# First JWST spectrum of distant activity in long-period comet C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)

Colin Snodgrass, Carrie E Holt, Michael S P Kelley, Cyrielle Opitom, Aurélie Guilbert-Lepoutre, Matthew M Knight, Rosita Kokotanekova, Emmanuel Jehin, Elena Mazzotta Epifani, Alessandra Migliorini, et al.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Colin Snodgrass, Carrie E Holt, Michael S P Kelley, Cyrielle Opitom, Aurélie Guilbert-Lepoutre, et al. First JWST spectrum of distant activity in long-period comet C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 2025, 541 (1), pp.L8-L13. 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf046. hal-05353635

HAL Id: hal-05353635

https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-05353635v1

Submitted on 7 Nov 2025

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

# First JWST spectrum of distant activity in long-period comet C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)

Colin Snodgrass<sup>1,1*</sup> Carrie E. Holt,<sup>2</sup> Michael S. P. Kelley,<sup>3</sup> Cyrielle Opitom,<sup>1</sup>

Aurélie Guilbert-Lepoutre,<sup>4</sup> Matthew M. Knight<sup>1,5</sup> Rosita Kokotanekova,<sup>6,7</sup> Emmanuel Jehin,<sup>8</sup>

Elena Mazzotta Epifani,<sup>9</sup> Alessandra Migliorini<sup>10</sup> Cecilia Tubiana<sup>10</sup> Marco Micheli<sup>11</sup> and
Davide Farnocchia<sup>12</sup>

Accepted 2025 April 30. Received 2025 April 17; in original form 2025 February 12

## ABSTRACT

We observed the new long-period comet C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos), inbound at 7 au from the Sun, using the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) integral field unit on JWST. The spectrum shows absorption features due to water ice in the coma and evidence for CO₂ driven activity, with a production rate of Q(CO₂) = 2.546 ± 0.019 × 10²<fnref n="5" /> molecules s⁻<fnref n="1" />, and no emission features of water or CO. The latter is surprising, given that CO is more volatile than CO₂, and suggests that this comet may have lost its near-surface CO during its early evolution, before implantation in the Oort cloud.

**Key words:** techniques: spectroscopic – comets: individual: C/2024 E1.

## 1 INTRODUCTION

Historically, long-period comets (LPCs) have been seen as short-lived phenomena – temporary visitors to our skies observed for a few months only, as they pass close to the Sun and put on a show of activity that is primarily driven by sublimation of water ice, before returning to the outer reaches of our Solar system and being lost from view. Over the past decade or so, modern sky surveys increasingly discover LPCs at larger distances from the Sun (Lister et al. 2022). Activity is now regularly observed at heliocentric distance $r_h > 5$ au (e.g. Mazzotta Epifani, Palumbo & Colangeli 2009; Meech et al. 2009; Rousselot et al. 2014; Holt et al. 2024). At these distances, temperatures are low enough that water ice does not sublimate efficiently and more volatile species, such as CO or CO₂, are likely activity drivers (e.g. Meech & Svoren 2004). A handful of exceptional comets have been observed to be active at distances beyond 20 au from the Sun, such as C/2010 U3 (Boattini), which was active at 25.8 au (Hui, Farnocchia & Micheli 2019), C/2017 K2 (Pan-STARRS) at 23.7 au (Hui, Jewitt & Clark 2018; Jewitt et al. 2021), C/2014 UN271

(Bernardinelli–Bernstein) at 26 au (Farnham, Kelley & Bauer 2021), and C/2019 E3 (ATLAS) at 23 au (Hui et al. 2024). Discovery at such large distances allows study of their evolving activity drivers with changing $r_h$, although direct observation of the expected activity drivers for comets (H₂O, CO, or CO₂) remains challenging, as the Earth’s atmosphere prevents observations of these species’ infrared emission features from the ground.

