<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

# Inclusive search for a highly boosted Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair

Albert M Sirunyan, Armen Tumasyan, Wolfgang Adam, Federico Ambrogi, Ece Asilar, Thomas Bergauer, Johannes Brandstetter, Erica Brondolin, Marko Dragicevic, Janos Erö, et al.

► To cite this version:

Albert M Sirunyan, Armen Tumasyan, Wolfgang Adam, Federico Ambrogi, Ece Asilar, et al. Inclusive search for a highly boosted Higgs boson decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair. Phys.Rev.Lett., 2018, 120 (7), pp.071802. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.071802. hal-01714734

HAL Id: hal-01714734

https://hal.science/hal-01714734v1

Submitted on 18 Jun 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Inclusive Search for a Highly Boosted Higgs Boson Decaying to a Bottom Quark-Antiquark Pair

A. M. Sirunyan et al.*

(CMS Collaboration)

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

(Received 16 September 2017; published 14 February 2018)

An inclusive search for the standard model Higgs boson (H) produced with large transverse momentum ($p_T$) and decaying to a bottom quark-antiquark pair ($b\bar{b}$) is performed using a data set of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected with the CMS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. A highly Lorentz-boosted Higgs boson decaying to $b\bar{b}$ is reconstructed as a single, large radius jet, and it is identified using jet substructure and dedicated b tagging techniques. The method is validated with $Z \to b\bar{b}$ decays. The $Z \to b\bar{b}$ process is observed for the first time in the single-jet topology with a local significance of 5.1 standard deviations (5.8 expected). For a Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV, an excess of events above the expected background is observed (expected) with a local significance of 1.5 (0.7) standard deviations. The measured cross section times branching fraction for production via gluon fusion of $H \to b\bar{b}$ with reconstructed $p_T > 450$ GeV and in the pseudorapidity range $-2.5 < \eta < 2.5$ is $74 \pm 48(\text{stat})^{+17}_{-10}(\text{syst})$ fb, which is consistent within uncertainties with the standard model prediction.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.071802

In the standard model (SM) [1–3], the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism [4–8] is responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking and the mass of elementary particles. Although a Higgs boson (H) was discovered [9–11], the LHC data sets of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ and 8 TeV were not sufficient to establish the coupling to bottom quarks [12], despite the 58.1% expected branching fraction of the Higgs boson to bottom quark-antiquark ($b\bar{b}$) pairs [13]. The most sensitive method to search for $H \to b\bar{b}$ decays at a hadron collider is to use events in which the Higgs boson is produced in association with a W or Z boson (VH) decaying to leptons, and recoiling with a large transverse momentum ($p_T$) [14], in order to suppress the overwhelming irreducible background from quantum chromodynamics (QCD) multijet production of b quarks. Because of this background, an observation of $H(b\bar{b})$ decays in the gluon fusion production mode (GGF) as considered impossible. This Letter presents the first inclusive search for $H \to b\bar{b}$, where the Higgs boson is produced with high-$p_T$. Measurements of high-$p_T$ $H(b\bar{b})$ decays may resolve the loop induced and tree-level contributions to the GGF process [15] and provide an alternative approach to study

the top quark Yukawa coupling in addition to the $t\bar{t}H$ process.

The results reported in this Letter are based on a data set of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC in 2016, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The main experimental difficulties for this search originate from the large cross section for background multijet events at low jet mass and the restrictive trigger requirements needed to reduce the data recording rate. Therefore, we require events to have a high-$p_T$ Higgs boson candidate and define six $p_T$ categories from 450 GeV to 1 TeV with variable width from 50 to 200 GeV. Combinatorial backgrounds are reduced by requiring the Higgs boson’s decay products to be clustered in a single jet [14]. The jet is required to have a two-prong substructure and b tagging properties consistent with the $H(b\bar{b})$ signal. The nontrivial jet mass shape is difficult to model parametrically. For this reason, the dominant background from SM QCD multijet production is estimated in data by inverting the b tagging requirement, which is, by design, decorrelated from jet mass and $p_T$. A simultaneous fit to the distributions of the jet mass in all categories is performed in the range 40 to 201 GeV to extract the inclusive $H(b\bar{b})$ and $Z(b\bar{b})$ production cross sections and to determine the normalizations and shapes of the jet mass distributions for the backgrounds.

A detailed description of the CMS detector, together with a definition of the coordinate system and the relevant kinematic variables, can be found in Ref. [16]. The central feature of the CMS apparatus is a superconducting solenoid

<footnote>*Full author list given at the end of the article.</footnote>

<footnote>Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP³.</footnote>
of 6 m internal diameter, providing a magnetic field of
3.8 T. A silicon pixel and strip tracker, a lead tungstate
crystal electromagnetic calorimeter, and a brass and scin-
tillator hadron calorimeter, each composed of a barrel and
two end cap sections, reside within the solenoid. Forward
calorimeters extend the pseudorapidity ($\eta$) [16] coverage
provided by the barrel and end cap detectors. Muons are
detected in gas-ionization chambers embedded in the steel
flux-return yoke outside the solenoid.

Simulated samples of signal and background events are
produced using various Monte Carlo (MC) event gener-
ators, with the CMS detector response modeled using the
GEANT4 [17] program. The MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO 2.3.3
[18] generator is used for the diboson, W + jets, Z + jets,
QCD multijet samples at leading order (LO) accuracy, with
matching [19] between jets from the matrix element
calculation and the parton shower description, while
POWHEG 2.0 [20–22] at next-to-leading order (NLO) pre-
cision is used to model the $t\bar{t}$ and single-top processes. For
parton showering and hadronization, the POWHEG and
MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO samples are interfaced with
PYTHIA 8.212 [23]. The PYTHIA parameters for the under-
lying event description are set to the CUETP8M1 tune [24].
The production cross sections for the diboson samples are
calculated to next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) accu-
racy with the MCFM 7.0 program [25]. The cross section for
top quark pair production is computed with TOP++ 2.0 [26]
at NNLO. The cross sections for W + jets and Z + jets
samples include higher-order QCD and electroweak (EW)
corrections and improve modeling of high-$p_T$ W and Z
bosons events [27–30]. The parton distribution function
(PDF) set NNPDF3.0 [31] is used to produce all simulated
samples, with the accuracy (LO or NLO) corresponding to
that of the generator used. The Higgs boson signal samples
are produced using the POWHEG event generator with
$m_H = 125$ GeV. For the GGF production mode, the
POWHEG generated sample with up to one extra jet in
matrix element calculations is normalized to the inclusive
cross section at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order
(N³LO) accuracy [32–35]. The resulting Higgs boson $p_T$
spectrum neglects the effects of the finite top quark mass
[36] and associated higher-order QCD corrections [37–40],
which are expected to be large for $p_T$ greater than
approximately twice the mass of the top quark [36]. A
$p_T$-dependent correction has been derived to account for
both of these effects. The POWHEG GGF $p_T$ spectrum is
reweighted to the 0–2 jet CKKW-L [26,41,42] merged
LO GGF process incorporating the finite top quark
mass ($m_t$) [13,43–45]. This spectrum is then corrected
by the approximate NLO to LO ratio, obtained by expand-
ing in powers of $1/m_t^2$ up to $1/m_t^4$, and the effective NNLO
to NLO ratio [46,47] in the infinite top quark mass
approximation. The overall $p_T$-dependent correction to
the initial N³LO POWHEG GGF spectrum is found to be
$1.27 \pm 0.38$, resulting in a GGF cross section times $H(b\bar{b})$

branching fraction of $31.7 \pm 9.5$ fb for reconstructed Higgs
boson $p_T > 450$ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.5$. An uncertainty of
30% to the overall correction is estimated from the
comparison of different predictions obtained by using
(i) a merging scale of 100 instead of 20 GeV, (ii) the
inclusive two-jet GGF process generation, and (iii) the
MADGRAPH5_aMC@NLO effective field theory approximation
[13,46] normalized to the inclusive N³LO cross
section. The $p_T$ spectrum of the Higgs boson for the vector
boson fusion (VBF) production mode is reweighted to
account for N³LO corrections to the cross section. These
corrections [48,49] have a negligible effect on the yield for
this process for events with Higgs boson $p_T > 450$ GeV.

The particle-flow event algorithm [50] is employed to
reconstruct and identify each individual particle with an
optimized combination of information from the various
elements of the CMS detector. The algorithm identifies
each reconstructed particle as an electron, a muon, a
photon, or a charged or a neutral hadron. The missing
transverse momentum vector is defined as the negative
vectorial sum of the transverse momenta of all the particles
identified in the event, and its magnitude is referred to
as $p_T^{\text{miss}}$.

The particles are clustered into jets using the anti-$k_T$
algorithm [51] with a distance parameter of 0.8 (AK8 jets).
To mitigate the effect of pileup, the pileup per particle
identification (PUPPI) algorithm [52] assigns a weight to
each particle prior to jet clustering based on the likelihood
of the particle originating from the hard scattering vertex.
Further corrections are applied to the jet energy as a
function of jet $\eta$ and $p_T$ to account for detector response
nonlinearities.

To isolate the Higgs boson signal, a high-$p_T$ signal jet is
required. Combinations of several online selections are
used, all requiring the total hadronic transverse energy in
the event ($H_T$) or jet $p_T$ to be above a given threshold. In
addition, a minimum threshold on the jet mass is imposed
after removing remnants of soft radiation with the jet
trimming technique [53] to reduce the $H_T$ or $p_T$ thresholds
and improve the signal acceptance. The online selection is
fully efficient at selecting events offline with at least one
AK8 jet with $p_T > 450$ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.5$. Events con-
taining identified and isolated electrons, muons, or $\tau$
leptons with $p_T > 10, 10, \text{ or } 18$ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.5, 2.4,$
or 2.3, respectively, are vetoed to reduce backgrounds from
SM EW processes. Since no genuine $p_T^{\text{miss}}$ is expected for
signal processes, events with $p_T^{\text{miss}} > 140$ GeV are
removed in order to further reduce the top quark back-
ground contamination. The leading (in $p_T$) jet in the event
is assumed to be the Higgs boson candidate, the $H$ jet. The
soft-drop algorithm [54,55] is used to remove soft and
wide-angle radiation with a soft radiation fraction $z$ less
than 0.1. The parameter $\beta$ is set to zero, which corresponds
to the case in which approximately the same fraction of
energy is groomed away, regardless of the initial jet energy.
The use of soft-drop grooming reduces the jet mass ($m_{SD}$) for background QCD events when large jet masses arise from soft gluon radiation. For signal events, the jet mass is primarily determined by the $H(b\bar{b})$ decay kinematics and its distribution peaks at the mass of the Higgs boson. Dedicated $m_{SD}$ corrections [56] are derived from simulation and data in a region enriched with merged $W(q\bar{q})$ decays from $t\bar{t}$ events. They remove a residual dependence on the jet $p_T$ and match the jet mass scale and resolution to those observed in data.

The dimensionless mass scale variable for QCD jets, $\rho = \log(m_{SD}^2/p_T^2)$ [54,57], whose distribution is roughly invariant in different ranges of jet $p_T$, is used to characterize the correlation between the jet b tagging discriminator, jet mass, and jet $p_T$. Only events in the range $-6.0 < \rho < -2.1$ are considered, to avoid instabilities at the edges of the distribution due to finite cone limitations from the AK8 jet clustering ($\rho \gtrsim -2.1$) and to avoid the nonperturbative regime of the soft-drop mass calculation ($\rho \lesssim -6.0$). This requirement is fully efficient for the Higgs boson signal.

The $N_2^1$ variable [58], which is based on a ratio of 2-point and 3-point generalized energy correlation functions (ECFs) [59], is exploited to determine how consistent a jet is with having a two-prong substructure. The calculation of $N_2^1$ is based on the jet constituents after application of the soft-drop grooming algorithm to the jet. It provides excellent discrimination between two-prong signal jets and QCD background jets [58]. However, any selection on $N_2^1$ or other similar variables [60] shapes the jet mass distributions differently depending on the $p_T$ of the jet. Therefore a transformation of $N_2^1$ to $N_2^{1,DDT}$ is applied, where DDT stands for designed decorrelated tagger [57], to reduce its correlation with $\rho$ and $p_T$ in multijet events. We define $N_2^{1,DDT} = N_2^1 - N_{2(26\%)}^1$, where $N_{2(26\%)}^1$ is the 26th percentile of the $N_2^1$ distribution in simulated QCD events as a function of $\rho$ and $p_T$. This ensures that the selection $N_2^{1,DDT} < 0$ yields a constant QCD background efficiency of 26% across the entire $\rho$ and $p_T$ range considered in this search. The chosen percentile maximizes the sensitivity to the Higgs boson signal. In order to select events in which the H jet is most likely to contain two b quarks, we use the double-$b$ tagger algorithm [61]. Several observables that characterize the distinct properties of b hadrons and their flight directions in relation to the jet substructure are used as input variables to this multivariate algorithm in order to distinguish between H jets and QCD jets. An H jet is considered double-$b$ tagged if its double-$b$ tag discriminator value is above a threshold corresponding to a 1% misidentification rate for QCD jets and a 33% efficiency for $H(b\bar{b})$ jets.

Events with (without) a double-$b$ tagged H jet define the passing (failing) region. In the passing region, the gluon fusion process dominates, although other Higgs boson

production mechanisms contribute: VBF (12%), $VH$ (8%), and $t\bar{t}H$ (5%). They are all taken into account when extracting the Higgs boson yield.

The contribution of $t\bar{t}$ production to the total SM background is estimated to be less than 3%. It is obtained from simulation corrected with scale factors derived from a $t\bar{t}$-enriched control sample in which an isolated muon is required. This sample is included in a global fit used to extract the signal and the scale factors are treated as unconstrained parameters. They multiply the $t\bar{t}$ contribution, correcting its overall normalization and the double-$b$ mistag efficiency for jets originating from top quark decays.

The main background in the passing region, QCD multijet production, has a nontrivial jet mass shape that is difficult to model parametrically and dependent on jet $p_T$, so we constrain it using the signal-depleted failing region. Since the double-$b$ tagger discriminator and the jet mass are largely uncorrelated, the passing and failing regions have similar QCD jet mass distributions, and their ratio, the “pass-fail ratio” $R_{p/f}$, is expected to be nearly constant as a function of jet mass and $p_T$. To account for the residual difference between the shapes of passing and failing events, $R_{p/f}$ is parametrized as a polynomial in $\rho$ and $p_T$, $R_{p/f}(\rho, p_T) = \sum_{k,l} a_{k,l} \rho^k p_T^l$. The coefficients $a_{k,l}$ have no external constraints but are determined from a simultaneous fit to the data in passing and failing regions across the whole jet mass range. To determine the order of the polynomial necessary to fit the data, a Fisher F-test [62] is performed. Based on its results, a polynomial of second order in $\rho$ and first order in $p_T$ is selected.

