# Virulence and antibiotic resistance profile of avian Escherichia coli strains isolated from colibacillosis lesions in central of Algeria

Nacima Meguenni, Nathalie Chanteloup, Angélina Trotereau, Chafika Ali Ahmed, Saliha Bounar-Kechih, Catherine Schouler

► To cite this version:

Nacima Meguenni, Nathalie Chanteloup, Angélina Trotereau, Chafika Ali Ahmed, Saliha Bounar-Kechih, et al.. Virulence and antibiotic resistance profile of avian Escherichia coli strains isolated from colibacillosis lesions in central of Algeria. Veterinary World, 2019, 12 (11), pp.1840-1848. 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1840-1848. hal-02624051

HAL Id: hal-02624051

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02624051

Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>
# Virulence and antibiotic resistance profile of avian *Escherichia coli* strains isolated from colibacillosis lesions in central of Algeria

Nacima Meguenni¹, Nathalie Chanteloup², Angelina Tourtereau², Chafika Ali Ahmed¹, Saliha Bounar-Kechih³ and Catherine Schouler²

1. Laboratory of Analytic Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Mouloud Mammeri University, Tizi Ouzou 15000, Algeria;

2. ISP, INRA, Université de Tours, UMR 1282, 37 380, Nouzilly, France; 3. Regional Veterinary Laboratory of Draa Ben Khedda, Tizi Ouzou 15000, Algeria.

**Corresponding author:** Nacima Meguenni, e-mail: nmeguenni@yahoo.fr

**Co-authors:** NC: nathalie.chanteloup@inra.fr, AT: angelina.trotereau@inra.fr, CAA: titousad@yahoo.fr, SB: sbounar_labvet@yahoo.fr, CS: catherine.schouler@inra.fr

**Received:** 18-07-2019, **Accepted:** 15-10-2019, **Published online:** 25-11-2019

**doi:** www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1840-1848 **How to cite this article:** Meguenni N, Chanteloup N, Tourtereau A, Ahmed CA, Bounar-Kechih S, Schouler C (2019) Virulence and antibiotic resistance profile of avian *Escherichia coli* strains isolated from colibacillosis lesions in central of Algeria, *Veterinary World*, 12(11): 1840-1848.

## Abstract

**Background and Aim:** Avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* cause extensive mortality in poultry flocks, leading to extensive economic losses. To date, in Algeria, little information has been available on virulence potential and antibiotics resistance of avian *E. coli* isolates. Therefore, the aim of this study was the characterization of virulence genes and antibiotic resistance profile of Algerian *E. coli* strains isolated from diseased broilers.

**Materials and Methods:** In this study, 43 avian *E. coli* strains isolated from chicken colibacillosis lesions at different years were analyzed to determine their contents in 10 virulence factors by polymerase chain reaction, antimicrobial susceptibility to 22 antibiotics belonging to six different chemical classes and genomic diversity by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

**Results:** Mainly *E. coli* isolates (58.1%) carried two at six virulence genes and the most frequent virulence gene association detected were ompT (protectin), hlyF (hemolysin) with 55.8% (p<0.001), and iroN, sitA (iron acquisition/uptake systems), and iss (protectin) with 41.8% (p<0.001). Some strains were diagnosed as virulent according to their virulence gene profile. Indeed, 23.25% of the isolates harbored iroN, ompT, hlyF, iss, and sitA combination, 14% ompT, hlyF, and *frz*<sub>orf4</sub> (sugar metabolism), and 11,6% iroN, hlyF, ompT, iss, iutA (iron acquisition/uptake systems), and *frz*<sub>orf4</sub>. The chicken embryo lethality assay performed on five isolates confirmed the potential virulence of these strains. All isolates submitted to PFGE analysis yielded different genetic profiles, which revealed their diversity. Overall, 97.2% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic and 53.5% demonstrated multi-antimicrobial resistance to three different antimicrobial classes. The highest resistance levels were against nalidixic acid (83.4%), amoxicillin and ampicillin (83.3%), ticarcillin (80.5%), pipemidic acid (75%), and triméthoprim-sulfamethoxazole (66.6%). For beta-lactam class, the main phenotype observed belonged to broad-spectrum beta-lactamases. However, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase associated with three at six virulence factors was also detected in 13 isolates. Two of them were attested virulent as demonstrated in the embryo lethality test which constitutes a real public threat.

**Conclusion:** It would be imperative in avian production to discourage misuse while maintaining constant vigilance guidelines and regulations, to limit and rationalize antimicrobial use.

**Keywords:** antibiotic resistance, avian *Escherichia coli*, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, virulence.

## Introduction

Poultry farming is undeniably the branch of animal production that has recorded a remarkable development in Algeria in recent years [1]. The poultry sector, which is 90% dominated by the private sector, has in less than a decade a significant leap with a considerable animal wealth of 240 million broilers and turkeys. However, the poultry industry still retains a dual character (industrial and artisanal models) [1]. In Algeria, as well as many other countries, colibacillosis

is one of the most common bacterial infections in poultry and one of the main causes of mortality in chickens and turkeys, leading to significant losses in industrial poultry farming and carcass condemnations at slaughterhouse. The subgroup avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (APEC) is the etiologic agent of colibacillosis in chickens. Indeed, *E. coli* is a versatile species encompassing both commensals of the digestive tracts of many vertebrates, including humans, and pathogenic strains causing various intra- and extra-intestinal infections as a cause of airsacculitis, polyserositis, septicemia, poor growth performance, and carcass condemnation in affected flocks [2,3]. The disease-inducing potential of these isolates has been explained by the occurrence of specific virulence factors. Indeed, many virulence factors have been associated with APEC strains, although their role in the pathogenesis is not well known [4].

