# Wheat germ in vitro translation to produce one of the most toxic sodium channel specific toxins.

Wael Gad, Rahma Ben-Abderrazek, Khadija Wahni, Didier Vertommen, Serge Muyldermans, Balkiss Bouhaouala-Zahar, Joris Messens

► To cite this version:

Wael Gad, Rahma Ben-Abderrazek, Khadija Wahni, Didier Vertommen, Serge Muyldermans, et al. Wheat germ in vitro translation to produce one of the most toxic sodium channel specific toxins.. Bioscience Reports, 2014, 34 (4), pp.e00122. 10.1042/BSR20140050. pasteur-01060215

HAL Id: pasteur-01060215

https://riip.hal.science/pasteur-01060215

Submitted on 3 Sep 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

# Wheat germ *in vitro* translation to produce one of the most toxic sodium channel specific toxins

Wael GAD*†‡, Rahma BEN-ABDERRAZEK§, Khadija WAHNI*†‡, Didier VERTOMMEN||, Serge MUYLDERMANS†¶, Balkiss BOUHAOUALA-ZAHAR§**<fnref n="1" /> and Joris MESSENS*†‡<fnref n="1" />

*Brussels Center for Redox Biology, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

†Structural Biology Research Center, VIB, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

‡Structural Biology Brussels Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

§Laboratoire des Venins et Molécules Thérapeutiques, Institut Pasteur de Tunis-Université Tunis El Manar, Tunisia

||de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium

¶Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

**Medical School of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, El Manar, Tunisia

## Synopsis

Envenoming following scorpion sting is a common emergency in many parts of the world. During scorpion envenoming, highly toxic small polypeptides of the venom diffuse rapidly within the victim causing serious medical problems. The exploration of toxin structure-function relationship would benefit from the generation of soluble recombinant scorpion toxins in *Escherichia coli*. We developed an *in vitro* wheat germ translation system for the expression of the highly toxic Aah (Androctonus australis hector)II protein that requires the proper formation of four disulphide bonds. Soluble, recombinant N-terminal GST (glutathione S-transferase)-tagged AahII toxin is obtained in this *in vitro* translation system. After proteolytic removal of the GST-tag, purified rAahII (recombinant AahII) toxin, which contains two extra amino acids at its N terminal relative to the native AahII, is highly toxic after i.c.v. (intracerebroventricular) injection in Swiss mice. An LD₅₀ (median lethal dose)-value of 10 ng (or 1.33 pmol), close to that of the native toxin (LD₅₀ of 3 ng) indicates that the wheat germ *in vitro* translation system produces properly folded and biological active rAahII. In addition, NbAahII10 (Androctonus australis hector nanobody 10), a camel single domain antibody fragment, raised against the native AahII toxin, recognizes its cognate conformational epitope on the recombinant toxin and neutralizes the toxicity of purified rAahII upon injection in mice.

**Key words:** AahII, anti-venom, dromedary, recombinant protein, scorpion toxin, single-domain antibody, wheat germ extract

Cite this article as: Gad, W., Ben-Abderrazek, R., Wahni, K., Vertommen, D., Muyldermans, S., Bouhaouala-Zahar B. and Messens, J., (2014) Wheat germ *in vitro* translation to produce one of the most toxic sodium channel specific toxins. Biosci. Rep. **34**(4), art:e00122.doi:10.1042/BSR20140050

## INTRODUCTION

The many accidents involving scorpion stings represent a real medical emergency in the Middle East and the south Mediterranean regions [1]. Aah (*Androctonus australis hector*) is one of the most toxic scorpions to humans and is often implicated in fatal scorpion sting accidents in Algeria and Tunisia [2]. The toxicity of the Aah scorpion venom is essentially due to the presence of three small basic toxins (7 kDa) that act on the voltage-gated sodium channels of excitable cells [3]. The family of toxins displays common cysteine-stabilized α-helix and a three-stranded β-sheet

motifs in a βαββ organization [4]. Because of sequence variability, a broad antigenic polymorphism is displayed in this family of proteins [5]. Aah toxins belong to one out of two distinct structural and antigenically unrelated groups: group I (polypeptides AahI, AahIII and AahIV) and group II (AahII) [3,5,6]. Amino acid sequence alignment showed that the cysteins are highly conserved among toxins of this family (Figure 1A). They play a crucial role in the functional architecture and structural stability of the toxins.

AahII toxin is the most poisonous toxin among all North African scorpions with an LD₅₀(median lethal dose)<3 ng upon i.c.v (intracerebroventricular) administration in Swiss mouse of

<footnote>**Abbreviations:** Aah, *Androctonus australis hector*; NbAahII10, *Androctonus australis hector* nanobody 10; CBB, Coomassie Brilliant Blue; CDR1, complementary-determining region 1; GST, glutathione S-transferase; hQSOX1b, human quiescin-sulphydryl oxidase; i.c.v., intracerebroventricular; IMAC, immobilized metal-ion-affinity chromatography; LD₅₀, median lethal dose; PDI, protein disulphide isomerase; QSOX, Quiescin sulphydryl oxidase; rAahII, recombinant AahII; TEV, tobacco etch virus; WGE, wheat germ embryo.</footnote>

<footnote n="1">¹ Correspondence may be addressed to either of these authors (email balkiss.bouhaouala@pasteur.rns.tn or joris.messens@vib-vub.be).</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1** The amino acid sequence and structure of scorpion toxin</figcaption></figure>

(A) ClustalW alignment [44] of the amino acid sequences of representative scorpion toxins is shown. *Androctonus australis* hector AahI (P01479), *Androctonus australis* hector AahIII (P01480), *A. mauretanicus* mauretanicus Amm V (P01482), *Androctonus australis* hector AahII (P01484), *Leiurus quinquestriatus* quinquestriatus LqqV (P01481), *Buthus occitanus* tunetanus BotII (P01483), *Centruroides noxious* Cn2 (AAB21461) (β-toxin), *A. mauretanicus* mauretanicus Amm VIII (Q7YXD3), *L. q. hebraeus* LqhIII (P56678) (α-like toxin), *Buthus occitanus* BotIII (P01485). The conserved cysteines are boxed. (B) The ribbon presentation of the structure of rAahII toxin (PDB 1PTX) [14,45]. The toxin contains four disulphide bonds between non-consecutive cysteines, according to the scheme depicted below. The amino acid sequence of the rAahII toxin after removal of the GST-tag contains two extra N-terminal residues (glycine and proline) that are indicated.

