# Parasitic versus nutritional regulation of natural fish populations

Amélie Frantz, Marie-Elodie Perga, Jean Guillard

► To cite this version:

Amélie Frantz, Marie-Elodie Perga, Jean Guillard. Parasitic versus nutritional regulation of natural fish populations. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8 (17), pp.8713-8725. 10.1002/ece3.4391. hal-02621526

HAL Id: hal-02621526

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02621526

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Parasitic versus nutritional regulation of natural fish populations

Amélie Frantz<fnref n="1" />

Marie-Elodie Perga<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> ID

Jean Guillard<fnref n="1" /> ID

## Correspondence

Marie-Elodie Perga, Institute of Earth
Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne,
Lausanne, Switzerland
Email: marie-elodie.perga@unil.ch

## Abstract

Although parasites are expected to affect their host's fitness, quantitative proof for impacts of parasitism on wild populations is hampered by confounding environmental factors, including dietary resource. Herein, we evaluate whether the physiological conditions of European perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) in three large peri-alpine lakes (Geneva, Annecy, and Bourget) depend on (a) the nutritional status of the juvenile fish, as revealed by stable isotope and fatty acid compositions, (b) the prevalence of the tapeworm *Triaenophorus nodulosus*, a parasite transmitted to perch through copepod preys, or (c) interactive effects of both factors. At the scale of lake populations, the deficit in growth and fat storage of juvenile perch during their first summer coincides with a high parasite prevalence and also a low quality of dietary resource. Yet, at the individual level, parasites had no evident effect on the growth of the juvenile perch, while impacts on fat storage appeared only at the highest prevalence of the most infected lake. Fatty acid and stable isotope analyses of fish tissue do not reveal any impact of *T. nodulosus* on diet, physiology, and feeding behaviour of fish within lakes. Overall, we found a low impact of parasitism on the physiological condition and trophic status of juvenile perch at the end of their first summer. We find instead that juvenile perch growth and fat storage, both factors tied to their winter survival, are under strong nutritional constraints. However, the coinciding nutritional constraints and parasite prevalence of perch juveniles in these three lakes may result from the indirect effect of lake nutrient concentrations, which, as a major control of zooplankton communities, simultaneously regulate both the dietary quality of fish prey and the host-parasite encounter rates.

## KEYWORDS

allometric growth, fatty acid composition, food quality, lake phosphorus concentration, parasitism, *Perca fluviatilis*, stable isotopes, *Triaenophorus nodulosus*

<footnote n="1">¹UMR 042 CARRTEL, INRA – University
Savoie Mont Blanc, Thonon-les-Bains,
France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Institute of Earth Surface
Dynamics, University of Lausanne,
Lausanne, Switzerland</footnote>
# 1 | INTRODUCTION

Parasites, by definition, impose a cost on their hosts' resources, often affecting their life history traits (Combes, 2001). Impacts of parasitism at the individual host level are expected to cascade onto the host population dynamics, which, under the simplest scenario, will result in a decrease in the host population density. Despite a number of theoretical predictions and outputs from controlled experiments (Anderson & May, 1978; May & Anderson, 1978), empirical evidence that parasites can actually regulate wild populations and cycles in nature is scarce (but see Watson, 2013). Indeed, assessing the effective parasite check on natural populations is challenging as parasite impacts cannot be inferred from incidence rates alone and comparative evidence from infected and noninfected populations is difficult to obtain (Washburn, Mercer, & Anderson, 1991). Quantitative proof for impacts of parasitism on wild populations may also be hampered by the fact that most natural host populations are infected by multiple parasite species coupled with other confounding environmental factors (abiotic conditions, nutritional resources, competition, predation) which influence the host population as well (Decaestecker, Declerck, De Meester, & Ebert, 2005). However, a recent meta-analysis of 38 experimental studies on the cost of parasites from individual to population-level measures of natural, free-ranging hosts revealed an overall moderate but negative effect of parasites (Watson, 2013). Thus, the hypothesis that parasitism is a regulatory force on wild vertebrate host populations should be considered in population dynamics models (Lafferty, Dobson, & Kuris, 2006).

The next step is to test for and quantify the effective contribution of parasitism in natural population control and compare to trophic regulators, which are generally considered the drivers of the structure and dynamics of natural populations (Paine, 1980). Within this broader picture, the role of parasites may be more subtle than purely additive to the other drivers. Nutrition is a key environmental factor shaping immune defences and host susceptibility to infection (Scrimshaw, 1959 in Cornet, Bichet, Larcombe, Faivre, & Sorci, 2014). Changes in host nutritional status, in terms of both quantity and quality, can have profound repercussions on the dynamics of infectious diseases and moderate the consequences of the parasite on the host population dynamics (Aalto, Decaestecker, & Pulkkinen, 2015; Lange, Reuter, Ebert, Muylaert, & Decaestecker, 2014; Washburn et al., 1991). For instance, the regulatory role of the ciliate *Lambornella clarki* on the larval population of its mosquito host *Aedes sierrensis* has been shown, both in the laboratory and in the field, to vary with the availability of food resources (Washburn et al., 1991). When the host develops with sufficient food, the parasite effect is additive, increasing mortality and reducing populations. When hosts are food limited, however, effects shift to compensatory (no effect on host abundance) or compensatory (higher abundance of the hosts; Washburn et al., 1991). Along with food quantity, food quality might also affect the outcome of epidemics at the population level by its contradictory effects on both the host and parasite population dynamics (Aalto et al., 2015; Pulkkinen, Wojewodzic, & Hessen, 2014). For instance, high-quality food promotes the growth of *Daphnia dentifera* which, when infected by the fungus *Metschnikowia bicuspidata*,

produces more spores than hosts fed at lower food quality (Duffy et al., 2008). However, as infected hosts produce fewer offspring than uninfected individuals, the infection prevalence declines with the resource quality (Duffy et al., 2008). Besides, a better nutritional status of the host does not necessarily limit the parasite impact at individual — and population—scales. In a bird-malaria system, parasites more successfully controlled nonsupplemented birds, but hosts with a better nutritional status paid a higher cost of infection (Cornet et al., 2014). Therefore, interactions between epidemics and dietary components may result in contradictory population-level outcomes depending on the host-parasite model and environmental context (Aalto et al., 2015; Pulkkinen et al., 2014). The relative and potentially interacting effects of resource and parasitic controls on natural population dynamics need to be further investigated in the field.

To address this question, we focused on the life history traits of juvenile European perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) in three large peri-alpine lakes (Geneva, Annecy, and Bourget). The lakes are very similar in their history of fish populations, but vary in terms of both nutritional status and the prevalence of the tapeworm *Triaenophorus nodulosus*. In Lake Annecy, most of the young-of-the-year (YOY) perch die off during late autumn and consequently captures of 1 + fish are rare (Guillard, Perga, Colon, & Angeli, 2006). Perch recruitment, that is, fish surviving their first year, in the two other lakes is much higher (Hofmann & Raymond, 2014; Jacquet et al., 2015).

