# Anionic N18 Macrocycles and a Polynitrogen Double Helix in Novel Yttrium Polynitrides YN6 and Y2N11 at 100 GPa

Andrey Aslandukov, Florian Trybel, Alena Aslandukova, Dominique Laniel, Timofey Fedotenko, Saiana Khandarkhaeva, Georgios Aprilis, Carlotta Giacobbe, Eleanor Lawrence Bright, Igor A. Abrikosov, et al.

► To cite this version:

Andrey Aslandukov, Florian Trybel, Alena Aslandukova, Dominique Laniel, Timofey Fedotenko, et al. Anionic N18 Macrocycles and a Polynitrogen Double Helix in Novel Yttrium Polynitrides YN6 and Y2N11 at 100 GPa. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2022, 61 (34), pp.e202207469. 10.1002/anie.202207469. hal-05074749

HAL Id: hal-05074749

https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05074749v1

Submitted on 20 May 2025

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Anionic N₁₈ Macrocycles and a Polynitrogen Double Helix in Novel Yttrium Polynitrides YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ at 100 GPa

Andrey Aslandukov,* Florian Trybel, Alena Aslandukova, Dominique Laniel, Timofey Fedotenko, Saiana Khandarkhaeva, Georgios Aprilis, Carlotta Giacobbe, Eleanor Lawrence Bright, Igor A. Abrikosov, Leonid Dubrovinsky, and Natalia Dubrovinskaia

**Abstract:** Two novel yttrium nitrides, YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁, were synthesized by direct reaction between yttrium and nitrogen at 100 GPa and 3000 K in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell. High-pressure synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction revealed that the crystal structures of YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ feature a unique organization of nitrogen atoms—a previously unknown anionic N₁₈ macrocycle and a polynitrogen double helix, respectively. Density functional theory calculations, confirming the dynamical stability of the YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ compounds, show an anion-driven metallicity, explaining the unusual bond orders in the polynitrogen units. As the charge state of the polynitrogen double helix in Y₂N₁₁ is different from that previously found in Hf₂N₁₁ and because N₁₈ macrocycles have never been predicted or observed, their discovery significantly extends the chemistry of polynitrides.

The chemistry of nitrogen has long been thought to be very limited due to triple-bonded molecular nitrogen's extreme stability. As a result, in inorganic solid-state compounds at ambient pressure, nitrogen is typically present in the form of a nitride anion N³⁻ and does not form catenated polyanions (with the exception of azides). However, over the past 20 years, it has been shown that at high pressure nitrogen's chemistry significantly changes. For example, charged nitrogen N₂⁻ dimers,[¹⁻¹⁶] tetranitrogen N₄⁺ units,[¹⁷] pentazolate N₅⁻ rings,[¹⁸⁻²⁰] hexazine N₆ rings,[²¹⁻²³] and different polynitrogen chains[¹⁷,²⁴⁻²⁹] have been synthesized, and an even greater variety of nitrogen species is expected to form under high-pressure conditions according to theoretical calculations.[³⁰⁻³⁷] Such a diversity of nitrogen species can suggest that the scale of nitrogen chemistry under high pressure may be close to the scale of the rich carbon chemistry at ambient pressure. In addition to the discoveries of unique nitrogen entities that push the boundaries of fundamental nitrogen chemistry, nitrides synthesized under high pressure often possess key properties for functional applications, e.g. ReN₂, which is recoverable to ambient conditions,[⁴] has an extremely high hardness, a single layer of BeN₄ is a 2D material with unique electronic properties,[²⁹] and a variety of nitrides with high nitrogen content are promising for applications as high energy density materials.[³⁸] Recently, YN₅, YN₈, and YN₁₀ with polynitrogen chains, fused N₁₈ rings and isolated N₅ rings, respectively, were predicted to be stable near 100 GPa and are all promising prospects as high energy density materials.[³⁷]

Whereas a significant number of studies on binary metal-nitrogen compounds of alkali, alkaline earth, and transition metal elements under high pressure have been conducted,[¹⁻⁷,⁹⁻²⁹] the high-pressure chemistry and physical properties of rare earth metal nitrides are almost unknown. Until recently, in the yttrium-nitrogen system, only one binary Y–N compound was known: cubic yttrium nitride YN with the rock salt structure.[³⁹] In 2021 our group demonstrated that even at moderate compression (≈50 GPa) yttrium and nitrogen form a novel compound, Y₅N₁₄, with a new structural type.[⁸] In the Y₅N₁₄ structure, all nitrogen atoms form [N₂]⁻ dimers but, strikingly, there are three crystallographically distinct nitrogen dimers with different N–N bond lengths and charge states x, indicating the

