# Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST) science: Planetary and cometary atmospheres

Martin Cordiner, Alexander Thelen, Thibault Cavalie, Richard Cosentino, Leigh N. Fletcher, Mark Gurwell, Katherine de Kleer, Yi-Jehng Kuan, Emmanuel Lellouch, Arielle Moullet, et al.

► To cite this version:

Martin Cordiner, Alexander Thelen, Thibault Cavalie, Richard Cosentino, Leigh N. Fletcher, et al. Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST) science: Planetary and cometary atmospheres. Open Research Europe, 2024, 4, pp.78. 10.12688/openreseurope.17473.1. insu-04853454

HAL Id: insu-04853454

https://insu.hal.science/insu-04853454v1

Submitted on 23 Dec 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

CASE STUDY

# Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST)
## science: Planetary and cometary atmospheres

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Martin Cordiner<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />, Alexander Thelen<fnref n="3" />, Thibault Cavalie<fnref n="4" />,<fnref n="5" />, Richard Cosentino<fnref n="6" />,
Leigh N. Fletcher<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="7" />, Mark Gurwell<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="8" />, Katherine de Kleer<fnref n="3" />, Yi-Jehng Kuan<fnref n="9" />,
Emmanuel Lellouch<fnref n="5" />, Arielle Moullet<fnref n="10" />, Conor Nixon<fnref n="11" />, Imke de Pater<fnref n="12" />,
Nicholas Teanby<fnref n="13" />, Bryan Butler<fnref n="14" />, Steven Charnley<fnref n="1" />, Stefanie Milam<fnref n="1" />,
Raphael Moreno<fnref n="5" />, Mark Booth<fnref n="15" />, Pamela Klaassen<fnref n="15" />, Claudia Cicone<fnref n="16" />,
Tony Mroczkowski<fnref n="17" />, Luca Di Mascolo<fnref n="18" />⁻<fnref n="21" />, Doug Johnstone<fnref n="22" />,<fnref n="23" />,
Eelco van Kampen<fnref n="17" />, Minju Lee<fnref n="24" />, Daizhong Liu<fnref n="25" />,<fnref n="26" />, Thomas Maccarone<fnref n="27" />,
Amelie Saintonge<fnref n="25" />,<fnref n="28" />, Matthew Smith<fnref n="29" />, Sven Wedemeyer<fnref n="30" />

<footnote n="1">¹Astrochemistry Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771-0003, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Department of Physics, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, 20064, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Universite de Bordeaux, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 33615, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, Sorbonne Universite, Meudon, 92195, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="8">⁸Center for Astrophysics, Harvard Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="9">⁹National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, 116, Taiwan</footnote>

<footnote n="10">¹⁰National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="11">¹¹Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="12">¹²Departments of Astronomy and of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="13">¹³School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 1RJ, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="14">¹⁴National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM, 87801, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="15">¹⁵UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="16">¹⁶Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0315, Norway</footnote>

<footnote n="17">¹⁷European Southern Observatory, Garching, 85748, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="18">¹⁸Laboratoire Lagrange, Universite Cote d'Azur, Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, 06304, France</footnote>

<footnote n="19">¹⁹INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Trieste, 34131, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="20">²⁰IFPU - Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Univers, Trieste, 34014, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="21">²¹Astronomy Unit, Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34131, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="22">²²NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Centre, Victoria, BC, V9E 2E7, Canada</footnote>

<footnote n="23">²³Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C, Canada</footnote>

<footnote n="24">²⁴Cosmic Dawn Center, København, Denmark</footnote>

<footnote n="25">²⁵Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching bei München, Bayern, D-85748, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="26">²⁶Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China</footnote>

<footnote n="27">²⁷Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 79409-1051, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="28">²⁸Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, England, WC1E 6BT, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="29">²⁹School of Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 3AA, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="30">³⁰Rosseland Centre for Solar Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, N-0315, Norway</footnote>
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17473.1

Latest published: 12 Dec 2024, 4:78

https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17473.2

## Abstract

The study of planets and small bodies within our Solar System is fundamental for understanding the formation and evolution of the Earth and other planets. Compositional and meteorological studies of the giant planets provide a foundation for understanding the nature of the most commonly observed exoplanets, while spectroscopic observations of the atmospheres of terrestrial planets, moons, and comets provide insights into the past and present-day habitability of planetary environments, and the availability of the chemical ingredients for life. While prior and existing (sub)millimeter observations have led to major advances in these areas, progress is hindered by limitations in the dynamic range, spatial and temporal coverage, as well as sensitivity of existing telescopes and interferometers. Here, we summarize some of the key planetary science use cases that factor into the design of the Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST), a proposed 50-m class single dish facility: (1) to more fully characterize planetary wind fields and atmospheric thermal structures, (2) to measure the compositions of icy moon atmospheres and plumes, (3) to obtain detections of new, astrobiologically relevant gases and perform isotopic surveys of comets, and (4) to perform synergistic, temporally-resolved measurements in support of dedicated interplanetary space missions. The improved spatial coverage (several arcminutes), resolution (~ 1.2" – 12"), bandwidth (several tens of GHz), dynamic range (~ 10⁵) and sensitivity (~ 1 mK km s⁻¹) required by these science cases would enable new insights into the chemistry and physics of planetary environments, the origins of prebiotic molecules and the habitability of planetary systems in general.

## Plain language summary

Our present understanding of what planets and comets are made of, and how their atmospheres move and change, has been greatly influenced by observations using existing and prior telescopes operating at wavelengths in the millimeter/submillimeter range (between the radio and infrared parts of the electromagnetic spectrum), yet major gaps exist in our knowledge of these diverse phenomena. Here, we describe the need for a new telescope capable of simultaneously observing features on very large and very small scales, and covering a very large spread of intrinsic brightness, in planets and comets. Such a telescope is required for mapping storms on giant planets, measuring the compositions of the atmospheres and plumes of icy moons, detecting new molecules in comets and planetary atmospheres, and to act as a complement for measurements by current and future interplanetary spacecraft

## Open Peer Review

### Approval Status

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

1. Hideo Sagawa ID, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

2. Takahiro Iino, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

3. Kaustubh Hakim ID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Any reports and responses or comments on the article can be found at the end of the article.
missions. We discuss the limitations of currently-available
millimeter/submillimeter telescopes, and summarize the
requirements and applications of a new and larger, more sensitive
facility operating at these wavelengths: the Atacama Large Aperture
Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST).

Keywords

Planets, Comets, Planetary atmospheres, Spectral lines, Spectral imaging, Submillimeter, Instrumentation

HE

This article is included in the Horizon Europe
gateway.

H2020

This article is included in the Horizon 2020
gateway.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

This article is included in the Marie-Sklodowska-
Curie Actions (MSCA) gateway.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

This article is included in the Astronomy,
Astrophysics & Cosmology gateway.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

This article is included in the Atacama Large
Aperture Submillimeter Telescope Design Study
collection.
**Corresponding author:** Martin Cordiner (martin.cordiner@nasa.gov)

**Author roles:** **Cordiner M:** Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Thelen A:** Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Cavalie T:** Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing; **Cosentino R:** Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Fletcher LN:** Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Gurwell M:** Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **de Kleer K:** Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Kuan YJ:** Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Lellouch E:** Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Moulet A:** Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing; **Nixon C:** Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing; **de Pater I:** Investigation, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Teanby N:** Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; **Butler B:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Charnley S:** Funding Acquisition, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing; **Milam S:** Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing; **Moreno R:** Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing; **Booth M:** Conceptualization, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing; **Klaassen P:** Conceptualization, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing; **Cicone C:** Conceptualization, Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing; **Mroczkowski T:** Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing; **Di Mascolo L:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Johnstone D:** Writing – Review & Editing; **van Kampen E:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Lee M:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Liu D:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Maccarone T:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Saintonge A:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Smith M:** Writing – Review & Editing; **Wedemeyer S:** Writing – Review & Editing

**Competing interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

**Grant information:** This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No [951815](Towards an Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope [AtLAST]). This work received support from NASA's Solar System Observations (SSO) Program, National Science Foundation (NSF) grant \#AST-2009253, NASA's Planetary Science Division Internal Scientist Funding Program through the Fundamental Laboratory Research work package (FLaRe), the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council grant ST/Y000676/1. LDM acknowledges support by the French government, through the UCA (J.E.D.I.) Investments in the Future project managed by the National Research Agency (ANR) with the reference number ANR-15-IDEX-01. ML acknowledges support from the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 101107795. SW acknowledges support by the Research Council of Norway through the EMISSA project (project number 286853) and the Centres of Excellence scheme, project number 262622 ("Rosseland Centre for Solar Physics"). *The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.*

**Copyright:** © 2024 Cordiner M et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**How to cite this article:** Cordiner M, Thelen A, Cavalie T et al. Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST) science: Planetary and cometary atmospheres [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] Open Research Europe 2024, 4:78 https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17473.1

**First published:** 24 Apr 2024, 4:78 https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17473.1
## Introduction

Since the latter half of the 20th century, (sub)millimeter (~0.3–3 mm; 100–950 GHz) telescope facilities have been increasingly employed for the study of planetary surfaces, atmospheres, and ring/moon systems. Brightness temperature measurements can be readily derived for large solar system objects using traditional single-dish radio facilities, while the high spectral resolution combined with increasing bandwidth and sensitivity of modern (sub)millimeter wave telescopes and interferometers has enabled pioneering spectroscopic surveys and spatial-spectral mapping of planetary bodies and comets. The measurement of thermal emission in the shallow subsurfaces of natural satellites, small bodies, and terrestrial planets fills the gap between radar sounding of the deep (>1 km) surface and the near surface temperatures derived from infrared observations.

The (sub)millimeter wavelength regime also provides access to rotational transitions from gas-phase molecules in planetary atmospheres, the observation of which leads to robust, spectroscopic molecular detections as well as abundance, temperature, and wind measurements with well-defined, and often high, degrees of quantitative accuracy. The available molecular species tend to be dominated by the more abundant reactive elements in our solar system (C, H, N, O, P and S), and therefore include hydrocarbons, oxides, hydrides, nitriles and other members of the class of organic molecules associated with terrestrial biology.

The Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (ATLAST) is proposed as a more powerful, ground-based, single-dish submillimeter facility to begin operating in the 2030s¹⁻⁴. Combining improved sensitivity, angular resolution and field-of-view, ATLAST would open new frontiers in our understanding of planetary atmospheres and surfaces, as well as providing more detailed characterization of the gases produced by comets. More sensitive access to the long-wavelength region of the spectrum is also crucial for providing supporting observations and large-scale context for the more focused measurements performed by interplanetary spacecraft missions. In particular, the availability of improved mapping capabilities, wider instantaneous bandwidth, and higher spatial resolution made possible by ATLAST would result in improvements in our ability to characterize and monitor dynamic and complex physical phenomena, such as winds and storms, as well as chemical processes (revealed by rotational spectroscopy), occurring in the atmospheres and on the surfaces of planetary bodies.

The study of ‘local’ planets in our Solar System also provides a fundamental baseline for interpreting the properties of the vast number of exoplanets that are now known to exist around other stars throughout the galaxy⁵. The paradigm within which we understand the environmental conditions, climate and possible habitability of exoplanets exists by virtue of the active development of an extensive knowledge-base on atmospheric (and bulk) chemical inventories and physical processes occurring in the planets, moons, and other minor bodies of our

Solar System. In this era of rapid discovery, it is thus more important than ever to develop and build new telescope facilities such as ATLAST, to continue to advance our understanding of the compositions, spatial and temporal features, and evolutionary processes occurring on the bodies within our Solar System.

## Prior/existing instruments and results

Single-dish radio/submillimeter facilities provide a wealth of unique and complementary observations to spacecraft and facilities at other wavelengths. The Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO), Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (IRAM) 30-m telescope, Green Bank Observatory (GBO), Arecibo radar facility, among others, were previously used to study the brightness temperatures of the Giant planets, Mars, Venus, and large satellites. They enabled study of the deep atmospheric composition of Gas and Ice Giants, characterization of the near subsurface properties of the Galilean Satellites, as well as compositional and dynamical studies of terrestrial planet and satellite atmospheres. These were complemented by early interferometric observations by the Very Large Array (VLA), Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Association (BIMA) array, Submillimeter Array (SMA), and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), enabling higher sensitivity and angular resolution studies⁶⁻¹⁸.

Cometary science — the study of our Solar System’s oldest, yet most pristine materials — has benefited hugely from advances in single-dish millimeter-wave instrumentation. The first detections of key organics HCN and CH₃OH in cometary comae were obtained through observations using the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) 11-m and IRAM 30-m telescopes in the 3 mm and 2 mm bands, respectively¹⁹,²⁰. Millimeter-wave spectroscopy continues to provide the primary method for remotely detecting and characterizing new molecules (including complex organic molecules) in cometary comae²¹, while also providing crucial insights into the origins of our solar system’s primitive materials via detailed studies of molecular isotopic ratios²²,²³. ALMA is currently revolutionizing the study of comets at (sub)millimeter wavelengths, revealing the coma and nucleus outgassing sources in unprecedented detail from the ground²⁴⁻²⁶, yet snapshot maps of the largest coma scales remain out of reach with present facilities. A new, highly-sensitive single-dish (sub)millimeter telescope with wide-field imaging capabilities will help advance coma mapping studies and help break new ground in our understanding of the chemical composition of comets.

Observations at (sub)millimeter wavelengths have enabled the detection and mapping of new molecular species in the atmospheres of various planets in our solar system. CO and HCN were first detected on Neptune in the early 1990s using the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) and CalTech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) telescopes²⁷, with abundances ~1000 times higher than predicted from thermochemical models. Similarly, CO, HCN, and HNC were detected on Pluto with recent ALMA observations²⁸, and a variety of trace gases have been discovered on Titan using millimeter-wave spectroscopy²⁹⁻³⁴.
Sub-millimeter observations can also be used to probe gas and ice giant interiors. For example, Neptune's very high observed CO abundance in the stratosphere and troposphere, combined with thermochemical models, has been used to argue for an ice-dominated interior³⁵⁻³⁷. However, a comet impact in the last few hundred years, as suggested by (sub)millimeter observations of stratospheric CO³⁶ and CS³⁸, would imply significant external flux into Neptune's atmosphere. Therefore, a rock dominated interior is also plausible³⁹ and more consistent with D/H ratio measurements if the interior is well mixed⁴⁰.

The Herschel Space Observatory provided numerous demonstrations of the power of (sub)millimeter single-dish heterodyne spectroscopy for characterizing planetary atmospheres, producing the first detection of water in the extended gaseous torus around Enceladus⁴¹. The Herschel Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared (HIFI) instrument also obtained the first detection of hydrogen isocyanide (HNC) in Titan's atmosphere⁴². Stratospheric H₂O measurements with HIFI have been used to demonstrate the cometary origin of water in Jupiter's stratosphere⁴³ and to constrain the background flux of interplanetary dust particles into Uranus' and Neptune's atmospheres⁴⁴. Fletcher et al.⁴⁵ used the Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE) instrument on Herschel to constrain the vertical distributions of phosphine, ammonia and methane on Saturn, as well as providing measurements of stratospheric water and precise upper limits for a range of exotic compounds including halides.

In general, the improvements in (sub)millimeter wave sensitivity and mapping capabilities ushered in by ALMA have led to major strides in our understanding of the compositions and dynamical states of planetary atmospheres, as well as satellite and small body surfaces⁷, 8, 12, 34, 38, 46–64. However, the lack of simultaneous, high-sensitivity total power observations hinders ALMA's ability to characterize localised/dynamical phenomena such as storms and plumes on rotating planetary surfaces, due to temporal smearing. A new, single-dish telescope with improved total power sensitivity and wide-field mapping capabilities is therefore required.