The lower winter survival for Lake Annecy YOY perch might result from two potentially interacting causes. The first hypothesis is nutritional limitation. All three lakes are currently under re-oligotrophication after a phase of human nutrient enrichment (i.e., eutrophication) in the mid-twentieth century (Gerdeaux, Anneville, & Hefti, 2006). Nutrient abatement measures were, however, undertaken earlier in Lake Annecy than in lakes Bourget and Geneva. As a result, Lake Annecy is now oligotrophic, that is, phosphate concentration in the water is <4 µg/L, while the other two lakes are mesotrophic (phosphate concentration 15–20 µg/L), data from OLA, Observatory of LAkes (http://www6.inra.fr/soere-ola, recorded in early fall 2015, ©SOERE OLA-IS, AnaEE-France, INRA Thonon-les-Bains, CISALB, CIPEL, SILA, developed by Eco-Informatics ORE INRA Team). In these three phosphorus-limited ecosystems, the phosphate concentration in the water strongly determines plankton quantity and quality (Müller-Navarra & Lampert, 1996) and YOY perch are zooplanktivorous (Masson, Angeli, Guillard, & Pinel-Alloul, 2001). The dietary hypothesis posits that the lower availability and nutritional quality of the food resource for YOY perch in Lake Annecy are responsible for the high mortality of YOY perch during fall and first winter, as previously hypothesized for other nutrient limited lakes (Dettmers, Raffenberg, & Weis, 2003).

An alternative hypothesis is that the lower perch recruitment in Lake Annecy could be related to the occurrence of the parasitic tapeworm *T. nodulosus*. *Triaenophorus nodulosus* is currently recorded in almost all waters of Europe where its final host, northern pike (*Esox lucius*), normally occurs, but its prevalence rate in YOY perch can be highly variable (Dettmers et al., 2003). In Lake Annecy, more than 80% of YOY perch are parasitized by the end of the summer, while the parasite prevalence is much lower in the other two lakes (Jacquet et al., 2015; Perga et al.,
2016). *Triaenophorus nodulosus* has a three-host life cycle where it uses copepods as the first intermediate host, a broad range of fish species (>70 spp.) as the second intermediate host (e.g., European perch, see Kuperman, 1973; Kuchta et al., 2007), and northern pike as the final host to complete its life cycle. In European perch, plerocercoids, that is, cysts in mature form of infectious stages, are concentrated in the liver and are occasionally seen in other organs such as the spleen, gonad, kidney, and musculature (Brinker & Hamers, 2007; Kuperman, 1973). The histological consequences of parasite activity in perch include lysis of the membrane of host cells and pathological symptoms such as inflammation, atrophy, necrosis, and oedema (Kuperman, 1973). Agreement on whether these symptoms have a cascading impact on the survival rate is lacking (Dieterich & Eckmann, 2000; Hoffmann, Meder, Klein, Osterkornj, & Negele, 1986). The parasitic hypothesis posits that the high prevalence of *T. nodulosus* in YOY perch in Lake Annecy affects their physiological traits and limits their physical condition at the end of their first summer and thus compromises YOY perch survival during their first winter, as compared to the other two lakes. The third and final hypothesis is that both nutritional and parasitic constraints interact to limit YOY perch survival in Lake Annecy.

2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 | Study sites, sampling, and processing

Lakes Geneva, Bourget, and Annecy are large, deep, clearwater,
and monomictic lakes lying to the north-western border of the

French Alps (Figure 1, see Table 1 for characteristics). Fish com-
munities are similar and typical of subalpine lakes with native or
early introduced populations of whitefish (*Coregonus lavaretus*),
European perch (*Perca fluviatilis*), roach (*Rutilus rutilus*), and pike
(*Esox lucius*). The three lakes are monitored fortnightly to monthly
by OLA, the Observatory of LAkes (www6.inra.fr/soere-ola, see
Table 1).

Fish were caught in early fall 2015 during fish monitoring surveys using gillnets in multiple sites all around lakes Annecy and Bourget, following the European standard gillnet protocol (CEN 2005). Lake Geneva was sampled at only one site. Fish from all sites were identified to species, weighed to the nearest gram (wet weight), and measured (total length) to the nearest millimetre immediately after sampling. Individuals were stored at -20°C until further analysis. Lakes Annecy and Bourget captures were randomly subsampled, but all Lake Geneva catches were used.

After thawing, fish livers were excised and dissected, and the
number and the wet weight of cysts were recorded. Guts were re-
moved, and fish were decapitated and scaled. Fish bodies were then
freeze-dried and ground with a mortar and pestle for fatty acid and
stable isotope analyses. A total of 424, 210, and 109 individual YOY
perch were analysed for lakes Annecy, Bourget, and Geneva, re-
spectively. Thereafter, fish were classified within the three different
infection levels as defined by Brinker and Hamers (2007; ca. none,
moderate ≤3 cysts, high >3 cysts in the liver), and 10-50 individuals
were randomly selected within each infection levels for stable iso-
tope and 4-19 individuals for fatty acids analyses (Supplementary
Information Table S1).

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** Location of study lakes</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**TABLE 1** Characteristics of the three peri-alpine lakes studied (data for year 2015 from http://si-ola.inra.fr ©SOERE OLA-IS, AnaEE-France, INRA Thonon-les-Bains, CISALB, CIPEL, SILA, developed by Eco-Informatics ORE INRA Team)</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>Trophic status</th><th>Altitude (m)</th><th>Total area (km²)</th><th>Maximum depth (m)</th><th>Mean depth (m)</th><th>Phosphorus concentration (µg/L)</th><th>Zooplankton density (ind/m³)</th><th>Zooplankton groups</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lake Annecy</td><td>Oligotrophic</td><td>447</td><td>26</td><td>65</td><td>42</td><td>4</td><td>6,500</td><td>Cyclopoids: 50%-70%<br>Cladocerans: 25%<br>Calanoids: 15%</td></tr><tr><td>Lake Bourget</td><td>Mesotrophic</td><td>232</td><td>44</td><td>146</td><td>85</td><td>17</td><td>5,700</td><td>Calanoids: 40%-50%<br>Cladocerans: 20%-30%<br>Cyclopoids: 20%-30%</td></tr><tr><td>Lake Geneva</td><td>Mesotrophic</td><td>372</td><td>580</td><td>310</td><td>152</td><td>19</td><td>8,000</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

## 2.2 | Parasitic burden

Infection level was categorized as defined above. The parasitic index (PI, Masson, Vanacker, Fox, & Beisel, 2015) was computed as $PI = (W_p/W_f) \times 100$, $W_p$ being the total weight of cysts and $W_f$ the total weight of the individual fish, in g. A potential physiological effect of the parasite on YOY perch was also assessed through the hepatosomatic index (HSI, Masson et al., 2015) with $= ((W_f-W_p)/W_f) \times 100$, $W_f$ being the total weight of liver in g, including cysts in case of infection.

## 2.3 | Stable isotope analyses

Homogenized freeze-dried fish tissue was weighed (1 mg) into tin capsules. $\delta^{13}$C and $\delta^{15}$N were measured at the SINLAB (New Brunswick, Canada) on a Finnigan Delta Plus mass spectrometer interfaced via a Conflo II to a NC2500 Elemental. Internal laboratory standards (acetanilide, nicotinamide, and bovine liver) were run every 10 samples. The precision values of the carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses were <0.2‰ (1 SD). Overall, the molar C/N ratio, which had an average value of 3.4, was not significantly correlated with the fish $\delta^{13}$C values. These observations are consistent with those by Skinner, Martin, and Moore (2016), which rejected any significant bias in the lipid content of fish muscle $\delta^{13}$C below a 5% lipid content (or molar C/N < 3.5).

