Schum., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 401. Tipo: Brasil, Tocantins, Natividade, "in arenosis
umbrosis humidis prov. Goyaz" I/1843 (fl, fr), Gardner
3243 (holótipo B, destruído, foto F 863 em NY; lectótipo,
BM, selecionado por Bacigalupo & Cabral, 1999,
isolectótipos, G n.v., P)."

**Accepted name:** *Diodia macrophylla* K.Schum.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Natividade, “in arenosis
umbrosis humidis prov. Goyaz”, Jan. 1843 (fl, fr),
G. Gardner 3243 (holotype, B†; lectotype, BM [bar-
code 000053635, “Banks of streams near Natividade,
Prov. of Goyaz, Jan. 1840”], designated by Baciga-
lupo and Cabral (1999: 157); isolectotypes, E [bar-
code E00504643], G [2 sheets, barcodes G00424910,
G00424911], K [barcode K000470245], P [2 sheets,
barcodes P01817868, P01817869], W [2 sheets, Acc.
Nos. 113609, W0028726]; isolectotype fragment F
[ex B, Acc. No. 605965]; photo-B (F 863) in F, NY).

17. **DUROIA** L. f., Suppl. 30, 209. 1782 *nom. cons.*

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 385:
"17-1. *Duroia prancei* Steyerm., New York Bot. Gard. 23: 345. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Mato Grosso, Serra do Roncador, Rio Sete de Setembro, várzea forest, 3 km from Garapu, 2/X/1964 (fl), *Prance et al. 59234* (holótipo, NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Duroia prancei* Steyerm.

Type: BRAZIL. Mato Grosso: Serra do Roncador, varzea forest beside Rio Sete de Setembro, 3 km from Garapu, 2 Oct. 1964 (fl), G.T. Prance, N.T. Silva & J.M. Pires 59234 (holotype, NY [barcode 00131282]; isotypes COL [COL000004586], F [Acc. No. 1680812], GH [barcode 00092674], K [barcode K000424446], US [barcode 00138138], VEN [Acc. No. 80469]).

18. **EMMEORHIZA** Endl., Gen. Pl. 1: 565. 1838.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 390:
"18-1. *Emmeorhiza umbellata* (Spreng.) K. Schum. in
Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 408. 1888. - *Borreria umbellata*
Spreng., Neue Entd. 2: 144. 1821. - *Endlichera umbel-
lata* K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 38, pl. 74. 1888.
Tipo: Brasil tropical, *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído;
lectótipo, K)."

**Accepted name:** *Emmeorhiza umbellata* (Spreng.)
K.Schum.

Type: BRAZIL: “Bras. aeq.”, s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (HAL
[barcode HAL0113631], **lectotype here designated**;
**isolectotype K** [barcode K000016365]).

**Notes:** Sprengel (1821: 144) described *Borreria umbellata* Spreng. and only cited "Habitat in Brasilia" without indicating the locality, collector, collection number or herbarium of deposit.

Delprete (2010a: 390) cited as lectotype a specimen
of *Sellow s.n.* at K. Such lectotypification is not valid
because after 2001 it should have been accompanied by
“here designated” or a similar expression. According to
Stafleu and Cowan (1985: 806) “Kurt Sprengel’s consid-
erable and rich herbarium came first to his son Anton.
After the latter’s death, in 1851, it was sold in parts. [...]
A certain number of families and genera were sold to
specialists [...] Even after this rigorous impoverishment a
considerable portion remained and was acquired in 1853
by Karl Müller in Halle. The Müller-Sprengel herbarium
(12.000 species) was bought by Berlin (B) in 1890, and
is no longer extant. [...]” According Stafleu and Cowan
(1985: 806) “a certain number of specimens are at B-W,
BP, FI, G, GOET (Lich.), H-Ach (lich.), L (mushi and
algae), LD (200, herb. Retzius), LE, PH, PR.” Several spec-
imens are possible original material of *Borreria umbella-
ta*, which are described and discussed below.

A specimen at MO, with Accession No. 124104, has a
label with the annotation “Bahia, in fruticetis – Machao-
nia brasiliensis DC.!” handwritten by an unknown
author. This specimen was collected by Philipp Salz-
mann, who collected in Brazil during 1827–1830. There-
fore, this specimen cannot be original material, as it was
gathered after the publication of *Borreria umbellata*.

A specimen at K, with barcode K000016365, has sev-
eral labels. One label has the heading “isotype” and “Bor-
reria umbellata Sprengel” handwritten by Steyermark.
A printed label saying “Brasilia. Reliquiae d. Sello. and
the stamp “15 Nov 1907”. A second label with the head-
ing “Ex Museo botanico Berolinensi”, the printed text
“Brasilia, leg. Sellow”, the stamp “15 NOV 1907” and the
handwritten text “Emmeorrhiza umbellata K. Schum.” A
fourth label has the annotation “Emmeorrhiza umbellata
(Spr.) Schum. subsp. umbellata, det. Julian A. Steyermark
1968.” Because Friedrich Sellow collected in Brazil dur-
ing 1814–1831, this specimen could have been collected
before the publication date of of *B. umbellata*.

A specimen at HBG, with barcode HBG-506629,
also has several labels. A label with the heading "Her-
barium Hamburgense, P. Magnus acc, Febr. 1918", the
stamp "TYPUS" and the handwritten text "Borreria
umbellata Spreng. ≡ Emmeorhiza umbellata (Spreng.)
K. Schum., leg. P. Salzmann, Brazil." A second label has
umbrosis humidis prov. Goyaz" I/1843 (fl, fr), Gardner
3243 (holótipo B, destruído, foto F 863 em NY; lectótipo,
BM, selecionado por Bacigalupo & Cabral, 1999,
isolectótipos, G n.v., P)."

Accepted name: *Diodia macrophylla* K.Schum.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Natividade, “in arenosis
umbrosis humidis prov. Goyaz”, Jan. 1843 (fl, fr),
G. Gardner 3243 (holotype, B†; lectotype, BM [bar-
code 000053635, “Banks of streams near Natividade,
Prov. of Goyaz, Jan. 1840”], designated by Baciga-
lupo and Cabral (1999: 157); isolectotypes, E [bar-
code E00504643], G [2 sheets, barcodes G00424910,
G00424911], K [barcode K000470245], P [2 sheets,
barcodes P01817868, P01817869], W [2 sheets, Acc.
Nos. 113609, W0028726]; isolectotype fragment F
[ex B, Acc. No. 605965]; photo-B (F 863) in F, NY).

17. **DUROIA** L. f., Suppl. 30, 209. 1782 *nom. cons.*

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 385:
"17-1. *Duroia prancei* Steyerm., New York Bot. Gard. 23: 345. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Mato Grosso, Serra do Roncador, Rio Sete de Setembro, várzea forest, 3 km from Garapu, 2/X/1964 (fl), *Prance et al. 59234* (holótipo, NY)."

Accepted name: *Duroia prancei* Steyerm.

Type: BRAZIL. Mato Grosso: Serra do Roncador, varzea forest beside Rio Sete de Setembro, 3 km from Garapu, 2 Oct. 1964 (fl), G.T. Prance, N.T. Silva & J.M. Pires 59234 (holotype, NY [barcode 00131282]; isotypes COL [COL000004586], F [Acc. No. 1680812], GH [barcode 00092674], K [barcode K000424446], US [barcode 00138138], VEN [Acc. No. 80469]).

18. **EMMEORHIZA** Endl., Gen. Pl. 1: 565. 1838.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 390:
"18-1. *Emmeorhiza umbellata* (Spreng.) K. Schum. in
Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 408. 1888. - *Borreria umbellata*
Spreng., Neue Entd. 2: 144. 1821. - *Endlichera umbel-
lata* K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 38, pl. 74. 1888.
Tipo: Brasil tropical, *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído;
lectótipo, K)."

Accepted name: *Emmeorhiza umbellata* (Spreng.)
K.Schum.

Type: BRAZIL: “Bras. aeq.”, s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (HAL
[barcode HAL0113631], **lectotype here designated**;
**isolectotype K** [barcode K000016365]).

Notes: Sprengel (1821: 144) described *Borreria umbellata* Spreng. and only cited "Habitat in Brasilia" without indicating the locality, collector, collection number or herbarium of deposit.

Delprete (2010a: 390) cited as lectotype a specimen
of *Sellow s.n.* at K. Such lectotypification is not valid
because after 2001 it should have been accompanied by
"here designated" or a similar expression. According to
Stafleu and Cowan (1985: 806) "Kurt Sprengel's consid-
erable and rich herbarium came first to his son Anton.
After the latter's death, in 1851, it was sold in parts. [...]
A certain number of families and genera were sold to
specialists [...] Even after this rigorous impoverishment a
considerable portion remained and was acquired in 1853
by Karl Müller in Halle. The Müller-Sprengel herbarium
(12.000 species) was bought by Berlin (B) in 1890, and
is no longer extant. [...]" According Stafleu and Cowan
(1985: 806) "a certain number of specimens are at B-W,
BP, FI, G, GOET (Lich.), H-Ach (lich.), L (mushi and
algae), LD (200, herb. Retzius), LE, PH, PR." Several spec-
imens are possible original material of *Borreria umbella-
ta*, which are described and discussed below.

A specimen at MO, with Accession No. 124104, has a
label with the annotation “Bahia, in fruticetis – Machao-
nia brasiliensis DC.!” handwritten by an unknown
author. This specimen was collected by Philipp Salz-
mann, who collected in Brazil during 1827–1830. There-
fore, this specimen cannot be original material, as it was
gathered after the publication of *Borreria umbellata*.

A specimen at K, with barcode K000016365, has sev-
eral labels. One label has the heading “isotype” and “Bor-
reria umbellata Sprengel” handwritten by Steyermark.
A printed label saying “Brasilia. Reliquiae d. Sello. and
the stamp “15 Nov 1907”. A second label with the head-
ing “Ex Museo botanico Berolinensi”, the printed text
“Brasilia, leg. Sellow”, the stamp “15 NOV 1907” and the
handwritten text “Emmeorrhiza umbellata K. Schum.” A
fourth label has the annotation “Emmeorrhiza umbellata
(Spr.) Schum. subsp. umbellata, det. Julian A. Steyermark
1968.” Because Friedrich Sellow collected in Brazil dur-
ing 1814–1831, this specimen could have been collected
before the publication date of of *B. umbellata*.

A specimen at HBG, with barcode HBG-506629,
also has several labels. A label with the heading "Her-
barium Hamburgense, P. Magnus acc, Febr. 1918", the
stamp "TYPUS" and the handwritten text "Borreria
umbellata Spreng. ≡ Emmeorhiza umbellata (Spreng.)
K. Schum., leg. P. Salzmann, Brazil." A second label has
the stamp "Université de Montpellier – Institut de Botanique", the watermark "ex herb. P. Magnus" and the handwritten text (author unknown) "Emeorhiza brasiliensis Walp., = Machaonia ________ Salzm. herb (et DC pro parte), Bahia (Brésil) in sepibus, Salzmann."

A specimen at HAL, with barcode HAL0113631, has a label with the handwritten annotation "Borria umbellata Spr., Sellow, Bras. aeq." and the stamp "TYPUS". The specimen also has a recently printed label saying "Herbarium Universitatis Halensis, Borria umbellata Spreng., Neue Entdeck. Pflanzenk. 2: 144 (1821), Brazil; Brasilia aeq., ex herb. Berol. leg. F. Sellow, am: 1814-1831."

Both K and HAL specimens are original material of *Borreria umbellata* because they were both collected by Sellow and were both transferred from B. The HAL specimen with barcode HAL0113631 is here designated the lectotype of this name.

19. **FARAMEA** Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane, 102, 3: pl. 40. 1775.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 398:
"19-1. *Faramea bracteata* Benth., Linnaea 23: 452. 1850. Tipo: Tocantins ["Goyaz"], Natividade, [X/1839 - II/1940], *Gardner 3220* (holótipo, K)."

Accepted name: *Faramea bracteata* Benth.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Near Natividade, Oct. 1839, G. *Gardner 3220* (K [barcode K000432789], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes BM [barcode BM000901257], G [barcode G00301049], K [barcode K000432790], P [barcode P00836803]; isotype frament F [ex G; Acc. No. 767094]).

**Notes:** Bentham (1850: 452) cited the material studied of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. as "Prov. Goyaz, Gardner n. 3220" but did not cite the herbarium of deposit. Bentham worked at K and also examined specimens from BM. Delprete (2010a: 398) cited the holotype of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. a specimen at K. However, three specimens of *Gardner 3220* are in BM and K, which are discussed below.

A BM specimen, with barcode BM000901257, has the handwritten label "Herb. Gardner". On the sheet is handwritten "3220. roads near Natividade, Province of Goyaz. Oct. 1839, a shrub 6 feet high."

One K specimen, with barcode K000432790, has the stamp "Herbarium Hookerianum, 1867" and handwritten on the sheet "Gardner, Goyaz". The specimen label

has the handwritten annotation "3220. Rubiaceae. A shrub two m high, road Natividade, bracts pure white – Oct 1839." On the lower left corner are pencil sketches of the dissected ovary, the calyx, and lateral and dorsal views of the seeds.

The second K specimen, with barcode K000432789, has the stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum, 1854" and the label with the printed text "Prov. Goyaz, Brasilia tropica, Gardner, 1841." and the handwritten annotation "3220 Coffea?" This specimen is here designated the lectotype of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. The fact that the stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum" bears the date "1854", a date posterior to the publication of the name, only means that it was integrated in K that year, but it does not exclude that it was available to Bentham before the publication of the name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 403:
"19-2. *Faramea multiflora* A. Rich. in DC., Prodr. 4: 497. IX/1830 [reimp. A. Rich., Mém. Fam. Rubiaceé. 96. XII/1830; reimpr. Mem. Soc. Hist. Nat. Paris 5: 176: 1834]. - *Coussarea multiflora* (A. Rich. in DC.) Lemée, Fl. Guy. Franç. 3: 542. 1953. Tipo: Guiana Francesa, L.C.M. *Richard s.n.* (holótipo, P, isótipo G-DC n.v., foto em MO)."

Accepted name: *Faramea multiflora* A.Rich. ex DC.

Type: FRENCH GUIANA: "in sylvis ad Montem Ynéri", s.d., *L.C.M. Richard s.n.* (P [barcode P00836846], lectotype designated Jardim in Taylor and Jardim (2020: 121); possible isolectotype P [barcode P00836845]).

**Notes:** The original specimen of *Faramea multiflora* A.Rich. ex DC. in P, with barcode P00836846, consists of a large branch with several leaves and a terminal infructescence with several mature fruits. On the sheet are affixed two labels on the bottom left corner. The lower one has the annotation "Coffea paniculata Aubl. t. 58." handwritten by an unknown author, and the remainder of the label has the annotation "frutex 4-6-ped. erectus, ramis oppos. patentib. remotis, cylindricis, levibus. - Panicula fructifera coerulescens. - Fructus immaturi subceruleoa-viridescentis, sub 2-dydimo-globosi - pericarpio exsucco, 1-locul. 1-spe. - Julio, in sylvis ad Montem Ynéri" probably handwritten by L.C.M. Richard. At the bottom of the label is handwritten in red ink "L. Cl. Richard Herbarium Guyanens-Antilleanum." Another label, affixed above the previous annotation, has the following explanation "Il est evident que
the stamp "Université de Montpellier – Institut de Botanique", the watermark "ex herb. P. Magnus" and the handwritten text (author unknown) "Emeorhiza brasiliensis Walp., = Machaonia ________ Salzm. herb (et DC pro parte), Bahia (Brésil) in sepibus, Salzmann."

A specimen at HAL, with barcode HAL0113631, has a label with the handwritten annotation "Borria umbellata Spr., Sellow, Bras. aeq." and the stamp "TYPUS". The specimen also has a recently printed label saying "Herbarium Universitatis Halensis, Borria umbellata Spreng., Neue Entdeck. Pflanzenk. 2: 144 (1821), Brazil; Brasilia aeq., ex herb. Berol. leg. F. Sellow, am: 1814-1831."

Both K and HAL specimens are original material of *Borreria umbellata* because they were both collected by Sellow and were both transferred from B. The HAL specimen with barcode HAL0113631 is here designated the lectotype of this name.

19. **FARAMEA** Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane, 102, 3: pl. 40. 1775.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 398:
"19-1. *Faramea bracteata* Benth., Linnaea 23: 452. 1850. Tipo: Tocantins ["Goyaz"], Natividade, [X/1839 - II/1940], *Gardner 3220* (holótipo, K)."

Accepted name: *Faramea bracteata* Benth.

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: Near Natividade, Oct. 1839, G. Gardner 3220 (K [barcode K000432789], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes BM [barcode BM000901257], G [barcode G00301049], K [barcode K000432790], P [barcode P00836803]; isotype frament F [ex G; Acc. No. 767094]).

**Notes:** Bentham (1850: 452) cited the material studied of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. as "Prov. Goyaz, Gardner n. 3220" but did not cite the herbarium of deposit. Bentham worked at K and also examined specimens from BM. Delprete (2010a: 398) cited the holotype of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. a specimen at K. However, three specimens of *Gardner 3220* are in BM and K, which are discussed below.

