# Recent Advances on Visible Light Metal-Based Photocatalysts for Polymerization under Low Light Intensity

Frederic Dumur

► To cite this version:

Frederic Dumur. Recent Advances on Visible Light Metal-Based Photocatalysts for Polymerization under Low Light Intensity. Catalysts, 2019, 9 (9), pp.736. 10.3390/catal9090736. hal-02491572

HAL Id: hal-02491572

https://hal.science/hal-02491572

Submitted on 8 Jul 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Recent Advances on Visible Light Metal-Based
Photocatalysts for Polymerization under Low
Light Intensity

Frédéric Dumur

Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Institut de Chimie Radiculaire ICR, UMR 7273, F-13397 Marseille, France;
frederic.dumur@univ-amu.fr; Tel.: +33-(0)4-91-28-90-59

Received: 12 August 2019; Accepted: 28 August 2019; Published: 30 August 2019

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Abstract:** In recent years, polymerization processes activated by light have attracted a great deal of interest due to the wide range of applications in which this polymerization technique is involved. Parallel to the traditional industrial applications ranging from inks, adhesives, and coatings, the development of high-tech applications such as nanotechnology and 3D-printing have given a revival of interest to this polymerization technique known for decades. To initiate a photochemical polymerization, the key element is the molecule capable to interact with light, i.e., the photoinitiator and more generally the photoinitiating system, as a combination of several components is often required to create the reactive species responsible for the polymerization process. With the aim of reducing the photoinitiator content while optimizing the polymerization yield and/or the polymerization speed, photocatalytic systems have been developed, enabling the photosensitizer to be regenerated during the polymerization process. In this review, an overview of the photocatalytic systems developed for polymerizations carried out under a low light intensity and visible light is provided. Over the years, a wide range of organometallic photocatalysts has been proposed, addressing both the polymerization efficiency and/or the toxicity, as well as environmental issues.

**Keywords:** photocatalysts; metal complexes; chromophores; photosensitizer; photopolymerization; photoinitiation; photoresists; photoredox catalysis

## 1. Introduction

Photochemical reactions are chemical reactions occurring when a light-sensitive material present in a reaction mixture is excited by light. As the first manifestation of this photoexcitation, significant changes of its electronic states occur, enabling an electron from the ground state to be transferred in the excited state, inducing consecutive reactions. Depending on the energy of the absorbed photons, a cleavage of a chemical bond or the production of radicals can occur [1–4]. In an effort to drastically reduce the use or the generation of hazardous substances during chemical reactions, photo-assisted chemistry, and thus photochemistry, has been identified as an environmentally friendly synthetic method which is now commonly used in organic chemistry [5]. Indeed, numerous photochemical reactions can be carried out without taking recourse to acids, bases, transition metals, or catalysts, so that the formation of side products is drastically limited. Compared to the classical organic chemistry, reactivity of photoexcited compounds significantly differs from that of the ground state so that the formation of products that could not be obtained using conventional synthetic methods is possible. In fact, photochemistry does not compete with classical organic chemistry but offers additional synthetic routes to chemists. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the development of visible-light photochemical reactions, as well as the availability of cheap, compact, and low-consumption irradiation setups, has renewed the interest in photoinduced reactions [6–10] and discarded the classical UV-based
photochemistry requiring bulky and expensive irradiation setups. Parallel to this, the use of UV light additionally raised safety concerns connected with the dangers of the UV radiations so that alternatives are actively researched [11–13]. Recently, a major breakthrough has been achieved with the emergence of visible light photoredox catalysis. It notably allowed to drastically reduce the content of the light-sensitive material by the possibility to regenerate it during the chemical reactions [14–16]. The concept of visible light photoredox catalysis has been separately developed by David MacMillan, Tehshik Yoon, and Corey Stephenson in late 2008 and early 2009. Using this approach, numerous synthetic problems in organic chemistry could be solved while addressing the energy consumption and safety issues [17]. Rapidly, these concepts of visible light photoredox catalysis have been transposed to the synthesis of macromolecules, historically based on UV processes [18,19]. Photopolymerization constitutes an effective and easy way to prepare polymers by transforming a liquid monomer or a liquid resin into a highly crosslinked solid polymer. From a theoretical point of view, photopolymerization is an appealing polymerization technique which exhibits numerous advantages compared to the solution-phase polymerization. Notably, photopolymerization can be carried out without any solvent and at room temperature so that no or lower amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOC) are released. A spatial [20] and temporal [21] control can also be obtained (see Figure 1). High polymerization rates and high final conversion values can also be reached. When photopolymerization is carried out under visible light, an improved curing depth resulting from a better light penetration inside the resin can be obtained, and safe irradiation conditions can be used [22].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Advantages of photopolymerization. (A) Fast monomer conversion vs. time. (B) Spatial control of the polymerization by use of a mask. Reprinted with permission of Poelma et al. [20]. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (C) Monomer conversion vs. time by switching on/off the light. No monomer conversion occurs when the light is off. Reproduced with permission from [21]. Copyright The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.</figcaption></figure>

In 2010, an important milestone was established for photopolymerization, with the first example of visible light photoredox catalysis applied to polymer synthesis [23]. Following this pioneering work, numerous visible light photoredox catalysts have been specifically designed for the purpose of photopolymerization. More precisely, a great deal of effort has been devoted to develop photoredox catalysts capable of initiating a polymerization under low light intensity and under air. These constitute difficult polymerization conditions, especially for the free radical polymerization (FRP) of acrylates where oxygen acts as an efficient inhibitor of polymerization [24]. Oxygen inhibition is a major drawback for polymerization, especially when liquid monomers are used due to the facile oxygen diffusion inside the resins. At present, examples of visible light photoredox catalysts for polymerization activatable under low light intensity still remain scarce, despite the possibility to initiate a polymerization with such compounds while significantly reducing the energy consumption [25]. Given that organic and organometallic photoredox catalysts of polymerization have been developed since 2010, availability of metal-based photocatalysts remains extremely low [11,25]. This is notably related to the potential toxicity of the metals which are used to design these photocatalysts. However,
since 2010, a lot of effort has been made to reduce the toxicity by examining new metals. Additionally, it has to be mentioned that, contrary to organic photocatalysts which often exhibit a low molecular weight, metal complexes, due to the presence of the metal center and the peripheral ligands, possess generally a high molecular weight. This is an advantage for metal-based photocatalysts since in photopolymerization, the photocatalyst is classically introduced as a weight percent relative to the monomer so that, when converted into mole, the concentration of photocatalysts is extremely low.

With the aim to develop new photoinitiators, an interesting question remains concerning the exact role of the metal center in the catalytic activity of the photosensitizers. To examine this point, a wide range of metal complexes has been developed, aiming at establishing a structure-performance relationship. The development of new photocatalysts exhibiting improved light absorption properties centered in the visible range and displaying improved reactivities in photoinitiation undoubtedly represents, at present, still a great challenge. In this review, an overview of the different organometallic visible light photocatalysts developed for polymerization processes carried out under low light intensity and in solvent-free conditions is presented. Especially, a great deal of effort is devoted to developing highly reactive photoinitiating systems enabling the avoidance of using inert atmosphere to perform the polymerization.

## 2. Organometallic Photocatalysts

Photocatalytic activity of photoinitiators is directly related to key parameters, which are the following:

(1) Their absorption properties, including both their absorption range as well as their molar extinction coefficients. This characteristic is of crucial importance to reduce the photoinitiator content, as a photoinitiator with a high molar extinction coefficient can be introduced in reduced quantity.

(2) Their excited state lifetimes. Notably, polymerization efficiency is improved by elongating the excited state lifetime of photoinitiators. By providing more time for the excited compound to react with the different additives, the production of reactive species is improved.

(3) Their electrochemical properties. Indeed, to react with the different additives, photoinitiators should exhibit adapted redox potentials. By adapting the redox potentials, the rate constant of interaction of the photocatalyst with the additives can be drastically increased, boosting the polymerization speed. To develop photocatalytic systems, metal complexes should also display reversible oxidation and reduction processes.

### 2.1. *Ruthenium Complexes*

As mentioned in the introduction section, numerous visible light organometallic photocatalysts have been developed to realize various chemical transformations in organic chemistry [26–28]. Concerning photopolymerization, the first report mentioning the use of a ruthenium complex as a photocatalyst was published in 2010 [23]. For the proof of concept, the benchmark $Ru(II)(bpy)₃Cl₂$ (whereellenbpy stands for 2,2'-bipyridine) was used, and this complex is characterized by a strong absorption in the visible range, the absorption maximum being detected at 453 nm (14500 M⁻¹·cm⁻¹). In these conditions, $Ru(II)(bpy)₃Cl₂$ could efficiently promote the free radical promoted cationic polymerization (FRPCP) of epoxides when combined with an iodonium salt and a silane upon irradiation with laser diodes emitting at 405, 457, 473, and 532 nm (100 mW/cm²). Upon excitation of the three-component system $Ru(II)(bpy)₃²⁺/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺$ (0.2/3/2%, w/w/w) (where $TTMS₃Si-H$ and $Ph₂I⁺$ stand for tris(trimethylsilyl)silane and diphenyliodonium salt, respectively) with light, the selected $Ru(II)$ complex could react by electron transfer with the sacrificial quencher (i.e., the iodonium salt), generating a strong oxidant $Ru(II)(bpy)₃³⁺$. This strong oxidant is capable to oxidize the tris(trimethylsilyl)silane radical into the silylium cation $TTMS₃Si⁺$ responsible of the cationic polymerization (CP) of (3,4-epoxycyclohexane)methyl 3,4-epoxycyclohexylcarboxylate (EPOX), or biosourced limonene dioxide (LDO) (see Figure 2 and Scheme 1). In the present case, the CP of epoxides occurs according to a FRPCP mechanism. Indeed, the formation of $Ph•$ radicals and
subsequently $TTMS_3Si\cdot$ radicals by hydrogen abstraction from $TTMS_3Si-H$ is required prior to the formation of $TTMS_3Si^+$ cations. In turn, $TTMS_3Si\cdot$ (and $Ph\cdot$) will initiate the CP of epoxides. Excellent polymerization profiles could be obtained, since final monomer conversions higher than 95% and 60% could be determined for the ring-opening polymerization of EPOX after 400 s of irradiation of the photocurable resins with a laser diode at 457 and 532 nm under air, respectively. Conversely, a lower final monomer conversion was obtained with LDO upon irradiation at 457 nm, the conversion value only peaking at 60% after 400 s of irradiation. Interestingly, the possibility to initiate the polymerization of EPOX with sunlight was examined, and a conversion of 60% could be obtained after 9 min of sun exposure, in contrast to 5 min for an irradiation with green light. The slower conversion under sunlight was ascribed to the higher intensity of the green bulb (18 mW/cm$^2$ vs. 5 mW/cm$^2$ for sunlight).

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Chemical structures of $Ru(II)(bpy)_3Cl_2$ and the different monomers.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1.** Catalytic cycle involving $Ru(II)(bpy)_3Cl_2$ as the photocatalyst in an oxidative process with the three-component system $Ru(II)(bpy)_3^{2+}/TTMS_3Si-H/Ph_2I^+$.</figcaption></figure>

For future applications, the stability and possibility of storing the photocurable resins is an important parameter to consider. This point was also examined by the authors. In this study, after 21 days of storage, almost no modification of the photopolymerization profiles was observed, evidencing the suitability of $Ru(II)(bpy)_3Cl_2$ as photocatalyst (see Figure 3).
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Monomer conversions vs. time for the polymerization of 3,4-epoxycyclohexane)methyl 3,4-epoxycyclohexylcarboxylate (EPOX) upon irradiation with a xenon lamp under air using the three-component system Ru(II)(bpy)₃Cl₂/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) immediately after preparation (1) and after 21 days of storage (2). Adapted with permission from Lalevée et al. [23]. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

As another interesting feature, a slow bleaching of the film was observed, ascribed to the addition of silyl radicals onto the π-conjugated system of the bipyridine ligand of Ru(II)(bpy)₃Cl₂ [29]. Ability of photoinitiators to bleach during polymerization is actively researched by industrials who prefer the formation of colorless films. Indeed, the fabrication of colored polymers in industry should result from the incorporation of a dye that is carefully selected by the industrials and not from residual color imposed by the photoinitiators. As a consequence of the photobleaching, the polymerization process is not fully catalytic, since a slow consumption of the light-sensitive compound occurs during polymerization. However, this undesired consumption is sufficiently slow in the timescale of the polymerization process (a few hundred of seconds) not to impact the polymerization process.

As previously mentioned, Ru(II)(bpy)₃²⁺ can promote the formation of Ph• and TTMS₃Si• radicals (see Scheme 1) [23]. These radicals can thus be exploited to initiate the FRP of acrylates. Especially, the rate constant of the addition of TTMS₃Si• radicals on the double bond of methacrylates is relatively high (k > 10⁶ M⁻¹·s⁻¹), so that the free radical polymerization (FRP) of trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) can be obtained with these highly reactive radicals. A final monomer conversion of 35% within 120 s could be obtained with the three-component system Ru(II)(bpy)₃²⁺/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) [23]. In fact, these three-component systems are interesting formulations as they constitute dual radical/cation sources of polymerization.

In 2012, another Ru complex, i.e., Ru(II)(phen)₃Cl₂ (where phen stands for 1,10-phenanthroline), was tested under the same conditions as those used for Ru(II)(bpy)₃Cl₂ [30]. Despite similar absorption properties to those of Ru(II)(bpy)₃²⁺, a lower efficiency was found with this complex. Lower final monomer conversions were determined for the ring-opening polymerization of EPOX with a white light emitting diode LED (45% after 180 s) or a blue LED emitting at 450 nm (48% after 180 s) using the same composition, i.e., Ru(II)(phen)₃²⁺/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w). Counter performances of this complex were assigned to its higher oxidation potential, thus reacting less efficiently with the iodonium salt due to a lower rate constant of interaction. Examination of hydrogen donors other than the expensive TTMS₃Si-H did not improve the polymerization efficiencies. The final monomer conversions decreased to 5% with ethyl dimethylaminobenzoate after 180 s of irradiation and 40% with 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol using the former blue LED emitting at 450 nm. The higher final monomer conversion obtained with TTMS₃Si-H (48%) is attributable to its low ionization potential as well as its high oxidation rate constant by Ph₂I⁺ [31,32].

