# Direct Evidence of Dynamic Metal Support Interactions in Co/TiO2 Catalysts by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Davide Salusso, Canio Scarfiello, Anna Efimenko, Doan Pham Minh, P. Serp, Katerina Soulantica, Spyridon Zafeiratos

► To cite this version:

Davide Salusso, Canio Scarfiello, Anna Efimenko, Doan Pham Minh, P. Serp, et al.. Direct Evidence of Dynamic Metal Support Interactions in Co/TiO2 Catalysts by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13 (19), pp.2672. 10.3390/nano13192672. hal-04224403

HAL Id: hal-04224403

https://imt-mines-albi.hal.science/hal-04224403v1

Submitted on 2 Oct 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
Article

# Direct Evidence of Dynamic Metal Support Interactions in Co/TiO₂ Catalysts by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Davide Salusso <fnref n="1" />, Canio Scarfiello <fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="4" />, Anna Efimenko <fnref n="5" />,<fnref n="6" />, Doan Pham Minh <fnref n="2" />, Philippe Serp <fnref n="4" />, Katerina Soulantica <fnref n="3" /> and Spyridon Zafeiratos <fnref n="7" />,*

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Salusso, D.; Scarfiello, C.; Efimenko, A.; Pham Minh, D.; Serp, P.; Soulantica, K.; Zafeiratos, S. Direct Evidence of Dynamic Metal Support Interactions in Co/TiO₂ Catalysts by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. *Nanomaterials* **2023**, *13*, 2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192672

Academic Editor: Antonino Gulino

Received: 7 September 2023

Revised: 24 September 2023

Accepted: 25 September 2023

Published: 29 September 2023

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).

**Abstract:** The interaction between metal particles and the oxide support, the so-called metal-support interaction, plays a critical role in the performance of heterogenous catalysts. Probing the dynamic evolution of these interactions under reactive gas atmospheres is crucial to comprehending the structure-performance relationship and eventually designing new catalysts with enhanced properties. Cobalt supported on TiO₂ (Co/TiO₂) is an industrially relevant catalyst applied in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Although it is widely acknowledged that Co/TiO₂ is restructured during the reaction process, little is known about the impact of the specific gas phase environment at the material's surface. The combination of soft and hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopies are used to investigate in situ Co particles supported on pure and NaBH₄-modified TiO₂ under H₂, O₂, and CO₂:H₂ gas atmospheres. The combination of soft and hard X-ray photoemission methods, which allows for simultaneous probing of the chemical composition of surface and subsurface layers, is one of the study's unique features. It is shown that under H₂, cobalt particles are encapsulated below a stoichiometric TiO₂ layer. This arrangement is preserved under CO₂ hydrogenation conditions (i.e., CO₂:H₂), but changes rapidly upon exposure to O₂. The pretreatment of the TiO₂ support with NaBH₄ affects the surface mobility and prevents TiO₂ spillover onto Co particles.

**Keywords:** SMSI; dynamic surface phenomena; NAP-XPS; NAP-HAXPES; NEXAFS; cobalt nanoparticles; in situ and operando spectroscopy; CO₂ hydrogenation; tender X-rays

## 1. Introduction

Oxide-supported metal catalysts play a significant role in a wide range of industrial chemical processes, while they are crucial to the production of sustainable and clean energy from renewable resources [1,2]. The interaction between the metal and the support is critical for the catalytic performance since it controls important characteristics of the catalyst, such as the dispersion, electronic structure, and stability of the active phase [3]. Although the strength of the metal-support interaction is influenced by many different factors, reducible oxides are generally acknowledged to promote stronger interactions with the metal than the non-reducible ones [3–5].

<footnote n="1">¹ European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, CS 40220, CEDEX 9, 38043 Grenoble, France; davide.salusso@esrf.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Centre RAPSODEE UMR CNRS 5302, IMT Mines Albi, Université de Toulouse, Campus Jarlard, CEDEX 09, 81013 Albi, France; canio2sca@gmail.com (C.S.); doan.phamminh@mines-albi.fr (D.P.M.)</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie des Nano-Objets (LPCNO), Université de Toulouse, INSA, UPS, CNRS, LPCNO, 135 Avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France; ksoulant@insa-toulouse.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ LCC, CNRS-UPR 8241, ENSIACET, Université de Toulouse, 31030 Toulouse, France; philippe.serp@ensiacet.fr</footnote>

<footnote n="5">⁵ Interface Design, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB), Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany; anna.efimenko@helmholtz-berlin.de</footnote>

<footnote n="6">⁶ Energy Materials In-Situ Laboratory Berlin (EMIL), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB), Albert-Einstein-Str. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany</footnote>

<footnote n="7">⁷ Institut de Chimie et Procédés Pour l'Energie, l'Environnement et la Santé (ICPEES), ECPM, UMR 7515 CNRS—Université de Strasbourg, 25 Rue Becquerel, CEDEX 02, 67087 Strasbourg, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: spiros.zafeiratos@unistra.fr</footnote>
Pt supported on TiO₂ is the arch type of the so-called strong metal-support inter-
action (SMSI) systems, although other Pt-group metals on TiO₂ have also been widely
investigated [3–5]. It is now well established that metal-support interactions are dynamic
and their strength may significantly vary depending on the gas environment, ranging
from simple charge transfer to more extensive mass transport and surface restructuring [6].
Therefore, a fundamental understanding of SMSI phenomena is of paramount interest for
optimizing catalytic performance and designing innovative catalytic systems.

Although the SMSI effect was initially described almost 50 years ago [7], our under-
standing of it is far from comprehensive, and it remains one of the most researched areas
in heterogeneous catalysis [3–5,8]. The recent breakthrough developments of advanced
material characterization techniques, such as environmental high-resolution transmis-
sion electron microscopy (HRTEM), allowed us to visualize the dynamic interplay at the
metal–oxide interface during operation, which was not feasible in ex situ and postmortem
studies [9–11]. HRTEM studies can observe in real time the encapsulation of metal clusters
by a thin layer of reduced titanium oxide under reducing conditions, and the formation of
a thicker titania overlayer upon subsequent oxidative treatment [9–11].

Although less studied than Pt-group metals, transition metals, such as Ni and Co
supported on TiO2, are known to undergo restructuring processes under reaction condi-
tions [10]. In particular, encapsulation of Co nanoparticles under a thin reduced titania layer
has been observed after H2 treatment of Co/TiO2 catalysts [12–14]. Deeper understanding
of these interactions is essential in order to improve the performance of such catalysts
in industrial applications. For example, Co/TiO2 is one of the most industrially applied
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) catalysts [2,15]. FTS is used to synthesize diesel from
biomass feedstocks, among other products. As for Pt/TiO2 catalysts, microscopy techniques
are primarily used in order to visualize changes in the Co-TiO2 interface in response to
the gas phase environment [12,13,16]. However, SMSI phenomena over Co/TiO2 catalysts
have been mostly noticed by ex situ experiments in which the sample was transferred to the
microscope after reduction/oxidation gas treatments. In addition, due to the low contrast
difference between Ti and Co atoms, in situ HRTEM studies are more challenging than
those over Pt/TiO2.

