# Nexus approach to enhance water-energy-food security and ecosystems resilience under climate change in the Mediterranean

Philippe Drobinski, Marta Rivera Ferre, Mohamed Abdel Monem, Assem Abu Hatab, Mohamed Behnassi, Tarik Chfadi, Wolfgang Cramer, Marta Debolini, Fatima Driouech, Ahmed El-Kenawy, et al.

► To cite this version:

Philippe Drobinski, Marta Rivera Ferre, Mohamed Abdel Monem, Assem Abu Hatab, Mohamed Behnassi, et al. Nexus approach to enhance water-energy-food security and ecosystems resilience under climate change in the Mediterranean. npj Climate Action, 2025, 4 (1), pp.115. 10.1038/s44168-025-00308-4. hal-05433359

HAL Id: hal-05433359

https://amu.hal.science/hal-05433359v1

Submitted on 5 Jan 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Nexus approach to enhance water-energy-food security and ecosystems resilience under climate change in the Mediterranean

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

Philippe Drobinski¹,²✉, Marta G. Rivera Ferre³, Mohamed Abdel Monem⁴, Assem Abu Hatab⁵,⁶, Mohamed Behnassi⁷,⁸, Tarik Chfadi⁹, Wolfgang Cramer¹⁰, Marta Debolini¹¹, Fatima Driouech⁹, Ahmed El-Kenawy¹², Margarita García-Vila¹³, Joël Guiot¹⁴, Emilia Lamonaca¹⁵, Feliu López-i-Gelats¹⁶, Žiga Malek¹⁷, Maria P. Papadopoulou¹⁸ & Fabio G. Santeramo¹⁵

The Mediterranean Basin, already a water-scarcity hotspot, faces intensifying droughts and warming that strain the water-energy-food-ecosystems (WEFE) nexus. Climate impacts cascade across sectors, while siloed responses risk maladaptation. Nexus-based solutions—centred on water—can foster synergies and reduce trade-offs, with nature-based, socially inclusive, and clean energy strategies offering transformative potential. Yet governance, cooperation, and data gaps persist; closing these is vital to operationalize the nexus and advance regional sustainability.

The Mediterranean basin has long demonstrated resilience to harsh environmental challenges, including arid, hot climates and nutrient-poor soils. These conditions have shaped its land- and sea-scapes and fostered agricultural, fisheries and water management practices refined over millennia¹. However, recent IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and MedECC (Mediterranean Experts on Climate and environmental Change) reports underscore that the region is warming 20% faster than the global average, altering rainfall patterns and accelerating sea-level rise, all meeting increasingly fragile socio-economic systems²⁻⁴. This alarming trajectory confirms the Mediterranean as a 'climate change hotspot'⁵, with escalating climate hazards compounded by high vulnerability and exposure¹. Among these, drought emerges as the primary and most wide-spread risk factor, driven by rising evaporative demand and declining precipitation⁶⁻⁸. The latest IPCC report and subsequent attribution studies confirm that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of agricultural and hydrological droughts in the Mediterranean⁹,¹⁰. Moreover, confidence in human influence contributing to the severity of these events is highest—at a medium confidence level—specifically in Mediterranean climates, as defined by the Köppen climate classification, which includes the Mediterranean region and western North America¹¹. These increasingly arid conditions exacerbate water scarcity, threatening agriculture, ecosystems, and, to some extent, energy systems³,¹²,¹³. Water scarcity, the main challenge identified in the Mediterranean region, both as a long-standing structural issue and as a pressure intensified by climate change, is deeply interconnected with the socio-economic vulnerabilities of

the basin. This unsustainability manifests not only through pervasive insecurity but also through pronounced regional disparities with stronger resource limitations in the South and East of the basin. The intricate interdependencies between water, energy, food and ecosystems (WEFE) further compound these challenges, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated and equitable solutions, as responses aiming to address challenges linked to one component in isolation may start a series of cascading effects on the other components of WEFE¹⁴. Climate change, but also other direct (e.g. pollution, land use changes) and indirect (e.g. lifestyle changes, population growth, conflict) drivers of change, exacerbate these linkages, heightening the risks of water scarcity and resource mismanagement, which pose critical threats to the region's resilience and sustainability¹⁵. For this reason, responses to safeguard the water-scarce region's future should follow a nexus approach to increase the synergies among WEFE components interactions and reduce potential trade-offs leading to maladaptation, and to promote integrated solutions that optimize co-benefits across different sectors. For instance, in the context of water scarcity, unsustainable irrigation practices have caused heightened soil salinity and extensive land degradation in certain areas¹,¹⁶ further exacerbating water and food insecurity and reducing ecosystems health. These outcomes result from adaptation strategies narrowly focused on singular short-term goals, such as maximizing food production through intensive agriculture, often at the cost of water availability, soil health, and biodiversity. For example, Morocco's solar-powered irrigation systems have improved agricultural water efficiency, but when deployed without governance oversight, they risk
accelerating aquifer depletion¹⁷. In Sicily, the expansion of tropical crops like mangoes reflects adaptation, but also raises concerns over ecosystem transformation¹⁸. These trends reflect a fundamental tension: while short-term sectoral responses may seem effective in isolation, they often deepen interlinked vulnerabilities by neglecting systemic feedbacks. Technological fixes, for instance, may increase efficiency but fall short without behavioural change, institutional coordination, and supportive policy frameworks. A notable example is the large-scale irrigation modernization programme carried out in Spain between 2002 and 2015, one of the most extensive globally. While its primary objective was to increase application efficiency, analyses have shown that it did not result in actual water savings. Instead, it led to a rebound effect, where improved efficiency paradoxically encouraged greater water use¹⁹,²⁰. This case highlights that technology adoption must be accompanied by complementary measures such as robust water accounting systems and appropriate allocation frameworks. Similarly, other Mediterranean experiences underline that innovation without governance may foster maladaptation. For instance, the expansion of solar-powered groundwater pumping in the Kebili Region (Tunisia) provided new opportunities for farmers but also contributed to groundwater depletion when introduced without regulatory safeguards¹⁴. Another case is wastewater reuse: widely practiced in the southern Mediterranean, it remains constrained by weak governance and fragmented legislation, limiting its potential as a safe and sustainable nexus solution¹⁴. These examples demonstrate that technological advances in the region can only deliver long-term benefits when embedded within coherent governance and institutional frameworks. This underscores the need to transition from fragmented adaptation to an integrated paradigm.

While integrative frameworks, such as Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) or Social-Ecological Systems (SES), have been applied to resource challenges, they show important limitations in the Mediterranean context. IWRM, though relevant for water-scarce regions, is predominantly water-centric and typically applied at the river basin scale, which often overlooks broader socio-political dynamics. The SES framework integrates ecological, social, and economic perspectives through systems thinking, but its insights are frequently difficult to operationalize or translate into actionable policy. By contrast, a WEFE nexus approach enables a more comprehensive analysis of the interconnections and interdependencies among water, energy, food systems, and ecosystems, emphasizing policy coherence and integrated resource planning at national and regional scales. This makes it particularly suited to identifying sectoral trade-offs, enhancing synergies and resource efficiency, and reducing the risk of maladaptation. For example, irrigation modernization projects that only addressed water efficiency gains, without considering broader nexus dynamics, have in some cases resulted in rebound effects and unintended pressures on other sectors¹⁴,²¹.