Even if the performance of ruthenium complexes as photocatalysts was remarkable (see Figure 3), no other Ru(II) complexes were examined for photopolymerization. This is not so much attributable to the cost of the Ru precursor RuCl₃·xH₂O (~ 65 €/gram) used to prepare these complexes but to the potential toxicity of the ruthenium complexes. Similarly, platinum complexes were also only
scarcely examined as photocatalysts of polymerization despite their good photoinitiating properties. However, in this last case, the toxicity was less concerning than the high cost of the Pt precursor PtCl₂ (~165 €/gram).

## 2.2. Platinum Complexes

Platinum complexes are complexes of crucial interest for photopolymerization, as these complexes exhibit good absorption properties over the visible range. These complexes are also characterized by extremely long-living triplet excited states in the microsecond timescale, making these complexes ideal candidates for photopolymerization. The first examples of Pt-based photocatalysts for photopolymerization were reported in 2012 [33]. However, it has to be mentioned that Pt complexes were previously used in redox-initiating systems of polymerization [34,35]. Here again, the two Pt complexes **Pt-1** and **Pt-2** proved to be efficient photocatalysts for the CP of EPOX in three-component photoinitiating systems (see Figure 4). If the absorption properties of **Pt-1** were limited in the visible range (the complex only absorbs until 440 nm), a broader absorption was found for **Pt-2**, extending from 400 to 540 nm. Due to the polyaromaticity of the ligand, a significant enhancement of the molar extinction coefficient was also found for **Pt-2** (48,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ for **Pt-2** at 496 nm vs. 7400 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ for **Pt-1** at 385 nm). A triplet excited state lifetime of ~ 20 µs was determined by Laser Flash Photolysis (LFP) experiments for the two complexes. Upon excitation of the three-component system **Pt complex**/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) under air with a halogen lamp, final conversions of 59% and 70% were obtained after 1000 s of irradiation with **Pt-1** and **Pt-2**, respectively, for the CP of EPOX. The higher photoinitiating ability of **Pt-2** can be confidently assigned to its enhanced and broader absorption properties over the whole visible range. Regeneration of **Pt-2** during polymerization was evidenced by flash laser photolysis (LFP) experiments. By comparing the LFP experiments done on the two-component system **Pt-2**/Ph₂I⁺ and the three-component system **Pt-2**/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺, photodegradation of **Pt-2** was determined as occurring more rapidly in the two-component system than in the three-component system. The regeneration of **Pt-2** in the three-component system by the silyl radical TTMS₃Si• was thus evidenced. Therefore, the chemical equation detailed below can be established as the reaction enabling the regeneration of **Pt-2** by oxidation of TTMS₃Si•.

$$ \mathrm{TTMS_3Si\bullet} + (\mathrm{Pt-2})^{\bullet+} \rightarrow \mathrm{TTMS_3Si}^{+} + \mathrm{Pt-2} $$

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Chemical structures of **Pt-1** and **Pt-2**.</figcaption></figure>

The regeneration of **Pt-2** was also confirmed by photoluminescence (PL) experiments, the PL spectrum of the final polymers superimposing that of the complex in solution. Finally, due to the simultaneous formation of cations and radicals during photoexcitation, the possibility to form an interpenetrated polymer network (IPN) was examined. While polymerizing a TMPTA/EPOX (50%/50%, w/w) blend in the previous conditions, final monomer conversions of 60% and 50% were respectively determined for EPOX and TMPTA after 1000 s of irradiation with the halogen lamp under air.

Once again, these excellent results with Pt complexes were not followed by subsequent works. This is notably attributable to the high cost of the Pt precursor (~ 165 €/gram), making this approach not applicable in industry, especially for polymers synthesis. However, other parameters also have to be considered to support the few examples of ruthenium and platinum complexes used as photocatalysts.
Notably, the possibility to finely tune the absorption properties of photocatalysts is a fundamental
criterion to adjust the absorption maximum of complexes with the emission wavelength of the
irradiation sources. Concerning this point, absorption properties of Ru and Pt complexes are difficult
to tune. The second point to consider is the reaction yields of synthesis of these different photocatalysts
which can adversely affect the interest for such metal complexes. This is partially the case for Ru and
Pt complexes which can only be obtained in moderate yields, around 40%–50% [36,37]. In fact, Ru and
Pt complexes have rapidly been replaced by Ir complexes for which the tunability of their absorption
properties was easier [38]. As the first consequence of this, numerous Ir complexes were also designed
and synthesized, enabling to establish a structure–performance relationship.

2.3. *Iridium Complexes*

Iridium complexes have been the focus of numerous researches due to the facile tunability of
their optical properties as well as their electrochemical properties [39–46]. Indeed, polypyridyl ligands
can be easily modified by chemical engineering, so that the absorption of complexes can be shifted
from the blue to the red region by replacing the well-known cyclometalated (2,4-difluorophenyl)
pyridine (dfppy) ligand [47] with the 1-phenylisoquinoline (piq) ligand [48]. In contrast to ruthenium
complexes, which are mostly prepared as homoleptic complexes, homoleptic, heteroleptic, but also
tris(cyclometalated) complexes exhibiting three different ligands [49] can be prepared. In contrast to
ruthenium complexes, which are only cationic complexes, cationic [50], anionic [51], soft salts [52,53],
and neutral iridium complexes can be designed. This point is of importance, especially as the efficiency
of the photoinitiating system is dependent on the ability for the metal complex to solubilize within
the photocurable resin. Due to the different advantages listed above, the scope of applications of
iridium complexes is extremely broad, ranging from organic electronics [54] to bioimaging [55] and
photoredox catalysis. In fact, iridium complexes have revolutionized the photocatalysis applied
to photopolymerization by the possibility to involve these complexes in oxidative and reductive
processes. Indeed, when introduced in a three-component Ir complex/iodonium salt/silane system,
Ir complexes are engaged in an oxidative mechanism [56,57]. Conversely, in the three-component
Ir complex/amine/alkyl halide system, Ir complexes are involved in a reductive pathway [23,58–61].
As other advantages, which concern the efficiency of the initiating step, complexes with high triplet
excited states and low oxidation potentials are actively researched. Iridium complexes clearly meet
these requirements [62,63].

From a synthetic point of view, the design of iridium complexes remains a great challenge and,
depending of the final charge of the complexes, major differences can be found concerning the reaction
yields. Irrespective of the final charge of iridium complexes, the synthesis of all complexes starts
with the same step, i.e., step 1 (see Scheme 2). It consists of the formation of the µ-dichloride-bridged
iridium dimer formed by refluxing IrCl3·3H2O with 2.5 equivalent cyclometalating ligands in a mixture
of 2-ethoxyethanol/water at a ratio of 3/1 by following the Nonoyama route [64]. In the second step,
the third ligand is introduced by a bridge-splitting and substitution reaction of the cyclometalated
iridium dimer (see Scheme 2). Depending of the nature of the third ligand, anionic, cationic, or
neutral iridium complexes can be formed. Thus, when a cyclometalating ligand is introduced,
tris(cyclometalated)iridium complexes can be synthesized with reaction yields higher than 70% [65,66]
but require harsh synthetic conditions (reaction temperature around 200 °C). Difficult purifications are
also encountered to isolate the complex in pure form. Conversely, heteroleptic complexes prepared with
an acetylacetonate ligand can be obtained with similar reaction yields to the tris(cyclometalated) ones.
However, the mild reaction conditions (heating at 65 °C) greatly simplify the purification by avoiding
the formation of numerous side-products [67]. Finally, the best reaction yields for the second step
are obtained for the synthesis of cationic and anionic complexes, the reaction yields ranging between
80% and 90% [68]. The first report mentioning the use of an iridium complex in photopolymerization
was reported in 2011 (see Figure 5) [61]. The benchmark tris(2-phenylpyridine) iridium Ir(ppy)3
could promote the FRP of TMPTA and the CP of EPOX in an oxidative mechanism. The reaction of
Ir(ppy)$_3$ with Ph$_2$I$^+$ is extremely fast, since a rate constant of interaction of $5.4 \times 10^9$ M$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ could be determined by quenching of the luminescent triplet state of Ir(ppy)$_3$. Based on the redox properties of the different additives composing the resin, a negative free energy change ($\Delta G < 0$) could be calculated using the Rehm–Weller equation, favorable to a fast polymerization process [69]. Regeneration of Ir(ppy)$_3$ in the three-component system Ir(ppy)$_3$/TTMS$_3$Si-H/Ph$_2$I$^+$ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w), and thus the demonstration of the photocatalytic character of the polymerization process, was evidenced once again by flash laser photolysis. Thus, the absorption peak at approximately 580 nm characteristic of Ir(ppy)$_3^+$ could not be detected in the UV-visible spectrum during photolysis, demonstrating the fast reduction of the Ir(ppy)$_3^+$ cation by TTMS$_3$Si•.

step 1

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

step 2

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 2.** Synthetic route to cationic, anionic, and neutral iridium (III) complexes.</figcaption></figure>

Excellent polymerization profiles were obtained for the CP of EPOX and the FRP of TMPTA. Final conversions of 80% after 400 s and 45% after 180 s were respectively obtained with the three-component Ir(ppy)$_3$/TTMS$_3$Si-H/Ph$_2$I$^+$ system (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) upon irradiation under air with a xenon lamp (60 mW/cm$^2$). While using soft irradiation conditions, i.e., LED bulbs (18 mW/cm$^2$), a final conversion of 60% after 120 s of irradiation was still determined for EPOX using the same resin composition. A comparison with a modified photoinitiating system, comprising Ru(II)(bpy)$_3^{2+}$ instead of Ir(ppy)$_3$ as the photocatalyst, evidenced the superiority of Ir(ppy)$_3$ over Ru(II)(bpy)$_3$Cl$_2$, and a final conversion of 60% was obtained after 180 s with Ru(II)(bpy)$_3^{2+}$ as opposed to 120 s for Ir(ppy)$_3$. The higher performance of Ir(ppy)$_3$ relative to Ru(II)(bpy)$_3^{2+}$ was assigned to its longer excited state lifetime (1.5 µs vs. 0.45 µs for Ru(II)(bpy)$_3^{2+}$), its lower oxidation potential (0.77 V vs. 1.3 V for Ru(II)(bpy)$_3^{2+}$), and its higher rate constant of interaction with Ph$_2$I$^+. Following these pioneering works on photopolymerization, thirty iridium complexes (Ir-1-Ir-30) were examined as photocatalysts for the FRP of acrylates, the CP of epoxides, the FRPCP of N-vinylcarbazole (NVK), or the generation of IPN. Their chemical structures are presented in Figure 5 [56–58,70–72].

Among this series, the polymerization could only be carried out with a laser diode at 532 nm with Ir-10-Ir-12 and Ir-25, which exhibit the most red-shifted absorptions. Specifically, Ir-10-Ir-12 and Ir-25 possess phenylisoquinolines as the cyclometalated ligands, which is a ligand well-known to red-shift both the absorption and the emission of iridium complexes. For all others, the polymerization could be carried out with Xe lamps, LEDs emitting at 462 and 514 nm, laser diodes emitting at 457 nm, or even sunlight. At similar photophysical properties (molar extinction coefficient, redox potential, etc.), major
differences and even irregularities were found between complexes during the FRP of acrylates or the FRPCP of epoxides. In fact, these differences of photoinitiating abilities were determined as originating from inequal solubilities of the different complexes in monomers (acrylates, epoxides). Here again, the solubility of photocatalysts proved to govern the reactivity of Ir complexes. For instance, the presence of fluorine atoms on iridium complexes is well known to drastically reduce the solubility in most of the common organic solvents.

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Chemical structures of iridium-based photocatalysts Ir-1-Ir-30.</figcaption></figure>
However, a lower solubility can also originate from the use of polyaromatic cyclometalated ligands. This is the case when the phenylpyridine ligand was replaced by a benzo[h]quinoline or a 1-phenylisoquinoline. To illustrate this, comparisons between the photoinitiating ability of two three-component photoinitiating systems Ir complex/Ph₂I⁺/TTMS₃Si-H comprising Ir(btpy)₃ Ir-4 or Ir(piq)₃ Ir-3 as the photosensitizers during the FRPCP of an EPOX/NVK mixture (50%/50% w/w) upon irradiation with a LED at 462 nm were established. It revealed the final monomer conversion to reach 40% for Ir(btpy)₃ Ir-4 instead of 85% for Ir(piq)₃ Ir-3 after 400 s of irradiation simply due to the lower solubility of Ir(btpy)₃ Ir-4 in the monomer mixture [72]. By chemical engineering, absorption spectra of iridium complexes could be adjusted to perfectly fit the emission of the light sources. A two-fold enhancement of the monomer conversion could be obtained for Ir-3 and Ir-5 relative to Ir-1, as a result of a better adequation of their absorption/emission spectra. To achieve this, polyaromatic ligands were used and the elaboration of a dinuclear complex Ir-5 was carried out. Thus, at 462 nm, corresponding to the emission of the laser diode, the molar extinction coefficients could be increased to 1100 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ for Ir-1, to 7700 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ for Ir(piq)₃ Ir-3, and even 23,550 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ for the dinuclear complex Ir-5. At identical weight percent in the photocurable resins, photopolymerization of an EPOX/NVK (50%/50% w/w) blend with the three-component system Ir complex/Ph₂I⁺/TTMS₃Si-H (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) for 400 s with a LED at 462 nm (2 mW/cm²) resulted in vinylic conversion values of 50%, 80%, and 85% for Ir-1, Ir-3, and Ir-5, respectively (see Figure 6a). Once again, the lower final conversion for the dinuclear complex Ir-5 relative to that of Ir-3 resulted from its lower solubility in the monomer blend, adversely affecting its photoinitiating ability.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** (A) Conversion of the vinylic function vs. time for an EPOX/NVK (N-vinylcarbazole) (50%/50% w/w) blend using the three-component photoinitiating system Ir complex/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) with (1) Ir-1, (2) Ir-5, and (3) Ir-3. Photopolymerization under air, upon irradiation with a LED at 462 nm; (B) photopolymerization of NVK in toluene (50%/50% w/w) under air using the three-component photoinitiating system Ir-3/TTMS₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) with a halogen lamp. Monomer conversion vs. time. Adapted with permission from Lalevée et al. [72]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

Another interesting finding is that the catalytic character of the polymerization process could be easily evidenced by comparing the photoluminescence (PL) of the polymer films with those of the corresponding photoinitiators. In all cases, a superimposition of both PL spectra could be obtained, revealing the regeneration of the different iridium complexes. A high reactivity of Ir-3 as a photocatalyst was also demonstrated by polymerizing NVK in aerated toluene (50%/50% w/w). A complete monomer conversion was obtained within 5 s with the three-component system Ir-3/Ph₂I⁺/TTMS₃Si-H (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) upon irradiation with a halogen lamp (8 mW/cm²) (see Figure 6b).

