# Effects of Toxoplasma gondii infection on cognition, symptoms, and response to digital cognitive training in schizophrenia

Anna Luiza Guimarães, David Richer Araujo Coelho, Linda Scoriels, Juliana

Mambrini, Lis Ribeiro Do Valle Antonelli, Priscilla Henriques, Andréa

Teixeira-Carvalho, Olindo Assis Martins Filho, José Mineo, Lilian

Bahia-Oliveira, et al.

► To cite this version:

Anna Luiza Guimarães, David Richer Araujo Coelho, Linda Scoriels, Juliana Mambrini, Lis Ribeiro Do Valle Antonelli, et al. Effects of Toxoplasma gondii infection on cognition, symptoms, and response to digital cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2022, 8, 10.1038/s41537-022-00292-2. hal-04933323

HAL Id: hal-04933323

https://hal.science/hal-04933323v1

Submitted on 6 Feb 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
ARTICLE **OPEN**

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

# Effects of *Toxoplasma gondii* infection on cognition, symptoms, and response to digital cognitive training in schizophrenia

Anna Luiza Guimarães<sup>1,2,6</sup>, David Richer Araujo Coelho<sup>3,6</sup>, Linda Scoriels<sup>1,2</sup>, Juliana Mambrini<sup>4</sup>, Lis Ribeiro do Valle Antonelli<sup>4</sup>, Priscilla Henriques<sup>4</sup>, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho<sup>4</sup>, Olindo Assis Martins Filho<sup>4</sup>, José Mineo<sup>5</sup>, Lilian Bahia-Oliveira<sup>1,3</sup> and Rogério Panizzutti<sup>1,2,6</sup>

Studies indicate that neuroscience-informed digital cognitive training can remediate cognitive impairments in schizophrenia, but the factors contributing to these deficits and response to treatment remain unclear. *Toxoplasma gondii* is a neuroinvasive parasite linked to cognitive decline that also presents a higher prevalence in schizophrenia. Here, we compared the cognition and symptom severity of IgG seropositive (TOXO+; *n* = 25) and seronegative (TOXO−; *n* = 35) patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial of digital cognitive training. At baseline, TOXO+ subjects presented lower global cognition than TOXO− (*F* = 3.78, *p* = 0.05). Specifically, TOXO+ subjects showed worse verbal memory and learning (*F* = 4.48, *p* = 0.03), social cognition (*F* = 5.71, *p* = 0.02), and higher antibody concentrations were associated with increased negative (*r* = 0.42, *p* = 0.04) and total (*r* = 0.40, *p* = 0.04) schizophrenia symptoms. After training, the TOXO+ group showed higher adherence to the intervention (χ² = 9.31, *p* = 0.03), but there were no differences in changes in cognition and symptoms between groups. These findings highlight the association between seropositivity to *T. gondii* and deteriorated cognition and symptoms in schizophrenia. Further research is needed to assess the specific efficacy of digital cognitive training on this population.

*Schizophrenia* (2022)8:104; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00292-2

## INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a complex debilitating neuropsychiatric disorder and its prevalence is estimated at approximately 1% of the world population<fnref n="1" />,². Subjects with schizophrenia present a large range of symptoms, which significantly impact their quality of life, and about 85% of them have some degree of cognitive impairment³. The domains commonly affected are speed of processing, attention, working memory, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition⁴,<fnref n="5" />. The antipsychotic medication improves the positive symptoms of the disorder, but they lack efficiency for the cognitive impairments⁶.

Neuroscience-informed digital cognitive training has shown effectiveness in remediating cognitive deficits in schizophrenia⁷⁻⁹. However, response to this type of intervention has large variability, with effect sizes ranging from small to medium size¹⁰. More recent reviews suggest that future trials keep exploring moderators of response to cognitive interventions in schizophrenia¹¹,¹², such as biological mechanisms associated with the disorder.

The etiology of schizophrenia remains relatively unknown, although several risk factors have been identified. For instance, infectious agents, such as *Toxoplasma gondii* (*T. gondii*), are environmental factors that significantly increase the risk of schizophrenia¹³. *T. gondii* is a neurotropic protozoan parasite, which infects approximately one-third of the global human population¹⁴, and may affect neural processing by forming cysts in the brain¹⁵. Meta-analyses have shown that subjects with schizophrenia are more likely to be seropositive for toxoplasmosis when compared with the general population (O.R. 2.73) (95% CI 2.10–3.60)¹⁶ and (OR

2.71) (95% CI 1.93–3.80)¹⁷. Seropositive subjects also show higher chances of dying of natural causes (O.R. 4.70) (95% CI 1.27–17.31)¹⁸. Additionally, studies have identified that women infected by *T. gondii* in their prenatal period present an increased risk of having offspring that will develop cognitive impairment and schizophrenia¹⁹. Moreover, children infected congenitally with *T. gondii* present lower IQ scores (93.2) compared with non-infected children of the same age (109.8)²⁰. The parasite has also been associated with psychomotor impairments in subjects without psychiatric disorders²¹ and learning and memory deficits in mice²².

It is not clear how *T. gondii* infection affects individuals with schizophrenia, especially in terms of cognitive impairment and specific clinical symptoms associated with the disorder. Studies indicate a relationship between startle latency response and IgG titers in schizophrenia subjects and healthy controls²³, and that toxoplasmosis in men with schizophrenia may lead to more severe negative and cognitive symptoms and a less favorable course of the disorder compared to non-infected male subjects²⁴. But many studies did not find a significant relationship between seropositivity and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia²⁵⁻²⁷. Additionally, a birth cohort found a positive association between *T. gondii* infection and the prevalence of mental disorders, but not specifically schizophrenia²⁸.

Considering the uncertain impact *T. gondii* infection may have on schizophrenia, we posed two questions: 1) Is *T. gondii* seropositivity associated with poorer cognitive performance and increased symptoms at baseline? 2) Could it result in different responses to neuroscience-informed digital cognitive training? To answer these questions, we measured antibody titers for *T. gondii* from individuals

<footnote n="1">¹Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ²Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ³Departamento de Imunoparasitologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ⁴Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. ⁶These authors contributed equally: Anna Luiza Guimarães, David Richer Araujo Coelho.</footnote>

<footnote>✉email: rogerio.panizzutti@ipub.ufrj.br</footnote>
with schizophrenia who participated in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 40 h of neuroscience-informed cognitive training⁷.