The objective of this perspective is to assess how climate change intensifies the interlinked challenges of the WEFE nexus in the Mediterranean, with water scarcity as the defining and most pressing issue. We specifically aim to (i) synthesize evidence of how climate change is amplifying drought, variability in water availability, and cascading risks across energy, food, and ecosystems, (ii) examine how these pressures create trade-offs and feedbacks when addressed in isolation, and (iii) highlight nexus-based adaptation and mitigation solutions that place water at their core while fostering synergies, reducing trade-offs, and providing lessons for other water-scarce regions globally. The scope of this article is to synthesize existing knowledge and highlight opportunities for advancing nexus-based solutions, rather than to develop a new quantitative framework. Based on a systematic literature review and expert knowledge, this perspective adopts a structured approach that first outlines the key regional challenges, then examines sectoral WEFE interdependencies, and finally explores nexus-based solutions for adaptation and resilience. However, we complement our synthesis by drawing on existing analytical case studies in the Mediterranean that employ quantitative approaches (e.g. assessments of irrigation modernization or agrivoltacs deployment in Spain, expansion of solar-powered groundwater pumping in Tunisia, rebound effects of water efficiency

interventions, resilience analyses through a WEFE nexus lens in Lebanon, ...). These examples demonstrate how quantitative evidence supports the insights discussed here and illustrate the potential for integrating case-based analysis with broader nexus perspectives. By integrating a ripple-effect framework, we highlight how climate change-driven changes in one sector cascade through others, emphasizing the need for holistic, cross-sectoral policymaking to help frame resilience, as illustrated for instance for Lebanon²².

## Cascading effects of climate change and associated responses on water, energy and food security, and ecosystem health

The concept of cascading effects forms the crux of understanding how interconnected the WEFE components truly are in the Mediterranean region. This perspective highlights that no component—water, energy, food, or ecosystems—exists in isolation; rather, they are woven into a complex and dynamic web where changes in one domain reverberate through the others. Climate change, as a dominant direct driving force, acts as a catalyst that magnifies these interactions (Fig. 1, left-hand side).

## Interconnected water, energy, food security and ecosystems health challenges in the Mediterranean

In the water-scarce Mediterranean region, the interconnections between water, energy, food security, and ecosystem health are particularly intricate, forming dynamic feedback loops and trade-offs that deeply influence the region's sustainability and resilience. Water scarcity, already a defining feature of the Mediterranean climate, is exacerbated by climate change, while water plays a central role not only in sustaining ecosystems but also in supporting agricultural production, energy generation, and human well-being³. It is fundamental to maintaining healthy ecosystems, reducing disease burdens, promoting gender equity, and enhancing both social welfare and economic productivity. Moreover, water is pivotal in climate change adaptation and peacebuilding, acting as a vital connector between the climate system, human society, and the environment²³.

However, warming and rainfall patterns change result in increased freshwater shortages and desertification throughout the basin²⁴⁻²⁷. The per capita availability of renewable water resources declined between 1962 and 2017 by 78% for the Eastern Mediterranean and 68% for the Southern Mediterranean²⁸. Water scarcity, driven by reduced rainfall and over-extraction, initiates a domino effect and conflicts across all water-dependent sectors (energy, agriculture, tourism, industry, domestic use, as well as biodiversity conservation)¹²,¹³,²⁸,²⁹.

The Mediterranean region's food system is shaped by the traditional Mediterranean diet, which emphasizes seasonal, plant-based foods and local production practices, contributing to relatively low environmental impacts compared to global dietary patterns³⁰. This agroecological model promotes biodiversity and resource efficiency, especially in water-scarce conditions typical of the region³¹. However, increasing exposure to extreme events such as droughts and heatwaves threaten traditional crops like olives and grapes³²⁻³⁵. These pressures are compounded by structural trade asymmetries: Southern and Eastern Mediterranean countries prioritize domestic food security but also export select crops (e.g., olive oil, citrus), whereas Northern Mediterranean countries are oriented toward export markets³⁶,³⁷. These trade dynamics increase the system's exposure to external shocks and uneven vulnerabilities. For instance, Lebanon's vulnerability to simultaneous climate and economic shocks induce significant risks to the country's ability to maintain a Mediterranean food basket³⁸ while in the Middle East and North Africa, food trade impacts water, food, and land security as trade-offs across sectors can exacerbate vulnerabilities under conditions of water scarcity and climate stress³⁹. Together, these studies underscore how cross-sectoral and cross-border trade dynamics shape the cascading impacts of climate change on Mediterranean food systems. These trends underscore the Mediterranean's dual identity as a model for sustainable diets and a climate-sensitive agricultural zone requiring urgent adaptation strategies. The Mediterranean food system is also entangled in the complex
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1 |** Impacts, interactions and cascading effects on the WEFE outcomes of climate change and solutions designed in a sectoral approach. The left-hand side displays the impacts of climate change, on the various processes related to the nexus components and the overall positive or negative effect it has on each nexus component and associated outcomes. The right-hand side displays the various response</figcaption></figure>

options for each WEFE component, their different interactions, synergies and trade-offs to the nexus and their eventual positive or negative effect on each WEFE component, and climate change itself. The red (resp. green) arrows display feedbacks deteriorating (resp. improving) a WEFE component or climate trend.

interactions with water, energy, and environmental systems within the WEFE nexus. Climate change, water scarcity and land degradation are projected to cause a 17% decline in agricultural output by 2050, with substantial regional disparities. Lower agricultural yields, caused by drought and heat stress, intensify reliance on irrigation, which again heightens competition for already scarce water resources<sup>12,40</sup>. Rising food prices, a consequence of reduced productivity, place additional stress on energy systems as transportation and processing costs escalate<sup>41</sup>. Vulnerable populations, particularly in North Africa and the Near East, bear the brunt of these interlinked crises, facing not only food insecurity but also socio-economic instability<sup>42</sup>.

The Mediterranean region's energy system exhibits distinct characteristics shaped by its geopolitical significance, resource endowments, and socio-economic dynamics. Its strategic location makes it a crucial energy hub between Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, with geopolitical, economic, and environmental challenges shaping its future. The Mediterranean region's energy system is marked by a strong dependence on fossil fuels<sup>13</sup>, underpinned by persistent subsidies that hamper progress toward a low-carbon transition<sup>43,44</sup>. Despite the Mediterranean's considerable potential for renewable energy—especially solar and wind—structural challenges remain, including outdated infrastructure, fragmented markets, and limited cross-border coordination<sup>13,45</sup>. These barriers hinder the region's ability to capitalize on its natural advantages. Achieving a successful energy transition in the Mediterranean will require integrated regional planning, infrastructure investments, and policy harmonization to fully exploit renewable resources and enhance long-term energy security<sup>13,45,46</sup>. The Mediterranean region's energy system, while positioned as a solution to mitigate climate

change through the provisioning of renewable energy, also contribute to the cascading effects. Hydropower generation potential suffers under diminished water flow, prompting a shift toward thermal or renewable energy sources<sup>13</sup>. The land-use demands of renewable energy farms or biofuel crops create conflicts with food production and the necessary conservation or restoration of ecosystems<sup>47,48</sup>.

