# Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Comment on
"Farewell, HSJ!address from the retiring editor" by ZW
Kundzewicz

D. Koutsoyiannis, M. Acreman, A. Castellarin, H. H. G. Savenije, Christophe Cudennec, G. Bloeschl, G. Young, A. Montanari, F. Watkins

► To cite this version:

D. Koutsoyiannis, M. Acreman, A. Castellarin, H. H. G. Savenije, Christophe Cudennec, et al. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Comment on "Farewell, HSJ!address from the retiring editor" by ZW Kundzewicz. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2016, 61 (5), pp.803-804. 10.1080/02626667.2016.1150032. hal-01601911

HAL Id: hal-01601911

https://hal.science/hal-01601911

Submitted on 27 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Comment on “Farewell, HSJ!—address from the retiring editor” by Z.W. Kundzewicz

D. Koutsoyiannis, M. Acreman, A. Castellarin, H.H.G. Savenije, C. Cudennec, G. Blöschl, G. Young, A. Montanari & F. Watkins

**To cite this article:** D. Koutsoyiannis, M. Acreman, A. Castellarin, H.H.G. Savenije, C. Cudennec, G. Blöschl, G. Young, A. Montanari & F. Watkins (2016) Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Comment on “Farewell, HSJ!—address from the retiring editor” by Z.W. Kundzewicz, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61:5, 803-804, DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2016.1150032

**To link to this article:** http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1150032

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Published online: 02 Mar 2016.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Submit your article to this journal

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Article views: 278

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

View related articles

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

View Crossmark data

CrossMark
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

EDITORIAL

# Should auld acquaintance be forgot? Comment on "Farewell, HSJ!—address from the retiring editor" by Z.W. Kundzewicz

D. Koutsoyiannis<sup>a, h</sup>, M. Acreman<sup>a, i</sup>, A. Castellarin<sup>a, j</sup>, H.H.G. Savenije<sup>b, k</sup>, C. Cudennec<sup>c, l</sup>, G. Blöschl<sup>d, m</sup>, G. Young<sup>e, n</sup>, A. Montanari<sup>f, j</sup> and F. Watkins<sup>g, o</sup>

In his Farewell Editorial, Z.W. (Zbyszek) Kundzewicz (2015) provides a fascinating read, useful for older and younger hydrologists alike. It covers the history of *Hydrological Sciences Journal* (HSJ), official organ of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), not only during his long-lasting (18 years) service as Editor, but also in earlier times since its first issue was published in 1956. It focuses on the evolution of journal publications and the community behaviours during the last decades and also envisages the future of the journal based on past experience and lessons learned.

The period in which Zbyszek led HSJ was a transition and transformation period. From an era when the entire processing in the journal was based on postal services, HSJ moved to an intermediate period of email-based transactions and, more recently, has adapted to fully web-based processing. From the in-house publishing of a few issues per year it passed to the era of highly professional on-line and in-print publishing, in partnership with a commercial publisher (Taylor & Francis). From the early era when sometimes the submissions were not enough to fill the planned number of issues (4 per year), HSJ passed to a period of skyrocketing increase in the number of submissions, which demanded regular expansion of the journal to deal with the backlog of approved papers (this year 16 issues are planned).

These changes were driven by technological evolution in communication and printing, as well as by changes in community habits and behaviours—particularly the dominance in recent years of the “publish-or-perish” syndrome, or the importance given by individuals and institutions to bibliometric indices. Such developments indicate progress and show that the overall body of knowledge has increased dramatically (Blöschl et al. 2014). However, one should not neglect the negative consequences, the domination of quantity over quality and the preference for citation counts over

the essential impact of publications. As aptly expressed by Zbyszek, "A cynic may say that, these days, publications are not to be read, they are to be cited, to boost authors' careers."

It is also true that bibliometric indices "may grow in time, even after the death of the author (then such growth does not include self-citations)", as also noted by Zbyszek. In addition to the fine joke, this note offers an important message that an individual's scientific contribution may continue after his death. Contribution and recognition are tightly connected, sometimes with a time lag, and it is not uncommon that a scientist has been recognized after death (a well-known example is the geophysicist Alfred Wegener). The reasons for this are many, among which are the reluctance of the scientific community to accept new ideas and the impact of competition which undermines the recognition by close individuals—and death definitely removes closeness and often resolves competition. Quoting Max Planck, "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." A positive reading of this is that real contributions in science offer immortality; like physical sons and daughters, scientific publications continue life after one's death.

