MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR PARENTAGE ANALYSIS IN THE GROOPER F1 HYBRID
EPINEPHELUS COIOIDES × EPINEPHELUS LANCEOLATUS (ACTINOPTERYGII:
PERCIFORMES: SERRANIDAE)

Lee M. LIM <fnref n="1" />, Shigeharu SENOO <fnref n="2" />, Shafiquzzaman SIDDIQUEE <fnref n="1" />,
and Kenneth F. RODRIGUES <fnref n="1" />*

Lim L.M., Senoo S., Siddiquee S., Rodrigues K.F. 2014. Molecular markers for parentage analysis in the grouper F1 hybrid *Epinephelus coioides* × *Epinephelus lanceolatus* (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Serranidae). Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 44 (1): 59–64.

**Background.** The aquaculture industry is driven by the need to develop novel interspecific hybrids with improved culture characteristics, however currently no molecular markers are available for the validation of F1 hybrids in the case of groupers. The presently reported study was directed toward the development of molecular markers for F1 hybrids obtained by artificial spawning of eggs derived from orange-spotted grouper, *Epinephelus coioides* (Hamilton, 1822), with sperm from giant grouper, *E. lanceolatus* (Bloch, 1790).

**Materials and methods.** DNA was extracted and purified from the fin clip of a single F1 hybrid of *E. coioides* × *E. lanceolatus*. Small insert shotgun genomics libraries were constructed, 40 positive transformants were sequenced, and the sequences deposited at the GenBank. Thirty locus-specific primer pairs were designed and tested across 64 F1 hybrid specimens as well as DNA samples extracted from coral grouper, *Epinephelus corallicola* (Valenciennes, 1828), and brown-marbled grouper, *E. fuscoguttatus* (Forsskål, 1775).

**Results.** A panel of thirty molecular markers was developed to verify parentage, of these eleven and six of the markers were inherited from the sire and dam respectively. Two markers were specific to the F1 hybrid and none of the markers could be assigned to the closely related groupers *E. corallificola* and *E. fuscoguttatus*.

**Conclusion.** The markers developed can be applied to assign parentage and determine the degree of introgression in interspecific grouper hybrids developed from *E. coioides* and *E. lanceolatus*. The methods developed in this study can be extended to characterize Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) and to identify interspecific F1 hybrids in the wild.

**Keywords:** Mendelian inheritance, heterosis, Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibility, single locus DNA markers, genomic library

INTRODUCTION

The aquaculture industry is increasingly turning
towards the cultivation of interspecific grouper hybrids,
which have been reported to exhibit higher growth rates
and resistance to disease, characteristics which are likely
to be the result of heterosis. Grouper hybrids have been
documented in the case of goldblotch grouper,
*Epinephelus costae* (Steindachner, 1878) × dusky
grouper, *E. marginatus* (Lowe, 1834) (see Glamuzina et
al. 2001); brown-marbled grouper, *E. fuscoguttatus*
(Forsskål, 1775) × camouflage grouper, *E. polyphekadion*
(Bleeker, 1849) (see James et al. 1999); as well as an F1
hybrid which has been developed from the giant grouper,
*E. lanceolatus* (Bloch, 1790) and orange-spotted grouper,
*E. coioides* (Hamilton, 1822) (see Kiriyakit et al. 2011).

Natural hybrids have been reported in leopard coral-
grouper, *Plectropomus leopardus* (Lacepède, 1802) and
spotted coralgrouper, *P. maculatus* (Bloch, 1790) (see van
Herwerden et al. 2002) and in reef fishes of the family
Serranidae (see Yaakub et al. 2006). Molecular markers
are ideal for mapping inheritance patterns in fish (Liu and
Cordes 2004) and have been developed and characterized
for many species of groupers which include the humpback
grouper, *Cromileptes altivelis* (Valenciennes, 1828) (see
Na-Nakorn et al. 2010); the giant grouper, *E. lanceolatus*
(see Yang et al. 2011); the Hawaiian grouper, *Hyporthodus
quernus* (Seale, 1901) (see Rivera et al. 2003); and the
brown-marbled grouper, *E. fuscoguttatus* (see Renshaw et
al. 2012), however these molecular markers have been
used in population genetic studies and not for inferring

