# Calcium signals inhibition sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-Bcl-xL strategies through Mcl-1 down-regulation

Marie-Laure Bonnefond, Bernard Lambert, Florence Giffard, Edwige Abeilard, Emilie Brotin, Marie-Hélène Louis, Mor Sény Gueye, Pascal Gauduchon, Laurent Poulain, Monique N'diaye

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Marie-Laure Bonnefond, Bernard Lambert, Florence Giffard, Edwige Abeilard, Emilie Brotin, et al. Calcium signals inhibition sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-Bcl-xL strategies through Mcl-1 down-regulation. Apoptosis, 2015, 20 (4), pp.535 - 550. 10.1007/s10495-015-1095-3. inserm-05481887

HAL Id: inserm-05481887

https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-05481887v1

Submitted on 28 Jan 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
# Calcium signals inhibition sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-Bcl-xL strategies through Mcl-1 down-regulation

Marie-Laure Bonnefond · Bernard Lambert ·

Florence Giffard · Edwige Abeilard · Emilie Brotin ·

Marie-Hélène Louis · Mor Sény Gueye ·

Pascal Gauduchon · Laurent Poulain · Monique N'Diaye

Published online: 28 January 2015

© The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

**Abstract** Ovarian carcinoma is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the developed world and is characterized by acquired chemoresistance leading to an overall 5-year survival rate of about 30 %. We previously showed that Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 cooperatively protect platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells from apoptosis. Despite BH3-mimetics represent promising drugs to target Bcl-xL, anti-Mcl-1 strategies are still in pre-clinical studies and required new investigations. Calcium is a universal second messenger and dysregulation of calcium signal is often observed during carcinogenesis. As change in cytosolic free calcium concentration [Ca²⁺]ᵢ is known to control the

fate of the cell by regulating Bcl-2 family members, we wonder if calcium signal could impact on Mcl-1 expression and if its pharmacological inhibition could be useful to sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-Bcl-xL strategies. We therefore studied the effect of different calcium signals inhibitors in ovarian carcinoma cell lines SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 and analysed their effects on proliferation and Mcl-1 expression. We also exposed these cells to these inhibitors in combination with anti-Bcl-xL strategies (siRNA or BH3-mimetic: ABT-737). We found that calcium signaling regulates Mcl-1 through translational events and a calmodulin-mediated pathway. BAPTA-AM and calmodulin inhibitor combination with ABT-737 leads to apoptosis, a process that is reversed by Mcl-1 enforced expression. As Mcl-1 represents a crucial hurdle to the success of chemotherapy, these results could open to new area of investigation using calcium modulators to directly or indirectly target Mcl-1 and thus efficiently sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-Bcl-xL strategies.

**Electronic supplementary material** The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10495-015-1095-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

M.-L. Bonnefond · B. Lambert · F. Giffard · E. Abeilard ·

E. Brotin · M.-H. Louis · M. S. Gueye · P. Gauduchon ·

L. Poulain · M. N'Diaye (✉)

Normandy University, Caen, France

e-mail: monique.ndiaye@unicaen.fr

M.-L. Bonnefond · B. Lambert · F. Giffard · E. Abeilard ·

E. Brotin · M.-H. Louis · M. S. Gueye · P. Gauduchon ·

L. Poulain · M. N'Diaye

UNICAEN, INSERM U1199 “Biology and Innovative Therapeutics of Locally Aggressive Cancers” Unit, Caen, France

M.-L. Bonnefond · B. Lambert · F. Giffard · E. Abeilard ·

E. Brotin · M.-H. Louis · M. S. Gueye · P. Gauduchon ·

L. Poulain · M. N'Diaye

François Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, BP5026, 14076 Caen Cedex 05, France

B. Lambert

CNRS (placed at the disposition of EA4656 by CNRS),
Délégation régionale Ile-de-France Est, 94532 Thiais Cedex,
France

**Keywords** Ovarian cancer · Calmodulin · Mcl-1 · Calcium signal · mTOR

**Abbreviations**

4E-BP1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein

BAPTA-AM 1,2-Bis-(o-Aminophenoxy)-ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, tetraacetoxymethyl ester

[Ca²⁺]ᵢ Intracytosolic calcium concentration

CaMKII Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II

CREB C-AMP response element-binding protein

EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor

eIF4E Eukaryotic translation initiator factor 4E

ERK 1/2 Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
<table><tr><td>HA14-1</td><td>Ethyl [2-amino-6-bromo-4-(1-cyano-2-ethoxy-2-oxoethyl)]-4H-chromene-3-carboxylate</td></tr><tr><td>MEK</td><td>Mitogen-activated protein kinase</td></tr><tr><td>mTORC1/2</td><td>Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2</td></tr><tr><td>p70S6K</td><td>p70 S6 Kinase</td></tr><tr><td>PARP</td><td>Poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase</td></tr><tr><td>PI3 K</td><td>Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase</td></tr><tr><td>PKC</td><td>Protein kinase C</td></tr><tr><td>PLD</td><td>Phospholipase D</td></tr><tr><td>SERCA</td><td>Sarcoplasmic endoplasmic calcium ATPase</td></tr><tr><td>TRP</td><td>Transient receptor potential</td></tr><tr><td>z-VAD</td><td>N-benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fluoromethyl ketone</td></tr></table>

Introduction

Ovarian cancer causes more than 140 000 deaths worldwide every year, and is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in developed countries [1]. Standard treatment includes debulking surgery and subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy. Despite good initial response rates, acquired chemoresistance is a critical hurdle in the treatment of cancer and is responsible for relapse and leads to an overall survival rate of about 30 %. One major mode by which cancer cells evade chemotherapy is by an acquired ability to suppress intrinsic pathway of apoptosis [1]. The key regulators of apoptosis are the proteins of the Bcl-2 family which are classified in three groups: the anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1...) that sequester the multi-domain pro-apoptotic members group (Bax and Bak) preventing their oligomerization and subsequent apoptosis. The last group consists of the BH3-only members (Bad, Bid, Bim, Noxa, Puma...) those possess only the BH3 domain and act as sensors of cellular stress. They initiate apoptosis by either blocking the activity of anti-apoptotic members or directly activating pro-apoptotic members, which is mediated via interaction of the BH3 domain of one protein with the hydrophobic pocket of another [2].

Overexpression of Bcl-2 family members has been observed in a variety of cancers and contributes to chemoresistance. Actually, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 are often overexpressed in ovarian carcinoma and are associated with poor prognosis in these cancers [3, 4]. Although the down-regulation of either Bcl-xL or Mcl-1 remains ineffective, we showed that the concomitant inhibition of these proteins with siRNA was sufficient to induce massive cell death, highlighting the pivotal role these anti-apoptotic proteins

play in chemoresistant ovarian carcinoma and mesothelioma [5].

Several strategies have been developed to overcome Bcl-xL and BH3-mimetic drugs represent an exciting development in cancer therapeutics. Among these molecules, ABT-737 is the most promising candidate to clinic. It mimics the direct binding of Bad to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bcl-w, with a high-affinity ($K_i$ < 1 nM). However, it does not bind to Mcl-1 and Bfl-1 [6] that prevents it to induce cell death in tumor models that overexpress these anti-apoptotic proteins, such as ovarian cancer. Therefore, the use of Mcl-1 targeting agents in combination with BH3-mimetics could constitute an interesting therapeutic strategy in these types of cancers [7].

