# Should I stay, or should I go: Anthropogenic noises disrupt early recruitment of subarctic invertebrates

Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Thomas Uboldi, Frédéric Olivier, Réjean Tremblay, Laurent Chauvaud, Delphine Mathias, Pascal Lazure, Antoine Frémont, Tarik Meziane, Sylvain Chauvaud, et al.

► To cite this version:

Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Thomas Uboldi, Frédéric Olivier, Réjean Tremblay, Laurent Chauvaud, et al. "Should I stay, or should I go: Anthropogenic noises disrupt early recruitment of subarctic invertebrates." Ecological Applications, 2025, 35 (7), pp.e70119. 10.1002/eap.70119. hal-05426741

HAL Id: hal-05426741

https://hal.science/hal-05426741v1

Submitted on 10 Feb 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
# Should I stay, or should I go: Anthropogenic noises disrupt early recruitment of subarctic invertebrates

Nathália Byrro Gauthier<fnref n="1" /> ID | Thomas Uboldi<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> ID | Frédéric Olivier<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="4" /> ID |

Réjean Tremblay<fnref n="1" /> ID | Laurent Chauvaud<fnref n="2" /> ID | Delphine Mathias<fnref n="5" /> ID |

Pascal Lazure<fnref n="6" /> ID | Antoine Frémont<fnref n="7" /> | Tarik Meziane<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="8" /> ID |

Sylvain Chauvaud<fnref n="5" />,<fnref n="9" /> | Gesche Winkler<fnref n="1" /> ID

**Correspondence**

Nathália Byrro Gauthier
Email: nathalia.byrrogauthier@uqar.ca

**Funding information**

French National Research Agency (ANR), Grant/Award Number: ANR-19-FQSM-0005; Ressources Aquatiques Québec Research Network, Grant/Award Number: 2020-RS4-265329; Fonds de Recherche du Québec (FRQ), Grant/Award Number: FRQNT 280057; Mitacs, Grant/Award Number: IT-23610; ISMER-UQAR; NSERC Discovery Grant

Handling Editor: P. Edward Parnell

**Abstract**

Coastal subarctic systems are inhabited by bivalve and gastropods, which due to their lifecycle and longevity are reliable indicators of ecological alterations in the environment. Recent laboratory studies have shown that young life stages of invertebrates perceive natural sounds, and their settlement, behavior, and fitness could be altered by anthropogenic noise. Through a field study conducted on two sites differing by their noise pollution level (pristine [PS] or anthropized [AS]), we tested whether the distances (from 25 to 890 m) of anthropogenic noises might affect the diversity and early recruitment of multiple species in pristine and anthropized sites using artificial collectors moored on transects. Overall, environmental conditions (except sound levels) were homogeneous through the transects. The acoustic scenario differed between the PS (vessel noise, 132–138 dB re 1 µPa<fnref n="2" /> s) and AS (mix of pile driving and vessel noise, >140 dB re 1 µPa<fnref n="2" /> s) sites, with the AS site experiencing a higher level of sound exposure than the PS site. Species richness fluctuated with distance from the noise, but only in the anthropized site. Regarding species

<footnote n="1">¹Institut des Sciences de la Mer (ISMER), Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Rimouski, Québec, Canada</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (UMR 6539 LEMAR), UBO, CNRS, IRD, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (UAR 3113 IUEM), Plouzané, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Laboratoire de 'Biologie des Organismes et Écosystèmes Aquatiques' (UMR 8067 BOREA), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Sorbonne Université (SU), Université des Antilles (UA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD 207), Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴Université de Bretagne Occidentale (UBO), CNRS, IRD, IUEM, Plouzané, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Société d'Observation Multimodale de l'Environnement (SOMME), Brest, France</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (UMR 6523 LOPS), UBO, IRD, IFREMER, CNRS, IUEM, Plouzané, France</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire pour la Sociologie Économique (UMR 3320 LISE), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM), CNRS, Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="8">⁸SAFIR, Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates</footnote>

<footnote n="9">⁹Télédétection en Biologie Marine et Environnement (TBM Environnement), Auray, France</footnote>

<footnote>This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</footnote>

<footnote>© 2025 The Author(s). *Ecological Applications* published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</footnote>
diversity and evenness, they varied with distance and month at both sites, displaying a clear negative effect of anthropogenic noises and shifting species composition. Specific early recruitment responses were observed for each species to anthropogenic noise, but with a different pattern for each site due to variations in sound pressure and exposure levels. The findings of our field study document, for the first time, that controlled anthropogenic noise emission leads to ecological shifts in community structure and population metrics of benthopelagic marine invertebrate species. To avoid disruptions in community structure and recruitment, we recommend that a noise threshold level for invertebrates should be below 140 dB re 1 µPa² s.

### KEYWORDS

anthropophony, bivalves, gastropods, marine noise pollution, noise effects, population dynamics

## INTRODUCTION

Subarctic ecosystems are dynamic and fragile environments, characterized by a remarkable diversity of marine organisms, including the ubiquitous marine invertebrates (Dunbar, 1954). These organisms are essential components of coastal ecosystems and serve as reliable indicators of environmental disturbances (Baden et al., 2021; Seed et al., 2000). Over the years, the subarctic region has been increasingly enduring multiple anthropogenic stressors. These include ocean warming and acidification, chemical pollution (see details on Halpern et al., 2019; Svavarsson et al., 2021), and anthropogenic noise—recently recognized as a distinct and pervasive form of pollution (Duarte et al., 2021; Merchant et al., 2022; Slabbekoorn et al., 2010). Collectively, these pressures jeopardize the health and stability of the ecosystem at risk (Halpern et al., 2019). Therefore, monitoring subarctic communities through metrics such as species richness, diversity, and evenness became vital. These ecological indicators offer insights into recruitment patterns, help to predict responses to anthropogenic disturbance, and support the development of sustainable mitigation and management strategies (Austen et al., 2002; Campagne et al., 2023; Dreujou et al., 2020). Among emerging stressors, anthropogenic noise (such as vessel noise, pile driving, drilling, and related activities) has gained increasing attention. Some countries have incorporated such noise into marine directives or are working toward guidelines to address its ecological implications to prevent harmful effects (Breeze et al., 2022; Merchant et al., 2022). The frequency, intensity, and temporal characteristics of anthropogenic noises turn them into pervasive pollutants, capable of generating ecological effects across both terrestrial and marine ecosystems (Jerem & Mathews, 2020; Kunc et al., 2016; Sordello et al., 2020).

Despite growing research into its effects on wildlife, birds and marine mammals remain the most intensively studied groups, with invertebrates and reptiles receiving the least attention (Jerem & Mathews, 2020; Sordello et al., 2020). Noise has been shown to alter bird diversity (Perillo et al., 2017; Proppe et al., 2013) and amphibian species composition (Trowbridge & Litzgus, 2022). However, the ecological effects of anthropogenic noise on marine benthic invertebrates remain understudied, despite emerging evidence that noise promotes behavioral and fitness effects (Gigot et al., 2024; Jolivet et al., 2016; Olivier et al., 2023; Stocks et al., 2012; Veillard et al., 2025; Wilkens et al., 2012).

One particularly sensitive phase in the life cycle of benthic invertebrates, like bivalves and gastropods, is the transition from planktonic larvae to benthic sessile or slow-moving juveniles. These stages are connected by a milestone event filled with exploratory behavior and cue detection, known as settlement (Hadfield & Paul, 2001; Thorson, 1950). Numerous studies have demonstrated that larvae evaluate a range of cues when selecting or rejecting settlement sites, including hydrodynamics (Butman, 1987; Fuchs et al., 2018; Pernet et al., 2003), substrate characteristics (Bayne, 1965; Fraschetti et al., 2003), biofilm composition (Hadfield & Paul, 2001; Toupoint, Mohit, et al., 2012), the presence of conspecifics or predators (Beal et al., 2020; Hadfield & Paul, 2001; Morello & Yund, 2016), trophic signals (Androuin et al., 2022; Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al., 2012), and, more recently, underwater soundscapes (Lillis et al., 2013, 2015; Williams et al., 2022). Some of these acoustic cues are anthropogenic in origin (i.e., maritime traffic, pile driving or drilling operations), and recent research suggests that larvae can perceive and respond to them. Laboratory studies have shown that larvae may respond or not to the combination of trophic cues with anthropogenic noise (Gigot, Olivier, et al., 2023; Gigot, Tremblay, et al., 2023;
Jolivet et al., 2016). If a suitable substrate and environmental conditions are found, larvae settle and metamorphose into a benthic form (Hunt & Scheibling, 1997). However, in the absence of suitable cues, settlement-metamorphosis of species may be delayed. This delay not only provides larvae with another opportunity to locate a suitable settlement site but also increases their vulnerability to environmental stressors (Bayne, 1965; Lagarde et al., 2018; Martel et al., 2014; Pechenik, 1990). Post-metamorphic stages are also vulnerable, but in this case, substantial mortality is often driven by predation (reviewed by Beal et al., 2020; Gosselin & Qian, 1997; O'Connor et al., 2008). In some species, this first attachment is not permanent, and post-metamorphic stages may passively resuspend or actively respond to environmental stimuli (i.e., hydrodynamics, trophic environment, pollution), resulting in secondary migration and new spatial distribution (Forêt et al., 2018; Günther, 1992; Martel & Chia, 1991). Consequently, recruitment is governed not only by larval availability (supply-side theory) but also by larval behavior during settlement, physiological state, and post-settlement survival and migration, all modulated by a complex interplay of biotic and abiotic factors (Hunt & Scheibling, 1997; Keough & Downes, 1982; Leal et al., 2022; Martel & Chia, 1991).

Shipping noise is increasingly recognized as a disruptor of natural soundscapes (Duarte et al., 2021) with potential consequences for population processes and community structure (Kunc et al., 2016; Solé et al., 2023). To progress in this context, field experiments are required, as they offer ecological insights by incorporating seasonal variation, species interactions, and simultaneous environmental stressors (Spicer, 2014). This limitation is compounded by the lack of in situ data on the distances from the source at which noise begins to impair invertebrate functions, making it difficult to define biologically relevant thresholds (Hawkins & Popper, 2017). In contrast, regulatory thresholds for sound pressure and exposure levels have been more thoroughly established for marine mammals, and to a lesser extent, for fish. Similarly, regulatory efforts across other taxa and countries remain uneven compared to marine mammals (see Bonnel et al., 2022; Breeze et al., 2022; Merchant et al., 2022; NFMS, 2018; Popper et al., 2014 for an overview of the topic).

Understanding how vessel noise affects organisms at specific distances from its source is especially important for invertebrate communities and foundation species inhabiting both nearly pristine and more anthropized environments, where differing acoustic soundscapes may lead to distinct impacts (Halliday et al., 2021; NRC, 2003). To address this, we selected experimental sites with contrasting acoustic profiles to assess whether a gradient of vessel noise produces different ecological responses at each site. We deployed artificial collectors at

three distances (D1, D2, and D3) from a commercial vessel noise source along transects at two sites with different levels of maritime traffic: Miquelon (pristine) and Saint-Pierre (anthropized). This setup exposed collectors to a gradient of vessel noise intensities: 137 dB at D1, 120 dB at D2, and 106 dB re 1 µPa at D3. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess the effect of distances from such anthropogenic noise—measured as sound intensity—on the diversity and early recruitment of multiple benthic species in a field setting. We hypothesized that as the distance between the re-emitted vessel noise and collectors decreases, the diversity and early recruitment of subarctic invertebrates would also decline. To test this hypothesis, we first estimated the number of taxa, diversity, and evenness in the collectors, using indices such as species richness (S), Shannon-Wiener (H'), and Pielou's Evenness (J'). We then examined the abundance (potential settlers, post-larvae, juveniles) from different invertebrate taxa on collectors placed at increasing distances from vessel noise sources over 4 months in the field.

