# Separation of Channels Subserving Approach and Avoidance/Escape at the Level of the Basal Ganglia and Related Brainstem Structures

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Véronique Coizet¹,*, Racha Al Tannir¹, Arnaud Pautrat¹ and Paul G. Overton²

¹Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, University Grenoble Alpes, Bâtiment E.J. Safra - Chemin Fortuné Ferrini - 38700 La Tronche France; ²Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

## ARTICLE HISTORY

Received: December 09, 2022

Revised: March 23, 2023

Accepted: March 29, 2023

DOI:

10.2174/1570159X21666230818154903

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

CrossMark

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Abstract:** The basal ganglia have the key function of directing our behavior in the context of events from our environment and/or our internal state. This function relies on afferents targeting the main input structures of the basal ganglia, entering bids for action selection at the level of the striatum or signals for behavioral interruption at the level of the subthalamic nucleus, with behavioral reselection facilitated by dopamine signaling. Numerous experiments have studied action selection in relation to inputs from the cerebral cortex. However, less is known about the anatomical and functional link between the basal ganglia and the brainstem. In this review, we describe how brainstem structures also project to the main input structures of the basal ganglia, namely the striatum, the subthalamic nucleus and midbrain dopaminergic neurons, in the context of approach and avoidance (including escape from threat), two fundamental, mutually exclusive behavioral choices in an animal's repertoire in which the brainstem is strongly involved. We focus on three particularly well-described loci involved in approach and avoidance, namely the superior colliculus, the parabrachial nucleus and the periaqueductal grey nucleus. We consider what is known about how these structures are related to the basal ganglia, focusing on their projections toward the striatum, dopaminergic neurons and subthalamic nucleus, and explore the functional consequences of those interactions.

**Keywords:** Basal ganglia, cerebral cortex, brainstem, neurotransmitter, striatum, approach and avoidance.

## 1. INTRODUCTION

The basal ganglia have been suggested to have an important role in selecting actions for a given context, with bids for selection coming via inputs from many structures [1]. Numerous experiments have studied action selection in relation to inputs from the cerebral cortex. However, from an evolutionary point of view, the basal ganglia are ancient structures. They appear in the nervous systems of all classes of jawed vertebrates [2, 3] and possibly in all vertebrates [4]. Most importantly, their cell types, intrinsic neurochemistry and patterns of connectivity have been highly conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. This means that the basal ganglia, in more or less their present form, were in place prior to the evolution of the cerebral cortex. We might, therefore, expect subcortical sensorimotor structures to be connected to the basal ganglia like that of the later evolving cortical sensorimotor regions and share a functional role in the basal ganglia action selection alongside the cortex [5]. Despite this, less is known about the anatomical and functional link between the basal ganglia and the brainstem. The

brainstem is classically described as a major target of the basal ganglia via their output nuclei [6]. In this review, we describe how brainstem structures also project to the main input structures of the basal ganglia, namely the striatum, the subthalamic nucleus and midbrain dopaminergic neurons, in the context of approach and avoidance (including escape from threat), two fundamental, mutually exclusive behavioral choices in an animal's repertoire in which the brainstem is strongly involved [5]. After a brief description of the basal ganglia and its role in action selection, we will focus on three particularly well-described loci involved in approach and avoidance, namely the superior colliculus, the parabrachial nucleus and the periaqueductal grey nucleus. We consider what is known about how these structures are related to the basal ganglia, focusing on their projections toward the striatum, dopaminergic neurons and subthalamic nucleus, and explore the functional consequences of those interactions.

## 2. THE BASAL GANGLIA

### 2.1. Anatomy of the Basal Ganglia

The basal ganglia are a group of interconnected subcortical nuclei that represent one of the brain's fundamental processing units. The basal ganglia are a loosely grouped collection of sub cortical nuclei derived from the telencephalon

<footnote>*Address correspondence to this author at the Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, University Grenoble Alpes, Bâtiment E.J. Safra - Chemin Fortuné Ferrini - 38700 La Tronche, France; Tel: +33 4 56 52 05 99 (secr); Fax: +33 4 56 52 05 98; E-mail: veronique.coizet@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr</footnote>
and midbrain, located deep within each cerebral hemisphere. The principal components of the basal ganglia are the striatum (caudate nucleus, the putamen and ventral striatum), the subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus and substantia nigra (pars reticulata and pars compacta).

The main “input” components of the basal ganglia are the striatum and the subthalamic nucleus [7]. Afferent connections to both structures originate from virtually the entire cerebral cortex (including motor, sensory, association and limbic areas) [8], from the mid-line and intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus and the limbic system (principally the amygdala and hippocampus). These connections are excitatory, intermittently active, and use glutamate as a neurotransmitter [9-11].

The main “output nuclei” of the basal ganglia are the substantia nigra (pars reticulata) and the entopeduncular nucleus (internal segment of the globus pallidus in primates). These structures provide extensively branched efferents to the thalamus (which in turn projects back to the cerebral cortex) and pre-motor areas of the brainstem, including the superior colliculus, the periaqueductal grey nucleus, the parabrachial nucleus, the pedunculopontine/cuneiform area, and widespread regions of the mesencephalic/medullary reticular formation [6, 12-14]. Most output projections are tonically active and inhibitory and use GABA as a neurotransmitter.

The “intrinsic connections” of the basal ganglia are organized so that phasic input entering the system can either decrease or increase the tonic inhibitory effect that the GABAergic output nuclei have on their target structures [15]. Selective disinhibition of areas receiving inputs from basal ganglia output structures is promoted by direct inhibitory connections between striatal cells and the output nuclei, suppressing tonic output firing (“direct pathway”) and thereby releases output targets in the thalamus and brainstem from being tonically inhibited. In contrast, external afferents to the subthalamic nucleus (the “hyper-direct pathway”), which projects directly via excitatory connections to the output nuclei, can increase the level of tonic inhibitory control over the thalamus and brainstem [16]. Tonic inhibitory control can also be increased when subthalamic nucleus activity is increased following striatal inhibition of inputs from the external globus pallidus (“indirect pathway”). Further intrinsic processing is provided by dopaminergic projections from the ventral midbrain (substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area) to the striatum. Mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons, in turn, receive a direct inhibitory projection from the striatum and excitatory input from the subthalamic nucleus.

## 2.2. Basal Ganglia and Action Selection - Role of Striatal Input

It has been suggested that the basal ganglia provide the vertebrate brain with a solution to a selection problem that arises whenever two or more competing functional neural systems (e.g., subserving energy balance and defence in the context of the present review) seek simultaneous access to a restricted motor resource (behavioural output) [1]. Considering several computational selections, architectures suggest significant advantages for systems incorporating a central switching mechanism. Therefore, it has been proposed that

the vertebrate basal ganglia have evolved as a centralized selection device, specialized in resolving conflicts over access to limited motor resources (and, by extension, cognitive and emotional resources) [1]. Analysis of basal ganglia functional architecture and its position within a wider anatomical framework suggests it can satisfy many of the requirements expected of an efficient selection mechanism.

Current views of information processing within the basal ganglia are heavily influenced by the suggestion of “multiple parallel channels” e.g., [8]. These channels originate in the cerebral cortex, project *via* topographically segregated pathways to the striatum, through the basal ganglia nuclei, and return *via* a thalamic relay to the cortex region from which the specific corticostriatal projections originated. The model assumes that the internal circuitry of the basal ganglia is configured so that, at the level of output nuclei (e.g., the substantia nigra pars reticulata), selected channels are inhibited while non-selected channels are excited. Because of the inhibitory nature of the basal ganglia output, targets of selected channels will be disinhibited while inhibition on non-selected channels is maintained or increased. In this manner, activity in the most actively supported (salient) functional system will be sustained, and its direct link with the motor systems will be unblocked. Conversely, less well-supported functional systems will be inhibited, and their access to the motor systems will be denied. In other words, the functional system (i.e., hunger, thirst or defense) with the most salient sensory and contextual inputs will have its channels selected in the basal ganglia and its outputs selectively disinhibited. Consequently, the problem of access to restricted behavioral resources will be resolved on a winner-take-all basis. This idea has been extended by suggesting that the basal ganglia can decide between competing systems, not only represented in the cerebral cortex but also between those in the evolutionarily older brainstem [5]. Based mainly on anatomical evidence, we suggested that many subcortical structures that can guide movements, such as the superior colliculus, the parabrachial nucleus or the periaqueductal grey nucleus, also have connections with the basal ganglia that may represent a series of parallel, at least partially closed-loops. In contrast with the cortico-basal ganglia loops, the subcortical loops have a thalamic relay on the input rather than on the return-link of the circuit.

## 2.3. Basal Ganglia and Action Selection - Role of Dopaminergic Input

Dopaminergic neurons located in the substantia nigra pars compacta, and the ventral tegmental area are sensitive to unexpected, biologically salient stimuli, including those associated with reward [17]. If the presentation of a reward is reliably predicted by another stimulus, such as a light or a tone, the burst of activity gradually transfers from the reward to the predicted stimulus. Once a conditioned response has been established and the predicting stimulus is not followed by the expected reward, a reliable depression in the spontaneous activity of the dopaminergic neurons is observed shortly after the expected reward delivery. It has been suggested that these dopaminergic bursts or pauses are respectively signaling when something better or worse than expected is occurring, representing a reward prediction error [18]. More recently, a new hypothesis further developed this
idea and proposes that rather than directly reinforcing re-
sponses that lead to reward in the Thorndike 'Law of effect'
sense as implied by the concept of reward prediction error,
the short-latency dopamine signal enables the basal ganglia
to discriminate unexpected sensory events in the world that
may have been caused by actions of the agent from those
resulting from other sources [19]. Indeed, through behav-
ioural repetition, the basal ganglia may assist in developing
entirely new actions with specific positive or negative senso-
ry outcomes. Phasic dopamine signals reinforce the reselec-
tion of actions that immediately precede an unpredicted bio-
logically salient event (phasic dopamine bursts) or dismiss
the selection of actions that immediately precede a negative
outcome (phasic dopamine inhibition). This form of learning
in the basal ganglia may be a critical part of the mechanism
by which the brain accumulates a 'library' of action-outcome
associations, which, on later occasions, can be dynamically
configured to select actions / behavioral sequences leading to
the best rewarding effect.

## 2.4. Basal Ganglia and Action Selection - Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus Input

As described previously, the subthalamic nucleus is also
a major input structure of the basal ganglia. In the context of
the action-selection model, it has been suggested that rapid
control of the subthalamic nucleus *via* the hyper-direct path-
way is of great importance [20]. Indeed, it should be as-
sumed that once the most salient action has been selected, it
will remain in competition with more bids entering from
other functional brain systems, and one of them may become
the most salient one. Therefore, to be able to switch from the
old selected action to the new one, the ongoing action must
first be halted before allowing the new action to start. The
subthalamic nucleus seems to fulfill all the requirements for
this purpose [16]. The structure receives widespread connec-
tions from many brain regions, including cortical motor areas
and the thalamus, but also from subcortical sensorimotor
structures such as the superior colliculus, the parabrachial
nucleus and the periaqueductal grey nucleus [21-24]. The
evidence reviewed by Mink [10] and Smith [25] suggests
that corollary signals directed to the subthalamic nucleus
produce a rapid and diffuse excitation of the basal ganglia
output nuclei prior to the arrival of more focused disinhibito-
ry signals from the striatum [26, 27]. This temporary excita-
tory effect on the output nuclei could dispel the disinhibitory
activity associated with current selections and send a brief
wave of inhibition to the brainstem and thalamic targets of
the basal ganglia. Therefore, the outcome would be to inter-
rupt or pause ongoing actions and establish circumstances in
which a new selection may be more easily imposed. In the
context of this review, an animal engaged in an approach
behavior for feeding should cease this action in response to
an attack by a predator to select a more appropriate defensive
behavior from inputs/bids to the striatum.

## 2.5. Basal Ganglia and Action Selection - Summary

The basal ganglia have the key function of directing our
behavior in the context of events from our environment
and/or our internal state. We have seen that this function
relies on afferents targeting the main input structures of the
basal ganglia, entering bids for action selection at the level of

the striatum or signals for behavioral interruption at the level
of the subthalamic nucleus, with behavioral reselection facil-
itated by dopamine signaling. In the next sections, we will
describe the current knowledge concerning how brainstem
structures such as the superior colliculus, the parabrachial
nucleus and the periaqueductal grey nucleus project to these
main input nuclei of the basal ganglia to explore the func-
tional consequences of those interactions in the context of
approach/avoidance behavior.

