# Experimental stress during molt suggests the evolution of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in the king penguin

Quentin Schull, Jean-Patrice Robin, F. Stephen Dobson, Hédi Saadaoui, Vincent Viblanc, Pierre Bize

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Quentin Schull, Jean-Patrice Robin, F. Stephen Dobson, Hédi Saadaoui, Vincent Viblanc, et al. Experimental stress during molt suggests the evolution of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in the king penguin. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8 (2), pp.1084 - 1095. 10.1002/ece3.3677. hal-01690531

HAL Id: hal-01690531

https://hal.science/hal-01690531v1

Submitted on 30 Oct 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Experimental stress during molt suggests the evolution of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in the king penguin

Quentin Schull<fnref n="1" /> ID | Jean-Patrice Robin<fnref n="1" /> | F. Stephen Dobson<fnref n="2" /> ID

Hédi Saadaoui<fnref n="1" /> | Vincent A. Viblanc<fnref n="1" />* ID | Pierre Bize<fnref n="3" />* ID

**Correspondence**

Quentin Schull, IPHC, UNISTRA, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.

Email: quentin.schull@gmail.com

**Funding information**

Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor, Grant/Award Number: Research program 119; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique, Grant/Award Number: Doctoral fellowship

**Abstract**

Sexual selection and social selection are two important theories proposed for explaining the evolution of colorful ornamental traits in animals. Understanding signal honesty requires studying how environmental and physiological factors during development influence the showy nature of sexual and social ornaments. We experimentally manipulated physiological stress and immunity status during the molt in adult king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*), and studied the consequences of our treatments on colourful ornaments (yellow-orange and UV beak spots and yellow-orange auricular feather patches) known to be used in sexual and social contexts in this species. Whereas some ornamental features showed strong condition-dependence (yellow auricular feather chroma, yellow and UV chroma of the beak), others were condition-independent and remained highly correlated before and after the molt (auricular patch size and beak UV hue). Our study provides a rare examination of the links between ornament determinism and selection processes in the wild. We highlight the coexistence of ornaments costly to produce that may be honest signals used in mate choice, and ornaments for which honesty may be enforced by social mediation or rely on genetic constraints.

**KEYWORDS**

Corticosterone, honest signal, Immunity, sexual selection, social selection

## 1 | INTRODUCTION

Understanding the evolution of conspicuous ornaments, often costly to produce and maintain, has been a long-standing focus of evolutionary biology (Andersson, 1994; Kuijper, Pen, & Weissing, 2012). Darwin (1871) laid the groundwork for this topic by observing that conspicuous ornaments could enhance access to sexual partners and reproduction, and that their evolution might be explained by sexual selection.

In the second half of the twentieth century, researchers realized that ornaments could also be used in competition for nonsexual resources, such as access to food and territories outside reproduction (Tobias, Montgomerie, & Lyon, 2012; West-Eberhard, 1983). West-Eberhard (1983) pointed out in her theory of social selection that ornaments can evolve whenever they enhance gene replication due "to differential success in social competition, whatever the resource at stake" (West-Eberhard, 1983). Consequently, sexual selection can be viewed as a

<footnote n="1">¹Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC, Strasbourg, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK</footnote>

<footnote>*These authors share seniorship.</footnote>

<footnote>This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</footnote>

<footnote>© 2017 The Authors. *Ecology and Evolution* published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</footnote>
"subset of social selection in which the resource at stake is mates" (Lyon & Montgomerie, 2012; West-Eberhard, 1983). However, drawing the line between ornaments that are under sexual versus "nonsexual social" selection (hereafter "social selection") can be complicated as many ornaments have multiple functions. For example, ornaments

used for courtship behavior may also be used for year-round territory defense (Tobias et al., 2012).

Regardless of function or selection process, ornament evolution may depend on how honestly they reflect the health, vigor, or dominance of their bearer (Tanaka, 1996; Zahavi, 1975). Three

<table><caption>**TABLE 1** Summary table of the relationships found in previous studies between color ornament features and behavioral or physiological features in king penguin</caption><thead><tr><th>Ornament</th><th>Origin</th><th>Color feature</th><th>Physiological/Behavioral feature</th><th>Relationship</th><th>Sex</th><th>References</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">Beak spot</td><td rowspan="5">Pigmentary (Yellow-Orange)</td><td rowspan="5">Chroma</td><td>Body condition</td><td>+</td><td>Female</td><td>Viblanc et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td>Energetic reserves (fasting period)</td><td>+</td><td>Male</td><td>Schull et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td>Ticks load</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Nolan et al., 2010;</td></tr><tr><td>Body condition</td><td>+</td><td>Male</td><td>Dobson et al. 2008; Viblanc et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Structural color (UV)</td><td rowspan="5">Brightness</td><td>Resting heart rate</td><td>+</td><td>Female</td><td>Viblanc et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td>Oxidative damages</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% CORT increase after stress (capture)</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Nolan et al., 2010;</td></tr><tr><td>Ticks load</td><td>+</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Schull et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5">Auricular patch</td><td rowspan="5">Morphometry</td><td rowspan="5">Size-area</td><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Jouventin et al., 2008; Pincemy et al., 2009; Nolan et al., 2010;</td></tr><tr><td>Aggressivity/more central position in the colony</td><td>+</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Viera et al., 2008; Keddar, Couchoux et al., 2015; Keddar, Jouventin et al., 2015</td></tr><tr><td>Natural antibodies level</td><td>-</td><td>Female & male</td><td>Viblanc et al., 2016;</td></tr><tr><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>+</td><td>Male</td><td>Pincemy et al., 2009;</td></tr><tr><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>-</td><td>Male</td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">Breast Patch</td><td rowspan="3">Pigmentary (Yellow-Orange)</td><td>Brightness</td><td>Delay in pairing</td><td>+</td><td>Male</td><td>Pincemy et al., 2009;</td></tr><tr><td>Chroma & hue</td><td>-</td><td>Male</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Hue</td><td>Cellular immune response (PHA)</td><td>-</td><td>Male</td><td>Nolan et al., 2006</td></tr></tbody></table>
alternative mechanisms have been proposed to guarantee signal honesty: condition-dependence, social mediation, or genetic constraint (Hill, 2014). Whereas the condition-dependent signaling hypothesis states that individuals in better condition can afford to produce ornaments of higher quality highlighting the cost of production and/or maintenance (Hill, 2011), the social mediation and genetic constraint hypotheses are frequently invoked to explain the occurrence of trait production that is condition-independent (Hill & Brawner, 1998; Roulin, 2016). Under the social mediation hypothesis, the costs of bearing bright ornaments may be defrayed only after trait production, whereas the genetic constraint hypothesis implies that the ornament is not necessarily costly to produce, but it is nonetheless difficult or impossible to cheat (genetically linked) (Hamilton & Zuk, 1982).

