# Avian eggshell formation reveals a new paradigm for vertebrate mineralization via vesicular amorphous calcium carbonate

Lilian Stapane, Nathalie Le Roy, Jacky Ezagal, Alejandro Rodriguez-Navarro, Valérie Labas, Lucie Combes-Soia, Maxwell Hincke, Joël Gautron

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Lilian Stapane, Nathalie Le Roy, Jacky Ezagal, Alejandro Rodriguez-Navarro, Valérie Labas, et al.. Avian eggshell formation reveals a new paradigm for vertebrate mineralization via vesicular amorphous calcium carbonate. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2020, 295 (47), pp.15853-15869. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014542 . hal-03467835

HAL Id: hal-03467835

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03467835

Submitted on 7 Dec 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Avian eggshell formation reveals a new paradigm for vertebrate mineralization via vesicular amorphous calcium carbonate

Received for publication, July 20, 2020 Published, Papers in Press, August 18, 2020, DOI 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014542

Lilian Stapane¹, Nathalie Le Roy¹●, Jacky Ezagal¹, Alejandro B. Rodriguez-Navarro², Valérie Labas³, Lucie Combes-Soia³, Maxwell T. Hincke⁴, and Joël Gautron¹,*

From ¹BOA INRAe, Université de Tours, Nouzilly, France, the ²Departmento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain, the ³Unité Mixte de Recherches Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Université de Tours, IFCE, Nouzilly, France, and the ⁴Department of Innovation in Medical Education, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Edited by Gerald W. Hart

Amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) is an unstable mineral phase, which is progressively transformed into aragonite or calcite in biomineralization of marine invertebrate shells or avian eggshells, respectively. We have previously proposed a model of vesicular transport to provide stabilized ACC in chicken uterine fluid where eggshell mineralization takes place. Herein, we report further experimental support for this model. We confirmed the presence of extracellular vesicles (EVs) using transmission EM and showed high levels of mRNA of vesicular markers in the oviduct segments where eggshell mineralization occurs. We also demonstrate that EVs contain ACC in uterine fluid using spectroscopic analysis. Moreover, proteomics and immunofluorescence confirmed the presence of major vesicular, mineralization-specific and eggshell matrix proteins in the uterus and in purified EVs. We propose a comprehensive role for EVs in eggshell mineralization, in which annexins transfer calcium into vesicles and carbonic anhydrase 4 catalyzes the formation of bicarbonate ions ($HCO_3^-$), for accumulation of ACC in vesicles. We hypothesize that ACC is stabilized by ovalbumin and/or lysozyme or additional vesicle proteins identified in this study. Finally, EDIL3 and MFGE8 are proposed to serve as guidance molecules to target EVs to the mineralization site. We therefore report for the first-time experimental evidence for the components of vesicular transport to supply ACC in a vertebrate model of biomineralization.

Biomineralization is a ubiquitous process by which living organisms produce minerals that they use for many different functions (i.e. protection, gravity sensing) (1). The formation of calcium carbonate ($CaCO_3$) or phosphate biominerals requires high local concentrations of calcium. Transient amorphous mineral phases that are highly soluble and reactive are a source of ions or a precursor phase for the formation of complex-shaped crystalline biomineral structures. Amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) is a metastable polymorph of $CaCO_3$, and can provide high concentrations of ions for rapid physiological calcite and aragonite biomineralization (2). The high solubility of these metastable phases requires stabilization by regulatory

molecules (3–9). Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are candidates to play a role in the stabilization and delivery of ACC (6–9). However, experimental evidence for EVs in ACC-mediated calcification in $CaCO_3$ biominerals is only available for invertebrate structures such as sea urchin spines (calcite) and molluscan shells (4, 10, 11).

Among vertebrates, the avian class (Aves) appeared around 91 million years ago and is divided into Paleognathae (ancient birds such as ostrich, rhea, and emu) and Neognathae (modern birds such as chicken, turkey, or zebra finch) (12). All birds produce eggs with a hard-mineral shell composed of $CaCO_3$ in the form of calcite, which is critical for development of the embryo within an autonomous chamber (13). In addition to defense against physical aggression, the eggshell protects the egg contents against microbial contamination, regulates water and gaseous exchange, and is a calcium source for embryonic bone calcification (14, 15). The chicken eggshell is a widely utilized experimental model for biomineralization. Eggshell formation occurs in the distal part of the hen oviduct (red isthmus and uterus) and is one of the fastest known processes of vertebrate biomineralization (16–18). In chickens, 6 g of $CaCO_3$ is rapidly deposited in a very short time (<18 h; deposition rate of 0.32 g/h) (19). During this extracellular process, the uterine cells secrete organic and mineral eggshell precursors into the uterine fluid (UF) where mineralization takes place (20–22). Both mineral and organic precursors interact to produce the specific eggshell texture and its resulting mechanical properties (17, 23). This process requires transport of large amounts of calcium and carbonate to the site of eggshell calcification; these ions are continuously supplied from the blood across the uterine epithelium (24). The active transepithelial transfer of calcium and carbonate is well described and constitutes the current model for eggshell calcification (21, 25). Alternatively, transport of stabilized ACC mineral in vesicles has been proposed (9).

In chicken eggshell mineralization, the important role of ACC has been described (26). During the earliest stage, massive deposits of ACC accumulate at specific nucleation sites (mamillary knobs) on the eggshell membrane. Subsequently, ACC transforms into calcite crystals. Moreover, progressive ACC dissolution continuously supplies local ions to support the

<footnote>This article contains supporting information.</footnote>

<footnote>* For correspondence: Joël Gautron, joel.gautron@inrae.fr.</footnote>

<footnote>This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.</footnote>
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** TEM of uterine cells. A, TEM micrograph of uterine epithelium showing secretory activity (16 h p.o.). B–D, higher magnification TEM micrographs of uterine cells showing examples of exocytosis activity. E and F, TEM micrographs illustrating the presence of numerous EVs in the uterine lumen (UL) at 7 (F) and 16 h p.o. (E). Thin sections of uterus were negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate. C, cilia; CC, ciliated cells; DG, dense granule; LG, light granule; N, nucleus; UL, uterine lumen. White arrowheads indicate vesicle budding. Bars: A = 5 µM, B and F = 1000 nm, C = 500 nm, D and E = 200 nm.</figcaption></figure>

rapid growth of columnar calcite crystals that constitute the palisade layer (26). In a recent study, we used bioinformatics tools, mRNA levels, and protein quantification to explore the role of EDIL3 and MFGE8 in chicken eggshell biomineralization. We hypothesized that EDIL3 and MFGE8 bind to EVs budding from uterine cells into the uterine fluid, to guide vesicular transport of stabilized ACC for delivery to the mineralizing site and moreover prevent nonspecific precipitation (27).

To test this hypothesis, in the current study we have used transmission EM (TEM) to investigate exocytosis activity at the apical plasma membrane of uterine cells that could be a source of EVs in the uterine fluid. We quantified mRNA levels of a variety of validated EV components in the oviduct segments and other tissues. We purified EVs from UF and demonstrated the presence of key vesicular proteins in these vesicles. Finally, spectroscopic techniques (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS)) probed for ACC inside these EVs. This experimental study is the first to demonstrate vesicular transport of ACC in vertebrates, which we propose supports the rapid eggshell biomineralization process in birds.

## Results

### Transmission EM of uterine epithelial cells and uterine fluid

The presence of vesicles in the tissues and milieu involved in shell mineralization was investigated by TEM. Ultra-thin negatively stained sections of uterus epithelium were examined by TEM to investigate exocytosis activity adjacent to the luminal site of mineralization (Fig. 1). Uterine-ciliated cells possess numerous vacuolar and vesicular structures as well as dense and light granules (Fig. 1A). At higher magnification (Fig. 1, B–D) we observed vesicles in the cell cytoplasm, their accumulation at the apical plasma membrane, and their budding to generate EVs in the adjacent luminal uterine fluid (Fig. 1, C and D). Fig. 1, E and F, show EVs in the uterine fluid, with vesicle diameters in the 100-400 nm range. Vesicle membranes (rich in glycoproteins, proteins, and lipids) are stained by uranyl acetate and appear bright (high electron-density) versus their interiors that are darker (low electron density). However, some internal regions of vesicles also appeared electron-dense due to mineral deposits (see below). These TEM observations demonstrated

the presence of vesicles in the luminal uterine fluid adjacent to the apical region of uterine cells. The uterine epithelium contains ciliated and nonciliated cells, and the same results were observed in proximity to nonciliated cells (data not shown). UF was also examined by TEM (Figs. 2 and 3), where numerous EVs varying in diameter from 100 to 500 nm were observed (Figs. 2, A and C, and 3A).

### TEM and spectroscopic analysis of extracellular vesicle mineral deposits

At collection, uterine fluid was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen to preserve EVs and their cargo. Uterine fluid vesicles containing electron dense mineral deposits were observed by TEM and analyzed by EELS (Fig. 2) and EDS (Fig. 3).

EELS spectra show characteristics peaks from the calcium L₂,₃-edge (349.3 and 352.6 eV), carbon K-edge (285.0, 290.3, 295.5, and 301.5 eV), and oxygen K-edge (540.0 eV) (Fig. 2, B and D, Table S1). All carbon K-edge and oxygen K-edge peaks, except 285.0 eV, are characteristics of carbonate groups (28, 29). Thus, this analysis confirmed that the mineral deposits are calcium carbonate. Moreover, the 285.0 eV peak from the carbon K-edge is characteristic of amorphous carbon (from organics) and of C = C bonds, whereas the two peaks from the oxygen K-edge (534.0 and 545.5 eV) are also specific to C = O bonds (30). Therefore, EELS spectra confirmed the presence in the uterine EVs of an organic phase (phospholipids and proteins) as well as calcium carbonate mineral deposits, although low spectral resolution (0.25 eV) of the EELS detector did not allow differentiating among different polymorphs. However, selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of the vesicle mineral deposits showed diffuse rings indicative of the amorphous nature of calcium carbonate mineral (Fig. 3, F and G).

To determine the distribution of the organics and CaCO₃ mineral deposits, the carbon peak from the organics (237-290 eV) and calcium peaks (324-355 eV) were selected for mapping (Fig. 2, E–H). The carbon and calcium maps showed that the organic phase (C = C) was concentrated at the vesicle periphery (Fig. 2G), whereas calcium was concentrated within the vesicles. Merger of the carbon and calcium maps (Fig. 2H) clearly shows that the EV organic membranes (phospholipid
EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** TEM and EELS on UF. A and C, TEM micrograph of EVs observed in UF. Black arrowheads indicate the EVs. White boxes indicate EELS analysis area of B and D graphs. B and D, EELS spectroscopy on EVs from UF. The carbon K-edge shows three major peaks at 290.3, 295.5, and 301.5 electron volts (eV), characteristic of CaCO₃. The peak at 285.0 from the carbon K-edge reflects the presence of organic material. The two peaks 349.3 and 352.6 eV define the calcium L2,3-edge of EELS. The oxygen K-edge displays a major peak at 540.0 specific to the carbonate group (CO₃²⁻) and two other peaks at 534.0 and 545.5 indicate C = O bond. E, TEM micrograph of EV, observed in UF with associated mapping of calcium element (F) (324-355 eV). G, organic carbon (280-290 eV) and H, calcium + carbon combined elements detected by the EELS analysis. Bars: A = 1 µm, C = 200 nm, E to H = 500 nm.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** TEM on uterine fluid, EDS and SAED analyses. A, TEM of EVs observed in UF fraction at 16 h p.o. with associated mapping of (B) oxygen element, (C) calcium element, and (D) carbon element; as detected by the EDS analysis. E, EDS spectrum of the EVs observed in UF and shown in A. Filled white arrowhead indicates the calcium peak (3.690 keV) of EV, whereas striped and empty white arrowheads show carbon (0.277 keV) and oxygen (0.525 keV) peaks, respectively. Boxes point out the areas of EDS analysis. F and G, SAED pattern of the mineral detected in EV of UF. Diffuse scattering rings are characteristic of the ACC mineral. Bars: A to D = 500 nm, F = 1 µm, G = 51 nm.</figcaption></figure>

and proteins) enclose the amorphous calcium carbonate mineral deposits.

The distribution of calcium, carbon, and oxygen in uterine fluid vesicles were also analyzed using EDS (Fig. 3). Oxygen, carbon, and calcium elements co-localized within EVs (Fig. 3, A–D).

A high C background signal is notable, as samples were mounted on carbon-coated TEM grids. The difference between EDS spectrum 1 (EV), spectrum 2 (EV), and spectrum 3 (background) confirmed the presence of significant amounts of calcium and oxygen inside the EVs, compared with the background signal (Fig. 3E).
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

Indeed, calcium and oxygen signals in the EV were 3- to 5-times higher (spectrum 1) than the background (spectrum 3).