## RESULTS

### Baseline comparisons between TOXO+ and TOXO− schizophrenia subjects

Participants' baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Concerning the serological profile, 58.3% of participants were IgG-(TOXO- group, n = 35), 41.7% were IgG + (TOXO+ group, n = 25), and all participants were IgM-, confirming no current infection. The mean age of participants in the TOXO+ group was significantly higher than the mean age in the TOXO- group ($\chi^2$ = 4.09, $p$ = 0.04), and we also detected a trend towards significance for more years of education ($t$ = 1.70, $p$ = 0.09) and higher Intelligence Quotient ($t$ = 1.85, $p$ = 0.07) in the TOXO+ group when compared to the TOXO-. Given the association between the Socioeconomic Status (SES) and both exposure to *T. gondii*²⁹ and cognitive

performance³⁰, we measured this potentially confounding variable using the Social Development Index. We found no significant difference in the Social Development Index between TOXO+ and TOXO- groups ($\chi^2$ = 1.72, $p$ = 0.18).

Seropositivity to *T. gondii* and cognitive performance in schizophrenia. Baseline comparisons showed that TOXO+ subjects had significantly lower z-scores in attention, social and global cognition, and a trend towards significance for verbal memory and learning when compared to TOXO- subjects. After running a model including age as a covariate, differences between groups remained significant to social and global cognition, and the trend observed in the first analysis of verbal memory showed a significant p-value on the covariate model (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, after including age as a covariate the differences in attention were no longer significant. No significant group differences were found in Speed of Processing, Working Memory, Spatial Memory or Reasoning and Problem Solving (Table 1).

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Participants' baseline characteristics.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th rowspan="2">All subjects (n = 60)</th><th rowspan="2">TOXO- (n = 35)</th><th rowspan="2">TOXO+ (n = 25)</th><th colspan="2">Statistics</th></tr><tr><th>Uncorrected t or X<sup>2</sup> (p)<sup>a</sup></th><th>Age-corrected β or F (p)<sup>b</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Age (years)</td><td>42 (18–60)</td><td>36 (18–55)</td><td>45 (21–60)</td><td><strong>4.09 (0.04)</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female/male</td><td>18/44</td><td>10/27</td><td>8/17</td><td>0.17 (0.67)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Education (years)</td><td>12 (4–19)</td><td>12 (7–19)</td><td>12 (4–16)</td><td>1.70 (0.09)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>IQ</td><td>100 (13)</td><td>106 (13)</td><td>95 (13)</td><td>1.85 (0.07)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Years of Illness</td><td>14.5 (1–41)</td><td>13 (1–37)</td><td>18 (4–41)</td><td>-1.34 (0.19)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CPZ equivalent (mg)</td><td>332 (406)</td><td>332 (350)</td><td>319 (488)</td><td>0.01 (0.91)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Social Development Index</td><td>0.63 (0.10)</td><td>0.67 (0.10)</td><td>0.60 (0.10)</td><td>1.72 (0.18)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Baseline cognition (z-scores)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Speed of processing</td><td>-0.69 (2.28)</td><td>-0.37 (2.20)</td><td>-1.30 (2.37)</td><td>1.42 (0.23)</td><td>-0.19 (0.80)</td></tr><tr><td>Attention</td><td>-0.91 (1.41)</td><td>-0.76 (1.17)</td><td>-1.27 (1.56)</td><td><strong>2.41 (0.01)</strong></td><td>-0.55 (0.32)</td></tr><tr><td>Working memory</td><td>-0.34 (1.14)</td><td>-0.27 (1.25)</td><td>-0.54 (0.87)</td><td>1.63 (0.10)</td><td>1.91 (0.17)</td></tr><tr><td>Verbal memory and learning</td><td>-0.24 (1.15)</td><td>-0.13 (1.19)</td><td>-0.33 (0.97)</td><td>3.26 (0.07)</td><td><strong>4.48 (0.03)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Visual memory and learning</td><td>-1.45 (1.49)</td><td>-1.13 (1.35)</td><td>-1.87 (1.64)</td><td>1.22 (0.22)</td><td>0.17 (0.67)</td></tr><tr><td>Reasoning and problem solving</td><td>0.15 (0.69)</td><td>0.15 (0.61)</td><td>0.11 (0.80)</td><td>0.03 (0.85)</td><td>-0.00 (0.99)</td></tr><tr><td>Social cognition</td><td>-0.28 (0.72)</td><td>0.05 (0.74)</td><td>-0.63 (0.59)</td><td><strong>2.52 (0.01)</strong></td><td><strong>5.71 (0.02)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Global cognition</td><td>-0.70 (0.83)</td><td>-0.34 (0.78)</td><td>-1.00 (0.82)</td><td><strong>2.59 (0.01)</strong></td><td><strong>3.78 (0.05)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Baseline clinical measures (range)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HAM-D (0–54)</td><td>5 (5)</td><td>5 (5)</td><td>5 (6)</td><td>0.07 (0.78)</td><td>0.00 (1.00)</td></tr><tr><td>HAM-A (0–56)</td><td>4 (6)</td><td>5 (6)</td><td>4 (6)</td><td>0.13 (0.71)</td><td>1.00 (0.57)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Positive score (7–49)</td><td>13 (5)</td><td>13 (5)</td><td>13 (5)</td><td>0.00 (0.60)</td><td>0.19 (0.66)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Negative score (7–49)</td><td>15 (6)</td><td>16 (6)</td><td>15 (5)</td><td>0.98 (0.65)</td><td>0.32 (0.57)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS General score (16–112)</td><td>28 (7)</td><td>29 (6)</td><td>28 (7)</td><td>0.02 (0.49)</td><td>0.38 (0.53)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Total Score (30–210)</td><td>57 (14)</td><td>57 (15)</td><td>56 (13)</td><td>0.82 (0.49)</td><td>0.45 (0.50)</td></tr><tr><td>Serological profile</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><i>T. gondii</i> IgM titers<sup>c</sup></td><td></td><td>6.05 (2.45–65.7)</td><td>8.57 (2.66–64.6)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><i>T. gondii</i> IgG titers<sup>d</sup></td><td></td><td>5.66 (0.71–19.2)</td><td>89.60 (22.2–99.6)</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