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<footnote>[*] A. Aslandukov, Dr. D. Laniel, S. Khandarkhaeva, Prof. N. Dubrovinskaia
Material Physics and Technology at Extreme Conditions, Laboratory of Crystallography, University of Bayreuth
Universitätstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth (Germany)
E-mail: andrii.aslandukov@uni-bayreuth.de</footnote>

<footnote>A. Aslandukov, A. Aslandukova, Prof. L. Dubrovinsky
Bayerisches Geoinstitut, University of Bayreuth
Universitätstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth (Germany)</footnote>

<footnote>Dr. F. Trybel, Prof. I. A. Abrikosov, Prof. N. Dubrovinskaia
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University
58183 Linköping (Sweden)</footnote>

<footnote>Dr. D. Laniel
Centre for Science at Extreme Conditions and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh EH9 3FD (UK)</footnote>

<footnote>Dr. T. Fedotenko
Photon Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg (Germany)</footnote>

<footnote>Dr. G. Aprilis, Dr. C. Giacobbe, Dr. E. Lawrence Bright
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
BP 220, 38043 Grenoble Cedex (France)</footnote>

<footnote>© 2022 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</footnote>
complexity of chemical processes leading to the formation of
dense rare earth metal nitrides under high pressure.

In this study, we present the synthesis and character-
ization of two novel never predicted yttrium nitrides YN₆
and Y₂N₁₁ at 100 GPa, demonstrating a unique organization
of nitrogen atoms in their structures, forming anionic N₁₈
macrocycles and a polynitrogen double helix.

A diamond anvil cell, containing a sample composed of two pieces of yttrium embedded into molecular nitrogen, was compressed to 100(1) GPa and laser-heated to 3000 (200) K (see Figure 1a and Supporting Information for details). The precise 2D X-ray diffraction map, collected with a step of 0.5 µm at ID11 ESRF beamline from the bigger piece of yttrium after heating, revealed the crystal- lization of novel phases and allowed to pinpoint the location of crystallites most appropriate for single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements (Figure 1b). High-quality synchro- tron single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) data were then collected from the sample (Figure 1c). The subsequent crystal structure solution and refinement revealed the formation of two novel yttrium nitrides with chemical formulas of YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁. The refinement against SCXRD data resulted in very good reliability factors (R-factors, see Tables S1, S2). For cross-validation of the structural models, we performed density functional theory (DFT) based calculations (see Supporting Information for details). We carried out variable cell structural relaxations for both compounds and found that the relaxed structural parameters closely reproduce the corresponding experimental values (Table S3). The distribution of the YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ phases shown in the 2D X-ray diffraction map (Figure 1b) demon- strates that the heated area consists of many tiny crystallites and there is no obvious chemical gradient in the distribution. The formation of a mixture of phases with different chemical compositions and structures is a very common phenomenon at high-pressure synthesis in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell mainly attributed to the temperature gradient during laser heating.

The structure of YN₆ (Figure 2) has the monoclinic space
group C2/m (#12) with two Y and five N atoms on
crystallographically distinct positions (see Table S1 and the
CIF for the full crystallographic data[40]). Nitrogen atoms
form isolated, almost planar N₁₈ macrocycles aligned in the
(4 0 -1) planes (Figure 2b). The Y1 atoms are located in the
centers of the N₁₈ macrocycles, while the Y2 atoms occupy
the space between the stacking planes (Figure 2a). Thus, Y1
atoms are twelve-fold coordinated (coordination number
CN=12) by six nearest nitrogen atoms of the N₁₈ ring itself
and by three nitrogen atoms of the previous and next rings
in the stack (Figure 2c). The equatorial coordination of Y1
is very similar to the coordination of the rare-earth metals in
complexes with hexaaza-18-membered macrocyclic
ligands.[41-43] Y2 atoms are thirteen-fold coordinated (CN=
13) by N atoms of the six surrounding rings (Figure 2d).
Both Y1 and Y2 atoms are located in the *ac* plane forming a
2D tiling which can be described by two types of parallelo-
grams (Figure S1). The nets of Y atoms are alternating in
the *b*-direction.

