# Achieving the Sensing, Smart and Sustainable
“Everything”

Dante Chavarría-Barrientos, Luis M. Camarinha-Matos, Arturo Molina

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Dante Chavarría-Barrientos, Luis M. Camarinha-Matos, Arturo Molina. Achieving the Sensing, Smart and Sustainable “Everything”. 18th Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (PROVE), Sep 2017, Vicenza, Italy. pp.575-588, 10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_51 . hal-01674904

HAL Id: hal-01674904

https://inria.hal.science/hal-01674904

Submitted on 3 Jan 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Achieving the Sensing, Smart and Sustainable
“Everything”

Dante Chavarría-Barrientos¹, Luis M. Camarinha-Matos² and Arturo Molina¹

¹ Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Science, 14380 Mexico City,
Mexico, {dante.chavarria, armolina}@itesm.mx

² Faculty of Sciences and Technology and Uninova – CTS, Nova University of Lisbon,
2829-516 Monte Caparica, Portugal, cam@uninova.pt

**Abstract.** The vast diversity of current sensing devices and mechanisms enable the creation of data-rich environments which gives the opportunity to create smart systems. The smartness of systems must transcend individual interests and fulfill collective aspirations and environmental needs. Therefore, new products, processes, enterprises, communities and any kind of systems must be envisioned as Sensing, Smart and Sustainable (S³). This paper discusses the trends and challenges for S³ applied to everything. Furthermore, it suggests that the knowledge produced in the field of collaborative networks might be used to leverage the S³ capabilities.

**Keywords:** Collaborative Networks, Sensing Systems, Smart Systems, Sustainability.

# 1 Introduction

The generalized use of technologies such as cloud computing, cyber-physical systems, big data analytics, and sensor systems lead to data-rich environments. In industry, these environments can promote an increase in productivity because they boost the creation of knowledge. Having access to the right information at the right time gives enterprises the ability to better compete and sustain their operations. Consequently, the idea of Sensing, Smart and Sustainable (S³) Enterprise was recently introduced [1]. The S³ Enterprise is concerned with the analysis and management of all data sources to feed smart systems that react rapidly and flexibly to environment changes. As a result, enterprises can become sustainable in the economic, social and environmental senses.

This research proposes the adoption of the S³ concepts not only in enterprises, but in any human-designed system, e.g. products, processes (business and manufacturing), communities and cities. We call this vision as the S³ of everything. The creation of S³ systems will promote and rely on collaboration, information access, open innovation, and sustainable development. However, the concept must be well studied to be adopted by practitioners.

As a contribution in this direction, this paper discusses the trends and challenges when developing the S³ of everything. Section 2 provides a definition of the S³
concept and a brief literature review of current approaches in developing these
systems. Section 3 introduces a list of challenges to make this vision a reality. Finally,
Section 4 describes the enablers while trying to identify further research
opportunities.

## 2 The S³ Concept: Sensing, Smart and Sustainable

The sensing enterprise, the smart organization and the sustainable enterprise are the concepts that give birth to the S³-Enterprise vision where the S³ concepts were used together for the first time. The sensing enterprise [2] can anticipate future decisions by using multidimensional information that enhances its global context awareness. The smart organization [3] is defined as an enterprise that is internetworked, knowledge driven, and therefore able to adapt rapidly in response to opportunities. Finally, the sustainable enterprise maintains its economic, social and environmental dimensions when it operates [4]. Fig. 1 tries to capture the S³ characteristics of generic systems based on such definitions. The conceptual model proposed details the S³ system definition, and each of the characteristics are explained next.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Fig.1. A conceptual model of a Sensing, Smart and Sustainable system</figcaption></figure>

Context-awareness is a key characteristic of any sensing system which refers to the acquisition of relevant information to make better decisions. The monitoring activities of any sensing system must be directed towards reliability and usability. Reliability guarantees the level of trust needed to make decisions based on information, while usability gives a purpose that helps designers in prioritizing monitoring efforts.

One of the associated goals when acquiring information is the foresight ability
which is proposed as a second characteristic of a sensing system. To anticipate its
future, the system must have a reasoning mechanism that makes inferences.
Predictions are enhanced when the information is captured in real-time. A smart
system is based on intelligent artefacts which imply the use of information to make
decisions. An autonomous cognitive reasoning facet is needed to use the information
effectively and efficiently. The intelligence is reflected in the way the system decides.

