# Euclasta condylotricha flowers essential oils: A new source of juvenile hormones and its larvicidal activity against Anopheles gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae)

Roméo Barnabé Bohounton, Oswald Yédjinnavênan Djihinto, Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome, Réné Mahudro Yovo, Laurette Djossou, Koffi Koba, Aristide Adomou, Pierre Villeneuve, Luc Salako Djogbénou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo

► To cite this version:

Roméo Barnabé Bohounton, Oswald Yédjinnavênan Djihinto, Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome, Réné Mahudro Yovo, Laurette Djossou, et al. Euclasta condylotricha flowers essential oils: A new source of juvenile hormones and its larvicidal activity against Anopheles gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE, 2023, 18 (1), pp.e0278834. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278834. hal-04043493

HAL Id: hal-04043493

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04043493

Submitted on 23 Mar 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

*Euclasta condylotricha* flowers essential oils: A
new source of juvenile hormones and its
larvicidal activity against *Anopheles gambiae*
s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae)

Roméo Barnabé Bohounton¹,², Oswald Yédjinnavènan Djihinto², Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome¹, Réné Mahudro Yovo¹, Laurette Djossou², Koffi Koba³, Aristide Adomou⁴, Pierre Villeneuve⁵, Luc Salako Djogbénou²,⁶, Fidèle Paul Tchobo¹*

1 Laboratory of Study and Research of Applied Chemistry, Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin, 2 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research Centre (TIDRC)/ University of Abomey Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin, 3 Unité de Recherche sur les Matériaux et les Agroressources, École Supérieure D'agronomie, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo, 4 Laboratoire de Botanique et Écologie Végétale (LaBEV), Faculté des Sciences et Techniques (FAST), University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin, 5 Cirad, Persyst, UMR IATE, Montpellier, France, 6 Institut Régional de Santé Publique (IRSP), University of Abomey-Calavi, Ouidah, Benin

* fideletchobo@gmail.com

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Bohounton RB, Djihinto OY, Dedome OS-L, Yovo RM, Djossou L, Koba K, et al. (2023) *Euclasta condylotricha* flowers essential oils: A new source of juvenile hormones and its larvicidal activity against *Anopheles gambiae* s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE 18(1): e0278834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834

**Editor:** Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón,
Universidad Autonoma de Chihuahua, MEXICO

**Received:** June 29, 2022

**Accepted:** November 24, 2022

**Published:** January 23, 2023

**Peer Review History:** PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process; therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. The editorial history of this article is available here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834

**Copyright:** © 2023 Bohounton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Abstract

The essential oil (EO) of plants of the Poaceae family has diverse chemical constituents with several biological properties. But, data on the chemical constituents and toxicity are still unavailable for some species belonging to this family, such as *Euclasta condylotricha* Steud (*(Eu. condylotricha)*). In this study, the chemical composition of the EOs of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers was evaluated by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The EOs larvicidal property was assessed against third instar larvae of three *Anopheles gambiae* laboratory strains (Kisumu, Acerkis and Kiskdr) according to the WHO standard protocol. The percentage yields of the EOs obtained from hydro distillation of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers varied 0.070 to 0.097%. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) applied to the EOs revealed fifty-five (55) chemical constituents, representing 94.95% to 97.78% of the total essential oils. Although different chemical profiles of the dominant terpenes were observed for each sample, EOs were generally dominated by sesquiterpenoids with juvenile hormones as the major compounds. The primary compounds were juvenile hormone C16 (JH III) (35.97–48.72%), Methyl farnesoate 10,11-diol (18.56–28.73%), tau-Cadinol (18.54%), and β-Eudesmene (12.75–13.46%). *Eu. condylotricha* EOs showed a strong larvicidal activity with LC₅₀ values ranging from 35.21 to 52.34 ppm after 24 hours of exposition. This study showed that *Eu. Condylotricha* flowers essential oils are potent sources of juvenile hormones that could be a promising tool for developing an eco-friendly malaria vector control strategy.
**Funding:** This study received partial support from the Wellcome Trust in the form of an International Intermediate Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine grant to LSD [N° 109917/Z/15/ Z]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decision, or manuscript preparation.

**Competing interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

## Introduction

Essential oils (EOs), also called secondary metabolites, are volatile liquids with a strong odour obtained from various aromatic plant parts. EOs contain diverse bioactive compounds generated by plants to protect themselves against pathogens and insects [1, 2]. The bioactive compounds possess a wide range of biological activities such as toxicity and repellence to insects, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer and antimalarial [3-6]. Since EOs are mixture of different bioactive compounds, those with proven larvicidal and adulticidal properties were assumed to offer less chance of resistance development in mosquito vectors and could be an alternative to synthetic insecticides [7].

In Benin, vector-borne infectious diseases, such as malaria, acquired through the bite of an infected female arthropod, are still a major public health concern. Mass distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) with chemical insecticides are the main strategies implemented in malaria vector control programs [8, 9]. Unfortunately, vectors resistance to the different classes of insecticides currently used in public health (pyrethroids, carbamates, and organophosphates) could jeopardize the vector control interventions [10]. Indeed, several studies have reported that natural mosquito populations in Benin showed resistance to pyrethroids, DDT, carbamates and organophosphates insecticides [11, 12]. In addition, N'guessan et al. [13] have demonstrated that, pyrethroid resistance in the primary malaria vector *An. gambiae* was threatening the effectiveness of ITN and IRS in the areas of high resistance in Benin. The widespread of the insecticide resistance phenomenon in addition to the environmental pollution from chemical insecticides and its high operational cost have led to the need to develop alternative malaria control approaches. Developing effective and eco-friendly tools for reducing the burden or eliminating malaria is highly recommended in this context.

