Referencias

Alvarez S., Jost C.C., Schuetz T., Förch W., Schubert C., Kristjanson P., 2014. Lessons in Theory of Change from the introductory training on Theories of Change, Impact Pathways and Monitoring & Evaluation, CCSL Learning Brief 10, 4 p., https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/52992.

Arnstein Sherry R. (1969), «A Ladder of Citizen Participation», Journal of American Institute of Planners, n°35/4, pp.216-224.

Barret Danielle, Blundo Canto Genowefa, Dabat Marie-Hélène, Devaux-Spatarakis Agathe, Faure Guy, Hainzelin Etienne, Mathé Syndhia, Temple Ludovic, Toillier Aurélie, Triomphe Bernard, Vall Eric. 2017. Guide méthodologique ImpresS. Évaluation ex post des impacts de la recherche agronomique dans les pays du Sud. Montpellier: CIRAD, 96 p. ISBN 978-2-87614-731-7 https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00005

Barnett. I. and Pananen (2019) Supporting Adaptive Management: Monitoring and Evaluation Tools and Approaches, Working paper 569, ODI

Blundo-Canto G, Läderach P, Waldock J, Camacho K. 2017. Learning through monitoring, evaluation and adaptations of the «Outcome Harvesting» tool. Cah. Agric. 26: 65004.

Blundo Canto G., Barret D., Faure G., Hainzelin E., Monier C., Triomphe B., Vall E. (ilus.), 2018. ImpresS ex ante. Une proposition de démarche pour construire ex ante les chemins de l'impact. Montpellier, Francia: Cirad, 64 p. ISBN: 978-2-87614-734-8. https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00010

Blundo-Canto, G., Triomphe, B., Faure, G., Barret, D., de Romemont, A., Hainzelin, E., 2018. Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning. Research Evaluation. 28(2):f 136-144, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy033

Borgatti, S.P., 2002. NetDraw Software for Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies: Lexington, KY. Obtido de: https://sites.google.com/site/netdrawsoftware/download

Bourgeois, R., Penunia, E., Bisht, S., & Boruk, D. (2017). Foresight for all: Co-elaborative scenario building and empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124(2017), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.018

Chevalier J.M.,Buckles D.J.,2008.SAS2: Guide sur la recherche collaborative et l'engagement social ESKA,CRDI, 328 p., https://www.idrc.ca/fr/book/sas2-guide-sur-la-recherche-collaborative-et-lengagement-social.

Collectif Anticipation-ImpresS ex ante, note méthodologique 2020.

Dabat M-H, Grandjean A. 2018. Comment les acteurs publics contribuent à l'impact de la recherche dans les pays en développement. Cah. Agric. 27: 15013. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018003

Daré W., Ducrot R., Botta A., Etienne M., 2009. Repères méthodologiques pour la mise en œuvre d'une démarche de modélisation d'accompagnement. Cardère, Laudun, 127 p

Devaux-Spatarakis A., Barret D., Bouyer J., Cerdan C., Dabat M-H., Faure G., Ferré T., Hainzelin E., Medah I., Temple L., Triomphe B., 2016. How Can International Agricultural Research Better Contribute to Inno-vations: Lessons from Impact Pathways Analysis. In Communication to 12th European IFSA Symposium «Social and Technological Transformation of Farming Systems: Diverging and Converging Pathways,» 14. IFSA, http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582679/1/IFSAlessons form impact pathways analysis CIRAD.pdf.

Douthwaite, B., S. Alvarez, K. Tehelen, D. Cordoba, G. Thiele and R. Mackay 2008. Participatory impact pathway analysis: A practical method for project planning and evaluation. In: Fighting poverty through sustainable wateruse. Proceedings of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food 2nd International Forum on Water and Food, Vol. 4, Addis Ababa, Etiopía, 10-14 Noviembre 2008, eds. R.S. Bayot and E. Humphreys; 31. Colombo, Sri Lanka: CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food

Douthwaite, B.; Alvarez, S.; Cook, S.; Davies, R.; George, Pamela; Howell, J.; Mackay, R.; Rubiano, J. 2007. Participatory impact pathways analysis: a practical application of program theory in research-for-development. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22(2):127-159.

Douthwaite B., Mur R., Audouin S., Wopereis M., Hellin J., Moussa A.S., Karbo N., Kasten W., Bouyer J., 2017. Agricultural Research for Development to Intervene Effectively in Complex Systems and the Implications for Research Organizations. Working Paper 12, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 20 p.

