# Thickness Effect on the Solid-State Reaction of a Ni/GaAs System

Selma Rabhi, Nouredine Oueldna, Carine Perrin-Pellegrino, Alain Portavoce, Karol Kalna, Mohamed Cherif Benoudia, Khalid Hoummada

► To cite this version:

Selma Rabhi, Nouredine Oueldna, Carine Perrin-Pellegrino, Alain Portavoce, Karol Kalna, et al. Thickness Effect on the Solid-State Reaction of a Ni/GaAs System. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12, 10.3390/nano12152633. [DOI: 10.3390/nano12152633](https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152633)

HAL Id: hal-03841787

https://hal.science/hal-03841787

Submitted on 7 Nov 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Thickness Effect on the Solid-State Reaction of a Ni/GaAs System

Selma Rabhi <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />, Nouredine Oueldna <fnref n="1" />,* ID, Carine Perrin-Pellegrino <fnref n="1" />, Alain Portavoce <fnref n="1" />, Karol Kalna <fnref n="3" /> ID, Mohamed Cherif Benoudia <fnref n="2" /> ID and Khalid Hoummada <fnref n="1" />

**Abstract:** Ni thin films with different thicknesses were grown on a GaAs substrate using the magnetron sputtering technique followed by in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) annealing in order to study the solid-state reaction between Ni and GaAs substrate. The thickness dependence on the formation of the intermetallic phases was investigated using in situ and ex situ XRD, pole figures, and atom probe tomography (APT). The results indicate that the 20 nm-thick Ni film exhibits an epitaxial relation with the GaAs substrate, which is (001) Ni//-(001) GaAs and [111] Ni//-[110] GaAs after deposition. Increasing the film's thickness results in a change of the Ni film's texture. This difference has an impact on the formation temperature of Ni₃GaAs. This temperature decreases simultaneously with the thickness increase. This is due to the coherent/incoherent nature of the initial Ni/GaAs interface. The Ni₃GaAs phase decomposes into the binary and ternary compounds xNiAs and Ni₃-xGaAs₁-x at about 400 °C. Similarly to Ni₃GaAs, the decomposition temperature of the second phase also depends on the initial thickness of the Ni layer.

**Keywords:** solid-state reaction; thickness; Ni-thin films; III-VI semi-conductors; in situ X-ray diffraction; intermetallic growth

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Rabhi, S.; Oueldna, N.; Perrin-Pellegrino, C.; Portavoce, A.; Kalna, K.; Benoudia, M.C.; Hoummada, K. Thickness Effect on the Solid-State Reaction of a Ni/GaAs System. *Nanomaterials* **2022**, *12*, 2633. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152633

Academic Editor: Béla Pécz

Received: 14 June 2022

Accepted: 28 July 2022

Published: 30 July 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## 1. Introduction

With the exponential development of photonics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and microelectronics, the attention of researchers has turned to new materials that are more efficient than silicon, such as III-V semiconductors [1–7]. III-V semiconductors have promising physical and electrical properties such as direct band gap and high charge carrier mobility [8–11]. Their on-chip integration with a Si technology delivers enhanced functionality and performance while reducing the manufacturing costs [12–16]. Indeed, Si-based microelectronics has reached physical limits when it comes to nanoscale devices; the III-V materials and especially InGaAs appear as an appealing alternative for next-generation devices such as terahertz (THz) [17] and quantum computing applications [18]. InGaAs MOSFETs were recently shown exhibiting a promising mobility of 1100 cm<fnref n="2" />/V·s, significantly higher than that of state-of-the-art Si MOSFETs [19]. Furthermore, InGaAs offers high data rate transfer and high performance communication for photonic application [20] and is particularly appealing for photovoltaic applications, as it can theoretically provide a maximum efficiency of 49% [21]. However, to achieve a fully functional device, it is crucial to improve the metal/semiconductor contact issues. Ni proved to be a promising option for InGaAs as a contact material because it leads to a reliable ohmic contact, which is a major advantage [22,23]. In this work, we chose the Ni/GaAs metal-semiconductor system to understand the different phenomena that may occur upon the various fabrication processes

<footnote n="1">¹ IM2NP, CNRS UMR 7334, Aix-Marseille University, 13397 Marseille, France; selma.rabhi@ensmm-annaba.dz (S.R.); carine.perrin-pellegrino@im2np.fr (C.P.-P.); alain.portavoce@im2np.fr (A.P.); khalid.hoummada@im2np.fr (K.H.)</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² L3M, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines et de la Métallurgie, Annaba, Sidi Amar 23000, Algeria; mohamed-cherif.benoudia@ensmm-annaba.dz</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Nanoelectronics Devices Computational Group, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK; k.kalna@swansea.ac.uk</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: nouredine.oueldna@im2np.fr</footnote>
since the GaAs substrates are similar to InGaAs processes due to the complete miscibility of In and Ga in the zinc-blende structure [24,25]. This is why the understanding of phenomena involved in both Ni/GaAs [26] and Ni/InAs [27] solid-state reactions is crucial for the fabrication and development of components for optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and microelectronics based on III-V semiconductors.