Copyright: Meguenni, et al. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
In animal production, antimicrobials are widely used as a growth promoter and in the treatment of infectious diseases. The use of antimicrobials in poultry production industries for the promotion of growth largely contributes to the high resistance to antimicrobial agents in normal flora of poultry and pathogenic microorganism [5].

Due to its ubiquity, *E. coli* has become one of the bacterial species that are commonly resistant to antibiotics and can transmit antibiotic-resistance genes from other *Enterobacteriaceae* species in the environment [6,7]. To date, little information has been available on characteristics of avian *E. coli* isolates in Algeria, especially their virulence factors content and antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was the characterization of virulence genes and antibiotic resistance profile of Algerian *E. coli* strains isolated from diseased broilers.

## Materials and Methods

### Ethical approval

The tests on embryonated eggs do not require authorization from the ethics committee.

### Isolation of *E. coli* strains

A total of 43 chicken visceral organs (liver, lungs, heart, and spleen) were collected randomly between 2006 and 2013 from diseased chicken broilers from different poultry farms located in various regions of Central Algeria (Provinces of Bouira, Bejaia, Tizi Ouzou, and Boumerdes).

All farms were all-in, all-out intensive systems either in cages or on litter floors. Samples of these organs were cultured in brain and heart infusion broth then subcultured on MacConkey agar plates and on desoxycholate agar. The plates were incubated under aerobic conditions at 37°C for 72 h. *E. coli* isolates identification was confirmed by detecting *uidA* gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [8].

### Virulence gene detection

Template DNA was prepared using the boiling method [9]. PCR reactions were performed according to published protocols [10,11]. The genes that were searched for were as follows: Adhesins (*papC* and *felA*), hemolysin (*hlyF*), protectins (*iss* and *ompT*), iron acquisition/uptake systems (*iroN*, *iutA*, and *sitA*), component of a T6SS (*aec26*), and sugar metabolism (*frz*<sub>orf4</sub>). The *E. coli* strains used as positive controls in PCR assays were as follows: BEN 2908 [12,13] for *iutA*, *ompT*, *iss*, *sitA*, *aec26*, and *frz*<sub>orf4</sub>, MT189 for *felA*, and BEN 2905 (J96) for *papC*.

### Antimicrobial sensitivity testing

This test was performed by disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar using 22 antibiotic disk belonging to different antimicrobial classes including amoxicillin (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg/disc), ticarcillin (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg/disc), aztreonam (30 µg/disc), cefazolin (30 µg), cefoxitin (10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg),

ceftazidime (30 µg), cefixime (30 µg), cefpirome (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg/disc), tetracycline (30 µg), sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), colistin (25 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), pipemidic acid (20 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), and pefloxacin (5 µg). The presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) was detected by double-disc synergy method. Interpretation of the results was done according to CA-SFM procedures [14]. *E. coli* CIP7624 was used as quality control.

### Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE was performed using the restriction enzyme *Xba*I as described by Moulin-Schouleur et al. [15]. Agarose plugs were prepared from a bacterial culture grown in brain heart infusion broth to an optical density (OD) at 600 nm of 1.0. After incubation for 2 h at 37°C in a lysozyme solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9, 100 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5 mg/ml lysozyme, 0.05% sarkosyl), they were then incubated overnight at 55°C (without shaking) in a lysis solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH9, 100 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml proteinase K, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) and washed 3 times for 1 h each time in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA).

For digestion, plugs were equilibrated in incubation buffer (Takara) containing 10 units *Xba*I restriction enzyme (Takara Bio Europe). PFGE was conducted in a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad). Gels (1% agarose) were run at 14°C for 24 h in TBE buffer (4 mM Tris, 4 mM borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) at 6 V/cm. PFGE was conducted in a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad). The gels (1% agarose) were run at 14°C for 24 h in TBE buffer (Tris, 4 mM; borate, 4 mM; EDTA, 1 mM; pH 8.3) at 6 V/cm. The pulse times were increased from 10 to 30 s. As size markers, *Xba*I restriction fragments of *Salmonella enterica* serovar Braenderup H9812 were used. Cluster analysis using dice similarity indices was done in BioNumerics 6.6 software (at 0.5% tolerance and 0.5% optimization) (Applied Maths, Ghent, Belgium) to determine similarities and differences and to find or characterize the relationships among isolates.

### Chicken embryo lethality test

The method followed for this assay was described by Nolan et al. [16] and adapted by Trotereau and Schouler [17]. Virulence of five *E. coli* isolates (three ESBL and two broad-spectrum β-lactamases) was tested by the inoculation of washed bacterial cultures into the allantoic cavity of 11-day-old specific-pathogen-free chicken embryos. About 1.5 ml of overnight cultures of isolates grown in lysogeny broth (LB) at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm) were briefly centrifuged and resuspended in 1.5 mL of sterile/apyrogenic Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). After the measurement of the OD at 600 nm, the inoculum was adjusted at a concentration of $10^3$ cfu/mL. The inoculation dose was confirmed by retrospective plating of serial dilutions onto LB agar plates. For inoculation, 100 µL of the
diluted culture was administered into the allantoic cavity of 20 embryos per isolate and 10 eggs with 100 µL of sterile/apyrogenic DPBS. Embryos were candled once daily for 6 days post-challenge to monitor mortality. The data of survival were presented as Kaplan-Meier curves and analyzed using the log-rank test.

## Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and p-values were calculated using a Chi-square test to find any significant relationship. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The proportion comparison Rprop test was performed using the statistical program R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

## Results

Identification of 43 isolates as E. coli was confirmed by the presence of the *uidA* gene in all isolates. PCR analysis for virulence factors of the 43 E. coli strains according to both [10,11] diagnostics showed that 55.8% of the isolates harbored *hlyF* and *ompT* genes; 41.8% *iroN*, *iss*, and *sitA* genes. To a lesser extent, *iutA* genes and *frz<sub>orfA</sub>* fragment were detected in 13.9% of the isolates and *felA* gene on only 2.3% of the strains tested. In contrast, no isolate contained *aec26* gene (Table-1).