A BM specimen, with barcode BM000901257, has the handwritten label "Herb. Gardner". On the sheet is handwritten "3220. roads near Natividade, Province of Goyaz. Oct. 1839, a shrub 6 feet high."

One K specimen, with barcode K000432790, has the stamp "Herbarium Hookerianum, 1867" and handwritten on the sheet "Gardner, Goyaz". The specimen label

has the handwritten annotation "3220. Rubiaceae. A shrub two m high, road Natividade, bracts pure white – Oct 1839." On the lower left corner are pencil sketches of the dissected ovary, the calyx, and lateral and dorsal views of the seeds.

The second K specimen, with barcode K000432789, has the stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum, 1854" and the label with the printed text "Prov. Goyaz, Brasilia tropica, Gardner, 1841." and the handwritten annotation "3220 Coffea?" This specimen is here designated the lectotype of *Faramea bracteata* Benth. The fact that the stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum" bears the date "1854", a date posterior to the publication of the name, only means that it was integrated in K that year, but it does not exclude that it was available to Bentham before the publication of the name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 403:
"19-2. *Faramea multiflora* A. Rich. in DC., Prodr. 4: 497. IX/1830 [reimp. A. Rich., Mém. Fam. Rubiaceé. 96. XII/1830; reimpr. Mem. Soc. Hist. Nat. Paris 5: 176: 1834]. - *Coussarea multiflora* (A. Rich. in DC.) Lemée, Fl. Guy. Franç. 3: 542. 1953. Tipo: Guiana Francesa, L.C.M. *Richard s.n.* (holótipo, P, isótipo G-DC n.v., foto em MO)."

Accepted name: *Faramea multiflora* A.Rich. ex DC.

Type: FRENCH GUIANA: "in sylvis ad Montem Ynéri", s.d., *L.C.M. Richard s.n.* (P [barcode P00836846], lectotype designated Jardim in Taylor and Jardim (2020: 121); possible isolectotype P [barcode P00836845]).

**Notes:** The original specimen of *Faramea multiflora* A.Rich. ex DC. in P, with barcode P00836846, consists of a large branch with several leaves and a terminal infructescence with several mature fruits. On the sheet are affixed two labels on the bottom left corner. The lower one has the annotation "Coffea paniculata Aubl. t. 58." handwritten by an unknown author, and the remainder of the label has the annotation "frutex 4-6-ped. erectus, ramis oppos. patentib. remotis, cylindricis, levibus. - Panicula fructifera coerulescens. - Fructus immaturi subceruleoa-viridescentis, sub 2-dydimo-globosi - pericarpio exsucco, 1-locul. 1-spe. - Julio, in sylvis ad Montem Ynéri" probably handwritten by L.C.M. Richard. At the bottom of the label is handwritten in red ink "L. Cl. Richard Herbarium Guyanens-Antilleanum." Another label, affixed above the previous annotation, has the following explanation "Il est evident que
ceci est: Faramea multiflora A. Rich. – Ce n’est nulle-
ment Coffea paniculata Aubl. t. 58, par contre la plante
cadre parfaitement avec le peu de mots que A. Rich. en
donne de son Far. ∞-flora [multiflora], in Mem. soc. h.
n. Paris 5. p. 176. [...]." (It is evident that this [specimen]
is Faramea multiflora A. Rich. – It is not Coffea panicu-
lata Aubl. t. 58, on the other hand the plant corresponds
perfectly to the few words that A. Rich. offers for for
his Far. ∞-flora [multiflora], in Mem. soc. h. n. Paris 5.
p. 176. [...] On the lower right corner there is a label
with the printed heading "Herb. Mus. Paris" and the
lower portion also printed "Louis Claude Richard. Her-
barium Guyanensis-Antillanum." In the middle of the
label is handwritten "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. var.
epedunculata Stey. – det. J.A. Steyermark, 1970." Above
that label is another label with "Type" printed in red ink,
and the handwritten annotation "Faramea multiflora A.
Rich. ex DC. – ! J. Jardim, fev. 2007." This specimen was
designated as the lectotype of *Faramea multiflora* by Jar-
dim (in Taylor & Jardim 2020: 121).

A second specimen in P, with barcode P00836845,
has four labels affixed on it. One of them has the anno-
tation "Faramea multiflora Cl. Rich." handwritten by an
unknown author. A second label has the annotation "L.
Cl. Richard. Herb. Guyan.-Antillarum" and "coffea pan-
iculata" handwritten in red ink, and "Faramea? frutex
3-6 pedalis - ramis oppos. patent. frictuis [?], fl. dilute
caerulescentes, in opacis Sylvis Coutiantes [?]" handwrit-
ten in black ink. A third label, affixed on the lower right
corner of the sheet, has the printed heading "Herb. Mus.
Paris." and the printed annotation "Louis Claude Rich-
ard. Herbarium Guyanensi-Antillanum." On the third
label is the annotation "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. var.
epedunculata Stey. det. J.A. Steyermark 1970." On the
sheet are affixed one flowering branch with several flow-
ers and one fruiting branch with two fruits. Although
Steyermark annotated this specimen as "var. epedun-
culata" the inflorescence and infructescence of the two
branches are obviously pedunculate. The fourth label has
the annotation "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. ex DC., ! J.
Jardim, fev. 2007." This specimen is a possible isolecto-
type of *Faramea multiflora*.

There is no original material of *Faramea multiflora*
in G-DC.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 409:
"19-3. **Faramea nitida** Benth., Linnaea 23: 454. 1850.
Tipo: Brasil, Ceará, near Crato, Gardner 1695 (lectótipo,
K, aqui escolhido; isótipo K [ex herb. Hook.], foto em
NY). Parátipo: Maranhão, Gardner 6037 (K)."

Accepted name: *Faramea nitida* Benth.

Type: BRAZIL. Ceará: Road near Crato, Oct. 1838,
G. Gardner 1693 (first-step lectotype designated
by Delprete (2010a: 409); K [barcode K000015387],
**second-step lectotype here designated**; isolecto-
types, BR [barcode 000000530596], F [Acc. No.
767842], G [2 sheets, barcode G00301030], GH [bar-
code 00092711], K [2 sheets, barcodes K000012327,
K000012328], P [3 sheets, barcodes P00836869,
P00836870, P00836871], S [Acc. No. S05-1560]).

Notes: Bentham (1850: 454) along with the descrip-
tion of *Faramea nitida* Benth., cited the material studied
as "Prov. Cearà, Gardn. [Gardner] n. 1695, et ut videtur
eadam Maranham, Gardn. [Gardner] n. 6037."

Delprete (2010a: 409) designated as lectotype of this
name a specimen of *Gardner 1695* at K. He followed
Bentham's citation as "*Gardner 1695*" but the orig-
nal gathering of *Faramea nitida* studied by Bentham is
*Gardner 1693* instead. According to Art. 9 of the *Code*,
this is a correctable error. Also, Delprete cited one speci-
men of *Gardner 1693* (as "*1695*") at K as lectotype, and
another specimen with the same collection number at
K, with the stamp "Herb. Hook." as the isolectotype. At
K there are three specimens of *Gardner 1693*, which are
discussed below.

The K specimen with barcode K000015387, is com-
posed of two flowering branches, with three labels, and
is without any stamp indicating either Bentham's or
Hooker's herbarium. The label at the bottom right corner
has the handwritten number "1693" and the printed text
"Gardner, Piahuy, Goyaz, &c., Coll. 1837-41, Brazil." The
label has the penciled annotation "1686. Cinchonaceae"
beside it. Above the two labels, there is another hand-
written label bearing "Ceará, Gardner 1693, Type, Fara-
mea nitida Benth., Det. Zappi, 9/1998."

The K specimen with barcode K000012328, is com-
posed of two flowering branches, and the sheet bears
the stamp "Herbarium Hookerianum, 1867." The anno-
tation "Brazil, Gardner 1839" is handwritten directly on
the sheet (author unknown). At the lower right corner
is affixed a label handwritten by Gardner saying "1693.
Cinchonaceae sp. [...] a genus intermediate between Ixo-
ra and Faramea. A shrub about a foot high. Flowers pure
white and highly odoriferous. [...] road near Crato. Oct.
1838." This is the specimen cited by Delprete (2010a:
409) as the isolectotype (as "isótipo") at K.

The K specimen with barcode K000012327, is com-
posed of a single sterile branch, and the sheet bears the
stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum, 1854." This speci-
men has a label with the printed text "Brasilia tropica,
ceci est: Faramea multiflora A. Rich. – Ce n’est nulle-
ment Coffea paniculata Aubl. t. 58, par contre la plante
cadre parfaitement avec le peu de mots que A. Rich. en
donne de son Far. ∞-flora [multiflora], in Mem. soc. h.
n. Paris 5. p. 176. [...]." (It is evident that this [specimen]
is Faramea multiflora A. Rich. – It is not Coffea panicu-
lata Aubl. t. 58, on the other hand the plant corresponds
perfectly to the few words that A. Rich. offers for for
his Far. ∞-flora [multiflora], in Mem. soc. h. n. Paris 5.
p. 176. [...] On the lower right corner there is a label
with the printed heading "Herb. Mus. Paris" and the
lower portion also printed "Louis Claude Richard. Her-
barium Guyanensis-Antillanum." In the middle of the
label is handwritten "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. var.
epedunculata Stey. – det. J.A. Steyermark, 1970." Above
that label is another label with "Type" printed in red ink,
and the handwritten annotation "Faramea multiflora A.
Rich. ex DC. – ! J. Jardim, fev. 2007." This specimen was
designated as the lectotype of *Faramea multiflora* by Jar-
dim (in Taylor & Jardim 2020: 121).

A second specimen in P, with barcode P00836845,
has four labels affixed on it. One of them has the anno-
tation "Faramea multiflora Cl. Rich." handwritten by an
unknown author. A second label has the annotation "L.
Cl. Richard. Herb. Guyan.-Antillarum" and "coffea pan-
iculata" handwritten in red ink, and "Faramea? frutex
3-6 pedalis - ramis oppos. patent. frictuis [?], fl. dilute
caerulescentes, in opacis Sylvis Coutiantes [?]" handwrit-
ten in black ink. A third label, affixed on the lower right
corner of the sheet, has the printed heading "Herb. Mus.
Paris." and the printed annotation "Louis Claude Rich-
ard. Herbarium Guyanensi-Antillanum." On the third
label is the annotation "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. var.
epedunculata Stey. det. J.A. Steyermark 1970." On the
sheet are affixed one flowering branch with several flow-
ers and one fruiting branch with two fruits. Although
Steyermark annotated this specimen as "var. epedun-
culata" the inflorescence and infructescence of the two
branches are obviously pedunculate. The fourth label has
the annotation "Faramea multiflora A. Rich. ex DC., ! J.
Jardim, fev. 2007." This specimen is a possible isolecto-
type of *Faramea multiflora*.

There is no original material of *Faramea multiflora*
in G-DC.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 409:
"19-3. **Faramea nitida** Benth., Linnaea 23: 454. 1850.
Tipo: Brasil, Ceará, near Crato, Gardner 1695 (lectótipo,
K, aqui escolhido; isótipo K [ex herb. Hook.], foto em
NY). Parátipo: Maranhão, Gardner 6037 (K)."

Accepted name: *Faramea nitida* Benth.

Type: BRAZIL. Ceará: Road near Crato, Oct. 1838,
G. Gardner 1693 (first-step lectotype designated
by Delprete (2010a: 409); K [barcode K000015387],
**second-step lectotype here designated**; isolecto-
types, BR [barcode 000000530596], F [Acc. No.
767842], G [2 sheets, barcode G00301030], GH [bar-
code 00092711], K [2 sheets, barcodes K000012327,
K000012328], P [3 sheets, barcodes P00836869,
P00836870, P00836871], S [Acc. No. S05-1560]).

Notes: Bentham (1850: 454) along with the descrip-
tion of *Faramea nitida* Benth., cited the material studied
as "Prov. Cearà, Gardn. [Gardner] n. 1695, et ut videtur
eadam Maranham, Gardn. [Gardner] n. 6037."

Delprete (2010a: 409) designated as lectotype of this
name a specimen of *Gardner 1695* at K. He followed
Bentham's citation as "*Gardner 1695*" but the orig-
nal gathering of *Faramea nitida* studied by Bentham is
*Gardner 1693* instead. According to Art. 9 of the *Code*,
this is a correctable error. Also, Delprete cited one speci-
men of *Gardner 1693* (as "*1695*") at K as lectotype, and
another specimen with the same collection number at
K, with the stamp "Herb. Hook." as the isolectotype. At
K there are three specimens of *Gardner 1693*, which are
discussed below.

The K specimen with barcode K000015387, is com-
posed of two flowering branches, with three labels, and
is without any stamp indicating either Bentham's or
Hooker's herbarium. The label at the bottom right corner
has the handwritten number "1693" and the printed text
"Gardner, Piahuy, Goyaz, &c., Coll. 1837-41, Brazil." The
label has the penciled annotation "1686. Cinchonaceae"
beside it. Above the two labels, there is another hand-
written label bearing "Ceará, Gardner 1693, Type, Fara-
mea nitida Benth., Det. Zappi, 9/1998."

The K specimen with barcode K000012328, is com-
posed of two flowering branches, and the sheet bears
the stamp "Herbarium Hookerianum, 1867." The anno-
tation "Brazil, Gardner 1839" is handwritten directly on
the sheet (author unknown). At the lower right corner
is affixed a label handwritten by Gardner saying "1693.
Cinchonaceae sp. [...] a genus intermediate between Ixo-
ra and Faramea. A shrub about a foot high. Flowers pure
white and highly odoriferous. [...] road near Crato. Oct.
1838." This is the specimen cited by Delprete (2010a:
409) as the isolectotype (as "isótipo") at K.

The K specimen with barcode K000012327, is com-
posed of a single sterile branch, and the sheet bears the
stamp "Herbarium Benthamianum, 1854." This speci-
men has a label with the printed text "Brasilia tropica,
with Acc. No. W0000984 is an isolectotype of *Ferdinandusa elliptica*.

In M, there is a sheet, with barcode M-0026505, associated with the name *Ferdinandusa elliptica* and collected by Johann Emanuel Pohl (1782-1834) in Brazil. It has one branch with an inflorescence with the flowers fallen off, and one separate leaf. On the separate leaf is attached a small label with the handwritten number "3361". On the bottom left corner of the sheet is a label with the heading "Herbarium Zuccarinii" and the handwritten annotations (author unknown) "Rubiacea, Tocoyena? Legit in Brasilia Dr. Pohl" and "Communicavit M. C. Vindob. anno 1839." Another label says "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Vgl. Pohl, Pl. Bras. II, t. 106. Determ. K. Suessenguth, München 1942." This is a specimen of *F. elliptica* Pohl.

**Synonym:**

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 424: "*Ferdinandusa ovalis* Pohl, Pl. Brasil. 2: 10, tab. 107. "1828" [1831]. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "ad Serra Manoel Gómez prope Capitalem" [Serra Dourada? perto da cidade de Goiás], *Pohl 1630* (B*, isótipo NY)."

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: "ad Serra Manoel Gómez prope Capitalem" [Serra Dourada? near the town of Goiás], Mar.-Apr. 1820, *J.B.E. Pohl 1630* (W [Acc. No. W0053551], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes NY [barcode 00131399], W [Acc. No. W0001012]).

**Notes:** Pohl (1828: 10-11) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa ovalis* Pohl, cited a gathering collected by himself as "Habitat in montosis, ad Serra de Manoel Gomez, prope Cidade de Goyaz, Capitaniae ejusdem nominis. Floret mense Martio et Aprili -1820." He did not indicate any collection number. The mountain range near the town of Goiás, the first capital of the homonymous state, is todays called Serra Dourada. In W there are two sheets of *Pohl 1630* with that collection locality. One W specimen, with Accession No. W0053551, consists of a branch with several leaves and a terminal inflorescence with flower buds. On the bottom right corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the handwritten text "**1630**. Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl. Brasilia. Pohl." Another label has the heading "Instituto de Botanica (SP)" and the handwritten text "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Lectotype of Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl, Det. E.A. Anunciação, 05/09/2003." The proposed lectotypification by Anunciação is not valid, as it is part of an unpublished doctoral thesis. This specimen is here designated as the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa ovalis*.

The other W specimen, with Accession No. W0001012, consists of a branch with several leaves (some of them detached) and a terminal inflorescence with the flowers fallen off. On the bottom right corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the handwritten annotation "1630. Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl. Serra de Manoel Gomez. Pohl." This specimen is an isolectotype.

At NY, there is another sheet of *Pohl 1630*, with barcode 00131399, consisting of a branch with a few leaves and a terminal inflorescence. The specimen label has the heading "Herb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and reports the locality as "Serra de Manoel Gomez." This specimen is an isolectotype of *Ferdinandusa ovalis*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 431: "20-3. *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, Pl. Brasil. 2: 12, tab. 108. "1828" [1831]. Sintipos: Brasil, Minas Gerais: Serra de Spilon, s.d., *Pohl 650*, 2827 (B*, NY); Goiás: Casa de Telha e Santa Cruz, s.d., *Martius s.n.* (B*)."

