# Investigating the impact of chilling temperature on male Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus survival

Nicole Culbert, Jérémie Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer

► To cite this version:

Nicole Culbert, Jérémie Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer. Investigating the impact of chilling temperature on male Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus survival. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14 (8), pp.e0221822. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221822. cirad-02341918

HAL Id: cirad-02341918

https://hal.science/cirad-02341918

Submitted on 25 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
RESEARCH ARTICLE

# Investigating the impact of chilling temperature on male *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* survival

Nicole J. Culbert<sup>1,2*</sup>, Jeremie R. L. Gilles<sup>1</sup>, Jérémy Bouyer<sup>1,3</sup>

1 Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/International Atomic Energy Agency Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria,

2 Institute of Integrative Biology & the Centre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, England, United Kingdom, 3 CIRAD, UMR ASTRE CIRAD-INRA « Animals, Health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystems », Campus international de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France

* nicole.j.culbert@gmail.com

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

## Abstract

In genetic control programmes, including the sterile insect technique (SIT), it is crucial to release insects of the highest quality with maximum survival. It is likely that male mosquitoes will follow the trend of other insectects in SIT programmes and be stored, transported and eventually released under chilled conditions. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of different chilling temperatures on male *Aedes aegypti* and Ae. albopictus survival by exposing them to a range of temperatures for different durations. Ae. aegypti were found to be less sensitive to the impact of chilling, with only 6°C causing a marginal decrease in survival in comparison to non-chilled controls. Conversely, Ae. albopictus displayed a significantly reduced survival at all chilling temperatures even when exposed for a short time. In both species, longer exposure to low temperatures reduced survival. Our results uncovered that Ae. albopictus are more sensitive to chilling, regardless of the temperature, when compared to Ae. aegypti. Such results indicate differences in thermal tolerances between species and the necessity of conducting experiments on a species by species basis when determining temperature limits for any insect destined for release as part of a genetic control programme.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

### OPEN ACCESS

**Citation:** Culbert NJ, Gilles JRL, Bouyer J (2019) Investigating the impact of chilling temperature on male *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* survival. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221822

**Editor:** Olle Terenius, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SWEDEN

**Received:** April 29, 2019

**Accepted:** August 15, 2019

**Published:** August 27, 2019

**Copyright:** © 2019 Culbert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Data Availability Statement:** All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

**Funding:** This work has been funded by the joint FAO/IAEA and by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 682387—REVOLINC) and the University of Liverpool cover the tuition fees of NJC under a bursary scheme. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

## Introduction

The global burden of vector-borne diseases is increasing with mosquito borne diseases responsible for more than 700,000 deaths each year [1]. With traditional vector control methods such as insecticides becoming less effective due to a build up of resistance in wild populations, alternative vector control tools are needed urgently [2]. Genetic control techniques such as the sterile insect technique (SIT) has seen reignited interest in recent years as a potential method to control mosquitoes as part of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) strategy, having been used successfully against various plant and animal pests for over six decades [3].
**Competing interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

**Abbreviations:** SIT, Sterile insect technique; RH, Relative humidity; IPCL, Insect Pest Control Laboratory; FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization; IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency; LD, light:dark.

Significant progress has been made in the last decade towards taking mosquito SIT to the operational level [4]. Mass rearing methodology has been developed and standardized, including larval rearing equipment [5, 6], larval diet [7] and more recently a rapid quality control device based on flight ability [8]. However, distinct gaps still remain in the literature, especially regarding the post-pupal irradiation stages or the handling, transport and release of sterile male mosquitoes. All of which are essential components of A SIT programme and, if not addressed correctly, could impact sterile male quality and survival [9]. Historically, the aerial release of sterile insects was carried out by deploying biodegradable release cartons filled with known quantities of insects which minimised the impact of handling and thus preserved quality [10]. Today, sterile insects such as fruit flies (*Ceratitis capitate*) and tsetse flies (*Glossina palpalis gambiensis*) are released via a new continuous release system, releasing the chilled adults at a defined rate per surface area [11]. During the transportation phase, prior to an aerial release, fruit flies and tsetse flies remain immobilised within a temperature range of 8 to 10°C [9, 12],

