<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# Flows, circulations, and energy transport in the outer and deep atmospheres of synchronous and non-synchronous hot Jupiters

Félix Sainsbury-Martinez, Pascal Tremblin

► To cite this version:

Félix Sainsbury-Martinez, Pascal Tremblin. Flows, circulations, and energy transport in the outer and deep atmospheres of synchronous and non-synchronous hot Jupiters. Astronomy & Astrophysics - A&A, 2024, 691, pp.A232. 10.1051/0004-6361/202451603 . cea-04786775

HAL Id: cea-04786775

https://cea.hal.science/cea-04786775v1

Submitted on 16 Nov 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Flows, circulations, and energy transport in the outer and deep atmospheres of synchronous and non-synchronous hot Jupiters

Félix Sainsbury-Martinez<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,\* and Pascal Tremblin<fnref n="1" />

Received 22 July 2024 / Accepted 18 September 2024

## ABSTRACT

**Aims.** Recent studies have shown that vertical enthalpy transport can explain the inflated radii of highly irradiated gaseous exoplanets. Simultaneously, they have also shown that rotation can influence this transport, leading to highly irradiated, rapidly rotating objects that are uninflated. Here, we explore the flows that underpin this transport, including the impact of synchronous or non-synchronous rotation.

**Methods.** We used DYNAMICO to run a series of long timescale HD209458b-like atmospheric models at various rotation rates. For models that are tidally locked, we considered rotation rates between 1/16th and 40 times the rotation rate of HD209458b, whilst for non-synchronous models, we considered the range one-eighth to four times HD209458b.

**Results.** We find that our synchronous models fall into one of three Ω-dependent regimes. At low Ω, we find that the outer atmosphere dynamics are driven by a divergent day-night wind, which drives weak vertical transport and can lead to the formation of a night-side hot-spot. At intermediate Ω, we find classical hot Jupiter dynamics, whilst at high Ω we find a strong Coriolis effect that suppresses off-equator dynamics, including the jet-driving standing waves, thus also reducing vertical transport. As for non-synchronicity, when small, we find that it has little effect on the dynamics. However as it grows, we find that temporal variations prevent the formation of the persistent structures that drive large-scale dynamics and transport.

**Conclusions.** We find that rotation can significantly impact the atmospheric dynamics of irradiated exoplanets, including vertical enthalpy advection, which may help explain the scatter in the hot Jupiter radius-irradiation relation. We have also identified a seemingly robust atmospheric feature at slow rotation: a night-side hot-spot. As this may have important implications for both the phase curve and atmospheric chemistry, we suggest that this study be followed up with next-generation global circulation models (GCMs) that robustly model radiation and chemistry.

**Key words.** hydrodynamics – planets and satellites: atmospheres – planets and satellites: fundamental parameters – planets and satellites: interiors

## 1. Introduction

Thanks to the continuing efforts of the observational and instrumental astrophysics community, the parameter regime in which highly irradiated Jupiter-like planets can be found has expanded greatly (see, for example, Shporer et al. 2017; Hjorth et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2020; Schlecker et al. 2020; Dong et al. 2021; Stangret et al. 2022; Ulmer-Moll et al. 2022). In particular, there has been a significant increase in the range of orbital radii in which irradiated Jupiter-mass planets can be observed, leading to an increase in the number of known 'warm' Jupiters. Simultaneously, numerical studies of hot Jupiter and hot brown dwarf atmospheres have revealed that rotation can play a significant role in both the horizontal and vertical dynamics (Showman et al. 2015; Mendonça 2019; Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2021). For example, Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2021), found that in addition to the link between radius inflation and planetary irradiation, a link might also exist between the level of radius inflation observed and the rotation rate of the exoplanet in question (see Sect. 5). Specifically, they suggest that the lack of observed radius inflation for the ultra-short orbit hot brown

dwarf SDSS1411b could be explained by the influence that rotation has on the atmospheric dynamics. A similar dynamical story might also explain the radius of the ultra-short orbit hot brown dwarf WD0137-349b, with the atmospheric models of Lee et al. (2020) also suggesting that the dynamics of this hot brown dwarf are highly influenced by rotation.

Examples of how the Coriolis effect can influence atmospheric dynamics can be found in the Solar System. Generally, planetary atmospheric dynamics depend upon the influence of both planetary irradiation and rotation, with the latter effect leading to the formation of three distinct atmospheric regimes.

At slow rotation rates (e.g. Venus and Titan) atmospheric dynamics are dominated by planetary scale Hadley cells (Hadley 1735; Schneider 2006; Showman et al. 2013b) that mix temperature horizontally, resulting in weak latitudinal temperature gradients. This is known as Cyclostrophic circulation and leads to significant super rotation of the winds as well as strong circumpolar vortexes, the latter of which is described well by thermal wind balance (Flasar et al. 2010). We note that, in the slow rotation regime, strong drag can also play a role in shaping the atmospheric wind, with a force balance between pressure gradients and drag leading to winds to just flow down pressure gradients rather than developing Cyclostrophic circulations (Showman et al. 2013a).

<footnote n="1">¹ Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CNRS, CEA, Maison de la Simulation, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK</footnote>

<footnote>\* Corresponding author; f.sainsbury-martinez@leeds.ac.uk</footnote>
As the rotation rate increases, one arrives at the dynamical regime occupied by both Earth and Mars: At low latitudes, the Coriolis effect remains relatively weak, and Hadley cells develop (the tropics), However, as one moves to higher latitudes (i.e. the extra-tropics; $\theta > 30^{\circ}$ for Earth), the regime changes, and rotational effects start to play a much more significant role. This results in the wind changing from being cyclostrophic to geostrophic, which in turn is paired with a change in the thermal and angular-momentum transport from Hadley circulations to baroclinic instabilities (which drive the extra-tropical (anti)cyclones that dominate much of Europe's and the US's weather; Hoskins & Valdes 1990; Chang et al. 2002; Laurila et al. 2021). As a consequence of this change in dynamics, meridional heat transport has weakened, resulting in latitudinal temperature gradients that are comparable to vertical gradients.

The strength of the meridional heat transport continues to decrease as one moves into the rapid rotation regime, as seen on Jupiter, Saturn, and the other gaseous Solar System, giants. Here, the Coriolis effect plays a significant role at all latitudes, leading to a geostrophic atmosphere dominated by the infamous banded jet structure (Ingersoll & Vasavada 1998) (with baroclinic instabilities being proposed as a mechanism to drive mixing, i.e. angular-momentum-transport, between bands; Young et al. 2019).

A similar change in dynamics is expected to occur in exoplanetary atmospheres, albeit over a significantly wider parameter space thanks to the much wider variety of planetary type and orbital radii combinations found outside of the Solar System. One such combination, found only outside of the Solar System, is the hot Jupiter, a Jupiter-like, gaseous planet that is in a very short orbit and hence is very highly irradiated. Whilst a number of recent studies have explored how atmospheric dynamics change with orbital radii (Showman et al. 2015; Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2023a), these come with the proviso that the models link effects caused by changes in both planetary irradiation and rotation, making it difficult to explore the effects that rotation alone has on the dynamics. Further, even studies that have explored the isolated effects of rotation alone (e.g; Mendonça 2019) have only done so for a few rotation rates, although even these limited studies have shown how rotation can shape the horizontal and vertical transport.

As such, and in order to isolate how rotation affects the atmospheric dynamics (with a particular focus on vertical potential-temperature transport, which has the potential to explain the radius inflation problem for both hot Jupiters and hot brown dwarfs; Tremblin et al. 2017; Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019, 2021, 2023b), here we present a series of deep HD209458b-like atmospheric models in which everything but the rotation rate is held constant. Specifically, the rotation rate is varied between $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.0625\Omega_0$ and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 40\Omega_0$, where $\Omega_0 = 2.1 \times 10^{-5}\text{s}^{-1}$ is the canonical angular rotation rate of HD209458b, and the atmospheric models are run until the deep atmosphere (with $P_{\text{max}} = 200\text{bar}$) is asymptotically close to equilibrium. These values were chosen such that our models would span the rotation regimes found in the Solar System, and we investigate cases in which the rotation is both synchronous and non-synchronous.

The structure of this work is as follows. In Sect. 2 we introduce the model we use to explore the effects of rotation on atmospheric dynamics and observables. This includes both a brief description of our 3D global circulation model (GCM) DYNAMICO, as well as a more in depth discussion of the parametrisations we use. Then, in Sect. 3, we discuss how rotation influences the atmospheric dynamics of synchronously

rotating hot Jupiters, starting with zonal-mean dynamics before moving onto the horizontal and vertical winds and heat transport, which we explore via both the Helmholtz wind decomposition as well as the enthalpy flux. Together these allow us to investigate how rotation influences deep atmospheric heating, and hence observed radius inflation. We then, in Sect. 4, perform a similar analysis for a set of hot Jupiter atmospheric models in which the orbital period and planetary rotation period are allowed to diverge (i.e. non-synchronous rotation), investigating how sensitive the standing-wave driven dynamics, and hence the vertical heat transport, are to longitudinal shifts in the planetary irradiation profile. We finish, in Sect. 5, with concluding remarks, discussing the implications of our results and suggestions for future studies, with next-generation GCMs, which will investigate the robustness of our results. In particular, we are very interested in confirming if the formation of a night-side hot-spot at slow rotation rates is just a feature of our atmospheric models, or if it is a robust feature that may have important implications for both the chemistry and observations of more slowly rotating hot Jupiters (i.e. hot Jupiters in longer orbits around massive and bright stars).

## 2. Model setup

In order to investigate how rotation impacts atmospheric dynamics in both the observable outer atmosphere, and the more quiescent (but still dynamically important) deep atmosphere, we adopt the simplified atmospheric setup Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2019) used to model the deep atmosphere of HD209458b. This is necessitated by both the high computational cost of evolving the quiescent deep atmosphere to steady state (even when we initialise the model with an adiabat close to the expected equilibrium; Rauscher & Menou 2010; Mayne et al. 2014; Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2021) as well as the large range of rotation rates considered: from $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.0625\Omega_0$ and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 40\Omega_0$, where $\Omega_0 = \Omega_{\text{HD209458b}} = 2.1 \times 10^{-5}\text{s}^{-1}$.

Here, we give a very brief overview of the highly computationally efficient GCM DYNAMICO (Sect. 2.1), which uses a Newtonian Cooling approach to model the radiative forcing (Sect. 2.2), which we use to run a large array of atmospheric models to steady state at all pressures, and from which a smaller subset of models that represent the different dynamical regimes observed are selected (Sect. 2.3).

### 2.1. DYNAMICO

DYNAMICO is one of a number of highly computationally efficient global circulation models that has been developed to run on the next-generation of Exascale supercomputers, enabling atmospheric models of resolutions and regimes that where previously out of reach. To achieve this, DYNAMICO solves the primitive equations of meteorology (Dubos & Voitus 2014; Vallis 2006) on a spherical icosahedral grid (Dubos et al. 2015). Here we configure this horizontal-grid such that the angular resolution of each grid-cell is approximately $2.5^{\circ}$. Vertically, the levels of the pressure-grid are linearly spaced in $\log(P)$ space with a maximum pressure of 200 bar and a minimum pressure of $7 \times 10^{-3}$ bar. This pressure range was selected such that we model both the highly irradiated outer atmosphere where irradiation always dominates over transport as well as a sufficiently large region of the deep atmosphere such that the effects of differing vertical heat transport rates are clearly visible. We note that the vertical boundaries of our model are closed and
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 1. Zonally and temporally averaged, over five Earth years of simulation time, zonal wind profiles for three HD 209458b-like models with rotation rates of 0.125Ω₀ (top), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (bottom).</figcaption></figure>

stress-free such that the only means of energy transport into and out-of the system are the numerical-dissipation (implemented as a hyperdiffusion filter with a fixed dissipation time-scale) required to stabilise the system against grid-scale noise, and the Newtonian cooling relaxation scheme that we use to model the stellar irradiation (Sect. 2.2).

