# Influence of Gold on Ce-Zr-Co Fluorite-Type Mixed Oxide Catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming

Julio Cesar Vargas, Svetlana Ivanova, Sébastien Thomas, Anne-Cécile Roger, Véronique Pitchon

► To cite this version:

Julio Cesar Vargas, Svetlana Ivanova, Sébastien Thomas, Anne-Cécile Roger, Véronique Pitchon. Influence of Gold on Ce-Zr-Co Fluorite-Type Mixed Oxide Catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming. Catalysts, 2012, 2 (4), pp.121-138. 10.3390/catal2010121 hal-01840364

HAL Id: hal-01840364

https://hal.science/hal-01840364

Submitted on 25 May 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Article

# Influence of Gold on Ce-Zr-Co Fluorite-Type Mixed Oxide Catalysts for Ethanol Steam Reforming

Julio Cesar Vargas<fnref n="1" />, Svetlana Ivanova<fnref n="2" />, Sébastien Thomas<fnref n="3" />, Anne-Cécile Roger<fnref n="4" /> and Véronique Pitchon<fnref n="4" />,*

Received: 9 January 2012; in revised form: 18 January 2012 / Accepted: 27 January 2012 /

Published: 3 February 2012

**Abstract:** The effect of gold presence on carbon monoxide oxidation and ethanol steam reforming catalytic behavior of two Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides catalysts with a constant Co charge and different Ce/Zr ratios was investigated. The Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides were obtained by the pseudo sol-gel like method, based on metallic propionates polymerization and thermal decomposition, whereas the gold-supported Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides catalysts were prepared using the direct anionic exchange. The catalysts were characterized using XRD, TPR, and EDXS-TEM. The presence of Au in doped Ce-Zr-Co oxide catalyst decreases the temperature necessary to reduce the cobalt and the cerium loaded in the catalyst and favors a different reaction pathway, improving the acetaldehyde route by ethanol dehydrogenation, instead of the ethylene route by ethanol dehydration or methane re-adsorption, thus increasing the catalytic activity and selectivity into hydrogen.

**Keywords:** ethanol steam reforming; hydrogen; gold; cerium-zirconium-cobalt mixed oxides

<footnote n="1">¹ Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Ambiental, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Avenida Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá Edificio 453, Colombia; E-Mail: jcvargass@unal.edu.co</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Centro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla—CSIC, Avenida Américo Vespucio, N° 49, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla 41092, Spain; E-Mail: svetlana@cartuja.csic.es</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Laboratoire Catalyse et Spectrochimie, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS, 6 Boulevard Maréchal Juin, Caen Cedex 14050, France; E-Mail: sebastien.thomas@ensicaen.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Laboratoire des Matériaux, Surfaces et Procédés pour la Catalyse, ECPM, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, 25 rue Becquerel, Strasbourg Cedex 2-67087, France; E-Mail: rogerac@ecpm.u-strasbg.fr</footnote>

<footnote>* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: pitchon@chimie.u-strasbg.fr.</footnote>
# 1. Introduction

Energy is the key element in the interaction between nature and society and is considered as an essential requirement for the economic development [1]. Nowadays, 87% of the primary energy demand is obtained from non-renewable resources with limited availability as fossil and nuclear sources [2]. In addition, the energy production from traditional sources is considered to be polluting and unsustainable. Carbon dioxide emissions during the energy generation from the fossil fuels have become one of the principal environmental preoccupations in the last few years, since it is considered as a major participant to global warming. In the near future, it is necessary to produce energy using alternative sources, considered as renewable, sustainable, efficient, safe and economically attractive [3]. For this purpose, the use of hydrogen as an efficient and clean fuel is an interesting alternative to the future way to produce energy, but only if obtained from a sustainable source. Hydrogen produced from biofuels such as bioethanol, obtained by biomass fermentation, has a great potential to produce sustainable energy [4,5].

The global reaction of steam reforming of ethanol can be represented by the following general Equation 1:

$$CH_3CH_2OH + 3 H_2O = 2 CO_2 + 6 H_2 \quad (1)$$

However, different parallel reaction paths exist, such as dehydration into ethylene, dehydrogenation into acetaldehyde, condensation to acetone and cracking reactions [6–8]. The relative contribution of the different routes depends on the nature of the support, the active phase and the conditions of the process, as can be seen in Scheme 1.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Scheme 1.** Possible path route in steam reforming of ethanol.</figcaption></figure>
Many active species have been evaluated for the steam reforming of ethanol: noble (Rh, Ru, Re, Pd, Ir, Pt, Rh-Pt, Rh-Pd, Ru-Pt,) and transition (Ni, Cu, Co) metals supported on metal oxides, with a wide range of acid-base and redox properties, which have been the subject of several reviews in the last years [4,5,9,10]. Some catalysts based on copper and nickel revealed interesting activities [11–14] but among the systems reported in the literature, the use of cobalt or rhodium-based catalysts as active phase seems to give the most promising results [15,16]. Although bimetallic noble/transition-based catalyst (Rh-Co, Ru-Co, Rh-Ni) studied for this reaction showed interesting results [17,18], supports with oxygen mobility, such as CeO₂ and CeO₂-ZrO₂, have received special attention since they are expected to act as promoters in improving the catalytic stability and preventing carbonaceous formations [19,20].

