Circular economy strategies in industrial engineering:
From theory to practice

Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe, Okpala Charles Chikwendu

► To cite this version:

Charles Onyeka Nwamekwe, Okpala Charles Chikwendu. Circular economy strategies in industrial engineering: From theory to practice. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2025, 06 (01), pp.1773-1782. hal-04943409

HAL Id: hal-04943409

https://hal.science/hal-04943409v1

Submitted on 12 Feb 2025

**HAL** is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research and Growth Evaluation.

Circular economy strategies in industrial engineering: From theory to practice

Nwamekwe Charles Onyeka ¹, Okpala Charles Chikwendu ²*

1, 2 Industrial/Production Engineering Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B. 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

* Corresponding Author: Okpala Charles Chikwendu

Article Info

ISSN (online): 2582-7138

Volume: 06

Issue: 01

January-February 2025

Received: 13-01-2025

Accepted: 15-02-2025

Page No: 1773-1782

Abstract

The transition to a Circular Economy (CE) represents a paradigm shift in industrial engineering, as it prioritizes sustainability, resource efficiency, and waste minimization. This paper explores comprehensive strategies for implementing CE principles, emphasizing on waste-to-resource transformation, material recovery, bio-energy production, and sustainable supply chain management. Leveraging advanced tools such as Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), material flow optimization, and process simulation, industries can identify inefficiencies and adopt innovative practices that align with global sustainability goals. The research delves into key challenges, including technological limitations, economic constraints, and regulatory barriers, while highlighting the pivotal role of policy frameworks and public-private partnerships in fostering CE adoption. Furthermore, emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) are identified as enablers of CE strategies, driving innovations in resource management, reverse logistics, and real-time monitoring. Through case studies and sector-specific applications, the paper underscores the transformative potential of CE in reshaping traditional industrial processes into sustainable systems. It advocates for collaborative efforts, robust policymaking, and technological advancements to address existing challenges, paving the way for a resilient, eco-friendly industrial economy. This work serves as a guide for academics, practitioners, and policymakers aiming at effective integration of CE principles into industrial engineering practices.

**Keywords:** Circular economy, industrial engineering, sustainable manufacturing, waste-to-resource transformation, design for recycling, resource optimization

1. Introduction

The Circular Economy (CE) paradigm is increasingly recognized as a vital framework for sustainable industrial engineering, emphasizing resource efficiency through reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing. This approach contrasts sharply with the traditional linear model of production, which often leads to significant waste and environmental degradation (Bag and Pretorius, 2020; Angelis et al., 2018) [5, 2]. By integrating CE principles, industrial engineers can optimize manufacturing processes, thereby address critical global challenges such as resource depletion and unsustainable production patterns (Hysa et al., 2020; Moktadir et al., 2018) [19]. Research indicates that the adoption of CE strategies not only enhances operational efficiency, but also fosters innovation within supply chains, promoting a shift towards more sustainable practices (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16]. For instance, the incorporation of Industry 4.0 technologies in CE initiatives facilitates better resource management and waste reduction, ultimately contributing to improved sustainability performance in manufacturing (Obiuto, 2024). Thus, the transition from theory to practice in industrial engineering necessitates a comprehensive understanding of CE principles and their application in real-world contexts.

The transition from a linear economic model to a CE is imperative for addressing the significant waste generation, environmental pollution, and unsustainable resource utilization that have characterized industrial practices for decades (Bag and Pretorius, 2020) [5]. The inefficiencies inherent in the linear model pose substantial risks to both long-term economic growth and environmental sustainability (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31].
As industries increasingly prioritize resilience and sustainability, CE offers a framework for redesigning processes and systems to mitigate these challenges (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31].

However, the implementation of CE strategies in manufacturing is fraught with obstacles like technological limitations, economic barriers, and policy gaps (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31]. For instance, while Industry 4.0 technologies can enhance resource efficiency, their integration into existing systems often encounters resistance due to inadequate infrastructure and investment (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31]. Furthermore, the lack of supportive policies and incentives can hinder the adoption of sustainable practices, making it essential for stakeholders to collaborate in overcoming these barriers (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31]. Thus, a comprehensive approach that addresses these challenges is crucial for the successful transition to a circular economy in industrial engineering.

This review explores innovative CE strategies in industrial engineering, emphasizing practical applications and theoretical foundations. Key objectives entail the examination of CE principles relevant to industrial engineering, analysing strategies like design for recycling and waste-to-resource transformation, as well as the identification of challenges and future research opportunities.

# 2. Theoretical Foundations of Circular Economy

## 2.1 Principles of Circular Economy

The principles of the CE are foundational to promoting sustainable resource use within industrial engineering. CE emphasizes the importance of minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency through practices such as recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing (Schroeder et al., 2018) [51]. These principles align closely with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which demonstrate that CE practices can significantly contribute to achieving broader sustainability objectives (Schroeder et al., 2018) [51].

Moreover, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with CE principles enhances the potential for sustainable manufacturing by facilitating real-time data analysis and resource optimization (Rosa et al., 2019; Igbokwe et al., 2024a) [24, 46]. This synergy not only improves operational efficiency but also fosters innovation in product design and development, thus leading to more sustainable outcomes (Rosa et al., 2019) [46]. However, the successful implementation of CE strategies requires a comprehensive understanding of the interconnections between various industrial practices and sustainability indicators. Thus, embracing CE principles within industrial engineering is crucial for fostering a resilient and sustainable future. The CE framework is built on principles that prioritize sustainable resource which include the following:

Design for Recycling (DfR).

* **Reuse:** Reuse is a pivotal strategy within the CE framework, aimed at extending the lifecycle of products through re-purposing. This approach not only mitigates waste generation but also conserves resources by maximizing the utility of existing products (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Supanut, 2024) [15, 53]. By facilitating the reuse of materials and components, industries can significantly reduce their environmental footprint while promoting sustainability (Romero et al., 2021; Okpala and Udu, 2025) [45, 38].