Although 2D polynitrogen layers composed of fused N₁₈
rings were predicted for YN₈[³⁷] and K₂N₁₆,[⁴⁴] the isolated
anionic N₁₈ rings observed in YN₆ have never been reported
from experiments or calculations. Hypothetically, a non-
charged N₁₈ ring would be an aromatic planar ring with 18
electrons in the conjugated π-system with the N–N bond
order of 1.5. However, in the case of the YN₆ compound,
assuming +3 charge of yttrium atoms, the π-system of each
N₁₈ ring should accommodate additional 9 electrons at the
π* orbitals, which results in 27 electrons in the π-system,
losing aromaticity and thereby decreasing the average N–N
bond order to 1.25 and consequently increasing of the N–N
bond length. Moreover, the N₁₈ rings in YN₆ are non-planar
(the biggest torsion angle is 6.2(6)°), not satisfying the
aromaticity condition. The N–N distances (d*N*–*N*) in the N₁₈
macrocycle obtained from the SCXRD data are not equal
and vary from 1.270(5) Å to 1.364(7) Å with the average
d*N*–*N*=1.306(9) Å, in good agreement with the values

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Experimental details. a) Microphotograph of the sample chamber. b) 2D X-ray diffraction map showing the distribution of the two yttrium nitrides phases within the heated sample. The color intensity is proportional to the intensity of the following reflections: the (2 0 0), (0 2 0), and (1 1 -2) of YN₆ for the blue regions; the (1 0 1), (2 -1 0), and (2 -1 4) of Y₂N₁₁ for the green regions. c) Example of an X-ray diffraction pattern collected from the laser-heated sample at 100 GPa.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Crystal structure of YN₆. All Y atoms are greenish, N atoms are blue; grey thin lines outline the unit cell. a) A view of the crystal structure along the c-axis. b) A view of the crystal structure along the b-axis; yttrium atoms are omitted. c) The coordination environment of the Y1 and d) Y2 atoms. e) A view of a N₁₈ macrocycle; values of bond lengths and angles obtained from the experiment are shown in black, while those obtained from the DFT calculations are shown in red.</figcaption></figure>

obtained from the DFT-relaxed structure (Figure 2e). The analysis of N–N bond lengths suggests that N1–N2 and N5–N5 are single bonds (single N–N bonds vary from 1.30 to 1.44 Å at ≈100 GPa[24,27,29,45]), N2–N3 and N3–N4 have a bond order of 1.5 (the length of N–N bonds with the multiplicity of 1.5 is known to be in the range of 1.24 to 1.30 Å at ≈100 GPa[25]), while the multiplicity of the N4–N5 bond should be in between of 1 and 1.5. If one assumes the bond order of 1.125 for the N4–N5 bond, the average bond order in the [N₁₈]⁹⁻ ring is of 1.25, which corresponds to 27 electrons in the π-system and a total 9- charge. Non-integer charges and bond orders were previously reported in metallic nitrides under high pressure.[2,7,8,26]

Although 18-membered cycles are not common, they are known for a number of organic compounds. As an example, one can mention 18-crown-6 ether, whose molecule is non-planar as all ring-forming atoms are sp³-hybridized. A closer analog to the N₁₈ rings we observed in YN₆ would be an unsaturated cyclooctadecanonaene C₁₈H₁₈ ([18]annulene). The [18]annulene C₁₈H₁₈ is a fully planar aromatic compound, and until now the most nitrogen-substituted known derivative is hexaaza[18]annulene C₁₂N₆H₁₂.[46] The existence of [N₁₈]⁹⁻ anionic macrocycle allows us to assume that high-pressure could provide a route to the synthesis of N₁₈

aromatic molecule-full nitrogen substituted [18]annulene derivative.

