# Mediation models of anxiety and depression between temperament and drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa

Allan Jérolon, Vittorio Perduca, Nadia Delsedime, Giovanni Abbate-Daga, Enrica Marzola

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Allan Jérolon, Vittorio Perduca, Nadia Delsedime, Giovanni Abbate-Daga, Enrica Marzola. Mediation models of anxiety and depression between temperament and drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 2022, 27, pp.2569 - 2581. 10.1007/s40519-022-01397-4. hal-03915482

HAL Id: hal-03915482

https://hal.science/hal-03915482v1

Submitted on 25 Sep 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Mediation models of anxiety and depression between temperament and drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa

Allan Jéronon<fnref n="1" /> · Vittorio Perduca<fnref n="1" /> ID · Nadia Delsedime<fnref n="2" /> · Giovanni Abbate-Daga<fnref n="2" /> ID · Enrica Marzola<fnref n="2" /> ID

Received: 25 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published online: 23 April 2022

© The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022

## Abstract

**Purpose** Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a life-threatening condition in which temperament, anxiety, depression, and core AN body-related psychopathology (drive for thinness, DT, and body dissatisfaction, BD) are intertwined. This relationship has not been to date disentangled; therefore, we performed a multiple mediation analysis aiming to quantify the effect of each component.

**Methods** An innovative multiple mediation statistical method has been applied to data from 184 inpatients with AN completing: Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire, Eating Disorders Inventory-2, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory.

**Results** All affective temperaments but the hyperthymic one were involved in the relationship with DT and BD. Only the anxious temperament had a significant unmediated direct effect on DT after the strictest correction for multiple comparisons, while the depressive temperament had a significant direct effect on DT at a less strict significance level. State anxiety was the strongest mediator of the link between affective temperament and core AN body-related psychopathology. Depression showed intermediate results while trait anxiety was not a significant mediator at all.

**Conclusion** Affective temperaments had a relevant impact on body-related core components of AN; however, a clear direct effect could be identified only for the anxious and depressive temperaments. Also, state anxiety was the strongest mediator thus entailing interesting implications in clinical practice.

**Level of evidence** V, cross-sectional study.

**Keywords** Eating disorders · Eating psychopathology · Personality · Comorbidity · Body image

## Introduction

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe mental disorder characterized by abnormal patterns of eating behaviors leading to life-threatening emaciation, several organic and psychological sequelae, and high mortality [1]. It is a mental disorder of unknown etiology with typical onset in female adolescents and with a lifetime prevalence in women of up to 2–4% [2, 3]. AN sufferers exhibit an egosyntonic resistance to eating leading to significantly low body weight, intense fear of gaining weight, body image distortions, and severe weight loss due to a relentless pursuit of thinness and restrictive eating [4]. Patients with restricting AN (R-AN) lose weight by dieting and exercising while those with binge-purging AN (BP-AN) also engage in binge eating and/or purging behaviors [4]. The majority of patients (50–70%) improve or recover, 20% of cases develop a protracted course of illness, and 5–10% die [1].

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Enrica Marzola
enrica.marzola@unito.it

Allan Jéronon
allan.jerolon@parisdescartes.fr

Vittorio Perduca
vittorio.perduca@parisdescartes.fr

Nadia Delsedime
nadia.delsedime@unito.it

Giovanni Abbate-Daga
giovanni.abbatedaga@unito.it

<footnote n="1">1 CNRS, MAP5 UMR 8145, Université de Paris,
F-75006 Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">2 Eating Disorders Center, Department of Neuroscience,
Rita Levi Montalcini", Hospital "Città della Salute e Della
Scienza", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin,
Italy</footnote>
Psychiatric comorbidity is a key-element as a pathogonic and maintaining factor in AN, also given its impact on body image concerns [5]. Recent studies on patients with AN reported comorbidity rates of 40% for depression and up to 80% for anxiety disorders, with 20–30% for generalized anxiety disorder, and > 50% for social anxiety disorder [6, 7]. Interestingly, data support also the other way round, since patients with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders are diagnosed more often with a lifetime eating disorder when compared to people without affective or anxiety disorders [8] thus supporting a shared genetic and environmental vulnerability [9, 10]. However, the debate is open on the time-relationship between anxious and depressive symptoms and AN onset and on their role as maintaining factors for AN. For example, the literature supports the onset of anxiety disorders as preceding AN [11–14] with heightened anxiety persisting after recovery from AN [15, 16]. Therefore, these data suggest an underlying anxious trait partially independent of nutrition. Also depression is known to be a key element in AN [17, 18] and, similarly to what happens with anxiety, the onset of depression can precede AN [12, 19] but the time-relationship with AN (e.g., predisposing factor versus consequence of AN-related severe malnutrition) is currently debated [20]. Importantly, anxious comorbidity negatively impacts on AN prognosis [21, 22] and patients with AN and depression tend to be unresponsive to antidepressants [23], to gain less weight in treatment [24, 25] and to report a mood relapse after recovery from the eating disorder [23]. In this vein, a network analysis approach can be of help in overcoming the categorical classification and conceptualization of psychiatric disorders. Using such analyses, anxiety and depression are the nodes with the highest centrality in the constellation of AN-related symptoms [17, 18].

Moreover, research consistently supported the role of temperament as a vulnerability and maintaining factor [26–29] as well as an outcome predictor for AN [30]. Interestingly, these traits – including anxiety and negative emotionality often predate the onset of AN and persist to some extent also after recovery [26, 31–34]. Affective temperaments have been applied to the field of AN [35–37] because helpful in bridging the gap between personality and comorbidity profile in AN. In fact, affective temperaments can be defined as one’s own constitutional, genetically-based, and biologically-determined emotional reactivity to the environmental stimuli that is stable over time [38]. Akiskal and coworkers [39], in the wake of following Kraepelin seminal work on “fundamental states” and Kretschmer’s conceptualization of personality, conceptualized an array of affective conditions (depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable, and anxious) which represent a gradient of psychopathological nuances ranging from physiological to clinical conditions. Earlier data from our group provided support to the

relevance of the anxious and depressive temperaments in increasing the likelihood of full-blown anxious and depressive comorbidities in patients with AN [36] and specific AN psychopathology, even after controlling for current anxiety and depressive symptoms [37]. These findings mirror those from other fields of psychiatry, including panic disorder [40], bipolar disorders [41], and suicide [42].