~20 g [7]. AahII has been purified from scorpion venom [8,9] and its structural and antigenic properties are well established [4,10]. It displays the highest affinity for site 3 of the neuronal Na<sub>v</sub>1.2 and muscular Na<sub>v</sub>1.4 channels in mammals [11]. The functional surface of LqhII, the toxin of *Leiurus quinquestriatus hebreaus* that differs remarkably only in its N- and C-termini with AahII, has been determined, as well as the docking of this protein at the voltage-dependent sodium channel [12,13]. Immunochemical analysis of AahII toxin had led to the identification of four antigenic regions, nearby the α-helix, in the N- and C-terminal regions, and in a surface loop specific to α-toxins [10,14,15]. Immunotherapy remains probably the most efficient treatment after envenomation, but the outcome depends on both accurate identification of the scorpion species involved and the timely antivenom administration [16]. Because of their high affinity and specificity, small size and robust behaviour, the single-domain antibodies, referred to as Nbs (nanobodies), have been proposed to substitute the polyclonal Fab'₂ to treat the scorpion envenoming [17,18]. Indeed, a bispecific Nb construct comprising an Nb neutralizing AahI' toxin and an Nb neutralizing AahII toxin was proven to protect mice and rats that received a subcutaneous lethal dose of the scorpion venom [3].

The progress in the molecular dissection of scorpion α-toxins and their structure and function is slow due to the difficulty of producing soluble recombinant bioactive toxins [19]. For structural and functional studies on toxins, an efficient *Escherichia coli* expression system that results in unlimited amounts of soluble, properly folded toxin is desired. Early attempts to produce rAahII (recombinant AahII) in microorganisms yielded only minor amounts of largely insoluble material that required tedious *in vitro* refolding steps [16,20,21]. However recently, the LqhII toxin and BMαTX14 toxins were refolded from inclusion bodies in single digit mg amounts per litre bacterial culture into soluble recombinant toxins showing similar biological activities as those of the native proteins [19,22]. Despite these recent successes, apparently it remains a major challenge to express large amounts of soluble toxin without *in vitro* refolding. Although it looks a promising strategy, it remains challenging to refold a 64 amino acid long peptide and oxidize eight cysteines in four correct disulphide bridges and to display the right surface epitopes necessary for its full toxicity and antigenicity. Structural and antigenic characterizations showed that recombinant scorpion toxins possess a structural flexibility that leads to the accommodation of enforced modifications in the final protein fold [23].
Here, we evaluate an eukaryotic cell-free translation system based on the WGE (wheat germ embryo) [24] for the expression of a highly toxic AahII scorpion venom protein. As this rAahII protein (7.4 kDa) has to form four disulphide bonds between cysteines located in non-consecutive positions (Figure 1), it is an excellent model for studying the capacity of the WGE system for the expression of proteins bearing multi disulphides. Furthermore, it had been described that the WGE expression system contains the cellular machinery to form complex conformational disulphide bonds [25]. We also studied the role of the oxidoreductases, *hQSOX1b* (human quiescin-sulphhydryl oxidase) and *hPDI* (human protein disulphide isomerase), as possible protein-folding catalysts. Finally, we investigated the toxicity of this rAahII (after removal of the GST (glutathione S-transferase) tag which leaves two extra amino acids at the N-terminal of the rAahII relative to the native AahII) and the potential of nanobody NbAahII10 (*Androctonus australis hector* nanobody 10), raised against native AahII toxin [3,17,26], to neutralize the toxicity of the purified rAahII toxin. Our results demonstrate the successful expression of soluble and active rAahII toxin and the ability of NbAahII10 to neutralize its toxicity in mice.

## EXPERIMENTAL

### AahII toxin, *hQSOX1b* and *hPDI* cloning into pEU vector

The gene for AahII scorpion toxin (GeneBank accession number P01484) was synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Belgium). The coding sequence (Met1-His65) was ligated into the pEU-vector (CellFree Sciences) without any tag or with an N-terminal GST-tag [with both a 3C protease (two extra N-terminal amino acids after cleavage) and a TEV (tobacco etch virus) protease (18 extra amino acids after cleavage) cleavage site] or His-tag. This plasmid vector is specially designed for the wheat-germ cell-free expression system [24] in combination with the SP6 RNA polymerase transcription system. Briefly, the coding sequence of the scorpion toxin gene was amplified by PCR and introduced into pEU vector using XhoI and SmaI restriction and EcoRV and BamHI sites, respectively.

The *hQSOX1b* (R32-I604, GeneBank accession number NP_001004128.1) without signal peptide and *hPDI* (A18-L508, GeneBank accession number NP_000909.2) without signal peptide gene fragments were cloned with a FLAG-tag and GST tag at the N-terminal position into the pEU-GST-MCS vector. The coding sequence of *hQSOX1b* and *hPDI* were amplified by PCR and introduced into the BamHI and SmaI and the XhoI and SmaI restriction sites, respectively. All constructs were confirmed by sequencing analysis performed at the VIB genetic facility (GSF).

### AahII toxin cloning and expression in *E. coli*

The AahII scorpion toxin gene was amplified by PCR from the pEU-AahII-GST construct and introduced into pET28a vector between BamHI and HindIII sites.

Plasmid DNA of pET28-GST-AahII transformed into *E. coli* SHuffle™ T7 Express (BioLabs) and Origami™ DE3 competent cells (Novagen). Transformed bacteria were grown at 37°C in the LB [Luria-Bertani (broth)] medium supplemented with 25 µg/ml Kanamycin, until *A600 nm* of 0.6. At this cell density, the expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside), and cultured overnight at 30°C. Harvested cells were resuspended in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/ml lysozyme, 0.1 mg/ml AEBSF [4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride] and 0.1 µg/ml leupeptine. Cells were broken at 4°C by three sonifications for 1 min each and centrifuged for 30 min at 14000 rpm. For identification, protein fractions of supernatant (7.5 µl) and pellet (7.5 µl) were analysed by non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE and Western blot detection using anti-GST antibody (EnoGene).

### Small-scale transcription and translation reaction

Plasmid DNA of the pEU-AahII scorpion toxin (+GST, +His-tag and without tag) was extracted using the Maxiprep DNA extraction kit (Invitrogen) and extra purified using the phenol/chloroform method to remove all RNase contamination [24]. DNA (2 µg) of each construct was transcribed using SP6 RNA polymerase, 25 mM NTP mix, RNase inhibitor and 5× transcription buffer (CellFree Sciences) for 6 h at 37°C without shaking. The mRNA was cooled to avoid degradation and checked on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel. For translation, the mRNA of each construct (10 µl) mixed with the same amount of the WGE WEPRO 7240G (CellFree Sciences) and 0.1 mg of creatine kinase to make the bottom layer, was incubated with the 1× SUB-A MIX SGC (upper layer), which includes the amino acid mixture (CellFree Sciences). This was incubated at 15°C for 20 h without shaking in a 96-well plate (Greiner bio-one) using a small Eppendorf tube Thermomixer (Roche).

