# Editorial: From landscape modifications to pathogen infections: are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?

Joice Ruggeri, David Lesbarrères

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Joice Ruggeri, David Lesbarrères. Editorial: From landscape modifications to pathogen infections: are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?. Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science, 2025, 3, 10.3389/famrs.2025.1538480. [hal-05061798](https://hal-05061798)

HAL Id: hal-05061798

https://univ-angers.hal.science/hal-05061798v1

Submitted on 9 May 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for updates

OPEN ACCESS

EDITED AND REVIEWED BY
Carly Rae Muletz-Wolz,
National Zoological Park (SI), United States

*CORRESPONDENCE

Jice Ruggeri

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

joice.ruggeri@gmail.com

RECEIVED 02 December 2024

ACCEPTED 18 February 2025

PUBLISHED 06 March 2025

CITATION

Ruggeri J and Lesbarrères D (2025) Editorial: From landscape modifications to pathogen infections: are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?

Front. Amphib. Reptile Sci. 3:1538480.
doi: 10.3389/famrs.2025.1538480

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Ruggeri and Lesbarrères. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the [Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

# Editorial: From landscape modifications to pathogen infections: are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?

Jice Ruggeri¹* and David Lesbarrères²,³

¹Instituto de Biología Subtropical Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Misiones), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales (UNaM), Posadas, Misiones, Argentina, ²Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, ³Laboratoire Biodiv'AG, UFR Sciences, Université d'Angers, Angers, France

KEYWORDS

emerging infectious disease (EID), habitat modification, anthropogenic activities, population declines, conservation

## Editorial on the Research Topic

From landscape modifications to pathogen infections: are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?

## Background

Anthropogenic actions have been altering ecosystems for decades, thus impacting biodiversity globally, with a special risk looming on amphibians. Threats range from the direct use of land and habitat modification to the indirect effects of biological invasions and pathogen emergence (Green et al., 2020). Articles published in this Research Topic highlight the consequences of human disturbance on the health of amphibians by either reporting the direct cause of harm or the mitigation measures aimed at their conservation.

## Complexity and interplay of threats to amphibian species

Among human-induced threats to amphibians, the emergence of infectious diseases caused by novel (or more virulent) pathogens, such as *Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis* (Bd), *B. salamandrivorans* (Bsal), and *Ranavirus* (Rv), is largely associated with amphibian declines worldwide (Teacher et al., 2010; Scheele et al., 2019). Bd and Rv present a global distribution, whereas Bsal remains restricted geographically due to several efforts to contain its spread (Fisher and Garner, 2020; Olson et al., 2024). In the UK, Ball et al. detected patterns of mtDNA haplotypes in populations of the invasive Alpine newt (*Ichthyosaura alpestris*) compatible with newts from the pet trade, suggesting there is an ongoing release of the species in the territory. Such repeated introductions represent a great danger to native species, as Alpine newts usually remain asymptomatic to infection (Daversa et al., 2018) and could potentially spread diseases. For instance, harlequin frogs (*Atelopus spp.*) are flagships for those species
that have suffered severe population declines due to chytridiomycosis (La Marca et al., 2005). While some species adapted to Bd following outbreaks resulting in a few presumably extinct species reappearing (Jaynes et al., 2022), many others remain declining; thus, reestablishing populations is highly important from a conservation perspective. To this end, Klocke et al. monitored the transition of *Atelopus limosus* from captivity to sites within the species' historical range in Panama and showed that a 30-day acclimatization is crucial for successful release and survival of captivity-bred individuals.

The persistence of Bd in the environment is related to the susceptibility of hosts (Carvalho et al., 2024) and the presence of ideal microclimates for its development (Longcore et al., 1999). Santos et al. detected higher prevalence of Bd in tadpoles from forested sites than in agricultural sites in Brazil, likely due to the shading provided by canopy cover (Becker and Zamudio, 2011). The authors employed a species-indicator analysis to identify species prone to Bd infection, and used this result to infer which community would likely be Bd-positive. The study confirmed tadpoles of *Boana faber* as highly susceptible to Bd (Ruggeri et al., 2020), in addition to two species endemic to southern Brazil (*Boana curupi* and *Crossodactylus schmidti*), which could be indicators for the Bd presence in a community. The presence of Rv, another pathogen posing enormous risks to amphibians globally (Gray and Chinchar, 2024), was also investigated on 10 anuran species but was not detected. This does not refute the presence of Rv in the area as the infection may be seasonal (Hall et al., 2018) and was previously detected in the region (Ruggeri et al., 2024), indicating it should be continuously investigated. Water pollution has also been associated with Bd (Jacinto-Maldonado et al., 2023) and Jacinto-Maldonado et al. corroborate this by detecting high prevalence on sites with continuous wastewater discharge. In addition, they detected elevated concentrations of chemical elements known to pose a risk of bioaccumulation and that may transfer through the food chain on sites with amphibians coinfect ed by Bd and the mite.

