South China Sea Rifted Margin

Zhen Sun, Zhimin Jian, Joann M. M Stock, Hans-Christian Larsen, Adam

Klaus, Carlos A. Alvarez Zarikian, Anne Briais

► To cite this version:

Zhen Sun, Zhimin Jian, Joann M. M Stock, Hans-Christian Larsen, Adam Klaus, et al.. South China Sea Rifted Margin. 367/368, 2018, Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.2018 . hal-02352167

HAL Id: hal-02352167

https://hal.science/hal-02352167v1

Submitted on 12 Nov 2019

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program

## Volume 367/368

### South China Sea Rifted Margin

Expeditions 367 and 368 of the riserless drilling platform
from and to Hong Kong, China

Sites U1499–U1500

7 February–9 April 2017

and

Hong Kong, China, to Shanghai, China

Sites U1501–U1505

9 April–11 June 2017

### Volume authorship

Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
## Publisher's notes

This publication was prepared by the JOIDES Resolution Science Operator (JRSO) at Texas A&M University (TAMU) as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for IODP is provided by the following international partners:

* National Science Foundation (NSF), United States

* Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan

* European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD)

* Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People's Republic of China

* Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)

* Australia-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC)

* Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India

* Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the participating agencies, TAMU, or Texas A&M Research Foundation.

The bulk of the shipboard-collected core data from this expedition is accessible at http://iodp.tamu.edu/database/index.html. If you cannot access this site or need additional data, please contact Data Librarian, International Ocean Discovery Program JOIDES Resolution Science Operator, Texas A&M University, 1000 Discovery Drive, College Station TX 77845-9547, USA. Tel: (979) 845-8495; Fax: (979) 458-1617; Email: database@iodp.tamu.edu.

A complete set of the logging data collected during the expedition is available at http://mlp.ldeo.columbia.edu/logdb/scientific_ocean_drilling. If you have problems downloading the data, wish to receive additional logging data, or have questions regarding the data, please contact Database Administrator, Borehole Research Group, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, PO Box 1000, 61 Route 9W, Palisades NY 10964, USA. Tel: (845) 365-8343; Fax: (845) 365-3182; Email: logdb@ldeo.columbia.edu.

Supplemental data were provided by the authors and may not conform to IODP publication formats.

JRSO expedition photos are the property of IODP and are public access.

Some core photographs have been tonally enhanced to better illustrate particular features of interest. High-resolution images are available upon request.

Cover photograph shows the R/V JOIDES Resolution on site in the South China Sea during Expe-
dition 368. Photo credit: Shuhao Xie and IODP JRSO.

## Copyright

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction are permitted, provided the original author and source are credited.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

Examples of how to cite this volume or part of this volume are available at http://publica-
tions.iodp.org/proceedings/367_368/367368title.html#bib.

## ISSN

World Wide Web: 2377-3189

## Volume DOI

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.2018

## Publication date

28 September 2018
# Contents

## Expedition reports

### Chapters

**Expedition 367/368 summary**

H.C. Larsen et al.

**Expedition 367/368 methods**

Z. Sun et al.

**Site U1499**

Z. Sun et al.

**Site U1500**

J.M. Stock et al.

**Site U1501**

H.C. Larsen et al.

**Site U1502**

H.C. Larsen et al.

**Site U1503**

H.C. Larsen et al.

**Site U1504**

H.C. Larsen et al.

**Site U1505**

Z. Jian et al.

### Core descriptions

Visual core descriptions (VCDs) are presented in PDF files for each site. Smear slides and/or thin sections are presented in PDF and/or CSV files for each site and/or hole (CSV files are available in the CORES directory). The entire set of core images in PDF is available in the IMAGES directory.

**Site U1499**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides · **Thin sections**

**Site U1500**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides · **Thin sections**

**Site U1501**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides · **Thin sections**

**Site U1502**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides · **Thin sections**

**Site U1503**

**Visual core descriptions**

**Site U1504**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides · **Thin sections**

**Site U1505**

**Visual core descriptions** · Smear slides

### Supplementary material

Supplementary material for the Volume 367/368 expedition reports includes DESClogik workbooks in Microsoft Excel format, an original seismic section figure in PDF and Adobe Illustrator format, downhole measurement data in PDF, and captions in Microsoft Word format. A full list of directories can be found in SUPP/mat in the volume zip folder or on the **Supplementary material for Volume 367/368 expedition reports** web page.

## Expedition research results

### Data reports

Titles are available in HTML.

### Syntheses

Titles are available in HTML.

## Drilling location maps

A site map showing the drilling locations for this expedition and maps showing the drilling locations of all International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) expeditions, produced using QGIS (http://www.qgis.org), and all Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), and Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) expeditions, produced using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) of Paul Wessel and Walter H.F. Smith (http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu), are available in PDF.

### IODP Expedition 367/368 site map

**IODP map** (Expeditions 349–357, 359–368, and 370)

**Integrated Ocean Drilling Program map** (Expeditions 301–348)

**ODP map** (Legs 100–210)

**DSDP map** (Legs 1–96)
## Dedication

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

We dedicate this volume to our good friend and colleague Dr. Kirk D. McIntosh who passed away during Expedition 368 at the age of 59. Those who worked closely with Kirk on the years-long preparations for the South China Sea expeditions learned to know him as a person of the finest qualities. His prior work in the region was crucial to the scientific foundation of the project, and the rigor that he applied in processing and interpreting the seismic data greatly helped to shape our final drilling plans. His treatment for leukemia prevented him from sailing with us, but he remained engaged in our discussions even as we sailed. We were devastated by the news of his sudden death. His contributions will not be forgotten. Photo credit: David Stephens, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin.

## Acknowledgments

Complementary Project Proposal (CPP) Expeditions 367 and 368 received generous funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST; China). We are grateful to the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) for their powerful support with the regional deep crustal seismic data on which the entire project builds and to the Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey (GMGS) for releasing high-resolution bathymetry data from around the drilling sites. The success of the expeditions, from proposal preparation to the supporting work related to the expeditions, greatly benefited from support by the IODP-China office and the major research program "The South China Sea Deep" (2011-2018) funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). We express our most sincere thanks to Professor Pinxian Wang, who made it possible to develop the proposal into two CPP expeditions. Professor Chunfeng Li is also greatly appreciated for his contributions to proposal preparation and partial data support.
# Foreword

The International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) represents the latest incarnation of almost five decades of scientific ocean drilling excellence and is generally accepted as the most successful international collaboration in the history of the Earth sciences. IODP builds seamlessly on the accomplishments of previous phases: the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Ocean Drilling Program, and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. The 2013–2023 IODP Science Plan (*Illuminating Earth's Past, Present, and Future*) defines four themes and thirteen challenges for this decade of scientific ocean drilling that are both of fundamental importance in understanding how the Earth works and of significant relevance to society as the Earth changes, at least in part in response to anthropogenic forcing. This phase of IODP represents a renewed level of international collaboration in bringing diverse drilling platforms and strategies to increasing our understanding of climate and ocean change, the deep biosphere and evolution of ecosystems, connections between Earth's deep processes and surface manifestations, and geologically induced hazards on human timeframes.

The *Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program* presents the scientific and engineering results of IODP drilling projects, expedition by expedition. As in the preceding Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, expeditions in the new IODP are conducted by three implementing organizations, each providing a different drilling capability. These are the US Implementing Organization (USIO; through September 2014) and the *JOIDES Resolution* Science Operator (JRSO; as of October 2014), providing the leased commercial vessel *JOIDES Resolution* for riserless drilling operations; JAMSTEC's Center for Deep Earth Exploration (CDEX), providing the drillship *Chikyu* for riser and occasional riserless operations; and the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Science Operator (ESO), providing “mission-specific” platforms (MSPs) for expeditions that extend the IODP operational range where neither drillship is suitable, for example, in polar environments and in shallow waters. Scheduling decisions for each capability are made by three independent Facility Boards, each of which includes scientists, operators, and platform funding partners: the *JOIDES Resolution* Facility Board (JRFB), *Chikyu* IODP Board (CIB), and ECORD Facility Board (EFB). At the beginning of the new IODP, the three Facility Boards agreed to utilize Publication Services at the USIO and now the JRSO for production of all expedition *Proceedings* volumes and reports.

The new IODP differs from prior scientific ocean drilling programs in that it has neither a central management organization nor commingled funding for program-wide activities. Yet this phase of IODP retains a fundamental integrative structural element: a “bottom-up” evaluation of all proposals for drilling expeditions by a single advisory structure composed of scientists representing all international program partners. International scientists may submit drilling proposals to the Science Support Office; all submitted proposals are then evaluated by a Science Evaluation Panel in the context of the Science Plan.

The new IODP also has a second internationally integrative level for high-level discussion and consensus-building: the IODP Forum. The Forum is charged with assessing program-wide progress toward achieving the Science Plan. At present, IODP involves 26 international financial partners, including the United States, Japan, an Australia/New Zealand consortium (ANZIC), Brazil, China, India, South Korea, and the eighteen members of ECORD (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). This enhanced membership in the new IODP represents a remarkable level of international collaboration that remains one of the greatest ongoing strengths of scientific ocean drilling.

James A. Austin Jr.
Chair, IODP Forum
# International Ocean Discovery Program

## JOIDES Resolution Science Operator

Website: http://iodp.tamu.edu

### IODP JRSO

International Ocean Discovery Program
Texas A&M University
1000 Discovery Drive
College Station TX 77845-9547
USA
Tel: (979) 845-2673; Fax: (979) 845-4857
Email: information@iodp.tamu.edu

### IODP JRSO Curation and Laboratories

IODP Gulf Coast Repository (GCR)
Texas A&M University
1000 Discovery Drive
College Station TX 77845-9547
USA
Tel: (979) 845-8490; Fax: (979) 845-1303
Email: rumford@iodp.tamu.edu

## European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling, Science Operator (ESO)

Website: http://www.ecord.org

### IODP ESO Coordinator: Science, Logistics, and Operations

British Geological Survey
The Lyell Centre
Research Avenue South
Edinburgh EH14 4AP
United Kingdom
Tel: (44) 131-667-1000; Fax: (44) 131-668-4140
Email: eso@bgs.ac.uk

### IODP ESO Petrophysics

European Petrophysics Consortium
Department of Geology
University of Leicester
Leicester LE1 7RH
United Kingdom
Tel: (44) 116-252-3611; Fax: (44) 116-252-3918
Email: sjd27@leicester.ac.uk

### IODP ESO Curation and Laboratories

IODP Bremen Core Repository (BCR)
Center for Marine Environmental Sciences (MARUM)
University of Bremen
Leobener Strasse
28359 Bremen
Germany
Tel: (49) 421-218-65560; Fax: (49) 421-218-98-65560
Email: bcr@marum.de

## Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)

Website: http://www.jamstec.go.jp/chikyu/e

### IODP Japan Science Operator

Center for Deep Earth Exploration (CDEX)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Yokohama Institute for Earth Sciences
3175-25 Showa-machi
Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama
Kanagawa 236-0001
Japan
Tel: (81) 45-778-5643; Fax: (81) 45-778-5704
Email: cdex@jamstec.go.jp

### IODP Japan Curation and Laboratories

IODP Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research (KCC)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
200 Monobe Otsu
3175-25 Showa-machi
Nankoku City, Kochi 783-8502
Japan
Tel: (81) 88-864-6705; Fax: (81) 88-878-2192
Email: kcc.contact@jamstec.go.jp
# Expedition 367/368 participants*

## Expedition 367 scientists

**Zhen Sun**

**Co-Chief Scientist**

CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology
South China Sea Institute of Oceanology
China
zhensun@scsio.ac.cn

**Joann M. Stock**

**Co-Chief Scientist**

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
California Institute of Technology
USA
jstock@gps.caltech.edu

**Adam Klaus**

**Expedition Project Manager/Staff Scientist**

International Ocean Discovery Program
Texas A&M University
USA
aklaus@iodp.tamu.edu

**Jacopo Boaga**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Dipartimento di Geoscienze
Università degli Studi di Padova
Italy
jacopo.boaga@unipd.it

**Anne Briais**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Observatoire Midi-Pyrenes
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France
anne.briais@cnrs.fr

**Yifeng Chen**

**Inorganic Geochemist**

Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China
yfchen@gig.ac.cn

**Michael J. Dorais**

**Inorganic Geochemist**

Department of Geological Sciences
Brigham Young University
USA
dorais@byu.edu

**Akira Furusawa**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

Department of Geoscience
Shimane University
Japan
zerozaki.1130@gmail.com

**Jessica L. Hinojosa**

**Sedimentologist**

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
California Institute of Technology
USA

Present affiliation (20 September 2017):
Shell International Exploration and Production
USA
j.hinojosa@shell.com

**Tobias W. Höfig**

**Petrologist**

International Ocean Discovery Program
Texas A&M University
USA
hoefig@iodp.tamu.edu

**Kan-Hsi Hsiung**

**Sedimentologist**

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Japan
hsiung@jamstec.go.jp

**Baoqi Huang**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

Department of Geology
Peking University
China
bqhuang@pku.edu.cn

**Xiao-Long Huang**

**Petrologist**

Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China
xlhuang@gig.ac.cn

**Benjamin G. Johnson**

**Sedimentologist**

Geology and Geography
West Virginia University
USA
bgjohnson@mix.wvu.edu

**Chao Lei**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Department of Marine Science
College of Marine Science and Technology
China University of Geosciences in Wuhan
China
clei@cug.edu.cn

<footnote>*Affiliations at time of expedition, except where updated by participants.</footnote>
Li Li

Organic Geochemist

State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology
Tongji University
China
lilitju@tongji.edu.cn

Zhifei Liu

Sedimentologist

State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology
Tongji University
China
lzhifei@tongji.edu.cn

Antonio Luna

Petrologist

Department of Geology
University of South Florida, Tampa
USA
aluna2@mail.usf.edu

Claudia Lupi

Paleontologist (nannofossils)

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Italy
claudia.lupi@unipv.it

Anders J. McCarthy

Petrologist

Institute of Earth Sciences
University of Lausanne
Switzerland
anders.mccarthy@unil.ch

Michael Nirrengarten

Structural Geologist

Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg
France

Present affiliation (20 September 2017):
Laboratoire Géosciences et Environnement Cergy (GEC)
Maison Internationale de la Recherche
Université de Cergy-Pontoise
France
michael.nirrengarten@u-cergy.fr

Caroline M. Robinson

Sedimentologist

School of Earth Sciences
Ohio State University
USA
robinson.2071@osu.edu

Isabel Sauermilch

Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS)
University of Tasmania
Australia
isabel.sauermilch@utas.edu.au

Steven M. Skinner

Paleomagnetist

Department of Geology
California State University, Sacramento
USA
steven.skinner@csus.edu

Xiang Su

Paleontologist (nannofossils)

CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology
South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences
China
suxiang@scsio.ac.cn

Rong Xiang

Paleontologist (foraminifers)

CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology
South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences
China
rxiang@scsio.ac.cn

Rajeev Yadav

Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist

Department of Marine Geophysics
National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research (NCAOR)
India
ryadav@ncaor.gov.in

Liang Yi

Paleomagnetist

State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology
Tongji University
China
yi.liang82@gmail.com

Cuimei Zhang

Structural Geologist

CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology
South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences
China
cmzhang@scsio.ac.cn

Jinchang Zhang

Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist

CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology
South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences
China
jzhang@scsio.ac.cn

Yang Zhang

Paleomagnetist

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Purdue University
USA
zhan2214@purdue.edu
**Ning Zhao**

**Sedimentologist**

Department of Geology and Geophysics
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
USA

Present affiliation (20 September 2017):
Department of Geology and Geophysics
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Germany
**ningzhao2009@hotmail.com**

## Expedition 367 observer

**Chih-Chieh Su**

**Sedimentologist/Observer**

Institute of Oceanography
National Taiwan University
Taiwan
**donccsu@ntu.edu.tw**

## Expedition 367 education and outreach

**Alessia Cicconi**

**Education/Outreach Officer**

Liceo Classico "F. Stabili - E. Trebbiani" Ascoli Piceno
School of Science and Technology
Geology Division
University of Camerino
Italy
**alessia.cicconi@unicam.it**

## Expedition 368 scientists

**Zhimin Jian**

**Co-Chief Scientist**

School of Ocean and Earth Science
Tongji University
China
**jian@tongji.edu.cn**

**Hans Christian Larsen**

**Co-Chief Scientist**

Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Denmark
**hclarseniodp@gmail.com**

Also at:
Tongji University
China

**Carlos A. Alvarez Zarikian**

**Expedition Project Manager/Staff Scientist**

International Ocean Discovery Program
Texas A&M University
USA
**zarikian@iodp.tamu.edu**

**Stephen A. Bowden**

**Organic Geochemist**

School of Geosciences
University of Aberdeen
United Kingdom
**s.a.bowden@abdn.ac.uk**

**Lifeng Zhong**

**Petrologist**

School of Marine Sciences
Sun Yat-Sen University
China
**zhonglf@scsio.ac.cn**

**Jiansong Zhang**

**Education/Outreach Officer**

China
**13311669691@163.com**

**Deniz Cukur**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Marine Geology Department
Petroleum & Marine Research Division
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)
Republic of Korea
**dcukur@kigam.re.kr**

**Kelsie A. Dadd**

**Sedimentologist**

School of Geosciences
University of Sydney
Australia
**kelsie.dadd@sydney.edu.au**

**Weiwei Ding**

**Structural Geologist**

Key Laboratory of Submarine Geoscience
Second Institute of Oceanography (SIO), State Oceanic Administration (SOA)
China
**wwding@sio.org.cn**

**Eric C. Ferré**

**Paleomagnetist**

Department of Geology
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
USA
**eferre@geo.siu.edu**
**Fabricio Ferreira**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

Institute for Geosciences, Universidade Federal Fluminense
(UFF), Brazil
CAPES Foundation
Ministry of Education of Brazil
ferreira_paleo@hotmail.com

**Aaron J. Gewecke**

**Paleontologist (diatoms)**

Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
USA
aarongewecke@gmail.com

**Enqing Huang**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

School of Ocean and Earth Science
Tongji University
China
ehuang@tongji.edu.cn

**Shijun Jiang**

**Paleontologist (nannofossils)**

College of Life Science and Technology
Jinan University
China
sjiang@jnu.edu.cn

**Haiyan Jin**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology
Tongji University
China
jinhy@tongji.edu.cn

**Robert M. Kurzawski**

**Petrologist/Structural Geologist**

GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Germany
rkurzawski@geomar.de

**Baohua Li**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

Department of Micropalaeontology
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China
bh-li@nigpas.ac.cn

**Yanping Li**

**Inorganic Geochemist**

School of Geographical and Oceanographical Sciences
Nanjing University
China
ypli@nju.edu.cn

**Jian Lin**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Department of Geology and Geophysics
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
USA
jlin@whoi.edu

**Chang Liu**

**Sedimentologist**

Department of Geology and Geophysics
Louisiana State University
USA
cliu14@lsu.edu

**Chuanlian Liu**

**Paleontologist (nannofossils)**

School of Ocean and Earth Science
Tongji University
China
liucl@tongji.edu.cn

**Geoffroy Mohn**

**Petrologist/Structural Geologist**

Laboratoire Géosciences et Environnement Cergy (GEC)
Maison Internationale de la Recherche
Université de Cergy-Pontoise
France
Geoffroy.Mohn@u-cergy.fr

**Lachit Singh Ningthoujam**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Department of Marine Geophysics
National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research (NCAOR)
India
lachit@ncaor.gov.in

**Nobuaki Osono**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Faculty of Science
Graduate School of Science and Technology for Innovation,
Yamaguchi University
Japan
t004dg@gmail.com

**David W. Peate**

**Petrologist**

Earth & Environmental Sciences
University of Iowa
USA
david-peate@uiowa.edu

**Patricia Persaud**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Department of Geology and Geophysics
Louisiana State University
USA
ppersaud@lsu.edu

**Ning Qiu**

**Petrophysics (Physical Properties) Specialist**

Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China
ningqiu@scsio.ac.cn

**Sara Satolli**

**Paleomagnetist**

Department of Engineering and Geology
University of Chieti-Pescara
Italy
sara.satolli@unich.it
**Julie C. Schindlbeck**

**Sedimentologist**

GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel

Germany

jschindlbeck@geomar.de

Present affiliation (20 September 2017):

Institute of Earth Sciences

Heidelberg University

Germany

**Susanne M. Straub**

**Sedimentologist/Petrologist**

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Columbia University

USA

smstraub@ldeo.columbia.edu

**Liyan Tian**

**Inorganic Geochemist**

Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering

Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

lytian@idsse.ac.cn

## Expedition 368 observers

**Pai-Sen Yu**

**Paleontologist (foraminifers)**

National Applied Research Laboratories (NARLabs)

