# Comparison between Arabidopsis and Rice for Main Pathways of K+ and Na+ Uptake by Roots

Manuel Nieves Cordones, Vicente Martínez, Begoña Benito, Francisco Rubio

► To cite this version:

Manuel Nieves Cordones, Vicente Martínez, Begoña Benito, Francisco Rubio. Comparison between Arabidopsis and Rice for Main Pathways of K+ and Na+ Uptake by Roots. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7, pp.992. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00992. hal-01512228

HAL Id: hal-01512228

https://hal.science/hal-01512228

Submitted on 21 Apr 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Comparison between Arabidopsis and rice for main pathways of K+ and Na+ uptake by roots

Manuel Nieves-Cordones², Vicente Martinez<fnref n="1" />, Begona Benito<fnref n="3" />, Francisco Rubio<fnref n="1" />*

**Submitted to Journal:**

Frontiers in Plant Science

**Specialty Section:**

Plant Physiology

**ISSN:**

1664-462X

**Article type:**

Review Article

**Received on:**

31 Mar 2016

**Accepted on:**

22 Jun 2016

**Provisional PDF published on:**

22 Jun 2016

**Frontiers website link:**

www.frontiersin.org

**Citation:**

Nieves-cordones M, Martinez V, Benito B and Rubio F (2016) Comparison between Arabidopsis and rice for main pathways of K+ and Na+ uptake by roots. *Front. Plant Sci.* 7:992.
doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00992

**Copyright statement:**

© 2016 Nieves-cordones, Martinez, Benito and Rubio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

<footnote n="1">¹Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura-CSIC, Spain, ²Biochimie et Physiologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Institut de Biologie Intégrative des Plantes, France,</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain</footnote>
Provisional
1 Comparison between Arabidopsis and rice for main pathways of K⁺ and Na⁺

2 uptake by roots

3

4 Manuel Nieves-Cordones¹, Vicente Martínez², Begoña Benito³ and Francisco Rubio²*

5

6 ¹Biochimie et Physiologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Institut de Biologie Intégrative des

7 Plantes, UMR 5004 CNRS/UMR 0386 INRA/Montpellier SupAgro/Université

8 Montpellier 2, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 2, France

9

10 ²Departamento de Nutrición Vegetal, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del

11 Segura-CSIC. Campus de Espinardo, 3100 Murcia, Spain

12

13 ³Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,

14 Madrid, Spain.

15

16 *Corresponding author:

17 Francisco Rubio

18 frubio@cebas.csic.es

19

20

21 Abstract

22 K⁺ is an essential macronutrient for plants. It is acquired by specific uptake systems

23 located in roots. Although the concentrations of K⁺ in the soil solution are widely

24 variable, K⁺ nutrition is secured by uptake systems that exhibit different affinities for

25 K⁺. Two main systems have been described for root K⁺ uptake in several species: the

26 high-affinity HAK5-like transporter and the inward-rectifier AKT1-like channel. Other

27 unidentified systems may be also involved in root K⁺ uptake, although they only seem

28 to operate when K⁺ is not limiting. The use of knock-out lines has allowed

29 demonstrating their role in root K⁺ uptake in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant adaptation to

30 the different K⁺ supplies relies on the finely-tuned regulation of these systems. Low K⁺-

31 induced transcriptional up-regulation of the genes encoding HAK5-like transporters

32 occurs through a signal cascade that includes changes in the membrane potential of root

33 cells and increases in ethylene and reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentrations.
34

Activation of AKT1 channels occurs through phosphorylation by the CIPK23/CBL1 complex. Recently, activation of the Arabidopsis HAK5 by the same complex has been reported, pointing to CIPK23/CBL as a central regulator of the plant's adaptation to low K⁺.

35

36

37

Na⁺ is not an essential plant nutrient but it may be beneficial for some plants. At low concentrations, Na⁺ improves growth, especially under K⁺ deficiency. Thus, high-affinity Na⁺ uptake systems have been described that belong to the HKT and HAK families of transporters. At high concentrations, typical of saline environments, Na⁺ accumulates in plant tissues at high concentrations, producing alterations that include toxicity, water deficit and K⁺ deficiency. Data concerning pathways for Na⁺ uptake into roots under saline conditions are still scarce, although several possibilities have been proposed. The apoplast is a significant pathway for Na⁺ uptake in rice grown under salinity conditions, but in other plant species different mechanisms involving non-selective cation channels or transporters are under discussion.

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

**Keywords:** Potassium, sodium, uptake, roots, Arabidopsis, rice

50

Provisional
**Introduction**

Given the constant increase in world population, high-yield crop production has become a necessity for agriculture. As that the nutrient sources of the land are limited, the input of nutrients by the addition of fertilizers ensures a continuous supply for plants, circumventing reductions in plant yield. The use of fertilizers has raised crop yield considerably, for example, from 50% to 80% of wheat and corn grain yield is attributable to nutrient fertilization (Stewart et al., 2005). However this practice comes with high economic and environmental costs.

Potassium (K+) is an essential macronutrient that is required by plants to complete their life cycle (Taiz and Zeiger, 1991). K+ can make up to 10% of the total plant dry weight (Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984) and fulfils important functions for metabolism, growth and stress adaptation. Specifically, it acts as an enzyme activator, protein synthesis stabilizer, neutralization of protein negative charges and it participates in cytoplasmic pH homeostasis as well (Marschner, 2012). An optimal K+ concentration in the cytosol of around 100 mM is required for the performing of the functions mentioned above (Jones, 1983), and plant cells maintain the cytosolic K+ concentration around this value (Walker et al., 1996).

K+ constitutes about 2.9 % of the earth's crust but the concentration of K+ in the soil solution is highly variable, in the $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-3}$ M range (Barraclough, 1989; Marschner, 2012). Since roots are able to take up K+ at a higher rate than this cation can diffuse from the bulk soil solution, a K+ depletion zone near the root surface can be formed with K+ concentrations of just a few µM (Baldwin et al., 1973; Claassen and Jungk, 1982). More importantly, increasing areas of the world are currently described as being K+ deficient for agricultural practices (Mengel et al., 2001; Moody and Bell, 2006; Römheld and Kirkby, 2010; Kirkby and Schubert, 2013).

K+ deficiency has a negative impact on plant growth since cellular expansion and photosynthesis are severely affected under these conditions (Bednarz and Oosterhuis, 1999; Hafsi et al., 2014). This deficiency also correlates with a decrease in protein synthesis and subsequent decline in growth (Walker et al., 1996; Walker et al., 1998). K+ deficiency has been shown to inhibit lateral root development in Arabidopsis (Armengaud et al., 2004; Shin and Schachtman, 2004; Kellermeier et al., 2014) and in barley (Drew, 1975) and in the up-regulation of genes involved in K+ uptake (Ashley et al., 2006; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2014). In addition, K+-deficient plants are more
84

sensitive to abiotic and biotic stresses such as drought, cold, salinity or fungal attacks
(Marschner, 2012; Zörb et al., 2014).

85

86

Sodium (Na⁺) is not an essential element for plants but, for some species it can be a beneficial element that stimulates growth (Wakeel et al., 2010; Wakeel et al., 2011; Kronzucker et al., 2013). In these cases, Na⁺ can be regarded as a functional nutrient (Subbarao et al., 2003), that can partly replace K⁺ in some functions such as osmotic adjustment of the large central vacuole, cell turgor regulation leading to cell enlargement, or long-distance transport of anions (Subbarao et al., 2003; Horie et al., 2007; Gattward et al., 2012; Battie-Laclau et al., 2013).

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

On the other hand, Na+ has been extensively associated to its negative impact on crop yield. Excess of Na⁺ salts in the soil results in both reduced soil water availability (due to the decrease in water potential) and ionic toxicity. When accumulated at high concentrations in the cytoplasm, Na⁺ results in deleterious effects on cell biology, e.g., on photosynthetic activity or on membrane integrity (due to displacement of membrane-bound Ca²⁺ ions (Cramer et al., 1985). Thus, Na⁺ is usually compartmentalized outside the cytoplasm (Morgan et al., 2014), in vesicles such as the vacuole, where it is used as an osmoticum. Estimates of the area of salt-affected soils vary widely, ranging from 6% to 10% of the earth's land area (Eynard et al., 2005; Munns and Tester, 2008). Importantly, 20% of irrigated lands are affected by secondary salinization, limiting agriculture worldwide.

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

In the present review, we summarize recent advances in the field of K⁺ and Na⁺ uptake in the plant root, with special attention to the transport systems and their regulation mechanisms. We believe that the studies performed on the model plant Arabidopsis and the results of recent research in crops such as rice suggest that the results obtained with model species cannot be fully extended to other plant species.

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

### K⁺ and Na⁺ uptake by roots: kinetic features and sensitivity to other cations

111

K⁺ and Na⁺ can enter the root apoplast and diffuse towards inner cell layers (Sattelmacher et al., 1998). However, this pathway is interrupted by the endodermis, where the Casparian strip, which is impermeable to water and ions, is located (Schreiber et al., 1999; Tester and Leigh, 2001; Marschner, 2012; Geldner, 2013; Barberon and Geldner, 2014). To cross this impermeable barrier, nutrient ions enter the cytosol of a root peripheral cell either from the epidermis, cortex or endodermis and move from cell to cell (symplastic pathway) through plasmodesmata (Burch-Smith and Zambryski,

112

113

114

115

116

117
118

2012). Diffusion within the symplasm beyond the endodermic barrier allows nutrient ions to reach the stele, where they will initiate their travel towards the aerial parts within the xylem vessels (Lauchli, 1972).

119

120

121

It is worth noting that the Casparian strip may be absent in some places (Maathuis, 2014) allowing ions to reach the root stele and xylem vessels through the apoplastic pathway via bypass flow (Kronzucker and Britto, 2011). Since this flow is relatively low, most of the ions that reach the root xylem vessels are probably taken up across the plasma membrane of a root peripheral cell (Tester and Leigh, 2001). Thus, their entry into the root symplasm would have been mediated by membrane transport systems, channels, transporters or cotransporters. It should be noted that the bypass flow was observed in rice at Na⁺ external concentrations as low as 25mM (YEO et al., 1987) and it may contribute to salt stressing effects under high salinity by having an effect in shoot Na⁺ content (YEO et al., 1987; Faiyue et al., 2012; Maathuis, 2014). Na⁺ bypass flow has been described in other species, besides rice, such as mangroves (Krishnamurthy et al., 2014), maize and broad bean (Peterson et al., 1981), but not in Arabidopsis (Essah et al., 2003).

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

More than 60 years ago, through the application of the concept of enzyme kinetics for the study of root K⁺ absorption (Epstein and Hagen, 1952), Epstein and coworkers suggested that at least two transport systems were involved in root K⁺ uptake: a high-affinity system that operates at low external concentrations and a low-affinity system at higher concentrations (Epstein et al., 1963). A similar scheme was also described for Na⁺ uptake (Rains and Epstein, 1967a). This biphasic behavior has since been observed in many plant species, with some exceptions. Maize for example, shows a linear, non-saturating response to K⁺ in the low-affinity range (Kochian and Lucas, 1982). More recently, it has been shown that this linear response is dominated by the apoplastic movement of K⁺, and the “true” transmembrane flux saturates at modest rates (Coskun et al., 2016). In the high-affinity range of concentrations, K⁺ uptake is an active process that takes place against the K⁺ electrochemical potential, most likely by a K⁺/H⁺ symport, whilst the low-affinity uptake can take place by passive transport through inwardly-rectifying K⁺ channels (Maathuis and Sanders, 1996a; Maathuis et al., 1997; Rodríguez-Navarro, 2000). It should also be noted that the limits in K⁺ concentrations for the operation of a symporter or a channel depend on the plasma membrane potential and the cytoplasmic pH and K⁺ concentrations. Thus, assuming for example that a cytoplasmic K⁺ concentration of 100 mM and a membrane potential of -240 mV exists,

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151
K⁺ uptake could take place through a channel from an external K⁺ concentration as low as 10 µM, which falls within the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (Epstein et al., 1963; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999). High-affinity K⁺ uptake becomes apparent when K⁺ tissue concentrations decrease due to K⁺ starvation (Glass, 1976; Kochian and Lucas, 1982; Siddiqi and Glass, 1986; Martínez-Cordero et al., 2005). Providing NH₄⁺ to the nutrient solution used to grow the plants, has a large influence on the NH₄⁺ sensitivity of high-affinity K⁺ uptake. In some species such as barley (Santa-María et al., 2000), pepper (Martínez-Cordero et al., 2005) or Arabidopsis (Rubio et al., 2008), the presence of NH₄⁺ in the growth solution induced an NH₄⁺-insensitive high-affinity K⁺ uptake component. In others, such as tomato (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2007), high-affinity K⁺ uptake was dominated by an NH₄⁺-sensitive component, irrespectively of the presence or the absence of NH₄⁺ in the growth solution. By contrast, both Na⁺ (Martínez-Cordero et al., 2005; Kronzucker et al., 2006; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2007; Kronzucker et al., 2008; Alemán et al., 2009; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010; Cheng et al., 2015) and Cs⁺ (Rubio et al., 2000; White and Broadley, 2000; Qi et al., 2008) usually inhibit high-affinity K⁺ uptake.