<footnote n="1">¹Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Borneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: Dr. Kenneth Francis Rodrigues, Biotechnology Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, phone: +6088320000-5599, fax: +6088320993, e-mail: (KFR) kennethr@ums.edu.my, (LML) niclml@yahoo.com, (SS) ssenoo@ums.edu.my, (SSQ) shafiqpab@ums.ed.my.</footnote>
parentage and inheritance as was done in the case of tilapia hybrids developed from *Oreochromis niloticus* (Linnaeus, 1758) and *Sarotherodon melanotheron* Rüppell, 1852 (see Bezault et al. 2012). The current study was based on the F1 hybrid developed at the Borneo Marine Research Institute between an *E. coioides* (Female) and *E. lanceolatus* (Male) (Koh et al. 2010). The objective of this study, which was the determination of parentage, necessitated the development of single locus genomic molecular markers, which could then be applied to verify inheritance patterns. This was done using a bottom-up approach which involved the construction of a small insert genomic library for the F1 hybrid followed by mapping of the genomic loci against the parental genotypes.

## MATERIALS AND METHODS

**Sample collection and DNA extraction.** Specimens of *Epinephelus lanceolatus*, *E. fuscoguttatus*, *E. coioides*, *E. corallicola* (Valenciennes, 1828) and F1 hybrids of *E. coioides* (Female) and *E. lanceolatus* (Male) are currently being maintained at the hatchery of the Borneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Anal fin clips of approximately 1 cm² were collected from each of the parental genotypes. An additional 64 samples were collected from one year-old F1 hybrid specimens. Ten samples were derived from *E. corallicola* and six from *E. fuscoguttatus*. DNA was extracted using the salt-ing out protocol (Aljanabi and Martinez 1997) and the concentration of DNA was adjusted with sterile nuclease free water to 200 ng · mL⁻¹ and verified using a single drop spectrophotometer (GE Life Sciences).

**Development of small insert genomic library.** A small insert genomic library was constructed by digesting 200 ng of genomic DNA from the F1 hybrid and 200 ng of the circularized cloning vector pUC19 with the following combinations of restriction enzymes Bam HI/Hind III (5 Units each), Eco RI/Bam HI (5 Units each), Eco RI/Hind III (5 Units each), Xba I/Bam HI (5 Units each), and Xba V/Hind III (5 Units each) in a reaction volume of 20 µL comprising 2× Fermentas buffer Tango (4.0 µL), restriction enzymes (5 Units), DNA (200 ng) and nuclease free water. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 3 h followed by heating to 80°C for 20 min to inactivate the restriction enzymes. The DNA fragments were resolved on a 1× Tris-Boric acid-EDTA (TBE) agarose gel (Promega) followed by gel purification using a gel extraction kit according to the manufacturers instruction (Qiagen) and subsequently ligated onto the cloning vector pUC19 in a reaction mixture comprising 2× T4 DNA ligation buffer (Fermentas) (2.0 µL), T4 DNA ligase (5 Units), genomic DNA fragments (100 ng), linearized pUC19 cloning vector (200 ng), and nuclease free water to a final volume of 20 µL. Ligation was carried out at 4°C for 16 h. The ligation mixture was transformed into chemically competent *Escherichia coli* (TOP 10) by immersion in a water bath set at 37°C for 40 s followed by plating of 100 µL of the transformed cells onto lysogeny agar containing 100 µg · mL⁻¹ of ampicillin and 5 µg · mL⁻¹ of X-Gal fol-

lowed by incubation for 16 h at 42°C. Positive transformants were selected by blue-white colony screening and single colonies were cultured in 10 mL of lysogeny broth containing ampicillin (100 µg · mL⁻¹). Plasmids were extracted using the GenJET plasmid minipreparation kit (Fermentas) followed by sequencing using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were trimmed using the Vec Screen software (NCBI) and 40 of the edited sequences were deposited at the NCBI GenBank. Sequence similarity was determined using the blast tool (Zhang et al. 2000) and sequences with a coverage in excess of 50% were deemed to be significant matches to the fish genome database.