* Implementing reuse strategies requires innovative design practices that prioritize the adaptability of products for multiple uses (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16]. For instance, in the electronics sector, companies are increasingly focusing on the direct reuse of functioning devices or their refurbishment, which enhances resource efficiency and reduces the demand for new materials (Jones and Wynn, 2021) [22]. Furthermore, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies can streamline the processes associated with reuse, enabling better tracking and management of materials throughout their lifecycle (Santos et al., 2023) [50]. Overall, the adoption of reuse practices within industrial engineering not only supports the transition to a circular economy, but also fosters resilience and sustainability in manufacturing systems (Esteva et al., 2020) [13]. By prioritizing reuse, industries can create a more sustainable future while simultaneously achieving economic benefits through reduced material costs and waste management expenses (Wiah et al., 2022; Okpala, 2014) [55].

* **Remanufacturing:** Remanufacturing is a crucial strategy within the CE framework that focuses on restoring used products to like-new conditions. This process does not only conserve resources, but also significantly reduces waste, aligning with sustainability goals (Nascimento et al., 2019; Sahoo, 2023) [33, 49]. By remanufacturing, companies can reclaim valuable materials and components, thereby extending the lifecycle of products and minimizing the environmental impact associated with traditional manufacturing practices (Sahoo, 2023; Kerin and Pham, 2019) [49, 24].

* The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies plays a pivotal role in enhancing remanufacturing processes. These technologies facilitate better tracking of materials, optimize production processes, and improve the overall efficiency of remanufacturing operations. Furthermore, remanufacturing contributes to economic benefits by lowering production costs and creating new business opportunities within the circular economy (Esteva et al., 2020) [13]. However, successful remanufacturing requires overcoming challenges such as consumer acceptance and the need for robust supply chain management (Kerin and Pham, 2019; Giudice et al., 2020) [24, 17]. As industries increasingly adopt remanufacturing practices, it is essential to develop supportive policies and frameworks that encourage this transition, ensuring that remanufactured products meet quality standards and consumer expectations (Giudice et al., 2020) [17]. Ultimately, remanufacturing represents a significant opportunity for industries to embrace sustainability while enhancing their competitive advantage in the market.

* **Waste Minimization:** Waste minimization is a fundamental strategy in the CE aimed at reducing waste generation at every stage of production. This approach enhances resource efficiency and contributes to environmental sustainability, by decreasing the volume of waste that requires disposal (Ren et al., 2019) [44]. Implementing waste minimization techniques involves adopting practices such as lean manufacturing, which focuses on eliminating non-value-added activities and optimizing processes to reduce waste (Ren et al., 2019; Ihueze and Okpala, 2011) [44]. Research indicates that integrating big data analytics throughout the product
lifecycle can significantly support waste minimization efforts by providing insights into production processes and identifying areas for improvement (Ren et al., 2019) [44]. Additionally, industries can benefit from innovative waste management practices, such as converting waste into valuable by-products, which aligns with the principles of a circular economy.

* Overall, effective waste minimization not only reduces environmental impact, but also enhances economic performance by lowering costs associated with waste disposal and raw material procurement. As industries increasingly recognize the importance of sustainability, adopting comprehensive waste minimization strategies becomes essential for achieving circular economy objectives (Bernal-Carrillo, 2024; Ezeanyim et al., 2015) [7, 14].

## 2.2 Circular Economy and Industrial Engineering

Industrial engineering plays a pivotal role in operationalizing CE principles by providing essential tools and methodologies. Techniques such as process optimization, lean manufacturing, and systems analysis are instrumental in achieving CE objectives, enabling manufacturers to enhance resource efficiency and reduce costs (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Okpala et al., 2020) [15, 40]. By integrating CE into industrial engineering practices, organizations can streamline operations, minimize waste, and foster sustainable production methods (Sahoo, 2023; Nwamekwe et al., 2024) [49, 36].

The deployment of Industry 4.0 technologies further amplifies these benefits by facilitating real-time data analysis and improving supply chain management, which are crucial for effective resource utilization (Esteva et al., 2020) [13]. For instance, the application of big data analytics allows for better decision-making regarding material flows and waste reduction strategies (Moraga et al., 2019) [32]. As industries increasingly adopt these methodologies, they not only contribute to sustainability goals, but also gain a competitive edge in the market by aligning with the growing demand for environmentally responsible practices.

## 2.3 Frameworks and Policies

Global frameworks are essential for implementing CE strategies, as they provide a structured approach for industries to transition towards sustainable practices. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation has been pivotal in popularizing CE concepts through extensive research and collaborative efforts, which have significantly influenced policy development and industry practices. Furthermore, the European Union's Circular Economy Action Plan outlines comprehensive policies aimed at reducing waste and promoting sustainable production methods, thereby setting a clear direction for member states and industries (Sahoo, 2023) [49].

These frameworks not only guide industries in adopting CE principles but also highlight the critical role of industrial engineering in aligning operational practices with policy objectives. By leveraging methodologies such as process optimization and systems analysis, industrial engineers can facilitate the integration of CE strategies into manufacturing processes, thereby enhance resource efficiency and reducing environmental impact (Moraga et al., 2019; Esteva et al., 2020) [32, 13]. Ultimately, the collaboration between global frameworks and industrial engineering practices is crucial for

fostering a successful transition to a circular economy, which ensures that sustainability goals are met while maintaining economic viability (Centobelli et al., 2020) [9].

# 3. Innovative Strategies for Circular Economy in Manufacturing

## 3.1 Design for Recycling

Designing products for recyclability is a critical component of the CE, focusing on selecting materials and assembly methods that facilitate end-of-life recovery. Effective strategies for DfR include using mono-materials, which simplify the recycling process, and ensuring that components can be easily disassembled (Vollmer et al., 2020; Siregar, 2023) [54, 52]. This approach not only enhances the recyclability of products, but also reduces the overall environmental impact by minimizing waste and conserving resources (Sabău-Popa et al., 2022) [48].

