# Monitoring of clinical strains and environmental fungal aerocontamination to prevent invasive aspergillosis infections in hospital during large deconstruction work: a protocol study

Sophie Tiphaine Loeffert, Elise Melloul, Cédric Dananché, Laetitia Hénaff, Thomas Bénet, Pierre Cassier, Damien Dupont, Jacques Guillot, Françoise Botterel, Martine Wallon, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Sophie Tiphaine Loeffert, Elise Melloul, Cédric Dananché, Laetitia Hénaff, Thomas Bénet, et al. Monitoring of clinical strains and environmental fungal aerocontamination to prevent invasive aspergillosis infections in hospital during large deconstruction work: a protocol study. BMJ Open, 2017, 7 (11), pp.e018109. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018109. hal-01911524

HAL Id: hal-01911524

https://hal.science/hal-01911524v1

Submitted on 18 Nov 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
# BMJ Open Monitoring of clinical strains and environmental fungal aerocontamination to prevent invasive aspergillosis infections in hospital during large deconstruction work: a protocol study

Sophie Tiphaine Loeffert,¹ Elise Melloul,² Cédric Dananché,¹,³ Laetitia Hénaff,¹ Thomas Bénet,¹,³ Pierre Cassier,⁴ Damien Dupont,⁵ Jacques Guillot,² Françoise Botterel,² Martine Wallon,⁵ Marie-Paule Gustin,¹,⁶ Philippe Vanhems¹,³

**To cite:** Loeffert ST, Melloul E, Dananché C, et al. Monitoring of clinical strains and environmental fungal aerocontamination to prevent invasive aspergillosis infections in hospital during large deconstruction work: a protocol study. *BMJ Open* 2017;7:e018109. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018109

► Prepublication history for this paper is available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018109).

Received 6 June 2017
Revised 27 September 2017
Accepted 28 September 2017

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

For numbered affiliations see end of article.

**Correspondence to**
Sophie Tiphaine Loeffert;
sophie.loeffert01@chu-lyon.fr

## ABSTRACT

**Introduction** Monitoring fungal aerocontamination is an essential measure to prevent severe invasive aspergillosis (IA) infections in hospitals. One central block among 32 blocks of Edouard Herriot Hospital (EHH) was entirely demolished in 2015, while care activities continued in surrounding blocks. The main objective was to undertake broad environmental monitoring and clinical surveillance of IA cases to document fungal dispersion during major deconstruction work and to assess clinical risk.

**Methods and analysis** A daily environmental survey of fungal loads was conducted in eight wards located near the demolition site. Air was collected inside and outside selected wards by agar impact samplers. Daily spore concentrations were monitored continuously by volumetric samplers at a flow rate of 10 L.min⁻¹. Daily temperature, wind direction and speed as well as relative humidity were recorded by the French meteorological station Meteoociel. *Aspergillus fumigatus* strains stored will be genotyped by multiple-locus, variable-number, tandem-repeat analysis. Antifungal susceptibility will be assessed by E-test strips on Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium supplemented with agar. Ascertaining the adequacy of current environmental monitoring techniques in hospital is of growing importance, considering the rising impact of fungal infections and of curative antifungal costs. The present study could improve the daily management of IA risk during major deconstruction work and generate new data to ameliorate and redefine current guidelines.

**Ethics and dissemination** This study was approved by the clinical research and ethics committees of EHH.

## INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal infections are major threats to immunocompromised patients because of their high incidence and related mortality.¹ They occur through inhalation of airborne conidia with various consequences, such as

## Strengths and limitations of this study

► This study is one of the largest ongoing prospective studies to evaluate combined approach of environmental and clinical monitoring in hospital during major deconstruction works.

► The high frequency and number of samples collected in this study during deconstruction works will allow powerful statistical analysis to evaluate the efficiency of protective measures and reduce fungal contamination.

► Non-cultivable methods monitoring outdoor *Aspergillus* aerocontamination for hospital alerts are evaluated.

► Genetic diversity and their antifungal susceptibility profiles of clinical and environmental collected isolates are determined to give complete information on *Aspergillus* spp. dispersion and hopefully give new insights into improvement of environmental monitoring and of hospital guidelines during major demolition work.

► Microbiological identification will focus only on *Aspergillus* spp. because it is the leading pathogen responsible for invasive aspergillosis. Although two air sampling collectors were used in the study, no particle counter was tested.

immune-allergic reactions to invasive aspergillosis (IA), a severe opportunistic disease caused mostly by *Aspergillus fumigatus* (>80%) and, to a lesser extent, by *A. flavus*, *A. niger*, *A. terreus* and *A. nidulans*.² ³ IA is a very serious condition, with crude lethality ranging from 50% to 90% and greater mortality in haematological patients.⁴ ⁵ Its epidemiology has changed in recent years, surfacing in non-haematological units, such as intensive care units (ICUs) and increasing in non-neutropenic
hosts treated with corticosteroids or lifelong immunosup-
pressants.⁶ The burden of patients at risk of IA is growing
every year because of longer survival and improved
care.⁷ Azole antifungals are commonly given to combat
IA in many countries, with recent studies reporting an
emerging, worldwide problem: azole drug resistance of
*A. fumigatus* isolates.⁸⁻¹³

