Audring, Jenny & Geert Booj. 2016. Cooperation and coercion. *Linguistics* 54(4): 617–637.

Audring, Jenny, Booj Geert & Jackendoff Ray. 2017. Menscheln, kibbelen, sparkle: Verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon. In Bert Le Bruyn & Sander Lestrade (dirs.). *Linguistics in the Netherlands* 2017. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 1-15.

Auer, Peter & Murray Robert W. (dir.). 2015. *Hermann Paul's Principles of Language History Revisited Translations and Reflections*. De Gruyter.

Bat-El, Outi. 2006. Blends. In Keith Brown. (dir.). *Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics*, Second edition, Vol. 2, Oxford: Elsevier: 66-70.

Baicchi, Annelisa. 2011. Metaphoric motivation in grammatical structure. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günther Radden (dirs.). Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 149-170.

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. *Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bauer, Laurie. 1983. *English Word-formation*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bauer, Laurie. 1988. *Introducing Linguistic Morphology*. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bauer, Laurie & Nation, Paul. 1993. Word families. *International Journal of Lexicography*, Vol. 6 No. 4: 253-279.

Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Geert Booj & Jaap Van Marle (dirs.). *Yearbook of Morphology* 1996. Dordrecht: Springer: 243-256.

Bauer, Laurie. 2001. What you can do with derivational morphology. In Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (dirs.). *Morphology 2000: selected papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting*. Vienna, 24–28 February 2000: 37-48.

Bauer, Laurie. 2006. Competition in English Word Formation. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (dirs.). *The Handbook of the History of English*. Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell: 177–198.

Bauer, Laurie. 2008. Dvandvas. *Word Structure* 1 1:1-18. Bauer, Laurie. 2014. Rare, obscure and marginal affixes in English. *Lexis* 8. http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/304 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.304 Consulté le 10 juin 2020.

Bauer, Laurie. 2018. Conversion as Metonymy. *Word Structure* 11.2 (2018): 175–184.

Bauer, Laurie. 2019. Complex lexical units in English. In Barbara Schlücker (dir.). *Complex lexical units: compounds and multi-word expressions*. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter: 45-68.

Beckner Clay, Blythe Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen Morten H., Croft William, Ellis Nick C., Holland John Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman Diane & Schoenemann Tom (The Five Graces Group). 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper, in Language as a complex adaptive system. In Nick Ellis & Diane Larsen-Freeman (dirs.). *Language Learning* 59: Suppl. 1, December: 1-26.

Bergen, Benjamin-K. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. *Language*, 80(2), 290–311.

Bergen, Benjamin-K. 2015. Embodiment, simulation and meaning. In Nick Riemer (dir.). *The Routledge Handbook of Semantics*. 142-157.

Benczes, Reka. 2019. *Rhyme over Reason: Phonological motivation in English*. Cambridge University Press.
Beuls, Katrien & van Trip, Remi. 2016. Computational construction grammar and constructional change. In *Belgian Journal of Linguistics*, Volume 30, Issue 1: 1 – 13.

Blank, Andreas. 1997. Outlines of a Cognitive Approach to Word-Formation. *Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists*, Paper No. 0291. Oxford: Pergamon.

Blank, Andreas. 1999. Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (dirs.). *Historical Semantics and Cognition*. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter: 61-89.

Blank, Andreas. 2003. Words and concepts in time: towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In Regina Eckardt (dir.). *Words in time: diachronic semantics from different points of view*. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter: 37–66.

Blevins, James P., Farrell Ackerman & Robert, Malouf. 2019. Word and paradigm morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory*, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 265–84.

Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. *Forms of English. Accent morpheme order*. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.

Bolinger, Dwight. 1988. Reiconization. *World Englishes*. Vol. 7, No. 3: 237-242.

Booij, Geert 2005. *The Grammar of Words: An introduction to Linguistic Morphology*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, Geert. 2010. *Construction morphology*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booij, Geert & Audring Jenny. 2015. Construction Morphology and the Parallel Architecture of Grammar, in *Cognitive Science*: 1–26.

Booij, Geert. 2016. Construction morphology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (dir.). *The Cambridge handbook of morphology*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 424 - 448.

Booij, Geert. 2018. The construction of words: Introduction and overview. In Geert Booij (dir.), *The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology*. Dordrecht: Springer: 3–18

Booij, Geert & Audring, Jenny. 2018. Partial Motivation, Multiple Motivation: The Role of Output Schemas in Morphology. In Geert Booij (dir.). *The construction of words. Advances in construction morphology*. Dordrecht: Springer: 59-80.

Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel, & Walkden, George. 2015. On constructing a theory of grammatical change. *Transactions of the Philological Society*, 113(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12068.

Bottineau, Didier. 2002. Les cognèmes de l'anglais : principes théoriques. Le système des parties du discours, *Sémantique et syntaxe, Actes du IXe colloque de l'Association internationale de psychomécanique du langage*, 2002, Québec, Canada : 23-437. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00012378/document

Bottineau Didier. 2012. « Submorphémique et corporéité cognitive », *Miranda* [En ligne], 7 | 2012, mis en ligne le 09 décembre 2012, consulté le 16 février 2021. http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/5350 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.5350

Boula de Mareüil, Philippe Gilles Adda, Martine Adda-Decker, Claude Barras, Benoît Habert et Patrick Paroubek. 2013. « Une étude quantitative des marqueurs discursifs, disfluences et chevauchements de parole dans des interviews politiques ». *TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage*
29. Consulté le 17 janvier 2022. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/tipa/830 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.830

Bousfield, Derek. 2008. *Impoliteness in interaction*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia : John Benjamins.

Boussidan Armelle, Renon Anne-Lyse, Franco Charlotte, Lupone Sylvain & Ploux Sabine. 2012. Repérage automatique de la néologie sémantique en corpus à travers des représentations cartographiques évolutives : vers une méthode de visualisation graphique dynamique de la diachronie de la néologie. *Cahiers de Lexicologie*, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique : 1-18.

Bretaña, José-Manuel Pazos & Bertrán, Antonio Pamies. 2008. Combined statistical and grammatical criteria for the retrieval of phraseological units in an electronic corpus. In Granger, S. et F. Meunier (dirs.), *Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 391-406.

Brône Geert, Zima Elisabeth. 2014. Towards a dialogic construction grammar: *Ad hoc* routines and resonance activation. *Cognitive Linguistics*: 25(3): 457 – 495.

Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. *Politeness: some universals in language usage*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brugman Claudia, Lakoff George. 2006. Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Dirk Geeraerts dir.) *Cognitive linguistics: Basic Readings*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 109-140.

Budts, Sara & Petré Peter. 2020. Putting connections centre stage in diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Smirnova & Elena Sommerer (dirs.). *Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 347-352.

Busse, Beatrix & Moehlig-Falke Ruth. 2019. Patterns in linguistics: This volume, its aims and its contributions. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Moelig-Falke (dirs.). *Patterns in Language and Linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept*. Berlin: de Gruyter. 1-9.

Buyle, Anouk. & De Smet, Hendrik. 2017. Meaning in a changing paradigm: the semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou, *Language Sciences*: 42-55.

Bybee, Joan L. 2007. *Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language*, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bybee, Joan L 2010a. Diachronic linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts et Hubert Cuyckens (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 945-987.

Bybee, Joan L. 2010b. *Language, usage and cognition*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions. In Thomas Hoffman et Graeme Trousdale (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-14.

Bybee, Joan L & Hopper, Paul (dirs.). 2001. *Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cartier Emmanuel. 2016. Neoveille, système de repérage et de suivi des néologismes en sept langues, *Neologica* 10 : 101-131.

Corpas Pastor, Gloria & Colson Jean-Pierre (dirs.). 2020. *Computational Phraseology*, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Croft, William & Cruse. D. Alan 2004. *Cognitive linguistics* (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cruse, David A. 1986. *Lexical Semantics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coussé, Evie & Von Mengden, Ferdinand. 2014. *Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Culpeper, Jonathan & Clapham, Phoebe. 1996. The Borrowing of Classical and Romance Words into English: A Study Based on the Electronic Oxford English Dictionary. *International Journal of Corpus Linguistics* 1:2:199-218.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. *Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2013. Impoliteness. In Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (dirs.) *Handbook of Pragmatics*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 1-18.