Regarding low-affinity K⁺ transport, the role of TEA⁺, Cs⁺ and Ba²⁺, in blocking animal and plant K⁺ channels is well known, as these inhibit low-affinity K⁺ uptake, supporting the idea of the channel-mediated nature of this transport (Ketchum and Poole, 1991; Blatt, 1992; Hille, 1992; Very and Sentenac, 2002; Hoopen et al., 2010; Coskun et al., 2013). Unlike high-affinity K⁺ uptake, low-affinity K⁺ uptake is not down-regulated at high external K⁺ (Maathuis and Sanders, 1996b; Szczerba et al., 2006) and it is NH₄⁺-insensitive (Spalding et al., 1999; Santa-María et al., 2000; Kronzucker et al., 2003; Szczerba et al., 2006). Na⁺ suppresses K⁺ uptake both in the low- and the high-affinity ranges, with low-affinity K⁺ uptake being more sensitive to this inhibition (Epstein et al., 1963; Rains and Epstein, 1967a; Kronzucker et al., 2006; Kronzucker et al., 2008). It is worth noting that K⁺ uptake seems to be insensitive to Ca²⁺ in barley and Arabidopsis (Cramer et al., 1989; Caballero et al., 2012; Coskun et al., 2013).

As for Na⁺ uptake, it has been shown that root high-affinity Na⁺ uptake is significant when plants are starved of K⁺ (Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Haro et al., 2010). Under these conditions, Na⁺ is able to partially replace K⁺ and support plant growth (Maathuis and Sanders, 1993; Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Horie et al., 2007; Wakeel et al., 2011; Wakeel, 2013). High-affinity Na⁺ uptake has been shown to be sensitive to K⁺
and Ca²⁺ in barley (Rains and Epstein, 1967b) and to K⁺ and Ba²⁺ in rice (Garciadeblas et al., 2003). By contrast, low-affinity Na⁺ uptake seems to be insensitive to Ca²⁺ and K⁺ in rice (Malagoli et al., 2008) while it is sensitive to Ca²⁺ in Arabidopsis, barley and wheat (Cramer et al., 1987; Cramer et al., 1989; Essah et al., 2003; D'Onofrio et al., 2005). Na⁺ uptake can be reduced by the application of K⁺, and such reduction can alleviate salt stress effects to some extent (Wakeel, 2013). For example, a reduction in tissue Na⁺ content due to increased K⁺ application was observed in strawberry or in *Jatropha curcas* (Khayyat et al., 2009; Rodrigues et al., 2012).

194

## Identification of K⁺ transport systems in plants

The molecular approaches developed in the last 25 years have led to the characterization of many K⁺ and Na⁺ transport systems in plants. The first K⁺ uptake system identified in plants, AKT1, was isolated by complementing a K⁺-uptake deficient yeast strain with an Arabidopsis cDNA library (Sentenac et al., 1992). Sequence analysis and heterologous expression in Sf9-insect cells showed that the AKT1 cDNA encoded an inward-rectifier K⁺ channel belonging to the Shaker family (Gaymard et al., 1996). The gene encoding this channel showed specific constitutive expression in epidermal root cells (Lagarde et al., 1996) and AKT1 was proposed as the system mediating low-affinity K⁺ uptake in the roots.

Later, a PCR-based approach led to the identification of a cDNA from barley, HvHAK1, that mediated high-affinity K⁺ uptake in yeast (Santa-María et al., 1997). Specific expression of its mRNA in K⁺-starved roots and its kinetic properties in yeast prompted researchers to propose it as the system mediating the high-affinity K⁺ uptake observed in barley roots (Epstein et al., 1963). Subsequent studies led to the identification of an Arabidopsis homolog of HvHAK1, that was named AtHAK5 (Rubio et al., 2000).

In addition to AKT1 and AtHAK5-like transporters, other K⁺ uptake systems could be involved in root K⁺ uptake and in trans-membrane K⁺ movements in other plant organs. Moreover, the sequence of whole genomes of plants evidenced the existence of large gene families encoding putative K⁺ transport systems (Grabov, 2007; Véry et al., 2014; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2016).

217

218

219
220 Initial characterizations in Arabidopsis

221 The studies on heterologous systems and on gene expression patterns for AKT1 and
222 AtHAK5 produced data suggesting that these two systems played important roles in K+
223 acquisition by the root. However, a demonstration for the proposed roles was only
224 possible when Arabidopsis knock-out mutants for these two genes became available
225 (Spalding et al., 1999; Gierth et al., 2005; Rubio et al., 2008; Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et
226 al., 2010). The studies showed that while Arabidopsis WT and *akt1* plants could deplete
227 external K⁺(Rb⁺) to values around 1 µM, the *athak5* plants did not diminish its
228 concentration below 30 µM. In agreement with this, reduced growth was observed in
229 *hak5* plants grown in the presence of 1 µM K⁺ (Qi et al., 2008) or 10 µM K⁺ (Pyo et al.
230 2010; Ragel et al. 2015). Moreover, K⁺(Rb⁺) uptake in *athak5* plants was completely
231 inhibited by the presence of Ba²⁺ in the external solution. By contrast, a complete
232 inhibition of K⁺(Rb⁺) depletion was observed in the presence of NH₄⁺ in the *akt1* line.
233 An *athak5 akt1* double mutant did not show K⁺(Rb⁺) uptake at external concentrations
234 below 50 µM, and it could only promote K⁺(Rb⁺) uptake at concentrations higher than
235 100 µM. All these results demonstrated that in Arabidopsis plants, AtHAK5 was the
236 only system mediating K⁺ uptake at concentrations below 10 µM and that this system
237 was inhibited by NH₄⁺. At concentrations between 10 and 200 µM, both AtHAK5 and
238 AKT1 contributed to K⁺ uptake, defining AKT1 as a Ba²⁺-sensitive component of K⁺
239 uptake. Above 500 µM AtHAK5 contribution was negligible as the *AtHAK5* gene was
240 repressed at this external K⁺ concentration, and AKT1 role became more relevant.
241 Unidentified systems could compensate for the lack of AKT1 since the *akt1* and the
242 *athak5 akt1* lines grew at similar rates than the WT line when the external K⁺
243 concentration was sufficiently high (> 10 mM).

244 The studies described for Arabidopsis allowed for depicting a model for the
245 contribution of AtHAK5 and AKT1 to root K⁺ uptake (Alemán et al., 2011). They also
246 allowed for extending the studies to species where knock-out mutants were not
247 available, through the use of NH₄⁺ and Ba²⁺ as specific inhibitors of HAK5 and AKT1,
248 respectively. Thus, it was shown that in tomato and pepper plants grown in the absence
249 of NH₄⁺, an NH₄⁺-sensitive component, probably mediated by SIHAK5 (formerly
250 LeHAK5) and CaHAK1 respectively, dominated K⁺ uptake from concentrations
251 corresponding to the high-affinity component (inhibition of K⁺ uptake by NH₄⁺ was
252 close to 80% in tomato, for example) (Martínez-Cordero et al., 2005; Nieves-Cordones
253 et al., 2007). These results contrast with those obtained for Arabidopsis, where both
AtHAK5 and AKT1 contribute to K⁺ uptake within the range of the K⁺ concentration assigned to the high-affinity component, as demonstrated by the use of single (Rubio et al., 2008), and double KO mutants (Rubio et al., 2010) in AtHAK5 and AKT1. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Arabidopsis model cannot be completely extended to other plant species, crops included, and highlights the need for the characterization of knock-out lines in each particular species to address the relevance of the different K⁺ transport systems. In addition, the availability of whole genomes for many plant species revealed some differences with respect to Arabidopsis. In Arabidopsis, AtHAK5 is the only member that belongs to the cluster Ia of HAK transporters, which are involved in high-affinity K⁺ uptake in roots (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2016). In tomato, a highly homologous gene to *SlHAK5* is located just 2580 pb downstream from it in the tomato genome (Fernandez-Pozo et al., 2015). In rice, the *OsHAK21* gene, also belonging to cluster Ia is induced by salinity, something that has not been described in other species for members of this cluster. This transporter has been linked to rice tolerance to salinity through the maintenance of Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis, although the physiological mechanism remains unclear (Shen et al., 2015).

270

271 Rice transport systems contributing to root K⁺ uptake

272 The recent characterization of T-DNA insertion rice lines knocked-out for K⁺ uptake 273 systems such as OsHAK1, OsHAK5 and OsAKT1, has importantly contributed to 274 increase our understanding of the relative contribution of such systems to K⁺ uptake in a 275 species different from Arabidopsis, which is of great importance in agriculture.

276 A T-DNA insertion mutant with OsAKT1 knocked-out (Golldack et al., 2003) 277 showed reduced growth and decreased root and shoot K⁺ concentrations when grown in 278 the presence of 1 and 0.1 mM K⁺ (Li et al., 2014). K⁺ flux experiments and 279 electrophysiological approaches showed an impairment of K⁺ uptake in the *osakt1* line. 280 Strong expression of *OsAKT1* was detected in epidermal root cells, but it was also found 281 in cortex, endodermis and vascular bundles, suggesting a direct or indirect role in K⁺ 282 translocation. In addition, slight expression was detected in shoots.

283 Knock-out mutants of the gene encoding the high-affinity K⁺ transporter 284 OsHAK1 (Bañuelos et al., 2002) were also characterized. The studies with *oshak1* lines 285 showed that OsHAK1 contributed about 50-55 % of high-affinity K⁺ uptake in the range 286 of 0.05-0.1 mM external K⁺ and about 30% of K⁺ uptake at 1 mM external K⁺ (Chen et 287 al., 2015). Root and shoot growth, cell size and internal K⁺ concentrations were reduced
288 in the *oshak1* mutant at both 0.1 and 1 mM K⁺ and this deficient phenotype could not be
289 rescued at high external K⁺ (5 mM K⁺). Transcripts of *OsHAK1* are preferentially
290 accumulated in roots of K⁺-starved plants, as it is observed with *AtHAK5* in
291 Arabidopsis. In addition, *OsHAK1* is strongly expressed at the xylem parenchyma and
292 phloem of root vascular tissues, shoot meristems and vascular bundles of leaf sheaths.
293 Moreover, *oshak1* plants show reduced K⁺ translocation from root to shoot. In addition,
294 the *osakt1* and *oshak1* lines were inhibited throughout development, showing delayed
295 grain filling and reduced grain yield, suggesting that they may play an important role in
296 rice productivity.