The systematic uncertainties associated with the jet mass scale, the jet mass resolution, and the $N_2^{1,DDT}$ selection efficiency are correlated among the $W$, $Z$, and $H(b\bar{b})$ processes. These uncertainties are estimated using an independent sample of merged $W$ jets. Additional details are available in the Supplemental Material [63], which includes Ref. [64]. The efficiency of the double-$b$ tagger is measured in data and simulation in a sample enriched in $b\bar{b}$ from gluon splitting [61]. Scale factors relating data and simulation are then computed and applied to the simulation. These scale factors determine the initial distributions of the jet mass for the $W(q\bar{q})$, $Z(q\bar{q})$, and $H(b\bar{b})$ processes, and they are further constrained in the fit to data due to the presence of the $W$ and $Z$ resonances in the jet mass distribution. The uncertainty associated with the modeling of the GGF Higgs $p_T$ spectrum is propagated to the overall normalization of the GGF Higgs signal. In addition, the shape of the GGF Higgs $p_T$ distribution is allowed to vary depending on the Higgs boson $p_T$ by up to 30% at 1000 GeV, without changing the overall normalization. To account for some potentially $p_T$-dependent deviations due to missing higher-order corrections, uncertainties are applied to the $W(q\bar{q})$ and $Z(q\bar{q})$ yields that are $p_T$-dependent and correlated per $p_T$ bin. An additional
<table><caption>TABLE I. Summary of the systematic uncertainties affecting the signal, W and Z + jets processes. Instances where the uncertainty does not apply are indicated by “...”.</caption><thead><tr><th>Systematic source</th><th>W/Z</th><th>H</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Integrated luminosity</td><td>2.5%</td><td>2.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Trigger efficiency</td><td>4%</td><td>4%</td></tr><tr><td>Pileup</td><td>&lt;1%</td><td>&lt;1%</td></tr><tr><td>N<sub>2</sub><sup>1,DDT</sup> selection efficiency</td><td>4.3%</td><td>4.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Double-b tag</td><td>4% (Z)</td><td>4%</td></tr><tr><td>Jet energy scale/ resolution</td><td>10/15%</td><td>10/15%</td></tr><tr><td>Jet mass scale (p<sub>T</sub>)</td><td>0.4%/100 GeV (p<sub>T</sub>)</td><td>0.4%/100 GeV (p<sub>T</sub>)</td></tr><tr><td>Simulation sample size</td><td>2–25%</td><td>4–20% (GGF)</td></tr><tr><td>H p<sub>T</sub> correction</td><td>...</td><td>30% (GGF)</td></tr><tr><td>NLO QCD corrections</td><td>10%</td><td>...</td></tr><tr><td>NLO EW corrections</td><td>15–35%</td><td>...</td></tr><tr><td>NLO EW W/Z decorrelation</td><td>5–15%</td><td>...</td></tr></tbody></table>

systematic uncertainty is included to account for potential differences between the W and Z higher-order corrections (EW W/Z decorrelation). Finally, additional systematic uncertainties are applied to the $W(q\bar{q})$, $Z(q\bar{q})$, and $H(b\bar{b})$ yields to account for the uncertainties due to the jet energy scale and resolution [65], variations in the amount of pileup, and the integrated luminosity determination [66]. A quantitative summary of the systematic effects considered is shown in Table I.

In order to validate the background estimation method and associated systematic uncertainties, studies are performed on simulated samples injecting signal events and determining the bias on the measured signal cross section. No significant bias is observed in these studies.

A binned maximum likelihood fit to the observed $m_{SD}$ distributions in the range 40 to 201 GeV with 7 GeV bin width is performed using the sum of the $H(b\bar{b})$, W, Z, $t\bar{t}$, and QCD multijet contributions. The fit is done simultaneously in the passing and failing regions of the six $p_T$ categories within $450 < p_T < 1000$ GeV, and in the $t\bar{t}$-enriched control region. The production cross sections relative to the SM cross sections (signal strengths) for the Higgs and the Z bosons, $\mu_H$ and $\mu_Z$, respectively, are extracted from the fit. Figure 1 shows the $m_{SD}$ distributions in data for the passing and failing regions with measured SM background and $H(b\bar{b})$ contributions. Contributions from W and Z boson production are clearly visible in the data.

The measured Z boson signal strength is $\mu_Z = 0.78 \pm 0.14(\text{stat})^{+0.19}_{-0.13}(\text{syst})$, which corresponds to an

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>FIG. 1. The $m_{SD}$ distributions in data for the failing (left) and passing (right) regions and combined $p_T$ categories. The QCD multijet background in the passing region is predicted using the failing region and the pass-fail ratio $R_{p/f}$. The features at 166 and 180 GeV in the $m_{SD}$ distribution are due to the kinematic selection on $\rho$, which affects each $p_T$ category differently. In the bottom panel, the ratio of the data to its statistical uncertainty, after subtracting the nonresonant backgrounds, is shown.</figcaption></figure>

observed significance of 5.1 standard deviations ($\sigma$) with $5.8\sigma$ expected. This constitutes the first observation of the Z boson signal in the single-jet topology [67] and validates the substructure and b tagging techniques for the Higgs boson search in the same topology. The measured cross section for the Z + jets process for jet $p_T > 450$ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.5$ is $0.85 \pm 0.16(\text{stat})^{+0.20}_{-0.14}(\text{syst})$ pb, which is
<table><caption>TABLE II. Fitted signal strength, expected and observed significance of the Higgs and Z boson signal. The 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the Higgs boson signal strength is also listed.</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>H</th><th>H no p<sub>T</sub><br>corrections</th><th>Z</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Observed signal strength</td><td>2.3<sup>+1.8</sup><sub>-1.6</sub></td><td>3.2<sup>+2.2</sup><sub>-2.0</sub></td><td>0.78<sup>+0.23</sup><sub>-0.19</sub></td></tr><tr><td>Expected UL signal strength</td><td>&lt;3.3</td><td>&lt;4.1</td><td>...</td></tr><tr><td>Observed UL signal strength</td><td>&lt;5.8</td><td>&lt;7.2</td><td>...</td></tr><tr><td>Expected significance</td><td>0.7σ</td><td>0.5σ</td><td>5.8σ</td></tr><tr><td>Observed significance</td><td>1.5σ</td><td>1.6σ</td><td>5.1σ</td></tr></tbody></table>

consistent within uncertainties with the SM production cross section of $1.09 \pm 0.11$ pb [30]. Likewise, the measured Higgs boson signal strength is $\mu_H=2.3 \pm 1.5(\text{stat})^{+1.0}_{-0.4}(\text{syst})$ and includes the corrections to the Higgs boson $p_T$ spectrum described earlier. The corresponding observed (expected) upper limit on the Higgs boson signal strength at a 95% confidence level is 5.8 (3.3), while the observed (expected) significance is $1.5\sigma$ (0.7$\sigma$). The observed $\mu_H$ implies a measured GGF cross section times $H(b\bar{b})$ branching fraction for jet $p_T > 450$ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.5$ of $74 \pm 48(\text{stat})^{+17}_{-10}(\text{syst})$ fb, assuming the SM values for the ratios of the different $H(b\bar{b})$ production modes. This measurement is consistent within uncertainties with the SM GGF cross section times $H(b\bar{b})$ branching fraction of $31.7 \pm 9.5$ fb.

Table II summarizes the measured signal strengths and significances for the Higgs and Z boson processes. In particular, they are also reported for the case in which no corrections to the Higgs boson $p_T$ spectrum are applied. Figure 2 shows the profile likelihood test statistic scan in data as function of the Higgs and Z boson signal strengths ($\mu_H, \mu_Z$).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>FIG. 2. Profile likelihood test statistic $-2\Delta \log \mathcal{L}$ scan in data as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths ($\mu_H, \mu_Z$).</figcaption></figure>

In summary, an inclusive search for the standard model Higgs boson with $p_T > 450$ GeV decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs and reconstructed as a single, large-radius jet is presented. The Z+jets process is observed for the first time in the single-jet topology with a significance of $5.1\sigma$. The Higgs production is measured with an observed (expected) significance of $1.5\sigma$ (0.7$\sigma$) when including Higgs boson $p_T$ spectrum corrections accounting for higher-order and finite top quark mass effects. The measured cross section times branching fraction for the gluon fusion $H(b\bar{b})$ production for reconstructed $p_T$ and $|\eta| < 2.5$ is $74 \pm 48(\text{stat})^{+17}_{-10}(\text{syst})$ fb, which is consistent with the SM prediction within uncertainties.

We congratulate our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC and thank the technical and administrative staffs at CERN and at other CMS institutes for their contributions to the success of the CMS effort. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the computing centers and personnel of the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid for delivering so effectively the computing infrastructure essential to our analyses. Finally, we acknowledge the enduring support for the construction and operation of the LHC and the CMS detector provided by the following funding agencies: BMWFW and FWF (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES and CSF (Croatia); RPF (Cyprus); SENESCYT (Ecuador); MoER, ERC IUT, and ERDF (Estonia); Academy of Finland, MEC, and HIP (Finland); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); OTKA and NIH (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); MSIP and NRF (Republic of Korea); LAS (Lithuania); MOE and UM (Malaysia); BUAP, CINVESTAV, CONACYT, LNS, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); MBIE (New Zealand); PAEC (Pakistan); MSHE and NSC (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR (Dubna); MON, RosAtom, RAS, RFBR and RAEP (Russia); MESTD (Serbia); SEIDI, CPAN, PCTI and FEDER (Spain); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); MST (Taipei); ThEPCenter, IPST, STAR, and NSTDA (Thailand); TUBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); NASU and SFFR (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (USA).

[1] A. Salam, Weak and electromagnetic interactions, in *Elementary particle physics: relativistic groups and analyticity*. Proceedings of the Eighth Nobel Symposium, edited by Nils Svartholm (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968), p. 367.
[2] S. L. Glashow, Partial-Symmetries of Weak Interactions, Nucl. Phys. **22**, 579 (1961).

[3] S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. **19**, 1264 (1967).

[4] F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. **13**, 321 (1964).

[5] P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries, Massless particles and Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. **12**, 132 (1964).

[6] P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. **13**, 585 (1964).

[7] P. W. Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. **145**, 1156 (1966).

[8] G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. **13**, 585 (1964).

[9] ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B **716**, 1 (2012).

[10] CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B **716**, 30 (2012).

[11] CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ and 8 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 081.

[12] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS and CMS Collaborations), Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC pp Collision Data at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ and 8 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 045.

[13] D. de Florian et al., CERN Report No. CERN-2017-002-M, 2016.

[14] J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin, and G. P. Salam, Jet Substructure as a New Higgs-Search Channel at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. **100**, 242001 (2008).

[15] C. Grojean, E. Salvioni, M. Schlaffer, and A. Weiler, Very boosted Higgs in gluon fusion, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 022.

[16] CMS Collaboration, The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, J. Instrum. **3**, S08004 (2008).

[17] S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), GEANT4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A **506**, 250 (2003).

[18] J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.

[19] J. Alwall, S. S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, N. Lavesson, L. Lonnblad, F. Maltoni, M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, C. G. Papadopoulos, F. Piccinini, S. Schumann, M. Treccani, J. Winter, and M. Worek, Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C **53**, 473 (2008).

[20] P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2004) 040.

[21] S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2007) 070.

[22] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2010) 043.

[23] T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. **191**, 159 (2015).

[24] CMS Collaboration, Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C **76**, 155 (2016).

[25] J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. **205–206**, 10 (2010).

[26] M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders Through $O(\alpha_s^4)$, Phys. Rev. Lett. **110**, 252004 (2013).

[27] S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini, and M. Schönherr, NLO electroweak automation and precise predictions for $W +$ multijet production at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 012.

[28] S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini, and M. Schönherr, NLO QCD + EW predictions for $V +$ jets including off-shell vector-boson decays and multijet merging, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 021.

[29] S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert, S. Pozzorini, M. Schönherr, and P. Maierhöfer, NLO QCD + EW automation and precise predictions for $V +$ multijet production, arXiv:1505.05704.

[30] J. M. Lindert et al., Precise predictions for $V +$ jets dark matter backgrounds, Eur. Phys. J. C **77**, 829 (2017).

[31] R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions for the LHC run II, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 040.

[32] D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini, and D. Tommasini, Higgs boson production at the LHC: Transverse momentum resummation effects in the $H \to 2\gamma$, $H \to WW \to \ell v \ell v$ and $H \to ZZ \to 4l$ decay modes, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 132.

[33] M. Grazzini and H. Sargsyan, Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 129.

[34] E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P. Slavich, and A. Vicini, Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 088.

[35] E. Bagnaschi and A. Vicini, The Higgs transverse momentum distribution in gluon fusion as a multiscale problem, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 056.

[36] U. J. Baur and E. W. N. Glover, Higgs boson production at large transverse momentum in hadronic collisions, Nucl. Phys. B**339**, 38 (1990).

[37] R. Boughezal, F. Caola, K. Melnikov, F. Petriello, and M. Schulze, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 072.

[38] R. Boughezal, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu, and F. Petriello, Higgs boson production in association with a jet using jettiness subtraction, Phys. Lett. B **748**, 5 (2015).
[39] R. Boughezal, J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu, F. Petriello, and C. Williams, Color-singlet production at NNLO in MCFM, Eur. Phys. J. C **77**, 7 (2017).

[40] X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, and M. Jaquier, Higgs plus one jet production at NNLO, Proc. Sci., RAD-COR2015 (2016) 056.

[41] S. Catani, F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and B. R. Webber, QCD matrix Elements + Parton showers, J. High Energy Phys. **11** (2001) 063.

[42] L. Lonnblad, Correcting the colour-dipole cascade model with fixed order matrix elements, J. High Energy Phys. **05** (2002) 046.

[43] V. Hirschi and O. Mattelaer, Automated event generation for loop-induced processes, J. High Energy Phys. **10** (2015) 146.

[44] M. Buschmann, D. Goncalves, S. Kuttimalai, M. Schonherr, F. Krauss, and T. Plehn, Mass effects in the Higgs-gluon coupling: Boosted vs. off-shell production, J. High Energy Phys. **02** (2015) 038.

[45] N. Greiner, S. Höhe, G. Luisoni, M. Schönherr, J. Winter, and V. Yundin, Phenomenological analysis of Higgs boson production through gluon fusion in association with jets, J. High Energy Phys. **01** (2016) 169.

[46] T. Neumann and C. Williams, Higgs bosons at high $p_T$, Phys. Rev. D **95**, 014004 (2017).

[47] N. Greiner, S. Höhe, G. Luisoni, M. Schönherr, and J. Winter, Full mass dependence in Higgs boson production in association with jets at the LHC and FCC, J. High Energy Phys. **01** (2017) 091.

[48] M. Cacciari, F. A. Dreyer, A. Karlberg, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi, Fully Differential Vector-Boson-Fusion Higgs Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. **115**, 082002 (2015).

[49] F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg, Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Production at Three Loops in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. **117**, 072001 (2016).

[50] CMS Collaboration, Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector, J. Instrum. **12**, P10003 (2017).

[51] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-$k_t$ jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. **04** (2008) 063.

[52] D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, Pileup per particle identification, J. High Energy Phys. **10** (2014) 059.

[53] D. Krohn, J. Thaler, and L. Wang, Jet trimming, J. High Energy Phys. **02** (2010) 084.

[54] M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani, and G. P. Salam, Towards an understanding of jet substructure, J. High Energy Phys. **09** (2013) 029.

[55] A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, Soft drop, J. High Energy Phys. **05** (2014) 146.

[56] CMS Collaboration, CMS Physics Analysis Summary Report No. CMS-PAS-JME-16-003, 2017.

[57] J. Dolen, P. Harris, S. Marzani, S. Rappoccio, and N. Tran, Thinking outside the ROCs: Designing Decorrelated Taggers (DDT) for jet substructure, J. High Energy Phys. **05** (2016) 156.

[58] I. Moult, L. Necib, and J. Thaler, New angles on energy correlation functions, J. High Energy Phys. **12** (2016) 153.