As for the ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin, climate change exacerbates existing environmental vulnerabilities by increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires and facilitating the spread of non-indigenous species. These changes threaten the region's rich but fragile ecosystems and biodiversity, with cascading effects on key socio-economic sectors such as fisheries, agriculture, and tourism—pillars of Mediterranean livelihoods<sup>49,50</sup>. The resulting strain on natural resources contributes to growing water, energy, and food insecurity<sup>49</sup>, reinforcing the region's status as a climate hotspot.

In sum, climate-driven disruptions to one component of the water-energy-food-ecosystems (WEFE) nexus often trigger ripple effects across others. For example, declining water availability due to droughts and rising temperatures affects agricultural yields and the energy required for irrigation<sup>40</sup>. In this highly interconnected and resource-stressed region, addressing the compounded effects of climate change on all WEFE dimensions requires tailored, integrated adaptation strategies that reflect the Mediterranean's unique ecological and socio-economic context<sup>51</sup>.

Adaptation solutions requiring adjustment in natural or human systems in response to the actual and expected climate change and its effects, are needed to moderate harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.
## Short-term sectoral and adaptation solutions

To address the challenges in water-scarce regions like the Mediterranean Basin adaptation measures are often designed in silo. However, sectoral adaptation solutions can degrade even more the nexus components and generate feedback loops with the drivers of change, here climate change, for instance resulting in increased greenhouse gas emissions and reduced adaptation capacity in the longer term (Fig. 1, right-hand side).

In the case of water, the reduction in water tables may lead to responses focused on pumping ground water for drinking or irrigation that require energy, can increase salinization and seawater intrusion, which ultimately degrade water quality⁵². The high energy requirements for pumping water drive up costs and, when insufficient renewable energies are available, greenhouse gas emissions. Simultaneously, ecosystems that depend on stable water levels—like wetlands and riparian zones—deteriorate, reducing their capacity to provide critical services such as carbon sequestration, water purification, and flood control. The degradation of these ecosystems, in turn, destabilizes soil quality and local microclimates, further compounding water stress.

Enhancing food production through conventional intensive agriculture requires synthetic fertilizers which production is highly energy intensive, with negative impacts on both climate change and energy security, through increased greenhouse gas emissions and energy demand³³,⁵⁴. Also, chemical fertilization risks polluting water with high nitrogen loads, impacting negatively ecosystem's health and food security⁵⁵. Where irrigation needs are satisfied through groundwater, the cascading effects described above are also added.

Photovoltaic and wind-based renewable energy adoption to phase-out fossil fuels requires land which can lead to conflict with other usage such as agriculture, leading to lower food security and ecosystem's health⁵⁶,⁵⁷. Energy efficiency improvement, if not accompanied by measures promoting energy sufficiency, can result in rebound effects, leading to an increase in energy demand and negative impact on energy security and climate change. These cascading effects interact across scales, and applying sectoral adaptation measures creates feedback loops that amplify the original stressors.

## Favouring synergies in the cascade with a nexus approach

In the Mediterranean region, water scarcity is a defining and intensifying challenge. Most studies place water at the core of the nexus-oriented approaches in the region, reflecting the Mediterranean's chronic water scarcity and the strong interdependence of water with energy and food production⁵⁸. Implementing an integrated nexus model that places water at its core in the Mediterranean basin can help mitigate trade-offs among sectors, enhance climate adaptation strategies, and promote sustainable development through region-specific policy actions and technological and social innovation⁵⁸⁻⁶⁰. Promoting synergies among the WEFE components and the drivers of change requires innovative, comprehensive, and context-sensitive interventions using a nexus approach. A fundamental shift from sectoral approaches that address water, energy, food, and ecosystems independently, to measures recognizing the interconnected nature of these systems and policies that consider their complex interactions, is essential. Several organisations, like the European Union, the World Bank, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the International Water Association, the USAID, among others, have launched initiatives to build mechanisms for supporting the WEFE nexus approach at various levels⁶¹. Several adaptation options implemented in the Mediterranean region have been identified that address at least two components of the WEFE and later evaluated them from a nexus perspective⁵⁸.

## Nexus based solutions implemented in the Mediterranean for integrated resource use

Building resilience across the WEFE components starts with investing in adaptive technologies and sustainable practices and behaviours that can deliver nexus outcomes. The review of those solutions and practices in the Mediterranean (see Methodoloy section and Supplementary note for their

selection and processing), show at territorial level, both ecosystem-based⁶²,⁶³ and technological solutions have been implemented locally for more integrated and efficient resource use⁶⁴⁻⁶⁷ (Fig. 2a). These solutions, addressing at least 2 components of the WEFE, have been implemented accros the Mediterranean basin with a clear North-South divide (Fig. 2b). However, not all implemented solutions are documented in scientific articles or reports, so the map is necessarily incomplete.

A number of WEFE-solutions support the food system sustainability while minimizing water and energy demand⁶⁸⁻⁷². They include both new irrigation techniques and the recovery of traditional ones; the use of renewable energy in agriculture, agrivoltaics without land competition or bio-energy crop production in marginal areas or for self-consumption in agriculture; the use of reclaimed water or desalinated water; or agroecological practices, such as agroforestry, intercropping and cover crops⁴⁸,⁶⁵,⁷³. A large fraction of water is currently used for cooling thermal power plants, so more efficient cooling technologies are critical for the water-energy supply-demand balance²¹,⁷⁴. Switching to renewable energies in the Mediterranean also benefits the water, ecosystem, food and energy pillars so that implementation does not involve land competition and resource degradation⁶⁴,⁶⁵,⁷⁵,⁷⁶. Finally, the WEFE nexus allows to better distinguish potential synergies or conflicts between sectoral policies because it provides a framework in which the role of ecosystem services are more explicit⁷⁷. Consumption-oriented solutions, such as returning to a more Mediterranean diet (and its subsequent reduction in meat consumption) and, in general, less wasteful consumption, have high potential for adaptation and mitigation with benefits in all WEFE components⁷⁸,⁷⁹. Finally, early warning tools and climate services, have also shown broad applicability across various sectors in the Mediterranean⁸⁰. The combination of nexus approaches with climate service studies in the Mediterranean have contributed to the assessment of cross-sectoral impacts of hydro-climatic and socio-economic futures on water resources, habitat for species and food and energy production⁵⁷,⁸¹⁻⁸³.

