# Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of 1698 Yeast Reference Strains Revealing Potential Emerging Human Pathogens

Marie Desnos-Ollivier, Vincent Robert, Dorothée Raoux-Barbot, Marizeth

Groenewald, Françoise Dromer

► To cite this version:

Marie Desnos-Ollivier, Vincent Robert, Dorothée Raoux-Barbot, Marizeth Groenewald, Françoise Dromer. Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of 1698 Yeast Reference Strains Revealing Potential Emerging Human Pathogens. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (3), pp.e32278. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032278. pasteur-02195013

HAL Id: pasteur-02195013

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-02195013

Submitted on 26 Jul 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of 1698 Yeast Reference Strains Revealing Potential Emerging Human Pathogens

Marie Desnos-Ollivier¹,², Vincent Robert³, Dorothée Raoux-Barbot¹,², Marizeth Groenewald³, Françoise Dromer¹,²*

1 Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre National de Référence Mycologie et Antifongiques, Paris, France, 2 CNRS URA3012, Paris, France, 3 CBS-KNAW
Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands

## Abstract

New molecular identification techniques and the increased number of patients with various immune defects or underlying conditions lead to the emergence and/or the description of novel species of human and animal fungal opportunistic pathogens. Antifungal susceptibility provides important information for ecological, epidemiological and therapeutic issues. The aim of this study was to assess the potential risk of the various species based on their antifungal drug resistance, keeping in mind the methodological limitations. Antifungal susceptibility profiles to the five classes of antifungal drugs (polyens, azoles, echinocandins, allylamines and antimetabolites) were determined for 1698 yeast reference strains belonging to 992 species (634 Ascomycetes and 358 Basidiomycetes). Interestingly, geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antifungal drugs tested were significantly higher for Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes (p<0.001). Twenty four strains belonging to 23 species of which 19 were Basidiomycetes seem to be intrinsically "resistant" to all drugs. Comparison of the antifungal susceptibility profiles of the 4240 clinical isolates and the 315 reference strains belonging to 53 shared species showed similar results. Even in the absence of demonstrated *in vitro/in vivo* correlation, knowing the *in vitro* susceptibility to systemic antifungal agents and the putative intrinsic resistance of yeast species present in the environment is important because they could become opportunistic pathogens.

**Citation:** Desnos-Ollivier M, Robert V, Raoux-Barbot D, Groenewald M, Dromer F (2012) Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of 1698 Yeast Reference Strains Revealing Potential Emerging Human Pathogens. PLoS ONE 7(3): e32278. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032278

**Editor:** Matthew (Mat) Charles Fisher, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, United Kingdom

**Received** November 3, 2011; **Accepted** January 24, 2012; **Published** March 1, 2012

**Copyright:** © 2012 Desnos-Ollivier et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Funding:** This work was supported by the Institut Pasteur. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: dromer@pasteur.fr

## Introduction

Among the estimated 1.5 million fungal species, approximately 200 species of yeasts and moulds associated with humans as commensals or pathogens are reported, according to the Colloquium of the American Academy of Microbiology on the fungal Kingdom (The Fungal Kingdom: Diverse and Essential Roles in Earth's Ecosystem, June 2008, ASM http://academy.asm.org/). The number of yeasts species has increased over time. In 1928, Guillermond described only 22 genera of yeasts, and the successive editions of one textbook on yeasts included 349 species belonging to 39 genera in 1970 [1], more than 700 species belonging to 100 different genera in 1998 [2], and 11 new genera since 2003 [3,4]. In the fifth edition of the reference yeast book published by Kurtzman et al. [5], 149 genera and nearly 1500 species are described. Furthermore, new yeast species are regularly recognized as opportunistic pathogens. This can be explained by an increased awareness of invasive fungal infections and by improved techniques that allow better identification of fungal species based on polygenic analyses. There is also an increasing number of patients with various immune defects (haematological malignancies, solid tumours, organ transplantation, immunosuppressive treatments, etc.) or underlying conditions (intensive care

unit, indwelling catheter, prosthetic devices, broad spectrum antibiotics, etc.). This complex setting often prompts use of preemptive, prophylactic and prolonged curative antifungal treatments that can favour the emergence of resistant species or mutations in the drug target [6]. The azoles are to our knowledge the only class compounds used both in agriculture and in clinical medicine. They block the biosynthesis of fungal ergosterol by inhibition of cytochrome P450 14-alpha demethylase. Derivatives of piperazines, pyridines and pyrimidines are also used as fungicides for plant protection and have a mode of action similar to that of azoles [7].

Knowledge about the yeasts antifungal susceptibility profiles is limited to species responsible for human infections. During this study a comprehensive analysis of antifungal susceptibility profiles of a large number of yeast type strains available at the reference collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS, Utrecht, The Netherlands) were undertaken. Human pathogenic species as well as species recovered from other sources (e.g. environment, food and insects) were included in this study. Antifungal drugs tested belonged to the five known classes of antifungal drugs (polyenes, azoles, echinocandins, allylamines and antimetabolites). The aim of this study was to look into the possibility whether species with decreased susceptibility to one or

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
several classes of antifungal drugs could be a threat for human or animal health taking also into account their ability to grow at 37°C. We also used our database of 4240 isolates recovered mainly from clinical specimens and collected at the French National Reference Center (NRCMA) to compare the antifungal susceptibility of the 53 species shared among the CBS reference strains and the clinical isolates.

