# Can the COVID-19 Pandemic Improve the Management of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients?

Arnaud del Bello, Olivier Marion, Jacques Izopet, Nassim Kamar

► To cite this version:

Arnaud del Bello, Olivier Marion, Jacques Izopet, Nassim Kamar. Can the COVID-19 Pandemic Improve the Management of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients?. Viruses, 2022, 14 (9), pp.1860. 10.3390/v14091860. [hal-04009904](https://hal-04009904)

HAL Id: hal-04009904

https://ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-04009904

Submitted on 1 Mar 2023

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-
entific research documents, whether they are pub-
lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.

<figure><img src="image_1.png" /></figure>

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Review

# Can the COVID-19 Pandemic Improve the Management of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients?

Arnaud Del Bello <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />, Olivier Marion <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" /> ID, Jacques Izopet <fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />,<fnref n="4" /> ID and Nassim Kamar <fnref n="1" />,<fnref n="2" />,<fnref n="3" />,*,† ID

**Abstract:** Increased mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed among solid organ transplant patients. During the pandemic, in order to prevent and treat COVID-19 infections in this context, several innovative procedures and therapies were initiated within a short period of time. A large number of these innovations can be applied and expanded to improve the management of non-COVID-19 infectious diseases in solid organ transplant patients and in the case of a future pandemic. In this vein, the present paper reviews and discusses medical care system adaptation, modification of immunosuppression, adjuvant innovative therapies, the role of laboratory expertise, and the prevention of infections as examples of such innovations.

**Keywords:** COVID-19; organ transplantation; monoclonal antibodies; prevention; omicron

## 1. Introduction

Very soon after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, high mortality (up to 30%) was reported among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients [1–4], especially in areas with high viral circulation [5]. Later on, it was confirmed that this population was at high risk of symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe COVID-19. This is the result of an increased rate of comorbidities (such as advanced age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, being overweight, and having impaired kidney function) observed in this population, as well as of decreased immune responses due to the immunosuppressants administered to prevent acute rejection [6]. In addition, nosocomial transmissions were observed in these patients, who often attend health care structures for routine follow-up to receive specific therapies (such as belatacept infusions) or to be treated for complications [7].

In the face of this pandemic, health care workers and researchers rapidly concentrated their efforts on reorganizing the medical care system, finding efficient treatments against severe COVID-19, and developing and implementing prevention measures, such as the vaccination of large cohorts of immunosuppressed patients. Within this short period, the number of publications focusing on COVID-19 increased dramatically, while there was a substantial decrease in non-COVID-19-related research [8].

A considerable proportion of the innovative procedures and therapies that were introduced during the pandemic can be applied and expanded to improve the management of non-COVID-19 infectious diseases in SOT patients, and in the case of a future pandemic. The present paper briefly discusses some of these measures.

<figure><img src="image_2.png" /></figure>

check for
updates

**Citation:** Del Bello, A.; Marion, O.; Izopet, J.; Kamar, N. Can the COVID-19 Pandemic Improve the Management of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients?. *Viruses* **2022**, *14*, 1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14091860

Academic Editors: Samira Fafi-Kremer and Sophie Caillard

Received: 15 June 2022
Accepted: 22 August 2022
Published: 24 August 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

<figure><img src="image_3.png" /></figure>

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

<footnote n="1">¹ Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="2">² Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR 1291, 31300 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="3">³ University Toulouse III—Paul Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote n="4">⁴ Laboratory of Virology, Toulouse Purpan University Hospital, 31300 Toulouse, France</footnote>

<footnote>* Correspondence: kamar.n@chu-toulouse.fr; Tel.: +33-5-61-32-23-35; Fax: +33-5-61-32-39-89</footnote>

<footnote>† Current address: Nassim KAMAR, Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Toulouse Rangueil, TSA 50032, CEDEX 9, 31059 Toulouse, France.</footnote>
**2. Modification of the Medical Care System**

The lockdowns enforced in several countries prompted transplant physicians to mod-
ify the management of SOT patients. Hence, for instance, telemedicine developed rapidly
and teleconsultation was initiated to assure follow-up for transplant patients. The use of
mobile phone applications increased dramatically. Due to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 nosoco-
mial transmission, it was recommended that clinicians avoid admitting patients to hospitals
to receive specific therapies. For instance, initially, transplant physicians questioned the
in-hospital administration of intravenous belatacept, and suggested replacing it with oral
immunosuppressive regimens that required frequent laboratory testing [9]. Since the clin-
ical and biological consequences were unpredictable, we organized a specific infection
control protocol for organ transplant patients receiving maintenance belatacept therapy [10].
All patients were screened over the phone for respiratory and/or gastrointestinal symptoms
the day before the scheduled infusion. Patients who had a fever, respiratory symptoms,
gastrointestinal disorders, or who had been in contact with a person who was SARS-CoV-
2-positive were directed to a unit dedicated to suspected cases of COVID-19. A different
isolated section in the outpatient unit was dedicated to patients without symptoms of
COVID-19. In addition, at admission, patients were interviewed to detect alarming symp-
toms. Since the nosocomial transmissions of influenza viruses and *Pneumocystis Jirovecii*
were reported in this population [11], a similar protocol could at least be implemented
while influenza viruses were in circulation. Furthermore, as is current practice, the sys-
tematic wearing of masks can be highly recommended in SOT patients admitted to in- or
out-patient clinics. Later on, during the pandemic, in France, trained nurses were permitted
to administer belatacept during home visits. This practice is still allowed and is permitted
to reduce the number of hospitalizations.

