96. Razzaghi, F.; Plauborg, F.; Jacobsen, S.-E.; Jensen, C.R.; Andersen, M.N. Effect of nitrogen and water availability of three soil types on yield, radiation use efficiency and evapotranspiration in field-grown quinoa. *Agric. Water Manag.* **2012**, *109*, 20–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.02.002.

97. Fghire, R.; Wahbi, S.; Anaya, F.; Ali, O.I.; Benlhabib, O.; Ragab, R. Response of Quinoa to Different Water Management Strategies: Field Experiments and Saltmed Model Application Results. *Irrig. Drain.* **2015**, *64*, 29–40, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1895.

98. Pulvento, C.; Riccardi, M.; Lavini, A.; D'Andria, R.; Ragab, R. Saltmed Model to Simulate Yield And Dry Matter for Quinoa Crop And Soil Moisture Content Under Different Irrigation Strategies In South Italy. *Irrig. Drain.* **2013**, *62*, 229–238, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1727.

99. Bertero, H.D. Quinoa. In *Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops*; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819194-1-00007-4.

100. Geren, H.; Kavut, Y.; Altınbaş, M. Effect of different row spacings on the grain yield and some yield characteristics of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) under Bornova ecological conditions. *Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi* **2015**, *52*, 69–78.

101. Erley, G.S.A.; Kaul, H.-P.; Kruse, M.; Aufhammer, W. Yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of the pseudocereals amaranth, quinoa, and buckwheat under differing nitrogen fertilization. *Eur. J. Agron.* **2005**, *22*, 95–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.11.002.

102. Alandia, G.; Jacobsen, S.-E.; Kyvsgaard, N.C.; Condori, B.; Liu, F. Nitrogen Sustains Seed Yield of Quinoa Under Intermediate Drought. *J. Agron. Crop. Sci.* **2016**, *202*, 281–291, https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12155.

103. Bascuñán-Godoy, L.; Sanhueza, C.; Pinto, K.; Cifuentes, L.; Reguera, M.; Briones-Labarca, V.; Zurita-Silva, A.; Álvarez, R.; Morales, A.; Silva, H. Nitrogen physiology of contrasting genotypes of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Amaranthaceae). *Sci. Rep.* **2018**, *8*, 17524, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34656-5.

104. Cruces, L.; Delgado, P.; Santivañez, T.; Jara, B.; Vernal, P. Guía de Identificación y Control de las Principales Plagas que Afectan a la Quinua en la Zona Andina. 2016. Available online: https://bivica.org/files/quinua-plagas.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2021).

105. Rupavatharam, S.; Kennepohl, A.; Kummer, B.; Parimi, V. Automated plant disease diagnosis using innovative android App (Plantix) for farmers in Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. *Phytopathology TSI* **2018**, *108*, 10.

106. Brachi, B.; Aime, C.; Glorieux, C.; Cuguen, J.; Roux, F. Adaptive Value of Phenological Traits in Stressful Environments: Predictions Based on Seed Production and Laboratory Natural Selection. *PLoS ONE* **2012**, *7*, e32069, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032069.

107. Rausher, M.D. The Measurement of Selection on Quantitative Traits: Biases Due to Environmental Covariances between Traits and Fitness. *Evolution* **1992**, *46*, 616–626, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02070.x.

108. De Leon, N.; Jannink, J.-L.; Edwards, J.W.; Kaeppeler, S.M. Introduction to a Special Issue on Genotype by Environment Interaction. *Crop. Sci.* **2016**, *56*, 2081–2089, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0002in.

109. Condon, J. Effective Soil Sampling-High and Low Cost Options to Gain Soil Fertility Information for Management. GRDC. 2019. Available online: https://grdc.com.au/resources-and-publications/grdc-update-papers/tab-content/grdc-update-papers/2019/02/effective-soil-sampling-high-and-low-cost-options-to-gain-soil-fertility-information-for-management. (accessed on 15 August 2021).

110. Xu, Y. Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants. *Theor. Appl. Genet.* **2016**, *129*, 653–673, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2691-5.

111. Fricke, W. Water transport and energy. *Plant. Cell Environ.* **2017**, *40*, 977–994, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12848.

112. Zhang, D.; Du, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Jiao, X.; Song, X.; Li, J. Vapour pressure deficit control in relation to water transport and water productivity in greenhouse tomato production during summer. *Sci. Rep.* **2017**, *7*, 43461, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43461.

