# Lactate cross-talk in host-pathogen interactions

Alba Llibre, Frances Grudzinska, Matthew O'Shea, Darragh Duffy, David Thickett, Claudio Mauro, Aaron Scott

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Alba Llibre, Frances Grudzinska, Matthew O'Shea, Darragh Duffy, David Thickett, et al., Lactate cross-talk in host-pathogen interactions. Biochemical Journal, 2021, 478 (17), pp.3157-3178. 10.1042/BCJ20210263. pasteur-03375288

HAL Id: pasteur-03375288

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-03375288

Submitted on 12 Oct 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

PORTLAND
PRESS

## Review Article

# Lactate cross-talk in host-pathogen interactions

Alba Llibre¹,²*, Frances S. Grudzinska¹*, Matthew K. O'Shea³,⁴†, Darragh Duffy²,†, David R. Thickett¹,†,
Claudio Mauro¹,† and Aaron Scott¹,†

¹Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.; ²Translational Immunology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France; ³Department of Infection, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.; ⁴Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.

**Correspondence:** Alba Llibre (a.llibre@bham.ac.uk), Frances S Grudzinska (f.grudzinska@bham.ac.uk) or Claudio Mauro (c.mauro@bham.ac.uk)

OPEN ACCESS

Lactate is the main product generated at the end of anaerobic glycolysis or during the Warburg effect and its role as an active signalling molecule is increasingly recognised. Lactate can be released and used by host cells, by pathogens and commensal organisms, thus being essential for the homeostasis of host-microbe interactions. Infection can alter this intricate balance, and the presence of lactate transporters in most human cells including immune cells, as well as in a variety of pathogens (including bacteria, fungi and complex parasites) demonstrates the importance of this metabolite in regulating host-pathogen interactions. This review will cover lactate secretion and sensing in humans and microbes, and will discuss the existing evidence supporting a role for lactate in pathogen growth and persistence, together with lactate's ability to impact the orchestration of effective immune responses. The ubiquitous presence of lactate in the context of infection and the ability of both host cells and pathogens to sense and respond to it, makes manipulation of lactate a potential novel therapeutic strategy. Here, we will discuss the preliminary research that has been carried out in the context of cancer, autoimmunity and inflammation.

## Introduction

### Lactate and its production within the human body

Lactic acid ($C_3H_6O_3$) was first reported in sour milk in 1780 [1]. Lactate is the anion form of lactic acid and the main product generated at the end of anaerobic glycolysis [2,3] as well as of aerobic glycolysis in highly proliferative cells, also known as the Warburg effect [4]. In this cytosolic central metabolic pathway, one glucose molecule is broken down into two pyruvate molecules, which are converted into lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). In this process, ATP and NADH molecules are generated, creating usable energy for the cell. Lactate comprises two stereoisomers, D(-) lactate and L (+) lactate, which are metabolised by D-LDH and L-LDH, respectively [5]. Microbial species contain both LDH forms and can, therefore, produce both lactate isoforms, whereas in vertebrates L-LDH and consequently L-lactate prevail [6,7]. Lactate was originally considered a by-product of cell metabolism, however, there is increasing evidence that it can act as a signalling molecule impacting cell behaviour and function [8,9].

Within the human body, lactate is predominantly produced by muscle cells, erythrocytes and the brain, although most tissues are capable of lactate production under anaerobic conditions.

Lactate is present in the blood and tissues in healthy conditions at low concentrations (typically <2 mM) [10]. Pathological levels of lactate were first demonstrated in 1843 in the context of sepsis and haemorrhagic shock [11]; however, the association between hyperlactatemia (>4 mM) and poor outcomes in human disease was not described until 1964 [12].

Today, lactate is routinely measured and used as a biomarker for disease severity in critically ill patients [13]. However, clinical trials targeting clearance of lactate as a marker of resuscitation in sepsis have failed to demonstrate any benefit [14]. The aetiology of hyperlactataemia is mixed and

*These authors contributed equally — First authors.

†These authors contributed equally — Senior authors.

Received: 13 April 2021

Revised: 9 July 2021

Accepted: 12 July 2021

Version of Record published: 7 September 2021
<table><caption>Table 1. The estimated range of lactate levels in healthy and pathological human tissues</caption><thead><tr><td>Disease state</td><td>Lactate level (mM)</td><td>Reference</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Healthy tissue/blood</td><td>&lt;2</td><td>[10]</td></tr><tr><td>Empyema (human)</td><td>13.8</td><td>[20]</td></tr><tr><td>Inflammatory bowel disease (quiescent) (human)</td><td>4</td><td>[21]</td></tr><tr><td>Inflammatory bowel disease (active)</td><td>&gt;10</td><td>[21]</td></tr><tr><td>Bacterial meningitis (human)</td><td>13.6</td><td>[22]</td></tr><tr><td>Murine <i>S. typhimurium</i> infected gut lumen</td><td>11.7</td><td>[23]</td></tr><tr><td>Female genital tract in health</td><td>6</td><td>[24]</td></tr><tr><td>Burn wound exudate</td><td>3.19</td><td>[25]</td></tr><tr><td>Cystic fibrosis sputum (colonised but not exacerbating)</td><td>9</td><td>[26]</td></tr><tr><td>Blood derived macrophages infected with <i>M.tb</i></td><td>0.56–6.7</td><td>[27]</td></tr><tr><td>Saliva</td><td>0.3–1.3</td><td>[28]</td></tr><tr><td>Tumour tissue</td><td>30–40</td><td>[16,17]</td></tr></tbody></table>

dependent on individual circumstances in body compartments. Hypoxia and hypoperfusion (decreased blood flow) are the main causes of increased lactate, other contributing factors being hypermetabolism, and mitochondrial or liver dysfunction which impact clearance of lactate [15]. Tissue lactate concentrations are often many folds higher than blood lactate, a scenario seen in cancer and inflammatory settings where blood lactate is frequently normal, but tissue lactate may reach 15–40 mM [16–19] (Table 1). These tissue lactate concentrations in solid tumours were measured using mass spectrometry [16] and imaging bioluminescence (measurements in µmol/g) [19], followed by conversion to mM considering the tumour water content [18].

The human body is a complex ecosystem, comprised of both human cells and microbial organisms, such as bacteria, viruses and fungi. Many of these commensals produce lactate as part of their life cycle. Important species include lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and enterococci [29,30]. Hence, we harbour lactate-producing bacteria, but also lactate-utilising bacteria [29,31]. Therefore, lactate can be produced and used by both human and commensal cells, creating a complex but necessary network for the homeostasis of host–microbe interactions. This delicate balance can be perturbed by infections, with invading pathogens also having the capacity to secrete, sense and use lactate [32].

## Lactate transporters and receptors

Lactate stereoselective transport across plasma membranes is mediated by six described solute carrier transporters that perform proton-lactate symport (monocarboxylate transporters: SLC16A1, SLC16A7, SLC16A8 and SLC16A3, also known as MCT1–4) and sodium-dependent transporters (SLC5A8 and SLC5A12, also known as SMCT1–2) [33,34]. Structurally, these transporters contain two six-helix bundles, which constitute their transmembrane domain [35]. Each transporter prefers import or export of lactate; however, the transport direction of both systems depends on the lactate gradient, favouring lactate import when extracellular lactate is high, such as in inflamed tissues. These transporters display extensive substrate specificity and also transport alternative monocarboxylic metabolites such as pyruvate or ketone bodies [34]. They differ in their expression pattern and lactate affinity, SLC16A7 (MCT2) has the highest affinity for lactate ($K_m \sim 0.7$ mM) [35] and is predominantly found in liver, kidney, testis and brain [34]. SLC16A8 (MCT3) is restricted to retinal pigment and choroid plexus epithelia, whereas high expression of SLC16A3 (MCT4) is observed in anaerobic and highly glycolytic tissues. SLC5A8 (SMCT1; high affinity) and SLC5A12 (SMCT2; low affinity) expression is enriched in the kidney, and present to a lesser extent in other body tissues such as the intestine, salivary and thyroid glands, brain and retina, and in small intestine and skeletal muscle, respectively [33,36–38]. Inhibitors targeting MCT1-4 transporters currently exist [39,40] and offer great therapeutic potential, as it will be discussed in the *Therapeutics* section.

Importantly, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR) have been described for lactate. These include GPR81 (HCAR1), which plays an active role in adipose tissue, muscle and brain [41–43], as well as GPR132, which is highly expressed in blood and immune cells, particularly macrophages, and promotes the M2-like phenotype [44–49].
<table><caption>Table 2. Expression of lactate transporters in human immune cells and pathogens</caption><thead><tr><th>Cell type</th><th>Lactate transporter</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">Macrophages</td><td>GPR132</td><td>[44]</td></tr><tr><td>GPR81</td><td>[56]</td></tr><tr><td>MCT1, MCT4<br>SLC5A12 (activated)</td><td>[51]</td></tr><tr><td>CD8+ T cells</td><td>MCT1</td><td>[8]</td></tr><tr><td>CD4+ T Cells</td><td>SLC5A12 (activated)</td><td>[8]</td></tr><tr><td>B cells</td><td>SLC5A12 (activated)</td><td>[51]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Dendritic cells</td><td>GPR81</td><td>[55]</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>[57]</td></tr><tr><td>Neutrophils</td><td>MCT1<br>MCT4<br>GPR81</td><td>[52,53,58]</td></tr><tr><td>Bacteria</td><td>Lactate permeases (LctP) (Gonococcus, Haemophilus and Lactic acid bacteria as examples)<br>Aquaglyceroporins (Lactobacillales)</td><td>[28,59,60]<br>[61]</td></tr><tr><td>Fungi</td><td>Jen transporters<br>Gpr1</td><td>[62–65]</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Parasites</td><td>FNT</td><td>[66] (P. falciparum)</td></tr><tr><td>Aquaglyceroporins</td><td>[67] (T. gondii)</td></tr><tr><td>TbPT0</td><td>[68] (T. brucei),<br>[69] (T. brucei)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Multiple lactate transporters are expressed in T cells and macrophages [50]. SCL16A1 and SLC16A3 (MCT1 and MCT4) have been identified in macrophages; SLC16A1 (MCT1) has also been described in the CD8+ T cell compartment, whereas CD4+ T cells mainly express SLC5A12 upon activation [8]. Activation of peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMCs) via stimulation of CD3 causes indirect up-regulation of SLC5A12 in CD14+ monocytes, and in CD19+ B cells at a lower level [51]. Furthermore, CD20+ B cells and CD68+ macrophages were confirmed to express SLC5A12 in inflamed tonsils [51].

Bone marrow-derived neutrophils predominantly express SLC16A3 (MCT4) and have low levels of SLC16A1 (MCT1) and GPR81 [52], with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activation or bacterial infection increasing expression of SLC16A3 [52]. Peripheral blood neutrophils also express SLC16A1 and SLC16A3 (MCT1 and 4) [53,54]. Antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages have been shown to express GPR81 [55–57] (Table 2).

## The role of lactate in the context of immunity

The combination of these lactate transporters and receptors in immune cells ensures a sensing capacity to a changing environment, such as in response to infection and inflammation. This enables the adaptation of immune cells to fluctuating environments, and ultimately permits the orchestration of an appropriate and effective immune response.

In bacteria, lactic acid and sodium lactate diffusion can be facilitated by different transporters (Table 2), including aquaglyceroporins, such as GlpF1 and GlpF4 [61], and lactate permeases, such as LctP [59]. Therefore, bacteria have evolved their own means for the import/export of lactic acid and/or sodium lactate, through a different mechanism to eukaryotes and often regulated by operons. The lactate-proton symporter Jen1 was first identified in *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* [62], and its ortholog has been reported in *Candida* species [63] (Table 2). They present a more diverse repertoire of lactate transporters, including the evolutionarily conserved receptor Gpr1 [64], which is essential for pathogen survival in certain host niches [65].

There has been relatively little investigation of how lactate impacts immune cell function in infection; however; there is a significant body of evidence of the diverse roles lactate plays in both cancer and inflammatory conditions [50]. All three conditions — infection, cancer and inflammation — are characterised by high lactate levels, and they frequently result in hypoxic and acidic environments [8,16,21]. The diverse roles of
lactate in cancer and inflammatory settings have been well reviewed [50]. In brief, the impact of lactate varies according to cell type and disease state. Particularly, effector functions and cytotoxicity are altered by lactate in T cells, macrophages, mast and epithelial cells [9]. In addition to cancer cells [4], stromal and immune cells also contribute to the establishment of a lactate-rich environment within tumours [70]. These conditions suppress immune responses and hence promote tumour growth [9].

The impact of lactate in the tumour microenvironment is outside the scope of this review and has been recently covered [9]. However, valuable lessons can be learned from the cancer field in terms of lactate's immunosuppressive function, which could be translated to hyperlactatemia in the context of infection and inflammation.