Following the calibration procedures of Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2019) and Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2021), we select a numerical dissipation time-scale of $τ_{dissip} = 2500$ s in order to ensure the stability of the equatorially confined jets that develop in our most rapidly rotating models (e.g. Fig. 1c). These narrow jets with their high latitudinal velocity gradients also result in us setting a 90 second model time-step, which balances the need to correctly reproduce model physics, whilst also minimising the computational cost modelling equilibrium deep atmospheres.

## 2.2. Radiative forcing via Newtonian cooling

As discussed above, for computational efficiency reasons, we do not directly model either the incident stellar irradiation or resulting night-side thermal emission. Instead, as discussed in Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2019), we take a Newtonian cooling approach in which the outer atmosphere is relaxed onto a spatially varying equilibrium temperature profile $T_{eq}$ over a time-scale based upon the local radiative time-scale $τ_{rad}$. In DYNAMICO, this is achieved by adding a source term to the temperature evolution equation:

$$ \frac{H}{c_p} = \frac{\partial T(P, \theta, \phi)}{\partial t} = - \frac{T(P, \theta, \phi) - T_{eq}(P, \theta, \phi)}{\tau_{rad}(P)}, \quad (1) $$

where $H$ is the local heating rate and $c_p$ is the specific heat capacity. For numerical reasons, we express the equilibrium temperature profile ($T_{eq}(P, \theta, \phi)$) onto which the atmosphere is relaxed, in terms of the night-side temperature profile $T_n(P)$ (Iro et al. 2005) and a pressure dependent day-night temperature difference ($ΔT(P)$) that has been calibrated such as to reproduce observations of the hot Jupiter HD 209458b:

$$ T_{eq}(P, \theta, \phi) = T_n(P) + \max[0, \Delta T(P) \cdot \cos(\theta) \cdot \cos(\phi - 180^\circ)] + \Delta T(P) \cos(\theta) \max[0, \cos(\phi - \pi)], \quad (2) $$

where the night-side temperature profile is parametrised as series of linear in $log(P)$ space interpolations between the following T-P points

$$ T_{\text{night}} = (800, 1100, 1800) \text{ @ } P = (10^{-6}, 1, (\ge)10) \text{ bar,} \quad (3) $$

and the day-night temperature difference takes the form

$$ \Delta T(P) = \begin{cases} 600 \text{ K} & \text{if } P < 0.01 \text{ bar} \\ 600 \text{ K} \log(P/(0.01)) & \text{if } 0.01 \text{ bar} < P < 10 \text{ bar.} \\ 0 & \text{if } P > 10 \text{ bar} \end{cases} \quad (4) $$

The radiative time-scale over which this relaxation occurs is also based upon the work of Iro et al. (2005), with the linear in $log(P)$ space interpolation taking the form:

$$ \log(\tau_{\text{rad}}) = (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, \log(\tau_{\text{rad}}^d)) \text{ @ } P = (10^{-6}, 1, 10, 200) \text{ bar.} \quad (5) $$

For the majority of models discussed here, we set the deep radiative time-scale to infinity $τ_{rad}^d = \infty$, thus disabling radiative forcing in the deep atmosphere, between 20 and 200 bar, where it is expected to be significantly slower than advection (i.e. transport) (Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019).

## 2.3. HD 209458b-like atmospheric models

In order to explore how rotation impacts the outer and deep atmospheric dynamics and observables of highly irradiated, gaseous, exoplanets, we have explored synchronously rotating atmospheres at 28 different rotation rates (between $Ω_{rot} = 0.0625Ω_0$ and $Ω_{rot} = 40Ω_0$; discussed in Sect. 3) and non-synchronously rotating atmospheres at 13 different planetary rotation rates (between $Ω_{rot} = 0.25Ω_0$ and $Ω_{rot} = 4Ω_0$, with the orbital period held constant at that of HD209458b; discussed in Sect. 4). Here each model was run for over 200 Earth years of simulation time to ensure that the radiatively active layers ($P < 10$ bar) were equilibrated. We note that the deep atmospheres in all the models presented here should also be close to equilibrium, however the deep heating rate asymptotically slows as we approach steady-state and hence modelling the last few kelvin of heating would require significant additional computation for little change in the atmospheric dynamics (relative to the difference between a deep isotherm and adiabat; Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019).

The parameters for these models are given in Table 1 and are the same for both synchronous and non-synchronous models, with one major difference. In the synchronous models, the Newtonian Cooling profile is fixed in both latitude and longitude, representing the irradiation of a tidally-locked exoplanet. On the other hand, in our non-synchronous models, the longitude of the Newtonian Cooling (forcing) profile is updated every
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2.** Longitudinally averaged profiles of the zonal wind at five different latitudes spanning the region from the equator to the northern pole (90°), for three HD 209458b-like models at different rotation rates: 0.125Ω₀ (left), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (right). These three rotation rates have been chosen to emphasise the change in zonal flow dynamics with rotation regime. Positive wind speeds indicate eastwards flows and for each wind profile we average over a 20° latitudinal band centred at the labelled latitude.</figcaption></figure>

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Parameters for simulations.</caption><thead><tr><th>Quantity (units)</th><th>Description</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>dt (s)</td><td>Time-step</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>N°</td><td>Angular Resolution</td><td>2.7°</td></tr><tr><td>P<sub>top</sub> (bar)</td><td>Pressure at Top</td><td>7 × 10<sup>-3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>P<sub>bottom</sub> (bar)</td><td>Pressure at Bottom</td><td>200</td></tr><tr><td>g (m s<sup>-2</sup>)</td><td>Gravity</td><td>8.0</td></tr><tr><td>R<sub>HJ</sub> (m)</td><td>HJ Radius</td><td>10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td>Ω<sub>0</sub> (s<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>Base HJ Angular Rotation</td><td>2.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>c<sub>p</sub> (J kg<sup>-1</sup> K<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>Specific Heat</td><td>13 226.5</td></tr><tr><td>R<sub>g</sub> (J kg<sup>-1</sup> K<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>Ideal Gas Constant</td><td>3779.0</td></tr></tbody></table>

time-step based upon the difference between the planetary and orbital rotation rates:

$$ \Delta\Omega = \Omega_{\text{rot}} - \Omega_{\text{orb}} \qquad (6) $$

$$ \phi_{\text{net}} = (t * \Delta\Omega) \mod (360). \qquad (7) $$

## 3. Synchronous rotation

We start by exploring how rotation affects the atmospheric dynamics of synchronously rotating exoplanets, focusing our analysis on three rotation rates (0.125Ω₀, Ω₀, 15Ω₀) that are typical of the three dynamical regions observed. We return to our full sample in Sect. 3.5 where we investigate the influence of rotation on vertical heat transport. And we finish, in Sect. 3.6, with a brief discussion of non-dimensional length scales, rotational regimes, and the resolution of our models.

### 3.1. Zonal-mean zonal-winds

We begin our study by exploring how the zonal-mean zonal-winds change with rotation rate. Specifically, as previously alluded to, we find that our models all fit into one of three dynamical regimes (or the transition between regimes), as shown in Fig. 1.

At slower rotation rates ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} < 0.5\Omega_0$; see Fig. 1a), we find that a relatively slow, very shallow, and latitudinally extended ‘jet’ appears to dominate the zonal-mean zonal-wind (this can also be seen in vertical slices of the zonal-mean zonal-wind; see

Fig. 2a). This is paired with a rather quiescent mid to deep atmosphere ($|U|_{\text{max}} < 150\,\text{m s}^{-1}$ for $P > 0.6\,\text{bar}$), which implies that deep mixing may be suppressed in this regime. We note that this weakening of the equatorial jet is similar to that found in the ten day rotational period models of Mendonça (2019).

As $\Omega_{\text{rot}}$ increases (between $0.5\Omega_0 < \Omega_{\text{rot}} \le 5\Omega_0$ for our models), we find that the zonal-mean zonal wind (Fig. 1b) resembles that found in the classical hot Jupiter regime: a strong zonal jet that extends all the way from the irradiated outer atmosphere to the advective deep atmosphere ($P > 10\,\text{bar}$), flanked by weaker high latitude counter-flows (see Fig. 2b) that are typically associated with the zonal jet driving standing wave pattern (see Sect. 3.4 and Showman & Polvani 2011). We note that this jet is slightly narrower than the ‘jet’ that forms in the slow rotation regime. As shown in Fig. 3b, the latitudinal extent of the jet is highly sensitive to the rotation rate, likely due to the influence that rotation plays, via the Coriolis effect, on off-equator dynamics (see Fig. 3a).

This can be seen in our $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 15\Omega_0$ model where we find (Fig. 1c) an even narrower zonal jet that extends all the way from the outer atmosphere to the very bottom of the simulation domain (Fig. 2c). Once again we also find that this jet is braced by weaker counter flows, however due to the Coriolis effect, these counter flows have become more latitudinally confined, revealing even weaker easterly flows near the poles. This pattern of alternating easterly and westerly flows is reminiscent of the wind structure found for gas giants in the Solar System, the weakly irradiated and rapidly rotating hot Jupiter models of Showman et al. (2015), and the rapidly rotating brown dwarf SDSS1411b (Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2021).

This narrowing of the jet and suppression of off-equator flows continues as we move to even higher rotation rates. However here another effect also becomes apparent: a reduction in the total zonal transport by the jet, which can be seen in Fig. 4a as a reduction in the mean zonal wind speed with increasing *R* (an effect we discuss in more detail in Sect. 3.4). As we discuss in Sect. 3.4, this is likely due to the Coriolis suppression of the jet-driving off-equator standing Rossby and Kelvin waves.

### 3.2. Meridional circulation streamfunction

Moving onto the meridional circulation profile, specifically the streamfunction of the mass flux on the meridional (i.e. latitudinal-pressure) plane, we again find that our models fall into three distinct regimes (Fig. 5). This is in agreement with
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 3.** Latitudinal Rossby number, $R_0$ (top), and zonal-mean zonal-wind, $u$ (bottom), profiles in the outer atmospheres ($P \approx 0.016\text{bar}$) of five HD 209458b-like models at different rotation rates spanning the range $0.125\Omega_0 \rightarrow 15\Omega_0$.

the results of Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2019), who suggests that the meridional circulation, and more generally the vertical dynamics, are driven by the horizontal winds.

Starting in the slowly rotating regime, we find (Fig. 5a) a relatively weak meridional circulation profile that generally consists of a single circulation cell in each hemisphere. The only exception to this is the very deepest regions of the simulation domain which has not yet equilibrated due to the low local wind speeds (Fig. 1a) and hence long dynamical time-scales. In the outer atmosphere, where the influence of rotation on the global overturning circulation is strongest, these circulations are driven by the net-eastward zonal wind, and as a result we find clockwise and anti-clockwise circulation cells in the southern or northern hemisphere respectively, cells that combine at the equator to drive a weak, net, downflow. However, as we move deeper ($P > 0.5\text{bar}$) and the net zonal-wind fades to near zero (see Fig. 2a), the sense of these circulations is reversed, leading to an equatorial upwelling that is typical of a global overturning circulation that is barely influenced by rotation (Hammond & Lewis 2021).

Moving towards the classical hot Jupiter rotation regime, we find a meridional circulation profile (Fig. 5b) similar to that found by Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019: a pair of meridional circulation cells in each hemisphere which combine together to drive an equatorial downflow from the outer atmosphere to the bottom of the simulation domain (albeit with a slight equatorial upflow at very low pressures where $\tau_{rad} \ll \tau_{adv}$ and hence no jet has formed; see Fig. 2b), a mass conserving upflow at

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 4.** Two plots showing how the mean zonal wind at the equator (top) and mean vertical wind near the northern pole (bottom) vary with global mean Rossby number for 29 HD 209458b-like models spanning the rotation range $0.125\Omega_0 \rightarrow 15\Omega_0$.

mid-latitudes, and finally weak polar downflows. Further, this circulation is almost an order of magnitude stronger than that found in the other rotation regimes, which may help to explain this regimes strong vertical enthalpy advection (see Sect. 3.5).