Many strategies have been developed to counteract Mcl-1 expression or activity such as RNA interference, Noxa overexpression [7] or platinum salts [8]. Mcl-1 is finely regulated and targeting canonical signaling pathways with kinases inhibitors such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK inhibitors gave promising results and strongly sensitized cancer cells to ABT-737 [9, 10]. Concomitant inhibition of these pathways is however required to avoid molecular crosstalks and to induce massive apoptosis [11]. The complexity of pathways controlling Mcl-1 and their interconnectivity encourage research to find other networks that could have a therapeutic interest.

Calcium is a universal second messenger that regulates a number of diverse cellular processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis, motility and secretion. The versatility of the signals is most strikingly exemplified by their role in life-and-death decisions. Consequently, $[Ca^{2+}]_i$ needs to be used in an appropriate manner to determine cell fate; if calcium signals are compromised, pathologies as carcinogenesis may occur. Actually, modifications of calcium pumps and channels are regularly observed in cancer and have impact on cellular proliferation by activating survival pathway or preventing apoptosis [12]. For example, inhibition of calcium permeable TRPC3 (transient receptor potential canonical type-3) channels, which are elevated in clinical epithelial ovarian cancer samples, reduces the proliferation of SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells [13]. The impact of $[Ca^{2+}]_i$ on apoptosis regulation could be explained by the tight relation between calcium homeostasis and Bcl-2 family members. Indeed, it has been described that anti-apoptotic members reduced apoptotic signals by allowing continuous calcium leak through endoplasmic reticulum leading to a reduced in amplitude calcium signal which prevented apoptosis trigger. On the contrary, calcium signal can modulate these proteins expression and increase in $[Ca^{2+}]_i$ was described to induce Bcl-2 expression through CREB (Calcium Response Element Binding protein) activation [14].
Several scattered examples suggest that calcium sig-
naling has an impact on Mcl-1 expression. Indeed, calcium
chelation leads to inhibition of EGFR targets (STAT3,
AKT, ERK 1/2) that are known to regulate Mcl-1 [15].
Moreover, thapsigargin which increase intracellular cal-
cium concentration via SERCA inhibition induces Mcl-1
expression in melanoma [16]. At last, KN93 a specific
calmodulin kinase inhibitor, decreases Mcl-1 expression in
prostate cell lines [17]. Here, we tested if calcium signaling
pathway inhibition could have an impact on Mcl-1
expression in chemoresistant ovarian carcinoma cells and
we evaluated the impact of its combination with anti-Bcl-
xL strategies.

**Materials and methods**

Cell culture

SKOV3 was obtained from American Type Culture Col-
lection (Manassas, USA). Resistant IGROV1-R10 cells
were obtained by reiterating treatments with increasing
concentrations of cisplatin as previously described [10].
Cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supple-
mented with 2 mM Glutamax™, 25 mM HEPES, 10 %
fetal calf serum, and 33 mM sodium bicarbonate (Fisher
Scientific Bioblock, France). Cells were maintained in a
5 % CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 °C.

Reagents

ABT-737 was purchased by Selleckem (Souffelweyers-
heim, France) and BAPTA-AM was purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). W7,
KN93, FIPI and z-VAD were provided by Tocris (R&D
Systems, Lille, France). These compounds were commonly
stored as stock solutions in DMSO at –20 °C. Bortezomib
(Velcade®) was supplied by Millennium Pharmaceuticals
(Cambridge, MA, USA).

Proliferation analysis

Cell number and viability were estimated by a semi-auto-
mated image-based cell analyzer (Cedex XS Analyzer,
Roche Applied Science, Meylan, France) using the Trypan
blue exclusion method.

Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry

Adherent and floating cells were pooled, washed with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 1X) and fixed with ethanol
70 %. Cells were then centrifuged at 2,000 r.p.m. for 5 min
and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in PBS 1X, to allow the

release of low-molecular weight DNA. Cell pellets were
stained with propidium iodide using the DNA Prep Coulter
Reagent Kit (Beckman-Coulter, France). Samples were
analysed using Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter,
France).

Western-immunoblotting

Cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS 1X and lysed in RIPA
buffer as previously described [8]. After centrifugation,
proteins were quantified using the Bradford assay (Bio-
Rad, CA). 30 µg of proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE
(Biorad, France) and transferred to PVDF-membranes
(Millipore, France). After blocking, membranes were
incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary
antibodies: anti-Mcl-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, France),
anti-Noxa (Calbiochem, France), anti-Bcl-2 (DAKO,
France), anti-actin (Sigma, Saint Louis, USA), anti-Bcl-xL,
PARP, Bim, caspase-3, p-AKT(thr308), p-AKT(ser473),
AKT, p-ERK(Thr202/Tyr204), ERK, p-4E-BP1(Thr70),
4E-BP1, p-p70S6K(Thr389) and p70S6K (Cell Signaling
Technology, Ozyme, France). Membranes were then
incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-
conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, France).
Revelation was done using ECL Prime Western Blot
detection reagent (GE Healthcare, France).

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative reverse
transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA were isolated from ovarian carcinoma cell lines
using Trizol (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, France). RNA
quantity and quality were assessed using the NanoDropTM
2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, France). The
first strand cDNA was synthesized using Omniscript
reverse transcriptase kit (Qiagen, France) with random
hexamers. cDNA (25 ng) were combined with 10 µmol/l of
each forward and reverse primers, 50 µmol/l of the Taq-
Man® probe and TaqMan® Fast Universal PCR Master
Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) in a 20 µl
final reaction volume. Corresponding custom inventoried
(ID: Hs00172036_m1 for Mcl-1 and Hs99999905_m1 for
GAPDH) TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays were used
(Applied Biosystems). All PCR amplification reactions
were carried out in triplicate and detection was done on an
Applied ABI Prism 7500 Fast PCR system (Applied Bio-
systems). GAPDH was used as a housekeeping reference
gene for normalization.

siRNA tranfection

PAGE purified siRNAs were synthesized and annealed by
the Eurogentec Company (Liège, Belgium). Specific
double-stranded 21 nt RNA oligonucleotides forming a 19 bp duplex core with 2 nt 3' overhangs were used to silence Bcl-xL expression (5'-auuggugagucggaucgca-3', noted siXL). siGENOME Non-Targeting siRNA Pool#1 (noted siCT) was purchased from Dharmacon. siRNA duplexes were transfected using the INTERFERin™ transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Polyplus-Transfection, France). Briefly, cells were seeded in 25 cm² flasks to reach 30–50 % of confluence at the time of transfection. The transfection reagent and the siRNAs were mixed and complex formation was allowed to proceed for 15 min at room temperature before to be applied to cells. After indicated time, cells were trypsinized and washed with ice-cold PBS 1X before to be analyzed.

## Plasmid construction and transfection

The MCL1 ORF (NM_021960.4, +209 to +1298) was amplified from IGROV-R10 cDNA by PCR using restriction enzyme containing-primers (sense 5' TTAAGCTTAT GTTTGGCCTCAAAAGAAA3'; antisens 5' GGTCTAGA GGTTGGTTAAAAGTCAACTATTGC 3'). The EIF4E ORF (NM_001968, +1519 to +2222) was amplified from IGROV-R10 cDNA by PCR using restriction enzyme containing-primers (sense 5' AACAAGCTTCTAAGAT GGCGACTGTCGAA 3'; antisens 5' AACAAGCTTCTA AGATGGCGACTGTCGAA 3'). The amplified ORF were restricted with HindIII and XbaI and cloned between the corresponding restriction sites of the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1. The sequences of the construction were checked. Empty vector pcDNA (named “Empty”) and Vector containing MCL1 ORF or EIF4E (named “Mcl-1” and “eIF4E” respectively) were transfected using JetPrime DNA transfecting agent (Polyplus-Transfection, France) as described by manufacturer.