# MATERIALS AND METHODS

## Study sites

The study was carried out in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon (SPM), a French archipelago in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, which is surrounded by the Grand Banks, the Gulf of Saint-Lawrence, and the Scotian Shelf (Dubois, 2010; IEDOM, 2022, p. 20, Figure 1). SPM lies at the convergence of the warm Gulf Stream and the cold Labrador Current, creating a subarctic environment with a strong seasonal thermocline. These currents (Labrador and Scotian Shelf) are generally weak during spring, but they intensify during fall and winter. SPM experiences large near-bottom diurnal temperature amplitude, with low and high stratification periods in early July and late August, respectively. Tides are mostly semidiurnal of relatively low range (~1.3 m) (Lazure et al., 2018). The trophic environment is mostly oligotrophic, with spring and occasional microalgal blooms (April, September/October). Seston quality, assessed by fatty acid methods, is influenced by stratification conditions, which might potentially impact nutrient exchange between surface and subsurface waters (Bridier et al., 2021); however, this thermal-trophic variability is lower in shallow waters (<20 m). Additionally, the relatively flat shallow seafloor (Lazure et al., 2018) makes SPM ideal for in situ acoustic playback experiments (Bonnel et al., 2022), as sound propagation in shallow waters depends heavily on depth and physical properties of the seafloor (NRC, 2003). Together, these features make SPM a suitable site to conduct in situ experiments that assess the impact of noise on marine
<figure><img src="image_2.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 1** Set of maps of our study area: (a, b) Location of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon's archipelago, where each site is referred as pristine (PS) or anthropized (AS) due to the level of anthropogenic noise at the islands of Miquelon and Saint-Pierre, respectively. (c, d) Bathymetric maps containing sites, and stations from the sound (D1, D2, and D3) on transects exposed to an anthropogenic noise source (P0) at pristine site (PS) and anthropized site (AS), which had pile driving operations occurring at the same time of sampling. Bathymetry data were retrieved from General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO). Bathymetric maps are composed using grayscale where white represents 0–1 m, 2–30 m light to dark gray, and values >100 m are black. ADCP, acoustic Doppler current profilers.</figcaption></figure>

organisms. To minimize variability in the physical and trophic conditions—to avoid confounding effects from sound propagation—we selected two sites: a pristine site (Miquelon, pristine, PS) with no industrial marine traffic, and an anthropized site (Saint-Pierre, anthropized, AS) near an industrial harbor. For both sites, vessel activity was obtained using the Automatic Identification System (AIS) from MarineTraffic Professional Plus software (www.marinetraffic.com). At the PS site, only a small ferry and a few recreational boats were detected, whereas 103 vessel trajectories were recorded at the AS between May 12 and 29, 2021.

## Vessel noise recordings and soundtrack compilation

Acoustic recordings were collected from the AS site (46°46′44.90″ N, −56°10′38.28″ W) from November 2020

to April 2021 using a calibrated hydrophone (Aural-M2, Multi-Électronique, Rimouski, Canada) moored close to the seabed at the Saint-Pierre harbor. Recordings made at the AS site contain noise from the “Nolhan Ava,” a 120-m commercial ship that provides cargo services to SPM. The spectral composition and source sound level were also determined using the software MATLAB (2021a). From these recordings, a 1-h and 20-min maritime traffic soundtrack was created, alternating between vessel noise (11 min, then 8.5 min) and silent segments (39 min, then 21.5 min), as in Veillard et al. (2025). This vessel noise soundtrack was played and looped during the experimental period from July to October 2021 at each site (PS and AS) using underwater speakers (Lubell Labs VC2C, Columbus, OH, USA), which emitted approximately a root mean square sound pressure level (SPL<sub>rms</sub>) of 167 dB re 1 µPa of vessel noise at 0 m (Table 1).
## Transmission loss calculations and acoustic features of pristine and anthropized sites

Transmission loss calculations using the formula $TL = 20\log R$ (where R is the range in meters) were made to estimate sound intensities received at each distance on each transect (Table 1). Based on the transmission loss calculation, these distances received different levels of SPL<sub>rms</sub> ranging from 106 to 137 dB re 1 µPa in both sites (Table 1). The characterization of ambient noise was conducted for the two sites (Appendix S1: Figure S1). Due to the low levels of anthropogenic activity in the PS site, underwater acoustic recorders (RTSYS-RESEA 320, Caudan, France; Hydrophone Colmar GP1516M, Sensitivity -172 dB re 1 V/µPa @ 5 kHz) were deployed 2 days in August, 2 days in September, and 1 day in October. An AURAL hydrophone was deployed continuously a month before starting the trial (June) and during the entire experimental period (July–October 2021) in the AS site. The sound exposure level per minute (SEL<sub>1min</sub>, total sound energy of one minute event in decibels relative to a reference pressure of one micropascal squared per second) was also calculated, and acoustic metrics were analyzed according to Bonnel et al. (2022). Therefore, we characterized sound levels at each site using SPL<sub>rms</sub> and SEL<sub>1min</sub>.

VC2C, 50 Hz–1.5 kHz) protected by a metal frame were suspended to a depth of 8 m at both sites oriented offshore. Both transects were exposed to a replayed soundtrack of vessel sound. A set of collectors made of 2-mm mesh bags, each filled with four inverted Netron sections (40 × 80 cm with a mesh size of 5 mm, area of 0.320 m²), were moored at three stations from the sound emission: D1 (close, 137 dB re 1 µPa at 25–30 m), D2 (intermediate, 120 dB re 1 µPa at 144–175 m), and D3 (far, 106 dB re 1 µPa at 848–890 m) (Appendix S1: Figure S1). On each mooring, four artificial collectors were installed close to the bottom and were kept in place by subsurface buoys, as detailed in Cyr et al. (2007). A total of 96 collectors were assessed during the experimental period (4 replicates × 3 distances along the transect × 4 months—July, August, September, October × 2 sites—PS and AS). The sanitary restrictions related to COVID-19 downscaled our original design since it was unfeasible to have control transects at each site without having enough personnel to carry out the manipulation. For these reasons, the collectors at station D3 (far distance) in the PS site were considered as control since the sound reaching these collectors had similar levels of ambient sound (SPL<sub>rms</sub> = 106 dB re 1 µPa) than levels documented in the literature (Halliday et al., 2021; Mathias et al., 2016).

## In situ experimental design

This study was carried out from the end of June to mid-October 2021 in SPM. Underwater speakers (Lubell Labs

## Monitoring environmental conditions of an in situ recruitment

Temperature and currents were monitored throughout the entire experimental period at each site. Temperature

<table><caption>TABLE 1 Location and sampling points, distances from the speaker (in meters), point coordinates (degrees, minutes, seconds), depth (in meters), and levels of sound received (decibels relative to a reference pressure of one micropascal) at each distance sampled in the Pristine (PS, Miquelon) and Anthropized (AS, Saint-Pierre) sites.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Sites and sampling distances</th><th rowspan="2">Distance from speaker (m)</th><th rowspan="2">Received level of sound (dB re 1 µPa)</th><th rowspan="2">Depth (m)</th><th colspan="2">Coordinates</th></tr><tr><th>Latitude</th><th>Longitude</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>PS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>P0</td><td>0</td><td>167</td><td></td><td>47°06′08.39″ N</td><td>56°22′28.62″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D1</td><td>25</td><td>137</td><td>8</td><td>47°06′08.22″ N</td><td>56°22′27.59″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D2</td><td>175</td><td>120</td><td>8</td><td>47°06′06.66″ N</td><td>56°22′20.70″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D3</td><td>890</td><td>106</td><td>8</td><td>47°05′59.88″ N</td><td>56°21′48.53″ W</td></tr><tr><td>ADCP</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>47°06′04.38″ N</td><td>56°22′12.54″ W</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6"><strong>AS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>P0</td><td>0</td><td>154</td><td></td><td>46°47′39.00″ N</td><td>56°09′29.58″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D1</td><td>30</td><td>153</td><td>15</td><td>46°47′38.46″ N</td><td>56°09′28.44″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D2</td><td>144</td><td>150</td><td>20</td><td>46°47′41.28″ N</td><td>56°09′23.64″ W</td></tr><tr><td>D3</td><td>848</td><td>143</td><td>20</td><td>46°47′52.73″ N</td><td>56°08′54.96″ W</td></tr><tr><td>ADCP</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>46°47′45.06″ N</td><td>56°09′16.02″ W</td></tr></tbody></table>

Abbreviation: ADCP, acoustic Doppler current profilers.
was measured by probes (HOBO Pendant Temperature/ Light 64 K, contained within waterproof casings), while current velocity was determined using two acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP Teledyne RD Instruments 600 and 1200 kHz models, refer to Table 1 for position on the transect at each site). To monitor the distribution pattern of total particulate matter (TPM, hereafter referred to as seston), seawater samples (n = 2, 5 L each) were collected monthly at each distance (D1-D3) of both transects at each site at the mooring depths using Niskin bottles and stored in opaque vials. Two bottles per sampling were used as replicates for determining seston quantity (TPM, in milligrams per liter of dry weight) and quality as mass of total fatty acids (MTFA, fatty acid composition). After being collected, samples were filtered on pre-weighed and pre-combusted 47 mm GF/F filters and stored at -40°C for a maximum of 4 months, then transferred to -80°C until further analysis as described in Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al. (2012). Additionally, at each sampling event, another 3 × 4.5 mL of pre-filtered seawater (over a 40-µm mesh) were fixed with 20 µL glutaraldehyde (0.1% final v/v) and kept at -40°C for determination of bacteria, pico- and nanoplankton using flow cytometry. Samples were stored at -40°C for up to 4 months, then transferred to -80°C until analyses.

## Response to anthropogenic noise: Community dynamics and early recruitment

During this experiment, the first collectors were moored at the end of June and retrieved by divers at the end of July 2021 and transported to the shore in individual bags to avoid spat losses. To retrieve all organisms inside, each collector (replicate) was placed in a 100-µm plankton net and cleaned using a low-pressure seawater jet. The material accumulated in the net cup was filtered on a 100-µm mesh and transferred to labeled Ziplock bags and stored at -40°C for further analysis. In the laboratory, all species were sorted, counted, and identified to family, genus, or species level, when possible, under a stereomicroscope. The identification of species and families was made using the following taxonomic keys: Aucoin et al. (2004), Hayward and Ryland (2017), and Lutz et al. (2018).

## Laboratory procedures

### Characterization of trophic environment: Fatty acid extraction and trophic markers

Several sources of organic matter contribute to feeding benthic species (diatoms, dinoflagellates, bacteria, macroalgae).

Fatty acids (FA) are useful trophic markers to monitor the seston quality being delivered to recruits in the benthic realm (Bridier et al., 2021; Kelly & Scheibling, 2012; Meziane et al., 2007). Given the role of seston, particularly its quality of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and essential fatty acids (EFA), in mussel settlement (Martel et al., 2014; Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al., 2012), we analyzed the FA profile of seston samples collected at the two study sites. To process seston filters collected over the sampling period, we adopted biochemical techniques such as FA extraction and quantification. Detailed information on the methodology for extracting FA, FA composition, and trophic markers is available in Appendix S1: Section S1.

## Flow cytometry analyses to determine food sources

Various food sources (e.g., picoplankton, nanoplankton, bacterial concentration) have been identified as media-tors of bivalve settlement and early recruitment (Androuin et al., 2022; Lagarde et al., 2018; Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al., 2012; Veillard et al., 2023). In conditions where planktonic sources are limited, biofilm cues (its composition) may play an important role in trigger-gering settlement (Toupoint, Mohit, et al., 2012). To char-acterize the concentration of food sources available at our study sites, seston samples were analyzed using an Epics Altra flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Ful-lerton, CA, USA). Fluorescently labeled cells were identi-fied and quantified into different categories, including pico- (0.2–2 µm) and nano- (2–20 µm) eukaryotes, cyanobacteria, as well as heterotrophic bacteria, follow-ing the methods outlined by Belzile et al. (2008) and Tremblay et al. (2009), as detailed in Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al. (2012).

## Identification and abundance of benthic invertebrates

Samples were sieved over decreasing mesh sizes (1.7 mm, 500 and 150 µm) using seawater to distinguish primary settlers (>150 µm), from secondary settlers (>500 µm) and from larger juveniles (>1.7 mm). Fractions were sorted in a basin (>1.7 mm) and in a Dollfus counting chamber (>500 and >150 µm) under a Leica microscope (M125, Germany). Due to the high abundance of individ-uals, only a quarter of the samples from September and October were analyzed, and splits were prepared by using a Folsom splitter. Sub-sampling adjustments were made for high abundance species such as *Hiatella arctica* and *Mytilidae* (25 squares spread out in eight square
intervals). For low abundance species, individuals were counted in all 200 squares in the chamber. Even though individuals from *Mytilus* spp. and *Modiolus* spp. were identified to species level in larger fractions, the smallest fraction (>150 µm) was considered as Mytilidae. Since only a few taxa could not be identified to the species or family level, they were named after the group followed by a species number (i.e., Bivalve sp.1, Gastropod sp.1).