**Accepted name:** *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: "Serra de Spilons" [Serra dos Pilões], s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl Cat. no. 650*, 2827 (W [Acc. No. W0018440], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes, BR [barcode 000000530665], NY [barcode 00131400], W [2 sheets, Acc. No. W0053549, W0053550]).

**Notes:** Pohl (1828: 12-13) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, cited several gatherings as "Habitat in montosis uliginosis; in "Serra de Spilons" [sic! Serra des Pilons; "Serra dos Pilões"], Capitaniae Minas Geraës; ad Caza de Telha, et S. Cruz, Capitaniae Goyaz. Legi florentem mense Majo et Novembri 1818 et 1820."

Schumann (1889: 207) cited the material examined of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* as "Habitat in montosis uliginosis ad Caza da Telha et S. Cruz: Martius, floret Novembri; ad Arrayas: Gardner n. 4167; inter urbem Goyaz et Cavalcante: Burchell n. 7381; in provincia Minas Geraës in Serra dos Pilooës: Pohl n. 2867" and commented on the latter locality as follows: "Cl. Pohl nomen loci natalis falso Serra de Pilons publici juris fecit. Icon et description Pohliana non plane cum natural congruit, quia lacinias corollas recurvatas et stigma bifidum pinxit descripsitque; fabrica tali modo, ut supra exposuimus, semper observatur."

At W are present three sheets of *Pohl Cat. no. 650*, 2827. The first W sheet, Acc. No. W0018440, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences
with Acc. No. W0000984 is an isolectotype of *Ferdinandusa elliptica*.

In M, there is a sheet, with barcode M-0026505, associated with the name *Ferdinandusa elliptica* and collected by Johann Emanuel Pohl (1782-1834) in Brazil. It has one branch with an inflorescence with the flowers fallen off, and one separate leaf. On the separate leaf is attached a small label with the handwritten number "3361". On the bottom left corner of the sheet is a label with the heading "Herbarium Zuccarinii" and the handwritten annotations (author unknown) "Rubiacea, Tocoyena? Legit in Brasilia Dr. Pohl" and "Communicavit M. C. Vindob. anno 1839." Another label says "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Vgl. Pohl, Pl. Bras. II, t. 106. Determ. K. Suessenguth, München 1942." This is a specimen of *F. elliptica* Pohl.

**Synonym:**

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 424: "*Ferdinandusa ovalis* Pohl, Pl. Brasil. 2: 10, tab. 107. "1828" [1831]. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "ad Serra Manoel Gómez prope Capitalem" [Serra Dourada? perto da cidade de Goiás], *Pohl 1630* (B*, isótipo NY)."

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: "ad Serra Manoel Gómez prope Capitalem" [Serra Dourada? near the town of Goiás], Mar.-Apr. 1820, *J.B.E. Pohl 1630* (W [Acc. No. W0053551], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes NY [barcode 00131399], W [Acc. No. W0001012]).

**Notes:** Pohl (1828: 10-11) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa ovalis* Pohl, cited a gathering collected by himself as "Habitat in montosis, ad Serra de Manoel Gomez, prope Cidade de Goyaz, Capitaniae ejusdem nominis. Floret mense Martio et Aprili -1820." He did not indicate any collection number. The mountain range near the town of Goiás, the first capital of the homonymous state, is todays called Serra Dourada. In W there are two sheets of *Pohl 1630* with that collection locality. One W specimen, with Accession No. W0053551, consists of a branch with several leaves and a terminal inflorescence with flower buds. On the bottom right corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the handwritten text "**1630**. Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl. Brasilia. Pohl." Another label has the heading "Instituto de Botanica (SP)" and the handwritten text "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Lectotype of Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl, Det. E.A. Anunciação, 05/09/2003." The proposed lectotypification by Anunciação is not valid, as it is part of an unpublished doctoral thesis. This specimen is here designated as the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa ovalis*.

The other W specimen, with Accession No. W0001012, consists of a branch with several leaves (some of them detached) and a terminal inflorescence with the flowers fallen off. On the bottom right corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the handwritten annotation "1630. Ferdinandusa ovata Pohl. Serra de Manoel Gomez. Pohl." This specimen is an isolectotype.

At NY, there is another sheet of *Pohl 1630*, with barcode 00131399, consisting of a branch with a few leaves and a terminal inflorescence. The specimen label has the heading "Herb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and reports the locality as "Serra de Manoel Gomez." This specimen is an isolectotype of *Ferdinandusa ovalis*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 431: "20-3. *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, Pl. Brasil. 2: 12, tab. 108. "1828" [1831]. Sintipos: Brasil, Minas Gerais: Serra de Spilon, s.d., *Pohl 650*, 2827 (B*, NY); Goiás: Casa de Telha e Santa Cruz, s.d., *Martius s.n.* (B*)."

**Accepted name:** *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: "Serra de Spilons" [Serra dos Pilões], s.d., *J.B.E. Pohl Cat. no. 650*, 2827 (W [Acc. No. W0018440], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes, BR [barcode 000000530665], NY [barcode 00131400], W [2 sheets, Acc. No. W0053549, W0053550]).

**Notes:** Pohl (1828: 12-13) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, cited several gatherings as "Habitat in montosis uliginosis; in "Serra de Spilons" [sic! Serra des Pilons; "Serra dos Pilões"], Capitaniae Minas Geraës; ad Caza de Telha, et S. Cruz, Capitaniae Goyaz. Legi florentem mense Majo et Novembri 1818 et 1820."

Schumann (1889: 207) cited the material examined of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* as "Habitat in montosis uliginosis ad Caza da Telha et S. Cruz: Martius, floret Novembri; ad Arrayas: Gardner n. 4167; inter urbem Goyaz et Cavalcante: Burchell n. 7381; in provincia Minas Geraës in Serra dos Pilooës: Pohl n. 2867" and commented on the latter locality as follows: "Cl. Pohl nomen loci natalis falso Serra de Pilons publici juris fecit. Icon et description Pohliana non plane cum natural congruit, quia lacinias corollas recurvatas et stigma bifidum pinxit descripsitque; fabrica tali modo, ut supra exposuimus, semper observatur."

At W are present three sheets of *Pohl Cat. no. 650*, 2827. The first W sheet, Acc. No. W0018440, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences
with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner is a label with the heading "Herb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and the handwritten annotation "650, 2827, ad Serra de Spilon, Pohl." The second W sheet, Acc. No. W0053549, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner of the sheet is affixed a label without heading and the handwritten annotation "650, 2827, ad Serra de Spilon, Pohl." The third W sheet, Acc. No. W0053550, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner there is a label with the heading "Hrb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and the handwritten annotation "2827, Ferdinandusa speciosa Pohl. Ad Serra de Spilon in desertis ad aquas, ad S. Cruz, Pohl." The W specimen with Acc. No. W0018440 is the most complete and is here designated as the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa speciosa*.

In M, there is a specimen, with barcode M-0187463, consisting of a large branch with several inflorescences, flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On a lower branch of the specimen is attached a small label with the handwritten number "3083". On the bottom left of the sheet is a label with the heading "Herbarium Zuccarini" and the handwritten text (author unknown) "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Legit in Brasilia Dr. Pohl" and "Communícavit M. C. Vindob. anno 1839." This specimen is possible original material of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, as it was transferred from W to M in 1839.

**Synonym:**

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 431:

"*Ferdinandusa pubescens* Wedd., Ann. Sci. Nat. IV, 1: 78. 1854. - *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl f. *pubescens* (Wedd.) Steyerm., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 23: 285. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "inter urbes Patrocínio et Goyaz", s.d., *Weddell* 2535 (holótipo, P)."

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais or Goiás: "inter urbes Patrocínio et Goyaz", 1844, H.A. Weddell 2535 (P [barcode P01900520], lectotype here designated; isolectotypes P [2 sheets, barcodes P01900521, P01900522]).

**Notes:** Weddell (1854: 78) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa pubescens* Wedd. cited a gathering collected by himself as follows "In locis uliginosis sylvarum inter urbes Patrocinho et Goyaz Brasiliae mediae, Martio florentem ipse legi. (Cat. propr., nº 2535.)" At P there are three sheets of *Weddell* 2535. The first specimen, with barcode P01900520, consists of one branch with an inflorescence and several flowers in anthesis. The speci-

men label has the heading "Herb. Mus. Paris." with the annotation handwritten by Weddell "Ferdinandusa pubescens Wedd. Brésil central, M.A. Weddell. 1844. Nº 2535."

The second P specimen, with barcode P01900521, consists of one branch with an inflorescence bearing several flowers in anthesis and a label with the heading "Herb. Mus. Paris." with the handwritten text "Ferdinandusa pubescens Wedd. (Weddell ser.)", the printed text "BRÉSIL central. 1844. M.A. Weddell." and the handwritten collection number "2535."

The third P specimen, with barcode P01900522, consists of two branches with inflorescences and numerous flowers in anthesis. Its label is the same as that of P01900521. Because the specimen with barcode P01900520 has the label handwritten by Weddell, it is here designated the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa pubescens*.

21. **GALIANTHE** Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 445:

"21-1. *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 27: 239. "1991" [1992]. - *Borreria angustifolia* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. 1829. Tipo: Brasil, "in Brasilia aequinocialis", *Sellow 498* (holótipo, B*, foto em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL: "in Brasilia aequinocialis", s.d., *F. Sellow 498* (B†; F [ex B, Acc. No. 607102], lectotype here designated; photo-B (F0BN000871) in F, NY). - BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Poço de Caldas, Cristo Redentor, 14 Jan. 1980, A. Krapovickas & C.L. Cristóbal 35308 (CTES [Acc. No. 64684, barcode CTES0013482], epitype here designated).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b: 330) cited the material studied of *Borreria angustifolia* Cham. & Schltdl. as "In Brasilia aequinotialis legit Sellow." The material at B studied by Chamisso & Schlechtendal was destroyed during WWII. A photograph of the B specimen (F0BN000871) shows that it was a gathering of *Sellow 498*. Cabral (1991: 239) cited only the photograph of the B specimen for *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral.

At F there is a sheet, Accession No. 607102, with a fragment of *Sellow 498* removed from the destroyed B specimen and a photograph of the B specimen (Neg.
with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner is a label with the heading "Herb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and the handwritten annotation "650, 2827, ad Serra de Spilon, Pohl." The second W sheet, Acc. No. W0053549, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner of the sheet is affixed a label without heading and the handwritten annotation "650, 2827, ad Serra de Spilon, Pohl." The third W sheet, Acc. No. W0053550, has a branch with several leaves and terminal inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On the lower right corner there is a label with the heading "Hrb. Musei Palat. Vindob." and the handwritten annotation "2827, Ferdinandusa speciosa Pohl. Ad Serra de Spilon in desertis ad aquas, ad S. Cruz, Pohl." The W specimen with Acc. No. W0018440 is the most complete and is here designated as the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa speciosa*.

In M, there is a specimen, with barcode M-0187463, consisting of a large branch with several inflorescences, flower buds and flowers in anthesis. On a lower branch of the specimen is attached a small label with the handwritten number "3083". On the bottom left of the sheet is a label with the heading "Herbarium Zuccarinii" and the handwritten text (author unknown) "Ferdinandusa elliptica Pohl, Legit in Brasilia Dr. Pohl" and "Communicavit M. C. Vindob. anno 1839." This specimen is possible original material of *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl, as it was transferred from W to M in 1839.

**Synonym:**

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 431:
"*Ferdinandusa pubescens* Wedd., Ann. Sci. Nat. IV, 1: 78. 1854. - *Ferdinandusa speciosa* Pohl f. *pubescens* (Wedd.) Steyerm., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 23: 285. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, "inter urbes Patrocinio et Goyaz", s.d., *Weddell* 2535 (holótipo, P)."

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais or Goiás: "inter urbes Patrocinio et Goyaz", 1844, H.A. Weddell 2535 (P [barcode P01900520], lectotype here designated; isolectotypes P [2 sheets, barcodes P01900521, P01900522]).

**Notes:** Weddell (1854: 78) along with the description of *Ferdinandusa pubescens* Wedd. cited a gathering collected by himself as follows "In locis uliginosis sylvarum inter urbes Patrocinho et Goyaz Brasiliae mediae, Martio florentem ipse legi. (Cat. propr., nº 2535.)" At P there are three sheets of *Weddell* 2535. The first specimen, with barcode P01900520, consists of one branch with an inflorescence and several flowers in anthesis. The speci-

men label has the heading "Herb. Mus. Paris." with the annotation handwritten by Weddell "Ferdinandusa pubescens Wedd. Brésil central, M.A. Weddell. 1844. Nº 2535."

The second P specimen, with barcode P01900521, consists of one branch with an inflorescence bearing several flowers in anthesis and a label with the heading "Herb. Mus. Paris." with the handwritten text "Ferdinandusa pubescens Wedd. (Weddell ser.)", the printed text "BRÉSIL central. 1844. M.A. Weddell." and the handwritten collection number "2535."

The third P specimen, with barcode P01900522, consists of two branches with inflorescences and numerous flowers in anthesis. Its label is the same as that of P01900521. Because the specimen with barcode P01900520 has the label handwritten by Weddell, it is here designated the lectotype of *Ferdinandusa pubescens*.

21. **GALIANTHE** Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 445:
"21-1. *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 27: 239. "1991" [1992]. - *Borreria angustifolia* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. 1829. Tipo: Brasil, "in Brasilia aequinocialis", *Sellow 498* (holótipo, B*, foto em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL: "in Brasilia aequinocialis", s.d., *F. Sellow 498* (B†; F [ex B, Acc. No. 607102], lectotype here designated; photo-B (F0BN000871) in F, NY). - BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Poço de Caldas, Cristo Redentor, 14 Jan. 1980, A. Krapovickas & C.L. Cristóbal 35308 (CTES [Acc. No. 64684, barcode CTES0013482], epitype here designated).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b: 330) cited the material studied of *Borreria angustifolia* Cham. & Schltdl. as "In Brasilia aequinotialis legit Sellow." The material at B studied by Chamisso & Schlechtendal was destroyed during WWII. A photograph of the B specimen (F0BN000871) shows that it was a gathering of *Sellow 498*. Cabral (1991: 239) cited only the photograph of the B specimen for *Galianthe angustifolia* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral.

At F there is a sheet, Accession No. 607102, with a fragment of *Sellow 498* removed from the destroyed B specimen and a photograph of the B specimen (Neg.
No. 871). This specimen has two annotation labels "Galianthe angustifolia (Cham. et Schltdl.) Cabral, Det: E. Cabral 1993" and "Isotype of: Borreria angustifolia Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. 1828."

Cabral (2009: 31) designated the specimen of *Krapovickas & Cristóbal 35308* at SP as the neotype of *Borreria angustifolia*, and the duplicate at CTES as the isotype. However, there is no such specimen in SP (M.C. Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm.). Article 9.19(a) of the *Code* states that the first neotype designation must be followed, but it is superseded if any of the original material exists. Therefore, Cabral's neotype designation based on the SP specimen is superseded by the F specimen, which is an isotype and is here designated the lectotype of *Borreria angustifolia*. The fragment of *Sellow 498* at F (Acc. No. 607102) has one node with axillary brachyblasts characteristic of this species. However, there are several species in *Galianthe* with axillary brachybasts, and flower and fruits are necessary to identify with certainty the species in question. Therefore, it is necessary to designate an epi-type to permanently fix the application of the name. The specimen *Krapovickas & Cristóbal 35308* at CTES (Acc. No. 64684, barcode CTES0013482; annotated by Cabral as "isotipo"), is composed of three branches with terminal inflorescences bearing flowers and fruits and is here designated the epitype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 448: "21-2. *Galianthe centranthoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 27: 240. "1991" [1992]. *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. *Spermacoce centranthoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. pl. 3: 123. 1898. Tipo: Brasil, "in Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B*; isótipo LE n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe centranthoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: SOUTHERN BRAZIL. "In Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; HBG [barcode HBG-521832], lectotype designated by Florentín et al. (2022: 31); isolectotypes G? n.v., HBG [barcode HBG-521833], LE n.v.; possible isolectotype K [barcode K000470274]).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828: 328-329) cited the material studied of *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as "In Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit Sellow." In the following page, they described *B. centranthoides* var. *β angustifolia* Cham.

& Schltdl. and cited the material studied as "In Brasilia aequinocialis legit Sellow. 2." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976: 482; 1985: 190): "Chamisso's own herbarium was also acquired by LE." and Diederich Franz Leonard von Schlechtendal "Herbarium and types: HAL. Several of the types of his Berlin period were at B (mainly destroyed). - Plants for the botanical gardens of Berlin and Halle, and material from his herbarium (but collected by others) are e.g. at CAS, E, FI, G, L, M, MW, WAG." The original material at B was destroyed during WWII.

Cabral (1992: 240) cited the type of *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as "*In Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit Sellow* (isotipo LE!)." Later, Cabral (2009: 33) cited the type of this name as "Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit, 1829, *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo, HB no visto; isotipos, G!, LE!)." The code HB corresponds to the Herbarium Bradeanum in Rio de Janeiro. Cabral's 2009 citation of the holotype specimen present in HB is erroneous, because in that institution there only exists a photograph of the destroyed B specimen.