<footnote><sup>a</sup>In the first column we compared TOXO+ and TOXO- groups using either t-test (two-tailed) for normal distributed variables (Years of illness, IQ and Education, Attention, working memory, spatial memory, social, and global cognition, PANSS Negative and Total) or Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test for non-normal distributions (Age, CPZ, Social Development Index, Speed of processing, verbal memory, reasoning and problem solving, HAM-A, HAM-D, PANSS Positive and General).</footnote>

<footnote><sup>b</sup>In the second column, General linear models were used to control for age within variables that respected homoscedasticity (Verbal Memory, Working Memory, Spatial Memory, Social Cognition, Global Cognition and all PANSS scores), and Quantile Regression was used to non-parametric models (Attention, Speed of Processing, Problem Solving, HAM-D and HAM-A).</footnote>

<footnote><sup>c</sup>Positive reference > 80.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>d</sup>Positive reference > 20.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>e</sup>IQ Intelligence quotient, CPZ Chlorpromazine, HAM-D Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>f</sup>Bold values show *p* values < 0.05.</footnote>

<footnote><sup>g</sup>Italic numbers trend towards significance.</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Differences in cognition between TOXO+ and TOXO- groups. The TOXO+ group had lower mean Z-scores in Verbal Memory (A), Social Cognition (B) and Global Cognition (C) when compared to the TOXO- group. Inserts show *F* and *p*-values of the general linear models using age as a covariate.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Spearman correlations between IgG Titers for *T. Gondii* in the TOXO+ group and PANSS Total and Negative. IgG titers were positively correlated to PANSS Total (A) and PANSS negative (B). Inserts shows *r* and *p* values of the spearman correlation (two-tailed). PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.</figcaption></figure>

We next asked whether the IgG titers would be associated with cognitive performance in the TOXO+ group. We only found a trend towards significance for social cognition (*r* = -0.39, *p* = 0.07) (Supplementary Table 1).

*Seropositivity to T. gondii and schizophrenia symptoms.* At baseline, no significant differences between TOXO+ and TOXO- groups were found for positive, negative, general, or total PANSS symptoms, nor for Hamilton Depression and Anxiety scales (Table 1). Then we studied the association between the concentration of antibodies against *T. gondii* and the intensity of schizophrenia symptoms and found significant associations between IgG titers and PANSS Negative (*r* = 0.42, *p* = 0.04) and total (*r* = 0.40, *p* = 0.04) scores (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 1). Since age and illness duration can impact symptom severity, we tested for associations between those two variables and IgG titers, and found no significant correlations (age: *r* = -0.28, *p* = 0.16; illness duration: *r* = -0.32, *p* = 0.22).

### Response to neuroscience-informed cognitive training in TOXO+ and TOXO- schizophrenia subjects

*Training adherence.* Of the 35 TOXO- individuals with schizophrenia assessed at baseline, 9 dropped out at the first stage of the intervention (25,7%), doing less than 20 h of training;

2 subjects left the intervention after 20 h of training (5,7%), and 24 completed 40 h of training (68,6%) (Supplementary Fig. 1). From the 25 TOXO+ individuals, 1 subject dropped out after 20 h of training (4%), and 24 subjects completed 40 h of training (96%). Chi-squared tests revealed significant differences between adherence to the intervention measured by the intervention stage accomplishment ($X^2$ = 6.92, *p* = 0.03).

Thereafter, to better understand the profile of the dropouts, we compared the subjects who completed (*n* = 42) and did not complete (*n* = 12) the digital cognitive training. We found that the subjects who dropped out of the intervention were significantly younger ($X^2$ = 4.25, *p* = 0.03), but no significant differences were found for sex, education, IQ, years of illness, or chlorpromazine equivalent (Supplementary Table 2). We also found that subjects who completed the intervention had higher z-scores at baseline in the social cognition composite than those who dropped out (*t* = 2.1, *p* = 0.03), even after including age as a covariate ($F$ = 1.99, *p* = 0.05). No significant difference was found for any other cognitive domain or clinical measure (Supplementary Table 2).