Finally, in the rapidly rotating regime, we find a meridional circulation profile with multiple circulation cells per hemisphere (Fig. 5c), much like what was found for SDSS1411b by Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2021). These circulation cells combine at the equator to drive a relatively weak downflow, and, much like the zonal wind, the circulation cells become significantly weaker as we move towards higher latitudes. Furthermore, both this effect, as well as the number of circulation cells in each hemisphere, increases with $\Omega$, an effect that is likely linked to banded zonal-wind structure that also develops (Fig. 2c).

### 3.3. Horizontal-wind and temperature maps

In order to better understand the dynamics discussed above, we next investigate the horizontal wind and temperature maps at select pressure levels for three HD 209458b-like models which fall into our three regimes of interest, as shown in Fig. 6. Here the pressure levels have been chosen so as to emphasise the difference between the dynamical regimes (i.e. the differences associated with varying both rotation rate and relative radiative and advective dynamical strengths).
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5.** Zonally and temporally, over five Earth years of simulation time, averaged meridional circulation streamfunctions for three HD 209458b-like models with rotation rates of 0.125Ω₀ (top), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (bottom). Here the meridional circulation profile is plotted on a log scale with clockwise circulations shown in red and anti-clockwise circulations shown in blue. At the base rotation rate, for example, these circulations combine at the equator to drive an equatorial downflow at almost all pressures.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6.** Temporally averaged, over five Earth years of simulation time, zonal wind (quivers) and temperature maps at three different pressures (0.0026 bar, top, to 0.2 bar, bottom) for three HD 209458b-like models at different rotation rates ranging from 0.125Ω₀ (left) to 15Ω₀ (right). For each pressure level and rotation rate, the RMS wind speed is shown in the top right.</figcaption></figure>
We start our analysis with the slowly rotating regime (left column of Fig. 6). Here, in the outer atmosphere, Fig. 6a, we find that the horizontal wind primarily flows from the day-side to the night-side with almost no asymmetry (i.e. an almost isotropic divergence of the wind on the hot day-side away from the sub-stellar point and convergence of wind on the cold night-side). However almost isotropic does not mean completely. We find that the easterly flow from the day to night-side is faster than its westerly equivalent, and that the convergence point of the winds on the night-side is west of the anti-stellar point. Both of these effects can be linked to the, weak, influence of rotation on the atmosphere, either in the form of standing waves attempting to drive an equatorial jet (and hence introducing a preferred direction to flows), or the preferential enhancement or suppression of flows with or against the direction of rotation respectively.

Moving deeper into the atmosphere (Fig. 6d) we start to find evidence that horizontal advection is shaping the thermal structure as the influence of radiation wanes. Of particular note are the equatorial winds, which are now eastwards at all longitudes, although the influence of divergent day-night winds remains with the equatorial winds being significantly slower just west of the substellar point (see Sect. 3.4 for more details). We also catch our first glimpse of a rather unusual feature that is exclusive to the slowly rotating regime, a slight hot-spot on the night-side, where the divergent winds converge (as we discuss in Sect. 3.5, this is not a coincidence).

This night-side hot-spot grows in strength as we move towards mid-pressures (0.2 bar; see Fig. 6g), resulting in a rather unusual wind and temperature structure: the hottest region of the atmosphere has moved from the day-side to just west of the anti-stellar point, where the divergent day-night winds converge. Further, this night-side hot-spot, and the resulting temperature gradients, drive a significant equatorial wind from the night-side to the day-side, which appears in the zonal-mean zonal-wind profile as part of the jet, despite it not forming in the same way as the classical hot Jupiter zonal-mean equatorial jet. In part, these differences may occur due to differences in the behaviour of Rossby waves, and barotropic and baroclinic instabilities, as the Rossby deformation radius approaches the planetary radius (Mitchell & Vallis 2010).

If robust, the formation of this night-side hot spot, which occurs for all of our HD209458b-like models that fall into the slowly rotating regime, may have important implications for our understanding of the dynamics of such objects. For example, as discussed in Sect. 3.5 and shown in Fig. 7a, the night-side hot-spot is associated with a thermal inversion, the presence of which might have strong implications for both the observed phase curve (depending upon the wavelength or molecule observed, and hence the pressure probed) as well as the chemistry, since the inversion can act as a cold-trap, leading to condensation (rain-out) and hence changing the, observable, composition of the atmosphere (that in turn may effect the thermal structure due to changes in absorption and emission). We note that, as discussed above, this feature is common to all our slowly rotating regime models, and, in fact, its presence is almost a defining feature of the slowly rotating regime. This is because, as $\Omega$ increases, rotational influences shape the day-night flow, shifting the hot-spot even further westwards, away from the anti-stellar point and towards the terminator, until it eventually combines with the eastwards advected day-side hot-spot, leading to the formation of the thermal butterfly that is emblematic of the classical hot-Jupiter regime at a transitional rotation rate of around $\Omega = 0.5 \rightarrow 0.6\Omega_0$. This shift in the location of the hot-spot is

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7.** Latitudinally averaged (over a latitudinal band spanning $\pm 10^\circ$ of the equator) T-P profiles for three HD209458b-like models at different rotation rates: 0.125$\Omega_0$ (top), 1$\Omega_0$ (middle), and 15$\Omega_0$ (bottom). Each plot includes profiles from six different longitudes, ranging from the sub-stellar point (whose equilibrium profile is shown in red) eastwards to the anti-stellar point (whose equilibrium profile is shown in blue) on the night-side. Here we have excluded the deepest regions of the atmosphere ($P > 50$bar) from our plots so as to emphasise the changes that occur with longitude at lower pressures, whilst still showing how the deep atmospheric heating changes (compared to the initial adiabat, shown as a dark grey dash) with rotation rate.</figcaption></figure>

in agreement with the Spitzer phase curve observations analysed by May et al. (2022), which revealed (as shown in their Figure 10) an increasing trend of hot-spot off set with increasing orbital period (i.e. decreasing synchronous rotation rate). They even found a slight westward shift at the most rapid rotation rates, a shift which might correspond to the off-equator westwards advection that we find in the rapidly rotating regime (see below).

Moving into the classical hot Jupiter regime, which we plot on the middle column of Fig. 6, we find dynamics that are in good agreement with previous studies of hot Jupiters, such as Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2019). For example, in the outer atmosphere (Fig. 6b), we find slight advection from the day-side towards the eastern terminator, forming ‘wings’ that: a) trace the off-equator divergent and convergent flows, which are increasingly rotationally influenced, and hence have become
longitudinally asymmetric, with eastern flows compressed and, higher latitude, western flows stretched longitudinally; and b) will eventually form, deeper in the atmosphere, a key part of the thermal butterfly structure that is synonymous with the classical regime. This structure is also known as a global ‘chevron’ pattern (Showman & Polvani 2011). We also find that, unlike in the slowly rotating regime, super-rotating flows are present at all longitudes on the equator, albeit with the proviso that winds west of the sub-stellar point are slightly suppressed or weakened by the divergent component of the wind (see Sect. 3.4).

Evidence for the formation of foreshadowed thermal butterfly increases as we move deeper, Fig. 6e, with the influence that rotation has on the dynamics also becoming increasingly clear. For example, the high latitude flows have become increasingly asymmetric, shifting the ‘wings’ associated with convergent flows closer towards the terminator and the day-side hot-spot. Together with the growing strength of the equatorial jet at all longitudes (although it does remain slightly weaker just west of the sub-stellar point) which drives the eastward advection (by approximately 20°) of the near equator day-side hot-spot, we are starting to see the basis of the structure that will form the thermal butterfly.

A structure that becomes apparent as we move into the mid atmosphere (0.2bar; see Fig. 6h), where we find that the day-side hot-spot is now located ~ 50° east of the sub-stellar point. Interestingly, we also find a secondary peak in the temperature even further east, across the terminator and on the night-side. This is a remnant of the ‘wings’ seen at lower pressures and can also be considered as a sign that the off-equator heat transport was sufficiently rotationally influenced as to prevent the formation of the night-side hot-spot found in the slowly rotating regime. Further, whilst the off-equator flows are mostly hidden by the equatorial jet, the visible remnants suggest that, at high latitudes, the easterly circulation that previously had been confined to the day-side has been almost completely suppressed, leaving only a westerly day-night flow, which appears in the zonal-mean zonal-wind as a counterflow (Fig. 1b). We note that, as we increase the rotation rate in the classical regime, the influence of rotation grows, with off-equator flows playing an increasing role in shaping the circulation, leading to westward and poleward advection at mid-latitudes and more distinct ‘wings’ to the thermal butterfly.

This rotational influence becomes increasingly apparent as we move into the rapidly rotating regime, which we plot on the right-hand column of Fig. 6. Here, in the outer atmosphere (Fig. 6c) we find that the off-equator wind dynamics are very strongly suppressed (by the Coriolis effect), particularly on the cold night-side, resulting in only a weak day-side circulation from west of the sub-stellar point to the east via mid-latitudes. This leaves the strong super-rotating equatorial jet as the dominant flow, but even this is influenced by rotation, with the jet being visibly narrower than its classical regime counterpart. Consequently, this highly rotationally confined wind structure drives thermal advection that is limited to equatorial regions, with weak eastwards advection at the equator (weak due to the reduced jet speed that latitudinally confined standing waves can drive), weak westwards advection at low latitudes, and basically no heat transport at high latitudes (i.e. above ± ~ 30°). This weak low-latitude westwards advection may explain the slight westward phase curve offset found for short orbital period hot Jupiters by May et al. (2022).

Moving deeper, Figs. 6f and 6i, we find a very similar structure but with one significant difference: As the radiative forcing weakens, the eastwards equatorial and westwards low-latitude

advection strengthens, leading to stronger zonal mixing, such as the band of equatorial day-night heating found at 0.2 bar (Fig. 6i). Further, as we move even deeper into the atmosphere, this zonal mixing grows, leading to an equatorial warm band between five and 20bar. Moving to even faster rotation rates, we find that both the equatorial jet, as well as the low-latitude counterflows become increasingly latitudinally confined, which has implications for not only the thermal structure, but also the strength of the zonal winds (as we discuss in Sect. 3.4), and hence the vertical transport of potential-temperature (as we discuss in Sect. 3.5).

### 3.4. Helmholtz wind decomposition

Our above analysis has revealed that the horizontal winds are highly sensitive to both rotation rate and pressure (which acts as a proxy for the relative influence of radiative forcing to advective transport). In order to disentangle these effects, we turn to the Helmholtz wind decomposition, which has long been a staple of Earth atmospheric studies (Dutton 1986), and which has recently been applied to both hot Jupiters (Hammond & Lewis 2021) and tidally-locked rocky exoplanets (Sergeev et al. 2022).

Briefly, a Helmholtz decomposition can be used to split the horizontal wind at a select pressure level (or over an averaged pressure range), $u = (u, v)$, into divergent (i.e. ‘vorticity free’) and rotational (i.e. ‘divergence free’) components (Dutton 1986):

$$u = u_d + u_r \quad (8)$$

$$= -\nabla\chi + k \times \nabla\psi, \quad (9)$$

where $k$ denotes the unit vector in the (eastward) zonal direction, $\chi$ is the velocity potential function, $\psi$ is the velocity stream-function, and both $\chi$ and $\psi$ can be linked to the divergence $\delta$ / vorticity $W$ directly:

$$\nabla^2 \chi = \delta \quad (10)$$

$$\nabla^2 \psi = W. \quad (11)$$

Additionally, in order to isolate the equatorial super-rotating jet from any other rotational wind dynamics it may be masking, we further split the rotational component, $u_r$ into a zonal-mean component $u_z$ and an eddy-wind component $u_e$:

$$u_z = \langle u_r \rangle \quad (12)$$

$$u_e = u_r - u_z, \quad (13)$$

where $\langle \rangle$ indicates the zonal-mean.

