<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

PARTHENOS

Pooling Activities, Resources and Tools
for Heritage E-research Networking,
Optimization and Synergies

# Create Impact with your eHumanities and eHeritage Research

*(Juliane Stiller and Klaus Thoden)*

## A Webinar of the PARTHENOS eHumanities and eHeritage Series

Picture: CC-BY-SA Europeana

Webinar start: 08.02.2018, 11:00 CET

Moderation: Ulrike Wuttke

(University of Applied Sciences Potsdam)

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Fachhochschule Potsdam
University of
Applied Sciences

Join the conversation on Twitter:

#PARTHENOSWebinar

@Parthenos_EU
PARTHENOS eHumanities and eHeritage Webinar Series

Create Impact with
your eHumanities
and
eHeritage Research

Juliane Stiller (Humboldt-University Berlin) & Klaus Thoden (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin)

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Date and Time: 08.02.2028, 11:00 - 12:00 CET

Moderation: Ulrike Wuttke
(University of Applied Sciences Potsdam)

Join the conversation on Twitter:

#PARTHENOSWebinar

@Parthenos_EU
## Some Housekeeping...

* As a participant you will be **muted** and not be seen throughout the webinar.

* For **questions and remarks** please use the **chat**. For questions, please use the word **question**.

* Your questions are going to be answered by the trainers during / after the presentation.

* If you have **sound problems**, please test your technical settings. You have to click on the **speaker symbol** on top to be able to hear (it has to be **green**).

* **Help us improve:** Follow up e-mail with a link to a short **feedback survey**.

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>
# Some words about PARTHENOS...

* PARTHENOS stands for: Pooling Activities, Resources and Tools for Heritage eResearch Networking, Optimization and Synergies

* PARTHENOS is a **Horizon 2020** project with the aim to **strengthen the cohesion of** Heritage related E-research

* Running time: 1 May 2015 - 30 April 2019

* PARTHENOS has 16 partners from 9 European countries

* PARTHENOS Coordinator: PIN Scrl (Italy)

* The PARTHENOS webinar series is a **cross PARTHENOS** training effort

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /></figure>
# Create Impact with your eHumanities and eHeritage Research

## Trainers

<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Dr Juliane Stiller**
(Humboldt-University Berlin, Germany)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Klaus Thoden, M.A.**
(Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany)</figcaption></figure>

<caption>**Dr Ulrike Wuttke**
(University of Applied Sciences Potsdam, Germany)</caption>

## Moderation

FH;P
Fachhochschule Potsdam
University of
Applied Sciences

<figure><img src="image_8.png" /></figure>
<figure><img src="image_9.png" /><figcaption>Cartography OpenStreetMap, licensed as CC BY-SA [copyright page].</figcaption></figure>

Which country are you
participating from?

<figure><img src="image_10.png" /></figure>
Create Impact with your
eHumanities and eHeritage-Research

Juliane Stiller & Klaus Thoden

<figure><img src="image_11.png" /></figure>
Research Life Cycle

<figure><img src="image_12.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_13.png" /></figure>
# The Scholarly workflow is changing in terms of

* Information infrastructures we use,

* Research objects we study,

* The way we link knowledge,

* The way we collaborate,

* The spaces in which research takes place,

* The research methods we pratice,

* The research results we publish,

* The way we disseminate results,

* The way we measure impact,

* And much more.
Infrastructures

<figure><img src="image_14.png" /></figure>

„Bibliothek“ by [Rosenholz219](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/) (CC-BY-ND 2.0)

<figure><img src="image_15.png" /></figure>

www.clarin.eu

<figure><img src="image_16.png" /></figure>

www.dariah.eu

<figure><img src="image_17.png" /></figure>
Research Objects

<figure><img src="image_18.png" /><figcaption>„Manuscript“ von [clio1789](https://openwhitenoise.github.io/clio1789/) (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_19.png" /><figcaption>Screenshot von [Perseus Digital Library](https://www.perseus.org)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_20.png" /></figure>
Linking Knowledge

would have awaited it in horror.

"Unquestionably," said Mr Wentworth —"Oh it will be a precious time—a time of refreshing for the soul.—The enemies of the Lord shall then be found liars!"

"And is it possible, sir, you can find pleasure in such a clash of creeds, tenets, and tempers?—Why, the Synod of Dor-drecht itself will be a Quakers' meeting to such a Babel."