Otherwise, the strains had highly variable content of virulence genes. 11.6% of the isolates associated simultaneously up to six virulence factors and the association of *iroN*, *ompT*, *hlyF*, *iss*, and *sitA* factors dominated with 23.25% (p<0.001). The *ompT*, *hlyF*, and *frz<sub>orfA</sub>* combination was present in 14% of the strains, followed by *papC*, *felA*, *iroN*, *ompT*, *hlyF*, and *iss* alone and associated with *iutA* in 2.3% of the strains studied. About 41.9% did not show any of the searched virulence factors.

## APEC diagnosis

E. coli strains (37.2%) were considered as potentially highly virulent APEC, according to Johnson *et al.* [10], which classify an E. coli as pathogenic based on the presence of minimum four of five virulence genes carried by plasmids associated with highly pathogenic APEC. Insight, the embryos mortality rate exceeding 40% after 3 days, the lethality test on chicken embryo confirmed the pathogenicity of the most tested isolates comprising two (E48 and E88) ESBL profile (Figure-1).

In contrast, all isolate strains were considered non-typable according to Schouler *et al.* [11]. Eighteen isolates were considered as non-pathogenic strains regarding these both diagnostics. The most prevalent pattern with 23.25% of strains associate five virulence genes *iroN*, *ompT*, *hlyF*, *iss*, and *sitA* (Table-2). Regarding the search for virulence factors, high significant difference was found for the majority of genes proportions studied (p<2.2 e<sup>-16</sup>).

## Antibiotic resistance

Susceptibility study to 22 antibiotics belonging to seven chemical families of 36 isolates, from the

<table><caption>**Table-1:** Virulence genes detected in avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* isolates.</caption><thead><tr><th>Virulence factor</th><th>Frequency</th><th>Percentage</th><th>p-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>iroN</td><td>18/43</td><td>41.80</td><td>1.203×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>iutA</td><td>6/43</td><td>13.90</td><td>4.482×10<sup>-15***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>ompT</td><td>24/43</td><td>55.80</td><td>2.89×10<sup>-6***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>iss</td><td>18/43</td><td>41.80</td><td>1.203×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>hlyF</td><td>24/43</td><td>55.80</td><td>2.89×10<sup>-6***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>papC</td><td>1/43</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>felA</td><td>1/43</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>frz<sub>orfA</sub></td><td>6/43</td><td>13.90</td><td>4.482×10<sup>-15***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>aec26</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>sitA</td><td>18/43</td><td>41.80</td><td>1.203×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>No factor</td><td>18/43</td><td>41.80</td><td>1.203×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

***Very highly significant value. *iutA* (aerobactin siderophore receptor gene), *hlyF* (putative avian hemolysin), *iss* (episomal increased serum survival gene), *iroN* (salmochelin siderophore receptor gene), and *ompT* (episomal outer membrane protease gene), *frz<sub>orfA</sub>* (sugar metabolism), *aec26* (component of a T6SS), *sitA* (iron transport gene)

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Figure-1:** Chicken embryo test result on avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* isolates. BEN 2908 APEC virulent strain; BEN 5048 negative control strains; E11, E48, and E88: ESBL profile; strains 40/10 and 57/10: broad-spectrum beta-lactamase profile.</figcaption></figure>

collection of E. coli outcome colibacillosis lesions, revealed the sensitivity of a single isolate to all antibiotics. One isolate (2.7%) was resistant to a single molecule of antibiotic and 34 isolates (70.12%) to more than two antibiotics. In addition, a multidrug resistance observed on 53.5% of isolates covered more than 3 classes of antibiotics. In contrast, no resistance to colistin and imipenem was observed in studied isolates. The sensitivity and resistance profiles of the isolates tested are summarized in Table-3.

Regarding beta-lactams, the results showed that the highest resistance rates were observed for aminopenicillins represented by ampicillin and amoxicillin and ticarcillin in the carboxypenicillin group with 83.3% and 80.5%, respectively. Average levels were noted with respect to other beta-lactams such as aztreonam (37.1%) and cefazolin (58.8%), cefotaxime (36.1%), cefixime (40%), and ceftazidime (43.3%), respectively, of the group of monobactams and cephalosporins of the first generation and third generation. The lowest resistance rates were recorded in the association amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (16.7%), the
<table><caption>**Table-2:** Virulence profile of avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* isolates.</caption><thead><tr><th>Virulence profile</th><th>Virulence factor number</th><th>Frequency n=43</th><th>Percentage</th><th>p-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>iroN ompT iss hlyF iutA sitA</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>11.60</td><td>9.425×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>iroN ompT hlyF iss iutA</td><td>5</td><td>1</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>iroN ompT hlyF iss sitA</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>23.25</td><td>1.286×10<sup>-12***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>ompT hlyF iss</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>ompT hlyF frz<sub>orf4</sub></td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>14.00</td><td>4.482×10<sup>-15***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>papC felA</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>sitA</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>2.30</td><td>2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>None factor</td><td>0</td><td>18</td><td>41.80</td><td>1.203×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