Curzan, Anne & Palmer Chris C. 2011, The Importance of Historical Corpora, Reliability, and Reading. In Roberta Facchineti & Matti Rissanen (dirs.). *Corpus Based Studies of Diachronic English*. Bern: Peter Lang: 17-36.

Dabrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics' seven deadly sins. *Cognitive Linguistics*, 27: 479-491.

Danon-Boileau, Laurent. 1993. De quelques préjugés relatifs à l'usage des notions de motivation et d'iconicité. *Faits de langues, 1, Motivation et iconicité*, Paris, PUF : 79-87.

Davies, Mark. 2019. The Importance of Both Corpus Size and Corpus Design. In Terttu Nevalainen, Carla Suhr and Irma Taavitsainen (dirs.). *Corpus-based Studies of Lexical and Semantic Variation*. Leiden/Boston: Brill: 66-87.

Davies, Mark & Chapman, Don. 2016, The effect of representativeness and size in historical corpora: An empirical study of changes in lexical frequency. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (dirs.). *Studies in the History of the English Language VII* (Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis): 131-150.

De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2008. *Limiting the iconic: from the metatheoretical foundations to the creative possibilities of iconicity in language*. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

de Gorog, Ralph 1982. The application of onomasiology to synonymy, word formation, and etymology. *Word* 32(2), 99-108.

Depecker Loïc. 1999. Monème, synthème et phrasème. Essai d'introduction du concept de phrasème dans la théorie fonctionnaliste. *La Linguistique*, vol. 35/2 : 23-46.

De Smet, Hendrik. 2014. Does innovation need reanalysis? In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand Von Mengden (dirs.). *Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change*, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 23-48.

De Smet, Hendrik. 2016a. The root of ruthless. Individual variation as a window on mental representation. *International Journal of Corpus Linguistics*21(2): 250-271.

De Smet, Hendrik. 2016b. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. *Language Variation and Change*, 28(1); 83-102.
De Smet, Hendrik & Fischer, Olga. 2017. The Role of Analogy in Language Change: Supporting Constructions. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin, & Simone E. Pfenninger (dirs.). *The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 240–68.

De Smet, Hendrik, D'hoedt, Frauke, Fonteyn Lauren & Van Goethem Kristel, 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. *Cognitive Linguistics* 2018; 29(2): 197–234.

Derwing, Bruce L. 1990. Morphology and the mental lexicon: psycholinguistic evidence. In Wolfgang U., Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E Pfeiffer & John R Rennison (dirs.). *Contemporary Morphology*. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter: 249-266.

Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen, & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, Vol. 19, No. 10: 603-615.

Dingemanse, Mark, Will Schuerman, Eva Reinisch, Sylvia Tufvesson et Holger Mitterer. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. *Language*, Volume 92, Number 2, PAGE

Diwersy, Sascha, Laetitia Gonon, Vannina Goossens, Olivier Kraif, Iva Novakova, Julie Sorba et Ilaria Vidotto. 2021. « La phraséologie du roman contemporain dans les corpus et les applications de la PhraseoBase ». *Corpus*, 22. Consulté le 04 novembre 2021.
http://journals.openedition.org/corpus/610 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.6101

Dostie, Gaétane, et Claus D. Pusch. 2007. « Présentation. Les marqueurs discursifs. Sens et variation ». *Langue française*, vol. 154, no. 2 : 3-12.

Dostie, Gaétane. 2018. *Synonymie et marqueurs de haut degré*. Paris : Garnier.

Drellishak, Scott. 2006. « Statistical techniques for detecting and validating honestemes ». University of Washington, Washington.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Luschützky Hans C., Pfeiffer Oskar E. & Rennison John R. 1990. *Contemporary morphology*. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter.

Du Bois John W. 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. *Cognitive Linguistics*: 25(3): 359 – 410.

Durkin, Philip. 2009. *The Oxford Guide to Etymology*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durkin, Philip 2012. Commentary: Data and Sources. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna A Robinson (dirs.). *Current Methods in Historical Semantics*, Berlin/ Boston: de Gruyter: 97-105.

Durkin, Philip. 2014. *Borrowed Words. A History of Loanwords in English*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durkin, Philip. 2016a. *The Oxford Handbook of Lexicography*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durkin, Philip. 2016b. The OED and HTOED as tools in practical research: A test case examining the impact of loan words on areas of the core lexicon. In Kýto Merja (dir.). *The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 390-406.

Ekman Paul, Friesen Wallace V., & Hager Joseph C. 2002. *Facial Action Coding System: CD Rom*.

Elleström, Lars. 2010. Iconicity as meaning miming meaning and meaning miming form. *Signergy, Iconicity in language and literature* 9, John Benjamins: 73-100.
Enghels, Renata. 2018. Towards a constructional approach to discourse-level phenomena: The case of the Spanish interpersonal epistemic stance construction. *Folia Linguistica* 52(1): 107–138.

Evans, Roger, Gelbukh Alexander, Grefenstette Gregory, Hanks Patrick, Jakubícek Miloš, McCarthy Diana, Palmer Martha, Pedersen Ted, Rundell Michael, Rychlý Pavel, Sharoff Serge, Tugwell David. 2016. Kilgarriff’s Legacy to Computational Linguistics and Beyond. CICLing 2016 conference.

Evers Vincent, Reetz Henning & Lahiri Aditi. 1998. Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status. *Journal of Phonetics* 26, 345–370.

Facchini, Roberta & Rissanen, Matti. 2011. *Corpus Based Studies of Diachronic English*. Bern: Peter Lang.

Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark. 2002. *The way we think*. New York: Basic Books.

Feinsilver, Lillian Mermin. 1961. On Yiddish shm-. *American Speech*, Vol. 36, No. 4: 302-303.

Fellbaum, Christiane. 2015. Lexical Relations. In John R. Taylor (dir.). *The Oxford handbook of the Word*. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2010. Productivity vs lexicalization: frequency-based hypotheses on word formation. *Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics* 46(2): 193–219.

Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2013. Morphological Productivity Measurement: Exploring Qualitative versus Quantitative Approaches, *English Studies*, 94:4: 422-447

Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2017. Methodological and procedural issues in the quantification of morphological competition. In Santana-Lario Juan & Valera-Hernández Salvador (dirs.), *Competing Patterns in English Affixation*. Bern: Peter Lang: 67-117.

Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2019. Onomasiological approach. In Mark Aronoff (dir.) *Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics*. p. 1-28.

Fiala, Pierre. 1987. Pour une approche discursive de la phraséologie Remarques en vrac sur la locutionnalité et quelques points de vue qui s'y rapportent, sans doute. In *Langage et société*, n°42 : 27-44. doi :
https://doi.org/10.3406/lsoc.1987.2378
https://www.persee.fr/doc/lsoc_0181-4095_1987_num_42_1_237

Fillmore, Charles. 1977. Topics in Lexical Semantics. In Peter Cole (dir.). *Current Issues in Linguistics Theory*. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 76–138.

Fillmore Charles J., Kay Paul & O’Connor Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. *Language*, Vol. 64, No. 3: 501-538.

Firth, John. 1930. *Speech*. London: Ernest Benn.

Fischer, Olga. C. M. 1999. On the role played by iconicity in grammaticalisation processes. In Olga Fischer, & Max Nanny (dirs.). *Form Miming meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature*. Benjamins: 345-374.

Fischer, Olga. 2007. *Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fischer, Olga. 2010. An analogical approach to grammaticalization. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler and Ekkehard König (dirs.). *Grammaticalization: Current views and issues*:181–220.
Fischer, Olga. 2013. On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. *Studies in Language* 37(3), 515-533.

Flaksman, Maria. 2015a. Diachronicheskoye razvitie zvuloizobrazitelnoi leksiki angliiskgo yazika (Diachronic Development of English Iconic Vocabulary). PhD dissertation. University of St. Petersburg.

Flaksman, Maria. 2015b. Iconic words in Proto-Germanic. *Anglistics of the XXI century, vol. 2. Phonosemantics : in commemoration of Professor Dr. Stanislav Voronin's 80th anniversary / St. Petersburg state univ., Fac. of philology; ed. by M.A. Flaksman, O.I. Brodovich.* - St. Petersburg, 2016. 39-51.

Flaksman, Maria. 2017. Iconic treadmill hypothesis: The reasons behind continuous onomatopoeic coinage. In Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg (dirs.). *Dimensions of Iconicity, Iconicity in Language and Literature*, John Benjamins: 15-38.