The plant extracts properties as insecticide, repellent or fumigant against mosquitoes and other pests and insect vectors have been well reported. Especially, EOs of several plants have been shown to exhibit significant insecticidal and repellent properties against adult mosquitoes [14-16], as well as against mosquito larvae [17-20]. Therefore, it is worth investigating the Beninese flora to find out the plant species whose essential oils could display insecticidal activity against malaria vectors. The grass genus *Euclasta* Franch (Poaceae) comprises two species, *Euclasta clarkei* (Hack.) Cope which is distributed in South-western Asia, and *Euclasta condylotricha* (Steud) (*Eu. condolytricha*) which is found in Africa, southern Asia and America [21]. *Eu. condolytricha*, also known as *Andropogon condylotrichus*, is an annual species, and the height of mature plants can reach up to 2 meters [22]. To our knowledge, there is no report on the chemical constituents of *Eu. condyloticha* essential oil nor its insecticidal activity. Considering the concerted efforts to develop plant products-based insecticides as an excellent alternative to synthetic insecticides, the current study aims to: (i) investigate the chemical profile of the essential oils obtained from *Eu. condyloticha* flowers harvested in Benin; (ii) evaluate the larvicidal activity of the EOs on *Anopheles gambiae* s.s. mosquitoes.

## Experimental

### Plant material and extraction

*Euclasta condyloticha* Steud flowers (Fig 1) were collected in November 2018 from the localities of Ouessè (middle) (8°38'19.3"N, 2°38'04.7"E), Parakou (northeast) (9°22'55.2"N, 2°36'48.1"E) and Sinendé (north-west) (10°06'52.7"N, 2°22'58.7"E) of Benin Republic. The taxonomic identification of the plants was carried out at the ‘Laboratoire de Botanique et Écologie Végétale (LaBEV) of the University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin, and the voucher specimens are
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 1.** *Euclasta condylotricha* Steud harvested in Benin. A: The whole plant with stem, leaves and flowers. B: Areal part of the plant showing the flowers.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834.g001

kept at the National Herbarium of the University. The voucher specimen numbers are AAC 190/HNB, AAC 191/HNB and AAC 192/HNB respectively for samples from Ouessè, Parakou and Sinendé.

The collected flowers were dried at 25°C ±2°C for 72 hours. Three batches of 100 g of dried flowers were submitted to hydro-distillation in the Clevenger apparatus at 100°C for 150 min. The distilled oil was dried using anhydrous sodium sulphate, transferred into an airtight amber-colored vial, and stored at 4°C until further use. The yields were averaged over the three extraction experiments per plant material.

## Analysis of volatile compounds

The chemical composition of the EOs was evaluated by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) according to a methodology previously reported [23]. Compounds identifications were performed using published data [24] and a comparison with the NIST mass spectral library.

## Mosquito strains

Three *An. gambiae* s.s. laboratory strains (Kisumu, Acerkis and Kiskdr) from the insectary of the laboratory of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases at the Institut Régional de Santé Publique Alfred Quenum (IRSP-AQ) of the University of Abomey-Calavi in Ouidah (Benin) were used in this study. Kisumu strain originating from Kenya is a reference strain susceptible to all insecticides [25]. Acerkis, resistant to organophosphate and carbamate-based insecticides, is homozygous for (G119S) mutation [26]. Kiskdr is homozygous for *kdr*^R (L1014F) allele and confers resistance to pyrethroids and DDT [27]. Both AcerKis and Kiskdr were supposed to share the same genetic background as the Kisumu strain but differ by the presence of resistance alleles. The colonies of the three strains were maintained in the insectary under optimum conditions (25-27°C temperature, 70-80% relative humidity and 12:12 light and dark period).

## Larval bioassay

Third instar larvae of each mosquito strain were used for the bioassays. Bioassays were performed according to the standard method recommended by the World Health Organization
as previously described in [23], using seven concentrations of each EO sample as follow: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 ppm.

## Data analysis

The analysis of dose-mortality responses in larval bioassays was performed using the BioRsay script version 6.2 [32] in R software Version 3.0 [33]. This script calculates the mortality-dose regression using a generalised linear model (GLM). To assess the adequacy of the model, a chi-square test between the observed dead numbers and the dead numbers predicted by the regression is used. Using a likelihood ratio test (LRT), it also tests whether the mortality-dose regressions are similar for the different strains, using a likelihood ratio test (LRT). If there are more than two strains test, it also computes the pairwise test and corrects it using sequential Bonferroni correction [28]. Finally, it computes the lethal concentrations inducing 50% (LC₅₀) and 95% (LC₉₅) mortality recorded in each mosquito strain and the associated confidence intervals; the resistance ratios, i.e. RR₅₀ or RR₉₅ (LC₅₀ or LC₉₅ in each strain, divided respectively by the LC₅₀ or LC₉₅ of the reference strain) and their 95% confidence intervals. Susceptible or resistant status was defined according to Mazzarri & Georghiou [29] and Bisset et al. [30] criteria: RR₅₀≤1 and RR₅₀>1 indicate respectively susceptibility and phenotypic resistance response against the essential oil.