## Results

### Differences in antifungal susceptibility profiles between Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes in the CBS and the National Reference Center for Mycoses and Antifungals (NRCMA) collections

A total of 1698 yeast reference strains and 4240 clinical isolates were studied (Table 1). Table 2 summarizes the antifungal susceptibility results according to the division for all the reference strains and the clinical isolates. For the reference strains, geometric mean minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all antifungal drugs tested were significantly higher for Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes ($p<0.001$, Table 2). Thus, using the previously defined thresholds, the percentage of reference strains with resistance or decreased susceptibility to drugs was significantly higher for Basidiomycetes than for Ascomycetes (Table 3). Almost half the Basidiomycetes strains could be considered as “resistant” for flucytosine (5FC) and amphotericin B (AmB) and even more than half for fluconazole (FCZ), voriconazole (VRZ), and caspofungin (Caspo). For the Ascomycetes, less than 20% of the reference strains were considered resistant except for FCZ (38.3%). There was no visible alteration in antifungal susceptibility profiles over time for either Basidiomycetes or Ascomycetes (data not shown). If we arbitrarily define “resistance” for a given class of antifungal drug by ≥50% of the strains with decreased susceptibility to that drug, provided that at least five strains were tested, 16 of the 38 genera of reference strains of Ascomycetes tested were “resistant” to at least one class (13 being resistant to azoles), five genera to two classes (two to azoles/5FC, and one each to azoles/echinocandin, azoles/polyenes and azoles/alkylamines), and one genus, *Yarrowia*, that has already been described to be a human opportunistic pathogen, to four classes (Table S1). For the Basidiomycetes, all strains representatives of the 19 genera were “resistant” to echinocandins, none was resistant to allylamine; *Fellomyces* and *Hannaella*, that are unknown as human pathogens, were “resistant” to four classes and the strains tested belonging to the 11 genera including the known opportunistic pathogens *Trichosporon*, *Cryptococcus*, *Pseudozyma* and *Rhodosporidium* were resistant to three classes (Table S2).

For the clinical isolates, significant differences in geometric mean MICs were recorded for all drugs between Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes except for itraconazole (ITZ, not significantly different) and terbinafine (Terbi, MICs were higher in Ascomycetes compared to Basidiomycetes, $p<0.001$) (Table 2).

### Comparison of antifungal susceptibility profiles for the species shared between the collections of CBS reference strains and NRCMA clinical isolates

The MICs for the 53 different species corresponding to the 4240 clinical isolates collected at the NRCMA were analysed and compared to those obtained for the corresponding 315 reference strains (Table 4, Tables S1 and S2). When analysing data for each species (Tables S3 and S4), the overall distribution of the MICs (MIC50, MIC90 and MIC ranges) was similar between reference strains and clinical isolates.

Among the Ascomycetes, the proportion of decreased susceptibility to antifungals was similar between the reference strains and the clinical isolates for VRZ, posaconazole (PSZ), 5FC, Terbi, and Caspo. A significant but less than 2-fold difference was observed for FCZ and ITZ. The proportion of AmB resistance for reference strains was almost 2-fold more than that recorded for clinical isolates (Table 4). One *Yarrowia lipolytica* reference strain and two clinical isolates of *Candida glabrata* and *Candida krusei*, were resistant to all five classes of antifungal drugs. Major discrepancies were observed for *Candida tropicalis* with MIC50 and MIC90 of the azoles higher for the reference strains than for the clinical isolates where seven from the 12 reference strains were resistant to at least one azole, including six recovered before 1970 and four from human samples. None of the *C. tropicalis* reference strains had 5FC MIC>8 µg/ml in contrast with almost 33% (103/313) of the clinical isolates. Some discrepancies in Caspo MICs distribution were also noted with a few clinical isolates of *Candida albicans*, *Candida glabrata*, *Candida rugosa*, *Candida tropicalis*, *Clavispora lusitaniae* and *Kodamaea ohmeri* that exhibited high MICs. Most of these isolates have been recovered from patients previously exposed to echinocandins.

Among the Basidiomycetes the percentage of strains with resistance or decreased susceptibility was drastically higher among reference strains than among clinical isolates for azoles and Terbi, and lower for 5FC and AmB. Of the 604 Basidiomycetes tested (548 clinical isolates and 56 reference strains), only two *Cryptococcus neoformans*, one *Cryptococcus gattii*, one *Cryptococcus laurentii* and one *Trichosporon inkin* had low Caspo MICs, leaving 99% of the Basidiomycetes resistant to Caspo.