113. Kargas, G.; Londra, P.; Anastasatou, M.; Moustakas, N. The Effect of Soil Iron on the Estimation of Soil Water Content Using Dielectric Sensors. *Water* **2020**, *12*, 598, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020598.

114. Präger, A.; Boote, K.J.; Munz, S.; Graeff-Hönninger, S. Simulating Growth and Development Processes of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Adaptation and Evaluation of the CSM-CROPGRO Model. *Agronomy* **2019**, *9*, 832, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120832.

115. Alvar-Beltrán, J.; Gobin, A.; Orlandini, S.; Marta, A.D. AquaCrop parametrisation for quinoa in arid environments. *Ital. J. Agron.* **2020**, *16*, https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2020.1749.

116. Geerts, S.; Raes, D.; Garcia, M. Using AquaCrop to derive deficit irrigation schedules. *Agric. Water Manag.* **2010**, *98*, 213–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.003.

117. Geerts, S.; Raes, D.; Garcia, M.; Miranda, R.; Cusicanqui, J.A.; Taboada, C.; Mendoza, J.; Huanca, R.; Mamani, A.; Condori, O.; et al. Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop. *Agron. J.* **2009**, *101*, 499–508, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0137s.

118. Geerts, S.; Raes, D.; Garcia, M.; Taboada, C.; Miranda, R.; Cusicanqui, J.; Mhizha, T.; Vacher, J. Modeling the potential for closing quinoa yield gaps under varying water availability in the Bolivian Altiplano. *Agric. Water Manag.* **2009**, *96*, 1652–1658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.020.

119. Kaoutar, F.; Abdelaziz, H.; Ouafae, B.; Redouane, C.-A.; Ragab, R. Yield and Dry Matter Simulation Using the Saltmed Model for Five Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa) Accessions Under Deficit Irrigation in South Morocco. *Irrig. Drain.* **2017**, *66*, 340–350, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2116.

120. FAO. Required Input for Simulations with AquaCrop. 2016. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i6050e/i6050e.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2021).
121. Vanuytrecht, E.; Raes, D.; Steduto, P.; Hsiao, T.C.; Fereres, E.; Heng, L.K.; Garcia-Vila, M.; Moreno, P.M. AquaCrop: FAO's crop water productivity and yield response model. *Environ. Model. Softw.* **2014**, *62*, 351–360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.005.

122. Ragab, R. A holistic generic integrated approach for irrigation, crop and field management: The SALTMED model. *Environ. Model. Softw.* **2002**, *17*, 345–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00079-2.

123. Bertero, D.; Medan, D.; Hall, A.J. Changes in Apical Morphology during Floral Initiation and Reproductive Development in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). *Ann. Bot.* **1996**, *78*, 317–324, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0126.

124. Curti, R.; de la Vega, A.; Andrade, A.; Bramardi, S.; Bertero, H. Multi-environmental evaluation for grain yield and its physiological determinants of quinoa genotypes across Northwest Argentina. *Field Crop. Res.* **2014**, *166*, 46–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.011.

125. Jacobsen, S.-E.; Stølen, O. Quinoa-Morphology, phenology and prospects for its production as a new crop in Europe. *Eur. J. Agron.* **1993**, *2*, 19–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(14)80148-2.

126. Mujica, A.; Canahua, A. Fases fenológicas del cultivo de la quínua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). In Proceedings of the Curso Taller 1989, Fenología de Cultivos Andinos y Uso de La Información Agrometeorológica, Salcedo, Puno, Peru 7–10 August 1989; pp. 23–27.

127. Ruiz, R.; Bertero, H. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. *Eur. J. Agron.* **2008**, *29*, 144–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.05.003.

128. Tardieu, F. Plant response to environmental conditions: Assessing potential production, water demand, and negative effects of water deficit. *Front. Physiol.* **2013**, *4*, 17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00017.

129. Tardieu, F.; Bosquet, L.C.; Welcker, C. Model assisted dissection of the Genotype x Environment interaction. In Proceedings of the ASA 2012, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings; Cincinnati, OH, USA, 21–24 October 2012.

130. Tardieu, F.; Tuberosa, R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. *Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol.* **2010**, *13*, 206–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.012.