## Results and discussion

### Essential oils chemical composition

This study characterised the EOs chemical composition of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers harvested in three localities (Ouessè, Parakou and Sinendé) of the Benin Republic. The dried flowers of *Eu. condylotricha* were hydrodistilled and produced an EOs with a characteristic odour. The extractions yields were 0.097%, 0.070% and 0.085%, respectively for EOs from Ouessè, Parakou and Sinendé plant samples.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) applied to the EOs revealed fifty-five (55) chemical constituents, representing 94.95% to 97.78% of the total essential oils (Table 1). However, four compounds have not been identified, including one compound common to the three EO samples (1.27 to 2.12%) and three compounds in EO from Sinendé (0.31% to 1.69%). The EO sample from Sinendé contained forty-four (44) compounds representing 95.86% of the oil. Forty (40) chemical constituents were identified in the EO from Parakou, accounting for 94.95% of the essential oil's mass. The lowest number of phytochemicals, thirty-five (35) components, representing 95.86% of all the compounds, was recorded in the EO from Ouessè. There was a wide range of variations in EOs constituents. Each of the three EOs was dominated by juvenile hormones. Indeed, the primary class of components identified was juvenile hormones with 74.87%, 61.29% and 54.92%, respectively in EOs samples from Ouessè, Parakou and Sinendé. Among the juvenile hormones, the most abundant chemical constituents were the juvenile hormone C16 (48.72% in EO from Ouessè; 35.97% in EO from Sinendé; and 32.08% in EO from Parakou), followed by methyl farnesoate 10,11-diol (28.73%, 25.67%, and 18.56% respectively in EO from Parakou, Ouessè, and Sinendé) (Table 1). The sesquiterpenes were the second representative class of components identified in three EOs samples. The major group of sesquiterpenes was the hydrocarbons sesquiterpenes (15.17% in Ouessè, 27.77% in Parakou and 15.36% in Sinendé), while the oxygenated sesquiterpenes accounted for 1.66% in Ouessè, 2.23% in Parakou and 21.44% in Sinendé. The hydrocarbons sesquiterpene β-eudesmene was found in EO from Parakou (24.12%), Ouessè (13.36%), and Sinendé (12.75%). Among the oxygenated sesquiterpenes, the major compound was Tau-cadinol (18.54%), found mainly in the EO from Sinendé (Table 1).
<table><caption>Table 1. Chemical composition of the *Euclasta condylotricha* Steud essential oils.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">No</th><th rowspan="2">Rt</th><th rowspan="2">Compounds</th><th colspan="3">Percentage of total composition</th></tr><tr><th>Ouessè</th><th>Parakou</th><th>Sinendé</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>13.87</td><td>α-Pinene</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>15.08</td><td>β-Myrcene</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>17.08</td><td>o-Cymene</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>17.36</td><td>β-Terpinyl acetate</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>22.5</td><td>Linalool</td><td>-</td><td>0.15</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>26.76</td><td>trans-Borneol</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>26.8</td><td>3-Pinanylamine</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>27.6</td><td>Terpinen-4-ol</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>28.59</td><td>L-α-Terpineol</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>28.93</td><td>n-Hexyl butanoate</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>29.2</td><td>trans-2-Hexenyl Butyrate</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>32.97</td><td>2-Methylbutyl caproate</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>41.67</td><td>(-)-β-Elemene</td><td>0.72</td><td>1.15</td><td>1.02</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>41.93</td><td>(2Z)-2-Hexenyl butyrate</td><td>tr</td><td>0.15</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>42.73</td><td>β-Gurjunene</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>43.19</td><td>β-Caryophyllene</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>44.5</td><td>L-Alloaromadendrene</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>45.28</td><td>α-Humulene</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.23</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>45.43</td><td>E.E-8.10-Dodecadien-1-ol</td><td>-</td><td>0.22</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>45.52</td><td>α-Selinene</td><td>0.16</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>46.08</td><td>1,6-Dimethylhepta-1,3,5-triene</td><td>1.03</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.84</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>46.73</td><td>(+)-Aromadendrene</td><td>0.11</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td><strong>47.32</strong></td><td><strong>β-Eudesmene</strong></td><td><strong>13.46</strong></td><td><strong>24.12</strong></td><td><strong>12.75</strong></td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>47.83</td><td>γ-Gurjunene</td><td>0.94</td><td>2.45</td><td>1.18</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>48.4</td><td>Aciphyllene</td><td>0.13</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.16</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td>49</td><td>γ-Cadinene</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.56</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td>49.12</td><td>(-)-α-Panasinsene</td><td>tr</td><td>0.14</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>49.63</td><td>NI</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.31</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>50.38</td><td>α-Cadinene</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td>51.15</td><td>Elemol</td><td>0.13</td><td>tr</td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><td>31</td><td>52.02</td><td>Geranyl isobutyrate</td><td>-</td><td>0.10</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>32</td><td>52.12</td><td>D-Nerolidol</td><td>0.11</td><td>-</td><td>0.26</td></tr><tr><td>33</td><td>52.53</td><td>β-copaene</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>34</td><td>52.63</td><td>(+)-Spathulenol</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td>52.87</td><td>β-Caryophyllene oxide</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>36</td><td>53.41</td><td>Epiglobulol</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.42</td></tr><tr><td>37</td><td>53.88</td><td>Ledol</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>38</td><td>54.66</td><td>(-)-Neointermedeol</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.28</td></tr><tr><td>39</td><td>54.79</td><td>Epicubenol</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.23</td></tr><tr><td>40</td><td>55.10</td><td>7-epi-cis-sesquisabinene hydrate</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>41</td><td>55.12</td><td>Germacrene D-4-ol</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>42</td><td>55.54</td><td>Di-epi-1,10-cubenol</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>43</td><td>55.74</td><td>(-)-β-Longipinene</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>44</td><td><strong>56.36</strong></td><td><strong>tau.-Cadinol</strong></td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td><strong>18.54</strong></td></tr><tr><td>45</td><td>56.67</td><td>β-Eudesmol</td><td>tr</td><td>0.10</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>46</td><td>56.98</td><td>Globulol</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.96</td><td>1.08</td></tr></tbody></table>

