<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

HAL
open science

# A long life of excess: The interacting transient SN 2017hcc

S. Moran, M. Fraser, R. Kotak, A. Pastorello, S. Benetti, S.J. Brennan, C.P.

Gutiérrez, E. Kankare, H. Kuncarayakti, S. Mattila, et al.

► To cite this version:

S. Moran, M. Fraser, R. Kotak, A. Pastorello, S. Benetti, et al. A long life of excess: The interacting transient SN 2017hcc. Astronomy and Astrophysics - A&A, 2023, 669, pp.A51. 10.1051/0004-6361/202244565. hal-03862333

HAL Id: hal-03862333

https://hal.science/hal-03862333

Submitted on 10 Nov 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
# A long life of excess: The interacting transient SN 2017hcc

S. Moran<fnref n="1" />, M. Fraser<fnref n="2" />, R. Kotak<fnref n="1" />, A. Pastorello<fnref n="3" />, S. Benetti<fnref n="3" />, S. J. Brennan<fnref n="2" />, C. P. Gutiérrez<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="4" />, E. Kankare<fnref n="1" />,
H. Kuncarayakti <fnref n="1" />, S. Mattila<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="5" />, T. M. Reynolds<fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="6" />,<fnref n="7" />, J. P. Anderson<fnref n="8" />, P. J. Brown<fnref n="9" />, S. Campana<fnref n="10" />,
K. C. Chambers<fnref n="11" />, T.-W. Chen<fnref n="12" />, M. Della Valle<fnref n="13" />,<fnref n="14" />,<fnref n="15" />, M. Dennefeld<fnref n="16" />, N. Elias-Rosa<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="17" />, L. Galbany<fnref n="17" />,<fnref n="18" />,
F. J. Galindo-Guil<fnref n="19" />, M. Gromadzki<fnref n="20" />, D. Hiramatsu<fnref n="21" />,<fnref n="22" />,<fnref n="23" />, C. Inserra<fnref n="24" />, G. Leloudas<fnref n="25" />,
T. E. Müller-Bravo<fnref n="17" />, M. Nicholl<fnref n="26" />, A. Reguitti<fnref n="27" />,<fnref n="28" />,<fnref n="3" />, M. Shahbandeh<fnref n="29" />, S. J. Smartt<fnref n="30" />,
L. Tartaglia<fnref n="3" />, and D. R. Young<fnref n="30" />

Received 21 July 2022 / Accepted 22 October 2022

## ABSTRACT

In this study we present the results of a five-year follow-up campaign of the long-lived type IIn supernova SN 2017hcc, found in a spiral dwarf host of near-solar metallicity. The long rise time (57 ± 2 days, ATLAS o band) and high luminosity (peaking at -20.78 ± 0.01 mag in the ATLAS o band) point towards an interaction of massive ejecta with massive and dense circumstellar material (CSM). The evolution of SN 2017hcc is slow, both spectroscopically and photometrically, reminiscent of the long-lived type IIn, SN 2010jl. An infrared (IR) excess was apparent soon after the peak, and blueshifts were noticeable in the Balmer lines starting from a few hundred days, but appeared to be fading by around +1200 d. We posit that an IR light echo from pre-existing dust dominates at early times, with some possible condensation of new dust grains occurring at epochs $\ge$+800 d.

**Key words.** supernovae: general – supernovae: individual: SN 2017hcc – supernovae: individual: ATLAS17lsn – supernovae: individual: PS17fra

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Vesiilinnantie 5, 20500 Finland
e-mail: semoke@utu.fi</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO (FINCA), University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Diogenes Street, Engomi, 1516 Nicosia, Cyprus</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ Cosmic Dawn Center, DTU Space, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷ Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 København N, Denmark</footnote>

<footnote n="8">⁸ European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova, 3107 Casilla 19, Santiago, Chile</footnote>

<footnote n="9">⁹ George P. and Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics & Astronomy, Texas A. & M. University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 4242 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="10">¹⁰ INAF – Osservatorio astronomico di Brera, Via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="11">¹¹ Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="12">¹² The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden</footnote>

<footnote n="13">¹³ INAF – Capodimonte Astronomical Observatory, Salita Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="14">¹⁴ INFN – Napoli, Strada Comunale Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="15">¹⁵ ICRANet, Piazza della Repubblica 10, 65122 Pescara, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="16">¹⁶ Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (IAP), CNRS & Sorbonne Université, 75014 Paris, France</footnote>

<footnote n="17">¹⁷ Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans s/n, 08193 Barcelona, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="18">¹⁸ Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="19">¹⁹ Centro de Estudios de Física del Cosmos de Aragón (CEFCA), Plaza San Juan 1, 44001 Teruel, Spain</footnote>

<footnote n="20">²⁰ Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warszawa, Poland</footnote>

<footnote n="21">²¹ Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-1516, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="22">²² Las Cumbres Observatory, 6740 Cortona Drive, Suite 102, Goleta, CA 93117-5575, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="23">²³ Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="24">²⁴ School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="25">²⁵ DTU Space, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark</footnote>

<footnote n="26">²⁶ Birmingham Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="27">²⁷ Instituto de Astrofísica, Departamento de Ciencias Físicas – Universidad Andres Bello, Avda. República 252, 8320000 Santiago, Chile</footnote>

<footnote n="28">²⁸ Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Nuncio Monsenor Sótero Sanz 100, Providencia 8320000, Santiago, Chile</footnote>

<footnote n="29">²⁹ Department of Physics, Florida State University, 77 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="30">³⁰ Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Maths and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK</footnote>
# 1. Introduction

Supernovae (SNe) are traditionally grouped into two types: type I (hydrogen-poor) and type II (hydrogen-rich; Minkowski 1941). There are subdivisions within both of these classes of SNe based on criteria such as spectral lines and light curve behaviour (Gal-Yam 2017). The type IIn designation was first introduced by Schlegel (1990) to describe SNe with narrow ($FWHM \le 1000 \text{ km s}^{-1}$) hydrogen emission lines in their spectra. These narrow lines arise from dense circumstellar material ionised by an ongoing shock interaction (e.g., Chugai 1997). Most SNe IIn are expected to have progenitor stars with a high mass loss rate, providing the necessary circumstellar material (CSM) for later shock interactions post-explosion, and they have often been associated with luminous blue variable-like (LBV-like) stars (Kiewe et al. 2012; Smith 2017).

Type IIn SNe are relatively rare, constituting about 9% of all core-collapse SNe in the local Universe (Li et al. 2011; Cappellaro et al. 2015); however, these estimates are uncertain, with Eldridge et al. (2013) finding a much lower rate of 2.4%, for example. Type IIn SNe show tremendous diversity in their light curves and spectra (e.g., Kiewe et al. 2012; Nyholm et al. 2020; Fraser 2020); this diversity likely reflects a large spread of CSM masses and density profiles, geometric configurations, wind velocities, chemical compositions, as well as properties of the progenitors and their environments. Some of the most extreme exemplars are characterised by long-lasting, slowly evolving light curves. SN 2010jl is an archetypal long-lived type IIn event, reaching an absolute magnitude of ~−19.9 mag in the V band and remaining bright for several years (Stoll et al. 2011; Ofek et al. 2019).

In this study we report on the long-lived, slowly evolving type IIn SN 2017hcc. As previously mentioned, SNe IIn are a heterogeneous group, so photometry and spectroscopy covering key epochs are a pre-requisite to deciphering the pre-explosion history of the progenitor. We present results from a comprehensive ultraviolet (UV) to mid-infrared (MIR) follow-up campaign conducted over a five year period.

SN 2017hcc was discovered in the course of the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) survey (Tonry et al. 2018; Smith et al. 2020) on 2017 Oct. 2 (internal survey designation ATLAS17lsn, Tonry et al. 2017), and was classified by the All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN, Shappee et al. 2014; Kochanek et al. 2017) as a type IIn SN (Dong et al. 2017). The SN is located at $\alpha = 00^{\circ}03^{\prime}50^{\prime\prime}.58$, $\delta = -11^{\circ}28^{\prime}28^{\prime\prime}.78$ J2000 (see Fig. 1).

A number of surveys independently discovered SN 2017hcc. The Gaia Science Alerts (Hodgkin et al. 2021) project designated it Gaia17dcj; the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS1; Huber et al. 2015) project called it PS17fra; and the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF; Bellm et al. 2019) called it ZTF18abtmgfn.

Based on the measured wavelength of $H\alpha$ in the +88 d Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) + ALFOSC gr17 spectrum, we adopted a heliocentric redshift of $z = 0.0168 \pm 0.0001$ for SN 2017hcc, which is in line with the measurement obtained by Prieto et al. (2017). For a Hubble parameter of $70 \text{ km s}^{-1} \text{ Mpc}^{-1}$, taken as a compromise between inconsistent measured values (Freedman et al. 2019; Di Valentino et al. 2021), we calculated the luminosity distance to be $72.9 \pm 0.4 \text{ Mpc}$ and the distance modulus to be $\mu = 34.31 \pm 0.01$ mag. Unfortunately, there was no progenitor candidate observed for SN 2017hcc due to its distance. The explosion epoch has been set as MJD 58027.4 (2017 Oct. 1 09:36:00 UTC, Sect. 3).

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1.** SN 2017hcc ($\alpha = 00^{\circ}03^{\prime}50^{\prime\prime}.58$, $\delta = -11^{\circ}28^{\prime}28^{\prime\prime}.78$ J2000), based on a V band image taken with NOT+ALFOSC on 2018 Sept. 30 (+365 d). The inset shows the region around the SN in more detail, with the faint nucleus of the host just visible to the west of the SN.</figcaption></figure>

All phases reported in this paper are with respect to this date.

We take the foreground extinction towards SN 2017hcc to be $A_V = 0.091$ mag from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011, via the NASA Extragalactic Database, NED<fnref n="1" />), assuming an $R_V$ of 3.1 (Schultz & Wiemer 1975). The host galaxy of SN 2017hcc appears to be a dwarf spiral (Fig. 1). It has an apparent magnitude of $r_{Kron} = 17.8$ mag in the Pan-STARRS1 survey. For a distance of 72.9 Mpc, this implies an absolute magnitude of −16.6 mag, taking Milky Way extinction into account, which is suggestive of a low mass host (Pskovskii 1965).

The equivalent width of narrow sodium lines has frequently been used as a proxy for extinction (e.g., Poznanski et al. 2012). Whilst there are several concerns regarding the reliability of such methods (e.g., Poznanski et al. 2011), in the case of SN 2017hcc the presence of any significant sodium absorption in any of our spectra is unclear, which is at least qualitatively consistent with very little dust in the host line of sight. This is corroborated by Smith & Andrews (2020), who inferred an upper limit of $E(B-V) = 0.016$ for the host extinction using echelle spectra. Additionally, the spectra of SN 2017hcc are quite blue when compared to other type IIn SNe, which gives a further indication of low extinction. As such, we regard extinction in the host galaxy to be negligible.

The paper is organised as follows: in Sect. 2, we discuss the observational data acquisition and reduction. These data comprise ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared (NIR) imaging along with optical and NIR spectroscopy. The photometric and spectroscopic evolution is outlined in Sects. 3 and 4, respectively. In Sect. 5 we describe the calculation of the metallicity of the environment. Section 6 contains a summary and our conclusions. All photometric data and logs of the optical and NIR spectroscopy are listed in tables in the appendix. We note that, alongside the previous works by Prieto et al. (2017), Kumar et al. (2019), and Smith & Andrews (2020), a detailed study by Chandra et al. (2022) concentrating on the X-ray, radio, and infrared (IR)

<footnote n="1">¹ http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/</footnote>
properties of SN 2017hcc was posted to the arXiv preprint server
whilst this work was under review.

**2. Data acquisition and reduction**

**2.1. Optical imaging**

We have made use of optical imaging data from a number of tele-
scopes and instruments for SN 2017hcc: the Las Cumbres Obser-
vatory (LCO) network of 1 m telescopes, the NOT + ALFOSC,
the Liverpool Telescope + IO:O, the 0.9 m Asiago Schmidt tele-
scope + KAF-16803 CCD. We make use of observations taken
in Sloan *ugriz* filters, as well as Johnson-Cousins *B* and *V*. In
addition, photometry was obtained as part of routine operations
of the ATLAS, Pan-STARRS1, and ASAS-SN surveys and the
Gaia Alerts project. The Pan-STARRS1 imaging was taken in
the *w* and *i* filters, whilst for ATLAS cyan (*c*) and orange (*o*)
filters were used, where *c* is comparable to *g* + *r* whilst *o* is com-
parable to *r* + *i*. All Gaia photometry was taken in the Gaia *G*
filter, a wide band filter that covers approximately *g* + *r* + *i*. The
ASAS-SN photometry was taken in the *V* and *g* filters. Though
there is ZTF photometry available for SN 2017hcc, we have
not made use of it, since a template issue rendered the results
unreliable.

We reduced all optical images in a similar fashion. The images were bias and overscan subtracted before being flat-fielded and trimmed. For the NOT+ALFOSC images, which were largely obtained via the NUTS and NUTS2 programmes<fnref n="2" />, and the Asiago images, we performed these steps with dedicated FOSCGUI pipelines<fnref n="3" /> for data reduction developed by E. Cappellaro. The data from the Liverpool Telescope were reduced automatically by the IO:O pipeline<fnref n="4" />, whilst the LCO data were reduced automatically by the BANZAI pipeline<fnref n="5" />. The ATLAS, ASAS-SN, and Pan-STARRS1 data were reduced automatically by their respective pipelines (Smith et al. 2020; Kochanek et al. 2017; Magnier et al. 2020) with Point-Spread Function (PSF) fitting being used to obtain photometry.