*Changes in cognition.* To study the association between *T. gondii* seropositivity and changes in cognition after digital cognitive training, we studied only subjects who completed the entire
<table><caption>**Table 2.** Baseline and endpoint cognitive and clinical data of the TOXO- and TOXO+ patients who completed the digital cognitive training.</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">TOXO- (n = 24)</th><th colspan="3">TOXO+ (n = 24)</th><th rowspan="2">Baseline comparison<br/>t or x<sup>2</sup> (p)<sup>a</sup></th><th rowspan="2">Changes' comparison</th></tr><tr><th>baseline<br/>Mean (SD)</th><th>endpoint</th><th>change</th><th>baseline</th><th>endpoint</th><th>change</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Cognition (z-scores)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Speed of processing</td><td>-1.2 (2.4)</td><td>-1.7 (2.5)</td><td>-0.5 (2.3)</td><td>-1.7 (2.4)</td><td>-1.6 (2.0)</td><td>-0.1 (1.9)</td><td>0.55 (0.5)</td><td>0.14 (0.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Attention</td><td>-1.0 (1.1)</td><td>-0.5 (0.9)</td><td>0.4 (0.7)</td><td>-1.8 (1.5)</td><td>-1.1 (1.3)</td><td>0.7 (1.1)</td><td><strong>2.10 (0.04)</strong></td><td>-0.81 (0.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Working memory</td><td>0.0 (1.1)</td><td>0.0 (0.7)</td><td>0.0 (0.8)</td><td>-0.5 (0.9)</td><td>-0.4 (1.0)</td><td>0.1 (0.8)</td><td><strong>1.81 (0.08)</strong></td><td>-0.42 (0.7)</td></tr><tr><td>Verbal memory and learning</td><td>0.1 (1.1)</td><td>0.0 (1.1)</td><td>-0.1 (0.9)</td><td>-0.4 (1.0)</td><td>-0.3 (1.0)</td><td>0.1 (0.7)</td><td><strong>1.79 (0.08)</strong></td><td>-0.85 (0.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Visual memory and learning</td><td>-1.5 (1.5)</td><td>-1.0 (1.7)</td><td>0.5 (1.4)</td><td>-1.8 (1.7)</td><td>1.4 (1.6)</td><td>0.4 (1.4)</td><td>0.54 (0.6)</td><td>0.22 (0.8)</td></tr><tr><td>Reasoning and problem solving</td><td>-0.1 (0.6)</td><td>0.3 (0.5)</td><td>0.4 (0.5)</td><td>-0.1 (0.8)</td><td>0.3 (0.3)</td><td>0.4 (0.7)</td><td>0.52 (0.46)</td><td>0.28 (0.6)</td></tr><tr><td>Social cognition</td><td>-0.3 (0.7)</td><td>-0.2 (0.7)</td><td>0.1 (0.4)</td><td>-0.6 (0.5)</td><td>-0.2 (0.7)</td><td>0.3 (0.6)</td><td>1.35 (0.18)</td><td>-1.23 (0.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Global cognition</td><td>-0.6 (0.7)</td><td>-0.5 (0.7)</td><td>0.1 (0.4)</td><td>-1.0 (0.8)</td><td>-0.7 (0.7)</td><td>0.3 (0.5)</td><td><strong>1.86 (0.07)</strong></td><td>-1.68 (0.1)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="10"><strong>Symptoms (raw data)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>HAM-D</td><td>6.5 (5.4)</td><td>4.9 (3.7)</td><td>-1.6 (5.0)</td><td>6.2 (5.4)</td><td>6.2 (5.0)</td><td>0.2 (4.2)</td><td>0.17 (0.8)</td><td>-1.03 (0.3)</td></tr><tr><td>HAM-A</td><td>6.6 (5.4)</td><td>5.6 (5.1)</td><td>-1.0 (6.5)</td><td>7.2 (6.9)</td><td>6.1 (6.3)</td><td>-1.1 (5.5)</td><td>-0.29 (0.7)</td><td>0.07 (0.9)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Positive</td><td>14.0 (4.9)</td><td>11.9 (4.9)</td><td>-1.5 (3.2)</td><td>13.4 (4.9)</td><td>10.3 (3.6)</td><td>-2.9 (3.5)</td><td>0.45 (0.6)</td><td>1.44 (0.1)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Negative</td><td>17.2 (6.6)</td><td>16.3 (7.9)</td><td>-0.5 (6.3)</td><td>14.3 (4.7)</td><td>14.2 (5.0)</td><td>-0.8 (4.7)</td><td>1.64 (0.1)</td><td>0.14 (0.9)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS General</td><td>29.7 (8.9)</td><td>26.2 (5.4)</td><td>-3.2 (7.0)</td><td>27.1 (5.4)</td><td>25.6 (6.4)</td><td>-1.5 (5.7)</td><td>1.20 (0.2)</td><td>-0.90 (0.3)</td></tr><tr><td>PANSS Total</td><td>61.0 (17.4)</td><td>54.4 (12.6)</td><td>-5.3 (11.8)</td><td>55.0 (12.1)</td><td>51.0 (9.8)</td><td>-4.4 (8.3)</td><td>1.36 (0.1)</td><td>-0.30 (0.7)</td></tr></tbody></table>

intervention (24 TOXO+ and 24 TOXO- subjects). In this reduced sample, there was no significant difference between groups in age, sex, education, IQ, years of illness, or chlorpromazine equivalent (Supplementary Table 3). Nevertheless, the TOXO+ group showed significantly lower z-scores in attention in comparison to the TOXO- (t = 2.10, *p* = 0.04). We also found trends towards significance for lower working memory, verbal memory and learning, and global cognition in the TOXO+ group (Table 2). The changes in cognition after training were similar between TOXO+ and TOXO- groups (Table 2).

*Changes in schizophrenia symptoms.* We compared the changes in schizophrenia symptoms measured by the PANSS scale, and in depressive and anxiety symptoms measured by the Hamilton Scale after digital cognitive training between TOXO+ and TOXO- subjects. We found no significant differences between groups on changes in clinical measures after training (Table 2).

*Differences in the sensory-modality trained.* Finally, we compared the TOXO+ and TOXO- subjects randomized to perform 40 h of either visual or auditory equivalent cognitive exercises, and additionally divided subjects into four groups: TOXO- visual (n = 11), TOXO+ visual (n = 13), TOXO- auditory (n = 13) and TOXO+ auditory (n = 11) training. Independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis tests showed that changes in cognition and symptoms after training did not significantly differ between groups (Supplementary Table 4).

## DISCUSSION

In this study, we explored the relationship between seropositivity to *T. gondii* and cognition and symptoms and their changes after digital neuroscience-informed cognitive training in subjects with schizophrenia. The main findings were that TOXO+ subjects presented worse global cognition, with impairments in social

cognition and verbal learning. Additionally, we found that TOXO+ subjects showed higher adherence to the digital cognitive training, although changes in cognition and symptoms after training were similar between groups.

We confirmed previous findings of an association between seropositivity to *T. gondii* and lower cognitive performance in schizophrenia subjects. *T. gondii* infection has been repeatedly associated with cognitive decline and other behavioral changes in humans<sup>21,31</sup>, and in animal studies<sup>22</sup>. Regarding its association with schizophrenia, two studies have found lower cognition in chronically infected male subjects with the same serological profile (*T. gondii* IgG+ and IgM-)<sup>24,32</sup>. It is noteworthy that the lower cognition presented by TOXO+ subjects in the present study was maintained after including age as a covariate, an essential step since age increases the probability of having previous contact with the parasite<sup>33</sup> and is axiomatically associated with cognitive decline.

The TOXO+ group presented higher adherence to treatment (96%) when compared to the TOXO- (68,6%), and subjects who dropped out were younger and had worse social cognition. A recent meta-analysis showed that training social cognition benefits people with schizophrenia on a variety of social-cognitive outcomes<sup>34</sup>. Also, it was found that the addition of social cognition training augmented the response to computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia<sup>35</sup>, while the social training alone was associated with gains in social functioning and motivation<sup>36</sup>. Similarly, we observed that baseline social cognition (and age) may impact the adherence to digital cognitive training in schizophrenia.

Despite the lower initial cognition in the TOXO+ group, improvement levels were surprisingly similar between groups after training. These findings contrast with a recent study supporting that worst cognitive performance at baseline predicts larger improvement after digital cognitive training<sup>37</sup>. Here, we showed that TOXO+ subjects were able to highly adhere to the

<footnote><sup>a</sup>Kruskal Wallis equality-of-populations rank test was used to compare speed of processing and reasoning and problem-solving z-scores, which did not present normal distribution. All the other variables had normal data distribution and were compared using a t-test (two-tailed). *HAM-D* Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, *HAM-A* Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, *PANSS* Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Bold values show *p* values < 0.05.</footnote>

<footnote>Italic numbers trend towards significance.</footnote>
intervention and improve their cognition after 40 h of digital
cognitive training.

