# Disseminated intravascular coagulation is strongly associated with severe acute kidney injury in patients with septic shock

Julie Helms, Hamid Merdji, Sébastien Loewert, François Séverac, Alexandra Monnier, Julian Kaurin, Anais Curtiaud, Ferhat Meziani, Julien Demiselle

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

## ► To cite this version:

Julie Helms, Hamid Merdji, Sébastien Loewert, François Séverac, Alexandra Monnier, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is strongly associated with severe acute kidney injury in patients with septic shock. Annals of Intensive Care, 2023, 13 (1), pp.119. 10.1186/s13613-023-01216-8. hal-05502641

HAL Id: hal-05502641

https://univoak.hal.science/hal-05502641v1

Submitted on 10 Feb 2026

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Attribution - International License
RESEARCH

Open Access

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

Check for
updates

# Disseminated intravascular coagulation is strongly associated with severe acute kidney injury in patients with septic shock

Julie Helms¹,², Hamid Merdji¹,², Sébastien Loewert¹, François Severac³, Alexandra Monnier¹, Julian Kaurin¹, Anaïs Curtiaud¹, Ferhat Meziani¹,² and Julien Demiselle¹,²*

**Abstract**

**Background** Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) worsens the prognosis of septic shock and contributes to multiple organ failure. To date, no data linking DIC and acute kidney injury (AKI) occurrence, severity, and evolution in this setting are available. We aimed at analyzing the association between AKI occurrence, severity and evolution in patients with septic shock-induced DIC. In a prospective monocentric cohort study, consecutive patients, 18 years and older, admitted in the ICU of Strasbourg University Hospital in the setting of systemic hypotension requiring vasopressor related to an infection, without history of terminal chronic kidney disease were eligible. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO classification. DIC diagnosis was based on the International Society on Thrombo-sis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score. Evolution of AKI was evaluated through the composite endpoint of major adverse kidney events. Only patients with DIC that occurred before or at the time of AKI diagnosis were considered. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors associated with renal outcomes.

**Results** 350 patients were included, of whom 129 experienced DIC. Patients with DIC were more seriously ill (median SAPS II 64 vs. 56, *p* < 0.001), and had higher 28-day mortality (43.3% vs. 26.2%, *p* < 0.001). AKI was more frequent in patients with DIC (86.8% vs. 74.2%, *p* < 0.005), particularly for the more severe stage of AKI [KDIGO 3 in 58.1% of patients with DIC vs. 30.8% of patients without DIC, *p* < 0.001, AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 47.3% of patients with DIC vs. 21.3% of patients without DIC, *p* < 0.001]. After adjustment for confounding factors, DIC occurrence remained associated with the risk of having the more severe stage of AKI with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.74 [IC 95% (1.53–4.91), *p* < 0.001], and with the risk of requiring RRT during the ICU stay [OR 2.82 (1.53–5.2), *p* < 0.001].

**Conclusion** DIC appears to be strongly associated with the risk of developing the more severe form of AKI (stage 3 of the KDIGO classification, RRT requirement), even after adjustment for severity and other relevant factors.

**Keywords** Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Sepsis, Septic shock, Acute kidney injury, Acute kidney disease

<figure><img src="image_4.png" /></figure>

<footnote>*Correspondence:
Julien Demiselle
julien.demiselle@chru-strasbourg.fr
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article</footnote>
## Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with a higher mortality rate, with a close relationship between AKI severity and death [1, 2]. AKI has also been reported to be associated with worse long-term outcome: patients who experienced AKI during ICU stay are at higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) and major cardiovascular events [3, 4].

Beyond common factors associated with AKI in ICU, septic shock remains the main trigger of AKI [5]. However, pathophysiology of sepsis-induced AKI is complex and still poorly understood. While it certainly involves factors like inflammation, oxidative stress, microvascular dysfunction, and tubular epithelial cell insult [6, 7], disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) might also contribute to AKI development. DIC results from an excessive activation of coagulation, along with a defect in anticoagulant and fibrinolytic regulatory systems [8, 9], and thus leads to disseminated microthrombosis, which might contribute to organ dysfunction during septic shock [10, 11]. As 30–40% of patients with septic shock develop DIC, which is associated with severity and increased mortality rate [12, 13], it might be a considerable contributor to AKI development.

However, few studies investigated the association between DIC and AKI. A higher rate of AKI has been suggested in septic shock patients with DIC, but this possible association was not analyzed with adjustment of confounding variables, mainly patient severity [14, 15].

This study, therefore aimed at investigating the association between DIC and AKI among patients with septic shock with a special emphasis on AKI occurrence, severity, and evolution.

## Methods

### Design of the study

A prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2013 and March 2019, in an ICU of Strasbourg University Hospital (France).

Criteria for inclusions were patients aged 18 years and older, admitted to the ICU for septic shock according to the Sepsis-2 definition were screened. Patients had to be included in the 12 h following vasopressor initiation. Patients with moribund status at screening phase, or patients with limitation of life-sustaining therapies at admission have been excluded. Patients under legal protection (inability to provide consent, incarceration...) have been excluded. Patients already enrolled in the present study have been excluded in case of readmission, and patients who developed shock later during the ICU stay were not screened.

Furthermore, patients with a history of terminal chronic kidney disease (stage 5 of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) definition [16], under chronic renal replacement therapy or kidney transplant recipients) were excluded. To delineate the association between DIC and AKI and its severity, patients in whom DIC was diagnosed after AKI reached its higher stage were excluded.

### Data collection

The following data were prospectively recorded: age, sex, body mass index, significant medical history, and the Charlson index [17]. Acute condition was characterized by: severity with the SAPSII and SOFA scores [18, 19], hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, urine output), source of infection, nosocomial or community-acquired infections and available microbiological data were collected. We registered all the supporting therapies required during the ICU stay [mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, fluid therapy, renal replacement therapy (RRT)] and their duration. Mortality was assessed at the end of ICU and hospital stay, and at day 28.