From the start of the third observing season (≥+600 d), the
increasing contribution of the host galaxy became apparent.
Since SN 2017hcc was still visible in our final observations, we
were unable to obtain fresh SN-free template images in order
to perform difference imaging, though shallow Pan-STARRS1
templates did exist for the field. As a result of this limitation, we
used the AUTOPHOT<fnref n="6" /> code (Brennan & Fraser 2022) to measure
the brightness of SN 2017hcc with PSF-fitting photometry.

We calibrated the zeropoints for the *B* and *V* bands against
the APASS catalogue, whilst we calibrated those of the *g*, *r*, *i* and
*z* bands against the Pan-STARRS1 catalogue. Full details of all
optical photometric measurements determined with AUTOPHOT
are given in Table A.1.

**2.2. Ultraviolet and X-ray imaging**

SN 2017hcc was also observed by the UltraViolet Optical Tele-
scope (UVOT; Roming et al. 2005) on the Neil Gehrels Swift
Observatory. Swift/UVOT data have been previously published
by Prieto et al. (2017) and Kumar et al. (2019). We use pho-
tometry created by the pipeline for the Swift Optical Ultraviolet
Supernova Archive (SOUSA; Brown et al. 2014), updated with

the zeropoints of Breeveld et al. (2010) and the updated sensitiv-
ity correction from CALDB 20200925. We did not perform host
galaxy template subtraction. Full details of all Swift photometric
measurements are given in Table A.2.

Together with UVOT, Swift has a co-pointing X-ray instru-
ment: the X-Ray Telescope (XRT, Burrows et al. 2005). We
summed the 13 observations taken during the first 45 days,
ending with 28.6ks of observing time. We do not detect any
source at the location of SN 2017hcc. The 3σ upper limit on the
0.3–10 keV count rate is 8.4 × 10⁻<fnref n="4" /> c s⁻¹. Assuming a power law
spectral model with a photon index Γ = 2 and a Galactic col-
umn density of 2.9 × 10²⁰ cm⁻<fnref n="2" /> (Willingale et al. 2013), one can
translate this into an upper limit on the 0.3–10 keV unabsorbed
flux of <3.7 × 10⁻¹⁴ erg cm⁻<fnref n="2" /> s⁻¹, or on the X-ray luminosity of
<2.5 × 10⁴⁰ erg s⁻¹.

**2.3. Infrared imaging**

We used NOT+NOTCam, as part of the NUTS and NUTS2
programmes, and the New Technology Telescope (NTT) with
the SOFI instrument for NIR imaging of SN 2017hcc, as part
of the ePESSTO programme<fnref n="7" /> (Smartt et al. 2015). We used
the NOTCam QUICKLOOK<fnref n="8" /> v2.5 reduction package, which
is a set of IRAF scripts, with a few functional modifications
(e.g., to increase the FOV of the reduced image), to reduce the
NOTCam images. Bright and faint sky flats were taken and these
were used to create a differential master flat. The flats were
checked to make sure the count levels were linear. We masked
out bad pixels (cold, hot, zero) during reduction and we used
a model to account for the significant optical distortion of the
NOTCam wide-field camera. We accounted for the dark current
through the use of differential flats in the reduction process.

For SOFI reductions, we used the PESSTO PIPELINE<fnref n="9" />
(Smartt et al. 2015). The raw frames were corrected for array
crosstalk, and a sky image was created which was subtracted
from the individual frames. The frames were flat-fielded with
differential dome flats created by taking flats with the dome lamp
on and off. An illumination correction was applied to account for
the difference between sky and dome illumination patterns. The
pipeline uses SExtractor to detect objects in the dithered images.
The dithered images are aligned and combined using IRAF tasks
based on a transformation between corresponding objects in the
images.

As in the case of the optical bands, we used the AUTOPHOT
code to measure the brightness of SN 2017hcc in NIR bands with
PSF-fitting photometry. The zero points were calculated using
the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) catalogue<fnref n="10" />. As the
2MASS catalogue does not have *Ks* band photometry, we used
the *K* band measurements of the catalogue as a substitute. Full
details of all NIR photometric measurements determined with
AUTOPHOT are given in Table A.3.

The W1 (3.4 µm) and W2 (4.6 µm) NEOWISE (Mainzer et al. 2011, 2014) photometry was taken from the public NEOWISE-R Single Exposure (L1b) Source Table<fnref n="11" /> and can be found in Table A.4. We adopted the median value of the individual measurements at each observing visit as the magnitude after

<footnote n="2">² https://nuts.sn.ie/</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ https://sngroup.oapd.inaf.it/foscgui.html</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ https://telescope.livjm.ac.uk/TelInst/Pipelines/#ioo</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ https://github.com/LCOGT/banzai</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ https://github.com/Astro-Sean/autophot</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷ https://www.pessto.org/</footnote>

<footnote n="8">⁸ http://www.not.iac.es/instruments/notcam/guide/
observe.html</footnote>

<footnote n="9">⁹ https://github.com/svalenti/pessto</footnote>

<footnote n="10">¹⁰ https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/2mass.html</footnote>

<footnote n="11">¹¹ https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/Gator/
nph-scan?mission=irsa&submit=Select&projshort=WISE</footnote>
removing data flagged as poor quality, or separated by more
than 2" from the SN location. For the uncertainty, we adopted
the standard error of mean of the individual measurements after
3 sigma-clipping outliers, with an additional uncertainty associ-
ated with the photometric calibration added in quadrature. We
also include three epochs (393, 566, and 768 d) of *Spitzer* imag-
ing at 3.6 µm and 4.5 µm in our analysis, adopting the photomet-
ric measurements of Szalai et al. (2021).

## 2.4. Optical spectroscopy

The bulk of the spectra were taken at the NOT using the ALFOSC instrument (23 out of the total of 52) as part of the NUTS and NUTS2 programmes, and at the NTT with the EFOSC2 instrument (13 of 52) as part of the ePESSTO and ePESSTO+ programmes. Four spectra were taken at the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) with the DOLORES instrument and two were taken at the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) with the OSIRIS instrument. One was taken at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) using the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) instrument. Two using the FLOYDS instrument at the FTS telescope as part of the LCO network of telescopes. One at the Asiago 1.82 m telescope using the AFOSC instrument and five using the Asiago 1.22 m and the B&C instrument. The complete log of optical spectral observations can be found in Table A.5.

We reduced the NTT+EFOSC2 spectra using the PESSTO PIPELINE (Smartt et al. 2015). The raw two-dimensional spectra were overscan and bias subtracted, and divided by a normalised flat field before masking cosmic rays. The spectra were wavelength calibrated using an arc lamp to give the dispersion solution, together with an additional offset measured from bright sky emission lines in order to account for flexure within the instrument. Flux calibration was achieved using a master sensitivity function created from spectra of between three and seven spectro-photometric standard stars, observed at similar times to the science spectra. We combined gr11 and gr16 spectra taken on the same night into individual spectra using the scombine IRAF command.

We reduced the NOT+ALFOSC, GTC+OSIRIS and TNG+DOLORES spectra in an analogous fashion. For the NOT+ALFOSC spectra, with the exception of the sole gr17 spectrum, we performed the reductions using the FOSCGUI pipeline. In the case of the NOT+ALFOSC gr17 spectrum, the GTC+OSIRIS spectrum and the TNG+DOLORES spectra, we performed the reduction manually, using IRAF tasks. The DOLORES spectra have been shifted slightly (by a few Å) based on the position of the 6300.31 Å skyline. We extracted the spectrum from already processed data cube taken with the MUSE instrument on VLT as part of the All-weather MUse Supernova Integral-field of Nearby Galaxies (AMUSING; Galbany et al. 2016). The extraction was performed using the QFITSVIEW<fnref n="12" /> software package, by centring an annulus of radius one arc second on the location of SN 2017hcc. The FTS+FLOYDS spectra of which we make use were automatically reduced by the FLOYDS Pipeline<fnref n="13" />,<fnref n="14" /> at the LCO headquarters following the observation nights.

## 2.5. Infrared spectroscopy

Near-infrared spectra were taken with NTT+SOFI using an ABBA pattern of nodding along the slit. We reduced these data using the PESSTO PIPELINE (Smartt et al. 2015). The raw two-dimensional spectra were calibrated using an arc lamp and the frames were corrected for array crosstalk and flatfielded. Frames taken at position A were subtracted from those taken at position B (and vice-versa) to remove the varying sky background. Finally, the individual exposures were shifted and combined, before a one-dimensional spectrum was optimally extracted. A spectrum of a telluric standard was taken immediately after each science spectrum at a similar airmass, and this was used to correct for telluric absorption. The telluric standard was also used to achieve a flux calibration for each spectrum. We also obtained spectra from the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) using the SpeX instrument. These data were reduced using the IDL-based Spextool (Cushing et al. 2004) in an analogous fashion. The complete log of NIR spectral observations can be found in Table A.6.

# 3. Photometric evolution

## 3.1. Light curve and colour

SN 2017hcc is an extremely long-lived SN, characterised by a slowly evolving and luminous light curve (see Fig. 2). The region of the sky where the SN exploded had been well-monitored by the ATLAS survey in the period immediately prior to the discovery epoch. Taking a midpoint between the first detection (MJD 58028.4, 17.44 mag, ATLAS-*o*) and last non-detection (MJD 58 026.4, ATLAS-*o* > 19.04 mag)<fnref n="15" />, we estimate an explosion epoch of MJD 58027.4 ± 1.0 for SN 2017hcc. SN 2017hcc has a slow rise to maximum, as can be seen in Fig. 2. To determine the peak of the light curve, we fitted a third order polynomial to the ATLAS *o* band light curve. We found the *o* band maximum to be at MJD 58084.1 at absolute magnitude -20.78 ± 0.01 (apparent magnitude 13.53 ± 0.01), which gives a rise time of 57 ± 2 days.

After maximum, the light curve begins a slow decline in the optical bands. In contrast to the optical, the UV light curve of SN 2017hcc declines from the first epoch in UVW2, and only shows a very small rise in UVW1. In season two (~+230 to +460 d), the *H* and *Ks* light curves appear to flatten, with *Ks* perhaps even rising slightly and *J* band behaving more similarly to the optical bands. At late times, from the third season onwards (≥+600 d), a further flattening in the light curve becomes evident, with a slight decline of about 0.1 mag (100 d)⁻¹ in the *V* band. We note here that at these later times there may be a significant host contribution to the photometry, that we are unable to remove given the poor depth of the available templates. However, the flattening is also evident in the Gaia light curve which is expected to be largely unaffected by background contamination, and so we regard it as a real effect. The decline rate is much slower than that expected from the decay of radioactive ⁵⁶Co (0.98 mag (100 d)⁻¹, Miller et al. 2010), suggesting that circumstellar interaction remains the dominant mechanism powering the light curve.

<footnote n="12">¹² https://www.mpe.mpg.de/~ott/dpuser/qfitsview.html</footnote>

<footnote n="13">¹³ https://github.com/griffin-h/floyds_pipeine</footnote>

<footnote n="14">¹⁴ https://lco.global/documentation/data/floyds-pipeline/</footnote>

<footnote n="15">¹⁵ The limiting magnitude determined by forced photometry on ATLAS images at the SN location is slightly deeper in the ATLAS-*o* (>19.69 mag). We adopt the more conservative and shallower limit here, although either limit would imply an explosion epoch some time during the two day period between this epoch and discovery.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2.** Full UV to MIR light curve of SN 2017hcc. The ATLAS points have been averaged to within 0.3 MJD. The ATLAS upper limits have been marked with inverted open triangles. A vertical line has been placed at the explosion epoch to guide the eye.</figcaption></figure>

We compare SN 2017hcc to the slowly evolving SNe IIn SN 2010jl (Stoll et al. 2011) and SN 2015da (Tartaglia et al. 2020), as well as to members of the class that are, at least initially, faster evolving, viz. SN 1998S (Fassia et al. 2000) and SN 2005ip (Stritzinger et al. 2012). These objects were chosen due to their diversity and their well-sampled data sets, however there are many other examples of comparable objects. The details of the comparison objects can be seen in Table A.7. Other long-lasting SNe IIn with long rise times include PTF12glz, HSC16aayt (SN 2016jiu), and SN 2015da. PTF12glz had a rise time of about 50 days with photon diffusion through an aspherical CSM being offered as an explanation in that case (Soumagnac et al. 2019). HSC16aayt had an even slower rise, peaking at about -19.9 mag after over 100 days (Moriya et al. 2019). Similarly, SN 2015da had a rise time of 100 ± 5 days in the R band, peaking at around -20.45 ± 0.55 mag, and was observable for at least five years (Tartaglia et al. 2020).

The peak *r* band magnitudes of our SN IIn comparison sample span the space from -18 to -21 mag and the light curves last a few hundred to over a thousand days (Fig. 3). A larger sample, such as that considered in Nyholm et al. (2020), shows that SN 2017hcc and SN 2010jl are exceptionally bright and long lived compared to more typical SNe IIn.

Turning to the early colour evolution (Fig. 4), we see a reasonably steady transition towards the red for SN 2017hcc in the *B*−*V*, *g*−*r*, *r*−*i*, and *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub> colours over the first observing season (the first ~150 days), consistent with the spectral evolution (Sect. 5). The *B*−*V* evolution of SN 2005ip is not substantial, but SN 1998S behaves similarly to SN 2017hcc with its

swift movement redwards. The *B*−*V* evolution of SN 2015da is rather similar to that of SN 2017hcc, though it remains redder throughout. In *g*−*r* SN 2005ip and SN 2015da, like SN 2017hcc, are seen moving towards the red, though the shapes of the early evolution of SN 2005ip and SN 2015da differ from that of SN 2017hcc, with SN 2005ip quickly moving to a plateau before rising again and the evolution of SN 2015da being more gradual. The early evolution of SN 1998S in *V*−*R* is very similar to that of SN 2017hcc in *g*−*r*. The early colour evolution of SN 2010jl contrasts with that of SN 2017hcc in that it steadily moves bluewards in *r*−*i*. Like SN 2017hcc in *r*−*i*, the SN 2015da and SN 1998S *R*−*I* colours drift towards the red at early times before turning back towards the blue. SN 2017hcc has a strong shift towards the red in *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub> in season one, but without any corresponding blueshifted spectral line evolution, which would often be seen in the case of dust formation in the ejecta. The *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub> colour of SN 1998S has a similar redwards evolution to SN 2017hcc during the period corresponding to season one of the SN 2017hcc observations, but SN 2010jl is fairly flat at this time, as is SN 2015da. At early times SN 2015da is redder than SN 2017hcc in all colours and appears to evolve more slowly, though also in a redwards direction.

