# Morphology, chemical composition and origin of 2:1 phyllosilicates in Bw horizons of latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau: contribution to the discussion of the microgranular structure origin

Ary Bruand, Adriana Reatto

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Ary Bruand, Adriana Reatto. Morphology, chemical composition and origin of 2:1 phyllosilicates in Bw horizons of latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau: contribution to the discussion of the microgranular structure origin. Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, 2022, 354 (G2), pp.159-185. 10.5802/crgeos.123. insu-03714343

HAL Id: insu-03714343

https://insu.hal.science/insu-03714343

Submitted on 5 Jul 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Comptes Rendus
## Géoscience
### Sciences de la Planète

Ary Bruand and Adriana Reatto

Morphology, chemical composition and origin of 2:1 phyllosilicates in Bw horizons of latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau: contribution to the discussion of the microgranular structure origin

Volume 354 (2022), p. 159-185

<https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.123>

© Académie des sciences, Paris and the authors, 2022.

Some rights reserved.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

This article is licensed under the
CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Original Article — Petrology, Geochemistry

# Morphology, chemical composition and origin of 2:1 phyllosilicates in Bw horizons of latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau: contribution to the discussion of the microgranular structure origin

Ary Bruand<sup>a, *</sup> and Adriana Reatto<sup>b</sup>

<sup>a</sup> Institut des Sciences de la Terre d'Orléans (ISTO) UMR7327, Université d'Orléans - CNRS - BRGM, Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers en région Centre (OSUC), Campus Géosciences, Université d'Orléans, 1A rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans, Cedex 2, France

<sup>b</sup> Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa), Secretaria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Parque Estação Biológica-PqEB s/n<sup>0</sup>, Brasília-DF, Brazil

E-mails: Ary.Bruand@univ-orleans.fr (A. Bruand), adriana.reatto@embrapa.br (A. Reatto)

**Abstract.** Polished sections of two Bw horizons collected in latosols located on the South American Surface (LSAS) and the Velhas Surface (LVS) in the Brazilian Central Plateau were studied using backscattered scanning images (BESI) in scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). BESI showed areas with a strong microgranular structure associated with areas having a weak to moderate microgranular structure. BESI at high magnification also showed the presence of elongated particles 1 to 30 µm long and 0.2 to 5 µm wide, most of them exhibiting an internal layer organization of 2:1 phyllosilicate particles. Chemical composition determined using EDS showed that the core of the largest particles was consistent with the chemical composition of poorly weathered muscovite with a small proportion of Al in the interlayer space as hydroxy-Al. Results also showed that when the K₂O content decreased, indicative of a stronger weathering of the primary minerals such as muscovite, the chemical analysis showed that the proportion of hydroxy-Al in the interlayer increased. From our results, it can be assumed that these particles correspond to weathered micas and hydroxy-Al interlayered vermiculites (HIVs) recognized earlier in the literature. They are interpreted as having been brought in the Bw horizons by the burrowing activity of termites and originating from deep horizons of the latosols studied or from the saprolite in which the latosol has developed. This explains their presence associated with minerals resulting from intense weathering of the mineral present in the parent material. In line with this interpretation, the strong microgranular structure of the Bw horizons results from fragmentation and transport activity while the weak to moderate microgranular structure corresponds to old portions of channels and cavity walls. Finally, our results show that some latosols should be considered as a biomantle in which the physical properties related to the microstructure

<footnote>* Corresponding author.</footnote>
development and chemical properties related to the presence of poorly to intensely weathered muscovites and of HIVs result from faunal activity.

**Keywords.** Ferralsol, Termite, Muscovite, HIV, Potassium, BESI, EDS.

Manuscript received 3rd January 2022, revised 23rd February 2022 and 18th March 2022, accepted 21st March 2022.

# 1. Introduction

In Brazil, latosols occupy an area of about 2,835,000 km² which corresponds to one third of the Brazilian territory [Ker, 1997, Silva et al., 2005]. They are characterized by minor differentiation of their horizons, low-activity clay (i.e. dominated by 1:1 clay minerals), a weak macrostructure, and a strong submillimetric granular structure [Embrapa, 2006]. These soils correspond to the end of a geochemical sequence of weathering [Melfi and Pédro, 1977, 1978, Pédro, 1968]. The latosols in the Brazilian taxonomy [Embrapa, 2006] correspond mainly to oxisols and to ultisols in the Soil Taxonomy [Soil Survey Staff, 2006]. They correspond to ferralsols in the World Reference Base [IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015]. Latosols are defined in Brazilian taxonomy by the presence of a diagnostic Bw horizon between the surface and 200 cm depth [Embrapa, 2006]. The main geochemical process occurring in latosols is intense hydrolysis with almost total removal of alkaline and alkaline-earth cations and very high silica removal resulting in the formation of 1:1 clay minerals. This hydrolysis causes a release of the cations that are leached to form 1:1 clay minerals in mixture with iron and aluminum oxi-hydroxide [Melfi and Pédro, 1977, 1978]. As a consequence, the clay fraction of the Bw horizon is characterized by the presence of kaolinite, gibbsite, goethite and hematite in varying proportions depending on the parent material and landscape position [Curi and Franzmeier, 1984, Macedo and Bryant, 1987, Ker, 1997, Reatto et al., 2000, 2008, 2010, Schaefer et al., 2008].

However, according to the Brazilian taxonomy [Embrapa, 2006], although latosols are thick to very thick soils resulting from intense weathering of minerals present in parent materials, muscovite can be found in small amounts in the coarse fraction of the Bw horizon, whereas silt and clay fractions may contain very small amounts of 2:1 clay minerals such as illite and smectite as shown in many studies using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Since the 1970s, Lepsch and Buol [1974] studied soils located in the São Paulo state developed on basic extrusive rocks and showed

the presence of chlorite/vermiculite intergrade minerals in the coarse clay fraction of the Bw horizon of a latosol. Later, Antonello [1988] recorded hydroxy-Al interlayered vermiculites (HIVs) in latosols developed on a large range of parent materials in different regions of Brazil but did not consider their origin. Ker and Resende [1990] also found HIVs in latosols developed on basalt in Southern Brazil and recorded an inverse relationship between HIV and gibbsite content. Ker [1995] found HIVs in latosols developed on limestone and amphibolite and assumed that they resulted from the transformation of mica or chlorite present in the parent material. Rodrigues Netto [1996] found HIVs in latosols developed on several parent materials and concluded that their presence was independent of the relative weathering intensity. Furian et al. [2002] analyzed the distribution of kaolinite-gibbsite horizon soils located in southeastern Brazil and developed on weathered Precambrian granite-gneiss rocks. They found traces of Al-vermiculites in the studied horizons using XRD. Melo et al. [2004] observed the presence of mica and feldspar minerals in the silt fraction of the Bw horizon of latosols developed on a weathered basalt as well as the presence of 2:1 clay minerals with hydroxy interlayer material. Soares et al. [2005] studied the mineralogy and ion exchange properties of the particle size fractions of Brazilian soils, some of which were latosols. They found mica and feldspars in the sand, silt and clay fractions in some of the latosols studied, but their respective proportions were not determined. Maquere et al. [2008] studied the dynamics of mineral elements under eucalyptus plantations in latosols developed on cretaceous sandstones and analyzed the contribution of HIVs to the cation exchange capacity of the soil and to the production of mineral elements to the soil solution by their weathering. In their review of the mineralogy of the clay fraction of latosols, Schaefer et al. [2008] focused on low-activity clay minerals and iron and aluminum oxyhydroxides, and mentioned the presence of significant amounts of HIVs in some latosols developed on basalts in southern Brazil. Pereira et al. [2010] studied the mineralogy of
latosols developed on weathered pelitic rocks and recorded small amounts of illite and HIVs in the Bw horizons using XRD as earlier shown by Brito Galvão and Schulze [1996] in similar latosols of the Minas Gerais. Reatto et al. [2010] studied the Bw horizons of ten latosols developed on different parent materials along a 350 km long regional toposequence across the Central Plateau. They found HIVs in the clay fraction of six of them. Traces of HIVs were again found very recently, associated to traces of illite, by Almeida et al. [2021] in latosols located in the Minas Gerais state. Marques et al. [2011] studied the mineralogy of the clay fraction of latosols developed on a large range of parent materials using XRD and HIVs were only found in the clay fraction of latosols developed on basalts but their origin was not discussed. Bertolazi et al. [2017] identified 2:1 clay minerals in the top 40 cm of latosols that appeared to be vermiculite or HIVs. Pacheco et al. [2018] studied the mineralogy, micromorphology and genesis of soils developed on weathered precambrian migmatized paragneiss and found traces of vermiculite and HIVs in the soils studied, two of which were latosols. As part of their study of the soil properties governing phosphorous adsorption in soils of Southern Brazil, Oliviera et al. [2020] found small amounts of 2:1 clay minerals by using XRD. They were present in the twenty latosols studied.

Few authors identified 2:1 phyllosilicates in latosols using other methods than XRD alone. Caner et al. [2014] studied soil clay formation in a Ferralsol developed on a weathered basalt in southern Brazil combining XRD, chemical extraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and determined the presence of hydroxy-Al-interlayered minerals originating from aluminization of smectite present in the saprolite under acidic conditions. Brito Galvão and Schulze [1996] studied the mineralogy of the silt and clay fraction of latosols developed on limestone and siltstone rocks by combining differential X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray analysis. They showed the presence of K in addition to Si, Al and Fe in platy and angular individual particles of the 1–5 µm fraction which corresponded to dioctahedral mica particles identified on the X-ray diffraction patterns. They also showed traces of dioctahedral micas and HIVs in the <5 µm fraction throughout the 2 m of the profile that appeared to result from

mica weathering. Costa et al. [2004] applied both XRD and thermal analysis to the <2 µm fraction of a large range of Brazilian soils and determined the presence of small amounts of 2:1 clay minerals in latosols developed on magmatic rocks and estimated their mean content in the <2 µm fraction at 78.0 g·kg⁻¹ and the mean content of gibbsite, kaolinite and Fe₂O₃ at 130.9, 605.5 and 185.5 g·kg⁻¹, respectively.