In analysing the relevance of the identified solutions from a nexus perspective, we find that options related to water use and management are the most complex and controversial, because they must account for benefits and trade-offs across multiple WEFE components, rather than focusing narrowly on a single sector. The literature collected from Mediterranean case studies shows that only a few measures can be regarded as consistently “positive” across all four nexus dimensions, which limits their transformative potential (Fig. 2a). On the contrary, social options based on behavioural change show the highest positive effect on all the four components of the nexus, with a robust amount of evidence, and are therefore the most transformative⁸⁴⁻⁸⁹. These approaches, which include shifts in consumption patterns, sustainable resource use, and community-driven initiatives, not only reduce environmental pressures but also foster long-term resilience by reshaping societal norms and promoting more sustainable lifestyles. More evidence is needed to assess specific ecosystem-based solutions although currently available studies indicate that nature-based solutions and agroecological management have positive impacts on the four WEFE components. Finally, more evidence is needed to assess the effect of adaptation options related to governance and institutions, in particular on policies on water pricing and limiting, or better managing water use⁹⁰,⁹¹. It is important to note that the scientific literature remains unequally distributed across the Mediterranean. Southern and Eastern countries, in particular, face underrepresentation, partly due to limited research funding and language barriers. Many locally implemented solutions—especially indigenous or informal practices—are underreported, highlighting the need for more inclusive and regionally balanced documentation. For example, traditional canalization systems used for date cultivation in the Atlas oases of Morocco have been implemented for millennia to optimize food production while also improving water quality and distribution without requiring energy inputs. However, such practices are scarcely analysed in the international literature and remain absent from peer-reviewed references. This reflects a broader challenge: locally implemented solutions are poorly comparable across countries due to the lack of harmonized and easily accessible
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** | Impacts and distribution of implemented WEFE nexus solutions in Mediterranean countries. **a** Assessment of the main impacts and trade-offs of WEFE nexus adaptation and mitigation solutions implemented in the Mediterranean countries. The link is made to the SDGs through the nexus pillars. Each pillar has two columns indicating positive impacts (left) and risks or trade-offs (right) associated with the solution. The amount of evidence is quantified by the number of articles used (in</figcaption></figure>

brackets) for assessing each solution, and categorised by robustness: limited, medium, or robust (shades of brown). Four degrees of agreement measures the consensus between the articles. This figure does not review all possible solutions, but those implemented in the Mediterranean, reported in the scientific literature, and assessed in this study. **b** Spatial distribution of implemented WEFE nexus solutions based on a review of 205 articles (see Supplementary note). Selected solutions address at least 2 of the 4 WEFE components.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** | Same as Fig. 1 for solutions designed in a nexus approach.</figcaption></figure>

documentation, which is often confined to regional or municipal sources. Beyond these considerations, collaborative pools of experts convened through the MedECC process, or other existing initiatives such as the PRIMA (Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area) program represent a potential asset for advancing nexus approaches in the region. This scientific network and community of practice can strengthen dialogue, cooperation, and policy coherence across countries, and help foster widely acceptable and transnationally applicable WEFE solutions.

## Impact of nexus-based solutions on the cascading effects of climate change on WEFE components

Climate change can affect the effectiveness of adaptation and mitigation measures at various temporal and spatial scales. When solutions are developed in a holistic or a nexus approach, which take into consideration the interactions shown before, more synergies and less trade-offs can lead to mitigating feedback loops that may reverse the negative trends caused by climate change on all WEFE components (Fig. 3, right-hand side). Wastewater treatment, sludge valorization, water conservation, agroecology and consumption changes have successfully been implemented in the Mediterranean with positive cascading effects on the WEFE components (Fig. 2a). Irrigation with treated wastewater favours the valorization of sludge, they both reduce pollution by minimising the use of synthetic fertilisers and treating polluted water, promoting not only water security, but also ecosystem health⁹²,⁹³. Sludge, used as organic fertiliser, also increases soil organic carbon and thus favours carbon sequestration with positive impacts on climate change mitigation, and increases soil fertility, which contributes to improved yields and thus increase food security⁹⁴. Agroecological practices also reduce pesticide use, increase biodiversity, and promote water conservation, with positive outcomes on ecosystem health and food security⁹⁵. The energy transition towards renewable sources, implemented

through spatial planning and citizen participation, enable co-usage of land, with positive impacts on energy security and ecosystem health. Finally, actions aiming at reducing water consumption, reduce energy demand and thus, greenhouse gas emissions. These adaptation measures reverse the feedback loop of the sectoral approaches that further deteriorate water and energy resources, food and ecosystem health and amplifies climate change, into a positive feedback loop among WEFE components (Fig. 3, left-hand side) that also mitigates climate change (Fig. 3, right-hand side).

The review provides clear evidence that there is a critical lack of complete and disaggregated data on the components of the WEFE nexus in the Mediterranean region. Even where data exist, they are often inconsistent or not comparable. Additionally, restrictions imposed by certain authorities on access to specific types of observations further hinder comprehensive assessments. Despite these limitations, the available data do allow for an assessment of nexus initiatives. However, a broader evaluation of their overall impact and the full realization of the WEFE nexus approach would require systematic and harmonized data collection to ensure consistency, accuracy, and accessibility⁶⁸,⁹⁶⁻⁹⁸. Addressing these gaps is a prerequisite for fostering nexus solutions, and could be advanced by the adoption of common standards, the exchange of information across countries, and the promotion of international coordination and transnational projects. One concrete step in this direction is the EU requirement that all EU-funded projects deposit their data and materials in ZENODO, a general-purpose open research repository. Projects also involving non-EU Mediterranean countries would improve data comparability and availability, thereby enabling more robust and actionable nexus-based policymaking.

## Conclusion

In the water-scarce Mediterranean basin, climate change negatively affects WEFE components both separately and through the cascading effects resulting from the interactions among them. Silo approaches contribute to
amplify the negative impacts while nexus-based technological, ecosystem-
based and behavioural solutions enhance synergies within the interactions
among WEFE components and climate change, while at the same time
reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fostering carbon storage. A more
quantitative approach is needed to assess to what extent nexus approaches
can break the chain of cascading detrimental effects of climate change and
how much the different strategies contribute to enhance those synergies.
This would help identify the most efficient options, selecting those strategies
that have higher positive impacts in the different WEFE components in
different contexts. Model-based nexus approach assessments, or based on
different climate, socio-economic and demographic change scenarios may
help assessing the resilience level of adaptation measure options and avoid
maladaptation and unanticipated effects when changing variables in the
system. This should be considered when designing integrated policies<sup>74,99-102</sup>.
To safeguard the Mediterranean's future, policymakers, researchers, and
stakeholders must prioritise integrated, data-informed strategies that
leverage the transformative potential of nature-based and equitable con-
sumptive solutions.

The WEFE nexus finally offers a powerful integrative framework for
addressing the interdependencies among water, energy, food systems, and
ecosystems—resources that are fundamental to human development and
ecological stability and reduces the risks of sectoral Sustainable Develop-
ment Goal (SDG)<sup>103,104</sup>. In the context of the water scarce Mediterranean
Basin, achieving SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation for all) is of particular
urgency where water stress poses a critical barrier to progress across multiple
SDGs, and particularly SDG 2 (zero hunger), SDG 7 (affordable and clean
energy), SDG 13 (climate action), SDG 14 (life below water) and SDG 15
(life on land)<sup>23</sup>.