### Relationship between thermotolerance, source of isolation and antifungal drugs susceptibility profile

Among the 1470 reference strains for which the maximum temperature of growth was determined, 535 (36.4%) were known to grow at 37°C or above, including 488 Ascomycetes (48 genera and 227 species) and 47 Basidiomycetes (8 genera and 26 species). Therefore, the proportion of strains able to grow at 37°C varied according to the Division (46.3% for the Ascomycetes and 11.3% for the Basidiomycetes) and also according to their source of isolation (from 61.6% for strains of human source to 16.7% for those from soil, Table 5) with no Basidiomycetes that were recovered from insects were able to grow at 37°C. Among the 535 thermotolerant strains, 271 (50.7%; i.e. 256 Ascomycetes strains belonging to 177 species in 45 genera; 15 Basidiomycetes strains belonging to 15 species in eight genera) belonged to species unknown as human pathogens, or at least not described in articles available in the NCBI library (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The proportion of strains with decreased susceptibility to the various antifungal drugs varied according to the source of isolation (humans, other living organisms, food and industrial products, environment and water): azoles (39±14%), 5FC (11±8%), Terbi (13±4%), Caspo (23±12%) and AmB (20±8%) (Table 5). Strains recovered from insects had the lowest proportion of “resistance” compared to other sources for all antifungals except 5FC (data not shown). The highest proportion of “resistance” was observed for strains recovered from drinks (alcoholic beverages, fruit juices, soft drinks) (with regards to azoles and Terbi resistance), from humans (5FC), environment and animals (Caspo) and animals (AmB).

When analysing all the reference strains regardless of the thermotolerance, 24 strains (i.e. 1.5% of the 1580 strains tested against all antifungal drugs), belonging to 23 different species and including 19 Basidiomycetes, were resistant to all drugs. The reported sources were six strains from the environment, five from soil, six from plants and one from animal and human. Among the

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1.** Description of the reference strains and the clinical isolates studied.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Reference strains</th><th colspan="3">Clinical isolates</th></tr><tr><th>Ascomycetes</th><th>Basidiomycetes</th><th>Total</th><th>Ascomycetes</th><th>Basidiomycetes</th><th>Total</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Number of strains</td><td>1209</td><td>489</td><td>1698</td><td>3557</td><td>683</td><td>4240</td></tr><tr><td>genera</td><td>71</td><td>48</td><td>119</td><td>19</td><td>5</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>No. of strains per genus</td><td>1–385</td><td>1–90</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>No. of species per genus</td><td>1–257</td><td>1–70</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>species</td><td>634</td><td>358</td><td>993</td><td>43</td><td>10</td><td>53</td></tr><tr><td>No. of strains per species</td><td>1–30</td><td>1–29</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Site of isolation or substrate</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Human</td><td>125</td><td>52</td><td>177</td><td>3489</td><td>679</td><td>4168</td></tr><tr><td>Living organisms</td><td>503</td><td>246</td><td>749</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Water</td><td>24</td><td>29</td><td>53</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Environment</td><td>185</td><td>101</td><td>286</td><td>6</td><td>0</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Food & industrial products</td><td>292</td><td>19</td><td>311</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>unknown</td><td>80</td><td>42</td><td>122</td><td>59</td><td>1</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>Geographical area*</td><td>994</td><td>419</td><td>1413</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Europe</td><td>354</td><td>124</td><td>478</td><td>3493</td><td>630</td><td>4123</td></tr><tr><td>Africa</td><td>103</td><td>18</td><td>121</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>North America</td><td>171</td><td>27</td><td>198</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>South America</td><td>138</td><td>26</td><td>164</td><td>55</td><td>47</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><td>Asia</td><td>195</td><td>177</td><td>372</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Oceania</td><td>27</td><td>21</td><td>48</td><td>1</td><td>0</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Antartica</td><td>6</td><td>26</td><td>32</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Period of isolation*</td><td>1193</td><td>481</td><td>1674</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1905–1958</td><td>490</td><td>109</td><td>599</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1959–1972</td><td>262</td><td>84</td><td>346</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1973–1990</td><td>184</td><td>101</td><td>285</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1991–1995</td><td>24</td><td>24</td><td>48</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1996–2000</td><td>89</td><td>41</td><td>130</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2001–2009</td><td>144</td><td>122</td><td>266</td><td>3557</td><td>683</td><td>4240</td></tr></tbody></table>

*when information is available.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032278.t001

23 species, two were recognized human opportunistic pathogens (*Cryptococcus albidus* and *Y. lipolytica*), and three were recovered from clinical specimens (*Cryptococcus magnus*, *Bulleromyces albus* (CBS database) and *Pseudozyma hubeiensis* (NRCMA unpublished data)). Among the four Ascomycetes isolates resistant to all antifungal drugs, three were included or related to the *Y. lipolytica* clade (*Y. lipolytica*, *Candida hispaniensis* and *Candida umkomasiana*). Among these 24 "resistant" strains, 17 were able to grow at 30°C and only seven at 37°C. Finally, among the seven resistant species able to grow at 37°C, five were unknown as human pathogen (two Ascomycetes, *C. hispaniensis* and *Zygosaccharomyces mellis*; three Basidiomycetes, *Pseudozyma crassa*, *Trichosporon lactis* and *Trichosporon veenhuisii*).

Discussion

The limitations of the present study should be kept in mind. Firstly, antifungal susceptibility testing was not performed for all strains in identical conditions because of changes in incubation parameters requested by temperature requirements and slow growth rate in the test media for some species. This implies also

that not all reference strains of a given genus and/or only a few strains for a given species were available for analysis. Secondly, storage of the reference strains was uneven considering time period, geographical zone and source of isolation, thus preventing definitive conclusions regarding evolution of drug resistance over time or according to substrates. Furthermore, the proportion of Ascomycetes versus Basidiomycetes from the various substrates for the reference strains does not reflect the reality in terms of overall species' diversity, colonization, saprophytism or pathogenicity. Finally, future changes in taxonomy may alter some of our conclusions that are based on our current knowledge on specific genera or species.