While the presence of micas and 2:1 clay minerals has been frequently recorded in latosols developed on a wide range of parent materials, their particle morphology, chemical composition and origin remain unclear. On the basis of the studies carried out which were essentially based on X-ray diffraction analysis, these minerals are, according to the authors, (i) either neoformed within the Bw horizons of latosols, HIVs resulting from the direct formation of 2:1 clay minerals with interlayer Al from the soil solution rich in Al [e.g. Bertolazi et al., 2017, Bertoluzzi et al., 2008, Karathanasis et al., 1983, Volkoff and Melfi, 1980], (ii) or related to bioturbation produced by termites and ants which take material from the saprolite and bring it up to the Bw horizons of latosols [Freitas et al., 2021, Schaefer, 2001]. In this context, the objective of the present study was (i) to describe the microstructure of selected Bw horizons of latosols by using backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) of polished sections, (ii) to identify 2:1 minerals in the BESI of the groundmass at high magnification, (iii) to describe their morphology, (iv) and to analyze their chemical composition using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). These data will enable discussion of the characteristics and origin of the 2:1 clay minerals in the Bw horizons of the latosols studied, and of the origin of their submillimetric granular structure.

## 2. Materials and methods

### 2.1. *The soils*

The latosols studied are located in the Brazilian Central Plateau which covers about 10% of the continuous Cerrados Biome [Silva et al., 2005]. The Central Plateau presents two main geomorphologic surfaces: the Late Tertiary South American Surface (SAS) (900 to 1200 m high) corresponding to tablelands where gibbsitic-sesquioxidic latosols are dominant and the
Late Quaternary Velhas Surface (VS), which occurs 5 to 25 m below the SAS and shows a moderate slope, convex forms and covers smaller extensions than the SAS where kaolinitic-non-sesquioxidic latosols are numerous [King, 1956, Motta et al., 2002, Marques et al., 2004, Reatto et al., 2009]. The most representative climate of the Central Plateau is megathermic or humid tropical (Aw) with the savanna subtype [Köppen, 1931]. It is characterized by a dry winter (average temperature of the coldest month >18 °C) and maximum rains in summer. The average annual rainfall ranges from 1500 to 2000 mm, with the highest amounts of rainfall occurring in January and the lowest in June, July, and August (<50 mm per month) [Asad et al., 1993].

Two Bw horizons were selected in the latosols studied by Reatto et al. [2007, 2008, 2009, 2010] along a 350 km long regional toposequence in the Central Plateau. One Bw horizon was collected in a latosol located on the South American Surface (LSAS) and developed on a saprolite of a precambrian sandy metarithimite [Campos, 2012, Campos et al., 2013] mainly composed of quartz and kaolinite as shown using XRD [Reatto et al., 2010]. The latter study did not show the presence of micas or 2:1 clay minerals [Reatto et al., 2010]. This Bw horizon corresponds to the horizon Bw₂ (115/120–200+ cm) of the gibbsitic-sesquioxidic latosol L2 studied by Reatto et al. [2007, 2008] (Table 1). Cavities related to termite activity were moderately present (Table 1). Mineralogical study of the <2 µm fraction using XRD did not show the presence of HIVs [Reatto et al., 2010]. The other Bw horizon was collected in a latosol located on the Velhas Surface (LVS) and developed on a saprolite of a Precambrian clayey metarithimite [Campos, 2012, Campos et al., 2013] where muscovite was present as shown by XRD [Reatto et al., 2010]. It corresponds to the horizon Bw₁ (57/90–90/120 cm) of the kaolinitic-non-sesquioxidic latosol L5 studied by Reatto et al. [2007, 2008] (Table 1). Cavities related to termite activity were moderately present (Table 1). Mineralogical study of the <2 µm fraction using XRD showed the presence of HIVs [Reatto et al., 2010]. The two Bw horizons collected show a weak macrostructure and a strong submillimetric granular structure (Table 1). LSAS and LVS are highly clayey (clay content of 610 and 550 g·kg⁻¹, respectively) and exhibit a low bulk density (0.90 and 1.03, respectively) (Table 2). The cation exchange capacity

is higher in LSAS (10.60 cmol(+).kg⁻¹) than in LVS (3.19 cmol(+).kg⁻¹) with most exchangeable cations corresponding to H⁺ and Al³⁺ cations (Table 2).

## 2.2. Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy

Both polished and carbon coated sections were prepared using a polyester resin according to Bruand et al. [1996] using undisturbed samples collected in the LSAS and LVS with 100 cm³ volume cylinders.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to describe the structure of LSAS and LVS using backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) at low magnifications ranging from ×35 to ×200 and high magnification ranging from ×1000 to ×8000 to identify particles of phyllosilicates and then to explore their chemical composition as well as that of the surrounding groundmass. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) used was a Merlin Compact Zeiss microscope equipped with a Gemini I column including a backscattered electron detector (BSD) with five quadrants for backscattered electron scanning images (BESI). The assembly of BESI recorded at low magnification makes it possible to have a mosaic image made of 50 images for LSAS and 46 images for LVS formed from the first micrometers of the sample, thus allowing the structure to be observed on large areas as done earlier by Reatto et al. [2009] in optical microscopy.

Chemical analyses of the particles of phyllosilicates identified on the BESI were performed using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with a Quantax XFlash6 Bruker detector enabling a resolution of 129 eV. Observations and analyses were performed at 15 kV accelerating voltage and at a working distance of 10 mm. The SEM operated with a resolution of 0.8 nm at 15 kV acceleration voltage. A probe current of 1.6 nA and 100 s count time were used. Total chemical composition was expressed on the basis that the sum of oxide mass equals 100 for determinations of SiO₂, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, MgO, CaO, K₂O, and Na₂O and TiO₂. They were also projected in ternary plots to show the Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO contents. The acquisition time of EDS analyses was 100 s per zone analyzed.
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Field morphological descriptions of the latosols studied [modified after Reatto et al., 2007, 2008]</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Latosol Horizon</th><th rowspan="2">Depth, Cm</th><th colspan="2">Matrix Munsell color</th><th rowspan="2">Compound structure</th><th rowspan="2">DIRV</th><th colspan="2">Biological macrovoids</th></tr><tr><th>Dry</th><th>Wet</th><th>Channels roots</th><th>Channels and cavities related to termites</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="8" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">Red latosol<sup>(1)</sup>–Typic Acrustox<sup>(2)</sup>–Orthic Ferralsol<sup>(3)</sup> /elevation: 1200 m (S 15° 37'127"; W 47° 45'576")</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">LSAS</td><td>A</td><td>0–15</td><td>7.5YR 3/4</td><td>5YR 3/3</td><td>(1)3cSBK; (5)3fGR</td><td>(–)fD</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>AB</td><td>15–35/40</td><td>7.5YR 5/6</td><td>5YR 4/4</td><td>(1)3cSBK; (4)3m-1SBK; (4)3fGR</td><td>(+ + +)vcLC</td><td>No</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>BA</td><td>35/40–60/80</td><td>5YR 5/8</td><td>2.5 YR 4/6</td><td>(1)2c-mSBK; (2)2fSBK; (5)2f-vfGR</td><td>(+ + +)vcD; (+ +)mLC</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td>Bw<sub>1</sub></td><td>60/80–115/120</td><td>5YR 5/6</td><td>2.5 YR 4/8</td><td>(1)1cSBK; (3)1SBK; (4)2-3f-vfGR</td><td>(+)fD</td><td>No</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td>Bw<sub>2</sub></td><td>115/120–200+</td><td>5YR 5/6</td><td>2.5 YR 4/8</td><td>(1)1cSBK; (5)3f-vfGR</td><td>(–)fD</td><td>No</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">Red latosol<sup>(1)</sup>–Typic Acrustox<sup>(2)</sup>–Orthic Ferralsol<sup>(3)</sup> /elevation: 920 m (S 15° 36'502"; W 47° 42'813")</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">LVS</td><td>A</td><td>0–11/20</td><td>5YR 5/6</td><td>5YR 5/7</td><td>(1)3cSBK; (4)3f-mSBK; (2)3fSBK; (3)3f-vfGR</td><td>(+ + +)fLC</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>AB</td><td>11/20–35/40</td><td>7.5 YR 4/6</td><td>5YR 4/6</td><td>(1)2c-mSBK; (4)3fSBK; (4)2-3fGR</td><td>(+ + +)fD</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>BA</td><td>35/40–57/90</td><td>5YR 4/6</td><td>2.5YR 2.5/4</td><td>(2)2mSBK; (3)3fSBK; (4)3-2fGR</td><td>(+ + +)fD; (+ +)c-mLC</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td>Bw<sub>1</sub></td><td>57/90–90/120</td><td>5YR 5/8</td><td>2.5YR 3/6</td><td>(2)2mSBK; (1)3-2fSBK; (5)3-2fGR</td><td>(+)fD</td><td>(+)CH</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td>Bw<sub>2</sub></td><td>90/120–170</td><td>5YR 5/8</td><td>2.5YR 4/8</td><td>(2)2fSBK; (5)3f-vfGR</td><td>(–)fD</td><td>No</td><td>(+)CV</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">Red latosol<sup>(1)</sup>–Typic Acrustox<sup>(2)</sup>–Orthic Ferralsol<sup>(3)</sup> /elevation: 920 m (S 15° 36'502"; W 47° 42'813")</td></tr><tr><td colspan="8" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">LSAS = Latosol located on the South American Surface; LVS = Latosol located on the Velhas Surface.</td></tr></tbody></table>

Structure description: (frequency-grade–size–type).

Frequency: (0) rarely: <1% of volume; (1) very little: 1 to 5% of volume; (2) little: 5 to 15% of volume; (3) common: 15 to 40% of volume; frequent (4): 40 to 80% of volume; dominant (5): >80% of volume. Grade: 1—weak; 2—moderate; 3—strong. Size of granular structure: vf—very-fine (<1-mm); f = fine (1 to 2-mm); m = medium (2 to 5-mm); c = coarse (5 to 10-mm); vc = very-coarse (>10-mm). Size of subangular blocky: vf—very-fine (<5-mm); f = fine (5 to 10-mm); m = medium (10 to 20-mm); c = coarse (20 to 50-mm); vc = very-coarse (>50-mm). Type: GR = granular; SBK = subangular blocky.

DIRV (Dense Irregular sub-Rounded Volumes) description: (frequency/grade–size–type). Frequency/grade: (+ + +) = very strong; (+ +) = strong; (+ + +) = moderate; (+) = weak; (–) = very weak; no = not observed. Size of DIRV described as subangular blocky structure. Type: D = dispersed DIRV; LC = locally concentrated DIRV.

Biological Activity description: (frequency/grade–size–type). Frequency/grade and size of biological activity described as DIRV. Type: CH = channels; CV = cavities.