Internetworking is a characteristic of current smart systems that can be approached at two levels. At the external level, it refers to the collaboration with other systems whose interaction provides value to the system tasks. At the internal level, interconnectivity is used to provide integration of the system’s parts. Both levels suggest the creation of collaborative networks.

Using the internetworking and knowledge-based capacities, a smart system must be able to adapt to disruptions on its environment. The adaptability of a system can be enhanced by having a wide range of operating conditions or by having reconfigurability to change its type of operations to provide new capabilities. The first approach provides faster response times; however, it increases complexity.

The notion of sustainability is typically divided in three pillars. The economic dimension is maintained when the system produces more than what it costs. Therefore, the goals must be to minimize operational costs while increasing productivity or value generation. In addition, a sustainable system must participate in the co-creation of a world where humans survive and thrive. Being socially responsible is therefore an obligation. Finally, environment sustainability refers to a resource consumption rate that allows the environment to restore itself. Complementarily, the production rate of wastes must be less than the absorption capacity of the ecosystem. Collaborative networks have been discussed as a major pillar of sustainability implementation [5].

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 2. Some application areas for Sensing, Smart and Sustainable concepts</figcaption></figure>

As shown in Fig. 2, different application areas can be found for the deployment of
the S³ concept. Products, processes, enterprises, business environments, communities
and cities improve their functionality and behavior when they become Sensing, Smart
and Sustainable. Let us now have a closer look at each of them:
**S³ Products.** Customers want cheaper, personalized and innovative products with better quality and reliability [6]. The S³ products idea is an approach to satisfy these requirements. Miranda et al [7] have proposed the product model (See Fig. 3) for the S³ products based on different approaches such as smart products where computational technologies are utilized to join physical processes with cyber representations [8].

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 3. Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Product Model [7]</figcaption></figure>

These products have a mechatronics characteristic since they integrate mechanical, electronic and IT components. But they have more interaction with geographically distributed parts, and even relying on external components or services to provide product's functionality [9]. The sensing characteristic of S³ products involves all types of sensors which provide additional information to enhance context-awareness and self-description. The smartness characteristic is divided into the physical components, smart components and connectivity. For physical components, new smart materials need to be introduced to provide proactive behavior. The smart components, conformed by processing, storage and user interfaces, must be enhanced towards intelligent control, AI planning, and machine learning, in order to provide the product functionality in different conditions and following customers needs. Finally, the connectivity components are for interaction of the products with other products and different actors during the product lifecycle. The sustainable characteristic is realized by adopting sustainable product development which includes traditional product requirements criteria (economic, quality, market, technical feasibility) but adds environmental and social impacts [10]. Thus, the S³ products must produce
benefits such as reduced volume of hazardous material and raw material in general, reduced energy consumption and elimination/reduction of waste. For developing sustainable products, the lifecycle approach is currently used to measure their economic, social and environmental impacts [11]. Adding sustainable considerations to the Smart Product concept is a step towards S³ products.

**S³ Processes.** In todays’ world, innovation drives economy, therefore new products are being introduced at a faster and faster pace. The processes (manufacturing and business) need to adapt to this rate. We propose the S³ processes as solutions for the everchanging environment in the digital economy. Fig. 4 shows an S³ material transformation process using the morphological definition provided in [12] to illustrate what is expected in a S³ manufacturing processes. The processes should become smart and sensing, which implies that there is a continuous monitoring of operations which gives processes the ability to create the desired products in efficient and flexible ways [13]. The continuous monitoring and processing will be provided by the use the emerging technologies i.e. Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, Big Data, embedded systems. Autonomous cooperative elements will connect in situation dependant ways, conforming Cyber-Physical Production Systems [14]. The production processes used by most industries are not sustainable [15]. In fact, traditional industrial production is linked to environmental disruptions, such as global warming and pollution, and consumption of nonrenewable resources. However, in S³ processes, the energy and material utilizations should be minimized and the production waste reduced to almost zero seeking sustainable production [16]. Intelligent technologies for sustainable energy management are been developed to this end (energialab.com). These processes are related to the concept of Industry 4.0 where the cooperative interconnectivity will also affect the business processes and the data must be trusted without always knowing their origin. As a consequence, benefits such as scenarios anticipation, increased resources efficiency and reduced risks will be found [17]. Business and engineering processes in Industry 4.0 promote sustainability [18].