Flaksman, Maria. 2019. From IE *ue to English window: On the age and number of imitative words in English. INDO-EUROPEAN LINGUISTICS AND CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY XXIII (Joseph M. Tronsky memorial Conference). In Nikolai N. Kazansky (dir.), *Proceedings of the International Conference*, St. Petersburg, 24-26 June, 2019 / Part II (pp. 635-1208). St. Petersburg: Nauka. 1067-1075.

Flaksman, Maria. 2020. Pathways of deICONIZATION: How borrowing, semantic evolution and sound change obscure iconicity. In Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (dirs.). *Operationalizing Iconicity*. John Benjamins: 75-104.

Fonagy, Ivan. 1993. Physei/Thesei, l'aspect évolutif d'un débat millénaire. *Faits de langues*, n°1, *Motivation et iconicité*: 29-45.

Forceville, Charles & Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo. 2009. *Multimodal Metaphor*. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.

Forceville Charles. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (dirs.). *Multimodal Metaphor*. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter. 18-44.

Forceville Charles. 2020. *Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle*. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fradin, Bernard. 2019. Competition in Derivation: What Can We Learn from French Doublets in -age and -ment. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang Dressler, & Hans Christian Luschützsky (dirs.). *Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation*. Cham: Springer: 67-93.

Fried, Mirjam. 2009. Construction grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. *Constructions and Frames* 1 (2): 262-291.

Fried Mirjam. 2010. Grammar and interaction. New directions in constructional research. *Constructions and Frames* 2:2: 125-133.

Fried, Mirjam. 2013. Principles of constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (dirs.). *The Oxford handbook of construction grammar*. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press: 419-437.

Fried, Mirjam & Östman Jan-Ola. 2005. Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. *Journal of Pragmatics* 37. 1752-1778.

Fried, Mirjam & Östman Jan-Ola. 2004. Historical and intellectual background of Construction grammar. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (dirs.). *Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective*: 1-10.
Gafni, Chen & Tsur, Reuven. 2019. Some Experimental Evidence for Sound-Emotion Interaction. *Scientific Study of Literature*. Volume 9, Issue 1:53–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19002.gaf

Galatanu Olga. 2018. Les fondements sémantiques de l'implicite argumentatif. In *Corela* HS-25. Consulté le 31 mai 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/corela/6577 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.6577

Gardani Francesco, Arkadiev Peter & Amiridze Nino. 2015. "Borrowed morphology. An overview". In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (dirs.). *Borrowed Morphology*, Berlin / Boston / Munich: De Gruyter:1-23.

Gardani Francesco, Rainer Franz, & Luschützky Hans Christian. 2019. Competition in Morphology: A Historical Outline. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang Dressler, & Hans Christian Luschützsky (dirs.). *Competition in inflection and word formation*. Springer: 3-38.

Garret, Andrew, Blevins Juliette. 2008. Analogical morphophonology. In Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inketas (dirs.). *The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky*, MIT press: 527-546.

Gaume Bruno, Venant Fabienne, Victorri Bernard. 2005. Hierarchy in lexical organisation of natural languages. In Denise Pumain (dir.). *Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences*. Kluwer : Academic Publishers.

Gaume Bruno, Duvignau Karine, Vanhove Martine. 2008. Semantic associations and confluences in paradigmatic networks. In Martine Vanhove (dir.). *From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 233-266.

Geeraerts, Dirk, 2010. *Theories of lexical semantics*. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2016a. Lexicography and Theories of lexical semantics. In Philip Durkin (dir.). *The Oxford Handbook of Lexicography*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 425-438.

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2016b. Entrenchment as Onomasiological Salience. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (dir.). *Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 153-174.

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2016c. Prospects and problems of prototype theory. *Dlachronica* 3. Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza Iași, Roumanie. doi https://doi.org/10.17684/i4A53en Consulté le 19 janvier 2022.

Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelars, Stefan & Bakema, Peter. 1994. *The Structure of Lexical Variation Meaning, Naming, and Context*. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.

Gentner, Dedre. 1983. Structure mapping. *Cognitive Science* 7: 155-170.

Ghesquière, Lobke, & Davidse Kristin. 2011. The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: sources, paths and mechanisms of change. *English Language and Linguistics*, 15: 251-277.

Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems Lieselotte, & Van de Velde Freek. 2015. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification
Typology and operationalization. *English Text Construction* 5:1: 128–152.

Ghosh Debanjan, Fabbri Alexander, R., Muresan Smaranda. 2018. Sarcasm Analysis Using Conversation Context. *Computational Linguistics* 44 (4): 755–792
Gibbs, Raymond. 2005. Embodied action in thought and language. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (dir). *Cognitive Linguistics Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction*. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter. 225-248.

Gladkova Anna, Vanhalato Ulla & Goddard Cliff. 2016. The semantics of interjections: An experimental study with natural semantic metalanguage. *Applied Psycholinguistics* 37: 841–865.

Gledhill, Christopher, & Frath Pierre. 2007. Collocation, phrasème, dénomination : vers une théorie de la créativité phraséologique. *La linguistique*. 1/1 : 63-88.

Glynn Dylan. 2014. Polysemy and synonymy Cognitive theory and corpus method. In Dylan Glynn & Robinson Justyna (dirs.). *Corpus methods for semantics*: 7-38.

Goddard, Cliff. 2014a. Interjections and emotion (with special reference to “surprise” and “disgust”. *Emotion Review*, 6: 53–63.

Goddard, Cliff. 2014b. On “disgust.” In Fabienne Baider & Georgeta Cislaru (dirs.). *Linguistic approaches to emotions in context*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 73-98.

Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. *Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures*. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. *Language* 54(4): 787–815.

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. *Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. *Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions*. Princeton : Princeton University Press.

Gonzales-Diaz, Victoria. 2008. *English adjective comparison*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Grzybek, Peter. 2015. Word Length. In John R Taylor. *The Oxford Handbook of the Word*. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Gregersen, Sune. 2018. Critical issues in diachronic Construction grammar. *Folia Linguistica Historica* 2018; 39(2): 341–360.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2004a. Shouldn’t it be breakfunch? A quantitative analysis of blend structure in English. *Linguistics* 42 3:639-667.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2004b. Some characteristics of English morphological blends. In *Papers from the 38th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Vol. II*. The Panels, Andronis M. A., E. Debenport, A.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. Cognitive determinants of subtractive word formation: A corpus-based perspective. *Cognitive Linguistics* 17 4: 535-558.

Gries, Stefan Th. 2011. Phonological similarity in multi word units. *Cognitive Linguistics* 22-3: 491–510.

Grieve, Jack. 2018. Natural Selection in the Modern English Lexicon. In *Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (Evolang12)*: 153-157.

Grieve, Jack, Nini Andrea & Guo Diansheng. 2017. Analyzing Lexical Emergence in Modern American English Online. In *English Language and Linguistics* 21(1): 99–127.
Grzega, Joachim. 2002. Some aspects of modern diachronic Onomasiology. *Linguistics* 40–5 (2002), 1021–1045.

Guiraud, Pierre. 1986. *Structures étymologiques du lexique français*. Paris, Payot. (éd. or. Larousse, 1967)

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation. *Language* 59: 781-819.

Hanks, Patrick & Jeûek Elisabetta. 2008. Shimmering lexical sets. *Euralex Proceedings*:391-402.

Hanks Patrick. 2008. *The Hornby Lecture (plenary). Lexical Patterns: from Hornby to Hunston and beyond.*
*Euralex proceedings:* 1-32.
http://www.patrickhanks.com/uploads/5/1/4/9/5149363/hornby_to_hunston.pdf Consulté le 4
novembre 2021.

Hanks, Patrick. 2013. *Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hanks, Patrick. 2020. How context determines meaning. In Gloria Corpas Pastor & Pierre Colson Jean- (dirs.).
*Computational Phraseology*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 297-310.

Harrison Simon, Larrivée Pierre. 2016. Morphosyntactic Correlates of Gestures: A Gesture Associated with
Negation in French and Its Organisation with Speech. In Pierre Larrivée and Chungmin Lee (dirs),
*Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives*, Language, Cognition, and Mind 1. Cham: Springer.
75-95. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_4

Hunston Susan & Francis Gill. 2000. *Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Harris, Zellig S. 1954. Distributional Structure. *WORD*, 10:2-3: 146-162.

