# Diversity of the Bacterial and Fungal Microflora from the Midgut and Cuticle of Phlebotomine Sand Flies Collected in North-Western Iran

Mohammad Akhoundi, Rounak Bakhtiari, Thomas Guillard, Ahmad Baghaei, Reza Tolouei, Denis Sereno, Dominique Toubas, Jérôme Depaquit, Mehdi Razzaghi Abyaneh

► To cite this version:

Mohammad Akhoundi, Rounak Bakhtiari, Thomas Guillard, Ahmad Baghaei, Reza Tolouei, et al. Diversity of the Bacterial and Fungal Microflora from the Midgut and Cuticle of Phlebotomine Sand Flies Collected in North-Western Iran. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (11), pp.e50259. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050259. hal-03113163

HAL Id: hal-03113163

https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-03113163

Submitted on 18 Jan 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Diversity of the Bacterial and Fungal Microflora from the Midgut and Cuticle of Phlebotomine Sand Flies Collected in North-Western Iran

Mohammad Akhoundi¹,², Rounak Bakhtiari³, Thomas Guillard⁴,⁷, Ahmad Baghaei², Reza Tolouei², Denis Sereno⁵, Dominique Toubas⁶,⁸, Jérôme Depaquit¹*, Mehdi Razzaghi Abyaneh²

¹Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, ANSES, EA4688 - USC, Transmission Vectorielle et Epidémiosurveillance de Maladies Parasitaires (VECPAR), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculté de Pharmacie, Reims, France, ²Mycology and Parasitology Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran, ³Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health and Institute Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, ⁴UFR Médecine, SFR CAP-Santé (FED 4231), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France, ⁵MIVEGEC, UMR IRD 224-CNRS 5290-UM1-UM2, Montpellier, France, ⁶Unité MEDyC, FRE 3481 URCA CNRS, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France, ⁷Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU de Reims, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France, ⁸Laboratoire de Parasitologie Mycologie, CHU de Reims, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Reims, France

## Abstract

**Background:** Phlebotomine sand flies are the vectors of the leishmaniases, parasitic diseases caused by *Leishmania* spp. Little is known about the prevalence and diversity of sand fly microflora colonizing the midgut or the cuticle. Particularly, there is little information on the fungal diversity. This information is important for development of vector control strategies.

**Methodology/Principal Findings:** Five sand fly species: *Phlebotomus papatasi*, *P. sergenti*, *P. kandelakii*, *P. perfiliewi* and *P. halepensis* were caught in Bileh Savar and Kaleybar in North-Western Iran that are located in endemic foci of visceral leishmaniasis. A total of 35 specimens were processed. Bacterial and fungal strains were identified by routine microbiological methods. We characterized 39 fungal isolates from the cuticle and/or the midgut. They belong to six different genera including *Penicillium* (17 isolates), *Aspergillus* (14), *Acremonium* (5), *Fusarium* (1), *Geotrichum* (1) and *Candida* (1). We identified 33 Gram-negative bacteria: *Serratia marcescens* (9 isolates), *Enterobacter cloacae* (6), *Pseudomonas fluorescens* (6), *Klebsiella ozaenae* (4), *Acinetobacter sp.* (3), *Escherichia coli* (3), *Asaia sp.* (1) and *Pantoea sp.* (1) as well as Gram-positive bacteria *Bacillus subtilis* (5) and *Micrococcus luteus* (5) in 10 isolates.

**Conclusion/Significance:** Our study provides new data on the microbiotic diversity of field-collected sand flies and for the first time, evidence of the presence of *Asaia* sp. in sand flies. We have also found a link between physiological stages (unfed, fresh fed, semi gravid and gravid) of sand flies and number of bacteria that they carry. Interestingly *Pantoea* sp. and *Klebsiella ozaenae* have been isolated in Old World sand fly species. The presence of latter species on sand fly cuticle and in the female midgut suggests a role for this arthropod in dissemination of these pathogenic bacteria in endemic areas. Further experiments are required to clearly delineate the vectorial role (passive or active) of sand flies.

**Citation:** Akhoundi M, Bakhtiari R, Guillard T, Baghaei A, Tolouei R, et al. (2012) Diversity of the Bacterial and Fungal Microflora from the Midgut and Cuticle of Phlebotomine Sand Flies Collected in North-Western Iran. PLoS ONE 7(11): e50259. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259

**Editor:** Sudha Chaturvedi, Wadsworth Center, United States of America

**Received** July 11, 2012; **Accepted** October 17, 2012; **Published** November 30, 2012

**Copyright:** © 2012 Akhoundi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

**Funding:** No current external funding sources for this study.

**Competing Interests:** The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: jerome.depaquit@univ-reims.fr

## Introduction

Phlebotomine sand flies are the natural exclusive vectors of leishmaniases, a group of parasitic diseases caused by protozoan kinetoplastid flagellates belonging to the genus *Leishmania*. They affect about 12 million people in many countries located in Mediterranean, tropical and sub-tropical regions [1,2].