Such contributions are typically quantified by the evolving bibliometric indices but, as highlighted by the title of this article, inspired by traditional Scottish lyrics, recognition and reputation in science keep following some ways other than bibliometrics. Zbyszek knows this very well himself, from receiving the first ever Tison Award for young hydrologists to chairing the jury of this award over several years, or inviting key relevant and committed individuals onto the editorial board and to the pool of reviewers of HSJ.

During Zbyszek's term as HSJ Editor, the development of modern technological means has spectacularly accelerated

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Co-Editor, *Hydrological Sciences Journal*; <sup>b</sup>President, International Association of Hydrological Sciences; <sup>c</sup>Secretary General, International Association of Hydrological Sciences; <sup>d</sup>President Elect, International Association of Hydrological Sciences; <sup>e</sup>Past President, International Association of Hydrological Sciences; <sup>f</sup>"Panta Rhei" Coordinator [now retired] and President of the International Commission on Water Resources Systems, International Association of Hydrological Sciences; <sup>g</sup>Technical Editor, *Hydrological Sciences Journal*; <sup>h</sup>Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece; <sup>i</sup>Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK; <sup>j</sup>Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, Italy; <sup>k</sup>Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands; <sup>l</sup>Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, UMR 1069 SAS, Rennes, France; <sup>m</sup>Institute of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Austria; <sup>n</sup>Professor Emeritus, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; <sup>o</sup>IAHS, CEH Wallingford, UK</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

publication procedures and dissemination of articles. However, there may not have been substantial progress in the community ethics, except perhaps in the improvement in transparency and the reduction of plagiarism, again supported by modern technological means. Rather, there are symptoms of regression, or pathologies, which are discussed in Zbyszek's editorial, including those quoted above. What can the modern scientific community do to improve such a situation? Certainly we need to heal pathologies. We should urge scientists to write articles only when they have something new and important to say and make these articles appropriate for reading, or not produce them at all. Citations are always welcome, but it should be clear to the community that the purpose of writing articles is to communicate ideas and scientific results rather than to award authors by citations *per se*. In the long run, a poor article, even if it brings some citations in the beginning, will sink into oblivion.

An Editor's role is most crucial for the remedy of pathologies and the improvement of ethics—or the worsening thereof, in the case of failure. Zbyszek's career as *HSJ* Editor was a real success in all aspects, which makes him a role model for his successors and beyond. Indeed, he was very effective in pinpointing innovative—often controversial—papers, to which the peer review system can be hostile. By putting a lot of effort and time into reading the papers himself, Zbyszek was able to release and publish good controversial papers that were trapped in the review process (some interesting stories are contained in his article). He established a fair-play, transparent, objective, ethical and scientific style in the journal. For example, while, as a member of the inner circle of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he supported climate “orthodoxy”, he made the journal open to different ideas and debate between orthodox and sceptical or heretical views. In this way, *HSJ* has become the strongest and most respectful

vehicle of climate-hydrology dialogue, where both IPCC findings related to hydrology and critiques on them have been published.

Zbyszek has set a record of longevity as Editor of *HSJ*, which we believe will never be broken. He also supported *HSJ* as an author by publishing his high-quality papers in the Journal, thus achieving a record h-index for his *HSJ* publications alone (18 in the time of publication, which has grown to 20 by now). This is one of the many reflections of his loyalty to *HSJ* and IAHS. We, as *HSJ* Co-Editors, IAHS Officers and, above all, hydrologists, owe Zbyszek beyond measure. With his enormous dedication, hard work and integrity he has greatly served the world-wide community of hydrologists. Besides that, he has offered his best work to the Journal and, in doing so, set an example and stimulated others to use *HSJ* as the prime vehicle for their best work. In his article, he challenges us to try to beat his record *HSJ*-only h-index. It is not easy to take the challenge: We are sure that Zbyszek will continue to work for *HSJ* and support it and thus his personal record in *HSJ* publications will continue to grow. But we will try to follow him, for the benefit of the journal.

## ORCID

Demetris Koutsoyiannis http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-0241

## References

* Blöschl, G., Bardossy, A., Koutsoyiannis, D., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Littlewood, I. G., Montanari, A., and Savenije, H. H. G. (2014) Joint Editorial—On the future of journal publications in hydrology. *Hydrological Sciences Journal*, 59 (5), 955–958, doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.908041.

* Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2015) Farewell, *HSJ*!—address from the retiring editor. *Hydrological Sciences Journal*, 60 (9), 1463–1472, doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1058627.