Instead, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), due to its chemical specificity and sur-
face sensitivity, is a powerful tool to study chemical and structural transitions of Co/TiO2
upon interaction with gas atmospheres. In addition, photoemission experiments are quan-
titative and give an average information over the entire sampling geometric area (around
100 µm [17]), providing a quite representative image of the overall sample structure. The
recent development of XPS spectrometers capable of operating at pressures of a few tens of
millibars [18–20], referred to as near-ambient pressure XPS (NAP-XPS), provides new op-
portunities to study SMSI process in reaction environments. However, only a few NAP-XPS
studies exist on SMSI effects in TiO2-supported catalysts [21–23] and to the best of our
knowledge, none concerning the Co/TiO2 system.

Herein, we present a synchrotron-based near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron
and absorption study of cobalt catalysts supported on pure and NaBH₄-modified TiO₂ [24],
in H₂, CO₂:H₂, and O₂ gas atmospheres. This work is unique in the field of SMSI in-
vestigations in that soft and hard X-rays are coupled to extend the analysis depth of the
photoemission process by an order of magnitude (from about 2.5 to 25 nm). The results
show a dynamic response of the catalysts to the gas phase environment and reveal critical
differences between pure and NaBH₄-modified Co/TiO₂ catalysts.

**2. Materials and Methods**

2.1. *Catalysts Preparation*

Initially, commercial TiO₂-P25 (Evonik) was partially reduced using NaBH₄ as the
reducing agent, leading to the incorporation of Na and B promoters. More specifically,
known amounts of NaBH₄ were dissolved in ethanol in a rotavapor flask and then TiO₂-
P25 powder was added to the solution. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h (25 °C,
500 mbar) and subsequently, the ethanol was removed using a rotavapor (80 °C, 150 mbar for 30 min and then 75 mbar for 30 min). Next, the sample was dried overnight at 120 °C in a static oven and then treated in a tubular oven under argon at 320–370 °C for 15 min. Afterwards, the resulting blue product was recovered under Ar and then washed three times with distilled water, followed by washing with absolute ethanol. Finally, the product was dried for 15 h at 150 °C under argon. Textural, chemical, and crystallite properties of the TiO₂ and m-TiO₂ supports are given in Table S1.

Subsequently, modified and unmodified TiO₂ were used to prepare 10 wt% Co-based catalysts by conventional incipient wetness impregnation. To do so, the TiO₂ supports were placed in a Schlenk flask and degassed for 2 h under vacuum at 150 °C (oil bath temperature). After cooling down at room temperature, an aqueous metal precursor solution (Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O) was added under vacuum and continuous stirring. The resulting mixture was sonicated for 30 min, followed by 30 min of stirring. The sonication/stirring sequence was repeated 4 times. The mixture was dried for 24 h at 80 °C followed by 12 h at 120 °C in a static furnace. Finally, the powder was calcined for 4 h at 460 °C under Ar. Hereafter, the unmodified and modified catalysts will be referred to as Co/TiO₂ and Co/m-TiO₂, respectively. The bulk atomic concentration (at%) of the various catalysts' components, as calculated by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) measurements, was 9.6 at% Co for Co/TiO₂ and 8.0 at% Co, 1.4 at% Na, and 0.2 at% B for Co/m-TiO₂. Because of the low contrast difference between Ti and Co, electron microscopy could not be used to assess the size and distribution of Co particles. Instead, the cobalt crystallite size was determined from XRD measurements using the Scherrer equation. The quantification of the metallic Co crystallite size of the reduced catalysts was not possible due to the overlap of various crystallographic phases. In the case of calcined catalysts, the crystallite size of Co₃O₄ was determined to be around 37 nm and 44 nm for Co/TiO₂ and Co/m-TiO₂, respectively.

## 2.2. Spectroscopic Measurements

Near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-XPS) and near-ambient pressure hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-HAXPES) combined with near edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (NEXAFS), were applied to probe the surface state of the pre-reduced Co/TiO₂ and Co/m-TiO₂ catalysts. Experiments were performed at the new CAT branch of the dual-colour Energy Materials In-Situ Laboratory (EMIL) beamline (CAT@EMIL) at the synchrotron radiation facility BESSY II of the Helmholtz Zentrum, Berlin [17,25]. A specificity of the CAT@EMIL beamline is the possibility to use soft and hard X-ray radiation (in our case, 4.9 keV, thus in the energy border between tender and hard X-rays) provided by two undulators, UE48 and CPMU17, monochromatized by plane-grating monochromator (PGM) and a double crystal monochromator (DCM), respectively, and focused to the sample position by means of a set of optical mirrors in a single experiment. The variability of the incident photon energy permits non-destructive depth profiling from the extreme surface to the subsurface. The experimental station hosts SPECS PHOIBUS 150 NAP analyzer with a 2D-CMOS detector.

The two catalysts were initially reduced ex situ at 350 °C in 1 bar 40% H₂/Ar flow for 4 h. The reduced powder was pressed into pellets and mounted on a sapphire sample holder between a stainless-steel back-plate and a lid with 5 mm hole. To guarantee the repeatability of the treatment conditions, the two catalysts were put together, in close proximity, on the sample holder (Figure S1). The sample stage was heated from the rear by an IR laser. Gases were introduced into the analysis chamber via calibrated mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst). The gas phase composition was monitored by a differentially pumped quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS, Pfeiffer PrismaPro) connected to the sample chamber through a leak valve. The NAP-XPS spectra were measured with a PGM (Bestec GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and a 60 µm exit slit. The NAP-HAXPES was measured with a DCM (Bestec GmbH, Berlin, Germany) using Si (111) crystal pair.
The two catalysts were first annealed in front of the spectrometer nozzle for 30 min at 350 °C under 5 mbar H₂ before being cooled to 200 °C to record the spectra in H₂. Then, the gas atmosphere was changed to a CO₂:H₂ (1:2) mixture with an overall pressure of 2.5 mbar and the temperature was raised to 250 °C where a new set of spectroscopic measurements was recorded. Finally, the CO₂:H₂ mixture was replaced by 1 mbar O₂ and the temperature further rose to 350 °C in order to obtain the characteristic spectra of the oxidized catalysts. The NAP-XPS, NAP-HAXPES, and NEXAFS spectroscopic measurements were carried out consecutively on each sample while maintaining stable gas and temperature conditions.

Quantification of the elements was performed after normalization of the XPS spectra intensities by considering the photon flux and the atomic subshell photoionization cross sections. The photoionization cross sections and the inelastic mean free paths (IMFPs) of photoelectrons were obtained by the SESSA (Simulation of Electron Spectra for Surface Analysis) software (version 2.2) [26]. The incident photon flux was measured based on the sample drain current of a cleaned Au foil. The binding energies (BE) of the photoemission peaks presented here are referred to the Fermi edge cut-off position, measured using the same photon energy with the core-level spectrum measured just before. Unless otherwise stated, the accuracy of BE calibration was estimated to be ±0.1 eV. The XPS spectra were analyzed using CasaXPS software (Casa Software Ltd., version 2.3.25). After linear or Shirley background subtraction, the B 1s, Na 1s, and O 1s spectra were fitted by symmetric Gaussian-Lorentzian line shapes, while constrains on the width and the relative BE position of the fitting components were applied.

