[13] S. Luo, M. Vellakal, S. Koric, V. Kindratenko, and J. Cui, Parameter identification of RANS turbulence model using physics-embedded neural network, in *Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing* (Springer, Berlin, 2020), pp. 137–149.

[14] H. Eivazi, M. Tahani, P. Schlatter, and R. Vinuesa, Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, *Phys. Fluids* **34**, 075117 (2022).

[15] J. G. R. von Saldern, J. M. Reumschüssel, T. L. Kaiser, M. Sieber, and K. Oberleithner, Mean flow data assimilation based on physics-informed neural networks, *Phys. Fluids* **34**, 115129 (2022).

[16] F. Pioch, J. H. Harmening, A. M. Müller, F. Peitzmann, D. Schramm, and O. el Moctar, Turbulence modeling for physics-informed neural networks: Comparison of different RANS models for the backward-facing step flow, *Fluids* **8**, 43 (2023).

[17] D. P. G. Foures, N. Dovetta, D. Sipp, and P. J. Schmid, A data-assimilation method for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes-driven mean flow reconstruction, *J. Fluid Mech.* **759**, 404 (2014).

[18] S. Symon, N. Dovetta, B. J. McKeon, D. Sipp, and P. J. Schmid, Data assimilation of mean velocity from 2D PIV measurements of flow over an idealized airfoil, *Exp. Fluids* **58**, 61 (2017).

[19] A. P. Singh, A framework to improve turbulence models using full-field inversion and machine learning, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, 2018.

[20] J. R. Holland, J. D. Baeder, and K. Duraisamy, Towards integrated field inversion and machine learning with embedded neural networks for RANS modeling, in *Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech Forum* (AIAA, San Diego, California, USA, 2019), p. 1884.

[21] P. S. Volpiani, M. Meyer, L. Franceschini, J. Dandois, F. Renac, E. Martin, O. Marquet, and D. Sipp, Machine learning-augmented turbulence modeling for RANS simulations of massively separated flows, *Phys. Rev. Fluids* **6**, 064607 (2021).

[22] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, *J. Comput. Phys.* **378**, 686 (2019).

[23] A. D. Jagtap, D. Mitsotakis, and G. E. Karniadakis, Deep learning of inverse water waves problems using multi-fidelity data: Application to Serre-Green-Naghdi equations, *Ocean Eng.* **248**, 110775 (2022).

[24] Z. Mao, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **360**, 112789 (2020).

[25] A. D. Jagtap, Z. Mao, N. Adams, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows, *J. Comput. Phys.* **466**, 111402 (2022).

[26] H. Gao, L. Sun, and J. X. Wang, Super-resolution and denoising of fluid flow using physics-informed convolutional neural networks without high-resolution labels, *Phys. Fluids* **33**, 073603 (2021).

[27] D. Kelshaw, G. Rigas, and L. Magri, Physics-informed CNNs for super-resolution of sparse observations on dynamical systems, arXiv:2210.17319.

[28] G. Hasanuzzaman, H. Eivazi, S. Merbold, C. Egbers, and R. Vinuesa, Enhancement of PIV measurements via physics-informed neural networks, *Meas. Sci. Technol.* **34**, 044002 (2023).

[29] L. Sliwinski and G. Rigas, Mean flow reconstruction of unsteady flows using physics-informed neural networks, *Data-Centric Eng.* **4**, e4 (2023).

[30] J. P. Molnar, L. Venkatakrishnan, B. E. Schmidt, T. A. Sipkens, and S. J. Grauer, Estimating density, velocity, and pressure fields in supersonic flows using physics-informed BOS, *Exp. Fluids* **64**, 14 (2023).

[31] A. D. Jagtap, E. Kharazmi, and G. E. Karniadakis, Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **365**, 113028 (2020).

[32] A. D. Jagtap and G. E. Karniadakis, Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations, *Commun. Comput. Phys.* **28**, 2002 (2020).

[33] K. Shukla, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis, Parallel physics-informed neural networks via domain decomposition, *J. Comput. Phys.* **447**, 110683 (2021).

[34] Z. Hu, A. D. Jagtap, G. E. Karniadakis, and K. Kawaguchi, When do extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs) improve generalization? *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* **44**, A3158 (2022).
[35] S. Mishra and R. Molinaro, Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEs, *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* **42**, 981 (2022).

[36] T. De Ryck, A. D. Jagtap, and S. Mishra, Error estimates for physics-informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations, *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* **44**, 83 (2023).

[37] Y. Du, M. Wang, and T. A. Zaki, State estimation in minimal turbulent channel flow: A comparative study of 4DVar and PINN, *Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow* **99**, 109073 (2023).