[59] A. J. Larkoski, G. P. Salam, and J. Thaler, Energy correlation functions for jet substructure, J. High Energy Phys. **06** (2013) 108.

[60] J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg, Identifying boosted objects with N-subjettiness, J. High Energy Phys. **03** (2011) 015.

[61] CMS Collaboration, Identification of Double-$b$ Quark Jets in Boosted Event Topologies, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-BTV-15-002 (CERN, Geneva, 2016).

[62] R. A. Fisher, On the interpretation of $\chi^2$ from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, J. R. Stat. Soc. **85**, 87 (1922).

[63] See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.071802 for details on the systematic uncertainties associated with the jet mass scale, the jet mass resolution, and the $N_2^{1, DDT}$ selection.

[64] M. Bahr, S. Gieseke, M. A. Gigg, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton, O. Latunde-Dada, S. Platzer, P. Richardson, M. H. Seymour, A. Sherstnev, J. Tully, and B. R. Webber, Herwig++ physics and manual, Eur. Phys. J. C **58**, 639 (2008).

[65] CMS Collaboration, Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS, J. Instrum. **6**, P11002 (2011).

[66] CMS Collaboration, CMS Physics Analysis Summary Report No. CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 2017.

[67] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the cross-section of high transverse momentum vector bosons reconstructed as single jets and studies of jet substructure in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV with the ATLAS detector, New J. Phys. **16**, 113013 (2014).

A. M. Sirunyan,¹ A. Tumasyan,¹ W. Adam,² F. Ambrogi,² E. Asilar,² T. Bergauer,² J. Brandstetter,² E. Brondolin,² M. Dragicevic,² J. Erö,² M. Flechl,² M. Friedl,² R. Frühwirth,²,ᵇ V. M. Ghete,² J. Grossmann,² J. Hrubec,² M. Jeitler,²,ᵇ A. König,² N. Krammer,² I. Krätschmer,² D. Liko,² T. Madlener,² I. Mikulec,² E. Pree,² N. Rad,² H. Rohringer,² J. Schieck,²,ᵇ R. Schöfbeck,² M. Spanring,² D. Spitzbart,² W. Waltenberger,² J. Wittmann,² C.-E. Wulz,²,ᵇ M. Zarucki,² V. Chekhovsky,³ Y. Dydyshka,³ J. Suarez Gonzalez,³ E. A. De Wolf,⁴ D. Di Croce,⁴ X. Janssen,⁴ J. Lauwers,⁴ M. Van De Klundert,⁴ H. Van Haevermaet,⁴ P. Van Mechelen,⁴ N. Van Remortel,⁴ S. Abu Zeid,⁵ F. Blekman,⁵ J. D'Hondt,⁵ I. De Bruyn,⁵ J. De Clercq,⁵ K. Deroover,⁵ G. Flouris,⁵ D. Lontkovskyi,⁵ S. Lowette,⁵ S. Moortgat,⁵ L. Moreels,⁵ Q. Python,⁵ K. Skovpen,⁵ S. Tavernier,⁵ W. Van Doninck,⁵ P. Van Mulders,⁵ I. Van Parijs,⁵ D. Beghin,⁶ H. Brun,⁶ B. Clerbaux,⁶ G. De Lentdecker,⁶ H. Delannoy,⁶ B. Dorney,⁶ G. Fasanella,⁶ L. Favart,⁶ R. Goldouzian,⁶ A. Grebenyuk,⁶ G. Karapostoli,⁶ T. Lenzi,⁶ J. Luetic,⁶ T. Maerschalk,⁶ A. Marinov,⁶ A. Randle-conde,⁶ T. Seva,⁶ E. Starling,⁶
C. Vander Velde,⁶ P. Vanlaer,⁶ D. Vannerom,⁶ R. Yonamine,⁶ F. Zenoni,⁶ F. Zhang,⁶,c A. Cimmino,⁷ T. Cornelis,⁷ D. Dobur,⁷
A. Fagot,⁷ M. Gul,⁷ I. Khvastunov,⁷,d D. Poyraz,⁷ C. Roskas,⁷ S. Salva,⁷ M. Tytgat,⁷ W. Verbeke,⁷ N. Zaganidis,⁷

H. Bakhshiansohi,⁸ O. Bondu,⁸ S. Brochet,⁸ G. Bruno,⁸ C. Caputo,⁸ A. Caudron,⁸ P. David,⁸ S. De Visscher,⁸ C. Delaere,⁸
M. Delcourt,⁸ B. Francois,⁸ A. Giammanco,⁸ M. Komm,⁸ G. Krintiras,⁸ V. Lemaitre,⁸ A. Magitteri,⁸ A. Mertens,⁸
M. Musich,⁸ K. Piotrzkowski,⁸ L. Quertenmont,⁸ A. Saggio,⁸ M. Vidal Marono,⁸ S. Wertz,⁸ J. Zobec,⁸ N. Beliy,⁹

W. L. Aldá Júnior,¹⁰ F. L. Alves,¹⁰ G. A. Alves,¹⁰ L. Brito,¹⁰ M. Correa Martins Junior,¹⁰ C. Hensel,¹⁰ A. Moraes,¹⁰
M. E. Pol,¹⁰ P. Rebello Teles,¹⁰ E. Belchior Batista Das Chagas,¹¹ W. Carvalho,¹¹ J. Chinellato,¹¹,e E. Coelho,¹¹

E. M. Da Costa,¹¹ G. G. Da Silveira,¹¹,f D. De Jesus Damiao,¹¹ S. Fonseca De Souza,¹¹ L. M. Huertas Guativa,¹¹

H. Malbouisson,¹¹ M. Melo De Almeida,¹¹ C. Mora Herrera,¹¹ L. Mundim,¹¹ H. Nogima,¹¹ L. J. Sanchez Rosas,¹¹

A. Santoro,¹¹ A. Sznajder,¹¹ M. Thiel,¹¹ E. J. Tonelli Manganote,¹¹,e F. Torres Da Silva De Araujo,¹¹ A. Vilela Pereira,¹¹

S. Ahuja,¹²a C. A. Bernardes,¹²a T. R. Fernandez Perez Tomei,¹²a E. M. Gregores,¹²b P. G. Mercadante,¹²b S. F. Novaes,¹²a
Sandra S. Padula,¹²a D. Romero Abad,¹²b J. C. Ruiz Vargas,¹²a A. Aleksandrov,¹³ R. Hadjiiska,¹³ P. Iaydjiev,¹³

M. Misheva,¹³ M. Rodozov,¹³ M. Shopova,¹³ G. Sultanov,¹³ A. Dimitrov,¹⁴ I. Glushkov,¹⁴ L. Litov,¹⁴ B. Pavlov,¹⁴

P. Petkov,¹⁴ W. Fang,¹⁵,g X. Gao,¹⁵,g L. Yuan,¹⁵ M. Ahmad,¹⁶ J. G. Bian,¹⁶ G. M. Chen,¹⁶ H. S. Chen,¹⁶ M. Chen,¹⁶

Y. Chen,¹⁶ C. H. Jiang,¹⁶ D. Leggat,¹⁶ H. Liao,¹⁶ Z. Liu,¹⁶ F. Romeo,¹⁶ S. M. Shaheen,¹⁶ A. Spiezia,¹⁶ J. Tao,¹⁶ C. Wang,¹⁶

Z. Wang,¹⁶ E. Yazgan,¹⁶ H. Zhang,¹⁶ S. Zhang,¹⁶ J. Zhao,¹⁶ Y. Ban,¹⁷ G. Chen,¹⁷ Q. Li,¹⁷ S. Liu,¹⁷ Y. Mao,¹⁷ S. J. Qian,¹⁷
D. Wang,¹⁷ Z. Xu,¹⁷ C. Avila,¹⁸ A. Cabrera,¹⁸ L. F. Chaparro Sierra,¹⁸ C. Florez,¹⁸ C. F. González Hernández,¹⁸

J. D. Ruiz Alvarez,¹⁸ B. Courbon,¹⁹ N. Godinovic,¹⁹ D. Lelas,¹⁹ I. Puljak,¹⁹ P. M. Ribeiro Cipriano,¹⁹ T. Sculac,¹⁹

Z. Antunovic,²⁰ M. Kovac,²⁰ V. Brigljevic,²¹ D. Ferencek,²¹ K. Kadija,²¹ B. Mesic,²¹ A. Starodumov,²¹,h T. Susa,²¹
M. W. Ather,²² A. Attikis,²² G. Mavromanolakis,²² J. Mousa,²² C. Nicolaou,²² F. Ptochos,²² P. A. Razis,²²

H. Rykaczewski,²² M. Finger,²³,i M. Finger Jr.,²³,i E. Carrera Jarrin,²⁴ Y. Assran,²⁵,j,k M. A. Mahmoud,²⁵,l,k A. Mahrous,²⁵,m

R. K. Dewanjee,²⁶ M. Kadastik,²⁶ L. Perrini,²⁶ M. Raidal,²⁶ A. Tiko,²⁶ C. Veelken,²⁶ P. Eerola,²⁷ H. Kirschenmann,²⁷

J. Pekkanen,²⁷ M. Voutilainen,²⁷ T. Järvinen,²⁸ V. Karimäki,²⁸ R. Kinnunen,²⁸ T. Lampén,²⁸ K. Lassila-Perini,²⁸ S. Lehti,²⁸
T. Lindén,²⁸ P. Luukka,²⁸ E. Tuominen,²⁸ J. Tuominiemi,²⁸ J. Talvitie,²⁹ T. Tuuva,²⁹ M. Besancon,³⁰ F. Couderc,³⁰

M. Dejardin,³⁰ D. Denegri,³⁰ J. L. Faure,³⁰ F. Ferri,³⁰ S. Ganjour,³⁰ S. Ghosh,³⁰ A. Givernaud,³⁰ P. Gras,³⁰

G. Hamel de Monchenault,³⁰ P. Jarry,³⁰ I. Kucher,³⁰ C. Leloup,³⁰ E. Locci,³⁰ M. Machet,³⁰ J. Malcles,³⁰ G. Negro,³⁰

J. Rander,³⁰ A. Rosowsky,³⁰ M. Ö. Sahin,³⁰ M. Titov,³⁰ A. Abdulsalam,³¹ C. Amendola,³¹ I. Antropov,³¹ S. Baffioni,³¹

F. Beaudette,³¹ P. Busson,³¹ L. Cadamuro,³¹ C. Charlot,³¹ R. Granier de Cassagnac,³¹ M. Jo,³¹ S. Lisniak,³¹ A. Lobanov,³¹

J. Martin Blanco,³¹ M. Nguyen,³¹ C. Ochando,³¹ G. Ortona,³¹ P. Paganini,³¹ P. Pigard,³¹ R. Salerno,³¹ J. B. Sauvan,³¹

Y. Sirois,³¹ A. G. Stahl Leiton,³¹ T. Strebler,³¹ Y. Yilmaz,³¹ A. Zabi,³¹ A. Zghiche,³¹ J.-L. Agram,³²,n J. Andrea,³² D. Bloch,³²

J.-M. Brom,³² M. Buttignol,³² E. C. Chabert,³² N. Chanon,³² C. Collard,³² E. Conte,³²,n X. Coubez,³² J.-C. Fontaine,³²,n
D. Gelé,³² U. Goerlach,³² M. Jansová,³² A.-C. Le Bihan,³² N. Tonon,³² P. Van Hove,³² S. Gadrat,³³ S. Beauceron,³⁴

C. Bernet,³⁴ G. Boudoul,³⁴ R. Chierici,³⁴ D. Contardo,³⁴ P. Depasse,³⁴ H. El Mamouni,³⁴ J. Fay,³⁴ L. Finco,³⁴ S. Gascon,³⁴

M. Gouzevitch,³⁴ G. Grenier,³⁴ B. Ille,³⁴ F. Lagarde,³⁴ I. B. Laktineh,³⁴ M. Lethuillier,³⁴ L. Mirabito,³⁴ A. L. Pequegnot,³⁴
S. Perries,³⁴ A. Popov,³⁴,o V. Sordini,³⁴ M. Vander Donckt,³⁴ S. Viret,³⁴ A. Khvedelidze,³⁵,i Z. Tsamalaidze,³⁶,i

C. Autermann,³⁷ L. Feld,³⁷ M. K. Kiesel,³⁷ K. Klein,³⁷ M. Lipinski,³⁷ M. Preuten,³⁷ C. Schomakers,³⁷ J. Schulz,³⁷

T. Verlage,³⁷ V. Zhukov,³⁷,o A. Albert,³⁸ E. Dietz-Laursonn,³⁸ D. Duchardt,³⁸ M. Endres,³⁸ M. Erdmann,³⁸ S. Erdweg,³⁸
T. Esch,³⁸ R. Fischer,³⁸ A. Güth,³⁸ M. Hamer,³⁸ T. Hebbeker,³⁸ C. Heidemann,³⁸ K. Hoepfner,³⁸ S. Knutzen,³⁸

M. Merschmeyer,³⁸ A. Meyer,³⁸ P. Millet,³⁸ S. Mukherjee,³⁸ T. Pook,³⁸ M. Radziej,³⁸ H. Reithler,³⁸ M. Rieger,³⁸

F. Scheuch,³⁸ D. Teyssier,³⁸ S. Thüer,³⁸ G. Flügge,³⁹ B. Kargoll,³⁹ T. Kress,³⁹ A. Künsken,³⁹ J. Lingemann,³⁹ T. Müller,³⁹
A. Nehrkorn,³⁹ A. Nowack,³⁹ C. Pistone,³⁹ O. Pooth,³⁹ A. Stahl,³⁹,p M. Aldaya Martin,⁴⁰ T. Arndt,⁴⁰

C. Asawatangtrakuldee,⁴⁰ K. Beernaert,⁴⁰ O. Behnke,⁴⁰ U. Behrens,⁴⁰ A. Bermúdez Martínez,⁴⁰ A. A. Bin Anuar,⁴⁰

K. Borras,⁴⁰,q V. Botta,⁴⁰ A. Campbell,⁴⁰ P. Connor,⁴⁰ C. Contreras-Campana,⁴⁰ F. Costanza,⁴⁰ C. Diez Pardos,⁴⁰

G. Eckerlin,⁴⁰ D. Eckstein,⁴⁰ T. Eichhorn,⁴⁰ E. Eren,⁴⁰ E. Gallo,⁴⁰,r J. Garay Garcia,⁴⁰ A. Geiser,⁴⁰ A. Gizhko,⁴⁰

J. M. Grados Luyando,⁴⁰ A. Grohsjean,⁴⁰ P. Gunnellini,⁴⁰ M. Guthoff,⁴⁰ A. Harb,⁴⁰ J. Hauk,⁴⁰ M. Hempel,⁴⁰,s H. Jung,⁴⁰

A. Kalogeropoulos,⁴⁰ M. Kasemann,⁴⁰ J. Keaveney,⁴⁰ C. Kleinwort,⁴⁰ I. Korol,⁴⁰ D. Krücker,⁴⁰ W. Lange,⁴⁰ A. Lelek,⁴⁰

T. Lenz,⁴⁰ J. Leonard,⁴⁰ K. Lipka,⁴⁰ W. Lohmann,⁴⁰,s R. Mankel,⁴⁰ I.-A. Melzer-Pellmann,⁴⁰ A. B. Meyer,⁴⁰ G. Mittag,⁴⁰
J. Mnich,⁴⁰ A. Mussgiller,⁴⁰ E. Ntomari,⁴⁰ D. Pitzl,⁴⁰ A. Raspereza,⁴⁰ B. Roland,⁴⁰ M. Savitsky,⁴⁰ P. Saxena,⁴⁰

