# Excretion of Cell-Free and Cell-Associated Zika Virus into Breast Milk of Infected Dams and Identification of Antiviral Factors

Sophie Desgraupes, Patricia Jeannin, Antoine Gessain, Pierre-Emmanuel Ceccaldi, Aurore Vidy

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## To cite this version:

Sophie Desgraupes, Patricia Jeannin, Antoine Gessain, Pierre-Emmanuel Ceccaldi, Aurore Vidy. Excretion of Cell-Free and Cell-Associated Zika Virus into Breast Milk of Infected Dams and Identification of Antiviral Factors. Viruses, 2022, Special Issue Flaviviruses and Flavivirus Vaccines, 14 (5), pp.851. 10.3390/v14050851. pasteur-03685918

HAL Id: pasteur-03685918

https://pasteur.hal.science/pasteur-03685918

Submitted on 2 Jun 2022

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Article

# Excretion of Cell-Free and Cell-Associated Zika Virus into Breast Milk of Infected Dams and Identification of Antiviral Factors

Sophie Desgraupes, Patricia Jeannin ID, Antoine Gessain, Pierre-Emmanuel Ceccaldi * and Aurore Vidy *ID

Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3569, Unité Épidémiologie et Physiopathologie des Virus Oncogènes, F-75015 Paris, France; sophie.desgraupes@pasteur.fr (S.D.); patricia.jeannin@pasteur.fr (P.J.); antoine.gessain@pasteur.fr (A.G.)

* Correspondence: pierre-emmanuel.ceccaldi@pasteur.fr (P.-E.C.); aurore.vidy@pasteur.fr (A.V.)

**Abstract:** Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne RNA virus belonging to the *Flavivirus* genus of the *Flaviviridae* family. During the 60 years following its discovery in 1947, ZIKV caused little concern for public health as the associated infection was reported as mostly asymptomatic or inducing mild symptoms. However, since 2013, severe neurological symptoms have been associated with ZIKV infection, compelling the World Health Organization to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Among those symptoms, neurological birth defects may affect children born to mothers infected during pregnancy. Additionally, during the past 8 years, ZIKV transmission through breastfeeding has repeatedly been suggested in epidemiological studies and demonstrated on a mouse model by our team. To better understand the biological factors controlling ZIKV transmission through breastfeeding, we investigated the nature of the viral entities excreted in the breast milk of infected dams and evaluated viral transmission to breastfed pups. We show that both cell-free and cell-associated virus is excreted into breast milk and that ZIKV is efficiently transmitted to the breastfed pups. Additionally, we studied murine breast milk cell types, and identified a majority of mammary luminal cells. Finally, we investigated the effect on ZIKV infectivity of several breast milk components that are antiviral against different viruses such as lactoferrin (LF) and lactalbumin (LA), or free fatty acids (FFA). We showed no effect of LF and LA, whereas FFA inactivated the virus. These results bring new insight concerning the mechanisms of ZIKV transmission during breastfeeding and identify biological factors modulating it. These elements should be considered in risk assessment of ZIKV mother-to-child transmission.

**Keywords:** mother-to-child transmission; breastfeeding; milk cells; antiviral; fatty acids

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Desgraupes, S.; Jeannin, P.; Gessain, A.; Ceccaldi, P.-E.; Vidy, A. Excretion of Cell-Free and Cell-Associated Zika Virus into Breast Milk of Infected Dams and Identification of Antiviral Factors. *Viruses* **2022**, *14*, 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14050851

Academic Editor: Chao Shan

Received: 10 February 2022

Accepted: 17 April 2022

Published: 20 April 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## 1. Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) belonging to the *Flaviviridae* family and to the *Flavivirus* genus. It was first identified in 1947 in the Zika forest in Uganda and caused little concern for public health as ZIKV infection was reported as being mostly asymptomatic or associated with mild symptoms. During the following 60 years, only 14 human cases were reported in Southeast Asia and Africa [1]. In 2007, the first Zika fever outbreak ever described occurred in Yap islands, resulting in the infection of approximatively 5000 inhabitants (73% of the population) [2]. An even larger outbreak occurred in 2013–2014 in French Polynesia, causing approximatively 28,000 estimated cases of infection [3]. Two small outbreaks occurred that same year in New Caledonia where 1400 cases were described and in the Cook Islands where over 900 cases were reported [4]. Following the introduction of ZIKV in Brazil in 2015 [5], a large outbreak happened causing 440,000 to 1,300,000 cases [6], thus compelling the World Health Organization to declare a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern".
As 80% of ZIKV infected individuals remain asymptomatic, the number of cases estimated during these epidemics is undervalued. After a small incubation period, 20% of infected people developed mild symptoms such as fever, skin rashes, and joint pain. However, since 2013, severe neurological symptoms have been associated with ZIKV infection [7]. In adults, Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS) is the most common neurological complication, but other pathologies have been reported such as sensory polyneuropathy, sensory neuronopathy [7], and meningitis [8]. During the French Polynesian outbreak, the risk of developing a ZIKV-related GBS was estimated to be 0.24 per 1000 cases of infection [9]. Neurological birth defects, called the congenital Zika syndrome, have also been associated to ZIKV infection: children born to mothers infected during pregnancy can develop severe microcephalies, ocular abnormalities, or show decreased brain tissue [10].

ZIKV is mostly transmitted to humans by *Aedes aegypti* mosquitoes but interhuman transmission can also occur during sexual intercourse or from mother-to-child in utero [11]. During the past 8 years, ZIKV transmission through breastfeeding has repeatedly been suggested in epidemiological studies [12] and has been demonstrated on a mouse model by our team [13]. Epidemiological studies have reported the presence of viral RNA (vRNA) and/or infectious particles in the breast milk of infected mothers as well as viral persistence in breast milk after clearance from the blood stream [12]. In addition, a case of secondary microcephaly was recently reported in a breastfed infant who was negative for ZIKV at birth and showed a normal head circumference. The newborn was exclusively breastfed and ZIKV was isolated in the mother's breast milk [14], raising concern about the transmission of ZIKV during breastfeeding.