***Very highly significant value

<table><caption>**Table-3:** Susceptibility and resistance rates to antibiotics of avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* isolates.</caption><thead><tr><th>Antibiotic</th><th>Number of isolates</th><th>Frequency and percentage of susceptibility (%)</th><th>Frequency and percentage of intermediate (%)</th><th>Frequency and percentage of resistance (%)</th><th>p-value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>AMX</td><td>36</td><td>5 (13.8)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>30 (83.3)</td><td>3.901×10<sup>-14***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>AMP</td><td>36</td><td>5 (13.8)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>30 (83.3)</td><td>3.901×10<sup>-14***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>AMC</td><td>36</td><td>10 (27.7)</td><td>20 (55.6)</td><td>6 (16.7)</td><td>0.001503***</td></tr><tr><td>TIC</td><td>36</td><td>6 (16.7)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>29 (80.5)</td><td>5.23110<sup>-13***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>IPM</td><td>36</td><td>38 (100)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>&lt;2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>ATM</td><td>35</td><td>20 (57.1)</td><td>2 (5.8)</td><td>13 (37.1)</td><td>527×10<sup>-5***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CZ</td><td>34</td><td>9 (26.5)</td><td>5 (14.7)</td><td>20 (58.8)</td><td>0.0003404***</td></tr><tr><td>FOX</td><td>35</td><td>27 (77.1)</td><td>7 (20)</td><td>1 (2.9)</td><td>4.481×10<sup>-11***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CTX</td><td>36</td><td>21 (58.3)</td><td>2 (5.6)</td><td>13 (36.1)</td><td>1.148×10<sup>-5***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CAZ</td><td>30</td><td>15 (50)</td><td>2 (6.7)</td><td>13 (43.3)</td><td>0.0006426***</td></tr><tr><td>CFM</td><td>35</td><td>20 (57.1)</td><td>1 (2.9)</td><td>14 (40)</td><td>5.403×10<sup>-6***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CPO</td><td>19</td><td>16 (84.2)</td><td>1 (5.3)</td><td>2 (10.5)</td><td>5.829×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>K</td><td>35</td><td>18 (51.4)</td><td>2 (5.8)</td><td>15 (42.8)</td><td>9.142×10<sup>-5***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>GEN</td><td>36</td><td>34 (94.4)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>&lt;2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>TE</td><td>35</td><td>15 (42.9)</td><td>0</td><td>20 (57.1)</td><td>8.931×10<sup>-7***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CL</td><td>35</td><td>35 (100)</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>&lt;2.2×10<sup>-16***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>SXT</td><td>36</td><td>11 (30.6)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>24 (66.6)</td><td>6.024×10<sup>-8***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>NA</td><td>36</td><td>5 (13.8)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>30 (83.4)</td><td>3.901×10<sup>-14***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>PA</td><td>36</td><td>4 (11.2)</td><td>5 (13.8)</td><td>27 (75)</td><td>6.692×10<sup>-10***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>CIP</td><td>35</td><td>14 (40)</td><td>0</td><td>21 (60)</td><td>4.129×10<sup>-7***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>OFX</td><td>36</td><td>12 (33.4)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>23 (63.8)</td><td>2.7×10<sup>-7***</sup></td></tr><tr><td>PF</td><td>35</td><td>15 (42.9)</td><td>1 (2.8)</td><td>19 (54.3)</td><td>1.028×10<sup>-5***</sup></td></tr></tbody></table>

The proportion comparison $\chi^2$ test performed for a value of $\alpha=5\%$; ***Very highly significant value. AMX=Amoxicillin, AMP=Ampicillin, AMC=Amoxicillin+clavulanic acid, TIC=Ticarcillin, IPM=Imipenem, ATM=Aztreonam, CZ=Céfazolin, FOX=Cefoxitin, CTX=Cefotaxime, CAZ=Ceftazidime, CFM=Cefixime, CPO=Cefpirome, K=Kanamycin, GEN=Gentamicin, TE=Tetracycline, CL=Colistin, SXT=Triméthoprim+sulfamethoxazole, NA= nalidixic acid, PA=Pipemidic acid, CIP=Ciprofloxacin, OFX=Ofloxacin, PF=Pefloxacin

fourth-generation cephalosporins (cefpirome 10.5%) with the extreme value (2.9%) recorded for cefoxitin, the second-generation cephalosporin.

It should be noted that resistance to beta-lactams is associated with resistance to all other classes with the predominance of aminoglycoside with 14 isolates (38.8%) and beta-lactams-aminoglycoside-tetracycline-quinolones combination with 13 isolates (36.1%).

The analysis of the beta-lactam resistance profiles for all isolates according to CA-SFM [14] and Livermore et al. [18] showed that the main mechanism of resistance was the production of beta-lactamases. The majority of isolates (44.4%) carried broad-spectrum β-lactamases followed by the presence of ESBL on 36.1% of isolates and a single AmpC high-level cephalosporinase isolate.

Twenty-five strains (56.80%) carried at least one virulence factor and the profiles observed on the latter showed that the isolates were resistant to

at least four antibiotics and also up to 16 antibiotics simultaneously.

The distribution of the isolates according to the presence of the virulence factors and the beta-lactam resistance profile (Table-4) showed that 56.30% of the broad-spectrum beta-lactamases profile was associated with the presence of five virulence genes *iroN*, *ompT*, *iss*, *hlyF*, and *sitA* and that the majority of ESBLs (46.2%) carried the *ompT* and *hlyF* genes and *frz*<sub>orf4</sub> fragment.

The analysis of genetic profiles by PFGE showed the presence of five different genetic profiles, which reveals a diversity of the 43 avian *E. coli* analyzed (Figure-2). MCA analysis has shown that virulence determinants seem to have a phenotypical relationship with antibiotics resistance such revealed by MCA analysis (Figure-3).

