# Physico-chemical characteristics and lipid oxidative stability of zebra (Equus Burchelli) droëwors made using different levels of sheep fat

Zikhona Mandela, Elodie Arnaud, Louwrens Christian Hoffman

► To cite this version:

Zikhona Mandela, Elodie Arnaud, Louwrens Christian Hoffman. Physico-chemical characteristics and lipid oxidative stability of zebra (Equus Burchelli) droëwors made using different levels of sheep fat. Foods, 2021, 10 (10), pp.2497. 10.3390/foods10102497. [https://hal.science/hal-05178982v1](https://hal.science/hal-05178982v1)

HAL Id: hal-05178982

https://hal.science/hal-05178982v1

Submitted on 23 Jul 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Lipid Oxidative Stability of Zebra (Equus Burchelli) Droëwors Made Using Different Levels of Sheep Fat

Zikhona Mandela¹, Elodie Arnaud²,³,⁴* and Louwrens C. Hoffman²,⁵

¹ Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X 1314, Alice 5700, South Africa; zmandela@ufh.ac.za

² Department of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1 Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa; louwrens.hoffman@uq.edu.au

³ CIRAD, UMR QualiSud, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa

⁴ Qualisud, Univ Montpellier, Avignon Université, CIRAD, Institut Agro, Université de La Réunion, F-34398 Montpellier, France

⁵ Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Digital Agricultural Building, 8115, Office 110, Gatton 4343, Australia

* Correspondence: elodie.arnaud@cirad.fr

**Citation:** Mandela, Z.; Arnaud, E.; Hoffman, L.C. Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Lipid Oxidative Stability of Zebra (Equus Burchelli) Droëwors Made Using Different Levels of Sheep Fat. *Foods* **2021**, *10*, 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102497

Academic Editors: Raffaella Branciari and David Ranucci

Received: 10 September 2021

Accepted: 2 October 2021

Published: 18 October 2021

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2021 by the authors. License MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

**Abstract:** The physico-chemical properties (proximate, salt content, water activity (a_w), pH) and lipid oxidation of droëwors (dried salted/spiced meat sausages) produced with zebra meat and different sheep fat levels (10, 15, and 20% by weight) measured at day 0 (before drying), day 2 (after drying at 30 °C and 40% relative humidity), and over a 90 day storage (day 17, 32, 47, 62, 77, and 92) under vacuum at 25 °C were investigated. The use of lower fat levels (10 and 15%) in the formulation resulted in higher weight loss during drying and droëwors with higher protein, ash, and salt content and lower a_w and pH compared to the droëwors made with 20% fat. The pH increased (*p* < 0.001) during storage for all the fat levels, while the moisture content and the a_w were stable as expected. TBARS values were the highest in droëwors made with 20% of fat after drying (day 2), but droëwors made with 10% of fat reached similar maximal values on day 17. Formulations containing 15% sheep fat displayed the lowest TBARS values after drying and along storage, and thus had the best characteristics in relation to oxidative stability.

**Keywords:** dry sausages; fat levels; nitrite free; game meat; wild meat; storage; proximate; water activity; TBARS

## 1. Introduction

Droëwors is a traditional South African shelf-stable salted and dried meat sausage produced from a combination of minced meat (beef, ostrich, or game species), fat, spices, and vinegar [1,2]. The mixture is stuffed into natural casings before being dried for a few days [3]. Drying is the oldest method of meat preservation, affecting the product characteristics by reducing the moisture content and its water activity so that microbial growth is limited [4]. Droëwors is a product produced predominantly for the domestic market, yet the quality of the product varies widely, and it is difficult to formulate quality standards due to the lack of published scientific literature.

Animal fat is added into meat products to improve texture, taste, and flavour [5,6], and allows the constant removal of water during drying [7]. Nonetheless, concerns raised by consumers about processed meat products with high levels of saturated fat [8] has led to wide investigations on fat reduction in these products. Consumers demand healthier and high-quality food products, which require lower fat levels whilst flavour and juici-
ness are maintained. Reduction of fat intake is recommended because of the adverse ef-
fects for human health through excessive consumption of fat, such as obesity and coronary
heart diseases [9,10].

The use of game meat, such as zebra, in the production of droëwors has not been
studied. Zebra meat is considered to be low in fat and cholesterol and rich in protein [11],
with a desirable fatty acids' (unsaturated) profile [12]. Utilising game meat holds a poten-
tial in contributing to food security and economic stability in South Africa [13,14] and the
rest of the world [15].

