# Functional and numerical responses of the predatory mite Amblyseius aerialis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae)

Camila Tavares Ferreira, Cristina Aloyséia da Silva Noronha, Eduardo Pereira
Souza Neto, Raimundo Parente de Oliveira, Paulo Manoel Pontes Lins, Telma
Fátima Vieira Batista

► To cite this version:

Camila Tavares Ferreira, Cristina Aloyséia da Silva Noronha, Eduardo Pereira Souza Neto, Raimundo Parente de Oliveira, Paulo Manoel Pontes Lins, et al. Functional and numerical responses of the predatory mite Amblyseius aerialis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to Aceria guerreronis (Acari: Eriophyidae). Acarologia, 2022, 62 (1), pp.27-35. 10.24349/w600-25ar. hal-03519290

HAL Id: hal-03519290

https://hal.science/hal-03519290

Submitted on 10 Jan 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Acarologia
Open Science in Acarology

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Acarologia

A quarterly journal of acarology, since 1959
Publishing on all aspects of the Acari

All information:
http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/acarologia/
acarologia-contact@supagro.fr

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

OPEN ACCESS

Acarologia is proudly non-profit,
with no page charges and free open access

Please help us maintain this system by
encouraging your institutes to subscribe to the print version of the journal
and by sending us your high quality research on the Acari.

Subscriptions: Year 2022 (Volume 61): 450 €
http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/acarologia/subscribe.php

Previous volumes (2010-2020): 250 € / year (4 issues)
Acarologia, CBGP, CS 30016, 34988 MONTFERRIER-sur-LEZ Cedex, France
ISSN 0044-586X (print), ISSN 2107-7207 (electronic)

The digitalization of Acarologia papers prior to 2000 was supported by Agropolis Fondation under the reference ID 1500-024 through the « Investissements d'avenir » programme
(Labex Agro: ANR-10-LABX-0001-01)

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

agropolis fondation

Supporting agricultural research
for sustainable development

Acarologia is under **free license** and distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons-BY.
Acarologia

Open Science
in Acarology

# Functional and numerical responses of the predatory mite *Amblyseius aerialis* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to *Aceria guerreronis* (Acari: Eriophyidae)

Camila Tavares Ferreira IDª, Aloyséia Cristina da Silva Noronha IDᵇ,
Eduardo Pereira Souza Neto IDᶜ, Raimundo Parente De Oliveira IDᵇ,
Manoel Pontes Lins IDᵈ, Telma Fátima Vieira Batista IDª

## Original research

### ABSTRACT

The coconut mite, *Aceria guerreronis* Keifer, is one of the main pests of the coconut tree (Cocos nucifera L.) worldwide. Its control is mainly based on the use of acaricides. However, due to the habitat of this pest mite, which is protected by fruit bracts that act as a physical barrier, chemical control is often inefficient. Thus, natural enemies have been studied as an alternative to acaricides. We evaluated the functional and numerical responses of *Amblyseius aerialis* (Muma) to increasing densities of *A. guerreronis* (40, 80, 160, 240 and 360) and additionally the oviposition rates of the phytoseiid *A. aerialis* over 11 days on different food sources: coconut pollen, *A. guerreronis* and a mix of pollen and *A. guerreronis*. Our results showed that *Amblyseius aerialis* showed a type III functional response, where prey consumption increasing as the density of *A. guerreronis* increased, with a maximum consumption of up to 175 prey per predator. All the prey densities allowed female oviposition. The number of eggs laid by *A. aerialis* increased with increasing prey density and stabilized between 240 and 360 *A. guerreronis* individuals, with an average oviposition of 1.7 eggs/female. Furthermore, our results showed that all the food sources (coconut pollen, *A. guerreronis* and a mix of pollen and *A. guerreronis*) supported oviposition. The mean oviposition was approximately 1.5 eggs/female on all the food sources. Our study suggests that *A. aerialis* can be effective in the biological control of *A. guerreronis*. However, further studies are needed to investigate whether *A. aerialis* can explore the habitat of *A. guerreronis* and if that prey can support the development of immature stages and the reproduction of *A. aerialis*.