In order to continue to pursue SOT transplantation during the pandemic, centers had to specify a “COVID-free” hospitalization ward. Before donation and transplantation, patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2, and a chest CT-Scan was very often performed. It was recommended that de novo transplant patients and/or SARS-CoV-2-negative patients be hospitalized in a dedicated unit, while SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were isolated in another unit. As was the case during the pandemic, it seems logical to group infected patients, for instance, those with influenza viruses or *Pneumocystis Jirovecii*, in a dedicated unit, or at least in a dedicated part of a unit. A dedicated nurse team could take care of these infected patients. This would probably decrease the risk of nosocomial transmission. Finally, SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were systematically flagged in the hospital information system. Identifying patients infected by other viruses or by multi-drug-resistant bacteria in the hospital information system will also allow clinicians to isolate patients at admission and to reduce the risk of transmission between SOT patients. Infection by multi-drug-resistant bacteria is associated with a high risk of mortality among SOT patients [12].

**3. Management of Immunosuppression during Severe Infectious Disease Complications**

At present, there is still no recommendation for the management of immunosuppres-
sion in SOT recipients presenting severe infections. This was also the case for COVID-19 [13].
In patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, there was, on the one hand, the risk of evolution to
severe acute respiratory distress, and on the other hand, the risk of acute rejection, especially
in non-kidney-transplant patients [1,14,15]. In addition, it has been suggested that pursuing
immunosuppressants could have a beneficial effect on hyperinflammation in ARDS [15].
Finally, some antiviral drugs that have been used to date, such as Remdesivir or Paxlovid®
(nirmatrelvir/ritonavir), have a drug-drug interaction with immunosuppressants, leading
to increased dose exposure [16].

Registry studies have shown that the administration of anti-metabolites was stopped
in a large proportion of in-patients. In addition, the use of calcineurin and mammalian
target of rapamycin inhibitors was decreased in a significant proportion of patients [3,17,18].
Conversely, the use of steroids was increased in most patients. In a cohort of 47 kidney
transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in whom immunosuppression, mainly
antimetabolites, was reduced (83%), no acute rejection or de novo DSAs was observed until 3 months after discharge [19]. In contrast, in a larger cohort (179 kidney transplant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2), the incidence of de novo DSA after the reduction of immunosuppression was at 4% [20]. Cases of antibody-mediated rejection were also reported [21]. This is in line with previous studies that showed a risk of development of de novo DSAs in SOT patients admitted to intensive care units and who had immunosuppression withdrawal [22,23].

Regarding out-patients, the management of immunosuppression varied between centers. No robust data were published regarding the management of immunosuppression in this setting. For instance, in our center, immunosuppression was not modified in patients not requiring hospitalization.

In summary, in the short term, the reduction does not seem to be harmful. Nevertheless, the mid- and long-term impacts, especially when DSAs occur, are still unknown. There is an urgent need to determine the optimal management of immunosuppression in SOT patients with severe infection.

# 4. Adjuvant Therapies for SOT Patients

## 4.1. Tocilizumab

A rapid increase and prolonged SARS-CoV-2 viral load, followed by an excessive and prolonged innate immune activation, was observed during COVID-19. In severe forms, a dysregulated immune response with a prothrombotic state, endothelial activation, and excessive pulmonary neutrophil recruitment emerges, with the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. This leads to respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. Notably, the Interferon type I and Interferon type III responses are reduced in COVID-19, reducing the early host innate activity. Moreover, high pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, CRP, and IL-2R), the so-called "cytokine storm syndrome", are observed in patients that develop severe forms of COVID-19 [24]. A late adaptive immune cell response, with suppressed Th1 adaptive antiviral immune response and CD8 and NK cell exhaustion or dysfunction, is observed in severe forms [25,26].

Small series [27] and, later on, randomized control trials [28,29] showed a lower risk of death and less need for mechanical ventilation in non-transplant patients given tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor blocker, as an adjuvant therapy in case of moderate or severe COVID-19. According to the NIH guidelines [30], anti-IL-6 receptor blockers are used with caution in SOT patients for treating chronic antibody-mediated rejection [31,32] or in desensitization protocols [33]. Physicians were reluctant to use tocilizumab in SOT patients. However, despite the use of prolonged immunosuppressive therapy, "cytokine storm syndrome" was observed in SOT recipients. In addition, similar to immunocompetent patients, tocilizumab seems to have a beneficial effect in treating SARS-CoV-2-infected SOT patients. In a single-center, retrospective, matched controlled study, Pereira et al. reported similar outcomes in 29 SOT patients, regardless of whether they were given tocilizumab for COVID-19 [1]. No safety issues were observed. The lack of demonstration of a beneficial effect of tocilizumab on mortality is probably related to the higher severity in patients given anti-IL6R blockers. In a multicenter retrospective study that included 80 kidney transplant recipients who have received tocilizumab, Perez-Saez et al. reported a beneficial effect of tocilizumab for controlling "cytokine storm syndrome" in cases of steroid treatment failure [34]. Additionally, we and others have reported cases of kidney transplant patients successfully being treated with tocilizumab for hemophagocytic syndrome related to COVID-19 [35,36]. Hence, this observation suggests that innovative therapies should also be proposed and tested in immunocompromised patients.