Hay, Jennifer B. & Baayen, Harald R. 2005. Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology, *Trends in Cognitive Sciences* Vol.9 No.7: 342-348.

Hempelmann, Christian. 2017. Key terms in the field of humor. In Salvatore Attardo (dir.). *The Routledge Handbook of Humor*. Routledge: 34-48.

Herbst, Thomas. 2011. Choosing sandy beaches – Colocations, probabemes and the idiom principle. In Thomas Herbst, Susen Faulhaber, Peter Uhrig (dirs.). *The phraseological view of language: a tribute to John Sinclair*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 26-58.

Hilpert, Martin. 2012. Diachronic Collostructional Analysis. How to Use it and How to Deal with Confounding Factors. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson (dirs.). *Current Methods in Historical Semantics*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 133–160.

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. *Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hilpert, Martin 2014. *Construction Grammar and its Application to English*. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Hilpert, Martin & Bourgeois Samuel. 2020. Intersubjectification in constructional change: From confrontation to solidarity in the "Sarcastic much?" construction. *Constructions and Frames* 12/1, 96-120.
Hilpert, Martin & Cuyckens, Hubert. 2016. How do corpus-based techniques advance description and theory in English historical linguistics? An introduction to the special issue. *Corpus Linguistics and Ling. Theory* 2016; 12(1): 1–5.

Hilpert, Martin & Flach Suzanne. 2020. *Disentangling modal meanings with distributional semantics*. *Digital Scholarship in the Humanities*. Page 1-15.

Hilpert, Martin & Perek, Florent. 2015. Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts. *Linguistics Vanguard* 2015; 1(1): 339–350.

Hilpert, Martin & Perek, Florent. 2017. A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions. *International Journal of Corpus Linguistics* 22(4): 490–520.

Hinton, Leanne, Nicholas, Johanna & Ohala, John J. 2006 [1994]. *Sound Symbolism*. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hippisley, Andrew & Stump, Gregory. 2016. *The Cambridge handbook of morphology*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hiraga, Masako K. 1994. Diagrams and Metaphors: Iconic aspects in language. *Journal of Pragmatics*, Volume 22, Issue 1: 5-21.

Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian D. 2009. *Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship: An introduction to Historical and Comparative linguistics*. de Gruyter.

Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme, 2011. Variation change and constructions in English, *Cognitive Linguistics* 22–1 (2011): 1–23.

Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. *The Oxford Handbook of Construction grammar*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. The Renaissance of constructions: From constructions to Construction Grammars. In Barbara Dancygier (dir.). *the Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 284-309.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. *Linguistics Vanguard*: 1-10.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018. A construction grammar approach to creativity, *Linguistics Vanguard*.

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2019. *English Comparative Correlatives*. Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569859.003

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2020a. What would it take for us to abandon Construction Grammar? Falsifiability, confirmation bias and the future of the Constructionist Enterprise. *Belgian Journal of Linguistics*: 148–160.

Thomas Hoffmann. 2020b. Construction grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. *Cognitive Semiotics* 13 (1):

Hofstadter, Douglas. 2001. "Analogy as the core of cognition". In Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak and Boicho N. Kokinov (dirs.). *The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science*. M.I.T. Press : 116-144.

Hofstadter, Douglas & Sander, Emmanuel. 2013. *L'Analogie, cœur de la pensée*. Paris : Odile Jacob.
Holland, John 1995. *Hidden Order: How adaptation builds complexity*. Massachusetts: Helix Books.

Holland, John. 2005. Studying complex adaptive systems, in *Jrl Syst Sci & Complexity* (2006) 19: 1–8.

Holler, Judith, Shovelton Heather, Beattie Geoffrey. 2009. Do Iconic Hand Gestures Really Contribute to the Communication of Semantic Information in a Face-to-Face Context? *Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour* 33: 73–88.

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elisabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (dirs.). *Approaches to grammaticalization*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 17–35.

Hüning, Matthias. 2009. Semantic niches and analogy in word formation: Evidence from contrastive linguistics. *Languages in Contrast* 9 (2): 183–201.

Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij. 2014. From compounding to derivation: The rise of derivational affixes through constructionalization. In Ferdinand von Mengden & Horst Simon (dirs.). *Folia Linguistica* 48 (2). 579–604.

Hüning, Matthias. 2018. Foreign word formation in construction morphology: Verbs in -ieren in German. In Geert. Booij (dir.). *The construction of words: advances in construction morphology*, Cham: Springer: 341-372.

Hutchins, Sharon Suzanne. 1998. *The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English honestthemes*. Atlanta, GA: Emory University dissertation.

Hugou, Vincent. 2013. *Productivité et émergence du sens. L’exemple de la construction (all) X-ed out dans un corpus de blogs et de forums de discussion*. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 3.

Hyungsuk Ji. 2004. Étude d'un modèle computationnel pour la représentation du sens des mots par intégration des relations de contexte. Thèse de doctorat. Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble.

Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 2015; 1(1): 69–77.

Jackendoff, Ray & Audring, Jenny. 2016. Morphological schemas. *The Mental Lexicon* 11:3 (2016), 467–493.

Jackendoff, Ray & Audring, Jenny. 2019. *The Texture of the Lexicon: Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, Ray & Audring, Jenny. 2020. Relational morphology: a cousin of Construction grammar. In *Frontiers in Psychology*, vol 11: 1-12.

Jacquemet, M. 2014. Metapragmatics: Gumperz's legacy in the study of language and power. *Langage et société*, 150, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.150.0055

Jacquet Guillaume, Manguin Jean-Luc, Venant Fabienne, & Victorri Bernard. 2010. Construction dynamique du sens : application à la prédication verbale. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00526804/document

Jakobson, Roman. 1965. "À la recherche de l'essence du langage". *Diogènes* 51, 22-38.

Jakobson, Roman. 1988 [1942]. « Six leçons sur le son et le sens ». *Selected Writings VIII 1976-1980*. Berlin & New York : Mouton de Gruyter.

Jamet, Denis & Jobert, Manuel. 2013. *Aspects of linguistic impoliteness*. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Jansegers, Marlies & Gries, Stefan Th. 2020 Towards a dynamic behavioral profile: A diachronic study of polysemous sentir in Spanish, *Corpus Linguistics and Ling. Theory* 16(1): 145-187.
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8513097

Jespersen, Otto. 1922. *Language — Its Nature, Development and Origin*. London: Allen & Unwin. (Repr. 1950.)

Jespersen, Otto. 2006 [1933]. *Essentials of English Grammar*. London: Routledge.

Jespersen, Otto. (1909–49). *A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles*. Vol.i (1909), ii (1914), iii (1927), iv (1931), v (1940), vi (1942), vii (1949). Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard. (Repr. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.)

Jobert Manuel. 2013. Domestic and Professional Impoliteness in *Fawly Towers: Impoliteness as a Dramatic Device*. In Denis Jamet & Manuel Jobert (dir.), *Aspects of linguistic impoliteness*. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars: 75-93.

Joo, Jungseock, Francis Steen, & Mark Turner. 2017. "*Red Hen Lab: Dataset and Tools for Multimodal Human Communication Research.*" *KI - Künstliche Intelligenz*. Springer. Special edition edited by Mehul Bhatt & Kristian Kersting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-017-0505-9. Print ISSN 0933-1875. Online ISSN1610-1987.

Joseph, John E. 2000. *Limiting the arbitrary: Linguistic Naturalism and its Opposites in Plato's Cratylus and Modern Theories of Language*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Joseph, Brian D. 1997. On the linguistics of marginality: the centrality of the periphery. In Singer Kora, Eggert Randall & Anderson Gregory (dirs.) *Papers from the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago; Chicago Linguistic Society*. 199-213 https://www.asc.ohio-state.edu/joseph.1/publications/1997onth.pdf accès 24/05/2020

Joseph, Brian D. 1997. On the Iconic Elements in Etymological Investigation. In *Diachronica* 4(1): 1-26.

Joseph, Brian D. 2001. Diachronic Morphology. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (dirs.), *The Handbook of Morphology*. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online: 349-373.

Joseph, Brian D. 2013. On phonically conditioned analogy. *OSUWPL Volume 60*: 11-20.