**Keywords** coconut mite; biological control; Cocos nucifera; predation; oviposition

### Introduction

The coconut mite (*Aceria guerreronis* Keifer) is a major pest of coconut (*Cocos nucifera* L.) fruits. It occurs in several countries worldwide (Haq *et al.* 2002; Lawson-Balagbo *et al.* 2008a; Fernando and Aratchige 2010; Negloh *et al.* 2011). In Brazil, it is found in all coconut plantations but with a lower incidence than in Africa and Asia (Lawson-Balagbo *et al.* 2008a). It develops in the perianth of the fruits below the bracts, initially causing a yellowish-white spot in a triangular shape close to the margin of the perianth. As the fruits grow, the damaged

Received 29 June 2021
Accepted 10 December 2021
Published 10 January 2022

Corresponding author
Camila Tavares Ferreira ID:
kmilatf@hotmail.com

Academic editor
Kreiter, Serge

https://doi.org/
10.24349/w600-25ar

ISSN 0044-586X (print)
ISSN 2107-7207 (electronic)

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Copyright
Ferreira C. T. et al.

Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

<footnote>ª Laboratório de Proteção de Plantas (LPP), Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA), Belém, PA, Brazil.</footnote>

<footnote>ᵇ Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa Amazônia Oriental), Belém, PA, Brazil.</footnote>

<footnote>ᶜ Laboratório de Acarologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.</footnote>

<footnote>ᵈ Sococo S. A. Agroindústria da Amazônia, Moju, PA, Brazil.</footnote>
tissue becomes necrotic (Haq *et al.* 2002; Galvão *et al.* 2008; Navia *et al.* 2013). This damage
leads to a reduction in the yield of solid and liquid albumens and even premature fruit fall
(Wickramananda *et al.* 2007). A higher *A. guerreronis* incidence on fruits can decrease the
mean number of fruits harvested per bunch by approximately 60% and decrease the liquid
albumen volume by 28% (Rezende *et al.* 2016).

Chemical control has been applied to the coconut mite worldwide. Successive pesticide sprayings are necessary to achieve satisfactory control as this pest develops in a habitat protected by fruit bracts that act as a physical barrier. However, this practice can cause undesired effects such as elimination of natural enemies, environmental contamination and presence of residues in fruits (Lawson-Balagbo et al. 2007; Fernando and Aratchige 2010; Van Leeuwen et al. 2010; Lima et al. 2012). The protection provided by bracts in fruits attacked by *A. guerreronis* was confirmed by Silva *et al.* (2017), who showed that bracts prevented exposure to the pesticide and that the pest was only vulnerable while dispersing. Therefore, alternative forms of control are necessary to manage this important pest.

The biological control of the coconut mite has been extensively researched. Predatory mites belonging to the family Phytoseiidae are considered the main natural enemies of the coconut mite, including *Neoseiulus baraki* (Athias-Henriot), *Neoseiulus paspalivorus* (De Leon), *Amblyseius largoensis* (Muma), *Neoseiulus recifensis* Gondim Jr. and Moraes and *Euseius alatus* De Leon (Lawson-Balagbo *et al.* 2008a, b; Reis *et al.* 2008; Galvão *et al.* 2011; Negloh *et al.* 2011; Lima *et al.* 2012; Melo *et al.* 2015).