R. Shevchenko,⁴⁰ S. Spannagel,⁴⁰ N. Stefaniuk,⁴⁰ G. P. Van Onsem,⁴⁰ R. Walsh,⁴⁰ Y. Wen,⁴⁰ K. Wichmann,⁴⁰ C. Wissing,⁴⁰
O. Zenaiev,⁴⁰ R. Aggleton,⁴¹ S. Bein,⁴¹ V. Blobel,⁴¹ M. Centis Vignali,⁴¹ T. Dreyer,⁴¹ E. Garutti,⁴¹ D. Gonzalez,⁴¹ J. Haller,⁴¹

A. Hinzmann,⁴¹ M. Hoffmann,⁴¹ A. Karavdina,⁴¹ R. Klanner,⁴¹ R. Kogler,⁴¹ N. Kovalchuk,⁴¹ S. Kurz,⁴¹ T. Lapsien,⁴¹

I. Marchesini,⁴¹ D. Marconi,⁴¹ M. Meyer,⁴¹ M. Niedziela,⁴¹ D. Nowatschin,⁴¹ F. Pantaleo,⁴¹,p T. Peiffer,⁴¹ A. Perieanu,⁴¹

C. Scharf,⁴¹ P. Schleper,⁴¹ A. Schmidt,⁴¹ S. Schumann,⁴¹ J. Schwandt,⁴¹ J. Sonneveld,⁴¹ H. Stadie,⁴¹ G. Steinbrück,⁴¹

F. M. Stober,⁴¹ M. Stöver,⁴¹ H. Tholen,⁴¹ D. Troendle,⁴¹ E. Usai,⁴¹ L. Vanelderen,⁴¹ A. Vanhoefer,⁴¹ B. Vormwald,⁴¹

M. Akbiyik,⁴² C. Barth,⁴² S. Baur,⁴² E. Butz,⁴² R. Caspart,⁴² T. Chwalek,⁴² F. Colombo,⁴² W. De Boer,⁴² A. Dierlamm,⁴²

B. Freund,⁴² R. Friese,⁴² M. Giffels,⁴² D. Haitz,⁴² M. A. Harrendorf,⁴² F. Hartmann,⁴²,p S. M. Heindl,⁴² U. Husemann,⁴²

F. Kassel,⁴²,p S. Kudella,⁴² H. Mildner,⁴² M. U. Mozer,⁴² Th. Müller,⁴² M. Plagge,⁴² G. Quast,⁴² K. Rabbertz,⁴²

M. Schröder,⁴² I. Shvetsov,⁴² G. Sieber,⁴² H. J. Simonis,⁴² R. Ulrich,⁴² S. Wayand,⁴² M. Weber,⁴² T. Weiler,⁴²

S. Williamson,⁴² C. Wöhrmann,⁴² R. Wolf,⁴² G. Anagnostou,⁴³ G. Daskalakis,⁴³ T. Geralis,⁴³ V. A. Giakoumopoulou,⁴³

A. Kyriakis,⁴³ D. Loukas,⁴³ I. Topsis-Giotis,⁴³ G. Karathanasis,⁴⁴ S. Kesisoglou,⁴⁴ A. Panagiotou,⁴⁴ N. Saoulidou,⁴⁴

K. Kousouris,⁴⁵ I. Evangelou,⁴⁶ C. Foudas,⁴⁶ P. Kokkas,⁴⁶ S. Mallios,⁴⁶ N. Manthos,⁴⁶ I. Papadopoulos,⁴⁶ E. Paradas,⁴⁶

J. Strologas,⁴⁶ F. A. Triantis,⁴⁶ M. Csanad,⁴⁷ N. Filipovic,⁴⁷ G. Pasztor,⁴⁷ O. Surányi,⁴⁷ G. I. Veres,⁴⁷,t G. Bencze,⁴⁸

C. Hajdu,⁴⁸ D. Horvath,⁴⁸,u Á. Hunyadi,⁴⁸ F. Sikler,⁴⁸ V. Veszpremi,⁴⁸ A. J. Zsigmond,⁴⁸ N. Beni,⁴⁹ S. Czellar,⁴⁹

J. Karancsi,⁴⁹,v A. Makovec,⁴⁹ J. Molnar,⁴⁹ Z. Szillasi,⁴⁹ M. Bartók,⁵⁰,t P. Raics,⁵⁰ Z. L. Trocsanyi,⁵⁰ B. Ujvari,⁵⁰

S. Choudhury,⁵¹ J. R. Komaragiri,⁵¹ S. Bahinipati,⁵²,w S. Bhowmik,⁵² P. Mal,⁵² K. Mandal,⁵² A. Nayak,⁵²,x D. K. Sahoo,⁵²,w

N. Sahoo,⁵² S. K. Swain,⁵² S. Bansal,⁵³ S. B. Beri,⁵³ V. Bhatnagar,⁵³ R. Chawla,⁵³ N. Dhingra,⁵³ A. K. Kalsi,⁵³ A. Kaur,⁵³

M. Kaur,⁵³ S. Kaur,⁵³ R. Kumar,⁵³ P. Kumari,⁵³ A. Mehta,⁵³ J. B. Singh,⁵³ G. Walia,⁵³ Ashok Kumar,⁵⁴ Aashaq Shah,⁵⁴

A. Bhardwaj,⁵⁴ S. Chauhan,⁵⁴ B. C. Choudhary,⁵⁴ R. B. Garg,⁵⁴ S. Keshri,⁵⁴ A. Kumar,⁵⁴ S. Malhotra,⁵⁴ M. Naimuddin,⁵⁴

K. Ranjan,⁵⁴ R. Sharma,⁵⁴ R. Bhardwaj,⁵⁵ R. Bhattacharya,⁵⁵ S. Bhattacharya,⁵⁵ U. Bhawandeep,⁵⁵ S. Dey,⁵⁵ S. Dutt,⁵⁵

S. Dutta,⁵⁵ S. Ghosh,⁵⁵ N. Majumdar,⁵⁵ A. Modak,⁵⁵ K. Mondal,⁵⁵ S. Mukhopadhyay,⁵⁵ S. Nandan,⁵⁵ A. Purohit,⁵⁵ A. Roy,⁵⁵

D. Roy,⁵⁵ S. Roy Chowdhury,⁵⁵ S. Sarkar,⁵⁵ M. Sharan,⁵⁵ S. Thakur,⁵⁵ P. K. Behera,⁵⁶ R. Chudasama,⁵⁷ D. Dutta,⁵⁷ V. Jha,⁵⁷

V. Kumar,⁵⁷ A. K. Mohanty,⁵⁷,p P. K. Netrakanti,⁵⁷ L. M. Pant,⁵⁷ P. Shukla,⁵⁷ A. Topkar,⁵⁷ T. Aziz,⁵⁸ S. Dugad,⁵⁸

B. Mahakud,⁵⁸ S. Mitra,⁵⁸ G. B. Mohanty,⁵⁸ N. Sur,⁵⁸ B. Sutar,⁵⁸ S. Banerjee,⁵⁹ S. Bhattacharya,⁵⁹ S. Chatterjee,⁵⁹ P. Das,⁵⁹

M. Guchait,⁵⁹ Sa. Jain,⁵⁹ S. Kumar,⁵⁹ M. Maity,⁵⁹,y G. Majumder,⁵⁹ K. Mazumdar,⁵⁹ T. Sarkar,⁵⁹,y N. Wickramage,⁵⁹,z

S. Chauhan,⁶⁰ S. Dube,⁶⁰ V. Hegde,⁶⁰ A. Kapoor,⁶⁰ K. Kotthekar,⁶⁰ S. Pandey,⁶⁰ A. Rane,⁶⁰ S. Sharma,⁶⁰ S. Chenarani,⁶¹,aa

E. Eskandari Tadavani,⁶¹ S. M. Etesami,⁶¹,aa M. Khakzad,⁶¹ M. Mohammadi Najafabadi,⁶¹ M. Naseri,⁶¹

S. Paktinat Mehdiabadi,⁶¹,bb F. Rezaei Hosseinabadi,⁶¹ B. Safarzadeh,⁶¹,cc M. Zeinali,⁶¹ M. Felcini,⁶² M. Grunewald,⁶²

M. Abbrescia,⁶³a,⁶³b C. Calabria,⁶³a,⁶³b A. Colaleo,⁶³a D. Creanza,⁶³a,⁶³c L. Cristella,⁶³a,⁶³b N. De Filippis,⁶³a,⁶³c

M. De Palma,⁶³a,⁶³b F. Errico,⁶³a,⁶³b L. Fiore,⁶³a G. Iaselli,⁶³a,⁶³c S. Lezki,⁶³a,⁶³b G. Maggi,⁶³a,⁶³c M. Maggi,⁶³a

G. Miniello,⁶³a,⁶³b S. My,⁶³a,⁶³b S. Nuzzo,⁶³a,⁶³b A. Pompili,⁶³a,⁶³b G. Pugliese,⁶³a,⁶³c R. Radogna,⁶³a A. Ranieri,⁶³a

G. Selvaggi,⁶³a,⁶³b A. Sharma,⁶³a L. Silvestris,⁶³a,p R. Venditti,⁶³a P. Verwilligen,⁶³a G. Abbiendi,⁶⁴a C. Battilana,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b

D. Bonacorsi,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b L. Borgonovi,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b S. Braibant-Giacomelli,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b R. Campanini,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b P. Capiluppi,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b

A. Castro,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b F. R. Cavallo,⁶⁴a S. S. Chhibra,⁶⁴a G. Codispoti,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b M. Cuffiani,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b G. M. Dallavalle,⁶⁴a F. Fabbri,⁶⁴a

A. Fanfani,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b D. Fasanella,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b P. Giacomelli,⁶⁴a C. Grandi,⁶⁴a L. Guiducci,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b S. Marcellini,⁶⁴a G. Masetti,⁶⁴a

A. Montanari,⁶⁴a F. L. Navarria,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b A. Perrotta,⁶⁴a A. M. Rossi,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b T. Rovelli,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b G. P. Siroli,⁶⁴a,⁶⁴b N. Tosi,⁶⁴a

S. Albergo,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b S. Costa,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b A. Di Mattia,⁶⁵a F. Giordano,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b R. Potenza,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b A. Tricomi,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b C. Tuve,⁶⁵a,⁶⁵b

G. Barbagli,⁶⁶a K. Chatterjee,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b V. Ciulli,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b C. Civinini,⁶⁶a R. D'Alessandro,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b E. Focardi,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b P. Lenzi,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b

M. Meschini,⁶⁶a S. Paoletti,⁶⁶a L. Russo,⁶⁶a,dd G. Sguazzoni,⁶⁶a D. Strom,⁶⁶a L. Viliani,⁶⁶a,⁶⁶b,p L. Benussi,⁶⁷ S. Bianco,⁶⁷

F. Fabbri,⁶⁷ D. Piccolo,⁶⁷ F. Primavera,⁶⁷,p V. Calvelli,⁶⁸a,⁶⁸b F. Ferro,⁶⁸a E. Robutti,⁶⁸a S. Tosi,⁶⁸a,⁶⁸b A. Benaglia,⁶⁹a

L. Brianza,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b F. Brivio,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b V. Ciriolo,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b M. E. Dinardo,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b S. Fiorendi,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b S. Gennai,⁶⁹a A. Ghezzi,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b

P. Govoni,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b M. Malberti,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b S. Malvezzi,⁶⁹a R. A. Manzoni,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b D. Menasce,⁶⁹a L. Moroni,⁶⁹a M. Paganoni,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b

K. Pauwels,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b D. Pedrini,⁶⁹a S. Pigazzini,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b,ee S. Ragazzi,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b N. Redaelli,⁶⁹a T. Tabarelli de Fatis,⁶⁹a,⁶⁹b

S. Buontempo,⁷⁰a N. Cavallo,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰c S. Di Guida,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰d,p F. Fabozzi,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰c F. Fienga,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰b A. O. M. Iorio,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰b

W. A. Khan,⁷⁰a L. Lista,⁷⁰a S. Meola,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰d,p P. Paolucci,⁷⁰a,p C. Sciacca,⁷⁰a,⁷⁰b F. Thyssen,⁷⁰a P. Azzi,⁷¹a N. Bacchetta,⁷¹a

L. Benato,⁷¹a,⁷¹b M. Biasotto,⁷¹a,ff D. Bisello,⁷¹a,⁷¹b A. Boletti,⁷¹a,⁷¹b R. Carlin,⁷¹a,⁷¹b A. Carvalho Antunes De Oliveira,⁷¹a,⁷¹b

P. Checchia,⁷¹a M. Dall'Ostro,⁷¹a,⁷¹b P. De Castro Manzano,⁷¹a T. Dorigo,⁷¹a U. Gasparini,⁷¹a,⁷¹b A. Gozzelino,⁷¹a

S. Lacaprara,⁷¹a P. Lujan,⁷¹a M. Margoni,⁷¹a,⁷¹b A. T. Meneguzzo,⁷¹a,⁷¹b N. Pozzobon,⁷¹a,⁷¹b P. Ronchese,⁷¹a,⁷¹b

R. Rossin,⁷¹a,⁷¹b F. Simonetto,⁷¹a,⁷¹b E. Torassa,⁷¹a S. Ventura,⁷¹a M. Zanetti,⁷¹a,⁷¹b P. Zotto,⁷¹a,⁷¹b A. Braghieri,⁷²a
A. Magnani,⁷²a P. Montagna,⁷²a,⁷²b S. P. Ratti,⁷²a,⁷²b V. Re,⁷²a M. Ressegotti,⁷²a,⁷²b C. Riccardi,⁷²a,⁷²b P. Salvini,⁷²a I. Vai,⁷²a,⁷²b P. Vitulo,⁷²a,⁷²b L. Alunni Solestizi,⁷³a,⁷³b M. Biasini,⁷³a,⁷³b G. M. Bilei,⁷³a C. Cecchi,⁷³a,⁷³b D. Ciangottini,⁷³a,⁷³b

L. Fanò,⁷³a,⁷³b P. Lariccia,⁷³a,⁷³b R. Leonardi,⁷³a,⁷³b E. Manoni,⁷³a G. Mantovani,⁷³a,⁷³b V. Mariani,⁷³a,⁷³b M. Menichelli,⁷³a

A. Rossi,⁷³a,⁷³b A. Santocchia,⁷³a,⁷³b D. Spiga,⁷³a K. Androsov,⁷⁴a P. Azzurri,⁷⁴a,p G. Bagliesi,⁷⁴a T. Boccali,⁷⁴a L. Borrello,⁷⁴a R. Castaldi,⁷⁴a M. A. Ciocci,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴b R. Dell'Orso,⁷⁴a G. Fedi,⁷⁴a L. Giannini,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴c A. Giassi,⁷⁴a M. T. Grippo,⁷⁴a,dd

F. Ligabue,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴c T. Lomtadze,⁷⁴a E. Manca,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴c G. Mandorli,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴c L. Martini,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴b A. Messineo,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴b F. Palla,⁷⁴a