## 4.2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies

Several studies have shown the beneficial effect of anti-SARS-CoV-2 on neutralizing monoclonal antibodies when administered in the early period of infection and to in-patients not requiring oxygen with a decreasing viral load, COVID-19-related hospitalization, and
death, particularly in high-risk populations [37,38]. Due to the risk of the emergence of
drug-resistant variants [39], neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were not widely used
in immunocompromised patients. However, interestingly, despite the lack of data for
transplant patients, monoclonal antibodies were used in a very large number of SOT pa-
tients. Dhand et al. reported encouraging results in SOT patients given bamlanivimab
monotherapy or casirivimab/imdevimab [40,41]. We compared the outcomes for 16 SOT
patients who were given neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bamlanivimab monotherapy,
bamlanivimab/etesevimab, or casirivimab/imdevimab) early after infection with those of
32 SOT patients who did not receive this therapy. The proportions of patients who devel-
oped severe disease requiring ICU and of patients who died were significantly lower in
patients who were offered monoclonal antibodies [29]. These data were recently confirmed
in a large retrospective multicenter study [42]. Interestingly, despite the emergence of
resistant variants in some patients who were given bamlanivimab/etesevimab, the use of
casirivimab/imdevimab was not associated with the selection of resistant variants [43,44].
Conversely, the use of sotrovimab in combatting the Omicron variant was associated with
selected resistant variants in half of the treated patients [45]. Therefore, despite the risk of
selecting resistant variants, the use of monoclonal antibodies was beneficial for avoiding
severe disease. However, virological parameters should be monitored closely and measures
to limit virus spread should be reinforced. In immunocompromised patients with severe
COVID-19, the use of convalescent plasma therapies was also found to be beneficial [46].
Hence, both monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma therapies were successfully
used in transplant patients without having preliminary data in this setting. This suggests
that, in case of another pandemic, new therapeutics should be rapidly tested in SOT patients
and could be used in this specific population.

4.3. *Virology Laboratory Expertise*

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic prompted the quick development of virological tools that
were essential for diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis [47,48].

Beyond nucleic acid and antigen testing in nasopharyngeal swabs for detecting SARS-CoV-2, the characterization of the virus by whole-genome sequencing enabled genomic surveillance at a global level. New variants with distinct characteristics in terms of transmissibility, virulence, and immune escape were identified over time, preceding the different epidemic waves. Genomic data indicated no significant difference in the distribution of SARS-CoV-2 variants between solid organ transplant recipients and immunocompetent individuals. The characterization of SARS-CoV-2 quasispecies using third-generation long-fragment sequencing was also an effective means to analyze the selective pressure induced by the immune response or the administration of monoclonal antibodies at an individual level [49]. This approach allowed the quick identification of resistant variants in solid organ transplant recipients who were given strovimab [50] or tixagevimab/cilgavimab [51]. This close virological monitoring minimized the risk of the transmission of resistant variants to patients' relatives and in this population with prolonged viral replication. The quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using digital PCR was also very helpful for deciphering pathogenesis and analyzing the intrinsic antiviral activity of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies [43,45].

SARS-CoV-2 cultures under BSL-3 laboratory conditions were key to isolating new
variants providing biological material for internal and external quality control and the
development of serological assays designed to measure neutralizing antibodies. These
assays were used for evaluating the performance of commercial serological tests [52,53]
and for determining correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 [54–56].

Using validated serological assays that can measure neutralizing and binding antibod-
ies, we were able to compare the humoral immune response post-vaccination between SOT
recipients and healthcare workers [57]. Monitoring the antibody response, after primary
vaccination and booster injections, in SOT recipients, as in other immunocompromised
persons, was key for optimizing their management, including the decision to administer
an additional vaccine booster or initiate pre-exposition prophylaxis using neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy effective on circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Lastly, ELISpot assays and T-cell interferon-gamma release assays using spike recombinant proteins were conducted to analyze the T-cell response in vaccinated SOT recipients [58–60].