## Community and species selection

The community composition was described using percentages of abundance. The community diversity was evaluated using different indices such as species number (Richness, S), the diversity (Shannon–Wiener Index, H'), and equitability (Pielou's evenness index, J') of assemblages retrieved at different distances at the PS and AS sites. These indices were estimated without *H. arctica* because this species was overwhelmingly dominant in our collectors at both sites. To compare the effect of sound level exposure on species recruits, we chose five taxa based on the following conditions: (1) species or family that have been used as suitable environmental indicators for decades such as *H. arctica*, Mytilidae species, and *Placopecten magellanicus* (Cyr et al., 2007; Forêt et al., 2018; Garcia et al., 2003; Veillard et al., 2023); (2) foundation species such as *Modiolus* sp. and *Mytilus* spp. (= Mytilidae) (Baden et al., 2021; Seed et al., 2000); (3) important commercial and ecological bivalve and gastropod species such as *P. magellanicus* (Aucoin et al., 2004; Cyr et al., 2007; Tremblay et al., 2020) and *Lacuna* spp. (Martel & Chia, 1991; Martel & Diefenbach, 1993); and (4) taxa such as *Skenea* sp. that were present (>40 individuals month⁻¹) at both sites.

## Data analysis

At the PS site, due to data loss, temperature differences were only assessed between D1 and D2 using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. At the AS site, variations in temperature were assessed between stations (D1, D2, D3). Data were transformed using the square root function, and residuals were tested for normality and homogeneity with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests before conducting one-way ANOVA.

Achieving a normal distribution of biological and trophic data is challenging when there is a wide variation in replicates and missing data at some sampling points (Anderson, 2001). Because of this, permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) was used with PRIMER-E 7.0 (9999 permutations) to detect differences

in trophic and biological data among distances at each site. Seston quantity (TPM) and quality (MTFA, fatty acid composition, and trophic markers, *n* = 6 or 8 depending on site) as well as food sources (heterotrophic bacteria, pico- and nanocyanobacteria, and pico- and nanoeukaryotes, *n* = 3 or 4 depending on site) were compared between stations at each site (3 levels—D1, D2, and D3) using one-way PERMANOVA. TPM and MTFA matrices were individually constructed using the Euclidean distance, while food source data were ranked, due to different concentration levels, and then converted together into an Euclidean distance matrix. A Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix was calculated based on trophic marker data comprising bacteria (Σai15:0, iso15:0, 18:1ω7), degraded organic matter (Σ14:0, 16:0, 18:0), diatoms (Σ16:1ω7, 20:5ω3), dinoflagellates (Σ22:6ω3), green (Σ18:2ω6, 18:3ω6), and brown macroalgae (Σ18:1ω9). Significant PERMANOVA results (*p* < 0.05) were followed by pairwise tests, and similarity percentage (SIMPER) analyses were conducted on untransformed data to identify similarities in all metrics within each distance from the underwater speaker (D1, D2, and D3). We estimated species abundances (in number of individuals per collector) from our biological data and then expressed each species/taxa in a Bray–Curtis similarity matrix. Diversity indices were calculated from this biological dataset using the function DIVERSE on PRIMER 7.0, and each calculated index was converted into an Euclidean distance matrix. These distance matrices were analyzed each using a two-factor PERMANOVA to examine the effect of distance from the noise (Di, 3 levels—D1, D2, and D3), month (Mo, 4 levels—July, August, September, and October), and their interaction (Di × Mo) on the early recruitment, species richness, diversity, and evenness at each site. If results were significant (*p* < 0.05), pairwise comparisons were performed coupled to a Monte Carlo simulation test to validate the probability of our results when a limited number of permutations were executed. We also conducted SIMPER analyses to identify the species that most contributed (in percentage) to similarities between collector assemblages at each distance and month. All statistical tests used a 0.05 significance level, performed with PRIMER 7.0 and GraphPad Prism 10.5. Plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 10.5 and MATLAB2021a.

# RESULTS

## Physical environment

Temperatures (mean ± SD) in PS were uniform across distances (13.1 ± 0.5°C, *U* = 6934, *p* = 0.93), with seasonal fluctuations ranging from 8.5 to 17.0°C (Figure 2a). A 5°C drop and a 3°C rise in mid- and late September
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 2 Temperature (in degrees Celsius) and current profiles (velocity, in meters per second) on each transect at pristine (PS, a, c) and anthropized (AS, b, d) sites during the sampling period from July to October 2021.</figcaption></figure>

(Figure 2a), likely due to Hurricane Larry (Brown, 2021), resulted from a vertical mixing of the water column and heat loss from strong winds. In October, temperatures dropped from 15 to 11.5°C. At the AS site, temperatures were comparable along the transect ($12.1 \pm 1.5$°C, ANOVA, df = 3, $F = 0.41, p = 0.74$), fluctuating seasonally between 5.5 (early July) and 16–17°C (mid-August). Greater semidiurnal and diurnal oscillations (7–10°C) from mid-August to mid-September (Figure 2b) were driven by internal waves caused by barotropic tides, facilitated by stronger stratification at AS. The barotropic tide generates internal waves that cause the cold-water masses on the bottom to oscillate in the cross-shore direction at the tidal frequency

(Lazure et al., 2018). These oscillations weakened after the September 11 storm due to increased vertical mixing. The seasonal temperature gradient in the PS site (2–4°C) was over two times lower than in the AS site (7–10°C), possibly due to an intense effect of internal waves in the AS site (Lazure et al., 2018).

Currents at PS ranged from 0 to $0.4 \text{ m s}^{-1}$, with greater variability at the beginning of October (Figure 2c). Bottom and surface currents were weak and predominantly north–south and north-west, respectively. Residual currents followed the bottom current pattern and moved toward north. Tides were semidiurnal to mixed semidiurnal, ranging from 1.3 to 2.0 m (Appendix S1:
Figure S2a,b). Bottom pressure sensors recorded a tidal cycle on September 11, whose range rose from 1.7 m for the preceding and following tides to 2.5 m, likely caused by the passage of a storm-triggered continental shelf wave over Newfoundland, as described by Brown (2021).

At the AS site, current speed ranged from 0 to 0.3 m s⁻¹ from July to early September (Figure 2c), rising to 0.5–0.7 m s⁻¹, mixing the water column and shifting the prior temperature amplitude. Bottom and surface currents were predominantly east-northeast, with residual currents strengthening slightly in autumn and moving northward. Tidal patterns were similar to those at PS, varying from 1.3 to 2.0 m (Appendix S1: Figure S2c,d).

## Trophic environment

Seston quantity (TPM) and quality (MTFA, fatty acid composition, food sources, trophic markers) (mean ± SE) available for recruits were homogeneous along both transects, as shown in Table 2 and Appendix S1: Table S1. Seston concentration (in milligrams per liter) and the MTFA (in micrograms per milligram) had mean values (±SE) of 4.1 ± 0.4 and 5.7 ± 0.2 at PS, and 4.9 ± 0.5 and 4.8 ± 0.1 at AS. Total bacteria consisted of high nucleic acid bacteria (HNA, 73% and 56%) and low nucleic acid bacteria (LNA, 27% and 44%) at PS-AS, respectively. Picocyanobacteria (52 ± 0.3 and 34 ± 0.5 ×10³ cell mL⁻¹) and picoeukaryotes (19 ± 2.5 and 17 ± 4.4 ×10³ cell mL⁻¹) were the first and second predominant food sources in seston at both sites;

<table><caption>TABLE 2 Mean (±SEM) of food quantity (total particulate matter, TPM, n = 8) and quality (mass of total fatty acids, MFTA—n = 6 or 8, food sources—n = 3 or 4, trophic markers) at stations D1, D2, and D3 in the pristine (PS) and anthropized (AS) sites during our sampling period from July to October 2021.</caption><thead><tr><th>Food quantity and quality</th><th>PS</th><th>AS</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TPM (mg L<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>4.1 ± 0.4</td><td>4.9 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>MTFA (µg mg<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>5.7 ± 0.2</td><td>4.8 ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Total bacteria (×10<sup>6</sup> cell mL<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>2.5 ± 0.2</td><td>1.0 ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Pico cyanobacteria (×10<sup>3</sup> cell mL<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>52 ± 0.3</td><td>34 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Nano cyanobacteria (×10<sup>3</sup> cell mL<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>0.1 ± 0.0</td><td>0.04 ± 0.0</td></tr><tr><td>Pico eukaryotes (×10<sup>3</sup> cell mL<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>19.4 ± 2.5</td><td>17.1 ± 4.4</td></tr><tr><td>Nano eukaryotes (×10<sup>3</sup> cell mL<sup>-1</sup>)</td><td>3.5 ± 0.2</td><td>3.7 ± 0.3</td></tr><tr><td>Bacteria</td><td>9.9 ± 0.1</td><td>9.8 ± 0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Degraded organic matter</td><td>37.2 ± 1.2</td><td>46.1 ± 0.9</td></tr><tr><td>Diatoms</td><td>16.5 ± 0.4</td><td>10.4 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Dinoflagellates</td><td>5.4 ± 0.3</td><td>6.4 ± 0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Green macroalgae</td><td>3.3 ± 0.1</td><td>4.4 ± 0.2</td></tr><tr><td>Brown macroalgae</td><td>10.2 ± 0.4</td><td>9.1 ± 0.6</td></tr></tbody></table>

however, concentrations of other food sources differed between them (Table 2). Fatty acid composition (FA%) was dominated by saturated fatty acids (SFA, 38%–56%), monosaturated (MUFA, 18%–31%), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA, 18%–30%) (detailed information on FA% of seston over the months in Appendix S1: Table S1). Trophic markers such as bacteria and degraded organic matter comprised more than 40% of seston available at PS and AS sites across stations (Table 2) and throughout months (Appendix S1: Table S3). Diatoms and dinoflagellates represented nearly 18%–26% in the PS and 15%–18% in the AS, suggesting that microalgae rich in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5ω3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6ω3) were available for recruits at both sites. Green and brown macroalgae together accounted for 15%–19% in the PS and 17%–19% in the AS, indicating an important contribution to the organic matter source at both sites (Table 2).

## Acoustic characterization of pristine and anthropized sites

Overall, theoretical calculations (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 106–137 dB re 1 µPa) and mean SEL<sub>1min</sub> levels (±SE, 132 ± 0.2–138 ± 0.3 dB re 1 µPa² s) at the PS site were similar throughout the months (Table 1, Appendix S1: Figure S3). In contrast, the acoustic scenario at the AS site changed completely due to pile driving operations during the same period (from 9 June to 19 October 2021), making it impossible to distinguish the vessel noise being emitted, resulting in a mixture of both. Noise levels at the AS site ranged from 143 to 154 dB re 1 µPa (SPL<sub>pk</sub>, Table 1), with monthly SEL<sub>1min</sub> levels (mean ± SE) received by the hydrophone superior to 144 ± 0.3 dB re 1 µPa² s, with maximum levels reaching 165 dB µPa² s (Appendix S1: Figure S3). Maximum SEL<sub>1min</sub> levels surpassed 160 dB re 1 µPa² s. SEL differences between the PS and AS sites were a minimum of 9 dB re 1 µPa² s in August, September, and October (Figure 3).

## Community diversity and community structure in response to anthropogenic noise

We identified a total of 373,099 and 486,134 individuals over a 4-month monitoring period in both sites. Thirty-two taxa were identified across all combined stations (D1–D3) from the noise source in both sites (Figure 4a–c), with bivalves and gastropods comprising the majority of the catch (Figure 4a–c).

Diversity indices (S, *H*′ and *J*′) displayed distinct patterns at each site (Table 3). In the PS site, species richness significantly decreased over time, with no distance or
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 3** Comparison of mean (±SE) of sound exposure level (SEL<sub>1min</sub>, dB re 1 µPa² s) experienced by invertebrates at pristine (PS—white symbol) and anthropized (AS—gray symbol) sites during August, September, and October. The red-dashed line indicates the proposed noise threshold.</figcaption></figure>

interaction effects (Table 3, Figure 5a,c). Fewer taxa were recorded in September compared to July ($t = 3.28, p = 0.004$, perms = 6641) and August ($t = 2.60, p = 0.02$, perms = 9755). Diversity and evenness both increased with distance from the source but declined over time, with no significant interaction of factors (Table 3, Figure 5c,e; detailed in Appendix S1: Table S4). The lowest values for both diversity and evenness were observed at the highest noise level (137 dB re 1 µPa at 25 m, $H' = 0.95, J' = 0.39$) compared to moderate and control levels (120 vs. 106 dB re 1 µPa, $H' = 1.18, J' = 0.47$; $H' = 1.28, J' = 0.54$). The highest diversity was recorded in July ($H' = 1.42$), while evenness peaked in both July and September ($J' = 0.55$ and 0.50).