The first striking result of this study was the higher proportion of strains with decreased susceptibility, regardless of the class of antifungal drugs used, among Basidiomycetes compared to Ascomycetes reference strains. The drastic difference observed for echinocandins (92% Basidiomycetes and 13% Ascomycetes reference strains with Caspo MIC≥0.5 µg/ml) is well known for pathogenic species, and was confirmed by comparison with the clinical isolates. Caspofungin is one of the three antifungal agents

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Distribution of MICs according to the phylum of clinical isolates and reference strains.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Ascomycetes</th><th colspan="3">Basidiomycetes</th></tr><tr><th>No. isolates</th><th>GeometricMean</th><th>MIC50/MIC90 (µg/mL)</th><th>Range (µg/mL)</th><th>No. isolates</th><th>GeometricMean</th><th>MIC50/MIC90 (µg/mL)</th><th>Range (µg/mL)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Type strains</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Fluconazole</td><td>1147</td><td>3.38</td><td>4/32</td><td>0.12-128</td><td>445</td><td>14.24</td><td>16/128</td><td>0.12-128</td></tr><tr><td>Voriconazole</td><td>1147</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.06/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>445</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.25/4</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Itraconazole</td><td>1147</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.06/0.05</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>445</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.12/16</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Posaconazole</td><td>1147</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.12/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>445</td><td>0.22</td><td>0.25/2</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Flucytosine</td><td>1147</td><td>0.26</td><td>0.12/2</td><td>0.12-128</td><td>445</td><td>4.82</td><td>4/128</td><td>0.12-128</td></tr><tr><td>Terbinafine</td><td>1147</td><td>0.84</td><td>1/8</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>445</td><td>1.30</td><td>2/8</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Caspofungin</td><td>1202</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.06/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>484</td><td>4.36</td><td>8/16</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin B</td><td>1202</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.06/0.25</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>484</td><td>0.15</td><td>0.12/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td colspan="9"><strong>Clinical isolates</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Fluconazole</td><td>3550</td><td>0.98</td><td>0.5/32</td><td>0.12-128</td><td>683</td><td>3.90</td><td>4/16</td><td>0.12-128</td></tr><tr><td>Voriconazole</td><td>3550</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.015/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>683</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.06/0.12</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Itraconazole</td><td>2206</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.03/1</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>427</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.06/0.25</td><td>0.015-4</td></tr><tr><td>Posaconazole</td><td>3547</td><td>0.07</td><td>0.06/1</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>683</td><td>0.10</td><td>0.12/0.25</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr><tr><td>Flucytosine</td><td>3550</td><td>0.24</td><td>0.12/1</td><td>0.12-128</td><td>683</td><td>4.17</td><td>4/16</td><td>0.12-128</td></tr><tr><td>Terbinafine</td><td>2157</td><td>1.27</td><td>2/8</td><td>0.015-16</td><td>420</td><td>0.73</td><td>1/2</td><td>0.03-16</td></tr><tr><td>Caspofungin</td><td>2998</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.06/0.25</td><td>0.015-8</td><td>548</td><td>3.9</td><td>8/8</td><td>0.12-8</td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin B</td><td>3556</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.06/0.25</td><td>0.015-4</td><td>682</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.12/0.5</td><td>0.015-16</td></tr></tbody></table>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032278.t002

in the class of echinocandins. The target of the echinocandins is the synthetic cell-wall enzyme complex beta-1,3D-glucansynthase [8]. *Filobasidiella neoformans* had a hotspot region in beta-1,3D-glucansynthase similar to that of the susceptible Ascomycetes species *C. albicans* and *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* but is intrinsically resistant to echinocandins. A previous study has already shown the presence of *fks1*-like genes in ten species of Basidiomycetes with sequences remarkably similar to *Fks1* from *F. neoformans* [9]. This difference in echinocandins susceptibility between Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes could be the result of phylogenetic differentiation of the cell-wall composition with potential modification of the three-dimensional structure of the betaglucan synthase complex that remains to be analyzed.

Almost all (84%) of the genera of Basidiomycetes included more than 50% of reference strains with decreased susceptibility to azoles compared to 34% of the genera of Ascomycetes. Most (68%) genera of Basidiomycetes included more than 50% of the reference strains with decreased susceptibility to at least three classes compared to the Ascomycetes genera (3%). The fact that the resistance profiles of the reference strains were not associated with a specific substrate or period corresponding to specific drug launching time suggest that it may not have been acquired through environmental pressure but rather through recombination or other evolutionary processes. A comprehensive analysis of the target genes is necessary to validate this hypothesis.