Variability in YOY perch $\delta^{13}$C, $\delta^{15}$N, and molar C/N was initially analysed within a single lake population. With regard to YOY perch fast growth during their first summer (Masson et al., 2001), the stable isotope composition of their body tissue was considered as an integration of that of their food sources over the last life stage (Perga & Gerdeaux, 2005). Individual YOY perch $\delta^{13}$C was used as an indicator of the intrapopulation variability in trophic habitats (littoral vs. pelagic), while $\delta^{15}$N reflected the intrapopulation variability in trophic position (zooplanktivorous vs. predatory). Due to a lack of baseline material, we did not compute any quantitative estimates for the proportion of each carbon source nor any trophic levels for individuals. Molar C/N can be considered as a surrogate for fat content in fish fillets and therefore included as an indicator for fish physiological conditions, rather than a trophic marker per se.

## 2.4 | Fatty acid analyses

Briefly, the lipids were extracted using a 4:2:1 chloroform/methanol/water mixture (Parrish, 1999). Fatty acids (FA), analysed as methyl esters (FAME), were prepared by saponification of the lipid extract followed by esterification. The FAME extract was subsequently analysed by gas chromatography (GC-2010, Shimadzu), on a Supelcowax 10 capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm inner diameter, and 0.25 µm film thickness), and measured by a flame ionization detector (FID). FAME were identified by comparison of their retention times with known standards (37-component FAME mix, Supelco 47885-U) and quantified with reference calibration curves. FA compositions are expressed in percentage of total identified FA for all sample types.
Fatty acid analyses were used as indicators of both perch trophic
habitats (through the use of fatty acid trophic markers—FATM) and
perch physiological conditions (through their contents in essential
fatty acids, see next section). The FATM concept is based on the ob-
servation that organic sources of different origins and natures lay
down certain fatty acid patterns that may be transferred conserv-
vatively to, and hence can be recognized, in consumers (Dalsgaard,
John, Kattner, Müller-Navarra, & Hagen, 2003). Among prey of YOY
perch, cladocerans and cyclopoid copepods are rich in EPA (eicos-
apentaenoic acid; 20:5n-3) while highly deprived in DHA (docosa-
hexaenoic acid; 22:6n-3) as compared to calanoid copepod species
(Kainz et al., 2005; Syväranta & Rautio, 2010). Therefore, the EPA/
DHA ratio in YOY perch is indicative of the (lower) share of calanoids
in the diet. The ratio of bacterial FA (15:0 + 15:1 + 17:0 + 17:1) rela-
tive to the ubiquist eukaryotic 16:0 is indicative of the involvement in
the detrital microbial loop within the food chain, while the terrestrial
index (C24:0/C16:0) is indicative of the relative role of terrestrial car-
bon in supporting the secondary production (Dalsgaard et al., 2003).
Hence, FA composition of YOY perch provides information on their
nutritional sources and how they vary between individuals and lakes.

**2.5 | Quantification of perch physiological condition**

YOY perch condition by the end of summer was first evaluated
through the allometric relationship between fish weight (in g) (W_f)
and length (in mm) (L_f): W_f = a × L_f^b (Le Cren, 1951), where b is the
coefficient balancing the dimensions of the equation. Individuals
with negative allometry (b < 3) grew faster in length than in weight,
suggesting they are in lower physiological conditions than those
with isometry (b = 3) or positive allometry (b > 3) (Lleonart, Salat, &
Torres, 2000). YOY growth in the three lakes was compared to the
general equation proposed by Giannetto, Carosi, Franchi, La Porta,
and Lorenzoni's (2012) model based on 64,913 specimens from 762
populations of Eurasian perch (W_f = 0.7·10⁻⁵ × L_f³.¹⁰¹).

Furthermore, the availability of highly unsaturated fatty acids,
and especially EPA and DHA, is of prime importance for larval and
juvenile development and fitness (Sargent, Bell, McEvoy, Tocher, &
Estevez, 1999), larval condition and juvenile behaviour, growth rate,
ability to feed, and development of the brain and nervous systems
(Ishizaki et al., 2001). DHA and other long-chain fatty acids may also
be determinant for antipredator performance of fish larvae, with
effects on escape responses mediated by sensory systems (Fuiman
& Ojanguren, 2011). Therefore, the retention and accumulation of
these essential FA, which cannot be synthesized by fish, in the early
larval stages are key factors in fish recruitment fluctuations (Bell &
Sargent, 1996). Percentage contents in these FA were then consid-
ered as secondary indicators of fish physiological conditions, such as
C/N molar ratios.

**2.6 | Data analyses**

Parasite occurrence and prevalence between lakes were compared
by using Chi-squared tests. Differences in average length and weight
of fish, parasitic and hepatosomatic indexes (PI, HSI), and biomarker
levels were tested, between lakes and infection levels, by using
ANOVA. Relationships between fish condition and parasitism were
analysed both between lakes and within lakes. ANCOVA was first
used to detect differences in allometric coefficients between lakes
and to test whether they diverged from theoretical values for iso-
metric growth. In the regression models, log(Weight) was the de-
pendent variable and log(Length) the covariate, lake identity being
the categorical variable. The slope of the relationships provides an
estimate (expected mean ± 95% confidence interval) of the allo-
metric coefficient which can be readily compared to the theoretical
value for isometric growth (within or out of the 95% CI) and between
each lake (whether confidence intervals intercross or not). Because
allometric coefficients were found to vary between lakes, infection
level was thereafter introduced as a nested factor within lakes, to

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 2** Differences in fish growth parameters. (a) Boxplots (median, quartiles and outliers) presenting the length distribution of YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) between lakes (dark grey for L. Annecy, light grey for L. Bourget, and white for L. Geneva) and infection levels of *Triaenophorus nodulosus* (from none to high). (b) Allometric length-weight relationships for YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) from lakes Annecy, Bourget, and Geneva, as compared to the equation of Giannetto et al.'s (2012) model (W<sub>f</sub> = 0.7·10<sup>-5</sup>×L<sub>f</sub><sup>3.101</sup>)
<table><caption>**TABLE 2** Allometric relationships of YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) body condition (length/weight) by linear models tested with ANCOVAs between lakes and within lakes between infection levels (from none to high)</caption><thead><tr><th>ANCOVA (model)</th><th>F</th><th>p</th><th>Effect</th><th>Estimated value of the<br>allometric coefficient (95% CI)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Lake effect</td><td>29.6</td><td>4·10<sup>-13</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>2.44 (2.26–2.61)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Bourget</td><td>3.04 (2.88–3.19)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Geneva</td><td>2.91 (2.69–3.12)</td></tr><tr><td>Infection level within lakes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Annecy</td><td>1.24</td><td>0.30</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>0.98</td><td>0.38</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>0.39</td><td>0.68</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Response (model)</th><th colspan="2">Lake effect</th><th colspan="3">Infection levels within lakes</th></tr><tr><th>F</th><th>p</th><th>Lake</th><th>F</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">HSI</td><td rowspan="3">17.40</td><td rowspan="3">3·10<sup>-7</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>63.9</td><td>1·10<sup>-14*</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>9.0</td><td>0.003*</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>11.4</td><td>0.001*</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">δ<sup>13</sup>C</td><td rowspan="3">462.7</td><td rowspan="3">&lt;2·10<sup>-16</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.53</td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>1.21</td><td>0.31</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>3.66</td><td>0.04*</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">δ<sup>15</sup>N</td><td rowspan="3">1,070</td><td rowspan="3">&lt;2·10<sup>-16</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>0.34</td><td>0.71</td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>1.94</td><td>0.16</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.79</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">C:N</td><td rowspan="3">19.84</td><td rowspan="3">6·10<sup>-8</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>3.87</td><td>0.03*</td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>2.13</td><td>0.14</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>0.32</td><td>0.73</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">24:0/16:0 terrestrial</td><td rowspan="3">4.68</td><td rowspan="3">0.01</td><td>Annecy</td><td>2.17</td><td>0.13</td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>4.80</td><td>0.02*</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>2.98</td><td>0.07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">EPA/DHA</td><td rowspan="3">12.63</td><td rowspan="3">1·10<sup>-5</sup></td><td>Annecy</td><td>1.18</td><td>0.32</td></tr><tr><td>Bourget</td><td>4.36</td><td>0.02*</td></tr><tr><td>Geneva</td><td>3.37</td><td>0.05*</td></tr></tbody></table>