Instantaneous (snapshot) mapping over the entire area of a body is critical for detailed studies of the rapidly rotating and evolving atmospheres of solar system objects. Such studies have historically been the realm of interferometry, though the lack of short baselines in a typical interferometric array leads to spatial filtering of the resulting images, which can preclude reliable measurements of extended emission from larger bodies such as the giant planets and extended cometary comae. Further, the repositioning of antennas to larger configurations (such as the extended baselines of ALMA) may impede mapping of the giant planets during transient events, such as impacts and storms: impact events tell us both about the population, bulk properties, and volatile composition of potential impactors in the outer Solar System, while storms provide us access to the chemical composition deep below the topmost clouds, and reveal how dramatic meteorology

evolves in non-terrestrial and cold environments. Combined with their large angular scales (Figure 1) and total flux, the planets present challenging targets for observation of small brightness temperature variations or weak spectral lines against a strong background continuum at (sub)millimeter wavelengths, and therefore place stringent demands on the stability, calibration, and dynamic range of heterodyne telescope instruments. The availability of a new, cutting edge single-dish (sub)millimeter facility at a dry, high-altitude site will help to fill this gap, allowing us to address important outstanding questions in planetary and cometary science as outlined in this article.

## The need for a larger aperture, multi-beam, single dish (sub)millimeter facility

**1. Improved sensitivity and dynamic range for molecular detections.** The spectral and imaging dynamic range limitations of currently-leading facilities such as ALMA hinder our ability to detect and map new chemical species in planetary atmospheres. ALMA's nominal spectroscopic dynamic range (the ratio of strongest to weakest signals in the spectrum — typically expressed as the line-to-continuum intensity ratio), is ~1000 at 1.3 mm, but falls to 150–400 at shorter wavelengths (~0.7 mm) using standard calibration procedures. Such limitations make it difficult to reliably measure weak spectral lines and detect new molecules in the (sub)millimeter range. This is a particular problem for planetary targets that have a relatively bright (sub-)mm continuum. The maximum achievable dynamic range is dictated by the ability to accurately calibrate (or flatten) the spectroscopic baseline, which, for interferometers like ALMA, requires the observation of a point-like calibration source with a strong, line-free continuum. Improved calibration accuracy of a single-dish ('total power') facility such as AtLAST could be achieved through observations of brighter, more extended, spectrally featureless solar system objects (such as the Moon or Mercury). This would enable more precise calibration of the intrinsic receiver bandpass.

Advances in instrument design and optics since the construction of present-generation (sub)millimeter facilities such as the IRAM 30-m and JCMT will further facilitate the acquisition of spectra at high dynamic range, allowing the detection of new, spatially distributed trace gases in planetary atmospheres, such as complex organic molecules and other (perhaps biologically relevant) species. For optimal science return on AtLAST, a spectroscopic dynamic range ~10⁵ across large bandwidths should be the goal (see Science Case ii). To realize this objective, close attention should be paid to achieving the flattest possible spectral bandpass, through careful choice of optical design, receiver components, and optimal calibration strategies. To this end, it will also be important to mitigate internal reflections and standing waves between the telescope components as much as possible.

Cometary comae are highly diffuse and extended objects. Their molecular excitation is mostly governed by a combination
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Angular diameters of major Solar System bodies and Saturn's largest moon, Titan. The vertical extents of the coloured bars for each body represent their range of angular sizes due to differing geocentric distances throughout the year. The second y-axis shows the angular resolution a 50 m single dish facility would achieve for a range of representative frequencies.</figcaption></figure>

of thermal and fluorescent processes, leading to rotational emission lines with peak intensities in the (sub)millimeter band. Nevertheless, molecular column densities remain low, so that detection of new molecules and mapping of known species can be challenging in all but the brightest comets. Studies of cometary chemical compositions therefore benefit in proportion to the available spectral line sensitivity; ideally, AtLAST would provide a factor of at least a few improvement compared with existing facilities. This can be achieved through a combination of ~2x smaller beam size for a given frequency (focusing in on the denser, inner-coma), combined with lower receiver temperatures, and reduced sky opacities compared with the IRAM 30-m, which is the current state-of-the art instrument for total power mm-wave spectroscopy of comets. Our goal sensitivity for new spectroscopic detections of cometary molecules with AtLAST should be ~1 mK (per km s⁻¹ of bandwidth) in ≤ 8 h observing time (see Science Case iv).

**2. High spatial resolution.** The relatively low spatial resolution of current single-dish (sub)millimeter facilities has limited the potential for mapping of planetary atmospheres and surfaces. The angular diameters of the major planets (and Titan) are shown in Figure 1, demonstrating the spread in their apparent sizes over time due to orbital motions. For comparison, the diffraction-limited angular resolution (primary beam FWHM)

for a 50 m diameter antenna at a variety of frequencies is also shown. The maximum number of resolution elements within the area of the major Solar System bodies as a function of these frequencies (and wavelengths) are given in Table 1. These data demonstrate that a 50-m class single-dish (sub)millimeter telescope can readily resolve Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn —often, throughout their orbits, in a number of frequency ranges — while the Ice Giants (Uranus and Neptune) can be marginally resolved at terahertz frequencies. Titan remains smaller than 1" throughout its year, but is still an important target for total power spectroscopy with AtLAST, since a 50 m single dish would allow high-frequency observations without severe beam dilution (particularly above ~800 GHz).

Large planets such as Jupiter and Saturn are a particular challenge for interferometers like ALMA, NOEMA and SMA as they possess large angular structures that are resolved out at long baselines. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, a large-aperture, single-dish telescope would enable the observation of planetary objects and surface/atmospheric features that span a wider range of spatial scales. Providing planetary observers with a consistent range of angular resolutions at all times, would facilitate studies of temporal phenomena, contemporaneous observations with other facilities, and support for spacecraft measurements. This latter task can prove difficult for interferometers, which tend to have variable configurations
<table><caption>**Table 1. Maximum Number of Beams Per Planet Area for 50 m Diffraction-Limited Aperture.**</caption><thead><tr><th>Wave. (mm)</th><th>Freq. (GHz)</th><th>Ang. Res. (°)</th><th>Mercury</th><th>Venus</th><th>Mars</th><th>Jupiter</th><th>Saturn</th><th>Uranus</th><th>Neptune</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>3.00</td><td>100</td><td>12.4</td><td>9</td><td>239</td><td>38</td><td>139</td><td>22</td><td>1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2.00</td><td>150</td><td>8.2</td><td>14</td><td>359</td><td>57</td><td>208</td><td>33</td><td>2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1.30</td><td>230</td><td>5.4</td><td>21</td><td>551</td><td>88</td><td>319</td><td>51</td><td>2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0.87</td><td>345</td><td>3.6</td><td>32</td><td>826</td><td>131</td><td>478</td><td>76</td><td>4</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>0.64</td><td>465</td><td>2.7</td><td>43</td><td>1113</td><td>177</td><td>644</td><td>103</td><td>5</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>0.43</td><td>690</td><td>1.8</td><td>63</td><td>1652</td><td>263</td><td>956</td><td>153</td><td>7</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>0.34</td><td>875</td><td>1.4</td><td>80</td><td>2095</td><td>333</td><td>1212</td><td>193</td><td>9</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>0.30</td><td>1000</td><td>1.2</td><td>91</td><td>2394</td><td>381</td><td>1385</td><td>221</td><td>11</td><td>3</td></tr></tbody></table>

(and thus, variable angular sensitivities) throughout the observing schedule. Further, a single-dish instrument with focal-plane receiver array at least an arcminute in diameter would permit mapping of both large and small-scale planetary features. This is particularly valuable for moderately well mixed gases that may only vary on global scales.

A small beam size of ≤5" is required to resolve the majority of planets in our Solar System, which is achievable at frequencies >250 GHz for a 50 m facility. Additionally, a small beam would help minimize beam dilution for the small (~0.1"–2" diameter) bodies such as the icy moons of Jupiter, and will be required to ensure Saturn's moon Enceladus can be reliably separated from Saturn's bright continuum emission (see Science Case iii).

**3. Instantaneous multi-beam spectral mapping.** AtLAST has the potential to capitalize on recent advances in heterodyne multiplexing and multi-beam receiver technology to produce unprecedented spectro-spatial sub-mm maps of the larger planets, as well as cometary comae, the latter of which often extend over hundreds of arcseconds on the sky. The ability to map in two spatial dimensions the chemical distributions and dynamical motions of Solar System objects at a given instant in time is crucial for properly characterizing short-term phenomena such as planetary impacts and storms, and cometary jets and outbursts. Spatial resolution of a few arcseconds over a field of view up to a few arcminutes, with ~10–30 beams across a single axis (for example, in a square or hexagonal, ~25×25 pixel array), at a spectral resolution ~0.1 km s⁻¹, would allow detailed imaging and Doppler studies of molecular species in planetary and cometary atmospheres to study the combined effects of chemical and dynamical processes in these bodies.

### Science case i: Giant planet atmospheres

The complex, extended atmospheres of the Gas and Ice giant planets provide interesting, yet challenging targets for remote

observations due to (1) small-scale vertical (radial) variations in temperature and composition, (2) the brightness of their continuum emission (particularly in contrast to trace atmospheric species), and (3) their high atmospheric pressures and fast rotation speeds, which can significantly broaden the spectral lines. Millimeter/submillimeter facilities provide powerful probes of the composition, structure, and dynamics of the tropospheres and stratospheres of giant planets through the combination of rotational emission/absorption line measurements, studies of highly pressure-broadened (i.e. >1 GHz wide) pseudo-continuum absorption features, and spatial mapping of brightness temperature variations.

The continuum emission from giant planets is dominated by the temperature structure and deep abundances of H₂, He, NH₃, H₂S, PH₃, CH₄, and other gases, which are difficult properties to observe directly through remote sensing and often require *in situ* measurements through interplanetary probes⁶⁵⁻⁶⁷. With the advancement of larger aperture and interferometric facilities, the spatial variability of the giant planet continuum emission can be mapped to better understand the connection between deeper atmospheric composition and dynamical activity, and will help to contextualize spacecraft observations including those made by Juno and the recently launched JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) mission⁶⁸. The development of a larger-aperture, single-dish telescope (AtLAST) will further help to improve our understanding of gas and ice giant planet atmospheres – and by extension, exoplanets with similar sizes and compositions – in several key areas:

* The spatial and temporal variation of temperature structure throughout the troposphere and stratosphere, which relates to the global and local circulation, dynamics and composition of the atmosphere.

* Variability of atmospheric winds and vertical wind shear on short-term and seasonal timescales, and how that relates to climatological and other forcing mechanisms.
* The composition and distribution of trace species throughout the stratosphere and troposphere.

* The changes in chemical abundances over short and long timescales, and their connection to seasonal and transient events such as storms, aurorae and infall from space (cometary impacts, micrometeorites and dust).

## Dynamics

The dynamical state of planetary atmospheres – often described by their temperature structure and wind fields – allows for the characterization of their atmospheric circulation, energy budget, and seasonal variability. Previous studies at long wavelengths have measured brightness temperature and compositional variations in the giant planets to assess the influence of seasonal changes in insolation, meteorological activity, and transient events (such as impacts) throughout their tropospheres and stratospheres, which complement studies in the optical and infrared. The temperature and circulation of Neptune's troposphere and stratosphere have been studied using the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA), VLA, and ALMA$^{57,63,64,69,70}$ through observations of CO and continuum features.

Similarly, the NH$_3$ and brightness temperature distribution on Jupiter from VLA and ALMA observations has been used to contextualize storm outbreaks and observations with the Juno spacecraft$^{12,71,72}$. Figure 2 shows the comparison of ALMA observations of Jupiter at 1.3 and 3.0 mm to a visible wavelength composite from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), allowing for the comparison of brightness temperatures at multiple pressure levels from various zonal features. At frequencies >700 GHz, a 50 m single-dish facility with large focal plane receiver array will be able to provide comparable latitudinal coverage to ALMA Band 3 observations (Figure 2, right panel) in a single integration. Sensitivity ≤1 K over short integration times (minutes) would allow for the precise determination of brightness temperature variations compared to the bright continuum emission while avoiding longitudinal smearing of localized features due to planetary rotation and winds; higher sensitivity and dynamic range considerations pertain mostly to spectral line surveys, as discussed below.

Wide bandwidth (>a few GHz) settings enable the pressure-broadened rotational transitions (e.g., CO at ~115, 231, 346, 461, 576, 691, 807, and 922 GHz) and pseudo-continuum features (e.g., H$_2$S at ~169, 408, and 736 GHz; PH$_3$ at ~267 GHz; and NH$_3$ at ~572 GHz) to be modeled so the deep temperature and composition can be characterized, which complements observations in the IR down to ~1 bar (e.g., 73). Observing the giant planets multiple times throughout their extensive orbital periods will improve our understanding of the influence of seasonal variability on the circulation and dynamical state of the atmosphere and allow for comparison to seasonal photochemical models$^{74-77}$.

In contrast to the meridional circulation of the atmosphere, which is too slow to readily detect using spectral line shifts, the direct measurement of horizontal zonal atmospheric winds is possible from the Doppler shifts of molecular rotational transitions at high (~0.1 km s$^{-1}$) spectral resolution. Wind speeds of the giant planets have typically been inferred directly from cloud tracking techniques (e.g. through Voyager imaging$^{78}$), which rely on correlation analyses of small-scale features observed over multiple rotations. Zonal wind speeds can also be inferred through infrared measurements of the thermal wind shear$^{79}$. Direct observation of spectral line (e.g., HCN at ~89, 265, 355, and 709 GHz) Doppler shifts are required in order to obtain precise wind speed measurements at altitudes above the clouds, avoiding the problems associated with changes in the shapes of resolved atmospheric features over multiple rotations.

Observations of strong stratospheric rotational transitions of CO and HCN using ALMA has resulted in wind measurements for all giant planets apart from Uranus$^{47,49,50}$. Figure 3 shows examples of winds derived from ALMA observations of Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune compared to cloud tracking and auroral measurements. Measuring planetary wind speeds as a function of latitude and at multiple altitudes requires high spectral and spatial resolution combined with a large field of view, which is enabled by heterodyne and (sub)millimeter instrumentation. While the variability in spatial resolution of the giant planets (Figure 1, Table 1) precludes complete latitudinal coverage for all planets at all frequencies, even hemispheric

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** HST (left) and longitude-smeared ALMA (center, right) observations of Jupiter (reproduced with permission from de Pater et al.$^{12}$). The ALMA observations show data after the subtraction of a limb-darkened disk model, enabling the high contrast (≤ 10 K) differences in brightness temperature between Jupiter's zonal structures to be easily observed.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** (Left) Jupiter zonal wind velocities derived from ALMA observations of HCN at ~1" resolution (color map); ultraviolet auroral emission at the south pole is also shown 50,80 (reproduced with permission from 50). (Center) Zonal wind speeds as a function of latitude in Saturn's stratosphere from Benmahi et al.⁴⁷, compared to winds from Cassini imaging. (Right) Comparison of ALMA wind speed measurements of Neptune from CO and HCN emission lines compared to Voyager cloud tracking measurements (reproduced with permission from 49).</figcaption></figure>

comparisons of Doppler wind measurements over time provide interesting results — see, for example, the abrupt change in Titan's stratospheric jet⁵²,⁸¹. As a single-dish facility would not be confined to time-variable configuration (resolution) constraints, episodic changes in wind speeds and wave propagation can be investigated frequently, and over irregular timescales as needed.