As aforementioned, biological invasions pose a major threat to amphibians not only for disease transmission, but also due to competition and hybridization with native species (Kraus, 2015), a point highlighted by Borzée et al. with regard to the Japanese and Chinese giant salamanders. Many invasive amphibians can easily adapt and expand their distribution range rapidly. This is the case for the American bullfrog (*Lithobates catesbeianus*) worldwide, the cane toad (*Rhinella marina*) in Australia, and more recently, the Lesser Antillean frog (*Eleutherodactylus johnstonei*) in Brazil (Frost, 2024). Melo et al. explored acoustic consequences of invasions on the behavior of native species, showing that native pond breeder amphibians in Brazil ceased calling in the presence of callings from *E. johnstonei*. Both and Grant (2012) had shown how calls from invasive bullfrogs caused a shift on calls from a native species in Brazil, suggesting that such acoustic competition could impact the reproductive success of species in the same acoustic niche. Although they highlight that *E. johnstonei* is a direct-developing frog and such encounter with pond breeders would rarely occur in the wild, the reproductive season of this and most species in Brazil overlaps (Bertoluci, 1998; Tárano and Fuenmayor, 2009), and the presence

of the invader could indeed cause acoustic interferences, thus impacting native anurans.

## Are threats to amphibians the same in all biomes?

We learned with this Research Topic that the international movement of live animals and habitat fragmentation resulting from agriculture, urbanization, and waterway obstructions (dams and weirs) can affect amphibians differently, but the result is often the same: populations decline. While threats may be of different nature or strengths, amphibians rarely face only one of them (Green et al., 2020). Therefore, recognizing the main threats to amphibian populations is a primary step toward species conservation.

Borzée et al. reviewed the dangers faced by the Japanese giant salamander given the current state of the environment where the population persists, proposing actions to allow the species to thrive. Klocke et al. concluded that a 30-day acclimatization is crucial for the successful release and survival of captivity-bred *Atelopus limosus* in Panama, providing data to potentially improve and refine release methods for other species. Santos et al. identified potential Bd-indicator species in Brazil that would allow researchers to focus on communities composed of such species when screening for Bd, and highlighted forest patches within disturbed habitats as priority areas for conservation. In Mexico, Jacinto-Maldonado et al. showed that species from degraded areas would be highly susceptible to Bd infection and coinfection with parasite/pathogens, and the lowland leopard frog (*Lithobates yavapaiensis*), a species suffering severe population declines (IUCN, 2024), presented the highest Bd loads. We also learned that pet trade continues to play an important role in introducing alien species in the UK as reported by Ball et al. This practice compromises natural ecosystems and ecological relationships worldwide by causing biological invasions that may lead to acoustic interferences and changes in the behavior of native species, as exposed by Melo et al. Overall, threats are diverse and complex, and only a comprehensive approach to each ecosystem will help the conservation of amphibians.

## Author contributions

JR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

## Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
## Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated

organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

## References

Becker, C. G., and Zamudio, K. R. (2011). Tropical amphibian populations experience higher disease risk in natural habitats. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.* 108, 9893–9898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014497108

Bertoluci, J. (1998). Annual patterns of breeding activity in atlantic rainforest anurans. *J. Herpetol* 32, 607–611. doi: 10.2307/1565223

Both, C., and Grant, T. (2012). Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs. *Biol. Lett.* 8, 714–716. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0412

Carvalho, T., Belasen, A. M., Toledo, L. F., and James, T. Y. (2024). Coevolution of a generalist pathogen with many hosts: the case of the amphibian chytrid *Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis*. *Curr. Opin. Microbiol.* 78, 102435. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2024.102435

Daversa, D. R., Manica, A., Bosch, J., Jolles, J. W., and Garner, T. W. (2018). Routine habitat switching alters the likelihood and persistence of infection with a pathogenic parasite. *Funct. Ecol.* 32, 1262–1270. doi: 10.1111/fec.2018.32.issue-5

Fisher, M. C., and Garner, T. W. J. (2020). Chytrid fungi and global amphibian decline. *Nat. Rev. Microbiol.* 18, 332–343. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0335-x

Frost, D. R. (2024). *Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference*. V. 6.2 (New York, USA: American Museum of Natural History). Available at: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php (Accessed November 28, 2024).