Unexpectedly, we did not find differences between TOXO+ and
TOXO- subjects in schizophrenia symptoms. It has been
evidenced that *T. gondii* infection is associated with psychiatric
symptoms such as suicide attempts in younger schizophrenia
subjects³⁸. Similarly, a previous study found that TOXO+ subjects
with schizophrenia presented higher PANSS negative scores,
including two specific symptoms (delusion and alogia)²⁷. Note-
worthy, we found a positive association between IgG titers in the
TOXO+ group and schizophrenia symptoms (PANSS Negative and
Total scores). This result contrasts with a previous study that found
an association between lower IgG titers and higher PANSS
positive, negative, and disorganized psychopathology scores³².
However, the higher levels of exposure and the greatest genetic
diversity of *T. gondii* strains in Brazil, in comparison with Europe
and United States³², must be considered when comparing *T.
gondii* antibody titers from Brazilian cohorts to others. In fact, high
rates of exposure and reinfection in Brazil can cause the elevation
and maintenance of high anti-*T. gondii* IgG titers³⁹⁻⁴².

Furthermore, we investigated the impact of the sensory
modality trained on the response to treatment, comparing the
changes in cognition and symptoms between TOXO+ and TOXO-
subjects randomized to either visual or auditory equivalent
cognitive exercises. The crucially decreased sample size in this
analysis probably prevented finding any potentially significant
differences between groups. In a prior report, our research group
specifically explored the differences between visual and auditory
exercises in a larger sample of schizophrenia subjects and found
that both sensory modalities were effective, but in different ways:
the visual group had broader cognitive gains and symptoms
improvement than the auditory one⁷, and the auditory group
appeared to be more efficacious in the enhancement of emotion
processing and social cognition⁴³.

The underlying mechanisms of the association between *T. gondii* seropositivity and cognitive and behavioral alterations remain relatively unknown⁴⁴. A possible biological explanation is an immune-mediation response by proinflammatory biomarkers⁴⁵,⁴⁶. *T. gondii* is the infectious agent most associated with cognitive impairment in subjects with schizophrenia¹³. Its mechanisms involve dysregulation in dopamine metabolism⁴⁷,⁴⁸, glutamate synaptic neurotransmission⁴⁹, such as dysfunction in NMDA receptor (NMDAR) with a production of NMDAR antagonist and immune cross-reactions with the receptor⁵⁰⁻⁵⁴. These brain alterations seem to be related to cognitive impairment, as demonstrated by a study showing that individuals seropositive for both *T. gondii* and NMDAR antibodies had a decreased performance on the delayed memory module of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)⁵⁵.

Considering that *T. gondii* infection has been repeatedly
associated with schizophrenia⁵⁶, animals infected by *T. gondii*
have been used as models to further understand the pathophy-
siology of schizophrenia⁴⁹. Our research group recently observed
severe neural damage induced by chronic infection of C57Bl/6
mice with the ME-49 *T. gondii* strain, with reduced glutamate and
D-serine levels in prefrontal cortical and hippocampal tissue
homogenates⁵⁷. Other murine studies have shown that the
parasite induces impairments in learning and memory, and
more particularly in short-term social recognition memory⁵⁸. It
has also been demonstrated that *T. gondii* may lead to changes in
behavior, leading animals to feel attracted, rather than repulsed by
their predators⁵⁹.

*T. gondii* transmission can occur in many ways (i.e., consuming water contaminated with oocysts), and its prevention consists mostly of hygienic-sanitary measures⁶⁰. Since better socioeconomic status is associated with better cognition³⁰, it is important to analyze determinants of socioeconomic vulnerability that are

associated with exposure to the parasite²⁹. Here, we analyzed the
Social Development Index, which includes indicators such as
sanitation and housing quality, and observed no significant
difference between the TOXO+ and TOXO- groups. Thus, we
confirmed that the differences in cognition between TOXO+ and
TOXO- subjects are likely not to be explained by differences in
socioeconomic status.

Limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size ($n = 60$), especially after the intervention ($n = 48$). We had a 20% dropout rate after 40 h of digital cognitive training, which occurred almost exclusively in the TOXO- group (18%), limiting our conclusions on the effects of the intervention. The dropouts were younger TOXO- subjects with lower social cognition. This issue could be addressed in future studies by including targeted social-cognitive training and selecting a dosage of training that would be more engaging to younger individuals with schizophrenia. Moreover, we did not control for the parasite strains. Given that the *T. gondii* population in Brazil is highly diverse, and that its prevalence is different depending on the geographic location⁶¹, a national multi-sample study would be necessary to compare cognitive impairment in subjects with schizophrenia caused by distinct strains of the parasite in different regions of Brazil.

In conclusion, the present findings highlight the association
between *T. gondii* infection and worse cognition in subjects with
schizophrenia. Despite the lower cognitive performance at base-
line, seropositivity was associated with higher adherence to the
digital cognitive training and similar changes in cognition and
symptoms after training. These findings highlight the potential of
digital cognitive training to remediate cognition in schizophrenia
individuals seropositive to *T. gondii*.

METHODS

Participants

Individuals with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited in the context of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on neuroscience-informed digital cognitive training (details of the study are fully described in our previous publication⁷). Subjects were recruited from the day-hospital and outpatient clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB) at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) from September 2013 to December 2016.

Participants were included if they were between 18 and
60 years of age, had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffecti-
tive disorder, had an IQ above 80⁶², were clinically stable, and had
an outpatient status for at least one month before starting the
intervention. Participants were excluded if they were illiterate, or
had any history of another psychiatric diagnosis, intellectual
disability, or brain damage. All participants signed a written
consent form after being informed about the study procedures.
The study was approved by the Brazilian National Committee of
Ethics in Research (12990013.0.0000,5263) and pre-registered at
ClinicalTrials.gov (1R03TW009002-01).

Study design

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-design study in which participants performed 40 h of auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed digital cognitive training. Blood samples were collected at baseline and cognitive functions and clinical symptoms were assessed at baseline and after 40 h of training. After the intervention, we divided participants into TOXO+ (IgG +) and TOXO- (IgG-) groups.