Both anti- and proinflammatory responses have been described in response to lactate [9]. Lactate can polarise immune cells to both tolerance states to aid immune evasion, and inflammatory phenotypes, which lead to persistence of inflammation. In cancer cells, an association between GPR81 signalling and up-regulation of PD-L1 was shown, resulting in reduced T cell effector function and proliferation [71]. Although most cancer literature points towards a suppression of immune cell function caused by lactate, evidence also exists for lactate enhancing CD8+ T cell cytotoxic capacity and delaying tumour growth [72]. In the myeloid compartment, high lactate concentrations reduce TNF secretion by human monocytes [73], while promoting M2 polarisation in tumour-associated macrophages [16]. Neutrophils are the first responders to inflammation, they are highly glycolytic and contribute to the accumulation of lactate during infection [52]. Murine studies of bone marrow-derived neutrophils have demonstrated that both LPS and *Salmonella typhimurium* infection induce glycolysis in neutrophils which then rapidly accumulate lactate. Mobilisation of neutrophils from the bone marrow is dependent on GPR81 signalling, and administration of sodium lactate results in recruitment of bone marrow neutrophils to peripheral blood and peritoneum suggesting potential for a positive feedback loop for lactate mediated neutrophil recruitment [52].

This review focuses on the role of lactate in host-pathogen interactions. We will discuss lactate release from human and pathogenic sources. We will examine how lactate impacts current anti-microbial treatments, and how targeting lactate sensing could be used therapeutically to influence infection outcomes.

# Lactate secretion
## In health and disease

In healthy conditions, lactate levels are usually <2 mM in blood and other bodily fluids [10]. Hyperlactataemia during infection results as a complex interplay of tissue hypoxia, enhanced lactate production by activated immune cells, and generation of lactate by both pathogenic and commensal bacteria, combined with reduced clearance of lactate due to hypoperfusion and impaired lactate shuttles [74]. Production of lactate by the human host varies significantly by cell type but is also heavily influenced by environmental factors. In the context of host-pathogen interactions, lactate secretion by immune cells varies hugely. Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocyte and are the first responders to infection. They heavily rely on glycolysis [75,76], while other immune cells have a more flexible metabolism depending on their environment and activation state [77]. Untangling whether lactate is host or pathogen derived is challenging. Many bacteria can produce and utilise both D- and L-lactate, whereas humans generally only produce and utilise L-lactate. In humans, only L-lactate is routinely measured in clinical practice, as D-lactate rarely reaches sufficient levels to cause disease [6].

# Lactic acid producing and utilising bacteria

Lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB) are the archetypal lactate producers and are the predominant contributors to gut lumen lactate levels [55,78]. LAB have long been recognised to promote host immunity [79] both in the gut mucosa and systemically; however, the mechanisms of this relationship remain to be elucidated. Whilst LAB are not frequently pathogenic in humans, important human pathogens such as *Streptococcus* and *Enterobacteriaceae* are included in this group [80].

In healthy individuals, lactate levels in the faeces are low, despite an abundance of LAB. The major lactate utilisers in the gut are beneficial *Clostridia* species [29]. *Clostridia* produce butyrate, the major fuel for colonocytes and in the absence of butyrate, colonocytes switch from fatty acid metabolism to glucose metabolism, increasing lactate in the gut lumen [32]. Loss of *Clostridia* species is associated with the use of antibiotics as well as infection with enteric pathogens such as *Salmonella enterica typhimurium* (S. typhimurium). Pathogens can take advantage of this dysbiosis and use the increased lactate to support their expansion [32], further
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

driving inflammation and lactate generation by host and pathogen. This is also seen in the female genital tract, which is also colonised by LAB [81]; dysbiosis of lactate utilising and producing strains in this body niche enables expansion of pathogens such as *Neisseria gonorrhoea* [82].

## Pathogens

Non-LAB bacteria are also capable of generating lactate as a product of their metabolism by fermentation of glucose or anaerobic respiration. Particularly notable bacteria capable of lactate production are *Staphylococcus aureus*, *Enterobacteria* and the LAB discussed above, although many more human pathogens are capable of generating lactate [83], as it will be detailed in the section *Lactate in non-bacterial pathogens*. In bacteria, lactate transport is controlled by lactate permease (LctP), a symporter that forms an operon with the LDH genes and is highly conserved across lactate utilising species [84].

The source of lactate at tissue sites is likely to vary depending on the degree of bacterial load and infiltration of immune cells, in addition to oxygen tension and availability of nutrients. For example, in an empyema, lactate levels are typically 13 mM [20] and similar levels are also seen in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with bacterial meningitis [22]. In these infections pleural fluid and CSF have significant neutrophilic infiltration and high bacterial burden, contributing to lactate production. These conditions — elevated neutrophil count and bacterial numbers — are also seen in sputum samples from patients with cystic fibrosis and respiratory infections where lactate levels correlate with neutrophil burden [26,85].

## Lactate in bacterial pathogens

### Mechanisms of lactate influence on microbial pathogenicity

The mechanisms by which lactate can be used to enhance microbial pathogenicity, including its impact on immune surveillance and pathogen growth/survival, the manipulation of oxygen metabolism, the switch from coloniser to invader pathogen and the resistance to complement-mediated killing are outlined in Figure 1.

*Mycobacterium tuberculosis* (*M.tb*) infection will be used as a specific example to illustrate how infection-induced host-derived lactate can change the extracellular milieu, impacting the pathogen's ability to survive and immune function (Figure 2).

### *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection

Lactate's role in manipulating both host and pathogen is exemplified by *M.tb* infection. The first target of *M.tb* is the alveolar macrophage (AM) [91]. Upon infection, macrophages switch their metabolism to glycolysis and pyruvate is reduced to lactate [92,93]. Lactate release from macrophages, stimulated with live H37Rv at 10 : 1 multiplicity of infection (MOI) for 24 h, was measured using a fluorescent coupled enzymatic assay [92]. Lactate secretion was also shown to be increased when human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) and AMs were infected with the live strains of *M.tb* H37Ra and H37Rv for 24 h [93]. In this case, macrophages were infected at MOI 1–5 bacilli/cell for 3 h and then extracellular bacteria were removed. This metabolic shift was shown to be required for host control of H37Ra *M.tb* replication, with CFU/ml measured 72 h post-infection.

Using galactose instead of glucose reduced the ability of the macrophage to control infection in hMDMs and hAM and 2-deoxyglucose had the same effect on mBMDM [93].

The importance of glycolysis in infection resolution has also been shown in an elegant comparison between AMs (which mainly rely on fatty acid oxidation) and interstitial macrophages (predominantly glycolytic), and their respective capacities to control bacterial burden [94]. C57BL/6 mice were intranasally inoculated with the Erdman *M.tb* strain at high CFUs (~1000).

Interestingly, extracellular flux analysis after 24 h infection of hMDM with H37Rv *M.tb* using MOI 5 : 1 promoted a general metabolic quiescent state, including decreased glycolysis [95]. This was further demonstrated using radiolabelled ¹³C-glucose and showing diminished ¹³C incorporation into several glycolytic intermediates [95]. Dead *M.tb* or Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) infections induced a glycolytic phenotype, suggesting that *M.tb* has evolved strategies to counteract this metabolic shift. Hackett *et al*. also showed that expression of glycolytic genes was increased when mBMDM were stimulated with heat-killed *M.tb* compared with live *M.tb* H37Ra, and that lactate secretion was also higher on mBMDMs and hMDMs treated with heat-killed *M.tb* compared with live *M.tb* (H37Ra/H37Rv and H37Ra, respectively). They also demonstrated that upon *M.tb* infection, microRNA-21 targets PFK-M, restricting host glycolysis [96].
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1. Mechanisms of lactate-driven bacterial pathogenesis.**</figcaption></figure>

Bacterial pathogens have been demonstrated to use lactate in multiple ways to enhance their pathogenicity. (1) *S. aureus* generated lactate polarises innate immune cells to an immunotolerant state allowing persistence of biofilms. (2) Lactate can be used as a sole carbon source by a variety of bacteria, or bacteria can use lactate as fuel to enhance growth [32,86]. Enhanced growth is seen in Pseudomonas and other bacteria. (3) Reactive oxygen species are a key bactericidal mechanism used by innate immune cells. Lactate enables bacteria to manipulate oxygen metabolism and thus evade killing, a key mechanism for the persistence of *S. aureus* [87]. (4) Many bacteria including *N. meningitidis* and *S. aureus* colonise the nasopharynx, and the ability to invade is crucial in the move to becoming pathogenic. Lactate utilisation genes have been demonstrated to be required for this step [88]. (5) Bacteria lacking lactate utilisation genes have reduced *in vivo* pathogenicity in a variety of animal models of infection, this has been shown for Neisseria species and *H. influenzae* [89]. (6) Complement-mediated killing is reduced in the presence of lactate, mediated by lactate permease [90]. Created using Biorender.com.

The current literature assessing the metabolic impact of *M.tb* infection in macrophages uses a variety of models and therefore drawing conclusive answers is challenging. Some of the reported differences are due to the use of murine versus hMDMs following different differentiation protocols, to different strains of live *M.tb*, dead *M.tb* or *M.tb* lysates, different MOIs and/or route and duration of infection.

A biphasic metabolic response for the infected macrophage has been proposed [97], based on transcriptomic analysis of published datasets, including C57BL/6 BMDMs infected with *M.tb* H37Rv [98], B6D2F1 BMDMs infected with *M.tb* CDC1551 or HN878 [99] and BALB/c BMDMs infected with *M.tb* HN878 [100]. This model proposes a first phase (4–8 h post-infection) characterised by a switch to glycolysis, which is
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Glycolysis is increased during *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection.</figcaption></figure>

Glycolysis is induced in the lungs of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* (*M.tb*) infected hosts, which results in lactate secretion. This increased in glycolysis upon *M.tb* infection has been shown in the lungs of guinea pigs, mice, rabbits, non-human primates and humans. Alveolar macrophages are the first *M.tb* cellular target and, inside them, lactate can be used by *M.tb* as a carbon source, enhancing pathogen survival and cell growth. Lactate can also be exported through different specific transporters, which results in the acidification of the extracellular milieu. This can promote an altered cytokine response as well as tissue destruction. Created using *Biorender.com*.

accompanied by HIF-1α expression, enabling M1 polarisation and the orchestration of an effective antimicrobial programme, including the production of pro-inflammatory effector molecules. In the second phase (24–48 h post-infection), macrophages transition towards mitochondrial oxidative metabolism with high TCA activity. The dampening of M1 polarisation allows increased *M.tb* survival and growth [97,101]. According to this biphasic model, important metabolic changes might be happening by ~24 h post-infection. It is, therefore, possible that measurements of lactate at this time point reflect previous macrophage engagement in glycolysis [92,93], while the strategies of *M.tb* to suppress glycolysis are already in place 24 h post-infection [95]. It is also possible that glycolytic genes are up-regulated at the transcript level, but *M.tb* has strategies in place to suppress glycolysis further down the line (i.e. at the protein level as shown by Hackett *et al.* [96]). In that case, transcriptional up-regulation of glycolytic genes and decreased glycolysis measured through extracellular flux analyses would not be incompatible. Also, extracellular flux studies [95] oppose the increased TCA activity 24 h post-infection showed using transcriptomic analysis [97].
RNA-sequencing analysis of *M.tb* H37Rv-infected mice demonstrated up-regulation of glucose transporters and glycolytic enzymes, including *Gapdh*, *Hk3* and *Ldha* in lung tissue [102]. They also showed increased levels of *HK3* and *LDHA* protein through immunohistochemical staining of *M.tb* infected mouse lungs. These two glycolytic enzymes partially co-localised with macrophages (IBA-1+) and T cells (CD3+). Using a rabbit aerosol infection model with *M.tb* HN878, Subbian and colleagues [103] showed up-regulation of gene transcripts related to the Warburg effect between 4 and 12 weeks post-infection, including some glucose transporters, glycolytic enzymes and monocarboxylate transporters [104]. Transcriptomics of lung granulomas from patients with active TB expressed increased Warburg-effect related genes in comparison with non-granulomatous portions of the same lung [104,105]. Furthermore, a recent study using a dual RNA-seq approach to investigate gene expression of both *M.tb* and the human host described a shift towards host glycolysis in TB sputa, in comparison with non-TB controls [106]. Thus, both at the transcript and protein levels and using different *in vivo* infection models and human data, the evidence points towards an increase in glycolysis in the lungs of *M.tb* infected hosts.