**Design of locus specific primers and testing in parental genotypes, F1 hybrids and related groupers.** Locus specific primers were designed for each of the 40 loci using the online primer design tool Primer 3.0 (Rozen and Skaletsky 1999) and 30 primer pairs were synthesized (First Base, Singapore). Primers were reconstituted in nuclease free water to a final concentration of 100 µM. PCR amplification was performed in final volume of 20 µL which consisted of 1.2 µL MgCl₂ (1.5 mM), 0.4 µL dNTPs (0.2 mM), 4 µL 1× GoTaq buffer (Promega, USA), 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, USA), 1 µL of each primer (5 µM), 3 µL template and nuclease free water. Amplification was performed in the thermal cycler (MJ research, PTC-200) with the parameters of the cycler pre-denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, this was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 95°C), annealing (40 s at 56°C), extension (2 min at 72°C) and final extension (10 min at 72°C). PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis on a 1.5% TBE Agarose gel (Promega) followed by staining for 10 min in a solution of ethidium bromide (5 µg · mL⁻¹). Gels were then rinsed by immersion in water for 5 min and visualized and scored using a gel documentation system ALPHAIMAGER 2000 (Alpha Innotech Corp. USA).

**Ethical issues.** The samples were isolated from specimens which are currently being maintained at the Borneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, in compliance to the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) guidelines.

## RESULTS

**Sample collection and DNA extraction.** The sample collection and DNA extraction protocols yielded DNA, which was of the required quality (A₂₆₀ : A₂₈₀ = 1.8–2.0) and concentration (100–300 µg · mL⁻¹) for genomic library construction and polymerase chain reaction.

**Development of small insert genomic library.** A total of 40 genomic loci were deposited at the NCBI GenBank (Accession numbers JQ732815–JQ732778). Sequence similarity searches revealed that the following eight accessions could be mapped back to fish genomes with sequence coverage in excess of 50%: JQ732778 [Danio rerio (Hamilton, 1822)], JQ732785 (*E. lanceolatus*), JQ732786 (*E. fuscoguttatus*), JQ732785 (*E. lanceolatus* × *E. fuscoguttatus*), JQ732794 [*Perca flavescens* (Mitchill,
1814)], JQ732795 (*E. fuscoguttatus*), JQ732798
[*E. fuscoguttatus*; *Dicentrarchus labrax* (Linnaeus, 1758);
*Gasterosteus aculeatus* Linnaeus, 1758], JQ732814
*(Oreochromis niloticus)*, JQ732809 (*E. coioides* ×
*E. fuscoguttatus*), and JQ732815 (*Cromileptes altivelis*). The
remaining 32 accessions could be mapped back to the fish
genome database, however the level of coverage was less
than 50% and these matches were considered not significant.

**Design and application of locus specific genomic molecular markers.** A panel of 30 locus specific molecular markers were designed, of which 29 generated PCR amplicons of the expected size, one of the primer pairs (ECELEB008) failed to amplify in the F1 hybrid or the parents, 13 loci were found to be common to both the parents, 11 and 6 were inherited from *E. lanceolatus* and *E. coioides*, respectively (Fig. 1). Two of the loci, ECELEH007 and ECELEB001 were specific to the F1 hybrid and not associated with the parents. Three of the primers ECELBH003, ECELB013 and ECELXB003 produced two distinct bands in the F1 hybrid and one in each of the parental genotypes which were designated as A, B, and AB (Table 1). None of the molecular markers could cross-amplify in the closely related groupers *E. fuscoguttatus* and *E. corallicola*. Primer amplification was uniform across the entire set of samples which were tested.