The predatory mite *Amblyseius aerialis* (Muma) was predominant in surveys in coconut plantations in the municipality of Moju, in the state of Pará, Brazil. It was found in almost the same proportion both on leaflets and fruits, mainly on the external surfaces and in lesser quantities under the bracts after the *A. guerreronis* attack (unpublished results). According to McMurtry *et al.* (2013), this predator is considered a type III generalist, as it feeds on a wide variety of prey and pollen of different plant species as complementary food sources, being found on more than 20 species of host plants throughout Brazil (Castillo and Noronha 2008; Demite *et al.* 2014; Amaral *et al.* 2018; Ferreira *et al.* 2018). This species is commonly found in the Amazon region in different crops, such as fruit trees (Mineiro *et al.* 2009; Ferreira *et al.* 2018), physic nut (*Jatropha curcas* L.) (Cruz *et al.* 2012), rubber tree (*Hevea brasiliensis* L.) (Nuvoloni *et al.* 2014), coconut (*C. nucifera*) (Cruz *et al.* 2015), nance (*Byrsonima crassifolia* (L.) Kunth) (Noronha *et al.* 2020) and oil palm (*Elaeis guineensis* Jacq.) (Cruz *et al.* 2019). However, there are no reports on the interaction between this species and the coconut mite in spite of its high abundance in this region.

The study of the functional and numerical responses of a predator represents an important step in determination of its ability to regulate pests (Filgueiras *et al.* 2020) providing relevant information about the predation rate and prey density (Solomon 1949), and its ability to convert food into eggs (Hassell 1978). Thus, our study evaluated the functional and numerical responses of this predator to different densities of *A. guerreronis*. Additionally, to determine the relative nutritional value of coconut pollen compared to *A. guerreronis* we assessed *A. aerialis* fecundity when offered coconut pollen, *A. guerreronis* and a mix of coconut pollen and *A. guerreronis*.

**Material and methods**

**Rearing of the predatory mite**

All bioassays were conducted in the Laboratory of Entomology of the Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa Amazônia Oriental), Belém, state of Pará, Brazil.

Colonies of the predatory mite, *A. aerialis*, were established from individuals collected from leaflets and fruits in commercial coconut plantations owned by Sococo S. A. Agroindústria da Amazônia, in the municipality of Moju, state of Pará (02°06′38.73″ S, 48°40′ 45.71″ W). The mites were kept in rearing units made of plastic trays (16 × 22 × 7 cm) containing a piece
of polyethylene foam (2 cm thickness) that was kept permanently moist by the daily addition of distilled water. Additionally, a 10 × 15 cm resin plate (Paviflex®) was laid on top of the foam piece, the edges of which were covered with cotton strips moistened with distilled water to prevent the mites from escaping. In the middle of the plate, pieces of cotton fibre were placed under a microscope coverslip (2 × 2 cm) to serve as a shelter, providing a place for the oviposition and development of the mites. The predators were fed daily with fresh coconut pollen, and 400 individuals of *A. guerreronis* in different stages were provided on perianth fragments (~1 cm³). The predators were transferred weekly to new rearing units kept in an incubator (25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, 12: 12 h L: D).

## Functional and numerical responses

The functional and numerical response experiment was conducted in an experimental unit composed of a Petri dish (2 cm high, Ø 5 cm) containing a disc of filter paper and a piece of coconut leaflet with the abaxial side facing up. All the edges of the coconut leaflet were surrounded with hydrophilic cotton moistened with distilled water to prevent the mites from escaping. In each experimental unit, one of five densities of *A. guerreronis* (40, 80, 160, 240 and 360 mites/experimental unit) were offered to one female of *A. aerialis* (four days old), replicated 20 times for each prey density. During two days the number of prey consumed and the number of eggs deposited by *A. aerialis* females were counted every 24h, with daily replacement of prey to the initial amount offered. Data from the first day were excluded to avoid the influence of previous feeding experience (Sabelis 1990, Carrillo and Peña 2012). Prey consumption was assessed by subtracting the number of *A. guerreronis* that remained in the arena from the number initially provided. The experiment was in random blocks and conducted in an incubator (25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, 12: 12 h L: D).