In HBG there are two sheets, with barcodes HBG-521832 and HBG-521833, collected by Sellow, and annotated by Schlechtendal as "Borreria centranthoides N. β angustifolia, Brasilia." These sheets are original material of this varietal name. Florentín et al. (2022: 31) designated the sheet with barcode HBG-521832 as the lectotype of *Borreria centranthoides*, and that with barcode HBG-521833 as an isolectotype.

At K there is a sheet with two different gatherings. The specimen on the right side of the sheet, with barcode K000470274, was annotated by Chamisso and is a possible isolectotype.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 451: "21-3. *Galianthe fastigiata* Griseb., Goett. Abh. 24: 157. 1879. *Borreria fastigiata* (Griseb.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 68. 1888. *Spermacoce fastigiata* (Griseb.) Niederl., Bol. Mens. Mus. Prod. Argent. 3(31): 306. 1890. *Spermacoce fastigiata* (Griseb.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 3(2): 123. 1898. Tipo: Argentina, Entre Ríos, Palmar Grande, 3/II/1876, *P.L. Lorentz 803* (holótipo, GOET; isótipo, CORD n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe fastigiata* Griseb.

Type: ARGENTINA. Entre Ríos: Palmar Grande, 3 Feb. 1876, *P.L. Lorentz 803* (GOET [barcode GOET010265] lectotype designated by Florentín et al. (2022: 32); isolectotypes, CORD [2 sheets, barcodes CORD00006245, CORD00006246], GOET [barcode GOET010266]).
No. 871). This specimen has two annotation labels "Galianthe angustifolia (Cham. et Schltdl.) Cabral, Det: E. Cabral 1993" and "Isotype of: Borreria angustifolia Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. 1828."

Cabral (2009: 31) designated the specimen of *Krapovickas & Cristóbal 35308* at SP as the neotype of *Borreria angustifolia*, and the duplicate at CTES as the isotype. However, there is no such specimen in SP (M.C. Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm.). Article 9.19(a) of the *Code* states that the first neotype designation must be followed, but it is superseded if any of the original material exists. Therefore, Cabral's neotype designation based on the SP specimen is superseded by the F specimen, which is an isotype and is here designated the lectotype of *Borreria angustifolia*. The fragment of *Sellow 498* at F (Acc. No. 607102) has one node with axillary brachyblasts characteristic of this species. However, there are several species in *Galianthe* with axillary brachybasts, and flower and fruits are necessary to identify with certainty the species in question. Therefore, it is necessary to designate an epi-type to permanently fix the application of the name. The specimen *Krapovickas & Cristóbal 35308* at CTES (Acc. No. 64684, barcode CTES0013482; annotated by Cabral as "isotipo"), is composed of three branches with terminal inflorescences bearing flowers and fruits and is here designated the epitype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 448:
"21-2. **Galianthe centranthoides** (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 27: 240. "1991" [1992].
- *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 330. - *Spermacoce centranthoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. pl. 3: 123. 1898. Tipo: Brasil, "in Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B*; isótipo LE n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe centranthoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: SOUTHERN BRAZIL. "In Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; HBG [barcode HBG-521832], lectotype designated by Florentín et al. (2022: 31); isolectotypes G? n.v., HBG [barcode HBG-521833], LE n.v.; possible isolectotype K [barcode K000470274]).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828: 328-329) cited the material studied of *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as "In Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit Sellow." In the following page, they described *B. centranthoides* var. *β angustifolia* Cham.

& Schltdl. and cited the material studied as "In Brasilia aequinocialis legit Sellow. 2." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976: 482; 1985: 190): "Chamisso's own herbarium was also acquired by LE." and Diederich Franz Leonard von Schlechtendal "Herbarium and types: HAL. Several of the types of his Berlin period were at B (mainly destroyed). - Plants for the botanical gardens of Berlin and Halle, and material from his herbarium (but collected by others) are e.g. at CAS, E, FI, G, L, M, MW, WAG." The original material at B was destroyed during WWII.

Cabral (1992: 240) cited the type of *Borreria centranthoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as "*In Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit Sellow* (isotipo LE!)." Later, Cabral (2009: 33) cited the type of this name as "Brasilia meridionali pluries lectam misit, 1829, *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo, HB no visto; isotipos, G!, LE!)." The code HB corresponds to the Herbarium Bradeanum in Rio de Janeiro. Cabral's 2009 citation of the holotype specimen present in HB is erroneous, because in that institution there only exists a photograph of the destroyed B specimen.

In HBG there are two sheets, with barcodes HBG-521832 and HBG-521833, collected by Sellow, and annotated by Schlechtendal as "Borreria centranthoides N. β angustifolia, Brasilia." These sheets are original material of this varietal name. Florentín et al. (2022: 31) designated the sheet with barcode HBG-521832 as the lectotype of *Borreria centranthoides*, and that with barcode HBG-521833 as an isolectotype.

At K there is a sheet with two different gatherings. The specimen on the right side of the sheet, with barcode K000470274, was annotated by Chamisso and is a possible isolectotype.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 451:
"21-3. **Galianthe fastigiata** Griseb., Goett. Abh. 24: 157. 1879. - *Borreria fastigiata* (Griseb.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 68. 1888. - *Spermacoce fastigiata* (Griseb.) Niederl., Bol. Mens. Mus. Prod. Argent. 3(31): 306. 1890. - *Spermacoce fastigiata* (Griseb.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 3(2): 123. 1898. Tipo: Argentina, Entre Ríos, Palmar Grande, 3/II/1876, *P.L. Lorentz 803* (holótipo, GOET; isótipo, CORD n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe fastigiata* Griseb.

Type: ARGENTINA. Entre Ríos: Palmar Grande, 3 Feb. 1876, *P.L. Lorentz 803* (GOET [barcode GOET010265] lectotype designated by Florentín et al. (2022: 32); isolectotypes, CORD [2 sheets, barcodes CORD00006245, CORD00006246], GOET [barcode GOET010266]).
Standl., Publ. Field Columbian Mus., Bot. Ser. 8: 392. 1931. Tipo: Brasil, São Paulo, Ypiranga, 31/XII/1911, *Brade* 5266 (holótipo S, isótipo SP).”

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe liliifolia* (Standl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. São Paulo: Ypiranga, 31 Dec. 1911, *A.C. Brade* 5266 (holotype S [Acc. No. S05-1643], isotype SP [not there!]; isotype fragment F [ex S, Acc. No. 638797]).

**Notes:** Standley (1931: 392) along with the description of *Borreria liliifolia* Standl. cited the holotype specimen as “Brazil. Ypiranga, State of São Paulo, December 31, 1911, Alex. Curt Brade (Herb. Stockholm, type).” Cabral (2009: 41) cited the type of *B. liliifolia* as “Tipo: Brasil. São Paulo: Ipiranga, 31 dic. 1911, *Alex Brade* 5266 (holotipo S!, isótipos, F!, SP!).” However, there is no specimen of *Brade* 5266 at SP (M.C. Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm.).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 475:
“21-8. **Galianthe longisepala** E.L. Cabral, Bonplandia 13: 15. 2004. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, Mun. Cristalina, Serra dos Cristais, 2 km de Cristalina, 1250 m, 2/III/1966, *H.S. Irwin, J.W. Grear Jr.*, R. *Souza & R.R. dos Santos* 13307 (holótipo, UB; isótipos, F n.v., MO, NY, RB, US).”

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe longisepala* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Mun. Cristalina, Serra dos Cristais, 2 km de Cristalina, 1250 m, 2 Mar. 1966, *H.S. Irwin, J.W. Grear Jr.*, R. *Souza & R.R. dos Santos* 13307 (holotype, UB [barcode UB0040419]; isotypes, F [not there!], MO [not there!], NY [not there!], RB [not there!], US [barcode 01106441]).

**Notes:** Cabral (2004: 15) described *Galianthe longisepala* E.L. Cabral, and cited the holotype at UB and the isotypes at “F!, MO!, NY!, RB!, US!” However, there is no duplicate of Irwin et al. 13307 in F, MO, NY and RB, as confirmed by the herbarium curators of those institutions.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 478:
“21-9. **Galianthe macedoi** E. L. Cabral, Bonplandia 10: 121, fig. 2. 2000. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, Mun. Jataí, Fazenda Queixada, 10/XII/1948 (fl, fr), *A. Macedo* 1468 (holótipo, SP; isótipos, CTES n.v., F n.v., IAC n.v., NY, SP).”

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe macedoi* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Mun. Jataí, Fazenda Queixada, 10 Dec. 1948 (fl, fr), *A. Macedo* 1468 (holotype, SP [barcode SP001549]; isotypes, CTES [barcode CTES0013531], F [not there!], IAC n.v. [not traced], NY n.v. [not traced], US [barcode 01106440]).

**Notes:** Cabral (2009: 43) cited the type of *Galianthe macedoi* E. L. Cabral as “Tipo: Brasil. Goiás: Jataí, Faz. Queixada, 10 dic. 1948, *A. Macedo* 1468 (holótipo, SP!; isótipos, CTES!, F!, IAC 28270!, NY!, SP!).” There is no duplicate of *Macedo* 1468 in F (Cristine Niezgoda, F Herbarium Curator, pers. comm., 22 Jun. 2022). Also, in SP, there is only one specimen of *Macedo* 1468 (Maria Candida Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm. of 25 Jun. 2022), with barcode SP001549, which is the holotype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 481:
“21-10. **Galianthe peruviana** (Pers.) E.L. Cabral, Bonplandia 10: 121. 2000. - *Spermacoce peruviana* Pers., Syn. Pl. 1: 124. 1805 (nom. nov. para *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav.) - *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., nom. illeg., Fl. peruv. 1: 60, tab. 91, fig. a. 1798. - non *Spermacoce corymbosa* L., Sp. Pl. ed. 2, 1: 149. 1762. - *Borreria peruviana* (Pers.) L.B. Sm. & Downs, Sellowia 7: 78. 1956. Tipo: Peru, “in montibus ad Muna vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormilla et Rinconada”, s.d., *Ruiz & Pavón s.n.* (holótipo, MA; isótipos, B-Willd., F; foto-B em NY).”

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe peruviana* (Pers.) E.L.Cabral

Type: PERU: “in montibus ad Muña vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ”, s.d., *H. Ruiz López & J.A. Pavón y Jiménez s.n.* (MA [barcode MA 815644], lectotype here designated; isotype types MA [barcode MA 817204], drawings MA AJB04-D-0198_001 and MA AJB04-D-01989_001; possible isotype types B-W [barcode B -W 02615 -00 0], BR [barcode 000000557825], F [Acc. No. 844771]).

**Notes:** Ruiz and Pavón (1798: 60) described the collection localities of *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., nom. illeg. (non *S. corymbosa* L. (1762: 149)), as “Habitat in Peruviae montibus ad Muña vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ.” Cabral (2009: 45) cited the type of *Spermacoce peruviana* Pers., a replace-
Standl., Publ. Field Columbian Mus., Bot. Ser. 8: 392.
1931. Tipo: Brasil, São Paulo, Ypiranga, 31/XII/1911, *Brade* 5266 (holótipo S, isótipo SP)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe liliifolia* (Standl.) E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. São Paulo: Ypiranga, 31 Dec. 1911, *A.C. Brade* 5266 (holotype S [Acc. No. S05-1643], isotype SP [not there!]; isotype fragment F [ex S, Acc. No. 638797]).

**Notes:** Standley (1931: 392) along with the description of *Borreria liliifolia* Standl. cited the holotype specimen as "Brazil. Ypiranga, State of São Paulo, December 31, 1911, Alex. Curt Brade (Herb. Stockholm, type)." Cabral (2009: 41) cited the type of *B. liliifolia* as "Tipo: Brasil. São Paulo: Ipiranga, 31 dic. 1911, *Alex Brade* 5266 (holotipo S!, isótipos, F!, SP!)." However, there is no specimen of *Brade* 5266 at SP (M.C. Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm.).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 475:
"21-8. **Galianthe longisepala** E.L. Cabral, Bonplandia 13: 15. 2004. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, Mun. Cristalina, Serra dos Cristais, 2 km de Cristalina, 1250 m, 2/III/1966, *H.S. Irwin, J.W. Grear Jr.*, *R. Souza & R.R. dos Santos* 13307 (holótipo, UB; isótipos, F n.v., MO, NY, RB, US)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe longisepala* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Mun. Cristalina, Serra dos Cristais, 2 km de Cristalina, 1250 m, 2 Mar. 1966, *H.S. Irwin, J.W. Grear Jr.*, *R. Souza & R.R. dos Santos* 13307 (holotype, UB [barcode UB0040419]; isotypes, F [not there!], MO [not there!], NY [not there!], RB [not there!], US [barcode 01106441]).

**Notes:** Cabral (2004: 15) described *Galianthe longisepala* E.L. Cabral, and cited the holotype at UB and the isotypes at "F!, MO!, NY!, RB!, US!" However, there is no duplicate of Irwin et al. 13307 in F, MO, NY and RB, as confirmed by the herbarium curators of those institutions.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 478:
"21-9. **Galianthe macedoi** E. L. Cabral, Bonplandia 10: 121, fig. 2. 2000. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, Mun. Jataí, Fazenda Queixada, 10/XII/1948 (fl, fr), *A. Macedo* 1468 (holótipo, SP; isótipos, CTES n.v., F n.v., IAC n.v., NY, SP)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe macedoi* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Mun. Jataí, Fazenda Queixada, 10 Dec. 1948 (fl, fr), *A. Macedo* 1468 (holotype, SP [barcode SP001549]; isotypes, CTES [barcode CTES0013531], F [not there!], IAC n.v. [not traced], NY n.v. [not traced], US [barcode 01106440]).

**Notes:** Cabral (2009: 43) cited the type of *Galianthe macedoi* E. L. Cabral as "Tipo: Brasil. Goiás: Jataí, Faz. Queixada, 10 dic. 1948, *A. Macedo* 1468 (holótipo, SP!; isótipos, CTES!, F!, IAC 28270!, NY!, SP!)." There is no duplicate of *Macedo* 1468 in F (Cristine Niezgoda, F Herbarium Curator, pers. comm., 22 Jun. 2022). Also, in SP, there is only one specimen of *Macedo* 1468 (Maria Candida Mamede, SP Herbarium Curator, pers. comm. of 25 Jun. 2022), with barcode SP001549, which is the holotype of this name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 481:
"21-10. **Galianthe peruviana** (Pers.) E.L. Cabral, Bonplandia 10: 121. 2000. - *Spermacoce peruviana* Pers., Syn. Pl. 1: 124. 1805 (nom. nov. para *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav.) - *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., nom. illeg., Fl. peruv. 1: 60, tab. 91, fig. a. 1798. - non *Spermacoce corymbosa* L., Sp. Pl. ed. 2, 1: 149. 1762. - *Borreria peruviana* (Pers.) L.B. Sm. & Downs, Sellowia 7: 78. 1956. Tipo: Peru, "in montibus ad Muna vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormilla et Rinconada", s.d., *Ruiz & Pavón s.n.* (holótipo, MA; isótipos, B-Willd., F; foto-B em NY)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe peruviana* (Pers.) E.L.Cabral

Type: PERU: "in montibus ad Muña vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ", s.d., *H. Ruiz López & J.A. Pavón y Jiménez s.n.* (MA [barcode MA 815644], lectotype here designated; isotype types MA [barcode MA 817204], drawings MA AJB04-D-0198_001 and MA AJB04-D-01989_001; possible isotype types B-W [barcode B -W 02615 -00 0], BR [barcode 000000557825], F [Acc. No. 844771]).

**Notes:** Ruiz and Pavón (1798: 60) described the collection localities of *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., nom. illeg. (non *S. corymbosa* L. (1762: 149)), as "Habitat in Peruviae montibus ad Muña vicum, in ruderatis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ." Cabral (2009: 45) cited the type of *Spermacoce peruviana* Pers., a replace-
ment name for *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., as "Perú. In peruviae montibus ad Muña vicum, in rudératis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ", *Ruiz & Pavón s.n.* (holotipo, MA; isotipos, B-W!, F!)." At MA, there are two specimens, two drawings, and a published illustration that are original material of *S. corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav. (Art. 9.4; Turland et al., 2018), which are described below.

The MA specimen with barcode MA817204 consists of three branches with terminal inflorescences. On the sheet are affixed two labels. A label with the printed text "Ex antiquo herbario generali, Herbarium Horti Botanici Matritensis, Plantae a "Ruiz et Pavón" in vice-regno Peruviano et Chilensi lectae" and the typewritten text "Borreria corymbosa (R & P) DC." The other label is entirely handwritten (author unknown) and says "Spermacoce corymbosa Fl. Peruv. f. 7a 9f faa - Ex Herbario Fl. Peruv. anno 1828."