We experimentally tested for condition-dependence in ornament production in a monomorphic seabird, the king penguin (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*), by manipulating birds' physiological status during molt. King penguins are brightly colored seabirds that breed in large colonies (>10,000 breeding pairs) throughout the subAntarctic islands. They display showy ornaments with three different modalities of color production (Table 1). Orange beak spots contain both exogenous carotenoid pigments (McGraw et al., 2007) and specialized stacks of elongated lamellae (resulting from cellular specialization) that also reflect structural UV colors (Dresp & Langley, 2006). In addition, king penguins possess orange auricular feather ornaments that contain an endogenously synthetized pterin pigment (Thomas, McGoverin, McGraw, James, & Madden, 2013). Experimental reductions of beak UV reflectance and auricular patch size have been shown to decrease the likelihood of pairing and thus the initiation of a reproductive event (Jouventin, Nolan, Dobson, & Nicolaus, 2008; Nolan et al., 2010; Pincemy, Dobson, & Jouventin, 2009), demonstrating their important use in mutual mate choice. Correlative studies have also reported that individuals with larger auricular patches are more aggressive (Viera, Nolan, Côté, Jouventin, & Groscolas, 2008) enabling them to occupy more central breeding territories in the colony thought to be of greater reproductive value (Keddar, Jouventin, & Dobson, 2015; Viera et al.,

2008). Those results suggest that auricular patch size may function as a social signal of dominance. Further, the color of yellow breast feathers (also containing the endogenously synthetized pterin pigment) has been related to innate immunity (Nolan, Dobson, Dresp, & Jouventin, 2006), suggesting that genes involved in the production of that specific pigment may also be linked to the immune system. There is also support for links between ornament colors and various condition indices, including body size and condition, stress status, and metabolic rate (Keddar, Couchoux, Jouventin, & Dobson, 2015; Schull et al., 2016; Viblanc et al., 2016) (see Table 1). Finally, the beak spot ornament is a dynamic signal, reflecting short- to medium-term physiological changes in parasite loads and fasting status (Schull et al., 2016). However, experimental studies are now required to test whether trait production (i.e., beak spot and auricular patch coloration and size) is condition-dependent. A positive association between indices of condition and social ornaments may be explained by social dominance and increased access to resources, rather than by a cost of ornament production itself (e.g., Gonzalez, Sorci, & De Lope, 1999).

In the king penguin, both the entire plumage and the yellow-orange keratin beak plates are renewed each year during the molt, which occurs over a period of 3-4 weeks (Schull et al., 2016; see Figure 1). This particular context of a complete renewal (i.e., production) of all ornaments over a short period of time provides an ideal opportunity to investigate the costs of production of ornaments used in sexual and social contexts, and thus to examine whether sexual and social ornaments differ in their costs of production. To do so, we experimentally subjected molting birds to increased chronic stress (elevated glucocorticoid levels) or to an immune challenge (lipopolysaccharide LPS injection). Both chronic stress and immune stress are energy costly processes that can divert resource investment from the production of showy ornaments (Faivre, Grégoire, Préault, Cézilly, & Sorci, 2003; Folstad & Karter, 1992). Thus, we predicted that increasing stress through glucocorticoid manipulation or immune stimulation would hinder the ability of treated birds to invest in showy ornaments during the molt, when compared to control individuals.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 1** The molt of king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*). During the molt, king penguins renew their entire plumage (left panel) and their beak spot on each side of the beak (middle panel). The old keratin-based beak spots are shed (right panel)
## 2 | MATERIAL AND METHODS

### 2.1 | Study species and experimental procedures

Experiments were performed in the breeding colony of "La Baie du Marin" on Possession Island, Crozet Archipelago (46°26'S, 51°52'E, south Indian Ocean) over two consecutive field sessions: from November to February in 2014 and 2015. King penguins initiating their molt can be easily identified. They return before the start of their breeding cycle from a long foraging trip, weighing >16 kilos (for the usual weight of 13 kilos at the beginning of the breeding cycle) and molt in specific areas of the colony. All molting birds used in this study were captured in those specific areas and weighed on average (±SD) 16.98 ± 0.83 kg at the start of their molt.

In 2014, we subjected 30 molting birds (15 treated, 15 controls) to an experimental increase in baseline glucocorticoid levels. Treated birds were implanted with a subcutaneous corticosterone (CORT, G-111) pellet in the middle of their back, just above the hipline. Control birds were implanted with a placebo (SHAM implants, C-111, ©Innovative Research of America) (see Thierry, Ropert-Coudert, and Raclot (2013) for a description of the methodology in Adélie penguins). Both implants were designed to diffuse over a 21-day period. For CORT implants, this represented a 100 mg CORT release over 21-days. Similar implants in the Adélie penguin have been shown to result in a 2.4 times increase in baseline CORT levels, thus staying within the natural range observed in penguins, but mimicking a late fasting stage in this species (Spée et al., 2011). Breeding Adélie penguins present similar circulating CORT levels as king penguins during the molt (Bourgeon, Viera, Raclot, & Groscolas, 2007).

In 2015, we subjected 30 birds (15 treated, 15 controls) to an experimental immune challenge. A lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection inducing sickness symptoms, including fever, and leading to a physiological immune cascade response was used (Johnson, Curtis, Dantzer, & Kelley, 1993; Koutsos & Klasing, 2001; Xie, Rath, Huff, Huff, & Balog, 2000). The effects of LPS on the immune response are short-lived (a few days; Adler, Peng, Peng, & Klasing, 2001; van de Crommenacker et al., 2010; Costantini, Greives, Hau, & Partecke, 2014), and we therefore insured birds were chronically challenged over the entire period of the molt (2–4 weeks; Cherel, Leloup, & Le Maho, 1988; Bourgeon et al., 2007). Treated birds were thus injected 4 times (once every 3 days) with 2 mg of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) diluted in 1 mL of physiological serum (LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 © Sigma Aldrich). To avoid any risks of anaphylactic shock, the LPS dose injected (ca. 0.13 mg/kg) was 38 times lower than what is typically used in poultry studies (5 mg/kg; Cheng et al. 2004). Treated birds systematically showed signs of local inflammation (swelling) at the site of injection, confirming the treatment was effective. Control birds were injected with 1 mL physiological solution only (SHAM) and never showed signs of local swelling.