DISCUSSION

**Genomic library development.** Small insert genomic libraries constructed using a shotgun approach provide a widely dispersed set of genomic DNA fragments which can be sequenced in order to develop single locus molecular markers. The current approach utilized five combinations of restriction enzymes in order to reduce the level of redundancy in genomic coverage. The sequences, which had a significant level of similarity to fish genomes represented non-coding regions of DNA and can be considered as Type II molecular markers.

**Design and application of locus specific genomic molecular markers.** The commercial aquaculture industry has directed a significant amount of effort towards the development of grouper hybrids as it is generally assumed that there will be an increase in the levels of allelic diversity and the associated development of characteristics which are desired in aquaculture systems. One of the major driver of this effort has been the increase in the incidence of disease and the need to develop resistant varieties (Harikrishnan et al. 2010). In conventional breeding approaches involving interspecific grouper hybrids, the selection of the parental genotypes is based purely on phenotypic characterization, for instance an F1 hybrid was developed from *E. fuscoguttatus* × *E. polyphekadion* (see James et al. 1999) solely on the basis of the higher growth rate of the hybrid when compared to the dam and sire. Contemporary approaches using molecular markers extend the scope of selection beyond the phenotype and provide a more accurate indicator of genetic compatibility and hybrid viability. Three key criteria have to be considered when selecting parental genotypes for hybridiza-

tion; the first relates to the genetic distance between
species, the second concerns interspecific genetic viabili-
ty which is governed by the Dobzhansky–Muller
Incompatibility (DMI) model and the third pertains to
variations in the number of chromosomes, which can
result in complications in chromosomal rearrangements
after the formation of the zygote. The first criterion,
which relates to genetic distance, can be resolved using
molecular phylogenetics. A reconstruction of grouper
phylogenetic trees using molecular data (Craig and
Hastings 2007) clearly delineates the relation between
groupers and *E. coioides* and *E. lanceolatus* clustered
together in one clade with a high level of confidence. This
is supported by the fact that 13 of the 29 markers tested
were shared between both *E. coioides* and *E. lanceolatus*
indicating a high level of genomic similarity at randomly
selected loci.

The second criterion which concerns DMI needs to be further examined in view of the evidence that indicates a lower percentage of survival among hybrids (Kiriyakit et al. 2011), this phenomenon has also been reported in hybrids developed in Sunfish (López-Fernández and Bolnick 2007) and has been attributed to incomplete penetration. Similar evidence for attenuation of hybrid vigor has been reported in a study involving Flounder hybrids (Xu et al. 2011) and these findings must be carefully considered prior to hybrid breeding programs involving groupers. The markers developed for this study amplified consistently in all of the F1 samples tested, these represent the individuals which have survived for a period of one year after hatching and may be indicative of the alleles which confer fitness in the case of this particular hybrid. One of the major ecological concerns associated with F1 hybrids is the possibility of their escape from containment followed by inbreeding with native populations (Allendorf et al. 2001). Two of the molecular markers developed were specific to the F1 hybrid and these can be applied for the analysis of individuals from wild grouper populations in order to detect any possible breach of containment at the aquaculture facility.

The third criterion is the uniformity in the number of
chromosomes. Karyotype analysis (Wang et al. 2009) of
groupers indicates a consistency in the number of chro-
mosomes (2n = 48) within the genus *Epinephelus* further
supporting the premise that interspecific grouper hybrids
will be viable (Stelkens et al. 2009). The application of
Haldane's rule in the case of protogynous hermaphrodites
is further complicated as there was no evidence of sexual
dimorphism in the F1 hybrids and sex reversal can take
several years (Yeh et al. 2003).