The Mediterranean Basin's experience is highly relevant beyond the
region itself. Other Mediterranean-type climate regions —including Cali-
fornia, central Chile, the Cape Region of South Africa, and southwestern
Australia—share distinctive features such as hot, dry summers, cool, wet
winters, high biodiversity, and long histories of intensive
human-environment interactions¹⁰⁵. These regions face similar challenges
of water scarcity, ecological stress, and land-use pressures¹⁰⁶. Recent analyses
also show that Mediterranean-type climate regions exhibit comparable
climate dynamics, including variability in rainfall, drought frequency, and
temperature extremes¹⁰⁷. Such commonalities in climate, ecosystems, and
human systems suggest that the nexus challenges highlighted here for the
Mediterranean—particularly persistent water scarcity, rebound effects from
technological fixes, and fragmented governance—are equally relevant in
other Mediterranean-type climate regions. As such, the Mediterranean
provides a valuable reference point for designing nexus-based strategies that
can be adapted to enhance resilience in water-scarce regions worldwide.

Methodology

An open call for Mediterranean experts across the four domains of the WEFE
nexus was initiated by the Mediterranean Experts on Climate and environ-
mental Change (MedECC) network, inviting a diverse pool of candidates to
apply. A selection committee composed of senior experts from various dis-
ciplines and countries within the region then evaluated and selected authors
based on criteria ensuring geographic, sectoral, expertise, and gender balance.
To refine the scope and objectives, a series of digital workshops were held to
facilitate interdisciplinary discussions. Following this, a designated team—
supervised by senior experts—was tasked with systematically identifying,
reviewing, and synthesizing relevant literature within each domain. The
review began with a clear definition of its objectives: to identify the key
climatic changes and assess their impacts on the water-energy-food-
ecosystems (WEFE) sectors, with particular attention to cascading effects.
A systematic literature search was conducted using academic databases
including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on peer-
reviewed articles. The search strategy combined keywords related to climate
change, sector-specific impacts (water, energy, food, ecosystems), and
interlinkages between sectors. For interlinkages, only studies addressing at
least two nexus domains were included. Articles that were purely theoretical

and lacked empirical evidence were excluded. Screening was conducted in
two stages: first at the level of titles and abstracts to remove irrelevant studies,
and then through full-text reviews to ensure relevance, rigor, and quality. For
adaptation and mitigation solutions, Scopus and Web of Science were again
used as source databases, with keywords including “WEFE nexus”, “Medi-
terranean”, “adaptation”, and “mitigation.” Given the relatively limited lit-
erature explicitly framed in terms of WEFE, we also considered studies
dealing with integrated water resources management (IWRM) or other
sectoral approaches when they addressed interconnections with additional
nexus sectors. Selected papers were required to present an empirical assess-
ment of implemented options in the Mediterranean context (see Supple-
mentary note for more details on the review and categorization method). To
assess the robustness of the findings, the number of papers evaluating a
specific measure (amount of evidence) and the degree of consistency among
them (level of agreement) were examined. The amount of evidence available
is quantified by the number of articles addressing the specific topic investi-
gated. The degree of agreement measures the consensus on the given topic. It
is assessed from the fraction of articles that agree on the results (see Sup-
plementary Table SM5). The terms for evidence are limited, medium, or
robust. The terms for the degree of agreement are low, medium, or high. For
findings with ‘high agreement’ and ‘robust evidence’, a level of confidence is
given, as well as for findings with ‘high agreement’ or ‘robust evidence’. The
assessment of complexity and transformative potential was based on the
published Mediterranean literature evaluating specific adaptation and miti-
gation measures. Solutions that showed trade-offs or mixed outcomes across
components were classified as complex or controversial, while those con-
sistently generating positive effects across the four nexus components were
classified as transformative. The resulting categorization is illustrated in Fig. 2,
which shows that while some solutions targeted all four nexus components,
others were more narrowly focused on a subset of them.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Received: 10 June 2025; Accepted: 3 November 2025;

Published online: 16 December 2025

References

1. Aragüés, R. et al. Soil salinity related to physical soil characteristics and irrigation management in four Mediterranean irrigation districts. *Agric. Water Manag.* **98**, 959–966 (2011).

2. Cherif, S. et al. *Drivers of change*. In *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 59–180 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, 2020).

3. MedECC. *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 632 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, 2020).

4. Ali, E. et al. Cross-Chapter Paper 4: Mediterranean Region. In *Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change* (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 2232–2272 (Cambridge University Press, 2022).

5. Giorgi, F. Climate change hot-spots. *Geophys. Res. Lett.* **33**, L08707 (2006).

6. Tramblay, Y. et al. Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios. *Earth Sci. Rev.* **210**, 103348 (2020).

7. Essa, Y. H., Hirschi, M., Thiery, W., El-Kenawy, A. M. & Yang, C. Drought characteristics in Mediterranean under future climate change. *npj Clim. Atmos.* **6**, 133 (2023).

8. Stathi, E., Kastridis, A. & Myronidis, D. Analysis of hydrometeorological trends and drought severity in water-
demanding Mediterranean islands under climate change conditions. *Climate* **11**, 106 (2023).

9. Christidis, N. & Stott, P. A. Anthropogenic climate change and the record-high temperature of May 2020 in Western Europe. *Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.* **103**, S33-S37 (2022).

10. Jézequel, A., Faranda, D., Drobinski, P. & Lionello P. Extreme event attribution in the Mediterranean. *Int. J. Climatol.* https://doi.org/10. 1002/joc.8799 (2025).

11. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In *Climate Change The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change* (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 3–32 (Cambridge University Press, 2021).

12. Mrabet, R. et al. In *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 237–264 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/ MAP, 2020).

13. Drobinski, P. et al. Energy transition in the Mediterranean. In *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 265–322 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, 2020).

14. MedECC. Interlinking climate change with the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) nexus in the Mediterranean Basin (eds Drobinski, P. et al.) MedECC Reports, 264 (MedECC Secretariat, 2024).

15. Cramer, W. et al. Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean. *Nat. Clim. Chang.* **8**, 972–980 (2018).

16. Ammari, T. G. et al. Soil salinity changes in the Jordan valley. potentially threaten sustainable irrigated agriculture. *Pedosphere* **23**, 376–384 (2013).

17. CESE. Nexus eau-énergie-alimentation-écosystèmes: Optimiser les ressources naturelles, maximiser les synergies et réduire les risques intersectoriels au Maroc. *Avis du Conseil Economique, Social et Environnemental, auto-saisine* 79/2024 (in French - Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems Nexus: Optimizing Natural Resources, Maximizing Synergies, and Reducing Cross-Sectoral Risks in Morocco. *Opinion of the Economic, Social and Environmental Council, Self-Referral* 79/2024). https://www.cese.ma/media/2025/ 02/ASA-C1-79-f.pdf (2024).

18. Testa, R., Tudisca, S., Schifani, G., Di Trapani, A. M. & Migliore, G. Tropical fruits as an opportunity for sustainable development in rural areas: The case of mango in small-sized Sicilian farms. *Sustainability* **10**, 1436 (2018).

19. Berbel, J., Expósito, A., Gutiérrez-Martin, C. & Mateos, L. Effects of the irrigation modernization in Spain 2002–2015. *Water Resour. Manag.* **33**, 1835–1849 (2019).