As for exactly what these components represent for a tidally-locked atmosphere: $u_d$ represents flows that diverge from the hot-spot on the day-side and converge somewhere on the cold night-side, forming a closed cycle when combined with an upwelling below the day-side hot-spot and the resulting downwelling on the nightside; $u_r$ represents dynamics driven by angular momentum transport via stationary Rossby and Kelvin waves. In typical hot Jupiters these standing waves transport angular momentum from mid-latitudes to the equator, resulting in slight westward flows at mid-latitudes and a super-rotating flow (jet) at the equator (Showman & Polvani 2011); and finally, as mentioned above, $u_e$ and $u_z$ represent a further decomposition of $u_r$, allowing us to explore the transport by standing waves in cases where the presence of a super-rotating equatorial jet would completely dominate the dynamics.

In Fig. 8, we plot $u_d$ (top), $u_r$ (middle), and $u_e$ (bottom), for the three different rotation rates discussed in Sect. 3.1, in order
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 8.** Helmholtz decomposition of the radially averaged (over the outer and mid atmosphere) horizontal wind of three, synchronous, HD 209458b-like atmospheric models with rotation rates ranging from 0.125Ω₀ to 15Ω₀. The top row plots the divergent component (H<sub>div</sub>) of the Helmholtz decomposition, the middle row plots the rotational component (H<sub>rot</sub>) of the decomposition, and the bottom row shows the eddy component (H<sub>eddy</sub> = H<sub>rot</sub> - ⟨H<sub>rot</sub>⟩) of the decomposition. We note the change (decrease) in RMS mean velocity as the rotation rate increases.</figcaption></figure>

to investigate how the balance between different components of the radially averaged (over the mid and outer atmosphere where P < 1 bar) horizontal winds changes with rotation rate. We start by analysing the winds in the slowly rotating regime, which is plotted in the left column of Fig. 8. Here, our analysis reveals that, in the outer and mid atmosphere, the primary component that makes up the total horizontal wind is the divergent component (|**u**<sub>d</sub>| = 554 ms<sup>-1</sup>), which is, on average, a factor of two faster than the rotational component (|**u**<sub>r</sub>| = 279 ms<sup>-1</sup>). This makes sense, and is in good agreement with the wind structure discussed in Sect. 3.1. To start, off-equator, we find flows that trace the dominant, divergent, day-side to night-side flow (compare Figs. 8a and 6a), and that are driven by the strong radiative forcing and day-night temperature gradient. Whereas

at the equator, we find that the zonal wind associated with
rotational dynamics opposes the divergent wind west of the sub-
stellar point whilst also reinforcing the flow to the east, leading
to to observed asymmetry in equatorial wind speed. Decompos-
ing the rotational wind further reveals the driving force behind
this equatorial jet. As shown in Fig. 8g, the eddy component
of the wind consists of an *m* = 1 circulation structure (i.e.
two circulation cells per hemisphere), a structure that is asso-
ciated with Kelvin and Rossby standing waves and which is
commonly attributed as being the driving mechanism behind
super-rotating jets on hot Jupiters (Showman & Polvani 2011).
Briefly, this mechanism works as follows: longitudinal variations
in the radiative forcing (i.e. the strong day-night temperature con-
trast) trigger the formation of standing, planetary-scale, Rossby
and Kelvin waves, with the Kelvin waves straddling the equator, and the Rossby waves lying at mid latitudes (with their exact location depending upon the rotation rate). Rotational effects (i.e. Coriolis forces) then cause this standing wave pattern to tilt, with a northwest-southwest tilt in the northern hemisphere and a southwest-northeast tilt in the southern hemisphere. These tilted standing waves pump eastwards angular momentum from mid-latitudes to the equator, inducing equatorial superrotation and mid-latitude counterflows. This tilt is essential to the aforementioned angular momentum transport mechanism and hence an equatorial jet is typically only found at more rapid rotation rates (Fig. 8h-l).

As we increase the rotation rate and move into the classical hot Jupiter regime, shown in the middle column of Fig. 8, we find that the balance has shifted in favour of the rotational component ($|u_r| = 692$ ms⁻¹, where $|x|$ indicates the RMS mean of $x$) over the divergent component ($|u_d| = 241$ ms⁻¹), with the eddy component (Fig. 8h; $|u_e| = 283$ ms⁻¹) starting to exhibit signs of the titled standing wave pattern associated with a strong rotationally influenced zonal jet, as seen in Fig. 8e and Sect. 3.1. This dominance of rotation driven dynamics is also reflected in the thermal and wind structures shown in Fig. 6. For example, comparing Fig. 8e with Fig. 6b/f/g reveals the thermal butterfly formation mechanism: a strong jet that drives equatorial advection whilst the $m = 1$ circulations drives the formation of the off-equator temperature wings east of the sub-stellar point as well as the slightly cooler point found on the equator just behind the tip of the butterfly. Both of these features are associated with the rotational wind, with the divergent wind (Fig. 8b) only acting to slightly slowdown or speedup the jet west or east of the sub-stellar point respectively.

Moving into the rapidly rotating regime, as shown on right-hand column of Fig. 8, we start to see strong evidence of the Coriolis driven reshaping of the winds. For example, we find that the rotational wind ($|u_r| = 377$ ms⁻¹) completely dominates the divergent wind ($|u_d| = 40$ ms⁻¹), leading to a divergent wind whose contributions are insignificant at all but the lowest of pressures where radiative forcing dominates. However this change has not come about because of an enhancement of the rotational wind (which is slower here than either slower rotation regime), rather we find that Coriolis effects have started to seriously suppress off-equator flows, essentially destroying the divergent wind and leaving a highly latitudinally compressed and extremely titled eddy wind (Fig. 8i; $|u_e| = 98$ ms⁻¹) that struggles to generate a broad zonal jet, but does still manage to drive at least some off-equator advection east of the sub-stellar point (e.g. Fig. 6c). Evidence for this compression can be seen in Fig. 1c, where we find that the off-equator counter flows associated with the standing wave pattern have moved to low latitudes. We also find that, off-equator, both components of the wind are notably weaker on the night-side than the day-side, an effect that we attribute to the tilt of the eddy winds and the standing wave pattern leading to a preferred direction for circulations and essentially zero night-side flow.

It is worth mentioning that the compression and suppression of the off-equator flows only grows in strength as we increase the rotation rate further. This has devastating consequences for overall zonal advection and transport: as the standing-wave structure gets further compressed (suppressed) by Coriolis forces, its ability to pump off-axis, eastwards, angular momentum towards the equator is reduced, resulting in a slight slowdown in equatorial jet speeds, as shown in Fig. 4a, as well as a narrowing of the jet, as shown in Fig. 3b. Together this leads

to a significant reduction is zonal transport except at the equator, the effects of which can be seen in Fig. 6. As we discuss below, this can have significant consequences for the vertical advection of enthalpy in rapidly rotating atmospheres, and may help to explain the lack of inflation observed in such objects.

### 3.5. Enthalpy transport

We expect differences in the horizontal, and hence vertical, wind dynamics to also manifest as significant differences in horizontal and vertical energy transport. In order to explore this, we consider the enthalpy flux:

$$F_H(r, \theta, \phi) = \rho c_p T U(r, \theta, \phi), \quad (14)$$

where $\rho$ is the density, $T$ is the temperature, and $c_p$ is the specific heat. We plot the zonal, meridional, and vertical enthalpy flux for select pressure levels, chosen to emphasise differences in outer and deep atmosphere transport, for our three dynamical regimes in Figs. 9 and 10.

Starting in the slowly rotating regime, shown in the top row of Figs. 9 and 10, we find that the zonal and meridional transport in the outer atmosphere (Fig. 9a/c) is dominated by the divergent day-night wind, with eastward or westward enthalpy transport east and west of the sub-stellar point respectively, and polewards or equatorwards meridional transport on the day and night side respectively. Taken together, these flows suggest that enthalpy is transported from the irradiated day-side to slightly west of the anti-stellar point on the night-side, i.e. exactly where the night-side hot-spot eventually forms (Fig. 6d).

In order to better demonstrate the vertical advection of potential temperature in the outer atmosphere, and in particular the role that vertical winds play in forming the night-side hot-spot in the slowly rotating regime, we also plot longitudinal slices of the vertical wind, temperature, and vertical enthalpy flux in Fig. 11. For example, we can see how vertical transport by a strong night-side downflow, and the associated adiabatic heating, leads to the formation of a hot-spot at around 0.2 to 0.5 bar in the slowly rotating regime. We can also see slight evidence for heating at pressures above the hot-spot as energy is deposited by the descending fluid parcels. Overall, we find a global overturning circulation, with a significant upwelling on the day-side and the aforementioned downwelling on the night side. This is typical of atmospheres whose dynamics are shaped by divergent flows. We find a similar overturning circulation in the classical hot Jupiter and rapidly rotating regimes, although here the advective heat transport is either deep (in the classical regime) or weak (in the rapidly rotating regime). This is in agreement with the differences in deep heating rates found between the three rotational regimes.

The impact that the night-side hot-spot has on enthalpy transport becomes even more apparent at higher pressures. For example, in the mid-atmosphere, the zonal enthalpy transport (Fig. 9b) is now no longer controlled just by the divergent day-night flows (although divergence driven dynamics remain dominant at high latitudes). Instead, we find significant, equatorial, enthalpy transport eastwards from the night-side towards the day-side (sub-stellar point), driven by the 'reversed' day-night temperature difference. This night to day transport essentially acts to close the overturning-like circulation described above, which has important implications for the deep atmosphere. Specifically, it means that the deep atmosphere is relatively quiescent and not as strongly linked to the outer atmosphere, leading to weak vertical enthalpy transport at high pressures
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 9.** Maps showing the zonal, meridional, and vertical enthalpy transport at select pressure levels for three exemplary HD 209458b-like models with rotation rates of 0.125Ω₀ (top), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (bottom). Here, positive (red) fluxes represent eastward, polar, or outwards flows for the zonal, meridional, or vertical enthalpy flux maps respectively.</figcaption></figure>

(e.g. Fig. 10c, where we find a vertical enthalpy flux an order of magnitude smaller than the flux found in the classical hot Jupiter regime; see Fig. 10f) and hence the suppression of advectively driven radius inflation (Fig. 7a). Evidence for this can be seen in both Figs. 12a and 12d, which show the vertical enthalpy transport against pressure for various longitudes and the global mean respectively. Here we find a significant vertical enthalpy flux in the mid-atmosphere, around the same pressure as the night-side hot-spot, as well as a net (global mean) downward enthalpy flux in the deep atmosphere. We note that, despite the similarities in enthalpy flux magnitudes in local regions (compare Fig. 12a and Fig. 12b), we find that overall (i.e. when taking the global mean, i.e. calculating the net flux), the downward enthalpy advection is almost an order of magnitude lower here than in the classical hot Jupiter regime (compare Figs. 12d and 12e). This can be linked to the different vertical wind structures that

the different horizontal wind profiles drive, see for example the much narrower downflow in Fig. 10a as opposed to Fig. 10d.

Finally, we note that the results of this enthalpy transport are clearly visible in the T-P profiles of the mid and outer atmosphere, as shown in Fig. 7a. For example, on the night-side between ~0.05 → ~2bar we find clear evidence of the night-side hot-spot, including the significant cold-trap associated with the thermal inversion. We also find a reduced day-night temperature difference, suggesting that divergent day-night energy transport is highly efficient in the outer atmosphere, and that the day-night contrast of hot Jupiters might be sensitive to rotation rate. This is in agreement with the analytic shallow-water models of Perez-Becker & Showman (2013), which showed that the day-night temperature contrast should increase with rotation rate (i.e. as the efficient overturning circulation is suppressed by rotational effects).
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 10.** Continued from previous page: Maps showing the zonal, meridional, and vertical enthalpy transport at select pressure levels for three exemplary HD 209458b-like models with rotation rates of 0.125Ω₀ (top), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (bottom). Here, positive (red) fluxes represent eastward, polewards, or outwards flows for the zonal, meridional, or vertical enthalpy flux maps respectively.</figcaption></figure>

Moving onto the classical hot Jupiter regime, which we plot on the middle row of Figs. 9, 10, and 11, we find that the primary driver of enthalpy transport is now the rotational component of the wind. For example, at low pressures, we find that both the zonal and meridional enthalpy transport (Fig. 9d/g) traces the eddy component of the wind (Fig. 8h). As a result we find a significant asymmetry between westwards and eastwards day-night enthalpy transport. Westwards of the sub-stellar point we find broad poleward transport that crosses the entire night-side, whereas eastwards of the sub-stellar point we find a much more longitudinally constrained profile linked with the off-equator wings that from in the outer and mid atmosphere (e.g. Fig. 6e). In turn, these off-equator wings are associated with a strong downward vertical enthalpy transport (Fig. 10d)

that is somewhat balanced by a broad upwelling near the sub-stellar point and to the east of the off-equator wings (Fig. 10e). Together forming a global circulation reminiscent of the global ‘overturning’ circulation.