297 OsHAK5 was isolated and characterized as a high-affinity transport system in
298 heterologous systems (Horie et al., 2011). Expression studies showed that OsHAK5
299 localized to the plasma membrane and that under normal K⁺ supply its transcripts were
300 detected in root, root-shoot junction and leaf sheath. K⁺ starvation enhanced its
301 expression in root epidermis, parenchyma of stele tissue, primordials of lateral roots,
302 mesophyll and parenchyma cells of the vascular bundle. The expression pattern of
303 *OsHAK5* supported its role in K⁺ uptake, but also in K⁺ distribution between roots and
304 shoots, especially at low external K⁺. The lower accumulation of K⁺ in roots of
305 overexpressing lines and the higher K⁺ accumulation in the knock-out lines, grown in
306 low K⁺, supported this idea (Yang et al., 2014). These authors suggested that OsHAK5
307 may mediate K⁺ accumulation in xylem parenchyma cells to enable K⁺ channels to
308 release K⁺ efficiently into the xylem sap. A role for OsHAK5 in K⁺ signaling is also
309 proposed, as K⁺ in the phloem may act as a signal to convey the shoot demand of K⁺
310 and K⁺ xylem loading (Engels and Marschner, 1992), and *OsHAK5* is abundantly
311 expressed in phloem tissue. A role for the AKT2 channel in K⁺ signaling by modulating
312 K⁺ in the phloem has been also proposed (Deeken et al., 2002) and AKT2 has been
313 recently suggested as a pathway for Na⁺ entry into the roots (Salvador-Recatala, 2016).
314 Since AKT2-mediated K⁺ transport is Ca²⁺-sensitive (Latz et al., 2007), interesting
315 interactions between salt stress, Ca²⁺ and AKT2 may emerge.

316 The differential abundance of *OsHAK1*, *OsHAK5* and *OsAKT1* transcripts
317 suggests that they play non-redundant functions. *OsHAK1* and *OsAKT1* are highly
318 expressed in all cell types of roots and at low levels in shoots. However, while the
319 *OsHAK1* gene was induced 8- to 12-fold by K⁺ starvation (Chen et al., 2015), *OsAKT1*
320 expression was not affected by the external K⁺ concentrations (Li et al., 2014). By
321 contrast, *OsHAK5* was less expressed in roots and strongly in shoots (Yang et al., 2014).
It has been proposed that both OsHAK1 and OsAKT1 contribute to K⁺ acquisition at low and high external concentrations. At low K⁺, OsHAK1 dominates high-affinity K⁺ uptake over OsAKT1 and OsHAK5. By contrast, OsHAK5 dominates K⁺ transport from root to shoots (Yang et al., 2014).

The studies described above suggest that OsHAK1, OsHAK5 and OsAKT1 are involved in K⁺ uptake at low and high concentrations as well as in K⁺ translocation from root to shoot. Contribution to K⁺ uptake over a wide range of K⁺ concentrations by a unique system has been demonstrated for the Arabidopsis AKT1 (Alemán et al., 2011). For transporters of the HAK family, the overexpression of AtKUP1 in Arabidopsis suspension cells produced enhanced K⁺ uptake at micromolar and millimolar K⁺ concentrations (Kim et al., 1998). The rice studies reviewed here suggest that OsHAK1 and OsHAK5 may contribute to K⁺ uptake at both low and high concentrations, which would explain why the growth of *oshak1* and *oshak5* lines is not rescued at high external K⁺. However, the idea of dual affinity for HAK transporters should be taken with caution. It is possible that, in addition to K⁺ uptake, the knock-out lines are affected in other processes. In fact, Yang et al. (Yang et al., 2014) highlight the role of some HAK/KUP/KT transporters in auxin distribution, irrespective of K⁺ supply. At this stage, it cannot be ruled out that OsHAK1 and OsHAK5 play a part in this process.

Role of HAK transporters in K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis under NaCl stress

K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis has been shown to be crucial for tolerance of plants to salinity (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999). Maintaining K⁺ uptake rates at high external Na⁺ is crucial for K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis and salt tolerance (Munns and Tester, 2008; Cuin et al., 2012; Cheng et al., 2015). However, in the presence of high Na⁺ concentrations, the low-K⁺ induction of genes encoding high-affinity K⁺ transporters is not observed (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2008; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). In addition, under salinity, K⁺ transport through high-affinity HAK transporters is competitively inhibited (Santa-María et al., 1997; Rubio et al., 2000). In fact, OsHAK1 has been defined as the Na⁺-sensitive high-affinity K⁺ pathway in rice (Chen et al., 2015). Nonetheless, studies in low-K⁺-grown Arabidopsis and rice plants showed that AtHAK5 and OsHAK1 function was still pivotal in maintaining K⁺ uptake and plant growth in the presence of high Na⁺ (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2015). In addition to OsHAK1, OsHAK5 may also play a role in salt tolerance, as high salt transiently enhances
356 *OsHAK5* expression (Yang et al., 2014) and the transporter mediates Na⁺-insensitive K⁺ uptake (Horie et al., 2011). In the presence of salinity, OsHAK5-overexpressing lines 357 accumulated more K⁺ in shoots and showed enhanced growth as compared to WT. In 358 contrast, *oshak5* lines accumulated more Na⁺ in shoots and grew less than WT plants 359 (Yang et al., 2014). The authors propose that the higher accumulation of Na⁺ in shoots 360 in *oshak5* may be due to a hyperpolarized membrane potential of mesophyll cells in 361 knock-out mutants that would favor Na⁺ accumulation in shoots. Therefore, the K⁺ 362 transport systems that contribute to maintaining a depolarized membrane potential of 363 mesophyll cells to evade excessive Na⁺ accumulation under salinity may play a role in 364 salt tolerance. The function of another rice HAK transporter, OsHAK21, seems to be 365 important for salt tolerance (Shen et al., 2015). The gene encoding this transporter is 366 enhanced by salinity and the protein is localized to the plasma membrane of xylem 367 parenchyma and endodermal cells (putative passage cells). It has been shown that the 368 knock-out *oshak21* line is more salt sensitive because of a higher and a lower 369 accumulation of Na⁺ and K⁺ respectively, which points to OsHAK21 as a key 370 transporter needed for the maintenance of Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis in rice under salt stress. 371

372

373 *Other systems that may be involved in root K⁺ uptake.*

374 Recently, a T-DNA insertion mutant in the Arabidopsis KUP7, which belongs to cluster 375 V of the HAK family (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2016) has been characterized (Han et al., 376 2016). The results showed that the *kup7* line was sensitive to low K⁺ (< 100 µM), 377 showing lower internal K⁺ concentrations. It could be rescued by higher K⁺ 378 concentrations or by complementing the mutant with the WT gene. The *KUP7* gene was 379 ubiquitously expressed in many organs and the KUP7 protein was localized to the 380 plasma membrane. KUP7 could complement a yeast strain deficient in K⁺ uptake. K⁺ 381 transport studies showed that KUP7 was involved in root K⁺ uptake and K⁺ 382 translocation to the shoot. It seemed to operate at higher concentrations than AtHAK5, 383 and may be an alternative system involved in K⁺ uptake in the *athak5 akt1* Arabidopsis 384 line (Caballero et al., 2012). The observed effect on K⁺ translocation may be an indirect 385 effect of a reduced uptake. However, Han et al., (Han et al., 2016) speculated that KUP7 386 may mediate K⁺ release into the xylem sap. It should be noted that besides K⁺ uptake, 387 some HAK transporters have been shown to mediate K⁺ efflux (Bañuelos et al., 2002; 388 Garciadeblas et al., 2002; Osakabe et al., 2013). Thus, K⁺ release into the xylem sap 389 could take place through this type of transporters, if the electrochemical potential for K⁺
allows for this movement. It is well known that K⁺ loading of the xylem is mainly mediated by SKOR channels and the possible specific contribution of HAK transporters to K⁺ loading is yet to be determined.

All of the above described results can be summarized into two different models for the K⁺ uptake systems in Arabidopsis and rice roots, shown in Figure 1.

## Regulation of K⁺ uptake

In general terms, the genes encoding HAK transporters that mediate high-affinity K⁺ uptake in roots are strongly induced by K⁺ deprivation, whereas the genes encoding AKT1 channels are not. Several elements in the signal transduction cascade that results in the activation of HAK transcription have been identified. One of the first events when a root faces K⁺ deprivation is the hyperpolarization of the cell's plasma membrane (Amtmann and Blatt, 2009). A positive correlation has been found between the membrane potential and the expression levels of *SlHAK5* and *AtHAK5*, independent of the root's K⁺ concentration (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2008; Rubio et al., 2014). Thus, it has been proposed that the hyperpolarization of the membrane potential may be the first element in the low-K⁺ signal cascade. The mechanisms linking membrane potential and gene expression are unknown but, changes in cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ derived from the activity of hyperpolarization-activated Ca²⁺ channels, could provide a connecting mechanism (Véry and Davies, 2000). Increases in ethylene (Jung et al., 2009) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Shin and Schachtman, 2004; Hernandez et al., 2012) are also involved, probably acting following the hyperpolarization of the membrane potential. Other hormones such as jasmonic acid (Armengaud et al., 2004; 2010; Takehisa et al., 2013; Schachtman, 2015) and cytokinins (Nam et al., 2012) may also play a role in K⁺ signaling. At the end of the cascade, transcription factors such as DDF2, JLO, bHLH121, TFII_A for Arabidopsis *AtHAK5* (Kim et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2013), bind the gene's promoter to activate its expression.

Interestingly, some environmental conditions such as the lack of N, P or S, that hyperpolarize root cell membrane potential (Rubio et al., 2014) and elevate ROS levels (Shin et al., 2005), also activate the transcription of *AtHAK5*-type genes. However, under such conditions, no HAK-mediated uptake is observed, suggesting a post-transcriptional regulation for these HAK transporters that is elicited specifically by K⁺ starvation (Rubio et al., 2014). Recently, it has been shown that the Arabidopsis
AtHAK5 transporter is activated by complexes that contain the CIPK23 kinase and CBL1, CBL8, CBL9 or CBL10 Ca²⁺ sensors. AtHAK5 phosphorylation by CIPK23 leads to increases in the maximal rate of transport (Vmax) and the affinity for K⁺ transport (Ragel et al., 2015). It can be assumed that a specific low-K⁺-induced Ca²⁺ signal is registered by the CBL Ca²⁺ sensor, that in turn promotes phosphorylation of the transporter by CIPK23.

As a voltage-dependent inward-rectifier K⁺ channel, AKT1 activity is regulated by the membrane potential (Gaymard et al., 1996; Xu et al., 2006). In addition, its activity is modulated by interaction with other proteins. AKT1 forms tetrameric channels by interacting with the AtKC1 subunit (Daram et al., 1997; Pilot et al., 2003; Duby et al., 2008; Geiger et al., 2009). Upon interaction with AtKC1 in root cells, the activation potential for AKT1-containing channels becomes more negative, in comparison with AKT1 homotetramers (Reintanz et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2010). Moreover, AtKC1 interacts, in turn, with the SNARE proteins SYP121 (Honsbein et al., 2009) and VAMP721 (Zhang et al., 2015). SYP121 was shown to activate K⁺ uptake through AKT1/AtKC1 channels while VAMP721 negatively regulated this process. Phosphorylation also plays a role in AKT1 regulation. AKT1 activity is enhanced at low K⁺ by the same regulators as AtHAK5, i.e., the CIPK23/CBL1/9 complex, supporting the putative role of Ca²⁺ as a secondary messenger involved in low-K⁺ signaling (Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2006). Inactivation of the channel is achieved by the AIP1 phosphatase (Luan, 2009). It is worth to note that CBL proteins can also modify AKT1 activity in absence of CIPKs, as it is the case of CBL10 which is a negative regulator of AKT1 (Ren et al., 2013). Recently it has been shown that CIPK23 and AtKC1 act synergistically and balance K⁺ uptake/leakage to modulate AKT1-mediated responses of Arabidopsis to low K⁺ (Wang et al., 2016). Finally, nitric oxide has recently been shown to lower AKT1 activity by modulating vitamin B6 biosynthesis, constituting a new mechanism for the regulation of K⁺ uptake (Xia et al., 2014).

The current model for the regulation of these two main systems involved in K⁺ uptake, i.e. AtHAK5 and AKT1, is depicted in Figure 2.

It is worth mentioning that CIPK23/CBL is also involved in the regulation of NO₃⁻ uptake (Ho et al., 2009; Tsay et al., 2011; Léran et al., 2015), and that K⁺ starvation significantly reduced the NO₃⁻ concentrations in tomato plants (Rubio et al., 2014) and induced several genes for NO₃⁻ uptake (Armengaud et al., 2004). This
indicates that a cross-regulation between K⁺ and NO₃⁻ nutrition exists and that the CIPK23/CBL complex may constitute one of the key elements for such regulation.