The solid-state reaction between metal films and GaAs substrates has been conducted to achieve intermetallic compounds with good and stable contact [28–31]. The solid state reaction between Ni film and GaAs substrate leads to the epitaxial formation of the intermetallic Ni₃GaAs phase [26,32–35]. The growth of the phases is coupled and depends on the mass-balance at the interfaces, which itself depends on the diffusion of Ni, Ga, and As species. This step requires a good control of the phases’ formation, their kinetics, and the involved phenomena to provide a global and predictive response to the realization of the devices. The characteristics of the reactions occurring in thin films such as kinetics, sequence, etc., are different from the case of bulk materials. The differences are related to the thickness of the deposited metal [36] and the presence of numerous interfaces compared to the volume of the films considered [37,38]. For that reason, the investigation of the thickness effect of the intermetallic phase formation is crucial. Aside from electrical performances, it is also necessary to understand the so-formed material in terms of phase sequence, thermodynamics, and texture. The control of the phase formation and uniformity of the intermetallic interface is essential in the case of thin films. The formed phase should be in metastable equilibrium with the substrate to guarantee a stable contact.

Hence in this work, the solid-state reactions between 20, 100, and 500 nm-thick Ni films and GaAs substrate have been investigated using the state-of-the-art characterization techniques. In situ and ex situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and pole figures have been carried out to characterize the initial state, texture, and sequence of the films’ phase formation. Through atom probe tomography (APT), the stoichiometry and the homogeneity of the so-formed intermetallic phase were defined.

## 2. Materials and Methods

Three different thicknesses (20, 100, and 500 nm) of Ni metal were deposited on GaAs (100) wafers in a commercial magnetron sputtering system exhibiting a base pressure of 10⁻⁸ Torr. All the samples were deposited at room temperature using a 99.9999% pure Ar gas flow (5 × 10⁻³ mbar) to sputter a 300 mm-wide 99.99% pure Ni target purchased from CODEX international. The sputtering power of the Ni target was 150 W. The sputtering is more suitable than molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) for mass-production applications [39]. The GaAs (100) substrate was cleaned with diluted nitric acid (HNO₃) before Ni deposition. The Ni layer was capped with a 20-nm-thick layer of TiN to protect the samples from atmosphere contamination. The capping process was performed in the same setup as Ni deposition and the samples were transferred from one chamber to another without breaking vacuum. The thickness of the Ni and TiN layers for both the 20- and 100-nm-thick samples were confirmed by X-ray reflectivity and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The thickness of the 500 nm-thick sample was checked using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in the cross-sectional mode. The structure of the as-deposited films was identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the Bragg-Brentano geometry in a two-circle PANalytical X’Pert MPD-PRO setup equipped with an X’Celerator detector designed for high-speed data collection, using a Cu Kα source (λKα = 0.15418 nm). In addition, to make pole figures on the 20- and 100-nm-thick Ni samples, the samples were characterized using the X’Pert MRD-PRO diffractometer with four circles to obtain the projection of the intensity I2θ (φ, ψ) in a two-dimensional form. The pole figure simulations and drawings of crystal structures were carried out using the CaRIne Crystallography software [40]. The cross-sectional SEM images were acquired using a Helios NanoLab DualBeam Ga+ focus ion beam (FIB) from FEI. For in situ XRD measurements, the samples (20-, 100-, and 500-nm-thick layer of Ni) were mounted in an Anton-Paar TTK600 temperature chamber equipped with a heating stage under vacuum (10⁻⁶ Torr) from 50 °C to 400 °C using a step of 10 °C with a
5 °C·min⁻¹ ramp. For each step, a diffractogram was recorded for 8 min. The Atom Probe Tomography technique was used to analyze the atomic distribution in three dimensions of the 500-nm-thick layer annealed at 200 °C for 1 h. A specific specimen preparation was realized with the focused ion beam (FIB) standard lift-out technique. In this paper, a low-energy ion beam of 2–5 keV was used to clean the top of the sample at the final step of the specimen preparation. APT analyses were carried out in a LEAP 3000X HR instrument. The laser pulsing rate was set to 200 kHz, and the detection rate was kept to 0.002 event/pulse by increasing the applied voltage. During the analysis, the specimen temperature was set to 54 K. The IVAS 3.6.8 software was used for the reconstruction, visualization, and analyses of the APT data.