A. Rizzi,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴b A. Savoy-Navarro,⁷⁴a,gg P. Spagnolo,⁷⁴a R. Tenchini,⁷⁴a G. Tonelli,⁷⁴a,⁷⁴b A. Venturi,⁷⁴a P. G. Verdini,⁷⁴a

L. Barone,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b F. Cavallari,⁷⁵a M. Cipriani,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b N. Daci,⁷⁵a D. Del Re,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b,p E. Di Marco,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b M. Diemoz,⁷⁵a

S. Gelli,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b E. Longo,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b F. Margaroli,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b B. Marzocchi,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b P. Meridiani,⁷⁵a G. Organtini,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b R. Paramatti,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b F. Preiato,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b S. Rahatlou,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b C. Rovelli,⁷⁵a F. Santanastasio,⁷⁵a,⁷⁵b N. Amapane,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b R. Arcidiacono,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶c

S. Argiro,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b M. Arneodo,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶c N. Bartosik,⁷⁶a R. Bellan,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b C. Biino,⁷⁶a N. Cartiglia,⁷⁶a F. Cenna,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b

M. Costa,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b R. Covarelli,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b A. Degano,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b N. Demaria,⁷⁶a B. Kiani,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b C. Mariotti,⁷⁶a S. Maselli,⁷⁶a

E. Migliore,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b V. Monaco,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b E. Monteil,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b M. Monteno,⁷⁶a M. M. Obertino,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b L. Pacher,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b N. Pastrone,⁷⁶a M. Pelliccioni,⁷⁶a G. L. Pinna Angioni,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b F. Ravera,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b A. Romero,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b M. Ruspa,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶c R. Sacchi,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b

K. Shchelina,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b V. Sola,⁷⁶a A. Solano,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b A. Staiano,⁷⁶a P. Traczyk,⁷⁶a,⁷⁶b S. Belforte,⁷⁷a M. Casarsa,⁷⁷a F. Cossutti,⁷⁷a

G. Della Ricca,⁷⁷a,⁷⁷b A. Zanetti,⁷⁷a D. H. Kim,⁷⁸ G. N. Kim,⁷⁸ M. S. Kim,⁷⁸ J. Lee,⁷⁸ S. Lee,⁷⁸ S. W. Lee,⁷⁸ C. S. Moon,⁷⁸

Y. D. Oh,⁷⁸ S. Sekmen,⁷⁸ D. C. Son,⁷⁸ Y. C. Yang,⁷⁸ A. Lee,⁷⁹ H. Kim,⁸⁰ D. H. Moon,⁸⁰ G. Oh,⁸⁰ J. A. Brochero Cifuentes,⁸¹

J. Goh,⁸¹ T. J. Kim,⁸¹ S. Cho,⁸² S. Choi,⁸² Y. Go,⁸² D. Gyun,⁸² S. Ha,⁸² B. Hong,⁸² Y. Jo,⁸² Y. Kim,⁸² K. Lee,⁸² K. S. Lee,⁸²

S. Lee,⁸² J. Lim,⁸² S. K. Park,⁸² Y. Roh,⁸² J. Almond,⁸³ J. Kim,⁸³ J. S. Kim,⁸³ H. Lee,⁸³ K. Lee,⁸³ K. Nam,⁸³ S. B. Oh,⁸³

B. C. Radburn-Smith,⁸³ S. h. Seo,⁸³ U. K. Yang,⁸³ H. D. Yoo,⁸³ G. B. Yu,⁸³ M. Choi,⁸⁴ H. Kim,⁸⁴ J. H. Kim,⁸⁴ J. S. H. Lee,⁸⁴ I. C. Park,⁸⁴ Y. Choi,⁸⁵ C. Hwang,⁸⁵ J. Lee,⁸⁵ I. Yu,⁸⁵ V. Dudenas,⁸⁶ A. Juodagalvis,⁸⁶ J. Vaitkus,⁸⁶ I. Ahmed,⁸⁷

Z. A. Ibrahim,⁸⁷ M. A. B. Md Ali,⁸⁷,hh F. Mohamad Idris,⁸⁷,ii W. A. T. Wan Abdullah,⁸⁷ M. N. Yusli,⁸⁷ Z. Zolkapli,⁸⁷

R. Reyes-Almanza,⁸⁸ G. Ramirez-Sanchez,⁸⁸ M. C. Duran-Osuna,⁸⁸ H. Castilla-Valdez,⁸⁸ E. De La Cruz-Burelo,⁸⁸

I. Heredia-De La Cruz,⁸⁸,jj R. I. Rabadan-Trejo,⁸⁸ R. Lopez-Fernandez,⁸⁸ J. Mejia Guisao,⁸⁸ A. Sanchez-Hernandez,⁸⁸

S. Carrillo Moreno,⁸⁹ C. Oropeza Barrera,⁸⁹ F. Vazquez Valencia,⁸⁹ I. Pedraza,⁹⁰ H. A. Salazar Ibarguen,⁹⁰

C. Uribe Estrada,⁹⁰ A. Morelos Pineda,⁹¹ D. Krofcheck,⁹² P. H. Butler,⁹³ A. Ahmad,⁹⁴ M. Ahmad,⁹⁴ Q. Hassan,⁹⁴

H. R. Hoorani,⁹⁴ A. Saddique,⁹⁴ M. A. Shah,⁹⁴ M. Shoaib,⁹⁴ M. Waqas,⁹⁴ H. Bialkowska,⁹⁵ M. Bluj,⁹⁵ B. Boimska,⁹⁵

T. Frueboes,⁹⁵ M. Górski,⁹⁵ M. Kazana,⁹⁵ K. Nawrocki,⁹⁵ M. Szleper,⁹⁵ P. Zalewski,⁹⁵ K. Bunkowski,⁹⁶ A. Byszuk,⁹⁶,kk

K. Doroba,⁹⁶ A. Kalinowski,⁹⁶ M. Konecki,⁹⁶ J. Krolikowski,⁹⁶ M. Misiura,⁹⁶ M. Olszewski,⁹⁶ A. Pyskir,⁹⁶ M. Walczak,⁹⁶

P. Bargassa,⁹⁷ C. Beirão Da Cruz E Silva,⁹⁷ A. Di Francesco,⁹⁷ P. Faccioli,⁹⁷ B. Galinhas,⁹⁷ M. Gallinaro,⁹⁷ J. Hollar,⁹⁷

N. Leonardo,⁹⁷ L. Lloret Iglesias,⁹⁷ M. V. Nemallapudi,⁹⁷ J. Seixas,⁹⁷ G. Strong,⁹⁷ O. Toldaiev,⁹⁷ D. Vadruccio,⁹⁷ J. Varela,⁹⁷

S. Afanasiev,⁹⁸ P. Bunin,⁹⁸ M. Gavrilenko,⁹⁸ I. Golutvin,⁹⁸ I. Gorbunov,⁹⁸ A. Kamenev,⁹⁸ V. Karjavin,⁹⁸ A. Lanev,⁹⁸

A. Malakhov,⁹⁸ V. Matveev,⁹⁸,ll,mm V. Palichik,⁹⁸ V. Perelygin,⁹⁸ S. Shmatov,⁹⁸ S. Shulha,⁹⁸ N. Skatchkov,⁹⁸ V. Smirnov,⁹⁸

N. Voytishin,⁹⁸ A. Zarubin,⁹⁸ Y. Ivanov,⁹⁹ V. Kim,⁹⁹,nn E. Kuznetsova,⁹⁹,oo P. Levchenko,⁹⁹ V. Murzin,⁹⁹ V. Oreshkin,⁹⁹

I. Smirnov,⁹⁹ V. Sulimov,⁹⁹ L. Uvarov,⁹⁹ S. Vavilov,⁹⁹ A. Vorobyev,⁹⁹ Yu. Andreev,¹⁰⁰ A. Dermenev,¹⁰⁰ S. Gninenko,¹⁰⁰ N. Golubev,¹⁰⁰ A. Karneyeu,¹⁰⁰ M. Kirsanov,¹⁰⁰ N. Krasnikov,¹⁰⁰ A. Pashenkov,¹⁰⁰ D. Tlisov,¹⁰⁰ A. Toropin,¹⁰⁰

V. Epshteyn,¹⁰¹ V. Gavrilov,¹⁰¹ N. Lychkovskaya,¹⁰¹ V. Popov,¹⁰¹ I. Pozdnyakov,¹⁰¹ G. Safronov,¹⁰¹ A. Spiridonov,¹⁰¹

A. Stepennov,¹⁰¹ M. Toms,¹⁰¹ E. Vlasov,¹⁰¹ A. Zhokin,¹⁰¹ T. Aushev,¹⁰² A. Bylinkin,¹⁰²,mm R. Chistov,¹⁰³,pp M. Danilov,¹⁰³,pp

P. Parygin,¹⁰³ D. Philippov,¹⁰³ S. Polikarpov,¹⁰³ E. Tarkovskii,¹⁰³ V. Andreev,¹⁰⁴ M. Azarkin,¹⁰⁴,mm I. Dremin,¹⁰⁴,mm

M. Kirakosyan,¹⁰⁴,mm A. Terkulov,¹⁰⁴ A. Baskakov,¹⁰⁵ A. Belyaev,¹⁰⁵ E. Boos,¹⁰⁵ M. Dubinin,¹⁰⁵,qq L. Dudko,¹⁰⁵

A. Ershov,¹⁰⁵ A. Gribushin,¹⁰⁵ V. Klyukhin,¹⁰⁵ O. Kodolova,¹⁰⁵ I. Lokhtin,¹⁰⁵ I. Miagkov,¹⁰⁵ S. Obraztsov,¹⁰⁵

S. Petrushanko,¹⁰⁵ V. Savrin,¹⁰⁵ A. Snigirev,¹⁰⁵ V. Blinov,¹⁰⁶,rr Y. Skovpen,¹⁰⁶,rr D. Shtol,¹⁰⁶,rr I. Azhgirey,¹⁰⁷ I. Bayshev,¹⁰⁷

S. Bitioukov,¹⁰⁷ D. Elumakhov,¹⁰⁷ V. Kachanov,¹⁰⁷ A. Kalinin,¹⁰⁷ D. Konstantinov,¹⁰⁷ P. Mandrik,¹⁰⁷ V. Petrov,¹⁰⁷

R. Ryutin,¹⁰⁷ A. Sobol,¹⁰⁷ S. Troshin,¹⁰⁷ N. Tyurin,¹⁰⁷ A. Uzunian,¹⁰⁷ A. Volkov,¹⁰⁷ P. Adzic,¹⁰⁸,ss P. Cirkovic,¹⁰⁸

D. Devetak,¹⁰⁸ M. Dordevic,¹⁰⁸ J. Milosevic,¹⁰⁸ V. Rekovic,¹⁰⁸ J. Alcaraz Maestre,¹⁰⁹ M. Barrio Luna,¹⁰⁹ M. Cerrada,¹⁰⁹ N. Colino,¹⁰⁹ B. De La Cruz,¹⁰⁹ A. Delgado Peris,¹⁰⁹ A. Escalante Del Valle,¹⁰⁹ C. Fernandez Bedoya,¹⁰⁹

J. P. Fernández Ramos,¹⁰⁹ J. Flix,¹⁰⁹ M. C. Fouz,¹⁰⁹ P. Garcia-Abia,¹⁰⁹ O. Gonzalez Lopez,¹⁰⁹ S. Goy Lopez,¹⁰⁹

J. M. Hernandez,¹⁰⁹ M. I. Josa,¹⁰⁹ D. Moran,¹⁰⁹ A. Pérez-Calero Yzquierdo,¹⁰⁹ J. Puerta Pelayo,¹⁰⁹ A. Quintario Olmeda,¹⁰⁹

I. Redondo,¹⁰⁹ L. Romero,¹⁰⁹ M. S. Soares,¹⁰⁹ A. Álvarez Fernández,¹⁰⁹ C. Albajar,¹¹⁰ J. F. de Trocóniz,¹¹⁰ M. Missiroli,¹¹⁰
J. Cuevas,¹¹¹ C. Erice,¹¹¹ J. Fernandez Menendez,¹¹¹ I. Gonzalez Caballero,¹¹¹ J. R. González Fernández,¹¹¹

E. Palencia Cortezon,¹¹¹ S. Sanchez Cruz,¹¹¹ P. Vischia,¹¹¹ J. M. Vizan Garcia,¹¹¹ I. J. Cabrillo,¹¹² A. Calderon,¹¹²

B. Chazin Quero,¹¹² E. Curras,¹¹² J. Duarte Campderros,¹¹² M. Fernandez,¹¹² J. Garcia-Ferrero,¹¹² G. Gomez,¹¹²

A. Lopez Virto,¹¹² J. Marco,¹¹² C. Martinez Rivero,¹¹² P. Martinez Ruiz del Arbol,¹¹² F. Matorras,¹¹² J. Piedra Gomez,¹¹²

T. Rodrigo,¹¹² A. Ruiz-Jimeno,¹¹² L. Scodellaro,¹¹² N. Trevisani,¹¹² I. Vila,¹¹² R. Vilar Cortabitarte,¹¹² D. Abbaneo,¹¹³

B. Akgun,¹¹³ E. Auffray,¹¹³ P. Baillon,¹¹³ A. H. Ball,¹¹³ D. Barney,¹¹³ M. Bianco,¹¹³ P. Bloch,¹¹³ A. Bocci,¹¹³ C. Botta,¹¹³
T. Camporesi,¹¹³ R. Castello,¹¹³ M. Cepeda,¹¹³ G. Cerminara,¹¹³ E. Chapon,¹¹³ Y. Chen,¹¹³ D. d'Enterria,¹¹³

A. Dabrowski,¹¹³ V. Daponte,¹¹³ A. David,¹¹³ M. De Gruttola,¹¹³ A. De Roeck,¹¹³ N. Deelen,¹¹³ M. Dobson,¹¹³ T. du Pree,¹¹³

M. Dünser,¹¹³ N. Dupont,¹¹³ A. Elliott-Peisert,¹¹³ P. Everaerts,¹¹³ F. Fallavollita,¹¹³ G. Franzoni,¹¹³ J. Fulcher,¹¹³ W. Funk,¹¹³

D. Gigi,¹¹³ A. Gilbert,¹¹³ K. Gill,¹¹³ F. Glege,¹¹³ D. Gulhan,¹¹³ P. Harris,¹¹³ J. Hegeman,¹¹³ V. Innocente,¹¹³ A. Jafari,¹¹³
P. Janot,¹¹³ O. Karacheban,¹¹³s J. Kieseler,¹¹³ V. Knünz,¹¹³ A. Kornmayer,¹¹³ M. J. Kortelainen,¹¹³ M. Krammer,¹¹³b

C. Lange,¹¹³ P. Lecoq,¹¹³ C. Lourenço,¹¹³ M. T. Lucchini,¹¹³ L. Malgeri,¹¹³ M. Mannelli,¹¹³ A. Martelli,¹¹³ F. Meijers,¹¹³
J. A. Merlin,¹¹³ S. Mersi,¹¹³ E. Meschi,¹¹³ P. Milenovic,¹¹³tt F. Moortgat,¹¹³ M. Mulders,¹¹³ H. Neugebauer,¹¹³

J. Ngadiuba,¹¹³ S. Orfanelli,¹¹³ L. Orsini,¹¹³ L. Pape,¹¹³ E. Perez,¹¹³ M. Peruzzi,¹¹³ A. Petrilli,¹¹³ G. Petrucciani,¹¹³