Further evidence of this metabolic shift towards glycolysis comes from lactate measurements. Mice infected with *M.tb* H37Rv via aerosols showed increased lactate in their lungs 4 weeks post-infection, measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [107]. Similar findings were reported in a guinea pig model of infection also infected with *M.tb* H37Rv and using NMR [108]. Here, up-regulation of lactate was described as infection progressed (from day 15 onwards) in granulomatous tissues. High-resolution mass spectrometry has been used to measure the mouse lung metabolome infected with *M.tb* H37Rv intratracheally. In this case, only marginal and moderate lactate increase was detected at 4- and 9-weeks post-infection, respectively [109]. The different infection route, as well as the dose of *M.tb* given (10-fold higher in the latter), may account for some of the observed differences. Interestingly, enhanced LDH levels were detected in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from TB patients [110,111].

The impact of lactate sensing on immune cell function in the context of *M.tb* infection has been limitedly studied. Preliminary studies suggest the enhanced killing of *M.tb* by human macrophages incubated with sodium *L*-lactate [112]. Enhanced lactate secretion also lowers tissue pH, and extracellular acidosis has been shown to promote tissue destruction and altered cytokine secretion, impacting the control of infection and patient survival in tuberculosis [113,114].

*M.tb* is also able to use lactate as a sole carbon source [115], and when actively replicating it is able to use lactate or pyruvate more efficiently than glucose [27]. *M.tb* has a preference for pyruvate as carbon source, up-regulation of *LDHA* in infected macrophages being a mechanism to prevent pyruvate access to the pathogen (and consequent growth) by converting it to lactate [116]. It has been shown that *M.tb* is able to grow in lactate concentrations of up to 44 mM in *in vitro* cultures [27], however, it has also been described that greater than 20 mM lactate inhibits *M.tb* growth [117]. Further confirming this, deletion of *ldh* (*lldD2*, Rv1872c) in *M.tb* is detrimental to growth in lactate containing media, suggesting potential lactate toxicity when *M.tb* cannot metabolise it. Inside the infected macrophage, lactate concentrations have been estimated to be between 0.56 and 6.7 mM [27]. The observed discrepancies may be explained by strain and/or culture conditions differences [27]. The TB granuloma and the tumour microenvironment share relevant similarities such as nutrients and oxygen gradients potentially leading to hypoxia (a driver of anaerobic glycolysis and lactate release) and nutrient scarcity in certain regions [118–120]. As discussed previously, lung tissue from *M.tb* infected hosts present evidence of high glycolytic rates and lactate production. These factors impact pathogen survival [118,121] as well as immune cell function and infection resolution [112,122]. Furthermore, *M.tb* as an intra-cellular pathogen is commonly exposed to oxidative stress, and it is thought that lactate oxidation also plays a role in protecting *M.tb* from NO⁻ [117] by conversion to pyruvate and consequent NAD⁺ generation, which helps with redox control.

Genetic studies on *M.tb* strains point towards the presence of lactate in *M.tb* niches.

Both promoter and non-synonymous gene mutations have been identified in genomic analyses of *M.tb* lineage 4 genomes within the *lldD2* gene, encoding for *L*-lactate dehydrogenase. These mutations evolved independently more than 100 times and emerged in all continents. Furthermore, some of them promoted increased transmissibility [123]. Another study that analysed publicly available genomes from different lineages found evidence of positive selection in the *lldD2* gene [124], suggesting metabolic adaptations to lactate-rich environments. Supporting this same notion, the Colombian clinical isolate UT127 was shown to cope with scarce lipid availability by up-regulating *lldD2* (Rv1872c), suggesting the potential use of lactate as an alternative carbon source [125].
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

In summary, the evidence converges towards increased glycolysis and lactate release in the context of TB disease, with *M.tb* having developed efficient strategies to dampen this metabolic shift [95,96]. Due to the wide range of models and techniques used, it is still hard to define the precise kinetics of such metabolic rearrangements. Further investigation is also needed to specifically define when and where within the lung lesions glycolysis occurs, whether it happens in aerobic or anaerobic conditions [119], and its consequences in terms of lactate production, immune function and infection resolution. It is also possible that glycolysis and lactate production happen in immune cells other than macrophages during *M.tb* infection. For instance, neutrophilic infiltration is a well-described phenomenon in TB lung lesions [126,127], and neutrophils highly rely on glycolysis [52,75]. Also, switches towards glycolysis have been described in other lung cells including fibroblasts [128] and lung epithelial cells [129].

Lactate, therefore, acts at multiple levels of the host-pathogen interface and further investigation is required to fully elucidate its detrimental or beneficial effects in the ability of the macrophage to clear *M.tb* infection, and potentially identify new host-therapeutic targets [130–132]. There are limited studies exploring the role of lactate in other infection settings and disease states. Next, we discuss the evidence that exists for other organisms and the mechanisms employed.

## The impact of lactate on bacterial persistence in biofilms

In the field of cancer immunometabolism, lactate has been demonstrated to induce immunotolerance and enable cancer cells to evade detection. Similar mechanisms may support the development of chronic infection.

*Staphylococcus aureus* (*S. aureus*) is an important pathogen in human disease and can form biofilms, which are challenging to treat and require prolonged courses of antibiotics, particularly in infections of prosthetic material. Host-derived IL-10 is crucial for the maintenance of the biofilm with anti-inflammatory myeloid-derived suppressor cells and anti-inflammatory macrophages enabling biofilm persistence [133]. Lactate derived from *S. aureus* has been shown to regulate the inflammatory properties of the innate immune response and drive biofilm persistence. In a prosthetic joint infection model, *S. aureus* lacking *ldh* caused less bacterial burden and decreased levels of IL-10 [134]. IL-10 is also a potent suppressor of T cells [135]. The proposed mechanism is that lactate can inhibit histone deacetylase and therefore regulate gene expression in innate immune cells leading to the anti-inflammatory phenotype, high production of IL-10, thereby promoting the persistence of the biofilm. These findings could aid a better understanding of other biofilm infections that cause medical complications, such as *Mycobacterium abcessus* [136,137].

## Lactate promotes enhanced bacterial growth

As seen in *M.tb* lactate can be used as a sole carbon source, or as a combined fuel by many other microorganisms [86,138]. This flexibility can enhance bacterial growth compared with use of glucose alone. D and L-lactate are likely to be present during infection, and *Escherichia coli* (*E. coli*) and *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* can utilise them both [138,139]. Pseudomonas species in the context of biofilms have been demonstrated to cross-feed D-lactate produced by its own fermentation [139].

Within inflammatory compartments caused by infection, lactate is abundant. Several organisms have adapted to utilise lactate, and further drive inflammation to increase local lactate levels to support their expansion. In a murine model of *S. typhimurium* infection lactate reached 11.7 mM in the gut lumen [32]. This is thought to be driven by *S. typhimurium*-induced dysbiosis causing a switch in intestinal epithelial cell metabolism from fatty acid to glucose metabolism. The ability to oxidise lactate by *S. typhimurium* confers a fitness advantage in the gut, as lactate utilisation genes (*lldP*, *lldR* and *lldD*) are rapidly induced upon exposure to L-lactate [23]. The inflammation induced by expansion of *S. typhimurium* drives further dysbiosis and correlates with increased availability of lactate [32].

The female genital tract also has high levels of lactate (~6 mM) [24]. *Neisseria gonorrhoea* (*N. gonorrhea*) [140] is a common pathogen in the genital tract, that is able to utilise lactate as a sole fuel and can result in significant morbidity [140,141].

The flexibility to use varied carbon sources enables growth and success in different niches, as exemplified by *Neisseria meningitidis* (*N. meningitidis*). *N. meningitidis* can use lactate as a fuel when glucose is unavailable [24,82]. In bacterial meningitis, CSF glucose levels are initially high but fall rapidly, whereas lactate (13 mM) on average is replenished, presumably from glycolysis of activated immune cells and bacteria [22]. *N. meningitidis* growth is enhanced when lactate is added to glucose-containing media [142].
The ability to breakdown pyruvate to lactate and NADH has been shown to be beneficial for the growth of *Streptococcus pneumoniae* (S. pneumoniae). S. pneumoniae possesses a single copy of *ldh* [143]. Deletion of *ldh* abolishes lactate production entirely, and *ldh* mutants demonstrated 2.5-fold lower growth when glucose was the sole carbon source [144] compared with media containing glucose and galactose. The *ldh* mutant showed a shift to mixed acid fermentation rather than homolactic fermentation with accumulation of pyruvate [144].

*Pseudomonas aeruginosa* cultured in burn wound exudate rather than LB media demonstrated preferential use of lactate as a carbon source as compared with glucose. Lactate levels in the burn wound exudate were typically 3.19 mM [25] and declined over the 24 h culture period. *Pseudomonas*’ preference for lactate as a carbon source was confirmed in experiments where a cystic fibrosis like sputum media containing 9 mM lactate demonstrated superior growth [26] compared with conventional media.

## Manipulation of oxygen metabolism

Inflammatory nitric oxide (NO) is a crucial bactericidal mechanism for leukocytes. NO has a range of cytotoxic effects, however, certain bacterial species, such as *S. aureus* display resistance to NO. This resistance may play a role in the ability of *S. aureus* to persist and colonise the nasopharynx. Host-derived NO prevents aerobic respiration by *S. aureus* and induces fermentation of glucose, thereby generating significant levels of L-lactate. L-lactate is then converted to pyruvate generating NAD+, which is used to maintain redox balance in the face of NO. [87]. Additionally, *S. aureus* possesses NAD independent LDH (iLDH) which oxidises lactate to pyruvate with simultaneous reduction of the respiratory quinone pool [145]. Inactivation of *ldh1* impairs *S. aureus* growth in the presence of NO and, similarly, the *ldh1* mutant *S. aureus* had significantly reduced virulence in a murine model of sepsis. However, in mice lacking the ability to generate NO the virulence of the *ldh1* mutant was partially restored [87]. This was also replicated in a *S. aureus* mutant lacking iLDH or Lqo [145]. Suggesting that iLDH and LDH in *S. aureus* enables the pathogen to use host or pathogen-derived lactate to protect from exogenous NO. The bactericidal effect of NO are clearly abrogated in *S. aureus*, however, it is important to note NO is also able to influence bacteria by other cytotoxic mechanisms [146] which are not fully explained by this observation.

Competition between species and manipulation of oxygen metabolism has also been shown to enhance the survival of other bacteria. For example, *N. meningitidis* is able to utilise lactate derived from neutrophil glycolysis to enhance oxygen consumption and therefore reduce oxygen availability for bactericidal mechanisms by neutrophils [141].

## Ability to move from coloniser to invasive pathogen

*N. meningitidis* colonises the nasopharynx, and a crucial step in dissemination and its ability to cause invasive disease is the dispersal of micro-colonies, a process during which bacteria detach and access new sites. This has been shown in a nasal mucosa explant cell culture model to be dependent on both D- and L-lactate metabolism [88], as well as in isolated epithelial cells. It is important to consider that in single pathogen *in vitro* or *ex vivo* models there is invariably simplification of the complex interplay taking place *in vivo* with competition between pathogens and a rapidly changing immune environment, none the less it is increasingly clear that lactate plays an important role in pathogen virulence. A similar effect was seen in a different strain of *N. meningitidis* and *N. gonorrhea* [147]. It was confirmed that expression of lactate utilisation genes (*lctP*) is required for nasopharyngeal colonisation by *N. meningitidis* [88], despite the mutant having normal adhesion.

## Resistance to serum mediated killing

Complement-mediated killing is a crucial host bactericidal mechanism. Lactate is a key virulence factor in protection from complement-mediated killing in *N. meningitidis* as the presence of *lctP* is required for avoidance of serum-based killing [142]. The reduced virulence of the *lctP* mutant strain was restored to normal levels in the absence of serum complement [142]. *N. gonorrhea* has enhanced resistance to serum-based killing mediated by lactate metabolism, leading to enhanced LPS sialylation, independent of sialyltransferase, which prevents the bactericidal action of antibodies and complement [82].

*Haemophilus influenzae* strain b (Hib) demonstrates increased resistance to serum mediated killing when grown in either nasopharyngeal aspirate or human serum which contains lactate compared with lactate free culture media [90]. This phenotypic change was inducible by as little as 30 min incubation in human serum. The mechanism underlying this observation is unclear as it was shown that deletion of *lctP* did not affect survival in human serum [28]. However, these effects may be strain dependent as a strain of *lctP* mutated non-
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

typeable *H. influenzae* (NTHi) had impaired growth compared with a wild type strain, but again this was not replicated in a different NTHi strain [28]. Resistance to serum mediated killing could simply relate to a carbon source preference for lactate in *Hib* increasing growth velocity. Again it is important to acknowledge that these are *in vitro* findings when bacteria are cultured at densities exceeding those seen in human and animal infec- tions, with tightly regulated nutrient availability not reflecting true infection states.