Recent studies emphasize the importance of integrating DfR principles into the product development lifecycle. For instance, Joustra et al. (2021) [23] highlight the need for frameworks that guide the design of composite materials, which often pose challenges in recycling due to their complex structures. Additionally, the European Union's CE Action Plan underscores the necessity of incorporating recyclability into product design to meet sustainability targets and improve material efficiency. By prioritizing recyclability in product design, manufacturers can contribute to a more sustainable industrial ecosystem, aligning with CE objectives and enhancing their competitive advantage in a resource-constrained environment. Ultimately, DfR serves as a vital strategy for fostering a circular economy, promoting the recovery of valuable materials and reducing reliance on virgin resources. These strategies include the following:

* **Material Selection:** Material selection is a fundamental aspect of implementing CE principles in industrial engineering, as it emphasizes the prioritization of recyclable and non-toxic materials. By choosing materials that are easily recyclable and safe for the environment, manufacturers can significantly reduce waste and enhance the sustainability of their products (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Supanut, 2024) [15, 53]. This practice aids in minimizing the ecological footprint of production processes and aligns with regulatory frameworks aimed at promoting sustainable practices (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16].

Incorporating recyclable materials into product design facilitates end-of-life recovery, thereby closing the material loop and contributing to resource efficiency (Jones and Wynn, 2021) [22]. For instance, the use of biodegradable plastics and recycled metals can reduce reliance on virgin resources while addressing environmental concerns associated with waste disposal (Santos et al., 2023) [50]. Furthermore, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies can optimize material selection processes, enabling better tracking of material flows and enhancing the overall efficiency of production systems. Ultimately, prioritizing recyclable and non-toxic materials in industrial engineering supports the transition to a circular economy and fosters innovation and competitiveness within the marketplace (Esteva et al., 2020; Wiah et al., 2022) [13, 55]. By embedding these principles into material selection, industries can contribute to a more sustainable future while meeting the growing consumer demand for environmentally
responsible products.

* **Modular Design:** Modular design is a key strategy in the CE that facilitates easy disassembly and component reuse, thereby enhancing sustainability in industrial engineering. By designing products in modular formats, manufacturers can simplify the process of repairing, upgrading, and recycling components, which significantly extends the product lifecycle (Siregar, 2023) [52]. This approach not only reduces waste, but also conserves resources by enabling the recovery of valuable materials from end-of-life products (Joustra et al., 2021) [23].

Research indicates that modular design can lead to substantial economic benefits, as it allows companies to reduce costs associated with raw material procurement and waste management (Sabäu-Popa et al., 2022) [48]. For instance, Joustra et al. (2021) [23], emphasize the importance of modularity in composite products, highlighting that such designs can improve recyclability and facilitate alternative recovery pathways. Moreover, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies can further enhance modular design by enabling real-time tracking and management of components, thus optimizing the reuse process (Nascimento et al., 2019) [33].

* **Case Study:** A leading electronics manufacturer successfully redesigned its products using modular components, resulting in a 30% increase in recyclability and a reduction in production costs. This case study exemplifies the practical application of modular design principles within the framework of the CE (Roy, 2023). By implementing modularity, the manufacturer enabled easy disassembly of products, facilitating the recovery and reuse of components at the end of their lifecycle. The adoption of modular design not only enhances recyclability but also allows for greater flexibility in production processes. This flexibility can lead to economies of scale and improved efficiency, as different modules can be produced and assembled independently. Furthermore, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies, such as advanced manufacturing and data analytics, supports the optimization of modular systems, ensuring that the components meet specific performance and sustainability criteria.

Overall, this case study highlights the significant benefits of modular design in promoting sustainability and cost-effectiveness in manufacturing, aligning with the broader goals of the circular economy (Abdulnour et al., 2022) [1]. By prioritizing modularity, companies can enhance their competitive advantage while contributing to environmental conservation and resource efficiency.

## 3.2 Remanufacturing Processes

Remanufacturing processes are integral to the CE as they restore used products to their original functionality and quality. This practice not only extends the lifecycle of products, but also significantly reduces waste and resource consumption, aligning with sustainability goals (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Supanut, 2024) [15, 53]. By disassembling, cleaning, repairing, and replacing worn-out components, manufacturers can effectively rejuvenate products, thereby conserving materials and minimizing the environmental impact associated with new production (Romero et al., 2021) [45].

Literature indicates that remanufacturing can lead to

substantial economic benefits, including reduced production costs and enhanced competitiveness in the market (Meng, 2023). For instance, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies, such as automation and data analytics, can optimize remanufacturing processes, improving efficiency and quality control (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16]. Furthermore, the adoption of remanufacturing practices supports the development of sustainable business models that prioritize resource efficiency and waste reduction (Jones and Wynn, 2021) [22]. The key techniques include:

* **Inspection and Sorting:** Inspection and sorting are critical processes in assessing components for remanufacture within the framework of the CE. These processes ensure that only viable parts are selected for remanufacturing, thereby maximizing resource efficiency and minimizing waste (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Supanut, 2024) [15, 53]. By implementing systematic inspection protocols, manufacturers can evaluate the condition and functionality of used components, determining their suitability for refurbishment or reuse (Romero et al., 2021) [45].

Effective inspection and sorting techniques can significantly enhance the remanufacturing process. For instance, the integration of advanced technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence can improve the accuracy and efficiency of component assessment, enabling real-time decision-making (Meng, 2023; Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16]. This technological advancement not only streamlines operations, but also supports the development of sustainable business models that prioritize resource recovery and waste reduction (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16].

Moreover, the emphasis on inspection and sorting aligns with broader CE objectives by fostering a culture of sustainability within manufacturing practices. By prioritizing the recovery of high-quality components, industries can contribute to a circular economy that minimizes reliance on virgin materials and reduces environmental impact (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Jones and Wynn, 2021) [15, 22]. Thus, robust inspection and sorting processes are essential for optimizing remanufacturing efforts and achieving sustainability goals in industrial engineering.

* **Refurbishing:** Refurbishing, defined as the process of replacing or repairing worn-out parts, is a critical strategy within the circular economy framework, particularly in industrial engineering. This approach not only extends the life cycle of products, but also significantly reduces waste and resource consumption. For instance, remanufacturing, which involves restoring products to 'like-new' condition, has been recognized as a vital component of sustainable practices, allowing for the reuse of materials and minimizing environmental impact (Reike et al., 2018) [43].

Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies further enhance refurbishing capabilities by enabling on-demand production of spare parts, thus reducing the need for extensive inventories and facilitating repairs during operations (Bueno, 2024) [8]. The integration of advanced techniques such as laser cladding and directed energy deposition has shown promise in effectively repairing worn components, thereby improving their mechanical properties and extending their service life (Guan et al., 2022) [18]. Moreover, the application of predictive
maintenance frameworks can optimize the timing of refurbishing activities, ensuring that parts are repaired or replaced before failure, thus enhancing operational efficiency. The automotive industry exemplifies the successful application of CE strategies, particularly through remanufacturing practices for engines and transmissions. This approach conserves raw materials and reduces production costs and environmental impacts associated with manufacturing new components. By remanufacturing, companies can extend the lifecycle of automotive parts, minimizing waste and promoting resource efficiency (Reike et al., 2018) [43].

Remanufacturing can also lead to substantial reductions in material consumption, as it often utilizes existing components rather than relying solely on new materials (Schroeder et al., 2018) [51]. Furthermore, the integration of CE principles within the automotive sector aligns with broader sustainability goals, contributing to the achievement of the SDGs. The automotive industry's shift towards remanufacturing reflects a growing recognition of the economic and environmental benefits of circular practices, underscoring the potential for similar strategies across various industrial sectors (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018) [15]. The automotive industry's adoption of remanufacturing illustrates the practical application of CE strategies, showcasing the potential for reduced material consumption and enhanced sustainability in industrial engineering.

### 3.3 Waste-to-Resource Transformation

Waste-to-resource transformation is a pivotal strategy in the CE, which is aimed at converting industrial waste into valuable inputs, thereby closing the resource loop. This approach not only mitigates waste, but also enhances resource efficiency and sustainability across various sectors. For instance, the valorisation of fish waste into bioactive compounds exemplifies how waste can be transformed into economically valuable resources, contributing to both environmental sustainability and economic growth (Coppola et al. 2021) [10].

Moreover, the integration of advanced technologies in waste management, such as selective thermal transformation, allows for the conversion of hazardous waste into high-value materials, further promoting the circular economy. Research indicates that adopting waste-to-resource strategies can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of industries while simultaneously creating new revenue streams (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018) [15]. The transition from traditional waste management practices to innovative resource recovery methods is essential for achieving SDGs and fostering a resilient economy (Schroeder et al., 2018) [51]. The waste-to-resource transformation is a fundamental aspect of CE strategies in industrial engineering, facilitating sustainable practices that benefit both the environment and the economy. The innovations include the following:

*   **Bioenergy:** Bioenergy, derived from organic waste, represents a significant strategy in the CE, it facilitates energy production while simultaneously addressing waste management challenges. Utilizing organic waste for bioenergy generation not only reduces landfill dependency, but also transforms waste into a valuable resource, thereby closing the resource loop (Proskurina, 2024) [42]. The conversion processes, such as anaerobic digestion, allow for the efficient production of biogas

from various organic materials, including agricultural residues and municipal solid waste.

The integration of bioenergy systems can yield substantial economic, environmental, and social benefits. For instance, using production residues and waste can enhance biomass availability, leading to increased bioenergy output and reduced greenhouse gas emissions (Proskurina, 2024) [42]. Furthermore, the potential for bioenergy generation from urban waste highlights its role in promoting sustainable energy solutions, particularly in regions with high organic waste production.

*   **Material Recovery:** Defined as the extraction of raw materials from waste streams, material recovery is a crucial strategy in advancing CE principles within industrial engineering. This process minimizes waste and also promotes resource efficiency by transforming discarded materials into valuable inputs for production. For instance, the recovery of metals and plastics from electronic waste has demonstrated significant potential in reducing the demand for virgin materials, which conserves natural resources and also lowers environmental impacts (Mikhailova, 2024).

Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of various technologies in enhancing material recovery processes, such as advanced sorting techniques and hydro-metallurgical methods that improve the purity and yield of recovered materials. Additionally, integrating material recovery into existing supply chains can lead to substantial economic benefits, including reduced production costs and the creation of new revenue streams from recovered materials (Maier, 2022). The transition towards a circular economy through material recovery supports sustainable industrial practices and also aligns with global sustainability goals, fostering a more resilient and eco-friendly economy (Leela, 2024).

*   **Application:** The integration of waste-to-resource technology in the cement manufacturing sector exemplifies a successful application of CE principles. By utilizing industrial by-products such as fly ash and slag as inputs, cement manufacturers can significantly reduce both waste disposal and raw material costs. This approach which diverts waste from landfills also enhances the sustainability of production processes by minimizing the need for virgin materials, thereby conserving natural resources.

The application of alternative raw materials like fly ash and slag can improve the mechanical properties of cement while reducing the carbon footprint associated with traditional cement production. Moreover, this practice aligns with the broader goals of the circular economy, which emphasize resource efficiency and waste reduction. The successful implementation of such technologies in the cement industry serves as a model for other sectors aiming to adopt circular economy strategies, demonstrating the potential for economic and environmental benefits.

## 4. Tools and Techniques of Circular Economy

### 4.1 Life Cycle Analysis (LCA)

LCA is a critical tool that supports CE strategies as it evaluates the environmental impacts of products and processes throughout their lifecycle. By systematically assessing resource use and emissions from raw material
extraction to end-of-life disposal, LCA helps to identify areas for improvement, such as material substitution and process redesign (Duque-Acevedo et al., 2022) [12]. This holistic approach enables industries to make informed decisions that enhance sustainability and reduce ecological footprints. For instance, LCA can guide the selection of alternative materials that are less harmful to the environment, promoting the use of recycled or bio-based inputs instead of virgin resources (Duque-Acevedo et al., 2022) [12]. Additionally, LCA facilitates the optimization of production processes by highlighting inefficiencies and waste generation, thus supporting initiatives aimed at minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery. The application of LCA in various sectors, including agriculture and bioenergy, underscores its versatility and importance in advancing circular economy objectives.