131. Passioura, J.; Angus, J. Improving Productivity of Crops in Water-Limited Environments. *Adv. Agron.* **2010**, *106*, 37–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(10)06002-5.

132. Trapani, N.; Hall, A.; Sadras, V.; Vilella, F. Ontogenetic changes in radiation use efficiency of sunflower (*Helianthus annuus* L.) crops. *Field Crop. Res.* **1992**, *29*, 301–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90032-5.

133. Grimes, D.J. Koch's Postulates—Then and Now. *Microbe Mag.* **2006**, *1*, 223–228, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.1.2231.1.

134. Gómez, M.B.; Castro, P.A.; Mignone, C.; Bertero, H.D. Can yield potential be increased by manipulation of reproductive partitioning in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)? Evidence from gibberellic acid synthesis inhibition using Paclobutrazol. *Funct. Plant. Biol.* **2011**, *38*, 420–430, https://doi.org/10.1071/fp10168.

135. Garbulsky, M.; Peñuelas, J.; Gamon, J.; Inoue, Y.; Filella, I. The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) and the Remote Sensing of leaf, canopy and ecosystem radiation use efficiencies: A review and meta-analysis. *Remote Sens. Environ.* **2011**, *115*, 281–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.023.

136. Hinojosa, L.; Kumar, N.; Gill, K.S.; Murphy, K.M. Spectral Reflectance Indices and Physiological Parameters in Quinoa under Contrasting Irrigation Regimes. *Crop. Sci.* **2019**, *59*, 1927–1944, https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.11.0711.

137. Sankaran, S.; Espinoza, C.Z.; Hinojosa, L.; Ma, X.; Murphy, K. High-Throughput Field Phenotyping to Assess Irrigation Treatment Effects in Quinoa. *Age* **2019**, *2*, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.2134/age2018.12.0063.

138. Danielsen, S.; Munk, L. Evaluation of disease assessment methods in quinoa for their ability to predict yield loss caused by downy mildew. *Crop. Prot.* **2004**, *23*, 219–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.010.

139. Xie, C.; Yang, C. A review on plant high-throughput phenotyping traits using UAV-based sensors. *Comput. Electron. Agric.* **2020**, *178*, 105731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105731.

140. Tmušić, G.; Manfreda, S.; Aasen, H.; James, M.R.; Gonçalves, G.; Ben-Dor, E.; Brook, A.; Polinova, M.; Arranz, J.J.; Mészáros, J.; et al. Current Practices in UAS-based Environmental Monitoring. *Remote Sens.* **2020**, *12*, 1001, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061001.

141. Yang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhao, C.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H.; Xu, B.; Yang, X.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, X.; et al. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sens.ing for Field-Based Crop Phenotyping: Current Status and Perspectives. *Front. Plant. Sci.* **2017**, *8*, 1111, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01111.

142. Ziliani, M.G.; Parkes, S.D.; Hoteit, I.; McCabe, M.F. Intra-Season Crop Height Variability at Commercial Farm Scales Using a Fixed-Wing UAV. *Remote Sens.* **2018**, *10*, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122007.

143. Johansen, K.; Morton, M.J.L.; Malbeteau, Y.; Aragon, B.; Al-Mashharawi, S.; Ziliani, M.G.; Angel, Y.; Fiene, G.; Negrão, S.; Mousa, M.A.A.; et al. Predicting Biomass and Yield in a Tomato Phenotyping Experiment Using UAV Imagery and Random Forest. *Front. Artif. Intell.* **2020**, *3*, https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00028.

144. Di Gennaro, S.F.; Rizza, F.; Badeck, F.-W.; Berton, A.; Delbono, S.; Gioli, B.; Toscano, P.; Zaldei, A.; Matese, A. UAV-based high-throughput phenotyping to discriminate barley vigour with visible and near-infrared vegetation indices. *Int. J. Remote Sens.* **2018**, *39*, 5330–5344, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1395974.

145. Wang, T.; Thomasson, J.A.; Yang, C.; Isakeit, T.; Nichols, R.L. Automatic Classification of Cotton Root Rot Disease Based on UAV Remote Sensing. *Remote Sens.* **2020**, *12*, 1310, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081310.