459

## Uptake of Na⁺ and cell mechanisms involved

As for the identities of genes involved in Na⁺ uptake from external solutions, the scenario is far less clear than that for K⁺. With respect to high-affinity Na⁺ uptake, despite this activity being widely observed in roots from several species (Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Haro et al., 2010), only a few transport systems belonging to the HKT and HAK transporter families have been shown to take up Na⁺ within this range of concentrations. High-affinity K⁺ transporters (HKT) are related to fungal and bacterial K⁺ transporters from the Trk/Ktr families (Corratgé-Faillie et al., 2010). In plants however, HKT transporters display varying Na⁺/K⁺ permeabilities. Phylogenetic and functional analyses have led to the identification of two HKT subfamilies (Platten et al., 2006): subfamily I, present in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species, and subfamily II, identified only in monocotyledonous species so far. Subfamily II HKT transporters are expected to be all K⁺-permeable and can operate as Na⁺-K⁺ symporters (Rubio et al., 1995; Jabnoune et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2010; Oomen et al., 2012) or K⁺-selective uniporters (Horie et al., 2011; Sassi et al., 2012) when heterologously expressed in yeast and/or Xenopus oocytes. Subfamily I HKT transporters are Na⁺-selective in Arabidopsis and rice and are mostly involved in Na⁺ recirculation through vascular tissues (Maathuis, 2014; Véry et al., 2014), thus falling beyond the scope of the present review. In the rice cultivar Nipponbare, OsHKT2;1 provides a major pathway for root high-affinity Na⁺ uptake that supports plant growth under limiting K⁺ supply (Garciadeblas et al., 2003; Horie et al., 2007) (Figure 1). Plants lacking a functional OsHKT2;1 gene have shown reduced growth and lower Na⁺ content when starved of K⁺ in the presence of 0.5mM Na⁺, and under such conditions Na⁺ can partially compensate K⁺ demand (Horie et al., 2007). Besides Na⁺, OsHKT2;1 can also transport K⁺ when expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Jabnoune et al., 2009; Oomen et al., 2012), but K⁺ transport is not detected when it was expressed in yeast or in tobacco BY2 cells (Horie et al., 2001; Yao et al., 2010). In OsHKT2;1 expressing oocytes, the shifts in reversal potentials induced by K⁺ depended on the pre-treatment of oocytes. When the oocytes were pre-treated in low-Na⁺ (0.5 mM Na⁺) they showed smaller shifts that when pretreated with high-Na⁺ (96 mM Na⁺) (Yao et al., 2010). Comparisons of Rb⁺ influx between wild-type and *oshkt2;1* roots did not reveal significant differences between
these genotypes (Horie et al., 2007). Thus, the possible involvement of OsHKT2;1 in root K⁺ uptake remains to be verified. Another subfamily II HKT transporter, OsHKT2;2, is absent in the Nipponbare (japonica) cultivar but present in the indica cultivar Pokkali. The transporter obtained from the latter cultivar is permeable to both Na⁺ and K⁺ at low external concentrations when expressed in tobacco BY2 cells, yeast and Xenopus oocytes (Horie et al., 2001; Yao et al., 2010; Oomen et al., 2012). It is important to note that a natural chimera OsHKT2;2/1 present in the Nona Bokra (indica) cultivar maintains high-affinity K⁺ uptake even at high Na⁺ concentrations, something that is also observed for Pokkali OsHKT2;2 but not for Nipponbare OsHKT2;1 (Oomen et al., 2012). Despite the lack of data concerning *oshkt2;2* knock-out mutants, it is tempting to speculate that OsHKT2;2 contributes to both K⁺ and Na⁺ high-affinity uptake in rice roots. As for HAK transporters, two members, none of them from higher plants, have been shown to mediate high-affinity Na⁺ uptake: PpHAK13 from the moss *Physcomitrella patens* and Y1HAK1 from the yeast *Yarrowia lipolytica* (Benito et al., 2012). PpHAK13, which belongs to cluster IV (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2016), transports Na⁺, but not K⁺, and high-affinity Na⁺ uptake is abolished in *pphak13* mutants plants which evidences that PpHAK13 forms the major pathway for Na⁺ entry at low external concentrations in *P. patens* plants. On the other hand, Y1HAK1 is able to transport Na⁺ and K⁺ when expressed in yeast, but the latter cation is only transported when Na⁺ is not added to the experimental solution. High-affinity Na⁺ transporters from the HAK family in higher plants are still to be identified.

Concerning low-affinity Na⁺ uptake, it is generally accepted that Na⁺ can enter the plant through ion channels (Maathuis, 2014). Na⁺-permeable channels include glutamate-like receptors (GLRs; (Davenport, 2002)) and cyclic nucleotide gated channels (CNGCs; (Assmann, 1995; Bolwell, 1995; Trewavas, 1997; Newton and Smith, 2004)) and possibly other, non-identified, non-selective cation channels (NSCCs; (Maathuis and Sanders, 1993; Tyerman et al., 1997; Demidchik and Tester, 2002; Essah et al., 2003). Voltage-independent, Non-Selective Cation Channels (VI-NSCC) may constitute the main class of NSCCs involved in Na⁺ entry since they are highly sensitive to Ca²⁺ as observed for Na⁺ uptake in roots (Demidchik and Maathuis, 2007). Moreover, VI-NSCC blockers such as quinine or lanthanides also inhibited root Na⁺ influx (Essah et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2006). Despite these encouraging observations linking VI-NSCCs and root Na⁺ uptake, the molecular identity of these channels remains obscure at present. Several HAK and HKT transporters, which are
expressed in roots, are also permeable at millimolar Na⁺ concentrations (Santa-María et al., 1997; Horie et al., 2001; Takahashi et al., 2007; Mian et al., 2011; Oomen et al., 2012). It is worth to note that OsHKT2;1 and HvHKT2;1 contribute to Na⁺ uptake in the millimolar range but they are downregulated in the presence of salt stress or K⁺. Thus, when taking into account other experimental conditions and plant species, it remains unclear which other type/family of transport systems constitute the major pathway for low-affinity Na⁺ uptake. It is likely that there is a large redundancy between the aforementioned channels and transporters. Insights into the identification of the contributing transport proteins would be of extraordinary biotechnological value since low-affinity Na⁺ uptake allows for the massive entry of Na⁺ within the plant that gives rise to toxicity. Interestingly, the secondary messengers cyclic AMP and GMP affect Na⁺ influx. Studies on Arabidopsis seedlings (Maathuis and Sanders, 2001; Essah et al., 2003) and on pepper plants (Rubio et al., 2003) have shown that unidirectional Na⁺ influx is reduced by cGMP addition. CNGCs have a cyclic-nucleotide binding domain and their activity is modulated by cyclic-nucleotides (Gao et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2016). It can be expected that the cyclic-nucleotide regulation of Na⁺ fluxes occurs through direct cGMP (or cAMP) binding to this domain as it is the case of animal CNGCs (Craven and Zagotta, 2006).

Recently, it has been shown that salt stress triggers the formation of endocytic vesicles via a clathrin-independent mechanism (Baral et al., 2015). Such vesicles lead to the formation of vacuole-like structures that may help plants to better cope with salt stress. Endocytosis can modify the transporter complement of the plasma membrane (Sutter et al., 2007), thus affecting the Na⁺ uptake pathways. But more interestingly, the endocytic process involves bulk-flow entry into root cells that may transport Na⁺ ions from the apoplast to the vacuole-like structures. If this were true, it would constitute a parallel pathway for Na⁺ uptake, independent from that mediated by transmembrane proteins. Moreover, this direct Na⁺ transport into vacuoles would prevent Na⁺ accumulation in the cytosol which leads to cell toxicity. Interestingly, vesicle trafficking has been recently suggested to play a role in plant adaptation to salt stress (Garcia de la Garma et al., 2014).

## Concluding remarks

K⁺ is an essential macronutrient for plants while Na⁺ may be beneficial or detrimental at low or high concentrations, respectively. Plant roots possess specific K⁺ transport
systems that can function under a wide range of concentrations to secure K⁺ ions. The studies with knock-out mutants of the model plant Arabidopsis have led to the identification of two major pathways for K⁺ uptake: the high-affinity K⁺ transporter AtHAK5 and the inward-rectifying K⁺ channel AKT1. These systems operate at low (micromolar) and high (millimolar) external K⁺ concentrations, although an overlap in their operation is observed in the 10-200 µM K⁺ range. Different mechanisms that include transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation modulate the activity of these two systems in response to K⁺ supply. Importantly, the CIPK23/CBL1 complex activates AtHAK5 as well as AKT1, pointing to its role as a central regulator of K⁺ nutrition. Homologs of AtHAK5 and AKT1 have been found in many plant species, and in some of them, paralogue genes exist which suggest function redundancy. This precludes assigning a function by only using sequence homology or heterologous expression studies. The recent characterization of rice knock-out plants has shed light on this matter. OsHAK1, OsHAK5 and OsAKT1 seem to contribute to root K⁺ uptake as well as K⁺ release into xylem, and they probably play additional unknown functions in the shoot. However, they play non-redundant roles: (i) OsHAK1 is mainly involved in root K⁺ uptake at low concentrations, (ii) OsAKT1 mostly at high K⁺ concentrations and (iii) OsHAK5 is more relevant for K⁺ translocation to the shoot. These systems may also play a role in salinity tolerance by maintaining the K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis.

Regarding Na⁺ transport systems, the information is scarcer. High-affinity Na⁺ uptake and high-affinity Na⁺ transporters have been described in some species, but they are lacking in many others. The pathways for low-affinity Na⁺ uptake are not clearly identified yet, and several families of transporters contain members that could be good candidates. Recently, it has been described that salt stress induced a new endocytic pathway that is clathrin-independent, non-discriminatory in its choice of cargo, and that operates across all layers of the root. This new pathway may contribute to the bulk Na⁺ uptake and distribution across the root cells under saline stress conditions.

All of the above highlight the importance of characterizing the function of each transporter in each particular species. The studies with knock-out lines in Arabidopsis and rice evidence that the conclusions drawn in model species cannot be always fully extended to other, non-model species.

590
591
592
593 Funding

594 This work was funded by Grant number AGL2015-66434-R from the Ministerio de

595 Economía y Competitividad, Spain.

596

597

Provisional
598 References

599 Alemán, F., Nieves-Cordones, M., Martínez, V., and Rubio, F. (2009). Differential regulation of the HAK5 genes encoding the high-affinity K⁺ transporters of Thellungiella halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana. *Environ. Exp. Bot.* 65, 263-269.

600 Alemán, F., Nieves-Cordones, M., Martínez, V., and Rubio, F. (2011). Root k⁺ acquisition in plants: the *Arabidopsis thaliana* model. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 52, 1603-1612. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr096.

605 Amtmann, A., and Blatt, M.R. (2009). Regulation of macronutrient transport. *New Phytol.* 181, 35-52.

608 Armengaud, P., Breitling, R., and Amtmann, A. (2004). The potassium-dependent transcriptome of arabidopsis reveals a prominent role of jasmonic acid in nutrient signaling. *Plant Physiol.* 136, 2556-2576.

611 Armengaud, P., Breitling, R., and Amtmann, A. (2010). Coronatine-insensitive 1 (COI1) mediates transcriptional responses of *Arabidopsis thaliana* to external potassium supply. *Mol. Plant* 3, 390-405. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq012.

614 Ashley, M.K., Grant, M., and Grabov, A. (2006). Plant responses to potassium deficiencies: a role for potassium transport proteins. *J. Exp. Bot.* 57, 425-436.

616 Assmann, S.M. (1995). Cyclic AMP as a second messenger in higher plants (status and future prospects). *Plant Physiol.* 108, 885-889.

618 Baldwin, J.P., Nye, P.H., and Tinker, P.B. (1973). Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil. 3. Model for calculating solute uptake by a randomly dispersed root system developing in a finite volume of soil. *Plant Soil* 38, 621-635.

622 Bañuelos, M.A., Garciadeblas, B., Cubero, B., and Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2002). Inventory and functional characterization of the HAK potassium transporters of rice. *Plant Physiol* 130, 784-795.

625 Baral, A., Irani, N.G., Fujimoto, M., Nakano, A., Mayor, S., and Mathew, M.K. (2015). Salt-induced remodeling of spatially restricted clathrin-independent endocytic pathways in Arabidopsis root. *Plant Cell* 27, 1297-1315.

628 Barberon, M., and Geldner, N. (2014). Radial transport of nutrients: the plant root as a polarized epithelium. *Plant Physiol.* 166, 528-537.