### 3. Results

The solid-state reaction that leads to the formation of an intermetallic phase in the Ni/GaAs system depends on the initial state of the as-deposited samples. Figure 1a shows the XRD signals measured for three samples with different Ni thicknesses (20, 100, and 500 nm). For the 100- and 500-nm-thick films, we observed two peaks at 44° and 52°, which correspond to (111) and (200) planes of the fcc structure of Ni. For the 20-nm-thick Ni film, only the (200) peak at 52° was observed, while the intense peak (111) of the Ni phase was not recognized. We can conclude that the 20-nm Ni sample shows a different texture in comparison to the thicker samples. The (200) orientation is favored at low thicknesses that corresponds to the orientation of the GaAs substrate. In addition, for the same sample, a new peak is recorded at 42°, corresponding to the (200) plane of TiN cubic structure; this is probably related to the texture of the 20-nm-thick Ni film. As we have mentioned earlier, all the samples were protected by a 20-nm-thick TiN layer in order to see the interface morphology present in the sample. Figure 1b shows the cross section of the 500-nm-thick Ni sample. We can see that the interface between Ni and GaAs is homogeneous, and that the thickness of the Ni layer is 512 ± 2 nm.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** (a) Ex situ XRD diagrams for the as deposited Ni/GaAs samples with different Ni layer thicknesses (20 nm, 100 nm, and 500 nm) and (b) cross-section SEM image of the as-deposited 500 nm-thick sample.</figcaption></figure>

Figure 2a,b shows the pole figures of the as-deposited 20- and 100-nm-thick Ni layers. The pole figure was performed at the angular position of the Ni peak at d = 2.04 Å corresponding to the (111) crystallographic plane. The angular ranges probed were φ [0°, 360°] and ψ [0°, 84°]. The intensity I is represented as a function of φ and ψ, and it is characterized by the color nuances going from red to purple for the weakest to the strongest intensities, respectively. The concentric circles on the diagram define the angles ψ with a step of 10°. Figure 2c presents a schematic diagram of diffraction patterns simulated for the capping layer TiN, the substrate GaAs, and the metal layer fcc-Ni, with the lattice parameter a = 3.52 Å. Figure 2a shows, for the 2-nm-thick Ni sample, four poles located
at $\psi \approx 45^{\circ}$ and $\varphi \approx 46^{\circ}$, 136$^{\circ}$, 226$^{\circ}$, and 316$^{\circ}$ corresponding to the poles (110) of GaAs substrate (blue circle); right above these poles, four other less intense poles are located at $\psi \approx 55^{\circ}$ (with $\varphi \approx 46^{\circ}$, 136$^{\circ}$, 226$^{\circ}$, and 316$^{\circ}$) corresponding to (111) poles of fcc-Ni structure (green circle), and the pole in the center corresponding to (200) pole of the TiN layer. However, Figure 2b shows the pole figure measured for the 100-nm-thick Ni. Only the (110) poles of the GaAs substrate at $\psi \approx 45^{\circ}$ and $\varphi \approx 43^{\circ}$, 132$^{\circ}$, 223$^{\circ}$, and 312$^{\circ}$ were observed. As a result, the grains of the Ni are randomly oriented, which is a sign of the absence of epitaxial relation with the substrate for the thick films. This is in agreement with the XRD results. The same result was observed for the 500-nm-thick sample.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Experimental pole figure around the Ni (111) position at $d = 2.04$ Å for (a) 20-nm-thick Ni and (b) 100-nm-thick Ni samples after deposition on GaAs and (c) simulation of the pole figures of: Ni FCC, TiN, and GaAs substrate.</figcaption></figure>

In situ XRD characterization described below shows the evolution of the first phase 'Ni₃GaAs' after a solid-state reaction between Ni film (with different thicknesses) and GaAs (100) substrate. The overall goal was to understand the thickness effect on the phase formation under annealing. Figure 3 illustrates the XRD results for the three samples presented as an intensity color map. The y-axis carries the 2θ angle, the x-axis carries the annealing temperature, and the intensity is represented by a color level code. The as-deposited 20-nm-thick Ni film already presents three diffraction peaks at RT, one at 2θ = 52° corresponding to Ni (200), and two at 2θ = 42° and 73° corresponding respectively to the atomic planes (200) and (311) of the TiN phase (Figure 3a). From 190 °C, the Ni (200) peak disappears, and two other peaks appear at 2θ = 31.6° and 65.9°. These peaks belong to the ternary phase (Ni₃GaAs) that consumed the Ni layer and correspond to the atomic planes (10 ¯11) and (20 ¯22) of Ni₃GaAs [35]. Figure 3b,c shows the 100-nm- and the 500-nm-thick Ni samples, respectively. As shown below, only two diffraction peaks are observed at
$2\theta = 44.6^\circ$ and $52.1^\circ$ corresponding to the atomic planes (111) and (200) of the fcc-structure of Ni, respectively. For the 100-nm-thick sample, the Ni peaks disappear around $200\ ^\circ C$ unlike the 500-nm-thick sample, where Ni is present until the end of annealing. At $140\ ^\circ C$, two peaks appear at $2\theta = 31.6^\circ$ and $65.9^\circ$ that correspond to the atomic planes (10\bar{1}1) and (20\bar{2}2) of $Ni_3GaAs$, respectively. For the 100- and 500-nm-thick samples, above the $360\ ^\circ C$ and $330\ ^\circ C$ temperatures, respectively, we observe the appearance of one peak at $71^\circ$, which probably corresponds to the atomic plan (20\bar{2}2) of the binary phase NiAs [41].