Jupiter and Saturn exhibit large-scale weather events where dramatic changes in the planet's visible appearance are accompanied by energetic changes in cloud color and morphology. On Jupiter, such events periodically take place at low latitudes⁸², in the typically white band known as the Equatorial Zone (±7° latitude), and in the adjacent, darker North and South Equatorial Belts between ±7 – 18° latitude. Each region undergoes changes in its normal cloud color and morphology, exhibiting waves, eddies, and wakes, initially beginning over a small local region and expanding to encompass the whole region for some time before returning back to its nominal state.

These events on Jupiter happen on a timescale of between 2–18 years, with little correlation to adjacent regional activity, season, or orbital position⁸³,⁸⁴. On Saturn, however, the northern hemisphere experiences a large convective storm event approximately every 30 years. The previous 'Great Saturn Storm' in 1990 occurred prior to the advent of the ALMA telescope, spanning ~15° latitude and eventually encircling the whole planet. This event led to significant stratospheric effects that could have been readily characterized in the (sub)millimeter⁴⁵. Additionally, 'Great White Spots' have previously been observed with Herschel⁸⁵. The sizes of these types of spectacular atmospheric events (~2–5") would make them observable by

AtLAST. As extensive meteorological events offer a window into the planets' deeper atmospheres, contemporaneous (sub)millimeter observations (which can probe different altitudes by highly resolving line profiles and measuring multiple rotational transitions), provide complementary information to other facilities (e.g., HST, JWST, the Juno Microwave Radiometer instrument). Since a large, single-dish facility would provide adequate spatial resolution to discern between the ~1–5" zonal regions on the giant planets (see Table 1, Figure 2) over their orbital period, strategic and regular observations by AtLAST would serve as an excellent resource to investigate these spectacular episodic events and provide global context for other ground-based and spacecraft measurements.

## Chemistry

The detection of "non-equilibrium" C, N, O and S-bearing molecular species — such as HCN, CO, and CS — in the upper atmospheres of the giant planets has prompted questions pertaining to their origin and chemical evolution. Chemistry and circulation may result in the production and distribution of trace species in the upper atmosphere, as may the infall of cometary, interplanetary dust, or satellite material, or some combination thereof⁴³,⁴⁴,⁸⁶⁻⁹². While previous observations at millimeter wavelengths have allowed for the investigation of these processes (Figure 4), higher sensitivity measurements are required to more fully characterize the governing sources and sinks of non-equilibrium species in the atmospheres of the giant planets. In addition, long-term observing campaigns allow for the measurement of temporal variability in these species, as well as potential sporadic events (e.g. storm outbreaks; cometary impacts) that may alter the upper atmospheric composition and can be measured
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Figure reproduced with permission from Cavalié *et al.*<sup>89</sup>, showing Herschel/HIFI data of the CO (I = 8 – 7) spectrum on Uranus compared to internal, cometary, and steady external infall source models (left), and the corresponding vertical profiles (right). The comparison of Herschel data to the CO source models allows for the inference of an external source of Uranus's CO.</figcaption></figure>

by ATLAST. To perform these investigations requires wideband ($\gtrsim$ 16 GHz), high-resolution ($\leqslant$1 MHz) spectral imaging, as the spectral transitions from minor atmospheric constituents can manifest as significantly extended (several GHz wide), pressure broadened pseudo-continuum absorption wings around a narrow (~MHz-wide) line core (see e.g., CO on Neptune<sup>69,70</sup>).

Finally, the detection of new, trace chemical species in the atmospheres of the giant planets will inform our understanding of their atmospheric photochemistry, and elucidate connections between the external sources from the surrounding system (e.g. dust, satellite infall) or beyond (e.g. comets, galactic cosmic rays). While ALMA has greatly facilitated the detection of heretofore unknown molecules in the atmosphere of Titan, the background continuum emission from the giant planets presents a challenge to the detection of all but the strongest emission lines (CO, HCN, CS, etc.) in their atmospheres. To further expand the known chemical inventory of molecular species, both predicted and serendipitous, the nominal dynamic range of ATLAST needs to be sufficiently high so that emission lines over 1000 times weaker than the continuum level can be reliably detected against large (~20–30”), bright (several hundred Kelvin) continuum sources. Chemical species of interest include $HC_2N$ (~136, 264, 318, and 672 GHz), $CH_3CN$ (bands at ~129, 221, 312, and 698 GHz), $CH_3CCH$ (bands at ~154, 222, 325, 632 GHz), $C_3H_8$, and other nitriles and hydrocarbons. ATLAST therefore holds the promise of detecting new chemical species on giant planets through advancements in sensitivity and dynamic range, while a large focal plane array ($\gtrsim$ 25 x 25 pixels in size) is required to map their spatial distributions without rotational smearing. Such observations would provide major insights into the origins of non-equilibrium species, through spatial

associations with storms, aurorae or infall phenomena, and would lead to a new understanding of the extent of photochemical processing of gases in giant planetary atmospheres.

In addition, studies of molecular isotopic ratios provide profound insights into the formation and evolution of the giant planets (93 and references therein). The measurement of C-, N-, and O-bearing isotopes on the giant planets enables the determination of the main reservoirs for these species, providing crucial inputs for planet formation models. With a spectroscopic dynamic range $\gtrsim 10^4$, measurement of more accurate isotopic ratios for $^{13}$C, $^{17}$O, $^{18}$O, and $^{15}$N in CO, HCN and other gases will be possible, resulting in improved understanding of how planetary systems form and evolve from the isotopically diverse ice, gas and dust reservoirs in the protosolar accretion disk.

### Science case ii: Terrestrial-type atmospheres

Terrestrial-type planets with thick atmospheres are well suited to molecular spectroscopic studies at (sub)millimeter wavelengths. With atmospheric molecular column densities in the range $2.4\times10^{23}-1.5\times10^{27}$ cm$^{-2}$, and angular diameters ~1–60”, Venus, Mars and Titan present compelling targets for spectroscopic studies using a sensitive (sub)millimeter facility. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, Mars and Venus can be readily resolved using a 50 m (sub)millimeter telescope, allowing spectral mapping of trace atmospheric gases to improve our understanding of their atmospheric physical and chemical processes.

### Venus

Mapping of spectral lines from Venus with strong transitions (such as $SO_2$, SO and CO) can provide insights into the chemistry and dynamics of our sister planet’s atmosphere, much
of which remains to be fully understood. The high spectral resolving power (~10⁶–10⁷) offered by heterodyne spectroscopy results in measurements mostly sensitive to altitudes ≳ 60 km — above the thick Venusian cloud layers—allowing detailed studies of the mesosphere and above. Previous space missions to Venus including Pioneer Venus, Venera, Venus Express, and Akatsuki have allowed us to better understand the sulphur and water cycles and global circulation of the atmosphere⁹⁴,⁹⁵. As described by 96, ground based studies provide a valuable complement to these datasets, thanks to their ability to monitor the behavior of gases as function of time, both in the short term (~hours) and the long term (~years or decades). With respect to space-based data, ground-based observations have the advantage of instantaneous snap-shot imaging over the whole disk of Venus, enabling global atmospheric studies as a function of latitude, longitude, and local time.

The Venus Express and Akatsuki orbiters detected strong, long-term (multi-year) variations in the planet-scale zonal wind speeds and atmospheric SO₂ and CO abundances that remain to be fully understood. In the wake of these space missions, continued ground-based (sub)millimeter monitoring is therefore important to better understand these phenomena, which will help us understand the evolution of Venus's global climate. Spectral-spatial mapping of the entire (~10–60" diameter) Venusian disk at a spectral resolution ~0.1 km s⁻¹ and spatial resolution of ~ a few arcseconds is required to fulfill this science objective.

The complex behaviour of sulphur-bearing molecules is a particularly important topic for further study due to their central role in Venus's climate, their close relationship with other volcanic gases (such as the ubiquitous clouds of sulfuric acid that blanket Venus), and their ability to trace photochemical and dynamical phenomena⁹⁴. The strong temporal and spatial variability of SO and SO₂ abundances at high altitudes remains largely mysterious, so further mapping studies are required to elucidate the sources and sinks of these molecules in the upper atmosphere, and relate them to the lower altitude (volcanic) gases and aerosols. Such temporal studies are difficult using ALMA due to its variable array configuration that resolves out most of Venus's disk for a large part of the year, so rapid, multi-beam total-power mapping is required.

CO plays a key role in the carbon dioxide cycle, which maintains the chemical stability of the primary constituent of Venus' atmosphere. Previous (sub)millimeter studies⁹⁷⁻¹⁰⁰ disagree on the extent of spatial variations in the CO distribution, so additional, temporally resolved mapping studies of this molecule are needed. In particular, future, temporally and spatially resolved, ground-based measurements of the atmospheric composition of Venus will be required to contextualize *in situ* data from upcoming spacecraft missions such as DAVINCI+¹⁰¹, VERITAS¹⁰² and EnVision¹⁰³.

The unparalleled sensitivity of AtLAST would enable searches for new molecules (including sulfur, phosphorous and chlorine-bearing species, as well as organic molecules) that

would help improve our understanding of the chemical processes occurring in the Venusian atmosphere, and their link to the volcanic gases that are thought to be so critical in governing Venus's hot global climate. Due to the bright (several hundred Kelvin) Venus continuum, and the comparative weakness of the mm-wave absorption lines from any yet-to-be-detected molecules (~10 mK), searches for new molecules will place strong demands on the spectroscopic dynamic range (DR) of the instrument (which would ideally reach DR ~ 10⁵ to allow in-depth studies of Venus's trace gas inventory). Close attention will therefore need to be paid to the bandpass calibration accuracy and spectroscopic baseline stability, in order to achieve very flat baselines, to allow us to realise the full potential of such a powerful telescope for planetary science. A precise measurement or upper limit of the phosphine (PH₃) abundance would be just one of the ways in which AtLAST would help revolutionize Venus atmospheric science¹⁰⁴⁻¹⁰⁷.

## Mars

The divergent histories of Earth and Mars contain valuable lessons in our quest to determine the conditions required for the origin and persistence of life on planetary surfaces. Understanding the present-day climate and atmospheric composition of Mars, and how it evolved over the history of the Solar System, is therefore an important objective in the fields of planetary science and astrobiology. Mapping and detection of trace atmospheric gases such as CO and H₂O allows us to constrain photochemical networks and climate models, while measurements of molecular isotopic ratios provide unique insights into the planet's atmospheric loss history⁹⁷,¹⁰⁸. Quantifying the Martian atmospheric circulation/global wind field is another essential objective towards revealing the past climate of Mars.

Detailed studies of the composition and wind field of Mars's upper atmosphere were recently performed using data from the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) spacecraft/orbiter¹⁰⁹. These measurements were obtained in the thermospheric altitude range (~140–240 km), using data acquired over several Martian seasons and spanning a large number of spacecraft orbits. Discrepancies between the observed wind speeds and those predicted by state-of-the-art climate models indicate that the global air circulation on Mars remains to be fully understood¹¹⁰; further studies of these phenomena, including how the thermospheric wind speeds are influenced by those at lower altitudes, are therefore needed. Spatially complete measurements of Mars's 4"–26" disk at high (~0.1 km s⁻¹) spectral resolution are required in order to derive the zonal wind speeds as a function of latitude, similar to those described for the giant planets (Science Case i).

The circulation in the middle atmosphere (40–80 km) is also affected by atmospheric transport and climatic processes in the lower atmosphere (<40 km). Although the lower atmospheric dynamics of Mars have been characterized by previous spacecraft missions (e.g. 111,112), and are reasonably well reproduced by general circulation models (GCMs), the middle atmosphere has been less well studied, so models are
less constrained in this region¹¹³. (Sub)millimeter heterodyne observations are uniquely well suited to probing the Martian middle atmosphere, yielding temperature and wind measurements from spectrally and spatially resolved molecular line profiles¹¹⁴,¹¹⁵. As shown by 113, comparison of ground-based Mars CO mapping observations with GCM predictions (see Figure 5) indicates significant discrepancies in the wind speeds and their spatial structure, and the GCMs often underestimate the temperatures in the middle (20–50 km) atmosphere.

No Mars space mission to-date has included high-resolution heterodyne instrumentation. Mars science would thus benefit from an improved-sensitivity ground-based (sub)millimeter telescope. With an angular resolution of a few arcseconds in the (sub)millimeter range (to cover e.g. the CO J = 3–2, 6–5, 7–6 or 8–7 lines between 300–1000 GHz), combined with a large field of view, AtLAST would perform global monitoring of the middle atmosphere of Mars (over timescales from hours to years), enabling critical benchmarking and subsequent improvement of climate models.

## Titan

Since the end of the Cassini mission, ALMA has risen the forefront of ground-based Titan studies, thanks to its ability to

perform spatial/spectral imaging of a large number of atmospheric gases, measure their (3D) distributions, and detect new species, including molecules of possible astrobiological relevance³⁰⁻³⁴,⁶²,¹¹⁶. This has demonstrated the power of long wavelength astronomy to provide new insights into the chemistry, dynamics, climate, and potential habitability of small icy moons in our Solar System. Although a 50-m class facility such as AtLAST will not spatially resolve Titan (which has an angular diameter ≈ 1", including its extended atmosphere; Table 1), with sufficient collecting area, bandwidth and atmospheric transmission, AtLAST would be able to compete with large (sub)millimeter interferometers such as ALMA and NOEMA in terms of flux sensitivity per beam. Consequently, broadband molecular line surveys with AtLAST would be able to reach unprecedented sensitivity towards objects such as Titan. Broad bandwidths (10's of GHz) have been shown to be crucial for the detection of increasingly complex organic molecules in extraterrestrial environments, due to their large number of individual rotational transitions spread across the cm/(sub)millimeter range²¹,¹¹⁷⁻¹¹⁹. Combining the fluxes from multiple emission lines in a broadband survey (e.g. between 200-300 GHz at sub-mK RMS and 1 km s⁻¹ spectral resolution), would therefore provide sufficient sensitivity to detect new molecules on Titan, including molecules of possible (pre-)biotic relevance, and help improve the accuracy of abundance ratio derivations.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Spectral line map of CO/J = 1–0 absorption towards Mars, obtained using the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer with a beam size ~ 7" (adapted from 113; overlaid on an optical map of the Martian surface from the NASA Solar System Simulator; https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/). Black lines: Observations. Red lines: Line profile expected from GCM predictions. Green lines: Fit of observations with retrieved thermal profiles.</figcaption></figure>
Similarly, AtLAST could enable the detection and characterisation of new isotopologues of known molecules (such as ¹³C, ¹⁵N and deuterium-substituted forms of C, N and H-bearing organics), which have the power to elucidate the long-term physico-chemical evolution of Titan's mysterious atmosphere⁹⁷,¹²⁰,¹²¹.

### Science case iii: Plumes from icy moons

Advances in our knowledge regarding the interior structure of icy moons have demonstrated the likely presence of subsurface oceans throughout the Solar System¹²²,¹²³. Enceladus, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto and Triton are known or suspected ocean worlds. Cryovolcanic activity can launch plumes high into their atmospheres, and their molecular emission could be detected by a sensitive (sub)millimeter instrument. Plumes linking the subsurface with the atmosphere provide a potential means for probing the compositions of subsurface liquid reservoirs, and open up the possibility of remote habitability studies. Sensitive (sub)millimeter single-dish spectroscopy can probe the chemical compositions of the tenuous atmospheres of the icy Jovian satellites Europa, Ganymede and Callisto, the Saturnian satellite Enceladus, and the Neptunian satellite Triton to help determine the surface and/or interior compositions, from which insights into the chemistry and habitability of the subsurface oceans of these moons can be obtained.