146. Su, J.; Liu, C.; Coombes, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, X.; Li, Q.; Guo, L.; Chen, W.-H. Wheat yellow rust monitoring by learning from multispectral UAV aerial imagery. *Comput. Electron. Agric.* **2018**, *155*, 157–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.017.
147. Chivasa, W.; Mutanga, O.; Biradar, C. UAV-Based Multispectral Phenotyping for Disease Resistance to Accelerate Crop Improvement under Changing Climate Conditions. *Remote Sens.* **2020**, *12*, 2445, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152445.

148. Holman, F.H.; Riche, A.B.; Castle, M.; Wooster, M.J.; Hawkesford, M.J. Radiometric Calibration of 'Commercial off the Shelf' Cameras for UAV-Based High-Resolution Temporal Crop Phenotyping of Reflectance and NDVI. *Remote Sens.* **2019**, *11*, 1657, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141657.

149. Jackson, R.D.; Idso, S.B.; Reginato, R.J.; Pinter, P.J. Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. *Water Resour. Res.* **1981**, *17*, 1133–1138, https://doi.org/10.1029/wr017i004p01133.

150. Turner, D.; Lucieer, A.; Watson, C. An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds. *Remote Sens.* **2012**, *4*, 1392–1410, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4051392.

151. Shendryk, Y.; Sofonia, J.; Garrard, R.; Rist, Y.; Skocaj, D.; Thorburn, P. Fine-scale prediction of biomass and leaf nitrogen content in sugarcane using UAV LiDAR and multispectral imaging. *Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.* **2020**, *92*, 102177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102177.

152. Messina, G.; Modica, G. Applications of UAV Thermal Imagery in Precision Agriculture: State of the Art and Future Research Outlook. *Remote Sens.* **2020**, *12*, 1491, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091491.

153. Aragon, B.; Johansen, K.; Parkes, S.; Malbeteau, Y.; Al-Mashharawi, S.; Al-Amoudi, T.; Andrade, C.F.; Turner, D.; Lucieer, A.; McCabe, M.F. A Calibration Procedure for Field and UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Instruments. *Sensors* **2020**, *20*, 3316, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113316.

154. Kelly, J.; Kljun, N.; Olsson, P.-O.; Mihai, L.; Liljeblad, B.; Weslien, P.; Klemedtsson, L.; Eklundh, L. Challenges and Best Practices for Deriving Temperature Data from an Uncalibrated UAV Thermal Infrared Camera. *Remote Sens.* **2019**, *11*, 567, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050567.

155. Malbeteau, Y.; Johansen, K.; Aragon, B.; Al-Mashhawari, S.K.; McCabe, M.F. Overcoming the challenges of thermal infrared orthomosaics using a swath-based approach to correct for dynamic temperature and wind effects. *Remote Sens.* **2021**, *13*, 3255.

156. Aasen, H.; Bolten, A. Multi-temporal high-resolution imaging spectroscopy with hyperspectral 2D imagers-From theory to application. *Remote Sens. Environ.* **2018**, *205*, 374–389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.043.

157. Adão, T.; Hruška, J.; Pádua, L.; Bessa, J.; Peres, E.; Morais, R.; Sousa, J.J. Hyperspectral Imaging: A Review on UAV-Based Sensors, Data Processing and Applications for Agriculture and Forestry. *Remote Sens.* **2017**, *9*, 1110, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111110.

158. Angel, Y.; Turner, D.; Parkes, S.; Malbeteau, Y.; Lucieer, A.; McCabe, M.F. Automated Georectification and Mosaicking of UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imagery from Push-Broom Sensors. *Remote Sens.* **2020**, *12*, 34, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010034.

159. Barreto, M.A.P.; Johansen, K.; Angel, Y.; McCabe, M.F. Radiometric Assessment of a UAV-Based Push-Broom Hyperspectral Camera. *Sensors* **2019**, *19*, 4699, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214699.

160. Hassler, S.C.; Baysal-Gurel, F. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Technology and Applications in Agriculture. *Agron.* **2019**, *9*, 618, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100618.

161. Ivushkin, K.; Bartholomeus, H.; Bregt, A.K.; Pulatov, A.; Franceschini, M.H.; Kramer, H.; van Loo, E.N.; Roman, V.J.; Finkers, R. UAV based soil salinity assessment of cropland. *Geoderma* **2019**, *338*, 502–512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.046.

162. Holman, F.H.; Riche, A.B.; Michalski, A.; Castle, M.; Wooster, M.J.; Hawkesford, M.J. High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing. *Remote Sens.* **2016**, *8*, 1031, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121031.