Soil Type: (1) Brazilian Soil Taxonomy [Embrapa, 1999], (2) Soil Taxonomy [Soil Survey Staff, 2006], (3) World Reference Base [IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015].
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Physical and chemical characteristics of the two horizons LA1 and LA2 studied [modified after Reatto et al., 2007, 2008]</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">Horizon</th><th colspan="2">Particle size distribution</th><th rowspan="2">Db</th><th rowspan="2">Dp</th><th rowspan="2">pH<sub>tu</sub></th><th rowspan="2">pH<sub>KCl</sub></th><th rowspan="2">OC</th><th colspan="4">Exchangeable cations</th><th colspan="2">CEC</th><th colspan="2">Oxyde content</th></tr><tr><th>&lt;2 µm (g·kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>2-50 µm (g·kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>50-2000 µm (g·kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Na<sup>+</sup></th><th>Al<sup>3+</sup></th><th>H<sup>+</sup> + Al<sup>3+</sup></th><th>(cmol<sup>(+)</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>LSAS</td><td>Bw<sub>2</sub></td><td>610</td><td>140</td><td>250</td><td>0.90</td><td>2.76</td><td>5.30</td><td>6.20</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>10.44</td><td>10.60</td><td>187</td><td>565</td><td>225</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>LYS</td><td>Bw<sub>1</sub></td><td>550</td><td>150</td><td>300</td><td>1.03</td><td>2.76</td><td>4.80</td><td>4.00</td><td>0.62</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.29</td><td>2.92</td><td>3.19</td><td>339</td><td>442</td><td>206</td><td>13</td></tr></tbody></table>

LSAS = Latosol located on the South American Surface; LVS = Latosol located on the Velhas Surface; Db = bulk density; Dp = particle density; OC = Organic carbon; CEC = Cation exchange capacity; SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> contents were determined by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> dissolution.
# 3. Results and discussion

## 3.1. *Development of the microgranular structure*

Observation of the structure at different magnifications enabled to identify two types of structure. Areas with a strong microgranular structure with highly to moderately separated microaggregates (zone 1, Figures 1 and 2) and areas with a moderate to weak microgranular structure with coalesced microaggregates (zone 2, Figures 1 and 2) were observed in the polished sections of LSAS and LVS. The areas with a strong microgranular structure with highly separated microaggregates correspond to the strong fine to very fine granular structure described in the field (Table 1), while the areas exhibiting a microgranular structure with coalesced microaggregates correspond to a moderate to weak microgranular structure. The latter area corresponds to the dense irregular sub-rounded volumes (DIRV) described in the field as medium (10 to 20 mm) to coarse (20 to 50 mm) subangular blocky structures without any visible difference in composition with the surrounding microaggregated material (Table 1).

Similar areas with coalesced microaggregates associated with areas having a strong microgranular structure with highly to moderately separated microaggregates were earlier described by Gomes et al. [2004] on thin sections of Bw horizons of clayey latosols located on the South American and Velhas geomorphic surfaces in the Cerrado Biome. They were again described very recently by Pessoa et al. [2022] in latosols presenting different degrees of microgranular structure development as shown on the thin sections studied and the proportion of aggregates 8–16 mm in diameter measured in the Bw horizons.

Volumes of soils with similar characteristics to those of the DIRV identified in the field (Table 1) were also very early described in microaggregated soils similar to latosols in Africa and described as “hard compact lumps” [Webster, 1965] which “disintegrate readily under light finger pressure” [Trappell and Webster, 1986] into much smaller aggregates. The proportion of the two types of microstructure was shown by Volland-Tuduri et al. [2005] to be closely related to bulk density in the clayey latosols studied earlier by Balbino et al. [2002, 2004]. The smaller bulk density ($D_b$) recorded in LSAS (0.90)

compared to LVS (1.03) indicates a stronger microgranular structure in LSAS but may also be partly related to the higher clay content recorded in LSAS (Table 2). However, Reatto et al. [2009], using mercury porosimetry, recorded a higher pore volume resulting from the packing of the microaggregates in LSAS (0.536 $cm^3.g^{-1}$) than in LVS (0.453 $cm^3.g^{-1}$), which is consistent with a stronger microgranular structure and smaller $D_b$ in LSAS than in LVS.

## 3.2. *Origin of the microgranular structure*

Although the microgranular structure has long been recognized in latosols, no consensus has yet been reached to explain its origin [Marcelino et al., 2018]. Two main origins have been proposed: either that it results mainly (i) from physico-chemical processes combining mechanical fragmentation of a compact soil material due to alternating wetting and drying in relation to change in physico-chemical interactions between kaolinite and iron oxyhydroxides [e.g. Cooper et al., 2005, Karathanasis et al., 1983, Melfi and Pédro, 1977, 1978, Volkoff and Melfi, 1980], or (ii) from bioturbation processes related to long term soil faunal activity, particularly termite activity [e.g. Jouquet et al., 2016, Marcelino et al., 2018, Reatto et al., 2009, Schaefer, 2001].

Among the data supporting a biological origin for the microgranular structure there are the numerous microscopy observations showing that many microaggregates of latosols are similar in size, shape and internal structure to the pellets produced by termites to build their nests and mounds [Cosarinsky et al., 2005, Eschenbrenner, 1986, Jungerius et al., 1999]. The respective distribution of the two types of microstructure as shown in Figure 1a is consistent with a microstructure development in the horizons resulting from faunal activity, as earlier discussed by several authors for latosols [e.g. Cooper et al., 2005, Reatto et al., 2009, Schaefer, 2001, Stoops, 1983]. According to Reatto et al. [2009], the moderate to weak microgranular structure with coalesced microaggregates corresponds to portions of channel or cavity walls similar to those described early by Eschenbrenner [1986]. Moreover, according to Stoops [1983], Schaefer [2001], Cooper et al. [2005] and Reatto et al. [2009], the strong microgranular structure originates from an infilling activity with microaggregates resulting from fragmentation and the burrowing action of
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Figure 1.** Observations of backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) of polished sections of LSAS (a) and LVS (b) showing areas with a strong microgranular structure (1) and with a moderate to weak microgranular structure (2).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Figure 2.** Strong microgranular structure in LSAS (a) and LVS (b) and moderate to weak microgranular structure in LSAS (c) and LVS (d) observed on backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) of polished sections.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Elongated large particles observed on the BESI of the cross section of LSAS and location of the analysis performed by using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the elongated particles selected. The numbers correspond to the analysis numbers in Table 3.</figcaption></figure>

termites and possibly also of ants. Holt and Lepage [2000] discussed soil bioturbation by termites during mound-building, and the construction of cavities and galleries and suggested that the soil properties of latosols result from soil translocation and soil turnover. Along the same lines, Schaefer [2001] proposed that the microgranular structure of latosols results from long-term termite activity.

### 3.3. *Morphology of the phyllosilicate particles*

Particles exhibiting the morphological characteristics of phyllosilicates were observed on cross-

sections from the LSAS and LVS (Figures 3–6). They were 1 to 30 µm long and 0.2 to 5 µm wide, most showing an internal layer organization with some large internal inter-layer spaces (Figures 3a–d and 5a,b). The latter resulted from swelling properties according to the chemical composition of the 2:1 layers, the collapse of most inter-layer spaces to the benefit of the opening of some inter-layer spaces explaining the large internal inter-layer spaces (Figures 3a–d and 5a,b). The size of these phyllosilicate particles identified on the BESI is consistent with what was found in earlier studies which showed their presence in the coarse clay fraction [Lepsch
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Elongated small particles observed on the BESI of the cross section of LSAS and location of the analysis performed by using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the elongated particles selected. The numbers correspond to the analysis numbers in Table 4.</figcaption></figure>

and Buol, 1974], the silt fraction [Melo et al., 2004, Marques et al., 2011] or both the coarse clay and silt fractions [Brito Galvão and Schulze, 1996, Soares et al., 2005]. These particles appeared mostly isolated in the groundmass of LSAS (Figures 3, 4) whereas in the groundmass of LVS they associated large elongated particles with numerous much smaller elongated particles (Figures 5, 6). Whatever their size, they appeared to be much more numerous in LVS than in LSAS. They were identified within the two types of microstructure of LSAS and LVS without any particular location regarding the development of the microgranular structure. Some particles

showed weathering features such as a strong opening of some interlayer spaces (Figures 3a–c and 5a,b) or exfoliation at the extremities of the particles (Figure 3b,c).

### 3.4. *Chemical composition of phyllosilicate particles recognized on BESI*

Chemical analyses of the largest elongated particles (Figures 3, 5), i.e. particles ranging from 3 to 30 µm in length and from 0.5 to 5 µm in width, showed that the Al₂O₃ content ranged from 33.69 to 46.61%, SiO₂ content from 42.42 to 50.43%, Fe₂O₃ content from
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Elongated large particles observed on the BESI of the cross section of LVS and location of the analysis performed by using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the elongated particles selected. The numbers correspond to the analysis numbers in Table 5.</figcaption></figure>

1.24 to 11.22%, MgO content from 0.30 to 1.44% and K₂O content from 1.28 to 10.38% (Tables 3 and 5). On the other hand, chemical analysis of the smallest elongated particles, i.e. particles ranging from 1 to 3 µm in length and from 0.2 to 0.5 µm in width, showed either the presence of smaller amounts of K₂O than in the largest elongated particles with K₂O ranging from 1.27 to 4.14% or a K₂O content close to its value in the surrounding groundmass (Tables 4 and 6). Because of the small size of the latter particles, we can assume that their chemical analysis does not correspond to the particle body alone but also takes into account part of the surrounding groundmass

material, thus limiting the discussion of the results in terms of chemical composition of the corresponding elongated particles. However, the most likely hypothesis is that these elongated particles with a K₂O content close to that of the groundmass are 2:1 phyllosilicates such as HIVs with a very low K₂O content or kaolinite particles.

Comparison of the Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO contents recorded for the largest elongated particles with their respective contents in a theoretical muscovite and in unweathered and highly weathered muscovites showed that some of the chemical compositions recorded are close to those of the
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Elongated large particles observed on the BESI of the cross section of LVS and location of the analysis performed by using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in the elongated particles selected. The numbers correspond to the analysis numbers in Table 6.</figcaption></figure>

theoretical and unweathered muscovite (Figure 7). A structural formula based on the structure of 2:1 phyllosilicates was established for chemical analysis conducted on some large elongated particles and exhibiting the highest K₂O content among the analyses performed for the selected particles (Table 7). The structural formula recorded showed a small excess of cavities occupied in the octahedral sheet, the number of occupied cavities ranging from 2.02 to 2.09 for the half unit cell (Table 7). The structural formulas recorded correspond to 2:1 phyllosilicates between muscovite and dioctahedral vermiculites, the latter corresponding to dioctahedral 2:1

phyllosilicates with 0.3 to 0.7 Si⁴⁺ substituted by Al³⁺ in the tetrahedral sheet [Velde and Meunier, 2008]. When the K₂O content decreased, the structural formulas calculated showed an increase in the excess of Al³⁺ in the octahedral sheet, thus indicating that the lower the K₂O content, the higher the amount of aluminum in the interlayer space [Meunier, 2007].