The excitation photon energy of the NAP-XPS core-level spectra was selected in such a way that the emitted photoelectrons have comparable kinetic energies (KE). Two sets of NAP-XPS spectra with two different KE (about 180 and 450 eV) were measured, corresponding to two analysis depths (a.d.) of about 2.5 and 5 nm, respectively (the information depth is considered to be 3 times the IMFP) [27]. For all NAP-HAXPES experiments discussed in this work, the photon energy was fixed to 4900 eV (information depth about 25 nm).

The Co L$_{3,2}$- and Ti L$_{3,2}$-edge NEXAFS spectra were measured in the total electron yield (TEY) mode, using a Faraday cup installed in the first aperture of the analyzer electrostatic lenses. In general, the analysis depth of NEXAFS measurements in the TEY mode ranged between 5 and 10 nm [28].

**3. Results and Discussion**

**3.1. *Chemical State Measured in H₂ and CO₂:H₂ Gas Atmospheres***

Figure 1 shows the Co and Ti 2p core level and valence band spectra of the two catalysts measured at 200 °C in 5 mbar H₂ and at 250 °C in a 2.5 mbar CO₂:H₂ mixture. The peak shape and the binding energy of the Co 2p₃/₂ peak at 778 ± 0.1 eV (Figure 1a) is characteristic of metallic Co [29,30]. The two catalysts have almost identical Co 2p₃/₂ spectra, suggesting that the modification of TiO₂ support by NaBH₄ does not notably affect the cobalt chemical state. In addition, Co 2p₃/₂ seems unaffected after switching the gas atmosphere to the CO₂:H₂ mixture, as validated by the NEXAFS data (vide infra). The Ti 2p spectra (Figure 1b) are composed of two peaks at 459.1 eV and 464.8 eV, which are ascribed to Ti 2p₃/₂ and Ti 2p₁/₂ in TiO₂, respectively. The Ti 2p peaks of both samples are identical in H₂ and CO₂:H₂ atmospheres and correspond to the Ti⁴⁺ ions of stoichiometric TiO₂ [22]. It is interesting that there are no evident peak features at the low BE side of the Ti 2p that could be ascribed to Ti³⁺ formation [22]. This shows that TiO₂ is not reduced under the present hydrogen treatment, a result which is consistent with our NEXAFS Ti L-edge spectra (vide infra).
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** (a) Co 2p<sub>3/2</sub>, (b) Ti 2p, and (c) valence band (VB) NAP-XPS spectra of Co/m-TiO<sub>2</sub> (black lines) and Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> (red lines) catalysts measured under 5 mbar H<sub>2</sub> at 200 °C (dark-colored lines) and 2.5 mbar CO<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub> at 350 °C (light-colored lines). Spectra are normalized to the same height to facilitate peak shape comparison. The excitation photon energies for each spectrum (in blue) are selected so as to give photoelectrons with kinetic energies around 180 eV. The estimated analysis depth of the presented spectra is about 2.5 nm (calculated as 3 times the inelastic mean free path of the photoelectrons).</figcaption></figure>

The valence band (VB) is dominated by the Ti 3d and O 2p states between 10 eV and 3 eV [31] and the characteristic Co 3d sharp cut-off at the Fermi level [32]. The relative height of the two distinct features at 5.2 and 7.2 eV is sensitive to the type of TiO<sub>2</sub> polymorph (a-TiO<sub>2</sub> (anatase) or r-TiO<sub>2</sub> (rutile)) [31]. The VB spectra of the Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> and Co/m-TiO<sub>2</sub> catalysts look alike, confirming the core-level spectra, which indicated that the two catalysts have identical Co and Ti oxidation states. In addition to that, the stability of the two features corresponding to Ti 3d and O 2p states indicates that there is no phase transition of TiO<sub>2</sub> under the reaction conditions employed.

The presence of B 1s and Na 1s photoemission peaks (Figure 2) indicates that Na and B remain on Co/m-TiO₂ sample surface after the NaBH₄ treatment. Previous reports have shown that the BE of the B 1s is sensitive to the boron local chemical environment [33–36]. In particular, the B 1s peak of anionic B²⁻ (i.e., TiB₂ or CoB) and cationic B³⁺ (i.e., B₂O₃) appears around 187.5 eV and 193 eV, respectively, while B occupying substitutional or interstitial TiO₂ sites is found between 190 and 192 eV [33–36]. Under H₂, the BE of B 1s peak was measured at 192.3 ± 0.1 eV (Figure 2a), which suggests that B most probably forms an oxide, rather than being integrated in the TiO₂ structure by substitution of TiO₂ sites. Moreover, the BE at 192.3 eV is significantly lower than that reported for the common B₂O₃ oxide, indicating that boron is partially reduced forming a substoichiometric oxide (e.g., boron suboxide, B₆O). The low width (1.35 eV) and the symmetry of the peak shape under H₂ is a sign that this is the unique boron oxidation state. Under CO₂:H₂, the B 1s peak becomes broader and shows an asymmetry at the high BE side (Figure 2b). Curve fitting of the B 1s suggests the presence of an additional B 1s peak at 193.3 eV, which is compatible with oxidation of B-suboxide to B₂O₃. This indicates the affinity of B towards the CO₂ present in the reaction mixture, which is considered a mild oxidant. One should note here that the QMS results showed negligible H₂O production under the low-pressure conditions employed suggesting that CO₂ is the only oxidant present in the gas phase.
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** B 1s core level spectra of Co/m-TiO₂ catalyst measured under (a) 5 mbar H₂ at 200 °C and (b) 2.5 mbar CO₂:H₂ at 350 °C. Na 1s spectra of Co/m-TiO₂ catalyst under (c) 5 mbar H₂ at 200 °C and (d) 2.5 mbar CO₂:H₂ at 350 °C. Spectra are normalized to the same height to facilitate peak shape comparison. The Na 1s spectra were recorded at 3 different excitation photon energies corresponding to 3 different analysis depths (a.d.) (indicated in blue).</figcaption></figure>

The Na 1s spectra in H₂ (Figure 2c) show a single symmetric peak at 1072.5 eV, which is characteristic of Na₂O and/or ionic Na species bound to the surrounding support through –O–Na linkages [37,38]. For the sake of convenience, the two species mentioned above are abbreviated as NaOₓ. The formation of sodium carbonate or hydroxide species is unlikely, since in that case, the Na 1s would appear at a considerably lower BE [39]. When the catalyst is exposed to CO₂:H₂ (Figure 2d), an evident shoulder appears at the low BE side of the Na 1s peak. The Na 1s curve fitting shows the presence of an additional Na 1s component shifted by 1 eV towards a lower BE (1071.5 eV). This peak has been previously assigned to sodium titanate species [40,41]. The depth-dependent Na 1s spectra included in Figure 2d clearly show surface enrichment of the 1071.5 eV peak as compared to the one at 1072.5 eV. This signifies that sodium titanates are formed on top of NaOₓ species.