## In vivo survival

*In vivo* survival is much more complex than the *in vitro* culture described above, and the central role of lactate utilisation has been demonstrated in animal models of infection. Loss of lactate utilisation genes reduces viru- lence, attenuates bacteria’s ability to colonise and results in less severe infection. *N. gonorrhea* can utilise both *D* and *L*-lactate, and lactate controls key virulence factors as loss of *ldh* and *lctP* results in decreased survival in cervical epithelial cells under microaerobic conditions [140].

*Ldh* mutant pneumococcus was unable to cause bacteriaemia in a mouse model of sepsis and mice had sig- nificantly longer survival compared with infection with wild type strains [144]. *lctP* mutant *N. meningitidis* has an attenuated ability to cause bacteriaemia compared with wild type strains in a rat model [142]. Signature tagged mutagenesis of *H. influenzae* identified *L*-lactate permease as crucial for *in vivo* survival [89]. *lctP* mutant *N. gonorrhea* has reduced ability to colonise the murine vagina compared with WT [82,148].

# Lactate in non-bacterial pathogens

## Viruses

Viruses are obligate parasites and there is no evidence of direct lactate sensing capacity. However, they often rely on endocytic pathways for cell entry in which a decrease in pH acts as a signal for host penetration [149]. In particular, the requirement for a drop in pH for viral fusion and entry has been described in multiple viruses such as the Semliki forest virus [150] and influenza [151,152]. In Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-derived lymphomas [153], EBV increases LDH-A expression and, consequently, lactate secretion by B lymphoma cells, resulting in down-regulation of viral microRNA promoting cancer growth. Viruses can also influence cellular processes such as metabolism to impose an environment that favours their replication [154,155]. Adenovirus infection of human cell lines HEK293 and 1G3 resulted in 2-fold and 4-fold increases of glucose consumption and lactate release, respectively [156,157]. Similar trends have been observed with Herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 [158,159], human CMV [158,160,161] and influenza [162–164]. Also, lactate limits retinoic-acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptor (RLR) signalling, diminishing type I interferon production and preventing viral clearance [165]. Lactate is directly sensed by the mitochondrial antiviral-signalling (MAVS) protein, blocking MAVS aggregation and downstream RLR signalling. Inactivating LDH-A, therefore, results in increased type I IFN secretion and protection of mice from viral infection. In summary, lactate is closely linked to viral infections, from viruses increasing LDH expression and lactate production, to lactate specifically targeting key proteins in antiviral signalling.

## Fungi

Recognition of fungal cell wall components triggers glycolysis in innate immune cells [166–169]. This metabolic adaptation has been described in response to *Candida albicans* [166–168], *Aspergillus fumigatus* [170] and *Cryptococcus gatti* [171] infection. The shift to glycolysis enables optimal immune responses through the release of proinflammatory cytokines [166,170]. The Jen transporters, which perform proton-lactate symport, are expressed in fungal species [62,63]. Pathogens such as Candida can use lactate as a carbon source to thrive in nutrient-restricted body niches such as the gut or the vagina [172]. The role of lactate in *C. albicans* infec- tion goes beyond nutrition, as lactate is directly involved in modulating pathogen-phagocyte interactions (Figure 3). Lactate increases biofilm formation, enhances resistance to different host-stressors and diminishes macrophage recognition [64,172,173]. β-glucan, a major cell wall component, can be masked after triggering by lactate which has been described as one of the key immune evasion strategies employed by *C. albicans* [64,174]. *C. albicans* grown with lactate as its main carbon source also impacted immune cell function increasing secre- tion of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10, while decreasing IL-17, which plays a key role in protection against invasive candidiasis [175,176].
C. albicans using glucose
as main carbon source

C. albicans using lactate
as main carbon source

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Lactate cross-talk between *Candida albicans* and phagocytic immune cells.</figcaption></figure>

The main pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in the recognition of *C. albicans* are C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expressed on the surface of innate immune cells with high phagocytic capacity (neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells). Sensing of *C. albicans* triggers a metabolic shift towards glycolysis, which is essential for the effective production and release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL1β and IL-6. Active glycolysis results in the production of lactate, which can be exported through different lactate transporters including MCT1, MCT4 and GPR81, depending on cell type (see Table 2). Once this lactate is in the extracellular milieu *C. albicans* can take it up through the Jen and Gpr1 transporters and use it to thrive in nutrient-restricted body niches. Lactate can not only be used as a carbon source, fuelling metabolic pathways such as the glyoxylate shunt, but it can also alter cell wall composition. These changes largely impact the ability of the host to mount an effective immune response. One of the best-described strategies is the masking of β-glucan, which results in decreased macrophage recognition and neutrophil recruitment. Furthermore, when *C. albicans* uses lactate as the main carbon source, biofilm formation, as well as resistance to antifungal drugs such as fluconazole, are increased. Created using *Biorender.com*.

## Parasites

Glycolysis is the preferred metabolic pathway for fulfilling the energy requirements of *Plasmodium falciparum*, the intra-erythrocytic parasite that causes malaria [177]. This process generates large quantities of lactate that is primarily expelled through pfFNT, a surface transporter of the formate-nitrite family [66]. Erythrocytes will in turn release lactate to the bloodstream through SLC16A1 (MCT1) [178]. *Toxoplasma gondii* is a major zoonotic pathogen that also relies on glycolysis for its growth, despite being metabolically versatile [179,180]. Several studies have shown how *Toxoplasma* LDH determines bradyzoite (slowly dividing phase) differentiation, virulence and chronic infection [179,181,182]. Whether lactate is directly implicated or whether these findings reflect the insufficiency of oxidative phosphorylation to meet the parasite's energetic requirements is still unknown. In general, the use of and response to lactate in parasites has not been well characterised in detail.
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4. Lactate directed host and pathogen therapeutic avenues.**</figcaption></figure>

Lactate directed therapeutics can be considered to target host or pathogen utilisation of lactate. In the host, vaccination of mice with recombinant *IctP* was partially protective against *N. meningitidis* bacteraemia. Supplementing germ-free mice with either *D*-lactate or LAB improved the phagocytic capacity of Kupffer cells in the liver preventing bacteriaemia. Inhibition of lactate utilisation tools such as MCT, LDH or the lactate receptor GPR81 has been demonstrated to improve viral clearance, reduce tumour burden while deletion of GPR81 increases susceptibility to inflammation. For pathogen directed therapies inhibition of lactate transporters prevents growth of plasmodium falciparum, and in other bacteria deletion of *IctP* causes reduced virulence *in vivo*. Lactate transporters are crucial for Candida to avoid antifungal drugs. *LctP*, lactate permease; LAB, lactic acid-producing bacteria; MCT, monocarboxylate transporters (lactate transporters in vertebrates) and LDH, lactate dehydrogenase. Created using *Biorender.com*.

However, there is abundant evidence of the evolutionary pressure for all these parasites to have effective lactate transport systems in place.

## Therapeutics

Human studies specifically modulating lactate in infection are scarce, however, research has been done regarding the therapeutic potential of targeting lactate in the context of cancer, autoimmunity and inflammation. The most common approaches include blocking specific lactate transporters, targeting LDH or adding lactate (Figure 4).

## Cancer therapeutics

The potential of MCTs and LDH inhibitors for cancer treatment has been reviewed elsewhere [9]. Both small compounds and RNA silencing strategies have been employed with promising results. For instance, the orally
dosed MCT inhibitor AZD3695 is undergoing phase I/II trials in lymphoma (NCT017915950). It is promising that modulators of lactate transport are in use in human studies, suggesting that safety and tolerability will soon be established to enable use in other human diseases. Furthermore, the use of shRNAs to knock down LDH-A resulted in decreased proliferation of tumour cells [183].

The use of oral MCT inhibitors in human studies of lymphoma are promising, but care needs to be taken in translating tolerability and safety to infection. Some infections are chronic and associated with immunosuppression, but initial stages of acute infection including sepsis are associated with overwhelming immune activation.

To begin to therapeutically target lactate we need to first understand the role lactate plays in the diverse infection settings in terms of host response, across organ systems and disease states to prevent inadvertent harm. Developing a clearer understanding of pathogens lactate utilisation but also symbionts may allow directed targeting of their specific transporters avoiding harm to the host.

## Autoimmunity and inflammation

The role of lactate as an immune modulator in inflammatory conditions is now well accepted. Studies in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model showed that silencing of SLC16A3 (MCT4) reduced the severity of arthritis [184]. Also, SLC16A3 (MCT4) transcripts were up-regulated in synovial fibroblasts from rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with osteoarthritis patients, and knockdown of SLC16A3 (MCT4) prevented their proliferation [184]. Furthermore, in other mouse models of arthritis and peritonitis, antibody, or shRNA blockade of SLC5A12 also reduced disease severity, which was accompanied by restored T cell function [8,51].

In sterile models of chemically induced hepatitis and pancreatitis, pre-treatment with lactate reduced inflammation by attenuating TLR induced inflammatory cytokines through GPR81 signalling [185]. The crucial role of lactate sensing by GPR81 was confirmed as deletion of GPR81 increased susceptibility of mice to chemically induced colitis, where GPR81 deficient mice had elevated inflammatory cytokines and up-regulation of inflammatory Th1/Th17 cells [78].

## Targeting lactate in the context of infection

Although the therapeutic potential of targeting lactate has not yet been explored in human clinical trials, evidence is accumulating and promising avenues are being investigated.

## Viral infection

The *in vivo* immunosuppressive action of lactate has been demonstrated: lactate is sensed by mitochondrial antiviral signalling proteins reducing RIG-I-like receptor activation to down-regulate type I interferon production providing an immunotolerant state in which the virus was able to evade immune surveillance [165]. Inhibition of LDHA reduced lactate and promoted viral clearance through up-regulation of type I interferon and other inflammatory cytokines [165]. Thus, targeting lactate could directly aid the orchestration of effective antiviral immune responses.

## Bacterial infection

As discussed in previous sections, some bacteria can use lactate as a carbon source. Therefore, targeting bacterial utilisation of lactate could potentially prevent the expansion of bacterial communities. Lactate utilisation genes are crucial for the virulence of many organisms, and targeting them with vaccination *in vivo*, or by *in vitro* inhibition seems to have some promise [186]. For instance, the expression of lactate permease (*lctP*) by *N. meningitidis* is crucial for its pathogenicity, and *lctP* has been explored for its potential as a vaccine target. Treatment of mice with recombinant *lctP* partially protected them from *N. meningitidis* bacteriaemia [186].

## Parasitic infection

Targeting lactate transport in parasites has also been trialled *in vitro*, where inhibition of formate-nitrate transporters impairs growth and leads to parasitic death in both *P. falciparum* and Toxoplasmosis [67,187]. Targeting lactate transporters in candida species could also offer therapeutic potential since they have been shown to aid *C. albicans* and *C. glabrata* in evading the effects of antifungal drugs [65,172].

Based on the reviewed evidence, a degree of immunosuppression induced by lactate in acute infection may be protective in preventing overwhelming inflammation-causing myocardial and associated organ damage. Alternatively, in chronic infections, the immunosuppressive effect of lactate may be more deleterious by allowing the virus to remain undetected and actively replicate. Further investigations are warranted to fully
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

understand the complex interplay between the pathogen and the host in terms of responses to lactate. Only then we will be able to target lactate and improve infection outcome.

## Beneficial role of lactate in host-pathogen relations

Evidence also exists for the beneficial roles of lactate. Specifically, in the context of bacterial derived lactate, there is a further challenge to be considered. LAB are the main producers of D-lactate in the gut. Dysbiosis occurs commonly in disease states and is associated with increased risk of sepsis and disseminated infection [188]. Giving critically ill patients probiotics containing LAB protects them from nosocomial acquired infection [189]. This link between loss of intestinal LAB and health is clear, but the mechanism that is able to impact distant immune cells remained unclear until recently [190]. The role of intestinal microbiota-derived D-lactate in maintaining crucial immune surveillance distant to the gut was demonstrated. In germ-free mice, the phagocytic capacity of Kupffer cells was significantly reduced, leading to the persistence of S. aureus bacteriaemia. Supplementing their diet with D-lactate partially restored the ability to clear bacteriaemia, and the same effect was demonstrated when gnotobiotic mice were supplemented with specific LAB which produced high levels of D-lactate. D-lactate levels were shown to be elevated in the gut, and portal vein, but not systemically. It is also important to note that although D-lactate played a crucial role, the phagocytic capacity was not fully restored, likely reflecting the contribution of other metabolites [190]. This study opens new avenues for using lactate itself as a therapeutic molecule.