Breast milk is mainly composed of water and contains maternal cells, carbohydrates (e.g., lactose), fat, proteins, and minerals [15]. In human breast milk, both breast-derived and blood-derived cells are found. Blood-derived immune cells represent a small minority of the milk cells (<2% in mature human milk), whereas the vast majority come from the mammary gland (luminal, myoepithelial, progenitor, and stem cells). Among those, luminal and myoepithelial cells represent 98% in human milk [16]. The different components of breast milk can be separated by centrifugation into a cell pellet, the lactoserum and the cream fraction. The lactoserum, also called whey, is the liquid fraction rich in proteins, lactose, and minerals, whereas the cream fraction contains the milk fat globules (MFG). The latter are composed of a triple-layered milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) surrounding a triglyceride core [17]. The composition of breast milk varies with different factors such as the species, nutrition, or stage of lactation [15]. Indeed, during the first hours after birth, the breast milk is rich in immunological components and called colostrum, whereas transitional and mature milk produced in the following weeks become richer in nutritional factors and poorer in leukocytes.

Although protective components are transmitted to the newborn during breastfeed-
ing, deleterious factors such as drugs or pathogens can also be passed on. For humans,
three viruses are recognized as efficiently transmitted during breastfeeding: human im-
munodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), and
cytomegalovirus (CMV) [12]. These milk-borne viruses are excreted in human breast milk
in a cell-free (HIV-1 [18], CMV [19]) or cell-associated (HIV-1 [18], CMV [19], HTLV-1 [20])
form and transmitted to the infant, resulting in a chronic infection.

As breast milk components and viral entities are simultaneously present in the milk,
their interaction could lead to an enhanced or decreased viral transmission to the newborn
during breastfeeding. Indeed, some breast milk components such as prostaglandins [21]
have been shown to be proviral, whereas others such as lactoferrin (LF), monolaurin, or
free fatty acids [12] are antiviral. Breast milk has been suggested to have an antiviral effect
on some arboviruses [22], but it was further shown that the antiviral effect on ZIKV was
caused by the storage of breast milk samples at 4 °C [23]. The authors showed that the
storage of the samples leads to an increase in the free fatty acid content [24] and suggested
a role of the latter in viral inactivation. Although milk stored at 4 °C exerted an antiviral
effect, fresh breast milk from healthy donors was then tested and shown not to inactivate
ZIKV [25], raising alarm concerning its transmission during breastfeeding.

Although cases of probable transmission of ZIKV from infected mothers to breastfed newborns have been reported [12], other case reports showed a lack of transmission by breastfeeding [26]. Therefore, biological or genetic factors controlling the transmission should be investigated (viral load, viral form, immunological status, stage of lactation, etc.).

In this paper, by using an established murine model for ZIKV infection [27], we show the infectious nature of breast milk isolated from ZIKV-infected dams and we identify the nature of viral entities in breast milk as being both cell-free and cell-associated. We also determine that the majority of milk cells in murine breast milk are mammary epithelial cells. Finally, we investigate the effect of several breast milk components on ZIKV infectivity (LF, lactalbumin (LA), and free fatty acids) in order to better understand the biological factors regulating the transmission.

**2. Materials and Methods**

**2.1. Animal Model**

A129 mice (129S2/SvPas-Ifnar1tm1Agt) were used to carry out the experiments, a well-established model to study ZIKV infection. They were housed and bred at the animal facilities of the Institut Pasteur which are accredited by the French Ministry of Agriculture for breeding and performing experiments on live rodents.

**2.2. Ethics Statement**

Experiments on animals were performed in compliance with French and European regulations on care and protection of laboratory animals (EC Directive 2010/63, French Law 2013-118, 6 February 2013). All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee #89 and registered by the French "Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation" under the reference "APAFIS#16119-2018071314475930 v1" (date of approval: 19 November 2018). Use of genetically modified mice (A129) was approved by the institutional instances and the French "Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation" under the reference no. 2194 (date of approval: 6 October 2017).

**2.3. Virus Strains and Cell Lines**

All experiments were carried out using two ZIKV strains belonging to the Asian lineage (Brazil/2016, GenBank: KU991811; H/PF13, GenBank: KX369547), amplified in Vero E6 cells as previously described [28]. ZIKV suspension was added to Vero E6 cell monolayers at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for 2 h in DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After adsorption, the inoculum was removed and replaced by DMEM containing 2% FBS and 10 mM Hepes (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After 2 days of culture, supernatants were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min and aliquoted for storage at -80 °C until titration by plaque forming assay. These supernatants were used as inoculum for animal infections and in vitro experiments.

Vero E6 cells (CRL-1586, ATCC) and Caco-2 cells (Clone TC7, SCC209, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA) were grown in DMEM medium supplemented with L-glutamine (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. They were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for culture.

**2.4. Mouse Infection and Sample Collection**

For in vivo experiments, 6- to 13-week-old A129 females and males were housed and bred for mating according to animal welfare recommendations. Lactating A129 mice were infected subcutaneously from 1 to 11 days post-partum with 10⁶ PFU of the Brazil/2016 strain of ZIKV. Blood samples were collected at 3 days post-infection in tubes containing 15 mM EDTA (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and subjected to
plaque forming assays and RNA extractions to monitor the mothers' infection. For milk sample collection at 4 days post-infection, the dams were isolated from their pups for 2 h 30 to 3 h to allow the accumulation of milk in the mammary glands. To stimulate the ejection of milk from the alveoli into the lactiferous ducts, the dams were injected intra-peritoneally with 250 µL of ocytocine (Ocytovem, Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France) and put in contact with their pups during a few minutes. The dams were watched closely to let the pups start suckling but prevent them from drinking all the breast milk. After stimulation, the dams were anesthetized by intra-peritoneal injection with 100 µL of an anesthetic mix containing 5 mg/kg of xylazine (Rompun, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and 80 mg/kg of ketamine (Imalgene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany). Breast milk was collected with a Pasteur pipette by massaging the mammary glands. To evaluate the transmission, spleens were collected from euthanized pups and subjected to RNA extraction and RT-qPCR.

## 2.5. Milk Fraction Isolation

To separate the different fractions of breast milk, whole milk samples were centrifuged at 5000× g for 15 min. The cream fraction, the whey, and the cell pellet were then separated and washed twice in PBS at 5000× g for 15 min in order to increase their purity.