# 3. THE SUPERIOR COLICULUS

## 3.1. Functional Anatomy of the Superior Colliculus

The superior colliculus is one of the most well-studied
brainstem structures. The colliculus has a layered organiza-
tion due to the distribution of the fibers and variation in the
size and density of neurons [28]. It is composed of seven
layers that are grouped into two divisions. The dorsal super-
ficial layers are almost exclusively visual and receive visual
inputs directly from retinal ganglion cells [29-30] and indi-
rectly from the striate cortex [31]. The ventral intermediate
and deep layers are multi-modal and process visual signals
from the superficial layers as well as somatosensory and
auditory input [32]. Both divisions contain a topographic
map of the visual field but neurons from the intermediate and
deep layers have wider receptive fields [32]. For both divi-
sions, the upper field is represented medially in the collicu-
lus, from which avoidance/escape responses are elicited. The
lower field is represented laterally, from where orienting
responses are elicited [29, 33-35]. In rats and mice, unex-
pected stimuli appearing in the upper visual field are likely
to be predators, and therefore avoidance/escape is the most
adaptive reflexive behavioral response. In contrast, unex-
pected stimuli in the lower visual field are more likely to be
food or offspring; hence, the approach is the most adaptive
reflexive behavioral response.

In the primate, extensive literature associates the deep
and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus with orient-
ing of the head and eyes [36-40]. However, microinjection of
the GABA<sub>A</sub> antagonist bicuculline into the intermediate and
deep layers of the colliculus in macaques has been reported
to elicit cowering, escape-like behavior, high-pitched vocali-
zation, and attack of objects [41]. Although the authors re-
port that responses could be elicited from both medial and
lateral aspects of the structure [41], the spread of injection
was reasonably large (3 mm diameter at 1 hour) *versus* the
width of the macaque colliculus (~5 mm), which leaves open
the possibility of inclusion of the medial colliculus in most if
not all injections. That said, the ecological niche of the ma-
caque is very different from the rat and mouse, so functional
specialization in the mediolateral axis may not be relevant.
Although avoidance/escape responses have not been explicit-
ly reported following collicular stimulation in other species,
the colliculus in a wide range of species contains neurons
sensitive to looming stimuli (pigeon optic tectum, [42], frog
optic tectum, [43], mouse, [44], cat, [45], humans, [46]),
which indirectly suggests a role in avoidance/escape.

Approach and avoidance/escape at the level of the supe-
rior colliculus are modulated by differential inputs to the
lateral and medial areas in the rat [47]. Small injections of
the retrograde tracer Fluorogold into the medial or lateral
areas of the intermediate and deep layers of the colliculus
revealed that there are a number of structures that only pro-
ject to the medial (e.g., retrosplenial cortex, temporal associ-
ation cortex, lateral geniculate and supra geniculate thalamic
nuclei, ventromedial and pre mammillary hypothalamic nu-
clei) or lateral (e.g., primary somatosensory cortex represent-
ing upper body parts and vibrissae and parvocellular reticular
nucleus in the brainstem) colliculus. Other structures were
found to project both medial and lateral areas but from topo-
graphically segregated populations of neurons (e.g., zona
incerta and substantia nigra pars reticulata).

As well as segregation at the afferent level, in rats, cells
in the intermediate and deep colliculus give rise to segregat-
ed outputs – the lateral intermediate/deep layers give rise to
projections that cross midline (the ‘contralateral descending
pathway’), while the medial intermediate/ deep layers give
rise to projections that do not cross the midline (the ‘ipsilat-
eral descending pathway’, [48]. The contralateral descending
pathway projects caudally via the predorsal bundle to the
contralateral medial pontomedullary reticular formation and
upper cervical spinal cord. The ipsilateral descending path-
way projects to the cuneiform nucleus and ventrolateral
pontomedullary reticular formation [49, 50]. In addition to
the descending projections of the superior colliculus, it is
now clear that the lateral and medial intermediate and deep
layers also send non-overlapping ascending projections to
areas of the thalamus, which in turn project differentially to
the striatum (see below).

## 3.2. Subcortical Loop between the Superior Colliculus and the Basal Ganglia

The subcortical loops described earlier have been charac-
terized at the level of the superior colliculus by McHaffie
and colleagues [5] according to the superficial/intermediate
and deep layers subdivisions. Here we will describe how
loops can also be found based on the other major functional
subdivision of the superior colliculus into medial/lateral as-
pects involved in avoidance/approach, respectively.

Tract tracing studies using anterograde tracers have con-
firmed that the intermediate and deep layers of the superior
colliculus project to the parafascicular, rostral intralaminar
(the central lateral, paracentral and central medial nuclei) and
ventromedial nuclei of the thalamus [51]. However, more
detailed investigations indicate a more specific organization
from the colliculus to the thalamus when considering its lat-
eral and medial aspects. In summary, evidence suggests that
efferents from the lateral and medial aspects of the colliculus
form part of independent loops that traverse the thalamus,
striatum and substantia nigra pars reticulata, returning to the
colliculus *via* the nigro-tectal projection to complete the
loops. We will now consider those loops in more detail using
retrograde tracers [52], the parafascicular, rostral in-
tralaminar and ventromedial nuclei of the thalamus all re-
ceive input from the lateral portion of the ipsilateral collicu-
lus, primarily from the intermediate layers. These projections
have also been confirmed electrophysiologically. Yamasaki
and Krauthammer [53] antidromically activated cells in the
intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus by
stimulation of the parafascicular nucleus and centrolateral
nucleus in the rat. We have shown that anterograde labeling

of thalamic fibers is extensive in the striatum following BDA
injections into the rostral intralaminar nuclei [54]. Staining is
seen primarily in the mid to lateral regions of the anterior
striatum. Striatal staining is also extensive following injec-
tions into the parafascicular nucleus, with labeling seen
throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the striatum. These
findings echo those reported by Pan *et al.* [55] and Schwab
*et al.* [56]. In the rat, clear, dense patches of fibers are also
observed in the lateral regions of the striatum as a result of
injections into the ventromedial thalamic nucleus, con-
trasting with the preferential projection into the medial stria-
tal regions in the mouse [55]. So, evidence is clear that the
lateral colliculus in the rat projects through the parafascicular
nucleus, rostral intralaminar nuclei and the ventromedial
nucleus to the striatum.

Our own work [54] in the rat has confirmed previous
reports of thalamic projections from the lateral colliculus and
extended these findings to the medial aspect of the structure.
Medial injections of an anterograde tracer result in very light
staining in the dorsal parafascicular nucleus and dorsal ros-
tral intralaminar nuclei. We have confirmed these antero-
grade findings by iontophoretic administration of the retro-
grade tracer Fluorogold. This clearly suggests that the medial
colliculus may have other thalamic targets to reach the stria-
tum. We have found that injections of anterograde tracer into
the intermediate and deep layers of the medial colliculus
label the posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus [54]. Ionto-
phoretic injection of Fluorogold into the posterior in-
tralaminar thalamic nucleus gives rise to a large amount of
retrograde labelling in the medial colliculus with the densest
patches in the medial intermediate and deep layers. In terms
of projections forward to the striatum, injections of the retro-
grade tracer Fluorogold into the caudal striatum label the
posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus, whereas injections
into the rostral striatum do not. Anterograde labeling in the
striatum from an iontophoretic injection of BDA into the
posterior intralaminar thalamic nucleus confirmed a projec-
tion to the very caudal tail of the striatum [57, 58], suggested
to be processing specific aversive signals [59]. The caudal
striatum onto which the medial colliculus is projecting ap-
pears to be an area that is structurally and functionally sepa-
rate from the rest of the striatum. Here, there appears to be a
substance-P rich band where medium spiny projection neu-
rons almost exclusively express D1-type dopamine receptors
and an enkephalin/substance-P poor band where medium
spiny projection neurons almost exclusively express D2-type
dopamine receptors [60, 61]. Experiments in the monkey
suggest that this area of the striatum (the ‘tail’ of the striatum
in the monkey) has different functions than the head of the
striatum [62, 63]. Interestingly, in keeping with a functional
focus on avoidance/escape, dopaminergic neurons projecting
to the tail do not encode reward value but instead, appear to
play a role in the avoidance of threatening stimuli [64]. Fur-
thermore, optogenetic inhibition of the caudal striatum
blocks looming-induced freezing in mice [65].

The caudal striatum projects to the lateral edge of the zona
reticulata region of the substantia nigra and the pars lateralis
[66]. Cells of origin of the nigrotectal tract in the pars lateralis
project to the medial colliculus [67], at least partially closing
the loop. The extensive areas of the striatum that form the
projection target of the parafascicular nucleus, rostral in-
tralaminar nuclei and the ventromedial nucleus innervate
widespread areas of the reticulata [66], which in turn projects
to the lateral colliculus [67], again at least partially closing the
loop. The pathways linking the medial and lateral colliculus to
the thalamus and striatum are illustrated in Fig. (1A).

In parallel with the action selection bids from the superi-
or colliculus to the striatum routed through the thalamus, the
colliculus also interacts with the basal ganglia in two other
important ways: *via* dopaminergic neurons in the substantia
nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area
(VTA), and the subthalamic nucleus. Unlike the projections
operating *via* the thalamus, the projections to the SNc and
the subthalamic nucleus (at least in the rat) are from a more
restricted area of the colliculus.

3.3. Superior Colliculus Projections to Dopaminergic Neurons

Our group has revealed a direct projection from the supe-
rior colliculus to the SNc and the VTA, which we have
shown to relay visual information to these structures [68-70].
We have also shown that this pathway is complex, involving
presumed excitatory (the majority) and inhibitory (the minor-
ity) components. It provides afferents to both dopaminergic
and non-dopaminergic neurons in the area [69], which may
underlie excitatory and inhibitory responses in dopaminergic
neurons in both the SNc and the VTA [70]. While not high-
lighted in our previous publications, following injections of
anterograde tracers such as PHA-L or BDA into the collicu-
lus, terminals within the SNc were much more numerous
when the tracers were injected in a specific subregion of the
superior colliculus located in the deep lateral part of this
structure [69].

The existence of the ‘tectorial pathway’ and ‘tecto-VTA’
pathway has been confirmed in other species, such as mice
[71, 72], cats [73] and primates [74], with cells of origin in
the deep and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus.
Interestingly, a detailed investigation of these pathways
made by Huang and colleagues [71] showed that the majority
of superior colliculus cells projecting to the dopaminergic
neurons are glutamatergic (~ 92%) with some GABAergic
cells (GAD2+ cells), and that specific activation of these
pathways using optogenetics triggers dopamine release in the
striatum. Furthermore, specific modulation of the tectonigral
pathway using optogenetics favors orienting behavior in
mice, regulating appetitive locomotion in predatory hunting
without affecting the avoidance behavior [71]. In terms of
the dichotomy between approach and avoidance/escape, ac-
tivating the tecto-VTA pathway favors orienting responses,
and a long-lasting phasic activation of the tecto-VTA path-
way promotes head/body movements [72]. Overall, these
anatomical and behavioral results suggest that the tecto-
nigral and tecto-VTA pathways mainly subserve approach/
appetitive functions, as might be anticipated, given their
origin in the lateral part of the colliculus.

It has been suggested that phasic dopamine signals have a
role in discovering novel actions [19]. The work from Vau-
telle and colleagues [75] presented in this special issue high-
lights the role of the visual input from the colliculus to do-
paminergic neurons in potentiating motor signals arriving at
the striatum. Visually-induced dopamine release in the stria-

tum following a motor action has been suggested to have a
reinforcing function [76]. Since this dopamine release is
generated by a pathway that is mainly involved in the trans-
mission of approach or appetitive signals, it is likely that the
function of collicular-induced dopamine release mainly sub-
serves a positive reinforcement function. The pathways link-
ing the medial and lateral colliculus to the SNc and VTA are
illustrated in Fig. (1B).