## Oviposition

The oviposition of the predator fed on three food sources, *A. guerreronis*, coconut pollen and a mixture of coconut pollen and *A. guerreronis* was investigated under the same environmental conditions used for the functional and numerical response. A mated female of *A. aerialis* (4 days old) was placed in each unit, and food sources (~240 *A. guerreronis* individuals, pollen (0.5 g) and mixture of ~240 *A. guerreronis* individuals + pollen (0.5 g)) was offered daily to each female. All the units were kept in an incubator (25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, 12:12 h L:D). The number of predator eggs laid in each replicate was recorded, and the eggs were removed daily for 11 days. Oviposition data from the first day were excluded to avoid the influence of previous feeding experience (Sabelis 1990, Carrillo and Peña 2012). The experiment was completely randomized, and for each food source, 20 females (replicates) were tested.

## Data analysis

### Functional and numerical responses

To determine the type of functional response (Type I, II or III), logistic regression curves were adjusted between the proportion of prey consumed and prey density, according to Juliano (1993). The type of functional response was determined by the significance and sign of the linear coefficient of the equations obtained for the proportions of prey eaten. Non-significant and linear coefficients indicate a type I response, negative and significant coefficients indicate a type II response, and positive and significant coefficients indicate a type III response (Holling 1959, 1961).

The parameters of attack rate (*a'*) and handling time (*Th*) were estimated by the equation $Ne = N_0\{1 - \exp[a'(ThNe - T)]\}$ (Rogers 1972) (for experiments without prey replacement) using nonlinear least-squares regressions. Here, Ne refers to the number of prey eaten; $N_0$, the initial prey density; *a'*, the attack rate (the proportion of prey captured by a predator per unit of
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** Functional response of *Amblyseius aerialis* fed with different densities of *Aceria guerreronis*, expression in number of prey consumed (a) and the proportion of prey eaten (b). In panel (a), the curve was fitted by Roger's equation III to the functional response, while in panel (b) the line represents the predicted values of Holling's type III disc equation.</figcaption></figure>

search time); and *Th*, the prey handling time (the time needed for a predator to capture, kill and digest the prey). All the statistical procedures were performed in SAS (SAS Institute 2018).

The numerical response was estimated through the polynomial regression of the number of eggs per *A. aerialis* female as a function of the prey density. The model was selected based on simplicity, parsimony and high values of F and $R^2$ using Table Curve 2D 5.01 software (Systat Software 2014).

## Oviposition

The oviposition rate data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test (HSD) to determine differences among the food sources. SAS software (2018) was used for the analyses.

## Results

### Functional and numerical responses

The number of prey consumed increased as availability increased (Figure 1a). The proportion of prey consumed initially increased under lower prey densities (40 and 80 mites) and decreased afterwards (Figure 1b), suggesting a type III functional response.

A type III functional response was confirmed by the significance and sign of the linear coefficient of Hollings's equation, which showed a significant and positive linear coefficient (Table 1). The attack rate (*a*') and the handling time (*Th*) of *A. aerialis* fed with *A. guerreronis* were 0.0011 h⁻¹ and 0.11 h, respectively (Table 2).

All prey densities offered allowed oviposition by *A. aerialis* females. The number of eggs laid increased with increasing prey density and stabilized at high densities (240 and 360), with an average oviposition rate of 1.7 ± 0.09 eggs/female (Figure 2). Therefore, these findings supported the following bioassays using only coconut mite as prey.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2** Mean number of eggs laid by *Amblyseius aerialis* females provided with different densities of *Aceria guerreronis*.</figcaption></figure>

## Oviposition

The mean number of eggs laid by *Amblyseius aerialis* females was not affected by food sources ($F_{2,53} = 1.97, P = 0.15$). The females fed on *Aceria guerreronis*, coconut pollen and a mixture of coconut pollen and *A. guerreronis* laid an average of 1.4, 1.4 and 1.6 eggs/female/day (respectively) during the 11-day oviposition period (data from the first day were excluded) (Figure 3).