However unlike in the slowly rotating regime, we find that this global ‘overturning’ circulation extends deep into the atmosphere, where radiative forcing is weak, thus connecting the outer and deep atmospheres, and allowing for deep heating (Figs. 7b and 11f). As for the reason why this circulation penetrates deeper into the atmosphere, this is because of the strong, deep zonal jet that drives strong mixing near the equator, matching what we find in the meridional circulation streamfunction (Fig. 5b). Evidence for this deeper zonal jet can be seen in Fig. 9e, which reveals strong eastwards advection near the
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 11.** Maps showing longitudinal slices of the Vertical Wind (left), Temperature (middle), and Vertical Enthalpy Flux (right), at the equator, for three exemplary HD209458b-like models with rotation rates of 0.125Ω₀ (top), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (bottom). Here we have confined our plots to pressures less than 0.26 bar in order to emphasise the dynamics and transport in the outer and mid atmosphere, particularly at pressure levels similar to those at which the night-side hot-spot forms. We note the difference in scale for the vertical enthalpy flux in our 15Ω₀ case, emphasising the weaker vertical transport, even at the equator, in the rapidly rotating regime.</figcaption></figure>

at all longitudes, paired with weak off-equator transport linked to the equatorward pumping of eastwards angular momentum from mid-latitudes.

Overall, these strong zonal and equatorial dynamics drive significant vertical enthalpy transport, as shown in Figs. 10f, 11f, and 12b/e, where we find the highest net (global-mean) downwards vertical enthalpy of our three regimes. A strong enthalpy flux that drives significant deep heating (see Fig. 7b and the dashed line in the deep atmosphere which shows the initial adiabat), suggesting that the planet is inflated relative to both more slowly rotating hot Jupiters and 1D atmospheric models (Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019).

Finally we come to the rapidly rotating regime, which we plot on the bottom row of Figs. 9, 10, and 11. Here we find that advective heat transport has become increasingly confined to low latitudes, with the equatorial jet acting as the main source of horizontal transport at almost all pressures. For example, in the outer atmosphere, Fig. 9g/k, we find horizontal enthalpy transport that is either driven by the jet (zonally) or by the very highly

tilted and latitudinally constrained *m* = 1 standing wave pattern (meridional). The jet transports enthalpy eastwards from the sub-stellar point, across the night-side, leading to the band of equatorial heating and mixing seen in Fig. 6i, whilst the tilted standing wave primarily drives transport on the day-side (poleward and westward advection west of the sub-stellar point and equatorward and eastward advection to the east) and leads to the warped, compressed, thermal butterfly also seen in Fig. 6i.

The influence of rotation on the enthalpy transport is also evident in the vertical enthalpy flow that is highly confined to low-latitude (i.e. equatorial) regions. For example, as shown in Fig. 10g both the days-side upwelling and night-side downflow are confined to be within ~20° of the equator, which explains the lack of high-latitude downflows found at low Rossby numbers (Fig. 4b). Further, due to the day-side confinement of the off-equator circulations, we find that the night-side downflows tend to be closer to the terminators and day-side than in the more slowly rotating regimes, although this changes as we move deeper into the atmosphere and the downflows become more
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 12. Longitudinal variations (top) and global means (bottom) of the vertical enthalpy flux $F_H$ profiles for three exemplary HD 209458b-like models: 0.125Ω₀ (left), Ω₀ (middle), and 15Ω₀ (right). In the top row, we plot vertical enthalpy flux profiles at five different longitudes, ranging from the sub-stellar point to just west of the anti-stellar point, as well as the mean enthalpy flux profile. However, since the mean flux is significantly smaller than the local fluxes, we replot the mean profiles in the bottom row such as to better demonstrate the vertical variations in enthalpy transport.</figcaption></figure>

tightly associated with a zonally uniform zonal jet, as seen in Figs. 10h/i and 9h. Evidence for this confinement of the downflows to the day-side can be seen in the left-hand column of Fig. 11.

Overall, the Coriolis driven confinement of the horizontal and vertical enthalpy fluxes has a suppressing effect on the driving of deep atmospheric heating. That is to say that we find that, as shown in Fig. 12c downward enthalpy advection is significantly weaker than both of the other regimes considered here, suggesting that deep heating, and hence radius inflation, should be strongly suppressed. And the global-mean deep T-P profile confirms that this is indeed the case. However, if we confine our investigation of the deep atmosphere to equatorial regions, as we do in Figs. 11i and 7c, we do find slight hints of deep heating. This occurs because the local vertical enthalpy advection is orders of magnitude stronger near the equator than elsewhere (see Fig. 10h/i), and the latitudinal confinement for the off-equator circulations mean that latitudinal mixing is weak. With time, this mixing might lead to global heating of the deep atmosphere, albeit to a much lesser extent than in the classical regime, however a quick test with even weak radiative forcing back towards the initial adiabat (designed to reproduce the slight radiative cooling of the hot deep atmosphere) is more than enough to prevent this heating. As such, we feel confident in arguing that models in the rapid rotation regime should show little to no radius inflation, in agreement with the SDSS1411b results of Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2021). The slight northward shift of the downward enthalpy flux seen in Fig. 10h/i is driven by the slight asymmetry in the zonal winds, as seen in Fig. 1c.

### 3.6. The Rossby deformation radius and Rhines length scales

We finish by briefly comparing our three rotational regimes to those proposed by Haqq-Misra et al. (2018) for terrestrial exoplanets. Haqq-Misra et al. (2018) use the non-dimensional Rossby Deformation Radius,

$$R_{Rossby} = \frac{NH}{2\Omega R_p}, \qquad (15)$$

where H is the atmospheric scale height and N is the Brunt–Väisälä Frequency, and the Rhine Length,

$$R_{Rhine} = \frac{1}{R_p} \sqrt{\frac{U_{rms} R_p}{2\Omega}}, \qquad (16)$$

to define three dynamical regimes. The slow rotation regime when both the normalised Rossby deformation radius ($R_{Rossby}$) and Rhine length ($R_{Rhine}$) are > 1, the Rhine rotation regime when $R_{Rossby} > 1$ and $R_{Rhine} < 1$, and the rapidly rotating regime when both $R_{Rossby} < 1$ and $R_{Rhine} < 1$. They also propose a fourth regime when $R_{Rossby} < 1$ and $R_{Rhine} > 1$, although none of their models fall into this regime. Each of these regimes are characterised by different dynamics, including global overturning circulation in the slowly rotating regime, significant equatorial super rotation in the rapidly rotating regime, and a mix of dynamics in the Rhines regime. These regimes are broadly in line with the regimes we discuss here with a global overturning circulation that dominates for slow rotators ($\Omega < 0.5\Omega_0$) and a
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 13.** Comparison of the maximum normalised Rossby deformation radius ($R_{Rossby}$) and Rhines length ($R_{Rhine}$) for eight of our synchronously rotating HD 209458b-like atmospheric models which span the three rotation regimes discussed here. This figure can be compared with Figure 4 of Haqq-Misra et al. (2018).</figcaption></figure>

zonal-jet driven by the standing Rossby and Kelvin waves that dominates for rapid rotators ($\Omega \gtrsim 5\Omega_0$). However at intermediate rotation rates, our ‘classical’ hot Jupiter regime, instead of our models falling into the Rhines rotator regime, we instead fall into their theoretical fourth regime which, like the Rhines rotator regime, is characterised by a combination of a global overturning circulation and a standing-wave driven jet. This alignment with the regimes of Haqq-Misra et al. (2018) can be seen in Fig. 13, where we plot the maximum values of the normalised Rossby deformation radius and Rhines length for eight of our synchronous models that span the three rotation regimes.

It is important to note that both the Rossby deformation radius and the Rhines length become very short in the rapidly rotating regime. In fact, depending upon the location in which the Rhines length is calculated, for our most rapidly rotating model ($\Omega = 40\Omega_0$) the Rhines length can approach the resolution of our model: if we consider the global root mean square velocity ($U_{rms}$), we find that $R_{Rhine} = 2.5^\circ$, which is essentially identical to the horizontal extent of a grid cell in our models. However this value is so low in part because much of the atmosphere is quiescent in the rapidly rotating regime due to the suppression of off-equator motions by Coriolis forces. As such, if we instead constrain our calculation of $U_{rms}$ to winds within ten degrees of the equator, we find that $R_{Rhine} = 6.0^\circ$, which we can resolve, if only just.

Consequently, given the interesting dynamics found here, we suggest that future studies investigate the rapidly rotating regime at a significantly higher resolution in order to fully capture all scales of the atmospheric dynamics at all latitudes.

## 4. Non-synchronous rotation

Many of the dynamics found in the synchronously rotating regime (Sect. 3) rely on the presence of an $m = 1$ standing wave (Fig. 8), which develops thanks to the strong, persistent, day-night forcing associated tidally-locked irradiation (Showman & Polvani 2011). However for warm Jupiters with longer orbital radii (i.e. $a = 0.2au$ for a Sun-like star, like HD 209458A, even closer for an M-Dwarf), the synchronisation time-scale starts to approach the system age.

Thus there is a strong possibility that next-generation exoplanet hunting missions will start to detect warm and hot Jupiters whose rotation period is not perfectly synchronised with their orbital period. This might have profound implications for their atmospheric dynamics. As such, we next explore how both small and large differences between the orbital and rotation period (i.e. non-synchronicity) affect the dynamics and resulting heat transport of such objects. Here our models fall into two regimes: the first is models in which the difference between the orbital ($\Omega_{orb}$) and rotation ($\Omega_{rot}$) angular rotation rates is a fraction of the overall rotation rate (e.g. $\Omega_{rot} = 0.9\Omega_{orb} = 0.9\Omega_0$; more generally when the difference is less than ~15% of the rotation rate. Here this is the rotation rate of HD209458b), and the effect of non-synchronicity is relatively minor. And the second regime is when the difference is significant (e.g. $\Omega_{rot} = 4\Omega_{orb} = 4\Omega_0$), on the order of or greater than either the orbital or angular rotation rate, leading to significant disruption of the driving mechanisms discussed in Sect. 3. This work builds upon the non-synchronous models of, for example, Showman et al. (2009, 2015) by more thoroughly exploring the non-synchronous parameter space and investigating the effects of non-synchronous rotation on the vertical energy transport.

### 4.1. Zonal-mean zonal-winds

We start by exploring how the zonal-mean zonal-wind changes as we increase the difference between the rotational and orbital angular rotation rates (i.e. as we increase the non-synchronicity). To that end we plot, on the top row of Fig. 14 the zonal-mean zonal-wind for models with both a small difference between the orbital and rotational angular rotation rates ($\Omega_{rot} = 0.9\Omega_{orb} = 0.9\Omega_0$, weakly non-synchronous) and a large difference ($\Omega_{rot} = 4\Omega_{orb} = 4.0\Omega_0$, highly non-synchronous). Further, to aid in our comparisons, we also plot models with the same rotation rates, but with their orbital periods adjusted such that the rotation is once again synchronous ($\Omega_{rot} = \Omega_{orb} = 0.9\Omega_0$ on the left and $\Omega_{rot} = \Omega_{orb} = 0.9\Omega_0$ on the right).