Sand flies harbor a huge variety of microorganisms, and not all are resident in the gut [3]. They can also originate from the sand flies' external environment. In nature, adult Phlebotomine sand flies can colonize highly divergent environments e.g. tropical forests, temperate regions and deserts, in wild, domestic or anthropized biotopes. Adult sand flies usually remain close (less than one kilometer) from their larval development sites [4]. The

sites where larval development take place are usually a mixture of animal faeces and mud which are found in both wild (rodent burrows, forest floors, caves) and anthropized biotopes (villages, animal shelters) [5,6]. Larvae feed on the decomposing organic materials in these sites and the adults can therefore acquire a part of their microflora during their larval development. Furthermore, male and female sand flies feed daily on natural sugars, especially nectars or sap secretions and drink water from plants [7]. These sugars are the main source of carbohydrates for adults. Additionally, females require a blood-meal to complement their diet, during the maturation of their eggs and completion of the gonotrophic cycle [8,9,10]. During these feeding events, they can also acquire various microorganisms including bacteria (e.g. *Bartonella bacilliformis*), fungi, Phleboviruses or other trypanosomatidae and co-colonization by
human pathogenic and non pathogenic species of *Leishmania* i.e. *L. turanica*, *L. gerbilli* and *L. major* [11,12]. Beside the lumen of the gut, the diversity of microorganism present on the cuticle that is acquired independently of their breeding, feeding and resting places might also be highly informative for sand fly biology.

The majority of studies dealing with the microflora that colonizes gut of hematophagous insects were performed on mosquitoes [13]. However, very little is known about sand fly microflora and its' possible impact on the biology (including longevity), reproduction and sand fly-pathogen interaction. This information is important for the development of new strategies for vector control. To date, a few investigations focused on the midgut bacterial flora have been carried out on *Lutzomyia longipalpis*, *Phlebotomus papatasi*, *P. tobbi*, *P. argentipes*, *P. duboscqi* and *Sergentomyia* spp. only [14,15,16,17,18,19,20].

Visceral leishmaniasis or Kala-azar, is a life-threatening parasitic infection, caused by *L. infantum* in Iran. The two provinces of Azarbaijan-e-sharqi and Ardabil used in the present study are two out of four main endemic foci of VL in Iran. Two others including Fars and Bushehr provinces are located in the south of the country. Several investigations have been carried out on the population composition and *Leishmania* infection of sand flies in different localities within these provinces. *P. perfiliewi* *transcaucasicus* and *P. kandelakii* have been reported as the proven vectors of VL in Azarbaijan-e-sharqi and Ardabil [21,22]. Parvizi et al. 2008 [23] and Sanei Dehkordi et al. 2011 [24] have reported *P. perfiliewi* as the proven vector of VL in Kaleybar and Bileh Savar counties.

The aim of our study was to investigate the diversity of the microbial flora including bacteria and fungi that colonize both the cuticle and midgut in wild populations of sand flies through a culture dependent methodology. Specimens of sand flies investigated were prevalent in the endemic foci of visceral leishmaniasis in North-Western Iran and are representative of the sand fly diversity in this area.

# Materials and Methods

## Study Area

Sampling was carried out in August 2011 from rural regions of Kaleybar (38°58′ N 47°13′ E) and Bileh Savar (39°03′ N 48°31′ E) in Azarbaijan Sharqi and Ardabil provinces. These provinces are well-known endemic foci of visceral leishmaniasis in North-Western Iran. Five CDC miniature light traps were used in each sampling site and placed in houses, animal shelters, yards and rodents' burrows. All light traps were sterilized by ethanol full spraying just before use and installed before sunset and remained functional throughout the night until the next morning.

## Processing of Phlebotomine Sand Flies

Sand flies caught alive were processed individually using sterile single-use materials and reagents as summarized in the Figure 1. Sand flies were killed using cold shock (I) and males and females, subdivided in unfed, fresh fed (having red fresh blood non digested in their gut), semi gravid (having some eggs and a part of digested dark red to brown blood in their gut) and gravid specimens (with an abdomen full of eggs), were processed individually according the following protocol. Each individual sand fly was placed in a 1.5 ml microtube containing 30 µl PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline). Samples were mildly vortex for 1 minute (II) and then 15 µl of the PBS was taken for bacterial isolation (III) and another 15 µl of the PBS for fungal characterization (IV) of the cuticle microflora. Each sand fly specimen was then transferred using sterile entomological micro needles to a new sterile microtube

containing 30 µl absolute ethanol (V). After 1 min of mild vortex mixing (VI), the sand fly specimens were transferred to a new sterile microtube and washed with 30 µl of PBS (VII). After vortexing as previously described (VIII), 15 µl of the PBS was used for bacterial analysis (IX) and 15 µl for fungal analysis (X) in order to check the sterilization of the cuticle. The sand flies were then removed from the microtubes and dissected under a stereomicroscope on a sterile microscopic slide with a drop of sterile PBS using sterile entomological micro needles. After the sand fly's head was removed, the digestive tract was isolated on the microscopic slide (XI), washed with 30 µl PBS into a new sterile microtube (XII), and crushed using a glass pestle (XIII). Then, 15 µl of the PBS was used for bacterial analysis (XIV) and 15 µl for fungal analysis (XV) of the gut microflora.

## Mycological Identification

The PBS extracts from the cuticle and gut (IV and XV) were diluted with PBS to give a final volume of 100 µl and these diluted solutions were spread on to Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (Peptone 1%, Glucose 2%, Agar-agar 1.5%; Merck, Germany) and Potato Dextrose Agar (Potato infusion 20%, Dextrose 2%, Agar 2%) plates and incubated for 2 weeks at 25°C. The plates were periodically checked for fungal colonies. Identification of fungal isolates was performed according to a combination of macro- and microscopic morphology. Yeasts were identified by the use of the chromogenic medium Chromagar Candida ID2 (BioMérieux, France).