Aspergillus species are opportunistic pathogens widely distributed in the environment and easily transported by air because of their conidia size.¹³ Construction work in healthcare settings in past decades has been associated with major IA outbreaks.⁴ Construction involving periods of renovation or deconstruction increases spore release, creating high-risk situations in hospitals.¹ ¹⁴ ¹⁵ In the 1980s, 22 IA cases arose over a 30-month period during building renovations at Edouard Herriot Hospital (EHH) (Lyon, France).¹⁶ A quasi-experimental study, conducted in an adult haematology unit of this hospital, underlined the need for monitoring environmental factors to prevent nosocomial IA.¹⁷ A sampling strategy for fungal monitoring in hospital was based on study results.¹⁴ ¹⁸

Recently, an entire block in EHH underwent decon-
struction without suspension of care activities in direct
proximity to it. The situation prompted the infection
control team to monitor fungal dispersion and look for
cases of *Aspergillus* disease. Only a few studies have been
performed in this context and under similar conditions
so that sampling strategies and analyses differ, indicating
varying fungal loads.¹⁵⁻²¹ All these investigations have
highlighted the common need for innovative approaches
and tools to improve research in the field.¹⁸ Real-time
methods may provide warning systems by monitoring
outdoor fungal loads.²¹

The purpose of the present work was to carry out broad
environmental monitoring and clinical surveillance of
IA cases to better understand fungal dispersion during
major deconstruction work.

METHODS

Study objectives

The objective of this study is to provide new data for
future guidelines on adequate management of invasive
fungal infection risk in hospital during major deconstruc-
tion work. Its intermediate objectives are to: (1) evaluate
non-cultivable methods monitoring outdoor *Aspergillus*
aerocontamination for hospital alerts, (2) assess the
impact of meteorological parameters (MP) on *Aspergillus*
aerocontamination and (3) compare the genetic diversity
of clinical and environmental *A. fumigatus* isolates and
ascertain their antifungal susceptibility profiles.

STUDY SITE

Built in the 1930s in Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France, on a 0.15-
m² site, EHH is a university-affiliated hospital composed
of 32 independent blocks divided by tree-planted
walkways and grassy areas. This 850-adult bed tertiary

institution provides care to a large panel of immunocom-
promised patients (solid organ transplantation, haema-
topoietic stem cell transplantation, immunosuppressive
treatment, ICU). The central block that was demolished
measured 0.006-km², representing approximately 12.2%
of the area covered by hospital blocks (figure 1, online
video of demolition works: https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=Oa7xRufAnhQ). Three deconstruction periods
at EHH were scheduled between February and December
2015. The first period, between February and June 2015,
consisted of gutting the building and removing asbestos
from it. The floors were removed in July and August 2015.
Excavation and earthwork took place between September
and December 2015. Finally, concrete was poured at the
end of December 2015 to allow construction of the new
building comprising fully equipped areas (operating
rooms, ICUs and heliport) on 2.5 ha.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was conducted in eight medical wards located
around the demolition site: four ICUs, one kidney and
pancreas transplantation unit and three medical wards
(figure 2). All of them were possibly occupied by at-risk
patients. It should be noted that EHH does not have a
haematological ward any longer. In a 10-month period,
about eight inside and four outside air samples were
collected from each unit per week (table 1). Approx-
imately 64 indoor and 48 outdoor air samples were
obtained per week, for a total of 3885 air samples. Weekly
clinical monitoring of high-risk, hospitalised patients, by
infectious control practitioners, was scheduled.

PROTECTIVE MEASURES

Several preventive measures were performed: (1) doors and windows in front of the deconstruction site were maintained closed during the day and allowed for opening at night, (2) patient and medical staff movements were limited and special traffic patterns were designed, (3) masks were requested for hospitalised or non-hospitalised immunocompromised patients outside wards to limit fungal exposure, (4) adhesive decontamination carpets were installed at the entry of wards and (5) visitors, patients and medical staff were alerted about fungal exposure due to the deconstruction site. In case of high fungal exposure, after results of environmental survey, intensive biocleaning was performed.

Preventive measures were also implemented outdoor,
at the deconstruction site to limit fungal dispersion.
Construction site teams received information and educa-
tion about IA risks. Humid environment was manda-
tory for all works completed by regular humidification.
Furthermore, rubbles of ruined buildings are humidi-
fied and covered for evacuation. Circulation pattern for
rubble evacuation is also designed. Damp cleaning of
deconstruction site roads are frequently realised with, in
addition, cleaning of truck wheels.
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** Location of Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon (France).</figcaption></figure>

## ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY

The environmental survey consisted of monitoring air samples inside and outside selected wards (two blocks were monitored per day). Only moulds, in particular *Aspergillus* spp have been investigated in this study.

### Sampling by the non-cultivable method

Outdoor airborne fungal spore concentrations were monitored continuously with 7-day Hirst-type spore traps (VPPS 2000; Lanzoni, Bologna, Italy) at a flow rate of 10 L/min. Air drawn in by suction port was directly impacted on adhesive tape cut daily into segments.