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** In situ XRD diagrams ($\lambda = 1.5418\AA$) recorded for: (a) 20 nm; (b) 100 nm; and (c) 500 nm Ni on GaAs (100) during an annealing between 50 $^\circ C$ and 400 $^\circ C$.</figcaption></figure>

Figure 3 presents the APT measurements performed on the 500-nm-thick sample annealed at 200 $^\circ C$ for 1 h in order to quantitatively measure the chemical composition of the formed phase. As expected, a homogenous distribution of all atoms is observed,
suggesting the presence of a single phase; no impurities were observed that could be beneficial to the electrical properties. The composition is deduced from the mass spectrum, in which no mass overlaps were found. The chemical composition averaged over the whole volume was 61.1% Ni, 17.7% Ga, and 21.2% As, indicating that the initial proportions of Ga and As in the substrate are almost kept in the so-formed phase. The composition corresponds to Ni₃₀Ga₀.₈₉As₁.₀₆, which confirms the formation of the Ni₃GaAs as the first phase for the thickest sample. This is in good agreement with the stoichiometry found for the 20-nm-thick Ni film [26].

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** APT microscopy performed on the 500 nm Ni/GaAs after an isothermal annealing at 200 °C, Cross-sectional view of a 10 nm-thick slice (xz plane) extracted from 3D volume showing the distribution of Ni, Ga, and As atoms (green, yellow, and pink dots, respectively).</figcaption></figure>

The second phase is observed for the 100- and 500-nm-thick Ni samples through the presence of a diffraction peak at 2θ = 71°. This peak appears at about 360 °C for the 100-nm-thick Ni sample (Figure 3b) and at 330 °C for the 500-nm-thick sample (Figure 3c). In contrast, no peak was observed for the second phase for the 20-nm-thick sample (Figure 3a). We assumed that for the 20-nm-thick Ni, the formation temperature was probably higher than 400 °C (Figure 3). For this purpose, the 20-nm-thick Ni was annealed up to 420 °C for 2 h in a vacuum oven. The ex situ XRD measurement is presented in Figure 5. Two new peaks have been observed at 2θ = 33° and 71°, corresponding to the atomic planes (10 ¯11) and (20 ¯22) of the NiAs phase, respectively [41] (Figure 5).

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Ex situ XRD diffractogram for 20-nm-thick Ni sample annealed at 420 °C.</figcaption></figure>
## 4. Discussion

The ex situ XRD and pole figure measurements showed that the texture of Ni differs with the film thickness increasing. Thus, Ni in the three samples has a fcc structure. Our findings are different from the previous published work, where the Ni film in a range from 1 to 40 nm thickness exists under two forms. The bcc-Ni structure can be indeed epitaxially grown on a GaAs (001) substrate at room temperature up to 2.5 nm [39,42–45]. However, this bcc structure is metastable. While the thickness is increased (beyond 2.5 nm), the bcc-Ni crystal starts to transform into a more stable fcc-Ni structure. The fcc-Ni is always epitaxial with the GaAs substrate until 40 nm of Ni [39,42]. However, Figure 2 shows that Ni film exists only in the fcc structure in both 20- and 100-nm-thick samples. There is no sign of the bcc structure. For the 20-nm-thick Ni, the Ni layer is in epitaxy with the GaAs substrate; the epitaxy relationship between the Ni film and the GaAs substrate is: (001) Ni//(001) GaAs and [111] Ni//[110] GaAs (Figure 2). TEM observations used to measure the thickness of the different layers show that the 20-nm-thick TiN layer is polycrystalline on all the samples. However, TiN diffraction is in general not detected in our case, probably due to a TiN texture not compatible with our diffraction conditions (Bragg-Brentano geometry and 35° to 60° diffraction window). The sample with the thinner 20-nm-thick Ni film is an exception. Indeed, a single TiN diffraction peak is detected at 42° corresponding to the (200) atomic planes of the TiN fcc structure (Figure 1a). Since the relation of epitaxy between Ni and GaAs, favoring the alignment of the fcc-Ni (200) planes parallel to the surface, is only observed for this sample, the specific texture of the TiN grains in this sample seems to be related to the specific texture of Ni. The 20-nm-thick Ni film is epitaxial on GaAs; however, as the film became thicker (≥100 nm), the grains were oriented randomly. We observed that the pole figure for the 500-nm-thick layer was identical to the 100-nm-thick Ni since they show the same XRD results (Figure 1). There seems to be a transition thickness over which the Ni layer can no longer grow in epitaxy, between 40 and 100 nm.

In situ XRD and APT analysis shows that the first phase to form during the solid-state reaction between Ni film and GaAs substrate is Ni₃GaAs and not Ni₂GaAs [26], in contrary to what was reported in literature [34,46–48]. The epitaxial relationship between this phase and the GaAs substrate was also evidenced: (111) GaAs//(0001) Ni₃GaAs and [110] GaAs//[1120] Ni₃GaAs [26]. This relationship was first determined for the same thin film system [34] and, recently, for the intermetallic phase Ni₃In₀.₅₃Ga₀.₄₇As [49]. As the diffraction peaks according to our measurements are the same, we can assume that the identification of the first phase is the same for all the samples and that the growth is epitaxial with the same relationship.