163. Galli, G.; Sabadin, F.; Costa-Neto, G.M.F.; Fritsche-Neto, R. A novel way to validate UAS-based high-throughput phenotyping protocols using in silico experiments for plant breeding purposes. *Theor. Appl. Genet.* **2020**, *134*, 715–730, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03726-6.

164. Keller, B.; Matsubara, S.; Rascher, U.; Pieruschka, R.; Steier, A.; Kraska, T.; Muller, O. Genotype Specific Photosynthesis x Environment Interactions Captured by Automated Fluorescence Canopy Scans Over Two Fluctuating Growing Seasons. *Front. Plant. Sci.* **2019**, *10*, 1482, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01482.

165. Raesch, A.R.; Muller, O.; Pieruschka, R.; Rascher, U. Field Observations with Laser-Induced Fluorescence Transient (LIFT) Method in Barley and Sugar Beet. *Agriculture* **2014**, *4*, 159–169, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture4020159.

166. Pieruschka, R.; Schurr, U. Plant Phenotyping: Past, Present, and Future. *Plant. Phenomics* **2019**, *2019*, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/7507131.

167. Mochida, K.; Koda, S.; Inoue, K.; Hirayama, T.; Tanaka, S.; Nishii, R.; Melgani, F. Computer vision-based phenotyping for improvement of plant productivity: A machine learning perspective. *GigaScience* **2018**, *8*, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy153.

168. Ubbens, J.; Cieslak, M.; Prusinkiewicz, P.; Parkin, I.; Ebersbach, J.; Stavness, I. Latent Space Phenotyping: Automatic Image-Based Phenotyping for Treatment Studies. *Plant. Phenomics* **2020**, *2020*, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/5801869.

169. Brunner, G.; Liu, Y.; Pascual, D.; Richter, O.; Ciaramita, M.; Wattenhofer, R. On Identifiability in Transformers. *arXiv* **2019**, arXiv:1908.04211, http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04211.

170. Chefer, H.; Gur, S.; Wolf, L. Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualization. 2021. Available online: https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2021/html/Chefer_Transformer_Interpretability_Beyond_Attention_Visualization_CVPR_2021_paper.html (accessed on 15 August 2021).
171. Mastebroek, H.; van Loo, E.; Dolstra, O. Combining ability for seed yield traits of Chenopodium quinoa breeding lines. *Euphytica* **2002**, *125*, 427–432, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016030129541.

172. Ploschuk, E.L.; Hall, A. Capitulum position in sunflower affects grain temperature and duration of grain filling. *Field Crop. Res.* **1995**, *44*, 111–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00079-8.

173. Dong, Y.; Ewang, Y.-Z. Seed shattering: From models to crops. *Front. Plant. Sci.* **2015**, *6*, 476, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00476.

174. Peterson, A.; Jacobsen, S.-E.; Bonifacio, A.; Murphy, K. A Crossing Method for Quinoa. *Sustainability* **2015**, *7*, 3230–3243, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033230.

175. Colque-Little, C.; Amby, D.; Andreasen, C. A Review of *Chenopodium quinoa* (Willd.) Diseases-An Updated Perspective. *Plants* **2021**, *10*, 1228, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061228.

176. Agrios, G. *Plant Pathology*; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.

177. Lamichhane, J.R.; Venturi, V. Synergisms between microbial pathogens in plant disease complexes: A growing trend. *Front. Plant. Sci.* **2015**, *6*, 385, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00385.

178. Danielsen, S.; Jacobsen, S.-E.; Hockenhull, J. First Report of Downy Mildew of Quinoa Caused by Peronospora farinosa f. sp. chenopodii in Denmark. *Plant. Dis.* **2002**, *86*, 1175-1175, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2002.86.10.1175b.

179. Testen, A.; McKemy, J.M.; Backman, P.A. First Report of Passalora Leaf Spot of Quinoa Caused by Passalora dubia in the United States. *Plant. Dis.* **2013**, *97*, 139–139, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-12-0472-pdn.

180. Testen, A.; McKemy, J.M.; Backman, P.A. First Report of Ascochyta Leaf Spot of Quinoa Caused by Ascochyta sp. in the United States. *Plant. Dis.* **2013**, *97*, 844–844, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-11-12-1008-pdn.