Mean daily fungal spore concentrations were assessed for each segment by optical microscopy (Axiostar; Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Spore counts were expressed as spores/m³/day. The Hirst-type spore trap was placed on the rooftop of a block extension consisting of a prefabricated floor located on the north side, just in front of the deconstruction site. It allowed daily monitoring of spore concentrations as total fungal load and *Aspergillaceae* fungal load (ie, *Aspergillus* spp + *Penicillium* spp). A similar Hirst-type spore trap was placed throughout the study in the Gerland area (Lyon, France), located a few kilometre south-west of EHH and served as negative control.

### Sampling by the cultivable method

Air samples were collected two times a day outside and inside wards during 11 months, according to a standardised protocol (table 1). Each sample was gathered by agar impact sampler (Air Ideal; bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes containing Sabouraud chloramphenicol agar. Air intake velocity of this agar impact sampler was 100 L/min. Two plates were seeded at each sample site. Air sample volume was chosen according to French guidelines environmental fungal risk control.²² ²³ They recommend a sample volume adapted to the presumed levels of contamination in the environment. Due to the major demolition works ongoing, outdoor air was considered more contaminated by fungi than indoor. So in order to avoid overcrowding on the plates, outdoor plates were seeded for only 1 min corresponding to an air volume of 100 L. Indoor samples were supposed to have an intermediate fungal contamination level due to the preventive measures applied to reduce environmental contamination inside units. Therefore, indoor plates were seeded for 2½ min, resulting in a higher air volume (250 L). One of these plates was incubated for 48 hours at 37°C to grow thermotolerant *A. fumigatus* species.²⁴ The other plate was incubated
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2** Detailed map of Edouard Herriot Hospital and sampling sites of environmental monitoring.</figcaption></figure>

for 5 days at 30°C to allow growth of all fungi. Colonies were then counted and identified at the genus level on the basis of macroscopic and microscopic characteristics (lactophenol blue-stained preparations). The data are expressed as colony-forming units per cubic metre.

## Prospective clinical survey

### Patient inclusion

All hospitalised patients were surveyed prospectively at the hospital level and were eligible for inclusion. IA was classified as proven, probable and possible or excluded according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group (EORTC) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) criteria.²⁵ Only cases diagnosed after hospital admission were included. Cases were categorised into three groups, according to the time between hospital admission and diagnosis: community-acquired, undetermined and nosocomial. Community-acquired cases were defined as incident cases imported from outside the hospital with apportion of clinical symptoms or positive sample in less than 2 days after admission. Undetermined cases were defined as incident cases with lag time ranging from 1 to 9 days between admission and the first IA signs without any previous negative sample. Probable nosocomial cases were defined as incident IA with lag

time between admission and symptoms onset of at least 10 days, or if there is some history of negative sample. Clinical manifestations of IA vary widely and may develop in different clinical scenarios.²⁶⁻²⁸

## Case detection

Case detection was based on prospective surveillance of:

* Antifungal therapies (eg, voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin and amphotericin B distributed by the hospital pharmacy) administered to patients by pharmacy informatics software.

* Mycological results positive for *Aspergillus* spp corresponding to cultures showing colony of *A. fumigatus* were investigated.

* Reporting of suspected cases by hospital clinicians and infection control practitioners.

All suspected cases were investigated by two infection control practitioners (one resident and one physician). External validation was requested in case of uncertain diagnosis by standardised chart, allowing the collection of demographic characteristics, disease history, clinical features, mycological, biological and radiological data, antifungal therapy and disease outcome. If an increased incidence of IA was detected, infections control specialists and mycologists would be solicited to review IA cases.
<table><caption>Table 1 Description of manual air sampling sites monitored at Edouard Herriot Hospital</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Medical unit</th><th colspan="3">ICU</th><th colspan="3">Medical unit</th><th colspan="3">Kidney and pancreas transplantation unit</th><th colspan="3">ICU</th><th colspan="3">ICU</th></tr><tr><th>Sampling</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th><th>Morning</th><th>Afternoon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">Monday</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td>Indoor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Tuesday</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td>Indoor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Wednesday</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td>Indoor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Thursday</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td>Indoor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Room+ corridor</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr><tr><td>Friday</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Building porch</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td><td>Corridor+ treatment room</td></tr></tbody></table>

ICU, intensive care unit.
### A. fumigatus collection

During the study, a maximum of four *A. fumigatus* colonies per day among all *A. fumigatus* environmental cultures incubated at 37°C were arbitrarily isolated, subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar and incubated at 45°C in order to select *A. fumigatus* before being frozen. All *A. fumigatus* clinical isolates of interest also were frozen at -20°C. In total, 400 *A. fumigatus* isolates, corresponding to maximal laboratory capacity and budget, were constituted arbitrarily.