## 2.6. Viral RNA Extraction

vRNAs were extracted from plasma samples (obtained by blood centrifugation at 2000× g for 15 min), whole milk, cream fractions, whey fractions, and spleens, using the QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Spleens were stored at -80 °C before vRNA extractions. Spleens were thawed in PBS and dissociated using the Bullet Blender Storm shredder (Dutscher, Bernolsheim, France) in the presence of 3.2 mm steel beads (Next Advance, Troy, MO, USA). Spleen suspensions were centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min and the supernatants were used for vRNA extractions.

## 2.7. RT-qPCR

Reverse transcription was performed using random hexamers and the Maxima H Minus Reverse-Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed using 5 µL of template cDNA, with 10 µL of MasterMix (iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix, Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA), 500 nM of each ZIKV NS5-specific primer (Forward: 5'-AAR TAC ACA TAC CAR AAC AAA GTG GT-3'; Reverse: 5'-TCC RCT CCC YCT YTG GTC TTG-3'), and using the following program: 10 min/95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s/95 °C, 20 s/60 °C, and 30 s/72 °C (Mastercycler Eppendorf Realplex, Hamburg, Germany). Quantification analysis was realized using a standard curve of a ZIKV-encoding plasmid.

## 2.8. Viral Titration by Plaque Forming Assays

Vero cell monolayers were exposed to 10-fold dilutions of plasma, whole milk, cream, and whey samples in DMEM-2% FBS during 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. After viral adsorption, the inocula were removed and replaced with DMEM-2% FBS-1.6% carboxymethyl cellulose. The cells were cultured for 5 days at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. After three washes in PBS, Vero monolayers were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature (RT) and colored with crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA).

## 2.9. Co-Culture

Infectious center assays were performed by co-culturing milk cells with Vero E6 cells after 3-fold dilutions of 1 million milk cells in DMEM-2% FBS for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. DMEM-2% FBS-1.6% carboxymethyl cellulose was added and the co-cultures were kept for 6 days at 37 °C and 5% CO₂.

After three washes in PBS, Vero monolayers were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min at RT and colored with crystal violet.
## 2.10. Immune Staining and Flow Cytometry

After washing the cell pellets from breast milk samples twice in PBS, anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibodies (Invitrogen) were added for 20 min at RT in order to block mouse antibody recognition. They were diluted in MACS buffer (FBS-2% EDTA-0.5% BSA) at a ratio of 2:50. After a wash in PBS at 400× g for 4 min, the extracellular antigens were stained for 1 h at RT in the dark (ratio 1:50 for antibody:MACS) as follows: anti-mouse CD45 stained with eF450 (Invitrogen), anti-mouse CD24 stained with APC (Invitrogen), and anti-mouse CD49f stained with PE (Invitrogen). The following steps were all performed in the dark. After two washes in PBS, cells were fixed using 4% PFA for 15 min at RT. After two washes in PBS, cells were resuspended in PBS-10% cell fix (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

## 2.11. Cytotoxicity Assays

Vero or Caco-2 cells were incubated with DMEM-2% FBS, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or different concentrations of free fatty acids, LF or LA for 2 h at 37 °C. Cell layers were washed and cultured in DMEM-2% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. Cell viability was assessed at 48 h of culture by an MTT colorimetric assay (thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich). Cytotoxicity results can be found in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.

## 2.12. Viral Particle Incubation with Lactoferrin, Lactalbumin, Ethanol, or DMSO

ZIKV particles were incubated with DMEM-2% FBS or different concentrations of LF, LA, ethanol, or DMSO for 1 h at 37 °C before infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. ZIKV infectivity was assessed using the Caco-2 cell line as, physiologically, ZIKV and breast milk are in contact with the newborn's intestinal barrier. Viral inocula were added to Caco-2 monolayers in DMEM-2% FBS for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. The inocula were replaced by DMEM-2% FBS and the cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for 48 h. Cell layers were washed twice in PBS and subjected to vRNA extraction and RT-qPCR as described above.

## 2.13. Viral Particle Incubation with Free Fatty Acids

Viral inocula were incubated at 37 °C for 0 h, 1 h, 4 h, or 6 h and titrated in triplicates by plaque forming assays as described below (Tables 1 and 2).

<table><caption>**Table 1.** Free fatty acids were purchased from Sigma and resuspended at the following concentrations either in ethanol or DMSO.</caption><thead><tr><td>Fatty Acid</td><td>Stock Concentration (mg/mL)</td><td>Solvent</td><td>Reference</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C10:0</td><td>30</td><td>Ethanol</td><td>Sigma C1875</td></tr><tr><td>C14:0</td><td>12</td><td>DMSO</td><td>Sigma M3128</td></tr><tr><td>C18:0</td><td>22</td><td>Ethanol</td><td>Sigma S4751</td></tr><tr><td>C18:1</td><td>100</td><td>DMSO</td><td>Sigma O1008</td></tr><tr><td>C18:2</td><td>100</td><td>DMSO</td><td>Sigma L1376</td></tr><tr><td>C18:3</td><td>100</td><td>DMSO</td><td>Sigma L2376</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table><caption>**Table 2.** ZIKV (10⁶ PFU) was incubated either with DMEM-2% FBS, 4% PFA, or with the following non-cytotoxic concentrations of free fatty acids.</caption><thead><tr><td>Fatty Acid</td><td>Assay Concentration (mg/mL)</td><td>Condition</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>C10:0</td><td>0.6</td><td>Physiological [29]</td></tr><tr><td>C14:0</td><td>2</td><td>Physiological [29]</td></tr><tr><td>C18:0</td><td>2</td><td>Physiological [29]</td></tr><tr><td>C18:1</td><td>4</td><td>Maximum non-cytotoxic</td></tr><tr><td>C18:2</td><td>3.5</td><td>Maximum non-cytotoxic</td></tr><tr><td>C18:3</td><td>0.5</td><td>Physiological [29]</td></tr></tbody></table>
## 2.14. Cell Incubation with Free Fatty Acids, Lactoferrin, or Lactalbumin

Caco-2 cells were incubated with DMEM-2% FBS or different concentrations of free fatty acids, LF, or LA for 1 h at 37 °C before ZIKV infection (MOI 1). Viral inocula were added to Caco-2 monolayers in DMEM-2% FBS for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ then replaced by DMEM-2% FBS. The cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ for 48 h. Cell layers were washed twice in PBS and subjected to vRNA extraction and RT-qPCR as described above. The results can be found in Supplementary Figure S4.