To ensure the success of any release campaign, it is essential to release insects with a maximal quality. As mosquitoes are small bodied poikilotherms, it comes as no surprise that temperature is consistently noted as a key element impacting survival [13]. The phenomenon of inducing immobilisation at a species-specific temperature is referred to as the critical thermal minimum (CT<sub>min</sub>) or knockdown temperature where the righting response is lost and the insect is unable to stand up or cling to a surface. This precedes a stage known as a chill-coma where a reversible cessation of movement occurs [14]. It has been shown that exposing insects to temperatures out of their normal range can cause stress and in turn reduces their quality and competitiveness [15]. Thus, it is fundamental to assess the effects of immobilizing male mosquitoes across an array of temperatures to define a suitable range within which any potential negative impact is mitigated. It is documented within the literature that activity will cease in *Aedes aegypti* at temperatures below 10°C [16, 17].

Previous studies conducted within our laboratory have already suggested a suitable temperature range in which to transport *Anopheles arabiensis* [18]. We endeavoured to build on this research and define an optimal temperature range for storing and transporting immobile male *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus*. We aimed to determine the temperature thresholds above which, immobilisation would not occur and below which reversible damage arises and thus impedes subsequent survival and quality. We exposed male *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* to a range of cold storage temperatures for various time periods and monitored their survival post-chilling.

## Materials and methods

### Mosquito colony sources and mass rearing procedures

The strains of *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* used in the present study were sourced from Juazeiro, Brazil and provided by Biofabrica Moscamed and Rimini, Italy and provided by the centro agricoltura ambiente (CAA) in Crevalcore, Italy respectively. Both *Ae. albopictus* and *Ae. aegypti* have been subsequently reared in the Food and Agricultural Organisation/ International Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/IAEA) Insect Pest Control Laboratory (IPCL) in Seibersdorf, Austria since 2010 and 2012 respectively without further colony regeneration.

Adults were maintained under controlled temperature, relative humidity and light regimes (27 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH, 12:12 h light:dark (L:D) photoperiod, with two one-hour twilight periods simulating dawn and dusk as described in [19]. Eggs used for all experiments were generated and hatched based upon standardised guidelines developed at the IPCL [20]. Larvae were mass-reared in a climate controlled room with temperature and RH held constant at
30 ± 1°C, 70 ± 10% RH, respectively. Larvae were reared in mass rearing trays with approximately 18,000 first instar (L₁) per tray in 5 l of deionized water. 7.5% IAEA diet was administered daily (50 ml on day 1, 100 ml on day 2, 150 ml on day 3, 200 ml on day 4 and 50 ml from day 5 onwards) [21]. Pupae were sexed mechanically using a Fay-Morlan [22] glass plate separator subsequently redesigned by Focks (John W. Hock Co., Gainesville, FL, USA [23]), prior to further examination under a stereomicroscope for further accuracy. Adults were maintained in small plastic Bugdorm cages (Bugdorm, Taipei, Taiwan; 15 x 15 x 15 cm) in batches of 30 males per cage with continuous access to a 10% sucrose solution. The experiment commenced on day 2 post-emergence.

## Determining the experimental temperature range

Short preliminary experiments were conducted to determine experimental temperatures. Bugdorms of 30 adult *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* were placed inside a climate chamber (Sanyo MLR-351H, Osaka, Japan) with a Hero4 GoPro camera for 20 min to test each temperature across the range of 2–14°C. As immobilisation did not occur above 12°C, a narrower range of 2–10°C was selected for further investigation. To monitor the temperature inside the climate chambers, Data loggers (Onset Hobo data loggers, Bourne, MA, USA) were placed inside.