## 4.2 Material Flow Optimization

Material flow optimization is a fundamental strategy within the CE that focuses on reducing waste and improving resource utilization across industrial processes. By analysing and enhancing the flow of materials, organizations can identify inefficiencies and implement changes that lead to significant reductions in waste generation and resource consumption (Miatto, 2024) [28]. This optimization contributes to environmental sustainability and also enhances economic performance by lowering operational costs associated with raw material procurement and waste disposal. For instance, the implementation of advanced technologies such as data analytics and process automation can facilitate real-time monitoring of material flows, enabling companies to make informed decisions that streamline operations (Batista et al., 2018) [6]. Also, adopting a circular supply chain approach allows businesses to recover valuable materials from waste streams, further enhancing resource efficiency and promoting a closed-loop system (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018) [15]. The integration of these practices aligns with the SDGs, particularly those related to responsible consumption and production (Schroeder et al., 2018) [51]. The techniques include the following:

*   **Process Mapping:** This is an essential technique for identifying inefficiencies in material usage within the framework of CE strategies. By visually representing the flow of materials through various stages of production, organizations can pinpoint areas where waste occurs and where resource utilization can be improved. This systematic approach not only facilitates the identification of bottlenecks and redundancies, but also supports the implementation of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing efficiency and sustainability (Meng, 2023). For example, process mapping can reveal opportunities for material substitution, allowing companies to replace less sustainable inputs with more eco-friendly alternatives, thereby reducing their environmental impact. Furthermore, by optimizing material flows, businesses can minimize waste generation and lower operational costs, contributing to a more sustainable production model. The integration of process mapping with other methodologies, such as LCA, can further enhance the understanding of material impacts throughout the product lifecycle, enabling more informed decision-making (Moktadir et al., 2018) [31].

*   **Simulation:** Simulation is a powerful tool in modelling material flows to test improvements within the

framework of circular economy strategies. By creating virtual representations of production processes, organizations can analyse the movement and transformation of materials throughout their lifecycle. This approach enables the identification of inefficiencies and potential enhancements in resource utilization, ultimately leading to reduced waste and improved sustainability (Schroeder et al., 2018; Miatto, 2024) [51, 28]. For instance, simulation can facilitate the evaluation of different scenarios, such as the introduction of alternative materials or changes in production techniques, allowing companies to assess the impacts of these modifications before implementation (Batista et al., 2018) [6]. Additionally, integrating simulation with other methodologies, such as LCA, can provide a comprehensive understanding of the environmental impacts associated with various material flows (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018) [15]. This holistic perspective is crucial for developing effective circular supply chains that prioritize resource recovery and minimize environmental footprints.

## 4.3 Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) is pivotal in designing closed-loop supply chains that ensure resource recovery and reuse, integral to circular economy strategies. This approach emphasizes the importance of reverse logistics, which facilitates the return of used products for recycling or remanufacturing, thereby minimizing waste and maximizing resource efficiency (Schroeder et al., 2018; Siregar, 2023) [51, 52]. By integrating reverse logistics into supply chain operations, companies can effectively reclaim valuable materials, reduce their reliance on virgin resources, and lower overall production costs.

The implementation of SSCM practices can significantly enhance a company's sustainability performance while also contributing to economic growth. For instance, the adoption of circular economy principles within supply chains can lead to improved product design, increased customer engagement, and the development of innovative business models that prioritize sustainability. Furthermore, the alignment of SSCM with the SDGs underscores its relevance in promoting responsible consumption and production patterns (Schroeder et al., 2018; Nwamekwe and Igbokwe, 2024) [51, 24, 36]. Reverse logistics is a critical component of circular economy strategies, facilitating the return of used products for recycling, remanufacturing, or proper disposal. This process enhances resource recovery and also minimizes waste, thereby contributing to a more sustainable supply chain (Geissdoerfer et al., 2018; Supanut, 2024) [15, 53]. By effectively managing reverse logistics, companies can reclaim valuable materials from end-of-life products, reducing their reliance on virgin resources and lowering overall production costs (Romero et al., 2021) [45].

The integration of reverse logistics into supply chain management enables organizations to design closed-loop systems that prioritize sustainability. For instance, companies can implement take-back programs that encourage consumers to return used products, which can then be processed for reuse or recycling (Ghaithan et al., 2023) [16]. This approach not only aligns with circular economy principles but also fosters customer loyalty and enhances brand reputation (Jones and Wynn, 2021) [22]. Furthermore, advancements in technology, such as Industry 4.0, can
optimize reverse logistics operations by improving tracking and inventory management, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing costs (Santos *et al.*, 2023) [50].

# 5. Challenges and Future Directions

## 5.1 Technical Challenges

The adoption of CE principles in industrial engineering faces several technical challenges that can hinder effective implementation. One significant hurdle is the integration of new technologies and processes that are necessary for transitioning from linear to circular systems. This often requires substantial investment in research and development, as well as the adaptation of existing infrastructure to accommodate new methods of resource recovery and waste management (Supanut, 2024) [53]. Moreover, the complexity of managing reverse logistics presents another challenge. Efficiently coordinating the return of used products for recycling or remanufacturing necessitates robust logistical frameworks and real-time data tracking systems, which can be difficult to establish (Angelis *et al.*, 2018) [2]. Additionally, the variability in product design and material composition complicates the recycling process, as different materials may require distinct handling and processing techniques. Furthermore, regulatory and standardization issues can impede the adoption of CE practices. The lack of uniform regulations across regions can create uncertainty for businesses looking to invest in circular initiatives. Addressing these technical challenges is crucial for enabling a successful transition to a circular economy, as they directly impact the feasibility and efficiency of implementing sustainable practices in industrial settings.

The transition to a CE in industrial engineering is significantly hindered by limited recycling technologies. These technological constraints restrict the ability to efficiently process and recover materials from end-of-life products, thereby impeding the overall effectiveness of circular strategies (Geissdoerfer *et al.*, 2018) [15]. For instance, many existing recycling processes are not capable of handling complex materials or multi-layered products, which are increasingly common in modern manufacturing (Supanut, 2024) [53]. This limitation results in a substantial amount of waste being sent to landfills rather than being recycled or repurposed. Moreover, the lack of advanced recycling technologies can lead to economic inefficiencies. Manufacturing companies may find it more cost-effective to produce new materials rather than invest in the development of recycling capabilities, which can discourage the adoption of circular practices. Additionally, the variability in material quality and composition complicates recycling efforts, as different materials often require distinct processing techniques (Romero *et al.*, 2021) [45].