At the AS site, species richness slightly varied only by distance from the noise source, with lowest levels at highest intensity noise (D1, 153 dB re 1 µPa at 30 m) compared to other high intensities (D2, 150 dB re 1 µPa at 144 m; D3, 143 dB re 1 µPa at 848 m; S = 12 and 11, Figure 5b, Table 3). Diversity and evenness showed a significant interaction between distance and month, with the lowest values at D3 in July and August ($H' \le 1.28; J' = 0.44–0.54$). In September, both metrics declined across all distances ($H' < 1.24; J' < 0.48$, Figure 5d,f), followed by a stabilization in evenness across distances ($J' = 0.70$), and a slight increase in diversity across intensities ($H' = 1.57–1.68$; Figure 5d).

The community composition varied in interaction with distance and month in both PS (df = 6,

$\text{pseudo-}F_{\text{Di}\times\text{Mo}} = 5.82, p < 0.001$, perms = 9910) and AS sites (df = 6, $\text{pseudo-}F_{\text{Di}\times\text{Mo}} = 16.70, p < 0.001$, perms = 9928). In the PS, community composition at high-intensity noise (D1) differed from moderate-low intensities (D2–D3), especially between D1 and D3 (SIMPER, up to 62% dissimilarity) in almost all periods (Appendix S1: Table S5). At AS, community also varied near high-intensity pile driving (D1) from other higher intensities (D2–D3) (Appendix S1: Table S5), with also a pronounced distance effect between D1 and D3 and dissimilarity (SIMPER, up to 74%). SIMPER analysis showed that these differences were driven by *H. arctica* and/or Mytilidae, which were dominant taxa across months in both sites and contributed to 60%–80% of dissimilarities. Assemblages varied significantly across months at all distances in the PS and AS, though some similar compositions occurred in the AS, especially at D1 between July and August and D2–D3 between August and September (Appendix S1: Table S5).

## Species response to noise in both sites

### *H. arctica*

In the PS site, *H. arctica* abundance varied significantly, displaying a notable interaction between distance from the noise source and month (PERMANOVA, df = 6, $\text{pseudo-}F_{\text{Di}\times\text{Mo}} = 2.90, p = 0.004$, Figure 6a). While the distance effect on *Hiatella* recruitment was not as pronounced, there was a clear temporal trend: recruitment peaked in July, reaching up to 19,260 ± 1748 individuals per collector in D1 (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 137 dB re 1 µPa, Figure 6a). In subsequent months, abundances dropped sharply (<2000 ind. collector<sup>-1</sup>) and showed no significant variation across distances (Appendix S1: Table S6). In the AS site, both distance from the noise and month interactively inhibited *H. arctica* recruitment (df = 6, $\text{pseudo-}F_{\text{Di}\times\text{Mo}} = 21.68, p < 0.001$, Figure 6b). Abundances increased with distance from the noise, and they were 2–12 times higher at D3 (SPL<sub>pk</sub>, 143 dB re 1 µPa, 1370–31,899 individuals) compared to D1 across all months (153 dB re 1 µPa, 165–7347 individuals; Figure 6b). As in the PS site, recruitment peaked in July for all distances from the source, followed by a sharp reduction from August to October (Figure 6b, refer to Appendix S1: Table S6).

### Mytilidae

In contrast to *H. arctica*, patterns of early recruitment were much clearer according to distance but also opposite between sites. In both sites, the abundance of recruits of Mytilidae was influenced by the distance from the source
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 4** Heatmap of bivalve (blue gradient, a), gastropod (orange-brown gradient, b), and echinoderm (green gradient, c) taxa found in artificial collectors at D1 (25–30 m), D2 (144–175 m), and D3 (848–890 m) distances from anthropogenic sounds in both experimental sites pristine (PS) and anthropized (AS) from July to October 2021.</figcaption></figure>

and month (PS, PERMANOVA, df = 6, pseudo-$F_{DixMo}$ = 9.76, *p* < 0.001; AS, df = 6, pseudo-$F_{DixMo}$ = 7.17, *p* < 0.001). In the PS, recruits were notably less abundant in the collectors moored at D3 (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 106 dB re 1 µPa, 398–1396 individuals) in comparison with D1 and D2 (137 vs. 120 dB re 1 µPa, 1814–7253 individuals vs. 913–3873 individuals, please refer to Appendix S1: Table S6). The most pronounced decrease occurred between D1 and D3 in

October, coinciding with the peak abundance of Mytilidae (7253 vs. 1396, Figure 6c). Throughout the early recruitment season, Mytilidae abundances gradually increased over time so that they were 4.5 to 5.0-fold higher (>400%) at D1 when compared to D3 (Figure 6c). Over the monitoring period, recruit abundances showed a 4- to 5-fold increase among intensities in the AS site (SPL<sub>pk</sub>, 153 dB re 1 µPa, 46–186 individuals; 150 dB re 1 µPa: 61–288
<table><caption>TABLE 3 Results of two-way permutational multivariate analyses (PERMANOVA) testing the effect of station distances (Di, 3 levels), month (Mo, 4 levels) and their interaction (Di × Mo) on species richness (S), Shannon–Weiner diversity (H’), and Pielou’s evenness (J’’) on the assemblages of bivalves, gastropods and echinoderms retrieved from collectors moored at different distances on transects at pristine site (PS) and at anthropized site (AS).</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2">Sites</th><th colspan="4">Species richness (S)</th><th colspan="4">Shannon–Wiener diversity (H')</th><th colspan="4">Pielou's evenness (J')</th></tr><tr><th>df</th><th>Pseudo-F</th><th>p (Monte Carlo)</th><th>Perm</th><th>df</th><th>Pseudo-F</th><th>p (Monte Carlo)</th><th>Perm</th><th>df</th><th>Pseudo-F</th><th>p (Monte Carlo)</th><th>Perm</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="13"><strong>PS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Di</td><td>2</td><td>1.08</td><td>0.35</td><td>9952</td><td>2</td><td>16.01</td><td><strong>0.0002</strong></td><td>9961</td><td>2</td><td>21.80</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9956</td></tr><tr><td>Mo</td><td>3</td><td>4.19</td><td><strong>0.01</strong></td><td>9953</td><td>3</td><td>19.19</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9961</td><td>3</td><td>21.29</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9947</td></tr><tr><td>Di × Mo</td><td>6</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.53</td><td>9944</td><td>6</td><td>2.08</td><td>0.08</td><td>9955</td><td>6</td><td>2.27</td><td>0.06</td><td>9936</td></tr><tr><td colspan="13"><strong>AS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Di</td><td>2</td><td>7.50</td><td><strong>0.002</strong></td><td>9963</td><td>2</td><td>25.56</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9965</td><td>2</td><td>22.16</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9953</td></tr><tr><td>Mo</td><td>3</td><td>1.68</td><td>0.19</td><td>9935</td><td>3</td><td>55.63</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9954</td><td>3</td><td>57.07</td><td><strong>0.0001</strong></td><td>9963</td></tr><tr><td>Di × Mo</td><td>6</td><td>0.38</td><td>0.97</td><td>9941</td><td>6</td><td>6.13</td><td><strong>0.0008</strong></td><td>9957</td><td>6</td><td>4.37</td><td><strong>0.001</strong></td><td>9942</td></tr></tbody></table>

Note: Significant values (p < 0.05) are indicated in bold.

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>FIGURE 5 Box plot of species richness (S), Shannon–Wiener diversity (H’), and Pielou’s evenness (J’’) of assemblages obtained from collectors placed at different stations: D1 (25–30 m), D2 (144–175 m), and D3 (848–890 m) near anthropogenic noise sources in the pristine (PS, a, c, e) or anthropized (AS, b, d, f) site across 4 months—July, August, September, and October 2021. Boxes represent 25th and 75th quartiles. Whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Solid line is median, symbol plus “+” is the mean. Dissimilar letters indicate significant difference in post hoc analysis.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 6** Box plots of abundances of the two most dominant bivalves *Hiatella arctica* (a, b) and *Mytilidae* (c, d) at different distances (D1, 25–30 m; D2, 144–175 m; and D3, 848–890 m) from anthropogenic sounds during our experimental period from July to October in the pristine (PS, a, c) and anthropized sites (AS, b, d). Boxes represent 25th and 75th quartiles. Whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Solid line is median, symbol plus “+” is mean. Dissimilar letters indicate significant difference in post hoc analysis.</figcaption></figure>

individuals; 143 dB re 1 µPa: 112–433 individuals), suggesting a clear avoidance of noisy conditions. In general, abundances were much lower in July (46–186 individuals, Figure 6d, detailed in Appendix S1: Table S6) than in the other months.

### *P. magellanicus*

*P. magellanicus* recruits were only collected in October in both sites, and their abundance was similar between distance in the PS (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 23–43 individuals, PERMANOVA, df = 2, pseudo-F<sub>Di</sub> = 2.79, *p* = 0.11, Figure 7a) whereas they increased by 2-fold with distance (SPL<sub>pk</sub>, df = 2, pseudo-F<sub>Di</sub> = 13.72, *p* = 0.001) from D1 to D3 in the AS site (153–143 dB re 1 µPa, 32, 48, 77 individuals, t<sub>D1-D3</sub> = 5.14, *p* = 0.001; t<sub>D2-D3</sub> = 2.391, *p* = 0.048; Figure 7b).

### *Lacuna* sp.

In PS, *Lacuna* sp. recruitment was influenced by both distance from source (PERMANOVA, df = 2, pseudo-F<sub>Di</sub> = 11.47, *p* = 0.001) and month (df = 3, pseudo-F<sub>Mo</sub> = 24.37, *p* = 0.001) without interaction of factors (Figure 8a). Recruit abundance decreased from 580 to 329 ind. collector<sup>-1</sup> across D1 to D3 (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 137 dB–106 dB re 1 µPa, t<sub>D1-D2</sub> = 2.02, *p* = 0.04; t<sub>D1-D3</sub> = 5.12, *p* < 0.001; t<sub>D2-D3</sub> = 2.68, *p* = 0.01, Figure 8a) peaking in September (771 individuals, t<sub>Jul-Sept</sub> = 7.76, *p* < 0.001; t<sub>Aug-Sept</sub> = 5.121, *p* < 0.001; t<sub>Sept-Oct</sub> = 7.583, *p* < 0.001). In the AS site, the pattern was inverse, and there was a significant interaction between both factors for *Lacuna* sp. abundances (df = 6, pseudo-F<sub>DixMo</sub> = 15.325, *p* < 0.001). In this site, recruit abundance was ~3-fold higher at D3 than at D1 across months (SPL<sub>pk</sub> 140 vs. 153 dB re 1 µPa; 136 vs. 417, 225 vs. 641, 673 vs. 1331 individuals), except in October when abundances
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**FIGURE 7** Box plots of *Placopecten magellanicus* abundances in pristine (PS, a) and anthropized (AS, b) sites per distances from the sound (D1, 25–30 m; D2, 144–175 m; and D3, 848–890 m) over October. Boxes represent lower (25%) and upper (75%) quartiles. Whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Solid line is median, and the mean is represented by the symbol plus “+.” Dissimilar letters indicate significant difference in post hoc analysis, and ns refers to non-significant results.</figcaption></figure>

were similar among distances. The highest peak of early
recruitment was observed in September (Figure 8b,
Appendix S1: Table S6).

*Skenea* sp.