<caption>**TABLE 3** Results from ANOVAs testing whether indicators of YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) (hepatosomatic index, stable isotopes, and trophic biomarkers as terrestrial index and ratio EPA/DHA) varied between lakes and within lakes for each category of infection level (from none to high)</caption>

potentially detect lake-specific parasitic effect. Differences in FA composition (arcsin square root transformed to achieve normality) and biomarkers levels between lakes and infections were explored by using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA). All tests were performed with R 3.1.1 software (R Core Development Team, 2008) with the alpha risk set at 5%.

# 3 | RESULTS

## 3.1 | Parasite load of *T. nodulosus* on the population of YOY perch in the three studied lakes

Parasite prevalence was the highest in Lake Annecy, with 83% of YOY perch containing liver cysts of *T. nodulosus*. Prevalence was the lowest in Lake Bourget (61%) and intermediate in Lake Geneva

(77%). The distribution ($\chi^2 = 62, p < 0.001$) and average number of liver cysts per individuals (ANOVA, $F = 118, p < 0.001$) differed significantly between lakes. In Lake Annecy, individuals carried on average 1.79 cysts as compared to 1.13 and 1.34 for lakes Bourget and Geneva, respectively. PI was 0.62 for YOY perch in Lake Annecy, as compared to 0.18 and 0.28 for lakes Bourget and Geneva, respectively.

## 3.2 | Relationships between life history traits and parasitism between- and within-lake populations

Average YOY perch length (Figure 2a) and weight were significantly different among lakes (one-way ANOVA, $F = 2440, p < 0.001$, and $F = 1550, p < 0.001$, for length and weight, respectively). YOY perch from Lake Annecy were approximately 30% shorter and 55% lighter

<footnote>*Significant differences at the minimum 5% alpha risk level.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 3** Average (±SE) values of the hepatosomatic index (HSI) for YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) between lakes and infection levels of *Triaenophorus nodulosus*. (*) indicates significant differences at the 5% alpha risk between Lake Annecy and the two other lakes Geneva and Bourget)</figcaption></figure>

than those from Lake Bourget at similar infection levels (Figure 2). Neither YOY length nor weight varied significantly according to infection levels within lakes (two-way ANOVA for length, infection levels, *F* = 0.025, *p* = 0.98).

Allometric relationships also differed significantly between lakes (Table 2, Figure 2b). Estimated values for the allometric coefficient pointed to an isometric growth in both lakes Geneva and Bourget, while in Lake Annecy YOY perch clearly grow with a negative allometry (Figure 2b). Within each lake though, *b* values did not vary according to the infection level, that is, as for length and weight. Therefore, YOY growth was not impacted by *T. nodulosus* infection level.

The HSI varied significantly between lakes (Table 3) and showed higher values for YOY perch in lakes Bourget and Geneva as compared to Lake Annecy. Within each single lake, HSI decreased significantly with the infection level (Table 3, Figure 3). The strongest effect was observed for the YOY population of Lake Annecy, for which HSI was 35% lower for the highest infection level than for no infection.

## 3.3 | Isotopic, elementary, and fatty acid biomarkers

Fish $\delta^{13}$C, $\delta^{15}$N, and C/N varied significantly between lakes (Table 3, Figure 4), suggestive of contrasting trophic niches. $\delta^{13}$C and $\delta^{15}$N values were the lowest in Lake Annecy, intermediate in Lake Bourget, and the highest in Lake Geneva. Perch $\delta^{13}$C and $\delta^{15}$N were not correlated with fish length and did not vary significantly among infection levels within lakes. Fatty acid composition of YOY varied significantly among lakes (LDA, Wilks' $\lambda$da = 0.05, $F$(2,48) = 110, *p* < $10^{-15}$) but not infection levels (LDA, Wilks' $\lambda$da = 0.59, $F$(2,48) = 1.03, *p* = 0.44). The differences between lakes were the most striking for

percentages of some mono- and polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) (Supplementary Information Table S2), EPA/DHA, and the terrestrial index (Table 3). C/N ratios (Figure 4c) and relative abundances in PUFA (Supplementary Information Table S2) were the lowest in Lake Annecy, along with the highest terrestrial index 24:0/16:0 (Figure 5a) and EPA/DHA (Figure 5b). At the other end of the scale, YOY perch of Lake Geneva exhibited high C/N ratios (Figure 4c), high proportions of PUFA (Supplementary Information Table S2), and comparatively the lowest values for the EPA/DHA and terrestrial index (Figure 5). In Lake Annecy, the composition in lipid biomarkers was not dependent on the infection levels but C/N tended to be lower for the moderate and high infection levels. In lakes Bourget and Geneva, the physiological EPA/DHA ratio (Table 3, Figure 5) displayed values that were significantly lower for the higher infection levels.

# 4 | DISCUSSION

The paucity of *in situ* examples of the dynamic consequences of parasites on their host reflects the difficulties inherent in teasing out the role of parasites in complex ecological systems with many potentially confounding factors (Albon et al., 2002; Britton, Pegg & Williams, 2011; Iwanowicz, 2011). Indeed, a small but growing field of evidence exists to support the theory that macro-parasites play a role in regulating host populations (Albon et al., 2002).

If work on the ecological impacts of parasites in the field is necessarily correlative (Poulin, 2007), identification of the mechanisms that lead to differences detected between infected and noninfected hosts is difficult due to preexisting differences that may have conditioned the success of infection (Bize, Jeanneret, Klopfenstein, & Roulin, 2007), or the physiological consequences of the infection (Anderson & May, 1978). The energetic costs of parasitism can be direct, by diverting host energy allocation, or indirect, due to behavioural changes (Loot, Brosse, Lek, & Guégan, 2001) or modifications in host metabolic rates and energy needs (Booth, Clayton, & Block, 1993). The theory of the parasitic cost itself can be contested even at the individual scale because, counter-intuitively, growth of infected hosts can exceed that of noninfected individuals (Arnott, Barber, & Huntingford, 2000). As the impacts of parasitism may depend, even at the individual scale, on the hosts nutritional state (Washburn et al., 1991), evaluation of the actual role of parasitism to control the survival of individuals and then the dynamics of a host population remains very difficult.

## 4.1 | A primary nutritional control on YOY perch growth and fat storage

The physiological state and life history traits of the YOY perch populations clearly varied between the three study lakes, while differences of these same parameters between infection levels within lakes were less significant. Therefore, the major controlling factor of
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 4** Boxplots (median, quartiles, and outliers) presenting (a) δ¹³C, (b) δ¹⁵N, and (c) molar C/N of YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) for lakes (dark grey for L. Annecy, light grey for L. Bourget, and white for L. Geneva) and infection levels of *Triaenophorus nodulosus* (from none to high)

perch growth and physiology in our case study was acting at the lake scale (rather than within a given lake).