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4.** Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Material Processes</figcaption></figure>
**S³ Enterprises.** If enterprises want to thrive in the ever-changing business environments, they need to operate efficiently and adaptively. The S³ Enterprises [1] will achieve this through various mechanisms that promote sustainability. All type of sensors in all hierarchical levels of the Enterprise [19] will give the self-awareness needed to operate efficiently. Additionally, digitalization will be the mechanism that supports the foresight ability and transformation of enterprises by providing modularity and reconfigurability [20]. For becoming intelligent, model-based engineering and operation would guide the enterprise behavior. The concept of service is adopted as a building block that describes the operation of the enterprise providing reconfiguration capability. For heterogeneous supply networks, a core ontology will facilitate the exchange and interoperation of information systems. These systems can rely on intelligent autonomous agents that need executable models. The executable models will enable the creation of Enterprise Operating Systems [21], where enterprise operations are controlled and executed through computers. For sustainability, the indicators will include the fulfilment of survival and purpose needs of the socio-ecological system in which it is emerged [22]. According to the S³ vision, enterprises must follow the road to sustainable development by minimizing consumption (e.g. energy, goods, and water); maximizing societal and environmental benefit, rather than prioritizing economic growth; emphasizing delivery of functionality and experience, rather than product ownership; and promoting collaboration and sharing, rather than aggressive competition [23]. These goals should be pursued at each hierarchical level of the enterprise. Fig. 5 shows the hierarchical levels together with some sensing requirements and decisions to be considered in a S³ manufacturing enterprise.

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5.** Examples of what to sense and decide in a S³ Manufacturing Enterprise</figcaption></figure>
**S³ Business Ecosystems.** New business ecosystem should create a climate conductive to investments, innovation and entrepreneurship, which is supported by the progress of the ubiquitous and pervasive computing and networking, i.e. S³ Business Ecosystems. Fig. 6 illustrates the combination of concepts that define these ecosystems. For context awareness and foresight, these business environments will be in continuous contact with markets, harvesting opportunities and reacting to them. Social media in an important enabler to sense the customer preferences. In 2002, the European Commission coined the term Digital Business Ecosystem (DBE) referring to the achievement of innovation, openness, and sharing supported by a technical infrastructure to connect services and information among organizations [24]. DBE concept is applied to understand the interconnectivity of S³ business environment. Additionally, the ECOLEAD project [25] synthesized the ICT services (e-services) needed for the creation and operation of such ecosystems, facilitating dynamic creation of virtual enterprises, triggered by business opportunities. The services for the virtual enterprise include collaborative opportunity identification, partners search and suggestion, negotiation wizard (e-brokerage), CN modeler, decision support system, monitoring system, etc. To emphasize the collaborative aspects in business ecosystems, the term Collaborative Business Ecosystem was recently introduced [26]. For promoting intelligence and adaptivity, these environments are envisioned as Green Virtual Breeding Environment (GVBE) which is considered as an intelligent network of assets that are shared to create sustainable value [27]. This view of the GVBE gives the opportunity to consider business ecosystems as a bag of assets that must be assigned, monitored and managed by and in effective ways to save costs, co-create value, efficiently utilize resources and develop trust among Green Enterprises. The S³ HUB [28] acts as the mediator among enterprise assets and provider of e-services. The S³ HUB must also govern the sustainable issues of the Business Ecosystem. It should balance the cooperation and competition guaranteeing the health of all participants. Furthermore, it must verify that the environment and social impacts do not overcome the regeneration capacities. To this end, the HUB should promote the creation of a Circular economy, where all elements utilized are designed to reenter the biosphere safely.

**S³ Communities.** Communities are the keystone of society; therefore, it is important to apply the S³ concepts to them. The role of the Internet of Things (IoT) has been revised, giving birth to the concept of Smart Communities [29]. This concept is a first step in the definition of S³ Communities, however the goals go further. It is important to consider that we have rural and urban communities. As seen in Fig. 7, solutions to rural communities must address, at the individual level, access to health, nutrition, education and development of competencies to work. At community level, it is important to have access to low cost clean energy, potable water, efficient management of waste, and local production systems to create the conditions for a sustainable local economy. The solutions for these challenges include mobile learning, self-employment using ICTs, green products and processes, sustainable and green housing, waste disposal technologies, renewable technologies, telemedicine, nutraceuticals and bioprocess. For urban communities, the term S³ cities is proposed instead.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6.** A view of Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Business Ecosystems.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7.** Challenges and solutions for Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Communities (Rural).</figcaption></figure>