Assessments

*Cognition.* Seven cognitive domains have been defined as impaired in schizophrenia by the Measurement and Treatment
Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS). We used the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery recommended tests (MCCB) and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess speed of processing (Category Fluency (CF) and Reaction time (RTI) tests), attention (Rapid Visual Processing (RVP) test), working memory (digit backward (DB) and Spatial Working Memory (SWM) tests), verbal learning (Hopkins Verbal Learning Task (HVLT)), visual learning (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT)), reasoning and problem solving (Stocking Of Cambridge (SOC) test), and social cognition (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test – Managing emotions (MSCEIT). A fully detailed explanation of these tests can be found in previous studies<sup>63,64</sup>. Global cognition was a composite score calculated from the seven cognitive domain scores mentioned above.

**Symptoms.** The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)³⁷, and the Hamilton Depression⁶⁵ and Anxiety⁶⁶ rating scales were administered at baseline and after the intervention to assess participants' clinical status.

*Measurement of Socioeconomic Status (SES).* To measure socio-economic status, we used the Social Development Index⁶⁷, which analyzes the urban situation and the socio-economic status of the neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The index is calculated considering 4 indicators: access to basic sanitation (including adequate water supply, garbage collection, and sewage services), housing quality, degree of education, and the average income of each house. The result is the average of normalized values from these indicators, ranging from 0 to 1 (higher values indicate greater social development). Data was provided by Rio de Janeiro's city hall.

## Neuroscience-informed cognitive training

Participants were required to practice the neuroscience-informed cognitive training exercises for 1 h daily, 3 to 5 times a week until they completed 40 h of training. The digital cognitive training consisted of two groups (auditory and visual) of six exercises that trained speed processing, attention, memory, working memory, executive function, and social cognition in the selected perceptual modality. The two groups' exercises had equivalent task dynamics and were conceived to adapt their difficulty levels according to participants' performance⁸. An algorithm was used to maintain performance at rates of 80% of success, in order to keep participants engaged in the task and correct responses were rewarded through sounds, fireworks, and the accumulation of stars. Further details about the cognitive training exercises are described in Scoriels et al. 2020. The exercises were provided by *Posit Science, Inc.* (www.brainhq.com).

## T. gondii antibody levels measurement

Venous blood samples were collected from subjects selected at baseline and stored at -80 °C until analysis. *T. gondii* tachyzoite (RH strain) suspension was prepared following instructions described in⁶⁸. To assess immunoglobulin production, fixed *T. gondii* tachyzoites were used in a flow cytometry-based assay. IgM and IgG titers were measured in the 1:16000 dilution with a cutoff of 80% for IgM and 20% for IgG, and experiments were performed in 96-well plates with a slightly modified protocol compared with the one described in⁶⁸. More detailed information regarding blood collection and processing, tachyzoite preparation, and immuno-fluorescence by flow cytometry can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

## Data analysis

The distributions of demographic, cognitive, and clinical data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk Test. First, we compared the TOXO+ and TOXO- groups at baseline using Independent Samples t-tests (two-tailed) or Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, depending on the normality and homogeneity of distributions. Since age was significantly different between groups at baseline, we included this variable as a covariate using General Linear Models when the assumptions were met (i.e., homoscedasticity and normality of the residuals), and Quantile Regression Models⁶⁹ when those assumptions were not met. Next, we conducted Spearman correlations in the TOXO+ group at baseline to test the association between the IgG titers to *T. gondii* and cognition and schizophrenia symptoms.

We further performed a Chi-square test to compare the adherence to the intervention between TOXO+ and TOXO- subjects. In the post-intervention analysis, we only included subjects who completed the cognitive training. We retested the normality of data distributions with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and differences in baseline characteristics, as well as changes in cognition and symptoms (endpoint minus baseline scores) using Independent Samples t-tests (two-tailed) or Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test. To answer whether the sensory-modality training had an impact on patients' responses, we performed Kruskal Wallis comparisons between the four groups (TOXO+ visual, TOXO- visual, TOXO+ auditory, and TOXO- auditory). We also compared participants who completed and did not complete the intervention testing for differences in demographic, cognitive, and clinical data using Independent Samples t-tests (two-tailed) or Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test.

We used participants' neuropsychological tests z-scores or z-score change (further details are described in our previous publication⁷, and the raw data of the clinical scales. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (28.0 version) and STATA (Version 8.0) Software, with a statistical significance level set at *p* < 0.05.

## DATA AVAILABILITY

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Received: 16 December 2021; Accepted: 28 June 2022; Published online: 25 November 2022

## REFERENCES

1. Saha, S., Chant, D., Welham, J. & McGrath, J. A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia. *PLoS Med.* **2**, e141 (2005).

2. Tandon, R., Keshavan, M. & Nasrallah, H. Schizophrenia, "Just the Facts" What we know in 2008. 2. Epidemiology and etiology. *Schizophr. Res.* **102**, 1–18 (2008).

3. Ritsner, M. S. Predicting quality of life impairment in chronic schizophrenia from cognitive variables. *Qual. Life Res.* **16**, 929–937 (2007).

4. Reichenberg, A. et al. Premorbid intellectual functioning and risk of schizophrenia and spectrum disorders. *J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol.* **28**, 193–207 (2006).

5. Nuechterlein, K. H. et al. The MATRICS Consensus cognitive battery, Part 1: Test selection, reliability, and validity. *Am. J. Psychiatry.* **165**, 203–213 (2008).

6. Keefe, R. S. E. Should cognitive impairment be included in the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia? *World Psychiatry* **7**, 22–28 (2008).

7. Scoriels, L. et al. Auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training in schizophrenia: Effects on cognition, symptoms and quality of life. *Schizophr. Res.* **222**, 319–326 (2020).

8. Fisher, M., Holland, C., Merzenich, M. M. & Vinogradov, S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. *Am. J. Psychiatry.* **166**, 805–811 (2009).

9. Loewy, R. et al. Intensive auditory cognitive training improves verbal memory in adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis. *Schizophr. Bull.* **42**, S118–S126 (2016).
10. Wykes, T., Huddy, V., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R. & Czobor, P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: Methodology and effect sizes. *Am. J. Psychiatry* **168**, 472–485 (2011).

11. Dondé, C., Mondino, M., Brunelin, J. & Haesebaert, F. Sensory-targeted cognitive training for schizophrenia. *Expert Rev. Neurother.* **19**, 211–225 (2019).

12. Harvey, P. D., McGurk, S. R., Mahncke, H. & Wykes, T. Controversies in computerized cognitive training. *Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging.* **3**, 907–915 (2018).