"Without controversy," said Mr Wentworth, "great is the mystery of godliness."*

* This glaring misconstruction of a well-known text I have met in print in the work of an American controversialist. I have introduced it as a hint to those who

<figure><img src="image_21.png" /></figure>

„Linking Open Data cloud diagram 2017“, by Andrejs Abele, John P. McCrae, Paul Buitelaar, Anja Jentzsch and Richard Cyganiak.

http://lod-cloud.net/ (CC BY-SA 3.0)

“Women (v.1, 149-50, footnote)” by Early Novels Database (CC BY 2.0)

<figure><img src="image_22.png" /></figure>
Collaboration

<figure><img src="image_23.png" /></figure>

Jan Vermeer: [De astronoom](https://deastronoom.com)

<figure><img src="image_24.png" /></figure>

„Europeana-9“ von [Europeana EU](https:// Europeana.eu) ([CC BY-SA 2.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/))

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

<figure><img src="image_25.png" /></figure>
Spaces

<figure><img src="image_26.png" /><figcaption>„David (Michelangelo)“ von **Olivier Bruchez** (CC BY-SA 2.0)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_27.png" /><figcaption>Gif from video „David Statue by Michelangelo 3D model“ by soulstice 3D</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_28.png" /></figure>
Publications

<figure><img src="image_29.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_30.png" /><figcaption>„Book“ by Sam (CC BY-SA 2.0)</figcaption></figure>

Snapshot of Zenodo
Methods

<figure><img src="image_31.png" /></figure>

„Read/Review“ by [Sebastien Wiertz](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) (CC BY 2.0)

<figure><img src="image_32.png" /></figure>

Frank Fischer, Mathias Göbel, Dario Kampkaspar, Peer Trilcke: Schiller, Friedrich: Kabale und Liebe (1784) (CC BY 4.0)
Dissemination

<figure><img src="image_33.png" /><figcaption>„Vitoria-University-Library Food-Science-Journals“ by Vmenkov (CC BY-SA 3.0)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_34.png" /><figcaption>"Growing Social Media Influence on Digital Marketing" by mkhmarketing (CC BY 2.0)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_35.png" /></figure>
# Impact

<figure><img src="image_36.png" /><figcaption>Snapshot of InCites Journal Citation Reports</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_37.png" /><figcaption>Screenshots of altmetrics in PLOS</figcaption></figure>
In this webinar, we will investigate ...

* How you can create impact with your research by

* Using enhanced publication forms

* Disseminating your research output widely

* Communicating benefits of your research to stakeholders
And you?

* If you do not see the poll, please exit the full screen

<figure><img src="image_38.png" /></figure>
# Changing the Way We Publish

<figure><img src="image_39.png" /></figure>
Exploring new ways of publishing

<figure><img src="image_40.png" /><figcaption>Robert Goulding's desk, working on the manuscripts of Thomas Harriot</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_41.png" /><figcaption>Snapshot of a [Graphgist with Impactomatrix data](#)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_42.png" /></figure>
# Exploring new ways of publishing

* New research methods

* New forms of output

* Documentation of methods, datasets, tools, parameters

* Transparent research
<figure><img src="image_43.png" /></figure>
* No reward or reputation for data publications

* Raw data regarded as too precious to publish

* Thus no incentive to publish them

<figure><img src="image_44.png" /></figure>
Exploring new ways of publishing

<figure><img src="image_45.png" /><figcaption>A map of the internet as of 2003, The Opte
Project (CC-BY-NC)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_46.png" /><figcaption>A map of the internet as of 2010, The Opte
Project (CC-BY-NC)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_47.png" /><figcaption>A map of the internet as of 2015, The Opte
Project (CC-BY-NC)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_48.png" /></figure>
# Exploring new ways of publishing

* Offering content as webpages means removing boundaries between resources

* Fine grained citations

* Re-use of browser functionalities (e. g. annotations)

* Adaption of sources to media type (big screen vs smartphone)
# Exploring new ways of publishing

