284. S. Simonucci, S. Taioli, S. Palmerini, M. Busso, Theoretical estimates of stellar e⁻ captures. I. The half-life of <sup>7</sup>Be in evolved stars. Astrophys. J. **764**(2), 118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/118

285. T. Morresi, S. Taioli, S. Simonucci, Nuclear beta decay: relativistic theory and ab initio simulations of electroweak decay spectra in medium-heavy nuclei and of atomic and molecular electronic structure (adv. theory simul. 11/2018). Adv. Theory Simul. **1**(11), 1870030 (2018)

286. D. Mascali, A. Musumarra, F. Leone, F.P. Romano et al., PANDORA, a new facility for interdisciplinary in-plasma physics. Eur. Phys. J. A **53**(7), 145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12335-1. arXiv:1703.00479 [physics.ins-det]

287. A. Chieffi, L. Roberti et al., Impact of the new measurement of the <sup>12</sup>C + <sup>12</sup>C fusion cross section on the final compactness of massive stars. Astrophys. J. **916**(2), 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac06ca. arXiv:2106.00013 [astro-ph.SR]

288. R.G. Pizzone et al., Clusters and their fundamental role for Trojan Horse Method. Eur. Phys. J. A **56**(11), 283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00285-8

289. D. Dell'Aquila, I. Lombardo, G. Verde, M. Vigilante et al., High-precision probe of the fully sequential decay width of the Hoyle State in <sup>12</sup>C. Phys. Rev. Lett. **119**(13), 132501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.132501. arXiv:1705.09196 [nucl-ex]

290. H. Zheng, A. Bonasera, The Thomas theorem and the EFIMOV states within a generalized Bohr model. J. Phys. Commun. **4**(8), 085011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/abaca4

291. S.E. Hale, A.E. Champagne, C. Iliadis, V.Y. Hansper, D.C. Powell, J.C. Blackmon, Investigation of the <sup>23</sup>Na (p,γ) <sup>24</sup>Mg and <sup>23</sup>Na (p,α) <sup>20</sup>Ne reactions via (³He, d) spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. C **70**(4), 045802 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.045802

292. G. Christian, D. Hutcheon et al., Strength of the E<sub>c.m.</sub>=1113 keV resonance in <sup>20</sup>Ne(p,γ) <sup>21</sup>Na. Phys. Rev. C **88**(3), 038801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.038801. arXiv:1309.1503 [nucl-ex]

293. C.A. Bertulani, T. Kajino, Frontiers in nuclear astrophysics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. **89**, 56–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.04.001. arXiv:1604.03197 [nucl-th]

294. C. Pitrou et al., Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rep. **754**, 1–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005. arXiv:1801.08023 [astro-ph.CO]

295. R.J. Cooke, Big bang nucleosynthesis and the helium isotope ratio. Astrophys. J. Lett. **812**(1), 12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/L12. arXiv:1510.02801 [astro-ph.CO]

296. L. Sbordone et al., The metal-poor end of the Spite plateau. I. Stellar parameters, metallicities, and lithium abundances. Astron. Astrophys. **522**, 26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913282. arXiv:1003.4510 [astro-ph.GA]

297. A. Tumino, R. Sparta, C. Spitaleri, A.M. Mukhamedzhanov, S. Typel, R.G. Pizzone, E. Tognelli, S. Degl'Innocenti et al., New determination of the <sup>2</sup>H(d, p)<sup>3</sup>H and <sup>2</sup>H(d, n)<sup>3</sup>He reaction rates at astrophysical energies. Astrophys. J. **785**(2), 96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/96

298. S.Q. Hou, T. Kajino, T.C.L. Trueman, M. Pignatari, Y.D. Luo, C.A. Bertulani, New thermonuclear rate of <sup>7</sup>Li(d, n)<sup>2</sup>He relevant to the cosmological lithium problem. Astrophys. J. **920**(2), 145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1a11. arXiv:2105.05470 [astro-ph.CO]

299. R.H. Cyburt et al., Big bang nucleosynthesis: present status. Rev. Mod. Phys. **88**(1), 015004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004. arXiv:1505.01076 [astro-ph.CO]

300. R. Diehl et al., Radioactive <sup>26</sup>Al from massive stars in the Galaxy. Nature **439**(7072), 45–47 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04364. arXiv:astro-ph/0601015 [astro-ph]

301. E.F. Keane, M. Kramer, On the birthrates of Galactic neutron stars. Mon. Not. RAS **391**(4), 2009–2016 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14045.x. arXiv:0810.1512 [astro-ph]

302. J. Baker, M. Bizzarro, N. Wittig, J. Connelly, H. Haack, Early planetesimal melting from an age of 4.5662Gyr for differentiated meteorites. Nature **436**(7054), 1127–1131 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03882

303. P. Banerjee et al., Evidence from stable isotopes and <sup>10</sup>Be for solar system formation triggered by a low-mass supernova. Nat. Commun. **7**, 13639 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13639. arXiv:1611.07162 [astro-ph.SR]

304. C. Iliadis et al., The Effects of Thermonuclear Reaction Rate Variations on <sup>26</sup>Al Production in Massive Stars: A Sensitivity Study. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **193**(1), 16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/16. arXiv:1101.5553 [astro-ph.SR]

305. C. Lederer-Woods, P.J. Woods, T. Davinson, D. Kahl, S.J. Lonsdale et al., Destruction of the cosmic gamma-ray emitter <sup>26</sup>Al in massive stars: Study of the key <sup>26</sup>Al(n, p) reaction. Phys. Rev. C **104**(2), 022803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L022803

306. C. Lederer-Woods, P.J. Woods, T. Davinson, A. Estrade, J. Heyse, D. Kahl, S.J. Lonsdale, C. Paradela, P. Schillebeeckx et al., Destruction of the cosmic γ -ray emitter <sup>26</sup>Al in massive stars: study of the key <sup>26</sup>Al(n, α) reaction. Phys. Rev. C **104**(3), 032803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L032803

307. G.L. Guardo, C. Spitaleri, L. Lamia et al., Assessing the near threshold cross section of the <sup>17</sup>O(n, α) <sup>14</sup>C reaction by means of the Trojan horse method. Phys. Rev. C **95**(2), 025807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025807

308. S. Cherubini, M. Gulino, C. Spitaleri, G.G. Rapisarda et al., First application of the Trojan horse method with a radioactive ion beam: study of the <sup>18</sup>F(p, α) <sup>15</sup>O reaction at astrophysical energies. Phys. Rev. C **92**(1), 015805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015805. arXiv:1505.00593 [nucl-ex]

309. R.G. Pizzone, B.T. Roeder, M. McCleskey, L. Trache, R.E. Tribble, C. Spitaleri et al., Trojan Horse measurement of the <sup>18</sup>F(p, α) <sup>15</sup>O astrophysical S(E)-factor. Eur. Phys. J. A **52**, 24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16024-3

310. M. La Cognata, R.G. Pizzone, J. José, M. Hernanz et al., A Trojan Horse approach to the production of <sup>18</sup>F in Novae. Astrophys. J. **846**(1), 65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa845f

311. L. Lamia, M. Mazzocco, R.G. Pizzone, S. Hayakawa, M. La Cognata, C. Spitaleri et al., Cross-section measurement of the cosmologically relevant <sup>7</sup>Be(n, α)<sup>4</sup>He reaction over a broad energy range in a single experiment. Astrophys. J. **879**(1), 23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2234