Gray, M. J., and Chinchar, V. G. (2024). *Ranaviruses: emerging pathogens of ectothermic vertebrates*, 2nd. (New York: Springer Nature), 371.

Green, D. M., Lannoo, M. J., Lesbarrères, D., and Muths, E. (2020). Amphibian population declines: 30 years of progress in confronting a complex problem. *Herpetologica* 76, 97–100. doi: 10.1655/0018-0831-76.2.97

Hall, E. M., Goldberg, C. S., Brunner, J. L., and Crespi, E. J. (2018). Seasonal dynamics and potential drivers of ranavirus epidemics in wood frog populations. *Oecologia* 188, 1253–1262. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4274-4

IUCN (2024). *The IUCN Red list of threatened species*. Available online at: https://www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed November 28, 2024).

Jacinto-Maldonado, M., González-Salazar, C., Basanta, M. D., Garcia-Peña, G. E., Saucedo, B., Lesbarrères, D., et al. (2023). Water pollution increases the risk of Chytridiomycosis in Mexican amphibians. *EcoHealth* 20, 74–83. doi: 10.1007/s10393-023-01631-0

Jaynes, K. E., Páez-Vacas, M. I., Salazar-Valenzuela, D., Guayasamin, J. M., Terán-Valdez, A., Siavichay, F. R., et al. (2022). Harlequin frog rediscoveries provide insights into species persistence in the face of drastic amphibian declines. *Biol. Conserv.* 276, 109784. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109784

Kraus, F. (2015). Impacts from invasive reptiles and amphibians. *Annu. Rev. Ecol Evol Systematics* 46, 75–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054450

La Marca, E., Lips, K. R., Lötters, S., Puschendorf, R., Ibáñez, R., Rueda-Almonacid, J. V., et al. (2005). Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: *Atelopus*) 1. *Biotropica: J. Biol. Conserv.* 37, 190–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00026.x

Longcore, J. E., Pessier, A. P., and Nichols, D. K. (1999). *Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis* gen. et sp. nov., a chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. *Mycologia* 91, 219–227. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061011

Olson, D. H., Grant, E. H. C., Bletz, M., Piovia-Scott, J., Lesbarrères, D., Kerby, J. L., et al. (2024). Preparing for a Bsal invasion into North America has improved multi-sector readiness. *Front. Amphibian Reptile Sci.* 2, 1347541. doi: 10.3389/famrs.2024.1347541

Ruggeri, J., Martins, A. G. D. S., Domingos, A. H. R., Santos, I., Viroomal, I. B., and Toledo, L. F. (2020). Seasonal prevalence of the amphibian chytrid in a tropical pond-dwelling tadpole species. *Dis. Aquat. Organisms* 142, 171–176. doi: 10.3354/dao03539

Ruggeri, J., Pontes, M. R., Ribeiro, L. P., Gendreau, K. L., Sousa, R. L. M., and Toledo, L. F. (2024). Predominant prevalence of Ranavirus in southern Brazil, a region with widespread occurrence of the amphibian chytrid. *Anim. Conserv.* 27, 338–349. doi: 10.1111/acv.12911

Scheele, B. C., Pasmans, F., Skerratt, L. F., Berger, L., Martel, A. N., Beukema, W., et al. (2019). Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. *Science* 363, 1459–1463. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0379

Tárano, Z., and Fuenmayor, E. (2009). Calling patterns in male responses to conspecific Playbacks in the Johnstone's whistling frog *Eleutherodactylus johnstonei*. *Ethology* 115, 747–757.

Teacher, A. G. F., Cunningham, A. A., and Garner, T. W. J. (2010). Assessing the long-term impact of ranavirus infection in wild common frog populations. *Anim. Conserv.* 13, 514–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00373.x