Beef fat (brisket) and sheep fat are commonly used in droëwors production; pork is hardly ever used due to increased rancidity, as showed by Mukumbo et al. [2]. Sheep fat, particularly that originating from fat-tailed indigenous breeds are saught after for the production of fresh “boerewors”, a South African fresh meat sausage. This is due to the enhanced flavour obtained from the fat of these sheep breeds. With the increase in game ranching, the meat from various wildlife species, including that from zebra meat, has become more readily available for consumption as fresh meat. These meats are also used in processed products [16–20]. Lipid oxidation is an important factor to consider in droëwors, as high fat products stored for long periods are more prone to lipid oxidation, especially in the case of meat products stored at ambient temperature such as droëwors. Lipid oxidation is affected by various factors during meat processing, such as grinding, salting, and seasoning [21]. The lipid prooxidant effect of salt might be amplified by the reduction in moisture and the resulting increase in salt concentration during the drying of droëwors. Moreover, nitrites which have an antioxidant effect, as they act as oxygen scavengers when oxidized to nitrates [22], are not added in droëwors unlike many dried pork products. Lipid oxidation can result in quality losses in meat and meat products by limiting the nutritional quality, affecting the flavour, colour, and odour, which can pose as a threat to human health [23,24]. However, there is no substantive data validating that zebra droëwors made with sheep fat is indeed a shelf-life stable product. The current study, therefore, aimed to examine the physico-chemical composition and lipid oxidative stability of South African droëwors made from different sheep fat levels and zebra meat during storage under vacuum.

**2. Materials and Methods**

2.1. *Droëwors Production and Storage*

Droëwors were made with zebra (Equus burchelli) meat and sheep fat at three dif-
ferent meat:fat ratios (90:10, 85:15, 80:20) at the meat processing facility of Stellenbosch
University. Zebra meat chunks (50 kg) were derived from 10 animals shot outside
Bredasdorp, Western Cape, South Africa, as part of a commercial culling operation. The
meat was cut into approximately 3 × 3 × 3 cm cubes after being trimmed of all external fat
and connective tissue, thoroughly mixed, and placed into a large container. No specific
carcass cuts/muscles were used. The same procedure was followed for the sheep back and
tail fat (22 kg in total) derived from 10 fat-tailed type sheep.

Out of the large container of zebra meat, a total of eight replicate batches per fat level
were produced separately. Each replicate batch was divided into three smaller batches of
2 kg, to which the three different levels of fat (treatment) were also randomly drawn for
inclusion into the droëwors, according to the specific replicate's recipe. Each batch of
zebra and fat chunks were mixed by hand with spices (Freddy Hirsch, Cape Town, South
Africa) before being ground through a 4.5 mm plate. Spices consisted of fine salt (1.5 g
salt/100 g meat/fat mixture), coarse coriander seed (20 g/100 g meat/fat mixture), coarse
black peppercorns (1 g/100 g meat/fat mixture), fine cloves (0.5 g/100 g meat/fat mixture),
fine nutmeg (0.5 g/100 g meat/fat mixture), and brown vinegar (5% (w/v) acidity) at 2 g/100
g meat/fat mixture. The ground mixture was stuffed into sheep casings (± 20–22 mm di-
ameter), left to rest overnight (~12 h) at ± 4 °C, and dried in a temperature and humidity-
controlled chamber at 30 °C and 40% relative humidity (RH) for 48 h ([2]). The weight of
each batch was recorded before and after drying to calculate the weight loss. The dried
sausages (droëwors) were packed under vacuum and stored in a chamber at 25 °C for 90
days, to determine lipid oxidation stability.

## 2.2. *Sampling and Preparation of Samples*

A 50 g sample was taken from each batch of droëwors at day 0 (raw batter before stuffing into casings) and after drying (day 2) for proximate, salt, water activity, pH, and lipid oxidation analysis. A representative 35 g sample was taken from each batch during storage on days 17, 32, 47, 62, 77, and 92 and analysed for moisture, water activity, pH, and lipid oxidation. All samples were homogenised individually in a blender (Ampa Cut-ter CT 35 N, Golasecca, Italy) for approximately 1 min. Each individual sample was roughly divided into two subsamples, one for lipid oxidation and one for other analyses, respectively stored at –80 °C and –20 °C until analysis.

## 2.3. *Chemical analysis*

For proximate analyses, the samples were analysed according to AOAC [25] for moisture (Method 934.01) and ash content (Method 942.05). Total fat content was determined using the chloroform/methanol (2:1) fat extraction method according to Lee et al. [26]. The defatted and dried (48 h, 60 °C) samples were analysed for nitrogen using a LECO Nitrogen/Protein analyser (FP-528, Leco Corporation, 3000 Lakeview Avenue, St Joseph, MI, USA) (AOAC [27] procedure 992.15). Protein was calculated by multiplying the percentage of nitrogen by 6.25.

For determination of salt content, a 0.3 g sample was weighed into a closed container and agitated under stirring for at least 2 h with 50 mL of 0.3 M nitric acid. The chloride concentration was determined using a 926 Chloride analyser (Sherwood Scientific, Cambridge, UK).

A calibrated pH meter was used with the aid of a penetration electrode and temperature probe to measure the pH of the samples. A total of 3 g of ground sample was added to 27 mL distilled water in duplicate, mixed using a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. Thereafter, pH was measured during continuous stirring using a Crison PH25 pH metre (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain), calibrated with pH 4 and pH 7 standard solutions at 25 ± 1 °C.