However, currently little is known about the role of temperament as compared to that of anxiety and depressive symptoms on core aspects of AN psychopathology (i.e., drive for thinness [DT] and body dissatisfaction [BD]). As stated earlier, it is well-established that anxiety and depression are interwoven with AN [17, 18] but the quantification of their role is to date missing. Statistical mediation analysis, whose goal is to decompose the causal effect a variable has on an outcome into the sum of indirect effects through intermediate variables referred to as mediators and a direct effect, could address well this research question. To date, literature on anxiety and depression as mediators of eating core aspects in AN is in its infancy. In fact, the available studies suggest anxiety as a mediator of the association between appearance-related stress and eating disorder behaviors [43] and between emotional dysregulation and drive for thinness [44]. Still, depression was reported to be a mediator between clinical variables and alexithymia [45]. Importantly, research needs to deepen the potential role of emaciation and age as confounders in this context. In fact, it is well-known that patients’ emaciation can sometimes exaggerate certain patients’ premorbid characteristics as well as their dysphoric state [28]. Less is known on the potential role of age on temperament. However, it should be borne in mind that a study found age as impacting on the cyclothymic temperament [46].

Given the current gaps in literature, with this study, we aimed to investigate in inpatients with severe AN, using an innovative statistical method able to handle multiple and potentially correlated mediators, a mediation models including affective temperaments as predictors, symptoms of anxiety and depression as mediators, and core AN body-related psychopathology (namely DT and BD) as outcomes. DT describes patients’ extreme fear of gaining weight and desire to be thinner while BD indicates the negative subjective evaluation of one’s own body (e.g., stomach, thighs). Given their crucial role in AN psychopathology, both factors represent maintaining factors of AN [47, 48]. With more detail, we hypothesized that marked traits of depressive, cyclothymic, irritable and anxious temperaments would entail greater anxiety and depressive symptoms and more marked DT and BD. The hyperthymic temperament instead would entail a protective effect. Also, we expected to find a positive association between BMI and all variables (i.e., the greater the BMI the greater the depressive symptoms) as reported in literature [49]. It is also noted that as BMI

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
decreases in AN, body dissatisfaction values decrease as measured by the Body Shape Questionnaire and Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire [50]. The hypothesis on age was more exploratory but we expected to find a positive association instead (i.e., the greater the age the more marked the other variables). That said, our overarching goal is to shed light on the “quantity” of effect directly underpinning the association between temperament and core aspects of AN versus the extent to which such an association “goes through” patients’ anxiety and depression levels. We expected to find both anxiety and depression symptoms as significant mediators of the relationship between affective temperaments and core AN psychopathology.

# Methods

## Participants

The initial sample was composed of 209 female inpatients consecutively hospitalized at the ward of the Eating Disorders Center of the “Città della Salute e della Scienza” hospital of the University of Turin, Italy. All patients were admitted voluntarily. However, nine patients were excluded from this study because of not meeting the inclusion criteria, 4 candidates failed to provide valid written informed consent, and 12 individuals returned an incomplete assessment. Therefore, we finally enrolled 184 participants with AN.

Upon admission, experienced psychiatrists collected socio-demographical and clinical information, and a trained nurse measured patients’ weight and height to calculate body mass index (BMI). Inclusion criteria for this study were the following: (a) full diagnosis of AN as evaluated by an experienced psychiatrist with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 [51] upon admission; (b) female gender; (c) no substance dependence; (d) no psychotic-spectrum disorders; (e) no organic comorbidities (e.g., epilepsy).

The Ethical Committee of the Department of Neuroscience of the University of Turin, Italy, approved this study and all patients provided their written informed consent.

## Measures

All participants completed the following assessments within the first week of the hospital stay:

- Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A). In this study, we used the validated Italian version of the TEMPS-A [52]. The TEMPS-Autoquestionnaire is a 110-item (109-item for men) self-administered, Yes-or-No type questionnaire that allows measuring affective temperamental traits. It assesses depressive (items 1–22), cyclothymic

(items 23–42), hyperthymic (items 43–63), irritable (items 64–84), and anxious (item 85–110) temperaments. Cronbach’s alpha of the sample 0.94.

- Eating Disorders Inventory-2 (EDI-2). The Italian version of the EDI-2 [53] is a psychometrically robust (Cronbach’s alpha of the sample 0.97) self-report measure of disordered eating attitudes, behaviors, and personality traits common to individuals who are diagnosed with an eating disorder. Eleven subscales evaluate the symptoms and psychological correlates of eating disorders; high scores reflect more severe pathology.

- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The Italian version of the STAI [54] is a widely used, validated psychometric instrument, that allows distinguishing between two different dimensions of anxiety: the state anxiety (S-anxiety), a transitory state, and trait anxiety (T-anxiety), a stable individual disposition. These two types of anxiety are measured by two different, 20-items, self-report scales. For each item, the severity of anxious symptoms is rated from 1 (not at all/almost never) to 4 (very much so/almost always) and a global score from 20 to 80 is assessed. Cronbach’s alpha of the sample 0.97.

- Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI [55] is a well-validated instrument used to assess depressive symptomatology severity (Cronbach’s alpha of the sample 0.95). It is composed of 13-items, defining a scale ranging from minimal (scores from 0 to 4) depressive symptoms to severe depression (scores from 16 to 39). Mild (scores from 5 to 7) and moderate (scores from 8 to 15) scores are also available.