### Definitions

* AKI occurrence and severity were defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) classification [20]. Stage 1 (KDIGO1) was considered when serum creatinine increased by at least 26 µmol/L from baseline creatinine or 1.5 to 1.9 times from the baseline creatinine, or if urine output was below 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6–12 h. Stage 2 (KDIGO2) was reached if serum creatinine increased to more than twofold from baseline or if urine output was less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for at least 12 h. Stage 3 (KDIGO 3) represented the most severe form of AKI and was defined as an increase in serum creatinine to more than threefold from baseline, or upper than 354 µmol/L, or need for RRT or urine output below 0.3 mL/kg/h for at least 24 h or anuria for at least 12 h.

* Baseline serum creatinine: for each patient, when available, pre-admission serum creatinine was considered within a time period of a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 1 year from hospital admission. If unavailable, when serum creatinine was elevated at admission, baseline serum creatinine was extrapolated using the MDRD formula [21] assuming that baseline estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) is 75 mL/min/1.73 m², as suggested by guidelines [20]. Patients were considered with CKD when baseline GFR was below 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

To describe the evolution of AKI, we collected as far as possible criteria for acute kidney disease (AKD), that was defined as a persistent AKI (stage 1 or
higher of the KDIGO classification) for more than 7 days. Furthermore, at the end of the hospital stay, criteria for the composite endpoint for Major Adverse Kidney Event (MAKE) at the end of hospitalization were collected for each patient. MAKE was defined as the composite criteria of death, need for RRT or worsened kidney function (a twofold increase in serum creatinine level from baseline) at the end of hospital stay [22].

* DIC diagnosis was based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score [23], and, accordingly, a score upper or equal to 5 was retained for the diagnosis of DIC. Biological tests for the diagnosis of DIC were performed at ICU admission and on a daily basis until day 7.

* Nephrotoxic drugs: all the potential nephrotoxic drugs administered before ICU admission and before AKI occurrence during the ICU stay, among a predefined list, based on a previous work [24] were identified in patient's record (see Additional file 1).

## Ethical concerns

The design of the study was approved by the ethic committee of Strasbourg (Comité de Protection des Personnes N° 12/35, DC-2012-1633). Before inclusion, written informed consent was obtained from all patients. If patients were unable to provide informed consent, it was obtained from their next of kin or another surrogate decision-maker, as appropriate. Post hoc consent was obtained as soon as possible in these patients.

## Statistic

Quantitative data were expressed as mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range (IQR) for parametric and non-parametric distributions, respectively, and were compared using Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. Qualitative variables were compared using χ² or Fisher's exact test.

To identify factors associated with AKI occurrence, severity, and evolution (MAKE criteria at the end of hospital stay), as odds ratios, logistical regression models were performed. In the first step, univariate analyses were conducted for every baseline characteristic variable, independently of each other. In the second step, multivariate models were built using variables with clinical relevance and/or with p-value < 0.2 in univariate analysis. When some covariates were strongly correlated, the most associated was kept in the multivariate model. Some continuous variables (norepinephrine and fluid administration) were transformed into qualitative variables according to clinically relevant values.

As AKI occurrence and severity in the ICU depends on mortality and ICU length of stay, we performed a survival analysis in ICU free from stage 3 AKI occurrence in patients with and without DIC (DIC diagnosis was considered as baseline) during the first 7 days. Survival without stage 3 AKI was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared between the two groups with the use of a log-rank test.

## Results

### Baseline characteristics

From the 437 patients of the initial cohort, 350 patients were eligible and included in the study. Reasons for patient exclusion are presented in the flowchart (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Included patients were predominantly males, a median age of 69 years old. Patients were seriously ill with a median SAPS II of 58 (48-73) points. Cardiovascular history was the most frequent comorbidity. Baseline serum creatinine was unavailable in 106 patients (30.3%) and was extrapolated through MDRD equation calculation as planned by the study design. Infections responsible for septic shock were mainly community-acquired ones. All patients required vasopressor treatment, with norepinephrine as the first-used agent, and most of them (n=306, 87.4%) required mechanical ventilation.

Among the 350 patients included, 129 patients developed DIC, while 221 did not. DIC occurred at day 1 in 92 patients, at day 2 for 22 patients, at day 3 for 7 and between day 4 and 7 for 8 patients. Coagulation tests at admission and at DIC diagnosis are presented in Additional file 2: Table S1. No other DIC provider than sepsis was present in patients with DIC.

### Patients with DIC were more seriously ill

As shown in Table 1, although patients with DIC were less comorbid, their severity scores (SOFA and SAPSII) at ICU admission were higher. There were no differences in the source of infection, communautary or nosocomial nature of infection and microbiological findings between patients with or without DIC. As a consequence of higher severity, patients with DIC required higher doses of norepinephrine and more frequently invasive mechanical ventilation.

Among the 129 patients with DIC, 11 suffered from cirrhosis, of whom 6 met the ISTH criteria for DIC without the prothrombin time component. Among the remaining five patients, a decrease of at least 30% in platelet count over time was taken into consideration as an additional criteria [25]. Similarly, for patients treated with oral anti-coagulation with vitamin K antagonists, DIC diagnosis was retained only if they met the ISTH criteria without
<figure><img src="image_5.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 1** Flowchart of the study</figcaption></figure>

the prothrombin time component and a positive JAAM 2016 score.

## Patients with DIC had higher mortality- and AKI-rates

Patients with DIC had a higher mortality rate when compared to patients without DIC (43.3% vs. 26.2%, respectively, *p* < 0.01, for in-ICU mortality).