## Real-time cellular cytotoxicity assay (xCELLigence)

Compound-mediated cytotoxicity was monitored using Real-Time Cell Analyzer Multi-Plate (RTCA MP) Instrument, xCELLigence System (ACEA, Ozyme, France). The system monitors cellular events in real time measuring electrical impedance across interdigitated micro-electrodes integrated on the bottom of tissue culture E-plates View. The increase in the number and size of cells attached to the electrode sensors leads to increased impedance, from which derive the cell index (CI) values displayed at the plot, reflecting changes in cell viability. Briefly, 96-well E-Plates were seeded and placed onto the RTCA MP in a tissue culture incubator. Treatments were realized 24 h

later and impedance was continuously measured. Standard deviations of well replicates were analyzed with the RTCA Software.

## Statistical analysis

Relative values were compared to the value of the control condition by a one-sample Student's t test.

## Results

### Cytostatic effect of calcium chelator BAPTA-AM

SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 were treated with increasing concentrations of BAPTA-AM for 6 and 24 h. Results revealed that BAPTA-AM had a dose dependent anti-proliferative effect that appeared from the dose of 10 µM as assessed by morphological features and cell viability for the two lines tested (Fig. 1a, b). The strongest dose tested (25 µM) induced shape modification of cells that became rounded and this effect was observable as soon as 6 h of treatment. Increase in sub-G1 peak was dose-dependent but remains modest even for the highest concentration of BAPTA-AM tested (Fig. 1c).

### BAPTA-AM inhibits Mcl-1 expression

IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 were then treated with increasing doses of BAPTA-AM (0, 5, 10, 25 µM) for 6 h and expression of Bcl-2 family members were analyzed upon this treatment. A deep decrease of Mcl-1 expression appeared from 10 µM in both cell lines (Fig. 2a). Concerning the other members of Bcl-2 family, Bcl-2 was not expressed in IGROV1-R10 and Bim not expressed in SKOV3 cells as previously described [8] however their expression were not modified in the cell line where they are present. As for Puma, this BH3-only was very slightly expressed in IGROV1-R10 cells and its expression also dose-dependently decreased upon BAPTA-AM treatment. This protein was not detected in SKOV3 cells in ours conditions. Noxa was detected in both cell lines and its expression was dose-dependently decreased upon BAPTA-AM treatment.

No PARP cleavage was observed confirming that BAPTA-AM did not induced apoptosis. A time-course experiment with 10 µM BAPTA-AM revealed that Mcl-1 expression dramatically decreased within 6 h but its expression is partially recovered for longer treatment indicating that BAPTA-AM effect is transient (Fig. 2b).
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Cytostatic effect of calcium chelator BAPTA-AM. IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with increasing concentrations of BAPTA-AM for 6 and 24 h. Response was appreciated by a morphological features b cell viability (assessed</figcaption></figure>

by the percentage of cell viability with respect to number of viable cells at 0 h) c assessment of sub-G1 peak (24 h). Data are representative of three independent experiments

BAPTA-AM–induced Mcl-1 decrease does not result from transcriptional and post-translational events but is associated with mTORC1 pathway inhibition

To decipher the mechanism underlying Mcl-1 down-regu-
lation by calcium inhibition, Mcl-1 mRNA expression in
SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 cells was quantified using RT-
qPCR. Treatment of cells with 10 µM BAPTA-AM for 6 h
did not significantly altered Mcl-1 at mRNA level

(Fig. 3a), suggesting that calcium signal inhibition induced
Mcl-1 down-regulation through transcription-independent
mechanism. We then tested the involvement of caspase on
Mcl-1 stability as Mcl-1 could be degraded by activated
caspase 3 [18]. Cells were treated with BAPTA-AM for 6 h
and pro- and cleaved- caspase 3 expressions were assessed.
No cleavage of caspase 3 was observed allowing us to
exclude involvement of caspase in BAPTA-AM–induced
Mcl-1 decrease (Fig. 3b).
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Dose-response and time course of BAPTA-AM-induced Mcl-1 decrease. **a** IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with increasing concentrations of BAPTA-AM for 6 h and expressions of Bcl-2 family members were appreciated by western blot and Mcl-1, Noxa and Puma expressions were quantified by Image J software. **b** IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated with</figcaption></figure>

10 µM BAPTA-AM from 0 to 24 h. Expression of Mcl-1 was assessed by western blot. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Mcl-1 expression was quantified by Image J software. The relative intensity of each *lane* was calculated with respect to the sample at 0 h

To analyse if Mcl-1 decrease upon BAPTA-AM treatment involves proteasomal degradation, we incubated ovarian carcinoma cells with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, for 1 h and then treated cells with BAPTA-AM for 6 h. As assessed in Fig. 3c, bortezomib dose-dependently prevented Mcl-1 degradation in SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 cells. However, this pre-treatment did not prevent the loss of Mcl-1 induced by intracellular calcium chelation, ruling out the involvement of posttranslational events in BAPTA-AM-induced Mcl-1 decrease and strongly suggesting translational events.

To further elucidate mechanisms by which BAPTA-AM might inhibit Mcl-1 translation, we studied the activation of AKT/mTOR pathway. This pathway is the most

frequently deregulated pathway in ovarian cancer and it is also known to regulate Mcl-1 translation focusing research to target this network in order to sensitize cancer cells [19]. Results showed that BAPTA-AM had no impact on p-AKT(ser473) but dose-dependently increased p-AKT (thr308) as quantifies by densitometry (Fig. 3D). On the contrary, mTORC1 targets, p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K were dose-dependently dephosphorylated in the two cell lines. This result suggests that calcium chelation could inhibit Mcl-1 translation via mTOR pathway inhibition in our models.

Mcl-1 could also be regulated by mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) as ERK 1/2 either by transcriptional or by post-translational events both leading to an
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** BAPTA-AM-induced Mcl-1 decrease does not result from transcriptional and post-translational events but is associated with mTORC1 pathway down-regulation. IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with 10 µM BAPTA-AM for 6 h. a Mcl-1 mRNA level was determined by real time quantitative RT-PCR, b PARP and Caspase 3 cleavages were assessed by western blot. c IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were pre-treated 1 h with DMSO, 10 or 100 nM bortezomib. Then cells were treated or not (DMSO)</figcaption></figure>

with 10 µM BAPTA-AM for 6 h. Expression of Mcl-1 was followed by western blot. Data are representative of three independent experiments. d IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with 5 and 10 µM BAPTA-AM for 6 h. AKT/mTOR as well as MAPK pathways were assessed for each condition and proteins expressions were quantified by Image J software. Data are representative of three independent experiments
up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic protein [18]. In order to investigate if Mcl-1 down-regulation was a consequence of p-ERK down-regulation by BAPTA-AM, we evaluated ERK phosphorylation status upon BAPTA-AM treatment. As depicted in western blots, [Ca²⁺]ᵢ inhibition led to an increase p-ERK 1/2 expression (1.5×) in both cell lines tested allowing us to rule out involvement of ERK in Mcl-1 down-regulation.

