# Editorial for the Special Issue “Microbial Nonribosomal Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites”

Stéphane Cociancich, Valérie Leclère

► To cite this version:

Stéphane Cociancich, Valérie Leclère. Editorial for the Special Issue “Microbial Nonribosomal Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites”. Microorganisms, 2022, 10 (5), pp.1064. 10.3390/microorganisms10051064. [https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051064](https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051064)

HAL Id: hal-03792327

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03792327

Submitted on 30 Sep 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Editorial

# Editorial for the Special Issue “Microbial Nonribosomal Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites”

Stéphane Cociancich <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,* and Valérie Leclère <fnref n="3" /> ID

Microbial secondary metabolites are natural products that display various therapeutic or agrochemical relevant activities (e.g., antibiotics, antifungal, or antiproliferative agents, siderophores, or toxins). The identification of new secondary metabolites is of major interest, as their activities give them a prime placement in the “One-Health” worldwide concept triad that connects healthy people, healthy animals, and healthy environments. Bacteria and fungi produce many of these compounds as a courtesy of nonribosomal biosynthetic enzymatic pathways, which involve multimodular megaenzymes named nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs). This Special Issue includes a review highlighting recent progress in understanding the complexity of the mechanisms of nonribosomal synthesis [1], and five research articles describing the successful discovery of new nonribosomal peptides [2–5], their structural characterization [3,5], and their relationship with the taxonomic position of the producing strains [6].

NRPSs exhibit a fascinating thiotemplate-based characteristic architecture that permits the specific assembly of proteinogenic or nonproteinogenic monomers (e.g., amino acids, hydroxyacids, acyl-thioesters, fatty acids, chromophores). NRPSs are organized into modules, each of which is responsible for the specific incorporation of a given monomer into the growing peptidic chain. The mechanism leading to the assembly of the monomers to build up the peptide generally follows canonical rules using the core enzymatic domains referred to as A (adenylation) domain, T (thiolation) domain, C (condensation) domain, and a TE (thioesterase) domain ending the assembly line. However, the constantly expanding literature presents many examples of NRPSs exhibiting very rare domains and/or noncanonical organizations of domains and modules, thus revealing amazing strategies developed by microorganisms to synthesize nonribosomal peptides [1].

Genes encoding these huge synthetases are often clustered with other gene-encoding enzymes required for the synthesis of rare monomers, regulation, immunity, transport, or for tailoring (among others) proteins, leading to the concept of biosynthetic genes clusters (BGCs) being responsible for the biosynthesis, structural modifications, regulation, and transport of the corresponding secondary metabolites. For decades, new secondary metabolites were discovered through screenings of biological activities, but recently, increasing rediscoveries of already-known compounds proved that this strategy has become less efficient. However, the current exponential increase in available genomic sequences (including sequences from thousands of complete microbial genomes) suddenly gives access to a considerable amount of information which unravels the potential of microorganisms to produce secondary metabolites exhibiting new structural scaffolds, and therefore, new biological activities. This paved the way for another strategy to seek new metabolites based on in silico analyses of microbial genomes. This strategy is also known as genome mining. For the identification of new nonribosomal peptides, genomes can be mined for either BGCs containing genes encoding NRPSs with modular organization (including specific enzymatic

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Cociancich, S.; Leclère, V. Editorial for the Special Issue "Microbial Nonribosomal Synthesis of Secondary Metabolites".

*Microorganisms* **2022**, *10*, 1064.

https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051064

Received: 29 April 2022

Accepted: 20 May 2022

Published: 21 May 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

<footnote n="1">¹ CIRAD, UMR PHIM, F-34398 Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² PHIM, Université Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, F-34398 Montpellier, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Université de Lille, Université de Liège, UMRT 1158 BioEcoAgro, Métabolites Secondaires d'Origine Microbienne, Institut Charles Viollette, F-59000 Lille, France; valerie.leclere@univ-lille.fr</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: stephane.cociancich@cirad.fr</footnote>
domains), or genes encoding enzymes involved in biosynthesis of rare monomers. A major
advantage of following a genome mining strategy rather than bioassay-based screenings is
the detection of poorly expressed or unexpressed BGCs. Indeed, the mining over hundreds
of genomes together with wet lab production assays reveals that most of the BGCs may
remain silent under usual laboratory culture conditions. The actual challenge is to exploit
this metabolic potential using techniques to awaken these silent/cryptic BGCs or using
production in heterologous hosts. With these approaches, the metabolic potential appears
vastly superior to previous estimates based on compounds isolated only on the basis of
their biological activity.