To overcome these challenges, there is a pressing need for innovation in recycling technologies, including the development of more efficient sorting, processing, and remanufacturing methods (Ghaithan *et al.*, 2023) [16]. Collaborative efforts among industries, governments, and research institutions can facilitate the advancement of these technologies, ultimately supporting the transition to a more sustainable CE (Jones and Wynn, 2021) [22]. Challenges in material compatibility and design significantly impede the effective implementation of circular economy strategies in industrial engineering. One of the primary issues is the difficulty in recycling complex materials, which often consist of multiple components that are not easily separable (Vollmer

*et al.*, 2020) [54]. For instance, many consumer products are designed with a mix of materials that complicate recycling processes, leading to lower recovery rates and increased waste (Vollmer *et al.*, 2020) [54].

Moreover, the design of products often prioritizes aesthetics or functionality over recyclability, resulting in products that are not conducive to circular practices. This misalignment between design and recycling capabilities necessitates a paradigm shift towards designing for disassembly and material compatibility, which can enhance the recyclability of products and facilitate the recovery of valuable materials (Siregar, 2023) [52]. Adopting a circular design approach, which incorporates considerations for material compatibility from the outset, can significantly improve recycling outcomes and resource recovery (Siregar, 2023) [52]. Also, collaboration among stakeholders, including manufacturers, designers, and recyclers, is essential to develop innovative solutions that address these challenges and promote a more sustainable circular economy (Sabău-Popa *et al.*, 2022) [48].

## 5.2 Economic and Policy Barriers

The adoption of CE strategies in industrial engineering is significantly impeded by economic and policy barriers, which manifest in high implementation costs, lack of incentives, and inconsistent regulations. High initial costs associated with transitioning to circular practices deter many organizations from investing in necessary technologies and processes (Antonioli *et al.*, 2022). This financial burden is compounded by the absence of clear economic incentives, which are crucial for encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable practices. Without supportive policies that promote CE, companies may find it economically unviable to shift from traditional linear models to circular ones.

Moreover, inconsistent regulations across regions create uncertainty for businesses, making it challenging to develop long-term strategies for CE implementation (Nwamekwe *et al.*, 2024) [36]. The lack of a coherent regulatory framework can lead to confusion and misalignment among stakeholders, further complicating efforts to establish circular supply chains. Research indicates that a more unified approach to policy-making, including the establishment of clear guidelines and incentives for CE practices, is essential for overcoming these barriers. Policies that encourage investment in CE technologies and practices are essential for facilitating the transition from linear to circular systems in industrial engineering. High implementation costs often deter businesses from adopting CE practices, making it crucial for governments to provide financial incentives and support mechanisms that lower these barriers (Hysa *et al.*, 2020) [19]. For instance, targeted subsidies, tax breaks, and grants can stimulate investments in innovative recycling technologies and sustainable practices, enabling companies to transition more smoothly to circular models.

Moreover, the establishment of consistent regulatory frameworks is vital to create a stable environment for CE investments. Inconsistent regulations can lead to uncertainty, discouraging companies from committing to long-term circular strategies (Mocanu, 2024). By developing clear policies that promote CE principles, governments can foster a supportive ecosystem that encourages businesses to innovate and invest in sustainable practices. Public-private partnerships can play a significant role in advancing CE initiatives, as collaboration between stakeholders can enhance resource sharing and knowledge transfer (Centobelli
et al., 2020) [9]. Thus, comprehensive policies that incentivize investment in CE technologies and practices are crucial for overcoming economic barriers and promoting sustainable industrial development.

## 5.3 Future Research Areas

Emerging technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) present significant opportunities to enhance the implementation of CE strategies in industrial engineering. These technologies can facilitate improved resource management, optimize production processes, and enable real-time monitoring of materials throughout their lifecycle (Rosa et al., 2019; Bag and Pretorius, 2020) [46, 5]. For instance, AI can analyse large datasets to identify inefficiencies and suggest optimizations, while IoT devices can track the condition and location of materials, ensuring better utilization and reducing waste (Okpala and Okpala, 2024; Igbokwe et al., 2024b) [25, 39, 41].

The integration of AI and IoT into CE practices can lead to innovative business models that prioritize sustainability. For example, predictive maintenance powered by AI can extend the lifespan of machinery, while IoT-enabled systems can streamline reverse logistics by providing data on product returns and recycling processes (Awan et al., 2021) [4]. Furthermore, advancements in digital tools and materials science are essential for developing new sustainable materials that align with CE principles, thus enhancing the overall effectiveness of circular strategies. Future research should focus on developing frameworks that leverage these technologies to support CE initiatives, exploring their potential to transform traditional linear models into sustainable circular systems. By addressing the challenges associated with material compatibility and design, AI and IoT can significantly contribute to the successful implementation of circular economy strategies in industrial engineering.

## 6. Conclusion

This research paper which comprehensively explores CE strategies in industrial engineering, focused on practical and theoretical approaches to advancing sustainability. Key strategies, such as design for recycling, remanufacturing, and waste-to-resource transformation have been identified as pivotal in fostering resource efficiency, waste reduction, and environmental sustainability. These strategies underline the importance of shifting from traditional linear models to sustainable circular systems that maximize value recovery and minimize environmental impact.

The integration of advanced tools and techniques, including LCA, material flow optimization, and sustainable supply chain management play a crucial role in supporting CE initiatives. These tools enable industrial engineers to assess environmental impacts holistically, streamline resource flows, and implement closed-loop systems, thereby promoting responsible production and consumption. Additionally, innovations like bioenergy generation, material recovery technologies, and reverse logistics have demonstrated significant potential to transform waste into valuable resources, thereby contributing to economic growth and ecological preservation.

## 6.1 Challenges and Recommendations

Despite the promising potential of CE strategies, the paper acknowledges several technical, economic, and policy challenges. Limited recycling technologies, high

implementation costs, inconsistent regulations, and material compatibility issues which hinder the effective adoption of CE practices. Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach, including policy reforms, economic incentives, and investments in research and development. Governments, industries, and academic institutions must collaborate to foster innovation and develop scalable solutions that bridge the existing gaps.

Emerging technologies, such as AI and the IoT, present opportunities to enhance CE adoption. By enabling real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and data-driven decision-making, these technologies can optimize material recovery, improve efficiency, and facilitate the development of sustainable industrial ecosystems. Future research should focus on integrating these technologies with CE frameworks to achieve holistic and effective solutions.