Calcium chelation combined with anti-Bcl-x<sub>L</sub> strategies leads to apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma

As Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 cooperates to prevent ovarian carcinoma cells from apoptosis, we next evaluated the efficacy of BAPTA-AM/anti-BclxL strategies combinations.

First, we combined BAPTA-AM with the BH3-mimetic ABT-737. We co-treated ovarian carcinoma cells with the two molecules and analysed cell viability by xCELLigence Technology (Fig. 4a). Results showed that treatment with ABT-737 or BAPTA-AM alone slowed down SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 proliferation compared to DMSO treatment. Conversely, combination of these drugs led to a dramatic drop in cell index (CI). Actually, CI fell to 0 with 6 h of treatment for both ovarian cell lines. This effect is correlated with appearance of floating cells (Fig. 4b), a strong increase of sub-G1 peak (36 % for IGROV1-R10 and 25 % for SKOV3 cells after 24 h of treatment, Fig. 4c) and a dramatic decrease in cell viability (48 % for IGROV1-R10 and 67 % for SKOV3 cells, Fig. 4d). These events were accompanied by caspase 3 and PARP cleavages (Fig. 4e).

To confirm this result, we combined BAPTA-AM with siRNA targeting Bcl-xL (siXL) (Supp data 1A). For this purpose, SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 cells transfected with siXL for 48 h and then treated with 10 µM BAPTA-AM. The treatments efficacy was followed by xCELLigence Technology. Results showed a dramatic decrease of cell index upon siXL/BAPTA-AM treatment in IGROV1-R10 cells and to a lesser extent in SKOV3 cells. Cell culture was also carried out and cells were transfected 48 h with siRNA and then treated 6 h with BAPTA-AM. Results revealed that whereas a modest apoptosis was obtained with siXL (siXL+DMSO) or BAPTA-AM (siCT+BAPTA-AM) alone, a massive cell death appeared with siXL/BAPTA-AM combination as assessed by morphological features (Supp data 1B). Moreover siXL/BAPTA-AM combination led to a strong increase of sub-G1 peak (57 % for IGROV1-R10 and 30 % for SKOV3 cells Supp data 1C) and a dramatic decrease in cell viability (49 % for IGROV1-R10 and 54 % for SKOV3 cells Supp data 1D) and to PARP and Caspase 3 cleavages (Supp data 1E).

To verify that caspases were involved in BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 combination-induced apoptosis, we pretreated SKOV3 cell line with a pan caspase inhibitor

z-VAD and then exposed cell to the combination of drugs for 6 h. As depicted in Supp. data 2, the strong sub-G1 peak and caspase 3 cleavage induced by this combination were totally abolished upon z-VAD pre-treatment.

PLD inhibition does not trigger Mcl-1 down-regulation

In order to decipher the molecular pathways that could connect [Ca²⁺]ᵢ and Mcl-1, we tested the effect of inhibitors of proteins known to be regulated by [Ca²⁺]ᵢ on Mcl-1 expression.

As Ballou and coworkers described in RAT-1 fibroblasts, an increase in [Ca²⁺]ᵢ can lead to PLD activation that in turn could activate mTOR and its downstream targets 4E-BP1 and p70S6K [20] It could then be hypothesized that inhibiting PLD could lead to Mcl-1 inhibition in our models. To answer this question, we treated ovarian carcinoma cells with increasing concentrations of 5-fluoro-2-indolyl des-chlorohalopemide (FIPI) a PLD pharmacological inhibitor for 6 and 24 h. The results presented in Supp. data 3A and 3B showed that FIPI did not modify Mcl-1 expression whatever the time and the FIPI concentration considered. Besides, a 6-h treatment with FIPI had no effect on AKT, mTOR, p70S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylations (Supp. data 3A). Moreover, FIPI combination with ABT-737 was also performed in IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells lines and followed with xCELLigence technology (Supp. data 3C). Results revealed that FIPI+ABT-737 treatment only slowed down the proliferation of carcinoma cells lines but had not a cytotoxic effect. These results suggest that the calcium/PLD/mTOR pathway does not seem to be involved in Mcl-1 regulation.

W7, a calmodulin inhibitor, decreases Mcl-1 expression and its combination with ABT-737 is cytotoxic

To further examine whether calcium mediates its effect on Mcl-1 through the calcium sensor calmodulin, we used a selective calmodulin antagonist, W7. As shown in Fig. 5a, 3-h treatment with W7 dose dependently decreased Mcl-1 expression in both cell lines. This effect was accompanied with a decrease of mTOR, p70S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation. W7 also caused significant inhibition of AKT (thr308) and (Ser473) phosphorylations in IGROV1-R10 cells whereas it had not effect on AKT phosphorylation in SKOV3 cells.

Then, we combined W7 with the BH3-mimetic ABT-737 and analysed cell viability by xCELLigence Technology (Fig. 5b). Results showed that treatment with 10 µM ABT-737 or 40 µM W7 alone slowed down SKOV3 and IGROV1-R10 proliferation compared to DMSO treatment. Conversely, combination of these drugs led to a dramatic drop in cell index. To confirm this result,
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** Calcium chelation combined with ABT-737 leads to apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma. **a** Real time analysis of cellular cytotoxicity of ABT-737/BAPTA-AM combination. Histogram was obtained using the xCELLigence System as described in "Materials and methods" section. Cells were grown for 24 h and then treated or not (DMSO) with 10 µM ABT-737 in presence or not (DMSO) of 10 µM BAPTA-AM. Cell index was recorded every 2 h, with displayed standard error</figcaption></figure>

bars. IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with 10 µM ABT-737 in presence or not (DMSO) of 10 µM BAPTA-AM for 6 and 24 h. **b** Morphological features and **c** DNA contents were studied for each condition. **d** Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion at 24 h. **e** PARP and caspase 3 cleavages were studied by western blot. Data are representative of three independent experiments
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5** Calmodulin antagonist W7 inhibits Mcl-1 expression and sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to ABT-737. a IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with increasing concentrations of W7 for 3 h and expressions of Mcl-1 and AKT/mTOR pathway were appreciated by western blot and proteins expressions were quantified by Image J software. Data are representative of three independent experiments. b Real time analysis of cellular cytotoxicity of ABT-737/W7 combination. Histogram was obtained using the</figcaption></figure>

xCELLigence System as described in "Materials and methods" section. Cells were grown for 24 h and then treated or not (DMSO) with 10 µM ABT-737 in presence or not (DMSO) of 40 µM W7. Cell index was recorded every 2 h, with displayed standard error bars. c IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 cells were treated or not (DMSO) with 10 µM ABT-737 in presence or not (DMSO) of increasing concentrations of W7 for 24 h. PARP cleavage was studied by western blot. Data are representative of three independent experiments
we treated cells this W7+ABT-737 combination and observed a strong apoptosis assessed by a decrease of cell viability, increase of sub-G1 peak (data not shown) and appearance of PARP cleavage (Fig. 5c).