Discovery of LPCs at large distance also greatly increases the time over which these comets can potentially be observed, from months to years, and opens the possibility of sending a space mission to encounter one. This is what the European Space Agency (ESA)’s *Comet Interceptor* (CI) mission will do in the first half of the next decade; the expected increase in discovery rate of LPCs at large distance with the beginning of the Vera C. Rubin observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time (Ivezić et al. 2019) will mean that a spacecraft waiting in space could be directed towards an LPC fly-by with a few years warning time (Snodgrass & Jones 2019; Jones et al. 2024). However, not all LPCs are reachable by this mission; due to spacecraft constraints, it will need to encounter its comet close to $r_h = 1$ au, and many of the LPCs discovered at large distances do not get that close to the Sun – C/2014 UN271, for example, will approach

<footnote n="1"><sup>1</sup>Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK</footnote>

<footnote n="2"><sup>2</sup>Las Cumbres Observatory, 6740 Cortona Drive Suite 102, Goleta, CA 93117, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="3"><sup>3</sup>Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="4"><sup>4</sup>LGL-TPE, UMR 5276 CNRS, Université Lyon 1, ENS, 69622 Villeurbanne, France</footnote>

<footnote n="5"><sup>5</sup>Physics Department, United States Naval Academy, 572C Holloway Road, Annapolis, MD 21402, USA</footnote>

<footnote n="6"><sup>6</sup>Institute of Astronomy and National Astronomical Observatory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72 Tsarigradsko Shose Boulevard, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria</footnote>

<footnote n="7"><sup>7</sup>International Space Science Institute, Hallerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland</footnote>

<footnote n="8"><sup>8</sup>STAR Institute, University of Liège, Allée du 6 août, 19, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium</footnote>

<footnote n="9"><sup>9</sup>INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00040, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="10"><sup>10</sup>Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology, IAPS-INAF, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="11"><sup>11</sup>ESA NEO Coordination Centre, Largo Galileo Galilei, 1, I-00044 Frascati (RM), Italy</footnote>

<footnote n="12"><sup>12</sup>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA</footnote>

<footnote>*E-mail: csn@roe.ac.uk</footnote>
no closer than the orbit of Saturn. A suitable mission target will be one discovered at large $r_h$ but with perihelion inside of $r_h = 1.2$ au (among other constraints; Sánchez et al. 2021).

C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos), hereafter E1, was discovered by the Catalina sky survey in March 2024 at $r_h = 8$ au (Wierzchos et al. 2024) and will have its perihelion passage at 0.6 au in January 2026. While this will be before CI will be operating, this comet presents an excellent opportunity to study how the activity drivers of such comets evolve as they approach the Sun. Understanding the behaviour of comets similar to the expected CI target is of high priority for mission success. From a mission planning point of view, it is essential to be able to predict the activity level and expected production rates close to perihelion based on distant observations. On the other hand, having a detailed understanding of the range of properties and activity patterns observed among LPCs is necessary to put CI's measurements of an individual object into the larger context of the population. E1 was the first comet with such an orbit to be discovered at such extreme distance during the JWST era, and since ESA selected the CI mission in 2019, giving us an excellent opportunity to learn about cometary evolution over relevant distances before the mission launches.

JWST promises to be a revolutionary facility in the study of comets (Kelley et al. 2016). As a space telescope with a wavelength range (for the Near-Infrared Spectrograph, NIRSpec) covering the 1–5 micron infrared range, it is sensitive to emission features of all major drivers of cometary activity ($H_2O$, CO, and $CO_2$) and many of the other minor species that are expected to sublimate directly from ices (as opposed to the gas species observed in the ultraviolet/visible region, which are mostly the products of photodissociation in the coma; e.g. Bodewits et al. 2024). The NIRSpec integral-field-unit (IFU) mode allows not only the detection of these species, but mapping of their spatial distribution, which has revealed heterogeneous outgassing in the coma of comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1 (Faggi et al. 2024). JWST's sensitivity is opening a new window on distant or weak cometary activity, and it has already provided the first direct evidence for water ice sublimation driven activity in Main Belt Comets (Kelley et al. 2023; Hsieh et al. 2025) and $CO_2$ and methane emissions in Centaurs (Harrington Pinto et al. 2023; Pinilla-Alonso et al. 2024).

