<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

# Biomechanics of the medical gesture for a peripheral venous catheter insertion

K. Torossian, M. Ottenio, A.-C. Brulez, Y. Lafon & S. Benayoun

**To cite this article:** K. Torossian, M. Ottenio, A.-C. Brulez, Y. Lafon & S. Benayoun (2019) Biomechanics of the medical gesture for a peripheral venous catheter insertion, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 22:sup1, S294-S295, DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1714918

**To link to this article:** https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1714918

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

© 2020 Universite Claude Bernard Lyon.
Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as
Taylor & Francis Group

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Published online: 22 May 2020.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Submit your article to this journal

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Article views: 420

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

View related articles

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

View Crossmark data

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

Citing articles: 1 View citing articles

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

# Biomechanics of the medical gesture for a peripheral venous catheter insertion

K. Torossian<sup>a,b,c,d</sup>, M. Ottenio<sup>b,c,d</sup>, A.-C. Brulez<sup>e</sup>, Y. Lafon<sup>b,c,d</sup> and S. Benayoun<sup>a</sup>

## 1. Introduction

Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion (PVCI) is the most common procedure performed by health professionals, but still remains technically difficult. Helm et al. (2015) observed that PVCI failure occurred 35% to 50% of the time leading to premature removal. A more realistic part-task simulator is currently in development to reduce this failure rate. Such a simulator should help healthcare students to train their gesture, and increase their skills before performing PVCI on patients. It is therefore crucial that such simulators behave like in vivo human skin when introducing the catheter into the vein.

Now, it is well known that force needed to puncture human tissues highly depends on several parameters such as geometry of the penetrator, loading conditions (velocity and angle insertion), as well as the degree of pre-stretch of soft tissues (Shergold and Fleck 2004). In order to select the best artificial material to mimic the mechanical response of skin and vein for a PVCI procedure, it is planned to develop an experimental setup, with fixed conditions close to the physiological ones for the medical procedure of interest here. Therefore, the present study is intended to analyse the gesture of a health professional during *in vivo* PVCIs, in order to extract the loading conditions of interest, as well as the rupture force of skin and vein. An experimental protocol is then set up with fixed conditions coming from the *in vivo* analysis, and tested with an *ex vivo* arm. A comparison between the rupture forces obtained *in vivo* and *ex vivo* is finally proposed.

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>Figure 1. (a) In vivo test. (b) Ex vivo setup.</figcaption></figure>

## 2. Methods

### 2.1. In-vivo protocol

PVCI was performed on the ventral forearm of five healthy volunteers aged 39.2 ± 15.3 years old by a nurse instructor. The medical gesture was recorded by two high-speed cameras (FASTCAM SA3, Photron, Japan) at 125 Hz. A tracking of targets located on the side of the catheter was performed with the help of an image correlation software (VIC 3D®-Correlated Solution) in order to get its insertion angle, and its speed via its measured displacement (see Figure 1a). The parameter was obtained by the projection of the needle axis on an orthonormal plane located in the neighbouring of the perforation area. The catheter includes a miniature 5 N load sensor (LSB 200-5 N; Andilog, France) to measure the puncture load ( ). The authorization for the study was granted by the ethic committee CPP of Ile-de-France V and the National Agency of Medicines Security under the reference number 2018-A02895-50.

### 2.2. Ex-vivo protocol

Puncture was performed on the forearm of an 87 years old fresh cadaver with a tensile machine testing (INSTRON 8802-High Wycombe, England), on which was mounted a 5 N load (SMT1-5N; PM Instrumentation, France). The same catheter as for *in vivo* tests was used. The displacement of the catheter is measured optically in the same way than for the *in vivo* protocol.

The average loading parameters extracted from *in vivo* tests were used to determine the experimental conditions for the *ex vivo* tests (see Figure 1b).

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes, UMR CNRS 5513, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, Ecully, France; <sup>b</sup>Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France; <sup>c</sup>Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; <sup>d</sup>IFSTTAR, UMR_T9406, LBMC, Bron, France; <sup>e</sup>Laboratoire de Génie de la Fonctionnalisation des Matériaux Polymères, Institut Textile et Chimique de Lyon, Ecully cedex, France</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Typical curve for a successful PVCI, with remarkable steps.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Comparison between *ex vivo* and *in vivo* puncture loads.</caption><thead><tr><th>Mean ± SD</th><th>Skin rupture load (N)</th><th>Vein rupture load (N)</th><th>Friction forces (N)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>In vivo (n = 5)</td><td>0.65 ± 0.27</td><td>0.98 ± 0.13</td><td>-0.58 ± 0.34</td></tr><tr><td>Ex vivo (n = 7)</td><td>0.46 ± 0.14</td><td>0.54 ± 0.18</td><td>-0.1 ± 0.02</td></tr></tbody></table>

### 3. Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the typical mechanical response of skin for a successful *in vivo* PVCI.

First, the load is increased due to skin stiffness until rupture (step 1) then cutting and friction forces come in (step 2) (Okamura et al. 2004) as the catheter progressed until touching the vein where a sudden load increase is visible right before its rupture. The following increase is due to friction forces as the practitioner is progressing into the vein's lumen until stopping its gesture to put a cotton on the punctured area (step 3). Finally, the catheter is withdrawn from the vein (step 4) and the skin (step 5). The analysis of the gesture of the practitioner *in vivo* gives a mean puncture velocity and a mean insertion angle of 11.38 ± 0.9 mm s⁻¹ and 13.9 ± 4°, respectively. Table 1 shows the mean peak load measured to puncture the skin and the vein as well as friction forces isolated

during the withdrawal of the catheter. The *in vivo* results are consistent with the only other study performed under similar conditions (Okuno et al. 1998) for which a peak load of 0.64 ± 0.23 was obtained when puncturing the vena mediana cubiti of 10 volunteers.

Overall, less force was needed to puncture *ex vivo* tissues and to withdraw the catheter. However, it is not yet possible to conclude on whether these differences are due to tissue state or age.

### 4. Conclusions

An *in vivo* protocol was developed to extract the loading conditions during puncture of the forearm as well as an *ex vivo* protocol reproducing said loading conditions. Further analysis over more volunteers is currently performed to confirm the results. An attempt to check the influence of age, sex and BMI over puncture loads will be tackled.

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Patrick Attali, nurse instructor, for performing the PVCIs and the project SAMSEI supported by ANR 11 IDFI 0034.

### References

* Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint LM, Huang E. 2015. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs. 38(3):189-203.

* Okamura A.M, Simone C, O'Leary M.D. 2004. Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51(10):1707-1716.

* Okuno D, Togawa T, Saito H, Tsuchiya K. 1998. Development of an automatic blood sampling system: control of the puncturing needle by measuring forces. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. vol. 20. p. 1811-1812.

* Shergold OA, Fleck NA. 2004. Mechanisms of deep penetration of soft solids, with application to the injection and wounding of skin. Proc R Soc Lond A. 460(2050): 3037-3058.

**KEYWORDS** Perforation; motion tracking; medical simulation; skin; vein

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

kevin.torossian@ec-lyon.fr