Further characterisation of lactate utilisation in both symbiotic and pathogenic organisms, and the role of lactate on influencing host immunity during acute and chronic infection, will allow us to understand this complex interplay. Thus, it seems likely that manipulation of lactate in infection, whether host or pathogen derived, will require a balance between influencing pathogenic organisms, while enhancing the beneficial relationship with symbionts.

## Conclusion

In recent years, we have seen our understanding of lactate evolve from a mere by-product of cellular metabolism to an active signalling molecule playing an active role in cancer, inflammation and host-pathogen interactions. Curating a comprehensive view of the consequences of increased lactate concentrations in the context of infection and how this affects both pathogen and immune function is challenging. Lactate can be released by host cells, as well as pathogenic and commensal microbes. The precise impact of lactate on immune cell function seems to be context dependent, as it is mainly immune-suppressive in the tumour microenvironment, while it can favour chronic inflammation in other settings.

Several pathogenic microbial species have evolved mechanisms to use lactate that enhances their pathogenesis. The presence of lactate transporters in most human cells including immune cells, as well as in a wide range of pathogens including bacteria, fungi and complex parasites, is proof of the importance of this metabolite in regulating host and pathogen function in the context of infection. This makes lactate an attractive therapeutic target, and proof of concept studies have already been developed. We still require a deeper understanding of the role lactate plays in the complex interplay between commensals, pathogens, and the host before we can benefit from these potential novel therapeutic approaches.

## Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

## Funding

A.L. is supported by the European Commission (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018, 841729). F.S.G. is supported by The Dunhill Medical Trust (RTF1906\86). D.R.T. and A.S. report funding from the British Lung Foundation (PPRG16-12), the Medical Research Council (MR/S002782/1) and the Health Technology Assessment (NIHR129593). C.M. is supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/T016736/1) and by a Professorial Fellowship and Translational Funds from the University of Birmingham.

## Open Access Statement

Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of University of Birmingham in an all-inclusive Read & Publish pilot with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with JISC.
## Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Patricia Glynn and Dr. Martin Dedcoat for their critical reading of this manuscript.

## Abbreviations

AM, alveolar macrophage; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DCs, dendritic cells; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; GPR, G-protein-coupled receptors; Hib, *Haemophilus influenzae* strain b; hMDM, human monocyte-derived macrophage; iLDH, independent LDH; LAB, lactic acid-producing bacteria; LctP, lactate permease; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MAVS, mitochondrial antiviral-signalling; MOI, multiplicity of infection; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; NTHi, non-typeable *H. influenzae*; RLR, retinoic-acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptor.

## References

1 Scheele (1931) The collected papers of carl Wilhelm Scheele. *Nature* **128**, 1023–1024 https://doi.org/10.1038/1281023a0

2 Hume, D.A., Radik, J.L., Ferber, E. and Weidemann, M.J. (1978) Aerobic glycolysis and lymphocyte transformation. *Biochem. J.* **174**, 703–709
https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1740703

3 Levene, P.A., M.G. and Meyer, (1912) On the action of leucocytes on glucose. *J. Biol. Chem.* **11**, 361–3370 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258 (18)88742-7

4 Warburg, O., Wind, F. and Negelein, E. (1927) The metabolism of tumors in the body. *J. Gen. Physiol.* **8**, 519–530 https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.8.6.519

5 Wright, M.R. and Jamali, F. (1993) Methods for the analysis of enantiomers of racemic drugs application to pharmacological and pharmacokinetic studies. *J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods* **29**, 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/1056-8719(93)90044-F

6 Kowlgi, N.G. and Chhabra, L. (2015) D-lactic acidosis: an underrecognized complication of short bowel syndrome. *Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.* **2015**, 476215 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/476215

7 Petersen, C. (2005) D-lactic acidosis. *Nutr. Clin. Pract.* **20**, 634–645 https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426505020006634

8 Haas, R., Smith, J., Rocher-Ros, V., Nadkarni, S., Montero-Melendez, T., D'Acquisto, F. et al. (2015) Lactate regulates metabolic and pro-inflammatory circuits in control of T cell migration and effector functions. *PLoS Biol.* **13**, e1002202 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002202

9 Certo, M., Tsai, C.H., Pucino, V., Ho, P.C. and Mauro, C. (2020) Lactate modulation of immune responses in inflammatory versus tumour microenvironments. *Nat. Rev. Immunol.* **21**, 151–161 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0406-2

10 Kraut, J.A. and Madias, N.E. (2016) Lactic acidosis: current treatments and future directions. *Am. J. Kidney Dis.: Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found.* **68**, 473–482 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.04.020

11 Kompanje, E.J.O., Jansen, T.C., van der Hoven, B. and Bakker, J. (1843) The first demonstration of lactic acid in human blood in shock by Johann Joseph Scherer (1814–1869) in January 1843. *Intensive Care Med.* **33**, 1967–1971 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0788-7

12 Broder, G. and Weil, M.H. (1964) Excess lactate: an index of reversibility of shock in human patients. *Science (New York, NY)* **143**, 1457–1459
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3613.1457

13 Okorie, O.N. and Dellinger, P. (2011) Lactate: biomarker and potential therapeutic target. *Crit. Care Clin.* **27**, 299–326 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2010.12.013

14 Investigators, P., Rowan, K.M., Angus, D.C., Bailey, M., Barnato, A.E., Bellomo, R. et al. (2017) Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock - a patient-level meta-analysis. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **376**, 2223–2234 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701380

15 Andersen, L.W., Mackenhauer, J., Roberts, J.C., Berg, K.M., Cocchi, M.N. and Donnino, M.W. (2013) Etiology and therapeutic approach to elevated lactate levels. *Mayo Clin. Proc.* **88**, 1127–1140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.012

16 Colegio, O.R., Chu, N.Q., Szabo, A.L., Chu, T., Rhebergen, A.M., Jairam, V. et al. (2014) Functional polarization of tumour-associated macrophages by tumour-derived lactic acid. *Nature* **513**, 559–563 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13490

17 Hirschhaeuser, F., Sattler, U.G.A. and Mueller-Klieser, W. (2011) Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer. *Cancer Res.* **71**, 6921–6925 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1457

18 Goetze, K., Walenta, S., Ksiazkiewicz, M., Kunz-Schughart, L.A. and Mueller-Klieser, W. (2011) Lactate enhances motility of tumor cells and inhibits monocyte migration and cytokine release. *Int. J. Oncol.* **39**, 453–463 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2011.1055

19 Walenta, S., Wetterling, M., Lehrke, M., Schwickert, G., Sundfor, K., Rofstad, E.K. et al. (2000) High lactate levels predict likelihood of metastases, tumor recurrence, and restricted patient survival in human cervical cancers. *Cancer Res.* **60**, 916–921 PMID: 10706105

20 Chavalitlamrong, B., Angsusingha, K., Tuchinda, M., Habanananda, S., Pidatcha, P. and Tuchinda, C. (1979) Diagnostic significance of pH, lactic acid dehydrogenase, lactate and glucose in pleural fluid. *Respir. Int. Rev. Thorac. Dis.* **38**, 112–120 https://doi.org/10.1159/000194067

21 Hove, H. and Mortensen, P.B. (1995) Influence of intestinal inflammation (IBD) and small and large bowel length on fecal short-chain fatty acids and lactate. *Dig. Dis. Sci.* **40**, 1372–1380 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02065554

22 Genton, B. and Berger, J.P. (1990) Cerebrospinal fluid lactate in 78 cases of adult meningitis. *Intensive Care Med.* **16**, 196–200 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01724802

23 Gillis, C.C., Winter, M.G., Chanin, R.B., Zhu, W., Spiga, L. and Winter, S.E. (2019) Host-derived metabolites modulate transcription of salmonella genes involved in l-lactate utilization during gut colonization. *Infect. Immun.* **87**, e00773-18 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00773-18

24 Smith, H., Yates, E.A., Cole, J.A. and Parsons, N.J. (2001) Lactate stimulation of gonococcal metabolism in media containing glucose: mechanism, impact on pathogenicity, and wider implications for other pathogens. *Infect. Immun.* **69**, 6565–6572 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.11.6565-6572.2001

25 Gonzalez, M.R., Ducret, V., Leoni, S., Fleuchot, B., Jafari, P., Raffoul, W. et al. (2018) Transcriptome analysis of *pseudomonas aeruginosa* cultured in human burn wound exudates. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **8**, 39 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00039

26 Palmer, K.L., Aye, L.M. and Whiteley, M. (2007) Nutritional cues control *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. *J. Bacteriol.* **189**, 8079–8087 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01138-07
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

27 Serafini, A., Tan, L., Horswell, S., Howell, S., Greenwood, D.J., Hunt, D.M. et al. (2019) *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* requires glyoxylate shunt and reverse methylcitrate cycle for lactate and pyruvate metabolism. *Mol. Microbiol.* **112**, 1284–1307 https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14362

28 Lichtenegger, S., Bina, I., Roier, S., Bauernfeind, S., Keidel, K., Schild, S. et al. (2014) Characterization of lactate utilization and its implication on the physiology of *Haemophilus influenzae*. *Int. J. Med. Microbiol.* **304**, 490–498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.02.010

29 Duncan, S.H., Louis, P. and Flint, H.J. (2004) Lactate-utilizing bacteria, isolated from human feces, that produce butyrate as a major fermentation product. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **70**, 5810–5817 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.10.5810-5817.2004

30 Pessione, E. (2012) Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **2**, 86 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00086

31 Belenguer, A., Duncan, S.H., Holtrop, G., Anderson, S.E., Lobley, G.E. and Flint, H.J. (2007) Impact of pH on lactate formation and utilization by human fecal microbial communities. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **73**, 6526–6533 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00508-07

32 Gillis, C.C., Hughes, E.R., Spiga, L., Winter, M.G., Zhu, W., de Carvalho T, F. et al. (2018) Dysbiosis-associated change in host metabolism generates lactate to support Salmonella growth. *Cell Host Microbe* **23**, 54–64.e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.006

33 Srinivas, S.R., Gopal, E., Zhuang, L., Itagaki, S., Martin, P.M., Fei, Y.J. et al. (2005) Cloning and functional identification of slc5a12 as a sodium-coupled low-affinity transporter for monocarboxylates (SMCT2). *Biochem. J.* **392**(Pt 3), 655–664 https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20050927

34 Halestrap, A.P. (2012) The monocarboxylate transporter family–structure and functional characterization. *IUBMB Life* **64**, 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.573

35 Bosshart, P.D., Kalbermatter, D., Bonetti, S. and Fotiadis, D. (2019) Mechanistic basis of L-lactate transport in the SLC16 solute carrier family. *Nat. Commun.* **10**, 2649 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10566-6

36 Gopal, E., Umapathy, N.S., Martin, P.M., Ananth, S., Gnana-Prakasam, J.P., Becker, H. et al. (2007) Cloning and functional characterization of human SMCT2 (SLC5A12) and expression pattern of the transporter in kidney. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1768**, 2690–2697 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.06.031

37 Rodriguez, A.M., Perron, B., Lacroix, L., Caillou, B., Leblanc, G., Schlumberger, M. et al. (2002) Identification and characterization of a putative human iodide transporter located at the apical membrane of thyrocytes. *J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.* **87**, 3500–3503 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8797

38 Ganapathy, V., Thangaraju, M., Gopal, E., Martin, P.M., Itagaki, S., Miyauchi, S. et al. (2008) Sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters in normal tissues and in cancer. *AAPS J.* **10**, 193–199 https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9022-y

39 Puri, S. and Juvale, K. (2020) Monocarboxylate transporter 1 and 4 inhibitors as potential therapeutics for treating solid tumours: a review with structure-activity relationship insights. *Eur. J. Med. Chem.* **199**, 112393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112393

40 Payen, V.L., Mina, E., Van Hee, V.F., Porporato, P.E. and Sonveaux, P. (2020) Monocarboxylate transporters in cancer. *Mol. Metab.* **33**, 48–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2019.07.006

41 Rooney, K. and Trayhurn, P. (2011) Lactate and the GPR81 receptor in metabolic regulation: implications for adipose tissue function and fatty acid utilisation by muscle during exercise. *Br. J. Nutr.* **106**, 1310–1316 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511004673

42 Abrantes, H.d.C., Briquet, M., Schmuziger, C., Restivo, L., Puyal, J., Rosenberg, N. et al. (2019) The lactate receptor HCAR1 modulates neuronal network activity through the activation of galpha and gbetagamma subunits. *J. Neurosci.* **39**, 4422–4433 https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2092-18.2019

43 Morland, C., Lauritzen, K.H., Puchades, M., Holm-Hansen, S., Andersson, K., Gjedde, A. et al. (2015) The lactate receptor, G-protein-coupled receptor 81/hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 1: expression and action in brain. *J. Neurosci. Res.* **93**, 1045–1055 https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23593