20. Berbel, J. & Mateos, L. Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model. *Agric. Syst.* **128**, 25–34 (2014).

21. Harmanny, K. S. & Malek, Ž (2019). Adaptations in irrigated agriculture in the Mediterranean region: An overview and spatial analysis of implemented strategies. *Reg. Environ. Change* **19**, 1401–1416 (2019).

22. Daher, B., Hamie, S., Pappas, K. & Roth, J. Examining Lebanson's resilience through a water-energy-food nexus lens. *Front. Sustain. Food Syst.* **6**, 748343 (2022).

23. UN. UN Water Conference. Summary of Proceedings by the President of the General Assembly. https://sdgs.un.org/sites/ default/files/2023-05/FINAL%20EDITED%20-%20PGA77% 20Summary%20for%20Water%20Conference%202023.pdf (2023).

24. Fader, M. et al. Water. In *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 181–236 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/ MAP, 2020).

25. Baggio, G., Qadir, M. & Smakhtin, V. Freshwater availability status across countries for human and ecosystem needs. *Sci. Total Environ.* **792**, 148230 (2021).

26. Vinci, G. et al. The Health of the Water Planet: Challenges and Opportunities in the Mediterranean Area. An Overview. *Earth* **2**, 894–919 (2021).

27. Zapata-Sierra, A. J., Zapata-Castillo, L. & Manzano-Aguugliaro, F. Water resources availability in southern Europe at the basin scale in response to climate change scenarios. *Environ. Sci. Eur.* **34**, 75 (2022).

28. FAO. Regional initiative on water scarcity for the Near East and North Africa (WSI). Regional Initiative on Water Scarcity, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 36 pp. https://www. fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/rne/docs/WSI-Pamphlet-en.pdf (2022).

29. Burak, S. & Margat, J. Water management in the Mediterranean region: concepts and policies. *Water Resour. Manag.* **30**, 5779–5797 (2016).

30. Dernini, S. et al. Med Diet 4.0: The Mediterranean diet with four sustainable benefits. *Public Health Nutr.* **20**, 1322–1330 (2017).

31. FAO & CIHEAM. Mediterranean food consumption patterns: Diet, environment, society, economy and health. https://www.fao.org/3/ i4358e/i4358e.pdf (2015).

32. Ponti, L., Gutierrez, A. P., Boggia, A. & Neteler, M. Analysis of Grape Production in the Face of Climate Change. *Climate* **6**, 20 (2018).

33. Alrteimei, H. A., Ash'aari, Z. H. & Muharram, F. M. Last decade assessment of the impacts of regional climate change on crop yield variations in the Mediterranean region. *Agriculture* **12**, 1787 (2022).

34. Kaniewski, D. et al. Climate change threatens olive oil production in the Levant. *Nat. Plants* **9**, 219–227 (2023).

35. Kaniewski, D. et al. Olive production in the 21st century will be threatened by water stress and declining solar activity. *Commun. Earth Environ.* **6**, 268 (2025).

36. Yang, H., Wang, L. & Zehnder, A. J. B. Water scarcity and food trade in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean countries. *Food Policy* **32**, 585–605 (2007).

37. Duarte, R., Pinilla, V. & Serrano, A. The globalization of Mediterranean agriculture: A long-term view of the impact on water consumption. *Ecol. Econ.* **183**, 106964 (2021).

38. Daher, B., Bachour, R., Yanni, S. F., Koo-Oshima, S. & Mohtar, R. H. Corrigendum: Food security under compound shocks: Can Lebanon produce its own Mediterranean food basket. *Front. Sustain. Food Syst.* **6**, 969248 (2023).

39. Lee, S. H., Mohtar, R. H. & Yoo, S. H. Assessment of food trade impacts on water, food, and land security in the MENA region. *Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.* **23**, 557–572 (2019).

40. Palatnik, R. R., Raviv, O., Sirot, J. & Shechter, M. Water scarcity and food security in the mediterranean region: The role of alternative water sources and controlled-environment agriculture. *Water Resour. Econ.* **49**, 100256 (2025).

41. Baer-Nawrocka, A. & Sadowski, A. Food security and food self-sufficiency around the world: A typology of countries. *PLoS One* **14**, e0213448 (2019).

42. Abu Hatab, A. & Hess, S. Feed the Mouth, the Eye Ashamed: Have food prices triggered social unrest in Egypt? *The 31st International Conference of Agricultural Economists*, 17–31. https://pub.epsilon. slu.se/26839/1/abu_hatab_a_et_al_220127.pdf (2021).

43. Arzaghi, M. & Squalli, J. The environmental impact of fossil fuel subsidy policies. *Energy Econ.* **126**, 106980 (2023).
44. European Commission. Fossil fuel subsidies in EU Member States: Trends and analytical challenges. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/fossil-fuel-subsidies-eu-member-states-trends-and-analytical-challenges_en (2023).

45. Pariente-David, S. & Drobinski, P. Renewable energy in the Mediterranean: Pathways for multilateral cooperation. In *Climate Change and Security in the Mediterranean: Understanding the Nexus, Unpacking International Policy Responses* (eds Dessi, A. & Fusco, F.) 111–146 (New Med Research Network, 2022). https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iairs_9.pdf.

46. Moretti, A., Pitas, C., Christofi, G., Bué, E. & Francescato, M. G. Grid integration as a strategy of Med-TSO in the Mediterranean area in the framework of climate change and energy transition. *Energies* **13**, 5307 (2020).

47. Pulighe, G. et al. Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions. *Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.* **103**, 58–70 (2019).

48. Sargentis, G. F. et al. Agricultural land or photovoltaic parks? The water-energy-food nexus and land development perspectives in the Thessaly plain, Greece. *Sustainability* **13**, 8935 (2021).

49. Balzan, M. V. et al. Ecosystems. In *Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report* (eds Cramer, W., Guiot, J. & Marini, K.) 323–468 (Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, 2020).

50. Aurelle, D. et al. Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation in the Mediterranean. *Ecosphere* **13**, e3915 (2022).

51. del Pozo, A. et al. Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies of agriculture in Mediterranean-climate regions (MCRs). *Sustainability* **11**, 2769 (2019).

52. Mastrocicco, M., Gervasio, M. P., Busico, G. & Colombani, N. Natural and anthropogenic factors driving groundwater resources salinization for agriculture use in the Campania plains (Southern Italy). *Sci. Total Environ.* **758**, 144033 (2021).

53. Harchaoui, S. & Chatzimpiros, P. Energy, nitrogen, and farm surplus transitions in agriculture from historical data modeling. France, 1882–2013. *J. Ind. Ecol.* **23**, 412–425 (2019).

54. Aguilera, E. et al. Long-term trajectories of the C footprint of N fertilization in Mediterranean agriculture (Spain, 1860–2018). *Environ. Res. Lett.* **16**, 85010 (2021).

55. Sanz-Cobena, A. et al. Fertilization strategies for abating N pollution at the scale of a highly vulnerable and diverse semi-arid agricultural region (Murcia, Spain). *Environ. Res. Lett.* **18**, 064030 (2023).