The ethanol steam reforming products (catalytic selectivity) are the result of a complicated network of reactions strongly influenced by the active phase oxidation state [21,22], the nature of the support, the activation process, the water/ethanol ratio, the reaction temperature and the contact time between the reactant and the catalyst [5,6]. Furthermore, the reaction conditions induce changes in the catalyst physico-chemical properties (i.e., additional reduction of active phase, solid state reactions, sintering, etc.) and therefore in the catalytic selectivity and stability.

In some earlier publications, it was reported that the insertion of Co, as active phase [23–25] into the Ce-Zr mixed oxides and the subsequent doping with Rh [26,27], improve the catalytic stability and selectivity for ethanol steam reforming.

In this work, the influence of gold on Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides, with different Ce/Zr ratios, is evaluated in the reaction of steam reforming of ethanol. The phase Ce-Zr-Co on its own is already identified as active for this reaction, but the use of gold could promote the activity and affects the route of production of hydrogen going through the acetaldehyde intermediate [28]. The catalysts were also tested in the reaction of CO oxidation for which gold is known to be the most active metal when present as nanosized particles [29]. The choice of studying this reaction was made because gold supported on the type of supports as prepared for this work has not yet been explored for this reaction, but also because CO oxidation serves as a probe reaction for both electronic and geometric factors. The oxidation of carbon monoxide by oxygen is a reaction which is described in the literature as being sensitive to the particle size, the support reducibility and the interaction of gold with the support [30].

## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. *Preparation of the Catalysts*

#### 2.1.1. Preparation of the Ce-Zr-Co Mixed Oxides

Two Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides, (Ce<sub>w</sub>Zr<sub>y</sub>Co<sub>0.9</sub>O<sub>8-δ</sub>, w + y = 3.1), were synthesized by a pseudo sol-gel method, based on the thermal decomposition of propionate precursors, as reported by Vargas *et al.* [23]. The starting materials for Ce, Zr and Co were cerium (III) acetate hydrate, zirconium (IV) acetylacetonate and cobalt (II) acetate hydrate, which all led exclusively to propionate precursors in propionic acid. The salts with concentration of 0.12 mol L<sup>-1</sup> were dissolved in boiling propionic acid, separately. The three boiling solutions were mixed and the solvent was evaporated until a resin was formed. The resin was thermally treated at 500 °C in air by heating at a rate of 2 °C min<sup>-1</sup> for 6 h.
2.1.2. Preparation of the Au/Ce-Zr-Co Samples

The gold was subsequently deposited on the mixed oxide by a direct anionic exchange (DAE) between
the support and a 10⁻⁴ M solution of HAuCL₄ in order to deposit 1 wt.% of the gold. The chlorine was
completely removed by an ammonia washing (4 M solution, 1 h) and a subsequent water washing, which
both improves the activity and prevents sintering, as reported by Ivanova *et al.* [31]. The catalysts were
calcined in air at 300 °C for 4 h with a ramp rate of 5 °C min⁻¹.

## 2.2. Characterizations

The chemical analysis of Au and Cl was performed by inductively coupled plasma atom emission spectroscopy ICPS at the CNRS Centre of Chemical Analysis (Vernaison, France). The detection limit was 150 ppm for Cl. The analyses were carried out following the calcination of the catalyst. The Au weight loading is expressed as the percentage of Au per weight of calcined catalyst.

Previous to the gold deposition, the micro-homogeneity of the Ce-Zr-Co samples was determined
by EDXS micro-analysis on a TOPCON EM-002B apparatus (acceleration voltage 200 kV).

The crystallinity of the Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxide was studied by X-ray diffraction (Siemens D5000, Cu Kα radiation, 20° < 2θ < 65°, 0.068 min⁻¹).

The reducibility was studied by Thermo-Programmed Reduction (TPR). Measurements were
carried out with a home-made apparatus equipped with a TCD on 50 mg of sample heated from room
temperature to 900 °C at 15 °C min⁻¹ under 3.85% H₂/Ar mixture (50 mL min⁻¹).

2.3. *Catalytic Tests*

2.3.1. CO Oxidation

The reaction was performed at atmospheric pressure using a fixed bed quartz packed micro-reactor
with 50 mg catalyst diluted in cordierite and a gas mixture of 1.5% CO and 5% O₂ in He with a total
flow rate of 50 mL min⁻¹ (GHSV~23,000 h⁻¹). The flows were regulated using Tylan mass flow
controllers. The catalytic reaction was performed from room temperature to 300 °C with a heating rate
of 5 °C min⁻¹, with temperature monitored and controlled by a Eurotherm system. Analysis for both
CO and CO₂ were performed by Rosemount Infrared analyzers. The experiment was repeated several
times in order to measure the reproducibility. Before each test, the catalyst was pre-treated at 300 °C in
air for 2 h.

2.3.2. Ethanol Steam Reforming

The ethanol steam reforming reaction was carried out in a fixed bed reactor, at atmospheric
pressure, using 160 mg of catalyst, heated at 2 °C min⁻¹ from room temperature to 440 °C in an Ar/N₂
mixture (total flow: 35 mL min⁻¹, 4:1 M, GHSV~5,000 h⁻¹), without any reduction treatment. After
1 h at 440 °C, the ethanol/water mixture (15 mL min⁻¹ of mixture in gas phase) was introduced using
the same Ar/N₂ mixture (GHSV: 26,000 h⁻¹) as carrier and the reactive test was carried out at 440 °C
for 5 h. The mixture ethanol:water (1:6 molar) in phase liquid was fed by using a Gilson HPLC pump
to an evaporator before the reactor inlet, mixed with the inert gas mixture and introduced into the reactor.