44 Chen, Y.J., Mahieu, N.G., Huang, X., Singh, M., Crawford, P.A., Johnson, S.L. et al. (2016) Lactate metabolism is associated with mammalian mitochondria. *Nat. Chem. Biol.* **12**, 937–943 https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2172

45 Murakami, N., Hashidate, T., Harayama, T., Yokomizo, T., Shimizu, T. and Nakamura, M. (2009) Transcriptional regulation of human G2A in monocytes/macrophages: involvement of c/EBPs, Runx and Pu.1. *Genes Cells* **14**, 1441–1455 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01360.x

46 Chen, P., Zuo, H., Xiong, H., Kolar, M.J., Chu, Q., Saghatelian, A. et al. (2017) Gpr132 sensing of lactate mediates tumor-macrophage interplay to promote breast cancer metastasis. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **114**, 580–585 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614035114

47 Kern, K., Schafer, S.M.G., Cohnen, J., Pierre, S., Osthues, T., Tarighi, N. et al. (2018) The G2A receptor controls polarization of macrophage by determining their localization within the inflamed tissue. *Front. Immunol.* **9**, 2261 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02261

48 Parks, B.W., Gambill, G.P., Lusis, A.J. and Kabarowski, J.H. (2005) Loss of G2A promotes macrophage accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. *J. Lipid Res.* **46**, 1405–1415 https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M500085-JLR200

49 Bolick, D.T., Skaflen, M.D., Johnson, L.E., Kwon, S.C., Howatt, D., Daugherty, A. et al. (2009) G2a deficiency in mice promotes macrophage activation and atherosclerosis. *Circ. Res.* **104**, 318–327 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.181131

50 Certo, M., Marone, G., de Paulis, A., Mauro, C. and Pucino, V. (2020) Lactate: fueling the fire starter. *Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med.* **12**, e1474 https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1474

51 Pucino, V., Certo, M., Bulusu, V., Cucchi, D., Goldmann, K., Pontarini, E. et al. (2019) Lactate buildup at the site of chronic inflammation promotes disease by inducing CD4(+) T cell metabolic rewiring. *Cell Metab.* **30**, 1055–1074.e8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.004

52 Khatib-Massalha, E., Bhattacharya, S., Massalha, H., Biram, A., Golan, K., Kollet, O. et al. (2020) Lactate released by inflammatory bone marrow neutrophils induces their mobilization via endothelial GPR81 signaling. *Nat. Commun.* **11**, 3547 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17402-2

53 Merezhinskaya, N., Ogunwuyi, S.A., Mullick, F.G. and Fishbein, W.N. (2004) Presence and localization of three lactic acid transporters (MCT1, -2, and -4) in separated human granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes. *J. Histochem. Cytochem.* **52**, 1483–1493 https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.A46306.2004

54 Price, N.T., Jackson, V.N. and Halestrap, A.P. (1998) Cloning and sequencing of four new mammalian monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) homologues confirms the existence of a transporter family with an ancient past. *Biochem. J.* **329**(Pt 2), 321–328 https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3290321

55 Ranganathan, P., Shanmugam, A., Swafford, D., Suryawanshi, A., Bhattacharjee, P., Hussein, M.S. et al. (2018) GPR81, a cell-surface receptor for lactate, regulates intestinal homeostasis and protects mice from experimental colitis. *J. Immunol.* **200**, 1781–1789 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700604

56 Wang, L., He, H.W., Xing, Z.Q., Tang, B. and Zhou, X. (2020) Lactate induces alternative polarization (M2) of macrophages under lipopolysaccharide stimulation in vitro through G-protein coupled receptor 81. *Chin. Med. J. (Engl.)* **133**, 1761–1763 https://doi.org/10.1097/CMJ.0000000000000955
57 Brown, T.P., Bhattacharjee, P., Ramachandran, S., Sivaprakasam, S., Ristic, B., Sikder, M.O.F. et al. (2020) The lactate receptor GPR81 promotes breast cancer growth via a paracrine mechanism involving antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment. *Oncogene* **39**, 3292–3304 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-1216-5

58 Khatib-Massalha, E., Kumari, A., Golan, K., Massalha, H., Avemaria, F., Gur-Cohen, S. et al. (2017) Lactate release by bone marrow neutrophils promotes their inflammatory mobilization via endothelial GPR81 signaling. *Blood* **130**, 446 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17402-2

59 Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, G., Ju, J., Yu, B. and Wang, L. (2019) elucidating the role and regulation of a lactate permease as lactate transporter in *Bacillus coagulans* DSM1. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.* **85**, e00672-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00672-19

60 Ayala, J.C. and Shafer, W.M. (2019) Transcriptional regulation of a gonococcal gene encoding a virulence factor (L-lactate permease). *PLoS Pathog.* **15**, e1008233 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008233

61 Bienert, G.P., Desguin, B., Chaumont, F. and Hols, P. (2013) Channel-mediated lactic acid transport: a novel function for aquaglyceroporins in bacteria. *Biochem. J.* **454**, 559–570 https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20130388

62 Casal, M., Paiva, S., Andrade, R.P and Gancedo, C. The Lactate-Proton Symport of *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* is Encoded by JEN1 Downloaded from. 1999. Report No.: 00219193/99

63 Soares-Silva, I., Paiva, S., Kotter, P., Entian, K.D. and Casal, M. (2004) The disruption of JEN1 from *Candida albicans* impairs the transport of lactate. *Mol. Membr. Biol.* **21**, 403–411 https://doi.org/10.1080/09687860400011373

64 Ballou, E.R., Avelar, G.M., Childers, D.S., Mackie, J., Bain, J.M., Wagener, J. et al. (2016) Lactate signalling regulates fungal beta-glucan masking and immune evasion. *Nat. Microbiol.* **2**, 16238 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.238

65 Alves, R., Sousa-Silva, M., Vieira, D., Soares, P., Chebaro, Y., Lorenz, M.C. et al. (2020) Carboxylic acid transporters in candida pathogenesis. *mBio* **11**, e00156-20 https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00156-20

66 Marchetti, R.V., Lehane, A.M., Shafik, S.H., Winterberg, M., Martin, R.E. and Kirk, K. (2015) A lactate and formate transporter in the intraerythrocytic malaria parasite, *Plasmodium falciparum*. *Nat. Commun.* **6**, 6721 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7721

67 Erler, H., Ren, B., Gupta, N. and Beitz, E. (2018) The intracellular parasite *Toxoplasma gondii* harbors three druggable FNT-type formate and l-lactate transporters in the plasma membrane. *J. Biol. Chem.* **293**, 17622–17630 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.003801

68 Uzcategui, N.L., Figarella, K., Segnini, A., Marsiccobetre, S., Lang, F., Beitz, E. et al. (2018) *Trypanosoma brucei* aquaglyceroporins mediate the transport of metabolic end-products: methylglyoxal, D-lactate, L-lactate and acetate. *Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.* **1860**, 2252–2261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.09.008

69 Sanchez, M.A. (2013) Molecular identification and characterization of an essential pyruvate transporter from *Trypanosoma brucei*. *J. Biol. Chem.* **288**, 14428–14437 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.473157

70 Romero-Garcia, S., Moreno-Altamirano, M.M., Prado-Garcia, H. and Sanchez-Garcia, F.J. (2016) Lactate contribution to the tumor microenvironment: mechanisms, effects on immune cells and therapeutic relevance. *Front. Immunol.* **7**, 52 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00052

71 Feng, J., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Wei, H., Zhu, Z., Zhu, B. et al. (2017) Tumor cell-derived lactate induces TAZ-dependent up-regulation of PD-L1 through GPR81 in human lung cancer cells. *Oncogene* **36**, 5829–5839 https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.188

72 Rundqvist, H., Velica, P., Barbieri, L., Gameiro, P.A., Bargiela, D., Gojkovic, M. et al. (2020) Cytotoxic T-cells mediate exercise-induced reductions in tumor growth. *eLife* **9**, e59996 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59996

73 Mendler, A.N., Hu, B., Prinz, P.U., Kreutz, M., Gottfried, E. and Noessner, E. (2012) Tumor lactic acidosis suppresses CTL function by inhibition of p38 and JNK/c-Jun activation. *Int. J. Cancer* **131**, 633–640 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26410

74 Nolt, B., Tu, F., Wang, X., Ha, T., Winter, R., Williams, D.L. et al. (2018) Lactate and immunosuppression in sepsis. *Shock* **49**, 120–125 https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000958

75 Borregaard, N. and Herlin, T. (1982) Energy metabolism of human neutrophils during phagocytosis. *J. Clin. Investig.* **70**, 550–557 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110647

76 Sadiku, P., Willson, J.A., Ryan, E.M., Sammut, D., Coelho, P., Watts, E.R. et al. (2021) Neutrophils fuel effective immune responses through gluconeogenesis and glycogenesis. *Cell Metab.* **33**, 411–423.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2020.11.016

77 Makowski, L., Chaib, M. and Rathmell, J.C. (2020) Immunometabolism: from basic mechanisms to translation. *Immunol. Rev.* **295**, 5–14 https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12858

78 Lee, Y.S., Kim, T.Y., Kim, Y., Lee, S.H., Kim, S., Kang, S.W. et al. (2018) Microbiota-derived lactate accelerates intestinal stem-cell-mediated epithelial development. *Cell Host Microbe* **24**, 833–846.e6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.002

79 Wells, J.M. and Mercenier, A. (2008) Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. *Nat. Rev. Microbiol.* **6**, 349–362 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1840

80 Md, T., Huch, M., Cho, G.-S. and Franz, C.M.A.P. (2014) The genus Streptococcus. *Lactic Acid Bacteria*, Wilhelm H. Holzapfel and Brian J.B. Wood (eds), Ch. 28, 457–505 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118655252.ch28

81 Amabebe, E. and Anumba, D.O.C. (2020) Female gut and genital tract microbiota-induced crosstalk and differential effects of short-chain fatty acids on immune sequelae. *Front. Immunol.* **11**, 2184 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02184

82 Exley, R.M., Wu, H., Shaw, J., Schneider, M.C., Smith, H., Jerse, A.E. et al. (2007) Lactate acquisition promotes successful colonization of the murine genital tract by *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*. *Infect. Immun.* **75**, 1318–1324 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01530-06

83 Jurtshuk, P. 1996. Bacterial metabolism. In *Medical microbiology*, 4th edn (Baron, S., ed.), University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX

84 Jiang, T., Gao, C., Ma, C. and Xu, P. (2014) Microbial lactate utilization: enzymes, pathogenesis, and regulation. *Trends Microbiol.* **22**, 589–599 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.008

85 Fredman, G., Kolpen, M., Hertz, F.B., Petersen, P.T., Jensen, A.V., Baunbaek-Egelund, G. et al. (2019) The inflamed sputum in lower respiratory tract infection: l-lactate levels are correlated to neutrophil accumulation. *APMIS* **127**, 72–79 https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12913

86 Gao, C., Hu, C., Zheng, Z., Ma, C., Jiang, T., Dou, P. et al. (2012) Lactate utilization is regulated by the FadR-type regulator IIdR in *Pseudomonas aeruginosa*. *J. Bacteriol.* **194**, 2687–2692 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06579-11

87 Richardson, A.R., Libby, S.J. and Fang, F.C. (2008) A nitric oxide-inducible lactate dehydrogenase enables *Staphylococcus aureus* to resist innate immunity. *Science (New York, NY)* **319**, 1672–1676 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155207
88 Exley, R.M., Goodwin, L., Mowe, E., Shaw, J., Smith, H., Read, R.C. et al. (2005) *Neisseria meningitidis* lactate permease is required for nasopharyngeal colonization. *Infect. Immun.* **73**, 5762–5766 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.9.5762-5766.2005

89 Herbert, M.A., Hayes, S., Deadman, M.E., Tang, C.M., Hood, D.W. and Moxon, E.R. (2002) Signature tagged mutagenesis of *Haemophilus influenzae* identifies genes required for in vivo survival. *Microb. Pathog.* **33**, 211–223 https://doi.org/10.1006/mpat.2002.0530

90 Kuratana, M. and Anderson, P. (1991) Host metabolites that phenotypically increase the resistance of *Haemophilus influenzae* type b to clearance mechanisms. *J. Infect. Dis.* **163**, 1073–1079 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/163.5.1073

91 Cohen, S.B., Gern, B.H., Delahaye, J.L., Adams, K.N., Plumlee, C.R., Winkler, J.K. et al. (2018) Alveolar macrophages provide an early *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* niche and initiate dissemination. *Cell Host Microbe* **24**, 439–446.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.08.001

92 Lachmandas, E., Beigier-Bompadre, M., Cheng, S.C., Kumar, V., van Laarhoven, A., Wang, X. et al. (2016) Rewiring cellular metabolism via the AKT/mTOR pathway contributes to host defence against *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* in human and murine cells. *Eur. J. Immunol.* **46**, 2574–2586
https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201546259