The colour curves in season two (~+230 d to +460 d) are markedly different from those in the first season. Looking at the *B*−*V* and *g*−*r* colours (see Fig. 4), we see SN 2017hcc trending back towards the blue, though the scatter is large in the case of the *B*−*V* colour curve. SN 2015da has a similar trend towards the blue in *B*−*V* during an equivalent period, despite its consistently redder colour, but in *g*−*r* it is fairly
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 3.** Comparison of the *r* band light curve of SN 2017hcc with that of SN 2010jl (Fransson et al. 2014) and SN 2005ip (Stritzinger et al. 2012), SN 2015da (Tartaglia et al. 2020) along with the *R* band photometry of SN 1998S (Fassia et al. 2000). The open circles for SN 2005ip are unfiltered KAIT data (Smith et al. 2009), which are taken to be roughly equivalent to *R* band. The error bars, where not visible, are smaller than the points. All light curves have been corrected for foreground extinction and time dilation. Phases are given against discovery date. Following (Tartaglia et al. 2020), we do not account for the host extinction of SN 2015da, but note that it could be significant (*A*<sub>R</sub> = 2–3 mag).

stable at this time. The overall bluewards evolution of SN 2017hcc does not appear to be caused by an increase in photospheric temperature (see Fig. 5, and discussion of the bolometric light curve in Sect. 3.2). Rather, the colour evolution at this phase is likely due to changes in line emission which is affecting broadband photometry. In *r* – *i* it appears that SN 2017hcc remains at a roughly constant colour during the second season, whilst SN 2010jl and SN 2015da evolve towards the blue at equivalent times. Both SN 2010jl and SN 2015da show redwards evolution in *V*–*K*<sub>s</sub> during the period corresponding to the second season of SN 2017hcc.

SN 2017hcc and SN 2015da appear to plateau in *B*−*V* in season three (from ~+600 d to ~+800 d), whilst SN 2010jl becomes bluer. In *g* − *r* SN 2017hcc shows a very slight trend towards the red with SN 2015da instead moving towards the blue, though it nevertheless remains far redder than SN 2017hcc. SN 2017hcc moves further redwards at this time in *r* − *i*, as does SN 2015da, whilst SN 2010jl instead continues on a trend of decreasing *r* − *i* colour. SN 2017hcc is also significantly further to the red in *V* − *K*<sub>s</sub> in the third season than in the second, though later (~+1000 d) we see that there has been movement back towards the blue. The redwards evolution of SN 2017hcc, initially present in all bands, is only maintained in the colours containing redder bands as time goes on, reflecting the decreasing temperature of the continuum and the increasing prominence of the infrared black body component (Fig. 6).

## 3.2. Bolometric light curve

We constructed both pseudo-bolometric and bolometric light curves (Fig. 7) using SUPERBOL (Nicholl 2018), and including the following bands: UVW2, UVM2, UVW1 and UBgcVroiz-JHKS. We extrapolated and interpolated missing light curve data for a given filter assuming a constant colour relation with the nearest epochs; however, in the case of the Swift filters from U to UVW2 we fitted a second order polynomial which we

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 4.** From top to bottom, *B*−*V*, *g*−*r*, *r*−*i*, and *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub> colour curves for SN 2017hcc, compared to a selection of SNe IIn. The photometry has been averaged to one MJD (with errors added in quadrature), with colours then having been calculated with observations within one day of each other in the relevant bands, except in the case of the *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub> observations where a larger window of seven days has been allowed, due to the paucity of observations. The errors bars, when not visible, are smaller than the points. Phases are given against discovery date, except in the case of SN 2017hcc, where the explosion epoch is used. No extinction corrections have been applied to the colours. In the second panel the SN 1998S data are actually *V*−*R* rather than *g*−*r* and in the third panel both the SN 1998S data and the SN 2015da data are *R*−*I* rather than *r*−*i*. In the final panel the SN 2010jl and SN 1998S data are actually *V*−*K* rather than *V*−*K*<sub>s</sub>. The dashed vertical lines mark the beginning of seasons one, two, three and four, five and six, respectively.

used for the later evolution in season one (the first ~150 days), whilst we assumed that the colour was constant in the period before the first observations in those bands. We did not consider any contribution from the *U* to UVW2 bands in later seasons (which were calculated separately), given the considerable
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 5.** Full sequence of optical spectra of SN 2017hcc, plotted in the SN rest frame. The wavelengths of some of the stronger SN lines are marked with coloured bands. The flux values for each spectrum have been normalised against the peak of $H\alpha$.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 6.** Black body fits to the spectral energy distribution. In the first two panels, representing early times, a single black body is sufficient to fit the SED, but in the final three panels, far later in the evolution of the SN, two black bodies are necessary. The *r* band data points were not included due to the influence of the strong Hα emission in this range. In each panel all points are from epochs within ten days of the listed phase, after interpolation. It should be noted that the second black body +92 d SED fit had an upper limit of 2500 K on the possible model temperatures and the model determined by the MCMC fitting is very close to this value. The horizontal bars on each point represent the bandwidths of the filters. The temperatures and radii of the black body fits used are given in each panel. This has been corrected for foreground extinction.

drop-off in season one. After the initial peak there is a steady decline in the pseudo-bolometric light curve, as one would expect from the optical light curve. However, the temperature evolution panel in Fig. 7 suggests an increase in temperature in the second season that begins a little after 200 days post explosion, and which is matched by a faster decrease in the radius. Whilst this could potentially be explained by the CSM inter-

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 7.** Plot of black body fit parameters. Top panel: Pseudo-bolometric light curve for SN 2017hcc, constructed from the UVW2, UVM2, UVW1, and UBgcVroizJHKs bands. In construction of the pseudo-bolometric light curve, we removed points obtained from Autophot with S/N < 10. Middle panel: Corresponding temperature evolution of the black body. Bottom panel: Corresponding evolution of the black body radius. The cyan triangles and brown diamonds represent the black body fits shown in Fig. 6.

action reheating the ejecta, this change does not appear to be reflected in the colour evolution, and it can be seen in Fig. 6 that a second black body becomes necessary to fit the spectral energy distribution (SED) at later times. It should be noted that the temperature of the first black body increases between +92 d and +399 d. This can be explained by a forest of Fe II lines, typical in SNe IIn, which affects the broadband photometry.

We examined the SED evolution of SN 2017hcc over time by fitting it with black bodies (Fig. 6). At early times a single black body is sufficient to fit the SED. However, as time goes on, a clear IR excess becomes evident and a second black body is required to fit this component. We did not include the *r* band data in the SED, because the presence of the strong Hα emission within this wavelength range artificially boosts the flux, preventing the description of the SED with a black body.
SN 2005ip also displayed a growing IR excess with time, being
fitted with two black bodies in Stritzinger et al. (2012) with the
cooler black body becoming dominant by +100 d. SN 2015da
was another SN IIn showing such an excess; it required a second
black body from +443 d in order to reproduce the cooler compo-
nent of the SED (Tartaglia et al. 2020).

In order to explore the possible range of parameters that
could generate the observed luminosity, we used the Python-
based TigerFit<fnref n="16" /> code to fit models with a constant-density
CSM shell to the bolometric light curve of SN 2017hcc. The
TigerFit code makes use of semi-analytical light curve models
described in Chatzopoulos et al. (2012, 2013), Kasen & Bildsten
(2010) and Dexter & Kasen (2013), based on the approaches
outlined in Arnett (1980, 1982). However, despite trialling mod-
els with an extremely broad range of parameters, we were unable
to simultaneously describe the peak, early evolution and late evo-
lution in a manner consistent with observations, suggesting more
sophisticated modelling is required.

3.3. Infrared excess

The development of an IR excess becomes evident from the
V-Ks colour evolution soon after the peak (Fig. 4). We see that
an IR excess is clearly apparent in the optical-IR SED by +92 d
from explosion. At this point we find it necessary to include a
second black body component when fitting the SED (Fig. 6) and
we estimate that the IR component contributes roughly 13% of
the total luminosity obtained by summing the two black body
components. By +399 d the IR component is already very sig-
nificant, contributing over 50% of the total luminosity and this
increases to over 70% by +774 d. We discuss this further in
Sect. 6. There will naturally be a time delay between the arrival
of optical photons which are emitted directly towards the Earth
and those which are absorbed by dust and then re-emitted in
the IR (Graham & Meikle 1986), however we do not expect the
effect of this to be very significant given the very long time scale
of our light curve, so we do not account for it.

4. Spectral evolution

4.1. Optical spectra

The optical spectra of SN 2017hcc span a period of 1759 days (4.8 yr): from six to 1765 d post-explosion (Fig. 5). The overall evolution is generally slow, in line with the photometric evolution.

The spectra are initially characterised by a strong blue con-
tinuum and are dominated by strong Balmer emission, as is typ-
ical for a SN IIn. This can be seen clearly in our spectrum at
+32 d (Fig. 8), where the Hα, Hβ, and Hγ lines are visible. Hα
is well fitted by a single Lorentzian profile with a FWHM of
1170 ± 20 km s⁻¹. In addition, we see He I at λ5876 and λ7065
with a weak emission component and a P Cygni minimum at
4000 km s⁻¹.

Fitting a black body to the +32 d spectrum we find an effec-
tive temperature of 13.8 ± 0.1 kK. However, this cools rapidly
over the following week, dropping to 11.1 ± 0.1 kK at +38 d (we
see a consistent trend in the evolution of the pseudo-bolometric
light curve, see Sect. 3.2). The He I λ5876 emission also weak-
ens, relatively, over the first two months. The Fe II λ5018 line is
apparent from at least the +32 d spectrum in season one.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 8.** Early (+32 d; 2017 Nov. 1) spectrum fitted with a black body. Identified emission lines are labelled, and an inset shows a zoom in on the Hα line in velocity space.</figcaption></figure>

In Fig. 9 we show a medium-resolution (R ~ 5000) NOT+ALFOSC Gr#17 spectrum taken at +88 d covering the Hα region. The spectrum clearly shows a narrow P Cygni absorption, indicative of absorption by slow moving optically thick CSM along the line of sight. In order to measure velocities of this feature, we fitted it with a four component model to describe the narrow and broad emission and the narrow absorption, as well as the continuum. The components were chosen purely due to their ability to reproduce the profiles seen in the data. These components are shown separately in Fig. 9, and the composite model does an excellent job of reproducing the observed Hα profile, though there are a lot of parameters. The narrow Lorentzian has a FWHM of ~63 km s⁻¹, whilst the P Cygni absorption has a minimum velocity of ~−51 km s⁻¹ with respect to the peak of the Lorentzian which we take as the pre-SN wind velocity of the progenitor. The FWHM of the broad Gaussian we fitted to the emission is ~795 km s⁻¹. The aforementioned values have not been corrected for instrumental resolution and it is likely that the narrow emission feature that we fit with the narrow Lorentzian is not truly resolved.

At approximately +120 d, SN 2017hcc disappeared behind
the Sun. When it re-emerged, at ~+230 d, the Hα emission had
become broader, with a velocity of 1690 ± 20 km s⁻¹ at ~+270 d
and the centre of the emission was clearly blueshifted with
respect to the rest wavelength. The [Ca II] λλ7291,7323 lines
became visible in the +230 d spectrum, with a velocity broadly
similar to that of Hα. At some point between 104 and 230 days
post-explosion the Ca II λλλ8498,8542,8662 triplet appears. The
triplet grows in relative strength over the course of the next
200 days. The He I λ7065 line appears to have grown in rela-
tive prominence by +230 d (the He I λ5876 line also appears to
strengthen, but this is affected by blending with Na I D). It con-
tinues to be present throughout season two, though appears to
weaken in relative prominence over the course of the season.
After about +400 d we see a pseudo-continuum beginning to
form in the blue. Many emission lines, primarily iron, combine
in raising the flux bluewards of about 5000 Å. Similar behaviour
has been seen in other SNe IIn (e.g., SN 1995N, Fransson et al.
2002; SN 2005ip, Stritzinger et al. 2012). We do not see a clear
bluewards evolution in the B - V colours at late times, how-
ever there are relatively large uncertainties on our photometric

<footnote n="16">¹⁶ https://github.com/manolis07gr/TigerFit</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 9.** Fitting the +88 d Hα profile taken with the medium-resolution NOT Gr#17 spectrum (blue). Dashed lines show the individual components: the orange and green lines are Gaussian fits to the broad component and absorption trough, respectively; the red is a Lorentzian profile fit to the narrow emission component, and the purple line represents the underlying continuum. The solid black line shows the composite fit. The inset shows a wider wavelength range revealing the broad wings in Hα. The orange component in the inset has been multiplied by a factor of 3 to more clearly demonstrate its shape. The vertical line marks zero velocity.

measurements at this phase. In the +230 d spectrum the Fe II λ4924 and λ5018 lines are evident, with the λ5169 component of the multiplet becoming evident only later, after around +300 d.