### 2.2 | Morphometric and ornamental measures

In both years, we obtained measurements of body mass and color ornaments at the beginning and end of the experiment. Both

experimental and control birds were initially measured at the start of the molt before providing the implants, and were measured a second time when caught after returning from their postmolt foraging trip of ca. 15 days (9–25 days) in order to court and breed.

When initially caught, birds were transported to a nearby dry shelter (within 10 m of the colony), and their body mass was measured to the nearest 2 g using an electronic scale. Flipper length (indices of structural size) was also measured to the nearest 1 mm using a solid metal ruler. We then regressed body mass on flipper size ($F_{1,43} = 6.50, p = .013, R^2 = .07$) and used the residuals as an index of body condition.

Colors reflected by the beak spot and the auricular patches were measured using a portable JAZ spectrophotometer (Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, FL, USA) containing a pulsed-xenon light with a spectral resolution of 0.3 nm across the spectral range of 320–700 nm, and was calibrated against a white standard (Ocean Optics Spectralon). Measures were repeated 3 times on each ornament (on both sides of the bird) using a 200 µm fiber-optic probe with a 90° angle window. Reflectance spectra of given ornaments were smoothed and averaged using an R script adapted from Montgomerie (2008). The obtained spectra (e.g., see Figure 2) were used to calculate mean brightness, hue, and chroma (see below) over the spectral range 320–700 nm, which corresponds to the full range of spectral sensitivity in birds (Cuthill, 2006). King penguin beak spots show a reflectance peak in UV violet (320–490 nm) and a plateau in the yellow-orange portion (491–700 nm) of the spectrum (Schull et al., 2016), and we calculated color variables separately over those two regions. In contrast, feathered auricular patches contain a pterin-based pigment (Thomas et al., 2013), only reflective above 450 nm. The spectral intensity, mean brightness ($UV_{brightness}$ and $YO_{brightness}$), was calculated by averaging reflectance over wavelengths: 320–490 nm and 491–700 nm for the beak, and 450–700 nm for the auricular patch (Montgomerie, 2006). Hue is a measure of color appearance (e.g., "blue" and "yellow"). For the yellow-orange plateau portion of the spectrum, $YO_{hue}$ was calculated as the wavelength at which the reflectance was halfway between its maximum and minimum (Keddar, Andris, Bonadonna, & Dobson, 2013). For the UV violet color of the beakspot, $UV_{hue}$ was calculated as the wavelength of maximum reflectance between 320 and 490 nm. Finally, chroma is a measure of color purity and was calculated within the region of interest ($UV_{chroma}$ and $YO_{chroma}$) as the difference between maximum and minimum reflectance over the mean reflectance for that particular region (formula S8; Hill & McGraw, 2006, p. 108). In the king penguin, correlations between beak UV color parameters based on a large sample in previous experiments show that brightness, hue and chroma signal different information to breeding birds (for a discussion, see Schull et al., 2016 and ESM 1 therein). In contrast, yellow-orange color parameters are highly correlated both in the beak and in the ear feather patches (see Schull et al., 2016 and ESM 1 therein). We thus chose to focus on $YO_{chroma}$ for both beak and auricular patch analyses, as this measure was the one presenting the highest among individual variation (thus containing the most information; Dale, 2006), and directly reflects ornament pigment concentrations in several bird species (McGraw & Gregory, 2004; Saks, McGraw, & Hörak, 2003).
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 2** Comparison of average raw spectral data of adult king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*) at the end of their molt, depending on whether they were treated with a CORT implant, an LPS challenge, or respective SHAMs. (a) & (c) represent beak spectra, (b) & (d) auricular patch spectra. Each spectrum was averaged over all birds for each condition</figcaption></figure>

## 2.3 | Statistical analyses

All analyses were run in the statistical computing software R (v. 3.1.1; R development Core Team 2013). Differences between treated and control groups at the beginning of the molt and when returning from the postmolt foraging trip for breeding were investigated using linear models (LMs). We succeeded in recapturing 10 CORT and 8 control birds in 2014, and 13 LPS and 13 control birds in 2015, explaining the slight variation in sample sizes in our various analyses. No individual (identified by a radio frequency PIT-Tag) was used repeatedly over the years. Bird sex (estimated during the molt based on a slight sexual dimorphism between males and females) could only be ascertained posteriorly during courtship when in direct morphometric comparison with the partner and using courtship songs (Jouventin, 1982; Jouventin & Dobson, 2017). Whereas only males were used in the LPS experiment (2015), 2 of the 10 CORT individuals and 2 of the 8 control birds in 2014 were females. Preliminary analyses showed no significant effects of sex, alone (LMs; 0.012 < *F*<sub>1,12</sub> < 2.416, 0.142 < *p* < .914) or in interaction (LMs; 0.078 < *F*<sub>3,14</sub> < 2.873, 0.114 < *p* < .785) with the CORT treatment; thus, sex was not retained in the final analyses. Running analyses with or without the females led to similar results, but decreased the power of our analyses. Therefore, it appeared reasonable to pool both sexes in our analyses. We found no evidence of a bias in size or coloration before the molt between individuals that were subsequently recaptured or not when returning from the postmolt foraging trip (LM models testing for effect of recapture [yes/no] alone or in interaction with treatment: 0.003 < *F*<sub>1,17</sub> &

*F*<sub>3,14</sub> < 2.304; 0.139 < *p* < .955). Initial body condition at molt onset was treated as a covariate in the analyses to account for initial condition effects on color parameters. For analyses on the size of the auricular patch, flipper size (as a size proxy) was also controlled for as a covariate in the analyses. Relationships between body condition and color parameters were investigated using linear models with body condition as the response variable and all ornamental features as fixed factors. Nonsignificant terms were excluded following a backward stepwise procedure (Quinn & Keough, 2002). Effect sizes and 95% CI were calculated after Nakagawa & Cuthill (2007) for color variables measured at (A) molt initiation and (B) after the molt. Correlations between color variables (hue, chroma, and brightness) before and after molt were investigated using Pearson correlation tests. F-statistics for fixed effects (tests of significant differences from zero) and *p*-values are given. Effects were considered significant for *p* < .05. Residuals were visually inspected for normality using *qqplots* (opposing theoretical quantiles to sample quantiles).