In this letter, we present the first JWST spectrum of an LPC beyond the water ice sublimation region. These results are from the first of three epochs approved in our JWST programme, obtained when the comet was at 7 au from the Sun; we will observe E1 two more times in 2025, covering the full range of its pre-perihelion visibility from JWST at approximately 5 and 3 au, and, in a future work, will study how its spectrum and activity pattern evolve as the comet crosses the water ice line.

## 2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION

We observed the comet using JWST/NIRSpec (Jakobsen et al. 2022) in IFU prism mode, covering the full wavelength range 0.6–5.3 µm at low resolution ($R \approx 30–300$, variable with wavelength). Observations were performed on 2024 June 14 around 21:00 UT, when the comet was at 7.2 au from the Sun, with a distance of 7.0 au and a phase angle of 8.2° from JWST. At this time, ground-based observations by our team using the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope network, and Transiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope (TRAPPIST) telescopes showed a faint and condensed coma with a total *r*-band magnitude of 19.7, solar-like colour, and $Af\rho \approx 300$ cm. Details of ground-based observations of E1, including longer term monitoring and multifilter photometry, will be published in future papers. For our JWST/NIRSpec observations, we used the NRSIRS2RAPID readout

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 1.** Spectrum extracted within a 0.4 arcsec radius aperture centred on the nucleus.</figcaption></figure>

mode with 50 groups per integration, 2 integrations per exposure, and a 4-point dither pattern that kept the comet within the 3 arcsec field of view of the IFU, resulting in a total exposure time of 5952 s. We also obtained an offset sky observation 5 arcmin from the comet, as the comet was expected to fill the IFU field of view.

The uncalibrated data were downloaded from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes and processed using version 1.16.1 of the JWST Science Calibration Pipeline with JWST Calibration Reference Data System context file 1321. The background sky exposures were subtracted from the exposures of the comet. The four comet exposures were then combined by resampling the dithered observations to create a $53 \times 51 \times 941$ pixel data cube. A comet spectrum was extracted using a 0.4 arcsec (~2000 km) radius aperture centred on the brightest point (assumed to coincide with the nucleus).

## 3 RESULTS

### 3.1 Spectrum

In Fig. 1, we show the extracted spectrum of the comet. The most prominent features are labelled: these are a broad absorption around 3 µm attributed to water ice grains, and a strong emission from $CO_2$ at 4.3 µm. Emission from water (2.69 µm) or CO gas (4.67 µm) is notably absent. The appearance of the Fresnel peak in the centre of the water ice band at around 3.1 µm indicates that the ice is crystalline (e.g. Mastrapa et al. 2009). There are also weaker absorption features visible at 1.5, 2, and 4.5 µm that can be attributed to water ice (Mastrapa, Grundy & Gudipati 2013), which are more easily seen in Fig. 2, which shows the reflectance spectrum obtained by dividing Fig. 1 by the spectrum of the G-type solar analogue star SNAP-2 (Program #1128; PI: N. Luetzgendorf; publicly available data).

In order to quantify the $CO_2$ production rate, we performed a retrieval of the extracted spectrum (Fig. 1) using the Planetary Spectrum Generator (PSG; Villanueva et al. 2018). We focused the retrieval on the $CO_2 \nu_3$ band at 4.26 µm by subtracting a continuum modelled using a polynomial fit and limiting the spectral range to 4.1–4.4 µm. The best fit from the PSG resulted in a derived production rate of $Q(CO_2) = 2.546 \pm 0.019 \times 10^{25}$ molecules s⁻¹. We fitted coma temperature as a free parameter and a rotational temperature of
L10 C. Snodgrass et al.

<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 2.** Reflectance spectrum within the same photometric aperture as in Fig. 1.</figcaption></figure>

59.0 ± 0.9 K was derived to match the shape of the emission band. The best-fitting fluorescence model is shown in Fig. 3.

