# Corrigendum: Physiological and transcriptional responses to saline irrigation of young ‘Tempranillo’ vines grafted onto different rootstocks

Ignacio Buesa, Juan G. Perez-Perez, Fernando Visconti, Rebeka Strah, Diego

S. Intrigliolo, Luis Bonet, Kristina Gruden, Marusa Pompe-Novak, Jose M. de Paz

► To cite this version:

Ignacio Buesa, Juan G. Perez-Perez, Fernando Visconti, Rebeka Strah, Diego S. Intrigliolo, et al. Corrigendum: Physiological and transcriptional responses to saline irrigation of young ‘Tempranillo’ vines grafted onto different rootstocks. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 10.3389/fpls.2022.1011533. [https://hal-03954607](https://hal-03954607)

HAL Id: hal-03954607

https://hal.science/hal-03954607

Submitted on 24 Jan 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED AND REVIEWED BY
Tommaso Frioni,
Catholic University of the Sacred
Heart, Piacenza, Italy

*CORRESPONDENCE
Ignacio Buesa
igbuepue@gmail.com

SPECIALTY SECTION
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

RECEIVED 04 August 2022
ACCEPTED 09 September 2022
PUBLISHED 26 September 2022

CITATION

Buesa I, Pérez-Pérez JG, Visconti F, Strah R, Intrigliolo DS, Bonet L, Gruden K, Pompe-Novak M and de Paz JM (2022) Corrigendum: Physiological and transcriptional responses to saline irrigation of young 'Tempranillo' vines grafted onto different rootstocks.
*Front. Plant Sci.* 13:1011533.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1011533

COPYRIGHT

© 2022 Buesa, Pérez-Pérez, Visconti, Strah, Intrigliolo, Bonet, Gruden, Pompe-Novak and de Paz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

# Corrigendum: Physiological and transcriptional responses to saline irrigation of young 'Tempranillo' vines grafted onto different rootstocks

Ignacio Buesa¹,²,³*, Juan G. Pérez-Pérez¹, Fernando Visconti¹,⁴,
Rebeka Strah⁵,⁶, Diego S. Intrigliolo⁴, Luis Bonet¹,
Kristina Gruden⁵, Maruša Pompe-Novak⁵,⁷
and Jose M. de Paz¹

¹Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Centro para el Desarrollo de la Agricultura Sostenible, Unidad Asociada al CSIC "Riego en la Agricultura Mediterránea", Valencia, Spain,
²Ecophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, Villenave d'Ornon, France, ³Research Group on Plant Biology Under Mediterranean Conditions, Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain, ⁴Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación, Departmento de Ecología (CSIC, UV, GV), Valencia, Spain, ⁵Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia, ⁶Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, ⁷School for Viticulture and Enology, University of Nova Gorica, Vipava, Slovenia

KEYWORDS

osmotic adjustment, gas exchange, gene expression, water relations, *Vitis vinifera* L.
( grapevine), salinity tolerance

A Corrigendum on

Physiological and transcriptional responses to saline irrigation of
young 'Tempranillo' vines grafted onto different rootstocks.

by Buesa I, Pérez-Pérez JG, Visconti F, Strah R, Intrigliolo DS, Bonet L, Gruden K, Pompe-Novak M and de Paz JM (2022) Front. Plant Sci. 13:866053. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.866053

In the original article, there was an error. In Table 2 the units shown for chlorides (Cl) are not correct. To solve this problem, we include the Table transforming the units to those of the rest of the elements.

A correction has been made to Table 2:

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
<table><caption>TABLE 2 Leaf area index (LAI) and leaf nutritional status in leaf blades from *Vitis vinifera* (L.) cv. Tempranillo grafted onto M1, M4 and 1103-Paulsen (1P) rootstocks subjected to different water quality (C; control and S; saline irrigation) on DOY 233 of 2019 in Valencia, Spain.</caption><thead><tr><th>Factors</th><th>Treatment</th><th>LAI (m<sup>2</sup> m<sup>-2</sup>)</th><th>N (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Cl (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Ca (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>K (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Na (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>Mg (g 100g<sup>-1</sup>)</th><th>K/Ca</th><th>K/Na</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="3">R</td><td>1P</td><td>1.8</td><td>2.26b</td><td>0.75a</td><td>2.01a</td><td>0.73</td><td>0.003a</td><td>0.41ab</td><td>0.37b</td><td>353.0b</td></tr><tr><td>M1</td><td>1.8</td><td>2.12ab</td><td>1.35b</td><td>2.36b</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.004b</td><td>0.39a</td><td>0.28a</td><td>185.5a</td></tr><tr><td>M4</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.07a</td><td>1.24b</td><td>1.94a</td><td>0.66</td><td>0.003a</td><td>0.46b</td><td>0.35ab</td><td>260.8ab</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">WQ</td><td>Control</td><td>2.0b</td><td>2.15</td><td>0.67a</td><td>1.93a</td><td>0.74b</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.40a</td><td>0.40</td><td>287.7a</td></tr><tr><td>Saline</td><td>1.7a</td><td>2.15</td><td>1.54b</td><td>2.28b</td><td>0.61a</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.44b</td><td>0.44</td><td>245.1b</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="7">Interaction R × WQ</td><td>1P C</td><td>1.8</td><td>2.33</td><td>0.54</td><td>1.9</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.004abc</td><td>0.40</td><td>0.42</td><td>313.7</td></tr><tr><td>1P S</td><td>1.8</td><td>2.19</td><td>0.94</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.002a</td><td>0.42</td><td>0.32</td><td>392.3</td></tr><tr><td>M1 C</td><td>2.1</td><td>2.08</td><td>0.79</td><td>2.2</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.004bc</td><td>0.36</td><td>0.33</td><td>235.3</td></tr><tr><td>M1 S</td><td>1.5</td><td>2.16</td><td>1.89</td><td>2.5</td><td>0.59</td><td>0.005c</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.24</td><td>135.6</td></tr><tr><td>M4 C</td><td>2.0</td><td>2.04</td><td>0.68</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.003ab</td><td>0.44</td><td>0.44</td><td>314.2</td></tr><tr><td>M4 S</td><td>1.8</td><td>2.10</td><td>1.79</td><td>2.2</td><td>0.58</td><td>0.003abc</td><td>0.48</td><td>0.27</td><td>207.3</td></tr><tr><td>Rootstock</td><td></td><td>0.89</td><td><strong>0.04</strong></td><td><strong>&lt;0.01</strong></td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>0.25</td><td><strong>0.02</strong></td><td><strong>0.05</strong></td><td><strong>0.04</strong></td><td><strong>0.05</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Water Quality</td><td></td><td></td><td><strong>0.03</strong></td><td>0.99</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td><strong>&lt;0.01</strong></td><td>0.98</td><td><strong>0.04</strong></td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>0.42</td></tr><tr><td>R × WQ</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.08</td><td>0.33</td><td>0.09</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.72</td><td><strong>0.05</strong></td><td>0.61</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.27</td></tr></tbody></table>

Data are averages of 6, 9 and 3 determinations per rootstock, water quality and rootstock per water quality respectively. For each parameter, letters denote significant differences between treatments at *p* < 0.05 (Duncan test). The statistical significance effect of the rootstock (R), water quality (WQ) and their interaction are also indicated by means of the *p*-values from the ANOVAs. Significance of effects in bold denotes statistically significant differences at *p* < 0.05.

## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated

organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.