The O 1s and C 1s spectra are presented in Figure 3. The peak at 530.3 ± 0.1 eV, due to lattice TiO₂ species [42], dominates the O 1s spectra of the two catalysts (Figure 3a). No discernible differences can be observed in the O 1s peaks of the two catalysts, thereby hindering the ability to differentiate between the contributions of B and Na oxides in the overall peak. Nevertheless, curve fitting of the O 1s peak allows us to distinguish a small O 1s component at 531.6 ± 0.2 eV, typically connected to surface C=O and/or surface adsorbed –OH groups [42]. Since the contribution of C=O is minor in the C 1s peak (vide infra), the component at 531.6 eV should be mainly attributed to –OH species. This is confirmed by depth-dependent O 1s data (Figure S2), which demonstrate a decrease in the 531.6 eV component at deeper analysis depths. In the case of the Co/TiO₂ sample, the fraction of the OH-peak increases and shifts to higher BEs in CO₂:H₂ suggesting a higher abundance of oxygenated species in this case.
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** (a) O 1s and (b) C 1s spectra of Co/TiO₂ and Co/m-TiO₂ catalyst measured under 5 mbar H₂ at 200 °C and 2.5 mbar CO₂:H₂ at 350 °C. The O 1s spectra are normalized to the same height while those of C 1s are not.</figcaption></figure>

The C 1s peak at 284.6 ± 0.1 eV (Figure 3b) is due to C-C and C-H carbon bonds of adventitious hydrocarbons, as could be anticipated for samples that have previously been exposed to air. Notably, the amount of carbon species is more important for Co/TiO₂ than Co/m-TiO₂ suggesting that the NaBH₄ treatment influences the reactivity of TiO₂ towards carbon. The C 1s spectra in H₂ and the CO₂:H₂ mixture appear very similar, apart from a decrease in the peak intensity under reaction conditions, which is translated to less adsorbed carbon. A small feature at the high-BE side of the C 1s peak in CO₂:H₂ can be attributed to the formation of C-O and/or hydroxy species. However, the absence of a peak at around 290 eV can safely exclude the formation of carbonates [43].

The Co and Ti L-edge X-ray absorption spectra (Figure 4) provide fine details about the electronic and geometric structure of Co and Ti. The Co L-edge (Figure 4a) is composed of two peaks (i.e., Co L₃- and L₂-edges) due to the spin-orbit coupling of the Co 2p states. The sharp rising edge of Co L₃ with the intense maxima at 778.7 eV, as well as the absence of fine structure features at the high photon energy side of the peak, are typical characteristics of metallic Co states [22,30]. Notably, the Co L-edge of the two catalysts is similar and appears to be unaffected by the gas phase conditions, confirming the NAP-XPS results.

The Ti L-edge spectra are included in Figure 4b. The edge splits into two peaks due to the spin-orbit coupling of the Ti 2p states, similar to the Co L-edge. Note that the peak intensity ratio between the two peaks around 460 eV (indicated by the arrows in the figure) is sensitive to the TiO₂ crystal symmetry. In particular, the lower photon energy spectral feature is considerably greater in height for a-TiO₂ compared to r-TiO₂ [22,44]. The Ti L-edge absorption profiles in Figure 4b, including the peak features around 460 eV, correspond to previously reported spectra of a-TiO₂ [22,44]. Notably, all the Ti L-edges are comparable in terms of spectral line shape and peak excitation energies, suggesting that the valence state and phase of Ti are not affected by the gas atmosphere, which is consistent with the NAP-XPS results (Figure 1). Please note that, while a-TiO₂ is obviously the dominant surface state based on VB photoemission and Ti L-edge absorption spectra, the existence of minor quantities of r-TiO₂ cannot be ruled out since their spectroscopic features are obscured by the strong signal of the dominant a-TiO₂ phase.
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Normalized (a) Co L<sub>3,2</sub>-edge and (b) Ti L<sub>3,2</sub>-edge NEXAFS spectra of Co/m-TiO<sub>2</sub> (black lines) and Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> (red lines) catalysts measured under 5 mbar H<sub>2</sub> at 200 °C (dark-colored lines) and 2.5 mbar CO<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub> at 350 °C (light-colored lines).</figcaption></figure>

In summary, the analysis of the spectroscopic results reveals that Co stays metallic and TiO<sub>2</sub> is completely oxidized under the employed H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub> conditions. The comparability of spectroscopic data from Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> and Co/m-TiO<sub>2</sub> samples indicates that modification of TiO<sub>2</sub> by Na and B does not influence the surface chemical state or the electronic structure of Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> catalyst. Although the CO<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub> mixture induces further boron oxidization and promotes sodium titanate formation compared to their state in H<sub>2</sub>, it has no effect on Co or TiO<sub>2</sub>. These findings are more consistent with a static surface configuration than the well-documented dynamic evolution of SMSI systems. This can be justified by the chemical potential of the gas phase, which is highly reducing in both H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>:H<sub>2</sub> atmospheres. Therefore, below, we investigate the surface dynamics under oxidative conditions by changing the gas environment to O<sub>2</sub>.

## 3.2. *Surface Transformation upon Exposure to O₂*

The surface transformation of the reduced samples in an O₂ atmosphere is examined next. Figure 5 shows the NAP-XPS and NEXAFS spectra of Co/m-TiO₂ and Co/TiO₂ recorded in 1 mbar O₂ at 350 °C. The Co 2p photoemission peaks (Figure 5) become broader and shift to higher BEs in O₂ compared to the previously recorded spectra in CO₂:H₂. This, together with the presence of the low intensity satellite feature around 790 eV, suggests complete oxidation to Co₃O₄ [22,29,30]. This is supported by the NEXAFS Co L-edge in Figure 5 (top, right), which is typical of a bulk Co₃O₄ spinel structure [22,29,30]. The Ti 2p and Ti L-edge spectra look identical to those recorded in CO₂:H₂, which indicates that the a-TiO₂ phase is preserved in O₂. The analysis of the B 1s and Na 1s peaks reveals that the
proportion of the components at 193.3 eV and 1071.5 eV is enhanced in O₂ compared to CO₂:H₂. (see Figure 2). This supports the hypothesis that the presence of oxidants in the gas environment, including mild oxidants like CO₂ (Figure 2), promotes the synthesis of Na-titanate and B₂O₃.

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Co 2p<sub>3/2</sub>, Ti 2p, B 1s, Na 1s, valence band (VB) NAP-XPS, and Co and Ti L<sub>3,2</sub>-edge spectra of Co/m-TiO<sub>2</sub> (blue lines) and Co/TiO<sub>2</sub> (magenta lines) catalysts measured in 1 mbar O<sub>2</sub> at 350 °C. The excitation photon energies for each NAP-XPS spectrum (shown in blue) are selected so as to produce photoelectrons with kinetic energies around 180 eV. The estimated information depth is about 2.5 nm (calculated as 3 times the inelastic mean free path of the photoelectrons). The presented spectra are normalized to the same height.</figcaption></figure>

The spectra of the valence band region confirm the interpretation of the core level peaks. More specifically, the distinct feature appearing at around 2 eV is due to Co 3d states [45], which upon cobalt oxidation are shifted 2 eV below the Fermi edge. On the contrary the features at 10 eV–3 eV region, corresponding primarily to Ti 3d-O 2p states, are identical to those found in H<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>:CO<sub>2</sub> (Figure 1) confirming the NEXAFS findings. The O 1s spectra of the two samples become significantly broader in O<sub>2</sub> compared to the previous reduced state (the FWHM of the O 1s peak increases from around 1.3 to 1.8 eV) and shifts by about 0.2 eV to lower BEs. These changes can be understood by the appearance of a new O 1s component due to Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>; however, the absence of clear spectral features in the O 1s peak makes O 1s curve fitting ambiguous, and therefore will not be attempted in this case.
### 3.3. *Effect of the Gas Atmosphere on the Surface Composition*