## Discussion

The functional response of *A. aerialis* showed a sigmoid curve, indicating a type III response, i.e. an increase in prey consumption with prey density. In contrast, the proportion of prey eaten decreased with increasing density. However, according to Holling (1965), type III predators show a reduced response at low prey densities, unlike type II predators. Since the prey in this experiment was an eriophyoid and was smaller than other mites (approximately 200 µm in length), the consumption by the predators increased, as they need to ingest a greater quantity

<table><caption>**Table 1** Holling's equation and type of functional response of *Amblyseius aerialis* fed on different densities of *Aceria guerreronis*.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Species</th><th rowspan="2">Holling Equation</th><th rowspan="2">χ<sup>2</sup></th><th rowspan="2">DF</th><th rowspan="2">P</th><th colspan="4">Logistic regression coefficient</th><th rowspan="2">Type<sup>5</sup></th></tr><tr><th>I<sup>1</sup> (P)</th><th>L<sup>2</sup> (P)</th><th>Q<sup>3</sup> (P)</th><th>C<sup>4</sup> (P)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>A. aerialis</td><td>$$y = \frac{\exp(0.00000056x^2) - (0.00035x^2) + (0.053x) - 0.2015}{1 + \exp [(0.00000056x^2) - (0.00035x^2) + (0.053x) - 0.2015]}$$</td><td>223.91</td><td>96</td><td>&lt;.001</td><td>-0.2015 (0.27)</td><td>0.053 (&lt;.001)</td><td>-0.00035 (&lt;.001)</td><td>5.692e<sup>-7</sup> (&lt;.001)</td><td>III</td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote n="1">¹Intercept; ²Linear; ³Quadratic; ⁴Cubic; ⁵Type of functional response.</footnote>
<table><caption>**Table 2** Parameters (±SE) of functional responses of *Amblyseius aerialis* fed on increase densities of *Aceria guerreronis*.</caption><thead><tr><td>Parameter</td><td>Estimate (±SE)</td><td>CI (95%)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>a'</td><td>0.00119 ± 0.000250 h<sup>-1</sup></td><td>(0.000694 – 0.00168)</td></tr><tr><td>Th</td><td>0.1171 ± 0.00563 h</td><td>(0.1060 – 0.1283)</td></tr></tbody></table>

of *A. guerreronis* to meet their nutritional requirements; this phenomenon characterizes the potential regulation of the prey population. However, it is difficult for predators to reach *A. guerreronis* under bracts due to the tight adherence of the bracts to the surface of the fruit; this prevents larger mites, such as most Phytoseiids, from penetrating this space at the same time as eriophyoids (Silva *et al.* 2016). The predation of *A. guerreronis* by other generalist predators, such as *A. largoensis* and *E. alatus*, may occur on the exposed surface of fruits, on spikelets when mites leave older fruits for younger ones, when mites move from one plant to another by aerial dispersion, and rarely, under the bracts of a fruit (Melo *et al.* 2015).

The phytoseiid *N. baraki* showed a type III functional response when fed with different densities of *A. guerreronis* (Lima *et al.* 2012; Teodoro *et al.* 2020). Lima *et al.* (2012) reported a maximum mean consumption of ~100 mites at a density of 240 *A. guerreronis*, and Teodoro *et al.* (2020) reported a mean consumption of ~150 mites at the same density. In our study, we observed a mean consumption by *A. aerialis* of ~140 *A. guerreronis* at a density of 240 mites. Despite being different species of predators, our results showed a predation rate similar to those found by other authors and suggest that *A. aerialis* may be effective in controlling *A. guerreronis*.

The handling time and attack rate shown by *A. aerialis* feeding on *A. guerreronis* (0.0011 and 0.11, respectively) were close to the values reported by Teodoro *et al.* (2020) for *N. baraki*.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3** Average oviposition rates (eggs/female ± SE) by *Amblyseius aerialis* females given different food resources per 10 days.</figcaption></figure>
(0.004 and 0.13) feeding on the same prey species. The time required by *A. aerialis* to identify, attack, subdue, and consume a unit of prey (handling time) was lower. This indicates that this predator needed less time to consume a single prey, which increased its prey consumption over a 24 h period. The attack rate determines the ability of a predator to capture its prey within a specific area (Holling 1959), and our findings demonstrate that *A. aerialis* was effective in capturing more prey per area than *N. baraki*.