The MA specimen with barcode MA815644 consists of a complete plant with a basal taproot and numerous branches and inflorescences. On the sheet are affixed two labels. A label with the heading "Herbarium Peruvianum, Ruiz et Pavon", the handwritten number "1200", and the handwritten annotation "Borreria corymbosa (R. et P.) DC., det. K. Krause, XI/31." The other label has the annotation "Spermacoce corymbosa Sp. Pl. T. 1. Per. de Muña y Cuchero" handwritten by Hipólito Ruiz.

The drawing of *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav. by José Brunete is one of the original drawings from Ruiz & Pavón's Expedition (1777-1816). This drawing has the name "Spermacoce corymbosa" written on the bottom of the sheet and the heading "XCI". In the drawing is depicted a plant with a central taproot and a ramified stem with several branches and terminal inflorescences. On the same sheet with the drawing, there is a label stating "REAL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO, CSIC, Real Expedición Botánica al Virreinato del Perú, AJB04-D-0198_001."

In the drawing by Isidro Gálvez, are depicted two *Spermacoce* species. This is another original drawing from Ruiz & Pavón's Expedition (1777-1816). On the left side of the drawing is depicted the distal portion of a *S. corymbosa* plant with terminal inflorescences. This drawing also has the heading "XCI". On the same sheet where the drawing is mounted, there is a label with the printed text "REAL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO, CSIC, Real Expedición Botánica al Virreinato del Perú, AJB04-D-01989_001."

All specimens and drawings described above represent excellent original material of *Spermacoce corymbosa*. Because specimen with barcode MA815644 has a label with the annotation "Spermacoce corymbosa

Sp. Pl. T. 1. Per. de Muña y Cuchero" handwritten by Hipólito Ruiz, it is here designated as the lectotype for this illegitimate name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 484:

"21-11. **Galianthe ramosa** E. L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 29: 225, fig. 1. 1993. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, BR-040, 12 S de Luziânia, 1000 m, 1/II/1990 (fl, fr), M. M. Arbo, R. Monteiro, A. Schinini & A. Furlan 3366 (holótipo, HRCB; isótipo, CTES n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe ramosa* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: BR-040, 12 km S de Luziânia, 1000 m, 1 Feb. 1990 (fl, fr), M.M. Arbo, R. Monteiro, A. Schinini & A. Furlan 3366 (holotype, HRCB [Acc. No. 12756]; isotype, CTES [barcode CTES0013533]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 491:

"21-12. **Galianthe verbenoides** (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879. - *Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl. forma prima Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 331. 1828. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Niederl., Bol. Mens. Mus. Prod. Argent. 3(31): 306. 1890. - *non Galianthe verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Kuntze, comb. *superfl.*, Rev. Gen. 3: 123. 1898. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Herter, comb. *superfl.*, Rev. Sudamer. Bot. 4: 196. 1937. Tipo: "Brasilia meridionali", *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído, isótipo LE, n.v. foto em F)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb.

Type: SOUTHERN BRAZIL: "Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; LE n.v., lectotype designated by Cabral (2009: 56); isolectotypes E [barcode E00505292], HAL [2 sheets, barcodes HAL0098356 & HAL0098356 (both det. Schlechtendal)], HBG [barcode HBG-521820 (det. Schlechtendal)]; isolectotype fragment F [(ex B) Acc. No. 605931]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl., Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828) cited the studied material as "In Brasilia meridionali legit *Sellow*." Cabral (1992 ["1991"]) cited the type of this name as "In Brasilia meridionali, legit *Sellow*, isotipo LE! Foto F 890 (B!)." Cabral (2009: 56) designated the type of this name as "TIPO: Brasil. In Brasilia meridionali legit *Sellow* (lectótipo, designado aquí, LE!)."
ment name for *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav., as "Perú. In peruviae montibus ad Muña vicum, in rudératis et runcationibus Cormillâ et Rinconadâ", *Ruiz & Pavón s.n.* (holotipo, MA; isotipos, B-W!, F!)." At MA, there are two specimens, two drawings, and a published illustration that are original material of *S. corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav. (Art. 9.4; Turland et al., 2018), which are described below.

The MA specimen with barcode MA817204 consists of three branches with terminal inflorescences. On the sheet are affixed two labels. A label with the printed text "Ex antiquo herbario generali, Herbarium Horti Botanici Matritensis, Plantae a "Ruiz et Pavón" in vice-regno Peruviano et Chilensi lectae" and the typewritten text "Borreria corymbosa (R & P) DC." The other label is entirely handwritten (author unknown) and says "Spermacoce corymbosa Fl. Peruv. f. 7a 9f faa - Ex Herbario Fl. Peruv. anno 1828."

The MA specimen with barcode MA815644 consists of a complete plant with a basal taproot and numerous branches and inflorescences. On the sheet are affixed two labels. A label with the heading "Herbarium Peruvianum, Ruiz et Pavon", the handwritten number "1200", and the handwritten annotation "Borreria corymbosa (R. et P.) DC., det. K. Krause, XI/31." The other label has the annotation "Spermacoce corymbosa Sp. Pl. T. 1. Per. de Muña y Cuchero" handwritten by Hipólito Ruiz.

The drawing of *Spermacoce corymbosa* Ruiz & Pav. by José Brunete is one of the original drawings from Ruiz & Pavón's Expedition (1777-1816). This drawing has the name "Spermacoce corymbosa" written on the bottom of the sheet and the heading "XCI". In the drawing is depicted a plant with a central taproot and a ramified stem with several branches and terminal inflorescences. On the same sheet with the drawing, there is a label stating "REAL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO, CSIC, Real Expedición Botánica al Virreinato del Perú, AJB04-D-0198_001."

In the drawing by Isidro Gálvez, are depicted two *Spermacoce* species. This is another original drawing from Ruiz & Pavón's Expedition (1777-1816). On the left side of the drawing is depicted the distal portion of a *S. corymbosa* plant with terminal inflorescences. This drawing also has the heading "XCI". On the same sheet where the drawing is mounted, there is a label with the printed text "REAL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO, CSIC, Real Expedición Botánica al Virreinato del Perú, AJB04-D-01989_001."

All specimens and drawings described above represent excellent original material of *Spermacoce corymbosa*. Because specimen with barcode MA815644 has a label with the annotation "Spermacoce corymbosa

Sp. Pl. T. 1. Per. de Muña y Cuchero" handwritten by Hipólito Ruiz, it is here designated as the lectotype for this illegitimate name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 484:

"21-11. **Galianthe ramosa** E. L. Cabral, Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 29: 225, fig. 1. 1993. Tipo: Brasil, Goiás, BR-040, 12 S de Luziânia, 1000 m, 1/II/1990 (fl, fr), *M. M. Arbo*, *R. Monteiro*, *A. Schinini* & *A. Furlan* 3366 (holótipo, HRCB; isótipo, CTES n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe ramosa* E.L.Cabral

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: BR-040, 12 km S de Luziânia, 1000 m, 1 Feb. 1990 (fl, fr), *M.M. Arbo*, *R. Monteiro*, *A. Schinini* & *A. Furlan* 3366 (holotype, HRCB [Acc. No. 12756]; isotype, CTES [barcode CTES0013533]).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 491:

"21-12. **Galianthe verbenoides** (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879. - *Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl. forma prima Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 3: 331. 1828. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Niederl., Bol. Mens. Mus. Prod. Argent. 3(31): 306. 1890. - *non Galianthe verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb., Symb. Fl. Argent. 24: 157. 1879. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Kuntze, comb. *superfl.*, Rev. Gen. 3: 123. 1898. - *Spermacoce verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Herter, comb. *superfl.*, Rev. Sudamer. Bot. 4: 196. 1937. Tipo: "Brasilia meridionali", *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído, isótipo LE, n.v. foto em F)."

**Accepted name:** *Galianthe verbenoides* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Griseb.

Type: SOUTHERN BRAZIL: "Brasilia meridionali", s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; LE n.v., lectotype designated by Cabral (2009: 56); isolectotypes E [barcode E00505292], HAL [2 sheets, barcodes HAL0098356 & HAL0098356 (both det. Schlechtendal)], HBG [barcode HBG-521820 (det. Schlechtendal)]; isolectotype fragment F [(ex B) Acc. No. 605931]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl., Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828) cited the studied material as "In Brasilia meridionali legit *Sellow*." Cabral (1992 ["1991"]) cited the type of this name as "In Brasilia meridionali, legit *Sellow*, isotipo LE! Foto F 890 (B!)." Cabral (2009: 56) designated the type of this name as "TIPO: Brasil. In Brasilia meridionali legit *Sellow* (lectótipo, designado aquí, LE!)."
*Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl. forma *prima* Cham. & Schltdl. is not a name. It is only the first of the five forms listed by Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828). See Art. 24.2, Art. 23.6(b) Ex. 15–18 (Turland et al., 2018).

22. **GALIUM** L., Sp. pl. ed. 1, 105. 1753.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 501:
“22-1. **Galium hypocarpium** (L.) Endl. ex Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. I. 4: 351. 1861. *Valantia hypocarpia* L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10: 1307. 1759. - *Rubia hypocarpia* (L.) DC., Prodr. 4: 591. 1830. - *Relbunium hypocarpium* (L.) Hemsl., Biol. Centr.-Amer., Bot. 2: 63. 1881. - Tipo: Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee, s.d., *P. Browne* 141 (holótipo, BM-LINN, microfiche em UC).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium hypocarpium* (L.) Endl. ex Griseb.

Type: [protologue]: “Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee”, s.d., *P. Browne s.n.* (LINN Herb. Linn. No. 1219.13, lectotype designated by Dempster (1990: 306)).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Valantia hypocarpia* L., Linnaeus (1759: 1307) made reference to page 141 of Patrick Browne's (1756) *Civil and Natural History of Jamaica*. On that page, Browne wrote “SPERMACOCE 5. *Scandens, floliis oblongis venis arcuatis refertis, flori-bus paucioribus conflipatis ad alas.*” Browne reported the collection locality as “I found this plant in the middle mountains of *Liguanee*; it is very weakly, grows in tufts, and seldom rises above two or three feet from the root.” According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976: 371), “Browne sold his Jamaican herbarium to Linnaeus in 1758 through Collison. It is now at LINN.”

Ehrendorfer (1955: 536.) stated that “*Valantia hypocarpia* L. is based on *Rubia* I. of Browne, P.: Hist. Jamaic. 141 (1756) where this locality is cited; it will probably be necessary to choose a neotype from Jamaica because there is no specimen in the Linnean Herbarium.”

Dempster (1990: 306) cited the type of *Valantia hypocarpia* as “Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee, s.d., *P. Browne* 141 (LINN holotype, not seen, microfiche in UC).” However, “141” is not a collection number, but is the page with Browne’s short description of “RUBIA I. Subhirsuta scandes...” Dempster’s type citation according to the *Code* is an inadvertent lectotypification on the LINN specimen. In LINN, there is a specimen, with Linnaeus Herbarium No. 1219.13 and the name “Valantia

hypocarpia” handwritten by Linnaeus. On the bottom of the sheet, it is written “Rubia subhirsuta scandens ... Brown. Jam. 141. This specimen is the lectotype of this name, as designated by Dempster.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 508:
“22-2. **Galium megapotamicum** Spreng., Syst. Veg. 4: 39. 1827. - *Relbunium megapotamicum* (Spreng.) Ehrend., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 544. 1955. Tipo: Brasil, “Rio Grande” [Rio Grande do Sul], s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng.

**Correct bibliographic citation:** *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng., Syst. Veg., ed. 16, 4 (2, Cur. Post.): 39. 1827.

Type: BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul: “Rio Grande” s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (K [barcode K000470356], lectotype here designated).

**Notes:** Sprengel (1827: 39) cited the material studied of *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng. as “*Rio Grande. Sello.*” The original material of *G. megapotamicum* at B, where Sprengel worked, was destroyed during WWII. Searching for possible original material, a sheet at K has two specimens mounted on it, with different collectors and collection localities. The specimen on the right side of the sheet, with barcode K000470357, has the note handwritten directly on the sheet “Minas Gerais, Claussen”, and therefore, is not original material. The specimen on the left side of the sheet, with barcode K000470356, has the following handwritten label “Galium hirtum Linn.! - G. megapotamicum Spr! - Sellow, Brasilia”; this specimen is here designated as the lectotype of *G. megapotamicum*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 511:
“22-3. **Galium noxium** (A. St. Hil.) Dempster, Allertonia 5(3): 292. 1990. - *Rubia noxia* A. St. Hil., Hist. Pl. Remarq. Brésil 229. 1824. - *Relbunium noxium* (A. St. Hil.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 110. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, s.d., *A. Saint-Hilaire* 556 (holótipo, P).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium noxium* (A.St.Hil.) Dempster

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: “Bois à Itapuera paroisse de St Miguel de Mato Dentro”, s.d., *A. Saint-
*Borreria verbenoides* Cham. & Schltdl. forma *prima* Cham. & Schltdl. is not a name. It is only the first of the five forms listed by Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1828). See Art. 24.2, Art. 23.6(b) Ex. 15–18 (Turland et al., 2018).

22. **GALIUM** L., Sp. pl. ed. 1, 105. 1753.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 501:
“22-1. **Galium hypocarpium** (L.) Endl. ex Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. I. 4: 351. 1861. *Valantia hypocarpia* L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10: 1307. 1759. - *Rubia hypocarpia* (L.) DC., Prodr. 4: 591. 1830. - *Relbunium hypocarpium* (L.) Hemsl., Biol. Centr.-Amer., Bot. 2: 63. 1881. - Tipo: Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee, s.d., *P. Browne* 141 (holótipo, BM-LINN, microfiche em UC).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium hypocarpium* (L.) Endl. ex Griseb.

Type: [protologue]: “Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee”, s.d., *P. Browne s.n.* (LINN Herb. Linn. No. 1219.13, lectotype designated by Dempster (1990: 306)).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Valantia hypocarpia* L., Linnaeus (1759: 1307) made reference to page 141 of Patrick Browne's (1756) *Civil and Natural History of Jamaica*. On that page, Browne wrote “SPERMACOCE 5. *Scandens, floliis oblongis venis arcuatis refertis, flori-bus paucioribus conflipatis ad alas.*” Browne reported the collection locality as “I found this plant in the middle mountains of *Liguanee*; it is very weakly, grows in tufts, and seldom rises above two or three feet from the root.” According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976: 371), “Browne sold his Jamaican herbarium to Linnaeus in 1758 through Collison. It is now at LINN.”

Ehrendorfer (1955: 536.) stated that “*Valantia hypocarpia* L. is based on *Rubia* I. of Browne, P.: Hist. Jamaic. 141 (1756) where this locality is cited; it will probably be necessary to choose a neotype from Jamaica because there is no specimen in the Linnean Herbarium.”

Dempster (1990: 306) cited the type of *Valantia hypocarpia* as “Jamaica, middle mountain of Liguanee, s.d., *P. Browne* 141 (LINN holotype, not seen, microfiche in UC).” However, “141” is not a collection number, but is the page with Browne’s short description of “RUBIA I. Subhirsuta scandes...” Dempster’s type citation according to the *Code* is an inadvertent lectotypification on the LINN specimen. In LINN, there is a specimen, with Linnaeus Herbarium No. 1219.13 and the name “Valantia

hypocarpia” handwritten by Linnaeus. On the bottom of the sheet, it is written “Rubia subhirsuta scandens ... Brown. Jam. 141. This specimen is the lectotype of this name, as designated by Dempster.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 508:
“22-2. **Galium megapotamicum** Spreng., Syst. Veg. 4: 39. 1827. - *Relbunium megapotamicum* (Spreng.) Ehrend., Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 544. 1955. Tipo: Brasil, “Rio Grande” [Rio Grande do Sul], s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (holótipo B, destruído).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng.

**Correct bibliographic citation:** *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng., Syst. Veg., ed. 16, 4 (2, Cur. Post.): 39. 1827.

Type: BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul: “Rio Grande” s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (K [barcode K000470356], lectotype here designated).

**Notes:** Sprengel (1827: 39) cited the material studied of *Galium megapotamicum* Spreng. as “*Rio Grande. Sello.*” The original material of *G. megapotamicum* at B, where Sprengel worked, was destroyed during WWII. Searching for possible original material, a sheet at K has two specimens mounted on it, with different collectors and collection localities. The specimen on the right side of the sheet, with barcode K000470357, has the note handwritten directly on the sheet “Minas Gerais, Claussen”, and therefore, is not original material. The specimen on the left side of the sheet, with barcode K000470356, has the following handwritten label “Galium hirtum Linn.! - G. megapotamicum Spr! - Sellow, Brasilia”; this specimen is here designated as the lectotype of *G. megapotamicum*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 511:
“22-3. **Galium noxium** (A. St. Hil.) Dempster, Allertonia 5(3): 292. 1990. - *Rubia noxia* A. St. Hil., Hist. Pl. Remarq. Brésil 229. 1824. - *Relbunium noxium* (A. St. Hil.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 110. 1888. Tipo: Brasil, Minas Gerais, s.d., *A. Saint-Hilaire* 556 (holótipo, P).”

**Accepted name:** *Galium noxium* (A.St.Hil.) Dempster

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: “Bois à Itapuera paroisse de St Miguel de Mato Dentro”, s.d., *A. Saint-
*Hilaire* 556 (first-step lectotype designated by Dempster (1990: 292); P [barcode P00723673], **second-step lectotype here designated**).