312. C. Iliadis et al., The effects of thermonuclear reaction-rate variations on nova nucleosynthesis: a sensitivity study. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **142**(1), 105–137 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1086/341400. arXiv:astro-ph/0206020 [astro-ph]

313. G. D'Agata, A.I. Kilic, V. Burjan, J. Mrazek et al., <sup>26</sup>Si(p,γ)<sup>27</sup>P direct proton capture by means of the asymptotic normalization coefficients method for mirror nuclei. Phys. Rev. C **103**(1), 015806 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.015806

314. R. Sawada, K. Maeda, Nucleosynthesis constraints on the energy growth timescale of a core-collapse supernova explosion. Astrophys. J. **886**(1), 47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4da3. arXiv:1910.06972 [astro-ph.HE]

315. V. Margerin, A.S.J. Murphy et al., Study of the <sup>44</sup>Ti(α, p)<sup>47</sup>V reaction and implications for core collapse supernovae. Phys. Lett. B **731**, 358–361 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.03.003

316. B.H. Moazen, C. Matei et al., Direct studies of low-energy resonances in <sup>31</sup>P(p, α)<sup>28</sup>Si and <sup>35</sup>Cl(p, α)<sup>32</sup>S. Eur. Phys. J. A **47**, 66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11066-7

317. M. Pignatari, R. Gallino, M. Heil, M. Wiescher et al., The weak s-process in massive stars and its dependence on the neutron capture cross sections. Astrophys. J. **710**(2), 1557–1577 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/1557
284. S. Simonucci, S. Taioli, S. Palmerini, M. Busso, Theoretical estimates of stellar e⁻ captures. I. The half-life of <sup>7</sup>Be in evolved stars. Astrophys. J. **764**(2), 118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/118

285. T. Morresi, S. Taioli, S. Simonucci, Nuclear beta decay: relativistic theory and ab initio simulations of electroweak decay spectra in medium-heavy nuclei and of atomic and molecular electronic structure (adv. theory simul. 11/2018). Adv. Theory Simul. **1**(11), 1870030 (2018)

286. D. Mascali, A. Musumarra, F. Leone, F.P. Romano et al., PANDORA, a new facility for interdisciplinary in-plasma physics. Eur. Phys. J. A **53**(7), 145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12335-1. arXiv:1703.00479 [physics.ins-det]

287. A. Chieffi, L. Roberti et al., Impact of the new measurement of the <sup>12</sup>C + <sup>12</sup>C fusion cross section on the final compactness of massive stars. Astrophys. J. **916**(2), 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac06ca. arXiv:2106.00013 [astro-ph.SR]

288. R.G. Pizzone et al., Clusters and their fundamental role for Trojan Horse Method. Eur. Phys. J. A **56**(11), 283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00285-8

289. D. Dell'Aquila, I. Lombardo, G. Verde, M. Vigilante et al., High-precision probe of the fully sequential decay width of the Hoyle State in <sup>12</sup>C. Phys. Rev. Lett. **119**(13), 132501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.132501. arXiv:1705.09196 [nucl-ex]

290. H. Zheng, A. Bonasera, The Thomas theorem and the EFIMOV states within a generalized Bohr model. J. Phys. Commun. **4**(8), 085011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/abaca4

291. S.E. Hale, A.E. Champagne, C. Iliadis, V.Y. Hansper, D.C. Powell, J.C. Blackmon, Investigation of the <sup>23</sup>Na (p,γ) <sup>24</sup>Mg and <sup>23</sup>Na (p,α) <sup>20</sup>Ne reactions via (³He, d) spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. C **70**(4), 045802 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.045802

292. G. Christian, D. Hutcheon et al., Strength of the E<sub>c.m.</sub>=1113 keV resonance in <sup>20</sup>Ne(p,γ) <sup>21</sup>Na. Phys. Rev. C **88**(3), 038801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.038801. arXiv:1309.1503 [nucl-ex]

293. C.A. Bertulani, T. Kajino, Frontiers in nuclear astrophysics. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. **89**, 56–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnpn.2016.04.001. arXiv:1604.03197 [nucl-th]

294. C. Pitrou et al., Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rep. **754**, 1–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005. arXiv:1801.08023 [astro-ph.CO]

295. R.J. Cooke, Big bang nucleosynthesis and the helium isotope ratio. Astrophys. J. Lett. **812**(1), 12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/812/1/L12. arXiv:1510.02801 [astro-ph.CO]

296. L. Sbordone et al., The metal-poor end of the Spite plateau. I. Stellar parameters, metallicities, and lithium abundances. Astron. Astrophys. **522**, 26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913282. arXiv:1003.4510 [astro-ph.GA]

297. A. Tumino, R. Sparta, C. Spitaleri, A.M. Mukhamedzhanov, S. Typel, R.G. Pizzone, E. Tognelli, S. Degl'Innocenti et al., New determination of the <sup>2</sup>H(d, p)<sup>3</sup>H and <sup>2</sup>H(d, n)<sup>3</sup>He reaction rates at astrophysical energies. Astrophys. J. **785**(2), 96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/96

298. S.Q. Hou, T. Kajino, T.C.L. Trueman, M. Pignatari, Y.D. Luo, C.A. Bertulani, New thermonuclear rate of <sup>7</sup>Li(d, n)<sup>2</sup>He relevant to the cosmological lithium problem. Astrophys. J. **920**(2), 145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1a11. arXiv:2105.05470 [astro-ph.CO]

299. R.H. Cyburt et al., Big bang nucleosynthesis: present status. Rev. Mod. Phys. **88**(1), 015004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015004. arXiv:1505.01076 [astro-ph.CO]

300. R. Diehl et al., Radioactive <sup>26</sup>Al from massive stars in the Galaxy. Nature **439**(7072), 45–47 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04364. arXiv:astro-ph/0601015 [astro-ph]

301. E.F. Keane, M. Kramer, On the birthrates of Galactic neutron stars. Mon. Not. RAS **391**(4), 2009–2016 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14045.x. arXiv:0810.1512 [astro-ph]

302. J. Baker, M. Bizzarro, N. Wittig, J. Connelly, H. Haack, Early planetesimal melting from an age of 4.5662Gyr for differentiated meteorites. Nature **436**(7054), 1127–1131 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03882

303. P. Banerjee et al., Evidence from stable isotopes and <sup>10</sup>Be for solar system formation triggered by a low-mass supernova. Nat. Commun. **7**, 13639 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13639. arXiv:1611.07162 [astro-ph.SR]

304. C. Iliadis et al., The Effects of Thermonuclear Reaction Rate Variations on <sup>26</sup>Al Production in Massive Stars: A Sensitivity Study. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **193**(1), 16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/16. arXiv:1101.5553 [astro-ph.SR]

305. C. Lederer-Woods, P.J. Woods, T. Davinson, D. Kahl, S.J. Lonsdale et al., Destruction of the cosmic gamma-ray emitter <sup>26</sup>Al in massive stars: Study of the key <sup>26</sup>Al(n, p) reaction. Phys. Rev. C **104**(2), 022803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L022803

306. C. Lederer-Woods, P.J. Woods, T. Davinson, A. Estrade, J. Heyse, D. Kahl, S.J. Lonsdale, C. Paradela, P. Schillebeeckx et al., Destruction of the cosmic γ -ray emitter <sup>26</sup>Al in massive stars: study of the key <sup>26</sup>Al(n, α) reaction. Phys. Rev. C **104**(3), 032803 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L032803