## Kapitel 1
Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu*

### 1.1 Forschungsüberblick zur Literatur über Alvarus Thomas

Lange Zeit beschäftigte sich die Wissenschaftsgeschichte wenig mit Alvarus Thomas und dem *Liber de triplici motu*. Man findet in den grob 110 Jahren Forschung seit Pierre Duhems *Études sur Léonard de Vinci zur Geschichte der Mechanik* nur vereinzelt Artikel und kleine Abschnitte in wissenschaftshistorischen Kompendien über sein Werk und Leben. Erst in den letzten Jahren gewann Alvarus Thomas an Aktualität, als man sich in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte vermeht für die Rezeption der Oxforder Kalkulatoren interessierte, jener Gruppe von Naturphilosophen, die sich mit der Quantifizierung von Qualitäten und der Rhetorisierung der naturphilosophischen Literatur beschäftigten. Dabei sind zwei Ansätze der Literatur zu Alvarus Thomas zu unterscheiden, die sich manchmal thematisch überscheiden. Der erste Amatz, der durch Duhem eine längere Tradition aufweisen kann, untersucht die Oxforder Kalkulatoren und die durch sie begründete Tradition vor allem im Zusammenhang mit deren Bedeutung für die klassische Mechanik, vor allem in Hinsicht auf die langfristige Änderung des Bewegungsbedriftes. Dabei wird sich meist nur auf die lokale Bewegung, die *motus localis*, konzentriert. Die anderen Aspekte des aristotelischen Bewegungsbedrifts wie die generatio werden häufig ausgehändigt, weil sie nicht relevant für die Geschichte der Mechanik waren. Der andere Ansatz konzentriert sich auf die Bedeutung des *Liber de triplici motu* für die Geschichte der Mathematik.

Pionierarbeit für diese Arbeiten zur langfristigen Entwicklung der klassischen Mechanik leistete – wie eben beschrieben – Pierre Duhem mit seinem mehrbändigen Werk *Études sur Léonard de Vinci* (3 Häde, 1906-13). Ihn ging es vor allem daran, eine Traditionsinie von der mittelalterlichen Naturphilosophie bis zu Galileo aufzufragen. Er stellte Alvarus Thomas als ein Beispiel für den vererblichen Erfuss der Oxforder Kalkulatoren auf die Fragen zur Mechanik im frühen 16. Jahrhundert dar und kritisierte den *Liber de triplici motu* wegen seiner polemischeren Ausbruchswise.<fnref n="1" /> Dem folgenden weitergehende Untersuchungen von Amelise Maier (1948-53) und Marshall Clagett (1959) applied zur Naturphilosophie der Spitschlastik berichtigungswise zur „Mechanik“ des Mittelalters, die als Standardwerke zwar unverzichtbare Vorarbeiten für dieses Projekt sind, die aber Alvarus Thomas entweder nur kurz wie Clagett oder gar nicht wie Maier erwähnen.<fnref n="2" /> Eduard Grant erwähnte den Autor mehrmals in Zusammenhang mit der Rezeptionsgeschichte der Schrift *Die proportionibus proportionum* von Niccolò Oresme und hetb Alvarus Thomas unter denen hervor, die das Werk Oresmes sehr gut verstanden haben.<fnref n="3" /> Dem folgte ein Artikel von William Wallace aus dem Jahr 1969 über die Tradition der Oxforder Kalkulatoren im frühen 16. Jahrhundert, in der er viele so gut wie unbekannte Autoren aufarbeitete. Ziel von William Wallace war es, Verbindungslinien von Lehrer-Schüler-Verhältnissen

PDF-Version

<figure><img src="image_49.png" /></figure>

Edition Open Sources

Home

Sources

Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber ...*

Alvarus Thomas und sein LI...

Vorbemerkungen

2 Alvarus Thomas und sein LI...

Support for authors

## 1 Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu*

<figure><img src="image_50.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_51.png" /></figure>

Download Chapter

### 1.1 Forschungsüberblick zur Literatur über Alvarus Thomas

Lange Zeit beschäftigte sich die Wissenschaftsgeschichte wenig mit Alvarus Thomas und dem *Liber de triplici motu*. Man findet in den grob 110 Jahren Forschung seit Pierre Duhems *Études sur Léonard de Vinci zur Geschichte der Mechanik* nur vereinzelt Artikel und kleine Abschnitte in wissenschaftshistorischen Kompendien über sein Werk und Leben. Erst in den letzten Jahren gewann Alvarus Thomas an Aktualität, als man sich in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte vermeht für die Rezeption der Oxforder Kalkulatoren interessierte, jener Gruppe von Naturphilosophen, die sich mit der Quantifizierung von Qualitäten und der Rhetorisierung der naturphilosophischen Literatur beschäftigten. Dabei sind zwei Ansätze der Literatur zu Alvarus Thomas zu unterscheiden, die sich manchmal thematisch überscheiden. Der erste Ansatz, der durch Duhem eine längere Tradition aufweisen kann, untersucht die Oxforder Kalkulatoren und die durch sie begründete Tradition vor allem im Zusammenhang mit deren Bedeutung für die klassische Mechanik, vor allem in Hinsicht auf die langfristige

Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu*

<figure><img src="image_52.png" /></figure>

Table of Contents

Vorbemerkungen

Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu: Naturphilosophie an der Pariser Artistenfakultät um 1500*

1 Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu*

Sources

## 1. Alvarus Thomas und sein *Liber de triplici motu*

### 1.1 Forschungsüberblick zur Literatur über Alvarus Thomas

Lange Zeit beschäftigte sich die Wissenschaftsgeschichte wenig mit Alvarus Thomas und dem *Liber de triplici motu*. Man findet in den grob 110 Jahren Forschung seit Pierre Duhems *Études sur Léonard de Vinci zur Geschichte der Mechanik* nur vereinzelt Artikel und kleine Abschnitte in wissenschaftshistorischen Kompendien über sein Werk und Leben. Erst in den letzten Jahren gewann Alvarus Thomas an

Seite 10 von 649

kobo

Snapshot of Edition Open Sources

EPUB-Version

<footnote n="1">¹Duhem 1913 (Neudruck 1984), S. 531-543.</footnote>

<footnote n="2">²Vig Clagett 1959 (3. Neudruck 1979), S. 657f. Maier 1949-58. Maier Untersuchungszeitraum endete ca. 1450. Dauer ist es verständlich, dass sie Alvarus Thomas nicht erwähnt.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Oresme 1966, S. 71.</footnote>
HS 0106 (size: 94.20MB) (Download - meshlabJS)

<figure><img src="image_53.png" /></figure>

Maße:74,0 X 46,0 X 22,0

Bibl.: Unp.

Die Qualität der Ansicht der Scans im Browser ist häufig ungenügend. Zum besseren lesen empfiebt sich der Download und eine Anasicht z.B. mit MeshLab (externer Link).

<figure><img src="image_54.png" /></figure>

PointSize:1.00

<figure><img src="image_55.png" /></figure>

help

<figure><img src="image_56.png" /></figure>

3D-Scan, screenshot of [Clay Tablet HS0106](https://www.claytablet.com/hs0106)

<figure><img src="image_57.png" /></figure>
List of
thumbnail

<figure><img src="image_58.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_59.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_60.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_61.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_62.png" /></figure>

Impressum

<figure><img src="image_63.png" /></figure>

zoom in

<figure><img src="image_64.png" /></figure>

zoom out

<figure><img src="image_65.png" /></figure>

zoom

area

<figure><img src="image_66.png" /></figure>

full page

<figure><img src="image_67.png" /></figure>

page

width

<figure><img src="image_68.png" /></figure>

set mark

<figure><img src="image_69.png" /></figure>

remove

mark

http: get

reference

<figure><img src="image_70.png" /></figure>

digilib
<figure><img src="image_71.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_72.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_73.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_74.png" /></figure>

### 3.1.2.2 Visualization

In a second step all the results will be visualized. The fit values (red points) of the reflected sun light as well as a table with all measured values

#### # visualize results

plot, table, dfit = astrolib.Plot(xval, ydiff, report, 'hour angles fitted from vertical lines')

plot

show()

table

<figure><img src="image_75.png" /></figure>

<table><thead><tr><th>input parameter(s)</th><th>value(s)</th><th>data parameter(s)</th><th>value(s)</th><th>fit parameters(s)</th><th>value(s)</th><th>standard error</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0</td><td>x<sub>0</sub></td><td>2.423m</td><td>lines/points</td><td>h9</td><td>ν</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>

#### Contents [-] v n t

1. Import libraries, functions, data

2. Model of Copernicus heliograph

2.1. Parameter

2.1.1 Best fit

2.2. Modelling the lines of the

2.3. Model for fitting

2.4. Data selection

3. Modelling scenarios

3.1. Azimuth orientation of the

3.1.1 Assumptions

3.1.2. Computation

3.1.2.1 Model

3.1.2.2. Visualization

3.1.3. Result

3.2. Position of mirror using line

3.2.1 Assumptions

3.2.2. Computation

3.2.2.1 Model

3.2.2.2. Visualization

3.2.3. Result
# New way for scientific communication:
the PARTHENOS Hub

* Combining traditional and new approaches to publishing

* Articles, documents, papers

* Posts in blogs and scientific social networks are fixed by storing them in a repository

* The Hub offers a platform for a (moderated) scientific discussion

<figure><img src="image_76.png" /></figure>
And you?

* If you do not see the poll, please exit the full screen

<figure><img src="image_77.png" /></figure>
# Meaningful Impact Measures

<figure><img src="image_78.png" /></figure>
Traditionally impact of scholarly work is
determined by

• Number of publications,

• Number of first authorships,

• Number of citation,

• Amount of third party funding,

• Number of PhD students,

• ...