### Co-expression of rAahII toxin with *hQSOX1b* and/or *hPDI*

pEU FLAG-tag *hQSOX1b*, FLAG-tag *hPDI* and GST-tag, His-tag and no tag rAahII toxin (2 µg each) were transcribed separately using SP6 RNA polymerase, 25 mM NTP mix, RNase inhibitor and 5× transcription buffer. The mRNA of respectively rAahII toxin, *hQSOX1b* and *hPDI* were translated at 26°C for 10 min using the WGE WEPRO7240G. The mRNA of rAahII toxin (10 µl) was then mixed with the same amount of mRNA from *hQSOX1b*, *hPDI* and *hQSOX1b + hPDI* to make the bottom layer and incubated at 15°C for 20 h without shaking in a 96-well plate with 206 µl of the SUB-A MIX SGC (upper layer) which includes the amino acid mixture for each reaction. After the incubation, the expressed proteins were evaluated on a CBB (Coomassie Brilliant Blue)-stained 15% non-reducing SDS/PAGE, and by Western blot using anti-His (Sigma Aldrich), anti-GST antibody (EnoGene) and NbAahII10.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

## NbAahII10 C/S expression and purification

Identification of NbAahII10 was described previously [26]. The amino acid sequence analysis showed that NbAahII10 contains a single cysteine in its CDR1 (complementary-determining region 1) [17], which leads to dimerization of the Nb upon storage. To avoid this dimerization, the cysteine was substituted by serine and the resulting NbAahII10 C/S was shown to be identical to freshly prepared NbAahII10 in recognizing its cognate antigen.

For large-scale production of the recombinant His-tagged NbAahII10 C/S, 6 litres of Terrific Broth supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) glucose and 100 µg/ml ampicillin was grown at 37°C until an A$_{600nm}$ between 0.6 and 0.9 was reached. Expression of the recombinant protein was induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (Sigma Aldrich) and the culture was further incubated at 28°C for 16 h. After pelleting the cells, the periplasmic proteins were extracted by osmotic shock [17,18], and loaded onto Ni$^{2+}$-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare) for IMAC (immobilized metal-ion-affinity chromatography) equilibrated in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), 1 M NaCl. The unbound proteins were washed out with ten column volumes of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), 1 M NaCl, followed with 30 column volumes of 50 mM Na phosphate buffer solution, 1 M NaCl (pH 6.0). The recombinant protein was eluted from the resin with 5 ml of 50 mM Na acetate, 1 M NaCl (pH 4.7). The pH of the fractions under the elution peak was increased by adding 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The fractions under the elution peak were concentrated on a 3.5 kDa molecular mass cut-off filters (Millipore Belgium) and loaded onto a Superdex75 10/30 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with PBS (pH 7.5). The purity of the protein fraction was evaluated by 15% non-reducing SDS/PAGE and stained with CBB. The absorption at 280 nm and the theoretical extinction coefficient were used to determine the protein concentration [27].

## Immunodetection using ELISA, dot blot and Western blot

The expressed rAahII toxin proteins have been evaluated by SDS/15%PAGE stained with CBB or by Western blot using polyclonal AahII-specific rabbit antibody, anti-GST antibody (EnoGene), anti-His antibody (Sigma Aldrich) or AahII toxin-specific NbAahII10 C/S. The ELISA, Western blot and dot blot assays were used to assess the ability of the purified rAahII toxin to be recognized by different antibodies. Briefly for ELISA, samples of 1 µg/ml purified GST-rAahII (cleaved and non-cleaved) were coated on maxisorb plates (Nunc). After blocking of residual protein-binding sites with PBS, 5% non-fat dried skimmed milk powder, polyclonal AahII-specific rabbit antibodies (1/5000 dilution), anti-GST (1/10000), anti-His (1/10000) or AahII-specific NbAahII10 antibody 5 µg/ml [17,26], were incubated, 1 h at 37°C. Immunoreactivity was revealed using a goat anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase conjugate (1/1000), anti-rabbit IgG alkaline phosphatase (1/1500) or an anti-mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase (1/1500), respectively. Absorbance was measured at 492 nm, after 15 min incubation with the conjugate-enzyme substrate at room temperature. ELISA assays were repeated twice.

## Up-scaling of the GST-rAahII toxin fusion with and without hQSOX1b

For up-scaling, plasmid DNA of GST-rAahII toxin (25 µg) and FLAG-tag hQSOX1b (25 µg) were transcribed separately for 6 h at 37°C using SP6 RNA polymerase, 25 mM NTP mix, RNase inhibitor and 5× transcription buffer (CellFree Sciences). The mRNA was cooled to avoid degradation and checked on 1% (w/v) agarose gel. For translation the mRNA (250 µl) was mixed with the same amount (250 µl) of the WGE WEPRO 7240G and 1 mg of creatine kinase to make the bottom layer. The 5.5 ml of 1X SUB-A MIX including an amino acid mixture (CellFree Sciences) was used for translation at 15°C for 20 h without shaking in a six-well plate in Thermomixer incubator (Roche). The expressed protein was evaluated, before purification, on SDS/15%PAGE stained with CBB and by Western blot using anti-GST antibody (EnoGene) and scorpion toxin-specific NbAahII10. For co-expression, mRNA from GST-rAahII toxin and FLAG-hQSOX1b were translated separately for 10 min at 26°C using WGE WEPROG. After 10 min incubation, mRNA of GST-rAahII toxin was mixed with the same amount of mRNA from hQSOX1b and translation was continued at 15°C for 20 h without shaking.

## Purification of GST-rAahII fusion and cleavage with rhinovirus 3C protease

For purification, two batches (6 ml each) of GST-rAahII fusion (expressed with and without hQSOX1b) were spun down at 14000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant (6 ml) was bound to 0.5 ml Glutathione Sepharose™ beads (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, for 2 h at 4°C. The mixture loaded on a PD10 column, and washed with three-column volumes of the same buffer solution and the GST fusion was eluted with (2 ml) 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM reduced L-glutathione. Eluted proteins were dialysed for 4 h at 4°C against PBS (pH 7.5) with two buffer changes. The purity of the purified protein was evaluated by non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE and by a Western blot using anti-GST antibody. The GST-tag was cleaved overnight at 16°C using human rhinovirus 3C protease enzyme (prepared in-house). A 10-kDa Millipore concentrator was used to separate the uncleaved GST-tagged rAahII (33 kDa) from cleaved rAahII (7 kDa). The 2 ml flow through was concentrated on a 3.5-kDa concentrator to 20 µl, and the protein concentration was determined based on the theoretical extinction coefficient at 280 nm for the rAahII amino acid sequence, which gives an absorbance for a 0.1% solution of the rAahII toxin of 2.26. The endotoxin level of the purified rAahII protein was measured using LAL (Limulus amoebocyte lysate) assay. The same values were obtained for the rAahII protein extract as for PBS (negative control) (results not shown).

## MS analysis

Intact protein mass measurements were performed by direct infusion in a micro electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometer (LTQ XL, ThermoFisher Scientific). Briefly, purified TEV
protease cleaved rAahII toxin was desalted using C18 Spin Columns (Thermo Scientific) and eluted in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid. The mass spectrometer was operated manually in positive ion mode with a source voltage set at 3.8 kV and the ion transfer tube at 220°C. The parent ions were submitted to SID (in-source dissociation) using the minimal energy to promote efficient declustering of water molecules and salts adducts. The mass spectra were deconvoluted using the software ProMass Deconvolution from ThermoFisher Scientific.