Taiwan Ocean Research Institute (TORI)

Taiwan

epson_yu@narlabs.org.tw

## Expedition 368 education and outreach

**Amanda M. Wolfe**

**Education/Outreach Officer**

USA

wolfe.amanda.marie@gmail.com

## Operational and technical staff

### SIEM Offshore AS officials

**Expedition 367**

**Terry Skinner**

Master of the Drilling Vessel

**Expedition 368**

**Steve Bradley**

Master of the Drilling Vessel

### JRSO shipboard personnel and technical representatives

**Expedition 367**

**Robert Aduddell**

Engineer

**Froukje M. van der Zwan**

**Petrologist**

Institute of Geosciences

Christian Albrechts University Kiel

Germany

fvdz@gpi.uni-kiel.de

**Shiming Wan**

**Sedimentologist**

Institute of Oceanology

Chinese Academy of Sciences

China

wanshiming@ms.qdio.ac.cn

**Huaichun Wu**

**Paleomagnetist**

School of Ocean Sciences

China University of Geosciences

China

whcgeo@cugb.edu.cn

**Guangfa Zhong**

**Sedimentologist**

School of Ocean and Earth Science

Tongji University

China

gfz@tongji.edu.cn

**Gailun Zhang**

China

jyjj1234567@126.com

**Shuhao Xie**

**Education/Outreach Officer**

China

rafaelxie@qq.com

**Sam McLelland**

Offshore Installation Manager

**Wayne Malone**

Offshore Installation Manager

**Alexis Armstrong**

X-Ray Laboratory
**Heather Barnes**
Assistant Laboratory Officer

**Chad Broyles**
Curatorial Specialist

**Michael Cannon**
Marine Computer Specialist

**Etienne Claassen**
Marine Instrumentation Specialist

**Ty Cobb**
Physical Properties Laboratory

**William Crawford**
Senior Imaging Specialist

**Benjamin Daniel**
Core Laboratory

**Roy Davis**
Laboratory Officer

**David Fackler**
Applications Developer

**Seth Frank**
Thin Section Laboratory

**Edwin Garrett**
Paleomagnetism Laboratory

**Expedition 368**

**Susan Boehm**
Thin Section Laboratory

**Lisa Brandt**
Chemistry Laboratory

**Lisa Crowder**
Assistant Laboratory Officer

**Aaron de Loach**
Core Laboratory

**Keith Dupuis**
Underway Geophysics Laboratory

**Sheryl Frazier**
Physical Properties Laboratory

**Timothy Fulton**
Senior Imaging Specialist

**Clayton Furman**
Logging Engineer

**Randy Gjesvold**
Marine Instrumentation Specialist

**Kevin Grigar**
Operations Superintendent

**Sandra Herrmann**
Assistant Laboratory Officer

**Michael Hodge**
Marine Computer Specialist

**Rachael Gray**
Core Laboratory

**Jan Jurie Kotze**
Marine Instrumentation Specialist

**Zenon Mateo**
Underway Geophysics Laboratory/Downhole Tools Laboratory

**Stephen Midgley**
Operations Superintendent

**Erik Moortgat**
Chemistry Laboratory

**Chieh Peng**
Assistant Laboratory Officer

**Vincent Percuoco**
Chemistry Laboratory

**Alyssa Stephens**
Publications Specialist

**Kerry Swain**
Logging Engineer

**Steven Thomas**
Marine Computer Specialist

**Rui Wang**
Applications Developer

**Minh Nhut Huynh**
Marine Computer Specialist

**Nicolette Lawler**
X-Ray Laboratory

**Brittany Martinez**
Curatorial Specialist

**Aaron Mechler**
Chemistry Laboratory

**Mike Meiring**
Engineer

**William Mills**
Laboratory Officer

**Algie Morgan**
Applications Developer

**Beth Novak**
Paleomagnetism Laboratory

**Garrick Van Rensburg**
Marine Instrumentation Specialist

**Jean Wulfson**
Publications Specialist

**Hai (James) Zhao**
Applications Developer
IODP Publication Services staff*

**Douglas Cummings**
Graphics Specialist II

**Gudelia (“Gigi”) Delgado**
Publications Coordinator

**Ekanta Desai**
Graphics Specialist II

**Patrick H. Edwards**
Production Editor IV

**Jaime A. Gracia**
Supervisor of Production and Graphics

**Jenni Hesse**
Editor III

**Rhonda Kappler**
Graphics Specialist III

**Shana C. Lewis**
Editor III

**Ginny Lowe**
Reports Coordinator

**Amy McWilliams**
Supervisor of Editing

**Julie Myers**
Production Editor II

**Lorri Peters**
Manager of Publication Services

**Sandi Sherar Ruddick**
Editor II

**Kenneth Sherar**
Production Editor III

**Alyssa Stephens**
Graphics Specialist III

**Crystal Wolfe**
Production Editor III

**Jean Wulfson**
Graphics Specialist III

**Ann Yeager**
Distribution Specialist

<footnote>*At time of publication.</footnote>
# Expedition-related bibliography*

## IODP publications

### Scientific Prospectus

Sun, Z., Stock, J., Jian, Z., McIntosh, K., Alvarez-Zarikian, C.A., and Klaus, A., 2016. *Expedition 367/368 Scientific Prospectus: South China Sea Rifted Margin*. International Ocean Discovery Program.

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.sp.367368.2016

Sun, Z., Stock, J., Jian, Z., Larsen, H.-C., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and Klaus, A., 2016. *Expedition 367/368 Scientific Prospectus Addendum: South China Sea Rifted Margin*. International Ocean Discovery Program.

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.sp.367368add.2016

### Preliminary Report

Sun, Z., Stock, J., Klaus, A., and the Expedition 367 Scientists, 2018. *Expedition 367 Preliminary Report: South China Sea Rifted Margin*. International Ocean Discovery Program.

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.pr.367.2018

Jian, Z., Larsen, H.C., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 368 Scientists, 2018. *Expedition 368 Preliminary Report: South China Sea Rifted Margin*. International Ocean Discovery Program.

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.pr.368.2018

### Proceedings volume

Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, 2018. *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.2018

### Expedition reports

Larsen, H.C., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Expedition 367/368 summary. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program). https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.101.2018

Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Expedition 367/368 methods. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.102.2018

Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1499. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.103.2018

Stock, J.M., Sun, Z., Klaus, A., Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1500. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.104.2018

Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1501. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.105.2018

Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1502. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the

<footnote>*The Expedition-related bibliography is continually updated online (http://publications.iodp.org/proceedings/367_368/367368title.html#bib). Please send updates to PubCrd@iodp.tamu.edu.</footnote>
Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.106.2018

Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1503. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.107.2018

Larsen, H.C., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1505. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the
Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceed-
ings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Sta-
tion, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.108.2018

Jian, Z., Larsen, H.C., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Site U1505. In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.109.2018

Supplementary material

Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, 2018. Supplementary material, https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368supp.2018. Supplement to Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists, *South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program).

https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.2018
https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.101.2018

# Expedition 367/368 summary<fnref n="1" />

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

Hans Christian Larsen, Zhen Sun, Joann M. Stock, Zhimin Jian, Carlos A. Alvarez Zarikian, Adam Klaus, Jacopo Boaga, Stephen A. Bowden, Anne Briais, Yifeng Chen, Deniz Cukur, Kelsie A. Dadd, Weiwei Ding, Michael J. Dorais, Eric C. Ferré, Fabricio Ferreira, Akira Furusawa, Aaron J. Gewecke, Jessica L. Hinojosa, Tobias W. Höfig, Kan-Hsi Hsiung, Baoqi Huang, Enqing Huang, Xiao-Long Huang, Shijun Jiang, Haiyan Jin, Benjamin G. Johnson, Robert M. Kurzawski, Chao Lei, Baohua Li, Li Li, Yanping Li, Jian Lin, Chang Liu, Chuanlian Liu, Zhifei Liu, Antonio Luna, Claudia Lupi, Anders J. McCarthy, Geoffroy Mohn, Lachit Singh Ningthoujam, Michael Nirrengarten, Nobuaki Osono, David W. Peate, Patricia Persaud, Ning Qiu, Caroline M. Robinson, Sara Satolli, Isabel Sauermilch, Julie C. Schindlbeck, Steven M. Skinner, Susanne M. Straub, Xiang Su, Liyan Tian, Froukje M. van der Zwan, Shiming Wan, Huaichun Wu, Rong Xiang, Rajeev Yadav, Liang Yi, Cuimei Zhang, Jinchang Zhang, Yang Zhang, Ning Zhao, Guangfa Zhong, and Lifeng Zhong<fnref n="2" />

**Keywords:** International Ocean Discovery Program, IODP, JOIDES Resolution, Expedition 367, Expedition 368, Site U1499, Site U1500, Site U1501, Site U1502, Site U1503, Site U1504, Site U1505, northern South China Sea, rifted margin, continent-ocean transition zone, hyperextension, continental breakup, lithosphere thinning, igneous activity, outer margin high, embryonic ocean, steady-state ocean, basalt, altered basalt, greenschist, gravel, Cenozoic, subsidence, T60 unconformity, red clay, turbidite, marine microfossil

## Abstract

The primary objectives of International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 367/368 to the northern South China Sea (SCS) margin were to (1) examine its history of continental breakup and (2) compare it with other nonvolcanic or magma-poor rifted margins with the broader goal of testing models for continental breakup. A secondary objective was to further our understanding of the paleoceanographic and environmental development of the SCS and southeast Asia during the Cenozoic. Four primary sites were selected for the overall program: one in the outer margin high (OMH) and three seaward of the OMH on distinct, margin-parallel basement ridges. These three ridges are informally labeled A, B, and C and are located in the continent-ocean transition (COT) zone ranging from the OMH to the interpreted steady-state oceanic crust (Ridge C) of the SCS. The main scientific objectives include the following:

* Determining the nature of the basement in crustal units across the COT of the SCS that are critical to constrain style of rifting,

* Constraining the time interval from initial crustal extension and plate rupture to the initial generation of igneous ocean crust,

* Constraining vertical crustal movements during breakup, and

* Examining the nature of igneous activity from rifting to seafloor spreading.

In addition, the sediment cores from the drill sites targeting primarily tectonic and basement objectives will provide information on the Cenozoic regional environmental development of the Southeast Asia margin.

Site U1499 on Ridge A and Site U1500 on Ridge B were drilled during Expedition 367. Expedition 368 was planned to drill at two primary sites (U1501 and U1503) at the OMH and Ridge C, respectively, but based on drilling results from Expedition 367, Expedition 368 chose to insert an alternate site on Ridge A (Site U1502). In ad-

## Contents

1 Abstract

2 Introduction

3 Background

6 Expedition objectives

7 Coring and logging strategy

10 Site summaries

34 Preliminary scientific assessment

37 References

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1">¹ Larsen, H.C., Sun, Z., Stock, J.M., Jian, Z., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., Klaus, A., Boaga, J., Bowden, S.A., Briais, A., Chen, Y., Cukur, D., Dadd, K.A., Ding, W., Dorais, M.J., Ferré, E.C., Ferreira, F., Furusawa, A., Gewecke, A.J., Hinojosa, J.L., Höfig, T.W., Hsiung, K.-H., Huang, B., Huang, E., Huang, X.-L., Jiang, S., Jin, H., Johnson, B.G., Kurzawski, R.M., Lei, C., Li, B., Li, L., Li, Y., Lin, J., Liu, C., Liu, C., Liu, Z., Luna, A., Lupi, C., McCarthy, A.J., Mohn, G., Ningthoujam, L.S., Nirrengarten, M., Osono, N., Peate, D.W., Persaud, P., Qui, N., Robinson, C.M., Satolli, S., Sauermilch, I., Schindlbeck, J.C., Skinner, S.M., Straub, S.M., Su, X., Tian, L., van der Zwan, F.M., Wan, S., Wu, H., Xiang, R., Yadav, R., Yi, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, N., Zhong, G., and Zhong, L., 2018. Expedition 367/368 summary. *In Sun, Z., Jian, Z., Stock, J.M., Larsen, H.C., Klaus, A., Alvarez Zarikian, C.A., and the Expedition 367/368 Scientists. South China Sea Rifted Margin*. Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, 367/368: College Station, TX (International Ocean Discovery Program). https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.367368.101.2018</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² **Expedition 367/368 Scientists' addresses.**</footnote>

<footnote>MS 367368-101: Published 28 September 2018</footnote>

<footnote>This work is distributed under the **Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International** (CC BY 4.0) license.</footnote>
dition, Expedition 368 added two more sites on the OMH (Sites U1504 and U1505). Expedition 367/368 completed operations at six of the seven sites (U1499–U1502, U1504, and U1505). Site U1503, however, was not completed beyond casing without coring to 990 m because of mechanical problems with the drilling equipment that prevented the expedition, after 25 May 2017, from operating with a drill string longer than 3400 m. New alternate Site U1504, proposed during Expedition 367, met this condition. Original Site U1505 also met the operational constraints of the 3400 m drill string (total) and was an alternate site for the already-drilled Site U1501.

At Site U1499, we cored to 1081.8 m in 22.1 days with 52% recovery and then logged downhole data from 655 to 1020 m. In 31 days at Site U1500, we penetrated to 1529 m, cored a total of 1012.8 m with 37% recovery, and collected log data from 842 to 1133 m. At Site U1501, we cored to 697.1 m in 9.4 days with 78.5% recovery. We also drilled ahead for 433.5 m in Hole U1501D and then logged downhole data from 78.3 to 399.3 m. In 19.3 days at Site U1502, we penetrated 1679.0 m in Holes U1502A (758 m) and U1502B (921 m), set 723.7 m of casing and cored a total of 576.3 m with 53.5% recovery, and collected downhole log data from 785.3 to 875.3 m and seismic data through the 10¾ inch casing. At Site U1503, we penetrated 995.1 m and set 991.5 m of 10¾ inch casing, but no cores were taken because of a mechanical problem with the drawworks. At Site U1504, we took 40 rotary core barrel (RCB) cores over two holes. The cored interval between both holes was 277.3 m with 26.8% recovery. An 88.2 m interval was drilled in Hole U1504B. At Site U1505, we cored 668.0 m with 101.1% recovery. Logging data was collected from 80.1 to 341.2 m. Operations at this site covered 6.1 days. Except for Sites U1503 and U1505, all sites were drilled to acoustic basement. A total of 6.65 days were lost due to mechanical breakdown or waiting on spare supplies for repair of drilling equipment, but drilling options were severely limited from 25 May to the end of the expedition by the defective drawworks limiting deployment of drill string longer than 3400 m.

At Site U1499, coring ~200 m into the interpreted acoustic basement sampled sedimentary rocks, possibly including early Miocene chalks underlain by Oligocene polymict breccias and poorly cemented gravels of unknown age comprising sandstone pebbles and cobbles. Preliminary structural and lithologic analysis suggests that the gravels might be early to late synrift sediment. At Site U1500, the main seismic reflector corresponds to the top of a basalt sequence at ~1379.1 m. We cored 149.90 m into this volcanic package and recovered 114.92 m (77%) of sparsely to moderately plagioclase-phyric basalt comprising numerous lava flows, including pillow lavas with glass, chilled margins, altered veins, hyaloclastites, and minor sediment. Preliminary geochemical analyses indicate that the basalt is tholeiitic.

Sampling of the Pleistocene to lower Miocene sedimentary section at Sites U1499 and U1500 was not continuous for two reasons. First, there was extremely poor recovery in substantial intervals interpreted to be poorly lithified sands, possibly turbidites. Second, we chose to drill down without coring in some sections at Site U1500 to ensure sufficient time to achieve this site's high-priority deep drilling objectives. The upper Miocene basin sequence, which consists of interbedded claystone, siltstone, and sandstone can be correlated between the two sites by seismic stratigraphic mapping and biostratigraphy.

At Site U1501 on the OMH, coring ~45 m into the acoustic basement sampled prerift(?) deposits comprising sandstone to conglomerate of presumed Mesozoic age. These deposits are overlain by siliciclastic synrift sediments of Eocene to Oligocene age followed by primarily carbonaceous postrift sediments of early Miocene to Pleistocene age.

Site U1502 on Ridge A was cased to 723.7 m. No coring was attempted shallower than 380 m to save operational time and because of low expectations for core recovery in the upper Plio-Pleistocene sequence. At this site, we recovered 180 m of hydrothermally altered brecciated basalts comprising sheet and pillow lavas below deep-marine sediments of Oligocene to late Miocene age. At Site U1503 on Ridge C, 991.5 m of casing was installed in preparation for the planned deep drilling to ~1800 m. No coring was performed due to mechanical failures, and the site was abandoned without further activity except for installation of a reentry cone. Coring at Site U1504 on the OMH, located ~45 km east of Site U1501, recovered mostly foliated, greenschist facies metamorphic rocks below late Eocene(?) carbonate rocks (partly reef debris) and early Miocene to Pleistocene sediments. At Site U1505, we cored to 480.15 m through Pleistocene to late Oligocene mainly carbonaceous ooze followed at depth by early Oligocene siliciclastic sediments.

Efforts were made at every drill site to correlate the core with the seismic data and seismic stratigraphic unconformities interpreted in the Eocene to Plio-Pleistocene sedimentary sequence prior to drilling. The predrilling interpretation of ages of these unconformities was in general confirmed by drilling results, although some nontrivial corrections can be expected from detailed post-expedition work on integrating seismic stratigraphic interpretations with detailed bio- and lithostratigraphy.

As a result of the limited length of drill string that could be deployed during the later part of Expedition 368, the secondary expedition objectives addressing the environmental history of the SCS and Southeast Asia received more focus than originally planned, allowing Site U1505 (alternate to Site U1501) to be included. Despite this change in focus, Expedition 367/368 provided solid evidence for a process of breakup that included vigorous synrift magmatism as opposed to the often-favored interpretation of the SCS margin as a magma-starved margin or a margin possibly overprinted at a much later stage by plume-related magmatism. In this broader perspective, Expedition 367/368 accomplished a fundamental objective of the two-expedition science program.

## Introduction

The South China Sea (SCS) margin (Figure F1) is an accessible and seismically well-imaged location where drilling of synrift sediment and underlying basement will provide key constraints on the processes of rifting and eventual rupturing of the continental lithosphere during breakup at a highly extended rifted margin. Expedition 367/368 was based on International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) drilling Proposals 878-CPP, 878-Add, 878-Add2, and 878-Add3. This project was implemented as a single science program with 114 days of drilling operations spread across two IODP expeditions as outlined in the Expedition 367/368 *Scientific Prospectus* (Sun et al., 2016b). Two expeditions were required to drill four high-priority, deep-penetration sites in a transect across the margin. Of these, three sites targeted acoustic basement in the continent-ocean transition (COT), and one site targeted prerift through synrift to postrift sequences on the landward side of the transect. Although the primary focus of this drilling expedition was to discriminate among possible models for rifting and plate rupture, the drilling, along with results from Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 184 and IODP Expedition 349, addressed a secondary objective to improve our understanding of the Cenozoic environmental evolution of the southeast Asian area as recorded in the sediments of the SCS basin.
Figure F1. Seismic data coverage and magnetic anomalies in the SCS basin, Expedition 367/368. Black lines = ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) refraction data. Other seismic lines are mostly multichannel seismic reflection data. Yellow lines = magnetic isochrons (labeled with white text) from Briais et al. (1993). White stars = Expedition 367/368 drill sites. ODP Leg 184 (red squares) and IODP Expedition 349 (red circles) sites are shown with site numbers. For more details, see Figure F4.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Background**

**Global questions regarding formation of rifted margins**

ODP (1985–2003) made a major effort along the rifted margins of the North Atlantic to understand the processes of continental breakup (ODP Legs 103, 104, 149, 152, 163, 173, and 210). This effort resulted in the recognition of two end-members of rifted margins (see summary of observations in Sun et al., 2016a, 2016b).

The first recognized end-member is referred to as a volcanic rifted margin, examples of which are characterized by massive igneous activity in a relatively short period of time (~1–3 million years) during breakup and initial seafloor spreading. The pair of conjugate margins of Greenland and northwest Europe is a type example. In these locations, the asthenospheric mantle may have been anomalously hot (e.g., mantle plumes), leading to thermal weakening of the continental lithosphere followed by rapid plate rupture (Duncan, Larsen, Allan, et al., 1996; Eldholm et al., 2000; Geoffroy, 2005).