## Statistical analysis

Causal mediation analysis comprises statistical methods to decompose the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome into indirect effects through measured intermediate variables called mediators, and a direct effect, while adjusting for confounders [56]. In this context, direct effect comprises both the true causal effect of the exposure on the outcome that is not mediated by any intermediate variables and, possibly, the effect that goes through mediators that are not measured. In this work we adopted the counterfactual framework for mediation analysis. According to this framework, the direct, indirect and total effects are defined as statistical parameters independently from a predefined model and are expressed as differences of expected counterfactual outcomes. As such, these effects are measured in the scale of the outcome. The starting point of any mediation analysis is the assumption of a causal model for the data generation process in the form of a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG), a diagram where the nodes correspond to the variables of interest and the directed edges represent potential direct causal effects. Such DAGs generally reflect the current knowledge about
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) showing the causal assumption between the variables of interest</figcaption></figure>

the phenomenon under investigation. Once a DAG is built and it verifies identification conditions generally known as sequential ignorability, mediation analysis tools estimate direct and indirect effects from the data. In this work, we applied a recently published method that makes it possible to deal with multiple mediators showing residual correlation after adjustment for confounders [57]. This method applies a quasi-Bayesian algorithm to estimate the total causal effect, the direct effect, the joint indirect effect of all mediators and the mediator specific indirect effects from the linear model of the outcome given the exposure, the mediators and the observed confounders and the linear models of the mediators given the exposure and the observed confounders.

In this work, the exposures of interest are affective tem-
peraments (depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable,
or anxious), the potential mediators are state and trait anxi-
ety (as measured by the S-STAI and the T-STAI, respec-
tively) and depressive symptoms (as measured by the BDI),
and the outcomes are key aspects of AN psychopathology
(as measured by DT and BD on the EDI-2). For each affec-
tive temperament-eating psychopathology pair we assume
the DAG depicted in Fig. 1 and realize a separate mediation
analysis. For each of these 10 analyses, we started by fitting
(1) the linear model of the eating disorder under considera-
tion given the three potential mediators and the temperament
and (2) the linear models of the three potential mediators
given the temperament. These models were adjusted for
age and BMI. We then applied the R package multimedi-
ate<fnref n="1" /> to these two models to estimate the effects of interests
together with confidence intervals and p-values. Roughly
speaking, causal effect estimates represent the average
change of the considered outcome in response to a change
of one unit of the temperament while holding constant the

mediators (direct effect), of the mediators while holding
fixed the temperament (indirect effects). For more precise
definitions of the natural direct and indirect effects adopted
in this work we refer to [54]. In each mediation analysis, to
control the family-wise error rate at the nominal 0.05 value,
we adopted the threshold 0.05/6 = 0.0083 for significance
calling (intermediate local threshold). Moreover, to control
the family-wise error rate in the totality of performed tests,
we also considered the threshold 0.05/60 = 0.00083 (global
threshold). All analyses were done in R.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the sample

Out of the whole sample (n = 184), 129 patients (70.1%) were diagnosed with the R-AN and 55 (29.9%) with the BP-AN subtype of AN. Patients were all Caucasian and their mean age was 23.7 ± 8.7 years, mean admission BMI was 14.4 ± 1.8, and mean duration of illness was 6 ± 7.8 years. Sixty patients (39.2%) reported previous AN-related hospitalizations and 102 (66.7%) were on medications upon admission. Concerning comorbidity, 61 patients (40.1%) had a comorbid psychiatric disorder (i.e., a formal diagnosis of major depression or anxiety disorders). Supplementary Table 1 shows further summary statistics about the variables depicted in Fig. 1.

Mediation analysis of anxiety and depression

Supplementary Table 2 shows the estimates of the coeffi-
cients in all the linear models needed for the ten mediation
analyses.

As reported in Table 1 and Figs. 2, 3, all affective tem-
peraments but the hyperthymic one had a significant total
effect on DT and BD.

Concerning the direct (i.e., unmediated) effect, only two
affective temperaments, namely depressive and anxious,
showed an unmediated impact on DT, even though the direct
effect of depressive temperament on DT was no longer sig-
nificant after the most stringent correction for multiple com-
parison. The anxious and hyperthymic temperament had also
a significant direct impact on BD and DT respectively, but
this was no longer true after statistical correction for multi-
ple comparisons.

About the indirect (i.e., mediated) effect, we found a joint
(i.e., anxiety + depressive symptoms) significant effect for all
mediators and outcomes considered, even though the joint
indirect effect of depressive and hyperthymic temperaments
on BD were not significant after global multiple comparison
correction. With more detail, when analyzing the specific
contribution in the mediation model for each factor (i.e., trait