630 Barraclough, P.B. (1989). Root-growth, macro-nutrient uptake dynamics and soil fertility requirements of a high-yielding winter oilseed rape crop. *Plant Soil* 119, 59-70.

633 Battie-Laclau, P., Laclau, J.-P., Piccolo, M.D.C., Arenque, B.C., Beri, C., Mietton, L., Almeida Muniz, M.R., Jordan-Meille, L., Buckeridge, M.S., Nouvellon, Y., Ranger, J., and Bouillet, J.-P. (2013). Influence of potassium and sodium nutrition on leaf area components in Eucalyptus grandis trees. *Plant Soil* 371, 19-35.

638 Bednarz, C.W., and Oosterhuis, D.M. (1999). Physiological changes associated with potassium deficiency in cotton. *J.Plant Nutri.* 22, 303-313.

640 Benito, B., Garciadeblas, B., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2012). HAK transporters from Physcomitrella patens and Yarrowia lipolytica mediate sodium uptake. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 53, 1117-1123. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs056.

643 Blatt, M.R. (1992). K⁺ channels of stomatal guard cells. Characteristics of the inward rectifier and its control by pH. *J. Gen. Physiol.* 99, 615-644.

645 Bolwell, G.P. (1995). Cyclic AMP, the reluctant messenger in plants. *Trends Biochem. Sci.* 20, 492-495.
647 Burch-Smith, T.M., and Zambryski, P.C. (2012). Plasmodesmata paradigm shift: 648 regulation from without versus within. *Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.* 63, 239-260.

649 Caballero, F., Botella, M.A., Rubio, L., Fernández, J.A., Martínez, V., and Rubio, F. 650 (2012). A Ca²⁺-sensitive system mediates low-affinity K⁺ uptake in the absence 651 of AKT1 in Arabidopsis plants. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 53, 2047-2059. doi: 652 653 10.1093/pcp/pcs140.

654 Claassen, N., and Jungk, A. (1982). Potassium dynamics at the soil-root interface in 655 relation to the uptake of potassium by maize plants. *Zeitschrift Fur 656 Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkunde* 145, 513-525.

657 Corratgé-Faillie, C., Jabnoune, M., Zimmermann, S., Véry, A.A., Fizames, C., and 658 Sentenac, H. (2010). Potassium and sodium transport in non-animal cells: the 659 Trk/Ktr/HKT transporter family. *Cell. Mol. Life Sci.* 67, 2511-2532.

660 Coskun, D., Britto, D.T., Kochian, L.V., and Kronzucker, H.J. (2016). How high do ion 661 fluxes go? A re-evaluation of the two-mechanism model of K(+) transport in 662 plant roots. *Plant Sci.* 243, 96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.12.003.

663 Coskun, D., Britto, D.T., Li, M., Oh, S., and Kronzucker, H.J. (2013). Capacity and 664 plasticity of potassium channels and high-affinity transporters in roots of barley 665 and Arabidopsis. *Plant Physiol.* 162, 496-511. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.215913.

666 Cramer, G., Epstein, E., and Lauchli, A. (1989). Na-Ca interactions in barley seedlings - 667 relationship to ion-transport and growth. *Plant Cell Environ.* 12, 551-558. doi: 668 667 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb02128.x.

668 Cramer, G.R., Lauchli, A., and Polito, V.S. (1985). Displacement of Ca²⁺ by Na⁺ from 669 the plasmalemma of root-cells - A primary response to salt stress. *Plant Physiol.* 670 79, 207-211. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.1.207.

671 Cramer, G.R., Lynch, J., Lauchli, A., and Epstein, E. (1987). Influx of Na⁺, K⁺ and 672 Ca²⁺ into roots of alt-stressed cotton seedlings. *Plant Physiol.* 79, 207-211.

673 Craven, K.B., and Zagotta, W.N. (2006). CNG and HCN channels: two peas, one pod. 674 *Annu. Rev. Physiol.* 68, 375-401. doi: 675 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.134728.

676 Cuin, T.A., Zhou, M., Parsons, D., and Shabala, S. (2012). Genetic behaviour of 677 physiological traits conferring cytosolic K⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis in wheat. *Plant 678 Biol. (Stuttg)* 14, 438-446.

679 Chen, G., Hu, Q., Luo, L., Yang, T., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., Yu, L., and Xu, G. (2015). Rice 680 potassium transporter OsHAK1 is essential for maintaining potassium-mediated 681 growth and functions in salt tolerance over low and high potassium 682 concentration ranges. *Plant Cell Environ.* 38, 2747-2765. doi: 683 684 10.1111/pce.12585.

685 Cheng, D., Wu, G., and Zheng, Y. (2015). Positive correlation between potassium 686 uptake and salt tolerance in wheat. *Photosynth.* 53, 447-454. doi: 687 688 10.1007/s11099-015-0124-3.

689 D'onofrio, C., Kader, A., and Lindberg, S. (2005). Uptake of sodium in quince, sugar 690 beet, and wheat protoplasts determined by the fluorescent sodium-binding dye 691 benzofuran isophthalate. *J. Plant Physiol.* 162, 421-428.

690 Daram, P., Urbach, S., Gaymard, F., Sentenac, H., and Cherel, I. (1997). 691 Tetramerization of the AKT1 plant potassium channel involves its C- terminal 692 cytoplasmic domain. *EMBO J* 16, 3455-3463.

693 Davenport, R. (2002). Glutamate Receptors in Plants. *Annals Bot.* 90, 549-557. doi: 694 695 10.1093/aob/mcf228.

695 Deeken, R., Geiger, D., Fromm, J., Koroleva, O., Ache, P., Langenfeld-Heyser, R., 696 Sauer, N., May, S., and Hedrich, R. (2002). Loss of the AKT2/3 potassium
697 channel affects sugar loading into the phloem of Arabidopsis. *Planta* 216, 334 - 344.

699 Demidchik, V., and Maathuis, F. (2007). Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: from salt stress to signalling and development. *New Phytol.* 701 175, 387 - 404.

702 Demidchik, V., and Tester, M. (2002). Sodium fluxes through nonselective cation channels in the plasma membrane of protoplasts from Arabidopsis roots. *Plant Physiol.* 128, 379-387.

705 Drew, M.C. (1975). Comparison of effects of a localized supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on growth of seminal root system, and shoot, in barley. *New Phytol.* 75, 479-490.

708 Duby, G., Hosy, E., Fizames, C., Alcon, C., Costa, A., Sentenac, H., and Thibaud, J.B. (2008). AtKC1, a conditionally targeted Shaker-type subunit, regulates the activity of plant K+ channels. *Plant J.* 53, 115-123.

711 Engels, C., and Marschner, H. (1992). Adaptation of potassium translocation into the shoot of maize (Zea mays) to shoot demand: Evidence for xylem loading as a regulating step. *Physiol. Plant.* 86, 263-268. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1992.860211.x.

715 Epstein, E., and Hagen, C.E. (1952). A kinetic study of the absorption of alkali cations by barley roots. *Plant Pshyiol.* 27, 457-474.

717 Epstein, E., Rains, D.W., and Elzam, O.E. (1963). Resolution of dual mechanisms of potassium absorption by barley roots. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* 49, 684-692.

719 Essah, P.A., Davenport, R., and Tester, M. (2003). Sodium influx and accumulation in Arabidopsis. *Plant Physiology.* 133, 307-318.

721 Eynard, A., Lal, R., and Wiebe, K. (2005). Crop response in salt-affected soils. *J. of Sus. Agri.* 27, 5-50.

723 Fernandez-Pozo, N., Menda, N., Edwards, J.D., Saha, S., Tecle, I.Y., Strickler, S.R., Bombarely, A., Fisher-York, T., Pujar, A., Foerster, H., Yan, A., and Mueller, L.A. (2015). The Sol Genomics Network (SGN)--from genotype to phenotype to breeding. *Nucl. Acids Res.* 43, D1036-1041. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1195.

727 Gao, Q.F., Fei, C.F., Dong, J.Y., Gu, L.L., and Wang, Y.F. (2014). Arabidopsis CNGC18 is a Ca²⁺-permeable channel. *Mol. Plant* 7, 739-743.

729 Gao, Q.F., Gu, L.L., Wang, H.Q., Fei, C.F., Fang, X., Hussain, J., Sun, S.J., Dong, J.Y., Liu, H., and Wang, Y.F. (2016). Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 18 is an essential Ca2+ channel in pollen tube tips for pollen tube guidance to ovules in Arabidopsis. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* 113, 3096-3101.

733 Garcia De La Garma, J., Fernandez-Garcia, N., Bardisi, E., Pallol, B., Asensio-Rubio, J.S., Bru, R., and Olmos, E. (2015). New insights into plant salt acclimation: the roles of vesicle trafficking and reactive oxygen species signalling in mitochondria and the endomembrane system. *New Phytol.* 205, 216-239. doi: 10.1111/nph.12997.

738 Garciadeblas, B., Benito, B., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2002). Molecular cloning and functional expression in bacteria of the potassium transporters CnHAK1 and CnHAK2 of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. *Plant Mol. Biol.* 50, 623-633.

741 Garciadeblas, B., Senn, M.E., Bax Uelos, M.A., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2003). Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. *Plant J.* 34, 788-801.

743 Gattward, J.N., Almeida, A.-a.F., Souza, J.O., Jr., Gomes, F.P., and Kronzucker, H.J. (2012). Sodium-potassium synergism in Theobroma cacao: stimulation of photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and mineral nutrition. *Physiol. Plant.* 146, 350-362.
747 Gaymard, F., Cerutti, M., Horeau, C., Lemaillet, G., Urbach, S., Ravallec, M.,
748 Devauchelle, G., Sentenac, H., and Thibaud, J.B. (1996). The baculovirus/insect
749 cell system as an alternative to xenopus oocytes. *J. Biol. Chem.* 271, 22863-
750 22870.

751 Geiger, D., Becker, D., Vosloh, D., Gambale, F., Palme, K., Rehers, M., Anschuetz, U.,
752 Dreyer, I., Kudla, J., and Hedrich, R. (2009). Heteromeric AtKC1/AKT1
753 channels in Arabidopsis roots facilitate growth under K⁺ limiting conditions. *J.
754 Biol. Chem.* 284, 21288-21295.

755 Geldner, N. (2013). The endodermis. *Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.* 64, 531-558.

756 Gierth, M., Maser, P., and Schroeder, J.I. (2005). The potassium transporter AtHAK5
757 functions in K⁺ deprivation-induced high-affinity K⁺ uptake and AKT1 K⁺
758 channel contribution to K⁺ uptake kinetics in arabidopsis roots. *Plant Physiol.*
759 137, 1105-1114.

760 Glass, A. (1976). Regulation of potassium absorption in barley roots. An allosteric
761 model. *Plant Physio.l* 58, 33-37.

762 Golldack, D., Quigley, F., Michalowski, C.B., Kamasani, U.R., and Bohnert, H.J.
763 (2003). Salinity stress-tolerant and -sensitive rice (Oryza sativa L.) regulate
764 AKT1-type potassium channel transcripts differently. *Plant Mol.Biol.* 51, 71-81.

765 Grabov, A. (2007). Plant KT/KUP/HAK potassium transporters: single family -
766 multiple functions. *Anna. Bot.* 99, 1035-1041.

767 Hafsi, C., Debez, A., and Abdelly, C. (2014). Potassium deficiency in plants: effects
768 and signaling cascades. *Acta Physiol. Plant.* 36, 1055-1070.

769 Han, M., Wu, W., Wu, W.-H., and Wang, Y. (2016). Potassium transporter KUP7 is
770 involved in K⁺ acquisition and translocation in *Arabidopsis* root under K⁺-
771 limited conditions. *Mol. Plant*. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.012.

772 Haro, R., Banuelos, M.A., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2010). High-affinity sodium
773 uptake in land plants. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 51, 68-79.

774 Hernandez, M., Fernandez-Garcia, N., Garcia-Garma, J., Rubio-Asensio, J.S., Rubio, F.,
775 and Olmos, E. (2012). Potassium starvation induces oxidative stress in Solanum
776 lycopersicum L. roots. *J. Plant Physiol.* 169, 1366-1374. doi:
777 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.05.015.