Water activity (a_w) was measured in duplicate using an Aqua Lab Dew Point Water Activity Meter 4TE (Decagon Devices, Inc., Washington, USA) at 25 °C.

Lipid oxidation was analysed by measuring the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) using a modified acid-precipitation technique, described by Mukumbo et al. [2]. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm in a Cecil CE2021 2000 Series spectrophotometer (Lasec SA (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria, South Africa). The TBARS values are expressed as mg malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalent (eq) per kg product.

All analyses were performed in duplicate.

## 2.4. *Statistical Analysis*

To test the effects of fat level and days on the various measurements, mixed model
repeated measures ANOVAs were used. For the mixed model, fat level and days were
treated as fixed effects, and the batches to which the treatments were applied as a random
effect. Fisher LSD post hoc test was used to further analyse significant differences when
the main effects/interaction effects were significant. Statistical analyses were conducted
using the VEPAC module of Statistica 13. A 5% significance level was used as a guideline
for determining significant differences.
# 3. Results and Discussion

## 3.1. Physico-Chemical Characteristics

The statistical significance (*p*-values) levels of the main effects and their interaction on the various physico-chemical parameters are indicated in Table 1. Interactions were noted for most of the measured attributes, excluding the fat and protein content. Day effect was significant on all the attributes (*p* ≤ 0.001). The fat level had an effect (*p* ≤ 0.001) on ash, *a*<sub>w</sub>, and (*p* ≤ 0.05) protein and salt content.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Level of statistical significance (*p*-values) for the main effects of sheep fat level, day, and their interactions on physico-chemical characteristics and TBARS of zebra droëwors.</caption><thead><tr><th>Attributes</th><th>Fat Level Effect</th><th>Day Effect</th><th>Fat Level × Day</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>moisture</td><td>0.694</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td></tr><tr><td>protein</td><td>0.030</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>0.48</td></tr><tr><td>fat</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>0.100</td></tr><tr><td>ash</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>0.030</td></tr><tr><td>salt</td><td>≤0.010</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td></tr><tr><td>water activity</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.010</td></tr><tr><td>pH</td><td>0.66</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td></tr><tr><td>TBARS</td><td>0.55</td><td>≤0.001</td><td>≤0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 2 shows the physico-chemical characteristics of zebra droëwors made at the different meat:fat ratios (90:10, 85:15, 80:20) before (raw batter) and after drying (day 2). The raw batter made with 20% fat showed a lower moisture and protein content, and a higher fat content compared to the 90:10 and 85:15 treatments. As expected, significant differences were found before and after drying for all the treatments for moisture, protein, fat, ash, salt, *a*<sub>w</sub>, as well as for pH because of the weight/moisture loss during drying. The weight loss during drying decreased when fat level increased. This might be due to both the lower moisture content in the raw batter and the higher fat content, as fat may limit moisture transfers during drying. Finally, the moisture content of the droëwors differs only in the 85:15 and the 80:20 treatments (27.91 and 30.45 g/100 g, respectively). Higher weight loss during drying when fat content is decreased in the raw batter at levels close to this study has also been reported for other types of rapidly dried sausages [18] and short ripened fermented sausages [28]. Proximate composition of the droëwors was in the range of values reported on commercial beef, game, and ostrich droëwors [2]. Mean values for fat content ranged between 19.71 and 24.54% after drying, and was higher for the meat fat ratio 80:20 because of the higher fat content in the raw batter and despite the lower weight loss during drying. Protein mean values across treatments were 40.03–46.22 g/100 g in droëwors after drying (57.56–64.96 g/100 g dry matter).

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Weight loss during drying and physico-chemical properties (mean and standard errors, *n* = 8) of raw batter and zebra droëwors made with different sheep fat levels.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Meat Fat Ratio</th><th colspan="3">Raw Batter (before Drying)</th><th colspan="3">Droëwors after Drying <sup>1</sup></th></tr><tr><th>90:10</th><th>85:15</th><th>80:20</th><th>90:10</th><th>85:15</th><th>80:20</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>weight loss</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>55.84 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.44</td><td>52.34 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.39</td><td>49.63 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.60</td></tr><tr><td>moisture</td><td>69.70 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.23</td><td>68.46 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.64</td><td>64.82 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.26</td><td>29.56 <sup>cd</sup> ± 0.88</td><td>27.91 <sup>d</sup> ± 0.71</td><td>30.45 <sup>c</sup> ± 1.11</td></tr><tr><td>protein</td><td>20.98 <sup>d</sup> ± 0.49</td><td>19.81 <sup>d</sup> ± 0.66</td><td>16.61 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.93</td><td>45.76 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.95</td><td>46.22 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.84</td><td>40.03 <sup>b</sup> ± 1.58</td></tr><tr><td>fat</td><td>6.97 <sup>e</sup> ± 0.70</td><td>9.30 <sup>d</sup> ± 0.73</td><td>13.67 <sup>c</sup> ± 1.17</td><td>19.71 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.61</td><td>19.99 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.81</td><td>24.54 <sup>a</sup> ± 1.13</td></tr><tr><td>ash</td><td>2.16 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.27</td><td>1.85 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.05</td><td>1.91 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.12</td><td>5.48 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.29</td><td>4.57 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.06</td><td>4.10 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.22</td></tr><tr><td>salt</td><td>0.94 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.03</td><td>0.93 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>0.94 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>2.02 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.07</td><td>1.91 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.04</td><td>1.69 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.04</td></tr><tr><td>water activity</td><td>0.986 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.985 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.987 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>0.878 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>0.881 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>0.907 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td></tr><tr><td>pH</td><td>5.95 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.09</td><td>5.86 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.00</td><td>5.85 <sup>a</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>5.46 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.01</td><td>5.44 <sup>b</sup> ± 0.02</td><td>5.30 <sup>c</sup> ± 0.01</td></tr></tbody></table>

