# Editorial: Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives

Vladimir Adrien, Marion Trousselard, Félix Schoeller

► To cite this version:

Vladimir Adrien, Marion Trousselard, Félix Schoeller. Editorial: Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 2026, Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives, 20, pp.1785574. 10.3389/fnint.2026.1785574. hal-05496048

HAL Id: hal-05496048

https://hal.science/hal-05496048v1

Submitted on 5 Feb 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED AND REVIEWED BY
Elizabeth B. Torres,
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,
United States

*CORRESPONDENCE

Vladimir Adrien

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

vladimir.adrien@aphp.fr

RECEIVED 11 January 2026

ACCEPTED 14 January 2026

PUBLISHED 02 February 2026

CITATION

Adrien V, Trousselard M and Schoeller F (2026) Editorial: Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives.

Front. Integr. Neurosci. 20:1785574.

doi: 10.3389/fnint.2026.1785574

COPYRIGHT

© 2026 Adrien, Trousselard and Schoeller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

# Editorial: Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives

Vladimir Adrien<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />*, Marion Trousselard<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="4" />,<fnref n="5" /> and Félix Schoeller⁶

KEYWORDS

agency, chronesthesia, dissociation, grounding, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychological trauma, psychomotor therapy, sensorimotor

## Editorial on the Research Topic

### Agency in posttraumatic stress disorder: theoretical approach and therapeutic perspectives

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a major public health challenge, affecting 3.9% of the world population (Koenen et al., 2017), with only a minority of patients achieving durable remission while many develop chronic, complex, or dissociative forms of PTSD despite evidence-based trauma-focused psychotherapies (Kessler et al., 1995; Steenkamp et al., 2015; Schnurr et al., 2022). Dominant therapeutic models emphasize fear extinction, emotional regulation, and cognitive restructuring. While these approaches are indispensable, they may insufficiently address a more fundamental disruption produced by trauma-related disruption: dissociation, understood as a collapse of grounding to reality, involving alterations in proprioception, interoception, chronesthesia, sense of body ownership and sense of agency. Reconsidering PTSD through the lens of agency offers a unifying framework that connects peritraumatic experience, dissociation, memory fragmentation, and symptom persistence.

## Why agency matters

Agency refers to the prereflective feeling of initiating and controlling one's actions and their consequences (Tsakiris et al., 2007; Haggard and Chambon, 2012). Although conceptually distinct, the sense of body ownership, that refers to the experience that one's body and experiences belong to oneself, and the sense of agency are deeply intertwined within multisensory and predictive processes integrating proprioception, interoception, motor intentions, and sensory feedback. Crucially, agency anchors the self as an *actor* in the world: it is through agency that perception, action, and meaning are dynamically coupled, within the past, present and future. Indeed, acting involves not only controlling one's actions in the present, but also anticipating their future consequences and embedding them within an autobiographical contin.

<footnote n="1">¹AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Department of Child, Adolescent and General Psychiatry, Bobigny, France,</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire Éducatives et Promotion de la Santé (UR 3412), Bobigny, France,</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France,</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴INSPIRE, Inserm UMR 1319, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France,</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Ecole des Psychologues Praticiens, Paris, France,</footnote>
Psychiatric research has extensively examined alterations of body ownership and control, particularly in dissociation. By contrast, agency has received comparatively little attention in trauma research, despite growing evidence that it is profoundly altered in PTSD and its dissociative subtypes (Rabellino et al., 2018; Ataria, 2015).

## Trauma as a breakdown of agency

From an enactive and predictive-processing perspective, a traumatic event (TE) overwhelms the individual's capacity to act meaningfully on the environment. The TE exceeds available sensorimotor and cognitive models, leaving no reliable predictions to guide perception or action (Friston, 2017; Linson and Friston, 2019). Neurobiologically, this corresponds to hyperactivation of threat-detection systems alongside reduced prefrontal and hippocampal regulation (Shin et al., 2005; Lanius et al., 2010; Akiki et al., 2017).

Clinically, this collapse of agency is experienced as helplessness, freezing, or tonic immobility, hallmark features of peritraumatic distress (Bracha, 2004). These states reflect not merely fear, but a failure of agency—an inability to initiate or modulate action in response to threat. Peritraumatic dissociation may then emerge as a protective response, disconnecting perception and bodily experience from overwhelming stimuli (Rabellino et al., 2018; van der Kolk, 2014). While dissociation can reduce immediate suffering, its intensity predicts subsequent PTSD, suggesting that early agency failure has lasting consequences (Ozer et al., 2003; Brewin et al., 2000).

Trauma thus constitutes more than a disruption of safety or meaning: it is a sensorimotor rupture in which the self is no longer experienced as an embodied and effective agent in the world within a temporal continuity. The traumatic event is not integrated as an episode located in the past, but remains experientially present, fragmented and decontextualized (Rybyk and Medvedev, 2025; Correa et al., 2022; Keidar et al., 2025).