**5. Prevention**

**5.1. Anti-SARS-CoV2 Vaccination**

Within a very short period of time, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were developed. The vaccines most frequently deployed were those based on innovative technology using nucleoside-modified mRNA molecules encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [61]. Because of the increased mortality rates of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients and the lack of successful treatments, it was very quickly recommended that the vaccine be offered to immunosuppressed patients, including SOT recipients [62]. Similar to monoclonal antibodies, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were approved for SOT patients without appropriate studies in this population that is expected to have a low humoral response. Hence, when the vaccine became available, the first challenge was to contact all patients and organize the vaccination campaign. Transplant centers used different tools to contact their patients, e.g., emails, text messages, phone calls, social media, etc. This prompted all centers to create a complete database and a simple tool for contacting all patients. This tool is now available so that information pertaining to transplant patients can be procured rapidly. Secondly, we needed to organize the process of vaccinating patients. In our hospital, it was decided that the vaccine should be administered in a dedicated place within the hospital. In addition, as recommended by the Francophone Society for Transplantation, patients were asked to control their anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology after vaccination. Based on the serology results, we initially administered two doses [63], and thereafter three doses [64,65] to all patients. In weak and non-responding patients, a fourth dose was given [58]. However, this did not confer sufficient protection [58,66]. The levels conferring protection against infection were determined in studies performed on health care workers [56,67]. They varied over time according to the variants of concern. In addition, since data from all vaccinated patients were collected prospectively, several groups were able to identify risk factors for non-response to vaccination (summarized in [68]). Hence, the use of two major immunosuppressants, belatacept and mycophenolic acid, was associated with a worse humoral response to vaccination. This prompted some groups to modify immunosuppression to improve the humoral and cellular responses. The lessons from this large cohort vaccination campaign are threefold. Firstly, transplant centers informed their patients, developed tools to contact all their patients rapidly, organized vaccination, and collected data very rapidly. Secondly, COVID-19 raised the interest of transplant physicians in proposing vaccines to patients, identifying modifiable causes of non-response, and modifying immunosuppression to improve the response to the vaccines [69]. Several studies had shown that vaccines are not always offered to transplant patients [70] and that responses to several vaccines, such as influenza or hepatitis B, were not very high [69]. Risk factors for non-response to these vaccines were also identified. However, few studies have assessed the effect of modifying immunosuppression in this setting. Hence, the large number of studies performed with anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines should or will prompt transplant physicians to improve their vaccination policy in SOT patients. Thirdly, the technology of mRNA-based vaccination is also of great interest and will probably be used to develop other vaccines, such as those against HIV or other viruses. For instance, in dialysis patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation, the response to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was excellent, while in the same population, it is difficult to obtain a humoral response after vaccination against the hepatitis B virus. New technology could, therefore, be developed to improve the virological response.
## 5.2. Anti-SARS-CoV2 Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were rapidly developed and used to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in weak and non-responding immunosuppressed patients, to whom three vaccine doses were administered. Several groups, including ours, have shown that a monthly dose of casirivimab/imdevimab was highly effective in preventing Delta variant infection [44,71,72]. In a large cohort, no patient developed Delta variant infection, but this combination is not effective against the Omicron variant, both in vitro [73,74] and in vivo [75]. Currently, Evushled®, a combination of two monoclonal antibodies, Cilgavimab and Tixagevimab, is approved in several countries in this context, and they have recently demonstrated their efficacy in preventing COVID-19 infection [76]. More recently, due to breakthroughs observed in patients given pre-exposition Evushled®, it was recommended that the doses be doubled. In addition, the increased neutralizing activity of AZD7442 against the BA.2 subvariant will probably improve its efficacy in immunocompromised patients.

# 6. Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically modified the management of SOT patients. Lessons from actions taken during the pandemic can be drawn on in order to modify and likely improve the management of such patients.

**Author Contributions:** A.D.B., J.I. and N.K. wrote the paper. O.M. reviewed the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

**Institutional Review Board Statement:** Not applicable.

**Informed Consent Statement:** Not applicable.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Conflicts of Interest:** NK has received speakers fees and participated to advisory boards for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biotest, CSL Behring, Chiesi, ExeViR, Hansa, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Glasgow Smith Kline, Novartis Pharma, Sanofi, Sandoz, Takeda. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

# References

1. Pereira, M.R.; Mohan, S.; Cohen, D.J.; Husain, S.A.; Dube, G.K.; Ratner, L.E.; Arcasoy, S.; Aversa, M.M.; Benvenuto, L.J.; Dadhania, D.M.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2020**, *20*, 1800–1808. [CrossRef]

2. Villanego, F.; Mazuecos, A.; Pérez-Flores, I.M.; Moreso, F.; Andrés, A.; Jiménez-Martín, C.; Molina, M.; Canal, C.; Sánchez-Cámara, L.A.; Zárraga, S.; et al. Predictors of severe COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients in the different epidemic waves: Analysis of the Spanish Registry. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2021**, *21*, 2573–2582. [CrossRef]

3. Caillard, S.; Anglicheau, D.; Matignon, M.; Durrbach, A.; Greze, C.; Frimat, L.; Thaunat, O.; Legris, T.; Moal, V.; Westeel, P.F.; et al. An initial report from the French SOT COVID Registry suggests high mortality due to COVID-19 in recipients of kidney transplants. *Kidney Int.* **2020**, *98*, 1549–1558. [CrossRef]

4. Akalin, E.; Azzi, Y.; Bartash, R.; Seethamraju, H.; Parides, M.; Hemmige, V.; Ross, M.; Forest, S.; Goldstein, Y.D.; Ajaimy, M.; et al. Covid-19 and Kidney Transplantation. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2020**, *382*, 2475–2477. [CrossRef]

5. Thaunat, O.; Legeai, C.; Anglicheau, D.; Couzi, L.; Blancho, G.; Hazzan, M.; Pastural, M.; Savoye, E.; Bayer, F.; Morelon, E.; et al. IMPact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the mORTAlity of kidney transplant recipients and candidates in a French Nationwide registry sTudy (IMPORTANT). *Kidney Int.* **2020**, *98*, 1568–1577. [CrossRef]