Calcium-calmodulin dependent kinase II (CamKII) is not involved in Mcl-1 down-regulation

Ca(2+)/CaM binds and activates a plethora of enzymes, including Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CamKII), calmodulin kinase kinases (CamKK) or AKT [21]. CamKII is ubiquitously expressed and mediated diverse physiological response to increases in [Ca²⁺]ᵢ by virtue of its activation by Ca²⁺/calmodulin and auto-phosphorylation. CamKII is actually known to activate AKT/mTOR pathway and was demonstrated to down-regulate Mcl-1 in prostate cancer cells [17]. To test the potential involvement of CamKII in Mcl-1 down-regulation in our models, we treated ovarian cell lines with a well-known CamKII inhibitor, KN93. For this purpose, ovarian carcinoma cells were treated with increasing concentration of KN93 for 6 h. Mcl-1 and AKT/mTOR activation were then assessed by western blot and results revealed that KN93 has a modest effect on Mcl-1 (0.93× and 0.82× for 10 µM KN93 in IGROV1-R10 and SKOV3 respectively) and has a modest effect on AKT phosphorylation leading to the conclusion that a calcium/calmodulin/CAMKII pathway does not seem to be involved in Mcl-1 regulation in the conditions tested.

Enforced expression of Mcl-1 and eIF4E rescue ovarian carcinoma cells from apoptosis triggered by calcium inhibitors + ABT-737 combinations

In order to assess that down-regulation of Mcl-1 plays a central role in calcium inhibitors + ABT-737-induced apoptosis, we combined BAPTA-AM and W7 with ABT-737 in IGROV1-R10 cells overexpressing or not Mcl-1. Cells were transfected 40 h with empty pcDNA (Empty) or pcDNA containing Mcl-1 cDNA sequence (Mcl-1) as described in “Materials and methods” section and then treated with each combination for 24 h. Results presented in Fig. 6 suggest that enforced expression of Mcl-1 partially rescues ovarian carcinoma cell from calcium inhibitors + ABT-737-induced cytotoxicity as assessed by the decrease of the percentage of sub-G1 peak (45 vs 28 % for BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 condition and 61 vs 40 % W7+ABT-737 condition) (Fig. 6a), the increase of IGROV1-R10 cell viability (36 vs 66.5 % for BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 condition and 32 vs 53 % W7+ABT-737 condition) (Fig. 6b) and the reduction of Caspase 3 cleavage (Fig. 6c).

To confirm that BAPTA-AM and calmodulin regulate Mcl-1 through mTORC1 pathway, we overexpressed 4E-BP1

target eIF4E (eukaryotic translation Initiation Factor 4E). Actually, inactivation of the translational repressor 4E-BP1 by phosphorylation facilitates the detachment and subsequent phosphorylation of eIF4E. Phosphorylated eIF4E in turn forms a complex with eIF4A and eIF4G, which enables the translation of cap-dependent mRNA for proteins like Mcl-1 [22]. Cells were transfected 40 h with empty pcDNA (Empty) or pcDNA containing eIF4E cDNA sequence (eIF4E) and then treated with BAPTA-AM or W7+ABT-737 for 24 h. As presented in Fig. 6, enforced expression of eIF4E partially rescues ovarian carcinoma cell from calcium inhibitors + ABT-737-induced cytotoxicity as assessed by the decrease of the percentage of sub-G1 peak (48.6 vs 31.7 % for BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 condition and 52.3 vs 41.8 % W7+ABT-737 condition) (Fig. 6d), the increase of IGROV1-R10 cell viability (43.4 vs 66.3 % for BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 condition and 47.1 vs 65.7 % W7+ABT-737 condition) (Fig. 6e), an increase in Mcl-1 expression (1.5× in average) and the reduction of Caspase 3 and PARP cleavages (Fig. 6f).

## Discussion

In this study, we showed that BAPTA-AM had an anti-proliferative effect on its own from the dose of 10 µM. For the strongest concentration (25 µM) this effect was accompanied with morphological changes of cells that become rounded within 6 h of treatment. This loss of spindle-shape morphology with BAPTA-AM was also seen in breast cancer cells where this chelator promoted N-cadherin inhibition thereby preventing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by EGF [15].

BAPTA-AM treatment induced a strong inhibition of Mcl-1 expression. However response duration is short as Mcl-1 expression move back up after 24 h treatment. This could be due to BAPTA-AM degradation or to the extremely rapid turnover of Mcl-1. Actually Mcl-1 half-life is about 2 h and we previously demonstrated that in our model, its half-life was about 40 min [8] that could overcome BAPTA-AM action. Mcl-1 down-regulation was accompanied by a reduction in Noxa expression. This result was also observed when Mcl-1 is inhibited by AZD8055 [23] or silenced by siRNA mechanism in ovarian carcinoma cells [8] and melanoma cell lines [24] however further studies are required to understand this mechanism.

Mcl-1's own Achilles' Heel may lie in its tight regulation and because calcium can affect multiple pathways, we sought how it impacts on Mcl-1 expression. As induction of [Ca²⁺]ᵢ by thapsigargin has been described to increase Mcl-1 transcription in melanoma [16], we evaluated if calcium modulation could target Mcl-1 transcription in our models; however results suggest that this mechanism does not seem to be involved in ovarian carcinoma cells.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 6** Mcl-1 enforced expression rescue ovarian carcinoma cells from apoptosis triggered by BAPTA-AM/ABT-737 or W7/ABT-737 combinations. IGROV1-R10 cells were transfected with empty plasmid pcDNA (Empty) or pcDNA containing Mcl-1 ORF (Mcl-1) for 40 h as described in “Materials and methods” section. Then cell were treated with DMSO or cotreated either with 10 µM BAPTA-AM and 10 µM ABT-737 or 40 µM W7 and 10 µM ABT-737 for 24 h. **a** DNA contents were studied for each condition. **b** Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. **c** Mcl-1 expression and Caspase 3 cleavage were studied by western blot.</figcaption></figure>

IGROV1-R10 cells were transfected with empty plasmid pcDNA (Empty) or pcDNA containing EIF4E ORF (eIF4E) for 40 h as described in “Materials and methods” section. Then cell were treated with DMSO or cotreated either with 10 µM BAPTA-AM and 10 µM ABT-737 or 40 µM W7 and 10 µM ABT-737 for 24 h. **d** DNA contents were studied for each condition. **e** Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. **f** Mcl-1, eIF4E expression and PARP and Caspase 3 cleavage were studied by western blot.

Mcl-1 down-regulation can also be triggered by two post-translational pathways. The first one was attributed to the proteasome after ubiquitination by Mcl-1 Ubiquitin Ligase E3 (MULE) or beta transducin-containing protein (beta-TrCP). Secondly, Mcl-1 is known to be additionally subject to non-proteasomal degradation and cleaved by caspase 3 at two sites within the N-terminus [18].

However, in our condition neither proteasomal nor caspase 3 degradation were involved in Mcl-1 inhibition and this strongly supports that BAPTA-AM down-regulates Mcl-1 through translational events.