13. Yolken, R. H. & Torrey, E. F. Are some cases of psychosis caused by microbial agents? A review of the evidence. *Mol. Psychiatry.* **13**, 470–479 (2008).

14. Webster, J. P. Rats, cats, people and parasites: The impact of latent toxoplasmosis on behaviour. *Microbes Infect.* **3**, 1037–1045 (2001).

15. Feustel, S. M., Meissner, M. & Liesenfeld, O. *Toxoplasma gondii* and the blood-brain barrier. *Virulence.* **3**, 182–192 (2012).

16. Torrey, E. F., Bartko, J. J., Lun, Z.-R. & Yolken, R. H. Antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in patients with schizophrenia: A *META-ANALYSIS*. *Schizophr. Bull.* **33**, 729–736 (2007).

17. Torrey, E. F., Bartko, J. J. & Yolken, R. H. Toxoplasma gondii and other risk factors for schizophrenia: An update. *Schizophr. Bull.* **38**, 642–647 (2012).

18. Dickerson, F., Boronow, J., Stallings, C., Origoni, A. & Yolken, R. H. Toxoplasma gondii in individuals with schizophrenia: Association with clinical and demographic factors and with mortality. *Schizophr. Bull.* **33**, 737–740 (2007).

19. Brown, A. S. et al. Maternal exposure to toxoplasmosis and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. *Am. J. Psychiatry.* **162**, 767–773 (2005).

20. Saxon, S. A., Knight, W., Reynolds, D. W., Stagno, S. & Alford, C. A. Intellectual deficits in children born with subclinical congenital toxoplasmosis: A preliminary report. *J. Pediatr.* **82**, 792–797 (1973).

21. Havlíček, J., Gašová, Z., Smith, A. P., Zvára, K. & Flegr, J. Decrease of psychomotor performance in subjects with latent 'asymptomatic' toxoplasmosis. *Parasitology.* **122**, 515–520 (2001).

22. Zhou, Y. H. et al. Impairment of learning and memory ability in mice with latent infection of Toxoplasma gondii. *Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi* **5**, 333–338 (2011).

23. Pearce, B. D. et al. Toxoplasma gondii exposure affects neural processing speed as measured by acoustic startle latency in schizophrenia and controls. *Schizophr. Res.* **150**, 258–261 (2013).

24. Esshili, A. et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in schizophrenia and associated clinical features. *Psychiatry Res.* **245**, 327–332 (2016).

25. Campos-Carli, S. Mde et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection and chronic schizophrenia: is there any association? *Arch. Clin. Psychiatry São Paulo.* **44**, 145–148 (2017).

26. Dickerson, F. et al. Antibodies to *Toxoplasma gondii* in individuals with mania. *Bipolar Disord.* **16**, 129–136 (2014).

27. Fond, G. et al. Latent toxoplasma infection in real-world schizophrenia: Results from the national FACE-SZ cohort. *Schizophr. Res.* **201**, 373–380 (2018).

28. Sugden, K. et al. Is Toxoplasma Gondii infection related to brain and behavior impairments in humans? Evidence from a population-representative birth cohort. *PLOS ONE* **11**, e0148435 (2016).

29. Mareze, M. et al. Socioeconomic vulnerability associated to Toxoplasma gondii exposure in southern Brazil. *PLOS ONE* **14**, e0212375 (2019).

30. Farah, M. J. The neuroscience of socioeconomic status: Correlates, causes, and consequences. *Neuron* **96**, 56–71 (2017).

31. Yolken, R. H., Dickerson, F. B. & Fuller Torrey, E. Toxoplasma and schizophrenia: Toxoplasma and schizophrenia. *Parasite Immunol.* **31**, 706–715 (2009).

32. Holub, D. et al. Differences in onset of disease and severity of psychopathology between toxoplasmosis-related and toxoplasmosis-unrelated schizophrenia. *Acta. Psychiatr. Scand.* **127**, 227–238 (2013).

33. Morais, R. D. A. P. B. et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with *T. gondii* infection in pregnant individuals from a Brazilian Amazon municipality. *Parasite Epidemiol. Control.* **9**, e0133 (2020).

34. Yeo, H., Yoon, S., Lee, J., Kurtz, M. M. & Choi, K. A meta-analysis of the effects of social-cognitive training in schizophrenia: The role of treatment characteristics and study quality. *Br. J. Clin. Psychol.* **61**, 37–57 (2022).

35. Lindenmayer, J. P. et al. Does social cognition training augment response to computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia? *Schizophr. Res.* **201**, 180–186 (2018).

36. Nahum, M. et al. A novel, online social cognitive training program for young adults with schizophrenia: A pilot study. *Schizophr. Res. Cogn.* **1**, e11–e19 (2014).

37. Harvey, P. D., Balzer, A. M. & Kotwicki, R. J. Training, engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study. *Schizophr. Res. Cogn.* **19**, 100150 (2019).

38. Okusaga, O. et al. Toxoplasma gondii antibody titers and history of suicide attempts in patients with schizophrenia. *Schizophr. Res.* **133**, 150–155 (2011).

39. Carneiro, A. C. et al. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii revealed highly diverse genotypes for isolates from newborns with congenital toxoplasmosis in southeastern Brazil. *J. Clin. Microbiol.* **51**, 901–907 (2013).

40. Mangiavacchi, B. M., Vieira, F. P., Bahia-Oliveira, L. M. & Hill, D. Salivary IgA against sporozoite-specific embryogenesis-related protein (TgERP) in the study of horizontally transmitted toxoplasmosis via T. gondii oocysts in endemic settings. *Epidemiol. Infect.* **144**, 2568–2577 (2016).

41. Milne, G., Webster, J. P. & Walker, M. Toward improving interventions against toxoplasmosis by identifying routes of transmission using sporozoite-specific serological tools. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* **71**, e686–e693 (2020).

42. Vieira, F. P. et al. Waterborne toxoplasmosis investigated and analysed under hydrogeological assessment: new data and perspectives for further research. *Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz.* **110**, 929–935 (2015).

43. Scoriels, L. et al. Changes in emotion processing and social cognition with auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training in individuals with schizophrenia. *Schizophr. Res.* **241**, 267–274 (2022).

44. de Haan, L., Sutterland, A., Schotborgh, J., Schirmbeck, F. & de Haan, L. Association of Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity with cognitive function in healthy people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. *JAMA Psychiatry* **78**, 1103–1112 (2021).