The gas products were analyzed on-line by micro-gas chromatography to identify the principal products and by-products (column Poraplot Q; column molecular sieve 5 Å) by direct injection of the effluent reactor stream. No condensation of condensable products was performed.

The results are expressed in terms of molar selectivity in the gas phase for H₂, CO₂, CO, CH₃CHO, C₂H₄, CH₄ and CH₃COCH₃. When considering only the steam reforming reaction, a maximum of 75% of hydrogen selectivity can then be achieved with those reaction conditions.

The hydrogen yield is expressed in gram of hydrogen per hour per gram of catalyst, the maximum H₂ yield which can be obtained in the reaction conditions is 0.45 g H₂ h⁻¹ gcat⁻¹.

### 3. Results and Discussion

Two samples of Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides were prepared, Ce₁.₈₅Zr₁.₂₅Co₀.₉O₇.₄ and Ce₁.₂₃Zr₁.₈₇Co₀.₉O₇.₄, and used as supports for gold containing catalysts. The sample with the highest cerium content will be referred to as CeZrCo-A whereas the catalyst with the highest Zr content will be referred to as CeZrCo-B. The corresponding gold samples will then be designed as Au/CeZrCo-A and Au/CeZrCo-B.

The metallic elemental composition for the samples, obtained from ICPS and global EDXS analysis (200 nm), was found to be very close to the expected theoretical value and showed a high degree of homogeneity. The gold loading (ICPS) was close to the theoretical value of 1 wt% and almost reproduced in the system with higher cerium content (0.96 wt%). This has been already observed for the bare oxide systems [32]. As an example, for catalyst B, the theoretical molar distribution is Ce 30.8%, Zr 46.7%, Co 22.5%. ICP analysis gave Ce 33.2%, Zr 44.8%, Co 22.0% and the composition from EDX analysis was Ce 33.0%, Zr 44.7%, Co 22.3%. The Cl content is under the detection limit (150 ppm) which allows claiming that the catalyst is almost chlorine free. However, from the local composition measurements (14.4 nm), EDXS analysis, some non-homogeneous composition zones are observed. Nevertheless, the sample with higher Ce/Zr ratio in the mixed oxides exhibits the best global and local chemical homogeneity.

The diffractograms of the CeZrCo mixed oxides, before and after the gold deposition are presented in Figure 1.

The mixed oxides preparation method of bare Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides allows the crystallization without any noticeable phase rejection, showing the main cubic structure of Ce-Zr fluorite type oxide. No single cerium or zirconium oxides are detected (CeO₂, ZrO₂) and only a small weak peak corresponding to cobalt oxide spinel phase is present in the samples at 36° (Figure 1a,b). Depending upon Ce/Zr ratio, it can be noted a shift of the diffraction peak to lower angles (2θ) for the sample with high Ce/Zr ratio, which could be attributed to the zirconium and cobalt insertion, both having smaller ionic radii compared to cerium ionic radius. The formation of mixed propionates during the polymerization step of the preparation allows the formation of the Co-O-Zr and Co-O-Ce bonds as well as Zr-O-Ce bonds which ensures the insertion of cobalt in the mixed oxide lattice.

After the gold deposition on the mixed Ce-Zr-Co oxide surface, an additional diffraction line is visible at 2θ = 38.4°, corresponding to the Au(111) (Figure 1c,d), without obvious changes in the main
peaks corresponding to the fluorite structure. However, it is possible to observe a shift in the main
diffraction lines of the fluorite structure, indicating a modification in the degree of cobalt insertion in
the host structure, and resulting in different intensities in the cobalt oxide and gold peaks diffraction.
For the lower cerium content samples (Figure 1b,d), lower diffraction angles are observed after the
gold deposition. This behavior is a consequence of the different degree of vacancies initially present in
the CeZrCo mixed oxide fluorite structure as compared with those generated in the presence of gold. A
similar behavior was noted in gold/ceria catalysts [33,34].

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** X-Ray Diffractograms of: (a) CeZrCo-A; (b) CeZrCo-B; (c) Au/CeZrCo-A; (d) Au/CeZrCo-B.</figcaption></figure>

From the X-ray diffractograms, it is possible to calculate the particle size of gold by means of
Debye-Scherrer equation [35]. With the increase of zirconium content, the particles size decreases
from 28 nm for Au/CeZrCo-A to 24 nm for Au/CeZrCo-B, which could be attributed to a different
grafting mode of the gold precursor on the bare supports [30,32,36]. In any case, estimation of the size
by means of Debye-Scherrer equation tends to lead to an overestimation of the size as only large
particles undergo diffraction. Unfortunately, it was not possible to achieve a more accurate particle
size distribution because of the poor contrast obtained by transmission electron microscopy.

