# Apomorphine reduces A53T α-synuclein-induced microglial reactivity through activation of NRF2 signalling pathway

Tony Heurtaux, Melanie Kirchmeyer, Eric Koncina, Paul Felten, Lorraine Richart, Oihane Uriarte Huarte, Hervé Schohn, Michel Mittelbronn

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

► To cite this version:

Tony Heurtaux, Melanie Kirchmeyer, Eric Koncina, Paul Felten, Lorraine Richart, et al.. Apomorphine reduces A53T α-synuclein-induced microglial reactivity through activation of NRF2 signalling pathway. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 2022, 42 (8), pp.2673-2695. 10.1007/s10571-021-01131-1 . hal-03415340

HAL Id: hal-03415340

https://hal.science/hal-03415340

Submitted on 25 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# Apomorphine Reduces A53T α-Synuclein-Induced Microglial Reactivity Through Activation of NRF2 Signalling Pathway

Tony Heurtaux<sup>1,2,3,●</sup> · Melanie Kirchmeyer<sup>1,2</sup> · Eric Koncina<sup>1,2</sup> · Paul Felten<sup>1,2</sup> · Lorraine Richard<sup>1,3,4</sup> · Oihane Uriarte Huarte<sup>1,3,5</sup> · Herve Schohn<sup>6</sup> · Michel Mittelbronn<sup>1,2,3,4,5,7</sup>

Received: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 18 July 2021 / Published online: 20 August 2021
© The Author(s) 2021

## Abstract

The chiral molecule, apomorphine, is currently used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). As a potent dopamine receptor agonist, this lipophilic compound is especially effective for treating motor fluctuations in advanced PD patients. In addition to its receptor-mediated actions, apomorphine has also antioxidant and free radical scavenger activities. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and microglia reactivity have emerged as central players in PD. Thus, modulating microglia activation in PD may be a valid therapeutic strategy. We previously reported that murine microglia are strongly activated upon exposure to A53T mutant α-synuclein. The present study was designed to investigate whether apomorphine enantiomers could modulate this A53T-induced microglial activation. Taken together, the results provided evidence that apomorphine enantiomers decrease A53T-induced microgliosis, through the activation of the NRF2 signalling pathway, leading to a lower pro-inflammatory state and restoring the phagocytic activity. Suppressing NRF2 recruitment (trigonelline exposure) or silencing specifically *Nfe2l2* gene (siRNA treatment) abolished or strongly decreased the anti-inflammatory activity of apomorphine. In conclusion, apomorphine, which is already used in PD patients to mimic dopamine activity, may also be suitable to decrease α-synuclein-induced microglial reactivity.

**Keywords** Primary microglia · Mutant alpha-synuclein · Inflammation · Apomorphine · Transcription factor recruitment

## Abbreviations

α-syn Alpha-synuclein

α-Tub Alpha-tubulin

AP-1 Activator protein 1

Tony Heurtaux
tony.heurtaux@uni.lu

1 Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, L-4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

2 Department of Life Sciences and Medicine (DLSM), University of Luxembourg, 7, Avenue des Hauts Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

3 Luxembourg Center of Neuropathology (LCNP), L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg

4 Department of Oncology (DONC), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1526 Strassen, Luxembourg

5 Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

6 CNRS, CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France

7 National Center of Pathology (NCP), Laboratoire National de Santé (LNS), L-3555 Dudelange, Luxembourg

Apo Apomorphine

ARE Antioxidant response element

cAMP Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CNS Central Nervous System

ERK Extracellular regulated kinase

HDAC1 Histone deacetylase 1

*Hmox* Heme oxygenase

HRP Horseradish peroxidase

KEAP1 Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

MACS Magnetic cell sorting

MAPK Mitogen-activated protein kinase

NFκB Nuclear factor kappa B

*Nfe2l2* Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (protein coding gene)

*Nqo1* NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1

NRF2 Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (protein)

PD Parkinson's disease

PKA Protein kinase A

R-Apo R-apomorphine

RNS Reactive nitrogen species

ROS Reactive oxygen species

S-Apo S-apomorphine
<table><tr><td>siRNA</td><td>Small interfering RNA</td></tr><tr><td>SNpc</td><td>Substantia Nigra pars compacta</td></tr><tr><td>STAT</td><td>Signal transducer and activator of transcription</td></tr><tr><td>tBHQ</td><td>Tertiary butylhydroquinone</td></tr><tr><td>WT</td><td>Wild-type</td></tr></table>

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most important neurological disorder, following Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. It has been estimated that 7–10 million people worldwide are affected by this disease. PD is clinically characterized by motor symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia, muscle stiffness, postural instability, gait difficulties and vocal symptoms, but also by additional non-motor symptoms comprising smell and gastrointestinal dysfunction, depression, anxiety, psychosis and cognitive changes (Kalia and Lang 2015). Histologically, PD is an age-related disorder characterized by a progressive loss of neurons in the pars compacta of the Substantia Nigra (Cuenca et al. 2019). These neurons produce dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps to regulate movement. Different strategies have been implemented in order to compensate for this lack of dopamine: dopamine replacement therapy (levodopa), stimulation of dopamine receptors (dopamine agonists) and other options using monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B), DOPA decarboxylase (AADC) or catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors implicated in dopamine metabolism. The first dopamine agonist, apomorphine, has been discovered by Matthiessen and Wright in the mid-1800s. However, it was only in the mid-1900s that the structural similarity between apomorphine and dopamine has been established and that first trials in PD patients have been reported (Schwab et al. 1951). Due to its low bioavailability, short duration of action and side-effects, apomorphine has been replaced by levodopa (Boyle and Ondo 2015; Jenner and Katzenschlager 2016). However, levodopa monotherapy presented some limitations as advanced stage PD patients suffer from motor and non-motor complications (Rascol et al. 2003; LeWitt and Fahn 2016). In combination with levodopa, subcutaneous infusions of apomorphine partially alleviated these persistent motor complications, but resulted in a pronounced improvement in the time periods when therapy was no longer as effective (Boyle and Ondo 2015; Katzenschlager et al. 2018; Pessoa et al. 2018; Antonini and Jenner 2018).

Based on its physicochemical properties, apomorphine is a chiral molecule existing as two enantiomers: R- and S-apomorphine. The R-isomer of apomorphine is a dopamine D1/D2 receptor agonist, acting both pre- and post-synaptically, whereas the S-isomer is devoid of dopamine receptor agonist activities. Previous studies suggest that apomorphine might be neuroprotective (Grünblatt et al. 2001; Hara et al. 2006;

Mead et al. 2013). Both enantiomers also possess antioxidant activity governed by the activation of the Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2/Antioxidant response element (NRF2/ARE) signalling pathway (Hara et al. 2006; Mead et al. 2013). The NRF2 transcription factor is known to regulate a vast array of genes (Papp et al. 2012; Tonelli et al. 2018) and to be linked to beneficial but also deleterious effects in health disorders (Hybertson and Gao 2014; Cuadrado et al. 2018). The regulation of NRF2 activities is the subject of extensive research. Controlling inflammation is one of the crucial roles of NRF2. It has been indeed reported that recruiting the NRF2 transcription factor can decrease neuroinflammation (Innamorato et al. 2008; Kobayashi et al. 2016; Han et al. 2019; Sivandzade et al. 2019a) whereas attenuating it does the opposite and might disturb brain homeostasis (Sandberg et al. 2014; Tarantini et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2020). In the last 5 years, many studies highlighted NRF2 as a potential therapeutic target to treat neurodegenerative diseases (Lastres-Becker et al. 2016; Skibinski et al. 2017; Deshmukh et al. 2017; Dinkova-Kostova et al. 2018; Petrillo et al. 2020; Brandes and Gray 2020). A likely role for neuroinflammation in PD has been reported (Kempuraj et al. 2017; Gelders et al. 2018; Troncoso-Escudero et al. 2018). Clinical and preclinical evidence linking neuroinflammation to PD have been described in postmortem collected brain tissues, blood or cerebrospinal fluid samples as well as in transgenic or neurotoxin-based animal models (McGeer et al. 2001; Perry 2012; Gelders et al. 2018). Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) are found to be increased in these PD-related biological samples.