*Skenea* sp. abundances varied significantly with distance and month at both sites (details in Appendix S1: Table S6) (PS: PERMANOVA, df = 6, pseudo-F<sub>DixMo</sub> = 3.97, *p* = 0.001, perms = 9940; AS: df = 6, pseudo-F<sub>DixMo</sub> = 16.57, *p* < 0.001, perms = 9932, Figure 8c,d). In the PS, abundances decreased with distance from the noise source and over time (526 vs. 319, 107 vs. 23 individuals). Overall, higher abundances were firstly observed in D1, and later in D1–D2 (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 137–120 dB re 1 µPa, Figure 8c). In the AS, D1 and D2 consistently showed 2- to 3-fold higher abundances compared to D3 (SPL<sub>pk</sub>, 153–150 vs. 143 dB re 1 µPa, 104 and 247 vs. 46 individuals, 184 and 259 vs. 118 individuals, Figure 8d), suggesting a possible stimulation effect on D1–D2 versus D3 over 3 months. Temporal patterns showed that *Skenea* sp. recruitment peaked at different times across noise intensities: D1–D2 had similar high abundances in July and September (184 vs. 172, 247 vs. 259, D1–D2), while D3

peaked later, between September and October (118–142
individuals).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, the present study provides the first
field evidence of ecological shifts at the community and
species level during early recruitment in response to
anthropogenic noise.

Pristine and anthropized sites differ in
environmental conditions and soundscapes

The SPM archipelago experiences extreme thermal oscilla-
tions, with temperatures shifting by up to 11°C in 90 min
during September, driven by nonlinear internal waves ampli-
fied by diurnal tides (Lazure et al., 2018). These fluctuations
are more pronounced at 30–60 m depths than in shallower
waters (<20 m). Temperature conditions were homogeneous
across stations within each site, and seasonal shifts were evi-
dent, aligning with previous studies (Bridier et al., 2021;
Lazure et al., 2018; Poitevin et al., 2020). Given that tempera-
ture is a key factor regulating the physiology and behavior of
bivalves and gastropods (Bayne, 1965; Pechenik, 1990;
Tremblay et al., 1998), short and intense thermal events
caused by internal waves may impose significant stress on
recruits (Garwood et al., 2020; Woodson, 2018), likely in the
AS. These site-specific dynamics highlight the complex rela-
tionship between temperature and bivalve development in
SPM (Poitevin et al., 2020).

Hydrodynamic conditions, including turbulence and
current flow, influence larval behavior and distribution,
and ultimately settlement, with bivalves and gastropods
showing preferences for water motion and turbulence
depending on their habitat (Fuchs et al., 2018; Pernet
et al., 2003; Tremblay et al., 2020). In addition, to expose
larvae to temporary thermal stress, internal waves can
affect larval transport, potentially facilitating larvae's
final delivery to settlement sites (see references and dis-
cussion in Garwood et al., 2020; Woodson, 2018). In this
study, weak bottom and residual currents likely pro-
moted recruit retention during the early months along
both transects. After mid-September, bottom current inten-
sities peaked at the AS site, coinciding with a stronger ther-
mal gradient (7–10°C), possibly linked to internal wave
activity in August–September. These changes may have
disrupted larval delivery, with fewer larvae reaching sta-
tions across the transect at the AS site. Furthermore,
inshore current patterns did not favor recruit accumulation
near collectors close to the noise source, as depicted by
ADCP figures (D1, refer to Appendix S1: Figure S1b–d).
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**FIG URE 8** Box plots of (a, b) *Lacuna* sp. and (c, d) *Skenea* sp. abundances per station from the sound (D1, 25–30 m; D2, 144–175 m; and D3, 848–890 m) during our experimental period from July to October 2021 in the pristine site (PS) and anthropic site (AS). Boxes show 25th and 75th quartiles, while whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Solid line is median; symbol “+” denotes the mean. Dissimilar letters indicate significant difference in post hoc analysis.</figcaption></figure>

The trophic environment plays a key role in
supporting larval development and recruitment by sup-
plying nutritional resources and acting as a cue,

synchronizing settlement-recruitment events, as
observed in *Mytilus edulis*, *Mytilidae*, and *Crassostrea
gigas* in temperate habitats (Androuin et al., 2022;
Lagarde et al., 2018; Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al., 2012). Consistent with Bridier et al. (2021) and Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al. (2012), the pelagic trophic environment in SPM, including PS and AS, is oligotrophic. This was supported by the high proportions of bacterial and degraded organic matter markers (>40%, Table 2) and elevated bacterial concentrations in the potential food source (1.0–2.5 × 10⁶ cells mL⁻¹, Table 2). Flow cytometry data indicated a dominance of picoplankton (picocyanobacteria and picoeukaryotes, Table 2, and Appendix S1: Table S3) over nanoplankton at both sites, likely contributing to the diet of local filter feeders. Food quantity (TPM) and quality available (MFTA, trophic markers, food sources) were consistent across distances at each site. However, the PS site showed greater food availability and quality than the AS site, including higher proportions of diatom markers and evidence of diatom blooms in September and October, confirming secondary autumnal blooms in SPM (Bridier et al., 2021). Importantly, similar trophic conditions across distances ruled out trophic variation as a confounding factor when assessing the effects of noise in our trials.

Soundscapes differed markedly between the PS site (vessel noise, SPL<sub>rms</sub> = 106–137 dB re 1 µPa) and AS site (mix of pile driving and vessel noise, SPL<sub>pk</sub> > 140 dB re 1 µPa), where a combination of pile driving and vessel noise produced higher sound levels. Correspondingly, organisms were exposed to different sound exposure levels (PS: 132–138 dB re 1 µPa² s vs. AS: >140 dB re 1 µPa² s). Recent research shows that impulsive and continuous noises differ acoustically and can reduce habitat sensitivity, causing varied behavioral and physiological effects depending on sound pressure, frequency, and distance from source (for review, see Bonnel et al., 2022; Solé et al., 2023). Given that both physical and trophic conditions were overall consistent across sampling distances within each site, the observed patterns (species distribution, settlement, and early recruitment) are more likely attributed to the noise gradient rather than environmental variability.

## Impact of noise on biodiversity features of recruit assemblages

In the past years, researchers have increasingly underlined the need for field-based assessments of anthropogenic impacts on marine ecosystems. Yet, significant gaps remain in understanding how anthropogenic noise affects biodiversity and population dynamics (Kunc et al., 2016; Solé et al., 2023; Sordello et al., 2020). This study provides the first field evidence of invertebrate

community shifts due to anthropogenic noise exposure. Recruit diversity and evenness shifts aligned with the nature and intensity of the noise source: introducing vessel noise at the PS site (137 dB re 1 µPa, SEL < 132–138 dB 1 µPa² s) led to lower diversity and evenness (*H' and J') near the source favoring stress-tolerant species, while higher intensity mixed noises at the AS site (SPL<sub>pk</sub> > 143 dB re 1 µPa, SEL > 140 dB re 1 µPa² s) were associated with differences in *H' and *J' indices, greater species turnover, and higher diversity at moderate intensity (D2) due to rare species in August and October. Such diversity increase at D2 could be in line with the *intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH)* proposed by Connell (1978) where diversity is highest at intermediate levels of disturbance due to the trade-off in the presence of common and rare species. We suggest that a threshold below <140 dB re 1 µPa² s is required to avoid changes in community structure.

While terrestrial studies report declines in bird species richness under anthropogenic traffic noise (Perillo et al., 2017; Proppe et al., 2013), and unchanged biodiversity of amphibians under turbine audio recordings at 500 m (Trowbridge & Litzgus, 2022), such comparisons are limited given the propagation of sound in water (Bonnel et al., 2022; Farina, 2014; NRC, 2003). Despite the growing interest and urgent need to develop threshold criteria based on sound pressure level and sound exposure thresholds (SPL, dB re 1 µPa and SEL, dB re 1 µPa² s) to prevent several biological effects in marine fauna, frameworks connecting noise disturbances and impulsive and continuous noises have been mostly developed for marine mammals, and to an extent for fish (see Bonnel et al., 2022 for a detailed review; NFMS, 2018; NRC, 2003; Popper et al., 2014). In general, behavior modifications are seen in different groups of marine mammals when SPL and SEL of impulsive sounds are above 224 dB re 1 µPa and 173 dB re 1 µPa² s (references in Bonnel et al., 2022, p. 84). Auditory effects such as temporary threshold shift (TTS) in different hearing groups may occur if continuous sounds are above 153 dB re 1 µPa² s (SEL<sub>cum</sub>), with higher SPL and SEL thresholds for impulsive noises like pile driving (196 dB re 1 µPa and 140 dB re 1 µPa² s) (references cited within Bonnel et al., 2022, p. 86; NMFS, 2018). Fish injury thresholds, depending on hearing group, are set at 183–187 dB re 1 µPa² s (SEL<sub>cum</sub>) and 206 dB re 1 µPa (SPL<sub>pk</sub>), while TTS is above 186 dB re 1 µPa² s (SEL) for pile driving. For fish behavioral effects under ship or pile driving exposure, the threshold is set at 150 dB re 1 µPa, uncertain if it is SPL<sub>pk</sub> or SPL<sub>rms</sub> (Popper et al., 2014, p. 35).

Community diversity and stability depend on recruitment processes such as predation and competition (Austen et al., 2002; Butman, 1987; Fraschetti et al., 2003), and
secondary migrations—key mechanisms in the movement of *M. edulis*, *H. arctica*, and *Lacuna vincuta* (Forêt et al., 2018; Le Corre et al., 2013; Martel & Chia, 1991; Veillard et al., 2023). In this 4-month study, we accounted for these post-settlement processes (Hunt & Scheibling, 1997). Predation, a major source of settler mortality (Beal et al., 2020; Gosselin & Qian, 1997; O'Connor et al., 2008), was likely minimal here due to the scarcity (<10%) or absence of sea stars and crabs. Interspecific competition, often affecting growth and survival in aquaculture collectors (Cyr et al., 2007; Garcia et al., 2003; Khalaman, 2005), likely had little effect due to the short deployment (1-month). Although noise may disrupt both predation and competition (Chan et al., 2010; Roberts et al., 2015), its role remains unclear in situ. However, we noticed a high proportion of larger recruits (10%–80%, >500 µm) of Mytilidae and *Lacuna* sp. were concentrated near the noise source (137 dB re 1 µPa) in the PS site, suggesting that vessel noise may trigger secondary migrations. Conversely, in the AS site, larger recruits of *H. arctica*, Mytilidae, and *P. magellanicus* were more abundant farther from the pile driving source (143 dB re 1 µPa, 40%–90%, species-dependent), supporting that mixed noises may differently influence post-settlement movement. Further research is needed to understand how anthropogenic noise shapes post-settlement dispersal.

Given the species-specific responses noticed in this study, we present site-specific findings to showcase contrasting patterns and propose potential sound pressure and noise exposure thresholds that may elicit invertebrate behavioral responses.

## Should I stay or should I go? Toward identifying a noise threshold for recruitment

Early studies with oysters suggest that the exposure to acoustic cues may alter developmental trajectories or trigger physiological responses that interact with other settlement cues. A recent study has demonstrated that this orientation in oyster larvae may go beyond vertical orientation, as larvae exhibited horizontal movements along a reef sound gradient, in field and lab studies (Williams et al., 2022). Research also suggests that larvae may prioritize certain cues—pulse of phytoplankton versus biofilm (Toupoint, Gilmore-Solomon, et al., 2012; Toupoint, Mohit, et al., 2012)—or interpret them as positive or negative, as with algae versus predator (Morello & Yund, 2016). Because vessel noise and pile driving fall within invertebrate hearing ranges (Chauvaud et al., 2018; Duarte et al., 2021), they can mask critical ambient cues and interfere with larval behaviors during

habitat selection and settlement (Fuchs et al., 2018; Kingsford et al., 2002; Lillis et al., 2013, 2015).

## Pristine site versus anthropized site

In this study, early recruitment patterns were strongly influenced by the anthropogenic soundscape, with site-specific shifts corresponding to SPL and SEL thresholds. At the pristine site (PS), vessel SPLs decreased from high-moderate intensities (137–120 dB re 1 µPa) to control (106 dB re 1 µPa), and SELs remained below 138 dB re 1 µPa² s. Under these high-moderate conditions, recruitment of Mytilidae, *H. arctica*, *Lacuna* sp., and *Skenea* sp. was 3- to 5-fold enhanced, while trends of *P. magellanicus* were inconclusive due to limited sampling. The similar responses among most taxa here suggest that a threshold of 132–138 dB re 1 µPa² s may elicit behavioral change, increasing early recruitment near the vessel noise source. In contrast, the anthropized site (AS) experienced cumulative noise from pile driving and vessel noise, with SPLs exceeding 140 dB re 1 µPa and SELs above 140 dB re 1 µPa² s. In these circumstances, recruitment of most taxa declined 2- to 3-fold, except *Skenea* sp., which increased by a similar magnitude.