3.4. Superior Colliculus Projections to the Subthalamic Nucleus

Tokuno and colleagues [21] were the first groups to raise
the issue that many studies were centered on the role of the
output nuclei of the basal ganglia in the control of the supe-
rior colliculus, but none seemed to have paid attention to the
direct influence the colliculus may have on the basal ganglia.
Using anterograde and retrograde tract-tracing neuroanato-
my, they described a direct projection between the colliculus
and the subthalamic nucleus arising mainly from the middle
to caudal parts of the deep layers and terminating in the dor-
sal part of the subthalamic nucleus. In this work, the tecto-
subthalamic pathway did not appear to provide a particularly
strong input to the subthalamic nucleus. However, whilst
investigating the tecto-nigral and tecto-VTA pathways de-
scribed above, we noticed the presence of a denser layer of
terminals in the dorsal part of the subthalamic nucleus previ-
ously described by Tokuno and colleagues [21]. We then
characterized the topography of this pathway and found that
in order to label the pathway, the anterograde tracer has to be
injected in the very lateral part of the intermediate and deep
layers of the colliculus to produce the densest terminal label-
ing in the subthalamic nucleus [22]. We also went on to
show that this pathway is largely excitatory since collicular
terminals make asymmetric synaptic contacts within the dor-
sal and rostral part of the subthalamic nucleus, and activation
of this pathway using visual stimuli has an excitatory effect
on subthalamic cells [22]. This pathway has recently been
confirmed to be a bilateral projection in the rat [24].

In the context of the action-selection model previously
described, as has already been mentioned, the rapid control
of the subthalamic nucleus by afferent structures is important
[20]. In that regard, the link between the superior colliculus
and the subthalamic nucleus is likely to be of particular func-
tional significance. The colliculus can be compared to a
"novelty detector": any unexpected event happening in the
environment is likely to phasically activate this structure at a
short latency [77]. The transmission of this information to
the subthalamic nucleus is crucial as those novel events may
be of vital importance to the animal and require a change of
behavioural output in response to them. Similar to the tecto-
nigral and tecto-VTA pathways, the cells of the origin of the
text-subthalamic pathway are also localized in the very lat-
eral part of the intermediate and deep layers of the colliculus.
While to date, no specific optogenetic study has been con-
ducted manipulating this pathway to fully evaluate its behav-
ioral effects, given the position of the cells of origin in the
colliculus and the functions ascribed to its lateral aspect, the
visual signals to the subthalamic nucleus are likely to operate
within appetitive/approach context. The pathways linking the
medial and lateral colliculus to the subthalamic nucleus are
illustrated in Fig. (1C).
<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>B. Superior colliculus projection to the dopaminergic neurons</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>C. Superior colliculus projection to the subthalamic nucleus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /></figure>

**Fig. (1).** Schematic illustration of the projections from the superior colliculus to the striatum *via* the thalamus (A) (note that the densest projections are represented), to the dopaminergic neurons (B) and to the subthalamic nucleus (C). (*A higher resolution/colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article*).

**3.5. Links between the Superior Colliculus and the Basal Ganglia - Summary**

In summary, the superior colliculus is in a position to contribute to basal ganglia action selection *via* inputs that subserve approach and avoidance/escape functions. This is partially achieved *via* projections to the thalamus, which then relays information to the striatum. The striatum then, in turn, projects to the substantia nigra pars reticulata and then back to the colliculus in what has been described as subcortical loops [5]. These collicular projections to the thalamus cover both approach and avoidance/escape. However, other inputs

to the basal ganglia, from the colliculus to the dopaminergic neurons of the ventral midbrain and the subthalamic nucleus, are more selective. The SNc/VTA and subthalamic nucleus receive signals from the approach-specific part of the colliculus, at least in the rat. What this suggests is that fast avoidance/escape signals may be provided by other brainstem structures. According to the literature, we identified two other candidates processing signals relevant to avoidance/escape, which share similar connectivity with the basal ganglia as the colliculus, namely the parabrachial nucleus and the periaqueductal grey nucleus.
# 4. THE PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS

## 4.1. Functional Anatomy of the Parabrachial Nucleus

The parabrachial nucleus is located in the dorsolateral pons and surrounds the superior cerebellar peduncle as it enters the brainstem from the cerebellum [78, 79]. Until the end of the 80s, the parabrachial nucleus was known as the gustative pontine nucleus [80, 81]. It has since been shown to be involved in hunger, cardio-vascular regulation, respiration, wakefulness control and thermoregulation [82-87]. The parabrachial nucleus is, therefore, a central structure supporting the organism's general homeostasis [88, 89]. Importantly in the present context, the parabrachial nucleus also generates autonomic responses following the occurrence of painful stimuli [90, 91] and processes nociceptive information [92-94]. This structure is a major target for nociceptive neurons located in layers I-II in the spinal cord. In the cat, it has been estimated that 6000 spinal neurons project to the parabrachial nucleus in comparison to 1500 neurons for the spinothalamic tract [95]. Spinal neurons send a bilateral projection to the lateral part of the parabrachial nucleus, with a predominance to the contralateral side [96]. Pain clearly plays a role in both avoidance and escape.

The lateral parabrachial nucleus has been shown to be rich in neurons positive for the neurochemical marker calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which is usually found in visceral nociceptive pathways [89]. Through the projections of these neurons to limbic structures such as the amygdala, hypothalamus, and insular cortex, CGRP neurons from the lateral parabrachial nucleus have a crucial role in the emotional component of pain [94, 97-99]. CGRP neurons in the parabrachial nucleus have been suggested to function as a general alarm system to maintain homeostasis, with pain being one of the most important contexts [89, 100]. Accordingly, it has been shown that CGRP neurons in the parabrachial nucleus are involved in the development of aversive and defense behavior [101-103] but are poorly involved in the precise location of the painful stimuli due to their large receptive fields [104]. In addition, tachykinin 1 positive neurons in this structure have also been found to modulate nocifensive behaviors [102, 105]. Overall, the parabrachial nucleus is a structure that can to encode the presence of something dangerous and promote affective behavioral states that limit the harm in response to potential threats [106]. Indeed, it has been recognized as a hub for pain and aversion [107]. This subcortical structure could contribute to basal ganglia action selection by providing selective avoidance/escape bids for expression that parallel the selective approach-related inputs to the SNc and subthalamic nucleus provided by the superior colliculus.

## 4.2. Subcortical Loop between the Parabrachial Nucleus and the Basal Ganglia

The subcortical loops described by McHaffie and colleagues [5] mainly involved the superior colliculus. However, the authors suggested that other midbrain and hindbrain structures, including the parabrachial nucleus or the periaqueductal gray nucleus, also have the potential to provide input to the striatum and hence the basal ganglia *via* a relay in the midline intralaminar complex of the thalamus. Similar to the superior colliculus, the parabrachial nucleus is also

subdivided into different subnuclei, each with its own unique set of efferent projections, especially toward the thalamus, which may thus represent different channels toward the striatum [108-110]. The parabrachial nucleus can be broadly divided into two main regions, the lateral and the medial parabrachial, according to their afferent inputs. The medial parabrachial has been implicated in gustatory functions *via* its innervation from the gustatory region of the nucleus of the solitary tract and cerebral cortex [111], while, as seen previously, the lateral parabrachial is generally involved in nociception through nociceptive input from the spinal cord, the visceral fibers from the nucleus of the solitary tract and the amygdala [91, 112-114]. Both regions preferentially project to different thalamic areas. The medial parabrachial nucleus densely innervates areas of the intralaminar thalamus, such as the lateral and medial part of the parafascicular nucleus, while the lateral parabrachial nucleus densely innervates the midline thalamic area, such as the paraventricular and inter mediodorsal nuclei [110]. The paracentral thalamic nucleus is the exclusive target of a specific subnucleus located in the dorsal region of the lateral parabrachial, the internal lateral parabrachial nucleus, which conveys and encodes cutaneous nociceptive information from layer V/VI of the spinal cord [115, 116]. More recently, ascending pathways from the lateral and medial parabrachial nucleus have been further analyzed according to their molecular identity [117]. The authors have shown the diversity of subclusters of neurons within each subregion of the PBN with specific patterns of projections [117]. As previously discussed in relation to the superior colliculus, these thalamic nuclei are known to then project to the striatum. The parabrachial nucleus is also a major target of the basal ganglia output structures, at least the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) [13-118], closing the parabrachial - basal ganglia loop. Unlike the superior colliculus, the functional link between the basal ganglia and the parabrachial nucleus in the context of taste-guided behavior, such as conditioned taste aversion/preference or response to potential threats, to our knowledge, has never been considered and studied. The pathways linking the parabrachial nucleus to the thalamus and striatum are illustrated in Fig. (2A).

## 4.3. Parabrachial Nucleus Projections to Dopaminergic Neurons

Experiments on SNc/VTA dopaminergic neurons classically report that these cells exhibit a short latency, short duration phasic excitation to unpredicted stimuli that are salient through their novelty and intensity or their reward value [119-121]. Importantly, in various mammals, they also exhibit a short latency phasic decrease of activity when an expected reward fails to appear or in response to noxious/aversive stimuli [121-124]. Our group raised the fact that while much was known about many aspects of the ascending dopamine systems, surprisingly, little was known about the sensory inputs that phasically modulate their activity [123]. Our tract tracing neuroanatomy experiments revealed a direct projection between the parabrachial nucleus and the SNc/VTA. We found that the general distribution of retrogradely labelled cells in the parabrachial nucleus was similar following an injection of a retrograde tracer in the lateral and central part of the SNc or the VTA, suggesting
that the projection appears to innervate the whole dopamine-
containing region. These parabrachial – SNc/VTA cells were
found in all subnuclei of both the lateral and medial parts of
the parabrachial nucleus, with no clear presence of a topo-
graphical organization. However, a significantly greater den-
sity of cells was labelled in the nociceptive lateral part of the
parabrachial nucleus compared to the medial part, especially
within the rostral and caudal areas of this structure [125].

We have also shown that inactivating the parabrachial
nucleus pharmacologically attenuates, and in some cases
eliminates, nociceptive responses of dopaminergic neurons
located in the SNc [125]. Altogether, we have demonstrated
that the parabrachial nucleus is a substantial source of noci-
ceptive signals to midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Although
the existence of a pathway linking the parabrachial nucleus
to the SNc/VTA has subsequently been confirmed [126-
128], our results raised two intriguing issues. The first is the
fact that activating parabrachial cells generates an inhibitory
response in dopaminergic neurons, although parabrachial
projecting neurons are unlikely to be GABAergic in nature.
Indeed, the lateral parabrachial – VTA projection seems to
mainly consist of glutamatergic neurons [126-128]. The se-
cond is that the delay between parabrachial activation and
dopaminergic inhibition appears long (~ 50 ms), especially
in the context of nociception (mean ± SEM: 9.2 ± 0.4 ms for
activation of the parabrachial nucleus vs. 58.7 ± 2.9 ms for
activation of cells in the VTA). Some light has been cast on
these issues by recent studies. Yang and colleagues [127]
have suggested that neurons from the lateral parabrachial
nucleus indirectly inhibit VTA dopaminergic neurons by
activating GABAergic neurons in the VTA, which may ex-
plain the delay between the parabrachial and SNc/VTA re-
sponses. They studied the functional connectivity between
the lateral parabrachial nucleus and the dopaminergic / GA-
BAergic cells in the VTA as well as GABAergic cells in the
SNr. They have found that optogenetic excitation of the par-
abrachial-VTA glutamatergic pathway induced large excita-
tory post-synaptic currents in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-
positive, presumed dopaminergic neurons and TH nega-
tive/vesicular GABA transporter-positive neurons in the SNr,
but not in GABAergic neurons in the VTA.

A direct projection between the parabrachial nucleus and the SNr had previously been described in the rat [13] and further studied by Yang and colleagues in mice [127] in order to understand its role in the inhibitory response of VTA dopaminergic neurons following parabrachial activation. SNr neurons are mainly excited at short latency by noxious stimulation, which will exert an inhibitory influence on parabrachial neurons projecting to the VTA. Yang et al. [127] hypothesized that inhibiting parabrachial neurons targeted by the SNr in response to noxious stimuli inhibits VTA dopaminergic neurons through a feed-forward inhibition between the parabrachial nucleus and the SNr. However, this indirect inhibition may also involve the projection between the parabrachial nucleus and the rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg)/tail of the VTA [129], a unique GABAergic afferent to the midbrain dopaminergic neurons connected to numerous structures involved in aversive learning and punishment, including the parabrachial nucleus. It has been shown that the parabrachial nucleus projection to the RMTg/tail of the VTA specifically transmits information about the punish-

ment signals (shocks) in punishment learning [130], which
may then inhibit the activity of dopaminergic neurons.