PD is also characterized by the presence of proteinaceous insoluble inclusions, called Lewy bodies, containing a high concentration of α-synuclein (α-syn) (Spillantini et al. 1997). Its accumulation causes the death of dopaminergic neurons and leads to the loss of the nigrostriatal pathway (Lundblad et al. 2012). While most of PD cases are sporadic, mutations of the gene encoding the α-syn protein (Snca), cause inherited forms of PD (Polymeropoulos et al. 1997; Schneider and Alcalay 2017; Lunati et al. 2018). Pathological mutated or aggregated α-synuclein exacerbates the progression of PD through microglial activation (Tang and Le 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; Heneka et al. 2018; Duffy et al. 2018; Grozdanov et al. 2019). In a previous study, we reported that wild-type α-synuclein (WT) and three well-characterized mutant forms (A30P, A53T and E46K) differentially activate primary mouse microglial cultures (Hoenen et al. 2016). Indeed, exposure to A53T was able to increase the pro-inflammatory phenotype in comparison to the other α-synuclein proteins (A53T > A30P > WT > E46K).

Microglia are the tissue-resident macrophages of the brain. This complex population of immune cells is the first line of defence to all types of CNS disorders. Reactive

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>
microglia, through various pattern recognition receptors, are known to secrete high levels of pro-inflammatory mediators, growth factors, cell surface molecules as well as reactive species (ROS/RNS). The increase in these neurotoxic molecules promotes neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration (Kempuraj et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2016). To maintain a healthy tissue environment, microglia express a large variety of receptors for cytokines, chemokines, neurohormones, neuromodulators and neurotransmitters (Harry 2013). The presence of dopaminergic receptors on microglia was first established by Färber and collaborators (Färber et al. 2005). There is increasing evidence that chronic stimulation of neurotransmitter receptors may attenuate microglial activation (Färber et al. 2005; Dominguez-Meijide et al. 2017). Therefore, we explored whether apomorphine enantiomers are able to alleviate microglial cells by reducing the pro-inflammatory state induced by an A53T mutant α-synuclein exposure. For the first time, our study shows that in addition to be a dopamine receptor agonist, apomorphine plays a beneficial role by reducing microglial reactivity in a PD-like context through the activation of the NRF2-signalling pathway.

# Materials and Methods

## Ethics Statement

The Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (AEEC) of the University of Luxembourg and the relevant government agencies approved our animal experiments. Besides, all the procedures were performed following the 2010/63/EU European Union Directive.

## Alpha-Synuclein

Purified recombinant human α-synuclein (A53T mutant protein; AJ Roboscreen GmbH, Germany) was resuspended in sterile H₂O to reach a final concentration of 100 µM. Endotoxin contamination was assessed with the PYROGENT™ Plus Gel Clot LAL Single Test Vials kit (Lonza, Belgium). Briefly, this test is based on a visual inspection of a gel clot formation at 37 °C due to the presence of endotoxins. A lipopolysaccharide standard curve determined the sensitivity of the LAL kit at 0.01 ng/ml (0.03 U/ml according to the provider's datasheet). A53T α-synuclein aliquots (100 µM) were stored at –20 °C until use.

## Primary Microglia Cultures and Treatments

Mixed glial cell cultures were derived from the brains of newborn C57BL/6J mice (Harlan, The Netherlands) (Losciuto et al. 2012). Since the number of extracted

microglia cells from one newborn mouse brain only ranged between 0.5 and 0.7 million cells (0.6 million in average), we had to pool microglial cells from multiple newborn mice before starting the respective experiments. For the current study, a total number of 300 million microglial cells was used deriving from an approximated equivalent of 500 mice. Meninges and large blood vessels were removed. Brains were then minced and mechanically dissociated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. Afterwards, cells were plated in culture medium composed of Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Mixed glial cell cultures grew at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ humidified atmosphere. When confluency was reached, two weeks later, microglial cells were isolated using an anti-CD11b antibody and a magnetic cell sorting (MACS) method following the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, The Netherlands). Microglial cells were then plated in culture medium composed of mixed glial cell culture-conditioned medium and DMEM (50/50, v/v). Twenty-four hours after seeding, microglial cultures were treated with 5 µM of A53T α-synuclein, 20 µM of apomorphine enantiomers (Sigma) or with 5 nM trigonelline (Sigma). In addition, a siRNA-mediated gene silencing approach has also been established on these primary cultures (see the RNA silencing section). For control conditions, we treated the cells using the same volume of vehicle (sterile water) as used in the A53T condition.

The cellular viability was evaluated after each treatment using the MTT method (ability of mitochondrial dehydrogenases from healthy cells to convert MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) to coloured insoluble formazan crystals) and the LDH cytotoxicity assay [measuring the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the supernatant upon release by damaged cells] (Hoenen et al. 2016).

## Phagocytosis Assay

Primary microglial cells were seeded at a density of 2.5×10⁵ cells/well into 48-well plates. Cells were incubated for 24 h with the different compounds. Briefly, yellow-green carboxylate-modified FluoSpheres® (1 µm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Belgium) were resuspended in 25 mM Na₂HPO₄, pH 6.0, buffer containing 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and water-bath sonicated for 15 min at 25 °C. At the end of the treatment time, the sonicated suspension (2×10⁹ microspheres in 12.5 µl) was added to the microglia cultures. The incubation was maintained at 37 °C for 75 min. After three PBS washing steps, a Trypan blue solution (0.1% final) was added in each well in order to quench the extracellular fluorescence (non-phagocytized beads). Fluorescence was measured in a FLUOstar OPTIMA microplate reader (BMG
Labtech, Offenburg, Germany) at 520 nm under excitation at 485 nm.

## Immunocytochemistry

Poly-L-lysine coated coverslips were used when seeding microglia at a density of $3 \times 10^5$ cells/well into 24-well plates (Hoenen et al. 2016). After 6 h of treatments, cells were successively fixed for 20 min at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), permeabilized for 5 min in 0.3% Triton X100 in PBS and washed three times with PBS. For the blocking step, cells were incubated for 30 min with 3% (w/v) BSA at room temperature. Microglial cells were stained overnight at 4 °C using a rabbit anti-IBA1 antibody (1:300, Biocare Medical, USA), a rat anti-F4/80 antibody (1:300, Bio-Rad, Belgium), or a rabbit anti-NRF2 antibody (1:300, Invitrogen, Belgium). The next day, cells were incubated with an Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Belgium), an Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-rat secondary antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Belgium), or an Alexa Fluor® 568-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Belgium) for one hour at room temperature. Finally, the glass slides containing the cells were washed in PBS, and were mounted with DAPI Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, USA). Pictures were acquired using an LSM 510 META inverted confocal microscope at a $40 \times$ magnification (Carl Zeiss Micro Imaging, Göttingen, Germany). The open source image-processing software package Fiji® was used to establish microglial cell areas (µm²). Regarding the detection of NRF2 in nuclei, pictures were acquired at a $60 \times$ magnification using an Andor Revolution W1 Spinning Disk Confocal system, mounted on a Nikon Ti microscope using Nikon Imaging Software (NIS).

## RNA Silencing

For the silencing of *Nfe2l2*, we used *Nfe2l2*-targeted siRNA. Primary microglial cells were seeded at a density of $4 \times 10^5$ cells/well into 24-well plates. Cells were transfected 24 h later with 30 nM *Nfe2l2* small interfering RNA (siRNA) or negative control siRNA (Eurogentec, Belgium) using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX reagent (Life Technologies, Belgium).

The synthetic *Nfe2l2* siRNAs duplexes are 5'-GACAAG AGCAACUCCAGAAdTdT-3' and 5'-UUCUGGAGUUGC UCUUGUCdTdT-3'. Following the manufacturer's instructions, siRNAs and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX were prepared in DMEM, premixed for 5 min and applied to the cells. Following 24 h of transfection, cells were then treated for 6 h with A53T with or without apomorphine enantiomers and

harvested for total RNA extraction followed by gene expression analyses.

## RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription and PCR

Primary microglial cells were seeded at a density of $6 \times 10^5$ cells/well into 12-well plates. Total RNA was extracted after treatments using the innuPREP RNA Kits (Westburg, The Netherlands) following the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was made with the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, The Netherlands). For PCR analyses, iQ™ SYBR Green Supermix (Promega) and synthesized complementary DNA (cDNA) were used on a Bio-Rad iCycler (iQ5 Real-Time PCR Detection System, Bio-Rad). Primer sequences are summarized in Table 1. Gene expression was calculated with the comparative threshold cycle ($C_t$) method using the $2^{-ddCt}$ formula, with $ddCt = (C_{t, target} - C_{t, Rpl27})$ treated sample - ($C_{t, target} - C_{t, Rpl27}$)control sample. To normalize the target genes, *Rpl27* was used as the housekeeping gene (coding for a ribosomal protein).