The Y₂N₁₁ compound, also synthesized at 100(1) GPa, crystallizes in the structure with the hexagonal space group P6₂22 (#180), in which there are one Y and four N distinct atomic positions (see Table S2 and the CIF for the full crystallographic data[40]). Notably, the introduction of a racemic twinning law during the final structure refinement against SCXRD data leads to a slight decrease in the R₁ factor, therefore, Y₂N₁₁ with the space group P6₂22 coexists with its enantiomorph Y₂N₁₁ with the space group P6₄22 (#181). The structure of Y₂N₁₁ (Figure 3) is built of Y atoms (CN = 10) coordinated by discrete nitrogen atoms, N₂ dumbbells, and polynitrogen chains (Figure 3c). Each discrete nitrogen atom is surrounded by four yttrium atoms forming regular tetrahedra NY₄, which are connected through vertexes, forming a motif similar to the SiO₄ tetrahedral motif in β-quartz[47] (Figure 3a,b). Like SiO₄ groups in the structure of β-quartz, the NY₄ tetrahedra in Y₂N₁₁ form channels along the c-axis (Figure 3a), which are occupied by nitrogen dumbbells with their centers on the g₂ axis (Figure 3a). The dumbbells themselves are also in a tetrahedral coordination environment of Y atoms (Figure 3d). Two polymeric nitrogen chains are running along the channels in
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Crystal structure of Y₂N₁₁. All Y atoms are greenish, blue balls represent nitrogen atoms of the infinite chains, green balls—nitrogen atoms that form dumbbells, orange balls—discrete nitrogen atoms; grey thin lines outline the unit cell. a) A view of the crystal structure along the *c*-axis. b) A view of the crystal structure along the *b*-axis. c) The coordination environment of the Y atom. d) The coordination environment of discrete nitrogen atoms and nitrogen dumbbells. e) The coordination environment of polymeric nitrogen chain; values of bond lengths obtained from the experiment are shown in black, while those obtained from the DFT calculations are shown in red. f) Double helix built of two polynitrogen chains running along the *c*-direction around the *g*₂ screw-axis.</figcaption></figure>

the *c*-direction (shown in blue in Figure 3a, b, e) forming a double helix arrangement (highlighted in blue and red in Figure 3f) around the *g*₂ screw-axis. The crystal-chemical formula of Y₂N₁₁ may be written as Y₂N(N₄)₂(N₂).

It appears that Y₂N₁₁ is isostructural to previously reported Hf₂N₁₁ (space group P6₄22) synthesized by laser-heating Hf in nitrogen at 105 GPa.[26] The difference in the oxidation states of the cations Y³⁺ and Hf⁴⁺ in the isostructural compounds should lead to the difference in charge states of the corresponding nitrogen units. Indeed, taking into account that in the Hf₂N₁₁ structure at 105 GPa the N–N distance in N₂ dimers is equal to 1.186 Å, and the average N–N distance in polynitrogen chains is 1.32 Å, the charge distribution was proposed as (Hf⁴⁺)₂N³⁻(N₄²⁻)₂⁻(N₂⁻).[26] In Y₂N₁₁ at 100(1) GPa, the N–N distance in N₂ dimers is 1.13 Å 1.127(15), and the average N–N distance in polynitrogen chains is 1.29 Å, noticeably shorter than those in Hf₂N₁₁, indicating smaller charges on the nitrogen species. Since the N–N distance in N₂ dimers is longer than that in the triple-bonded non-charged N₂ molecule, but shorter than the bond length in N₂⁻, one can suggest the N₂⁰.⁵⁻ charge state for the dumbbells. Contrary to Hf₂N₁₁, the N–N distances in the polynitrogen chains in Y₂N₁₁ are almost equal and the length corresponds to a bond order between 1 and 1.5. Thus, one can assume the following charge distribution: (Y³⁺)₂N³⁻(N₄¹.²⁵⁻)₂(N₂⁰.⁵⁻). This example demonstrates that the π-system of polynitrogen chains is flexible in terms of charge accommodation.

Inorganic double helices are extremely rare[48–50] and the fact that such an arrangement of nitrogen atoms in the compounds was observed for the second time at about 100 GPa may indicate the existence of such a class of polynitrides under high pressure. Furthermore, the structure of Y₂N₁₁ can be considered as a host–guest, where yttrium and discrete nitrogen atoms form a β-quartz-type host framework (Figure 3), where inside and around the channels are guest nitrogen dimers and a polynitrogen double helix. Therefore, perhaps β-quartz-motifs could serve as a template for the synthesis of other inorganic double helices.