778 Hille, B. (1992). *Ionic channels of excitable membranes*. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
779 Associates, Inc.

780 Hirsch, R.E., Lewis, B.D., Spalding, E.P., and Sussman, M.R. (1998). A role for the
781 AKT1 potassium channel in plant nutrition. *Science* 280, 918-921.

782 Ho, C.H., Lin, S.H., Hu, H.C., and Tsay, Y.F. (2009). CHL1 functions as a nitrate
783 sensor in plants. *Cell* 138, 1184-1194.

784 Hong, J.P., Takeshi, Y., Kondou, Y., Schachtman, D.P., Matsui, M., and Shin, R.
785 (2013). Identification and characterization of transcription factors regulating
786 Arabidopsis HAK5. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 54, 1478-1490. doi:
787 10.1093/pcp/pct094.

788 Honsbein, A., Sokolovski, S., Grefen, C., Campanoni, P., Pratelli, R., Paneque, M.,
789 Chen, Z., Johansson, I., and Blatt, M.R. (2009). A tripartite snare-K⁺ channel
790 complex mediates in channel-dependent K⁺ nutrition in Arabidopsis. *Plant Cell*
791 21, 2859-2877.

792 Hoopen, F.T., Cuin, T.A., Pedas, P., Hegelund, J.N., Shabala, S., Schjoerring, J.K., and
793 Jahn, T.P. (2010). Competition between uptake of ammonium and potassium in
794 barley and Arabidopsis roots: molecular mechanisms and physiological
795 consequences. *J. Exp. Bot.* 61, 2303-2315. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq057.
796 Horie, T., Costa, A., Kim, T.H., Han, M.J., Horie, R., Leung, H.Y., Miyao, A.,
797 Hirochika, H., An, G., and Schroeder, J.I. (2007). Rice OsHKT2;1 transporter
798 mediates large Na+ influx component into K+-starved roots for growth. *Embo J.
799 26, 3003-3014.

800 Horie, T., Sugawara, M., Okada, T., Taira, K., Kaothien-Nakayama, P., Katsuhara, M.,
801 Shinmyo, A., and Nakayama, H. (2011). Rice sodium-insensitive potassium
802 transporter, OsHAK5, confers increased salt tolerance in tobacco BY2 cells. *J.
803 Biosci. Bioeng.* 111, 346-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.10.014.

804 Horie, T., Yoshida, K., Nakayama, H., Yamada, K., Oiki, S., and Shinmyo, A. (2001).
805 Two types of HKT transporters with different properties of Na⁺ and K⁺ transport
806 in Oryza sativa. *Plant J.* 27, 129-138.

807 Jabnoune, M., Espeout, S., Mieulet, D., Fizames, C., Verdeil, J.L., Conejero, G.,
808 Rodriguez-Navarro, A., Sentenac, H., Guiderdoni, E., Abdelly, C., and Very,
809 A.A. (2009). Diversity in expression patterns and functional properties in the
810 rice HKT transporter family. *Plant Physiol.* 150, 1955-1971.

811 Jones, R.G. (1983). *Proteins, enzymes and inorganic ions Ency. Plant Physiol.. New
812 series*.

813 Jung, J.Y., Shin, R., and Schachtman, D.P. (2009). Ethylene mediates response and
tolerance to potassium deprivation in Arabidopsis. *Plant Cell* 21, 607-621.

815 Kellermeier, F., Armengaud, P., Seditas, T.J., Danku, J., Salt, D.E., and Amtmann, A.
816 (2014). Analysis of the root system architecture of Arabidopsis provides a
817 quantitative readout of crosstalk between nutritional signals. *Plant Cell* 26,
818 1480-1496. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122101.

819 Ketchum, K.A., and Poole, R.J. (1991). Cytosolic calcium regulates a potassium current
820 in corn (Zea mays) protoplasts. *J. Membr. Biol.* 119, 277-288.

821 Khayyat, M., Tafazoli, E., Rajaee, S., Vazifeshenas, M., Mahmoo-Dabadi, M.R., and
822 Sajjadinia, A. (2009). Effects of NaCl and supple-mentary potassium on gas
823 exchange, ionic content, and growth of salt-stressed strawberry plants. *J. Plant
824 Nutr.* 32, 907-918.

825 Kim, E.J., Kwak, J.M., Uozumi, N., and Schroeder, J.I. (1998). AtKUP1: an
826 Arabidopsis gene encoding high-affinity potassium transport activity. *Plant Cell
827 10, 51-62.

828 Kim, M.J., Ruzicka, D., Shin, R., and Schachtman, D.P. (2012). The Arabidopsis
829 AP2/ERF Transcription Factor RAP2.11 Modulates Plant Response to Low-
830 Potassium Conditions. *Mol. Plant* 5, 1042-1057. doi:
831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss003.

832 Kirkby, E., and Schubert, S. (2013). Management of potassium in plant and soil systems
833 in China. *J. Plant Nutri. Soil Sci.* 176, 303-304. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201390018.

834 Kochian, L.V., and Lucas, W.J. (1982). Potassium transport in corn roots : I. Resolution
835 of kinetics into a saturable and linear component. *Plant Physiol.* 70, 1723-1731.
836 doi: 10.1104/pp.70.6.1723.

837 Krishnamurthy, P., Jyothi-Prakash, P.A., Qin, L., He, J., Lin, Q., Loh, C.-S., and
838 Kumar, P.P. (2014). Role of root hydrophobic barriers in salt exclusion of a
839 mangrove plant Avicennia officinalis. *Plant Cell Environ.* 37, 1656-1671. doi:
840 10.1111/pce.12272.

841 Kronzucker, H.J., and Britto, D.T. (2011). Sodium transport in plants: a critical review.
842 *New Phytol* 189, 54-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03540.x.

843 Kronzucker, H.J., Coskun, D., Schulze, L.M., Wong, J.R., and Britto, D.T. (2013).
844 Sodium as nutrient and toxicant. *Plant Soil* 369, 1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1801-2.
846 Kronzucker, H.J., Szczerba, M.W., and Britto, D.T. (2003). Cytosolic potassium
847 homeostasis revisited: K<sup>-</sup><sup>42</sup>-tracer analysis in Hordeum vulgare L. reveals set-
848 point variations in [K<sup>+</sup>]. *Planta* 217, 540-546.

849 Kronzucker, H.J., Szczerba, M.W., Moazami-Goudarzi, M.a.R.Y., and Britto, D.T. (2006). The cytosolic Na<sup>+</sup>:K<sup>+</sup> ratio does not explain salinity-induced growth impairment in barley: a dual-tracer study using <sup>42</sup>K<sup>+</sup> and <sup>24</sup>Na<sup>+</sup>. *Plant Cell Environ.* 29, 2228-2237.

853 Kronzucker, H.J., Szczerba, M.W., Schulze, L.M., and Britto, D.T. (2008). Non-reciprocal interactions between K⁺ and Na⁺ ions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). *J. Exp. Bot.* 59, 2793-2801.

856 Lagarde, D., Basset, M., Lepetit, M., Conejero, G., Gaymard, F., Astruc, S., and Grignon, C. (1996). Tissue-specific expression of Arabidopsis AKT1 gene is consistent with a role in K⁺ nutrition. *Plant J.* 9, 195-203.

859 Latz, A., Ivashikina, N., Fischer, S., Ache, P., Sano, T., Becker, D., Deeken, R., and Hedrich, R. (2007). In planta AKT2 subunits constitute a pH- and Ca²⁺-sensitive inward rectifying K⁺ channel. *Planta* 225, 1179-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0428-4.

863 Lauchli, A. (1972). Translocation of inorganic solutes. *Ann. Review Plant Physiol.* 23, 197-&. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.23.060172.001213.

865 Leigh, R.A., and Wyn Jones, R.G. (1984). A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant-cell. *New Phytol.* 97, 1-13.

868 Léran, S., Edel, K.H., Pervent, M., Hashimoto, K., Corratgé-Faillie, C., Offenborn, J.N., 869 Tillard, P., Gojon, A., Kudla, J., and Lacombe, B. (2015). Nitrate sensing and 870 uptake in Arabidopsis are enhanced by ABI2, a phosphatase inactivated by the 871 stress hormone abscisic acid. *Sci. Signal.* 8, ra43-ra43. doi: 872 10.1126/scisignal.aaa4829.

873 Li, J., Long, Y., Qi, G.-N., Li, J., Xu, Z.-J., Wu, W.-H., and Wang, Y. (2014). The os-874 akt1 channel is critical for K⁺ uptake in rice roots and is modulated by the rice 875 CBL1-CIPK23 complex. *Plant Cell* 26, 3387-3402. doi: 876 10.1105/tpc.114.123455.

877 Li, L., Kim, B.G., Cheong, Y.H., Pandey, G.K., and Luan, S. (2006). A Ca²⁺ signaling 878 pathway regulates a K⁺ channel for low-K⁺ response in Arabidopsis. *Proc. Natl. 879 Acad. Sci. USA* 103, 12625-12630.

880 Luan, S. (2009). The CBL-CIPK network in plant calcium signaling. *Trends Plant Sci.* 881 14, 37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.005.

882 Maathuis, F.J., Ichida, A.M., Sanders, D., and Schroeder, J.I. (1997). Roles of higher 883 plant K⁺ channels. *Plant Physiol.* 114, 1141-1149.

884 Maathuis, F.J., and Sanders, D. (1996a). Characterization of csi52, a Cs⁺ resistant 885 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana altered in K⁺ transport. *Plant J.* 10, 579-589.

886 Maathuis, F.J., and Sanders, D. (2001). Sodium uptake in Arabidopsis roots is regulated 887 by cyclic nucleotides. *Plant Physiol.* 127, 1617-1625.

888 Maathuis, F.J.M. (2014). Sodium in plants: perception, signalling, and regulation of 889 sodium fluxes. *J. Exp. Bot.* 65, 849-858. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert326.

890 Maathuis, F.J.M., and Amtmann, A. (1999). K⁺ Nutrition and Na⁺ toxicity: The basis of 891 cellular K⁺/Na⁺ ratios. *Ann. Bot.* 84, 123-133.

892 Maathuis, F.J.M., and Sanders, D. (1993). Energization of potassium uptake in 893 *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *Planta* 191, 302-307.