<table><caption>**Table 3.** Proportion of reference strains with high MIC.</caption><thead><tr><th>N° of isolates with high MIC* to the corresponding antifungal (%)</th><th>Ascomycetes</th><th>Basidiomycetes</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fluconazole ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>439/1147 (38.3)</td><td>302/445 (67.9)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Voriconazole ≥0.25 µg/mL</td><td>236/1147 (20.6)</td><td>231/445 (51.9)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Itraconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>161/1147 (14.0)</td><td>144/445 (32.4)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Posaconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>155/1147 (13.5)</td><td>149/445 (33.5)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Flucytosine ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>78/1147 (6.8)</td><td>219/445 (49.2)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Terbinafine ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>143/1147 (12.5)</td><td>80/445 (18.0)</td><td>0.006</td></tr><tr><td>Caspofungin ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>154/1202 (12.8)</td><td>445/484 (91.9)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin B ≥0.25 µg/mL</td><td>168/1202 (14.0)</td><td>214/484 (44.2)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin B ≥1 µg/mL</td><td>25/1202 (2.1)</td><td>44/484 (9.1)</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>

*Minimal inhibitory concentration.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 4.** Comparison of reference strains and clinical isolates with high MIC.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">No. isolates with MIC* to the corresponding antifungal</th><th colspan="5">Ascomycetes</th><th colspan="5">Basidiomycetes</th></tr><tr><th>type strains</th><th>%</th><th>clinical isolates</th><th>%</th><th>p</th><th>type strains</th><th>%</th><th>clinical isolates</th><th>%</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Fluconazole ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>87/258</td><td>33.7</td><td>848/3550</td><td>23.9</td><td>0.001</td><td>41/55</td><td>74.6</td><td>236/683</td><td>34.6</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Voriconazole ≥0.25 µg/mL</td><td>48/258</td><td>18.6</td><td>693/3550</td><td>19.5</td><td>0.745</td><td>41/55</td><td>74.6</td><td>48/683</td><td>7.0</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Itraconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>42/258</td><td>16.3</td><td>447/2206</td><td>20.3</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>37/55</td><td>76.3</td><td>22/427</td><td>5.2</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Posaconazole ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>46/258</td><td>17.8</td><td>624/3547</td><td>17.6</td><td>0.933</td><td>34/55</td><td>61.8</td><td>59/683</td><td>8.6</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Flucytosine ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>15/258</td><td>5.8</td><td>184/3550</td><td>5.2</td><td>0.775</td><td>11/55</td><td>20</td><td>249/683</td><td>36.5</td><td>0.013</td></tr><tr><td>Terbinafine ≥8 µg/mL</td><td>42/258</td><td>16.3</td><td>313/2157</td><td>14.5</td><td>0.457</td><td>24/55</td><td>43.6</td><td>10/420</td><td>2.4</td><td>&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Caspofungin ≥0.5 µg/mL</td><td>18/259</td><td>7</td><td>277/2898</td><td>9.6</td><td>0.182</td><td>53/56</td><td>94.6</td><td>546/548</td><td>99.6</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin B ≥0.25 µg/mL</td><td>53/259</td><td>20.5</td><td>399/3556</td><td>11.2</td><td>&lt;0.001</td><td>20/56</td><td>35.7</td><td>337/682</td><td>49.4</td><td>0.052</td></tr></tbody></table>

*Minimum Inhibitory Concentration.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032278.t004

The comparison of the antifungal susceptibility profiles of the reference strains with the clinical isolates belonging to shared species showed that the profiles were similar except for a few species. Indeed, some *Candida* spp. clinical isolates with high Caspo MIC were recovered from patients previously exposed to Caspo (acquisition of resistance by nonsense mutation in hotspot regions of the betaglucan synthase [10,11,12,13]), whereas reference strains of *C. albicans*, *C. glabrata*, *C. rugosa*, *C. tropicalis*, *C. lusitaniae* and *K. ohmeri* recovered before Caspo usage had low MICs. None of the *C. tropicalis* type strains had 5FC MIC>8 µg/ml in contrast with almost 33% of the clinical isolates. It was previously showed that most of these clinical isolates belong to a single 5FC-resistant clone [14]. The widespread use of antifungal drugs especially azoles since the 1970s in agriculture (http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/rags.asp?id=644) may also contribute to the emergence of resistance. The drugs are used repeatedly over a long period of time and could thereby create a persistent pressure of azole compounds on saprophytic fungi [15]. Indeed, resistance of clinical isolates of *Aspergillus* spp. to azoles has been shown to occur in patients treated with voriconazole but also following environmental exposure of the infecting isolates [13,16]. However, there is no obvious explanation for the high proportion of *C. tropicalis* reference strains with high azoles MICs compared to very few clinical isolates since only three were recovered after 1970. However, the overall similarity of the results between reference

strains and clinical isolates, suggests that the results obtained with the other reference strains could be valid.

Robert and Casadevall suggested in their study of fungal thermotolerance that “new human pathogenic fungi are likely to emerge from genera that are already tolerant to higher temperatures” [17]. Among the 1698 reference strains studied, 535 strains from 253 species were able to grow at human body temperature, among which several species (177/634 Ascomycetes species and 15/358 Basidiomycetes species) were unknown as human opportunistic pathogens. Keeping in mind that growth limitation evidenced *in vitro* could be related to culture medium or conditions and could not apply *in vivo*, it was found that five of the seven species were resistant to all antifungal classes and able to grow at 37°C were unknown as human pathogen. Even though the *in vitro/in vivo* correlation was not demonstrated, knowing the *in vitro* susceptibility to systemic antifungal agents and the putative intrinsic resistance of these thermotolerant species is important as they could become opportunistic human pathogens. As an example, the species *Y. lipolytica* has been studied for its biotechnological importance [18] but is also known to be responsible for human invasive infections mainly in immunocompromised patients. Interestingly, among the six species belonging to the *Y. lipolytica* clade [19], the two species *Y. lipolytica* and *C. hispaniensis*, both able to grow at 37°C, include two reference strains with high MICs for all antifungals. *Candida hispaniensis*,