**Note:** Auguste de Saint-Hilaire (1824: 229) cited the collection locality of the material studied of *Rubia noxia* A. St. Hil. as "Crescit in sylvis primaevis provinciae Minas Gerais. Floret Februario-Martio" and did not cite the collection number. Dempster (1990: 292) cited the type of *R. noxia* as "Brazil: Minas Gerais, *St. Hilaire* 556" (B holotype, destroyed, photos at F, GH)." It is unknown to me why she cited as holotype a specimen at B that was destroyed during WWII, as she certainly knew that Saint-Hilaire's original material is at P. It is possible that her citation is a typographical error, as she wrote "B" but she probably intended to write "P". However, this seems to be unlikely because, as she stated that it was destroyed, which indicates that she intended to write that the specimen was at B. Therefore, Dempster's citation can only be interpreted as a first-step inadvertent lectotypification because she cited *Saint-Hilaire* 556 as type.

Auguste de Saint-Hilaire worked at P, hence this is the institution where his original specimens should be found. Delprete (2010a: 511) cited as holotype a specimen of *Saint Hilaire* 556 at P. Such citation cannot be interpreted as a second-step lectotypification because after 2001 it should have been accompanied by "here designated" or a similar expression. At P there are several original specimens of *Rubia noxia* collected by A. Saint-Hilaire in Brazil, and only one of them has collection number 556. That specimen, with barcode P00723673, consists of several branches with flowers and fruits. On the bottom left corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the annotation "Rubia noxia Aug. de S¹ Hil. - Bois à Itapuera paroisse de St Miguel de Mato Dentro (A. de St. Hilaire Script.)" handwritten by Saint-Hilaire. On the upper left corner of the sheet there is a label with the heading "Herbarium Musei Parisiensis" and the penciled annotation "Type = St. Hilaire 556, n. date, Minas Gerais." That specimen is here designated the second-step lectotype of *Rubia noxia*.

23. **GARDENIA** J. Ellis, *nom. cons.*, Philos. Trans. 51: 935, pl. 23. 1761.

FGT. vol. 40(1), p. 519:
"23-1. **Gardenia augusta** (L.) Merrill, Int. Herb. Amb. 485. 1917. - *Varneria augusta* L., Amoen. Acad. 4: 136. 1759. Tipo: Cultivada no jardim do Sr. Richard Warner, em Woodfoot Race (Perto de Londres), trazida pelo

Capitão Hutchinson desde o Cabo de Boa Esperança [daí a origem do nome comum da planta] (holótipo, BM-LINN)."

**Accepted name:** *Gardenia jasminoides* J. Ellis, Philos. Trans. 51: 935, pl. 23. 1761.

**Correct citation:** *Gardenia augusta* (L.) E.D. Merrill, *nom. illeg. superfl.*, Int. Herb. Amb. 485. 1917. - *Varneria augusta* L., *nom. illeg.*, Amoen. Acad. 4: 136. 1759.

Type: [icon]: Rumphius, Herb. Amboin. 7: 26, tab. 14, fig. 2, "Catsjopiri". 1755, lectotype designated by Smith in Amer. J. Bot. 61: 113. 1974.

**Notes:** Jarvis (2007: 914), regarding *Varneria augusta* L., presented the following explanation "This name is invalid because the genus *Varneria* was given no separate generic description. Under Art. 42.1 [now Art. 38.5 (Turland et al. 2018)], the names of a genus and a species may not be simultaneously validated by a reference to an earlier description or diagnosis, as occurred here. However, some authors (e.g. Merrill 1917: 486) have treated this as the basionym of *G*. [*Gardenia*] *augusta* (L.) Merrill, wrongly interpreted as the correct name for the species otherwise known as *G. jasminoides* J. Ellis (1761)."

24. **GENIPA** L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10, 2: 931. 1759.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 524:
"24-1. **Genipa americana** L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10, 2: 931. 1759. Tipo: Brasil, Pernambuco, Rio São Francisco, "Mboacica" [provavelmente Boa Cica], J. Marcgrave, Hist. Nat. Bras. 92. 1642 (lectótipo, designado por Howard, 1989)."

**Accepted name:** *Genipa americana* L.

Type: [icon] "Ianipaba Brasiliensibus, seu ut Lusitani efferunt Ienipapo: figura convenit Fago", Piso & Marcggraf, Hist. Rer. Nat. Bras., p. 92. 1648, lectotype designated by Howard in Fl. Lesser Antilles 6: 413. 1989.

**Notes:** The lectotype designated by Howard (1989) is here followed. Piso and Marcggraf's table of "Ianipaba Brasiliensibus..." is reproduced on page 148 of Jarvis' (2007) *Order Out of Chaos*.
*Hilaire* 556 (first-step lectotype designated by Dempster (1990: 292); P [barcode P00723673], **second-step lectotype here designated**).

**Note:** Auguste de Saint-Hilaire (1824: 229) cited the collection locality of the material studied of *Rubia noxia* A. St. Hil. as "Crescit in sylvis primaevis provinciae Minas Gerais. Floret Februario-Martio" and did not cite the collection number. Dempster (1990: 292) cited the type of *R. noxia* as "Brazil: Minas Gerais, *St. Hilaire* 556" (B holotype, destroyed, photos at F, GH)." It is unknown to me why she cited as holotype a specimen at B that was destroyed during WWII, as she certainly knew that Saint-Hilaire's original material is at P. It is possible that her citation is a typographical error, as she wrote "B" but she probably intended to write "P". However, this seems to be unlikely because, as she stated that it was destroyed, which indicates that she intended to write that the specimen was at B. Therefore, Dempster's citation can only be interpreted as a first-step inadvertent lectotypification because she cited *Saint-Hilaire* 556 as type.

Auguste de Saint-Hilaire worked at P, hence this is the institution where his original specimens should be found. Delprete (2010a: 511) cited as holotype a specimen of *Saint Hilaire* 556 at P. Such citation cannot be interpreted as a second-step lectotypification because after 2001 it should have been accompanied by "here designated" or a similar expression. At P there are several original specimens of *Rubia noxia* collected by A. Saint-Hilaire in Brazil, and only one of them has collection number 556. That specimen, with barcode P00723673, consists of several branches with flowers and fruits. On the bottom left corner of the sheet is affixed a label with the annotation "Rubia noxia Aug. de S¹ Hil. - Bois à Itapuera paroisse de St Miguel de Mato Dentro (A. de St. Hilaire Script.)" handwritten by Saint-Hilaire. On the upper left corner of the sheet there is a label with the heading "Herbarium Musei Parisiensis" and the penciled annotation "Type = St. Hilaire 556, n. date, Minas Gerais." That specimen is here designated the second-step lectotype of *Rubia noxia*.

23. **GARDENIA** J. Ellis, *nom. cons.*, Philos. Trans. 51: 935, pl. 23. 1761.

FGT. vol. 40(1), p. 519:
"23-1. **Gardenia augusta** (L.) Merrill, Int. Herb. Amb. 485. 1917. - *Varneria augusta* L., Amoen. Acad. 4: 136. 1759. Tipo: Cultivada no jardim do Sr. Richard Warner, em Woodfoot Race (Perto de Londres), trazida pelo

Capitão Hutchinson desde o Cabo de Boa Esperança [daí a origem do nome comum da planta] (holótipo, BM-LINN)."

**Accepted name:** *Gardenia jasminoides* J. Ellis, Philos. Trans. 51: 935, pl. 23. 1761.

**Correct citation:** *Gardenia augusta* (L.) E.D. Merrill, *nom. illeg. superfl.*, Int. Herb. Amb. 485. 1917. - *Varneria augusta* L., *nom. illeg.*, Amoen. Acad. 4: 136. 1759.

Type: [icon]: Rumphius, Herb. Amboin. 7: 26, tab. 14, fig. 2, "Catsjopiri". 1755, lectotype designated by Smith in Amer. J. Bot. 61: 113. 1974.

**Notes:** Jarvis (2007: 914), regarding *Varneria augusta* L., presented the following explanation "This name is invalid because the genus *Varneria* was given no separate generic description. Under Art. 42.1 [now Art. 38.5 (Turland et al. 2018)], the names of a genus and a species may not be simultaneously validated by a reference to an earlier description or diagnosis, as occurred here. However, some authors (e.g. Merrill 1917: 486) have treated this as the basionym of *G*. [*Gardenia*] *augusta* (L.) Merrill, wrongly interpreted as the correct name for the species otherwise known as *G. jasminoides* J. Ellis (1761)."

24. **GENIPA** L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10, 2: 931. 1759.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 524:
"24-1. **Genipa americana** L., Syst. Nat. ed. 10, 2: 931. 1759. Tipo: Brasil, Pernambuco, Rio São Francisco, "Mboacica" [provavelmente Boa Cica], J. Marcgrave, Hist. Nat. Bras. 92. 1642 (lectótipo, designado por Howard, 1989)."

**Accepted name:** *Genipa americana* L.

Type: [icon] "Ianipaba Brasiliensibus, seu ut Lusitani efferunt Ienipapo: figura convenit Fago", Piso & Marcggraf, Hist. Rer. Nat. Bras., p. 92. 1648, lectotype designated by Howard in Fl. Lesser Antilles 6: 413. 1989.

**Notes:** The lectotype designated by Howard (1989) is here followed. Piso and Marcggraf's table of "Ianipaba Brasiliensibus..." is reproduced on page 148 of Jarvis' (2007) *Order Out of Chaos*.
FGT. vol. 40(1), p. 531:
"24-2. *Genipa spruceana* Steyerm., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 23: 353. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Amapá, Lago Cujumbim, 10/VIII/1962 (fl, fr), *J. Murça Pires & P. Cavalcante* 52451 (holótipo, NY; isótipo, K n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Genipa spruceana* Steyerm.

Type: BRAZIL. Amapá: Lago Cujumbim, 10 Aug. 1962 (fl, fr), *J. Murça Pires & P. Cavalcante* 52451 (holotype, NY [without barcode (on loan to GB)]; isotypes, COL [COL000004605], K [2 sheets, barcodes K000424492, K000424488], US [barcode 00138106]).

25. **GEOPHILA** D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal 136. 1825, *nom. cons.*

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 536:
"25-1. *Geophila repens* (L.) I. M. Johnst., Sargentia 8: 281. 1949. - *Rondeletia repens* L., Syst. 928. 1759. - *Carinata repens* (L.) Smith & Downs, Sellowia 7: 65, fig. 22 g-j. 1956. - Tipo: Jamaica (Violae folio baccifera repens, flore albo pentapetaloide, fructu dispermo) Sloane, Jam. Cat. 115. 1696 and Hist. 1: 243, n. 42 (BM-LINN)."

**Accepted name:** *Geophila repens* (L.) I.M.Johnst.

Type: Sloane Herb. vol. 4: 111 (BM [barcode 000589966]), lectotype designated by Howard in Fl. Lesser Antilles 6: 416. 1989).

26. **GONZALAGUNIA** Ruiz & Pav., Prodr. 12. 1794.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 542:
"26-1. *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 4: 194. 1829. - *Gonzalea dicocca* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Steud., Nom. ed. 2, 1: 701. 1840. - *Gonzalagunia hirsuta* (Jacq.) K. Schum. var. dicocca (Cham. & Schltdl.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 292, t. 131. 1889. Tipo: Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Sellow s.n. (holótipo B, destruído)."

**Accepted name:** *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl.

Type: BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (K [barcode K000424262], **neotype here designated**).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl., Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b:

194) cited the material studied as "E Brasilia aequi-
notialis misit Sellow; in vicinis urbis Rio de Janeiro
lectam." The original material at B was destroyed dur-
ing WWII, and apparently there is no extant speci-
men in any herbarium that have been studied by the
original authors. There is a specimen at K, barcode
K000424262, which has been annotated by Bertil Ståhl
as possible original material of this name. On the sheet
it is handwritten "Sello. Brazil" in ink, and "Gonzalea"
in pencil. That specimen is here designated as the neo-
type of *G. dicocca*.

27. **GUETTARDA** L., Sp. Pl. 991. 1773.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 548:
"27-1. *Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 450, 456. 1875. - Sintipos: Goiás, *Burchell* 6453 (G n.v.); Minas Gerais, Uberaba, *Regnell* 103 (G n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda pohliana* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Uberaba, 18 Sep. 1848, *A.F. Regnell III.103* (BR [barcode 000000530542], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes BR [barcode 000000552316], G [barcode G00413560], R [barcode R000140146], S [Acc. No. S10-27705], S [Acc. No. S10-27713]; isolectotype fragments F [(ex C) Acc. Nos. 656026, 606865]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg., Müller Argoviensis (1875: 450, 456) cited two gatherings as "Goyaz: Burchell n. 6453, [Minas Gerais] Uberaba: Regnell n. 103." The gathering that has duplicates in more herbaria is *Regnell III.103*, which are described and discussed below.

A specimen at BR, with barcode 000000530542, has three labels. One label has the annotation "III.103. Ad Uberaba. In Minas Gerais, Brasiliae. Leg. Novbr "Arnequer" [?], Incolis: veludo do vermelho [vernacular name: red velvet, referring to the texture and color of the fruits]" with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. Coll. Martii." Another label has the printed text "Brasiliae prov. Minarum ad Uberaba (with "Caldas" stroke through), Communic. Andr. Frid. Regnell 1867, sub No. III.103" and has the stamps "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. Coll. Martii" and "Mueller d'Argovie determ." A third label has the handwritten annotation "Guettarda burchelliana Müll-Arg." The specimen consists of a ramified branch with several leaves and several inflorescences, and a smaller branch with several inflorescences. This specimen, with the stamp confirming that was examined by Müller
FGT. vol. 40(1), p. 531:
"24-2. *Genipa spruceana* Steyerm., Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 23: 353. 1972. Tipo: Brasil, Amapá, Lago Cujumbim, 10/VIII/1962 (fl, fr), *J. Murça Pires & P. Cavalcante* 52451 (holótipo, NY; isótipo, K n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Genipa spruceana* Steyerm.

Type: BRAZIL. Amapá: Lago Cujumbim, 10 Aug. 1962 (fl, fr), *J. Murça Pires & P. Cavalcante* 52451 (holotype, NY [without barcode (on loan to GB)]; isotypes, COL [COL000004605], K [2 sheets, barcodes K000424492, K000424488], US [barcode 00138106]).

25. **GEOPHILA** D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal 136. 1825, *nom. cons.*

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 536:
"25-1. *Geophila repens* (L.) I. M. Johnst., Sargentia 8: 281. 1949. - *Rondeletia repens* L., Syst. 928. 1759. - *Carinata repens* (L.) Smith & Downs, Sellowia 7: 65, fig. 22 g-j. 1956. - Tipo: Jamaica (Violae folio baccifera repens, flore albo pentapetaloide, fructu dispermo) Sloane, Jam. Cat. 115. 1696 and Hist. 1: 243, n. 42 (BM-LINN)."

**Accepted name:** *Geophila repens* (L.) I.M.Johnst.

Type: Sloane Herb. vol. 4: 111 (BM [barcode 000589966]), lectotype designated by Howard in Fl. Lesser Antilles 6: 416. 1989).

26. **GONZALAGUNIA** Ruiz & Pav., Prodr. 12. 1794.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 542:
"26-1. *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 4: 194. 1829. - *Gonzalea dicocca* (Cham. & Schltdl.) Steud., Nom. ed. 2, 1: 701. 1840. - *Gonzalagunia hirsuta* (Jacq.) K. Schum. var. dicocca (Cham. & Schltdl.) K. Schum. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(6): 292, t. 131. 1889. Tipo: Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Sellow s.n. (holótipo B, destruído)."

**Accepted name:** *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl.

Type: BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (K [barcode K000424262], **neotype here designated**).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Gonzalagunia dicocca* Cham. & Schltdl., Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b:

194) cited the material studied as "E Brasilia aequi-
notialis misit Sellow; in vicinis urbis Rio de Janeiro
lectam." The original material at B was destroyed dur-
ing WWII, and apparently there is no extant speci-
men in any herbarium that have been studied by the
original authors. There is a specimen at K, barcode
K000424262, which has been annotated by Bertil Ståhl
as possible original material of this name. On the sheet
it is handwritten "Sello. Brazil" in ink, and "Gonzalea"
in pencil. That specimen is here designated as the neo-
type of *G. dicocca*.

27. **GUETTARDA** L., Sp. Pl. 991. 1773.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 548:
"27-1. *Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 450, 456. 1875. - Sintipos: Goiás, *Burchell* 6453 (G n.v.); Minas Gerais, Uberaba, *Regnell* 103 (G n.v.)."

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda pohliana* Müll. Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Uberaba, 18 Sep. 1848, *A.F. Regnell III.103* (BR [barcode 000000530542], **lectotype here designated**; isolectotypes BR [barcode 000000552316], G [barcode G00413560], R [barcode R000140146], S [Acc. No. S10-27705], S [Acc. No. S10-27713]; isolectotype fragments F [(ex C) Acc. Nos. 656026, 606865]).