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<footnote n="1">1 https://github.com/AllanJe/multimediate.</footnote>
<table><caption>**Table 1** Mediation models of anxiety and depression between affective temperaments and eating psychopathology and Body Mass Index</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Drive for thinness§</th><th colspan="3">Body dissatisfaction§</th></tr><tr><th>Estimate</th><th>95% CI for estimate</th><th>p</th><th>Estimate</th><th>95% CI for estimate</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TEMPS-A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Depressive</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total effect</td><td>1.04</td><td>0.81, 1.26</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.68</td><td>0.45, 0.91</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average causal mediation effect</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>STAI-TRAIT</td><td>0.06</td><td>-0.14, 0.26</td><td>0.565</td><td>0.03</td><td>-0.18, 0.24</td><td>0.767</td></tr><tr><td>STAI-STATE</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.24, 0.59</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.3</td><td>0.13, 0.50</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BDI</td><td>0.16</td><td>-0.001, 0.33</td><td><strong>0.048</strong></td><td>0.21</td><td>0.03, 0.41</td><td><strong>0.019</strong></td></tr><tr><td>JOINT</td><td>0.62</td><td>0.42, 0.82</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.54</td><td>0.35, 0.76</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average direct effect</td><td>0.43</td><td>0.18, 0.69</td><td><strong>0.002b</strong></td><td>0.14</td><td>-0.13, 0.42</td><td>0.345</td></tr><tr><td>Cyclothymic</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total effect</td><td>0.66</td><td>0.46, 0.86</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.41</td><td>0.21, 0.60</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001a</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average causal mediation effect</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>STAI-TRAIT</td><td>0.08</td><td>-0.02, 0.19</td><td>0.128</td><td>0.03</td><td>-0.07, 0.14</td><td>0.533</td></tr><tr><td>STAI-STATE</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.16, 0.42</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.21</td><td>0.09, 0.35</td><td><strong>0.001a</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BDI</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.01, 0.24</td><td><strong>0.032</strong></td><td>0.14</td><td>0.03, 0.28</td><td><strong>0.018</strong></td></tr><tr><td>JOINT</td><td>0.47</td><td>0.34, 0.62</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.39</td><td>0.27, 0.52</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average direct effect</td><td>0.18</td><td>-0.01, 0.38</td><td>0.069</td><td>0.02</td><td>-0.19, 0.22</td><td>0.857</td></tr><tr><td>Hyperthymic</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total effect</td><td>-0.25</td><td>-0.47, -0.03</td><td><strong>0.024</strong></td><td>-0.19</td><td>-0.04, 0.02</td><td>0.088</td></tr><tr><td>Average causal mediation effect</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>STAI-TRAIT</td><td>-0.08</td><td>-0.18, -0.006</td><td>0.066</td><td>-0.04</td><td>-0.13, 0.06</td><td>0.433</td></tr><tr><td>STAI-STATE</td><td>-0.14</td><td>-0.26, -0.03</td><td><strong>0.012</strong></td><td>-0.1</td><td>-0.21, -0.02</td><td><strong>0.006*</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BDI</td><td>-0.11</td><td>-0.23, -0.02</td><td>0.008a</td><td>-0.12</td><td>-0.25, -0.03</td><td><strong>0.011</strong></td></tr><tr><td>JOINT</td><td>-0.33</td><td>-0.47, -0.19</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>-0.26</td><td>-0.39, -0.13</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average direct effect</td><td>0.07</td><td>-0.12, 0.26</td><td>0.454</td><td>0.07</td><td>-0.12, 0.27</td><td>0.512</td></tr><tr><td>Irritable</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total effect</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.53, 1.02</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.55</td><td>0.32, 0.79</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average causal mediation effect</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>STAI-TRAIT</td><td>0.11</td><td>-0.03, 0.26</td><td>0.126</td><td>0.04</td><td>-0.11, 0.21</td><td>0.568</td></tr><tr><td>STAI-STATE</td><td>0.37</td><td>0.21, 0.57</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.27</td><td>0.12, 0.45</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BDI</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.02, 0.32</td><td><strong>0.018</strong></td><td>0.19</td><td>0.03, 0.37</td><td><strong>0.014</strong></td></tr><tr><td>JOINT</td><td>0.65</td><td>0.47, 0.84</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.51</td><td>0.35, 0.70</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average direct effect</td><td>0.12</td><td>-0.12, 0.37</td><td>0.319</td><td>0.04</td><td>-0.21, 0.29</td><td>0.754</td></tr><tr><td>Anxious</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total effect</td><td>0.73</td><td>0.56, 0.89</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.54</td><td>0.39, 0.71</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average causal mediation effect</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>STAI-TRAIT</td><td>0.04</td><td>-0.09, 0.18</td><td>0.564</td><td>-0.006</td><td>-0.15, 0.14</td><td>0.931</td></tr><tr><td>STAI-STATE</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.17, 0.43</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.21</td><td>0.1, 0.35</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>BDI</td><td>0.12</td><td>0.01, 0.24</td><td><strong>0.035</strong></td><td>0.14</td><td>0.02, 0.26</td><td><strong>0.018</strong></td></tr><tr><td>JOINT</td><td>0.45</td><td>0.30, 0.60</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.34</td><td>0.2, 0.48</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average direct effect</td><td>0.28</td><td>0.09, 0.47</td><td><strong>&lt;8.3e-4b</strong></td><td>0.21</td><td>0.03, 0.40</td><td><strong>0.04</strong></td></tr></tbody></table>

§Model adjusted for BMI and age

ªSignificant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons to adjust for all multiple comparisons in each individual mediation analysis (intermediate significance threshold = 0.05/6 = 0.0083)

ᵇSignificant after Bonferroni correction to adjust for all multiple comparisons in the ten mediation analyses (global significance threshold = 0.05/60 = 0.00083)
<table><caption>**Fig. 2** Mediation between affective temperaments, anxiety and depression on drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction at a glance. Legend: + positive estimate (p value < 0.05); — negative estimate (p value < 0.05); n.s. non-significant; * significant after Bonferroni</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">Total effect</th><th rowspan="2">Direct effect</th><th colspan="4">Indirect effect</th></tr><tr><th>Trait anxiety</th><th>State anxiety</th><th>Depression</th><th>Joint</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><strong>Depressive</strong></td><td>Drive for thinness</td><td>+**</td><td>+*</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td>Body dissatisfaction</td><td>+*</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+*</td><td>+</td><td>+*</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><strong>Cyclothymic</strong></td><td>Drive for thinness</td><td>+**</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td>Body dissatisfaction</td><td>+*</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+*</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><strong>Hyperthymic</strong></td><td>Drive for thinness</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>n.s.</td><td>-</td><td>-*</td><td>-**</td></tr><tr><td>Body dissatisfaction</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>-*</td><td>-</td><td>-*</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><strong>Irritable</strong></td><td>Drive for thinness</td><td>+**</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td>Body dissatisfaction</td><td>+**</td><td>n.s.</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><strong>Anxious</strong></td><td>Drive for thinness</td><td>+**</td><td>+**</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr><tr><td>Body dissatisfaction</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>n.s.</td><td>+**</td><td>+</td><td>+**</td></tr></tbody></table>

correction at the intermediate threshold *p* value < 0.05/6 = 0.0083; ** significant after Bonferroni correction at global threshold *p* value < 0.05/60 = 0.00083

and state anxiety and BDI), trait anxiety did not show any significant mediation effect while state anxiety resulted as a significant mediator of DT for all affective temperaments at least at some level of statistical significance. Depressive symptoms showed statistical significance as mediators of the relationship between all affective temperaments and DT and BD before correction for multiple comparisons; only the mediation of BDI between the hyperthymic temperament and DT was significant at the intermediate significance threshold (see Table 1).