None of the markers developed in this study could be
assigned to the groupers *E. corallicola* and *E. fuscogutta-
tus*, this may provide a strong molecular basis for not
selecting these two species for hybridization with
*E. coioides* or *E. lanceolatus* owing to the genetic dis-
tance as evinced using multiple genomic loci. The study
clearly indicated that molecular markers developed using
the bottom up approach could serve as a useful tool in
determining parentage in F1 hybrids developed from
groupers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was carried out to verify parentage in F1
hybrids developed from *E. coioides* and *E. lanceolatus*.

A small insert genomic library was constructed based on the
F1 hybrid and single locus molecular markers could be
assigned to each of the parental genotypes and not to two
other closely related species of grouper. The approach adopt-
ed in this study can be applied to develop breeding programs
for interspecific hybrids based on molecular markers.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1.** Gel image of cross amplification comparing the FI grouper hybrid of *Epinephelus coioides* and *Epinephelus lanceolatus* against parental species that are *Epinephelus coioides* and *Epinephelus lanceolatus*; Lane M represents the 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega); lanes OG represent the amplification products of FI grouper hybrid of *Epinephelus coioides* and *Epinephelus lanceolatus*; Lanes O represents the amplification products of *Epinephelus coioides* and lanes G represents the amplification products of *Epinephelus lanceolatus* for the labelled genomic locus respectively</figcaption></figure>
<table><caption>**Table 1**