Subsurface oceans are primary targets in the search for extraterrestrial life¹²⁴, but in-situ survey missions are extremely costly and difficult. One of the most outstanding results of the Cassini mission to the Saturnian system was the discovery of plumes emanating from the south polar region of Enceladus, believed to originate from a warm, subsurface ocean¹²⁵,¹²⁶. However, Cassini mass spectrometry of the plume was relatively low resolution leading to ambiguity in the detection of molecules with equivalent integer atomic mass (e.g. N₂/C₂H₄ and HCN/C₂H₃¹²⁷). The possibility of chemical reactions and molecular dissociation within the Cassini mass spectrometer chamber is also difficult to quantify or rule out, as is the potential contamination of mass spectra due to Cassini fly-throughs of the Titan atmosphere. Unambiguous spectroscopic followup of the Enceladus plume composition is therefore essential.

Following the end of the Cassini spacecraft mission, ground-based spectroscopic studies present a feasible alternative for studying the composition of the Enceladus plume(s), and complement observations from JWST¹²⁸. However, present observatories suffer from a lack of sufficient sensitivity and/or angular resolution to readily detect the faint, ~1" long plumes. Contamination from the bright, nearby (<25" away) Saturn is also a major issue. Even large interferometers such as ALMA struggle due to the relatively large primary beam size provided by a 12 m sized antenna, which makes it difficult to exclude emission from Saturn and its rings from the field of view, leading to troublesome image artifacts. To avoid Saturn and exclude it from the 2nd and 3rd sidelobes of the primary beam, AtLAST would require a HPBW < 8" at 1.1 mm, and as such requires an aperture diameter >40 m.

As an example of what may be detectable, assuming a plume H₂O production rate of ~10²⁸ s⁻¹, constant outflow velocity of 0.5 km s⁻¹, and rotational temperature of 25 K¹²⁸,¹²⁹, with a jet opening angle of 30° and HCN abundance of 10⁻⁴ (10× less than observed in typical comets¹³⁰), the peak antenna temperature for the HCN *J* = 4 – 3 transition is calculated to be ~25 mK (after convolution with a Gaussian beam of FWHM 3.5"). Combining a small beam size with milli-Kelvin sensitivity, AtLAST would therefore be able to open up the possibility of direct ground-based studies of the Enceladus ocean chemistry.

Specific target lines for this science case include HCN (354 GHz), H₂CO (351 GHz), H₂O (183 GHz), CS (243 GHz), SO₂ (252 GHz), H₂S (369 GHz) and transitions of various salts and complex organic molecules including alcohols, carbon chains, aromatics and amino acids in the range 125–373 GHz. Detections (or useful upper limits) on the abundances of these species in the Enceladus and Europa plumes could thus be obtained. Searches for new molecules in the extended Enceladus torus²³ would also be possible. This would not only provide a crucial followup and validation of the Cassini mass spectrometry studies, but also allow changes in the plume composition as a function of time to be observed.

### Science case iv: Comets

Comets accreted in the Solar System at around the same time as the planets, and are believed to contain pristine (largely unprocessed) material from the protosolar accretion disk and prior interstellar cloud¹³¹. Studies of cometary ices therefore provide unique information on the physical and chemical conditions prevalent during the earliest history of the Solar System. Due to their chemical compositions, rich in water and organic molecules, cometary impacts could also have been important for delivering the ingredients of life to otherwise barren planetary surfaces throughout the Solar System, and may therefore have played a role in initiating prebiotic chemistry¹³². Examining the molecular and isotopic content of comets provide unique insights into the relationship between interstellar and planetary material. Through broadband molecular surveys, we gain insights into the diversity of cometary compositions, improving our knowledge of the chemistry that occurred during planetary system formation.

Based on prior experience with the CSO 10-m and IRAM 30-m telescopes²²,¹³³,¹³⁴, detections of new molecular species (previously undetected in comets), including complex organic molecules relevant to the origin of life, can be expected using a next-generation, single-dish (sub)millimeter facility. Observations of deuterated and ¹⁵N/¹³C-substituted isotopologues of known molecules in a statistical sample of comets will provide fundamental new insights into the chemical origins of cometary (and thus, planetary) material.

Spatial-spectral coma studies (see Figure 6) will provide fundamental information on the physics of cometary outgassing, as well as the complex thermal and photochemical processes
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Contour maps of molecular line emission from in comets S1/ISON and F6/Lemmon using ALMA with a beam size of ~ 0.5". Contour intervals in each map are 20% of the peak flux (the lowest, 20% contour has been omitted from panel (c) for clarity). On panel (b), white dashed arrows indicate HNC streams/jets. The peak position of the simultaneously observed) 0.9 mm continuum is indicated with a white '+'. See 24 for further details. Multi-beam mapping studies with AtLAST would dramatically improve our knowledge of cometary compositions and gas production processes on larger coma scales (up to several arcminutes).</figcaption></figure>

occurring in the coma. Using currently available telescopes, these crucial measurements can only be obtained in the very brightest comets (of which only a few appear every 10 years), so a more powerful (sub)millimeter facility (optimized for fast mapping) will significantly expand our knowledge and generate reliable statistics for the (chemically diverse) comet population.

Specific target lines include HCN (354 GHz), DCN (362 GHz), HCN$^{15}$N (344 GHz), H$_2$CO (351 GHz), HDCO (335 GHz), D$_2$CO (342 GHz), H$_2$O (183 GHz), HDO (465 GHz, 894 GHz), D$_2$O (607 GHz, 898 GHz) and transitions of various complex organic molecules including alcohols, carbon chains, aromatics and amino acids in the range 125-373 GHz (see Figure 7 for a selection of the available lines from known cometary species in the millimeter waveband).

Isotopic studies provide a powerful means for understanding the evolution, origins and inter-relationships between different Solar System bodies. In particular, materials throughout the Solar System exhibit differing degrees of deuterium (heavy hydrogen) enrichment, the measurement of which can reveal their chemical and thermal histories. Comets are thought to contain a significant amount of pristine, deuterium-enriched interstellar material, predating the birth of the Solar System$^{135}$. However, D-enrichment in water ice may also be possible due to fractionation reactions in the protosolar accretion disk, before the gas dissipates$^{93}$. The fraction of pristine (interstellar) vs. reprocessed (disk) ices incorporated into planetary materials is an important open question that can be addressed via improved measurements of cometary D/H ratios. In particular, comparison of cometary D/H ratios with protoplanetary disk models can help unravel the details of where, and from which materials cometary ices were accreted$^{136-138}$. As shown in Figure 8, the strongest cometary HDO line accessible

using ground-based sub-mm telescopes is the 1$_{1,1}$ – 0$_{0,0}$ line at 894 GHz. The next strongest lines at 509 and 600 GHz are on the flanks of the high-opacity 557 GHz H$_2$O line, making them undesirable targets, so the 465 GHz line presents the next best alternative after the 894 GHz line. A simulated HDO 894 GHz flux map (and spectral line profile) for a typical comet (assuming HPBW = 1.4") is shown in the right panel of Figure 8. Access to this line would provide an unprecedented opportunity to survey HDO in a large number of comets (several per year), spanning different levels (and modes) of outgassing activity, which would provide new insights into the origin of water on Earth, and elsewhere in the Solar System$^{23,93,137,139}$.

Due to their spatially extended nature (up to several hundred arcseconds), and ~1/r brightness profile, optimal sensitivity to weak cometary lines is achieved using a large, single-aperture antenna rather than an interferometer, since the latter is blind to coma structures larger than the angular scale probed by the shortest baselines. To expand the statistics for cometary abundance measurements in a meaningful way (observing 2 moderately bright comets per year over a 10-year timespan), with sensitivity to all the species in Figure 6, will require milli-Kelvin sensitivity across ~1 km s$^{-1}$ spectral line width. Since comets are dynamic, time-variable objects (on timescales of days or even hours), simultaneous observation of the species of interest is desirable for reliable molecular abundance comparisons. An instantaneous bandwidth of several 10's of GHz is therefore required, at a spectral resolution ~0.1 km s$^{-1}$ in order to resolve the complex kinematical structure of the coma (e.g. 140). Simultaneous, multi-chroic observations in several frequency bands are required to probe the complete range of species of interest. The ability to rapidly respond to transient cometary phenomena such as outbursts or surprise apparitions will necessitate flexible telescope scheduling,
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Broadband spectral model of a comet at 1 au from the Sun and Earth observed using a 50 m diameter telescope in the 1 mm band. We assume a typical cometary gas production rate of $Q(H_2O) = 10^{29} s^{-1}$, spherically symmetric outflow velocity of 0.8 km s$^{-1}$ and rotational temperature of 60 K. Molecular abundances are the average of previously observed cometary values$^{1,30,141}$.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Left: Simulated HDO line strengths in a typical (moderately bright; $Q(H_2O) = 10^{29} s^{-1}$) comet at 1 au from the Earth and Sun, with average cometary HDO/H$_2$O ratio$^{142}$, using a diffraction-limited 50 m telescope beam size. The strongest HDO line in AtLAST's frequency range is highlighted, which is much stronger than the cometary HDO lines observed previously in the (sub)millimeter band. Right: Simulated HDO 894 GHz map and spectral extract from the central pixel. The 1.4" AtLAST beam FWHM is shown lower left.</figcaption></figure>

for example, with a turnaround time of a few days between identification of the target phenomenon and acquisition of the observations. It will also be important to accommodate time-constrained observing requests (ideally, to an accuracy of up to a few minutes), to perform synergistic observations with ground or space-based observatories at other wavelengths, or to capture specific, temporally isolated events such as rapid perihelion/perigee passages or spacecraft flybys.

In terms of frequency coverage, sensitive access to the (sub)millimeter range is required, ideally up to and including the HDO 1,1 - 0,0 line at 894 GHz line.

## Conclusion

We have highlighted some the most important planetary science use cases for a new, large-aperture, single-dish submillimeter

telescope. In particular, the improvements in spectral line sensitivity and dynamic range offered by such a cutting-edge facility will permit the detection of new molecules and isotopologues that will directly enhance our understanding of chemical complexity and abundances in the upper atmospheres of the terrestrial and giant planets, as well as in comets. In turn, these observations will improve our understanding of exoplanetary atmospheric dynamics and compositions, and allow for the improved assessment of planets and moons within our solar system to harbor past or present habitable environments. Instantaneous (snapshot), high resolution, broadband spectral-spatial molecular mapping will provide new insights into transient phenomena such as planetary winds and storms, as well as jets, outbursts and ambient molecular distributions in cometary comae and icy moon exospheres. The relevant instrument specifications required to achieve this science are summarized below.
# Summary of instrument requirements

## Sensitivity

RMS sensitivities of ~1 mK per 1 km s⁻¹ spectral resolution element in a few hours on-source will be required for spectroscopic characterization of Solar System bodies (which are often time-variable). This will allow spectral mapping of known trace species, isotopic measurements, and new molecular detections in planetary atmospheres and comets.

## Spectroscopic dynamic range

Spectroscopic dynamic range (ratio of continuum to line intensity) ≥10⁵ is required for detection of weak atmospheric spectral lines from trace gases, against the bright continuum of Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Titan.

## Spectral coverage and resolution

(Sub)millimeter spectroscopic observations of planetary and cometary atmospheres require a combination of broad bandwidth (several GHz or more to properly characterize the profiles of strongly pressure-broadened rotational lines) and high spectral resolution (~100 kHz to fully resolve thermally-broadened line profiles ~1 km s⁻¹ wide). Broad (10's of GHz) of bandwidth in the (sub)millimeter range — preferably, simultaneously across multiple receiver bands — is also necessary to observe multiple molecules and rotational transitions simultaneously, and would enable spectral line stacking analyses for more complex molecules whose lines are often distributed over a large frequency range. This will lead to orders-of-magnitude improvements in sensitivity for the more complex molecules, which can have hundreds of lines within the spectral range of interest. Instantaneous bandwidth of 32–64 GHz would be desirable to avoid having to change receiver tunings during time-critical observations, facilitating relative abundance and isotopic ratio analyses.

## Spatial resolution

A small beam size of ~5" at 300 GHz is required for the majority of planets in our Solar System to be spatially resolved (see Table 1), paving the way toward more detailed atmospheric studies than have previously been possible with single-dish facilities. Such a small beam is also required to minimize beam dilution for the small (~0.1"–2" diameter) bodies such as icy moons and their plumes/exospheres. A small primary beam (≤ 8") is also strictly required for Enceladus observations, to avoid contamination due to its close proximity (< 25") from the bright emission sources of Saturn and its rings.

## Mapping requirements

Spatial resolution of a few arcseconds over a field of view up to a few arcminutes, with ~20–50 beams across a single axis (for example, in a square or hexagonal array, ~25 pixels in across) is required for snapshot mapping of terrestrial and gas-giant planetary atmospheres. A 50-m single-dish telescope with large focal plane array could achieve this without resolving out the larger planets, which is a problem for interferometers.

## Time-domain considerations

Observations of Solar System objects are often time-critical, in the case of observing transient atmospheric phenomena, cometary outbursts etc., and to account for moons being in and out of eclipse/occultation, or to avoid observing when a satellite is too close to its parent planet. Target-of-opportunity observations, coordination with other telescopes/space missions, and accommodation for regular monitoring of science targets with a predefined cadence (over a timescale of days, weeks, months or years), will all be crucial for maximum science return on time-variable Solar System objects. Scheduling the most critical observations to within an accuracy of a few minutes will therefore be desirable. Responding to unexpected transient phenomena such as cometary outbursts or surprise apparitions will necessitate flexible telescope scheduling, for example, with a turnaround time of a few days.

## Consent

Ethical approval and consent were not required.

## Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

## Software availability

The calculations used to derive integration times for this paper were done using the AtLAST sensitivity calculator, a deliverable of Horizon 2020 research project ‘Towards AtLAST’, and available from this link. Spectral line intensities for Enceladus and comets were calculated using the LIME and SUBLIME radiative transfer codes, respectively¹⁴³,¹⁴⁴, both of which are available on GitHub.

# References

1. Klaassen PD, Mroczkowski TK, Cicone C, et al.: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) conference series. 2020; 11445: 114452F.

2. Mroczkowski T, Cicone C, Reichert M, et al.: Progress in the design of the atacama large aperture submillimeter telescope. 2023 XXXVth General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS). 2023; 174. Publisher Full Text

3. Mroczkowski T, Gallardo PA, Timpe M, et al.: Design of the 50-meter Atacama Large Aperture Submm Telescope. arXiv e-prints. arXiv: 2402.18645, 2024. Publisher Full Text

4. Ramasawmy J, Klaassen PD, Cicone C, et al.: The Atacama Large Aperture Submillimetre Telescope: key science drivers. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 2022; 12190: 1219007. Publisher Full Text
5. Zhu W, Dong S: Exoplanet statistics and theoretical implications. *Annu Rev Astron Astrophys.* 2021; **59**: 291–336.

Publisher Full Text

6. Altenhoff WJ, Chini R, Hein H, et al.: First radio astronomical estimate of the temperature of Pluto. A&A. 1988; **190**(2): L15-L17.

Reference Source

7. de Kleer K, Butler B, de Pater I, et al.: Ganymede's surface properties from millimeter and infrared thermal emission. *Planet Sci J.* 2021; **2**: 5.