With a stoichiometry of Ni₃GaAs, Ni should be the main diffusing species, as the Ga and As proportions are equivalent in the GaAs substrate [49]. Before the Ni consumption ends (Figure 3), Ni₃GaAs exhibits a composition gradient based on two thermodynamic equilibria (Ni/Ni₃GaAs and Ni₃GaAs/GaAs) between the Ni film and the GaAs substrate. When the Ni film is completely consumed for the 20- and 100-nm-thick samples (Figure 3a,b) or blocked for the 500-nm-thick sample (Figure 3c), the system evolves towards a single equilibrium between Ni₃GaAs and GaAs, resulting in the homogenization of the Ni₃GaAs composition [28]. This homogenization induces a change of composition, and as a result, a shift of the diffraction peaks towards high angles [27,49].

The formation temperature of the Ni₃GaAs phase was found to be different between the 20-nm-thick Ni sample and the two thicker 100-nm and 500-nm samples (Figure 3). It drops down from 190 °C for 20-nm-thick Ni film to 140 °C for 100- and 500-nm-thick Ni films (ΔT ≈ 50 °C). Thus, the phase needs more energy to form (at 190 °C) for the 20-nm-thick sample in comparison to the two other samples for which the same phase is formed at a lower temperature (140 °C). This can be explained by the nature of the initial germination interface of the phase. As we have seen, the texture of Ni is not the same between small thicknesses and large thicknesses, and to germinate a phase at the
Ni/GaAs interface, a germination barrier ΔG*, which is related to the interface energy γ, must be exceeded:

$$ \Delta G^* = \frac{16\pi\Delta\gamma^3}{3(\Delta G_V - \Delta G_S)} \quad (1) $$

where (ΔG<sub>V</sub> − ΔG<sub>S</sub>) is the driving force linked to the formation of the same phase. Δγ is the difference between the interface energy after phase formation and the initial interface energy, given by:

$$ \Delta\gamma = \underbrace{(\gamma_{\text{phase/GaAs}} + \gamma_{\text{phase/Ni}})}_{\gamma \text{ after formation}} - \underbrace{\gamma_{\text{Ni/GaAs}}}_{\text{initial interface}} \quad (2) $$

The energy of a coherent interface is known to be lower than the energy of the incoherent one γ<sub>epitaxy</sub> << γ<sub>incoherent</sub> [50]. Moreover, the phase/GaAs interface energy is always the same regardless of the Ni thickness (because the phase is epitaxial on GaAs), so the activation energy ΔG* depends only on the initial interface energy of Ni/GaAs (Equation (2)). As the Ni is epitaxial (coherent interface) with GaAs substrate for the 20-nm-thick Ni in this case, the system provides more ΔG*<sub>epitaxial</sub> energy to germinate a new phase and the interface energy budget is larger in this case (Equation (1)). For the incoherent interface, the germination barrier ΔG* is low, which makes the phase germination easy, thanks to the initial incoherent interface energy that minimizes the interface energy budget (γ). This corresponds to the cases of 100- and 500-nm-thick layers, explaining that the Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs phase appears at 140 °C. As a result, the initial state of the interface Ni/GaAs is the reason behind the different formation temperature of the first phase.

The formation temperature of the second phase also varies with the thickness of the Ni. It is higher for the 20-nm-thick sample compared to the other two samples (Figures 3 and 5). We can explain this difference by TiN/Ni interface nature. From the pole figures (Figure 2), TiN is epitaxial with Ni of 20 nm. However, no texturing for TiN was observed for the two other samples. As a result, TiN/Ni interface is coherent for the 20-nm-thick Ni sample, which explains this delay in the second phase formation. It is possible that NiAs was formed due to the change in the chemical composition of the Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs ternary phase. One can assume that the ternary phase composition changes during the reaction from Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs to NiAs as follows: Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs → Ni<sub>3-x</sub>GaAs<sub>1-x</sub> + xNiAs [31,47,51].