We therefore analyzed if this effect could imply the canonical PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway that is the most frequently deregulated pathway in high grade serous
ovarian cancer. This pathway is all the more interesting that it is known to regulate Mcl-1 translation and is targeted in this way to sensitize several types of cancer justifying the development of pharmacological PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors [10, 19, 25]. Moreover, potential connections between calcium signaling and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been reported in a number of cell types included ovarian cancer [15, 26, 27]. Results showed that inhibition of Mcl-1 by BAPTA-AM was accompanied by a dramatic p-4E-BP1 and p-p70S6K down-regulation. These proteins are considered as the two most prominent and well-characterized translational regulators activated by mTORC1 and a growing body of evidence suggests that deregulation in protein synthesis has impact on cancer cell survival. In this way, loss of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation has previously been shown to result in a decrease of Mcl-1 protein expression in various cancer types in vitro and in vivo leading to therapeutic benefit [19, 22] and overexpression of eIF4E led to Mcl-1 expression in our models. Our findings suggest that calcium inhibition act on the PI3K/AKT pathway as an mTORC1 inhibitor. This is all the more highlighted because this compound, by inhibiting p70S6K, reactivate PI3K which leads to an increase of p-AKT(thr308). However, our study suggests that calcium inhibition does not act as a classical allosteric mTORC1 inhibitors as rapamycin. Indeed, these latter compounds have been described to poorly inhibit 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and not to target mTORC2 thus leading to an up-regulation of p-AKT(ser473) by a compensatory feedback loop [28]. Yet, p-4E-BP1 expression was strongly inhibited upon BAPTA-AM treatment especially in IGROV1-R10 cells but no increase of p-AKT(ser473) was observed in both ovarian cell lines. This latter result was in agreement with those obtained in human breast cancer cells by Davis FM and coworkers [15]. One could suggest that calcium inhibition act as ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR that block the phosphorylation of all downstream targets of mTORC1 and mTORC2 [29]. However, these compounds are known to strongly inhibit p-AKT(ser473) phosphorylation that it is not observed in our models [30, 31].

Concerning RAS/MEK/ERK network, it is known to interfere with PI3K/AKT pathway and regulate mTORC1 activity [32]. It has also been demonstrated that MAPK inhibition led to Mcl-1 down-regulation that sensitized acute myeloid leukemia to ABT-737 action [9]. However, in our conditions, p-ERK was not decreased upon BAPTA-AM treatment but is increased. This effect could be triggered by a negative feedback loop due to mTORC1 inhibition that hyperactivate RTK/IRS/PI3K pathway as reported by Carracedo et al., [30]. This is suggested in our study by the increase of AKT phosphorylation in Thr308. BAPTA-AM induced ERK phosphorylation could also be triggered by calcium dependent regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase

phosphatases, as proposed by Davis FM and coworkers [15]. ERK was described to either to favor cell proliferation or to trigger cell death depending on cell types and stimulus [33, 34]. However, upon BAPTA-AM+ABT-737-induced apoptosis, ERK phosphorylation returned back to the basal level (data not shown). This result shows that up-regulation of ERK phosphorylation is not required when apoptosis occur and that p-ERK does not seem to have a pro-apoptotic action in our models. This is in agreement with the conclusions we already obtained with BEZ-235 [10] and miR-491-5p [35]. Actually, in these studies p-ERK was shown to prevent apoptotic processes due to its capacity to phosphorylate the pro-apoptotic BH3-only Bim leading to its proteasomal degradation.

One hypothesis that could explain the differential regulation of mTOR and AKT is that mTOR regulation could partially be independent of AKT's one. Conus et al. have shown that calcium regulates differently AKT and p70S6K in Balb/c-3T3 fibroblasts. Actually, they demonstrated that these two kinases are likely to lie on separated pathways with the activation of p70S6K requiring a separate calcium-dependent process [36]. These results were also observed in rat-1 fibroblasts where mTOR and its downstream targets activation were achieved either by PDGF via a classical calcium insensitive PI3K/AKT pathway or by a calcium sensitive phospholipase D/phosphatidic acid pathway [20]. We thus tested if inhibiting PLD could lead to Mcl-1 inhibition. Actually no Mcl-1 expression modification was detected with FIPI in the conditions tested. These treatments modified neither AKT activation nor mTOR, p70S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation (Supp data 3) suggesting that calcium/PLD/mTOR pathway does not seem to be involved in Mcl-1 regulation.

We also tested the potential involvement of Protein Kinase C (PKC) in Mcl-1 down regulation. PKC has been discovered as a calcium and phospholipid dependent serine/threonine-specific protein kinase. The classical PKC isoforms (cPKCs) require calcium for optimal activity. These proteins are involved in several cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival, and they are also important for the establishment and progression of malignant disorders such as cancer [37]. At last, Bryostatin (a macrocyclic lactone) or activation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor were described to induce Mcl-1 expression through PKC activation [37, 38]. To assess the possible involvement of PKC in calcium-mediated Mcl-1 regulation, we treated ovarian carcinoma cells with a specific PKC inhibitor, GF109203X. A dose response and a time course treatments were performed in both cell lines but no modulation of Mcl-1 expression was observed whatever the dose and the time considered suggesting that calcium-regulated Mcl-1 expression does not require PKC activation (data not shown).
We next tested whether calmodulin antagonists as W7 could down-regulate Mcl-1. Calmodulin is one of the major calcium sensor in the cell and plays central role in cell motility, proliferation and apoptosis [21]. Calmodulin is described to interact directly with numerous proteins as mTOR [39] or AKT [40]. The results obtained showed that W7 decreases Mcl-1 expression and mTOR targets activation in both cell lines. mTOR regulation by calmodulin was often described and molecular mechanisms were elegantly decipher by Gulati [39]. In this study, authors demonstrated that amino acids triggered a rise of [Ca²⁺]ᵢ from extracellular stores that bound calmodulin. Thereafter, this complex bound a class III PI3K (human vacuolar protein sorting 34, called hVps34) through its conserved calmodulin-binding motif which triggered mTOR complex activation. It is noteworthy that, like in our study, BAPTA-AM was able to inhibit p70S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylations but had no effect on AKT (ser473). It could be hypothesized that similar events occur in ovarian carcinoma cells. As enforced Mcl-1 expression protects from W7 + ABT-737 or BAPTA-AM+ABT-737 apoptosis, this anti-apoptotic protein could be considered as one of the calcium and calmodulin target.

The comparison of W7 effect in the 2 ovarian cell lines tested revealed that W7 differently regulate AKT phosphorylation. Actually, whereas W7 does not modify AKT activation in SKOV3 cells, it strongly decreased phosphorylation of AKT expression in IGROV1-R10 cells. Similar results were also obtained by Coticchia et al., in breast carcinoma cells [41]. In this study, authors found that EGF-induced AKT activation was dependent on calmodulin in the majority of human breast cancer cell lines. However, in some cases this effect did not occur. In their study, this discrepancy partially depends on the basal level of activated AKT because enforced expression of AKT reduced the effect of W7 expression. This does not seem to be the case in our study because basal level of AKT (Thr308) and (Ser473) are higher in IGROV1-R10 cell lines than in SKOV3 (cf [10]). They also found that forced overexpression of EGFR and ErbB2 partially restores calmodulin-dependent AKT signaling suggesting that EGFR status could explained this discrepancy. However, both ovarian carcinoma cell lines express similar EGFR basal level (data not shown). These hypotheses could not then explain the difference of sensitivity in the cells lines tested and further researches are required to decipher the molecular events involved. However it is important to note that whatever was the sensitivity of AKT to W7 in breast cancer cell lines tested, BAPTA-AM treatment was never able to inhibit AKT activation [41].

A plausible hypothesis that explains why AKT is sensitive to calmodulin and not BAPTA-AM is that its activation could be mediated via the action of a calcium-

independent calmodulin (apo-calmodulin) in IGROV1-R10. Actually, apo-calmodulin is a protein that differs from calcium-bound calmodulin in its tertiary structure, and like calcium-bound form, is known to be involved in functions vital to cellular life. These results are not however in agreement with Deb TB and coworkers study where BAPTA-AM and W7 both inhibit EGF-induced AKT (ser473) phosphorylation, suggesting that in MYC83cells, unlike IGROV1-R10 cells, AKT activation is mediated via a calcium-dependent calmodulin. This discrepancy highlights that calcium-mediated AKT regulation is specific to each cell type tested.