At the end of their first summer, YOY perch in Lake Annecy were smaller and lighter than in the other two lakes, and they also grew anisometrically (i.e., they had a mass deficit before their first winter). The liver is the dominant organ for lipid deposition in juvenile fish (Sargent, McEvoy, et al., 1999); hence, HSI is directly depending on the lipid content of the fish diet. In Lake Annecy, lower C/N ratios of the total body mass for YOY perch and lower values of HSI suggest that lower growth was associated with a deficit in fat storage at the end of the summer. Winter mortality of age 0+ perch is size selective, such that larger individuals (a) are expected to more easily withstand winter food limitation and fat depletion (Post & Evans, 1989), (b) are more likely to switch to piscivory and cannibalism before winter, a more energetically rewarding food source (Keast & Eadie, 1985), and (c) should escape predation and cannibalism (Persson, Bystrom, Wahlstrom, & Westman, 2004). However, Huss, Byström, Strand, Eriksson, and Persson (2008) demonstrated that winter survival for age 0+ yellow perch (*Perca flavescens*) in Canadian lakes was functionally more dependent on fat storage than on individual size. Abiotic factors such as water temperature and/or wind can influence perch growth during their first year (Mélard, Kestemont, & Grignard, 1996), but Lake Annecy, being the warmest of these three lakes and also the most sheltered from winds (Perga et al., 2015), would present the best abiotic conditions for fish growth. Therefore, water temperature and wind are unlikely factors limiting perch growth in Lake Annecy, and the amount of fat storage is likely driven more by the feeding history of juveniles prior to the winter (Heermann, Eriksson, Magnhagen, & Borcherding, 2009).

YOY perch feed on zooplankton and preferentially on copepods (calanoids and cyclopoids) (Guma'a, 1978; Masson et al., 2001). Calanoids are more nutritionally rewarding than cyclopoids and cladocerans (Smyntek, Teece, Schulz, & Storch, 2008), being at the same time fattier, but also richer in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 5** Boxplots (median, quartiles, and outliers) presenting (a) 24:0/16:0 ratio, that is, terrestrial index and (b) EPA/DHA ratio of YOY perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) for lakes (dark grey for L. Annecy, light grey for L. Bourget, and white for L. Geneva) and infection levels of *Triaenophorus nodulosus* (from none to high)
long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid that is essential for juvenile fish growth and development (Sargent, Bell, et al., 1999; Sargent, McEvoy, et al., 1999). Total annual zooplankton density in Lake Annecy is 6,500 ind./m³ and intermediate between that of Lake Bourget (5,700 ind./m³ in 2015) and Lake Geneva (approximately 8,000 ind./m³, in 2015, Table 1), in spite of its lower phosphate concentrations. Therefore, zooplankton quality (Arts & Sprules, 1989) instead of quantity might be the bottleneck for perch growth in Lake Annecy. In lakes Geneva and Bourget, *Eudiaptomus gracilis*, the only calanoid species, makes up 40%-50% of microcrustacean community, while cladocerans (*Daphnia longispina* sp. and *Bosmina* sp.) and cyclopoid copepods (*Cyclops* sp.) contribute to 20%-30% each. In contrast, in Lake Annecy, the microcrustacean community is largely dominated by *Cyclops* sp. (50%-70% of the community), while cladocerans represent 25%. Calanoids, represented by the only species *Mixodiaptomus laciniatus*, rarely makes up >15% of the microcrustacean community (data from http://si-ola.inra.fr). Dominance by omnivorous and opportunistic cyclopoid copepods is usually expected in oligotrophic systems for which pico- and nano-plankters make up an important share of primary production (Sommer, Stibor, Katechakis, Sommer, & Hansen, 2002), or for which the microbial loop, that is, the trophic pathway where dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is returned to higher trophic levels via its incorporation into bacterial biomass, plays an important role in remobilizing detritus in these systems with low autotrophic productions (Wickham, 1995). Both conditions are met in Lake Annecy. Pico- and nano-plankters represent typically 50% of the phytoplankton biomass (Perga et al., 2016), while bacterial grazing by mixotrophic flagellates makes the brown chain, that is, food web based on detritus, highly efficient (Domaizon, Viboud, & Fontvieille, 2003). Cyclopoid copepods are the most efficient zooplankters to exploit both these pico-autotrophic and heterotrophic food sources in a context of nutrient limitation. Evidence of terrestrial supplementation of the secondary production in the oligotrophic Lake Annecy has also been provided in a previous study, in which the high content in the terrestrial indicator 24:0/16:0 for *Cyclops* and juvenile whitefish in Lake Annecy confirmed the role of *Cyclops* as the crucial trophic node connecting the brown chain and fish (Perga, Bec, & Anneville, 2009). The contribution of terrestrial organic matter also appeared for YOY perch in Lake Annecy and is consistent with the control of nutrient limitation on zooplankton structure, which is further transmitted up to fish growth. In contrast, the calanoid *Eudiaptomus gracilis* is highly ubiquitous and its presence cannot be straightforwardly related to lake trophic status (Riccardi & Rossetti, 2007). Instead, *E. gracilis* is thought to be favoured in aquatic systems in which blooms of large or toxic algae occur (Sommer et al., 2002), such as in lakes Geneva and Bourget where blooms can occur episodically (Jacquet et al., 2005; Tapolczai et al., 2015).

If the underlying processes by which nutrients control the microcrustacean community structure in these lakes cannot yet be fully explained, they undeniably have consequences in terms of the quality of the food available for YOY perch. In fact, YOY perch were not only fattier in the two lakes in which calanoids dominated

zooplankton, but they also exhibited higher levels of DHA and lower EPA/DHA ratios. The results confirm that perch growth and probability to survive their first winter in Lake Annecy were probably limited by food quality in this lake, as compared to lakes Geneva and Bourget.

## 4.2 | Parasitism impact on perch growth and fat storage

The fish tapeworm *T. nodulosus* is the most pathological species of the *Triaenophorus* genus (Brinker & Hamers, 2007). Controversial data exist on the effects of *T. nodulosus* plerocercoids on European perch growth and condition, but the increase in prevalence and abundance has been considered as one reason for diminishing perch stocks in Lake Constance (Dieterich & Eckmann, 2000). Indeed, infected individuals in Lake Constance had a lower growth than uninfected individuals, but only for individuals older than 2 years. According to Brinker and Hamers (2007) and Dezfuli, Giari, Lorenzoni, and Noga (2014), pathological effects occur when infection level exceeds three cysts/individual. In Lake Annecy, highly infected YOY perch represent 25% of the population versus 11%-12% for the other two lakes.