Weight loss, moisture, protein, fat, ash, salt contents: g/100 g. <sup>a-e</sup> Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (*p* ≤ 0.05). <sup>1</sup> Drying conditions: 30 °C, 40% RH, 48 h.
Results for the effect of storage time (day 2–92) on moisture and $a_w$ for zebra droëwors with different fat levels are presented in Table S1 (supplementary material). The $a_w$ and moisture content are one of the determinants of prolonged shelf-life in meat products [29]. As expected, there was no evolution regarding moisture content (26.60–30.45 g/100 g) and $a_w$ (0.878–0.907) during storage, due to the vacuum packaging. Mukumbo et al. [2] reported a continuous decrease in moisture and $a_w$ during storage of droëwors in open packaging, i.e., paper bags at room temperature from 23.6 to 7.1% and 0.81 to 0.47, respectively.

There were no significant differences with increasing levels of fat amongst treatments for moisture during storage, while the $a_w$ increased ($p < 0.001$) with fat level (Figure 1), although all the values obtained are in accordance with the requirements of $a_w < 0.91$ for meat to be storable at ambient temperature. Leistner and Rodel [30] classified meat products based on their pH and $a_w$ values into “perishable” and “shelf-stable”. The “shelf-stable” meat products have an $a_w < 0.91$ or a pH < 5.2 and $a_w < 0.95$; no refrigeration is needed for these products, and their shelf-life stability is usually not restricted by bacterial growth but by physical or chemical spoilage, more specifically product discolouration and rancidity [31]. The $a_w$ for the higher fat treatment (20% fat: 0.885 in average for days 2–92) indicates a greater possibility for microbial growth in products with high levels of fat compared with low fat levels (in this case, 10% fat: 0.864 and 15% fat: 0.874). In fact, if most of the bacteria do not grow when $a_w$ is decreased to 0.91, Staphylococcus aureus can grow until $a_w$ is decreased at 0.85 and 0.6–0.70 for yeasts and mould [4,32].

The $a_w$ of droëwors is higher than values reported on commercial droëwors by Mukumbo et al. [2] (0.67–0.86), which is probably due to their lower salt content. The $a_w$ was rather similar to that of dry fermented sausages (0.85–0.91; [33]). However, in dry fermented sausages, pH is another hurdle to microbial contamination.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Water activity of zebra droëwors made with different sheep fat levels (means of day 2–day 92). <sup>ab</sup> Means with different superscripts differ ($p \le 0.001$).</figcaption></figure>

The pH showed significant values for storage days' effect and the interaction of fat level and storage days (Figure 2). The pH of droëwors after drying ranged from 5.30–5.46 (Table 2), and increased significantly during storage. Mukumbo et al. [2] reported values ranging between 4.9 to 5.7 on commercial products. Up to day 47 (45 days of storage), the pH was still in this range. We did not measure pH as low as 4.9, as was noted in the study of Mukumbo et al. [2], their lower readings might be due to the use of higher volumes of vinegar compared to our study (2% of vinegar 5% *w/v* acidity). In fact, the same formulation in biltong and droëwors is used by processors, as droëwors are currently processed
from off cuts of the meat used in the production of biltong. Up to 5% of vinegar (5% acidity) has been reported in the processing of biltong and its addition resulted in the pH decreasing to values lower than 5 [34].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** pH of zebra droëwors made with different sheep fat levels during storage. a–h Means with different superscripts differ (*p* ≤ 0.001).</figcaption></figure>

The increase in the pH of the droëwors during storage is in accordance with the findings of Mukumbo et al. [35]. These authors reported an increase from 5.3 to 6.0 within the first 10 days of storage of pork droëwors stored 2 months unpacked in ambient conditions. A smaller increase in pH (0.3 unit) is often noticed at the end of ripening of mould ripened fermented sausages, after its reduction to values close to 5.0 throughout the first days of fermentation. This is due to the utilisation of lactate and acetate and the production of ammonia from amino acid breakdown [36]. A pH higher than 6 was recorded in some dry fermented sausages, such as traditional pork sausages [37], dry fermented sausages made from deer [38], and some game meat, such as the meat from black wildebeest which is known to be easily stressed [39]. The pH of droëwors made with 20% fat, which was lower at the end of drying compared to the two other treatments, exhibited a higher increase in pH and showed higher values from day 47 until the end of storage. This might be related with its higher $a_w$, as microorganisms are involved in proteolytic phenomena, and its lower salt content as salt acts as an inhibitor of muscle proteolytic activity [7].