The second recognized end-member is the hyperextended, magma-poor rifted margin, which is interpreted to endure hyperextension of the continental crust, with tectonic extension at the distal margin leading eventually to serpentinization and exhumation of the subcontinental mantle. The Newfoundland and Iberia conjugate

margin, where serpentinized exhumed mantle occupies a broad zone in the COT, is an example of this type of margin (Boillot, Winterer, et al., 1988; Whitmarsh, Sawyer, Klaus, and Masson, 1996; Beslier, Whitmarsh, Wallace, and Girardeau, 2001). However, it is the only conjugate margin pair where geophysical interpretation has been confirmed by scientific drilling. The introduction of water to the subcontinental lithospheric mantle is interpreted to have taken place through deep, crust-cutting faults, causing serpentinization that profoundly weakens the mantle lithosphere and facilitates plate rupture. The subsequent ultraslow spreading led to formation of additional serpentinite on the seafloor (e.g., Dick et al., 2003) until sufficient magma production for normal oceanic crust to form was established.

Other examples of hyperextended rifted margins have been interpreted from seismic reflection data (e.g., Brune et al., 2017; Doré and Lundin, 2015). However, it is not known if serpentinized mantle plays a critical role in all cases. Modeling by Huismans and Beaumont (2008, 2011) suggests several scenarios for the formation of rifted margins in the absence of anomalously hot asthenospheric mantle. One scenario (Type I of Huismans and Beaumont, 2011) is the Iberia-Newfoundland-type margin described above. In this case, lithospheric thinning initially occurs in the (upper) crust, with extensional faults profoundly thinning the continental crust (hyperextension) and eventually reaching the mantle and causing serpentinization (Whitmarsh et al., 2001; Pérez-Gussinyé and Reston, 2001; Pérez-Gussinyé et al., 2006; Reston, 2009; Sutra and Manatschal, 2012). The schematic model of this type of margin development, shown in Figure F2, guided the drilling strategy of Expedition 367/368. Huismans and Beaumont (2008, 2011), however, also suggest that final plate rupture can occur without exhumation of the subcontinental mantle and can be followed rather quickly by igneous oceanic crust formation, a scenario that our chosen drilling strategy also tested. The highly extended northern margin of the SCS is therefore an excellent location to examine through drilling whether this margin experienced magmatism during breakup or its development is closer to the Iberia-type, amagmatic margin.

**Geological setting**

The SCS is a modestly sized young ocean basin that formed along the eastern boundary of the Eurasian plate during mid- to late Cenozoic time (Figure F1). Expedition 367/368 cored and logged a transect of drill sites across the COT in the northern SCS (Figure F3).

Before the continental crust rifted to form the present SCS, there used to be a subduction zone in the late Mesozoic along the southeast part of the South China block (Zhou and Li, 2000; Zhou et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012a, 2012b). This relatively young continental lithosphere subsequently underwent extensive rifting during the Paleogene, likely in the Eocene and early Oligocene. Seafloor spreading in the SCS started during the Oligocene, with the oldest interpreted magnetic anomaly in the area of the drilling transect interpreted to be Anomaly C11 (~29.5 Ma) or possibly C12n (~31 Ma) (Briais et al., 1993; Li et al., 2013, 2014; Franke et al., 2013). Seafloor spreading then started to propagate into the Southwest Subbasin at ~23 Ma (Briais et al., 1993; Barckhausen and Roeser, 2004; Li et al., 2012a, 2012b; Franke et al., 2013).

The initial half-spreading rate may have been as high as ~3.6 cm/y, later slowing to 1.2 cm/y with seafloor spreading to eventually cease by ~15 Ma (Li et al., 2014). The initial spreading rate in the SCS basin is therefore higher than the ultraslow spreading scenario of the Iberia-Newfoundland margin (Dick et al., 2003).
Figure F2. A–D. Schematic development of continental breakup initiated by a simple shear along a deep, low-angle fault. B–D are slightly modified from Huismans and Beaumont (2011) and illustrate modeling-based stages of extension at magma-poor, Iberia-Newfoundland type rifted margins. Key features of D are thinning of the upper crust, juxtaposition of lower crust with serpentinized mantle between the outer margin and igneous oceanic crust. UP = upper plate, LP = lower plate. The Expedition 367/368 drilling strategy was designed to sample and test whether or not these fundamental crustal units and tectonic relationships are present at the northern SCS rifted margin.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

Subduction of the eastern part of the SCS basin started at or before ~15 Ma along the Manila Trench (Li et al., 2013). For a more complete review of the regional setting and tectonic development of the SCS, see Shi and Li (2012), Franke et al. (2013), Li et al. (2013), and Sun et al. (2014).

The Expedition 367/368 drilling transect is located ~50 km west of IODP Site U1435 along the northern SCS margin (Figures F1, F3) (Li et al., 2015a, 2015b). A transform fault defines a western boundary of a margin segment that exhibits a broad zone of crustal extension (Figure F4). This broad zone of extension (COT) may end to the east somewhere between Sites U1432 and U1435. East of this position, continental crust seems to thin into ocean crust in a much narrower COT. It is therefore conceivable that a kind of crustal transform zone is present in this location and defines an eastern end of a margin segment characterized by a high degree of crustal extension.

The segment of the SCS margin addressed by Expedition 367/368 is characterized by a relatively broader COT (~80 km) of crustal stretching and extension (Figure F5) prior to breakup and stretches for nearly 100 km between longitudes 115°35′E and 116°30′E. A deep sag basin (midslope basin [MSB]) of presumed Eocene to Oligocene age is present in the midslope area and is bounded seaward by an outer margin high (OMH), forming a quite persistent structure along the margin. Three distinct ridges (A, B, and C in Figure F4) are found seaward of the OMH in the more distal margin and on progressively thinner crust in the COT. We refer

Figure F3. Bathymetric maps showing Expedition 367/368 sites (stars), and (A) regional and (B) local coverage of multichannel seismic reflection data and OBS data. Thick blue and red lines are key seismic lines used for planning of the drilling transect. A. Magnetic isochrons (orange lines) from Briais et al. (1993). B. Magnetic picks (orange squares) from the same reference, extracted from the Seton et al. (2014) compilation. Chron labels for the picks correspond to the old edge of the normal polarity intervals (see Ogg et al. [2016] timescale for ages). Orange square = Leg 184 Site 1148, yellow squares = Expedition 349 Sites U1432 and U1435.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

to the continent/ocean boundary (COB) as the much narrower zone in which the outermost, highly thinned continental lithosphere is replaced seaward by new crust that formed in a narrow zone at a spreading ridge in a steady-state fashion. The latter can include continuous tectonic exhumation of rising lithospheric or asthenospheric mantle (e.g., Dick et al., 2003), accretion of normal igneous oceanic crust, or a mixture of these two processes. Constraining the nature and location of the COB at the SCS will require integrated interpretation of deep crustal reflection normal and wide-angle incidence seismic data and deep sampling by drilling.
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>Figure F4. Two-way traveltime to (A) acoustic basement (Tg reflector) and (B) Unconformity T60 and location of Expedition 367/368 sites. Proposed drilling transect (thick black line) was located approximately at the center of a margin segment bounded to the southwest by a transform fault. Northeastern boundary of margin segment is located around Expedition 349 Site U1435. In this location, the outer margin high and Ridge A seem to coalesce, and Ridges B and C of the COT become indistinct toward the northeast within the next margin segment. Note that outer margin high is slightly east-northeast to the more parallel Ridges A, B, and C.</figcaption></figure>

The clear seismic reflections from the Mohorovičić seismic discontinuity (Moho) show distinct thinning of the continental crust (Figure F5) across the COT with a thickness of ~6 km around the seaward end. Separate layers hypothesized to be upper, middle, and lower crust are present in the landward part of these seismic pro-

files. The lower crust is acoustically transparent and may in places be as thin as ~6 km. Lower crust with a similar thickness and seismic appearance is reported from the northeastern SCS margin (McIntosh et al., 2013, 2014; Lester et al., 2013). The seaward continuation of this crustal layering into the COB is, however, ambiguous, and prevents us from interpreting the detailed nature of the COB at this point.

The upper crust shows numerous extensional, low-angle detachment faults soling out at midcrustal levels. This fault system generated a number of deep half-grabens filled with synrift sediments that were subsequently covered by postrift sediments. The boundary between synrift and postrift sediments may follow the seismic stratigraphic unconformity named T70 (Figure F5). Industry data from distant wells suggest a breakup unconformity age of ~34 Ma. However, this age of T70 may be subject to revision, and in addition, the time of crustal extension is not necessarily synchronous across the margin and could be younger toward the outer margin. A younger, widely distributed unconformity (T60) is also shown in Figure F5. The T60 unconformity corresponds to a hiatus at ~23 Ma found at ODP Site U1148 (Shipboard Scientific Party, 2000) and IODP Site U1435. T60 is approximately synchronous with a southward jump of the SCS spreading axis (Briais et al., 1993). However, the age of T60 may also be subject to revision, and the relationship between a ridge jump and a margin-wide unconformity and seismic sequence boundary remains speculative at this point.

The OMH hosts a number of relatively shallow half-graben basins on top of this broad basement high. The stratigraphy of these smaller basins can be traced seismically into the deeper, central basin sag below the MSB (Figure F5). The normal faults bounding these OMH basins are clearly imaged and, for the main part, dip seaward. These small rift basins, therefore, offer an opportunity to sample the stratigraphy covering the entire period of rifting and postrift subsidence. The MSB itself is bounded landward by major, seaward-dipping normal fault(s) seemingly forming major detachments soling out at middle to lower crustal levels but not penetrating through the lower crust. This suggests decoupling between the upper and lower crust and, at least in this more landward part of the margin, faults never penetrated the lower crust, which may have remained ductile and resistant to faulting.

The lower crust in the COT may thicken seaward (lower crustal flow?), but this interpretation is not well constrained (Figure F5). Likewise, seismic imaging of the low-angle faults and detachments in the landward part of the COT cannot, with confidence, be traced into the distal margin regime south of the OMH. One possibility is that the main detachment zone was located above what later became Ridge A, effectively implying that Ridge A is a core complex consisting of lower continental crust or subcontinental mantle, depending on how deeply detachments exhumed the lithosphere in the distal margin. Alternatively, if the main detachment underlies Ridge A, this structure would represent upper plate material of upper crustal origin.

Ridge A is for the most part dome-like, showing neither normal faults nor clearly developed synrift half-grabens like the OMH. Excluding postrift sediments, the crust below this outermost basement high is only ~6–8 km thick using the ocean-bottom seismometer velocity constraints of Yan et al. (2001), Wang et al. (2006), and Wei et al. (2011). Seaward of Ridge A and across ridges B and C, the crust has a fairly uniform thickness of ~6 km, which could be consistent with oceanic crust (Yan et al., 2001). The oldest linear magnetic anomaly that can be confidently mapped along this margin segment is interpreted as magnetic Chron C11n based on
Figure F5. Deep crustal time-migrated seismic reflection data without and with interpretation. Note the rather thin lower crust (two layers) above a strong Mohorovičić seismic discontinuity (Moho) reflector that can be followed oceanward. Moho reflection is weak to absent seaward from around the interpreted COT. Wide-angle seismic data (Yan et al., 2001) confirm ~6 km thick ocean crust (OC) seaward of the COT. A large detachment fault ~150 km inland of the COT separates more stable crust landward from that of highly extended crust seaward. An OMH is a fairly consistent feature along this margin segment. Key seismic unconformities are shown in purple (T70; ~32 Ma breakup unconformity?) and blue (T60; ~23 Ma regional basin event). These ages are inferred from long-distance (>100 km) correlation of seismic unconformities with industry holes and ODP Leg 184 Site 1148 (T60); ages need confirmation by coring and are only tentative. Tg (black) is basement. Arrows = approximate position of seafloor magnetic anomalies with chron numbers. Seismic data are from Line 04ec1555-08ec1555 (courtesy of Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation [CNOOC]). Location of line is shown in Figure F3. CDP = common depth point. C11n, C10n, and C9n = approximate location of normal polarity magnetic isochrons. MSB = midslope basin.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

total magnetic field data; the corresponding magnetic high is located ~10 km seaward (south) of Ridge B (Figure F5). However, if this position is corrected by deskewing the magnetic data, the magnetic high corresponding to C11n with an age of ~29.5–30 Ma will be located more or less on top of Ridge B (Figure F5).

Both Ridges B and C consist of fault blocks tilted landward along seaward-dipping normal faults (Figure F5). Ridge B shows seismic features along strike and in the uppermost crust that could be consistent with a volcanic origin. However, without drilling constraints, these features could also be interpreted as prerift deposits below the seismic unconformity that defines the top of acoustic basement at Ridge B. Ridge C is seismically similar in many ways to Ridge B. However, an apparent reversed magnetic anomaly (C10r; ~29 Ma) strongly suggests that this ridge indeed represents close to if not full igneous oceanic crust.

Sampling the basement at Ridges A, B, and C was therefore essential for Expedition 367/368 to distinguish between different tectonic models for breakup along highly extended margins. Ridges A and B in particular help constrain the style of rifting and to determine if the SCS margin indeed succeeded to the stage of a hyperEXTENDED margin or not. Ridge C is assumed to represent the early igneous crust, and samples from this ridge will constrain the nature of early oceanic crust formation, specifically how quickly a robust igneous system was established, what mantle source was involved (e.g., composition, temperature), what conditions of mantle melting (degree and depth of melting) ruled, and, if any, type and amount of continental crustal contamination of the igneous material derived from the asthenospheric mantle.

## Expedition objectives

The two-expedition drilling transect across the SCS margin set out to understand the timing and process of rifting, the eventual rupturing of the continental crust, and the onset of breakup-related magmatism at the SCS rifted margin (Figure F2). Four primary and sixteen alternate drill sites across a ~150 km wide COT zone were defined in the *Scientific Prospectus* (Sun et al., 2016b). The four primary sites targeted the four main tectonic features (the OMH and its small rift basins) and the nature of the three ridges in the distal margin (Ridges A, B, and C). At each of these sites, the nature of the acoustic basement and the record of synrift and postrift deposits were key targets.

Results from the OMH site (U1501) in particular will address the rifting history and provide constraints on the degree of crustal exhumation, if any, in the OMH. Located off the distal margin and in relatively thick crust, the subsidence history at this site can be compared with that of the more distal margin, which suffered a much higher degree of crustal thinning. Sampling of prerift through synrift to postrift sediments in one of the rotated fault blocks at the OMH can constrain the timing of rifting and rate of extension in a location where results can be tied to the much deeper rift basins further landward through a dense grid of high-quality 2-D seismic data provided by the Chinese National Offshore Oil and Gas Company (CNOOC). The site has the further advantage of a water depth shallower than the other three primary sites and, importantly, above the present carbonate compensation depth (CCD). It therefore has
the potential to yield a rich record of carbonate sediments for detailed paleoclimate studies using stable isotope techniques.

Ridge A in particular will be important for constraining whether this ridge is a core complex representing lower plate material (mantle of lower crust), upper plate extensional fault block, or igneous material related to breakup. Ridge B provides an option to distinguish between possible unroofed, lower plate material, upper plate extensional fault block, and igneous material related to incipient seafloor spreading. Ridge C, as described above, targeted sampling a time series of early ocean floor volcanism to establish a reference frame for understanding and modeling the igneous development of the margin.

Except for coring at Ridge C, where operations came to a halt for technical reasons, Expedition 367/368 completed all the above objectives. Expedition 367 drilled two of the primary sites (U1499 and U1500) on Ridges A and B (Figures F2, F3, F4, F5). Coring at Site U1499 on Ridge A recovered synrift or prerift sediments below the acoustic basement. Coring at Site U1500 successfully sampled 150 m of submarine basaltic lavas, including pillow lavas, below the acoustic basement at Ridge B. Expedition 368, which originally set out to drill the remaining two primary sites on Ridge C (U1503) and the OMH (Site U1501), added a second, alternate site on Ridge A (Site U1502) to improve the characterization of this ridge and recovered a 180 m thick sequence of submarine basaltic lavas. A successful drilling strategy (see **Coring and logging strategy**), however, allowed us to also pursue Site U1503 on Ridge C, but after installation of casing at this site, the hole had to be abandoned for technical reasons. This decision left time for inserting alternate Sites U1504 and U1505, both at shallower water depths on the OMH. Two of the OMH drill sites penetrated to acoustic basement and found Mesozoic prerift sediments (Site U1501) and metamorphic schist (Site U1504). Site U1505 provided ~100 percent recovery of a very complete Oligocene to Plio-Pleistocene sediment sequence.

## Coring and logging strategy

Drilling operations were designed to core and log through thick sediment sections and, significantly, into underlying basement using casing in the upper and unstable part of the sedimentary sections. Initially, the operational approach was to drill two holes per site (Figures F6, F7).

The first hole at each site would be cored with the advanced piston corer (APC) and extended core barrel (XCB) systems to refusal (or maximum casing depth) and then logged with the triple combination (triple combo) and Formation MicroScanner (FMS)-sonic tool strings. The APC/XCB hole would also document borehole and formation conditions to help determine the length of casing for drilling a second hole (B). All full APC cores were intended to be oriented, and formation temperature measurements would be made using the advanced piston corer temperature tool (APCT-3).

The second hole at each site was designed to begin by drilling in a seafloor reentry system with casing extending to ~650 m or an otherwise defined depth (Figures F8, F9, F10, F11). Casing is drilled down through the reentry cone using an extendable underreamer and mud motor technology (see https://rosetta.iodp.tamu.edu/A/TechDoc/8250). Following the installation of casing to the desired depth, coring using the RCB system could then extend from the base of the casing through the sediment and into the underlying basement. Multiple pipe trips to replace hard rock RCB bits would be made as required by the depth of the target in basement. Upon completion of the coring objectives, the RCB bit would be dropped either at the bottom of the hole or on the seafloor before downhole wireline logging was conducted. For this deeper logging, we planned to use the triple combo and FMS-sonic tool strings along with the Versatile Seismic Imager (VSI) tool string to conduct check shots.

During Expedition 367/368, we had to modify this general operational plan in response to borehole conditions and the need to fo-

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>Figure F6. Implemented Expedition 368 operations. TD = total depth.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>Figure F8. Reentry system and casing, Hole U1499B.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>Figure F9. Reentry system and casing, Hole U1500B.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>Figure F10. Reentry system and casing, Hole U1502B.</figcaption></figure>

During our operations time to achieve our highest priority basement objectives. The implemented operations are shown in Figures F6 and F7.

At Site U1499, the pilot (first) hole (U1499A) consisted of APC/XCB coring until refusal. In the pilot hole (U1500A) at Site U1500, we washed down without coring in the limits of safety approval and the requirements to identify appropriate locations for setting casing in the subsequent hole. We also decided not to collect downhole log data in either of these pilot holes, partly due to poor borehole conditions that we thought would not yield good data and partly to focus more time on the deeper core and log objectives.

For the primary, deep-penetrating, cased holes at each of the first two sites, we set as much casing as possible (651 m in Hole U1499B and 842 m in Hole U1500B) to keep the upper part of the hole in stable condition for drilling and to enhance our ability to clean cuttings out of such deep holes. Casing was drilled into the seafloor to total depth as a single step at each location to minimize hole disturbance and save time. We then drilled and cored using the RCB system below the casing until we reached the basement (Hole U1500B) or until hole conditions prevented further coring (Hole U1499B). We collected downhole logging data in the deep penetration hole at each site.

At Site U1501, the pilot hole (U1501C) consisted of APC/XCB coring until refusal. From the findings, we concluded that in this location the formation might be stable enough to continue with the deeper RCB Hole U1501D to ~600 m without casing. Logging was therefore not done in Hole U1501C. Hole U1501D was drilled without coring to a slightly shallower depth than Hole U1501C and then RCB cored to the bottom of the hole. Logging was then executed. This approach saved considerable operational time. We drilled in Hole U1502A to 375 m without coring and then cored with the RCB system to identify a proper casing point. Casing was then drilled in

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>Figure F11. Reentry system and casing, Hole U1503A.</figcaption></figure>

Hole U1502B to the desired depth, followed by RCB coring to target. Single-run logging (triple combo) was then executed in the open hole below casing with VSI check shots in both open hole and casing. At Site U1503, we initially drilled in Hole U1503A without coring to a planned casing depth (990 m) estimated on the basis of drilling data from Site U1500 (~20 km away) and seismic correlation between the two sites. A free-fall reentry system was deployed, and casing was subsequently installed in the already established Hole U1503A with the assistance of the underreamer and mud motor (Figure F12). This approach turned out to be very efficient and saved much time. Unfortunately, mechanical problems at the rig floor (lower clutch of the drawworks) prevented us from further pursuing the site.