307. G.L. Guardo, C. Spitaleri, L. Lamia et al., Assessing the near threshold cross section of the <sup>17</sup>O(n,α) <sup>14</sup>C reaction by means of the Trojan horse method. Phys. Rev. C **95**(2), 025807 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025807

308. S. Cherubini, M. Gulino, C. Spitaleri, G.G. Rapisarda et al., First application of the Trojan horse method with a radioactive ion beam: study of the <sup>18</sup>F(p, α) <sup>15</sup>O reaction at astrophysical energies. Phys. Rev. C **92**(1), 015805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015805. arXiv:1505.00593 [nucl-ex]

309. R.G. Pizzone, B.T. Roeder, M. McCleskey, L. Trache, R.E. Tribble, C. Spitaleri et al., Trojan Horse measurement of the <sup>18</sup>F(p, α) <sup>15</sup>O astrophysical S(E)-factor. Eur. Phys. J. A **52**, 24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16024-3

310. M. La Cognata, R.G. Pizzone, J. José, M. Hernanz et al., A Trojan Horse approach to the production of <sup>18</sup>F in Novae. Astrophys. J. **846**(1), 65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa845f

311. L. Lamia, M. Mazzocco, R.G. Pizzone, S. Hayakawa, M. La Cognata, C. Spitaleri et al., Cross-section measurement of the cosmologically relevant <sup>7</sup>Be(n, α)<sup>4</sup>He reaction over a broad energy range in a single experiment. Astrophys. J. **879**(1), 23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2234

312. C. Iliadis et al., The effects of thermonuclear reaction-rate variations on nova nucleosynthesis: a sensitivity study. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **142**(1), 105–137 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1086/341400. arXiv:astro-ph/0206020 [astro-ph]

313. G. D'Agata, A.I. Kilic, V. Burjan, J. Mrazek et al., <sup>26</sup>Si(p,γ)<sup>27</sup>P direct proton capture by means of the asymptotic normalization coefficients method for mirror nuclei. Phys. Rev. C **103**(1), 015806 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.015806

314. R. Sawada, K. Maeda, Nucleosynthesis constraints on the energy growth timescale of a core-collapse supernova explosion. Astrophys. J. **886**(1), 47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4da3. arXiv:1910.06972 [astro-ph.HE]

315. V. Margerin, A.S.J. Murphy et al., Study of the <sup>44</sup>Ti(α, p)<sup>47</sup>V reaction and implications for core collapse supernovae. Phys. Lett. B **731**, 358–361 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.03.003

316. B.H. Moazen, C. Matei et al., Direct studies of low-energy resonances in <sup>31</sup>P(p, α)<sup>28</sup>Si and <sup>35</sup>Cl(p, α)<sup>32</sup>S. Eur. Phys. J. A **47**, 66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11066-7

317. M. Pignatari, R. Gallino, M. Heil, M. Wiescher et al., The weak s-process in massive stars and its dependence on the neutron capture cross sections. Astrophys. J. **710**(2), 1557–1577 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/1557
318. N. Nishimura et al., Uncertainties in s-process nucleosynthesis in massive stars determined by Monte Carlo variations. Mon. Not. RAS **469**(2), 1752-1767 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx696. arXiv:1701.00489 [astro-ph.SR]

319. F. Käppeler, R. Gallino, S. Bisterzo et al., The s process: nuclear physics, stellar models, and observations. Rev. Mod. Phys. **83**(1), 157-194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.157. arXiv:1012.5218 [astro-ph.SR]

320. S. Palmerini, M. Busso, D. Vescovi, E. Naselli, A. Pidatella, R. Mucciola et al., Presolar grain isotopic ratios as constraints to nuclear and stellar parameters of asymptotic giant branch star nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. **921**(1), 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1786. arXiv:2107.12037 [astro-ph.SR]

321. M. La Cognata, C. Spitaleri, O. Trippella, G.G. Kiss, G.V. Rogachev, A.M. Mukhamedzhanov et al., On the measurement of the $^{13}$C($\alpha$, n)$^{16}$O S-factor at negative energies and its influence on the s-process. Astrophys. J. **777**(2), 143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/143

322. P. Adsley et al., Reevaluation of the $^{22}$Ne($\alpha$, γ)$^{26}$Mg and $^{22}$Ne($\alpha$, n)$^{25}$Mg reaction rates. Phys. Rev. C **103**(1), 015805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.015805. arXiv:2005.14482 [nucl-ex]

323. A. Best, M. Beard, J. Görres et al., Measurement of the reaction $^{17}$O($\alpha$, n)$^{20}$Ne and its impact on the s process in massive stars. Phys. Rev. C **87**(4), 045805 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.045805. arXiv:1304.6443 [nucl-ex]

324. M.L. Sergi, G. D'Agata, G.L. Guardo, G.G. Rapisarda et al., Trojan Horse investigation for AGB stellar nucleosynthesis. Universe **8**(2), 128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8020128

325. A. Tumino et al., The Trojan Horse method: a nuclear physics tool for astrophysics. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. **71**(1), 345-376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-033642

326. P. Adsley et al., High-resolution study of levels in the astrophysically important nucleus $^{26}$Mg and resulting updated level assignments. Phys. Rev. C **97**, 045807 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.045807

327. I. Dillmann, T. Szücs, R. Plag et al., The Karlsruhe astrophysical database of nucleosynthesis in stars project—status and prospects. Nucl. Data Sheets **120**, 171-174 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.038

328. I.S. Anderson et al., Research opportunities with compact accelerator-driven neutron sources. Phys. Rep. **654**, 1-58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.007. Research opportunities with compact accelerator-driven neutron sources

329. J. Praena, P.F. Mastinu, G.M. Hernández, A method to obtain a Maxwell-Boltzmann neutron spectrum at $kT = 30$ keV for nuclear astrophysics studies. Public. Astron. Soc. Aust. **26**(3), 225-231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1071/AS08043

330. G. Gyürky et al., The activation method for cross section measurements in nuclear astrophysics. Eur. Phys. J. A **55**(3), 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12708-4. arXiv:1903.03339 [nucl-ex]

331. A. Alejo, H. Ahmed, A. Green, S.R. Mirfayzi et al., Recent advances in laser-driven neutron sources. Nuovo Cim. C Geophys. Sp. Phys. C **38**, 188 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2015-15188-8

332. T.J. Renk, P.F. Ottinger, R.E. Durrer, Production of pulsed high-energy neutron bursts from beam-target interaction using a 15 MeV HERMES III ion beam. AIP Adv. **10**(12), 125106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023480

333. S. Amaducci et al., Results of the $^{140}$Ce(n, γ)$^{141}$Ce cross-section measurement at n_TOF. Universe (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7060200

334. G. Tagliente, P.M. Milazzo, K. Fujii et al., Neutron capture on $^{94}$Zr: resonance parameters and Maxwellian-averaged cross sections. Phys. Rev. C **84**, 015801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.015801

335. F.-K. Thielemann et al., Neutron star mergers and nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. **67**, 253-274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123246. arXiv:1710.02142 [astro-ph.HE]

336. E. Pian, P. D'Avanzo et al., Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger. Nature **551**(7678), 67-70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24298. arXiv:1710.05858 [astro-ph.HE]

337. B.D. Metzger, G. Martínez-Pinedo, S. Darbha, E. Quataert et al., Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. **406**(4), 2650-2662 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x