Ca²⁺/calmodulin complex is known to activate many cellular effectors including Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CamKII), calmodulin kinase kinases (CamKK) or AKT [21]. To find molecular intermediate between Ca²⁺/calmodulin complex and Mcl-1, we first evaluated if CamKII could be involved in Mcl-1 expression. Actually, this kinase was involved in Mcl-1 regulation in a model of prostate carcinoma cells [17]. Results presented in Supp data 4 revealed that KN93 has a modest effect on Mcl-1 and has a modest effect on AKT phosphorylation leading to the conclusion that a calcium/calmodulin/CAMKII pathway does not seem to be involved in Mcl-1 regulation in the conditions tested. This is not in agreement with Ma S. study where CamKIINβ, an endogenous inhibitor of CamKII was found to down-regulate AKT (Ser 473) expression in HO-8910PM ovarian cancer cells. A hypothesis that could explain this discrepancy is that we treated our cells only for 6 h and it could not be ruled out that KN93 decreases AKT phosphorylation for longer time of treatment (24, 48 and 72 h) as presented by Ma S. and coworkers with CamKIINβ. Moreover CamKIINβ is possibly more specific to CamKII than KN93 is, explaining AKT ser473 stronger inhibition.

Finally, CAMKK inhibition with STO-609 did not down-regulate Mcl-1 expression suggesting that these kinases were not implicated in calcium/calmodulin-mediated Mcl-1 up-regulation (data not shown).

We previously demonstrated that ovarian carcinoma cells are addicted to Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 anti-apoptotic members and that these two proteins cooperate to compromise chemosensitivity. Actually silencing these proteins with siRNA is sufficient to eradicate ovarian carcinoma cells without the requirement of chemotherapy [5, 8]. Targeting Mcl-1 is all the more crucial that ABT-737 (a powerful Bcl-xL inhibitor which is a potential candidate for clinic use) is not only unable to target this protein but also increases Mcl-1 expression inducing by this way its own chemoresistance. Actually, calcium has a strong impact on cellular fate and calcium signaling is often deregulated during carcinogenesis. Moreover, calcium pathway has already been described to regulate Mcl-1 in other types of
cancer [16, 17] and this study suggests that Mcl-1 is also regulated by calcium signaling in ovarian carcinoma cells. To comfort these findings overexpression of 4E-BP1 target: eIF4E (eukaryotic translation Initiator Factor 4E) increased Mcl-1 expression and rescued ovarian carcinoma cells from calcium signaling inhibitors + ABT-737-induced apoptosis suggesting that Mcl-1 is crucial for ovarian carcinoma cell survival and that calcium signals act partially through mTORC1 pathway.

The universality of calcium signaling leads to think that
targeting calcium would have major effects on all cell
types and have not its place for molecular targeted therapy.
Actually, a misconception is that calcium is often seen as a
simple switch to trigger cellular responses. However, it
appears that according to the cell line tested, modulating
calcium does not have the same consequence on AKT/
mTOR and ERK activation which supports that calcium
signaling is specific to cancer cells type. What could
explain these differences is that calcium signaling ensues
from channels and pumps that specifically regulate cellular
processes controlled by calcium and many of these calcium
toolkits exhibit specific tissue distribution and their alter-
ation are considered as cancer signatures [42, 43]. Actually,
an elegant work from Dubois et al. [44] demonstrated that
prostate cancer can undergo an oncogenic switch due to an
increase in ORAI3 expression. This alteration modified the
nature of the calcium channel from a store-operated cal-
cium channel (constituted of ORAI1 subunits) to an ara-
chidonic acid-regulated one (ARC channel—constituted of
ORAI1/3 subunits) leading to increased proliferation and
apoptotic resistance promotion [44]. In a similar way, the
nature of TRP calcium channels expression is correlated to
clinical parameters in breast cancer. Indeed, the expression
of TRPM8 is significantly associated with low histological
grade tumors and could be considered as a good prognostic
marker; by contrast, TRPV6 overexpression is correlated
with high-grade tumors and is regarded as a marker of poor
prognosis [42, 45]. Concerning ovarian carcinoma cells,
TRPV6, TRPC3 and T-type calcium channel are found to
be overexpressed leading to think that these proteins could
be considered as therapeutic targets [13, 46, 47]. It is thus
possible that according to the calcium toolkits expressed in
cancer cells types, calcium signals could differs in ampli-
tude and frequency leading to activation of specific calcium
effectors and specific cellular responses.

One interesting thing described by Dziegielewska and coworkers is that calcium channels inhibitors could be therapeutically beneficial when combined with standard cytotoxic chemo- or radiotherapy. Thus already commercialized calcium inhibitors could be diverted to be used in chemotherapy. In this regard, clinical trial combining Mibefradil Dihydrochloride (a known antihypertensive

drug) and Temozolomide has been approved for treating
patients with recurrent glioma (NCT01480050) [48].

Taken together, we found that calcium signaling regu-
lates Mcl-1 through translational events and a calmodulin-
mediated pathway. BAPTA-AM and calmodulin inhibitor
combination with ABT-737 leads to apoptosis, a process
that is reversed by Mcl-1 enforced expression. As Mcl-1
represents a crucial hurdle to the success of chemotherapy,
these results could open to new area of investigation using
calcium modulators to directly or indirectly target Mcl-1
and thus efficiently sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to
anti-Bcl-xL strategies.

**Acknowledgments** We acknowledge Marilyne Guillamin (Flow cytometry core facility, SF 4206 ICORE, University of Caen) for her helpful technical support. Acquisition of the xCELLigence real-time activity measurement system has been supported by European Community (FEDER) and the Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse.

**Conflict of interest** The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

**References**

1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144:646–674

2. Juin P, Geneste O, Gautier F, Depil S, Campone M (2013) Decoding and unlocking the BCL-2 dependency of cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 13:455–465

3. Shigemasa K, Katoh O, Shiroyama Y et al (2002) Increased MCL-1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res 93:542–550

4. Villedieu M, Louis MH, Dutoit S et al (2007) Absence of Bcl-xL down-regulation in response to cisplatin is associated with chemo-resistance in ovarian carcinoma cells. Gynecol Oncol 105:31–44

5. Brotin E, Meryet-Figuiere M, Simonin K et al (2010) Bcl-XL and MCL-1 constitute pertinent targets in ovarian carcinoma and their concomitant inhibition is sufficient to induce apoptosis. Int. J. Cancer 126:885–895

6. Oltersdorf T, Elmore SW, Shoemaker AR et al (2005) An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Nature 435:677–681

7. van Delft MF, Wei AH, Mason KD et al (2006) The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 targets selective Bcl-2 proteins and efficiently induces apoptosis via Bak/Bax if Mcl-1 is neutralized. Cancer Cell 10:389–399

8. Simonin K, N'diaye M, Lheureux S et al (2013) Platinum compounds sensitize ovarian carcinoma cells to ABT-737 by modulation of the Mcl-1/Noxa axis. Apoptosis 18:492–508