Overall, these results suggest that the inhibition of dopa-
minergic neurons observed following a negative event is
probably indirectly generated by nociceptive/aversive struc-
tures. Why such an indirect anatomical circuit underlies, this
inhibition remains to be fully understood. Note that another
inhibitory input from the dorsal raphe nucleus should be con-
sidered here. Stimulation of this structure, hence increased
release of 5-HT at the level of the nigrostriatal system, has
been shown to slowly inhibit dopaminergic neurons [131].
The role of the direct glutamatergic parabrachial-VTA/SNc
pathways also remains to be fully elucidated, although Zhang
and colleagues [128] have recently linked this pathway to the
development of depressive symptoms in chronic neuropathic
pain in mice in which the parabrachial nucleus is strongly
involved [132]. The pathways linking the parabrachial nu-
cleus to the SNc and VTA are illustrated in Fig. (2B).

4.4. Parabrachial Nucleus Projections to Subthalamic Nucleus

Given the similarities between the projections from the
superior colliculus and parabrachial nucleus to the striatum
and the ventral midbrain, it was likely that this structure
would (like the colliculus) also be anatomically linked to the
subthalamic nucleus. The first evidence of such projection
can be seen in the literature studying the efferent projections
of the parabrachial nucleus to its more classical targets, in-
cluding the thalamus, the hypothalamus and the amygdala
[133], or [134], Fig. (2C). We have confirmed the existence
of this pathway between the parabrachial nucleus and the
subthalamic nucleus [23]. Our injection of an anterograde
tracer into the parabrachial nucleus revealed a robust direct
projection to the ipsilateral subthalamic nucleus and a less
substantial projection to the contralateral side. The para-
brachial terminals were differentially distributed within sub-
regions of the subthalamic nucleus and largely seen in a dor-
sal sheet that extended across the entire mediolateral axis of
the structure, covering the dorsoventral portion at a more
rostral level. The location of the projection in the subthalam-
ic nucleus is similar to the one described previously for the
tecto-subthalamic pathway. The injection of a retrograde
tracer in the subthalamic nucleus labeled numerous cells in
the parabrachial nucleus, supporting the presence of this
pathway. Similar to the parabrachial-nigral pathway, retro-
gradely labeled neurons were found in all subnuclei of both
the contralateral and ipsilateral parabrachial nucleus, includ-
ing within the fibers of the superior cerebellar peduncle.
However, the ipsilateral side had a significantly greater cell
density compared to the contralateral side. The largest densi-
ty of cells projecting to the subthalamic nucleus from the
lateral parabrachial was located in the rostral part of this
structure, while the majority of the medial parabrachial cells
projecting to the subthalamic nucleus were found in the pos-
terior parabrachial nucleus. We have also demonstrated that
the parabrachial nucleus is a crucial relay for nociceptive
signals directed at the subthalamic nucleus and suggested
that this projection was part of a novel nociceptive network
linking the parabrachial nucleus to the basal ganglia [23]. As
discussed previously [23-135], this projection is consistent
with the presumed role of the subthalamic nucleus in the
<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>B. Parabrachial nucleus projection to the dopaminergic neurons</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>C. Parabrachial nucleus projection to the subthalamic nucleus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /></figure>

**Fig. (2).** Schematic illustration of the projections from the parabrachial nucleus to the striatum *via* the thalamus (A) (note that the densest projections are represented), to the dopaminergic neurons (B) and to the subthalamic nucleus (C). (*A higher resolution/colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article*).

interruption of ongoing behavior [136] in the context of the
role of the basal ganglia in action selection [1]. Nociceptive
signals transmitted by the parabrachial nucleus to the subtha-
lamic nucleus clearly indicate that behaviour with negative
consequences is taking place and hence needs to cease.
However, with the involvement of the parabrachial nucleus
in chronic pain, we also suggest that this pathway may have
a wider function, similar to the role of the parabrachial - do-
paminergic pathway previously described [132]. The path-

ways linking the parabrachial nucleus to the subthalamic
nucleus are illustrated in Fig. (2C).

5. THE PERIAQUEDUCTAL GREY NUCLEUS

5.1. Functional Anatomy of the Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus

The periaqueductal grey nucleus is the portion of the ventricular gray matter surrounding the midbrain aqueduct.
There is an agreement that this structure is involved in the coordination of survival and emotional defensive behaviors through its subdivision into four columns along its rostrocaudal axes, the dorsomedial (dmPAG), dorsolateral (dlPAG), lateral (IPAG) and ventrolateral columns (vlPAG) [137, 138]. The periaqueductal grey nucleus plays a major role in integrating responses to internal and external threats that maximize an animal's survival by generating a repertoire of conditioned and unconditioned fear behavior [139, 140]. The dmPAG, dlPAG and IPAG have been shown to be involved in orchestrating active coping strategies such as fight or flight when presented with a threat [137, 141] and the vlPAG in passive coping strategies such as freezing, occurring, for example, to avoid detection [142, 143]. The behavioral sequence generated by each column varies according to the rostrocaudal level in the periaqueductal grey nucleus [139]. Furthermore, a more recent experiment demonstrated that the link between column and behavioral output is more complicated when considering genetically-defined populations of neurons within this structure. Specific activation or inhibition of cholecystokinin-expressing cells in the IPAG and vlPAG can cause a flight to safer regions or reduce predator avoidance without altering other defensive behavior like freezing [144]. The periaqueductal grey nucleus is also implicated in a wide range of physiological functions, probably to optimize these active and passive behavioral sequences, including respiration, cardiovascular changes, vocalization, and pain processing [145-149]. The vlPAG has been shown to be a major site of endogenous opioid-induced pain suppression, and electrical stimulation of the vlPAG produces profound analgesia [143, 150]. It has been suggested that glutamatergic projections from the periaqueductal grey nucleus exert antinociceptive effects, whereas GABAergic projections exert pronociceptive effects on pain transmission through descending pathways [151].

As reviewed by Silva and McNaughton [140], the periaqueductal grey nucleus is strongly interconnected with numerous cortical, subcortical and spinal areas and is positioned at the interface between limbic structures (amygdala, hypothalamus, medial prefrontal cortex) and the lower brainstem (superior colliculus, parabrachial nucleus, raphe nucleus), hence within a circuit essential to survival, whose role and organization has been extensively discussed i.e., [139, 140, 152-154]. The role of the periaqueductal grey nucleus has mainly been studied in relation to the circuit involved in survival and emotional defensive behaviors, especially involving the amygdala. The functional and anatomical links toward the basal ganglia have been sparsely described and discussed. In this review, we introduce the possibility that the periaqueductal grey nucleus shares the same connectivity with the basal ganglia as the superior colliculus and the parabrachial nucleus. Accordingly, this subcortical structure could also contribute to the role of the basal ganglia in action selection and provide different anatomical channels to favor particular kinds of defensive/survival responses, again consistent with a role in the broad functionality of avoidance/ escape.

## 5.2. Subcortical Loop between the Periaqueductal Grey NUCLEUS and the Basal Ganglia

Similar to the parabrachial nucleus, Krout and Loewy [155] provided the first exhaustive analysis of periaqueductal

grey nucleus projections to the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei in the rat, which in turn are known to project to the striatum [156, 157]. This anatomical analysis was performed according to the classical idea that the periaqueductal grey nucleus is divided into 4 columns. This work showed that the number of periaqueductal-thalamic fibers increases across the dorsoventral axis, from small numbers arising from the dorsal part of the periaqueductal grey nucleus to dense projections arising from the ventral part. An antero-grade tracer injected into the dmPAG labeled a small number of axons/terminals, specifically within the paraventricular thalamus. An injection into the dlPAG column gave rise to a similar axonal/terminal distribution as the dmPAG but with more intense labeling. In contrast, injections into the IPAG densely labeled each of the intralaminar thalamic nuclei (except the parafascicular nucleus). Finally, the vlPAG projection to the thalamus was the heaviest of all, terminating densely in the central medial thalamus and moderately in the paraventricular thalamus. Krout and Loewy's [155] corresponding retrograde experiment, in which a retrograde tracer was injected into different parts of the midline and intralaminar thalamus, further highlighted the importance of the rostrocaudal axis of the periaqueductal grey nucleus in terms of the organization of the periaqueductal-thalamic pathways. For example, the intermediate rostrocaudal level of the dlPAG heavily targets the anterior paraventricular thalamus, while the most caudal part of the vlPAG targets the paraventricular more compared to other levels of the periaqueductal grey nucleus. Overall, while a more refined characterization is now needed to reconstruct the specific topography of the periaqueductal-thalamic projections in 3 dimensions, a general channel-like organization stands out with the dorsal periaqueductal grey nucleus having the densest (but not exclusive) projection to the paraventricular nucleus, the IPAG to the intralaminar nuclei and the vlPAG to the central medial thalamus. Again, the output structures of the basal ganglia close the loop with a direct projection between the SNr and the periaqueductal grey nucleus [6, 118], which we have shown to target the entire periaqueductal grey nucleus in our preliminary work in the rat, but with the strongest projection to the vlPAG.

A channel-like functional organization between the dlPAG and the thalamus has recently been studied in the context of fear learning using optogenetic modulation and viral tracing approaches [153]. The authors discovered that the dlPAG but not the vlPAG was important for acquiring aversive memories. They also found that a population of neurons in the dlPAG projecting to the anterior paraventricular nucleus was specifically involved in this acquisition, but dlPAG cells projecting to the posterior paraventricular nucleus or the central medial nucleus were not. Finally, they found that the dlPAG-anterior paraventricular cells do not collateralize to the posterior paraventricular or central medial nucleus of the thalamus. They thus identified a population of cells in the dlPAG that project to the anterior paraventricular nucleus that is involved in fear memory formation. Similar to the parabrachial nucleus, the function of the periaqueductal grey-recipient thalamic projections to the striatum has not been considered or studied to our knowledge. The pathways linking the periaqueductal grey nucleus to the thalamus and striatum are illustrated in Fig. (3A).
<figure><img src="image_10.png" /><figcaption>B. Periaqueductal grey nucleus projection to the dopaminergic neurons</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /><figcaption>C. Periaqueductal grey nucleus projection to the subthalamic nucleus</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

**Fig. (3).** Schematic illustration of the projections from the periaqueductal grey nucleus to the striatum *via* the thalamus (A) (note that the densest projections are represented), to the dopaminergic neurons (B) and to the subthalamic nucleus (C). (*A higher resolution/colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article*).

**5.3. Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus Projections to Dopaminergic Neurons and THE Subthalamic Nucleus**

The projection from the periaqueductal grey nucleus to dopaminergic neurons has mainly been studied in relation to the VTA [158-160] as part of its involvement in nociceptive modulation [161, 162] and the expression of fear and aversive responses [163-165], in which the periaqueductal grey nucleus is also strongly involved. The periaqueductal grey nucleus sends a bilateral projection to the VTA, partly *via* glutamatergic neurons (VGLUT2+) densely localized in the ipsilateral vlPAG [160]. However, the cells involved in the periaqueductal-VTA pathway are not only glutamatergic

[160]. They do not appear to be catecholaminergic (dopaminergic or noradrenergic), at least from the vlPAG [166], which suggests the possible involvement of a GABAergic projection from the periaqueductal grey nucleus to the VTA. Similar to tecto-nigral neurons, periaqueductal grey neurons synapse directly onto dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons in the VTA [165, 167], and both symmetric and asymmetric synapses have been described in these two neuronal populations in this structure [167]. This suggests that the periaqueductal grey nucleus is in a position to excite dopaminergic neurons directly or indirectly *via* GABAergic interneurons as well as inhibit dopaminergic neurons directly [167].
A more recent experiment combining optogenetic modulation and slice recordings reported that the specific activation of vLPAG neurons induced glutamatergic excitatory post-synaptic currents in the majority of neurons (68%) in the VTA and inhibitory post-synaptic currents in a smaller proportion of neurons (50%), with 26% of the cells tested receiving both excitatory and inhibitory connections [168]. Unlike Omelchenko and Sesack [167], Waung and colleagues [168] found that only a minority of optogenetically activated cells in the VTA were TH+ (3/11 cells labeled with biocytin). The authors have also found that vLPAG - VTA neurons are activated in a mouse migraine model and inhibiting this pathway relieves the aversive state elicited during headache in mice [168]. Further work is now needed to fully evaluate the nature and influence of the periaqueductal grey nucleus over the VTA, considering that Ntamati and colleagues [165] also reported an excitatory projection to both dopaminergic and GABAergic cells in the VTA [165]. Similar studies are also required on the link between the periaqueductal grey nucleus and the SNc to test whether the periaqueductal GABAergic inputs can directly induce inhibitory responses in dopaminergic neurons following nociceptive stimuli or after a negative outcome described previously.