<table><caption>**Table 5.** Reference strains able to grow at 37°C with high MIC according to source of isolation.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Source of isolation</th><th colspan="10">Percent of strains with decreased susceptibility to</th></tr><tr><th>No. strains able to grow at 37°C/ No. strains</th><th>No. Strains Tested in RPMI</th><th>Fluco</th><th>Vori</th><th>Itra</th><th>Posa</th><th>5FC</th><th>Terbi</th><th>No. Strains Tested in AM3</th><th>Caspo</th><th>AmB</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Human</td><td>109/177</td><td>109</td><td>28%</td><td>20%</td><td>12%</td><td>10%</td><td>16%</td><td>11%</td><td>109</td><td>21%</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>Living organisms</td><td>188/749</td><td>183</td><td>32%</td><td>20%</td><td>13%</td><td>11%</td><td>9%</td><td>9%</td><td>188</td><td>15%</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>Environment</td><td>58/286</td><td>56</td><td>45%</td><td>21%</td><td>18%</td><td>16%</td><td>5%</td><td>16%</td><td>58</td><td>17%</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>Water</td><td>9/53</td><td>9</td><td>0%</td><td>11%</td><td>11%</td><td>0%</td><td>22%</td><td>11%</td><td>9</td><td>44%</td><td>33%</td></tr><tr><td>Food & Industrial products</td><td>140/311</td><td>130</td><td>50%</td><td>25%</td><td>23%</td><td>25%</td><td>4%</td><td>19%</td><td>140</td><td>16%</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>All (mean ± SD)</td><td>504/1556</td><td>487</td><td>31±20</td><td>19±5</td><td>15±5</td><td>12±9</td><td>11±8</td><td>13±4</td><td>504</td><td>23±12</td><td>20±8</td></tr></tbody></table>

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032278.t005

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>
described in 2005, is still unknown as human or animal
opportunist. Furthermore, among the *Y. lipolytica* clade, *Candida bentonensis*, able to grow at 35°C, had high MICs for all antifungals except 5FC. *Candida galli*, previously described in chicken infections, and unable to grow above 35°C, had high MICs for 5FC, Fluco, Vori and AmB. The other species of the clade, *Candida communis* and *Aciculoconidium aculeatum* were unable to grow above 35°C and 30°C respectively and had high MICs for AmB. Of note, the isolate of the species *C. umkomasiana*, previously identified as *Y. lipolytica* was also resistant to all antifungal drugs. The genomic study of species present in the *Y. lipolytica* clade and of additional closely related species could therefore be particularly interesting in terms of multidrug resistance.

In conclusion, this study provides the first comprehensive
analysis of antifungal susceptibility profiles for almost 1700
reference strains representing more than 119 genera and 993
species. It paves the way to further phylogenetic studies on the
origin of drug resistance and evolution in Basidiomycetes and
Ascomycetes. It also shows that species with high levels of
resistance can be found in the environment without previous
environment drug pressure and could become opportunistic
human pathogens. Finally, it underlines how important correct
identification of species is, especially for uncommon species,
pointing out the need for reliable fungal sequence databases [20].

# Materials and Methods

## Yeasts Type Strains

A total of 1698 yeast reference strains available from the CBS
collection, that include type strains (T), authentic strains (AUT),
syntypes (ST), lectotypes (LT), IT (isotype), AT (allotype) or
neotypes (NT) of currently accepted species and also from
previously described species that are now considered to be
synonyms of the accepted species, were studied. The strains
belonged to the Division of Ascomycota (71.2%, 71 genera, 634
species) and Basidiomycota (28.8%, 48 genera, 358 species)
(Table 1). Strains were recovered from various sources, such as
plants (27.7%), soil (12.4%), drinks (10.7%), insects (10.6%) and
humans (10.4%) (Table 1). The geographical areas of isolation
were diverse, but most strains were isolated from Europe (33.8%)
and Asia (26.3%) for the 1413 isolates for which the information
was available. The oldest isolate was found in 1905, but 43.5% of
the strains were recovered since 1973 and 15.9% since 2001.

All strains were stored in lyophilised form at the CBS. They
were subcultured at least twice on Sabouraud agar plates (Gibco®,
Invitrogen™, Life Technologies, CA, USA) before in vitro
susceptibility testing.

## Clinical isolates

The NRCMA received clinical isolates from short-stay univer-
sity hospital laboratories. These isolates are part of surveillance
programs or send to the NRCMA due to difficulties during the
identification process. The isolates corresponding to species for
which a reference strain was available were included in the
analysis (n = 4240) (Table 1). They belonged to the Ascomycota
(83.9%, 19 genera and 43 species) and Basidiomycota (16.1%, five
genera, ten species). Five species encompass 86.3% of the clinical
isolates (*Candida albicans* (40.9%), *Cryptococcus neoformans* (14.9%),
*Candida glabrata* (14.5%), *Candida parapsilosis* (8.6%) and *Candida
tropicalis* (7.4%)). Isolates were mainly recovered from humans
(83.7%) in Europe (84.7%) and all between January 2003 and July
2010.