Fluorescence emission from the H₂O *ν*₃ band at 2.69 µm and the CO 1→0 band at 4.67 µm may be used to estimate upper limit production rates for these species. The PSG was once again used to generate model spectra, using the same coma expansion speed as for the CO₂ coma. To fit the data, additional considerations were taken to account for correlated noise in the IFU data, similar to the approaches previously used with NIRSpec Prism observations of comets 238P and 358P (Kelley et al. 2023; Hsieh et al. 2025). To that end, a three-component model was used, including (1) the spectrum of the gas being tested; (2) a polynomial model for the continuum (first-order for CO and second-order for H₂O); and (3) a two-parameter model to describe the correlation between data points. Gaussian process regression and a Markov chain Monte Carlo technique are used to model the spectrum and parameter uncertainties.

An assumption on the rotational temperature is also needed to derive an upper limit. The CO₂ molecule lacks a dipole moment (0.000 debye; Nelson, Lide & Maryott 1967), and its rotational temperature is expected to remain constant with increasing distance outside of the molecular collisional zone near the nucleus (<<100 km). CO has a weak dipole moment (0.112 debye; Nelson et al. 1967), so we assume the same rotational temperature as measured for CO₂. H₂O has a significantly stronger dipole (1.857 debye; Shostak, Ebenstein & Muenter 1991); therefore, we assume the PSG's default temperature at 7.2 au: 8.4 K. Given these assumptions, the best-fitting 99.7 per cent confidence limits (equivalent to 3σ) are 2.1 × 10²⁴ and 8.1 × 10²⁴ molecules s⁻¹, for H₂O and CO, respectively (Fig. 3).

Our measurement of the CO₂ production rate and limits on the other major species allow us to put limits on abundance ratios. The limit on CO₂/H₂O > 12 is in line with the general trend for other comets (Harrington Pinto et al. 2022) as water ice sublimation becomes inefficient with increasing heliocentric distance (Meech & Svoren 2004). The CO/CO₂ < 32 per cent ratio is not unusual, although still an outlier in the survey by Harrington Pinto et al. (2022), who found a general trend of increasing CO/CO₂ with heliocentric distance, and observed only CO-dominated comets beyond 3.5 au, based on observations of four comets.

## 3.2 Spatial distribution

The observations were designed to use NIRSpec IFU mode so that we could also investigate the spatial distribution of the dust, ice, and gas in the comet's coma. Figure 4 shows maps derived using different methods for each spectral feature. The dust image was constructed using the average flux value of the dust continuum in the wavelength range 0.7-2.5 µm. The water ice absorption map was generated by calculating the depth of the 3.0 µm absorption band, defined as the difference between the average band flux from 2.95 to 3.05 µm and a linearly interpolated continuum after dividing the spectrum by the same solar analogue spectrum used to create Fig. 2. The CO₂ emission map was produced by integrating the continuum-subtracted flux over the 4.22-4.31 µm wavelength range.

The dust and ice images both show an asymmetric coma extending in the antisolar direction, and have a similar distribution, indicating that the ice detected consists of icy grains in the coma. The CO₂ emission has a much more symmetric distribution. The lower panels in Fig. 4 show the images enhanced by division by a 1/ρ radial profile (i.e. the theoretical profile of a freely expanding coma), which helps identify spatial asymmetries in the coma. The gas profile is highly symmetric and distinct from the dust and ice. The latter show some evidence for a spiral pattern with material leaving towards the west and curving clockwise towards the tail. The similarity between the dust and water ice distributions is also seen in Fig. 5, which shows radial profiles along the Sun-anti-Sun line for the three maps. The CO₂ gas coma is also seen to be more symmetrical either side of the nucleus in this plot.