Globally, when the K₂O content decreased, chemical analysis showed that the Al₂O₃ content remained greater than in the weathered muscovite selected in the literature [Aurousseau et al., 1983] and increased with the decrease in the K₂O content (Figure 7). This can be considered to result from the intercalation of
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Respective content in Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO: (a) in the large elongated particles (light blue points, see Table 3) and surrounding groundmass (red points, see Table 3) of LSAS; (b) in the large elongated particles (light blue points, see Table 5) and surrounding groundmass (red points, see Table 5) of LVS. Theoretical composition of muscovite (deep blue point) [Velde and Meunier, 2008], composition of muscovite particles (brown points) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] and of weathered muscovite particles (yellow points) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] are also plotted.</figcaption></figure>

hydroxy-Al of the interlayer space during the weathering processes of the muscovite particles. When we look at the chemical composition variation within large elongated particles showing exfoliation morphologies at their extremities, we find that the K₂O content is smaller in these extremities compared to those recorded in the heart of the elongated particles (Figure 7). While we cannot exclude the formation of some kaolinite as resulting from the weathering of muscovite, the small variation of the Fe₂O₃ and MgO content in the largest elongated particles whatever their K₂O content is consistent with the formation of HIVs during the weathering process (Figure 7).

Using the same type of diagram as for large elongated particles (Figure 7), results showed Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO contents for small elongated particles (Figure 8) that are consistent with those of HIVs. Again, while we cannot exclude the formation of some kaolinite as resulting from the weathering of muscovite, the Fe₂O₃, MgO and K₂O content is again consistent with the formation of HIVs resulting from intense weathering of muscovite particles resulting in the aluminization of the interlayer space as shown earlier [Aurousseau et al., 1983, Caner et al., 2014] (Tables 4 and 6). The weathering of muscovite particles and related chemical composition evolution are shown in Figure 9 with analyses selected in large elongated particles. Results show a continuous

decrease in SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO content and an increase in Al₂O₃ content from the core of the large elongated particles selected to their exfoliated extremities (Tables 3 and 5; Figures 3 and 5).

Using X-ray diffraction, Reatto et al. [2010] showed the presence of HIVs in the clay-size fraction of LVS. They correspond either to the small 2:1 phyllosilicate particles shown on the BESI that exhibit a chemical composition consistent with intensely weathered muscovite or to HIVs with a hydroxy-Al content in the interlayer space which increases with the decrease in the K₂O content (Table 6, Figure 6). On the other hand, Reatto et al. [2010] did not determine the presence of HIVs in LSAS, whereas in the present study, large and small elongated particles were identified with similar characteristics to those present in LVS. This can be explained by the much smaller number of elongated particles recorded in LSAS than in LVS as shown on BESI, and in particular by the fact that areas with large elongated particles associated to a high concentration of small particles were common in LVS while they were not observed in LSAS (Figures 3, 6). Whatever their respective amount in LSAS and LVS, BESI showed that the surface area proportion corresponding to the elongated particles is smaller than 1% in the two Bw horizons studied. Thus, although present in LSAS, weathered muscovites and HIVs are not present in
<table><caption>**Table 3.** Chemical analysis of the particles shown in the backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) and of their surrounding groundmass (Figure 3) using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3a and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>36.81</td><td>47.00</td><td>5.05</td><td>0.94</td><td>0.00</td><td>8.93</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>35.13</td><td>50.00</td><td>3.05</td><td>1.28</td><td>0.01</td><td>9.58</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>34.99</td><td>49.66</td><td>3.18</td><td>1.03</td><td>0.03</td><td>10.01</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>35.18</td><td>49.29</td><td>3.50</td><td>1.00</td><td>0.07</td><td>9.87</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.67</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>36.73</td><td>49.22</td><td>3.96</td><td>1.20</td><td>0.00</td><td>7.92</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>35.15</td><td>48.74</td><td>3.75</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.04</td><td>10.38</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.49</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>46.75</td><td>47.62</td><td>5.02</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.53</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>50.11</td><td>28.26</td><td>19.84</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.67</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>53.85</td><td>26.87</td><td>17.37</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.82</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>52.89</td><td>24.94</td><td>20.22</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.08</td><td>1.77</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>52.57</td><td>22.72</td><td>22.95</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.01</td><td>1.73</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3b and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>38.29</td><td>45.78</td><td>7.71</td><td>1.09</td><td>0.17</td><td>5.67</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.29</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>42.14</td><td>42.39</td><td>8.62</td><td>1.42</td><td>0.23</td><td>4.12</td><td>0.39</td><td>0.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>42.27</td><td>43.64</td><td>8.43</td><td>1.03</td><td>0.14</td><td>3.83</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>41.84</td><td>44.62</td><td>7.29</td><td>1.44</td><td>0.20</td><td>3.93</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>46.61</td><td>43.05</td><td>7.90</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.10</td><td>1.28</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>56.70</td><td>21.92</td><td>16.88</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.07</td><td>4.39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>58.29</td><td>22.83</td><td>17.62</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.94</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>57.59</td><td>24.04</td><td>16.76</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.01</td><td>1.44</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>60.13</td><td>21.13</td><td>17.07</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.62</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3c and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>36.80</td><td>47.45</td><td>5.16</td><td>1.52</td><td>0.03</td><td>8.31</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>35.99</td><td>48.39</td><td>4.51</td><td>1.58</td><td>0.04</td><td>8.46</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>34.89</td><td>48.51</td><td>4.85</td><td>1.46</td><td>0.01</td><td>9.41</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>36.82</td><td>48.03</td><td>4.77</td><td>1.52</td><td>0.02</td><td>7.91</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>35.72</td><td>48.59</td><td>4.95</td><td>1.55</td><td>0.14</td><td>8.47</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.59</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>39.49</td><td>45.63</td><td>5.92</td><td>1.23</td><td>0.04</td><td>7.12</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.47</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>53.11</td><td>24.51</td><td>20.33</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.03</td><td>1.88</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>56.05</td><td>23.20</td><td>19.34</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.09</td><td>1.27</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>50.53</td><td>19.89</td><td>27.59</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.93</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>55.00</td><td>23.50</td><td>19.36</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.95</td></tr></tbody></table>

(continued on next page)

sufficient amounts to be detected by X-ray diffraction, thus explaining why they were not detected by

Reatto et al. [2010] in the <2 mm-size and clay-size fractions.
<table><caption>**Table 3.** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3d and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>42.91</td><td>39.85</td><td>11.22</td><td>0.56</td><td>0.24</td><td>3.78</td><td>0.12</td><td>1.32</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>39.42</td><td>42.77</td><td>9.80</td><td>0.54</td><td>0.04</td><td>6.43</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>41.06</td><td>42.42</td><td>9.19</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.02</td><td>5.75</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.89</td><td>46.32</td><td>6.84</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.12</td><td>4.38</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.86</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>34.65</td><td>48.55</td><td>7.74</td><td>0.63</td><td>0.11</td><td>7.29</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.91</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>33.96</td><td>48.73</td><td>7.18</td><td>0.69</td><td>0.14</td><td>8.51</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>33.87</td><td>48.80</td><td>7.43</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.05</td><td>8.21</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.72</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>36.59</td><td>46.50</td><td>7.36</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.02</td><td>7.69</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.97</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>33.69</td><td>49.38</td><td>7.08</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.09</td><td>8.42</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>36.15</td><td>46.75</td><td>7.20</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.11</td><td>8.19</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>34.35</td><td>48.21</td><td>7.28</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.11</td><td>8.59</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.53</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>37.56</td><td>45.97</td><td>7.71</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.11</td><td>7.05</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>43.27</td><td>50.43</td><td>3.32</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.04</td><td>2.40</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>43.99</td><td>37.66</td><td>12.02</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.05</td><td>4.76</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>56.11</td><td>23.14</td><td>18.83</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.81</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>55.33</td><td>19.78</td><td>22.75</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>2.05</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>55.04</td><td>22.68</td><td>20.28</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.27</td><td>0.15</td><td>1.50</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>52.80</td><td>24.80</td><td>19.76</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.01</td><td>2.11</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>55.14</td><td>19.25</td><td>23.18</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.25</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>36.83</td><td>46.02</td><td>8.27</td><td>0.56</td><td>0.12</td><td>6.85</td><td>0.19</td><td>1.17</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>36.57</td><td>46.73</td><td>6.86</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.07</td><td>7.94</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.83</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>35.41</td><td>47.38</td><td>7.24</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.26</td><td>7.94</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.72</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>34.33</td><td>48.33</td><td>7.06</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.11</td><td>8.60</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>35.18</td><td>46.97</td><td>7.65</td><td>0.70</td><td>0.08</td><td>8.44</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.79</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>35.67</td><td>46.77</td><td>7.01</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.04</td><td>8.69</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td>37.48</td><td>45.31</td><td>7.67</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.03</td><td>6.91</td><td>0.18</td><td>1.70</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td>36.43</td><td>45.62</td><td>8.91</td><td>0.69</td><td>0.07</td><td>7.31</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.79</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>56.57</td><td>22.92</td><td>18.58</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.06</td><td>1.71</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>51.92</td><td>18.00</td><td>27.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.00</td><td>2.78</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>55.69</td><td>18.59</td><td>23.31</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.05</td><td>2.30</td></tr></tbody></table>

(continued on next page)

### 3.5. Origin of the particles of 2:1 phyllosilicates

According to recent studies, the biological origin for the microgranular structure appears to be the most likely explanation [Freitas et al., 2021, Jouquet et al., 2016, Mujinya et al., 2013, Oliveira et al., 2012,