**Notes:** In the protologue of *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg., Müller Argoviensis (1875: 450, 456) cited two gatherings as "Goyaz: Burchell n. 6453, [Minas Gerais] Uberaba: Regnell n. 103." The gathering that has duplicates in more herbaria is *Regnell III.103*, which are described and discussed below.

A specimen at BR, with barcode 000000530542, has three labels. One label has the annotation "III.103. Ad Uberaba. In Minas Gerais, Brasiliae. Leg. Novbr "Arnequer" [?], Incolis: veludo do vermelho [vernacular name: red velvet, referring to the texture and color of the fruits]" with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. Coll. Martii." Another label has the printed text "Brasiliae prov. Minarum ad Uberaba (with "Caldas" stroke through), Communic. Andr. Frid. Regnell 1867, sub No. III.103" and has the stamps "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. Coll. Martii" and "Mueller d'Argovie determ." A third label has the handwritten annotation "Guettarda burchelliana Müll-Arg." The specimen consists of a ramified branch with several leaves and several inflorescences, and a smaller branch with several inflorescences. This specimen, with the stamp confirming that was examined by Müller
Argoviensis, is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A sheet at F with Accession No. 656026, has an envelope with the typewritten annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Brazil: Uberaba, Minas Geraes, A. F. Regnell III.103, Sept. 1848, Ex. hb. Copenh.” In the envelope are included one leaf and one inflorescence. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A second sheet at F, with Accession No. 606865, has an envelope with the handwritten annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Arg. α nitens M. Arg., Uberaba, Minas Geraes, Brazil, Regnell 103.” In the envelope are included two leaves and a few young flower buds. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

The S specimen with Accession No. S10-27705, has a label with the heading “Ex herb. Brasil. Regnellian. Musei bot. Stockholm” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda, Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. A.F. Regnell.” The specimen consists of a ramified branch with many leaves and numerous inflorescences. It was annotated as *Guettarda pohliana* by M.R. Barbosa in 2010 and is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

The second S specimen, with Accession No. S10-27713, has a label with the heading “Mus. Bot. Holm. Herb. Brasil. Regnelli” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. (Velludo do vermelho incolar.), Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. R. [Regnell]” The specimen is constituted by a branch with many leaves and numerous inflorescences. The sheet was annotated by M.R. Barbosa in 2010 as *Guettarda pohliana*, and is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A specimen in R, with barcode R000140146, has a label with the heading “Ex herb. Brasil. Regnellian. Musei bot. Stockholm” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda, Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. A.F. Regnell.” The specimen consists of several branches and inflorescence with flowers in anthesis and flower buds. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

In G there is a sheet with a small envelope with the annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Arg. α nitens, Goyaz: Burch. n. 6453. Ramus major: Uberaba: Regnell 103” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. That envelope originally contained two collections. The portion with a branch with flowers, *Regnell 103*, collected in Uberaba, have remained in that envelope and was assigned barcode G00413560, and is an isolectotype. The two leaves and the fruit that were included in the original envelope were separated from it and included in another envelope, which is now affixed on the sheet with barcode G00413561.

Barbosa (2007: 347) treated *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. as a synonym of *G. pohliana* Müll. Arg., without explanation. Delprete (2010a: 548), maintained

the two species as distinct, using corolla and fruit size as diagnostic characters. As a result of a morphological comparison of specimens from throughout their geographic range, I concluded that Barbosa was correct in treating these two names are synonymous, and the name to be used for this species is *G. pohliana*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 549:

**Synonym:**

*“Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg. var. *nitens* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 25. 1881, **syn. nov.** Synthpos: Goiás, *Burchell 6453* (G n.v.); São Paulo, “Villa de Batataes”, *Regnell 103*\* (G n.v.); Minas Gerais, Uberaba, *Regnell 103* (G n.v.).”

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda pohliana* Müll. Arg.

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. var. *nitens* Müll. Arg. cited several syntypes “Habitat prope urbem Goyaz: Burchell n. 6453; in prov. S. Paulo ad villa de Batataes: Regnell n. 103\*; in prov. Minas Geraës prope Uberaba: Regnell n. 103.”

This varietal name is invalid because according to Art. 26.2 of the *Code* “A name of an infraspecific taxon that includes the type (i.e. the holotype or all syntypes or the previously designated type) of the adopted, legitimate name of the species to which it is assigned is not validly published unless its final epithet repeats the specific epithet unaltered.” Because *Regnell III.103*, from Uberaba, Minas Gerais, was cited among the original specimens of *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll.Arg., this varietal name is invalid, and it does not have a type.

A BR sheets, with barcode 000000552316, has one label with the annotation "III.103X Nº. 1 Batataes - Prov. St. Pauli" handwritten by Regnell. On the same sheet is affixed a second label with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. - Coll. Martii", the stamp "Mueller d'Argovie determ.", and the annotations "Brasiliae prov. S. Pauli, Villa Batataes [with "Minarum ad Caldas" stroke through], Communic. Andr. Frid. Regnell 1867, sub. Nº IIIX." Because *Regnell III.103X* is from Batataes, state of São Paulo, a locality not reported for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg., this specimen is original material of the invalid name *G. burchelliana* var. *nitens*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 549:

**Synonym:**

*“Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg. var. *opaca* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 25. 1881, **syn. nov.** Tipo:
Argoviensis, is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A sheet at F with Accession No. 656026, has an envelope with the typewritten annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Brazil: Uberaba, Minas Geraes, A. F. Regnell III.103, Sept. 1848, Ex. hb. Copenh.” In the envelope are included one leaf and one inflorescence. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A second sheet at F, with Accession No. 606865, has an envelope with the handwritten annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Arg. α nitens M. Arg., Uberaba, Minas Geraes, Brazil, Regnell 103.” In the envelope are included two leaves and a few young flower buds. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

The S specimen with Accession No. S10-27705, has a label with the heading “Ex herb. Brasil. Regnellian. Musei bot. Stockholm” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda, Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. A.F. Regnell.” The specimen consists of a ramified branch with many leaves and numerous inflorescences. It was annotated as *Guettarda pohliana* by M.R. Barbosa in 2010 and is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

The second S specimen, with Accession No. S10-27713, has a label with the heading “Mus. Bot. Holm. Herb. Brasil. Regnelli” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. (Velludo do vermelho incolar.), Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. R. [Regnell]” The specimen is constituted by a branch with many leaves and numerous inflorescences. The sheet was annotated by M.R. Barbosa in 2010 as *Guettarda pohliana*, and is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

A specimen in R, with barcode R000140146, has a label with the heading “Ex herb. Brasil. Regnellian. Musei bot. Stockholm” and the annotation “No. III 103, Guettarda, Prov. Minas Geraes, Uberaba, 18/9/48. A.F. Regnell.” The specimen consists of several branches and inflorescence with flowers in anthesis and flower buds. This specimen is an isolectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana*.

In G there is a sheet with a small envelope with the annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana Müll. Arg. α nitens, Goyaz: Burch. n. 6453. Ramus major: Uberaba: Regnell 103” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. That envelope originally contained two collections. The portion with a branch with flowers, *Regnell 103*, collected in Uberaba, have remained in that envelope and was assigned barcode G00413560, and is an isolectotype. The two leaves and the fruit that were included in the original envelope were separated from it and included in another envelope, which is now affixed on the sheet with barcode G00413561.

Barbosa (2007: 347) treated *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. as a synonym of *G. pohliana* Müll. Arg., without explanation. Delprete (2010a: 548), maintained

the two species as distinct, using corolla and fruit size as diagnostic characters. As a result of a morphological comparison of specimens from throughout their geographic range, I concluded that Barbosa was correct in treating these two names are synonymous, and the name to be used for this species is *G. pohliana*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 549:

**Synonym:**

“*Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg. var. *nitens* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 25. 1881, **syn. nov.** Synthpos: Goiás, *Burchell 6453* (G n.v.); São Paulo, “Villa de Batataes”, *Regnell 103*\* (G n.v.); Minas Gerais, Uberaba, *Regnell 103* (G n.v.).”

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda pohliana* Müll. Arg.

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. var. *nitens* Müll. Arg. cited several syntypes “Habitat prope urbem Goyaz: Burchell n. 6453; in prov. S. Paulo ad villa de Batataes: Regnell n. 103\*; in prov. Minas Geraës prope Uberaba: Regnell n. 103.”

This varietal name is invalid because according to Art. 26.2 of the *Code* “A name of an infraspecific taxon that includes the type (i.e. the holotype or all syntypes or the previously designated type) of the adopted, legitimate name of the species to which it is assigned is not validly published unless its final epithet repeats the specific epithet unaltered.” Because *Regnell III.103*, from Uberaba, Minas Gerais, was cited among the original specimens of *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll.Arg., this varietal name is invalid, and it does not have a type.

A BR sheets, with barcode 000000552316, has one label with the annotation "III.103X Nº. 1 Batataes - Prov. St. Pauli" handwritten by Regnell. On the same sheet is affixed a second label with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell. - Coll. Martii", the stamp "Mueller d'Argovie determ.", and the annotations "Brasiliae prov. S. Pau-li, Villa Batataes [with "Minarum ad Caldas" stroke through], Communic. Andr. Frid. Regnell 1867, sub. Nº IIIX." Because *Regnell III.103X* is from Batataes, state of São Paulo, a locality not reported for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg., this specimen is original material of the invalid name *G. burchelliana* var. *nitens*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 549:

**Synonym:**

“*Guettarda burchelliana* Muell. Arg. var. *opaca* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 25. 1881, **syn. nov.** Tipo:
Goiás, “prope urbem Goyaz” [agora cidade de Goiás], *Burchell 6447* (G n.v.).”

Accepted name: *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Town of Goiás, s.d., *W.J. Burchell 6447* (BR [barcode 000000530477], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes G [barcode G00413562], K [barcode K000424803]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. var. *opaca* Müll. Arg. cited a single gathering as “Habitat prope urbem Goyaz: Burchell n. 6447.” I was able trace three specimens of *Burchell 6447*, which are discussed below.

A BR sheet, with barcode 000000530477, has a label with the annotation “Guettarda burchelliana β opaca Müll. Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen consists of one branch with two leaves and several inflorescences and is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana* var. *opaca*.

On a sheet at K, with barcode K000424803, not annotated by Müller Argoviensis, is affixed a specimen of *Burchell 6447* that consists of one branch with several leaves and several inflorescences, which is an isolectotype. On the same sheet is mounted a specimen of *Burchell 6453*, with barcode K000424804.

On a G sheet, with barcode G00413562, is affixed an envelope containing a loose inflorescence, several loose flower buds, and one leaf. On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana β opaca Müll. Arg., Goyaz: Burchell n. 6447” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is an isolectotype.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 552:
“27-2. *Guettarda pohliana* Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 450, 456. 1875. - Sintipos: Brasil, Goiás, “Goyaz, Vila Boa” [agora cidade de Goiás], 1818-1819, *Pohl 883* (G, K, foto-K em NY), *Pohl 2048* (G).”

Accepted name: *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: “Villa Boa, Corallinho” [now the town of Goiás, locality Corralinho], s.d., [1818-1819], *J.B.E. Pohl 2048 (833d)* (W [2 sheets, Acc. Nos. W0004205, W0004206], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes K [2 sheets, barcodes K000424805, K000424806], NY [barcode 00131685]; dubious isolectotype G [barcode G00642009]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) described *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

as “7. Folia 7—13 cm lg., 4--6½ cm. lt., oblongo-ovata, subtus adpresso- et renitenti-vestita. Corolla 15—18 mm. lg., lobi 5—8.” and cited the gathering “Goyaz: Pohl 2048, 883”, where “2048” is the collection number, and “883” is the number in Pohl’s diary.

A sheet in W, Accession No. W0004205, has the annotation “Bogen 1 von 2”. On this sheet are affixed three labels. The label at the bottom right corner of the sheet has the handwritten annotations “2048, Hb. Bras., Villa Boa. Corallinho, (883d), Pohl.” Just above that label, is affixed another label with the annotation “Guettarda Pohliana Müll.-Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. Above those two label is the annotation “type of Guettarda pohliana Müll. Arg., 21/VII/2005, det./rev. M. Regina Barbosa” handwritten by Barbosa. A second sheet in W, Accession No. W0004206, has the annotation “Bogen 2 von 2”. On the second sheet are affixed three labels, with the same information of the other sheet. As these two sheets are kept together and are annotated as “1 of 2” and “2 of 2”, they are here treated as a single specimen with multiple preparations. In addition, the number “2048” represent Pohl’s collection number, and the number “883d” refers to Pohl’s Diary No. 883. Therefore, Pohl’s numbers 2048 and 883d refer to the same gathering. This specimen, mounted on two sheets, is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda pohliana*.

A specimen in NY, with barcode 00131685, has a label with the heading “Dupl. ex Herb. Musei Natur. Vindob.” and the handwritten annotation “Guettarda Pohliana Müll. Arg. Villa Boa. Corallinho, (883d) Pohl” and the stamp “Duplum ex Herb. Mus. Hist. Nat. Vindobon.” The specimen consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis.

A specimen in K, with barcode K000424805, consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. At the base of the stem is affixed a small label with the annotation “Brazil. Herb. Mus. Vind.” handwritten directly on the sheet by an unknown author, and a small label with the number “883”. The specimen is ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis.

A second K specimen, with barcode K000424806, consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. At the base of the stem is affixed a small label with the annotation “Nº 883, Brasilia, Herb. Mus. Vind. 1837”.

A sheet in G, with barcode G00642009, has an envelope affixed on it, containing a few loose leaves and inflorescences, one of them with flowers in anthesis.
Goiás, “prope urbem Goyaz” [agora cidade de Goiás], *Burchell 6447* (G n.v.).”

Accepted name: *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: Town of Goiás, s.d., *W.J. Burchell 6447* (BR [barcode 000000530477], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes G [barcode G00413562], K [barcode K000424803]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) for *Guettarda burchelliana* Müll. Arg. var. *opaca* Müll. Arg. cited a single gathering as “Habitat prope urbem Goyaz: Burchell n. 6447.” I was able trace three specimens of *Burchell 6447*, which are discussed below.

A BR sheet, with barcode 000000530477, has a label with the annotation “Guettarda burchelliana β opaca Müll. Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen consists of one branch with two leaves and several inflorescences and is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda burchelliana* var. *opaca*.

On a sheet at K, with barcode K000424803, not annotated by Müller Argoviensis, is affixed a specimen of *Burchell 6447* that consists of one branch with several leaves and several inflorescences, which is an isolectotype. On the same sheet is mounted a specimen of *Burchell 6453*, with barcode K000424804.

On a G sheet, with barcode G00413562, is affixed an envelope containing a loose inflorescence, several loose flower buds, and one leaf. On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda Burchelliana β opaca Müll. Arg., Goyaz: Burchell n. 6447” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is an isolectotype.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 552:
“27-2. *Guettarda pohliana* Muell. Arg., Flora 58: 450, 456. 1875. - Sintipos: Brasil, Goiás, “Goyaz, Vila Boa” [agora cidade de Goiás], 1818-1819, *Pohl 883* (G, K, foto-K em NY), *Pohl 2048* (G).”

Accepted name: *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

Type: BRAZIL. Goiás: “Villa Boa, Corallinho” [now the town of Goiás, locality Corralinho], s.d., [1818-1819], *J.B.E. Pohl 2048 (833d)* (W [2 sheets, Acc. Nos. W0004205, W0004206], *lectotype here designated*; isolectotypes K [2 sheets, barcodes K000424805, K000424806], NY [barcode 00131685]; dubious isolectotype G [barcode G00642009]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 25) described *Guettarda pohliana* Müll.Arg.

as “7. Folia 7—13 cm lg., 4--6½ cm. lt., oblongo-ovata, subtus adpresso- et renitenti-vestita. Corolla 15—18 mm. lg., lobi 5—8.” and cited the gathering “Goyaz: Pohl 2048, 883”, where “2048” is the collection number, and “883” is the number in Pohl’s diary.

A sheet in W, Accession No. W0004205, has the annotation “Bogen 1 von 2”. On this sheet are affixed three labels. The label at the bottom right corner of the sheet has the handwritten annotations “2048, Hb. Bras., Villa Boa. Corallinho, (883d), Pohl.” Just above that label, is affixed another label with the annotation “Guettarda Pohliana Müll.-Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. Above those two label is the annotation “type of Guettarda pohliana Müll. Arg., 21/VII/2005, det./rev. M. Regina Barbosa” handwritten by Barbosa. A second sheet in W, Accession No. W0004206, has the annotation “Bogen 2 von 2”. On the second sheet are affixed three labels, with the same information of the other sheet. As these two sheets are kept together and are annotated as “1 of 2” and “2 of 2”, they are here treated as a single specimen with multiple preparations. In addition, the number “2048” represent Pohl’s collection number, and the number “883d” refers to Pohl’s Diary No. 883. Therefore, Pohl’s numbers 2048 and 883d refer to the same gathering. This specimen, mounted on two sheets, is here designated the lectotype of *Guettarda pohliana*.