## The impact of chilling temperature on survival

A Bugdorm containing 30 adult male *Ae. aegypti* (3 replicates for each temperature and duration) were maintained inside a climate chamber programmed to 4, 6, 8 or 10°C, RH 50%, for 1, 4, 8 or 24 h; control adults were maintained at 25 ± 1°C. Immediately after cold exposure, experimental males were returned to 25 ± 1°C. The experiment was repeated for *Ae. albopictus* but at 2, 4, 6 and 10°C. A slightly lower temperature (2°C) was selected for *Ae. albopictus* as we expected that they would be more tolerant to cold temperatures. Immediate mortality was assessed following immobilisation and survival monitored for a further 14 days, with dead adults removed daily. Survival was not monitored beyond 14 days as survival post-release is not likely to exceed this timeframe.

## Statistical analysis

Binomial linear mixed effect models were used to analyze the impact of the various temperatures and durations on survival rates on day 15 post-exposure (response variables). Temperature and duration were then used as fixed effects and the repetitions as random effects. The temperature of 25°C and the duration of one hour were set as reference levels (control) in all models and other treatments were compared to these values. The significance of fixed effects was tested using the likelihood ratio test [24, 25] and are reported in Tables 1 and 2.

## Results

### The effect of temperature and duration on male *Aedes* survival

In *Ae. aegypti*, temperature did not significantly reduce survival 15 days after immobilisation when exposed to all temperatures for one hour (Fig 1; Table 1, p > 0.05) except at 6°C where a marginally significant effect was observed (p = 0.05). With an increase in duration of chilling however, there was a subsequent decrease in survival at all temperatures (p < 10⁻³).

In *Ae. albopictus*, there was a significant decrease in survival 15 days after immobilisation at all temperatures to which they were exposed (2, 4, 6 and 10°C, Fig 2; Table 2, p < 0.03), with duration again further reducing survival with each increase in duration (p = 0.02). We therefore suggest that *Ae.aegypti* could be stored immobile between 7 and 10°C without negatively
<table><caption>Table 1. Fixed-effects coefficients of a mixed-effect binomial model of the impact of temperature and duration of the survival of male *Aedes aegypti* on day 15 post-exposure.</caption><thead><tr><td>Fixed effects</td><td>Value</td><td>Std. Error</td><td>z-value</td><td>p-value</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Intercept</td><td>3.55420</td><td>0.28728</td><td>12.372</td><td>2e-16</td></tr><tr><td>4°C</td><td>-0.52051</td><td>0.32859</td><td>-1.584</td><td>0.1132</td></tr><tr><td>6°C</td><td>-0.64037</td><td>0.32253</td><td>-1.986</td><td>0.0471</td></tr><tr><td>8°C</td><td>-0.18227</td><td>0.3494</td><td>-0.522</td><td>0.6019</td></tr><tr><td>10°C</td><td>-0.33936</td><td>0.33901</td><td>-1.001</td><td>0.3168</td></tr><tr><td>Duration</td><td>-0.04433</td><td>0.01007</td><td>-4.403</td><td>1.07e-05</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221822.t001

impacting their survival, at least for short durations, yet further testing is warranted for extended periods of immobilisation. We would be keen to repeat our experiments with *Ae. albopictus*, especially at the higher end of the immobilisation threshold (6–10°C) to see if our results hold true and if there are differences between strains.

Discussion

The results of our study show stark differences in survival post-chilling between *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus*. Our previous study highlighted that male *An. arabiensis* could be held at 2°C for up to 8 hours or between 4 and 10°C for up to 24 hours without significantly impacting subsequent survival 14 days after immobilisation, except a marginally significant reduction at 6°C which might be due to experimental uncertainties. This result is consistent with what was found in an earlier study where male *Ae. aegypti* were exposed to 0, 4, 8 and 10°C for a period of 2 hours with post-chilling survival monitored for a period of 15 days [8]. Only exposure to 0°C was found to significantly decrease survival whilst 4, 8 and 10°C did not as per our current study. The susceptibility of *Ae. albopictus* to all chilling temperatures is in stark contrast.