We extracted a J-band image by integrating over the spectral dimension after weighting the data cube by the J-bandpass curve (1.15-1.33 µm). We then measured the flux in this image within a 0.26 arcsec (1.5× the point spread function full width at half-maximum) radius aperture centred on the nucleus, to obtain a limit of the nucleus size from the possible contribution of a point source to the inner coma. We find an upper limit of 13.7 km for the nucleus radius, assuming a typical cometary linear phase function with a slope of 0.047 mag degree⁻¹ and 4 per cent albedo in the visible (Knight, Kokotanekova & Samarasinha 2024), which corresponds to a 6 per cent albedo in the J band assuming a 10 per cent/100 nm spectral slope between the visible and near-infrared.

## 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Considering the gas coma, the lack of water emission at 7 au was expected, but the apparent lack of CO in this comet is surprising. Previous surveys of CO versus CO₂ activity have found that distant comets (beyond 3.5 au) have CO-dominated activity (Harrington Pinto et al. 2022). JWST observations of 29P revealed both CO and CO₂ at 6 au from the Sun, with a global production rate ratio of CO/CO₂ = 70 (Faggi et al. 2024). 29P is a Centaur and in the process of transitioning to a Jupiter family comet orbit – its orbit is relatively circular near 6 au and it is observed to be constantly active, with regular large-scale outbursts (Miles et al. 2016), so it has clearly been processed by activity in some way. Naively, one might expect 29P to be less likely to retain hyper-volatiles such as CO, compared with a new LPC such as E1, whose activity has presumably only started very recently as it approaches the Sun. Faggi et al. (2024) also observe significant spatial structure in the emission of CO and CO₂ in 29P. Their coma model indicates three distinct regions of activity with local CO-to-CO₂ ratios ranging from 0 to 260, implying heterogeneity of the (near-)surface ices driving this activity. This could be explained by the evolution of 29P's nucleus
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 3.** Zoom in on the expected gas emission bands, showing the models used to derive the CO₂ production rate and upper limits for H₂O and CO.</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 4.** Images of the comet created from IFU cubes that cover reflected continuum (i.e. dust) over 0.7–2.5 µm (left), water ice absorption depth (3 µm; centre), and CO₂ emission (4.22–4.31 µm; right). The lower row shows the same images enhanced by dividing by a 1/ρ profile to reveal asymmetries.</figcaption></figure>

during its prolonged period of violent activity in its current orbit. In this sense, the lack of structure in the outgassing in E1 makes sense – a new comet could be expected to be more uniformly active across its surface.

The lack of CO emission in the JWST spectrum suggests that CO is not readily available in the nucleus layer that is currently driving the activity of E1. This could be because CO was not incorporated in the bulk material, but it is more likely that it has been locally depleted due to alteration of superficial material. In the Oort cloud, comet nuclei are subject to irradiation by energetic particles such as cosmic rays, which could produce a volatile-depleted and hardened superficial crust of several metres (Stern & Shull 1988; Stern 2003). Before comet nuclei are stored in the Oort cloud, they were formed closer to the Sun where thermal processing could have led to some hyper-volatile loss. Lisse et al. (2022) predicted a complete loss of all CO not trapped in a more refractory ice in Oort cloud comets.

However, they assumed that the ejection process would start after hundreds of Myr, when there is strong evidence that the giant planet instability triggering the outward ejection of planetesimals occurred quite rapidly (Nesvorný et al. 2018). Davidsson (2021) suggested that CO would be completely lost for all small nuclei, but noted a prolonged time-scale for CO loss in larger objects. This implies that the timing of the orbital evolution leading to the implantation of comet nuclei in the Oort cloud with respect to the giant planet instability could play a critical role in the survival of CO. Indeed, Gkotsinas et al. (2024) confirm that Oort cloud comets are relatively protected from stringent thermal processing as a result of a quick outward scattering after the giant planet instability, with ~60 per cent of the Oort cloud nuclei retaining some of their pure condensed CO ice. Overall, thermal processing sustained before E1’s nucleus was ejected towards the Oort cloud could explain why CO appears depleted now that it is returning to the inner Solar system.
<figure><img src="image_8.png" /><figcaption>**Figure 5.** The solar/antisolar radial profile of the coma from the three spectral regions shown in Fig. 4.</figcaption></figure>