As the CeZrCo mixed oxide system was prepared to serve as a precursor of small cobalt particles,
which is the active phase in the reforming reaction [23,26], a special care of the reducibility of the
samples has to be taken. From the reduction profile TPR analysis (Figure 2), it is possible to describe
and discuss the effect of gold. The influence of gold on the TPR profiles is clear, as both the required temperatures to obtain the reduction of the samples and the way that reduction occurs are markedly affected.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Thermo-programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of samples: (a) CeZrCo-A; (b) CeZrCo-B; (c) Au/CeZrCo-A; (d) Au/CeZrCo-B.</figcaption></figure>

All the samples, independently of the Ce/Zr ratio or the presence of Au, led to two zones of reduction (Figure 2). For Au free samples (Figure 2a,b), the first reduction zone is located below 425 °C, whereas it occurs below 300 °C for the Au-loaded samples (Figure 2c,d). The first reduction zone is ascribed to the partial reduction of the surface cerium from $Ce^{4+}$ to $Ce^{3+}$ along with the simultaneous reduction of the cobalt species from $Co^{3+}$ and $Co^{2+}$ to $Co^{0}$. The second reduction zone at high temperature corresponds to the reduction of the $Co^{2+}$ incorporated into the fluorite structure and to the reduction of bulk ceria [25,37].

The TPR thermograms were decomposed into four peaks. For Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides there are three peaks in the reduction zone I, at 150, 300, and 380 °C and a broad peak in the reduction zone II, between 400 and 900 °C. The complete description of the thermograms has been published elsewhere for slightly different samples. Briefly, for the gold containing Ce-Zr-Co samples, two peaks at 125 and
200 °C are located in the first reduction zone and the second zone of temperature could also be decomposed into two peaks located at 380 °C and a broad peak between 400 and 900 °C, respectively.

The small consumption of hydrogen centered at around 150 °C (Figure 2a,b) is attributed to the reduction of highly dispersed cobalt oxide which is not incorporated into the fluorite structure. For the gold-loaded samples, there are both changes in the amount of H₂ which is slightly higher and a shift of reduction temperature towards a lower value. These two phenomena confirm the fact that there are indeed small modifications in the crystalline structure, as proven by XRD. The amount of cobalt oxide not incorporated in the fluorite structure increases, i.e., small particles of cobalt oxides are present on the support and their reduction is activated by the gold metallic particle.

By numerical integration, it is possible to calculate the contribution of each species to the overall consumption of hydrogen and to estimate the respective proportions of hydrogen allocated to zone 1 and 2. By assuming that, in the fresh samples, gold is in a metallic state—gold usually undergoes autoreduction upon calcination and the presence of metallic gold is proven by XRD—and that cobalt oxide, which is initially present as a stable oxide in the form of (CoO.Co₂O₃) is completely reduced upon hydrogen exposure, it is possible to determine the percentage of Ce⁴⁺ reduced to Ce³⁺ during the TPR. The overall hydrogen consumption per gram of catalyst, the percentage of partial reduction (in zone 1) and the percentage of hydrogen consumed by each species are presented in Table 1.

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Total hydrogen consumptions, peak area distribution of samples and percentage of cerium reduced after TPR.</caption><thead><tr><th>Samples</th><th>Peak 1<br>(%)</th><th>Peak 2<br>(%)</th><th>Peak 3<br>(%)</th><th>Peak 4<br>(%)</th><th>Zone I<br>(%)</th><th>H<sub>2</sub><br>(mL<sub>STP</sub> g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Ce<sup>IV</sup>→Ce<sup>III</sup><br>(%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CeZrCo-A</td><td>5</td><td>24</td><td>9</td><td>61</td><td>39</td><td>68</td><td>47</td></tr><tr><td>Au/CeZrCo-A</td><td>11</td><td>27</td><td>21</td><td>41</td><td>38</td><td>76</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>CeZrCo-B</td><td>5</td><td>25</td><td>6</td><td>63</td><td>37</td><td>68</td><td>56</td></tr><tr><td>Au/CeZrCo-B</td><td>10</td><td>30</td><td>17</td><td>43</td><td>40</td><td>58</td><td>26</td></tr></tbody></table>

For the Au-free samples, the hydrogen consumption from the first three peaks of reduction is quasi identical (1.2 × 10⁻³ mol g⁻¹ H₂ for CeZrCo-A and 1.1 × 10⁻³ for CeZrCo-B). The difference between these values and the calculated hydrogen consumption needed for complete cobalt species reduction could directly provide the percentage of the surface ceria reduction. For both samples, 39 and 37% of ceria surface reduction is obtained, respectively. In addition, the unaltered H₂ consumption for the peak 4 indicates a constant quantity of reduced bulk Ce⁴⁺, no matter the Zr composition. The presence of Zr does not seem to alter the reduction of the bulk cerium content.

However, the reduction of cobalt and cerium changes in the presence of gold being promoted by its presence; the first three peaks of cobalt reduction are completely repositioned. For the first peak, the temperature for reduction is lower, but the volume of consumed hydrogen is doubled, indicating the higher content of cobalt species rejected from the fluorite structure after gold deposition. Moreover, the presence of gold facilitates the Co³⁺ to Co²⁺ reduction (peak 2) for which a decrease of the temperature of reduction by 100 °C is observed. The amount of hydrogen consumed in this region is similar for all samples, which confirms that only cobalt is involved in this process. The presence of gold not only induces small structural changes as proven by XRD but modifies the reducibility of the
two species corresponding to the low temperature peaks. There is a higher reduction degrees at low temperature observed for both catalysts in the presence of gold. This confirms lower bonding energies of the oxygen on the surface oxidized species and therefore a higher mobility and higher reducibility, which generate vacancies on the surface or species with lower oxidation state which act as active sites (in this case reducing cobalt).