(Continued)
<table><caption>**Table 1.** (Continued)</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">No</th><th rowspan="2">Rt</th><th rowspan="2">Compounds</th><th colspan="3">Percentage of total composition</th></tr><tr><th>Ouessè</th><th>Parakou</th><th>Sinendé</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>47</td><td>58.89</td><td>Shyobunol</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>48</td><td>62.59</td><td>NI</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>0.49</td></tr><tr><td>49</td><td><strong>64.27</strong></td><td><strong>Methyl farnesoate 10.11-diol</strong></td><td><strong>25.67</strong></td><td><strong>28.73</strong></td><td><strong>18.56</strong></td></tr><tr><td>50</td><td>66.58</td><td>2,3-Dimethylpentanal</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td><td>tr</td></tr><tr><td>51</td><td>66.99</td><td>Juvenile hormone C18</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.39</td></tr><tr><td>52</td><td><strong>68.36</strong></td><td><strong>Juvenile hormone C16</strong></td><td><strong>48.72</strong></td><td><strong>32.08</strong></td><td><strong>35.97</strong></td></tr><tr><td>53</td><td>68.55</td><td>NI</td><td>2.12</td><td>1.27</td><td>1.56</td></tr><tr><td>54</td><td>69.23</td><td>NI</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>1.69</td></tr><tr><td>55</td><td>69.93</td><td>trans-Z-α-Bisabolene epoxide</td><td>0.69</td><td>0.46</td><td>0.53</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Oxygenated monoterpenes</strong></td><td><strong>0.54</strong></td><td><strong>1.3</strong></td><td><strong>0.9</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons</strong></td><td><strong>15.17</strong></td><td><strong>27.77</strong></td><td><strong>15.36</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Oxygenated sesquiterpenes</strong></td><td><strong>1.66</strong></td><td><strong>2.23</strong></td><td><strong>21.44</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Juvenile hormones</strong></td><td><strong>74.87</strong></td><td><strong>61.29</strong></td><td><strong>54.92</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Others</strong></td><td><strong>3.62</strong></td><td><strong>2.49</strong></td><td><strong>5.29</strong></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><strong>Total identified (%)</strong></td><td><strong>95.86</strong></td><td><strong>94.95</strong></td><td><strong>97.78</strong></td></tr></tbody></table>

Compounds are listed in order of elution from a HP-5MS column. Rt: retention times; tr: trace amount (<0.1%); (-): not detected; NI: not identified.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834.t001

The EOs analysed in this study were enriched in juvenile hormones. These compounds were known as insect hormones involved in vital physiological processes in larvae and adult insects [31, 32]. However, to date, only two studies reported the presence of juvenile hormones in plant extracts. The first by Toong *et al.*, [33] in the whole plants of *Cyperus iria* L and *C. aromaticus* Ridl. These authors showed that the excess of the juvenile hormone could distort the wings, change the colour, and induce infertility in adult migratory grasshopper *Melanoplus sanguinipes* females. The second study has shown the existence of juvenile hormone in aqueous methanolic extract of *Cananga latifolia* stem bark [34]. Moreover, juvenile hormones were reported to affect the development of nematodes and represent valuable phytocompounds for insect pest control [31, 35].

We observed a significant variation in the yield and composition of the essential oils of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers collected in three different localities in the Benin Republic. This variation can be attributed to the different environmental conditions, such as altitude, solar exposure, and soil composition [36]. Such variations in EOs yield and phytochemical constituents dependent on the plant's geographical area have been reported for several other plant species, demonstrating that distinct plants from different locations display different chemotypes [37, 38].

The current study is the first work on *Eu. condylotricha* (Poaceae) flowers' EOs composition. However, several studies have been carried out on the chemical composition of essential oils from other plants of the Poaceae family. Indeed, it was shown that the essential oils of *Bothriochloa* spp.; *Cymbopogon* spp. and *Chrysopogon zizanioides* are dominated by the presence of sesquiterpenes [39–42]. As sesquiterpenes have been found as major constituents of the EOs analysed in this study, EOs from the Poaceae family is enriched in sesquiterpenes.

## Larvicidal activity

For several decades, plant derivatives like EOs from aromatic plants have been screened for effective larvicidal activities against *An. gambiae* larvae [43–45]. The EOs of *Eu. condylotricha*
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig 2.** Percentage of dead *An. gambiae* larvae after 24 h exposition at different concentrations of EOs. 0 ppm indicates control solution with water and ethanol without EO.</figcaption></figure>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834.g002

flowers were tested against third instar larvae of two resistant (Kiskdr, Acerkis) and one susceptible (Kisumu) laboratory strains of *An. gambiae*.