56. Nøland, J. K., Auxepaules, J., Rousset, A., Perney, B. & Falletti, G. Spatial energy density of large-scale electricity generation from power sources worldwide. *Sci. Rep.* **12**, 21280 (2022).

57. Maimó-Far, A., Tantet, A., Homar, V. & Drobinski, P. The trade-off between socio-environmental awareness and renewable penetration targets in energy transition roadmaps. *Appl. Energy* **355**, 122397 (2024).

58. Lucca, E. et al. A review of water-energy-food-ecosystems nexus research in the Mediterranean: evolution, gaps and applications. *Environ. Res. Lett.* **18**, 083001 (2023).

59. Bazilian, M. et al. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. *Energy Policy* **39**, 7896–7906 (2011).

60. Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E. & Nilsson, M. Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance. *Glob. Environ. Change* **45**, 165–173 (2017).

61. Aboelnga, H. T., Khalifa, M., McNamara, I., Ribbe, L. & Sycz, J. Water-energy-food nexus literature review. A review of nexus literature and ongoing nexus initiatives for policymakers. In *Nexus Regional Dialogue Programme (NRD) and German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ)*. Nexus Regional Dialogue

Programme (NRD) and German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ). https://uploads.water-energy-food.org/legacy/wef_nexus_literature_review.pdf (2018).

62. Aguilera, E. et al. Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review. *Agr. Syst.* **181**, 102809 (2020).

63. Almenar, J. B. et al. Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. *Land Use Policy* **100**, 104898 (2021).

64. Malagó, A. et al. C. An analytical framework to assess SDG targets within the context of WEFE nexus in the Mediterranean region. *Resour. Conserv. Recycl.* **164**, 105205 (2021).

65. Karabulut, A. A., Udias, A. & Vigiak, O. Assessing the policy scenarios for the ecosystem water food energy (EWFE) nexus in the Mediterranean region. *Ecosyst. Serv.* **35**, 231–240 (2019).

66. Hoff, H. et al. A nexus approach for the MENA Region – From concept to knowledge to action. *Front. Environ. Sci.* **7**, 48 (2019).

67. De Roo, A. et al. The water-energy-food-ecosystem nexus in the Mediterranean: Current issues and future challenges. *Front. Clim.* **3**, 782553 (2021).

68. Saladini, F. et al. Linking the water-energy-food nexus and sustainable development indicators for the Mediterranean region. *Ecol. Indic.* **91**, 689–697 (2018).

69. Daccache, A., Ciurana, J. S., Rodriguez Diaz, J. A. & Knox, J. W. Water and energy footprint of irrigated agriculture in the Mediterranean region. *Environ. Res. Lett.* **9**, 124014 (2014).

70. El Gafy, I., Gigg, N. & Reagan, W. Dynamic behaviour of the water-food-energy-nexus: Focus on crop production and consumption. *Irrig. Drain.* **66**, 19–33 (2016).

71. Espinosa-Tasón, J., Berbel, J. & Gutiérrez-Martín, C. Energized water: Evolution of water-energy nexus in the Spanish irrigated agriculture, 1950–2017. *Agric. Water Manag.* **233**, 106073 (2020).

72. Huang, W., Liu, Q. & Abu Hatab, A. Is the technical efficiency green? The environmental efficiency of agricultural production in the MENA region. *J. Environ. Manag.* **327**, 116820 (2023).

73. Kalavrouziotis, I. K. et al. Current status in wastewater treatment, reuse and research in some Mediterranean countries. *Desalin. Water Treat.* **53**, 2015–2030 (2015).

74. van Vliet, M. T. H., Wiberg, D., Leduc, S. & Riahi, K. Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources. *Nat. Clim. Chang.* **6**, 676–681 (2016).

75. Greg, A. et al. Agrivoltaics provide mutual benefits across the food-energy-water nexus in drylands. *Nat. Sustain.* **2**, 848–855 (2019).

76. Lim, J., Abillama, N. & D'Adamo, C. Climate resilience is key to energy transitions in the Middle East and North Africa. IEA commentary. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/climate-resilience-is-key-to-energy-transitions-in-the-middle-east-and-north-africa (2023).

77. Papadopoulou, C. A., Papadopoulou, M. P. & Laspidou, C. Implementing water-energy-land- food-climate nexus approach to achieve the sustainable development goals in Greece: Indicators and policy recommendations. *Sustainability* **14**, 4100 (2022).

78. Capone, R., El Bilali, H., Debs, P., Cardone, G. & Driouech, N. Mediterranean food consumption patterns sustainability: setting up a common ground for future research and action. *Am. J. Food Sci. Nutr.* **1**, 37–52 (2014).

79. García, S. et al. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and adherence to Mediterranean diet in an adult population: the Mediterranean diet index as a pollution level index. *Environ. Health* **22**, 1 (2023).

80. Sánchez-García, E. et al. Co-design of sectoral climate services based on seasonal prediction information in the Mediterranean. *Clim. Serv.* **28**, 100337 (2022).

81. Koutroulis, A. G., Grillakis, M. G., Daliakopoulos, I. N., Tsanis, I. K. & Jacob, D. Cross sectoral impacts on water availability at +2°C
and +3°C for east Mediterranean island states: The case of Crete. *J. Hydrol.* **532**, 16–28 (2016).

82. Terrado, M., Sabater, S. & Acuña, V. Identifying regions vulnerable to habitat degradation under future irrigation scenarios. *Environ. Res. Lett.* **11**, 114025 (2016).

83. Dell'Aquila, A. et al. Monitoring climate related risk and opportunities for the wine sector: the MED-GOLD pilot service. *Clim. Serv.* **30**, 100346 (2023).

84. Vanham, D., Guenther, S., Ros-Baró, M. & Bach-Faig, A. Which diet has the lower water footprint in Mediterranean countries?. *Resour. Conserv. Recycling* **171**, 105631 (2021).

85. Bôto, J. M., Rocha, A., Miguéis, V., Meireles, M. & Neto, B. Sustainability dimensions of the Mediterranean diet: A systematic review of the indicators used and its results. *Adv. Nutr.* **13**, 2015–2038 (2022).

86. Galli, A. et al. Mediterranean countries' food consumption and sourcing patterns: An Ecological Footprint viewpoint. *Sci. Total Environ.* **578**, 383–391 (2017).

87. Belgacem, W., Mattas, K., Arampatzis, G. & Baourakis, G. Changing dietary behavior for better biodiversity preservation: A preliminary study. *Nutrients* **13**, 2076 (2021).

88. Berry, E. M. Sustainable food systems and the Mediterranean diet. *Nutrients* **11**, 2229 (2019).

89. Preedy, V. R. & Watson, R. R. (eds). *The Mediterranean Diet - An Evidence-based Approach* (Academic Press, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03968-7.

90. Molle, F. & Sanchis-Ibor, C. Irrigation policies in the Mediterranean: Trends and challenges. In *Irrigation in the Mediterranean. Global Issues in Water Policy*. (eds Molle, F., Sanchis-Ibor, C. & Avellà-Reus, L.) vol. 22 (Springer, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03698-0_10.