The literature on the link between the periaqueductal grey nucleus and the subthalamic nucleus can, to our knowledge, only be found in a single tract-tracing experiment providing evidence of a direct bilateral projection between these two structures [24]. The topography and role of this pathway should also be further explored according to the periaqueductal grey nucleus subdivisions. Similar to the parabrachial nucleus, the periaqueductal grey nucleus may also provide survival and defense signals to the subthalamic nucleus as part of the interrupt circuitry in case of an emergency, aspects of the avoidance/escape repertoire, which we suggest are not transmitted by the superior colliculus. The pathways linking the periaqueductal grey nucleus to the SNc/VTA and subthalamic nucleus are illustrated in Figs. (3B and C).

## 5.4. Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus Link with the Basal Ganglia - Summary

In summary, the link between the periaqueductal grey nucleus and the basal ganglia is also in crucial need of further investigation. There is strong evidence of functionally segregated channel-like loops, possibly sending bids to the basal ganglia to get access to common motor resources when survival is involved. The periaqueductal grey nucleus is also in a position to directly inhibit dopaminergic neurons *via* GABAergic modulation, at least for the VTA, possibly providing a solution to the need for the fast transmission of signals relating to negative/nociceptive events.

## CONCLUSION

So, evidence suggests that systems subserving approach and avoidance/escape are kept largely separate as they enter the striatum *via* the thalamus, at least in rats and mice, consistent with the non-overlapping behavioural demands of the eliciting contexts. Presumably, ecological pressures have resulted in the partitioning of these two sets of signals at the level of the superior colliculus, where each is involved in the formation of a partially closed loop. Further work is required

to explore in more detail whether similar separated processing streams are present in higher species. In parallel with the separated signals feeding forward from the colliculus, the structure also appears to give rise to outputs that innervate other aspects of the basal ganglia, namely the SNc and subthalamic nucleus. These afferents arise, at least in the rat, from an area of the colliculus that appears to be involved in approach behavior. In terms of the afferents to dopaminergic neurons in the SNc, this accords with their role in reinforcement learning. It is also tempting to ascribe an approach function to the projections of the subthalamic nucleus. However, future studies are needed that manipulate this pathway optogenetically to convincingly assay its behavioural role. Unlike the segregated inputs to the striatum from the colliculus *via* the thalamus, the SNc and subthalamic nucleus seem to be pointed at which approach and avoidance/escape signals converge. Hence, dopaminergic neurons in the SNc receive nociceptive signals from the parabrachial nucleus and defense-related inputs from the periaqueductal grey nucleus, as does the subthalamic nucleus, and both dopaminergic neurons and the subthalamic nucleus receive appetitive signals from the colliculus. As with the convergence of the dorsal and ventral streams of cortical visual processing [169], it may make functional sense to unite the approach and avoidance/escape signals. Both are potential reasons to interrupt ongoing behaviour (*via* the subthalamic nucleus), and both are needed to feed a system that conveys information about events being better or worse than expected (the dopaminergic neurons in the SNc). Nonetheless, much work is still needed to answer some of the crucial outstanding questions. Why are dopaminergic neurons inhibited indirectly (*via* the RMTg) by negative stimuli? Related to that, what is the role of the direct glutamatergic parabrachial-VTA/SNc pathway that runs parallel to connections relaying in the RMTg/tail of the VTA? Indeed, the functional link between the basal ganglia and the parabrachial nucleus, or the periaqueductal grey nucleus and the basal ganglia, in the context of the response to potential threats, to our knowledge, has never been considered and studied. Whilst we clearly have some of the answers to how approach and avoidance/escape signals are processed by the basal ganglia, there is still much to learn.

## LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

BDA = Biotinylated Dextran Amine

CGRP = Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide

dlPAG = Dorsolateral Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus

dmPAG = Dorsomedial Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus

IPAG = Lateral Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus

PHA-L = Phaseolus Vulgaris Leucoagglutinin

RMTg = Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus

SNc = Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta

SNr = Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulate

TH = Tyrosine Hydroxylase

vLPAG = Ventrolateral Periaqueductal Grey Nucleus

VTA = Ventral Tegmental Area
## CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

## FUNDING

None.

## CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

## REFERENCES

[1] Redgrave, P.; Prescott, T.J.; Gurney, K. The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem? *Neuroscience*, **1999**, *89*(4), 1009-1023.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00319-4 PMID: 10362291

[2] Medina, L.; Reiner, A. Neurotransmitter organization and connectivity of the basal ganglia in vertebrates: implications for the evolution of basal ganglia. *Brain Behav. Evol.*, **1995**, *46*(4-5), 235-246.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000113277 PMID: 8564466

[3] Butler, A.B. The evolution of the dorsal thalamus of jawed vertebrates, including mammals: Cladistic analysis and a new hypothesis. *Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.*, **1994**, *19*(1), 29-65.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(94)90003-5 PMID: 8167659

[4] Wicht, H.; Northcutt, R.G. An immunohistochemical study of the telencephalon and the diencephalon in a Myxinoid jawless fish, the Pacific hagfish, Eptatretus stouti. *Brain Behav. Evol.*, **1994**, *43*(3), 140-161.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000113631 PMID: 7514941

[5] McHaffie, J.; Stanford, T.; Stein, B.; Coizet, V.; Redgrave, P. Subcortical loops through the basal ganglia. *Trends Neurosci.*, **2005**, *28*(8), 401-407.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2005.06.006 PMID: 15982753

[6] Hopkins, D.A.; Niessen, L.W. Substantia nigra projections to the reticular formation, superior colliculus and central gray in the rat, cat and monkey. *Neurosci. Lett.*, **1976**, *2*(5), 253-259.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(76)90156-7 PMID: 19604767

[7] Parent, A.; Hazrati, L.N. Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. *Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.*, **1995**, *20*(1), 91-127.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-C PMID: 7711769

[8] Alexander, G.E.; DeLong, M.R.; Strick, P.L. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.*, **1986**, *9*(1), 357-381.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 PMID: 3085570

[9] Gerfen, C.R.; Wilson, C.J. The basal ganglia. In: *Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy – Intergrated systems of the CNS*; Swanson, L.W.; Bjorklund, A.; Hokfelt, T., Eds.; Elsvier: Amsterdam, **1996**; Vol. 12, pp. 371-468.

[10] Mink, J.W. The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. *Prog. Neurobiol.*, **1996**, *50*(4), 381-425.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00042-1 PMID: 9004351

[11] Wickens, J. Basal ganglia: structure and computations. *Network*, **1997**, *8*(4), R77-R109.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X_8_4_001

[12] Deniau, J.M.; Chevalier, G. The lamellar organization of the rat substantia nigra pars reticulata: Distribution of projection neurons. *Neuroscience*, **1992**, *46*(2), 361-377.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(92)90058-A PMID: 1542412

[13] Schneider, J.S. Interactions between the basal ganglia, the pontine parabachial region, and the trigeminal system in cat. *Neuroscience*, **1986**, *19*(2), 411-425.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(86)90271-X PMID: 3774149

[14] Spann, B.M.; Grofova, I. Nigropedunculopontine projection in the rat: An Anterograde tracing study with phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1991**, *311*(3), 375-388.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903110308 PMID: 1720145

[15] Albin, R.L.; Young, A.B.; Penney, J.B. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. *Trends Neurosci.*, **1989**, *12*(10), 366-375.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-X PMID: 2479133

[16] Nambu, A.; Tokuno, H.; Hamada, I.; Kita, H.; Imanishi, M.; Akazawa, T.; Ikeuchi, Y.; Hasegawa, N. Excitatory cortical inputs to pallidal neurons via the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **2000**, *84*(1), 289-300.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.289 PMID: 10899204

[17] Schultz, W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1998**, *80*(1), 1-27.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 PMID: 9658025

[18] Schultz, W.; Dayan, P.; Montague, P.R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. *Science*, **1997**, *275*(5306), 1593-1599.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 PMID: 9054347

[19] Redgrave, P.; Gurney, K. The short-latency dopamine signal: A role in discovering novel actions? *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.*, **2006**, *7*(12), 967-975.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2022 PMID: 17115078

[20] Isoda, M.; Hikosaka, O. Role for subthalamic nucleus neurons in switching from automatic to controlled eye movement. *J. Neurosci.*, **2008**, *28*(28), 7209-7218.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0487-08.2008 PMID: 18614691

[21] Tokuno, H.; Takada, M.; Ikai, Y.; Mizuno, N. Direct projections from the deep layers of the superior colliculus to the subthalamic nucleus in the rat. *Brain Res.*, **1994**, *639*(1), 156-160.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91776-0 PMID: 8180831

[22] Coizet, V.; Graham, J.H.; Moss, J.; Bolam, J.P.; Savasta, M.; McHaffie, J.G.; Redgrave, P.; Overton, P.G. Short-latency visual input to the subthalamic nucleus is provided by the midbrain superior colliculus. *J. Neurosci.*, **2009**, *29*(17), 5701-5709.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0247-09.2009 PMID: 19403836

[23] Pautrat, A.; Rolland, M.; Barthelemy, M.; Baunez, C.; Sinniger, V.; Piallat, B.; Savasta, M.; Overton, P.G.; David, O.; Coizet, V. Revealing a novel nociceptive network that links the subthalamic nucleus to pain processing. *eLife*, **2018**, *7*(7), e36607.

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36607 PMID: 30149836

[24] Çavdar, S.; Özgür, M.; Çakmak, Y.Ö.; Kuvvet, Y.; Kunt, S.K.; Sağlam, G. Afferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus in the rat: Emphasis on bilateral and interhemispheric connections. *Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsz.)*, **2018**, *78*(3), 251-263.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/ane-2018-023 PMID: 30295682

[25] Smith, Y.; Bevan, M.D.; Shink, E.; Bolam, J.P. Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. *Neuroscience*, **1998**, *86*(2), 353-387.