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification profiles of locus specific molecular markers developed for the F1 hybrid of *Epinephelus coioides* and *E. lanceolatus*</caption><thead><tr><th>No.</th><th>Primer name</th><th>Sequence from 5' through 3'</th><th>Tm</th><th>Product size [bp]</th><th>F1</th><th>EC</th><th>EL</th><th>GenBank</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2">1</td><td>ECELBH001F</td><td>CAGATGCCTGACAACCTCAA</td><td>59.83</td><td rowspan="2">814</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732777</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH001R</td><td>ACTCTCCTTGCCTCTGACCA</td><td>59.99</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">2</td><td>ECELBH002F</td><td>TAGCCTCATGCCCTCCTAGA</td><td>59.93</td><td rowspan="2">367</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732778</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH002R</td><td>GTGCCATACGGCTTTGAAAT</td><td>59.97</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">3</td><td>ECELBH003F</td><td>CCTGTCAGTGGCAACAACAA</td><td>60.76</td><td rowspan="2">311</td><td rowspan="2">AB</td><td rowspan="2">B</td><td rowspan="2">A</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732779</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH003R</td><td>GGATGGCCTGAAAATACACG</td><td>60.33</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">4</td><td>ECELBH004F</td><td>GATGAACCAAACACCCCAAC</td><td>60.07</td><td rowspan="2">399</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732780</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH004R</td><td>TCGCCACAATCTCTGAACTG</td><td>59.98</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">5</td><td>ECELBH005F</td><td>CACCACAACAGAATGGCAAC</td><td>60.01</td><td rowspan="2">712</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732781</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH005R</td><td>AAACGATCTCTCGCCAAGAA</td><td>59.96</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">6</td><td>ECELBH006F</td><td>GAAGACGGGGTGACATGTTT</td><td>59.83</td><td rowspan="2">374</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732782</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH006R</td><td>GGTGGGCATTCTTCTTTGTG</td><td>60.50</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">7</td><td>ECELBH008F</td><td>CCTGTTCCCACTGTGACTGA</td><td>59.70</td><td rowspan="2">761</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732784</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH008R</td><td>TGACCTCTTCCATTCCCTTG</td><td>60.04</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">8</td><td>ECELBH010F</td><td>ACGTGGCTTCGAGGAGTAAA</td><td>59.88</td><td rowspan="2">958</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732786</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH010R</td><td>AGAACGACCAGCCTCTTTGA</td><td>59.99</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">9</td><td>ECELBH011F</td><td>TCGCGTAACCTCTCTGTCCCT</td><td>60.01</td><td rowspan="2">383</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732787</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH011R</td><td>CCTGTGTGGAAACCAAAGGT</td><td>59.86</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">10</td><td>ECELBH012F</td><td>GCCTTTTGTTGAGGGAACTG</td><td>59.71</td><td rowspan="2">438</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732788</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH012R</td><td>CCCACCCTCATTCTCTTTCA</td><td>60.04</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">11</td><td>ECELBH013F</td><td>GGGAAAGAGAAGGTGGAAGG</td><td>60.04</td><td rowspan="2">611</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732789</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBH013R</td><td>CGTTAGTGCATCCCCCTTGAT</td><td>59.96</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">12</td><td>ECELEB001F</td><td>TCAGGAAAGCGTTGGAGAGT</td><td>59.99</td><td rowspan="2">367</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732790</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB001R</td><td>CAGGGGTAAAGGCACTTCAG</td><td>59.73</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">13</td><td>ECELEB002F</td><td>GGCAGAGAGAGAGCGAGATG</td><td>60.39</td><td rowspan="2">290</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732791</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB002R</td><td>GCTATGCAGCTACAGGCAGA</td><td>59.35</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">14</td><td>ECELEB003F</td><td>CATGGCGAGTAGGACACAGA</td><td>59.86</td><td rowspan="2">323</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732792</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB003R</td><td>CACCTCGGCTCTAAACTTCG</td><td>60.01</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">15</td><td>ECELEB005F</td><td>TCCGTTACTTCCACCAGAC</td><td>59.97</td><td rowspan="2">312</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732793</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB005R</td><td>CGACAGGAACAGCTGATGAA</td><td>59.98</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">16</td><td>ECELEB008F</td><td>GTGCCTGACAACGCTAGAAG</td><td>59.68</td><td rowspan="2">674</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732795</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB008R</td><td>CCAGGGAAACCAGCTTATGA</td><td>60.07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">17</td><td>ECELEB009F</td><td>AAATGTGTGTGGGTGGGTTT</td><td>59.99</td><td rowspan="2">453</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732796</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB009R</td><td>ATGACGTGAATCCATCAGCA</td><td>60.08</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">18</td><td>ECELEB010F</td><td>CTTTCCCTTTCCCTCACCTC</td><td>60.04</td><td rowspan="2">505</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732797</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB010R</td><td>CTGTCGTCAGGCATCTCTCA</td><td>60.14</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">19</td><td>ECELEB011F</td><td>GATTACACGCCACTCAGCAA</td><td>59.87</td><td rowspan="2">451</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732798</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB011R</td><td>TGAAAAGAAACCTGGGGTTG</td><td>59.94</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">20</td><td>ECELEB013F</td><td>CGATCCCAACCAGAGTCATT</td><td>59.93</td><td rowspan="2">506</td><td rowspan="2">AB</td><td rowspan="2">B</td><td rowspan="2">A</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732800</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEB013R</td><td>GGTTTGTCCATTCTGGGCTA</td><td>59.93</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">21</td><td>ECELEH001F</td><td>GATGTCGTGTTGGACTGTGG</td><td>60.00</td><td rowspan="2">658</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732801</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH001R</td><td>CTTCCAGCCTACCTTTGCAC</td><td>59.88</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">22</td><td>ECELEH002F</td><td>AATCTGACACCCTGGAGCTG</td><td>60.26</td><td rowspan="2">385</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732802</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH002R</td><td>ACGGGACTCAACCAAACATC</td><td>59.83</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">23</td><td>ECELEH003F</td><td>GCGACACAGGTCAAGTCTCA</td><td>60.03</td><td rowspan="2">506</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732803</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH003R</td><td>GCGATAGATCCCATCCTGAA</td><td>60.00</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">24</td><td>ECELEH004F</td><td>ACTCAACTAGCAGCCCAGGA</td><td>60.01</td><td rowspan="2">234</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732804</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH004R</td><td>TGAGGACATTTGGGGCTTAG</td><td>60.07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">25</td><td>ECELEH005F</td><td>AGTCACTGCCGCTGAAAGAT</td><td>60.02</td><td rowspan="2">752</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732805</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH005R</td><td>CCACAGGTAGAAGGCATGGT</td><td>59.99</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">26</td><td>ECELEH006F</td><td>CTAATCCTGGCTGGCATGTT</td><td>60.10</td><td rowspan="2">562</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732806</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH006R</td><td>CCACGATGACCCAGAAGAAT</td><td>59.93</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">27</td><td>ECELEH007F</td><td>AACACACCAGAAGGGTCTGC</td><td>60.16</td><td rowspan="2">733</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732807</td></tr><tr><td>ECELEH007R</td><td>TTTTTGGGGTGGCAGTAGTC</td><td>59.97</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">28</td><td>ECELBX001F</td><td>CCCTCTGGGGTAGATTGTGA</td><td>59.92</td><td rowspan="2">715</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">-</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732808</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBX001R</td><td>TATGTGGCGTGTCAGAGGAG</td><td>59.86</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">29</td><td>ECELBX002F</td><td>GACTAATGATGGCAGCAGCA</td><td>59.98</td><td rowspan="2">621</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">+</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732809</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBX002R</td><td>CTGGCTCCCTGTAAAATCCA</td><td>60.07</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">30</td><td>ECELBX003F</td><td>ATGTGCGTCTTCGAGAGGTT</td><td>59.87</td><td rowspan="2">763</td><td rowspan="2">AB</td><td rowspan="2">A</td><td rowspan="2">B</td><td rowspan="2">JQ732810</td></tr><tr><td>ECELBX003R</td><td>CACTGCAGCGCTAATAACCA</td><td>60.04</td></tr></tbody></table>