Due to its high surface sensitivity, photoemission spectroscopy is a powerful tool to quantify the atomic concentration at the very surface. Figure 6 compares the surface atomic composition of the Co/m-TiO₂ and Co/TiO₂ catalysts in reducing, reaction, and oxidizing gas environments calculated from the NAP-XPS data. The bulk concentration based on the ICP-OES analysis is included for comparison. In the NAP-XPS calculations, it is assumed that the sample is homogeneous over the analyzed depth. Noteworthy, for layered samples (as will be discussed later) this approximation overestimates the concentration from the top layer relative to that of the layers below. Therefore, one should be cautious when comparing the absolute values of the NAP-XPS and ICP-OES results. Nevertheless, the quantitative NAP-XPS analysis can be used for comparisons to reveal modifications of the surface composition as a function of the gas environment.

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 6.** Comparison of atomic concentrations determined from NAP-XPS spectra (analysis depth 2.5 nm) acquired in H₂, CO₂:H₂, and O₂ atmospheres at the temperatures indicated at the bottom of the graph for (a) Co/TiO₂ and (b) Co/TiO₂ catalysts. For comparison, the bulk atomic concentrations from ICP-OES measurements are presented. Above the black bars, the atomic concentration of cobalt is indicated.</figcaption></figure>

In H₂ and CO₂:H₂ atmospheres, the Co surface concentration of Co/TiO₂ (Figure 6a) is about half of that found by ICP-OES, indicating that the surface is enriched with TiO₂. However, when the gas environment is changed to O₂, the Co concentration increases significantly, greatly beyond that of ICP-OES. This reflects a dynamic response of the surface composition to the gas atmosphere, with TiO₂ segregating over Co in reducing conditions, and Co re-emerging back on the surface in an oxidizing atmosphere.

Significant differences between bulk and surface compositions were also found for Co/m-TiO₂ (Figure 6b). In particular, in H₂ and CO₂:H₂, the surface contains about 3 times less Co and almost 25 times more Na and B compared to the bulk concentration of these elements. This is a sound evidence that Na and B are the dominant elements on the sample surface. The surface concentration of Co, Ti, and B increase in O₂ compared to the previous state in CO₂:H₂, at the expense of Na. As shown in Figure 5, this is accompanied by enhancement of the component related to Na-titanate species. Thus, when exposed to oxidizing conditions, a portion of the TiO₂ support interacts with NaOₓ at the surface to create Na-titanates. This is not necessarily a solid-state reaction, but might simply be due to sodium migration within the TiO₂ lattice. As was showed earlier, Na⁺ ions may be
introduced into the TiO₂ host without damaging the anatase structure or altering the TiO₂
oxidation state [46].

3.4. *Depth Distribution of the Catalyst Components*

By taking advantage of the tunability of synchrotron radiation, one can vary the
kinetic energy of photoelectrons and in turn the information depth of the measurements.
This approach, usually referred to as depth-profiling, allows the quantification of the
composition at various depths, which is particularly useful in cases of layered surface
morphologies as is obviously the case here. The combination of NAP-XPS and NAP-
HAXPES enables the excitation photon energy to be varied between 370 and 4900 eV,
thereby extending the sample depth from 2.5 to 25 nm. More details about the relationship
between photon energy and analysis depth can be found in the Supplementary Material.

Figure 7a shows the evolution of Co and Ti %at for Co/TiO₂, as a function of the analysis depth measured at 200 °C in 5 mbar H₂. The Ti atomic fraction is clearly enhanced at the surface (up to 5 nm) compared to the subsurface measurement (25 nm), which can be associated with the encapsulation of Co under a thin TiO₂ overlayer (shown in the graphical illustration in Figure 8). This finding is consistent with the low surface fraction of Co compared to the bulk concentration shown in Figure 6a. This is a classical manifestation of SMSIs between Co and TiO₂, where the support, in a partially reduced state, migrates onto Co particles during the reduction process [12]. Despite the fact that the SMSIs are frequently accompanied by partially reduced TiO₂ species (e.g., Ti³⁺) [12,22], in our case, the Ti 2p and Ti L-edge spectra did not show any evidence of reduced TiO₂ for all analysis depths. This implies that this configuration existed prior to the NAP-XPS studies, most likely happening during the ex situ reduction pretreatment at 1 bar (see Section 2.1), which is much more aggressive than the reducing conditions in the NAP-XPS chamber. Under the CO₂:H₂ reaction conditions, the depth profile measurements are qualitatively similar to those presented above under H₂, suggesting no significant surface reconstruction during reaction, in agreement with the findings of Figure 6a.

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 7.** The atomic concentration calculated based on NAP-XPS and NAP-HAXPES spectra as a function of the analysis depth (defined as 3 times the IMFP) measured at 200 °C in 5 mbar H₂ (*a*,*c*) and (*b*,*d*) at 350 °C in 1 mbar O₂ for Co/TiO₂ (*a*,*b*) and (*c*,*d*) Co/m-TiO₂ catalysts.</figcaption></figure>
<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 8.** Illustration of the proposed surface arrangement of Co/TiO₂ and Co/m-TiO₂ catalysts in H₂ and CO₂:H₂ atmospheres as well as in subsequent exposure to O₂.</figcaption></figure>

In the O₂ atmosphere (Figure 7b), the trend between the two elements is reversed compared to H₂, with the Co fraction strongly increased near the surface (2.5 nm) but stabilized when deeper layers are probed. This is a clear indication that the thin TiO₂ overlayer on Co, which manifested in H₂ and CO₂:H₂ atmospheres, retreats under oxidative conditions and cobalt is exposed on the surface (Figure 8). The reversibility of the TiO₂ spillover effect, where Co is oxidized and segregates above TiO₂, has been suggested in early SMSI literature [9]. However, to our knowledge this is one of the rare cases where the reversibility of the SMSI effect is evidenced in situ with a method other than microscopy.

Figure 7c shows the depth distribution of Co, Ti, Na, and B for the Co/m-TiO₂ sample under H₂. The enhanced concentration of Na and B at the more surface-sensitive measurements (i.e., 2.5 and 5 nm) implies that these elements are not equally distributed within the catalyst volume, but preferentially situated on its surface, above Ti and Co (Figure 8). This interpretation agrees with the high surface concentration found for Na and B as compared to the bulk concentration, as shown in Figure 6b.