### 3.2. TBARS

The results of lipid oxidation for zebra droëwors (before, after drying, and during storage at 25 °C, under vacuum) are depicted in Figure 3. Differences (*p* < 0.001) are seen in the droëwors before and after drying, between treatments, and throughout storage. Before drying (day 0), TBARS were similar for all sheep fat levels. During drying and successive storage, TBARS increased then decreased, as shown in pork droëwors [2,35] and other dry meat products [40–42]. This phenomenon in measured TBARS is attributed to the fact that MDA is an intermediate product in lipid oxidation, and can react with proteins [43]. After drying (day 2), TBARS values were highest in droëwors made with 20% of fat and TBARS decreased with fat level, but droëwors made with 10% of fat reached similar maximum values on day 17. The maximum value measured for the 15% fat treatment (1.5 mg eq MDA/kg) was lowest than the maximum value measured for the two
other treatments. However, the maximal value might have been reached between the sam-
plings of day 2 and 17. The 80:20 and 90:10 had similar maximum TBARS values. Despite
its lower fat content, the 90:10 treatment had higher salt content and higher pH, and it has
been showed that lipid oxidation increased as the pH of meat decreased to from 7 to 5.9
[44].

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** TBARS of zebra droëwors made with different sheep fat levels before drying (day 0), after drying (day 2), and during storage at 25 °C, under vacuum (day 17–92). TBARS: MDA mg eq/kg (eq = equivalent).<sup>a,†</sup> Means with different superscripts differ (*p* ≤ 0.05).</figcaption></figure>

Different types of meat and fat have been studied in droëwors production and
TBARS values have been followed at different stages. Jones et al. [45] reported lower
TBARS (0.7–0.9 mg MDA eq/kg at the end of 2 days drying) in droëwors made from other
game species (blesbok, springbok, and fallow deer) and sheep fat (30%). Mukumbo et al.
[2] produced and stored droëwors from beef and pork, together with beef and pork fat
and reported higher TBARS values for pork droëwors after drying and during storage at
25 °C without packaging (1.8–3.8 mg MDA eq/kg dry matter), as compared with beef
droëwors (<1 mg MDA eq/kg dry matter). Differences in TBARS values were explained
by the saturated fat profile in beef fat compared to that from pork with the latter fat source
being more susceptible to rancidity. TBARS of pork fermented dry sausages reached
lower values (often less than 1, sometimes up to 2 mg MDA eq/kg [46]) as did sheep fer-
mented sausages [47,48], however it should be remembered that droëwors are processed
without nitrites/nitrates and at a higher temperature. The increase in TBARS with fat level
in fermented dry sausages have already been reported [46,49].

According to Campo et al. [50], rancidity is detectable when TBARS values are higher
than or equal to 2 mg MDA eq/kg of fresh meat, although Utrilla et al. [51] reported that
values up to 5 mg MDA eq/kg are acceptable whilst 10 mg MDA eq/kg is unacceptable.
This is in accordance with the study of Hoffman et al. [52], in which the TBARS of
droëwors over a drying period of 15 days produced with ostrich meat and 25% pork fat
reached 7–11 mg MDA eq/kg, while no rancidity was detected by the panel. In this regard,
droëwors for all treatment levels gave acceptable results in terms of lipid oxidation to-
wards the end of storage (day 32–92).
## 4. Conclusions

A higher weight loss was obtained for the 90:10 and 85:15 treatment compared to the 80:20 treatment, and their fat content were lower as a result of their lower fat content in the raw batter and despite the higher moisture loss during drying. pH ranged between 5.3–5.46 after drying, despite the addition of vinegar and a higher increase in pH during storage was measured for the droëwors made with 20% of fat as well as higher values from day 47 until the end of storage. This might be due to higher proteolytic activity related with its higher $a_w$ and lower salt content. These values were however still in the range for shelf-stable products (>0.91), but a recommendation could be to reduce $a_w$ by increasing salt content in the formulation at 2% and/or to add more vinegar, as additional salt might have health implications.