## PTSD symptoms as attempts to restore agency

If trauma entails a collapse of agency, PTSD symptoms can be reinterpreted as efforts—often maladaptive—to restore it. This reframing shifts symptoms from being mere pathological residues to being understandable, though costly, adaptive strategies.

Intrusive thoughts and flashbacks may represent attempts to reprocess the TE and regain control over its unfolding. Repetitive mental replay can be seen as a search for an alternative action trajectory—an effort to reconstruct causality and agency retrospectively (Murray et al., 2022; Shipherd and Salters-Pedneault, 2008; Herman, 1992). Similarly, behavioral reenactments and risk-taking, particularly observed in complex PTSD, may reflect attempts to actively appropriate danger rather than remain passively subjected to it (van der Kolk, 2014).

Avoidance behaviors can be understood as compensatory strategies to reassert agency by controlling exposure to triggers

(Mairean, 2020). When internal regulation fails, avoiding environments, sensations, or relationships becomes the only reliable means of preventing further loss of control. Substance use may function analogously, modulating perception and affect to restore a sense of mastery, albeit transiently (Flynn et al., 2022).

Negative cognitions, including guilt and self-blame, paradoxically preserve agency by locating causality within the self rather than in an uncontrollable world. “If it was my fault, then I had control” becomes a psychologically coherent—though damaging—solution to helplessness (Ozer et al., 2003; Keane et al., 2006).

Hypervigilance and chronic arousal further illustrate this logic: constant monitoring of threat aims to prevent future agency collapse, even as it entrenches anxiety and physiological dysregulation (Cameron and Mamon, 2019).

Finally, dissociation occupies a paradoxical position. It simultaneously reflects a loss of agency and an active strategy to counter passive helplessness. By disengaging from perception or embodiment, individuals may reclaim a minimal sense of control over overwhelming experience—at the cost of coherence, presence, and long-term functioning (Morgan, 2013; Taylor and Morgan, 2014).

## Clinical and conceptual implications

Viewing PTSD through the prism of agency has important implications. First, it offers a unifying account linking peritraumatic responses, symptom clusters, and chronicity. Second, it complements cognitive and emotional models by foregrounding the embodied dimension of trauma, emphasizing action, sensorimotor prediction, and environmental engagement. Third, it challenges clinicians to consider not only how patients remember trauma, but how they experience themselves as agents in everyday life, but also within an assimilated past and an anticipable future.

Restoring agency may thus represent a core therapeutic target across PTSD subtypes, including dissociative and complex presentations, for which treatment guidelines remain limited (Brewin et al., 2017; Maercker et al., 2022). While established therapies may indirectly support agency by improving regulation and narrative coherence, an explicit focus on agency could help explain non-response and guide innovation.

## Conclusion

Psychological trauma can be understood as a profound loss of the SA, disrupting the individual's capacity to act meaningfully on the world. PTSD symptoms, in turn, reflect persistent attempts to repair this rupture—attempts that are understandable, adaptive in intent, yet often self-defeating. Re-centering agency in trauma theory invites a shift from viewing PTSD solely as a disorder of fear or memory toward recognizing it as a disorder of action, control, and embodied selfhood. Such a perspective may open new avenues for conceptual clarity and therapeutic progress in a field still marked by significant unmet needs.
## Author contributions

VA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

## Conflict of interest

In the past years, FS cofounded and received compensation from BeSound SAS. VA also received compensation from BeSound SAS.

The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial

relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI was used in the translation of some terms from French to English.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

## References

Akiki, T. J., Averill, C. L., and Abdallah, C. G. A. (2017). Network-based neurobiological model of PTSD: evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging studies. *Curr. Psychiatry Rep.* 19:81. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0840-4

Ataria, Y. (2015). Dissociation during trauma: the ownership-agency tradeoff model. *Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci.* 14, 1037-1053. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9392-9

Bracha, H. S. (2004). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. *CNS Spectr.* 9, 679-685. doi: 10.1017/S1092852900001954

Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., and Valentine, J. D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. *J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.* 68, 748-766. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748

Brewin, C. R., Cloitre, M., Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Maercker, A., Bryant, R. A., et al. (2017). A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD. *Clin. Psychol. Rev.* 58, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001

Cameron, A. Y., and Mamon, D. (2019). Towards A Better Understanding of Hypervigilance in Combat Veterans. *Mil. Behav. Health* 7, 206-217. doi: 10.1080/21635781.2018.1526144

Correa, R., Rodriguez, N., and Bortolaso, M. (2022). What is the nature of the alteration of temporality in Trauma-Related Altered States of Consciousness? A neuro-phenomenological analysis. *Eur. J. Trauma Dissoc.* 6:100227. doi: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2021.100227