## 2.15. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9.1.0 software. The number of experiments and the statistical tests used are detailed in the legends of the figures and presented as mean ± SD.

# 3. Results

## 3.1. ZIKV Is Efficiently Transmitted to Breastfed Pups

In order to study the transmission of ZIKV to breastfed newborn pups, 6- to 13-week-old female mice were mated with male mice. They were infected once with ZIKV ($10^6$ PFU) through the subcutaneous route, between 1 and 11 days post-partum depending on the day of parturition. Infection was assessed by RT-qPCR and plaque assays performed on plasma samples collected at 3 days post-infection. Breast milk samples and pup spleens were collected at 4 days post-infection in order to investigate the presence of ZIKV (Figure 1A). Plasma samples were obtained by blood centrifugation and approximately $10^5$ vRNA copies were detected per microliter of plasma and $10^8$ infectious particles per milliliter of plasma, confirming the infection of the dams with ZIKV (Figure 1B).

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** ZIKV is efficiently transmitted to breastfed pups. (A): Methodology of in vivo infections and sample collection for all mouse experiments. Female A129 dams were infected at 1 to 11 days post-partum with $10^6$ PFU of the Brazil/2016 strain of Zika virus (ZIKV) through the subcutaneous route (SC). Blood samples were collected from the dams at 3 days post-infection to assess ZIKV infection. Milk samples and pups' spleens were collected at 4 days post-infection to investigate the presence of ZIKV. (B): Dam infection was assessed by RT-qPCR (a) ($n = 33$ mice) and plaque assays (b) ($n = 23$ mice) in the plasma. (C): Transmission was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the spleens of the pups ($n = 83$ pups). ****: Significantly different ($p < 0.0001$) by Mann-Whitney test ($p < 0.05$).</figcaption></figure>
Pup infection was investigated by amplifying vRNA from pup spleens by RT-qPCR (Figure 1C). More than 90% of the pups that were breastfed by ZIKV-infected mothers were infected, with an average of 42.3 vRNA copies/mg of spleen.

## 3.2. Infectious Particles Are Excreted in Murine Breast Milk

To evaluate the risk of transmission of ZIKV to the newborn, the presence of ZIKV was investigated in breast milk samples of infected dams. The dam infections and sample collection were performed as previously described and murine breast milk was harvested at 4 days post-infection (Figure 1A). To assess the infectious nature of the breast milk, the presence of infectious particles was investigated by plaque assays. The tests were performed either in whole breast milk samples or in fractions isolated by three spin-wash cycles (Figure 2A). To assess infectivity of breast milk, the latter was subjected to plaque assays and revealed $3.41 \times 10^8$ PFU/mL (±standard deviation (SD) = $4.8 \times 10^8$, 11 samples) of whole milk. The cream and whey fractions contained, respectively, $1.09 \times 10^7$ (±SD = $10^7$, 5 samples) and $1.12 \times 10^9$ (±SD = $1.4 \times 10^9$, 5 samples) PFU/mL, demonstrating a high concentration of free infectious viral particles in murine breast milk (Figure 2B).

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>B</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>

**Figure 2.** Infectious particles are excreted in murine breast milk. (A): Female dams were MOCK or ZIKV-infected with the Brazil/2016 strain as described in Figure 1. Breast milk samples were collected at 4 days post-infection and centrifuged to separate the cream fraction, the whey, and the cell pellet. The cream and whey fractions were isolated and further centrifuged twice with PBS to increase their purity. (B): The concentration of infectious viral particles in whole breast milk or breast milk fractions was determined by plaque assays (whole milk: *n* = 11; cream and whey: *n* = 5).

## 3.3. Murine Breast Milk Cells Are in Majority Mammary Epithelial Cells

To determine which cell types are present in murine breast milk, we isolated the cell content from murine breast milk samples collected as previously described (Figure 1A). After separation of the different breast milk fractions by centrifugation, the cell pellet was washed twice in PBS in order to eliminate free viral particles. Immune staining and flow cytometry were performed to determine the cell types present in murine breast milk (Figure 3A). To detect epithelial and immune cells, anti-CD24 and anti-CD45 antibodies were used, respectively. An average of 70.9% (*n* = 2) and 88.5% (*n* = 7) of epithelial cells were detected in the breast milk of MOCK-infected and ZIKV-infected dams, respectively. An average of 2.85% and 1.28% of immune cells were detected in MOCK (*n* = 2) and
ZIKV (*n* = 7) breast milk samples (Figure 3B,D). To further characterize the epithelial cells detected in murine breast milk, CD49f expression was studied as it is differentially expressed by mammary epithelial cells. Indeed, luminal cells are CD24<sup>high</sup>/CD49f<sup>+</sup> while myoepithelial cells are CD24<sup>low</sup>/CD49f<sup>+</sup>, and progenitor cells (immature luminal cells) are CD24<sup>high</sup>/CD49f<sup>high</sup>. In all breast milk samples, the majority of cells were CD24<sup>high</sup>/CD49f<sup>+</sup> with an average of 68% in MOCK samples (*n* = 2) and 79.1% in ZIKV samples (*n* = 7). No clear population of CD24<sup>low</sup>/CD49f<sup>+</sup> cells was detected in any of the samples, while some (MOCK: 2/2; ZIKV: 5/7) contained CD24<sup>high</sup>/CD49f<sup>high</sup> cells ranging from 1.24% to 8.6% in MOCK samples and 1.88% to 15.2% in ZIKV samples (Figure 3C,E).