338. B.D. Metzger, Kilonovae. Living Rev. Relat. **23**(1), 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

339. S. Rosswog, The multi-messenger picture of compact binary mergers. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D **24**(05), 1530012 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815300128

340. M. Tanaka, D. Kato et al., Systematic opacity calculations for kilonovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. **496**(2), 1369-1392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1576. arXiv:1906.08914 [astro-ph.HE]

341. J.J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J.E. Lawler, A. Aprahamian, M. Wiescher, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F.-K. Thielemann, Origin of the heaviest elements: the rapid neutron-capture process. Rev. Mod. Phys. **93**, 015002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015002

342. A. Pidatella, et al., In-plasma study of opacity relevant for compact binary ejecta. Nuovo Cimento C (2021). https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2021-21065-x

343. A. Pidatella et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of magneto-plasma optical properties toward measurements of opacity relevant for compact binary objects. Front. Astron. Sp. Sci. **9**, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.931744

344. J. Lippuner, L.F. Roberts, SkyNet: a modular nuclear reaction network library. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **233**(2), 18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa94cb

345. M. La Cognata, A. Del Zoppo et al., Solving the large discrepancy between inclusive and exclusive measurements of the $^{8}$Li + $^{4}$He → $^{11}$B + n reaction cross section at astrophysical energies. Astrophys. J. Lett. **706**(2), 251-255 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L251. arXiv:0911.2585 [astro-ph.SR]

346. B.S. Meyer, G.J. Mathews, W.M. Howard, S.E. Woosley, R.D. Hoffman, R-process nucleosynthesis in the high-entropy supernova bubble. Astrophys. J. **399**, 656 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1086/171957

347. Y.-Z. Qian, G. Wasserburg, Where, oh where has the r-process gone? Phis. Rep. **442**, 237-268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.006

348. A. Arcones, F. Montes, Production of light-element primary process nuclei in neutrino-driven winds. Astrophys. J. **731**(1), 5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/5. arXiv:1007.1275 [astro-ph.GA]

349. A. Arcones, J. Bliss, Nucleosynthesis of elements between sr and ag in neutron- and proton-rich neutrino-driven winds. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. **41**(4), 044005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/41/4/044005

350. J. Pereira, F. Montes, Theoretical uncertainty of ($\alpha$, n) reactions relevant for the nucleosynthesis of light r-process nuclei in neutrino-driven winds. Phys. Rev. C **93**, 034611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034611

351. J. Bliss et al., Impact of ($\alpha$, n) reactions on weak r-process in neutrino-driven winds. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. **44**(5), 054003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa63bd. arXiv:1612.02435 [astro-ph.SR]

352. P. Mohr, Role of ($\alpha$, n) reactions under r-process conditions in neutrino-driven winds reexamined. Phys. Rev. C **94**, 035801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.035801
318. N. Nishimura et al., Uncertainties in s-process nucleosynthesis in massive stars determined by Monte Carlo variations. Mon. Not. RAS **469**(2), 1752-1767 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx696. arXiv:1701.00489 [astro-ph.SR]

319. F. Käppeler, R. Gallino, S. Bisterzo et al., The s process: nuclear physics, stellar models, and observations. Rev. Mod. Phys. **83**(1), 157-194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.157. arXiv:1012.5218 [astro-ph.SR]

320. S. Palmerini, M. Busso, D. Vescovi, E. Naselli, A. Pidatella, R. Mucciola et al., Presolar grain isotopic ratios as constraints to nuclear and stellar parameters of asymptotic giant branch star nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. **921**(1), 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1786. arXiv:2107.12037 [astro-ph.SR]

321. M. La Cognata, C. Spitaleri, O. Trippella, G.G. Kiss, G.V. Rogachev, A.M. Mukhamedzhanov et al., On the measurement of the $^{13}$C($\alpha$, n)$^{16}$O S-factor at negative energies and its influence on the s-process. Astrophys. J. **777**(2), 143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/143

322. P. Adsley et al., Reevaluation of the $^{22}$Ne($\alpha$, γ)$^{26}$Mg and $^{22}$Ne($\alpha$, n)$^{25}$Mg reaction rates. Phys. Rev. C **103**(1), 015805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.015805. arXiv:2005.14482 [nucl-ex]

323. A. Best, M. Beard, J. Görres et al., Measurement of the reaction $^{17}$O($\alpha$, n)$^{20}$Ne and its impact on the s process in massive stars. Phys. Rev. C **87**(4), 045805 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.045805. arXiv:1304.6443 [nucl-ex]

324. M.L. Sergi, G. D'Agata, G.L. Guardo, G.G. Rapisarda et al., Trojan Horse investigation for AGB stellar nucleosynthesis. Universe **8**(2), 128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8020128

325. A. Tumino et al., The Trojan Horse method: a nuclear physics tool for astrophysics. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. **71**(1), 345-376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-033642

326. P. Adsley et al., High-resolution study of levels in the astrophysically important nucleus $^{26}$Mg and resulting updated level assignments. Phys. Rev. C **97**, 045807 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.045807

327. I. Dillmann, T. Szücs, R. Plag et al., The Karlsruhe astrophysical database of nucleosynthesis in stars project—status and prospects. Nucl. Data Sheets **120**, 171-174 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.038

328. I.S. Anderson et al., Research opportunities with compact accelerator-driven neutron sources. Phys. Rep. **654**, 1-58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.007. Research opportunities with compact accelerator-driven neutron sources

329. J. Praena, P.F. Mastinu, G.M. Hernández, A method to obtain a Maxwell-Boltzmann neutron spectrum at $kT = 30$ keV for nuclear astrophysics studies. Public. Astron. Soc. Aust. **26**(3), 225-231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1071/AS08043

330. G. Gyürky et al., The activation method for cross section measurements in nuclear astrophysics. Eur. Phys. J. A **55**(3), 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12708-4. arXiv:1903.03339 [nucl-ex]

331. A. Alejo, H. Ahmed, A. Green, S.R. Mirfayzi et al., Recent advances in laser-driven neutron sources. Nuovo Cim. C Geophys. Sp. Phys. C **38**, 188 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2015-15188-8

332. T.J. Renk, P.F. Ottinger, R.E. Durrer, Production of pulsed high-energy neutron bursts from beam-target interaction using a 15 MeV HERMES III ion beam. AIP Adv. **10**(12), 125106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023480

333. S. Amaducci et al., Results of the $^{140}$Ce(n, γ)$^{141}$Ce cross-section measurement at n_TOF. Universe (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7060200

334. G. Tagliente, P.M. Milazzo, K. Fujii et al., Neutron capture on $^{94}$Zr: resonance parameters and Maxwellian-averaged cross sections. Phys. Rev. C **84**, 015801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.015801

335. F.-K. Thielemann et al., Neutron star mergers and nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. **67**, 253-274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123246. arXiv:1710.02142 [astro-ph.HE]

336. E. Pian, P. D'Avanzo et al., Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger. Nature **551**(7678), 67-70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24298. arXiv:1710.05858 [astro-ph.HE]

337. B.D. Metzger, G. Martínez-Pinedo, S. Darbha, E. Quataert et al., Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. **406**(4), 2650-2662 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x

338. B.D. Metzger, Kilonovae. Living Rev. Relat. **23**(1), 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0

339. S. Rosswog, The multi-messenger picture of compact binary mergers. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D **24**(05), 1530012 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815300128

340. M. Tanaka, D. Kato et al., Systematic opacity calculations for kilonovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. **496**(2), 1369-1392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1576. arXiv:1906.08914 [astro-ph.HE]