The predatory mite *Proctolaelaps bickleyi* (Bram) (Acari: Melicharidae) had a higher attack rate (0.1907) and a shorter handling time (0.0292) when provided with different densities of *A. guerreronis* (Lima *et al.* 2012). These values are better than those observed in our study, but the attack rate and handling time can change according to the predatory species and kind of prey.

The numerical response showed that even at lower prey densities (i.e., 40 and 80), *A. aerialis* could oviposit and that the number of eggs laid/day increased at high densities, indicating that the increment of individuals in the population will be greater as prey density increases. It is expected that to control pest mites, a good predatory mite should have, among other characteristics, the capacity to convert their prey into egg biomass and increase their population given abundant prey (Sabelis 1990). Galvão *et al.* (2007) reported a daily oviposition of 1.2 eggs per female for *A. largoensis* fed on *A. guerreronis*. *Amblyseius largoensis* is a natural enemy frequently found on coconuts and may also play a key role in the natural control of this pest. Lima *et al.* (2012) observed similar results for *N. baraki* fed on *A. guerreronis*. The mean number of eggs laid per day by *N. baraki* females at the highest density (140) was ~1.2. In our study, at a comparabler density (160 *A. guerreronis*), we observed a mean of 1.5 eggs laid per day. Thus, these results reinforce that *A. aerialis* can be effective in controlling *A. guerreronis*.

The possible benefit in the predator's fitness was verified by the daily oviposition of the predator *A. aerialis* (in the oviposition test when fed with *A. guerreronis* and coconut pollen). According to the classification by McMurtry *et al.* (2013), mites belonging to the genus *Amblyseius* genus have type III feeding habits, which are characterized by successful reproduction when feeding on a wide variety of prey, including mites of the Eriophyidae family. However, some species also successfully reproduce when feeding on pollen. The results obtained in this experiment are important, as they show that there was no difference in the predator's oviposition rate when fed coconut mites, coconut pollen or both. This generalist feeding habit may support the conservation of this predator in the field when prey is scarce feeding on coconut pollen.

This study represents the first effort to investigate the predatory and reproductive behaviours of *A. aerialis* on *A. guerreronis* through oviposition and predation activity. Our results suggest that this predator has the potential to control *A. guerreronis*. Moreover, the reproduction of *A. aerialis* is supported by either *A. guerreronis* or coconut pollen, suggesting that *A. aerialis* could be sustained under field conditions on coconut pollen as alternative food. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate life table parameters and to investigate under which circumstances *A. aerialis* can enter the microhabitat of *A. guerreronis*.

## Acknowledgements

We thank the Sococo S. A. Agroindústria da Amazônia company for financial support and the Amazon Research and Support Foundation (Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas - FAPESPA) for a scholarship granted to the first author.

## References

Amaral F.S.R., Lofego A.C., Cavalcante A.C.C. 2018. Oviposition rates of *Amblyseius aerialis* (Muma) and *Amblyseius chiapensis* DeLeon (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under seven foods different patterns for the same genus. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23: 795-798. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.5.1
Carrillo D., Peña J.E. 2012. Prey-stage preferences and functional and numerical responses of *Amblyseius largoensis* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to *Raoiella indica* (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 57: 361-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-011-9488-7

Castillo A.B., Noronha A.C.S. 2008. Estudio de los aspectos fundamentales de la biología de *Amblyseius aerialis* (Muma) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) en condiciones de laboratorio. CitriFrut., 25: 45-52.