PMID: 9881853

[26] Cheruel, F.; Dormont, J.F.; Farin, D. Activity of neurons of the subthalamic nucleus in relation to motor performance in the cat. *Exp. Brain Res.*, **1996**, *108*(2), 206-220.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00228095 PMID: 8815030

[27] Ryan, L.J.; Clark, K.B. The role of the subthalamic nucleus in the response of globus pallidus neurons to stimulation of the prelimbic and agranular frontal cortices in rats. *Exp. Brain Res.*, **1991**, *86*(3), 641-651.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00230538 PMID: 1761097

[28] May, P.J. The mammalian superior colliculus: Laminar structure and connections. *Prog. Brain Res.*, **2006**, *151*, 321-378.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51011-2 PMID: 16221594

[29] Wilson, M.E.; Toyne, M.J. Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections inMacaca mulatta. *Brain Res.*, **1970**, *24*(3), 395-406.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(70)90181-2 PMID: 4099749

[30] Kelly, J.P.; Gilbert, C.D. The projections of different morphological types of ganglion cells in the cat retina. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1975**, *163*(1), 65-80.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.901630105 PMID: 1159111
[31] Garey, L.J.; Jones, E.G.; Powell, T.P. Interrelationships of striate and extrastriate cortex with the primary relay sites of the visual pathway. *J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry*, **1968**, *31*(2), 135-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.31.2.135 PMID: 5684020

[32] Stein, B.E.; Arigbede, M.O. Unimodal and multimodal response properties of neurons in the cat's superior colliculus. *Exp. Neurol.*, **1972**, *36*(1), 179-196.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(72)90145-8 PMID: 4558413

[33] Siminoff, R.; Schwassmann, H.O.; Kruger, L. An electrophysiolog- ical study of the visual projection to the superior colliculus of the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1966**, *127*(4), 435-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.901270402 PMID: 5968989

[34] Feldon, S.; Feldon, P.; Kruger, L. Topography of the retinal projec- tion upon the superior colliculus of the cat. *Vision Res.*, **1970**, *10*(2), 135-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(70)90111-2 PMID: 5440778

[35] Rosa, M.G.P.; Schmid, L.M. Topography and extent of visual-field representation in the superior colliculus of the megachiropteran *Pteropus. Vis. Neurosci.*, **1994**, *11*(6), 1037-1057.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952523800006878 PMID: 7841115

[36] Wurtz, R.H.; Albano, J.E. Visual-motor function of the primate superior colliculus. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.*, **1980**, *3*(1), 189-226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.001201 PMID: 6774653

[37] Hikosaka, O.; Wurtz, R.H. Modification of saccadic eye move- ments by GABA-related substances. I. Effect of muscimol and bicuculline in monkey superior colliculus. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1985**, *53*(1), 266-291.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.266 PMID: 2983037

[38] Cowie, R.J.; Robinson, D.L. Subcortical contributions to head movements in macaques. I. Contrasting effects of electrical stimu- lation of a medial pontomedullary region and the superior collicu- lus. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1994**, *72*(6), 2648-2664.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.72.6.2648 PMID: 7897481

[39] Anderson, E.J.; Rees, G. Neural correlates of spatial orienting in the human superior colliculus. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **2011**, *106*(5), 2273-2284.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00286.2011 PMID: 21753026

[40] Gandhi, N.J.; Katnani, H.A. Motor functions of the superior collic- ulus. *Annu. Rev. Neurosci.*, **2011**, *34*(1), 205-231.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113728 PMID: 21456962

[41] DesJardin, J.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Forcelli, P.A.; Cole, C.E.; Gale, J.T.; Wellman, L.L.; Gale, K.; Malkova, L. Defense-like behaviors evoked by pharmacological disinhibition of the superior colliculus in the primate. *J. Neurosci.*, **2013**, *33*(1), 150-155.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-12.2013 PMID: 23283329

[42] Wu, L.Q.; Niu, Y.Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, S.R. Tectal neurons signal impending collision of looming objects in the pigeon. *Eur. J. Neurosci.*, **2005**, *22*(9), 2325-2331.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04397.x PMID: 16262670

[43] Kang, H.J.; Li, X.H. Response properties and receptive field organ- ization of collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of bull- frog, *Rana catesbeiana*. *Neurosci. Bull.*, **2010**, *26*(4), 304-316.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12264-010-0306-8 PMID: 20651812

[44] Zhao, X.; Liu, M.; Cang, J. Visual cortex modulates the magnitude but not the selectivity of looming-evoked responses in the superior colliculus of awake mice. *Neuron*, **2014**, *84*(1), 202-213.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.037 PMID: 25220812

[45] Liu, Y.J.; Wang, Q.; Li, B. Neuronal responses to looming objects in the superior colliculus of the cat. *Brain Behav. Evol.*, **2011**, *77*(3), 193-205.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327045 PMID: 21546772

[46] Billington, J.; Wilkie, R.M.; Field, D.T.; Wann, J.P. Neural pro- cessing of imminent collision in humans. *Proc. Biol. Sci.*, **2011**, *278*(1711), 1476-1481.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1895 PMID: 20980303

[47] Comoli, E.; Das Neves Favaro, P.; Vautrelle, N.; Leriche, M.; Overton, P.G.; Redgrave, P. Segregated anatomical input to sub- regions of the rodent superior colliculus associated with approach and defense. *Front. Neuroanat.*, **2012**, *6*, 9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2012.00009 PMID: 22514521

[48] Redgrave, P.; Odekunle, A.; Dean, P. Tectal cells of origin of pre- dorsal bundle in rat: Location and segregation from ipsilateral de- scending pathway. *Exp. Brain Res.*, **1986**, *63*(2), 279-293.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00236845 PMID: 3093259

[49] Redgrave, P.; Mitchell, I.J.; Dean, P. Descending projections from the superior colliculus in rat: A study using orthograde transport of wheatgerm-agglutinin conjugated horseradish peroxidase. *Exp. Brain Res.*, **1987**, *68*(1), 147-167.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00255241 PMID: 2826204

[50] Redgrave, P.; Dean, P.; Mitchell, I.J.; Odekunle, A.; Clark, A. The projection from superior colliculus to cuneiform area in the rat. *Exp. Brain Res.*, **1988**, *72*(3), 611-625.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00250606 PMID: 2466683

[51] Chevalier, G.; Deniau, J.M. Spatio-temporal organization of a branched tecto-spinal/ tecto-diencephalic neuronal system. *Neuro- science*, **1984**, *12*(2), 427-439.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(84)90063-0 PMID: 6462457

[52] Krout, K.E.; Loewy, A.D.; Westby, G.W.; Redgrave, P. Superior colliculus projections to midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei of the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2001**, *431*(2), 198-216.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20010305)431:2<198::AID-CNE1065>3.0.CO;2-8 PMID: 11170000

[53] Yamasaki, D.S.G.; Krauthamer, G.M. Somatosensory neurons projecting from the superior colliculus to the intralaminar thalamus in the rat. *Brain Res.*, **1990**, *523*(2), 188-194.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)91486-Z PMID: 2400905

[54] Hayes, L.M. Subcortical loops through the basal ganglia are or- gainised into segregated channels., Doctoral dissertation, Universi- ty of Sheffield, **2012**.

[55] Pan, W.X.; Mao, T.; Dudman, J.T. Inputs to the dorsal striatum of the mouse reflect the parallel circuit architecture of the forebrain. *Front. Neuroanat.*, **2010**, *4*, 147.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2010.00147 PMID: 21212837

[56] Schwab, M.; Agid, Y.; Glowinski, J.; Thoenen, H. Retrograde axonal transport of 125I-tetanus toxin as a too for tracing fiber con- nections in the central nervous system; connections of the rostral part of the rat neostriatum. *Brain Res.*, **1977**, *126*(2), 211-224.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(77)90722-3 PMID: 67875

[57] LeDoux, J.E.; Farb, C.; Ruggiero, D.A. Topographic organization of neurons in the acoustic thalamus that project to the amygdala. *J. Neurosci.*, **1990**, *10*(4), 1043-1054.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-04-01043.1990 PMID: 2158523

[58] LeDoux, J.E.; Farb, C.R.; Romanski, L.M. Overlapping projections to the amygdala and striatum from auditory processing areas of the thalamus and cortex. *Neurosci. Lett.*, **1991**, *134*(1), 139-144.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(91)90526-Y PMID: 1815147

[59] Gangarossa, G.; Castell, L.; Castro, L.; Tarot, P.; Veyrunes, F.; Vincent, P.; Bertaso, F.; Valjent, E. Contrasting patterns of ERK activation in the tail of the striatum in response to aversive and re- warding signals. *J. Neurochem.*, **2019**, *151*(2), 204-226.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14804 PMID: 31245856

[60] Miyamoto, Y.; Katayama, S.; Shigematsu, N.; Nishi, A.; Fukuda, T. Striosome-based map of the mouse striatum that is conformable to both cortical afferent topography and uneven distributions of do- pamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing cells. *Brain Struct. Funct.*, **2018**, *223*(9), 4275-4291.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1749-3 PMID: 30203304

[61] Miyamoto, Y.; Nagayoshi, I.; Nishi, A.; Fukuda, T. Three divisions of the mouse caudal striatum differ in the proportions of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing cells, distribution of dopaminergic axons, and composition of cholinergic and GABAergic interneu- rons. *Brain Struct. Funct.*, **2019**, *224*(8), 2703-2716.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01928-3 PMID: 31375982

[62] Kim, H.F.; Hikosaka, O. Distinct basal ganglia circuits controlling behaviors guided by flexible and stable values. *Neuron*, **2013**, *79*(5), 1001-1010.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.044 PMID: 23954031

[63] Kim, H.F.; Ghazizadeh, A.; Hikosaka, O. Separate groups of do- pamine neurons innervate caudate head and tail encoding flexible and stable value memories. *Front. Neuroanat.*, **2014**, *8*, 120.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2014.00120 PMID: 25400553

[64] Menegas, W.; Akiti, K.; Amo, R.; Uchida, N.; Watabe-Uchida, M. Dopamine neurons projecting to the posterior striatum reinforce
avoidance of threatening stimuli. *Nat. Neurosci.*, **2018**, *21*(10),
1421-1430.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0222-1 PMID: 30177795

[65] Li, Z.; Wei, J.X.; Zhang, G.W.; Huang, J.I.; Zingg, B.; Wang, X.; Tao, H.W.; Zhang, L.I. Corticostriatal control of defense behavior in mice induced by auditory looming cues. *Nat. Commun.*, **2021**, *12*(1), 1040.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21248-7 PMID: 33589613

[66] Tulloch, I.F.; Arbuthnott, G.W.; Wright, A.K. Topographical or- ganization of the striatonigral pathway revealed by anterograde and retrograde neuroanatomical tracing techniques. *J. Anat.*, **1978**, *127*(Pt 2), 425-441.

PMID: 721701

[67] Redgrave, P.; Marrow, L.; Dean, P. Topographical organization of the nigrotectal projection in rat: Evidence for segregated channels. Neuroscience, **1992**, *50*(3), 571-595.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(92)90448-B PMID: 1279464

[68] Coizet, V.; Comoli, E.; Westby, G.W.M.; Redgrave, P. Phasic activation of substantia nigra and the ventral tegmental area by chemical stimulation of the superior colliculus: An electrophysio- logical investigation in the rat. Eur. J. Neurosci., **2003**, *17*(1), 28- 40.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02415.x PMID:
12534966

[69] Comoli, E.; Coizet, V.; Boyes, J.; Bolam, J.P.; Canteras, N.S.; Quirk, R.H.; Overton, P.G.; Redgrave, P. A direct projection from superior colliculus to substantia nigra for detecting salient visual events. *Nat. Neurosci.*, **2003**, *6*(9), 974-980.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1113 PMID: 12925855

[70] Dommett, E.; Coizet, V.; Blaha, C.D.; Martindale, J.; Lefebvre, V.; Walton, N.; Mayhew, J.E.W.; Overton, P.G.; Redgrave, P. How visual stimuli activate dopaminergic neurons at short latency. *Science*, **2005**, *307*(5714), 1476-1479.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1107026 PMID: 15746431

[71] Huang, M.; Li, D.; Cheng, X.; Pei, Q.; Xie, Z.; Gu, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, A.; Wang, Y.; Sun, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, M.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, F.; Qi, X.; Shang, C.; Cao, P. The tectonigral pathway regulates appetitive locomotion in predatory hunting in mice. *Nat. Commun.*, **2021**, *12*(1), 4409.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24696-3

[72] Solié, C.; Contestabile, A.; Espinosa, P.; Musardo, S.; Bariselli, S.; Huber, C.; Carleton, A.; Bellone, C. Superior colliculus to VTA pathway controls orienting response and influences social interac- tion in mice. *Nat. Commun.*, **2022**, *13*(1), 817.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28512-4 PMID: 35145124

[73] McHaffie, J.G.; Jiang, H.; May, P.J.; Coizet, V.; Overton, P.G.; Stein, B.E.; Redgrave, P. A direct projection from superior collicu- lus to substantia nigra pars compacta in the cat. Neuroscience, **2006**, *138*(1), 221-234.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.015 PMID:
16361067

[74] May, P.J.; McHaffie, J.G.; Stanford, T.R.; Jiang, H.; Costello, M.G.; Coizet, V.; Hayes, L.M.; Haber, S.N.; Redgrave, P. Tecto- nigral projections in the primate: A pathway for pre-attentive sen- sory input to midbrain dopaminergic neurons. *Eur. J. Neurosci.*, **2009**, *29*(3), 575-587.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06596.x PMID:
19175405

[75] Vautrelle, N.; Coizet, V.; Leriche, M.; Dahan, L.; Schulz, J.M.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zeghbib, A.; Overton, P.G.; Bracci, E.; Redgrave, P.; Reynolds, J.N.J. Sensory reinforced corticostriatal plasticity. *Curr. Neuropharmacol.*, **2024**, *22*(9), 1513-1527.