The [Ca II] λλ7291,7323 lines are no longer visible in the +672 d spectrum. The Ca II λλλ8498,8542,8662 triplet weakens throughout the third season, being only barely evident in the +791 d spectrum. The Ca II triplet is noticeably weaker than its final season two appearance even in the first season three spectrum to include the relevant wavelength range. The He I λ5876 and λ7065 emission lines appear to fade by +791 d. As Hα is the strongest line that is visible throughout the evolution of SN 2017hcc, we use it to investigate the velocity evolution (see Fig. 10). For the purpose of consistency, we only used the 1.0" slit spectra from the ALFOSC instrument. The Hα FWHM is measured to determine the velocity of the post-shock material, as such it is the intermediate-width component with which we concern ourselves. For each spectrum we measure the instrumental resolution from the FWHM of the [O I] λ5577.34 sky emission line. We fitted Lorentzian and/or Gaussian functions to Hα and determined their FWHM values which were then corrected for instrumental resolution. The uncertainty in our measurements is dominated by the choice of continuum region, so we sampled the FWHM of the +306 d spectrum eight times in order to choose a representative standard deviation, which we then applied to all epochs. The first two epochs are well matched by a single Lorentzian, indicative of more electron scattering at early times due to denser CSM. At later times we instead fitted two Gaussians, with one being used to account for the broad base seen in Fig. 11; however, the use of this Gaussian was purely a functional choice and we ascribe no physical significance to it. We can see that the velocity in the first epoch is around 1170 km s⁻¹, whilst a much higher plateau of about 1650 km s⁻¹ is seen in the second season. Later on, there is a gradual decline before reaching approximately 940 km s⁻¹ by around +800 d.

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 10.** Evolution of the Hα FWHM in the NOT+ALFOSC Gr#4 1.0" spectra over time. For each spectrum in the second season (after around +230 d) we fitted two Gaussian profiles to Hα, but those corresponding to the broad base are not shown here. As alluded to above, all spectra were taken with an identical setup. The values have been corrected for instrumental resolution. The errors on each point represent a characteristic error, determined by repeated sampling of the skyline and Hα FWHM of the +306 d spectrum.

In Fig. 11 we show the evolution of Hα over time. A clear blueshift, also noted by Smith & Andrews (2020), is apparent in our data from +230 d, but this may be decreasing in our spectra by +1173 d. The +230 d Hα profile itself appears to have a flat top that persists out to ~+410 d. The flat top and blueshift are also present in the Hβ profile. We discuss this further in Sect. 6.

In Fig. 12 we show the evolution of equivalent width of the He I λ7065 line. This region of the spectrum is relatively free of contamination from other lines throughout the evolution. Having chosen a region wide enough to encompass the line, we fit a continuum across it, and integrate the area underneath following Ebbets (1995). A clear increase in the absolute value of the equivalent width over time is visible. As this occurs even with falling temperatures we attribute it to greater non-thermal excitation of He I in CSM by increased CSM interaction.

## 4.2. Optical spectra comparison

We now consider how SN 2017hcc compares to the three other well-observed type IIa SNe shown in Fig. 13. We see a strong similarity between the spectrum of SN 2017hcc taken at +32 d and the spectrum of SN 1998S taken 3 days after explosion, whilst SN 1998S spectra at more similar epochs (e.g., +26 d) are quite distinct. Both spectra have a noticeably blue continuum and their emission features are similar; however, the spectrum of SN 1998S shows high ionisation lines of C III λ4648/N III λ4640 and He II λ4686, which are absent from the SN 2017hcc spectrum. These differences may be due to the early phase of the SN 1998S spectrum capturing photons coming from the shock breakout. This would explain the swift change in the appearance of the spectra of SN 1998S. SN 2010jl at a comparable epoch was much redder, though the overall emission features are similar to SN 2017hcc. SN 2005ip is also far redder than SN 2017hcc and has a broad component in the Hα emission which is absent in SN 2017hcc. At these early times the light curve evolution of these objects is rather distinct, so differing
<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 11.** Selection of spectra showing the evolution of the $H\alpha$ profile. The ALFOSC spectra (green) were taken with an identical set up. The other spectra were taken with different instruments, but all have been rebinned to a common resolution (Table A.5). The central vertical line is at the rest wavelength of $H\alpha$, whilst the vertical green, blue, and brown lines are 1000, 2000, and 3000 km s$^{-1}$ respectively from the rest wavelength. The flux values for each spectrum have been normalised against the corresponding peak value of $H\alpha$. The onset of a blueshift is apparent from +230 d onwards.

spectral presentation is not surprising. [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda7291,7323$ is either very weak or completely absent in the +190 d spectrum of SN 2010jl, but hints of this doublet can be seen in the +230 d spectrum for SN 2017hcc and it is quite apparent by the +453 d spectrum. The Ca II $\lambda\lambda8498,8542,8662$ triplet is clearly present in the +230 d and +453 d spectra of SN 2017hcc. It is present in SN 2010jl in panel c too, but it is less prominent.

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

**Fig. 12.** Evolution of the He I $\lambda$7065 line equivalent width over time. We only show those epochs for which the signal-to-noise ratio of the equivalent width measurement is greater than 5.

In the inset of panel a of Fig. 13, we see that the $H\alpha$ emission of SN 2010jl shows an excess in the blue. In the inset of panel b, the $H\alpha$ profiles of both SN 2017hcc and SN 2010jl are blueshifted and are broader than that seen in SN 2005ip, which, along with SN 1998S, displays a complex multipeaked profile. A multipeaked profile, though not seen here, is visible in SN 2010jl at higher resolution (Fransson et al. 2014; Jencson et al. 2016).

The $H\alpha$ of SN 2017hcc shows higher velocities than SN 2010jl and SN 2005ip. At late times, the $H\alpha$ velocities of SN 2010jl and SN 2017hcc are comparable, but SN 2010jl is clearly the more blueshifted of the two. The $H\alpha$ emission of SN 1998S continues to show a multipeaked structure with the central peak displaying a slight blueshift. The O I $\lambda$8446 line is clearly present in both SN 2017hcc and SN 2010jl at late times, but the SN 1998S spectrum does not extend to that wavelength, unfortunately.

The presence of the Fe II $\lambda$5018 line can be seen in panel a in SN 2017hcc, SN 2010jl and SN 2005ip. The Fe II $\lambda\lambda4924, 5018, 5169$ multiplet becomes visible in SN 2017hcc in panel b and is clearly present in panel c in both SN 2017hcc and SN 2010jl.

### 4.3. Infrared spectral evolution

The NIR spectra (Fig. 14) span a period of 301 d, from +39 to +340 d, with the first four spectra covering a short period up to day 73 during which the spectral features change little: the spectra are rather blue, with the clearest lines from the Paschen and Brackett series, whilst some weaker features likely due to O are also apparent. The final spectrum, taken at +340 d, shows significant evolution, and is markedly different from the earlier epochs. The Paschen and Brackett series now dominate the spectrum. Pa$\gamma$ appears to be blended with He I $\lambda$10830, and O I $\lambda$9264 and $\lambda$11287 are now also clearly discernible. The latter is stronger than the either of the O I $\lambda$7774 and $\lambda$9264 features, possibly due to excitation by UV photons via Ly$\beta$. At this epoch, the first overtone of CO is also visible (Fig. 14), and as with other core-collapse SNe, it probably appeared around +100 d, although our data do not allow us to be more precise.

In Fig. 15 we compare the +340 d spectrum of SN 2017hcc with those of other type IIa SNe at comparable epochs. The
<figure><img src="image_15.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 13.** Spectral comparison of SN 2017hcc with SN 2010j1 (Zhang et al. 2012; Jencson et al. 2016), SN 2005ip (Stritzinger et al. 2012) and SN 1998S (Leonard et al. 2000; Fransson et al. 2005) at four selected epochs. The spectra have been corrected for redshift. The inset in each panel shows $H\alpha$ with the rest velocity marked with a vertical line to make the blueshift more obvious. The telluric lines marked are those corresponding to the SN 2017hcc spectra. Phases are given against discovery date, except in the case of SN 2017hcc, where the explosion epoch is used. The flux values for each spectrum have been normalised against the corresponding peak value of $H\alpha$.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_16.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 14.** Complete sequence of NIR spectra for SN 2017hcc. The wavelengths of some of the stronger SN lines are marked with coloured bands and the two strong telluric absorption features are marked with pale grey columns.</figcaption></figure>

+379 d spectrum of SN 2010jl is quite similar to the SN 2017hcc spectrum in terms of the spectral features present. In the case of SN 1998S we show both the +126 d and +327 d spectra. The latter shows a clear red continuum, unlike SN 2017hcc, which instead shows a continuum more similar to that of SN 2010jl. The first CO overtone first appears in SN 1998S in a spectrum taken 109 d after discovery (Fassia et al. 2001). There is no clear evidence for the presence of the first CO overtone in any of the NIR spectra of SN 2010jl seen in Borish et al. (2015).

In Fig. 16 we compare the shapes of the $H\alpha$, $H\beta$, $Pa\beta$, and $Pa\delta$ profiles of SN 2017hcc. Those particular Paschen lines were chosen to avoid blending with other features. The difference in width of the optical and NIR lines at early times is likely to be due to differences in spectral resolution. At later times (+330 d

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 15.** Comparison of the +340 d spectrum of SN 2017hcc with late-time spectra of SN 1998S (Fassia et al. 2001; Pozzo et al. 2004) and SN 2010jl (Borish et al. 2015). Phases are given against discovery date, except in the case of SN 2017hcc, where explosion epoch is used.</figcaption></figure>

in the optical and +340 d in the NIR) there is a clear blueshift present, as already noted for $H\alpha$ and $H\beta$ in Sect. 4.1. The lines at late times are all in fairly good agreement with each other, though the Balmer lines do appear to display greater evidence of extinction, as would be expected from these bluer lines. The red shoulder visible in $H\beta$ is due to blending with $Fe\ II$.

## 5. Metallicity

We employed the O3N2 index, which uses the relative line strengths of [O III]/$H\beta$ and [N II]/$H\alpha$ to determine the metallicity of the host galaxy, as described in Pettini & Pagel (2004). We measured these lines from the +688 d MUSE spectrum. We extracted the spectrum with an aperture of radius 1.2 arcsec centred on the core of the host. It should be noted that we determined the metallicity at the host galaxy centre due to signal-to-noise constraints, whilst it appears that the SN itself exploded in a spiral arm, which would be expected to be of lower metallicity (Pilyugin & Thuan 2005). We determined the metallicity in terms of oxygen abundance to be $12 + \log(O/H) = 8.49 \pm 0.01$ dex, that is to say approximately two-thirds solar (Asplund et al. 2004).

## 6. Discussion

SN 2017hcc is a long-lived SN IIn that shows slow spectroscopic and photometric evolution as well as an IR excess, which becomes apparent soon after peak brightness. There are only a handful of type IIn SNe with five years of detailed observations.

The light curve shows a gradual rise to the peak ($57 \pm 2$ days, ATLAS *o* band) that is consistent with interaction with a massive and dense CSM, and can be explained by the diffusion timescale for photons through an optically thick CSM. The rise is followed by a monotonic decline, but after approximately two years the decline flattens out. There is no dramatic spectral change even at late times, and the emergence of nebular SN lines is not seen, suggesting that the optically thin inner ejecta never become
<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 16.** Comparison of the Hα, Hβ, Paβ, and Paδ lines of SN 2017hcc at different epochs (+72 d and +330 d for the optical and +71 d and +340 d for the NIR). The Balmer and Paschen lines at comparable epochs have been overplotted. The lines have been normalised against their peaks. The vertical line marks zero velocity.</figcaption></figure>

visible, or that the ejecta density remains too high for forbidden lines to form.

SN 2017hcc shows an IR excess, which is apparent shortly following peak brightness, and can be seen in the V-Ks colour evolution (Fig. 4) as well as in the SED fits (Fig. 6). Initially, a single black body is sufficient to match the SED, but a second, cooler, black body is needed to describe the SED after around 90 d. Such behaviour is fairly typical, and has been observed in many type IIn SNe, such as SN 2005ip (Stritzinger et al. 2012), SN 2010jl (Sarangi et al. 2018), and SN 2015da (Tartaglia et al. 2020), to name but a few.

Our analysis also included MIR photometry spanning 60–980 days and NIR photometry spanning 40–1170 days from explosion. At +110 d the IR excess can be described by a T ~ 1900 K black body component consistent with the evaporation temperature for graphite dust grains. Our estimated radius for the IR black body at +110 d of 2.3 ± 0.5 × 10¹⁶ cm corresponds to a black body velocity of ~24 000 km s⁻¹. The early onset of the IR excess together with the above values are suggestive of pre-existing dust in the CSM rather than condensation of new grains. Thus, these IR observations can be explained by absorption of the SN UV and optical photons and their re-radiation at IR wavelengths by the surrounding dust, that is to say an IR echo (e.g., Bode & Evans 1979; Graham et al. 1983).

Over the first ~100 days, we can fit the intermediate-width Hα emission with a single Lorentzian profile (Fig. 10), suggesting that for the first season the photosphere is located within the opaque CSM. After +200 d the shocked ejecta start to become visible (when we see a FWHM of 1650 km s⁻¹). Given that maximum velocities of over 5000 km s⁻¹ are seen after +200 d (Fig. 10), may suggest that we are seeing freely expanding ejecta as the CSM starts to fragment.