**S³ Cities.** These cities are defined based on the Smart city concept, and the ICT-enabled sustainable strategies (See Fig. 8). However, this is not the first time Smart and Sustainable cities have been defined. Hojer and Wangel [30] propose the term Smart Sustainable City as a “city that meets the needs of its present inhabitants without compromising the ability for other people or future generations to meet their needs, and thus, does not exceed local or planetary environmental limitations, and where this is supported by ICT.” The goal in S³ cities is to select the ICT investments that cause the greatest benefit to environment and society. The Internet of Things
must be used to provide Sensing as a service which promotes the development of activities such as waste management, smart agriculture and environmental management [31]. In addition, human interaction with technology should be monitored to provide a digital representation of the social phenomena [32]. The digital representation must be analyzed with Big Data technics to provide increasing quality of life. Seven core services have been enlisted as the components of the Smart City where the ICT-enabled intelligence can be applied to improve life quality [33] (i.e. city administration, education, healthcare, security, real state, transportation and utilities). In these cities ICT also improves sustainability by providing dematerialization, demobilization, mass customization, intelligent operation and soft transformation [34]. Effective materialization of these cities requires the involvement and collaboration of multiple public and private stakeholders.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 8.** Towards Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Cities (Urban Communities).</figcaption></figure>

## 3 Trends and Challenges

Despite the advances in different applications areas, the development of truly S³ systems is still a challenging and not yet fully understood task. Following the model proposed in Section 2, Table 1 shows some challenges and the status related to the deployment of S³. The status has been determined according to the literature review done in the previous section. The sensing challenges are mostly accomplished since current technologies allow collecting and keeping almost any type of data. This situation varies for the smartness-related challenges because often the “smart” label has been naively assigned to simple use of ICT. However, there is a need for further developments in smart facets, such as cognition and adaptability. Finally, the main challenge regarding sustainability is the ability to measure the impacts on society and environment to avoid partial and therefore incomplete approaches to sustainability. Current methods (e.g. Lifecycle assessment) need to be standardized and sharpened.
<table><caption>Table 1 – Trends and challenges in S³</caption><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Status</th><th>Trends and challenges</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Sensing</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Context-aware</td><td>●</td><td>-Raw sensor systems: There is available technology to sense almost any type of variable.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Foresight</td><td>●</td><td>-Data storage: Current solutions, such as cloud storage, provide the required capacity.</td></tr><tr><td>●</td><td>-Real-time: The latency of signal processing in smart sensors is sufficient for most applications.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Big data analytics: Current solutions offer reasonable results only when data is pre-organized and validated.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>○</td><td>-Predictions: Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning and simulation provide first approaches to predict systems behavior.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Smart</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Intelligent</td><td>●</td><td>-Common understanding: standards are a first approach, but core domain ontologies are needed to allow knowledge sharing.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Interconnected</td><td>●</td><td>-Effective AI: current intelligent systems have proved to provide the required precision needed in standard applications.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Flexible AI: current AI systems are focused on specific tasks; flexible reasoning systems are needed in seek of adaptivity.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Adaptive</td><td>●</td><td>-Physical Interconnectivity: ICTs allow communication in different scenarios using different resources.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Interoperability: hierarchical IT architectures need to be broken to allow a more open communication among system components.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Modularity: components must provide their functionality as on-demand services that can be accessed by both humans and bots.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>○</td><td>-Autonomy: an agile response depends on the ability of the system components to self-organize.</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Sustainable</strong></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Economic</td><td>●</td><td>-Value generation: Because technologies have a cost, the value propositions should overcome traditional proposals.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Environmental</td><td>●</td><td>-Economic assessment: Different KPIs and evaluation techniques are available to measure costs and profit of any system.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Green technologies: Alternative technologies are being developed to substitute harmful resources.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Social</td><td>○</td><td>-Environmental impacts assessment: Standards such as ISO 14000 are the first approach in getting universal measure for impacts.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>-Social developments technologies: ICTs have promoted varying benefits to societies providing wide access to services.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>○</td><td>-Social assessment. There is a need to define clear and universal measures of social impact.</td></tr></tbody></table>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

- Solved challenges

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

- Partially solved challenges

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

- Open challenges

# 4 Enablers to Achieve S³ Realization

## 4.1 S³ Technologies.

The main component that is leading to the conceptualization of S³ “things” is the advancement in ICTs and sensing technologies. These technologies alone (e.g. RFID, sensors, microprocessors and mobile networks) have the potential of supporting the S³ “things”. However, there is an aggregated version of such technologies that allow a
straightforward adoption of S³ concepts, i.e. S³ Technologies. These technologies are integrated hardware, software, and network technologies that provide real-time awareness, advanced analytics, collaboration capabilities and adaptability to help in intelligent and sustainable decision making. An example is the smart grid because it promotes the use of renewable energy using of real-time information to balance supply and demand [35]. The Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) is a key component that provides reliable, real-time data about each component of the power grid. The concept of Collaborative Smart Grid was recently introduced [36] to reflect a trend towards establishing collaborative networks among all stakeholders in a smart grid environment. Smart grids have enabled the creation of S³ communities and cities. There is a need for similar developments that impulse the implementation of S³.