Discussion

Our results showed that *E. coli* strains studied are diverse with different pathogenicity patterns and
<table><caption>**Table-4:** Virulence profile associated with beta-lactam resistance mechanism.</caption><thead><tr><th>Mechanism virulence profile</th><th>BLSE (n=13)</th><th>Broad-spectrum<br>beta-lactamase (n=16)</th><th>Cephalosporinase (n=1)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>iroN ompT iss hlyF iutA sitA</td><td>1 (7.7%)<br>p1.509×10<sup>-5</sup>***</td><td>2 (12.4%)<br>p3.612×10<sup>-6</sup>***</td><td>1 (100%)</td></tr><tr><td>iroN ompT iss hlyF sitA</td><td>1 (7.7%)<br>p1.509×10<sup>-5</sup>***</td><td>9 (56.3%)<br>p0.0103**</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>ompT hlyF frz<sub>orf4</sub></td><td>6 (46.2%)<br>p0.007982***</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>papC felA</td><td>-</td><td>1 (6.25%)<br>p7.07×10<sup>-7</sup>***</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>sitA</td><td>-</td><td>1 (6.25%)<br>p7.07×10<sup>-7</sup>***</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>None factor</td><td>5 (38.4%)<br>p0.002935**</td><td>3 (18.8%)<br>p1.566×10<sup>-5</sup>***</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>

***Very highly significant value; **highly significant value

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure-2:** Molecular characterization and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of *Escherichia coli* isolates.</figcaption></figure>

some of them are considered as potentially highly virulent since they harbored four or five virulence genes [10,19]. However, certain strains isolated of lesions may not be pathogenic since none virulence factor has been detected with Johnson *et al.* [10] and Schouler *et al.* [11] APEC criteria.

APEC strains can be genetically very diverse and have a distinct repertoire of virulence genes [4]. It appears from the literature that virulence factors are not all present in the same isolate and there is not a single or a set of specific virulence genes systematically associated with APECs, hence, the difficulty diagnosis and implementation of treatment targeting all isolates [10,20]. Moreover, many authors report genetically diverse populations of *E. coli* in field cases of colibacillosis [21-24] and overall in APEC [25]. Furthermore, according to Collingwood *et al.* [26], colibacillosis in birds can result from infection with

isolates of a pathotype other than APEC. Besides, most of the disease associated with *E. coli* in domestic poultry is as much a consequence of increased host susceptibility due to stress, immune suppression, coinfection, or poor welfare. This leads to more “opportunistic” infections rather than the result of infection with a specific pathotype.

In Algeria, the prevalence of virulence-associated factors still poorly is known. Among these rare studies, Lounis *et al.* [27] have reported, in opposition to our results, that the most prevalent genes in APEC were *iutA* (90.6%) followed by *ompT* (86.9%) and *iss* (85.8%). While Laarem *et al.* [28] detected the presence of 4 isolates (13.8%) of avian *E. coli* carried one of Shiga toxin *E. coli*-associated genes *stx1*, *stx2*, and *ehxA* alleles. Likewise, in a recent study in Algeria [29], a set of plasmidic virulence genes (*iutA*, *fyuA*, *irp2*, *iroN*, *fimH*, *cvaC*, *traT*, *iss*, *sitA*, *ompT*,
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure-3:** Graphical representation of the multiple correspondence analysis performed by the R software. Blue: Isolates; red: Virulence factors and antibiotics. The statistical data analysis by MCA has globally established a relationship between antibiotics resistance and virulence factors present in tested strains. The results of the ACM showed the first and second plans, respectively, expressing 29.45% and 18.77% of the total variability. The information contained on these plans is considered sufficient with 52.4% inertia value.</figcaption></figure>

hlyF, cvaA, etsA, etsB, eitA, and tsh) and chromosomal virulence genes (sitA fyuA, vat, and ibeA) associated with APEC have been detected, paradoxically, in fecal E. coli strains isolated from clinically healthy chickens.

An Egyptian studies have shown that among 91 non-repetitive *E. coli* isolates, 73 (80.2%) carried three or more of the APEC virulence genes *iroN*, *ompT*, *iss*, *iutA*, and *hlyF* [30] and according to Mohamed *et al.* [31], *iss* gene was found in 72.2% of the examined extraintestinal pathogenic *E. coli* (ExPEC) strains from diseased broiler chickens. More than 90% of the total APEC examined possessed *iroN*, *ompT*, *hlyF*, *iss*, and *iutA*, and 53.5% harbored plasmid pathogenicity islands. In Iran, eight different combination patterns of the virulence genes were detected among colibacillosis isolates [32]. In Zabol, as a border region of this country, 86.9% of isolates collected from chickens with colibacillosis were positive for *iss* gene [33]. For Paixão *et al.* [34], the iron uptake-related genes and the serum survival gene were more prevalent among APEC.

Despite the diversity of virulence gene profiles (*iroN*, *ompT*, *hlyF*, *iss*, and *iutA* and others) observed in suspected isolates of colibacillosis in South Africa [35], this study revealed, in agreement with our findings, that the *iutA* gene was not systematically present in the various samples.

It should be noted that *papC*, *felA* (2.3%), and *aec26* genes are rarely found or inexistent in our strains set. Cunha *et al.* [36] also yielded a low prevalence of some genes that are frequently described in

APEC, such as *iss* (37%), *ompT*, and *hlyF* (8% each). Consequently, the occurrence and frequency of these markers may vary according to the geographic origin and year of the isolation.

Moreover, this study does not exclude that the strains without virulence factor could have both variants of these genes [37] or an arsenal of virulence factors not detected which would be responsible for colibacillosis lesions. Further investigation should be undertaken for confirmation. It should be noted that these non APEC strain are resistant to at least one antibiotic and several are multidrug-resistant. Indeed, according to Moreno *et al.* [38] and Maciel *et al.* [39], commensal *E. coli* can also generate extra intestinal lesions influenced by antimicrobial resistance. On the other hand, these APEC characterization tests seem limited according to Dziva *et al.* [40] since far too often, avian isolates are considered as APEC according to exclusively on their PCR-detected genotypic profile. However, this is a misleading strategy since avian isolates should only be characterized as APEC if their virulence has been confirmed in animal models validated for avian colibacillosis [4].