Flynn, A. J., Navarro, G. Y., and Basehore, H. K. (2022). PTSD avoidance symptoms associated with alcohol craving in treatment-seeking veteran population. *J. Dual Diagn.* 18, 135-143. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2022.2089799

Friston, K. J. (2017). Precision psychiatry. *Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging* 2, 640-643. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.08.007

Haggard, P., and Chambon, V. (2012). Sense of agency. *Curr. Biol.* 22:R390-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040

Herman, J. L. (1992). Complex PTSD: a syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. *J. Trauma. Stress* 5, 377-391. doi: 10.1002/jts.2490050305

Keane, T. M., Marshall, A. D., and Taft, C. T. (2006). Posttraumatic stress disorder: etiology, epidemiology, and treatment outcome. *Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.* 2, 161-197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2022305.095305

Keidar, A., Gafter, L., and Lahav, Y. (2025). Trapped in time: time perspective explains PTSD symptom severity following childhood abuse. *Child Abuse Negl.* 164:107450. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107450

Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., and Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. *Arch. Gen. Psychiatry* 52, 1048-1060. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.0395024006 6012

Koenen, K. C., Ratanatharathorn, A., Ng, L., McLaughlin, K. A., Bromet, E. J., Stein, D. J., et al. (2017). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. *Psychol. Med.* 47, 2260-2274. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000708

Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Schmahl, C., Bremner, J. D., et al. (2010). Emotion modulation in PTSD: clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. *Am. J. Psychiatry* 167, 640-647. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168

Linson, A., and Friston, K. (2019). Reframing PTSD for computational psychiatry with the active inference framework. *Cogn. Neuropsychiatry* 24, 347-368. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2019.1665994

Maercker, A., Cloitre, M., Bachem, R., Schlumpf, Y. R., Khoury, B., Hitchcock, C., et al. (2022). Complex post-traumatic stress disorder. *Lancet* 400, 60-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00821-2

Mairean, C. (2020). Fear and avoidance of driving among drivers involved in a road traffic crash. The role of traumatic fear and driving cognitions. *Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.* 74, 322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.026

Morgan, C. A. III, Taylor, M. K. (2013). Spontaneous and deliberate dissociative states in military personnel: are such states helpful? *J. Trauma. Stress* 26, 492-497. doi: 10.1002/jts.21834

Murray, H., Grey, N., Warnock-Parkes, E., Kerr, A., Wild, J., Clark, D. M., et al. (2022). Ten misconceptions about trauma-focused CBT for PTSD. *Cogn. Behav. Therap.* 15:s1754470x22000307. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X2200 0307

Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., and Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. *Psychol. Bull.* 129, 52-73. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.52

Rabellino, D., Burin, D., Harricharan, S., Lloyd, C., Frewen, P. A., McKinnon, M. C., et al. (2018). Altered sense of body ownership and agency in posttraumatic stress disorder and its dissociative subtype: a rubber hand illusion study. *Front. Hum. Neurosci.* 12:163. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00163

Rybyk, L., and Medvedev, V. (2025). Perception of time perspective in the first year after the loss of a loved one. *Med. Res. Arch.* 13:6359. doi: 10.18103/mra.v13i2. 6359
Schnurr, P. P., Chard, K. M., Ruzek, J. I., Chow, B. K., Resick, P. A., Foa, E. B., et al. (2022). Comparison of prolonged exposure vs cognitive processing therapy for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder among us veterans: a randomized clinical trial. *JAMA Netw. Open* 5:e2136921. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36921

Shin, L. M., Wright, C. I., Cannistraro, P. A., Wedig, M. M., McMullin, K., Martis, B., et al. (2005). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to overtly presented fearful faces in posttraumatic stress disorder. *Arch. Gen. Psychiatry* 62, 273–281. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.273

Shipherd, J. C., and Salters-Pedneault, K. (2008). Attention, memory, intrusive thoughts, and acceptance in PTSD: an update on the empirical literature for clinicians. *Cogn. Behav. Pract.* 15, 349–363. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.01.003

Steenkamp, M. M., Litz, B. T., Hoge, C. W., and Marmar, C. R. (2015). Psychotherapy for military-related PTSD: a review of randomized clinical trials. *JAMA* 314, 489–500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8370

Taylor, M. K., and Morgan, C. A. III (2014). Spontaneous and deliberate dissociative states in military personnel: relationships to objective performance under stress. *Mil. Med.* 179, 955–958. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00081

Tsakiris, M., Schütz-Bosbach, S., and Gallagher, S. (2007). On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. *Conscious. Cogn.* 16, 645–660. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.012

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). *The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma*. New York, NY: Viking.