Ir-3 and Ir-5 proved to be remarkable photocatalysts since the polymerization could be ended after approximately 100 s irrespective of the polymerization conditions. Conversely, for all the other
complexes, reaction times ranging from 180 to 1000 s were required to get good final monomer
conversions. For all these polymerizations, relatively short inhibition times could be found despite
polymerizations being carried out under air, demonstrating the exceptional reactivity of TTMS<sub>3</sub>Si•.
In fact, the high photoinitiating ability of Ir complexes is directly related to the use of TTMS<sub>3</sub>Si-H in the
three-component systems, other additives resulting in lower final conversions. If the photoinitiating
abilities of ruthenium, platinum, and iridium complexes were promising, the environmental concerns
and toxicity issues raised by the use of transition metals have rapidly discarded these photocatalysts
for industrial applications. Starting from 2013 (i.e., only three years after the pioneering work
on Ru(II)(bpy)<sub>3</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> as a photocatalyst of polymerization), these issues were addressed with the
development of less toxic and cheap photocatalysts based on abundant metals such as zinc, copper,
and iron. In this field, the group of Jacques Lalevée is at the forefront of this research, developing
successively zinc, copper, and iron photocatalysts for photopolymerization carried out under low light
intensity and mostly under air in 2013, 2014, and 2015 respectively.

2.4. Zinc Complexes

In 2013, a new family of photocatalysts based on a cheap metal precursor, i.e. zinc, was developed
as a photoinitiator of photopolymerization. To illustrate the difference of costs, the Pt precursor (PtCl2)
is approximately 1100 times more expensive than Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (0.15 €/gram) which is the standard
reagent for the synthesis of Schiff base Zn(II) chelates, and IrCl3·2H2O is 450 times more expensive than
Zn(OAc)2·2H2O [73]. Considering that reaction yields for the synthesis of Schiff base Zn(II) chelates
range between 60% and 90% [74], and that zinc is clearly less toxic than Ru, Ir, and Pt, Schiff base Zn(II)
chelates have been thus examined for photopolymerization [75]. However, contrarily to the previous
complexes that were phosphorescent materials, meaning that these complexes exhibit long-living
excited states in the microsecond timescale, a different situation is found for Zn complexes. Indeed, the
latter ones only exhibit short excited state lifetimes in the nanosecond timescale. When Zn-1-Zn-3 were
examined as photocatalysts (see Figure 7), this severe reduction of the excited state lifetimes directly
impacted their photoinitiating abilities during the FRP of TMPTA with the standard three-component
system Zn complex/TTMS3Si-H/Ph2I+ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w). Final monomer conversions around
30% were obtained after 200 s of irradiation with a halogen lamp (13 mW/cm2) in laminates (i.e., in
oxygen-free conditions), far behind the conversion values determined with iridium photocatalysts,
where the polymerization reactions were additionally performed under air (see Figure 8).

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** Chemical structures of zinc-based photocatalysts **Zn-1-Zn-3** and tri (ethylene glycol) divinyl ether (DVE-3) additive.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** (A) Absorption spectra of **Zn-1-Zn-3** in acetonitrile with (1) **Zn-3**, (2) **Zn-2**, and (3) **Zn-1**. (B) Polymerization profiles of trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) in laminate (A) upon irradiation with a halogen lamp using the three-component system Zn complex/(TMS)₃Si-H/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/3%/2%, w/w/w) with (2) **Zn-1**, (3) **Zn-2**, and (4) **Zn-3**. Reprinted from [75]. Copyright (2013) with permission from Elsevier.</figcaption></figure>

These results clearly show the crucial role of the excited state lifetimes in favoring the reaction between the photoinitiator and the different additives. Influence of this parameter on the photoinitiating ability is more clearly evidenced if a comparison of the molar extinction coefficients between **Zn-1-Zn-3** is established. Indeed, **Zn-1** and **Zn-2** only exhibit small molar extinction coefficients (4700 and 5700 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 350 nm, respectively) contrarily to **Zn-3** which is characterized by a strong absorption (38,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 550 nm). Despite the eight-fold enhancement of the absorption properties of **Zn-3**, similar polymerization profiles were obtained for **Zn-1-Zn-3** (see Figure 8). It has to be noted that in the present case, **Zn-1-Zn-3** exhibited similar solubility properties in TMPTA and that this parameter has not to be considered to explain the difference of reactivities. Low efficiencies only result from unfavorable rate constants of interaction with Ph₂I⁺.

Finally, by replacing TTMS₃Si-H with tri (ethylene glycol) divinyl ether (DVE-3) as the additive in the following three-component system **Zn-3**/DVE-3/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/6%/2%, w/w/w), the monomer conversion could be increased up to 45% after 400 s of irradiation with a laser diode at 532 nm. Noticeably, a colorless polymer was obtained after polymerization. In fact, the formation of a colorless coating after polymerization is indicative of a fast degradation of **Zn-3** during the polymerization process. This result also supports the low final conversions obtained with the three Zn complexes while using TTMS₃Si-H as the reductant, the photostability of Schiff base Zn(II) chelates being limited. Facing these considerations (low stability, moderate ability to initiate the FRP of acrylates), more stable complexes based on copper were then examined.

## 2.5. Copper Complexes

Copper complexes are metal complexes that have been widely used for thermal atom transfer radical polymerizations (ATRP) [76–78]. More recently, these complexes have also been used for a new mechanism of polymerization named MABLI (metal acetylacetonate–bidentate ligand interaction) involving the generation of acetylacetonate (acac•) radicals by a redox process enabling the initiation of the FRP of acrylates [79–83]. This point will be discussed later in this paragraph. In the context of photoactivated polymerization processes, the first report was published in 2014 with a series of complexes bearing *bis*(2-(diphenylphosphino) phenyl) ether (DPEPhos) or 4,5-*bis*(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene (XantPhos) as the phosphorylated ligands (see Figure 9) [84–87]. From a synthetic point of view, these complexes are easy to synthesize and can be obtained in two steps, the first one consisting of the complexation of the Cu(I) cation with the
phosphorylated ligand, followed by the second step introducing the ancillary ligand. Overall, copper complexes can be prepared with reaction yields ranging between 75% and 90% (see Scheme 3).

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 9.** Chemical structures of copper-based photocatalysts Cu-1-Cu22.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 3.** Synthetic route to copper (I) complexes.</figcaption></figure>

These complexes proved to be efficient photoinitiators. Good final conversions could be obtained for the polymerization of EPOX or TMPTA even with the use of two-component photoinitiating systems. Cu complex/iod (0.5%/1%, w/w) (where iod stands for (methyl-4-phenyl (methyl-1-ethyl)-4-phenyl) iodonium tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) borate). However, it has to be noted that these results are obtained in laminates and not under air. While using three-component systems, an enhancement of approximately 10% of the final conversions could be obtained with all complexes. Thus, if a final conversion of 48% was obtained for the polymerization of TMPTA after 500 s of irradiation with a halogen lamp in laminate with the Cu-2/Ph₂I⁺ (0.5%/1%, w/w) system. This conversion could be improved until 56% with the Cu-2/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/2%, w/w) system where the copper concentration has been divided by a factor of 2.5 to reduce the inner filter effects [84].
Comparison of the final conversions obtained for the photopolymerization of TMPTA with **Cu-2** and bisacylphosphine oxide (BAPO, also named Irgacure 819) used as a reference in the three-component system photocatalyst/iod/NVK (0.2%/2%/3%, w/w/w) (where iod stands for (methyl-4-phenyl (methyl-1-ethyl)-4-phenyl) iodonium) revealed the exceptional photoinitiating ability of **Cu-2**. For polymerization carried out at identical weight percent and under irradiation at 405 nm, **Cu-2** could outperform BAPO (see Figure 10). While carefully examining the results obtained with the **Cu-1-Cu22** series, two main groups of complexes could be identified. As the first group, those comprising bulky groups at the inner positions of the bipyridine ligand, such as **Cu-2**, **Cu-3**, **Cu-5**, **Cu-6**, **Cu-11**, and **Cu-13**, could give higher photoinitiating performances than those of the second group only composed of complexes that are not sterically hindered. It has to be noted that all complexes from the first group showed longer excited state lifetimes than those of the second one. But these results have to be considered in light of the recent development concerning copper complexes.

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 10.** Photopolymerization profiles for the polymerization of TMPTA in laminate using the three-component system **Cu-2**/Iod/NVK (0.2%/2%/3%, w/w/w) upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm (1), a LED at 455 nm (2). Polymerization profile for the polymerization of TMPTA with the three-component system bisacylphosphine oxide (BAPO)/Iod/NVK (0.2%/2%/3%, w/w/w) upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm. Adapted with permission from Xiao et al. [84]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

Indeed, the differences in photoinitiating abilities observed between the two groups directly arise from the possibility or not for copper complexes to give rise to a major structural rearrangement upon excitation. Indeed, when excited, hindered complexes cannot promote a structural rearrangement. However, for the non-hindered complexes, a modification of their geometrical structures from a tetrahedral geometry to a square planar geometry can occur. It has to be noted that, in the literature, numerous copper complexes have been reported as being phosphorescent materials due to their long excited state lifetimes. In fact, most of these complexes were thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials [88]. In 2012, Chihaya Adachi evidenced with a series of organic and organometallic compounds the property of thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) resulting from a small energy splitting existing between the singlet and the triplet excited states, so that the singlet state can be thermally repopulated from the triplet state by reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) [89,90]. Even though this property has been known since 1961 [91], it had not been exploited before 2012 and was only valorized by the design of the third generation of emitters for organic light-emitting diodes OLEDs, enabling devices to reach 100% internal quantum efficiency [92]. As the first manifestation of this property, an elongation of the excited state lifetime combined with an enhancement of the photoluminescence quantum yield are observed. Therefore, if numerous copper complexes have been reported as phosphorescent materials prior to the demonstration of the TADF property, numerous complexes were in fact TADF materials. The difference of photoinitiating
ability between TADF/non-TADF photoinitiators was rationalized in 2018, with the comparison of two copper complexes, **Cu-23** and **Cu-24** (see Figure 11) [93]. For this demonstration, two complexes were selected for the similarity of their molar extinction coefficients as well as their absorption spectra. In these conditions, evidence of the contribution of the TADF properties on photoinitiation could be demonstrated. Notably, a significant enhancement of the excited state lifetime was found for the TADF complex, i.e., 2.5 µs for **Cu-24** vs. 0.02 µs for **Cu-23**. Benefits of this 125-fold enhancement of the excited state lifetime was evidenced during the FRPCP of EPOX using the three-component system Cu complex/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/NVK (0.5%/1%/1% w/w/w) (30% of conversion for **Cu-24** vs. 12% for **Cu-23** upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm for 400 s under air) or during the FRP of the acrylate-based dental resin 2,2-bis[4-(methacryloxy-2-hydroxypropoxy) phenyl]propane (BisGMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) 50%/50% (65% of conversion for **Cu-24** vs. 35% for **Cu-23** upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm for 400 s under air) using the three-component system Cu complex/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/EDB (0.5%/1%/1% w/w/w) (where (tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ and EDB stand for bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)iodonium and ethyl 4-(dimethylamino)benzoate, respectively).

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 11.** Chemical structures of copper-based photocatalysts **Cu-23** and **Cu-24**.</figcaption></figure>

It has to be noted that among additives widely used in three-component systems, NVK is one of those [94]. Indeed, after sensitization of the iodonium salt, phenyl radicals Ph• are produced, which are species efficiently initiating the FRP of acrylates. However, Ph• can also be added to NVK and produce a radical Ph-NVK•, stabilized by the mesomeric effect and being of lower reactivity than Ph•. This radical can also be converted to a cation by reduction of the oxidized form of the photocatalyst. Consequently, a Ph-NVK⁺ cation of high reactivity is obtained, efficiently promoting the ring opening of epoxides by FRPCP (see Scheme 4).

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 4.** Catalytic cycle involving copper complexes as photocatalysts in an oxidative process.</figcaption></figure>

Among TADF complexes, **Cu-2** (also known as the “G1” complex) has been the focus of numerous publications due to its unique photoinitiating properties. This complex, which has been patented in 2015, is even now commercialized by Lambson Ltd. in different photocurable resins [95]. To establish its remarkable photocatalytic properties, a comparison was established with the benchmark photoinitiator
Irgacure 819 (BAPO) which also absorbs at 405 nm. The comparison was done under industrial conditions, namely with a model resin (MR 1) and under air (see Figure 12) [96]. More recently, a comparison of **Cu-2** with the non-TADF **Cu-1** complex has also been established [97]. However, the trends determined during this second series of comparisons were the same as those obtained with BAPO; **Cu-2** was outperforming all photoinitiators with which a comparison was established. While using the three-component photoinitiator/(tert-Bu)Ph2I⁺/NVK (1.7%/5%/1%, w/w/w) system, a final conversion close to 100% was obtained upon photopolymerizing a model resin (MR1) at 405 nm (230 mW/cm²) for 800 s under air with **Cu-2**. Conversely, a conversion of only 60% was obtained with BAPO (see Figure 13a). Considering the higher molecular weight of **Cu-2** relative to BAPO, the superiority of **Cu-2** at comparable weight percent was established. Further experiments consisting of decreasing the photocatalyst content revealed that photoinitiating performance with **Cu-2** remained higher than that of BAPO, even at 0.12 w%, constituting a 30-fold decrease of the photocatalyst content (see Figure 13b).