### Vesicular mRNA levels in various Gallus gallus tissues

We evaluated the literature on bone and cartilage extracellular vesicles (31–34), EVs (35–38), and the Vesiclepedia database (RRID:SCR_09011), which lists the top 100 proteins that are identified in EVs (39). A total of 33 genes coding for proteins involved in vesicular transport were selected, corresponding to proteins involved as calcium channels to supply calcium, bicarbonate supplier/transporter, chaperone molecules, addressing molecules, intracellular trafficking proteins, extracellular biogenesis and release, and signaling proteins (Table S2). mRNA levels for these 33 genes were quantified in different tissues and organs, namely oviduct segments, bone, duodenum, kidney, and liver (Table 1, Fig. 4). Tissue samples from four specialized oviduct regions were collected to evaluate the mRNA level of EV markers associated with egg white deposition (Ma), eggshell membrane formation (WI), and shell calcification (RI, Ut). Bone was selected as a mineralized tissue (with hydroxyapatite) where EVs have been demonstrated (31, 32, 40, 41). Duodenum (D) and kidney (K) exhibit active ion transport activity without any associated calcification. Finally, liver (L) was selected as an important organ involved in general metabolism. Comparisons of quantified mRNA levels in these organs and tissues were displayed using a heat map diagram (Fig. 4). Z-scores are expressed in terms of mean ± S.D. for each gene. Consequently, the color scale indicates the relative variation of each gene in the different tissues. We observed the highest Z-scores in oviduct segments (Ma, WI, RI, and Ut), for 20 vesicular genes (*Anxa1*, *Anxa2*, *Anxa8*, *Ap1g1*, *Cd9*, *Cd82*, *Edil3*, *Hspa8*, *Itgb1*, *Pdcd6ip*, *Rab5a*, *Rab27a*, *Sdcbp*, *Tsg101*, *Vamp3*, *Vamp7*, *Vps4*, *Vps26a*, *Ywhah*, and *Ywhaz*) compared with the other tissues (Clusters 6 to 8, Fig. 4). The mRNA level of genes was also analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey pairwise analysis (Table 1). With the notable exception of *Ap1g1*, all other genes with highest Z-scores in uterus were also significantly different in the same uterine tissue using ANOVA and pairwise analysis (Table 1). Additionally, these statistical tests show that *Itgb1*, *Sdcbp*, *Vamp7*, and *Vps4b* were also significantly overexpressed in one or several other tissues (bone (B), kidney (K), and duodenum (D)). *Anxa5*, *Anxa11*, *Ap1g1*, *Hsp90b*, and *Rab7a* were not differentially expressed in the various tissues tested. Both *Rab11a* and *Slc4a7* were significantly over-expressed in D, whereas *Ca2* and *Anxa7* were significantly over-expressed in B and K, respectively, to other tissues. *Arf6* exhibited a significantly higher mRNA level in D and uterus. The remaining three genes *Anxa6*, *Ralb*, and *Vcp* did not exhibit significantly different mRNA levels (Table 1).

### Proteomic and Western blotting analyses of EVs

To determine the protein composition of EVs isolated from the UF, we carried out proteomics analysis using nanoLC-MS/MS and verified these observations with Western blotting techniques. Twenty-nine nonredundant proteins

were identified in our proteomics analysis (Table 2). Among them, seven proteins correspond to predicted major actors in the hypothetical vesicular transport of ACC (carbonic anhydrase-4 (CA4), EGF-like repeat and discoidin I-like domain-containing protein 3 (EDIL3), ezrin (EZR), programmed cell death 6-interacting protein (PDCD6IP), syntenin-1, ovalbumin (OVA), and lysozyme C (LYZ); Tables 2 and 3) (27). In addition, several Igs and other proteins already identified in chicken eggshell matrix (ovotransferrin, ovalbumin-related X, ovalbumin-related Y, ovocalyxin-25, clusterin, ovomucin, vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1, ovostatin, ovoglobulin G2, prominin-1-A, α2-macroglobulin, and aminopeptidase N) were detected (Table 2). Finally, the angiotensin-converting enzyme precursor (ACE) was also identified.

To confirm EDIL3 proteomic identification, we performed Western blotting analysis on various samples: unfractioned UF (complete), EV fraction of UF (EV fraction), depleted UF (ØEV), and soluble eggshell proteins (SEP) (Fig. 5, A and B). We also carried out immunoblotting for milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (MFGE8), because it is another protein potentially involved in guiding EVs during shell mineralization (27). Immunoreactive bands in the vesicle fractions were observed using both antibodies (anti-EDIL3 and anti-MFGE8). Using anti-EDIL3 antibodies, a unique immune band was observed around 60-kDa (54-kDa predicted molecular mass), only in the EV fraction and SEP (Fig. 5A). MFGE8 exhibited a single band around 75-kDa (53-kDa predicted molecular mass) in all samples (Fig. 5B). The higher than predicted molecular mass observed for both EDIL3 and MFGE8 could be due to post-translational modification, such as glycosylation (27). An MFGE8 immunoband was detected in uterine fluid lacking vesicles, indicating that MFGE8 is soluble in uterine fluid, unlike EDIL3.

### Immunofluorescence in uterus for key proteins proposed for UF vesicular transport

Immunofluorescence analysis was performed on chicken uterus sections to localize six proteins (ANXA1, ANXA2, ANXA8, CA4, EDIL3, and PDCD6IP) proposed to play key roles in vesicular transport within the tissue responsible for eggshell mineralization (Fig. 6). Analyses were performed at five defined time points in the eggshell mineralization process. Time points at 5 and 6 h p.o. correspond to the massive accumulation of ACC at the earliest stages of shell formation. At 7 h p.o., ACC is progressively transformed in calcite aggregates, whereas calcite crystals with preferential orientation are fusing at 10 h p.o. to form the compact palisade layer strongly deposited at 16 h p.o. Negative controls demonstrated the absence of nonspecific signals in uterus for all antibodies. EDIL3 and ANXA1 protein levels were maximum at 5 and 6 h p.o., when massive ACC is deposited and then decreased from 7 to 16 h p. o. (Fig. 6). EDIL3 is present in the tubular glands of the lamina propria, whereas ANXA1 was localized to the epithelium. A faint immunostaining was obtained for ANXA2 at 5 h p.o., whereas the signal was stronger at 6, 7, and 10 h p.o. in the epithelium (Fig. 6), then decreased at 16 h p.o. ANXA8 was
<caption>**Table 1**

Normalized vesicular mRNA levels in the four oviduct regions and other tissues</caption>

Messenger RNA level results are reported as mean ± S.D. Messenger RNA level was assessed during the active growth phase of eggshell mineralization at 10 h.p.o. except for B at 18 h.p.o. Following reverse transcription, the mRNA level was quantified using primers designed with Primer-blast tool of NCBI (RRID:SCR_003095) and validated for the Biomark microfluidic system (BMK-M-96.96; Fluidigm). Relative quantification was normalized with eight housekeeping genes using GenNorm software. Superscript letters "a" to "e" correspond to significance results of the ANOVA-Tukey tests with "a" the letter corresponding to the highest level of mRNA for each gene. Tibial bone, *B*; duodenum, *D*; kidney, *K*; liver, *L*; magnum, *Ma*; white isthmus, *WI*; red isthmus, *RI*; uterus, *Ut*. The gene accession numbers and primer sequences are compiled in Table S3.

<table><thead><tr><th rowspan="3">Function</th><th rowspan="3">Gene</th><th colspan="10">Oviduct segments</th></tr><tr><th colspan="10">Tissues</th></tr><tr><th>B</th><th>D</th><th>K</th><th>L</th><th>Ma</th><th>WI</th><th>RI</th><th>Ut</th><th>ANOVA<br>p value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Calcium channel</td><td>Anxa1</td><td>0.205 ± 0.200<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.002 ± 0.001<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.009 ± 0.004<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.001<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.194 ± 0.066<sup>cd</sup></td><td>2.190 ± 0.749<sup>bc</sup></td><td>3.338 ± 0.768<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.891 ± 0.320<sup>c</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Anxa2</td><td>0.307 ± 0.240<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.521 ± 0.180<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.006 ± 0.009<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.002<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.543 ± 0.340<sup>cd</sup></td><td>1.208 ± 0.805<sup>bc</sup></td><td>2.884 ± 1.247<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.904 ± 0.459<sup>ab</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Anxa5</td><td>0.431 ± 0.359</td><td>0.401 ± 0.289</td><td>0.189 ± 0.173</td><td>1.462 ± 0.828</td><td>2.001 ± 2.920</td><td>0.560 ± 0.298</td><td>1.405 ± 1.044</td><td>0.298 ± 0.193</td><td>0.068</td></tr><tr><td>Anxa6</td><td>2.116 ± 1.522<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.446 ± 0.282<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.313 ± 0.163<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.473 ± 0.558<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.328 ± 1.140<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.478 ± 0.375<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.347 ± 0.147<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.543 ± 0.437<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><td>Anxa7</td><td>0.206 ± 0.081<sup>cd</sup></td><td>1.436 ± 0.306<sup>b</sup></td><td>7.074 ± 1.170<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.191 ± 0.059<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.623 ± 0.330<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.676 ± 0.410<sup>bcd</sup></td><td>1.122 ± 0.284<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.450 ± 0.526<sup>b</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Bicarbonate supplier/transporter</td><td>Anxa8</td><td>0.026 ± 0.029<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.001<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.001<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.001<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.669 ± 0.922<sup>bc</sup></td><td>2.513 ± 1.205<sup>ab</sup></td><td>3.958 ± 1.720<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.979 ± 0.344<sup>cd</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Anxa11</td><td>0.214 ± 0.044</td><td>0.562 ± 0.152</td><td>0.644 ± 0.293</td><td>0.916 ± 0.939</td><td>3.760 ± 6.150</td><td>2.180 ± 3.080</td><td>1.615 ± 1.436</td><td>1.008 ± 0.647</td><td>0.236</td></tr><tr><td>Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td>21.440 ± 10.270<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.585 ± 1.127<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.633 ± 0.834<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.512 ± 0.157<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.763 ± 0.196<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.149 ± 0.297<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.561 ± 0.171<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.131 ± 0.394<sup>b</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Scl4a7</td><td>0.115 ± 0.039<sup>cd</sup></td><td>1.905 ± 0.665<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.069 ± 0.008<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.012 ± 0.007<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.454 ± 0.149<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.551 ± 0.287<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.078 ± 0.262<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.529 ± 0.120<sup>c</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Membrane organizer</td><td>Cd82</td><td>0.634 ± 0.345<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.769 ± 0.310<sup>bcd</sup></td><td>0.367 ± 0.241<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.162 ± 0.141<sup>d</sup></td><td>1.598 ± 0.970<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.943 ± 0.260<sup>abcd</sup></td><td>1.270 ± 0.403<sup>abc</sup></td><td>1.865 ± 0.834<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Cd9</td><td>0.085 ± 0.100<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.258 ± 0.129<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.403 ± 0.168<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.053 ± 0.068<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.751 ± 1.255<sup>b</sup></td><td>12.900 ± 4.98<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.780 ± 0.323<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.617 ± 1.106<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.039</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Chaperone</td><td>Hsp90b1</td><td>2.427 ± 1.776<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.941 ± 0.672<sup>c</sup></td><td>3.230 ± 3.500<sup>a</sup></td><td>5.250 ± 3.920<sup>a</sup></td><td>4.560 ± 4.650<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.649 ± 0.760<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.627 ± 0.659<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.992 ± 0.840<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Hsp8a</td><td>0.562 ± 0.125<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.840 ± 0.203<sup>bcd</sup></td><td>1.180 ± 0.334<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.404 ± 0.151<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.973 ± 0.249<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.919 ± 0.287<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.709 ± 0.399<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.084 ± 0.205<sup>b</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Adhesion molecule</td><td>Hgb1</td><td>1.925 ± 0.947<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.345 ± 0.084<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.671 ± 0.491<sup>abc</sup></td><td>0.133 ± 0.064<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.827 ± 0.961<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.536 ± 0.826<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.783 ± 1.054<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.396 ± 0.504<sup>abc</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Edl3</td><td>0.019 ± 0.017<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.000 ± 0.000<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.001 ± 0.003<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.000 ± 0.000<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.000 ± 0.000<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.825 ± 0.303<sup>c</sup></td><td>1.101 ± 0.737<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.737 ± 0.464<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Intracellular trafficking</td><td>Mig8</td><td>0.514 ± 0.380<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.114 ± 0.078<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.856 ± 0.208<sup>c</sup></td><td>4.373 ± 1.223<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.029 ± 0.063<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.803 ± 0.399<sup>c</sup></td><td>2.139 ± 1.194<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.381 ± 0.385<sup>c</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Rab11a</td><td>0.399 ± 0.125<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.575 ± 6.00<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.993 ± 0.110<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.506 ± 0.079<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.110 ± 0.201<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.703 ± 0.130<sup>bcd</sup></td><td>0.952 ± 0.076<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.116 ± 0.226<sup>b</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Rab27a</td><td>0.381 ± 0.168<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.329 ± 0.197<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.585 ± 0.283<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.185 ± 0.144<sup>c</sup></td><td>2.306 ± 1.363<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.778 ± 0.517<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.090 ± 0.485<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.742 ± 0.634<sup>ab</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Rab5a</td><td>0.525 ± 0.353<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.779 ± 0.251<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.784 ± 0.324<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.780 ± 0.422<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.701 ± 0.881<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.337 ± 0.500<sup>abc</sup></td><td>1.294 ± 0.300<sup>abc</sup></td><td>1.649 ± 0.596<sup>ab</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Rab7a</td><td>1.879 ± 0.849</td><td>1.399 ± 0.781</td><td>0.991 ± 0.381</td><td>1.016 ± 0.500</td><td>1.375 ± 0.523</td><td>1.258 ± 0.335</td><td>1.353 ± 0.377</td><td>1.509 ± 0.354</td><td>0.297</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">EV biogenesis</td><td>Ralb</td><td>0.987 ± 0.257<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.034 ± 0.658<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.350 ± 0.587<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.191 ± 0.484<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.679 ± 0.939<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.615 ± 0.371<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.644 ± 0.438<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.349 ± 0.203<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.039</td></tr><tr><td>Vep</td><td>1.116 ± 0.495<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.414 ± 0.136<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.707 ± 0.259<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.129 ± 0.802<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.379 ± 1.746<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.071 ± 0.350<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.229 ± 0.469<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.334 ± 0.519<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.027</td></tr><tr><td>Arf6</td><td>0.597 ± 0.141<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.688 ± 0.490<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.770 ± 0.201<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.702 ± 0.360<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.647 ± 0.255<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.453 ± 0.194<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.949 ± 0.305<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.206 ± 0.370<sup>ab</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Sdcbp</td><td>0.581 ± 0.203<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.920 ± 0.225<sup>cd</sup></td><td>2.398 ± 0.326<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.546 ± 0.210<sup>d</sup></td><td>2.585 ± 1.130<sup>a</sup></td><td>2.506 ± 0.629<sup>ab</sup></td><td>2.013 ± 0.386<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.567 ± 0.422<sup>bc</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Tsg101</td><td>0.134 ± 0.018<sup>e</sup></td><td>0.510 ± 0.136<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.764 ± 0.180<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.386 ± 0.056<sup>de</sup></td><td>1.206 ± 0.385<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.900 ± 0.224<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.088 ± 0.134<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.192 ± 0.184<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">EV release</td><td>Vps26a</td><td>0.447 ± 0.271<sup>de</sup></td><td>0.831 ± 0.186<sup>cd</sup></td><td>1.078 ± 0.147<sup>bcd</sup></td><td>0.466 ± 0.183<sup>de</sup></td><td>1.203 ± 0.419<sup>abcd</sup></td><td>1.754 ± 0.338<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.937 ± 0.657<sup>a</sup></td><td>1.417 ± 0.771<sup>abc</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Pdcd6ip</td><td>0.213 ± 0.047<sup>e</sup></td><td>1.150 ± 0.225<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.727 ± 0.156<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.493 ± 0.109<sup>de</sup></td><td>0.777 ± 0.332<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.842 ± 0.303<sup>cd</sup></td><td>1.454 ± 0.301<sup>b</sup></td><td>2.030 ± 0.545<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Signaling protein</td><td>Vamp3</td><td>0.439 ± 0.224<sup>de</sup></td><td>0.575 ± 0.088<sup>bc</sup></td><td>0.365 ± 0.124<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.156 ± 0.080<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.682 ± 0.190<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.751 ± 0.122<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.117 ± 0.253<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.749 ± 0.134<sup>b</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Vps4b</td><td>0.014 ± 0.010<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.590 ± 0.281<sup>de</sup></td><td>1.527 ± 0.542<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.019 ± 0.019<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.052 ± 0.029<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.198 ± 0.242<sup>abc</sup></td><td>1.407 ± 0.552<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.704 ± 0.373<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Ywhaz</td><td>Ap1g1</td><td>0.613 ± 0.163<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.649 ± 0.154<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.509 ± 0.097<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.334 ± 0.185<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.028 ± 0.022<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.028 ± 0.022<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.029 ± 0.017<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.090 ± 0.069<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Ywhah</td><td>0.338 ± 0.089<sup>abcd</sup></td><td>0.517 ± 0.310<sup>abcd</sup></td><td>0.171 ± 0.104<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.136 ± 0.050<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.824 ± 0.539<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.726 ± 0.404<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.083 ± 0.260<sup>ab</sup></td><td>1.199 ± 0.465<sup>ab</sup></td><td>0.030</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Ywhoz</td><td>0.485 ± 0.200<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.501 ± 0.152<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.507 ± 0.131<sup>cd</sup></td><td>0.136 ± 0.050<sup>d</sup></td><td>0.660 ± 0.266<sup>c</sup></td><td>0.786 ± 0.159<sup>bc</sup></td><td>1.071 ± 0.683<sup>b</sup></td><td>1.089 ± 0.562<sup>a</sup></td><td>0.872 ± 0.568<sup>abc</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.192 ± 0.291<sup>b</sup></td><td>0.212 ± 0.394<sup>a</sup></td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Heat map of vesicular mRNA levels in the four oviduct segments (Ma, WI, RI, and Ut) and four tissues (B, bone; D, duodenum; K, kidney; L, liver). Z-score range was colored from blue (−2 Row, Z-Score, low mRNA level) to white (0 Row, Z-Score, intermediate mRNA level) and to red (2 Row, Z-score, high mRNA level). Gene accessions and primers are reported in Table S3.</figcaption></figure>