181. Testen, A.; Jiménez-Gasco, M.D.M.; Ochoa, J.B.; Backman, P.A. Molecular Detection of Peronospora variabilis in Quinoa Seed and Phylogeny of the Quinoa Downy Mildew Pathogen in South America and the United States. *Phytopathology* **2014**, *104*, 379–386, https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-07-13-0198-r.

182. Yin, H.; Zhou, J.; Lv, H.; Qin, N.; Chang, F.J.; Zhao, X.J. Identification, Pathogenicity, and Fungicide Sensitivity of Ascochyta caulina (Teleomorph: Neocamarosporium calvescens) Associated with Black Stem on Quinoa in China. *Plant. Dis.* **2020**, *104*, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-09-19-2042-re.

183. Dřímalková, M.; Veverka, K. Seedlings damping-off of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. *Plant. Prot. Sci.* **2004**, *40*, 5–10, https://doi.org/10.17221/3119-pps.

184. Fonseca-Guerra, I.; Chiquillo, C.; Padilla, M.J.; Benavides-Rozo, M. First report of bacterial leaf spot on Chenopodium quinoa caused by Pseudomonas syringae in Colombia. *J. Plant. Dis. Prot.* **2021**, *128*, 871–874, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00435-0.

185. Isobe, K.; Sugiyama, T.; Katagiri, M.; Ishizuka, C.; Tamura, Y.; Higo, M.; Fujita, Y. Study on the Cause Damping-off in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and a Method for Suppressing its Occurrence. *Jpn. J. Crop. Sci.* **2019**, *88*, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.88.117.

186. Pal, N.; Testen, A.L. First Report of Quinoa Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum nigrum and C. truncatum in the United States. *Plant. Dis.* **2021**, *105*, 705–705, https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-07-20-1568-pdn.

187. Danielsen, S.; Ames, T. Mildew (Peronospora farinosa) of quinua (Chenopodium quinoa) in the Andean Region: Practical Manual for the Study of the Disease and Pathogen; International Potato Center: Lima, Peru, 2004.

188. Staub, J.; Bacher, J.; Poetter, K. Sources of Potential Errors in the Application of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs in Cucumber. *HortScience* **1996**, *31*, 262–266, https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.31.2.262.

189. Conrath, U. Molecular aspects of defence priming. *Trends Plant. Sci.* **2011**, *16*, 524–531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.004.

190. Hammerschmidt, R.; M'Etraux, J.-P.; Van Loon, L. Inducing Resistance: A Summary of Papers Presented at the First International Symposium on Induced Resistance to Plant Diseases, Corfu, May 2000. *Eur. J. Plant. Pathol.* **2001**, *107*, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008753630626.

191. Grogan, R.G. The Science and Art of Plant-Disease Diagnosis. *Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.* **1981**, *19*, 333–351, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.19.0909181.002001.

192. Pereira, E.; Encina-Zelada, C.; Barros, L.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; Cadavez, V.; Ferreira, I.C. Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (quinoa) grains: A good alternative to nutritious food. *Food Chem.* **2019**, *280*, 110–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.068.

193. Merchant, N.; Lyons, E.; Goff, S.; Vaughn, M.; Ware, D.; Micklos, D.; Antin, P. The iPlant Collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for Enabling Data to Discovery for the Life Sciences. *PLoS Biol.* **2016**, *14*, e1002342, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002342.

194. Nowak, V.; Du, J.; Charrondière, U.R. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). *Food Chem.* **2016**, *193*, 47–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.111.

195. Valencia-Chamorro, S.A. QUINOA. In *Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition*; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 4895–4902.

196. Aluwi, N.A.; Gu, B.-J.; Dhumal, G.S.; Medina-Meza, I.G.; Murphy, K.M.; Ganjyal, G.M. Impacts of Scarification and Degermination on the Expansion Characteristics of Select Quinoa Varieties during Extrusion Processing. *J. Food Sci.* **2016**, *81*, E2939–E2949, https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13512.

197. Foley, W.J.; McIlwee, A.; Lawler, I.; Aragones, L.; Woolnough, A.P.; Berding, N. Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy-a tool for rapid, cost-effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance. *Oecologia* **1998**, *116*, 293–305, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050591.
198. Lane, H.M.; Murray, S.C.; Montesinos-López, O.A.; Montesinos-López, A.; Crossa, J.; Rooney, D.K.; Barrero-Farfan, I.D.; De La Fuente, G.N.; Morgan, C.L.S. Phenomic selection and prediction of maize grain yield from near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy of kernels. *TPPJ* **2020**, *3*, e20002, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20002.