A specimen in NY, with barcode 00131685, has a label with the heading “Dupl. ex Herb. Musei Natur. Vindob.” and the handwritten annotation “Guettarda Pohliana Müll. Arg. Villa Boa. Corallinho, (883d) Pohl” and the stamp “Duplum ex Herb. Mus. Hist. Nat. Vindobon.” The specimen consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis.

A specimen in K, with barcode K000424805, consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. At the base of the stem is affixed a small label with the annotation “Brazil. Herb. Mus. Vind.” handwritten directly on the sheet by an unknown author, and a small label with the number “883”. The specimen is ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis.

A second K specimen, with barcode K000424806, consists of a ramified branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flowers in anthesis. At the base of the stem is affixed a small label with the annotation “Nº 883, Brasilia, Herb. Mus. Vind. 1837”.

A sheet in G, with barcode G00642009, has an envelope affixed on it, containing a few loose leaves and inflorescences, one of them with flowers in anthesis.
On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda pohliana Müll. Arg., Pohl” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. Because the collection number is not specified, this specimen is dubious original material.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
“27-3. **Guettarda viburnoides** Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 4: 182. 1829. Tipo: Brasil tropical, s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (B, destruído; foto em NY; lectótipo, P (ex B), aqui escolhido).”

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda viburnoides* Cham. & Schltdl.

Type: BRAZIL: “Brasilia tropica”, without locality, s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; P [ex B; barcode P00836586], lectotype designated by Delprete (2010a: 560); possible isolectotype G [barcode G00642010]; photo-B (F0BN000393) at NY).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b: 182) cited the material studied of *Guettarda viburnoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as “E Brasilia tropica misit Sellowius.” The original material in B was destroyed during WWII. The photograph (negative No. F0BN000393) of the destroyed B specimen shows a label with the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides N. Linn. 4. p. 182. Sellow. Brasilia.” Delprete (2010a: 560) designated as lectotype of this name a specimen at P (ex B). That specimen, with barcode P00836586, has a label with the heading “Ex Museu botanico Bero-linensi”, the handwritten annotation “Guettarda vibur-noides Ch. & Schl.”, the stamp “determ. C. Schumann”, and the printed note “Brasilia, Leg. Sellow.”

In G there is a sheet, with barcode G00642010, on which is affixed an envelope containing two loose leaves and an inflorescence with flower buds. The envelope has the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides Cham. & Schlechtdl.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is a possible isolectotype of *Guettarda viburnoides*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *pannosa* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 17. 1881, **syn. nov.** Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Minas Gerais [...]; Goiás, “inter Rio Paranahyba et urbem Goyaz” [entre Rio Paranaíba e cidade de Goiás], s.d., *Burchell 6251* (G n.v.).”

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Without locality, s.d., *P. Claussen s.n.* (G [barcode G00642012] lecto-

type here designated; isolectotypes G [G00642013, G00642014]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 17) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *pannosa* Müll. Arg. and cited several gatherings from different Brazilian states. In G there is no original specimen associated with this varietal name. Delprete (2010a: 560) cited an unseen specimen of *Burchell 6210* in G, but such a specimen is not there.

In G there are three sheets, with barcodes G00642012, G00642013 and G00642014. Those sheets have a label with the printed text “BRÉSIL. Minas Gerais. P. Claussen. *Iª envoi reçu en mars 1839.*” and the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides Ch. & Schlecht. var. pannosa Müll. Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen with barcode G00642012 is here designated as the lectotype of this varietal name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *genuina* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 18. 1881, **syn. nov.** Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Minas Gerais [...]; Bahia [...]; Tocantins, “Porto Real” [Porto Nacional], s.d., *Burchell 8669* (G n.v.); sem localidade, s.d., *Gardner 3216* (G n.v.).”

Type: BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Without locality, s.d., *Collector Unknown s.n.* (G [barcode G00642011], lectotype here designated).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 18) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *genuina* Müll.Arg. citing numerous gatherings from several Brazilian states. In G there is a sheet with barcode G00642011 on which is affixed an envelope containing several loose leaves, a loose inflorescence, several flowers in anthesis, and one fruit. On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides β genuina Müll. Arg., Rio de Janeiro” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. On the lower portion of the sheet is affixed a label with the annotation “G. viburnoides β genuina Müll. Arg.!” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is original material of *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *genuina*, and is here designated as the lectotype of this varietal name. However, *G. viburnoides* var. *genuina* is not a valid name (Art. 24.3, Turland et al., 2018).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *rhombifolia* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 18. 1881, **syn. nov.**
On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda pohliana Müll. Arg., Pohl” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. Because the collection number is not specified, this specimen is dubious original material.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
“27-3. **Guettarda viburnoides** Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 4: 182. 1829. Tipo: Brasil tropical, s.d., *Sellow s.n.* (B, destruído; foto em NY; lectótipo, P (ex B), aqui escolhido).”

**Accepted name:** *Guettarda viburnoides* Cham. & Schltdl.

Type: BRAZIL: “Brasilia tropica”, without locality, s.d., *F. Sellow s.n.* (B†; P [ex B; barcode P00836586], lectotype designated by Delprete (2010a: 560); possible isolectotype G [barcode G00642010]; photo-B (F0BN000393) at NY).

**Notes:** Chamisso and Schlechtendal (1829b: 182) cited the material studied of *Guettarda viburnoides* Cham. & Schltdl. as “E Brasilia tropica misit Sellowius.” The original material in B was destroyed during WWII. The photograph (negative No. F0BN000393) of the destroyed B specimen shows a label with the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides N. Linn. 4. p. 182. Sellow. Brasilia.” Delprete (2010a: 560) designated as lectotype of this name a specimen at P (ex B). That specimen, with barcode P00836586, has a label with the heading “Ex Museu botanico Bero-linensi”, the handwritten annotation “Guettarda viburnoides Ch. & Schl.”, the stamp “determ. C. Schumann”, and the printed note “Brasilia, Leg. Sellow.”

In G there is a sheet, with barcode G00642010, on which is affixed an envelope containing two loose leaves and an inflorescence with flower buds. The envelope has the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides Cham. & Schlechtdl.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is a possible isolectotype of *Guettarda viburnoides*.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *pannosa* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 17. 1881, **syn. nov.** Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Minas Gerais [...]; Goiás, “inter Rio Paranahyba et urbem Goyaz” [entre Rio Paranaíba e cidade de Goiás], s.d., *Burchell 6251* (G n.v.).”

Type: BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: Without locality, s.d., *P. Claussen s.n.* (G [barcode G00642012] lecto-

type here designated; isolectotypes G [G00642013, G00642014]).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 17) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *pannosa* Müll. Arg. and cited several gatherings from different Brazilian states. In G there is no original specimen associated with this varietal name. Delprete (2010a: 560) cited an unseen specimen of *Burchell 6210* in G, but such a specimen is not there.

In G there are three sheets, with barcodes G00642012, G00642013 and G00642014. Those sheets have a label with the printed text “BRÉSIL. Minas Gerais. P. Claussen. *Iª envoi reçu en mars 1839.*” and the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides Ch. & Schlecht. var. pannosa Müll. Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen with barcode G00642012 is here designated as the lectotype of this varietal name.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *genuina* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 18. 1881, **syn. nov.** Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Minas Gerais [...]; Bahia [...]; Tocantins, “Porto Real” [Porto Nacional], s.d., *Burchell 8669* (G n.v.); sem localidade, s.d., *Gardner 3216* (G n.v.).”

Type: BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Without locality, s.d., *Collector Unknown s.n.* (G [barcode G00642011], lectotype here designated).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 18) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *genuina* Müll.Arg. citing numerous gatherings from several Brazilian states. In G there is a sheet with barcode G00642011 on which is affixed an envelope containing several loose leaves, a loose inflorescence, several flowers in anthesis, and one fruit. On the envelope is the annotation “Guettarda viburnoides β genuina Müll. Arg.” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. On the lower portion of the sheet is affixed a label with the annotation “G. viburnoides β genuina Müll. Arg.!” handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. This specimen is original material of *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *genuina*, and is here designated as the lectotype of this varietal name. However, *G. viburnoides* var. *genuina* is not a valid name (Art. 24.3, Turland et al., 2018).

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 560:
**Synonym:**
“*Guettarda viburnoides* Muell. Arg. var. *rhombifolia* Muell. Arg. in Mart., Fl. Bras. 6(5): 18. 1881, **syn. nov.**
Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Ceará [...]; Tocantins, "inter Conceição et Natividade" [entre Conceição do Tocantins e Natividade], s.d., *Burchell 8229* (G n.v.)."

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: "inter Conceicao et Natividade" [between the towns of Natividade and Conceição do Tocantins], s.d., *J.W. Burchell 8229* (BR [barcode 000000531620], **lectotype here designated**).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 18) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *rhombifolia* Müll. Arg. and cited the material studied as "*Habitat in prov. Ceara: Gardner n. 1696; inter Conceicao et Natividade: Burchell n. 8229; prope Rio de Janeiro: Widgren n. 1038, Glaziou n. 711, 4021, Sello*."

A specimen in BR, barcode 000000531620, has a label with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell." and the handwritten annotation "Brasilia: inter Conceicao et Natividade, prov. Goyaz, communic. H. Kewense 1864, Burchell n° 8229." On the sheet is affixed a second label with the annotation "Guettarda viburnoides Ch. & Schl. α [r]hombifolia" handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen consists of a sterile branch with several leaves and a fertile branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flower in anthesis. This specimen is here designated the lectotype of this varietal name.

No original specimen associated with this name could be found in G.

28. **HAMELIA** Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 2, 16. 1760.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 577: "28-1. *Hamelia patens* Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 16. 1760. Tipo: Republica Dominicana, s.d., *Jacquin s.n.* (P? W? cf. Elias 1976:102)."

**Accepted name:** *Hamelia patens* Jacq.

Type: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. La Romana: La Uvita, S of town of Cumayasa, km 10, on Maribe coast, marine coral limestone, 18°24'N, 69°3'W, less than 10 m, 24 Nov. 1980 (fl, fr), *M. Mejía & T. Zanoni 9390* (NY [barcode 01326210], **neotype here designated**).

**Notes:** Nikolaus Joseph Jacquin (1760: 16) published *Hamelia patens* Jacq. with the sole description "racemis patentibus" without citing any locality or specimen. Elias (1976) indicated and discussed the possible original

material of *H. patens* as "Type. Domingo (Dominican Republic), Jacquin s.n. P? There is apparently some confusion as to the type locality. Standley in North American Flora cites the type locality as forests near Cartagena, Colombia." The initial description was made as a result of a voyage to the Greater Antilles and Colombia. Three years after *H. patens* was first published, Jacquin (1763: 72) published a lengthy description of this species and cited the following "Habitat in Domingo..." It appears that the type locality is the Dominican Republic rather than Colombia. A Cuban specimen labeled *H. patens* and collected by Jacquin was examined: Cuba, without exact locality, Jacquin s.n. (F fra.! ex Vienna)." (Elias, 1976: 81).

D'Arcy (1970) discussed in detail the fate of the Jacquin Herbarium and explained the difficulty of finding original material. He stated that "today there is no single "Jacquin Herbarium" but his specimens are to be found at Vienna [W], the Linnaean Herbarium [LINN], in the British Museum [BM], and some are dispersed in other European herbaria." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979: 407) "Sir Joseph Banks acquired Jacquin material. This is often referred in literature as the Jacquin herbarium. [...] It is difficult to find West Indian material collected by him. It is doubtful whether Jacquin brought home from the West Indies sizeable collections of dried plants. J.E. Dandy informed us that the Jacquin material from the West Indies in the Banks herbarium (now BM) is rare and consists of scraps or small specimens." See discussion also under *Coutarea hexandra*.

Delprete (2010a: 577), following Elias (1976), indicated that possible original material might be present in P or W. After an exhaustive search in both herbaria, no specimen of *Hamelia patens* attributable to Jacquin was found. Additional extensive searches were also conducted in the herbaria indicated by D'Arcy (1970), Elias (1976), and Stafleu and Cowan (1979), but no original specimen of *H. patens* was found. Therefore, a neotype needs to be selected for this name. The specimen *Mejía & Zanoni 9390* at NY, with barcode 01326210, collected in the Dominican Republic, has inflorescences with flowers and fruits, and is here designated the neotype of this name.

Cabral and Salas (2022d: 301) cited the type of *Hamelia patens* as "TIPO. Républica Dominicana [Santo Domingo], N. J. Jacquin s. n. (holotipo, P)," but there is no such specimen in P.

**Synonym:**

(=) *Schoenleinia thyrsoidea* Miers, Proc. Roy. Hort. Soc. 4: 186. 1864.
Sintipos: Rio de Janeiro [...]; Ceará [...]; Tocantins, "inter Conceição et Natividade" [entre Conceição do Tocantins e Natividade], s.d., *Burchell 8229* (G n.v.)."

Type: BRAZIL. Tocantins: "inter Conceicao et Natividade" [between the towns of Natividade and Conceição do Tocantins], s.d., *J.W. Burchell 8229* (BR [barcode 000000531620], **lectotype here designated**).

**Notes:** Müller Argoviensis (1881: 18) described *Guettarda viburnoides* var. *rhombifolia* Müll. Arg. and cited the material studied as "*Habitat in prov. Ceara: Gardner n. 1696; inter Conceicao et Natividade: Burchell n. 8229; prope Rio de Janeiro: Widgren n. 1038, Glaziou n. 711, 4021, Sello*."

A specimen in BR, barcode 000000531620, has a label with the stamp "Herb. Hort. Bruxell." and the handwritten annotation "Brasilia: inter Conceicao et Natividade, prov. Goyaz, communic. H. Kewense 1864, Burchell n° 8229." On the sheet is affixed a second label with the annotation "Guettarda viburnoides Ch. & Schl. α [r]hombifolia" handwritten by Müller Argoviensis. The specimen consists of a sterile branch with several leaves and a fertile branch with numerous leaves and inflorescences with flower buds and flower in anthesis. This specimen is here designated the lectotype of this varietal name.

No original specimen associated with this name could be found in G.

28. **HAMELIA** Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 2, 16. 1760.

FGT, vol. 40(1), p. 577: "28-1. *Hamelia patens* Jacq., Enum. Pl. Carib. 16. 1760. Tipo: Republica Dominicana, s.d., *Jacquin s.n.* (P? W? cf. Elias 1976:102)."

**Accepted name:** *Hamelia patens* Jacq.

Type: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. La Romana: La Uvita, S of town of Cumayasa, km 10, on Maribe coast, marine coral limestone, 18°24'N, 69°3'W, less than 10 m, 24 Nov. 1980 (fl, fr), *M. Mejía & T. Zanoni 9390* (NY [barcode 01326210], **neotype here designated**).

**Notes:** Nikolaus Joseph Jacquin (1760: 16) published *Hamelia patens* Jacq. with the sole description "racemis patentibus" without citing any locality or specimen. Elias (1976) indicated and discussed the possible original

material of *H. patens* as "Type. Domingo (Dominican Republic), Jacquin s.n. P? There is apparently some confusion as to the type locality. Standley in North American Flora cites the type locality as forests near Cartagena, Colombia." The initial description was made as a result of a voyage to the Greater Antilles and Colombia. Three years after *H. patens* was first published, Jacquin (1763: 72) published a lengthy description of this species and cited the following "Habitat in Domingo..." It appears that the type locality is the Dominican Republic rather than Colombia. A Cuban specimen labeled *H. patens* and collected by Jacquin was examined: Cuba, without exact locality, Jacquin s.n. (F fra.! ex Vienna)." (Elias, 1976: 81).

D'Arcy (1970) discussed in detail the fate of the Jacquin Herbarium and explained the difficulty of finding original material. He stated that "today there is no single "Jacquin Herbarium" but his specimens are to be found at Vienna [W], the Linnaean Herbarium [LINN], in the British Museum [BM], and some are dispersed in other European herbaria." According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979: 407) "Sir Joseph Banks acquired Jacquin material. This is often referred in literature as the Jacquin herbarium. [...] It is difficult to find West Indian material collected by him. It is doubtful whether Jacquin brought home from the West Indies sizeable collections of dried plants. J.E. Dandy informed us that the Jacquin material from the West Indies in the Banks herbarium (now BM) is rare and consists of scraps or small specimens." See discussion also under *Coutarea hexandra*.

Delprete (2010a: 577), following Elias (1976), indicated that possible original material might be present in P or W. After an exhaustive search in both herbaria, no specimen of *Hamelia patens* attributable to Jacquin was found. Additional extensive searches were also conducted in the herbaria indicated by D'Arcy (1970), Elias (1976), and Stafleu and Cowan (1979), but no original specimen of *H. patens* was found. Therefore, a neotype needs to be selected for this name. The specimen *Mejía & Zanoni 9390* at NY, with barcode 01326210, collected in the Dominican Republic, has inflorescences with flowers and fruits, and is here designated the neotype of this name.

Cabral and Salas (2022d: 301) cited the type of *Hamelia patens* as "TIPO. Républica Dominicana [Santo Domingo], N. J. Jacquin s. n. (holotipo, P)," but there is no such specimen in P.

**Synonym:**

(=) *Schoenleinia thyrsoidea* Miers, Proc. Roy. Hort. Soc. 4: 186. 1864.