## 4.2 S³ Collaborative Networks (CNs)

As mentioned above and already evidenced in current trends, the area of CNs is a key enabler for the realization of the S³ concept. In fact, all cases mentioned in Section 2 involve multiple entities – organizations / enterprises, people, smart machines, smart sensors, smart systems – which are typically heterogeneous, distributed, and with growing levels of autonomy. The “integration” and “interaction” of these entities – which are progressively more interconnected – into a consistent whole require effective collaboration among them in order to ensure proper (and desirably optimal) functioning.

Nevertheless, the full achievement of the S³ vision raises several challenges for the CN research community, including:

* *Interplay among diverse networks:* various networks, with different life cycles co-exist in the same environment – e.g. networks of machines and networks of organizations or networks of people - and the interplay among these networks needs to be better understood and supported.

* *Hybrid value systems:* in some cases, e.g. smart cities, and smart infrastructures, there are actors (public and private) with very different value systems along the value chain. Finding ways of combining those diverse value systems is necessary in order to ensure healthy global behaviors.

* *Culture / training:* some of the mentioned application domains are often addressed from very partial perspectives, e.g. from a technology-only perspective, requiring the creation of a CN culture and training the involved human actors with the already vast knowledge base of the CN discipline.

* *S³ KPIs:* a new set of performance indicators oriented to assess the level of S³-ness in each application domain needs to be developed.

## 5 Conclusions

The S³ of everything invites researchers to see the sensing and smart capabilities as a medium to achieve system sustainability. S³ characteristics as requirements for system design would allow the development of systems that thrive and survive in the ever-
changing world. This approach takes advantage of the technologies that are shaping
the digital era. Furthermore, the usual design goals are taken further through
considerations such as minimizing waste generation, enhancing working conditions,
improving social conditions, and promoting green societies.

For adopting the S³ conceptualization and setting the requirements of such systems, a generic description of each characteristic has been provided. This generic model is an initial step towards the construction of a formal and well-recognized vision of Sensing, Smart, and Sustainable everything. In addition, several challenges and their status have been introduced to guide and leverage research related to S³ everything. Furthermore, collaborative networks have been identified as a major vehicle for S³ realization. Nevertheless, the full realization of the vision requires further research. We expect that this preliminary work may encourage researchers to develop the area of S³ of everything into a recognized and active approach for systems development.

**Acknowledgments.** This research was partially funded by the CONACYT-SENER-Tec strategic alliance for energetic sustainability in Mexico and the Portuguese FCT-PEST program UID/EEA/00066/2013 (Impactor project).

References

1. Weichhart, G., Molina, A., Chen, D., Whitman, L. E. and Vernadat, F. 2016. "Challenges and current developments for Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Enterprise Systems." Computers in Industry, 79: 34-46.

2. Santucci, G., Martinez, C., and Vlad-Câlcic, D. 2012. The Sensing Enterprise. In: *Proceedings of FInES-Aalborg Workshop*, European Commission, DG CONNECT 02

3. Filos, E. 2006. "Smart Organizations in the Digital Age". In: *Integration of ICT in Smart Organizations* (I. Mezgar, editor), IGI Global: London, pp1-38.

4. Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., and Neumann, K. 2013. "Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models." *Organization and Environment* 26(3): 241-259.

5. Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Boucher, 2010. The Role of Collaborative Networks in Sustainability. In: *Collaborative Networks for a Sustainable World*, IFIP AICT Series 336/2010, Springer, pp. 1-16.

6. Penas, O., Plateaux, R., Patalano, S., & Hammadi, M. 2017. Multi-scale approach from mechatronic to Cyber-Physical Systems for the design of manufacturing systems. *Computers in Industry, 86*: 52-69.

7. Miranda, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, R., Borja, V., Wright, P.K., and Molina, A. 2017. Integrated Product, Process and Manufacturing System Development Reference Model to develop Cyber-Physical Production Systems – The Sensing, Smart and Sustainable Microfactory Case Study. IFAC-2017 World Congress, Toulouse France.