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed to characterize phenotypic features of isolates. Through the years, increased use of antibiotics has been observed in diverse activities in our country, including growth promote (although regulated since 2006), preventive, or treatment care. This extensive and uncontrolled use of antibiotics, combined with easiness of access, mostly for veterinary practice, led to the development of antibiotic resistance.
A high percentage of multidrug-resistant *E. coli* was detected in this study. It is known that *E. coli* strains isolated from poultry frequently show multi-resistance to more than one antimicrobial drug [41] which represents a global concern.

In Algeria, antibiotic resistance has been further studied than virulence contents of APEC. The most recent reports have shown that *E. coli* isolates in poultry products harbor high levels of resistance to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole (96.6%), ciprofloxacin (72%), and amoxicillin (65.5%) [28]. Halfaoui et al. [42] have isolated pathogenic *E. coli* strains from broiler chicken with colibacillosis in the central of Algeria that presented a high level of resistance to tetracycline (94.12%), flumequine (91.5%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (88.89%), enrofloxacin (86.27%), nalidixic acid (85.62%), ampicillin (83.01%), and doxycycline (75.81%).

Another result from APEC [28] also showed that the highest rates of resistance were against tetracycline (97.4%). High levels of resistance were again observed in the same study for sulfisoxazole (94.9%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (92.3%), ampicillin (89.7%), and ofloxacin (84.6%). Colistin (2.8%) and gentamicin (35.9%) seemed to be among the most efficient antibiotics against APEC isolates. The moderate resistance of gentamicin may be due to its illicit use knowing that this antibiotic is prohibited in veterinary medicine in Algeria. While, it was observed an emergence of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance in *E. coli* isolates from poultry in Algeria [43]. Curiously, none ESBL was revealed in these studies while these enzymes, especially CTX-M-1 type, were previously detected since 2015 [44].

Similar to our findings in Morocco [45] and Central Ethiopia [46], extremely high levels of resistance to amoxicillin (90.9% and 100%, respectively) and trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (82.2%) were recorded and low frequencies of resistances were noted for gentamicin (24.8%) and colistin (2%) [45], similarly, at Italian findings of Sgariglia et al. [25]. Only these past 2 years, several other publications across the globe have signalized rising levels of antibiotic resistance in APEC isolated from colibacillosis such as Nepal [47] and Senegal [48].

Our results have shown that virulence determinants seem to have a relationship with antibiotics resistance at least in its phenotypic aspect. According to Da Silva and Mendonça [49], the topic on the link on resistance/virulence is complex, considering the diversity of antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, bacterial species, and hosts. Most reports on his topic correlate the epidemiology of specific resistance genes with virulence genetic traits. This is a first step toward understanding whether there is a connection between resistance and virulence [6]. It is conceivable that virulence genetic determinants, if located on the same genetic platform as antimicrobial resistance genes (plasmids, transposons, and integrons),

may be comobilized under antimicrobial selective pressure [49] and that both clones and plasmid may be involved on the dissemination of multiresistant *E. coli* [48]. Therefore, although antibiotic resistance is not in itself a virulence factor, in certain situations, it is a key factor in the development of infection, and it may be considered a virulence like factor in specific ecological niches which antibiotic-resistant bacteria are able to colonize [50].

## Conclusion

Our current study characterized the genetic contents of virulence and antimicrobial resistance in the *E. coli* strains isolated from broilers colibacillosis lesions in central of Algeria. Indeed, concerning APEC virulence characterization, this study remains a contribution and not definitive data for many other Algerian regions and does not represent the virulence gene content in the whole country.

However, the high frequency of antimicrobial resistance, associated with several virulence factors, in particular, the presence of ESBLs strains harboring until six virulence factors in these APEC strains, represents a potential public health problem that requires to maintain constant vigilance guidelines and regulations.

## Authors' Contributions

NM designed and performed the study and wrote the manuscript. NC, AT, CAA, and SB managed the analyses of the study and were involved in data analysis. CS direct and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by Mouloud Mammeri University and ISP, INRA, Université de Tours. The authors did not receive any funding for this study.

## Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Publisher's Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

## References

1. Kaci, A. (2015) La filière avicole algérienne à l'ère de la libéralisation économique. *Cah. Agric.*, 24(3): 151-160.

2. Dho-Moulin, M. and Fairbrother, J.M. (1999) Avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (APEC). *Vet. Res.*, 30(2-3): 299-316.

3. Clermont, O., Olier, M., Hoede, C., Diancourt, L., Brisse, S., Keroudean, M., Glodt J, Picard, B., Oswald, E. and Denamur, E. (2011) Animal and human pathogenic *Escherichia coli* strains share common genetic backgrounds. *Infect. Genet. Evol.*, 11(3): 654-662.

4. Mellata, M. (2013) Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic *Escherichia coli*: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. *Foodborne Pathog. Dis.*, 10(11): 916-932.
5. Harada, K. and Asai, T. (2010) Role of antimicrobial selec- tive pressure and secondary factors on antimicrobial resis- tance prevalence in *Escherichia coli* from food-producing animals in Japan. *J. Biomed. Biotechnol.*, 2010(June 2): 180682.

6. Pitout, J.D. (2012) Extraintestinal pathogenic *Escherichia coli*: A combination of virulence with antibiotic resistance. *Front. Microbiol.*, 3 (Jan 19): 9.

7. Pitout J.D. (2013) *Enterobacteriaceae* that produce extend-ed-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpC beta-lactamases in the community: The tip of the iceberg? *Curr. Pharm. Des.*, 19(2): 257-263.