## Quantification of Pro-Inflammatory Mediators

Supernatants were collected after treatments performed in 12-well plates ($6 \times 10^5$ cells/well) for 6 h. The production of prostaglandins $E_2$ (PGE₂), CXCL10 and TNFα was quantified with an Enzyme ImmunoAssay kit (Assay Designs, USA) or a sandwich Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (R&D Systems, USA). A microplate reader (TECAN) was used to measure the absorbance at 540 nm and a 4-parameter logistic (4PL) standard curve fit led us to calculate protein concentrations.

## Western Blot

Following 3 h of treatments, total proteins were extracted from 6-well plates ($1 \times 10^6$ cells/well) with RIPA buffer containing 1% phosphatase/protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were extracted from 25 cm² flasks (density of $4 \times 10^6$ cells/flask), after 2 h of treatments, using the nuclear extract kit (Active Motif, CA). Protein levels were determined by the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit.

Twenty µg (total and cytoplasmic proteins) or 10 µg (nuclear proteins) were loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated with either anti-ERK (rabbit, 1:20,000 dilution, ref. M5670, Sigma), anti-phospho-ERK (rabbit, 1:2000 dilution, ref. 4370, Bioke), anti-p38 (rabbit, 1:1000 dilution, ref. 506,123, Calbiochem), anti-phospho-p38 (rabbit, 1:1000 dilution, ref. 4511, Bioke), anti-STAT1 (mouse, 1:500 dilution, ref. BD610116, BD Biosciences),
<table><caption>**Table 1** Sequences of the different real-time PCR primers</caption><thead><tr><th>Target gene<br>(Accession number)</th><th>Forward</th><th>Reverse</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Cxcl10<br>(NM_021274)</td><td>TTCTGCCTCATCCTGCTG</td><td>AGACATCTCTGCTCATCATTC</td></tr><tr><td>Drd1<br>(NM_010076)</td><td>CAGACACAAATAAACACAAGGTA</td><td>AACATTCAGAACACAATAGTAGC</td></tr><tr><td>Drd2<br>(NM_010077)</td><td>ACTCAGATGCTTGCCATTG</td><td>GGATGTGCGTGATGAAGAA</td></tr><tr><td>Drd3<br>(NM_007877)</td><td>CTACGCCCTGTCCTACTGT</td><td>CCACCTGTCACCTCCAAG</td></tr><tr><td>Drd4<br>(NM_007878)</td><td>GTGTTGGACGCCTTTCTTCG</td><td>GGGTTGAGGGCACTGTTGA</td></tr><tr><td>Drd5<br>(NM_013503)</td><td>CTGCGAGCATCCATCAAG</td><td>CACAAGGGAAGCCAGTCC</td></tr><tr><td>Hmox1<br>(NM_010442)</td><td>TCAGAAGGGTCAGGTGTC</td><td>TCAGGGAAGTAGAGTGGG</td></tr><tr><td>Hmox2<br>(NM_001136066)</td><td>CACAACTACTCAGCCAC</td><td>CTTGGTCCCTTCCTTCAG</td></tr><tr><td>Nfe2l2<br>(NM_010902)</td><td>TGAAGCTCAGCTCGCATTGA</td><td>TGGGCGGCGACTTTATTCTT</td></tr><tr><td>Nos2<br>(NM_010927)</td><td>AGCCCTCACCTACTTCCTG</td><td>CAATCTCTGCCTATCCGTCTC</td></tr><tr><td>Nqo1<br>(NM_008706)</td><td>GGTAGCGGCTCCATGTACTC</td><td>CATCCTTCCAGGATCTGCAT</td></tr><tr><td>Ptgs2<br>(NM_011198)</td><td>GCCTGGTCTGATGATGTATGC</td><td>GAGTATGAGTCTGCTGGTTTGG</td></tr><tr><td>Rpl27<br>(NM_011289)</td><td>ACATTGACGATGGCACCTC</td><td>GCTTGGCGATCTTCTTCTTG</td></tr><tr><td>Tnf<br>(NM_013693)</td><td>GGTTCTGTCCCTTTCACTCAC</td><td>TGCCTCTTCTGCCAGTTCC</td></tr></tbody></table>

All the mouse primer sequences (5'-3') have been generated using the Primer3/BLAST tool

anti-phospho-STAT1 (rabbit, 1:1000 dilution, ref. 7649, Bioke), anti-α-tubulin (mouse, 1:5000 dilution, ref. ab7291, AbCam), anti-NRF2 (rabbit, 1:500 dilution, ref. PA5-27,882, Invitrogen) or anti-HDAC1 (mouse, 1:2000 dilution, ref. ab46985, AbCam) antibody. After washing steps, membranes were incubated with an anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibody (1:2000 dilution, ref. NXA931 and NA934, Amersham Biosciences). Proteins of interest were revealed using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce) on a ChemiDoc™ XRS + System (Bio-Rad).

## Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) was used to assess significant differences. Results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from a minimum of three independent experiments. Differences between treatments were analysed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey's multiple comparisons test. When normality could not be established, different group mean values were compared using a non-parametric

analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) followed by a Dunn's post-hoc test. For real-time PCR data, the statistical analysis of gene expression was performed on the delta-Ct values ($C_{\text{gene of interest}} - C_{\text{housekeeping gene}}$). The analyses of protein release quantification data as well as the quantification of the different proteins detected by western-blot (ratios) were performed on log-transformed data. Differences between groups were considered as significant when $p$ values were less than 0.05.

## Results

### Apomorphine Co-Treatment Decreases A53T-Induced Microglial Reactivity and Modulates Phagocytosis Capacity

Primary microglia were exposed to the A53T mutant α-synuclein protein. We first confirmed that our α-synuclein preparation was free of endotoxin contamination (LAL assays; data not shown). Furthermore, MTT and LDH assays showed no viability changes following exposure of
our cultures to α-synuclein, apomorphine, trigonelline and siRNAs (data not shown).

Upon A53T exposure, microglial morphology changed considerably as observed by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 1a). Indeed, the area covered by microglial cells (Fig. 1b) was strongly increased (2.1-fold compared to control condition). When co-treated with R-apomorphine and A53T protein, normal cell morphology was restored. In this condition, the cell area was similar to the control condition (Fig. 1b). S-apomorphine co-treatment partially reduced the increase of cell area induced by the presence of the A53T protein (–70% compared to the A53T condition). It should be noted that no change of morphology was observed after single treatment with each apomorphine enantiomer. Furthermore, no significant change in cell proliferation was observed in all conditions (data not shown).

In addition to these morphological changes, we also assessed the treatment effects on the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in microglial cells by real-time PCR (Fig. 2). Transcription levels of *Cxcl10*, *Nos2*, *Ptgs2* and *Tnf* were strongly increased 6 h after the treatment with A53T. Apomorphine co-treatments were able to significantly decrease the A53T-induced up-regulation of these pro-inflammatory genes by 60% for *Nos2*, 45% for *Tnf* and 65% for *Ptgs2*, whereas for *Cxcl10* expression, the decrease was not significant (p = 0.08). Interestingly, the downregulation of these pro-inflammatory gene expression levels appeared to be enantiomer-independent. Finally, both apomorphine enantiomers alone had no effect on the expression of these pro-inflammatory genes.

As a result of *Cxcl10*, *Ptgs2* and *Tnf* gene upregulation, the release of CXCL10, PGE₂ and TNFα increased significantly 6 h after A53T treatment (Fig. 3). Co-treatments with apomorphine enantiomers partially reduced the production of these pro-inflammatory mediators in an enantiomer-independent manner. Thus, R/S-apomorphine reduced the A53T-induced TNFα, CXCL10 and PGE₂ releases by 35%, 30% and 75%, respectively. Single treatments with apomorphine enantiomers did not affect the production of these pro-inflammatory mediators.

After 24 h of microglial exposure to A53T protein, phagocytosis activity was increased by 2.1-fold (Fig. 4). Co-treatments with both apomorphine enantiomers totally inhibited the increase in phagocytosis.