When the Co/m-TiO₂ sample is annealed in O₂ (Figure 7d), the Co and Ti evolution with analysis depth remains qualitatively similar to that observed in H₂, meaning that B and Na are still dominating the extreme surface. However, a comparison of the Co %at between H₂ and O₂ atmospheres reveals that there is more Co under O₂ for all analysis depths, comparable to the finding for Co/TiO₂. The rise in Co percentage under O₂ should be linked to the decrease in Na %at. This may be caused by either a drop in the thickness of the Na layer over the Co₃O₄ particles or its full disappearance. The latter scenario is rather improbable due to the fact that depth profiling measurements (Figure 7d) clearly show that it is Na %at which is enhanced at the outer surface compared to the subsurface, and not Co. One can assume that boron oxides are also preferentially located at the extreme surface, since B %at has a similar evolution with Na as a function of the analysis depth (Figure 7d). Therefore, as shown in Figure 8, we propose that the Na and B surface overlayer formed under reducing conditions is maintained under O₂ but decreases in thickness. One should mention here that depth profile measurements cannot distinguish if the overlayer above cobalt is dense or has a certain porosity that would allow access to gases during reaction. The two morphologies (i.e., porous or dense Na and B surface overlayer) are expected to lead to radical differences in the catalytic performance. In particular, a dense surface layer will block the access of the reactants to cobalt, thus decrease the number of active sites and consequently the catalytic activity. On the contrary, in case of a porous overlayer, not only cobalt sites remain accessible to the reactants, but the additives can also act as promoters, enhancing the catalytic turnover.

The aforementioned analysis suggests that the modification of the TiO₂ support by Na and B does not affect the chemical state of the cobalt catalyst, but plays a significant role in the arrangement between Co and TiO₂ by preventing TiO₂ migration over cobalt. At this stage, it is not clear if the lower surface mobility on m-TiO₂ is due to the lower reducibility of this support. Under the reduction conditions employed in the NAP-XPS experiment, TiO₂ was quite stable for both samples. In addition, H₂-TPR measurements
were not conclusive about the effect of Na and B in the reducibility of the TiO₂. In any case, XPS is the method of choice here since H₂-TPR lacks the sensitivity to detect surface reduction of TiO₂, which is critical to identifying SMSIs.

Overall, the goal of this study was to examine the evolution of Co/TiO₂ catalysts in reactive gas atmospheres while also contributing to our understanding of metal-support interaction mechanisms. The observed surface restructuring accompanied by changes in cobalt phase, seen while switching between reducing and oxidative gas atmospheres, are likely to alter the catalyst's reactivity. According to our findings, a thin TiO₂ layer is anticipated to develop on top of the cobalt during H₂ activation of calcined catalysts. This layer will affect the cobalt particle growth and the accessibility of the reactants over cobalt sites. However, whether the geometric and electronic structure of pre-reduced Co/TiO₂ catalysts is maintained throughout reaction conditions, or the catalyst undergoes additional alterations, remains open. The measurements in the CO₂-FTS-relevant conditions (i.e., CO₂:H₂ mixture at 250 °C) presented in this paper, suggest that the cobalt chemical state and atomic concentration remain rather stable. In contrast, we found a noticeable change in the chemical state of B and Na in CO₂-FTS conditions for Co supported on NaBH₄-modified TiO₂. In particular, the presence of CO₂ in the gas phase oxidizes boron and triggers an interaction at the Na-TiO₂ interface. This trend implies that under realistic high-pressure FTS reaction conditions, B₂O₃ and Na-titanates may be the dominating surface species over the Co/m-TiO₂ catalyst. Furthermore, our findings imply that when cobalt is oxidized, for example by H₂O production under FTS conditions, unmodified catalysts experience considerable surface restructuring, which is not the case with Co/m-TiO₂. Although these findings provide important insights into dynamic surface modifications, it is impossible to predict how the catalytic performance will be modified based solely on these data. Before attempting to connect surface states with catalytic performance, further information about the active phase features, such as nanoparticle size, shape, and exposed facets, is necessary.

## 4. Conclusions

In summary, in this work, we combined NAP-XPS, NAP-HAXPES, and NEXAFS spectroscopies to explore the in situ interaction of two Co/TiO₂ catalysts with H₂, CO₂:H₂, and O₂ atmospheres. We found that cobalt is reduced to the metallic state under the employed H₂ and CO₂:H₂ conditions, while it is readily transformed to spinel Co₃O₄ upon switching to O₂. On the contrary, the titania chemical state and structure are not affected by the gas treatment with the a-TiO₂ phase dominating the surface. The treatment of TiO₂ with NaBH₄ left significant amounts of Na and B residuals on the surface even after Co deposition in the aqueous metal precursor solution. The restructuring of the Co-TiO₂ interface under operating conditions was directly observed by quantitative analysis of photoemission results combined with depth-profiling measurements. It was shown that, under reduction conditions, cobalt particles are encapsulated below a stoichiometric TiO₂ layer. This arrangement seems to be preserved under the employed CO₂ hydrogenation conditions, but rapidly changes upon exposure to O₂. The pretreatment of the TiO₂ support with NaBH₄ affects the surface mobility of TiO₂ and, to a large extent, prevents spillover onto cobalt. However, in this case, cobalt is covered under a Na and B layer, probably formed upon reduction. To a large extent, this layer is preserved upon O₂ exposure, despite a notable decrease in its thickness. Our findings highlight the dynamic behavior of the Co-TiO₂ interface in reducing and oxidizing gas atmospheres, which is of particular interest to understand the performance of these materials in catalytic applications.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13192672/s1, Table S1: Textural, chemical, and crystallite properties of TiO₂ supports; Figure S1: Photograph of the sample holder and details about the relationship between photon energy and analysis depth. Figure S2: The O 1s spectra of Co/TiO₂ catalysts measured in 2.5 mbar CO₂:H₂ at 350 °C with 3 different excitation photon energies corresponding to 3 different analysis depths (a.d) (indicated in blue). Spectra are normalized to the same height to facilitate peak shape comparison. Refs. [47,48] are cited in Supplementary Materials.
**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, S.Z., D.P.M., P.S. and K.S.; validation, S.Z. and C.S.; formal analysis, S.Z. and D.S.; investigation, S.Z. and A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z. and D.S.; writing—review and editing, S.Z. and D.S.; supervision, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** The research leading to these results has been supported by the project CALIPSOplus under the Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Part of this work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (project ANR-19-CE07-0030), which is gratefully acknowledged.

**Data Availability Statement:** Data are available on request.

**Acknowledgments:** We want to acknowledge HZB for the allocation of synchrotron radiation beam-time (proposal no 222-11356-ST) and BESSY II Synchrotron staff for the collaboration during the experiments. We would like to thank M. Hävecker for his valuable support and M. Barreau for his help during the synchrotron measurements.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## References

1. Lee, D.W.; Yoo, B.R. Advanced Metal Oxide (Supported) Catalysts: Synthesis and Applications. *J. Ind. Eng. Chem.* **2014**, *20*, 3947–3959. [CrossRef]

2. Scarfiello, C.; Pham Minh, D.; Soulantica, K.; Serp, P. Oxide Supported Cobalt Catalysts for CO₂ Hydrogenation to Hydrocarbons: Recent Progress. *Adv. Mater. Interfaces* **2023**, *10*, 2202516. [CrossRef]

3. Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.; Dai, S. Nonclassical Strong Metal-Support Interactions for Enhanced Catalysis. *J. Phys. Chem. Lett.* **2023**, *14*, 2364–2377. [CrossRef]

4. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, D.; Bai, F.; Han, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J. Metal-Support Interactions for Heterogeneous Catalysis: Mechanisms, Characterization Techniques and Applications. *J. Mater. Chem. A Mater.* **2023**, *11*, 8540–8572. [CrossRef]