We note that a variety of thermal processing outcomes is none the less observed by Gkotsinas et al. (2024), as it is tightly linked with the unique dynamical path followed by each nucleus on its way to the Oort cloud. Indeed, the authors suggest that nuclei implanted beyond the Oort spike (that would typically be categorized as dynamically new comets when they return) are more processed in terms of CO content than those implanted closer to the Sun (which would more likely be labelled as returning comets even on their first journey back). At first glance, this could explain why some dynamically new comets tend to be less CO-dominated than returning comets (A’Hearn et al. 2012; Harrington Pinto et al. 2022), and a possible explanation for the lack of CO in E1. Monitoring the activity pattern and the emission of hyper-volatiles in the coming months with our second and third JWST epochs will help understand whether CO can be mobilized from the subsurface material, which in turn will help better understand the early phases of that comet formation and evolution. Moreover, a sample of LPCs observed with JWST at different heliocentric distances would be beneficial to reduce the influence of individual comets’ orbits and histories in order to test the hypotheses for different volatile compositions of different comet populations. Finally, detailed dynamical studies of E1’s orbit similar to those in the Catalogue of Cometary Orbits and their Dynamical Evolution (CODE) data base (Królikowska & Dybczyński 2020) and based on astrometric observations obtained throughout its orbit will help to define the recent orbital history and the possibility of previous perihelia warm enough for CO sublimation.

Turning to the absorption features, the 3 µm water ice band, and in particular the Fresnel peak, is qualitatively similar in appearance to those of the water-dominated trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) and inactive Centaurs observed with JWST as part of the large sample ‘Discovering the Surface Compositions of trans-Neptunian Objects (DiSCo-TNOs)’ programme (De Prá et al. 2025; Licandro et al. 2025; Pinilla-Alonso et al. 2025). The Fresnel peak is not seen in JWST spectra of active Centaurs such as 39P (Harrington Pinto et al. 2023) or 29P (Faggi et al. 2024). The DiSCo TNOs and Centaurs are not active bodies, and are likely larger. They show surface crystalline water ice, while our IFU spatial observations show that the water ice in E1 is on coma particles. Neither the water-dominated TNOs/Centaurs nor E1 show CO ice absorption features, while other

DiSCo targets do (Pinilla-Alonso et al. 2025), but, as noted above, surface CO is expected to be lost due to thermal evolution, so we cannot conclude that the comet or the TNOs/Centaurs lack CO in their interiors based on their icy coma particle or surface composition alone, and we may yet see CO emission from E1 as the comet gets closer to the Sun.

The Fresnel peak is characteristic of crystalline water ice and arises when a transition between volume and surface scattering occurs, possibly suggesting that the icy coma particles are large (relative to the few micron wavelength). Detailed spectral modelling for E1 is beyond the scope of this letter, but comparison with modelling of the two water-dominated inactive Centaurs by Licandro et al. (2025) could be informative: The presence of CO₂ ice in absorption in the Centaur spectra (the CO₂ fundamental band at 4.27 µm) suggests that the surface is likely composed of about 50 per cent ices (water and CO₂), about 30 per cent silicates, and 10–20 per cent of complex organics. CO₂ and water are suggested to be in intimate mixture: if this is also the case for the (sub)surface active layer of E1, that would be consistent with the release of water and dust grains as CO₂ sublimates, and support the idea that Oort cloud comets and Centaurs formed in the same region (e.g. Nesvorný et al. 2018; Gkotsinas et al. 2024). With the caveat that we observe the coma rather than the surface, comparison between the comet and the JWST-observed Centaurs samples the effects of different nucleus size and different orbital evolution for bodies from the same part of the disc.