### Molecular identification of Aspergillus isolates

All *A. fumigatus* isolates stored will be identified retrospectively at the species level by sequencing β-tubulin gene (*benA*, using Bt2a/BT2b primers). Isolates will be subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose chloramphenicol agar for 48 hours at 37°C. A piece of approximately 1 cm² of culture will be cut and transferred to microtubes for DNA extraction with QIAamp DNA blood mini kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All isolates will be identified by partial sequencing of β-tubulin gene (*benA*, using Bt2a/BT2b primers). Sequence alignments will be analysed by Chromas Lite, V.2.01 (http://technelysium.com.au) and compared with genome sequences in GenBank and MycoBank. The results will be considered acceptable if homologies with other entries in the databases used for comparison are >99%.

### Genotyping of A. fumigatus isolates

Isolates will be genotyped by multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) based on

selected variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) polymorphism. The MLVA protocol for *A. fumigatus* genotyping targeting 10 markers will be adapted from Thierry *et al* for multiplexing and capillary electrophoresis (CE).²⁹ One primer couple will be modified to provide shorter amplicons while ensuring the absence of overlaps across VNTR loci. Primers targeting new VNTR flanking regions have been designed by Primer3Plus software. MLVA primers for 10 loci and the fluorescent dyes in CE are enumerated in table 2. MLVA PCRs were performed in two multiplexes in a final volume of 50 µL containing: 1–5 ng of DNA, 1X Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) and 0.2 µM of each flanking primer. The initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min was followed by 35 cycles, consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 58°C for 40 s and elongation at 72°C for 10 min. The final extension step was set at 60°C for 10 min. PCR products were diluted 1:50 in deionised water, and 1 µL of the diluted sample was added to 18.5 µL formamide and 0.1 µL of GeneScan 500 LIZ dye size standard (ThermoFisher; Life Technologies, Courtaboeuf, France). All samples were denatured for 5 min at 95°C, then cooled to 4°C before being subjected to CE in a 3130 XL DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France) with 3130 POP7 polymer (Applied Biosystems). Each VNTR locus was identified by colour and size in electropherograms by GeneScan analysis (Applied Biosystems). Fragment sizes were converted to repeat numbers based on the formula: number of repeats (bp)=fragment size (bp)—flanking

<table><caption>Table 2 MLVA primers and fluorescence dyes used in each multiplex reaction</caption><thead><tr><th></th><th>VNTR</th><th>Fluorochromes</th><th>Primer sequences (5'-3')</th><th>Allele size range (bp)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5">Multiplex 1<br>CE 1</td><td rowspan="2">Asp 167</td><td>F:</td><td>ATTO565-</td><td>TGAGATGGTTAACTTACGTAGCGC</td><td rowspan="2">374-422</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td></td><td>CGCTCCCACCGTTACCAAC</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 330</td><td>F:</td><td>ATTO550-</td><td>ATCTGGTCGCGAAATTCCTCT</td><td rowspan="2">152-218</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td></td><td>TCTTCGGCCTTTTCATCCC</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 345</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">Yakima Yellow-</td><td>TCTCCAACCCTTCGGACG</td><td rowspan="2">191-246</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>GCCGGAAGAGCATGAAGACA</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 443</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">ATTO565-</td><td>AAGCTTCGTCTGGCGAAGAG</td><td rowspan="2">154-280</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>GCACGTGTACGGTGTTCCTG</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 446</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">6-FAM-</td><td>CGATCATGTTTGCTTGAGGA</td><td rowspan="2">197-260</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>CCGACAGCATCGAGCAACTA</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Multiplex 2<br>CE 2</td><td rowspan="2">Asp 20</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">6-FAM-</td><td>GGGAAGAGAGGAACCGATCC</td><td rowspan="2">182-222</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>CGCAGTGGGCAGTTTGAAT</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 165</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">Yakima Yellow-</td><td>TGATGGGCCGCAGTCG</td><td rowspan="2">154-214</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>GCACCTGCTTGTCGATTCGT</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 202</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">ATTO565-</td><td>AGGATCACTGCCCTCAACCC</td><td rowspan="2">200-296</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>CCGAAATCCGCGGGA</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 204bis</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">ATTO565-</td><td>ATTGGGAAGAGACGGGGTAT</td><td rowspan="2">134-178</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>GTCCTCACTTTTGCCTTGGT</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Asp 252</td><td>F:</td><td rowspan="2">ATTO550-</td><td>CAGATTGGAGACACGAAGCG</td><td rowspan="2">176-224</td></tr><tr><td>R:</td><td>ACCACGGATTGCCAAGGA</td></tr></tbody></table>

6-FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein; CE, capillary electrophoresis; F, forward; MLVA, multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis; R, reverse; VNTR, variable-number tandem repeat.
regions (bp)/repeat size (bp). Absent PCR products were designated an allele number, for example, '-1'. Phylogenetic relationships between isolates will be studied, generating a minimum spanning tree with PHYLOViZ V.2.0.³⁰

## Antifungal susceptibility testing

Briefly, the antifungal susceptibility of stored *A. fumigatus* isolates to itraconazole, voriconazole and amphotericin B will be analysed by Etest on RPMI medium supplemented with 2% glucose, according to the manufacturer's instructions. A conidial suspension adjusted at 0.5 McFarland will be inoculated on RPMI 1640 agar plates (bioMérieux). Etest strips (bioMérieux) will then be applied, and the plates incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and will be tested after 24 hours and 48 hours incubation, respectively, depending on growth rate.³¹ They will be estimated visually as no-growth endpoints, where the edge of the inhibition ellipse intersects the side of the Etest strips.

## METEOROLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE

Meteorological conditions monitored were temperature (degree celsius), relative humidity (percentage), wind direction and speed (kilometre per hour). They were recorded every 2 hours by Meteociel, the French regional meteorological station at Bron, 5 km from EHH (figure 1).

## DATA ANALYSIS

### Data quality control

Location of and information on sampling sites were recorded on paper and electronic database. To avoid typing errors, a computer model was created to clean up the electronic database. Every detected error was discussed by the infection control team and screened to assess its reliability. *A. fumigatus* isolates stored for data collection were correctly identified in a strain bank. Antifungal treatments, delivered by the hospital pharmacy, and microbiological data were extracted every week from infection control practitioners. Deconstruction work meetings involving clinicians, infection control practitioners and engineers, held every month, to ensure conformity with and respect of French deconstruction work guidelines.

### Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, such as means, SD (or medians and quartiles), numbers and percentages, have been obtained for indoor and outdoor fungal loads. Incidence rates will be calculated as the ratio of detected IA cases over the population at risk during the study period. Generalised linear models (appropriate for outcomes) will examine correlations between MPs and fungal contamination. To compare results obtained with cultivable and non-cultivable methods, Pearson correlation coefficients

or Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (r) will be applied according to data normality. Time series, by the non-cultivable method, autocorrelation and cross-correlation across sites (EHH and Gerland), including meteorological factors at different time scales and time lag, will be studied. P<0.05 values will be considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses will be performed with R language (V.3.0.2).

## DISCUSSION

Clinical and environmental monitoring was reinforced during deconstruction work, according to standard French recommendations.³² No specific prophylaxis strategy was implemented at our hospital for immunocompromised patients. Only patients with acute leukaemia were susceptible to received prophylaxis therapy according to their condition. Outdoor and indoor environmental monitoring of contamination was implemented at EHH to prevent high-risk airborne fungal situations.

The present study addresses several questions. Its main objective is to detect clinical cases as soon as possible to adequately manage invasive fungal infection risk in hospital during major deconstruction work and report new findings for future guidelines. Are national recommendations on protective measures in high-risk units efficient in shielding patients from *A. fumigatus* aero-contamination? Totally, 3885 air samples were collected between 23 February 2015 and 17 December 2015. Air specimens, assessed by the cultivable method, were grouped into 2141 indoor and 1744 outdoor samples. A total of 296 days of recording were undertaken with the non-cultivable method. The high frequency and number of samples collected in this study during the three deconstruction periods will allow powerful statistical analysis to evaluate the efficiency of protective measures and reduce fungal contamination.

One of its objectives is to scrutinise the performance of non-cultivable methods of outdoor *Aspergillus* aero-contamination monitoring, such as Hirst-type spore traps, and to ascertain the impact of MP on *Aspergillus* aero-contamination. One preliminary study demonstrated potential interest in monitoring outdoor contamination.²¹ Complete data on airborne fungal concentration will be analysed by cultivable and non-cultivable sampling methods.³³ ³⁴ Non-cultivable methods allow the sampling of numerous spores, useful to carry out surveys but have limitation in fungal spore's identification only possible at the genus level.³⁵ Cultivable method can identify spores at the species level but is time-consuming and depends on the substrate plated and culture condition applied.³⁶ Cultivable methods generally allow the identification at the species level. Cultivable method is required to perform genotyping and evaluation of antifungal susceptibility of the isolates. Cultivable and non-cultivable methods will be compared, which results could improve current prevention guidelines by providing early warning systems to hospitals.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3** Flow chart of protocol study.</figcaption></figure>

Part of the study analysis evaluated the impact of MP on airborne fungal contamination. The relationship between MPs and fungal spore concentrations has already been scrutinised.³⁷ ³⁸ However, no study has investigated the role of meteorological factors in outdoor and indoor air contamination during construction works. A better understanding of MP impact on airborne fungi is needed to see if it could help to assess high-risk situations during construction work in hospital.

In addition, the present study compares the genetic diversity of clinical and environmental *A. fumigatus* isolates and profiles their antifungal susceptibility patterns. The aim is to describe *A. fumigatus* diversity over deconstruction periods along with genetic correlations between environmental and clinical strains collected. Correlation between environmental contamination and the occurrence of IA is hardly ever established due to limitations of both environmental sampling and genotyping.³⁹ ⁴⁰ Only a few authors have demonstrated links between clinical and environmental genotypes, and only a small number of environmental strains were included in the analysis, limiting the possibility of finding matches.⁴¹ ⁴²

The present work provides considerable data on potential IA outbreaks and determines genetic patterns among *A. fumigatus* isolates (figure 3). Principally two methods of genotyping have emerged for study of medically important fungi: multilocus sequence typing and method bases on short tandem repeats.⁴³ Comparison of several *A. fumigatus* typing techniques has suggested

that methods based on short tandem repeats combine high discriminatory power, unambiguous interpretation and significant interlaboratory reproducibility.⁴⁴ ⁴⁵ MLVA based on 10 VNTR markers will be tested in this study: it has already permitted to evaluate *A. fumigatus* dispersion and diversity in the environment.²⁹ The MLVA-10 protocol normally employs singleplex PCRs and agarose gel electrophoresis (AE).²⁹ While traditional AE is relatively cheap, it is also time-consuming. In this study, a multiplex PCR system with multicolour CE for the MLVA-10 panel was designed and provided 97% typeability of isolates, good reproducibility and high discriminatory power. The main advantage of this new MLVA is the high throughput that is facilitated by multiplex PCR and CE.