[76] Schultz, W. Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of re- ward. *Annu. Rev. Psychol.*, **2006**, *57*(1), 87-115.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070229 PMID:
16318590

[77] Lee, J.; Wang, W.; Sabatini, B.L. Anatomically segregated basal ganglia pathways allow parallel behavioral modulation. *Nat. Neurosci.*, **2020**, *23*(11), 1388-1398.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00712-5 PMID: 32989293

[78] Westlund, K.N.; Bowker, R.M.; Ziegler, M.G.; Coulter, J.D. Nora- drenergic projections to the spinal cord of the rat. *Brain Res.*, **1983**, *263*(1), 15-31.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(83)91196-4 PMID: 6839168

[79] Ren, K.; Dubner, R. Descending control mechanisms. *The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference*, **2008**, 723-762.

[80] Norgren, R.; Leonard, C.M. Ascending central gustatory pathways. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1973**, *150*(2), 217-237.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.901500208 PMID: 4723066

[81] Weiss, M.S.; Victor, J.D.; Di Lorenzo, P.M. Taste coding in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons in awake, freely licking rats and comparison with the nucleus of the solitary tract. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **2014**, *111*(8), 1655-1670.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00643.2013 PMID: 24381029

[82] Arima, Y.; Yokota, S.; Fujitani, M. Lateral parabrachial neurons innervate orexin neurons projecting to brainstem arousal areas in the rat. *Sci. Rep.*, **2019**, *9*(1), 2830.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39063-y PMID: 30808976

[83] Carter, M.E.; Soden, M.E.; Zweifel, L.S.; Palmiter, R.D. Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite. *Nature*, **2013**, *503*(7474), 111-114.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12596 PMID: 24121436

[84] Campos, C.A.; Bowen, A.J.; Schwartz, M.W.; Palmiter, R.D. Parabrachial CGRP neurons control meal termination. *Cell Metab.*, **2016**, *23*(5), 811-820.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.006 PMID: 27166945

[85] Chamberlin, N.L.; Saper, C.B. Topographic organization of res-piratory responses to glutamate microstimulation of the parabrachi-al nucleus in the rat. *J. Neuro.*, **1992**, *14*(111), 6500-6510.

[86] Fuller, P.; Sherman, D.; Pedersen, N.P.; Saper, C.B.; Lu, J. Reas- sessment of the structural basis of the ascending arousal system. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2011**, *519*(5), 933-956.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.22559 PMID: 21280045

[87] Kaur, S.; Pedersen, N.P.; Yokota, S.; Hur, E.E.; Fuller, P.M.; Laza- rus, M.; Chamberlin, N.L.; Saper, C.B. Glutamatergic signaling from the parabrachial nucleus plays a critical role in hypercapnic arousal. *J. Neurosci.*, **2013**, *33*(18), 7627-7640.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0173-13.2013 PMID:
23637157

[88] Saper, C.B. The house alarm. *Cell Metab.*, **2016**, *23*(5), 754-755.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.021 PMID: 27166934

[89] Palmiter, R.D. The Parabrachial nucleus: CGRP neurons function as a general alarm. *Trends Neurosci.*, **2018**, *41*(5), 280-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.007 PMID: 29703377

[90] Allen, G.V.; Pronych, S.P. Trigeminal autonomic pathways in- volved in nociception-induced reflex cardiovascular responses. *Brain Res.*, **1997**, *754*(1-2), 269-278.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00091-7 PMID: 9134984

[91] Allen, G.V.; Barbrick, B.; Esser, M.J. Trigeminal-parabrachial connections: possible pathway for nociception-induced cardiovas- cular reflex responses. *Brain Res.*, **1996**, *715*(1-2), 125-135.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)01580-9 PMID: 8739631

[92] Bernard, J.F.; Peschanski, M.; Besson, J.M. A possible spino (tri- gemino)-ponto-amygdaloid pathway for pain. *Neurosci. Lett.*, **1989**, *100*(1-3), 83-88.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(89)90664-2 PMID: 2474780

[93] Bernard, J.F.; Huang, G.F.; Besson, J.M. The parabrachial area: Electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in visceral noci- ceptive processes. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1994**, *71*(5), 1646-1660.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.71.5.1646 PMID: 8064340

[94] Bester, H.; Menendez, L.; Besson, J.M.; Bernard, J.F. Spino (tri- gemino) parabrhiohypothalamic pathway: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1995**, *73*(2), 568-585.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.568 PMID: 7760119

[95] Klop, E.M.; Mouton, L.J.; Hulsebosch, R.; Boers, J.; Holstege, G. In cat four times as many lamina I neurons project to the para- brachial nuclei and twice as many to the periaqueductal gray as to the thalamus. Neuroscience, **2005**, *134*(1), 189-197.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.035 PMID:
15953685

[96] Spike, R.C.; Puskár, Z.; Andrew, D.; Todd, A.J. A quantitative and morphological study of projection neurons in lamina I of the rat lumbar spinal cord. *Eur. J. Neurosci.*, **2003**, *18*(9), 2433-2448.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02981.x PMID:
14622144
[97] Bernard, J.F.; Besson, J.M. The spino(trigemino)pontoamygdaloid pathway: Electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1990**, *63*(3), 473-490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1990.63.3.473 PMID: 2329357

[98] Hunt, S.P.; Mantyh, P.W. The molecular dynamics of pain control. *Nat. Rev. Neurosci.*, **2001**, *2*(2), 83-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35053509 PMID: 11252998

[99] Yasui, Y.; Saper, C.B.; Cechetto, D.F. Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the visceral sensory cortex, thalamus, and related pathways in the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1989**, *290*(4), 487-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.902900404 PMID: 2613940

[100] Deng, J.; Zhou, H.; Lin, J.K.; Shen, Z.X.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, L.H.; Li, Q.; Mu, D.; Wei, Y.C.; Xu, X.H.; Sun, Y.G. The parabrachial nucleus directly channels spinal nociceptive signals to the intralaminar thalamic nuclei, but not the amygdala. *Neuron*, **2020**, *107*(5), 909-923.e6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.017 PMID: 32649865

[101] Han, S.; Soleiman, M.T.; Soden, M.E.; Zweifel, L.S.; Palmiter, R.D. Elucidating an affective pain circuit that creates a threat memory. *Cell*, **2015**, *162*(2), 363-374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.057 PMID: 26186190

[102] Barik, A.; Thompson, J.H.; Seltzer, M.; Ghitani, N.; Chesler, A.T. A brainstem-spinal circuit controlling nocifensive behavior. *Neuron*, **2018**, *100*(6), 1491-1503.e3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.037 PMID: 30449655

[103] Chen, J.Y.; Campos, C.A.; Jarvie, B.C.; Palmiter, R.D. Parabrachial CGRP neurons establish and sustain aversive taste memories. *Neuron*, **2018**, *100*(4), 891-899.e5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.032 PMID: 30344042

[104] Gauriau, C.; Bernard, J.F. Pain pathways and parabrachial circuits in the rat. *Exp. Physiol.*, **2002**, *87*(2), 251-258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/eph8702357 PMID: 11856971

[105] Roeder, Z.; Chen, Q.; Davis, S.; Carlson, J.D.; Tupone, D.; Heinricher, M.M. Parabrachial complex links pain transmission to descending pain modulation. *Pain*, **2016**, *157*(12), 2697-2708.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000688 PMID: 27657698

[106] Campos, C.A.; Bowen, A.J.; Roman, C.W.; Palmiter, R.D. Encoding of danger by parabrachial CGRP neurons. *Nature*, **2018**, *555*(7698), 617-622.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25511 PMID: 29562230

[107] Chiang, M.C.; Bowen, A.; Schier, L.A.; Tupone, D.; Uddin, O.; Heinricher, M.M. Parabrachial complex: A hub for pain and aversion. *J. Neurosci.*, **2019**, *39*(42), 8225-8230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1162-19.2019 PMID: 31619491

[108] Hermanson, O.; Blomqvist, A. Preproenkephalin messenger RNA-expressing neurons in the rat parabrachial nucleus: subnuclear organization and projections to the intralaminar thalamus. *Neuroscience*, **1997**, *81*(3), 803-812.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00241-8 PMID: 9316029

[109] Krout, K.E.; Jansen, A.S.P.; Loewy, A.D. Periaqueductal gray matter projection to the parabrachial nucleus in rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1998**, *401*(4), 437-454.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19981130)401:4<437::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-5 PMID: 9826272

[110] Krout, K.E.; Loewy, A.D. Parabrachial nucleus projections to midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei of the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2000**, *428*(3), 475-494.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20001218)428:3<475::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-9 PMID: 11074446

[111] Saper, C.B. The spinoparabrachial pathway: Shedding new light on an old path. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1995**, *353*(4), 477-479.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903530402 PMID: 7759611

[112] Fulwiler, C.E.; Saper, C.B. Subnuclear organization of the efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. *Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.*, **1984**, *7*(3), 229-259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(84)90012-2 PMID: 6478256

[113] Esser, M.J.; Pronych, S.P.; Allen, G.V. Trigeminal-reticular connections: Possible pathways for nociception-induced cardiovascular reflex responses in the rat. *J Comp Neurol*, **1998**, *391*(4), 526-44.
PMID: 9486829

[114] Benarroch, E.E. Parabrachial nuclear complex. *Neurology*, **2016**, *86*(7), 676-683.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002393 PMID: 26791152

[115] Bourgeais, L.; Monconduit, L.; Villanueva, L.; Bernard, J.F. Parabrachial internal lateral neurons convey nociceptive messages from the deep laminas of the dorsal horn to the intralaminar thalamus. *J. Neurosci.*, **2001**, *21*(6), 2159-2165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-02159.2001 PMID: 11245700

[116] Bernard, J.F.; Dallel, R.; Raboisson, P.; Villanueva, L.; Bars, D.L. Organization of the efferent projections from the spinal cervical enlargement to the parabrachial area and periaqueductal graye. A PHA-L study in the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1995**, *353*(4), 480-505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903530403 PMID: 7759612

[117] Pauli, J.L.; Chen, J.Y.; Basiri, M.L.; Park, S.; Carter, M.E.; Sanz, E.; McKnight, G.S.; Stuber, G.D.; Palmiter, R.D. Molecular and anatomical characterization of parabrachial neurons and their axonal projections. *eLife*, **2022**, *11*, e81868
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81868 PMID: 36317965

[118] McElvain, L.E.; Chen, Y.; Moore, J.D.; Brigidi, G.S.; Bloodgood, B.L.; Lim, B.K.; Costa, R.M.; Kleinfeld, D. Specific populations of basal ganglia output neurons target distinct brain stem areas while collateralizing throughout the diencephalon. *Neuron*, **2021**, *109*(10), 1721-1738.e4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.017 PMID: 33823137

[119] Freeman, A.S.; Bunney, B.S. Activity of A<sub>9</sub> and A<sub>10</sub> dopaminergic neurons in unrestrained rats: further characterization and effects of apomorphine and cholecystokinin. *Brain Res.*, **1987**, *405*(1), 46-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90988-7 PMID: 3032350

[120] Horvitz, J.C.; Stewart, T.; Jacobs, B.L. Burst activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons is elicited by sensory stimuli in the awake cat. *Brain Res.*, **1997**, *759*(2), 251-258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00265-5 PMID: 9221945

[121] Schultz, W. Reward signaling by dopamine neurons. *Neuroscien-tist*, **2001**, *7*(4), 293-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107385840100700406 PMID: 11488395

[122] Schultz, W.; Romo, R. Responses of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons to high-intensity somatosensory stimulation in the anesthetized monkey. *J. Neurophysiol.*, **1987**, *57*(1), 201-217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.57.1.201 PMID: 3559672

[123] Coizet, V.; Dommett, E.J.; Redgrave, P.; Overton, P.G. Nociceptive responses of midbrain dopaminergic neurones are modulated by the superior colliculus in the rat. *Neuroscience*, **2006**, *139*(4), 1479-1493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.01.030 PMID: 16516396