## Bacterial Identification

The 15 µl PBS solutions from steps III and XIV were also diluted to a final volume of 100 µl by the addition of PBS. Fifty µl of each were then used for a bacterial colony count assessment. To determine the number of colony forming units (CFU), the samples were serially diluted 10 times (from 1¹ to 1¹⁰) and aliquots of 100 µl were transferred on the PCA: Plate Count Agar (105463, E. Merck Co.; Darmstadt, Germany). Plates were then incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Total colony counts were recorded for each dilution and the average for every sample was calculated.

The remaining 50 µl of each starting extract was then transferred into BHI broth (Brain Heart Infusion broth) medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Then, bacteria were plated on BHI agar, XLD (Xylose-Lysine-Desoxycholate), Hektoen enteric agar, MacConkey agar and blood agar media containing Amphotericin B (2 µg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hours.

The initial identification of bacterial species was based on the colony characteristics (involving colony size, shape, color, margin, opacity, elevation and consistency) and the morphology of isolates based on Gram's staining procedure.

Finally, the API identification kit (API 20E, BioMerieux) was used for final identification of Gram-negative bacteria. The identification of Gram-positive bacteria was performed using the API Staph, API 20 Strep and API50CH B following the manufacturer's recommendations.

## Statistical Analysis

Pearson Chi-Square and Scheffe's tests based on the colony counting was performed using SPSS software ver. 18 to detect statistical differences in bacterial populations isolated from cuticle and midgut of (i) *P. papatasi* versus all other species using Pearson Chi-Square test and (ii) to compare males with unfed females, unfed females with freshly fed females, freshly fed females with semi-gravid females and semi-gravid females with gravid females using Scheffe's test.
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Preparation steps of the sand fly processing for fungal and bacterial analyses. *: include primary volume (15 µl) which were diluted up to 100 µl for microbial assessments.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.g001</figcaption></figure>

## Results

### Prevalence of Micro-organisms in Field Caught Sand Flies

The aim of the study was to investigate the diversity of the bacterial and fungal strains that Phlebotomine sand flies carry with a culture dependent method. A total of 35 sand flies, 9 males and 26 females, belonging to five species (*P. papatasi*, *P. sergenti*, *P. kandelakii*, *P. perfiliewi* and *P. halepensis*) were collected. Sand flies were trapped in two different habitats, animal shelter (21) and outdoors (14). Samples were dissected and microorganisms were collected according to the procedure described in Figure 1. The sterilization efficiency was controlled during the whole procedure, see step VIII in Figure 1 and all samples correctly controlled (without any bacterial and fungal growing) for this step were included in the study and processed further. This methodology allowed us to readily isolate and identify the microorganisms present on the cuticle of the insect and those colonizing their midgut. Among the 35 processed sand flies, only 4 of them (3 males and 1 female) were negative for both bacteria and fungi on their cuticle or in their midgut. Among the 31 sand flies that bore microorganisms, slightly more microorganisms could be isolated from the cuticle than from their midgut. Interestingly, fungi were

isolated more frequently on the cuticle than in the midgut and conversely bacteria were isolated more frequently from midgut than from cuticle (see Figure 2). Surprisingly, 37% of the midgut samples obtained from *P. papatasi* carried at least one fungal species whereas 63% of the cuticle samples originating from *P. papatasi* bore at least one fungal species. Such differences were not observed for the cuticle nor when looking at the presence of bacteria on the cuticle or in the sand fly midgut (see Figure 3). No differences were observed between males and females (data not shown), although this can not be statistically evaluated, because of the low number of male samples processed (9) as compared to females (26). The proportion of sand flies carrying no, one or multiple microorganisms (bacteria and/or fungi) in their midgut appears to be roughly the same (see Figure 4). By contrast, we observed that mono infection by bacteria and/or fungi is more frequent than no or multiple infection at the level of their cuticle. Finally, among the processed females, more bacterial strains are present on the cuticle and in the midgut of gravid compared to other physiological stages. The prevalence of bacteria increased progressively (except on the cuticle of semi-gravid females) with the advancement of the gonotrophic cycle (see Table 1).
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Mean number of bacteria and fungi isolated from cuticle or midgut of sand flies. These microorganisms were processed as described in the material and methods and the diversity of bacteria and fungi was ascertained by culture dependent methods. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.g002</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Frequency of bacterial or fungal isolation from the midgut or the cuticle of sand flies. *P. papatasi* appears on the left panel, and of the other species tested, on the right panel (i. e. *P. sergenti*, *P. perfiliewi*, *P. kandelakii* and *P. halepensis*). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.g003</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Mean number of sand flies carrying no, one or multiple microorganisms on their cuticle or midgut.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.g004</figcaption></figure>

## Mean Number of Bacterial Colonies Per Individuals

The individual results are presented in Table 1. Because the number of sampled sand flies is not in equilibrium (include more *P. papatasi* than all other species), we have analyzed the data in two groups: *P. papatasi* (n = 19) and species belonging to another species (n = 16).

First of all, cuticle and midgut isolated from *P. papatasi* produced a significantly, lower number of colonies than the other species for cuticle (<chi>2 = 1592, P<0.05) and midgut (<chi>2 = 11500, P<0.05) respectively.