detected in both tubular glands and epithelium regions at each stage of mineralization, with a maximum signal at 10 h p.o. (Fig. 6). A strong CA4 signal was observed in the epithelial cells at 5 h, at 6 h when massive accumulation of ACC occurred, and at 7 h p.o. when a dissolution process allowed ACC transformation in calcite, whereas the signal was low at 16 h p.o. PDCD6IP immunofluorescence revealed that the protein was largely localized in the epithelium throughout the biomineralization process (5 to 16 h p.o.) (Fig. 6).

## Discussion

### Vesicles in hen oviduct

EVs are defined as phospholipid-enclosed nanoparticles (30–2000 nm) that carry a complex and variable cargo of biological contents including proteins and nucleic acids (36). EVs have been categorized as exosomes (30-150 nm) released by exocytosis, apoptotic bodies (50-5000 nm) released at the later stages of cell apoptosis, and shedding microvesicles or ectosomes (100-1000 nm) secreted by outward budding of the plasma membrane (42). Diverse biological functions have been ascribed to EVs, which vary according to the parental cell from which they were derived and the local microenvironment (36). Indeed, EVs have been implicated in numerous processes, such

as tissue formation, as well as in pathological conditions, including vascular calcification and many forms of cancer (36). They have been isolated from many biological fluids and recent reviews highlight their biological significance for intercellular communication and during pathological (43–48).

Recently, EVs have been reported to play potential roles in preserving sperm function within the hen genital tract and mediate interaction with sperm (49). Avian species have sperm reservoirs called sperm storage tubules (SST), which are mainly located in the mucosa of the utero-vaginal junction. Exosomes were observed both at the surface epithelium and inside SST using EM. Moreover, exosomes have been isolated from the avian uterine fluid and then observed using EM (49).

The role of vesicles in the transport of mineralizing ions during biomineralization has been reported in both invertebrate and vertebrate systems. The most documented vesicular mediated mineralization systems are in vertebrate skeleton and teeth, for which vesicles associated with calcium phosphate have been described (40, 41, 50). However, vesicular-mediated calcium carbonate mineralization has only been reported in invertebrates. Sea urchin spicules are the best documented example of invertebrate calcite biomineralization mediated by
EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<caption>**Table 2**

List of the 29 proteins identified by nanoLC-MS/MS analysis in uterine fluid EVs</caption>

The EV fraction was purified from uterine fluid (UF) collected at 9 h p.o.

<table><thead><tr><th>No.</th><th>Identified proteins</th><th>Symbols</th><th>GenBank accession number</th><th>Gene ID</th><th>Theoretical molecular mass</th><th>Normalized weighted spectra</th><th>emPAI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Cluster of ovalbumin</td><td>OVA</td><td>AUD54558.1</td><td>396058</td><td>43 kDa</td><td>1 031.10</td><td>29.909</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Cluster of ovotransferrin</td><td>OVOT</td><td>P02789.2</td><td>396241</td><td>78 kDa</td><td>560</td><td>8.219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Cluster of ovomucin</td><td>MUC</td><td>NP_989992.1</td><td>395381</td><td>234 kDa</td><td>448.91</td><td>0.82205</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Cluster of α2-macroglobulin-like</td><td>A2M</td><td>XP_025007673.1</td><td>418254</td><td>158 kDa</td><td>288</td><td>0.89983</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>Cluster of ovomacroglobulin (ovostatin)</td><td>OVST</td><td>CAA55385.1</td><td>396151</td><td>164 kDa</td><td>215</td><td>0.47326</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Ig μ chain C region</td><td>NA<sup>a</sup></td><td>P01875.2</td><td>NA</td><td>48 kDa</td><td>210</td><td>2.499</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Immunoglobulin α heavy chain</td><td>NA</td><td>AAB22614.2</td><td>NA</td><td>62 kDa</td><td>70</td><td>0.96212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>Ig light chain</td><td>NA</td><td>AAA48859.1</td><td>416928</td><td>25 kDa</td><td>63</td><td>0.88882</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Ovalbumin-related Y</td><td>OVAL-Y</td><td>BAM13279.1</td><td>420897</td><td>44 kDa</td><td>66</td><td>0.66086</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor</td><td>PIGR</td><td>AAQ14493.1</td><td>419848</td><td>71 kDa</td><td>71</td><td>0.31136</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>Ovoglobulin G2</td><td>OVOG2/TENP</td><td>BAM13270.1</td><td>395882</td><td>47 kDa</td><td>66</td><td>0.59817</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>Cluster of immunoglobulin light chain variable region</td><td>NA</td><td>AJQ23663.1</td><td>NA</td><td>11 kDa</td><td>42</td><td>0.87697</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>Cluster of anti-prostate specific antigen antibody immunoglobulin variable region</td><td>NA</td><td>AL×37966.1</td><td>NA</td><td>13 kDa</td><td>51</td><td>1.4661</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>Cluster of programmed cell death 6-interacting protein</td><td>PDCD6IP</td><td>XP_015137020.1</td><td>420725</td><td>97 kDa</td><td>46</td><td>0.16725</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>Cluster of immunoglobulin light chain variable region</td><td>N/A</td><td>AJQ23661.1</td><td>NA</td><td>11 kDa</td><td>34</td><td>1.2195</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>Cluster of lysozyme C</td><td>LYZ</td><td>P00698.1</td><td>396218</td><td>16 kDa</td><td>41</td><td>1.2327</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>Clusterin</td><td>CLU</td><td>NP_990231.1</td><td>395722</td><td>51 kDa</td><td>7</td><td>0.36338</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>Cluster of ovalbumin-related protein X</td><td>OVAL-X</td><td>NP_001263315.1</td><td>420898</td><td>44 kDa</td><td>16</td><td>0.35247</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td>Carbonic anhydrase 4</td><td>CA4</td><td>XP_415893.1</td><td>417647</td><td>36 kDa</td><td>23</td><td>0.5467</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>Cluster of ezrin</td><td>EZR</td><td>NP_990216.1</td><td>395701</td><td>69 kDa</td><td>13</td><td>0.20218</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td>Uncharacterized protein LOC771972 (OC×25)</td><td>OCX25</td><td>XP_001235178.3</td><td>771972</td><td>27 kDa</td><td>10</td><td>0.41449</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td>EGF-like repeat and discoidin I-like domain-containing protein 3</td><td>EDIL3</td><td>XP_424906.3</td><td>427326</td><td>54 kDa</td><td>12</td><td>0.2673</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td>Immunoglobulin heavy chain V-region</td><td>NA</td><td>AAA48830.1</td><td>NA</td><td>11 kDa</td><td>9</td><td>1.2444</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td>Cluster of syntenin-1</td><td>SDCBP</td><td>NP_001026195.1</td><td>421136</td><td>32 kDa</td><td>11</td><td>0.21673</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>Aminopeptidase N</td><td>AMPN</td><td>ACZ95799.1</td><td>395667</td><td>109 kDa</td><td>6</td><td>0.060894</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td>Cluster of immunoglobulin light chain variable region</td><td>NA</td><td>AJQ23760.1</td><td>NA</td><td>10 kDa</td><td>6</td><td>0.75959</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td>Prominin-1-A</td><td>PROM1</td><td>XP_004942263.1</td><td>423849</td><td>88 kDa</td><td>3</td><td>0.075475</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td>Angiotensin-converting enzyme precursor</td><td>ACE</td><td>NP_001161204.1</td><td>419953</td><td>147 kDa</td><td>5</td><td>0.044662</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td>Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1</td><td>VMO1</td><td>NP_001161233.1</td><td>418974</td><td>20 kDa</td><td>4</td><td>0.35873</td></tr></tbody></table>

<caption>**Table 3**

Proteins of the proposed ACC extracellular vesicle system detected by nanoLC-MS/MS analysis</caption>

Scaffold software in uterine fluid EVs. The EV fraction was purified from uterine fluid (UF) collected at 9 h p.o. The entire set of detected proteins is listed in Table 2 Indicated accessions correspond to the GenBank accession number. HCO₃⁻, bicarbonate ion. Vesiclepedia database (RRID:SCR_019011) classifies the proteins that are frequently identified in EVs. EV localization was predicted using molecular function of proteins on Uniprot (RRID:SCR_002380). References used were 31–34, 70–73, 75, and 77–86.