91. Martin-Rios, C., Rogenhofer, J. & Sandoval Alvarado, M. The true cost of food waste: Tackling the managerial challenges of the food supply chain. *Trends Food Sci. Technol.* **131**, 190–195 (2023).

92. Elbana, T. A., Bakr, N. & Elbana, M. Reuse of treated wastewater in Egypt: Challenges and opportunities. In *Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt*. In *The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry*. *The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry* (ed Negm, A.) 75 (Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_46.

93. Aguilera, E. et al. Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. *A Rev. Agric. Syst.* **181**, 102809 (2020).

94. Abdel Monem, M. et al. *Towards Climate-smart Agriculture in Egypt – Scaling up Sustainable Practices for Enhancing Agrifood System Resilience and Adaptive Capacity*. pp. 92 (FAO, 2022).

95. Kalavrouziotis, I. K. et al. Current status in wastewater treatment, reuse and research in some mediterranean countries. *Desalin. Water Treat.* **53**, 2015–2030 (2015).

96. Laspidou, C. S., Mellios, N. K., Spyropoulou, A. E., Kofinas, D. T. & Papadopoulou, M. P. Systems thinking on the resource nexus: Modeling and visualisation tools to identify critical interlinkages for resilient and sustainable societies and institutions. *Sci. Total Environ.* **717**, 137264 (2020).

97. Lawford, R. G. A design for a data and information service to address the knowledge needs of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) Nexus and strategies to facilitate its implementation. *Front. Environ. Sci.* **7**, 56 (2019).

98. Markantonis, V. et al. Can the implementation of the water-energy-food nexus support economic growth in the Mediterranean region? The current status and the way forward. *Front. Environ. Sci.* **7**, 84 (2019).

99. Rapella, L. et al. Simulating generic agrivoltaic systems with ORCHIDEE: Model development and multi-case study insights. *Agric. Meteorol.* **371**, 110589 (2025).

100. Khan, Z., Linares, P. & García-González, J. Adaptation to climate-induced regional water constraints in the Spanish energy sector: An integrated assessment. *Energy Policy* **97**, 123–135 (2016).

101. Fader, M., Shi, S., von Bloh, W., Bondeau, A. & Cramer, W. Mediterranean irrigation under climate change: more efficient irrigation needed to compensate for increases in irrigation water requirements. *Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.* **20**, 953–973 (2016).

102. Kebede, A. S., Nicholls, R. J., Clarke, D., Savin, C. & Harrison, P. A. Integrated assessment of the food-water-land-ecosystems nexus in Europe: Implications for sustainability. *Sci. Total Environ.* **768**, 144461 (2021).

103. Nath, P. K. & Behera, B. A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies. *Environ. Dev. Sustain.* **13**, 141–162 (2011).

104. Adamovic, M. et al. *Position Paper on Water, Energy, Food and Ecosystem (WEFE) Nexus and Sustainable development Goals* (SDGs) (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65520-3_2.

105. Newbigin, M. I. The Mediterranean climatic type: Its world distribution and the human response. *South Afr. Geographical J.* **12**, 14–22 (1929).

106. Aschmann, H. Distribution and peculiarity of Mediterranean ecosystems. In *Mediterranean Type Ecosystems. Ecological Studies* (eds Di Castri, F. & Mooney, H. A.) Vol. 7. (Springer, 1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65520-3_2.

107. Seager, R. et al. Climate variability and change of Mediterranean-type climates. *J. Clim.* **32**, 2887–2915 (2019).

## Acknowledgements

This work is a contribution of Mediterranean Experts on Climate and environmental Change (MedECC), open and independent international scientific expert network founded in 2015 and providing information to decision-makers and the general public on the basis of available scientific information and on-going research on the climate and environmental changes impacts in the Mediterranean basin. Appropriate interactions between MedECC and decision-makers and stakeholders are developed, through a relevant science-policy interface built mainly on a close collaboration with Plan Bleu - Regional Activity Centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP) and the Union for the Mediterranean. This paper has benefited from discussions with T. Abdelhakim (Egypt), E. Aguilera (Spain), H. Allal (France/Tunisa), N. Ait-Mouheb (France), J. Badosa (France/Spain), M. Bahlali (France), T. Berchoux (France), O. Bessaoud (Algeria), F.J. Bonet Garcia (Spain), C. Branquinho (Portugal), Y. Brouziyne (Morocco), J. El Jeitany (Italy), A. Gain (Australia), J.C. Gattacceca (France), H. Ghazi (Morocco), M.A. Gros-Rosanvallon (France), I. La Jeunesse (France), J. Lorenzo-Lacruz (Spain), E. Lucca (Italy), F. Lupia (Italy), K. Marini (France), S. Marras (Italy), H. Mastouri (Morocco), I. Mekki (Tunisia), E. Menichetti (France/Italy), V. Mereu (Italy), R. Mrabet (Morocco), J. Penca (Slovenia), A. Perez-Porro (Spain), T. Pirelli (Italy), G. Pulighe (Italy), A. Queralt Bassa (Spain), L. Rapella (Italy/France), A. Rhouma (Spain), M. Safwa (Hungary/Syria), A. Sanz-Cobena (Spain), M. Satorras (Spain), F. Schuenemann (Germany), M. Terrado (Spain), G. Vaglietti (France), G. Zaimes (Greece), S.F. Zanini (Italy). It was supported by the Energy4-Climate Interdisciplinary Centre (E4C), as part of the 3rd Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-18-EUR-0006-02].

## Author contributions

P. Drobinski, M.G. Rivera Ferre and M. Abdel Monem developed the assessment protocol and convened the author team; all authors contributed sectoral knowledge and text; P. Drobinski and M.G. Rivera Ferre wrote the paper.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
**Additional information**

**Supplementary information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00308-4.

**Correspondence** and requests for materials should be addressed to Philippe Drobinski.

**Reprints and permissions information** is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints

**Publisher's note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2025

<footnote n="1">¹Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique-Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Palaiseau, France. ²Energy4Climate Interdisciplinary Center, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Ecole des Ponts, CNRS, CEA, Palaiseau, France. ³INGENIO, (CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València), Valencia, Spain. ⁴Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority & Regional Office for the Near East and North Africa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. ⁵Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. ⁶The Nordic Africa Institute, Uppsala, Sweden. ⁷Economic Social and Environmental Council (CESE), Rabat, Morocco. ⁸Center for Environment, Human Security & Governance (CERES), Agadir, Morocco. ⁹International Water Research Institute, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco. ¹⁰Mediterranean Institute for Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE), Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD Avignon University, Aix-en-Provence, France. ¹¹CMCC Foundation, Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Sassari, Italy. ¹²Instituto Pirenaico de Ecologia, IPE-CSIC, Zaragoza, Spain. ¹³Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, CSIC, Cordoba, Spain. ¹⁴Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, College de France, CEREGE, ECCOREV, Aix-en-Provence, France. ¹⁵University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. ¹⁶Society, Policies and Inclusive Communities, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. ¹⁷Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ¹⁸School of Rural, Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Zografou, Greece. 📧 e-mail: philippe.drobinski@lmd.ipsl.fr</footnote>