It is postulated that the expanding range of *Ae. albopictus* is attributed to its ability to survive at low temperatures whilst the more limited spread of *Ae. aegypti* is due to its inability to withstand colder conditions. This has been shown in larval survivorship in the 2 species exposed to low temperatures with *Ae. albopictus* displaying a higher survival that *Ae. aegypti* [26]. However, a review of the literature by Brady et al, also concluded that *Ae. aegypti* have a greater tolerance to lower temperatures when compared to *Ae. albopictus*, again in direct contrast to their observed geographic distribution [27]. This result may be explained when considering the egg stages of each species. The eggs of *Ae. albopictus* eggs are capable of undergoing diapause and thus allowing the species to overwinter [28]. On the other hand, *Ae. aegypti* eggs show far less adaptation to survive beyond their normal thermal limits [29]. Thus, there may be a stronger selection pressure in adults to withstand a wider temperature range to resist diurnal and inter-seasonal variations in temperature [27]. A further, more recent review by

<table><caption>Table 2. Fixed-effects coefficients of a mixed-effect binomial model of the impact of temperature and duration of the survival of male *Aedes albopictus* on day 15 post-exposure.</caption><thead><tr><td>Fixed effects</td><td>Value</td><td>Std. Error</td><td>z-value</td><td>p-value</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Intercept</td><td>2.924461</td><td>0.237463</td><td>12.315</td><td>2e-16</td></tr><tr><td>2°C</td><td>-0.838245</td><td>0.270320</td><td>-3.101</td><td>0.00193</td></tr><tr><td>4°C</td><td>-0.625690</td><td>0.278129</td><td>-2.250</td><td>0.02447</td></tr><tr><td>6°C</td><td>-0.625690</td><td>0.278129</td><td>-2.250</td><td>0.02447</td></tr><tr><td>10°C</td><td>-0.625690</td><td>0.278129</td><td>-2.250</td><td>0.02447</td></tr><tr><td>Duration</td><td>-0.019357</td><td>0.008331</td><td>-2.323</td><td>0.02015</td></tr></tbody></table>

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221822.t002
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>Fig 1. Mean (± standard error, SE) % survival of adult male *Aedes aegypti* 15 days following immobilisation at 4, 6, 8 and 10°C for 1, 4, 8 or 24 h.</figcaption></figure>

Mean values are represented by white circles with a black outline. Each series of grey dots represents a repetition (one cage. of 30 adult males).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221822.g001
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
**Fig 2.** Mean (± standard error, SE) % survival of adult male *Aedes albopictus* 15 days following immobilisation at 2, 6, 8 and 10°C for 1, 4, 8 or 24 h. Mean values are represented by white circles with a black outline. Each series of grey dots represents a repetition (one cage. of 30 adult males).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221822.g002

Schmidt et al, investigating the relationship between humidity and adult survival with temper-
ature as a modifying effect, concluded that the lowest mortality risk for *Ae. albopictus* and *Ae.
aegypti* was at 21.5 and 27.5°C respectively [30]. Despite the optimum temperature being
lower in *Ae. albopictus*, it was noted that *Ae. aegypti* had a survival advantage under most of
the tested conditions. Therefore, accounting for humidity may offer an explanation for the dif-
fering results reported in the reviews by Schmidt and Brady. Humidity also remained constant
during our studies and thus, it may be that *Ae. albopictus* may survive better when chilled at
lower temperatures if the level of humidity is adjusted. Further investigation is necessary. It is
also worth noting that both reviews were based upon adult female survival whilst our studies
only involved males.

Insects are well known to display a high level of variability when it comes to cold tolerance, both between and within species. This phenomenon has been reported in *Aphidiinae* [31] and *Trichogramma* species [32] with even inter-population variability in cold tolerance reported in the latter [33]. Cold tolerance can vary within one population due to epigenetic changes. This is especially true of *Ae. albopictus*, where a local short-term mechanism of the heritable trait of cold hardiness has been suggested for its successful spread into cooler climates [34]. It may be that the strain of *Ae. albopictus* we used for our study, which originated from Rimini, Italy, was less cold tolerance than other strains. The results from our studies concerning both *Ae. aegypti* and *Ae. albopictus* highlighted how determining conditions for one species does not mean it can be inferred for another. *Aedes* species appeared to be less tolerant to low temperatures, even for short durations than *An. arabiensis*, with *Ae. albopictus* displaying a greater sensitivity than *Ae. aegypti*. We would advise to maintain an immobilisation temperature of between 7 and 10°C when storage and transporting *Ae. aegypti* for short periods of time. With the recent development of our novel quality control tool [8], it may be of value to repeat these studies and follow up with flight ability tests to ascertain if chilling temperature is having a similar effect on their quality, especially in *Ae. albopictus*. Such a high natural variability between species therefore means that individual studies are necessary to determine species-specific parameters for storage and transportation for any insect and, most likely, any strain when considering them for release as part of a genetic control programme.