The third peak of reduction seems a little bit more complicated to explain. If the consumption is caused only by Co(II) to Co(0) reduction, the consumption of hydrogen should not change. But an increase in the hydrogen consumption is observed and the temperature of reduction remains unchanged, indicating a higher contribution of the surface ceria reduction. This is confirmed by the fact that for the CeZrCo-B system, where the quantity of Ce is lower, the hydrogen consumption is also lower. However, the calculations of the surface ceria contribution to the reduction process show very similar values, 38% for Au-CeZrCo-A and 40% for Au-CeZrCo-B. The later indicates that the gold presence provokes cobalt rejection of the fluorite structure resulting in a higher H₂ consumption at low temperature compensated by a higher surface ceria reduction contribution.

The high temperature peak of reduction (>500 °C) corresponding to the bulk cerium reduction shows a decrease in terms of hydrogen consumption when gold is present which can be directly related to the increase of the surface ceria reduction (Table 1).

Regardless of the composition of the catalyst, there exists a temperature range free of reduction for all the samples, which allows the possibility to clearly distinguish the zone of partial reduction. This allows the use of catalytic systems in which cobalt is partially reduced and is chemically stable at the temperature at which the reaction of ethanol reforming occurs.

For CeZrCo samples, the zone I is the count of peaks 1, 2, and 3. Otherwise, the zone I in Au/CeZrCo samples is the count of peaks 1 and 2. By comparing the percentage of reduction of zone I and II of gold containing and not containing samples, it is possible to observe a similar area distribution, in which the hydrogen consumption is near to 40% of the total one.

### 3.1. CO Oxidation

The complete oxidation of carbon monoxide is one of the most studied reactions for gold-containing catalysts since the astonishing discovery of Haruta *et al.* [29] that very small gold nanoparticles exhibit catalytic activity at sub-ambient temperature. The method of preparation has a great influence on the catalytic behavior since it affects the gold particles' size, morphology and oxidation state. Furthermore, gold catalysts activity is influenced by several parameters such as acidity or basicity of the support, the thermal treatment or the nature of activation process [30]. Therefore the CO reaction serves as a probe reaction not only for the particle size but also to reveal subtle changes in the electronic state of gold or in the morphology of the particles, modifications which other techniques are at pains to reveal. The conversion of carbon monoxide as a function of the temperature is presented in Figure 3 for all the samples with or without gold.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Conversion de CO as a function of temperature.</figcaption></figure>

The Ce/Zr ratio does not influence the activity of the gold free samples. The complete CO oxidation is obtained at 225 °C. When gold is deposited on the mixed oxides phase the behavior of the catalysts changes significantly. They become very active, showing even an activity at room temperature and with a total conversion at ca. 125 °C. The Au/CeZrCo-B sample is slightly more active than Au/CeZrCo-A sample, which could be attributed to the difference in the gold particle size observed for these samples.

## 3.2. *Ethanol Steam Reforming*

In order to elucidate the influence of gold on the Ce-Zr-Co catalytic behavior, the reaction of ethanol steam reforming was carried out at low temperature (440 °C). This temperature favors the production of acetone, by acetaldehyde condensation, and the deactivation by carbonaceous species is impeded. For the same reasons, the catalysts were not reduced before the catalytic test, and were therefore used as prepared [25]. The gas phase distribution—i.e., the selectivity—is strongly influenced by the reaction temperature and the active phase reduction state (metallic phase). At temperatures higher than 550 °C, only the main products ($H_2$, CO, $CO_2$, $CH_4$) are formed, as a consequence of the transformation of the intermediate adsorbed compounds [8,25] and of some thermodynamics restrictions. A similar behavior is observed when the active phase is in the metallic state, which is so influential that it hides the role of promoters occurring only in the deactivation route and affects long-term stability. The presence of trace of propylene can be attributed to acetone hydrogenation [38].

The evolution of the catalytic conversion of the samples with the reaction time is given in Figure 4.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Ethanol conversion as a function of time on stream.</figcaption></figure>

All the catalytic systems are very active for the reaction with an ethanol conversion close to 100% in the first hours of the reaction, despite the fact that no reducing treatment was performed. The change in the Ce/Zr ratio does not seem to have a great influence on the ethanol conversion but has an effect in the catalytic selectivity, modifying the acetone and ethylene production. In the case of Ce-Zr-Co samples, the activity decreases slowly down to 98% after 5 h of reaction whereas for the Au/CeZrCo samples, the activity remains higher than 99.8% for the first 5 h of reaction. The gold addition seems to change the kinetics of deactivation and to stabilize the conversion for a longer time probably due to a higher activity to transform the adsorbed intermediates or by changing the reaction route. The process of carbonaceous deposition and/or active surface change by the adsorption of intermediary products, as principal causes of deactivation [39] seems to be inhibited or delayed.