The larvicidal activity of the EOs under a series of concentrations ranging from 10 to 70 ppm were evaluated. As shown in Fig 2, toxicity of the three EOs is concentration-dependent. The EOs exhibited significant larvicidal activity, with LC₅₀ values ranging from 35.21 to 52.34 ppm (Table 2) after 24 hours of exposure. The EO sample from Sinendé was the most active, with LC₅₀ of 35.21 ppm on Kiskdr larvae, followed by the EO from Ouessè with LC₅₀ of 38.10 ppm and 38.46 ppm on Acerkis and Kisumu larvae, respectively.

Acerkis strain larvae (LC₅₀ = 38.10 ppm) were significantly more susceptible to EO from Ouessè compared to Kiskdr (LC₅₀ = 46.30 ppm, *p* < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed compared to Kisumu larvae (LC₅₀ = 38.46 ppm, *p* = 0.33). However, for the Sinendé sample, Kisumu and Kiskdr larvae susceptibility was significantly different (*p* < 0.001). The LC₅₀ value recorded in Kiskdr larvae (35.21 ppm) was significantly lower than that in Acerkis (44.45 ppm, *p* < 0.001) and Kisumu larvae (52.34 ppm, *p* < 0.001).

This is the first report on the larvicidal activity of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers OEs against *An. gambiae* larvae. In agreement with the criteria established by Cheng *et al.*, [46] plant EOs showing LC₅₀ values < 50 ppm within 24 hours were very active, and LC₅₀ (24h) values < 100 ppm were declared active. Based on those classifications, *Eu. condylotricha* flowers EOs could represent an inexpensive and environmentally benign agent for controlling malaria vectors.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Toxicity against *An. gambiae* larvae after 24 h exposure.</caption><thead><tr><th>EOs samples</th><th>Strains</th><th>LC<sub>50</sub> (ppm)</th><th>95% C.I</th><th>RR<sub>50</sub></th><th>95% CI [LCL-UCL]</th><th>LC<sub>95</sub> (ppm)</th><th>95% CI [LCL-UCL]</th><th>Slope ±S.E</th><th>Intercept ±S.E</th><th>Chi(p) value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4">Ouessè</td><td>Kisumu</td><td>38.46</td><td>36.94-39.96</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>74.45</td><td>69.65-80.67</td><td>5.73 ± 0.45</td><td>-9.09 ± 0.47</td><td>0.98</td></tr><tr><td>Acerkis</td><td>38.10</td><td>36.43-39.75</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.86-1.14</td><td>79.33</td><td>73.42-87.20</td><td>5.16 ± 0.28</td><td>-8.16 ± 0.45</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>Kiskdr</td><td>46.30</td><td>44.15-48.59</td><td>1.20</td><td>1.04-1.38</td><td>92.05</td><td>83.43-104.65</td><td>5.51 ± 0.38</td><td>-9.18 ± 0.63</td><td>0.71</td></tr><tr><td>Kisumu</td><td>48.06</td><td>45.99-50.31</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>108.81</td><td>98.07-124.02</td><td>4.63 ± 0.27</td><td>-7.79 ± 0.45</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Parakou</td><td>Acerkis</td><td>40.25</td><td>38.09-42.55</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.73-0.95</td><td>92.20</td><td>82.94-105.51</td><td>4.57 ± 0.29</td><td>-7.33 ± 0.48</td><td>0.64</td></tr><tr><td>Kiskdr</td><td>47.41</td><td>45.36-49.60</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.87-1.21</td><td>102.88</td><td>93.09-116.72</td><td>4.88 ± 0.29</td><td>-8.19 ± 0.49</td><td>0.59</td></tr><tr><td>Kisumu</td><td>52.34</td><td>50.36-54.50</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>100.72</td><td>92.10-112.85</td><td>5.78 ± 0.35</td><td>-9.94 ± 0.6</td><td>0.69</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Sinendé</td><td>Acerkis</td><td>44.45</td><td>42.23-46.79</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.74-0.97</td><td>93.49</td><td>84.18-107.20</td><td>5.09 ± 0.35</td><td>-8.4 ± 0.58</td><td>0.45</td></tr><tr><td>Kiskdr</td><td>35.21</td><td>31.61-38.63</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.59-0.77</td><td>103.31</td><td>85.28-138.55</td><td>3.51 ± 0.38</td><td>-5.44 ± 0.61</td><td>0.44</td></tr></tbody></table>

No mortality was observed in the control

LC₅₀/₉₅: lethal concentrations; S.E: standard error; C.I: Confidence interval; RR₅₀ is resistance ratio at LC₅₀: LC₅₀ (resistant strain)/ LC₅₀ (Kisumu). LCL: Lower confidence limit; UCL: Upper confidence limit