AKI occurred in 276 patients (78.9%). In 256 patients, AKI began within the first 24 h following ICU admission, and reached the higher stage at day 1 for 185 patients, at day 2 for 62 patients, at day 3 for 13 patients and between day 4 and 7 for the remaining 16 patients. AKI was more frequent in patients with DIC: 112 (86.8%) vs. 164 (74.2%) in patients without DIC (*p* = 0.005) (see Fig. 2 and Additional file 3: Fig. S1a). AKI and DIC occurred at the same day in 95 of the 112 patients.

## Patients with DIC were more likely to develop severe AKI and fulfill MAKE criteria

Patients with DIC were more likely to develop severe AKI, reaching stage 3 of the KDIGO classification in 73/129 patients with DIC (58.1%) versus 68/221 patients without DIC (30.8%), respectively (*p* < 0.001) (see Fig. 2

and Additional file 3: Fig. S1b). AKI stage 3 and DIC occurred at the same day in 57 of the 73 patients.

Among patients with stage 3 AKI, 108 required RRT during their ICU stay (61/129 patients with DIC (47.3%) vs. 47/221 patients without DIC (21.3%), *p* < 0.001).

We found that the higher the ISTH score, the higher the proportion of patients with stage 3 AKI (*p* < 0.001) (Fig. 3). The association between ISTH score and other outcomes is presented in Additional file 2: Table S2.

The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis assessing the likelihood of developing stage 3 AKI of the KDIGO classification showed a higher risk for patients with DIC as compared to those without DIC, displaying a hazard ratio of 2.05 (1.48–2.85), *p* < 0.001 (log-rank test) (Fig. 4) (data were censored for deaths and leaving alive from ICU).

AKD was assessed in 236 patients, as those who died before day 7 after admission were not eligible for this evaluation. Among patients with available renal function evaluation after day 7, 74 experienced AKD (31.4%), of whom 34 had DIC, and 40 had not DIC [34/75 (45.3%) vs. 40/161 (24.8%), *p* = 0.002 χ² test]. At the end of hospital stay, 71 patients (55%) with DIC fulfilled the MAKE criteria as compared to 78 patients (35.3%) without DIC (*p* < 0.001).
<table><caption>**Table 1** Baseline characteristics of the cohort, according to the occurrence of disseminate intravascular coagulation</caption><thead><tr><th>Characteristics</th><th>Total (n = 350)</th><th>Patients with DIC (n = 129)</th><th>Patients without DIC (n = 221)</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Age (years), mean ± sd</td><td>67 ± 14</td><td>66 ± 15</td><td>68 ± 13</td><td>0.115</td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>69 [60–77]</td><td>68 [57–77]</td><td>70 [60–77]</td><td>0.179</td></tr><tr><td>Male sex, n (%)</td><td>227 (64.9)</td><td>76 (58.9)</td><td>151 (68.3)</td><td>0.075</td></tr><tr><td>SAPS II (points), mean ± sd</td><td>61 ± 19</td><td>64 ± 20</td><td>59 ± 18</td><td><strong>0.011</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>58 [48–73]</td><td>64 [49–78]</td><td>56 [47–69]</td><td><strong>0.010</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SOFA (points), mean ± sd</td><td>11 ± 3</td><td>13 ± 3</td><td>10 ± 3</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>11 [9–13]</td><td>13 [10–15]</td><td>9 [8–12]</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Preexisting conditions, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic hypertension</td><td>206 (58.9)</td><td>67 (51.9)</td><td>139 (62.9)</td><td><strong>0.044</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td>103 (29.4)</td><td>28 (21.7)</td><td>75 (33.9)</td><td><strong>0.015</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic heart failure</td><td>23 (6.6)</td><td>9 (7.0)</td><td>14 (6.3)</td><td>0.815</td></tr><tr><td>Ischemic heart disease</td><td>27 (7.7)</td><td>7 (5.4)</td><td>20 (9.0)</td><td>0.220</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic kidney disease</td><td>49 (14.0)</td><td>9 (7.0)</td><td>40 (18.1)</td><td><strong>0.004</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Liver cirrhosis</td><td>14 (4.0)</td><td>11 (8.5)</td><td>3 (1.4)</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</td><td>65 (18.6)</td><td>16 (12.4)</td><td>49 (22.2)</td><td><strong>0.023</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Cancer</td><td>65 (18.6)</td><td>18 (13.9)</td><td>47 (21.3)</td><td>0.090</td></tr><tr><td>Charlson index, mean ± sd</td><td>2.6 ± 3.0</td><td>2.7 ± 2.9</td><td>2.6 ± 2.9</td><td>0.847</td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>1 [0–4]</td><td>2 [1–4]</td><td>2 [1–4]</td><td>0.227</td></tr><tr><td>Basal serum creatinine (µmol/L), mean ± sd</td><td>83.3 ± 35.8</td><td>77.6 ± 24.9</td><td>87.5 ± 40.5</td><td><strong>0.013</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>76 [62–93]</td><td>75 [61–91]</td><td>78.2 [63–95]</td><td>0.137</td></tr><tr><td>Back calculated, n (%)</td><td>106 (30.3)</td><td>47 (36.4)</td><td>59 (26.7)</td><td>0.056</td></tr><tr><td>Infection, n (%)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Source of infection</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lung</td><td>123 (35.1)</td><td>41 (31.8)</td><td>82 (37.1)</td><td>0.314</td></tr><tr><td>Abdominal</td><td>53 (15.1)</td><td>25 (19.4)</td><td>28 (12.7)</td><td>0.091</td></tr><tr><td>Urinary tract</td><td>72 (20.6)</td><td>27 (20.9)</td><td>45 (20.4)</td><td>0.899</td></tr><tr><td>Bloodstream infection</td><td>90 (25.7)</td><td>38 (29.5)</td><td>52 (23.5)</td><td>0.221</td></tr><tr><td>Other/unknown</td><td>90 (25.7)</td><td>28 (21.7)</td><td>62 (28.1)</td><td>0.190</td></tr><tr><td>Nosocomial infection</td><td>31 (8.9)</td><td>9 (7.0)</td><td>22 (10.0)</td><td>0.344</td></tr><tr><td>Immunosuppression</td><td>39 (11.1)</td><td>13 (10.1)</td><td>26 (11.8)</td><td>0.628</td></tr><tr><td>Involved bacteria</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cocci gram positive</td><td>122 (34.9)</td><td>40 (31.0)</td><td>82 (37.1)</td><td>0.248</td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus gram negative</td><td>156 (44.6)</td><td>64 (49.6)</td><td>92 (41.6)</td><td>0.147</td></tr><tr><td>Other/unknown</td><td>72 (20.6)</td><td>25 (19.4)</td><td>47 (21.3)</td><td>0.673</td></tr><tr><td>Organ-support at inclusion</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Norepinephrine, n (%)</td><td>346 (98.9)</td><td>126 (97.7)</td><td>220 (99.5)</td><td>0.112</td></tr><tr><td>Epinephrine, n (%)</td><td>36 (10.3)</td><td>18 (14.0)</td><td>18 (8.1)</td><td>0.084</td></tr><tr><td>Dobutamine, n (%)</td><td>66 (18.9)</td><td>26 (20.2)</td><td>40 (18.1)</td><td>0.635</td></tr><tr><td>Norepinephrine highest dose<sup>a</sup> (µg/kg/min), mean ± sd</td><td>1.0 ± 1.0</td><td>1.3 ± 1.4</td><td>0.8 ± 0.8</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>0.6 [0.3–1.2]</td><td>0.9 [0.4–1.9]</td><td>0.5 [0.3–0.9]</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Fluid therapy before inclusion (liters), mean ± sd</td><td>0.8 ± 1.0</td><td>0.9 ± 0.9</td><td>0.8 ± 1.0</td><td>0.330</td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>0.5 [0–1.3]</td><td>0.8 [0–1.5]</td><td>0.4 [0–1.0]</td><td>0.102</td></tr><tr><td>Invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%)</td><td>306 (87.4)</td><td>120 (93.0)</td><td>186 (84.2)</td><td><strong>0.016</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Mean diuresis at day 1 (mL/kg/h), mean ± sd</td><td>0.7 ± 0.8</td><td>0.7 ± 0.8</td><td>0.8 ± 0.8</td><td>0.294</td></tr><tr><td>Med [IQR]</td><td>0.5 [0.2–1]</td><td>0.5 [0.2–0.9]</td><td>0.5 [0.2–1.1]</td><td>0.283</td></tr></tbody></table>