Publisher Full Text

8. de Kleer K, Cambioni S, Shepard M: The surface of (16) psyche from thermal emission and polarization mapping. *Planet Sci J.* 2021; **2**(4): 149.

Publisher Full Text

9. de Pater I, Dickel JR: VLA observations of Saturn at 1.3, 2, and 6 cm. *Icarus*. 1982; **50**(1): 88–102.

Publisher Full Text

10. de Pater I, Jaffe WJ: Very large array observations of Jupiter's nonthermal radiation. *ApJ*. 1984; **54**: 405–419.

Publisher Full Text

11. de Pater I, Keane JT, de Kleer K, et al.: A 2020 observational perspective of IO. *Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc.* 2021; **49**: 30.

Publisher Full Text

12. de Pater I, Sault RJ, Moeckel C, et al.: First ALMA millimeter-wavelength maps of Jupiter, with a multiwavelength study of convection. *Astron J.* 2019; **158**(4): 139.

Publisher Full Text

13. Gurwell MA: Submillimeter observations of Titan: global measures of stratospheric temperature, CO, HCN, HCN, and the isotopic ratios ¹²C/¹³C and ¹⁴N/¹⁵N. *ApJ*. 2004; **616**: L7.

Publisher Full Text

14. Lellouch E, Romani PN, Rosenqvist J: The vertical distribution and origin of HCN in Neptune's atmosphere. *Icarus*. 1994; **108**(1): 112–136.

Publisher Full Text

15. Marten A, Hidayat T, Biraud Y, et al.: New millimeter heterodyne observations of Titan: vertical distributions of nitriles HCN, HCN, CH₃CN, and the isotopic ratio ¹⁵N/¹⁴N in its atmosphere. *Icarus*. 2002; **158**(2): 532–544.

Publisher Full Text

16. Moreno R, Marten A, Hidayat T: Interferometric measurements of zonal winds on Titan. A&A. 2005; **437**(1): 319–328.

Publisher Full Text

17. Muhleman DO, Berge GL, Rudy D, et al.: Precise VLA positions and flux-density measurements of the Jupiter system. *AJ*. 1986; **92**: 1428–1435.

Publisher Full Text

18. Wong MH, de Pater I, Heiles C, et al.: Observations of jupiter's 20-cm synchrotron emission during the impacts of comet P/Shoemaker-Levy-9. *Icarus*. 1996; **121**(2): 457–468.

Publisher Full Text

19. Bockelee-Morvan D, Crovisier J, Colom P, et al.: A&A. 1994; **287**: 647.

20. Huebner WF, Snyder LE, Buhl D: HCN radio emission from comet Kohoutek (1973f). *Icarus*. 1974; **23**(4): 580–584.

Publisher Full Text

21. Biver N, Bockelée-Morvan D, Moreno R, et al.: Ethyl alcohol and sugar in comet C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy). *Sci Adv.* 2015; **1**(9): e1500863.

PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

22. Biver N, Moreno R, Bockelée-Morvan D, et al.: Isotopic ratios of H, C, N, O, and S in comets C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) and C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy). A&A. 2016; **589**: A78.

Publisher Full Text

23. Hartogh P, Lis DC, Bockelée-Morvan D, et al.: Ocean-like water in the Jupiter-family comet 103P/Hartley 2. *Nature*. 2011; **478**: 218–20.

PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

24. Cordiner MA, Remijan AJ, Boissier J, et al.: Mapping the release of volatiles in the inner comae of comets C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) and C/2012 S1 (ISON) using the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array. *ApJL*. 2014; **792**: L2.

Publisher Full Text

25. Cordiner MA, Boissier J, Charnley SB, et al.: ALMA mapping of rapid gas and dust variations in comet C/2012 S1 (ISON): new insights into the origin of cometary HNC. *ApJ*. 2017; **838**(2): 147.

Publisher Full Text

26. Cordiner MA, Roth NX, Milam SN, et al.: Gas sources from the coma and nucleus of comet 46P/Wirtanen observed using ALMA. *ApJ*. 2023; **953**: 59.

Publisher Full Text

27. Marten A, Gautier D, Owen T, et al.: First observations of CO and HCN on Neptune and Uranus at millimeter wavelengths and their implications for atmospheric chemistry. *ApJ*. 1993; **406**: 285.

Publisher Full Text

28. Lellouch E, Gurwell M, Butler B, et al.: Detection of CO and HCN in Pluto's atmosphere with ALMA. *Icarus*. 2017; **286**: 289–307.

Publisher Full Text

29. Bézard B, Marten A, Paubert G: Detection of acetonitrile on Titan. AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. 1993; **25**: 1100.

Reference Source

30. Cordiner MA, Teanby NA, Nixon CA, et al.: ALMA spectral imaging of Titan contemporaneous with cassini's grand finale. *AJ*. 2019; **158**(2): 76.

Publisher Full Text

31. Cordiner MA, Palmer MY, Nixon CA, et al.: Ethyl cyanide on Titan: spectroscopic detection and mapping using ALMA. *ApJL*. 2015; **800**(1): L14.

Publisher Full Text

32. Nixon CA, Thelen AE, Cordiner MA, et al.: Detection of cyclopropenylidene on Titan with ALMA. *AJ*. 2020; **160**(5): 205.

Publisher Full Text

33. Palmer MY, Cordiner MA, Nixon CA, et al.: ALMA detection and astrobiological potential of vinyl cyanide on Titan. *Sci Adv.* 2017; **3**(7): e1700022.

PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

34. Thelen AE, Cordiner MA, Nixon CA, et al.: Detection of CH₃C₃N in Titan's atmosphere. *ApJL*. 2020; **903**(1): L22.

Publisher Full Text

35. Cavalié T, Venot O, Selsis F, et al.: Thermochemistry and vertical mixing in the tropospheres of Uranus and Neptune: how convection inhibition can affect the derivation of deep oxygen abundances. *Icarus*. 2017; **291**: 1–16.

Publisher Full Text

36. Lellouch E, Moreno R, Paubert G: A dual origin for Neptune's carbon monoxide? A&A. 2005; **430**(2): L37–L40.

Publisher Full Text

37. Lodders K, Fegley BJ: The origin of carbon monoxide in Neptune's atmosphere. *Icarus*. 1994; **112**(2): 368–375.

Publisher Full Text

38. Moreno R, Lellouch E, Cavalié T, et al.: Detection of CS in Neptune's atmosphere from ALMA observations. A&A. 2017; **608**: L5.

Publisher Full Text

39. Teanby NA, Irwin PGJ, Moses JI, et al.: Neptune and Uranus: ice or rock giants? *Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci.* 2020; **378**(2187): 20190489.

PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

40. Feuchtgruber H, Lellouch E, Orton G, et al.: The D/H ratio in the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune from Herschel-PACS observations. A&A. 2013; **551**: A126.

Publisher Full Text

41. Hartogh P, Lellouch E, Moreno R, et al.: Direct detection of the Enceladus water torus with Herschel. A&A. 2011; **532**: L2.

Publisher Full Text

42. Moreno R, Lellouch E, Lara LM, et al.: First detection of hydrogen isocyanide (HNC) in Titan's atmosphere. A&A. 2011; **536**: L12.

Publisher Full Text

43. Cavalié T, Feuchtgruber H, Lellouch E, et al.: Spatial distribution of water in the stratosphere of Jupiter from Herschel/HIFI and PACS observations. A&A. 2013; **553**: A21.

Publisher Full Text

44. Teanby NA, Irwin PGJ, Sylvestre M, et al.: Uranus's and Neptune's stratospheric water abundance and vertical profile from Herschel-HIFI. *Planet Sci J.* 2022; **3**(4): 96.

Publisher Full Text

45. Fletcher LN, Swinyard B, Salji C, et al.: Sub-millimetre spectroscopy of Saturn's trace gases from Herschel/SPIRE. A&A. 2012; **539**: A44.

Publisher Full Text

46. Benmahi B, Cavalié T, Greathouse TK, et al.: Mapping the zonal winds of Jupiter's stratospheric equatorial oscillation. A&A. 2021; **652**: A125.

Publisher Full Text

47. Benmahi B, Cavalié T, Fouchet T, et al.: First absolute wind measurements in Saturn's stratosphere from ALMA observations. A&A. 2022; **666**: A117.

Publisher Full Text

48. Camarca M, de Kleer K, Butler B, et al.: Thermal properties of the leading hemisphere of callisto inferred from ALMA Observations. *Planet Sci J.* 2023; **4**(8): 142.

Publisher Full Text

49. Carrión-González Ó, Moreno R, Lellouch E, et al.: Doppler wind measurements in Neptune's stratosphere with ALMA. A&A. 2023; **674**: L3.

Publisher Full Text

50. Cavalié T, Benmahi B, Hue V, et al.: First direct measurement of auroral and equatorial jets in the stratosphere of Jupiter. A&A. 2021; **647**: L8.

Publisher Full Text

51. Cavalié T, Rezac L, Moreno R, et al.: Evidence for auroral influence on Jupiter's nitrogen and oxygen chemistry revealed by ALMA. *Nature Astronomy.* 2023; **7**: 1048–1055.

Publisher Full Text

52. Cordiner MA, Garcia-Berrios E, Cosentino RG, et al.: Detection of dynamical instability in Titan's thermospheric jet. *ApJL*. 2020; **904**(1): L12.

Publisher Full Text

53. Cordiner MA, Nixon CA, Charnley SB, et al.: Interferometric imaging of Titan's HCN, H¹CCCN, and HCCC¹⁵N. *ApJ*. 2018; **859**(1): L15.

Publisher Full Text

54. Cordiner MA, Teanby NA, Nixon CA, et al.: ALMA spectral imaging of Titan contemporaneous with cassini's grand finale. *AJ*. 2019; **158**(2): 76.

Publisher Full Text

55. Cordiner MA, Nixon CA, Teanby NA, et al.: ALMA measurements of the HNC
and HCN distributions in Titan's atmosphere. *ApJL*. 2014; **795**: L30.
**Publisher Full Text**

56. Cordiner MA, Palmer MY, Nixon CA, et al.: Ethyl cyanide on Titan: spectroscopic detection and mapping using ALMA. *ApJL*. 2015; **800**(1): L14.
**Publisher Full Text**

57. Iino T, Yamada T: Spatially resolved sub-millimeter continuum imaging of Neptune with ALMA. *AJ*. 2018; **155**(2): 92.
**Publisher Full Text**

58. Thelen AE, de Kleer K, Camarca M, et al.: Subsurface thermophysical properties of Europa's leading and trailing hemispheres as revealed by ALMA. *Planet Sci J*. 2024; **5**(2): 56.
**Publisher Full Text**

59. Thelen AE, Nixon CA, Cosentino RG, et al.: Variability in Titan's mesospheric HCN and temperature structure as observed by ALMA. *Planet Sci J*. 2022; **3**(6): 146.
**Publisher Full Text**

60. Thelen AE, Nixon CA, Cordiner MA, et al.: Measurement of CHD on Titan at submillimeter wavelengths. *Astron J*. 2019; **157**(6): 219.
**Publisher Full Text**

61. Thelen AE, Nixon CA, Chanover NJ, et al.: Spatial variations in Titan's atmospheric temperature: ALMA and Cassini comparisons from 2012 to 2015. *Icarus*. 2018; **307**: 380-390.
**Publisher Full Text**

62. Thelen AE, Nixon CA, Chanover NJ, et al.: Abundance measurements of Titan's stratospheric HCN, HCN, N, C, H, and CH CN from ALMA observations. *Icarus*. 2019; **319**: 417-432.
**Publisher Full Text**

63. Tollefson J, de Pater I, Luszcz-Cook S, et al.: Neptune's latitudinal variations as viewed with ALMA. *AJ*. 2019; **157**(6): 251.
**Publisher Full Text**

64. Tollefson J, de Pater I, Molter EM, et al.: Neptune's spatial brightness temperature variations from the VLA and ALMA. *Planet Sci J*. 2021; **2**(3): 105.
**Publisher Full Text**

65. Mousis O, Fletcher LN, Lebreton JP, et al.: Scientific rationale for Saturn's *in situ* exploration. *Planet Space Sci*. 2014; **104**: 29-47.
**Publisher Full Text**

66. Mousis O, Atkinson DH, Cavalié T, et al.: Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune *in situ* explorations. *Planet Space Sci*. 2018; **155**: 12-40.
**Publisher Full Text**

67. Wong MH, Mahaffy PR, Atreya SK, et al.: Updated galileo probe mass spectrometer measurements of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur on Jupiter. *Icarus*. 2004; **171**(1): 153-170.
**Publisher Full Text**

68. Fletcher LN, Cavalié T, Grassi D, et al.: Jupiter science enabled by ESA's Jupiter Icy moons explorer. *Space Sci Rev*. 2023; **219**: 53.
**Publisher Full Text**

69. Luszcz-Cook SH, de Pater I: Constraining the origins of Neptune's carbon monoxide abundance with CARMA millimeter-wave observations. *Icarus*. 2013; **222**(1): 379-400.
**Publisher Full Text**

70. Luszcz-Cook SH, de Pater I, Wright M: Spatially-resolved millimeter-wavelength maps of neptune. *Icarus*. 2013; **226**(1): 437-454.
**Publisher Full Text**

71. de Pater I, Sault RJ, Wong MH, et al.: Jupiter's ammonia distribution derived from VLA maps at 3-37 GHz. *Icarus*. 2019; **322**: 168-191.
**Publisher Full Text**

72. Moeckel C, de Pater I, DeBoer D: Ammonia abundance derived from juno MWR and VLA observations of Jupiter. *Planet Sci J*. 2023; **4**: 25.
**Publisher Full Text**

73. Fletcher LN, Orton GS, Greathouse TK, et al.: Jupiter's equatorial plumes and hot spots: spectral mapping from gemini/TEXES and juno/MWR. *J Geophys Res (Planets)*. 2020; **125**(8): e06399.
**Publisher Full Text**

74. Hue V, Greathouse TK, Cavalié T, et al.: 2D photochemical modeling of Saturn's stratosphere. part II: feedback between composition and temperature. *Icarus*. 2016; **267**: 334-343.
**Publisher Full Text**

75. Hue V, Hersant F, Cavalié T, et al.: Photochemistry, mixing and transport in Jupiter's stratosphere constrained by Cassini. *Icarus*. 2018; **307**: 106-123.
**Publisher Full Text**

76. Moses JI, Cavalié T, Fletcher LN, et al.: Atmospheric chemistry on Uranus and Neptune. *Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci*. 2020; **378**(2187): 20190477.
**PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text**

77. Moses JI, Fouchet T, Bézard B, et al.: Photochemistry and diffusion in Jupiter's stratosphere: constraints from ISO observations and comparisons with other giant planets. *J Geophys Res (Planets)*. 2005; **110**(8): E08001.
**Publisher Full Text**

78. Limaye SS, Sromovsky LA: Winds of Neptune: Voyager observations of cloud motions. *J Geophys Res*. 1991; **96**(S01): 18941-18960.
**Publisher Full Text**

79. Fletcher LN, Helled R, Roussos E, et al.: Ice giant systems: the scientific potential of orbital missions to Uranus and Neptune. *Planet Space Sci*. 2020; **191**: 105030.
**Publisher Full Text**

80. Clarke JT, Nichols J, Gérard JC, et al.: Response of Jupiter's and Saturn's auroral activity to the solar wind. *Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics)*. 2009; **114**(A5): A05210.
**Publisher Full Text**

81. Lellouch E, Gurwell MA, Moreno R, et al.: An intense thermospheric jet on Titan. *Nat Astron*. 2019; **3**: 614-619.
**Publisher Full Text**

82. Fletcher LN: Cycles of activity in the Jovian atmosphere. *Geophys Res Lett*. 2017; **44**(10): 4725-4729.
**Publisher Full Text**

83. Antuñano A, Fletcher LN, Orton GS, et al.: Infrared characterization of Jupiter's equatorial disturbance cycle. *Geophys Res Lett*. 2018; **45**(20): 10,987-10,995.
**Publisher Full Text**

84. Antuñano A, Fletcher LN, Orton GS, et al.: Jupiter's multi-year cycles of temperature and aerosol variability from ground-based mid-infrared imaging. *J Geophys Res (Planets)*. 2023; **128**(12): e2022J E007693.
**Publisher Full Text**

85. Cavalie T, Feuchtgruber H, Hesman B, et al.: In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. #44, 403.07. 2012.

