Dabouis, Quentin. 2020. Secondary stress in contemporary British English: An overview. *Anglophonia* (30). doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.3476.

Dabouis, Quentin. 2024. Phonological evidence for morphological complexity in English proper names. *Anglo-phonia* (36). https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/5390.

Dabouis, Quentin & Jean-Michel Fournier. Submitted. An empirical study of vowel reduction and preservation in British English.

Dabouis, Quentin & Jean-Michel Fournier. 2023. The stress patterns of English verbs: Syllable weight or morphology? In Nicolas Ballier, Jean-Michel Fournier, Anne Przewozny & Eiji Yamada (eds.), *New perspectives on English word stress*, 154–191. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Dahak, Anissa. 2011. *Etude diachronique, phonologique et morphologique des syllabes inaccenueées en anglais contemporain*. Paris: Université de Paris Diderot dissertation.

Davis, Stuart & Mi-Hui Cho. 2003. The distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English and Korean: An alignment approach with typological implications. *Linguistics* 41(4). 607–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.020.

Dawson, Nicola, Kathleen Rastle & Jessie Ricketts. 2018. Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition* 44(4). 645–654. doi:10.1037/xlm0000485.

Diependaele, Kevin, Dominiek Sandra & Jonathan Grainger. 2009. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. *Memory & Cognition* 6(37). 895–908. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.895.

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. *Language* 67(3). 547–619. doi: 10.2307/415037.

Emmorey, Karen D. 1989. Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 4(2). 73–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406358.

Fejzo, Anila, Alain Desrochers & S. Hélène Deacon. 2018. The acquisition of derivational morphology in children. In Rachel Berthiaume, Daniel Daigle & Alain Desrochers (eds.), *Morphological processing and literacy development*, 112–132. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315229140-5.

Feldman, Laurie Beth, Patrick A O'Connor & Fermín M Del Prado Martín. 2009. Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. *Psychonomic Bulletin & Review* 16(4). 684–691. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.684.

Fidelholtz, J. 1975. Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. *Chicago Linguistic Society* 11. 200–213.

Forster, Kenneth I. & Tamiko Azuma. 2000. Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? *Language and Cognitive Processes* 15(4–5). 539–561. doi:10.1080/01690960050119698.

Fournier, Jean-Michel. 1996. La reconnaissance morphologique. *Sème Colloque d'Avril sur l'anglais oral*, 45–75. Villetaneuse: Université de Paris-Nord, CELDA, diffusion APLV.

Fudge, Erik. 1984. *English word stress*. London: G. Allen & Unwin.

Gaffiot, Félix. 1934. *Dictionnaire illustré Latin-Français*. Paris: Hachette.

Goldwater, Sharon & Mark Johnson. 2003. Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. In Jennifer Spenader, Anders Eriksson & Östen Dahl (eds.), *Proceedings of the Stockholm workshop on variation within optimality theory*, 111–120. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

Guierre, Lionel. 1979. *Essai sur l'accentuation en anglais contemporain : Eléments pour une synthèse*. Paris: Université Paris-VII dissertation.

Guerre, Lionel. 1990. Mots composés anglais et agrégats consonantiques. *Sème Colloque d'Avril sur l'anglais oral*, 59–72. Villetaneuse: Université de Paris-Nord, CELDA, diffusion APLV.

Halle, Morris & Michael Kenstowicz. 1991. The free element condition and cyclic versus noncyclic stress. *Linguistic Inquiry* 22(3). 457–501.

Halle, Morris & Samuel Keyser. 1971. *English stress: Its form, its growth, and its role in verse*. New York: Harper & Row.

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. *An essay on stress*. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Hammond, Michael. 1989. Cyclic secondary stresses in English. *Proceedings of the annual meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics*, vol. 8, 139–153. Stanford, California: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.

Hammond, Michael. 1999. *The phonology of English: A prosodic optimality-theoretic approach*. (Ed.) Jacques Durand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hammond, Michael. 2003. Frequency, cyclicity, and optimality. University of Arizona. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~hammond/kslides.pdf (accessed 2 September, 2014).
Harley, Heidi. 2009. A morphosyntactic account of the “Latinate” ban on dative shift in English. Paper presented at the colloquium of the Linguistics Department at the University of California, Santa Cruz (15 May).