6. Del Bello, A.; Kamar, N.; Vergez, F.; Faguer, S.; Marion, O.; Beq, A.; Lathrache, Y.; Abravanel, F.; Izopet, J.; Treiner, E. Adaptive lymphocyte profile analysis discriminates mild and severe forms of COVID-19 after solid organ transplantation. *Kidney Int.* **2021**, *100*, 915–927. [CrossRef]

7. Wu, T.; Kang, S.; Peng, W.; Zuo, C.; Zhu, Y.; Pan, L.; Fu, K.; You, Y.; Yang, X.; Luo, X.; et al. Original Hosts, Clinical Features, Transmission Routes, and Vaccine Development for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). *Front. Med.* **2021**, *8*, 950. [CrossRef]

8. Raynaud, M.; Goutaudier, V.; Louis, K.; Al-Awadhi, S.; Dubourg, Q.; Truchot, A.; Brousse, R.; Saleh, N.; Giarraputo, A.; Debiais, C.; et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research production. *BMC Med. Res. Methodol.* **2021**, *21*, 255. [CrossRef]
9. Gleeson, S.E.; Formica, R.N.; Marin, E.P. Outpatient Management of the Kidney Transplant Recipient during the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Pandemic. *Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.* **2020**, *15*, 892–895. [CrossRef]

10. Kamar, N.; Esposito, L.; Hebral, A.L.; Guitard, J.; Del Bello, A. Specific organization for in-hospital belatacept infusion to avoid nosocomial transmission during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2020**, *20*, 2962–2963. [CrossRef]

11. Le Gal, S.; Toubas, D.; Totet, A.; Dalle, F.; Abou Bacar, A.; Le Meur, Y.; Nevez, G.; Anofel Association. Pneumocystis Infection Outbreaks in Organ Transplantation Units in France: A Nation-Wide Survey. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* **2020**, *70*, 2216–2220. [CrossRef]

12. Qiao, B.; Wu, J.; Wan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Ye, Q. Factors influencing mortality in abdominal solid organ transplant recipients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia. *BMC Infect. Dis.* **2017**, *17*, 171. [CrossRef]

13. Manansala, M.; Baughman, R.; Novak, R.; Judson, M.; Sweiss, N. Management of immunosuppressants in the era of coronavirus disease-2019. *Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med.* **2021**, *27*, 176–183. [CrossRef]

14. Liu, H.; He, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, J.; He, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, L.; et al. Management of COVID-19 in patients after liver transplantation: Beijing working party for liver transplantation. *Hepatol. Int.* **2020**, *14*, 432–436. [CrossRef]

15. Romanelli, A.; Mascolo, S. Immunosuppression drug-related and clinical manifestation of Coronavirus disease 2019: A therapeutic hypothesis. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2020**, *20*, 1947–1948. [CrossRef]

16. Miarons, M.; Larrosa-García, M.; García-García, S.; Los-Arcos, I.; Moreso, F.; Berastegui, C.; Castells, L.; Pérez-Hoyos, S.; Varela, J.; Pau-Parra, A.; et al. COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study and Evaluation of Immunosuppression Management. *Transplantation* **2021**, *105*, 138–150. [CrossRef]

17. Cravedi, P.; Mothi, S.S.; Azzi, Y.; Haverly, M.; Farouk, S.S.; Pérez-Sáez, M.J.; Redondo-Pachón, M.D.; Murphy, B.; Florman, S.; Cyrino, L.G.; et al. COVID-19 and kidney transplantation: Results from the TANGO International Transplant Consortium. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2020**, *20*, 3140–3148. [CrossRef]

18. Søfteland, J.M.; Friman, G.; von Zur-Mühlen, B.; Ericzon, B.G.; Wallquist, C.; Karason, K.; Friman, V.; Ekelund, J.; Felldin, M.; Magnusson, J.; et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A national cohort study from Sweden. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2021**, *21*, 2762–2773. [CrossRef]

19. Anton Pampols, P.; Trujillo, H.; Melilli, E.; Urban, B.; Sandino, J.; Favá, A.; Gutierrez, E.; Bestard, O.; Mancebo, E.; Sevillano, A.; et al. Immunosuppression minimization in kidney transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19. *Clin. Kidney J.* **2021**, *14*, 1229–1235. [CrossRef]

20. Masset, C.; Gautier-Vargas, G.; Cantarovich, D.; Ville, S.; Dantal, J.; Delbos, F.; Walencik, A.; Kerleau, C.; Hourmant, M.; Garandeau, C.; et al. Occurrence of De novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Low Despite Immunosuppression Modulation. *Kidney Int. Rep.* **2022**, *7*, 983–992. [CrossRef]

21. Del Bello, A.; Marion, O.; Sallusto, F.; Delas, A.; Esposito, L.; Doumerc, N.; Kamar, N. Kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Potential long-term consequences of an early post-transplant infection. *Transpl. Infect. Dis.* **2021**, *23*, e13446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22. Guinault, D.; Del Bello, A.; Lavayssiere, L.; Nogier, M.-B.; Cointault, O.; Congy, N.; Esposito, L.; Hebral, A.-L.; Roques, O.; Kamar, N.; et al. Outcomes of kidney transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit: A retrospective study of 200 patients. *BMC Anesthesiol.* **2019**, *19*, 130. [CrossRef]