Chi(p) is indicated to judge whether the data are well fitted to the regression or not. The fits are acceptable when the p-value is over 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278834.t002
The RR₅₀< 1 suggests that the pyrethroid-resistant (Kiskdr) and the carbamate/organophosphate resistant (Acerkis) mosquito strains were susceptible to the *Eu. condylotricha* flowers essential oils, except Kiskdr strain to the sample from Ouessè. This finding indicates that the presence of insecticide resistance mutations (L1014F in Kiskdr and G119S in Acerkis) did not induce a cross-resistance to the EO extracts. Although, there were no previous studies on the larvicidal activity of *Eu. condylotricha* flowers EO, some EOs from the plants of the Poaceae family with proven bioactivity against *Anopheles* species larvae have been reported [47–49]. The larvicidal effect of *Eu. condylotricha* EOs might be caused by the secondary metabolites contained in the OEs. The high amount of juvenile hormones and other sesquiterpenes could be the basis of the observed larvicidal activity. Indeed, several ethnobotanical studies have reported that many sesquiterpene-rich EOs demonstrated excellent larvicidal activities. This is the case of *Murraya exotica* EO with 61.5% of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and 6.01% of oxygenated sesquiterpenes that exhibited strong larvicidal activity against *Anopheles stephensi* larvae (LC₅₀ = 31.3 ppm) [50]; *Zingiber nimmoni* EO that contains 51.9% of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and 16.2% of oxygenated sesquiterpenes which showed high larvicidal activity against *Anopheles stephensi* larvae (LC₅₀ = 41.2 ppm) [51]; and *Chloroxylon swietenia* EO that has 53.9% of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and 3.0% of oxygenated sesquiterpenes which was very active on *Anopheles stephensi* larvae (LC₅₀ = 14.9 ppm) [52]. Moreover, some sesquiterpenes exhibited larvicidal activity against mosquito larvae. Sesquiterpenes such as humulene (LC₅₀ = 6.19 ppm); caryophylene (LC₅₀ = 41.66 ppm); elemene (LC₅₀ = 10.26 ppm); germacrene D-4-ol (LC₅₀ = 6.12 ppm) and α-cadinol (LC₅₀ = 10.27 ppm) were demonstrated to be toxic to *Anopheles subpictus* larvae [51, 53]. Caryophyllene oxide (LC₅₀ = 49.81 ppm) and germacrene D (LC₅₀ = 49.46 ppm) were also shown toxic to *Anopheles anthropophagus* larvae [54].

**Conclusion**

Local plant derivatives with insecticidal properties constitute a promising alternative for
malaria vector control. The EOs of *Eu. condylotricha* samples collected in different regions of
Benin Republic were analyzed and found to contain high concentrations of sesquiterpenoid
compounds. The juvenile hormone C16 was the major constituent of the phytochemical com-
pounds of all EOs samples. The first report of this hormone in *Eu. condylotricha* provides solid
background for a wide range of applications for malaria control. The OEs showed significant
larvicidal activity against resistant *An. gambiae* strains. Before translating these research find-
ings into operational interventions, further investigations on mechanisms by which EOs medi-
ate their bioinsecticidal activity may require evaluations of the major EOs' constituents
separately. This study findings contribute to the dissemination of knowledge regarding the
chemical composition and larvicidal activity of this Beninese plant species, which is almost
incipient in the literature.

**Supporting information**

S1 File. Larval bioassay raw data.
(XLSX)

S2 File. Representative GC-MS chromatogram of *Eu. Condylotricha* flowers essential oils. (DOCX)

**Author Contributions**

**Conceptualization:** Roméo Barnabé Bohounton, Pierre Villeneuve, Luc Salako Djogbénou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo.
**Data curation:** Roméo Barnabé Bohounton, Oswald Yédjinnavênan Djihinto, Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome, Réné Mahudro Yovo, Laurette Djossou, Koffi Koba, Aristide Adomou.

**Formal analysis:** Roméo Barnabé Bohounton.

**Supervision:** Fidèle Paul Tchobo.

**Writing – original draft:** Roméo Barnabé Bohounton.

**Writing – review & editing:** Roméo Barnabé Bohounton, Oswald Yédjinnavênan Djihinto, Oronce Sedjro-Ludolphe Dedome, Luc Salako Djogbénou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo.

## References

1. Lee S-H, Do H-S, Min K-J. Effects of Essential Oil from Hinoki Cypress, Chamaecyparis obtusa, on Physiology and Behavior of Flies. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0143450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143450 PMID: 26624577

2. Isman MB, Machial CM, Miresmailli S, Bainard LD. Essential Oil-Based Pesticides: New Insights from Old Chemistry. Pesticide Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007. pp. 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527611249.ch21

3. Muthiah C, Prabhakaran V, Sengottayan S-N, Karthi S, Vel T, Athirstam P, et al. Botanical essential oils and uses as mosquitocides and repellents against dengue. Environment International. 2017; 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.038 PMID: 29453089

4. Valdivieso-Ugarte M, Gomez-Llorente C, Plaza-Díaz J, Gil Á. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Immuno-modulatory Properties of Essential Oils: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2019; 11: 2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112786 PMID: 31731683

5. Lesgards J, Baldovini N, Vidal N, Pietri S. Anticancer Activities of Essential Oils Constituents and Syn-ergy with Conventional Therapies: A Review. Phytotherapy Research. 2014; 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5165 PMID: 24831562

6. Milhau G, Valentin A, Benoit F, Mallié M, Bastide J-M, Pélissier Y, et al. In Vitro Antimalarial Activity of Eight Essential Oils. Journal of Essential Oil Research. 2012; 9: 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1997.10554252

7. Sarma R, Adhikari K, Mahanta S, Khanikor B. Combinations of Plant Essential Oil Based Terpene Compounds as Larvicidal and Adulticidal Agent against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45908-3 PMID: 31263222

8. Carnevale P, Robert V. Les anophèles: Biologie, transmission du Plasmodium et lutte antivectorielle. IRD Éditions; 2009. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irditions.10374

9. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. 2020 p. 299. Available: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240015791

10. Soonwera M, Phasomkusolsil S. Adulticidal, larvicidal, pupicidal and oviposition deterrent activities of essential oil from Zanthoxylum limonella Alston (Rutaceae) against Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2017; 7: 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.09.019