## 2.4 | Ethical statement

All experiments were approved by an independent ethics committee (Comités d'éthique Midi-Pyrénées et Alsace pour l'expérimentation animale) and comply with the current laws of France. Authorizations to enter the breeding colony and handle the birds were provided by the "Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises" (permit n°2014-127 issued on the 15 October 2014 and APAFIS#375 issued on the 17 July 2015).
# 3 | RESULTS

## 3.1 | Experiment 1: Corticosterone manipulation

At molt onset, CORT-treated and control birds did not differ significantly in their ornamental features (LMs; treatment: 0.02 < $F_{1,16}$ < 0.93, 0.341 < *p* < .964; Figure 3a) or body condition (LM; $F_{1,16}$ = 0.02, *p* = .888). When returning from their postmolt foraging trip to court, birds treated with a CORT implant had significantly lower $YO_{chroma}$ of their auricular patches (LM; $F_{1,16}$ = 5.48; *p* = .033) (Figure 3b,c). Effects of the CORT treatment on beak and auricular color spectra are provided in Figure 2a,b. The CORT treatment had no effect on body condition (LM; $F_{1,16}$ = 1.31, *p* = .271), beak spot coloration (LM; 0.066 < $F_{1,16}$ < 1.812, 0.198 < *p* < .801; Figure 2a), and auricular patch size (LM; $F_{1,15}$ = 0.12; *p* = .736; Figure 3b,c). The correlation between beak UV$_{hue}$ before and after the molt was high (*r* = .59, *t* = 2.85, *p* = .012, *N* = 18), as was that of auricular patch size (*r* = .67, *t* = 3.53, *p* = .003, *N* = 18); other relations were nonsignificant (0.099 < *p* < .997, *N* = 18) (Figure 4).

Initial body condition was only related to the $YO_{chroma}$ (estimate = 7.33 ± 1.88; $F_{1,16}$ = 28.93, *p* < .001) and size (estimate = 0.391 ± 0.113; *F* = 14.37, *p* = .002) of the auricular patch. No

significant links were found between body condition at birds' return from their postmolt foraging trip and ornamental features (LM; 0.01 < $F_{1,16}$ < 1.92, 0.199 < *p* < .979).

## 3.2 | Experiment 2: LPS immune challenge

At molt onset, both treated (LPS) and control birds were similar in terms of ornamental features (LMs; treatment: 0.89 < $F_{1,24}$ < 2.67, 0.120 < *p* < .360, Figure 5a) and body condition (LM; $F_{1,24}$ = 0.45, *p* = .509). When returning from their postmolt foraging trip to court, both beak UV$_{chroma}$ and the $YO_{chroma}$ of the auricular patches were lower in LPS-treated birds than in control birds (LMs; $F_{1,24}$ = 5.98; *p* = .023 and $F_{1,24}$ = 9.60; *p* = .005, respectively; Figure 5b,c). The effects of LPS treatment on beak and auricular color spectra are provided in Figure 2c,d. The LPS treatment had no significant effect on body condition (LM; $F_{1,24}$ = 0.642, *p* = .432), on the other color parameters, and on the size of the auricular patches (LMs; treatment: 0.11 < $F_{1,24}$ & $F_{1,23}$ < 1.02, 0.324 < *p* < .743; Figure 5b,c). Here again, the correlations for beak UV hue and auricular patch size measured before and after the molt were high (*r* = .65, *t* = 4.25, *p* < .001, *N* = 26

**FIGURE 3** Pre- (panel a) and post- (panel b) molt comparison of beak and auricular patch color variables (controlled for body condition at the beginning of the molt), and auricular patch surface (controlled for structural size and body condition) in king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*) treated at molt initiation with a corticosterone (CORT) or sham implant. Panel c represents marginal means (±SE) of color variables measured after the molt

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 4** Correlation of beak and auricular patch color variables, and auricular patch surface before (x-axis) and after the molt (y-axis), for the same king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*). Pearson correlation coefficients are given in the top right corner. CORT- and sham-treated birds are highlighted with red and black dots, respectively. A regression line is presented when the association is significant

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

**FIGURE 5** Pre- (panel a) and post- (panel b) molt comparison of beak and auricular patch color variables (controlled for body condition at the beginning of the molt), and auricular patch surface (controlled for structural size and body condition) for king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*) treated at molt initiation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or physiological serum (sham). Panel c represents marginal means (±SE) of color variables measured after the molt
and *r* = .44, *t* = 2.41, *p* = .024, *N* = 26, respectively); other relations were non-significant (0.123 < *p* < .698, *N* = 26) (Figure 6).

Initial body condition was related to auricular patch YO<sub>chroma</sub> (LM; F<sub>1,24</sub> = 4.67, *p* = .041). However, other parameters including the previous significant relation with auricular patch size (see Experiment 1) were not significantly related to initial body condition (LMs; 0.26 < F<sub>1,24</sub> < 4.67; 0.157 < *p* < .609). No significant links were found between body condition at birds' return from their postmolt foraging trip and ornamental features (LM; 0.12 < F<sub>1,24</sub> & F<sub>1,23</sub> < 1.37, 0.257 < *p* < .738).

## 4 | DISCUSSION

Ornaments can be used in sexual and/or social interactions (Hill, 2014; West-Eberhard, 1983) and, regardless of the selection process, are expected to honestly reflect individual health, vigor, or social status in competitive contexts (Tanaka, 1996; Zahavi, 1975). Ornament honesty can be enforced by production costs (condition-dependent signaling hypothesis; Hill, 2011), by the costs of bearing them in a social group (social mediation hypothesis; Rohwer, 1977), or by genetical constraints (i.e., linked to genes coding for immunocompetence; Whittingham, Freeman-Gallant, Taff, & Dunn, 2015). Here, we investigated ornament production costs in adult king penguins by manipulating physiological stress and immunity status during the molt. Our results showed that some ornamental features were strongly affected by our treatments (auricular patch YO<sub>chroma</sub> and beak spot UV<sub>chroma</sub>), while we found no evidence of treatment effects on other ornamental features (auricular patch size and beak spot UV<sub>hue</sub>). This demonstrates the coexistence of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in adult king penguins.