An interesting trend was observed for the lipid oxidation of droëwors across treatments. TBARS values increased significantly after drying or the early days of storage at 25 °C under vacuum (up to 3 mg MDA eq/kg), but decreased and remained at a minimum during storage whatever the fat level. Furthermore, the highest fat level (20%) led to a higher lipid oxidation after drying, but similar maximal values were reached later with the droëwors made with 10% of fat. This seems to be higher than TBARS values recorded in droëwors made with other meat/fat (except those made with pork meat and fat) or fermented sausages. However, the impact of such high values on the detection of rancidity by a sensory panel or consumers should be studied. With the growing recognition of quality and sensory properties of meat products, consumer and sensory evaluation of zebra droëwors made with different levels of sheep fat should be evaluated. Furthermore, future research could be conducted on the fatty acid profile of this product, as fat reduction or utilisation of a healthier fatty acid profile could be an advantage in the production of droëwors, making it a healthy ready-to-eat meat product and thus playing a role in the formulation and shelf-life stability of droëwors.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10102497/s1, Table S1. Moisture and water activity (mean and standard errors, *n*=8) of zebra droëwors made with different sheep fat levels after drying (day 2) and during storage (day 17-92).

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization and methodology, Z.M., E.A. and L.C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.M.; writing—review and editing, E.A and L.C.H.; supervision, E.A. and L.C.H.; funding acquisition, L.C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This work is based on research funded by a National Research Foundation (NRF) Scarce Skills (grant number: 108172) grant. This research was also supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARCHI) and partly funded by the South African Department of Science and Technology (UID number: 84633), as administered by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, and partly by the Department of Trade and Industry's THRIP program (THRIP/64/19/04/2017) with Wildlife Ranching South Africa as partner. Any opinion, finding, and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s) and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.

**Data Availability Statement:** Data from this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.

**Acknowledgments:** The contribution of Voster Muchenje from the University of Fort Hare during the initial phases of this investigation is appreciated.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
## References

1. Burnham: G.M.; Hanson, D.J.; Koshick, C.M.; Ingham, S.C. Death of *Salmonella serovars, Escherichia coli* O157: H7, *Staphylococcus aureus* and *Listeria monocytogenes* during the drying of meat: A case study using biltong and droewors. *J. Food Saf.* **2008**, *28*, 198–209, doi:10.1111/j.1745-4565.2008.00114.x.

2. Mukumbo, F.E.; Arnaud, E.; Collignan, A.; Hoffman, L.C.; Descalzo, A.M.; Muchenje, V. Physico-chemical composition and oxidative stability of South African beef, game, ostrich and pork droewors. *J. Food Sci. Technol.* **2018**, *55*, 4833–4840, doi:10.1007/s13197-018-3417-2.

3. Jones, M.; Arnaud, E.; Gouws, P.; Hoffman, L.C. Processing of South African biltong—A review. *South Afr. J. Anim. Sci.* **2017**, *47*, 743–757, doi:10.4314/sajas.v47i6.2.

4. Zukal, E.; Incze, K. Drying. In *Handbook of Meat Processing*; Toldra, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2015; pp. 219–229.

5. De Hoog, E.H.A.; Ruijschop, R.; Pyett, S.P.; De Kok, P.M.T. The functional attributes that fats bring to food. In *Reducing Saturated Fats in Foods*; Talbot, G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science Technology and Nutrition: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 29–46.

6. Teixeira, A.; Ferreira, I.; Pereira, E.; Vasconcelos, L.; Leite, A.; Rodrigues, S. Physicochemical composition and sensory quality of goat meat burgers. Effect of fat source. *Foods* **2021**, *10*, 1824, doi:10.3390/foods10081824.

7. Ruiz, J.; Perez-Palacios, T. Ingredients. In *Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry*, 2nd ed.; Toldra, F., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 55–67.

8. Grasso, S.; Brunton, N.P.; Lyng, J.G.; Lalor, F.; Monahan, F.J. Healthy processed meat products—Regulatory, reformulation and consumer challenges. *Trends Food Sci. Technol.* **2014**, *39*, 4–17, doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.06.006.

9. Geiker, N.R.W.; Bertram, H.C.; Mejborn, H.; Dragsted, L.O.; Kristensen, L.; Carrascal, J.R.; Bügel, S.; Astrup, A. Meat and human health—Current knowledge and research gaps. *Foods* **2021**, *10*, 1556.

10. Webb, E.C.; O'Neill, H.A. The animal fat paradox and meat quality. *Meat Sci.* **2008**, *80*, 28–36, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.029.

11. Hoffman, L.C.; Wiklund, E. Game and venison–meat for the modern consumer. *Meat Sci.* **2006**, *74*, 197–208, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.005.

12. Hoffman, L.C.; Geldenhuys, G.; Cawthorn, D.M. Proximate and fatty acid composition of zebra (*Equus quagga burchellii*) muscle and subcutaneous fat. *J. Sci. Food Agric.* **2016**, *96*, 3922–3927, doi:10.1002/jsfa.7623.

13. WorldBank. Agriculture and Rural Development. *Agriculture Investment Sourcebook*; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

14. Cooper, S.; Van der Merwe, M. Game ranching for meat production in marginal African agricultural lands. *J. Arid. Land Stud.* **2004**, *24*, 249–252.