Upon receipt, all isolates were identified by phenotypic methods
(urease activity, Urea-Indole, bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France;

carbon assimilation profiles, ID32C, bioMérieux), and by
sequencing of the ITS and D1/D2 regions of the gene coding
for ribosomal RNA by using universal primers (V9D/LS266 and
NL1/NL4 primers, respectively [21,22,23,24]). *Candida albicans*
was differentiated from *Candida dubliniensis* by amplification of a
portion of the gene coding for actin [25]. MICs of various systemic
antifungal drugs (see below) were determined on a routine basis for
each isolate.

## In vitro susceptibility testing

In vitro susceptibility was determined by a microdilution
technique following the procedure proposed by the Antifungal
Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of EUCAST (AFST-EU-
CAST [26]) with modifications of the temperatures and duration
of incubation when necessary.

Active powder of known potency of flucytosine (5FC, Sigma, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France), fluconazole (FCZ, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA), itraconazole (ITZ, Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France), voriconazole (VRZ, Pfizer), posaconazole (PSZ, Merck and Co., Rahway, New Jersey, USA), terbinafin (Terbi, Novartis Pharma AF, Basel, Switzerland), caspofungin (Caspo, Merck) and amphotericin B (AmB, Sigma Chemicals) were used. Stock solutions were prepared in sterile distilled water (5FC, FCZ, Caspo, Terbi) or DMSO (AmB, ITZ, VRZ, PSZ) and stored at -80°C until used. Stock solutions were diluted in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS, Sigma) for all antifungals except Caspo and AmB that were diluted in AM3 medium (Difco™, Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France). Final concentrations ranged from 0.125 to 64 µg/ml (5FC and FCZ) and from 0.015 to 8 µg/ml (for the others). Both media were supplemented with glucose (final concentration 2%). Microplates (96 wells flat-bottom, TPP®, Switzerland) were prepared by batches and stored frozen at -20°C for less than 6 months. The following reference strains were included as quality controls: *C. parapsilosis* ATCC 22019 and *Pichia kudriavzevii* (synonym of *Issatchenkia orientalis*, teleomorph of *Candida krusei* [27]) ATCC6258. Fungal growth was determined by an automated microplate reader spectrophotometer (Multiscan RC-351, Labsystems Oy, Helsinki, Finland) at 492 nm after at least 24 h of incubation and/or until absorbance of the drug-free well was ≥0.2. The MIC was defined as a 50% (90% for amphotericin B) or more reduction in growth compared to the drug-free well.

For the reference strains, a few parameters had to be changed
because the procedure is standardized for glucose fermentative
yeasts able to grow at 35°C. Thus, growth temperature for the
subculture and subsequent incubation of the microplates was
changed for the majority of the strains (30°C, 20°C and 15°C for
1503, 158, and 17 strains, respectively). Incubation time varied,
24 hrs for 713 (42%), 48 hrs for 466 (27%), 72 hrs for 232 (14%),
4 days for 145 (8.5%), 6 days for 121 (7%), 7 days for 21 (1%)
strains. Likewise, the test medium did not allow sufficient growth
and thus determination of the MIC for some strains was limited to
azoles, 5FC and Terbi or Caspo and AmB (106 missing values for
drugs tested in RPMI and 12 for drugs tested in AM3).

Resistance to FCZ and VRZ were defined as a MIC higher than
or equal to 8 and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively according to EUCAST
recommendations [26]. Decreased susceptibility to 5FC and Caspo
were arbitrarily defined by a MIC higher than or equal to 8 and
0.5 µg/mL, respectively according to previous data obtained in the
laboratory showing that clinical isolates of *Candida* spp. exhibiting
MICs above these thresholds harboured mutations in target genes
[28,29]. We defined arbitrary thresholds for ITZ, PSZ, AmB and
Terbi by determining the MIC that inhibited at least 90% of the
clinical isolates. This corresponded to a MIC higher than or equal to

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>
0.5 µg/mL for ITZ and PSZ, ≥0.25 µg/mL for AmB and ≥8 µg/mL for Terbi. The values corresponding to the concentration inhibiting 50% (MIC50) or 90% (MIC90) of the strains were calculated for species including more than ten strains.

## Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata™ (version 10.1, College Station, TX, USA). Distribution of MICs between Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes were compared using the non-parametric Kruskall Wallis test. Comparisons between groups were done using Chi Square or Fisher exact tests for the proportions of strains/isolates with decreased susceptibility to a drug. A *p*-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

## Supporting Information

<caption>**Table S1** Percentage of isolates with high MIC within genera in the Ascomycota phylum. (XLS)</caption>

<caption>**Table S2** Percentage of “resistant” isolates within genera in the Division Basidiomycota. (XLS)</caption>

## References

1. Lodder J (1970) The Yeasts, A taxonomic study. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

2. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (1998) The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

3. Kurtzman CP (2003) Phylogenetic circumscription of *Saccharomyces*, *Kluyveromyces* and other members of the *Saccharomycetaceae*, and the proposal of the new genera *Lachancea*, *Nakaseomyces*, *Naumovia*, *Vanderwaltozyma* and *Žygotorulaspora*. FEMS Yeast Res 4: 233–245.