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. *Theoretical Linguistics* 40(3/4). 225–276. doi:10.1515/tl-2014-0010.

Hayes, Bruce. 1982. Extrametricality and English stress. *Linguistic Inquiry* 13(2). 227–276.

Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova. 2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming ... eventually. *The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology* 71(5). 1112–1124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310915.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. *Language* 51(3). 639–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/412891.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. *The architecture of the language faculty*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. *Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, John T. 2000. Against ambisyllabicity. *Phonology* 17(2). 187–235. doi:10.1017/S0952675700003912.

Katamba, Francis & John T Stonham. 2006. *Morphology. Modern linguistics series*. 2nd ed. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. *Linguistic Inquiry* 10(3). 421–441.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Harry Van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), *The structure of phonological representations I*, 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112328088-008.

Ktori, Maria, Petroula Mousikou & Kathleen Rastle. 2018. Cues to stress assignment in reading Aloud. *Journal of Experimental Psychology* 147(1). 36–61. doi:10.1037/xge0000380.

Ktori, Maria, Jeremy J. Tree, Petroula Mousikou, Max Coltheart & Kathleen Rastle. 2016. Prefixes repel stress in reading aloud: Evidence from surface dyslexia. *Cortex* 74 (October 2015). 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.cor- tex.2015.10.009.

Laudanna, Alessandro, Cristina Burani & Antonella Cermele. 1994. Prefixes as processing units. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 9(3). 295–316. doi:10.1080/01690969408402121.

Levelt, Willem J M, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences* 22(01). 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776.

Liberman, Mark & Alan Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. *Linguistic Inquiry* 8(2). 249–336.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. *Morphology and Lexical Semantics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marelli, Marco, Daniela Traficante & Cristina Burani. 2020. Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. In Vito Pirelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), *Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon*. 553–592. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110440577-014.

Marslen-Wilson, William D., Mirjana Bozic & Billi Randall. 2008. Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 23(3). 394–421.

Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. *Psychological Review* 101(1). 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.101.1.3.

Mascaró, Joan. 2016. Morphological exceptions to vowel reduction in central catalan and the problem of the missing base. *Catalan Journal of Linguistics* 15. 27–51. doi:10.5565/rev.catjl.184.

McKinnon, Richard, Mark Allen & Lee Osterhout. 2003. Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence. *NeuroReport* 14(6). 883–886. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200305060- 00022.

Melinger, Alissa. 2001. *Morphological complexity in English prefixed words: an experimental investigation*. Methodology. Buffalo, NY: University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.

Minkova, Donka & Z.L. Zhou. 2022. Early metrical and lexicographical evidence for functional stress-shifts. *English Language & Linguistics*. Cambridge University Press 26(3). 533–558. doi:10.1017/S1360674322000144.

Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2016. *The representation of probabilistic phonological patterns : neurological, behavioral, and computational evidence from the English stress system*. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

Mousikou, Petroula, Jasmin Sadat, Rebecca Lucas & Kathleen Rastle. 2017. Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading. *Journal of Memory and Language*. Academic Press 93. 169–192. doi:10.1016/J.JML.2016.09.003.
Harley, Heidi. 2009. A morphosyntactic account of the “Latinate” ban on dative shift in English. Paper presented at the colloquium of the Linguistics Department at the University of California, Santa Cruz (15 May).

Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. *Theoretical Linguistics* 40(3/4). 225–276. doi:10.1515/tl-2014-0010.

Hayes, Bruce. 1982. Extrametricality and English stress. *Linguistic Inquiry* 13(2). 227–276.

Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova. 2018. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming ... eventually. *The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology* 71(5). 1112–1124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310915.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. *Language* 51(3). 639–671. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/412891.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. *The architecture of the language faculty*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. *Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, John T. 2000. Against ambisyllabicity. *Phonology* 17(2). 187–235. doi:10.1017/S0952675700003912.