No. = number, Tm = annealing temperature, F1 = F1 hybrid, EC = *Epinephelus coioides*, EL = *Epinephelus lanceolatus*, GenBank = GenBank accession numbers for loci; positive amplification (+), no amplification (-), alleles are indicated by A, B, and AB.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture,
Government of Malaysia grant number: SCF05-01-10-SF1010.

REFERENCES

Aljanabi S.M., Martinez I. 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research **25** (22): 4692–4693.
DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.22.4692

Allendorf F.W., Leary R.F., Spruell P., Wenburg J.K. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution **16** (11): 613–622. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X

Bezault E., Rognon X., Clota F., Gharbi K., Baroiller J.-F., Chevassus B. 2012. Analysis of the meiotic segregation in intergeneric hybrids of Tilapias. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology **2012**: 10 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2012/817562

Craig M.T., Hastings P.A. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of the groupers of the subfamily Epinephelinae (Serranidae) with a revised classification of the Epinephelini (1983). Ichthyological Research **54** (1): 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s10228-006-0367-x

Glamuzina B., Glavić N., Skaramuca B., Kozul V., Tutman P. 2001. Early development of the hybrid *Epinephelus costae* ♀ × *E. marginatus* ♂. Aquaculture **198** (1–2): 55–61. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00511-1

Harikrishnan R., Balasundaram C., Heo M.-S. 2010. Molecular studies, disease status and prophylactic measures in grouper aquaculture: Economic importance, diseases and immunology. Aquaculture **309** (1–4): 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.011

James C.M., Al-Thobaiti S.A., Rasem B.M., Carlos M.H. 1999. Potential of grouper hybrid (*Epinephelus fuscoguttatus* × *E. polyphekadion*) for Aquaculture. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly **22** (1): 19–23.