We also note that Hα appears to have a flat top between ~700 and +300 km s⁻¹. Flat-topped or boxy profiles have been seen in a number of other SNe (e.g., SNe 1993J, 1995N Matheson et al. 2000; Fransson et al. 2002) where they have been accounted for as a sign of ejecta-CSM interaction, the flat

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 17.** Selection of spectra showing the evolution of the Hα line centre. The centres have been shifted slightly based on the position of the 6300.31 Å skyline, except in the case of +32 d and +330 d ALFOSC spectra and the +272 d EFOSC spectrum which have been shifted based on the position of the the 5577.34 Å line as the 6300.31 Å line was not detectable.</figcaption></figure>

top resulting from emission from a homologously expanding cool dense shell (CDS) formed between the forward and reverse shocks (e.g., Dessart & Hillier 2022). The appearance of the flat top is coincident with the increase in the equivalent width of the He I λ7065 line (Fig. 12) and the decrease in the decline rate of the light curve (Fig. 2), both of which are signs of ejecta-CSM interaction. This also aligns with the beginning of the blueshift visible in the Hα line profiles (~350 km s⁻¹ at +230 d, Fig. 11), as the ejecta-CSM interaction and CDS are being exposed, having previously been hidden below the CSM.

A natural explanation for blueshifted emission lines is the condensation of new dust grains that increasingly block the receding part of the expanding ejecta (Lucy et al. 1989). Indeed, Smith & Andrews (2020) interpreted the increasing blueshift of the emission lines from +24 d to +848 d in SN 2017hcc as resulting from newly formed dust in either a post-shock CDS or in the SN ejecta.

However, upon closer examination of the centroid of the intermediate component of Hα over time (Fig. 17), we find a maximum blueshift (~7 Å) at the start of season two. After this point the peak evolves redwards, almost to rest until around +430 d and after this epoch we see a gradual evolution towards the blue again, but not as large as that seen at earlier epochs. In the final four epochs, +1173 d to +1765 d we see a shift back towards the rest wavelength.

It is likely that the early blueshifted emission results from the fast-moving (a few 1000 km s⁻¹) dense shell of material consisting of decelerated ejecta and swept-up CSM. This, combined with the fact that it is also optically thick in the continuum, means that line photons emitted in the red are preferentially absorbed (Hillier & Dessart 2012; Dessart et al. 2015). Indeed, the decreasing blueshift together with a lack of a sudden and marked increase in the infrared flux argues against dust formation in the CDS at these epochs. However, as noted above, the situation is complicated by an excursion bluewards between ~500 and 1000 d, possibly indicative of the onset of grain condensation, facilitated by the decreasing optical depth of the shell, allowing clumpy material therein to cool down. However, taking the latest spectra (≥1000 d) at face value, any condensation
of grains appears to occur in a short and finite window. In light of the above, it therefore seems likely that the IR emission in SN 2017hcc originated from a combination of pre-existing and newly formed dust similar to a number of other IIn SNe, for example SN 2010jl (Chugai 2018).

By +399 d, +773 d, and +1020 d our two component black body fits yield a *T* = 1640, 1160, and 940 K for the IR component, respectively. Within the errors, the black body radius remains constant until +1020 d with the black body velocity at this epoch corresponding to ~2600 km s⁻¹. This is consistent with the dust being located in the CDS or in the SN ejecta.

Previously, dust formation in the post-shock CDS has been observed, such as in SN 1998S, where the dust formation was suggested to have taken place behind the reverse shock (Pozzo et al. 2004), and in the SN Ibn SN 2006jc, where the dust formation probably occurred behind the forward shock (Mattila et al. 2008). It is difficult to pinpoint the exact location given that different, and time dependent processes both destroy and form dust grains as the SN evolves.

SN 2017hcc shows particular similarities to SN 2010jl, especially in terms of overall brightness and spectral evolution. Both showed blueshifted $H\alpha$ profiles up to late times, with SN 2010jl having such a profile at least as late as +1287 d (Bevan et al. 2020), though the blueshift may be fading in the case of SN 2017hcc at a comparable epoch. In the case of SN 2010jl the blueshift was explained by Fransson et al. (2014) as resulting from a highly asymmetric bulk motion of the scattering medium towards the observer. A similar blueshift in the $H\alpha$ was also observed in SN 2015da and was explained in the same fashion (Tartaglia et al. 2020). Interestingly, SN 2017hcc shows a symmetric $H\alpha$ profile around +1400 d, whereas SN 2010jl displays a clear multi-component structure at a comparable epoch. Combined with the significant (few percent) polarisation measurements (Mauerhan et al. 2017; Patat et al. 2011), this possibly implies a similar configuration of the CSM in these objects, but with different viewing angles to the line of sight.

Long-lived SNe IIn tend to be found in low metallicity hosts, comparable to the LMC, making SN 2017hcc an apparent outlier in this respect. SN 2010jl, for example, was found in a low metallicity irregular dwarf host with metallicity $12 + \log(O/H) = 8.2 \pm 0.1$ dex and quite possibly had a low metallicity progenitor (Stoll et al. 2011). However, the existence of at least some SNe IIn with a very massive H-rich CSM in near-solar metallicity environments (e.g., 8.48 dex for SN 2015da, Tartaglia et al. 2020) complicates this picture. It is clear that objects such as SN 2017hcc require careful and detailed modelling to disentangle the progenitor and explosion properties from those of the CSM. It is also clear that results and trends from other studies of long-lived type IIn SNe can only be applied in a qualitative sense, and it remains to be determined whether these SNe share a common combination of parameters that determine their behaviour.

**Acknowledgements.** We thank the anonymous referee for carefully reading the manuscript. SM acknowledges support from the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation and the Vilho, Yrjö, and Kalle Väisälä Foundation. MF is supported by a Royal Society – Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship. RK acknowledges support from the Academy of Finland. SJB acknowledges support from Science Foundation Ireland and the Royal Society (RS-EA/3471). HK was funded by the Academy of Finland projects 324504 and 328898. AR acknowledges support from ANID BECAS/DOCTORADO NACIONAL 21202412. GL was supported by a research grant (19054) from VILLUM FONDEN. LT acknowledges support from MIUR (PRIN 2017 grant 20179ZF5KS). LG acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) 10.13039/501100011033, and the European Social Fund (ESF) "Investing in

your future" under the 2019 Ramón y Cajal programme RYC2019-027683-I and the PID2020-115253GA-I00 HOSTFLOWS project, from Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) under the PIE project 20215AT016, and the programme Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2020-001058-M. MN is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 948381) and by a Fellowship from the Alan Turing Institute. TMR acknowledges the financial support of the Jenny and Antti Wihuri foundation and the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters through the Finnish postdoc pool and the Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation. NER acknowledges partial support from MIUR, PRIN 2017 (grant 20179ZF5KS), from the Spanish MICINN grant PID2019-108709GB-I00 and FEDER funds, and from the programme Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2020-001058-M. MG is supported by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101004719. TEMB acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) 10.13039/501100011033 under the PID2020-115253GA-I00 HOSTFLOWS project, and from Centro Superior of Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) under the PIE project 20215AT016 and the I-LINK 2021 LINKA20409. TEMB was also partially supported by the programme Unidad de Excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2020-001058-M. MS acknowledges the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under contract 80HQTR19D0030 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, owned in collaboration by the University of Turku and Aarhus University, and operated jointly by Aarhus University, the University of Turku and the University of Oslo, representing Denmark, Finland and Norway, the University of Iceland and Stockholm University at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, La Palma, Spain, of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. The data presented here were obtained in part with ALFOSC, which is provided by the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA) under a joint agreement with the University of Copenhagen and NOT. This work makes use of observations from the LCOGT network. Based on observations collected at Copernico and Schmidt telescopes (Asiago, Italy) of the INAF – Observatorio Astronomico di Padova, and the 1.22 Galileo Galilei Telescope of the Padova University in the Asiago site. We acknowledge ESA Gaia, DPAC and the Photometric Science Alerts Team (http://gsaweb.ast.cam.ac.uk/alerts). Based on observations made with the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, on the island of La Palma. This work is (partly) based on data obtained with the instrument OSIRIS, built by a Consortium led by the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias in collaboration with the Instituto de Astronomía of the Universidad Autónoma de México. OSIRIS was funded by GRANTECAN and the National Plan of Astronomy and Astrophysics of the Spanish Government. The Liverpool Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma by Liverpool John Moores University in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias with financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council. Based on observations made with the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) operated on the island of La Palma by the Fundación Galileo Galilei of the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This research has made use of the APASS database, located at the AVSO web site. Funding for APASS has been provided by the Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund. Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory under ESO programmes 199.D-0143, 1101.D-0105, and 1103.D-0328. Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programme 0103.D-0440. Based on data obtained from the ESO Science Archive Facility. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions of the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen's University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants No.s NNX08AR22G, NNX12AR65G, and NNX14AM74G, the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE), the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. This work has made use of data from the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) project. ATLAS is primarily funded to search for near earth asteroids through NASA grants NN12AR55G,
80NSSC18K0284, and 80NSSC18K1575; byproducts of the NEO search include images and catalogues from the survey area. The ATLAS science products have been made possible through the contributions of the University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy, the Queen's University Belfast, the Space Telescope Science Institute, and the South African Astronomical Observatory. This publication also makes use of data products from NEOWISE, which is a project of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the Planetary Science Division of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

## References

Andrews, J. E., Clayton, G. C., Wesson, R., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 45

Arnett, W. D. 1980, ApJ, 237, 541

Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., Allende Prieto, C., & Kiselman, D. 2004, A&A, 417, 751

Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002

Bevan, A. M., Krafton, K., Wesson, R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 111

Bode, M. F., & Evans, A. 1979, A&A, 73, 113

Borish, H. J., Huang, C., Chevalier, R. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 7

Breeveld, A. A., Curran, P. A., Hoversten, E. A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1687

Brennan, S. J., & Fraser, M. 2022, A&A, 667, A62

Brown, P. J., Breeveld, A. A., Holland, S., Kuin, P., & Pritchard, T. 2014, Ap&SS, 354, 89

Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 165

Cappellaro, E., Botticella, M. T., Pignata, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A62

Chandra, P., Chevalier, R. A., James, N. J. H., & Fox, O. D. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4151

Chatzopoulos, E., Wheeler, J. C., & Vinko, J. 2012, ApJ, 746, 121

Chatzopoulos, E., Wheeler, J. C., Vinko, J., Horvath, Z. L., & Nagy, A. 2013, ApJ, 773, 76

Chugai, N. N. 1997, Ap&SS, 252, 225

Chugai, N. N. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3643

Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362

Dessart, L., & Hillier, D. J. 2022, A&A, 660, L9

Dessart, L., Audit, E., & Hillier, D. J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4304

Dexter, J., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 772, 30

Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., et al. 2021, Class. Quant. Grav., 38, 153001

Dong, S., Bersier, D., & Prieto, J. L. 2017, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2017-1103, 1

Ebbets, D. 1995, in Calibrating Hubble Space Telescope. Post Servicing Mission, eds. A. P. Koratkar, & C. Leitherer, 207

Eldridge, J. J., Fraser, M., Smartt, S. J., Maund, J. R., & Crockett, R. M. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 774

Fassia, A., Meikle, W. P. S., Vacca, W. D., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 1093

Fassia, A., Meikle, W. P. S., Chugai, N., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 907

Fransson, C., Chevalier, R. A., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 350

Fransson, C., Challis, P. M., Chevalier, R. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 991

Fransson, C., Ergon, M., Challis, P. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 118

Fraser, M. 2020, Roy. Soc. Open Sci., 7, 200467

Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hatt, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 34

Gal-Yam, A. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, eds. A. W. Alsabti, & P. Murdin, 195

Galbany, L., Anderson, J. P., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4087

Graham, J. R., & Meikle, W. P. S. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 789

Graham, J. R., Meikle, W. P. S., Selby, M. J., et al. 1983, Nature, 304, 709

Hillier, D. J., & Dessart, L. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 252

Hodgkin, S. T., Harrison, D. L., Breedt, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A76

Huber, M., Chambers, K. C., Flewelling, H., et al. 2015, ATel, 7153, 1

Jencson, J. E., Prieto, J. L., Kochanek, C. S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2622

Kasen, D., & Bildsten, L. 2010, ApJ, 717, 245

Kiewe, M., Gal-Yam, A., Arcavi, I., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 10

Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502

Kumar, B., Eswaraiah, C., Singh, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3089

Leonard, D. C., Filippenko, A. V., Barth, A. J., & Matheson, T. 2000, ApJ, 536, 239

Li, W., Leaman, J., Chornock, R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1441

Li, J., Gao, J., Jiang, B., & Lin, Z. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2021

Lucy, L. B., Danziger, I. J., Gouiffes, C., & Bouchet, P. 1989, in IAU Colloq. 120: Structure and Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium, eds. G. Tenorio-Tagle, M. Moles, & J. Melnick, 350, 164

Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 6

Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 53

Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 30

Matheson, T., Filippenko, A. V., Barth, A. J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1487

Mattila, S., Meikle, W. P. S., Lundqvist, P., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 141

Mauerhan, J. C., Filippenko, A. V., Brink, T. G., & Zheng, W. 2017, ATel, 10911, 1

Miller, A. A., Silverman, J. M., Butler, N. R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 305

Minkowski, R. 1941, PASP, 53, 224

Moriya, T. J., Tanaka, M., Morokuma, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 70

Nicholl, M. 2018, Res. Am. Astron. Soc., 2, 230

Nyholm, A., Sollerman, J., Tartaglia, L., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A73

Ofek, E. O., Zackay, B., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2019, PASP, 131

Ofek, E. O., Zoglauer, A., Boggs, S. E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 42

Patat, F., Taubenberger, S., Benetti, S., Pastorello, A., & Harutyunyan, A. 2011, A&A, 527, L6

Pettini, M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59

Pilyugin, L. S., & Thuan, T. X. 2005, ApJ, 631, 231

Poznanski, D., Ganeshalingam, M., Silverman, J. M., & Filippenko, A. V. 2011, MNRAS, 415, L81

Poznanski, D., Prochaska, J. X., & Bloom, J. S. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1465

Pozzo, M., Meikle, W. P. S., Fassia, A., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 457