## JAK-STAT and MAPK Signalling Pathways are Regulated by R/S-Apomorphine Enantiomers in A53T-Activated Microglial Cells

To decipher the involved mechanisms in our study, total proteins were extracted after 3 h of A53T exposure. In this condition, phosphor-STAT1 (pSTAT1), phospho-p38 (pp38) and phospho-ERK (pERK) expression were significantly

increased compared to the control condition (Fig. 5a, b). Concomitantly, levels of non-phosphorylated STAT1, p38 and ERK protein expression remained unchanged. Compared to A53T treatment alone, the addition of R-apomorphine increased the phosphorylation of STAT1 (+68%) but decreased the phosphorylation of p38 (–38%) whereas pERK expression remained unchanged. Furthermore, co-treatment with S-apomorphine strongly decreased the phosphorylation of STAT1, p38 and ERK by 26%, 80% and 40%, respectively.

Of note, A53T exposure alone or in combination with apomorphine enantiomers was not able to modulate JNK and phospho-JNK MAPK expression in microglia (data not shown).

## R/S-Apomorphine Treatments Increase the Nuclear Recruitment of NRF2 and Expression of NRF2-Target Genes (*Hmox1*, *Nqo1*)

We determined NRF2 protein levels in both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of microglial cells (Fig. 6a, b). These results highlighted a decrease of cytoplasmic NRF2 protein upon A53T exposure (–55%) as well as with both apomorphine enantiomers alone by –35% for the R-Apo and –65% for the S-Apo, respectively. Furthermore, co-treatments with A53T and apomorphine enantiomers reduced the cytoplasmic NRF2 level by 50% as compared to the control. As a result of a decrease of cytoplasmic NRF2, we observed an increase of nuclear NRF2 recruitment in all experimental conditions. Indeed, the nuclear NRF2 translocation was increased upon A53T exposure (2.3-fold) as well as upon R-Apo (2.2-fold) and S-Apo (2.5-fold) exposure. Co-treatments with A53T and R-Apo or S-Apo induced a higher NRF2 recruitment, which appeared to be enantiomer independent (approximatively 3.5-fold stronger compared to control condition and 1.6-fold stronger compared to A53T exposure alone). The nuclear localization of NRF2 was also evaluated by immunofluorescence (Fig. 7). Tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) was used as a positive control to induce the nuclear translocation of NRF2. Unlike the control condition, all treatments increased the fluorescence intensity in the nucleus (white arrows) highlighting the translocation of NRF2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. These data confirm our western-blot results (Fig. 6).

In order to validate the recruitment of NRF2 in our conditions, we assessed the gene expression of Heme Oxygenases (*Hmox1* and *Hmox2*) and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (*Nqo1*) by real-time PCR (Fig. 8). In contrast to *Hmox2*, *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* are both considered as NRF2-target genes. While treatment by either R- or S-Apo similarly increased the expression of *Hmox1* and *Nqo1*, A53T exposure did not significantly increase their expression. Furthermore, co-treatments with A53T and R-Apo or S-Apo did not differ

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Apomorphine enantiomers prevent changes in microglial cell morphology induced by A53T exposure. Primary microglia were co-treated for 6 h with the mutant A53T α-synuclein protein (5 µM) as well as with 20 µM of R-apomorphine (R-Apo) or S-apomorphine (S-Apo) (a). Cells were labelled with the microglial marker IBA1 (green) and counterstained with nuclear stain DAPI (blue). Scale bar:</figcaption></figure>

25 µm. To establish morphological changes, microglial cell areas were determined after treatments (mean±SEM of 20 measures per condition) (b). \*p<0.05, \*\*p<0.01, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); §§ p<0.01, significantly different from A53T-treated cells
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Apomorphine enantiomers down-regulate A53T-induced pro-inflammatory gene overexpression. Following exposure of primary mouse microglia to A53T protein (5 µM) and R- or S-apomorphine (20 µM) for 6 h, expressions of pro-inflammatory genes (*Cxcl10*, *Nos2*, *Ptgs2* and *Tnf*) were analysed by real-time PCR. Gene expres-</figcaption></figure>

sions were normalized to *Rpl27* expression level and control levels were fixed at 1.0. Results are given as mean ± SEM (n=4 independent experiments). \*p < 0.05, \*\*p < 0.01, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); § p < 0.05, significantly different from A53T-treated cells

regarding *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* overexpression in comparison to the effects of R-Apo or S-Apo alone. The expression of *Hmox2* did not change between all treatments.

## Inhibition of the NRF2-ARE Pathway Abrogates the Beneficial Role of Apomorphine Enantiomers

The in vitro effects of a pharmacological inhibition and genetic silencing of NRF2 were examined in our primary microglial cultures. Trigonelline, a plant alkaloid, was used as an effective inhibitor of NRF2 recruitment. Pre-treating with trigonelline (5 nM) during 1 h totally prevented the R/S-apomorphine

induced overexpression of the NRF2-target genes, *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* (Fig. 9). These treatments did not change the expression of *Hmox2*. Trigonelline exposure was also able to evenly block the anti-inflammatory effects of R-Apo or S-Apo. Indeed, pre-treating with trigonelline in addition to A53T and apomorphine restored TNFα and CXCL10 to the same protein levels as upon A53T exposure alone (Fig. 10). In these conditions, we obtained similar results for *Tnf* and *Cxcl10* gene expression assessed by real-time PCR (data not shown). To further demonstrate the contribution of the NRF2 signaling pathway, *Nfe2l2* gene knockdown model was established using *Nfe2l2* siRNA transfection. Thus, after 24 h of transfection, *Nfe2l2*

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Apomorphine enantiomers decrease the A53T-induced release of pro-inflammatory mediators. CXCL10, PGE₂ and TNFα protein releases were quantified in the supernatant of microglial cultures after treatments with A53T protein (5 µM) and R- or S-apomorphine</figcaption></figure>

(20 µM) for 6 h. Results are given as mean ± SEM (n=4 independent experiments). **p**<0.01, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); § *p*<0.05, §§ *p*<0.01, significantly different from A53T-treated cells

mRNA expression was strongly decreased by –65% (Fig. 11a). Furthermore, the results indicated that *Nfe2l2* knockdown largely inhibited the expression of *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* (Fig. 11b) and strongly decreased the anti-inflammatory effects of R- and S-apomorphine as also observed by real-time PCR for *Cxcl10*, *Nos2*, *Ptgs2* and *Tnf* expression (Fig. 12).

Discussion

The term “neuroinflammation” broadly defines the inflammatory processes occurring in the central nervous system where glial cells, in particular astrocytes and microglia, are recognized as principal players. Neuroinflammation,

neuronal dysfunction or neuronal death leading to neurodegeneration are linked to an increase of potentially neurotoxic molecules like pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, ROS and RNS. The brain resident innate immune cells, microglia, are constantly monitoring the brain. A short-term microglial activation is believed to be neuroprotective (Ekdahl et al. 2009), while a prolonged microglial activation can further increase tissue damage and negatively impact disease outcome (Block et al. 2007; Block and Hong 2007; Lull and Block 2010) and, in case of neurodegenerative diseases, contribute to neuronal depletion.

Characterized by the deposition of misfolded protein aggregates, predominantly composed of α-synuclein, and the depletion of striatal dopamine following the progressive
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 4** Microglial phagocytosis capacity is increased upon A53T exposure but can be modulated by apomorphine. Phagocytosis capacity was measured after incubation of primary microglia with the A53T mutant protein (5 µM) with or without apomorphine enantiomers co-treatments (20 µM) for 24 h. Results are given as mean ± SEM (n=3 independent experiments). \*p < 0.05, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); § p < 0.05, significantly different from A53T-treated cells</figcaption></figure>

degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the Substantia Nigra pars compacta (SNpc), Parkinson's disease is the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder. Most PD cases are sporadic but inherited PD forms can be caused by point mutations of the gene encoding α-synuclein protein. In a previous work, we described that the microglia activation level was α-synuclein protein dependent (Hoenen et al. 2016). Indeed, wild-type α-synuclein (WT α-syn) and the three corresponding mutants (A30P, A53T and E46K) differentially activate primary microglia. Exposure to A53T protein was able to activate primary murine microglial cultures more strongly through the recruitment of transcription factors such as AP-1, NFκB, and NRF2.