Kiriyakit A., Gallardo W.G., Bart A.N. 2011. Successful hybridization of groupers (*Epinephelus coioides* × *Epinephelus lanceolatus*) using cryopreserved sperm. Aquaculture **320** (1–2): 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.012

Koh I.C.C., Sitti Raehanah M.S., Akazawa N., Ota Y., Senoo S. 2010. Egg and larval development of a new hybrid orange-spotted grouper *Epinephelus coioides* × giant grouper *E. lanceolatus*. Aquaculture Science **58** (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.11233/aquaculturesci.58.1

Liu Z.J., Cordes J.F. 2004. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture **238** (1–4): 1–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.027

López-Fernández H., Bolnick D.I. 2007. What causes partial F1 hybrid viability? Incomplete penetrance versus genetic variation. PLoS ONE **2** (12): e1294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001294

Na-Nakorn U., Yashiro R., Wachirachaikarn A., Prakoon W., Pansaen N. 2010. Novel microsatellites for multiplex PCRs in the humpback grouper, *Cromileptes altivelis* (Valenciennes, 1828), and applications for broodstock management. Aquaculture **306** (1–4): 57–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.022

Renshaw M.A., Nemeth R.S., Gold J.R. 2012. Isolation of microsatellite markers from tiger grouper (*Mycteroperca tigris*) and characterization in yellowfin grouper (*Mycteroperca venenosa*), coney (*Cephalopholis fulva*), and red hind (*Epinephelus guttatus*). Conservation Genetics Resources **4** (4): 1049–1054. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-012-9704-8

Rivera M.A.J., Graham G.C., Roderick G.K. 2003. Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci from the Hawaiian grouper *Epinephelus quernus* (Serranidae) for population genetic analyses. Marine Biotechnology **5** (2): 126–129. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-002-0093-y

Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Pp. 365-386. *In:* Misener S., Krawetz S.A. (eds.) Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Vol. 132 of Methods in Molecular Biology Humana. Press, Totowa, NJ, USA. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365

Stelkens R.B., Schmid C., Selz O., Seehausen O. 2009. Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology **9** (December) paper 283: 13 pages. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-283

van Herwerden L., Davies C.R., Choat J.H. 2002. Phylogenetic and evolutionary perspectives of the Indo-Pacific grouper *Plectropomus* species on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Fish Biology **60** (6): 1591–1596. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02451.x

Wang S., Su Y., Ding S., Cai Y., Wang J. 2009. Cytogenetic analysis of orange-spotted grouper, *Epinephelus coioides*, using chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hydrobiologia **638** (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9980-9

Xu D., You F., Li J., Wu Z., Xiao Z., Zhang P., Xu Y., Wang B. 2011. First evidence for hybrid breakdown in the backcross of olive flounder, *Paralichthys olivaceus*, and summer flounder, *Paralichthys dentatus*. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society **42** (3): 347–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00473.x

Yaakub S.M., Bellwood D.R., van Herwerden L., Walsh F.M. 2006. Hybridization in coral reef fishes: Introgression and bi-directional gene exchange in *Thalassoma* (family Labridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution **40** (1): 84–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.012

Yang S., Wang L., Zhang Y., Liu X.C., Lin H.R., Meng Z.N. 2011. Development and characterization of 32 microsatellite loci in the giant grouper *Epinephelus lanceolatus* (Serranidae). Genetics and Molecular Research **10** (4): 4006–4011. DOI: 10.4238/2011.December.12.3

Yeh S.-L., Dai Q.-C., Chu Y.-T., Kuo C.-M., Ting Y.-Y., Chang C.-F. 2003. Induced sex change, spawning and larviculture of potato grouper, *Epinephelus tukula*. Aquaculture **228** (1–4): 371–381. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00316-8

Zhang Z., Schwartz S., Wagner L., Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology **7** (1–2): 203–214. DOI: 10.1089/10665270050081478

Received: 6 May 2013

Accepted: 6 February 2014

Published electronically: 31 March 2014