Joseph, Brian D & Janda, Richard. 2003. *The Handbook of Historical Linguistics*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jurado, Alejandro Barrena. 2019. A study on the 'wordgasm': the nature of blends' splinters. *Lexis* 14. Consulté le 9 juin 2020. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/3916; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.3916.

Kappelhoff, Hermann, & Mühler Cornelia. 2011. Embodied meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. *Metaphor and the Social World* 1:2 (2011), 121–153.

Kay, Christian. 2015. Words and Thesauri. In John R. Taylor (dir.). *The Oxford handbook of the Word*. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Kay, Christian & Allan, Kathryn. 2016. Change in the English Lexicon. In Merjä Kyto (dir.). *The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University press: 220-236.
Kay Paul and Fillmore Charles. 1999. Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X Doing Y? Construction. In *Language*, Vol. 75:1, 1-33.

Kilgarriff, Adam. 1997. 'I don't believe in word senses'. Computers and the Humanities, 31(2): 91–113.
http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/1997-K-CHum-believe.pdf

Kilgarriff, Adam. 2004. How dominant is the commonest sense of a word? In Petr Sojka, Ivan Kopecek & Karel Pala (dir.). TSD 2004, LNAI 2448. Berlin Heidelberg Springer Verlag : 1–9.
http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/2004-K-TSD-CommonestSense.pdf

Kilgarriff, Adam. 2015. How Many Words Are There? In John R. Taylor (dir.). *The Oxford handbook of the Word*. Oxford : Oxford University Press : 1-9.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa Vít, Bušta Jan, Jakubíček Miloš, Kovář Vojtěch, Michelfeit Jan, Rychlý Pavel, Suchomel Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: ten years on. *Lexicography*, 1: 7-36.

Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychlý Pavel, Smrž Pavel, Tugwell David. 2004. The sketch engine. *Information Technology*. Proc Euralex, Lorient, France.

Kleiber, Georges. 2006. Sémiotique de l'interjection. *Langages* 161: 10-23.

Koch, Peter. 1999a. Tree and fruit. A cognitive-onomasiological approach. *Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata* 28(2): 331–347.

Koch, Peter. 1999b. Frame and Contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In Günther Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (dirs.). *Metonymy in Language and Thought*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 139-169.

Koch, Peter. 2001. Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In Martin Haspelmath, Eckehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (dirs.). *Language typology and language universals. An international handbook*, vol. 2. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter: 1142–1178.

Koch, Peter. 2012. The Pervasiveness of Contiguity and metonymy in Language change. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna Robinson (dirs.). *Current Methods in Historical Semantics*. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter: 259-312.

Koch, Peter. 2014. Between Word Formation and semantic change. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützsky, & Wolfgang Dressler (dirs.). *Morphology and meaning*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 71-96.

Koch, Peter. 2016. Meaning change and semantic shifts. In Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (dirs.). *The lexical typology of semantic shifts*. Berlin/ Boston: de Gruyter: 21-66.

Koch, Peter & Marzo, Daniela. 2007. A two-dimensional approach to the study of motivation in lexical typology and its first application to French high-frequency vocabulary*. *Studies in Language* vol 31, issue 2: 259-291.

Köhler, Wolfgang 1929. *Gestalt Psychology*. New York: Liveright.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2016. The lexical typology of semantic shifts: an introduction. In Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (dirs.). *The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts*. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 1-20.

Kövecses Zoltan & Radden Günther. 1998. Metonymy, Developing a Cognitive Linguistic view. In *Cognitive Linguistics*, Volume 9, Issue 1: 37-78.
Kövecses Zoltan. 2020. *Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kwon, Nahyun & Round, Erich R. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. *Morphology* 25: 1–27.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Cognitive models and prototype theory. In Ulric Neisser (dir.), *Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization*. Cambridge University Press: 63–100.

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. 2016. Metaphor in Linguistic Thought and Theory. *Cognitive Semantics* 2 (2016): 3–29.

Langacker, Ronald W. 2018. Morphology in Cognitive Grammar. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

L arrivée, Pierre. 2002. Invariants sémantiques et constructions syntaxiques. *Travaux de linguistique* 45 : 67–92.

L arrivée, Pierre. 2008. Une histoire du sens. Panorama de la sémantique linguistique depuis Bréal. Bruxelles : Peter Lang.

Lawler, John M. 1990. Women, Men, and Bristly Things: The Phonosemantics of the BR–Assonance in English. In P. Beddor (dir.). *Michigan Working Papers in Linguistics* 1:1. http://websites.umich.edu/~jlawler/WomenMen&BristlyThings.pdf

Lebaud Daniel, Ploog Katja. 2018. Paraphrases, reformulations et gloses : points de vues linguistiques. In *Le déploiement du sens : actualité des commentaires anciens à la poésie grecque*. Besançon : Institut des Sciences et Techniques de l'Antiquité : 17-36. (Collection « ISTA », 1447)

Lechecka, Thomas. 2015. Collocation and colligation, *Handbook of Pragmatics*.

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1996. Identifying and Interpreting Blends: an experimental approach. *Cognitive Linguistics* 7 4: 359-390.

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1998. Scapes, Holics, and Thons: The Semantics of English Combining Forms. *American Speech*, Vol. 73/1 : 3-28.

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2000. Are affixes signs? The semantic relationships of English derivational affixes. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E Pfeiffer, Marus Pöchtrager, & John R Rennison. (dirs.). *Morphological analysis in comparison*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 143-154.

Lehrer, Adrienne. 2007. Blendalicious. In Judith Munat (dir.). *Lexical creativity, texts and contexts*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 115-133.

Liberman, Anatoly. 2008. *An Analytic dictionary of English Etymology*. Minneapolis/ London: University of Minnesota Press.

Liberman, Anatoly. 2010a. Iconicity and Etymology. *Signergy, Iconicity in language and literature* 9, John Benjamins: 243–258.

Liberman, Anatoly. 2010b. The State of English Etymology (A Few Personal Observations). In RobertA. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm, William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. (dirs.). *Studies in the History of the English Language V Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches*, de Gruyter: 161-182.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. *On the organisation of the lexicon*. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. *Morphology and Lexical Semantics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lieber, Rochelle. 2019. Theoretical issues in word formation. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 34–55.

Lipka, Leonhard. 1992. *An outline of English lexicology. Lexical structure, Word Semantics, Word Formation*. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Longrée Dominique, Mellet Sylvie. 2012. Le motif : une unité phraséologique englobante ? Étendre le champ de la phraséologie de la langue au discours. In *Langages, Vers une extension du domaine de la phraséologie : Armand Colin 1 (189) : 65-79*.

López-Couso, María José. 2016. Continuing the dialogue between corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Three case studies. *Corpus Linguistics and Ling. Theory* 2016; 12(1): 7–29.

Lorenz, David. 2020. Converging variations and the emergence of horizontal links. *To-contraction in American English*. In Lotte Smirnova & Elena Sommerer (dirs.). *Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 244–274.

Malkiel, Yakov. 1990. *Diachronic problems in phonosymbolism*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Malkiel, Yakov. 1993. *Etymology*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marchand, Hans. 1960. *The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach*. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Marti Solano Ramon. 2011. Phraseological Units in English: variation through lexical insertion. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata. ffhal-01645058

Marti Solano Ramon. 2013. From Idiom Variants to Open-Slot Idioms: Close-Ended and Open-Ended Variational Paradigms. *Research on Phraseology across Continents, Vol. II, University of Bialystok Publishing House: 167-183*.

Masini, Francesca & Audring, Jenny. 2019. Construction morphology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 365–389.

Mattiello, Elisa. 2008. *An Introduction to English Slang: A Description of its Morphology, Semantics and Sociology*. Milan: Polimetrica.

Mattiello, Elisa. 2013. *Extragrammatical morphology in English. Abbreviations, blends, reduplicative and related phenomena*. De Gruyer.

Mattiello, Elisa. 2017. *Analogy in Word formation. A study of English neologisms and occasionalisms*. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

Martinet, André, 1999. Le synthème. *La Linguistique*, vol. 35/2 : 11-16.

Mel'čuk, Igor, Clas André & Polguère Alain. 1995. *Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire*. Louvain la Neuve : Duculot.