While studies on bivalve or gastropod settlement under noise exposure remain scarce in situ, insights can be drawn from laboratory-based trials about the behavior under certain vessel noise or pile driving exposure (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, SPL<sub>pk</sub>). The stimulation pattern seen in bivalve and gastropods aligns with the following studies. Veillard et al. (2025) observed a 2-fold increase in mussel settlement and metamorphosis under higher vessel noise compared to control levels (SPL<sub>rms</sub>, 151 vs. 116 dB re 1 µPa) using the *Larvosonic* system, which simulates a sound gradient from the sound source (see Olivier et al., 2023 for details). This suggests a similar behavioral shift as in the PS. In contrast, Jolivet et al. (2016) revealed a 27% increase after 67 h of noise exposure (127 dB re 1 µPa, 100–1000 Hz), while Cervello et al. (2023) found no differences between control and boat noise treatments (128 and 139 dB re 1 µPa). However, the differences in these two studies may stem from the fact that the first experiments were conducted in tanks where several acoustical biases can occur such as resonance and reverberations, whereas the absence of water motion as in the natural environment was one of the main issues in Cervello et al. (2023). The slight stimulation of *H. arctica* abundances toward vessel noise at the PS is a new result since there is no research using this species as a biological model for noise impact. Given the habitat overlap of mytilids and *Hiatella* (Garcia et al., 2003), we suggest that similar behavioral effects may occur to noise threshold at the PS.
For gastropods, few studies exist—Stocks et al. (2012) reported increases in swimming activity despite not describing sound levels, while Solé et al. (2021) documented statocyst damage at a wave sweep of 157 dB 1 µPa (50–400 Hz). As *Lacuna* sp. recruitment increased near high-moderate (120–137 dB re 1 µPa, D1–D2) at PS, we hypothesize that their presence near the source may reflect a behavioral threshold near 132–138 dB re 1 µPa² s in the PS.

For pile driving sources in the anthropized site (AS), Cervello et al. (2023) noticed a downward trend in mussel settlement under pile driving and control treatments in *Larvosonic* trials (166.4 vs. 128 dB re 1 µPa), though their results were not statistically significant. Scallop recruitment also declined near pile driving sources (>150 dB re 1 µPa), contrasting with controlled studies using a pectinid, *Pecten maximus*, which showed no survival or metamorphosis declines at even higher pile driving sounds (*Larvosonic*, SPL<sub>pp</sub> 148–188 re 1 µPa, Gigot, Olivier, et al., 2023; Olivier et al., 2023). Nonetheless, stress responses have been recorded in *P. magellanicus* juveniles in situ at lower SEL (SEL<sub>ss</sub> < 94.39 dB re 1 µm s<sup>-2</sup> at 8 m), suggesting that our higher exposures (SEL > 140 dB re 1 µPa<sup>2</sup> s) may have triggered similar responses that potentially interfered with settlement or feeding (Robson et al., 2012). Likewise, *Lacuna* sp. abundances declined under higher intensities (150–153 dB re 1 µPa); we propose that abundance decreases at D1–D2 may result from auditory damage at higher exposure (above 140 dB re 1 µPa<sup>2</sup> s), consistent with auditory damage observed by Solé et al. (2021).

Though the mechanism of hearing in invertebrates remains poorly understood (Chauvaud et al., 2018), evidence suggests that they detect particle motion via statocysts, allowing perception and orientation toward sound sources (Hawkins & Popper, 2017). This sensory system becomes more complex after metamorphosis and involves different structures at specific life stages (references in Solé et al., 2023; Zhadan, 2005). In addition to statocysts in the ciliated foot, superficial mechanoreceptors on the epidermis work as accelerometers (Budelmann, 1992; Cragg & Nott, 1977; Roberts et al., 2015).

Several potential mechanisms may underlie the observed responses to vessel noise and mixed noises. Beyond sound intensity, frequency is critical, as many invertebrates produce and perceive a range of sounds that overlap natural and anthropogenic sources (Chauvaud et al., 2018; Roberts et al., 2015; Zhadan, 2005). In this study, the low-frequency vessel sound may have mimicked some natural cues from rocky shores/waves, attracting larvae, as initially proposed by Jolivet et al. (2016). Additionally, in the absence of physical, chemical, or natural acoustic cues, anthropogenic sounds (e.g., vessel) may fill in

as substitute signals with similar acoustic signatures, modifying larval behavior and accelerating this transition. However, when vessel and pile driving noises were combined, the resulting higher intensity and threshold may have indicated suboptimal conditions for most taxa, as strong substrate-borne vibrations and particle motion near the source could interfere with valve closure or foot extension, as suggested by Jézéquel et al. (2022) and Roberts et al. (2015).

Considering our findings, we suggest a sound exposure threshold not exceeding 140 dB re 1 µPa² s as a potential upper limit for maintaining normal recruitment patterns of key invertebrate species. Below this level (132–138 dB re 1 µPa² s), early recruitment of several species was enhanced or unaffected, which needs to be interpreted with caution here as this could impair selectivity and increase metabolic stress in post-metamorphic stages (Veillard et al., 2025). While these thresholds are broadly consistent with preliminary criteria for marine mammals and fishes (Bonnel et al., 2022; NMFS, 2018; Popper et al., 2014), more studies should be carried out to obtain complete dose-response curves and validate these proposed levels.

## FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

This study demonstrates that anthropogenic noise alters marine community diversity and evenness, affecting recruitment of stress-tolerant species in situ depending on noise nature and thresholds. This is the first field study to examine the effect of noise on marine community traits and propose a preliminary threshold for invertebrates (<140 dB re 1 µPa² s). While several gaps remain unaddressed in noise impact studies (Duarte et al., 2021; Hawkins & Popper, 2017; Solé et al., 2023), we highlight three areas requiring further attention:

1. Environmental stressors—such as anthropogenic soundscapes, temperature shifts, and food availability—may cause latent effects in young juveniles that persist, amplify, or compensate over time (Lagarde et al., 2018; Martel et al., 2014; Podolsky & Moran, 2006). For example, delayed metamorphosis, triggered by low temperature or insufficient trophic conditions, have been referred as amplification effects, which might result in a decrease in larval energetic reserves available to metamorphose, reduced ability to identify specific cues to settle and in the end, reduced fitness, survival, and growth in juveniles and adults (Hunt & Scheibling, 1997; Pechenik, 2006; Podolsky & Moran, 2006). Noise exposure has been pointed out as a new trigger of amplifying and compensating latent effects. Gigot et al. (2024)
found that scallops (*P. maximus*) exposed to moderate
pile driving noise produced fewer eggs than control con-
dition (SPL<sub>pp</sub> 148 vs. 100 dB re 1 µPa), but their larvae
exhibited enhanced growth—a cross-generational
response that likely amplifies the survival of offspring.
Although we did not measure size at metamorphosis,
previous studies on oysters suggest that larvae settling
earlier (at smaller sizes) achieved higher recruitment
success (Lagarde et al., 2018). These findings highlight
the need to better understand how interacting stressors
may produce latent effects that compromise recruitment
in the Anthropocene era.

2. In situ experiments offer greater ecological realism than laboratory studies, despite reduced experimental control (Spicer, 2014). Despite some design constraints, this study successfully accounted for major confounding factors (temperature, trophic conditions, currents) and proposes a realistic baseline threshold (>140 dB re 1 µPa² s) for inhibited recruitment across taxa. This threshold may offer guidance for conservation policy. Future research should validate these levels by examining long-term physiological response, trophic quality available in situ, temperature and ecological interactions under single and multiple noise exposures.

3. The post-settlement phase of bivalve and gastropods—often downplayed due to high mortality—plays a critical role in population dynamics. These relocations are prompted not only by environmental conditions but also by the active behavior of post-larvae (Forêt et al., 2018; Le Corre et al., 2013; Leal et al., 2022; Martel & Diefenbach, 1993). Noise may disrupt these secondary migrations, influencing substrate choice and habitat selection. A shift to a less suitable habitat could undermine population replenishment, particularly in disturbed intertidal zones. More research is needed to understand how noise affects this phase of the benthic life cycle.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

*Study conception*: Réjean Tremblay, Frédéric Olivier, and Nathália Byrro Gauthier. *Methodology*: Réjean Tremblay, Frédéric Olivier, Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Gesche Winkler, Tarik Meziane, Pascal Lazure, Delphine Mathias, Laurent Chauvaud, Antoine Frémont, and Sylvain Chauvaud. *Data collection*: Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Thomas Uboldi, and Delphine Mathias. *Data analysis*: Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Delphine Mathias, and Pascal Lazure. *Drafting the article*: Nathália Byrro Gauthier. *Review and editing*: Nathália Byrro Gauthier, Thomas Uboldi, Réjean Tremblay, Frédéric Olivier, Gesche Winkler, Tarik Meziane, Pascal Lazure, Delphine Mathias, Laurent Chauvaud, Antoine Frémont, and Sylvain Chauvaud. *Supervision*: Réjean Tremblay, Gesche

Winkler, and Tarik Meziane. *Project administration*: Réjean Tremblay and Frédéric Olivier. *Funding acquisition*: Réjean Tremblay, Frédéric Olivier, and Gesche Winkler. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. This manuscript is a contribution to the strategic cluster Ressource Aquatique Québec (RAQ).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to all participants who provided technical and logistical support so this research could be conducted. Therefore, we wish to acknowledge J. Grall (IUEM) for providing material and laboratory infrastructure for the initial training in the LEMAR, M. Chynel and N. Thiney (BOREA-MNHN) for their support on FA analysis and training, C. Belzile (ISMER-UQAR) for his contribution on flow cytometry analyses, E. Bossier and E. Amice for the multiple scuba diving operations to install equipment, retrieve samples, and any other support provided during sampling, and last but not least all the members of the Diving Club in Saint-Pierre for helping during fieldwork and providing all infrastructure to stock the samples. We also deeply thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions that helped to strengthen this manuscript. This study is part of the PhD of NBG, imbedded in the international AUDITIF project (Acoustic impact of ship traffic on mussels and scallops of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence) with collaborations between UQAR-ISMER, BeBEST-UBO, and BOREA-MNHN supported by the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec Nature et Technologies (FRQNT 280057) and the French National Research Agency (ANR-19-FQSM-0005, 10.69777/280057) through the French-Québec maritime funding program. Supplementary funds were also obtained from Ressources Aquatiques Québec Research Network (RAQ, FRQNT, no. 2020-RS4-265329, 10.69777/265329). This study was financed by those agencies, in which NBG received an excellence and a graduate research scholarship from ISMER-UQAR, MITACS (IT-23610), and the NSERC Discovery Grant to Gesche Winkler. This study is a contribution to the BeBEST2 International Research Project (CNRS INEE/LEMAR and UQAR/ISMER).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data and code (Byrro Gauthier, 2025) are available in
Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29708534.

ORCID

*Nathália Byrro Gauthier* https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-3013
Thomas Uboldi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9946-5796

Frédéric Olivier https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-8761

Réjean Tremblay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-8915

Laurent Chauvaud https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-7863

Delphine Mathias https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-1576

Pascal Lazure https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-8785

Tarik Meziane https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-6441

Gesche Winkler https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-4576

## REFERENCES

Anderson, M. J. 2001. "A New Method for Non-Parametric Multi-variate Analysis of Variance." *Austral Ecology* 26(1): 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x.

Androuin, T., P. Barbier, M. Forêt, T. Meziane, M. Thomas, P. Archambault, G. Winkler, R. Tremblay, and F. Olivier. 2022. "Pull the Trigger: Interplay between Benthic and Pelagic Cues Driving the Early Recruitment of a Natural Bivalve Assemblage." *Ecosphere* 13(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3672.

Aucoin, F., S. Doiron, and M. Nadeau. 2004. *Guide to Sampling and Identifying Larvae of Species of Maricultural Interest*. Publication G005. Gaspé: MAPAQ.

Austen, M. C., P. J. D. Lambshead, P. A. Hutchings, G. Boucher, P. V. R. Snelgrove, C. Heip, G. King, I. Koike, and C. Smith. 2002. "Biodiversity Links above and below the Marine Sediment-Water Interface that May Influence Community Stability." *Biodiversity and Conservation* 11(1): 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014098917535.