4. Kurtzman CP, Suzuki M (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of ascomycete yeasts that form coenzyme Q-9 and the proposal of the new genera *Babjeviella*, *Meyerozyma*, *MILLEROZYMa*, *PRICEmyces* and *Scheffersomyces*. Mycoscience 51: 2–14.

5. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (2011) The Yeasts, A taxonomic study. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

6. Lortholary O, Desnos-Ollivier M, Sitbon K, Fontanet A, Bretagne S, et al. (2011) Recent exposure to caspofungin or fluconazole influences the epidemiology of candidemia: a prospective multicenter study involving 2,441 patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 532–538.

7. Ji H, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Zhu J, et al. (2000) A three-dimensional model of lanosterol 14alpha-demethylase of *Candida albicans* and its interaction with azole antifungals. J Med Chem 43: 2493–2505.

8. Denning DW (2003) Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362: 1142–1151.

9. Reverberi M, Di Mario F, Tomati U (2004) beta-Glucan synthase induction in mushrooms grown on olive mill wastewaters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66: 217–225.

10. Baixench MT, Aoun N, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Bretagne S, et al. (2007) Acquired resistance to echinocandins in *Candida albicans*: case report and review. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 1076–1083.

11. Dannaoui E, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Grenouillet F, Cassaing S, et al. (2011) Infections due to *Candida* spp. with acquired echinocandin-resistance emerge in France. Emerg Infect Disin press.

12. Kahn JN, Garcia-Effron G, Hsu MJ, Park S, Marr KA, et al. (2007) Acquired echinocandin resistance in a *Candida krusei* isolate due to modification of glucan synthase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 1876–1878.

13. Snelders E, van der Lee HA, Kuijpers J, Rijns AJ, Varga J, et al. (2008) Emergence of azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus* and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med 5: e219.

14. Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Bernede C, Robert V, Raoux D, et al. (2008) Clonal population of flucytosine-resistant *Candida tropicalis* from blood cultures, Paris, France. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 557–565.

15. Verweij PE, Snelders E, Kema GHJ, Mellado E, Melchers WJG (2009) Azole resistance in *Aspergillus fumigatus*: a side-eff ect of environmental fungicide use? Lancet Infect Dis 9: 789–795.

16. Alanio A, Sitterle E, Liance M, Farrugia C, Foulet F, et al. (2011) Low prevalence of resistance to azoles in *Aspergillus fumigatus* in a French cohort of

<caption>**Table S3** Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for azoles. (XLS)</caption>

<caption>**Table S4** Comparison of the distribution of MICs between clinical isolates and reference strains from the 53 shared species for Amphotericine B, Flucytosine, Terbinafine and Caspofungine. (XLS)</caption>

## Acknowledgments

Thanks to Damien Hoinard (NRCMA) and Wendy Epping (CBS) for technical help. Thanks to Dea Garcia-Hermoso and Stéphane Bretagne for proofreading. Thanks to Jack Edwards and Marc Orbach for their helpful information about use of antifungal in agriculture.

## Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MDO VR FD. Performed the experiments: MDO DRB MG. Analyzed the data: MDO VR FD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MDO VR DRB MG FD. Wrote the paper: MDO VR MG FD.

patients treated for haematological malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 371–374.

17. Robert VA, Casadevall A (2009) Vertebrate endothermy restricts most fungi as potential pathogens. J Infect Dis 200: 1623–1626.

18. Knutsen AK, Robert V, Poot GA, Epping W, Figge M, et al. (2007) Polyphasic re-examination of *Yarrowia lipolytica* strains and the description of three novel *Candida* species: *Candida oslonensis* sp. nov., *Candida alimentaria* sp. nov. and *Candida hollandica* sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57: 2426–2435.

19. Kurtzman CP (2005) New species and a new combination in the *Hyphopichia* and *Yarrowia* yeast clades. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 88: 121–130.

20. Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH, et al. (2006) Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal perspective. PLoS One 1: e59.

21. de Hoog GS, van den Ende GAH (1998) Molecular diagnostics of clinical strains of filamentous Basidiomycetes. Mycoses 41: 183–189.

22. Masclaux F, Gueho E, de Hoog GS, Christen R (1995) Phylogenetic relationships of human-pathogenic *Cladosporium* (*Xylohypha*) species inferred from partial LS rRNA sequences. J Med Vet Mycol 33: 327–338.

23. O'Donnell K (1993) *Fusarium* and its near relatives. In: Taylor DRRaJW, ed. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. pp 225–233.

24. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In MA. Innis, et al., editor. PCR Protocols: Academic, San Diego. pp 315–322.

25. Donnelly SM, Sullivan DJ, Shanley DB, Coleman DC (1999) Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of *Candida dubliniensis* based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences. Microbiology 145: 1871–1882.

26. Subcommittee on AFST of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2008) EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts. Clin Microbiol Infect 14: 398–405.

27. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar-Powers E (2008) Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 939–954.

28. Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Raoux D, Hoinard D, Dromer F, et al. (2008) Mutations in the fks1 gene in *Candida albicans*, *C. tropicalis*, and *C. krusei* correlate with elevated caspofungin MICs uncovered in AM3 medium using the method of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 3092–3098.

29. Desnos-Ollivier M, Dromer F, Dannaoui E (2008) Detection of caspofungin resistance in *Candida* spp. by Etest. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2389–2392.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>