## Toxicity assay and LD₅₀ determination

All experiments on mice were carried out in accordance with the European Community Council Directive (86/609/EEC) for experimental animal care, and all procedures met with the approval of the Institutional Research Board of the Pasteur Institute of Tunis. A cohort of four to six healthy male Swiss mice (20 ± 2 g) was used to estimate the toxicity of the native AahII or purified recombinant 3C protease cleaved rAahII toxins. Samples of 5 µl native AahII (3 ng), increasing amounts of freshly prepared rAahII toxin (4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15 and 20 ng) and increasing amounts of freeze-thawed rAahII toxin (4, 6, 8, and 10 ng) in PBS-containing buffer were individually injected by i.c.v. route. As negative control, mice received only PBS buffer or a 10 ng unrelated protein (Urtica dioica agglutinin protein [28]), which has been produced following exactly the same procedure as described for the rAahII toxin. As positive control, native AahII toxin purified as described previously [26] was used. Deaths within each cohort of four mice were monitored 24 h after injection. The LD₅₀ was determined as the amount of toxin whereby 50% of the mice survived the injection [17,29]. All assays were repeated three times to assess the reproducibility.

## Neutralization assay

For the in vivo neutralization assays, we mixed an increasing lethal dose of purified 3C protease cleaved rAahII toxin with a ~2-fold molar excess of NbAahII10 C/S in a total volume of 5 µl and incubated the mixture for 1 h at 37°C before i.c.v. injection [26]. In all cases, the mouse survivals were monitored 24 h after injection. Native AahII toxin was used as a positive control. Negative control mice received only PBS buffer or the unrelated *Urtica dioica* agglutinin protein. The NC (neutralization capacity) was calculated according to the guidelines proposed by the WHO (1981): [NC (LD₅₀/mg of Nb) = (LD₅₀ in presence of Nb - LD₅₀ in absence of Nb)/mg of Nb].

# RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

## Wheat germ in vitro translation system expressing soluble GST-tagged rAahII toxin

Previous studies showed that the expression of recombinant scorpion toxins in *E. coli* [19,30–35] and in yeast [36] produced insoluble toxins that could be refolded to yield 1–4 µg/l

culture. In addition, the yield obtained with monkey kidney COS-7 cells was extremely low (0.2 µg/10⁶ cells) [20]. Nevertheless the pET-14 expression system seemed to produce large quantities of inclusion bodies in bacteria, which could be solubilized and in vitro refolded into mg amounts per litre of culture. The aggregation of recombinant toxin might be due to the presence of large solvent exposed hydrophobic patches (e.g. the AahII-binding site onto the sodium channel site 3 relies on a large hydrophobic surface [12]); however, the absence of disulphide bond formation between the eight cysteines of the scorpion toxin in the cytoplasm is possibly the major factor for the insolubility. We therefore decided first to target the expression of rAahII toxin with an N-terminal GST-tag to the cytoplasm of SHuffle™ T7 Express cells. In SHuffle™ T7 Express cells, the genes for glutaredoxin reductase and thioredoxin reductase have been deleted, which allows disulphide bonds to form in the cytoplasm [37–39]. Furthermore, SHuffle cells express a version of the periplasmic disulphide bond isomerase DsbC that lacks its signal sequence, retaining it in the cytoplasm. The DsbC enzyme has been shown to act on proteins with multiple disulphide bonds, to correct misoxidized bonds and promote proper folding [40]. At the same time, we expressed GST-rAahII toxin using Origami™ DE3 cells. Proteins in the soluble and insoluble fractions were evaluated on non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE gels stained with CBB, or by Western blot using anti-GST antibody (results not shown). All these conditions failed to reveal a band corresponding to the size of GST-rAahII toxin. This indicates that even these modified *E. coli* based systems are not suitable for the expression of soluble GST-rAahII toxin.

Thus, we decided to express rAahII toxin in the eukaryotic cell-free translation system based on the WGE [24]. The WGE comprises all components for translation, stored in a dried state, and ready for protein synthesis as soon as germination starts. Hence, the WGE extract complemented with mRNA has been documented to synthesize toxic proteins and eukaryotic multidomain proteins in a folded state [25]. As such, we cloned the synthetic rAahII toxin gene into the pEU-vector with an N-terminal GST-tag, His-tag and without tag. This pEU plasmid vector had specifically been designed for the wheat-germ cell-free expression system [24] to operate in combination with the SP6 RNA polymerase transcription system. After 6 h of transcription at 37°C, the mRNA was cooled to avoid degradation and it was evaluated on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel (Figure 2A). The WGE translation mixture was incubated for 20 h at 15°C, and the expression of several rAahII toxin constructs was evaluated by non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE, by Western blot, and with an ELISA using anti-GST antibody, anti-His antibody, rabbit polyclonal AahII-specific antibody and NbAahII10 [17,26]. Apparently, the His-tagged toxin and the non-tagged toxin are not expressed, but the GST-tagged rAahII toxin was observed in the soluble fraction and is recognized with the anti-GST antibody in Western blot (Figure 2B), with the rabbit polyclonal AahII-specific antibody in ELISA (Figure 2C), and with NbAahII10 in ELISA and dot blot (Figure 2D). The soluble expression of the GST-rAahIII was independent of the cleavage site linker within the GST-construct.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2** Expression of GST-rAahll toxin fusion with WGE and immuno-characterization</figcaption></figure>

(A) Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel showing the mRNA of *hQSOX1b*, *hPDI*, *GST-rAahll*, *His-rAahll* and *rAahll* toxin without tag after transcription. Stars indicate the specific mRNA bands. (B) Non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE showing the migration of the purified GST-rAahll fusion (33 kDa) next to a pre-stained size marker (Fermentas) (left). The Western blot (right) is developed using an anti-GST antibody (EnoGene). Stars indicate the protein bands of the GST-rAahll fusion. (C) Results of an ELISA with cleaved and non-cleaved purified GST-rAahll toxin (with and without oxidoreductase *hQSOX1b*) (~300 ng/well) as revealed with a rabbit polyclonal Aahll-specific antibody and NbAahll10. As a negative control a non-related protein was used, as a positive control native Aahll (100 ng/well). (D) Both cleaved and non-cleaved GST-rAahll toxin are recognized by NbAahll10 in dot blot experiment.