In order to get a deeper insight into the chemistry and physical properties of the novel compounds, further DFT-based calculations were performed (see Supporting Information for details). As mentioned above, variable-cell structural relaxations for both compounds at the synthesis pressure closely reproduced structural parameters and bond lengths obtained from the experimental data. Phonon dispersion relations calculated in harmonic approximation show that both YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ phases are dynamically stable at 100 GPa (Figure 4a and Figure 4d). To estimate the thermodynamic stability of the novel phases, a static enthalpy convex-hull for all known yttrium nitrides was calculated at 100 GPa. Within the used approximations, YN₆ lies on the convex hull together with YN and Y₅N₁₄, while Y₂N₁₁ lays 189 meV per atom above the convex hull (Figure S2). Being smaller than k_B T at synthesis temperature (3000 K, 258 meV), this suggests that the structure repre-
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Calculated properties of YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ at 100 GPa. YN₆: a) Phonon dispersions, b) electron density of states (red line indicates the Fermi level), c) electron localization function calculated in (4 0-1) plane. Y₂N₁₁: d) The phonon dispersions, e) the electron density of states (red line indicates a Fermi level), f) the electron localization function calculated in (0 0 1) plane (upper figure) or in (3 -2 0) plane (bottom figure).</figcaption></figure>

sents a local minimum in the potential energy landscape at synthesis conditions which is preserved as a meta-stable state under rapid T-quench to room temperature.

The agreement between theory and experiment at the synthesis pressure created the basis for the further analysis of chemistry and physical properties. To obtain an equation of state for YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁, variable-cell structure relaxations for both compounds were performed at target pressures between 0–150 GPa (using 10 GPa steps). Both structures were found to keep their respective symmetry in the relaxations within the full pressure range considered, however, the calculated phonon dispersion curves of YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ at atmospheric pressure show imaginary modes indicating dynamical instability at T=0 K (Figures S3 and S4). A 3rd order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state was subsequently fitted to the obtained energy-volume-points (see Supporting Information). The obtained bulk moduli are lower than the bulk moduli of other experimentally known yttrium nitrides, YN and Y₅N₁₄, and the bulk modulus decreases with the decrease of yttrium content: K₀(YN) = 151.0 GPa[⁵¹] > K₀(Y₅N₁₄) = 137.0 GPa[⁸] > K₀(Y₂N₁₁) = 115.7 GPa > K₀(YN₆) = 92.6 GPa. It is also worth noting that the bulk modulus of Y₂N₁₁ is significantly lower than the bulk modulus of the isostructural Hf₂N₁₁ compound (K₀(Hf₂N₁₁) = 193 GPa[²⁶]) due to the higher compressibility of M³⁺–N bonds in Y₂N₁₁ compared to M⁴⁺–N bonds in Hf₂N₁₁.

The calculated electron localization functions for YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁ at 100 GPa demonstrate a strong covalent

bonding between nitrogen atoms in the N₁₈ macrocycles, polynitrogen chains and nitrogen dimers (Figure 4c,f). At the same time, there is no obvious sign of covalent bonding between nitrogen and yttrium atoms and there is no sign of electron localization between these atoms, as expected for electrides.[⁵²] The N–N bond orders estimated from the crystal-chemical analysis were corroborated by calculated crystal orbital bond index[⁵³] (Tables S4 and S5). The computed electron density of states shows that both phases are metals (Figure 4b and Figure 4e). Remarkably, the main electronic contribution at the Fermi level comes from the nitrogen *p*-states, with an almost negligible contribution from yttrium states. The metallicity through the nitrogen π-system explains the observation of non-standard charges and bond multiplicities in the nitrogen units. Worth noting is also that the anion-driven metallicity was found for the majority of high-pressure di- and poly-nitrides,[², ⁷, ⁸, ²⁵, ²⁶, ⁵⁴] which, therefore, seems to be a regular phenomenon for high-pressure nitrides.

In conclusion, at 1 Mbar pressure, we have discovered two novel yttrium polynitrides YN₆ and Y₂N₁₁, which are built from extremely unique nitrogen structural units: N₁₈ macrocycles and double helix polynitrogen chains, respectively. The discovery of such compounds encourages further exploration of the remarkable inorganic chemistry of polynitrides. Moreover, the ability of nitrogen to form such structural units shows that perhaps humanity is on the verge of opening a new branch of chemistry—nitrogen organic chemistry under ultrahigh pressure.
Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for the provision of beamtime at the ID11 beamline and the using laser-heating setup of ID18 beamline. Computations were performed at the Leibniz Supercomputing Center of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and the Humanities, and the research center for scientific computing at the University of Bayreuth. DL thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, project LA-4916/1-1) and the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/ V025724/1) for financial support. ND and LD thank the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (BMBF, grant no. 05K19WC1) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG projects DU 954-11/1, DU 393- 9/2, DU 393-13/1) for financial support. ND and IAA also thank the Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linköping University (Faculty Grant SFO-Mat-LiU No. 2009 00971). IAA and FT are supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR) Grant No. 2019-05600. IAA acknowledges support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Wallenberg Scholar grant no. KAW-2018.0194). Computations were enabled by resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) using Dardel at the PDC Center for High Performance Computing, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and LUMI at the IT Center for Science (CSC), Finland through grant SNIC 2022/6-10 and SNIC 2021/37-10, respectively. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available
in the Supporting Information of this article.