5. Lou, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, C.; Dong, Y.; Zhu, Y. Metal-Support Interaction for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Nanoparticles to Single Atoms. *Mater. Today Nano* **2020**, *12*, 100093. [CrossRef]

6. Mitchell, S.; Qin, R.; Zheng, N.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Nanoscale Engineering of Catalytic Materials for Sustainable Technologies. *Nat. Nanotechnol.* **2021**, *16*, 129–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7. Tauster, S.J.; Fung, S.C.; Garten, R.L. Strong Metal-Support Interactions. Group 8 Noble Metals Supported on TiO₂. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **1978**, *100*, 170–175. [CrossRef]

8. Xie, Y.; Wen, J.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ning, P.; Hao, J. Double-Edged Sword Effect of Classical Strong Metal-Support Interaction in Catalysts for CO₂ Hydrogenation to CO, Methane, and Methanol. *ACS Mater. Lett.* **2023**, *5*, 2629–2647. [CrossRef]

9. Frey, H.; Beck, A.; Huang, X.; van Bokhoven, J.A.; Willinger, M.G. Dynamic Interplay between Metal Nanoparticles and Oxide Support under Redox Conditions. *Science* **2022**, *376*, 982–987. [CrossRef]

10. Monai, M.; Jenkinson, K.; Melcherts, A.E.M.; Louwen, J.N.; Irmak, E.A.; Van Aert, S.; Altantzis, T.; Vogt, C.; van der Stam, W.; Duchoň, T.; et al. Restructuring of Titanium Oxide Overlayers over Nickel Nanoparticles during Catalysis. *Science* **2023**, *380*, 644–651. [CrossRef]

11. Beck, A.; Huang, X.; Artiglia, L.; Zabilskiy, M.; Wang, X.; Rzepka, P.; Palagin, D.; Willinger, M.G.; van Bokhoven, J.A. The Dynamics of Overlayer Formation on Catalyst Nanoparticles and Strong Metal-Support Interaction. *Nat. Commun.* **2020**, *11*, 3220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. De La Peña O'Shea, V.A.; Consuelo Álvarez Galván, M.; Platero Prats, A.E.; Campos-Martin, J.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Direct Evidence of the SMSI Decoration Effect: The Case of Co/TiO₂ Catalyst. *Chem. Commun.* **2011**, *47*, 7131–7133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Hernández Mejía, C.; van Deelen, T.W.; de Jong, K.P. Activity Enhancement of Cobalt Catalysts by Tuning Metal-Support Interactions. *Nat. Commun.* **2018**, *9*, 4459. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14. van Deelen, T.W.; Hernández Mejía, C.; de Jong, K.P. Control of Metal-Support Interactions in Heterogeneous Catalysts to Enhance Activity and Selectivity. *Nat. Catal.* **2019**, *2*, 955–970. [CrossRef]

15. Van Ravenhorst, I.K.; Hoffman, A.S.; Vogt, C.; Boubnov, A.; Patra, N.; Oord, R.; Akatay, C.; Meirer, F.; Bare, S.R.; Weckhuysen, B.M. On the Cobalt Carbide Formation in a Co/TiO₂ Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Catalyst as Studied by High-Pressure, Long-Term Operando X-ray Absorption and Diffraction. *ACS Catal.* **2021**, *11*, 2956–2967. [CrossRef]

16. Qiu, C.; Odarchenko, Y.; Lezcano-Gonzalez, I.; Meng, Q.; Slater, T.; Xu, S.; Beale, A.M. Visualising Co Nanoparticle Aggregation and Encapsulation in Co/TiO₂ Catalysts and Its Mitigation through Surfactant Residues. *J. Catal.* **2023**, *419*, 58–67. [CrossRef]

17. Follath, R.; Hävecker, M.; Reichardt, G.; Lips, K.; Bahrdt, J.; Schäfers, F.; Schmid, P. The Energy Materials In-Situ Laboratory Berlin (EMIL) at BESSY II. *J. Phys. Conf. Ser.* **2013**, *425*, 212003. [CrossRef]

18. Knop-Gericke, A.; Kleimenov, E.; Hävecker, M.; Blume, R.; Teschner, D.; Zafeiratos, S.; Schlögl, R.; Bukhtiyarov, V.I.; Kaichev, V.V.; Prosvirin, I.P.; et al. Chapter 4 X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy for Investigation of Heterogeneous Catalytic Processes. *Adv. Catal.* **2009**, *52*, 213–272. [CrossRef]
19. Zhong, L.; Chen, D.; Zafeiratos, S. A Mini Review of in Situ Near-Ambient Pressure XPS Studies on Non-Noble, Late Transition Metal Catalysts. *Catal. Sci. Technol.* **2019**, *9*, 3851–3867. [CrossRef]

20. Carbonio, E.A.; Teschner, D. Catalysts at Work by Near-Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. *Catal. Sci. Ser.* **2023**, *21*, 265–382. [CrossRef]

21. Petzoldt, P.; Eder, M.; Mackewicz, S.; Blum, M.; Kratky, T.; Günther, S.; Tschurl, M.; Heiz, U.; Lechner, B.A.J. Tuning Strong Metal-Support Interaction Kinetics on Pt-Loaded TiO₂(110) by Choosing the Pressure: A Combined Ultrahigh Vacuum/Near-Ambient Pressure XPS Study. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2022**, *126*, 16127–16139. [CrossRef]

22. Papaefthimiou, V.; Dintzer, T.; Lebedeva, M.; Teschner, D.; Hävecker, M.; Knop-Gericke, A.; Schlögl, R.; Pierron-Bohnes, V.; Savinova, E.; Zafeiratos, S. Probing Metal-Support Interaction in Reactive Environments: An in Situ Study of PtCo Bimetallic Nanoparticles Supported on TiO₂. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2012**, *116*, 14342–14349. [CrossRef]

23. Figueiredo, W.T.; Prakash, R.; Vieira, C.G.; Lima, D.S.; Carvalho, V.E.; Soares, E.A.; Buchner, S.; Raschke, H.; Perez-Lopez, O.W.; Baptista, D.L.; et al. New Insights on the Electronic Factor of the SMSI Effect in Pd/TiO₂ Nanoparticles. *Appl. Surf. Sci.* **2022**, *574*, 151647. [CrossRef]

24. Le Berre, C.; Serp, P.; Messou, D. Method for Preparing a Supported Metal Catalyst, Catalyst Obtained According to This Method and Uses. Google Patents No. WO2021224576A1, 11 November 2021. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021224576A1/en (accessed on 6 September 2023).

25. Hendel, S.; Schäfers, F.; Hävecker, M.; Reichardt, G.; Scheer, M.; Bahrdt, J.; Lips, K. The EMIL Project at BESSY II: Beamline Design and Performance. *AIP Conf. Proc.* **2016**, *1741*, 030038.