Katamba, Francis & John T Stonham. 2006. *Morphology. Modern linguistics series*. 2nd ed. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. *Linguistic Inquiry* 10(3). 421–441.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Harry Van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), *The structure of phonological representations I*, 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112328088-008.

Ktori, Maria, Petroula Mousikou & Kathleen Rastle. 2018. Cues to stress assignment in reading Aloud. *Journal of Experimental Psychology* 147(1). 36–61. doi:10.1037/xge0000380.

Ktori, Maria, Jeremy J. Tree, Petroula Mousikou, Max Coltheart & Kathleen Rastle. 2016. Prefixes repel stress in reading aloud: Evidence from surface dyslexia. *Cortex* 74 (October 2015). 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.cor- tex.2015.10.009.

Laudanna, Alessandro, Cristina Burani & Antonella Cermele. 1994. Prefixes as processing units. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 9(3). 295–316. doi:10.1080/01690969408402121.

Levelt, Willem J M, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences* 22(01). 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776.

Liberman, Mark & Alan Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. *Linguistic Inquiry* 8(2). 249–336.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. *Morphology and Lexical Semantics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marelli, Marco, Daniela Traficante & Cristina Burani. 2020. Reading morphologically complex words: Experimental evidence and learning models. In Vito Pirelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), *Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon*. 553–592. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110440577-014.

Marslen-Wilson, William D., Mirjana Bozic & Billi Randall. 2008. Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 23(3). 394–421.

Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. *Psychological Review* 101(1). 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.101.1.3.

Mascaró, Joan. 2016. Morphological exceptions to vowel reduction in central catalan and the problem of the missing base. *Catalan Journal of Linguistics* 15. 27–51. doi:10.5565/rev.catjl.184.

McKinnon, Richard, Mark Allen & Lee Osterhout. 2003. Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence. *NeuroReport* 14(6). 883–886. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200305060- 00022.

Melinger, Alissa. 2001. *Morphological complexity in English prefixed words: an experimental investigation*. Methodology. Buffalo, NY: University of New York at Buffalo dissertation.

Minkova, Donka & Z.L. Zhou. 2022. Early metrical and lexicographical evidence for functional stress-shifts. *English Language & Linguistics*. Cambridge University Press 26(3). 533–558. doi:10.1017/S1360674322000144.

Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2016. *The representation of probabilistic phonological patterns : neurological, behavioral, and computational evidence from the English stress system*. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

Mousikou, Petroula, Jasmin Sadat, Rebecca Lucas & Kathleen Rastle. 2017. Moving beyond the monosyllable in models of skilled reading: Mega-study of disyllabic nonword reading. *Journal of Memory and Language*. Academic Press 93. 169–192. doi:10.1016/J.JML.2016.09.003.
Mudgan, Joachim. 2015. Units of word-formation. In P.O. Müller, I. Ohneiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds.), *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Volume 3*, 235–301. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

Nessly, Larry. 1982. Vowel tenseness in English: Another look. *Language Learning* 32(2). 393–410.

Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Laurie B. Feldman. 2004. Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. *Brain and Language* 90(1–3). 31–39. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00417-6.

Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. *Phonology* 17(2). 237–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700003900.

Pater, Joe. 2009a. Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. *Advances in Optimality Theory: Phonological Argumentation. Essays on Evidence and Motivation*, 123–154. London: Equinox. doi:https://doi.org/10.7282/T3FX77CX.

Pater, Joe. 2009b. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. *Cognitive Science* 33(6). 999–1035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01047.x.

Plag, Ingo. 2003. *Word-formation in English*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Poldauf, Ivan. 1984. *English word stress*. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. *Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar*. New Brunswick: Bolder: Rutgers University.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1993. Relating words: A model of base recognition. Part I. *Linguistic Analysis* (23). 3–161.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2004. Absolute ill-formedness and other morphophonological effects. *Phonology* 21(1). 91–142. doi:10.1017/S0952675704000144.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2007. Morphological word structure in English and Swedish: The evidence from prosody. *Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting*, 209–268.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2015. Phonological restrictions on English word-formation. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), *Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe*, 894–917. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rastle, Kathleen. 2019. The place of morphology in learning to read in English. *Cortex* 116. 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.