In addition, the average number of colonies obtained from cuticle of *P. papatasi* was higher in females than males and depended on the physiological state of the insects, the semi gravid females producing a higher number of colonies (2.6×10² for the males and 2.6×10³ for the freshly fed females, 2×10⁴ for the semi-gravid females and 2.6×10⁴ for the gravid ones). The same trends were observed for the other species (mean = 3×10² for the males, 3.5×10² for the unfed females, 1×10³ for the freshly fed females, 1.7×10⁴ for the semi-gravid females and 3×10⁴ for the gravid ones). A similar observation performed on the midgut of *P. papatasi* showed that the numbers of colonies were: 1.5×10² for the males, 3×10² for the unfed females, 2.7×10³ for the freshly fed females, 1.8×10⁴ for the semi-gravid females and 2×10⁵ for the gravid ones. By comparison the colonies obtained for the other species were: 1.1×10³ for the males, 3×10³ for the unfed females, 3×10³ for the semi-gravid females and 8.7×10⁴ for the gravid ones. Differences in quantities of bacteria in males and the different physiological stages of females were also analyzed using Scheffe's test. There was no significant differences in the numbers of colonies derived from the cuticle of *P. papatasi* and other groups for males-unfed females, unfed-freshly fed physiological stages (P>0.0125) whereas they were significant for freshly fed-semi gravid and semi gravid-gravid (P<0.0125).

There were no significant differences in bacterial colonies isolated from the midgut for males-unfed, unfed-freshly fed, freshly

fed-semi gravid physiological stages (P>0.0125) and only it was significant between semi gravid and gravid females (P<0.0125).

It seems therefore that species, sex and physiology have some influences on the bacterial colonization of the cuticle and the midgut of sand flies.

## Diversity of Micro-organisms Isolated

A total of 39 fungal strains belonging to six genera and 43 bacterial strains were isolated from the 35 processed Phlebotomine sand flies. *Penicillium* (17 isolates) and *Aspergillus* (14 isolates) occurred more frequently in sand flies than the other genera that were present, i.e. *Acremonium* (5 isolates), and *Fusarium* (1 isolate), *Geotrichum* (1 isolate) and *Candida* (1 isolate) (Figure 5).

The *Penicillium* genera isolated in the present study showed different morphological features, suggesting that three different species were present but we were unable to identify at the species level. Consequently, we called them *Penicillium* sp.1, *Penicillium* sp.2 and *Penicillium* sp.3 respectively.

The bacterial isolates corresponded to ten bacterial taxa: *Serratia marcescens* (9 isolates), *Pseudomonas fluorescens* (6 isolates), *Klebsiella ozaenae* (4 isolates), *Acinetobacter* sp. (3 isolates), *Bacillus subtilis* (5 isolates) and *Micrococcus luteus* (5 isolates) isolated from both cuticle and midgut. *Enterobacter cloacae* (6 isolates) and *Escherichia coli* (3 isolates) as well as *Candida albicans* were isolated only from midgut whereas some other were specifically isolated from the cuticle like the bacteria belonging to *Asaia* sp. (1 isolate) and *Pantea* sp. (1 isolate) as well as the fungi including *Geotrichum* and *Fusarium* (see Figure 5).