Assuming that the solar energy input is distributed between thermal re-radiation and sublimation of CO₂, we find an equilibrium temperature $T_{eq} = 98$ K and a CO₂ production rate of $4.7 \times 10^{20}$ molecules m⁻² s⁻¹ at 7 au. With our measured $Q(\text{CO}_2) = 2.546 \pm 0.019 \times 10^{25}$ molecules s⁻¹, this implies a small active area, with radius ~130 m, or 0.01 per cent of the surface if the nucleus is as large as our radius ~13.7 km limit – this is in agreement with the relatively small $Af\rho$ measured from the ground. As the comet approaches the Sun, we can expect an increase in activity levels as other areas become active and/or other species start to sublimate, although the rate of brightening varies significantly between comets (Holt et al. 2024). Deeper thermal wave propagation, seasonal effects, or removal of a mantled layer could result in a significant increase in gas activity above that predicted by extrapolation of this current production rate. We expect that the Fresnel peak, and then the whole 3 µm feature, will eventually disappear from the spectrum as water ice starts to sublimate, similar to the Centaurs and comets observed closer to the Sun (Protopapa et al. 2018, 2021, 2022; Harrington Pinto et al. 2023; Faggi et al. 2024). Protopapa et al. (2018) showed that the physical extent of the icy grain halo decreases with decreasing heliocentric distance. NIRSpec IFU provides the first opportunity to test this at meaningfully different heliocentric distances. Whether or not CO or other highly volatile species will be seen, if they are present at depths below the surface that will eventually be heated, is more difficult to predict. Studying whether or not they are present, and also the spatial distribution within the coma if they are seen, will give important clues as to where they could be within the nucleus, which will constrain evolution models. These species could be released from amorphous water ice if there is any, or from within CO₂ ice (Davidsson 2021), so spatial correlation between ices and gas will be important to investigate. This work presents results from the first of three JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations of this comet, at distances (7, 5, and 3 au) bracketing the expected start of water ice sublimation, and we look forward to [in detailed follow-up paper(s)] to following its evolution to test these ideas.
## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the anonymous referee for helpful suggestions that improved this letter. This work is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA/CSA JWST. The data were obtained from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-03127 for JWST. These observations are associated with JWST Director's Discretionary Program GO-06714.

CS acknowledges support from the United Kingdom Space Agency. Support for this work was provided to CEH, MSPK, and MMK by National Aeronautics and Space Administration through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract NAS 5-26555. RK acknowledges partial support by grant: КП-06-H88/5 'Physical properties and chemical composition of asteroids and comets - a key to increasing our knowledge of the Solar system origin and evolution' by the Bulgarian National Science Fund. AG-L acknowledges support by Centre national d'études spatiales (mission Comet Interceptor). TRAPPIST is funded by the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (Fond National de la Recherche Scientifique, FNRS) under the grant PDR T.0120.21. EJ is an FRS-FNRS Research Director. DF conducted this research at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). This work was supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, through ISSI International Team project 504 'The Life Cycle of Comets'.

## DATA AVAILABILITY

All JWST data are available through the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at the Space Telescope Science Institute, and directly via https://doi.org/10.17909/7wnt-k845.

## REFERENCES

* A'Hearn M. F. et al., 2012, ApJ, 758, 29

* Bodewits D., Bonev B. P., Cordiner M. A., Villanueva G. L., 2024, in Meech K. J., Combi M. R., Bockelée-Morvan D., Raymond S. N., Zolensky M. E., eds, Comets III. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, p. 407

* Davidsson B. J. R., 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5654

* De Prá M. N. et al., 2025, Nat. Astron., 9, 252

* Faggi S. et al., 2024, Nat. Astron., 8, 1237

* Farnham T. L., Kelley M. S. P., Bauer J. M., 2021, Planet. Sci. J., 2, 236

* Gkotsinas A., Nesvorný D., Guilbert-Lepoutre A., Raymond S. N., Kaib N., 2024, Planet. Sci. J., 5, 243

* Harrington Pinto O., Womack M., Fernandez Y., Bauer J., 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 247