Mey, Jacob. 2016. Why We Need the Pragmeme, or: Speech Acting and Its Peripeties. In Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, Istvan Kecskes (dir.). *Pragmeme and Theories of Language Use*. Springer: 133-140.
Michaelis, Laura A., & Feng, Hanbing. 2015. What is this, sarcastic syntax? *Constructions and Frames*, 7: 148–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.7.2.01mic

Michel, Sascha. 2015. Folk Etymology. In Peter O Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, Franz Rainer (dirs.). *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Semantics and pragmatics in word-formation I: General aspects*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 1002-1019.

Miller, Gary D. 2010. *Language Change*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miller, Gary D. 2014. *English Lexicogenesis*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Monneret, Philippe. 2003. *Le sens du signifiant. Implications linguistiques et cognitives de la motivation*. Paris : Champion.

Monneret, Philippe. 2004. *Essais de linguistique analogique*. Dijon : ABELL.

Monneret, Philippe. 2007. L'analogie et l'énigme de l'expression. In *L'Information Grammaticale*, N. 113 : 16-22.

Monneret, Philippe. 2011. Motivation et analogie. Enjeux de la similarité en sciences du langage. *Philologia*, Cluj Napoca (Roumanie), 56 : 27-38. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/1037900/filename/Motivation et analogie.pdf

Monneret, Philippe. 2014. L'iconicité comme problème analogique. *Le Français Moderne*, 1 : 46-77.

Monneret, Philippe. 2018. Fonction argumentative et fonction figurale de l'analogie : quelle relation entre l'argument par analogie et l'argument par métaphore ? *Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF 2018, SHS Web of Conferences* 46, 01015 (2018).

Monneret, Philippe. 2019a. Les limites de l'interprétation à la lumière de l'analogie. In *Guy Achard-Bayle, Maximilien Guérin, Georges Kleiber & Marina Krylyschin (dirs.). Les sciences du langage et la question de l'interprétation (aujourd'hui)*. Limoges : Editions Lambert-Lucas : 171-195.

Monneret, Philippe. 2019b. Le symbolisme phonétique et la fonction iconique de l'analogie. *Signifiances/Signifying*: 1-19.

Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan, & Rainer, Franz. 2015. *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe*. Vols 1-5. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Murphy, Lynne. 2003. *Semantic relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other Paradigms*. Cambridge University Press.

Murphy, Lynne. 2010. *Lexical meaning*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Partingdon, Allan. 2014. Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. *International Journal of Corpus Linguistics* 19:1 (2014). 118–146.

Narrog, Heiko. 2016. Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Daniël Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesquière (dirs.). *Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)Subjectification and Directionality (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs)* 305: 19-46.

Roberto Navigli, Michele Bevilacqua, Simone Conia, Dario Montagnini & Francesco Cecconi.2021. Ten Years of Babelnet. A Survey. *Proc. of IJCAI 2021: 4559-4567*. Consulté le 4/11/ 2021. https://www.diag.uniroma1.it/navigli/pubs/IJCAI_2021_Naviglietal.pdf.
Nelson, Robert. 2018. How 'chunky' is language? Some estimates based on Sinclair's Idiom Principle. *Corpora* Vol. 13 (3): 431–460.

Némo, François. 2014. Plurisémie, intégration sémantique, sous-détermination ; rendre compte des sens multiples en emploi. *Etudes romanes de Brno* 35, 1: 41-57.

Nobile, Luca. 2019. Introduction : Le symbolisme phonétique à l'âge de l'oralité numérique. Une perspective sur le langage par-delà 'nature' et 'culture'. *Signifying/Signifiances* 3(1): I-XXXV.

Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. *Functions of Language* 14(2): 177-202.

Nöth, Winfried. 2008. Semiotic foundations of natural linguistics and diagrammatic iconicity. In Klaas Willem & Ludovic De Cuypere (dirs.). *Naturalness and Iconicity in Language*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 73-100.

Oakes, Michael P. 2020. Statistical significance for measures of collocation strength (WP3). In Gloria Corpas Pastor & Jean-Pierre Colson (dirs.). *Computational Phraseology*, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 189-206.

Otis, Katya, & Sagi, Eyal 2008. *Phonesthemes: A corpus-based analysis.* *Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society* 30(30): 65-70.

Overstreet, Maryann. 2010. Metapragmatics. In Louise Cummings (dir.). *The pragmatics encyclopedia*. New York: Routledge: 266–268.

Palmer, Abram S. 1882. *Folk Etymology: A Dictionary of Verbal Corruptions of Words Perverted in Form or Meaning by False Derivation of Mistaken Analogy*. London: Bell.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Radden, Günther. 2004. *Studies in linguistic motivation*. De Gruyter Mouton.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2005. The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In Ruiz de Mendoza et Pena Cervel (dirs.). *Cognitive Linguistics Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction*. Berlin ; de Gruyter : 353-386.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2013. Motivation in language. In Shulamith Kreitler (dir). *Cognition and Motivation: Forging an Interdisciplinary Perspective*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 407-432.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe, & Radden, Günther. 2011. *Motivation in grammar and the lexicon*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Parvaresh, Vahid. 2016. Metapragmatic Pragmemes. In Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, Istvan Kecskes (dirs.). *Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use*. Cham: Springer : 521-536.

Peeters, Bert. 2003. Le transculturel : Sémantique, Pragmatique, Axiologie. *La linguistique*, 39: 119-135.

Peeters, Bert (dir.). 2006. *Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical Evidence from the Romance Languages*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931-1935. *Collected Papers*, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Pentangelo, Joseph. 2020. *Phonesthetics and the etymologies of *blood* and *bone*.*
<https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics/article/phonesthetics-and-the-etymologies-of-blood-and-bone/0535FCEF366954322449B824CD68BE36
Perek, Florent. 2016. Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: a case study. *Linguistics* 54:149–88.

Perek, Florent. & Patten, Amanda. 2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. *International Journal of Corpus Linguistics*, 24(3), 354–384.

Perniss, Pamela, Fischer, Olga & Ljungberg, Christina. 2020. *Operationalizing Iconicity*. John Benjamins.

Philps, Dennis. 2001. "<CN-> as a Phonesthemic Metaoperator : an Introductory Note". In: *Anglophonia/Caliban*, n°9. Langues et Littératures. Linguistique, stylistique, traduction : 113-117. doi : https://doi.org/10.3406/calib.2001.1417

Philps, Dennis. 2002. Le concept de 'marqueur sub-lexical' et la notion d'invariant sémantique. In Pierre Larrivée (dir.). *La notion d'invariant sémantique. Travaux de linguistique* 45 : 103-123.

Philps, Dennis. 2012. Submorphemes: backtracking from English 'kn- words' to the emergence of the linguistic sign, *Miranda* 7. Consulté le 17 janvier 2022 [http://miranda.revues.org/4244](http://miranda.revues.org/4244)

Pillière, Linda. 2013. *Dr. House* and the Language of Offence. In Denis Jamet & Manuel Jobert (dir.). *Aspects of linguistic impoliteness*. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars: 60-74.

Pleyer, Michael, Hartmann, Stefan, Winters, James, & Zlatev, Jordan. 2017. Interaction and Iconicity in the evolution of language. *Interaction Studies* 18:3. John Benjamins : 303–313.

Polguère, Alain. 2007. Soleil insoutenable et chaleur de plomb : le statut linguistique des greffes collocationnelles. [http://olst.ling.umontreal.ca/pdf/GreffesColloc2007.pdf](http://olst.ling.umontreal.ca/pdf/GreffesColloc2007.pdf) Consulté le 9 février 2022.

Polguère, Alain. 2011. Perspective épistémologique sur l'approche linguistique Sens-Texte, *Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris*, XX : 79-114.

Polguère, Alain. 2016a. La question de la géométrie du lexique. SHS Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences. *Actes du 5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française* 27 : 1-35.

Polguère, Alain. 2016b. *Lexicologie et sémantique lexicale : notions fondamentales*. Montréal : Les presses de l'université de Montréal.

Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, Luschützsky, Hans Christian, & Dressler, Wolfgang. 2014. Morphology and meaning: an overview. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützsky, & Wolfgang Dressler (dirs.). *Morphology and meaning*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 3-48.

Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, Dressler, Wolfgang & Luschützsky, Hans Christian. 2019. *Competition in inflection and word formation*. Cham: Springer.

Rajiv, Rao. 2013. Prosodic Consequences of Sarcasm Versus Sincerity in Mexican Spanish. *Concentric: Studies in Linguistics* 39.2: 33-59.