<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Breast milk cells of infected or non-infected mice are in majority mammary epithelial cells. (A): Breast milk samples collected from MOCK or ZIKV-infected dams with the Brazil/2016 strain at 4 days post-infection were centrifuged to separate the cream fraction, the whey, and the cell pellet. The cells were then subjected to two spin-wash cycles in PBS in order to eliminate any free viral particles left from the liquid fractions. Antigen expression was analyzed by immune staining and flow cytometry. (B): Anti-CD45 and anti-CD24 antibodies were used to detect and quantify immune and epithelial cells respectively. (C): CD49f expression was used to identify mammary epithelial cells among the CD45-negative cells determined in (B). The results of one experiment are presented (MOCK: *n* = 2, ZIKV: *n* = 7). (D): histogram representation of CD45-positive (immune) or CD24-positive (epithelial) cells in breast milk of MOCK or ZIKV-infected dams (MOCK: *n* = 2, ZIKV: *n* = 7). (E): histogram representation of mature and immature luminal mammary cells in breast milk, determined among the CD45-negative cells (MOCK: *n* = 2, ZIKV: *n* = 7).</figcaption></figure>

3.4. *Infectious Cell-Associated ZIKV Is Excreted in Murine Breast Milk*

In order to determine whether cells present in the milk are capable of transmitting
the infection, co-cultures were performed between milk cells (purified as previously)
and permissive target cells (Vero) in presence of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). Vero cell infection was assessed by the observation of plaque formation after crystal violet staining (Figure 4A). In the same murine breast milk samples, the viral titers in whole milk (Figure 4B) and the number of infectious cells per million of total cells (Figure 4C) were determined. While viral titers in whole breast milk ranged from 6.33 × 10⁴ to 1.08 × 10⁹ PFU/mL (mean: 3.41 × 10⁸ PFU/mL) in samples collected from ZIKV-infected dams, the number of cells capable of transmitting the infection ranged from 1.65 × 10¹ to 2.3 × 10⁴ cells/10⁶ cells (mean: 5 × 10³ cells/10⁶ cells), with a correlation between whole milk titers and the number of infectious cells (Spearman test, rho = 0.9).

A

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>

B

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>

C

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

**Figure 4.** Infectious cell-associated ZIKV is excreted in murine breast milk. (A): Female dams were MOCK or ZIKV-infected with the Brazil/2016 strain as described in Figure 1. Breast milk samples were collected at 4 days post-infection and cell pellets were purified by three spin-wash cycles in PBS to eliminate free viral particles. (B): The viral titers in the same breast milk samples were determined by plaque assay on Vero cells. (C): For each sample (n = 6), duplicates of one million cells were serially diluted and co-cultured with Vero cells for 2 h at 37 °C. The cells were then co-cultured in medium containing carboxymethylcellulose for 6 days at 37 °C. After three PBS washes and PFA 4% fixation, the cell layers were stained with crystal violet and plaques were counted manually. \* and \*\*: Significantly different (B: *p* = 0.0015; C: *p* = 0.023) by Mann-Whitney test (*p* < 0.05).

### 3.5. Lactoferrin and Lactalbumin Are Not Antiviral against ZIKV

In order to identify proviral or antiviral breast milk factors, the effect of LF and LA on ZIKV infectivity was studied by pre-incubation of different physiological concentrations (as reported in human breast milk [30,31]) of these factors with viral particles and subsequent infection of Caco-2 cells. The Caco-2 cell line was chosen to assess ZIKV infectivity because, physiologically, ZIKV and breast milk are in contact with the newborn's intestinal barrier.
The infection of the target cells was quantified by RNA extraction and vRNA amplification by RT-qPCR (Figure 5). Approximately 10⁶ vRNA copies/µg of total RNA were detected in the Caco-2 cells with no significant difference between the non-treated, LF-treated, and LA-treated virus, suggesting the absence of effect of these factors on ZIKV infectivity.

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** Lactoferrin and lactalbumin are not antiviral against ZIKV. ZIKV H/PF13 particles were incubated with culture medium (NT), lactoferrin, or lactalbumin (at physiological concentrations of human milk) for 1 h at 37 °C before infection of Caco-2 cells (MOI 1). At 48 h post-infection, cell layers were washed twice in PBS. After intracellular RNA extraction, viral RNAs were amplified by RT-qPCR (n = 3). ns: Non significantly different by Kruskal-Wallis test (*p* < 0.05).</figcaption></figure>

3.6. *Free Fatty Acids Are Antiviral against ZIKV*

In order to identify whether free fatty acids exert antiviral activity against ZIKV, as they
have been shown to inactivate other enveloped viruses, viral particles were pre-incubated
with six free fatty acids present in human breast milk (C10:0, C14:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, and
C18:3) before Vero cell infection and titration by plaque assay (Figure 6A). Viral particles
were either pre-incubated with culture medium, PFA 4%, free fatty acids, or the solvent
used to resuspend them (either ethanol or DMSO) (Table 1). The cytotoxicity assays of
free fatty acids on target cells can be found in Supplementary Figure S1 and only non-
cytotoxic concentrations were used for the antiviral assays (Table 2). No inactivation of
the non-treated virus was observed over time, while pre-incubation with PFA 4% resulted
in the inactivation of the virus in less than 1 h (first time point tested) as expected. The
saturated fatty acids C10:0 and C14:0 exerted no effect on ZIKV infectivity for up to 6 h
of incubation while C18:0 became antiviral after 4 h (Figure 6B). The mono-unsaturated
fatty acid C18:1 inactivated ZIKV in less than 1 h of incubation, while the poly-unsaturated
fatty acids C18:2 and C18:3 inactivated ZIKV in 4 h (Figure 6B), suggesting a role of the
unsaturations in viral inactivation. The pre-incubation of the viral particles with ethanol
or DMSO resulted in a slight decrease in viral infectivity for most of the concentrations
tested except for the C18:0 control which decreased 5 log at 6 h of incubation. But as C18:0
inactivated ZIKV in less than 4 h of incubation (when the solvent did not), these results
suggest an antiviral effect of C18:0.
on Vero cells [32]. To better characterize the milk-associated virus, we separated different milk fractions. The cream and whey fractions were separated from the cell pellet by centrifugation and further isolated by several spin-wash cycles. Infectious viral particles were found in both fractions at 10⁷ and 10⁹ PFU/mL, respectively. These results demonstrate that infectious cell-free viral particles are present in breast milk, thus risking transmission to the offspring. Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain the origin of the viral particles in breast milk [12]: Free viral particles in breast milk could have been excreted by mammary luminal epithelial cells as they produce milk and are permissive to ZIKV infection [28]. Although it is less likely, viral particles could also be locally produced in breast milk by infected cells.