Prieto, J. L., Chen, P., Dong, S., et al. 2017, Res. Am. Astron. Soc., 1, 28

Pskovskii, Y. P. 1965, Soviet Astron., 9, 253

Roming, P. W. A., Kennedy, T. E., Mason, K. O., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 95

Sarangi, A., Dwek, E., & Arendt, R. G. 2018, ApJ, 859, 66

Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

Schlegel, E. M. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 269

Schultz, G. V., & Wiemer, W. 1975, A&A, 43, 133

Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

Smartt, S. J., Valenti, S., Fraser, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A40

Smith, K. W., Smartt, S. J., Young, D. R., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 085002

Smith, N. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, eds. A. W. Alsabti, & P. Murdin (Cham: Springer), 403

Smith, N., & Andrews, J. E. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 3544

Smith, N., Li, W., Miller, A. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 63

Smith, N., Silverman, J. M., Chornock, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 1334

Soumagnac, M. T., Ofek, E. O., Gal-yam, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 141

Stoll, R., Prieto, J. L., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 34

Stritzinger, M., Taddia, F., Fransson, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 173

Szalai, T., Fox, O. D., Arendt, R. G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 17

Tartaglia, L., Pastorello, A., Sollerman, J., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A39

Tonry, J., Stalder, B., Denneau, L., et al. 2017, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2017-1070, 1

Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A. N., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064505

Willingale, R., Starling, R. L. C., Beardmore, A. P., Tanvir, N. R., & O'Brien, P. T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 394

Zhang, T., Wang, X., Wu, C., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 131
Appendix A: Tables