Ramachandran, Vilayanur S.; Hubbard, E. M. 2001. Synaesthesia — a window into perception, thought and language. *Journal of Consciousness Studies* 8: 3–34.

Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Hovav. 2001. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. In Andrew Spencer, Arnold M. Zwicky (dirs.) *The Handbook of Morphology*: 248-271.

Raskin, Victor. 2015. Funny Words: Verbal Humour. In John R. Taylor. *The Oxford Handbook of the Word*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rastier, François. 1987. *Sémantique interprétative*. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
Riemer, Nick. 2015. Introduction: Semantics – a theory in search of an object. In Nick Riemer (dir.). *The Routledge Handbook of Semantics*. London & New York: Routledge: 1-10.

Reay, IE. 2009 [1994]. Sound Symbolism. In Keith Allan (dir.). *Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics*. Oxford: Elsevier: 893-901.

Renner, Vincent. 2020. An ecosystem view of English word formation. *The Mental Lexicon* 15:1: 4–20.

Rettig, W. 1981. *Sprachliche Motivation. Zeichenrelationen von Lautform und Bedeutung am Beispiel französischer Lexikoneinheiten*. Frankfurt a. M./Bern: Lang.

Robert, Stéphane. 2003. L'épaisseur du langage et la linéarité de l'énoncé : Vers un modèle énonciatif de production. In A. Ouattara (dir.). *Parcours énonciatifs et parcours interprétatifs – Théories et applications*. Paris : Ophrys : 255-274.

Robert, Stéphane. 2008. Words and their meanings: Principles of variation and stabilization. In Martine Vanhove (dir.). *From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations*. Amsterdam/ Phildelphia: John Benjamins : 55 – 92.

Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 2015. "Word creation". In Peter O Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (dirs.), *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe*, Chapt 26. Berlin: De Gruyter: 485-500.

Rosch Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara B. (eds), *Cognition and categorization*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum : 27-48.

Sablayrolles Jean-François. 2021. « La vie des mots n'est pas un long fleuve tranquille », *Linx*, 82. Last access 18 12 2021. http://journals.openedition.org/linx/8020 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.8020

Saussure, Ferdinand. (de) (1995) [1916]. *Cours de linguistique générale*. Ed. critique de Tullio de Mauro. P.U.F : Paris.

Sonesson, Goran. 2019. Elements of Peircean phenomenology: From Categories to Signs by way of Grounds. In *Semiotica*, vol 2019, Issue 228.: 259-285. https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/2019/228/article-p259.xml

Sadowski, Piotr. 2001. The sound as an echo to the sense: The iconicity of English gl- words. In Olga Fischer et M. Nanny (dir.). *The Motivated Sign* [Iconicity in Language and Literature 2]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 69-88.

Sadowski, Piotr. 2009. *From interaction to symbol*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Shardakova, Maria. 2017. Politeness, Teasing, and Humor. In Salvatore Attardo (dir.). *The Routledge Handbook of Humor*. Routledge. 2019-233.

Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen. Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Unpublished dissertation. University of Leuven.

Schoonjans, Steven. 2018. *Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen*. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110566260

Schoonjans, Steven. 2017. Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues. *Linguistics Vanguard*: 1-8.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. The scope of word-formation research. In Peter O Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (dirs.). *Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe*. Word Formation as a linguistic discipline. Berlin: De Gruyter: 1-21.

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. *The Dynamics of the Linguistic System Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shmelev, Alexei. 2016. Semantic shifts as sources of enantiosemy. In Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (dirs.). *The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts*. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 67-94.

Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. *Language and Communication*, 23(3-4): 193-229.

Simmons Elizabeth Schoen & Magnuson James S. 2018. Word length, proportion of overlap, and phonological competition in spoken word recognition. In Chuck Kalsh Martina Rau, Jerry Zhu & T. Rogers (dirs.). CogSci : 1062-1967.

Simpson, John, Weiner Edmund & Durkin, Philip. 2003. The Oxford English Dictionary today. *Transactions of the Philological Society* Volume 102:3 (2004): 335-381.

Sinclair, John M. 1991. *Corpus, concordance, collocation*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, John M. 2004. *Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse*. London: Routledge.

Sommerer Lotte. 2020. Constructionalization, constructional competition and constructional death
Investigating the demise of Old English POSS DEM constructions. In Lotte Smirnova & Elena Sommerer
(dirs..). *Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John
Benjamins: 60-103.

Southern, Mark. 2000. 'Formulaic Binomials, Morphosymbolism, and Behagel's Law: The Grammatical Status of Expressive Iconicity'. *American Journal of Germanic Linguistics & Literatures* 12: 251-79.

Smith, Chris A. 2014. The phonesthetics of blends: A lexicographic study of cognitive blends in the OED. De Gruyter 2(1):12-45.

Smith, Chris A. 2016. Tracking semantic change in fl- monomorphemes in the OED. *Journal of Historical Linguistics* 6(2): 165-200.

Smith, Chris A. 2018. Where do new words like boobage, flamage, ownage come from? Tracking the history of -age words from 1100 to 2000 in the OED3. *Lexis* 12. Consulté le 06 mars 2021. http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/2167 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.2167

Smith, Chris A. 2019. Approche cognitive diachronique de l'émergence du honesthème fl- : réanalyse phonosymbolique et transmodalité dans le Oxford English Dictionary. *Signifiances/ Signifying* 3(1) : 36-62.

Smith, Chris A. 2020a. A Case Study of *-some* and *-able* derivatives in the OED3: Examining the Diachronic Output and Productivity of Two Competing Adjectival Suffixes. *Lexis* 16., Consulté le 31 décembre 2020. http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4793; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.4793

Smith, Chris A. 2020b. Le projet MultiDES : premières réflexions sur la synonymie et étude de cas de synonymie translangue. *Syntaxe et Sémantique 21 : Synonymie, polysémie et questions de sémantique lexicale*. Presses Universitaires de Caen : 55-86.
Smith, Chris A. & Vigneron-Bosbach, Jeanne. 2020. Introduction. In Chris A Smith & Jeanne Vigneron-Bosbach (dirs.). *Syntaxe et Sémantique 21 : Synonymie, polysémie et questions de sémantique lexicale*. Presses Universitaires de Caen : 11-38.

Smith, Chris A. 2021. Approche constructionnelle de l'émergence d'expressions de l'insolence en anglais. *Cahiers de lexicologie* : 119 : 235-264.

Sommerer Lotte & Smirnova Elena. 2020. *Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia : John Benjamins.

Sorell, Joseph. 2015. Word Frequencies. In John R. Taylor (dir.). *The Oxford handbook of the Word*. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Speer Robyn, Chin Joshua, & Havasi Catherine. 2017. Concept Net 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge. In *Proceedings of AAAI 31*. Consulté le 4/ 11/ 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03975

Spence, Charles & Deroy, Ophelia. 2013. "How automatic are crossmodal correspondences?". *Consciousness and Cognition* 22(1) : 245-260.

Spitzer, Leo. 1952. Confusion Schmooshun. *The Journal of English and Germanic Philology*, Vol. 51, No. 2: 226-233.

Stange, Ulrike. 2016. Emotive Interjections in British English A corpus-based study on variation in acquisition, function and usage. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Steen, Francis and Turner, Mark B. 2013. Multimodal Construction Gramma. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier, & Jennifer Hinnell (dirs.). *Language and the Creative Mind*. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 2013. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2168035 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2168035

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2002. *Sound symbolism in usage-driven model*. Rice University [unpublished MS].

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional Analysis. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of Construction grammar*. Oxford: Oxford University Press:

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Flach Susanne. 2016. A corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (dir.). *Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge*. Berlin: De Gruyter: 101–127.

Štekauer, Pavol. 1998. *An onomasiological theory of English word-formation*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Steyer, Kathrin. 2015. Patterns. Phraseology in a state of flux. *International Journal of Lexicography*, Vol. 28/ 3: 279–29.

Strauss, Udo, Grzybek, Peter, Altmann Gabriel. Word Length and Word Frequency. 2007. In Peter Grzybek (dir.). *Contributions to the Science of Text and Language: Word Length Studies and Related Issues (Text, Speech and Language Technology)* : 277-294.