Reatto et al., 2009, Sarcinelli et al., 2009]. Faunal activity in latosols continuously brings material from the saprolite and deep horizons to the upper horizons, thus bringing up minerals such as the 2:1 phyllosilicates studied here to the Bw horizons. These phyllosilicates are allochthonous and continue their
<table><caption>**Table 3.** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3e and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>41.76</td><td>46.96</td><td>1.71</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.52</td><td>7.45</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>40.47</td><td>48.90</td><td>1.42</td><td>0.33</td><td>0.03</td><td>7.69</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>40.85</td><td>47.81</td><td>1.39</td><td>0.98</td><td>0.03</td><td>7.30</td><td>1.04</td><td>0.61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>39.75</td><td>48.56</td><td>1.25</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.45</td><td>8.11</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.54</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40.19</td><td>48.64</td><td>1.24</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.46</td><td>8.01</td><td>0.60</td><td>0.37</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>41.97</td><td>47.52</td><td>1.30</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.49</td><td>7.58</td><td>0.27</td><td>0.34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>63.97</td><td>23.04</td><td>11.61</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>63.93</td><td>22.02</td><td>11.90</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.99</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>64.20</td><td>24.29</td><td>10.01</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 3f and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>38.97</td><td>47.79</td><td>2.38</td><td>1.04</td><td>0.34</td><td>7.84</td><td>1.30</td><td>0.35</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>39.68</td><td>48.30</td><td>2.48</td><td>0.39</td><td>0.00</td><td>8.16</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>39.13</td><td>47.99</td><td>1.92</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.44</td><td>8.64</td><td>0.59</td><td>0.88</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.89</td><td>46.42</td><td>3.09</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.07</td><td>8.20</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.36</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40.19</td><td>47.87</td><td>2.17</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.51</td><td>7.82</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.62</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>41.55</td><td>46.06</td><td>2.92</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.41</td><td>7.59</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.38</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>43.42</td><td>43.85</td><td>3.72</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.66</td><td>6.70</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.68</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>39.37</td><td>47.29</td><td>2.10</td><td>1.05</td><td>0.38</td><td>8.09</td><td>1.32</td><td>0.39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>38.66</td><td>47.80</td><td>2.40</td><td>1.11</td><td>0.48</td><td>7.85</td><td>1.29</td><td>0.40</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>60.19</td><td>28.43</td><td>9.31</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.46</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>64.94</td><td>24.29</td><td>7.73</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.18</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>62.07</td><td>25.26</td><td>10.49</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.04</td><td>1.86</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>59.06</td><td>28.84</td><td>10.81</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>56.12</td><td>31.63</td><td>10.70</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.43</td></tr></tbody></table>

transformation in the physico-chemical context of the Bw horizons. The presence, in the Bw horizon, of large particles of 2:1 phyllosilicates belonging to the silt-size class and with a chemical composition consistent with that of a weathered muscovite or of HIVs is not consistent with the fact that latosols result from a long sequence of weathering producing a clay-size fraction composed of kaolinite, gibbsite, goethite and hematite in different proportions depending on the parent material and landscape position [Curi and Franzmeier, 1984, Macedo and Bryant, 1987, Ker, 1997, Melfi and Pédro, 1977, 1978, Reatto et al., 2008, Schaefer et al., 2008].

The presence of allochthonous 2:1 phyllosilicates was shown in termite mounds developed in African soils analogous to latosols. Mujinya et al. [2013] studied the clay composition of the material forming termite mounds in D.R. Congo and showed that the termite-mound material was enriched in 2:1 phyllosilicates, mainly mica and expandable clay minerals. They concluded that this enrichment resulted from the upward transport of mica- and expandable clay-bearing soil or saprolite material by termites. Thus, the 2:1 phyllosilicates brought by faunal activity in the Bw horizons continue their transformation in the Bw horizon under stronger acidic conditions
<table><caption>**Table 4.** Chemical analysis of the particles shown in the backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) and of their surrounding groundmass (Figure 4) using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4a and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>48.92</td><td>38.93</td><td>11.05</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.96</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>49.10</td><td>40.26</td><td>9.87</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.70</td><td>40.38</td><td>10.89</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>59.96</td><td>20.41</td><td>17.45</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>55.33</td><td>22.43</td><td>20.24</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.93</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>58.86</td><td>21.13</td><td>18.06</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.01</td><td>1.45</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4b and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>47.78</td><td>38.84</td><td>9.18</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.06</td><td>2.72</td><td>0.10</td><td>1.24</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>46.52</td><td>39.11</td><td>9.67</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.00</td><td>2.89</td><td>0.20</td><td>1.55</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4c and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>50.27</td><td>33.04</td><td>12.87</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.88</td><td>0.10</td><td>1.31</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>49.53</td><td>32.94</td><td>14.34</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.03</td><td>1.72</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.20</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>50.50</td><td>31.43</td><td>14.82</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.27</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.37</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>53.51</td><td>23.54</td><td>21.23</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.03</td><td>1.56</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>55.47</td><td>18.48</td><td>24.42</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>56.13</td><td>20.86</td><td>19.74</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.97</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4d and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>48.05</td><td>32.47</td><td>18.39</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.97</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>50.62</td><td>34.54</td><td>13.55</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>50.78</td><td>34.41</td><td>13.74</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.03</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>58.37</td><td>23.76</td><td>16.56</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.27</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>58.42</td><td>19.40</td><td>17.19</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>4.81</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>55.82</td><td>25.18</td><td>16.72</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.01</td><td>2.03</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4e and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>53.39</td><td>37.72</td><td>8.58</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>50.79</td><td>42.95</td><td>5.15</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>66.06</td><td>26.42</td><td>6.38</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>66.24</td><td>25.77</td><td>6.74</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.88</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 4f and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>51.22</td><td>45.07</td><td>3.11</td><td>0.33</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>51.21</td><td>45.90</td><td>2.46</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>50.53</td><td>45.26</td><td>2.95</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.73</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>64.50</td><td>24.03</td><td>9.81</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>64.65</td><td>20.33</td><td>13.60</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>61.89</td><td>27.16</td><td>9.87</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.89</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table 5.** Chemical analysis of the particles shown in the backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) and of their surrounding groundmass (Figure 5) using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="7">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5a and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>39.11</td><td>46.56</td><td>4.65</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.48</td><td>7.94</td><td>0.60</td><td>0.39</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>36.90</td><td>47.24</td><td>5.21</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.03</td><td>8.46</td><td>0.66</td><td>1.02</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>36.61</td><td>47.41</td><td>4.68</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.02</td><td>9.04</td><td>0.72</td><td>1.08</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>37.28</td><td>47.49</td><td>3.58</td><td>0.50</td><td>0.06</td><td>9.28</td><td>0.88</td><td>0.93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>35.91</td><td>47.06</td><td>4.50</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.09</td><td>10.24</td><td>0.68</td><td>1.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>36.54</td><td>46.76</td><td>6.77</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.00</td><td>7.91</td><td>0.43</td><td>1.11</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>35.67</td><td>47.38</td><td>5.19</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.13</td><td>9.45</td><td>0.57</td><td>1.13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>40.35</td><td>45.18</td><td>12.32</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.85</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>43.11</td><td>45.48</td><td>9.45</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.24</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.47</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>42.02</td><td>41.83</td><td>14.98</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.59</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>30.63</td><td>51.71</td><td>6.65</td><td>3.06</td><td>0.17</td><td>7.41</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.36</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>39.16</td><td>47.71</td><td>6.97</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.03</td><td>4.86</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>41.37</td><td>37.67</td><td>18.28</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.13</td><td>1.40</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>42.75</td><td>40.02</td><td>15.97</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.35</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>31.81</td><td>52.86</td><td>13.65</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.25</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>35.35</td><td>42.74</td><td>18.51</td><td>1.50</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.91</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5b and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>32.20</td><td>45.17</td><td>11.40</td><td>1.60</td><td>0.08</td><td>9.06</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.37</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>30.86</td><td>47.86</td><td>8.99</td><td>1.69</td><td>0.00</td><td>9.99</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>31.49</td><td>48.56</td><td>8.36</td><td>1.62</td><td>0.00</td><td>9.40</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.82</td><td>48.34</td><td>8.32</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.65</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.39</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>39.70</td><td>36.42</td><td>21.77</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.23</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>40.33</td><td>41.45</td><td>17.03</td><td>0.32</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>43.04</td><td>40.69</td><td>14.12</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.93</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>7.66</td><td>6.56</td><td>3.38</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.00</td><td>82.15</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>40.61</td><td>48.25</td><td>10.07</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.43</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>38.50</td><td>38.60</td><td>20.35</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.08</td><td>1.21</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>29.08</td><td>49.12</td><td>10.15</td><td>2.96</td><td>0.14</td><td>8.16</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.36</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>32.21</td><td>43.02</td><td>14.70</td><td>1.55</td><td>0.10</td><td>7.74</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.43</td></tr></tbody></table>

(continued on next page)

than in the deep horizons or saprolite from where they originated and can thus be further aluminized. The lack of exchangeable Al³⁺ in LSAS and its weak amount in LVS (Table 2) are consistent with the presence of hydroxy-aluminum in the interlayer space of

the 2:1 clay minerals as described by Velde and Meunier [2008].

The accumulation of materials originating from deeper horizons or even from the saprolite in chambers or channels resulting from termite or ant
<table><caption>**Table 5.** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5c and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>41.24</td><td>52.68</td><td>5.34</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.37</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>37.17</td><td>55.26</td><td>6.90</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>42.26</td><td>54.25</td><td>3.09</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>42.11</td><td>52.90</td><td>4.60</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.03</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>41.29</td><td>50.25</td><td>7.73</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>42.39</td><td>46.80</td><td>9.93</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.44</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>38.70</td><td>47.06</td><td>9.52</td><td>1.49</td><td>0.11</td><td>2.40</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>38.60</td><td>44.33</td><td>10.35</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.59</td><td>0.04</td><td>4.50</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>37.44</td><td>47.56</td><td>9.83</td><td>1.57</td><td>0.15</td><td>2.81</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.64</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>40.80</td><td>45.95</td><td>10.54</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.34</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.75</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5d and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>42.48</td><td>41.42</td><td>14.12</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.96</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>28.99</td><td>57.32</td><td>8.37</td><td>1.39</td><td>0.00</td><td>3.60</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>32.26</td><td>51.30</td><td>9.82</td><td>1.72</td><td>0.03</td><td>4.34</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.82</td><td>49.64</td><td>6.89</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.09</td><td>1.53</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40.97</td><td>53.53</td><td>3.48</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.59</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.18</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>41.05</td><td>53.06</td><td>4.64</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.80</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>39.16</td><td>48.03</td><td>11.07</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.14</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>34.86</td><td>48.17</td><td>13.46</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.04</td><td>2.00</td><td>0.06</td><td>1.06</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>38.99</td><td>37.44</td><td>22.01</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.96</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>40.38</td><td>44.10</td><td>11.89</td><td>0.56</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.86</td><td>0.01</td><td>1.21</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5e and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>33.21</td><td>47.81</td><td>10.54</td><td>1.84</td><td>0.09</td><td>5.50</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>33.41</td><td>47.68</td><td>9.64</td><td>1.96</td><td>0.14</td><td>6.08</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.03</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>34.26</td><td>45.36</td><td>13.77</td><td>1.89</td><td>0.15</td><td>3.61</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>35.69</td><td>47.15</td><td>13.15</td><td>2.27</td><td>0.14</td><td>1.03</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.54</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>34.27</td><td>47.79</td><td>10.21</td><td>1.95</td><td>0.05</td><td>4.85</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.83</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>38.88</td><td>45.85</td><td>12.21</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.85</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>40.89</td><td>38.43</td><td>19.50</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>41.68</td><td>35.48</td><td>19.45</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.02</td><td>3.06</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>39.48</td><td>42.59</td><td>14.73</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.99</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.87</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>41.42</td><td>42.12</td><td>15.47</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.71</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>40.41</td><td>42.82</td><td>16.47</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>39.99</td><td>43.61</td><td>15.26</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.55</td></tr></tbody></table>