<table><thead><tr><th>Protein Name</th><th>GenBank accession number</th><th>Gene ID</th><th>Molecular mass</th><th>Proposed role in UF EVs</th><th>EV localization</th><th>Vesiclepedia rank</th><th>Bone/cartilage EV references</th><th>Eggshell/UF proteome references</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CA4</td><td>XP_415893.1</td><td>417647</td><td>36 kDa</td><td>HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> supplier</td><td>Membrane: glycosylphosphatidylinositol (glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored)</td><td>NA<sup>a</sup></td><td>NA</td><td>62, 67, 74, 76, 78</td></tr><tr><td>EDIL3</td><td>XP_424906.3</td><td>427326</td><td>54 kDa</td><td>Targeting protein</td><td>Membrane: phosphatidylserine-binding</td><td>NA</td><td>34</td><td>63, 65, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78</td></tr><tr><td>Ezrin</td><td>NP_990216.1</td><td>395701</td><td>69 kDa</td><td>Membrane fusion (plasma membrane-cytoskeleton linker)</td><td>Membrane: phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate-binding</td><td>30/100</td><td>33, 34, 35</td><td>62, 63, 74, 78</td></tr><tr><td>PDCD6IP</td><td>XP_015137020.1</td><td>420725</td><td>97 kDa</td><td>EV biogenesis</td><td>Lumen: incorporation</td><td>1/100</td><td>32, 33</td><td>62, 77, 78</td></tr><tr><td>Syntenin-1</td><td>NP_001026195.1</td><td>421136</td><td>32 kDa</td><td>EV biogenesis</td><td>Membrane: phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate-binding</td><td>19/100</td><td>32, 33, 34</td><td>62, 63, 64, 74, 75, 78</td></tr><tr><td>Ovalbumin</td><td>AUD54558.1</td><td>NA</td><td>43 kDa</td><td>ACC stabilization</td><td>Lumen: incorporation</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>62, 63, 65, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75, 76</td></tr><tr><td>Lysozyme C</td><td>P00698.1</td><td>396218</td><td>16 kDa</td><td>ACC stabilization</td><td>Lumen: incorporation</td><td>NA</td><td>34</td><td>62, 63, 65, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75, 76, 78</td></tr></tbody></table>

vesicles (6, 51). The involvement of vesicles was also proposed but not confirmed for molluscan shell formation (7) and coral exoskeletons (8).

### Eggshell mineralization and vesicular transport

Five to six g of calcium carbonate was deposited within an 18-h period during chicken egg formation. This requires rapid delivery of large amounts of calcium and carbonate, represent-

ing 10% (2 g) of hen total body calcium exported each day (24). Neither component (Ca²⁺ or HCO₃⁻) is stored in the uterus, but rather are continuously supplied during eggshell formation from the blood plasma via transport across the uterine glandular cells. Mechanisms of transepithelial transfer of calcium and bicarbonates have been widely studied and represent the current accepted model for eggshell mineralization (21, 24, 25). Recently, intestinal paracellular transfer of calcium during

<footnote>aNA, not applicable.</footnote>

<footnote>aNA, not applicable.</footnote>
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Western blotting analysis of (A) EDIL3 and (B) MFGE8 in UF: unfractionated UF (complete), depleted UF (ØEV), EV fraction of UF (EV fraction), and SEP. Proteins (15 µg) were subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and blotted for analysis. The membranes were probed with (A) rabbit polyclonal anti-EDIL3 (1:1,000, SAB2105802, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) and (B) rabbit synthetic anti-MFGE8 peptide (1:1,000, rabbit polyclonal; ProteoGenix, Schiltigheim). White arrowheads indicate the immunoreactive bands.</figcaption></figure>

eggshell formation was demonstrated (52), raising the possibility of paracellular transfer of calcium in uterus as well; however, no experimental data addressing this possibility is yet available. The vesicular transport of calcium as stabilized ACC is a third complementary pathway to transfer calcium and carbonate to the calcification site.

Shell calcification, which takes place in a saturated milieu (uterine fluid) (53), is initiated with the accumulation of ACC deposits on the eggshell membranes during 5–7 h p.o. (26). We have recently proposed a novel model for avian eggshell biomineralization involving EVs budding from uterine epithelial cells, which transit through the UF and deliver stabilized ACC mineral to the eggshell membranes and mineralization front (29). One attractive advantage of this mechanism is that non-specific precipitation in the fluid cannot occur. In this study, we report additional experimental support for this model. We demonstrate the presence of EVs containing ACC in UF, and we define some of the molecular actors involved in this process (Fig. 7). Moreover, we observed vesicles from 100 to 500 nm in the uterine cell cytoplasm and their accumulation at the apical membranes. We also observed budding from uterine cells to secrete these vesicles into uterine fluid. The size of vesicles observed in both fluid and uterine cells, and their outward budding, confirmed that EVs similar to shedding microvesicles or ectosomes are present. Secretory activity of multivesicular bodies has been described at the hen utero-vaginal junction, where spermatozoa are preserved in specialized glands (54). Therefore, the distinct oviduct segments seem to use vesicles for different functions (i.e. sperm preservation and secretion of mineral precursors). Moreover, it is intriguing that 250-300–nm granules have been detected within the calcium reserve body sac of the mineralized mammillary cones (55), which could correspond to trapped mineralization-specific EVs.

This study also gives new important insight on the stabilization and delivery of ACC to the mineralization site where the final structure of eggshell is completed. The avian eggshell is a highly ordered structure, consisting of a porous bioceramic

resulting from the sequential deposition of calcium carbonate and organic matrix in the red isthmus/uterus regions of the distal oviduct (15, 17, 23, 56–58). Eggshell mineralization results from the aggregation of ACC particles and their transformation into calcite crystals to allow a very rapid and controlled process. Additionally, ACC, which is highly unstable under physiological conditions, must be stabilized in this milieu. In the present study, both EELS and EDS spectroscopy confirmed the presence of calcium carbonate mineral deposits within the vesicles. Furthermore, selected area electron diffraction confirmed the amorphous nature of calcium carbonate. Intracellular vesicles containing ACC were previously observed inside sea urchin epithelial cells (6, 59, 60). In vertebrates, amorphous calcium phosphate has been observed *in vivo* inside intracellular vesicles in embryonic mouse osteoblasts (61). Extracellular vesicles with mineral were also reported for embryonic chick femur (62) and growth plate cartilage of chicken (63, 64). As an extension of these observations, we suggest that ACC is packaged inside vesicles when they are formed within the uterine cells. In other biomineralization models, it is known that intracellular calcium is stored in the endoplasmic reticulum (65). However, the subcellular source of ACC-containing EVs detected in our study remains unclear.

## Expression of vesicular transport actors

The experimental evidence from this study is summarized in a diagram of ACC vesicular transport to the mineralizing site, in which the main identified vesicular actors are incorporated (Fig. 7). Among the genes that we investigated, annexins can function as calcium channels (66–69), to enable uptake of the calcium ions required for intravesicular ACC formation. Three of them (*Anxa1*, -2 and -8) were highly expressed in the oviduct segments where eggshell calcification takes place (Ut and RI) (Fig. 8), and were overabundant at the initial phase of shell mineralization (5–10 h p.o.), compared with later stages. ANXA1 (21, 70), ANXA2 (21, 25, 71–73), and ANXA8 (70, 73) have been reported in chicken eggshell proteomic and transcriptomic surveys (70). ANXA1, ANXA2, and ANXA8 could bind to EV membranes via their phospholipid-binding domain (74). These three annexins constitute, therefore, excellent candidates as participants in vesicular transport, where they could mediate the entry and accumulation of calcium.

Bicarbonate is a precursor for the calcium carbonate of avian eggshells, and consequently we investigated carbonic anhydrase 2 and 4 (CA2 and CA4) and sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 3 (SLC4A7), as bicarbonate suppliers in vesicular transport, because these have previously detected in uterine transcriptomes during eggshell calcification (21, 25). In our study, *Ca2* was not significantly overexpressed in tissues where the shell is mineralized (RI and Ut); however, we noted that CA4 was previously identified in chicken eggshell proteomes (70, 71, 75). We observed that *Ca4* was expressed in duodenum, kidney, and magnum, in addition to Ut where eggshell calcification occurs (Fig. 8). The presence of CA4 protein in the uterine epithelial cells was confirmed by immunofluorescence, and was overabundant at the onset of shell calcification compared with later stages. Finally, proteomic analysis of purified UF EVs
EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Immunofluorescence of ANXA1, ANXA2, ANXA8, EDIL3, CA4, and PDCD6IP in chicken uterus. The respective rows correspond to: A, co-staining of ANXA1 (red) and EDIL3 (green), B, staining of ANXA2 (green); C, staining of ANXA8 (green); D, staining of CA4 (green); and E, staining of PDCD6IP (green). ANXA1, ANXA2, and CA4 were localized in the epithelium. ANXA8 and PDCD6IP signals were observed in both epithelium and tubular glands of lamina propria. EDIL3 was solely detected in tubular glands. E, ciliated and glandular epithelium; L, lumen; LP, lamina propria; TG, tubular glands. The primary and secondary antibodies are compiled in Table S4. Bars, 100 µm. White arrowheads indicate positive signal in either tubular glands or epithelium.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Proposed vesicular function for the different genes and proteins investigated in the study. The EVs bud by exocytosis from the plasma membrane of the uterine cells. ANXA1, -2, -8, and CA4 supply calcium and bicarbonate ions, respectively (inside uterine cells or in the UF). The EVs transit the UF to deliver stabilized ACC to the mineralization sites. The passage of EV-encapsulated ACC avoids nonspecific precipitation in the UF and provides stabilized ACC to the mineralization sites. OVA and LYZ stabilize ACC inside vesicles. EDIL3 (in bold), and to a lesser extent MFGE8, guide the EVs by targeting calcium to the mineralization front. The rest of the proteins are involved in EV biology (biogenesis, intracellular transport, and release). The genes in bold represent proteins identified in our proteomic and/or immunofluorescence analyses. Elements were from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.</figcaption></figure>

confirmed that CA4 is present in vesicles. CA4 is a glycosyl-
phosphatidylinositol-linked protein (76), and could be anch-
ored to the outside of vesicle membranes and catalyze the re-

versible hydration of CO₂ into HCO₃⁻ at this location. We
propose that the CA4-catalyzed accumulation of high levels of
bicarbonate in proximity to the vesicular stores of Ca would
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** mRNA levels of annexins (ANX) and CA4. A, *Anxa1*, *Anxa2*, and *Anxa8* mRNA levels. Following reverse transcription, mRNA level was quantified using the Biomark microfluidic system (BMK-M-96.96; Fluidigm); *n* = 6. Relative quantification was normalized with eight housekeeping genes using GenNorm software. B, *Ca4* RT-PCR (100-bp DNA ladder). mRNA level was assessed during the active growth phase of mineralization 10 h p.o. except for *B* at 18 h p.o. Tibial bone, *B*; duodenum, *D*; kidney, *K*; liver, *L*; magnum, *Ma*; white isthmus, *Wi*; red isthmus; *Ri*; uterus, *Ut*; H₂O, negative control; *Std*, size (bp) of DNA ladder (100-bp); *n* = 2. *Letters at the top* indicate statistically significant differences in ANXs mRNA levels between the tissues (ANOVA-Tukey). The gene accession numbers and primers are compiled in Table S3. GraphPad Prism software was used for diagram representation.</figcaption></figure>

promote the formation of intravesicular ACC. SLC4A7 is a sodium bicarbonate cotransporter containing transmembrane domains (RRID:SCR_002380), which was identified in matrix vesicles released from mineralizing human osteoblast-like cells (34). Although SLC4A7 expression was detected in chicken uterus by RNA-Seq (https://anr.fr/Projet-ANR-13-BSV6-0007), in this study we observed that it was not significantly overexpressed in RI and Ut.

We also quantified the mRNA levels of numerous additional vesicle markers within uterine epithelial cells. Among the 20 vesicular genes highly expressed in RI and Ut, seven encode proteins ranked in the top 100 of EV protein markers by Vesiclepedia (Table S2). These seven proteins encoded by *Pcdcd6ip*, *Hspa8*, *Anxa2*, *Ywhaz*, *Sdcbp*, *Tsg101*, and *Anxa1* are, respectively, reported to rank 1st, 3rd, 5th, 13th, 19th, 39th, and 43rd by Vesiclepedia (39), and were previously reported as constituents of the avian eggshell proteome (Table S2) (70–73, 77–86). Moreover, 12 vesicular genes (*Anxa1*, *Anxa2*, *Cd82*, *Edil3*,

*Hspa8*, *Pcdcd6ip*, *Rab5a*, *Sdcbp*, *Tsg101*, *Vamp7*, *Ywhah*, and *Ywhaz*) encode proteins previously detected in exosomes or matrix vesicles of bone cells, mineralizing cartilage or articular cartilage (Table S2) (31–34, 87). The 20 genes that are highly expressed in oviduct segments responsible for eggshell mineralization encode proteins that have been incorporated into our eggshell vesicular transport model (Fig. 7, Table S2). Some are involved in the general functioning of EVs such as vesicle formation and/or trafficking. Indeed, the genes *Pcdcd6ip*, *Sdcbp*, *Tsg101*, and *Vps26a* encode proteins involved in the biogenesis of EVs (32, 35–38). Proteins encoded by *Rab5a*, *Rab27a*, *Vamp7*, *Vamp3*, and *Vps4b* participate in membrane fusion/vesicle release (32, 35, 36, 38). *Ywhah* and *Ywhaz* encode signaling proteins (32), whereas *Hspa8* and *Cd82* encode chaperone and membrane organizer proteins, respectively (32, 36, 38). Our proteomics analysis also confirmed the presence of programmed cell death 6-interacting protein (PDCD6IP) and syntenin-1 (*Sdcbp*) in purified vesicles (Tables 2 and 3). Syntenin-1 (*Sdcbp*) is a signaling protein and a biogenesis factor described as an extracellular vesicle marker in Vesiclepedia (RRID:SCR_019011). In addition, immunofluorescence for PDCD6IP revealed its presence at each stage and at higher levels during the earliest stage. PDCD6IP is a biogenesis factor for EVs, and is the most frequently reported extracellular vesicles marker (Vesiclepedia). Ezrin is another common EV marker, which is involved in plasma membrane/cytoskeleton cross-linkage during vesicle formation (39, 88); it is present in uterine fluid EVs (Table 3). The biogenesis factor, syntenin-1 (*Sdcbp*), and ezrin could be attached to EV membrane via their phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate-binding sites (Table 3). PDCD6IP, syntenin-1, and ezrin have been previously identified in bone and cartilage EVs (31–33).