26. Smekal, W.; Werner, W.S.M.; Powell, C.J. Simulation of Electron Spectra for Surface Analysis (SESSA): A Novel Software Tool for Quantitative Auger-Electron Spectroscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. *Surf. Interface Anal.* **2005**, *37*, 1059–1067. [CrossRef]

27. Zemlyanov, D.Y. Practical Aspects of XPS: From Sample Preparation to Spectra Interpretation. *Catal. Sci. Ser.* **2023**, *21*, 13–50. [CrossRef]

28. Abbate, M.; Goedkoop, J.B.; de Groot, F.M.F.; Grioni, M.; Fuggle, J.C.; Hofmann, S.; Petersen, H.; Sacchi, M. Probing Depth of Soft X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Measured in Total-Electron-Yield Mode. *Surf. Interface Anal.* **1992**, *18*, 65–69. [CrossRef]

29. Luo, W.; Zafeiratos, S. Tuning Morphology and Redox Properties of Cobalt Particles Supported on Oxides by an in between Graphene Layer. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2016**, *120*, 14130–14139. [CrossRef]

30. Turczyniak, S.; Luo, W.; Papaefthimiou, V.; Ramgir, N.S.S.; Haevecker, M.; MacHocki, A.; Zafeiratos, S. A Comparative Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron and Absorption Spectroscopy Study of Various Cobalt-Based Catalysts in Reactive Atmospheres. *Top. Catal.* **2016**, *59*, 532–542. [CrossRef]

31. Breeson, A.C.; Sankar, G.; Goh, G.K.L.; Palgrave, R.G. Phase Quantification by X-ray Photoemission Valence Band Analysis Applied to Mixed Phase TiO₂ Powders. *Appl. Surf. Sci.* **2017**, *423*, 205–209. [CrossRef]

32. Bettac, A.; Bansmann, J.; Senz, V.; Meiwes-Broer, K.H. Structure and Magnetism of Hcp(0001) and Fcc(001) Thin Cobalt Films on a Clean and Carbon-Reconstructed W(110) Surface. *Surf. Sci.* **2000**, *454–456*, 936–941. [CrossRef]

33. Cano-Casanova, L.; Ansón-Casaos, A.; Hernández-Ferrer, J.; Benito, A.M.; Maser, W.K.; Garro, N.; Lillo-Ródenas, M.A.; Román-Martínez, M.C. Surface-Enriched Boron-Doped TiO₂ Nanoparticles as Photocatalysts for Propene Oxidation. *ACS Appl. Nano Mater.* **2022**, *5*, 12527–12539. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Lu, N.; Quan, X.; Li, J.Y.; Chen, S.; Yu, H.T.; Chen, G. Fabrication of Boron-Doped TiO₂ Nanotube Array Electrode and Investigation of Its Photoelectrochemical Capability. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2007**, *111*, 11836–11842. [CrossRef]

35. Zhao, W.; Ma, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J.; Shuai, Z. Efficient Degradation of Toxic Organic Pollutants with Ni₂O₃/TiO₂-XBx under Visible Irradiation. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2004**, *126*, 4782–4783. [CrossRef]

36. Netskina, O.V.; Kochubey, D.I.; Prosvirin, I.P.; Malykhin, S.E.; Komova, O.V.; Kanazhevskiy, V.V.; Chukalkin, Y.G.; Bobrovskii, V.I.; Kellerman, D.G.; Ishchenko, A.V.; et al. Cobalt-Boron Catalyst for NaBH₄ Hydrolysis: The State of the Active Component Forming from Cobalt Chloride in a Reaction Medium. *Mol. Catal.* **2017**, *441*, 100–108. [CrossRef]

37. Wang, L.; Yue, H.; Hua, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Li, L. Highly Active Pt/NaxTiO₂ Catalyst for Low Temperature Formaldehyde Decomposition. *Appl. Catal. B* **2017**, *219*, 301–313. [CrossRef]

38. Yang, M.; Liu, J.; Lee, S.; Zugic, B.; Huang, J.; Allard, L.F.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. A Common Single-Site Pt(II)-O(OH)x-Species Stabilized by Sodium on "Active" and "Inert" Supports Catalyzes the Water-Gas Shift Reaction. *J. Am. Chem. Soc.* **2015**, *137*, 3470–3473. [CrossRef]

39. Cai, T.; Chen, X.; Johnson, J.K.; Wu, Y.; Ma, J.; Liu, D.; Liang, C. Understanding and Improving the Kinetics of Bulk Carbonation on Sodium Carbonate. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2020**, *124*, 23106–23115. [CrossRef]

40. Kong, D.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Von Lim, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, L.; Liu, B.; Chen, T.; Valdivia y Alvarado, P.; Yang, H.Y. Surface Modification of Na₂Ti₃O₇ Nanofibre Arrays Using N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots as Advanced Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Ultra-Stable and High-Rate Capability. *J. Mater. Chem. A Mater.* **2019**, *7*, 12751–12762. [CrossRef]

41. Zárate, R.A.; Fuentes, S.; Wiff, J.P.; Fuenzalida, V.M.; Cabrera, A.L. Chemical Composition and Phase Identification of Sodium Titanate Nanostructures Grown from Titania by Hydrothermal Processing. *J. Phys. Chem. Solids* **2007**, *68*, 628–637. [CrossRef]

42. Dozzi, M.V.; Artiglia, L.; Granozzi, G.; Ohtani, B.; Selli, E. Photocatalytic Activity vs Structural Features of Titanium Dioxide Materials Singly Doped or Codoped with Fluorine and Boron. *J. Phys. Chem. C* **2014**, *118*, 25579–25589. [CrossRef]
43. Zhong, L.; Kropp, T.; Baaziz, W.; Ersen, O.; Teschner, D.; Schlögl, R.; Mavrikakis, M.; Zafeiratos, S. Correlation between Reactivity and Oxidation State of Cobalt Oxide Catalysts for CO Preferential Oxidation. *ACS Catal.* **2019**, *9*, 8325–8336. [CrossRef]

44. Kucheyev, S.O.; Van Buuren, T.; Baumann, T.F.; Satcher, J.H.; Willey, T.M.; Meulenberg, R.W.; Felter, T.E.; Poco, J.F.; Gammon, S.A.; Terminello, L.J. Electronic Structure of Titania Aerogels from Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. *Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Phys.* **2004**, *69*, 245102. [CrossRef]

45. Qiao, L.; Xiao, H.Y.; Meyer, H.M.; Sun, J.N.; Rouleau, C.M.; Puretzky, A.A.; Geohegan, D.B.; Ivanov, I.N.; Yoon, M.; Weber, W.J.; et al. Nature of the Band Gap and Origin of the Electro-/Photo-Activity of Co₃O₄. *J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2013*, *1*, 4628–4633. [CrossRef]

46. Wang, W.; Wu, M.; Han, P.; Liu, Y.; He, L.; Huang, Q.; Wang, J.; Yan, W.; Fu, L.; Wu, Y. Understanding the Behavior and Mechanism of Oxygen-Deficient Anatase TiO₂ toward Sodium Storage. *ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces* **2019**, *11*, 3061–3069. [CrossRef]

47. Tanuma, S.; Powell, C.J.; Penn, D.R. Calculations of Electron Inelastic Mean Free Paths. V. Data for 14 Organic Compounds over the 50–2000 EV Range. *Surf. Interface Anal.* **1994**, *21*, 165–176. [CrossRef]

48. Briggs, D.; Seah, M.P. (Eds.) *Practical Surface Analysis, Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy*; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996; Volume 1, ISBN 0471953407.

**Disclaimer/Publisher's Note:** The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.