341. J.J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J.E. Lawler, A. Aprahamian, M. Wiescher, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F.-K. Thielemann, Origin of the heaviest elements: the rapid neutron-capture process. Rev. Mod. Phys. **93**, 015002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015002

342. A. Pidatella, et al., In-plasma study of opacity relevant for compact binary ejecta. Nuovo Cimento C (2021). https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2021-21065-x

343. A. Pidatella et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of magneto-plasma optical properties toward measurements of opacity relevant for compact binary objects. Front. Astron. Sp. Sci. **9**, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.931744

344. J. Lippuner, L.F. Roberts, SkyNet: a modular nuclear reaction network library. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. **233**(2), 18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa94cb

345. M. La Cognata, A. Del Zoppo et al., Solving the large discrepancy between inclusive and exclusive measurements of the $^{8}$Li+$^{4}$He → $^{11}$B+n reaction cross section at astrophysical energies. Astrophys. J. Lett. **706**(2), 251-255 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L251. arXiv:0911.2585 [astro-ph.SR]

346. B.S. Meyer, G.J. Mathews, W.M. Howard, S.E. Woosley, R.D. Hoffman, R-process nucleosynthesis in the high-entropy supernova bubble. Astrophys. J. **399**, 656 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1086/171957

347. Y.-Z. Qian, G. Wasserburg, Where, oh where has the r-process gone? Phis. Rep. **442**, 237-268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.006

348. A. Arcones, F. Montes, Production of light-element primary process nuclei in neutrino-driven winds. Astrophys. J. **731**(1), 5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/5. arXiv:1007.1275 [astro-ph.GA]

349. A. Arcones, J. Bliss, Nucleosynthesis of elements between sr and ag in neutron- and proton-rich neutrino-driven winds. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. **41**(4), 044005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/41/4/044005

350. J. Pereira, F. Montes, Theoretical uncertainty of ($\alpha$, n) reactions relevant for the nucleosynthesis of light r-process nuclei in neutrino-driven winds. Phys. Rev. C **93**, 034611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034611

351. J. Bliss et al., Impact of ($\alpha$, n) reactions on weak r-process in neutrino-driven winds. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. **44**(5), 054003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa63bd. arXiv:1612.02435 [astro-ph.SR]

352. P. Mohr, Role of ($\alpha$, n) reactions under r-process conditions in neutrino-driven winds reexamined. Phys. Rev. C **94**, 035801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.035801
353. G.G. Kiss, P. Mohr, Z. Fülöp, T. Rauscher, G. Gyürky, T. Szücs, Z. Halász, E. Somorjai, A. Ornelas, C. Yalçın, R.T. Gûray, N. Özkan, High precision $^{113}$In($\alpha$, $\alpha^3$)$^{113}$In elastic scattering at energies near the coulomb barrier for the astrophysical $\gamma$ process. Phys. Rev. C **88**, 045804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.045804

354. A. Palumbo, W.P. Tan, J. Görres et al., Systematic study of the $\alpha$-optical potential via elastic scattering near the $z=50$ region for p-process nuclei. Phys. Rev. C **85**, 035808 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035808

355. D. Galaviz, Z. Fülöp et al., Elastic $\alpha$ scattering on $^{112}$Sn and $^{124}$Sn at astrophysically relevant energies. Phys. Rev. C **71**, 065802 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.065802

356. G.G. Kiss, P. Mohr, Z. Fülöp, G. Gyürky, Z. Elekes et al., Phys. Rev. C **83**, 065807 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.065807

357. S.M. Valle, A. Alexandrov, G. Ambrosi, S. Argir, G. Battistoni, N. Belcari, S. Biondi, M.G. Bisogni, G. Bruni, S. Brambilla, N. Camarlinghi, P. Cerello, E. Ciarrocchi, A. Clozza, G. De Lellis, A. Di Crescenzo, M. Durante, M. Emde, R. Faccini, V. Ferrero, F. Ferroni, C. Finck, M. Francesconi, M. Franchini, L. Galli, M. Garbini, G. Giraudo, R. Hetzel, E. Iarocci, M. Ionica, K. Kanxheri, A. Lauria, C. La Tessa, M. Marafini, I. Mattei, R. Mirabelli, M.C. Montesi, M.C. Morone, M. Morrocchi, S. Muraro, L. Narici, A. Pastore, N. Pastrone, V. Patera, M. Pullia, L. Ramello, V. Rosso, M. Rovituso, C. Sanelli, A. Sarti, G. Sartorelli, O. Sato, A. Schiavi, C. Schuy, E. Scifoni, A. Sciubba, M. Selvi, L. Servoli, M. Sitta, R. Spighi, E. Spiriti, G. Sportelli, A. Stahl, F. Tommasino, G. Traini, M. Vanstalle, M. Villa, U. Weber, A. Zoccoli, Foot: a new experiment to measure nuclear fragmentation at intermediate energies. Perspect. Sci. **12**, 100415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2019.100415

358. O. Sokol et al., Kill painting of hypoxic tumors with multiple ion beams. Phys. Med. Biol. **64**, 045008 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aafe40

359. W. Tinganelli et al., Kill-painting of hypoxic tumours in charged particle therapy. Sci. Rep. **5**, 17016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17016

360. F. Luoni et al., Total nuclear reaction cross-section database for radiation protection in space and heavy-ion therapy applications. New J. Phys. **23**, 101201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac27e1

361. J.W. Norbury et al., Are further cross section measurements necessary for space radiation protection or ion therapy applications? Helium projectiles. Front. Phys. **8**, 565954 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.565954

362. K. Parodi, Experimental study on the feasibility of in-beam PET for accurate monitoring of proton therapy. EEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. **52**(3), 778-786 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2005.850950

363. E.S. Diffenderfer et al., Design, implementation, and in vivo validation of a novel proton flash radiation therapy system. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. **106**, 440-448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049

364. T. Tessonnier et al., Flash dose-rate helium ion beams: first in vitro investigations. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. **111**, 1011-1022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1703

365. R.A. Snavely, Intense high-energy proton beams from petawatt-laser irradiation of solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. **85**, 2945 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2945

366. A. Higginson, Near-100 MeV protons via a laser-driven transparency-enhanced hybrid acceleration scheme. Nat. Commun. **9**(724), 2945 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03063-9

367. A. Macchi, M. Borghesi, M. Passoni, Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. **85**(751), 751-793 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.751

368. X.F. Shen, A. Pukhov, B. Qiao, Monoenergetic high-energy ion source via femtosecond laser interacting with a microtape. Phys. Rev. X **11**, 041002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041002

369. E. Esarey, C.B. Schroeder, W.P. Leemans, Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. **81**, 1229 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

370. L. Labate, D. Palla, D. Panetta, A. Gizzi et al., Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes. Sci. Rep. **10**, 17307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w

371. G. Sarri, D.J. Corvan, W. Schumaker, J.M. Cole, A. Di Piazza et al., Ultrahigh brilliance multi-MeV $\gamma$-ray beams from nonlinear relativistic Thomson scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. **113**, 224801 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.224801

372. A. Alejo, G.M. Samarin, W. Warwick, C. McCluskey et al., Non-invasive characterisation of a laser-driven positron beam. Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. **62**, 055013 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab7e81

373. J. Warwick, T. Dzelzainis, M.E. Dieckmann, W. Schumaker, D. Doria, L. Romagnani, K. Poder, J.M. Cole et al., Experimental observation of a current-driven instability in a neutral electron-positron beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. **119**, 185002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.185002