## Discussion

With this study, we aimed to investigate and quantify the entrenched relationship occurring between affective temperaments, anxiety, and depression on core aspects of AN body-related psychopathology, namely drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction. To do so, we assumed the causal models with multiple mediators depicted in Fig. 1 and applied a recently published multiple mediation statistical method

[57]. Three main findings emerged. First, all affective temperaments but the hyperthymic one were overall involved in the relationship with core aspects of AN. Second, only the anxious and, to a lesser significance level, the depressive temperaments had a significant direct—that is, unmediated by the measured mediators and thus directly influencing outcomes—on DT while only a trend towards significance was found for the relationship between anxious traits and BD. Third, concerning the mediated effect, state anxiety was the strongest mediator of the link between temperament and core AN body-related psychopathology. Depression showed intermediate results, mediating significantly (and negatively) only the relationship between hyperthymic traits and DT, and trait anxiety was not a significant mediator at all. Notably, these are novel data since represent an innovative empirical attempt not only to disentangle but also to quantify the role of anxious and depressive symptoms in the relationship between temperament and clinical characteristics of real-world patients with AN.

Altogether, these findings are in line with earlier data showing the affective temperaments as relevant in the

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>
a. Depressive drive thinness

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

d. Cyclothymic body dissatisfaction

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

b. Depressive body dissatisfaction

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

e. Hyperthymic drive for thinness

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

c. Cyclothymic drive thinness

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

f. Hyperthymic body dissatisfaction

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 3** Mediation models of anxiety and depression between affective temperaments and eating psychopathology and Body Mass Index: estimates and 95% confidence intervals for the following causal effects: A.C.M.E.: Average Causal Mediation Effect (i.e., indirect

effect) via individual mediators (STAI-TRAIT, STAI-STATE, BDI) or through all the three mediators taken jointly; A.D.E. Average Direct Effect; Total effect
<figure><img src="image_14.png" /><figcaption>h. Irritable body dissatisfaction</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>i. Anxious drive thinness</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>j. Anxious body dissatisfaction</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>Fig. 3 (continued)</figcaption></figure>

framework of AN [36, 37]; in fact, all temperaments but the hyperthymic one reported a significant total effect on core body-related aspects of AN psychopathology. It should be also borne in mind that hyperthymic traits are more typical of healthy controls and somehow under-represented in AN [36], potentially contributing to explain this finding. In line with earlier data from our group [36], the irritable and the anxious temperaments showed a similar profile but irritable traits should be further studied given their potential connection with the painful dysphoria commonly experienced by AN sufferers [28].

Nevertheless, when considering specifically the direct effect of the affective temperaments on AN core symptomatology, only the anxious and, to a lesser extent, the depressive traits showed a significant direct effect on DT, a crucial aspect of patients’ clinical presentation. Although it should

be remembered that these findings refer specifically to the presented models, thus the direct effect could be influenced by temperament via other pathways than the ones (through the mediators) included in our causal model, this represents a novel finding in the field of AN since no mediation analyses on these matters were conducted so far. Interestingly, concerning BD, the anxious temperament showed a trend towards significance while the depressive one did not reach the significance threshold. Taken together, these findings on one hand confirm the role of anxiety and depression in AN but on the other hand, provide the innovative measurement of their direct effect on AN psychopathology as well. In fact, notwithstanding the consolidated role of anxiety and depression in AN [14, 17, 18], findings from our models allow us to disentangle and quantify the role of the anxious and depressive temperament traits independently of current anxious

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>
and depressive symptoms. This was particularly true for the effect of anxious and depressive temperaments on DT while BD was found to be not directly influenced by these traits, with the anxious temperament showing only a trend towards significance not surviving statistical correction. These different mediation pathways (different direct effects on DT and BD) is of interest, since—according to this model—DT seems relatively more influenced by a direct effect of anxious and, to a lesser extent, depressive temperament traits than BD, independently of current anxious and depressive symptoms. This is an intriguing finding since BD would seem to be more symptom-dependent than DT. It is noteworthy that, although a genetic vulnerability has been proposed for both DT and BD [58–60], the latter showed to be markedly influenced by socio-cultural processes as well [48] thus potentially explaining the lack of a direct role of temperament in this regard. In fact, BD is so prevalent in Western Countries to be considered as a “normative discontent” [61]; relatively, cultural influence resulted to strongly predict BD even after controlling for BMI [62] and influential models have been proposed to link socio-culturally mediated factors to body dissatisfaction [63, 64]. All in all, BD is confirmed as a multi-faceted construct potentially influenced by a myriad of factors that future research may want to analyze. Therefore, from a clinical standpoint, DT and BD may require a different approach in treatment given their partially different “response” to patients’ innate temperament.

Moreover, the other side of the previous finding on the direct effect is the measurement of the causal mediation effect of the mediators considered, namely trait and state anxiety, depressive symptoms, and their joint effect. When considering every single mediator, state anxiety reported the strongest effect (with estimates twice as high as those of depression), depressive symptoms showed intermediate results while trait anxiety did not show any mediation effect. However, their joint mediation effect was greater than that of any mediator as a stand-alone entity. Altogether, our findings show that these three major factors (i.e., temperament, anxiety/depression, and body-related symptoms of AN) are interwoven and should be considered as key elements in the development and maintenance of AN. On one hand, this finding provides useful parallelism to studies of network analysis showing that depressive and anxious symptoms are central in AN psychopathology [17, 18]. Nevertheless, this is the first time that the effect of these highly inter-correlated constructs [24, 65] is estimated. Also, the proposed models provided a scientific measure of an every-day clinical notion, since anxiety, both singularly and jointly measured, was found to significantly mediate psychopathological variables. Furthermore, anxiety has been linked to clinical severity as measured by BMI [66]. Still, in the framework of the intriguing scientific debate on anxiety in AN [9, 14, 33], our findings support earlier literature suggesting severe malnutrition