With an operational limit of deploying a maximum of 3400 m of drill string for the remainder of Expedition 368, no deep sites requiring casing could be pursued. Site U1504 had a primary basement target below only ~120 m of sediment cover. Hole U1504A was RCB cored to ~150 m. Hole U1504B was drilled without coring to ~90 m and continued with RCB coring to 200 m. No logging was pursued.

Four holes were cored and/or drilled at Site U1505. Hole U1505C was cored with the APC as deep as possible, further cored with the half-length advanced piston corer (HLAPC) system until refusal, extended by XCB coring until the maximum length of the drill string was reached at 480 m, and then logged. Hole U1505D was cored with the APC to 180 m.
Figure F12. (A) Reentry system on the seafloor after free fall and (B) inspection of reentry cone after casing installation, Hole U1503A. The hole remains as a legacy hole for future occupation.

A

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>

B

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

## Site summaries

### Site U1499

Site U1499 is located on basement Ridge A in the SCS COT zone ~60 km seaward and southeast of the OMH. The goal of drilling here was to core through the sediment to sample the basement rocks and thus determine basement age and lithology, which would provide a test of different possible models for the processes and rheology controlling the extension and ultimate breakup of the continent. Ridge A was expected to have basement of either upper continental crust, lower continental crust, or exhumed mantle rocks. Coring and drilling also constrain the postrift history by determining the age, water depth, and subsidence rates of the overlying sedimentary packages.

We conducted operations in two holes at Site U1499 (proposed Site SCSI-14A; Sun et al., 2016b) (Table T1). Hole U1499A is located at 18°24.5698'N, 115°51.5881'E in a water depth of 3760.2 m. In Hole U1499A, APC/XCB coring penetrated from the seafloor to 659.2 m and recovered 417.05 m (63%). Hole U1499B is located at 18°24.5705'N, 115°51.5990'E in a water depth of 3758.1 m. We installed casing in Hole U1499B to 651 m followed by RCB coring that penetrated from 655.0 to 1081.8 m and recovered 150.64 m (35%). Coring terminated in gravel before deteriorating drilling conditions prevented further penetration; no crystalline basement was encountered. Despite challenging conditions in the lowermost part of Hole U1499B, two successful wireline logging runs were conducted from 652 to 1020 m.

## Lithostratigraphy

The cored sediment at Site U1499 is divided into nine lithostratigraphic units (Figure F13). Lithostratigraphic Unit I is a 48.85 m thick middle-upper Pleistocene sequence of dark greenish gray bioclast-rich clay with thin clayey silt and sand interbeds. Fining-upward silt and fine sand intervals are abundant and interpreted as turbidite sequences. Four thin (2–7 cm) ash layers were identified in Unit I; none were observed in the deeper units. Unit II (48.85–100.04 m) is a 51.19 m thick middle-upper Pleistocene sequence of interbedded greenish gray clay-rich calcareous ooze and dark greenish gray nannofossil-rich clay. Synsedimentary deformational structures such as folds, microfaults, and inclined beds are well developed in the sediment of this unit, which is interpreted as a slump deposit. This unit is underlain by Unit III (Pliocene–middle Pleistocene), which is divided into Subunits IIIA (100.04–181.80 m) and IIIB (181.80–333.65 m). The 233.61 m of Unit III is dominated by dark greenish gray clay with thick to very thick clayey silt and calcareous sand interlaminations. Subunit IIIA contains clayey silt layers that are thick laminations (<1 cm), whereas Subunit IIIB has abundant thin beds (2–5 cm) of clayey silt and an overall increase in nannofossil and foraminifer content. Unit IV (333.65–404.90 m) is a 71.25 m thick sequence of upper Miocene–Pliocene dark greenish gray silty sand with clay interbeds. Recovery is very low throughout this unit, but the recovered intervals and physical property data suggest that the sections with no recovery may contain unconsolidated to weakly consolidated sand.

Unit V (404.90–469.45 m) is a 64.55 m thick sequence of upper Miocene dark greenish gray clay with mostly thin (<5 cm) clayey silt and foraminifer sand interbeds. Drilling disturbance in the form of biscuiting increases significantly in this unit. Similar to Unit IV, recovery in Unit VI (469.45–618.30 m) is very low. The recovered intervals in this unit include upper Miocene dark greenish gray silty sand with clay interbeds. Unit VII (618.30–761.70 m) is mainly composed of upper Miocene dark greenish gray to dark gray sandstone and claystone with siltstone interbeds. Lithification increases sharply downhole from the top of this unit, although sections with no recovery are inferred to be nonlithified sand. Unit VIII (761.70–929.02 m) comprises a 167.32 m thick interval of upper Oligocene–Miocene reddish brown to reddish gray claystone and clay-rich chalk. Based on the abundance of calcareous material, this unit is divided into two subunits. Subunit VIIIIA (761.70–892.10 m) contains lower–upper Miocene dark reddish brown claystone with siltstone and foraminifer sandstone interbeds, whereas Subunit VIIIIB (892.10–929.02 m) is composed of upper Oligocene–lower Miocene reddish brown to reddish gray clay-rich nannofossil chalk and clay-rich chalk. In the lowest part of Subunit VIIIIB, abundant brownish black iron-manganese nodules occur in reddish brown nannofossil-rich claystone.

Unit IX (929.02–1081.80 m) is readily distinguished from the overlying units by containing Oligocene (and pre-Oligocene?) sandstone, claystone, matrix-supported breccia, and gravel. This unit is 152.78 m thick and comprises three subunits. Subunit IXA (929.02–933.28 m) is defined by dark brown and greenish gray sandstone and breccia. Subunit IXB (933.28–933.35 m) is defined by dark gray matrix-supported breccia in Core 367-U1499B-30R. Subunit IXC (933.35–1081.80 m) contains gray to dark gray gravel with silty sand intervals. The cores in Subunit IXC are completely fragmented and were recovered as pebbles and cobbles. In general,
<table><caption>Table T1. Expedition 367 hole summary. — = no data. Download table in CSV format.</caption><thead><tr><th>Hole</th><th>Proposed site</th><th>Location</th><th>Water depth (m)</th><th>Total penetration (m)</th><th>Cored interval (m)</th><th>Drilled interval without coring (m)</th><th>Core recovery (m)</th><th>Core recovery (%)</th><th>Time on hole (days)</th><th>Cores (N)</th><th>Depth of 10.75 inch casing (m)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1499A</td><td>SCSII-14A</td><td>18° 24.5698′N 115° 51.5881′E</td><td>3760.2</td><td>659.2</td><td>659.2</td><td>0.0</td><td>417.05</td><td>63</td><td>7.2</td><td>71</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1499B</td><td></td><td>18° 24.5705′N 115° 51.5990′E</td><td>3758.1</td><td>1081.8</td><td>426.8</td><td>655.0</td><td>150.64</td><td>35</td><td>14.9</td><td>44</td><td>651</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Site U1499 totals:</td><td></td><td>1741.0</td><td>1086.0</td><td>655.0</td><td>567.69</td><td>52</td><td>22.1</td><td>115</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1500A</td><td>SCSII-8B</td><td>18° 18.2762′N 116° 13.1916′E</td><td>3801.7</td><td>854.6</td><td>329.8</td><td>524.8</td><td>93.55</td><td>28</td><td>5.5</td><td>34</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1500B</td><td></td><td>18° 18.2707′N 116° 13.1951′E</td><td>3801.7</td><td>1529.0</td><td>683.0</td><td>846.0</td><td>278.80</td><td>41</td><td>24.8</td><td>81</td><td>842</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Site U1500 totals:</td><td></td><td>2383.6</td><td>1012.8</td><td>1370.8</td><td>372.35</td><td>37</td><td>30.3</td><td>115</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td>Expedition 367 totals:</td><td></td><td>4124.6</td><td>2098.8</td><td>2025.8</td><td>940.04</td><td>45</td><td>52.4</td><td>230</td><td>1493</td></tr></tbody></table>

the pebbles and cobbles are recycled sedimentary rocks (such as sandstone) that contain a variety of individual lithic components including igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic clasts. Although the matrix that likely surrounded these cobbles and pebbles was not recovered, we infer that the matrix is poorly consolidated and washed away by the drilling process. Based on this description, Subunit IXC may represent synrift or prerift sediments.

## Structural geology

The tilting of sedimentary beds and deformation structures observed at Site U1499 are limited to lithostratigraphic Units II, VII, VIII, and IX. The folds, faults, and tilted beds observed in Unit II are related to two slump events that reworked older sediment between younger Units I and III. Tilted beds and faults with slickensides were observed in Units VII and VIII. These faults are linked to compaction processes of the clays, and the tilted beds are associated with sandy layers. Unit IX is divided into three subunits. In Subunit IXA, tilted beds and a downhole increase in clast size, angularity, and proportion of clasts were observed. The matrix-supported breccia of Subunit IXB exhibits no clear deformation structure or tilted sedimentary bedding. Some of the sandstone and breccia clasts in Subunit IXC exhibit veins and fractures. These clasts were transported before sedimentation; therefore, their veins and fractures must have originated in a previous tectonic event.

## Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples at Site U1499 were analyzed for calcareous nannofossil and foraminiferal content, and additional samples were taken from the split-core sections when necessary to refine the ages. Preservation of microfossils varies from poor to very good, and total abundance varies from barren to abundant. Although samples exhibit some degree of reworking, 28 biostratigraphic datums are recognized, revealing that we recovered an apparently continuous succession of the Oligocene to the Pleistocene spanning nannofossil Zones NP25–NN21 and foraminifer Zones M4/M3 to Subzone PT1b. The Pleistocene/Pliocene boundary is located between Cores 367-U1499A-20X and 27X, the Pliocene/Miocene boundary is located between Cores 31X and 43X, and the Miocene/Oligocene boundary is in Section 367-U1499A-30R-2. Sedimentation rates varied from ~80 mm/ky in the late Miocene–early Pliocene and ~50 mm/ky in the early Pliocene–early Pleistocene to ~130 mm/ky in the middle–late Pleistocene. Extremely low sedimentation rates (~8 mm/ky) occurred in the early–middle Miocene

during deposition of Unit VIII. Subunit IXA contains early–late Oligocene microfossils (calcareous nannofossils and foraminifers) with different preservation and abundance, probably influenced by transported and reworked materials.

## Paleomagnetism

Paleomagnetic analysis was conducted on both archive-half sections and discrete samples from the working half. The archive-half sections were measured with the pass-through superconducting rock magnetometer (SRM) with demagnetization steps at 5, 15, and 25 mT. The discrete samples were subjected to alternating field (AF) and thermal demagnetization, and remanence was measured on the spinner magnetometer. We adopted a combination of stepwise AF and thermal demagnetization steps to fully demagnetize the discrete samples and obtain the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM).

Variations in natural remanent magnetization (NRM) intensity are well correlated to observable changes in lithology and magnetic susceptibility; for example, the low NRM intensity at ~60 m (Core 367-U1499A-7H) agrees with the carbonate-rich slump in which magnetic susceptibility values are also low. Drilling-induced remanence was identified and removed in most core sections at AF treatments of 15 mT. In addition, magnetic mineral variations were observed from the demagnetization behavior. From Core 367-U1499B-12R downhole, the drilling overprint becomes stronger and hard to remove with the relatively low AF steps used on the archive-half sections, whereas AF treatments up to 200 mT and temperatures up to 675°C could not fully demagnetize the discrete samples. These characteristics confirm the presence of higher coercivity magnetic minerals, such as hematite, compared with the predominant magnetite and/or titanomagnetite. But further rock magnetic property measurements should be conducted in a shore-based laboratory in order to better understand the compositions.

We constructed the magnetostratigraphy of Holes U1499A and U1499B based on the interpretation of the raw paleomagnetic data that show stable and clear demagnetization behaviors. Declinations from 0 to 162 m have been corrected by the Icefield MI-5 core orientation tool and therefore could help accurately define magnetic reversals. Otherwise, only inclinations are used for polarity interpretations. After correlating the magnetostratigraphy to the standard geomagnetic timescale, we confidently identified the boundary between the Brunhes and Matuyama Chrons at ~110 m. We thus conclude that the middle/early Pleistocene boundary (0.78 Ma) is at
<figure><img src="image_21.png" /><figcaption>Figure F13. Lithostratigraphic summary, Site U1499.</figcaption></figure>

~110 m, the early Pleistocene/late Pliocene boundary is at ~220 m, the late/early Pliocene (3.6 Ma) boundary is at ~260 m, and early Pliocene/late Miocene boundary (5.33 Ma) is at ~370 m.

## Geochemistry

Geochemical analyses were conducted for headspace gas safety monitoring; quantification of sediment CaCO₃, organic carbon, and nitrogen content; and interstitial water characterization. Calcium carbonate contents vary between 0.4 and 82 wt%, with higher values of >20 wt% corresponding to intervals of nannofossil/foraminifer

ooze or chalk. Total organic carbon (TOC) contents mostly range from ~0 to ~1.0 wt%. TOC decreases gradually downhole from 1.0 to 0.3 wt% in the uppermost 110 m corresponding to the base of the sulfate reduction zone, reflecting active degradation of sedimentary organic matter. The TOC to total nitrogen molar ratio (TOC/TN) is mostly <8, indicating that TOC is derived dominantly from a marine source.

Hydrocarbon monitoring shows headspace gas consistently approaching zero throughout the site. Relatively higher methane contents of approximately tens to 6000 ppmv occur across the ~100–
250 m interval, just below the sulfate reduction zone. The overall low methane content indicates limited microbial methanogenesis likely caused by low TOC contents (<0.3 wt%) deeper than 110 m.

We obtained 58 interstitial water samples from Hole U1499A. The inorganic geochemistry of interstitial water is controlled by the remineralization of organic matter and carbonate and clay diagenesis. The sediment rapidly becomes suboxic, as indicated by a Mn peak of ~120 µM at ~6 m. Sulfate reduction coupled with sedimentary organic matter degradation occurs to ~110 m, with near-complete depletion to 257 m before increasing slowly to 16.9 mM at the bottom of Hole U1499A. The interval of near-complete sulfate consumption is also marked by pronounced high Ba concentrations >50 µM, suggesting the dissolution of barite (BaSO₄). The peak alkalinity and steady increase in NH₄⁺ and Br⁻ in the upper 110 m are consistent with progressive remineralization of sedimentary organic matter. The gradual decrease in Ca²⁺ shallower than 80 m suggests active authigenic carbonate precipitation triggered by sulfate reduction. A subsequent downhole increase in Ca²⁺ and Sr²⁺ is likely caused by biogenic carbonate dissolution and recrystallization. Nearly parallel downhole decreases in Mg²⁺ and K⁺ are mostly driven by clay mineral cation exchange and/or clay mineral authigenesis. The lower Cl⁻ and Na⁺ concentrations compared to those of seawater at the bottom of Hole U1499A are mostly driven by the smectite–illite transformation. Elevated Si concentrations of 700–820 µM from the seafloor to 45 m suggest active dissolution of biogenic silica.

## Petrophysics

At Site U1499, measurements of P-wave velocity, bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, and natural gamma radiation (NGR) were made on whole-round cores, and additional measurements were made on split cores and discrete samples, including thermal conductivity; caliper P-wave velocity on the P-wave caliper (PWC); porosity; and bulk, dry, and grain density. In general, bulk density, P-wave velocity, and thermal conductivity increase with depth, whereas porosity decreases with depth as a result of compaction and lithification. However, some properties, such as NGR or magnetic susceptibility, show local variations related to the specific lithology. The soft sediment in the upper 100 m shows rapid compaction with depth, marked by a decrease in porosity and increase in bulk density and thermal conductivity. Four thin volcanic ash layers in the uppermost 50 m are marked by peaks in magnetic susceptibility. The mass transport deposit (48.85–100.04 m) displays low magnetic susceptibility and low NGR, reflecting the high carbonate content of the calcareous ooze. Below these layers downhole to ~890 m, physical properties show small variations; bulk density, P-wave velocity, and thermal conductivity gradually increase, whereas porosity decreases with depth. The NGR and magnetic susceptibility data in this interval do not show much variation. From 830 to 930 m, we observed a general decrease in magnetic susceptibility and NGR where density increases slightly and P-wave velocity increases significantly from 2200 to 2900 m/s. These variations are associated with a significant increase in the carbonate content in the Subunit VIIIIB chalks. The cobbles and pebbles in the deepest part (930–1080 m) show large variations in NGR, bulk density, and P-wave velocity and very low magnetic susceptibility.

## Downhole measurements

Two downhole logging tool strings were run in Hole U1499B, a modified triple combo (sonic velocity, NGR, bulk density, resistivity, and caliper) tool string and the FMS-sonic tool string (FMS resistiv-

ity images and calipers, as well as NGR). We added the velocity tool to the first tool string because sonic velocities were needed for an accurate prediction of basement depth for the subsequent Site U1500 and to better constrain core-log-seismic correlation. We also did not know if hole conditions would allow a second logging run. Although stable borehole conditions in Hole U1499B allowed the second FMS logging run, we did not attempt a check shot due to time constraints and concerns about hole stability. Borehole conditions from the bottom of the casing at ~651 m to the bottom of Hole U1499B at ~1020 m were generally good, with measured diameters from ~10 to 16 inches. Washout zones were observed from 670 to 710 m, which corresponds to an interval of very low core recovery, as well as from 830 to 920 m, affecting quality of the log data in these intervals. Log and core data are generally in good agreement. Downhole logging provided information in zones of poor core recovery in Hole U1499B. The log data from 726 to 739 m exhibits high NGR and low bulk density and P-wave velocity, whereas the data from 820 to 840 m is characterized by a sharp increase in bulk density, a slight increase in P-wave velocity, and an abrupt decrease in NGR compared to average values above and below these depths. The Subunit VIIIIB chalks (~890–930 m) display a sharp decrease in NGR and an increase in bulk density and P-wave velocity with depth, as well as only small variations in resistivity. Deeper than 930 m, bulk density, P-wave velocity, and resistivity show large variability, in part because of the presence of cobbles and pebbles. The quality of the acquired FMS images is strongly influenced by variations in hole diameter; they generally show alternating smooth and patchy textures with contrasting resistivity marking horizontal to slightly tilted bedding downhole to 930 m. The deepest layers of sandstones, breccias, and gravels show highly variable and oblique textures on the FMS images, possibly reflecting the varied orientation of the gravel clasts or the presence of faults and fractures in the gravel or the matrix. In general, the velocity measured with the sonic velocity logging tool match the PWC measurements taken with the caliper on the split cores. Six in situ formation temperature measurements were made in Hole U1499A and give a geothermal gradient of 93°C/km. The estimated heat flow is 110 mW/m², a value in agreement with the general heat flow of the area.

## Correlation to seismic data

We used downhole log data and physical property measurements on cores and samples as well as other available data to correlate Site U1499 data with the available seismic reflection profiles. We also used the Site U1499 density and sonic velocity data to create synthetic seismograms that provided additional constraints on the correlation. Log sonic velocities and PWC velocities are in very good agreement, except for the deepest breccias and gravels (deeper than ~930 m) where measurement on individual pebbles leads to an overestimate of the velocity in the formation. For seismic correlation, we used the PWC and density data from moisture and density (MAD) and gamma ray attenuation (GRA) density data from Hole U1499A (0–655 m), whereas below that depth we used the downhole logging velocity and density data. We used a constant velocity of 2100 m/s in the low-recovery zones (333–406 and 531–561 m), interpreted to be sandy layers, based on the downhole logging velocity values measured at greater depth. The comparison of the time-depth relationship (TDR) obtained for Site U1499 to those for Sites 1148, U1431, and U1433 shows substantial agreement, except for the Site 1148 TDR, which shows higher velocities in the deeper layers. The comparison among the seismic reflectors and the variations in physical properties and lithology characteristics using the
computed Site U1499 TDR shows a good correlation between the main upper reflectors and the poor-recovery sandy intervals. However, the main physical property changes related to the top of the deep gravel layer do not correlate to the reflector observed at ~5.9 s in the seismic profile.

## Site U1500

Site U1500 is located on basement Ridge B and is the most seaward site that Expedition 367 drilled in the SCS COT zone. Ridge B is located ~80 km seaward of the OMH and ~20 km seaward of Ridge A, where Site U1499 was drilled. The goal of drilling here was to sample and log the lowermost sediment and underlying basement rocks to determine basement age and lithology of the COT or embryonic oceanic crust, thus providing a test of different possible models for the processes and rheology controlling the breakup of the continent. Ridge B was expected to have basement of either upper continental crust, lower continental crust, mantle rocks, or oceanic crust. The coring and logging would also constrain the history of the region after rifting by determining the age, water depth, and subsidence rates of the overlying sedimentary packages.