374. T.L. Audet et al., Ultrashort, MeV-scale laser-plasma positron source for positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams **24**, 073402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.073402

375. D. Panetta, L. Labate, A. Gizzi, P. Russo et al., Numerical simulation of novel concept 4d cardiac microtomography for small rodents based on all-optical Thomson scattering X-Ray sources. Sci. Rep. **9**, 8439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44779-y

376. A. Giulietti, P. Martin et al., Intense $\gamma$-ray source in the giant-dipole-resonance range driven by 10-tw laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. **101**, 105002 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.105002

377. D. Habs, P.G. Thirolf, M. Gross, Introducing the fission-fusion reaction process: using a laser-accelerated th beam to produce neutron-rich nuclei towards the n=126 waiting point of the r-process. Appl. Phys. B **103**, 471-484 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-010-4261-x

378. E. Conard, High intensity accelerator for a wide range of applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A **353**, 1-5 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(94)91589-X

379. E. Lefebvre, Numerical simulation of isotope production for positron emission tomography with laser-accelerated ions. J. Appl. Phys. **100**, 113308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2362908

380. C.-M.C. Ma, T. Lomax, Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy. Med. Phys. **40**, 057301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4802213

381. E. d'Humières, A. Brantov, V.Y. Bychenkov, V.T. Tikhonchuk, Optimization of laser-target interaction for proton acceleration. Phys. Plasmas **20**, 023103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4791655

382. Z. Sun, Review: production of nuclear medicine radioisotopes with ultra-intense lasers. AIP Adv. **11**, 040701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042796

383. A. Zigler, S. Eisenman, M. Botton, E. Nahum, E. Schleifer, A. Baspaly, I. Pomerantz, K.W.D. Ledingham et al., Enhanced proton acceleration by an ultrashort laser interaction with structured dynamic plasma targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. **110**, 215004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215004

384. H. Kierzkowska-Pawlak, J. Tyczkowski, A. Jarota, H. Abramczyk, Hydrogen production in liquid water by femtosecond laser-induced plasma. Appl. Energy **247**, 24-31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.010

385. P.K. Kennedy, D.X. Hammer, B.A. Rockwell, Laser-induced breakdown in aqueous media. Prog. Quantum Electron. **21**, 155-248 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6727(97)00002-5

386. A. De Giacomo, M. Dell'Aglio, R. Gaudiuso, S. Amoruso, O. De Pascale, Effects of the background environment on formation, evolution and emission spectra of laser-induced plasmas. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B **78**, 1-19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2012.10.003
353. G.G. Kiss, P. Mohr, Z. Fülöp, T. Rauscher, G. Gyürky, T. Szücs, Z. Halász, E. Somorjai, A. Ornelas, C. Yalçın, R.T. Gûray, N. Özkan, High precision $^{113}$In($\alpha$, $\alpha^3$)$^{113}$In elastic scattering at energies near the coulomb barrier for the astrophysical $\gamma$ process. Phys. Rev. C **88**, 045804 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.045804

354. A. Palumbo, W.P. Tan, J. Görres et al., Systematic study of the $\alpha$-optical potential via elastic scattering near the $z=50$ region for p-process nuclei. Phys. Rev. C **85**, 035808 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035808

355. D. Galaviz, Z. Fülöp et al., Elastic $\alpha$ scattering on $^{112}$Sn and $^{124}$Sn at astrophysically relevant energies. Phys. Rev. C **71**, 065802 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.065802

356. G.G. Kiss, P. Mohr, Z. Fülöp, G. Gyürky, Z. Elekes et al., Phys. Rev. C **83**, 065807 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.065807

357. S.M. Valle, A. Alexandrov, G. Ambrosi, S. Argir, G. Battistoni, N. Belcari, S. Biondi, M.G. Bisogni, G. Bruni, S. Brambilla, N. Camarlinghi, P. Cerello, E. Ciarrocchi, A. Clozza, G. De Lellis, A. Di Crescenzo, M. Durante, M. Emde, R. Faccini, V. Ferrero, F. Ferroni, C. Finck, M. Francesconi, M. Franchini, L. Galli, M. Garbini, G. Giraudo, R. Hetzel, E. Iarocci, M. Ionica, K. Kanxheri, A. Lauria, C. La Tessa, M. Marafini, I. Mattei, R. Mirabelli, M.C. Montesi, M.C. Morone, M. Morrocchi, S. Muraro, L. Narici, A. Pastore, N. Pastrone, V. Patera, M. Pullia, L. Ramello, V. Rosso, M. Rovituso, C. Sanelli, A. Sarti, G. Sartorelli, O. Sato, A. Schiavi, C. Schuy, E. Scifoni, A. Sciubba, M. Selvi, L. Servoli, M. Sitta, R. Spighi, E. Spiriti, G. Sportelli, A. Stahl, F. Tommasino, G. Traini, M. Vanstalle, M. Villa, U. Weber, A. Zoccoli, Foot: a new experiment to measure nuclear fragmentation at intermediate energies. Perspect. Sci. **12**, 100415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2019.100415

358. O. Sokol et al., Kill painting of hypoxic tumors with multiple ion beams. Phys. Med. Biol. **64**, 045008 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aafe40

359. W. Tinganelli et al., Kill-painting of hypoxic tumours in charged particle therapy. Sci. Rep. **5**, 17016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17016

360. F. Luoni et al., Total nuclear reaction cross-section database for radiation protection in space and heavy-ion therapy applications. New J. Phys. **23**, 101201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac27e1

361. J.W. Norbury et al., Are further cross section measurements necessary for space radiation protection or ion therapy applications? Helium projectiles. Front. Phys. **8**, 565954 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.565954

362. K. Parodi, Experimental study on the feasibility of in-beam PET for accurate monitoring of proton therapy. EEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. **52**(3), 778-786 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2005.850950

363. E.S. Diffenderfer et al., Design, implementation, and in vivo validation of a novel proton flash radiation therapy system. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. **106**, 440-448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049

364. T. Tessonnier et al., Flash dose-rate helium ion beams: first in vitro investigations. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. **111**, 1011-1022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1703

365. R.A. Snavely, Intense high-energy proton beams from petawatt-laser irradiation of solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. **85**, 2945 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2945

366. A. Higginson, Near-100 MeV protons via a laser-driven transparency-enhanced hybrid acceleration scheme. Nat. Commun. **9**(724), 2945 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03063-9

367. A. Macchi, M. Borghesi, M. Passoni, Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. **85**(751), 751-793 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.751

368. X.F. Shen, A. Pukhov, B. Qiao, Monoenergetic high-energy ion source via femtosecond laser interacting with a microtape. Phys. Rev. X **11**, 041002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041002

369. E. Esarey, C.B. Schroeder, W.P. Leemans, Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. **81**, 1229 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

370. L. Labate, D. Palla, D. Panetta, A. Gizzi et al., Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes. Sci. Rep. **10**, 17307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w

371. G. Sarri, D.J. Corvan, W. Schumaker, J.M. Cole, A. Di Piazza et al., Ultrahigh brilliance multi-MeV $\gamma$-ray beams from nonlinear relativistic Thomson scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. **113**, 224801 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.224801

372. A. Alejo, G.M. Samarin, W. Warwick, C. McCluskey et al., Non-invasive characterisation of a laser-driven positron beam. Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. **62**, 055013 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ab7e81