199. Escuredo, O.; Martín, M.I.G.; Moncada, G.W.; Fischer, S.; Hierro, J.M.H. Amino acid profile of the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric techniques. *J. Cereal Sci.* **2014**, *60*, 67–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.01.016.

200. Rodríguez, S.D.; Rolandelli, G.; Buera, M.P. Detection of quinoa flour adulteration by means of FT-MIR spectroscopy combined with chemometric methods. *Food Chem.* **2019**, *274*, 392–401, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.140.

201. Roa-Acosta, D.F.; Bravo-Gómez, J.E.; García-Parra, M.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Solanilla-Duque, J.F. Hyper-protein quinoa flour (Chenopodium Quinoa Wild): Monitoring and study of structural and rheological properties. *LWT* **2020**, *121*, 108952, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108952.

202. Morais, C.L.M.; Santos, M.C.D.; Lima, K.M.G.; Martin, F.L. Improving data splitting for classification applications in spectrochemical analyses employing a random-mutation Kennard-Stone algorithm approach. *Bioinformatics* **2019**, *35*, 5257–5263, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz421.

203. Horwitz, W. *Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International*; Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2019.

204. Agelet, L.E.; Hurburgh, C.R. A Tutorial on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Its Calibration. *Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.* **2010**, *40*, 246–260, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2010.515468.

205. Rinnan, Å.; Berg, F.V.D.; Engelsen, S.B. Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. *TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.* **2009**, *28*, 1201–1222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007.

206. Craine, E.B.; Murphy, K.M. Seed Composition and Amino Acid Profiles for Quinoa Grown in Washington State. *Front. Nutr.* **2020**, *7*, 126, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00126.

207. Kuljanabhagavad, T.; Thongphasuk, P.; Chamulitrat, W.; Wink, M. Triterpene saponins from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. *Phytochemistry* **2008**, *69*, 1919–1926, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.001.

208. Madl, T.; Sterk, H.; Mittelbach, M.; Rechberger, G.N. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of a complex triterpene saponin mixture of Chenopodium quinoa. *J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.* **2006**, *17*, 795–806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2006.02.013.

209. Woldemichael, G.M.; Wink, M. Identification and biological activities of triterpenoid saponins from Chenopodium quinoa. *J. Agric. Food Chem.* **2001**, *49*, 2327–2332, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0013499.

210. Otterbach, S.; Wellman, G.; Schmöckel, S.M. Saponins of Quinoa: Structure, Function and Opportunities. In *The Quinoa Genome*; Schmöckel, S.M., Ed.; Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021, pp. 119–138, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_8

211. Koziol, M.J. Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). *J. Sci. Food Agric.* **1991**, *54*, 211–219, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540206.

212. Hirich, A.; Rafik, S.; Rahmani, M.; Fetouab, A.; Azaykou, F.; Filali, K.; Ahmadzai, H.; Jnaoui, Y.; Soulaimani, A.; Moussafir, M.; et al. Development of Quinoa Value Chain to Improve Food and Nutritional Security in Rural Communities in Rehamna, Morocco: Lessons Learned and Perspectives. *Plants* **2021**, *10*, 301, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020301.

213. Afzal, I.; Kamran, M.; Basra, S.M.A.; Khan, S.H.U.; Mahmood, A.; Farooq, M.; Tan, D.K. Harvesting and post-harvest management approaches for preserving cottonseed quality. *Ind. Crop. Prod.* **2020**, *155*, 112842, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112842.

214. Hong, T.D.; Linington, S.; Ellis, R.H. Seed Storage Behaviour: A Compendium. Handbooks for Genebanks No. 4. In *Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates*; 1996. Available online: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/105158 (accessed on 15 August 2021).

215. Hong, T.D.; Ellis, R.H. *A Protocol to Determine Seed Storage Behaviour*; IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 1; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI); Rome, Italy, 1996.

216. Roberts, E.H.; Ellis, R. Water and Seed Survival. *Ann. Bot.* **1989**, *63*, 39–39, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087727.