<table><caption>Table A.1. Optical photometry, apart from that of *Swift*. The *B* and *V* filters are in Vega magnitudes and the *griz* filters are in AB magnitudes.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>B (err)</th><th>V (err)</th><th>g (err)</th><th>r (err)</th><th>i (err)</th><th>z (err)</th><th>Telescope (Instrument)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-11-03</td><td>58060.9</td><td>33.5</td><td>13.85 (0.02)</td><td>13.75 (0.03)</td><td>14.04 (0.01)</td><td>13.81 (0.05)</td><td>14.05 (0.05)</td><td>14.34 (0.07)</td><td>LT (IO:O)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-10</td><td>58067.0</td><td>39.6</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>14.30 (0.94)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-14</td><td>58071.9</td><td>44.5</td><td>14.02 (0.05)</td><td>13.60 (0.03)</td><td>13.60 (0.06)</td><td>13.64 (0.04)</td><td>13.81 (0.05)</td><td>13.99 (0.04)</td><td>LT (IO:O)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-16</td><td>58073.9</td><td>46.5</td><td>13.79 (0.06)</td><td>13.62 (0.04)</td><td>13.61 (0.03)</td><td>13.63 (0.04)</td><td>13.77 (0.05)</td><td>13.98 (0.06)</td><td>LT (IO:O)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-17</td><td>58074.8</td><td>47.4</td><td>13.52 (0.09)</td><td>13.66 (0.08)</td><td>13.64 (0.06)</td><td>13.70 (0.07)</td><td>13.78 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-18</td><td>58075.0</td><td>47.6</td><td>13.76 (0.03)</td><td>13.62 (0.06)</td><td>13.63 (0.05)</td><td>13.71 (0.04)</td><td>13.71 (0.05)</td><td>13.95 (0.05)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-19</td><td>58076.9</td><td>49.5</td><td>-</td><td>13.60 (0.05)</td><td>13.60 (0.08)</td><td>13.56 (0.06)</td><td>13.82 (0.08)</td><td>13.95 (0.04)</td><td>LT (IO:O)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-20</td><td>58077.9</td><td>50.5</td><td>13.85 (0.06)</td><td>13.63 (0.05)</td><td>13.63 (0.05)</td><td>12.46 (0.06)</td><td>13.72 (0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-26</td><td>58083.8</td><td>56.4</td><td>13.80 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-26</td><td>58083.9</td><td>56.5</td><td>-</td><td>13.65 (0.02)</td><td>13.64 (0.02)</td><td>13.64 (0.03)</td><td>13.74 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-30</td><td>58087.9</td><td>60.5</td><td>13.91 (0.06)</td><td>13.67 (0.07)</td><td>13.70 (0.06)</td><td>13.68 (0.03)</td><td>13.66 (0.09)</td><td>13.87 (0.08)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-03</td><td>58090.8</td><td>63.4</td><td>13.90 (0.04)</td><td>13.70 (0.05)</td><td>13.74 (0.03)</td><td>13.67 (0.03)</td><td>13.75 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-05</td><td>58092.8</td><td>65.4</td><td>13.92 (0.03)</td><td>13.70 (0.03)</td><td>13.72 (0.02)</td><td>13.66 (0.02)</td><td>13.76 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-07</td><td>58094.0</td><td>66.6</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>13.72 (0.02)</td><td>13.26 (0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-09</td><td>58096.7</td><td>69.3</td><td>-</td><td>13.74 (0.03)</td><td>13.76 (0.02)</td><td>13.70 (0.02)</td><td>13.77 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-09</td><td>58096.8</td><td>69.4</td><td>13.98 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-18</td><td>58105.7</td><td>78.3</td><td>14.22 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>13.97 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-18</td><td>58105.8</td><td>78.4</td><td>-</td><td>13.90 (0.07)</td><td>-</td><td>13.81 (0.06)</td><td>13.86 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-23</td><td>58110.9</td><td>83.5</td><td>14.31 (0.03)</td><td>13.84 (0.13)</td><td>14.03 (0.04)</td><td>13.79 (0.03)</td><td>13.81 (0.07)</td><td>14.00 (0.07)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-29</td><td>58116.8</td><td>89.4</td><td>14.52 (0.15)</td><td>13.99 (0.15)</td><td>14.24 (0.09)</td><td>13.98 (0.09)</td><td>13.88 (0.1)</td><td>14.12 (0.04)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-10</td><td>58128.7</td><td>101.3</td><td>14.90 (0.06)</td><td>14.38 (0.05)</td><td>14.54 (0.05)</td><td>14.21 (0.05)</td><td>14.19 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>Asiago Schmidt (Moravian)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-12</td><td>58130.8</td><td>103.4</td><td>14.98 (0.13)</td><td>14.31 (0.15)</td><td>14.68 (0.06)</td><td>14.27 (0.04)</td><td>14.19 (0.02)</td><td>14.29 (0.04)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-19</td><td>58137.8</td><td>110.4</td><td>-</td><td>14.49 (0.18)</td><td>14.79 (0.07)</td><td>14.39 (0.12)</td><td>14.40 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-05-19</td><td>58257.4</td><td>230.0</td><td>15.84 (0.02)</td><td>16.16 (0.03)</td><td>16.26 (0.03)</td><td>15.54 (0.03)</td><td>15.99 (0.04)</td><td>15.50 (0.05)</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-05-22</td><td>58260.4</td><td>233.0</td><td>16.78 (0.03)</td><td>16.22 (0.04)</td><td>16.29 (0.04)</td><td>15.58 (0.04)</td><td>16.05 (0.05)</td><td>15.52 (0.06)</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-05-28</td><td>58266.1</td><td>238.7</td><td>16.82 (0.1)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>15.61 (0.09)</td><td>16.11 (0.05)</td><td>15.50 (0.05)</td><td>LCO (fl16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-02</td><td>58271.4</td><td>244.0</td><td>16.84 (0.04)</td><td>16.31 (0.04)</td><td>16.41 (0.02)</td><td>15.68 (0.03)</td><td>16.18 (0.04)</td><td>15.64 (0.05)</td><td>LCO (fl15)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-11</td><td>58280.1</td><td>252.7</td><td>16.91 (0.03)</td><td>16.33 (0.02)</td><td>16.46 (0.01)</td><td>15.68 (0.03)</td><td>16.13 (0.04)</td><td>15.76 (0.08)</td><td>LCO (fl06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-17</td><td>58286.3</td><td>258.9</td><td>16.92 (0.05)</td><td>16.21 (0.02)</td><td>16.54 (0.05)</td><td>15.70 (0.04)</td><td>16.17 (0.06)</td><td>15.71 (0.05)</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-22</td><td>58291.3</td><td>263.9</td><td>16.99 (0.03)</td><td>16.42 (0.05)</td><td>16.55 (0.02)</td><td>15.82 (0.04)</td><td>16.26 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl15)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-27</td><td>58296.4</td><td>269.0</td><td>17.00 (0.05)</td><td>16.51 (0.05)</td><td>16.63 (0.04)</td><td>15.82 (0.04)</td><td>16.33 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl15)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-07</td><td>58306.1</td><td>278.7</td><td>17.08 (0.04)</td><td>16.61 (0.04)</td><td>16.73 (0.03)</td><td>15.90 (0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-07</td><td>58306.2</td><td>278.8</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>16.44 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-11</td><td>58310.3</td><td>282.9</td><td>17.17 (0.03)</td><td>16.65 (0.03)</td><td>16.73 (0.02)</td><td>15.92 (0.02)</td><td>16.47 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-14</td><td>58313.8</td><td>286.4</td><td>17.17 (0.02)</td><td>16.70 (0.03)</td><td>16.79 (0.02)</td><td>16.00 (0.03)</td><td>16.55 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-20</td><td>58319.8</td><td>292.4</td><td>17.20 (0.03)</td><td>16.75 (0.03)</td><td>16.83 (0.02)</td><td>16.05 (0.02)</td><td>16.58 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-22</td><td>58321.8</td><td>294.4</td><td>17.29 (0.04)</td><td>16.79 (0.04)</td><td>16.87 (0.02)</td><td>16.09 (0.03)</td><td>16.62 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-23</td><td>58322.6</td><td>295.2</td><td>17.19 (0.06)</td><td>16.77 (0.05)</td><td>16.89 (0.03)</td><td>16.08 (0.03)</td><td>16.61 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-25</td><td>58324.8</td><td>297.4</td><td>17.31 (0.03)</td><td>16.81 (0.03)</td><td>16.92 (0.02)</td><td>16.13 (0.02)</td><td>16.67 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-29</td><td>58328.7</td><td>301.3</td><td>17.35 (0.04)</td><td>16.86 (0.05)</td><td>16.95 (0.03)</td><td>16.19 (0.03)</td><td>16.69 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-04</td><td>58334.8</td><td>307.4</td><td>17.43 (0.03)</td><td>16.95 (0.04)</td><td>17.03 (0.03)</td><td>16.24 (0.03)</td><td>16.83 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-11</td><td>58341.3</td><td>313.9</td><td>17.50 (0.05)</td><td>17.04 (0.08)</td><td>17.10 (0.05)</td><td>16.35 (0.07)</td><td>17.03 (0.08)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-18</td><td>58348.1</td><td>320.7</td><td>17.49 (0.04)</td><td>17.13 (0.04)</td><td>17.12 (0.03)</td><td>16.45 (0.03)</td><td>17.10 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl06)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>Table A.1. continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>B (err)</th><th>V (err)</th><th>g (err)</th><th>r (err)</th><th>i (err)</th><th>z (err)</th><th>Telescope (Instrument)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2018-08-21</td><td>58351.5</td><td>324.1</td><td>17.64 (0.04)</td><td>17.21 (0.05)</td><td>17.18 (0.03)</td><td>16.46 (0.03)</td><td>17.18 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-09-01</td><td>58362.3</td><td>334.9</td><td>17.83 (0.06)</td><td>17.39 (0.06)</td><td>17.35 (0.05)</td><td>16.61 (0.04)</td><td>17.37 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-09-14</td><td>58375.7</td><td>348.3</td><td>17.89 (0.03)</td><td>17.54 (0.04)</td><td>17.47 (0.03)</td><td>16.83 (0.03)</td><td>17.56 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-09-28</td><td>58389.8</td><td>362.4</td><td>18.02 (0.04)</td><td>17.63 (0.05)</td><td>17.63 (0.03)</td><td>17.02 (0.04)</td><td>17.69 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-01</td><td>58392.1</td><td>364.7</td><td>18.20 (0.04)</td><td>17.76 (0.05)</td><td>17.83 (0.05)</td><td>17.21 (0.06)</td><td>17.55 (0.05)</td><td>17.09 (0.04)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-14</td><td>58405.9</td><td>378.5</td><td>18.17 (0.05)</td><td>17.88 (0.08)</td><td>17.80 (0.05)</td><td>17.19 (0.04)</td><td>17.87 (0.07)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-15</td><td>58406.0</td><td>378.6</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>17.89 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-26</td><td>58417.2</td><td>389.8</td><td>18.30 (0.12)</td><td>18.05 (0.09)</td><td>18.03 (0.06)</td><td>17.40 (0.04)</td><td>17.99 (0.08)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-29</td><td>58420.2</td><td>392.8</td><td>-</td><td>17.90 (0.08)</td><td>17.83 (0.04)</td><td>17.33 (0.1)</td><td>16.84 (0.77)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-31</td><td>58422.2</td><td>394.8</td><td>18.54 (0.1)</td><td>18.15 (0.08)</td><td>18.02 (0.04)</td><td>17.46 (0.04)</td><td>18.16 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-04</td><td>58426.0</td><td>398.6</td><td>18.38 (0.07)</td><td>18.06 (0.06)</td><td>18.03 (0.04)</td><td>17.49 (0.05)</td><td>18.13 (0.08)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-05</td><td>58427.4</td><td>400.0</td><td>18.24 (0.31)</td><td>18.24 (0.24)</td><td>17.94 (0.15)</td><td>16.63 (0.09)</td><td>18.11 (0.59)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-16</td><td>58438.8</td><td>411.4</td><td>18.44 (0.17)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-16</td><td>58438.9</td><td>411.5</td><td>-</td><td>18.25 (0.17)</td><td>18.30 (0.13)</td><td>17.74 (0.09)</td><td>18.15 (0.18)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-20</td><td>58442.9</td><td>415.5</td><td>18.74 (0.06)</td><td>18.37 (0.07)</td><td>18.36 (0.07)</td><td>17.96 (0.04)</td><td>18.32 (0.03)</td><td>17.67 (0.05)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-21</td><td>58443.9</td><td>416.5</td><td>18.49 (0.11)</td><td>17.99 (0.09)</td><td>17.97 (0.06)</td><td>17.64 (0.05)</td><td>18.15 (0.09)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa06)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-24</td><td>58446.1</td><td>418.7</td><td>18.69 (0.08)</td><td>18.40 (0.06)</td><td>18.29 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-24</td><td>58446.2</td><td>418.8</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>17.77 (0.05)</td><td>18.45 (0.07)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-27</td><td>58449.5</td><td>422.1</td><td>18.50 (0.2)</td><td>18.30 (0.05)</td><td>18.32 (0.03)</td><td>17.87 (0.03)</td><td>18.49 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-10</td><td>58462.1</td><td>434.7</td><td>18.86 (0.03)</td><td>18.55 (0.05)</td><td>18.47 (0.03)</td><td>17.99 (0.03)</td><td>18.58 (0.07)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-21</td><td>58473.1</td><td>445.7</td><td>18.97 (0.1)</td><td>18.50 (0.08)</td><td>18.55 (0.07)</td><td>18.03 (0.05)</td><td>18.62 (0.1)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa05)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-28</td><td>58480.9</td><td>453.5</td><td>18.97 (0.07)</td><td>18.64 (0.07)</td><td>18.67 (0.06)</td><td>18.30 (0.07)</td><td>18.54 (0.09)</td><td>18.19 (0.1)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-05</td><td>58639.4</td><td>612.0</td><td>19.71 (0.1)</td><td>19.67 (0.12)</td><td>19.50 (0.11)</td><td>19.31 (0.12)</td><td>19.76 (0.37)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-13</td><td>58647.2</td><td>619.8</td><td>19.83 (0.25)</td><td>19.76 (0.28)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-20</td><td>58654.2</td><td>626.8</td><td>20.08 (0.16)</td><td>19.87 (0.07)</td><td>19.86 (0.04)</td><td>19.72 (0.05)</td><td>19.97 (0.12)</td><td>19.74 (0.1)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-22</td><td>58656.8</td><td>629.4</td><td>20.06 (0.18)</td><td>19.77 (0.17)</td><td>19.37 (0.16)</td><td>19.59 (0.16)</td><td>19.25 (0.31)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl11)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-12</td><td>58676.4</td><td>649.0</td><td>19.90 (0.08)</td><td>19.44 (0.1)</td><td>19.49 (0.08)</td><td>19.28 (0.15)</td><td>16.62 (0.76)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa05)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-21</td><td>58685.2</td><td>657.8</td><td>20.25 (0.1)</td><td>19.97 (0.06)</td><td>20.04 (0.08)</td><td>19.84 (0.05)</td><td>20.11 (0.13)</td><td>20.03 (0.1)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-24</td><td>58688.8</td><td>661.4</td><td>19.95 (0.11)</td><td>19.67 (0.12)</td><td>19.92 (0.07)</td><td>19.75 (0.08)</td><td>20.14 (0.2)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fl12)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-04</td><td>58699.8</td><td>672.4</td><td>20.24 (0.06)</td><td>20.15 (0.07)</td><td>20.06 (0.05)</td><td>19.89 (0.07)</td><td>20.17 (0.15)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa11)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-05</td><td>58700.1</td><td>672.7</td><td>20.17 (0.29)</td><td>19.66 (0.18)</td><td>19.90 (0.06)</td><td>19.74 (0.09)</td><td>19.94 (0.12)</td><td>20.05 (0.12)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-13</td><td>58708.0</td><td>680.6</td><td>19.98 (0.19)</td><td>19.55 (0.19)</td><td>19.88 (0.12)</td><td>19.26 (0.11)</td><td>19.71 (0.13)</td><td>19.53 (0.19)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-17</td><td>58712.1</td><td>684.7</td><td>20.29 (0.27)</td><td>19.89 (0.28)</td><td>20.04 (0.19)</td><td>19.78 (0.23)</td><td>20.14 (0.34)</td><td>20.39 (0.8)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-20</td><td>58715.2</td><td>687.8</td><td>19.96 (0.17)</td><td>19.96 (0.13)</td><td>19.87 (0.12)</td><td>19.68 (0.15)</td><td>20.06 (0.18)</td><td>20.23 (0.33)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-20</td><td>58715.4</td><td>688.0</td><td>20.32 (0.33)</td><td>20.04 (0.27)</td><td>20.09 (0.23)</td><td>19.68 (0.18)</td><td>20.09 (0.34)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa05)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-02</td><td>58728.3</td><td>700.9</td><td>20.29 (0.06)</td><td>20.07 (0.07)</td><td>20.01 (0.06)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-02</td><td>58728.4</td><td>701.0</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19.98 (0.07)</td><td>20.4 (0.15)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-09</td><td>58735.0</td><td>707.6</td><td>19.91 (0.17)</td><td>19.26 (0.09)</td><td>19.78 (0.11)</td><td>18.89 (0.1)</td><td>19.16 (0.11)</td><td>19.09 (0.17)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-16</td><td>58742.0</td><td>714.6</td><td>20.37 (0.16)</td><td>20.25 (0.14)</td><td>20.17 (0.13)</td><td>20.01 (0.15)</td><td>20.10 (0.28)</td><td>20.58 (0.3)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-17</td><td>58743.2</td><td>715.8</td><td>20.70 (0.55)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa05)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-17</td><td>58743.3</td><td>715.9</td><td>20.38 (0.44)</td><td>20.02 (0.33)</td><td>19.83 (0.23)</td><td>20.05 (0.48)</td><td>21.17 (1.6)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa05)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-09-28</td><td>58754.3</td><td>726.9</td><td>20.39 (0.1)</td><td>20.14 (0.11)</td><td>20.06 (0.07)</td><td>19.88 (0.09)</td><td>20.58 (0.2)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-10-09</td><td>58765.0</td><td>737.6</td><td>20.14 (0.35)</td><td>19.93 (0.67)</td><td>20.57 (1.44)</td><td>19.69 (0.75)</td><td>19.45 (0.6)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A.1.** continued.