In Figure 5, the gas phase distribution for both gold containing catalysts compared with the bare Ce-Zr-Co catalysts. In the Figure 5a,a' the molar product distribution of the main products (H₂, CO₂ and CO) is presented, whereas in Figure 5b,b' the molar distribution of the secondary products (CH₄, C₂H₄, CH₃COCH₃) are given, which gives some insights into the reaction path.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Gas phase distribution as a function of time on stream: (a,a') CeZrCo-A catalysts; (b,b') CeZrCo-B catalysts. Full symbols—CeZrCo samples, empty symbols—Au/CeZrCo samples.</figcaption></figure>
The Table 2 is summarizing the average molar distribution of products during the whole time of reaction.

<table><caption>**Table 2.** Average distribution (in %mol) in the gas phase on CeZrCo and Au/CeZrCo samples.</caption><thead><tr><th>Sample</th><th>CH<sub>4</sub></th><th>CO<sub>2</sub></th><th>C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub></th><th>H<sub>2</sub></th><th>CO</th><th>C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>6</sub></th><th>CH<sub>3</sub>COCH<sub>3</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>CeZrCo-A</td><td>0.5</td><td>19.6</td><td>1.8</td><td>67.4</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.1</td><td>10.4</td></tr><tr><td>Au/CeZrCo-A</td><td>0.5</td><td>19.0</td><td>0.7</td><td>69.4</td><td>1.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>CeZrCo-B</td><td>0.4</td><td>19.6</td><td>2.3</td><td>67.4</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>Au/CeZrCo-B</td><td>0.6</td><td>19.0</td><td>0.5</td><td>69.7</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.1</td><td>8.4</td></tr></tbody></table>

For CeZrCo and Au/CeZrCo samples, independently of Ce/Zr ratio, the molar distribution of the main products in the gas phase remains almost stable with time on stream, independently of the conversion.

However, in the presence of gold, the gas phase distribution of H₂ and minor products, with the exception of methane, presents some significant changes resulting from a different reaction pathway, which favors the activation of ethanol through CH₃CHO instead of the one through C₂H₄. The significant decrease of ethylene in the presence of gold tends to show that the dehydration of ethanol (acid way) decreased. Consequently the second activation way by dehydrogenation into acetaldehyde is favored.

In the presence of Au, a high selectivity toward hydrogen is observed, along with a higher CO production. A decrease of both of acetone and ethylene is obtained, but in the case of this latter product, it is more marked. The CH₄ and CO₂ production remains almost constant despite the addition of gold. This behavior suggests that in the presence of gold, the ethanol-reforming reaction proceeds mainly on CeZrCo actives sites preferentially through the acetaldehyde intermediate. The preferential decomposition of this intermediate by decarboxylation produces CO and CH₄, or its corresponding adsorbed species. Therefore, acetone production is affected since it is formed by acetaldehyde condensation reaction.

The adsorbed species are rapidly evolved in the steam reforming reaction increasing the CO and H₂ amounts (Scheme 1). The major CO interaction in the presence of gold could be confirmed by the catalytic results as shown in the total oxidation of CO. Otherwise, the slight increase in CO₂ amounts in gold containing samples could be explained through the water gas shift reaction (WGSR). It is also interesting to note the absence of acetaldehyde formation during the course of the reaction, despite the slight decrease in the conversion, thus confirming the high rate of conversion of acetaldehyde to other products.

Another interesting result concerns the increase in the amount of ethylene produced at a higher Ce/Zr ratio, which is attributed to the inclusion of Zr in the structure, decreasing the acidity of the support and therefore favoring the reaction pathway to the acetone production. The effect of Ce/Zr molar ratio on redox behavior and of the acid-base properties acid-base is well known. A catalyst with acidic properties favors the dehydration route to produce ethylene and water whereas catalysts with basic properties favor the dehydrogenation route producing acetaldehyde and hydrogen. At low temperatures of reaction, acetaldehyde is converted by ketonization reactions to acetone.
When the hydrogen yield is calculated (Figure 6), a higher hydrogen production, by gram of catalyst and per hour is obtained for the gold containing catalysts.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Hydrogen yield as a function of time on stream. (Full symbols: CeZrCo samples, empty symbols: Au/CeZrCo samples).</figcaption></figure>

The differences in the hydrogen yield obtained in CeZrCo and Au/CeZrCo catalyst, are influenced by the decrease of the conversion but not by the hydrogen selectivity changes and as a consequence, the hydrogen yield is higher in the gold containing samples.

In Figure 7 the diffractograms of the CeZrCo and Au/CeZrCo catalyst, before and after steam reforming reaction are presented.

The samples were evaluated as catalyst without any reduction process, in order to study the gold influence in the Ce-Zr-Co mixed oxides catalytic activity and stability. By comparing the X-ray diffraction before and after the test, it is possible to observe the reduction under the reactive mixture. In all samples, the diffraction pattern corresponding to Co₃O₄ in the spinel phase, as observed in the case of the fresh samples, is no longer observed after the catalytic test, proving the reduction of inserted cobalt to a lower oxidation state.