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 12.** Chemical structures of copper-based photocatalysts **Cu-2**, BAPO, and the different monomers in the model resin (MR1).</figcaption></figure>

Another finding of crucial industrial interest is the possibility for the photoinitiating system to give rise to a dark polymerization, occurring when the light is switched off. Indeed, during light irradiation, radicals and cations are photogenerated and these latter can continue to polymerize the resin after the end of the irradiation. Evidence of a living polymerization process was clearly demonstrated by irradiating the resin for a short time and by following the final conversion increase when the light was switched off. A 22% increase of the monomer conversion was determined with **Cu-2**, in contrast to 12% for the three-component system comprising BAPO, 400 s after the end of irradiation (see Figure 13c).

Finally, green synthesis of photoinitiators is another topic attracting both academic and industrial interest. The possibility to prepare **Cu-2** by mechanosynthesis, by grinding the different reagents in an agate mortar, was examined, and the performance of the mechanosynthesized complex was remarkable [98]. First, the complex obtained by grinding was of high purity (higher than 95%), which was demonstrated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Parallel to this, a 170-fold enhancement of the reaction time was obtained by mortar grinding. Indeed, if the synthesis in solution phase can be done in two hours, the reaction time could be reduced to 310 s by mortar grinding. Considering the high purity of the mechanosynthesized complex, a similar performance of the photoinitiator formed by grinding or in solution could be obtained for the FRPCP of epoxides or the FRP of acrylates. Another aspect of interest of mechanosynthesis is the possibility to realize the synthesis of compounds that could not be obtained in the traditional solution phase (see Scheme 5).
<figure><img src="image_21.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 13.** (A) Epoxide conversion vs. time for the model resin (MR1) under air using the three-component systems **Cu-2**/Iod/NVK (1.7%/4.6%/1%, w/w/w) and BAPO/Iod/NVK (1.8%/5%/1%, w/w/w) upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm. (B) Comparison of the final monomer conversion vs. time between the three-component systems **Cu-2**/Iod/NVK (0.05%-0.22%/5%/1%, w/w/w) and BAPO/Iod/NVK (1.8%/5%/1%, w/w/w). (C) Epoxide conversion vs. time for the model resin (MR1) under air using the three-component systems **Cu-2**/Iod/NVK (1.7%/4.6%/1%, w/w/w) and BAPO/Iod/NVK (1.8%/5%/1%, w/w/w) upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm. The light was turned off after 60 seconds. Adapted from [96] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 5.** Synthetic route to **Cu-2**.</figcaption></figure>
In this work, the synthesis of **Cu-2** bearing I⁻ as the counteranion could be obtained upon grinding for 30 min. However, a lower purity was obtained (only 72% yield) (see Figure 14). In fact, the counteranion used to generate cationic photocatalysts is not without influence on the photoinitiating ability of the latter [99]. Indeed, when a stronger ion pair is formed between the cation and the anion, a lower reactivity is observed for the photocatalyst. This difference of reactivity was notably demonstrated by examining the photoinitiating ability of **Cu-2** under the form of PF₆⁻, BF₄⁻, and I⁻ salts for the FRP of a model methacrylate resin (MR2) of low viscosity (0.053 Pa·s) composed of 1,4-butanedioldimethacrylate (33.3 wt%), hydroxypropylmethacrylate (33.3 wt%), and urethane-dimethacrylate (33.3 wt%) using the two-component **Cu-2**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ (0.3%/0.8%, w/w) system (see Figure 15).

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 14.** Mechanosynthesis of **Cu-2.BF₄** (A) and **Cu-2.I** (B). Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [98]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 15.** Chemical structures of the monomers used in the model resin (MR2).</figcaption></figure>

Indeed, as previously mentioned, one drawback of the FRP of acrylates is the inhibition of the polymerization process by oxygen. This phenomenon is amplified when a resin of low viscosity is used due to the facile diffusion of oxygen and when the polymerization is carried out under air. Consequently, use of such liquid resins is often selected to evidence the high reactivity of the photoinitiating system, the three-component system thus operating in difficult conditions. In the present case, upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm under air, a short inhibition time was found for **Cu-2.PF₆** and **Cu-2.BF₄**, around 10 s, which increased to 40 s for **Cu-2.I**. Despite these significant differences, and a slower polymerization process with **Cu-2.I**, identical final monomer conversions could be found with the three photoinitiating systems after only 160 s of irradiation.

Control of the production of radicals is a great challenge especially for photopolymerization. Indeed, for 3D-printing applications, a spatial and temporal control is researched meaning that the polymerization should only occur in the irradiated zone and for the time that the surface is exposed to light. The polymerization process should stop immediately after the light is switched off. In these conditions, precise figures can be photopolymerized. As exemplified in Figure 16, a precise figure could be obtained using **Cu-2** for the FRP and the FRPCP of a blend of TMPTA/MR1 30%/70% upon exposure to a LED projector at 405 nm. Well-defined 3D written patterns were obtained with the
three-component photoinitiating system **Cu-2**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/NVK (0.2%/5%/1%, w/w/w), notably due to the copolymerization of epoxides and acrylates avoiding the shrinkage effects.

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 16.** 3D-polymerization experiments with a LED projector at 405 nm (I = 110 mW/cm²). (A) different 3D figures imaged by numerical microscopy. (B) A 3D figure characterized by profilometry. Reprinted from [97]. Copyright (2019) with permission from Elsevier.</figcaption></figure>

However, for numerous industrial applications and especially for the photopolymerization of coatings on complex structures for which the surface cannot be fully exposed to light, the possibility to initiate a polymerization in shadowed area is actively researched [100]. Concerning this point, a remarkable example was reported with **Cu-2** [101].

Once again, **Cu-2** was tested in difficult conditions since the low viscosity resin MR2 was used for this study. To design a propagating three-component photocurable resin, NVK or EDB were not selected as the reducing agents but tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate or bismuth(III) 2-ethylhexanoate. A comparison of the two photoinitiating systems **Cu-2**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (0.2%/1%/5%, w/w/w) and **Cu-2**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/ bismuth(III) 2-ethylhexanoate (0.2%/1%/5%, w/w/w) revealed the FRP of MR2 upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm under air to be extremely fast, since a conversion of 83% was obtained within 30 s for the first photoinitiating system and 70% in 150 s for the second one. Considering the better performance of tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate as the reducing agent, tests of radical photopolymerization in shadowed areas were only carried out with this reductant. From an experimental point of view, the setup is extremely simple since a Pasteur pipette is filled with the photocurable resin and only the extremity of the pipette is exposed to light, the rest of the pipette being protected from light. After polymerization, the pipette is broken, and the length of the polymer is measured. Using this procedure and by irradiating a three-component photoinitiating system in which the **Cu-2** concentration has been reduced to 0.15 wt% to get a better light penetration, the polymerization of the MR2 resin was determined as propagating until 9 cm from the irradiation point after irradiating for 4 minutes (see Figure 17). A remarkable final monomer conversion could be determined even at the extremity of the polymerized resin (77%). Interestingly, the polymerization of a MR2 resin comprising 45 wt% of barium glass fillers could also be performed in the same conditions and a polymer extending over 8.5 cm was obtained, with a monomer conversion of 55% over the whole polymer after only 4 minutes of irradiation. This result is exceptional considering that the light penetration inside the filled sample is considerably reduced due to light diffusion by the fillers. To monitor the progress of the polymerization process, an infrared thermal imaging camera was used, as the polymerization of acrylate is exothermic. Using the camera, a polymerization temperature increasing to 70°C could be determined, and the progress of the polymerization front inside the resin could follow "live" (see Figure 18).
<figure><img src="image_26.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 17.** (A) Experimental setup used for the polymerization in shadowed areas; (B) the Pasteur pipette containing the resin before irradiation; (C) the polymer obtained after breaking the Pasteur pipette for measuring the length; (D) monomer conversion as a function of the distance. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [101]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 18.** Pasteur pipette containing the filled MR2 resin before (A) and after (B) breaking the pipette; (C) monomer conversion as a function of the distance; (D) evolution of the temperature as a function of the reaction time followed by infrared thermal imaging camera. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [101]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

In 2016, an interesting concept concerning the development of a new redox initiating system was proposed. Precisely, a particular reaction between copper (II) acetate and 2-dppba was identified as being capable to generate acac• as a radical source to initiate the FRP of acrylates [102,103]. This unprecedented route to produce carbon-centered acac• radicals was named by the authors "metal acetylacetonate-bidentate ligand interaction" (MABLI) and this initial concept was largely exploited so that its photoactivation was rendered possible in 2018 [79,82,83,104]. As shown in the Figure 19a, by mixing copper (II) acetate and 2-dppba, a ligand exchange, a modification of the oxidation degree of
copper accompanied with the release of an acac• was demonstrated with this two-component system. Ligand exchange in a solution is extremely fast, occurring within 5 seconds in THF (see Figure 19b).

<figure><img src="image_28.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 19.** (A) Redox reaction occurring between Cu(acac)₂ and 2-dppba. (B) Ligand exchange reaction in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution. (a) Solution color after addition of 2-dppba to a Cu(acac)₂ solution. (b) Solution color before addition of 2-dppba. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [102]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

This unexpected reaction is of crucial interest to promote the redox FRP of acrylates without taking recourse to the standard amine/peroxide combination raising numerous toxicity and safety concerns. Notably, depending on the substitution pattern, amines can be extremely toxic, and peroxides are also known to be potentially explosive. For these reasons, long-term storage of these resins is a major issue for industry, and alternatives to amines and peroxides are thus actively researched by both the industrial and the academic communities [105]. By introducing Ph₂I⁺ in the two-component Cu(acac)₂/2-dppba system, re-oxydation of Cu(I) to Cu(II) was possible. A photoactivation of the polymerization of the methacrylate (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) mixture with this three-component system (Cu(acac)₂/Ph₂I⁺/2-dppba) could also be realized by irradiating at 405 nm, as Cu(acac)₂ absorbs at this wavelength. Proof of the exceptional efficiency of the photoactivation was also evidenced by adding 0.024 wt% of a strong polymerization inhibitor (tempol) and polymerizing under air. In fact, tempol was introduced to reduce the polymerization efficiency and thus evidence the contribution of light irradiation. Besides these difficult polymerization conditions, an enhancement of 40% of the monomer conversion was obtained upon irradiation, increasing the monomer conversion from 40% to 80% (see Figure 20). However, this redox photoactivated system was not catalytic. This is notably due to the release of an acac• from the coordination sphere of the metal center, which happens irreversibility.

This issue was addressed in 2018 by totally modifying the formulation and by replacing the three partners in the former three-component system (Cu(acac)₂/Ph₂I⁺/2-dppba), namely 2-dppba by vitamin-C (Vit-C), Ph₂I⁺ by dibenzoyl peroxide, and Cu(acac)₂ by copper (II) 2-ethylhexanoate (Cu(Oct)₂ or copper (II) acetate (Cu(OAc)₂) [79]. Using this new three-component system, no acac• radicals are formed but Ph(C=O)O• resulting from the decomposition of BPO. Conversely, regeneration of the metal center is facilitated in this last case, as 2-ethylhexanoate and acetate ligands are labile ligands.

If the mechanism of polymerization was now catalytic, FRP efficiency of the three-component (Cu(OAc)₂/BPO/Vit-C) remained lower than that of the reference two-component 4-N,N-trimethylaniline/BPO system. A lower exothermicity was measured by pyrometry (58 °C vs. 100 °C). Photoactivation of the polymerization of IPNs was also examined with the simultaneous polymerization of EPOX with the methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) using the
four-component system (Cu(Oct)₂/BPO/Vit-C/Ph₂I⁺). Due to the limited absorption of Cu(Oct)₂ in the visible range, photoactivation of the resin could only be carried out at 405 nm. As shown in Figure 21, the accelerating effect of light was obvious, even if no real impact on the exothermicity of the polymerization was found. However, a higher final conversion for the acrylate functions was nevertheless obtained (70% of final monomer conversion upon irradiation vs. 50% without light). Considering that light does not contribute to a higher exothermicity of the reaction, the origin of this unexpected behavior was researched.

<figure><img src="image_29.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 20.** (A) Redox polymerization and photoactivated redox polymerization of the methacrylate (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) mixture with the three-component system Cu(acac)₂/Ph₂I⁺/2-dppba (0.75%/1.1%/1.5%, w/w/w) with and without irradiation with a LED at 405 nm. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [102]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 21.** (A) Optical pyrometric measurements for the polymerization of EPOX/methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) blend under air using a four component system (Cu(Oct)₂/BPO/Vit-C/Ph₂I⁺, 0.75%/1.1%/1.5%/1%, w/w/w/w) with and without light irradiation at 405 nm; (B) Raman surface analysis of the samples. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [80]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

While getting a deeper insight into the chemical mechanism, the cationic system Cu(Oct)₂/Ar₂I⁺/reductant proved to be an effective combination to initiate the CP of epoxides, even in the absence of light. Electron spin resonance (ESR) analyses revealed that the Cu(Oct)₂/Ph₂I⁺/reductant combination does not produce radicals, as no electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal was detected. Conversely, presence of a pH-indicator (ethyl red) in a solution of Cu(Oct)₂ and Ph₂I⁺ revealed the reaction media to become acidic upon addition of the reductant as the result of the
formation of H⁺. From the different experiments, it could be concluded that without light, Cu(II)(Oct)₂ could be reduced to Cu(I) by Vit-C and that the reduced form of Cu(Oct)₂ could interact with Ph₂I⁺ to produce protons (see Scheme 6). Parallel to this, upon light excitation, Cu(Oct)₂ can directly interact in its excited state with Ph₂I⁺, producing Ph•, and thus improving the final monomer conversion of acrylates. In light of these results, light activation only marginally contributes to the formation of radicals. The main source of radicals results from the redox process between Cu(II) and BPO.

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 6.** The different catalytic cycles involved in the photoactivated redox polymerization of the methacrylate (1,4-BDMAHPMA/UDMA)/EPOX blend using Cu(Oct)₂ as the catalyst in the four-component system Cu(Oct)₂/BPO/Vit-C/Ph₂I⁺.</figcaption></figure>

The combination of a redox and a photoinitiated polymerization within a single three-component system is quite unique and relies on the dual role of copper complexes in these systems, acting both as a redox agent and a photosensitizer. However, efficiency of these double-mode polymerization systems is directly related to the generation of radicals out of the coordination sphere of the metal center (Ph(C=O)O• instead of acac•) and the use of weakly coordinating ligands (acetate ligands). This last parameter is of crucial importance, especially for the redox system where a modification of the oxidation degree of copper is observed. Parallel to this, efficiency of these systems is also based on the absorption ability of copper complexes in the visible range.