Bolditalic characters were proposed to illustrate values who reached statistical significance, i.e. *p* < 0.05

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (sd), or median (Med) with interquartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables and as number and percentages for qualitative variables [n (%)]. The Chi-square test was used for qualitative data. Quantitative data were compared by t-test for mean comparison and Mann-Whitney test for median comparison

DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

<footnote>ª Norepinephrine highest dose was collected during the first 24 h after the beginning of infusion</footnote>
<figure><img src="image_6.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 2** Cumulative incidence functions of competing events: acute kidney injury in the ICU (a), AKI KDIGO3 in the ICU (b), ICU death and ICU discharge. **b** AKI KDIGO unstratified and according to DIC status (DIC [KDIGO3 DIC+] **c** and no DIC [KDIGO3 DIC−] **d**). AKI, acute kidney injury; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; KDIGO, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO 3: threefold increase from creatinine baseline or creatinine > 354 µmol/L; or Renal replacement Therapy or urine output < 0.3 mL/kg/h during 24 h or anuria during more than 12 h)</figcaption></figure>

<figure><img src="image_7.png" /><figcaption>**Fig. 3** Proportion of patients with acute kidney injury stage 3 of the KDIGO classification according to the value of the ISTH score. AKI, acute kidney injury; ISTH, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis; KDIGO, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome</figcaption></figure>

<caption>**Fig. 4** Probability of survival without acute kidney injury stage 3 of the KDIGO classification. AKI, acute kidney injury; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; KDIGO, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome. Kaplan–Meier curves of the probability of survival without AKI reaching the stage 3 of the KDIGO classification during the first 7 days, according to the presence of DIC or not. *p* < 0.001 between groups (log-rank test)</caption>
After adjustment for cofounders, DIC remained significantly associated with AKI severity and need for renal replacement therapy

After adjustment for cofounders, DIC was still significantly associated with a higher risk of KDIGO 3 AKI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.74 [IC 95% (1.53–4.91), *p* < 0.001] (Table 2). Other factors significantly associated with KDIGO3 AKI were a history of CKD [OR 2.42 (1.03–5.68), *p* = 0.043], higher SAPS II [OR 1.06 (1.04–1.07), per 1 point increment *p* < 0.001] and age [OR 0.97 (0.95–0.99), *p* = 0.011]. An association between DIC and RRT requirement was also found [OR 2.83 (1.53–5.20), *p* < 0.001] (Table 3). When considering AKI—whatever its stage—DIC occurrence was no longer associated with

AKI occurrence after multivariate analysis, nor with MAKE at the end of the hospital stay (Additional file 2: Tables S3 and 4).

Discussion

In this prospective cohort of septic shock patients, DIC was associated with a near threefold increased risk of developing the more severe stage of AKI (KDIGO3) and of requiring RRT, which highly suggest that DIC worsens the prognosis of septic shock patients and contributes to multiple organ failure and its severity. However, after adjustment, DIC was no longer associated with AKI or MAKE criteria.