Tacho, Elisabeth. 2010. Lexical restructuring by borrowing in ME. In Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. (dirs.). *Studies in the History of the English Language V Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches*. de Gruyter: 231-256.

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. *Toward a Cognitive Semantics* (I & II). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Taslimipoor Shiva, Pastor Gloria Corpas & Rohanian Omid. 2020. Detecting semantic difference: A new model based on knowledge and collocational association. In Gloria Corpas Pastor & Jean-Pierre Colson (dirs.). *Computational Phraseology*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 311-324.

Taylor, John R. 2016. Lexical semantics. In Barbara Dancygier (dir.). *The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 246-261.

Tichý, Ondřej. 2018. Lexical obsolescence and loss in English: 1700–2000. In Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö (dirs.). *Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics*. John Benjamins: 81-103.

Thompson, Arthur Lewis & Do, Youngah. 2019. Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. *Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics*, 4(1), 72: 1-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.872

Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James A. 2009. The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. *Language* 85: 321–354.

Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 1982. From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In: W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (dirs.). *Perspectives on Historical Linguistics*. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins: 245-271

Traugott, Elisabeth. Closs, & Trousdale, G. 2010. Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization how do they intersect? In Elisabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (dirs.), *Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization* (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins [https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.04tra](https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.04tra)

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2015. Towards a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (dirs.). *Diachronic Construction Grammar*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 51-80.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2018. Modeling language change with constructional networks. In Salvador Pons Borderla & Óscar Loureda (dirs.). *Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers*. Leiden: Brill: 17-50.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2019. Constructional pattern-development in language change. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Moehlig-Falke (dirs.). *Patterns in Language and Linguistic*. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 125-156.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. *Regularity in Semantic Change*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. *Constructionalization and constructional changes*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. Contentful constructionalisation, *Journal of Historical Linguistics* 4:2: 256–283.

Tsur, Reuven. 2006. Size sound symbolism revisited. *Journal of Pragmatics* 38: 905–924.

Tsur, Reuven. 2017. *Poetic conventions as cognitive fossils*. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tsur, Reuven & Gafni, Chen. 2019. Phonetic symbolism: double edgedness and code-switching. *Literary Universals Project*. https://literaryuniversals.uconn.edu/2019/07/20/phonetic-symbolism-double-edgedness-and-aspectswitching/ Consulté le 6 novembre 2021.
Tournier, Jean. 1985. *Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l'anglais contemporain*. Paris/Genève: Champion & Slatkine.

Tuggy, David. 2007. Schematicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 82-115.

Turner, Mark. 2015. Blending in language and communication. In Ewa Dabrowska & Dagmar Divjak (dirs.). *Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics*. De Gruyter Mouton: 211-232.

Turner, Mark. 2018. The Role of Creativity in Multimodal Construction Grammar. In *Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik*, 66: 3: 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0030.

Turney, P. D. & Pantel, P. 2010. From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics, *Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research*, 37: 141–88.

Umbreit, Birgit. 2010. Does *love* come from *to love* or *to love* from *love*? Why lexical motivation has to be regarded as bidirectional. In Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (dirs.). *Cognitive perspectives on word formation*. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter: 301-334.

Umbreit, Birgit. 2011. Motivational Networks: an empirically supported cognitive phenomenon. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (dirs.). *Motivation in grammar and the lexicon*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 269-286.

Ungerer, Friedrich. 2007. Word formation. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (dirs.). *The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics*. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 650-676.

Van Marle, Jaap. 1990. Rule-creating creativity: analogy and a synchronic morphological process. In Wolfgang U., Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E Pfeiffer, & John R Rennison (dirs.). *Contemporary Morphology*. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter: 267-274.

Van Peteghem, Marleen. 2018. Les structures de la douleur : sur le marquage de l'expérienceur dans les langues romanes. In Nelly Flaux, P. Haas, V. Mostrov, K. Paykin, & F. Tayalati (dirs.). *De la passion du sens en linguistique : hommages à Danièle Van de Velde*. Valenciennes : Presses universitaires de Valenciennes : 439-463.

Van de Velde, Freek, de Smet Hendrik & Ghesquière Lobke. 2015. Introduction: On multiple source constructions in language change. In Hendrik de Smet, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (dirs.). *On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change*. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-17.

van Trijp Remi et Luc Steels. 2012. Multilevel Alignment Maintains Language Systematicity. *Advances in Complex Systems*, 15(3-4)

Victorri, Bernard. 2008. Chapitre 7 : le connexionisme. In Francis Eustache, Bernard Lechevalier, Fausto Viader (dirs.). *Traité de neuropsychologie clinique*. De Boeck Supérieur : 53 – 64. Consulté le 10/10/2021 https://www.cairn.info/traite-de-neuropsychologie-clinique---page-53.htm

Voronin, Stanislas. V. 2006. *Osnovy fonosemantiki* [The Fundamentals of Phonosemantics]. Lenand, Moscow, RUS.

Warren, Beatrice. 1990. On the importance of combining forms. In Wolfgang U., Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E Pfeiffer, & John R Rennison (dirs.). *Contemporary Morphology*. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter: 111-132.
Waugh, Linda R. 1979. The Sound Shape of language. *Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium*, Vol 5 Issue 1: 198-215.

Waugh, Linda R. 1993. Les degrés d'iconicité diagrammatique dans le lexique. *Faits de Langue* : 227-234.

Waugh, Linda R. 1994. Degrees of Iconicity in the Lexicon. *Journal of Pragmatics* 22: 55-70.

Whissel, Cynthia. 1999. Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of speech sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. *Perceptual and Motor Skills* 89(1): 19-48.

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1995. Emotion and facial expression: A semantic perspective. *Culture and Psychology*, 1: 227-258.

Wierzbicka Anna. 2007. Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. *Language Sciences*, 29: 14-65.

Willem, Klaas & De Cuypere, Ludovic 2008. *Naturalness and Iconicity in Language*. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber Dan. 1992. On verbal irony. *Lingua* 87: 53-76.

Wilson, Deirdre, & Sperber, Dan. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. *Lingua* 90: 1-25.

Wilson Deirdre & Sperber Dan. 2004. *Relevance Theory*. In Laurence R. Horn et Gregory Ward (dirs.), *The Handbook of Pragmatics*. Oxford: Blackwell, 607-632.

Wimmer, Gejza, Köhler Reinhard, Grotjahn Rüdiger & Altmann Gabriel. 1994. Towards a theory of word length distribution. *Journal of Quantitative Linguistics*, 1:1: 98-106,

Winter, Bodo. 2019. *Sensory Linguistics Language Metaphor and Perception*. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia; John Benjamins.

Winters Margaret E. 2015. Lexical Layers. In John R. Taylor (dir.). *The Oxford handbook of the Word*. Oxford :
Oxford University Press.

Wray, Alison. 2002. *Formulaic Language and the Lexicon*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wray, Alison. 2017. Formulaic Sequences as a Regulatory Mechanism for Cognitive Perturbations During the Achievement of Social Goals. *Topics in Cognitive Science* (2017) 1–19.

Wright, David. 2012. Scrunch, growze, or chobble?: investigating regional variation in sound symbolism in the Survey of English Dialects. *University of Leeds* 17. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13712/1/221231_PubSub2850_Wright_D.pdf Consulté le 6 novembre 2021.

Yavorska, Galina & Zymovets, Galyna. 2016. Motivational scenarios and semantic frames for social relations in the Slavic languages – friends, enemies, and others. In Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (dirs.). *The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts*. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 335–353.

Yus Ramos, Francisco. 1998. Relevance theory and media discourse. A verbal-visual model of communication. *Poetics* 25 (1998) : 293-309.

Zalizniak, Anna A. 2018. The Catalogue of Semantic Shifts: 20 Years Later. *Russian Journal of Linguistics*. Vol. 22 No. 4: 770–787.
Ziem, Alexander. 2017. Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar? *Linguistics Vanguard*: 1-9.

Zima, Elisabeth. 2017. On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. *Linguistics Vanguard* 2017; 3(s1): 1-12.

Zlatev, Jordan. 2016. Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology. *Cognitive linguistics*: 1-14.

Zlatev, Jordan, Sune Vork Steffensen, Matthew Isaac Harvey et Michael Kimmel. 2018. Introduction to "Meaning making: Enactive, participatory, interactive, symbolic". *Cognitive Semiotics* 11(2): 1-6.