93 Gleeson, L.E., Sheedy, F.J., Palsson-McDermott, E.M., Triglia, D., O'Leary, S.M., O'Sullivan, M.P. et al. (2016) Cutting edge: *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* induces aerobic glycolysis in human alveolar macrophages that is required for control of intracellular bacillary replication. *J. Immunol.* **196**, 2444–2449 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1501612

94 Huang, L., Nazarova, E.V., Tan, S., Liu, Y. and Russell, D.G. (2018) Growth of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* in vivo segregates with host macrophage metabolism and ontogeny. *J. Exp. Med.* **215**, 1135–1152 https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20172020

95 Cumming, B.M., Addicott, K.W., Adamson, J.H. and Steyn, A.J. (2018) *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* induces decelerated bioenergetic metabolism in human macrophages. *eLife* **7**, e39169 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39169

96 Hackett, E.E., Charles-Messance, H., O'Leary, S.M., Gleeson, L.E., Munoz-Wolf, N., Case, S. et al. (2020) *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* limits host glycolysis and IL-1beta by restriction of PFK-M via MicroRNA-21. *Cell Rep.* **30**, 124–136.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.015

97 Shi, L., Jiang, Q., Bushkin, Y., Subbian, S. and Tyagi, S. (2019) Biphasic dynamics of macrophage immunometabolism during *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection. *mBio* **10**, e02550-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02550-18

98 Rothchild, A.C., Sissons, J.R., Shafiani, S., Plaisier, C., Min, D., Mai, D. et al. (2016) MiR-155-regulated molecular network orchestrates cell fate in the innate and adaptive immune response to *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*. *Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **113**, E6172–E6E81 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608255113

99 Koo, M.S., Subbian, S. and Kaplan, G. (2012) Strain specific transcriptional response in *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infected macrophages. *Cell Commun. Signal.* **10**, 2 https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-10-2

100 Roy, S., Schmeier, S., Kaczkowski, B., Arner, E., Alam, T., Ozturk, M. et al. (2018) Transcriptional landscape of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection in macrophages. *Sci. Rep.* **8**, 6758 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24509-6

101 Rohde, K.H., Veiga, D.F., Caldwell, S., Balazsi, G. and Russell, D.G. (2012) Linking the transcriptional profiles and the physiological states of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* during an extended intracellular infection. *PLoS Pathog.* **8**, e1002769 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002769

102 Shi, L., Salamon, H., Eugenin, E.A., Pine, R., Cooper, A. and Gennaro, M.L. (2015) Infection with *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* induces the Warburg effect in mouse lungs. *Sci. Rep.* **5**, 18176 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18176

103 Subbian, S., Tsenova, L., Yang, G., O'Brien, P., Parsons, S., Peixoto, B. et al. (2011) Chronic pulmonary cavitary tuberculosis in rabbits: a failed host immune response. *Open Biol.* **1**, 110016 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.110016

104 Shi, L., Eugenin, E.A. and Subbian, S. (2016) Immunometabolism in tuberculosis. *Front. Immunol.* **7**, 150 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00150

105 Subbian, S., Tsenova, L., Kim, M.J., Wainwright, H.C., Visser, A., Bandyopadhyay, N. et al. (2015) Lesion-specific immune response in granulomas of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: a pilot study. *PLoS One* **10**, e0132249 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132249

106 Lai, R.P.J., Cortes, T., Marais, S., Rockwood, N., Burke, M., Garza-Garcia, A. et al. (2020) Transcriptomic characterization of tuberculous sputum reveals a host Warburg effect and microbial cholesterol catabolism. *bioRxiv*

107 Shin, J.H., Yang, J.Y., Jeon, B.Y., Yoon, Y.J., Cho, S.N., Kang, Y.H. et al. (2011) (1)H NMR-based metabolomic profiling in mice infected with *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*. *J. Proteome Res.* **10**, 2238–2247 https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101054m

108 Somashekar, B.S., Amin, A.G., Rithner, C.D., Troudt, J., Basaraba, R., Izzo, A. et al. (2011) Metabolic profiling of lung granuloma in *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infected Guinea pigs: ex vivo 1H magic angle spinning NMR studies. *J. Proteome Res.* **10**, 4186–4195
https://doi.org/10.1021/pr2003352

109 Fernandez-Garcia, M., Rey-Stolle, F., Boccard, J., Reddy, V.P., Garcia, A., Cumming, B.M. et al. (2020) Comprehensive examination of the mouse lung metabolome following *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection using a multiplatform mass spectrometry approach. *J. Proteome Res.* **19**, 2053–2070
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00868

110 Emad, A. and Rezaian, G.R. (1999) Lactate dehydrogenase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis. *Respiration* **66**, 41–45 https://doi.org/10.1159/000029335

111 Sharma, P.R., Jain, S., Bamezai, R.N. and Tiwari, P.K. (2010) Utility of serum LDH isoforms in the assessment of mycobacterium tuberculosis induced pathology in TB patients of Sahariya tribe. *Indian J. Clin. Biochem.* **25**, 57–63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-010-0012-3

112 Maoldomhaigh, C.Ó, Cox, D., McQuaid, K., Gogan, K., Basdeo, S. and Keane, J. (2020) Lactate improves killing of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* in human macrophages. *Access Microbiol.* **2**, 1 https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.mim2019-po0025

113 Whittington, A.M. (2017) *The Effect of Extracellular Acidosis on Tissue Destruction in Tuberculosis*, Imperial College London, London, UK https://doi.org/10.25560/76364

114 Malangu, N. and Mogashoa, M. (2012) Tuberculosis and lactic acidosis as causes of death in adult patients from a regional hospital in Johannesburg. *Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med.* **4**, 266 https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v4i1.266

115 Youmans, A.S. and Youmans, G.P. (1953) Studies on the metabolism of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*. III. The growth of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* var. hominis in the presence of various intermediates of the dissimilation of glucose to pyruvic acid. *J. Bacteriol.* **65**, 100–102 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.65.1.100-102.1953

116 Osada-Oka, M., Goda, N., Saiga, H., Yamamoto, M., Takeda, K., Ozeki, Y. et al. (2019) Metabolic adaptation to glycolysis is a basic defense mechanism of macrophages for *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection. *Int. Immunol.* **31**, 781–793 https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxz048
117 Billig, S., Schneefeld, M., Huber, C., Grassl, G.A., Eisenreich, W. and Bange, F.C. (2017) Lactate oxidation facilitates growth of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* in human macrophages. *Sci. Rep.* **7**, 6484 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05916-7

118 Qualls, J.E. and Murray, P.J. (2016) Immunometabolism within the tuberculosis granuloma: amino acids, hypoxia, and cellular respiration. *Semin. Immunopathol.* **38**, 139–152 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-015-0534-0

119 Cumming, B.M., Pacl, H.T. and Steyn, A.J.C. (2020) Relevance of the warburg effect in tuberculosis for host-directed therapy. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **10**, 576596 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.576596

120 Kiran, D. and Basaraba, R.J. (2021) Lactate metabolism and signaling in tuberculosis and cancer: a comparative review. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **11**, 624607 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.624607

121 Matta, S.K. and Kumar, D. (2016) Hypoxia and classical activation limits *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* survival by Akt-dependent glycolytic shift in macrophages. *Cell Death Discov.* **2**, 16022 https://doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.22

122 Prosser, G., Brandenburg, J., Reiling, N., Barry, III, C.E., Wilkinson, R.J. and Wilkinson, K.A. (2017) The bacillary and macrophage response to hypoxia in tuberculosis and the consequences for T cell antigen recognition. *Microbes Infect.* **19**, 177–192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2016.10.001

123 Brynildsrud, O.B., Pepperell, C.S., Suffys, P., Grandjean, L., Monteserin, J., Debech, N. et al. (2018) Global expansion of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* lineage 4 shaped by colonial migration and local adaptation. *Sci. Adv.* **4**, eaat5869 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat5869

124 Osorio, N.S., Rodrigues, F., Gagneux, S., Pedrosa, J., Pinto-Carbo, M., Castro, A.G. et al. (2013) Evidence for diversifying selection in a set of *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* genes in response to antibiotic- and nonantibiotic-related pressure. *Mol. Biol. Evol.* **30**, 1326–1336 https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst038

125 Baena, A., Cabarcas, F., Alvarez-Eraso, K.L.F., Isaza, J.P., Alzate, J.F. and Barrera, L.F. (2019) Differential determinants of virulence in two *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* Colombian clinical isolates of the LAM09 family. *Virulence* **10**, 695–710 https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2019.1642045

126 Lyadova, I.V. (2017) Neutrophils in tuberculosis: heterogeneity shapes the way? *Mediators Inflamm.* **2017**, 8619307 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8619307

127 Muefong, C.N. and Sutherland, J.S. (2020) Neutrophils in tuberculosis-associated inflammation and lung pathology. *Front. Immun.* **11**, 962 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00962

128 Bueno, M., Calyeca, J., Rojas, M. and Mora, A.L. (2020) Mitochondria dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming as drivers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. *Redox Biol.* **33**, 101509 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101509

129 Rahman, S.M.J., Ji, X., Zimmerman, L.J., Li, M., Harris, B.K., Hoeksema, M.D. et al. (2016) The airway epithelium undergoes metabolic reprogramming in individuals at high risk for lung cancer. *JCI Insight* **1**, e88814 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.88814

130 Hawn, T.R., Matheson, A.I., Maley, S.N. and Vandal, O. (2013) Host-directed therapeutics for tuberculosis: can we harness the host? *Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.* **77**, 608–627 https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00032-13

131 Hackett, E.E. and Sheedy, F.J. (2020) An army marches on its stomach: metabolic intermediates as antimicrobial mediators in *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* infection. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **10**, 446 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00446

132 Sheedy, F.J. and Divangahi, M. (2021) Targeting immunometabolism in host defence against *Mycobacterium tuberculosis*. *Immunology* **162**, 145–159 https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13276

133 Heim, C.E., Vidlak, D. and Kielian, T. (2015) Interleukin-10 production by myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to bacterial persistence during *Staphylococcus aureus* orthopedic biofilm infection. *J. leukoc. Biol.* **98**, 1003–1013 https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.4VMA0315-125RR

134 Heim, C.E., Bosch, M.E., Yamada, K.J., Aldrich, A.L., Chaudhari, S.S., Klinkebiel, D. et al. (2020) Lactate production by *Staphylococcus aureus* biofilm inhibits HDAC11 to reprogramme the host immune response during persistent infection. *Nat. Microbiol.* **5**, 1271–1284 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0756-3

135 Akdis, C.A. and Blaser, K. (2001) Mechanisms of interleukin-10-mediated immune suppression. *Immunology* **103**, 131–136 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01235.x

136 Qvist, T., Eickhardt, S., Kragh, K.N., Andersen, C.B., Iversen, M., Hoiby, N. et al. (2015) Chronic pulmonary disease with *Mycobacterium abscessus* complex is a biofilm infection. *Eur. Respir. J.* **46**, 1823–1826 https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01102-2015

137 Fennelly, K.P., Ojano-Dirain, C., Yang, Q., Liu, L., Lu, L., Progulske-Fox, A. et al. (2016) Biofilm formation by *Mycobacterium abscessus* in a lung cavity. *Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.* **193**, 692–693 https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201508-1586IM

138 Nunez, M.F., Kwon, O., Wilson, T.H., Aguilar, J., Baldoma, L. and Lin, E.C. (2002) Transport of L-Lactate, D-Lactate, and glycolate by the LldP and GlcA membrane carriers of *Escherichia coli*. *Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.* **290**, 824–829 https://doi.org/10.1006/brc.2001.6255

139 Lin, Y.C., Cornell, W.C., Jo, J., Price-Whelan, A. and Dietrich, L.E.P. (2018) The *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* complement of lactate dehydrogenases enables use of d- and l-lactate and metabolic cross-feeding. *mBio* **9**, e00961-18 https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00961-18

140 Chen, N.H., Ong, C.Y., O'Sullivan, J., Ibranovic, I., Davey, K., Edwards, J.L. et al. (2020) Two distinct L-lactate dehydrogenases play a role in the survival of *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* in cervical epithelial cells. *J. Infect. Dis.* **221**, 449–453 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz468

141 Britigan, B.E., Klapper, D., Svendsen, T. and Cohen, M.S. (1988) Phagocyte-derived lactate stimulates oxygen consumption by *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*. An unrecognized aspect of the oxygen metabolism of phagocytosis. *J. Clin. Investig.* **81**, 318–324 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI113323

