# Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods

Mathieu Hainselin

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

► To cite this version:

Mathieu Hainselin. Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods. Socioaffec- tive Neuroscience and Psychology, 2017, 7 (1), pp.1357413. 10.1080/20009011.2017.1357413. hal- 03377891

HAL Id: hal-03377891

https://hal.science/hal-03377891v1

Submitted on 21 Oct 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods

Mathieu Hainselin

**To cite this article:** Mathieu Hainselin (2017) Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods, Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 7:1, 1357413, DOI: 10.1080/20009011.2017.1357413

**To link to this article:** https://doi.org/10.1080/20009011.2017.1357413

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

Published online: 23 Aug 2017.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

Submit your article to this journal

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

Article views: 1790

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

View related articles

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

View Crossmark data

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

CrossMark
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

# Prospective memory evaluation in aging: new tools and methods

Prospective memory (PM) is generally defined as ‘memory for actions to perform at a defined time in the future’, but recent publications have discussed this definition to specify it further [1]. PM is the most common cognitive complaint after 50 years of age, and everybody says to themselves once in a while, ‘I have something to do, but cannot remember what it is’ or ‘I should have done that before, why did I not remember at the appropriate moment?’

Twenty-seven years since the original paper by Einstein and McDaniel [2] on specific research in this area, there is still growing interest in PM (eight publications in 1994, 17 in 2004 and 103 in 2016, according to PubMed). The fields of experimental and clinical psychology, neuropsychology, medicine, neuroscience and education have developed different methods to explore and understand PM throughout life, in both healthy participants and patients. Beyond the classical debates concerning the PM age paradox [3] and the dissociation between prospective and retrospective components [4], this special issue highlights new methods to evaluate PM.

The first paper, by Blondelle et al. [5], is very informative on the role of regularity on PM throughout life. Moreover, this paper emphasizes the need to conduct an integrative and complete cognitive assessment, and not just to assess PM by itself.

The second paper, by Lecouvey et al. [6], uses a novel virtual reality method to assess PM within a virtual city. As well as allowing precise evaluation, the paradigm has a high level of ecological validity.

Future paradigms need to assess the role of binding, pointed out in both studies. Beyond the laboratory evaluations and scientific purposes, clinicians

and researchers could develop new rehabilitation methods, including binding support to improve PM performance in everyday life.

## References

[1] Lecouvey G, Gonneaud J, Eustache F, et al. Les grandes théories de la mémoire prospective: vers une vision dynamique des processus cognitifs engagés lors du rappel programmé d'intentions. Revue de Neuropsychologie. 2015;7(3):207-216.

[2] Einstein GO, McDaniel MA. Normal aging and prospective memory. J Exp Psychol. 1990;16 (4):717-726.

[3] Bailey PE, Henry JD, Rendell PG, et al. Dismantling the “age-prospective memory paradox”: the classic laboratory paradigm simulated in a naturalistic setting. Q J Exp Psychol. 2010;63(4):646-652.

[4] Hainselin M, Quinette P, Desgranges B, et al. Can we remember future actions yet forget the last two minutes? Study in transient global amnesia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23(12):4138-4149.

[5] Blondelle G, Hainselin M, Gounden Y, et al. Regularity effect in prospective memory during aging. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2016;6(1):31238.

[6] Lecouvey G, Gonneaud J, Piolino P, et al. Is binding decline the main source of the ageing effect on prospective memory? A ride in a virtual town. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2017;7(1):1304610.

Mathieu Hainselin

Centre de Recherche en Psychologie: Cognition, Psychisme et Organisations (CRP-CPO), EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV), Amiens, France

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

Mathieu.hainselin@u-picardie.fr

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-966X

Received 7 July 2017; accepted 17 July 2017