For the present study, despite the high infection levels, we did not find evidence for any significant difference in fish growth within lakes that could be attributed to the parasite effect. Even individuals with a high parasitic load were not statistically smaller or lighter than those that were not infected, in any of the lakes. HSI was the only parameter which showed a consistent effect of infection levels along with a lake effect, meaning that part of the fat deficit observed by the end of summer for Lake Annecy could be partly due to a deleterious effect of *T. nodulosus* on liver size and function. However, liver tissue lost during excising of the parasite can affect results; the more parasites removed the greater the possibility removing liver tissue too. Yet, *Raphidascaris acus*, which, like *T. nodulosus*, encysts in the liver of yellow perch (*Perca flavescens*), significantly diminishes fat storage of the host (Johnson & Dick, 2001). However, in Lake Annecy, final effect on body fat (C/N) was only significant for the highly infested YOY perch, while moderate to highly infested perch in lakes Geneva and Bourget exhibited higher DHA levels (and subsequent lower EPA/DHA ratios), suggesting that for the other two lakes, the availability of higher-quality food might compensate for the parasitic effect on the quantity and quality of lipid reserves. Therefore, *T. nodulosus* effect on fat storage, which, as discussed above, plays a crucial role in winter survival, could be a secondary factor contributing to the low perch recruitment in lakes for which food quality is already limiting.

## 4.3 | Nutritional and parasitic control on perch feeding behaviour

YOY perch exhibit an ontogenic change in feeding behaviour, shifting from planktivory to benthivory and/or piscivory. The timing and succession of these shifts depend on the lake feeding resource levels
(Hjelm, Svanback, Bystrom, Persson, & Wahlstrom, 2001). Beyond direct impacts, consequences of parasitism on host, particularly with trophically transmitted parasites, could also trigger changes in feeding behaviour and habitat use of the intermediate hosts to increase susceptibility to predation by final hosts (Loot et al., 2001). For the YOY perch—*T. nodulosus* model, the most advantageous behavioural modification for the parasite would be an earlier shift of YOY perch to littoral habitats to increase the probability of encountering its final host, that is, pike. The ultimate effects of such indirect consequences of the parasite on host growth could mimic those of their direct effects as a shift in habitat utilization may lead to a change in food availability and quality. Changes in perch feeding behaviour, whether due to nutritional or to parasitic control, should in theory be detected from analysis of the stable isotope composition of body tissue.

There were significant differences in YOY perch δ¹³C between lakes, but these are actually due to already well-documented isotopic baseline effects as planktonic δ¹³C values naturally increase with lake size and trophic status for these peri-alpine lakes (Perga & Gerdeaux, 2004). YOY perch δ¹³C varied only marginally within lakes with parasitic infection level. Because fish δ¹³C can vary according to the lipid content of fish body (Skinner et al., 2016), variation in δ¹³C could also be the consequence of highly infested fish also being slightly less fat. Therefore, we considered that these small δ¹³C differences are not robust enough to confidently pinpoint a parasite effect on perch shift to littoral habitat, tied to increasing δ¹³C.

The annual mean and range of seasonal variability in δ¹⁵N for zooplankton are comparable between lakes Annecy and Geneva, while we have no data for Lake Bourget. YOY perch δ¹⁵N in lakes Geneva and Bourget were about 4‰ higher than in Lake Annecy at the end of summer, that is, quite consistent for what is expected for a shift from zooplanktivory to piscivory (Persson & Greenberg, 1990). Within lakes, individual δ¹⁵N was not significantly correlated with fish size, as a result of low intralake variability in both parameters. Because the timing of perch ontogenic shift depends more on morphometric changes and lake resource levels than on absolute size alone, it is likely that the high food quality in lakes Bourget and Geneva allows for the whole perch cohort to shift to piscivory before the end of summer. In contrast, in Lake Annecy, the perch cohort did not achieve the growth threshold for piscivory by the end of summer, yet another factor making them more vulnerable to winter kills (Hjelm, Persson, & Christensen, 2000). δ¹⁵N of perch did not vary significantly between infection levels within lakes, excluding a potential parasitic driven change in the timing of the ontogenic shift.

## 4.4 | Co-occurrence of low food quality and parasite loads

Overall, we found a low impact of parasitism on the physiological condition and trophic level of YOY perch at the end of their first summer in lakes Geneva, Annecy, and Bourget and speculated by extension, on their winter survival and recruitment. We suspect, however, that parasitism by *T. nodulosus* had a significant effect on liver lipogenic

activity at higher levels of infections that contributes to the deficit in fat storage for YOY perch that were already in a nutritionally limited environment. Hence, we consider parasitic control of the host population is of secondary importance, conditioned by the primary nutritional constraint. Therefore, the high mortality of perch in late fall and winter in Lake Annecy is not caused by the higher parasite prevalence, but instead, both phenomena are most likely driven by the stoichiometric constrain in this lake. The very low phosphorous concentrations favour zooplankters with low P requirements, that is, cyclopoids, over the P-demanding cladocerans and calanoids (Andersen & Hessen, 1991). Cyclopoid copepods become dominant in peri-alpine lakes with low nutrient concentrations, as Lake Annecy, and given the role of these cyclopoid copepods as intermediate hosts in the life cycle of *T. nodulosus*, the probability for YOY perch to encounter an infested prey is higher (Brinker & Hamers, 2007). Our results suggest an indirect link between environmental factors (lake phosphorus concentrations) and the prevalence of an endoparasite, through the modulation of the parasite-host encounter rates in the system *Perca fluviatilis*-*Triaenophorus nodulosus*, shedding light on the need to consider abiotic factors but also the pathways by which they can act on the host-parasite relationships in nature.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Jason Stockwell kindly edited the manuscript.

## CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

## AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTION

MEP and JG conceived the study; AF analysed the samples and performed the statistical analyses; AF, MEP, and JG drafted the manuscript.

## DATA ACCESSIBILITY

Fish metrics, parasitic data, stable isotope, and fatty acid contents are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2kf5b8k.

Lake Data: publicly available on http://si-ola.inra.fr.

## ORCID

Marie-Elodie Perga ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-0769

Jean Guillard ID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-1167

## REFERENCES

Aalto, S. L., Decaestecker, E., & Pulkkinen, K. (2015). A three-way perspective of stoichiometric changes on host; parasite interactions.
*Trends in Parasitology*, 31, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.04.005

Albon, S. D., Stien, A., Irvine, R. J., Langvatn, R., Ropstad, E., & Halvorsen, O. (2002). The role of parasites in the dynamics of a reindeer population. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, 269, 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2064

Andersen, T., & Hessen, D. O. (1991). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of freshwater zooplankton. *Limnology and Oceanography*, 36, 807-814. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0807

Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1978). Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory processes. *Journal of Animal Ecology*, 47, 219-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/3933

Arnott, S. A., Barber, I., & Huntingford, F. A. (2000). Parasite-associated growth enhancement in a fish-cestode system. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, 267, 657-663. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1052

Arts, M. T., & Sprules, W. G. (1989). Use of enclosures to detect the contribution of particular zooplankton to growth of young-of-the-year yellow perch (*Perca flavescens* Mitchell). *Oecologia*, 81(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377004

Bell, M. V., & Sargent, J. R. (1996). Lipid nutrition and fish recruitment. *Marine Ecology Progress Series*, 134, 315-316. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps134315

Bize, P., Jeanneret, C., Klopfenstein, A., & Roulin, A. (2007). What makes a host profitable? Parasites balance host nutritive resources against immunity. *The American Naturalist*, 171, 107-118.