45. Fond, G., Lançon, C., Korchia, T., Auquier, P. & Boyer, L. The role of inflammation in the treatment of schizophrenia. *Front. Psychiatry* **11**, 160 (2020).

46. Müller, N. Inflammation in schizophrenia: Pathogenetic aspects and therapeutic considerations. *Schizophr. Bull.* **44**, 973–982 (2018).

47. Prandovszky, E. et al. The neurotropic parasite toxoplasma gondii increases dopamine metabolism. *PLoS ONE.* **6**, e23866, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023866 (2011).

48. Flegr, J. et al. Decreased level of psychobiological factor novelty seeking and lower intelligence in men latently infected with the protozoan parasite *Toxoplasma gondii* Dopamine, a missing link between schizophrenia and toxoplasmosis? *Biol. Psychiatry.* **63**, 253–268 (2003).

49. Kannan, G. & Pletnikov, M. V. Toxoplasma gondii and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: An animal model perspective. *Schizophr. Bull.* **38**, 1155–1161 (2012).

50. Huerta, P. T., Kowal, C., DeGiorgio, L. A., Volpe, B. T. & Diamond, B. Immunity and behavior: Antibodies alter emotion. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.* **103**, 678–683 (2006).

51. Lucchese, G. From Toxoplasmosis to Schizophrenia via NMDA Dysfunction: Peptide Overlap between Toxoplasma gondii and N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors As a Potential Mechanistic Link. *Front. Psychiatry.* **8**, 37 (2017).

52. Moghaddam, B. & Javitt, D. From revolution to evolution: The glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and its implication for treatment. *Neuropsychopharmacology.* **37**, 4–15 (2012).

53. Notarangelo, F. M. et al. Evaluation of kynurenine pathway metabolism in Toxoplasma gondii-infected mice: Implications for schizophrenia. *Schizophr. Res.* **152**, 261–267 (2014).

54. Schwarcz, R. & Hunter, C. A. Toxoplasma gondii and Schizophrenia: Linkage through astrocyte-derived kynurenine acid? *Schizophr. Bull.* **33**, 652–653 (2007).

55. Kannan, G. et al. Pathogen-mediated NMDA receptor autoimmunity and cellular barrier dysfunction in schizophrenia. *Transl. Psychiatry.* **7**, e1186–e1186 (2017).

56. Sutterland, A. L. et al. Beyond the association. Toxoplasma gondii in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and addiction: systematic review and meta-analysis. *Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica* **132**, 161–179 (2015).

57. Acquarone, M. et al. Social preference is maintained in mice with impaired startle reflex and glutamate/D-serine imbalance induced by chronic cerebral toxoplasmosis. *Sci. Rep.* **11**, 14029 (2021).

58. Worth, A. R., Andrew Thompson, R. C. & Lymbery, A. J. Reevaluating the Evidence for Toxoplasma gondii-induced behavioural changes in rodents. *Advances in Parasitology* **85**, 109–142 (2014).

59. Berdoy, M., Webster, J. P. & Macdonald, D. W. Fatal attraction in rats infected with *Toxoplasma gondii*. *Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.* **267**, 1591–1594 (2000).

60. Bahia-Oliveira, L., Gomez-Marin, J. & Shapiro, K. Toxoplasma gondii. J.B. Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros (eds), Water and Sanitation for the 21st Century: Health and Microbiological Aspects of Excreta and Wastewater Management (Global Water Pathogen Project). (R. Fayer and W. Jakubowski (eds), Part 3: Specific Excreted Pathogens: Environmental and Epidemiology Aspects - Section 3: Protists), Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO (2017).

61. Pena, H. F. J., Gennari, S. M., Dubey, J. P. & Su, C. Population structure and mouse-virulence of Toxoplasma gondii in Brazil. *Int. J. Parasitol.* **38**, 561–569 (2008).

62. Wechsler, D. *Wechsler adult intelligence scale - Fourth Edition Administration and Scoring Manual*. WAIS-IV, SanAntonio (2008).

63. Scoriels, L., Barnett, J. H., Soma, P. K., Sahakian, B. J. & Jones, P. B. Effects of modafinil on cognitive functions in first episode psychosis. *Psychopharmacology (Berl.* **220**, 249–258 (2012).
64. Scoriels, L. et al. Behavioural and molecular endophenotypes in psychotic disorders reveal heritable abnormalities in glutamatergic neurotransmission. *Transl. Psychiatry*, **5**, e540–e540 (2015).

65. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. *J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry* **23**, 56–62 (1960).

66. Hamilton, M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. *Br. J. Med. Psychol.* **32**, 50–55 (1959).

67. Cavallieri, F. Índice de desenvolvimento social – IDS: comparando as realidades microurbanas da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: IPP, **14** (2008).

68. Silva-dos-Santos, P. P. et al. Flow cytometry-based algorithm to analyze the anti-fixed Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites IgM and IgG reactivity and diagnose human acute toxoplasmosis. *J. Immunol. Methods.* **378**, 33–43 (2012).

69. Beyerlein, A. Quantile regression-opportunities and challenges from a user's perspective. *Am. J. Epidemiol.* **180**, 330–331 (2014).

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health – Fogarty International Center (Grant R03TW009002 to S.V. and R.P.); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) (Grant E-26/110.305/2014 to R.P.) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grant 400455/2012-9 to R.P.). R.P. is an Atlantic Fellow of the Global Brain Health Institute. L.S., L.G., L.M., S.K., A.G., P.R., F.T., and C.N. were supported by fellowships from FAPERJ and CNPq. The cognitive training software used in this study and all technical support were provided to us free of charge by Posit Science, Inc.

## AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

D.R.A.C., A.L.G., L.B., and R.P. were involved in the conception, drafting, and revising of the manuscript. L.S., L.B., and R.P. oversaw project development and provided data interpretation. J.M., D.R.A.C., and A.L.G. conducted all the statistical analyses. L.R.d.V.A., P.H., A.T., O.A.M.F., and J.M. assisted with serological tests and data interpretation. All authors revised and agreed upon the final version of the manuscript.

## COMPETING INTERESTS

R.P. is the founder of NeuroForma LTDA, a company with a financial interest in cognitive training. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

## ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

**Supplementary information** The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-022-00292-2.

**Correspondence** and requests for materials should be addressed to Rogério Panizzutti.

**Reprints and permission information** is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints

**Publisher's note** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons

Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,

adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022