(continued on next page)
<table><caption>**Table 5.** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 5f and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>38.71</td><td>47.97</td><td>4.20</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.00</td><td>7.19</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.84</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>38.42</td><td>47.10</td><td>3.75</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.08</td><td>8.89</td><td>0.62</td><td>0.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>41.72</td><td>38.36</td><td>18.31</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.32</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>42.02</td><td>38.14</td><td>18.13</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>41.84</td><td>44.28</td><td>12.94</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>41.00</td><td>43.79</td><td>11.32</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.04</td><td>3.46</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>42.17</td><td>37.12</td><td>19.42</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.78</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Respective content in Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO: (a) in the small elongated particles (light blue points, see Table 4) and surrounding groundmass (red points, see Table 4) of LSAS; (b) in the large elongated particles (light blue points, see Table 6) and surrounding groundmass (red points, see Table 6) of LVS. Theoretical composition of muscovite (deep blue point) [Velde and Meunier, 2008], composition of muscovite particles (brown point) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] and of weathered muscovite particles (yellow point) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] are also plotted.</figcaption></figure>

burrowing activity was often described in the field and is easily recognizable due to the difference in color with the surrounding horizon material [Araujo, 2013]. Much earlier, Lepage et al. [1974] observed active termite channels used to collect water from the water table between 45 and 55 m depth in weathered clayey and calcareous formations in North Senegal. A few years later, Leprun and Roy-Noël [1976] showed the presence of both micas and vermiculite particles originating from subterranean saprolite materials in termite mounds. The accumulation in the topsoil of material originating from the deep horizon was also discussed by Boulet et al. [1995] who evaluated the

rate of surface biological accumulation of soil matter using radiocarbon dating on charcoal and the soil humin fraction in latosols located in the Minas Gerais state. They found that the rate of accumulation in the latosols studied was 0.21 to 0.23 mm·year⁻¹, a rate consistent with those computed by Miklos [1992] which were 0.21 to 0.34 mm·year⁻¹. With such accumulation rates, biological activity brings a thickness of about 2 to 3 m of soil material to the surface of the soil in 10,000 years.

If we retain the hypothesis that the 2:1 phyllosiliates present in the Bw horizons have been brought by faunal activity, this is consistent with the presence
<table><caption>**Table 6.** Chemical analysis of the particles shown in the backscattered electron scanning images (BESI) and of their surrounding groundmass (Figure 6) using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6a and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>41.55</td><td>50.84</td><td>6.87</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.32</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>41.66</td><td>51.48</td><td>5.93</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.27</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>41.77</td><td>51.66</td><td>5.34</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.92</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>42.87</td><td>51.84</td><td>4.62</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.00</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>41.26</td><td>47.30</td><td>10.47</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>40.63</td><td>45.40</td><td>12.49</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.66</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.41</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>35.63</td><td>47.61</td><td>10.53</td><td>1.55</td><td>0.10</td><td>4.14</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>36.31</td><td>45.63</td><td>13.86</td><td>1.31</td><td>0.12</td><td>1.99</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.71</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>29.41</td><td>52.53</td><td>12.09</td><td>1.29</td><td>0.04</td><td>3.74</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.87</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>36.27</td><td>49.75</td><td>8.60</td><td>1.25</td><td>0.00</td><td>3.62</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>36.54</td><td>44.93</td><td>13.63</td><td>1.32</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.76</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.79</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>43.31</td><td>42.31</td><td>12.81</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.78</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>35.92</td><td>46.34</td><td>16.45</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.29</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>41.90</td><td>40.59</td><td>13.40</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.00</td><td>3.50</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6b and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>37.54</td><td>43.27</td><td>13.62</td><td>1.41</td><td>0.09</td><td>1.78</td><td>0.00</td><td>2.28</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>37.74</td><td>44.82</td><td>11.90</td><td>1.72</td><td>0.20</td><td>2.83</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>38.34</td><td>46.03</td><td>11.12</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.07</td><td>2.25</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.80</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>41.08</td><td>42.60</td><td>11.55</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.02</td><td>2.89</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>41.23</td><td>41.53</td><td>12.91</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.89</td><td>0.13</td><td>1.12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>42.75</td><td>39.61</td><td>16.42</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>46.08</td><td>34.53</td><td>17.98</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>43.33</td><td>33.49</td><td>21.46</td><td>0.31</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>42.61</td><td>33.97</td><td>22.52</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.44</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6c and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>43.08</td><td>52.28</td><td>4.39</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>40.49</td><td>51.33</td><td>7.46</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>36.81</td><td>44.28</td><td>18.27</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.11</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.46</td><td>40.20</td><td>17.53</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40.67</td><td>43.35</td><td>14.04</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>40.94</td><td>46.26</td><td>12.09</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.40</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>41.72</td><td>39.11</td><td>17.97</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.64</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>41.29</td><td>43.37</td><td>14.27</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.66</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>44.01</td><td>37.11</td><td>17.34</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.74</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>38.34</td><td>37.33</td><td>22.46</td><td>0.41</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.54</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.80</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>41.19</td><td>37.75</td><td>18.52</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.02</td><td>1.62</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>42.51</td><td>38.28</td><td>18.08</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.68</td></tr></tbody></table>

(continued on next page)
<table><caption>**Table 6.** (continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Analysis number</th><th colspan="8">% of oxides</th></tr><tr><th>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th>MgO</th><th>CaO</th><th>K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th>TiO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6d and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>41.59</td><td>47.74</td><td>9.87</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.58</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>42.31</td><td>47.52</td><td>8.77</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>40.39</td><td>46.88</td><td>11.69</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>40.53</td><td>44.94</td><td>13.47</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.19</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>43.61</td><td>36.49</td><td>17.42</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.04</td><td>2.11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>43.03</td><td>35.01</td><td>20.79</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.68</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>42.09</td><td>35.86</td><td>20.70</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.87</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>42.58</td><td>36.34</td><td>19.79</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>41.65</td><td>38.55</td><td>18.29</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.07</td><td>1.03</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>41.81</td><td>36.87</td><td>19.52</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.66</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6e and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>38.98</td><td>42.20</td><td>15.39</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.15</td><td>1.56</td><td>0.03</td><td>1.17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>43.15</td><td>47.69</td><td>8.66</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>41.82</td><td>41.78</td><td>14.39</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.03</td><td>1.29</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>41.77</td><td>48.40</td><td>9.27</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.38</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>40.55</td><td>47.26</td><td>10.96</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.21</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.83</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>43.53</td><td>36.03</td><td>19.14</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>41.18</td><td>36.86</td><td>18.03</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.00</td><td>3.61</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>42.25</td><td>39.14</td><td>16.82</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.00</td><td>1.01</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>41.43</td><td>35.64</td><td>20.00</td><td>0.29</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.03</td><td>2.21</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9">Particle in Figure 6f and surrounding groundmass</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>41.76</td><td>51.52</td><td>5.44</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.05</td><td>1.07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>34.50</td><td>44.83</td><td>14.17</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.17</td><td>5.34</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.60</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>42.70</td><td>38.02</td><td>17.92</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.57</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>37.49</td><td>34.52</td><td>17.96</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.01</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.00</td><td>9.83</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>29.00</td><td>58.98</td><td>7.45</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.14</td><td>3.54</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.51</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>35.78</td><td>45.78</td><td>12.57</td><td>0.51</td><td>0.22</td><td>4.64</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.42</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>41.19</td><td>49.47</td><td>6.33</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.14</td><td>0.09</td><td>2.73</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>42.48</td><td>52.42</td><td>4.56</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.24</td></tr></tbody></table>

of mica in the <2 µm fraction of the saprolite of LVS as shown by Reatto et al. [2010] by using XRD on powder samples. Their absence in the <2 µm fraction of the saprolite of LSAS as shown also by Reatto et al. [2010] on powder samples, while observed on the polished section of the Bw horizon, is likely related to their lower content consistently with the lower content of

elongated particles observed in LSAS compared to LVS, as discussed above.