86. Cavalié T, Lellouch E, Biver N, et al.: In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. #38, 11.14. 2006.

87. Cavalié T, Hartogh P, Billebaud F, et al.: A cometary origin for CO in the stratosphere of Saturn? A&A. 2010; **510**: A88.
**Publisher Full Text**

88. Cavalié T, Biver N, Hartogh P, et al.: Odin space telescope monitoring of water vapor in the stratosphere of Jupiter. *Planet Space Sci*. 2012; **61**(1): 3-14.
**Publisher Full Text**

89. Cavalié T, Moreno R, Lellouch E, et al.: The first submillimeter observation of CO in the stratosphere of Uranus. A&A. 2014; **562**: A33.
**Publisher Full Text**

90. Cavalié T, Hue V, Hartogh P, et al.: Herschel map of Saturn's stratospheric water, delivered by the plumes of Enceladus. A&A. 2019; **630**: A87.
**Publisher Full Text**

91. Iino T, Sagawa H, Tsukagoshi T, et al.: A belt-like distribution of gaseous hydrogen cyanide on Neptune's equatorial stratosphere detected by ALMA. *ApJ*. 2020; **903**(1): L1.
**Publisher Full Text**

92. Lellouch E, Hartogh P, Feuchtgruber H, et al.: First results of Herschel-PACS observations of Neptune. A&A. 2010; **518**: L152.
**Publisher Full Text**

93. Nomura H, Furuya K, Cordiner MA, et al.: In: Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. Vol. 534, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 2023; 1075.

94. Marcq E, Mills FP, Parkinson CD, et al.: Composition and chemistry of the neutral atmosphere of Venus *Space Sci Rev*. 2018; **214**: 10.
**Publisher Full Text**

95. Taylor FW, Svedhem H, Head JW: Venus: the atmosphere, climate, surface, interior and near-space environment of an earth-like planet. *Space Sci Rev*. 2018; **214**(1): 35.
**Publisher Full Text**

96. Encrenaz T, Greathouse TK, Marcq E, et al.: HDO and SO₂ thermal mapping on Venus. A&A. 2019; **623**: A70.
**Publisher Full Text**

97. Clancy RT, Muhleman DO: Diurnal CO variations in the Venus mesosphere from CO microwave spectra. *Icarus*. 1985; **64**(2): 157-182.
**Publisher Full Text**

98. Clancy RT, Sandor BJ, Moriarty-Schieven G: Thermal structure and CO distribution for the Venus mesosphere/lower thermosphere: 2001-2009 inferior conjunction sub-millimeter CO absorption line observations. *Icarus*. 2012; **217**(2): 779-793.
**Publisher Full Text**

99. Clancy RT, Sandor BJ, Moriarty-Schieven GH: Venus upper atmospheric CO, temperature, and winds across the afternoon/evening terminator from June 2007 JCMT sub-millimeter line observations. *Planet Space Sci*. 2008; **56**(10): 1344-1354.
**Publisher Full Text**

100. Encrenaz T, Moreno R, Moullet A, et al.: Submillimeter mapping of mesospheric minor species on Venus with ALMA. *Planet Space Sci*. 2015; **113-114**: 275-291.
**Publisher Full Text**

101. Garvin JB, Getty SA, Arney GN, et al.: Revealing the mysteries of Venus: the DAVINCI mission. *PSJ*. 2022; **3**: 117.
**Publisher Full Text**

102. Cascioli G, Hensley S, De Marchi F, et al.: The determination of the rotational state and interior structure of Venus with VERITAS. *PSJ*. 2021; **2**(6): 220.
**Publisher Full Text**

103. Ghail RC, Wilson C, Gland M, et al.: EnVision: taking the pulse of our twin planet. *Exp Astron*. 2012; **33**: 337-363.
**Publisher Full Text**
104. Bains W, Petkowski JJ, Seager S, et al.: Phosphine on Venus cannot be explained by conventional processes. *Astrobiology*, 2021; **21**(10): 1277-1304.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

105. Cordiner MA, Villanueva GL, Wiesemeyer H, et al.: Phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere: a strict upper limit from SOFIA GREAT observations. *Geophys Res Lett.* 2022; **49**(22): e2022GL101055.
**Publisher Full Text**

106. Greaves JS, Richards AMS, Bains W, et al.: Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus. *Nat Astron.* 2021a; **5**: 655–664.
**Publisher Full Text**

107. Villanueva GL, Cordiner M, Irwin PGJ, et al.: No evidence of phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus from independent analyses. *Nat Astron.* 2021; **5**: 631–635.
**Publisher Full Text**

108. Villanueva GL, Mumma MJ, Novak RE, et al.: Strong water isotopic anomalies in the Martian atmosphere: probing current and ancient reservoirs. *Science*. 2015; **348**(6231): 218-221.
**Publisher Full Text**

109. Benna M, Bougher SW, Lee Y, et al.: Global circulation of Mars' upper atmosphere. *Science*, 2019; **366**(6471): 1363-1366.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

110. Roeten KJ, Bougher SW, Benna M, et al.: MAVEN/NGIMS thermospheric neutral wind observations: interpretation using the M-GITM general circulation model. *J Geophys Res Planets*. 2019; **124**(12): 3283-3303.
**Publisher Full Text**

111. Grassi D, Formisano V, Forget F, et al.: The Martian atmosphere in the region of Hellas basin as observed by the planetary Fourier spectrometer (PFS-MEX). *Planet Space Sci.* 2007; **55**(10): 1346-1357.
**Publisher Full Text**

112. Hinson DP, Wilson RJ: Temperature inversions, thermal tides, and water ice clouds in the Martian tropics. *J Geophys Res Planets*. 2004; **109**(E1): E01002.
**Publisher Full Text**

113. Moreno R, Lellouch E, Forget F, et al.: Wind measurements in Mars' middle atmosphere: IRAM plateau de bure interferometric CO observations. *Icarus*. 2009; **201**(2): 549-563.
**Publisher Full Text**

114. Cavalié T, Billebaud F, Encrenaz T, et al.: Vertical temperature profile and mesospheric winds retrieval on Mars from CO millimeter observations. *Comparison with general circulation model predictions*. A&A, 2008; **489**(2): 795-809.
**Publisher Full Text**

115. Lellouch E, Paubert G, Encrenaz T: Mapping of CO millimeter-wave lines in Mars' atmosphere: the spatial variability of carbon monoxide on Mars. *Planet Space Sci.* 1991; **39**(1-2): 219-224.
**Publisher Full Text**

116. Cordiner MA, Nixon CA, Teanby NA, et al.: ALMA measurements of the HNC and HC<sub>2</sub>N distributions in Titan's atmosphere. *ApJL*. 2014; **795**: L30.
**Publisher Full Text**

117. Cooke IR, Xue C, Changala PB, et al.: Detection of interstellar *E*-1-*cyano*-1,3-butadiene in *GOTHAM* observations of TMC-1. *ApJ*. 2023; **948**(2): 133.
**Publisher Full Text**

118. Loomis RA, Burkhardt AM, Shingledecker CN, et al.: An investigation of spectral line stacking techniques and application to the detection of HC<sub>1</sub>N. *arXiv e-prints*. arXiv: 2009.11900, 2020.
**Publisher Full Text**

119. McGuire BA, Burkhardt AM, Loomis RA, et al.: Early science from *GOTHAM*: project overview, methods, and the detection of interstellar propargyl cyanide (HCCCH<sub>2</sub>CN) in TMC-1. *ApJ*. 2020; **900**(1): L10.
**Publisher Full Text**

120. Mandt KE, Mousis O, Lunine J, et al.: Protosolar ammonia as the unique source of Titan's nitrogen. *ApJ*. 2014; **788**(2): L24.
**Publisher Full Text**

121. Mandt KE, Waite JH, Lewis W, et al.: Isotopic evolution of the major constituents of Titan's atmosphere based on Cassini data. *Planet Space Sci.* 2009; **57**(14-15): 1917-1930.
**Publisher Full Text**

122. Nimmo F, Pappalardo RT: Ocean worlds in the outer solar system. *J Geophys Res (Planets)*. 2016; **121**(8): 1378-1399.
**Publisher Full Text**

123. Shematovich VI: Ocean worlds in the outer regions of the solar system (review). *Solar Syst Res.* 2018; **52**(5): 371-381.
**Publisher Full Text**

124. Hendrix AR, Hurford TA, Barge LM, et al.: The NASA roadmap to ocean worlds. *Astrobiology*. 2019; **19**(1): 1-27.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text** | **Free Full Text**

125. Porco CC, Helfenstein P, Thomas PC, et al.: Cassini observes the active south pole of Enceladus. *Science*. 2006; **311**(5766): 1393-1401.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

126. Spencer JR, Nimmo F, Ingersoll AP, et al.: Plume origins and plumbing: from ocean to surface. ed. P. M. Schenk, R. N. Clark, C. J. A. Howett, A. J. Verbiscer, & J. H. Waite, Space Science Series (University of Arizona Press), 2018; 163-174.
**Reference Source**

127. Waite JHJ, Lewis WS, Magee BA, et al.: Liquid water on Enceladus from observations of ammonia and ⁴⁰Ar in the plume. *Nature*. 2009; **460**(7254): 487-490.
**Publisher Full Text**

128. Villanueva GL, Hammel HB, Milam SN, et al.: JWST molecular mapping and characterization of Enceladus' water plume feeding its torus. *Nat Astron.* 2023; **7**: 1056-1062.
**Publisher Full Text**

129. Waite JH, Combi MR, Ip WH, et al.: Cassini ion and neutral mass spectrometer: Enceladus plume composition and structure. *Science*. 2006; **311**(5766): 1419-1422.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

130. Bockelée-Morvan D, Biver N: The composition of cometary ices. *Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci.* 2017; **375**(2097): 20160252.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

131. Mumma MJ, Charnley SB: The chemical composition of comets—emerging taxonomies and natal heritage. *ARA&A*. 2011; **49**: 471–524.
**Publisher Full Text**

132. Chyba C, Sagan C: Endogenous production, exogenous delivery and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: an inventory for the origins of life. *Nature*. 1992; **355**: 125-32.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

133. Biver N, Bockelée-Morvan D, Debout V, et al.: Complex organic molecules in comets C/2012 F6 (Lemmon) and C/2013 R1 (Lovejoy): detection of ethylene glycol and formamide. A&A, 2014; **566**: L5.
**Publisher Full Text**

134. Bockelée-Morvan D, Lis DC, Wink JE, et al.: New molecules found in comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp). Investigating the link between cometary and interstellar material. A&A, 2000; **353**: 1101-1114.
**Reference Source**

135. Altwegg K, Balsiger H, Berthelier JJ, et al.: *D*<sub>2</sub>O and HDS in the coma of 67P/ churyumov-gerasimenko. *Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci.* 2017; **375**(2097): 20160253.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text** | **Free Full Text**

136. Albertsson T, Semenov D, Henning T: Chemodynamical deuterium fractionation in the early solar nebula: the origin of water on earth and in asteroids and comets. *ApJ*. 2014; **784**(1): 39.
**Publisher Full Text**

137. Cleeves LI, Bergin EA, Alexander CMO, et al.: The ancient heritage of water ice in the solar system. *Science*. 2014; **345**(6204): 1590-3.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

138. Willacy K, Woods PM: Deuterium chemistry in protoplanetary disks. II. The inner 30 AU. *ApJ*. 2009; **703**(1): 479.
**Publisher Full Text**

139. Altwegg K, Balsiger H, Bar-Nun A, et al.: Cometary science. 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, a Jupiter family comet with a high D/H ratio. *Science*. 2015; **347**(6220): 1261952.
**PubMed Abstract** | **Publisher Full Text**

140. Roth NX, Milam SN, Cordiner MA, et al.: Rapidly varying anisotropic methanol (CH<sub>3</sub>OH) production in the inner coma of comet 46p/Wirtanen as revealed by the ALMA Atacama compact array. *Planet Sci J.* 2021; 2(2): 55.
**Publisher Full Text**

141. Dello Russo N, Kawakita H, Vervack RJ, et al.: Emerging trends and a comet taxonomy based on the volatile chemistry measured in thirty comets with high-resolution infrared spectroscopy between 1997 and 2013. *Icarus*. 2016; **278**: 301-332.
**Publisher Full Text**

142. Paganini L, Mumma MJ, Gibb EL, et al.: Ground-based detection of deuterated Water in comet C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) at IR wavelengths. *ApJL*. 2017; **836**(2): L25.
**Publisher Full Text**

143. Brinch C, Hogerheijde MR: LIME - a flexible, non-LTE line excitation and radiation transfer method for millimeter and far-infrared wavelengths. A&A, 2010; **523**: A25.
**Publisher Full Text**

144. Cordiner MA, Coulson IM, Garcia-Berrios E, et al.: A sublime 3D model for cometary coma emission: the hypervolatile-rich comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS). *ApJ*. 2022; **929**(1): 38.
**Publisher Full Text**
# Open Peer Review

Current Peer Review Status: ✓ ✓ ✓

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>

## Version 1

Reviewer Report 14 August 2024

https://doi.org/10.21956/openreseurope.18882.r42596

© 2024 Hakim K. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>

## Kaustubh Hakim

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

¹ Royal Observatory of Belgium, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

² Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium

There is an urgent need for a larger aperture, multi-beam, single dish (sub)mm facility to improve sensitivity and dynamic range of weak molecular lines, to achieve high spatial resolution, and to perform instantaneous multi-beam spectral imaging. AtLAST is a planned unprecedented 50-m single-dish multi-beam facility with an instrument suite that accesses the 100-950 GHz frequency range. The manuscript highlights four major science cases including giant and terrestrial planet atmospheres, plumes of icy moons and comets. Overall, the case for AtLAST planetary science is comprehensive and well presented. I recommend approval with attention to the following very minor points.

Science case i: paragraph 2: I would remove the phrase “and by extension, exoplanets with similar sizes and compositions” because there is no mention of specific cases for exoplanets. If this phrase were to be kept, I would recommend adding some exoplanet cases and providing information on whether the resolution would be sufficient to isolate exoplanet signals from those of their host stars.

Science case ii: Titan: An opportunity is being missed here by not elaborating on the potential synergy between AtLAST and DragonFly.

Science case ii: Mars: Can the Martian crustal magnetic field can be detected with AtLAST frequencies? If yes, it would be an exciting prospect. See, e.g., (Larsson et al., 2013)

Science case iii: Can Triton be really studied with AtLAST given the poor numbers for Neptune in Table 1?