## Co-expression with *hQSOX1b* or *hPDI* does not increase the yield of GST-rAahll toxin

Previously, we observed that the expression of disulphide bond rich proteins benefit from the presence of oxidoreductases, like *hQSOX1b* [41]. Properly folded scorpion toxin rAahII has to form four disulphide bonds (Figure 1B). Therefore we tested whether the expression of scorpion toxin might benefit from the presence of these oxidoreductases for the correct formation of disulphide bonds. We co-expressed the rAahII toxin in the wheat germ system with *hQSOX1b* and *hPDI*, respectively. The plasmids (2 µg each) encoding FLAG-tag *hQSOX1b*, FLAG-tag *hPDI* and GST-tag, His-tag and non-tagged rAahII toxin were transcribed separately with SP6 RNA polymerase. The mRNA was cooled and checked on a 1% agarose gel prior to

translation (Figure 2A). The mRNA of rAahII toxin, *hQSOX1b* and *hPDI*, respectively, were translated for 10 min at 26°C using the WGE WEPRO7240G. For each reaction, the mRNA of rAahII toxin (10 µl) was mixed with the same amount of mRNA from *hQSOX1b*, *hPDI* and *hQSOX1b* + *hPDI* and incubated in a 96-well plate at 15°C for 20 h without shaking with 206 µl of the SUB-A mixture (upper layer). After the incubation, the expressed proteins were visualized on a CBB-stained non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE gel, and by Western blot developed with anti-His, with anti-GST antibody (Figure 2B), and an ELISA and dot blot with NbAahll10 (Figures 2C and 2D). Only the GST-rAahII toxin construct was expressed in soluble form, and co-expression with *hQSOX1b* or *hPDI* did not increase the final yield. Our results suggest that the presence of the GST-tag is beneficial for the
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3** Non-reducing SDS-PAGE of rAahII</figcaption></figure>

(A) The migration of proteins on a non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE is shown for the purified non-cleaved GST-rAahII toxin (34 kDa, right-hand lane), and purified GST-rAahII toxin fusion expressed with and without *hQSOX1b* after cleavage with 3C protease. The rAahII toxin, GST and 3C protease enzyme migrate as a band of 7, 26 and 66 kDa, respectively. Stars denote the migration of the rAahII toxin bands. (B) A non-reducing SDS/15%PAGE showing the purified NbAahII10 C/S and rAahII toxin, both indicated by a black star.

folding of rAahII toxin in a wheat germ cell-free system, whereas no extra effect from disulphide forming oxidoreductases could be demonstrated.

## The rAahII toxin is recognized by a Nb raised against native toxin

In the next step, we purified GST-rAahII toxin in the presence and absence of *hQSOX1b* using Glutathione Sepharose™ beads. Target fusion proteins were eluted in 2 ml elution buffer and the GST-tag was cleaved off using human rhinovirus 3C protease (at 16 °C for 12 h). Cleaved and non-cleaved proteins, expressed with and without oxidoreductase *hQSOX1b*, were evaluated by non-reduced SDS/15%PAGE (Figure 3A). Non-cleaved GST-toxin (34294 Da) migrates as a ~34 kDa protein indicating the presence of both GST (25750.9 Da) and toxin (7406.3 Da). Both antibodies, raised against AahII toxin and against GST, recognized purified GST-rAahII toxin (Figures 2B and 2C). The cleaved GST-toxin fusion proteins migrate after SDS/15%PAGE as separate bands of ~26 kDa (GST) and ~9 kDa (toxin + extra amino acids). Mass spectrometrical analysis after a tryptic digest of both bands confirmed their identity as GST and rAahII toxin, respectively.

In the next step, we wanted to test whether NbAahII10, a single domain antibody fragment raised against native AahII toxin [17,26], recognizes the cleaved recombinant toxin. Note that the cleaved rAahII protein contains two extra amino acids at its N-terminal end (Figure 1B). We expressed Nanobody NbAahII10 C/S in *E. coli* and purified it as described [17]. The IMAC purified protein elutes from the size exclusion chromatographic column as a single peak at the volume expected for a monomeric Nb and migrates after SDS/PAGE as a single band (Figure 3B). NbAahII10 C/S recognizes GST-rAahII toxin before and after cleavage with rhinovirus C3 in an ELISA and in a dot blot experiment (Figures 2C and 2D). However, after Western blot, NbAahII10 C/S failed apparently to recognize the toxin, which suggests that this

Nb binds only to a conformational epitope, and not to a linear epitope. Since NbAahII10 C/S associates only with a conformational epitope of its cognate antigen, and since the native scorpion toxin is equally well recognized as the recombinant toxin, we conclude that at least this epitope of rAahII is correctly folded.

The automated deconvolution of the mass spectrometry peaks of the TEV-protease cleaved GST-rAahII construct resulted in an average mass of 9177.4 Da, which is very close to the calculated mass of 9176.2 Da for the recombinant protein with its four disulphide bonds formed. Next, we have tried to decipher the disulphide-bonding pattern using DBond software [42]. The AahII toxin has eight cysteines forming four non-consecutive disulphide bonds: C₁₂–C₆₃, C₁₆–C₃₆, C₂₂–C₄₆ and C₂₆–C₄₈. Unfortunately, it turned-out that the DBond software was not able to handle the identification of complex mixtures of disulphide-linked peptides as produced after tryptic digest of rAahII.

## Purified rAahII is toxic for mice

The toxicity of the recombinantly produced scorpion toxin was evaluated by an i.c.v. injection of purified rAahII into Swiss mice (20 g). Previously, this standard experimental approach has been shown to be effective in testing several toxins in a reproducible manner consuming a minimal amount of material [2,3,26]. The native toxin, purified from scorpion venom extract by HPLC [26], was i.c.v. injected as a positive control.

The systemic symptoms (irritability, agitation, mastication and tachycardia) were observed in mice that received a toxic dose of the native or rAahII. These symptoms were independent of the source of AahII toxin but varied in intensity, in time of occurrence and duration depending on the injected dose. The average number of survivors at 24 h after administration was assessed from two independent experiments, and the LD₅₀-value was expressed as the amount of purified material (ng) injected into a mouse whereby 50% of the injected mice survived.
<figure><img src="image_12.png" /><figcaption>**Table 1** Toxicity of native Aahll and purified rAahll after i.c.v. injection in Swiss mice</figcaption></figure>

Cohorts of four or six mice received various amounts of recombinant rAahll toxin (in a fixed volume of 5 µl) as indicated and surviving mice were counted 24 h later. *Urtica dioica* Agglutinin protein and 0.1% (w/v) BSA in 0.15 M NaCl were used as negative controls. The LD₅₀ of native Aahll was determined at 3ng/mouse [7] and that of rAahll at 10 ng/mouse.

<table><thead><tr><th>Protein</th><th>Quantity injected (ng/mouse)</th><th>Surviving mice/total number of mice injected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Native Aahll</td><td>3</td><td>2/4</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="8">Recombinant Aahll</td><td>4</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>5/6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>3/6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>0/6</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>0/6</td></tr><tr><td>Freeze-thawed rAahll</td><td>4</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="4">Urtica dioica agglutinin protein</td><td>6</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>4/4</td></tr><tr><td>0.1% BSA-NaCl</td><td>5 (µl)</td><td>4/4</td></tr></tbody></table>

The LD₅₀ of the native Aahll injected i.c.v. in Swiss male mice (20 g in weight) is determined at 3 ng/mouse or 0.41 pmol/mouse (Table 1). With an LD₅₀ value of 10 ng/mouse our freshly purified rAahll approached this value closely. In contrast, the *Urtica dioica* agglutinin protein, used as an unrelated protein, and a freeze-thawed de-activated sample of rAahll were not toxic at all in mice. These controls indicate that the purified rAahll toxin is properly folded and that the toxicity is caused by rAahll and not by the compounds of the solution.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a soluble rAahll toxin fraction has been found so toxic. Indeed, the 3-fold lower toxicity of the recombinant protein compared to the native Aahll is far better than the previously reported hybrid construct of rAahll with maltose binding protein, which gave a 1000-fold

lower toxicity (LD₅₀ of 3 µg or ~62 pmol) after i.c.v. injection in mice [21].