142 Exley, R.M., Shaw, J., Mowe, E., Sun, Y.H., West, N.P., Williamson, M. et al. (2005) Available carbon source influences the resistance of *Neisseria meningitidis* against complement. *J. Exp Med.* **201**, 1637–1645 https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20041548

143 Tettelin, H., Nelson, K.E., Paulsen, I.T., Eisen, J.A., Read, T.D., Peterson, S. et al. (2001) Complete genome sequence of a virulent isolate of *Streptococcus pneumoniae*. *Science (New York, NY)* **293**, 498–506 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1061217

144 Gaspar, P., Al-Bayati, F.A., Andrew, P.W., Neves, A.R. and Yesilkaya, H. (2014) Lactate dehydrogenase is the key enzyme for pneumococcal pyruvate metabolism and pneumococcal survival in blood. *Infect. Immun.* **82**, 5099–5109 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.200205-14

145 Fuller, J.R., Vitko, N.P., Perkowski, E.F., Scott, E., Khatri, D., Spontak, J.S. et al. (2011) Identification of a lactate-quinone oxidoreductase in *Staphylococcus aureus* that is essential for virulence. *Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.* **1**, 19 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2011.00019

146 Schairer, D.O., Chouake, J.S., Nosanchuk, J.D. and Friedman, A.J. (2012) The potential of nitric oxide releasing therapies as antimicrobial agents. *Virulence* **3**, 271–279 https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.20328

147 Sigurlasdottir, S., Engman, J., Eriksson, O.S., Saroj, S.D., Zguna, N., Lloris-Garcera, P. et al. (2017) Host cell-derived lactate functions as an effector molecule in *Neisseria meningitidis* microcolony dispersal. *PLoS Pathog.* **13**, e1006251 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006251
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

148 Jerse, A.E., Crow, E.T., Bordner, A.N., Rahman, I., Cornelissen, C.N., Moench, T.R. et al. (2002) Growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the female mouse genital tract does not require the gonococcal transferrin or hemoglobin receptors and may be enhanced by commensal lactobacilli. *Infect. Immun.* **70**, 2549–2558 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.5.2549-2558.2002

149 Helenius, A. (2013) Virus entry: what has pH got to do with it? *Nat. Cell Biol.* **15**, 125 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2678

150 Helenius, A., Kartenbeck, J., Simons, K. and Fries, E. (1980) On the entry of Semliki forest virus into BHK-21 cells. Report No.: 00219525/80/02/0

151 Stegmannss, T., Booy, F.P. and Wilschutsii, J. (1987) Effects of low pH on influenza virus activation and inactivation of the membrane fusion capacity of hemagglutin. *J. Biol. Chem.* **262**, 17744–17749 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45442-7

152 Costello, D.A., Whittaker, G.R. and Daniel, S. (2015) Variations in pH sensitivity, acid stability, and fusogenicity of three influenza virus H3 subtypes. *J. Virol.* **89**, 350–360 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01927-14

153 Mo, X., Wei, F., Tong, Y., Ding, L., Zhu, Q., Du, S. et al. (2018) Lactic acid downregulates viral MicroRNA To promote Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized B lymphoblastic cell adhesion and growth. *J. Virol.* **92**, e00033-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00033-18

154 Plaza, J.J.G., Hulak, N., Kausova, G., Zhumadilov, Z. and Akiltzhanova, A. (2016) Role of metabolism during viral infections, and crosstalk with the innate immune system. *Intractable Rare Dis. Res.* **5**, 90–96 https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2016.01008

155 Thaker, S.K., Ch'ng, J. and Christofk, H.R. (2019) Viral hijacking of cellular metabolism. *BMC Biol.* **17**, 59 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0678-9

156 Silva AC, A.P.T. and MA, P. (2016) Impact of Adenovirus infection in host cell metabolism evaluated by (1)H-NMR spectroscopy. *J. Biotechnol.* **231**, 16–23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.025

157 Prusinkiewicz, M.A. and Mymryk, J.S. (2019) Metabolic reprogramming of the host cell by human adenovirus infection. *Viruses* **11**, 141 https://doi.org/10.3390/v11020141

158 Vastag, L., Koyuncu, E., Grady, S.L., Shenk, T.E. and Rabinowitz, J.D. (2011) Divergent effects of human cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus-1 on cellular metabolism. *PLoS Pathog.* **7**, e1002124 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002124

159 Abrantes, J.L., Alves, C.M., Costa, J., Almeida, F.C., Sola-Penna, M., Fontes, C.F. et al. (2012) Herpes simplex type 1 activates glycolysis through engagement of the enzyme 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase (PFK-1). *Biochim. Biophys. Acta* **1822**, 1198–1206 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.04.011

160 Landini, M.P. (1984) Early enhanced glucose uptake in human cytomegalovirus-infected cells. *J. Gen. Virol.* **65**(Pt 7), 1229–1232 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-65-7-1229

161 Munger, J., Bennett, B.D., Parikh, A., Feng, X.J., McArdle, J., Rabitz, H.A. et al. (2008) Systems-level metabolic flux profiling identifies fatty acid synthesis as a target for antiviral therapy. *Nat. Biotechnol.* **26**, 1179–1186 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1500

162 Ritter, J.B., Wahl, A.S., Freund, S., Genzel, Y. and Reichl, U. (2010) Metabolic effects of influenza virus infection in cultured animal cells: intra-and extracellular metabolite profiling. *BMC Syst. Biol.* **4**, 61 https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-61

163 Kohio, H.P. and Adamson, A.L. (2013) Glycolytic control of vacuolar-type ATPase activity: a mechanism to regulate influenza viral infection. *Virology* **444**, 301–309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.viroi.2013.06.026

164 Smallwood, H.S., Duan, S., Morfouace, M., Rezincioc, S., Shulkin, B.L., Shelat, A. et al. (2017) Targeting metabolic reprogramming by influenza infection for therapeutic intervention. *Cell Rep.* **19**, 1640–1653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.039

165 Zhang, W., Wang, G., Xu, Z.G., Tu, H., Hu, F., Dai, J. et al. (2019) Lactate is a natural suppressor of RLR signaling by targeting MAVS. *Cell* **178**, 176–189.e15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.003

166 Tucey, T.M., Verma, J., Harrison, P.F., Snelgrove, S.L., Lo, T.L., Scherer, A.K. et al. (2018) Glucose homeostasis is important for immune cell viability during candida challenge and host survival of systemic fungal infection. *Cell Metabo.* **27**, 988–1006.e7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.019

167 Quintin, J., Saeed, S., Martens, J.H.A., Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J., Ifrim, D.C., Logie, C. et al. (2012) *Candida albicans* infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. *Cell Host Microbe* **12**, 223–232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.006

168 Cheng, S.-C., Quintin, J., Cramer, R.A., Shepardson, K.M., Saeed, S., Kumar, V. et al. (2014) mTOR- and HIF-1-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. *Sci. Adv.* **345**, 1250684. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250684

169 Weerasinghe, H. and Traven, A.) Immunometabolism in fungal infections: the need to eat to compete. *Curr. Opin. Microbiol.* **58**, 32–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.07.001

170 Goncalves, S.M., Duarte-Oliveira, C., Campos, C.F., Aimananda, V., Ter Horst, R., Leite, L. et al. (2020) Phagosomal removal of fungal melanin reprograms macrophage metabolism to promote antifungal immunity. *Nat. Commun.* **11**, 2282 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16120-z

171 Rosa, R.L., Berger, M., Santi, L., Driemeier, D., Barros Terraciano, P., Campos, A.R. et al. (2019) Proteomics of Rat lungs infected by *Cryptococcus gattii* reveals a potential Warburg-like effect. *J. Proteome Res.* **18**, 3885–3895 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00326

172 Ene, I.V., Cheng, S.C., Netea, M.G. and Brown, A.J. (2013) Growth of *Candida albicans* cells on the physiologically relevant carbon source lactate affects their recognition and phagocytosis by immune cells. *Infect. Immun.* **81**, 238–248 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01092-12

173 Williams, R.B. and Lorenz, M.C. (2020) Multiple alternative carbon pathways combine to promote *Candida albicans* stress resistance, immune interactions, and virulence. *mBio* **11**, 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03070-19

174 Lopes, J.P., Stylianou, M., Backman, E., Holmberg, S., Jass, J., Claesson, R. et al. (2018) Evasion of immune surveillance in low oxygen environments enhances *Candida albicans* virulence. *mBio* **9**, e02120-18 https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02120-18

175 Gaffen, S.L., Hernandez-Santos, N. and Peterson, A.C. (2011) IL-17 signaling in host defense against *Candida albicans*. *Immunol. Res.* **50**, 181–187 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-011-8226-x

176 Bar, E., Whitney, P.G., Moor, K., Reis e Sousa, C. and LeibundGut-Landmann, S. (2014) IL-17 regulates systemic fungal immunity by controlling the functional competence of NK cells. *Immunity* **40**, 117–127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.002

177 MacRae, J.I., Dixon, M.W., Dearnley, M.K., Chua, H.H., Chambers, J.M., Kenny, S. et al. (2013) Mitochondrial metabolism of sexual and asexual blood stages of the malaria parasite *Plasmodium falciparum*. *BMC Biol.* **11**, 67 https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-67

178 Poole, R.C and Halestrap, A.P. N-Terminal protein sequence analysis of the rabbit erythrocyte lactate transporter suggests identity with the cloned monocarboxylate transport protein MCT1. *Biochem. J.* 1994. 303:755–759. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3030755

179 Xia, N., Zhou, T., Liang, X., Ye, S., Zhao, P., Yang, J. et al. (2018) A lactate fermentation mutant of toxoplasma stimulates protective immunity against acute and chronic toxoplasmosis. *Front. Immunol.* **9**, 1814 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01814

180 Shukla, A., Olszewski, K.L., Llinas, M., Rommereim, L.M., Fox, B.A., Bzik, D.J. et al. (2018) Glycolysis is important for optimal asexual growth and formation of mature tissue cysts by *Toxoplasma gondii*. *Int. J. Parasitol.* **48**, 955–968 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.05.013
181 Abdelbaset, A.E., Fox, B.A., Karram, M.H., Abd Ellah, M.R., Bzik, D.J. and Igarashi, M. (2017) Lactate dehydrogenase in *Toxoplasma gondii* controls virulence, bradyzoite differentiation, and chronic infection. *PLoS One* **12**, e0173745 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173745

182 Xia, N., Yang, J., Ye, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y., Zhao, J. et al. (2018) Functional analysis of toxoplasma lactate dehydrogenases suggests critical roles of lactate fermentation for parasite growth in vivo. *Cell Microbiol.* **20**, 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12794

183 Fantin, V.R., St-Pierre, J. and Leder, P. (2006) Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. *Cancer Cell* **9**, 425–434 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.023

184 Fujii, W., Kawahito, Y., Nagahara, H., Kukida, Y., Seno, T., Yamamoto, A. et al. (2015) Monocarboxylate transporter 4, associated with the acidification of synovial fluid, is a novel therapeutic target for inflammatory arthritis. *Arthritis Rheumatol.* **67**, 2888–2896 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39270

185 Hoque, R., Farooq, A., Ghani, A., Gorelick, F. and Mehal, W.Z. (2014) Lactate reduces liver and pancreatic injury in Toll-like receptor- and inflammasome-mediated inflammation via GPR81-mediated suppression of innate immunity. *Gastroenterology* **146**, 1763–1774 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.014

186 Sun, Y., Li, Y., Exley, R.M., Winterbotham, M., Ison, C., Smith, H. et al. (2005) Identification of novel antigens that protect against systemic meningococcal infection. *Vaccine* **23**, 4136–4141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.015

187 Hapuarachchi, S.V., Cobbold, S.A., Shafik, S.H., Dennis, A.S., McConville, M.J., Martin, R.E. et al. (2017) The malaria parasite's lactate transporter PfFNT is the target of antiplasmodial compounds identified in whole cell phenotypic screens. *PLoS Pathog.* **13**, e1006180 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006180

188 Freedberg, D.E., Zhou, M.J., Cohen, M.E., Annavajhala, M.K., Khan, S., Moscoso, D.I. et al. (2018) Pathogen colonization of the gastrointestinal microbiome at intensive care unit admission and risk for subsequent death or infection. *Intensive Care Med.* **44**, 1203–1211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5268-8

189 Manzanares, W., Lemieux, M., Langlois, P.L. and Wischmeyer, P.E. (2016) Probiotic and synbiotic therapy in critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *Critical care (London, England)* **19**, 262 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1434-y

190 McDonald, B., Zucoloto, A.Z., Yu, I.L., Burkhard, R., Brown, K., Geuking, M.B. et al. (2020) Programing of an intravascular immune firewall by the Gut microbiota protects against pathogen dissemination during infection. *Cell Host Microbe* **28**, 660–668.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.014