Booth, D. T., Clayton, D. H., & Block, B. A. (1993). Experimental demonstration of the energetic cost of parasitism im free-ranging hosts. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, 253(1337), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0091

Brinker, A., & Hamers, R. (2007). Evidence for negative impact of plerocercoid infection of Triaenophorus nodulosus on *Perca fluviatilis* L. stock in Upper Lake Constance, a water body undergoing rapid re-oligotrophication. *Journal of Fish Biology*, 71, 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01475.x

Britton, J. R., Pegg, J., & Williams, C. F. (2011). Pathological and ecological host consequences of infection by an introduced fish parasite. *PLoS One*, 6(10), e26365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026365

CEN (2005). EN 14757, Water quality - Sampling of fish with multi-mesh gillnets. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/9929986/cen-en-14757

Combes, C. (2001). *Parasitism: The ecology and evolution of intimate interactions*. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cornet, S., Bichet, C., Larcombe, S., Faivre, B., & Sorci, G. (2014). Impact of host nutritional status on infection dynamics and parasite virulence in a bird-malaria system. *Journal of Animal Ecology*, 83, 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12113

Dalsgaard, J., John, M. S., Kattner, G., Müller-Navarra, D., & Hagen, W. (2003). Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment. *Advances in Marine Biology*, 46, 225-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(03)46005-7

Decaestecker, E., Declerck, S., De Meester, L., & Ebert, D. (2005). Ecological implications of parasites in natural Daphnia populations. *Oecologia*, 144, 382-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0083-7

Dettmers, J. M., Raffenberg, M. J., & Weis, A. K. (2003). Exploring zooplankton changes in Southern Lake Michigan: Implications for yellow perch recruitment. *Journal of Great Lakes Research*, 29, 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70439-0

Dezfuli, B., Giari, L., Lorenzoni, M., & Noga, E. J. (2014). Perch liver reaction to Triaenophorus nodulosus plerocercoids with an emphasis on piscidins 3, 4 and proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression. *Veterinary Parasitology*, 200, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.023

Dieterich, A., & Eckmann, R. (2000). The infection of Eurasian perch *Perca fluviatilis* L. with Triaenophorus nodulosus (Pallas) plerocercoids in Lake Constance (Germany). *Bulletin-European Association of Fish Pathologists*, 20, 34-39.

Domaizon, I., Viboud, S., & Fontvieille, D. (2003). Taxon-specific and seasonal variations in flagellates grazing on heterotrophic bacteria in the oligotrophic Lake Annecy-importance of mixotrophy. *FEMS Microbiology Ecology*, 46, 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00248-4

Duffy, M. A., Brassil, C. E., Hall, S. R., Tessier, A. J., Cáceres, C. E., & Conner, J. K. (2008). Parasite-mediated disruptive selection in a natural Daphnia population. *BMC Evolutionary Biology*, 8, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-80

Fuiman, L. A., & Ojanguren, A. F. (2011). Fatty acid content of eggs determines antipredator performance of fish larvae. *Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology*, 407(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.004

Gerdeaux, D., Anneville, O., & Hefti, D. (2006). Fishery changes during re-oligotrophication in 11 peri-alpine Swiss and French lakes over the past 30 years. *Acta Oecologica*, 30(2), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2006.02.007

Giannetto, D., Carosi, A., Franchi, E., La Porta, G., & Lorenzoni, M. (2012). Proposed standard weight (Ws) equation for European perch (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758). *Journal of Applied Ichthyology*, 28, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01880.x

Guillard, J., Perga, M. E., Colon, M., & Angeli, N. (2006). Hydroacoustic assessment of young-of-year perch, *Perca fluviatilis*, population dynamics in an oligotrophic lake (Lake Annecy, France). *Fisheries Management and Ecology*, 13, 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00508.x

Guma'a, S. A. (1978). The food and feeding habits of young perch, *Perca fluviatilis*, in Windermere. *Freshwater Biology*, 8, 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1978.tb01439.x

Heermann, L., Eriksson, L. O., Magnhagen, C., & Borcherding, J. (2009). Size-dependent energy storage and winter mortality of perch. *Ecology of Freshwater Fish*, 18, 560-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00371.x

Hjelm, J., Persson, L., & Christensen, B. (2000). Growth, morphological variation and ontogenetic niche shifts in perch (Perca fluviatilis) in relation to resource availability. *Oecologia*, 122, 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008846

Hjelm, J., Svanback, R., Bystrom, P., Persson, L., & Wahlstrom, E. (2001). Diet-dependent body morphology and ontogenetic reaction norms in Eurasian perch. *Oikos*, 95, 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950213.x

Hoffmann, R. W., Meder, J., Klein, M., Osterkorn, J., & Negele, R. D. (1986). Studies on lesions caused by plerocercoids of Triaenophorus nodulosus in some fish of an alpine lake, the Königssee. *Journal of Fish Biology*, 28, 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb05204.x

Hofmann, F., & Raymond, J.-C. (2014). Fishing trends in Lake Geneva. In C.I.D.P.D.E.D. Léman (Ed.), *Rapport de la commission internationale de Protection des eaux du Léman, Campagne 2013* (pp. 163-174). Commission internationale de protection des eaux du Léman. http://www.cipel.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/peche.pdfs

Huss, M., Byström, P., Strand, A., Eriksson, L.-O., & Persson, L. (2008). Influence of growth history on the accumulation of energy reserves and winter mortality in young fish. *Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences*, 65, 2149-2156. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-115

Iwanowicz, D. D. (2011). Overview on the effects of parasites on fish health. In *Proceedings of the Third Bilateral Conference between Russia and the United States. Bridging America and Russia with Shared Perspectives on Aquatic Animal Health* (pp. 176-184).

Ishizaki, Y., Masuda, R., Uematsu, K., Shimizu, K., Arimoto, M., & Takeuchi, T. (2001). The effect of dietary docosahexaenoic acid on schooling
behavior and brain development in larval yellowtail. *Journal of Fish Biology*, **58**, 1691-1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02323.x

Jacquet, S., Barbet, D., Cachera, S., Colon, M., Espinat, L., Girel, C., ... Savoye, L. (2015). *Suivi environnemental des eaux du lac du Bourget pour l'année 2014* (pp. 197). INRA-CISALB-CALB. http://www.cis-alb.com/data/file/site/fichiers/suivilac/suivi_ecologique_lac_bourget_2014.pdf

Jacquet, S., Briand, J. F., Leboulanger, C., Avois-Jacquet, C., Oberhaus, L., Tassin, B., ... Humbert, J. F. (2005). The proliferation of the toxic cyanobacterium *Planktothrix rubescens* following restoration of the largest natural French lake (Lac du Bourget). *Harmful Algae*, **4**, 651-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2003.12.006

Johnson, M. W., & Dick, T. A. (2001). Parasite effects on the survival, growth, and reproductive potential of yellow perch (*Perca flavescens* Mitchill) in Canadian Shield lakes. *Canadian Journal of Zoology*, **79**, 1980-1992. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-155

Kainz, M., & Mazumder, A. (2005). Effect of algal and bacterial diet on methyl mercury concentrations in zooplankton. *Environmental science & technology*, **39**(6), 1666-1672. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049119o

Keast, A., & Eadie, J. M. (1985). Growth depensation in year-0 large-mouth bass: The influence of diet. *Transactions of the American Fisheries Society*, **114**, 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1985)114&lt;204:GDIYLB&g;2.0.CO;2

Kuchta, R., Vickova, R., Pod dubnaya, L. G., Gustinelli, A., Dzika, E., & Scholz, T. (2007). Invalidity of three Palaearctic species of *Triaenophorus* tapeworms (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): Evidence from morphometric analysis of scolex hooks. *Folia Parasitologica*, **54**, 34. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2007.005

Kuperman, B. I. (1973). *Tapeworms of the genus Triaenophorus, parasites of fishes* (viii-+222 pp). Victoria, BC: AbeBooks.

Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., & Kuris, A. M. (2006). Parasites dominate food web links. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, **103**, 11211-11216. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604755103

Lange, B., Reuter, M., Ebert, D., Muylaert, K., & Decaestecker, E. (2014). Diet quality determines interspecific parasite interactions in host populations. *Ecology and Evolution*, **4**, 3093-3102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1167

Le Cren, E. D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (*Perca fluviatilis*). *The Journal of Animal Ecology*, **20**, 201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540

Lleonart, J., Salat, J., & Torres, G. J. (2000). Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. *Journal of Theoretical Biology*, **205**, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043

Loot, G., Brosse, S., Lek, S., & Guégan, J.-F. (2001). Behaviour of roach (*Rutilus rutilus* L.) altered by Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): A field demonstration. *Freshwater Biology*, **46**, 1219-1227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00733.x

Masson, S., Angeli, N., Guillard, J., & Pinel-Alloul, B. (2001). Diel vertical and horizontal distribution of crustacean zooplankton and young of the year fish in a sub-alpine lake: An approach based on high frequency sampling. *Journal of Plankton Research*, **23**, 1041-1060. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/23.10.1041

Masson, G., Vanacker, M., Fox, M. G., & Beisel, J. N. (2015). Impact of the cestode *Triaenophorus nodulosus* on the exotic Lepomis gibbosus and the autochthonous *Perca fluviatilis*. *Parasitology*, **142**, 745-755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182014001826

May, R. M., & Anderson, R. M. (1978). Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: II. Destabilizing processes. *Journal of Animal Ecology*, **47**, 249-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3934

Mélard, C., Kestemont, P., & Grignard, J. C. (1996). Intensive culture of juvenile and adult Eurasian perch (*P. fluviatilis*): Effect of major biotic and abiotic factors on growth. *Journal of Applied Ichthyology*, **12**, 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1996.tb00085.x

Müller-Navarra, D., & Lampert, W. (1996). Seasonal patterns of food limitation in Daphnia galeata: Separating food quantity and food quality effects. *Journal of Plankton Research*, **18**(7), 1137-1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/18.7.1137

Paine, R. T. (1980). Food webs: Linkage, interaction strength, and community infrastructure. *Journal of Animal Ecology*, **49**, 667-685.

Parrish, C. C. (1999). Determination of total lipid, lipid classes, and fatty acids in aquatic samples. In M. T. Arts, & B. C. Wainman (Eds.), *Lipids in freshwater ecosystems* (pp. 4-20). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0547-0

Perga, M. E., Barbier, C., Colon, M., Frossard, V., Guillard, J., Hamelet, V., ... Rimet, F. (2016). *Suivi de la qualité des eaux du lac d'Annecy, rapport 2015* (p. 122). SILA-INRA.

Perga, M. E., Bec, A., & Anneville, O. (2009). Origins of carbon sustaining the growth of whitefish Coregonus lavaretus early larval stages in Lake Annecy: Insights from fatty-acid biomarkers. *Journal of Fish Biology*, **74**, 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02105.x

Perga, M.-E., Frossard, V., Jenny, J.-P., Alric, B., Arnaud, F., Berthon, V., ... Verneaux, V. (2015). High-resolution paleolimnology opens new management perspectives for lakes adaptation to climate warming. *Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution*, **3**, 72.

Perga, M.-E., & Gerdeaux, D. (2004). Changes in the d¹³C of pelagic food webs: The influence of lake area and trophic status on the isotopic signature of Whitefish (*Coregonus lavaretus*). *Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences*, **61**, 1485-1492. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-089

Perga, M.-E., & Gerdeaux, D. (2005). 'Are fish what they eat'... all year long? *Oecologia*, **144**, 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0069-5

Persson, L., Bystrom, P., Wahlstrom, E., & Westman, E. (2004). Trophic dynamics in a whole lake experiment: Size-structured interactions and recruitment variation. *Oikos*, **106**, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12767.x

Persson, L., & Greenberg, L. A. (1990). Optimal foraging and habitat shift in perch (*Perca fluviatilis*) in a resource gradient. *Ecology*, **71**, 1699-1713. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937579

Post, J. R., & Evans, D. O. (1989). Size-dependent overwinter mortality of young-of-the-year yellow perch (*Perca flavescens*): Laboratory, in situ enclosure, and field experiments. *Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences*, **46**, 1958-1968. https://doi.org/10.1139/f89-246

Poulin, R. (2007). The structure of parasite communities in fish hosts: Ecology meets geography and climate. *Parasitologia*, **49**, 169.

Pulkkinen, K., Wojewodzic, M. W., & Hessen, D. O. (2014). Phosphorus limitation enhances parasite impact: Feedback effects at the population level. *BMC Ecology*, **14**, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-014-0029-1

R Core Development Team (2008). *R: A language and environment for statistical computing*. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Riccardi, N., & Rossetti, G. (2007). Eudiaptomus gracilis in Italy: How, where and why. *Journal of Limnology*, **66**, 64-69. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2007.64

Sargent, J., Bell, G., McEvoy, L., Tocher, D., & Estevez, A. (1999). Recent developments in the essential fatty acid nutrition of fish. *Aquaculture*, **177**, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00083-6

Sargent, J., McEvoy, L., Estevez, A., Bell, G., Bell, M., Henderson, J., & Tocher, D. (1999). Lipid nutrition of marine fish during early development: Current status and future directions. *Aquaculture*, **179**, 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00191-X

Skinner, M. M., Martin, A. A., & Moore, B. C. (2016). Is lipid correction necessary in the stable isotope analysis of fish tissues? *Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry*, **30**, 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7480

Smyntek, P. M., Teece, M. A., Schulz, K. L., & Storch, A. J. (2008). Taxonomic differences in the essential fatty acid composition of
groups of freshwater zooplankton relate to reproductive demands and generation time. *Freshwater Biology*, **53**, 1768–1782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02001.x

Sommer, U., Stibor, H., Katechakis, A., Sommer, F., & Hansen, T. (2002). Pelagic food web configurations at different levels of nutrient richness and their implications for the ratio fish production: Primary production. In O. Vadstein, & Y. Olsen (Eds.), *Sustainable increase of marine harvesting: Fundamental mechanisms and new concepts* (pp. 11–20). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3190-4

Syväranta, J., & Rautio, M. (2010). Zooplankton, lipids and stable isotopes: Importance of seasonal, latitudinal, and taxonomic differences. *Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences*, **67**, 1721–1729. https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-091

Tapolczai, K., Anneville, O., Padisak, J., Salmaso, N., Morabito, G., Zohary, T., ... Rimet, F. (2015). Occurrence and mass development of *Mougeotia* spp. (Zygnemataceae) in large, deep lakes. *Hydrobiologia*, **745**, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2086-z

Washburn, J. O., Mercer, D. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). Regulatory role of parasites: Impact on host population shifts with resource availability. *Science*, **253**, 185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1906637

Watson, M. J. (2013). What drives population-level effects of parasites? *Meta-analysis meets life history. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife*, **2**, 190–196.

Wickham, S. A. (1995). Trophic relations between cyclopoid copepods and ciliated protists: complex interactions link the microbial and classic food webs. *Limnology and Oceanography*, **40**(6), 1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.6.1173

## SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.

**How to cite this article:** Frantz A, Perga M-E, Guillard J. Parasitic versus nutritional regulation of natural fish populations. *Ecol Evol*. 2018;8:8713–8725. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4391