<table><caption>**Table 2** Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with acute kidney injury meeting the criteria for the stage 3 of the KDIGO classification</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Univariate analysis</th><th colspan="3">Multivariate analysis</th></tr><tr><th>OR</th><th>IC 95%</th><th>p</th><th>OR</th><th>IC 95%</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIC</td><td>3.12</td><td>1.99–4.91</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>2.74</td><td>1.53–4.91</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Age (per 1-year increment)</td><td>1.0</td><td>0.99–1.02</td><td>0.645</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.95–0.99</td><td><strong>0.011</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Male sex</td><td>0.96</td><td>0.62–1.50</td><td>0.865</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>SAPS II (per 1pt increment)</td><td>1.06</td><td>1.05–1.08</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>1.06</td><td>1.04–1.07</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SOFA (per 1pt increment)</td><td>1.44</td><td>1.31–1.57</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic hypertension</td><td>1.80</td><td>1.16–2.81</td><td><strong>0.009</strong></td><td>1.75</td><td>0.95–3.20</td><td>0.071</td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td>1.56</td><td>0.98–2.48</td><td>0.059</td><td>1.41</td><td>0.77–2.60</td><td>0.265</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic heart failure</td><td>1.35</td><td>0.58–3.16</td><td>0.483</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>CKD</td><td>1.78</td><td>0.97–3.26</td><td>0.063</td><td>2.42</td><td>1.03–5.68</td><td><strong>0.043</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Liver cirrhosis</td><td>2.71</td><td>0.89–8.27</td><td>0.079</td><td>1.00</td><td>0.26–3.91</td><td>0.996</td></tr><tr><td>Cancer</td><td>0.68</td><td>0.38–1.22</td><td>0.194</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.25–1.11</td><td>0.091</td></tr><tr><td>COPD</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.47–1.42</td><td>0.475</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Source of infection</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lung</td><td>1.15</td><td>0.74–1.80</td><td>0.532</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Abdominal</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.99–3.19</td><td>0.056</td><td>1.66</td><td>0.80–3.43</td><td>0.175</td></tr><tr><td>Urinary tract</td><td>0.90</td><td>0.53–1.53</td><td>0.703</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Bloodstream infection</td><td>0.79</td><td>0.48–1.29</td><td>0.349</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Nosocomial infection</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.36–1.68</td><td>0.525</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Immunosuppression</td><td>1.13</td><td>0.58–2.22</td><td>0.713</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Cocci gram positive</td><td>0.78</td><td>0.49–1.22</td><td>0.269</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus gram negative</td><td>1.49</td><td>0.97–2.28</td><td>0.071</td><td>1.47</td><td>0.86–2.45</td><td>0.161</td></tr><tr><td>Organ-support at inclusion</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Epinephrine</td><td>6.06</td><td>2.67–13.73</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>1.99</td><td>0.71–5.55</td><td>0.187</td></tr><tr><td>Dobutamine</td><td>1.71</td><td>1.00–2.92</td><td>0.052</td><td>1.28</td><td>0.63–2.59</td><td>0.494</td></tr><tr><td>Norepinephrine > 1 µg/kg/min at day 1</td><td>3.18</td><td>1.99–5.07</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>1.31</td><td>0.72–2.39</td><td>0.372</td></tr><tr><td>Fluid before inclusion > 1L</td><td>5.57</td><td>1.21–17.18</td><td><strong>0.025</strong></td><td>4.34</td><td>0.82–23.1</td><td>0.085</td></tr><tr><td>Invasive mechanical ventilation</td><td>5.13</td><td>2.11–12.50</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>2.50</td><td>0.86–7.27</td><td>0.092</td></tr><tr><td>Nephrotoxic drugs, yes</td><td>0.52</td><td>0.19–1.43</td><td>0.207</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.18–3.23</td><td>0.724</td></tr><tr><td>Nephrotoxic drugs</td><td>1.06</td><td>0.89–1.25</td><td>0.514</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>

Bolditalic characters were proposed to illustrate values who reached statistical significance, i.e. *p* < 0.05

CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; OR, odds ratio; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
<table><caption>**Table 3** Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with renal replacement therapy requirement during the ICU stay</caption><thead><tr><th rowspan="2"></th><th colspan="3">Univariate analysis</th><th colspan="3">Multivariate analysis</th></tr><tr><th>OR</th><th>IC 95%</th><th>p</th><th>OR</th><th>IC 95%</th><th>p</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>DIC</td><td>3.32</td><td>2.07-5.33</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>2.82</td><td>1.53-5.20</td><td><strong>0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Male sex</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.55-1.42</td><td>0.62</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Age, (per 1-year increment)</td><td>1.01</td><td>0.99-1.02</td><td>0.364</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.95-1</td><td><strong>0.048</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SAPS II (per 1pt increment)</td><td>1.06</td><td>1.04-1.08</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>1.06</td><td>1.04-1.07</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td></tr><tr><td>SOFA (per 1pt increment)</td><td>1.44</td><td>1.31-1.58</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic hypertension</td><td>2.05</td><td>1.26-3.32</td><td><strong>0.004</strong></td><td>2.16</td><td>1.11-4.20</td><td><strong>0.023</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes</td><td>1.57</td><td>0.97-2.56</td><td>0.068</td><td>1.36</td><td>0.73-2.54</td><td>0.337</td></tr><tr><td>Chronic heart failure</td><td>1.21</td><td>0.50-2.95</td><td>0.674</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>CKD</td><td>1.67</td><td>0.90-3.11</td><td>0.106</td><td>1.70</td><td>0.74-3.90</td><td>0.208</td></tr><tr><td>Liver cirrhosis</td><td>4.31</td><td>1.41-13.18</td><td>0.01</td><td>2.01</td><td>0.50-7.89</td><td>0.325</td></tr><tr><td>Cancer</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.33-1.21</td><td>0.168</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.25-1.24</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>COPD</td><td>0.99</td><td>0.56-1.78</td><td>0.986</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Source of infection</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lung</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.52-1.36</td><td>0.474</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Abdominal</td><td>1.74</td><td>0.95-3.18</td><td>0.071</td><td>1.58</td><td>0.76-3.31</td><td>0.221</td></tr><tr><td>Urinary tract</td><td>0.83</td><td>0.47-1.48</td><td>0.526</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Bloodstream infection</td><td>0.71</td><td>0.41-1.21</td><td>0.208</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Nosocomial infection</td><td>0.76</td><td>0.33-1.76</td><td>0.525</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Immunosuppression</td><td>1.14</td><td>0.56-2.31</td><td>0.723</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Cocci gram positive</td><td>0.59</td><td>0.36-0.97</td><td>0.037</td><td>0.53</td><td>0.29-0.97</td><td><strong>0.04</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus gram negative</td><td>1.37</td><td>0.87-2.16</td><td>0.173</td><td>1.15</td><td>0.62-1.96</td><td>0.747</td></tr><tr><td>Organ-support at inclusion</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Epinephrine</td><td>4.77</td><td>2.31-9.83</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>1.32</td><td>0.52-3.36</td><td>0.556</td></tr><tr><td>Dobutamine</td><td>1.6</td><td>0.92-2.79</td><td>0.097</td><td>1.12</td><td>0.55-2.31</td><td>0.75</td></tr><tr><td>Norepinephrine > 1 µg/kg/min at day 1</td><td>3.75</td><td>2.31-6.08</td><td><strong>&lt;0.001</strong></td><td>0.57</td><td>0.31-1.07</td><td>0.079</td></tr><tr><td>Fluid before inclusion > 1L</td><td>2.31</td><td>0.73-7.35</td><td>0.155</td><td>0.67</td><td>0.37-1.22</td><td>0.193</td></tr><tr><td>Nephrotoxic drugs, yes</td><td>0.73</td><td>0.26-2.07</td><td>0.557</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Nephrotoxic drugs</td><td>1.09</td><td>0.91-1.33</td><td>0.336</td><td>1.02</td><td>0.80-1.30</td><td>0.871</td></tr></tbody></table>