In our primary murine microglial culture, we have highlighted the expression of dopamine receptors (Table 2). According to their downstream signalling pathways, these G-protein coupled receptors are classified in two families called D1-like (D1, D5) and D2-like receptors (D2, D3 and D4). Both families have opposite effects: D1-like receptors

promote the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), while D2-like receptors family suppresses cAMP production (Missale et al. 1998; Gurevich et al. 2016; Xia et al. 2019). Considering the Brain RNA-Seq data from Barres' Lab (www.brainrnaseq.org), the expression levels of the different dopamine receptors (Drd1–Drd5) are much lower in microglia than in neuronal cells (Wei et al. 2018; Mishra et al. 2018). Depending on the agonists/antagonists used, recent works showed that modulating dopamine receptors could reduce or even prevent microglial polarization towards a pro-inflammatory state (Huck et al. 2015; Kalkman and Feuerbach 2016; Dominguez-Meijide et al. 2017; Fan et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2018). Targeting dopaminergic receptors might provide an opportunity to control neuroinflammation thereby improving some CNS diseases. Commonly used as an antiparkinsonian drug, apomorphine has been described to be the most effective dopamine agonist when subcutaneously administrated (Carbone et al. 2019). This chiral molecule is a non-selective dopamine receptor agonist, which activates both D1/D2 receptor families. Contrary to the R-apomorphine, the S-isomer lacks dopamine receptor agonist activity (Li et al. 2006).

Our in vitro data showed that apomorphine co-treatments decreased the A53T-induced microglial reactivity. A change in morphology is a known hallmark of microglial activation. Apomorphine co-treatments totally (R-Apo) or partially (S-Apo) prevented the increase of the microglial cell area observed upon A53T exposure (Fig. 1). Both enantiomers strongly decreased the overexpression (Fig. 2) of pro-inflammatory markers (Nos2, Tnf, Ptgs2, Cxcl10) as well as the release of the corresponding mediators (TNFα, PGE₂, CXCL10) (Fig. 3) induced by the presence of the A53T mutant. These results are consistent with the observed changes in cell morphology (Fig. 1). Moreover, R-Apo and S-Apo totally restored microglial phagocytosis capacity back to control level (Fig. 4). Thus, both enantiomers were able to decrease A53T effects on primary murine microglia to a similar extent. However, these inhibitory effects appear to be isomer independent. Since S-apomorphine lacks dopamine receptor agonist activity, it is likely that the observed effects of R-Apo are dopamine receptor independent.

The signal transduction was subsequently evaluated in our different experimental conditions. As previously described (Hoenen et al. 2016), an A53T exposure induced
**Fig. 5** A53T-induced STAT1 phosphorylation and MAPKs activation are modulated following apomorphine exposure. After 3 h of co-treatments with A53T protein (5 µM) and apomorphine enantiomers (20 µM), microglia lysates were subjected to western-blot analysis (a) to determine the expression of phosphorylated forms of ERK (pERK), p38 (pp38) and STAT1 (pSTAT1). α-Tubulin (αTub) was used as a reference protein. Phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated proteins ratios, called pERK/ERK, pp38/p38 and pSTAT1/STAT1, are shown in b. Results are given as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. \*p < 0.05, \*\*p < 0.01, \*\*\*p < 0.005, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); §p < 0.05, §§p < 0.005 significantly different from A53T-treated cells

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>b</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>
a

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

b

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 6** Apomorphine enantiomers induce nuclear recruitment of NRF2. The localization of NRF2 protein was evaluated after a 5 µM A53T and 20 µM apomorphine enantiomers exposure for 2 h on microglial cells (a). Cytoplasmic and nuclear NRF2 protein expression (80 kDa) was evaluated in our experimental conditions. α-Tubulin (αTub, 50 kDa) and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1,

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

55 kDa) were used as reference proteins. Detected proteins were then quantified and normalized (b). Results are given as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. \*p < 0.05, \*\*p < 0.01, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); § p < 0.05 significantly different from A53T-treated cells
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 7** NRF2 transcription factor translocates to the nucleus upon apomorphine exposure. Primary microglia were co-treated for 6 h with the mutant A53T α-synuclein protein (5 µM) as well as with 20 µM of R-apomorphine (R-Apo) or S-apomorphine (S-Apo). Tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) was used as a positive control for NRF2</figcaption></figure>

nuclear translocation. Cells were labelled for the microglial marker F4/80 (green) or NRF2 (red) and counterstained with nuclear stain DAPI (blue). White arrows point to nuclear localization of NRF2. Scale bar: 25 µm

the phosphorylation of STAT1, p38 and ERK MAPK in murine microglia (Fig. 5). A co-treatment with S-Apo partially reduced A53T-induced phosphorylation of these three proteins. On the other side, R-Apo/A53T co-treatment reduced more slightly the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK. It should also be noted that this R-Apo/A53T co-treatment did not decrease the recruitment of ERK and even increased the phosphorylation level of STAT1. It has been described that ERK activation can act downstream of STAT signalling during microglial activation (Kim et al. 2002; Tichauer et al. 2007), therefore confirming our findings. Finally, apomorphine enantiomers modulated the MAPK phosphorylation in activated microglia, but not in “resting” microglia (control condition).

In addition to its action on dopaminergic receptors, apomorphine is also a powerful antioxidant and free radical scavenger (Ribarič 2012). These apomorphine effects have been shown in both in vitro and in vivo experiments (Gassen et al. 1996; Grünblatt et al. 1999; Hara et al. 2006; Mead et al. 2013). Several previous studies described that apomorphine, a catechol derivative, is able to activate the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1-Nfe2l2-Antioxidant Response Element pathway, commonly called KEAP1-NRF2-ARE pathway, in the mammalian CNS (Hara et al. 2006; Mead et al. 2013). Based on its chemical properties, it has been described that apomorphine autoxidation occurs spontaneously resulting in the formation of quinone derivatives and ROS (Kaul and Brochmann-Hanssen 1961; El-Bachá
<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 8** Apomorphine enantiomers upregulate NRF2-target genes. Following exposure of primary mouse microglial cells to A53T protein (5 µM) and apomorphine enantiomers (20 µM) for 6 h, heme oxygenase-1 (*Hmox1*), heme oxygenase-2 (*Hmox2*), and NAD(P) H Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 (*Nqo1*) expressions were analysed by</figcaption></figure>

real-time PCR. Gene expressions were normalized to *Rpl27* expression level and control levels were fixed at 1.0. Results are given as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. \*p < 0.05, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); §p < 0.05 significantly different from A53T-treated cells

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 9** Trigonelline exposure inhibits the recruitment of NRF2 trans-cription factor. Primary microglial cultures were pretreated for 1 h with 5 nM trigonelline. Cells were then treated for 6 h with apo-morphine enantiomers (20 µM). Heme oxygenase-1 (Hmox1), heme oxygenase-2 (Hmox2), and NAD(P)H Quinone Oxidoreductase 1</figcaption></figure>

(Nqo1) expressions were analysed by real-time PCR. Gene expres-sions were normalized to Rpl27 expression level. Results are given as mean±SEM (n=4 independent experiments). \*p<0.05, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells)
<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 10** Trigonelline exposure abolishes the effects of apomorphine enantiomers on microglial reactivity. CXCL10 and TNFα protein releases were quantified by ELISA in the supernatant of microglial cultures after 1 h of pre-treatment with 5 nM trigonelline followed by 6 h of co-treatments with the A53T protein (5 µM) and apomorphine enantiomers (20 µM). Results are given as mean ± SEM (n=4 independent experiments). \*\*p < 0.01, significantly different from control condition (untreated cells); § p < 0.05, significantly different from A53T-treated cells; # p < 0.05, significantly different from the same treatment without trigonelline</figcaption></figure>

et al. 2000; Hara et al. 2006). ROS play a critical role in the dissociation of the weak interaction between KEAP1 and NRF2, the two protagonists of the NRF2 signalling pathway (Wakabayashi et al. 2004; Hayes et al. 2010). Detached from KEAP1, NRF2 translocates into the nucleus and transactivates a battery of genes containing ARE sequences (Consensus motif: 5'-TGACnnnGC-3'). This NRF2 transcription factor regulates gene responses to prevent oxidative cell damage, inflammation and tumorigenesis (Johnson et al. 2008; Sivandzade et al. 2019b). Many genes encoding detoxification and antioxidant enzymes have been described to be NRF2-dependent (Ahmed et al. 2017).