## 5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the investigation of the initial state of the as-deposited samples of the Ni/GaAs system shows that there is no intermediate phase for the three 20-, 100-, and 500-nm-thick films, but the Ni is deposited with the fcc structure and it is in epitaxy with the GaAs substrate according to the relation (001) Ni// (001) GaAs and [111] Ni// [110] GaAs for the lowest thickness of Ni while for the highest thicknesses, the Ni is no longer in epitaxy. The reaction between 100- and 500-nm-thick Ni with GaAs allows the formation of the Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs phase from 140 °C; this low formation temperature can be considered as an advantage for the ohmic contacts for the targeted applications. This phase grows in epitaxy and verifies the same texture and epitaxy relationship found for the 20-nm-thick Ni film. There is no effect of the thickness on the chemical nature of the first intermetallic phase. The only difference is the formation temperature. We found that 20-nm-thick Ni starts to form at 190 °C due to the difference in the interface nature observed for Ni/GaAs when increasing the film thicknesses. We showed that the so-formed Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs phase undergoes a homogeneity of the composition after the total or partial consumption of Ni film. This composition homogenization is a consequence of the thermodynamic equilibria evolution. For all thicknesses, the intermetallic phase decomposes at the end of annealing into the Ni<sub>3-x</sub>GaAs<sub>1-x</sub> phase and the xNiAs binary phase of the same structure with the same texture as the so-formed Ni<sub>3</sub>GaAs phase.
**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, K.H.; methodology, K.H.; validation, K.H., C.P.-P. and N.O.; investigation, S.R., N.O. and C.P.-P.; resources, K.H. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R. and N.O.; writing—review and editing, K.H., C.P.-P., A.P., K.K. and M.C.B.; visualization, N.O. and S.R.; supervision, K.H.; project administration, K.H.; funding acquisition, K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research was funded by Campus France PHC Toubkal—grant number: TBK 18/65, PHC Tassili—grant number: 7MDU994, and “The APC was funded by Aix-Marseille University”.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors would like to thank Christian Lavoie for sample elaboration and the scientific discussion. The authors are grateful to Dominique Mangelinck for XRD analysis software.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Aissat, A.; Chenini, L.; Nacer, S.; Vilcot, J.P. Modeling and Simulation of GaAsPN/GaP Quantum Dot Structure for Solar Cell in Intermediate Band Solar Cell Applications. *Int. J. Energy Res.* **2022**, *46*, 10133–10142. [CrossRef]

2. Fujii, T.; Hiraki, T.; Aihara, T.; Nishi, H.; Takeda, K.; Sato, T.; Kakitsuka, T.; Tsuchizawa, T.; Matsuo, S. Development of an Epitaxial Growth Technique Using Iii-v on a Si Platform for Heterogeneous Integration of Membrane Photonic Devices on Si. *Appl. Sci.* **2021**, *11*, 1801. [CrossRef]

3. Kuyanov, P.; LaPierre, R.R. Photoluminescence and Photocurrent from InP Nanowires with InAsP Quantum Dots Grown on Si by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. *Nanotechnology* **2015**, *26*, 315202. [CrossRef]

4. Del Alamo, J.A. Nanometre-Scale Electronics with III-V Compound Semiconductors. *Nature* **2011**, *479*, 317–323. [CrossRef]

5. Zhang, G.; Takiguchi, M.; Tateno, K.; Tawara, T.; Notomi, M.; Gotoh, H. Telecom-Band Lasing in Single InP/InAs Heterostructure Nanowires at Room Temperature. *Sci. Adv.* **2019**, *5*, eaat8896. [CrossRef]

6. Varadhan, P.; Fu, H.C.; Kao, Y.C.; Horng, R.H.; He, J.H. An Efficient and Stable Photoelectrochemical System with 9% Solar-to-Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency via InGaP/GaAs Double Junction. *Nat. Commun.* **2019**, *10*, 2657. [CrossRef]

7. Essig, S.; Allebé, C.; Remo, T.; Geisz, J.F.; Steiner, M.A.; Horowitz, K.; Barraud, L.; Ward, J.S.; Schnabel, M.; Descœudres, A.; et al. Raising the One-Sun Conversion Efficiency of III-V/Si Solar Cells to 32.8% for Two Junctions and 35.9% for Three Junctions. *Nat. Energy* **2017**, *2*, 17144. [CrossRef]

8. Oktyabrsky, S.; Ye, P.D. *Fundamentals of III-V Semiconductor MOSFETs*; Oktyabrsky, S., Ye, P., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; ISBN 97814419151467.

9. Yacobi, B.G. Semiconductor Materials: An Introduction to Basic Principles; Microdevices; Springer Science & Business Media: Boston, MA, USA, 2003; ISBN 0-306-47361-5.

10. Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Zeng, M.; Lu, F.; Lv, T.; Chang, Y.; Lan, H.; Wei, B.; Sun, R.; Gao, J.; et al. Universal Growth of Ultra-Thin III-V Semiconductor Single Crystals. *Nat. Commun.* **2020**, *11*, 3979. [CrossRef]

11. Balaghi, L.; Shan, S.; Fotev, I.; Moebus, F.; Rana, R.; Venanzi, T.; Hübner, R.; Mikolajick, T.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M.; et al. High Electron Mobility in Strained GaAs Nanowires. *Nat. Commun.* **2021**, *12*, 6642. [CrossRef]

12. Jung, Y.; Shim, J.; Kwon, K.; You, J.B.; Choi, K.; Yu, K. Hybrid Integration of III-V Semiconductor Lasers on Silicon Waveguides Using Optofluidic Microbubble Manipulation. *Sci. Rep.* **2016**, *6*, 29841. [CrossRef]

13. Frank, D.J. Power-Constrained CMOS Scaling Limits. *IBM J. Res. Dev.* **2002**, *46*, 235–244. [CrossRef]

14. Sugawara, E.; Nikaido, H. Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK Efflux Systems of Acinetobacter Baumannii Compared with Those of the AcrAB-TolC System of Escherichia Coli. *Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.* **2014**, *58*, 7250–7257. [CrossRef]