## 6.2 Contribution to Industrial Engineering

This study emphasizes the transformative potential of CE principles in industrial engineering, demonstrating how sustainable practices can align economic objectives with environmental goals. The application of CE strategies in diverse sectors, such as cement manufacturing and bioenergy production, highlights their adaptability and scalability. By adopting CE practices, industries can achieve significant reductions in environmental footprints, enhance resource efficiency, and contribute to the achievement of SDGs. In conclusion, this research underscores the necessity of embedding circular principles into industrial practices to build a resilient and sustainable future. The successful implementation of CE strategies will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders, leveraging innovation, collaboration, and technology for effective transition from theory to practice.

## 7. References

1. Abdulnour S, Baril C, Abdul-Nour G, Gamache S. Implementation of industry 4.0 principles and tools: simulation and case study in a manufacturing SME. Sustainability. 2022;14(10):6336. DOI: 10.3390/su14106336.

2. Angelis R, Howard M, Miemczyk J. Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain. Prod Plan Control. 2018;29(6):425-437. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244.

3. Antonioli D, Ghisetti C, Mazzanti M, Nicolli F. Sustainable production: the economic returns of circular economy practices. Bus Strat Environ. 2022;31(5):2603-2617. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3046.

4. Awan U, Sroufe R, Shahbaz M. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus Strat Environ. 2021;30(4):2038-2060. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2731.

5. Bag S, Pretorius J. Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework. Int J Organ Anal. 2020;30(4):864-898. DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-04-2020-2120.

6. Batista L, Bourlakis M, Smart P, Maull R. In search of a circular supply chain prototype – a content-analysis-based literature review. Prod Plan Control. 2018;29(6):438-451. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502.

7. Bernal-Carrillo J. Development and redesign of flexible
packaging under sustainability criteria. Rev Cienc Tecnol. 2024;7(1):e253. DOI: 10.37636/recit.v7n1e253.

8. Bueno M. Exploring the potential and applications of additive manufacturing in repairs during the operation of a ship. Mar Technol. 2024. DOI: 10.5821/mt.13185.

9. Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Chiaroni D, Vecchio P, Urbinati A. Designing business models in circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus Strat Environ. 2020;29(4):1734-1749. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2466.

10. Coppola D, Lauritano C, Esposito F, Riccio G, Rizzo C, Pascale D. Fish waste: from problem to valuable resource. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(2):116. DOI: 10.3390/md19020116.

11. Cossel M, Wagner M, Lask J, Magenau E, Bauerle A, Cossel V, Winkler B, et al. Prospects of bioenergy cropping systems for a more social-ecologically sound bioeconomy. Agronomy. 2019;9(10):605. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9100605.

12. Duque-Acevedo M, Ulloa-Murillo L, Ureña L, Camacho-Ferre F, Mercl F, Tlustos C. Sustainable and circular agro-environmental practices: a review of the management of agricultural waste biomass in Spain and the Czech Republic. Waste Manag Res. 2022;41(5):955-969. DOI: 10.1177/0734242x221139122.

13. Esteva L, Kasliwal A, Kinzler M, Kim H, Keoleian G. Circular economy framework for automobiles: closing energy and material loops. J Ind Ecol. 2020;25(4):877-889. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13088.

14. Ezeanyim C, Onwurah O, Okoli N, Okpala CC. An Evaluation of Actual Costs of Rework and Scrap in Manufacturing Industries. J Multidiscip Eng Sci Technol. 2015;2(4). Available from: https://www.google.com.ng/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=HQOWVe9GczH8gei4YGwAQ&gws_rd=ssl#q=1.%09Ezeanyim%2C+C.%2C+Onwurah%2C+O.%2C+Okoli%2C+N.%2C+and+Okpala%2C+C.+%282015%29%2C+%E2%80%9CAn+Evaluation+of+Actual+Costs+of+Rework+and+Scrap+in+Manufacturing+Industry%E2%80%9D+Journal+of+Multidisciplinary+Engineering+Science+and+Technology.

15. Geissdoerfer M, Morioka S, Carvalho M, Evans S. Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. J Clean Prod. 2018;190:712-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159.

16. Ghaithan A, Alshammakhi Y, Mohammed A, Mazher K. Integrated impact of circular economy, industry 4.0, and lean manufacturing on sustainability performance of manufacturing firms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):5119. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20065119.

17. Giudice M, Chierici R, Mazzucchelli A, Fiano F. Supply chain management in the era of circular economy: the moderating effect of big data. Int J Logist Manag. 2020;32(2):337-356. DOI: 10.1108/ijlm-03-2020-0119.

18. Guan C, Yu T, Yú Z, Chen L, Chen Y. Repair of gear by laser cladding ni60 alloy powder: process, microstructure and mechanical performance. Appl Sci. 2022;13(1):319. DOI: 10.3390/app13010319.

19. Hysa E, Kruja A, Rehman N, Laurenti R. Circular economy innovation and environmental sustainability impact on economic growth: an integrated model for sustainable development. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):4831. DOI: 10.3390/su12124831.

20. Igbokwe NC, Okpala CC, Nwankwo CO. Industry 4.0

Implementation: A Paradigm Shift in Manufacturing. J Invent Eng Technol. 2024;6(1). Available from: https://jiengtech.com/index.php/INDEX/article/view/113/135.

21. Igbokwe NC, Okpala CC, Nwamekwe CO. The Implementation of Internet of Things in the Manufacturing Industry: An Appraisal. Int J Eng Res Dev. 2024;20(7). Available from: https://www.ijerd.com/paper/vol20-issue7/2007510516.pdf.

22. Jones P, Wynn M. The circular economy, resilience, and digital technology deployment in the mining and mineral industry. Int J Circ Econ Waste Manag. 2021;1(1):16-32. DOI: 10.4018/ijcewm.2021010102.

23. Joustra J, Flipsen B, Balkenende R. Circular design of composite products: a framework based on insights from literature and industry. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7223. DOI: 10.3390/su13137223.

24. Kerin M, Pham D. A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing. J Clean Prod. 2019;237:117805. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117805.