Bolditalic characters were proposed to illustrate values who reached statistical significance, i.e. *p* < 0.05

CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; OR, hazard ratio; SAPS II, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

These findings are of interest. Indeed, if DIC occurrence was previously reported to be an independent factor associated with both severity and mortality in patients with septic shock [11, 12, 26, 27], the link between AKI and DIC had been poorly investigated. In a retrospective cohort of patients with septic shock caused by intra-abdominal infection, Xu et al. [28] showed that some coagulation biomarkers (aPTT, prothrombin time, and D-dimers) on ICU admission were significantly associated with AKI after multivariable logistic regression analysis, suggesting that coagulation activation might play a role in AKI development. Another retrospective study suggested the link between DIC and AKI, as biomarkers of endothelial injury (such as soluble thrombomodulin, E-selectin, protein C, and

plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) were associated with AKI occurrence [29]. In this study, DIC was associated with AKI in univariate analysis, but no adjustment was made with cofounders, and the timing of DIC and AKI is not described.

In acute and chronic renal disease, the coagulation system and coagulation protease-dependent signaling might be altered [30]. Coagulation regulators and receptors both play a pivotal role in hemostasis and non-hemostatic functions in the kidneys. It has indeed been shown that coagulation proteases are able to alter the function of renal cells via protease-activated receptors (PARs) and co-receptors, while activated protein C would have nephroprotective effects that are at least partly independent of its anticoagulant function. It is therefore not
surprising that excessive coagulation activation might
alter renal function.

In a monocentric retrospective study including 582 critically ill patients, overt-DIC was associated with AKI occurrence in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis, and DIC was associated with higher mortality in multivariate analysis [31]. Other studies highlighted this association [14, 15, 32]; however, none of these studies provided clear information regarding: (1) the timing of AKI development and (2) AKI severity. The design of our study is therefore original regarding these two points. Indeed, we have tried to assess the early course of both AKI and DIC during septic shock. With this in mind, we have included patients who met AKI and DIC criteria at the same timeframe.

From a pathophysiological point of view, it is now admitted that AKI related to septic shock is a multifactorial disease, not only attributable to kidney hypoperfusion. AKI associated with sepsis involves multiple mechanisms, including oxidative stress, inflammation, tubular cell adaptation to injury, renal hemodynamic alterations, and microcirculation dysfunction [7, 33]. Kidney microcirculation dysfunction during sepsis is related to both an alteration in renal blood flow [34] and to endothelial injury [35, 36], particularly in peritubular capillaries [37]. As a result, endothelial biomarkers, such as soluble thrombomodulin for example, were reported to be independent predictive biomarkers for AKI [29], even if this must be tempered as soluble thrombomodulin is excreted by kidneys. Such interplay between AKI, and endothelial dysfunction reinforces the hypothesis that AKI and DIC might be related.

DIC indeed results from excessive activation of coag-
ulation pathways associated with vascular endothelial
damage, and hypofibrinolysis [10, 38], that ultimately
results in disseminated microthrombi formation that
impairs microcirculation. Thus, DIC represents a major
contributor to the development or worsening of organ
failures [10, 11]. However, histopathologic features do
not support such association. Indeed, in *post-mortem*
renal biopsies of 19 patients with septic shock, arteri-
olar thromboses were found only in 4 patients, without
relationship with the presence of DIC or not [39].

The present study also suffers from some shortcom-
ings: being monocentric, the generalization of the find-
ings is unsure. The main limitation in the present study
is that, despite the design of our study, DIC and AKI
occurred at the same time in more than 80% of the pop-
ulation, and in 76% of the patients with AKI KDIGO3
and DIC.