The present study evaluates the antifungal susceptibility pattern of environmental and clinical isolates collected. The past decade has seen worldwide reports of azole drug resistance, with prevalence depending on country.¹¹ ⁴⁶⁻⁴⁸ Recently, Choukri *et al*¹² observed that the overall prevalence of azole resistance in France was about 1.8% in unselected clinical *A. fumigatus* isolates. Resistance has also been encountered in the environment, but possible linkage between clinical resistance and environmental usage of azole fungicides is still unclear.⁴⁹ ⁵⁰ Environmental acquisition and dispersion of resistance have been reinforced by IA attributed to azole-resistant *A. fumigatus* isolates in patients who have never ever been subjected to azole therapy.⁵¹ Determination of the prevalence of azole
resistance may contribute to better management of IA cases.

Azole resistance and genetic patterns can provide exper-
imental data to evaluate correlations between clinical and
environmental isolates and clearly understand *A. fumigatus* dispersion during large demolition programme.

This work had some limitations. Adjustment of MP
could change the data analysis and conclusions. As
IA incubation time is unknown or variable, ranging
from a few days to 3 months, its diagnosis may involve
some bias.⁵²⁻⁵⁶ Precise definition by EORTC/MSG was
respected to identify IA cases and reduce misclassifica-
tion.²⁵ This protocol could not be implemented during
a baseline period before construction work began.
Microbiological identification will focus only on *Asper-
gillus* spp because it is the leading pathogen responsible
for IA.<fnref n="3" /> To improve study outcomes, data on airborne
fungal colonisation in hospital need to be analysed in
association with indoor air-handling systems. Although
two air sampling collectors were used in the study, no
particle counter was tested. Klassen *et al* have under-
lined the existence of possible genetic differentiation
and variable recombination rates of *A. fumigatus* which
could prevent correct analysis of genotyping result.⁵⁷

A combined approach could deliver meaningful conclusions on *Aspergillus* spp dispersion and hopefully give new insights into improvement of environmental monitoring and of hospital guidelines during major demolition work. This study fits in with larger, ongoing exposome research based on increased knowledge of connections between environmental exposure and health.⁵⁸

Author affiliations

**Acknowledgements** The authors thank all hospital department chiefs for study participation. They also thank the EA 7380 Dynamyc Team from Université Paris Est, France, the Mycology and Parasitology Institute of Lyon and Analyzair Society, Lyon, France, for providing invaluable advice. PhD salary support of the first author by Laboratoires ANIOS is acknowledged.

**Contributors** STL, EM, CD, LH and TB acquired the original data for this study. STL, EM, CD, TB, JG, JB, M-PG and PV formulated study methodology. STL, EM, M-PG and PV designed the protocol. CD, TB, PC, DD and MW helped with manuscript writing and language review. All authors contributed to revisions and approved the final manuscript version.

**Funding** This study was supported by Laboratoires ANIOS and the Department of Environment and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Lyon, France, and Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for the author STL but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

**Competing interests** All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and vouch that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere.

**Provenance and peer review** Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

**Open Access** This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

REFERENCES

1. Denning DW. Invasive aspergillosis. *Clin Infect Dis* 1998;26:781-803.

2. Marr KA, Patterson T, Denning D. Aspergillosis. Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and therapy. *Infect Dis Clin North Am* 2002;16:875-94.

3. Garcia-Vidal C, Upton A, Kirby KA, et al. Epidemiology of invasive mold infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: biological risk factors for infection according to time after transplantation. *Clin Infect Dis* 2008;47:1041-50.

4. Nicolle MC, Bénet T, Thiebaut A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies: incidence and description of 127 cases enrolled in a single institution prospective survey from 2004 to 2009. *Haematologica* 2011;96:1685-91.

5. Hadrich I, Makni F, Sellami H, et al. Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology and environmental study in haematology patients (Sfax, Tunisia). *Mycoses* 2010;53:443-7.

6. López-Medrano F, Silva JT, Fernández-Ruiz M, et al. Risk Factors associated with early invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in kidney transplant recipients: results from a multinational matched case-control study. *Am J Transplant* 2016;16:2148-57.

7. Lortholary O, Gangneux JP, Sitbon K, et al. Epidemiological trends in invasive aspergillosis in France: the SAIF network (2005-2007). *Clin Microbiol Infect* 2011;17:1882-9.

8. Fuhren J, Voskuil WS, Boel CH, et al. High prevalence of azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus* isolates from high-risk patients. *J Antimicrob Chemother* 2015;70:2894-8.

9. Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, et al. Emergence of azole-resistant aspergillus fumigatus strains due to agricultural azole use creates an increasing threat to human health. *PLoS Pathog* 2013;9:e1003633.

10. Vermeulen E, Lagrou K, Verweij PE. Azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus*: a growing public health concern. *Curr Opin Infect Dis* 2013;26:493-500.

11. Lavergne RA, Morio F, Favennec L, et al. First description of azole-resistant *Aspergillus fumigatus* due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation in France. *Antimicrob Agents Chemother* 2015;59:4331-5.

12. Choukri F, Botterel F, Sitterlé E, et al. Prospective evaluation of azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus* clinical isolates in France. *Med Mycol* 2015;53:593-6.

13. O'Gorman CM. Airborne *Aspergillus fumigatus* conidia: a risk factor for aspergillosis. *Fungal Biol Rev* 2011;25:151-7.

14. Gangneux JP, Adjidé CC, Bernard L, et al. [Quantitative assessment of fungal risk in the case of construction works in healthcare establishments: Proposed indicators for the determination of the impact of management precautions on the risk of fungal infection]. *J Mycol Med* 2012;22:64-71.

15. Kanamori H, Rutala WA, Sickbert-Bennett EE, et al. Review of fungal outbreaks and infection prevention in healthcare settings during construction and renovation. *Clin Infect Dis* 2015;61:433-44.

16. Perraud M, Piens MA, Nicoloyannis N, et al. Invasive nosocomial pulmonary aspergillosis: risk factors and hospital building works. *Epidemiol Infect* 1987;99:407-12.

17. Bénet T, Nicolle MC, Thiebaut A, et al. Reduction of invasive aspergillosis incidence among immunocompromised patients after control of environmental exposure. *Clin Infect Dis* 2007;45:682-6.

18. Méheust D, Le Cann P, Reboux G, et al. Indoor fungal contamination: health risks and measurement methods in hospitals, homes and workplaces. *Crit Rev Microbiol* 2014;40:248-60.

19. Reboux G, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Bellanger AP, et al. A 10-year survey of fungal aerocontamination in hospital corridors: a reliable sentinel to predict fungal exposure risk? *J Hosp Infect* 2014;87:34-40.

20. Fournel I, Sautour M, Lafon I, et al. Airborne Aspergillus contamination during hospital construction works: efficacy of protective measures. *Am J Infect Control* 2010;38:189-94.

<footnote n="1">¹Laboratoire des Pathogènes Emergents-Fondation Mérieux, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI), Université de Lyon, Lyon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²EA 7380 Dynamyc, EnvA, UPEC, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Unité d'hygiène, épidémiologie et prévention, Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Laboratoire de Biologie Sécurité Environnement, Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Institut de Parasitologie et de Mycologie Médicale, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France</footnote>

<footnote>6Département de santé Publique, Institut des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques (ISPB)-Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France</footnote>
21. Dananché C, Gustin MP, Cassier P, et al. Evaluation of hirst-type spore trap to monitor environmental fungal load in hospital. *PLoS One* 2017;12:e0177263.

22. Gangneux JP, Bousseau A, Cornillet A, et al. Control of fungal environmental risk in French Hospitals. *Journal de Mycologie Médicale* 2006;16:204–11.

23. Méheust D, Gangneux JP, Cann PL. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations. *J Occup Environ Hyg* 2013;10:455–9.

24. Boff C, Brun CP, Miron D, et al. Technical note: the effect of different incubation temperatures on the recovery of *Aspergillus* species from hospital air. *Am J Infect Control* 2012;40:1016–7.

25. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer/invasive fungal infections cooperative group and the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases mycoses study group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group. *Clin Infect Dis* 2008;46:1813–21.

26. Hope WW, Walsh TJ, Denning DW. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. *Lancet Infect Dis* 2005;5:609–22.

27. Nicolle MC, Bénet T, Vanhems P. Nosocomial or community-acquired? *Med Mycol* 2011;49:24–9.

28. Bénet T, Voirin N, Nicolle MC, et al. Estimation of the incubation period of invasive aspergillosis by survival models in acute myeloid leukemia patients. *Med Mycol* 2013;51:214–8.

29. Thierry S, Wang D, Arné P, et al. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis for molecular typing of *Aspergillus fumigatus*. *BMC Microbiol* 2010;10:315.

30. Francisco AP, Vaz C, Monteiro PT, et al. PHYLOViZ: phylogenetic inference and data visualization for sequence based typing methods. *BMC Bioinformatics* 2012;13:87.

31. Espinel-Ingroff A, Arendrup M, Cantón E, et al. Multicenter study of method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values for detection of resistance in *Candida* spp. and *Aspergillus* spp. to Amphotericin B and echinocandins for the Etest Agar diffusion method. *Antimicrob Agents Chemother* 2017;61:e01792–16–16.

32. Risque infectieux fongique et travaux en établissements de santé. Identification du risque et mise en place de mesures de gestion. *Hygiène* 2009;19:1–53.