## 4. Conclusion

Our results showed that the 2:1 phyllosilicates present in Bw horizons of latosols and identified
<table><caption>**Table 7.** Chemical composition of the half unit cell computed for the point of analysis exhibiting the highest K₂O content in some of the largest elongated particles evidenced in LSAS and LVS</caption><thead><tr><th>Location</th><th>Chemical composition of the half unit cell</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Figure 3a, point no 3</td><td>[Si<sub>3.14</sub>Al<sub>0.86</sub>]O<sub>10</sub>[Al<sub>1.74</sub>Fe<sub>0.15</sub>Mg<sub>0.10</sub>Ti<sub>0.03</sub>](OH)<sub>2</sub>K<sub>0.81</sub>Ca<sub>0.00</sub>Na<sub>0.06</sub></td></tr><tr><td>Figure 3d, point no 11</td><td>[Si<sub>3.07</sub>Al<sub>0.93</sub>]O<sub>10</sub>[Al<sub>1.64</sub>Fe<sub>0.35</sub>Mg<sub>0.07</sub>Ti<sub>0.03</sub>](OH)<sub>2</sub>K<sub>0.70</sub>Ca<sub>0.01</sub>Na<sub>0.02</sub></td></tr><tr><td>Figure 5a, point no 5</td><td>[Si<sub>3.01</sub>Al<sub>0.99</sub>]O<sub>10</sub>[Al<sub>1.71</sub>Fe<sub>0.22</sub>Mg<sub>0.05</sub>Ti<sub>0.05</sub>](OH)<sub>2</sub>K<sub>0.84</sub>Ca<sub>0.01</sub>Na<sub>0.09</sub></td></tr><tr><td>Figure 5b, point no 2</td><td>[Si<sub>3.10</sub>Al<sub>0.90</sub>]O<sub>10</sub>[Al<sub>1.45</sub>Fe<sub>0.44</sub>Mg<sub>0.16</sub>Ti<sub>0.03</sub>](OH)<sub>2</sub>K<sub>0.83</sub>Ca<sub>0.00</sub>Na<sub>0.00</sub></td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** Change in the respective content in Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO from core particle to areas of the particle showing weathering morphology in the elongated particle of Figure 3b (light blue points), Figure 3d (red points), Figure 5a (green points) and Figure 5d (purple points). The respective content in Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and K₂O + Na₂O + CaO of a theoretical muscovite (deep blue point) [Velde and Meunier, 2008], muscovite particles (brown points) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] and weathered muscovite particles (yellow points) [Aurousseau et al., 1983] are also plotted as references.</figcaption></figure>

by many authors as mica or HIVs by using XRD can be recognized on BESI as elongated particles 1 to 30 µm long and 0.2 to 5 µm wide, most of them showing an internal layer organization. The chemical composition of the core of the largest particles in the two Bw horizons was consistent with poorly weathered muscovite with probably a small proportion of Al in the interlayer space as hydroxy-Al.

When the K₂O content decreased, indicative of a stronger weathering of the primary minerals such as muscovite, the chemical analysis showed that the proportion of hydroxy-Al in the interlayer space increased. We assume that these particles correspond to the HIVs recognized earlier in the literature. The fact that HIVs were not identified in the clay fraction of LSAS by XRD whereas they were for LVS has to be related to the much lower number of particles with morphologies and chemical compositions of 2:1 minerals, particularly those <2 µm in size, ranging from poorly weathered muscovite to HIVs in LSAS compared to LVS.

The morphology of the largest particles of weathered muscovite and the likelihood of HIVs observed in the groundmass of the two Bw horizons studied and their presence in high proportions in some areas of the groundmass of LVS indicate that they are allochthonous, originating from deep horizons of the latosols studied or from the saprolite in which the latosol has developed. According to this hypothesis, their presence in the Bw horizons studied should result from the transport of material by termite activity from horizons where the presence of these minerals is consistent with the geochemical processes responsible for the weathering of the parent material. Thus, we argue that the strong microgranular structure results from fragmentation and burrowing activity while the weak to moderate microgranular structure corresponds to old portions of channel and cavity walls, thus explaining why the microaggregates, whatever the microgranular structure development, incorporate allochthonous weathered muscovite and HIV particles.

Finally, our results are in favor of the biological origin of the microgranular structure of latosols as discussed previously in many papers. They show that some latosols should be considered as a biomantle
in which the physical properties related to the mi-
crostructure development, and the chemical prop-
erties related to the presence of weathered mus-
covites and HIVs, result from faunal activity since
they started developing. Future work will analyze the
degree of generality of the results obtained in our
study and will also aim at analyzing both the devel-
opment of the microgranular structure, the distribu-
tion of 2:1 minerals and the activity of termites over
the entire thickness of latosols, from saprolite to the
surface horizon.

Conflicts of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ida Di Carlo for man-
aging the SEM/EDS equipment as well as providing
expert advice on the chemical analyses recorded.
They also thank Christian Le Lay for impregnating
the samples, Sylvain Janiec for preparing high qual-
ity polished sections and Patricia Benoist-Juliot for
technical assistance during observation and analy-
sis sessions with the SEM/EDS. Finally, the authors
acknowledge support from the LabEx VOLTAIRE
(LABX-100-01) project.

References

Almeida, C. C., Fontes, M. P. F., Dias, A. C., Pereira, T. T. C., and Ker, J. C. (2021). Mineralogical, chemical and electrochemical attributes of soils. *Sci. Agric.*, 78(6), article no. e20200071.

Antonello, A. A. (1988). Mineralogy of the deferrified clay fraction in B horizon of pedons of the VI-IIIth International Soil Classification Workshop. In Beinroth, F. H., Camargo, M. N., and Eswaram, H., editors, *Classification, Characterization and Utilization of Oxisols, Part 1: Papers*, Proceedings of the Eight International Soil Classification Workshop, Brazil, SNLCS-Embrapa, Soil Management Support Services and Soil Conservation Service—United States Department of Agriculture, University of Puerto Rico, pages 109–138.

Araujo, A. G. M. (2013). Bioturbation and the upward movement of sediment particles and archaeological materials: comments on Bueno et al. *J. Archeol. Sci.*, 40(4), 2124–2127.

Assad, E. D., Sano, E. E., Masutomo, R., Castro, L. H. R., and Silva, F. A. M. (1993). Veranicos na região dos cerrados brasileiros: freqüência e probabilidade de ocorrência. *Pesqui. Agropec. Bras.*, 28, 993-1002.

Aurousseau, P., Curmi, P., Bouille, S., and Charpentier, S. (1983). Les vermiculites hydroxyalumineuses du Massif Armoricain (France). Approche minéralogique, microanalytique et thermodynamique. *Geoderma*, 31, 17-40.

Balbino, L. C., Bruand, A., Brossard, M., Grimaldi, M., Hajnos, M., and Guimarães, M. D. F. (2002). Change in porosity and microaggregation in clayey Ferralsols of Brazilian Cerrado on clearing for pasture. *Eur. J. Soil Sci.*, 53, 219-230.

Balbino, L. C., Bruand, A., Cousin, I., Brossard, M., Quétin, P., and Grimaldi, M. (2004). Change in hydraulic properties of a Brazilian clay Ferralsol on clearing for pasture. *Geoderma*, 120, 297-307.

Bertolazi, V. T., Inda, A. V., Caner, L., Martins, A. P., Vaz, M. A. B., Bonnet, M., Anghinoni, I., and Carvalho, P. C. F. (2017). Impact of an integrated no-till soybean-beef cattle production system on Oxisol mineralogy in southern Brazil. *Appl. Clay Sci.*, 149, 67-74.

Bortoluzzi, E. C., Velde, B., Pernes, M., Dur, J. C., and Tessier, D. (2008). Vermiculite, with hydroxy-aluminium interlayer, and kaolinite formation in a subtropical sandy soil from south Brazil. *Clay Miner.*, 43, 185-193.

Boulet, R., Pessenda, L. C. R., Telles, E. C. C., and Melfi, A. J. (1995). Une évaluation de la vitesse de l'accumulation superficielle de matière par la faune du sol à partir de la datation des charbons et de l'humine du sol. Exemple des latosols des versants du lac Campestre, Salitre, Minas Gerais, Brésil. *C. R. Acad. Sci.*, 320(II a), 287-294.

Brito Galvão, T. C. D. and Schulze, D. (1996). Mineralogical properties of a collapsible lateritic soil from Minas Gerais Brazil. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 60, 1969-1978.

Bruand, A., Cousin, I., Nicoulland, B., Duval, O., and Bégon, J. C. (1996). Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analyzing soil compaction around roots. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 60, 895-901.

Campos, J. E. G. (2012). Geologia do Distrito Federal. In *Zoneamento Ecológico-Econômico do Distrito Federal*, page 172. Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Regional.
mento Urbano e Habitação/Governo do Distrito Federal, Brasília-DF. Subproduto 3.1.

Campos, J. E. G., Dardenne, M. A., Freitas-Silva, F. H., and Martins-Ferreira, M. A. C. (2013). Geologia do Grupo Paranoá na porção externa da Faixa Brasília. *Braz. J. Geol.*, 43(3), 461-476.

Caner, L., Radtke, L. M., Vignol-Lelarge, L. M., Inda Jr, A. V., Bortoluzzi, E. C., and Mexias, A. S. (2014). Basalt and rhyo-dacite weathering and soil clay formation under subtropical climate in southern Brazil. *Geoderma*, 235-236, 100-112.

Cooper, M., Vidal-Torrado, P., and Chaplot, V. (2005). Origin of microaggregates in soils with ferralic horizons. *Sci. Agric.*, 62(3), 256-263.

Cosarinsky, M. I., Bellosi, E. S., and Genise, J. F. (2005). Micromorphology of modern epigean termite nests and possible termite ichnofossils: a comparative analysis (Isoptera). *Sociobiology*, 45, 745-778.

Costa, A. C. S., Bigham, J. M., Tormena, C. A., and Pintro, J. C. (2004). Clay mineralogy and cation exchange capacity of Brazilian soils from water contents determined by thermal analysis. *Thermochim. Acta*, 413, 73-79.

Curi, N. and Franzmeier, D. (1984). Toposquence of oxisols from central plateau of Brazil. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 48, 341-346.

Embrapa (1999). *Sistema Brasileiro de classificação de solos*. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Rio de Janeiro-RJ. page 412.

Embrapa (2006). *Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos*. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Rio de Janeiro-RJ. page 306.

Eschenbrenner, V. (1986). Contribution des termites à la micro-agrégation des sols tropicaux. Cahiers ORSTOM. *Série Pédologie*, 22, 397-408.

Freitas, D. F., Ker, J. C., Silva Filho, L. A., Pereira, T. T. C., Souza, O. F. F., and Schaefer, C. E. G. R. (2021). Pedogeomorphology and paleoenvironmental implications of large termite mounds at the Brazilian semiarid landscape. *Geomorphology*, 387, article no. 107762.

Furian, S., Barbiéro, L., Boulet, R., Curmi, P., Grimaldi, M., and Grimaldi, C. (2002). Distribution and dynamic of gibbsite and kaolinite in an Oxisol of Serra do Mar, southeastern Brazil. *Geoderma*, 106, 83-100.

Gomes, J. M. V., Curi, N., Schulze, D. G., Marques, J. J. G. S. M., Ker, j. C., and Motta, P. E. F. (2004).

Mineralogia, morfologia e análise microscópica de solos do Bioma Cerrado. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 28, 679-694.

Holt, A. J. and Lepage, M. (2000). Termites and soil properties. In Abe, T., Bignell, D. E., and Higashi, M., editors, *Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology*, volume 18, pages 389-407. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

IUSS Working Group WRB (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015. In *International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps*, World Soil Resources Reports No 106. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy.

Jouquet, P., Chintakunta, S., Bottinelli, N., Subramanian, S., and Caner, L. (2016). The influence of fungus-growing termites on soil macro and microaggregates stability varies with soil type. *Appl. Soil Ecol.*, 101, 117-123.