**Conclusions**

The results of our study highlight a variation in thermal tolerance between species and how
determining limits for one cannot be inferred for another. It is therefore necessary to conduct
such studies on a species by species basis in order to ensure that the quality of the insect des-
tined for release is of the highest quality.

**Supporting information**

S1 Appendix. Experimental data. All data used to generate the results for this study.
(XLSX)

**Author Contributions**

Conceptualization: Nicole J. Culbert, Jeremie R. L. Gilles.

Data curation: Nicole J. Culbert.
**Formal analysis:** Nicole J. Culbert, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Investigation:** Nicole J. Culbert.

**Methodology:** Nicole J. Culbert.

**Project administration:** Jeremie R. L. Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Supervision:** Jeremie R. L. Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Validation:** Nicole J. Culbert, Jeremie R. L. Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Visualization:** Nicole J. Culbert, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Writing – original draft:** Nicole J. Culbert, Jeremie R. L. Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer.

**Writing – review & editing:** Nicole J. Culbert, Jeremie R. L. Gilles, Jérémy Bouyer.

## References

1. WHO. Global vector control response 2017–2030. 2017.

2. Coetzee M, Koekemoer LL. Molecular systematics and insecticide resistance in the major African malaria vector *Anopheles funestus*. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013; 58:393–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153628 PMID: 23317045

3. Hendrichs JP, Robinson A. Sterile Insect Technique. In: Resh VH, Cardé RT, editors. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2009. p. 953–7.

4. McGraw EA, O'Neill SL. Beyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013; 11:181–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2968 PMID: 23411863

5. Balestrino F, Benedict MQ, Gilles JR. A new larval tray and rack system for improved mosquito mass rearing. J Med Entomol. 2012; 49:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1603/me11188 PMID: 22679867

6. Balestrino F, Puggioli A, Bellini R, Petric D, Gilles JRL. Mass production cage for *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2014; 51:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1603/me13130 PMID: 24605465

7. Zheng M. L., Zhang D. J., Damiens D. D., Yamada H. & Gilles J. R. L. Standard operating procedures for standardized mass rearing of the dengue and chikungunya vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)—I—Egg quantification. Parasit. Vectors. 2015; 8:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0631-2 PMID: 25614052

8. Culbert N, Balestrino F, Dor A, Herranz GS, Yamada H, Wallner T, et al. A rapid quality control test to foster the development of genetic control in mosquitoes. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8:16179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34469-6 PMID: 30385841

9. Pagabeleguem S, Seck MT, Sall B, Vreysen MJB, Gimonneau G, Fall AG, et al. Long distance transport of irradiated male *Glossina palpalis gambiaensis* pupae and its impact on sterile male yield. Parasit Vectors. 2015; 8:259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0869-3 PMID: 25927610

10. Bjelis M, Radunic D & Bulic P. Pre- and post-release quality of sterile *Ceratitis capitata* males released by an improved automated ground release machine. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2013; 137:154–162.

11. Mubarqui RL, Perez RC, Kladt RA, Lopez JL, Parker A, Seck MT, et al. The smart aerial release machine, a universal system for applying the sterile insect technique. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e103077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103077 PMID: 25036274

12. Enkerlin W (2007) Guidance for Packing, Shipping, Holding and Release of Sterile Flies in Area-Wide Fruit Fly Control Programmes. FAO of the UN, Rome, Italy.