The cell pellet was also tested to investigate the ability of breast milk cells to transmit ZIKV. Infectious plaque forming units were detected when co-culturing milk-cells from infected dams with permissive Vero cells (whereas no plaques were observed using milk-cells from MOCK-infected mothers), suggesting the existence of cell-associated virus within breast milk.

To describe more accurately the cell content of the breast milk and thus identify the potentially infectious cell types, we performed flow cytometry experiments using epithelial (CD24) and immune (CD45) cell markers. We observed a majority of epithelial cells ranging from 74.4% to 99% versus an average of 1.28% of CD45-positive cells in breast milk from infected dams, comparable to values observed in breast milk from MOCK dams. These results, obtained using murine milk, are comparable to studies performed on human milk [16]: Witkowska-Zimny et al. detected from 60% to 98% of epithelial cells in mature human milk and less than 2% of immune cells. As the breast milk composition fluctuates during lactation, the epithelial-immune cell ratio varies over time. As described previously, the colostrum is rich in immunological factors whereas the transitional and mature milks are rich in nutritious elements. Here, in mature milk, we further characterized the epithelial cells to determine whether luminal, myoepithelial or progenitor cells from the mammary gland are found in breast milk. Using the CD49f marker, we showed that murine breast milk of ZIKV-infected mice contains mature luminal cells (74.8%) and immature progenitors (4.28%), but no clear population of myoepithelial cells was detected. These results seem coherent with the structure of the mammary epithelium as luminal and progenitor cells are in contact with the lumen of the lactiferous ducts while myoepithelial cells are found beneath the tight luminal cell monolayer [33]. As luminal mammary cells are permissive to ZIKV [28] and predominant in murine breast milk, they could be infected or carry adsorbed ZIKV particles at their surface in the milk. According to a mechanism we suggested [12], infected mammary luminal cells could detach from the mammary epithelium, thus introducing cell-associated ZIKV into the breast milk.

The transmission of ZIKV to breastfed pups was evaluated in the spleens and revealed a very high rate of viral transmission (>90%), with splenic viral loads ranging from 0.93 to 4 × 10² vRNA copies/mg. The viral loads remain relatively low, most probably due to the very early stage of the pups' infection [13].

According to our previous studies, ZIKV is produced in mouse mammary glands with a peak at 6 days post-subcutaneous infection [28]. Because we observed a reduction in milk production as early as day 5, breast milk samples had to be collected at day 4. As the dams were euthanized after harvesting as much breast milk as possible, pup spleens had to be collected at day 4 as well. However, to optimize the study of the transmission during breastfeeding and detect higher viral loads, pup spleens should be harvested a few days after the peak of production and excretion of ZIKV by the mammary gland. Previously, we already demonstrated that ZIKV is efficiently transmitted during breastfeeding to 1- to 3-day-old pups [13]. Here, we show that older pups are infected through breastfeeding as well (up to 11 days old), even as the impermeability of the intestinal barrier increases [34].

To understand which biological factors could regulate the transmission of ZIKV during breastfeeding, we investigated the effect of several antiviral factors of breast milk, such as LF, LA, and free fatty acids, on ZIKV infectivity. No antiviral effect of LF or LA was
observed on ZIKV, although they have been shown to decrease viral infectivity of multiple viruses, such as HIV-1 and CMV [12,35]: LF prevents viral adsorption at the cell membrane, either by interacting with the viral particle (e.g., with gp120 of HIV-1 [36]) or with the target cells (e.g., with heparins [37]). The effect of LF and LA on ZIKV target cells was also investigated (Supplementary Figure S4) but no antiviral effect was observed at any of the physiological concentrations tested. Free fatty acids were shown to inactivate enveloped viruses by interfering with the viral envelope [38]. Here, we studied their effect on ZIKV to better understand the antiviral mechanism of breast milk stored at 4 °C. Both the saturated fatty acid C18:0 and unsaturated fatty acids C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 exerted an antiviral effect against ZIKV at physiological concentrations. These results confirm the hypothetical mechanism of viral inactivation in refrigerated or frozen breast milk suggested by Pfaender et al. [24]. Indeed, they suggested that upon refrigeration, the MFGM becomes altered, thus exposing the triglyceride core to lipases present in breast milk. The free fatty acids produced would then alter the viral envelope integrity. However, as breast milk storage is responsible for the increase in free fatty acids [24], fresh breast milk does not have an antiviral effect, as demonstrated by Conzelmann et al. [25]. Finally, free fatty acids did not decrease the infection when target cells were treated before viral adsorption, thus showing no effect on the cell receptors or on the early steps of the viral cycle.

**5. Conclusions**

ZIKV transmission through breastfeeding has been described in several cases in past years but is not systematic. In previous studies, we described the ability of ZIKV to cross the intestinal barrier of breastfed pups and to be transmitted by breastfeeding to very young pups (1 to 3 days old) [13]. Here, we show that even older pups (up to 11 days old) are also very susceptible to infection through breastfeeding. In order to understand the biological factors regulating this transmission, we performed in vivo infections of breastfeeding A129 dams and showed that ZIKV is excreted into breast milk as both cell-free and cell-associated virus. Among the different biological factors we investigated (LF, LA, and free fatty acids), the free fatty acids C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 were shown to exert an antiviral effect. As the free fatty acid content in breast milk varies with nutrition, these results should be considered in risk assessment of ZIKV transmission through breastfeeding in order to better advise infected mothers.

**Supplementary Materials:** The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14050851/s1, Figure S1: Effect of free fatty acids on the cell viability.; Figure S2: Effect of Lactoferrin and lactalbumin on the cell viability.; Figure S3: Control of the effect of the solvents on ZIKV.; Figure S4: Effect of Caco-2 incubation with fatty acids, lactoferrin or lactalbumin before infection.