We previously described that A53T exposure increases the nuclear translocation of the NFκB p65 subunit in primary microglia (Hoenen et al. 2016). However, it is assumed that NRF2 negatively regulates NFκB signalling (Thimmulappa et al. 2006; Bellezza et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2020). Therefore, our results suggest that the NRF2 recruitment inhibits the overexpression of pro-inflammatory genes by interfering with the p65-mediated transcriptional activity (Kobayashi et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2020). Herein, we established a nuclear NRF2 recruitment after 2 h of treatments which can be explained by the dissociation of the NRF2-KEAP1 complex. This is confirmed by an increase of the NRF2 level in the nucleus concomitant to a decrease in the cytoplasmic compartment (Fig. 6a, b). We have thus shown that R- and S-apomorphine treatments induced a NRF2 translocation upon A53T exposure in microglial cells. This is in accordance with the ability of A53T to generate ROS in our microglial cultures (Hoenen et al. 2016). In addition, NRF2 levels in the nucleus were higher upon A53T/apomorphine co-treatments. Immunofluorescent analyses also confirmed the significant increase of NRF2 levels in the nucleus (Fig. 7). To prove the activation of the NRF2 pathway, we focused on its target genes, heme oxygenase-1 (*Hmox1*) and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (*Nqo1*) (Kansanen et al. 2013; Loboda et al. 2016). After 6 h of treatments, R-Apo and S-Apo alone or in co-treatment with the A53T protein were able to increase *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* expression (Fig. 8). Both apomorphine enantiomers upregulated *Hmox1* and *Nqo1* expression in a same manner. In contrast, another member of the heme oxygenase family, *Hmox2*, a gene not inducible by NRF2, was not sensitive to the different treatments. Even though NRF2 was translocated into the nucleus 2 h after A53T treatment, the expression of *Hmox1* and *Nqo1*
did not appear to be significantly upregulated in this condi-
tion after 6 h (p = 0.078 and 0.091, respectively).

We subsequently wanted to confirm that the activation
of NRF2 signalling contributed to the apomorphine effects
on microglia. To tackle this question, the use of the NRF2
inhibitor trigonelline (Boettler et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2012)
allowed us to inhibit the nuclear recruitment of this tran-
scription factor (Fig. 9) and to significantly block the anti-
inflammatory effects of apomorphine (Fig. 10). Furthermore,
the use of specific Nfe2l2 siRNA confirmed the pivotal role
of the NRF2 pathway in the anti-inflammatory mechanism of
apomorphine. Indeed, Nfe2l2 siRNA did not only decrease
the expression of Nfe2l2 and its target genes (Fig. 11) but
also restored the inflammatory conditions linked to the
presence of A53T and the subsequent microglial reactivity
(Fig. 12). As discussed above, this confirms the interaction
between NRF2 and NFκB signalling pathways. Our results
are in accordance with Malhotra and collaborators (Malhotra
et al. 2010), who established that NRF2 signalling pathway
can regulate more than 600 genes, of which more than 200
encode cytoprotective proteins associated with inflammatory
and neurodegenerative diseases (Papp et al. 2012; Hayes and
Dinkova-Kostova 2014; Ahmed et al. 2017).

Unlike R-apomorphine which is a dopamine receptor ago-
nist, the S-isomer has, to our knowledge, no known recep-
tor. However, we have described that both enantiomers are
equally potent in terms of NRF2 pathway activation. This is in
accordance with the study reported by Mead and collaborators
(Mead et al. 2013). Based on our results, both enantiomers of
apomorphine showed the same effects on the A53T-induced
primary microglia reactivity. Indeed, S-Apo but also R-Apo
reduced microglial reactivity by a unique NRF2-dependent
mechanism. This was confirmed by the use of trigonelline
but also by a gene silencing approach. It is important to note
that, even if the effects on microglial reactivity are similar for
both enantiomers, we were able to highlight some differences
in terms of MAPK activation. These disparities on MAPK
phosphorylation status might indicate that the R-isomer might
partially bind to the dopamine receptors. It has indeed been

reported that the activation of dopaminergic receptors leads
to the activation of MAPK pathway by especially increasing
ERK phosphorylation (Li et al. 2006; Cahill et al. 2014; Mari-
ani et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020) resulting in a subsequent
STAT1 phosphorylation (Kim et al. 2002; Tichauer et al. 2007;
Song et al. 2017). The differential MAPK and JAK-STAT
signaling pathways responses seem then to be independent of
the recruitment of the NRF2 transcription factor. Finally, the
R-Apo impact is likely linked to its antioxidant property to
activate the NRF2 pathway rather than to its binding to dopa-
mine receptors.

Conclusion

Taken together, our work described how apomorphine treat-
ment modulates microglial activation. Using enantiomers of
apomorphine, we showed that R-Apo, a dopamine agonist,
but also the S-Apo, which lacks dopamine receptor agonist
activity, similarly decreased the microglial reactivity induced
upon an A53T exposure. In our in vitro experimental condi-
tions, apomorphine treatment rapidly decreased microglial
reactivity. As underlying mechanism, we showed that activa-
tion of the NRF2/ARE pathway decreased the A53T mutant
α-synuclein-induced microglial reactivity. The recruitment
of the NRF2 transcription factor regulates the cellular redox
status (*Hmox1* and *Nqo1* overexpression), decreases the
overexpression of pro-inflammatory genes as well as the
release of pro-inflammatory mediators and finally restores
the microglial phagocytosis capacity. Known to be a criti-
cal transcriptional activator for antioxidant responses, NRF2
also appeared to be a powerful modulator in the course and/
or outcome of inflammatory diseases and neurodegenera-
tive diseases (Staurengo-Ferrari et al. 2018; Bahn and Jo
2019). Although our results may be pertinent to neurode-
generative diseases involving inflammation, further experi-
ments are needed to better understand the importance of the
KEAP1-NRF2-ARE pathway in the brain and its potential
therapeutics impact.
<caption>a</caption>

Nfe2l2

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /><figcaption>b</figcaption></figure>

Nfe2l2

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

Hmox1

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /></figure>

Nqo1

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_26.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_27.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 12** *Nfe2l2* silencing reverses the anti-inflammatory properties of apomorphine. Following *Nfe2l2* inhibition, primary mouse microglia were exposed to A53T protein (5 µM) and R- or S-apomorphine (20 µM) for 6 h. Expressions of pro-inflammatory genes (*Cxcl10*, *Nos2*, *Ptgs2* and *Tnf*) were analysed by real-time PCR. Gene expres-</figcaption></figure>

the A53T protein (5 µM) and apomorphine enantiomers (20 µM). *Nfe2l2*, *Hmox1*, and *Nqo1* expression were analysed by real-time PCR (b). Gene expression was normalized to *Rpl27* expression level and control levels (siNeg condition) were fixed at 1.0. Results are given as mean±SEM (n=4 independent experiments). \*p<0.05, \*\*p<0.01, significantly different from siNeg condition (with the same treatment)

sions were normalized to *Rpl27* expression level and control levels were fixed at 1.0. Results are given as mean±SEM (n=4 independent experiments). \*p<0.05, significantly different from siNeg condition (with the same treatment); \§p<0.05, significantly different from A53T-treated cells
<table><caption>**Table 2** Threshold cycle ($C_t$) values of the dopamine receptor genes in primary microglia</caption><thead><tr><th>Target gene<br>(Accession number)</th><th>Primary<br>microglia (C<sub>t</sub>)<br>(mean ± SEM)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Drd1<br>(NM_010076)</td><td>31.5 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Drd2<br>(NM_010077)</td><td>36.0 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Drd3<br>(NM_007877)</td><td>35.8 ± 0.6</td></tr><tr><td>Drd4<br>(NM_007878)</td><td>32.0 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Drd5<br>(NM_013503)</td><td>31.4 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Rpl27<br>(NM_011289)</td><td>17.5 ± 0.2</td></tr></tbody></table>

$C_t$ values were determined in control condition (untreated cells) in primary microglia. Results are shown as mean ± SEM ($n=5$ independent experiments)

**Acknowledgements** We sincerely thank Dr Lasse Sinkkonen for his diligent proofreading of the manuscript. Michel Mittelbronn would like to thank the Luxembourg National Research Fond (FNR) for the support (FNR PEARL P16/BM/11192868 grant).