The 3-fold difference in toxicity (3 ng for native Aahll and 10 ng for rAahll) can be explained in two ways. It might be that only ~30% of the rAahll is folded into an active conformation, whereas ~70% of the protein is soluble although not folded into a toxic conformation. Alternatively, it might be argued that the reduced toxicity is attributed to the two additional residues at the N-terminal part of rAahll, and/or to the absence of C-terminal amidation of rAahll toxin expressed in the WGE eukaryotic cell-free system.

### NbAahll10 C/S neutralizes the toxic effect of the rAahll toxin

Since NbAahll10 C/S raised against native Aahll recognizes recombinant toxin, we wanted to assess the neutralization capacity of this Nb on purified rAahll. Therefore we first incubated rAahll toxin with a 2-fold molar excess of NbAahll10 C/S and tested by i.c.v. injection in 20 g Swiss mice the toxicity of an increasing amount of this mixture corresponding to 1-, 1.5- or 2-fold the LD₅₀ of rAahll. All mice survived this treatment (Table 2), proving that NbAahll10 C/S neutralizes the highly toxic dose of the recombinant rAahll toxin. Subsequently, we tested an equimolar ratio of the Nb to rAahll (1:1) and showed that 40 ng of NbAahll is effectively neutralizing 2 LD₅₀ of the rAahll toxin in at least 66% of injected mice. Interestingly, ~50% of mice survived a 2 LD₅₀ dose of i.c.v. injected rAahll when mixed with Nb at a 1/0.5 rAahll/NbAahll10 molar ratio. If only ~30% of the material were folded in an active, toxic conformation (remaining 70% folded in a soluble non-toxic conformation not recognized by the Nb), we calculated that 20 ng of the 2 LD₅₀ would contain only 6 ng toxic rAahll protein that was recognized by NbAahll10 C/S. The presence of a nearly 2-fold molar excess of the Nb over the active rAahll is expected to fully neutralize all toxicity of rAahll. Since 4/6 or 3/6 mice survived the treatment, it rather indicates that the differences at the N- or C-terminal end between the native and rAahll are most likely causing the observed 3-fold reduced toxicity. These data are in line with the studies of Alami et al. [11]. They showed that the AmmVIII toxin of the *Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus* scorpion venom, which is 87% analogues to Aahll but with a striking different C-terminal end, is

<caption>**Table 2** Neutralization of purified rAahll toxin by NbAahll10 C/S</caption>

The *in vivo* neutralization was assessed after pre-incubating a molar excess (as indicated) of the NbAahll10 C/S with the rAahll toxin for 90 min at 37°C, before i.c.v. injection in Swiss mice (cohorts of six mice). Surviving mice were counted 24 h later.

<table><thead><tr><th colspan="4">NbAahll10</th></tr><tr><th>Quantity ng/mice rAahll</th><th>Molar ratio rAahll/NbAahll10</th><th>Quantity (ng/mice)</th><th>Surviving mice/total number of mice injected</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10 (~1 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1:2</td><td>40</td><td>6/6</td></tr><tr><td>15 (~1.5 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1:2</td><td>60</td><td>6/6</td></tr><tr><td>15 (~1.5 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1:1</td><td>30</td><td>6/6</td></tr><tr><td>20 (~2 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1:2</td><td>80</td><td>6/6</td></tr><tr><td>20 (~2 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1:1</td><td>40</td><td>5/6-4/6</td></tr><tr><td>20 (~2 LD<sub>50</sub>)</td><td>1/0.5</td><td>20</td><td>4/6-3/6</td></tr></tbody></table>
totally devoid of toxicity. Hence the absence of toxicity is attrib-
uted to an additional C-terminal Asp, which is not present in the
AahII toxin. This extra C-terminal residue has been suggested
to induce steric hindrance with the receptor site, which was also
demonstrated for K⁺ channel blockers [43].

In summary, properly folded, soluble and active rAahII toxin was produced in a wheat germ cell-free expression system. To be active as a toxin, rAahII toxin has to form four disulphide bonds. The rAahII toxin was only soluble expressed in a construct with an N-terminal GST tag. So far, there were no data available on the successful soluble expression of rAahII toxin in *E. coli* or with a cell-free expression system. The final yield of un-cleaved GST-tagged recombinant protein is ~600 µg in 2 ml PBS buffer solution. After cleavage, we removed the protease, the GST-tag and the un-cleaved protein by ultrafiltration through a membrane with a 10-kDa molecular mass cut-off. The 2 ml flow through was concentrated to 20 µl, which finally yielded only 4 µg of purified cleaved rAahII toxin. For future experiments, alternative membranes need to be tested for concentrating the protein. Further up-scaling with an automatized instrument might also improve the yield by replacing the consumed mRNA and WGE [24]. Nevertheless, with the expression of rAahII toxin in a wheat germ cell-free extract, we have been producing an important toxic protein with an extremely low endotoxin level, which is certainly an advantage for follow-up animal testing, and for immunotherapy investigations. In general, the wheat germ *in vitro* translation method that we described is simple and effective, and might form an excellent opportunity to obtain soluble and active recombinant toxic proteins that has to form multiple disulphide bonds.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Wael Gad, Serge Muyldermans, Balkiss Bouhaouala-Zahar and Joris Messens designed research; Wael Gad, Rahma Ben-Abderrazek, Khadija Wahni performed research; Didier Vertommen contributed analytical tools; and Wael Gad, Serge Muyldermans, Balkiss Bouhaouala-Zahar and Joris Messens analysed data and wrote the paper.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Colin Thorpe for kindly providing us a pTRC HisA plasmid with human *hQSOX1b*, Wim Hol for the pProEX HTb plasmid with human *hPDI* and Guy Vandenbussche for mass spectroscopy analysis. The authors thank Professor Mohamed El Ayeb, Laboratoire des Venins et Molécules Thérapeutiques (LVMT), Institut Pasteur Tunis (IPT) for fruitful discussions and Margarida Oliveira for technical assistance in transporting goods.

FUNDING

This work was made possible by financial support from Vlaams
Instituute Voor Biotechnologie (VIB) and the Flanders Hercules

Foundation [grant number HERC16]. J.M. and S.M. are group leaders at the VIB. W.G. is supported by the European Student Exchange Programme 'Erasmus Mundus ECW II' [grant number 141085-EM-12008-BE-ERA Mundus - ECW]. D.V. is 'collaborateur logistique of the FNRS-FRS Belgium' R.B.A. is a Post-Doc in the group of B.B.Z. B.B.Z. is 'scorpion venoms and antivenoms' group leader at the IPT.