**Author Contributions:** Conceptualization, S.D., P.-E.C. and A.V.; methodology, S.D., P.J., P.-E.C. and A.V.; formal analysis, S.D.; validation, P.-E.C. and A.V.; investigation, S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D.; writing—review and editing, S.D., P.-E.C., A.V. and A.G.; supervision, P.-E.C. and A.V.; visualization, S.D., P.-E.C. and A.V.; project administration, P.-E.C. and A.V.; funding acquisition, P.-E.C. and A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** S.D. was the recipient of a PhD fellowship from the French ministry of education and research for this project.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institut Pasteur of Paris (dap 180026; 11/19/2018) and the French "Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation" (APAFIS#16119-2018071314475930 v1).

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** We thank Mathieu Hubert (Institut Pasteur) for his participation in the milk collection during the last experiment, Philippe Afonso (Institut Pasteur) for improving the manuscript, Emeline Perthame (Bioinformatics and Biostatistics HUB, Institut Pasteur) for improving the statistical analysis and Valérie Choumet (Institut Pasteur) for helpful advice.
**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## References

1. Faye, O.; Freire, C.C.; Iamarino, A.; Faye, O.; de Oliveira, J.V.; Diallo, M.; Zanotto, P.M. Molecular evolution of Zika virus during its emergence in the 20th century. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **2014**, *8*, 36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Duffy, M.R.; Chen, T.-H.; Hancock, W.T.; Powers, A.M.; Kool, J.L.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Pretrick, M.; Marfel, M.; Holzbauer, S.; DuBray, C.; et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2009**, *360*, 2536–2543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Musso, D.; Nilles, E.J.; Cao-Lormeau, V.-M. Rapid spread of emerging Zika virus in the Pacific area. *Clin. Microbiol. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.* **2014**, *20*, O595–O596. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Roth, A.; Mercier, A.; Lepers, C.; Hoy, D.; Duituturaga, S.; Benyon, E.; Guillaumot, L.; Souarès, Y. Concurrent outbreaks of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections—An unprecedented epidemic wave of mosquito-borne viruses in the Pacific 2012–2014. *Eurosurveillance* **2014**, *19*, 20929. [CrossRef]

5. Campos, G.S.; Bandeira, A.C.; Sardi, S.I. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. *Emerg. Infect. Dis.* **2015**, *21*, 1885–1886. [CrossRef]

6. Hennessey, M.; Fischer, M.; Staples, J.E. Zika Virus Spreads to New Areas—Region of the Americas, May 2015–January 2016. *MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.* **2016**, *65*, 55–58. [CrossRef]

7. Carod-Artal, F.J. Neurological complications of Zika virus infection. *Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther.* **2018**, *16*, 399–410. [CrossRef]

8. Wright, J.K.; Castellani, L.; Lecce, C.; Khatib, A.; Bonta, M.; Boggild, A.K. Zika Virus-Associated Aseptic Meningitis and Guillain–Barre Syndrome in a Traveler Returning from Latin America: A Case Report and Mini-Review. *Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep.* **2019**, *21*, 3. [CrossRef]

9. Cao-Lormeau, V.-M.; Blake, A.; Mons, S.; Lastère, S.; Roche, C.; Vanhomwegen, J.; Dub, T.; Baudouin, L.; Teissier, A.; Larre, P.; et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: A case-control study. *Lancet* **2016**, *387*, 1531–1539. [CrossRef]

10. Rasmussen, S.A.; Jamieson, D.J.; Honein, M.A.; Petersen, L.R. Zika Virus and Birth Defects—Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2016**, *374*, 1981–1987. [CrossRef]

11. Gregory, C.J.; Oduyebo, T.; Brault, A.C.; Brooks, J.T.; Chung, K.-W.; Hills, S.; Kuehnert, M.J.; Mead, P.; Meaney-Delman, D.; Rabe, I.; et al. Modes of Transmission of Zika Virus. *J. Infect. Dis.* **2017**, *216*, S875–S883. [CrossRef]

12. Desgraupes, S.; Hubert, M.; Gessain, A.; Ceccaldi, P.-E.; Vidy, A. Mother-to-Child Transmission of Arboviruses during Breastfeeding: From Epidemiology to Cellular Mechanisms. *Viruses* **2021**, *13*, 1312. [CrossRef]

13. Hubert, M.; Jeannin, P.; Burlaud-Gaillard, J.; Roingeard, P.; Gessain, A.; Ceccaldi, P.-E.; Vidy, A. Evidence That Zika Virus Is Transmitted by Breastfeeding to Newborn A129 (Ifnar1 Knock-Out) Mice and Is Able to Infect and Cross a Tight Monolayer of Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. *Front. Microbiol.* **2020**, *11*, 524678. [CrossRef]

14. Mello, A.S.; Bertozzi, A.P.A.P.; Rodrigues, M.M.D.; Gazeta, R.E.; Moron, A.F.; Soriano-Arandes, A.; Sarmento, S.G.P.; Vedovello, D.; Silva, A.C.B.; Fajardo, T.; et al. Development of Secondary Microcephaly After Delivery: Possible Consequence of Mother-Baby Transmission of Zika Virus in Breast Milk. *Am. J. Case Rep.* **2019**, *20*, 723–725. [CrossRef]

15. Ballard, O.; Morrow, A.L. Human Milk Composition. Nutrients and Bioactive Factors. *Pediatr. Clin. N. Am.* **2013**, *60*, 49–74. [CrossRef]

16. Witkowska-Zimny, M.; Kaminska-El-Hassan, E. Cells of human breast milk. *Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett.* **2017**, *22*, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17. Argov, N.; Lemay, D.G.; German, J.B. Milk Fat Globule structure & function; Nanosciece comes to milk production. *Trends Food Sci. Technol.* **2008**, *19*, 617–623.