8. Bej, A.K., Steffan, R.J., DiCesare, J., Haff, L. and Atlas, R.M. (1990) Detection of coliform bacteria in water by polymerase chain reaction and gene probes. *Appl. Environ. Microbiol.*, 56(2): 307-314.

9. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

10. Johnson, T.J., Wannemuehler, Y., Doetkott, C., Johnson, S.J., Rosenberger, S.C. and Nolan, L.K. (2008) Identification of minimal predictors of avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* vir-ulence for use as a rapid diagnostic tool. *J. Clin. Microbiol.*, 46(12): 3987-3996.

11. Schouler, C., Schaeffer, B., Brée, A., Mora, A., Dahbi, G., Biet, F., Oswald, E., Mainil, J., Blanco, J. and Moulin-Schouleur, M. (2012) Diagnostic strategy for identifying avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* based on four patterns of virulence genes. *J. Clin. Microbiol.*, 50(5): 1673-1678.

12. Dho, M. and Lafont, J.P. (1982) *Escherichia coli* colonization of the trachea in poultry: Comparison of virulent and avirulent strains in gnotoxenic chickens. *Avian Dis.*, 26(4): 787-797.

13. Schouler, C., Koffmann, F., Amory, C., Leroy-Sétrin, S. and Moulin-Schouleur, M. (2004) Genomic subtraction for the identification of putative new virulence factors of an avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* strain of O₂ serogroup. *Microbiology*, 150(Pt 9): 2973-2984.

14. CA-SFM. (2015) Comité de l'antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie Recommandations. CA-SFM, Paris, France.

15. Moulin-Schouleur, M., Schouler, C., Tailliez, P., Kao, M.R., Brée, A., Germon, P., Oswald, E., Mainil, J., Blanco, M. and Blanco, J. (2006) Common virulence factors and genetic relationships between O18:K1: H7 *Escherichia coli* isolates of human and avian origin. *J. Clin. Microbiol.*, 44(10): 3484-3482.

16. Nolan, L.K., Wooley, R.E., Brown, J., Spears, K.R., Dickerson, H.W. and Dekich, M. (1992) Comparison of a complement resistance test, a chicken embryo lethality test, and the chicken lethality test for determining virulence of avian *Escherichia coli*. *Avian Dis.*, 36(2): 395-397.

17. Trotereau, A. and Schouler, C. (2019) Use of a chicken embryo lethality assay to assess the efficacy of phage therapy. *Methods Mol. Biol.*, 1898(4): 199-205.

18. Livermore, D.M., Winstanley, T.G. and Shannon, K.P. (2001) Interpretative reading: Recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes. *J. Antimicrob. Chemother.*, 48(Suppl 1): 87-102.

19. Vounba, P., Kane, Y., Ndiaye, C., Arsenault, J., Fairbrother, J.M. and Alambédji, R.B. (2018) Foodborne molecular characterization of *Escherichia coli* isolated from chickens with colibacillosis in senegal. *Pathog. Dis.*, 15(8): 517-525.

20. Guabiraba, R. and Schouler, C. (2015) Avian colibacillosis: Still many black holes. *FEMS Microbiol. Lett.*, 362(15): fnv118.

21. La Ragione, R.M. and Woodward, M.J. (2002) Virulence factors of *Escherichia coli* serotypes associated with avian colisepticaemia. *Res. Vet. Sci.*, 73(1): 27-35.

22. Ewers, C., Janssen, T. and Wieler, L.H. (2003) Avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (APEC). *Berl. Münch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr.*, 116(9-10): 381-395.

23. Rodriguez-Siek, K.E., Giddings, C.W., Doetkott, C., Johnson, T.J., Fakhr, M.K. and Nolan, L.K. (2005)

Comparison of *Escherichia coli* isolates implicated in human urinary tract infection and avian colibacillosis. *Microbiology*, 151(Pt 6): 2097-2110.

24. Stacy, A.K., Mitchell, N.M., Maddux, J.T., De la Cruz, M.A., Durán, L., Girón, J.A., Curtiss, R. and Mellata, M. (2014) Evaluation of the prevalence and production of *Escherichia coli* common pilus among avian pathogenic *E. coli* and its role in virulence. *PLoS One*, 9(1): e86565.

25. Sgariglia, E., Mandolini, N.A., Napoleoni, M., Medici, L., Fraticelli, R., Conquista M., Gianfelici, P., Staffolani, M., Fisichella, S., Capuccella, M., Sargenti, M. and Perugini, G. (2019) Antibiotic resistance pattern and virulence genes in avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (APEC) from different breeding systems. *Vet. Ital.*, 55(1): 26-33.

26. Collingwood, C., Kemmett, K., Williams, N. and Wigley, P. (2014) Is the concept of avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* as a single pathotype fundamentally flawed? *Front. Vet. Sci.*, 1 (Oct 26): 5.

27. Lounis, M., Ge, Z., Yuehua, L., Gao, Y., Kaidi, R., Oumouna, M., Wang, J. and Oumouna, K. (2018) Virulence traits of avian pathogenic (APEC) and fecal (AFEC) *E. coli* isolated from broiler chickens in Algeria. *Trop. Anim. Health Prod.*, 50(3): 547-553.

28. Laarem, M., Barguigua, A., Nayme, K., Akila, A., Zerouali, K., El Mdaghri, N. and Timinouni, M. (2017) Occurrence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and virulence genes in avian *Escherichia coli* isolates from Algeria. *J. Infect. Dev. Ctries*, 11(2): 143-151.

29. Messaili, C., Messai, Y. and Bakour, R. (2019) Virulence gene profiles, antimicrobial resistance and phylogenetic groups of fecal *Escherichia coli* strains isolated from broiler chickens in Algeria. *Vet. Ital.*, 55(1): 35-46.