We conducted operations in two holes at Site U1500 (proposed Site SCSI-8B; Sun et al., 2016b) (Table T1). Hole U1500A is located at 18°18.2762'N, 116°13.1916'E in a water depth of 3801.7 m. In Hole U1500A, we drilled without coring from the seafloor to 378.2 m and then cored with the RCB system from 378.2 to 494.6 m and recovered 26.5 m (23%). Thereafter, we drilled without coring from 494.6 to 641.2 m and cored with the RCB system from 641.2 to 854.6 m and recovered 67.2 m (31%).

Hole U1500B is located at 18°18.2707'N, 116°13.1951'E in a water depth of 3801.7 m. After installing casing, we continuously cored the sediment sequence from 846.0 to 1379.1 m (533.1 m cored; 164.7 m recovered; 31%) and then continuously cored 149.9 m into the underlying basalt from 1379.1 to 1529.0 m (114.92 m recovered; 77%). This made Hole U1500B the eighth deepest hole that the R/V JOIDES Resolution has drilled in ODP/Integrated Ocean Drilling Program/IODP history. Three downhole logging strings were run in Hole U1500B from 842 to 1133 m.

## Lithostratigraphy

The cored sediment at Site U1500 is divided into eight lithostratigraphic units (Figure F14). The uppermost 378.2 m of sediment was drilled without coring. Lithostratigraphic Unit I (378.2–410.0 m) is a 31.8 m thick upper Miocene sequence of greenish gray heavily bioturbated clay with silt and sandy silt interbeds. Some of the clay intervals are nannofossil rich. Structure in the clay is mostly massive, but parallel laminations occur in the silt and sandy silt interbeds. Unit II (410.0–494.6 m) is an upper Miocene sequence of interbedded dark greenish gray clay and silt. Recovery was very low for this unit (~8%), which may indicate a change in lithology (e.g., increased abundance of nonlithified sands). This unit is underlain by another interval drilled without coring (494.6–641.2 m).

Unit III (641.2–892.4 m) is defined by upper Miocene interbedded claystone, siltstone, and sandstone. Many of the siltstone and sandstone intervals are organized into a variety of massive and stratified beds that include sedimentary structures such as parallel laminations, cross-stratification, and contorted strata. There are also several massive beds of sandstone that contain pebble-sized mud clasts. The well-organized coarser intervals fine upward into more massive claystone intervals and are interpreted as turbidite sequences. Several of the stratified beds are composed of foraminifer tests.

Unit IV (892.4–1233.3 m) also had very low recovery (15%). This unit is composed of lower upper Miocene very dark greenish gray to dark gray sandstone with dark brown to very dark gray claystone and siltstone intervals. Many of the intervals described in this unit contain interlaminations of silt or sand in a prevailing claystone lithology. Similar to Unit III, sedimentary structures in many of the sandstone and siltstone intervals are interpreted as turbidites. The claystone in some of the cores shows a distinctive color banding, which was observed as a pattern of alternating reddish brown, dark greenish gray, and brownish gray. The color banding appears to be associated with fining-upward grain sizes and varying levels of bioturbation. Sandstone intervals in this unit contain high percentages of K-feldspar, quartz, plagioclase, and mica minerals that may have been sourced from granitic rocks exposed along the southern margin of China.

Unit V (lower middle Miocene) is divided into Subunits VA (1233.30–1272.10 m) and VB (1272.10–1310.98 m) based on the abundance of calcareous material. Subunit VA consists of dark red-dish brown, dark greenish gray, and dusky red homogeneous massive claystone with few sandstone and siltstone interbeds (3–12 cm thick). Subunit VB consists of dark reddish brown, reddish brown, and greenish gray intervals of claystone, nannofossil-rich claystone, claystone with biogenic carbonate, and clay-rich chalk. The greenish gray color banding in Subunits VA and VB is interpreted as diagenetic alteration.

Unit VI (1310.98–1370.33 m) is composed of Oligocene dark greenish gray massive silty claystone with biogenic carbonate and dark gray sandstone. Unit VII (1370.33–1379.10 m) comprises a thin (30 cm thick) Oligocene dusky red claystone. The lowermost 2 cm of this unit has a greenish gray color that marks a sharp horizontal contact with the igneous rocks below in Unit VIII. The basalt in Unit VIII (1379.10–1529.0 m), which is Oligocene or pre-Oligocene in age, contains some fractures that are filled with well-lithified claystone. The claystone contains authigenic carbonate, siliciclastic components, and rare nannofossils. The basalt intervals are sparsely intercalated with dusky red claystone, with the basalt/sediment contacts often associated with chilled glassy margins. Some claystone intervals in the basalt unit show evidence of dolomitization in thin section.

## Igneous petrology

In Hole U1500B, we cored 149.9 m of igneous rocks below the sedimentary section and recovered a total of 114.92 m of basalt. The aphanitic to porphyritic basalts are nonvesicular to moderately vesicular and glassy to hypocrystalline, with the latter ranging from cryptocrystalline to fine grained, making up an aphyric to highly olivine-plagioclase phyric texture (microstructure). These basalts contain numerous 2–5 cm thick baked/chilled contacts and chilled margins, many of the latter with preserved fresh glass, as well as occasional hyaloclastites showing brecciated glass fragments mixed with sediment. The basalts comprise Unit VIII and are divided into igneous lithologic Subunits 1a and 1b according to flow boundaries to distinguish an upper massive lava flow sequence (27.28 m thick) from a lower, predominantly pillow lava flow succession (122.62 m thick) with subordinate thin (<6 m) interbedded lobate, sheet, and massive lava flows. The pillow lobes are well preserved and are separated by chilled, glassy margins (identifying upper and lower chilled margins of individual pillows where possible) and also claystone. Plagioclase phenocrysts are found throughout these basalts, with olivine being an occasional phenocryst. Modal abundances of olivine and plagioclase phenocrysts increase downhole, reaching a
<figure><img src="image_22.png" /><figcaption>Figure F14. Lithostratigraphic summary, Site U1500.</figcaption></figure>

peak between 1420 and 1470 mbsf. Veins occur throughout Unit VIII and are predominantly filled with carbonates and Fe (hydr)oxides, chlorites, zeolites, and silica, as well as sediment. Veins usually show a sharp contact with the host basalt and are either polycrystalline or massive. Claystone is a ubiquitous phase in many carbonate-rich veins, especially in pillow lava flows, and is usually found as very fine aggregates in carbonate veins or as centimeter-thick veins with no preserved textures or structures. Red to green-red halos usually surround the carbonate veins, which are related to the background alteration of interstitial glass, olivine, and occasion-

ally plagioclase and clinopyroxene. Alteration of these basalts remains slight overall, as evidenced by the minimal alteration of interstitial glass as well as the good preservation of plagioclase. Alteration intensity, however, does increase downhole.

## Structural geology

Tilted sedimentary bedding and deformation structures were observed in all lithostratigraphic units. Faults, tilted beds, folds, and mud clasts observed in Units I, II, and III are likely related to gravity-controlled deposition (e.g., debris flows, slumps, slides, etc.).
Unit IV has low recovery and exhibits only a few tilted beds and compaction faults. A total of 47 centimeter-scale faults were measured in the claystone of Units V, VI, and VII. Many of these faults have slickensides and are likely related to clay compaction during lithification. Open fractures and veins are identified in the sparsely to highly plagioclasephyric basalts of Unit VIII. There are no preferred orientations of these structures. Most of the veins are filled by carbonate minerals, Fe oxides, sediment, and secondary minerals. Veins are often haloed by Fe oxide alteration. Vein connectivity is variable; single veins, branched veins, and vein networks were observed. There is no mineral-preferred orientation. Although the seismic profile across Site U1500 shows dipping reflectors in the basalt, we did not observe any clear paleohorizontal or dipping features in these lavas.

## Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples were analyzed for calcareous nannofossil and foraminifer contents. Additional samples were taken from the split-core sections when necessary to refine the ages between core catcher samples. Preservation of microfossils varies from poor to good. Overgrown and abundant broken fragments are common in the sediment sequences. The total abundance varies from barren to abundant, and most samples exhibit some degree of reworking.

Although recovery is low and ~50% of the samples are barren, the succession is apparently continuous and is tentatively assigned a late Oligocene–Miocene age. The late/middle Miocene boundary (11.6 Ma) can be placed between Samples 367-U1500B-37R-1, 40–41 cm, and 44R-CC. Both calcareous nannofossils and planktonic foraminifers indicate an early Miocene to late Oligocene succession in Cores 46R through 56R.

In the calcareous sandstone (Section 56R-1), just above the basalt, some younger species, such as *Praeorbulina circularis* (middle Miocene), *Globigerinoides subquadratus*, and *Orbulina suturalis*, are found together with the typical late Oligocene–early Miocene planktonic foraminiferal species (*Catapsydrax dissimilis*). In the same sample, the nannofossil content is represented by long-range species and cannot give a precise age. However, two samples from the veins and intrapillow fill of the basalts in Unit VIII contain poorly preserved calcareous nannofossils that indicate an Oligocene age. The resolution of the age discrepancy in Core 56R requires further postexpedition studies.

## Geochemistry

At Site U1500, measurements of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen were conducted on one sample per sedimentary core that had relative high recovery, and headspace gas measurements were taken for all sediment cores. In addition, four basalt samples were analyzed for concentrations of major elements and several trace elements using inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Headspace gas values do not exceed 15 ppmv and are mostly below the quantification limit. Carbonate contents are dominated by biogenic carbonate and vary between <1 and 40 wt%, with higher values corresponding to the calcareous-rich lithostratigraphic units. TOC and TOC/TN are low, averaging 0.14 wt% and 4.6, respectively. ICP-AES analyses of basalts from Site U1500 indicate subalkaline mid-ocean-ridge basalt (MORB)-like compositions.

## Paleomagnetism

We conducted AF demagnetization of archive-half sections and AF and thermal demagnetization of representative discrete samples

from both sedimentary successions and the igneous rocks. For the sedimentary samples, AF demagnetization could effectively removed the drilling-induced overprint. The polarity interpretation results based on inclination data from the sedimentary long core and discrete samples are in agreement, which supports our current preliminary polarity patten, but because of discontinuous coring and poor recovery in many cored intervals, we are not able to correlate these results to the standard geomagnetic polarity timescale. The pass-through measurements of the basalts from the archive halves using the SRM effectively removed a low-coercivity component; however, it is not clear if the ChRM or primary magnetization has been reached, partly due to the unavoidable magnetic contamination and partly due to the destructive feature and thus limited AF treatment levels (up to 25 mT). Within a single igneous subunit, basalts sometimes show both positive and negative inclinations upon stepwise AF treatments, which makes it hard to assign reliable polarities. The demagnetization behaviors of the discrete basalt samples are of high noise at higher temperatures, which is probably due to the onset of thermo-viscous remanent magnetization especially in a magnetically nonshielded environment. The close association of negative inclinations, changes in magnetic susceptibility, and demagnetization behavior with fractures in the cores points to the possibility of a secondary chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) as the source of the reversed intervals in the basalt.

## Petrophysics

We conducted measurements of GRA bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, and NGR on whole-round cores and additional measurements on split cores and discrete samples, including thermal conductivity, P-wave velocity on the PWC, porosity, and bulk, dry, and grain density. In general, bulk density, P-wave velocity, and thermal conductivity increase with depth, whereas porosity decreases with depth as a result of compaction and lithification. However, some properties, such as NGR or magnetic susceptibility, show local variations related to the specific lithology. A significant increase in carbonate content in Subunit VB (1272–1311 m) causes a general decrease in NGR and only a slight decrease in magnetic susceptibility. Physical properties change significantly in the basalts of Unit VIII (1379–1529 m). Magnetic susceptibility is two orders of magnitude higher than in the sediment above and varies depending on the degree of alteration. P-wave velocity is also much higher, ranging between 4430 and 5710 m/s, whereas porosity and NGR are very low compared to the sediment above.

## Correlation to seismic data

We used physical property data from cores and samples to correlate Site U1500 data with the available seismic reflection profile. We also used the Site U1500 density and PWC velocity data to create synthetic seismograms that provided additional constraints on the correlation. The TDR obtained for Site U1500 shows substantial agreement with that for Site U1499 and Sites U1431 and U1433; in contrast, the ODP Site 1148 TDR exhibits higher velocities in the deeper layers. The comparison between the seismic reflectors and the variations in physical properties and lithology characteristics using the computed Site U1500 TDR shows good correlation between the high-amplitude seismic reflector at ~6.4 s two-way traveltime (TWT) and the top of the basalts of Unit VIII.

## Downhole measurements

Three downhole logging tool strings were run in Hole U1500B: a modified triple combo (sonic velocity, NGR, bulk density, resistivity,
<figure><img src="image_23.png" /><figcaption>Figure F15. Bathymetry at Site U1501 and location of the site in relation to seismic Lines 15ecLW1 and 15ecLW8.</figcaption></figure>

and caliper), the FMS-sonic (FMS resistivity images and calipers, as well as NGR), and the VSI (check shot and NGR). During the first run, the tool string encountered an obstruction at 4946 m wireline log depth below rig floor (WRF; ~1133 m), and we were unsuccessful in getting the tool string to pass below this depth. We collected FMS data from ~1044 m uphole to the bottom of the casing (842 m). Although the hole had many zones that were significantly enlarged, initial observations of the real-time FMS data indicate that some intervals exhibit relatively good caliper contact and should provide useful resistivity images. A seismic check shot survey with the VSI successfully collected data at one depth in the open hole and at the base of the casing. Because this was the last operation conducted during Expedition 367 and we only had a 1 day transit to Hong Kong, data processing and full evaluation of the log data will be conducted after Expedition 367.

# Site U1501

## Background and objectives

Site U1501 (proposed Site SCSIII-41A; 18°53.0923′N, 115°45.9455′E) (Sun et al., 2016b) in the SCS northern margin (Figure F3) is located on a broad regional basement high (OMH). The OMH is the most landward of four distinct highs in the COT and is followed seaward by Ridges A, B, and C (Figures F4, F5, F15). Site U1501 is located at 2845.8 m below sea level (mbsl). Small rift basins of presumed Paleogene age are located on top of the OMH (Figure F5). These basins can be traced landward into much deeper half-graben basins that formed during the main phase of crustal extension. The rift basins located on the OMH, therefore, offer options to recover the stratigraphy of these basins by drilling to moderate depths, testing existing stratigraphic interpretations, and extrapolating the findings margin wide. Recovering and characterizing these sequences were key objectives at Site U1501, and the specific goal was to constrain the timing and duration of crustal extension, the tectonic vertical movements during rifting, and the subsequent postrift thermal subsidence. The crystalline basement at Site U1501

is most likely located far below the acoustic basement at ≈600 m and was not an objective for this site.

At 2846 mbsl, Site U1501 is one of the few ODP and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program sites in the SCS above the modern CCD of the SCS. Sites U1504 and U1505, also at the OMH, are situated at <3000 mbsl. The younger stratigraphy is therefore also the focus of some secondary scientific objectives related to Neogene environmental development of the SCS and adjacent landmasses of Southeast Asia. Among these secondary objectives are to (1) reconstruct the history of the east Asian monsoon evolution and of deep-water exchanges between the SCS and Pacific Ocean and (2) explore the sedimentary responses to the Cenozoic regional tectonic and environmental development of the Southeast Asia margin.

## Operations

We conducted operations in four holes at Site U1501 (Table T2). In Holes U1501A and U1501B, Core 1H missed the sediment-water interface and retrieved full core barrels, indicating that the core was shot from below the seafloor. Hole U1501C (18°53.0919′N, 115°45.9485′E; 2846 mbsl) was cored with the APC system from the seafloor to 461.8 m and recovered 447.8 m (96.3%). Hole U1501D (18°53.0929′N, 115°45.9370′E; 2846 mbsl) was drilled without coring from the seafloor to 433.5 m and then cored with the RCB system to 644.3 m. A total of 78.8 m of core was recovered (37.4%). Hole U1501D was logged with the triple combo tool string from 113 to 299.3 m.

## Lithostratigraphy

The sedimentary succession recovered at Site U1501 is composed of clay-rich nannofossil ooze, silty clay, clayey silt, sand, siltstone, sandstone with minor conglomerate, and rare volcanic ash. The succession is divided into three major lithostratigraphic units (I, II, and III) distinguished on the basis of sediment composition, particularly the relative abundance of the calcareous and siliciclastic fractions (Figure F16).

Lithostratigraphic Unit I is a 303 m thick, Holocene–upper Oligocene succession dominated by clay-rich nannofossil ooze and nannofossil ooze with clay, with minor amounts of nannofossil-rich foraminifer sand or silty sand. A felsic volcanic ash layer occurs in Section 368-U1501A-1H-7, and an ash pod was observed in Section 368-U1501C-3H-1. Unit I is divided into the following subunits:

* Subunit IA (0–25.47 m),

* Subunit IB (25.47–66.17 m),

* Subunit IC (66.30–156.70 m),

* Subunit ID (156.80–191.99 m),

* Subunit IE (191.99–293.09 m), and

* Subunit IF (293.90–303.01 m).

These divisions are based on changes in lithology, particularly the clay to nannofossil ratio, the presence and abundance of foraminifers, and/or physical properties. The lower contact of Unit I is erosional and marked by the emplacement of a poorly sorted sandy layer. At the boundary, marked changes in P-wave velocity, NGR, magnetic susceptibility, porosity, MAD, color, carbonate content, and biostratigraphy indicate a small hiatus (Figure F16). Unit I was deposited in a deep-marine environment, and lithologic changes between subunits likely reflect the amount of terrigenous input into a relatively open ocean setting. This input may be delivered as buoyant sediment plumes from shallower shelf environments and rarely by weak (distal) turbidity currents. Soft-sediment deformation in Subunit IB indicates slumping downslope of parts of the sequence.
<table><caption>Table T2. Expedition 368 hole summary. — = no data. Download table in CSV format.</caption><thead><tr><th>Hole</th><th>Proposed site</th><th>Location</th><th>Water depth (m)</th><th>Total penetration (m)</th><th>Cored interval (m)</th><th>Drilled interval without coring (m)</th><th>Core recovery (m)</th><th>Core recovery (%)</th><th>Time on hole (days)</th><th>Cores (N)</th><th>Depth of casing (m)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>U1501A</td><td>SCSII-41A</td><td>18° 53.0922'N<br>115° 45.9483'E</td><td>2857.11</td><td>9.5</td><td>9.5</td><td>—</td><td>9.73</td><td>102.42</td><td>0.66</td><td>1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1501B</td><td></td><td>18° 53.0922'N<br>115° 45.9483'E</td><td>2852.11</td><td>9.5</td><td>9.5</td><td>—</td><td>9.83</td><td>103.47</td><td>0.05</td><td>1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1501C</td><td></td><td>18° 53.0919'N<br>115° 45.9485'E</td><td>2845.81</td><td>461.9</td><td>461.9</td><td>—</td><td>444.77</td><td>96.29</td><td>3.53</td><td>62</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1501D</td><td></td><td>18° 53.0929'N<br>115° 45.9370'E</td><td>2845.82</td><td>644.3</td><td>210.8</td><td>433.5</td><td>78.77</td><td>37.37</td><td>5.15</td><td>26</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Site U1501 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1125.2</td><td>691.7</td><td>433.5</td><td>523.54</td><td>49.09</td><td>9.39</td><td>90</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1502A</td><td>SCSII-17A</td><td>18°27.8720'N<br>116°13.8381'E</td><td>3763.72</td><td>758.2</td><td>383.2</td><td>375.0</td><td>176.81</td><td>46.14</td><td>5.22</td><td>40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1502B</td><td></td><td>18°27.8798'N<br>116°13.8409'E</td><td>3763.58</td><td>920.8</td><td>193.1</td><td>727.7</td><td>131.57</td><td>68.14</td><td>14.06</td><td>36</td><td>723.7</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Site U1502 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1679.0</td><td>576.3</td><td>1102.7</td><td>308.38</td><td>53.51</td><td>19.28</td><td>76</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1503A</td><td>SCSII-9B</td><td>18° 8.6300'N<br>116° 18.8456'E</td><td>3867.71</td><td>995.1</td><td>—</td><td>995.1</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.00</td><td>11.88</td><td>0</td><td>991.5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Site U1503 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>995.1</td><td>—</td><td>995.1</td><td>0</td><td>0.00</td><td>11.88</td><td>0</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1504A</td><td>SCSII-27A</td><td>18°50.9199'N<br>116°14.5397'E</td><td>2816.57</td><td>165.5</td><td>165.5</td><td>—</td><td>52.93</td><td>31.98</td><td>2.17</td><td>21</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1504B</td><td></td><td>18°50.8213'N<br>116°14.5978'E</td><td>2842.97</td><td>200</td><td>111.8</td><td>88.2</td><td>21.48</td><td>19.21</td><td>3.33</td><td>19</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Site U1504 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>365.5</td><td>277.3</td><td>88.2</td><td>74.41</td><td>26.83</td><td>5.50</td><td>40</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1505A</td><td>SCSII-3D</td><td>18°55.0560'N<br>115°51.5369'E</td><td>2916.57</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td><td>—</td><td>0.38</td><td>126.67</td><td>0.59</td><td>1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1505B</td><td></td><td>18°55.0562'N<br>115°51.5370'E</td><td>2918.57</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>3.23</td><td>107.67</td><td>0.04</td><td>1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1505C</td><td></td><td>18°55.0570'N<br>115°51.5491'E</td><td>2917.37</td><td>480.2</td><td>480.2</td><td>—</td><td>480.15</td><td>99.99</td><td>4.29</td><td>64</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>U1505D</td><td></td><td>18°55.0458'N<br>115°51.5501'E</td><td>2917.00</td><td>184.5</td><td>184.5</td><td>—</td><td>191.43</td><td>103.76</td><td>1.2</td><td>20</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Site U1505 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>668.0</td><td>668.0</td><td>—</td><td>675.19</td><td>101.08</td><td>6.12</td><td>86</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td colspan="12">Expedition 368 totals:</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>4832.8</td><td>2213.3</td><td>2619.5</td><td>1601.08</td><td>138.24</td><td>52.17</td><td>292</td><td>—</td></tr></tbody></table>

Lithostratigraphic Unit II is 296 m thick and late Oligocene to late Eocene in age. The unit consists of variable amounts of clay, silt, and sand with minor nannofossil-rich clay, nannofossil ooze, and silt with organic matter. Gravel-sized grains occur, including shell fragments and glauconite, as well as carbonate and pyrite concre- tions. Unit II is divided into six subunits:

* Subunit IIA (303.01–385.26 m),

* Subunit IIB (388.80–452.69 m),

* Subunit IIC (452.60–482.33 m),

* Subunit IID (491.00–519.80 m),

* Subunit IIE (529.30–548.64 m), and

* Subunit IIF (548.64–598.91 m).