<figure><img src="image_79.png" /></figure>
# Why impact?

* What value does your research provide for the scientific community? For the society? In areas different from research?

* How is your research impacting practices in the Humanities and beyond?

<figure><img src="image_80.png" /></figure>
Understanding impact and the areas in which you can have impact will

* Increase visibility and transparency or your research results

* Enable you to communicate benefits of your research to potential researchers, funding agencies & other stakeholders

* Strengthen the influence of digital research in the Humanities.

<figure><img src="image_81.png" /></figure>
Understanding impact

<figure><img src="image_82.png" /></figure>

<figure><img src="image_83.png" /></figure>
We gathered impact factors and success criteria

* from literature and stakeholder surveys

* defined 21 impact areas, and

* (a) corresponding success factors which **influence** change in these areas

* (b) criteria which **measure** changes in the selected impact area.

* Impactomatrix is hosted on Github:
  https://dariah-de.github.io/Impactomatrix/
If you publish & disseminate your results

* Use Impactomatrix as a starting point for your publication and dissemination strategy

* Identify in which **areas** you want to have impact

* Choose **factors** that influence change in these areas

* Criteria can give you an idea how change can be measured and be communciated to stakeholders

<figure><img src="image_84.png" /></figure>
# Example: visualization tool

## Factors

* Open-source (offer)

* Providing information and outcomes

* Dissemination of data

* Conservation of data

* Data management

* Documentation of functionalities

* Documentation of code

* Embedding of available digital databases/software/tools

* User involvement

* Interoperability with other tools

* Interoperability with digital resources

* Workflow management

* Measures for long-term use & storage

* Re-usability of infrastructure

* Scalability & modularity

* Technical support

* Support of open file formats

* Usage & support of standards

## Sustainability

## Criteria

* Publication of data

* Documentation (quality & extent)

* Costs for resources (negative growths)

* Usage of provided results

* Usage of integrated databases/software/tools

* Use of (used) standards

* Re-use of code (e.g. github forks)

* Support of open data formats
# Sustainability

<figure><img src="image_85.png" /></figure>

- Open Source

- Documentation of functionalities and code

- Scalability & modularity

- Support of open file formats

- Re-use of code (Github forks)

- Support of open data formats

- Quality and extent of documentation

Use it to write funding applications!

<figure><img src="image_86.png" /></figure>
## 3 Takeaways

1. How, when and what we publish changes

2. New and enhanced publication forms require new dissemination strategies

3. Understanding the impact of your research output will increase your visibility & success

<figure><img src="image_87.png" /></figure>
Interested in impact?

* Join us in Berlin for the DARIAH-EU impact workshop

* June 21-22, 2018, at Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

* Participation is free of charge

* More info:
  https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/forschung/information_retrieval/projekte-aktivitaeten/workshop-dariah-eu

<figure><img src="image_88.png" /></figure>
Questions & Answers

<figure><img src="image_89.png" /><figcaption>(Picture CCO https://pixabay.com/photo-2999583/)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_90.png" /></figure>

Unless otherwise stated this work is licensed under a [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
# Announcements

* Next PARTHENOS webinars:

* "Collaboration with eHumanities and eHeritage Research Infrastructures: The Devil is in the Details" (Marie Puren, Klaus Illmayer), 13.02.2018, 11:00 CET

* "Research Infrastructures: Beyond tools – General introduction" (Steven Krauwer, Stefan Schmunk), 22.02.2018, 11:00 CET

* Launch of **new submodules about impact & outreach** on PARTHENOS Training Suite (soon)

* **PARTHENOS Webinar Workshop** at the European Summer University in Digital Humanities 2018 (ESU), Leipzig

<figure><img src="image_91.png" /></figure>
Thank you for joining us!

✓ Please help us improving the PARTHENOS Webinar Series and fill out the short Feedback Survey that we'll sent you in a follow-up e-mail.

<figure><img src="image_92.png" /></figure>

(Picture: CCO https://pixabay.com/photo-1889007/)
PARTHENOS eHumanities and eHeritage Webinar Series

Moderation and
Contact:

Dr Ulrike Wuttke
(University of Applied
Sciences Potsdam)

wuttke@fh-potsdam.de

Twitter: @UWuttke

www.parthenos-

project.eu

www.fh-potsdam.de

<figure><img src="image_93.png" /></figure>

Join the conversation on Twitter: :
#PARTHENOSWebinar r

@Parthenos_EU