These results are consistent with those previously reported for another copper (I) complex, namely **Cu-25** (see Figure 22). In the four-component **Cu-25**/Vit-C/BPO/(t-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ system, the redox reaction was again found to be more important for the FRP of the methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) than the interaction in the excited state of the Cu(I)/(t-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ combination (producing Ph•) [106].

As shown in Figure 22, the contribution of the photoactivated process is marginal to the overall polymerization process. Indeed, almost no enhancement of the reaction temperature as well as no modification of the reaction time was found, demonstrating the dark polymerization to be mainly responsible of the FRP of acrylates.
<figure><img src="image_32.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 22.** Optical pyrometric measurements for the polymerization of the methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) under air using the four-component system **Cu-25**/Vit-C/BPO/(*t*-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ (0.5%/1.3%/1.4%/2%, w/w/w/w) in the presence of tempol (0.13–0.15 w%) upon irradiation with a LED at 405 nm (**A**), LED at 470 nm (**B**), and LED at 530 nm (**C**). Adapted from [106] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.</figcaption></figure>

## 2.6. Iron Complexes

Following the different works done on ruthenium, iridium, zinc, and copper complexes, iron complexes have been identified as potential candidates for polymerization and tested for the first time in 2015 in the context of photoredox catalysis [107–113]. Indeed, prior to this work, photopolymerization of acrylates or styrene with iron complexes have already been reported in the literature [114–116]. Similarly, numerous combinations of ferrocenium salts have also been used for the FRP of acrylates under visible light in the past [117–120]. As a main advantage, iron is one of the cheapest metals. This element is also extremely abundant on Earth. Contrarily to ruthenium, iridium, and copper complexes, iron complexes exhibit a major drawback, namely, their relatively short excited-state lifetimes in the nanosecond timescale or even below, what could result in inefficient interactions with the iodonium salt during light irradiation and a poor reactivity [121]. However, as previously detailed, the excited state lifetime is not the only parameter governing the reactivity of photocatalysts. The molar extinction coefficient, the rate constant of interaction with the iodonium salt, or the solubility also have to be considered. As observed for iridium complexes, iron-based photocatalysts could be used both in oxidative and reductive cycles for the FRP of acrylates. Thus, parallel to the classical oxidative cycle Fe complex/Ph₂I⁺/NVK, reactive radicals could also be produced with the following three-component Fe complex/EDB/R-Cl system (where R-Cl is a halogenated aromatic ring). In this last case, R• and EDB(-H)• are both formed as initiating species (see Scheme 7). Since the regeneration of Fe complexes likely occurs, an extremely low photocatalyst content could be used, as low as 0.02 wt%. Considering that all iron complexes absorb around 400 nm, these complexes are thus good candidates for photopolymerization carried out at 405 nm (see Figure 23).
<figure><img src="image_33.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 7.** Catalytic cycle involving a Fe complex as the photocatalyst in a reductive process.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_34.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 23.** Chemical structures of iron-based photocatalysts Fe-1-Fe22.</figcaption></figure>
As often observed, the two-component systems Fe complex/Ph₂I⁺ (0.2%/2%, w/w) were less efficient than the three-component photoinitiating system Fe complex/Ph₂I⁺/NVK (0.2%/2%/3%, w/w/w) for the FRP of TMPTA. An improvement of the final monomer conversion of approximately 15% was observed for all complexes. The highest conversion could be obtained with **Fe-4**, peaking at 59% upon irradiation at 405 nm for 400 s in laminate. After storage of the photocurable resin for a month at room temperature, a final conversion of 57% could be still obtained, demonstrating the stability of the formulation. A comparison with BAPO as a reference revealed only the nitro-substituted iron photocatalysts, such as **Fe-4** and **Fe-8**, to rival with BAPO (53% of conversion at identical percentage in weight) for the FRP of TMPTA.

The superiority of the nitro-substituted complexes **Fe-4** and **Fe-8** over the other photoinitiators was confirmed during the FRPCP of EPOX. Final conversions ranged between 42% (for **Fe-8**) and 54% (for **Fe-4**), in contrast to 17% (for **Fe-2**) or 19% (for **Fe-1**) for the non-substituted ones. By decreasing the photocatalyst content to 0.02 wt%, the remarkable photoinitiating ability of **Fe-4** could be revealed. A final conversion of 42% could still be obtained, in contrast to the dramatic decrease observed for BAPO (18%). Interestingly, photocatalysts bearing nitro-substituents (**Fe-4**, **Fe-8**, **Fe-19**) could outperform all the other iron photocatalysts. This trend is not only observed with iron complexes but also with purely organic photoinitiators [122,123]. If this structure-performance relationship could be established numerous times by comparing the results obtained for photoinitiators bearing nitro groups or not, the origin of this improvement has not been clearly established by the authors. Notably, the photophysical properties of photocatalysts are only marginally impacted by the introduction of the nitro groups.

In the past, photopolymerization has been almost exclusively used to prepare coatings and in this aim, multifunctional monomers were typically employed so that a robust crosslinked polymer could be obtained. However, based on the recent environmental concerns and the desire to develop green syntheses of polymers, numerous attempts have been carried out to develop a controlled polymerization of monofunctional monomers using light as the activation source. Contrary to polymers obtained with multifunctional monomers that form an insoluble crosslinked polymer network, soluble polymers with linear chains can be obtained using a monofunctional monomer. Analyses of the chain length as well as the polydispersity of polymers can be thus performed.

At present, only a low or moderate control of the polymer size is obtained by photopolymerization, high polydispersity indices being determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) [124,125]. This result is counterintuitive since, from a theoretical point of view, a higher control of the polymerization process should be obtained by using light, when the polymerization reaction is carried out at room temperature. In these conditions, the competition between polymerization and side-reactions should be avoided [126–136]. However, the production of highly reactive radicals still limits the control of the polymerization process, even if some attempts have been made to introduce control agents, as exemplified with photoassisted nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP2) [124,125]. Another interesting feature is that dormant species which can only be activated by light can also be created, enabling a subsequent chemical modification of the initial polymer. The first report mentioning the use of iron complexes for the controlled radical photopolymerization (CRP2) of different acrylates was reported in 2016 [110]. In this series, **Fe-4** proved again to be an interesting candidate. A polymerization "on-demand" of methyl methacrylate (MMA) using the three-component system **Fe-4**/EBr/EDB (where EBr stands for ethyl α-bromo-phenylacetate) could be obtained (see Figure 24a). A good linearity of the MMA conversion as a function of time was also demonstrated (see Figure 24b). Due to the living character of the photopolymerization, a re-initiation of the polymerization process was possible with butyl acrylate (BA). Block copolymers poly(MMA)-b-poly(BA) could be prepared and the M~n~ increased from 55,000 g/mol for poly(MMA) to 250,000 g/mol for the copolymer (see Figure 24c). However, the polydispersity for these polymers remained high.
<figure><img src="image_35.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 24.** Polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in toluene using the three-component photoinitiating system **Fe-4**/EBr/EDB upon irradiation at 405 nm with a LED. (A) Evolution of the monomer conversion vs. time; (B) evolution of Mn with the monomer conversion; (C) re-initiation experiments of polymerization of a poly(MMA) using butyl acrylate. Insert: chemical structure of the poly(MMA)-b-poly(BA) copolymer. Reprinted with permission from Telitel et al. [110]. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</figcaption></figure>

Finally, surface modification was also examined with **Fe-4**. To evidence this, the hydrophilic surface of a polyacrylate was converted to a hydrophobic one by re-initiating the polymerization with a fluorinated monomer. The contact angle of the polymer surface changed from 60° to 115°, demonstrating the hydrophobicity of the surface after photochemical modification. To further evidence the polymerization of a second layer on top of the first one, a mask was used so that the first layer was only partially exposed to light. A spatial control of the polymerization could be obtained. Analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) confirmed only the surface exposed to light to be chemically modified and fluorine to be only found in this area (see Figure 25). Finally, the iron (III)-based metal-organic framework (MOF), which is a porous structure, was also used as a photoinitiator of polymerization in combination with an iodonium salt and NVK to promote the FRPCP of epoxides or the FRP of acrylates under visible light [137]. The photocatalytic activity of MOFs is well-known in the literature [138–140], as these catalysts have been used for the alkoxylation of propylene glycol [141] or acrylic acid [142], or the degradation of Rhodanine 6G [143]. The use of these coordination polymers is of crucial interest for the design of composite materials, these organic/inorganic hybrid materials acting as fillers capable of modifying the mechanical properties of the final polymers [144–149]
<figure><img src="image_36.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 25.** (A) Contact angles for the polymer surface before and after re-initiation of the polymerization with a fluorinated monomer. (B) Profilometric analysis of the second layer formed by irradiation through a mask. Reprinted with permission from Telitel et al. [110]. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</figcaption></figure>

However, as a drawback, MOFs were not soluble within the resin, resulting in a heterogenous
catalysis. Among the MOF series, MIL53 and MIL88A were the most efficient photoinitiators, with a
final monomer conversion of 58% and 53% being respectively obtained for the FRPCP of epoxides with
the three-component MIL/Ph2I+/NVK (0.2%/2%/3%, w/w/w) system upon irradiation for 400 s under
air with a LED at 405 nm (see Figure 26).

<figure><img src="image_37.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 26.** Chemical structures of the different metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) used as photocatalysts of polymerization under visible light, and the organic linkers used in these structures.</figcaption></figure>

Specifically, **MIL53** and **MIL88A** are characterized by flexible structures capable to reversibly modify their pore size. While getting a deeper insight into the photocatalytic activity of the different MOFs, the iron content, the size of the pores, or the particles size were not determined as strongly influencing the catalytic activity. The main factor influencing the photoinitiating abilities of MOFs was determined as being the organic part (higher final conversions are obtained with flexible diacids than aromatic diacids) and the presence of hydroxy-bridging groups. Concerning this last factor, this trend is consistent with previous results reported in the literature [150].
As shown in this review, numerous photocatalysts have been designed for polymerization processes carried out at 405 nm. Interest for this specific wavelength is supported by the fact that this is presently the wavelength under use in 3D printers [151,152]. However, as far as the light penetration is concerned, polymerization at a long wavelength is of higher interest than 405 nm simply due to the problem of light penetration inside the resin. Indeed, if the light penetration is typically 1 mm at 405 nm, it can reach 5 cm at 800 nm (see Figure 27) [22]. Therefore, from an industrial point of view, a thicker layer can be polymerized in once, possibly addressing the low polymerization peed of 3D-printers. Additionally, resins with high filler contents can also be polymerized, which is not possible with photocurable resins activatable at 405 nm. Therefore, polymerization in the near-infrared region (NIR) region paves the way towards the fabrication of composites by photopolymerization.

<figure><img src="image_38.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 27.** Light penetration inside a photocurable resin. Adapted with permission from Bonardi et al. [22]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.</figcaption></figure>

Concerning iron complexes, ferrocene which is one of the simplest metallocene comprising an iron (II) cation sandwiched between two cyclopentadienyl moieties was notably used in 2019 for the design of a series of push-pull dyes capable of initiating a polymerization in the near-infrared region (NIR) [153]. A series of nine dyes, namely **Fe-23-Fe-31**, was examined for photopolymerization carried out at 405 and 785 nm (see Figure 28). NIR dyes based on ferrocene have been extensively studied in the literature due to the reversibility of the oxidation process centered on the ferrocene moiety [154].

<figure><img src="image_39.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 28.** Chemical structures of the different ferrocene-based dyes used as photocatalysts of polymerization under near-infrared region (NIR) light.</figcaption></figure>
From a synthetic point of view, push-pull chromophores are interesting compounds as these structures can be easily synthesized in one step, by means of a Knoevenagel reaction. By opposing ferrocene-carboxaldehyde with one equivalent of the appropriate electron acceptor in the presence of a catalytic amount of piperidine, the dyes can be synthesized. Using this procedure, **Fe-26-Fe31** could be obtained in high yields, ranging from 89% to 98% (see Scheme 8). The lower reaction yield for **Fe-31** (89% yield) can be confidently assigned to the steric hindrance generated by the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl group of the ferrocene donor.

<figure><img src="image_40.png" /></figure>

<table><caption>**Scheme 8.** Synthetic route to **Fe-2-Fe-31**.</caption><thead><tr><th>Compounds</th><th>Fe-26</th><th>Fe-27</th><th>Fe-28</th><th>Fe-29</th><th>Fe-30</th><th>Fe-31</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Reaction yield</td><td>98%</td><td>98%</td><td>95%</td><td>96%</td><td>98%</td><td>89%</td></tr></tbody></table>

In this series, the most red-shifted absorption was found for **Fe-30** so that its photoinitiating ability at 785 nm was examined. While using the three-component photoinitiating systems **Fe-30**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/2-dppba (0.2%/2%/1.5%, w/w/w) or **Fe-30**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/DMABA (0.2%/2%/1.5%, w/w/w), where 2-dppba stands for 2-diphenylphosphinobenzoic acid and DMABA for 3-(dimethylamino) benzyl alcohol, final monomer conversions of 52% could be obtained for the FRP of BisGMA/TEGDMA (30/70 wt%) blend with the two systems after irradiation with a LED at 785 nm for 400 s under air. By increasing the lamp intensity from 400 mW/cm² to 2.55 W/cm², the final conversion could be increased up to 85% after only 200 s with the three-component system **Fe-30**/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺/DMABA (0.2%/2%/1.5%, w/w/w). Dependence of the monomer conversion on the light intensity is clearly evidenced. Parallel to photopolymerization, **Fe-30** was demonstrated to be capable of initiating a redox polymerization (i.e., without light) using the three-component system **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS (0.1%/1.5%/2%, w/w/w) where APS stands for ammonium persulfate. In this case, a second resin was used, composed of a methacrylate mixture containing 33.3 wt% of 1,4-butanediol-dimethacrylate (1,4-BDMA), 33.3 wt% of hydroxypropylmethacrylate (HPMA), and 33.3 wt% of urethane-dimethacrylate (UDMA) (see Figure 29).