**Keywords:** High-Pressure Chemistry • Inorganic Double Helix • Macrocycles • Polynitrides

<footnote>[1] D. Laniel, G. Weck, G. Gaiffe, G. Garbarino, P. Loubeyre, *J. Phys. Chem. Lett.* **2018**, *9*, 1600–1604.</footnote>

<footnote>[2] M. Bykov, K. R. Tasca, I. G. Batyrev, D. Smith, K. Glazyrin, S. Chariton, M. Mahmood, A. F. Goncharov, *Inorg. Chem.* **2020**, *59*, 14819–14826.</footnote>

<footnote>[3] V. S. Bhadram, D. Y. Kim, T. A. Strobel, *Chem. Mater.* **2016**, *28*, 1616–1620.</footnote>

<footnote>[4] M. Bykov, S. Chariton, H. Fei, T. Fedotenko, G. Aprilis, A. V. Ponomareva, F. Tasnádi, I. A. Abrikosov, B. Merle, P. Feldner, S. Vogel, W. Schnick, V. B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, M. Hanfland, A. Pakhomova, H.-P. Liermann, T. Katsura, N. Dubrovinskaia, L. Dubrovinsky, *Nat. Commun.* **2019**, *10*, 2994.</footnote>

<footnote>[5] A. F. Young, C. Sanloup, E. Gregoryanz, S. Scandolo, R. J. Hemley, H. K. Mao, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2006**, *96*, 155501.</footnote>

<footnote>[6] J. C. Crowhurst, A. F. Goncharov, B. Sadigh, C. L. Evans, P. G. Morrall, J. L. Ferreira, A. J. Nelson, *Science* **2006**, *311*, 1275–1278.</footnote>

<footnote>[7] D. Laniel, B. Winkler, T. Fedotenko, A. Aslandukova, A. Aslandukov, S. Vogel, T. Meier, M. Bykov, S. Chariton, K. Glazyrin, V. Milman, V. Prakapenka, W. Schnick, L. Dubrovinsky, N. Dubrovinskaia, *Phys. Rev. Mater.* **2022**, *6*, 023402.</footnote>

<footnote>[8] A. Aslandukov, A. Aslandukova, D. Laniel, I. Koemets, T. Fedotenko, L. Yuan, G. Steinle-Neumann, K. Glazyrin, M. Hanfland, L. Dubrovinsky, N. Dubrovinskaia, *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2021**, *125*, 18077–18084.</footnote>

<footnote>[9] S. B. Schneider, R. Frankovsky, W. Schnick, *Inorg. Chem.* **2012**, *51*, 2366–2373.</footnote>

<footnote>[10] K. Niwa, R. Fukui, T. Terabe, T. Kawada, D. Kato, T. Sasaki, K. Soda, M. Hasegawa, *Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.* **2019**, 3753–3757.</footnote>

<footnote>[11] W. Chen, J. S. Tse, J. Z. Jiang, *J. Phys. Condens. Matter* **2010**, *22*, 015404.</footnote>

<footnote>[12] K. Niwa, T. Yamamoto, T. Sasaki, M. Hasegawa, *Phys. Rev. Mater.* **2019**, *3*, 53601.</footnote>

<footnote>[13] K. Niwa, T. Terabe, D. Kato, S. Takayama, M. Kato, K. Soda, M. Hasegawa, *Inorg. Chem.* **2017**, *56*, 6410–6418.</footnote>

<footnote>[14] M. Wessel, R. Dronskowski, *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2010**, *132*, 2421–2429.</footnote>

<footnote>[15] K. Niwa, K. Suzuki, S. Muto, K. Tatsumi, K. Soda, T. Kikegawa, M. Hasegawa, *Chem. Eur. J.* **2014**, *20*, 13885–13888.</footnote>

<footnote>[16] K. Niwa, D. Dzivenko, K. Suzuki, R. Riedel, I. Troyan, M. Eremets, M. Hasegawa, *Inorg. Chem.* **2014**, *53*, 697–699.</footnote>