23. Timsit, J.F.; Bonneville, R.; Kalil, A.C.; Bassetti, M.; Ferrer, R.; Jaber, S.; Lanternier, F.; Luyt, C.E.; Machado, F.; Mikulska, M.; et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients. *Intensive Care Med.* **2019**, *45*, 573–591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Del Valle, D.M.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Huang, H.H.; Beckmann, N.D.; Nirenberg, S.; Wang, B.; Lavin, Y.; Swartz, T.H.; Madduri, D.; Stock, A.; et al. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. *Nat. Med.* **2020**, *26*, 1636–1643. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. García, L.F. Immune Response, Inflammation, and the Clinical Spectrum of COVID-19. *Front. Immunol.* **2020**, *11*, 1441. [CrossRef]

26. Jones, B.E.; Brown-Augsburger, P.L.; Corbett, K.S.; Westendorf, K.; Davies, J.; Cujec, T.P.; Wiethoff, C.M.; Blackbourne, J.L.; Heinz, B.A.; Foster, D.; et al. The neutralizing antibody, LY-CoV555, protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in nonhuman primates. *Sci. Transl. Med.* **2021**, *13*, eabf1906. [CrossRef]

27. Xu, X.; Han, M.; Li, T.; Sun, W.; Wang, D.; Fu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. *Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA* **2020**, *117*, 10970–10975. [CrossRef]

28. RECOVERY Collaborative Group; Horby, P.W.; Pessoa-Amorim, G.; Peto, L.; Brightling, C.E.; Sarkar, R.; Thomas, K.; Jeebun, V.; Ashish, A.; Tully, R.; et al. Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): A randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. *Lancet* **2021**, *397*, 1637–1645. [CrossRef]

29. The REMAP-CAP Investigators. Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2021**, *384*, 1491–1502. [CrossRef]

30. Interleukin-6 Inhibitors | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/immunomodulators/interleukin-6-inhibitors/ (accessed on 19 October 2021).

31. Choi, J.; Aubert, O.; Vo, A.; Loupy, A.; Haas, M.; Puliyanda, D.; Kim, I.; Louie, S.; Kang, A.; Peng, A.; et al. Assessment of Tocilizumab (Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Monoclonal) as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy in HLA-Sensitized Renal Allograft Recipients. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2017**, *17*, 2381–2389. [CrossRef]
32. Massat, M.; Congy-Jolivet, N.; Hebral, A.L.; Esposito, L.; Marion, O.; Delas, A.; Colombat, M.; Faguer, S.; Kamar, N.; Del Bello, A. Do anti-IL-6R blockers have a beneficial effect in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection resistant to standard therapy after kidney transplantation? *Am. J. Transplant.* **2021**, *21*, 1641–1649. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33. Vo, A.A.; Choi, J.; Kim, I.; Louie, S.; Cisneros, K.; Kahwaji, J.; Toyoda, M.; Ge, S.; Haas, M.; Puliyanda, D.; et al. A Phase I/II Trial of the Interleukin-6 Receptor-Specific Humanized Monoclonal (Tocilizumab) + Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Difficult to Desensitize Patients. *Transplantation* **2015**, *99*, 2356–2363. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. Pérez-Sáez, M.J.; Blasco, M.; Redondo-Pachón, D.; Ventura-Aguiar, P.; Bada-Bosch, T.; Pérez-Flores, I.; Melilli, E.; Sánchez-Cámara, L.A.; López-Oliva, M.O.; Canal, C.; et al. Use of tocilizumab in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2020**, *20*, 3182–3190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

35. Faguer, S.; Del Bello, A.; Abravanel, F.; Nicolau-Travers, M.L.; Kamar, N. Tocilizumab for Hemophagocytic Syndrome in a Kidney Transplant Recipient With COVID-19. *Ann. Intern. Med.* **2020**, *173*, 501–503. [CrossRef]

36. Gautier-Vargas, G.; Baldacini, C.; Benotmane, I.; Keller, N.; Perrin, P.; Moulin, B.; Caillard, S. Rapid resolution of cytokine release syndrome and favorable clinical course of severe COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient treated with tocilizumab. *Kidney Int.* **2020**, *98*, 508–509. [CrossRef]

37. Dougan, M.; Nirula, A.; Azizad, M.; Mocherla, B.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Chen, P.; Hebert, C.; Perry, R.; Boscia, J.; Heller, B.; et al. Bamlanivimab plus Etesevimab in Mild or Moderate Covid-19. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2021**, *385*, 1382–1392. [CrossRef]

38. Chen, P.; Nirula, A.; Heller, B.; Gottlieb, R.L.; Boscia, J.; Morris, J.; Huhn, G.; Cardona, J.; Mocherla, B.; Stosor, V.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with Covid-19. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2021**, *384*, 229–237. [CrossRef]

39. Peiffer-Smadja, N.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Ferré, V.M.; Charpentier, C.; Garé, M.; Rioux, C.; Allemand, A.; Lavallée, P.; Ghosn, J.; Kramer, L.; et al. Emergence of e484k mutation following bamlanivimab monotherapy among high-risk patients infected with the alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2. *Viruses* **2021**, *13*, 1642. [CrossRef]

40. Dhand, A.; Lobo, S.A.; Wolfe, K.; Feola, N.; Nabors, C. Bamlanivimab for treatment of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Early single-center experience. *Clin. Transplant.* **2021**, *35*, e14245. [CrossRef]