Baden, S., B. Hernroth, and O. Lindahl. 2021. "Declining Populations of *Mytilus* spp. in North Atlantic Coastal Waters-A Swedish Perspective." *Journal of Shellfish Research* 40(2): 269-296. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.040.0207.

Bayne, B. L. 1965. "Growth and the Delay of Metamorphosis of the Larvae of *Mytilus edulis* (L.)." *Ophelia* 2(1): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1965.10409596.

Beal, B. F., C. R. Coffin, S. F. Randall, C. A. Goodenow, K. E. Pepperman, and B. W. Ellis. 2020. "Interactive Effects of Shell Hash and Predator Exclusion on 0-Year Class Recruits of Two Infaunal Intertidal Bivalve Species in Maine, USA." *Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology* 530-531(September): 151441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2020.151441.

Belzile, C., S. Brugel, C. Nozais, Y. Gratton, and S. Demers. 2008. "Variations of the Abundance and Nucleic Acid Content of Heterotrophic Bacteria in Beaufort Shelf Waters during Winter and Spring." *Journal of Marine Systems* 74(3-4): 946-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.12.010.

Bonnel, J., S. Chauvaud, L. Chauvaud, J. Mars, D. Mathias, and F. Olivier. 2022. *Effets Des Sons Anthropiques Sur La Faune Marine. Effets Des Sons Anthropiques Sur La Faune Marine*. Editions Quae Ebooks, Versailles CEDEX https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-3545-2.

Breeze, H., V. Nolet, D. Thomson, A. J. Wright, E. Marotte, and M. Sanders. 2022. "Efforts to Advance Underwater Noise Management in Canada: Introduction to the Marine Pollution Bulletin Special Issue." *Marine Pollution Bulletin* 178: 113596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113596.

Bridier, G., T. Meziane, J. Grall, L. Chauvaud, S. Donnet, P. Lazure, and F. Olivier. 2021. "Sources, Quality and Transfers of Organic Matter in a Highly-Stratified Sub-Arctic Coastal System (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon, NW Atlantic)." *Progress in Oceanography* 190 (November): 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102483.

Brown, D. P. 2021. "National Hurricane Centre Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Larry." https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL122021_Larry.pdf.

Budelmann, B. U. 1992. "Hearing in Nonarthropod Invertebrates." In *The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing*, edited by D. B. Webster, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay, 141-155. New York: Springer Verlag New York Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2784-7_10.

Butman, C. A. 1987. "Larval Settlement of Soft-Sediment Invertebrates." *Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review* 25: 113-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0254(88)92636-2.

Byrro Gauthier, N. 2025. "Anthropogenic Noise Effect on Early Recruitment and Diversity of Marine Invertebrates." Figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.fishshare.29708534.v1.

Campagne, C. S., L. A. Roy, J. Langridge, J. Claudet, R. Mongruel, D. Beillouin, and É. Thiébaut. 2023. "Existing Evidence on the Impact of Changes in Marine Ecosystem Structure and Functioning on Ecosystem Service Delivery: A Systematic Map." *Environmental Evidence* 12(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00306-1.

Cervello, G., F. Olivier, L. Chauvaud, G. Winkler, D. Mathias, F. Juanes, and R. Tremblay. 2023. "Impact of Anthropogenic Sounds (Pile Driving, Drilling and Vessels) on the Development of Model Species Involved in Marine Biofouling." *Frontiers in Marine Science* 10: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1111505.

Chan, A. A., P. Giraldo-Perez, S. Smith, and D. T. Blumstein. 2010. "Anthropogenic Noise Affects Risk Assessment and Attention: The Distracted Prey Hypothesis." *Biology Letters* 6(4): 458-461. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.1081.

Chauvaud, S., L. Chauvaud, and A. Jolivet. 2018. *Impacts des sons anthropiques sur la faune marine*. Versailles: Edition Quae. 112 p.

Connell, J. H. 1978. "Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs." *Science* 199(4335): 1302-10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.199.4335.1302.

Cragg, S. M., and J. A. Nott. 1977. "The Ultrastructure of the Stato-cysts in the Pediveliger Larvae of *Pecten maximus* (L.) (Bivalvia)." *Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology* 27(1): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(77)90051-X.

Cyr, C., B. Myrand, G. Cliche, and G. Desrosiers. 2007. "Weekly Spat Collection of Sea Scallop, *Placopecten magellanicus*, and Undesirable Species as a Potential Tool to Predict an Optimal Deployment Period of Collectors." *Journal of Shellfish Research* 26(4): 1045-54. https://doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[1045:WSCSS]2.0.co;2.

Dreujou, E., C. W. McKindsey, C. Grant, L. de Tréau Coeli, R. St-Louis, and P. Archambault. 2020. "Biodiversity and Habitat Assessment of Coastal Benthic Communities in a Sub-Arctic Industrial Harbor Area." *Water (Basel)* 12(9): 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092424.
Duarte, C. M., L. Chapuis, S. P. Collin, D. P. Costa, R. P. Devassy, V. M. Eguiluz, C. Erbe, et al. 2021. "The Soundscape of the Anthropocene Ocean." *Science* 371(6529): eaba4658. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba4658.

Dubois, J.-M. M. 2010. "Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon Islands." In *Encyclopaedia of the World's Coastal Landforms*, edited by E. C. F. Bird, 163-65. Dordrecht: Springer Ebooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8639-7_22.

Dunbar, M. J. 1954. "Arctic Research: The Current Status of Research and Some Immediate Problems in the North American Arctic and Subarctic. Edited by Diana Rowley. Special Publication No. 2, Reprinted from Arctic, Vol. 7, Nos. 3 and 4, Pp. 113-366. Montreal: Arctic Institute." *Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science* 23(2): 272-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/138694.

Farina, A. 2014. *Soundscape Ecology: Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications*. Dordrecht: Netherlands Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7374-5.

Forêt, M., P. Barbier, R. Tremblay, T. Meziane, U. Neumeier, E. Duvieilbourg, and F. Olivier. 2018. "Trophic Cues Promote Secondary Migrations of Bivalve Recruits in a Highly Dynamic Temperate Intertidal System." *Ecosphere* 9(12): e02510-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2510.

Fraschetti, S., A. Giangrande, A. Terlizzi, and F. Boero. 2003. "Pre-and Post-Settlement Events in Benthic Community Dynamics." *Oceanologica Acta* 25(6): 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(02)01194-5.

Fuchs, H. L., G. P. Gerbi, E. J. Hunter, and A. J. Christman. 2018. "Waves Cue Distinct Behaviors and Differentiate Transport of Congeneric Snail Larvae from Sheltered Versus Wavy Habitats." *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America* 115(32): e7532-e7540. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804558115.

Garcia, E. G., G. G. Thorarinsdottir, and S. A. Ragnarsson. 2003. "Settlement of Bivalve Spat on Artificial Collectors in Eyjafjordur, North Iceland." *Hydrobiologia* 503(1-3): 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:hydr.0000008495.24479.4f.

Garwood, J. C., R. C. Musgrave, and A. J. Lucas. 2020. "Life in Internal Waves." *Oceanography* 33(3): 38-49. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.313.

Gigot, M., F. Olivier, G. Cervello, R. Tremblay, D. Mathias, T. Meziane, L. Chauvaud, and J. Bonnel. 2023. "Pile Driving and Drilling Underwater Sounds Impact the Metamorphosis Dynamics of *Pecten maximus* (L., 1758) Larvae." *Marine Pollution Bulletin* 191(June): 114969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114969.

Gigot, M., R. Tremblay, J. Bonnel, L. Chauvaud, and F. Olivier. 2023. "Physiological Condition of the Warty Venus (Venus Verrucosa L. 1758) Larvae Modulates Response to Pile Driving and Drilling Underwater Sounds." *Frontiers in Marine Science* 10: 1117431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1117431.

Gigot, M., R. Tremblay, J. Bonnel, D. Mathias, T. Meziane, L. Chauvaud, and F. Olivier. 2024. "Noise Pollution Causes Parental Stress on Marine Invertebrates, the Giant Scallop Example." *Marine Pollution Bulletin* 203(June): 116454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116454.

Gosselin, L. A., and P. Y. Qian. 1997. "Juvenile Mortality in Benthic Marine Invertebrates." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 146: 265-282. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps146265.

Günther, C. P. 1992. "Dispersal of Intertidal Invertebrates: A Strategy to React to Disturbance of Different Scales?" *Netherlands Journal of Sea Research* 30: 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(92)90044-F.

Hadfield, M., and V. Paul. 2001. "Natural Chemical Cues for Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine-Invertebrate Larvae." In *Marine Chemical Ecology*, edited by J. B. McClintock and B. J. Baker, 413-431. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036602.ch13.

Halliday, W. D., D. Barclay, A. N. Barkley, E. Cook, J. Dawson, R. C. Hilliard, N. E. Hussey, et al. 2021. "Underwater Sound Levels in the Canadian Arctic, 2014-2019." *Marine Pollution Bulletin* 168 (July): 112437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112437.

Halpern, B. S., M. Frazier, J. Afflerbach, J. S. Lowndes, F. Micheli, C. O'Hara, C. Scarborough, and K. A. Selkoe. 2019. "Recent Pace of Change in Human Impact on the World's Ocean." *Scientific Reports* 9(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9.

Hawkins, A. D., and A. N. Popper. 2017. "A Sound Approach to Assessing the Impact of Underwater Noise on Marine Fishes and Invertebrates." *ICES Journal of Marine Science* 74(3): 635-651. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw205.

Hayward, P. J., and J. S. Ryland. 2017. *Handbook of the Marine Fauna of North-West Europe*. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549443.001.0001.

Hunt, H. L., and R. E. Scheibling. 1997. "Role of Early Post-Settlement Mortality in Recruitment of Benthic Marine Invertebrates." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 155: 269-301. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps155269.

Institut d'Émission des Départements d'Outre-Mer (IEDOM). 2022. "Rapport Annuel Économique 2022." https://www.iedom.fr/Rapport-annuel-2022-de-Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon.

Jerem, P., and F. Mathews. 2020. "Trends and Knowledge Gaps in Field Research Investigating Effects of Anthropogenic Noise." *Conservation Biology* 35(1): 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13510.

Jézéquel, Y., S. Cones, F. H. Jensen, H. Brewer, J. Collins, and T. A. Mooney. 2022. "Pile Driving Repeatedly Impacts the Giant Scallop (*Placopecten magellanicus*)." *Scientific Reports* 12(1): 15380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19838-6.

Jolivet, A., R. Tremblay, F. Olivier, C. Gervaise, R. Sonier, B. Genard, and L. Chauvaud. 2016. "Validation of Trophic and Anthropic Underwater Noise as Settlement Trigger in Blue Mussels." *Scientific Reports* 6(1): 33829. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33829.

Kelly, J. R., and R. E. Scheibling. 2012. "Fatty Acids as Dietary Tracers in Benthic Food Webs." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 446(February): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09559.

Keough, M. J., and B. J. Downes. 1982. "Recruitment of Marine Invertebrates: The Role of Active Larval Choices and Early Mortality." *Oecologia* 54(3): 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380003.

Khalaman, V. V. 2005. "Testing the Hypothesis of Tolerance Strategies in *Hiatella arctica* L. (Mollusca: Bivalvia)." *Helgoland Marine Research* 59(3): 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-005-0218-6.

Kingsford, M. J., J. M. Leis, A. Shanks, K. C. Lindeman, S. G. Morgan, and J. Pineda. 2002. "Sensory Environments, Larval Abilities and Local Self-Recruitment." *Bulletin of Marine Science* 70(1): 309-340.
Kunc, H. P., K. E. McLaughlin, and R. Schmidt. 2016. "Aquatic Noise Pollution: Implications for Individuals, Populations, and Ecosystems." *Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences* 283(1836): 20160839. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0839.

Lagarde, F., M. Richard, B. Bec, C. Roques, S. Mortreux, I. Bernard, C. Chiantella, et al. 2018. "Trophic Environments Influence Size at Metamorphosis and Recruitment Performance of Pacific Oysters." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 602: 135-153. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12666.

Lazure, P., B. Le Cann, and M. Bezaud. 2018. "Large Diurnal Bottom Temperature Oscillations around the Saint Pierre and Miquelon Archipelago." *Scientific Reports* 8(1): 13882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31857-w.

Le Corre, N., A. L. Martel, F. Guichard, and L. E. Johnson. 2013. "Variation in Recruitment: Differentiating the Roles of Primary and Secondary Settlement of Blue Mussels *Mytilus* spp." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 481: 133-146. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10216.