In our previous study, we proposed a role for EDIL3 and MFGE8 in targeting vesicles containing ACC cargo to the mineralization site (27). EDIL3 and MFGE8 are the 6th and 34th most abundant eggshell proteins, respectively (71). EDIL3 was previously identified in the proteome of cartilage EVs (33). In this study, we identified EDIL3 in purified EVs (Tables 2 and 3), and demonstrated its vesicle specificity by Western blotting (Fig. 5A). EDIL3 is synthesized by the tubular glands of the uterus (Fig. 6) and could bind to vesicles via its phosphatidylserine-binding domain. In addition, EDIL3 was more abundant during the initiation of mineralization (5-10 h p.o., Fig. 6) when massive ACC deposits are detected (71). Concerning MFGE8, which is paralogous to EDIL3, we observe a high expression of its mRNA in RI compared with other tissues; only liver exhibits a higher mRNA level (27). MFGE8 was not detected in our proteomic analysis of EVs, although Western blotting revealed its presence in UF and to a lesser extend in EVs (Fig. 5B). Altogether, these results strongly suggest that EDIL3 is a key protein in EVs at the initiation stage of eggshell biomineralization, whereas an EV-specific role for MFGE8 is unlikely.

## ACC stabilization

We propose two main hypotheses to explain the presence of stabilized ACC in uterine EVs, which are not mutually exclusive. First, accumulation of ACC in the interior of an EV may be
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

sufficient to ensure its stabilization, as reported in *vitro* for ACC nanoparticles stabilized in liposomes (89, 90). In this case, the membrane coats ACC and shields it from bulk water; reduced water content in the ACC milieu is sufficient to delay crystallization (91, 92). Under encapsulated conditions, the initial ACC remains isolated from the aqueous milieu and is observed to dehydrate to the more stable anhydrous ACC phase (90). Moreover, magnesium and phosphate ions, which are present in uterine fluid and in eggshell mineral, are also reported to enhance the stability of ACC and to delay its crystallization (91–93). Physicochemical vesicular conditions could therefore be a key element for ACC stabilization in uterine fluid EVs during eggshell biomineralization.

An alternative hypothesis incorporates additional molecules to thermodynamically stabilize the transient ACC phase (26). Indeed, previous studies have shown that organic matrix components of sea urchin spicules, coral skeleton, or mollusk shell can stabilize ACC (94–96). Moreover, ACC was observed using cryo-EM inside the vesicles of the sea urchin cells involved in spicule mineralization (59, 60). In this context, we paid particular attention to LYZ and OVA that were identified in our proteomic study (Tables 2 and 3), and were previously reported in chicken eggshell (70, 75, 77–79, 81, 97) and shown to modify calcium carbonate precipitation and calcite crystal morphology in vitro (98, 99). The role of LYZ in the stabilization of ACC has been explored but remains controversial. Only high concentrations of LYZ alter the morphology of calcite crystals in vitro, and LYZ is ineffective in the stabilization of ACC particles (99). However, metastable ACC was obtained in vitro in the presence of chicken egg white lysozyme C (100, 101). Lysozyme markedly decreased the average diameter of metastable ACC particles and promoted a network of associated particles that incorporated the protein into the precipitate (100). Additionally, lysozyme-ACC particles transform exclusively into the crystalline calcite polymorph (100, 101).

OVA is an abundant eggshell matrix protein, and its role in calcium carbonate formation and ACC stabilization has been investigated (98, 102–105). Calcium binds to OVA and this accumulation creates a nucleation center for mineral formation (105). Calcium ions are bound to the protein by complexation through acidic groups leading to protein rearrangement (97). The calcium cations are the starting points for the subsequent formation of ACC nuclei, which then undergo a series of phase transitions to the stable crystalline polymorphs (104). OVA stabilizes the unstable calcium carbonate phases in vitro (105, 106). Therefore, the presence of OVA in vesicles will contribute to the formation of metastable ACC (Table 3, Fig. 7).

We also identified about 20 additional proteins in UF EVs by proteomics (Table 2). Ovotransferrin can modify calcite crystal morphology in vitro at low concentrations (107). α2-Macroglobulin, another protein identified in our study (Table 2), is an egg yolk protein able to interact with low-density lipoprotein, which exhibits calcium binding properties and consequently could interact with ACC (RRID:SCR_002380) (18, 108). Ovomucin (MUC), ovomacroglobulin (ovostatin, OVST), and ovoglobulin G2 (TENP or OVOG2) are egg white proteins, whereas vitelline membrane outer layer protein (VMO1) is a protein enriched in the vitelline membrane (Table 2) (109). They were

previously identified in eggshell (70, 71), but their role related to the calcification process is unknown. Clusterin is a chaperone protein previously identified in eggshell and proposed to prevent the premature aggregation and precipitation of eggshell matrix proteins during calcification (110). Aminopeptidase N and Loc 771972 (OCX25) are a protease and protease inhibitor, respectively (15, 111), which were also detected in vesicles (Table 2). Protease and protease inhibitors could potentially control the calcification process, either by degrading proteins or by modifying the processing of protein maturation (71). Prominin-1-A (PROM1), a protein involved in lipid metabolism was also present in vesicles but its role is not yet defined. Finally, nine EV proteins are partial Igs, with unknown functions in vesicles or in shell mineralization.

## Conclusions

In the present study, we provide evidence for the first time in vertebrates of a vesicular transport pathway for delivery of stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate mineral particles. We used multiple approaches to confirm predictions based on this model. TEM coupled to spectroscopic analyses demonstrated several phases of EV formation at uterine cells, as well as the presence of EVs containing ACC mineral deposits in the UF. The major actors involved in this vesicular transport were organized into a comprehensive schema (Fig. 7), which incorporates EVs and constituent proteins in the process of shell mineralization. EDIL3 is a targeting protein that is proposed to address vesicles for delivery of ACC to the mineralization site. Calcium accumulation by vesicles is promoted by annexins 1, 2, and 8, whereas carbonic anhydrase 4 catalyzes bicarbonate formation from CO2. Moreover, our study identified and characterized several additional proteins that could contribute to the stabilization of ACC inside vesicles, under favorable physical and chemical conditions.

## Experimental procedures

### Ethical statement and housing

All animal-handling protocols were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Council Directives concerning the practice for the care and use of animals for Scientific Purposes and the French Ministry on Animal experimentation, and were performed under the supervision of authorized scientists (authorization number 7323, delivered by the French Ministry of Education and Research). Birds were kept in the experimental unit PEAT 1295 of INRA, which has permission to rear birds and to perform euthanasia of experimental animals (decree number B37-175-1 of August 28th 2012 delivered by the “Préfecture d’Indre et Loire” following inspection by the Direction of Veterinary Services). Our experimental protocol was approved by the ethical committee “Comité d’éthique de Val de Loire, officially registered under number 19 of the French National Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation” under agreement number 16099-015902.

Mature brown egg-laying hens (ISA-Hendrix, 40 and 90 weeks old at sampling) were kept in individual cages furnished with automatic equipment for recording of the oviposition (egg-laying) times. Animals were fed layer mash *ad libitum* and
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

exposed to a 14-h light/10-h darkness cycle. Following collection and removal of egg contents, the eggshells were thoroughly washed with water, air dried, and stored at -20°C.

### Tissue and uterine fluid collection

Thirty-two brown laying hens (ISA-Hendrix, 26 and 6 at 40 and 90 weeks old, respectively) were sacrificed by lethal intravenous injection of Dolethal® (Vetoquinol, Magny-vernois, France) at the initial phase of eggshell mineralization (5-7 h p.o.), the onset of the active mineralization phase (10 h p.o.), or during the linear growth phase of rapid mineralization (16-18 h p.o.).

For RT-PCR and Western blotting analyses, various tissues (duodenum, D; kidney, K; liver, L) and oviduct regions (Ma, WI, RI, and Ut) were collected from 40-week-old hens sacrificed at 10 h p.o., whereas mid-shaft tibial bones (B) were collected at 18 h p.o from 90-week-old hens. Oviduct epithelium samples were obtained by scraping the inner surface. Mid-shaft tibial bone samples were cleaned of muscle but were not flushed of marrow; duodenum tissues were directly cleaned by immersion in physiological saline. Liver was collected from the right lobe. After that, tissues were directly immersed in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80°C in cryo-tubes until RNA or protein extraction.

Small pieces of uterine wall (0.5 cm²) were also sampled at 16 h p.o. from 40-week-old hens for EM, and were fixed by incubation at room temperature for 24 h in 4% paraformaldehyde, 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3). Fixed tissues were stored at 4°C until preparation of sections.

For immunofluorescence analysis, small pieces (2 × 0.4 cm) of the uterus at each stage (5, 6, 7, 10, and 16 h p.o.), from 25 hens at 40 weeks old, were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound mounting medium for cryosectioning (VWR, Radnor, USA) using molds and direct immersion in isopentane cooled by liquid nitrogen. The blocks of optimal cutting temperature containing uterus pieces were stored at -80°C until cryosectioning.

UF was collected as previously described (20). Briefly, egg expulsion was induced by injection of 50 µg of prostaglandin-F2α in the alar vein of 40-week-old hens, either at 9 or 16 h p.o. Following egg expulsion, UF was collected directly by gravity in a plastic tube placed at the entrance of the everted vagina. A portion of the fluid was promptly pipetted and deposited in liquid nitrogen to obtain 50-µl beads of uterine fluid for storage at -80°C until use for electron microscopy. The remaining UF was diluted in PBS (PBS, 4:1, v/v) in cryotubes maintained on ice and immediately used for extracellular vesicle isolation.

### mRNA levels

Total RNA was extracted from tissues harvested at 10 h p.o. (except bone, which was extracted at 18 h p.o.), and treated as previously described (27). Briefly, the concentration of each RNA sample was measured at 260 nm with NanoDrop™ and their integrity was assessed on 1.5% agarose gels. Total RNA samples (1 µg) were reverse-transcribed using RNase H-Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Superscript II, Invitrogen) and Oligo(dT)™ primers (Invitrogen). Primers for

the Edil3, Mfge8, Ca4, the 31 vesicular genes, and the eight housekeeping genes (B2m, Eif3i, Gapdh, Gusb, Stag2, Tbp, Sdha, and Ppia) were designed from G. gallus gene sequences (Table S3), using Primer-BLAST on National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and were synthesized (Eurogentec, Lièges, Belgium). Primer efficiencies were evaluated by RT-qPCR using LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master and LightCycler® 480 instrument II (Roche, Bâle, Switzerland). mRNA level was quantified using the Biomark microfluidic system, in which every sample-gene combination were quantified using a 96.96 Dynamic Array™ IFCs (BMK-M-96.96, Fluidigm®, San Francisco, CA) at the GeT-GenoToul platform (Toulouse, France). Samples were pre-amplified according to the manufacturer's specifications. PCR was then performed using the following thermal protocols: thermal mix (50°C, 2 min; 70°C, 30 min; 25°C, 10 min), hot start (50°C, 2 min; 95°C, 10 min), 35 PCR cycles (95°C, 15 s; 60°C, 60 s), and melting analysis (60°C, 30 s; 95°C, 1°C/3 s). Real time-quantitative PCR results were analyzed using Fluidigm Real-time PCR analysis software version 4.1.3 (RRID:SCR_015686). Six biological replicates and two technical replicates were carried out for each tissue. GenNorm software (RRID:SCR_006763) was used for validation of housekeeping gene stability. The normalized quantities were calculated using the following formula: (gene efficiency(cocalibrator-ctsample))/geometric average quantity of the eight housekeeping genes. Normalized quantities were compared between various measured tissues and oviduct segments using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey pairwise test analysis on Minitab® 18 software (RRID:SCR_014483). A *p* value <0.05 was selected as the threshold for significance between different groups. The heat map of the mRNA levels (Row-Z score) in different tissues for Edil3, Mfge8, and the 31 vesicular genes was computed using the heatmap.2 function from gplots packages of Rstudio software 1.1.456 (RRID:SCR_000432). Row and column clustering were performed using Pearson-ward.D2 methods and Spearman-Ward.D2 methods, respectively.

The Ca4 mRNA was amplified by end point PCR in each oviduct segment and tissues using DreamTaq PCR Master Mix 2 × (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and Mastercycler gradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). After 3 min of denaturation, 35 cycles were used (95°C, 30 s; 60°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s) to amplify PCR products, followed by a final elongation for 15 min. PCR products were then mixed with Trackit cyan/orange Loading buffer 6 times (ThermoFisher Scientific), loaded on a 2.5% agarose gel, and migrated for 30 min at 100 V using the Mupid-One electrophoresis system (Dominique Dutscher, Issy-les-mouligneaux, France). The Trackit 100-bp DNA ladder was used (ThermoFisher Scientific) to determine the size of PCR products. Imaging was performed using the Syngene GeneGenius Gel Light Imaging System (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).

### Extracellular vesicle isolation from uterine fluid and extraction of soluble eggshell matrix proteins

EVs were isolated from uterine fluid harvested at 9 and 16 h p.o., using previously described methodology (112). Briefly, UF
## EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

diluted in PBS was centrifuged at 100 × g for 15 min and then at 12,000 × g for 15 min to remove cell debris. Two successive ultracentrifugation steps at 100,000 × g (Beckman Coulter L8-70M, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) were then performed during 90 min to pellet the EVs. Aliquots of the supernatants corresponding to UF without EVs were sampled and stored at -20°C. The pellet was suspended in 50 µl of PBS and stored at -20°C until TEM, nanoLC-MS/MS, and Western blotting analysis.