15. Chen, R.; Tran, T.T.D.; Ng, K.W.; Ko, W.S.; Chuang, L.C.; Sedgwick, F.G.; Chang-Hasnain, C. Nanolasers Grown on Silicon. *Nat. Photonics* **2011**, *5*, 170–175. [CrossRef]

16. Rio Calvo, M.; Rodriguez, J.B.; Cornet, C.; Cerutti, L.; Ramonda, M.; Trampert, A.; Patriarche, G.; Tournié, É. Crystal Phase Control during Epitaxial Hybridization of III-V Semiconductors with Silicon. *Adv. Electron. Mater.* **2022**, *8*, 2100777. [CrossRef]

17. Zota, C.B.; Convertino, C.; Deshpande, V.; Merkle, T.; Sousa, M.; Caimi, D.; Czornomaz, L. InGaAs-on-Insulator MOSFETs Featuring Scaled Logic Devices and Record RF Performance. In Proceedings of the Digest of Technical Papers—Symposium on VLSI Technology, Honolulu, HI, USA, 18–22 June 2018; Volume 2018, pp. 165–166.

18. Zota, C.B.; Morf, T.; Muller, P.; Convertino, C.; Filipp, S.; Riess, W.; Czornomaz, L. III-V-on-CMOS Devices and Circuits: Opportunities in Quantum Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 December 2019; pp. 31.8.1–31.8.4.

19. Cai, X.; Vardi, A.; Grajal, J.; Del Alamo, J.A. A New Technique for Mobility Extraction in MOSFETs in the Presence of Prominent Gate Oxide Trapping: Application to InGaAs MOSFETs. *IEEE Trans. Electron Devices* **2020**, *67*, 3075–3081. [CrossRef]
20. Ramirez, J.M.; Elfaiki, H.; Verolet, T.; Besancon, C.; Gallet, A.; Néel, D.; Hassan, K.; Olivier, S.; Jany, C.; Malhouitre, S.; et al. III-V-on-Silicon Integration: From Hybrid Devices to Heterogeneous Photonic Integrated Circuits. *IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.* **2020**, *26*, 6100213. [CrossRef]

21. Fafard, S.; Masson, D.P. High-Efficiency and High-Power Multijunction InGaAs/InP Photovoltaic Laser Power Converters for 1470 Nm. *Photonics* **2022**, *9*, 438. [CrossRef]

22. Ivana; Lim Foo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Pan, J.; Kong, E.; Samuel Owen, M.H.; Yeo, Y.-C. Crystal Structure and Epitaxial Relationship of Ni 4 InGaAs 2 Films Formed on InGaAs by Annealing. *J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom.* **2013**, *31*, 012202. [CrossRef]

23. Shekhter, P.; Mehari, S.; Ritter, D.; Eizenberg, M. Epitaxial NiInGaAs Formed by Solid State Reaction on in 0.53 Ga 0.47 As: Structural and Chemical Study. *J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom.* **2013**, *31*, 031205. [CrossRef]

24. Müller, E.K.; Richards, J.L. Miscibility of III-V Semiconductors Studied by Flash Evaporation. *J. Appl. Phys.* **1964**, *35*, 1233–1241. [CrossRef]

25. Adachi, S. *Propreties of Group-IV, III-V and II-VI Semi-Conductors*; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2005; ISBN 0470090324.

26. Rabhi, S.; Perrin-Pellegrino, C.; Zhiou, S.; Benoudia, M.C.; Texier, M.; Hoummada, K. Phase Formation between Ni Thin Films and GaAs Substrate. *Scr. Mater.* **2017**, *141*, 28–31. [CrossRef]

27. Patout, L.; Rabhi, S.; Perrin-Pellegrino, C.; Charaï, A.; Hoummada, K. Structure and Chemistry Investigations of Ni3InAs Thin Film on InAs Substrate. *Intermetallics* **2020**, *125*, 106901. [CrossRef]

28. Guivarc'h, A.; Guérin, R.; Caulet, J.; Poudoulec, A.; Fontenille, J. Metallurgical Study of Ni/GaAs Contacts. II. Interfacial Reactions of Ni Thin Films on (111) and (001) GaAs. *J. Appl. Phys.* **1989**, *66*, 2129–2136. [CrossRef]

29. Lahav, A.; Eizenberg, M.; Komen, Y. In Layered Structures, Epitaxy, and Interfaces. *Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.* **1985**, *37*, 641.

30. Shiau, F.Y.; Chang, Y.A.; Chen, L.J. Interfacial Reactions of Cobalt Thin Films on (001) GaAs. *J. Electron. Mater.* **1988**, *17*, 433–441. [CrossRef]

31. Dukarov, S.V.; Petrushenko, S.I.; Miroshnychenko, V.V.; Nevgasimov, O.O.; Sukhov, V.N. Effect of Temperature on Phase Formation in Thin Bilayer Ni/GaAs Films. In *Advances in Thin Films, Nanostructured Materials, and Coatings*; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 297–307.