A. Pfeiffer,¹¹³ M. Pierini,¹¹³ D. Rabady,¹¹³ A. Racz,¹¹³ T. Reis,¹¹³ G. Rolandi,¹¹³uu M. Rovere,¹¹³ H. Sakulin,¹¹³

C. Schäfer,¹¹³ C. Schwick,¹¹³ M. Seidel,¹¹³ M. Selvaggi,¹¹³ A. Sharma,¹¹³ P. Silva,¹¹³ P. Sphicas,¹¹³vv A. Stakia,¹¹³

J. Steggemann,¹¹³ M. Stoye,¹¹³ M. Tosi,¹¹³ D. Treille,¹¹³ A. Triossi,¹¹³ A. Tsirou,¹¹³ V. Veckalns,¹¹³ww M. Verweij,¹¹³

W. D. Zeuner,¹¹³ W. Bertl,¹¹⁴,α L. Caminada,¹¹⁴,xx K. Deiters,¹¹⁴ W. Erdmann,¹¹⁴ R. Horisberger,¹¹⁴ Q. Ingram,¹¹⁴

H. C. Kaestli,¹¹⁴ D. Kotlinski,¹¹⁴ U. Langenegger,¹¹⁴ T. Rohe,¹¹⁴ S. A. Wiederkehr,¹¹⁴ M. Backhaus,¹¹⁵ L. Bäni,¹¹⁵

P. Berger,¹¹⁵ L. Bianchini,¹¹⁵ B. Casal,¹¹⁵ G. Dissertori,¹¹⁵ M. Dittmar,¹¹⁵ M. Donegà,¹¹⁵ C. Dorfer,¹¹⁵ C. Grab,¹¹⁵

C. Heidegger,¹¹⁵ D. Hits,¹¹⁵ J. Hoss,¹¹⁵ G. Kasieczka,¹¹⁵ T. Klijnsma,¹¹⁵ W. Lustermann,¹¹⁵ B. Mangano,¹¹⁵

M. Marionneau,¹¹⁵ M. T. Meinhard,¹¹⁵ D. Meister,¹¹⁵ F. Micheli,¹¹⁵ P. Musella,¹¹⁵ F. Nessi-Tedaldi,¹¹⁵ F. Pandolfi,¹¹⁵

J. Pata,¹¹⁵ F. Pauss,¹¹⁵ G. Perrin,¹¹⁵ L. Perrozzi,¹¹⁵ M. Quittnat,¹¹⁵ M. Reichmann,¹¹⁵ D. A. Sanz Becerra,¹¹⁵

M. Schönenberger,¹¹⁵ L. Shchutska,¹¹⁵ V. R. Tavolaro,¹¹⁵ K. Theofilatos,¹¹⁵ M. L. Vesterbacka Olsson,¹¹⁵ R. Wallny,¹¹⁵

D. H. Zhu,¹¹⁵ T. K. Aarrestad,¹¹⁶ C. Amsler,¹¹⁶yy M. F. Canelli,¹¹⁶ A. De Cosa,¹¹⁶ R. Del Burgo,¹¹⁶ S. Donato,¹¹⁶

C. Galloni,¹¹⁶ T. Hreus,¹¹⁶ B. Kilminster,¹¹⁶ D. Pinna,¹¹⁶ G. Rauco,¹¹⁶ P. Robmann,¹¹⁶ D. Salerno,¹¹⁶ K. Schweiger,¹¹⁶

C. Seitz,¹¹⁶ Y. Takahashi,¹¹⁶ A. Zucchetta,¹¹⁶ V. Candelise,¹¹⁷ T. H. Doan,¹¹⁷ Sh. Jain,¹¹⁷ R. Khurana,¹¹⁷ C. M. Kuo,¹¹⁷

W. Lin,¹¹⁷ A. Pozdnyakov,¹¹⁷ S. S. Yu,¹¹⁷ Arun Kumar,¹¹⁸ P. Chang,¹¹⁸ Y. Chao,¹¹⁸ K. F. Chen,¹¹⁸ P. H. Chen,¹¹⁸ F. Fiori,¹¹⁸
W.-S. Hou,¹¹⁸ Y. Hsiung,¹¹⁸ Y. F. Liu,¹¹⁸ R.-S. Lu,¹¹⁸ E. Paganis,¹¹⁸ A. Psallidas,¹¹⁸ A. Steen,¹¹⁸ J. f. Tsai,¹¹⁸

B. Asavapibhop,¹¹⁹ K. Kovitanggoon,¹¹⁹ G. Singh,¹¹⁹ N. Srimanobhas,¹¹⁹ F. Boran,¹²⁰ S. Cerci,¹²⁰,zz S. Damarseckin,¹²⁰

Z. S. Demiroglu,¹²⁰ C. Dozen,¹²⁰ I. Dumanoglu,¹²⁰ S. Girgis,¹²⁰ G. Gokbulut,¹²⁰ Y. Guler,¹²⁰ I. Hos,¹²⁰,aaa E. E. Kangal,¹²⁰,bbb

O. Kara,¹²⁰ A. Kayis Topaksu,¹²⁰ U. Kiminsu,¹²⁰ M. Oglakci,¹²⁰ G. Onengut,¹²⁰,ccc K. Ozdemir,¹²⁰,ddd D. Sunar Cerci,¹²⁰,zz
B. Tali,¹²⁰,zz S. Turkcapar,¹²⁰ I. S. Zorbakir,¹²⁰ C. Zorbilmez,¹²⁰ B. Bilin,¹²¹ G. Karapinar,¹²¹,eee K. Ocalan,¹²¹,fff

M. Yalvac,¹²¹ M. Zeyrek,¹²¹ E. Gülmez,¹²² M. Kaya,¹²²,ggg O. Kaya,¹²²,hhh S. Tekten,¹²² E. A. Yetkin,¹²²,iii M. N. Agaras,¹²³

S. Atay,¹²³ A. Cakir,¹²³ K. Cankocak,¹²³ B. Grynyov,¹²⁴ L. Levchuk,¹²⁵ F. Ball,¹²⁶ L. Beck,¹²⁶ J. J. Brooke,¹²⁶ D. Burns,¹²⁶

E. Clement,¹²⁶ D. Cussans,¹²⁶ O. Davignon,¹²⁶ H. Flacher,¹²⁶ J. Goldstein,¹²⁶ G. P. Heath,¹²⁶ H. F. Heath,¹²⁶ J. Jacob,¹²⁶

L. Kreczko,¹²⁶ D. M. Newbold,¹²⁶,iii S. Paramesvaran,¹²⁶ T. Sakuma,¹²⁶ S. Seif El Nasr-storey,¹²⁶ D. Smith,¹²⁶ V. J. Smith,¹²⁶
K. W. Bell,¹²⁷ A. Belyaev,¹²⁷,kkk C. Brew,¹²⁷ R. M. Brown,¹²⁷ L. Calligaris,¹²⁷ D. Cieri,¹²⁷ D. J. A. Cockerill,¹²⁷

J. A. Coughlan,¹²⁷ K. Harder,¹²⁷ S. Harper,¹²⁷ E. Olaiya,¹²⁷ D. Petyt,¹²⁷ C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous,¹²⁷ A. Thea,¹²⁷
I. R. Tomalin,¹²⁷ T. Williams,¹²⁷ G. Auzinger,¹²⁸ R. Bainbridge,¹²⁸ J. Borg,¹²⁸ S. Breeze,¹²⁸ O. Buchmuller,¹²⁸

A. Bundock,¹²⁸ S. Casasso,¹²⁸ M. Citron,¹²⁸ D. Colling,¹²⁸ L. Corpe,¹²⁸ P. Dauncey,¹²⁸ G. Davies,¹²⁸ A. De Wit,¹²⁸

M. Della Negra,¹²⁸ R. Di Maria,¹²⁸ A. Elwood,¹²⁸ Y. Haddad,¹²⁸ G. Hall,¹²⁸ G. Iles,¹²⁸ T. James,¹²⁸ R. Lane,¹²⁸ C. Laner,¹²⁸
L. Lyons,¹²⁸ A.-M. Magnan,¹²⁸ S. Malik,¹²⁸ L. Mastrolorenzo,¹²⁸ T. Matsushita,¹²⁸ J. Nash,¹²⁸ A. Nikitenko,¹²⁸,h

V. Palladino,¹²⁸ M. Pesaresi,¹²⁸ D. M. Raymond,¹²⁸ A. Richards,¹²⁸ A. Rose,¹²⁸ E. Scott,¹²⁸ C. Seez,¹²⁸ A. Shtipliyski,¹²⁸

S. Summers,¹²⁸ A. Tapper,¹²⁸ K. Uchida,¹²⁸ M. Vazquez Acosta,¹²⁸,lll T. Virdee,¹²⁸,p N. Wardle,¹²⁸ D. Winterbottom,¹²⁸

J. Wright,¹²⁸ S. C. Zenz,¹²⁸ J. E. Cole,¹²⁹ P. R. Hobson,¹²⁹ A. Khan,¹²⁹ P. Kyberd,¹²⁹ I. D. Reid,¹²⁹ P. Symonds,¹²⁹

L. Teodorescu,¹²⁹ M. Turner,¹²⁹ S. Zahid,¹²⁹ A. Borzou,¹³⁰ K. Call,¹³⁰ J. Dittmann,¹³⁰ K. Hatakeyama,¹³⁰ H. Liu,¹³⁰

N. Pastika,¹³⁰ C. Smith,¹³⁰ R. Bartek,¹³¹ A. Dominguez,¹³¹ A. Buccilli,¹³² S. I. Cooper,¹³² C. Henderson,¹³² P. Rumerio,¹³²

C. West,¹³² D. Arcaro,¹³³ A. Avetisyan,¹³³ T. Bose,¹³³ D. Gastler,¹³³ D. Rankin,¹³³ C. Richardson,¹³³ J. Rohlf,¹³³ L. Sulak,¹³³
D. Zou,¹³³ G. Benelli,¹³⁴ D. Cutts,¹³⁴ A. Garabedian,¹³⁴ M. Hadley,¹³⁴ J. Hakala,¹³⁴ U. Heintz,¹³⁴ J. M. Hogan,¹³⁴

K. H. M. Kwok,¹³⁴ E. Laird,¹³⁴ G. Landsberg,¹³⁴ J. Lee,¹³⁴ Z. Mao,¹³⁴ M. Narain,¹³⁴ J. Pazzini,¹³⁴ S. Piperov,¹³⁴ S. Sagir,¹³⁴

R. Syarif,¹³⁴ D. Yu,¹³⁴ R. Band,¹³⁵ C. Brainerd,¹³⁵ D. Burns,¹³⁵ M. Calderon De La Barca Sanchez,¹³⁵ M. Chertok,¹³⁵

J. Conway,¹³⁵ R. Conway,¹³⁵ P. T. Cox,¹³⁵ R. Erbacher,¹³⁵ C. Flores,¹³⁵ G. Funk,¹³⁵ M. Gardner,¹³⁵ W. Ko,¹³⁵ R. Lander,¹³⁵

C. Mclean,¹³⁵ M. Mulhearn,¹³⁵ D. Pellett,¹³⁵ J. Pilot,¹³⁵ S. Shalhout,¹³⁵ M. Shi,¹³⁵ J. Smith,¹³⁵ D. Stolp,¹³⁵ K. Tos,¹³⁵

M. Tripathi,¹³⁵ Z. Wang,¹³⁵ M. Bachtis,¹³⁶ C. Bravo,¹³⁶ R. Cousins,¹³⁶ A. Dasgupta,¹³⁶ A. Florent,¹³⁶ J. Hauser,¹³⁶

M. Ignatenko,¹³⁶ N. Mccoll,¹³⁶ S. Regnard,¹³⁶ D. Saltzberg,¹³⁶ C. Schnaible,¹³⁶ V. Valuev,¹³⁶ E. Bouvier,¹³⁷ K. Burt,¹³⁷

R. Clare,¹³⁷ J. Ellison,¹³⁷ J. W. Gary,¹³⁷ S. M. A. Ghiasi Shirazi,¹³⁷ G. Hanson,¹³⁷ J. Heilman,¹³⁷ E. Kennedy,¹³⁷

F. Lacroix,¹³⁷ O. R. Long,¹³⁷ M. Olmedo Negrete,¹³⁷ M. I. Paneva,¹³⁷ W. Si,¹³⁷ L. Wang,¹³⁷ H. Wei,¹³⁷ S. Wimpenny,¹³⁷

B. R. Yates,¹³⁷ J. G. Branson,¹³⁸ S. Cittolin,¹³⁸ M. Derdzinski,¹³⁸ R. Gerosa,¹³⁸ D. Gilbert,¹³⁸ B. Hashemi,¹³⁸ A. Holzner,¹³⁸

D. Klein,¹³⁸ G. Kole,¹³⁸ V. Krutelyov,¹³⁸ J. Letts,¹³⁸ I. Macneill,¹³⁸ M. Masciovecchio,¹³⁸ D. Olivito,¹³⁸ S. Padhi,¹³⁸

M. Pieri,¹³⁸ M. Sani,¹³⁸ V. Sharma,¹³⁸ S. Simon,¹³⁸ M. Tadel,¹³⁸ A. Vartak,¹³⁸ S. Wasserbaech,¹³⁸, mmm J. Wood,¹³⁸

F. Würthwein,¹³⁸ A. Yagil,¹³⁸ G. Zevi Della Porta,¹³⁸ N. Amin,¹³⁹ R. Bhandari,¹³⁹ J. Bradmiller-Feld,¹³⁹ C. Campagnari,¹³⁹

A. Dishaw,¹³⁹ V. Dutta,¹³⁹ M. Franco Sevilla,¹³⁹ C. George,¹³⁹ F. Golf,¹³⁹ L. Gouskos,¹³⁹ J. Gran,¹³⁹ R. Heller,¹³⁹

J. Incandela,¹³⁹ S. D. Mullin,¹³⁹ A. Ovcharova,¹³⁹ H. Qu,¹³⁹ J. Richman,¹³⁹ D. Stuart,¹³⁹ I. Suarez,¹³⁹ J. Yoo,¹³⁹

D. Anderson,¹⁴⁰ J. Bendavid,¹⁴⁰ A. Bornheim,¹⁴⁰ J. M. Lawhorn,¹⁴⁰ H. B. Newman,¹⁴⁰ T. Nguyen,¹⁴⁰ C. Pena,¹⁴⁰

M. Spiropulu,¹⁴⁰ J. R. Vlimant,¹⁴⁰ S. Xie,¹⁴⁰ Z. Zhang,¹⁴⁰ R. Y. Zhu,¹⁴⁰ M. B. Andrews,¹⁴¹ T. Ferguson,¹⁴¹ T. Mudholkar,¹⁴¹

M. Paulini,¹⁴¹ J. Russ,¹⁴¹ M. Sun,¹⁴¹ H. Vogel,¹⁴¹ I. Vorobiev,¹⁴¹ M. Weinberg,¹⁴¹ J. P. Cumalat,¹⁴² W. T. Ford,¹⁴²

F. Jensen,¹⁴² A. Johnson,¹⁴² M. Krohn,¹⁴² S. Leontsinis,¹⁴² T. Mulholland,¹⁴² K. Stenson,¹⁴² S. R. Wagner,¹⁴²

J. Alexander,¹⁴³ J. Chaves,¹⁴³ J. Chu,¹⁴³ S. Dittmer,¹⁴³ K. Mcdermott,¹⁴³ N. Mirman,¹⁴³ J. R. Patterson,¹⁴³ D. Quach,¹⁴³

A. Rinkevicius,¹⁴³ A. Ryd,¹⁴³ L. Skinnari,¹⁴³ L. Soffi,¹⁴³ S. M. Tan,¹⁴³ Z. Tao,¹⁴³ J. Thom,¹⁴³ J. Tucker,¹⁴³ P. Wittich,¹⁴³