SEP from normally laid eggs were extracted as previously detailed (107). Briefly, eggshell pieces with eggshell membranes were immersed in 154 mM NaCl containing protease inhibitors (2.5 mM benzamidine-HCl, 50 mM ε-amino-*n*-caproic acid, 0.5 mM *N*-ethymaleimide, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and then ground into a fine powder. Eggshell powders were fully demineralized by immersion in 20% acetic acid, and the resulting suspensions were dialyzed (cutoff 3,500 Da; dialysis membrane Spectra/Por™, ThermoFisher Scientific) against demineralized water for 24 h at 4°C and lyophilized. Powdered samples were incubated overnight at 4°C in 4 M guanidine-HCl, 5 mM benzamidine-HCl, 0.1 M ε-amino-*n*-caproic acid, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium acetate, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and then dialyzed (cutoff 3, 500 Da) against 0.5 M sodium acetate (pH 7.4) for 24 h at 4°C, followed by centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting SEP (supernatants) were stored at -20°C.

### Electrophoresis and Western blotting analyses

Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay kit II (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la Coquette, France) in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and using BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) as standard. Fifteen micrograms of each sample were diluted into Laemmli sample buffer (51, v/v) and boiled for 5 min. Protein samples were then separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels (Mini-Protean II electrophoresis cell, Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and transferred to 0.2 µM nitrocellulose blotting membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) for Western blotting analysis. Briefly, membranes were washed 5 min in TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), blocked with the Odyssey® blocking buffer (LI-COR, Bad Homburg, Germany) in TBS (1:1, v/v), and then incubated for 3 h in the blocking solution (Odyssey® blocking buffer/TBS, 1:1, v/v) containing 0.1% Tween-20 and anti-EDIL3 (1:1,000) or anti-MFGE8 antibodies (1:1,000) (Table S4). Membranes were sequentially washed for 5 min in TBS, 0.1% Tween-20, and then incubated for 1 h in the blocking solution containing 0.1% Tween-20 and AlexaFluor® 680 goat anti-rabbit (H + L) secondary antibody (1:20,000; ThermoFisher Scientific) (Table S4). Finally, membranes were washed three times in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 and twice in TBS. Immunoreactive bands were revealed using the Odyssey® imaging system (LI-COR, Bad Homburg, Germany) at 700 nm.

### Immunofluorescence of uterine tissue

Serial sections (10 µM) were prepared from uterus embedded in optimal cutting temperature (harvested at 5, 6, 7, 10, and 16 h p.o.) using the CM3050 S cryostat (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

Sections (stored at -80°C until use) were thawed for 30 min at room temperature and rehydrated during 5 min in 1× PBS before immunolabeling. The blocking step was performed with 1× PBS, 3% BSA for 20 min at room temperature. Sections were then incubated in 1× PBS, 3% BSA with diluted primary antibodies (anti-ANXA1, anti-ANXA2, anti-ANXA8, anti-CA4, anti-EDIL3, or anti-PDCD6IP, Table S4). Sections were washed 3 times at room temperature for 5 min in 1× PBS. Negative controls were prepared without primary antibody. Sections were washed 3 times for 5 min at room temperature in 1× PBS. Then, according to the primary antibody, sections were incubated with either goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (IgG, H + L), AlexaFluor® 488 (1:1,000; ThermoFisher Scientific) or goat anti-mouse IgG1 cross-adsorbed secondary antibody, AlexaFluor® 555 (1:1,000; ThermoFisher Scientific) (Table S4) in 1× PBS, 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. All immunolabeling was performed on duplicate sections. Sections were washed three times for 5 min at room temperature and then mounted using Fluoroshield™ with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole histology mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). Sections were observed with Axioplan II Fluorescence Microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and images were acquired using an INFINITY microscope camera (Lumenera, Nepean, Canada).

### Proteomics analysis of uterine fluid extracellular vesicles

Sixty micrograms of purified EVs resuspended in PBS were diluted into 2% SDS Laemmli sample buffer (5:1, v/v) and boiled for 5 min. EV proteins were electrophoresed on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel (50 V, 30 min) to obtain a single band (Mini-Protean II electrophoresis cell, Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The gel was stained with Coomassie Blue and the single band of proteins was excised and subjected to in-gel digestion with bovine trypsin (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) as previously described by Marie et al. (84) for analysis by nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem MS (nanoLC-MS/MS). MS/MS ion searches were performed using Mascot search engine version 2.6 (Matrix Science, London, UK) via Proteome Discoverer 2.1 software (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) against the NCBIprot_chordata database (July 2018). The search parameters included trypsin as a protease with two allowed missed cleavages, carbamidometh-y lcysteine, methionine oxidation, and acetylation of protein N termini as variable modifications. The tolerance of the ions was set to 5 ppm for parent and 0.8 Da for fragment ion matches. Mascot results obtained from the target and decoy databases searches were subjected to Scaffold software (version 4.8.8, Proteome Software, Portland, OR) using the protein cluster analysis option (assemblage of proteins into clusters based on shared peptide evidence). Peptide and protein identifica-tions were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability as specified by the Peptide Prophet algorithm and by the Protein Prophet algorithm, respectively. Protein identifications were accepted if they contained at least two identified peptides.
# EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

## Transmission EM and electron energy loss spectroscopy analyses of uterine fluid

Frozen beads of UF harvested at 16 h p.o. were deposited on copper TEM grids and dried for 1 min. Excess UF was then absorbed with filter paper and the grid was immediately observed with the TEM-ZEISS LIBRA 120 instrument (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). EVs were localized under the TEM and EELS spectra from 270 to 410 eV and from 460 to 600 eV were acquired (Table S1). Mapping of elemental calcium (345-355 eV) and carbon (280-290 eV) were performed to determine the spatial distribution of CaCO₃ and organic carbon in EVs.

## Transmission EM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses of uterus and uterine fluid

Fixed pieces of uterus were washed in PBS and post-fixed by incubation with 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Samples were then fully dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and embedded in Epon resin, which was polymerized by heating from 37 to 60 °C. Ultra-thin sections (50–70 nm thick) of these blocks were obtained with a LEICA Ultracut UCT ultramicrotome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections were stained with 5% uranyl acetate, 5% lead citrate, and observations were made with a TEM-1400 Plus electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

UF harvested at 16 h p.o. and stored as frozen beads was deposited on a TEM grids (C coated) and then dried for 1 min. Excess UF was then absorbed with filter paper, stained with uranyl acetate 2%, and the grid was immediately observed with a TEM-1400 Plus electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). EVs were observed under the TEM (BF/DF detector) and EDS (Oxford 65 mm² detector) analysis was performed on EVs to detect elemental calcium, carbon, and oxygen (AZtec software). SAED patterns were registered to determine the crystallinity of mineral deposits observed within EVs.

## Data availability

All data are contained within the manuscript.

**Acknowledgments**—We are grateful to the experimental unit (PEAT, INRAE, 2018, Poultry Experimental Facility) for the care of birds, the GeT-GenoToul platform Toulouse for performing real time-quantitative PCR with the Biomark Fluidigm system, and Centro de Instrumentación Científica de la Universidad de Granada for electron microscopy and spectroscopic analysis. We acknowledge Pierre-Ivan Raynal and Sonia Georgeault from the IBiSA electron microscopy platform of the "Université François Rabelais" of Tours for their assistance. We also acknowledge Nadine Gérard, Cindy Riou, and Agostinho Alcantara-Neto from UMR "Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements" (INRAE Centre Val de Loire) for their help in extracellular vesicle isolation.

**Author contributions**—L. S., N. L. R., M. T. H., and J. G. conceptualization; L. S., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., and L. C.-S. resources; L. S., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., L. C.-S., and M. T. H. formal analysis; L. S., N. L. R., J. E., and J. G. supervision; L. S. and J. G. funding acquisition; L. S., N. L. R., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., L. C.-S., M. T. H.,

and J. G. validation; L. S., N. L. R., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., L. C.-S., M. T. H., and J. G. investigation; L. S. and J. G. visualization; L. S., N. L. R., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., L. C.-S., M. T. H., and J. G. methodology; L. S. writing-original draft; L. S. and J. G. project administration; L. S., N. L. R., J. E., A. B. R.-N., V. L., L. C.-S., M. T. H., and J. G. writing-review and editing; V. L. and L. C.-S. software.

**Funding and additional information**—This work was supported by the Université François Rabelais de Tours and the Région Centre Val de Loire (to L. S.), NSERC Grant RGPIN-2016-04410 and Le STUDIUM and is a Le STUDIUM Research Fellow, Loire Valley Institute for Advanced Studies, Orleans-Tours, and BOA, INRAE, Centre Val de Loire, Nouzilly, France (to M. T. H.).

**Conflict of interest**—The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

**Abbreviations**—The abbreviations used are: ACC, amorphous calcium carbonate; B, bone; CaCO₃, calcium carbonate; D, duodenum; EDS, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; EELS, electron energy loss spectroscopy; EV, extracellular vesicle; K, kidney; L, liver; Ma, magnum; p.o., post-ovulation; RI, red isthmus; SAED, selected area electron diffraction; SEP, soluble eggshell proteins; SST, sperm storage tubules; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; UF, uterine fluid; Ut, uterus; WI, white isthmus; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme precursor; PDCD6IP, programmed cell death 6-interacting protein; ANOVA, analysis of variance; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EDX, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; EDIL3, EGF-like repeat and discoidin I-like domain-containing protein 3; EZR, ezrin; LYZ, lysozyme C; OVA, ovalbumin; CA4, carbonic anhydrase-4.

## References

1. Lowenstam, H. A., and Weiner, S. (1989) *On Biomineralization*, Oxford University Press, New York

2. Ziegler, A. (1994) Ultrastructure and electron spectroscopic diffraction analysis of the sternal calcium deposits of *Porcellio scaber* Latr (isopoda, crustacea). *J. Struct. Biol.* **112**, 110–116 *CrossRef*

3. Brečević, L., and Nielsen, A. E. (1989) Solubility of amorphous calcium-carbonate. *J. Crystal Growth* **98**, 504–510 *CrossRef*

4. Addadi, L., Raz, S., and Weiner, S. (2003) Taking advantage of disorder: Amorphous calcium carbonate and its roles in biomineralization. *Adv. Materials* **15**, 959–970 *CrossRef*

5. Aizenberg, J., Lambert, G., Weiner, S., and Addadi, L. (2002) Factors involved in the formation of amorphous and crystalline calcium carbonate: a study of an ascidian skeleton. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **124**, 32–39 *CrossRef*

6. Beniash, E., Addadi, L., and Weiner, S. (1999) Cellular control over spicular formation in sea urchin embryos: a structural approach. *J. Struct. Biol.* **125**, 50–62 *CrossRef*

7. Addadi, L., Joester, D., Nudelman, F., and Weiner, S. (2006) Mollusk shell formation: a source of new concepts for understanding biomineralization processes. *Chemistry* **12**, 980–987 *CrossRef*

8. Bahn, S. Y., Jo, B. H., Choi, Y. S., and Cha, H. J. (2017) Control of nacre biomineralization by Pif80 in pearl oyster. *Sci. Adv.* **3**, e1700765 *CrossRef*

9. Mass, T., Giuffre, A. J., Sun, C. Y., Stifler, C. A., Frazier, M. J., Neder, M., Tamura, N., Stan, C. V., Marcus, M. A., and Gilbert, P. (2017) Amorphous calcium carbonate particles form coral skeletons. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **114**, E7670–E7678 *CrossRef*

10. Weiner, S., and Dove, P. M. (2003) An overview of biomineralization processes and the problem of the vital effect. *Biomineralization* **54**, 1–29 *CrossRef*
11. Levi-Kalisman, Y., Raz, S., Weiner, S., Addadi, L., and Sagi, I. (2002) Structural differences between biogenic amorphous calcium carbonate phases using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. *Adv. Funct. Materials* **12**, 43–48 *CrossRef*

12. Claramunt, S., and Cracraft, J. (2015) A new time tree reveals Earth history's imprint on the evolution of modern birds. *Sci. Adv.* **1**, e150105 *CrossRef*

13. Hincke, M. T., Da Silva, M., Guyot, N., Gautron, J., McKee, M. D., Guabiraba-Brito, R., and Réhault-Godbert, S. (2019) Dynamics of structural barriers and innate immune components during incubation of the avian egg: critical interplay between autonomous embryonic development and maternal anticipation. *J. Innate Immun.* **11**, 111–124 *CrossRef Medline*

14. Nys, Y., Hincke, M. T., Arias, J. L., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M., and Solomon, S. E. (1999) Avian eggshell mineralization. *Poultry Avian Biol. Rev.* **10**, 143–166

15. Nys, Y., Hincke, M. T., Hernandez-Hernandez, A., Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., Gomez-Morales, J., Jonchere, V., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M., and Gautron, J. (2011) Eggshell ultrastructure, properties and the process of mineralization: involvement of organic matrix in the eggshell fabric. *Productions Animales* **23**, 143–154 *CrossRef*

16. Arias, J. L., Fink, D. J., Xiao, S. Q., Heuer, A. H., and Caplan, A. I. (1993) Biomineralization and eggshells: cell-mediated acellular compartments of mineralized extracellular matrix. *Int. Rev. Cytol.* **145**, 217–250 *CrossRef Medline*