Durland M.A., Fredericks K.A., 2005. An introduction to social network analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 107, 5-13.

Earl S., Carden F., Smutylo T., 2001. Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 120 p.
Etienne M. (editors). 2014. Companion Modelling. A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development. QUAE éditions version anglaise Springer Editor

Faure G., Gasselin P., Triomphe B., Temple L., Hocdé H., 2010. Innover avec les acteurs du monde rural: la recherche-action en partenariat, Quæ, Versailles, 224 p.

Faure G., Barret D., Blundo-Canto G., Dabat MH, Devaux-Spatarakis A., Le Guerroué J.L., Marquié C., Mathé S., Temple L.,Toillier A., Triomphe B., Hainzelin E. (2018) How different agricultural research models contribute to impacts: Evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries, Agricultural Systems, 165, 128-136.

Faure Guy, Blundo Canto Genowefa, Devaux-Spatarakis Agathe, Le Guérroue Jean-Louis, Mathe Syndhia, Temple Ludovic, Toillier Aurélie, Triomphe Bernard, Hainzelin Etienne. 2020. A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries. Research Evaluation: rvz036, 13 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz036

Fetterman, D. (2017). Transformative empowerment evaluation and Freirean pedagogy:Alignment with an emancipatory tradition. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Pedagogy of Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 155, 111-126.

Funnell SC & Rogers PJ. 2011. Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Hainzelin E., Barret D., Faure G., Triomphe B., Dabat M-H., 2017. Recherche agricole dans les pays du Sud: dépasser la promesse de l'impact pour piloter la recherche. Perspective 42, Cirad, Montpellier, 4 p.

Mayers J., 2005. Stakeholder Power Analysis, Power Tools, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 24 p., http://www.policy-powertools.org/Tools/Understanding/docs/stakeholder_power_tool_english.pdf.

Mayne J., 2015. Useful Theory of Change Models. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30 (2), 119-42, doi:10.3138/cjpe.230.

Mayne J., Johnson N., 2015. Using Theories of Change in the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Mayne, J. 2017. Theory of change Analysis: building robust Theories of Change. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32 (2), 155-173 doi: 10.3138/cjpe.31122

Mayne, J. 2017. The ComB Theory of Change Model, V3.

Miller R., Poli R., and Rossel P. 2018. The Discipline of Anticipation in Miller R. (Ed). Transforming the future: anticipation in the 21st century. Unesco and Routledge. 301 p. ISBN 978-92-3-100268-7

Montague, S., Young, G., & Montague, C. 2003. Using circles to tell the performance story. Canadian government executive, 2, 12-16. Available at: http://www.pmn.net/wp-content/uploads/Using-Circles-to-Tell-the-Performance-Story.pdf

Peersman, G., Rogers, P., Guijt, I., Hearn, S., Pasanen, T., and Buffardi, A. (2016) ‘When and how to develop an impact-oriented monitoring and evaluation system’. A Methods Lab publication. London: Overseas Development Institute.

Plateforme pour l'agriculture tropicale (2016) Cadre commun de travail pour le renforcement des capacités des systèmes d'innovation agricole: Document de synthèse. CAB International, Wallingford, Royaume-Uni

Rossel P. 2010. Making anticipatory systems more robust, Foresight, 12(3), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681011049893

Schiffer E., Hauck J., 2010. Net-map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Method, 22 (3), 231-249.

SETIG (Systems in Evaluation Topical Interest Group of the American Evaluation Association), 2018. Principles for Effective Use of Systems Thinking in Evaluation Practice.

Temple L., Barret D., Blundo Canto G., Dabat M-H., Devaux-Spatarakis A., Faure G., Hainzelin E., Mathé S., Toillier A., Triomphe B., 2018. Assessing Impacts of Agricultural Research for Development: a systemic model focusing on outcomes. «Forthcoming» in Research Evaluation (in press).

Von Schomberg, René (2013). «A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation» (PDF). Responsible Innovation. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 51-74. doi:10.1002/9781118551424.ch3. ISBN 9781119966364.

Weiss C. 1995. Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: Connell JP, editor. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; 1995. p. 65-92.8
<figure><img src="image_38.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_39.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_40.png" /></figure>

impresS
IMPACT OF RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH

https://impress-impact-recherche.cirad.fr/