* Harrington Pinto O. et al., 2023, Planet. Sci. J., 4, 208

* Holt C. E. et al., 2024, Planet. Sci. J., 5, 273

* Hsieh H. H. et al., 2025, Planet. Sci. J., 6, 3

* Hui M.-T., Jewitt D., Clark D., 2018, AJ, 155, 25

* Hui M.-T., Farnocchia D., Micheli M., 2019, AJ, 157, 162

* Hui M.-T., Weryk R., Micheli M., Huang Z., Wainscoat R., 2024, AJ, 167, 140

* Ivezić Ž. et al., 2019, ApJ, 873, 111

* Jakobsen P. et al., 2022, A&A, 661, A80

* Jewitt D., Kim Y., Mutchler M., Agarwal J., Li J., Weaver H., 2021, AJ, 161, 188

* Jones G. H. et al., 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 9

* Kelley M. S. P. et al., 2016, PASP, 128, 018009

* Kelley M. S. P., Hsieh H. H., Bodewits D., Saki M., Villanueva G. L., Milam S. N., Hammel H. B., 2023, Nature, 619, 720

* Knight M. M., Kokotanekova R., Samarasinha N. H., 2024, in Meech K. J., Combi M. R., Bockelée-Morvan D., Raymond S. N., Zolensky M. E., eds, Comets III. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, p. 361

* Królikowska M., Dybczyński P. A., 2020, A&A, 640, A97

* Licandro J. et al., 2025, Nat. Astron., 9, 245

* Lisse C. M. et al., 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 112

* Lister T. et al., 2022, Planet. Sci. J., 3, 173

* Mastrapa R. M., Sandford S. A., Roush T. L., Cruikshank D. P., Dalle Ore C. M., 2009, ApJ, 701, 1347

* Mastrapa R. M. E., Grundy W. M., Gudipati M. S., 2013, in Gudipati M. S., Castillo-Rogez J., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 356, The Science of Solar System Ices. Springer, New York, NY, p. 371

* Mazzotta Epifani E., Palumbo P., Colangeli L., 2009, A&A, 508, 1031

* Meech K. J., Svoren J., 2004, in Festou M. C., Keller H. U., Weaver H. A., eds, Comets II. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, p. 317

* Meech K. J. et al., 2009, Icarus, 201, 719

* Miles R., Faillace G. A., Mottola S., Raab H., Roche P., Soulier J.-F., Watkins A., 2016, Icarus, 272, 327

* Nelson R. D., Lide D. R., Maryott A. A., 1967, Selected Values of Electric Dipole Moments for Molecules in the Gas Phase. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nbs.nsrds.10

* Nesvorný D., Vokrouhlický D., Bottke W. F., Levison H. F., 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 878

* Pinilla-Alonso N. et al., 2024, A&A, 692, L11

* Pinilla-Alonso N. et al., 2025, Nat. Astron., 9, 230

* Protopapa S., Kelley M. S. P., Yang B., Bauer J. M., Kolokolova L., Woodward C. E., Keane J. V., Sunshine J. M., 2018, ApJ, 862, L16

* Protopapa S., Kelley M. S. P., Woodward C. E., Yang B., 2021, Planet. Sci. J., 2, 176

* Protopapa S., Kelley M., Yang B., Gustafsson A., 2022, in AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts. p. 109.04

* Rousselot P., Korsun P. P., Kulyk I. V., Afanasiev V. L., Ivanova O. V., Sergeev A. V., Velichko S. F., 2014, A&A, 571, A73

* Sánchez J. P. et al., 2021, Acta Astronaut., 188, 265

* Shostak S. L., Ebenstein W. L., Muenter J. S., 1991, J. Chem. Phys., 94, 5875

* Snodgrass C., Jones G. H., 2019, Nat. Commun., 10, 5418

* Stern S. A., 2003, Nature, 424, 639

* Stern S. A., Shull J. M., 1988, Nature, 332, 407

* Villanueva G. L., Smith M. D., Protopapa S., Faggi S., Mandell A. M., 2018, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 217, 86

* Wierzchos K. W. et al., 2024, Minor Planet Electron. Circ., 2024-E102

This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author.