373. J. Warwick, T. Dzelzainis, M.E. Dieckmann, W. Schumaker, D. Doria, L. Romagnani, K. Poder, J.M. Cole et al., Experimental observation of a current-driven instability in a neutral electron-positron beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. **119**, 185002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.185002

374. T.L. Audet et al., Ultrashort, MeV-scale laser-plasma positron source for positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams **24**, 073402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.073402

375. D. Panetta, L. Labate, A. Gizzi, P. Russo et al., Numerical simulation of novel concept 4d cardiac microtomography for small rodents based on all-optical Thomson scattering X-Ray sources. Sci. Rep. **9**, 8439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44779-y

376. A. Giulietti, P. Martin et al., Intense $\gamma$-ray source in the giant-dipole-resonance range driven by 10-tw laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. **101**, 105002 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.105002

377. D. Habs, P.G. Thirolf, M. Gross, Introducing the fission-fusion reaction process: using a laser-accelerated th beam to produce neutron-rich nuclei towards the n=126 waiting point of the r-process. Appl. Phys. B **103**, 471-484 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-010-4261-x

378. E. Conard, High intensity accelerator for a wide range of applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A **353**, 1-5 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(94)91589-X

379. E. Lefebvre, Numerical simulation of isotope production for positron emission tomography with laser-accelerated ions. J. Appl. Phys. **100**, 113308 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2362908

380. C.-M.C. Ma, T. Lomax, Proton and Carbon Ion Therapy. Med. Phys. **40**, 057301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4802213

381. E. d'Humières, A. Brantov, V.Y. Bychenkov, V.T. Tikhonchuk, Optimization of laser-target interaction for proton acceleration. Phys. Plasmas **20**, 023103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4791655

382. Z. Sun, Review: production of nuclear medicine radioisotopes with ultra-intense lasers. AIP Adv. **11**, 040701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042796

383. A. Zigler, S. Eisenman, M. Botton, E. Nahum, E. Schleifer, A. Baspaly, I. Pomerantz, K.W.D. Ledingham et al., Enhanced proton acceleration by an ultrashort laser interaction with structured dynamic plasma targets. Phys. Rev. Lett. **110**, 215004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215004

384. H. Kierzkowska-Pawlak, J. Tyczkowski, A. Jarota, H. Abramczyk, Hydrogen production in liquid water by femtosecond laser-induced plasma. Appl. Energy **247**, 24-31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.010

385. P.K. Kennedy, D.X. Hammer, B.A. Rockwell, Laser-induced breakdown in aqueous media. Prog. Quantum Electron. **21**, 155-248 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6727(97)00002-5

386. A. De Giacomo, M. Dell'Aglio, R. Gaudiuso, S. Amoruso, O. De Pascale, Effects of the background environment on formation, evolution and emission spectra of laser-induced plasmas. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B **78**, 1-19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2012.10.003
387. F. Liu, S. Yuan, Z. Zuo, W. Li, L.E. Ding, H. Zeng, Laser filamentation induced bubbles and their motion in water. Opt. Express **24**, 13258–13263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.013258

388. S.L. Chin, S. Lagacé, Generation of H2, O2, and H2O2 from water by the use of intense femtosecond laser pulses and the possibility of laser sterilization. Appl. Opt. **35**, 907–911 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.000907

389. G. Maatz, A. Heisterkamp, H. Lubatschowski, S. Barcikowski, C. Fallnich, H. Welling, W. Ertmer, Chemical and physical side effects at application of ultrashort laser pulses for intrastromal refractive surgery. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. **2**, 59 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/2/1/311

390. A. Kuwahara, Y. Mizushima, M. Matsui, T. Kozuka, N. Mase, Electrodeless hydrogen production from seawater using femtosecond laser pulses. RSC Adv. **12**, 9304–9309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA01337A

391. S. Manservisi, V.G. Molinari, Charged-particle distribution in velocity, angle and time by Fokker-Planck equation. Il Nuovo Cim. D **14**, 9–25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455340

392. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, L. Neri, L. Celona, A new numerical description of the interaction of an ion beam with a magnetized plasma in an ECR-based charge breeding device. Plasma Sour. Sci. Technol. **25**, 045007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/4/045007

393. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, G. Torrisi, L. Neri, L. Celona, J. Angot, Influence of the injected beam parameters on the capture efficiency of an electron cyclotron resonance based charge breeder. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams **20**, 063401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.063401

394. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, C.S. Gallo, G. Torrisi, Self-consistent modeling of beam-plasma interaction in the charge breeding optimization process. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **91**(1), 013506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5130704

395. S. Manservisi, V.G. Molinari, Slowing-down time of fast electrons in plasmas via the Fokker-Planck equation. Nucl. Sci. Eng. **112**, 296–300 (1992). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23979

396. M.E. Jones, J.M. Lemons, R.J. Mason, V.A. Thomas, D. Winske, A grid-based Coulomb collision model for PIC codes. J. Comput. Phys. **123**, 169–181 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0014

397. C.K. Birdsall, J.M. Lemons, R.J. Mason, V.A. Thomas, D. Winske, Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, pic-mcc. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. **19**, 65–85 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/27.106800

398. D. Mascali, G. Torrisi, L. Neri, G. Sorbello, G. Castro, L. Celona, S. Gammino, 3D-full wave and kinetics numerical modelling of electron cyclotron resonance ion sources plasma: steps towards self-consistency. Eur. Phys. J. D **69**(1), 27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50168-5

399. G. Torrisi, D. Mascali, G. Sorbello, L. Neri, L. Celona, G. Castro, T. Isernia, S. Gammino, Full-wave FEM simulations of electromagnetic waves in strongly magnetized non-homogeneous plasma. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. **28**(9), 1085–1099 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2014.905245

400. G. Torrisi, D. Mascali, A. Galatà, L. Celona, G. Mauro, E. Naselli, G. Sorbello, S. Gammino, Investigation of radiofrequency ion heating in the magnetoplasma of an ECR ion trap, in *2019 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA)* (2019), pp. 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAA.2019.8879288

401. G.S. Mauro, G. Torrisi, A. Pidatella, A. Galatà, D. Mascali, Numerical Design of RF Antennas for Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating in ECRIS Environment, in *2021 19th International Conference on Ion Sources (ICIS2021)* (2022), J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. **2244**, 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2244/1/012023

402. G. Ciullo, R. Engels, M. Buescher, A. Vasilyev, Nuclear Fusion with Polarized Fuel. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39471-8

403. A. Solovey, A. Andreyanov, L. Barion, G. Ciullo, R. Engels, V. Fotyev, K. Ivshin, L. Kochenda, P. Kravchenko, P. Kravtsov, V. Larionov, A. Rozhdestvensky, S. Sherman, I. Solovyev, V. Trofimov, A. Vasilyev, M. Vznuzdaev, Optimization and first tests of the experimental setup to investigate the double-polarized DD-fusion reactions. J. Instrum. **15**(8), 08003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/08/C08003. arXiv:2006.09816 [physics.ins-det]

404. S.J. Zweben, T.W. Kornack, D. Majeski, G. Schilling, C.H. Skinner, R. Wilson, N. Kuzma, Evaluation of possible nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic techniques for tokamak experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **74**(3), 1460–1464 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1530388

405. F. Bombarda, A. Cardinali, C. Castaldo, Relevant spatial and time scales in tokamaks. Springer Proc. Phys. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39471-8_6