The uppermost two subunits define a fining-upward succession of glauconite-sand dominated to siltstone and clay overlain by clay with nannofossils. Subunits IIC and IE are dominated by sandstone with calcite; Subunit IID has more fine-grained, organic-rich litho- logies; and Subunit IIF is similar to Subunit IIB but has more coarse-grained sediment and distinctive weak red and reddish gray intervals in the green glauconite-bearing sands. Coarse sand– to pebble-sized shell fragments are common in Unit II, and coral frag- ments were occasionally observed in the upper part of the unit. Glauconite and quartz minerals dominate the siliciclastic grain component. Diagenetic pyrite is common. Unit II most likely rep- resents a gradual change upward from shallow-water (outer shelf or upper continental slope) to deep-water (lower slope) depositional environments. The Unit II/III boundary was not recovered but is

marked by an abrupt change in magnetic susceptibility, NGR, and P-wave velocity. A change in the apparent dip of strata from near horizontal in Unit II to ~20° in Unit III suggests that the contact is unconformable.

Lithostratigraphic Unit III (598.91 m to the bottom of the hole) is well lithified and composed of poorly sorted, feldspar-rich sand- stone interbedded with moderately to well-sorted, medium- to fine- grained sandstone and, rarely, siltstone and poorly sorted conglom- erate. The age is unknown because no fossils were recognized. Unit III is divided into two subunits: IIIA (598.91–629.79 m) and IIIB (629.79–643.56 m). Subunit IIIA is composed of coarse-grained heterolithic sandstone, sandstone with calcite clasts, and minor conglomerate and siltstone. Pebble- to cobble-sized clasts include felsic intrusive and volcanic rocks, sedimentary rocks, metamor- phic rocks, and rare gabbro. Subunit IIIB consists of sandstone and minor sandstone with organic matter. Subunit IIIB is finer grained than Subunit IIIA and has finely laminated intervals. We speculate that Unit III was formed in continental to littoral environments with a provenance not far from the site.

Structural geology

Unit I shows predominantly horizontal to subhorizontal bed- ding with local soft-sediment deformation structures such as slump folds. Unit I is devoid of any structures related to tectonic deforma- tion, apart from some rare normal faults with minor offsets.

Unit II is characterized by subhorizontal to gently dipping bed- ding. Steep dips up to 40° are locally observed in close relation to
<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>Figure F16. Lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic, and magnetostratigraphic summary, Site U1501.</figcaption></figure>

parallel lamination and are therefore interpreted as cross-laminae. In contrast to Unit I, deformation structures were observed in Unit II, although their occurrence is rather heterogeneously distributed. Planar to irregular millimeter-scale normal faults and joints were observed in Subunit IIA, typically with offsets ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 cm and apparent dips of 10°–40°. Striations and slickensides were documented locally where the surfaces of such structures are exposed. Deformation in the underlying Subunits IIC–IIF is essen-

tially characterized by randomly distributed occurrence of single to branched uniform calcite and quartz veins. Recognition of deformational structures was difficult due to drilling disturbance throughout this unit.

The acoustic basement marks the top of Unit III. This unit shows a weak tilting of stratified beds expressed in apparent dips on split core surfaces up to ~20°. Again, deformation structures remain scarce and heterogeneously distributed in Unit III. The recognized
structures consist of veins, fractures, and local microfaults associ-
ated with cataclastic fault gouge.

In conclusion, despite the various tilting of reflectors (~5°) and
the vicinity of extensional structures observed on seismic profiles,
only weak evidence of bedding tilting and/or deformation struc-
tures were observed at this site, possibly due to the nature of the
sediments.

Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples at Site U1501 were analyzed for calcar-
eous nannofossils, diatoms, and foraminifers, with select core
catchers examined for ostracods. Additional samples were taken
from the split working-half sections when necessary to refine the
ages between core catcher samples. Preservation of calcareous
microfossils varies from good in Unit I (Cores 368-U1501A-1H,
368-U1501B-1H, and 368-U1501C-1H through 44X) to poor in
Units II and III (Cores 368-U1501C-45X through 62X and 368-
U1501D-2R through 5R). Planktonic foraminifers and calcareous
nannofossils are abundant in Unit I, common to rare in Unit II and
upper Unit III, and barren in the rest of Unit III (Cores 368-
U1501D-6R through 27R). Diatoms are few with moderate preserva-
tion in Samples 368-U1501A-1H-CC, 368-U1501B-1H-CC, and
368-U1501C-1H-CC and 2H-CC. The rest of the core catcher sam-
ples are barren of diatoms with the exception of Samples 368-
U1501C-3H-CC, 4H-CC, 33F-CC through 35F-CC, and 46X-CC, in
which diatoms are rare with poor preservation. Diatoms are com-
mon in burrows found in interval 368-U1501C-35F-1, 118–119 cm,
with poor preservation.

Forty biostratigraphic datums were identified in a mostly con-
tinuous succession from the Eocene to Holocene, which indicates
that Holes U1501C and U1501D penetrated late Eocene or older
strata (Figure F16). The Pleistocene/Pliocene boundary (~2.6 Ma)
was placed in Core 368-U1501C-7H, the Pliocene/Miocene bound-
ary (~5.3 Ma) in Core 9H, the Miocene/Oligocene boundary (~23.0
Ma) between Cores 41X and 42X, and the Oligocene/Eocene
boundary (~33.9 Ma) between Cores 53X and 54X. Sedimentation
rates vary from ~13 mm/ky in the early Oligocene, ~11 mm/ky in
the Miocene, and ~14 mm/ky in the Pliocene to 24 mm/ky in the
Pleistocene. Low sediment accumulation rates (~3.6 mm/ky) during
the late Eocene through the early Oligocene and in the late Miocene
suggest the presence of hiatuses in the sedimentary record during
these periods. In contrast, higher sediment accumulation rates (35
mm/ky) exist during the late Oligocene and the early Miocene.

Predominance of shallow-water benthic foraminifer and os-
tracod assemblages in Cores 368-U1501C-45X through 62X and
368-U1501D-2R through 6R indicate an upper bathyal to continen-
tal shelf paleoenvironment during the Eocene to the early Oligo-
cene. Predominantly abyssal benthic foraminifers and ostracods
above Core 368-U1501C-44X indicate that deep-water conditions
existed in this part of the SCS since the early Oligocene.

Paleomagnetism

Paleomagnetic investigations combined measurement and in-
line AF demagnetization of archive-half sections on the 2G Enter-
prises SRM with the measurement of discrete samples either AF or
thermally demagnetized.

The rock magnetic experiments on six representative samples
from Hole U1501C show saturation remanent magnetization
(SIRM)/χ ratios between 12.8 and 14.6 kA/m, indicating the pre-
dominance of greigite in Unit I of Hole U1501C, also documented
by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in 2–10 µm grains. Ther-
mal demagnetization behaviors show that greigite dominates the

NRM, at least downhole to 83 m. However, the magnetic remanence
left above 575°C suggests contributions from additional phases such
as maghemite (Curie temperature [T<sub>C</sub>] = ~590°-675°C) or hematite
(T<sub>C</sub> = ~675°C).

Both AF and thermal treatments on discrete samples success-
fully removed the steep low-temperature/coercivity component
that represents the drilling overprint. The mean inclination gath-
ered from the high-temperature component is 37.3° ± 6.6°, corre-
sponding to a paleolatitude of 20.8° ± 3.3° for Unit I (see
*Lithostratigraphy*). Many of the AF-demagnetized discrete sam-
ples reveal trends of reversed or normal polarity in the last step of
demagnetization (50 mT) and are more difficult to interpret.

The magnetostratigraphy in Holes U1501C and U1501D is
based on directions derived from the raw moments measured by the
SRM after 25 mT demagnetization step and from the corroborative
evidence from discrete samples. Magnetostratigraphy was cor-
related to the standard timescale and plotted along with the tie
points from the microfossil ages from shipboard paleontologists.
The paleomagnetic and paleontological age constraints match well
over most of the section (Figure F16). A succession of eight normal
and five reversed events was recognized in Hole U1501D. However,
the lack of biostratigraphic constraints throughout Hole U1501D
prevented even a tentative correlation of these events with the stan-
dard timescale.

Geochemistry

Interstitial water samples were obtained downcore to 450 m (Subunit IIB). In Unit I, variations are mainly the result of diagenetic and microbial processes, and measurements of alkalinity, phosphate, ammonia, and sulfate are in the typical ranges for the region (3.5–5 mM alkalinity, 250–510 µM phosphate, <30 µM ammonia, and <26 µM sulfate). However, more atypically (particularly when compared to Expedition 367 Site U1499), the main changes associated with microbial processes are notable only in the uppermost 25 m in Subunit IA and are typical of organic matter degradation. Deeper than 25 m in Unit I, changes in interstitial water chemistry appear inhibited until 300 m. These changes may be a consequence of the low organic carbon concentration and high carbonate content (~50 wt%) of Unit I. Decreases in sulfate concentrations with depth are more pronounced in Unit II (>300 m), and in this zone there is heavy pyritization and total sulfur (TS) contents are high, suggesting sulfate reduction has taken place. In the uppermost part of Unit II (300–370 m), chloride, bromide, and sodium are notably lower (chloride = 500 mM, cf. 565 mM; bromide = 0.75 mM, cf. 0.9 mM; and sodium = 410 mM, cf. 480 mM). This difference in interstitial water chemical composition is sharp and could result from pressure-isolated units retaining a distinct formation water chemistry or from the migration of chloride-poor formation water.

Headspace gas concentrations are below background laboratory
levels in all samples collected from Site U1501 (<1% ppmv). TOC
content is typically <0.5 wt% in Unit I, except from 0 to 50 m (Sub-
unit IA). In this interval, a typical black marine mud has a TOC of
~1 wt%. TOC was also typically <0.5 wt% in Units II and III, except
for a few carbonaceous lithologies: sandstones with plant phyto-
clasts associated with an ash-rich boghead coal in Unit II (interval
368-U1501D-9R-1, 10–15 cm) and a bitumen-impregnated sand-
stone in Unit III (interval 27R-1, 12–16 cm). TS content is low in
Unit I: ~1 wt% in Subunit IA and below effective shipboard detec-
tion limits of 0.01 wt% for the rest of Unit I. TS content is higher in
Unit II; >1 wt% in the muddier uppermost part of Unit II and an
average of 0.5 wt% in the sandier, deeper part.
Elemental compositions primarily reflect geological units and changes in lithology. In Unit I, carbonate contents are high and exceed 50 wt% in foraminifer-rich intervals (compositionally a limestone). In Units II and III, carbonate is less common, and the units are predominantly siliciclastic with a distinction between units that are mud rich and feldspathic and sandier units toward the base of the hole. Calcium and strontium are associated with biogenic sediments in Unit I, but in deeper units they covary with aluminum. In the base of Units II and III, sodium and potassium are both high, which is consistent with the dominant presence of feldspathic sediments. The higher aluminum proportion in the uppermost part of Unit II is consistent with the muddier, clay-rich lithologies present here.

## Physical properties

Hole U150A is divided into four units based on the sediment and rock physical properties. Physical properties (PP) Unit 1 (0–300 m) experienced the most evident changes in sediment compaction, which is expressed by increasing bulk density (from 1.4 to 2.0 g/cm³) and P-wave velocity (from 1450 to 1930 m/s) and decreasing porosity (from 85% to 45%) with depth. Because PP Unit 1 consists mostly of calcareous ooze, it has relatively low NGR (between 20 and 40 counts/s) and magnetic susceptibility (between 10⁻⁶ and 10⁻⁵ SI). The onset of PP Unit 2 (300–450 m) is marked by a rapid increase in NGR and porosity and a rapid decrease in bulk density and P-wave velocity, corresponding to a shift to a different lithologic unit with sand, silt, and clay-enriched sediments. In the entire unit, NGR is persistently high (60–80 counts/s), whereas magnetic susceptibility remains as low as 10 × 10⁻⁵ SI. P-wave velocity and bulk density continue to increase with core depth. Most physical properties of PP Unit 3 (450–600 m) have similar values to those of Unit 2, except that P-wave velocity is extremely high, up to 4000–6000 m/s at some interbeds, and bulk density and porosity increase and decrease to 2.6 g/cm³ and 2%–3%, respectively, at parallel depths. PP Unit 4 (600–657 m) is distinct from other units due to higher mean NGR (80 counts/s), bulk density (2.6 g/cm³), magnetic susceptibility (500 × 10⁻⁵ SI), and P-wave velocity (4500 m/s). Throughout the hole (0–657 m), thermal conductivity values increase from 0.7 to 3.4 W/(m·K), most likely as a result of increasing sediment compaction and changes in sediment compositions. L* reflectance values are highly relevant to weight percent carbonate in sediments, which exhibit relatively high L* values between 100 and 160 in the upper 300 m and thereafter remain as low as 90.

## Downhole measurements

Wireline logging was conducted in Hole U1501D using a modified triple combo tool string that included the Hostile Environment Natural Gamma Ray Sonde (HNGS), Hostile Environment Litho-Density Sonde (HLDS), High-Resolution Laterolog Array (HRLA), and magnetic susceptibility sonde (MSS). The triple combo run collected good data between 115.1 m (base of the drill pipe) and 300 m, where it encountered an impenetrable obstruction. Four logging units are defined:

* Logging Unit 1 (base of the drill pipe to 190 m wireline depth below seafloor [WSF]) is characterized by intervals of large hole diameter and relatively high variability in NGR and magnetic susceptibility.

* Logging Unit 2 (190–260 m WSF) is characterized by a relatively constant hole diameter, relatively homogeneous logs, and sub-meter-scale layering.

* Logging Unit 3 (260–275 m WSF) again shows a relatively large hole diameter, as well high variability in NGR, density, and resistivity logs.

* Logging Unit 4 (275–300 m WSF) exhibits relatively large values of resistivity and magnetic susceptibility.

The upward log pass indicated a collapsed hole at ~156.3 m drilling depth below seafloor (DSF) on the caliper curve, and for safety reasons no further attempts to descend deeper than that undergauge spot were made. Because the interval of the collapsed hole was located only ~40 m below the base of the pipe, the originally planned FMS-sonic tool string was not run. Four in situ formation temperature measurements were made in Hole U1501C, yielding a geothermal gradient of 81.4°C/km and a calculated heat flow of 100.1 mW/m². These values are comparable to the relatively high values observed at some ODP and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program sites in this part of the SCS.

# Site U1502

## Background and objectives

Site U1502 (proposed Site SCSIII-17A; Sun et al., 2016b) in the SCS northern margin (Figures F3, F17) is located at 3764 mbln on a prominent basement ridge (A) in the COT (Figure F5). Ridge A is one of four distinct basement highs found across the COT. The OMH is the most landward of these highs and is followed seaward by the nearly parallel Ridges A, B, and C. A key objective of Expeditions 367 and 368 was to examine the nature of the crust in Ridge A. This ridge is considered to be a pivotal element in the transition from continental to oceanic crust. Hence, the main objective of Site U1502 was to drill through synrift deposits overlying an interpreted shallow-dipping (~20°) fault zone and into the crystalline basement below the fault. Information on the nature and age of the synrift deposits overlying the fault, as well as the nature and age of the overlying

Figure F17. Bathymetry at Site U1502 and location of the site in relation to seismic Lines 15ecLW7, 15ecLW3, and 08ec2660. Note that the site is not at the exact crossing of Lines 15ecLW7 and 15ecLW3.

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>
ing sediments and associated seismic unconformities, formed another target with the objective of constraining basin subsidence.

## Operations

We conducted operations in two holes at Site U1502 (Table T2). Hole U1502A is located at 18°27.8720′N, 116°13.8381′E, at 3763 mbl. Our operations in Hole U1502A were designed to provide information on formation characteristics and drilling conditions so that we could decide the length of casing to drill into the seafloor in deep-penetration Hole U1502B. Given this purpose and the amount of time to drill the second, deep hole, we did not core continuously in Hole U1502A. Instead, we drilled without coring from the seafloor to 375.0 m and cored with the RCB system from 375.0 to 758.2 m, recovering 176.81 m (46%). Hole U1502B is located at 18°27.8798′N, 116°13.8409′E, at 3763.6 mbl. In Hole U1502B, we drilled a reentry funnel and 727.7 m of 10¾ inch casing into the seafloor; cored with the RCB system through the sediment-basalt transition (727.7–739.16 m) and 180 m into the underlying basalt (739.16–920.95 m), recovering 128 m (70%); and collected downhole log data with the triple combo tool string and a check shot with the VSI tool string.

## Lithostratigraphy

The sedimentary succession recovered at Site U1502 extends from the early Oligocene (possibly late Eocene) to the late Miocene. The succession includes four sedimentary units (I and III–V) that are composed of mainly clay, nannofossil-rich clay, biosiliceous-rich clay, limestone, and clast-rich clay and two igneous units (II and VI) that are mainly composed of basalt. The base of the sedimentary succession is a sequence of clay and metasediments (dolomite, marble and dolomitic limestone) that possibly forms the contact with a unit of altered basalt (Unit VI) (Figure F18).

Late Miocene to late Oligocene lithostratigraphic Unit I is divided into five subunits. Subunit IA (Hole U1502A = 375.00–486.82 m) is composed of dark gray, gray, dark greenish gray, and greenish gray silty clay, clay with nannofossils, and nannofossil-rich clay intercalated with dark grayish brown, grayish brown, and brown clay with nannofossils, with minor dark greenish gray sandy clay with calcite. Subunit IB (Hole U1502A = 490.20–599.57 m) is composed of alternating intervals of brown and greenish gray clay, silty clay, and clayey silt. Sandy intervals are rare. Recovery in Subunits IA and IB was very poor, which might be due to the occurrence of thick sand beds that were washed out. Subunit IC (Hole U1502A = 599.57–602.39 m) is composed of greenish gray and reddish gray foraminifer-rich clayey siltstone to sandstone with parallel laminations and convolute bedding, with thin layers of pinkish gray foraminiferal chalk. Subunit ID (Hole U1502A = 602.39–724.03 m) is mainly composed of alternating greenish and brownish gray and grayish brown clay, silty clay, clayey silt, and clay with silt (Cores 368-U1502A-25R through 32R), but brown colors dominate Cores 33R through 38R. Nannofossils are abundant in the lowermost ~4 m of this subunit. Subunit IE (Hole U1502A = 724.03–734.87 m; Hole U1502B; 727.79–727.96 m) is composed of brown nannofossil-rich clay with foraminifers and nannofossil-rich clay with pale green colored halos around fractures. The sediments of Unit I are interpreted as having been deposited in a deep-marine environment. Fining-upward intervals in Subunits IA–IC are interpreted as turbidites.