894 Maathuis, F.J.M., and Sanders, D. (1996b). Mechanisms of potassium absorption by 895 higher plant roots. *Physiol. Plant.* 96, 158-168.
896 Malagoli, P., Britto, D.T., Schulze, L.M., and Kronzucker, H.J. (2008). Futile Na⁺
897 cycling at the root plasma membrane in rice (Oryza sativa L.): kinetics,
898 energetics, and relationship to salinity tolerance. *J. Exp. Bot.* 59, 4109-4117.
899 Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants (Third Edition).
900 San Diego: Academic Press.
901 Martínez-Cordero, M.A., Martinez, V., and Rubio, F. (2005). High-affinity K⁺ uptake in
902 pepper plants. *J. Exp. Bot.* 56, 1553-1562.
903 Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A., Kosegarten, H., and Appel, T. (2001). Principles on plant
904 nutrition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
905 Mian, A., Oomen, R.J.F.J., Isayenkov, S., Sentenac, H., Maathuis, F.J.M., and Very, A.-
906 A. (2011). Over-expression of an Na⁺- and K⁺-permeable HKT transporter in
907 barley improves salt tolerance. *Plant J.* 68, 468-479.
908 Moody, P.W., and Bell, M.J. (2006). Availability of soil potassium and diagnostic soil
909 tests. *Austr. J. Soil Res.* 44, 265-275.
910 Morgan, S.H., Maity, P.J., Geilfus, C.M., Lindberg, S., and Muehling, K.H. (2014).
911 Leaf ion homeostasis and plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase activity in *Vicia faba*
912 change after extra calcium and potassium supply under salinity. *Plant Physiol.*
913 *Biochem.* 82, 244-253. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.06.010.
914 Munns, R., and Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. *Ann. Rev. Plant
915 Biol.* 59, 651-681.
916 Nam, Y.-J., Tran, L.-S.P., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., Nishiyama, R., and Shin, R.
917 (2012). Regulatory roles of cytokinins and cytokinin signaling in response to
918 potassium deficiency in *Arabidopsis*. *PLoS ONE* 7, e47797. doi:
919 10.1371/journal.pone.0047797.
920 Newton, R.P., and Smith, C.J. (2004). Cyclic nucleotides. *Phytochem.* 65, 2423-2437.
921 doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.07.026.
922 Nieves-Cordones, M., Aleman, F., Martinez, V., and Rubio, F. (2010). The Arabidopsis
923 thaliana HAK5 K⁺ transporter is required for plant growth and K⁺ acquisition
924 from low K⁺ solutions under saline conditions. *Mol. Plant* 3, 326-333. doi:
925 10.1093/mp/ssp102.
926 Nieves-Cordones, M., Alemán, F., Martínez, V., and Rubio, F. (2014). K⁺ uptake in
927 plant roots. The systems involved, their regulation and parallels in other
928 organisms. *J. Plant Physiol.* 171, 688-695. doi:
929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.09.021.
930 Nieves-Cordones, M., Martinez-Cordero, M.A., Martinez, V., and Rubio, F. (2007). An
931 NH4⁺-sensitive component dominates high-affinity K⁺ uptake in tomato plants.
932 *Plant Sci.* 172, 273-280.
933 Nieves-Cordones, M., Miller, A., Alemán, F., Martínez, V., and Rubio, F. (2008). A
934 putative role for the plasma membrane potential in the control of the expression
935 of the gene encoding the tomato high-affinity potassium transporter HAK5.
936 *Plant Mol. Biol.* 68, 521-532.
937 Nieves-Cordones, M., Rodenas, R., Chavanieu, A., Rivero, R.M., Martinez, V.,
938 Gaillard, I., and Rubio, F. (2016). Uneven HAK/KUP/KT protein diversity
939 among angiosperms: species distribution and perspectives. *Front. Plant Sci.* 7.
940 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00127.
941 Oomen, R.J.F.J., Benito, B., Sentenac, H., Rodriguez-Navarro, A., Talon, M., Very, A.-
942 A., and Domingo, C. (2012). HKT2;2/1, a K⁺-permeable transporter identified in
943 a salt-tolerant rice cultivar through surveys of natural genetic polymorphism.
944 *Plant J.* 71, 750-762.
945 Osakabe, Y., Arinaga, N., Umezawa, T., Katsura, S., Nagamachi, K., Tanaka, H.,
946 Ohiraki, H., Yamada, K., Seo, S.-U., Abo, M., Yoshimura, E., Shinozaki, K.,
947 and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2013). Osmotic stress responses and plant
948 growth controlled by potassium transporters in Arabidopsis. *Plant Cell*. doi:
949 10.1105/tpc.112.105700.

950 Peterson, C.A., Emanuel, M.E., and Humphreys, G.B. (1981). Pathway of movement of
951 apoplastic fluorescent dye tracers through the endodermis at the site of
952 secondary root-formation in corn (*Zea mays*) and broad bean (*Vicia faba*). *Can.
953 J. Bot.-Revue Can. Bota*. 59, 618-&.

954 Pilot, G., Gaymard, F., Mouline, K., Cherel, I., and Sentenac, H. (2003). Regulated
955 expression of Arabidopsis Shaker K⁺ channel genes involved in K⁺ uptake and
distribution in the plant. *Plant Mol. Biol*.51, 773-787.

957 Platten, J.D., Cotsaftis, O., Berthomieu, P., Bohnert, H., Davenport, R.J., Fairbairn,
958 D.J., Horie, T., Leigh, R.A., Lin, H.X., Luan, S., Maser, P., Pantoja, O.,
959 Rodriguez-Navarro, A., Schachtman, D.P., Schroeder, J.I., Sentenac, H.,
960 Uozumi, N., Very, A.A., Zhu, J.K., Dennis, E.S., and Tester, M. (2006).
961 Nomenclature for HKT transporters, key determinants of plant salinity tolerance.
962 *Trends Plant Sci*. 11, 372-374.

963 Pyo, Y.J., Gierth, M., Schroeder, J.I., and Cho, M.H. (2010). High-affinity K⁺ transport
964 in arabidopsis: AtHAK5 and AKT1 are vital for seedling establishment and
965 postgermination growth under low-potassium conditions. *Plant Physiol.* 153,
966 863-875. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154369.

967 Qi, Z., Hampton, C.R., Shin, R., Barkla, B.J., White, P.J., and Schachtman, D.P. (2008).
968 The high affinity K⁺ transporter AtHAK5 plays a physiological role in planta at
969 very low K⁺ concentrations and provides a caesium uptake pathway in
970 Arabidopsis. *J. Exp. Bot*. 59, 595-607.

971 Ragel, P., Rodenas, R., Garcia-Martin, E., Andres, Z., Villalta, I., Nieves-Cordones, M.,
972 Rivero, R.M., Martinez, V., Pardo, J.M., Quintero, F.J., and Rubio, F. (2015).
973 The CBL-interacting protein kinase CIPK23 regulates HAK5-mediated high-
974 affinity K⁺ uptake in Arabidopsis roots. *Plant Physiol.* 169, 2863-2873. doi:
975 10.1104/pp.15.01401.

976 Rains, D.W., and Epstein, E. (1967a). Sodium absorption by barley roots: its mediation
977 by mechanism 2 of alkali cation transport. *Plant Physiol.* 42, 319-323.

978 Rains, D.W., and Epstein, E. (1967b). Sodium absorption by barley roots: role of the
979 dual mechanisms of alkali cation transport. *Plant Physiol* 42, 314-318.

980 Reintanz, B., Szyroki, A., Ivashikina, N., Ache, P., Godde, M., Becker, D., Palme, K.,
981 and Hedrich, R. (2002). AtKC1, a silent Arabidopsis potassium channel alpha -
982 subunit modulates root hair K⁺ influx. *Proc. Natil. Acad. Sci. USA* 99, 4079-
983 4084.

984 Ren, X.-L., Qi, G.-N., Feng, H.-Q., Zhao, S., Zhao, S.-S., Wang, Y., and Wu, W.-H.
985 (2013). Calcineurin B-like protein CBL10 directly interacts with AKT1 and
986 modulates K⁺ homeostasis in Arabidopsis. *Plant Jo*. 74, 258-266. doi:
987 10.1111/tpj.12123.

988 Rodrigues, C.R.F., Silveira, J.a.G., Silva, E.N., Dutra, A.T.B., and Viegas, R.A. (2012).
989 Potassium transport and partitioning alle- viates toxic effects of sodium on
990 young physic nut plants. *Rev. Bras. Cien. Solo* 36, 223-232.

991 Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2000). Potassium transport in fungi and plants. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* 1469, 1-30.

993 Römheld, V., and Kirkby, E. (2010). Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and
994 prospects. *Plant Soil* 335, 155-180.
995 Rubio, F., Alemán, F., Nieves-Cordones, M., and Martínez, V. (2010). Studies on
996 Arabidopsis *athak5*, *atakt1* double mutants disclose the range of concentrations
997 at which AtHAK5, AtAKT1 and unknown systems mediate K⁺ uptake. *Physiol.
998 Plant*. 139, 220-228.

999 Rubio, F., Flores, P., Navarro, J.M., and Martinez, V. (2003). Effects of Ca²⁺, K⁺ and
cGMP on Na⁺ uptake in pepper plants. *Plant Sci.* 165, 1043-1049.

1001 Rubio, F., Fon, M., Rodenas, R., Nieves-Cordones, M., Aleman, F., Rivero, R.M., and Martinez, V. (2014). A low K⁺ signal is required for functional high-affinity K⁺ uptake through HAK5 transporters. *Physiol. Plant*. 152, 558-570. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12205.

1005 Rubio, F., Gassmann, W., and Schroeder, J.I. (1995). Sodium-driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. *Science* 270, 1660-1663.

1008 Rubio, F., Nieves-Cordones, M., Alemán, F., and Martinez, V. (2008). Relative
1009 contribution of AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 to K⁺ uptake in the high-affinity range of
1010 concentrations *Physiol. Plant*. 134, 598-608.

1011 Rubio, F., Santa-Maria, G.E., and Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2000). Cloning of
1012 Arabidopsis and barley cDNAs encoding HAK potassium transporters in root
1013 and shoot cells. *Physiol. Plant* 109, 34-43.

1014 Salvador-Recatala, V. (2016). The AKT2 potassium channel mediates NaCl induced
depolarization in the root of *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *Plant Signal Behav.* 11,
e1165381. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1165381.

1017 Santa-Maria, G.E., Danna, C.H., and Czibener, C. (2000). High-affinity potassium
transport in barley roots. Ammonium-sensitive and -insensitive pathways. *Plant
Physiol.* 123, 297-306.

1020 Santa-Maria, G.E., Rubio, F., Dubcovsky, J., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (1997). The
1021 *hak1* gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-
1022 affinity potassium transporter. *Plant Cell* 9, 2281-2289.

1023 Sassi, A., Mieulet, D., Khan, I., Moreau, B., Gaillard, I., Sentenac, H., and Very, A.A. (2012). The rice monovalent cation transporter OsHKT2;4: revisited ionic selectivity. *Plant Physiol.* 160, 498-510.

1026 Sattelmacher, B., Muhling, K.H., and Pennewiss, K. (1998). The apoplast - its
1027 significance for the nutrition of higher plants. *Zeit. Fur Pflanzen. Boden*. 161,
1028 485-498.

1029 Schachtman, D.P. (2015). The role of ethylene in plant response to K⁺ deficiency.
*Front. Plant Sci.* 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01153.

1031 Schreiber, L., Hartmann, K., Skrabs, M., and Zeier, J. (1999). Apoplastic barriers in
1032 roots: chemical composition of endodermal and hypodermal cell walls. *J. Exp.
1033 Bot.* 50, 1267-1280.

1034 Sentenac, H., Bonneaud, N., Minet, M., Lacroute, F., Salmon, J.M., Gaymard, F., and
1035 Grignon, C. (1992). Cloning and expression in yeast of a plant potassium ion
1036 transport system. *Science* 256, 663-665.

1037 Shen, Y., Shen, L., Shen, Z., Jing, W., Ge, H., Zhao, J., and Zhang, W. (2015). The
1038 potassium transporter OsHAK21 functions in the maintenance of ion
1039 homeostasis and tolerance to salt stress in rice. *Plant Cell Environ.* 38, 2766-
1040 2779. doi: 10.1111/pce.12586.

1041 Shin, R., Berg, R.H., and Schachtman, D.P. (2005). Reactive oxygen species and root
1042 hairs in arabidopsis root response to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium
deficiency. *Plant Cell Physiol.* 46, 1350-1357. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci145.
1044 Shin, R., and Schachtman, D.P. (2004). Hydrogen peroxide mediates plant root cell response to nutrient deprivation. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* 101, 8827-8832.

1045 Siddiqi, M.Y., and Glass, A.D. (1986). A model for the regulation of k influx, and tissue potassium concentrations by negative feedback effects upon plasmalemma influx. *Plant Physiol.* 81, 1-7.

1049 Spalding, E.P., Hirsch, R.E., Lewis, D.R., Qi, Z., Sussman, M.R., and Lewis, B.D. (1999). Potassium uptake supporting plant growth in the absence of AKT1 channel activity: Inhibition by ammonium and stimulation by sodium. *J. Gen. Physiol.* 113, 909-918.

1053 Stewart, W.M., Dibb, D.W., Johnston, A.E., and Smyth, T.J. (2005). The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. *Agronomy Journal* 97, 1-6.

1055 Subbarao, G.V., Ito, O., Berry, W.L., and Wheeler, R.M. (2003). Sodium - A functional plant nutrient. *Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.* 22, 391-416.

1057 Szczerba, M.W., Britto, D.T., and Kronzucker, H.J. (2006). Rapid, futile K⁺ cycling and pool-size dynamics define low-affinity potassium transport in barley. *Plant Physiol.* 141, 1494-1507.

1060 Taiz, L., and Zeiger, E. (1991). *Plant Physiology*.

1061 Takahashi, R., Liu, S., and Takano, T. (2007). Cloning and functional comparison of a high-affinity K⁺ transporter gene PhaHKT1 of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive reed plants. *J. Exp. Bot.* 58, 4387-4395.