13. Alto BW, Bettinardi D. Temperature and dengue virus infection in mosquitoes: independent effects on the immature and adult stages. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013; 88(3):497–505. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0421 PMID: 23382163

14. Semper C. The Natural Conditions of Existence as They Affect Animal Life. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Co. 1883.

15. Neven LG, Hansen LD. Effects of temperature and controlled atmospheres on codling moth metabolism. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2010; 103:418–23.

16. Christophers SR. Aedes aegypti (L.) the Yellow Fever Mosquito. Cambridge University Press; London, UK: 1960.
17. Reinhold JM, Lazzari CR, Lahondère C. Effects of the Environmental Temperature on *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* Mosquitoes: A Review. Insects. 2018; 9(4):158.

18. Culbert NJ, Lees RS, Vreysen MJ, Darby AC, Gilles JR. Optimised conditions for handling and transport of male *Anopheles arabiensis*: effects of low temperature, compaction, and ventilation on male quality. *Entomol Exp Appl.* 2017; 164:276-83.

19. Zheng ML, Zhang DJ, Damiens DD, Yamada H, Gilles JRL. Standard operating procedures for standardized mass rearing of the dengue and chikungunya vectors *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae)—I—Egg quantification. *ParasitVectors*. 2015; 8:42.

20. Guidelines for routine colony maintenance of Aedes mosquito species—Version 1.0 [Internet]. 2017 Dec. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/resources/manual/guidelines-for-routine-colony-maintenance-of-aedes-mosquito-species-version-10

21. Balestrino F, Puggioli A, Gilles J, Bellini R. Validation of a new larval rearing unit for *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae) mass rearing. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e91914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091914 PMID: 24647347

22. Fay RW, Morlan HB. A mechanical device for separating the developmental stages, sexes and species of mosquitoes. Mosq News. 1959; 19:144-7.

23. Focks DA. An improved separator for the developmental stages, sexes, and species of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1980; 17:567-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/17.6.567 PMID: 6111610

24. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media; 2003.

25. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. Model selection for extended quasi-likelihood models in small samples. Bio-metrics. 1995;1077-1084. PMID: 7548692

26. Chang LH, Hsu EL, Teng HJ, Ho CM. Differential survival of *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae exposed to low temperatures in Taiwan. J. Med. Entomol. 2007; 44:205210.

27. Brady OJ, Johansson MA, Guerra CA, Bhatt S, Golding N Pigott DM, et al. Modelling adults *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* survival at different temperatures in laboratory and field settings. Parasit Vectors. 2013; 6:351. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-351 PMID: 24330720

28. Hanson SM, Craig GB: Relationship between cold hardiness and supercooling point in *Aedes albopictus* eggs. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1995; 11(1):35-38. PMID: 7616187

29. Fischer S, Alem IS, De Majo MS, Campos RE, Schweigmann N. Cold season mortality and hatching behavior of *Aedes aegypti* L. (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs in Buenos Aires City, Argentina. J Vector Ecol. 2011; 36 (1):94-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00145.x PMID: 21635646

30. Schmidt CA, Comeau G, Monaghan AJ, Williamson DJ, Ernst KC. Effects of desiccation stress on adult female longevity in *Aedes aegypti* and Ae. albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae): results of a systematic review and pooled survival analysis. *Parasit Vectors*. 2018; 11:267 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2808-6 PMID: 29695282

31. Colinet H, Hance T. Interspecific variation in the response to low temperature storage in different aphid parasitoids. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010; 156: 147-156.

32. Kumar P, Shenhmar M, Brar KS. Effect of low temperature storage on the efficiency of three species of Trichogrammatids. J Biol Cont. 2005; 19:17-21.

33. Khosas SS, Brar KS. Effect of storage on the emergence and parasitization efficiency of laboratory and field collected populations of *Trichogramma chilonis* Ishii. J Biol Cont. 2000; 14(2):71-74.

34. Kreß A, Oppold AM, Kuch U, Oehlmann J, Müller R. Cold tolerance of the Asian tiger mosquito *Aedes albopictus* and its response to epigenetic alterations. J Insect Physiol. 2017; 9:113-21.