41. Dhand, A.; Lobo, S.A.; Wolfe, K.; Feola, N.; Lee, L.; Nog, R.; Chen, D.; Glicklich, D.; Diflo, T.; Nabors, C. Casirivimab-imdevimab for Treatment of COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Early Experience. *Transplantation* **2021**, *105*, e68–e69. [CrossRef]

42. Gueguen, J.; Colosio, C.; Del Bello, A.; Scemla, A.; N'Guyen, Y.; Rouzaud, C.; Carvalho-Schneider, C.; Gautier Vargas, G.; Tremolières, P.; Eddine, A.J.; et al. Early Administration of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies Prevents Severe COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Patients. *Kidney Int. Rep.* **2022**, *7*, 1241–1247. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

43. Vellas, C.; Del Bello, A.; Gaube, G.; Tremeaux, P.; Jeanne, N.; Ranger, N.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Delobel, P.; Kamar, N.; Izopet, J. Impact of Casirivimab-Imdevimab on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Delta Variant Nasopharyngeal Virus Load and Spike Quasispecies. *Open Forum Infect. Dis.* **2022**, *9*, ofac093. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

44. Del Bello, A.; Marion, O.; Vellas, C.; Faguer, S.; Izopet, J.; Kamar, N. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies in Solid-organ Transplant Patients. *Transplantation* **2021**, *105*, e146–e147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

45. Vellas, C.; Del Bello, A.; Debard, A.; Steinmeyer, Z.; Tribaudeau, L.; Ranger, N.; Jeanne, N.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Delobel, P.; Kamar, N.; et al. Influence of treatment with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies on the SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal load and quasispecies. *Clin. Microbiol. Infect.* **2022**, *28*, 139.e5–139.e8. [CrossRef]

46. Senefeld, J.W.; Klassen, S.A.; Ford, S.K.; Senese, K.A.; Wiggins, C.C.; Bostrom, B.C.; Thompson, M.A.; Baker, S.E.; Nicholson, W.T.; Johnson, P.W.; et al. Use of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with immunosuppression. *Transfusion* **2021**, *61*, 2503–2511. [CrossRef]

47. Benotmane, I.; Risch, S.; Doderer-Lang, C.; Caillard, S.; Fafi-Kremer, S. Long-term shedding of viable SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2021**, *21*, 2871–2875. [CrossRef]

48. Caillard, S.; Benotmane, I.; Gautier Vargas, G.; Perrin, P.; Fafi-Kremer, S. SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in immunocompromised patients. *Am. J. Trans-Plant.* **2021**, *21*, 1667–1669. [CrossRef]

49. Lhomme, S.; Latour, J.; Jeanne, N.; Trémeaux, P.; Ranger, N.; Migueres, M.; Salin, G.; Donnadieu, C.; Izopet, J. Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Lineages Using the S1-Encoding Region Sequence Obtained by PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing. *Viruses* **2021**, *13*, 2544. [CrossRef]

50. Vellas, C.; Trémeaux, P.; Del Bello, A.; Latour, J.; Ranger, N.; Danet, C.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Delobel, P.; Kamar, N.; Izopet, J. Resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in patients treated with sotrovimab. *Clin. Microbiol. Infect.* **2022**. [CrossRef]

51. Vellas, C.; Kamar, N.; Izopet, J. Resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant after tixagevimab-cilgavimab treatment. *J. Infect.* **2022**. [CrossRef]

52. Abravanel, F.; Miédouge, M.; Chapuy-Regaud, S.; Mansuy, J.M.; Izopet, J. Clinical performance of a rapid test compared to a microplate test to detect total anti SARS-CoV-2 antibodies directed to the spike protein. *J. Clin. Virol.* **2020**, *130*, 104528. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

53. Chapuy-Regaud, S.; Miédougé, M.; Abravanel, F.; Da Silva, I.; Porcheron, M.; Fillaux, J.; Diméglio, C.; Izopet, J. Evaluation of Three Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays. *Microbiol. Spectr.* **2021**, *9*, e01376-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54. Dimeglio, C.; Migueres, M.; Mansuy, J.-M.; Saivin, S.; Miedougé, M.; Chapuy-Regaud, S.; Izopet, J. Antibody titers and breakthrough infections with Omicron SARS-CoV-2. *J. Infect.* **2022**, *84*, e13–e15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Dimeglio, C.; Herin, F.; Miedougé, M.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Soulat, J.M.; Izopet, J. Protection of Healthcare Workers Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Reinfection. *Clin. Infect. Dis.* **2021**, *73*, 1323–1324. [CrossRef]

56. Dimeglio, C.; Herin, F.; Miedougé, M.; Da-Silva, I.; Porcheron, M.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Soulat, J.M.; Izopet, J. One year later: SARS-CoV-2 immune response and vaccination of healthcare workers post-infection. *J. Infect.* **2021**, *83*, 381–412. [CrossRef]

57. Kamar, N.; Abravanel, F.; Marion, O.; Esposito, L.; Hebral, A.L.; Médrano, C.; Guitard, J.; Lavayssière, L.; Cointault, O.; Nogier, M.B.; et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and neutralizing antibodies at 1 and 3 months after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large cohort of solid organ transplant patients. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2022**, *22*, 1467–1474. [CrossRef]