15. Booth, H.; Clark, M.; Milner-Gulland, E.J.; Amponsah-Mensah, K.; Antunes, A.P.; Brittain, S.; Castilho, L.C.; Campos-Silva, J.V.; Constantino, P.D.L.; Li, Y.H.; et al. Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems. *Curr. Biol.* **2021**, *31*, 1788, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.079.

16. Chakanya, C.; Arnaud, E.; Muchenje, V.; Hoffman, L.C. Fermented meat sausages from game and venison: What are the opportunities and limitations? *J. Sci. Food Agric.* **2020**, *100*, 5023–5031, doi:10.1002/jsfa.9053.

17. Hoffman, L.C.; Schoon, K.; Rudman, M.; Brand, T.S.; Dalle Zotte, A.; Cullere, M. Profile of cabanossi made with exotic meats and olive oil. *Meat Sci.* **2019**, *147*, 20–27, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.08.012.

18. Mahachi, L.N.; Rudman, M.; Arnaud, E.; Muchenje, V.; Hoffman, L.C. Development of semi dry sausages (cabanossi) with warthog (*Phacocoerus africanus*) meat: Physicochemical and sensory attributes. *LWT Food Sci. Technol.* **2019**, *115*, 318–327, doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108454.

19. Mahachi, L.N.; Rudman, M.; Arnaud, E.; Muchenje, V.; Hoffman, L.C. Application of fat-tailed sheep tail and backfat to develop novel warthog cabanossi with distinct sensory attributes. *Foods* **2020**, *9*, 1822, doi:10.3390/foods9121822.

20. Van Schalkwyk, D.; McMillin, K.; Witthuhn, R.; Hoffman, L. The contribution of wildlife to sustainable natural resource utilization in Namibia: A review. *Sustainability* **2010**, *2*, 3479–3499.

21. Mariutti, L.R.B.; Bragagnolo, N. Influence of salt on lipid oxidation in meat and seafood products: A review. *Food Res. Int.* **2017**, *94*, 90–100, doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.02.003.

22. Pegg, R.B.; Honikel, K.O. Principles of curing. In *Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry*, 2nd ed.; Toldra, F., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 19–30.

23. Falowo, A.B.; Fayemi, P.O.; Muchenje, V. Natural antioxidants against lipid-protein oxidative deterioration in meat and meat products: A review. *Food Res. Int.* **2014**, *64*, 171–181, doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.022.

24. Gomez, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Effect of packaging conditions on shelf-life of fresh foal meat. *Meat Sci.* **2012**, *91*, 513–520, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.03.007.

25. AOAC. *Official Methods of Analysis*, 17th ed.; Association of official Analytical Chemists: Washington, USA, 2002.

26. Lee, C.M.; Trevino, B.; Chaiyawat, M. A simple and rapid solvent extraction method for determining total lipids in fish tissue. *J. AOAC Int.* **1996**, *79*, 487–492.

27. AOAC. *Official Methods of Analysis*, 14th ed.; Association of official Analytical Chemists: Washington, USA, 1994.

28. Safa, H.; Gatellier, P.; Lebert, A.; Picgirard, L.; Mirade, P.S. Effect of combined salt and animal fat reductions on physicochemical and biochemical changes during the manufacture of dry-fermented sausages. *Food Bioprocess Technol.* **2015**, *8*, 2109–2122, doi:10.1007/s11947-015-1563-3.
29. Earle, R.; Earle, M. *Fundamentals of Food Reaction Technology*; The New Zealand Institute of Food Science & Technology., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2008.

30. Leistner, L.; Rodel, W. The significance of water activity for microorganisms in meats. In *Water Relations of Food*; Duckworth, R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1975; pp. 309–323.

31. Ambrosiadis, J.; Soultos, N.; Abraham, A.; Bloukas, J.G. Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory attributes for the characterization of Greek traditional sausages. *Meat Sci.* **2004**, *66*, 279–287, doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(03)00100-1.

32. Mujumdar, A.; Devahastin, S. Fundamental principles of drying. In *Mujumdar's Pratical Guide to Industrial Drying*, Mujumdar, A., Ed.; Colour Publications Pvt. Ltd.: Mumbai, India, 2004; pp. 1–20.

33. Vignolo, G.; Fontana, C.; Fadda, S. Semidry and dry fermented sausages. In *Handbook of Meat Processing*, Toldra, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 379–398.

34. Jones, M.; Arnaud, E.; Gouws, P.; Hoffman, L.C. Effects of the addition of vinegar, weight loss and packaging method on the physicochemical properties and microbiological profile of biltong. *Meat Sci.* **2019**, *156*, 214–221, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.003.

35. Mukumbo, F.E.; Descalzo, A.M.; Collignan, A.; Hoffman, L.C.; Servent, A.; Muchenje, V.; Arnaud, E. Effect of *Moringa oleifera* leaf powder on drying kinetics, physico-chemical properties, ferric reducing antioxidant power, alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, and lipid oxidation of dry pork sausages during processing and storage. *J. Food Process. Preserv.* **2020**, *44*, doi:10.1111/jfpp.14300.