11. Benoît A, Djogbenou L, Saizonou J, Milesi P, Djossou L, Djegbe I, et al. Phenotypic effects of concomitant insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) and knockdown resistance (kdrR) in Anopheles gambiae: a hindrance for insecticide resistance management for malaria vector control. Parasites & Vectors. 2014; 7: 548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0548-9 PMID: 25471264

12. Fr A, V G, R A, R A, N A, A S, et al. Impact of Insecticide Resistance on the Effectiveness of Pyrethroid-Based Malaria Vectors Control Tools in Benin: Decreased Toxicity and Repellent Effect. PloS one. 2015; 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145207 PMID: 26674643

13. N'Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbéto M, Rowland M. Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13: 199–206. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1302.060631 PMID: 17479880

14. Bassolé IHN, Guelbeogo WM, Nébié R, Costantini C, Sagnon N, Kabore ZI, et al. Ovicidal and larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes of essential oils extracted from three spontaneous plants of Burkina Faso. Parassitologia. 2003; 45: 23–26. PMID: 15270540

15. Nonviho G, Wotto V, Noudogbessi J-P, Avlessi F, Akogbeto M, Sohounhloue D. Insecticidal activities of essential oils extracted from three species of poaceae on Anopheles gambiaespp, major vector of
malaria. Scientific Study & Research Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, Food Industry. 2010; 11.

16. Seyoum A, Kabiru EW, Lwande W, Killeen GF, Hassanali A, Knols BGJ. Repellency of live potted plants against Anopheles gambiae from human baits in semi-field experimental huts. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 67: 191–195. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2002.67.191 PMID: 12389946

17. Tchoumbougnang F, Dongmo PMJ, Lambert M, Mbanjo EGN, Fotso GBT, Henri P, et al. Activité larvicide sur Anopheles gambiae Giles et composition chimique des huiles essentielles extraites de quatre plantes cultivées au Cameroun. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2009; 8.

18. Madhu SK, Shaukath AK, Vijayan VA. Efficacy of bioactive compounds from Curcuma aromatica against mosquito larvae. Acta Trop. 2010; 113: 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.08.023 PMID: 19712662

19. Kweka EJ, Nyindo M, Mosha F, Silva AG. Insecticidal activity of the essential oil from fruits and seeds of Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi against African malaria vectors. Parasites & Vectors. 2011; 4: 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-129 PMID: 21729280

20. Kalaivani K, Senthil-Nathan S, Murugesan AG. Biological activity of selected Lamiaceae and Zingiberaceae plant essential oils against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res. 2012; 110: 1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2623-x PMID: 21881945

21. Piątek M, Lutz M, Yorou N. A molecular phylogenetic framework for Anthracocystis (Ustilaginales), including five new combinations (inter alia for the asexual Pseudozyma flocculosa), and description of Anthracocystis grodzinskae sp. nov. Mycological Progress. 2015; 14: 88 (pages 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1114-3

22. Akoègninou A, Van der Burg WJ, Van der Maesen LJG. Flore analytique du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers; 2006.

23. Bohounton RB, Djogbénou LS, Djihinto OY, Dedome OS-L, Sovegnon PM, Barea B, et al. Chemical composition and the insecticidal activity of Aeollanthus pubescens leaf essential oil against Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Parasites Vectors. 2021; 14: 518. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05012-w PMID: 34620224

24. Adams RP, Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy. Carol Stream, Ill.: Allured Pub. Corp.; 2004.

25. Shute GT. A Method of Maintaining Colonies of East African Strains of Anopheles Gambiae. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 1956; 50: 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1956.11685743 PMID: 13303106

26. Djogbénou L, Weill M, Hougard JM, Raymond M, Akogbéto M, Chandre F. Characterization of insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): resistance levels and dominance. J Med Entomol. 2007; 44: 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[805: coiaai]2.0.co;2 PMID: 17915512

27. Alout H, Ndam NT, Sandeu MM, Djégbe I, Chandre F, Dabiré RK, et al. Insecticide resistance alleles affect vector competence of Anopheles gambiae s.s. for Plasmodium falciparum field isolates. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e63849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063849 PMID: 23704944

28. Milesi P, Labbé P. BioRSSay: A R Script for Bioassay Analyses v. 6.2. Montpellier, France; 2015. Available: http://wwwisemunivmontp2.fr/recherche/equipes/genomiquedeladaptation/personnel/labbe-pierrick/

29. Mazzarri MB, Georghiou GP. Characterization of resistance to organophosphate, carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides in field populations of Aedes aegypti from Venezuela. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995; 11: 315–322. PMID: 8551300

30. Bisset JA, Rodríguez MM, Ricardo Y, Ranson H, Pérez O, Moya M, et al. Temephos resistance and esterase activity in the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Havana, Cuba increased dramatically between 2006 and 2008. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2011; 25: 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00959.x PMID: 21501201

31. Goodman WG, Cusson M. 8—The Juvenile Hormones. In: Gilbert LI, editor. Insect Endocrinology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 310–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384749-2.10008-1

32. Roussel J-P. Activité comparée des hormones juvéniles en C-18 (JH-I) et en C-16 (JH-III) chez Locusta migratoria. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1976; 22: 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(76)90274-2

33. Toong YC, Schooley DA, Baker FC. Isolation of insect juvenile hormone III from a plant. Nature. 1988; 333: 170–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/333170a0