<footnote>[17] D. Laniel, B. Winkler, E. Koemets, T. Fedotenko, M. Bykov, E. Bykova, L. Dubrovinsky, N. Dubrovinskaia, *Nat. Commun.* **2019**, *10*, 4515.</footnote>

<footnote>[18] D. Laniel, G. Weck, P. Loubeyre, *Inorg. Chem.* **2018**, *57*, 10685–10693.</footnote>

<footnote>[19] B. A. Steele, E. Stavrou, J. C. Crowhurst, J. M. Zaug, V. B. Prakapenka, I. I. Oleynik, *Chem. Mater.* **2017**, *29*, 735–741.</footnote>

<footnote>[20] M. Bykov, E. Bykova, S. Chariton, V. B. Prakapenka, I. G. Batyrev, M. F. Mahmood, A. F. Goncharov, *Dalton Trans.* **2021**, *50*, 7229–7237.</footnote>

<footnote>[21] N. P. Salke, K. Xia, S. Fu, Y. Zhang, E. Greenberg, V. B. Prakapenka, J. Liu, J. Sun, J.-F. Lin, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2021**, *126*, 65702.</footnote>

<footnote>[22] Y. Wang, M. Bykov, I. Chepkasov, A. Samtsevich, E. Bykova, X. Zhang, S. Jiang, E. Greenberg, S. Chariton, V. B. Prakapenka, A. R. Oganov, A. F. Goncharov, *Nat. Chem.* **2022**, *14*, 794–800.</footnote>

<footnote>[23] D. Laniel, F. Trybel, Y. Yin, T. Fedotenko, S. Khandarkhaeva, A. I. Abrikosov, T. Bin Masood, C. Giacobbe, E. L. Bright, K. Glazyrin, M. Hanfland, I. Hotz, I. A. Abrikosov, L. Dubrovinsky, *arXiv:2112.09857* **2022**.</footnote>

<footnote>[24] M. Bykov, E. Bykova, G. Aprilis, K. Glazyrin, E. Koemets, I. Chuvashova, I. Kupenko, C. McCammon, M. Mezouar, V. Prakapenka, H.-P. Liermann, F. Tasnádi, A. V. Ponomareva, I. A. Abrikosov, N. Dubrovinskaia, L. Dubrovinsky, *Nat. Commun.* **2018**, *9*, 2756.</footnote>

<footnote>[25] M. Bykov, E. Bykova, E. Koemets, T. Fedotenko, G. Aprilis, K. Glazyrin, H.-P. Liermann, A. V. Ponomareva, J. Tidholm, F. Tasnádi, I. A. Abrikosov, N. Dubrovinskaia, L. Dubrovinsky, *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2018**, *57*, 9048–9053; *Angew. Chem.* **2018**, *130*, 9186–9191.</footnote>

<footnote>[26] M. Bykov, S. Chariton, E. Bykova, S. Khandarkhaeva, T. Fedotenko, A. V. Ponomareva, J. Tidholm, F. Tasnádi, I. A. Abrikosov, P. Sedmak, V. Prakapenka, M. Hanfland, H. P. Liermann, M. Mahmood, A. F. Goncharov, N. Dubrovinskaia,</footnote>
L. Dubrovinsky, *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2020**, *59*, 10321–10326;
*Angew. Chem.* **2020**, *132*, 10407–10412.

[27] M. Bykov, E. Bykova, A. V. Ponomareva, I. A. Abrikosov, S. Chariton, V. B. Prakapenka, M. F. Mahmood, L. Dubrovinsky, A. F. Goncharov, *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2021**, *60*, 9003–9008;
*Angew. Chem.* **2021**, *133*, 9085–9090.

[28] D. Laniel, A. A. Aslandukova, A. N. Aslandukov, T. Fedotenko, S. Chariton, K. Glazyrin, V. B. Prakapenka, L. S. Dubrovinsky, N. Dubrovinskaia, *Inorg. Chem.* **2021**, *60*, 14594–14601.

[29] M. Bykov, T. Fedotenko, S. Chariton, D. Laniel, K. Glazyrin, M. Hanfland, J. S. Smith, V. B. Prakapenka, M. F. Mahmood, A. F. Goncharov, A. V. Ponomareva, F. Tasnádi, A. I. Abrikosov, T. Bin Masood, I. Hotz, A. N. Rudenko, M. I. Katsnelson, N. Dubrovinskaia, L. Dubrovinsky, I. A. Abrikosov, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2021**, *126*, 175501.