### 4.1 | Condition-dependent ornaments

The condition-dependent signaling hypothesis points out that the honesty of ornaments can come from unavoidable physiological or

developmental costs of production (thus, preventing dishonest signals; Hill, 2011). This hypothesis predicts the existence of a trade-off in energy or resource allocation between ornamentation and self-maintenance. Thus, energetically challenging birds during ornament production (i.e., during the molt) by increasing the energy demand into self-maintenance is expected to highlight trade-off investments between those processes. Body condition of birds at the beginning of the molt was positively linked to the YO<sub>chroma</sub> of their auricular patches in both experiments, suggesting that color production of that ornament is under an energetic trade-off. Accordingly, ornaments that changed in response to CORT and LPS treatments showed a decrease in the purity of ornamental colors. Birds treated with CORT molted new auricular patches for which feather YO<sub>chroma</sub> was lower than controls. Similarly, individuals repeatedly injected with LPS molted beak spots and ear feather patches for which UV<sub>chroma</sub> and YO<sub>chroma</sub>, respectively, were both lower than in controls.

The so-called stress hormone CORT is under the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (i.e., HPA) axis, and its release modulates energy allocation, allowing individuals to overcome challenging environmental conditions (Angelier, Wingfield, Weimerskirch, & Chastel, 2010). At short time scales, CORT release induces a rapid mobilization of energy resources, preparing the organism to cope with challenging situations (Peckett, Wright, & Riddell, 2011). Chronically elevated CORT leads to a reallocation of energy reserves into survival rather than other functions (Bókony et al., 2009; Spée et al., 2010), for example, by inhibiting vocalizations (Macdougall-Shackleton et al., 2009), coloration (Roulin et al., 2008), courtship (Moore & Miller, 1984), and breeding behavior (Angelier & Chastel, 2009). In this study, penguins experimentally treated with a CORT implant may have invested less in the endogenous synthesis of pterins, resulting in a decreased allocation of this pigment to their ornaments reflected by lower YO<sub>chroma</sub> of auricular patch feathers. Although changes in YO<sub>chroma</sub> have been directly linked to carotenoid pigment concentrations in feathers in other bird species (McGraw & Gregory, 2004; Saks et al., 2003), yellow-orange coloration in the

**FIGURE 6** Correlation of beak, auricular patch color variables, and auricular patch size before (x-axis) and after the molt (y-axis), for the same king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*). Pearson correlation coefficients are given in the top right corner. LPS- and sham-treated birds are highlighted with red and black dots, respectively. A regression line is presented when the association is significant

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>
auricular patch of the king penguin (Thomas et al., 2013) is due to pterins (and not carotenoids). However, the costs associated with pterin endogenous synthesis and allocation remain unclear. Because pterins have been proposed to have antioxidant or immune functions (McGraw, 2005; Oettl, Greilberger, & Reibnegger, 2004; Weiss, Kennedy, Safran, & McGraw, 2011), those pigments could have been devoted to protection against CORT-induced oxidative stress (Costantini, Marasco, & Møller, 2011) at the expense of auricular patch coloration.

The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (a subhypothesis of the condition-dependent signaling hypothesis) proposes that the production of ornaments comes at the expense of resistance to disease and parasites (Folstad & Karter, 1992). Several studies have shown positive links between immune efficiency and ornaments, notably ornamental coloration relying on exogenous pigment availability (Blount, Metcalfe, Birkhead, & Surai, 2003; Faivre, Préault et al., 2003), and reported a decrease in pigment-based coloration in immune-challenged individuals (Faivre, Grégoire et al., 2003). Thus, a trade-off in the allocation of pigments toward colorful ornaments or immune functions may explain the honesty of some ornamental features. In this study, LPS treatment stimulating the immune function of molting king penguins led to decreased purity in the yellow-orange color of auricular patch feathers (lower YO<sub>chroma</sub>), which may result from the allocation of pterins to immune functions at the expense of auricular patch coloration. The LPS treatment also induced a decrease in purity of the UV coloration of the beak spot (UV<sub>chroma</sub>). Conversely to YO<sub>chroma</sub> coloration of the auricular patch feathers, that is, due to pigments, beak spot UV reflectance in the king penguin has a structural basis resulting from crystal-like photonic microstructures in the horny layer of the beak (Dresp & Langley, 2006). Our results suggest that the production of that photonic structure may be costly, especially in response to an immune challenge.

A previous study where king penguins were treated with an antiparasitic solution outside the molting period (i.e., during breeding) showed a strong increase in beak spot UV hue and brightness and a weak decrease in UV chroma after parasite removal (Schull et al., 2016). Although those results support a link between beak spot UV coloration, immunity and parasitism, we would have expected an increase in UV chroma in response to parasite removal and/or a decrease in UV hue and brightness in response to LPS treatments (Griggio, Zanollo, & Hoi, 2010; Leclaire, Pauline, Chatelain, & Gasparini, 2014; Schull et al., 2016). Those results call for a deeper understanding of the physiological and structural mechanisms leading to changes in UV hue, brightness, and chroma, notably the importance of production and maturation of photonic structures during the molt versus maintenance and modulation of those structures afterwards (e.g., during breeding).