as exacerbating the eating core psychopathology aspects of patients with AN [28] in a fine-grained fashion. If the role of state anxiety was supported, trait anxiety, namely patients’ usual and stable levels of anxiety, did not result to be a significant mediator. This is an unexpected finding, given the relevance of anxiety in AN [15, 21, 67]. On one hand, it could be proposed that trait anxiety shows relevant “shared” and somehow overlapping characteristics with the anxious temperament (at least with respect to how the questionnaires address this construct) thus decreasing the chance to be “detected” by the applied statistical method. However, on the other hand, it could be argued instead that, the marked inpatients’ levels of state anxiety take the lion’s share in the model, in keeping with the aforementioned hypothesis on the state-dependent aggravation of the anxiety diathesis [28]. The mediation effect of BDI showed intermediate results instead. In fact, after intermediate Bonferroni’s correction, depressive symptoms resulted to negatively mediate only the relationship between the hyperthymic temperament and DT. Although the literature on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy had already shown that depression significantly influences weight gain [25, 68], this is a novel finding that tends to dampen earlier findings [17, 18] since, according to our model, it can be surmised that current anxious symptoms impact more on DT and BD than depression in inpatients with severe AN.

Should these data be confirmed, some interesting clinical implications could be proposed. In fact, our data suggest that—when treating AN sufferers in a severe phase of their disorder–close attention should be paid to patients’ constellation of comorbid psychiatric symptoms. Also, it could be raised that hypothesis that, from a clinical standpoint, working on DT and BD could require different treatment approaches, given the different influence of patients’ innate characteristics on DT and BD. In this vein, temperament-based treatments have been authoritatively proposed and are currently being validated [69]. Additionally, therapeutic interventions may want to tackle the more punctiform anxiety and depressive components in treatment as well. For example, although no medications can reverse the core symptoms of AN, pharmacotherapy could be helpful in this regard [70, 71]. Additionally, from a psychotherapy standpoint, the management of anxiety and depression can improve patients’ motivation and quality of life [72].

In closing, prompted by the state-of-the-art supporting the entrenched nature of AN psychopathology and anxious and depressive symptoms, we designed models trying to disentangle this relationship and, importantly, measure the effect of each component involved. We found that temperament per se has a relevant impact on body-related core components of AN, namely DT and BD. However, a clear direct effect could be identified only for the anxious and, to a lesser extent, the depressive temperaments on DT. Also, state anxiety was the
strongest mediator as a standalone component when com-
pared to depression and trait-anxiety. In keeping with earlier
literature [24], the joint effect of all mediators resulted to be
even stronger than state anxiety alone. The proposed mod-
els of mediation of anxiety and depression between affec-
tive temperaments and body-related psychopathology of
AN allowed to quantify direct and indirect effects that were
found to be consistent with every-day clinical practice. In
fact, clinicians and researchers who work with AN sufferers
know well how innate characteristics (i.e., temperament) and
current clinical symptoms (i.e., anxiety and depression) can
impact on core symptoms of AN. Therefore, if confirmed by
further studies, our data contribute to the ongoing scientific
debate aiming to shed light on this complex picture also
providing some intriguing clinical implications.

Strength and limits

Overall, this study has some relevant strengths including
the innovative statistical method allowing to measure mul-
tiple mediators and their joint effect, the recruitment of
“real world” patients with severe AN (no insurance/finan-
cial barriers exist, according to the Italian National Health
System), the pure and full-blown diagnosis of AN, and the
aforementioned clinical implications. Nevertheless, some
limitations should be acknowledged as well: we recruited
only inpatients so this could hamper data generalizability,
the sample could be larger, and a cross-sectional design self-
report assessments have been used. Even though we applied
an advanced method for mediation inference, future studies
on larger samples are needed to expand knowledge on its
application. It is important to point out that for this study
we did not carry out power or sample size calculations as
no methods currently exist adapted to our causal multiple
mediation setting. Moreover, we reiterate that our quantita-
tive results are valid as long as our assumption of the causal
models relating all the variables at stake that is depicted
by the DAG in Fig. 1 holds true, with recent advances in
the causal inference literature potentially expanding our
knowledge in this regard. The statistical method that we
applied relies on strong assumptions among which the lack
of measured or unmeasured confounders of the relationships
between candidate mediators and response variables [54].
Accordingly, we assumed that temperaments do not have an
impact on BMI. Even though there is no literature support-
ing the finding that temperament itself is able to modify,
from a causal standpoint, individuals’ BMI, it is important to
put forward this possibly controversial assumption. Another
hypothesis we made is that candidate mediators do not caus-
ally affect each other. Even though this strong assumption
can be seen as a limitation, we highlight that we referred to
symptoms (of anxiety and depression) rather than to a formal
diagnosis of anxiety or depression and, at such a symptom

level, it is reasonable to believe that state and trait anxiety
and depression can be much causally unrelated. Finally, we
assumed the five temperaments as independent. With that
being said, if these findings will be confirmed by further
studies, these data could be much informative from a clini-
cal perspective.

What is already known on this subject?

Research consistently supported the role of temperament as a vulnerability and maintaining factor for anorexia nervosa (AN). Also anxiety and depression are key-elements in AN even from an outcome perspective. However, currently little is known about the role of temperament as compared to that of anxiety and depressive symptoms on core aspects of AN psychopathology (i.e., drive for thinness [DT] and body dissatisfaction [BD]).

What this study adds?

An innovative statistical method allowing to measure mul-
tiple mediators and their joint effect was applied to inves-
tigate and quantify the relationship between affective tem-
peraments, anxiety, and depression on DT and BD in AN.
This study clarified that affective temperaments impacted on
body-related core components of AN; a clear direct effect
could be identified only for the anxious and depressive tem-
peraments. Also, state anxiety resulted to have the strongest
mediator effect.