M. Zientek,¹⁴³ S. Abdullin,¹⁴⁴ M. Albrow,¹⁴⁴ M. Alyari,¹⁴⁴ G. Apollinari,¹⁴⁴ A. Apresyan,¹⁴⁴ A. Apyan,¹⁴⁴ S. Banerjee,¹⁴⁴

L. A. T. Bauerdick,¹⁴⁴ A. Beretvas,¹⁴⁴ J. Berryhill,¹⁴⁴ P. C. Bhat,¹⁴⁴ G. Bolla,¹⁴⁴, a K. Burkett,¹⁴⁴ J. N. Butler,¹⁴⁴ A. Canepa,¹⁴⁴

G. B. Cerati,¹⁴⁴ H. W. K. Cheung,¹⁴⁴ F. Chlebana,¹⁴⁴ M. Cremonesi,¹⁴⁴ J. Duarte,¹⁴⁴ V. D. Elvira,¹⁴⁴ J. Freeman,¹⁴⁴

Z. Gecse,¹⁴⁴ E. Gottschalk,¹⁴⁴ L. Gray,¹⁴⁴ D. Green,¹⁴⁴ S. Grünendahl,¹⁴⁴ O. Gutsche,¹⁴⁴ R. M. Harris,¹⁴⁴ S. Hasegawa,¹⁴⁴

J. Hirschauer,¹⁴⁴ Z. Hu,¹⁴⁴ B. Jayatilaka,¹⁴⁴ S. Jindariani,¹⁴⁴ M. Johnson,¹⁴⁴ U. Joshi,¹⁴⁴ B. Klima,¹⁴⁴ B. Kreis,¹⁴⁴

S. Lammel,¹⁴⁴ D. Lincoln,¹⁴⁴ R. Lipton,¹⁴⁴ M. Liu,¹⁴⁴ T. Liu,¹⁴⁴ R. Lopes De Sá,¹⁴⁴ J. Lykken,¹⁴⁴ K. Maeshima,¹⁴⁴

N. Magini,¹⁴⁴ J. M. Marraffino,¹⁴⁴ D. Mason,¹⁴⁴ P. McBride,¹⁴⁴ P. Merkel,¹⁴⁴ S. Mrenna,¹⁴⁴ S. Nahn,¹⁴⁴ V. O'Dell,¹⁴⁴

K. Pedro,¹⁴⁴ O. Prokofyev,¹⁴⁴ G. Rakness,¹⁴⁴ L. Ristori,¹⁴⁴ B. Schneider,¹⁴⁴ E. Sexton-Kennedy,¹⁴⁴ A. Soha,¹⁴⁴

W. J. Spalding,¹⁴⁴ L. Spiegel,¹⁴⁴ S. Stoynev,¹⁴⁴ J. Strait,¹⁴⁴ N. Strobbe,¹⁴⁴ L. Taylor,¹⁴⁴ S. Tkaczyk,¹⁴⁴ N. V. Tran,¹⁴⁴

L. Uplegger,¹⁴⁴ E. W. Vaandering,¹⁴⁴ C. Vernieri,¹⁴⁴ M. Verzocchi,¹⁴⁴ R. Vidal,¹⁴⁴ M. Wang,¹⁴⁴ H. A. Weber,¹⁴⁴

A. Whitbeck,¹⁴⁴ D. Acosta,¹⁴⁵ P. Avery,¹⁴⁵ P. Bortignon,¹⁴⁵ D. Bourilkov,¹⁴⁵ A. Brinkerhoff,¹⁴⁵ A. Carnes,¹⁴⁵ M. Carver,¹⁴⁵

D. Curry,¹⁴⁵ R. D. Field,¹⁴⁵ I. K. Furic,¹⁴⁵ S. V. Gleyzer,¹⁴⁵ B. M. Joshi,¹⁴⁵ J. Konigsberg,¹⁴⁵ A. Korytov,¹⁴⁵ K. Kotov,¹⁴⁵

P. Ma,¹⁴⁵ K. Matchev,¹⁴⁵ H. Mei,¹⁴⁵ G. Mitselmakher,¹⁴⁵ D. Rank,¹⁴⁵ K. Shi,¹⁴⁵ D. Sperka,¹⁴⁵ N. Terentyev,¹⁴⁵ L. Thomas,¹⁴⁵

J. Wang,¹⁴⁵ S. Wang,¹⁴⁵ J. Yelton,¹⁴⁵ Y. R. Joshi,¹⁴⁶ S. Linn,¹⁴⁶ P. Markowitz,¹⁴⁶ J. L. Rodriguez,¹⁴⁶ A. Ackert,¹⁴⁷

T. Adams,¹⁴⁷ A. Askew,¹⁴⁷ S. Hagopian,¹⁴⁷ V. Hagopian,¹⁴⁷ K. F. Johnson,¹⁴⁷ T. Kolberg,¹⁴⁷ G. Martinez,¹⁴⁷ T. Perry,¹⁴⁷

H. Prosper,¹⁴⁷ A. Saha,¹⁴⁷ A. Santra,¹⁴⁷ V. Sharma,¹⁴⁷ R. Yohay,¹⁴⁷ M. M. Baarmand,¹⁴⁸ V. Bhopatkar,¹⁴⁸

S. Colafranceschi,¹⁴⁸ M. Hohlmann,¹⁴⁸ D. Noonan,¹⁴⁸ T. Roy,¹⁴⁸ F. Yumiceva,¹⁴⁸ M. R. Adams,¹⁴⁹ L. Apanasevich,¹⁴⁹

D. Berry,¹⁴⁹ R. R. Betts,¹⁴⁹ R. Cavanaugh,¹⁴⁹ X. Chen,¹⁴⁹ O. Evdokimov,¹⁴⁹ C. E. Gerber,¹⁴⁹ D. A. Hangal,¹⁴⁹

D. J. Hofman,¹⁴⁹ K. Jung,¹⁴⁹ J. Kamin,¹⁴⁹ I. D. Sandoval Gonzalez,¹⁴⁹ M. B. Tonjes,¹⁴⁹ H. Trauger,¹⁴⁹ N. Varelas,¹⁴⁹

H. Wang,¹⁴⁹ Z. Wu,¹⁴⁹ J. Zhang,¹⁴⁹ B. Bilki,¹⁵⁰, nnn W. Clarida,¹⁵⁰ K. Dilsiz,¹⁵⁰, ooo S. Durgut,¹⁵⁰ R. P. Gandrajula,¹⁵⁰

M. Haytmyradov,¹⁵⁰ V. Khristenko,¹⁵⁰ J.-P. Merlo,¹⁵⁰ H. Mermerkaya,¹⁵⁰, ppp A. Mestvirishvili,¹⁵⁰ A. Moeller,¹⁵⁰

J. Nachtman,¹⁵⁰ H. Ogul,¹⁵⁰, qqq Y. Onel,¹⁵⁰ F. Ozok,¹⁵⁰, rrr A. Penzo,¹⁵⁰ C. Snyder,¹⁵⁰ E. Tiras,¹⁵⁰ J. Wetzel,¹⁵⁰ K. Yi,¹⁵⁰

B. Blumenfeld,¹⁵¹ A. Cocoros,¹⁵¹ N. Eminizer,¹⁵¹ D. Fehling,¹⁵¹ L. Feng,¹⁵¹ A. V. Gritsan,¹⁵¹ P. Maksimovic,¹⁵¹

C. Mantilla,¹⁵¹ J. Roskes,¹⁵¹ U. Sarica,¹⁵¹ M. Swartz,¹⁵¹ M. Xiao,¹⁵¹ C. You,¹⁵¹ A. Al-bataineh,¹⁵² P. Baringer,¹⁵² A. Bean,¹⁵²

S. Boren,¹⁵² J. Bowen,¹⁵² J. Castle,¹⁵² S. Khalil,¹⁵² A. Kropivnitskaya,¹⁵² D. Majumder,¹⁵² W. Mcbrayer,¹⁵² M. Murray,¹⁵²

C. Royon,¹⁵² S. Sanders,¹⁵² E. Schmitz,¹⁵² J. D. Tapia Takaki,¹⁵² Q. Wang,¹⁵² A. Ivanov,¹⁵³ K. Kaadze,¹⁵³ Y. Maravin,¹⁵³

A. Mohammadi,¹⁵³ L. K. Saini,¹⁵³ N. Skhirtladze,¹⁵³ S. Toda,¹⁵³ F. Rebassoo,¹⁵⁴ D. Wright,¹⁵⁴ C. Anelli,¹⁵⁵ A. Baden,¹⁵⁵

O. Baron,¹⁵⁵ A. Belloni,¹⁵⁵ B. Calvert,¹⁵⁵ S. C. Eno,¹⁵⁵ Y. Feng,¹⁵⁵ C. Ferraioli,¹⁵⁵ N. J. Hadley,¹⁵⁵ S. Jabeen,¹⁵⁵ G. Y. Jeng,¹⁵⁵
R. G. Kellogg,¹⁵⁵ J. Kunkle,¹⁵⁵ A. C. Mignerey,¹⁵⁵ F. Ricci-Tam,¹⁵⁵ Y. H. Shin,¹⁵⁵ A. Skuja,¹⁵⁵ S. C. Tonwar,¹⁵⁵

D. Abercrombie,¹⁵⁶ B. Allen,¹⁵⁶ V. Azzolini,¹⁵⁶ R. Barbieri,¹⁵⁶ A. Baty,¹⁵⁶ R. Bi,¹⁵⁶ S. Brandt,¹⁵⁶ W. Busza,¹⁵⁶ I. A. Cali,¹⁵⁶

M. D'Alfonso,¹⁵⁶ Z. Demiragli,¹⁵⁶ G. Gomez Ceballos,¹⁵⁶ M. Goncharov,¹⁵⁶ D. Hsu,¹⁵⁶ M. Hu,¹⁵⁶ Y. Iiyama,¹⁵⁶

G. M. Innocenti,¹⁵⁶ M. Klute,¹⁵⁶ D. Kovalskyi,¹⁵⁶ Y. S. Lai,¹⁵⁶ Y.-J. Lee,¹⁵⁶ A. Levin,¹⁵⁶ P. D. Luckey,¹⁵⁶ B. Maier,¹⁵⁶

A. C. Marini,¹⁵⁶ C. Mcginn,¹⁵⁶ C. Mironov,¹⁵⁶ S. Narayanan,¹⁵⁶ X. Niu,¹⁵⁶ C. Paus,¹⁵⁶ C. Roland,¹⁵⁶ G. Roland,¹⁵⁶

J. Salfeld-Nebgen,¹⁵⁶ G. S. F. Stephans,¹⁵⁶ K. Tatar,¹⁵⁶ D. Velicanu,¹⁵⁶ J. Wang,¹⁵⁶ T. W. Wang,¹⁵⁶ B. Wyslouch,¹⁵⁶

A. C. Benvenuti,¹⁵⁷ R. M. Chatterjee,¹⁵⁷ A. Evans,¹⁵⁷ P. Hansen,¹⁵⁷ J. Hiltbrand,¹⁵⁷ S. Kalafut,¹⁵⁷ Y. Kubota,¹⁵⁷ Z. Lesko,¹⁵⁷

J. Mans,¹⁵⁷ S. Nourbakhsh,¹⁵⁷ N. Ruckstuhl,¹⁵⁷ R. Rusack,¹⁵⁷ J. Turkewitz,¹⁵⁷ M. A. Wadud,¹⁵⁷ J. G. Acosta,¹⁵⁸

S. Oliveros,¹⁵⁸ E. Avdeeva,¹⁵⁹ K. Bloom,¹⁵⁹ D. R. Claes,¹⁵⁹ C. Fangmeier,¹⁵⁹ R. Gonzalez Suarez,¹⁵⁹ R. Kamalieddin,¹⁵⁹

I. Kravchenko,¹⁵⁹ J. Monroy,¹⁵⁹ J. E. Siado,¹⁵⁹ G. R. Snow,¹⁵⁹ B. Stieger,¹⁵⁹ J. Dolen,¹⁶⁰ A. Godshalk,¹⁶⁰ C. Harrington,¹⁶⁰

I. Iashvili,¹⁶⁰ D. Nguyen,¹⁶⁰ A. Parker,¹⁶⁰ S. Rappoccio,¹⁶⁰ B. Roozbahani,¹⁶⁰ G. Alverson,¹⁶¹ E. Barberis,¹⁶¹

A. Hortiangtham,¹⁶¹ A. Massironi,¹⁶¹ D. M. Morse,¹⁶¹ T. Orimoto,¹⁶¹ R. Teixeira De Lima,¹⁶¹ D. Trocino,¹⁶¹ D. Wood,¹⁶¹

S. Bhattacharya,¹⁶² O. Charaf,¹⁶² K. A. Hahn,¹⁶² N. Mucia,¹⁶² N. Odell,¹⁶² B. Pollack,¹⁶² M. H. Schmitt,¹⁶² K. Sung,¹⁶²

M. Trovato,¹⁶² M. Velasco,¹⁶² N. Dev,¹⁶³ M. Hildreth,¹⁶³ K. Hurtado Anampa,¹⁶³ C. Jessop,¹⁶³ D. J. Karmgard,¹⁶³

N. Kellams,¹⁶³ K. Lannon,¹⁶³ N. Loukas,¹⁶³ N. Marinelli,¹⁶³ F. Meng,¹⁶³ C. Mueller,¹⁶³ Y. Musienko,¹⁶³,¹¹ M. Planer,¹⁶³

A. Reinsvold,¹⁶³ R. Ruchti,¹⁶³ G. Smith,¹⁶³ S. Taroni,¹⁶³ M. Wayne,¹⁶³ M. Wolf,¹⁶³ A. Woodard,¹⁶³ J. Alimena,¹⁶⁴

L. Antonelli,¹⁶⁴ B. Bylsma,¹⁶⁴ L. S. Durkin,¹⁶⁴ S. Flowers,¹⁶⁴ B. Francis,¹⁶⁴ A. Hart,¹⁶⁴ C. Hill,¹⁶⁴ W. Ji,¹⁶⁴ B. Liu,¹⁶⁴

W. Luo,¹⁶⁴ D. Puigh,¹⁶⁴ B. L. Winer,¹⁶⁴ H. W. Wulsin,¹⁶⁴ S. Cooperstein,¹⁶⁵ O. Driga,¹⁶⁵ P. Elmer,¹⁶⁵ J. Hardenbrook,¹⁶⁵

P. Hebda,¹⁶⁵ S. Higginbotham,¹⁶⁵ D. Lange,¹⁶⁵ J. Luo,¹⁶⁵ D. Marlow,¹⁶⁵ K. Mei,¹⁶⁵ I. Ojalvo,¹⁶⁵ J. Olsen,¹⁶⁵ C. Palmer,¹⁶⁵

P. Piroué,¹⁶⁵ D. Stickland,¹⁶⁵ C. Tully,¹⁶⁵ S. Malik,¹⁶⁶ S. Norberg,¹⁶⁶ A. Barker,¹⁶⁷ V. E. Barnes,¹⁶⁷ S. Das,¹⁶⁷ S. Folgueras,¹⁶⁷