In silico analyses of microbial genomes have benefited from recent efforts to develop
bioinformatic tools for automatized detection of BGCs, determination of NRPS organization
in modules and domains, and prediction of monomers incorporated by the various A
domains. This resulted in the design of the chemical structures of the metabolites expected
to be produced. These bioinformatic tools include online software such as antiSMASH
(http://antismash الثاني metabolites.org) or NapDOS (https://npdomainseeker.sdsc.
edu/) as well as NRPS databases such as Mibig (https://mibig secondarymetabolites.org)
or Norine, the unique resource on nonribosomal peptides (http://norine.univ-lille.fr/
norine/). Nevertheless, these bioinformatic resources are currently unable to handle NRPS
pathways diverging from the canonical rules.

Aiming at presenting current and future directions in understanding the nonribosomal
biosynthesis of microbial secondary metabolites, this Special Issue includes five research
articles and one review which all show that the discovery and characterization of new
nonribosomal secondary metabolites must consider numerous BGCs organizations and
biosynthetic pathways beyond the canonical rules described above.

In their review, Duban et al. [1] discuss examples of secondary metabolites biosynthe-
sized through pathways diverging from the canonical colinear mode, and hence involving
NRPSs displaying either very rare domains and/or a noncanonical organization of modules
and domains. This long (although probably inexhaustive) list of examples tells us that it is
necessary to enlarge our vision of the nonribosomal peptide synthesis. Indeed, the more we
learn about these biosynthesis pathways, the easier it will be to identify new natural prod-
ucts, especially through genome mining. Nevertheless, this very popular in silico strategy
used for the discovery of potential new products of interest is pointless if not supported by
the actual production, isolation, structural characterization, and determination of the mode
of action of the corresponding natural products.

Although nonribosomal peptide synthesis is widespread within the bacterial and
fungal kingdoms, all five research articles from this Special Issue provide examples of
secondary metabolites produced by strains belonging to *Streptomyces* spp. *Streptomyces*
are the source of thousands of previously described secondary metabolites and, as such,
are often designed as metabolic factories. This shows that a genome mining approach
may lead to the discovery of new metabolites from a genus, which is a reservoir for a very
large number of compounds of interest. Interestingly, four out the five research articles
describe nonribosomal peptide synthesis mechanisms that mainly work out of the canonical
rules. The in silico analysis of nonribosomal BGCs, together with heterologous expression,
represents a successful strategy that resulted in the discovery of BE-18257 antibiotics and
pentaminomycins [2], cyclic depsibosamycins [3], and bonsecamin [4].

A surprising BGC organization is highlighted in the work of Roman-Hurtado et al. [2],
which reports the presence of two NRPS-encoding genes within the same BGC. These genes
are involved in the biosynthesis of two unrelated secondary metabolites (pentaminomycins
and BE-18257 peptides) that are both cyclic pentapeptides but with very different structures.
Interestingly, most of the enzymes encoded by the other genes within the BGC are shared
during the biosynthesis of the respective products. Moreover, no TE domain was found in
any of the NRPSs present within the BGC. Consequently, the release and macrocyclization
of pentaminomycins and BE-18257 peptides is most likely performed by a stand-alone
penicillin binding domain-type TE.
In their article, Stierhof et al. [3] deciphered the biosynthesis of depsibosamycins, which are cyclic octapeptides differing from their already-known linear counterparts (bosamycins) due to a four-amino acid ring formed by a side-chain-to-tail lactonization of serine and glycine. The NRPSs encoded by the BGC of depsibosamycins do possess a rather canonical organization, with the remarkable exception of a stand-alone NRPS module missing the C domain but possessing a CytP450 domain, allowing the incorporation of a subsequently methylated 5-OH-Tyr moiety.