To monitor the progress of the polymerization reaction, optical pyrometric measurements were done, as the reaction is exothermic (see Figure 30a). Depending on the ferrocene derivatives, a reaction temperature ranging between 35 and 40 °C was found. However, the reaction was slow, requiring 600 s with **Fe-26** and 1200 s for **Fe-30**. The ability of catalysts to be used in both redox and photoredox polymerization is unusual. The two polymerization modes possess their own advantages. As shown in Figure 30b, in the case of a photopolymerization reaction carried out under air, the surface is more polymerized than the bottom part of the sample due to the problem of light penetration inside the resin. Only the surface, which is exposed to light, can polymerize efficiently. A spatial control is obtained, where only the surface exposed to light polymerizes. However, for redox polymerization, the surface is less polymerized than the bottom part due to oxygen inhibition. No spatial control was obtained. The whole sample was polymerized due to the diffusion of radicals. By combining the two polymerization modes, the global monomer conversion can be significantly improved and photoacceleration of the polymerization process is also possible "on demand".
<figure><img src="image_41.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 29.** Chemical structures of the different monomers and additives used with Fe-30 for redox and photoactivated redox polymerization under NIR light.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_42.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 30.** (A) Monitoring the polymerization reaction of a methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) by optical pyrometric measurements (e) **Fe-26**/2-dppba/APS (f) **Fe-28**/2-dppba/APS (g) **Fe-27**/2-dppba/APS; (h) **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS (0.1%/1.5%/2%, w/w/w). Adapted from [153] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Specificities of photopolymerization, redox polymerization, and photoactivated redox polymerization. Adapted with permission from Garra et al. [102]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (C) (a) polymerization with the three-component system **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS (0.1%/1.5%/2%, w/w/w) (without light), (b) photoactivated redox polymerization with the four-component system **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS (0.1%/1.5%/2%, w/w/w) (+1.0 wt% (*tert*-Bu)Ph<sub>2</sub>I<sup>+</sup>) under irradiation with a LED at 785 nm. Adapted from [153] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.</figcaption></figure>
By applying this concept of photoactivated redox polymerization and by irradiation of a four-component system **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ (0.1%/1.5%/2%/1%, w/w/w/w), a two-fold reduction of the reaction time was obtained, associated with a major increase of the reaction temperature (+ 20 °C), demonstrating the efficiency of the photoactivation and the production of numerous radicals (see Figure 30c). Notably, the remarkable efficiency of the photoactivated redox polymerization can confidently assigned to the regeneration of **Fe-30** during the oxidative cycle but also to the faster photoinitiated process relative to the redox process (see Scheme 9).

<figure><img src="image_43.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 9.** The two catalytic cycles involved in the photoactivated redox polymerization of a methacrylate mixture (1,4-BDMA/HPMA/UDMA) using **Fe-30** as the catalyst in the four-component system **Fe-30**/2-dppba/APS/(tert-Bu)Ph₂I⁺ (0.1%/1.5%/2%/1%, w/w/w/w).</figcaption></figure>

In fact, this work on ferrocene photocatalysts is described in the continuation of a previous work concerning the photoactivation of redox polymerizations with light using copper complexes (see previous section on copper complexes).

### 3. Conclusions

In this review, approximately 70 metal-based photocatalysts of polymerization have been reviewed. While the photoinitiating performances have governed the initial works on platinum, ruthenium, or iridium complexes, rapidly, environmental and toxicity concerns have taken precedence over performance. At present, copper or iron complexes are clearly less efficient than iridium complexes, high monomer conversions being obtained in laminate, whereas a similar performance was previously obtained with iridium complexes under air. Besides, by chemical engineering, TADF photocatalysts based on copper or iron photocatalysts specifically designed for photoassisted redox polymerization have greatly improved the final monomer conversions. At present, some challenges remain concerning photopolymerization. Notably, the polymerization at long wavelength is only scarcely studied, even if it paves the way towards photocomposites. Parallel to this, controlled photopolymerization is still far behind that of the thermally controlled polymerization. These two challenges will certainly be addressed in the forthcoming years.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, F.D.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.; writing—review and editing, F.D.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The author declares no conflict of interest.

### References

1. Hoffmann, N. Electron and hydrogen transfer in organic photochemical reactions. *J. Phys. Org. Chem.* **2015**, *28*, 121–136. [CrossRef]

2. Oelgemöller, M.; Hoffmann, N. Studies in organic and physical photochemistry—an interdisciplinary approach. *Org. Biomol. Chem.* **2016**, *14*, 7392–7442. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Wang, P.; Lu, W.; Devalankar, D.; Ding, Z. Photochemical formation and cleavage of C–N bond. *Org. Lett.* **2015**, *17*, 170–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Ichinose, N.; Mizuno, K.; Otsuji, Y.; Caldwell, R.A.; Helms, A.M. Photochemical C–C bond cleavage of 1,2-diarylcyclopropanes bearing an acetylphenyl group. generation and observation of triplet 1,3-biradicals. *J. Org. Chem.* **1998**, *63*, 3176–3184. [CrossRef]

5. Hoffmann, N. Photochemical reactions as key steps in organic synthesis. *Chem. Rev.* **2008**, *108*, 1052–1103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Romero, N.A.; Nicewicz, D.A. Organic photoredox catalysis. *Chem. Rev.* **2016**, *116*, 10075–10166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Shaw, M.H.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D.W.C. Photoredox catalysis in organic chemistry. *J. Org. Chem.* **2016**, *81*, 6898–6926. [CrossRef]

8. Prier, C.K.; Rankic, D.A.; MacMillan, D.W.C. Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: Applications in organic synthesis. *Chem. Rev.* **2013**, *113*, 5322–5323. [CrossRef]

9. Narayanama, J.M.R.; Stephenson, C.R.J. Visible light photoredox catalysis: Applications in organic synthesis. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2011**, *40*, 102–113. [CrossRef]

10. Bogdos, M.K.; Pinard, E.; Murphy, J.A. Applications of organocatalysed visible-light photoredox reactions for medicinal chemistry. *Beilstein J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *14*, 2035–2064. [CrossRef]

11. Parasram, M.; Gevorgyan, V. Visible light-induced transition metal-catalyzed transformations: Beyond conventional photosensitizers. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2017**, *46*, 6227–6240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Islamova, R.M.; Dobrynin, M.V.; Vlasov, A.V.; Eremina, A.A.; Kinzhalov, M.A.; Kolesnikov, I.E.; Zolotarev, A.A.; Masloborodova, E.A.; Luzyanin, K.V. Iridium (III)-catalysed cross-linking of polysiloxanes leading to the thermally resistant luminescent silicone rubbers. *Catal. Sci. Technol.* **2017**, *7*, 5843–5846. [CrossRef]

13. Gee, J.C.; Fuller, B.A.; Lockett, H.M.; Sedghi, G.; Robertson, C.M.; Luzyanin, K.V. Visible light accelerated hydrosilylation of alkynes using platinum-[acyclic diaminocarbene] photocatalysts. *Chem. Commun.* **2018**, *54*, 9450–9453. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. Ischay, M.; Anzovino, M.E.; Du, J.; Yoon, T.P. Efficient visible light photocatalysis of [2 + 2] enone cycloadditions. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2008**, *130*, 12886–12887. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Nicewicz, D.A.; MacMillan, D.W.C. Merging photoredox catalysis with organocatalysis: The direct asymmetric alkylation of aldehydes. *Science* **2008**, *322*, 77–80. [CrossRef]

16. Narayanam, J.M.R.; Tucker, J.W.; Stephenson, C.R.J. Electron-transfer photoredox catalysis: Development of a tin-free reductive dehalogenation reaction. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2009**, *131*, 8756–8757. [CrossRef]

17. Oelgemöller, M. Solar Photochemical synthesis: From the beginnings of organic photochemistry to the solar manufacturing of commodity chemicals. *Chem. Rev.* **2016**, *116*, 9664–9682. [CrossRef]

18. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Doran, S.; Yagci, Y. Photoinduced electron transfer reactions for macromolecular syntheses. *Chem. Rev.* **2016**, *116*, 10212–10275. [CrossRef]

19. Chen, M.; Zhong, M.; Johnson, J.A. Light-controlled radical polymerization: Mechanisms, methods, and applications. *Chem. Rev.* **2016**, *116*, 10167–10211. [CrossRef]

20. Poelma, J.E.; Fors, B.P.; Meyers, G.F.; Kramer, J.W.; Hawker, C.J. Fabrication of complex three-dimensional polymer brush nanostructures through light-mediated living radical polymerization. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2013**, *52*, 6844–6848. [CrossRef]

21. Anastasaki, A.; Nikolaou, V.; Brandford-Adams, F.; Nurumbetov, G.; Zhang, Q.; Clarkson, G.J.; Fox, D.J.; Wilson, P.; Kempe, K.; Haddleton, D.M. Photo-induced living radical polymerization of acrylates utilizing a discrete copper(II)-formate complex. *Chem. Commun.* **2015**, *51*, 5626–5629. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Bonardi, A.H.; Dumur, F.; Grant, T.M.; Noirbent, G.; Gigmes, D.; Lessard, B.H.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. High Performance Near-infrared (NIR) photoinitiating systems operating under low light intensity and in the presence of oxygen. *Macromolecules* **2018**, *51*, 1314–1324. [CrossRef]

23. Lalevée, J.; Blanchard, N.; Tehfe, M.A.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P. Green bulb light source induced epoxy cationic polymerization under air using tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) and silyl radicals. *Macromolecules* **2010**, *43*, 10191–10195. [CrossRef]

24. Ligon, S.C.; Husár, B.; Wutzel, H.; Holman, R.; Liska, R. Strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization. *Chem. Rev.* **2014**, *114*, 557–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Bonardi, A.H.; Dumur, F.; Noirbent, G.; Lalevée, J.; Gigmes, D. Organometallic vs organic photoredox catalysts for photocuring reactions in the visible region. *Beilstein J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *14*, 3025–3046. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26. Yoon, T.P.; Ischay, M.A.; Du, J. Visible light photocatalysis as a greener approach to photochemical synthesis. *Nat. Chem.* **2010**, *2*, 527–532. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Nicewicz, D.A.; Nguyen, T.M. Recent Applications of Organic Dyes as Photoredox Catalysts in Organic Synthesis. *ACS Catal.* **2014**, *4*, 355–360. [CrossRef]

28. Tucker, J.W.; Stephenson, C.R.J. Shining light on photoredox catalysis: Theory and synthetic applications. *J. Org. Chem.* **2012**, *77*, 1617–1622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29. Chatgilialoglu, C. *Organosilanes in Radical Chemistry*; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2004.

30. Lalevée, J.; Blanchard, N.; Tehfe, M.A.; Peter, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P. Household LED irradiation under air: Cationic polymerization using iridium or ruthenium complex photocatalysts. *Polym. Bull.* **2012**, *68*, 341–347. [CrossRef]

31. Tehfe, M.A.; Lalevée, J.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P. Green chemistry: Sunlight-induced cationic polymerization of renewable epoxy monomers under air. *Macromolecules* **2010**, *43*, 1364–1370. [CrossRef]

32. Tehfe, M.A.; Lalevée, J.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P. Combination of transition metal carbonyls and silanes: New photoinitiating systems. *J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem.* **2010**, *48*, 1830–1837. [CrossRef]

33. Tehfe, M.A.; Ma, L.; Graff, B.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P.; Zhao, J.; Lalevée, J. Cyclometallated Pt(II) complexes in visible-light photoredox catalysis: New polymerization initiating systems. *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2012**, *213*, 2282–2286. [CrossRef]

34. Crivello, J.V. Silane reduction of onium salts. *Appl. Organomet. Chem.* **2010**, *24*, 169–178. [CrossRef]

35. Bamford, C.H.; Mullik, S.U.; Puddephatt, R.J. Photo-initiation of free-radical polymerization by dimethyl-(2,2'-bipyridyl)platinum(II)⁺ tetrafluoroethylene. *J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.* **1975**, *71*, 2213–2225. [CrossRef]

36. Ziessel, R.; Diring, S.; Retailleau, P. Terpyridine-platinum(II) acetylide complexes bearing pendent coordination units. *Dalton Trans.* **2006**, 3285–3329. [CrossRef]

37. Li, K.; Ming Tong, G.S.; Wan, Q.; Cheng, G.; Tong, W.Y.; Ang, W.H.; Kwong, W.L.; Che, C.M. Highly phosphorescent platinum (II) emitters: photophysics, materials and biological applications. *Chem. Sci.* **2016**, *7*, 1653–1673. [CrossRef]

38. Kappaun, S.; Slugovc, C.; List, E.J.W. Phosphorescent organic light-emitting devices: Working principle and iridium-based emitter materials. *Int. J. Mol. Sci.* **2008**, *9*, 1527–1547. [CrossRef]

39. Tehfe, M.A.; Lepeltier, M.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Structural effects in the iridium complex series: Photoredox catalysis and photoinitiation of polymerization reactions under visible lights. *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2017**, *218*, 1700192. [CrossRef]

40. Aspley, C.J.; Williams, J.A.G. Palladium-catalysed cross-coupling reactions of ruthenium bis-terpyridyl complexes: Strategies for the incorporation and exploitation of boronic acid functionality. *New J. Chem.* **2001**, *25*, 1136–1147. [CrossRef]

41. Arm, K.J.; Williams, J.A.G. Boronic acid-substituted metal complexes: Versatile building blocks for the synthesis of multimetallic assemblies. *Chem. Commun.* **2005**, *2*, 230–232. [CrossRef]

42. Arm, K.J.; Williams, J.A.G. A cross-coupling strategy for the synthesis of dimetallic assemblies containing mixed bipyridine-terpyridine bridging ligands: Luminescence and energy transfer properties. *Dalton Trans.* **2006**, *18*, 2172–2174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Leslie, W.; Batsanov, A.S.; Howard, J.A.K.; Williams, J.A.G. Cross-couplings in the elaboration of luminescent bis-terpyridyl iridium complexes: The effect of extended or inhibited conjugation on emission. *Dalton Trans.* **2004**, *4*, 623–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Whittle, V.L.; Williams, J.A.G. A new class of iridium complexes suitable for stepwise incorporation into linear assemblies: Synthesis, electrochemistry, and luminescence. *Inorg. Chem.* **2008**, *47*, 6596–6607. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