Leal, I., R. Tremblay, and A. A. V. Flores. 2022. "Allochthonous Subsidies Drive Early Recruitment of a Subtropical Foundation Species." *Oikos* 2022(7): e08991. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08991.

Lillis, A., D. W. R. Bohnenstiehl, and D. B. Eggleston. 2015. "Soundscape Manipulation Enhances Larval Recruitment of a Reef-Building Mollusk." *PeerJ* 2015(June): e999. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.999.

Lillis, A., D. B. Eggleston, and D. R. Bohnenstiehl. 2013. "Oyster Larvae Settle in Response to Habitat-Associated Underwater Sounds." *PLoS One* 8(10): e21-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079337.

Lutz, R. A., J. D. Goodwin, B. S. Baldwin, G. Burnell, M. Castagna, S. Chapman, A. Chestnut, et al. 2018. "Scanning Electron Microscopic Aids for Identification of Larval and Post-Larval Bivalves." *Journal of Shellfish Research* 37(2): 247-448. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.037.0202.

Martel, A., and F. S. Chia. 1991. "Oviposition, Larval Abundance, In Situ Larval Growth and Recruitment of the Herbivorous Gastropod *Lacuna vincita* in Kelp Canopies in Barkley Sound, Vancouver Island (British Columbia)." *Marine Biology* 110(2): 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313709.

Martel, A., and T. Diefenbach. 1993. "Effects of Body Size, Water Current and Microhabitat on Mucous-Thread Drifting in Post-Metamorphic Gastropods *Lacuna* spp." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 99(3): 215-220. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps099215.

Martel, A., R. Tremblay, N. Toupoint, F. Olivier, and B. Myrand. 2014. "Veliger Size at Metamorphosis and Temporal Variability in Prodissoconch II Morphometry in the Blue Mussel (*Mytilus edulis*): Potential Impact on Recruitment." *Journal of Shellfish Research* 33(2): 443-455. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.033.0213.

Mathias, D., C. Gervaise, and L. Di Iorio. 2016. "Wind Dependence of Ambient Noise in a Biologically Rich Coastal Area." *The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America* 139(2): 839-850. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4941917.

Merchant, N. D., R. L. Putland, M. André, E. Baudin, M. Felli, H. Slabbekoorn, and R. Dekeling. 2022. "A Decade of Underwater Noise Research in Support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive." *Ocean and Coastal Management* 228 (September): 106299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106299.

Meziane, T., S. Y. Lee, P. L. Mfilinge, P. K. S. Shin, M. H. W. Lam, and M. Tsuchiya. 2007. "Inter-Specific and Geographical Variations in the Fatty Acid Composition of Mangrove Leaves: Implications for Using Fatty Acids as a Taxonomic Tool and Tracers of Organic Matter." *Marine Biology* 150(6): 1103-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0424-z.

Morello, S. L., and P. O. Yund. 2016. "Response of Competent Blue Mussel (*Mytilus edulis*) Larvae to Positive and Negative Settlement Cues." *Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology* 480 (April): 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.019.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2018. "2018 Revision to: Technical Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0): Underwater Thresholds for Onset of Permanent Threshold Shifts." U.S. Dept. of Commer., NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-59. 167 p.

National Research Council (NRC). 2003. *Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals*. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

O'Connor, N. E., J. H. Grabowski, L. M. Ladwig, and J. F. Bruno. 2008. "Simulated Predator Extinctions: Predator Identity Affects Survival and Recruitment of Oysters." *Ecology* 89(2): 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-2029.1.

Olivier, F., M. Gigot, D. Mathias, Y. Jezequel, T. Meziane, C. L'Her, L. Chauvaud, and J. Bonnel. 2023. "Assessing the Impacts of Anthropogenic Sounds on Early Stages of Benthic Invertebrates: The 'Larvosonic System'." *Limnology and Oceanography: Methods* 21(2): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10527.

Pechenik, J. A. 1990. "Delayed Metamorphosis by Larvae of Benthic Marine Invertebrates: Does It Occur? Is There a Price to Pay?" *Ophecia* 32(1-2): 63-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785236.1990.10422025.

Pechenik, J. A. 2006. "Larval Experience and Latent Effects – Metamorphosis Is Not a New Beginning." *Integrative and Comparative Biology* 46(3): 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icj028.

Perillo, A., L. G. Mazzoni, L. F. Passos, V. D. L. R. Goulart, C. Duca, and R. J. Young. 2017. "Anthropogenic Noise Reduces Bird Species Richness and Diversity in Urban Parks." *Ibis* 159(3): 638-646. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12481.

Pernet, F., R. Tremblay, and E. Bourget. 2003. "Settlement Success, Spatial Pattern and Behavior of Mussel Larvae *Mytilus* spp. in Experimental 'Downwelling' Systems of Varying Velocity and Turbulence." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 260: 125-140. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps260125.

Podolsky, R. D., and A. L. Moran. 2006. "Integrating Function across Marine Life Cycles." *Integrative and Comparative Biology* 46(5): 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icl026.

Poitevin, P., L. Chauvaud, C. Pécheyran, P. Lazure, A. Jolivet, and J. Thébault. 2020. "Does Trace Element Composition of Bivalve Shells Record Ultra-High Frequency Environmental Variations?" *Marine Environmental Research* 158(June): 104943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104943.

Popper, A. N., A. D. Hawkins, R. R. Fay, D. A. Mann, S. Bartol, T. J. Carlson, S. Coombs, et al. 2014. *Sound Exposure Guidelines for Fishes and Sea Turtles: A Technical Report Prepared by ANSI-Accredited Standards Committee S3/SC1 and Registered with ANSI*. Springer Briefs in Oceanography. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06659-2.

Proppe, D. S., C. B. Sturdy, and C. C. St. Clair. 2013. "Anthropogenic Noise Decreases Urban Songbird Diversity and May
Contribute to Homogenization.” *Global Change Biology* 19(4): 1075-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12098.

Roberts, L., S. Cheesman, T. Breithaupt, and M. Elliott. 2015. "Sensitivity of the Mussel *Mytilus edulis* to Substrate-Borne Vibration in Relation to Anthropogenically Generated Noise." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 538(October): 185-195. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11468.

Robson, A. A., L. Chauvaud, R. P. Wilson, and L. G. Halsey. 2012. "Small Actions, Big Costs: The Behavioural Energetics of a Commercially Important Invertebrate." *Journal of the Royal Society Interface* 9(72): 1486-98. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0713.

Seed, R., C. A. Richardson, and K. Smith. 2000. "Marine Mussels their Evolutionary Success Ecological Significance and Use as Chronometers of Environmental Change." *Geological Society Special Publication* 177(1): 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.177.01.32.

Slabbekoorn, H., N. Bouton, I. van Opzeeland, A. Coers, C. ten Cate, and A. N. Popper. 2010. "A Noisy Spring: The Impact of Globally Rising Underwater Sound Levels on Fish." *Trends in Ecology & Evolution* 25(7): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005.

Solé, M., J. M. Fortuño, M. van der Schaar, and M. André. 2021. "An Acoustic Treatment to Mitigate the Effects of the Apple Snail on Agriculture and Natural Ecosystems." *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering* 9(9): 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090969.

Solé, M., K. Kaifu, T. A. Mooney, S. L. Nedelec, F. Olivier, A. N. Radford, M. Vazzana, et al. 2023. "Marine Invertebrates and Noise." *Frontiers in Marine Science* 10(March): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1129057.

Sordello, R., O. Ratel, F. de Flamerie Lachapelle, C. Leger, A. Dambry, and S. Vanpeene. 2020. "Evidence of the Impact of Noise Pollution on Biodiversity: A Systematic Map." *Environmental Evidence* 9(1): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00202-y.

Spicer, I. J. 2014. "What Can an Ecophysiological Approach Tell us about the Physiological Responses of Marine Invertebrates to Hypoxia?" *Journal of Experimental Biology* 217(1): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.090365.

Stocks, J. R., A. Broad, C. Radford, T. E. Minchinton, and A. R. Davis. 2012. "Response of Marine Invertebrate Larvae to Natural and Anthropogenic Sound: A Pilot Study." *The Open Marine Biology Journal* 6(1): 57-61. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874450801206010057.

Svavarsson, J., H. D. Guls, R. C. Sham, K. M. Y. Leung, and H. P. Halldórsson. 2021. "Pollutants from Shipping - New Environmental Challenges in the Subarctic and the Arctic Ocean." *Marine Pollution Bulletin* 164(March): 112004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112004.

Thorson, G. 1950. "Reproductive and Larval Ecology of Marine Botom Invertebrates." *Biological Reviews* 25(1): 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1950.tb00585.x.

Toupoint, N., L. Gilmore-Solomon, F. Bourque, B. Myrand, F. Pernet, F. Olivier, and R. Tremblay. 2012. "Match/Mismatch between the *Mytilus edulis* Larval Supply and Seston Quality: Effect on Recruitment." *Ecology* 93(8): 1922-34. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1292.1.

Toupoint, N., V. Mohit, I. Linossier, N. Bourgougnon, B. Myrand, F. Olivier, C. Lovejoy, and R. Tremblay. 2012. "Effect of Biofilm Age on Settlement of *Mytilus edulis*." *Biofouling* 28(9): 985-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2012.725202.

Tremblay, G., C. Belzile, M. Gosselin, M. Poulin, S. Roy, and J. É. Tremblay. 2009. "Late Summer Phytoplankton Distribution along a 3500 Km Transect in Canadian Arctic Waters: Strong Numerical Dominance by Picoeukaryotes." *Aquatic Microbial Ecology* 54(1): 55-70. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01257.

Tremblay, R., G. Christophersen, J. B. Nadalini, I. Redjah, T. Magnesen, and S. Andersen. 2020. "Improving Scallop (*Pecten maximus* and *Placopecten magellanicus*) Spat Production by Initial Larvae Size and Hydrodynamic Cues Used in Nursery System." *Aquaculture* 516(November): 734650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734650.

Tremblay, R., B. Myrand, and H. Guderley. 1998. "Thermal Sensitivity of Organismal and Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption in Relation to Susceptibility of Blue Mussels, *Mytilus edulis*, to Summer Mortality." *Journal of Shellfish Research* 17(1): 141-152.

Trowbridge, C. M., and J. D. Litzgus. 2022. "Wind Farms Alter Amphibian Community Diversity and Chorusing Behavior." *Herpetologica* 78(2): 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-21-00032.

Veillard, D., S. Beaucercq, N. Ghafari, A. A. Arnold, B. Genard, L. Sleno, F. Olivier, et al. 2025. "Molecular Evidence of Shipping Noise Impact on the Blue Mussel, a Key Species for the Sustainability of Coastal Marine Environments." *Marine Ecology Progress Series* 759: 35-50. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14830.

Veillard, D., R. Tremblay, M. K. Sejr, L. Chauvaud, E. Cam, and F. Olivier. 2023. "Recruitment Dynamics of *Hiatella arctica* within a High Arctic Site (Young Sound Fjord, NE Greenland)." *Polar Biology* 46(12): 1275-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-023-03201-0.

Wilkens, S. L., J. A. Stanley, and A. G. Jeffs. 2012. "Induction of Settlement in Mussel (Perna Canaliculus) Larvae by Vessel Noise." *Biofouling* 28(1): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2011.651717.

Williams, B. R., D. McAfee, and S. D. Connell. 2022. "Oyster Larvae Swim along Gradients of Sound." *Journal of Applied Ecology* 59(7): 1815-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14188.

Woodson, C. B. 2018. "The Fate and Impact of Internal Waves in Nearshore Ecosystems." *Annual Review of Marine Science* 10(1): 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-121916-063619.

Zhadan, P. M. 2005. "Directional Sensitivity of the Japanese Scallop Mizuhopecten Yessoensis and Swift Scallop Chlamys Swifti to Water-Borne Vibrations." *Russian Journal of Marine Biology* 31(1): 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11179-005-0040-7.

## SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

**How to cite this article:** Byrro Gauthier, Nathália, Thomas Uboldi, Frédéric Olivier, Réjean Tremblay, Laurent Chauvaud, Delphine Mathias, Pascal Lazure, et al. 2025. "Should I Stay, or Should I Go: Anthropogenic Noises Disrupt Early Recruitment of Subarctic Invertebrates." *Ecological Applications* 35(7): e70119. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70119