25. Leela D. Building a bioenergy system towards a circular bioeconomy in Africa. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2024;1338(1):012059. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1338/1/012059.

26. Maier D. The use of wood waste from construction and demolition to produce sustainable bioenergy—a bibliometric review of the literature. Int J Energy Res. 2022;46(9):11640-11658. DOI: 10.1002/er.8021.

27. Meng X. Integration of digital twin and circular economy in the construction industry. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):13186. DOI: 10.3390/su151713186.

28. Miatto A. Australia's circular economy metrics and indicators. J Ind Ecol. 2024;28(2):216-231. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13458.

29. Mikhailova L. Possibilities of landfills and solid waste sites for energy production in Ukraine. Naukovij Zhurnal "tehnika Ta Energetika". 2024;15(1):86-94. DOI: 10.31548/machinery/1.2024.86.

30. Mocanu A. Can the circular economy unlock sustainable business growth? Insights from qualitative research with specialists in Romania. Sustainability. 2024;16(5):2031. DOI: 10.3390/su16052031.

31. Moktadir M, Rahman T, Rahman H, Ali S, Paul S. Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: a perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:1366-1380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.063.

32. Moraga G, Huysveld S, Mathieux F, Blengini G, Alaerts L, Acker K, et al. Circular economy indicators: what do they measure?. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;146:452-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045.

33. Nascimento D, Alencastro V, Quelhas O, Caiado R, Garza-Reyes J, Rocha-Lona L, et al. Exploring industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2019;30(3):607-627. DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-03-2018-0071.

34. Nwamekwe CO, Igbokwe NC. Supply chain risk management: leveraging AI for risk identification, mitigation, and resilience planning. Int J Ind Eng Technol Oper Manag. 2024;2(2):41-51. DOI: 10.62157/ijietom.v2i2.38.

35. Nwamekwe CO, Ewuzie NV, Igbokwe NC, Okpala CC,
U-Dominic CM. Sustainable manufacturing practices in Nigeria: optimization and implementation appraisal. J Res Eng Appl Sci. 2024;9(3). Available from: https://qtanalytics.in/journals/index.php/JREAS/article/view/3967.

36. Nwamekwe CO, Ewuzie NV, Igbokwe NC, U-Dominic CM, Nwabueze CV. Adoption of smart factories in Nigeria: problems, obstacles, remedies and opportunities. Int J Ind Prod Eng. 2024;2(2). Available from: https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/ijipe/article/view/4167.

37. Obiuto N. Implementing circular economy principles to enhance safety and environmental sustainability in manufacturing. IJAMRS. 2024;4(2):22-29.
DOI: 10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.2.2432.

38. Okpala CC, Udu CE. Industrial waste management in the era of climate change: challenges, strategies, and opportunities. Int J Eng Res Dev. 2025;21(1). Available from: https://ijerd.com/paper/vol21-issue1/21015667.pdf.

39. Okpala SC, Okpala CC. The application of artificial intelligence to digital healthcare in the Nigerian tertiary hospitals: mitigating the challenges. J Eng Res Dev. 2024;20(4). Available from: http://ijerd.com/paper/vol20-issue4/20047681.pdf.

40. Okpala CC, Nwankwo CO, Onu CE. Lean production system implementation in an original equipment manufacturing company: benefits, challenges, and critical success factors. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2020;9(7). Available from: https://www.ijert.org/volume-09-issue-07-july-2020.

41. Okpala CC. Tackling Muda – The inherent wastes in manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Eng Technol. 2014;5(4). Available from: http://technicaljournalsonline.com/ijeat/VOL%20V/IJA ET%20VOL%20V%20ISSUE%20IV%20%20OCTBE R%20DECEMBER%202014/Vol%20V%20Issue%20I V%20Article%202.pdf.

42. Proskurina S. Perspectives on challenges to bioenergy use in the EU. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. 2024;18(4):938-951. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2639.

43. Reike D, Vermeulen W, Witjes S. The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0? — exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;135:246-264.
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027.

44. Ren S, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Sakao T, Huisingh D, Almeida C. A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: a framework, challenges and future research directions. J Clean Prod. 2019;210:1343-1365.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.025.

45. Romero C, Castro D, Ortíz J, Khalaf O, Vargas M. Synergy between circular economy and industry 4.0: a literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4331.
DOI: 10.3390/su13084331.

46. Rosa P, Sassanelli C, Urbinati A, Chiaroni D, Terzi S. Assessing relations between circular economy and industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Int J Prod Res. 2019;58(6):1662-1687.
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896.

47. Roy M. Implementation of an industry 4.0 strategy

adapted to manufacturing SMEs: simulation and case study. Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15423.
DOI: 10.3390/su152115423.

48. Sabău-Popa C, Bele A, Dodescu A, Boloş M. How does the circular economy applied in the European Union support sustainable economic development?. Sustainability. 2022;14(16):9932.
DOI: 10.3390/su14169932.

49. Sahoo S. Industry 4.0 deployment for circular economy performance—understanding the role of green procurement and remanufacturing activities. Bus Strat Environ. 2023;33(2):1144-1160.
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3542.

50. Santos M, Rolo A, Matos D, Carvalho L. The circular economy in corporate reporting: text mining of energy companies' management reports. Energies. 2023;16(15):5791. DOI: 10.3390/en16155791.

51. Schroeder P, Anggraeni K, Weber U. The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. J Ind Ecol. 2018;23(1):77-95.
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12732.

52. Siregar M. Application of circular economy in manufacturing industry in Indonesia. Amca J Commun Dev. 2023;3(1):19-24. DOI: 10.51773/ajcd.v3i1.211.

53. Supanut A. Circular economy strategies in practice: a qualitative examination of industry adaptation and innovation. Rev Gest Soc Amb. 2024;18(3):e06723.
DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-121.

54. Vollmer I, Jenks M, Roelands M, White R, Harmelen T, Wild P, et al. Beyond mechanical recycling: giving new life to plastic waste. Angew Chem. 2020;59(36):15402-15423. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201915651.

55. Wiah E, Addor J, Alao F. Transitional probabilities for plastic waste management and implication on sustainability. Sustain Environ. 2022, 8(1).
DOI: 10.1080/27658511.2022.2118654