## 4.2 | Condition-independent ornaments

Previous studies have shown that environmental factors encountered during ornament production (parasites, food shortage, or other stressors) do not necessarily strongly impact their expression (Hill &

Brawner, 1998). In other words, the production/expression of those ornaments may be viewed as condition-independent, raising questions about what factors enforce their honesty (Hill, 2013; Roulin, 2016). In contrast to auricular patch YO chroma, auricular patch size at the beginning of the molt was not consistently associated with birds' body condition (see differences between Experiments 1 and 2). One explanation could be that auricular patch size depends on the birds' condition at the time they are molted (i.e., birds' energy status during their production the previous year) but do not necessarily reflect the birds' condition 1 year later. However, the lack of association between ornamental features and condition at their return from the postmolt foraging trip in both experiments, suggests this is unlikely. Alternatively, a lack of consistent association suggests that auricular patch size may not be condition-dependent. Indeed, we found no evidence that auricular patch size and beak spot UV hue were affected by CORT and LPS treatments. One hypothesis is that the honesty of condition-independent ornaments is enforced by social mediation (Rohwer, 1977; West-Eberhard, 1983). This hypothesis predicts that such ornaments should mirror social status and be constantly assessed during competitive interactions (Rohwer, 1977). Accordingly, auricular patch size in king penguins has been previously suggested to act as a social status badge, signaling individual competitiveness (Keddar, Couchoux et al., 2015; Viera et al., 2008). Individual penguins bearing larger auricular patches appear to be more aggressive and defend central breeding areas (Keddar, Couchoux et al., 2015; Viera et al., 2008) thought to be of higher quality (Bried & Jouventin, 2008) but see (Viblanc, Gineste, Stier, Robin, & Groscolas, 2014). The role of beak UV hue in social or sexual interactions is unknown. Experimental manipulation of auricular patch size (or beak UV hue) is now required to demonstrate whether bearing large auricular patches (or high UV wavelengths on the beak) entails socially mediated costs.

An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of condition-independent ornaments in response to environmental challenges is that ornaments reflect the genetic quality of their bearer (i.e., genetical constraint hypothesis; Hill, 2014). Indeed auricular patch size and beak spot UV hue were not affected by CORT and LPS treatments. Moreover, both traits showed similar expression before and after the molt. A similar strong relationship before and after the molt for beak spot UV hue was already observed in different individuals (Schull et al., 2016). Together, those findings indicate that the expression of auricular patch size and beak spot UV hue is maintained over time, which in turn suggests that their expression is largely determined by genetic or developmental factors encountered early in life that have lifelong consequences (e.g., silver spoon effects; Minias, Włodarczyk, Surmacki, & Iciek, 2015). However, the mechanisms linking individual genetic and epigenetic variation to trait production remain elusive. It has been recently proposed that ornament production could be constrained by the efficiency of vital cellular processes, with genes encoding for cellular metabolic pathways playing a key role in enforcing signal honesty (Hill, 2011, 2014). Because the mitochondrion is the powerhouse of the cell, variation in mitochondrial and nuclear genes, epigenetic status, and mitonuclear interactions could account for
interindividual genetic variation in ornament expression (Hill, 2014; Hill & Johnson, 2013). Work using larger sample sizes, individuals of both sexes, and investigating mitochondrial function during and outside the period of ornament production may provide insightful information on the honesty of UV signals in the king penguin, and more generally on the importance of mitochondrial efficiency as a mediator of signal honesty in the animal kingdom (Hill, 2011, 2014; Johnson & Hill, 2013).

## 5 | CONCLUSION

Taken together, our study provides evidence for the evolution of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in the king penguin, and suggests that variation in the cost of ornament expression could be rooted in their main use for mate attraction or for signaling social status. The expression of condition-dependent ornaments was revealed by the decrease in chroma of the yellow-orange auricular feathers, most likely explained by a low deposition of pterin pigments in those feathers. Despite pterins being endogenously synthesized pigments, this finding suggests the evolution of a trade-off in the allocation of pterin pigments to stress responses, such as antioxidant and immune functions, at the expense of colorful ornaments. This study also highlights that a unique ornament may evolve under non-mutually exclusive selective forces.

## ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Emilie Lefol for her help in the field and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. This research was funded by the French Polar Institute (IPEV-Research Program 119) and the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS-INEE). Field logistic support was provided by Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises. QS was funded by a doctoral fellowship from the Ministère Français de l'Éducation Supérieure et de la Recherche.

## CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

QS, VAV, and PB designed the study. QS, JPR, VAV, FSD, and HS did the fieldwork. QS, PB, and VAV analyzed the data and wrote the paper. FSD and JPR provided critical comments on the manuscript.

## ORCID

Quentin Schull ID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-3376

F. Stephen Dobson ID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-6316

Vincent A. Viblanc ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-659X

Pierre Bize ID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-4371

## REFERENCES

Adler, K. L., Peng, P. H., Peng, R. K., & Klasing, K. C. (2001). The Kinetics of Hemopexin and a1-Acid Glycoprotein Levels Induced by Injection of Inflammatory Agents in Chickens. *Avian Diseases, 45*, 289. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592967

Andersson, M. (1994). *Sexual Selection*. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Angelier, F., & Chastel, O. (2009). Stress, prolactin and parental investment in birds: A review. *General and Comparative Endocrinology, 163*, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.028

Angelier, F., Wingfield, J. C., Weimerskirch, H., & Chastel, O. (2010). Hormonal correlates of individual quality in a long-lived bird: A test of the "corticosterone-fitness hypothesis". *Biology Letters, 6*, 846–849. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0376

Blount, J. D., Metcalfe, N. B., Birkhead, T. R., & Surai, P. F. (2003). Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. *Science, 300*, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082142

Bókony, V., Lendvai, A. Z., Liker, A., Angelier, F., Wingfield, J. C., & Chastel, O. (2009). Stress response and the value of reproduction: Are birds prudent parents? *The American Naturalist, 173*, 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/597610

Bourgeon, S., Viera, V. M., Raclot, T., & Groscolas, R. (2007). Hormones and immunoglobulin levels in king penguins during moulting and breeding fasts. *Ecoscience, 14*, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[519:HAILIK]2.0.CO;2

Bried, J., & Jouventin, P. (2008). The king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus), a non-nesting bird which selects its breeding habitat. *Ibis, 143*, 670–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2001.tb04895.x

Cherel, Y., Leloup, J., & Le Maho, Y. (1988). Fasting in king penguin. II. Hormonal and metabolic changes during molt. *American Journal of Physiology, 254*, R178–R184.