18. Ndirangu, J.; Viljoen, J.; Bland, R.M.; Danaviah, S.; Thorne, C.; Van de Perre, P.; Newell, M.-L. Cell-Free (RNA) and Cell-Associated (DNA) HIV-1 and Postnatal Transmission through Breastfeeding. *PLoS ONE* **2012**, *7*, e51493. [CrossRef]

19. Asanuma, H.; Numazaki, K.; Nagata, N.; Hotsubo, T.; Horino, K.; Chiba, S. Role of Milk Whey in the Transmission of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Breast Milk. *Microbiol. Immunol.* **1996**, *40*, 201–204. [CrossRef]

20. Ureta-Vidal, A.; Angelin-Duclos, C.; Tortevoye, P.; Murphy, E.; Jolly, N.; Joubert, M.; Carles, G.; Moreau, J.-P.; Gessain, A. Mother-to-child transmission of human T-cell-leukemia/lymphoma virus type I: Implication of high antiviral antibody titer and high proviral load in carrier mothers. *Int. J. Cancer* **1999**, *82*, 832–836. [CrossRef]

21. Clarke, N.; May, J. Effect of antimicrobial factors in human milk on rhinoviruses and milk-borne cytomegalovirus in vitro. *J. Med. Microbiol.* **2000**, *49*, 719–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Welsh, J.K.; Skurrie, I.J.; May, J.T. Use of Semliki forest virus to identify lipid-mediated antiviral activity and anti-alphavirus immunoglobulin A in human milk. *Infect. Immun.* **1978**, *19*, 395–401. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Pfaender, S.; Vielle, N.J.; Ebert, N.; Steinmann, E.; Alves, M.P.; Thiel, V. Inactivation of Zika virus in human breast milk by prolonged storage or pasteurization. *Virus Res.* **2017**, *228*, 58–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Pfaender, S.; Heyden, J.; Friesland, M.; Ciesek, S.; Ejaz, A.; Steinmann, J.; Steinmann, J.; Malarski, A.; Stoiber, H.; Tsiavaliaris, G.; et al. Inactivation of Hepatitis C Virus Infectivity by Human Breast Milk. *J. Infect. Dis.* **2013**, *208*, 1943–1952. [CrossRef]
25. Conzelmann, C.; Zou, M.; Groß, R.; Harms, M.; Röcker, A.; Riedel, C.U.; Münch, J.; Müller, J.A. Storage-Dependent Generation of Potent Anti-ZIKV Activity in Human Breast Milk. *Viruses* **2019**, *11*, 591. [CrossRef]

26. Centeno-Tablante, E.; Medina-Rivera, M.; Finkelstein, J.; Herman, H.; Rayco-Solon, P.; Garcia-Casal, M.; Rogers, L.; Ghezzi-Kopel, K.; Leal, M.Z.; Velasquez, J.A.; et al. Update on the Transmission of Zika Virus Through Breast Milk and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. *Viruses* **2021**, *13*, 123. [CrossRef]

27. Dowall, S.D.; Graham, V.A.; Rayner, E.; Atkinson, B.; Hall, G.; Watson, R.J.; Bosworth, A.; Bonney, L.C.; Kitchen, S.; Hewson, R. A Susceptible Mouse Model for Zika Virus Infection. *PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **2016**, *10*, e0004658. [CrossRef]

28. Hubert, M.; Chiche, A.; Legros, V.; Jeannin, P.; Montange, T.; Gessain, A.; Ceccaldi, P.-E.; Vidy, A. Productive Infection of Mouse Mammary Glands and Human Mammary Epithelial Cells by Zika Virus. *Viruses* **2019**, *11*, 950. [CrossRef]

29. Cruz-Hernandez, C.; Goeuriot, S.; Giuffrida, F.; Thakkar, S.K.; Destaillats, F. Direct quantification of fatty acids in human milk by gas chromatography. *J. Chromatogr. A* **2013**, *1284*, 174-179. [CrossRef]

30. Yang, Z.; Jiang, R.; Chen, Q.; Wang, J.; Duan, Y.; Pang, X.; Jiang, S.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Lönnerdal, B.; et al. Concentration of Lactoferrin in Human Milk and Its Variation during Lactation in Different Chinese Populations. *Nutrients* **2018**, *10*, 1235. [CrossRef]

31. Jackson, J.G.; Janszen, D.B.; Lonnerdal, B.; Lien, E.L.; Pramuk, K.P.; Kuhlman, C.F. A multinational study of α-lactalbumin concentrations in human milk. *J. Nutr. Biochem.* **2004**, *15*, 517-521. [CrossRef]

32. Regla-Nava, J.A.; Viramontes, K.M.; Vozdolska, T.; Huynh, A.-T.; Villani, T.; Gardner, G.; Johnson, M.; Ferro, P.J.; Shresta, S.; Kim, K. Detection of Zika virus in mouse mammary gland and breast milk. *PLOS Negl. Trop. Dis.* **2019**, *13*, e0007080. [CrossRef]

33. Huebner, R.J.; Lechler, T.; Ewald, A.J. Developmental stratification of the mammary epithelium occurs through symmetry-breaking vertical divisions of apically positioned luminal cells. *Development* **2014**, *141*, 1085-1094. [CrossRef]

34. Holmes, J.L.; Van Itallie, C.M.; Rasmussen, J.E.; Anderson, J.M. Claudin profiling in the mouse during postnatal intestinal development and along the gastrointestinal tract reveals complex expression patterns. *Gene Expr. Patterns* **2006**, *6*, 581-588. [CrossRef]

35. Ng, T.B.; Cheung, R.C.F.; Wong, J.H.; Wang, Y.; Ip, D.T.M.; Wan, D.C.C.; Xia, J. Antiviral activities of whey proteins. *Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.* **2015**, *99*, 6997-7008. [CrossRef]

36. Swart, P.; Kuipers, M.; Smit, C.; Pauwels, R.; De Béthune, M.; De Clercq, E.; Meijer, D.; Huisman, J. Antiviral Effects of Milk Proteins: Acylation Results in Polyanionic Compounds with Potent Activity against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Types 1 and 2 in Vitro. *AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.* **1996**, *12*, 769-775. [CrossRef]

37. Van Berkel, P.H.C.; Geerts, E.J.M.; Van Veen, A.H.; Mericskay, M.; De Boer, A.H.; Nuijens, H.J. N-terminal stretch Arg2, Arg3, Arg4 and Arg5 of human lactoferrin is essential for binding to heparin, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, human lysozyme and DNA. *Biochem. J.* **1997**, *328*, 145-151. [CrossRef]

38. Thormar, H.; Isaacs, E.C.; Brown, H.R.; Barshatzky, M.R.; Pessolano, T. Inactivation of enveloped viruses and killing of cells by fatty acids and monoglycerides. *Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.* **1987**, *31*, 27-31. [CrossRef]