Elsewhere, the high incidence of AKI (78.9%) limits
the external validity of our study. This high incidence
might, however, be explained by the severity of the

included patients (median SAPS II 61 points), and by
the definition of AKI cases, strictly according to the
KDIGO definition, taking into account urine output
criteria. Indeed, it has been reported in a large multi-
center observational cohort that taken into account
or not the diuresis component result in a large differ-
ence in the number of patients with sepsis-induced
AKI diagnosis, with differences in general and renal
evolution [40]. In addition, the epidemiology of sep-
sis-induced AKI is poorly reported [41]. However, in
a post hoc analysis of the ProCESS trial, AKI occurred
in 69% of septic shock patients during the first 7 days
after admission in the ICU, closest to our findings, with
lower severity (29.7% of patients with AKI KDIGO 3)
[42]. This high incidence of AKI in patients with high
severity scores might explain the absence of association
between AKI and DIC after adjustment for cofounders,
as a result of insufficient statistical power.

Unfortunately, renal evolution at day 7 was missing in 33% of the cohort, which precludes any conclusion with regard to renal evolution. To deal with this concern, we have collected criteria for MAKE classification, which was reported to be a relevant composite criterion to illustrate clinically meaningful adverse outcomes following AKI: new hemodialysis, death and persistent impaired renal function (with variable range for such definition).

The association between DIC and patients who fulfilled the MAKE criteria was not found after adjustment, but the time of this evaluation (end of hospitalization) is probably too early for a relevant evaluation of renal function evolution in patients who experienced septic shock.

Lastly, we have chosen the ISTH score [23] for DIC
definition whereas other score such as the Japanese Asso-
ciation for Acute Medicine-DIC (JAAM-DIC) [43] were
proposed to allow an earlier recognition of DIC in the
setting of sepsis. If the optimal score for DIC diagnosis
remain a matter of debate [44], today, the ISTH score is
recommended by learned societies [45].

Conclusion

In this prospective cohort of septic shock patients, DIC was strongly associated with the risk of KDIGO3 AKI, even after adjustment for severity and other relevant factors. Of course, this study cannot establish the causality of such relationship. If DIC indeed plays a role in the pathogenesis of AKI among patients with septic shock, forthcoming studies focusing on DIC should likely incorporate AKI as a significant outcome. Similarly, research endeavors investigating AKI within the context of sepsis and its risk factors should perhaps consider DIC as a potential contributing factor, a consideration that has not been addressed so far.
**Supplementary Information**

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01216-8.

**Additional file 1.** List of nephrotoxic drugs collected in patient's medical record.

**Additional file 2. Table S1:** Results of the coagulation test at inclusion and at diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation. **Table S2:** Main outcomes of included patients, according to the value of the ISTH score. **Table S3:** Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with Acute Kidney Injury occurrence during the ICU stay. **Table S4:** Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with Major Adverse Kidney Events at the end of the hospital stay.

**Additional file 3. Fig. S1:** a Acute Kidney Injury occurrence according to the presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. b Stages of Acute Kidney Injury (KDIGO classification), according to the presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. AKI, acute kidney injury; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; KDIGO, Kidney disease Improving global outcome (KDIGO 1: increase of 26.5 µmol/L from baseline creatinine or 1.5–1.9 fold increase from baseline or urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h during 6–12 h; KDIGO 2, 2–2.9 fold increase creatinine from baseline or urine output < 0.5 mL/h during at least 12 h; KDIGO 3, 3 fold increase from creatinine baseline or creatinine > 354 µmol/L, or Renal replacement Therapy or urine output < 0.3 mL/kg/h during 24 h or anuria during more than 12 h).

**Acknowledgements**

Not applicable.

**Author contributions**

JH, HM, FM and JD were major contributors in writing the manuscript. SL, AM, AC, JK and JD collected data. JD and FS performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

**Funding**

Not applicable.

**Availability of data and materials**

Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

**Declarations**

**Ethical approval and consent to participate**

The design of the study was approved by the ethic committee of Strasbourg (Comité de Protection des Personnes N° 12/35, DC-2012-1633). Before inclusion, written informed consent was obtained from all patients. If patients were unable to provide informed consent, it was obtained from their next of kin or another surrogate decision-maker, as appropriate. Post hoc consent was obtained as soon as possible in these patients.

**Consent for publication**

Not applicable.

**Competing interests**

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Author details**

**References**

1. Bagshaw SM, Lapinsky S, Dial S, Arabi Y, Dodek P, Wood G, et al. Acute kidney injury in septic shock: clinical outcomes and impact of duration of hypotension prior to initiation of antimicrobial therapy. Intens Care Med. 2009;35(5):871–81.

2. Metnitz PGH, Krenn CG, Steltzer H, Lang T, Ploder J, Lenz K, et al. Effect of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(9):2051–8.

3. Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81(5):442–8.

4. Wu VC, Wu CH, Huang TM, Wang CY, Lai CF, Shiao CC, et al. Long-term risk of coronary events after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(3):595–605.

5. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294(7):813–8.

6. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, Wald R, Martensson J, Maiden M, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intens Care Med. 2017;43(6):816–28.

7. Gomez H, Ince C, De Backer D, Pickkers P, Payen D, Hotchkiss J, et al. a unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11.

8. Helms J, Iba T, Connors JM, Gando S, Levi M, Meziani F, et al. How to manage coagulopathies in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(3):273–90.

9. da Cruz DB, Helms J, Aquino LR, Stiel L, Cougourdan L, Broussard C, et al. DNA-bound elastase of neutrophil extracellular traps degrades plasminogen, reduces plasmin formation, and decreases fibrinolysis: proof of concept in septic shock plasma. FASEB J. 2019;33(12):14270–80.

10. Delabranche X, Helms J, Meziani F. Immunohaemostasis: a new view on haemostasis during sepsis. Ann Intens Care. 2017;7(1):117.

11. Hartemink KJ, Hack CE, Groeneveld ABJ. Relation between coagulation/fibrinolysis and lactate in the course of human septic shock. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(11):1021–6.

12. Gando S, Shiraishi A, Yamakawa K, Ogura H, Saitoh D, Fujishima S, et al. Role of disseminated intravascular coagulation in severe sepsis. Thromb Res. 2019;178:182–8.