**Author Contributions** All authors listed contributed to this work. TH designed the study. MK, EK, PF, LR and TH performed experiments, collected results and analysed data. HS provided the Trigonelline compound. TH wrote the manuscript. MK, EK, OUH, HS and MM critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Declarations

**Conflict of interest** The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

**Ethical Approval** The Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (AEEC) of the University of Luxembourg and the relevant government agencies approved our animal experiments. Besides, all the procedures were performed following the 2010/63/EU European Union Directive.

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## References

Ahmed SMU, Luo L, Namani A et al (2017) Nrf2 signaling pathway: pivotal roles in inflammation. *Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis* 1863:585–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.005

Antonini A, Jenner P (2018) Apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson disease. *Nat Rev Neurol* 14:693–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0083-y

Bahn G, Jo D-G (2019) Therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer’s disease through modulation of NRF2. *Neuromolecular Med* 21:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12017-018-08523-5

Bellezza I, Tucci A, Galli F et al (2012) Inhibition of NF-κB nuclear translocation via HO-1 activation underlies α-tocopheryl succinate toxicity. *J Nutr Biochem* 23:1583–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.10.012

Block ML, Hong J-S (2007) Chronic microglial activation and progressive dopaminergic neurotoxicity. *Biochem Soc Trans* 35:1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0351127

Block ML, Zecca L, Hong J-S (2007) Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. *Nat Rev Neurosci* 8:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2038

Boettler U, Sommerfeld K, Volz N et al (2011) Coffee constituents as modulators of Nrf2 nuclear translocation and ARE (EpRE)-dependent gene expression. *J Nutr Biochem* 22:426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.03.011

Boyle A, Ondo W (2015) Role of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. *CNS Drugs* 29:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-014-0221-z

Brandes MS, Gray NE (2020) NRF2 as a therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases. *ASN Neuro* 12:1759091419899782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759091419899782

Cahill E, Salery M, Vanhoutte P, Caboche J (2014) Convergence of dopamine and glutamate signaling onto striatal ERK activation in response to drugs of abuse. *Front Pharmacol* 4:172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00172

Carbone F, Djamshidian A, Seppi K, Poewe W (2019) Apomorphine for Parkinson’s disease: efficacy and safety of current and new formulations. *CNS Drugs* 33:905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-019-00661-z

Chen W-W, Zhang X, Huang W-J (2016) Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (Review). *Mol Med Rep* 13:3391–3396. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4948

Cuadrado A, Manda G, Hassan A et al (2018) Transcription factor NRF2 as a therapeutic target for chronic diseases: a systems medicine approach. *Pharmacol Rev* 70:348–383. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.014753

Cuenca L, Gil-Martinez AL, Cano-Fernandez L et al (2019) Parkinson’s disease: a short story of 200 years. *Histol Histopathol* 34:573–591. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-073

Deshmukh P, Unni S, Krishnappa G, Padmanabhan B (2017) The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway: promising therapeutic target to counteract ROS-mediated damage in cancers and neurodegenerative diseases. *Biophys Rev* 9:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-016-0244-4

Dinkova-Kostova AT, Kostov RV, Kazantsev AG (2018) The role of Nrf2 signaling in counteracting neurodegenerative diseases. *FEBS J* 285:3576–3590. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14379

Dominguez-Meijide A, Rodriguez-Perez AI, Diaz-Ruiz C et al (2017) Dopamine modulates astroglial and microglial activity via glial renin-angiotensin system in cultures. *Brain Behav Immun* 62:277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.02.013

Duffy MF, Collier TJ, Patterson JR et al (2018) Lewy body-like alpha-synuclein inclusions trigger reactive microgliosis prior to nigral degeneration. *J Neuroinflammation* 15:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1171-z
Ekdahl CT, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O (2009) Brain inflammation and adult neurogenesis: the dual role of microglia. Neuroscience 158:1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.052

El-Bachá RS, Leclerc S, Netter P et al (2000) Glucuronidation of apomorphine. Life Sci 67:1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3205(00)00764-5

Fan Y, Chen Z, Pathak JL et al (2018) Differential regulation of adhesion and phagocytosis of resting and activated microglia by dopamine. Front Cell Neurosci 12:309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00309

Färber K, Pannasch U, Kettenmann H (2005) Dopamine and noradrenaline control distinct functions in rodent microglial cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 29:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2005.01.003

Gassen M, Glinka Y, Pinchasi B, Youdim MB (1996) Apomorphine is a highly potent free radical scavenger in rat brain mitochondrial fraction. Eur J Pharmacol 308:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(96)00291-9

Gelders G, Baekelandt V, Van der Perren A (2018) Linking neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. J Immunol Res 2018:4784268. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4784268

Grozdanov V, Bousset L, Hoffmeister M et al (2019) Increased Immune activation by pathologic α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 86:593–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25557

Grünblatt E, Mandel S, Gassen M, Youdim MB (1999) Potent neuroprotective and antioxidant activity of apomorphine in MPTP and 6-hydroxydopamine induced neurotoxicity. J Neural Transm Suppl 55:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6369-6_6

Grünblatt E, Mandel S, Maor G, Youdim MB (2001) Effects of R- and S-apomorphine on MPTP-induced nigro-striatal dopamine neuronal loss. J Neurochem 77:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.t01-1-00227.x

Gurevich EV, Gainetdinov RR, Gurevich VV (2016) G protein-coupled receptor kinases as regulators of dopamine receptor functions. Pharmacol Res 111:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2016.05.010

Han M, Hu L, Chen Y (2019) Rutaecarpine may improve neuronal injury, inhibits apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress by regulating the expression of ERK1/2 and Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in rats with cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Drug Des Devel Ther 13:2923–2931. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S216156

Hara H, Ohta M, Adachi T (2006) Apomorphine protects against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neuronal cell death through activation of the Nrf2-ARE pathway. J Neurosci Res 84:860–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20974

Harry GJ (2013) Microglia during development and aging. Pharmacol Ther 139:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.04.013

Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT (2014) The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci 39:199–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.002

Hayes JD, McMahon M, Chowdhry S, Dinkova-Kostova AT (2010) Cancer chemoprevention mechanisms mediated through the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Antioxid Redox Signal 13:1713–1748. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3221

Heneka MT, McManus RM, Latz E (2018) Inflammasome signalling in brain function and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 19:610–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0055-7

Hoenen C, Gustin A, Birck C et al (2016) Alpha-synuclein proteins promote pro-inflammatory cascades in microglia: stronger effects of the A53T mutant. PLoS ONE 11:e0162717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162717

Huck JHJ, Freyer D, Böttcher C et al (2015) De novo expression of dopamine D2 receptors on microglia after stroke. J Cereb Blood

Flow Metab 35:1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.128

Hybertson BM, Gao B (2014) Role of the Nrf2 signaling system in health and disease. Clin Genet 86:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12474

Innamorato NG, Rojo AI, García-Yagüe AJ et al (2008) The transcription factor Nrf2 is a therapeutic target against brain inflammation. J Immunol Baltim Md 181:680–689. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.680

Jenner P, Katzenschlager R (2016) Apomorphine—pharmacological properties and clinical trials in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 33(Suppl 1):S13–S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.12.003

Johnson JA, Johnson DA, Kraft AD et al (2008) The Nrf2-ARE pathway: an indicator and modulator of oxidative stress in neurodegeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1147:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1427.036

Kalia LV, Lang AE (2015) Parkinson's disease. Lancet Lond Engl 386:896–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3

Kalkman HO, Feuerbach D (2016) Antidepressant therapies inhibit inflammation and microglial M1-polarization. Pharmacol Ther 163:82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.001

Kansanen E, Kuosmanen SM, Leinonen H, Levonen A-L (2013) The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway: mechanisms of activation and dysregulation in cancer. Redox Biol 1:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2012.10.001

Katzenschlager R, Poewe W, Rascol O et al (2018) Apomorphine subcutaneous infusion in patients with Parkinson's disease with persistent motor fluctuations (TOLEDO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 17:749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30239-4

Kaul PN, Brochmann-Hanssen E (1961) Auto-oxidation of apomorphine. J Pharm Sci 50:266–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600500323