Costantini, D., Greives, T. J., Hau, M., & Partecke, J. (2014). Does urban life change blood oxidative status in birds? *Journal of Experimental Biology, 217*, 2994–2997. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.106450

Costantini, D., Marasco, V., & Møller, A. P. (2011). A meta-analysis of glucocorticoids as modulators of oxidative stress in vertebrates. *Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 181*, 447–456.

van de Crommenacker, J., Horrocks, N. P. C., Versteegh, M. A., Komdeur, J., Tieleman, B. I., & Matson, K. D. (2010). Effects of immune supplementation and immune challenge on oxidative status and physiology in a model bird: Implications for ecologists. *Journal of Experimental Biology, 213*, 3527–3535. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.045591

Cheng, H. W., Freire, R., & Pajor, E. A. (2004). Endotoxin stress responses in chickens from different genetic lines. 1. Sickness, behavioral, and physical responses. *Poultry Science, 83*, 707–715.

Cuthill, I. C. (2006). Color perception. In K. J. Hill, & G. E. McGraw (Eds.), *Bird Coloration, Volume 1: Mechanisms and Measurements* (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dale, J. (2006). Intraspecific variation in coloration. In G. E. Hill, & K. J. McGraw (Eds.), *Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution* (pp. 597–602). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Darwin, C. (1871). *The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex*. London: John Murray.

Dresp, B., & Langley, K. (2006). Fine structural dependence of ultraviolet reflections in the King penguin beak horn. *The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology, 288*, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4892

Dobson, F. S., Nolan, P. M., Nicolaus, M., Bajzak, C., Coquel, A. S., & Jouventin, P. (2008). Comparison of color and body condition between early and late breeding king penguins. *Ethology, 114*, 925–933.

Faivre, B., Grégoire, A., Préault, M., Cézilly, F., & Sorci, G. (2003). Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. *Science, 300*, 103. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1081802
Faivre, B., Préault, M., Salvadori, F., Théry, M., Gaillard, M., & Cézilly, F. (2003). Bill colour and immunocompetence in the European blackbird. *Animal Behaviour, **65**, 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2142

Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immuno-competence handicap. *The American Naturalist*, **139**, 603. https://doi.org/10.1086/285346

Gonzalez, G., Sorci, G., & De Lope, F. (1999). Seasonal variation in the relationship between cellular immune response and badge size in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). *Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology*, **46**, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050600

Griggio, M., Zanollo, V., & Hoi, H. (2010). UV plumage color is an honest signal of quality in male budgerigars. *Ecological Research*, **25**, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-009-0632-3

Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? *Science*, **218**, 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123238

Hill, G. E. (2011). Condition-dependent traits as signals of the functional-ity of vital cellular processes. *Ecology Letters*, **14**, 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01622.x

Hill, G. E. (2014a). Cellular respiration: The nexus of stress, condition, and ornamentation. *Integrative and comparative biology*, **54**, 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icu029

Hill, G. E. (2013). The evolution of ornaments and armaments. In K. Yasakawa (Ed.), *Animal behavior: Function and evolution*, Vol. 2. New York: Prager.

Hill, G. E., & Brawner, W. R. (1998). Melanin-based plumage coloration in the house finch is unaffected by coccidial infection. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, **265**, 1105–1109. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0405

Hill, G. E., & Johnson, J. D. (2013). The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection. *Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, **280**, 20131314. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1314

Hill, G. E., & McGraw, K. J. (2006). *Bird Coloration: Mechanisms and Measurements*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnson, R. W., Curtis, S. E., Dantzer, R., & Kelley, K. W. (1993). Central and peripheral prostaglandins are involved in sickness behavior in birds. *Physiology & Behavior*, **53**, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90020-6

Johnson, J. D., & Hill, G. E. (2013). Is carotenoid ornamentation linked to the inner mitochondria membrane potential? A hypothesis for the maintenance of signal honesty. *Biochimie*, **95**, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2012.10.021

Jouventin, P. (1982). Visual and vocal signals in penguins, their evolution and adaptive characters. *Fortschritte der Verhaltensforschung*, **24**, 148.

Jouventin, P., & Dobson, F. S. (2017). *Why Penguins Communicate: The Evolution of Visual and Vocal Signals* (p. 315). London: Academic Press.

Jouventin, P., Nolan, P. M., Dobson, F. S., & Nicolaus, M. (2008). Coloured patches influence pairing rate in king penguins. *Ibis*, **150**, 193–196.

Keddar, I., Andris, M., Bonadonna, F., & Dobson, F. S. (2013). Male-biased mate competition in king penguin trio parades. *Ethology*, **119**, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12076

Keddar, I., Couchoux, C., Jouventin, P., & Dobson, F. S. (2015). Variation of mutual colour ornaments of king penguins in response to winter resource availability. *Behaviour*, **152**, 1679–1700. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003299

Keddar, I., Jouventin, P., & Dobson, F. S. (2015). Color ornaments and territory position in king penguins. *Behavioural Processes*, **119**, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.003

Koutsos, E. A., & Klasing, K. C. (2001). The acute phase response in Japanesees quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). *Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology*, **128**, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(00)00199-x

Kuijper, B., Pen, I., & Weissing, F. J. (2012). A guide to sexual selection theory. *Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics*, **43**, 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160245

Leclaire, S., Pauline, P., Chatelain, M., & Gasparini, J. (2014). Feather bacterial load affects plumage condition, iridescent color, and investment in preening in pigeons. *Behavioral Ecology*, **25**, 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru109

Lyon, B. E., & Montgomerie, R. (2012). Sexual selection is a form of social selection. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences*, **367**, 2266–2273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0012

Macdougall-Shackleton, S. A., Dindia, L., Newman, A. E. M., Potvin, D. A., Stewart, K. A., & Macdougall-Shackleton, E. A. (2009). Stress, song and survival in sparrows. *Biology letters*, **5**, 746–748. https://doi.org/10.1098/rslb.2009.0382

McGraw, K. J. (2005). The antioxidant function of many animal pigments: Are there consistent health benefits of sexually selected co-lourants? *Animal Behaviour*, **69**, 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.022

McGraw, K. J., & Gregory, A. J. (2004). Carotenoid pigments in male american goldfinches: What is the optimal biochemical strategy for becoming colourful? *Biological Journal of the Linnean Society*, **83**, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00388.x

McGraw, K. J., Toomey, M. B., Nolan, P. M., Morehouse, N. I., Massaro, M., & Jouventin, P. (2007). A description of unique fluorescent yellow pigments in penguin feathers. *Pigment cell research*, **20**, 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2007.00386.x

Minias, P., Włodarczyk, R., Surmacki, A., & Iciek, T. (2015). Silver spoon effects on plumage quality in a passerine bird. *Royal Society Open Science*, **2**, 140459. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140459

Montgomerie, R. (2006). Analyzing colors. In G. E. Hill & K. J. McGraw (Eds.), *Bird Coloration. Volume 1: Mechanisms and Measurements* (pp. 90–147). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Montgomerie, R. (2008). RCLR. Kingston, Canada: Queen's University.