Rastle, Kathleen & Max Coltheart. 2000. Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. *Journal of Memory and Language* 42. 342–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2687.

Rastle, Kathleen & Matthew H Davis. 2008. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 23(7–8). 942–971.

Ravid, Dorit, Emmanuel Keuleers & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2020. Emergence and early development of lexicon and morphology. In Vito Pirelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), *Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon*, 593–633. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110440577-015.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. *Linguistic Inquiry* 11(3). 563–605.

Siegel, Dorothy C. 1974. *Topics in English Morphology*. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

Siegel, Dorothy C. 1980. Why there is no = boundary. In Mark Aronoff & Mary-Louise Kean (eds.), *Juncture: A Collection of Original Papers*, 131–134. Saratoga: Anma Libri.

Sonderegger, Morgan & Partha Niyogi. 2013. Variation and change in English noun/verb pair stress: Data and dynamical systems models. In A.C.L. Yu (ed.), *Origins of Sound Change*, 262–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0013.

Stanners, Robert F., James J. Neiser & Scott Painton. 1979. Memory representation for prefixed words. *Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior* 18(6). 733–743. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90439-0.

Taft, Marcus. 1979. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. *Memory & Cognition* 7(4). 263–272. doi:10.3758/BF03197599.

Taft, Marcus. 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 9(3). 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120.

Taft, Marcus. 2003. Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In Egbert M. H. Assink & Dominiek Sandra (eds.), *Reading complex words*, 113–137. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_6.

Taft, Marcus & Kenneth I. Forster. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. *Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior* 14(6). 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.

Taft, Marcus, Gail Hambly & Sachiko Kinoshita. 1986. Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. *The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology* (38A). 351–366.
Mudgan, Joachim. 2015. Units of word-formation. In P.O. Müller, I. Ohneiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds.), *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Volume 3*, 235–301. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

Nessly, Larry. 1982. Vowel tenseness in English: Another look. *Language Learning* 32(2). 393–410.

Pastizzo, Matthew J. & Laurie B. Feldman. 2004. Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. *Brain and Language* 90(1–3). 31–39. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00417-6.

Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. *Phonology* 17(2). 237–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700003900.

Pater, Joe. 2009a. Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. *Advances in Optimality Theory: Phonological Argumentation. Essays on Evidence and Motivation*, 123–154. London: Equinox. doi:https://doi.org/10.7282/T3FX77CX.

Pater, Joe. 2009b. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. *Cognitive Science* 33(6). 999–1035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01047.x.

Plag, Ingo. 2003. *Word-formation in English*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Poldauf, Ivan. 1984. *English word stress*. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. *Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar*. New Brunswick: Bolder: Rutgers University.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1993. Relating words: A model of base recognition. Part I. *Linguistic Analysis* (23). 3–161.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2004. Absolute ill-formedness and other morphophonological effects. *Phonology* 21(1). 91–142. doi:10.1017/S0952675704000144.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2007. Morphological word structure in English and Swedish: The evidence from prosody. *Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting*, 209–268.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2015. Phonological restrictions on English word-formation. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), *Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe*, 894–917. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rastle, Kathleen. 2019. The place of morphology in learning to read in English. *Cortex* 116. 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.

Rastle, Kathleen & Max Coltheart. 2000. Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. *Journal of Memory and Language* 42. 342–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2687.

Rastle, Kathleen & Matthew H Davis. 2008. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 23(7–8). 942–971.

Ravid, Dorit, Emmanuel Keuleers & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2020. Emergence and early development of lexicon and morphology. In Vito Pirelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), *Word knowledge and word usage: A cross-disciplinary guide to the mental lexicon*, 593–633. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110440577-015.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1980. The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. *Linguistic Inquiry* 11(3). 563–605.