Kempuraj D, Thangavel R, Selvakumar GP et al (2017) Brain and peripheral atypical inflammatory mediators potentiate neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Front Cell Neurosci 11:216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00216

Kempuraj D, Thangavel R, Natteru PA et al (2016) Neuroinflammation induces neurodegeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine 1:1003

Kim M-O, Si Q, Zhou JN et al (2002) Interferon-beta activates multiple signaling cascades in primary human microglia. J Neurochem 81:1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00949.x

Kim HN, Kim JD, Park SB et al (2020) Anti-inflammatory activity of the extracts from *Rodgersia podophylla* leaves through activation of Nrf2/HO-1 pathway, and inhibition of NF-κB and MAPKs pathway in mouse macrophage cells. Inflamm Res off J Eur Histamine Res Soc Al 69:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-019-01311-2

Kobayashi EH, Suzuki T, Funayama R et al (2016) Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. Nat Commun 7:11624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11624

Lastres-Becker I, García-Yagüe AJ, Scannevin RH et al (2016) Repurposing the NRF2 activator dimethyl fumarate as therapy against synucleinopathy in Parkinson's disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 25:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6549

LeWitt PA, Fahn S (2016) Levodopa therapy for Parkinson disease: a look backward and forward. Neurology 86:S3-12. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002509

Li A, Guo H, Luo X et al (2006) Apomorphine-induced activation of dopamine receptors modulates FGF-2 expression in astrocytic cultures and promotes survival of dopaminergic neurons. FASEB 20:1263–1265. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-5510fje

Liu L, Kelly MG, Yang XR et al (2020) Nrf2 deficiency exacerbates cognitive impairment and reactive microgliosis in a
lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammatory mouse model. Cell Mol Neurobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-00807-4

Loboda A, Damulewicz M, Pyza E et al (2016) Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: an evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:3221–3247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2223-0

Losciuto S, Dorban G, Gabel S et al (2012) An efficient method to limit microglia-dependent effects in astroglial cultures. J Neurosci Methods 207:59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.03.010

Lull ME, Block ML (2010) Microglial activation and chronic neurodegeneration. Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother 7:354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.014

Lunati A, Lesage S, Brice A (2018) The genetic landscape of Parkinson's disease. Rev Neurol (Paris) 174:628–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2018.08.004

Lundblad M, Decressac M, Mattsson B, Björklund A (2012) Impaired neurotransmission caused by overexpression of α-synuclein in nigral dopamine neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3213–3219. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200575109

Malhotra D, Portales-Casamar E, Singh A et al (2010) Global mapping of binding sites for Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 38:5718–5734. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq212

Mariani L-L, Longueville S, Girault J-A et al (2019) Differential enhancement of ERK, PKA and Ca2+ signaling in direct and indirect striatal neurons of Parkinsonian mice. Neurobiol Dis 130:104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104506

McGeer PL, Yasojima K, McGeer EG (2001) Inflammation in Parkinson's disease. Adv Neurol 86:83–89

Mead RJ, Higginbottom A, Allen SP et al (2013) S[+] Apomorphine is a CNS penetrating activator of the Nrf2-ARE pathway with activity in mouse and patient fibroblast models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Free Radic Biol Med 61:438–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.018

Mishra A, Singh S, Shukla S (2018) Physiological and functional basis of dopamine receptors and their role in neurogenesis: possible implication for Parkinson's disease. J Exp Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179069518779829

Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW et al (1998) Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 78:189–225. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189

Papp D, Lenti K, Módos D et al (2012) The NRF2-related interac-tome and regulome contain multifunctional proteins and fine-tuned autoregulatory loops. FEBS Lett 586:1795–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.016

Perry VH (2012) Innate inflammation in Parkinson's disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2:a009373. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a009373

Pessoa RR, Moro A, Munhoz RP et al (2018) Apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 76:840–848. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20180140

Petrillo S, Schirinzi T, Di Lazzaro G et al (2020) Systemic activation of Nrf2 pathway in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord off J Mov Disord Soc 35:180–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27878

Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E et al (1997) Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson's disease. Science 276:2045–2047. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5321.2045

Rascol O, Payoux P, Ory F et al (2003) Limitations of current Parkinson's disease therapy. Ann Neurol 53(Suppl 3):S3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10513

Ribarič S (2012) The pharmacological properties and therapeutic use of apomorphine. Mol Basel Switz 17:5289–5309. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055289

Sandberg M, Patil J, D'Angelo B et al (2014) NRF2-regulation in brain health and disease: implication of cerebral inflammation. Neuropharmacology 79:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.11.004

Schneider SA, Alcalay RN (2017) Neuropathology of genetic synucleinopathies with parkinsonism: review of the literature. Mov Disord off J Mov Disord Soc 32:1504–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27193

Schwab RS, Amador LV, Lettvin JY (1951) Apomorphine in Parkinson's disease. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 56:251–253

Singh S, Mishra A, Srivastava N et al (2018) Acetyl-L-Carnitine via upeulating dopamine D1 receptor and attenuating microglial activation prevents neuronal loss and improves memory functions in Parkinsonian rats. Mol Neurobiol 55:583–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-016-0293-5

Sivandzade F, Bhalerao A, Cucullo L (2019a) Cerebrovascular and neurological disorders: protective role of NRF2. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143433

Sivandzade F, Prasad S, Bhalerao A, Cucullo L (2019b) NRF2 and NF-κB interplay in cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative disorders: molecular mechanisms and possible therapeutic approaches. Redox Biol 21:101059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.11.017

Skibinski G, Hwang V, Ando DM et al (2017) Nrf2 mitigates LRRK2- and α-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration by modulating proteostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:1165–1170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522872114

Song Z, Xiong B, Zheng H et al (2017) STAT1 as a downstream mediator of ERK signaling contributes to bone cancer pain by regulating MHC II expression in spinal microglia. Brain Behav Immun 60:161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.009

Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VM et al (1997) Alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies. Nature 388:839–840. https://doi.org/10.1038/42166

Staurengo-Ferrari L, Badaro-Garcia S, Hohmann MSN et al (2018) Contribution of Nrf2 modulation to the mechanism of action of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs in pre-clinical and clinical stages. Front Pharmacol 9:1536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01536

Tang Y, Le W (2016) Differential roles of M1 and M2 microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurobiol 53:1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-014-9070-5

Tarantini S, Valcarcel-Ares MN, Yabluchanskiy A et al (2018) Nrf2 Deficiency exacerbates obesity-induced oxidative stress, neurovascular dysfunction, blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, amyloidogenic gene expression, and cognitive decline in mice, mimicking the aging phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73:853–863. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glx177

Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Rangasamy T et al (2006) Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. J Clin Invest 116:984–995. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI25790

Tichauer J, Saud K, von Bernhardi R (2007) Modulation by astrocytes of microglial cell-mediated neuroinflammation: effect on the activation of microglial signaling pathways. NeuroImmunoModulation 14:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000110642

Tonelli C, Chio IIC, Tuveson DA (2018) Transcriptional regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid Redox Signal 29:1727–1745. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7342

Troncoso-Escudero P, Parra A, Nassif M, Vidal RL (2018) Outside in: unraveling the role of neuroinflammation in the progression of Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol 9:860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00860

Wakabayashi N, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Holtzclaw WD et al (2004) Protection against electrophile and oxidant stress by induction of the phase 2 response: fate of cysteines of the Keap1 sensor modified
by inducers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2040–2045. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307301101

Wang C-X, Ge X-Y, Wang M-Y et al (2020) Dopamine D1 receptor-mediated activation of the ERK signaling pathway is involved in the osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 11:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1529-x

Wei X, Ma T, Cheng Y et al (2018) Dopamine D1 or D2 receptor-expressing neurons in the central nervous system. Addict Biol 23:569–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12512

Xia Q-P, Cheng Z-Y, He L (2019) The modulatory role of dopamine receptors in brain neuroinflammation. Int Immunopharmacol 76:105908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105908

Zhang Q-S, Heng Y, Yuan Y-H, Chen N-H (2017) Pathological α-synuclein exacerbates the progression of Parkinson’s disease through microglial activation. Toxicol Lett 265:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.11.002

Zhou J, Chan L, Zhou S (2012) Trigonelline: a plant alkaloid with therapeutic potential for diabetes and central nervous system disease. Curr Med Chem 19:3523–3531. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712801323171

**Publisher's Note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.