45. Williams, J.A.G.; Wilkinson, A.J.; Whittle, V.L. Light-emitting iridium complexes with tridentate ligands. *Dalton Trans.* **2008**, *16*, 2081–2099. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

46. Whittle, V.L.; Williams, J.A.G. Cyclometallated, bis-terdentate iridium complexes as linearly expandable cores for the construction of multimetallic assemblies. *Dalton Trans.* **2009**, *20*, 3929–3940. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Tang, H.; Wei, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Yang, W.; Cao, Y. Novel heteroleptic iridium(III) complexes with a 2-(1H-pyrazol-5-yl)pyridine derivative containing a carbazole group as ancillary ligand: Synthesis and application for polymer light-emitting diodes. *Synth. Met.* **2014**, *187*, 209–216. [CrossRef]

48. Lepeltier, M.; Dumur, F.; Marrot, J.; Contal, E.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D.; Mayer, C.R. Unprecedented combination of regioselective hydrodefluorination and ligand exchange reaction during the syntheses of tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes. *Dalton Trans.* **2013**, *42*, 4479–4486. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

49. Lepeltier, M.; Dumur, F.; Graff, B.; Xiao, P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J.; Mayer, C.R. Tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes with three different ligands: A new example with 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridine-based complex. *Helv. Chim. Acta* **2014**, *97*, 939–956. [CrossRef]

50. Dumur, F.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D. Iridium (III) complexes as promising emitters for solid-state Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells (LECs). *Int. J. Nanotechnol.* **2012**, *9*, 377–395. [CrossRef]

51. Dumur, F.; Yuskevitch, Y.; Wantz, G.; Mayer, C.R.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D. Light-emitting electrochemical cells based on a solution-processed multilayered device and an anionic iridium (III) complex. *Synth. Met.* **2013**, *177*, 100–104. [CrossRef]

52. Dumur, F.; Nasr, G.; Wantz, G.; Mayer, C.R.; Dumas, E.; Guerlin, A.; Miomandre, F.; Clavier, G.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D. Cationic iridium complex for the design of soft salt-based phosphorescent OLEDs and color-tunable light-emitting electrochemical cells. *Org. Electron.* **2011**, *12*, 1683–1694. [CrossRef]

53. Nasr, G.; Guerlin, A.; Dumur, F.; Beouch, L.; Dumas, E.; Clavier, G.; Miomandre, F.; Goubard, F.; Gigmes, D.; Bertin, D.; et al. Iridium(III) soft salts from dinuclear cationic and mononuclear anionic complexes for OLED devices. *Chem. Commun.* **2011**, *47*, 10698–10700. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54. Lepeltier, M.; Graff, B.; Lalevée, J.; Wantz, G.; Ibrahim-Ouali, M.; Gigmes, D.; Dumur, F. Heteroleptic iridium (III) complexes with three different ligands: Unusual triplet emitters for light-emitting electrochemical cells. *Org. Electron.* **2016**, *37*, 24–34. [CrossRef]

55. Lepeltier, M.; Appaix, F.; Liao, Y.Y.; Dumur, F.; Marrot, J.; Le Bahers, T.; Andraud, C.; Monnereau, C. Carbazole-substituted iridium complex as a solid state emitter for two-photon intravital imaging. *Inorg. Chem.* **2016**, *55*, 9586–9595. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56. Lalevée, J.; Peter, M.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Blanchard, N.; Tehfe, M.A.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P. Subtle ligand effects in oxidative photocatalysis with iridium complexes: Application to photopolymerization. *Chem. Eur. J.* **2011**, *17*, 15027–15031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

57. Telitel, S.; Dumur, F.; Lepeltier, M.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Photoredox process induced polymerization reactions: Iridium complexes for panchromatic photoinitiating systems. *Comptes Rendus Chim.* **2016**, *19*, 71–78. [CrossRef]

58. Chen, Y.; Hu, Z.; Xu, D.; Yu, Y.; Tang, X.; Guo, H. Studies of free radical polymerization initiated by visible light photoredox catalysis. *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2015**, *216*, 1055–1060. [CrossRef]

59. Zhang, G.; Song, I.Y.; Ahn, K.H.; Park, T.; Choi, W. Free radical polymerization initiated and controlled by visible light photocatalysis at ambient temperature. *Macromolecules* **2011**, *44*, 7594–7599. [CrossRef]

60. Lalevée, J.; Tehfe, M.A.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Blanchard, N.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P. Iridium photocatalysts in free radical photopolymerization under visible lights. *ACS Macro Lett.* **2012**, *1*, 286–290. [CrossRef]

61. Lalevée, J.; Blanchard, N.; Tehfe, M.A.; Peter, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Fouassier, J.P. A novel photopolymerization initiating system based on an iridium complex photocatalyst. *Macromol. Rapid Commun.* **2011**, *32*, 917–920. [CrossRef]

62. Flamigni, L.; Barbieri, A.; Sabatini, C.; Ventura, B.; Barigelletti, F. Photochemistry and photophysics of coordination compounds: Iridium. *Top. Curr. Chem.* **2007**, *281*, 143–203. [CrossRef]

63. Okada, S.; Okinaka, K.; Iwawaki, H.; Furugori, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Mukaide, T.; Kamatani, J.; Igawa, S.; Tsuboyama, A.; Takiguchi, T.; et al. Substituent effects of iridium complexes for highly efficient red OLEDs. *Dalton Trans.* **2005**, *9*, 1583–1590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

64. Nonoyama, M. Benzo[h]quinolin-10-yl-N Iridium(III) Complexes. *Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.* **1974**, *47*, 767–768. [CrossRef]

65. Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Shi, C.; Tao, P.; Zhao, Q.; Yuan, A. An oxygen-bridged triarylamine polycyclic unit based tris-cyclometalated heteroleptic iridium(III) complex: Correlation between the structure and photophysical properties. *Dalton Trans.* **2019**, *48*, 4596–4601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66. Tamayo, A.B.; Alleyne, B.D.; Djurovich, P.I.; Lamansky, S.; Tsyba, I.; Ho, N.N.; Bau, R.; Thompson, M.E. Synthesis and characterization of facial and meridional tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2003**, *125*, 7377–7387. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

67. Edkins, R.M.; Wriglesworth, A.; Fucke, K.; Bettington, S.L.; Beeby, A. The synthesis and photophysics of tris-heteroleptic cyclometalated iridium complexes. *Dalton Trans.* **2011**, *40*, 9672–9678. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

68. Yang, H.; Meng, G.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z. The photoluminescent properties of new cationic iridium (III) complexes using different anions and their applications in white light-emitting diodes. *Materials* **2015**, *8*, 6105–6116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

69. Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Kinetics of fluorescence quenching by electron and H.-atom transfer. *Isr. J. Chem.* **1970**, *8*, 259–271. [CrossRef]

70. Lalevée, J.; Tehfe, M.A.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Graff, B.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Blanchard, N.; Fouassier, J.P. Photoredox catalysis for polymerization reactions. *Chimia* **2012**, *66*, 439–441. [CrossRef]

71. Lalevée, J.; Telitel, S.; Xiao, P.; Lepeltier, M.; Dumur, F.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P. Metal and metal-free photocatalysts: Mechanistic approach and application as photoinitiators of photopolymerization. *Beilstein J. Org. Chem.* **2014**, *10*, 863–876. [CrossRef]

72. Lalevée, J.; Dumur, F.; Mayer, C.R.; Gigmes, D.; Nasr, G.; Tehfe, M.A.; Telitel, S.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Graff, B.; Fouassier, J.P. Photopolymerization of N-Vinylcarbazole Using Visible-Light Harvesting Iridium Complexes as Photoinitiators. *Macromolecules* **2012**, *45*, 4134–4141. [CrossRef]

73. Dumur, F.; Beouch, L.; Tehfe, M.A.; Contal, E.; Lepeltier, M.; Wantz, G.; Graff, B.; Goubard, F.; Mayer, C.R.; Lalevée, J.; et al. Low-cost zinc complexes for white organic light-emitting devices. *Thin Solid Films* **2014**, *564*, 351–360. [CrossRef]

74. Dumur, F.; Contal, E.; Wantz, G.; Gigmes, D. Photoluminescence of zinc complexes: Easily tunable optical properties by variation of the bridge between the imido groups of schiff base ligands. *Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.* **2014**, *25*, 4186–4198. [CrossRef]

75. Tehfe, M.A.; Dumur, F.; Telitel, S.; Gigmes, D.; Contal, E.; Bertin, D.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Graff, B.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Zinc-based metal complexes as new photocatalysts in polymerization initiating systems. *Eur. Polym. J.* **2013**, *49*, 1040–1049. [CrossRef]

76. Poli, R.; Allan, L.E.N.; Shaver, M.P. Iron-mediated reversible deactivation controlled radical polymerization. *Prog. Polym. Sci.* **2014**, *39*, 1827–1845. [CrossRef]

77. Wang, J.S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled/"living" radical polymerization. atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **1995**, *117*, 5614–5615. [CrossRef]

78. Kamigaito, M.; Ando, T.; Sawamoto, M. Metal-catalyzed living radical polymerization. *Chem. Rev.* **2001**, *101*, 3689–3746. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

79. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Nechab, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Graff, B.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Stable copper acetylacetonate-based oxidizing agents in redox (NIR photoactivated) polymerization: An opportunity for the one pot grafting from approach and an example on a 3D printed object. *Polym. Chem.* **2018**, *9*, 2173–2182. [CrossRef]

80. Garra, P.; Carré, M.; Dumur, F.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper-based (photo)redox initiating systems as highly efficient systems for interpenetrating polymer network preparation. *Macromolecules* **2018**, *51*, 679–688. [CrossRef]

81. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Mechanosynthesis of a Copper complex for redox initiating systems with a unique near infrared light activation. *J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem.* **2017**, *55*, 3646–3655. [CrossRef]

82. Garra, P.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Graff, B.; Dumur, F.; Monnier, V.; Dietlin, C.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Metal Acetylacetonate-Bidentate Ligand Interaction (MABLI) as highly efficient free radical generating systems for polymer synthesis. *Polym. Chem.* **2018**, *9*, 1371–1378. [CrossRef]

83. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Nechab, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Gree, S.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Metal acetylacetonate-bidentate ligand interaction (mabli) (photo)activated polymerization: Toward high performance amine-free, peroxide-free redox radical (photo)initiating systems. *Macromolecules* **2018**, *51*, 2706–2715. [CrossRef]
84. Xiao, P.; Dumur, F.; Zhang, J.; Fouassier, J.P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J. Copper Complexes in Radical Photoinitiating Systems: Applications to Free Radical and Cationic Polymerization upon Visible LEDs. *Macromolecules* **2014**, *47*, 3837–3844. [CrossRef]

85. Al Mousawi, A.; Kermagoret, A.; Versace, D.L.; Toufaily, J.; Hamieh, T.; Graff, B.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper photoredox catalysts for polymerization upon near UV or visible light: Structure/reactivity/efficiency relationships and use in LED projector 3D printing resins. *Polym. Chem.* **2017**, *8*, 568–580. [CrossRef]

86. Xiao, P.; Dumur, F.; Zhang, J.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper complexes: The effect of ligands on their photoin initiation efficiencies in radical polymerization reactions under visible light. *Polym. Chem.* **2014**, *5*, 6350–6357. [CrossRef]

87. Yang, Q.; Balverde, S.; Dumur, F.; Lalevée, J.; Poly, J. Synergetic effect of the epoxide functional groups in the photocatalyzed atom transfer radical copolymerization of glycidyl methacrylate. *Polym. Chem.* **2016**, *7*, 6084–6093. [CrossRef]

88. Dumur, F. Recent advances in organic light-emitting devices comprising copper complexes: A realistic approach for low-cost and highly emissive devices? *Org. Electron.* **2015**, *21*, 27–39. [CrossRef]

89. Zhang, Q.; Komino, T.; Huang, S.; Matsunami, S.; Goushi, K.; Adachi, C. Triplet exciton confinement in green organic light-emitting diodes containing luminescent charge-transfer cu (i) complexes. *Adv. Funct. Mater.* **2012**, *22*, 2327–2336. [CrossRef]

90. Uoyama, H.; Goushi, K.; Shizu, K.; Nomura, H.; Adachi, C. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. *Nature* **2012**, *492*, 234–238. [CrossRef]

91. Parker, C.A.; Hatchard, C.G. Triplet-singlet emission in fluid solutions. Phosphorescence of eosin. *Trans. Faraday Soc.* **1961**, *57*, 1894–1904. [CrossRef]

92. Bui, T.T.; Goubard, F.; Ibrahim-Ouali, M.; Gigmes, D.; Dumur, F. Recent advances on organic blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters for organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). *Beilstein J. Org. Chem.* **2018**, *14*, 282–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

93. Bouzrati-Zerelli, M.; Noirbent, G.; Goubard, G.; Bui, T.T.; Villotte, S.; Dietlin, C.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Dumur, F.; et al. A novel class of photoinitiators with a thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) property. *New J. Chem.* **2018**, *42*, 8261–8270. [CrossRef]

94. Xiao, P.; Lalevée, J.; Zhao, J.; Stenzel, M.H. N-Vinylcarbazole as Versatile Photoinaddimer of Photopolymerization under Household UV LED Bulb (392 nm). *Macromol. Rapid Commun.* **2015**, *36*, 1675–1680. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

95. Lalevée, J.; Xiao, P.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D. Light induced free radical and/or cationic photopolymerization method. Patent WO2015132295 A1, 2015.