Siegel, Dorothy C. 1974. *Topics in English Morphology*. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

Siegel, Dorothy C. 1980. Why there is no = boundary. In Mark Aronoff & Mary-Louise Kean (eds.), *Juncture: A Collection of Original Papers*, 131–134. Saratoga: Anma Libri.

Sonderegger, Morgan & Partha Niyogi. 2013. Variation and change in English noun/verb pair stress: Data and dynamical systems models. In A.C.L. Yu (ed.), *Origins of Sound Change*, 262–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0013.

Stanners, Robert F., James J. Neiser & Scott Painton. 1979. Memory representation for prefixed words. *Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior* 18(6). 733–743. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90439-0.

Taft, Marcus. 1979. Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. *Memory & Cognition* 7(4). 263–272. doi:10.3758/BF03197599.

Taft, Marcus. 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. *Language and Cognitive Processes* 9(3). 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120.

Taft, Marcus. 2003. Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In Egbert M. H. Assink & Dominiek Sandra (eds.), *Reading complex words*, 113–137. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3720-2_6.

Taft, Marcus & Kenneth I. Forster. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. *Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior* 14(6). 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.

Taft, Marcus, Gail Hambly & Sachiko Kinoshita. 1986. Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. *The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology* (38A). 351–366.
Taft, Marcus & Paul Kougious. 2004. The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. *Brain and Language* 90(1–3). 9–16. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00415-2.

Treiman, Rebecca, Nicole Rosales, Lauren Cusner & Brett Kessler. 2020. Cues to stress in English spelling. *Journal of Memory and Language* 112. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104089.

Tyler, Andrea & William Nagy. 1989. The acquisition of English derivational morphology. *Journal of Memory and Language* 28(6). 649–667. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8.

Wells, John C. 2008. *Longman Pronunciation Dictionary*. 3rd ed. London: Longman.

Widdows, Dominic & Trevor Cohen. 2010. The semantic vectors package: New algorithms and public tools for distributional semantics. *Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 4th International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC* 2010. 9–15. doi:10.1109/ICSC.2010.94.

Wurm, Lee H. 1997. Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. *Journal of Memory and Language* 37(3). 438–461. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2524.

Wurm, Lee H. 2000. Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. *Journal of Memory and Language* 42. 255–271. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2678. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2678.

Zuraw, Kie. 2010. A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. *Natural Language & Linguistic Theory* 28(2). 417–472. doi:10.1007/s11049-010-9095-z.

<footnote>**Cite this article:** Dabouis, Quentin and Fournier, Jean-Michel. 2024. “Opaque morphology and phonology: Historical prefixes in English.” *Journal of Linguistics*. doi:10.1017/S00222672400015X</footnote>
Taft, Marcus & Paul Kougious. 2004. The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. *Brain and Language* 90(1–3). 9–16. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00415-2.

Treiman, Rebecca, Nicole Rosales, Lauren Cusner & Brett Kessler. 2020. Cues to stress in English spelling. *Journal of Memory and Language* 112. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104089.

Tyler, Andrea & William Nagy. 1989. The acquisition of English derivational morphology. *Journal of Memory and Language* 28(6). 649–667. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8.

Wells, John C. 2008. *Longman Pronunciation Dictionary*. 3rd ed. London: Longman.

Widdows, Dominic & Trevor Cohen. 2010. The semantic vectors package: New algorithms and public tools for distributional semantics. *Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 4th International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC* 2010. 9–15. doi:10.1109/ICSC.2010.94.

Wurm, Lee H. 1997. Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. *Journal of Memory and Language* 37(3). 438–461. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2524.

Wurm, Lee H. 2000. Auditory processing of polymorphemic pseudowords. *Journal of Memory and Language* 42. 255–271. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2678. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2678.

Zuraw, Kie. 2010. A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. *Natural Language & Linguistic Theory* 28(2). 417–472. doi:10.1007/s11049-010-9095-z.

<footnote>**Cite this article:** Dabouis, Quentin and Fournier, Jean-Michel. 2024. “Opaque morphology and phonology: Historical prefixes in English.” *Journal of Linguistics*. doi:10.1017/S00222672400015X</footnote>