17. Nys, Y., Gautron, J., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M., and Hincke, M. T. (2004) Avian eggshell mineralization: biochemical and functional characterization of matrix proteins. *Comptes Rendus Palevol.* **3**, 549–562 *CrossRef*

18. Nys, Y., and Guyot, N. (2011) Egg formation and chemistry. In *Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg Products* (Nys, Y., Bain, M., and Van Immerseel, F., eds) pp. 83–132, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

19. Nys, Y., and Gautron, J. (2007) Structure and formation of the eggshell. In *Bioactive Egg Compounds* (Huopalahti, R., López-Fandiño, R., Anton, M., and Schade, R., eds) pp. 99–102, Springer, Berlin

20. Gautron, J., Hincke, M. T., and Nys, Y. (1997) Precursor matrix proteins in the uterine fluid change with stages of eggshell formation in hens. *Connect. Tissue Res.* **36**, 195–210 *CrossRef Medline*

21. Jonchère, V., Brionne, A., Gautron, J., and Nys, Y. (2012) Identification of uterine ion transporters for mineralisation precursors of the avian eggshell. *BMC Physiol.* **12**, 10 *CrossRef Medline*

22. Jonchère, V., Réhault-Godbert, S., Hennequet-Antier, C., Cabau, C., Sibut, V., Cogburn, L. A., Nys, Y., and Gautron, J. (2010) Gene expression profiling to identify eggshell proteins involved in physical defense of the chicken egg. *BMC Genomics* **11**, 57 *CrossRef Medline*

23. Hincke, M. T., Nys, Y., Gautron, J., Mann, K., Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., and McKee, M. D. (2012) The eggshell: structure, composition and mineralization. *Front. Biosci.* **17**, 1266–1280 *CrossRef Medline*

24. Nys, Y., and Le Roy, N. (2018) Calcium homeostasis and eggshell biomineralization in female chicken. In *Vitamin D* (Feldman, D., ed) 4 Ed., pp. 361–382, Academic Press, Cambridge

25. Brionne, A., Nys, Y., Hennequet-Antier, C., and Gautron, J. (2014) Hen uterine gene expression profiling during eggshell formation reveals putative proteins involved in the supply of minerals or in the shell mineralization process. *BMC Genomics* **15**, 220 *CrossRef Medline*

26. Rodríguez-Navarro, A. B., Marie, P., Nys, Y., Hincke, M. T., and Gautron, J. (2015) Amorphous calcium carbonate controls avian eggshell mineralization: a new paradigm for understanding rapid eggshell calcification. *J. Struct. Biol.* **190**, 291–303 *CrossRef Medline*

27. Stapane, L., Le Roy, N., Hincke, M. T., and Gautron, J. (2019) The glycoproteins EDIL3 and MFGE8 regulate vesicle-mediated eggshell calcification in a new model for avian biomineralization. *J. Biol. Chem.* **294**, 14526–14545 *CrossRef Medline*

28. DeVol, R. T., Metzler, R. A., Kabalah-Amitai, L., Pokroy, B., Politi, Y., Gal, A., Addadi, L., Weiner, S., Fernandez-Martinez, A., Demichelis, R., Gale, J. D., Ihli, J., Meldrum, F. C., Blonsky, A. Z., Killian, C. E., et al. (2014) Oxygen spectroscopy and polarization-dependent imaging contrast (PIC)-mapping of calcium carbonate minerals and biominerals. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **118**, 8449–8457 *CrossRef Medline*

29. Garvie, L. A. J., Craven, A. J., and Brydson, R. (1995) Use of electron-energy-loss near-edge fine-structure in the study of minerals. *Am. Mineralogist* **80**, 1132–1425 *CrossRef*

30. Macías-Sánchez, E., Willinger, M. G., Pina, C. M., and Checa, A. G. (2017) Transformation of ACC into argonite and the origin of the nano-granular structure of nacre. *Sci. Rep.* **7** *CrossRef*

31. Balcerzak, M., Malinowska, A., Thouverey, C., Sekrecka, A., Dadlez, M., Buchet, R., and Pikula, S. (2008) Proteome analysis of matrix vesicles isolated from femurs of chicken embryo. *Proteomics* **8**, 192–205 *CrossRef Medline*

32. Shapiro, I. M., Landis, W. J., and Risbud, M. V. (2015) Matrix vesicles: are they anchored exosomes? *Bone* **79**, 29–36 *CrossRef Medline*

33. Rosenthal, A. K., Gohr, C. M., Ninomiya, J., and Wakim, B. T. (2011) Proteomic analysis of articular cartilage vesicles from normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. *Arthritis Rheum.* **63**, 401–411 *CrossRef*

34. Thouverey, C., Malinowska, A., Balcerzak, M., Strzelecka-Kiliszek, A., Buchet, R., Dadlez, M., and Pikula, S. (2011) Proteomic characterization of biogenesis and functions of matrix vesicles released from mineralizing human osteoblast-like cells. *J. Proteomics* **74**, 1123–1134 *CrossRef Medline*

35. Colombo, M., Raposo, G., and Théry, C. (2014) Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. *Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.* **30**, 255–289 *CrossRef Medline*

36. Azidis, I., Cox, S. C., and Davies, O. G. (2018) The role of extracellular vesicles in biomineralisation: current perspective and application in regenerative medicine. *J. Tissue Eng.* **9**, 2041731418810130 *CrossRef Medline*

37. Hessvik, N. P., and Llorente, A. (2018) Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. *Cell. Mol. Life Sci.* **75**, 193–208 *CrossRef Medline*

38. Van Niel, G., D'Angelo, G., and Raposo, G. (2018) Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. *Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.* **19**, 213–228 *CrossRef Medline*

39. Pathan, M., Fonseka, P., Chitti, S. V., Kang, T., Sanwlani, R., Van Deun, J., Hendrix, A., and Mathivanan, S. (2019) Vesiclepedia 2019: a compendium of RNA, proteins, lipids and metabolites in extracellular vesicles. *Nucleic Acids Res.* **47**, D516–D519 *CrossRef Medline*

40. Hasegawa, T., Yamamoto, T., Tsuchiya, E., Hongo, H., Tsuboi, K., Kudo, A., Abe, M., Yoshida, T., Nagai, T., Khadiza, N., Yokoyama, A., Oda, K., Ozawa, H., de Freitas, P. H. L., Li, M., et al. (2017) Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization. *Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev.* **53**, 34–45 *CrossRef Medline*

41. Golub, E. E. (2009) Role of matrix vesicles in biomineralization. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1790**, 1592–1598 *CrossRef Medline*

42. Kalra, H., Drummen, G. P. C., and Mathivanan, S. (2016) Focus on extracellular vesicles: introducing the next small big thing. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **17**, 170 *CrossRef Medline*

43. Barreiro, K., and Holthofer, H. (2017) Urinary extracellular vesicles: a promising shortcut to novel biomarker discoveries. *Cell Tissue Res.* **369**, 217–227 *CrossRef Medline*

44. Basso, M., and Bonetto, V. (2016) Extracellular vesicles and a novel form of communication in the brain. *Front. Neurosci.* **10**, 127 *CrossRef*

45. Gho, Y. S., and Lee, C. (2017) Emergent properties of extracellular vesicles: a holistic approach to decode the complexity of intercellular communication networks. *Mol. Biosystems* **13**, 1291–1296 *CrossRef Medline*

46. Gho, Y. S., and Lee, J. (2019) Special issue on the role of extracellular vesicles in human diseases. *Exp. Mol. Med.* **51**, 1–2 *CrossRef Medline*

47. Kim, C. W., Lee, H. M., Lee, T. H., Kang, C. H., Kleinman, H. K., and Gho, Y. S. (2002) Extracellular membrane vesicles from tumor cells promote angiogenesis via sphingomyelin. *Cancer Res.* **62**, 6312–6317 *Medline*

48. Pomatto, M. A. C., Gai, C., Bussolati, B., and Camussi, G. (2017) Extracellular vesicles in renal pathophysiology. *Front. Mol. Biosci.* **4**, 37 *CrossRef Medline*

49. Riou, C., Brionne, A., Cordeiro, L., Harichaux, G., Gargaros, A., Labas, V., Gautron, J., and Gérard, N. (2020) Avian uterine fluid proteome: exosomes and biological processes potentially involved in sperm survival. *Mol. Reprod. Dev.* **87**, 454–470 *CrossRef Medline*
EV-packaged ACC for avian eggshell formation

50. Bottini, M., Mebarek, S., Anderson, K. L., Strzelecka-Kiliszek, A., Bozycki, L., Simão, A. M. S., Bolean, M., Ciancaglini, P., Pikula, J. B., Pikula, S., Magne, D., Volkmann, N., Hanein, D., Millán, J. L., and Buchet, R. (2018) Matrix vesicles from chondrocytes and osteoblasts: their biogenesis, properties, functions and biomimetic models. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1862**, 532–546 *CrossRef Medline*

51. Weiner, S., and Addadi, L. (2011) Crystallization pathways in biomineralization. *Annu. Rev. Materials Res.* **41**, 21–40 *CrossRef*

52. Gloux, A., Le Roy, N., Brionne, A., Bonin, E., Juanchich, A., Benzoni, G., Piketty, M. L., Prié, D., Nys, Y., Gautron, J., Narcy, A., and Duclos, M. J. (2019) Candidate genes of the transcellular and paracellular calcium absorption pathways in the small intestine of laying hens. *Poultry Sci.* **98**, 6005–6018 *CrossRef Medline*

53. Nys, Y., Zawadzki, J., Gautron, J., and Mills, A. D. (1991) Whitening of brown-shelled eggs: mineral composition of uterine fluid and rate of protoporphyrin deposition. *Poultry Sci.* **70**, 1236–1245 *CrossRef Medline*

54. Waqas, M. Y., Yang, P., Ahmed, N., Zhang, Q., Liu, T., Li, Q., Hu, L., Hong, C., and Chen, Q. (2016) Characterization of the ultrastructure in the uterovaginal junction of the hen. *Poultry Sci.* **95**, 2112–2119 *CrossRef Medline*

55. Chien, Y. C., Hincke, M. T., and McKee, M. D. (2009) Ultrastructure of avian eggshell during resorption following egg fertilization. *J. Struct. Biol.* **168**, 527–538 *CrossRef Medline*

56. Hincke, M. T., Nys, Y., and Gautron, J. (2010) The role of matrix proteins in eggshell formation. *J. Poultry Sci.* **47**, 208–219 *CrossRef*

57. Gautron, J., and Nys, Y. (2007) Function of eggshell matrix proteins. In *Bioactive Egg Compounds* (Huopalahti, R., López-Fandiño, R., Anton, M., and Schade, R., eds) pp. 109–115, Springer, Berlin

58. Gautron, J. (2019) Proteomics analysis of avian eggshell matrix proteins: toward new advances on biomineralization. *Proteomics* **19**, 1900120 *CrossRef*

59. Vidavsky, N., Addadi, S., Mahamid, J., Shimoni, E., Ben-Ezra, D., Shpigel, M., Weiner, S., and Addadi, L. (2014) Initial stages of calcium uptake and mineral deposition in sea urchin embryos. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **111**, 39–44 *CrossRef Medline*

60. Vidavsky, N., Masic, A., Schertel, A., Weiner, S., and Addadi, L. (2015) Mineral-bearing vesicle transport in sea urchin embryos. *J. Struct. Biol.* **192**, 358–365 *CrossRef Medline*

61. Mahamid, J., Sharir, A., Gur, D., Zelzer, E., Addadi, L., and Weiner, S. (2011) Bone mineralization proceeds through intracellular calcium phosphate loaded vesicles: a cryo-electron microscopy study. *J. Struct. Biol.* **174**, 527–535 *CrossRef Medline*

62. Gay, C. V., Schraer, H., and Hargest, T. E. (1978) Ultrastructure of matrix vesicles and mineral in unfixed embryonic bone. *Metab. Bone Dis. Relat. Res.* **1**, 105–108 *CrossRef*

63. Wu, L. N., Yoshimori, T., Genge, B. R., Sauer, G. R., Kirsch, T., Ishikawa, Y., and Wuthier, R. E. (1993) Characterization of the nucleosomal core complex responsible for mineral induction by growth plate cartilage matrix vesicles. *J. Biol. Chem.* **268**, 25084–25094 *Medline*

64. Anderson, H. C., Garimella, R., and Tague, S. E. (2005) The role of matrix vesicles in growth plate development and biomineralization. *Front. Biosci.* **10**, 822–837 *CrossRef*

65. Khalifa, G., Kahil, K., Addadi, L., and Weiner, S. (2018) Calcium ion and mineral pathways in biomineralization: a perspective. In *Biomineralization: from Molecular and Nano-structural Analyses to Environmental Science* (Endo, K., Kogure, T., and Nagasawa, H., eds) pp. 97–103, Springer, Singapore

66. Rojas, E., Arispe, N., Haigler, H. T., Burns, A. L., and Pollard, H. B. (1992) Identification of annexins as calcium channels in biological-membranes. *Bone Miner.* **17**, 214–218 *CrossRef Medline*

67. Wuthier, R. E., and Lipscomb, G. F. (2011) Matrix vesicles: structure, composition, formation and function in calcification. *Front. Bioscience* (Landmark) **16**, 2812–2902 *CrossRef Medline*

68. Cao, X., Genge, B. R., Wu, L. N., Buzzi, W. R., Showman, R. M., and Wuthier, R. E. (1993) Characterization, cloning and expression of the 67-kDa annexin from chicken growth plate cartilage matrix vesicles. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **197**, 556–561 *CrossRef Medline*