Unit II is a highly altered greenish gray basalt clast recovered from Hole U1502B at 727.96–728.04 m. The primary mineral phases are replaced by an alteration-mineral assemblage.

Unit III (Hole U1502A = 739.10–739.16 m; Hole U1502B = 728.04–733.82 m) is composed of brownish yellow, very hard, poorly sorted breccia. The granule- to pebble-size siliceous clasts consist of alteration minerals (Fe hydroxides) cemented by a matrix of annealed quartz in various grain sizes.

Unit IV (Hole U1502A = 739.16–747.20 m) consists of biosiliceous-rich silty clay. Diatoms, sponge spicules, and radiolarians are abundant in the upper part, but the abundance of both nannofossils and diatoms decreases rapidly downhole from Section 368-U1502A-40R-1 to Section 40R-3. Pyrite occurs as centimeter-sized patches and along cracks. The layering in Unit IV is inclined and may be slightly deformed.

Unit V (Hole U1502A = 747.20–749.01 m; Hole U1502B = 733.82–739.16 m) is an interval of alternating metasediments (dolomite marble, dolomitic limestone, and clast-rich clay). The dolomite marble is dominated by very fine grained dolomite (~95%) with minor amounts of magnetite (~3%) and calcite (~2%). The annealing texture is equigranular and crossed by fine-grained dark gray bands. The presence of magnetite explains the extraordinarily high magnetic susceptibility of this unit. The gray, fine-grained dolomitic limestone in Hole U1502B is intercalated with well-consolidated, very dark greenish gray clay with 10%–15% igneous clasts. The sediment is partially overprinted with alteration caused by secondary high-temperature processes (e.g., hydrothermal fluid sediment interaction or contact metamorphism).

Unit VI (Hole U1502A = 749.01–750.67 m; Hole U1502B = 739.16–920.95 m) consists of highly altered basaltic breccia, brecciated basalt, pillow basalt, and sheet basalt. The unit is divided into two subunits. Subunit VIA is composed of highly altered basaltic breccia and brecciated basalt with minor sheet basalt, chert, and claystone and very minor pillow basalt. Subunit VIB is dominated by altered pillow basalt and sheet flows and is less brecciated than Subunit VIA.

## Igneous petrology

At Site U1502, we recovered two igneous lithologic units. Unit 1 (lithostratigraphic Unit II) is represented by just three small, aphanitic, fine-grained basalt fragments that contain rare plagioclase phenocrysts (Figure F19). Alteration of Unit 1 is intense, with most of the groundmass replaced by green clay minerals, clinozoisite, zeolites, and Fe (hydr)oxides.

Unit 2 (lithostratigraphic Unit VI) comprises a 182 m thick sequence of highly altered aphyric to highly plagioclase porphyritic basalts with minor chert (Figure F19). These basalts are divided into two igneous subunits (2a and 2b) based on flow morphology and alteration style: an upper brecciated and fractured massive lava flow sequence (Subunit 2a) and a lower sequence of interbedded pillow flows with lobate and sheet lava flows in which the alteration style is characterized by intense veining (Subunit 2b). Subunit 2a is characterized by highly altered breccia clasts of sparsely to moderately phyric basalt in a matrix of carbonates, epidote, chlorite, Fe (hydr)oxides, quartz, zeolite minerals, and clay minerals. The clasts show an alteration assemblage similar to the matrix, with remnant plagioclase and secondary pyrite. Subunit 2b consists of aphyric to highly plagioclase phytic (>30%) basalts with abundant chlorite and sulfides, as well as epidote, clay minerals, carbonates, zeolites, and opaque minerals.

All of Unit 2 has undergone some degree of hydrothermal alteration. This alteration varies from complete replacement of the rock, where the original composition and texture are difficult to determine, to replacement of mineral phases with little change to the tex-
<figure><img src="image_26.png" /><figcaption>Figure F18. Lithostratigraphic summary with simplified lithology and unit descriptions, Holes U1502A and U1502B.</figcaption></figure>

Glassy pillow rinds are completely replaced, and multiple phases of veining and halos are ubiquitous throughout the rocks. Three vein types were observed: (1) white to green to black silica-epidote veins, (2) apple green pyrite-epidote veins, and (3) white silica and/or calcite veins. Sulfide mineralization (disseminated and veined) is widespread throughout Unit 2 and is dominated by pyrite, with minor sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and covellite.

Handheld portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) analyses show no significant differences in contents of alteration-resistant elements such as Ti and Zr in Unit 2, but Subunit 2a has lower MgO, FeO, and MnO than Subunit 2b, which is consistent with the higher degree of alteration. Subunit 2b is also strongly affected by secondary alteration, but areas of less intense alteration are indicated by higher magnetic susceptibility and high CaO and Fe₂O₃ contents. Unit 1
Figure F19. Lithostratigraphic summary with main igneous lithologies and deformation structures, Holes U1502A and U1502B. A. Highly plagioclase-phyric basalt with up to 50% plagioclase phenocrysts. B. Highly altered, sparsely plagioclasephyric pillow basalt with a well-preserved pillow. C. Moderately altered aphyric basalt flow with sparse vesicles. Note the change to a bluish gray color. D. Slump folds. E. Microfaults showing striations/slickensides on exposed surfaces. F. Distributed shear geometries with shear bands and tilted bedding. G. Brecciated basalt. H. Basaltic breccia. I. Network of composite epidote-rich veins.

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /></figure>

appears to be compositionally distinct from Unit 2 and has, for example, higher Ti/Zr ratios.

## Structural geology

Deformation structures are scarce in Unit I above Core 368-U1502A-37R, with only a local, convolutely bedded sequence in

Core 25R. Downhole from Core 37R at ~700 m, a gradual increase in deformation structures was observed (Figure F19). Cores 37R through 39R are characterized by microfaults, as evidenced by downward-dip plunging striations and slickensides on exposed fracture surfaces, systematically associated with greenish halos. No deformation structures were encountered in Unit II. Unit III con-
sists of extremely silicified breccia that was poorly recovered. The nature of this breccia, however, as sedimentary, tectonic, or hydrothermal remains unconstrained at the moment. In Unit IV, a small-scale transition from distributed to localized shear in un lithified sediments was documented. No deformation structures were encountered in Unit V.

Unit VI is essentially composed of basalts that were heterogeneously affected by brecciation and veining associated with the circulation of hydrothermal fluids. Subunit VIA is dominated by brecciated basalt/basaltic breccia, whereas Subunit VIB comprises a rather coherent series of lava flows crosscut by a multistage network of polymineralic veins. The uppermost part of Unit VI contains severely fractured and fragmented basalt locally filled by fine-grained unconsolidated greenish rock. Subunit VIA is characterized by diverse brecciation horizons associated with veins and microcracks. Depending on the intensity of fragmentation and the clast/matrix ratio, the rocks are referred to as brecciated basalt or basaltic breccia. A typically observed feature is the jigsaw-puzzle structure, suggesting possible in situ fragmentation. Macro- and microscopic observations show that the breccia-clasts consist mainly of sparsely to moderately plagioclase pyric basalts that were hydrothermally altered to variable degrees. Thus, formation of such breccias likely involved fluid-assisted fracturing of basalt. In contrast, Subunit VIB is characterized by a progressive decrease of breccia horizons and the development of different vein types, almost always polymineralic. Notably, vein composition and their orientation changes through Subunit VIB. Although numerous small-scale veins often related with major veins were observed, three first-order vein types were categorized: (1) composite silica-rich veins, (2) composite epidote-rich veins, and (3) composite carbonate- and/or silica-rich veins.

## Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples from Hole U1502A and selected samples from Hole U1502B were analyzed for calcareous nannofossils, foraminifers, diatoms, and ostracods. Additional samples were taken from the working-half core intervals when necessary to refine the ages. The preservation of calcareous microfossils is mostly good to moderate in the upper sections (Cores 368-U1502A-2R through 13R) and moderate to poor in the lower sections (Cores 14R through 41R). Planktonic foraminifers and calcareous nannofossils are abundant to common in Cores 2R through 10R, 25R, and 37R through 39R and rare to barren in all other sections. Diatoms were only observed in Sections 40R-1 through 40R-3. In Hole U1502B, foraminifers were observed only in Section 3R-1 and are represented by well-preserved agglutinated deep-water taxa. Ostracods are extremely rare; single occurrences were observed only in three samples in Hole U1502A (Samples 3R-CC, 4R-CC, and 5R-CC).

Fourteen planktonic foraminifer and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphic events were used to provide an age-depth model for Site U1502 from the late Oligocene to the late Miocene. The Pliocene/Miocene boundary is placed tentatively in Core 368-U1502A-2R, but it may be shallower than the cored section. The Miocene/Oligocene boundary was determined to lie between Samples 39R-CC and 40R-1, 7 cm. Sedimentation rates vary from ~10 mm/ky in the early-middle Miocene to ~39 mm/ky in the late Miocene. No planktonic microfossils were found in Hole U1502B, but a sample from the sandy interval in Core 3R revealed abundant and diverse abyssal agglutinated benthic foraminifers. The composition of this agglutinated benthic foraminifer assemblage provides a possible age of late Eocene for this interval.

Figure F20. Magnetization intensity vs. inclination showing the effect of the steep drilling overprint, Holes U1502A and U1502B. Basalts have higher magnetization intensity than sediments. Green lines represent the expected normal and reversal inclination at present latitudes.

<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>

## Paleomagnetism

The magnetic behavior of sediments at Site U1502 correlates with their color (greenish gray or reddish brown). Reddish brown sediment shows AF magnetization indicative of magnetite or titanomagnetite and hematite (responsible for the color). In contrast, greenish gray sediment hosts magnetite or titanomagnetite and pyrrhotite. The predominance of steep normal inclinations (~75°; Figure F20) across all late Oligocene to late Miocene units (375.00–750.67 m) affects the SRM section measurements and prevents any reliable magnetostratigraphy to be established for Holes U1502A and U1502B.

The basalt has NRM intensity one order of magnitude higher than sediment. The main magnetically remanent phase is titanomagnetite, but its alteration produces maghemite or hematite. Magnetic susceptibility (κ) has a bimodal distribution with a median at 327 × 10⁻⁶ SI. κ does not show any strong correlation with any chemical (R² = 0.343 for Fe₂O₃ wt%). Intervals of high κ might correspond to the bottoms of flows with a massive, less altered structure. Altered basalts have higher Koenigsberger ratios (Qn = 1–10) than fresher basalts (Qn = 0.001–1). The mean dip of magnetic foliation is 8°.

Cores 368-U1502B-9R and 10R show less-pervasive drilling overprint, and two discrete samples show both a normal (soft) component and a reverse (hard) component, suggesting a possible reversal.

## Geochemistry

Site U1502 contains very low high-hydrocarbon gas abundances and TOC, nitrogen, and sulfur contents, likely reflecting the poor preservation of organic matter. Instances of high carbonate content are associated with siderite, and on occasion this mineral comprises >50 wt% by mass of intervals in lithostratigraphic Subunit ID. The interstitial water at Site U1502 is enriched in Ca, Mg, and K and has notably high alkalinity but is depleted in Na, Cl, and Br. The linear
<figure><img src="image_29.png" /><figcaption>Figure F21. Physical property records, Site U1502.</figcaption></figure>

increase of major anion and cation contents implies upward movement of fluid from deeper sediments. The hemipelagic sediments in Unit I have some similarities to the geochemical characteristics of the hemipelagic and pelagic units at Sites U1501 and U1505, but Site U1502 sediments are enriched in Fe, K, and clay concentrations, likely as a result of regions of increased alteration. All of the analyzed igneous rocks from Units II–VI are heavily altered, although samples from igneous lithologic Subunit 2b are altered to a lesser degree than those from Subunit 2a.

## Physical properties

Physical property data acquired at Site U1502 include density, magnetic susceptibility, P-wave velocity, NGR, color reflectance, and thermal conductivity (Figure F21). These data allow us to characterize four physical property (PP) units. PP Unit 1 (375–740 m) corresponds to the nannofossil-rich and biosiliceous-rich clay lithologies and exhibits small variations in NGR between 50 and 70 counts/s and uniformly increasing P-wave velocity with depth that averages <2500 m/s. Unit 1 sediments have similar porosity to those recorded at nearby Sites U1499 and U1500 in the same depth interval, suggesting the same compaction history. A significant increase in bulk density (up to 2.7 g/cm³) in Core 368-U1502B-3R is associated with strongly lithified limestone beds. Variations of high and low magnetic susceptibility values correspond to sediment color

changes in Unit 1 and may be controlled by the amount of pyrrhotite in the sediments.

PP Unit 2 (740–750 m) in Hole U1502A is characterized by lower P-wave velocity and bulk density and higher NGR than the strata above. Low density and P-wave velocity found in Unit 2 reflect the clast-rich claystone from lithostratigraphic Unit V.

PP Units 3 and 4 represent the basaltic basement and are characterized by relatively low NGR (<10 counts/s), high density, and P-wave velocity that vary over a broad range (3000–6000 m/s). The boundary between Units 3 and 4 is marked by an abrupt increase in density, P-wave velocity, and thermal conductivity and coincides with the change from igneous lithologic Subunit 2a to 2b. Prominent magnetic susceptibility peaks (up to 4000 × 10⁻⁵ SI) in Units 3 and 4 correspond to relatively less altered basalt. Thermal conductivity in Units 3 and 4 are variable but generally increases in line with decreasing porosity with depth.

## Downhole measurements

Wireline logging was conducted in Hole U1502B using a modified triple combo tool string and the VSI tool string. The modified triple combo tool string included the HNGS, HLDS, and Dipole Sonic Imager (DSI) for acoustic velocity. The triple combo run collected good data downhole from 875.3 m (~45 m above the bottom of Hole U1502B) and allowed us to define eight logging units, which
correlate in great part to the lithostratigraphic units and core physi-
cal properties. Logging Units 1–5 are defined by data collected
through the casing and drill pipe. Unit 6 data was collected outside
the casing but inside the drill pipe, whereas data in Units 7 and 8
were collected in the open hole. For measurements inside the casing
and/or drill pipe, only NGR and the associated K, Th, and U compo-
nents provide meaningful data, although they are highly attenuated
by the casing and/or drill pipe. Open borehole conditions from the
bottom of the casing at 723 m to 875.3 m were generally good, with
measured diameters from 12 to 14.5 inches. Log and core data gen-
erally show good agreement, and downhole measurements provide
information in zones of poor core recovery in Hole U1502B. The log
data exhibit increasing density and P-wave velocity with depth. The
amplitude of NGR increases gradually with depth throughout Units
1–3 (seafloor to ~630 m), with an interval of relatively constant val-
ues between 150 and 350 m. NGR values are lowest in Units 4–8
(~630–850 m).

The VSI tool string was run only inside the casing because the
tool could not pass through an obstruction encountered at the end
of the casing. Eight stations were attempted. The two deepest sta-
tions (at 715.1 and 695.2 m) are associated with large noise levels,
which were possibly caused by poor mechanical coupling of the cas-
ing with the surrounding formation. The remaining upper six sta-
tions, located at 290.2, 350.3, 450.3, 550.1, 590.3, and 630.3 m,
recorded good quality waveforms.

Site U1503

**Background and objectives**

Site U1503 (proposed Site SCSIII-9B; Sun et al., 2016b) is located at 3868 mbsl near the top of the structural high named Ridge C (Figures F3, F22). Ridge C is the most seaward ridge of the three margin-parallel Ridges A, B, and C that characterize the lower continental slope underlain by thin (5-7 km) crust. Ridge C is believed to represent at least partly, if not fully, igneous crust and

hence the completion of continental breakup along this margin seg-
ment of the northern SCS.

A key operational objective of Site U1503 was to sample the low-
ermost ~300 m of sediments on top of basement to constrain the
age and subsidence history of the crust at this location, the timing of
normal faulting, and the environment of the early half-graben fill.
The most important goal was to sample the igneous stratigraphy to
at least 100 m below the basement. Because of a rig floor equipment
failure (drawworks), we abandoned the site after installing casing in
Hole U1503A to 991.5 m.

Deep, representative sampling of the basaltic material at this site
would have provided an important reference frame for breakup
modeling. With an estimated 1640 m sediment thickness overlying
basement, obtaining basement samples and log data at this site rep-
resented a challenging operation.

**Operations**

To reach our objectives, we conducted operations in one hole
(U1503A; 18°08.6300′N, 116°18.8456′E; 3868 mbsl) (Table T2). We
successfully installed a reentry system and 991.5 m of 10¾ inch cas-
ing in Hole U1503A. However, we were unable to deepen the hole
below the casing because of repeated breakdowns of the low clutch
diaphragm in the drawworks and concerns that we did not have
enough spares to last the remainder of the expedition. Without the
drawworks' low clutch, we could not conduct drilling operations
deeper than 3400 m (water depth plus penetration depth). Because
Site U1503 had a planned depth of 5695 m (water depth plus pen-
tration depth), we abandoned Hole U1503A without addressing any
scientific objectives. Hole U1503A remains cased and open for pos-
sible future occupation.

Site U1504

**Background and objectives**

Site U1504 (alternate Site SCSIII-27A) was proposed during Ex-
pedition 367 and approved by the Environmental Protection and
Safety Panel during Expedition 368 as an alternate site should there
be time left following completion of the high-priority sites included
in the *Scientific Prospectus* (Sun et al., 2016b). Expedition 368 occu-
pied Site U1504 because of the inability to continue drilling below
the 990 m deep, cased Hole U1503A. Most of our remaining ap-
proved sites were in water deeper than 3400 m and/or required
deep penetration. One exception was Site U1504, which is located
at 2823 mbsl ~45 km east of Site U1501 on the OMH and has a shal-
low coring target (Figures F3, F23) and targets the nature of base-
ment within the COT.

**Operations**

Two holes were drilled at Site U1504 (Table T2). In Hole
U1504A (18°50.9199′N, 116°14.5397′E; 2816.6 mbsl), we cored with
the RCB system from the seafloor to metamorphic basement at
134.8 m and then into basement to 165.5 m, recovering 52.77 m
(32%). In Hole U1504B (~200 m southeast of Hole U1504A;
18°50.8213′N, 116°14.5978′E; 2843.0 mbsl), we drilled without re-
covery to 88.2 m, cored with the RCB system to metamorphic base-
ment at 107.9 m, and then cored into basement to 200 m, recovering
21.48 m (19%).

**Lithostratigraphy**

The succession recovered at Site U1504 includes two sedimen-
tary units (I and II) underlain by a metamorphic unit (III). Litho-
stratigraphic Unit I (early Miocene–Pleistocene) is dominated by

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /><figcaption>Figure F22. Bathymetry at Site U1503 and location of the site in relation to seismic Lines 15ecLW5 and 08ec1555.</figcaption></figure>
Figure F23. Bathymetry at Site U1504 and location of the site in relation to seismic lines. Note that the clear offset in the bathymetry along the margin may indicate some transform offset in the deeper margin structure.

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /></figure>

nannofossil and foraminiferal ooze and minor nannofossil-rich clay and is divided into four subunits (IA–ID). Subunit IA (Hole U1504A = 17.50–46.59 m) is composed of nannofossil-rich clay, nannofossil ooze, nannofossil ooze with biogenic silica, and clay-rich nannofossil ooze. The color of the ooze gradually changes downhole from dark greenish gray to greenish gray and gray. Distinct intervals contain more silt. Thin silt laminations are often disrupted by bioturbation. Layering is contorted at the base of the subunit. Subunit IB (Hole U1504A = 46.59–59.73 m) is composed of light brown foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze and pale brown nannofossil ooze with foraminifers. Subunit IC (Hole U1504A = 65.80–104.99 m) is composed of light greenish gray, greenish gray, light brownish gray, pale brown, and light gray nannofossil ooze with clay and greenish gray clay-rich nannofossil ooze intercalated with light gray nannofossil-rich foraminiferal ooze with clay, light brownish gray foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze, and foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze with clay. Subunit ID (Hole U1504A = 104.99–112.66 m; Hole U1504B = 88.20–92.31 m) is composed of light brown to yellowish brown nannofossil ooze with foraminifers intercalated with pink or brownish yellow foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze. Unit II (possibly Eocene; Hole U1504A = 114.72–134.80 m; Hole U1504B = 97.90–107.91 m) is clast-supported, bioclast-rich limestone with larger benthic foraminifers (as large as 15 mm). Unit III (age unknown; Hole U1504A = 136.40–163.70 m; Hole U1504B = 117.40–196.28 m) is composed of fine- to coarse-grained epidote-chlorite schist (Subunit IIIA) and calc-silicate schist (Subunit IIIB) with granofels clasts.