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch<br>(d)</th><th>B (err)</th><th>V (err)</th><th>g (err)</th><th>r (err)</th><th>i (err)</th><th>z (err)</th><th>Telescope (Instrument)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2019-10-20</td><td>58776.2</td><td>748.8</td><td>19.89 (0.1)</td><td>19.36 (0.1)</td><td>19.65 (0.11)</td><td>19.63 (0.13)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-10-20</td><td>58776.3</td><td>748.9</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19.65 (0.16)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa15)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-10-31</td><td>58787.0</td><td>759.6</td><td>19.97 (0.1)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-10-31</td><td>58787.1</td><td>759.7</td><td>-</td><td>19.82 (0.13)</td><td>19.92 (0.09)</td><td>20.02 (0.09)</td><td>20.22 (0.16)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-04</td><td>58791.0</td><td>763.6</td><td>20.20 (0.15)</td><td>19.98 (0.15)</td><td>20.33 (0.06)</td><td>20.09 (0.09)</td><td>19.92 (0.13)</td><td>20.02 (0.24)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-11</td><td>58798.1</td><td>770.7</td><td>20.12 (0.31)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-11</td><td>58798.2</td><td>770.8</td><td>-</td><td>19.55 (0.2)</td><td>19.72 (0.18)</td><td>19.42 (0.16)</td><td>20.29 (0.35)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa03)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-17</td><td>58804.9</td><td>777.5</td><td>20.27 (0.16)</td><td>20.12 (0.15)</td><td>20.29 (0.06)</td><td>19.82 (0.1)</td><td>20.15 (0.11)</td><td>20.26 (0.21)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-23</td><td>58810.0</td><td>782.6</td><td>20.29 (0.92)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa07)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-23</td><td>58810.1</td><td>782.7</td><td>20.10 (0.22)</td><td>19.41 (0.13)</td><td>19.68 (0.1)</td><td>19.11 (0.15)</td><td>20.01 (0.51)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa07)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-12-01</td><td>58818.9</td><td>791.5</td><td>20.71 (0.06)</td><td>20.42 (0.03)</td><td>20.44 (0.07)</td><td>20.26 (0.08)</td><td>20.00 (0.65)</td><td>20.72 (0.14)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-12-03</td><td>58820.8</td><td>793.4</td><td>20.20 (0.17)</td><td>19.81 (0.17)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa14)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-12-03</td><td>58820.9</td><td>793.5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>19.87 (0.15)</td><td>19.37 (0.13)</td><td>19.69 (0.19)</td><td>-</td><td>LCO (fa14)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-01-15</td><td>58863.8</td><td>836.4</td><td>20.79 (0.11)</td><td>20.54 (0.06)</td><td>20.58 (0.06)</td><td>20.32 (0.15)</td><td>20.43 (0.28)</td><td>20.87 (0.15)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-06-22</td><td>59022.2</td><td>994.8</td><td>20.98 (0.04)</td><td>20.77 (0.06)</td><td>20.65 (0.13)</td><td>20.52 (0.15)</td><td>21.04 (0.11)</td><td>21.40 (0.27)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-07-25</td><td>59055.1</td><td>1027.7</td><td>20.95 (0.07)</td><td>20.62 (0.07)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-07-25</td><td>59055.2</td><td>1027.8</td><td>21.09 (0.07)</td><td>20.82 (0.05)</td><td>20.64 (0.12)</td><td>20.59 (0.09)</td><td>21.06 (0.09)</td><td>21.07 (0.2)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-08-21</td><td>59082.0</td><td>1054.6</td><td>21.02 (0.15)</td><td>20.77 (0.08)</td><td>20.70 (0.09)</td><td>20.62 (0.16)</td><td>21.04 (0.13)</td><td>21.22 (0.24)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-09-14</td><td>59106.0</td><td>1078.6</td><td>21.14 (0.05)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-09-14</td><td>59106.1</td><td>1078.7</td><td>21.15 (0.06)</td><td>20.90 (0.05)</td><td>20.73 (0.16)</td><td>20.53 (0.19)</td><td>21.07 (0.1)</td><td>21.34 (0.2)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-01-18</td><td>59232.8</td><td>1205.4</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>20.87 (0.11)</td><td>20.82 (0.1)</td><td>21.18 (0.14)</td><td>21.34 (0.25)</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-01-18</td><td>59232.9</td><td>1205.5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>21.22 (0.14)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-07-06</td><td>59401.2</td><td>1373.8</td><td>21.19 (0.15)</td><td>20.90 (0.21)</td><td>20.88 (0.21)</td><td>20.90 (0.23)</td><td>21.40 (0.22)</td><td>21.47 (0.29)</td><td>LRS (LRS)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-10-11</td><td>59498.1</td><td>1470.7</td><td>21.3 (0.05)</td><td>20.89 (0.13)</td><td>20.95 (0.13)</td><td>20.88 (0.12)</td><td>21.32 (0.11)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-11-12</td><td>59530.9</td><td>1503.5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>21.14 (0.13)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-11-13</td><td>59531.0</td><td>1503.6</td><td>21.41 (0.18)</td><td>20.85 (0.18)</td><td>-</td><td>21.01 (0.11)</td><td>21.26 (0.16)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-07-07</td><td>59767.2</td><td>1739.8</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>21.16 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-07-16</td><td>59776.2</td><td>1748.8</td><td>21.34 (0.27)</td><td>20.85 (0.24)</td><td>21.04 (0.2)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-08-23</td><td>59814.2</td><td>1786.8</td><td>21.41 (0.08)</td><td>20.92 (0.13)</td><td>21.18 (0.11)</td><td>-</td><td>21.40 (0.15)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-09-22</td><td>59844.0</td><td>1816.6</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>20.99 (0.11)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-10-20</td><td>59872.9</td><td>1845.5</td><td>21.20 (0.12)</td><td>20.86 (0.11)</td><td>21.03 (0.12)</td><td>20.89 (0.18)</td><td>21.33 (0.15)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table A.2.** Swift photometry (Vega magnitudes).</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch<br>(d)</th><th>UVW2 (err)</th><th>UVM2 (err)</th><th>UVW1 (err)</th><th>U (err)</th><th>B (err)</th><th>V (err)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-10-28</td><td>58054.4</td><td>27.0</td><td>12.48 (0.04)</td><td>12.32 (0.04)</td><td>12.40 (0.04)</td><td>12.70 (0.04)</td><td>13.97 (0.04)</td><td>13.93 (0.05)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-10-30</td><td>58056.1</td><td>28.7</td><td>12.52 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>12.40 (0.04)</td><td>12.68 (0.04)</td><td>13.90 (0.04)</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-04</td><td>58061.0</td><td>33.6</td><td>12.59 (0.04)</td><td>12.39 (0.04)</td><td>12.41 (0.04)</td><td>12.58 (0.04)</td><td>13.80 (0.04)</td><td>13.78 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-05</td><td>58062.5</td><td>35.1</td><td>-</td><td>12.42 (0.04)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-05</td><td>58062.8</td><td>35.4</td><td>12.62 (0.04)</td><td>12.41 (0.04)</td><td>12.43 (0.04)</td><td>12.58 (0.04)</td><td>13.77 (0.04)</td><td>13.72 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-10</td><td>58067.7</td><td>40.3</td><td>12.78 (0.04)</td><td>12.54 (0.04)</td><td>12.52 (0.04)</td><td>12.60 (0.04)</td><td>13.75 (0.04)</td><td>13.69 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-16</td><td>58073.5</td><td>46.1</td><td>12.97 (0.04)</td><td>12.78 (0.04)</td><td>12.67 (0.04)</td><td>12.66 (0.04)</td><td>13.75 (0.04)</td><td>13.65 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-19</td><td>58076.6</td><td>49.2</td><td>13.12 (0.04)</td><td>12.89 (0.04)</td><td>12.78 (0.04)</td><td>12.69 (0.04)</td><td>13.73 (0.04)</td><td>13.60 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-22</td><td>58079.6</td><td>52.2</td><td>13.27 (0.04)</td><td>13.03 (0.04)</td><td>12.89 (0.04)</td><td>12.72 (0.04)</td><td>13.78 (0.04)</td><td>13.62 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-30</td><td>58087.6</td><td>60.2</td><td>13.76 (0.04)</td><td>13.49 (0.04)</td><td>13.29 (0.04)</td><td>12.94 (0.04)</td><td>13.82 (0.04)</td><td>13.65 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-04</td><td>58091.6</td><td>64.2</td><td>14.02 (0.05)</td><td>13.75 (0.05)</td><td>13.48 (0.04)</td><td>13.10 (0.04)</td><td>13.93 (0.04)</td><td>13.72 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-09</td><td>58096.1</td><td>68.7</td><td>14.33 (0.05)</td><td>14.05 (0.05)</td><td>13.74 (0.04)</td><td>13.24 (0.04)</td><td>13.98 (0.04)</td><td>13.71 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-12</td><td>58099.3</td><td>71.9</td><td>14.55 (0.05)</td><td>14.27 (0.05)</td><td>13.89 (0.05)</td><td>13.38 (0.04)</td><td>14.04 (0.04)</td><td>13.75 (0.04)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A.3.** Near-infrared photometry.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>J (err)</th><th>H (err)</th><th>Ks (err)</th><th>Telescope (Instrument)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-11-10</td><td>58067.2</td><td>39.8</td><td>13.08 (0.14)</td><td>13.06 (0.17)</td><td>12.69 (0.09)</td><td>NTT (SOFI)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-26</td><td>58083.0</td><td>55.6</td><td>12.85 (0.25)</td><td>13.09 (0.14)</td><td>12.71 (0.4)</td><td>NTT (SOFI)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-14</td><td>58101.1</td><td>73.7</td><td>12.95 (0.15)</td><td>13.05 (0.27)</td><td>12.33 (0.13)</td><td>NTT (SOFI)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-03</td><td>58121.9</td><td>94.5</td><td>13.25 (0.13)</td><td>13.19 (0.12)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-06</td><td>58124.0</td><td>96.6</td><td>13.14 (0.16)</td><td>12.79 (0.24)</td><td>12.34 (0.15)</td><td>NTT (SOFI)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-19</td><td>58349.2</td><td>321.8</td><td>15.55 (0.14)</td><td>14.83 (0.19)</td><td>13.90 (0.14)</td><td>NTT (SOFI)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-09-04</td><td>58365.1</td><td>337.7</td><td>15.62 (0.23)</td><td>14.80 (0.25)</td><td>13.09 (0.14)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-03</td><td>58425.9</td><td>398.5</td><td>16.19 (0.19)</td><td>15.03 (0.21)</td><td>13.89 (0.11)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-22</td><td>58686.2</td><td>658.8</td><td>18.44 (0.18)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-18</td><td>58713.1</td><td>685.7</td><td>18.56 (0.18)</td><td>16.90 (0.21)</td><td>15.23 (0.21)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-10-05</td><td>58761.0</td><td>733.6</td><td>19.09 (0.24)</td><td>17.16 (0.26)</td><td>15.29 (0.15)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-06-25</td><td>59025.2</td><td>997.8</td><td>20.18 (0.33)</td><td>18.65 (0.23)</td><td>16.76 (0.12)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-07-17</td><td>59047.1</td><td>1019.7</td><td>20.61 (0.35)</td><td>18.78 (0.38)</td><td>-</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-07-17</td><td>59047.2</td><td>1019.8</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>16.85 (0.1)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-12-16</td><td>59199.9</td><td>1172.5</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>17.44 (0.14)</td><td>NOT (NOTCAM)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table A.4.** NEOWISE photometry.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>W1 (err)</th><th>W2 (err)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-12-01</td><td>58088.7</td><td>61.3</td><td>12.814 (0.009)</td><td>12.688 (0.020)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-18</td><td>58287.0</td><td>259.6</td><td>13.744 (0.019)</td><td>12.720 (0.034)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-27</td><td>58449.4</td><td>422.0</td><td>13.020 (0.010)</td><td>12.436 (0.019)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-17</td><td>58651.2</td><td>623.8</td><td>13.362 (0.014)</td><td>12.584 (0.014)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-26</td><td>58813.4</td><td>786.0</td><td>13.742 (0.022)</td><td>12.697 (0.026)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-06-18</td><td>59018.4</td><td>991.0</td><td>14.230 (0.030)</td><td>13.10 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-11-27</td><td>59180.6</td><td>1153.2</td><td>14.555 (0.023)</td><td>13.315 (0.032)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-06-17</td><td>59382.7</td><td>1355.3</td><td>14.93 (0.05)</td><td>13.72 (0.16)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-11-26</td><td>59544.9</td><td>1517.5</td><td>14.932 (0.015)</td><td>13.79 (0.04)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A.5.** Log of optical spectroscopic observations of SN 2017hcc.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>Exposure time (s)</th><th>Slit width</th><th>Wavelength range (Å)</th><th>Telescope (instrument, grism)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-10-07</td><td>58033.4</td><td>6</td><td>900</td><td>2.0"</td><td>5000-9500</td><td>FTS (FLOYDS, red/blue)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-01</td><td>58058.9</td><td>31.5</td><td>300</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-09</td><td>58066.2</td><td>38.8</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-09</td><td>58066.2</td><td>38.8</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-27</td><td>58071.8</td><td>44.4</td><td>1800</td><td>250 µm</td><td>3300-7000</td><td>Asiago 1.22m (B&C, 300tr)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-17</td><td>58075.0</td><td>47.6</td><td>420</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-27</td><td>58083.9</td><td>56.5</td><td>1800</td><td>200 µm</td><td>3300-7000</td><td>Asiago 1.22m (B&C, 300tr)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-27</td><td>58084.1</td><td>56.7</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-27</td><td>58084.1</td><td>56.7</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-04</td><td>58090.8</td><td>63.4</td><td>1800</td><td>200 µm</td><td>3300-7000</td><td>Asiago 1.22m (B&C, 300tr)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-06</td><td>58094.0</td><td>66.6</td><td>420</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-11</td><td>58096.8</td><td>69.4</td><td>1800</td><td>200 µm</td><td>3300-7000</td><td>Asiago 1.22m (B&C, 300tr)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-13</td><td>58100.1</td><td>72.7</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-13</td><td>58100.1</td><td>72.7</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-21</td><td>58107.7</td><td>80.3</td><td>1200</td><td>250 µm</td><td>3300-7000</td><td>Asiago 1.22m (B&C, 300tr)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-28</td><td>58115.9</td><td>88.5</td><td>600</td><td>0.9"</td><td>6330-6870</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #17)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-29</td><td>58116.8</td><td>89.4</td><td>420</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-14</td><td>58132.0</td><td>104.6</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-01-14</td><td>58132.1</td><td>104.7</td><td>600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-05-20</td><td>58258.4</td><td>231.0</td><td>900</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-05-20</td><td>58258.4</td><td>231.0</td><td>900</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-27</td><td>58296.2</td><td>268.8</td><td>900</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-30</td><td>58299.3</td><td>271.9</td><td>1500</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-06-30</td><td>58299.3</td><td>271.9</td><td>1500</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-13</td><td>58312.2</td><td>284.8</td><td>900</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-07-24</td><td>58323.1</td><td>295.7</td><td>900</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-04</td><td>58334.2</td><td>306.8</td><td>1200</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-08</td><td>58338.2</td><td>310.8</td><td>1200</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-11</td><td>58341.1</td><td>313.7</td><td>1800</td><td>1.69"</td><td>3300-9300</td><td>Asiago 1.82m (AFOSC, VPH6+VPH7)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-08-27</td><td>58357.1</td><td>329.7</td><td>1200</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-01</td><td>58392.1</td><td>364.7</td><td>2000</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-10-18</td><td>58409.0</td><td>381.6</td><td>1900</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-11-13</td><td>58436.0</td><td>408.6</td><td>2400</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-04</td><td>58456.5</td><td>429.1</td><td>3600</td><td>2.0"</td><td>5400-10000</td><td>FTS (FLOYDS, red)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-06</td><td>58459.0</td><td>431.6</td><td>2400</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-12-28</td><td>58480.9</td><td>453.5</td><td>2400</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-05-13</td><td>58616.4</td><td>589.0</td><td>3600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3380-7520</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#11)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-05-14</td><td>58617.4</td><td>590.0</td><td>3600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>6015-10320</td><td>NTT (EFOSC, Gr#16)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-06-13</td><td>58647.2</td><td>619.8</td><td>3600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-20</td><td>58684.1</td><td>656.7</td><td>3600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-28</td><td>58692.2</td><td>664.8</td><td>2373</td><td>-</td><td>4700-9400</td><td>VLT (MUSE, -)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-07-30</td><td>58694.2</td><td>666.8</td><td>3380</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-05</td><td>58700.2</td><td>672.8</td><td>3000</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-08-20</td><td>58715.2</td><td>687.8</td><td>3600</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-11-17</td><td>58804.9</td><td>777.5</td><td>3600</td><td>1.3"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2019-12-01</td><td>58819.0</td><td>791.6</td><td>3600</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3200-9600</td><td>NOT (ALFOSC, #4)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-07-02</td><td>59032.2</td><td>1004.8</td><td>1500x2</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3630-7500</td><td>GTC (OSIRIS, R1000B)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-10-12</td><td>59125.0</td><td>1107.6</td><td>1432, 1800</td><td>1.5"</td><td>3000-8430</td><td>TNG (DOLORES, LR-B)</td></tr><tr><td>2020-12-17</td><td>59200.8</td><td>1173.4</td><td>1800x2</td><td>1.5"</td><td>3000-8430</td><td>TNG (DOLORES, LR-B)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-07-06</td><td>59401.1</td><td>1373.7</td><td>1800x2</td><td>1.5"</td><td>3000-8430</td><td>TNG (DOLORES, LR-B)</td></tr><tr><td>2021-09-09</td><td>59466.0</td><td>1438.6</td><td>1800x2</td><td>1.0"</td><td>3000-8430</td><td>TNG (DOLORES, LR-B)</td></tr><tr><td>2022-08-01</td><td>59792.2</td><td>1764.8</td><td>1800x2</td><td>1.0"</td><td>5100-10000</td><td>GTC (OSIRIS, R1000R)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table><caption>**Table A.6.** Log of NIR spectroscopic observations of SN 2017hcc.</caption><thead><tr><th>Date</th><th>MJD</th><th>Epoch (d)</th><th>Exposure time (s)</th><th>Slit width</th><th>Wavelength range (μm)</th><th>Telescope (instrument, grism)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>2017-11-10</td><td>58067.2</td><td>39.8</td><td>960</td><td>1.0"</td><td>0.95-1.64</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GB)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-10</td><td>58067.2</td><td>39.8</td><td>1500</td><td>1.0"</td><td>1.53-2.52</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GR)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-26</td><td>58083.1</td><td>55.7</td><td>2880</td><td>1.0"</td><td>0.95-1.64</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GB)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-11-26</td><td>58083.1</td><td>55.7</td><td>4500</td><td>1.0"</td><td>1.53-2.52</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GR)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-11</td><td>58098.2</td><td>70.8</td><td>4191</td><td>0.5"</td><td>0.8-2.4</td><td>IRTF (SpeX, ShortXD)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-14</td><td>58101.0</td><td>73.6</td><td>960</td><td>1.0"</td><td>0.95-1.64</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GB)</td></tr><tr><td>2017-12-14</td><td>58101.1</td><td>73.7</td><td>1500</td><td>1.0"</td><td>1.53-2.52</td><td>NTT (SOFI, GR)</td></tr><tr><td>2018-09-06</td><td>58367.3</td><td>339.9</td><td>719</td><td>0.5"</td><td>0.7-2.5</td><td>IRTF (SpeX, Prism)</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table A.7.** Comparison objects.</caption><thead><tr><th>Name</th><th>Right ascension</th><th>Declination</th><th>Redshift</th><th>Source(s)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>SN 2010j1</td><td>09:42:53.330</td><td>+09:29:41.78</td><td>0.0107</td><td>Stoll et al. 2011; Patat et al. 2011; Smith et al. 2011; Andrews et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2012; Ofek et al. 2014; Fransson et al. 2014; Borish et al. 2015; Jencson et al. 2016; Li et al. 2022; Sarangi et al. 2018; Chugai 2018; Ofek et al. 2019; Bevan et al. 2020</td></tr><tr><td>SN 1998S</td><td>11:46:06.180</td><td>+47:28:55.49</td><td>0.0030</td><td>Leonard et al. 2000; Fassia et al. 2000, 2001; Pozzo et al. 2004; Fransson et al. 2005</td></tr><tr><td>SN 2005ip</td><td>09:32:06.420</td><td>+08:26:44.41</td><td>0.0072</td><td>Smith et al. 2009; Stritzinger et al. 2012</td></tr><tr><td>SN 2015da</td><td>13:52:24.110</td><td>+39:41:28.60</td><td>0.0067</td><td>Tartaglia et al. 2020</td></tr><tr><td>HSC16aayt (SN 2016jiu)</td><td>10:02:05.570</td><td>+02:57:58.30</td><td>0.6814</td><td>Moriya et al. 2019</td></tr><tr><td>PTF12glz</td><td>15:54:53.040</td><td>+03:32:07.50</td><td>0.0799</td><td>Soumagnac et al. 2019</td></tr></tbody></table>