Moore, F. L., & Miller, L. J. (1984). Stress-induced inhibition of sexual behavior: Corticosterone inhibits courtship behaviors of a male amphibian. *Taricha granulosa*. *Hormones and Behavior*, **18**, 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(84)90026-6

Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. *Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society*, **82**, 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x

Nolan, P. M., Dobson, F. S., Dresp, B., & Jouventin, P. (2006). Immunocompetence is signalled by ornamental colour in king penguins (*Aptenodytes patagonicus*). *Evolutionary Ecology Research*, **8**, 1325–1332.

Nolan, P. M., Stephen Dobson, F., Nicolaus, M., Karels, T. J., McGraw, K. J., & Jouventin, P. (2010). Mutual mate choice for colorful traits in king penguins. *Ethology*, **116**, 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01775.x

Oettl, K., Greilberger, J., & Reibnegger, G. (2004). Modulation of Free Radical Formation by Pterin Derivatives. *Pteridines*, **15**, 97–101.

Peckett, A. J., Wright, D. C., & Riddell, M. C. (2011). The effects of glucocorticoids on adipose tissue lipid metabolism. *Metabolism*, **60**, 1500–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2011.06.012

Pincemy, G., Dobson, F. S., & Jouventin, P. (2009). Experiments on colour ornaments and mate choice in king penguins. *Animal Behaviour*, **78**, 1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.041

Quinn, G. P., & Keough, J. M. (2002). *Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists*. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384

R Development Core Team (2008). *R: A language and environment for statistical computing*. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

Rohwer, S. (1977). Status signaling in harris sparrows: Some experiments in deception. *Behaviour*, **61**, 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853977X00504

Roulin, A. (2016). Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration. *Biological Reviews*, **91**, 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12171
Roulin, A., Almasi, B., Rossi-Pedruzzi, A., Ducrest, A. L., Wakamatsu, K., Miksik, I., ... Jenni, L. (2008). Corticosterone mediates the condition-dependent component of melanin-based coloration. *Animal Behaviour*, 75, 1351-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.007

Saks, L., McGraw, K., & Hörak, P. (2003). How feather colour reflects its carotenoid content. *Functional Ecology*, 17, 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00765.x

Schull, Q., Dobson, S., Stier, A., Robin, J. P., Bize, P., & Viblanc, V. A. (2016). Beak colour dynamically signals changes in fasting status and parasite loads in king penguins. *Behavioral Ecology*, 27, 1684-1693, arw091. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw091

Spée, M., Beaulieu, M., Dervaux, A., Chastel, O., Le, Y., & Raclot, T. (2010). Hormones and behavior should I stay or should I go? Hormonal control of nest abandonment in a long-lived bird, the Adelie penguin. *Hormones and Behavior*, 58, 762-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.07.011

Spée, M., Marchal, L., Thierry, A. M., Chastel, O., Enstipp, M., Le Maho, Y., ... Raclot, T. (2011). Exogenous corticosterone mimics a late fasting stage in captive adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). *American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology*, 300, R1241-R1249. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00762.2010

Tanaka, Y. (1996). Social selection and the evolution of animal communication signals. *Evolution*, 50, 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03864.x

Thierry, A. M., Ropert-Coudert, Y., & Raclot, T. (2013). Elevated corticosterone levels decrease reproductive output of chick-rearing Adelie penguins but do not affect chick mass at fledging. *Conservation Physiology*, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cot007

Thomas, D. B., McGoverin, C. M., McGraw, K. J., James, H. F., & Madden, O. (2013). Vibrational spectroscopic analyses of unique yellow feather pigments (spheniscins) in penguins. *Journal of The Royal Society Interface*, 10, 20121065. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.1065

Tobias, J. A., Montgomerie, R., & Lyon, B. E. (2012). The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: Social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences*, 367, 2274-2293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0280

Viblanc, V. A., Dobson, F. S., Stier, A., Schull, Q., Saraux, C., Gineste, B., ... Bize, P. (2016). Mutually honest? Physiological "qualities" signalled by

colour ornaments in monomorphic king penguins. *Biological Journal of the Linnean Society*, 118, 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12729

Viblanc, V. A., Gineste, B., Stier, A., Robin, J.-P., & Groscolas, R. (2014). Stress hormones in relation to breeding status and territory location in colonial king penguin: A role for social density? *Oecologia*, 175, 763-772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2942-6

Viera, V. M., Nolan, P. M., Côté, S. D., Jouventin, P., & Groscolas, R. (2008). Is territory defence related to plumage ornaments in the King penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus? *Ethology*, 114, 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01454.x

Weiss, S. L., Kennedy, E. A., Safran, R. J., & McGraw, K. J. (2011). Pterin-based ornamental coloration predicts yolk antioxidant levels in female striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus). *Journal of Animal Ecology*, 80, 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01801.x

West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. *The Quarterly Review of Biology*, 58, 155-183. https://doi.org/10.1086/413215

Whittingham, L. A., Freeman-Gallant, C. R., Taff, C. C., & Dunn, P. O. (2015). Different ornaments signal male health and MHC variation in two populations of a warbler. *Molecular Ecology*, 24, 1584-1595. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13130

Xie, H., Rath, N. C., Huff, G. R., Huff, W. F., & Balog, J. M. (2000). Effects of Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide on broiler chickens. *Poultry Science*, 79, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.1.33

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection-A selection for a handicap. *Journal of Theoretical Biology*, 53, 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3

**How to cite this article:** Schull Q, Robin J-P, Dobson FS, Saadaoui H, Viblanc VA, Bize P. Experimental stress during molt suggests the evolution of condition-dependent and condition-independent ornaments in the king penguin. *Ecol Evol*. 2018;8:1084-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3677