34. Yang H, Kim HS, Jeong EJ, Khiev P, Chin Y-W, Sung SH. Plant-derived juvenile hormone III analogues and other sesquiterpenes from the stem bark of Cananga latifolia. Phytochemistry. 2013; 94: 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.06.010 PMID: 23859262
35. Bede JC, Tobe SS. Insect Juvenile Hormones in Plants. In: Atta-ur-Rahman, editor. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. Elsevier; 2000. pp. 369–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-5995(00)80031-9

36. Figueiredo AC, Barroso JG, Pedro LG, Scheffer JJC. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: volatile components and essential oils. Flavour and Fragrance Journal. 2008; 23: 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1875

37. Saei-Dehkordi SS, Tajik H, Moradi M, Khalighi-Sigaroodi F. Chemical composition of essential oils in Zataria multiflora Boiss. from different parts of Iran and their radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2010; 48: 1562–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.03.025 PMID: 20332011

38. Yayi-Ladekan E, Kpoviessi SSD, Gbaguidi F, Kpadonou-Kpoviessi BGH, Gbénou JD, Jolivalt C, et al. Variation diurne de la composition chimique et influence sur les propriétés antimicrobiennes de l'huile essentielle d'Ocimum canum Sims cultivée au Bénin. Phytothérapie. 2012; 10: 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10298-012-0715-4

39. Scrivanti LR, Anton AM, Zygadlo JA. Essential oil composition of Bothriochloa Kuntze (Poaceae) from South America and their chemotaxonomy. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2009; 37: 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2009.03.009

40. Verma RS, Singh S, Padalia RC, Tandon S, Kt V, Chauhan A. Essential oil composition of the sub-aerial parts of eight species of Cymbopogon (Poaceae). Industrial Crops and Products. 2019; 142: 111839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111839

41. Santana Campos RN de, Nascimento Lima CB, Passos Oliveira A, Albano Araújo AP, Fitzgerald Blank A, Barreto Alves P, et al. Acaricidal properties of vetiver essential oil from Chrysopogon zizanioides (Poaceae) against the tick species Amblyomma cajennense and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Veterinary Parasitology. 2015; 212: 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.08.022 PMID: 26359641

42. Assaeed A, Elshamy A, El Gendy AE-N, Dar B, Al-Rowaily S, Abd-ElGawad A. Sesquiterpenes-Rich Essential Oil from Above Ground Parts of Pulicaria somalensis Exhibited Antioxidant Activity and Allelo-pathic Effect on Weeds. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030399

43. Gnankiné O, Bassolé IHN. Essential Oils as an Alternative to Pyrethroids' Resistance against Anopheles Species Complex Giles (Diptera: Culicidae). Molecules. 2017; 22: E1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22101321 PMID: 28937642

44. Osanloo M, Sedaghat MM, Sanei-Dehkordi A, Amani A. Plant-Derived Essential Oils; Their Larvicidal Properties and Potential Application for Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases. Galen Med J. 2019; 8: e1532. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v8i0.1532 PMID: 34466524

45. Dantanko F, Malann YD. Bioactivity of Essential Oils of Laggera pterodonta and Laggera aurita against Larvae of Anopheles gambiae, Malaria Vector. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2020; 4: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08651

46. Cheng S-S, Chang H-T, Chang S-T, Tsai K-H, Chen W-J. Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti larvae. Bioresource Technology. 2003; 89: 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00008-7 PMID: 12676507

47. Govindarajan M. Larvicidal and repellent properties of some essential oils against Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles and Anopheles subpictus Grassi (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2011; 4: 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60047-3 PMID: 21771431

48. Tchoumbougnang F, Jazet Dongmo PM, Lambert Sameza M, Nkouaya Mbanjo EG, Tiako Fotso GB, Amvam Zollo PH, et al. Activité larvicide sur Anopheles gambiae Giles et composition chimique des huiles essentielles extraites de quatre plantes cultivées au Cameroun. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2009 [cited 9 Feb 2022]. Available: http://popups.ulg.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=3547&lang=en

49. Manimaran A, Cruz MMJJ, Muthu C, Vincent S, Ignacimuthu S. Larvicidal and knockdown effects of some essential oils against *Culex quinquefasciatus* Say, *Aedes aegypti* (L.) and *Anopheles stephensi* (Liston). 2012; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2012.37106

50. Krishnamoorthy S, Chandrasekaran M, Raj A, Mahalingam J, Venkatesalu V. Identification of chemical constituents and larvicidal activity of essential oil from Murraya exotica L. (Rutaceae) against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitology research. 2015; 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4370-x PMID: 25697880

51. Govindarajan M, Rajeswary M, Arivoli S, Tennyson S, Benelli G. Larvicidal and repellent potential of Zingiber nimmonii (J. Graham) Dalzell (Zingiberaceae) essential oil: an eco-friendly tool against malaria, dengue, and lymphatic filariasis mosquito vectors? Parasitol Res. 2016; 115: 1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-4920-x PMID: 26792432

52. Ravi Kiran S, Bhavani K, Sita Devi P, Rajeswara Rao BR, Janardhan Reddy K. Composition and larvicidal activity of leaves and stem essential oils of Chloroxylon swietenia DC against Aedes aegypti and
Anopheles stephensi. Bioresource Technology. 2006; 97: 2481–2484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.003 PMID: 16815011

53. Pavela R. Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015; 76: 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.050

54. Zhu L, Tian Y. Chemical composition and larvicidal activity of essential oil of Artemisia gilvescens against Anopheles anthropophagus. Parasitol Res. 2013; 112: 1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3243-9 PMID: 23263328