## Discussion

In Phlebotomine sand flies, studies carried out on the gut flora of the wild or laboratory reared *Lutzomyia longipalpis*, *P. papatasi*, *P. tobbi*, *P. argentipes*, *P. duboscqi* and *Sergentomyia* spp. have demonstrated the presence of huge diversity of bacterial strains that
<table><caption>Table 1. Synthesis of the average number of bacteria (plain) and fungal (bold) strains from the cuticle and the midgut of sand flies, according to sex, species and habitats.</caption><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>County</th><th>Habitat</th><th>No.</th><th>Cuticle</th><th>M</th><th>F</th><th>UnFed</th><th>Freshly Fed</th><th>Semi Gravid</th><th>Gravid</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="10">P. papatasi</td><td>Bileh Savar (Goon Papagh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>Pantoea sp.(-)<br>neg.</td><td>Micrococcus luteus (+)<br>Aspergillus sp.</td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus subtilis (+)</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1 Aspergillus terreus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-) neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus nidulans<br>Klebsiella ozaena (-)<br>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Gog Tapeh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>Serratia marcescens (-) neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-) neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus nidulans<br>Klebsiella ozaena (-)<br>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus subtilis (+)</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1<br>Aspergillus fumigatus</td><td>Acinetobacter sp. (-)<br>Klebsiella ozaena (-) neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.2</td><td>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>Penicillium sp.2</td></tr><tr><td>Kaleybar (Khane Khosro)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>4</td><td></td><td>4</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1<br>Aspergillus fumigatus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>Micrococcus luteus (+) neg.</td></tr><tr><td>Micrococcus luteus (+)</td><td>Outdoor</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>Micrococcus luteus (+) neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>P. sergenti</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>Asaia sp. (-) Penicillium sp.1<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Goon Papagh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Gog Tapeh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Khane Khosro)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>P. kandelakii</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">P. perfiliawi</td><td>Bileh Savar (Goon Papagh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>2</td><td></td><td>2</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Gog Tapeh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Kaleybar (Khane Khosro)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Goon Papagh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3">P. halepensis</td><td>Bileh Savar (Gog Tapeh)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Bileh Savar (Khane Khosro)</td><td>A.Sh</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>3</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>Bacillus subtilis (+)<br>neg.</td><td>Serratia marcescens (-) Penicillium sp.3</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Outdoor</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>35</td><td>0.56<br>0.44</td><td>0.33<br>0.33</td><td>0.50<br>0.67</td><td>0.43<br>0.57</td><td>0.57<br>0.71</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table 1. Extended.</caption><thead><tr><th colspan="2">Midgut</th><th colspan="2">Average number of microorganisms (CFU<sup>a</sup>)</th><th colspan="2">Average number of microorganisms (CFU<sup>a</sup>)</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>M</th><th>F</th><th>UF</th><th>FF</th><th>SG</th><th>G</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2×10<sup>4</sup></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>Serratia marcescens (-)<br>Bacillus subtilis (+)<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>2×10<sup>3</sup><br>4×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3×10<sup>2</sup></td><td>2×10<sup>4</sup></td><td>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>neg.</td><td>Bacillus subtilis (+)<br>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>neg.</td><td></td><td>neg.<br>Aspergillus sp.</td><td>1×10<sup>2</sup><br>3×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2×10<sup>3</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>Acremonium sp.</td><td>Micrococcus luteus (+)<br>neg.</td><td>2×10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2×10<sup>2</sup></td><td>2×10<sup>4</sup></td><td>neg.<br>Penicillium sp.1</td><td>Enterobacter cloacae (-)<br>neg.</td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>3×10<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2×10<sup>3</sup></td><td>3×10<sup>4</sup></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>Escherichia coli (-)<br>Enterobacter cloacae (-)<br>Acremonium sp., Aspergillus sp.</td><td>Enterobacter cloacae (-)<br>Penicillium sp.1<br>Acremonium sp.</td><td>2×10<sup>3</sup><br>2×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4×10<sup>3</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Klebsiella ozaenae (-)<br>neg.</td><td>Serratia marcescens (-)<br>Candida Albicans</td><td>3×10<sup>4</sup><br>2×10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3×10<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td>Acinetobacter sp. (-)<br>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2×10<sup>2</sup><br>1×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3×10<sup>4</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>2×10<sup>4</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>1×10<sup>3</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Acinetobacter sp. (-)<br>neg.</td><td>3×10<sup>3</sup><br>2×10<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td>2×10<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td>Enterobacter cloacae (-)<br>Aspergillus fumigatus</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>3×10<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Escherichia coli (-)<br>neg.</td><td>2×10<sup>4</sup></td></tr><tr><td>3×10<sup>4</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td></td><td>Escherichia coli. (-)<br>Enterobacter cloacae (-)<br>Panicillium sp.3</td><td>2×10<sup>4</sup><br>2×10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Enterobacter cloacae(-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td></td><td>3×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>4×10<sup>2</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td>Aspergillus sp.</td><td></td><td></td><td>Klebsiella ozaenae (-)<br>Pseudomonas fluorescens (-)<br>Panicillium sp.1</td><td>2×10<sup>3</sup><br>2×10<sup>4</sup><br>3×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td>Serratia marcescens (-)<br>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr><tr><td>4×10<sup>2</sup></td><td>3×10<sup>3</sup></td><td>Micrococcus luteus (+)<br>Serratia marcescens (-)<br>Aspergillus flavus</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td></td><td>1×10<sup>3</sup><br>2×10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.<br>neg.</td><td></td><td></td><td>neg.</td></tr></tbody></table>

neg.: negative M: Male F: Female UF: UnFed FF: Freshly Fed SG: Semi Gravid G: Gravid A:sh: Animal shelter (+): Gram-positive bacteria (-): Gram-negative bacteria.

aColony forming unit.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.t001
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Origin and frequency of isolation of the different microorganisms.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050259.g005</figcaption></figure>

belong to the genera *Acinetobacter*, *Bacillus*, *Brevibacterium*, *Burkholderia*, *Cellulomonas*, *Chloroflexi*, *Citrobacter*, *Enterobacter*, *Escherichia*, *Flavimonas*, *Gordonia*, *Klebsiella*, *Maltophila*, *Microbacterium*, *Micrococcus*, *Morganella*, *Ochrobactrum*, *Oligella*, *Pantoea*, *Pseudomonas*, *Serratia*, *Shigella*, *Sphingobacterium*, *Staphylococcus*, *Stenotrophomonas*, *Streptococcus* and *Weeksella* [14,15,16,17,19,20,25]. In agreement with these investigations, bacteria belonging to the genera *Acinetobacter*, *Bacillus*, *Enterobacter*, *Escherichia*, *Klebsiella*, *Micrococcus*, *Pseudomonas* and *Serratia* were isolated from our samples. *E. cloacae* being the most common bacteria isolated from the sand flies' gut. This result is in agreement with other studies carried out on sand flies [15,16,17,19,20,26,]. *Asaia* sp. that has never been previously reported from sand flies has been isolated in the present study. We also report the isolation of *K. ozaenae* from both cuticle and midgut of four females. This bacterium was previously reported once from the midgut of *Lutzomyia longipalpis*, the vector of visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas [1].