32. Lahav, A.; Eizenberg, M.; Komem, Y. Epitaxial Phases Formation Due to Interaction Between Ni Thin Films and GaAs. *MRS Proc.* **1984**, *37*, 641–646. [CrossRef]

33. Poudoulec, A.; Guenais, B.; Guivarc'h, A.; Guerin, R.; Caulet, J.; Flohic, M. Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Epitaxial Metallic Compounds on GaAs (Ni-GaAs System). *J. Appl. Phys* **1988**, *43*, 265–266.

34. Ogawa, M. Alloying Reaction in Thin Nickel Films Deposited on GaAs. *Thin Solid Films* **1980**, *70*, 181–189. [CrossRef]

35. Sands, T.; Keramidas, V.G.; Yu, A.J.; Yu, K.M.; Gronsky, R.; Washburn, J. Ni, Pd, and Pt on GaAs: A Comparative Study of Interfacial Structures, Compositions, and Reacted Film Morphologies. *J. Mater. Res.* **1987**, *2*, 262–275. [CrossRef]

36. De Schutter, B.; De Keyser, K.; Lavoie, C.; Detavernier, C. Texture in Thin Film Silicides and Germanides: A Review. *Appl. Phys. Rev.* **2016**, *3*, 031302. [CrossRef]

37. Philibert, J. Reactive Diffusion in Thin Films. *Appl. Surf. Sci.* **1991**, *53*, 74–81. [CrossRef]

38. Canali, C.; Majni, G.; Ottaviani, G.; Celotti, G. Phase Diagrams and Metal-Rich Silicide Formation. *J. Appl. Phys.* **1979**, *50*, 255–258. [CrossRef]

39. Minakawa, S.; Ohtake, M.; Futamoto, M.; Kirino, F.; Inaba, N. Metastable Bcc Phase Formation in 3 d Ferromagnetic Transition Metal Thin Films Sputter-Deposited on GaAs(100) Substrates. *J. Appl. Phys.* **2015**, *117*, 17A903. [CrossRef]

40. Boudias, C.; Monceau, D. CaRIne Crystallography 3.1. *DIVERGENT SA Cent. Transf.* **1989**, *60200*, 1989–1998.

41. Aminoff, G., XI. Untersuchungen Über Die Kristallstrukturen von Wurtzit Und Rotnickelkies. *Z. Krist.*—*Cryst. Mater.* **1923**, *58*, 203–219. [CrossRef]

42. Ohtake, M.; Futamoto, M.; Inaba, N. Formation of Bcc-Ni Thin Film on GaAs(100) Substrate and Phase Transformation from Bcc to Fcc. *Eur. Phys. J. B* **2013**, *86*, 222. [CrossRef]

43. Soda, T.; Minakawa, S.; Ohtake, M.; Futamoto, M.; Inaba, N. Bcc Phase Formation in Fe, Co, and Ni Thin Films Deposited on GaAs(110) Substrates. *IEEE Trans. Magn.* **2015**, *51*, 7000404. [CrossRef]

44. Tang, W.X.; Qian, D.; Wu, D.; Wu, Y.Z.; Dong, G.S.; Jin, X.F.; Chen, S.M.; Jiang, X.M.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, Z. Growth and Magnetism of Ni Films on GaAs(0 0 1). *J. Magn. Magn. Mater.* **2002**, *240*, 404–406. [CrossRef]

45. Tian, C.S.; Qian, D.; Wu, D.; He, R.H.; Wu, Y.Z.; Tang, W.X.; Yin, L.F.; Shi, Y.S.; Dong, G.S.; Jin, X.F.; et al. Body-Centered-Cubic Ni and Its Magnetic Properties. *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **2005**, *94*, 137210. [CrossRef]

46. Solomon, J.S.; Smith, S.R. Auger Sputter Profiling and Factor Analysis of Thermally Treated Ni–GaAs Structures: The Influence of Oxygen on Compounding and Diffusion. *J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film.* **1987**, *5*, 1809–1815. [CrossRef]

47. Lahav, A.; Eizenberg, M.; Komem, Y. Interfacial Reactions between Ni Films and GaAs. *J. Appl. Phys.* **1986**, *60*, 991–1001. [CrossRef]

48. Scobey, I.H.; Wallace, C.A.; Ward, R.C.C. A Topotactic Reaction between Nickel and Gallium Arsenide. *J. Appl. Crystallogr.* **1973**, *6*, 425–428. [CrossRef]
49. Perrin, C.; Ghegin, E.; Zhiou, S.; Nemouchi, F.; Rodriguez, P.; Gergaud, P.; Maugis, P.; Mangelinck, D.; Hoummada, K. Formation of Ni3InGaAs Phase in Ni/InGaAs Contact at Low Temperature. *Appl. Phys. Lett.* **2016**, *109*, 014115. [CrossRef]

50. Porter, D.A.; Easterling, K.E.; Easterling, K.E. *Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys (Revised Reprint)*; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009; ISBN 9781439883570.

51. Guérin, R.; Guivarc’h, A. Comment on “Phase Equilibria of the Ga-Ni-As Ternary System” [J. Appl. Phys. **1997**, *82*, 493–495. [CrossRef]