Jungerius, P. D., van den Ancker, J. A. M., and Mücher, H. J. (1999). The contribution of termite to the microgranular structure of soils on the Uasin Gishu Plateau, Kenya. *Catena*, 34, 349-363.

Karathanasis, A. D., Adams, F., and Hajek, B. F. (1983). Stability relationships in kaolinite, gibbsite, and Al-hydroxyinterlayered vermiculite soil systems. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 47, 1247-1251.

Ker, J. C. (1995). *Mineralogia, sorção e dessorção de fosfato, magnetização e elementos traços de Latossolos do Brasil*. PhD thesis, Universidade de Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brasil.

Ker, J. C. (1997). Latossolos do Brasil: uma revisão. *Geonomos*, 5(1), 17-40.

Ker, J. C. and Resende, M. (1990). Caracterização química e mineralógica dos solos brunos subtropicais do Brasil. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 14, 215-225.

King, L. C. (1956). A geomorfologia do Brasil Central. *Rev. Bras. Geogr.*, 18(2), 3-39.

Köppen, W. P. (1931). *Grundriss der Klimakunde*. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

Lepage, M., Morel, G., and Resplendino, C. (1974). Découverte de galeries de termites atteignant la nappe phréatique profonde dans le Nord du Sénégal. *C. R. Acad. Sci.*, 278, 1855-1858.

Leprun, J. C. and Roy-Noël, J. (1976). Minéralogie des argiles et répartition des nids épigés de deux espèces du genre Macrotermes au Sénégal occidental (Presqu'île du Cap-Vert). *Insectes Soc.*, 23, 535-547.
Lepsch, I. F. and Buol, S. W. (1974). Investigations in a Oxisol-Ultisol toposequence in S. Paulo State, Brazil. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 38, 491–496.

Macedo, J. and Bryant, R. B. (1987). Morphology, mineralogy, and genesis of a hydrosequence of Oxisols in Brazil. *Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.*, 51, 690–698.

Maquere, V., Laclau, J. P., Bernoux, M., Saint-Andre, L., Gonçalvez, L. M., Cerri, C. C., Piccolo, C., and Ranger, J. (2008). Influence of land use (savanna, pasture, Eucalyptus plantations) on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in Brazil. *Eur. J. Soil Sci.*, 59, 863–877.

Marcelino, V., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., and Stoops, G. (2018). Oxic and related material. In Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., and Mees, F., editors, *Interpretations of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Re-goliths*, pages 663–689. Elsevier, B.V., 2nd edition.

Marques, F. A., Calegari, M. R., Vidal-Torrado, P., and Buurman, P. (2011). Relationship between soil oxidizable carbon and physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of Umbric Ferralsols. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 35, 25–40.

Marques, J. J., Schulze, D. G., Curi, N., and Merttzman, S. A. (2004). Major element geochemistry and geomorphic relationships in Brazilian Cerrado soils. *Geoderma*, 119, 179–195.

Melfi, A. J. and Pédro, G. (1977). Estudo geoquímico dos solos e formações superficiais do Brasil. Parte 1 – Caracterização e repartição dos principais tipos de evolução pedogeoquímica. *Rev. Bras. Geoci.*, 7, 271–286.

Melfi, A. J. and Pédro, G. (1978). Estudo geoquímico dos solos e formações superficiais do Brasil. Parte 2 – Considerações sobre os mecanismos geoquímicos envolvidos na alteração superficial e sua reparação no Brasil. *Rev. Bras. Geoci.*, 8, 11–22.

Melo, G. W., Meurer, E. J., and Pinto, L. F. S. (2004). Potassium-bearing minerals in two oxisols of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 28(4), 597–603.

Meunier, A. (2007). Soil hydroxy-interlayered minerals: a re-interpretation of their crystallochemical properties. *Clays Clay Miner.*, 55, 380–388.

Miklos, A. A. (1992). *Biodynamique d'une couverture pédologique dans la région de Botucatu (Brésil, SP).* PhD thesis, Université Paris VI.

Motta, P. E. F., Carvalho Filho, A., Ker, J. C., Pereira, N. R., Carvalho Junior, W., and Blancaneaux, P. (2002). Relações solo-superfície geomórfica e

evolução da paisagem em uma área do Planalto Central Brasileiro. *Pesqui. Agropec. Bras.*, 37, 869–878.

Mujinya, B. B., Mees, F., Erens, H., Dumon, M., Baert, G., Boeckx, P., Ngongo, M., and van Ranst, E. (2013). Clay composition and properties in termite mounds of the Lubumbashi area, D.R. Congo. *Geo-derma*, 192, 304–315.

Oliveira, M. I. L., Benito, N. P., Camargo, A. J. A., Guimarães, M. F., and Brossard, M. (2012). Con-itermes Cumulans (Isoptera, Nasutitermitinae) colonies activity in controlled conditions on macro and micro-aggregated soil. *Rev. Ciênc. Agrár.*, 33(5), 1733–1744.

Oliviera, J. S., Inda, A. V., Barron, V., Torrent, J., Tiecher, T., and Camargo, F. A. D. (2020). Soil properties governing phosphorus adsorption in soils of Southern Brazil. *Geoderma Reg.*, 22, article no. e00318.

Pacheco, A. A., Ker, J. C., Schaefer, G. E. G. R., Fontes, M. P. F., Andrade, F. V., Martins, E. S., and Oliviera, F. S. (2018). Mineralogy, micromorphology and genesis of soils with varying drainage along a hillslope on granitic rocks of a Atlantic forest biome, Brazil. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 42, article no. e0170291.

Pédro, G. (1968). Distribution des principaux types d'altération chimique à la surface du globe. *Rev. Géogr. Phys. Géol. Dyn.*, X, 457–470.

Pereira, T. T. C., Ker, J. C., Schaeffer, C. E. G. R., Barros, N. F., Neves, J. C. L., and Almeida, C. C. (2010). Genesis of latosols and cambisols developed from pelitic rocks of the Bambui group, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo.*, 34, 1283–1295.

Pessoa, T. N., Cooper, M., Nunes, M. R., Uteau, D., Peth, S., Pedro Vaz, C. M., and Libardi, P. L. (2022). 2D and 3D techniques to assess the structure and porosity of Oxisols and their correlations with other soil properties. *Catena*, 210, article no. 105899.

Reatto, A., Bruand, A., Guilherme, L. R. G., Martins, E. S., Medrado, E., Brossard, M., and Muller, F. (2010). Geochemical processes in Latosols on the geomorphic surfaces from Brazilian Central Plateau. In *19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1–6 August 2010 Brisbane, Australia*, page 4.

Reatto, A., Bruand., A., Martins, E. S., Muller, F., Silva, E. M., Carvalho Jr, O. A., and Brossard, M. (2008).
Variation of the kaolinite and gibbsite content at regional and local scale in the Latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau. *C. R. Geosci.*, 340, 741–748.

Reatto, A., Bruand, A., Martins, E. S., Muller, F., Silva, E. M., Carvalho Jr, O. A., Brossard, M., and Richard, G. (2009). Development and origin of the microgranular structure in Latosols of the Brazilian Central Plateau: significance of texture, mineralogy and biological activity. *Catena*, 76, 122–134.

Reatto, A., Bruand, A., Silva, E. M., Martins, E. S., and Brossard, M. (2007). Hydraulic properties of the diagnostic horizon of Latosols of a regional toposequence across the Brazilian Central Plateau. *Geo derma*, 139, 51–59.

Reatto, A., Martins, E. S., Guimarães, E. M., Spera, S. T., and Correia, J. R. (2000). Variabilidade mineralógica de latossolos da área da Embrapa Cerrados em relação aos do Bioma Cerrado. *BP Embrapa Cerrados*, 20, 1–29.

Rodrigues Netto, A. (1996). *Influência da mineralogia da fração argila sobre propriedades físico-químicas de solos brasileiros*. PhD thesis, Universidade de Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brasil.

Sarcinelli, T. S., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., Lynch, L. S., Arato, H. D., Viana, J. H. M., Albuquerque Filho, M. R., and Gonçalves, T. T. (2009). Chemical, physical and micromorphological properties of терmite mounds and adjacent soils along a toposequence in Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. *Catena*, 76, 107–113.

Schaefer, C. E. G. R. (2001). Brazilian latosols and their B horizon microstructure as long-term biotic constructs. *Aust. J. Soil Res.*, 39, 909–926.

Schaefer, C. E. G. R., Fabris, J. D., and Ker, J. C. (2008). Minerals in the clay fraction of Brazilian latosols (Oxisols): a review. *Clay Miner.*, 43, 1–18.

Silva, A. V., Farias, M. F., Reatto, A., Martins, E. S.,

Brossard, M., Becquer, T., and Oliveira, O. R. (2005). Caracterização e distribuição das principais classes pedológicas do Planalto Central Brasileiro. In *Anais do XXV Congresso Brasileiro de Ciência do Solo, Recife-PE, Brasil*. SBCS. CD-ROM.

Soares, M. R., Alleoni, L. R. F., Vidal-Torrado, P., and Cooper, M. (2005). Mineralogy and ion exchange properties of the particle size fractions of some Brazilian soils in tropical humid areas. *Geoderma*, 125, 355–367.

Soil Survey Staff (2006). *Keys to Soil Taxonomy*. Unit States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, 8th edition.

Stoops, G. (1983). Micromorphology of the oxic horizon. In Bullock, P. and Murphy, C. P., editors, *Workshop Meeting on Soil Micromorphology*, volume 2, pages 419–440. Academic Publisher, Rothamsted, London.

Trapnell, C. G. and Webster, R. (1986). Microaggregates in red earths and related soils in East and Central Africa, their classification and occurrence. *J. Soil Sci.*, 37, 109–123.

Velde, B. and Meunier, A. (2008). *The Origin of Clay Minerals in Soils and Weathered Rocks*. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. page 406.

Volkoff, B. and Melfi, A. J. (1980). Mineralogical transformation in rubrozem soils of the Curitiba sedimentary basin, Parana, Brazil. *Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo*, 4, 173–181.

Volland-Tuduri, N., Bruand, A., Brossard, M., Balbino, L. C., de Oliviera, M. I. L., and Martins, F. D. S. (2005). Mass proportion of microaggregates and bulk density in a Brazilian clayey Oxisol. *Soil Soc. Sci. Am. J.*, 69, 1559–1564.

Webster, R. (1965). A catena of soils on the Northern Rhodesia plateau. *J. Soil Sci.*, 16, 31–43.