We start in the weakly non-synchronous regime, where we find a zonal-mean zonal-wind (Fig. 14a) that is very similar to its synchronously rotating counterpart (Fig. 14c), with differences on the order of that found when changing the averaging period of the temporal mean. This suggests that, when the difference between the rotational and orbital periods is small, the day-night temperature forcing that develops due to the strong stellar irradiation is sufficient to drive a long-lived standing Rossby and Kevin wave pattern leading to the development of a super-rotating jet equivalent to that found in the synchronous regime. This is consistent with the super-synchronous (1.5 times; see Figure 14) models of Showman et al. (2009).

However as we increase the difference between the orbital and rotational angular rotation rates, we find that the differences between non-synchronous (Fig. 14b) and synchronous (Fig. 14d) models with the same planetary rotation rate starts to grow. In this highly non-synchronous regime, we find that: a) both eastwards (equatorial jet) and westwards (mid-latitude) winds are slower than in the synchronous regime and b) the weak eastwards equatorial jet that does develop is notably shallower than its synchronous counterpart, which in turn implies that vertical enthalpy advection (heat transported) will be suppressed (see Sect. 4.2 and 4.4). These changes suggest that the time-dependent shift in the outer atmospheric irradiation (caused by the difference between the rotational and orbital period) hampers the formation of the standing wave pattern that drives both on and off-equator dynamics. We investigate the exact nature of
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>(a) $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.9\Omega_0$ - Non-Synchronous</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>(c) $\Omega = 0.9\Omega_0$ - Synchronous</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>(b) $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4.0\Omega_0$ - Non-Synchronous</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>(d) $\Omega = 4.0\Omega_0$ - Synchronous</figcaption></figure>

**Fig. 14.** Zonally and temporally, over five Earth years of simulation time, averaged zonal wind profiles for four HD 209458b-like models, two of which are non-synchronously rotating (top) and two of which are synchronously rotating (bottom), with rotation rates chosen to fall into our weak-non-synchronicity (left; $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.9\Omega_{\text{orb}} = 0.9\Omega_0$ in the non-synchronous model and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = \Omega_{\text{orb}} = 0.9\Omega_0$ in its synchronous equivalent) and strong-non-synchronicity (right; $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4\Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4.0\Omega_0$ in the non-synchronous model and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = \Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4.0\Omega_0$ in its synchronous equivalent) regimes.

these changes in Sect. 4.3. This shift is similar to that found by Showman et al. (2009), a slower, shallower, equatorial jet driven by a (then) theorised weakening in standing wave driven dynamics. Furthermore, like Showman et al. (2009), we also find that a high latitude and low pressure eastward flows form when the angular rotation rate significantly exceeds the orbital rotations rate. Although here our flows are slower, likely as a result of differences in the radiative treatment.

We can better understand how a difference between the rotational and orbital periods can affect the shape and speed of the zonal jet by looking at the latitudinal variations in the zonal-mean outer atmosphere wind, as shown in Fig. 15. Comparing this with Fig. 3b, we can see that, when the level of non-synchronicity is small (e.g. $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.9\Omega_{\text{orb}}$), the jet closely resembles that found in the synchronous regime. However as the difference between the rotational and orbital periods grows, things start to change, with both the peak jet speed and jet width decreasing. Eventually we reach the point ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4.0\Omega_{\text{orb}}$) that off-equator counterflows have almost dropped to zero, which reinforces our conclusion that it is a lack of off-equator standing-waves that leads to the lack of a strong super-rotating jet in highly non-synchronous atmospheres.

The influence of rotation can also be seen in Fig. 15, with models in which we double or half the rotation rate with respect

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 15.** Longitudinally averaged zonal wind profiles in the outer atmospheres ($P \approx 0.016\text{bar}$) of four non-synchronous HD 209458b-like models, with rotation rates ($\Omega_{\text{rot}}$) chosen to fall into our weak-non-synchronicity ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.9\Omega_0$, green, and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 2.0\Omega_0$, teal) and strong-non-synchronicity ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.5\Omega_0$, yellow, and $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4.0\Omega_0$, orange) regimes.

to the orbital period showing similar peak jet speeds and off-equator flows, but different jet widths. The jet appears wider in
<figure><img src="image_21.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 16.** Zonally and temporally, over five Earth years of simulation time, averaged meridional circulation streamfunctions for four HD 209458b-like models: two non-synchronous models (top), one in the weak-non-synchronicity regime (left) and one on the strong-non-synchronicity regime (right), paired with two synchronous models at the same rotation rates (bottom).</figcaption></figure>

the more slowly rotating model due to the increased influence of divergent winds on the dynamics, as was seen in the synchronous regime (Sect. 3.4). A similar story holds true for the cases discussed here. For example, our model with $\Omega_{rot} = 1.1\Omega_{orb}$ is very similar to the case with $\Omega_{rot} = 0.9\Omega_{orb}$, just with a slightly narrower jet. This is because, in both cases, the level of non-synchronicity is low so the main driver of differences is the relative influence of rotation.

## 4.2. Meridional circulation

We next explore how the changes induced by a difference between the rotational and orbital angular rotation rates impacts the meridional mass stream-function, as shown in Fig. 16. As was the case for the zonal-mean zonal-wind, when the difference between the rotational and orbital periods is small (i.e. in the weakly non-synchronous regime), we find a circulation profile that is broadly equivalent to that found in for a synchronous model (Fig. 5), just a little weaker. In turn, this suggests that vertical enthalpy advection, and hence deep heating, should remain significant. We explore if this is the case below (Sect. 4.4).

However, as the difference between the rotational and orbital periods grows, the above no longer holds true. Whilst we do find general agreement, visually, with our equivalently rotating synchronous model, including the development of an additional circulation cells in each hemisphere as the influence of rotation increases, we also find that the strength of these circulations

is significantly reduced, reaching a peak difference of almost two orders of magnitude. Furthermore, when we look at snapshots instead of the temporal average, we find that the circulation is highly time dependent, particularly in the deep atmosphere. Taken together, these two factors suggest that the vertical advection of enthalpy is likely to be significantly suppressed as the difference between the rotational and orbital periods grows.

## 4.3. Horizontal-wind and temperature maps

In order to better understand how differences between the rotational and orbital periods impact the dynamics, we next explore how the horizontal wind and temperatures profiles in the outer atmosphere (where the influence of the time-dependent radiative forcing profile is likely to be largest) change with increasing non-synchronicity. Briefly, when the difference between the orbital and rotational periods is small, we find a wind and temperature structure that is almost identical to that found in the classical hot Jupiter regime. This includes a strong equatorial jet which is driven by off-equator $m = 1$ standing wave circulations, as well as the classical thermal butterfly. We note that we find slightly more asymmetry in the flows here than in the synchronous case, asymmetry that we attribute to the time-dependent radiative forcing profile at least slightly disrupting the $m = 1$ standing wave structure. Other evidence for the time-dependent radiative forcing can be found in the temperature profile of the non-synchronous mean night-side, which is a hint hotter here than in
<figure><img src="image_22.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 17.** Temporally averaged, over five Earth years of simulation time, zonal wind (arrows) and temperature maps at three different pressures (0.0026 bar, left, 0.016 bar, centre, and 0.2 bar, right) for a non-synchronous HD 209458b-like model in which the difference between the rotational and orbital periods is large ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4\Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4\Omega_0$). Here we have forgone showing the weakly non-synchronous regime as we have already established its similarity to its synchronous equivalent. We note that the x-axis of these plots is relative-longitude, indicating that we have taken the temporal mean of the wind and temperature in the frame of reference of the irradiation.</figcaption></figure>

an equivalent synchronous model, likely as a result of remnant thermal energy (that is still dissipating) from when that physical region of the atmosphere was irradiated.

On the other hand, when the difference between the rotational and orbital periods is large, other than in the fully radiatively controlled regions of the very outer atmosphere, significant changes to the wind and temperature structure become evident, changes that can be seen in Fig. 17. At low pressure (e.g. 0.0026 bar) we find that the ‘mean’ (where the mean is taken in the frame of reference of the irradiation) hot-spot lies slightly to the west, approximately 15°, of the sub-stellar point. Such a westwards shift, if paired with opacity sources such as clouds which lead to phase curves probing low-pressure regions of the atmospheres, may explain the significant westwards phase curves observed for CoRoT-2b (Dang et al. 2018). We note that a westward shift in the planetary-scale wave pattern at similarly low pressures was proposed by Lewis & Hammond (2022) as an explanation for westward hot-spot offsets. Moving deeper, at 0.016 bar, we find strong thermal ‘wings’ that extend from mid-latitudes on the ‘mean’ day-side to near the equator on the ‘mean’ night-side, ‘wings’ that trace the relatively weak off-equator standing wave circulation develops here. These ‘wings’ only increase in strength as we move deeper into the atmosphere (0.2 bar; see Fig. 17), where we find that the non-synchronous mean day-side temperature map has becoming increasingly smeared eastwards of the (moving) sub-stellar point. Whilst this description make the temperature map sound a little like the classical thermal butterfly, differences in advective transport mean that this is not the case.

The formation of the classical thermal butterfly is driven by the eastwards advection of heat at the equator and the westwards advection of heat at higher latitudes. However, as seen in Sect. 4.1 and Fig. 17, the horizontal winds are much weaker in a highly non-synchronous atmosphere than its synchronous equivalent. For example, the eddy wind in our $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4\Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4\Omega_0$ model is a third of that found in the synchronous $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = \Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4\Omega_0$ model ($|u_e| = 63\,\text{m s}^{-1}$ vs. $|u_e| = 179\,\text{m s}^{-1}$), whilst the zonal component is less than a quarter of its synchronous counterpart ($|u_z| = 146\,\text{m s}^{-1}$ vs. $|u_z| = 645\,\text{m s}^{-1}$). Instead, analysis of snapshots of the wind and temperature profiles reveal that the ‘mean’ dynamics found in Fig. 17 are the result of the sub-stellar

point sweeping across the planets ‘surface’ at a rate that depends upon the difference between the rotational and orbital angular rotation rates. This leads to the smeared and shifted thermal structure seen in Fig. 17, which occurs due to residual night-side heat from when that region of the atmosphere was irradiated (i.e. the same effect that lead to slight night-side heating in the weakly non-synchronous regime) and the interaction between zonal winds and the shifting insolation. Essentially, we find that increasing the difference between the orbital and rotational periods decreases the day-night temperature difference by acting as a form of ‘advection’ from the day-side to the night-side. This is similar to the decrease in phase curve amplitude found in the rapidly rotating non-synchronous models of Showman et al. (2009).

The dynamics are slightly different when the rotational period is less than the orbital period. This occurs for two reasons, the first is that the direction of the hot-spot shift is reversed westwards rather than eastwards and the second in the decreasing influence of rotation at low $\Omega_{\text{rot}}$ resulting in divergent rather than rotational dynamics. Furthermore, the aforementioned smearing of the temperature map by the shifting sub-stellar point, as well as the above factors, means that we also no longer find any evidence for the formation of the night-side hot-spot that was a defining feature of our slow-rotation-regime models (Sect. 3.3).

Overall we find that, regardless of its sign, when the difference between the rotational and orbital angular rotation rates is large the underlying dynamics that lead to the features found in the synchronous regime are unable to develop.