217. Afzal, I.; Bakhtavar, M.A.; Ishfaq, M.; Sagheer, M.; Baributsa, D. Maintaining dryness during storage contributes to higher maize seed quality. *J. Stored Prod. Res.* **2017**, *72*, 49–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.04.001

218. Bradford, K.J.; Dahal, P.; Van Asbrouck, J.; Kunusoth, K.; Bello, P.; Thompson, J.; Wu, F. The dry chain: Reducing postharvest losses and improving food safety in humid climates. *Trends Food Sci. Technol.* **2018**, *71*, 84–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.11.002.

219. De Vitis, M.; Hay, F.; Dickie, J.B.; Trivedi, C.; Choi, J.; Fiegener, R. Seed storage: Maintaining seed viability and vigor for restoration use. *Restor. Ecol.* **2020**, *28*, https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13174.

220. Ceccato, D.; Delatorre-Herrera, J.; Burrieza, H.; Bertero, D.; Martínez, E.; Delfino, I.; Moncada, S.; Bazile, D.; Castellión, M. Seed physiology and response to germination conditions. In *State of the Art Report on Quinoa around the World in 2013*; FAO: Santiago, Chile, 2015; pp. 131–142.

221. Ceccato, D.V.; Bertero, H.D.; Batlla, D. Environmental control of dormancy in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seeds: Two potential genetic resources for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. *Seed Sci. Res.* **2011**, *21*, 133–141, https://doi.org/10.1017/s096025851100002x.

222. McGinty, E.; Murphy, K.; Hauvermale, A. Seed Dormancy and Preharvest Sprouting in Quinoa (*Chenopodium quinoa* Willd). *Plants* **2021**, *10*, 458, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030458.
223. Ellis, R.H.; Hong, T.D.; Jackson, M.T. Seed Production Environment, Time of Harvest, and the Potential Longevity of Seeds of Three Cultivars of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). *Ann. Bot.* **1993**, *72*, 583–590, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1148.

224. Romero, G.; Heredia, A.; Chaparro-Zambrano, H.N. Germinative potential in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds stored under cool conditions. *Rev. UDCA Actual. Divulg. Cientif.* **2018**, *21*, 341–350, https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v21.n2.2018.1076.

225. Spehar, C.R.; Santos, R.L.D.B. Quinoa BRS Piabiru: Alternative for diversification of cropping systems. *Pesqui. Agropecuária Brasileira*. **2002**, *37*, 809–893, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2002000600020.

226. Castellión, M.; Matiacevich, S.; Buera, P.; Maldonado, S. Protein deterioration and longevity of quinoa seeds during long-term storage. *Food Chem.* **2010**, *121*, 952–958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.025.

227. Prego, I.; Maldonado, S.; Otegui, M. Seed Structure and Localization of Reserves in Chenopodium quinoa. *Ann. Bot.* **1998**, *82*, 481–488, https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0704.

228. Ng, S.-C.; Anderson, A.; Coker, J.; Ondrus, M. Characterization of lipid oxidation products in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). *Food Chem.* **2007**, *101*, 185–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.016.

229. Baributsa, D.; Njoroge, A. The use and profitability of hermetic technologies for grain storage among smallholder farmers in eastern Kenya. *J. Stored Prod. Res.* **2020**, *87*, 10168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101618.

230. Kiobia, D.; Silayo, V.; Mutabazi, K.; Graef, F.; Mourice, S. Performance of hermetic storage bags for maize grains under farmer-managed conditions: Good practice versus local reality. *J. Stored Prod. Res.* **2020**, *87*, 101586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101586.

231. Bakhtavar, M.A.; Afzal, I. Climate smart Dry Chain Technology for safe storage of quinoa seeds. *Sci. Rep.* **2020**, *10*, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69190-w.

232. de Jesus Souza F.I.; Devilla I.A.; de Souza R.T.; Teixeira I.R.; Spehar C.R. Physiological quality of quinoa seeds submitted to different storage conditions. *Afr. J. Agric. Res.* **2016**, *11*, 1299–1308, https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2016-10870.

233. Mammadi, A.; Afshari, R.T. Modeling of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seed viability with probit analysis. *Iran. J. Field Crop. Sci.* **2018**, *49*, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS-201605-654105.

234. Ellis, R.; Hong, T.D.; Roberts, E.H. A Low-Moisture-Content Limit to Logarithmic Relations Between Seed Moisture Content and Longevity. *Ann. Bot.* **1988**, *61*, 405–408, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087571.