## Metamorphic petrology

We recovered 27 m (Hole U1504A) and 79 m (Hole U1504B) of a variety of mylonitic epidote-chlorite to calc-silicate schists containing granofels clasts. Recovery was <20% in metamorphic lithologic Unit 1. Lithologic changes with depth and between the two holes were observed, and Unit 1 is divided based on a change in the

predominant metamorphic lithology (Figure F24). Metamorphic lithologic Subunit 1a was recovered in both Holes U1504A and U1504B and consists of greenish gray, microcrystalline to coarse-grained epidote-chlorite schist with dark greenish gray granofels clasts (<10 cm) and epidote-chlorite breccia. The schists show a strong mylonitic foliation, whereas the clasts have generally isotropic textures showing local weakly developed foliation. Both the schist and the granofels clasts show, in general, a comparable mineral assemblage consisting of epidote, chlorite, feldspar, and quartz ± other phyllosilicates and accessory minerals and locally isolated subhedral dark minerals (pyroxene?). The granofels clasts are often crosscut by a network of quartz veins. Subunit 1b contains an alternation of calc-silicate schist and epidote-chlorite schist with granofels clasts, epidote and/or chlorite granofels, chlorite schist with epidote, epidote-chlorite gneiss, and minor marble. The lithologies are fine grained to coarse grained with mostly an inequigranular texture and some bimodal or equigranular textures, and the schistose sections show a strong mylonitic foliation. Several of the schists show reddish brown alteration, and late calcite veins crosscut the foliation of the deepest schists recovered (e.g., in Core 368-U1504A-20R). Minerals observed are epidote, quartz, chlorite, calcite, and feldspar. Subunit 1b contains numerous clasts with variable lithologies: cryptocrystalline granofels either with or without quartz and/or calcite veins, porphyritic rocks with tabular phenocrysts (possibly altered plagioclase), brecciated (epidote, calcite, and/or quartz) veins, and foliated granofels.

Handheld pXRF analyses show an average mafic igneous composition for both the schist and the clasts but with a spread toward ultramafic (in Hole U1504B Subunit 1a) and more felsic compositions (in Subunit 1b). A clear change in sulfur contents occurs between Subunits 1a and 1b, the latter of which is below the detection limit. High Nb contents compared to MORB indicate a potentially enriched source for the protolith.

Lithostratigraphic Unit III (metamorphic lithologic Unit 1) consists of mylonitic greenschist facies metamorphic rocks, as indicated by the presence of epidote and chlorite. We infer that the protolith most likely was breccia based on the different clast sizes and types and styles of deformation. The protolith likely had a mafic igneous composition. It is, however, unclear if this breccia with mafic clasts has a sedimentary origin (e.g., volcaniclastic) or represents a potentially hydrothermally altered form of basalt, gabbro, or ultramafic protolith. At present, the metamorphic evolution of this unit and its possible connection with the opening of the SCS is unknown.

## Structural geology

Lithostratigraphic Unit I shows subhorizontal bedding and locally some minor possible slump folds, as observed in Section 368-U1504A-5R-1. Unit II is devoid of any deformation structures. The metamorphic basement at Site U1504 is formed by greenschist facies mylonitic epidote-chlorite schists and calc-silicate schists (Unit III). The rocks preserve distinct deformation structures resulting from changes in the mode of deformation (brittle/ductile); the modal amount of quartz + feldspar governing the (local) rheological behavior; the amount of accumulated strain; the occurrence of variably sized (up to decimeter scale), prekinematic, heterolithic clasts that mostly form rigid (i.e., internally undeformed) bodies in the ductile foliation; and/or superimposed multiple deformation phases. The steeply dipping (up to 75°) mylonitic foliation is characterized by distinct morphologies: (1) a widely spaced anastomosing foliation associated with leucocratic bands; (2) a tight, closely
Figure F24. Lithostratigraphic, petrographic/petrological, and structural observations with strong focus on the metamorphic basement, Site U1504. A, B. Clast-supported limestone with large benthic foraminifers and coral fragments. C. Severely quartz-veined, angular clast of chlorite-epidote granofels enclosed in mylonitic foliation of a typical epidote-chlorite schist. D. Steep (~75°) widely anastomosing foliation in a quartz + feldspar-rich variety of the rock. Arrow = extensively stretched veined clast of chlorite-epidote granofels oriented parallel to the foliation. E. Epidote-chlorite schist with granofels clasts split parallel to the x, y-plane of finite strain. Large granofels clast is crosscut by a shear band in the epidote-chlorite schist. Several sigma clasts lie right above the shear band. Both deformation structures indicate normal sense of shear. A late, postkinematic vein crosscuts both the mylonitic foliation and the granofels clast. F. Tight foliation affected by crenulation cleavage in quartz-poor (i.e., more melanocratic) variety of the rock. G. Local occurrence of foliated impure calcite marble. H. Veined and altered aphyric mafic granofels clast (left side) and granofels clast interpreted as protolithic epidote vein (right side). Both clasts are internally undeformed but show synkinematic deformation together with the mylonitic fabric at their rims. I. Rigid (left) and strongly deformed (upper end) granofels clasts embedded in calc-silicate schist. Note the deflection of the mylonitic foliation at the clast boundaries. J. Long piece of core showing the characteristic morphology of the mylonitic foliation in calc-silicate schist of Subunit IIIB. Note the steep inclination and anastomosing geometry enclosing heterolithic clasts that are strongly elongated, folded, and oriented parallel to the foliation.

<figure><img src="image_32.png" /></figure>
spaced, and often crenulated foliation associated with more melano-
cratic schist variations; and (3) a tight anastomosing foliation as-
sociated with calc-silicate schists enclosing angular to rounded
heterolithic granofels clasts. Locally, the sense of shear is indicated
by shear bands and sigma clasts. In metamorphic lithologic Subunit
1a (Figure F24), granofels clasts are consistently microcrystalline
(chlorite + epidote) and dismembered by a network of mostly paral-
lel and perpendicular quartz veins cutting each other. They often
form apparently stretched, elongated bodies oriented parallel to the
foliation. Subunit 1b shows a wide range of prekinematic (mostly
mafic) clasts enclosed by the foliation. Encountered varieties en-
compass highly phyric to aphyric rocks, as well as fragmented for-
mer (epidote/calcite/quartz) vein fillings. In some cases, such clasts
show ductile internal deformation. Clast boundaries can be either
distinctly sharp or diffuse, the latter indicating mechanical and/or
chemical interactions with the surrounding foliation. Deformation
in Subunit 1b is presumably strongly controlled by an inherited
(protolithic) brecciated structure.

Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples at Site U1504 were analyzed for calcar-
eous nannofossils, foraminifers, and diatoms. Additional samples
were taken from intervals in the working-half core sections when
necessary to refine the ages. Preservation of calcareous microfossils
is good to very good in Cores 368-U1504A-2R through 12R, and
368-U1504B-2R and is poorly preserved (recrystallization) in the
reefal limestone below Core 368-U1504A-12R. Planktonic foramin-
ifers and calcareous nannofossils are abundant in Cores 368-
U1504A-2R through 12R and 368-U1504B-2R and barren in Cores
368-U1504A-13R through 15R. Diatoms are present but poorly pre-
served in Cores 368-U1504A-2R through 5R and absent in rest of
the samples. Twenty biostratigraphic datums were identified in a
succession from the late Pleistocene to the early Miocene.

A possible hiatus between the early Pleistocene and late Mi-
cene was determined in Core 368-U1504A-6R by abrupt planktonic
foraminifer and nannofossil assemblage changes. Sedimentation
rates at this site varied from ~6 mm/ky in the early middle Miocene
to ~22 mm/ky during the Pleistocene.

Cores 368-U1504A-13R through 15R are mainly composed of reefal and larger benthic foraminiferal limestone. Thin section examination of these carbonate rocks indicates the presence of abundant *Nummulites*, suggesting an Eocene age. The abundant larger benthic foraminifers indicate deposition in a warm shallow-marine environment. In contrast, the abundant planktonic foraminifers and calcareous nannofossils in the carbonate ooze in the overlying sedimentary section (Cores 2R through 12R) indicate a deep-water environment since the early Miocene.

Paleomagnetism

Most of the discrete sediment samples analyzed show an initial
soft magnetic behavior attributed to titanomagnetite followed by a
gyroremanent magnetization (GRM) greater than 70 mT attributed
to greigite, a mineral already identified in Hole U1501C. Consis-
tently steep normal inclinations (~60°) across all sedimentary units
indicate a significant drilling overprint that is removed by AF de-
magnetization up to 15 mT. A succession of nine normal and eight
reversed polarities are defined, particularly in the upper part of the
cores.

Discrete samples show low κ values, a moderate degree of mag-
netic anisotropy, and strongly oblate symmetry, probably of depo-
sitional origin. This subhorizontal planar fabric indicates deposition
in a calm, pelagic environment with moderate traction.

NRM intensities of metamorphic rocks, measured on the SRM and on four discrete cubes, are relatively weak and indicate a complex magnetic assemblage composed of magnetite and hematite. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) fabrics consistently dip steeply and show a moderate to high degree of magnetic anisotropy, oblate symmetries, and oblique magnetic lineations, possibly indicating an oblique motion in this high-strain shear zone.

Geochemistry

Hydrocarbon gases were not detected above background levels at Site U1504, and TOC, TN, and TS contents were low (<0.5 wt%). Instances of high carbonate content were associated with bioclastic-rich and clast-supported limestone. The upper part of the sediment was not cored. Interstitial water data from the cored sediments are broadly comparable to other sites.

Physical properties

Four physical properties (PP) units are identified at Site U1504 according to variations in the core physical properties. Core material in PP Units 1 and 2 consists of soft sediments. In general, with respect to Unit 2, Unit 1 has a higher average NGR (~30 versus 20 counts/s), a weaker color reflectance (mean L° of ~40 versus 50), and a lower average red, green, blue (RGB) value (100 versus 150). These changes in physical properties between Units 1 and 2 correspond to a switch in sediment composition from nannofossil-rich clay to nannofossil ooze. A general increase in bulk (from ~1.4 to 1.8 g/cm³) and dry (from ~0.7 to 1.2 g/cm³) densities and a downhole decrease in porosity (from 75% to 56%) in Units 1 and 2 mainly indicate sediment compaction with time. The boundary between Units 1 and 2 is marked by a relatively rapid increase in P-wave velocity and bulk density and a rapid decrease in porosity compared with the general trends mentioned above. This physical property boundary corresponds to an unconformity in the seismic profile and to a hiatus confirmed by the biostratigraphic data.

P-wave velocity and bulk density increase from ~3800 to 5000 m/s and from ~2.4 to 2.9 g/cm³, respectively, in Unit 3, which corresponds to a transition in lithology from coral-rich limestone to clast-supported limestone. Coral-rich limestone in the upper portion of Unit 3 is also associated with a moderately high porosity of ~23%. Unit 4 is characterized by uniformly high velocity of ~5500 m/s, high bulk density of ~2.9 g/cm³, and low porosity of ~3%, which correspond to the epidote-chlorite schist. A large increase in both velocity and density at the Unit 2/3 and Unit 3/4 boundaries corresponds to strong reflectors in the seismic data. The gradual downhole increase in thermal conductivity values at shallow depths is likely due to progressive compaction of the sediments.

Site U1505

Background and objectives

Site U1505 (proposed Site SCSIII-3D) is located at 2916.6 m wa-
ter depth on a broad regional basement high (Figure F25). This site
was an alternate to Site U1501, should time be left for drilling fol-
lowing completion of the high-priority sites included in the *Scien-
tific Prospectus* (Sun et al., 2016b). Site U1505 was included in
Expedition 368 because it might complement findings at Site
U1501, and it was in the operational limits of the 3400 m drill string
imposed by the failure of the drawworks.

Both Sites U1505 and U1501 are located on the same structural
high at similar water depths and are 10.5 km apart (Figure F2). The
seismic section at Site U1505 generally shows a more horizontal ori-
entation of the seismic reflectors and concordant relationship of the
strata than the one at Site U1501, indicating the sediment sequence
<figure><img src="image_33.png" /><figcaption>Figure F25. Bathymetry at Site U1505 and location of the site in relation to seismic Lines 04ec1555 and 15eclW1. Note that the site is not at the exact crossing of Lines 04ec1555 and 15eclW1.</figcaption></figure>

at Site U1505 should be more complete. The key objective at Site U1505 was to sample the stratigraphic record above seismic Unconformity T80 (inferred before drilling to be ~38 Ma), and specific goals were to constrain both (1) the sediment responses to the tectonic events and basin evolution since the Eocene and (2) Neogene paleoceanographic and paleoclimatological changes along the northern SCS margin.

The relatively shallow 2916.6 m water depth at Site U1505 makes it one of the few ODP/Integrated Ocean Drilling Program/IODP sites above the modern CCD of the SCS. The site's hemipelagic deposits, rich in calcareous microfossils, enable the application of stable isotopes, faunal analyses, and other multidisciplinary methods. Key objectives were to reconstruct the east Asian monsoonal climate record in the SCS and upper- and deep-water variations in the western Pacific. Site U1505 will, for the first time, provide an almost continuous sequence of paleoceanographic studies at orbital and millennial timescales since the late Eocene in the SCS. We cored two deep holes at this site with the APC/XCB system to obtain a continuous record of the Pliocene–Pleistocene interval for high-resolution paleoceanographic studies.

## Operations

Four holes were cored with the APC and XCB systems at Site U1505 (Table T2). In Hole U1505A (18°55.0560′N, 115°51.5369′E; 2916.6 m water depth), Core 1H misfired and recovered only 0.3 m. In Hole U1505B (18°55.0562′N, 115°51.5370′E; 2918.6 m water depth), a 3.23 m long mudline core was recovered for future education and outreach activities. Hole U1505C (18°55.0570′N, 115°51.5370′E; 2917.4 m water depth) was cored with the APC system to 317 m and then cored with the XCB system to 480.2 m, recovering 480.15 m (100%). Hole U1505D (18°55.0485′N, 115°51.5501′E; 2917.5 m water depth) was cored with the APC system to 184.5 m and recovered 191.43 m (104%). Downhole logging with a modified triple combo tool string was conducted in Hole

U1505C from 341.2 m uphole. The maximum drilling depth of 480.2 m was determined by the possible maximum total length (3400 m) of drill string deployment.

## Lithostratigraphy

The sediment succession recovered at Site U1505 extends from the Oligocene to the Pleistocene. Two sedimentary units (I and II) were observed (Figure F26). Lithostratigraphic Unit I is dominated by nannofossil ooze with varying amounts of foraminifers and clay, as well as biogenic silica in the upper interval of the hole. Unit I is divided into three subunits (IA–IC). Subunit IA (Hole U1505C = 0.00–27.76 m) is composed of dark greenish gray and greenish gray biosiliceous-rich clay with nannofossils, nannofossil-rich clay with biogenic silica, and nannofossil-rich biosiliceous ooze with clay. The abundance of biogenic silica decreases downhole. A pinkish gray, ~6 cm thick, slightly fining upward ash layer occurs at 20.8 m (Hole U1505C), and ash pods were observed at 20.3 m in Hole U1505D. Subunit IB (Hole U1505C = 27.76–273.39 m) is composed of gray to brown nannofossil ooze with minor silty intervals. The color change reflects the varying abundance of foraminifers and clay. Subunit IC (Hole U1505C = 273.39–403.79 m) is composed of gray, greenish gray, and light brownish gray clay-rich nannofossil ooze (with foraminifers) and foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze with clay and minor amounts of nannofossil-rich clay. Unit II (Hole U1505C = 403.50–480.54 m) is dominated by dark greenish gray, well-consolidated silty clay and clayey silt (with nannofossils).

## Biostratigraphy

All core catcher samples from Holes U1505A–U1505C were analyzed for calcareous nannofossils, planktonic foraminifers, and diatoms. Additional samples were taken from intervals in the working-half sections when necessary to refine the ages. Hole U1505D was not sampled continuously for biostratigraphic analyses because of time constraints at the end of the expedition, but the sequence recovered spans from the late Miocene to the present (Figure F26). Preservation of calcareous microfossils is good in Cores 368-U1505C-1H through 48X and moderate to poor in Cores 49X through 64X. Planktonic foraminifers are abundant or common in Cores 1H through 56X and 59X through 62X and rare in Cores 57X, 58X, 63X, and 64X. Calcareous nannofossils are generally abundant to common in most samples from Hole U1505C, except for those from the upper part of Core 57X.

Forty-five biostratigraphic datums identified in Hole U1505C suggest a continuous succession from the early Oligocene to the Holocene (Figure F26). The Pleistocene/Pliocene boundary is placed in Core 7H, the Pliocene/Miocene boundary is placed between Cores 11H and 13H, and the Miocene/Oligocene boundary is placed between Cores 54X and 55X. Sedimentation rates are ~7 mm/ky in the Oligocene, ~15 mm/ky during the Miocene–Pliocene, and ~24 mm/ky during the Pleistocene.

Relatively low abundances of planktonic foraminifers deeper than Core 57X indicate bathyal depths during the early Oligocene, whereas much higher abundances of planktonic foraminifers shallower than Core 56X suggest a deeper water environment since the late Oligocene.

## Paleomagnetism

Only NRM was measured with the SRM in Hole U1505C, except for Sections 1H-1 through 3H-1, which were in-line AF demagnetized in three steps. Most of the 55 AF demagnetized discrete samples show very soft magnetic behavior responsible for the acquisition of a strong, vertical drilling overprint (average inclina-
<figure><img src="image_34.png" /><figcaption>Figure F26. Lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic summary, Site U1505.</figcaption></figure>

tion = ~81°) that was removed by demagnetization to 10–15 mT. This soft behavior shows that magnetic remanence is dominated by multidomain to pseudosingle-domain titanomagnetite or magnetite. The drilling overprint appears to impact discrete samples far less than core sections (Figure F27). The lower part of the hole (Cores 48X through 64X) is characterized by severe drilling disturbance, which causes a large scatter of NRM directions and inclinations.

Magnetostratigraphic data are based on polarities assigned to the archive-half sections and corroborated by directions obtained from oriented discrete samples. The lower boundary of the Brunhes (C1n) normal chron is at 37.4 m (0.781 Ma). The lower boundary (57.4 m) of the reverse polarity r1 is the base of Subchron C1r.3r with an age of 1.778 Ma.
Figure F27. Magnetic measurements, Hole U1505C. Inclination was used to determine polarity. AFD = AF demagnetization. Magnetostratigraphic features are referred to as n1, etc., in a sequential manner for convenience and have no bearing on chrons. Data from discrete samples are shown as yellow squares and green circles. GPTS2016 = geomagnetic polarity timescale of Ogg et al. (2016).

<figure><img src="image_35.png" /></figure>

## Geochemistry

Low but measurable hydrocarbon gases were detected only in Cores 368-U1505C-53X through 60X (371–438 m). The base of the hole has methane distributions similar to those at Site U1499, whereas the uppermost section is barren of methane, similar to Site U1501. Except for the shallowest 30 m of sediment, TOC, TN, and TS contents are mostly low in lithostratigraphic Unit I, but TS and TOC are slightly higher in Unit II; however, in all cases they are typically <1 wt% (Figure F28). Interstitial water chemistry has two important features. The upper part of the hole exhibits patterns similar to those at Site U1501; inhibited sulfate reduction and low chlorine, bromine, and salinity suggest the presence of freshwater at depth. Freshwater at >400 m coincides with the presence of low quantities of methane and the T60 regional seismic unconformity.

## Physical properties and downhole measurements

Physical property data were acquired from cores from Holes U1505C (0–480.5 m) and U1505D (0–184 m), including density, magnetic susceptibility, P-wave velocity, NGR, color reflectance,

and thermal conductivity. Physical property trends allow us to define two physical property units, PP Units 1 (0–403 m) and 2 (403–480 m). The boundary between Units 1 and 2 displays a distinct color change from greenish and light brownish gray to dark greenish gray. This boundary, which corresponds to the seismic stratigraphic T60 unconformity, is associated with a sharp change in physical properties. In Unit 1, sediments in the upper part are composed of foraminifer-rich nannofossil ooze with clay that gradually changes to clay-rich nannofossil ooze in the lower part. This change is well reflected in the NGR, which increases with depth. The higher NGR in Unit 2 is related to sediment that primarily consists of silty clay. Magnetic susceptibility overall gradually decreases with depth. The boundary between Units 1 and 2 shows that density and P-wave velocity drops sharply from ~2.2 to ~1.8 g/cm³ and from ~2250 to 1750 m/s, respectively. Porosity abruptly increases from ~35% to ~50%. Thermal conductivity also shows a sharp change at the boundary. Reflectance parameter L* and RGB data are well correlated with carbonate content.