9. Konopleva M, Milella M, Ruvolo P et al (2012) MEK inhibition enhances ABT-737-induced leukemia cell apoptosis via prevention of ERK-activated MCL-1 induction and modulation of MCL-1/BIM complex. Leukemia 26:778–787
10. Jebahi A, Villedieu M, Petigny C et al (2014) PI3 K/mTOR dual inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 decreases Mcl-1 expression and sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to Bcl-x-targeting strategies, provided that Bim expression is induced. Cancer Lett

11. Carracedo A, Baselga J (2008) Pandolfi PP. Deconstructing feedback-signaling networks to improve anticancer therapy with mTORC1 inhibitors. Cell Cycle 7:3805–3809

12. Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y (2013) Targeting Ca(2+)(+) transport in cancer: close reality or long perspective? Expert Opin Ther Targets 17:225–241

13. Yang SL, Cao Q, Zhou KC, Feng YJ, Wang YZ (2009) Transient receptor potential channel C3 contributes to the progression of human ovarian cancer. Oncogene 28:1320–1328

14. Wilson BE, Mochon E, Boxer LM (1996) Induction of bcl-2 expression by phosphorylated CREB proteins during B-cell activation and rescue from apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 16:5546–5556

15. Davis FM, Azimi I, Faville RA et al (2013) Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in breast cancer cells is calcium signal dependent. Oncogene

16. Jiang CC, Lucas K, Avery-Kiejda KA et al (2008) Up-regulation of Mcl-1 is critical for survival of human melanoma cells upon endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Res 68:6708–6717

17. Rokhlin OW, Guseva NV, Taghiyev AF, Glover RA, Cohen MB (2010) KN-93 inhibits androgen receptor activity and induces cell death irrespective of p53 and Akt status in prostate cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 9:224–235

18. Thomas LW, Lam C, Edwards SW (2010) Mcl-1; the molecular regulation of protein function. FEBS Lett 584:2981–2989

19. Mills JR, Hippo Y, Robert F et al (2008) mTORC1 promotes survival through translational control of Mcl-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:10853–10858

20. Ballou LM, Jiang YP, Du G, Frohman MA, Lin RZ (2003) Ca(2 +)- and phospholipase D-dependent and -independent pathways activate mTOR signaling. FEBS Lett 550:51–56

21. Berchtold MW, Villalobo A (2014) The many faces of calmodulin in cell proliferation, programmed cell death, autophagy, and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:398–435

22. Hsieh AC, Costa M, Zollo O et al (2010) Genetic dissection of the oncogenic mTOR pathway reveals druggable addiction to translational control via 4EBP-1cF4E. Cancer Cell 17:249–261

23. Preuss E, Hugle M, Reimann R, Schlecht M, Fulda S (2013) Panmammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor AZD8055 primes rhabdomyosarcoma cells for ABT-737-induced apoptosis by down-regulating Mcl-1 protein. J Biol Chem 288:35287–35296

24. Lucas KM, Mohana-Kumaran N, Lau D et al (2012) Modulation of NOXA and MCL-1 as a strategy for sensitizing melanoma cells to the BH3-mimetic ABT-737. Clin Cancer Res 18:783–795

25. Hahnel PS, Thaler S, Antunes E, Huber C, Theobald M, Schuler M (2008) Targeting AKT signaling sensitizes cancer to cellular immunotherapy. Cancer Res 68:3899–3906

26. Ma S, Yang Y, Wang C et al (2009) Endogenous human CaMKII inhibitory protein suppresses tumor growth by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through down-regulation of the phosphatidylinoside 3-kinase/Akt/HDM2 pathway. J Biol Chem 284: 24773–24782

27. Deb TB, Coticchia CM, Dickson RB (2004) Calmodulin-mediated activation of Akt regulates survival of c-Myc-overexpressing mouse mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 279:38903–38911

28. Breuleux M, Klopfenstein M, Stephan C et al (2009) Increased AKT S473 phosphorylation after mTORC1 inhibition is rictor dependent and does not predict tumor cell response to PI3 K/mTOR inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther 8:742–753

29. Feldman ME, Apsel B, Uotila A et al (2009) Active-site inhibitors of mTOR target rapamycin-resistant outputs of mTORC1 and mTORC2. PLoS Biol 7:e38

30. Carracedo A, Ma L, Teruya-Feldstein J et al (2008) Inhibition of mTORC1 leads to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3 K-dependent feedback loop in human cancer. J Clin Invest 118:3065–3074

31. Laplante M, Sabatini DM (2012) mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149:274–293

32. Fruman DA, Rommel C (2014) PI3 K and cancer: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:140–156

33. Kohno M, Pouyssegur J (2006) Targeting the ERK signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Ann Med 38:200–211

34. Cagnol S, Chambard JC (2010) ERK and cell death: mechanisms of ERK-induced cell death–apoptosis, autophagy and senescence. FEBS J 277:2–21

35. Denoyelle C, Lambert B, Meryet-Figuiere M et al (2014) miR-491-5p-induced apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma depends on the direct inhibition of both BCL-XL and EGFR leading to BIM activation. Cell Death Dis 5:e1445

36. Conus NM, Hemmings BA, Pearson RB (1998) Differential regulation by calcium reveals distinct signaling requirements for the activation of Akt and p70S6k. J Biol Chem 273:4776–4782

37. Thomas A, Pepper C, Hoy T, Bentley P (2004) Bryostatin induces protein kinase C modulation, Mcl-1 up-regulation and phosphorylation of Bcl-2 resulting in cellular differentiation and resistance to drug-induced apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma 45:997–1008

38. Rutherford C, Childs S, Ohotski J et al (2013) Regulation of cell survival by sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1P1 via reciprocal ERK-dependent suppression of Bim and PI-3-kinase/protein kinase C-mediated upregulation of Mcl-1. Cell Death Dis 4:e927

39. Gulati P, Gaspers LD, Dann SG et al (2008) Amino acids activate mTOR complex 1 via Ca2+/CaM signaling to hVps34. Cell Metab 7:456–465

40. Dong B, Valencia CA, Liu R (2007) Ca(2 +)/calmodulin directly interacts with the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1. J Biol Chem 282:25131–25140

41. Coticchia CM, Revankar CM, Deb TB, Dickson RB, Johnson MD (2009) Calmodulin modulates Akt activity in human breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:545–560

42. Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Dhennin-Duthille I, Gautier M, Sevestre H, Ahidouch A (2013) TRP channels: diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for breast cancer? Trends Mol Med 19:117–124

43. Stewart TA, Yapa KT, Monteith GR (2014) Altered calcium signaling in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta

44. Dubois C, Vanden Abeele F, Lehen'kyi V et al (2014) Remodeling of channel-forming ORAI proteins determines an oncogenic switch in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 26:19–32

45. Prevarskaya N, Ouadid-Ahidouch H, Skryma R, Shuba Y (2014) Remodelling of Ca2 + transport in cancer: how it contributes to cancer hallmarks? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130097

46. Lehen'kyi V, Raphael M, Prevarskaya N (2012) The role of the TRPV6 channel in cancer. J Physiol 590:1369–1376

47. Li W, Zhang SL, Wang N, Zhang BB, Li M (2011) Blockade of T-type Ca(2+) channels inhibits human ovarian cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Invest 29:339–346

48. Dziegielewska B, Gray LS, Dziegielewski J (2014) T-type calcium channels blockers as new tools in cancer therapies. Pflug Arch 466:801–810