Several studies have reported a higher prevalence of Gram-
negative bacteria than Gram-positive ones in the gut of different
vector insects [19,20,25,27]. The lower prevalence of Gram-
positive bacteria as compared to Gram-negative ones is due to
antimicrobial activity against *M. luteus* and *B. subtilis* [20,28] which
make them less susceptible to colonization by Gram-positive
bacteria. This is in agreement with our observation that the
majority of the bacterial strains isolated in the present study were
Gram-negative bacteria (76%) mainly *Enterobacter*, *Serratia* and
*Pseudomonas*. Some studies have investigated a correlation between
the presence of midgut bacteria and the development of parasites
in flies. A high concentration of bacteria (mainly Gram-negative)
in the midgut of mosquitoes as well as sand flies was reported to
either completely or partly influence the development of parasites

[2,20,29,30]. In mosquitoes, a wide range of bacterial strains such as *Serratia*, *Klebsiella*, *Acinetobacter*, *Micrococcus*, *Escherichia*, *Enterobacter*, *Micrococcus*, *Pseudomonas*, *Staphylococcus* were pointed out as being symbionts in gut flora [31,32,33]. There is general agreement on the important role played by the gut microbial flora on the development of pathogens in the midgut of the insect. *Wolbachia* are common and widespread cytoplasmically inherited bacteria, found in reproductive tissues of arthropods, including Phlebotomine sand flies [34,35]. Its interactions with its hosts are often complex and have evolved to be symbiotic rather than parasitic [34,35,36]. The lack of *Wolbachia* isolated in the present study might be due to the isolation and characterization methodology that we have used.

Several studies have reported the inhibitory activity of Gram-
negative bacteria on the development of parasites in the
mosquitoes' gut [28,31,33,37,38,39]. In sand flies, a study [19]
reported a high prevalence of microbial infection in the digestive
tract of laboratory reared *Phlebotomus papatasi* females and
hypothesized they could have a negative effect on *Leishmania*
transmission in endemic areas. However, these studies have not
clearly identified the causal mechanisms explaining the impact of
microbial infection on the intravectorial development of *Leishman-
ia*. It is as yet impossible to know whether the microflora of sand
flies could affect the development of *Leishmania* or not. Because of
the low prevalence of *Leishmania* spp. in the sand flies' gut, we
could not explore this link in the present study but future studies
on colonized species should be done to clarify the relationship.
Interestingly, promastigotes of *Leishmania* in culture grow with
difficulty when competing with bacteria. In the same way, bacteria
can interfere with the development of promastigotes in the
digestive tract of sand flies probably by competing for nutrients
and reducing the pH [14]. In nature, despite the probable well-balanced associations between some bacteria and sand flies, there could be natural selective pressure involving some species of bacteria, *Leishmania* and their vectors.

Only a few publications that have aimed to identify fungal diversity are available and the majority of these are from work on mosquitoes [39,40] only one [19] has been carried out on Phlebotomine sand flies. That study showed that only *Aspergillus sclerotiorum* and *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* were present in sand flies. In our study, we did not isolate and identify these two species, but we isolated and identified other species belonging to the *Aspergillus* genera (*A. flavus*, *A. fumigatus*, *A. nidulans*, *A. terreus*), *Penicillium*, *Geotrichum*, *Fusarium*, *Acremonium* and *Candida*. It was not possible for us to explain the role of these fungi which we isolated from the sand fly cuticle and/or midgut or reach any conclusion about any potential pathogenic effect or interaction with *Leishmania*. However, Adler and Theodor [41] and Schlein et al. [19] have proposed that female *P. papatasi* infected by fungal strains were significantly more resistant to *Leishmania major* infection.

The eggs of Phlebotomine sand flies are laid in soil that is rich in organic matter and the larvae pass through four instars in the soil before pupation and adult emergence. Consequently, the local soil environment and animal stools may play an important role in the colonization capacity of the sand flies, with microorganisms geographically specific encountered at the oviposition sites or during sugar meal feeding [42].

A large number of soil and environmental strains including *Acinetobacter* sp., *Asaia* sp., *B. subtilis*, *M. luteus*, *P. fluorescens*, *Pantoea* sp. and *S. marcescens* and also intestinal strains such as *E. cloacae*, *E. coli* and *K. ozaenae* were identified in the present study. These bacterial species belong to aerobic and facultative anaerobic Gram negative bacteria (*Acinetobacter* sp., *Asaia* sp., *E. cloacae*, *E. coli*, *K. ozaenae*, *Pantoea* sp., *P. fluorescens* and *S. marcescens*) and Gram positive bacteria (*B. subtilis* and *M. luteus*). According to the ecology of the bacteria and fungi isolated in the present study, it is probable that *E. coli*, *Enterobacter*, *Klebsiella*, *Pantoea*, *S. marcescens* or *C. albicans*, which all are intestinal microorganisms, have contaminated the sand flies during their larval stages. The teluric species like *Acinetobacter*, *Asaia*, *Bacillus subtilis*, *M. luteus* and *Pseudomonas* spp.

could have contaminated the larvae, but also the adults in their resting places. The ubiquitous *Aspergillus* and *Penicillium* which are also telluric microorganisms, have probably contaminated adult sand flies.