Lasch et al. [4] describe the biosynthesis of the cyclic pentapeptides named bonsecamins. Bonsecamins are produced in a linear form and undergo further intramolecular dehydrative cyclization through the action of the products of two out of the seven genes forming the BGC. Bonsecamins NRPSs are formed by only three modules (one of them organized in a noncanonical way), which do not fit with the colinear canonical organization of NRPSs synthesizing pentapeptides. Remarkably, one of these modules incorporates a tripeptide produced by a NRPS-independent mechanism involving a putative alanine ligase. Such organization renders it difficult to make any prediction solely based on bioinformatic tools.

Another method of genome mining is to search for genes encoding rare amino acid biosynthesis enzymes and not to search directly for BGCs containing NRPS. Following this strategy, Horbal et al. [5] unraveled the biosynthetic pathway for the cyclohexapeptide cyclofaulknamycin that contains the rare D-capreomycidine monomer. The biosynthesis of this rare amino acid is partially performed by genes within the BGC, but it also requires the action of a pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent aminotransferase encoded by a gene located elsewhere in the genome. Interestingly, the NRPSs involved in cyclofaulknamycin biosynthesis do not contain any TE domain. Although a stand-alone type-II TE domain is present within the BGC, it is predicted to have a proofreading activity, whereas the release and cyclization of the cyclic hexapeptide would rather rely on an α/β hydrolase encoded within the BGC.

Finally, the fifth research article from this Special Issue is authored by Komaki et al. [6], who performed genome mining within *Streptomyces hygroscopicus* strains. More precisely, these authors analyzed the conserved BGC for nyuzenamide, a bicyclic peptide exhibiting antifungal and cytotoxic activities, in silico. Hence, they confirmed the correlation between taxonomic classifications of *S. hygroscopicus* strains obtained by 16S rDNA comparisons and by in silico analysis of nyuzenamide BGCs. As a result, strains of *S. hygroscopicus* were reclassified into two subspecies named *S. sporocinereus* and *S. hygroscopicus* subsp. *hygroscopicus*, respectively.

In conclusion, the original articles and review published in this Special Issue are interesting illustrations of the importance of improving and increasing our knowledge of nonribosomal peptide synthesis. This is reinforced by nonribosomal pathways' complexity in comparison to canonical pathways, which are already complicated in their own right. Each new peptide discovered through bioactivity screening or genome mining is of considerable importance to feed data regarding diversity of biosynthetic pathways and to improve the accuracy of bioinformatics tools.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

**References**

1. Duban, M.; Cociancich, S.; Leclère, V. Nonribosomal peptide synthesis definitely working out of the rules. *Microorganisms* **2022**, *10*, 577. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Roman-Hurtado, F.; Sanchez-Hidalgo, M.; Martin, J.; Ortiz-Lopez, F.J.; Carretero-Molina, D.; Reyes, F.; Genilloud, O. One pathway, two cyclic non-ribosomal pentapeptides: Heterologous expression of BE-18257 antibiotics and pentaminomycins from *Streptomyces cacaoi* CA-170360. *Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Stierhof, M.; Myronovskyi Zapp, J.; Luzhetskyy, A. Discovery and heterologous production of new cyclic depsibosamycins. *Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 1396. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Lasch, C.; Stierhof, M.; Estevez, M.R.; Myronovskyi, M.; Zapp, J.; Luzhetskyy, A. Bonsecamin: A new cyclic pentapeptide discovered through heterologous expression of a cryptic gene cluster. *Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 1640. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5. Horbal, L.; Stierhof, M.; Palusczuk, A.; Eckert, N.; Zapp, J.; Luzhetskyy, A. Cyclofaulknamycin with the rare amino acid D-capreomycidine isolated from a well-characterized *Streptomyces albus* strain. *Microorganisms* **2021**, *9*, 1609. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Komaki, H.; Igarashi, Y.; Tamura, T. Taxonomic positions of nyuzenamide-producer and its closely related strains. *Microorganisms* **2022**, *10*, 349. [CrossRef] [PubMed]