**Supplementary Information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01397-4.

**Author contributions** EM and VP designed the project. ND, EM and GAD acquired and managed the data. AJ performed the analysis under the supervision of VP. EM and VP drafted the manuscript. AJ, ND and GAD critically reviewed the manuscript. This work has been approved by each author and by the responsible authorities where it has been carried out.

**Funding** Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

**Data availability** Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

**Code availability** Not applicable.

Declarations

**Conflict of interest** The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

**Ethical approval** The Ethical Committee of the Department of Neuro-
science of the University of Turin, Italy, approved this study.
**Consent to participate** All participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

**Consent for publication** All authors provided their consent for publication for this work.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

1. Wonderlich SA, Bulik CM, Schmidt U et al (2020) Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: update and observations about the current clinical reality. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23283

2. Galmiche M, Déchelotte P, Lambert G, Tavolacci MP (2019) Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: a systematic literature review. Am J Clin Nutr 109:1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy342

3. Keski-Rahkonen A, Mustelin L (2016) Epidemiology of eating disorders in Europe. Curr Opin Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000278

4. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC

5. Junne F, Zipfel S, Wild B et al (2016) The relationship of body image with symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with anorexia nervosa during outpatient psychotherapy: results of the ANTOP study. Psychother (Chic) 53:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst00000064

6. Giovanni AD, Carla G, Enrica M et al (2011) Eating disorders and major depression: role of anger and personality. Depress Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/194732

7. Ulfvebrand S, Birgegård A, Norring C et al (2015) Psychiatric comorbidity in women and men with eating disorders results from a large clinical database. Psychiatry Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.008

8. Garcia SC, Mikhail ME, Keel PK et al (2020) Increased rates of eating disorders and their symptoms in women with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23366

9. Fairweather-Schmidt AK, Wade TD (2020) Common genetic architecture and environmental risk factors underpin the anxiety-disordered eating relationship: Findings from an adolescent twin cohort. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23155

10. Watson HJ, Yilmaz Z, Thornton LM et al (2019) Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabol-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nat Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2

11. Bulik CM, Sullivan PF, Fear JI, Joyce PR (1997) Eating disorders and antecedent anxiety disorders: a controlled study. Acta Psychi atr Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09913.x

12. Deep AL, Nagy LM, Weltzin TE et al (1995) Premorbid onset of psychopathology in long-term recovered anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199504)17:3%3c291::AID-EAT2260170310%3e3.0.CO;2-#

13. Godart NT, Flament MF, Lecrubier Y, Jeammet P (2000) Anxiety disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: co-morbidity and chronology of appearance. Eur Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00212-1

14. Klump KL, Strober M, Bulik CM et al (2004) Personality characteristics of women before and after recovery from an eating disorder. Psychol Med. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291704002442

15. Kezelman S, Touyz S, Hunt C, Rhodes P (2015) Does anxiety improve during weight restoration in anorexia nervosa? a systematic review. J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-015-0046-2

16. Lilenfeld LR, Kaye WH, Greeno CG et al (1998) A controlled family study of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:603. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.55.7.603

17. Monteleone AM, Mereu A, Cascino G et al (2019) Re-conceptualization of anorexia nervosa psychopathology: a network analysis study in adolescents with short duration of the illness. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23137

18. Solmi M, Collantoni E, Meneguzzo P et al (2019) Network analysis of specific psychopathology and psychiatric symptoms in patients with anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2633

19. Keski-Rahkonen A, Raevuori A, Bulik CM et al (2014) Factors associated with recovery from anorexia nervosa: a population-based study. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22168

20. Mattar L, Huas C, Duclos J et al (2011) Relationship between malnutrition and depression or anxiety inanorexia nervosa: a critical review of the literature. J Affect Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.014

21. Zerwas S, Lund BC, Von Holle A et al (2013) Factors associated with recovery from anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.02.011

22. Franko DL, Tabri N, Keshaviah A et al (2018) Predictors of long-term recovery in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: data from a 22-year longitudinal study. J Psychiatr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.008

23. Mischoulon D, Eddy KT, Keshaviah A et al (2011) Depres-sion and eating disorders: treatment and course. J Affect Disord 130:470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.043

24. Junne F, Wild B, Resmark G et al (2019) The importance of body image disturbances for the outcome of outpatient psychotherapy in patients with anorexia nervosa: results of the ANTOP-study. Eur Eat Disord Rev 27:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2623

25. Eskild-Jensen M, Støving RK, Flindt CF, Sjogren M (2020) Comorbid depression as a negative predictor of weight gain during treatment of anorexia nervosa: a systematic scoping review. Eur Eat Disord Rev 28:605–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2787

26. Lilenfeld LRR (2010) Personality and temperament. In: Adan R, Kaye W (eds) Behavioral neurobiology of eating disorders. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–16

27. Atiye M, Miettunen J, Raevuori-Helkamaa A (2015) A meta-analysis of temperament in eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 23:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2342

28. Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M (2009) New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2682

29. Kaye WH, Wierenga CE, Bailer UF et al (2013) Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci 36:110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.003
30. Segura-García C, Chiodo D, Sinopoli F, De Fazio P (2013) Temperamental factors predict long-term modifications of eating disorders after treatment. BMC Psychiatry 13:288. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-288

31. Anderluh MB, Tchanturia K, Rabe-Hesketh S, Treasure J (2003) Childhood obsessive-compulsive personality traits in adult women with eating disorders: defining a broader eating disorder phenotype. Am J Psychiatry 160:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.242

32. Cassin S, Vonranson K (2005) Personality and eating disorders: a decade in review. Clin Psychol Rev 25:895–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.012

33. Kaye WH, Bulik CM, Thornton L et al (2004) Comorbidity of anxiety disorders with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 161:2215–2221. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2215

34. Wagner A, Barbarich-Marsteller NC, Frank GK et al (2006) Personality traits after recovery from eating disorders: do subtypes differ? Int J Eat Disord 39:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20251