REFERENCES

1 Chippaux, J. P. and Goyffon, M. (2008) Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal. *Acta Tropica* **107**, 71–79
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/jACTT.2008.01.007)

2 Bouhaouala-Zahar, B., Ben Abderrazek, R., Hmila, I., Abidi, N., Muyldermans, S. and El Ayeb, M. (2011) Immunological aspects of scorpion toxins: current status and perspectives. *Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets* **10**, 358–368 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10070-011-9528-6)

3 Hmila, I., Saerens, D., Ben Abderrazek, R., Vincke, C., Abidi, N., Benlasfar, Z., Govaert, J., El Ayeb, M., Bouhaouala-Zahar, B. and Muyldermans, S. (2010) A bispecific nanobody to provide full protection against lethal scorpion envenoming. *FASEB J.* **24**, 3479–3489 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10070-010-1472-9)

4 Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., Habersetzer-Rochat, C. and Rochat, H. (1988) Orthorhombic crystals and three-dimensional structure of the potent toxin II from the scorpion *Androctonus australis Hector*. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* **85**, 7443–7447
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.851744385)

5 El Ayeb, M. and Rochat, H. (1985) Polymorphism and quantitative variations of toxins in the venom of the scorpion *Androctonus australis Hector*. *Toxicon* **23**, 755–760 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-6841(85)90022-9)

6 El Ayeb, M., Bahraoui, E. M., Granier, C. and Rochat, H. (1986) Use of antibodies specific to defined regions of scorpion alpha-toxin to study its interaction with its receptor site on the sodium channel. *Biochemistry* **25**, 6671–6678
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1002/0071-926X(1986)25:6671-6678#)
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1002/0071-926X(1986)25:6671-6678#)

7 Devaux, C., Jouirou, B., Naceur Krifi, M., Clot-Faybesse, O., El Ayeb, M. and Rochat, H. (2004) Quantitative variability in the biodistribution and in toxinokinetic studies of the three main alpha toxins from the *Androctonus australis hector* scorpion venom. *Toxicon* **43**, 661–669 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.TOXICON.2004.06.003)

8 Miranda, F., Kupeyan, C., Rochat, H., Rochat, C. and Lissitzky, S. (1970) Purification of animal neurotoxins. Isolation and characterization of eleven neurotoxins from the venoms of the scorpions *Androctonus australis hector*, *Buthus occitanus tunetanus* and *Leiurus quinquestriatus* quinquestriatus. *Eur. J. Biochem.* **16**, 514–523 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-6841(70)90016-6)

9 Rochat, H., Bernard, P and Couraud, F. (1979) Scorpion toxins: chemistry and mode of action. *Adv. Cytopharmacol.* **3**, 325–334
PubMed

10 Granier, C., Novotny, J., Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., Fourquet, P., el Ayeb, M. and Bahraoui, E. (1989) The antigenic structure of a scorpion toxin. *Mol Immunol.* **26**, 503–513
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-6626(89)90032-9)

11 Alami, M., Vacher, H., Bosmans, F., Devaux, C., Rosso, J. P., Bougis, P E., Tytgat, J., Darbon, H. and Martin-Eauclaire, M. F. (2003) Characterization of Amm VIII from *Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus*: a new scorpion toxin that discriminates between neuronal and skeletal sodium channels. *Biochem. J.* **375**, 551–560 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1093/biochem/jkz003)
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

12 Wang, J., Yarov-Yarovoy, V., Kahn, R., Gordon, D., Gurevitz, M., Scheuer, T. and Catterall, W. A. (2011) Mapping the receptor site for alpha-scorpion toxins on a Na⁺ channel voltage sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. **108**, 15426–15431 *CrossRef PubMed*

13 Gur, M., Kahn, R., Karbat, I., Regev, N., Wang, J., Catterall, W. A., Gordon, D. and Gurevitz, M. (2011) Elucidation of the molecular basis of selective recognition uncovers the interaction site for the core domain of scorpion alpha-toxins on sodium channels. J. Biol. Chem. **286**, 35209–35217 *CrossRef PubMed*

14 Fabrichny, I. P., Mondielli, G., Conrod, S., Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., Bourne, Y. and Marchot, P. (2012) Structural insights into antibody sequestering and neutralizing of Na⁺ channel alpha-type modulator from old world scorpion venom. J. Biol. Chem. **287**, 14136–14148 *CrossRef PubMed*

15 Bahraoui, E., Pichon, J., Muller, J. M., Darbon, H., Elayeb, M., Granier, C., Marvaldi, J. and Rochat, H. (1988) Monoclonal antibodies to scorpion toxins. Characterization and molecular mechanisms of neutralization. J. Immunol. **141**, 214–220 *CrossRef PubMed*

16 Legros, C., Kaabi, H., El Ayeb, M., Ceard, B., Vacher, H., Bougis, P. E. and Martin-Eauclaire, M. F. (2001) Use of fusion protein constructs to generate potent immunotherapy and protection against scorpion toxins. Vaccine **20**, 934–942 *CrossRef PubMed*

17 Ben Abderrazek, R., Vincke, C., Hmila, I., Saerens, D., Abidi, N., El Ayeb, M., Muyldermans, S. and Bouhaouala-Zahar, B. (2011) Development of Cys38 knock-out and humanized version of NbAahll10 nanobody with improved neutralization of Aahll scorpion toxin. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. **24**, 727–735 *CrossRef PubMed*

18 Hmila, I., Abdallah, R. B., Saerens, D., Benlasfar, Z., Conrath, K., Ayeb, M. E., Muyldermans, S. and Bouhaouala-Zahar, B. (2008) VHH, bivalent domains and chimeric Heavy chain-only antibodies with high neutralizing efficacy for scorpion toxin Aahl'. Mol. Immunol. **45**, 3847–3856 *CrossRef PubMed*

19 Dai, H., Yin, S., Li, T., Cao, Z., Ji, Y., Wu, Y. and Li, W. (2012) Recombinant expression, purification, and characterization of scorpion toxin BmalphaTX14. Protein Expr. Purif. **82**, 325–331 *CrossRef PubMed*

20 Bougis, P. E., Rochat, H. and Smith, L. A. (1989) Precursors of *Androctonus australis* scorpion neurotoxins. Structures of precursors, processing outcomes, and expression of a functional recombinant toxin II. J. Biol. Chem. **264**, 19259–19265 *PubMed*

21 Legros, C., Ceard, B., Vacher, H., Marchot, P., Bougis, P. E. and Martin-Eauclaire, M. F. (2005) Expression of the standard scorpion alpha-toxin AaH II and AaH II mutants leading to the identification of some key bioactive elements. Biochim. Biophys. Acta **1723**, 91–99 *CrossRef PubMed*

22 Kahn, R., Karbat, I., Ilan, N., Cohen, L., Sokolov, S., Catterall, W. A., Gordon, D. and Gurevitz, M. (2009) Molecular requirements for recognition of brain voltage-gated sodium channels by scorpion alpha-toxins. J. Biol. Chem. **284**, 20684–20691 *CrossRef PubMed*

23 Bouhaouala-Zahar, B., Benkhalifa, R., Srairi, N., Zenouaki, I., Ligny-Lemaire, C., Drevet, P., Sampieri, F., Pelhate, M., El Ayeb, M., Menez, A. et al. (2002) A chimeric scorpion alpha-toxin displays de novo electrophysiological properties similar to those of alpha-like toxins. Eur. J. Biochem. **269**, 2831–2841 *CrossRef PubMed*