69. Arispe, N., Rojas, E., Genge, B. R., Wu, L. N., and Wuthier, R. E. (1996) Similarity in calcium channel activity of annexin V and matrix vesicles in planar lipid bilayers. *Biophys. J.* **71**, 1764–1775 *CrossRef Medline*

70. Mann, K., Macek, B., and Olsen, J. V. (2006) Proteomic analysis of the acid-soluble organic matrix of the chicken calcified eggshell layer. *Proteomics* **6**, 3801–3810 *CrossRef Medline*

71. Marie, P., Labas, V., Brionne, A., Harichaux, G., Hennequet-Antier, C., Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., Nys, Y., and Gautron, J. (2015) Quantitative proteomics provides new insights into chicken eggshell matrix protein functions during the primary events of mineralisation and the active calcification phase. *J. Proteomics* **126**, 140–154 *CrossRef Medline*

72. Sun, C., Xu, G., and Yang, N. (2013) Differential label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of avian eggshell matrix and uterine fluid proteins associated with eggshell mechanical property. *Proteomics* **13**, 3523–3536 *CrossRef Medline*

73. Cordeiro, C. M. M., and Hincke, M. T. (2016) Quantitative proteomics analysis of eggshell membrane proteins during chick embryonic development. *J. Proteomics* **130**, 11–25 *CrossRef Medline*

74. Gerke, V., and Moss, S. E. (2002) Annexins: from structure to function. *Physiol. Rev.* **82**, 331–371 *CrossRef Medline*

75. Rose-Martel, M., Smiley, S., and Hincke, M. T. (2015) Novel identification of matrix proteins involved in calcitic biomineralization. *J. Proteomics* **116**, 81–96 *CrossRef Medline*

76. Hassan, M. I., Shajee, B., Waheed, A., Ahmad, F., and Sly, W. S. (2013) Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes. *Bioorg. Med. Chem.* **21**, 1570–1582 *CrossRef Medline*

77. Rose-Martel, M., Du, J. W., and Hincke, M. T. (2012) Proteomic analysis provides new insight into the chicken eggshell cuticle. *J. Proteomics* **75**, 2697–2706 *CrossRef Medline*

78. Kaweewong, K., Garnjanagoonchorn, W., Jirapakkul, W., and Roytrakul, S. (2013) Solubilization and identification of hen eggshell membrane proteins during different times of chicken embryo development using the proteomic approach. *Protein J.* **32**, 297–308 *CrossRef Medline*

79. Mikšík, I., Sedláková, P., Lacinová, K., Pataridis, S., and Eckhardt, A. (2010) Determination of insoluble avian eggshell matrix proteins. *Anal. Bioanal. Chem.* **397**, 205–214 *CrossRef Medline*

80. Mann, K., and Mann, M. (2013) The proteome of the calcified layer organic matrix of turkey (*Meleagris gallopavo*) eggshell. *Proteome Sci.* **11**, 40 *CrossRef Medline*

81. Mikšík, I., Ergang, P., and Pácha, J. (2014) Proteomic analysis of chicken eggshell cuticle membrane layer. *Anal. Bioanal. Chem.* **406**, 7633–7640 *CrossRef Medline*

82. Mann, K. (2015) The calcified eggshell matrix proteome of a songbird, the zebra finch (*Taeniopygia guttata*). *Proteome Sci.* **13**, 29 *CrossRef Medline*

83. Mann, K., and Mann, M. (2015) Proteomic analysis of quail calcified eggshell matrix: a comparison to chicken and turkey eggshell proteomes. *Proteome Sci.* **13**, 22 *CrossRef Medline*

84. Marie, P., Labas, V., Brionne, A., Harichaux, G., Hennequet-Antier, C., Nys, Y., and Gautron, J. (2015) Quantitative proteomics and bioinformatic analysis provide new insight into protein function during avian eggshell biomineralization. *J. Proteomics* **113**, 178–193 *CrossRef Medline*

85. Ahmed, T. A., Suso, H. P., and Hincke, M. T. (2017) In-depth comparative analysis of the chicken eggshell membrane proteome. *J. Proteomics* **155**, 49–62 *CrossRef Medline*

86. Zhu, F., Zhang, F., Hincke, M., Yin, Z. T., Chen, S. R., Yang, N., and Hou, Z. C. (2019) iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of duck eggshell during biomineralization. *Proteomics* **19**, e1900011 *CrossRef Medline*

87. Xiao, Z., Camalier, C. E., Nagashima, K., Chan, K. C., Lucas, D. A., de la Cruz, M. J., Gignac, M., Lockett, S., Issaq, H. J., Veenstra, T. D., Conrads, T. P., and Beck, G. R., Jr. (2007) Analysis of the extracellular matrix vesicle proteome in mineralizing osteoblasts. *J. Cell. Physiol.* **210**, 325–335 *CrossRef Medline*

88. Blin, G., Margeat, E., Carvalho, K., Royer, C. A., Roy, C., and Picart, C. (2008) Quantitative analysis of the binding of ezrin to large unilamellar vesicles containing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. *Biophys. J.* **94**, 1021–1033 *CrossRef Medline*
89. Tester, C. C., Brock, R. E., Wu, C. H., Krejci, M. R., Weigand, S., and Joester, D. (2011) *In vitro* synthesis and stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) nanoparticles within liposomes. *Crystengcomm* **13**, 3975–3978 *CrossRef*

90. Ihli, J., Wong, W. C., Noel, E. H., Kim, Y. Y., Kulak, A. N., Christenson, H. K., Duer, M. J., and Meldrum, F. C. (2014) Dehydration and crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate in solution and in air. *Nat. Commun.* **5**, 3169 *CrossRef*

91. Albéric, M., Bertinetti, L., Zou, Z. Y., Fratzl, P., Habraken, W., and Politi, Y. (2018) The crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate is kinetically governed by ion impurities and water. *Adv. Sci.* **5**, 1701000 *CrossRef Medline*

92. Konrad, F., Purgstaller, B., Gallien, F., Mavromatis, V., Gane, P., and Dieitzel, M. (2018) Influence of aqueous Mg concentration on the transformation of amorphous calcium carbonate. *J. Crystal Growth* **498**, 381–390 *CrossRef*

93. Rodriguez-Blanco, J. D., Shaw, S., Bots, P., Roncal-Herrero, T., and Benning, L. G. (2012) The role of pH and Mg on the stability and crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate. *J. Alloys Compounds* **536**, S477–S479 *CrossRef*

94. Gong, Y. U. T., Killian, C. E., Olson, I. C., Appathurai, N. P., Amasino, A. L., Martin, M. C., Holt, L. J., Wilt, F. H., and Gilbert, P. U. P. A. (2012) Phase transitions in biogenic amorphous calcium carbonate. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **109**, 6088–6093 *CrossRef Medline*

95. Falini, G., Fermani, S., and Goffredo, S. (2015) Coral biomineralization: a focus on intra-skeletal organic matrix and calcification. *Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.* **46**, 17–26 *CrossRef Medline*

96. Politi, Y., Mahamid, J., Goldberg, H., Weiner, S., and Addadi, L. (2007) Asprich mollusk shell protein: *in vitro* experiments aimed at elucidating function in CaCO3 crystallization. *Crystengcomm* **9**, 1171–1177 *CrossRef*

97. Mikšík, I., Eckhardt, A., Sedláková, P., and Mikulikova, K. (2007) Proteins of insoluble matrix of avian (Gallus gallus) eggshell. *Connect Tissue Res.* **48**, 8 *CrossRef*

98. Dombre, C., Guyot, N., Moreau, T., Monget, P., Da Silva, M., Gautron, J., and Réhault-Godbert, S. (2017) Egg serpins: the chicken and/or the egg dilemma. *Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.* **62**, 120–132 *CrossRef Medline*

99. Hincke, M. T., Gautron, J., Panheleux, M., Garcia-Ruiz, J., McKee, M. D., and Nys, Y. (2000) Identification and localization of lysozyme as a component of eggshell membranes and eggshell matrix. *Matrix Biol.* **19**, 443–453 *CrossRef*

100. Voinescu, A. E., Touraud, D., Lecker, A., Pfitzner, A., Kunz, W., andNH- ham, B. W. (2007) Mineralization of CaCO3 in the presence of egg white lysozyme. *Langmuir* **23**, 12269–12274 *CrossRef Medline*

101. Wang, X. Q., Sun, H. L., Xia, Y. Q., Chen, C. X., Xu, H., Shan, H. H., and Lu, J. R. (2009) Lysozyme mediated calcium carbonate mineralization. *J. Colloid Interface Sci.* **332**, 96–103 *CrossRef Medline*

102. Hincke, M. T. (1995) Ovalbumin is a component of the chicken eggshell matrix. *Connect. Tissue Res.* **31**, 227–233 *CrossRef Medline*

103. Pipich, V., Balz, M., Wolf, S. E., Tremel, W., and Schwahn, D. (2008) Nucleation and growth of CaCO3 mediated by the egg-white protein ovalbumin: a time-resolved *in situ* study using small-angle neutron scattering. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **130**, 6879–6892 *CrossRef Medline*

104. Schwahn, D., Balz, M., and Tremel, W. (2004) Crystallization of the CaCO3 mineral in the presence of the protein ovalbumin. *Physica B Condensed Matter* **350**, E947–E949 *CrossRef*

105. Wang, X. Q., Wu, C. M., Tao, K., Zhao, K., Wang, J. Q., Xu, H., Xia, D. H., Shan, H. H., and Lu, J. R. (2010) Influence of ovalbumin on CaCO3 precipitation during *in vitro* biomineralization. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **114**, 5301–5308 *CrossRef Medline*

106. Wang, X., Kong, R., Pan, X., Xu, H., Xia, D., Shan, H., and Lu, J. R. (2009) Role of ovalbumin in the stabilization of metastable vaterite in calcium carbonate biomineralization. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **113**, 8975–8982 *CrossRef Medline*

107. Gautron, J., Hincke, M. T., Panheleux, M., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M., Boldicke, T., and Nys, Y. (2001) Ovotransferrin is a matrix protein of the hen eggshell membranes and basal calcified layer. *Connect. Tissue Res.* **42**, 255–267 *CrossRef Medline*

108. Mann, K., and Mann, M. (2008) The chicken egg yolk plasma and granule proteomes. *Proteomics* **8**, 178–191 *CrossRef Medline*

109. Guérin-Dubiard, C., Anton, M., Gautron, J., Nys, Y., and Nau, F. (2010) Composition de l'oeuf. In *Science et technologie de l'oeuf* (Nau, F., Guérin-Dubiard, C., Baron, F., and Thapon, J. L., eds) pp. 1–169, Lavoisier, Cachan

110. Mann, K., Gautron, J., Nys, Y., McKee, M. D., Bajari, T., Schneider, W. J., and Hincke, M. I. (2003) Disulfide-linked heterodimeric clusterin is a component of the chicken eggshell matrix and egg white. *Matrix Biol.* **22**, 397–407 *CrossRef Medline*

111. Gautron, J., and Nys, Y. (2007) Eggshell matrix proteins. In *Bioactive Egg Compounds* (Huopalahti, R., López-Fandiño, R., Anton, M., and Schade, R., eds) pp. 103–108, Springer, Berlin

112. Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G., and Clayton, A. (2006) Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. *Curr. Protocols Cell Biol.* **30**, 3.22.1–3.22.9 *CrossRef*

113. Wu, L. N., Genge, B. R., Sauer, G. R., and Wuthier, R. E. (1996) Characterization and reconstitution of the nucleational complex responsible for mineral formation by growth plate cartilage matrix vesicles. *Connect. Tissue Res.* **35**, 309–315 *CrossRef Medline*

114. Kirsch, T., and Claassen, H. (2000) Matrix vesicles mediate mineralization of human thyroid cartilage. *Calcif. Tissue Int.* **66**, 292–297 *CrossRef Medline*

115. Kirsch, T., Harrison, G., Golub, E. E., and Nah, H. D. (2000) The roles of annexins and types II and X collagen in matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization of growth plate cartilage. *J. Biol. Chem.* **275**, 35577–35583 *CrossRef Medline*

116. Kapustin, A. N., Davies, J. D., Reynolds, J. L., McNair, R., Jones, G. T., Sidibe, A., Schurgers, L. J., Skepper, J. N., Proudfoot, D., Mayr, M., and Shanahan, C. M. (2011) Calcium regulates key components of vascular smooth muscle cell-derived matrix vesicles to enhance mineralization. *Circ. Res.* **109**, e1–e12 *CrossRef Medline*

117. Cui, L., Houston, D. A., Farquharson, C., and MacRae, V. E. (2016) Characterisation of matrix vesicles in skeletal and soft tissue mineralisation. *Bone* **87**, 147–158 *CrossRef Medline*

118. Davies, O. G., Cox, S. C., Williams, R. L., Tsaroucha, D., Dorrepaal, R. M., Lewis, M. P., and Grover, L. M. (2017) Annexin-enriched osteoblast-derived vesicles act as an extracellular site of mineral nucleation within developing stem cell cultures. *Sci. Rep.* **7** *CrossRef*

119. Yang, K. T., Lin, C. Y., Liou, J. S., Fan, Y. H., Chiou, S. H., Huang, C. W., Wu, C. P., Lin, E. C., Chen, C. F., Lee, Y. P., Lee, W. C., Ding, S. T., Cheng, W. T. K., and Huang, M. C. (2007) Differentially expressed transcripts in shell glands from low and high egg production strains of chickens using cDNA microarrays. *Anim. Reprod. Sci.* **101**, 113–124 *CrossRef Medline*