According to our findings, the average number of counted bacterial strains in females with different physiological digestive stages has increased progressively from unfed to gravid females, like the prevalence of bacteria and fungi in the midgut as well as on the cuticle of female sand flies (Table 1). The same phenomenon has been also observed on mosquitoes [14,20]. The authors of these studies suggested that the variation of the bacterial species in mosquitoes gut increased during the 24-48 hours following the blood feeding. This hypothesis could be applied to the Phlebotomine sand flies that we processed in this study. Another explanation could be that the life span of females is longer than that of males [35,43]. Therefore, it seems probable that females may encounter more fungal and bacterial contaminants during their life span.

The present paper constitutes an interesting pilot study with new findings on the isolation of bacteria and fungi on the cuticle and in the gut of sand flies. It also suggests interesting trends like an increasing number of bacterial strains and colonies depending on the physiological stage of Phlebotomine sand flies. However, these data have to be confirmed in the future by further studies carried out on more specimens.

## Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Parisa Rezanejad (Tehran University-Biostatistics Department) for her help in statistical analysis. They thank Sylvette Gobert (Reims University) and James Gordon Hamilton (Keele University) for proofreading this manuscript.

## Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MA RB RT JD MRA. Performed the experiments: MA RB AB RT MRA. Analyzed the data: MA RB TG RT DS DT JD MRA. Contributed reagents/materials/ analysis tools: MA RB TG RT DS DT JD MRA. Wrote the paper: MA RB TG RT DS DT JD MRA.

## References

1. Oliveira SMP, Moraes BA, Gonçalves CA, Giordano-Dias CM, D'almeida JM, et al. (2000) Prevalence of microbiota in the digestive tract of wild females of *Lutzomyia longipalpis* Lutz & Neiva, 1912 (Diptera: Psychodidae). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33: 319-322.

2. WHO Media centre website. Available: http://www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/index.html. Accessed 2012 Jan.

3. McCarthy CB, Diambra LA, Rivera Pomar RV (2011) Metagenomic Analysis of Taxa Associated with *Lutzomyia longipalpis*, Vector of Visceral Leishmaniasis, Using an Unbiased High-Throughput Approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: 1-10.

4. Killick-Kendrick R, Wilkes TJ, Bailly M, Bailly I, Righton LA (1986) Preliminary field observations on the flight speed of a Phlebotomine sand fly. Trans R Soci Trop Med Hyg 80: 138-142.

5. Ferro C, Pardo R, Torres M, Morrison A (1997) Larval microhabitats of *Lutzomyia longipalpis* (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. J Med Entomol 34: 719-728.

6. Ireri LN, Kongoro J, Ngure P, Sum KS, Tonui W (2011) Insecticidal properties of Pyrethrin formulation against immature stages of Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J entomol 8: 581-587.

7. Schlein Y, Jacobson R, Muller GC (2001) Sand fly feeding on noxious plants: a potential method for the control of leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65: 300-303.

8. Samie M, Wallbanks KR, Moore JS, Molineux DH (1990) Glycosidase activity in the sand fly *Phlebotomus papatasi*. Comp Biochem Physiol 96: 577-579.

9. Schlein Y (1986) Sand fly diet and *Leishmania*. Parasitol Today 2: 175-177.

10. Schlein Y, Warburg A (1986) Phytophagy and the feeding cycle of *Phlebotomus papatasi* (Diptera: Psychodidae) under experimental conditions. J Med Entomol 23: 11-15.

11. Rassi Y, Oshaghi MA, Mohammadi-Azani S, Abaie MR, Rafizadeh S, et al. (2011) Molecular Detection of *Leishmania* Infection Due to *Leishmania major* and

*Leishmania turanica* in the Vectors and Reservoir Host in Iran. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11: 145-150.

12. Strelkova MV, Eliseev LN, Ponirovsky EN, Dergacheva TI, Evans DA (2001) Mixed *leishmanial* infections in *Rhombomyces opimus*: a key to the persistence of *Leishmania major* from one transmission season to the next. Ann Trop Med Parasit 95: 811-819.

13. Dillon RJ, Dillon VM (2004) The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 49: 71-92.

14. Dillon RJ, El Kordy E, Lane RP (1996) The prevalence of a microbiota in the digestive tract of *Phlebotomus papatasi*. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 90: 669-673.

15. Gouveia C, Asensi MD, Zahner V, Rangel EF, Oliveira SM (2008) Study on the bacterial midgut microbiota associated to different Brazilian populations of *Lutzomyia longipalpis* (Lutz & Neiva) (Diptera: Psychodidae). Neotrop Entomol 37: 597-601.

16. Hillesland H, Read A, Subhadra B, Hurwitz I, McKelvey R, et al. (2008) Identification of Aerobic Gut Bacteria from the Kala Azar Vector, *Phlebotomus argentipes*: A Platform for Potential Paratransgenic Manipulation of Sand flies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79: 881-886.

17. Rajendran P, Modi GB (1982) Bacterial flora of sand fly gut (Diptera: Psychodidae). Indian J Public Health 26: 49-52.

18. Rodrigo S, Salvatore T (2003) *Lutzomyia longipalpis* (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae): a review. An Acad Bras Cienc 75: 301-330.

19. Schlein Y, Polacheck I, Yuva B (1985) Mycoses, bacterial infections and antibacterial activity in sand flies (Psychodidae) and their possible role in the transmission of leishmaniasis, Parasitology. 90: 57-66.