### 4.4. Vertical enthalpy transport

We finish our analysis with a brief investigation into how the above changes to the flows and circulations due to a difference between the rotational and orbital periods impacts the global mean vertical enthalpy flux, as shown in Fig. 18. When the difference between the rotational and orbital periods is small, we find global mean vertical enthalpy fluxes that are at most 25% weaker than that found in an equivalent synchronous model. However as the difference between the rotational and orbital periods grows, and we enter the highly non-synchronous regime in which the horizontal dynamics have significantly slowed relative to a
<figure><img src="image_23.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 18.** Global mean vertical enthalpy flux for 13 non-synchronous HD209458b-like models spanning the rotation range $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.5\Omega_{\text{orb}} \rightarrow 4\Omega_{\text{orb}}$, where $\Omega_{\text{orb}} = \Omega_0$ is held constant. Here negative fluxes indicate net downward enthalpy transport. We note that there is a slight scatter in the mean vertical enthalpy flux around $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = \Omega_{\text{orb}} = \Omega_0$ can be linked with the averaging window and the current state on long timescale oscillations in the atmosphere. The main takeaway from this figure should be that the vertical enthalpy flux rapidly drops off when the different between the orbital and rotational periods increases.</figcaption></figure>

synchronous equivalent, we find that the vertical enthalpy transport has become increasingly suppressed, eventually dropping by over two orders of magnitude when $\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 4\Omega_{\text{orb}} = 4\Omega_0$.

This suggests that only weakly non-synchronous atmospheres should exhibit any significant deep heating and hence radius inflation. And indeed an analysis of the deep Temperature-Pressure profiles reveals this to be the case, with our weakly non-synchronous models showing signs of warming from their initial adiabat whilst the deep atmospheres of our highly non-synchronous models are highly sensitive to even the weakest of deep radiative forcing, suggesting that the link between the deep and outer atmosphere is nebulous at best in these models. We note that, as reflected in the weaker vertical enthalpy fluxes, we find that the deep adiabats of our weakly non-synchronous atmospheres is slightly cooler than a synchronous equivalent.

## 5. Discussion and conclusion

In this work, we have investigated how the planetary rotation rate affects the atmospheric dynamics, including the vertical energy transport, of an HD209458b-like hot Jupiter (with $\Omega_0 = 2.1 \times 10^5 \text{ s}^{-1}$ based upon the model of Sainsbury-Martinez et al. 2019) for both synchronous ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.125\Omega_0 \rightarrow 40\Omega_0$ - 28 models) and non-synchronous ($\Omega_{\text{rot}} = 0.5\Omega_0 \rightarrow 4\Omega_0$ - 13 models) rotation.

This work builds upon previous studies of the influence of orbital radii on atmospheric dynamics, such as Showman et al. (2009, 2015), by isolating the effects of rotation from the change in insolation that occurs when modifying the orbital radii. Our analysis revealed that, for the rotation rate ranges considered, our models fall into one of a number of distinct regimes.

For synchronous rotation we find three distinct dynamical regimes: slow rotation when $\Omega_{\text{rot}} < 0.5\Omega_0$, the classical hot Jupiter regime when ~ $0.5\Omega_0 < \Omega_{\text{rot}} < \sim 5\Omega_0$ (an analysis of which can be found in the main text), and the rapidly rotating regime when $\Omega_{\text{rot}} \gg 5\Omega_0$. We note that, as discussed in Sect. 3.6, these regimes are broadly in line with the rotation regimes for terrestrial exoplanet atmosphere dynamics discussed by Haqq-Misra et al. (2018), albeit with differences in dynamics

due to differences between the insolation of hot Jupiters and habitable zonal terrestrial exoplanets. They are also different from the rotation regimes discussed by Showman et al. (2015) in that we do not consider the weakly irradiated regime that they find at larger orbital radii and our rapidly rotating regime maintains a strong zonal jet due to the combination of significant, synchronous, day-side irradiation (i.e. a high day-night temperature contrast) and the suppression of off-equator dynamics by the coriolis effect in our models (we consider much shorter orbital periods than Showman et al. 2015).

We find that the slowly rotating regime is characterised by a slower zonal-mean zonal-jet (Fig. 1a) which does not extend deep into the atmosphere ($P > 0.5$ bar is quiescent). The underlying cause of this slow wind can be understood via the Helmholtz wind decomposition, which reveals that the strongest component of the horizontal wind, in the outer atmosphere, is the divergent component associated with a global overturning circulation as heat rises on the day-side, diverges from the sub-stellar point, before converging on the night-side, just to the west of the sub-stellar point. We also find that the exact location at which the winds converge is dependent upon the rotation rate, with the convergence point shifting westwards towards the eastern terminator as the influence of rotation grows. This divergent wind, and the associated global overturning circulation acts as the main driver of vertical enthalpy transport and deep adiabatic heating, leading to the formation of a rather unexpected feature: a night-side hot-spot (Figs. 6g, 7a, and 11b). This night-side hot-spot appears to be a robust feature of the slowly rotating regime and plays a role in shaping the mid-atmosphere dynamics. For example, around 0.2bar, we find that the night-side hot spot is hotter than any point on the day-side, an effect that reshapes the winds, driving a strong night-day flow.

As a result we find that the aforementioned global overturning circulation, associated with the divergent day-side wind and a broad sub-stellar point upflow, is closed in the mid-atmosphere, helping to explain the quiescent deep atmosphere. This effect can be seen in the meridional circulation profile, where we find an equatorial downflow that is confined to low pressures, and horizontal mixing at the bottom of the jet, where the night-side hot-spot forms. Finally this lack of a strong equatorial downflow that connects the outer atmosphere with the deep, $P > 10$ bar, atmosphere means that the net deep heating is also weak (Figs. 12a and 12d), leading to a deep atmosphere that is not significantly heated (Fig. 7a), thus suggesting that slowly rotating warm and hot Jupiters should exhibit little to no radius inflation.

It is important to note that this wind structure and the associated night-side hot spot may also have implications beyond suppressing radius inflation. For example, linked with the night-side hot-spot is a thermal inversion and cold-trap (Fig. 7a), an effect that may have important implications for observations of these planets and in particular their atmospheric chemistry. These observations are starting to become possible thanks to next-generation telescopes, such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), that allow for the characterisation hot and warm gaseous exoplanets on longer orbits around hotter stars.

As for where such a planet might be observed, including a the possible presence of a night-side hot-spot, the most likely scenario is in a longer orbit around a K/M dwarf. Here the synchronisation time-scale is no longer an issue due to the expected lifetimes of cool stars (greater than the current age of the universe), although the reduced insolation may effect the strength of the night-side heating.

On the other hand, we find that the rapidly rotating regime is characterised by a narrow, but deep, equatorial jet braced by
easterly counterflows (Fig. 1c). This is a result of the increas-
ing influence that the Coriolis effect plays on the atmospheric
dynamics, suppressing high-latitude off-equator flows. Specifi-
cally we find that, as the rotation rate rises, the standing $m = 1$
Rossby and Kelvin waves which drive the archetypal super-
rotating jet become increasingly tilted and confined to low
latitudes, leading not only to the narrower jet seen here as the
circulation cells become latitudinally compressed, but also a
weakening of the overall equatorial winds as the angular momen-
tum pumping (from mid-latitudes to the equator) mechanism
becomes less efficient. This compression grows as we increase
the rotation rate, leading to noticeably slow jets at very high $\Omega_{\text{rot}}$
(Fig. 17a). This latitudinal compression of the zonal-winds and
off-equator flows also impacts the advection of enthalpy away
from the sub-stellar point. For example, we find that the thermal
butterfly (Fig. 6c/h/l) has become somewhat confined to equato-
rial regions, with eastwards advection at the equator, westwards
and polewards advection at low latitudes, and almost no advec-
tion at higher latitudes where the Coriolis forces are strongest
(and winds are weakest). We note that this slight westwards
advection at low latitudes might explain the weak westwards
phase-curve offsets found in observations by, for example, May
et al. (2022).

Vertically, the latitudinal compression and resulting banding
of the zonal-mean zonal-wind leads to a meridional circulation
profile (Fig. 5c) that contains multiple circulation cells in each
hemisphere, although these circulations cells do still combine at
the equator to drive a weakened downflow at all pressures, con-
necting the outer and deep atmospheres. We note that, much like
the zonal wind, the meridional circulation is significantly weak-
ened at high latitudes thanks to the Coriolis effect, hence most
vertical mixing is also confined to low-latitudes (i.e. the equa-
torial region). This has important implications for the vertical
enthalpy transport and hence heating of the deep atmosphere,
both of which we find to be globally weak (Figs. 10g, 12f, and
7c). However, we note that this is just the global value. If we
instead consider the equatorial mean (where vertical mixing is
strongest), we find a net downward enthalpy flux comparable to
that found in the classical hot Jupiter regime, and which leads to
slight warming of the equatorial regions deep T-P profile (and
only the equatorial regions due to the quiescence of the off-
equator deep atmospheric winds). As such, one might expect
such objects to be slightly puffed up near the equator, although
such an effect is likely to remain minor and may be entan-
gled with other effects that rotation and irradiation has on the
atmospheres shape.

This may help to explain the radius inflation, or lack-thereof,
observed for ultra-hot Jupiters. Planets with an orbital period of
less than around 20 hours tend to exhibit little to no radius infla-
tion (e.g. Wasp-18b, Arcangeli et al. 2019, and Wasp-43b, Hellier
et al. 2011), whereas planets with orbital periods of >22 hours
start to show signs of inflation (e.g. Wasp-103b, Gillon et al.
2014, and KELT-16b Oberst et al. 2017), similar to the transition
seen with rotation rate here. This is also in agreement with the
results of Sainsbury-Martinez et al. (2021), who found similar
dynamics and a similar lack of radius inflation for SDSS1411b.
We note that these examples suggest a rather sharp transition,
however when we consider the larger sample of known Jupiter-
sized exoplanets, the transition is less distinct. As shown in
Fig. 19, which plots the relationship between planetary Radius,
Effective Temperature, and Orbital Periods, as expected there
appears to be a general relationship between increased effective
temperature (i.e. insolation) and planetary radius (Laughlin et al.
2011; Demory & Seager 2011). However, there is also a trend

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 19.** Plot showing the relationship between the radius and effective temperature (i.e. insolation) of Jupiter-mass planets, and how the rotation rate (represented by the colour of each point) modulates inflation. This plot was made using data from exoplanet.eu.</figcaption></figure>

of decreasing radius with decreased orbital periods, albeit with
some exceptions, suggesting that rotation is may play a role in
modulating radius inflation.

The confinement of dynamics to low latitudes also comes
with a corresponding decrease in typical dynamical length-
scales, such as the Rossby deformation radius or the Rhine
length. In our most rapidly rotating models, these length-scales
can approach the resolution of our grid, suggesting that our mod-
els might be struggling to fully capture some of the dynamics.
As such, we suggest that a future study investigate the most
rapidly rotating hot Jupiter regime with a significantly increased
horizontal resolution in order to fully resolve the dynamics at
play.

Thanks to JWST, as well as other next-generation ground and
space based telescopes, there is likely to be in influx of long
orbital period warm and hot Jupiters in the near future. Not only
would these objects likely fall into the slowly rotating regime, it
is also increasingly likely that at least some will not be perfectly
synchronously rotating. This can occur because the synchroni-
sation timescale increases with orbital radii, approaching the
system age for a warm Jupiter orbiting a sun-like star at 0.2au.
There are also a number of scenarios that might lead to a non-
synchronous but highly irradiated hot Jupiter being observed.
For example, it is unlikely that hot Jupiters formed so close to
their host star and hence must have undergone planetary migra-
tion (Lin et al. 1996; Heller 2019). Thus, if one where to observe
a hot Jupiter that had recently, or is still undergoing, migration,
then it might not yet have had time to synchronise. Another pos-
sibility are hot or warm Jupiters that are in stable 3:2 orbital
resonances instead of full 1:1 spin synchronisation. This would
lead to dynamics that are similar to our slightly non-synchronous
models, with the solar insolation ‘slowly’ sweeping across the
planetary atmosphere.