30. Ahmed, A.M., Shimamoto, T. and Shimamoto, T. (2013) Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* isolated from septicemic broilers. *Int. J. Med. Microbiol.*, 303(8): 475-483.

31. Mohamed, M.A., Shehata, M.A. and Rafeek, E. (2014) Virulence genes content and antimicrobial resistance in *Escherichia coli* from broiler chickens. *Vet. Med. Int.*, 2014(Nov 24): Article ID 195189.

32. Asadi, A., Saleh, T.Z., Jamshidian, M. and Ghanbarpour, R. (2018) ECOR phylotyping and determination of virulence genes in *Escherichia coli* isolates from pathological conditions of broiler chickens in poultry slaughter-houses of Southeast of Iran. *Vet. Res. Forum.*, 9(3): 211-216.

33. Bonjar, M.S.S., Salari, S., Jahantigh, M. and Rashki, A. (2017) Frequency of *iss* and *irp2* genes by PCR method in *Escherichia coli* isolated from poultry with colibacillosis in comparison with healthy chicken in poultry farms of Zabol, South East of Iran. *Pol. J. Vet. Sci.*, 20(2): 363-367.

34. Paixão, A.C., Ferreira, A.C., Fontes, M., Themudo, P., Albuquerque, T., Soares, M.C., Fevereiro, M., Martins, L. and Corrêa, de Sá, M.I. (2016) Detection of virulence-associated genes in pathogenic and commensal avian *Escherichia coli* isolates. *Poult. Sci.*, 95(7): 1646-1652.

35. Van der Westhuizen, W.A. and Bragg, R.R. (2012) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for screening avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* for virulence genes. *Avian Pathol.*, 41(1): 33-40.

36. Cunha, M.P.V., Saidenberg, A.B., Moreno, A.M., Ferreira, A.J.P., Vieira, M.A.M., Gomes, T.A.T. and Knöbl, T. (2017) Pandemic extra-intestinal pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (ExPEC) clonal group O6-B2-ST73 as a cause of avian colibacillosis in Brazil. *PLoS One*, 12(6): e0178970.

37. Delicato, E.R., de Brito, B.G., Gaziri, L.C. and Vidotto, M.C. (2003) Virulence-associated genes in *Escherichia coli* isolates from poultry with colibacillosis. *Vet. Microbiol.*, 94(2): 97-103.

38. Moreno, E., Prats, G., Planells, I., Planes, A.M., Pérez, T. and Andreu, A. (2006) Characterization of *Escherichia coli* isolates derived from phylogenetic groups A and B1 causing extraintestinal infection. *Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin.,
24(8): 483-489.

39. Maciel, J.F., Matter, L.B., Trindade, M.M., Camillo, G., Lovato, M., de Ávila Botton, S. and Castagna de Vargas, A. (2017) Virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of extraintestinal *Escherichia coli* isolated from an avian colisepticemia outbreak. *Microb. Pathog.*, 103 (Dec21): 119-122.

40. Dziva, F. and Stevens, M.P. (2008) Colibacillosis in poultry: Unravelling the molecular basis of virulence of avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* in their natural hosts. *Avian Pathol.*, 37(4): 355-366.

41. Nhung, N.T., Chansiripornchai, N. and Carrique-Mas, J.J. (2017) Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: A review. *Front. Vet. Sci.*, 4(Aug 10): 126.

42. Halfaoui, Z., Menoueri, N.M. and Bendali, L.M. (2017) Serogrouping and antibiotic resistance of *Escherichia coli* isolated from broiler chicken with colibacillosis in center of Algeria. *Vet. World*, 10(7): 830-835.

43. Chabou, S., Leulmi, H. and Rolain, J.M. (2018) Emergence of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry in Algeria. *J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.*, 16(Mar): 115-116.

44. Meguenni, N., Le Devendec, L., Jouy, E., Le Corvec, M., Bounar-Kechih, S., Bakour R. and Kempf, I. (2015) First description of an extended-spectrum cephalosporin- and fluoroquinolone resistant avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli*

clone in Algeria. *Avian Dis.*, 59(1): 20-23.

45. Rahmatallah, N., Nassik, S., El Rhaffouli, H., Amine, I.L. and El Houadfi, M. (2017) Détection de souches multi-résistantes d'Escherichia coli d'origine aviaire dans la région de Rabat-Salé-Zemmour-Zaer. *Rev. Mar. Sci. Agron. Vét.*, 5(2): 96-102.

46. Sarba, E.J., Kelbesa, K.A., Bayu, M.D., Gebremedhin, E.Z., Borena, B.M. and Teshale, A. (2019) Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of *Escherichia coli* isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia. *BMC Vet. Res.*, 15(1): 85.

47. Subedi, M., Luitel, H., Devkota, B., Bhattarai, R.K., Phuyal, S., Panthi, P., Shrestha, A and Chaudhary, D.K. (2018) Antibiotic resistance pattern and virulence genes content in avian pathogenic *Escherichia coli* (APEC) from broiler chickens in Chitwan, Nepal. *BMC Vet. Res.*, 14(1): 113.

48. Vounba, P., Arsenault, J., Bada-Alambédji, R. and Fairbrother, J.M. (2019) Pathogenic potential and the role of clones and plasmids in beta-lactamase-producing *E. coli* from chicken faeces in Vietnam. *BMC Vet. Res.*, 15(1): 106.

49. Da Silva, G.J. and Mendonça, N. (2012) Association between antimicrobial resistance and virulence in *Escherichia coli*. *Virulence*, 3(1): 18-28.

50. Beceiro, A., Tomás, M. and Bou, G. (2013) Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: A successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world? *Clin. Microbiol. Rev.*, 26(2): 185-230.

********