Science case iii: Enceladus: The possibility of plume chemical evolution (e.g., HCN detection) of Enceladus is a tantalizing science case. Can mK sensitivity be maintained on short timescales at these frequencies?
**References**

1. Larsson R, Ramstad R, Mendrok J, Buehler S, et al.: A method for remote sensing of weak planetary magnetic fields: Simulated application to Mars. *Geophysical Research Letters*. 2013; **40** (19): 5014-5018 Publisher Full Text

**Is the background of the case's history and progression described in sufficient detail?**

Yes

**Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?**

Yes

**If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?**

Yes

**Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?**

Yes

**Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?**

Yes

**Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for teaching or other practitioners?**

Yes

**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

**Reviewer Expertise:** planetary science; astrobiology; geochemistry

**I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.**

Author Response 12 Dec 2024

**Martin Cordiner**

We thank the referee for their useful and insightful comments, which have helped significantly improve the manuscript. Our responses to their individual comments are given below, and are addressed in the latest, revised version of the article.

**Reviewer Comment:**

Science case i: paragraph 2: I would remove the phrase "and by extension, exoplanets with similar sizes and compositions" because there is no mention of specific cases for exoplanets. If this phrase were to be kept, I would recommend adding some exoplanet cases and providing information on whether the resolution would be sufficient to isolate exoplanet signals from those of their host stars.

**Author Response:** Unfortunately, it is unlikely that AtLAST would have sufficient spatial resolution (or sensitivity) to resolve the (sub)millimeter emission from even very large
exoplanets --- note that ALMA, with its superior resolution, has recently detected accretion signatures in protoplanetary disks that imply the presence of forming planets, but ALMA has not observed any exoplanets directly. As mentioned in the introduction, the planets of our Solar System provide a key paradigm for the interpretation of a variety of exoplanet observations. Therefore, it is still useful to highlight the fact that a better understanding of our Solar System planets leads to improved understanding of exoplanets in general.

**Reviewer Comment:**

Science case ii: Titan: An opportunity is being missed here by not elaborating on the potential synergy between AtLAST and DragonFly.

**Author Response:** We now mention Dragonfly in the text for Science case ii.

**Reviewer Comment:**

Science case ii: Mars: Can the Martian crustal magnetic field can be detected with AtLAST frequencies? If yes, it would be an exciting prospect. See, e.g., (Larsson et al., 2013)

**Author Response:** Unfortunately, the 119 GHz O2 line investigated by Larsson et al. lies outside of the 3mm atmospheric transmission window, and therefore would not be observable by a ground-based telescope such as AtLAST

**Reviewer Comment:**

Science case iii: Can Triton be really studied with AtLAST given the poor numbers for Neptune in Table 1?

**Author Response:** Similar to Titan and Enceladus, the fact that Triton has an angular diameter less than the size of the AtLAST beam does not preclude the possibility of detecting atmospheric or exospheric emission, as long as the telescope sensitivity is high enough.

**Reviewer Comment:**

Science case iii: Enceladus: The possibility of plume chemical evolution (e.g., HCN detection) of Enceladus is a tantalizing science case. Can mK sensitivity be maintained on short timescales at these frequencies?

**Author Response:** We agree with the referee that temporally resolved studies of molecular abundance ratios would provide an interesting science case for Enceladus and other bodies. According to current estimates for the AtLAST sensitivity, the target spectral line sensitivity of ~1 mK per 1 km/s spectral bandwidth would be achievable in around 6 hours observing time (or a few mK in 1 h observing time). Although the intrinsic cadence of abundance variability in the Enceladus plume is unknown, at this nominal sensitivity, temporal abundance variations over a period of a few hours could be detectable. We suggest that the most conservative approach is to obtain secure molecular detections of the plume before planning a meaningful time-variability study.
**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Report 02 August 2024

https://doi.org/10.21956/openreseurope.18882.r41371

© 2024 Iino T. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>

## Takahiro Iino

The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Submillimeter radio wavelength observation technique has broaden our understandings of planetary environment and its origin. In particular, recent observational achievements by ALMA interferometer have played an important role thanks to its high spatial resolution and sensitivity. In turn, some technical limitations of interferometer have prevented us to obtain the precise observational parameter of solar system objects.

This paper aims to summarize and introduce the solar system observational science possibly revealed by newly available wide-aperture single-dish submillimeter telescope, AtLast, which will dissolve the limitation of interferometric observation. In this manuscript, wide range of main solar system science theme have been covered by the professionals, and previous achievements in the fields are introduced properly. The needs for instrumental capability such as frequency coverage, dynamic range and time domain operation capability are described and summarized from scientific point of view. Despite the manuscript includes various scientific fields, citations of previous researches are well described and future perspective of AtLast is also appropriate and interesting.

This manuscript is important and helpful for providing possible scientific achievements to be addressed in 2030s with a new wide-aperture sub-millimeter telescope. In summary, I recommend that it for indexing after revising some minor points. Since this manuscript deal with a range of scientific theme, addition of some references may be helpful. In addition, consideration of revision of instrumental parameters may be needed.

### --- Below are minor comments

- In the Prior/existing instruments and results subsection in Introduction section, please consider to add (Rosenqvist et al., 1993)[ Ref-1] as the first detection paper of CO and HCN on Neptune achieved simultaneously with (Martenet et al., 1993), [Ref-2] as well as (Hesman et al., 2007) [Ref-3] as the implication of cometary CO supply on Neptune.

In addition, I suppose that (sub)millimeter observation campaign on Jupiter to investigate the aftermath of SL9 impact was a great advance on the solar system radio astronomy. Please consider to describe the campaign by citing (Moreno et al., 2003) [Ref-4], P&SS and relating materials.
- In the section of "The Need for a Larger Aperture, Multi-Beam, Single Dish (Sub)Millimeter Facility": ALMA's dynamic ranges are introduced here. Please consider to add technical reference of the described dynamic range value.

- In Dynamics subsection in Science case i section, only *J* = 1-0 is listed as PH3 transition. On Jupiter, higher transitions may be better targets (please see Weisstein et al., 1996,[Ref-5] Icarus, for the radiative transfer analysis and FTS results). Please consider to add other transitions or to clarify the reason to choose *J*=1-0.

- In Dynamics subsection in Science case i section, rounding of HCN rotational frequencies may not be correct.

- In Chemistry subsection in Science case i section, frequency bands of nitriles are listed. Please consider to clarify the reason why the authors selected some specific frequency bands as the target bands.

- In Chemistry subsection in Science case i section, after "With a spectroscopic dynamic range ≳ 104, measurement of more accurate isotopic ratios for...". I suppose that the 13C carbon isotopic ratio has less scientific information than O, N and H, and measured already in some planetary atmosphere. please consider to add D/H in this list or to remove 13C.

- In science case iii section, the authors described that "the peak antenna temperature for the HCN *J* = 4 – 3 transition is calculated to be ⩽ 25 mK". However, considering 25K rotational temperature, rotational transition of HCN that exhibits maximum intensity at that environment may be *J*=3-2 or lower transition. Please consider to clarify the reasons why *J*=4-3 was chosen.

- In Science case iv section, as the authors described that "Since comets are dynamic, time-variable objects..., I believe that time-domain observation on comets is crucial. Please consider to add both short- and long-term changes observation results such as (Bockelée-Morvan et al., 2008) [Ref-6] of 17P/Holmes outburt and (Biver et al., 1997) [Ref-7] of C/1995 O1 monitoring result, respectively, for example.

## References

1. Rosenqvist J, Lellouch E, Romani P, Paubert G, et al.: Millimeter-wave observations of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune - CO and HCN on Neptune. *The Astrophysical Journal*. 1992; **392**. Publisher Full Text

2. Marten A, Gautier D, Owen T, Sanders D, et al.: First observations of CO and HCN on Neptune and Uranus at millimeter wavelengths and the implications for atmospheric chemistry. *The Astrophysical Journal*. 1993; **406**. Publisher Full Text

3. Hesman B, Davis G, Matthews H, Orton G: The abundance profile of CO in Neptune's atmosphere. *Icarus*. 2007; **186** (2): 342-353. Publisher Full Text

4. Moreno R, Marten A, Matthews H, Biraud Y: Long-term evolution of CO, CS and HCN in Jupiter after the impacts of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. *Planetary and Space Science*. 2003; **51** (9-10): 591-611. Publisher Full Text

5. Weisstein E, Serabyn E: Submillimeter Line Search in Jupiter and Saturn. *Icarus*. 1996; **123** (1): 23-36. Publisher Full Text

6. Bockelée-Morvan D, Biver N, Jehin E, Cochran A, et al.: Large Excess of Heavy Nitrogen in Both Hydrogen Cyanide and Cyanogen from Comet 17P/Holmes. *The Astrophysical Journal*. 2008; **679** (1): L49-L52. Publisher Full Text

7. Biver N, Bockelée-Morvan D, Colom P, Crovisier J, et al.: Evolution of the outgassing of comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1) from radio observations. *Science*. 1997; **275** (5308): 1915-8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Is the background of the case's history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes

**Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?**

Yes

**If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?**

Not applicable

**Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?**

Not applicable

**Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?**

Yes

**Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for teaching or other practitioners?**

Yes

**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

**Reviewer Expertise:** (sub)millimeter observational study on the planetary atmsopheric chemistry and physics.

**I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.**

Author Response 12 Dec 2024

**Martin Cordiner**

We thank the referee for taking the time to review this article, and for their comments and suggestions for improvement, which we have incorporated into the revised version. Our responses to their individual comments are given below.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- Below are minor comments

- In the Prior/existing instruments and results subsection in Introduction section, please consider to add (Rosenqvist et al., 1993)[ Ref-1] as the first detection paper of CO and HCN on Neptune achieved simultaneously with (Martenet et al., 1993), [Ref-2] as well as (Hesman et al., 2007) [Ref-3] as the implication of cometary CO supply on Neptune.

**Author Response:** Done.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In addition, I suppose that (sub)millimeter observation campaign on Jupiter to investigate the aftermath of SL9 impact was a great advance on the solar system radio astronomy. Please consider to describe the campaign by citing (Moreno et al., 2003) [Ref-4], P&SS and relating materials.
**Author Response:** Done.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In the section of "The Need for a Larger Aperture, Multi-Beam, Single Dish (Sub)Millimeter Facility": ALMA's dynamic ranges are introduced here. Please consider to add technical reference of the described dynamic range value.

**Author Response:** Reference to the ALMA technical handbook added.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In Dynamics subsection in Science case i section, only *J* = 1-0 is listed as PH3 transition. On Jupiter, higher transitions may be better targets (please see Weisstein et al., 1996,[Ref-5] Icarus, for the radiative transfer analysis and FTS results). Please consider to add other transitions or to clarify the reason to choose *J*=1-0.

**Author Response:** We now also mention the PH3 800 GHz transition. Note that the 534 GHz transition is obscured by telluric H2O.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In Dynamics subsection in Science case i section, rounding of HCN rotational frequencies may not be correct.

**Author Response:** Fixed. We also added the 177 GHz line.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In Chemistry subsection in Science case i section, frequency bands of nitriles are listed. Please consider to clarify the reason why the authors selected some specific frequency bands as the target bands.

**Author Response:** There are too many transitions to mention for these, relatively more complex molecules, so a selection of representative transition frequencies was given. However, these were chosen in an ad-hoc manner. Considering the precise line strengths vary as a function of which planet we are looking at (and which region of the atmosphere), we now choose to no longer mention specific frequencies for these molecules.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In Chemistry subsection in Science case i section, after "With a spectroscopic dynamic range ≥ 10⁴, measurement of more accurate isotopic ratios for...". I suppose that the 13C carbon isotopic ratio has less scientific information than O, N and H, and measured already in some planetary atmosphere. please consider to add D/H in this list or to remove 13C.

**Author Response:** A number of unusual 13C isotopic ratio measurements have begun to emerge in the exoplanet and protoplanetary disk literature, so it seems worthwhile to continue to study it in the Solar System. We have now added D to the list of isotopes.

**Reviewer Comments:**
- In science case iii section, the authors described that "the peak antenna temperature for the HCN J = 4 - 3 transition is calculated to be ≈ 25 mK". However, considering 25K rotational temperature, rotational transition of HCN that exhibits maximum intensity at that environment may be J=3-2 or lower transition. Please consider to clarify the reasons why J=4-3 was chosen.

**Author Response:** In choosing the J=4-3 transition, the balance of excitation and beam dilution factors were considered. The 3-2 and 4-3 lines actually have very similar opacities at 25 K, so the smaller beam size at 355 GHz leads to a higher beam-averaged antenna temperature.

**Reviewer Comments:**

- In Science case iv section, as the authors described that "Since comets are dynamic, time-variable objects..., I believe that time-domain observation on comets is crucial. Please consider to add both short- and long-term changes observation results such as (Bockelee-Morvan et al., 2008) [Ref-6] of 17P/Holmes outburt and (Biver et al., 1997) [Ref-7] of C/1995 O1 monitoring result, respectively, for example.

**Author Response:** References have been added to support the statement. For comet Holmes, we cite Montalto et al. (2008) instead of Bockelee-Morvan et al., 2008, since it contains a more detailed description of the outburst event.

**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Report 24 June 2024

https://doi.org/10.21956/openreseurope.18882.r41108

© 2024 Sagawa H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>

Hideo Sagawa

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

This paper describes the solar system science use cases for a large aperture single-dish submm telescope. Submm spectroscopic/mapping observations are quite powerful in solar system science. A large aperture single-dish can cover observation areas where existing ALMA and other telescopes are inadequate.

The paper is clearly written, and I don't find any major concern for indexing.

The authors provide a very clear overview of solar system science using submm-waves to date.

This article is a very good introduction (with complete citations to important references in the field) for new researchers entering this field. I thank the authors for this effort.
===

The following are minor comments. I recognize that some of the comments are too technical to be described in this science use case paper, but I included them just for reference only.

page 5

- Introduction

*1st paragraph: "100 - 950 GHz" -> Is there any special reason to define the upper boundary as 950 GHz? Perhaps, 1000 GHz can be accepted.

*Last part of the 5th paragraph: The authors summarise existing interferometers, VLA, BIMA, SMA, and ALMA together in one sentence. I believe that ALMA is a revolutionary interferometer that has led to a significant improvement in observational performance compared to other interferometers. So, personally, I thought it would be good to distinguish references to ALMA, rather than describing it in the same sentence as BIMA and others, and to convey the fact that ALMA brought a new stage of interferometric observation.

page 6

* Right column (Improved sensitivity and dynamic range for molecular detections): I agree that the authors' arguments are very important points. Regarding the need for an extremely flat bandpass, is there any new technology planned to be implemented in AtLAST in the optics or receiver system? Or is the performance comparable to existing telescopes (e.g. JCMT)? As for standing waves, solar system objects are too bright, so I think we may need stricter standards than the usual astronomical sense.

* Last sentence: "Cometary comae are highly diffuse and extended objects." -> Could you provide specific numbers here?

page 7

* Figure 1 and Table 1: I think there is considerable overlap in content. Table 1 could be removed, but I would leave it to the authors to decide. Also, it would be nice to have a figure or table to compare the spatial resolution with existing single-dish (JCMT) and interferometers (ALMA). However, if new figures and tables are added, the main text will also need some modifications.

* Right column: "without severe beam dilution (particularly above ~800 GHz)." -> I would add a brief explanation about "beam dilution".

* "Large planets such as Jupiter and Saturn are ... that are resolved out at long baselines." -> Could you provide specific numbers about how much the typical scale size to be resolved out is? Maybe adding some numbers from ALMA's maximum recoverable scale is a good idea.
page 8

* Left column (Instantaneous multi-beam spectral mapping): As an introduction to existing instruments, the authors could provide an example of the JCMT HARP.