For the gold free CeZrCo catalyst (Figure 7a,b) a peak related with CoO is observed at ca. 2θ = 43°, whereas for the gold containing CeZrCo catalyst (Figure 7b,c) the apparition of this peak is not obtained and no indication of a deeper reduction into Co⁰ is demonstrated by XRD. This difficulty could be attributed to a smaller particle size of cobalt in the reduced state, therefore not easily detectable but most probably, it corresponds to a higher degree of dispersion due to the presence of gold. It is possible to state the reduction of the outer cobalt structure that occurred, as based on the observation of the Co₃O₄ peak decreasing. However, the reduction of the cobalt inserted in the structure was not obtained since no changes in the fluorite structure oxide peak diffraction were observed. In respect to the gold stability, it seems that sintering under the reactive mixture during the catalytic test did not occur, since no remarkable changes in gold corresponding structure are observed.
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** X-Ray Diffractograms of catalysts, before and after ethanol steam reforming, test of: (a) CeZrCo-A; (b) Au/CeZrCo-A; (c) CeZrCo-B; (d) Au/CeZrCo-B.</figcaption></figure>

**4. Conclusions**

Two CeZrCo mixed oxides; Ce<sub>w</sub>Zr<sub>y</sub>Co<sub>0.9</sub>O<sub>8-δ</sub> (x + y = 3.1), synthesized by a pseudo sol-gel like method lead to a partial cobalt integration in the fluorite lattice with high homogeneity at nanoscale level, which is influenced by Ce/Zr ratio, producing a cobalt segregation as Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>.

The presence of gold affects the degree of the insertion of cobalt, generating a modification in the fluorite oxide structure and resulting in a different profile of reduction vs. temperature. This effect is strictly dependent on the Ce/Zr ratio.

The CeZrCo and Au/CeZrCo mixed oxides are effective catalysts to transform carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide and ethanol into hydrogen, even at low temperatures. The gold-containing samples present the best catalytic activity in both reactions, which is ascribed to the modification in the crystalline structure of fluorite type oxides, with a generation of oxygen vacancies, an increase of oxygen mobility and active phases which therefore become more easily reduced producing a large number of active sites.

**References**

1. Prince, D. Energy and human evolution. *Popul. Environ.* **1978**, *16*, 301.

2. *International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook*; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2009. Available online: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/ (accessed on 1 November 2011).
3. Chum, H.L.; Evered, R.P. Biomass and renewable fuels. *Fuel Process. Technol.* **2001**, *71*, 187–195.

4. Haryanto, A.; Fernando, S.; Murali, N.; Adhikari, S. Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol: A review. *Energy Fuels* **2005**, *19*, 2098–2116.

5. Ramírez de la Piscina, P.; Homs, N. Use of biofuels to produce hydrogen (reformation processes). *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **2008**, *37*, 2459–2467.

6. Fatsikostas, A.N.; Verykios, X.E. Reaction network of steam reforming of ethanol over Ni-based catalysts. *J. Catal.* **2004**, *225*, 439–452.

7. Benito, M.; Padilla, R.; Errano-Lotina, A.S.; Rodríguez, L.; Brey, J.J.; Daza, L. The role of surface reactions on the active and selective catalyst design for bioethanol steam reforming. *J. Power Sources* **2009**, *192*, 158–164.

8. Song, H.; Zhang, L.; Ozkan, U.S. Investigation of the reaction network in ethanol steam reforming over supported cobalt catalysts. *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.* **2010**, *49*, 8984–8989.

9. Vaidya, P.D.; Rodrigues, A.E. Insight into steam reforming of ethanol to produce hydrogen for fuel cells. *Chem. Eng. J.* **2006**, *117*, 39–49.

10. Ni, M.; Leung, Y.C.; Leung, M.K.H. A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. *Int. J. Hydrog. Energy* **2007**, *32*, 3238–3247.

11. Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming over Cu-Ni supported catalysts. *Int. J. Hydrog. Energy* **2007**, *32*, 1450–1461.

12. Vizcaíno, A.J.; Arena, P.; Baronetti, G.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A.; Laborde, M.A.; Amadeo, N. Ethanol steam reforming on Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts: Effect of Mg addition. *Int. J. Hydrog. Energy* **2008**, *33*, 3489–3492.

13. Sánchez-Sánchez, M.C.; Navarro, R.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Ethanol steam reforming over La, Zr and Mg catalysts: Influence of support on the hydrogen production. *Int. J. Hydrog. Energy* **2007**, *32*, 1462–1471.

14. Mariño, F.; Baronetti, G.; Jobbagy, M.; Laborde, M. Cu-Ni-K/γ-Al₂O₃ supported catalysts for ethanol steam reforming: Formation of hydrotalcite-type compounds as a result of metal-support interaction. *Appl. Catal. A* **2003**, *238*, 41–54.

15. Llorca, J.; Homs, N.; Sales, J.; Ramirez de la Piscina, P. Efficient Production of hydrogen over supported cobalt catalysts from ethanol steam reforming. *J. Catal.* **2002**, *209*, 306–317.

16. Frusteri, F.; Freni, S.; Spadaro, L.; Chiodo, V.; Bonura, G.; Donato, S.; Cavallaro, S. H₂ production for MC fuel cell by steam reforming of ethanol over MgO supported Pd, Rh, Ni and Co catalysts. *Catal. Commun.* **2004**, *5*, 611–615.

17. Pereira, E.B.; Homs, N.; Martí, S.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Ramírez de la Piscina, P. Oxidative steam-reforming of ethanol over Co/SiO₂, Co-Rh/SiO₂ and Co-Ru/SiO₂ catalysts: Catalytic behavior and deactivation/regeneration processes. *J. Catal.* **2008**, *257*, 206–214.