[38] V. Mons, O. Marquet, B. Leclaire, P. Cornic, and F. Champagnat, Dense velocity, pressure and Eulerian acceleration fields from single-instant scattered velocities through Navier-Stokes-based data assimilation, *Meas. Sci. Technol.* **33**, 124004 (2022).

[39] The data is available from https://github.com/xiaoh/para-database-for-PIML.

[40] S. Laizet and N. Li, Incompact3d: A powerful tool to tackle turbulence problems with up to O (105) computational cores, *Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids* **67**, 1735 (2011).

[41] H. Xiao, J. L. Wu, S. Laizet, and L. Duan, Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: A dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations, *Comput. Fluids* **200**, 104431 (2020).

[42] L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G. E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, *SIAM Rev.* **63**, 208 (2021).

[43] https://github.com/RigasLab/PINN_SA.

[44] F. Hecht, New development in FreeFem++, *J. Numer. Math.* **20**, 251 (2012).

[45] A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **32**, 199 (1982).

[46] M. Olshanskii, G. Lube, T. Heister, and J. Löwe, Grad-div stabilization and subgrid pressure models for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **198**, 3975 (2009).

[47] J. Nocedal, Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage, *Math. Comp.* **35**, 773 (1980).

[48] M. J. Kochenderfer and T. A. Wheeler, *Algorithms for Optimization* (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2019).

[49] S. Wang, X. Yu, and P. Perdikaris, When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, *J. Comput. Phys.* **449**, 110768 (2022).

[50] S. Wang, Y. Teng, and P. Perdikaris, Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks, *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* **43**, A3055 (2021).

[51] R. van der Meer, C. W. Oosterlee, and A. Borovykh, Optimally weighted loss functions for solving pdes with neural networks, *J. Comput. Appl. Math.* **405**, 113887 (2022).

[52] Q. Zeng, S. H. Bryngelson, and F. Schäfer, Competitive physics informed networks, arXiv:2204.11144.

[53] A. D. Jagtap, K. Kawaguchi, and G. E. Karniadakis, Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks, *Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.* **476**, 20200334 (2020).
[35] S. Mishra and R. Molinaro, Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEs, *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* **42**, 981 (2022).

[36] T. De Ryck, A. D. Jagtap, and S. Mishra, Error estimates for physics-informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations, *IMA J. Numer. Anal.* **44**, 83 (2023).

[37] Y. Du, M. Wang, and T. A. Zaki, State estimation in minimal turbulent channel flow: A comparative study of 4DVar and PINN, *Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow* **99**, 109073 (2023).

[38] V. Mons, O. Marquet, B. Leclaire, P. Cornic, and F. Champagnat, Dense velocity, pressure and Eulerian acceleration fields from single-instant scattered velocities through Navier-Stokes-based data assimilation, *Meas. Sci. Technol.* **33**, 124004 (2022).

[39] The data is available from https://github.com/xiaoh/para-database-for-PIML.

[40] S. Laizet and N. Li, Incompact3d: A powerful tool to tackle turbulence problems with up to O (105) computational cores, *Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids* **67**, 1735 (2011).

[41] H. Xiao, J. L. Wu, S. Laizet, and L. Duan, Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: A dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations, *Comput. Fluids* **200**, 104431 (2020).

[42] L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G. E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, *SIAM Rev.* **63**, 208 (2021).

[43] https://github.com/RigasLab/PINN_SA.

[44] F. Hecht, New development in FreeFem++, *J. Numer. Math.* **20**, 251 (2012).

[45] A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **32**, 199 (1982).

[46] M. Olshanskii, G. Lube, T. Heister, and J. Löwe, Grad-div stabilization and subgrid pressure models for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, *Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.* **198**, 3975 (2009).

[47] J. Nocedal, Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage, *Math. Comp.* **35**, 773 (1980).

[48] M. J. Kochenderfer and T. A. Wheeler, *Algorithms for Optimization* (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2019).

[49] S. Wang, X. Yu, and P. Perdikaris, When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, *J. Comput. Phys.* **449**, 110768 (2022).

[50] S. Wang, Y. Teng, and P. Perdikaris, Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks, *SIAM J. Sci. Comput.* **43**, A3055 (2021).

[51] R. van der Meer, C. W. Oosterlee, and A. Borovykh, Optimally weighted loss functions for solving pdes with neural networks, *J. Comput. Appl. Math.* **405**, 113887 (2022).

[52] Q. Zeng, S. H. Bryngelson, and F. Schäfer, Competitive physics informed networks, arXiv:2204.11144.

[53] A. D. Jagtap, K. Kawaguchi, and G. E. Karniadakis, Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks, *Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.* **476**, 20200334 (2020).