24 Takai, K., Sawasaki, T. and Endo, Y. (2010) Practical cell-free protein synthesis system using purified wheat embryos. Nat. Protoc. **5**, 227–238 *CrossRef PubMed*

25 Endo, Y. and Sawasaki, T. (2006) Cell-free expression systems for eukaryotic protein production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. **17**, 373–380 *CrossRef PubMed*

26 Abderrazek, R. B., Hmila, I., Vincke, C., Benlasfar, Z., Pellis, M., Dabbek, H., Saerens, D., El Ayeb, M., Muyldermans, S. and Bouhaouala-Zahar, B. (2009) Identification of potent nanobodies to neutralize the most poisonous polypeptide from scorpion venom. Biochem. J. **424**, 263–272 *CrossRef PubMed*

27 Pace, C. N., Vajdos, F., Fee, L., Grimsley, G. and Gray, T. (1995) How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. **4**, 2411–2423 *CrossRef PubMed*

28 Saul, F. A., Rovira, P., Boulot, G., Damme, E. J., Peumans, W. J., Truffa-Bachi, P and Bentley, G. A. (2000) Crystal structure of *Urtica dioica* agglutinin, a superantigen presented by MHC molecules of class I and class II. Structure **8**, 593–603 *CrossRef PubMed*

29 Bouhaouala-Zahar, B., Ducancel, F., Zenouaki, I., Ben Khalifa, R., Borchani, L., Pelhate, M., Boulain, J. C., El Ayeb, M., Menez, A. and Karoui, H. (1996) A recombinant insect-specific alpha-toxin of *Buthus occitanus tunetanus* scorpion confers protection against homologous mammal toxins. Eur. J. Biochem. **238**, 653–660 *CrossRef PubMed*

30 Li, C., Liu, W., Bossmans, F., Zhu, R. H., Tytgat, J. and Wang, D. C. (2005) Expression, renaturation and functional analysis of an excitatory insect-specific toxin from scorpion *Buthus martensii* Karsch. Protein Pept. Lett. **12**, 635–638 *CrossRef PubMed*

31 Garcia-Gomez, B. I., Olamendi-Portugal, T. C., Paniagua, J., van der Walt, J., Dyason, K. and Possani, L. D. (2009) Heterologous expression of a gene that codes for Pg8, a scorpion toxin of *Parabuthus granulatus*, capable of generating protecting antibodies in mice. Toxicon **53**, 770–778 *CrossRef PubMed*

32 Karbat, I., Kahn, R., Cohen, L., Ilan, N., Gilles, N., Corzo, G., Froy, O., Gur, M., Albrecht, G., Heinemann, S. H. et al. (2007) The unique pharmacology of the scorpion alpha-like toxin Lqh3 is associated with its flexible C-tail. FEBS J. **274**, 1918–1931 *CrossRef PubMed*

33 Zilberberg, N., Gordon, D., Pelhate, M., Adams, M. E., Norris, T. M., Zlotkin, E. and Gurevitz, M. (1996) Functional expression and genetic alteration of an alpha scorpion neurotoxin. Biochemistry **35**, 10215–10222 *CrossRef PubMed*

34 Turkov, M., Rashi, S., Noam, Z., Gordon, D., Ben Khalifa, R., Stankiewicz, M., Pelhate, M. and Gurevitz, M. (1997) *In vitro* folding and functional analysis of an anti-insect selective scorpion depressant neurotoxin produced in *Escherichia coli*. Protein Expr. Purif. **10**, 123–131 *CrossRef PubMed*

35 Estrada, G., Garcia, B. I., Schiavon, E., Ortiz, E., Cestele, S., Wanke, E., Possani, L. D. and Corzo, G. (2007) Four disulfide-bridged scorpion beta neurotoxin Cssl: heterologous expression and proper folding *in vitro*. Biochim. Biophys. Acta **1770**, 1161–1168 *CrossRef PubMed*

36 Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., Sogaard, M., Ramos, C., Cestele, S., Bougis, P. E. and Svensson, B. (1994) Production of active, insect-specific scorpion neurotoxin in yeast. Eur. J. Biochem. **223**, 637–645 *CrossRef PubMed*

37 Bessette, P H., Aslund, F., Beckwith, J. and Georgiou, G. (1999) Efficient folding of proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the *Escherichia coli* cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. **96**, 13703–13708 *CrossRef PubMed*

38 Levy, R., Weiss, R., Chen, G., Iverson, B. L. and Georgiou, G. (2001) Production of correctly folded Fab antibody fragment in the cytoplasm of *Escherichia coli* trxB gor mutants via the coexpression of molecular chaperones. Protein Expr. Purif. **23**, 338–347 *CrossRef PubMed*

39 Seyedarabi, A., Cheng, L., Zachary, I. and Djordjevic, S. (2013) Production of soluble human vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF-A(165)-heparin binding domain in *Escherichia coli*. PLoS ONE **8**, e55690 *CrossRef PubMed*

40 Vertommen, D., Depuydt, M., Pan, J., Leverrier, P, Knoops, L., Szikora, J. P., Messens, J., Bardwell, J. C. and Collet, J. F. (2008) The disulphide isomerase DsbC cooperates with the oxidase DsbA in a DsbD-independent manner. Mol. Microbiol. **67**, 336–349 *PubMed*

41 Gad, W., Nair, M. G., Van Belle, K., Wahni, K., De Greve, H., Van Ginderachter, J. A., Vandenbussche, G., Endo, Y., Artis, D. and Messens, J. (2013) The quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase (hQSOX1b) tunes the expression of resistin-like molecule alpha (RELM-alpha or mFZZ1) in a wheat germ cell-free extract. PLoS ONE **8**, e55621 *CrossRef PubMed*
42 Choi, S., Jeong, J., Na, S., Lee, H. S., Kim, H. Y., Lee, K. J. and Paek, E. (2010) New algorithm for the identification of intact disulfide linkages based on fragmentation characteristics in tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 9, 626–635
[CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13497-010-0635-9)

43 Ferrat, G., Bernard, C., Fremont, V., Mullmann, T. J., Giangiacomo, K. M. and Darbon, H. (2001) Structural basis for alpha-K toxin specificity for K⁺ channels revealed through the solution 1H NMR structures of two noxiustoxin–iberiotoxin chimeras. Biochemistry **40**, 10998–11006 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1021/bb006333g)

44 Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. **22**, 4673–4680 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1093/nucleicacids/abh028)

45 Housset, D., Habersetzer-Rochat, C., Astier, J. P. and Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. (1994) Crystal structure of toxin II from the scorpion *Androctonus australis Hector* refined at 1.3 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. **238**, 88–103 [CrossRef PubMed](https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-2647(1994)238:88-103.0)

Received 24 March 2014/2 June 2014; accepted 13 June 2014

Published as Immediate Publication 13 June 2014, doi 10.1042/BSR20140050