36. Bruna, J.M.; Ordonez, J.A.; Fernandez, M.; Herranz, B.; De la Hoz, L. Microbial and physico-chemical changes during the ripening of dry fermented sausages superficially inoculated with or having added an intracellular cell-free extract of *Penicillium aurantiogriseum*. *Meat Sci.* **2001**, *59*, 87–96, doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00057-2.

37. Leroy, S.; Lebert, I.; Talon, R. *Microorganisms in Traditional Fermented Meats*; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 99–105.

38. Soriano, A.; Cruz, B.; Gomez, L.; Mariscal, C.; Ruiz, A.G. Proteolysis, physicochemical acid composition of dry sausages characteristics and free fatty made with deer (*Cervus elaphus*) or wild boar (*Sus scrofa*) meat: A preliminary study. *Food Chem.* **2006**, *96*, 173–184, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.019.

39. Chakanya, C.; Arnaud, E.; Muchenje, V.; Hoffman, L.C. Changes in the physico-chemical attributes through processing of salami made from blesbok (*Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi*), eland (*Taurotragus oryx*), fallow deer (*Dama dama*), springbok (*Antidorcas marsupialis*) and black wildebeest (*Connochaetes gnou*) in comparison to pork. *Meat Sci.* **2018**, *146*, 87–92, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.07.034.

40. Ghiretti, G.P.; Zanardi, E.; Novelli, E.; Campanini, G.; Dazzi, G.; Madarena, G.; Chizzolini, R. Comparative evaluation of some antioxidants in salame Milano and mortadella production. *Meat Sci.* **1997**, *47*, 167–176, doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(97)00059-4.

41. Nassu, R.T.; Goncalves, L.A.G.; da Silva, M.; Beserra, F.J. Oxidative stability of fermented goat meat sausage with different levels of natural antioxidant. *Meat Sci.* **2003**, *63*, 43–49, doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00051-7.

42. Zapata, J.F.F.; Ledward, D.A.; Lawrie, R.A. Preparation and storage stability of dried salted mutton. *Meat Sci.* **1990**, *27*, 109–118, doi:10.1016/0309-1740(90)90059-f.

43. Viljanen, K.; Kivikari, R.; Heinonen, M. Protein-lipid interactions during liposome oxidation with added anthocyanin and other phenolic compounds. *J. Agric. Food Chem.* **2004**, *52*, 1104–1111, doi:10.1021/jf034785e.

44. Yasosky, J.J.; Aberle, E.D.; Peng, I.C.; Mills, E.W.; Judge, M.D. Effects of pH and time of grinding on lipid oxidation of fresh ground pork. *J. Food Sci.* **1984**, *49*, 1510–1512, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb12832.x.

45. Jones, M.; Hoffman, L.C.; Muller, M. Effect of rooibos extract (*Aspalathus linearis*) on lipid oxidation over time and the sensory analysis of blesbok (*Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi*) and springbok (*Antidorcas marsupialis*) droewors. *Meat Sci.* **2015**, *103*, 54–60, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.12.012.

46. Liaros, N.G.; Katsanidis, E.; Bloukas, J.G. Effect of the ripening time under vacuum and packaging film permeability on processing and quality characteristics of low-fat fermented sausages. *Meat Sci.* **2009**, *83*, 589–598, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.07.006.

47. Bozkurt, H.; Erkmen, O. Effects of some commercial additives on the quality of sucuk (Turkish dry-fermented sausage). *Food Chem.* **2007**, *101*, 1465–1473, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.002.

48. Fernandes, R.P.P.; Trindade, M.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; De Melo, M.P. Assessment of the stability of sheep sausages with the addition of different concentrations of *Origanum vulgare* extract during storage. *Meat Sci.* **2018**, *137*, 244–257, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.018.

49. Olivares, A.; Navarro, J.L.; Flores, M. Effect of fat content on aroma generation during processing of dry fermented sausages. *Meat Sci.* **2011**, *87*, 264–273, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.10.021.

50. Campo, M.M.; Nute, G.R.; Hughes, S.I.; Enser, M.; Wood, J.D.; Richardson, R.I. Flavour perception of oxidation in beef. *Meat Sci.* **2006**, *72*, 303–311, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.07.015.

51. Utrilla, M.C.; Ruiz, A.G.; Soriano, A. Effect of partial reduction of pork meat on the physicochemical and sensory quality of dry ripened sausages: Development of a healthy venison salchichon. *Meat Sci.* **2014**, *98*, 785–791, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.027.

52. Hoffman, L.C.; Jones, M.; Muller, N.; Joubert, E.; Sadie, A. Lipid and protein stability and sensory evaluation of ostrich (*Struthio camelus*) droewors with the addition of rooibos tea extract (*Aspalathus linearis*) as a natural antioxidant. *Meat Sci.* **2014**, *96*, 1289–1296, doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.036.