33. Fernández-Rodríguez S, Tormo-Molina R, Maya-Manzano JM, et al. Outdoor airborne fungi captured by viable and non-viable methods. *Fungal Ecol* 2014;7:16–26.

34. Grinn-Gofroń A. Airborne *Aspergillus* and *Penicillium* in the atmosphere of Szczecin, (Poland) (2004-2009). *Aerobiologia* 2011;27:67–76.

35. Fernández-Rodríguez S, Tormo-Molina R, Maya-Manzano JM, et al. Outdoor airborne fungi captured by viable and non-viable methods. *Fungal Ecol* 2014;7:16–26.

36. Fernández Rodríguez S, Tormo Molina R, Silva Palacios I, et al. Two sampling methods for the Petri dish detection of airborne fungi. *Grana* 2011;50:202–7.

37. Cavallo M, Andreoni S, Martinotti MG, et al. Monitoring environmental *Aspergillus* spp. contamination and meteorological factors in a haematological unit. *Mycopathologia* 2013;176:387–94.

38. Mahieu LM, De Dooy JJ, Van Laer FA, et al. A prospective study on factors influencing aspergillus spore load in the air during renovation works in a neonatal intensive care unit. *J Hosp Infect* 2000;45:191–7.

39. Bart-Delabesse E, Cordonnier C, Bretagne S. Usefulness of genotyping with microsatellite markers to investigate hospital-acquired invasive aspergillosis. *J Hosp Infect* 1999;42:321–7.

40. Menotti J, Waller J, Meunier O, et al. Epidemiological study of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in a haematology unit by molecular typing of environmental and patient isolates of *Aspergillus fumigatus*. *J Hosp Infect* 2005;60:61–8.

41. Guinea J, García de Viedma D, Peláez T, et al. Molecular epidemiology of *Aspergillus fumigatus*: an in-depth genotypic analysis of isolates involved in an outbreak of invasive aspergillosis. *J Clin Microbiol* 2011;49:3498–503.

42. Peláez T, Muñoz P, Guinea J, et al. Outbreak of invasive aspergillosis after major heart surgery caused by spores in the air of the intensive care unit. *Clin Infect Dis* 2012;54:e24–e31.

43. Alanio A, Bretagne S. Challenges in microbiological diagnosis of invasive *Aspergillus* infections. *F1000Res* 2017;6:157.

44. de Valk HA, Meis JF, Klaassen CH. Microsatellite based typing of *Aspergillus fumigatus*: strengths, pitfalls and solutions. *J Microbiol Methods* 2007;69:268–72.

45. de Valk HA, Meis JF, Bretagne S, et al. Interlaboratory reproducibility of a microsatellite-based typing assay for *Aspergillus fumigatus* through the use of allelic ladders: proof of concept. *Clin Microbiol Infect* 2009;15:180–7.

46. van der Linden JW, Snelders E, Kampinga GA, et al. Clinical implications of azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus*, The Netherlands, 2007-2009. *Emerg Infect Dis* 2011;17:1846–54.

47. Lelièvre L, Groh M, Angebault C, et al. Azole resistant *Aspergillus fumigatus*: an emerging problem. *Med Mal Infect* 2013;43:139–45.

48. Vermeulen E, Maertens J, Schoemans H, et al. Azole-resistant *Aspergillus fumigatus* due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation emerging in Belgium, July 2012. *Euro Surveill* 2012;17:pii: 20326.

49. Snelders E, Huis In 't Veld RA, Rijs AJ, et al. Possible environmental origin of resistance of *Aspergillus fumigatus* to medical triazoles. *Appl Environ Microbiol* 2009;75:4053–7.

50. Kano R, Sobukawa H, Murayama SY, et al. *In vitro* resistance of *Aspergillus fumigatus* to azole farm fungicide. *J Infect Chemother* 2016;22:133–6.

51. van der Linden JW, Camps SM, Kampinga GA, et al. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant *Aspergillus fumigatus* and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. *Clin Infect Dis* 2013;57:513–20.

52. Balloy V, Huerre M, Latgé JP, et al. Differences in patterns of infection and inflammation for corticosteroid treatment and chemotherapy in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. *Infect Immun* 2005;73:494–503.

53. Gregg KS, Kauffman CA. Invasive Aspergillosis: Epidemiology, Clinical Aspects, and Treatment. *Semin Respir Crit Care Med* 2015;36:662–72.

54. Kosmidis C, Denning DW. The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. *Thorax* 2015;70:270–7.

55. Meersseman W, Vandecasteele SJ, Wilmer A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients without malignancy. *Am J Respir Crit Care Med* 2004;170:621–5.

56. American Academy of Pediatrics. *Committee on Infectious Diseases*. *Red Book*. 28th edition. Elk Grove Village: IL, 2009.

57. Klaassen CH, Gibbons JG, Fedorova ND, et al. Evidence for genetic differentiation and variable recombination rates among Dutch populations of the opportunistic human pathogen *Aspergillus fumigatus*. *Mol Ecol* 2012;21:57–70.

58. Escher BI, Hackermüller J, Polte T, et al. From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects. *Environ Int* 2017;99:97–106.