Cruz W.P., Sarmento R.A., Teodoro A.V., Erasmo E.A.L., Pedro Neto M., Ignácio M., Ferreira Júnior D.F. 2012. Acarofauna em cultivo de pinhão-manso e plantas espontâneas associadas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012000300002

Cruz W.P., Krug C., Vasconcelos G.J.N., Moraes G.J. 2015. Diversity of mites associated with *Raoiella indica* (Acari: Prostigmata) on coconut palms in the central region of the Brazilian Amazonia, with emphasis on the predaceous Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 20: 875-886. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.20.8.4

Cruz W.P., Krug C., Vasconcelos G.J.N., Moraes G.J. 2019. Mite (Arachnida: Acari) diversity and abundance on oil palms in the central region of the Brazilian Amazonia. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 24: 1736-1750. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.9.10

Demite P.R., McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J. 2014. Phytoseiidae Database: a website for taxonomic and distributional information on phytoseiid mites (Acari). Zootaxa, 5: 571-577. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3795.5.6

Fernando L.C.P., Aratchige N.S. 2010. Status of coconut mite *Aceria guerreronis* and biological control research in Sri Lanka. In: Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Trends in acarology. Amsterdam: Springer. pp. 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9837-5_68

Ferreira C.T., Krug C., Garcia M.V.B., Moraes G.J. 2018. Leprosis mite and other mite species (Acari) associated to orange groves in Brazilian Central Amazon. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23: 449-462. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.3.4

Filgueiras R.M.C., Mendes J.A., Silva F.W.B., Sousa Neto E.P., Melo J.W.S. 2020. Prey stage preference and functional and numerical responses of *Neoseiulus barkeri* Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to eggs of *Raoiella indica* Hirst (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 25: 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.25.6.16

Galvão A.S., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Oliveira J.V.D. 2007. Biology of *Amblyseius largoensis* (Muma) (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a potential predator of *Aceria guerreronis* Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) on coconut trees. Neotrop. Entomol., 36: 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2007000300016

Galvão A.S., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Michereff E.S.J. 2008. Escala diagramática de dano de *Aceria guerreronis* Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) em Coqueiro. Neotrop. Entomol., 6: 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2008000600015

Galvão A.S., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Melo J.W.S. 2011. Distribution of *Aceria guerreronis* and *Neoseiulus baraki* among and within coconut bunches in northeast Brazil. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 54: 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-011-9464-2

Haq M.A., Sumangala K., Ramani N. 2002. Coconut mite invasion, injury and distribution. In: Fernando LCP, Moraes GJ, Wickramananda IR, editors. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coconut Mite (*Aceria guerreronis*). Sri Lanka: Coconut Research Institute: 41-49.

Hassell M.P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. 248 pp.

Holling C.S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist, 91: 385-398. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent91385-7

Holling C.S. 1961. Principles of insect predation. Annual Review of Entomology, 6: 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.06.010161.001115

Holling C.S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 97: 5-60. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9745fv

Juliano S.A. 1993. Nonlinear Curve Fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. New York: Chapman and Hall: 159-182.

Lawson-Balagbo L.M., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Hanna R., Schausberger P. 2007. Refuge use by the coconut mite *Aceria guerreronis*: fine scale distribution and association with other mites under the perianth. Biol. Control, 43: 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.010

Lawson-Balagbo L.M., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Hanna R., Schausberger P. 2008a. Exploration of the acarine fauna on coconut palm in Brazil with emphasis on *Aceria guerreronis* (Acari: Eriophyidae) and its natural enemies. Bull. Entomol. Research, 98: 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485307005421

Lawson-Balagbo L.M., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Hanna R., Schausberger P. 2008b. Compatibility of *Neoseiulus paspalivorus* and *Proctolaelaps bickleyi*, candidate biocontrol agents of the coconut mite *Aceria guerreronis*: spatial niche use and intraguild predation. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 45: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9156-8

Lima D.B., Melo J.W.S., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Moraes G.J. 2012. Limitations of *Neoseiulus baraki* and *Proctolaelaps bickleyi* as control agents of *Aceria guerreronis* Keifer. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 56: 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-012-9515-3

McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J., Famah Sourassou N. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.4.1

Melo J.W.S., Lima D.B., Staudacher H., Silva F.R., Gondim Jr M.G.C., Sabelis M.W. 2015. Evidence of *Amblyseius largoensis* and *Euseius alatus* as biological control agent of *Aceria guerreronis*. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 67: 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9963-7
Mineiro J.L.C., Silva W.R., Silva R.A. 2009. Ácaros em fruteiras e outras plantas no Estado do Amapá. Biota Neotropica, 9: 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032009000200009

Navia D., Godim Jr M.G.C., Aratchige N.S., Moraes G.J. 2013. A review of the status of the coconut mite, *Aceria guerreronis* (Acari: Eriophyidae), a major tropical mite pest. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 59: 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-012-9634-x

Negloh K., Hanna R., Schausberger P. 2011. The coconut mite, *Aceria guerreronis*, in Benim and Tanzania: occurrence, damage and associated acarine fauna. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 55: 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-011-9474-0

Noronha A.C.S., Mineiro J.L.C., Ferla N.J., Castro T.M.M.G., Silva G.L., Lofego A.C., Azevedo A.O. 2020. Mites associated with *Byrsonima crassifolia* (L.) Kunth (Malpighiaceae) in the state of Pará, Brazil. Entomol. Communications, 2: ec02026. https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec02026

Nuvoloni F.M., Lofego A.C., Rezende J.M., Feres R.J.F. 2014. Phytoseiidae mites associated with *Hevea* spp. from the Amazon region: A hidden diversity under the canopy of native trees. Syst. Biodiv., 13: 182-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2014.985344

Reis A.C., Gondim Jr. M.G.C., Moraes G.J., Hanna R., Schausberger P., Barros R. 2008. Population dynamics of *Aceria guerreronis* Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) and associated predators on coconut fruits in northeastern Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 37: 457-462. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X20080004000015

Rezende D., Melo J.W.S., Oliveira J.E.M., Gondim M.G.C. 2016. Estimated crop loss due to coconut mite and financial analysis of controlling the pest using the acaricide abamectin. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 69: 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0039-0

Rogers D. 1972. Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 41: 369-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3474

Sabelis M.W. 1990. How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition. Oecologia, 82: 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317473

SAS Institute. 2018. SAS/STAT User's guide, version 8.02, TS level 2 MO. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc.

Silva F.R., Moraes G.J., Lesna I., Sato Y., Vasquez C., Hanna R., Sabelis M.W., Janssen A. 2016. Size of predatory mites and refuge entrance determine success of biological control of the coconut mite. Biol. Control, 61: 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9751-2

Silva V.F, França G.V., Melo J.W.S., Guedes R.N.C., Gondim Jr. M.G.C. 2017. Targeting hidden pests: acaricides against the coconut mite *Aceria guerreronis*. Journal of Pest Science, 90: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0776-1

Solomon M.E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 18: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578

SYSTAT SOFTWARE. TABLE CURVE 2D (Trial Version 5.01). San Jose, 2014. Available from: https://systatsoftware.com/products/tablecurve-2d/tablecurve-2d-version-5-01-cumulative-patch/

Teodoro A.V., Oliveira N.N.F.C., Galvão A.S., Sena Filho J.G., Pinto-Zevallos D.M. 2020. Interference of plant fixed oils on predation and reproduction of *Neoseiulus baraki* (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on *Aceria guerreronis* (Acari: Eriophyidae). Biol. Control, 143: 104204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104204

Van Leeuwen T., Vontas J., Tsagkarakou A., Dermauw W., Tirry L. 2010. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite *Tetranychus urticae* and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol., 40: 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.05.008

Wickramananda I.R., Peiris T.S.G., Fernando M.T., Fernando L.C.P., Edgington S. 2007. Impact of the coconut mite (*Aceria guerreronis* Keifer) on the coconut industry in Sri Lanka. Cord., 23: 1-16.