20. Volf P, Kiewengova A, Nemec A (2002) Bacterial colonization in the gut of *Phlebotomus dubosciqi* (Diptera: Psychodidae): Transtadial passage and the role of female diet. Folia Parasitol 49: 73-77.
21. Rassi Y, Javadian E, Nadim A, Zahrai A, Vatandoost H, et al. (2005) *Phlebotomus (Larroussius) kandelakii* the principal and proven vector of visceral leishmaniasis in north west of Iran. Pak J Biol Sci 8: 1802-1806.

22. Oshaghi MA, Maleki Ravasan N, Hide M, Javadian E, Rassi Y, et al. (2009) *Phlebotomus perfiliewi transcaucasicus* is circulating both *Leishmania donovani* and *L.infantum* in north-west Iran. Exp Parasitol 123: 218-25.

23. Parvizi P, Mazloumi-Gavgani AS, Davies CR, Courtenay O, Ready PD (2008) Two *Leishmania* species circulating in the Kaleybar focus of infantile visceral leishmaniasis, northwest Iran: implications for deltamethrin dog collar intervention. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102: 891-7.

24. Sanei Dehkordi A, Rassi Y, Oshaghi MA, Abai MR, Rafizadeh S, et al. (2011) Molecular Detection of *Leishmania infantum* in Naturally Infected *Phlebotomus perfiliewi transcaucasicus* in Bilesavar District, Northwestern Iran. Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis 5: 20-27.

25. Midori O, Braig HR, Munstermann L, Ferro C, O'neill S (2001) *Wolbachia* infections of Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Med Ent J 38: 237-241.

26. Oliveira SMP, Moraes BA, Gonçalves CA, Giordano-Dias CM, D'almeida JM, et al. (1998) Prevalência da microbiota no trato digestivo de fêmeas de *Lutzomyia longipalpis* (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) (Diptera: Psychodidae) provenientes do campo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33: 319-322.

27. DeMaio J, Pumpuni CB, Kent M, Beier JC (1996) The midgut bacterial flora of wild *Aedes triseriatus*, *Culex pipiens* and *Psorophora columbiae* mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 54: 219-223.

28. Kiewegova A (1999) Antimikrobialni activity *Phlebotomus duboscqi*. Unpubl M.Sc. Thesis, Charles University, Prague, 81pp.

29. Guernaoui S, Garcia D, Gazanion E, Ouhdouch Y, Boumezzough A, et al. (2011) Bacterial flora as indicated by PCR-temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) of 16S rDNA gene fragments from isolated guts of Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Vec Ecol 36: 144-147.

30. Tanada Y, Kaya HK (1993) Associations between insects and nonpathogenics microorganisms. In Y. Tanada & H.K. Kaya (eds.), Insect pathology, p.12-51. Academic Press, New York, 666p.

31. Gonzalez-Ceron L, Santillan F, Rodriguez MH, Mendez D, Hernández-Avila JE (2003) Bacteria in midguts of field collected *Anopheles albimanus* block *Plasmodium vivax* sporogonic development. J Med Entomol 40: 371-4.

32. Pumpuni CB, Beier MS, Nataro JP, Guers LD, Davis JR (1993) *Plasmodium falciparum* - Inhibition of sporogonic development in *Anopheles stephensi* by Gram-negative bacteria. Exp Parasitol 77: 195-199.

33. Seitz HM, Maier WA, Rottok M, Becker-Feldmann H (1987) Concomitant infections of *Anopheles stephensi* with *Plasmodium berghei* and *Serratia marcescens*: additive detri-mental effects. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 266: 155-166.

34. Benlarbi M, Ready PD (2003) Host-specific *Wolbachia* strains in widespread populations of *Phlebotomus perniciosus* and *P. papatasi* (Diptera: Psychodidae) and prospects for driving genes into these vectors of *Leishmania*. Bull Entomol Res 93: 383-391.

35. Merritt RW, Dadd RH, Walker ED (1992) Feeding-behavior, natural food, and nutritional relationships of larval mosquitos. Annu Rev Entomol 37: 349-376.

36. Werren JH, Guo L, Windsor DW (1995) Distribution of *Wolbachia* among neotropical arthropods. Proc R Soc London Ser 262: 197-204.

37. Aguilar R, Jedlicka AE, Mintz M, Mahairaki V, Scott AL, et al. (2005) Global gene expression analysis of *Anopheles gambiae* responses to microbial challenge. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 35: 709-19.

38. Jadin J, Vincke IH, Dunjic A, Delville JP, Wery M, et al. (1966) Role of *Pseudomonas* in the sporogenesis of the hematozoon of malaria in the mosquito In French. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales 59: 514-525.

39. Beier MS, Pumpuni CB, Beier JC, Davis JR (1994) Effects of para-aminobenzoic acid, insulin and gentamycin on *Plasmodium falciparum* development in Anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 31: 561-565.

40. St. Leger RJ, Screen SE, Shams-Pirzadeh B (2000) Lack of Host Specialization in *Aspergillus flavus*. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 320-324.

41. Adler S, Theodor O (1929) Attempts to transmit *Leishmania tropica*: the transmission of *L. tropica* by *Phlebotomus sergenti*. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 23: 1-18.

42. Pavlovich SG, Rockett CL (2000) Color, bacteria, and mosquito eggs as ovipositional attractants for *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae). Great Lake Entomol 33: 141-153.

43. Addis CJ (1945) Laboratory rearing and life cycle of *Phlebotomus (Dampfomyia) anthophorus* Addis (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Parasitol 31: 319-322.