As a result, and since many of the dynamics observed in hot
Jupiter atmospheres are directly or indirectly linked to the strong
day-night thermal forcing (from the day-night divergent flows in
the slowly rotating regime to the thermally driven, $m = 1$ Kelvin
and Rossby standing waves that are responsible for the equatorial
jet when rotational effects dominate), we next investigated how
varying levels of non-synchronicity, as characterised by a dif-
ference between the varying planetary rotation rate and a fixed
orbital period affects atmospheric dynamics. Here we found two
additional regimes, depending upon the difference between the
planetary rotational and orbital periods: when the difference is
small, on the order of a few percent (< 15%) of the smaller
period, we find dynamics that are qualitatively similar to the syn-
chronous regime, just a little weaker. On the other hand when the
difference is large, we find significant differences in the dynam-
ics, especially in the driving of the super-rotating jet. This is in
agreement with the results of Showman et al. (2009).

Briefly, when the difference between the rotational and
orbital periods is small, we find dynamics, including vertical
enthalpy transport, that are structurally similar to those found in
the synchronous regime, but just a little bit weaker. The biggest
difference comes about when we look at the horizontal tem-
perature map in the outer atmosphere, where we find that the
'sweeping' of the stellar irradiation essentially acts as a form
of day-night transport, with residual heat leading to a warmer
night-side and hence a reduced day-night temperature difference.

The above holds true when we also vary Ω<sub>orb</sub>. As such, we expect a small difference between the rotational and orbital periods to have little effect on observable features, such as the phase curve (hot-spot location) or radius. Furthermore, since the synchronisation timescale rapidly decreases with decreasing orbital radii it is highly likely that the majority of warm or hot Jupiters detected in the near future will be either synchronously rotating or only weakly non-synchronous. Whilst this is good in one sense, i.e. we can understand the dynamics of such objects quite easily, it also means that, with current tools, there is a distinct possibility that some weakly non-synchronous objects (which are potentially young, depending upon the local synchronisation time-scale), might be erroneously labelled as tidally-locked.

But what about a scenario in which a planet has recently
migrated onto a shorter orbit and not yet synchronised its rotation
with its host star, leading to a large difference between the rota-
tional and orbital angular rotation rates? Here our models suggest
that the dynamics should be distinct from those found in the syn-
chronous regime. For example, we find a zonal-mean zonal-jet
(Fig. 14b) that is both slower and shallower than its synchronous
counterpart. This has a knock-on effect on the vertical dynamics,
weakening both the meridional circulation and vertical enthalpy
flux, the latter of which rapidly decreases as the difference
between the rotational and orbital periods grows (Fig. 18). The
underlying cause of these changes can be best understood by
exploring the horizontal wind and temperature maps in the outer
atmosphere (Fig. 17). One immediate observation is that the
thermal butterfly that typically forms in the mid-atmosphere of
non-slowly rotating hot Jupiters is not present. Instead, we find
that the temperature map has become longitudinally smeared,
with the strength of the smearing depending upon ΔΩ: i.e. as the
difference between the rotational and orbital periods increases,
the time since the night-side was last irradiated gets smaller,
leading to increased residual heating and a hot-spot that appears
to trail the irradiation. Not only does this have the effect of
reducing the strength of the day-night forcing, it also prevents
the formation of the standing-wave structures that drive many
of the dynamics of hot Jupiters, including the super-rotating jet
and hence meridional circulation and vertical enthalpy flux. This
can also shift the transition between the rotational-dominated
and divergence-dominated dynamical regimes to faster plane-
tary rotation rates, which will lead to additional changes in the
strength of the vertical advection, since divergence-dominated
winds are less efficient at vertical transport. We note that the
'smearing' of the temperature profile found in the highly non-
synchronous regime is similar to non-synchronous models of
Showman et al. (2015); see their Figure 4.

Overall, this suggests that warm and hot Jupiters with large
differences between their rotational and orbital periods should
be observationally distinct from a synchronously rotating planet

at the same orbital radius. This includes both a reduced phase
curve amplitude as well as a reduced hot-spot offset, the latter
of which could be either to the east or the west of the sub-
stellar point depending upon the sign of the difference between
the rotational and orbital periods as well as the pressure-level
probed. Evidence for a significant (15°) west-ward hot-spot off-
set was found at low-pressures (e.g. *P* = 0.0026 bar) in our
highly non-synchronous model (with Ω<sub>rot</sub> = 4Ω<sub>orb</sub> = 4Ω<sub>0</sub>). Such
a shift, if paired with atmospheric opacity features, for exam-
ple clouds, that lead to phase curves observations probing lower
pressure regions of the atmosphere, may explain the westwards
phase curve offset and broad phase-curve minimum of CoRoT-2b
(Dang et al. 2018).

We might also expect to see a reduced level of radius inflation
for such objects thanks to the reduced vertical heat flux, although
this conclusion is more tenuous since newly formed Jupiter-like
objects which have recently undergone planetary migration are
likely still dissipating excess energy, associated with for exam-
ple gravitational collapse, from the formation process, meaning
that their envelopes are likely puffed up (Szulágyi et al. 2016).
Such a scenario could be confirmed by comparing observed radii
with planetary formation models, such as those of Fortney et al.
(2007). We note however that migration history can play a role
in the observed radius of hot Jupiters when energy is deposited
deep in the interior (Mol Louis & Miguel 2020).

In this work we have discussed how rotation alone can sig-
nificantly impact and alter the dynamics of Hot Jupiters, ranging
from the outer atmosphere wind and temperature structure, to the
vertical transport of enthalpy. The latter effect may be of partic-
ular importance when trying to explain variations in hot Jupiter
radii found at fixed irradiation, in particular the lack of inflation
observed for some very-short-orbit hot Jupiters and hot brown
dwarfs.

One interesting discovery that might have significant impli-
cations for atmospheric dynamics and chemistry is the forma-
tion of a night-side hot-spot (via divergent day-night winds)
in the mid-atmosphere of our slowly and synchronously rotat-
ing regime models. If such a night-side hot-spot is a robust
feature of more slowly rotating warm Jupiters, something that
we wish to investigate using a next-generation GCM (such as
expeRT/MITgcm) that robustly models radiative heating and
cooling at all pressure levels, the associated temperature inver-
sion may significantly alter atmospheric chemistry by acting,
for example, as a cold trap and hence reshaping the vertical
distribution of key observable models. Understanding such an
effect would likely require modelling the atmospheres of slowly
rotating warm Jupiters with a GCM that includes both robust
radiative transport and dis-equilibrium chemistry, something
that is currently far too computationally expensive to robustly
investigate. Although work is ongoing to solve this issue. For
example, Lee et al. (2023), have coupled a reduced chemical
network ('mini-chem') to the GCM Exo-FMS, in order to study
the effects of non-equilibrium chemistry on the atmospheres of
WASP-39b and HD189733b in a computationally efficient man-
ner. As might be expected, this model showed that transport can
have a significant affect on the chemistry and local atmospheric
composition. However this comes at the cost of calculating a
significantly reduced chemical network (12 species without pho-
tochemistry) and the need for ~73 weeks of wall-clock time
using 200 processors to model the 200 Earth years of simulation
time considered here.

*Acknowledgements.* F. Sainsbury-Martinez and P. Tremblin would like to
acknowledge and thank the ERC for funding this work under the Horizon
2020 program project ATMO (ID: 757858). F. Sainsbury-Martinez would also like to thank UK Research and Innovation for additional support under grant number MR/T040726/1. The authors also wish to thank Idris, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, and Mdls for access to the supercomputers Poincare, and Ruche, without which the long time-scale calculations featured in this work would not have been possible. Additionally this work was granted access to the HPC resources of IDRIS (Jean-Zay) and CEA-TGCC (Irene/Joliot-Curie) under the 2021/2022 allocation – A0100410870 made as part of the GENCI Dari A10 call.

## References

Arcangeli, J., Désert, J.-M., Parmentier, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A136

Chang, E. K. M., Lee, S., & Swanson, K. L. 2002, J. Climate, 15, 2163

Dang, L., Cowan, N. B., Schwartz, J. C., et al. 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 220

Demory, B.-O., & Seager, S. 2011, ApJS, 197, 12

Dong, J., Huang, C. X., Zhou, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, L16

Dubos, T., & Voitus, F. 2014, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4621

Dubos, T., Dubey, S., Tort, M., et al. 2015, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3131

Dutton, J. 1986, The Ceaseless Wind: An Introduction to the Theory of Atmospheric Motion, Dover Books on Earth Sciences (Dover Publications)

Flasar, F. M., Baines, K. H., Bird, M. K., Tokano, T., & West, R. A. 2010, Atmospheric Dynamics and Meteorology, eds. R. H. Brown, J.-P. Lebreton, & J. H. Waite (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 323

Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661

Gillon, M., Anderson, D. R., Collier-Cameron, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, L3

Hadley, G. 1735, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. I, 39, 58

Hammond, M., & Lewis, N. T. 2021, PNAS, 118, e2022705118

Haqq-Misra, J., Wolf, E. T., Joshi, M., Zhang, X., & Kopparapu, R. K. 2018, ApJ, 852, 67

Heller, R. 2019, A&A, 628, A42

Hellier, C., Anderson, D. R., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, L7

Hjorth, M., Justesen, A. B., Hirano, T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 3522

Hoskins, B. J., & Valdes, P. J. 1990, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1854

Huang, C. X., Quinn, S. N., Vanderbilt, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, L7

Ingersoll, A., & Vasavada, A. 1998, Highlights Astron., 11, 1042

Iro, N., Bézard, B., & Guillot, T. 2005, A&A, 436, 719

Laughlin, G., Crismani, M., & Adams, F. C. 2011, ApJ, 729, L7

Laurila, T. K., Gregow, H., Cornér, J., & Sinclair, V. A. 2021, Weather Climate Dyn., 2, 1111

Lee, E. K. H., Casewell, S. L., Chubb, K. L., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4674

Lee, E. K. H., Tsai, S.-M., Hammond, M., & Tan, X. 2023, A&A, 672, A110

Lewis, N. T., & Hammond, M. 2022, ApJ, 941, 171

Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606

May, E. M., Stevenson, K. B., Bean, J. L., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 256

Mayne, N. J., Baraffe, I., Acreman, D. M., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A1

Mendonça, J. M. 2019, MNRAS, 491, 1456

Mitchell, J. L., & Vallis, G. K. 2010, J. Geophys. Res. (Planets), 115, E12008

Mol Louis, M., & Miguel, Y. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2994

Oberst, T. E., Rodriguez, J. E., Colon, K. D., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 97

Perez-Becker, D., & Showman, A. P. 2013, ApJ, 776, 134

Rauscher, E., & Menou, K. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1334

Sainsbury-Martinez, F., Wang, P., Fromang, S., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A114

Sainsbury-Martinez, F., Casewell, S. L., Lothringer, J. D., Phillips, M. W., & Tremblin, P. 2021, A&A, 656, A128

Sainsbury-Martinez, F., Tremblin, P., Mancip, M., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 958, 68

Sainsbury-Martinez, F., Tremblin, P., Schneider, A. D., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 524, 1316

Schlecker, M., Kossakowski, D., Brahm, R., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 275

Schneider, T. 2006, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 34, 655

Sergeev, D. E., Lewis, N. T., Lambert, F. H., et al. 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 214

Showman, A. P., & Polvani, L. M. 2011, ApJ, 738, 71

Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lian, Y., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 564

Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lewis, N. K., & Shabram, M. 2013a, ApJ, 762, 24

Showman, A. P., Wordsworth, R. D., Merlis, T. M., & Kaspi, Y. 2013b, in Comparative Climatology of Terrestrial Planets, eds. S. J. Mackwell, A. A. Simon-Miller, J. W. Harder, & M. A. Bullock, 277

Showman, A. P., Lewis, N. K., & Fortney, J. J. 2015, ApJ, 801, 95

Shporer, A., Zhou, G., Fulton, B. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 188

Stangret, M., Casasayas-Barris, N., Pallé, E., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A101

Szulágyi, J., Masset, F., Lega, E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2853

Tremblin, P., Chabrier, G., Mayne, N. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, 30

Ulmer-Moll, S., Lendl, M., Gill, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A46

Vallis, G. K. 2006, Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-Scale Circulation, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press), 946

Young, R. M., Read, P. L., & Wang, Y. 2019, Icarus, 326, 225