[30] L. Li, K. Bao, X. Zhao, T. Cui, *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2021**, *125*, 24605–24612.

[31] J. Lin, F. Wang, Q. Rui, J. Li, Q. Wang, X. Wang, *Matter Radiat. Extrem.* **2022**, *7*, 038401.

[32] Y. Chen, X. Cai, H. Wang, H. Wang, H. Wang, *Sci. Rep.* **2018**, *8*, 10670.

[33] S. Yu, B. Huang, Q. Zeng, A. R. Oganov, L. Zhang, G. Frapper, *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2017**, *121*, 11037–11046.

[34] X. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Miao, X. Zhong, J. Lv, T. Cui, J. Li, L. Chen, C. J. Pickard, Y. Ma, *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2012**, *109*, 175502.

[35] J. Lin, D. Peng, Q. Wang, J. Li, H. Zhu, X. Wang, *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.* **2021**, *23*, 6863–6870.

[36] S. Duwal, Y.-J. Ryu, M. Kim, C.-S. Yoo, S. Bang, K. Kim, N. H. Hur, *J. Chem. Phys.* **2018**, *148*, 134310.

[37] J. Y. Miao, Z. S. Lu, F. Peng, C. Lu, *Chin. Phys. Lett.* **2021**, *38*, 066201.

[38] F. Jiao, C. Zhang, W. Xie, *Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.* **2021**, *23*, 7313–7320.

[39] C. P. Kempter, N. H. Krikorian, J. C. Mcguire, *J. Phys. Chem.* **1957**, *61*, 1237–1238.

[40] Deposition Numbers 2173746 and 2173750 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.

[41] W. Radecka-Paryzek, *Inorg. Chim. Acta* **1981**, *54*, 251–253.

[42] W. A. Rabanal-León, J. A. Murillo-López, D. Páez-Hernández, R. Arratia-Pérez, *J. Phys. Chem. A* **2015**, *119*, 9931–9940.

[43] M. A. Fik-Jaskólka, I. Pospieszna-Markiewicz, G. N. Roviello, M. Kubicki, W. Radecka-Paryzek, V. Patroniak, *Inorg. Chem.* **2021**, *60*, 2122–2126.

[44] B. A. Steele, I. I. Oleynik, *J. Phys. Chem. A* **2017**, *121*, 8955–8961.

[45] M. I. Eremets, A. G. Gavriliuk, I. A. Trojan, D. A. Dzivenko, R. Boehler, *Nat. Mater.* **2004**, *3*, 558–563.

[46] W. T. Bell, F. Guzzo, *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **1984**, *106*, 6112–6114.

[47] K. Kihara, *Eur. J. Mineral.* **1990**, *2*, 63–78.

[48] V. Soghomonian, Q. Chen, R. C. Haushalter, J. Zubieta, C. J. O'Connor, *Science* **1993**, *259*, 1596–1599.

[49] A. K. Jissy, A. Datta, *J. Phys. Chem. Lett.* **2013**, *4*, 1018–1022.

[50] D. Pfister, K. Schäfer, C. Ott, B. Gerke, R. Pöttgen, O. Janka, M. Baumgartner, A. Efimova, A. Hohmann, P. Schmidt, S. Venkatachalam, L. van Wüllen, U. Schürmann, L. Kienle, V. Duppel, E. Parzinger, B. Miller, J. Becker, A. Holleitner, R. Weihrich, T. Nilges, *Adv. Mater.* **2016**, *28*, 9783–9791.

[51] S. Zerroug, F. Ali Sahraoui, N. Bouarissa, *Appl. Phys. A* **2009**, *97*, 345–350.

[52] S. G. Dale, E. R. Johnson, *J. Phys. Chem. A* **2018**, *122*, 9371–9391.

[53] P. C. Müller, C. Ertural, J. Hempelmann, R. Dronskowski, *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2021**, *125*, 7959–7970.

[54] M. Bykov, E. Bykova, A. V. Ponomareva, F. Tasnádi, S. Chariton, V. B. Prakapenka, K. Glazyrin, J. S. Smith, M. F. Mahmood, I. A. Abrikosov, A. F. Goncharov, *ACS Nano* **2021**, *15*, 13539–13546.

Manuscript received: May 20, 2022

Accepted manuscript online: June 21, 2022

Version of record online: July 13, 2022