406. D. Mascali, A. Galatà, S. Gallo, O. Leonardi, G.S. Mauro, E. Naselli, A. Pidatella, F. Russo, G. Sorbello, G. Torrisi, Redefining plasma chambers for ECR ion sources: the IRIS structure. J. Phys: Confer. Ser. **2244**(1), 012003 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2244/1/012003

407. L. Celona et al., Observations of the frequency tuning effect in the 14 GHz CAPRICE ion source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **79**, 023305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2841694

408. D. Mascali, E. Naselli, R. Racz et al., Experimental study of single- vs two-close-frequency heating impact on confinement and loss dynamics in ECR ion source plasmas by means of X-ray spectroscopy and imaging. Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. **64**, 035020 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ac4349

409. E. Naselli, R. Racz, S. Biri, M. Mazzaglia, A. Galatà, D. Mascali et al., Quantitative analysis of an ECR Ar plasma structure by X-ray spectroscopy at high spatial resolution. JINST **17**, 01009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/01/C01009

410. S. Biri et al., Innovative experimental setup for X-ray imaging to study energetic magnetized plasmas. J. Instrum. **16**, 03003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/03/P03003

411. E. Naselli, R. Racz, S. Biri, M. Mazzaglia, A. Galatà, D. Mascali et al., Innovative analytical method for X-ray imaging and space-resolved spectroscopy of ECR plasmas. Condens. Matter **7**(1), 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat7010005
387. F. Liu, S. Yuan, Z. Zuo, W. Li, L.E. Ding, H. Zeng, Laser filamentation induced bubbles and their motion in water. Opt. Express **24**, 13258–13263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.013258

388. S.L. Chin, S. Lagacé, Generation of H2, O2, and H2O2 from water by the use of intense femtosecond laser pulses and the possibility of laser sterilization. Appl. Opt. **35**, 907–911 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.000907

389. G. Maatz, A. Heisterkamp, H. Lubatschowski, S. Barcikowski, C. Fallnich, H. Welling, W. Ertmer, Chemical and physical side effects at application of ultrashort laser pulses for intrastromal refractive surgery. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. **2**, 59 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/2/1/311

390. A. Kuwahara, Y. Mizushima, M. Matsui, T. Kozuka, N. Mase, Electrodeless hydrogen production from seawater using femtosecond laser pulses. RSC Adv. **12**, 9304–9309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA01337A

391. S. Manservisi, V.G. Molinari, Charged-particle distribution in velocity, angle and time by Fokker-Planck equation. Il Nuovo Cim. D **14**, 9–25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02455340

392. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, L. Neri, L. Celona, A new numerical description of the interaction of an ion beam with a magnetized plasma in an ECR-based charge breeding device. Plasma Sour. Sci. Technol. **25**, 045007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/4/045007

393. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, G. Torrisi, L. Neri, L. Celona, J. Angot, Influence of the injected beam parameters on the capture efficiency of an electron cyclotron resonance based charge breeder. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams **20**, 063401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.063401

394. A. Galatà, D. Mascali, C.S. Gallo, G. Torrisi, Self-consistent modeling of beam-plasma interaction in the charge breeding optimization process. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **91**(1), 013506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5130704

395. S. Manservisi, V.G. Molinari, Slowing-down time of fast electrons in plasmas via the Fokker-Planck equation. Nucl. Sci. Eng. **112**, 296–300 (1992). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23979

396. M.E. Jones, J.M. Lemons, R.J. Mason, V.A. Thomas, D. Winske, A grid-based Coulomb collision model for PIC codes. J. Comput. Phys. **123**, 169–181 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0014

397. C.K. Birdsall, J.M. Lemons, R.J. Mason, V.A. Thomas, D. Winske, Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, pic-mcc. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. **19**, 65–85 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/27.106800

398. D. Mascali, G. Torrisi, L. Neri, G. Sorbello, G. Castro, L. Celona, S. Gammino, 3D-full wave and kinetics numerical modelling of electron cyclotron resonance ion sources plasma: steps towards self-consistency. Eur. Phys. J. D **69**(1), 27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50168-5

399. G. Torrisi, D. Mascali, G. Sorbello, L. Neri, L. Celona, G. Castro, T. Isernia, S. Gammino, Full-wave FEM simulations of electromagnetic waves in strongly magnetized non-homogeneous plasma. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. **28**(9), 1085–1099 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2014.905245

400. G. Torrisi, D. Mascali, A. Galatà, L. Celona, G. Mauro, E. Naselli, G. Sorbello, S. Gammino, Investigation of radiofrequency ion heating in the magnetoplasma of an ECR ion trap, in *2019 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA)* (2019), pp. 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAA.2019.8879288

401. G.S. Mauro, G. Torrisi, A. Pidatella, A. Galatà, D. Mascali, Numerical Design of RF Antennas for Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating in ECRIS Environment, in *2021 19th International Conference on Ion Sources (ICIS2021)* (2022), J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. **2244**, 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2244/1/012023

402. G. Ciullo, R. Engels, M. Buescher, A. Vasilyev, Nuclear Fusion with Polarized Fuel. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol. 187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39471-8

403. A. Solovey, A. Andreyanov, L. Barion, G. Ciullo, R. Engels, V. Fotyev, K. Ivshin, L. Kochenda, P. Kravchenko, P. Kravtsov, V. Larionov, A. Rozhdestvensky, S. Sherman, I. Solovyev, V. Trofimov, A. Vasilyev, M. Vznuzdaev, Optimization and first tests of the experimental setup to investigate the double-polarized DD-fusion reactions. J. Instrum. **15**(8), 08003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/08/C08003. arXiv:2006.09816 [physics.ins-det]

404. S.J. Zweben, T.W. Kornack, D. Majeski, G. Schilling, C.H. Skinner, R. Wilson, N. Kuzma, Evaluation of possible nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic techniques for tokamak experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **74**(3), 1460–1464 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1530388

405. F. Bombarda, A. Cardinali, C. Castaldo, Relevant spatial and time scales in tokamaks. Springer Proc. Phys. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39471-8_6

406. D. Mascali, A. Galatà, S. Gallo, O. Leonardi, G.S. Mauro, E. Naselli, A. Pidatella, F. Russo, G. Sorbello, G. Torrisi, Redefining plasma chambers for ECR ion sources: the IRIS structure. J. Phys: Confer. Ser. **2244**(1), 012003 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2244/1/012003

407. L. Celona et al., Observations of the frequency tuning effect in the 14 GHz CAPRICE ion source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. **79**, 023305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2841694

408. D. Mascali, E. Naselli, R. Racz et al., Experimental study of single- vs two-close-frequency heating impact on confinement and loss dynamics in ECR ion source plasmas by means of X-ray spectroscopy and imaging. Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. **64**, 035020 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ac4349

409. E. Naselli, R. Racz, S. Biri, M. Mazzaglia, A. Galatà, D. Mascali et al., Quantitative analysis of an ECR Ar plasma structure by X-ray spectroscopy at high spatial resolution. JINST **17**, 01009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/01/C01009

410. S. Biri et al., Innovative experimental setup for X-ray imaging to study energetic magnetized plasmas. J. Instrum. **16**, 03003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/03/P03003

411. E. Naselli, R. Racz, S. Biri, M. Mazzaglia, A. Galatà, D. Mascali et al., Innovative analytical method for X-ray imaging and space-resolved spectroscopy of ECR plasmas. Condens. Matter **7**(1), 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat7010005