* Right column: "(1) small-scale vertical (radial) variations" -> Phrase "radial" seems odd for me...

page 9

* Left column: "...ALMA Band 3 observations (Figure 2, right panel)" -> I would add the information of wavelength for Band 3, as not all of readers are familiar with Band numbering.

* Right column: "Wide bandwidth (>a few GHz)...so the deep temperature and composition can be characterized, which complements observations in the IR down to ~1 bar." -> It would be very helpful if the authors can provide weighting functions of the listed submm lines (although I leave it to the authors to decide).

* Right column: "Zonal wind speeds can also be inferred through infrared measurements of the thermal wind shear." -> Thermal wind equation is usually not applicable to equatorial region due to the low Coriolis force. Recently there is a new attempt to derive a modified thermal wind equation which is valid to the equator: Marcus et al. (2019) Icarus, 324, 198-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.037

The authors can cite this paper here. By the way, I did not think the current reference (Ref.79 future Giant planetary mission paper by Fletcher et al. 2020) necessarily appropriate.

* Figure 2: The authors shows Jupiter maps taken by ALMA. In these maps, Jupiter's zone & belt features are clearly represented. On the other hand, somewhere in the main text, it was mentioned that ALMA is not very good at observing extended objects - which I agree with. In the case of this Jupiter maps, I thought it would be good to have a brief explanation of how such ALMA's shortcomings were dealt with.

page 10

* Right column (at the 1st sentence of "Chemistry"): ""non-equilibrium"" -> Please add more explanation, as it is not sure what you mean by non-equilibrium with respect to what.

page 11

* Left column, 1st sentence: "To perform these investigations requires wideband (> 16 GHz), ..." -> I thought that if there were some kind of simulated spectrum plot that shows very broad absorption, it would make the specificity of the need for a bandwidth > 16 GHz more compelling. Alternatively, it would be good to describe some specific numbers on how broad the Neptune CO line (cited in this paragraph) actually are in terms of the broad absorptioon wings.
* Right column (1st paragraph of Science case II): there is an unnecessary hyphen in "spectroscopic".

* Right column: Venus is usually close to the Sun, and its closeness is always problem for ground-based observations. Does AtLAST have any sun avoidance elongation limitation? Or, can it observe an object very close to the Sun?

* Right column: "Mapping ... Venus with strong transitions (such as SO2, SO, and CO)" --> I am a little reluctant to say SO2 or SO as a strong line. At the very least, I think it is by far the weakest compared to CO, no?

page 12

* Left column (2nd paragraph): "The Venus Express and Akatsuki ... detected ... SO2 and CO abundances..." -> Maybe the authors can put some references here (is there any work about long term variation of CO?).

* Left column (last paragraph): "... ground-based measurements ... will be required to contextualize in situ data from ... DAVINCI+, VERITAS, and EnVision." -> Remove "in situ" because DAVINCI is the only in-situ probe mission and the other two, VERITAS and EnVision, do not carry any in-situ atmospheric sensors.

* Right column (1st paragraph): "...the comparative weakness of the mm-wave absorption lines..." -> I think "mm" should be "submm" or "(sub)mm".

* Right column (last paragraph): "Discrepancies between the observed wind ... predicted by state-of-the-art climate models ..." -> This sentence is discussing about the Martian atmosphere at very high altitude of 140 - 240 km. It appears a little strange to call a model of such high altitude atmosphere a climate model. I think it is better to call it "a global ionosphere-thermosphere model" or simply "a general circulation model".

page 13

* Left column first paragraph: "As shown by 113, comparison of ground-based Mars CO mapping... (see Figure 5) indicates significant discrepancies in the wind speeds and their spatial structure..." - Current Fig.5 shows the spectral mapping of CO (1-0), and from this figure alone, it is difficult to determine the discrepancy in the wind speed field as described in the text. I think it would be better to revise the sentence in the text slightly or revise the figure to one that much clearly shows the difference from the model regarding winds.

* Although the authors do not specifically mention it, it can also be pointed out that one of the
most interesting aspects of (sub)mm-wave observations of Mars is that the optical thickness of
Martian dust is nearly negligible. Indeed, there are some unique past studies, such as Gurwell et
al. (2005) Icarus, 175, 23-31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.009.

page 14

* Left column (middle area): "...N2/C2H4 and HCN/C2H3 ref127;)." -> Unnecessary ; is inserted.

* Left colom last paragraph: "To avoid Saturn and exclude it from the 2nd and 3rd sidelobes of the primary beam..." -> I agree that this is a very important point. In fact, in past Herschel observations of Ganymede, the team detected a strong H2O absorption line (much to the excitement of the team members), but upon closer examination, they found that the sidelobes of Herschel's primary beam were partially overlapping with Jupiter. If interested, check the conference presentation named "Detection and Characterisation of Ganymede's and Callisto's Water Atmospheres" by Hartogh et al. (2013) in "The Universe Explored by Herschel".
https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/herschel/the-universe-explored-by-herschel

page 15

* Right column: "...in Figure 6 will require milli-Kelvin sensitivity..." -> I would use "~1 mK sensitivity" to unify notation with other parts.

page 17

* Summary

For the solar system, especially planetary atmospheres, capability of long-term, continuous
(monitoring) observations is important. ALMA has strict limitations on the duplicated observation
proposals, and it is difficult to propose long-term continuous observations over multiple cycles.
Does AtLAST anticipate such long-term observation proposals?

**Is the background of the case's history and progression described in sufficient detail?**

Yes

**Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?**

Yes

**If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?**

Not applicable

**Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?**

Not applicable

**Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?**

Yes

**Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for teaching or other practitioners?**
Yes

**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.

**Reviewer Expertise:** planetary science; (sub)mm and infrared observations; radiative transfer in planetary atmospheres

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Author Response 12 Dec 2024

**Martin Cordiner**

We thank the referee for their useful and insightful comments, which have helped significantly improve the manuscript. Our responses to their individual comments are given below, and are addressed in the latest, revised version of the article.

page 5

- Introduction

*1st paragraph: "100 - 950 GHz" -> Is there any special reason to define the upper boundary as 950 GHz? Perhaps, 1000 GHz can be accepted.

**Author Response:** Indeed, the upper end of the submillimeter band lies at THz frequencies so we have modified the text accordingly.

*Last part of the 5th paragraph: The authors summarise existing interferometers, VLA, BIMA, SMA, and ALMA together in one sentence. I believe that ALMA is a revolutionary interferometer that has led to a significant improvement in observational performance compared to other interferometers. So, personally, I thought it would be good to distinguish references to ALMA, rather than describing it in the same sentence as BIMA and others, and to convey the fact that ALMA brought a new stages of interferometric observation.

**Author Response:** Agree. Text modified accordingly.

page 6

* Right column (Improved sensitivity and dynamic range for molecular detections): I agree that the authors' arguments are very important points. Regarding the need for an extremely flat bandpass, is there any new technology planned to be implemented in AtLAST in the optics or receiver system? Or is the performance comparable to existing telescopes (e.g. JCMT)?

As for standing waves, solar system objects are too bright, so I think we may need stricter standards than the usual astronomical sense.

**Author Response:** We thank the referee for reiterating the importance of an extremely flat spectral bandpass. We therefore recommend in our article that mitigation of reflections and standing waves in the optics be factored into the AtLAST telescope and receiver design.
* Last sentence: "Cometary comae are highly diffuse and extended objects." -> Could you provide specific numbers here?

**Author Response:** Done.

page 7

* Figure 1 and Table 1: I think there is considerable overlap in content. Table 1 could be removed, but I would leave it to the authors to decide.

Also, it would be nice to have a figure or table to compare the spatial resolution with existing single-dish (JCMT) and interferometers (ALMA). However, if new figures and tables are added, the main text will also need some modifications.

**Author Response:** Table 1 clarifies the frequency dependence of the angular resolution, and helps assist in the interpretation of Figure 1, so we prefer to keep it.

* Right column: "without severe beam dilution (particularly above ~800 GHz)." -> I would add a brief explanation about "beam dilution".

**Author Response:** Done.

* "Large planets such as Jupiter and Saturn are ... that are resolve out at long baselines." -> Could you provide specific numbers about how much the typical scale size to be resolved out is? Maybe adding some numbers from ALMA's maximum recoverable scale is a good idea. **Author Response:** Done.

page 8

* Left column (Instantaneous multi-beam spectral mapping): As an introduction to existing instruments, the authors could provide an example of the JCMT HARP.

**Author Response:** A reference to the JCMT HARP study of comet R2/PanSTARRS by Cordiner et al. (2022) has been added.

* Right column: "(1) small-scale vertical (radial) variations" -> Phrase "radial" seems odd for me...

**Author Response:** It is odd nomenclature for a planetary scientist, yet "vertical" is also an odd term for an astrophysicist, so the clarification seems useful, given the broad utility of AtLAST in the astrophysics community.

page 9

* Left column: "...ALMA Band 3 observations (Figure 2, right panel)" -> I would add the information of wavelength for Band 3, as not all of readers are familiar with Band numbering. **Author Response:** Done.

* Right column: "Wide bandwidth (>a few GHz)...so the deep temperature and composition can be characterized, which complements observations in the IR down to ~1 bar." -> It would be very helpful if the authors can provide weighting functions of the listed submm lines (although I leave it to the authors to decide).
**Author Response: TBD**

* Right column: "Zonal wind speeds can also be inferred through infrared measurements of the thermal wind shear." -> Thermal wind equation is usually not applicable to equatorial region due to the low Coriolis force. Recently there is a new attempt to derive a modified thermal wind equation which is valid to the equator: Marcus et al. (2019) Icarus, 324, 198-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.037

The authors can cite this paper here. By the way, I did not think the current reference (Ref.79 future Giant planetary mission paper by Fletcher et al. 2020) necessarily appropriate.

**Author Response:** The correct reference to a different paper by Fletcher et al. (2020) has now been added.

* Figure 2: The authors shows Jupiter maps taken by ALMA. In these maps, Jupiter's zone & belt features are clearly represented. On the other hand, somewhere in the main text, it was mentioned that ALMA is not very good at observing extended objects - which I agree with. In the case of this Jupiter maps, I thought it would be good to have a brief explanation of how such ALMA's shortcomings were dealt with.

**Author Response:** We thank the referee for pointing out this apparent contradiction and have added a note of explanation to the Figure caption regarding the lack of short spacing data, which is, in fact, not needed for such "longitudinally smeared" images.

page 10

* Right column (at the 1st sentence of "Chemistry"): ""non-equilibrium"" -> Please add more explanation, as it is not sure what you mean by non-equilibrium with respect to what.

**Author Response:** An explanation of the concept of non-equilibrium chemistry is beyond the scope of our article. We refer the reader to the references given at the end of the following sentence if they wish to learn more.

page 11

* Left column, 1st sentence: "To perform these investigations requires wideband (> 16 GHz), ..." -> I thought that if there were some kind of simulated spectrum plot that shows very broad absorption, it would make the specificity of the need for a bandwidth > 16 GHz more compelling.

Alternatively, it would be good to describe some specific numbers on how broad the Neptune CO line (cited in this paragraph) actually are in terms of the broad absorptioon wings.

**Author Response:** We have clarified the Neptune CO line morphology and added additional references to Rosenqvist et al. (1992), Lellouch et al. (2005) and Hesman et al. (2007).

* Right column (1st paragraph of Science case II): there is an unnecessary hyphen in "spectro-scopic".

**Author Response:** We refer this issue to the journal typesetters.
* Right column: Venus is usually close to the Sun, and its closeness is always problem for ground-based observations. Does AtLAST have any sun avoidance elongation limitation? Or, can it observe an object very close to the Sun?

**Author Response:** As mentioned in the article, AtLAST is expected to allow observations of near-sun targets including Mercury and Venus, which will necessitate pointing of the telescope at solar elongations ~10-30 degrees. We have added a new subsection to the Summary near the end of the article to clarify these requirements. Solar observations are also in the current AtLAST science portfolio (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.00920).

* Right column: "Mapping ... Venus with strong transitions (such as SO2, SO, and CO)" --> I am a little reluctant to say SO2 or SO as a strong line. At the very least, I think it is by far the weakest compared to CO, no?

**Author Response:** We thank the referee for pointing this out, and have revised the text accordingly.

page 12

* Left column (2nd paragraph): "The Venus Express and Akatsuki ... detected ... SO2 and CO abundances..." -> Maybe the authors can put some references here (is there any work about long term variation of CO?).

**Author Response:** The required information can be found in the review by Marcq et al. (2018). Reference added.

* Left column (last paragraph): "... ground-based measurements ... will be required to contextualize in situ data from ... DAVINCI+, VERITAS, and EnVision." -> Remove "in situ" because DAVINCI is the only in-situ probe mission and the other two, VERITAS and EnVision, do not carry any in-situ atmospheric sensors.

**Author Response:** We have added "and orbiting" to clarify the situation.

* Right column (1st paragraph): "...the comparative weakness of the mm-wave absorption lines..." -> I think "mm" should be "submm" or "(sub)mm".

**Author Response:** Done.

* Right column (last paragraph): "Discrepancies between the observed wind ... predicted by state-of-the-art climate models ..." -> This sentence is discussing about the Martian atmosphere at very high altitude of 140 - 240 km. It appears a little strange to call a model of such high altitude atmosphere a climate model. I think it is better to call it "a global ionosphere-thermosphere model" or simply "a general circulation model".

**Author Response:** Done.

page 13

* Left column first paragraph: "As shown by 113, comparison of ground-based Mars CO mapping... (see Figure 5) indicates significant discrepancies in the wind speeds and their
spatial structure..." -> Current Fig.5 shows the spectral mapping of CO (1-0), and from this figure alone, it is difficult to determine the discrepancy in the wind speed field as described in the text. I think it would be better to revise the sentence in the text slightly or revise the figure to one that much clearly shows the difference from the model regarding winds.

**Author Response:** Done.

* Although the authors do not specifically mention it, it can also be pointed out that one of the most interesting aspects of (sub)mm-wave observations of Mars is that the optical thickness of Martian dust is nearly negligible. Indeed, there are some unique past studies, such as Gurwell et al. (2005) Icarus, 175, 23-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.009.

**Author Response:** Reference to Gurwell et al. (2005) added.

page 14

* Left column (middle area): "...N2/C2H4 and HCN/C2H3 ref127;)." -> Unnecessary; is inserted.

**Author Response:** Fixed.

* Left column last paragraph: "To avoid Saturn and exclude it from the 2nd and 3rd sidelobes of the primary beam..." -> I agree that this is a very important point. In fact, in past Herschel observations of Ganymede, the team detected a strong H2O absorption line (much to the excitement of the team members), but upon closer examination, they found that the sidelobes of Herschel's primary beam were partially overlapping with Jupiter. If interested, check the conference presentation named "Detection and Characterisation of Ganymede's and Callisto's Water Atmospheres" by Hartogh et al. (2013) in "The Universe Explored by Herschel".
https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/herschel/the-universe-explored-by-herschel

page 15

* Right column: "...in Figure 6 will require milli-Kelvin sensitivity..." -> I would use "~1 mK sensitivity" to unify notation with other parts.

**Author Response:** Done.

page 17

* Summary

For the solar system, especially planetary atmospheres, capability of long-term, continuous (monitoring) observations is important. ALMA has strict limitations on the duplicated observation proposals, and it is difficult to propose long-term continuous observations over multiple cycles. Does AtLAST anticipate such long-term observation proposals?

**Author Response:** A sentence on the requirement for long-term observations spanning several years has been added at the end of the Summary.

**Competing Interests:** No competing interests were disclosed.