96. Mokbel, H.; Anderson, D.; Plenderleith, R.; Dietlin, C.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper photoredox catalyst “G1”: A new high performance photoinitiator for near-UV and visible LEDs. *J. Polym. Chem.* **2017**, *8*, 5580–5592. [CrossRef]

97. Mokbel, H.; Anderson, D.; Plenderleith, R.; Dietlin, C.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Simultaneous initiation of radical and cationic polymerization reactions using the “G1” copper complex as photoredox catalyst: Applications of free radical/cationic hybrid photopolymerization in the composites and 3D printing fields. *Prog. Org. Coat.* **2019**, *132*, 50–61. [CrossRef]

98. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Mokbel, H.; Monnier, V.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. New synthetic route to an highly efficient photoredox catalyst by mechanosynthesis. *ACS Omega* **2018**, *3*, 10938–10944. [CrossRef]

99. Mokbel, H.; Toufaily, J.; Hamieh, T.; Dumur, F.; Campolo, D.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Ortyl, J.; Lalevée, J. Specific cationic photoinitiators for near UV and visible LEDs: Iodonium versus ferrocenium structures. *J. Appl. Polym. Sci.* **2015**, *42759*. [CrossRef]

100. Garra, P.; Dietlin, C.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Photopolymerization processes of thick films and in shadow areas: A review for the access to composites. *Polym. Chem.* **2017**, *8*, 7088–7101. [CrossRef]

101. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Al Mousawi, A.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper (photo)redox catalyst for radical photopolymerization in shadowed areas and access to thick and filled samples. *Macromolecules* **2017**, *50*, 3761–3771. [CrossRef]
102. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. A new highly efficient amine-free and peroxide-free redox system for free radical polymerization under air with possible light activation. *Macromolecules* **2016**, *49*, 6296–6309. [CrossRef]

103. Garra, P.; Dietlin, C.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Redox two-component initiated free radical and cationic polymerizations: Concepts, reactions and applications. *Prog. Polym. Sci.* **2019**, *94*, 33–56. [CrossRef]

104. Garra, P.; Dumur, F.; Nechab, M.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Graff, B.; Doronina, E.P.; Sidorkin, V.F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; et al. Peroxide-free and amine-free redox free radical polymerization: Metal acetylacetonates/stable carbonyl compounds for highly efficient synthesis of composites. *Macromolecules* **2018**, *51*, 6395–6404. [CrossRef]

105. Achilias, D.S.; Sideridou, I. Study of the effect of two BPO/amine initiation systems on the free-radical polymerization of MMA used in dental resins and bone cements. *J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem.* **2002**, *39*, 1435–1450. [CrossRef]

106. Garra, P.; Kermagoret, A.; Al Mousawi, A.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. New copper(I) complex based initiating systems in redox polymerization and comparison with the amine/benzoyl peroxide reference. *Polym. Chem.* **2017**, *8*, 4088–4097. [CrossRef]

107. Zhang, J.; Campolo, D.; Dumur, F.; Xiao, P.; Fouassier, J.P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J. Iron complexes as photoinitiators for radical and cationic polymerization through photoredox catalysis processes. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2015**, *53*, 42–49. [CrossRef]

108. Zhang, J.; Campolo, D.; Dumur, F.; Xiao, P.; Fouassier, J.P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J. Visible-light-sensitive photoredox catalysis by iron complexes: Applications in cationic and radical polymerization reactions. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2016**, *54*, 2247–2253. [CrossRef]

109. Zhang, J.; Campolo, D.; Dumur, F.; Xiao, P.; Fouassier, J.P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J. Iron complexes in visible-light-sensitive photoredox catalysis: Effect of ligands on their photoinitiation efficiencies. *ChemCatChem* **2016**, *8*, 2227–2233. [CrossRef]

110. Telitel, S.; Dumur, F.; Campolo, D.; Poly, J.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Iron complexes as potential photocatalysts for controlled radical photopolymerizations: A tool for modifications and patterning of surfaces. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2016**, *54*, 702–713. [CrossRef]

111. Xiao, P.; Zhang, J.; Campolo, D.; Dumur, F.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Copper and iron complexes as visible-light-sensitive photoinitiators of polymerization. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2015**, *53*, 2673–2684. [CrossRef]

112. Zhang, J.; Campolo, D.; Dumur, F.; Xiao, P.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. The carbazole-bound ferrocenium salt as a specific cationic photoinitiator upon near-UV and visible LEDs (365–405 nm). *Polym. Bull.* **2016**, *73*, 493–507. [CrossRef]

113. Lalevée, J.; Dumur, F.; Nechab, M.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P. Metal complex based photocatalyst systems: A quest for new possibilities and application to photopolymerization reactions. *Trends Photochem. Photobiol.* **2012**, *14*, 27–38. Available online: http://www.researchtrends.net/tia/article pdf.asp?in=0&vn=14&tid=15&aid=3797 (accessed on 5 August 2019).

114. Cunningham, A.F.; Desobry, V. *Radiation Curing in Polymer Science and Technology*; Fouassier, J.P., Rabek, J.F., Eds.; Elsevier: Barking, UK, 1993; Volume 2, pp. 323–374.

115. Anderson, J.; Hardgrove, E.; Cavitt, T.B.; Reeves, P. Photoinitiation of multifunctional acrylates via ferrocene-alkyl chloride charge transfer complexes. *J. Coat. Technol. Res.* **2007**, *4*, 43–49. [CrossRef]

116. Neumann, M.G.; Schmitt, C.C.; Rigoli, I.C. The photoinitiation of MMA polymerization in the presence of iron complexes. *J. Photochem. Photobiol. A* **2003**, *159*, 145–150. [CrossRef]

117. Burget, D.; Fouassier, J.P. Laser flash photolysis studies of the interaction of Rose Bengal with an iron arene complex. *J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.* **1998**, *94*, 1849–1854. [CrossRef]

118. Grotzinger, C.; Burget, D.; Jacques, P.; Fouassier, J.P. A novel and efficient xanthenic dye–organometallic ion-pair complex for photoinitiating polymerization. *J. Appl. Polym. Sci.* **2001**, *81*, 2368–2376. [CrossRef]

119. Fouassier, J.P.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Yamashita, K.; Imahashi, S. Visible light-induced polymerization reactions: The seven-role of the electron transfer process in the dye/iron arene complex/amine system. *J. Appl. Polym. Sci.* **1996**, *62*, 1877–1885. [CrossRef]

120. Fouassier, J.P.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Yamashita, K.; Imahashi, S. The role of the dye/iron arene complex/amine system as a photoinitiator for photopolymerization reactions. *Polymer* **1997**, *38*, 1415–1421. [CrossRef]
121. Fredin, L.A.; Papai, M.; Rozsalyi, E.; Vanko, G.; Warnmark, K.; Sundström, V.; Persson, P. Exceptional excited-state lifetime of an iron (II)-N-heterocyclic carbene complex explained. *J. Phys. Chem. Lett.* **2014**, *5*, 2066-2071. [CrossRef]

122. Al Mousawi, A.; Dumur, F.; Toufaily, J.; Hamieh, T.; Graff, B.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Carbazole scaffold based photoinitiators/photoredox catalysts for new LED projector 3D printing resins. *Macromolecules* **2017**, *50*, 2747-2758. [CrossRef]

123. Xiao, P.; Dumur, F.; Zhang, J.; Graff, B.; Gigmes, D.; Fouassier, J.P.; Lalevée, J. Amino and nitro substituted 2-amino-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-diones: As versatile photo-initiators of polymerization: From violet-blue LEDs absorption to a panchromatic behavior. *J. Polym. Chem.* **2015**, *6*, 1171-1179. [CrossRef]

124. Morris, J.; Telitel, S.; Fairfull-Smith, K.E.; Bottle, S.E.; Lalevée, J.; Clément, J.L.; Guillaneuf, Y.; Gigmes, D. Novel polymer synthesis methodologies using combinations of thermally- and photochemically-induced nitroxide mediated polymerization. *Polym. Chem.* **2015**, *6*, 754-763. [CrossRef]

125. Telitel, S.; Telitel, S.; Bosson, J.; Lalevée, J.; Clément, J.L.; Godfroy, M.; Fillaut, J.L.; Akdas-Kilig, H.; Guillaneuf, Y.; Gigmes, D.; et al. UV-induced micropatterning of complex functional surfaces by photopolymerization controlled by alkoxyamines. *Langmuir* **2015**, *31*, 10026-10036. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

126. Konkolewicz, D.; Schroeder, K.; Buback, J.; Bernhard, S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Visible light and sunlight photoinduced ATRP with ppm of Cu catalyst. *ACS Macro Lett.* **2012**, *1*, 1219-1223. [CrossRef]

127. Fors, B.P.; Hawker, C.J. Control of a living radical polymerization of methacrylates by light. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2012**, *51*, 8850-8853. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

128. Bansal, A.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, C.D.; Ray, S.S. Light-induced controlled free radical polymerization of methacrylates using iron-based photocatalyst in visible light. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2015**, *53*, 2739-2746. [CrossRef]

129. Tasdelen, M.A.; Uygun, M.; Yagci, Y. Photoinduced controlled radical polymerization. *Macromol. Rapid Commun.* **2011**, *32*, 58-62. [CrossRef]

130. Ishizu, K.; Kakinuma, H. Synthesis of nanocylinders consisting of graft block copolymers by the photo-induced ATRP technique. *J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem.* **2005**, *43*, 63-70. [CrossRef]

131. Kwak, Y.; Matyjaszewski, K. Photoirradiated atom transfer radical polymerization with an alkyl dithiocarbamate at ambient temperature. *Macromolecules* **2010**, *43*, 5180-5183. [CrossRef]

132. Tasdelen, M.A.; Uygun, M.; Yagci, Y. Photoinduced controlled radical polymerization in methanol. *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2010**, *211*, 2271-2275. [CrossRef]

133. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Tasdelen, M.A.; Kiskan, B.; Wang, X.; Antonietti, M.; Yagci, Y. Photochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization using polymeric semiconductor mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride. *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2014**, *215*, 675-681. [CrossRef]

134. Ribelli, T.G.; Konkolewicz, D.; Pan, X.; Matyjaszewski, K. Contribution of photochemistry to activator regeneration in ATRP. *Macromolecules* **2014**, *47*, 6316-6321. [CrossRef]

135. Chantasirichot, S.; Inoue, Y.; Ishihara, K. Photoinduced atom transfer radical polymerization in a polar solvent to synthesize a water-soluble poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) and its block-type copolymers. *Polymer* **2015**, *61*, 55-60. [CrossRef]

136. Doran, S.; Taskin, O.S.; Tasdelen, M.A.; Yagci, Y. Controlled photopolymerization and novel architectures. In *Dyes and Chromophores in Polymer Science*; Lalevee, J., Fouassier, J.P., Eds.; ISTE Wiley: London, UK, 2015.

137. Zhang, J.; Dumur, F.; Horcajada, P.; Livage, C.; Xiao, P.; Fouassier, J.P.; Gigmes, D.; Lalevée, J. Iron-based metal-organic frameworks (MOF) as photocatalysts for radical and cationic polymerizations under near UV and visible LEDs (385-405 nm). *Macromol. Chem. Phys.* **2016**, *217*, 2534-2540. [CrossRef]

138. Wang, C.C.; Li, J.R.; Lv, X.L.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Guo, G. Photocatalytic organic pollutants degradation in metal-organic frameworks. *Energy Environ. Sci.* **2014**, *7*, 2831-2867. [CrossRef]

139. Garcia, H.; Ferrer, B. *Metal Organic Frameworks as Heterogeneous Catalysts*; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2013; p. 365.

140. Wang, J.L.; Wang, C.; Lin, W. Metal-organic frameworks for light harvesting and photocatalysis. *ACS Catal.* **2012**, *2*, 2630-2640. [CrossRef]

141. Farrusseng, D.; Aguado, S.; Pinel, C. Metal-organic frameworks: Opportunities for catalysis. *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **2009**, *48*, 7502-7513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
142. Mueller, U.; Stoesser, M.; Ruppel, R.; Baum, E.; Bohres, E.; Sigl, M.; Lobree, L.; Yaghi, O.M.; Eddaoudi, M. Process for the Alkoxylation of Organic Compounds in the Presence of Novel Framework Materials. U.S. Patent US7279517 B2, 10 October 2001.

143. Laurier, K.G.M.; Vermoortele, F.; Ameloot, R.; De Vos, D.E.; Hofkens, J.; Roeffaers, M.B.J. Iron (III)-based metal-organic frameworks as visible light photocatalysts. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2013**, *135*, 14488–14491.
[CrossRef]

144. Lee, J.; Farha, O.K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K.A.; Nguyen, S.T.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2009**, *38*, 1450–1459. [CrossRef]

145. Czaja, A.U.; Trukhan, N.; Muller, U. Industrial applications of metal-organic frameworks. *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2009**, *38*, 1284–1293. [CrossRef]

146. Gu, Z.Y.; Park, J.; Raiff, A.; Wei, Z.; Zhou, H.C. Metal-organic frameworks as biomimetic catalysts. *ChemCatChem* **2014**, *6*, 67–75. [CrossRef]

147. Zhou, H.C.; Long, J.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Introduction to Metal–Organic Frameworks. *Chem. Rev.* **2012**, *112*, 673–674. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

148. Cirujano, F.G.; Leyva-Pérez, A.; Corma, A.; Llabrés i Xamena, F.X. MOFs as multifunctional catalysts: Synthesis of secondary arylamines, quinolines, pyrroles, and arylpyrrolidines over bifunctional MIL-101. *ChemCatChem* **2013**, *5*, 538–549. [CrossRef]

149. Zhao, Z.; Qian, L.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, G. Introduction of a Fe₃O₄ core enhances the photocatalytic activity of MIL-100(Fe) with tunable shell thickness in the presence of H₂O₂. *ChemCatChem* **2015**, *7*, 4148–4155. [CrossRef]

150. Ai, L.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Jiang, J. Iron terephthalate metal-organic framework: Revealing the effective activation of hydrogen peroxide for the degradation of organic dye under visible light irradiation. *J. Appl. Catal. B* **2014**, *148–149*, 191–200. [CrossRef]

151. Zhang, J.; Xiao, P. 3D printing of photopolymers. *Polym. Chem.* **2018**, *9*, 1530–1540. [CrossRef]

152. Bagheri, A.; Jin, J. Photopolymerization in 3D Printing. *ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.* **2019**, *1*, 593–611. [CrossRef]

153. Garra, P.; Brunel, D.; Noirbent, G.; Graff, B.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Dietlin, C.; Sidorkin, V.F.; Dumur, F.; Duché, D.; Gigmes, D.; et al. Ferrocene-based (photo)redox polymerization under long wavelengths. *Polym. Chem.* **2019**, *10*, 1431–1441. [CrossRef]

154. Brunel, D.; Noirbent, G.; Dumur, F. Ferrocene: An unrivaled electroactive building block for the design of push-pull dyes with near-infrared and infrared absorptions. *Dyes Pigment.* **2019**, *170*, 107611. [CrossRef]

<figure><img src="image_44.png" /></figure>

© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).