18. Le Valant, A.; Bion, N.; Can, F.; Duprez, D.; Epron, F. Preparation and characterization of bimetallic Rh-Ni/Y₂O₃-Al₂O₃ for hydrogen production by raw bioethanol steam reforming: influence of the addition of nickel on the catalyst performances and stability. *Appl. Catal. B* **2010**, *97*, 72–81.

19. Birot, A.; Epron, F.; Descorme, C.; Duprez, D. Ethanol steam reforming over Rh/CeₓZr₁⁻ₓO₂ catalysts: Impact of the CO-CO₂-CH₄ interconversion reactions on the H₂ production. *Appl. Catal. B* **2008**, *79*, 17–25.
20. Srinivas, D.; Satyanarayana, C.V.V.; Potdar, H.S.; Ratnasamy, P. Structural studies on NiO-CeO₂-ZrO₂ catalysts for steam reforming of ethanol. *Appl. Catal. A* **2003**, *246*, 323–334.

21. Comas, J.; Mariño, F.; Laborde, M.; Amadeo, N. Bio-ethanol steam reforming on Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst. *Chem. Eng. J.* **2004**, *98*, 61–68.

22. Graschinsky, C.; Laborde, M.; Amadeo, N.; Le Valant, A.; Bion, N.; Epron, F.; Duprez, D. Ethanol steam reforming over Rh(1%)MgAl₂O₄/Al₂O₃: A kinetic study. *Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.* **2010**, *49*, 12383–12389.

23. Vargas, J.C.; Sternenberg, F.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A. Steam reforming of bioethanol on Coo/Ce-Zr-Co and Coo/Ce-Zr catalyst. A comparison between cobalt integration and cobalt impregnation. *Chem. Eng. Trans.* **2004**, *4*, 247–252.

24. Vargas, J.C.; Vanhaecke, E.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A. Hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming. Study of cobalt-doped Ce-Zr catalysts. *Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.* **2004**, *147*, 115–120.

25. Vargas, J.C.; Libs, S.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A. Study of Ce-Zr-Co fluorite-type oxide as catalysts for hydrogen production by steam reforming of bioethanol. *Catal. Today* **2005**, *107–108*, 417–425.

26. Romero-Sarria, F.; Vargas, J.C.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of ethanol: Study of mixed oxide catalysts Ce₂Zr₁.₅Me₀.₅O₈: Comparison of Ni/Co and effect of Rh. *Catal. Today* **2008**, *133–135*, 149–153.

27. Araque, M.; Vargas, J.C.; Zimmermann, Y.; Roger, A.C. Study of a CeZrCoRh mixed oxide for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming. *Int. J. Hydrog. Energy* **2011**, *36*, 1491–1502.

28. Sheng, P.-Y.; Bowmaker, G.A.; Idriss, H. The reactions of ethanol over Au/CeO₂. *Appl. Catal. A* **2004**, *261*, 171–181.

29. Haruta, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Sano, H.; Yamada, N. Novel gold catalysts for the oxidation of carbon monoxide at a temperature far below 0 °C. *Chem. Lett.* **1987**, *2*, 405–408.

30. Azizi, Y.; Pitchon, V.; Petit, C. Effect of support parameters on activity of gold catalysts: Studies of ZrO₂, TiO₂ and mixture. *Appl. Catal. A* **2010**, *385*, 170–177.

31. Ivanova, S.; Petit, C.; Pitchon, V. A new preparation method for the formation of gold nanoparticles on an oxide support. *Appl. Catal. A* **2004**, *267*, 191–201.

32. Ivanova, S.; Pitchon, V.; Petit, C. Application of the direct exchange method in the preparation of gold catalysts supported on different oxide materials. *J. Mol. Catal. A* **2006**, *256*, 278–283.

33. Fu, Q.; Deng, W.; Saltsburg, H.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Activity and stability of low-content gold-cerium oxide catalysts for the water–gas shift reaction. *Appl. Catal. B* **2005**, *56*, 57–68.

34. Venezia, A.M.; Pantaleo, G.; Longo, A.; Di Carlo, G.D.; Casaletto, M.P.; Liotta, F.L.; Deganello, G.J. Relationship between structure and CO oxidation activity of ceria-supported gold catalysts. *J. Phys. Chem. B* **2005**, *109*, 2821–2827.

35. Klug, H.P.; Alexander, L.E. X-Ray Diffraction Procedure for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974.

36. Ivanova, S. Formation de Nanoparticules d'or Supportées: De la Préparation à la Réactivité catalytique. PhD Thesis, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 2004.
37. Ambroise, E.; Courson, C.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A.; Blanchard, G.; Rousseau, S.; Carrier, X.; Marceau, E.; La Fontaine, C.; Villain, F. Exhaust gas recirculation for on-board hydrogen production by isooctane reforming: Comparison of performances of metal/ceria-zirconia based catalysts prepared through pseudo sol-gel or impregnation methods. *Catal. Today* **2010**, *154*, 133–141.

38. Mizuno, T.; Nakajima, T. TPR studies on steam reforming of 2-propanol on Rh/Al₂O₃, Ru/Al₂O₃ and Pd/Al₂O₃. *React. Kinet. Catal. Lett.* **2003**, *78*, 315–324.

39. Aupretre, F.; Descormes, C.; Duprez, D. Hydrogen production for fuel cells from the catalytic ethanol steam reforming. *Topics Catal.* **2004**, *30–31*, 487–491.

© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).