35. Ramacciotti CE, Paoli RA, Ciapparelli A et al (2004) Affective temperament in the eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord—Stud Anorexia, Bulim Obes 9:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325054

36. Marzola E, Fassino S, Amianto F, Abbate-Daga G (2017) Affective temperaments in anorexia nervosa: the relevance of depressive and anxious traits. J Affect Disord 218:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.054

37. Marzola E, Porliod A, Panero M et al (2020) Affective temperaments and eating psychopathology in anorexia nervosa: which role for anxious and depressive traits? J Affect Disord 266:374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.142

38. Goldsmith HH, Buss AH, Plomin R et al (1987) Roundtable: what is temperament? Four Approaches Child Dev 58:505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130527

39. Akiskal HS (1983) The relationship of personality to affective disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:801. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060099013

40. Perna G, di Pasquale D, Grassi M et al (2012) Temperament, character and anxiety sensitivity in panic disorder: a high-risk study. Psychopathology 45:300–304. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335072

41. Saguem BN, Mtiraoui A, Nakhli J et al (2019) Affective temperaments and their relationships with life events in bipolar patients and siblings: a controlled study. J Ment Healt. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1608924

42. Vázquez GH, Gonda X, Lolich M et al (2018) Suicidal risk and affective temperaments, evaluated with the TEMPS-A scale. Harv Rev Psychiatry 26:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.00000000000000153

43. Mason TB, Lavender JM, Wonderlich SA et al (2018) Examining a momentary mediation model of appearance-related stress, anxiety, and eating disorder behaviors in adult anorexia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord—Stud Anorexia, Bulim Obes 23:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-017-0404-y

44. Fiore F, Ruggiero GM, Sassaroli S (2014) Emotional dysregulation and anxiety control in the psychopathological mechanism underlying drive for thinness. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00043

45. Torres S, Guerra MP, Lencastre L et al (2015) Alexithymia in anorexia nervosa: the mediating role of depression. Psychiatry Res 225:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.10.023

46. Benazzi F (2009) Cyclothymic temperament: the impact of age. Psychopathology 42:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000207458

47. McLean SA, Paxton SJ (2019) Body image in the context of eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 42:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2018.10.006

48. Stice E, Shaw HE (2002) Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology. J Psychosom Res 53:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00488-9

49. Paans NPG, Bot M, Brouwer IA et al (2018) Contributions of depression and body mass index to body image. J Psychiatr Res 103:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.003

50. Toppino F, Longo P, Martini M, Abbate-Daga G, Marzola E (2022) Body Mass index specifiers in anorexia nervosa: anything below the “Extreme”? J Clin Med 11:542

51. First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL (2015) Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 research version. American Psychiatric Association Publishing, Washington, DC, USA, pp 1–94

52. Pompili M, Girardi P, Tatarelli R et al (2008) TEMPS-A (Rome): Psychometric validation of affective temperaments in clinically well subjects in mid- and south Italy. J Affect Disord 107:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.031

53. Rizzardi M, Trombini E, Trombini G. (1995) DI-2 eating disorder inventory-2: manuale. Firenze OS Organ Spec

54. Lazzari R, Pancheri P. (1980) Questionario di Valutazione del-Ansia di Stato e di Tratto

55. At BECK (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.017101200311004

56. VanderWeele T (2016) Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. Int J Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw277

57. Jéronol A, Baglietto L, Birmelé E et al (2020) Causal mediation analysis in presence of multiple mediators uncausally related. Int J Biostat. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2019-0088

58. Devlin B (2002) Linkage analysis of anorexia nervosa incorporating behavioral covariates. Hum Mol Genet 11:689–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.6.689

59. Rojo-Moreno L, Iranzo-Tatay C, Gimeno-Clemente N et al (2017) Influencias genéticas y ambientales en rasgos psicológicos y actividades alimentarias en una población escolar española. Rev Psiquatr Salud Ment 10:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.05.003

60. Boraska V, Davis OSP, Cherkas LF et al (2012) Genome-wide association analysis of eating disorder-related symptoms, behaviors, and personality traits. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet 159B:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32087

61. Cash TF, Henry PE (1995) Women's body images: the results of a national survey in the USA. Sex Roles 33:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547933

62. Hardit SK, Hannum JW (2012) Attachment, the tripartite influence model, and the development of body dissatisfaction. Body Image 9:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.06.003

63. Ouwens MA, van Strien T, van Leeuwe JFJ, van der Staak CPF (2009) The dual pathway model of overeating. replication and extension with actual food consumption. Appetite 52:234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.010

64. van den Berg P, Thompson JK, Obremski-Brandon K, Covert M (2002) The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance. J Psychosom Res 53:1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00499-3

65. Jacobson NC, Newman MG (2017) Anxiety and depression as bidirectional risk factors for one another: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 143:1155–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000111

66. Dellava JE, Thornton LM, Hamer RM et al (2010) Childhood anxiety associated with low BMI in women with anorexia nervosa. Behav Res Ther 48:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.009

67. Swinbourne J, Hunt C, Abbott M et al (2012) The comorbidity between eating disorders and anxiety disorders: prevalence in an eating disorder sample and anxiety disorder sample. Aust

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /></figure>
New Zeal J Psychiatry 46:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867411432071

68. Marcoulides OK, Waller G (2012) Nonspecific predictors of weight gain in the early stages of outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with anorexia nervosa: replication and extension. Int J Eat Disord 45:746–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22014

69. Kaye WH, Wierenga CE, Knatz S et al (2015) Temperament-based treatment for anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 23:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2330

70. Marzola E, Desedime N, Giovannone C et al (2015) Atypical antipsychotics as augmentation therapy in anorexia nervosa. PLoS One 10:e0125569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125569

71. Dold M, Aigner M, Klabunde M et al (2015) Second-generation antipsychotic drugs in anorexia nervosa: a meta-analysis of

randomized controlled trials. Psychother Psychosom 84:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369978

72. Sloan E, Hall K, Moulding R et al (2017) Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 57:141–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.002

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.