[124] Ungless, M.A.; Magill, P.J.; Bolam, J.P. Uniform inhibition of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area by aversive stimuli. *Science*, **2004**, *303*(5666), 2040-2042.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093360 PMID: 15044807

[125] Coizet, V.; Dommett, E.J.; Klop, E.M.; Redgrave, P.; Overton, P.G. The parabrachial nucleus is a critical link in the transmission of short latency nociceptive information to midbrain dopaminergic neurons. *Neuroscience*, **2010**, *168*(1), 263-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.049 PMID: 20363297

[126] Huang, D.; Grady, F.S.; Peltekian, L.; Laing, J.J.; Geerling, J.C. Efferent projections of CGRP/ Calca-expressing parabrachial neurons in mice. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2021**, *529*(11), 2911-2957.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.25136 PMID: 33715169

[127] Yang, H.; de Jong, J.W.; Cerniauskas, I.; Peck, J.R.; Lim, B.K.; Gong, H.; Fields, H.L.; Lammel, S. Pain modulates dopamine neurons via a spinal–parabrachial–mesencephalic circuit. *Nat. Neuro-sci.*, **2021**, *24*(10), 1402-1413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00903-8 PMID: 34373644

[128] Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Niu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Huang, D.; Ma, J.; Sun, H.; Gamper, N.; Du, X.; Zhang, H. Activation of parabrachial nucleus - ventral tegmental area pathway underlies the comorbid depression in chronic neuropathic pain in mice. *Cell Rep.*, **2021**, *37*(5), 109936.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109936 PMID: 34731609
[129] Kaufling, J.; Veinante, P.; Pawlowski, S.A.; Freund-Mercier, M.J.; Barrot, M. Afferents to the GABAergic tail of the ventral tegmental area in the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2009**, *513*(6), 597-621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.21983 PMID: 19235223

[130] Li, H.; Vento, P.J.; Parrilla-Carrero, J.; Pullmann, D.; Chao, Y.S.; Eid, M.; Jhou, T.C. Three rostromedial tegmental afferents drive triply dissociable aspects of punishment learning and aversive valence encoding. *Neuron*, **2019**, *104*(5), 987-999.e4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.040 PMID: 31627985

[131] Kelland, M.D.; Freeman, A.S.; Rubin, J.; Chiodo, L.A. Ascending afferent regulation of rat midbrain dopamine neurons. *Brain Res. Bull.*, **1993**, *31*(5), 539-546.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(93)90121-Q PMID: 8495379

[132] Sun, L.; Liu, R.; Guo, F.; Wen, M.; Ma, X.; Li, K.; Sun, H.; Xu, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhu, Z.; Li, X.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Duan, S. Parabrachial nucleus circuit governs neuropathic pain-like behavior. *Nat. Commun.*, **2020**, *11*(1), 5974.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19767-w PMID: 33239627

[133] Saper, C.B.; Loewy, A.D. Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. *Brain Res.*, **1980**, *197*(2), 291-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(80)91117-8 PMID: 7407557

[134] Halsell, C.B. Organization of parabrachial nucleus afferents to the thalamus and amygdala in the golden hamster. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1992**, *317*(1), 57-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903170105 PMID: 1374087

[135] Al Tannir, R.; Pautrat, A.; Baufreton, J.; Overton, P.G.; Coizet, V. The subthalamic nucleus: A hub for sensory control via short three-lateral loop connections with the brainstem? *Curr. Neuropharmacol.*, **2022**, 2022 Online ahead of print
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X20666220718113548 PMID: 35850655

[136] Jahanshahi, M.; Obeso, I.; Baunez, C.; Alegre, M.; Krack, P. Parkinson's disease, the subthalamic nucleus, inhibition, and impulsivity. *Mov. Disord.*, **2015**, *30*(2), 128-140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.26049 PMID: 25297382

[137] Carrive, P. The periaqueductal gray and defensive behavior: Functional representation and neuronal organization. *Behav. Brain Res.*, **1993**, *58*(1-2), 27-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(93)90088-8 PMID: 8136048

[138] Bandler, R.; Shipley, M.T. Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: Modules for emotional expression? *Trends Neurosci.*, **1994**, *17*(9), 379-389.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(94)90047-7 PMID: 7817403

[139] Koutsikou, S.; Apps, R.; Lumb, B.M. Top down control of spinal sensorimotor circuits essential for survival. *J. Physiol.*, **2017**, *595*(13), 4151-4158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP273360 PMID: 28294351

[140] Silva, C.; McNaughton, N. Are periaqueductal gray and dorsal raphe the foundation of appetitive and aversive control? A comprehensive review. *Prog. Neurobiol.*, **2019**, *177*, 33-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.001 PMID: 30786258

[141] Keay, K.A.; Bandler, R. Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.*, **2001**, *25*(7-8), 669-678.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00049-5 PMID: 11801292

[142] Keay, K.A.; Crowfoot, L.J.; Floyd, N.S.; Henderson, L.A.; Christie, M.J.; Bandler, R. Cardiovascular effects of microinjections of opioid agonists into the 'Depressor Region' of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray region. *Brain Res.*, **1997**, *762*(1-2), 61-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00285-0 PMID: 9262159

[143] Tovote, P.; Esposito, M.S.; Botta, P.; Chaudun, F.; Fadok, J.P.; Markovic, M.; Wolff, S.B.E.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Fenno, L.; Deisseroth, K.; Herry, C.; Arber, S.; Lüthi, A. Midbrain circuits for defensive behaviour. *Nature*, **2016**, *534*(7606), 206-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature17996 PMID: 27279213

[144] La-Vu, M.Q.; Sethi, E.; Maesta-Pereira, S.; Schuette, P.J.; Tobias, B.C.; Reis, F.M.C.V.; Wang, W.; Torossian, A.; Bishop, A.; Leonard, S.J.; Lin, L.; Cahill, C.M.; Adhikari, A. Sparse genetically defined neurons refine the canonical role of periaqueductal gray columnar organization. *eLife*, **2022**, *11*, e77115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77115 PMID: 35674316

[145] Tracey, I.; Ploghaus, A.; Gati, J.S.; Clare, S.; Smith, S.; Menon, R.S.; Matthews, P.M. Imaging attentional modulation of pain in the periaqueductal gray in humans. *J. Neurosci.*, **2002**, *22*(7), 2748-2752.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02748.2002 PMID: 11923440

[146] Jürgens, U. The neural control of vocalization in mammals: A review. *J. Voice*, **2009**, *23*(1), 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.07.005 PMID: 18207362

[147] Paterson, D.J. Defining the neurocircuitry of exercise hyperpnoea. *J. Physiol.*, **2014**, *592*(3), 433-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.261586 PMID: 23918772

[148] Subramanian, H.H. Descending control of the respiratory neuronal network by the midbrain periaqueductal gray in the rat *in vivo*. *J. Physiol.*, **2013**, *591*(1), 109-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245217 PMID: 23129795

[149] Faull, O.K.; Subramanian, H.H.; Ezra, M.; Pattinson, K.T.S. The midbrain periaqueductal gray as an integrative and interoceptive neural structure for breathing. *Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.*, **2019**, *98*, 135-144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.020 PMID: 30611797

[150] Bowery, N.G.; Hudson, A.L.; Price, G.W. GABAA and GABAB receptor site distribution in the rat central nervous system. *Neuroscience*, **1987**, *20*(2), 365-383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(87)90098-4 PMID: 3035421

[151] Samineni, V.K.; Grajales-Reyes, J.G.; Copits, B.A.; O'Brian, D.E.; Trigg, S.L.; Gomez, A.M.; Bruchas, M.R.; Gereau, R.W. Divergent modulation of nociception by glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal subpopulations in the periaqueductal gray. *eNeuro*, **2017**, *4*(2) http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0129-16.2017

[152] McNally, G.P.; Johansen, J.P.; Blair, H.T. Placing prediction into the fear circuit. *Trends Neurosci.*, **2011**, *34*(6), 283-292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.03.005 PMID: 21549434

[153] Wright, K.M.; McDannald, M.A. Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray neurons prioritize threat probability over fear output. *eLife*, **2019**, *8*, e45013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45013 PMID: 30843787

[154] Yeh, L.F.; Ozawa, T.; Johansen, J.P. Functional organization of the midbrain periaqueductal gray for regulating aversive memory formation. *Mol. Brain*, **2021**, *14*(1), 136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00844-0 PMID: 34496926

[155] Krout, K.E.; Loewy, A.D. Periaqueductal gray matter projections to midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei of the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2000**, *424*(1), 111-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20000814)424:1<111::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-3 PMID: 10888743

[156] Smith, Y.; Raju, D.V.; Pare, J.F.; Sidibe, M. The thalamostritial system: A highly specific network of the basal ganglia circuitry. *Trends Neurosci.*, **2004**, *27*(9), 520-527.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.07.004 PMID: 15331233

[157] Vertes, R.P.; Hoover, W.B. Projections of the paraventricular and paratenial nuclei of the dorsal midline thalamus in the rat. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2008**, *508*(2), 212-237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.21679 PMID: 18311787

[158] Cameron, A.A.; Khan, I.A.; Westlund, K.N.; Willis, W.D. The afferent projections of the periaqueductal gray in the rat: APhaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin study. II. Descending projections. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **1995**, *351*(4), 585-601.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903510408 PMID: 7721985

[159] Geisler, S.; Zahm, D.S. Afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat-anatomical substratum for integrative functions. *J. Comp. Neurol.*, **2005**, *490*(3), 270-294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.20668 PMID: 16082674

[160] Geisler, S.; Derst, C.; Veh, R.W.; Zahm, D.S. Glutamatergic afferents of the ventral tegmental area in the rat. *J. Neurosci.*, **2007**, *27*(21), 5730-5743.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0012-07.2007 PMID: 17522317

[161] Kender, R.G.; Harte, S.E.; Munn, E.M.; Borszcz, G.S. Affective analgesia following muscarinic activation of the ventral tegmental area in rats. *J. Pain*, **2008**, *9*(7), 597-605.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.334 PMID: 18387853
[162] Li, C.; Sugam, J.A.; Lowery-Gionta, E.G.; McElligott, Z.A.; McCall, N.M.; Lopez, A.J.; McKlveen, J.M.; Pleil, K.E.; Kash, T.L. Mu opioid receptor modulation of dopamine neurons in the periaqueductal gray/dorsal raphe: A role in regulation of pain. *Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016*, *41*(8), 2122-2132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.12 PMID: 26792442

[163] Pezze, M.; Feldon, J. Mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways in fear conditioning. *Prog. Neurobiol.*, **2004**, *74*(5), 301-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.09.004 PMID:
15582224

[164] Tan, K.R.; Yvon, C.; Turiault, M.; Mirzabekov, J.J.; Doehner, J.; Labouèbe, G.; Deisseroth, K.; Tye, K.M.; Lüscher, C. GABA neurons of the VTA drive conditioned place aversion. *Neuron*, **2012**, *73*(6), 1173-1183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.015 PMID: 22445344

[165] Ntamati, N.R.; Creed, M.; Achargui, R.; Lüscher, C. Correction: Periaqueductal efferents to dopamine and GABA neurons of the VTA. *PLoS One*, **2019**, *14*(7), e0219476.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219476 PMID: 31269079

[166] Suckow, S.K.; Deichsel, E.L.; Ingram, S.L.; Morgan, M.M.; Aicher, S.A. Columnar distribution of catecholaminergic neurons in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and their relationship to ef-ferent pathways. *Synapse*, **2013**, *67*(2), 94-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/syn.21624 PMID: 23152302

[167] Omelchenko, N.; Sesack, S.R. Periaqueductal gray afferents synapse onto dopamine and GABA neurons in the rat ventral tegmental area. *J. Neurosci. Res.*, **2010**, *88*(5), 981-991.
PMID: 19885830

[168] Waung, M.W.; Margolis, E.B.; Charbit, A.R.; Fields, H.L. A Mid-brain circuit that mediates headache aversiveness in rats. *Cell Rep.*, **2019**, *28*(11), 2739-2747.e4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.009 PMID: 31509737

[169] Goodale, M.A. How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception. *Proc. Biol. Sci.*, **2014**, *281*(1785), 20140337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0337 PMID: 24789899