1064 Takehisa, H., Sato, Y., Antonio, B., and Nagamura, Y. (2013). Global transcriptome profile of rice root in response to essential macronutrient deficiency. *Plant Sign. Behav.* 8.

1067 Tester, M., and Leigh, R.A. (2001). Partitioning of nutrient transport processes in roots. *J. Exp. Bot.* 52, 445-457.

1069 Trewavas, A.J. (1997). Plant cyclic AMP comes in from the cold. *Nature* 390, 657-658.

1070 Tsay, Y.-F., Ho, C.-H., Chen, H.-Y., and Lin, S.-H. (2011). Integration of nitrogen and potassium signaling. *Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.* 62, 207-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103837.

1073 Tyerman, S.D., Skerrett, M., Garrill, A., Findlay, G.P., and Leigh, R.A. (1997). Pathways for the permeation of Na⁺ and Cl⁻ into protoplasts derived from the cortex of wheat roots. *J. Exp. Bot.* 48, 459-480.

1076 Véry, A.-A., and Davies, J.M. (2000). Hyperpolarization-activated calcium channels at the tip of Arabidopsis root hairs. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* 97, 9801-9806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160250397.

1079 Véry, A.-A., Nieves-Cordones, M., Daly, M., Khan, I., Fizames, C., and Sentenac, H. (2014). Molecular biology of K⁺ transport across the plant cell membrane: What do we learn from comparison between plant species? *J. Plant Physiol.* 171, 748-769. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.011.

1083 Very, A.A., and Sentenac, H. (2002). Cation channels in the Arabidopsis plasma membrane. *Trends Plant Sci.* 7, 168-175.

1085 Wakeel, A. (2013). Potassium-sodium interactions in soil and plant under saline-sodic conditions. *J. Plant Nutri. Soil Sci.* 176, 344-354. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201200417.

1087 Wakeel, A., Farooq, M., Qadir, M., and Schubert, S. (2011). Potassium substitution by sodium in plants. *Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.* 30, 401-413. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.587728.

1090 Wakeel, A., Steffens, D., and Schubert, S. (2010). Potassium substitution by sodium in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) nutrition on K-fixing soils. *J. Plant Nutri. Soil Sci.* 173, 127-134. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200900270.
1093 Walker, D.J., Black, C.R., and Miller, A.J. (1998). The role of cytosolic potassium and
ph in the growth of barley roots. *Plant Physiol.* 118, 957-964.

1094 Walker, D.J., Leigh, R.A., and Miller, A.J. (1996). Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate
plant cells. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* 93, 10510-10514.

1097 Wang, B., Davenport, R.J., Volkov, V., and Amtmann, A. (2006). Low unidirectional
1098 sodium influx into root cells restricts net sodium accumulation in Thellungiella
1099 halophila, a salt-tolerant relative of *Arabidopsis thaliana*. *J. Exp. Bot.* 57, 1161-
1100 1170.

1101 Wang, X.P., Chen, L.M., Liu, W.X., Shen, L., Wang, F.L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z., Wu,
1102 W.H., and Wang, Y. (2016). AtKC1 and CIPK23 synergistically modulate
1103 AKT1-mediated low potassium stress responses in Arabidopsis. *Plant Physiol.*
1104 doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01493.

1105 Wang, Y., He, L., Li, H.D., Xu, J.A., and Wu, W.H. (2010). Potassium channel alpha-
1106 subunit AtKC1 negatively regulates AKT1-mediated K⁺ uptake in Arabidopsis
1107 roots under low-K⁺ stress. *Cell Res.* 20, 826-837. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.74.

1108 White, P.J., and Broadley, M.R. (2000). Mechanisms of caesium uptake by plants. *New
1109 Phytol.* 147, 241-256. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00704.x.

1110 Xia, J., Kong, D., Xue, S., Tian, W., Li, N., Bao, F., Hu, Y., Du, J., Wang, Y., Pan, X.,
1111 Wang, L., Zhang, X., Niu, G., Feng, X., Li, L., and He, Y. (2014). Nitric oxide
1112 negatively regulates AKT1-mediated potassium uptake through modulating
1113 vitamin B6 homeostasis in Arabidopsis. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* doi:
1114 10.1073/pnas.1417473111.

1115 Xu, J., Li, H.D., Chen, L.Q., Wang, Y., Liu, L.L., He, L., and Wu, W.H. (2006). A
1116 protein kinase, interacting with two calcineurin B-like proteins, regulates K⁺
1117 transporter AKT1 in Arabidopsis. *Cell* 125, 1347-1360.

1118 Yang, T., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., Wu, F., Hu, Q., Chen, G., Cai, J., Wu, T., Moran, N., Yu,
1119 L., and Xu, G. (2014). The role of a potassium transporter oshak5 in potassium
1120 acquisition and transport from roots to shoots in rice at low potassium supply
1121 levels. *Plant Physiol.* 166, 945-959.

1122 Yao, X., Horie, T., Xue, S., Leung, H.Y., Katsuhara, M., Brodsky, D.E., Wu, Y., and
1123 Schroeder, J.I. (2010). Differential sodium and potassium transport selectivities
1124 of the rice OsHKT2;1 and OsHKT2;2 transporters in plant cells. *Plant Physiol.*
1125 152, 341-355.

1126 Yeo, A.R., Yeo, M.E., and Flowers, T.J. (1987). The Contribution of an Apoplastic
1127 Pathway to Sodium Uptake by Rice Roots in Saline Conditions. *J. Expe. Bot.*38,
1128 1141-1153. doi: 10.1093/jxb/38.7.1141.

1129 Zhang, B., Karnik, R., Wang, Y., Wallmeroth, N., Blatt, M.R., and Grefen, C. (2015).
1130 The Arabidopsis R-SNARE VAMP721 Interacts with KAT1 and KC1 K⁺
1131 channels to moderate k⁺ current at the plasma membrane. *Plant Cell* 27, 1697-
1132 1717.

1133 Zörb, C., Senbayram, M., and Peiter, E. (2014). Potassium in agriculture – Status and
1134 perspectives. *J.Plant Physiol.* doi:
1135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008.

1136

1137

1138
<table><caption>Table 1. Summary for K⁺ and Na⁺ uptake features observed in Arabidopsis and rice roots</caption><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>Cation</th><th>Type of uptake<sup>†</sup></th><th>K<sub>m</sub> (µM)</th><th>Sensitivity</th><th>Transport systems involved</th><th>References</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">Arabidopsis</td><td rowspan="2">K<sup>+</sup></td><td>High-affinity</td><td>24*</td><td>(-) NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, Ba<sup>+2</sup>, Cs<sup>+</sup><br>(=) Ca<sup>+2</sup></td><td>AtHAK5, AKT1</td><td>1, 2, 3, 4</td></tr><tr><td>Low-affinity</td><td>3,991*</td><td>(-) Ba<sup>+2</sup>, Cs<sup>+</sup>, TEA, La<sup>+3</sup>,<br>Na<sup>+</sup><br>(=) NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>+2</sup></td><td>AKT1</td><td>1, 4, 5</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Na<sup>+</sup></td><td>High-affinity</td><td>n.d.</td><td>n.d.</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Low-affinity</td><td>Linear response</td><td>(-) Ca<sup>+2</sup>, Ba<sup>+2</sup>, Cyclic-nucleotides<br>(+) La<sup>+3</sup>, GABA<br>(=) TEA, Cs<sup>+</sup></td><td>-</td><td>6, 7</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Rice</td><td rowspan="2">K<sup>+</sup></td><td>High-affinity</td><td>11-18</td><td>(-) NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup></td><td>OsHAK1, OsHAK5,<br>OsAKT1</td><td>8, 9, 10, 11</td></tr><tr><td>Low-affinity</td><td>n.d.</td><td>n.d.</td><td>OsHAK1, OsAKT1</td><td>9, 11</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Na<sup>+</sup></td><td>High-affinity</td><td>60 or 477-655<sup>¶</sup></td><td>(-) K<sup>+</sup>, Ba<sup>+2</sup></td><td>OsHKT2;1</td><td>12, 13, 14</td></tr><tr><td>Low-affinity</td><td>n.d.</td><td>(=) K<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>+2</sup></td><td>OsHKT2;1</td><td>13, 15</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote>†High-affinity uptake takes into account cation uptake observed at external concentrations <0.5mM while the low-affinity one does so at ≥0.5mM. *Obtained with Rb⁺ as an analogue for K⁺. (+), (-) and (=) stand for activation, inhibition or no effect on cation uptake, respectively. n.d. not determined. †Only one component was identified in Horie et al. 2007 for external Na⁺ concentrations up to 5mM.</footnote>

<footnote>References: ¹Gierth et al. 2005; ²Rubio et al. 2008; ³Coskun et al. 2013; ⁴Spalding et al. 1999; ⁵Caballero et al. 2012; ⁶Essah et al. 2003;</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Maathuis and Sanders, 2001; ⁸Bañuelos et al. 2002; ⁹Chen et al. 2015; ¹⁰Yang et al. 2014; ¹¹Li et al. 2015; ¹²Garciadeblas et al. 2003;</footnote>

<footnote n="13">¹³Horie et al. 2007; ¹⁴Haro et al. 2010; ¹⁵Malagoli et al. 2008</footnote>
1142

1143 **Figure legends**

1144

1145 **Figure 1.- Schematic comparison of the systems involved in K⁺ and Na⁺ movements in Arabidopsis and rice roots.** The availability of knock-out mutants in Arabidopsis and rice plants for specific transport systems has allowed for elucidating their roles in K⁺ transport. The figure shows the predicted function of each system for which knock-out mutants have been studied. AtHAK5 and AKT1 are the main systems for K⁺ uptake in Arabidopsis plants. In addition, a member of the KT/HAK/KUP family, AtKUP7, seems to also be involved in K⁺ uptake. K⁺ release into the xylem is mainly mediated by SKOR and also partially by AtKUP7. In rice, AtHAK5 and AKT1 functions are fulfilled by the rice homologs OsHAK1 and OsAKT1. An additional system, OsHAK5, partially contributes to high-affinity K⁺ uptake, but at higher concentrations than OsHAK1. These three rice systems may directly or indirectly facilitate K⁺ release into the xylem, with the contribution by OsHAK5 to K⁺ release into the xylem being more relevant. It is not clear if such contribution is a direct (by mediating K⁺ efflux into xylem vessels) or indirect (by favoring K⁺ accumulation in endodermal cells) outcome of the aforementioned transporters. Regarding Na⁺ uptake, the genetic identity of Na⁺ uptake systems in Arabidopsis remains to be elucidated. GLRs, CNGCs or other non-selective cation channels could be involved. In rice, OsHKT2;1 has been shown to mediate Na⁺ uptake during K⁺ deficiency. In the presence of K⁺ or high external Na⁺ concentrations other unknown systems should take part in Na⁺ uptake.

1164

1165 **Figure 2.- Main pathways for root K⁺ uptake and their regulatory mechanisms.**
1166 HAK5-type transporters are high-affinity K⁺ transporters involved in K⁺ uptake at very low concentrations. When the external K⁺ concentration increases, the inward-rectifier K⁺ channel AKT1 together with HAK5, contributes to K⁺ uptake. At K⁺ concentrations above 200 µM, HAK5 is not present and AKT1 is the main system for low-affinity K⁺ uptake. At very high concentrations, other unknown systems can secure K⁺ supply if AKT1 is not functional. The HAK5 and AKT1 uptake systems are subjected to finely-tuned regulation. At low K⁺ concentrations, a hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane induces *HAK5* transcription. The signal cascade of HAK5 regulation is dependent on ethylene and ROS production. In addition, low external K⁺ likely produces a specific cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ signal that is registered by the Ca²⁺ sensor CBL1, which induces CIPK23 recruitment to the plasma membrane resulting in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of HAK5 and AKT1. The channel activity is downregulated through dephosphorylation by the AIP1 phosphatase, and interaction with CBL10 and vitamin B6. Other subunits such as KC1 and the SNARE protein SYP121 also cooperate in AKT1 regulation. It can be concluded that whereas HAK5 is subjected to transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation, K⁺ uptake through AKT1 is mainly regulated post-transcriptionally. The CIPK23/CBL1 complex emerges as a key regulator of K⁺ nutrition.

1184
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>Figure 01.TIF</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Figure 02.TIF</figcaption></figure>