L. Gutay,¹⁶⁷ M. K. Jha,¹⁶⁷ M. Jones,¹⁶⁷ A. W. Jung,¹⁶⁷ A. Khatiwada,¹⁶⁷ D. H. Miller,¹⁶⁷ N. Neumeister,¹⁶⁷ C. C. Peng,¹⁶⁷

H. Qiu,¹⁶⁷ J. F. Schulte,¹⁶⁷ J. Sun,¹⁶⁷ F. Wang,¹⁶⁷ W. Xie,¹⁶⁷ T. Cheng,¹⁶⁸ N. Parashar,¹⁶⁸ J. Stupak,¹⁶⁸ A. Adair,¹⁶⁹ Z. Chen,¹⁶⁹

K. M. Ecklund,¹⁶⁹ S. Freed,¹⁶⁹ F. J. M. Geurts,¹⁶⁹ M. Guilbaud,¹⁶⁹ M. Kilpatrick,¹⁶⁹ W. Li,¹⁶⁹ B. Michlin,¹⁶⁹ M. Northup,¹⁶⁹

B. P. Padley,¹⁶⁹ J. Roberts,¹⁶⁹ J. Rorie,¹⁶⁹ W. Shi,¹⁶⁹ Z. Tu,¹⁶⁹ J. Zabel,¹⁶⁹ A. Zhang,¹⁶⁹ A. Bodek,¹⁷⁰ P. de Barbaro,¹⁷⁰

R. Demina,¹⁷⁰ Y. t. Duh,¹⁷⁰ T. Ferbel,¹⁷⁰ M. Galanti,¹⁷⁰ A. Garcia-Bellido,¹⁷⁰ J. Han,¹⁷⁰ O. Hindrichs,¹⁷⁰

A. Khukhunaishvili,¹⁷⁰ K. H. Lo,¹⁷⁰ P. Tan,¹⁷⁰ M. Verzetti,¹⁷⁰ R. Ciesielski,¹⁷¹ K. Goulianos,¹⁷¹ C. Mesropian,¹⁷¹

A. Agapitos,¹⁷² J. P. Chou,¹⁷² Y. Gershtein,¹⁷² T. A. Gómez Espinosa,¹⁷² E. Halkiadakis,¹⁷² M. Heindl,¹⁷² E. Hughes,¹⁷²

S. Kaplan,¹⁷² R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli,¹⁷² S. Kyriacou,¹⁷² A. Lath,¹⁷² R. Montalvo,¹⁷² K. Nash,¹⁷² M. Osherson,¹⁷²

H. Saka,¹⁷² S. Salur,¹⁷² S. Schnetzer,¹⁷² D. Sheffield,¹⁷² S. Somalwar,¹⁷² R. Stone,¹⁷² S. Thomas,¹⁷² P. Thomassen,¹⁷²

M. Walker,¹⁷² A. G. Delannoy,¹⁷³ M. Foerster,¹⁷³ J. Heideman,¹⁷³ G. Riley,¹⁷³ K. Rose,¹⁷³ S. Spanier,¹⁷³ K. Thapa,¹⁷³

O. Bouhali,¹⁷⁴, sss A. Castaneda Hernandez,¹⁷⁴, sss A. Celik,¹⁷⁴ M. Dalchenko,¹⁷⁴ M. De Mattia,¹⁷⁴ A. Delgado,¹⁷⁴

S. Dildick,¹⁷⁴ R. Eusebi,¹⁷⁴ J. Gilmore,¹⁷⁴ T. Huang,¹⁷⁴ T. Kamon,¹⁷⁴, ttt R. Mueller,¹⁷⁴ Y. Pakhotin,¹⁷⁴ R. Patel,¹⁷⁴

A. Perloff,¹⁷⁴ L. Perniè,¹⁷⁴ D. Rathjens,¹⁷⁴ A. Safonov,¹⁷⁴ A. Tatarinov,¹⁷⁴ K. A. Ulmer,¹⁷⁴ N. Akchurin,¹⁷⁵ J. Damgov,¹⁷⁵

F. De Guio,¹⁷⁵ P. R. Dudero,¹⁷⁵ J. Faulkner,¹⁷⁵ E. Gurpinar,¹⁷⁵ S. Kunori,¹⁷⁵ K. Lamichhane,¹⁷⁵ S. W. Lee,¹⁷⁵ T. Libeiro,¹⁷⁵

T. Peltola,¹⁷⁵ S. Undleeb,¹⁷⁵ I. Volobouev,¹⁷⁵ Z. Wang,¹⁷⁵ S. Greene,¹⁷⁶ A. Gurrola,¹⁷⁶ R. Janjam,¹⁷⁶ W. Johns,¹⁷⁶

C. Maguire,¹⁷⁶ A. Melo,¹⁷⁶ H. Ni,¹⁷⁶ K. Padeken,¹⁷⁶ P. Sheldon,¹⁷⁶ S. Tuo,¹⁷⁶ J. Velkovska,¹⁷⁶ Q. Xu,¹⁷⁶ M. W. Arenton,¹⁷⁷

P. Barria,¹⁷⁷ B. Cox,¹⁷⁷ R. Hirosky,¹⁷⁷ M. Joyce,¹⁷⁷ A. Ledovskoy,¹⁷⁷ H. Li,¹⁷⁷ C. Neu,¹⁷⁷ T. Sinthuprasith,¹⁷⁷ Y. Wang,¹⁷⁷

E. Wolfe,¹⁷⁷ F. Xia,¹⁷⁷ R. Harr,¹⁷⁸ P. E. Karchin,¹⁷⁸ N. Poudyal,¹⁷⁸ J. Sturdy,¹⁷⁸ P. Thapa,¹⁷⁸ S. Zaleski,¹⁷⁸ M. Brodski,¹⁷⁹

J. Buchanan,¹⁷⁹ C. Caillol,¹⁷⁹ S. Dasu,¹⁷⁹ L. Dodd,¹⁷⁹ S. Duric,¹⁷⁹ B. Gomber,¹⁷⁹ M. Grothe,¹⁷⁹ M. Herndon,¹⁷⁹ A. Hervé,¹⁷⁹

U. Hussain,¹⁷⁹ P. Klabbers,¹⁷⁹ A. Lanaro,¹⁷⁹ A. Levine,¹⁷⁹ K. Long,¹⁷⁹ R. Loveless,¹⁷⁹ G. Polese,¹⁷⁹ T. Ruggles,¹⁷⁹

A. Savin,¹⁷⁹ N. Smith,¹⁷⁹ W. H. Smith,¹⁷⁹ D. Taylor,¹⁷⁹ and N. Woods¹⁷⁹

(CMS Collaboration)

<footnote n="1">¹Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Institut für Hochenergiephysik, Wien, Austria</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, Belarus</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium</footnote>
⁶Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

⁷Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

⁸Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

⁹Université de Mons, Mons, Belgium

¹⁰Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

¹¹Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

¹²ªUniversidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil

¹²ᵇUniversidade Federal do ABC, São Paulo, Brazil

¹³Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy of Bulgaria Academy of Sciences

¹⁴University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria

¹⁵Beihang University, Beijing, China

¹⁶Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China

¹⁷State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China

¹⁸Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia

¹⁹University of Split, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Split, Croatia

²⁰University of Split, Faculty of Science, Split, Croatia

²¹Institute Rudjer Boskovic, Zagreb, Croatia

²²University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

²³Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

²⁴Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador

²⁵Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt,
Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics, Cairo, Egypt

²⁶National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Tallinn, Estonia

²⁷Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

²⁸Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki, Finland

²⁹Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

³⁰IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

³¹Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Ecole polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France

³²Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR, Strasbourg, France

³³Centre de Calcul de l'Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules, CNRS/IN2P3, Villeurbanne, France

³⁴Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS-IN2P3, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

³⁵Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia

³⁶Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

³⁷RWTH Aachen University, I. Physikalisches Institut, Aachen, Germany

³⁸RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany

³⁹RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut B, Aachen, Germany

⁴⁰Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany

⁴¹University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

⁴²Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany

⁴³Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics (INPP), NCSR Demokritos, Aghia Paraskevi, Greece

⁴⁴National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

⁴⁵National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

⁴⁶University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

⁴⁷MTA-ELTE Lendület CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

⁴⁸Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary

⁴⁹Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary

⁵⁰Institute of Physics, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

⁵¹Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, India

⁵²National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar, India

⁵³Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

⁵⁴University of Delhi, Delhi, India

⁵⁵Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, HBNI, Kolkata, India

⁵⁶Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Madras, India

⁵⁷Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

⁵⁸Tata Institute of Fundamental Research-A, Mumbai, India

⁵⁹Tata Institute of Fundamental Research-B, Mumbai, India

⁶⁰Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, India

⁶¹Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran

⁶²University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

⁶³INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
63b Università di Bari, Bari, Italy

63c Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

64a INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

64b Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

65a INFN Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy

65b Università di Catania, Catania, Italy

66a INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

66b Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

67 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy

68a INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy

68b Università di Genova, Genova, Italy

69a INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

69b Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

70a INFN Sezione di Napoli, Roma, Italy

70b Università di Napoli 'Federico II', Roma, Italy

70c Università della Basilicata, Roma, Italy

70d Università G. Marconi, Roma, Italy

71a INFN Sezione di Padova, Trento, Italy

71b Università di Padova, Trento, Italy

71c Università di Trento, Trento, Italy

72a INFN Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy

72b Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy

73a INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy

73b Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy

74a INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

74b Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

74c Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

75a INFN Sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy

75b Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

76a INFN Sezione di Torino, Novara, Italy

76b Università di Torino, Novara, Italy

76c Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy

77a INFN Sezione di Trieste, Trieste, Italy

77b Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy

78 Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

79 Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea

80 Chonnam National University, Institute for Universe and Elementary Particles, Kwangju, Korea

81 Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea

82 Korea University, Seoul, Korea

83 Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

84 University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea

85 Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea

86 Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

87 National Centre for Particle Physics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

88 Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mexico City, Mexico

89 Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico

90 Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

91 Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

92 University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

93 University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

94 National Centre for Physics, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

95 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Swierk, Poland

96 Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

97 Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Lisboa, Portugal

98 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia

99 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina (St. Petersburg), Russia

100 Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia

101 Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia

102 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia

103 National Research Nuclear University 'Moscow Engineering Physics Institute' (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia
¹⁰⁴P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia

¹⁰⁵Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

¹⁰⁶Novosibirsk State University (NSU), Novosibirsk, Russia

¹⁰⁷State Research Center of Russian Federation, Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia

¹⁰⁸University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics and Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia

¹⁰⁹Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain

¹¹⁰Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

¹¹¹Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

¹¹²Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA), CSIC-Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain

¹¹³CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland

¹¹⁴Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland

¹¹⁵Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics (IPA), Zurich, Switzerland

¹¹⁶Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

¹¹⁷National Central University, Chung-Li, Taiwan

¹¹⁸National Taiwan University (NTU), Taipei, Taiwan

¹¹⁹Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Bangkok, Thailand

¹²⁰Çukurova University, Physics Department, Science and Art Faculty, Adana, Turkey

¹²¹Middle East Technical University, Physics Department, Ankara, Turkey

¹²²Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

¹²³Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

¹²⁴Institute for Scintillation Materials of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine

¹²⁵National Scientific Center, Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov, Ukraine

¹²⁶University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

¹²⁷Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom

¹²⁸Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

¹²⁹Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

¹³⁰Baylor University, Waco, USA

¹³¹Catholic University of America, Washington DC, USA

¹³²The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA

¹³³Boston University, Boston, USA

¹³⁴Brown University, Providence, USA

¹³⁵University of California, Davis, USA

¹³⁶University of California, Los Angeles, USA

¹³⁷University of California, Riverside, USA

¹³⁸University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA

¹³⁹University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Physics, Santa Barbara, USA

¹⁴⁰California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA

¹⁴¹Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA

¹⁴²University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA

¹⁴³Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

¹⁴⁴Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, USA

¹⁴⁵University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

¹⁴⁶Florida International University, Miami, USA

¹⁴⁷Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

¹⁴⁸Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, USA

¹⁴⁹University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Chicago, USA

¹⁵⁰The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

¹⁵¹Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

¹⁵²The University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA

¹⁵³Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA

¹⁵⁴Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

¹⁵⁵University of Maryland, College Park, USA

¹⁵⁶Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA

¹⁵⁷University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

¹⁵⁸University of Mississippi, Oxford, USA

¹⁵⁹University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USA

¹⁶⁰State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA

¹⁶¹Northeastern University, Boston, USA

¹⁶²Northwestern University, Evanston, USA

¹⁶³University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA
¹⁶⁴The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

¹⁶⁵Princeton University, Princeton, USA

¹⁶⁶University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, USA

¹⁶⁷Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

¹⁶⁸Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, USA

¹⁶⁹Rice University, Houston, USA

¹⁷⁰University of Rochester, Rochester, USA

¹⁷¹The Rockefeller University, New York, USA

¹⁷²Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, USA

¹⁷³University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA

¹⁷⁴Texas A&M University, College Station, USA

¹⁷⁵Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA

¹⁷⁶Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA

¹⁷⁷University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA

¹⁷⁸Wayne State University, Detroit, USA

¹⁷⁹University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI, USA

ᵃDeceased.

ᵇAlso at Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

ᶜAlso at State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

ᵈAlso at IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

ᵉAlso at Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

>fAlso at Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

gAlso at Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.

hAlso at Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, Russia.

¹Also at Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia.

jAlso at Suez University, Suez, Egypt.

kAlso at British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.

¹Also at Fayoum University, El-Fayoum, Egypt.

mAlso at Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.

nAlso at Université de Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, France.

oAlso at Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

pAlso at CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland.

qAlso at RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany.

rAlso at University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

sAlso at Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany.

¹Also at MTA-ELTE Lendület CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

tAlso at Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary.

vAlso at Institute of Physics, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

wAlso at IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.

xAlso at Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar, India.

yAlso at University of Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, India.

zAlso at University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.

aaAlso at Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.

bbAlso at Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

ccAlso at Plasma Physics Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

ddAlso at Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy

eeAlso at INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.

ffAlso at Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro dell'INFN, Legnaro, Italy.

ggAlso at Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

hhAlso at International Islamic University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

iiAlso at Malaysian Nuclear Agency, MOSTI, Kajang, Malaysia.

jjAlso at Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico City, Mexico.

kkAlso at Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw, Poland.

llAlso at Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia.

mmAlso at National Research Nuclear University 'Moscow Engineering Physics Institute' (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.

nnAlso at St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.

ooAlso at University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

ppAlso at P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia.

qqAlso at California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.
rr Also at Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.

ss Also at Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

tt Also at University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics and Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia.

uu Also at Scuola Normale e Sezione dell'INFN, Pisa, Italy.

vv Also at National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

ww Also at Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia.

xx Also at Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

yy Also at Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physics.

zz Also at Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey.

aaa Also at Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

bbb Also at Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

ccc Also at Cag University, Mersin, Turkey.

ddd Also at Piri Reis University, Istanbul, Turkey.

eee Also at Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey.

fff Also at Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

ggg Also at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

hhh Also at Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.

iii Also at Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey.

jjj Also at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom.

kkk Also at School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

lll Also at Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain.

mmmm Also at Utah Valley University, Orem, USA.

nnn Also at Beykent University.

ooo Also at Bingol University, Bingol, Turkey.

ppp Also at Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey.

qqq Also at Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey.

rrr Also at Mimar Sinan University, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

sss Also at Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

ttt Also at Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.