8. Lee, E. A. 2008. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In: 11th IEEE Int. Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), pp. 363-369. IEEE.

9. Mühlhäuser, M. 2007. Smart products: An introduction. In: European Conference on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 158-164. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg.

10. Maxwell, D., & Van der Vorst, R. 2003. Developing sustainable products and services. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 11(8): 883-895.

11. Gmelin, H., & Seuring, S. 2014. Determinants of a sustainable new product development. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 69: 1-9.
12. Todd, R. H., Allen, D. K., and Alting, L. 1994. Manufacturing processes reference guide. Industrial Press Inc.

13. Bott, T., Gerlinger, W., & Barth, J. 2015. Tailor Made Products by Smart Processes. *Macromolecular Reaction Engineering*, 9(5): 396-400.

14. Monostori, L. 2014. Cyber-physical production systems: roots, expectations and R&D challenges. *Procedia CIRP*, 17: 9-13.

15. Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L., & Bustamante, M. 2014. Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. *Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability*, 6: 8-14.

16. Kong, D., Choi, S., Yasui, Y., Pavanaskar, S., Dornfeld, D., and Wright, P. 2011. Software-based tool path evaluation for environmental sustainability. *Journal of Manufacturing Systems*, 30(4): 241-247.

17. Liebert, A. 2016. Industry 4.0—the intended impact of Cyber Physical Systems in a Smart Factory on the daily business processes: A Study on BMW (UK) Manufacturing Limited. www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:944759/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 27 Mar 2017)

18. Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. 2016. Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An outlook. *International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks*, 12(1): 1-10.

19. Jones, A. T., & McLean, C. R. 1986. A proposed hierarchical control model for automated manufacturing systems. *Journal of manufacturing systems* 5(1): 15-25.

20. Ramesh, R. 2016. Architecting Digital Transformation. *The Journal of Information Technology Management*, 29: 6-11.

21. Chen, D., Youssef, J. R., and Zacharewicz, G. 2015. Towards an Enterprise Operating System-Requirements for Standardisation. In: M. Zelm (eds.): Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Enterprise Interoperability, Nîmes, France, 27-05-2015, published at http://ceur-ws.org.

22. Parrish, B. D. 2007. Designing the sustainable enterprise. *Futures* 39(7): 846-860.

23. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., and Evans, S. 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. *Journal of cleaner production*. 65: 42-56.

24. Nachira, F., Dini, P., & Nicolai, A. 2007. A network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: roots, processes and perspectives. *European Commission, Brussels*.

25. Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., and Molina, A. 2009. Collaborative networked organizations—Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. *Computers and Industrial Engineering*. 57(1): 46-60.

26. Graça, P., Camarinha-Matos, L. M., 2017. Performance Indicators for Collaborative Business Ecosystems – Literature review and trends, *Technological Forecasting & Social Change*, 116: 237-255.

27. Romero, D., Noran, O., and Afsarmanesh, H. 2015. Green Virtual Enterprise Breeding Environments Bag of Assets Management: A Contribution to the Sharing Economy. In: Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks, pp 439-447, Springer

28. Molina, A., Mejia, R., Galeano, N., Najera, T., and Velandia, M. 2006. The HUB as an enabling IT strategy to achieve Smart Organizations. In: *Integration of ICT in Smart Organizations*. IGI Global: 68-100. http://www.digital-ecosystems.org/book/pdf/0.3.pdf

29. Li, X., Lu, R., Liang, X., Shen, X., Chen, J., and Lin, X. 2011. Smart community: an internet of things application. *IEEE Communications Magazine* 49(11).

30. Höjer, H., Wangel, J. 2015. Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In: ICT Innovations for Sustainability, pp. 333-349. Springer International Publishing.

31. Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. 2014. Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. *Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies*, 25(1): 81-93.
32. Sagl, G., Resch, B., & Blaschke, T. 2015. Contextual sensing: Integrating contextual information with human and technical geo-sensor information for smart cities. *Sensors*, 15(7): 17013-17035.

33. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N., and Nelson, L. E. 2009. Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. *Growth* 17(2): 1-17.

34. Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. 2014. Smart sustainable cities–Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. *Environmental modelling & software*, 56: 52-62.

35. Yan, Y., Qian, Y., Sharif, H., & Tipper, D. 2013. A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges. *IEEE communications surveys & tutorials*, 15(1): 5-20.

36. Camarinha-Matos, L. M., 2016. Collaborative Smart Grids - A survey on trends, *Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 65: 283-294.