13. Okabayashi K, Wada H, Ohta S, Shiku H, Nobori T, Maruyama K. Hemostatic markers and the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation in an intensive care unit. Am J Hematol. 2004;76(3):225–9.

14. Delabranche X, Quenot JP, Lavigne T, Mercier E, François B, Severac F, et al. Early detection of disseminated intravascular coagulation during septic shock: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(10):e930–939.

15. Dhainaut JF, Yan SB, Joyce DE, Pettila V, Basson B, Brandt JT, et al. Treatment effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis with or without overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(11):1924–33.

16. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements. 2013 Jan;3(1):1–150.

17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

18. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957–63.

19. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10.

20. Ad-hoc working group of ERBP, Fliser D, Laville M, Covic A, Fouque D, Vanholder R, et al. A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2012;27(12):4263–72.

<footnote n="1">¹Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg Cedex, France. ²UMR 1260, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM), FMTS, INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Strasbourg, France.</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³Groupe Méthodes en Recherche Clinique (GMRC), Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.</footnote>
21. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.

22. Palevsky PM, Molitoris BA, Okusa MD, Levin A, Waikar SS, Wald R, et al. Design of clinical trials in acute kidney injury: report from an NIDDK workshop on trial methodology. CJASN. 2012;7(5):844–50.

23. Taylor FB, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M, Scientific Subcommittee on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(5):1327–30.

24. Ehrmann S, Helms J, Joret A, Martin-Lefevre L, Quenot JP, Herbrecht JE, et al. Nephrotoxic drug burden among 1001 critically ill patients: impact on acute kidney injury. Ann Intens Care. 2019;9(1):106.

25. Wada H, Takahashi H, Uchiyama T, Eguchi Y, Okamoto K, Kawasugi K, et al. The approval of revised diagnostic criteria for DIC from the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Thromb J. 2017;15:17.

26. Vallet B. Bench-to-bedside review: endothelial cell dysfunction in severe sepsis: a role in organ dysfunction? Crit Care. 2003;7(2):130–8.

27. Fourrier F, Chopin C, Goudemand J, Hendrycx S, Caron C, Rime A, et al. Septic shock, multiple organ failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Compared patterns of antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S deficiencies. Chest. 1992;101(3):816–23.

28. Xu Z, Cheng B, Fu S, Liu X, Xie G, Li Z, et al. Coagulative biomarkers on admission to the ICU predict acute kidney injury and mortality in patients with septic shock caused by intra-abdominal infection. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2755–64.

29. Katayama S, Nunomiya S, Koyama K, Wada M, Koinuma T, Goto Y, et al. Markers of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis: the role of soluble thrombomodulin. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):229.

30. Madhusudhan T, Kerlin BA, Isermann B. The emerging role of coagulation proteases in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(2):94–109.

31. Zhi DY, Lin J, Zhuang HZ, Dong L, Ji XJ, Guo DC, et al. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: clinical characteristics and outcomes. J Invest Surg. 2019;32(8):689–96.

32. Delabranche X, Boisramé-Helms J, Asfar P, Berger A, Mootien Y, Lavigne T, et al. Microparticles are new biomarkers of septic shock-induced disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Intens Care Med. 2013;39(10):1695–703.

33. De Vriese AS. Prevention and treatment of acute renal failure in sepsis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(3):792–805.

34. Tiwari MM, Brock RW, Megyesi JK, Kaushal GP, Mayeux PR. Disruption of renal peritubular blood flow in lipopolysaccharide-induced renal failure: role of nitric oxide and caspases. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289(6):F1324-1332.

35. Umbro I, Gentile G, Tinti F, Muiesan P, Mitterhofer AP. Recent advances in pathophysiology and biomarkers of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. J Infect. 2016;72(2):131–42.

36. Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):159–69.

37. Wu L, Tiwari MM, Messer KJ, Holthoff JH, Gokden N, Brock RW, et al. Peritubular capillary dysfunction and renal tubular epithelial cell stress following lipopolysaccharide administration in mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292(1):F261-268.

38. Iba T, Levi M, Thachil J, Levy JH. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: the past, present, and future considerations. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2022;48(8):978–87.

39. Lerolle N, Nochy D, Guérot E, Bruneval P, Fagon JY, Diehl JL, et al. Histopathology of septic shock induced acute kidney injury: apoptosis and leukocytic infiltration. Intens Care Med. 2010;36(3):471–8.

40. White KC, Serpa-Neto A, Hurford R, Clement P, Laupland KB, See E, et al. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: incidence, patient characteristics, timing, trajectory, treatment, and associated outcomes. A multicenter, observational study. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2023 July 11 [cited 2023 Aug 2]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07138-0.

41. Peerapornratana S, Manrique-Caballero CL, Gómez H, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury from sepsis: current concepts, epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1083–99.

42. Kellum JA, Chawla LS, Keener C, Singbartl K, Palevsky PM, Pike FL, et al. The effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on acute kidney injury in patients with septic Shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(3):281–7.

43. Iba T, Di Nisio M, Thachil J, Wada H, Asakura H, Sato K, et al. Revision of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnostic criteria using antithrombin activity. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):287.

44. Iba T, Umemura Y, Watanabe E, Wada T, Hayashida K, Kushimoto S, et al. Diagnosis of sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and coagulopathy. Acute Med Surg. 2019 Apr;ams2.411.

45. Iba T, Levy JH, Yamakawa K, Thachil J, Warkentin TE, Levi M. Proposal of a two-step process for the diagnosis of sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17(8):1265–8.

## Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Submit your manuscript to a SpringerOpen journal and benefit from:

* Convenient online submission

* Rigorous peer review

* Open access: articles freely available online

* High visibility within the field

* Retaining the copyright to your article

Submit your next manuscript at ► springeropen.com