58. Kamar, N.; Izopet, J.; Marion, O.; Del Bello, A.; Couat, C.; Abravanel, F. Four doses of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-based vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients. *JAMA Netw. Open* **2021**, *4*, e2136030. [CrossRef]

59. Abravanel, F.; Marion, O.; Del Bello, A.; Beunon, T.; Romieu-Mourez, R.; Couat, C.; Pucelle, M.; Staes, L.; Guitard, J.; Esposito, L.; et al. Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses of Solid Organ Transplant Patients on Belatacept to Three Doses of mRNA-Based Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. *Vaccines* **2022**, *10*, 354. [CrossRef]

60. Renaudineau, Y.; Abravanel, F.; Izopet, J.; Bost, C.; Treiner, E.; Congy, N.; Blancher, A. Novel T cell interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) using spike recombinant protein for COVID19 vaccine response and Nucleocapsid for SARS-CoV2 response. *Clin. Immunol.* **2022**, *237*, 108979. [CrossRef]

61. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Pérez Marc, G.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2020**, *383*, 2603–2615. [CrossRef]

62. Stucchi, R.S.B.; Lopes, M.H.; Kumar, D.; Manuel, O. Vaccine recommendations for solid-organ transplant recipients and donors. *Transplantation* **2018**, *102*, S72–S80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

63. Marion, O.; Del Bello, A.; Abravanel, F.; Couat, C.; Faguer, S.; Esposito, L.; Hebral, A.L.; Izopet, J.; Kamar, N. Safety and Immunogenicity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplants. *Ann. Intern. Med.* **2021**, *174*, 1336–1338. [CrossRef]

64. Kamar, N.; Abravanel, F.; Marion, O.; Couat, C.; Izopet, J.; Del Bello, A. Three Doses of an mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2021**, *385*, 661–662. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

65. Del Bello, A.; Abravanel, F.; Marion, O.; Couat, C.; Esposito, L.; Lavayssière, L.; Izopet, J.; Kamar, N. Efficiency of a boost with a third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-based vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients. *Am. J. Transplant.* **2022**, *22*, 322–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66. Caillard, S.; Thaunat, O.; Benotmane, I.; Masset, C.; Blancho, G. Antibody Response to a Fourth Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Series. *Ann. Intern. Med.* **2022**, *175*, 455–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

67. Dimeglio, C.; Herin, F.; Martin-Blondel, G.; Miedougé, M.; Izopet, J. Antibody titers and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 infection. *J. Infect.* **2022**, *84*, 248–288. [CrossRef]

68. Manothummetha, K.; Chuleerarux, N.; Sanguankeo, A.; Kates, O.S.; Hirankarn, N.; Thongkam, A.; Dioverti-Prono, M.V.; Torvorapanit, P.; Langsiri, N.; Worasilchai, N.; et al. Immunogenicity and Risk Factors Associated With Poor Humoral Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. *JAMA Netw. Open* **2022**, *5*, E226822. [CrossRef]

69. Scanlon, N.; Saklawi, Y.; Rouphael, N. The Role of Systems Vaccinology in Understanding the Immune Defects to Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. *Front. Immunol.* **2020**, *11*, 2932. [CrossRef]

70. Danziger-Isakov, L.; Kumar, D. Vaccination of solid organ transplant candidates and recipients: Guidelines from the American society of transplantation infectious diseases community of practice. *Clin. Transplant.* **2019**, *33*, e13563. [CrossRef]

71. Dimeglio, C.; Del Bello, A.; Chapuy-Regaud, S.; Esposito, L.; Danet, C.; Couat, C.; Izopet, J.; Kamar, N. Casirivimab-imdevimab to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. *Transplantation* **2022**, *106*, e275–e276. [CrossRef]

72. Ducloux, D.; Courivaud, C. REGEN-Cov antibody combination to prevent COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipient without detectable antibody response to optimal vaccine scheme. *Kidney Int.* **2022**, *101*, 645. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

73. Planas, D.; Saunders, N.; Maes, P.; Guivel-Benhassine, F.; Planchais, C.; Buchrieser, J.; Bolland, W.H.; Porrot, F.; Staropoli, I.; Lemoine, F.; et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. *Nature* **2022**, *602*, 671–675. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

74. Hoffmann, M.; Krüger, N.; Schulz, S.; Cossmann, A.; Rocha, C.; Kempf, A.; Nehlmeier, I.; Graichen, L.; Moldenhauer, A.S.; Winkler, M.S.; et al. The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. *Cell* **2022**, *185*, 447–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

75. Kamar, N.; Gouin, A.; Izopet, J. Omicron breakthrough infection in a kidney-transplant patient given pre-exposition casirivimab and imdevimab monoclonal antibodies. *Transpl. Infect. Dis.* **2022**, *24*, e13803. [CrossRef]

76. Levin, M.J.; Ustianowski, A.; De Wit, S.; Launay, O.; Avila, M.; Templeton, A.; Yuan, Y.; Seegobin, S.; Ellery, A.; Levinson, D.J.; et al. Intramuscular AZD7442 (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) for Prevention of Covid-19. *N. Engl. J. Med.* **2022**, *386*, 2188–2200. [CrossRef]